Coda Octopus Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 July (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended July 31, 2008
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
transition period from ______________ to ______________
Commission
File Number 000-52815
CODA
OCTOPUS GROUP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
34-200-8348
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
164
West, 25th
Street, 6th
Floor, New York
|
|
10001
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
|
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:
|
|
(212)
924-3442
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes o
No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer" and "large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check
one): o
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No
x
The
number of shares outstanding of issuer's common stock, $0.001 par value as
of
September 14, 2008: 48,853,664.
INDEX
|
Page
|
|||
PART
I - Financial Information
|
1
|
|||
|
||||
Item
1: Financial Statements
|
1
|
|||
|
||||
Nine
Months Ended July 31, 2008 and 2007
|
||||
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2008 (Unaudited) and October
31,
2007
|
1
|
|||
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for
the Three
and Nine Months Ended July 31, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
2
|
|||
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months
Ended July 31, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
3
|
|||
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended July
31,
2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|||
|
||||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|||
|
||||
Item
2: Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operation
|
16
|
|||
|
||||
Item
3:
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
|||
|
||||
PART
II - Other Information
|
24
|
|||
|
||||
Item
1: Legal Proceedings
|
24
|
|||
|
||||
Item
2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
24
|
|||
|
||||
Item
3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
24
|
|||
|
||||
Item
4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
24
|
|||
|
||||
Item
5: Other Information
|
24
|
|||
|
||||
Item
6: Exhibits
|
24
|
|||
|
||||
Signatures
|
24
|
i
Item
1. Financial Statements
CODA
OCTOPUS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
JULY
31, 2008 (UNAUDITED) AND OCTOBER 31, 2007
|
July
31,
2008
(Unaudited)
|
October
31, 2007
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
|
|
|||||
Current
assets:
|
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
6,050,996
|
$
|
916,257
|
|||
Short-term
investments, Note 3
|
272,000
|
935,000
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
|
2,400,265
|
2,720,151
|
|||||
Inventory
|
2,502,292
|
2,926,517
|
|||||
Due
from related parties, Note 12
|
160,289
|
105,685
|
|||||
Unbilled
receivables, Note 2
|
1,518,073
|
380,017
|
|||||
Other
current assets, Note 4
|
717,818
|
691,560
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
542,208
|
476,283
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
current assets
|
14,163,941
|
9,151,470
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Property
and equipment, net, Note 5
|
395,629
|
422,738
|
|||||
Goodwill
and other intangible assets, net, Note 6
|
5,566,171
|
4,007,253
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
20,125,741
|
$
|
13,581,461
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable, trade
|
$
|
962,029
|
$
|
1,618,250
|
|||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
1,821,150
|
1,937,569
|
|||||
Deferred
revenues, Note 2
|
355,796
|
593,325
|
|||||
Deferred
payment related to acquisitions, Note 13
|
-
|
763,936
|
|||||
Accrued
dividends on Series A&B Preferred Stock
|
31,149
|
86,766
|
|||||
Due
to related parties, Note 12
|
63,740
|
184,425
|
|||||
Loans
and notes payable, short term, Note 11
|
38,051
|
56,382
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
3,271,915
|
5,240,653
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Loans
and notes payable, long term, Note 11
|
12,429,845
|
265,139
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
liabilities
|
15,701,760
|
5,505,792
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, 6,287 and 6,407
Series A issued and outstanding, as of July 31, 2008 and October
31, 2007
respectively
|
6
|
6
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized, 48,753,664
and
48,245,768 shares issued and outstanding as of July 31, 2008 and
October
31, 2007 respectively
|
48,754
|
48,246
|
|||||
Common
Stock subscribed
|
-
|
80,000
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
51,166,908
|
49,785,244
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(924,657
|
)
|
(238,097
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(
45,867,030
|
)
|
(41,599,730
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
4,423,981
|
8,075,669
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
20,125,741
|
$
|
13,581,461
|
See
accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
CODA
OCTOPUS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
FOR
THE THREE
AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2008 and 2007
(UNAUDITED)
|
For
the three months
|
For the three months
|
For the nine months
|
For the nine months
|
|||||||||
|
ended
July 31,
|
ended July 31,
|
ended July 31,
|
ended July 31,
|
|||||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net
revenue
|
$
|
5,008,525
|
$
|
5,859,907
|
$
|
13,232,440
|
$
|
10,794,621
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
1,984,714
|
2,300,728
|
4,934,266
|
4,513,101
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,023,811
|
3,559,179
|
8,298,174
|
6,281,520
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
880,339
|
634,679
|
2,333,840
|
1,736,437
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
3,311,267
|
3,594,560
|
9,170,389
|
8,883,099
|
|||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
435,000
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
(1,167,795
|
)
|
(670,060
|
)
|
(3,206,055
|
)
|
(4,773,016
|
)
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Other
income
|
47,554
|
35,745
|
96,779
|
73,540
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(481,876
|
)
|
(561,350
|
)
|
(1,051,181
|
)
|
(6,349,946
|
)
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(434,322
|
)
|
(525,605
|
)
|
(954,402
|
)
|
(6,276,406
|
)
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(1,602,117
|
)
|
(1,195,665
|
)
|
(4,160,457
|
)
|
(11,049,422
|
)
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(1,602,117
|
)
|
(1,195,665
|
)
|
(4,160,457
|
)
|
(11,049,422
|
)
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Preferred
Stock Dividends:
|
|||||||||||||
Series
A
|
(31,819
|
)
|
(31,851
|
)
|
(106,843
|
)
|
(238,950
|
)
|
|||||
Series
B
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(107,680
|
)
|
||||||||
Beneficial
Conversion Feature
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(800,000
|
)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Loss Applicable to Common Shares
|
$
|
(1,633,936
|
)
|
$
|
(1,227,516
|
)
|
$
|
(4,267,300
|
)
|
$
|
(12,196,051
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Loss
per share, basic and diluted
|
(0.03
|
)
|
(0.03
|
)
|
(0.09
|
)
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
48,540,133
|
47,986,242
|
48,369,873
|
35,490,398
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,602,117
|
)
|
$
|
(1,195,665
|
)
|
$
|
(4,160,457
|
)
|
$
|
(11,049,422
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
98,390
|
55,209
|
(23,560
|
)
|
150,458
|
||||||||
Unrealized
loss on investment
|
(280,500
|
)
|
-
|
(663,000
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$
|
(1,784,227
|
)
|
$
|
(1,140,456
|
)
|
$
|
(4,847,017
|
)
|
$
|
(10,898,964
|
)
|
See
accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
CODA
OCTOPUS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
Preferred
Stock
Series
A
|
Preferred
Stock
Series
B
|
Common
Stock
|
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Subscribed
|
Capital
|
Loss
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
October 31, 2007
|
6,407
|
$
|
6
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
48,245,768
|
$
|
48,246
|
80,000
|
$
|
49,785,244
|
$
|
(238,097
|
)
|
$
|
(41,599,730
|
)
|
$
|
8,075,669
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale
of preferred stock
|
200
|
0
|
(20,000
|
)
|
20,000
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock
|
60,000
|
$
|
60
|
(60,000
|
)
|
$
|
59,940
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of preferred stock to common
|
(320
|
)
|
0
|
56,640
|
$
|
57
|
(56
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for compensation
|
352,937
|
353
|
$
|
238,123
|
$
|
238,476
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of options and warrants issued for compensation and
financing
|
$
|
1,022,160
|
$
|
1,022,160
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series
A
|
$
|
(106,843
|
)
|
$
|
(106,843
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series B | - | - |
$
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for preferred stock dividends
|
38,319
|
38
|
$
|
41,498
|
$
|
41,536
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
$
|
(23,560
|
)
|
$
|
(23,560
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss from marketable securities
|
$
|
(663,000
|
)
|
$
|
(663,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,160,457
|
)
|
$
|
(
4,160,457
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
July 31, 2008
|
6,287
|
$
|
6
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
48,753,664
|
$
|
48,754
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
51,166,909
|
$
|
(924,657
|
)
|
$
|
(45,867,030
|
)
|
$
|
4,423,981
|
See
accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
CODA
OCTOPUS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2008 and 2007
(UNAUDITED)
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(
4,160,457
|
)
|
$
|
(11,049,422
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|||||||
used
by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
453,623
|
226,309
|
|||||
Stock
based compensation
|
865,206
|
2,600,378
|
|||||
Financing
costs
|
395,430
|
5,989,488
|
|||||
Dividends
|
-
|
164,819
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
(Increase)
decrease in:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
319,886
|
(2,266,830
|
)
|
||||
Inventory
|
424,225
|
(391,865
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(65,927
|
)
|
(335,974
|
)
|
|||
Other
receivables
|
(1,515,028
|
)
|
(613,707
|
)
|
|||
Increase
(decrease) in:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(792,797
|
)
|
(2,309,944
|
)
|
|||
Due
to related parties
|
(41,945
|
)
|
(44,419
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(4,117,784
|
)
|
(8,031,167
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(110,416
|
)
|
(206,662
|
)
|
|||
Purchases
of intangible assets
|
(180,123
|
)
|
(136,854
|
)
|
|||
Acquisitions
|
(763,936
|
)
|
(1,358,470
|
)
|
|||
Cash
acquired from acquisitions
|
-
|
35,515
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(1,054,475
|
)
|
(1,666,471
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from (repayment of) loans
|
10,453,421
|
(1,124,447
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of stock
|
-
|
14,677,980
|
|||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
-
|
(1,818,100
|
)
|
||||
Preferred
stock dividend paid
|
(127,541
|
)
|
(606,597
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
10,325,880
|
11,128,836
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(18,882
|
)
|
85,737
|
||||
|
|||||||
Net
increase in cash
|
5,134,739
|
1,516,935
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
916,257
|
1,377,972
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
6,050,996
|
$
|
2,894,907
|
|||
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
376,909
|
$
|
359,907
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
-
|
-
|
Supplemental
Disclosures:
During
the Nine Months ended July 31, 2008, 391,256 shares of common stock were issued
as payment of $238,476 of compensation that was earned, $4,200 of non-cash
financing costs and $41,536 of series A preferred stock dividends
due.
