Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended September 27, 2009
Commission
File Number 0-9286
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 56-0950585 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(704) 557-4400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at October 30, 2009 | |
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value | 7,141,447 | |
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value | 2,021,882 |
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2009
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2009
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 374,556 | $ | 381,563 | $ | 1,088,566 | $ | 1,115,240 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
217,236 | 225,736 | 623,990 | 647,615 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
157,320 | 155,827 | 464,576 | 467,625 | ||||||||||||
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses |
131,024 | 149,384 | 386,461 | 421,300 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
26,296 | 6,443 | 78,115 | 46,325 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
8,866 | 9,406 | 28,059 | 29,789 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
17,430 | (2,963 | ) | 50,056 | 16,536 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1,043 | (523 | ) | 11,928 | 7,135 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
16,387 | (2,440 | ) | 38,128 | 9,401 | |||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
959 | 705 | 1,982 | 1,726 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated |
$ | 15,428 | $ | (3,145 | ) | $ | 36,146 | $ | 7,675 | |||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share based on
net income attributable to Coca-Cola
Bottling Co. Consolidated: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.94 | $ | .84 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding |
7,141 | 6,644 | 7,047 | 6,644 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.94 | $ | .84 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding |
2,022 | 2,500 | 2,117 | 2,500 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share based on
net income attributable to Coca-Cola
Bottling Co. Consolidated: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.93 | $ | .84 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Common Stock
shares outstanding assuming dilution |
9,203 | 9,144 | 9,194 | 9,159 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 1.67 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.92 | $ | .83 | |||||||
Weighted average number of Class B Common
Stock shares outstanding assuming dilution |
2,062 | 2,500 | 2,147 | 2,515 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | .25 | $ | .25 | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | .25 | $ | .25 | $ | .75 | $ | .75 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
Unaudited | Unaudited | |||||||||||
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 25,062 | $ | 45,407 | $ | 20,583 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
4,512 | | | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, trade, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,971, $1,188 and $1,043, respectively |
96,263 | 99,849 | 105,580 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
17,460 | 3,454 | 12,661 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, other |
17,015 | 12,990 | 11,539 | |||||||||
Inventories |
67,762 | 65,497 | 65,595 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
25,398 | 21,121 | 19,334 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
253,472 | 248,318 | 235,292 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
319,456 | 338,156 | 351,575 | |||||||||
Leased property under capital leases, net |
52,727 | 66,730 | 67,763 | |||||||||
Other assets |
46,001 | 33,937 | 36,365 | |||||||||
Franchise rights, net |
520,672 | 520,672 | 520,672 | |||||||||
Goodwill, net |
102,049 | 102,049 | 102,049 | |||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
5,489 | 5,910 | 3,973 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,299,866 | $ | 1,315,772 | $ | 1,317,689 | ||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Share Data)
Unaudited | Unaudited | |||||||||||
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Current portion of debt |
$ | | $ | 176,693 | $ | 176,693 | ||||||
Current portion of obligations under capital leases |
3,759 | 2,781 | 2,735 | |||||||||
Accounts payable, trade |
32,597 | 42,383 | 37,071 | |||||||||
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
43,601 | 35,311 | 38,346 | |||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
64,208 | 57,504 | 61,654 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation |
23,195 | 23,285 | 17,563 | |||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
12,487 | 8,139 | 15,060 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
179,847 | 346,096 | 349,122 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
142,239 | 139,338 | 163,403 | |||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
99,066 | 107,005 | 34,560 | |||||||||
Other liabilities |
103,788 | 107,037 | 109,720 | |||||||||
Obligations under capital leases |
60,247 | 74,833 | 75,545 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
552,882 | 414,757 | 414,757 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,138,069 | 1,189,066 | 1,147,107 | |||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) |
||||||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||||||
Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
||||||||||||
Authorized 30,000,000 shares; |
||||||||||||
Issued 10,203,821, 9,706,051 and 9,706,051 shares,
respectively |
10,204 | 9,706 | 9,706 | |||||||||
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value: |
||||||||||||
Authorized 10,000,000 shares; |
||||||||||||
Issued 2,649,996, 3,127,766 and 3,127,766 shares,
respectively |
2,649 | 3,127 | 3,127 | |||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
103,562 | 103,582 | 102,449 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
108,295 | 79,021 | 79,891 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(54,038 | ) | (57,873 | ) | (13,068 | ) | ||||||
170,672 | 137,563 | 182,105 | ||||||||||
Less-Treasury stock, at cost: |
||||||||||||
Common 3,062,374 shares |
60,845 | 60,845 | 60,845 | |||||||||
Class B Common 628,114 shares |
409 | 409 | 409 | |||||||||
Total equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated |
109,418 | 76,309 | 120,851 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
52,379 | 50,397 | 49,731 | |||||||||
Total equity |
161,797 | 126,706 | 170,582 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,299,866 | $ | 1,315,772 | $ | 1,317,689 | ||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
Capital | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B | in | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Common | Excess of | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | Equity | Noncontrolling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Par Value | Earnings | Loss | Stock | of CCBCC | Interest | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance on
Dec. 30, 2007 |
$ | 9,706 | $ | 3,107 | $ | 102,469 | $ | 79,227 | $ | (12,751 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 120,504 | $ | 48,005 | $ | 168,509 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
7,675 | 7,675 | 1,726 | 9,401 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments, net of tax |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments,
net of tax |
(200 | ) | (200 | ) | (200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive
income |
7,472 | 1,726 | 9,198 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to change
measurement date for
pension and postretirement
remeaurement adjustment,
net of tax |
(153 | ) | (114 | ) | (267 | ) | (267 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid Common ($.75 per share) |
(4,983 | ) | (4,983 | ) | (4,983 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B Common ($.75 per share) |
(1,875 | ) | (1,875 | ) | (1,875 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 20,000
shares of Class B
Common Stock |
20 | (20 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance on
Sept. 28, 2008 |
$ | 9,706 | $ | 3,127 | $ | 102,449 | $ | 79,891 | $ | (13,068 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 120,851 | $ | 49,731 | $ | 170,582 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance on
Dec. 28, 2008 |
$ | 9,706 | $ | 3,127 | $ | 103,582 | $ | 79,021 | $ | (57,873 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 76,309 | $ | 50,397 | $ | 126,706 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
36,146 | 36,146 | 1,982 | 38,128 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments, net of tax |
1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement
benefit adjustments,
net of tax |
3,834 | 3,834 | 3,834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive
income |
39,981 | 1,982 | 41,963 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid Common ($.75 per share) |
(5,232 | ) | (5,232 | ) | (5,232 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class B Common ($.75 per share) |
(1,640 | ) | (1,640 | ) | (1,640 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of 20,000
shares of Class B
Common Stock |
20 | (20 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of Class B
Common Stock into
Common Stock |
498 | (498 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance on
Sept. 27, 2009 |
$ | 10,204 | $ | 2,649 | $ | 103,562 | $ | 108,295 | $ | (54,038 | ) | $ | (61,254 | ) | $ | 109,418 | $ | 52,379 | $ | 161,797 | ||||||||||||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
In Thousands
First Nine Months | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 38,128 | $ | 9,401 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation expense |
45,526 | 50,386 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
421 | 329 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
6,470 | 1,044 | ||||||
Losses on sale of property, plant and equipment |
767 | 1,117 | ||||||
Amortization of debt costs |
1,811 | 1,834 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred gain related to terminated
interest rate agreements |
(1,770 | ) | (1,311 | ) | ||||
Provision for liabilities to exit from multi-employer pension plan |
| 13,812 | ||||||
Stock compensation expense |
1,464 | | ||||||
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
(7,605 | ) | (2,828 | ) | ||||
Increase in other noncurrent assets |
(12,606 | ) | (1,341 | ) | ||||
Decrease in other noncurrent liabilities |
(14,271 | ) | (9,423 | ) | ||||
Other |
1 | (170 | ) | |||||
Total adjustments |
20,208 | 53,449 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
58,336 | 62,850 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
||||||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
(29,776 | ) | (41,175 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
4,942 | 1,126 | ||||||
Investment in a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative |
| (968 | ) | |||||
Investment in restricted cash |
(4,512 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(29,346 | ) | (41,017 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, net |
108,062 | | ||||||
Borrowing under revolving credit facility |
30,000 | | ||||||
Payment of current portion of long-term debt |
(176,693 | ) | | |||||
Payment of lines of credit |
| (7,400 | ) | |||||
Cash dividends paid |
(6,872 | ) | (6,858 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
(2,364 | ) | (1,935 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the termination of interest rate swap agreements |
| 5,142 | ||||||
Payments for the termination of interest rate lock agreements |
(340 | ) | | |||||
Debt issuance costs paid |
(1,042 | ) | | |||||
Other |
(86 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(49,335 | ) | (11,121 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
(20,345 | ) | 10,712 | |||||
Cash at beginning of period |
45,407 | 9,871 | ||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 25,062 | $ | 20,583 | ||||
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of Class B Common Stock in connection with stock award |
$ | 1,130 | $ | 1,171 | ||||
Capital lease obligations incurred |
660 | |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
and its majority owned subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management,
are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. All such
adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and
footnotes required by GAAP. The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are consistent
with those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 28, 2008 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance on
accounting for the noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements. The Company
implemented the new guidance effective December 29, 2008, the beginning of the first quarter of
2009. The new guidance changes the accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary (commonly referred to previously as minority interest). Piedmont
Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (Piedmont) is the Companys only subsidiary that has a
noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest income of $1.0 million in the third quarter of
2009 (Q3 2009), $2.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 (YTD 2009), $.7 million in the
third quarter of 2008 (Q3 2008) and $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2008 (YTD 2008)
have been reclassified to be included in net income on the Companys consolidated statements of
operations. In addition, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to both the Company
and the noncontrolling interest are shown on the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
Noncontrolling interest related to Piedmont totaled $52.4 million, $50.4 million and $49.7 million
at September 27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008, respectively. These amounts have
been reclassified as noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the Companys consolidated
balance sheets.
Management evaluated all activity of the Company through November 6, 2009 (the issue date of the
Companys consolidated financial statements) and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred
that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
During the second quarter of 2009, the Companys provider of property and casualty insurance
requested the Company increase the face amount of the letters of credit the Company is required to
provide for the property and casualty insurance programs. Simultaneously with the required
increase in the letters of credit, the Company was required to maintain $4.5 million in a separate
bank account as collateral for these letters of credit which was recorded as restricted cash.
2. Seasonality of Business
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and first nine months of the fiscal year have
not been representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results
primarily from higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third quarters versus
the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are
not significantly impacted by business seasonality.
3. Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership
On July 2, 1993, the Company and The Coca-Cola Company formed Piedmont to distribute and market
nonalcoholic beverages primarily in portions of North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company
provides a portion of the nonalcoholic beverage products to Piedmont at cost and receives
a fee for managing the operations of Piedmont pursuant to a management agreement. These
intercompany transactions are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Noncontrolling interest as of September 27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008
represents the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Companys
interest in Piedmont was 22.7% for all periods presented.
4. Inventories
Inventories were summarized as follows:
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | |||||||||
Finished products |
$ | 40,576 | $ | 36,418 | $ | 40,250 | ||||||
Manufacturing materials |
7,968 | 12,620 | 7,261 | |||||||||
Plastic shells, plastic pallets and other inventories |
19,218 | 16,459 | 18,084 | |||||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 67,762 | $ | 65,497 | $ | 65,595 | ||||||
9
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
The principal categories and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as
follows:
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | Estimated | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
Land |
$ | 12,167 | $ | 12,167 | $ | 12,212 | ||||||||||
Buildings |
110,059 | 109,384 | 110,708 | 10-50 years | ||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
124,410 | 118,934 | 118,154 | 5-20 years | ||||||||||||
Transportation equipment |
165,867 | 176,084 | 179,787 | 4-17 years | ||||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
37,363 | 38,254 | 38,877 | 4-10 years | ||||||||||||
Cold drink dispensing equipment |
309,727 | 319,188 | 327,054 | 6-15 years | ||||||||||||
Leasehold and land improvements |
61,937 | 60,142 | 60,979 | 5-20 years | ||||||||||||
Software for internal use |
65,022 | 59,786 | 58,611 | 3-10 years | ||||||||||||
Construction in progress |
2,426 | 4,891 | 4,082 | |||||||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment, at cost |
888,978 | 898,830 | 910,464 | |||||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
and amortization |
569,522 | 560,674 | 558,889 | |||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 319,456 | $ | 338,156 | $ | 351,575 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense was $15.1 million and $16.7 million in Q3 2009 and Q3 2008, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $45.5 million and $50.4 million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008,
respectively. These amounts included amortization expense for leased property under capital
leases.
The Company changed the useful lives of certain cold drink dispensing equipment from thirteen to
fifteen years in the first quarter of 2009 (Q1 2009) to better reflect actual useful lives. The
change in useful lives reduced depreciation expense in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009 by $.9 million and $2.9
million, respectively.
6. Leased Property Under Capital Leases
Leased property under capital leases was summarized as follows:
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | Estimated | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
Leased property under capital leases |
$ | 76,877 | $ | 88,619 | $ | 88,619 | 3-20 years | |||||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization |
24,150 | 21,889 | 20,856 | |||||||||||||
Leased property under capital leases, net |
$ | 52,727 | $ | 66,730 | $ | 67,763 | ||||||||||
As of September 27, 2009, real estate represented $52.1 million of the leased property under
capital leases and $50.5 million of this real estate is leased from related parties as described
in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company modified a related party lease and terminated a second lease in Q1 2009. See Note 19
to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the lease modification.
10
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
7. Franchise Rights and Goodwill
There was no change in the carrying amounts of franchise rights and goodwill in the periods
presented. The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of
the first day of the fourth quarter. During YTD 2009, the Company believes it has not experienced
any events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amounts of the Companys
franchise rights or goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company has not performed an
interim impairment test during YTD 2009 and has not recognized any impairments of franchise rights
or goodwill.
8. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
Other identifiable intangible assets were summarized as follows:
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | Estimated | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets |
$ | 8,665 | $ | 8,909 | $ | 6,599 | 1-20 years | |||||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization |
3,176 | 2,999 | 2,626 | |||||||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
$ | 5,489 | $ | 5,910 | $ | 3,973 | ||||||||||
Other identifiable intangible assets primarily represent customer relationships and
distribution rights.
9. Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities were summarized as follows:
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | |||||||||
Accrued marketing costs |
$ | 9,987 | $ | 9,001 | $ | 9,121 | ||||||
Accrued insurance costs |
17,940 | 17,132 | 16,558 | |||||||||
Accrued taxes (other than income taxes) |
2,480 | 374 | 2,517 | |||||||||
Accrued income taxes |
3,000 | | 3,840 | |||||||||
Employee benefit plan accruals |
12,126 | 8,626 | 11,010 | |||||||||
Checks and transfers yet to be presented for payment from
zero balance cash account |
11,950 | 11,074 | 10,235 | |||||||||
All other accrued liabilities |
6,725 | 11,297 | 8,373 | |||||||||
Total other accrued liabilities |
$ | 64,208 | $ | 57,504 | $ | 61,654 | ||||||
11
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
10. Debt
Debt was summarized as follows:
Interest | Interest | Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Maturity | Rate | Paid | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility |
2012 | .66 | % | Varies | $ | 30,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Debentures |
2009 | 7.20 | % | Semi-annually | | 57,440 | 57,440 | |||||||||||||||||
Debentures |
2009 | 6.375 | % | Semi-annually | | 119,253 | 119,253 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes |
2012 | 5.00 | % | Semi-annually | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes |
2015 | 5.30 | % | Semi-annually | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes |
2016 | 5.00 | % | Semi-annually | 164,757 | 164,757 | 164,757 | |||||||||||||||||
Senior Notes |
2019 | 7.00 | % | Semi-annually | 110,000 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Unamortized discount
on Senior Notes |
2019 | (1,875 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||
552,882 | 591,450 | 591,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Current portion of debt |
| 176,693 | 176,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 552,882 | $ | 414,757 | $ | 414,757 | ||||||||||||||||||
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into a $200 million revolving credit facility ($200 million
facility), replacing its $100 million facility. The $200 million facility matures in March 2012
and includes an option to extend the term for an additional year at the discretion of the
participating banks. The $200 million facility bears interest at a floating base rate or a
floating rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of .35%, dependent on the length of the term
of the borrowing. In addition, the Company must pay an annual facility fee of .10% of the
lenders aggregate commitments under the facility. Both the interest rate spread and the facility
fee are determined from a commonly-used pricing grid based on the Companys long-term senior
unsecured debt rating. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a fixed
charges coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as defined in the credit
agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a consolidated cash
flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The operating cash flow ratio requires the
Company to maintain a debt to operating cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or lower. On August 25, 2008,
the Company entered into an amendment to the $200 million facility. The amendment clarified that
charges incurred by the Company resulting from the Companys withdrawal from the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas
Pension Fund (Central States) would be excluded from the calculations of the financial covenants
to the extent they were incurred on or before March 31, 2009 and did not exceed $15 million. See
Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details on the withdrawal from
Central States. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants as amended by the
amendment to the $200 million facility and has been throughout 2009. These covenants do not
currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will,
12
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
10. Debt
restrict its liquidity or capital resources. On September 27, 2009, the Company had $30.0
million outstanding under the $200 million facility. On December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008,
the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the $200 million facility.
On July 1, 2009 the Company borrowed $55.0 million under the $200 million facility and used the
proceeds, along with $2.4 million of cash on hand, to repay at maturity the Companys $57.4
million outstanding 7.20% Debentures due 2009. As of September 27, 2009, the Company has repaid
$25.0 million of the $55.0 million borrowed on July 1, 2009 under the $200 million facility.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due 2019. The
proceeds plus cash on hand were used on May 1, 2009 to repay at maturity the $119.3 million
outstanding 6.375% Debentures due 2009.
After taking into account all of its interest rate hedging activities, the Company had a weighted
average interest rate of 5.5%, 5.9% and 5.9% for its debt and capital lease obligations as of
September 27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008, respectively. The Companys overall
weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 5.7% for both YTD 2009
and YTD 2008. As of September 27, 2009, approximately 9.6% of the Companys debt and capital lease
obligations of $616.9 million was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as the incurrence of indebtedness by the Companys
subsidiaries in excess of certain amounts.
All of the outstanding long-term debt has been issued by the Company with none being issued by any
of the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt.
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
On September 18, 2008, the Company terminated six outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of $225 million receiving $6.2 million in cash proceeds including $1.1
million for previously accrued
13
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
interest receivable. After accounting for previously accrued interest receivable, the Company is
amortizing the gain of $5.1 million over the remaining term of the underlying debt. During YTD
2009, $1.0 million of the gain has been amortized. The remaining amount to be amortized is $3.7
million. All of the Companys interest rate swap agreements were LIBOR-based.
The Company had no interest rate swap agreements at September 27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and
September 28, 2008.
The Company uses several different financial institutions for interest rate derivative agreements
and commodity derivative instruments, described below, to minimize the concentration of credit
risk. While the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these
counterparties, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by these parties. The Company has
master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provided for
net settlement of the derivative transactions.
Commodities
The Company is subject to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in commodity prices. In
the normal course of business, the Company manages these risks through a variety of strategies,
including the use of derivative instruments. The Company does not use derivative instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either
assets or liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheets. These derivative instruments
are not designated as hedging instruments under generally accepted accounting principles and are
used as economic hedges to manage certain commodity risk. Currently the Company has derivative
instruments to hedge its projected diesel fuel and aluminum purchase requirements. These
derivative instruments are marked to market on a periodic basis and recognized in earnings
consistent with the expense classification of the underlying hedged item. Settlements of
derivative agreements are included in cash flows from operating activities on the Companys
consolidated statements of cash flows.
The Company is using derivative instruments to hedge all of its projected diesel fuel purchases
for 2009 and 2010. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the Companys
delivery fleet. At the end of Q1 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments to hedge
approximately 75% of the Companys projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. During the
second quarter of 2009, the Company entered into derivative agreements to hedge approximately 75%
of the Companys projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements.
The following summarizes Q3 2009 net gains and Q3 2008 net losses on the Companys fuel and
aluminum derivative financial instruments and the classification of such net gain/loss in the
consolidated statements of operations:
Third Quarter | ||||||||||||
In Thousands | Classification of Gain (Loss) | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Fuel Hedges |
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses | $ | (635 | ) | $ | (583 | ) | |||||
Aluminum Hedges |
Cost of sales | 1,440 | | |||||||||
Total Net Gain (Loss) |
$ | 805 | $ | (583 | ) | |||||||
14
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following summarizes YTD 2009 and YTD 2008 net gains on the Companys fuel and aluminum
derivative financial instruments and the classification of such net gains in the consolidated
statements of operations:
First Nine Months | ||||||||||
In Thousands | Classification of Gain | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Fuel Hedges |
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses | $ | 1,974 | $ | 1,206 | |||||
Aluminum Hedges |
Cost of sales | 5,326 | | |||||||
Total Net Gains |
$ | 7,300 | $ | 1,206 | ||||||
The following summarizes the fair values and classification in the consolidated balance sheets of
derivative instruments held by the Company as of September 27, 2009:
Classification of | Sept. 27, | |||||
In Thousands | Derivative Instruments | 2009 | ||||
Assets |
||||||
Fuel hedges at fair market value |
Prepaid and other assets | $ | 584 | |||
Aluminum hedges at fair market value |
Prepaid and other assets | 968 | ||||
Unamortized cost of fuel hedging agreements |
Prepaid and other assets | 859 | ||||
Unamortized cost of aluminum hedging agreements |
Prepaid and other assets | 716 | ||||
Fuel hedges at fair market value |
Other assets | 353 | ||||
Aluminum hedges at fair market value |
Other assets | 4,358 | ||||
Unamortized cost of fuel hedging agreements |
Other assets | 246 | ||||
Unamortized cost of aluminum hedging agreements |
Other assets | 2,935 |
The following table summarizes the Companys outstanding derivative agreements as of September 27,
2009:
Notional | Latest | |||||
In Thousands | Amount | Maturity | ||||
Fuel hedging agreements
|
$ | 16,831 | December 2010 | |||
Aluminum hedging agreements
|
53,253 | December 2011 |
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of
its financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts
payable approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these items.
Public Debt Securities
The fair values of the Companys public debt securities are based on estimated current market
prices.
15
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Non-Public Variable Rate Debt
The carrying amounts of the Companys variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values.
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets/Liabilities
The fair values of deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities, which are held in mutual
funds, are based upon the quoted market value of the securities held within the mutual funds.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair values for the Companys interest rate swap, fuel hedging and aluminum hedging agreements
are based on current settlement values. Credit risk related to the derivative financial
instruments is managed by requiring high standards for its counterparties and periodic
settlements. The Company considers nonperformance risk in determining the fair values of
derivative financial instruments.
Letters of Credit
The fair values of the Companys letters of credit obtained from financial institutions are based
on the notional amounts of the instruments. These letters of credit primarily relate to the
Companys property and casualty insurance programs.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys debt, deferred compensation plan, derivative
financial instruments and letters of credit were as follows:
Sept. 27, 2009 | Dec. 28, 2008 | Sept. 28, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Amount | Value | Amount | Value | Amount | Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Public debt securities |
$ | 522,882 | $ | 559,627 | $ | 591,450 | $ | 559,963 | $ | 591,450 | $ | 550,420 | ||||||||||||
Non-public variable rate debt |
30,000 | 30,000 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan
assets/liabilities |
7,996 | 7,996 | 5,446 | 5,446 | 6,444 | 6,444 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fuel hedging agreements |
(937 | ) | (937 | ) | 1,985 | 1,985 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Aluminum hedging agreements |
(5,326 | ) | (5,326 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
| 25,645 | | 19,274 | | 19,332 |
The fair value of the fuel hedging agreements at September 27, 2009 represented the estimated
amount the Company would have received upon termination of these agreements. The fair value of the
fuel hedging agreements at December 28, 2008 represented the estimated amount the Company would
have paid upon termination of these agreements. At September 28, 2008, the Company did not have
any fuel hedging agreements outstanding.
The fair value of the aluminum hedging agreements at September 27, 2009 represented the estimated
amount the Company would have received upon termination of these agreements.
16
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
In September 2006, FASB issued new guidance on fair value measurements. The Company adopted the
new guidance on fair value measurements as of December 31, 2007, the beginning of the first quarter
of 2008, and there was no material impact to the consolidated financial statements. In the first
quarter of 2008, FASB issued additional guidance that delayed the effective date of the fair value
measurements new guidance for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities until Q1 2009 except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis. There was no material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the new guidance
for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in Q1 2009, but such adoption could have a material effect
in the future. The new guidance requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in GAAP and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The new guidance is
intended to enable the readers of financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those
measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information
used to determine fair values. The new guidance requires that assets and liabilities carried at
fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market
data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
The following table summarizes, by assets and liabilities, the valuation of the Companys deferred
compensation plan, aluminum hedging agreements and fuel hedging agreements for the categories
above:
Sept. 27, 2009 | Dec. 28, 2008 | Sept. 28, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 1 | Level 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan assets |
$ | 7,996 | $ | 5,446 | $ | 6,444 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Aluminum hedging agreements |
$ | 5,326 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuel hedging agreements |
937 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan liabilities |
7,996 | 5,446 | 6,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuel hedging agreements |
$ | 1,985 |
The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other
highly compensated employees. The investment assets are held in mutual funds. The fair value of
the mutual funds is based on the quoted market value of the securities held within the funds (Level
1). The related deferred compensation liability represents the fair value of the investment
assets.
The Companys fuel hedging agreements are based upon NYMEX rates that are observable and quoted
periodically over the full term of the agreements and are considered Level 2 items.
The Companys aluminum hedging agreements are based upon LME rates that are observable and quoted
periodically over the full term of the agreements and are considered Level 2 items.
17
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
12. Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The Company does not have Level 3 assets or liabilities.
13. Other Liabilities
Other liabilities were summarized as follows:
Sept. 27, | Dec. 28, | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | |||||||||
Accruals for executive benefit plans |
$ | 83,825 | $ | 77,299 | $ | 77,601 | ||||||
Other |
19,963 | 29,738 | 32,119 | |||||||||
Total other liabilities |
$ | 103,788 | $ | 107,037 | $ | 109,720 | ||||||
14. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is a member of South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (SAC), a manufacturing cooperative from
which it is obligated to purchase 17.5 million cases of finished product on an annual basis
through May 2014. The Company is also a member of Southeastern Container (Southeastern), a
plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative from which it is obligated to purchase at least 80% of
its requirements of plastic bottles for certain designated territories. See Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning SAC and Southeastern.
The Company guarantees a portion of SACs and Southeasterns debt and lease obligations. The
amounts guaranteed were $38.4 million, $39.9 million and $42.1 million as of September 27, 2009,
December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008, respectively. The Company has not recorded any liability
associated with these guarantees and holds no assets as collateral against these guarantees. The
guarantees relate to the debt and lease obligations of SAC and Southeastern, which resulted
primarily from the purchase of production equipment and facilities. These guarantees expire at
various dates through 2021. The members of both cooperatives consist solely of Coca-Cola
bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to fulfill their
commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient assets,
including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust selling
prices of their products which adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the Companys
guarantees.
In the event either of these cooperatives fails to fulfill its commitments under the related debt
and lease obligations, the Company would be responsible for payments to the lenders up to the
level of the guarantees. If these cooperatives had borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, the
Companys maximum exposure under these guarantees on September 27, 2009 would have been $25.2
million for both SAC and Southeastern and the Companys maximum total exposure, including its
equity investments, would have been $30.8 million for SAC and $38.5 million for Southeastern.
The Company has been purchasing plastic bottles from Southeastern and finished products from SAC
for more than ten years and has never had to pay against these guarantees.
18
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
14. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has an equity ownership interest in each of the entities in addition to the guarantees
of certain indebtedness and records its investment in each under the equity method. As of
September 27, 2009, SAC had total assets of approximately $41 million and total debt of
approximately $20 million. SAC had total revenues for YTD 2009 of approximately $128 million. As
of September 27, 2009, Southeastern had total assets of approximately $397 million and total debt
of approximately $224 million. Southeastern had total revenue for YTD 2009 of approximately $434
million.
The Company has standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty
insurance programs. On September 27, 2009, these letters of credit totaled $25.6 million. The
Company was required to maintain $4.5 million of restricted cash for letters of credit beginning
in the second quarter of 2009.
The Company participates in long-term marketing contractual arrangements with certain prestige
properties, athletic venues and other locations. The future payments related to these contractual
arrangements as of September 27, 2009 amounted to $22.5 million and expire at various dates
through 2017.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary
course of its business. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims
and legal proceedings, management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, cash flows or results of operations of the
Company. No material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is believed to be reasonably
possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings.
The Company is subject to audit by tax authorities in jurisdictions where it conducts business.
These audits may result in assessments that are subsequently resolved with the tax authorities or
potentially through the courts. Management believes the Company has adequately provided for any
assessments that are likely to result from these audits; however, final assessments, if any, could
be different than the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
15. Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for YTD 2009 and YTD 2008 was 24.8% and 48.2%,
respectively.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the income tax expense at the statutory federal
rate to actual income tax expense.
