Climb Global Solutions, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March
31, 2009
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the transition period
from __________ to __________
Commission
File No. 000-26408
Wayside
Technology Group, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3136104
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
1157 Shrewsbury Avenue,
Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(732)
389-8950
|
||
Registrant's
Telephone Number
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of "large accelerated filer,” and “accelerated filer" and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Check
One:
Large
Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer o
|
||
Non-Accelerated
Filer o
|
Smaller
Reporting Company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
There
were 4,774,362 outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, as
of May 8, 2009, not including 510,138 shares classified as treasury
stock.
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
WAYSIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
|
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 7,216 | $ | 9,349 | ||||
Marketable
securities
|
9,758 | 9,367 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances of $1,010 and
|
||||||||
$1,086,
respectively
|
21,266 | 16,940 | ||||||
Inventory,
net
|
811 | 1,058 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
564 | 776 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
672 | 712 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
40,287 | 38,202 | ||||||
Equipment
and leasehold improvements, net
|
527 | 549 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable-long-term
|
6,064 | 7,860 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
39 | 66 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
735 | 808 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 47,652 | $ | 47,485 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 23,747 | $ | 23,396 | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
78 | 205 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
23,825 | 23,601 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares
|
||||||||
authorized,
5,284,500 shares issued; 4,639,786 and
|
||||||||
4,643,662
shares outstanding, respectively
|
53 | 53 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
26,108 | 26,636 | ||||||
Treasury
stock, at cost, 644,714 and 640,838 shares,
|
||||||||
respectively
|
(3,410 | ) | (3,383 | ) | ||||
Retained
Earnings
|
1,145 | 567 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(69 | ) | 11 | |||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
23,827 | 23,884 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 47,652 | $ | 47,485 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Page 2 of
21
WAYSIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
||
(Unaudited)
|
||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 31,750 | $ | 40,506 | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
28,283 | 36,761 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,467 | 3,745 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
2,651 | 2,942 | ||||||
Income
from operations
|
816 | 803 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
148 | 234 | ||||||
Realized
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
(1 | ) | 3 | |||||
Income
before income tax provision
|
963 | 1,040 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
385 | 411 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 578 | $ | 629 | ||||
Net
income per common share - Basic
|
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | ||||
Net
income per common share – Diluted
|
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | ||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding-Basic
|
4,386 | 4,441 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding-Diluted
|
4,413 | 4,533 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Page 3 of
21
WAYSIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except share
amounts)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
|
Treasury
|
Retained
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Earnings
|
Income
(loss)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2009
|
5,284,500 | $ | 53 | $ | 26,636 | 640,838 | $ | (3,383 | ) | $ | 567 | $ | 11 | $ | 23,884 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
578 | 578 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income :
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation
adjustment
|
(47 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on available- for-sale securities
|
(33 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
498 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(692 | ) | (692 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
184 | 184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
expense from share- based compensation
|
(20 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares repurchased
|
3,876 | (27 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
5,284,500 | $ | 53 | $ | 26,108 | 644,714 | $ | (3,410 | ) | $ | 1,145 | $ | (69 | ) | $ | 23,827 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Page 4 of
21
WAYSIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||
(Unaudited)
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 578 | $ | 629 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating
|
||||||||
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
78 | 85 | ||||||
Bad debt expense
|
9 | 11 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
113 | 92 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense
|
184 | 184 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(2,576 | ) | 2,820 | |||||
Inventory
|
247 | 277 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
211 | (335 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
244 | (4,167 | ) | |||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities
|
24 | (30 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(888 | ) | (434 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
(4,663 | ) | (3,047 | ) | ||||
Redemptions of available-for-sale securities
|
4,240 | 5,000 | ||||||
Capital expenditures
|
(56 | ) | (256 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(479 | ) | 1,697 | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Dividend paid
|
(692 | ) | (707 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
- | 32 | ||||||
Treasury stock repurchased
|
(27 | ) | (391 | ) | ||||
Tax expense from share- based compensation
|
(20 | ) | - | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(739 | ) | (1,066 | ) | ||||
Effect
of foreign exchange rate on cash
|
(27 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,133 | ) | 119 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
9,349 | 14,241 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 7,216 | $ | 14,360 | ||||
Supplementary
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Income taxes paid
|
649 | 830 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Page 5 of
21
WAYSIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
March
31, 2009
1. The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Wayside
Technology Group, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do
not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements.