During
the Nine Months ended July 31, 2007, 1,640,268 shares of common stock were
issued as payment of $1,770,233 of compensation that was earned.
See
accompanying notes to these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE
1 - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A
summary
of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements follows.
General
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance
with instructions to SEC form 10Q-SB. Accordingly, they do not include all
of
the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements.
In
the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Accordingly,
the results from operations for the nine month period ended July 31, 2008,
are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ended October 31, 2008. The unaudited condensed financial statements should
be
read in conjunction with the consolidated October 31, 2007 financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s 10K-SB filed on February 26,
2008 with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).
Business
and Basis of Presentation
Coda
Octopus Group, Inc. (”we”,
“us”,“our
company”
or
“Coda”),
a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Florida, is a developer
of underwater technologies and equipment for imaging, mapping, defense and
survey applications. We are based in New York, with research and development,
sales and manufacturing facilities located in the United Kingdom and Norway,
and
additional sales locations in Florida, Utah and Washington, D.C.
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Coda and our domestic
and foreign subsidiaries that are more than 50% owned and controlled. All
significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
the
consolidated financial statement.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are based on management's
best knowledge of current events and actions that we may undertake in the
future, actual results may differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
We
record
revenue in accordance with the guidance of the SEC's Staff
Accounting Bulletin SAB
No. 104
(SAB
104), which supersedes SAB
No. 101
in order
to encompass Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
No. 00-21,
Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
. Our
revenue is derived from sales of underwater technologies and equipment for
imaging, mapping, defense and survey applications. Revenue is recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services
have been rendered, the contract price is fixed or determinable, and
collectability is reasonably assured. No right of return privileges are granted
to customers after shipment.
For
arrangements with multiple deliverables, we recognize product revenue by
allocating the revenue to each deliverable based on the fair value of each
deliverable in accordance with EITF
No. 00-21
and
SAB
No. 104,
and
recognize revenue for equipment upon delivery and for installation and other
services as performed. EITF
No. 00-21
was
effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2003.
Our
contracts sometimes require customer payments in advance of revenue recognition.
These deposit amounts are reflected as liabilities and recognized as revenue
when the Company has fulfilled its obligations under the respective
contracts.
Revenues
derived from our software license sales are recognized in accordance with
Statement of Position (SOP) No.
97-2,
“Software Revenue Recognition”, and SOP
No. 98-9,
“Modifications of SOP
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions”. For software
license sales for which any services rendered are not considered essential
to
the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue upon delivery of the
software, provided (1) there is evidence of an arrangement, (2) collection
of
our fee is considered probable and (3) the fee is fixed and
determinable.
5
Foreign
Currency Translation
Coda
translates the foreign currency financial statements of its foreign subsidiaries
in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 52, Foreign
Currency Translation.
Assets
and liabilities are translated at exchange rates existing at the balance sheet
dates, related revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates
in
effect during the period and stockholders’ equity, fixed assets and long-term
investments are recorded at historical exchange rates. Resulting translation
adjustments are recorded as a separate component in stockholders' equity as
part
of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Foreign currency transaction
gains and losses are included in the statement of income.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
income taxes are provided using the asset and liability method for financial
reporting purposes in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting
for Income Taxes.
Under
this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary
differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying
values for financial reporting purposes, and for operating loss and tax credit
carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be removed or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized
in
the consolidated statements of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash
equivalents are comprised of highly liquid investments with maturity of three
months or less when purchased. We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts,
which at times, may exceed insured limits. We have not experienced any losses
in
such accounts.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments and related items, which potentially subject us to concentrations
of
credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. We place our cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality
institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of applicable
government mandated insurance limits.
Accounts
Receivable
We
periodically review our trade receivables in determining our allowance for
doubtful accounts. Allowance for doubtful accounts was nil for the period ended
July 31, 2008 and $17,910 for the year ended October 31, 2007.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
SFAS
No.
107, "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires
disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments. The carrying
value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other receivables,
accounts payable and short-term borrowings, as reflected in the balance sheets,
approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Our long term debt has interest rates that approximate market and therefore
the
carrying amounts approximate their fair values.
Inventory
Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in first-out method.
Inventory is comprised of the following components at July 31, 2008 and October
31, 2007:
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
2,057,969
|
$
|
1,789,051
|
|||
Work
in process
|
22,745
|
334,813
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
421,578
|
802,653
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
inventory
|
$
|
2,502,292
|
$
|
2,926,517
|
Property
and Equipment
We
record
our equipment at historical cost. We expense maintenance and repairs as
incurred. Depreciation is provided for by the straight-line method over three
to
four years, the estimated useful lives of the property and
equipment.
Long-Lived
Assets
We
follow
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for Impairment of Disposal of Long-Lived Assets",
which established a "primary asset" approach to determine the cash flow
estimation period for a group of assets and liabilities that represents the
unit
of accounting for a long-lived asset to be held and used. Long-lived assets
to
be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if
it
exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the
use
and eventual disposition of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of
are
reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. No
impairment loss was recognized during the period ended July 31, 2008 or the
year
ended October 31, 2007.
6
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs consist of expenditures for the present and future patents
and technology, which cannot be capitalized. We are eligible for United Kingdom
tax credits related to our qualified research and development expenditures.
Tax
credits are classified as a reduction of research and development expense.
We
recorded no tax credits during the period ended July 31, 2008 or the year ended
October 31, 2007.
Marketing
We
charge
the costs of marketing to expense as incurred. For the period ended July 31,
2008 marketing costs were $913,760 and $200,459 for the period ended July 31,
2007.
Other
Operating Expenses
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets consist principally of the excess of cost over the fair value of net
assets acquired (or goodwill), customer relationships, non-compete agreements
and licenses. Goodwill was allocated to our reporting units based on the
original purchase price allocation. Customer relationships, non-compete
agreements and licenses are being amortized on a straight-line basis over
periods of 3 to 10 years. The Company amortizes its intangible assets using
the
straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit. We periodically
evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets and take into account events
or
circumstances that warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that indicate
that impairment exists.
We
test
for impairment at the reporting unit level as defined in SFAS No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This test is a two-step process. The
first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential
impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying
amount, including goodwill. If the fair value, which is based on future cash
flows, exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. If
the
carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step must be performed to
measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step compares
the
implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of
that goodwill. In the fourth quarter of each year, we evaluate goodwill on
a
separate reporting unit basis to assess recoverability, and impairments, if
any,
are recognized in earnings. An impairment loss would be recognized in an amount
equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill over the implied
fair
value of the goodwill. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible
assets with determinable useful lives be amortized over their respective
estimated useful lives and reviewed annually for impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 144.
