Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 28, 2008
Commission File Number 0-9286
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 56-0950585 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(704) 557-4400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at October 31, 2008 | |
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value | 6,643,677 | |
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value | 2,499,652 |
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2008
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2008
INDEX
Page | ||||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements (Unaudited) | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations | 3 | |||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 4 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity | 6 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 7 | |||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 8 | |||||
Item 2.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 36 | ||||
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 60 | ||||
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures | 61 | ||||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||||||
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors | 62 | ||||
Item 6.
|
Exhibits | 62 | ||||
Signatures | 63 |
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 381,563 | $ | 367,360 | $ | 1,115,240 | $ | 1,095,359 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
225,736 | 212,148 | 647,615 | 619,366 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
155,827 | 155,212 | 467,625 | 475,993 | ||||||||||||
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses |
149,384 | 134,972 | 421,300 | 402,710 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
6,443 | 20,240 | 46,325 | 73,283 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
9,406 | 12,135 | 29,789 | 36,647 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest |
705 | 110 | 1,726 | 1,960 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(3,668 | ) | 7,995 | 14,810 | 34,676 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
(523 | ) | 2,722 | 7,135 | 13,061 | |||||||||||
Net
income (loss) |
$ | (3,145 | ) | $ | 5,273 | $ | 7,675 | $ | 21,615 | |||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .84 | $ | 2.37 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding |
6,644 | 6,644 | 6,644 | 6,644 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .84 | $ | 2.37 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding |
2,500 | 2,480 | 2,500 | 2,480 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .84 | $ | 2.36 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding assuming dilution |
9,144 | 9,144 | 9,159 | 9,140 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .83 | $ | 2.36 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding assuming dilution |
2,500 | 2,500 | 2,515 | 2,496 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | .25 | $ | .25 | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | .25 | $ | .25 | $ | .75 | $ | .75 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
Unaudited | Unaudited | |||||||||||
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | ||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 20,583 | $ | 9,871 | $ | 88,400 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, trade, less allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1,043, $1,137 and $1,056, respectively |
105,580 | 92,499 | 96,914 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
12,661 | 3,800 | 19,768 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, other |
11,539 | 7,867 | 10,128 | |||||||||
Inventories |
65,595 | 63,534 | 62,822 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
19,334 | 20,758 | 16,000 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
235,292 | 198,329 | 294,032 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
351,575 | 359,930 | 359,391 | |||||||||
Leased property under capital leases, net |
67,763 | 70,862 | 71,896 | |||||||||
Other assets |
36,365 | 35,655 | 34,670 | |||||||||
Franchise rights, net |
520,672 | 520,672 | 520,672 | |||||||||
Goodwill, net |
102,049 | 102,049 | 102,049 | |||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
3,973 | 4,302 | 4,413 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,317,689 | $ | 1,291,799 | $ | 1,387,123 | ||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
Unaudited | Unaudited | |||||||||||
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | ||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Current
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Current portion of debt |
$ | 176,693 | $ | 7,400 | $ | 100,000 | ||||||
Current portion of obligations under capital leases |
2,735 | 2,602 | 2,559 | |||||||||
Accounts payable, trade |
37,071 | 51,323 | 38,445 | |||||||||
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
38,346 | 11,597 | 21,896 | |||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
61,654 | 54,511 | 53,993 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation |
17,563 | 23,447 | 16,652 | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
15,060 | 8,417 | 18,760 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
349,122 | 159,297 | 252,305 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
163,403 | 168,540 | 152,392 | |||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
34,560 | 32,758 | 57,064 | |||||||||
Other liabilities |
109,720 | 93,632 | 97,175 | |||||||||
Obligations under capital leases |
75,545 | 77,613 | 78,280 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
414,757 | 591,450 | 591,450 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,147,107 | 1,123,290 | 1,228,666 | |||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) |
||||||||||||
Minority interest |
49,731 | 48,005 | 47,963 | |||||||||
Stockholders
Equity: |
||||||||||||
Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
||||||||||||
Authorized - 30,000,000 shares; Issued - 9,706,051, 9,706,051 and 9,706,051 shares, respectively |
9,706 | 9,706 | 9,706 | |||||||||
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
||||||||||||
Authorized - 10,000,000 shares; Issued -3,127,766, 3,107,766 and 3,107,766 shares, respectively |
3,127 | 3,107 | 3,107 | |||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
102,449 | 102,469 | 102,003 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
79,891 | 79,227 | 83,267 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(13,068 | ) | (12,751 | ) | (26,335 | ) | ||||||
182,105 | 181,758 | 171,748 | ||||||||||
Less-Treasury stock, at cost: |
||||||||||||
Common - 3,062,374 shares |
60,845 | 60,845 | 60,845 | |||||||||
Class B Common - 628,114 shares |
409 | 409 | 409 | |||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
120,851 | 120,504 | 110,494 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,317,689 | $ | 1,291,799 | $ | 1,387,123 | ||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
Capital | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | in | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Common | Excess of | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Par Value | Earnings | Loss | Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance on
December 31, 2006 |
$ | 9,705 | $ | 3,088 | $ | 101,145 | $ | 68,495 | $ | (27,226 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 93,953 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
21,615 | 21,615 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments, net of tax |
15 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments, net of tax |
876 | 876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive
income |
22,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common ($.75 per share) |
(4,983 | ) | (4,983 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B Common ($.75 per share) |
(1,860 | ) | (1,860 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 20,000
shares of Class B
Common Stock |
20 | (20 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
878 | 878 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of Class B Common
Stock into Common Stock |
1 | (1 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance on
September 30, 2007 |
$ | 9,706 | $ | 3,107 | $ | 102,003 | $ | 83,267 | $ | (26,335 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 110,494 | ||||||||||||
Balance on
December 30, 2007 |
$ | 9,706 | $ | 3,107 | $ | 102,469 | $ | 79,227 | $ | (12,751 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 120,504 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
7,675 | 7,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments, net of tax |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments, net of tax |
(200 | ) | (200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive
income |
7,472 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to change
measurement date for
SFAS No. 158, net of tax |
(153 | ) | (114 | ) | (267 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common ($.75 per share) |
(4,983 | ) | (4,983 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B Common ($.75 per share) |
(1,875 | ) | (1,875 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 20,000
shares of Class B
Common Stock |
20 | (20 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance on
September 28, 2008 |
$ | 9,706 | $ | 3,127 | $ | 102,449 | $ | 79,891 | $ | (13,068 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 120,851 | ||||||||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
First Nine Months | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,675 | $ | 21,615 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation expense |
50,386 | 50,793 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
329 | 334 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,044 | 5,092 | ||||||
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
1,117 | 298 | ||||||
Amortization of debt costs |
1,834 | 2,051 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred gain related to terminated
interest rate agreements |
(1,311 | ) | (1,273 | ) | ||||
Provision for liabilities to exit from multi-employer pension plan |
13,812 | | ||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| 878 | ||||||
Minority interest |
1,726 | 1,960 | ||||||
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
(2,828 | ) | (9,154 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in other noncurrent assets |
(1,341 | ) | 1,499 | |||||
Decrease in other noncurrent liabilities |
(9,423 | ) | (13,330 | ) | ||||
Other |
(170 | ) | 15 | |||||
Total adjustments |
55,175 | 39,163 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
62,850 | 60,778 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
||||||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
(41,175 | ) | (30,603 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
1,126 | 7,684 | ||||||
Investment in plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative |
(968 | ) | (2,256 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(41,017 | ) | (25,175 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
||||||||
Repayments of lines of credit |
(7,400 | ) | | |||||
Cash dividends paid |
(6,858 | ) | (6,843 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
(1,935 | ) | (1,811 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from termination of interest rate swap agreements |
5,142 | | ||||||
Other |
(70 | ) | (372 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(11,121 | ) | (9,026 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash |
10,712 | 26,577 | ||||||
Cash at beginning of period |
9,871 | 61,823 | ||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 20,583 | $ | 88,400 | ||||
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of Class B Common Stock in connection with stock award |
$ | 1,171 | $ | 929 | ||||
Capital lease obligations incurred |
| 5,144 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Consolidated and its majority owned subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of
management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.
All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are consistent
with those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 30, 2007 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current classifications.
2. Seasonality of Business
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and first nine months of the fiscal year
have not been representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality
results primarily from higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third
quarters versus the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as
depreciation expense, are not significantly impacted by business seasonality.
3. Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership
On July 2, 1993, the Company and The Coca-Cola Company formed Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling
Partnership (Piedmont) to distribute and market nonalcoholic beverages primarily in portions
of North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company provides a portion of the soft drink products
to Piedmont at cost and receives a fee for managing the business of Piedmont pursuant to a
management agreement. These intercompany transactions are eliminated in the consolidated
financial statements.
Minority interest as of September 28, 2008, December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007 represents
the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola Company, which was 22.7% for all periods
presented.
8
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
4. Inventories
Inventories were summarized as follows:
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||
Finished products |
$ | 40,250 | $ | 37,649 | $ | 37,340 | ||||||
Manufacturing materials |
7,261 | 9,198 | 8,150 | |||||||||
Plastic shells, plastic pallets and other inventories |
18,084 | 16,687 | 17,332 | |||||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 65,595 | $ | 63,534 | $ | 62,822 | ||||||
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
The principal categories and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as
follows:
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | Estimated | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
Land |
$ | 12,212 | $ | 12,280 | $ | 12,280 | ||||||||||
Buildings |
110,708 | 110,721 | 110,454 | 10-50 years | ||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
118,154 | 106,180 | 103,400 | 5-20 years | ||||||||||||
Transportation equipment |
179,787 | 174,882 | 176,966 | 4-13 years | ||||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
38,877 | 38,350 | 40,363 | 4-10 years | ||||||||||||
Cold drink dispensing equipment |
327,054 | 323,629 | 325,685 | 6-13 years | ||||||||||||
Leasehold and land improvements |
60,979 | 60,023 | 59,047 | 5-20 years | ||||||||||||
Software for internal use |
58,611 | 51,681 | 49,608 | 3-10 years | ||||||||||||
Construction in progress |
4,082 | 6,635 | 3,524 | |||||||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost |
910,464 | 884,381 | 881,327 | |||||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
and amortization |
558,889 | 524,451 | 521,936 | |||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 351,575 | $ | 359,930 | $ | 359,391 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense was $50.4 million in the first nine months of 2008 (YTD
2008) and $50.8 million in the first nine months of 2007 (YTD 2007). This amount included
amortization expense for leased property under capital leases.
9
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
6. Leased Property Under Capital Leases
Leased property under capital leases was summarized as follows:
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | Estimated | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
Leased property under capital leases |
$ | 88,619 | $ | 88,619 | $ | 88,619 | 3-29 years | |||||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization |
20,856 | 17,757 | 16,723 | |||||||||||||
Leased property under capital leases, net |
$ | 67,763 | $ | 70,862 | $ | 71,896 | ||||||||||
As of September 28, 2008, real estate represented all of the leased property under capital
leases and $62.1 million of this real estate is leased from related parties as described in
Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
7. Franchise Rights and Goodwill
There
was no change in the carrying amounts of franchise rights and goodwill in the periods presented. The Company
performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill
as of the first day of the fourth quarter. During the third quarter
of 2008 (Q3 2008), the Company believes it did not experience
any events or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of the
Companys franchise rights or goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company did not perform an
interim impairment test during Q3 2008 and did not record
any impairments of franchise rights or goodwill.
8. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
Other identifiable intangible assets were summarized as follows:
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | Estimated | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets |
$ | 6,599 | $ | 6,599 | $ | 6,599 | 1-16 years | |||||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization |
2,626 | 2,297 | 2,186 | |||||||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
$ | 3,973 | $ | 4,302 | $ | 4,413 | ||||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets primarily represent customer relationships.