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Statutory expense |
$ | 16,826 | $ | 5,184 | ||||
State income taxes, net of federal effect |
2,094 | 645 | ||||||
Manufacturing deduction benefit |
(1,197 | ) | (487 | ) | ||||
Meals and entertainment |
754 | 507 | ||||||
Adjustment for uncertain tax positions |
(7,070 | ) | 1,277 | |||||
Other, net |
521 | 9 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 11,928 | $ | 7,135 | ||||
19
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
15. Income Taxes
The Company had $10.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest as of
December 28, 2008, of which $9.4 million would affect the Companys effective tax rate if
recognized. As of September 27, 2009, the Company had $3.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits,
including accrued interest, of which all would affect the Companys effective rate if recognized.
It is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next 12 months;
however, the Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
income tax expense. As of December 28, 2008, the Company had approximately $2.5 million of accrued
interest related to uncertain tax positions. As of September 27, 2009, the Company had
approximately $.8 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. Income tax
expense included an interest credit of approximately $1.7 million in YTD 2009 and interest expense
of approximately $.4 million in YTD 2008.
In Q1 2009, the Company reached an agreement with a taxing authority to settle prior tax positions
for which the Company had previously provided reserves due to uncertainty of resolution. As a
result, the Company reduced the liability for uncertain tax positions by $1.7 million. The net
effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense of approximately $1.7 million.
In Q3 2009, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $5.4 million. The net
effect of the adjustment was a decrease to income tax expense of approximately $5.4 million. The
reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions was due mainly to the lapse of applicable
statutes of limitations.
Various tax years from 1991 remain open to examination by taxing jurisdictions to which the Company
is subject due to loss carryforwards.
The Companys income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based
on the Companys ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that
becomes available to the Company.
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of adjustments relative to the Companys pension
and postretirement medical benefit plans and foreign currency translation adjustments required for
a subsidiary of the Company that performs data analysis and provides consulting services outside
the United States.
20
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for Q3 2009 and Q3 2008 follows:
June 28, | Pre-tax | Tax | Sept. 27, | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | Activity | Effect | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Net pension activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
$ | (53,880 | ) | $ | 2,339 | $ | (921 | ) | $ | (52,462 | ) | |||||
Prior service costs |
(40 | ) | 4 | (2 | ) | (38 | ) | |||||||||
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(9,361 | ) | 218 | (86 | ) | (9,229 | ) | |||||||||
Prior service costs |
7,917 | (446 | ) | 176 | 7,647 | |||||||||||
Transition asset |
33 | (6 | ) | 2 | 29 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
12 | 4 | (1 | ) | 15 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | (55,319 | ) | $ | 2,113 | $ | (832 | ) | $ | (54,038 | ) | |||||
June 29, | Pre-tax | Tax | Sept. 28, | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | Activity | Effect | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Net pension activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
$ | (12,525 | ) | $ | 111 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | (12,456 | ) | |||||
Prior service costs |
(49 | ) | 4 | (2 | ) | (47 | ) | |||||||||
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(9,505 | ) | 229 | (88 | ) | (9,364 | ) | |||||||||
Prior service costs |
9,009 | (446 | ) | 171 | 8,734 | |||||||||||
Transition asset |
49 | (6 | ) | 2 | 45 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
30 | (17 | ) | 7 | 20 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | (12,991 | ) | $ | (125 | ) | $ | 48 | $ | (13,068 | ) | |||||
A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for YTD 2009 and YTD 2008 follows:
Dec. 28, | Pre-tax | Tax | Sept. 27, | |||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2008 | Activity | Effect | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Net pension activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
$ | (56,717 | ) | $ | 7,017 | $ | (2,762 | ) | $ | (52,462 | ) | |||||
Prior service costs |
(45 | ) | 12 | (5 | ) | (38 | ) | |||||||||
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(9,625 | ) | 653 | (257 | ) | (9,229 | ) | |||||||||
Prior service costs |
8,459 | (1,339 | ) | 527 | 7,647 | |||||||||||
Transition asset |
41 | (19 | ) | 7 | 29 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
14 | 1 | | 15 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (57,873 | ) | $ | 6,325 | $ | (2,490 | ) | $ | (54,038 | ) | |||||
21
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Remeasurement | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 30, | After | Pre-tax | Tax | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2007 | tax(1) | Activity | Effect | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Net pension activity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
$ | (12,684 | ) | $ | 23 | $ | 333 | $ | (128 | ) | $ | (12,456 | ) | |||||||
Prior service costs |
(55 | ) | 1 | 12 | (5 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net postretirement benefits activity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss |
(9,928 | ) | 141 | 687 | (264 | ) | (9,364 | ) | ||||||||||||
Prior service costs |
9,833 | (275 | ) | (1,338 | ) | 514 | 8,734 | |||||||||||||
Transition asset |
60 | (4 | ) | (18 | ) | 7 | 45 | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
23 | | (5 | ) | 2 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (12,751 | ) | $ | (114 | ) | $ | (329 | ) | $ | 126 | $ | (13,068 | ) | ||||||
(1) | See Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information. |
17. Capital Transactions
The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.
The Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Marketsm under the symbol COKE.
There is no established public trading market for the Class B Common Stock. Shares of the Class B
Common Stock are convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock at any time at
the option of the holders of Class B Common Stock.
No cash dividend or dividend of property or stock other than stock of the Company, as specifically
described in the Companys certificate of incorporation, may be declared and paid on the Class B
Common Stock unless an equal or greater dividend is declared and paid on the Common Stock. During
YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, dividends of $.75 per share were declared and paid on both Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock.
Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B Common
Stock is entitled to 20 votes per share at all meetings of stockholders. Except as otherwise
required by law, holders of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote together as a single
class on all matters brought before the Companys stockholders. In the event of liquidation,
there is no preference between the two classes of common stock.
On May 12, 1999, the stockholders of the Company approved a restricted stock award for J. Frank
Harrison, III, the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer,
consisting of 200,000 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock. Under the award, shares of
restricted stock were granted at a rate of 20,000 shares per year over a ten-year period. The
vesting of each annual installment was contingent upon the Company achieving at least 80% of the
overall goal achievement factor in the Companys Annual Bonus Plan. The restricted stock award did
not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in dividend or voting rights until each installment
had vested and the shares were issued. The restricted stock award expired at the end of fiscal
year 2008. Each annual 20,000 share tranche had an independent performance requirement as it
22
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
was not established until the Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets were approved each year by the
Companys Board of Directors. As a result, each 20,000 share tranche was considered to have its
own service inception date, grant-date fair value and requisite service period. The Companys
Annual Bonus Plan targets, which established the performance requirement for the restricted stock
awards, were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in the first quarter
of each year. The Company reimbursed Mr. Harrison, III for income taxes to be paid on the shares
if the performance requirement was met and the shares were issued. The Company accrued the
estimated cost of the income tax reimbursement over the one-year service period.
A summary of the restricted stock award for 2008 was as follows:
Potential | ||||||||||||||||
Annual | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Grant-Date | Compensation | Compensation | |||||||||||||
Year | Awarded | Price | Expense | Expense | ||||||||||||
2008 |
20,000 | $ | 56.50 | $ | 1,130,000 | |
As of the end of Q3 2008, the Company estimated it would not achieve at least 80% of the overall
goal achievement factor in the Companys 2008 Annual Bonus Plan required for the restricted stock
award to vest. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recorded in Q3 2008 or YTD 2008, based
upon the Companys estimate. On March 4, 2009, the Compensation Committee determined 20,000 shares
of restricted Class B Common Stock vested and should be issued to Mr. Harrison, III for the fiscal
year ended December 28, 2008.
On April 29, 2008, the stockholders of the Company approved a Performance Unit Award Agreement for
Mr. Harrison, III consisting of 400,000 performance units (Units). Each Unit represents the
right to receive one share of the Companys Class B Common Stock, subject to certain terms and
conditions. The Units will vest in annual increments over a ten-year period starting in fiscal
year 2009. The number of Units that vest each year will equal the product of 40,000 multiplied by
the overall goal achievement factor (not to exceed 100%) under the Companys Annual Bonus Plan.
The Performance Unit Award Agreement replaced the restricted stock award previously discussed.
Each annual 40,000 unit tranche has an independent performance requirement as it is not
established until the Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets are approved each year by the Companys
Board of Directors. As a result, each 40,000 unit tranche is considered to have its own service
inception date and requisite service period. The Companys Annual Bonus Plan targets, which
establish the performance requirements for the Performance Unit Award Agreement, are approved by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in the first quarter of each year. The
Performance Unit Award Agreement does not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in dividends or
voting rights until each installment has vested and the shares are issued. Mr. Harrison, III may
satisfy tax withholding requirements in whole or in part by requiring the Company to settle in
cash such number of Units otherwise payable in Class B Common Stock to meet the maximum statutory
tax withholding requirements.
Compensation expense for the Performance Unit Award Agreement recognized in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009 was $.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, which was based upon a share price
of $48.80 on September 25, 2009.
23
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
17. Capital Transactions
On February 19, 2009, The Coca-Cola Company converted all of its 497,670 shares of the Companys
Class B Common Stock into an equivalent number of shares of the Companys Common Stock.
The increase in the total number of shares outstanding in YTD 2009 was due to the issuance of
20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the restricted stock award. The increase in the
number of shares of Common Stock outstanding in YTD 2009 was due to the conversion by The
Coca-Cola Company of 497,670 shares of Class B Common Stock into 497,670 shares of Common Stock
plus the conversion of another 100 shares of Class B Common Stock into 100 shares of Common Stock.
The decrease in the number of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding in YTD 2009 was due to
the conversion by The Coca-Cola Company of 497,670 shares of Class B Common Stock into 497,670
shares of Common Stock plus the conversion of another 100 shares of Class B Common Stock into 100
shares of Common Stock, offset by the issuance of 20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock related to
the restricted stock award.
The increase in the total number of shares outstanding in YTD 2008 was due to the issuance of
20,000 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the restricted stock award.
18. Benefit Plans
Recently Adopted Pronouncement
In September 2006, the FASB issued new guidance on employers accounting for defined pension and
other postretirement plans, which was effective for the year ending December 31, 2006 except for
the requirement that the benefit plan assets and obligations be measured as of the date of the
employers statement of financial position, which was effective for the year ending December 28,
2008. The Company adopted the measurement date provisions of this new guidance on the first day of
the first quarter of 2008 and used the one measurement approach. The incremental effect of
applying the measurement date provisions on the balance sheet in the first quarter of 2008 was as
follows:
24
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
Before | After | |||||||||||
Remeasurement | Remeasurement | |||||||||||
In Thousands | Adjustment | Adjustment | Adjustment | |||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
$ | 32,758 | $ | 434 | $ | 33,192 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
168,540 | (167 | ) | 168,373 | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,123,290 | 267 | 1,123,557 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
79,227 | (153 | ) | 79,074 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(12,751 | ) | (114 | ) | (12,865 | ) | ||||||
Total equity |
168,509 | (267 | ) | 168,242 |
Pension Plans
Retirement benefits under the two Company-sponsored pension plans are based on the employees
length of service, average compensation over the five consecutive years that give the highest
average compensation and average Social Security taxable wage base during the 35-year period
before reaching Social Security retirement age. Contributions to the plans are based on the
projected unit credit actuarial funding method and are limited to the amounts currently deductible
for income tax purposes. On February 22, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an
amendment to the principal Company-sponsored pension plan to cease further benefit accruals under
the plan effective June 30, 2006.
The components of net periodic pension cost (income) were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 23 | $ | 20 | $ | 68 | $ | 61 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
2,788 | 2,701 | 8,365 | 8,104 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(2,270 | ) | (3,410 | ) | (6,810 | ) | (10,231 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
4 | 4 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
2,339 | 111 | 7,017 | 333 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost (income) |
$ | 2,884 | $ | (574 | ) | $ | 8,652 | $ | (1,721 | ) | ||||||
The
Company has contributed $10.1 million and $0.2 million to
its Company-sponsored pension plans during YTD 2009 and YTD 2008,
respectively, and does not anticipate making any additional contributions for the remainder of 2009.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides postretirement benefits for a portion of its current employees. The Company
recognizes the cost of postretirement benefits, which consist principally of medical benefits,
during employees periods of active service. The Company does not pre-fund these benefits and has
the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefits in the future.
25
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
18. Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 158 | $ | 128 | $ | 473 | $ | 384 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
557 | 536 | 1,672 | 1,608 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized transitional assets |
(6 | ) | (6 | ) | (19 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
218 | 229 | 653 | 687 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
(446 | ) | (446 | ) | (1,339 | ) | (1,338 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
$ | 481 | $ | 441 | $ | 1,440 | $ | 1,323 | ||||||||
401(k) Savings Plan
The Company provides a 401(k) Savings Plan for substantially all of its employees who are not part
of collective bargaining agreements. The Company suspended matching contributions to its 401(k)
Savings Plan effective April 1, 2009. The Company maintains the option to match its employees
401(k) Savings Plan contributions based on the financial results for 2009. In Q3 2009, the Company
decided to match its employees contributions for the period of April 1, 2009 through August 31,
2009. The Company accrued for a payment of $3.6 million to the 401(k) Savings Plan for the five
month period. This payment was made in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Multi-Employer Benefits
The Company entered into a new agreement in Q3 2008 when one of its collective bargaining contracts
expired in July 2008. The new agreement allows the Company to freeze its liability to Central
States, a multi-employer defined benefit pension fund, while preserving the pension benefits
previously earned by the employees. As a result of freezing the Companys liability to Central
States, the Company recorded a charge of $13.6 million in the second half of 2008. The Company
paid $3.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 to the Southern States Savings and Retirement Plan
(Southern States) under the agreement to freeze the Central States liability. The remaining $10.6
million was the present value amount, using a discount rate of 7%, that will be paid to Central
States and was recorded in other liabilities. The Company will pay approximately $1 million
annually over the next 20 years. In addition, the Company will also make future contributions on
behalf of these employees to Southern States.
19. Related Party Transactions
The Companys business consists primarily of the production, marketing and distribution of
nonalcoholic beverages of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole owner of the secret formulas
under which the primary components (either concentrate or syrup) of its beverage products are
manufactured. As of September 27, 2009, The Coca-Cola Company had a 27.1% interest in the
Companys total outstanding Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on a combined basis.