Stock
Based Compensation
SFAS
No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, established and
encouraged the use of the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based
compensation arrangements under which compensation cost is determined using
the
fair value of stock-based compensation determined as of the date of the grant
or
the date at which the performance of the services is completed and is recognized
over the periods in which the related services are rendered. The statement
also
permitted companies to elect to continue using the current intrinsic value
accounting method specified in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion
No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, to account for
stock-based compensation to employees. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R)
we
elected to use the intrinsic value based method for grants to our employees
and
directors and have disclosed the pro forma effect of using the fair value based
method to account for our stock-based compensation to employees.
On
December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“Statement 123R”) which is a
revision of SFAS No. 123.
Statement
123R supersedes APB opinion No. 25 and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash
Flows”. Generally, the approach in Statement 123R is similar to the approach
described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123R requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro-forma
disclosure is no longer an alternative. This statement does not change the
accounting guidance for share based payment transactions with parties other
than
employees provided in SFAS No. 123(R). This statement does not address the
accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA
Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership
Plans.” On April 14, 2005, the SEC amended the effective date of the provisions
of this statement. The effect of this amendment by the SEC is that the Company
had to comply with Statement 123R and use the Fair Value based method of
accounting no later than the first quarter of 2006. We implemented SFAS
No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method.
The fair value of each option grant issued after January 1, 2006 will be
determined as of grant date, utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The amortization of each option grant will be over the remainder of the vesting
period of each option grant. We did not have any unvested amounts of stock
based compensation grants issued and outstanding at the date of
implementation.
7
We
use
the fair value method for equity instruments granted to non-employees and use
the Black-Scholes model for measuring the fair value. The stock based fair
value
compensation is determined as of the date of the grant or the date at which
the
performance of the services is completed (measurement date) and is recognized
over the periods in which the related services are rendered.
Comprehensive
Income
SFAS
No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", establishes standards for reporting
and
displaying of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances.
Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity except those
resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other
disclosures, SFAS 130 requires that all items that are required to be recognized
under current accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be
reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence
as
other financial statements. Comprehensive income includes gains and losses
on
foreign currency translation adjustments and is included as a component of
stockholders' equity.
Loss
Per Share
We
use
SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share” for calculating the basic and diluted
loss per share. We compute basic loss per share by dividing net loss and net
loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic
loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number
of
additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential
shares had been issued and if the additional shares were dilutive. Common
equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of net loss per share if
their effect is anti-dilutive.
Per
share
basic and diluted net loss amounted to $0.09 and $0.34 for the periods
ended July 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the period ended July 31, 2008
and year ended October 31, 2007, 49,896,559 and 36,508,028 potential shares,
respectively, were excluded from the shares used to calculate diluted earnings
per share as their inclusion would reduce net loss per share.
Liquidity
As
of
July 31, 2008 we have cash and cash equivalents of $6,050,996 and positive
working capital of $10,892,026. For the period ended July 31, 2008 we had a
net
loss of $4,160,457 and negative cash flow from operations of $4,117,784. We
also
have an accumulated deficit of $45,867,030 at July 31, 2008.
NOTE
2 - CONTRACTS IN PROGRESS
Costs
and
estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts represent
accumulated project expenses and fees which have not been invoiced to customers
as of the date of the balance sheet. These amounts are stated on the balance
sheet as Unbilled Receivables of $1,518,073 and $380,017 as of July 31, 2008
and
October 31, 2007 respectively.
Billings
in excess of cost and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts represent
project invoices billed to customers that have not been earned as of the date
of
the balance sheet. These amounts are stated on the balance sheet as Deferred
Revenue of $166,311 and $359,775 as of July 31, 2008 and October 31, 2007
respectively.
Revenue
received as part of sales of equipment includes a provision for warranty and
is
treated as deferred revenue, along with extended warranty sales, with these
amounts amortized over 12 months from the date of sale. These amounts are stated
on the balance sheet as Deferred Revenue of $189,485 and $233,550 as of July
31,
2008 and October 31, 2007 respectively.
NOTE
3 - INVESTMENTS
Securities
which the Company does not have the intent to hold are classified as available
for sale. Marketable securities that are bought and held principally for the
purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities
and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized
in
earnings. Marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale
and
are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net
of
tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income and reported in
shareholder's equity.
The
fair
value of all securities is determined by quoted market prices. Gains or losses
on securities sold are based on the specific identification method. During
the
year ended October 31, 2007, the Company received marketable securities worth
$850,000 in settlement of a $533,147 loan and $316,853 of accounts receivable.
As of July 31, 2008, the value of the investment, which is available-for-sale
for financial reporting purposes, was $272,000, compared with $935,000 at
October 31, 2007. This includes an unrealized loss of $663,000 which has been
included in the determination of comprehensive loss.
8
NOTE
4 - OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Other
current assets on the balance sheet total $717,818 and $691,560 at July 31,
2008
and October 31, 2007 respectively. These totals comprise the
following:
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Deposits
|
$
|
117,698
|
$
|
191,352
|
|||
Value
added tax (VAT)
|
284,855
|
293,934
|
|||||
Other
receivables
|
315,265
|
206,274
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
717,818
|
$
|
691,560
|
NOTE
5 - FIXED ASSETS
Property
and equipment at July 31, 2008 and October 31, 2007 is summarized as
follows:
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
||
Machinery
and equipment
|
|
$
|
1,093,531
|
|
$
|
983,115
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
(697,902
|
)
|
|
(560,377
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
property and equipment assets
|
|
$
|
395,629
|
|
$
|
422,738
|
|
Depreciation
expense recorded in the statement of operations for the periods ended July
31,
2008 and October 31, 2007 is $137,525 and $101,802, respectively.
Rental
equipment at July 31, 2008 and October 31, 2007 is summarized as
follows:
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Rental
equipment
|
$
|
240,876
|
$
|
240,876
|
|||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(240,876
|
)
|
(240,876
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Net
rental equipment assets
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
Depreciation
expense recorded in the statement of operations for the periods ended July
31,
2008 and October 31, 2007 is nil and $120,851, respectively.
NOTE
6 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
The
Company has adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, whereby
the Company periodically tests its intangible assets for impairment. On an
annual basis, and when there is reason to suspect that their values have been
diminished or impaired, these assets are tested for impairment, and write-downs
will be included in results from operations.
The
identifiable intangible assets acquired and their carrying value at July 31,
2008 and October 31, 2007 is:
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Customer
relationships (weighted average life of 10 years)
|
$
|
694,503
|
$
|
694,503
|
|||
Non-compete
agreements (weighted average life of 3 years)
|
198,911
|
198,911
|
|||||
Patents
(weighted average life of 10 years)
|
63,695
|
48,530
|
|||||
Convertible
debenture raise costs (expected life of 7 years)
|
1,694,893
|
-
|
|||||
Product
development (weighted average life of 3 years)
|
119,491
|
-
|
|||||
Licenses
(weighted average life of 2 years)
|
100,000
|
100,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
amortized identifiable intangible assets - gross carrying
value
|
2,871,493
|
1,041,944
|
|||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
(404,897
|
)
|
(134,266
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Net
|
2,466,596
|
907,678
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Residual
value
|
$
|
2,466,596
|
$
|
907,678
|
9
Our
acquisition of Colmek resulted in the valuation of Colmek’s customer
relationships and covenants not to compete as intangible assets (see Note 10),
which have an estimated useful life of 10 years and 3 years respectively, and
as
such are being amortized monthly over that period. Goodwill of $2,038,669
represented the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net
tangible and intangible assets acquired.
Estimated
amortization expense as of July 31, 2008 is as follows:
2008
|
$
|
167,236
|
||
2009
|
430,189
|
|||
2010
|
349,054
|
|||
2011
|
325,330
|
|||
2012
and thereafter
|
1,194,787
|
|||
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
2,466,596
|
Amortization
of patents, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and licenses included
as a charge to income amounted to $316,098 and $115,005 for the period ended
July 31, 2008 and year ended October 31, 2007, respectively. Goodwill is not
being amortized.
As
a
result of the acquisitions of Martech and Colmek, the Company has goodwill
in
the amount of $3,099,575 as of July 31, 2008 and October 31, 2007. The changes
in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period ended July 31, 2008 and year
ended October 31, 2007 are recorded below.