10
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
9. Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities were summarized as follows:
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||
Accrued marketing costs |
$ | 9,121 | $ | 6,787 | $ | 6,798 | ||||||
Accrued insurance costs |
16,558 | 14,228 | 13,392 | |||||||||
Accrued taxes (other than income taxes) |
2,517 | 502 | 2,822 | |||||||||
Accrued income taxes |
3,840 | | 3,086 | |||||||||
Employee benefit plan accruals |
11,010 | 9,933 | 8,429 | |||||||||
Checks and transfers yet to be presented for payment from
zero balance cash account |
10,235 | 13,279 | 9,958 | |||||||||
All other accrued liabilities |
8,373 | 9,782 | 9,508 | |||||||||
Total other accrued liabilities |
$ | 61,654 | $ | 54,511 | $ | 53,993 | ||||||
10. Debt
Debt was summarized as follows:
Interest | Interest | Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Maturity | Rate | Paid | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lines of Credit |
2008 | | Varies | $ | | $ | 7,400 | $ | | |||||||||||||||
Debentures |
2007 | | Semi-annually | | | 100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debentures |
2009 | 7.20 | % | Semi-annually | 57,440 | 57,440 | 57,440 | |||||||||||||||||
Debentures |
2009 | 6.375 | % | Semi-annually | 119,253 | 119,253 | 119,253 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes |
2012 | 5.00 | % | Semi-annually | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes |
2015 | 5.30 | % | Semi-annually | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes |
2016 | 5.00 | % | Semi-annually | 164,757 | 164,757 | 164,757 | |||||||||||||||||
591,450 | 598,850 | 691,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Current portion of debt |
176,693 | 7,400 | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 414,757 | $ | 591,450 | $ | 591,450 | ||||||||||||||||||
11
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
10. Debt
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into a $200 million revolving credit facility (the $200
million facility), replacing its $100 million facility. The $200 million facility matures in
March 2012 and includes an option to extend the term for an additional year at the discretion of
the participating banks. The $200 million facility bears interest at a floating base rate or a
floating rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of .35%,
dependent on the length of the term of the borrowing. In addition, the Company must pay an
annual facility fee of .10% of the lenders aggregate commitments under the facility. Both the
interest rate spread and the facility fee are determined from a commonly-used pricing grid based on
the Companys long-term senior unsecured debt rating. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants:
a fixed charge coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as defined in the
credit agreement. On August 25, 2008, the Company entered into
an amendment to the $200 million facility. The amendment clarified that charges incurred by the
Company resulting from the Companys withdrawal from the Central States, Southeast and Southwest
Areas Pension Fund (Central States) would be excluded from the calculations of the financial
covenants to the extent they are recognized before March
29, 2009 and do not exceed $15 million. See Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements for
additional details on the withdrawal. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants. On September 28,
2008, December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the
$200 million facility.
Prior to October 3, 2008, the Company borrowed periodically under uncommitted lines of credit from
certain banks participating in the $200 million facility. These uncommitted lines of credit were
made available at the discretion of participating banks and have since been terminated. On
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007, there were no amounts outstanding under the uncommitted
lines of credit and there was $35 million and $60 million
available, respectively. On December 30, 2007, $7.4 million was outstanding under uncommitted lines of
credit of $60 million available.
After taking into account all of its interest rate hedging activities, the Company had a weighted
average interest rate of 5.9%, 6.2% and 6.7% for its debt and capital lease obligations as of
September 28, 2008, December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively. The Companys overall
weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 5.7% for YTD 2008
compared to 6.7% for YTD 2007. As of September 28, 2008, approximately 6% of the Companys debt
and capital lease obligations of $669.7 million was subject to changes in short-term interest
rates.
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as the incurrence of indebtedness by the Companys
subsidiaries in excess of certain amounts.
All of the outstanding long-term debt has been issued by the Company with none being issued by any
of the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt.
12
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
On September 18, 2008, the Company terminated six outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of $225 million receiving $6.2 million in cash proceeds including $1.1 million for
previously accrued interest receivable. After accounting for
previously accrued interest receivable, the Company will
amortize a gain of $5.1 million over the remaining term of the underlying debt. All of the
Companys interest rate swap agreements were LIBOR-based.
Derivative financial instruments were summarized as follows:
September 28, 2008 | December 30, 2007 | September 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Notional | Remaining | Notional | Remaining | Notional | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Amount | Term | Amount | Term | Amount | Term | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
$ | | | $ | | | $ | 25,000 | 0.2 years | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | | | 25,000 | 0.2 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | | | 50,000 | 0.2 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | 50,000 | 1.4 years | 50,000 | 1.7 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | 50,000 | 1.5 years | 50,000 | 1.8 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | 50,000 | 4.9 years | 50,000 | 5.2 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | 25,000 | 1.3 years | 25,000 | 1.6 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | 25,000 | 7.2 years | 25,000 | 7.5 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreement floating |
| | 25,000 | 4.9 years | 25,000 | 5.2 years |
The counterparties to these contractual arrangements were major financial institutions with which
the Company also has other financial relationships. The Company used several different financial
institutions for interest rate derivative contracts to minimize the concentration of credit risk.
While the Company was exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these
counterparties, the Company did not anticipate nonperformance by
these parties. The Company had
master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provided for
net settlement of the derivative transactions.
During the first quarter of 2007, the Company began using derivative instruments to hedge the
majority of its vehicle fuel purchases. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel and
unleaded gasoline used in the Companys operations. Derivative instruments used include puts,
calls and caps which effectively establish an upper and lower limit on the Companys price of fuel
within periods covered by the instruments. The Company currently accounts for its fuel hedges on a
mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an
adjustment of fuel costs. The fuel hedging agreements expired at the
end of Q3 2008.
13
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
The net impact of the fuel hedges was to increase fuel costs by $0.6 million and $0.1 million in
Q3 2008 and Q3 2007, respectively. The net impact of the fuel hedges was to decrease fuel costs
by $1.2 million and $0.7 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively.
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of
its financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these items.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these items.
Public
Debt Securities
The fair values of the Companys public debt securities are based on estimated market prices.
The fair values of the Companys public debt securities are based on estimated market prices.
Non-Public
Variable Rate Debt
The carrying amounts of the Companys variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values.
The carrying amounts of the Companys variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values.
Deferred
Compensation Plan Assets
The fair values of deferred compensation plan assets, which are held in mutual funds, are based upon the quoted market value of the securities held within the mutual funds.
The fair values of deferred compensation plan assets, which are held in mutual funds, are based upon the quoted market value of the securities held within the mutual funds.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The fair values for the Companys interest rate swap and fuel hedging agreements are based on current settlement values.
The fair values for the Companys interest rate swap and fuel hedging agreements are based on current settlement values.
Letters
of Credit
The fair values of the Companys letters of credit, obtained from financial institutions, are based on the notional amounts of the instruments. These letters of credit primarily relate to the Companys property and casualty insurance programs.
The fair values of the Companys letters of credit, obtained from financial institutions, are based on the notional amounts of the instruments. These letters of credit primarily relate to the Companys property and casualty insurance programs.
14
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys debt, deferred compensation plan assets,
derivative financial instruments and letters of credit were as follows:
September 28, 2008 | December 30, 2007 | September 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Amount | Value | Amount | Value | Amount | Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Public debt securities |
$ | 591,450 | $ | 550,420 | $ | 591,450 | $ | 575,833 | $ | 691,450 | $ | 676,324 | ||||||||||||
Non-public variable rate debt |
| | 7,400 | 7,400 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan assets |
6,444 | 6,444 | 6,386 | 6,386 | 6,252 | 6,252 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements |
| | (2,337 | ) | (2,337 | ) | 2,353 | 2,353 | ||||||||||||||||
Fuel hedging agreements |
| | (340 | ) | (340 | ) | | (154 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
| 19,332 | | 21,389 | | 21,271 |
On September 18, 2008, the Company terminated all of its outstanding interest rate swap
agreements. The fair value of interest rate swap agreements at
December 30, 2007 represented the
estimated amount the Company would have received upon termination of these agreements. The fair
value increased to $6.2 million at the date the interest rate swap agreements were terminated.
The fair value on September 30, 2007 represented the estimated amount the Company would have paid
upon the termination of these agreements.
The fair values of the fuel hedging agreements at December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007
represented the estimated amount the Company would have received upon termination of these
agreements.
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurement
(SFAS No. 157) as of the beginning of the first quarter of 2008 (Q1 2008), and there was no
material impact to the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 157 currently applies to all
financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or
disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, which defers the application date of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and liabilities until the first quarter of 2009 except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. SFAS No.
157 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is intended to enable the readers of
financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a
hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair
values. SFAS No. 157 requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and
disclosed in one of the following categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
15
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following table summarizes the valuation of deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities
by the above categories as of September 28, 2008:
In Thousands | Level 1 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Deferred compensation plan assets |
$ | 6,444 | ||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred compensation plan liabilities |
6,444 |
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other
highly compensated employees. The investment assets are held in mutual funds. The fair value of
the mutual funds is based on the quoted market value of the securities held within the funds (Level
1). The related deferred compensation liability represents the fair value of the investment
assets.
13. Other Liabilities
Other liabilities were summarized as follows:
Sept. 28, | Dec. 30, | Sept. 30, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||
Accruals for executive benefit plans |
$ | 77,601 | $ | 75,438 | $ | 74,462 | ||||||
Other |
32,119 | 18,194 | 22,713 | |||||||||
Total other liabilities |
$ | 109,720 | $ | 93,632 | $ | 97,175 | ||||||
14. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is a member of South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (SAC), a manufacturing cooperative from
which it is obligated to purchase 17.5 million cases of finished product on an annual basis
through May 2014. The Company is also a member of Southeastern Container (Southeastern), a
plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative from which it is obligated to purchase at least 80% of
its requirements of plastic bottles for certain designated territories. See Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning SAC and Southeastern.
The Company guarantees a portion of SACs and Southeasterns debt and lease obligations. The
amounts guaranteed were $42.1 million, $45.4 million and $43.0 million as of September 28, 2008,
December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively. The Company has not recorded any liability
associated with these guarantees. The Company holds no assets as collateral against these
guarantees. The guarantees relate to the debt and lease obligations of SAC and Southeastern,
which resulted primarily from the purchase of production equipment and facilities. These
guarantees expire at various times through 2021. The members of both cooperatives consist solely
of Coca-Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives
16
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
14. Commitments and Contingencies
will fail to fulfill their commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives
has sufficient assets, including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the
ability to adjust selling prices of their products which adequately mitigate the risk of material
loss from the Companys guarantees.
In the event either of these cooperatives fails to fulfill its commitments under the related debt
and lease obligations, the Company would be responsible for payments to the lenders up to the
level of the guarantees. If these cooperatives had borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, the
Companys maximum exposure under these guarantees on
September 28, 2008 would have been $25.2 million each for SAC
and Southeastern and the Companys maximum total exposure, including its equity investment, would have been
$29.2 million for SAC and $36.3 million for Southeastern.
The
Company has been purchasing plastic bottles from Southeastern and
finished products from SAC for
more than ten years.
The Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities in addition to the guarantees of
certain indebtedness. As of September 28, 2008, SAC had total assets of approximately $41 million
and total debt of approximately $21 million. SAC had total revenues for YTD 2008 of approximately
$144 million. As of September 28, 2008, Southeastern had total assets of approximately $395
million and total debt of approximately $248 million. Southeastern had total revenue for YTD 2008
of approximately $446 million.
The Company has standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty
insurance programs. On September 28, 2008, these letters of credit totaled $19.3 million.
The Company participates in long-term marketing contractual arrangements with certain prestige
properties, athletic venues and other locations. The future payments related to these contractual
arrangements as of September 28, 2008 amounted to $25.7 million and expire at various dates
through 2018.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary
course of its business. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims
and legal proceedings, management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, cash flows or results of operations of the
Company. No material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is believed to be reasonably
possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings.
The Company is subject to audit by tax authorities in jurisdictions where it conducts business.
These audits may result in assessments that are subsequently resolved with the tax authorities or
potentially through the courts. Management believes the Company has adequately provided for any
assessments that are likely to result from these audits; however, final assessments, if any, could
be different than the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
17
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
15. Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for YTD 2008 and YTD 2007 was 48.2% and 37.7%,
respectively.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the income tax expense (benefit) at the statutory
federal rate to actual income tax expense.
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Statutory expense |
$ | 5,184 | $ | 12,137 | ||||
State income taxes, net of federal effect |
645 | 1,510 | ||||||
Manufacturing deduction benefit |
(487 | ) | (1,141 | ) | ||||
Meals and entertainment |
507 | 440 | ||||||
Adjustment
for uncertain tax positions |
1,277 | (75 | ) | |||||
Other, net |
9 | 190 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 7,135 | $ | 13,061 | ||||
In June 2006, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized by prescribing a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and
disclosure. In May 2007, FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FSP FIN 48-1). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on whether a tax
position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax
benefits. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1 effective as of January 1,
2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48 and FSP FIN 48-1, the Company recognized no
material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits. As of December 30,
2007, the Company had $9.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest, of
which $8.0 million would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. As of September
28, 2008, the Company had $10.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest,
of which $9.3 million would affect the Companys effective
rate if recognized. It is expected that
the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next 12 months. During this period, it
is reasonably possible that tax audits could reduce unrecognized tax benefits. The Company cannot
reasonably estimate the change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits until further information
is made available during the progress of the audits.
The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
income tax expense. As of December 30, 2007, the Company had approximately $2.0 million of accrued
interest related to uncertain tax positions. As of September 28, 2008, the Company had
approximately $2.4 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. Income tax
expense included interest of approximately $.4 million in both YTD 2008 and YTD 2007.
18
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
15. Income Taxes
Various tax years from 1990 remain open due to loss carryforwards in certain state jurisdictions.
The tax years 2005 through 2007 remain open to examination by taxing jurisdictions to which the
Company is subject.
The Companys income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based
on the Companys ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that
becomes available to the Company.