26
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
The following table summarizes the significant transactions between the Company and The Coca-Cola
Company:
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Millions | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Payments by the Company for concentrate, syrup,
sweetener and other purchases |
$ | 277.4 | $ | 286.5 | ||||
Marketing funding support payments to the Company |
35.1 | 35.3 | ||||||
Payments by the Company net of marketing funding support |
$ | 242.3 | $ | 251.2 | ||||
Payments by the Company for customer marketing programs |
$ | 39.4 | $ | 37.1 | ||||
Payments by the Company for cold drink equipment parts |
5.3 | 5.3 | ||||||
Fountain delivery and equipment repair fees paid to the Company |
8.5 | 7.5 | ||||||
Presence marketing funding support provided by
The Coca-Cola Company on the Companys behalf |
3.0 | 3.0 | ||||||
Sales of finished products to The Coca-Cola Company |
1.1 | 5.9 | ||||||
The Company has a production arrangement with Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (CCE) to buy and sell
finished products at cost. Sales to CCE under this arrangement were $38.2 million and $30.2
million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively. Purchases from CCE under this arrangement were
$10.1 million and $15.2 million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively. The Coca-Cola Company has
significant equity interests in the Company and CCE. As of September 27, 2009, CCE held
approximately 6% of the Companys outstanding Common Stock and held no shares of the Companys
Class B Common Stock.
Along with all other Coca-Cola bottlers in the United States, the Company is a member in Coca-Cola
Bottlers Sales and Services Company, LLC (CCBSS), which was formed in 2003 for the
purposes of facilitating various procurement functions and distributing certain specified beverage
products of The Coca-Cola Company with the intention of enhancing the efficiency and
competitiveness of the Coca-Cola bottling system in the United States. CCBSS negotiates the
procurement for the majority of the Companys raw materials (excluding concentrate). The Company
pays an administrative fee to CCBSS for its services.
The Company is a member of SAC, a manufacturing cooperative. SAC sells finished products to the
Company and Piedmont at cost. Purchases from SAC by the Company and Piedmont for finished products
were $100.2 million and $111.5 million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively. The Company also
manages the operations of SAC pursuant to a management agreement. Management fees earned from SAC
were $.9 million in YTD 2009 and $1.1 million in YTD 2008. The Company has also guaranteed a
portion of debt for SAC. Such guarantee amounted to $19.7 million as of September 27, 2009. The
Companys equity investment in SAC was $5.6 million, $4.1 million and $4.1 million as of September
27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008, respectively.
The Company is a shareholder in two entities from which it purchases substantially all its
requirements for plastic bottles. Net purchases from these entities were $51.3 million and $54.3
million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively. In connection with its participation in one of
these entities, the Company has guaranteed a portion of
27
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
19. Related Party Transactions
the entitys debt. Such guarantee amounted to $18.7 million as of September 27, 2009. The
Companys equity investment in one of these entities, Southeastern, was $13.3 million, $11.0
million and $11.0 million as of September 27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008,
respectively.
The Company monitors its investments in cooperatives and would be required to write down its
investment if an impairment is identified and the Company determined it to be other-than-temporary.
No impairment of the Companys investments in cooperatives has been identified as of September 27,
2009 nor was there any impairment in 2008.
The Company recorded an adjustment to increase its equity investment in Southeastern in the second
quarter of 2008 which resulted in a nonrecurring pre-tax credit of $2.6 million. This adjustment
was based on new information received from Southeastern during that quarter and reflected a higher
share of Southeasterns retained earnings compared to the amount previously recorded. The Company
classifies its equity in earnings of Southeastern in cost of sales consistent with the
classification of purchases from Southeastern.
The Company leases from Harrison Limited Partnership One (HLP) the Snyder Production Center and
an adjacent sales facility, which are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. The current lease
expires on December 31, 2010. HLP is directly and indirectly owned by trusts of which J. Frank
Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Deborah H. Everhart, a director of the Company, are trustees and beneficiaries. On March 23, 2009,
the Company modified the lease agreement (new terms to begin January 1, 2011) with HLP related to
the SPC lease. The modified lease would not have changed the classification of the existing lease
had it been in effect in the first quarter of 2002, when the capital lease was recorded, as the
Company received a renewal option to extend the term of the lease, which it expected to exercise.
The modified lease did not extend the term of the existing lease (remaining lease term was reduced
from approximately 22 years to approximately 12 years). Accordingly, the present value of the
leased property under capital leases and capital lease obligations was adjusted by an amount equal
to the difference between the future minimum lease payments under the modified lease agreement and
the present value of the existing obligation on the modification date. The capital lease
obligations and leased property under capital leases were both decreased by $7.5 million in March
2009. The annual base rent the Company is obligated to pay under the modified lease is subject to
an adjustment for an inflation factor. The prior lease annual base rent was subject to adjustment
for an inflation factor and for increases or decreases in interest rates, using LIBOR as the
measurement device. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease as of September 27,
2009 was $29.3 million. Rental payments related to this lease were $2.6 million and $2.8 million
in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively.
The Company leases from Beacon Investment Corporation (Beacon) the Companys headquarters office
facility and an adjacent office facility. The lease expires on December 31, 2021. Beacons sole
shareholder is J. Frank Harrison, III. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease
as of September 27, 2009 was $31.4 million. Rental payments related to the lease were $2.8 million
in both YTD 2009 and YTD 2008.
28
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
20. Net Sales by Product Category
Net
sales by product category were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Bottle/can sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
$ | 257,289 | $ | 258,200 | $ | 749,488 | $ | 762,741 | ||||||||
Still beverages |
59,694 | 66,160 | 166,629 | 186,020 | ||||||||||||
Total bottle/can sales |
316,983 | 324,360 | 916,117 | 948,761 | ||||||||||||
Other sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
31,822 | 31,231 | 98,433 | 94,356 | ||||||||||||
Post-mix and other |
25,751 | 25,972 | 74,016 | 72,123 | ||||||||||||
Total other sales |
57,573 | 57,203 | 172,449 | 166,479 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 374,556 | $ | 381,563 | $ | 1,088,566 | $ | 1,115,240 | ||||||||
Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages and energy products while still beverages are
noncarbonated beverages.
29
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income (loss) per share and diluted net
income (loss) per share under the two-class method:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Consolidated |
$ | 15,428 | $ | (3,145 | ) | $ | 36,146 | $ | 7,675 | |||||||
Less dividends: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
1,785 | 1,661 | 5,285 | 4,983 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
505 | 625 | 1,587 | 1,875 | ||||||||||||
Total undistributed earnings (losses) |
$ | 13,138 | $ | (5,431 | ) | $ | 29,274 | $ | 817 | |||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
$ | 10,239 | $ | (3,946 | ) | $ | 22,511 | $ | 594 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
2,899 | (1,485 | ) | 6,763 | 223 | |||||||||||
Total undistributed earnings (losses) basic |
$ | 13,138 | $ | (5,431 | ) | $ | 29,274 | $ | 817 | |||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses) diluted |
$ | 10,194 | $ | (3,946 | ) | $ | 22,438 | $ | 593 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
diluted |
2,944 | (1,485 | ) | 6,836 | 224 | |||||||||||
Total undistributed earnings (losses) diluted |
$ | 13,138 | $ | (5,431 | ) | $ | 29,274 | $ | 817 | |||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Common Stock |
$ | 1,785 | $ | 1,661 | $ | 5,285 | $ | 4,983 | ||||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses) basic |
10,239 | (3,946 | ) | 22,511 | 594 | |||||||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Common
Stock share |
$ | 12,024 | $ | (2,285 | ) | $ | 27,796 | $ | 5,577 | |||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
$ | 505 | $ | 625 | $ | 1,587 | $ | 1,875 | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
basic |
2,899 | (1,485 | ) | 6,763 | 223 | |||||||||||
Numerator for basic net income (loss) per Class B
Common Stock share |
$ | 3,404 | $ | (860 | ) | $ | 8,350 | $ | 2,098 | |||||||
30
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Common Stock |
$ | 1,785 | $ | 1,661 | $ | 5,285 | $ | 4,983 | ||||||||
Dividends on Class B Common Stock
assumed converted to Common Stock |
505 | 625 | 1,587 | 1,875 | ||||||||||||
Common Stock undistributed earnings (losses)
diluted |
13,138 | (5,431 | ) | 29,274 | 817 | |||||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock share |
$ | 15,428 | $ | (3,145 | ) | $ | 36,146 | $ | 7,675 | |||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per Class B |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends on Class B Common Stock |
$ | 505 | $ | 625 | $ | 1,587 | $ | 1,875 | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings
(losses) diluted |
2,944 | (1,485 | ) | 6,836 | 224 | |||||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income (loss) per |
||||||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock share |
$ | 3,449 | $ | (860 | ) | $ | 8,423 | $ | 2,099 | |||||||
31
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
21. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
7,141 | 6,644 | 7,047 | 6,644 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding basic |
2,022 | 2,500 | 2,117 | 2,500 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted (assumes conversion of
Class B Common Stock to Common Stock) |
9,203 | 9,144 | 9,194 | 9,159 | ||||||||||||
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
outstanding diluted |
2,062 | 2,500 | 2,147 | 2,515 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.94 | $ | .84 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.94 | $ | .84 | |||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.93 | $ | .84 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 1.67 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 3.92 | $ | .83 | |||||||
NOTES TO TABLE
(1) | For purposes of the diluted net income (loss) per share computation for Common Stock, shares
of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be converted; therefore, 100% of undistributed earnings
(losses) is allocated to Common Stock. |
|
(2) | For purposes of the diluted net income (loss) per share computation for Class B Common Stock,
weighted average shares of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be outstanding for the entire
period and not converted. |
|
(3) | Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share for Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock includes the dilutive effect of shares relative to the restricted stock awards. |
32
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
22. Risks and Uncertainties
Approximately 88% of the Companys YTD 2009 bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of
The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of these products or of the concentrates or
syrups required to manufacture these products. The remaining 12% of the Companys YTD 2009
bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of other beverage companies or those owned by
the Company. The Company has beverage agreements under which it has various requirements to meet.
Failure to meet the requirements of these beverage agreements could result in the loss of
distribution rights for the respective product.
The Companys products are sold and distributed directly by its employees to retail stores and
other outlets. During YTD 2009, approximately 68% of the Companys bottle/can volume to retail
customers was sold for future consumption. The remaining bottle/can volume to retail customers of
approximately 32% was sold for immediate consumption. The Companys largest customers, Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 19% and 11%, respectively, of the
Companys total bottle/can volume to retail customers during YTD 2009 and accounted for
approximately 19% and 12%, respectively, of the Companys total bottle/can volume to retail
customers during YTD 2008. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. accounted for approximately 15% and approximately
14% of the Companys total net sales during YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively.
The Company obtains all of its aluminum cans from one domestic supplier. The Company currently
obtains all of its plastic bottles from two domestic entities. See Note 14 and Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
The Company is exposed to price risk on such commodities as aluminum, corn and resin which affects
the cost of raw materials used in the production of finished products. The Company both produces
and procures these finished products. Examples of the raw materials affected are aluminum cans and
plastic bottles used for packaging and high fructose corn syrup used as a product ingredient.
Further, the Company is exposed to commodity price risk on oil which impacts the Companys cost of
fuel used in the movement and delivery of the Companys products. The Company participates in
commodity hedging and risk mitigation programs administered both by CCBSS and by the Company. In
addition, there is no limit on the price The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies can
charge for concentrate.
Certain liabilities of the Company are subject to risk due to changes in both long-term and
short-term interest rates. These liabilities include floating rate debt, leases, retirement benefit
obligations and the Companys pension liability.
Approximately 7% of the Companys labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. One
collective bargaining contract covering approximately .5% of the Companys employees expired during
Q3 2009 and the Company entered into a new agreement on July 22, 2009.
33
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
23. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Changes in current assets and current liabilities affecting cash were as follows:
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, trade, net |
$ | 3,586 | $ | (13,081 | ) | |||
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company |
(14,006 | ) | (8,861 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable, other |
(4,025 | ) | (3,672 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(2,265 | ) | (2,061 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(4,355 | ) | 1,259 | |||||
Accounts payable, trade |
(9,786 | ) | (14,252 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company |
8,290 | 26,749 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
12,162 | 10,332 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
(1,554 | ) | (5,884 | ) | ||||
Accrued interest payable |
4,348 | 6,643 | ||||||
Increase in current assets less current liabilities |
$ | (7,605 | ) | $ | (2,828 | ) | ||
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued new guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The new
guidance does not require any new fair value measurements but could change the Companys current practices
in measuring fair value. The new guidance was effective at the beginning of
the first quarter of 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. In February 2008, the
FASB issued additional guidance which deferred the application date of the provisions of new
guidance for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities until Q1 2009 except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The
adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements as of YTD 2009, but could have a material effect in the future. See Note 12
to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance which established principles and requirements for
recognizing and measuring identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The
new guidance was effective for Q1 2009. The impact on the Company of adopting this new guidance
will depend on the nature, terms and size of business combinations completed after the effective
date.
34
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance to establish new accounting and new reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (commonly referred to previously as
minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This new guidance was effective
for the Company as of the beginning of Q1 2009 and is being applied prospectively, except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively. The adoption of
this new guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which amends and expands the disclosure requirements
relative to derivative instruments to provide an enhanced understanding of why an entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and
how they affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The new
guidance was effective for Q1 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact the Companys
consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote disclosures related to derivative
instruments and related hedged items. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
In April 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which amends the factors to be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of intangible assets. The
intent of the new guidance is to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible
asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure its fair value. The new guidance was
effective for Q1 2009. The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on
the accounting for future acquisitions or renewals of intangible assets, but the potential impact
is dependent upon the acquisitions or renewals of intangible assets in the future.
In September 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which requires a seller of credit derivatives to
provide certain disclosures for each credit derivative (or group of similar credit derivatives).
The new guidance also requires guarantors to disclose the current status of payment/performance
risk of guarantees and clarifies the effective date of the new guidance relative to derivative
instruments discussed above. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or
liability when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly. The new guidance was effective
for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which amends the other-than-temporary impairment
guidance for debt securities to make the other-than-temporary impairment guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and
equity securities. The new guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June
15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
35
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which requires disclosures about the fair value of
financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in
annual financial statements. The new guidance was effective for interim periods ending after June
15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relative to subsequent events which does not result in
significant changes in the subsequent events that an entity reports in its financial statements.
The new guidance requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the
financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The new guidance was effective
for the Company in the second quarter of 2009, and the required disclosure has been included in
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) became the source of
authoritative United States GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.
The Codification did not change GAAP. The Codification was effective for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. Pursuant to the provisions of the Codification, the
Company updated references to GAAP in the Companys consolidated financial statements. The
Codification did not change GAAP and therefore did not impact the Companys consolidated financial
statements other than the change in references.