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Beginning
goodwill balance at November 1
|
$
|
3,099,575
|
$
|
1,060,906
|
|||
Goodwill
recorded upon acquisition
|
-
|
2,038,669
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Period
End Balance
|
$
|
3,099,575
|
$
|
3,099,575
|
Considerable
management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. We enlist the
assistance of an independent valuation consultant to determine the values of
our
intangible assets and goodwill, both at the dates of acquisition and at specific
dates annually. Based on various market factors and projections used by
management, actual results could vary significantly from managements'
estimates.
NOTE
7 - CAPITAL STOCK
The
Company is authorized to issue 150,000,000 shares of common stock with a par
value of $.001 per share. As of July 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has issued
and outstanding 48,753,664 shares and 48,143,656 shares of common stock
respectively. The Company is also authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock with a par value of $.001 per share. We have designated 50,000
preferred shares as Series A preferred stock and have designated 50,000
preferred shares as Series B preferred stock. The remaining 4,900,000 shares
of
preferred stock is undesignated. There were 6,287 and 6,407 Series A preferred
shares outstanding at July 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively, and nil Series B
preferred shares outstanding at the same dates.
Series
A Preferred Stock
We
designated 50,000 shares of our preferred stock, par value $.001, as Series
A
Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to all classes of
common and preferred stock. The Series A Preferred Stock has a dividend rate
of
12% per year. The Series A Preferred Stock and accrued dividends is convertible
at the option of the holder into shares of our common stock at a conversion
price of $1.00 per share, and at the option of the Company when the stock price
reaches or exceeds $3.00.
During
the period ended July 31, 2008 we issued 200 shares of Series A Preferred Stock,
which were subscribed for in the year ended October 31, 2007. At July 31, 2008,
the total of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding is 6,287 shares, convertible
into 1,013,670 shares of common stock.
During
the year ended October 31, 2007 we did not issue any shares of Series A
Preferred Stock. However, we did convert 17,234 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock into 2,878,418 shares of common stock and 1,439,209 warrants with a
conversion price of $1.30 and 1,439,209 warrants with a conversion price of
$1.70. At October 31, 2007, the total of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding
was 6,407 shares, convertible into 1,050,310 shares of common
stock.
Series
B Preferred Stock
We
designated 50,000 shares of our preferred stock, par value $.001, as Series
B
Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock ranks junior to our issued and
outstanding Series A preferred Stock and senior to all classes of common stock.
The Series B Preferred Stock has a dividend rate of 8% per year. The Series
B
Preferred Stock and accrued dividends are convertible at the option of the
holder into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share.
As of July 31, 2008, we have no shares of Series B Preferred Stock
outstanding.
10
During
the period ended October 31, 2007, we sold 8,000 preferred Series B stock units,
each unit consisting of one share of our Series B Preferred Stock, 100 Series
A
warrants, 100 Series B warrants, and 81.25 shares of common stock (650,000
shares of common stock in total). Each Series A warrant and Series B warrant
is
exercisable into shares of our common stock for a period of five years at
exercise prices of $1.30 and $1.70 per share, respectively. Gross and net
proceeds from the sale of the units were $800,000.
In
accordance with EITF No. 00-27, “Application
of EITF Issue No. 98-5, ‘Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial
Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Rates’, to Certain
convertible Instruments”,
a
portion of the proceeds of our stock sales were allocated to the warrants based
on their relative fair value.
For
the
sale of Series B Preferred Stock, this totaled $546,566 using the Black
Scholes option pricing model. Further, we attributed a beneficial conversion
feature of $253,434 to the Series B preferred shares based upon the
difference between the conversion price of those shares and the closing price
of
our common shares on the date of issuance, limited to the proceeds attributable
to the sale of the preferred shares. The weighted average assumptions used
in
the Black Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of
0%; (2) expected volatility of 304%, (3) risk-free interest rate
of 4.90%, and (4) expected life of 2 years as the conversion
feature and warrants are immediately exercisable. Both the fair value of the
warrants and the beneficial conversion feature aggregating $800,000 were
recorded as a dividend and are included in the accompanying financial
statements.
Also
during the year, 30,819 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted into
3,081,900 shares of common stock. In addition, 18,181 shares of Series B
Preferred Stock were redeemed at a price of $110 per share, which included
the
dividend accrued from the previous year, with the remainder booked as a
redemption premium.
Common
Stock
During
the period ending July 31, 2008 we issued 352,937 shares of common stock, valued
at $238,476, to employees, directors and consultants for services, of which
$202,750 was subscribed for during the year ending October 31, 2007. We also
issued 38,319 shares of common stock as dividend payments due to holders of
Series A Preferred stock, which had accrued over the period August 2006 to
April
2008, valued at $41,537. We also issued 60,000 shares to an investor who had
subscribed for these shares in February 2007 and 4,200 shares for financing,
and
56,640 shares to an investor on conversion of 320 shares of Series A Preferred
stock.
During
the year ending October 31, 2007 we sold 15,025,000 shares of common stock,
valued at $1 each, with a further 60,000 shares subscribed for during the year.
These shares were issued alongside 7,542,500 Series A warrants and 7,542,500
Series B warrants, along with 2,400,000 warrants convertible into common stock
at a price of $1.00 as part of placement agent fees. Each Series A warrant
is
convertible into common stock at a price of $1.30, and each Series B warrant
is
convertible into common stock at $1.70, and each warrant has a life of 5 years.
The gross amount raised was $15,025,000, with $13,764,530 raised
net.
A
further
650,000 shares of common stock were sold as part of a unit with Series B
Preferred Stock.
During
the year ending October 31, 2007 we issued 532,090 shares of common stock,
valued at $792,814, as part payment in our acquisition of Miller & Hilton,
Inc, d/b/a Colmek Systems Engineering.
During
the year ending October 31, 2007 a total of 34,100 shares of common stock were
issued on the exercise of 34,100 stock options, with a conversion value of
$1.00
each. The amount received was $34,100.
During
the year ending October 31, 2007 a total of 3,081,900 shares of common stock
were issued on conversion of 30,819 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. In
addition, 2,878,418 shares of common stock were issued on conversion of 17,234
shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
Other
Equity Transactions
During
the period ended July 31, 2008, we issued in the aggregate 335,000 common share
purchase options to employees and consultants, with exercise prices of $1.30
to
$1.50. The initial fair value of the options was $194,135 using the Black
Scholes method at the date of grant of the options based on the following
assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 5.25%; (2) dividend yield of 0%;
(3)
volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 246%-260%;
and (4) an expected life of the options of 2 years. The fair value of the vested
options has been expensed in this period. In accordance with EITF 96-18, the
fair value of consultant vesting options will be recomputed at each reporting
period and any increase will be charged to expense.
Also
during the period ended July 31, 2008, a further 524,900 common share purchase
options which were issued to employees in 2005, 2006 and 2007 vested, with
$436,795 charged to expense.
During
the year ending October 31, 2007, we issued in the aggregate 1,500,000 common
share purchase options to employees and consultants, with exercise prices of
$1.00 to $1.80. The initial fair value of the options was $1,828,811 using
the
Black Scholes method at the date of grant of the options based on the following
assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 4.90%-5.25%; (2) dividend yield
of
0%; (3) volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock
of
252% - 328%; and (4) an expected life of the options of 2 years. The fair value
of the options has been expensed in this period. In accordance with EITF 96-18,
the fair value of consultant vesting options will be recomputed at each
reporting period and any increase will be charged to expense. Due to staff
departures, 330,000 options were cancelled, all of which had exercise prices
of
$1.00 to $1.50. Also during the year, a total of 34,100 options were exercised
at $1.00. During the period ended October 31, 2007, $1,036,454 was charged
to
expense.
During
the period ended July 31, 2008, we issued 600,000 warrants to purchase common
stock, 300,000 at an exercise price of $1.30 and 300,000 at an exercise price
of
$1.70. This was in connection with our debt financing, which was finalized
in
February 2008. The initial fair value of the warrants was $391,230 using the
Black Scholes method at the date of grant of the warrants based on the following
assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 4.57%; (2) dividend yield of 0%;
(3)
volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 234%;
and
(4) an expected life of the warrants of 2 years. The fair value of the warrants
has been expensed in this period.
11
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
During the year ending October 31, 2007, we issued 22,045,418 warrants to purchase common stock with exercise prices of $1.00 to $1.70. The initial fair value of the warrants was $ using the Black Scholes method at the date of grant of the warrants based on the following assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 4.90% - 5.25%; (2) dividend yield of 0%; (3) volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 260% - 304%; and (4) an expected life of the warrants of 2 years. The fair value of the warrants was expensed in this period.