The
preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to
product returns, bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, income
taxes, stock-based compensation and costs associated with exit or disposal
activities, and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. In the opinion of the Company’s
management, all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature, considered
necessary for fair presentation, have been included. Actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full year. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange
Commission for the year ended December 31, 2008.
2. In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”)
115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments.” This FSP changes existing guidance for determining whether an
impairment of debt securities is other than temporary. The FSP requires other
than temporary impairments to be separated into the amount representing the
decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from a security (referred to as
credit losses) which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to other
factors which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This noncredit loss
component of the impairment may only be classified in other comprehensive income
if the holder of the security concludes that it does not intend to sell and it
will not more likely than not be required to sell the security before it
recovers its value. If these conditions are not met, the noncredit loss must
also be recognized in earnings. When adopting the FSP, an entity is required to
record a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of
adoption to reclassify the noncredit component of a previously recognized other
than temporary impairment from retained earnings to accumulated other
comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Management is currently
evaluating the requirements of the FSP and has not yet determined the impact on
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides
additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of
activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to
normal market activity for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides
additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not
orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption of this FSP will
materially impact the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
FSP
107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP
107-1), increases the frequency of fair value disclosures required by Statements
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value
of Financial Instruments (SFAS No. 107). FSP 107-1 relates to fair value
disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected on
the balance sheet of companies at fair value. Prior to issuing this FSP, fair
values for these assets and liabilities were only required to be disclosed once
a year. The FSP now requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis effective
June 30 2009, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair
value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance
sheet at fair value.
Page 6 of
21
3. Assets
and liabilities of the Company’s Canadian subsidiary have been translated at
current exchange rates, and related revenues and expenses have been translated
at average rates of exchange in effect during the period. The revenue from our
Canadian operations in the first three months of 2009 was $2.6 million as
compared to $6.0 million for the first three months of 2008.
4. Cumulative
translation adjustments and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities have been classified within accumulated other comprehensive income,
which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income.”
5. The
Company records revenues from sales transactions when title to products sold
passes to the customer. Usual sales terms are FOB shipping point, at which time
title and risk of loss has passed to the customer and delivery has
occurred. Revenue is recognized in accordance with Statements of
Position (“SOP”) 97-2 “ Software Revenue Recognition”, Staff Accounting Bulletin
(“SAB”) No. 101 and No. 104, "Revenue Recognition" and Emerging Issues Task
Force (“EITF”) 99-19, "Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent". The majority of the Company’s revenues relates to physical products and
is recognized on a gross basis with the selling price to the customer recorded
as net sales with the acquisition cost of the product to the Company recorded as
cost of sales. At the time of sale, the Company also records an estimate for
sales returns based on historical experience. Certain software maintenance
products, third party services and extended warranties sold by the Company (for
which the Company is not the primary obligor) are recognized on a net basis.
Accordingly, such revenues are recognized in net sales either at the time of
sale or over the contract period, based on the nature of the contract, at the
net amount retained by the Company, with no cost of goods sold.
6. Vendor
rebates and price protection are recorded when earned as a reduction to cost of
sales or merchandise inventory, as applicable. Cooperative reimbursements from
vendors, which are earned and available, are recorded in the period the related
advertising expenditure is incurred. Cooperative reimbursements are recorded as
net sales in accordance with EITF 02-16 “Accounting by a Customer (including
reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.”
7. Investments
in available-for-sale securities at March 31, 2009 were (in
thousands):
Cost
|
Market
value
|
Unrealized
Gain (loss)
|
||||||||||
U.S.
Government Securities
|
$ | 6,071 | $ | 6,079 | $ | 8 | ||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
3,693 | 3,679 | $ | (14 | ) | |||||||
Total
Marketable securities
|
$ | 9,764 | $ | 9,758 | $ | (6 | ) |
The cost
and market value of the Company’s investments at March 31, 2009 by contractual
maturity were (in thousands):
Estimated
|
||||||||
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 9,764 | $ | 9,758 |
Investments
in available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2008 were (in
thousands):
Cost
|
Market
value
|
Unrealized
Gain (loss)
|
||||||||||
U.S.