19
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of adjustments relative to the Companys pension
and postretirement medical benefit plans and foreign currency translation adjustments required for
a subsidiary of the Company that performs data analysis and provides consulting services in Europe.
A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss is as follows:
Application of | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 30, | SFAS No. 158 | Pre-tax | Tax | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2007 | After tax(1) | Activity | Effect | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Net pension activity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
$ | (12,684 | ) | $ | 23 | $ | 333 | $ | (128 | ) | $ | (12,456 | ) | |||||||
Prior service costs |
(55 | ) | 1 | 12 | (5 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(9,928 | ) | 141 | 687 | (264 | ) | (9,364 | ) | ||||||||||||
Prior service costs |
9,833 | (275 | ) | (1,338 | ) | 514 | 8,734 | |||||||||||||
Transition asset |
60 | (4 | ) | (18 | ) | 7 | 45 | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
23 | | (5 | ) | 2 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (12,751 | ) | $ | (114 | ) | $ | (329 | ) | $ | 126 | $ | (13,068 | ) | ||||||
Dec. 31, | Pre-tax | Tax | Sept. 30, | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2006 | Activity | Effect | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net pension activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
$ | (24,673 | ) | $ | 1,868 | $ | (735 | ) | $ | (23,540 | ) | |||||
Prior service costs |
(31 | ) | 18 | (7 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||||
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(13,512 | ) | 916 | (360 | ) | (12,956 | ) | |||||||||
Prior service costs |
10,915 | (1,339 | ) | 527 | 10,103 | |||||||||||
Transition asset |
75 | (19 | ) | 7 | 63 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| 22 | (7 | ) | 15 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | (27,226 | ) | $ | 1,466 | $ | (575 | ) | $ | (26,335 | ) | |||||
(1) | See Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information. |
17. Capital Transactions
The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.
The Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Marketsm under the symbol COKE.
There is no established public trading market for the Class B Common Stock. Shares of the Class B
Common Stock are convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock at any time at
the option of the holders of Class B Common Stock.
20
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
No cash dividend or dividend of property or stock other than stock of the Company, as specifically
described in the Companys certificate of incorporation, may be declared and paid on the Class B
Common Stock unless an equal or greater dividend is declared and paid on the Common Stock. During
YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, dividends of $.75 per share were declared and paid on both Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock.
Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B Common
Stock is entitled to 20 votes per share at all meetings of stockholders. Except as otherwise
required by law, holders of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote together as a single
class on all matters brought before the Companys stockholders. In the event of liquidation,
there is no preference between the two classes of common stock.
On May 12, 1999, the stockholders of the Company approved a restricted stock award for J. Frank
Harrison, III, the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer,
consisting of 200,000 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock. Under the award, shares of
restricted stock are granted at a rate of 20,000 shares per year over a ten-year period. The
vesting of each annual installment is contingent upon the Company achieving at least 80% of the
overall goal achievement factor in the Companys Annual Bonus Plan. The restricted stock award
does not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in dividend or voting rights until each
installment has vested and the shares are issued. On February 28, 2007, the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors determined 20,000 shares of restricted Class B Common Stock vested and
should be issued to Mr. Harrison, III for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. On February 27,
2008, the Compensation Committee determined an additional 20,000 shares of restricted Class B
Common Stock vested and should be issued to Mr. Harrison, III for the fiscal year ended December
30, 2007.
The Companys only active share-based compensation is the restricted stock award to Mr. Harrison,
III, as previously described. Each annual 20,000 share tranche has an independent performance
requirement as it is not established until the Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets are approved
each year by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. As a result, each
20,000 share tranche is considered to have its own service inception date, grant-date fair value
and requisite service period. The Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets, which establish the
performance requirement for the restricted stock awards, are approved by the Compensation Committee
in the first quarter of each year.
A summary of restricted stock awards is as follows:
Potential | Recorded | |||||||||||||||
Annual | Nine Month | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Grant-Date | Compensation | Compensation | |||||||||||||
Year | Awarded | Price | Expense | Expense | ||||||||||||
2007 |
20,000 | $ | 58.53 | $ | 1,170,600 | $ | 877,950 | |||||||||
2008 |
20,000 | 56.50 | 1,130,000 | |
21
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
The Company currently estimates it will not achieve at least 80% of the overall goal achievement
factor in the Companys 2008 Annual Bonus Plan required for the restricted stock award to vest.
Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recorded in Q3 2008 or YTD 2008, based upon the
Companys estimate. The Company reimburses Mr. Harrison, III for income taxes to be paid on the
shares if the performance requirement is met and the shares are issued. The Company accrues the
estimated cost of the income tax reimbursement, if necessary, over the one-year service period.
On April 29, 2008, the stockholders of the Company approved a Performance Unit Award Agreement for
Mr. Harrison, III consisting of 400,000 performance units (Units). Each Unit represents the
right to receive one share of the Companys Class B Common Stock, subject to certain terms and
conditions. The Units will vest in annual increments over a ten-year period starting in fiscal
year 2009. The number of Units that vest each year will equal the product of 40,000 multiplied by
the overall goal achievement factor (not to exceed 100%) under the Companys Annual Bonus Plan.
The Performance Unit Award Agreement will replace the restricted stock award discussed above which
expires at the end of 2008 and will not affect the Companys results of operations or financial
position for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2008.
The increase in the number of shares outstanding in YTD 2008 was due to the issuance of 20,000
shares of Class B Common Stock related to the restricted stock award. The increase in the number
of shares in YTD 2007 was due to the issuance of 20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock related to
the restricted stock award and the conversion of 500 shares from Class B Common Stock to Common
Stock.
18. Benefit Plans
Recently Adopted Pronouncement
In September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS No. 158), which was
effective for the year ending December 31, 2006 except for the requirement that the benefit plan
assets and obligations be measured as of the date of the employers statement of financial
position, which is effective for the year ending December 28, 2008. The Company adopted the
measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 on the first day of Q1 2008 and used the one
measurement approach. The incremental effect of applying the measurement date provisions on the
balance sheet in Q1 2008 was as follows:
22
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
Before | After | |||||||||||
Application of | Application of | |||||||||||
In Thousands | SFAS No. 158 | Adjustment | SFAS No. 158 | |||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
$ | 32,758 | $ | 434 | $ | 33,192 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
168,540 | (167 | ) | 168,373 | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,123,290 | 267 | 1,123,557 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
79,227 | (153 | ) | 79,074 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(12,751 | ) | (114 | ) | (12,865 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
120,504 | (267 | ) | 120,237 |
Pension Plans
Retirement benefits under the two Company-sponsored pension plans are based on the employees
length of service, average compensation over the five consecutive years that give the highest
average compensation and average Social Security taxable wage base during the 35-year period
before reaching Social Security retirement age. Contributions to the plans are based on the
projected unit credit actuarial funding method and are limited to the amounts currently deductible
for income tax purposes. On February 22, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an
amendment to the principal Company-sponsored pension plan to cease further benefit accruals under
the plan effective June 30, 2006.
The components of net periodic pension cost (income) were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 20 | $ | 20 | $ | 61 | $ | 59 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
2,701 | 2,634 | 8,104 | 7,902 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(3,410 | ) | (3,224 | ) | (10,231 | ) | (9,674 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
4 | 6 | 12 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
111 | 623 | 333 | 1,868 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost (income) |
$ | (574 | ) | $ | 59 | $ | (1,721 | ) | $ | 173 | ||||||
The Company contributed $0.2 million to one of its Company-sponsored pension plans during Q3 2008.
The Company does not expect to contribute to either of its two Company-sponsored pension plans
during the remainder of 2008.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides postretirement benefits for a portion of its current employees. The Company
recognizes the cost of postretirement benefits, which consist principally of medical benefits,
during employees periods of active service. The Company does not pre-fund these benefits and has
the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefits in the future.
23
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 128 | $ | 107 | $ | 384 | $ | 319 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
536 | 552 | 1,608 | 1,657 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized transitional assets |
(6 | ) | (7 | ) | (18 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
229 | 306 | 687 | 916 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
(446 | ) | (447 | ) | (1,338 | ) | (1,339 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
$ | 441 | $ | 511 | $ | 1,323 | $ | 1,534 | ||||||||
401(k) Savings Plan
The Company provides a 401(k) Savings Plan for substantially all of its employees who are not part
of collective bargaining agreements. The total cost for this benefit in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007 was
$7.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively.
Multi-Employer
Benefits
The Company entered into a new agreement in Q3 2008 when one of its collective bargaining contracts
expired in July 2008.
The new agreement allows the Company to freeze its liability to the
Central States, a
multi-employer defined benefit pension fund, while preserving the
pension benefits previously earned by the employees. As a result of
freezing the Companys liability to the Central States, the
Company recorded a charge of $13.8 million in Q3 2008.
The Company has paid $3.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 to
the Southern States Savings and Retirement Plan (Southern
States) under the agreement to freeze the
Central States liability.
The remaining $10.8 million is the present
value amount, using a discount rate of 7%, that will be paid to the
Central States and has been recorded in other liabilities.
The Company will pay approximately $1 million annually over the next
20 years. In addition, the Company will make future
contributions on behalf of these employees to the Southern States.
19. Related Party Transactions
The Companys business consists primarily of the production, marketing and distribution of
nonalcoholic beverages of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole owner of the secret formulas
under which the primary components (either concentrate or syrup) of its beverage products are
manufactured. As of September 28, 2008, The Coca-Cola Company had a 27.1% interest in the
Companys total outstanding Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on a combined basis.
24
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
The following table summarizes the significant transactions between the Company and The Coca-Cola
Company:
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Millions | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Payments by the Company for concentrate, syrup,
sweetener and other purchases |
$ | 285.7 | $ | 254.4 | ||||
Marketing funding support payments to the Company |
35.2 | 28.4 | ||||||
Payments by the Company net of marketing funding support |
$ | 250.5 | $ | 226.0 | ||||
Payments by the Company for customer marketing programs |
$ | 37.1 | $ | 35.0 | ||||
Payments by the Company for cold drink equipment parts |
5.3 | 4.2 | ||||||
Fountain delivery and equipment repair fees paid to the Company |
7.6 | 7.1 | ||||||
Presence marketing funding support provided by
The Coca-Cola Company on the Companys behalf |
3.0 | 3.2 | ||||||
Sales of finished products to The Coca-Cola Company |
7.8 | 24.8 | ||||||
The Company has a production arrangement with Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (CCE) to buy and sell
finished products at cost. Sales to CCE under this arrangement were $28.3 million and $31.9
million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively. Purchases from CCE under this arrangement were
$15.2 million and $10.4 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively. The Coca-Cola Company has
significant equity interests in the Company and CCE. As of September 28, 2008, CCE held 9% of the
Companys outstanding Common Stock and held no shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock.
Along with all other Coca-Cola bottlers in the United States, the Company is a member in Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company, LLC (CCBSS), which was formed in 2003 for the
purposes of facilitating various procurement functions and distributing certain specified beverage
products of The Coca-Cola Company with the intention of enhancing the efficiency and
competitiveness of the Coca-Cola bottling system in the United States. CCBSS negotiates the
procurement for the majority of the Companys raw materials (excluding concentrate). The Company
pays an administrative fee to CCBSS for its services.
The Company is a member of SAC, a manufacturing cooperative. SAC sells finished products to the
Company and Piedmont at cost. Purchases from SAC by the Company and Piedmont for finished products
were $111.5 million and $112.8 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively. The
Company also manages the
25
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
operations of SAC pursuant to a management agreement. Management fees earned from SAC were $1.1
million in YTD 2008 and $1.0 million in YTD 2007. The Company has also guaranteed a portion of
debt for SAC. Such guarantee amounted to $21.4 million as of September 28, 2008. The Companys
equity investment in SAC was $4.1 million, $4.0 million and $4.0 million as of September 28, 2008,
December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively.
The Company is a shareholder in two entities from which it purchases substantially all its
requirements for plastic bottles. Net purchases from these entities were $54.3 million and $51.9
million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively. In connection with its participation in one of
these entities, the Company has guaranteed a portion of the entitys debt. Such guarantee amounted
to $20.7 million as of September 28, 2008. The Companys equity investment in one of these
entities, Southeastern, was $11.0 million, $7.4 million and $6.3 million as of September 28, 2008,
December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively
The Company monitors its investments in cooperatives and would be required to write down its
investment if an impairment is identified and determined to be other
than temporary. No impairment of the Companys investments in
cooperatives has
been identified as of September 28, 2008.
The Company recorded an adjustment to its equity investment in Southeastern in the second quarter
of 2008 which resulted in a nonrecurring pre-tax credit of $2.6 million. This adjustment was based
on information received from Southeastern during the quarter and reflected a higher share of
Southeasterns retained earnings compared to the amount previously recorded. The Company
classifies its equity in earnings of Southeastern in cost of sales consistent with the
classification of purchases from Southeastern.