Transactions
involving stock options and warrants issued are summarized as
follows:
|
Nine
months ended
July
31, 2008
|
Year
ended
October
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||
Number
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of the period
|
36,519,318
|
$
|
1.39
|
13,410,000
|
$
|
1.29
|
|||||||
Granted
during the period
|
935,000
|
1.43
|
23,473,418
|
1.44
|
|||||||||
Exercised
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
(34,100
|
)
|
1.00
|
||||||||
Terminated
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
(330,000
|
)
|
1.22
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at the end of the period
|
37,454,318
|
$
|
1.39
|
36,519,318
|
$
|
1.39
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Exercisable
at the end of the period
|
36,860,517
|
$
|
1.39
|
35,467,518
|
$
|
1.39
|
The
number and weighted average exercise prices of stock purchase options and
warrants outstanding as of July 31, 2008 are as follows:
Range
of
Exercise
Prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average Contractual Life (Yrs)
|
Total
Vested
|
|||||||
0.50
|
750,000
|
2.75
|
750,000
|
|||||||
0.58
|
400,000
|
2.67
|
400,000
|
|||||||
1.00
|
5,845,900
|
3.82
|
5,789,800
|
|||||||
1.30
|
15,171,709
|
3.43
|
14,879,059
|
|||||||
1.50
|
525,000
|
3.35
|
435,250
|
|||||||
1.70
|
14,701,709
|
3.41
|
14,566,409
|
|||||||
1.80
|
60,000
|
4.15
|
40,000
|
|||||||
Totals
|
37,454,318
|
3.30
|
36,860,517
|
NOTE
9 - INCOME TAXES
The
Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standard No. 109 which requires the
recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future
tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or
tax
returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined
based on the difference between financial statements and tax bases of assets
and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable
income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes are
insignificant.
For
income tax reporting purposes, the Company's aggregate U.S. unused net operating
losses approximate $43,017,000 which expire through 2028, subject to limitations
of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The deferred tax asset
related to the carry forward is approximately $14,626,000. The Company has
provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net operating loss
benefit, because in the opinion of management based upon the earning history
of
the Company, it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be
realized.
For
income tax reporting purposes, the Company's aggregate UK unused net operating
losses approximate $3,251,000, with no expiration. The deferred tax asset
related to the carry-forward is approximately $975,000. The Company has provided
a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net operating loss benefit,
because in the opinion of management based upon the earning history of the
Company, it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be
realized.
12
Income
tax expense for 2007 represents income taxes on our Norwegian
subsidiary.
Components
of deferred tax assets as of July 31, 2008 and October 31, 2007 are as
follows:
Non-Current
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Net
Operating Loss Carry Forward
|
$
|
14,626,000
|
$
|
10,455,000
|
|||
Valuation
Allowance
|
(14,626,000
|
)
|
(10,455,000
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Net
Deferred Tax Asset
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
Litigation
We
may
become subject to legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary
course of our business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements
may
occur, we believe that the final disposition of any matters should not have
a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
Factoring
Agreement
We
factor
certain of our receivables pursuant to a factoring agreement. Advances received
pursuant to the agreement are secured by our accounts receivable.
An
initial factoring agreement was entered into on August 17, 2005 between Faunus
Group International, Inc. (“FGI”) and Coda Octopus Group, Inc., for a maximum
borrowing in the US of up to $1 million. This agreement can be cancelled with
three months’ notice before each anniversary date. Subsequent agreements were
added in November 2006 covering our UK businesses, Martech Systems Ltd and
Coda
Octopus Products Ltd, both of which are on the same terms as the original
agreement, except for the initial term, which is a minimum of two years. All
agreements end in October 2008 and notice has been served to this
effect.
Over
the
course of the period to July 31, 2008, we factored invoices totaling $5,234,132
in receivables and we received $3,979,695 in proceeds from FGI. This compares
with the year to October 31, 2007, where we factored invoices totaling
$5,088,665 in receivables and we received $3,961,695 in proceeds from
FGI.
Under
the
arrangement, FGI typically advances to the Company 80% of the total amount
of
accounts receivable factored. FGI retains 20% of the outstanding factored
accounts receivable as a reserve, which it holds until the customer pays the
factored invoice to FGI. The cost of funds for the accounts receivable portion
of the borrowings with FGI is 1.85% for the initial 30 day credit period, up
to
a maximum of 45 days; thereafter, an additional fee of 0.5% is charged for
each
10 day period.
Operating
Leases
We
occupy
our various office and warehouse facilities pursuant to both term and
month-to-month leases. Our term leases expire at various times through September
2013. Future minimum lease obligations are approximately $1,308,794, with the
minimum future rentals due under these leases as of July 31, 2008 as
follows:
2008
|
$
|
98,452
|
||
2009
|
360,552
|
|||
2010
|
344,368
|
|||
2011
|
315,302
|
|||
2012
and thereafter
|
190,121
|
|||
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
1,308,794
|
Concentrations
We
had no
concentrations of purchases of over 5% during either of the period ended July
31, 2008 and year ended October 31, 2007. We had a sales concentration of over
5% for the period ended July 31, 2008 and year ended October 31, 2007 due to
a
sale to a customer for $1,580,177 and $2,294,279, respectively.
13
NOTE
11 - NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE
A
summary
of notes payable at July 31, 2008 and October 31, 2007 is as
follows:
|
July
31,
2008
|
October
31, 2007
|
|||||
The
Company, through its UK subsidiary Coda Octopus Products Ltd has
a 7 year
unsecured loan note ; interest rate of 12% annually; repayable at
borrower’s instigation or convertible into common stock when the share
price reaches $3.
|
|
198,060
|
|
200,000
|
|||
|
|||||||
The
Company, through its US subsidiary Innalogic, Inc., had a capital
lease
for equipment for monthly payments of $2,369.74 for 24
months.
|
-
|
41,091
|
|||||
|
|||||||
The
Company has an unsecured revolving line of credit with a US bank
through
its US subsidiary Colmek Systems Engineering, for $50,000 with an
interest
rate of 12.5% annually; repayable at borrower’s
instigation.
|
11,181
|
17,181
|
|||||
|
|||||||
The
Company through its US subsidiary Colmek Systems Engineering, has
an
outstanding loan note payable for the financing of a truck over 60
months;
monthly payments of $897.18; annual interest rate of
10.99%.
|
22,630
|
29,145
|
|||||
|
|||||||
The
Company through its US subsidiary Colmek Systems Engineering, has
an
unsecured loan note payable to a director and former officer of the
Company.
|
16,104
|
34,104
|
|||||
The
Company has a secured convertible debenture for $12M, with a life
of 7
years from February 26, 2008, maturing at 130% of face value, and
with
interest payable every six months, starting in February 2009, at
a rate of
8.5%
|
12,219,921
|
-
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
12,467,896
|
$
|
321,521
|
|||
|
|||||||
Less:
current portion
|
38,051
|
56,382
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
long-term portion
|
$
|
12,429,845
|
$
|
265,139
|
NOTE
12 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We
are
indebted to various related parties for advances for payments of operating
expenses and dividends. These related parties include our biggest shareholder
and other entities controlled by this shareholder. Advances are non interest
bearing and are due on demand. At the end of the period ending July 31, 2008,
$63,740 was due to related parties, compared with $184,425 for the year ending
October 31, 2007.
We
are
also owed by related parties a sum of $160,289 at July 31, 2008 compared to
$105,685 at October 31, 2007.
NOTE
13 - ACQUISITIONS
Acquisition
of Colmek Systems Engineering
On
April
6, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Miller & Hilton d/b/a Colmek
Systems Engineering, a Utah corporation (“Colmek”). The total purchase price was
$2,356,750, with additional associated costs and outlays of $158,470, consisting
of cash paid at the closing of the transaction in the amount of $800,000 and
the
issuance of 532,090 shares of our common stock (valued at $792,814), and
$700,000 and 42,910 shares that were due on the first anniversary of the closing
date through secured promissory notes issued to the former Colmek shareholders
-
the promissory note allowed for interest on these amounts and the shares due
to
be converted to cash at the option of the promissory note holder and the amount
paid in cash in full settlement of these promissory notes was $763,936. The
shares of common stock issued in conjunction with the merger were not registered
under the Securities Act of 1933. The acquisition of Colmek was accounted for
using the purchase method in accordance with SFAS 141. The results of operations
for Colmek have been included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
since
the date of acquisition.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 141, the total purchase price was allocated to the
estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The estimate
of
fair value of the assets acquired was based on management’s and an independent
appraiser’s estimates. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets and
liabilities acquired as follows:
Current
assets acquired
|
$
|
231,043
|
||
Equipment,
net
|
80,007
|
|||
Current
liabilities assumed
|
(727,913
|
)
|
||
Customer
relationships acquired
|
694,503
|
|||
Non-compete
agreements acquired
|
198,911
|
|||
Goodwill
acquired
|
2,038,669
|
|||
Total
purchase price
|
$
|
2,515,220
|
14
The
intangible assets of $893,414 at the date of acquisition consisted of customer
relationships and non-compete agreements. The intangible assets acquired have
an
estimated useful life of 10 and 3 years, respectively, and as such will be
amortized monthly over those periods. Goodwill of $2,038,669 represented the
excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and
intangible assets acquired, plus the associated costs and outlays.