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which requires enhanced disclosures about plan
assets of a companys defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The enhanced
disclosures are intended to provide users of financial statements with a greater understanding of
(1) employers investment strategies; (2) major categories of plan assets; (3) the inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan assets for the
period; and (5) concentration of risk within plan assets. The new guidance is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance will not impact
the Companys consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote disclosures related
to the Companys pension plan assets.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which eliminates the exceptions for qualifying
special-purpose entities from consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale
accounting for certain mortgage securitization when a transferor has not surrendered control over
the transferred financial assets. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods that
begin after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
36
Table of Contents
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
24. New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards
calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity (VIE) with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the
power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the entitys economic
performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity.
The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods that begin after November 15, 2009. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, FASB issued new guidance on measuring the fair value of liabilities. The new
guidance clarifies that the quoted price for the identical liability, when traded as an asset in an
active market, is a Level 1 measurement for that liability when no adjustment to the quoted price
is required. The new guidance also gives guidance on valuation techniques in the absence of a
Level 1 measurement. The new guidance is effective for the Company in the fourth quarter of 2009.
The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
25. Restructuring Expenses
On July 15, 2008, the Company initiated a plan to reorganize the structure of its operating units
and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or
approximately 5% of its workforce. As a result of this plan, the Company incurred $4.6 million in
pre-tax restructuring expenses in 2008 for one-time termination benefits.
The following table summarizes restructuring activity, which is included in selling, delivery and
administrative expenses, for the year ended December 28, 2008 and the first nine months of the year
ended September 27, 2009.
Severance Pay | Relocation | |||||||||||
In Thousands | and Benefits | and Other | Total | |||||||||
Balance at December 30, 2007 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Provision |
4,559 | 63 | 4,622 | |||||||||
Cash payments |
3,583 | 50 | 3,633 | |||||||||
Balance at December 28, 2008 |
976 | 13 | 989 | |||||||||
Provision |
| | | |||||||||
Cash payments |
914 | 13 | 927 | |||||||||
Balance at September 27, 2009 |
$ | 62 | $ | | $ | 62 | ||||||
37
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(M,D&A) should be read in conjunction with Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidateds (the Company)
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements. M,D&A includes the following sections:
| Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry a general description of the
Companys business and the nonalcoholic beverage industry. |
||
| Areas of Emphasis a summary of the Companys key priorities. |
||
| Overview of Operations and Financial Condition a summary of key information and
trends concerning the financial results for the third quarter of 2009 (Q3 2009) and the
first nine months of 2009 (YTD 2009) and changes from the third quarter of 2008 (Q3
2008) and the first nine months of 2008 (YTD 2008). |
||
| Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
a discussion of accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of the
Companys financial condition and results of operations and that require critical judgments
and estimates and the expected impact of new accounting pronouncements. |
||
| Results of Operations an analysis of the Companys results of operations for Q3 2009
and YTD 2009 compared to Q3 2008 and YTD 2008. |
||
| Financial Condition an analysis of the Companys financial condition as of the end of
Q3 2009 compared to year-end 2008 and the end of Q3 2008 as presented in the consolidated
financial statements. |
||
| Liquidity and Capital Resources an analysis of capital resources, cash sources and
uses, investing activities, financing activities, off-balance sheet arrangements, aggregate
contractual obligations and hedging activities. |
||
| Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. |
The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the Company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries including Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (Piedmont). The
noncontrolling interest consists of The Coca-Cola Companys interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7%
for all periods presented.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance on
accounting for the noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements. The Company
implemented the new guidance effective December 29, 2008, the beginning of the first quarter of
2009 (Q1 2009). The new guidance changes the accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (commonly referred to previously as minority interest).
Piedmont is the Companys only subsidiary that has a noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling
interest income of $1.0 million in Q3 2009, $2.0 million in YTD 2009, $.7 million in Q3 2008 and
$1.7 million in YTD 2008 have been reclassified to be included in net income on the Companys
consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to both the Company and the noncontrolling interest are shown on the Companys
consolidated statements of operations. Noncontrolling interest related to Piedmont totaled $52.4
million, $50.4 million and $49.7 million at September 27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and September 28,
2008, respectively. These amounts have been reclassified as noncontrolling interest in the equity
section of the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
38
Table of Contents
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry
The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The
Coca-Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and popular beverage brands in the
world. The Company is the second largest bottler of products of The Coca-Cola Company in the
United States, distributing these products in eleven states primarily in the Southeast. The
Company also distributes several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both
sparkling and still beverages. Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages including energy
products. Still beverages are noncarbonated beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready to drink
coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports drinks. The Company had net sales of approximately $1.5
billion in 2008.
The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Companys competitors include bottlers
and distributors of nationally and regionally advertised and marketed products and private label
products. In each region in which the Company operates, between 85% and 95% of sparkling beverage
sales in bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its principal
competitors, which in each region includes the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions,
the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown and/or 7-Up products. During the last several years,
industry sales of sugar sparkling beverages, other than energy products, have declined. The
decline in sugar sparkling beverages has generally been offset by sales growth in other
nonalcoholic product categories. The sparkling beverage category (including energy products)
represents 82% of the Companys YTD 2009 bottle/can net sales.
The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are point-of-sale
merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and dispensing equipment, packaging changes,
pricing, price promotions, product quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of
distribution and merchandising, and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in its
territories with respect to each of these methods.
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and the first nine months of the fiscal year
have not been representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results
primarily from higher unit sales of the Companys products in the second and third quarters versus
the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are
not significantly impacted by business seasonality.
The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of the first
day of the fourth quarter. During YTD 2009, the Company believes it has not experienced any events
or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying amounts of the Companys franchise rights or
goodwill exceeded fair values. As such, the Company has not performed an interim impairment test
during YTD 2009 and has not recognized any impairments of franchise rights or goodwill.
39
Table of Contents
Net sales by product category were as follows:
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Bottle/can sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including energy products) |
$ | 257,289 | $ | 258,200 | $ | 749,488 | $ | 762,741 | ||||||||
Still beverages |
59,694 | 66,160 | 166,629 | 186,020 | ||||||||||||
Total bottle/can sales |
316,983 | 324,360 | 916,117 | 948,761 | ||||||||||||
Other sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers |
31,822 | 31,231 | 98,433 | 94,356 | ||||||||||||
Post-mix and other |
25,751 | 25,972 | 74,016 | 72,123 | ||||||||||||
Total other sales |
57,573 | 57,203 | 172,449 | 166,479 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 374,556 | $ | 381,563 | $ | 1,088,566 | $ | 1,115,240 | ||||||||
Areas of Emphasis
Key priorities for the Company include revenue management, product innovation and beverage
portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity.
Revenue Management
Revenue management requires a strategy which reflects consideration for pricing of brands and
packages within product categories and channels, highly effective working relationships with
customers and disciplined fact-based decision-making. Revenue management has been and continues to
be a key performance driver which has a significant impact on the Companys results of operations.
Product Innovation and Beverage Portfolio Expansion
Sparkling beverages volume, other than energy products, has declined over the past several years.
Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and will continue to be critical to the
Companys overall revenue. The Company began distributing Monster Energy® drinks in
certain of the Companys territories beginning in November 2008. The Company introduced the
following new products during 2007: smartwater®, vitaminwater®,
vitaminenergy, Gold Peak and Country Breeze tea products, juice products
from FUZE® (a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company) and V8® juice products
from the Campbell Soup Company. The Company also modified its energy product portfolio in 2007
with the addition of NOS® products from FUZE®.
In October 2008, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Hansen Beverage Company
(Hansen), the developer, marketer, seller and distributor of Monster Energy® drinks,
the leading volume brand in the United States energy category. Under this agreement, the Company
has the right to distribute Monster Energy® drinks in certain of the Companys
territories. The agreement has a term of 20 years and can be terminated by either party under
certain circumstances, subject to a termination penalty in certain cases. In conjunction with the
execution of this agreement, the Company was required to pay Hansen $2.3 million. This amount
equals the amount that Hansen was required to pay to the distributors of Monster Energy®
drinks to terminate the prior distribution agreements. The Company has recorded the payment to
Hansen as distribution rights and will amortize the amount on a straight-line basis to selling,
delivery and administrative (S,D&A) expenses over the 20-year term of the agreement.
40
Table of Contents
In August 2007, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Energy Brands Inc. (Energy
Brands), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company. Energy Brands, also known as
glacéau, is a producer and distributor of branded enhanced beverages including
vitaminwater®, smartwater® and vitaminenergy. The distribution
agreement was effective November 1, 2007 for a period of ten years and, unless earlier terminated,
will be automatically renewed for succeeding ten-year terms, subject to a one year non-renewal
notification by the Company. In conjunction with the execution of the distribution agreement, the
Company entered into an agreement with The Coca-Cola Company whereby the Company agreed not to
introduce new third party brands or certain third party brand extensions in the United States
through August 31, 2010 unless mutually agreed to by the Company and The Coca-Cola Company.
The Company has invested in its own brand portfolio with products such as Tum-E
Yummies, a vitamin C enhanced flavored drink, Country Breeze tea and diet Country
Breeze tea and is the exclusive licensee of Cinnabon Premium Coffee Lattes. These brands enable
the Company to participate in strong growth categories and capitalize on distribution channels that
may include the Companys traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory as well as third party
distributors outside the Companys traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory. While the growth
prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed brands appear promising, the cost of developing,
marketing and distributing these brands is anticipated to be significant as well.
Distribution Cost Management
Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from Company locations to
customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to $138.7 million and $152.5 million in YTD
2009 and YTD 2008, respectively. Over the past several years, the Company has focused on converting
its distribution system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This conversion
to a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently handle increasing numbers of
products. In addition, the Company has closed a number of smaller sales distribution centers over
the past several years reducing its fixed warehouse-related costs.
The Company has three primary delivery systems for its current business:
| bulk delivery for large supermarkets, mass merchandisers and club stores; |
||
| advanced sales delivery for convenience stores, drug stores, small supermarkets and
certain on-premise accounts; and |
||
| full service delivery for full service vending customers. |
Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the Company.
Productivity
A key driver in the Companys S,D&A expense management relates to ongoing improvements in labor
productivity and asset productivity. The Company continues to focus on its supply chain and
distribution functions for ongoing opportunities to improve productivity.
41
Table of Contents
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition
The following items affect the comparability of the financial results presented below:
Q3 2009 and YTD 2009 |
|||
| a $1.4 million and $5.3 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of
sales related to the Companys 2010 and 2011 aluminum hedging programs in Q3 2009 and YTD
2009, respectively; |
||
| a $1.7 million credit to income tax expense related to the agreement with a state tax
authority to settle certain prior tax positions in Q1 2009; |
||
| a $5.4 million credit to income tax expense related to the reduction of the liability
for uncertain tax positions in Q3 2009 due mainly to the lapse of applicable statutes of
limitations; |
||
| a $.9 million and $2.9 million pre-tax favorable impact to S,D&A expenses in Q3 2009 and
YTD 2009, respectively, due to a change in the estimate of the useful lives of certain cold
drink dispensing equipment in Q1 2009; |
||
| a $.1 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment and $.9 million pre-tax
favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Companys 2009 fuel
hedging program in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively; |
||
| a $.6 million pre-tax favorable adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the gain on the
termination of a capital lease related to an operating facility in Q1 2009; and |
||
| a $.5 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment and $1.1 million pre-tax
favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Companys 2010 fuel
hedging program in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively. |
Q3 2008 and YTD 2008 |
|||
| a $13.8 million pre-tax charge to freeze the Companys liability to the Central States,
Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (Central States), a multi-employer pension
fund effective in Q3 2008, while preserving the pension benefits previously earned by
Company employees covered by the plan; |
||
| a $4.0 million pre-tax charge for restructuring expense related to the Companys plan
initiated in Q3 2008 to reorganize the structure of its operating units and support
services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions; |
||
| a $2.6 million adjustment to increase equity investment in a plastic bottle cooperative
in YTD 2008; and |
||
| a $.6 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment and $1.2 million pre-tax
favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Companys 2008 fuel hedging
program in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008, respectively. |
42
Table of Contents
The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the Companys financial
results for Q3 2009 and YTD 2009 compared to Q3 2008 and YTD 2008.
Third Quarter | % | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2009 | 2008 | Change | Change | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 374,556 | $ | 381,563 | $ | (7,007 | ) | (1.8 | ) | |||||||
Gross margin |
157,320 | 155,827 | 1,493 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
S,D&A expenses |
131,024 | 149,384 | (18,360 | ) | (12.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from operations |
26,296 | 6,443 | 19,853 | NM* | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
8,866 | 9,406 | (540 | ) | (5.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
17,430 | (2,963 | ) | 20,393 | NM* | |||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1,043 | (523 | ) | 1,566 | NM* | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
16,387 | (2,440 | ) | 18,827 | NM* | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
15,428 | (3,145 | ) | 18,573 | NM* | |||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 2.02 | NM* | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 2.02 | NM* | ||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 1.68 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 2.02 | NM* | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 1.67 | $ | (.34 | ) | $ | 2.01 | NM* |
* | Not Meaningful |
First Nine Months | % | |||||||||||||||
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) | 2009 | 2008 | Change | Change | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,088,566 | $ | 1,115,240 | $ | (26,674 | ) | (2.4 | ) | |||||||
Gross margin |
464,576 | 467,625 | (3,049 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||||
S,D&A expenses |
386,461 | 421,300 | (34,839 | ) | (8.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from operations |
78,115 | 46,325 | 31,790 | 68.6 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
28,059 | 29,789 | (1,730 | ) | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
50,056 | 16,536 | 33,520 | NM* | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
11,928 | 7,135 | 4,793 | 67.2 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
38,128 | 9,401 | 28,727 | NM* | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to the Company |
36,146 | 7,675 | 28,471 | NM* | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 3.94 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 3.10 | NM* | |||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 3.94 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 3.10 | NM* | |||||||||
Diluted net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
$ | 3.93 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 3.09 | NM* | |||||||||
Class B Common Stock |
$ | 3.92 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 3.09 | NM* |
* | Not Meaningful |
The Companys net sales decreased 1.8% in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008. The decrease in net sales
was primarily due to a 1.2% decrease in bottle/can volume and a 1.8% decrease in average sales
price per bottle/can unit. The decrease in bottle/can volume was primarily due to a volume
decrease in bottled water. The decrease in average sales price per bottle/can unit was primarily
due to lower per unit prices in sparkling products except energy products partially offset by
higher per unit prices in energy products. The Companys net sales decreased 2.4% in YTD 2009
compared to YTD 2008. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to a 6.0% decrease in
43
Table of Contents
bottle/can volume partially offset by a 2.3% increase in average sales price per bottle/can unit.
The decrease in bottle/can volume was primarily due to a decrease in volume in all product
categories except energy products. The increase in average sales price per bottle/can unit was
primarily due to increased sales prices in all product categories except enhanced water products.