Government Securities
|
$ | 8,057 | $ | 8,087 | $ | 30 | ||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
1,284 | 1,280 | $ | (4 | ) | |||||||
Total
Marketable securities
|
$ | 9,341 | $ | 9,367 | $ | 26 |
Page 7 of
21
The cost
and market value of the Company’s investments at December 31, 2008 by
contractual maturity were (in thousands):
Estimated
|
||||||||
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 9,341 | $ | 9,367 |
8. Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under
generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, “Partial
Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157,” which deferred the effective
date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company uses the following methods
for determining fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157. For assets and
liabilities that are measured using quoted prices in active markets for the
identical asset or liability, the total fair value is the published market price
per unit multiplied by the number of units held without consideration of
transaction costs (Level 1). Assets and liabilities that are measured using
significant other observable inputs are valued by reference to similar assets or
liabilities, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted
prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or
can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2). For all remaining
assets and liabilities for which there are no significant observable inputs,
fair value is derived using an assessment of various discount rates, default
risk, credit quality and the overall capital market liquidity (Level
3).
The
following table summarizes the basis used to measure certain financial assets
and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance
sheet:
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 Using
|
||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
Description
|
Balance
at
March 31,
2009
|
Quoted Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Items
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Government Securities
|
$ | 6,079 | $ | 6,079 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
$ | 3,679 | $ | 3,679 |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
|
||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
Description
|
Balance
at
December 31,
2008
|
Quoted Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Items
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Government Securities
|
$ | 8,087 | $ | 8,087 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
$ | 1,280 | $ | 1,280 |
U.S. Government
Securities - U.S. government securities are valued using quoted market
prices.Accordingly, U.S. government securities are categorized in Level 1
of the fair value hierarchy.
Page 8 of
21
Certificates of deposit- The fair
value of certificates of deposit is estimated using third-party quotations.These
deposits are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
9. Balance
Sheet Detail – Other Assets (in thousands):
Equipment
and leasehold improvements consist of the following as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008:
March
31,
2009 |
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Equipment
|
$ | 2,382 | $ | 2,330 | ||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
549 | 549 | ||||||
2,931 | 2,879 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(2,404 | ) | (2,330 | ) | ||||
$ | 527 | $ | 549 |
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses consist of the following as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008:
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008 |
|||||||
Trade
accounts payable
|
$ | 22,430 | $ | 21,212 | ||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
1,317 | 2,184 | ||||||
$ | 23,747 | $ | 23,396 |
10. Basic
EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed considering the
potentially dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and nonvested shares of
restricted stock. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the
basic and diluted per share computations follows (in thousands, except per share
data):
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 578 | $ | 629 | ||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares (Basic)
|
4,386 | 4,441 | ||||||
Dilutive
effect of outstanding options and nonvested shares of restricted
stock
|
27 | 92 | ||||||
Weighted
average shares including assumed conversions (Diluted)
|
4,413 | 4,533 | ||||||
Basic
net income per share
|
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 | ||||
Diluted
net income per share
|
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.14 |
11. The
Company had two major vendors that accounted for 14.3% and 12.1% of total
purchases during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company had one
major vendor that accounted for 26.1% of total purchases during the three months
ended March 31, 2008. The Company had one major customer that accounted for
11.0% of total net sales during the three months ended March 31, 2009, and 12.8%
of total accounts receivable as of March 31, 2009. The Company had no major
customers accounting for greater than 10% of total net sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2008.
Page 9 of
21
12. The
Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. With a few
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal,state and local, or
non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2005. The
Company’s policy is to recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits
as interest expense and penalties as operating expenses.
Accrued interest is insignificant and there are no penalties accrued at
March 31, 2009. The Company believes that it has appropriate support for
the income tax positions taken and to be taken on its tax returns and that its
accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an
assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax
law applied to the facts of each matter.
The provision consists of the following
(in thousands):
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Current:
|
||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 202 | $ | 216 | ||||
State
|
49 | 35 | ||||||
Canada
|
21 | 69 | ||||||
272 | 320 | |||||||
Deferred
tax expense
|
113 | 91 | ||||||
$ | 385 | $ | 411 | |||||
Effective
tax rate
|
40 | % | 40 | % |
A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of net unrecognized tax
benefits is as follows (in thousands):
Federal,
State and Foreign Tax
|
||||
Balance
at January 1, 2009
|
$ | 78 | ||
Additions
based on tax positions related to current year
|
- | |||
Net
Unrecognized Tax Benefit at March 31, 2009
|
$ | 78 |
The net
Unrecognized Tax Benefit is included as a component of Other Liabilities within
the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
13. In
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment,” recognized compensation
cost for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 includes 1) compensation
cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of
January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with
the original provisions of Statement 123; and 2) compensation cost for all
share-based payments granted on or after January 1, 2006, based on the grant
date fair value estimated in accordance with Statement 123(R).