The Company leases from Harrison Limited Partnership One (HLP) the Snyder Production Center and
an adjacent sales facility, which are located in Charlotte, North
Carolina. The lease expires on December 31, 2010. HLP is directly and
indirectly owned by trusts of which J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Deborah S. Harrison, a director of the Company, are
trustees and beneficiaries. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease as of
September 28, 2008 was $37.9 million. Rental payments related to this lease were $2.8 million and
$3.2 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively.
The Company leases from Beacon Investment Corporation (Beacon) the Companys headquarters office
facility and an adjacent office facility. The lease expires on
December 31, 2021. Beacons sole shareholder is J. Frank Harrison, III.
The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease as of September 28, 2008 was $33.1
million. Rental payments related to the lease were $2.8 million and $2.7 million in YTD 2008 and
YTD 2007, respectively.
26
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
20. Net Sales by Product Category
Net sales by product category were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Bottle/can sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
$ | 258,200 | $ | 255,804 | $ | 762,741 | $ | 760,359 | ||||||||
Still beverages |
66,160 | 58,897 | 186,020 | 158,280 | ||||||||||||
Total bottle/can sales |
324,360 | 314,701 | 948,761 | 918,639 | ||||||||||||
Other sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
31,231 | 27,804 | 94,356 | 101,774 | ||||||||||||
Post-mix and other |
25,972 | 24,855 | 72,123 | 74,946 | ||||||||||||
Total other sales |
57,203 | 52,659 | 166,479 | 176,720 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 381,563 | $ | 367,360 | $ | 1,115,240 | $ | 1,095,359 | ||||||||
Sparkling beverages are primarily carbonated beverages while still beverages are primarily
noncarbonated beverages.
27
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income (loss) per share and diluted net
income (loss) per share under the two-class method:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (3,145 | ) | $ | 5,273 | $ | 7,675 | $ | 21,615 | |||||||
Less dividends: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
1,661 | 1,661 | 4,983 | 4,983 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
625 | 620 | 1,875 | 1,860 | ||||||||||||
Total undistributed earnings (losses) |
$ | (5,431 | ) | $ | 2,992 | $ | 817 | $ | 14,772 | |||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
$ | (3,946 | ) | $ | 2,179 | $ | 594 | $ | 10,757 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
(1,485 | ) | 813 | 223 | 4,015 | |||||||||||
Total undistributed earnings (losses) basic |
$ | (5,431 | ) | $ | 2,992 | $ | 817 | $ | 14,772 | |||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses) diluted |
$ | (3,946 | ) | $ | 2,174 | $ | 593 | $ | 10,738 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings
(losses) diluted |
(1,485 | ) | 818 | 224 | 4,034 | |||||||||||
Total undistributed earnings (losses) diluted |
$ | (5,431 | ) | $ | 2,992 | $ | 817 | $ | 14,772 | |||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Common Stock |
$ | 1,661 | $ | 1,661 | $ | 4,983 | $ | 4,983 | ||||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses) basic |
(3,946 | ) | 2,179 | 594 | 10,757 | |||||||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock share |
$ | (2,285 | ) | $ | 3,840 | $ | 5,577 | $ | 15,740 | |||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
$ | 625 | $ | 620 | $ | 1,875 | $ | 1,860 | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
(1,485 | ) | 813 | 223 | 4,015 | |||||||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share |
$ | (860 | ) | $ | 1,433 | $ | 2,098 | $ | 5,875 | |||||||
28
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per
Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Common Stock |
$ | 1,661 | $ | 1,661 | $ | 4,983 | $ | 4,983 | ||||||||
Dividends on Class B Common Stock
assumed converted to Common Stock |
625 | 620 | 1,875 | 1,860 | ||||||||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
diluted |
(5,431 | ) | 2,992 | 817 | 14,772 | |||||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per
Common Stock share |
$ | (3,145 | ) | $ | 5,273 | $ | 7,675 | $ | 21,615 | |||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
$ | 625 | $ | 620 | $ | 1,875 | $ | 1,860 | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
diluted |
(1,485 | ) | 818 | 224 | 4,034 | |||||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share |
$ | (860 | ) | $ | 1,438 | $ | 2,099 | $ | 5,894 | |||||||
29
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
6,644 | 6,644 | 6,644 | 6,644 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
2,500 | 2,480 | 2,500 | 2,480 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted (assumes conversion of
Class B Common Stock to Common Stock) |
9,144 | 9,144 | 9,159 | 9,140 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted |
2,500 | 2,500 | 2,515 | 2,496 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .84 | $ | 2.37 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .84 | $ | 2.37 | |||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .84 | $ | 2.36 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | .83 | $ | 2.36 | |||||||
NOTES TO TABLE | ||
(1) | For purposes of the diluted net income (loss) per share computation for Common Stock, shares
of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be converted; therefore, 100% of undistributed earnings
is allocated to Common Stock. |
|
(2) | For purposes of the diluted net income (loss) per share computation for Class B Common Stock,
weighted average shares of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be outstanding for the entire
period and not converted. |
|
(3) | Denominator for diluted net income per share for Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
includes the dilutive effect of shares relative to the restricted
stock award. |
30
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
22. Risks and Uncertainties
Approximately
89% of the Companys YTD 2008 bottle/can volume to retail
customers were products of
The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of the concentrates or syrups required to
manufacture these products. The remaining 11% of the Companys YTD 2008 bottle/can volume to
retail customers were products of other beverage companies and the Company. The Company has
bottling contracts under which it has various requirements to meet. Failure to meet the
requirements of these bottling contracts could result in the loss of distribution rights for the
respective product.
The Companys products are sold and distributed directly by its employees to retail stores and
other outlets. During YTD 2008, approximately 68% of the Companys bottle/can volume to retail
customers was sold for future consumption. The remaining bottle/can volume to retail customers of
approximately 32% was sold for immediate consumption. The Companys largest customers, Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 19% and 12% of the Companys total
bottle/can volume to retail customers during YTD 2008, respectively. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
accounted for approximately 14% of the Companys total net sales during YTD 2008.
The Company obtains all of its aluminum cans from one domestic supplier. The Company currently
obtains all of its plastic bottles from two domestic entities. See Note 19 of the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
The Company is exposed to price risk on such commodities as aluminum, corn and resin which affects
the cost of raw materials used in the production of finished products. The Company both produces
and procures these finished products. Examples of the raw materials
affected are aluminum cans and plastic bottles used for
packaging and high fructose corn syrup used as a product ingredient. Further, the Company is exposed to commodity price risk on oil which impacts the
Companys cost of fuel used in the movement and delivery of the Companys products. The Company
participates in commodity hedging and risk mitigation programs administered both by CCBSS and by
the Company itself.
High fructose corn syrup costs increased significantly during YTD 2008 as a result of increasing
demand for corn products around the world for such purposes as ethanol production. The combined impact of
increasing costs for aluminum cans and high fructose corn syrup increased cost of sales during YTD
2008. In addition, there is no limit on the price The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage
companies can charge for concentrate.
Certain liabilities of the Company are subject to risk due to changes in both long-term and
short-term interest rates. These liabilities include floating rate debt, leases with payments
determined on floating interest rates, postretirement benefit obligations and the Companys pension
liability.
Approximately 7% of the Companys labor force was covered by collective bargaining agreements as of
September 28, 2008. One collective bargaining contract covering approximately 4% of the Companys
employees expired on July 12, 2008, and the Company entered into a new agreement in Q3 2008.
31
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
23. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Changes in current assets and current liabilities affecting cash were as follows:
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, trade, net |
$ | (13,081 | ) | $ | (5,615 | ) | ||
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
(8,861 | ) | (14,853 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable, other |
(3,672 | ) | (1,563 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(2,061 | ) | 4,233 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,259 | (2,564 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable, trade |
(14,252 | ) | (5,605 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
26,749 | 148 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
10,332 | 10,932 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
(5,884 | ) | (3,019 | ) | ||||
Accrued interest payable |
6,643 | 8,752 | ||||||
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
$ | (2,828 | ) | $ | (9,154 | ) | ||
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 158 which was effective for the year ending December 31,
2006 except for the requirement that benefit plan assets and obligations be measured as of the date
of the employers statement of financial position, which was effective for the year ending December
28, 2008. The impact of the adoption of the change in measurement dates was not material to the
consolidated financial statements. See Note 16 and Note 18 of the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. The Statement does not require any new fair value measurements but
could change the
32
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
current practices in measuring current fair value measurements. The Statement was effective at
the beginning of Q1 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of this
Statement did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 12 of
the consolidated financial statements for additional information. In February 2008, FASB issued
FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which defers
the application date of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and
liabilities until the first quarter of 2009 except for items that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact, if any, related to the Companys nonfinancial assets and liabilities not
valued on a recurring basis.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. This Statement was effective at the beginning
of Q1 2008. The Company has not applied the fair value option to any of its outstanding
instruments; therefore, the Statement did not have an impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No.
51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary
(commonly referred to as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The
Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company
anticipates that the adoption of this Statement will not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements, although changes in financial statement
presentation will be required.
In December 2007, FASB revised SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). This
Statement established principles and requirements for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets
and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at
their fair values as of the acquisition date. The Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The impact on the Company of adopting SFAS No. 141(R)
will depend on the nature, terms and size of business combinations completed after the effective
date.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). This Statement amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of
why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for and how they affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The Statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after
November 15, 2008. The adoption of this
33
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
Statement will not impact the consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote
disclosures related to derivative instruments and related hedged items.
In April 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors to be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of intangible assets under SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the
consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows
used to measure its fair value. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 142-3, but does not expect
it to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This Statement
is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commissions approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not expect the
Statement to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In September 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures About
Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45, and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161 (FSP
133-1). FSP 133-1 amends Statement 133 to require a seller of credit derivatives to provide
certain disclosures for each credit derivative (or group of similar credit derivatives). FSP 133-1
also amends Interpretation 45 to require guarantors to disclose the current status of
payment/performance risk of guarantees and clarifies the effective date of SFAS No. 161. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 133-1, but does not expect it to have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
25. Restructuring Expenses
On February 2, 2007, the Company initiated plans to simplify its operating management structure and
reduce its workforce in order to improve operating efficiencies across the Companys business. The
restructuring expenses consisted primarily of one-time termination benefits and other associated
costs, primarily relocation expenses for certain employees. During YTD 2007, the Company incurred
$2.6 million in pre-tax restructuring expenses. Total pre-tax
restructuring expenses under these
plans were $2.8 million, all of which were recorded in fiscal year 2007.
On July 15, 2008, the Company initiated a plan to reorganize the structure of its operating units
and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or
approximately 5% of its
34
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
25. Restructuring Expenses
workforce. As a result of this plan,
the Company incurred $4.0 million in pre-tax restructuring
expenses in Q3 2008 for one-time termination benefits. The plan was
substantially completed in Q3 2008 and the majority
of cash expenditures occurred in Q3 2008.
The following table summarizes restructuring activity, which is included in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses for YTD 2008 and YTD 2007.
Severance Pay | Relocation | |||||||||||
In Thousands | and Benefits | and Other | Total | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Provision |
1,607 | 988 | 2,595 | |||||||||
Cash payments |
1,607 | 988 | 2,595 | |||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Balance at December 30, 2007 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Provision |
3,998 | 48 | 4,046 | |||||||||
Cash payments |
3,130 | 48 | 3,178 | |||||||||
Balance at September 28, 2008 |
$ | 868 | $ | | $ | 868 | ||||||
35
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(M,D&A) should be read in conjunction with Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidateds (the Company)
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements. M,D&A includes the following sections:
| Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry a general description of the
Companys business and the nonalcoholic beverage industry. |
||
| Areas of Emphasis a summary of
the Companys key priorities. |
||
| Overview of Operations and Financial Condition a summary of key information and trends
concerning the financial results for the third quarter of 2008 (Q3 2008) and the first
nine months of 2008 (YTD 2008) and changes from the third quarter of 2007 (Q3 2007) and
the first nine months of 2007 (YTD 2007). |
||
| Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
a discussion of accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of the
Companys financial condition and results of operations and that require critical judgments
and estimates and the expected impact of new accounting
pronouncements. |
||
| Results of Operations an analysis of the Companys results of operations for Q3 2008
and YTD 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2007. |
||
| Financial Condition an analysis of the Companys financial condition as of the end of
Q3 2008 compared to year-end 2007 and the end of Q3 2007 as presented in the consolidated
financial statements. |
||
| Liquidity and Capital Resources an analysis of capital resources, cash sources and
uses, investing activities, financing activities, off-balance sheet arrangements, aggregate
contractual obligations and hedging activities. |
||
| Cautionary Information Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements. |
The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the Company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries including Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (Piedmont).
Minority interest consists of The Coca-Cola Companys interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7% for all
periods presented.
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry
The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The
Coca-Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and popular beverage brands in the
world. The Company is the second largest bottler of products of The Coca-Cola Company in the
United States, distributing these products in eleven states primarily in the Southeast. The Company also distributes
several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both sparkling and still beverages.