Gross margin dollars increased 1.0% in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008. The Companys gross margin
percentage increased to 42.0% for Q3 2009 from 40.8% for Q3 2008. The increase in gross margin
dollars and gross margin percentage was primarily due to an increase in marketing funding support
received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company partially offset by lower bottle/can sales price per
unit. Gross margin dollars decreased .7% in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008. The Companys gross
margin percentage increased to 42.7% for YTD 2009 from 41.9% for YTD 2008. The decrease in gross
margin dollars was primarily due to lower bottle/can volume and increases in raw material costs
partially offset by higher average sales price per bottle/can unit. The increase in gross margin
percentage in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008 was primarily due to higher sales prices per unit and a
decrease in cost of sales due to the Companys aluminum hedging program partially offset by higher
raw material costs.
S,D&A expenses decreased 12.3% in Q3 2009 from Q3 2008 and 8.3% in YTD 2009 from YTD 2008. The
decreases in S,D&A expenses in Q3 2009 from Q3 2008 and YTD 2009 from YTD 2008 were primarily
attributable to decreases in salaries and wages, decreases in fuel costs and decreased depreciation
expense offset by increased employee benefit costs and increased bonus expense. During Q3 2008,
the Company recorded a charge that resulted from a new collective bargaining agreement that allowed
the Company to freeze its liability for the union pension plan. During Q3 2008, the Company also
recorded restructuring expense related to the Companys plan to reorganize the structure of its
operating units and support services.
Net interest expense decreased 5.7% in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008 and decreased 5.8% in YTD 2009
compared to YTD 2008. The decrease in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008 was primarily due to lower
debt. The Companys overall weighted average interest rate was 5.7% during both YTD 2009 and YTD
2008.
Net debt and capital lease obligations were summarized as follows:
Sept. 27, | December 28, | Sept. 28, | ||||||||||
In Thousands | 2009 | 2008 | 2008 | |||||||||
Debt |
$ | 552,882 | $ | 591,450 | $ | 591,450 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations |
64,006 | 77,614 | 78,280 | |||||||||
Total debt and capital lease obligations |
616,888 | 669,064 | 669,730 | |||||||||
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
25,062 | 45,407 | 20,583 | |||||||||
Total net debt and capital lease obligations (1) |
$ | 591,826 | $ | 623,657 | $ | 649,147 | ||||||
(1) | The non-GAAP measure Total net debt and capital lease obligations is used to
provide investors with additional information which management believes is helpful in the
evaluation of the Companys capital structure and financial leverage. |
44
Table of Contents
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements
Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under
different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 28, 2008 a discussion of the Companys most critical accounting policies,
which are those most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results of
operations and require managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
The Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during YTD 2009. Any changes
in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is made.
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued new guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The new guidance does not require any new fair value
measurements but could change the Companys current practices in measuring fair value.
The new guidance was effective at the beginning of the first quarter of 2008 for all financial
assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a recurring basis. In February 2008, the FASB issued additional guidance which deferred
the application date of the provisions of new guidance for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities
until Q1 2009 except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements as of YTD 2009, but could have a material
effect in the future. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance which established principles and requirements for
recognizing and measuring identifiable assets and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in an acquisition, at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The
new guidance was effective for Q1 2009. The impact on the Company of adopting this new guidance
will depend on the nature, terms and size of business combinations completed after the effective
date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance to establish new accounting and new reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (commonly referred to previously as
minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This new guidance was effective
for the Company as of the beginning of Q1 2009 and is being applied prospectively, except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively. The adoption of
this new guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which amends and expands the disclosure requirements
relative to derivative instruments to provide an enhanced understanding of why an entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and
how they affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The new
guidance was effective for Q1 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not impact the Companys
consolidated financial statements
45
Table of Contents
other than expanded footnote disclosures related to derivative instruments and related hedged
items. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In April 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which amends the factors to be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of intangible assets. The
intent of the new guidance is to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible
asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure its fair value. The new guidance was
effective for Q1 2009. The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on
the accounting for future acquisitions or renewals of intangible assets, but the potential impact
is dependent upon the acquisitions or renewals of intangible assets in the future.
In September 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which requires a seller of credit derivatives to
provide certain disclosures for each credit derivative (or group of similar credit derivatives).
The new guidance also requires guarantors to disclose the current status of payment/performance
risk of guarantees and clarifies the effective date of the new guidance relative to derivative
instruments discussed above. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or
liability when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly. The new guidance was effective
for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which amends the other-than-temporary impairment
guidance for debt securities to make the other-than-temporary impairment guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and
equity securities. The new guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June
15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which requires disclosures about the fair value of
financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in
annual financial statements. The new guidance was effective for interim periods ending after June
15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relative to subsequent events which does not result in
significant changes in the subsequent events that an entity reports in its financial statements.
The new guidance requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the
financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The new guidance was effective
for the Company in the second quarter of 2009, and the required disclosure has been included in
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) became the source of
authoritative United States GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.
The Codification did not change GAAP. The Codification was effective for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. Pursuant to the provision of the Codification, the
Company updated references to GAAP in the Companys consolidated financial statements. The
Codification did not change GAAP and therefore did not impact the Companys consolidated financial
statements other than the change in references.
46
Table of Contents
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which requires enhanced disclosures about plan
assets of a companys defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The enhanced
disclosures are intended to provide users of financial statements with a greater understanding of
(1) employers investment strategies; (2) major categories of plan assets; (3) the inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan assets for the
period; and (5) concentration of risk within plan assets. The new guidance is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance will not impact
the Companys consolidated financial statements other than expanded footnote disclosures related
to the Companys pension plan assets.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which eliminates the exceptions for qualifying
special-purpose entities from consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale
accounting for certain mortgage securitization when a transferor has not surrendered control over
the transferred financial assets. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods that
begin after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which replaced the quantitative-based risks and rewards
calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity (VIE) with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the
power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the entitys economic
performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity.
The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods that begin after November 15, 2009. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, FASB issued new guidance on measuring the fair value of liabilities. The new
guidance clarifies that the quoted price for the identical liability, when traded as an asset in an
active market, is a Level 1 measurement for that liability when no adjustment to the quoted price
is required. The new guidance also gives guidance on valuation techniques in the absence of a
Level 1 measurement. The new guidance is effective for the Company in the fourth quarter of 2009.
The Company does not expect this new guidance to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Q3 2009 Compared to Q3 2008 and YTD 2009 Compared to YTD 2008
Net Sales
Net sales decreased $7.0 million, or 1.8%, to $374.6 million in Q3 2009 compared to $381.6 million
in Q3 2008. Net sales decreased $26.7 million, or 2.4% to $1,088.6 million in YTD 2009 compared
to $1,115.2 million in YTD 2008.
47
Table of Contents
The decrease in net sales was a result of the following:
Q3 2009 | Attributable to: |
||||||
(In Millions) | |||||||
$ | (5.2 | ) | 1.2% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume decrease in bottled water |
||||
(2.1 | ) | 1.8% decrease in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to lower per unit
prices in sparkling products except energy products partially offset by higher per unit
prices in energy products |
|||||
1.0 | 3.2% increase in sales volume sold to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an
increase in volume of sparkling products |
||||||
(1.4 | ) | 7.0% decrease in post-mix volume |
|||||
1.1 | 6.2% increase in post-mix sales price per unit |
||||||
(0.4 | ) | Other |
|||||
$ | (7.0 | ) | Total decrease in net sales |
||||
YTD 2009 | Attributable to: |
|||
(In Millions) | ||||
$ | (55.0 | ) | 6.0% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume
decrease in all product categories except energy products |
|
22.4 | 2.3% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to higher per unit
prices in all product categories except enhanced water products |
|||
(4.8 | ) | 8.4% decrease in post-mix volume |
||
4.0 | 4.3% increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily
due to increases in all product categories |
|||
3.4 | 6.5% increase in post-mix sales price per unit |
|||
3.3 | Other |
|||
$ | (26.7 | ) | Total decrease in net sales |
|
In YTD 2009, the Companys bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for 84% of the Companys
total net sales. Bottle/can net pricing is based on the invoice price charged to customers reduced
by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is impacted by the price charged per
package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in which those packages are sold.
The decrease in the Companys bottle/can net pricing per unit in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008 was
primarily due to sales price decreases in sparkling products except energy products partially
offset by sales price increases in energy products. The increase in the Companys bottle/can net
pricing per unit in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008 was primarily due to sales price increases in all
product categories, except enhanced water products.
Product category sales volume in Q3 2009 and Q3 2008 and YTD 2009 and YTD 2008 as a percentage of
total bottle/can sales volume and the percentage change by product category was as follows:
Bottle/Can Sales Volume | Bottle/Can Sales Volume | |||||||||||
Product Category |
Q3 2009 | Q3 2008 | % Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including
energy products) |
84.6 | % | 82.7 | % | 1.2 | |||||||
Still beverages |
15.4 | % | 17.3 | % | (12.1 | ) | ||||||
Total bottle/can sales volume |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | (1.2 | ) | ||||||
48
Table of Contents
Bottle/Can Sales Volume | Bottle/Can Sales Volume | |||||||||||
Product Category |
YTD 2009 | YTD 2008 | % (Decrease) | |||||||||
Sparkling beverages (including
energy products) |
85.0 | % | 84.5 | % | (4.3 | ) | ||||||
Still beverages |
15.0 | % | 15.5 | % | (14.7 | ) | ||||||
Total bottle/can sales volume |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | (6.0 | ) | ||||||
The Companys products are sold and distributed through various channels. These channels include
selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts
and vending machine outlets. During YTD 2009, approximately 68% of the Companys bottle/can volume
was sold for future consumption. The remaining bottle/can volume of approximately 32% was sold for
immediate consumption. The Companys largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for
approximately 19% of the Companys total bottle/can volume during YTD 2009. The Companys second
largest customer, Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 11% of the Companys total bottle/can
volume in YTD 2009. All of the Companys beverage sales are to customers in the United States.
The Company recorded delivery fees in net sales of $5.9 million and $4.7 million in YTD 2009 and
YTD 2008, respectively. These fees are used to offset a portion of the Companys delivery and
handling costs.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing
overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs and shipping and handling
costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution
centers.
Cost of sales decreased 3.8%, or $8.5 million, to $217.2 million in Q3 2009 compared to $225.7
million in Q3 2008. Cost of sales decreased 3.6%, or $23.6 million, to $624.0 million in YTD
2009 compared to $647.6 million in YTD 2008.
The decrease in cost of sales was principally attributable to the following:
Q3 2009 | Attributable to: |
|||
(In Millions) | ||||
$ | (3.9 | ) | Increase in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
|
(3.7 | ) | 1.2% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume decrease in bottled water |
||
(1.4 | ) | Decrease in cost due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
||
1.0 | 3.2% increase in sales volume sold to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an
increase in volume of sparkling products |
|||
(1.0 | ) | 7.0% decrease in post-mix volume |
||
0.9 | Increase in raw material costs primarily due to increases in high fructose corn syrup |
|||
(0.4 | ) | Other |
||
$ | (8.5 | ) | Total decrease in cost of sales |
|
49
Table of Contents
YTD 2009 | Attributable to: |
|||
(In Millions) | ||||
$ | (31.7 | ) | 6.0% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume decrease in all product categories except energy
products |
|
12.8 | Increase in raw material costs such as concentrate and high fructose corn syrup partially
offset by a decrease in purchased products |
|||
(5.3 | ) | Decrease in cost due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
||
(3.2 | ) | 8.4% decrease in post-mix volume |
||
2.6 | Increase in equity investment in a plastic bottle cooperative in 2008 |
|||
1.0 | Decrease in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
|||
0.2 | Other |
|||
$ | (23.6 | ) | Total decrease in cost of sales |
|
The Company relies extensively on advertising and sales promotion in the marketing of its products.
The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies that supply concentrates, syrups and finished
products to the Company make substantial marketing and advertising expenditures to promote sales in
the local territories served by the Company. The Company also benefits from national advertising
programs conducted by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies. Certain of the marketing
expenditures by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies are made pursuant to annual
arrangements. Although The Coca-Cola Company has advised the Company that it intends to continue
to provide marketing funding support, it is not obligated to do so under the Companys beverage
agreements. Significant decreases in marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company or other
beverage companies could adversely impact operating results of the Company in the future.
Total marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, which
includes direct payments to the Company and payments to customers for marketing programs, was $41.1
million for YTD 2009 compared to $42.1 million for YTD 2008.
The net impact of the Companys aluminum hedging program was to decrease aluminum cost by $1.4
million and $5.3 million in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively.
Gross Margin
Gross margin dollars increased 1.0%, or $1.5 million, to $157.3 million in Q3 2009 compared to
$155.8 million in Q3 2008. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 42.0% for Q3
2009 from 40.8% for Q3 2008. Gross margin dollars decreased $3.0 million, or .7%, to $464.6 million
in YTD 2009 compared to $467.6 million in YTD 2008. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales
increased to 42.7% in YTD 2009 from 41.9% in YTD 2008.
50
Table of Contents
The increase (decrease) in gross margin dollars was primarily the result of the following:
Q3 2009 | Attributable to: |
|||
(In Millions) | ||||
$ | 3.9 | Increase in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
||
(2.1 | ) | 1.8% decrease in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to lower per unit prices
in sparkling products except energy products partially offset by higher per unit prices in
energy products |
||
(1.5 | ) | 1.2% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume decrease in bottled water |
||
1.4 | Increase in gross margin due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|||
1.1 | 6.2% increase in post-mix sales price per unit |
|||
(0.9 | ) | Increase in raw material costs primarily due to increases in high fructose corn syrup |
||
(0.4 | ) | 7.0% decrease in post-mix volume |
||
| Other |
|||
$ | 1.5 | Total increase in gross margin |
||
YTD 2009 | Attributable to: |
|||
(In Millions) | ||||
$ | (23.3 | ) | 6.0% decrease in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume decrease in all product categories except energy
products |
|
22.4 | 2.3% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to higher per unit prices in
all product categories except enhanced water products |
|||
(12.8 | ) | Increase in raw material costs such as concentrate and high fructose corn syrup partially
offset by a decrease in purchased products |
||
5.3 | Increase in gross margin due to the Companys aluminum hedging program |
|||
4.0 | 4.3% increase in sales price per unit for sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily
due to increases in all product categories |
|||
3.4 | 6.5% increase in post-mix sales price per unit |
|||
(2.6 | ) | Increase in equity investment in a plastic bottle cooperative in 2008 |
||
(1.0 | ) | Decrease in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company |
||
(1.6 | ) | 8.4% decrease in post-mix volume |
||
3.2 | Other |
|||
$ | (3.0 | ) | Total decrease in gross margin |
|
The increase in gross margin percentage in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008 was primarily due to an
increase in marketing funding support partially offset by lower bottle/can sales prices per unit.