At the
annual stockholders’ meeting held on June 14, 2006, the Company’s stockholders
approved the 2006 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan
authorizes the grant of Stock Options, Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights,
Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock, Stock Bonuses, and other equity-based awards.
The total number of shares of Common Stock initially available under the 2006
Plan was 800,000. As of March 31, 2009, the number of shares of common stock
available for future award grants to employees and directors under this plan is
413,500.
During
2006, the Company granted a total of 315,000 shares of restricted common stock
to officers, directors and employees. Included in this grant were 200,000
restricted shares granted to the Company’s CEO in accordance with his employment
agreement. These 200,000 restricted shares vest over 120 months. The remaining
shares granted vest over 60 months.
Page 10
of 21
During
2007, the Company granted a total of 30,000 shares of restricted stock to
officers, directors and employees. These shares vest over 60 months. A total of
12,500 shares of restricted common stock were forfeited as a result of employees
and officers terminating employment with the Company.
During
2008, the Company granted a total of 57,500 shares of restricted stock to
officers and directors. These shares vest over 60 months. A total of 3,500
shares of restricted common stock were forfeited as a result of employees
terminating employment with the Company.
In July
2008, the Company approved the increase of its common stock repurchase program
by 500,000 shares. The company expects to purchase shares from time to time in
the market or otherwise subject to market conditions
Changes
during 2009 in options outstanding for the Company’s combined plans were as
follows:
Number
of Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value ($M)(1)
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2009
|
392,890 | $ | 8.12 | |||||||||||||
Granted
in 2009
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||
Canceled
in 2009
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
in 2009
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2009
|
392,890 | $ | 8.12 | 4.9 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2009
|
392,890 | $ | 8.12 | 4.9 | $ | 0.2 |
(1) The
intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value on the
last trading day of the quarter (March 31, 2009) and the exercise price of the
shares. The market value as of March 31, 2009 was $6.95 per share as
reported by The NASDAQ Global Market.
A summary
of nonvested shares of restricted stock awards outstanding under the Company’s
2006 Plan as of March 31, 2009, and changes during the three months then ended
is as follows:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date
Fair
Value
|
|||||||
Nonvested
shares at January 1, 2009
|
264,750 | $ | 12.76 | |||||
Granted
in 2009
|
- | - | ||||||
Vested
in 2009
|
(14,125 | ) | 13.00 | |||||
Forfeited
in 2009
|
- | - | ||||||
Nonvested
shares at March 31, 2009
|
250,625 | $ | 12.72 |
As of
March 31, 2009, there is approximately $3.2 million of total unrecognized
compensation costs related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements.
The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 5.61 years.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized share-based
compensation cost of approximately $184,000, each period which is included in
general and administrative expense.
14. SFAS
No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,”
requires that public companies report profits and losses and certain other
information on their “reportable operating segments” in their annual and interim
financial statements. The internal organization used by the Company’s Chief
Operating Decision Maker (CODM) to assess performance and allocate resources
determines the basis for reportable operating segments. The Company’s CODM is
the Chief Executive Officer.
Page 11
of 21
The
Company is organized into two reportable operating segments — the “Programmer’s
Paradise” segment, which sells technical software, hardware and services
directly to end-users (such as individual programmers, corporations, government
agencies, and educational institutions) and the “Lifeboat” segment, which
distributes technical software to corporate resellers, VARs, consultants and
systems integrators.
As
permitted by SFAS No. 131, the Company has utilized the aggregation
criteria in combining its operations in Canada with the domestic segments as
they provide the same products and services to similar clients and are
considered together when the CODM decides how to allocate
resources.
Segment
income is based on segment revenue less the respective segment’s cost of
revenues as well as segment direct costs (including such items as payroll costs
and payroll related costs, such as profit sharing, incentive awards and
insurance) and excluding general and administrative expenses not attributed to a
business unit. The Company only identifies accounts receivable and inventory by
segment as shown below as “Selected Assets” it does not allocate its other
assets, including capital expenditures by segment.