Sparkling beverages are primarily carbonated beverages including energy products. Still beverages
are primarily noncarbonated beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready to drink coffee, enhanced
water, juices and sports drinks. The Company had net sales of approximately $1.4 billion in 2007.
The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Companys competitors include bottlers
and distributors of nationally and regionally advertised and marketed products and private label
products. In each region in which the Company operates, between 75% and 95% of sparkling beverage
sales in bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its principal
competitors, which in each region includes
36
the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions, the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown
and/or 7-Up products. During the last several years, industry sales of sugar sparkling beverages,
other than energy products, have declined. The decline in sugar sparkling beverages has generally
been offset by volume growth in other nonalcoholic product categories. The sparkling beverage
category (including energy products) represents 80% of the Companys YTD 2008 bottle/can net sales.
The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are point-of-sale
merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and dispensing equipment, packaging changes,
pricing, price promotions, product quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of
distribution and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in its territories with
respect to each of these methods.
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and first nine months of the fiscal year have
not been representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results
primarily from higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third quarters versus
the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are
not significantly impacted by business seasonality.
The
Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and
goodwill as of the first day of the fourth quarter. During Q3 2008,
the Company believes it did not experience any events or changes in
circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of the Companys franchise rights or
goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company did not perform
an interim impairment test during Q3 2008 and did not record any
impairments of franchise rights or goodwill.
Net sales by product category were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Bottle/can sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
$ | 258,200 | $ | 255,804 | $ | 762,741 | $ | 760,359 | ||||||||
Still beverages |
66,160 | 58,897 | 186,020 | 158,280 | ||||||||||||
Total bottle/can sales |
324,360 | 314,701 | 948,761 | 918,639 | ||||||||||||
Other sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
31,231 | 27,804 | 94,356 | 101,774 | ||||||||||||
Post-mix and other |
25,972 | 24,855 | 72,123 | 74,946 | ||||||||||||
Total other sales |
57,203 | 52,659 | 166,479 | 176,720 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 381,563 | $ | 367,360 | $ | 1,115,240 | $ | 1,095,359 | ||||||||
Areas of Emphasis
Key priorities for the Company include revenue management, product innovation and beverage
portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity.
Revenue Management
Revenue management requires a strategy which reflects consideration for pricing of brands and
packages within product categories and channels, highly effective working relationships with
customers and disciplined fact-based
decision-making. Revenue management has been and continues to be a key performance driver which
has significant impact on the Companys results of operations.
37
Product Innovation and Beverage Portfolio Expansion
Sparkling beverages volume, other than energy products, has declined over the past several years.
Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and will continue to be critical to the
Companys overall revenue. The Company introduced the following new products during 2007:
smartwater, vitaminwater, vitaminenergy, Gold Peak and Country Breeze tea products, Diet Coke Plus,
Dasani Plus, juice products from FUZE (a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company) and V8 juice products
from Campbells. The Company also modified its energy product portfolio in 2007 with the addition
of NOS© products from FUZE.
In August 2007, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Energy Brands Inc. (Energy
Brands), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company. Energy Brands, also known as
glacéau, is a producer and distributor of branded enhanced beverages including vitaminwater,
smartwater and vitaminenergy. The distribution agreement was effective November 1, 2007 for a
period of ten years and, unless earlier terminated, will be automatically renewed for succeeding
ten-year terms, subject to a one year non-renewal notification by the Company. In conjunction with
the execution of the distribution agreement, the Company entered into an agreement with The
Coca-Cola Company whereby the Company agreed not to introduce new third party brands or certain
third party brand extensions in the United States through August 31, 2010 unless mutually agreed to
by the Company and The Coca-Cola Company.
The Company has invested in its own brand portfolio with products such as Respect, a vitamin and
mineral enhanced beverage, Tum-E Yummies, a vitamin C enhanced flavored drink, Country Breeze and
diet Country Breeze tea and its own energy drink. The Company is also the exclusive licensee of
Cinnabon Premium Coffee Lattes in North America. These brands enable the Company to participate in
strong growth categories and capitalize on distribution channels that may include the Companys
traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory as well as third party distributors outside the Companys
traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory. While the growth prospects of Company-owned or
exclusive licensed brands appear promising, the cost of developing, marketing and distributing
these brands is anticipated to be significant.
The
Company entered into a distribution agreement in October 2008 with subsidiaries of Hansen
Natural Corporation, the developer, marketer, seller and distributor of Monster Energy
drinks, the leading volume brand in the U.S. energy drink category. Under this agreement, the
Company has the right to distribute Monster Energy drinks in certain of the Companys territories
beginning in November 2008.
38
Distribution Cost Management
Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from Company locations to
customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to $152.5 million and $144.1 million in YTD
2008 and YTD 2007, respectively. Over the past several years, the Company has focused on converting
its distribution system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This conversion
to a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently handle increasing numbers of
products. In addition, the Company has closed a number of smaller sales distribution centers over
the past several years reducing its fixed warehouse-related costs.
The Company has three primary delivery systems for its current business:
| bulk delivery for large supermarkets,
mass merchandisers and club stores; |
||
| advanced sales delivery for convenience stores, drug stores, small supermarkets and
certain on-premise accounts; and |
||
| full service delivery for its full
service vending customers. |
Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the Company.
Productivity
A key driver in the Companys selling, delivery and administrative (S,D&A) expense management
relates to ongoing improvements in labor productivity and asset productivity. The Company
initiated plans to reorganize the structure in its operating units and support services in July
2008. The reorganization resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or
approximately 5%, of the Companys workforce. The Company implemented these changes in order to
improve its efficiency and to help offset significant increases in the cost of raw materials and
operating expenses. The Company anticipates annual savings of $25 million to $30 million from this
reorganization plan. The plan was substantially completed in Q3 2008. The Company continues to focus on
its supply chain and distribution functions for ongoing opportunities to improve productivity.
39
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition
The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the Companys financial
results for Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2007.
The following items affect the comparability of the financial results presented below:
Q3
2008 and YTD 2008
| a $13.8 million ($7.2 million after-tax, or basic net loss per share of $.78)
charge to freeze the Companys liability to the Central States, Southeast and
Southwest Areas Pension Fund (Central States), a multi-employer pension fund, while preserving the
pension benefits previously earned by Company employees covered by this plan; and |
||
| a $4.0 million ($2.1 million after-tax, or basic net loss per share of $.23)
charge for restructuring expense related to the Companys plan initiated in Q3
2008 to reorganize the structure of its operating units and support services,
which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions. |
YTD 2007
| a $2.6 million ($1.6 million after-tax, or basic net loss per share of $.18)
charge related to a simplification of the Companys operating management structure
and reduction in workforce. |
Third Quarter | % | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | Change | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 381,563 | $ | 367,360 | $ | 14,203 | 3.9 | |||||||||
Gross margin |
155,827 | 155,212 | 615 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
S,D&A expenses |
149,384 | 134,972 | 14,412 | 10.7 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
6,443 | 20,240 | (13,797 | ) | (68.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
9,406 | 12,135 | (2,729 | ) | (22.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(3,668 | ) | 7,995 | (11,663 | ) | NM | * | |||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
(523 | ) | 2,722 | (3,245 | ) | NM | * | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(3,145 | ) | 5,273 | (8,418 | ) | NM | * | |||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | (.92 | ) | NM | * | ||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | (.92 | ) | NM | * | ||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | (.92 | ) | NM | * | ||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | (.34 | ) | $ | .58 | $ | (.92 | ) | NM | * |
* Not meaningful
First Nine Months | % | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2008 | 2007 | Change | Change | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,115,240 | $ | 1,095,359 | $ | 19,881 | 1.8 | |||||||||
Gross margin |
467,625 | 475,993 | (8,368 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||||
S,D&A expenses |
421,300 | 402,710 | 18,590 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
46,325 | 73,283 | (26,958 | ) | (36.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
29,789 | 36,647 | (6,858 | ) | (18.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
14,810 | 34,676 | (19,866 | ) | (57.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax provision |
7,135 | 13,061 | (5,926 | ) | (45.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
7,675 | 21,615 | (13,940 | ) | (64.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Basic net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 0.84 | $ | 2.37 | $ | (1.53 | ) | (64.6 | ) | |||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 0.84 | $ | 2.37 | $ | (1.53 | ) | (64.6 | ) | |||||||
Diluted net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 0.84 | $ | 2.36 | $ | (1.52 | ) | (64.4 | ) | |||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 0.83 | $ | 2.36 | $ | (1.53 | ) | (64.8 | ) |
The Companys net sales grew 3.9% and 1.8% in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008, respectively, from the same
periods in 2007. The net sales increase in Q3 2008 was primarily due to a 5.3% increase in
bottle/can sales price per unit and a 9.5% increase in sales price per unit of other Coca-Cola
bottlers sales (bottler sales) offset by a 10% decrease
in post-mix volume. These increases were recognized primarily to help
offset increases in product costs. Bottle/can volume
decreased by 1.5% in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007. The increases in sales price per unit were
primarily due to a per unit price increase in all product categories except energy products and
bottled water and increased sales of enhanced water which have a higher per unit price
offset by decreases in higher price packages in higher margin channels. The net sales increase in
YTD 2008 was
40
primarily due to a 2.6% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit and a .6% increase
in bottle/can volume offset by a 7.3%, or $7.4 million, decrease in bottler sales. The increase in
bottle/can sales price per unit was primarily due to an increase in per unit price of sparkling
products (other than energy products) and increases in sales of enhanced water which has a higher
per unit sales price, offset by decreases in sales of higher price packages in higher margin
channels (primarily convenience) and lower sales price per unit for bottled water. The increase
in bottle/can volume was primarily due to increases in enhanced water volume offset by a decrease
in bottled water volume. The decreases in bottler sales were primarily the result of decreased
volume in energy and tea products.
Gross margin dollars increased .4% in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and decreased 1.8% in YTD 2008
compared to YTD 2007. The Companys gross margin percentage decreased from 42.3% for Q3 2007 to
40.8% for Q3 2008 and from 43.5% in YTD 2007 to 41.9% in YTD 2008. The decrease in gross margin as
a percentage of net sales in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007 was primarily due to increased raw
material costs and increased sales of purchased products (which have lower margin percentages)
partially offset by higher sales prices per unit. The decrease in gross margin as a percentage of
net sales in YTD 2008 compared to YTD 2007 was primarily due to increased raw material costs,
increased sales of purchased products (which have lower margin percentages), a shift in product and
package mix to lower margin items and lower sales price per unit for bottled water partially offset
by higher sales prices per unit for other products. Purchased products include FUZE, Campbells products, smartwater,
vitaminwater and NOS© energy products.
S,D&A expenses increased 10.7% in Q3 2008 from Q3 2007 and increased 4.6% in YTD 2008 from YTD
2007. The increases in S,D&A expenses in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 were primarily attributable to the $13.8 million
charge that resulted from the new collective bargaining agreement
that allowed the Company to freeze
its liability for the union pension plan, restructuring expenses and increased fuel costs.
Net interest expense decreased 22.5% and 18.7% in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and YTD
2007, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to lower effective interest rates and lower
borrowing levels offset by a $.9 million and $2.3 million decrease in interest earned on short-term
cash investments in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 as compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2007, respectively. The
Companys overall weighted average interest rate decreased to 5.7% during YTD 2008 from 6.7% during
YTD 2007.
Net debt and capital lease obligations were summarized as follows:
Sept. 28, | December 30, | Sept. 30, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||
Debt |
$ | 591,450 | $ | 598,850 | $ | 691,450 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations |
78,280 | 80,215 | 80,839 | |||||||||
Total debt and capital lease obligations |
669,730 | 679,065 | 772,289 | |||||||||
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
20,583 | 9,871 | 88,400 | |||||||||
Total net debt and capital lease obligations (1) |
$ | 649,147 | $ | 669,194 | $ | 683,889 | ||||||
(1) | The non-GAAP measure Total net debt and capital lease obligations is used to
provide readers with additional information to more clearly evaluate the Companys capital
structure and financial leverage. |
41
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under
different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 30, 2007 a discussion of the Companys most critical accounting policies,
which are those most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results of
operations and require managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
The
Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during YTD 2008. Any changes
in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is made.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, which was effective for the year ending December 31, 2006 except for the
requirement that benefit plan assets and obligations be measured as of the date of the employers
statement of financial position, which was effective for the year ending December 28, 2008. The
impact of the adoption of the change in measurement dates was not material to the consolidated
financial statements. See Note 16 and Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement. This Statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement does not
require any new fair value measurements but could change the current practices in measuring
current fair value measurements. The Statement was effective at the beginning of the first
quarter of 2008 (Q1 2008) for all financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of this
Statement did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information. In February 2008, FASB issued
FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which defers the
application date of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities
until the first quarter of 2009 except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company is in the process of evaluating the
impact related to the Companys nonfinancial assets and liabilities not valued on a recurring
basis.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. This Statement was effective at the beginning
of Q1 2008. The Company has not applied the fair value option to any of its outstanding
instruments; therefore, the Statement did not have an impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
42
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No.