The increase in gross margin percentage in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008 was primarily due to
higher sales prices per unit and a decrease in cost of sales due to the Companys aluminum hedging
program partially offset by higher raw material costs.
The Companys gross margins may not be comparable to other companies, since some entities include
all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales. The Company includes a portion
of these costs in S,D&A expenses.
S,D&A Expenses
S,D&A expenses include the following: sales management labor costs, distribution costs from sales
distribution centers to customer locations, sales distribution center warehouse costs,
depreciation expense related to sales centers, delivery vehicles and cold drink equipment,
point-of-sale expenses, advertising expenses, cold drink equipment repair costs, amortization of
intangibles and administrative support labor and operating costs such as
51
Table of Contents
treasury, legal,
information services, accounting, internal control services, human resources and executive
management costs.
S,D&A expenses decreased by $18.4 million, or 12.3%, to $131.0 million in Q3 2009 from $149.4
million in Q3 2008. S,D&A expenses decreased by $34.8 million, or 8.3%, to $386.5 million in YTD
2009 from $421.3 million in YTD 2008.
The decrease in S,D&A expenses was primarily due to the following:
Q3 2009 | Attributable to: |
|||
(In Millions) | ||||
$ | (13.8 | ) | Charge to exit from multi-employer pension plan in Q3 2008 |
|
4.0 | Increase in employee benefit costs primarily due to higher pension plan costs |
|||
(4.0 | ) | Decrease in restructuring costs |
||
(3.4 | ) | Decrease in fuel and other energy costs related to the movement of finished goods from
sales distribution centers to customer locations |
||
2.8 | Increase in accrued bonus and incentive expense due to the Companys financial
performance |
|||
(2.3 | ) | Decrease in property and casualty insurance expenses |
||
(1.7 | ) | Decrease in depreciation expense due to a change in estimate of the useful lives of
certain cold drink dispensing equipment in 2009 and lower levels of capital spending |
||
(1.1 | ) | Decrease in employee salaries due to the Company implementing its July 2008 plan to
reorganize the structure of its operating units and support services and eliminate
approximately 350 positions |
||
0.9 | Increase in bad debt expense |
|||
0.2 | Other |
|||
$ | (18.4 | ) | Total decrease in S,D&A expenses |
|
YTD 2009 | Attributable to: |
|||
(In Millions) | ||||
$ | (13.8 | ) | Charge to exit from multi-employer pension plan in Q3 2008 |
|
(12.0 | ) | Decrease in employee salaries due to the Company implementing its July 2008 plan to
reorganize the structure of its operating units and support services and eliminate
approximately 350 positions |
||
(10.8 | ) | Decrease in fuel and other energy costs related to the movement of finished goods from
sales distribution centers to customer locations |
||
9.5 | Increase in employee benefit costs primarily due to higher pension plan costs |
|||
5.5 | Increase in accrued bonus and incentive expense and stock performance expense due to
the Companys financial performance |
|||
(5.4 | ) | Decrease in depreciation expense due to a change in estimate of the useful lives of
certain cold drink dispensing equipment in Q1 2009 and lower levels of capital spending |
||
(4.0 | ) | Decrease in restructuring costs |
||
1.5 | Increase in bad debt expense |
|||
(1.5 | ) | Decrease in property and casualty insurance expenses |
||
(1.3 | ) | Decrease in marketing expenses |
||
(2.5 | ) | Other |
||
$ | (34.8 | ) | Total decrease in S,D&A expenses |
|
Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations
to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related
to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are
included in S,D&A expenses and totaled $138.7 million and $152.5 million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008,
respectively.
52
Table of Contents
The net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program was to decrease fuel costs by $2.0
million and $1.2 million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively.
Primarily due to the performance of the Companys pension plan investments during 2008, the pension
expense recorded in S,D&A expenses related to the two Company-sponsored pension plans increased by
$3.0 million from a $.5 million credit in Q3 2008 to a $2.5 million expense in Q3 2009 and by $8.9
million from a $1.5 million credit in YTD 2008 to a $7.4 million expense in YTD 2009.
On July 15, 2008, the Company initiated a plan to reorganize the structure of its operating units
and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions, or
approximately 5% of its workforce. As a result of this plan, the Company incurred $4.6 million in
restructuring expenses in the second half of 2008 for one-time termination benefits. The plan was
completed in 2008 and the majority of cash expenditures occurred in 2008.
The Company entered into a new agreement with a collective bargaining unit in Q3 2008. The
collective bargaining unit represents approximately 270 employees, or approximately 4% of the
Companys total workforce. The new agreement allows the Company to freeze its liability to the
Central States, a multi-employer pension fund, while preserving the
pension benefits previously earned by the employees. As a result of the new agreement, the Company
recorded a charge of $13.6 million in the second half of 2008. The Company paid $3.0 million in
2008 to the Southern States Savings and Retirement Plan (Southern States) under this agreement.
The remaining $10.6 million was the present value amount, using a discount rate of 7%, which will
be paid under the agreement and was recorded in other liabilities. The Company will pay
approximately $1 million annually over the next 20 years to Central States. The Company will also
make future contributions on behalf of these employees to Southern States, a multi-employer defined
contribution plan. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $.4 million in expense to
settle a strike by union employees covered by this plan.
The Company suspended matching contributions to its 401(k) Savings Plan effective April 1, 2009.
The Company maintains the option to match its employees 401(k) Savings Plan contributions based on
the financial results for 2009. In Q3 2009, the Company decided to match its employees
contributions for the period of April 1, 2009 through August 31, 2009. The Company accrued for a
payment of $3.6 million to the 401(k) Savings Plan for the five month period. This payment was
made in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense decreased 5.7%, or $0.5 million, in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008 and decreased
5.8%, or $1.7 million, in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008. The decrease in interest expense in YTD 2009 was
primarily due to lower debt. The Companys overall weighted average interest rate was 5.7% during
both YTD 2009 and YTD 2008. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources Hedging Activities
Interest Rate Hedging section of M,D&A for additional information.
53
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
The Companys effective income tax rate for YTD 2009 was 24.8% compared to 48.2% for YTD 2008. The
lower effective tax rate for YTD 2009 resulted primarily from a decrease in the Companys reserve
for uncertain tax positions. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information. The Companys income tax rate for the remainder of 2009 is dependent upon the results
of operations and may change if the results in 2009 are different from current expectations.
The Companys income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based
on the Companys ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that
becomes available to the Company.
Noncontrolling Interest
The Company recorded net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest of $1.0 million in Q3 2009 compared to $.7 million in Q3 2008 and $2.0 million in YTD
2009 compared to $1.7 million in YTD 2008 related to the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola
Company.
Financial Condition
Total assets of $1.3 billion at September 27, 2009 did not materially change from December 28, 2008
primarily due to decreases in cash and cash equivalents; property, plant and equipment, net and
leased property under capital leases, net offset by increases in accounts receivable, prepaid
expenses and other current assets and other assets. Property, plant and equipment, net decreased
primarily due to lower levels of capital spending over the past several years. Leased property
under capital leases, net decreased primarily due to the termination of one lease and the
modification of a second lease. Other assets increased primarily due to unamortized cost and
mark-to-market adjustments related to the Companys hedging programs.
Net working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, increased by $171.4
million from a net liability to positive working capital of $73.6 million at September 27, 2009 from December 28, 2008 and increased by $187.5
million at September 27, 2009 from September 28, 2008.
Significant changes in net working capital from December 28, 2008 were as follows:
| A decrease in current portion of long-term debt of $176.7 million primarily due to the
payment of $119.3 million of debentures on May 1, 2009 and
the payment of $57.4 million of debentures on July 1, 2009
primarily from $55.0 million in borrowings on the Companys $200 million revolving credit
facility ($200 million facility) which is not due
until March 2012. In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due 2019. |
|
| An increase in other accrued liabilities of $6.7 million primarily due to an increase in
employee benefit plan accruals and accrued income taxes. |
|
| A decrease in accounts payable, trade of $9.8 million primarily due to the timing of
payments. |
|
| An increase in accounts receivable from and an increase in accounts payable to The
Coca-Cola Company of $14.0 million and $8.3 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing
of payments. |
|
| A decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $20.3 million primarily due to the net reduction
of debt of $38.6 million. |
|
| An increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $4.3 million primarily due to
transactions related to the Companys hedging programs. |
54
Table of Contents
Significant changes in net working capital from September 28, 2008 were as follows:
| A decrease in current portion of long-term debt of $176.7 million primarily due to the
payment of $119.3 million of debentures on May 1, 2009 and
the payment of $57.4 million of
debentures on July 1, 2009 primarily from $55.0 million in borrowings on the Companys $200 million facility which is not
due until March 2012. In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due 2019. |
|
| An increase in cash and cash equivalents of $4.5 million primarily due to cash flow from
operations. |
|
| A decrease in accounts receivable, trade, net of $9.3 million primarily due to decreased
sales. |
|
| An increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $6.1 million primarily due to
transactions related to the Companys hedging programs. |
|
| An increase in accounts receivable from and an increase in accounts payable to The
Coca-Cola Company of $4.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing
of payments. |
|
| An increase in accrued compensation payable of $5.6 million primarily due to increased
bonus and incentive accruals. |
Debt and capital lease obligations were $616.9 million as of September 27, 2009 compared to $669.1
million as of December 28, 2008 and $669.7 million as of September 28, 2008. Debt and capital
lease obligations as of September 27, 2009 included $64.0 million of capital lease obligations
related primarily to Company facilities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Resources
The Companys sources of capital include cash flows from operations, available credit facilities
and the issuance of debt and equity securities. Management believes the Company has sufficient
resources available to finance its business plan, meet its working capital requirements and
maintain an appropriate level of capital spending. The amount and frequency of future dividends
will be determined by the Companys Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial
condition of the Company at such time, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be
declared in the future.
As of September 27, 2009, the Company had $170 million available under its $200 million facility to
meet its cash requirements. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a fixed
charges coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as defined in the credit
agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a consolidated cash
flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The operating cash flow ratio requires the
Company to maintain a debt to operating cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or lower. The Company is
currently in compliance with these covenants and has been throughout 2009.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of unsecured 7% Senior Notes due 2019.
The Company had debt maturities of $119.3 million in May 2009 and $57.4 million in July 2009. On
May 1, 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the $110 million 7% Senior Notes due 2019 plus cash
on hand to repay the debt maturity of $119.3 million. The Company used cash flow generated from
operations and $55.0 million in borrowings under its $200 million facility to repay the $57.4
million debt maturity on July 1, 2009. The Company currently believes that all of the banks
participating in the Companys $200 million facility have the ability to and will meet any funding
requests from the Company.
The Company has obtained the majority of its long-term financing, other than capital leases, from
public markets. As of September 27, 2009, $522.9 million of the Companys total outstanding balance
of debt and capital lease obligations of $616.9 million was financed through publicly offered debt.
The Company had capital lease
55
Table of Contents
obligations of $64.0 million as of September 27, 2009. There was $30.0 million outstanding on the
$200 million facility as of September 27, 2009.
Cash Sources and Uses
The primary sources of cash for the Company have been cash provided by operating activities,
investing activities and financing activities. The primary uses of cash have been for capital
expenditures, the payment of debt and capital lease obligations, dividend payments, income tax
payments and pension payments.
A summary of activity for YTD 2009 and YTD 2008 follows:
First Nine Months | ||||||||
In Millions | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Cash Sources |
||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities (excluding income tax and pension payments) |
$ | 82.2 | $ | 66.8 | ||||
Proceeds from $200 million facility |
30.0 | | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
108.1 | | ||||||
Proceeds from termination of interest rate swap agreements |
| 5.1 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
4.9 | 1.2 | ||||||
Total cash sources |
$ | 225.2 | $ | 73.1 | ||||
Cash Uses |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 29.8 | $ | 41.2 | ||||
Investment in a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative |
| 1.0 | ||||||
Investment in restricted cash |
4.5 | | ||||||
Payment of lines of credit, net |
| 7.4 | ||||||
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations |
179.1 | 1.9 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
1.0 | | ||||||
Dividends |
6.9 | 6.9 | ||||||
Income tax payments |
13.8 | 3.7 | ||||||
Pension payments |
10.1 | .2 | ||||||
Other |
.3 | .1 | ||||||
Total cash uses |
$ | 245.5 | $ | 62.4 | ||||
Increase (decrease) in cash |
$ | (20.3 | ) | $ | 10.7 | |||
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment during YTD 2009 were $29.8 million compared to $41.2
million during YTD 2008. Capital expenditures during YTD 2009 were funded with cash flows from
operations. The Company anticipates total additions to property, plant and equipment in fiscal
year 2009 will be in the range of $50 million to $60 million. Leasing is used for certain capital
additions when considered cost effective relative to other sources of capital. The Company
currently leases its corporate headquarters, two production facilities and several sales
distribution facilities and administrative facilities.
Financing Activities
On March 8, 2007, the Company entered into a $200 million facility replacing its $100 million
credit facility. The $200 million facility matures in March 2012 and includes an option to extend
the term for an additional year at the discretion of the participating banks. The $200 million
facility bears interest at a floating base rate or a
floating rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread of .35%, dependent on the length of the term
of the borrowing. In
56
Table of Contents
addition, the Company must pay an annual facility fee of .10% of the lenders
aggregate commitments under the facility. Both the interest rate spread and the facility fee are
determined from a commonly-used pricing grid based on the Companys long-term senior unsecured
debt rating. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a fixed charges
coverage ratio and a debt to operating cash flow ratio, each as defined in the credit agreement.
The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a consolidated cash flow to
fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1 or higher. The operating cash flow ratio requires the Company to
maintain a debt to operating cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1 or lower. On August 25, 2008, the
Company entered into an amendment to the $200 million facility. The amendment clarified that
charges incurred by the Company resulting from the Companys withdrawal from Central States would
be excluded from the calculations of the financial covenants to the extent they were incurred on
or before March 31, 2009 and did not exceed $15 million. See Note 18 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional details on the withdrawal from Central States. The Company is
currently in compliance with these covenants as amended by the amendment to the $200 million
facility. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will,
restrict its liquidity or capital resources. On July 1, 2009 the Company borrowed $55.0 million
under the $200 million facility and used the proceeds, along with $2.4 million of cash on hand, to
repay at maturity the Companys $57.4 million outstanding 7.20% Debentures due 2009. On September
27, 2009, the Company had $30.0 million outstanding under the $200 million facility. There were
no amounts outstanding under the $200 million facility at December 28, 2008 and September 28,
2008.
The Company borrowed periodically under an uncommitted line of credit provided by a bank
participating in the $200 million facility. This uncommitted line of credit made available at the
discretion of the participating bank was temporarily terminated in the fourth quarter of 2008. In
January 2009, the participating bank reinstated its uncommitted line of credit for $65 million.