The
following segment reporting information of the Company is provided (in
thousands):
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
Revenue:
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Programmer’s
Paradise
|
$ | 11,507 | $ | 11,171 | ||||
Lifeboat
|
20,243 | 29,335 | ||||||
31,750 | 40,506 | |||||||
Gross
Profit:
|
||||||||
Programmer’s
Paradise
|
$ | 1,468 | $ | 1,364 | ||||
Lifeboat
|
1,999 | 2,381 | ||||||
3,467 | 3,745 | |||||||
Direct
Costs:
|
||||||||
Programmer’s
Paradise
|
$ | 670 | $ | 741 | ||||
Lifeboat
|
652 | 721 | ||||||
1,322 | 1,462 | |||||||
Income
Before Taxes:
|
||||||||
Programmer’s
Paradise
|
798 | 622 | ||||||
Lifeboat
|
1,347 | 1,661 | ||||||
Segment
Income
|
2,145 | 2,283 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,329 | 1,480 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
148 | 234 | ||||||
Foreign
currency translation gain (loss)
|
(1 | ) | 3 | |||||
Income
before taxes
|
$ | 963 | $ | 1,040 | ||||
Selected
Assets By Segment:
|
||||||||
Programmer’s
Paradise
|
$ | 11,872 | $ | 9,006 | ||||
Lifeboat
|
10,206 | 13,678 | ||||||
Corporate
Assets
|
25,574 | 29,361 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 47,652 | $ | 52,045 |
Page 12
of 21
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
The
following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contains, in addition to historical information,
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the
heading “Certain Factors Affecting Operating Results” and elsewhere in this
report and those set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and related notes and the consolidated financial statements and
related notes included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
The
Company is organized into two reportable operating segments — the “Programmer’s
Paradise” segment, which sells technical software, hardware and services
directly to end-users (such as individual programmers, corporations, government
agencies, and educational institutions) and the “Lifeboat” segment, which
distributes technical software to corporate resellers, VARs, consultants and
systems integrators.
The
Company's sales, gross profit and results of operations have fluctuated and are
expected to continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis as a result of a number
of factors, including: the loss of any major vendor, condition of the software
industry in general; shifts in demand for software products; industry shipments
of new software products or upgrades; the timing of new merchandise and catalog
offerings; fluctuations in response rates; fluctuations in postage, paper,
shipping and printing costs and in merchandise returns; adverse weather
conditions that affect response, distribution or shipping; shifts in the timing
of holidays; and changes in the Company's product offerings. The Company's
operating expenditures are based on sales forecasts. If revenues do not meet
expectations in any given quarter, operating results may be materially adversely
affected.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain financial
information derived from the Company's consolidated statements of earnings
expressed as a percentage of net sales. This comparison of financial results is
not necessarily indicative of future results:
Three
months ended
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(
unaudited)
|
||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
89.1 | 90.7 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
10.9 | 9.3 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
8.3 | 7.3 | ||||||
Income
from operations
|
2.6 | 2.0 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
0.4 | 0.6 | ||||||
Realized
foreign currency exchange gain (loss)
|
- | - | ||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
3.0 | 2.6 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
1.2 | 1.0 | ||||||
Net
income
|
1.8 | % | 1.6 | % |
Net
Sales
Net sales
for the first quarter of 2009 decreased 22% or $8.8 million to $31.8 million
compared to $40.5 million for the same period in 2008. Total sales for the first
quarter of 2009 for our Programmer’s Paradise segment were $11.5 million
compared to $11.2 million in the first quarter of 2008, representing a 3%
increase. Total sales for the first quarter of 2009 for our Lifeboat segment
were $20.2 million compared to $29.3 million in the first quarter of 2008,
representing a 31% decrease.
Page 13
of 21
The
decline in sales for our Lifeboat segment was primarily due to a decrease in
VMware sales in that segment. VMware terminated its distributor agreement with
Lifeboat Distribution, Inc. in 2008. As a result, our Lifeboat segment ceased
distributing VMware products as of October 1, 2008, the distribution of which
had accounted for $9.2 million or (31%) of segment sales in the first quarter of
2008.
In the
Programmer's Paradise segment, sales for the first quarter of 2009 increased by
$0.3 million, compared with the first quarter of 2008, primarily due to our
customer service centric sales approach, aggressive pricing and an increase in
orders by customers utilizing our flexible payment option
arrangement.
Gross
Profit
Gross
Profit for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 was $3.5 million compared to $3.7
million in the first quarter of 2008, a 7% decrease. Total gross profit for our
Programmer’s Paradise segment was $1.5 million compared to $1.4 million in the
first quarter of 2008, representing an 8% increase. Total gross profit for our
Lifeboat segment was $2.0 million compared to $2.4 million in the first quarter
of 2008, representing a 16% decrease.