The
following unaudited pro forma results of operations for the period ended
July 31, 2007 assume that the acquisition of Colmek occurred on November 1,
2006. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the
actual results of operations that would have been achieved nor are they
necessarily indicative of future results of operations. There is no change
to
the period to July 31, 2008.
|
2007
|
|||
|
|
|||
Revenue
|
$
|
11,026,496
|
||
Net
loss
|
(11,261,417
|
)
|
||
Loss
per common share
|
(0.35
|
)
|
NOTE
14 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
Due
to
the nature of our businesses, we are operating in two reportable segments,
which
are managed separately based upon fundamental differences in their operations.
Martech, Colmek, and Innalogic operate as contractors, and the balance of our
operations is comprised of product sales.
Segment
operating income is total segment revenue reduced by operating expenses
identifiable with the business segment. Corporate includes general corporate
administrative costs.
The
Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based upon operating
income. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as
those
described in the summary of accounting policies.
There
are
inter-segment sales between our engineering contracting businesses and our
products businesses.
The
following table summarizes segment asset and operating balances by reportable
segment.
|
Contracting
|
Products
|
Corporate
|
Totals
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
4,806,132
|
$
|
6,832,011
|
$
|
1,594,297
|
$
|
13,232,440
|
|||||
Operating
profit/(loss)
|
(477,367
|
)
|
1,533,634
|
(
4,262,322
|
)
|
(3,206,055
|
)
|
||||||
Identifiable
assets
|
6,139,546
|
4,331,717
|
9,654,478
|
20,125,741
|
|||||||||
Capital
expenditure
|
13,999
|
170,543
|
225,486
|
410,028
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general & administrative
|
2,504,911
|
2,014,060
|
4,651,418
|
9,170,389
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
196,161
|
66,086
|
191,376
|
453,623
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
74,522
|
254,229
|
722,430
|
1,051,181
|
The
Company’s reportable business segments operate in two geographic locations.
Those geographic locations are:
*
United
States
*
United
Kingdom
The
Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based upon operating
income. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as
those
described in the summary of accounting policies. There are no inter-segment
sales.
Information
concerning principal geographic areas is presented below according to the area
where the activity is taking place for the period ending July 31, 2008 and
the
year ending October 31, 2007:
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenues:
|
|
|
|||||
United
States
|
$
|
4,662,474
|
$
|
7,129,507
|
|||
United
Kingdom
|
6,975,669
|
6,723,806
|
|||||
Corporate
and other
|
1,594,297
|
-
|
|||||
Total
Revenues
|
$
|
13,232,440
|
$
|
13,853,313
|
|||
|
|||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
5,087,371
|
$
|
5,529,261
|
|||
United
Kingdom
|
5,383,892
|
6,597,202
|
|||||
Corporate
and other
|
9,654,478
|
1,454,999
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
20,125,741
|
$
|
13,581,462
|
NOTE
15 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
There
were no significant events which occurred between July 31, 2008 and the date
of
filing.
15
Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
Forward-Looking
Statements
The
information herein contains forward-looking statements. All statements other
than statements of historical fact made herein are forward looking. In
particular, the statements herein regarding industry prospects and future
results of operations or financial position are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such
as
“believes,” “estimates,” “could,” “possibly,” “probably,” anticipates,”
“projects,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” or “should” or other variations or similar
words. No assurances can be given that the future results anticipated by the
forward-looking statements will be achieved. Forward-looking statements reflect
management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual
results may differ significantly from management’s expectations.
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our
financial statements, included herewith. This discussion should not be construed
to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the
future, or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative
of
actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the
best
present assessment of our management.
General
Overview
We
are a
developer of underwater technologies and equipment for imaging, mapping, defense
and survey applications. We are based in New York, with research and
development, sales and manufacturing facilities located in the United Kingdom,
United States and Norway as well as two engineering companies located in the
United States and the United Kingdom.
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Coda Octopus and
our
domestic and foreign subsidiaries that are more than 50% owned and controlled
except that the financial statements, including Colmek, which was acquired
on
April 6, 2007. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have
been
eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are based on management's
best knowledge of current events and actions that we may undertake in the
future, actual results may differ from those estimates.
Background
We
are
engaged in 3-D subsea technology and are the developer and patent holder of
real-time 3-D sonar products which we expect to play a critical role in the
next
generation of underwater port security. We produce hardware, software and fully
integrated systems which are sold and supported on a worldwide basis, with
wide
applications in two distinct market segments:
·
|
marine
geophysical survey (commercial), which focuses around oil and gas,
construction and oceanographic research and exploration, where we
market
to survey companies, research institutions, salvage companies. This
was
our original focus, from original founding in 1994, with current
products
spanning geophysical data collection and analysis, through to printers
to
output geophysical data collected by sonar. We believe that our marine
geophysical survey markets are experiencing rapid growth due to:
1)
successful new product introductions in recent periods; 2)
market-proximity benefits derived from 2004 relocation to the United
States; 3) initial market penetration into new sub-sectors of the
marine
geophysical survey markets; 4) the high price of oil and gas in the
past
few years, resulting in unprecedented exploration and production
activity.
|
·
|
underwater
defense/ security, where we market to ports and harbors, state and
federal
government agencies and defense contractors. We started to focus
on this
market following the acquisition of OmniTech AS, a Norwegian Company,
in
December 2002, a company which had developed a prototype system,
the
Echoscope™,
a unique, patented instrument which permits accurate three-dimensional
visualization, measurement, data recording and mapping of underwater
objects. We have recently completed developing and commenced marketing
this first real time, high resolution, three-dimensional underwater
sonar
imaging device which we believe has particularly important applications
in
the fields of port security, defense and undersea oil and gas
development.
|
In
addition, through our two engineering services subsidiaries, Martech Systems
(Weymouth) Ltd, based in Weymouth, England, UK, and Colmek Systems Engineering,
based in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA , we provide engineering services to a wide
variety of clients in the subsea, defense, nuclear, government and
pharmaceutical industries. These engineering capabilities are increasingly
being
combined with our product offerings, bringing opportunities to provide complete
systems, installation and support.
16
For
the
foreseeable future, we intend to intensify our focus on port security. We
believe that in the post 9/11 era there are significant growth opportunities
available in that particular market segment because of increased government
expenditures aimed at enhancing security. Specifically, we believe that we
have
the ability to capitalize on this opportunity as a result of:
o |
First
mover advantage in 3-D sonar markets based on our patented technology,
our
research and development efforts and extensive and successful testing
in
this area that date back almost two decades as well as broad customer
acceptance.
|
o |
Early
recognition of need for 3-D real-time sonar in defense/security
applications.
|
o |
Expansion
into new geographies, such as North
America.
|
o |
Expansion
into new commercial markets, such as construction and dredging, with
innovative products.
|
o |
Recent
sole source classification for one of our products and its derivatives
by
certain government procurement
agencies.
|
Further,
we believe the Echoscope™ will transform certain segments of the sonar products
market. In addition, 3-D sonar, currently in the early stages of adoption,
has
disruptive technology qualities as it has the ability to change industry
standard practice in respect of the method for visualization and imaging of
underwater objects and environment. Therefore, it will likely change who the
suppliers into this market are as well as our market position and that of our
competitors. We believe the market opportunity in underwater security and
defense could grow at a rapid pace over the next several years.
Approximately
52% of our nine month 2008 revenues of $13,232,440 were attributable to pure
products business. The rest was attributable to our engineering businesses
at
Colmek and Martech, and a development contract with TSWG fulfilled through
our
corporate Research and Development division.