51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary
(commonly referred to as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The
Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company
anticipates that the adoption of this Statement will not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements, although changes in financial statement
presentation will be required.
In December 2007, FASB revised SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). This
Statement established principles and requirements for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets
and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at
their fair values as of the acquisition date. The Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The impact on the Company of adopting SFAS No. 141(R)
will depend on the nature, terms and size of business combinations completed after the effective
date.
In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). This Statement amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of
why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for and how they affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The Statement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after
November 15, 2008. The adoption of this Statement will not impact the consolidated financial
statements other than expanded footnote disclosures related to derivative instruments and related
hedged items.
In April 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors to be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of intangible assets under SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP 142-3 is to improve the
consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows
used to measure its fair value. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 142-3, but does not expect
it to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This Statement
is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commissions approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
The Company does not expect the Statement to have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
43
In September 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures About
Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45, and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161 (FSP
133-1). FSP 133-1 amends Statement 133 to require a seller of credit derivatives to provide
certain disclosures for each credit derivative (or group of similar credit derivatives). FSP 133-1
also amends Interpretation 45 to require guarantors to disclose the current status of
payment/performance risk of guarantees and clarifies the effective date of SFAS No. 161. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP 133-1, but does not expect it to have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Q3 2008 Compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2008 Compared to YTD 2007
Net Sales
Net sales increased $14.2 million, or 3.9%, to $381.6 million in Q3 2008 compared to $367.4 million
in Q3 2007. Net sales increased $19.9 million, or 1.8%, to $1,115.2 million in YTD 2008 compared
to $1,095.4 million in YTD 2007.
The increase in net sales was a result of the following:
Q3 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | 11.0 | 5.3%
increase in bottle/can sales price per unit (in response to increases
in product costs) primarily
due to per unit price increases in all product categories
except bottled water and energy and increased sales of enhanced
water which has a higher per unit price offset by decreases
in higher price packages in higher margin channels |
|||
2.7 | 9.5% increase in bottler sales price per unit primarily due to a per unit price
increase in all product categories except tea and increased sales of enhanced water
which has a higher per unit price |
||||
(2.1 | ) | 10%
decrease in post-mix volume |
|||
(1.4 | ) | 1.5% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to decreases in sugar sparkling
beverages and bottled water volumes offset by an increase in enhanced
water volume |
|||
4.0 | Other |
||||
$ | 14.2 | Total increase in net sales |
|||
44
YTD 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | 15.1 | 2.6%
increase in bottle/can sales price per unit (in response to increases
in product costs) primarily
due to increased sales of enhanced water which has a higher
per unit price and higher per unit prices of sparkling
products, other than energy products, offset by decreases in
sales of higher price packages in higher margin channels
(primarily convenience) and a lower sales price per unit for
bottled water |
|||
15.0 | .6% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to an increase in enhanced water volume
offset by a decrease in bottled water volume |
||||
(5.9 | ) | 9.7%
decrease in post-mix volume |
|||
(3.9 | ) | 3.8% decrease in bottler sales volume primarily due to decreases in energy and tea
products volume |
|||
(3.5 | ) | 3.6% decrease in bottler sales price per unit primarily due to a decrease in
energy drink volume as a percentage of total volume (energy drinks have a higher sales
price per unit) |
|||
3.1 | Other |
||||
$ | 19.9 | Total increase in net sales |
|||
In YTD 2008, the Companys bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for 85.0% of the
Companys total net sales. Bottle/can net pricing is based on the invoice price charged to
customers reduced by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is impacted by the
price charged per package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in which those
packages are sold. The increase in the Companys bottle/can net pricing per unit in Q3 2008
compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2008 compared to YTD 2007 was primarily due to sales price increases in
all product categories, except water and energy, and increases in sales of enhanced water which has
a higher sales price per unit, partially offset by decreases in sales
of higher price packages (primarily in the
convenience store channel) and a lower sales price per unit for bottled water.
Product category sales volume in Q3 2008 and Q3 2007 and YTD 2008 and YTD 2007 as a percentage of
total bottle/can sales volume and the percentage change by product category was as follows:
Bottle/Can Sales Volume | Bottle/Can Sales Volume | ||||||||||||
Product Category | Q3 2008 | Q3 2007 | % Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including
energy products) |
82.7 | % | 83.2 | % | (2.1 | ) | |||||||
Still beverages |
17.3 | % | 16.8 | % | 1.5 | ||||||||
Total bottle/can sales volume |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | (1.5 | ) | |||||||
Bottle/Can Sales Volume | Bottle/Can Sales Volume | ||||||||||||
Product Category | YTD 2008 | YTD 2007 | % Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including
energy products) |
83.5 | % | 84.5 | % | (0.5 | ) | |||||||
Still beverages |
16.5 | % | 15.5 | % | 6.6 | ||||||||
Total bottle/can sales volume |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 0.6 | ||||||||
The Companys products are sold and distributed through various channels. These channels include
selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts
and vending machine outlets. During YTD 2008, approximately 68% of the Companys bottle/can volume
was sold for future consumption. The remaining bottle/can volume of approximately 32% was sold for
immediate consumption.
The Companys
45
largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for approximately 19% of the
Companys total bottle/can volume during YTD 2008. The Companys second largest customer, Food
Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 12% of the Companys total bottle/can volume in YTD 2008.
All of the Companys beverage sales are to customers in the United States.
The Company charges certain customers a delivery fee to offset a portion of the Companys delivery
and handling costs. The delivery fee is recorded in net sales and was $4.7 million and $5.1
million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing
overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs and shipping and handling
costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution
centers.
Cost of sales increased 6.4%, or $13.6 million, to $225.7 million in Q3 2008 compared to $212.1
million in Q3 2007. Cost of sales increased $28.2 million, or 4.6%, to $647.6 million in YTD
2008 compared to $619.4 million in YTD 2007.
The increase in cost of sales was principally attributable to the following:
Q3 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | 10.4 | Increase in costs primarily due to an increase in purchased products and an increase in raw
material costs such as high fructose corn syrup and plastic
bottles |
|||
2.5 | Increase
in manufacturing costs primarily due to an increase in fuel
costs |
||||
0.7 | Other |
||||
$ | 13.6 | Total increase in cost of sales |
|||
YTD 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | 32.4 | Increase in costs primarily due to an increase in purchased products and an increase in raw
material costs such as high fructose corn syrup and plastic
bottles |
|||
12.2 | .6% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to increases in enhanced water volume
offset by a decrease in bottled water volume |
||||
(6.4 | ) | Increase
in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola
Company |
|||
(4.0 | ) | 9.7% decrease in post-mix volume |
|||
(3.0 | ) | Decrease
in bottler sales cost per unit primarily due to a decrease in energy drink
volume as a percentage of total volume (energy drinks have a higher
cost per unit) |
|||
(3.7 | ) | 3.8% decrease in bottler sales volume primarily due to decreases in energy and tea
products volume |
|||
3.3 | Increase
in manufacturing costs primarily due to increased fuel
costs |
||||
(2.6 | ) | Increase
in equity investment in plastic bottle cooperative |
|||
$ | 28.2 | Total increase in cost of sales |
|||
The Company recorded an adjustment to its equity investment in a plastic bottle cooperative in the
second quarter of 2008 which resulted in a pre-tax credit of $2.6 million. This
adjustment was made based on information received from the cooperative during the quarter and
reflected a higher share of the
cooperatives retained earnings compared to the amount previously recorded by the Company. The
Company classifies its equity in earnings of the cooperative in cost of sales consistent with the
classification of purchases from the cooperative.
46
The Company relies extensively on advertising and sales promotion in the marketing of its products.
The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies that supply concentrates, syrups and finished
products to the Company make substantial marketing and advertising expenditures to promote sales in
the local territories served by the Company. The Company also benefits from national advertising
programs conducted by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies. Certain of the marketing
expenditures by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies are made pursuant to
annual arrangements. Although The Coca-Cola Company has advised the Company that it intends to
continue to provide marketing funding support, it is not obligated to do so under the Companys
Bottle Contracts. Significant decreases in marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company or
other beverage companies could adversely impact operating results of the Company in the future.
Total marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, which
includes direct payments to the Company and payments to customers for marketing programs, was $41.9
million for YTD 2008 compared to $35.5 million for YTD 2007 and was recorded as a reduction in cost
of sales.
Gross Margin
Gross margin dollars increased $.6 million, or .4%, to $155.8 million in Q3 2008 from $155.2
million in Q3 2007. Gross margin dollars decreased $8.4 million, or 1.8% to $467.6 million in YTD
2008 compared to $476.0 million in YTD 2007.
The increase (decrease) in gross margin dollars was primarily the result of the following:
Q3 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | 11.0 | 5.3% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit
(in response to increases in product costs) primarily
due to per unit price increases in all product categories
except bottled water and energy and increased sales of enhanced
water which has a higher per unit price offset by decreases
in higher price packages in higher margin channels |
|||
(10.4 | ) | Increase in costs primarily due to an increase in purchased products and an increase in raw
material costs such as high fructose corn syrup and plastic
bottles |
|||
2.7 | 9.5% increase in bottler sales price per unit primarily due to per unit price
increases in all product categories except tea and increased sales of enhanced water which
has a higher per unit price |
||||
(2.5 | ) | Increase
in manufacturing costs primarily due to increased fuel
costs |
|||
(0.2 | ) | Other |
|||
$ | 0.6 | Total increase in gross margin |
|||
47
YTD 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | (32.4 | ) | Increase in costs primarily due to an increase in purchased products and an increase in raw material costs such
as high fructose corn syrup and plastic bottles |
||
15.1 | 2.6% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit
(in response to increases in product costs) primarily due to increased sales of
enhanced water which has a higher per unit price and higher per unit prices of sparkling
products, other than energy products, offset by decreases in sales of higher price packages in higher
margin channels (primarily convenience) and lower sales price per
unit for bottled water |
||||
6.4 | Increase
in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola
Company |
||||
(3.5 | ) | 3.6% decrease in bottler sales price per unit primarily due to a decrease in
energy drink volume as a percentage of total volume (energy drinks have a higher sales price
per unit) |
|||
(3.3 | ) | Increase
in manufacturing costs primarily due to increased fuel
costs |
|||
3.0 | Decrease
in bottler sales cost per unit primarily due to a decrease in energy drink
volume as a percentage of total volume (energy drinks have a higher
sales price per unit) |
||||
2.8 | .6% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to increases in enhanced water volume
offset by a decrease in bottled water volume |
||||
2.6 | Increase
in equity investment in plastic bottle cooperative |
||||
0.9 | Other |
||||
$ | (8.4 | ) | Total decrease in gross margin |
||
The Companys gross margin percentage decreased from 42.3% for Q3 2007 to 40.8% for Q3 2008 and
from 43.5% in YTD 2007 to 41.9% in YTD 2008. The decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net
sales in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007 was primarily due to increased raw material costs and
increased purchased products (which have lower margin percentages) partially offset by higher sales
prices per unit. The decrease in gross margin as a percentage of net sales in YTD 2008 compared to
YTD 2007 was primarily due to increased raw material costs, increased
purchased products, a lower
percentage of sales of higher margin packages and a lower sales price per unit for bottled water,
partially offset by higher sales prices per unit for other products, increased marketing funding
and the increase in the equity investment in a plastic bottle cooperative.
The Companys gross margins may not be comparable to other companies, since some entities include
all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales. The Company includes a portion
of these costs in S,D&A expenses.
S,D&A Expenses
S,D&A expenses include the following: sales management labor costs, distribution costs from sales
distribution centers to customer locations, sales distribution center warehouse costs,
depreciation expense related to sales centers, delivery vehicles and cold drink equipment,
point-of-sale expenses, advertising expenses, cold drink equipment repair costs, amortization of
intangibles and administrative support labor and operating costs such as treasury, legal,
information services, accounting, internal control services, human resources and executive
management costs.
S,D&A expenses increased by $14.4 million, or 10.7%, to $149.4 million in Q3 2008 from $135.0
million in Q3 2007. S,D&A expenses increased by $18.6 million, or 4.6%, to $421.3 million in YTD
2008 from $402.7 million in YTD 2007.