Gross
profit margin, as a percentage of net sales, for the quarter ending March 31,
2009 was 10.9% compared to 9.3% in the first quarter of 2008. Gross profit
margin for our Programmer’s Paradise segment was 12.8% compared to 12.2% in the
first quarter of 2008. Gross profit margin for our Lifeboat segment was 9.9%
compared to 8.1% in the first quarter of 2008.
The
increase in gross profit margin as a percentage of net sales was primarily
caused by the decline in VMware sales which carry lower margins than our other
lines. The Lifeboat segment represented 64% of total sales in the first quarter
of 2009 compared to 72% in 2008. Gross profit margin percentage for our Lifeboat
segment was 9.9% compared to 12.8% for our Programmer’s Paradise
segment.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Total
selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") expenses for the first quarter
of 2009 were $2.7 million compared to $2.9 million in the first quarter of 2008,
mainly the result of a decrease in employee and employee related expenses of
$0.2 million in 2009 compared to 2008. As a percentage of net sales, however,
SG&A expenses for the first quarter of 2009 were 8.3% compared to 7.3% in
the first quarter of 2008, due to the decline in sales.
The
Company expects that its SG&A expenses, as a percentage of net sales, may
vary by quarter depending on changes in sales volume, as well as the levels of
continuing investments in information technology and marketing. We continue to
monitor our SG&A expenses closely.
Direct
selling costs for the first quarter of 2009 were $1.3 million compared to $1.5
million in the first quarter of 2008. Total direct selling costs for our
Programmer’s Paradise segment for the first quarter of 2009 were $0.7 million
compared to $0.7 million in 2008. Total direct selling costs for our
Lifeboat segment for the first quarter of 2009 and 2008 were $0.7
million.
Foreign
Currency Transactions Gain (Loss)
The
realized foreign exchange loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $1,000
compared to a gain of $3,000 for the same period in 2008. Foreign exchange gains
and losses primarily result from our trade activity with our Canadian
subsidiary. Although the Company does maintain bank accounts in Canadian
currencies to reduce currency exchange fluctuations, the Company is,
nevertheless, subject to risks associated with such fluctuations.
Income
Taxes
For the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes
of $385,000, which consisted of a provision of $202,000 for U.S. federal income
taxes as well as a $49,000 provision for state and local taxes and $21,000 for
Canadian taxes and a deferred tax expense of $113,000. For the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $411,000,
which consisted of a provision of $216,000 for U.S. federal income taxes as well
as a $35,000 provision for state and local taxes and $69,000 for Canadian taxes
and a deferred tax expense of $91,000.
The effective tax rates for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 was 40%.
Page 14
of 21
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
During
the first three months of 2009 our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $2.1
million to $7.2 million at March 31, 2009, from $9.3 million at December 31,
2008. During the first three months of 2009, net cash used in operating
activities amounted to $0.9 million; net cash used in investing activities
amounted to $0.5 million and net cash used in financing activities amounted to
$0.7 million.
Net cash
used in operating activities in the first three months of 2009 was $0.9 million
and primarily resulted from a $2.6 million increase in accounts receivable,
offset partially by a $0.2 million increase in accounts payable, net
income excluding non-cash charges of $0.9 million, a decrease of $0.2 million in
inventory and a decrease of $0.2 million in prepaid expenses. The $2.6 million
increase in accounts receivable primarily relates to the timing of large sales
transactions in the later part of the quarter.
Net cash
used in investing activities in the first three months of 2009 amounted to $0.5
million. This primarily resulted from net purchases of $0.4 million in
marketable securities. These securities are highly rated and highly liquid.
These securities are classified as available-for-sale securities in accordance
with SFAS 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities”, and as a result, unrealized gains and losses are reported as part
of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Cash was also used for $0.1
million of capital expenditures.
Net cash
used in financing activities in the first three months of 2009 amounted to $0.7
million. This consisted primarily of dividends paid of $0.7
million.
The
Company’s current and anticipated use of its cash and cash equivalents is, and
will continue to be, to fund working capital, operational expenditures, the
stock buyback program and dividends if declared by the board of directors. Our
business plan furthermore contemplates our continuing use of our cash
to pay vendors promptly in order to obtain more favorable
conditions.
We
believe that the funds held in cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to
fund our working capital and cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.
We currently do not have any credit facility and, in the foreseeable future, we
do not plan to enter into an agreement providing for a line of
credit.