To
this
established base of business, we now plan to add other
sub-sections:
o |
we
are now starting to bid (sometimes in partnership, where areas
of focus
other than underwater sonar and wireless video surveillance capability
are
demanded) for complete port security and other solutions. We have
bid on a
small number of these in the last six months and hope for our first
successes shortly. We have not yet been awarded any contracts for
the
purchase of complete solutions. However, in March of 2008, we received
a
$1.6 million follow on order from the U.S. Department of Defense
to
deliver an additional next-generation Underwater Inspection System
(UIS)™
for TSWG and other potential users, to enable rapid underwater
searches in
the nation’s ports and waterways. In addition to the additional hardware
(we delivered four original units in December of 2007) TSWG has
committed
to a $1 million development project to help advance the product.
The
contract includes additional options which, if fully funded, would
require
us to deliver further UIS™ systems in fiscal 2009. The contract was
awarded to us on a sole source basis, which means that the product
is
considered to be available from one source only and under Federal
rules
may be acquired from that source without competitive bidding process.
Although this is not a complete port security system, it represents
the
first step towards achieving this.
|
o |
we
are currently reviewing the possibility of launching next year,
in
partnership with others, a services business based on our product
set.
This business will be port based and will, for example, provide
ship hull
inspections by way of rental of equipment and provision of a team
to
operate the equipment for any ship entering that particular
port.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
This
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
are
based on our consolidated financial statements that have been prepared under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP
requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported values of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
levels of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could
materially differ from those estimates.
Below
is
a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical to an
understanding of our financial condition and operating results and that may
require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters
which are inherently uncertain. A discussion of our significant accounting
policies, including further discussion of the accounting policies described
below, can be found in Note 3, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies"
of
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue
Recognition
We
record
revenue in accordance with the guidance of the SEC's Staff
Accounting Bulletin SAB No. 104
(SAB
104), which supersedes SAB
No. 101
in order
to encompass EITF
No. 00-21
,
Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
(EITF
00-21).
17
Revenue
is derived from sales of underwater technologies and equipment for imaging,
mapping, defense and survey applications. Revenue is also derived through
contracts gained by our Martech, Colmek and Innalogic businesses.
Revenue
is recognized when conclusive evidence of firm arrangement exists, delivery
has
occurred or services have been rendered, the contract price is fixed or
determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. No right of return
privileges are granted to customers after shipment.
For
arrangements with multiple deliverables, we recognize product revenue by
allocating the revenue to each deliverable based on the fair value of each
deliverable in accordance with EITF
No. 00-21
and SAB
No. 104, and recognize revenue for equipment upon delivery and for installation
and other services as performed. EITF No. 00-21 was effective for revenue
arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15,
2003.
Our
contracts typically require customer payments in advance of revenue recognition.
These deposit amounts are reflected as liabilities and recognized as revenue
when the Company has fulfilled its obligations under the respective
contracts.
Revenues
derived from our software license sales are recognized in accordance with
Statement of Position (SOP) SOP No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” and
SOP No. 98-9, “Modifications of SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition with
Respect to Certain Transactions”. For software license sales for which any
services rendered are not considered essential to the functionality of the
software, we recognize revenue upon delivery of the software, provided (1)
there
is evidence of an arrangement, (2) collection of our fee is considered probable
and (3) the fee is fixed and determinable.
Recoverability
of Deferred Costs
We
defer
costs on projects for service revenue. Deferred costs consist primarily of
direct and incremental costs to customize and install systems, as defined in
individual customer contracts, including costs to acquire hardware and software
from third parties and payroll costs for our employees and other third
parties.
We
recognize such costs in accordance with our revenue recognition policy by
contract. For revenue recognized under the completed contract method, costs
are
deferred until the products are delivered, or upon completion of services or,
where applicable, customer acceptance. For revenue recognized under the
percentage of completion method, costs are recognized as products are delivered
or services are provided in accordance with the percentage of completion
calculation. For revenue recognized ratably over the term of the contract,
costs
are recognized ratably over the term of the contract, commencing on the date
of
revenue recognition. At each balance sheet date, we review deferred costs,
to
ensure they are ultimately recoverable. Any anticipated losses on uncompleted
contracts are recognized when evidence indicates the estimated total cost of
a
contract exceeds its estimated total revenue.
Stock
Based Compensation
SFAS
No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” established and
encouraged the use of the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based
compensation arrangements under which compensation cost is determined using
the
fair value of stock-based compensation determined as of the date of the grant
or
the date at which the performance of the services is completed and is recognized
over the periods in which the related services are rendered. The statement
also
permitted companies to elect to continue using the current intrinsic value
accounting method specified in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion
No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” to account for
stock-based compensation to employees. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R)
we
elected to use the intrinsic value based method for grants to our employees
and
directors and have disclosed the pro forma effect of using the fair value based
method to account for our stock-based compensation to employees.
On
December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“Statement 123R”) which is a
revision of SFAS No. 123.
Statement
123R supersedes APB opinion No. 25 and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash
Flows”. Generally, the approach in Statement 123R is similar to the approach
described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123R requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro-forma
disclosure is no longer an alternative. This statement does not change the
accounting guidance for share based payment transactions with parties other
than
employees provided in SFAS No. 123(R). This statement does not address the
accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA
Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership
Plans.” On April 14, 2005, the SEC amended the effective date of the provisions
of this statement. The effect of this amendment by the SEC is that the Company
had to comply with Statement 123R and use the Fair Value based method of
accounting no later than the first quarter of 2006. We implemented SFAS
No. 123(R) on November 1, 2004 using the modified prospective method.
The fair value of each option grant issued after November 1, 2004 will be
determined as of grant date, utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The amortization of each option grant will be over the remainder of the vesting
period of each option grant. We use the fair value method for equity
instruments granted to non-employees and use the Black Scholes model for
measuring the fair value. The stock based fair value compensation is determined
as of the date of the grant or the date at which the performance of the services
is completed (measurement date) and is recognized over the periods in which
the
related services are rendered.
18
Income
Taxes
Deferred
income taxes are provided using the asset and liability method for financial
reporting purposes in accordance with the provisions of Statements of Financial
Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under this method, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between
the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying values for financial
reporting purposes, and for operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be removed or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment
date.
Purchase
price allocation and impairment of intangible and long-lived
assets
Intangible
and long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such
assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on
an
estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset,
and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for intangible
and long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the
fair value of the asset as estimated using a discounted cash flow
model.
We
measure the carrying value of goodwill recorded in connection with the
acquisitions for potential impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets”. To apply SFAS 142, a company is divided into
separate “reporting units”, each representing groups of products that are
separately managed. For this purpose, we have one reporting unit. To determine
whether or not goodwill may be impaired, a test is required at least annually,
and more often when there is a change in circumstances that could result in
an
impairment of goodwill. If the trading of our common stock is below book value
for a sustained period, or if other negative trends occur in our results of
operations, a goodwill impairment test will be performed by comparing book
value
to estimated market value. To the extent goodwill is determined to be impaired
an impairment charge is recorded in accordance with SFAS 142.
Introduction
The
third
quarter ending July 31, 2007 contained $1,521,675 of TSWG (US Coast Guard)
Revenues which had an unusual impact on that period. Comparisons will be
dramatically impacted by that anomaly. In fact, business with the Coast Guard
has continued but has not had as significant effect on quarterly revenues as
were realized in the third quarter of 2007.
Comparison
of Three Months Ended July 31, 2008 (“2008 Period”) to Three Months Ended July
31, 2007 (“2007 Period”)
Revenues.
Total
revenues for the 2008 period and the 2007 period were $5,008,525 and $5,859,907
respectively. This represented a decrease of $851,382 or 14.5%. The acquisition
of Colmek occurred on April 6, 2007 which makes the period to period comparisons
consistent for the first time without breaking out the subsidiary. This reflects
increased business in our products division specifically with regard to the
oil
and gas business in Europe, the construction business in the Middle East, the
US
Coast Guard continuing to purchase products and services, and a UIS™ (Underwater
Inspection System) sale to a law enforcement agency in the US. Alongside this
was a decrease in TSWG/USCG revenues, reflecting the current status of the
contract in each year.
Margins.
Gross
margins were 60.4% in the 2008 period compared with 60.7% for the 2007 period.
This was achieved with the increase in the sale of our signature products,
the
Echoscope™ and the UIS™, as well as the mix of traditional products which are
sold at higher margins and are becoming a dominant part of the revenue stream.
The engineering contracting business represented $1,772,894 or 35.4% of sales
with the products business attaining a level of $2,450,727 or 48.9% of revenues.