48
The increase in S,D&A expenses was primarily due to the following:
Q3 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | 13.8 | Charge
to exit from multi-employer pension plan |
|||
3.9 | Increase
in restructuring costs |
||||
2.2 | Increase in fuel and other energy costs related to the movement of finished goods from
sales distribution centers to customer locations |
||||
(1.8 | ) | Decrease in marketing costs |
|||
1.4 | Increase
in property and casualty insurance |
||||
1.1 | Increase
in estimated bonus expense based on projected 2008 financial
performance |
||||
(1.0 | ) | Decrease in employee benefit costs primarily due to lower pension plan costs, offset
by increases in the Companys 401(k) Savings Plan
contributions |
|||
(5.2 | ) | Other |
|||
$ | 14.4 | Total increase in S,D&A expenses |
|||
YTD 2008 | Attributable to: | ||||
(In Millions) | |||||
$ | 13.8 | Charge
to exit from multi-employer pension plan |
|||
5.7 | Increase in fuel and other energy costs related to the movement of finished goods from
sales distribution centers to customer locations |
||||
(2.4 | ) | Decrease in employee benefit costs primarily due to lower pension plan costs, offset
by increases in the Companys 401(k) Savings Plan
contributions |
|||
2.3 | Increase
in property and casualty insurance costs |
||||
(1.6 | ) | Decrease
in estimated bonus expense based on projected 2008 financial
performance |
|||
1.6 | Gain
on sales of aviation equipment in YTD 2007 |
||||
(1.5 | ) | Decrease in estimated compensation expense related to restricted stock award based on
projected 2008 financial performance |
|||
1.5 | Increase
in restructuring costs |
||||
(0.8 | ) | Other |
|||
$ | 18.6 | Total increase in S,D&A expenses |
|||
Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations
to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related
to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are
included in S,D&A expenses and totaled $152.5 million and $144.1 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007,
respectively.
The net impact of the fuel hedges was to increase fuel costs by $0.6 million and $0.1 million in Q3
2008 and Q3 2007, respectively. The net impact of the fuel hedges was to decrease fuel costs by
$1.2 million and $0.7 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively.
On February 2, 2007, the Company initiated plans to simplify its operating management structure and
reduce its workforce in order to improve operating efficiencies across the Companys business. The
restructuring expenses consisted primarily of one-time termination benefits and other associated
costs, primarily relocation expenses for certain employees. During Q3 2007 and YTD 2007, the
Company incurred $.2 million and $2.6 million in
restructuring expenses, respectively. Total restructuring expenses
under these plans were $2.8
million, all of which were recorded in fiscal year 2007.
49
On July 15, 2008, the Company initiated a plan to reorganize the structure of its operating units
and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or
approximately 5% of its workforce. As a result of this plan, the Company
incurred $4.0 million in restructuring expenses in Q3 2008 for
one-time termination benefits. The plan was completed in Q3 2008
and the majority of cash expenditures occurred in Q3 2008.
The Company entered into a new agreement with a collective bargaining unit in Q3 2008. The
collective bargaining unit represents approximately 270 employees, or approximately 4% of the
Companys total workforce. The new agreement allows the Company
to freeze its liability to the
Central States, a multi-employer pension fund, while
preserving the pension benefits previously earned by the employees. As a result of the new
agreement, the Company recorded a charge of $13.8 million in Q3 2008. The Company will pay $3.0
million in the fourth quarter of 2008 to the Southern States Savings
and Retirement Plan (Southern States) under this agreement. The remaining $10.8 million is the
present value amount, using a discount rate of 7%, that will be paid under the agreement and has
been recorded in other liabilities. The Company will pay approximately $1 million annually over
the next 20 years to Central States. In addition, the Company will make future contributions on behalf of these
employees to the Southern States, a multi-employer defined contribution
plan.
Based on
the performance of the Companys pension plan investments during
2008, the Company currently anticipates that expense related to the
two Company-sponsored pension plans will increase significantly in
2009.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense decreased 22.5%, or $2.7 million, in Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and decreased
18.7%, or $6.9 million, in YTD 2008 compared to YTD 2007. The decrease in interest expense was
primarily due to lower effective interest rates and lower levels of borrowing offset by a $.9
million and $2.3 million decrease in interest earned on short-term cash investments in Q3 2008 and
YTD 2008 as compared to Q3 2007 and YTD 2007, respectively. The Companys overall weighted average
interest rate decreased to 5.7% during YTD 2008 from 6.7% during YTD 2007. See the Liquidity and
Capital Resources Hedging Activities Interest Rate Hedging section of M,D&A for additional
information.
Minority Interest
The Company recorded minority interest of $1.7 million in YTD 2008 compared to $2.0 million in YTD
2007 related to the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola Company. The decreased amount in
YTD 2008 was due to lower operating results at Piedmont.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for YTD 2008 was 48.2% compared to 37.7% for YTD 2007. The
higher effective tax rate for YTD 2008 resulted primarily from an increase in the Companys reserve
for uncertain tax positions. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information. The Companys income tax rate for the remainder of 2008 is dependent upon results of
operations and may change if the results for 2008 are different from current expectations.
The adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN
48), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes and FASB Staff
Position FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FSP FIN 48-1)
effective January 1, 2007, did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 15 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information related to the implementation of FIN 48 and FSP FIN
48-1.
50
The Companys income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based
on the Companys ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that
becomes available to the Company.
Financial Condition
Total assets increased to $1.32 billion at September 28, 2008 from $1.29 billion at December 30,
2007 primarily due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable partially
offset by a decrease in property, plant and equipment.
Net working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, decreased by $152.9
million to a negative $113.8 million at September 28, 2008 from December 30, 2007 and decreased by
$155.6 million at September 28, 2008 from September 30, 2007.
Significant changes in net working capital from December 30, 2007 were as follows:
| An increase in current portion of long-term debt of $169.3 million primarily due to the
reclassification from long-term to current of $176.7 million of debentures which mature in May
2009 and July 2009. |
|
| An increase in cash and cash equivalents of $10.7 million primarily due to cash flow from
operations. |
|
| An increase in accounts receivable, trade of $13.1 million primarily due to higher sales in
the quarter ended September 2008 compared to the quarter ended
December 2007. |
|
| An increase in accounts receivable from and an increase in accounts payable to The
Coca-Cola Company of $8.9 million and $26.7 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing
of payments. |
|
| A decrease in accounts payable, trade of $14.3 million primarily due to the timing of
payments. |
|
| An increase in other accrued liabilities of $7.1 million primarily due to higher income tax
payable. |
|
| A decrease in accrued compensation of $5.9 million due primarily to the payment of bonuses
in March 2008 and a lower accrual for 2008 bonuses. |
|
| An increase in accrued interest payable of $6.6 million primarily due to the timing of
interest payments. |
Significant changes in net working capital from September 30, 2007 were as follows:
| An increase in the current portion of long-term debt of $76.7 million primarily due to the
reclassification from long-term to current of $176.7 million of debentures which mature in May
2009 and July 2009, partially offset by the payment of $100 million in debentures in November
2007. |
|
| A decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $67.8 million primarily due to the payment of
$100 million of debentures in November 2007. |
|
| An increase in accounts receivable, trade of $8.7 million primarily due to higher sales in
Q3 2008 compared to Q3 2007 and the collection of payments from customers on the last day of
September 2008 which was in the fourth quarter of 2008, while the last day of September 2007
was in the third quarter of 2007. |
|
| A decrease in accounts receivable and an increase in accounts payable to The Coca-Cola
Company of $7.1 million and $16.5 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing of
payments. |
|
| An increase in other accrued liabilities of $7.7 million primarily due to higher insurance
accruals. |
51
Debt and capital lease obligations were $669.7 million as of September 28, 2008 compared to $679.1
million as of December 30, 2007 and $772.3 million as of September 30, 2007. Debt and capital
lease obligations as of September 28, 2008 included $78.3 million of capital lease obligations
related primarily to Company facilities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Resources
The Companys sources of capital include cash flows from operations, available credit facilities
and the issuance of debt and equity securities. Management believes the Company has sufficient
resources available to finance its business plan, meet its working capital requirements and
maintain an appropriate level of capital spending. The amount and frequency of future dividends
will be determined by the Companys Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial
condition of the Company at such time, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be
declared in the future.
As of September 28, 2008, the Company had $200 million available under its $200 million revolving
credit facility (the $200 million facility) to meet its
cash requirements. The $200 million facility contains two
financial covenants: a fixed charge coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as
defined in the credit agreement. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants.
The
Company has debt maturities of $119.3 million in May 2009 and $57.4
million in July 2009. The Company anticipates using cash flow
generated from operations, its $200 million facility and
potentially other sources, including bank borrowings or issuance of
debentures or equity securities, to repay or refinance these debt
maturities. The Company currently has, and anticipates it will
continue to have, capacity under its $200 million facility and cash
on hand to repay or refinance these debt maturities in the event
other financing sources are not available. The Company currently
believes that all the of the banks participating in the
Companys $200 million facility have the ability to and will
meet any funding requests from the Company.
The Company has obtained the majority of its long-term financing, other than capital leases, from
public markets. As of September 28, 2008, $591.5 million of the Companys total outstanding balance
of debt and capital lease obligations of $669.7 million was financed through publicly offered debt.
The Company had capital lease obligations of $78.3 million as of September 28, 2008. There were
no amounts outstanding on the $200 million facility as of September 28, 2008. The
Companys interest rate derivative contracts were with several different financial institutions to
minimize the concentration of credit risk. The Company had master agreements with the
counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provided for net settlement of
derivative transactions.
Cash Sources and Uses
The primary sources of cash for the Company have been cash provided by operating activities and
financing activities. The primary uses of cash have been for capital expenditures, the payment of
debt and capital lease obligations, dividend payments and income tax payments.
52
A summary of activity for YTD 2008 and YTD 2007 follows:
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Millions | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Cash Sources |
||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities (excluding income tax payments) |
$ | 66.6 | $ | 77.8 | ||||
Proceeds from the termination of interest rate swap agreements |
5.1 | | ||||||
Proceeds
from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
1.2 | 7.7 | ||||||
Total cash sources |
$ | 72.9 | $ | 85.5 | ||||
Cash Uses |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 41.2 | $ | 30.6 | ||||
Investment in plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative |
1.0 | 2.3 | ||||||
Payment of lines of credit, net |
7.4 | | ||||||
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations |
1.9 | 1.8 | ||||||
Dividends |
6.9 | 6.8 | ||||||
Income tax payments |
3.7 | 17.0 | ||||||
Other |
.1 | .4 | ||||||
Total cash uses |
$ | 62.2 | $ | 58.9 | ||||
Increase in cash |
$ | 10.7 | $ | 26.6 | ||||
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment during YTD 2008 were $41.2 million compared to $30.6
million during YTD 2007. Capital expenditures during YTD 2008 were funded with cash flows from
operations and borrowings from the Companys revolving credit facility. The Company anticipates
total additions to property, plant and equipment in fiscal year 2008 will be in the range of $45 million to $55
million. Leasing is used for certain capital additions when considered cost effective relative to
other sources of capital. The Company currently leases its corporate headquarters, two production
facilities and several sales distribution facilities and administrative facilities.
Financing Activities
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into a $200 million facility,
replacing its $100 million facility. The $200 million facility matures in
March 2012 and includes an option to extend the term for an additional year at the discretion of
the participating banks. The $200 million facility bears
interest at a floating base rate or a floating rate of
LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of .35%, dependent on the length
of the term of the borrowing. In addition, the Company must pay an annual facility
fee of .10% of the lenders aggregate commitments under the facility. Both the interest rate
spread and the facility fee are determined from a commonly-used pricing grid based on the
Companys long-term senior unsecured debt rating. The $200 million facility contains two
financial covenants: a fixed charge coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each
as defined in the credit agreement. On August 25, 2008, the Company entered into an
amendment to the $200 million facility. The amendment clarified that charges incurred by the
Company resulting from the Companys withdrawal from the Central States, would be excluded from the calculations of the
financial covenants to the extent they are recognized
before March 29, 2009 and do not exceed $15 million. See
Note 18 of the consolidated financial
statements for additional details on the withdrawal. The Company is currently in compliance with these
covenants. There were no amounts outstanding under the
$200 million facility at September 28,
2008, December 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007.
53
The Company had borrowed periodically under uncommitted lines of credit. These uncommitted lines
of credit were made available at the discretion of participating banks at rates negotiated at the
time of borrowing. The lines of credit have been terminated by the participating banks. There were no amounts outstanding under uncommitted lines of
credit on September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007. On December 30, 2007, $7.4 million was
outstanding under uncommitted lines of credit.
All of the outstanding debt has been issued by the Company with none having been issued by any of
the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt. The Company or its
subsidiaries have entered into four capital leases.
At September 28, 2008, the Companys credit ratings were as follows:
Long-Term Debt | ||
Standard & Poors |
BBB | |
Moodys |
Baa2 |
The Companys credit ratings are reviewed periodically by the respective rating agencies. Changes
in the Companys operating results or financial position could result in changes in the Companys
credit ratings. Lower credit ratings could result in higher borrowing costs and/or different
credit terms for the Company. There were no changes in these credit ratings from the prior year.
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as indebtedness by the Companys subsidiaries in excess of
certain amounts.