Page 15
of 21
Contractual
Obligations as of March 31, 2009 were summarized as follows:
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Payment
due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than 1 year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
More
than 5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-Term
Debt
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Capital
Lease Obligations
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Operating
Leases (1)
|
$ | 1,354 | $ | 441 | $ | 913 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Purchase
Obligations
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Other
Long Term Obligations
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total
Contractual Obligations (2)
|
$ | 1,354 | $ | 441 | $ | 913 | $ | - | $ | - |
(1)
Operating leases primarily relates to the leases of the space used for our
operations in Shrewsbury, New Jersey, and Mississauga, Canada and our former
sales office in Hauppauge,
New York. The commitments for operating leases include the minimum rent payments
and a proportionate share of operating expenses and property taxes.
(2) In
addition to the contractual obligations disclosed in this table, we have net
unrecognized tax benefits totaling $78,000 with respect to which, based on
uncertainties associated with the items, we are unable to make reasonably
reliable estimates of the period of potential cash settlements, if any, with
taxing authorities. As a result, such potential liabilities are not listed in
the table.
The
Company is not committed by lines of credit or standby letters of credit, and
has no standby repurchase obligations or other commercial debt commitments. The
Company is not engaged in any transactions with related parties.
As of
March 31, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in
Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s
discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements that
have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial
statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company recognizes revenue
from the sale of software and hardware for microcomputers, servers and networks
upon shipment or upon electronic delivery of the product. The Company expenses
the advertising costs associated with producing its catalogs. The costs of these
catalogs are expensed in the same month the catalogs are mailed.
On an
on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to
product returns, bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, income
taxes, stock-based compensation and costs associated with exit or disposal
activities, and contingencies and litigation.
The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The
Company believes the following critical accounting policies used in the
preparation of its consolidated financial statements affect its more significant
judgments and estimates.
The
Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the
financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be
required.
Page 16
of 21
The
Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected
by management, additional inventory write-offs may be
required.
The
Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible
tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance
related to deferred tax assets. In the event the Company were to determine that
it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in
the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to income
in the period such determination was made.
Under the
fair value recognition provision stock-based compensation cost is measured at
the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense
on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting
period. We make certain assumptions in order to value and expense our various
share-based payment awards. In connection with valuing stock options, we use the
Black-Scholes model, which requires us to estimate certain subjective
assumptions. The key assumptions we make are: the expected volatility of our
stock; the expected term of the award; and the expected forfeiture rate. In
connection with our restricted stock programs we make assumptions principally
related to the forfeiture rate. We review our valuation assumptions periodically
and, as a result, we may change our valuation assumptions used to value stock
based awards granted in future periods. Such changes may lead to a significant
change in the expense we recognize in connection with share-based
payments.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”)
115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments.” This FSP changes existing guidance for determining whether an
impairment of debt securities is other than temporary. The FSP requires other
than temporary impairments to be separated into the amount representing the
decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from a security (referred to as
credit losses) which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to other
factors which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This noncredit loss
component of the impairment may only be classified in other comprehensive income
if the holder of the security concludes that it does not intend to sell and it
will not more likely than not be required to sell the security before it
recovers its value. If these conditions are not met, the noncredit loss must
also be recognized in earnings. When adopting the FSP, an entity is required to
record a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of
adoption to reclassify the noncredit component of a previously recognized other
than temporary impairment from retained earnings to accumulated other
comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Management is currently
evaluating the requirements of the FSP and has not yet determined the impact on
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides
additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of
activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to
normal market activity for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides
additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not
orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption of this FSP will
materially impact the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
FSP
107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP
107-1), increases the frequency of fair value disclosures required by Statements
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value
of Financial Instruments (SFAS No. 107). FSP 107-1 relates to fair value
disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected on
the balance sheet of companies at fair value. Prior to issuing this FSP, fair
values for these assets and liabilities were only required to be disclosed once
a year. The FSP now requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing
qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all
those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value.
Based on our evaluation of FSP 107-1, we expect to provide the disclosures
required in SFAS No. 107 in interim periods beginning in June 2009.
Page 17
of 21
Certain
Factors Affecting Operating Results
This
report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Statements in this report regarding future events or conditions, including
statements regarding industry prospects and the Company’s expected financial
position, business and financing plans, are forward-looking statements. Although
the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will
prove to have been correct. We strongly urge current and prospective investors
to carefully consider the cautionary statements and risks contained in this
report. Such risks include, but are not limited to, the continued acceptance of
the Company’s distribution channel by vendors and customers, the timely
availability and acceptance of new products, contribution of key vendor
relationships and support programs, as well as factors that affect the software
industry in general.