This uncommitted line of credit was terminated on March 29, 2009.
In April 2009, the Company issued $110 million of 7% Senior Notes due 2019. The proceeds plus cash
on hand were used on May 1, 2009 to repay at maturity the $119.3 million outstanding 6.375%
Debentures due 2009.
All of the outstanding debt has been issued by the Company with none having been issued by any of
the Companys subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Companys debt. The Company or its
subsidiaries have entered into four capital leases.
At September 27, 2009, the Companys credit ratings were as follows:
Long-Term Debt | ||||
Standard & Poors |
BBB | |||
Moodys |
Baa2 |
The Companys credit ratings are reviewed periodically by the respective rating agencies. Changes
in the Companys operating results or financial position could result in changes in the Companys
credit ratings. Lower credit ratings could result in higher borrowing costs for the Company or
reduced access to capital markets, which could have a material impact on the Companys financial
position or results of operations. There were no changes in these credit ratings from the prior
year and the credit ratings are currently stable.
The Companys public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of
certain liens and encumbrances as well as indebtedness by the Companys subsidiaries in excess of
certain amounts.
57
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is a member of two manufacturing cooperatives and has guaranteed $38.4 million of debt
and related lease obligations for these entities as of September 27, 2009. In addition, the
Company has an equity ownership interest in each of the entities. The members of both
cooperatives consist solely of Coca-Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of
these cooperatives will fail to fulfill their commitments. The Company further believes each of
these cooperatives has sufficient assets, including production equipment, facilities and working
capital, and the ability to adjust selling prices of their products to adequately mitigate the
risk of material loss from the Companys guarantees. As of September 27, 2009, the Companys
maximum exposure, if the entities borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, would have been $69.3
million including the Companys equity interests. See Note 14 and Note 19 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information about these entities.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments as
of September 27, 2009:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Oct. 2009- | Oct. 2010- | Oct. 2012- | After | |||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | Total | Sept. 2010 | Sept. 2012 | Sept. 2014 | Sept. 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt, net of interest |
$ | 552,882 | $ | | $ | 30,000 | $ | 150,000 | $ | 372,882 | ||||||||||
Capital lease obligations,
net of interest |
64,006 | 3,759 | 7,926 | 9,004 | 43,317 | |||||||||||||||
Estimated interest on
long-term debt and capital
lease obligations (1) |
212,617 | 32,850 | 65,448 | 50,343 | 63,976 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (2) |
437,057 | 93,655 | 187,310 | 156,092 | | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities (3) |
106,901 | 7,357 | 14,647 | 13,449 | 71,448 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
20,543 | 3,740 | 5,539 | 3,139 | 8,125 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term contractual
arrangements (4) |
22,539 | 6,818 | 10,345 | 4,962 | 414 | |||||||||||||||
Postretirement obligations |
37,138 | 1,891 | 4,811 | 5,200 | 25,236 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase orders (5) |
32,746 | 32,746 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 1,486,429 | $ | 182,816 | $ | 326,026 | $ | 392,189 | $ | 585,398 | ||||||||||
(1) | Includes interest payments based on contractual terms and current interest
rates for variable rate debt. |
|
(2) | Represents an estimate of the Companys obligation to purchase 17.5 million cases
of finished product on an annual basis through May 2014 from South Atlantic Canners, a
manufacturing cooperative. |
|
(3) | Includes obligations under executive benefit plans, unrecognized income tax
benefits, the liability to exit from a multi-employer pension plan and other long-term
liabilities. |
|
(4) | Includes contractual arrangements with certain prestige properties, athletics
venues and other locations, and other long-term marketing commitments. |
|
(5) | Purchase orders include commitments in which a written purchase order has been
issued to a vendor, but the goods have not been received or the services have not been
performed. |
The Company has $3.0 million of unrecognized income tax benefits including accrued interest
as of September 27, 2009 (included in other long-term liabilities in the table above) of which all
would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. It is expected that the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits may change in the next 12 months; however, the Company does not expect
the change to have a significant impact on the
consolidated financial statements. See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
58
Table of Contents
The Company is a member of Southeastern Container, a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative,
from which the Company is obligated to purchase at least 80% of its requirements of plastic
bottles for certain designated territories. This obligation is not included in the Companys
table of contractual obligations and commercial commitments since there are no minimum purchase
requirements.
As of September 27, 2009, the Company has $25.6 million of standby letters of credit, primarily
related to its property and casualty insurance programs. See Note 14 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information related to commercial commitments, guarantees,
legal and tax matters.
The Company contributed $10.1 million to its two Company-sponsored pension plans in YTD 2009 and
does not anticipate making any additional contribution for the remainder of 2009. Postretirement
medical care payments are expected to be approximately $2.3 million in 2009. See Note 18 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information related to pension and postretirement
obligations.
Hedging Activities
Interest Rate Hedging
The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to mitigate risk from interest rate
fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon
anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Companys debt level and the potential
impact of changes in interest rates on the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity
analyses are performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of
various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments.
In September 2008, the Company terminated six interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount
of $225 million it had outstanding. The Company received $6.2 million in cash proceeds including
$1.1 million for previously accrued interest receivable. After accounting for the previously
accrued interest receivable, the Company is amortizing a gain of $5.1 million over the remaining
term of the underlying debt. The Company has no interest rate swap agreements outstanding as of
September 27, 2009.
Interest expense was reduced due to the amortization of deferred gains on previously terminated
interest rate swap agreements and forward interest rate agreements by $1.8 million and $1.3 million
during YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively.
The weighted average interest rate of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations after taking
into account all of the interest rate hedging activities was 5.5% as of September 27, 2009 compared
to 5.9% as of December 28, 2008 and 5.9% as of September 28, 2008. Approximately 9.6% of the
Companys debt and capital lease obligations of $616.9 million as of September 27, 2009 was
maintained on a floating rate basis and was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
Fuel Hedging
The Company uses derivative instruments to hedge all of the Companys projected diesel fuel
purchases for 2009 and 2010. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the
Companys delivery fleet. The Company
pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the corresponding period of the
instrument. The Company accounts for its fuel hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or
income being reflected as an adjustment of fuel costs.
59
Table of Contents
In October 2008, the Company entered into derivative agreements to hedge all of its projected
diesel fuel purchases for 2009 establishing an upper and lower limit on the Companys price of
diesel fuel.
In February 2009, the Company entered into derivative agreements to hedge all of its projected
diesel fuel purchases for 2010 establishing an upper limit on the Companys price of diesel fuel.
The net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program was to increase fuel costs by $.6 million in
both Q3 2009 and Q3 2008. The net impact of the Companys fuel hedging program was to decrease
fuel costs by $2.0 million and $1.2 million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively.
Aluminum Hedging
At the end of Q1 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments to hedge 75% of the Companys
projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which
is amortized over the corresponding period of the instruments. The Company accounts for its
aluminum hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an
adjustment to cost of sales.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company entered into derivative agreements to hedge 75% of the Companys
projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements.
The net impact of the Companys aluminum hedging program was to decrease cost of sales by $1.4
million and $5.3 million in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively.
60
Table of Contents
Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as information included in future filings by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material,
press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain,
forward-looking management comments and other statements that reflect managements current outlook
for future periods. These statements include, among others, statements relating to:
| the Companys belief that the covenants on its $200 million facility will not restrict
its liquidity or capital resources; |
||
| the Companys belief that other parties to certain contractual arrangements will perform
their obligations; |
||
| potential marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage
companies; |
||
| the Companys belief that disposition of certain claims and legal proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, cash flows or results of
operations and that no material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is reasonably
possible; |
||
| managements belief that the Company has adequately provided for any ultimate amounts
that are likely to result from tax audits; |
||
| managements belief that the Company has sufficient resources available to finance its
business plan, meet its working capital requirements and maintain an appropriate level of
capital spending; |
||
| the Companys belief that the cooperatives whose debt and lease obligations the Company
guarantees have sufficient assets and the ability to adjust selling prices of their
products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss and that the cooperatives will
perform their obligations under their debt and lease agreements; |
||
| the Companys key priorities which are revenue management, product innovation and
beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity; |
||
| the Companys hypothetical calculation of the impact of a 1% increase in interest rates
on outstanding floating rate debt and capital lease obligations for the next twelve months
as of September 27, 2009; |
||
| the Companys anticipation that it will not contribute additional payments to the two
Company-sponsored pension plans for the remainder of 2009; |
||
| the Companys belief that postretirement medical care payments are expected to be
approximately $2.3 million in 2009; |
||
| the Companys expectation that additions to property, plant and equipment in 2009 will
be in the range of $50 million to $60 million; |
||
| the Companys beliefs and estimates regarding the impact of the adoption of certain new
accounting guidance; |
||
| the Companys belief that the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed
brands appear promising and the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands
may be significant; |
||
| the Companys expectation that unrecognized tax benefits may change over the next 12
months as a result of tax audits but will not have a significant impact on the
consolidated financial statements; |
||
| the Companys belief that all of the banks participating in the Companys $200 million
facility have the ability to and will meet any funding requests from the Company; |
||
| the Companys belief that it is competitive in its territories with respect to the
principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry;
|
||
| the Companys estimate that a 10% increase in the market price of certain commodities
over the current market prices would cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months
by approximately $29 million assuming no change in volume; and |
61
Table of Contents
| the Companys belief that innovation of new brands and packages will continue to be
critical to the Companys overall revenue. |
These statements and expectations are based on currently available competitive, financial and
economic data along with the Companys operating plans, and are subject to future events and
uncertainties that could cause anticipated events not to occur or actual results to differ
materially from historical or anticipated results. Factors that could impact those differences or
adversely affect future periods include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in Part II,
Item 1A. of this Form 10-Q and in Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 28, 2008.
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on the Companys forward-looking statements,
which reflect the expectations of management of the Company only as of the time such statements are
made. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
62
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The Company is exposed to certain market risks that arise in the ordinary course of business. The
Company may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market
risk. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading
purposes. A discussion of the Companys primary market risk exposure and interest rate risk is
presented below.
Debt and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its fixed and floating rate debt. The Company
periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate fluctuations.
The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon anticipated cash flows
from operations relative to the Companys overall financial condition. Sensitivity analyses are
performed to review the impact on the Companys financial position and coverage of various interest
rate movements. The counterparties to these interest rate hedging arrangements were major
financial institutions with which the Company also has other financial relationships. The Company
did not have any interest rate hedging products as of September 27, 2009. The Company generally
maintains between 40% and 60% of total borrowings at variable interest rates after taking into
account all of the interest rate hedging activities. While this is the target range for the
percentage of total borrowings at variable interest rates, the financial position of the Company
and market conditions may result in strategies outside of this range at certain points in time.
Approximately 9.6% of the Companys debt and capital lease obligations of $616.9 million as of
September 27, 2009 was subject to changes in short-term interest rates.
As it relates to the Companys variable rate debt and variable rate leases, assuming no changes in
the Companys financial structure, if market interest rates average 1% more over the next twelve
months than the interest rates as of September 27, 2009, interest expense for the following twelve
months would increase by approximately $.6 million. This amount was determined by calculating the
effect of the hypothetical interest rate on the Companys variable rate debt and variable rate
leases. This calculated, hypothetical increase in interest expense for the following twelve months
may be different from the actual increase in interest expense from a 1% increase in interest rates
due to varying interest rate reset dates on the Companys floating rate debt.
Raw Material and Commodity Price Risk
The Company is also subject to commodity price risk arising from price movements for certain
commodities included as part of its raw materials. The Company manages this commodity price risk
in some cases by entering into contracts with adjustable prices. The Company has not historically
used derivative commodity instruments in the management of this risk. The Company estimates that a
10% increase in the market prices of these commodities over the current market prices would
cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months by approximately $29 million assuming no
change in volume.
The Company uses derivative instruments to hedge all of the Companys projected diesel fuel
purchases for 2009 and 2010. These derivative instruments relate to diesel fuel used by the
Companys delivery fleet. The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the
corresponding period of the instrument. The Company currently accounts for its fuel hedges on a
mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment of fuel costs.
At the end of Q1 2009, the Company began using derivative instruments to hedge 75% of its
projected 2010 aluminum purchase requirements. During Q2 2009, the Company entered into
derivative agreements to hedge 75% of the Companys projected 2011 aluminum purchase requirements.
The Company pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the corresponding period of the instruments. The Company
accounts for its
63
Table of Contents
aluminum hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being
reflected as an adjustment to cost of sales.
Effects of Changing Prices
The principal effect of inflation on the Companys operating results is to increase costs. The
Company may raise selling prices to offset these cost increases; however, the resulting impact on
retail prices may reduce the volume of product purchased by consumers.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of
providing reasonable assurance the information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company
files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to
the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 27, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
64
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Except for the risk factors set forth below, there have been no material changes to the factors
disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 28, 2008.
Legislative changes that affect the Companys distribution, packaging and products could
reduce demand for the Companys products or increase the Companys costs.
The Companys business model is dependent on the availability of the Companys various
products and packages in multiple channels and locations to better satisfy the needs of the
Companys customers and consumers. Laws that restrict the Companys ability to distribute
products in schools and other venues, as well as laws that require deposits for certain types
of packages or those that limit the Companys ability to design new packages or market certain
packages, could negatively impact the financial results of the Company. In addition, taxes
imposed by individual states and localities could cause consumers to shift away from
purchasing products of the Company.
For example, some members of the U.S. Congress have raised the possibility of a federal tax on
the sale of certain sugar beverages, including non-diet soft drinks, fruit drinks, teas and
flavored waters, to help pay for the cost of healthcare reform. If enacted, such a tax would
materially affect the Companys business and financial results.
The Companys primary competitors have entered into definitive merger agreements with their
franchisor, and there is uncertainty about the impact such a transaction will have on the
Companys business.
The Companys primary competitors recently entered into definitive merger agreements with
their franchisor under which the franchisor will acquire, subject to the terms and conditions
of the merger agreements, all of the competitors outstanding shares of common stock not
already owned by the franchisor. At this time, it is not possible for the Company to evaluate
whether the transaction will have a material impact on the Companys business and financial
results.
65
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
4.1
|
The registrant, by signing this report, agrees to furnish the Securities and
Exchange Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument which defines the
rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and its consolidated
subsidiaries which authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10 percent
of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. |
|
12
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (filed herewith). | |
31.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
31.2
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
32
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
66
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED (REGISTRANT) |
||||
Date: November 6, 2009 | By: | /s/ James E. Harris | ||
James E. Harris | ||||
Principal Financial Officer of the
Registrant and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
||||
Date: November 6, 2009 | By: | /s/ William J. Billiard | ||
William J. Billiard | ||||
Principal Accounting Officer of
the Registrant and Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
||||
67