54
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is a member of two manufacturing cooperatives and has guaranteed $42.1 million of debt
and related lease obligations for these entities as of September 28, 2008. In addition, the
Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities. As of September 28, 2008, the Companys
maximum exposure, if the entities borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, would have been $65.5
million including the Companys equity interests. See Note 14 of the consolidated financial
statements for additional information about these entities.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments as
of September 28, 2008:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Oct. 2008- | Oct. 2009- | Oct. 2011- | After | |||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Total | Sept. 2009 | Sept. 2011 | Sept. 2013 | Sept. 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt, net of interest |
$ | 591,450 | $ | 176,693 | $ | | $ | 150,000 | $ | 264,757 | ||||||||||
Capital lease obligations,
net of interest |
78,280 | 2,735 | 6,050 | 6,924 | 62,571 | |||||||||||||||
Estimated interest on
long-term debt and capital
lease obligations (1) |
261,743 | 35,161 | 55,554 | 48,621 | 122,407 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (2) |
506,487 | 89,380 | 178,760 | 178,760 | 59,587 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities (3) |
111,444 | 7,380 | 14,155 | 13,528 | 76,381 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
17,043 | 3,519 | 4,428 | 2,381 | 6,715 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term contractual
arrangements (4) |
25,737 | 6,400 | 10,558 | 7,040 | 1,739 | |||||||||||||||
Postretirement obligations |
36,058 | 1,966 | 4,869 | 5,212 | 24,011 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase orders (5) |
33,358 | 33,358 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 1,661,600 | $ | 356,592 | $ | 274,374 | $ | 412,466 | $ | 618,168 | ||||||||||
(1) | Includes interest payments based on contractual terms and current interest rates for variable
rate debt. |
|
(2) | Represents an estimate of the Companys obligation to purchase 17.5 million cases of
finished product on an annual basis through May 2014 from South Atlantic Canners, a
manufacturing cooperative. |
|
(3) | Includes obligations under executive benefit plans, unrecognized income tax benefits, the
liability to exit from a multi-employer pension plan and other
long-term liabilities. |
55
(4) | Includes contractual arrangements with certain prestige properties, athletics venues and
other locations, and other long-term marketing commitments. |
|
(5) | Purchase orders include commitments in which a written purchase order has been issued to a
vendor, but the goods have not been received or the services have not
been performed. |
The Company has $10.4 million of unrecognized income tax benefits including accrued interest as of
September 28, 2008 (included in other long-term liabilities in the table above) of which $9.3
million would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. It is expected that the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next 12 months. During this period, it is
reasonably possible that tax audits could reduce unrecognized tax benefits. The Company cannot
reasonably estimate the change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits until further
information is made available during the progress of the audits. See Note 15 of the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
The Company is a member of Southeastern Container, a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative,
from which the Company is obligated to purchase at least 80% of its requirements of plastic
bottles for certain designated territories. This obligation is not included in the Companys
table of contractual obligations and commercial commitments since there are no minimum purchase
requirements.
As of September 28, 2008, the Company has $19.3 million of standby letters of credit, primarily
related to its property and casualty insurance programs. See Note 14 of the consolidated
financial statements for additional information related to commercial commitments, guarantees,
legal and tax matters.
The Company contributed $0.2 million to one of its Company-sponsored pension plans in YTD 2008.
The Company does not expect to contribute to either of its two Company-sponsored pension plans
during the remainder of 2008. The Company anticipates that it will be
required to make contributions to its two Company-sponsored pension
plans in 2009. Based on information currently available, the Company
estimates cash contributions in 2009 will be in the range of $5
million to $15 million.
Postretirement medical care payments are expected to be
approximately $2.3 million in 2008. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information related to pension and postretirement obligations.
Hedging Activities
Interest Rate Hedging
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to mitigate risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
In September 2008, the Company terminated six interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount
of $225 million it had outstanding. The Company received
$6.2 million in cash proceeds including $1.1 million for
previously accrued interest receivable. After accounting for the
previously accrued interest receivable, the Company will amortize a
gain of $5.1 million over the remaining term of the underlying
debt.
Interest expense was reduced due to the amortization of deferred gains on previously terminated
interest rate swap agreements and forward interest rate agreements by $1.3 million during both YTD
2008 and YTD 2007.
The weighted average interest rate of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations after taking
into account all of the interest rate hedging activities was 5.9% as of September 28, 2008 compared
to 6.2% as of December 30, 2007 and 6.7% as of September 30, 2007. Approximately 6% of the
Companys debt and capital lease obligations of $669.7 million as of September 28, 2008 was
maintained on a floating rate basis and was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
56
Assuming no changes in the Companys capital structure, if market interest rates average 1% more
over the next twelve months than the interest rates as of September 28, 2008, interest expense for
the next twelve months would increase by approximately $0.4 million. This amount is determined by
calculating the effect of a hypothetical interest rate increase of 1% on outstanding floating rate
debt and capital lease obligations as of September 28, 2008. This calculated, hypothetical
increase in interest expense for the following twelve months may be different from the actual
increase in interest expense from a 1% increase in interest rates due to varying interest rate
reset dates on the Companys floating rate debt.
Fuel Hedging
The Company uses derivative instruments to hedge the majority of the Companys vehicle fuel
purchases. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel and unleaded gasoline used in the
Companys delivery fleet. Derivative instruments used include puts, calls and caps which
effectively establish a limit on the Companys price of fuel within periods covered by the
instruments. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the
corresponding period of the instrument. The Company accounts for its fuel hedges on a
mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an
adjustment of fuel costs. The fuel hedging agreements expired at the
end of Q3 2008.
The net impact of the fuel hedges was to increase fuel costs by $0.6 million and $0.1 million in Q3
2008 and Q3 2007, respectively. The net impact of the fuel hedges was to decrease fuel costs by
$1.2 million and $0.7 million in YTD 2008 and YTD 2007, respectively.
In October 2008, the Company entered into derivative contracts to hedge the majority of its diesel
fuel purchases for 2009. The Company used calls and puts to establish an upper and lower limit on
the Companys price of diesel fuel.
57
Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as information included in future filings by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material,
press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain,
forward-looking management comments and other statements that reflect managements current outlook
for future periods. These statements include, among others, statements relating to:
| the Companys belief that other parties to certain contractual arrangements will perform
their obligations; |
||
| potential marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage
companies; |
||
| the Companys belief that disposition of certain claims and legal proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, cash flows or results of
operations and that no material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is reasonably
possible; |
||
| managements belief that the Company has adequately provided for any ultimate amounts
that are likely to result from tax audits; |
||
| managements belief that the Company has sufficient resources available to finance its
business plan, meet its working capital requirements and maintain an appropriate level of
capital spending; |
||
| the Companys belief that the cooperatives whose debt and lease obligations the Company
guarantees have sufficient assets and the ability to adjust selling prices of their
products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss and that the cooperatives will
perform their obligations under their debt and lease agreements; |
||
| the Companys key priorities which are revenue management, product innovation and
beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and
productivity; |
||
| the Companys hypothetical calculation of the impact of a 1% increase in interest rates
on outstanding floating rate debt and capital lease obligations for the next twelve months
as of September 28, 2008; |
||
| the Companys expectation that it will not make additional contributions to either of
its Company-sponsored pension plans during the remainder of
2008; |
||
| the Companys anticipation that
pension expense related to the two Company-sponsored pension plans
will increase significantly in 2009; |
||
| the Companys belief that cash
contributions in 2009 to its two Company-sponsored pension plans will be in
the range of $5 million to $15 million; |
||
| the Companys belief that postretirement benefit payments are expected to be
approximately $2.3 million in 2008; |
||
| the Companys expectation that additions to property, plant and equipment in 2008 will
be in the range of $45 million to $55 million; |
||
| the Companys beliefs and estimates regarding the impact of the adoption of certain new
accounting pronouncements; |
||
| the Companys belief that innovation of new brands and packages will continue to be
critical to the Companys overall revenue; |
||
| the Companys beliefs that the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed
brands appear promising and the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands
may be significant; |
||
| the Companys expectation that unrecognized tax benefits may be reduced over the next 12
months as a result of tax audits; |
58
| the Companys expectation that it will use cash flow generated from operations, its
revolving credit facility and potentially other sources, including bank borrowings or
issuance of debentures or equity securities, to repay or refinance debentures maturing in
May 2009 and July 2009; |
||
| the Companys belief that all of the
banks participating in the Companys $200 million facility have
the ability to and will meet any funding requests from the Company; |
||
| the Companys current estimate that it will not achieve at least 80% of the overall goal
achievement factor under its Annual Bonus Plan for 2008; |
||
| the Companys belief that the reorganization of its operating units and support services and its
workforce reduction plan was substantially completed by
the end of the third quarter of 2008, that the majority of cash
expenditures were
incurred in the third quarter of 2008 and the annual savings will be $25 million to $30
million from the plan; |
||
| the Companys belief that it is competitive in its territories with respect to the
principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage
industry; and |
||
| the Companys estimate that a 10% increase in the market price of certain commodities
over the current market prices would cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months
by approximately $25 million assuming flat volume. |
These statements and expectations are based on currently available competitive, financial and
economic data along with the Companys operating plans, and are subject to future events and
uncertainties that could cause anticipated events not to occur or actual results to differ
materially from historical or anticipated results. Factors that could impact those differences or
adversely affect future periods include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in Part II,
Item 1A. of this Form 10-Q and in Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 30, 2007.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on the Companys forward-looking statements,
which reflect the expectations of management of the Company only as of the time such statements are
made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
59
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company is exposed to certain market risks that arise in the ordinary course of business. The
Company may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market
risk. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading
purposes. A discussion of the Companys primary market risk exposure and interest rate risk is
presented below.
Debt and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its fixed and floating rate debt. The Company
periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate fluctuations.
The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon anticipated cash flows
from operations relative to the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity analyses are
performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of various interest
rate movements. The counterparties to these interest rate hedging arrangements were major
financial institutions with which the Company also has other financial relationships. The Company
did not have any interest rate hedging products as of September 28, 2008. The Company generally
maintains between 40% and 60% of total borrowings at variable interest rates after taking into
account all of the interest rate hedging activities. While this is the target range for the
percentage of total borrowings at variable interest rates, the financial position of the Company
and market conditions may result in strategies outside of this range at certain points in time.
Approximately 6% of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations of $669.7 million as of
September 28, 2008 was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
As it relates to the Companys variable rate debt and variable rate leases, assuming no changes in
the Companys financial structure, if market interest rates average 1% more over the next twelve
months than the interest rates as of September 28, 2008, interest expense for the following 12
months would increase by approximately $0.4 million. This amount was determined by calculating the
effect of the hypothetical interest rate on our variable rate debt and variable rate leases after
giving consideration to all our interest rate hedging activities. This calculated, hypothetical
increase in interest expense for the following twelve months may be different from the actual
increase in interest expense from a 1% increase in interest rates due to varying interest rate
reset dates on the Companys floating rate debt and derivative financial instruments.
Raw Material and Commodity Price Risk
The Company is also subject to commodity price risk arising from price movements for certain other
commodities included as part of its raw materials. The Company manages this commodity price risk
in some cases by entering into contracts with adjustable prices. The Company has not historically
used derivative commodity instruments in the management of this risk. The Company estimates that a
10% increase in the market prices of these commodities over the current market prices would
cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months by
approximately $25 million assuming flat
volume.
The Company uses derivative instruments to hedge the majority of the Companys vehicle fuel
purchases. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel and unleaded gasoline used in the
Companys delivery fleet. Instruments used include puts, calls and caps which effectively
establish a limit on the Companys price of fuel within periods covered by the instruments. The
Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the corresponding period of the
instrument. The Company currently accounts for its fuel hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any
expense or income being reflected as an adjustment of fuel costs.
60
Effects of Changing Prices
The principal effect of inflation on the Companys operating results is to increase costs. The
Company may raise selling prices to offset these cost increases; however, the resulting impact on
retail prices may reduce the volume of product purchased by consumers.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of
providing reasonable assurance the information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company
files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to
the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 28, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
61
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Except for the factor set forth below, there have been no material changes to the factors
disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 30, 2007.
The Companys ability to access the credit markets.
Recently, the capital and credit markets have become increasingly volatile as a result of
adverse conditions that have caused the failure and near failure of a number of large
financial services companies. If the capital and credit markets continue to experience
volatility and availability of funds remains limited, it is possible that the Companys
ability to access the credit markets may be limited by these factors at a time when the
Company would like, or need to do so. These limitations could have an impact on the Companys
ability to refinance maturing debt and/or react to changing economic and business conditions.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description |
|
4.1
|
The registrant, by signing this report, agrees to furnish the Securities and
Exchange Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument which defines the
rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and its consolidated
subsidiaries which authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10 percent
of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. |
|
10.1
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 25, 2008, to U.S. $200,000,000 Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2007, by and among the Company, the
banks named therein and Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent (filed
herewith). |
|
12
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (filed herewith). | |
31.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
31.2
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
32
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
62
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED (REGISTRANT) |
||||
Date: November 7, 2008 | By: | /s/ James E. Harris | ||
James E. Harris | ||||
Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
||||
Date: November 7, 2008 | By: | /s/ William J. Billiard | ||
William J. Billiard | ||||
Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant and Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
||||
63