The
Company operates in a rapidly changing business, and new risk factors emerge
from time to time. Management cannot predict every risk factor, nor can it
assess the impact, if any, of all such risk factors on the Company’s business or
the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual
results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking
statements.
Accordingly,
forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual
results and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. The Company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Statements
concerning future sales, future gross profit margin and future results of
operations are forward looking statements involving certain risks and
uncertainties such as availability of products, product mix, market conditions
and other factors, which could result in a fluctuation of sales below recent
experience.
Stock Volatility. The
technology sector of the United States stock markets has experienced substantial
volatility in recent periods. Numerous conditions, which impact the technology
sector or the stock market in general, and/or the Company in particular, whether
or not such events relate to or reflect upon the Company's operating
performance, could adversely affect the market price of the Company's Common
Stock.
Furthermore,
fluctuations in the Company's operating results, announcements regarding
litigation, the loss of a significant vendor, increased competition, reduced
vendor incentives and trade credit, higher postage and operating expenses, and
other developments, could have a significant impact on the market price of the
Company's Common Stock.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In
addition to its activities in the United States, the Company also conducts
business in Canada. We are subject to general risks attendant to the conduct of
business in Canada, including economic uncertainties and foreign government
regulations. In addition, the Company’s Canadian business is subject to changes
in demand or pricing resulting from fluctuations in currency exchange rates or
other factors. See “Item 2 -
Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of
Operations - Foreign
Currency Transactions Gain (Loss).”
The
Company’s $9.8 million investments in marketable securities at March 31, 2009
are invested in highly rated and liquid U.S. government securities and insured
certificates of deposit investments. The remaining cash balance is invested in
short-term savings accounts with our primary bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank. As such,
the risk of significant changes in the value of our cash invested is
minimal.
Page 18
of 21
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our
management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” as of March 31,
2009.This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial
officer). As defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act,
disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures of the
Company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports
it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March
31, 2009. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based
in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how
remote.
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control
over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required
by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, that occurred during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
2- Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The table
below sets forth the purchase of Common
Stock by the Company and its affiliated purchasers during the first quarter of
2009.
ISSUER
PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Maximum
Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs
|
||||||||||||||||
Period
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
||||||||||||||||
January
1, 2009- January 31, 2009
|
- | - | - | - | 574,256 | |||||||||||||||
February
1, 2009- February 28, 2009
|
3,876 | $ | 7.06 | - | - | 574,256 | ||||||||||||||
March
1, 2009- March 31, 2009
|
- | - | - | - | 574,256 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
3,876 | $ | 7.06 | - | - | 574,256 |
(1)
Includes 3,876 shares surrendered to the Company by employees to satisfy
individual tax withholding obligations upon vesting of previously issued shares
of restricted common stock.
(2) Average
price paid per share reflects the closing price of Wayside Technology Group,
Inc. common stock on the business date the shares were surrendered by the
employee stockholder to satisfy individual tax withholding obligations upon
vesting of restricted common stock or the price of the stock paid on
the open market purchase, as applicable.
Page 19
of 21
(3) Average
price paid per share reflects the price of Wayside Technology Group, Inc. common
stock purchased on the open market.
(4) On
October 9, 2002, our Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program
whereby the Company was authorized to repurchase up to 500,000 shares of our
common stock from time to time. On July 31, 2008, the Company approved the
increase of its common stock repurchase program by 500,000 shares. The company
expects to purchase shares from time to time in the market or otherwise subject
to market conditions. The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration
date
Item
6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
31.1 Certification
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, of Simon F. Nynens, the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of the Company.
31.2 Certification
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, of Kevin T. Scull, the Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial
officer) of the Company.
32.1 Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Simon F. Nynens, the Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) of the Company.
32.2 Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Kevin T. Scull, the Chief Accounting Officer
(principal financial officer) of the Company.
Page 20
of 21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
WAYSIDE
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC
|
||||
May 12, 2009 |
|
By:
|
/s/ Simon F. Nynens | |
Date
|
Simon
F. Nynens, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|||
May 12, 2009 |
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin T. Scull | |
Date
|
Kevin
T. Scull, Vice President
and Chief Accounting Officer |
|||
Page 21
of 21