The company is targeting an average gross margin in the vicinity of 63% going
forward.
Research
and Development (R&D).
R&D
increased 39% to $880,339 in the 2008 period from $634,679 in 2007. This
reflects further development of the Echoscope™ and UIS™ tied to the TSWG (US
Coast Guard) contract, the initial stage of which finished in January, with
the
next stage having begun in March. Additionally, work commenced on the
development contract for the company’s new application which deploys the
Echoscope ™ for underwater construction. The company continues to invest in new
applications of its signature product.
19
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A).
SG&A expenses for the 2008 period decreased to $3,311,267 from $3,594,560 in
2007, or by 7.9%. However, the non-cash charges attributable to stock and option
compensation were $433,478 against $805,825 which brings SG&A for the 2008
Period to $2,786,391 against $2,788,735 for the 2007 Period, virtually static
year on year.
Key
areas
of expenditures include wages and salaries where the company spent $1,719,375
while the 2007 period was $1,534,028; legal and professional fees, including
accounting, audit and investment banking services, decreased to $241,928 in
2008
from $480,892 in 2007; travel increased to $186,297 from $127,283; rent
increased to $164,306 in 2008, from $148,376; and marketing increased to
$294,732 from $74,031 in 2007, mainly due to reclassification of
consultants.
Operating
Income/Loss.
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) for the
period, without non-cash charges for stock and options, were a loss of $467,141
against positive $246,164 for the 2007 Period. The company produced an operating
loss for the period of $1,167,795 (which, when adjusted for non-cash charges,
becomes $642,888) against a loss of $670,060 in 2007.
Interest
Expense.
Interest
expense for the period was $481,876, of which $383,571 was associated with
the
convertible debenture financing by the Royal Bank of Scotland. Interest expense
in 2007 was $561,350.
Preferred
Dividends.
During
the 2008 period there was a $31,819 dividend paid on the remaining series A
preferred stock versus $31,851 in 2007. All of the series B preferred stock
and
most of the series A preferred stock was converted to equity in April/May
2007.
Comparison
of Nine Months Ended July 31, 2008
(“2008 Period”) to the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2007 (“2007
Period”)
Introduction
Due
to
the acquisition of Colmek in April 2007, the financial information presented
for
Coda Octopus for the period ended July 31, 2007 (the "2007 Period"), includes
activity in Colmek from April 6 to the end of the period, combined with revenue,
other income and SG&A expenses of the rest of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. for
the period ending July 31, 2007. The financial information presented (“2007
Period") includes revenues and expenses for Colmek only for the period after
the
acquisition which occurred on April 6, 2007. As a result, the increased
revenues and expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
for the period in 2008 compared to those in 2007 may not be a meaningful
comparison.
Revenues.
Total
revenues for the 2008 Period and the 2007 Period were $13,232,440 and
$10,794,621 respectively, representing an increase of 22.6%. Contributions
from
Colmek were $1,709,014 in the 2007 period against $2,928,495 for 2008.
Subtracting the contribution from this acquisition to the 2008 and 2007 Periods,
there was a 13.4% increase in our original businesses. This was due to a strong
demand for our traditional products in the geophysical and hydrographic survey
markets as well as added traction in selling the UIS™ and
Echoscope™.
Gross
Margins.
Margins
were stronger in the 2008 Period at 62.7% compared with 58.2% for the 2007
period reflecting stronger sales in our traditional products business, a UIS™
sale to a US law enforcement agency and several Echoscopes™ sold to various
customers including three units sold into the construction market.
Research
and Development (R&D).
R&D
spending increased to $2,333,840 in the 2008 Period from $1,736,437 in the
2007
Period, an increase of 34.4%, as we continue to focus considerable effort into
enhancing the Echoscope™ and releasing other products in our suite of marine
geophysical offerings. In particular, work focused on delivering our Underwater
Inspection System (UIS™), a turnkey system built around the Echoscope™ platform
and further development work for the US Coast Guard on the UIS™ system.
Additionally, the company began development work on the project which deploys
the Echoscope™ in the underwater construction market.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A).
SG&A expenses for the 2008 Period increased to $9,170,389 (the costs for the
period include $1,323,029 in share compensation, amortization and depreciation
which are non-cash charges) from $8,883,099 during the 2007 Period,
an
increase of $287,290 or 3.2%. Some of the increase is attributable to the
acquisition of Colmek which was included for the entire period in
2008.
Key
areas
of expenditure include wages and salaries, where we spent $4,614,613 of our
SG&A costs (2007 Period was $3,736,218 ); legal and professional fees,
including accounting, audit and investment banking services, amounted to
$877,821(2007 Period was $1,169,935); travel costs increased to $418,687 in
2008
from $389,987 in 2007; rent for our various locations increased to $394,811
in
2008, from $390,526 in 2007; marketing increased to $905,794 in 2008 from
$200,459 in 2007, which included reclassification of certain consultants engaged
in sales of our signature products who were previously included in legal and
professional fees.
Other
Operating Expenses.
We
incurred other operating expenses of $435,000 in the 2007 Period for fees
incurred connected with equity fund raising. We incurred no comparable expenses
in the 2008 Period.
20
Operating
Loss.
The
EBITDA results for the 2008 period is a loss of $1,883,026, not including
non-cash charges for stock and options compensation, against a loss of
$4,570,217. As a result of the foregoing, the Company incurred a loss from
operations of $3,206,055 during the 2008 Period compared to a loss from
operations of $4,773,016 during the 2007 Period.
Interest
Expense.
Interest expense for the 2008 Period decreased to $1,051,181 (consisting of
accrued bond interest and factoring) from $6,349,946 during the 2007 Period.
Of
the 2007 amount, $5,544,445 was attributable to the valuation of warrants issued
as part of our financing, booked as a non-cash financing charge.
Dividends
and Other Stock Charges.
During
the 2008 Period, dividends of $106,843 were declared against $346,630 in the
2007 Period on preferred stock (most of the preferred stock was converted into
common stock during the 2007 Period). The 2007 amount includes $238,950 paid
on
the series A preferred stock and $107,680 on the series B preferred. In
addition, the 2007 Period included $800,000 in non-cash charges for the
beneficial conversion feature related to the issuance of series B preferred
stock in January 2007. This took the net loss applicable to common shares to
$12,196,051 or $0.34 per share for the 2007 Period, based on an average of
35,490,398 shares outstanding, compared to a loss of $4,267,300 or $0.09 per
share for the 2008 Period, based on an average of 48,369,873 shares
outstanding.
As
of
July 31, 2008 the Company had positive working capital of $10,892,026 and cash
totaling $6,050,996.
The
net
loss of $4,160,457 generated a cash flow deficit from operations of $4,117,784
in the 2008 Period, compared to $8,031,167 in 2007. During the 2008 Period,
we
also invested around $291,000 in tangible and intangible assets for use within
our various businesses, and completed the acquisition of Colmek for an outlay
of
a final amount of $763,936. During the 2008 Period, we raised $12M through
the
issuance of a convertible debenture in February 2008 (this was $10,453,421
after
the deduction of associated costs), which, combined with the cash flow uses
outlined above, resulted in a net cash flow into the company for the period
of
$5,134,739. The secured convertible debenture attracts interest at a rate of
8.5%, and has a conversion price of $1.05 per share callable after 2 years
at
$2.50, after 3 years at $2.90, and after 4 years at $3.50. The instrument is
redeemable after 7 years at 130%. The company feels that this funding will
enable the company to execute its plan over the next 12
months.
In
the
short term, our plan involves, specifically:
|
·
|
Continue
to sell our current range of products into a mixture of commercial,
defense and security markets, increasing sales of these products
over the
course of this financial year - we have seen strong growth over the
course
of the year so far.
|
|
·
|
Start
to sell complete turnkey systems based around our leading Echoscope™ 3-D
technology, to open markets in law enforcement and inspection - a
great
deal of our R&D expenditure has been directed towards refining our
product and completing sales this year that are currently in our
pipeline,
with first deliveries occurring in this financial
year.
|
|
·
|
Continue
to deliver to the Coast Guard on the contract we were awarded last
July.
Work on stage 2 began in the second quarter of this year and continues
until at least the end of the financial
year.
|
·
|
Deliver
on our first port security solution contract through the provision
of our
unique 3-D technology and other products and services, enabling us
to
provide complete solutions.
|
|
·
|
Leverage
our subsidiaries to take advantage of our lead in underwater sonar
technology by cross marketing all group products and services from
each
company.
|
|
·
|
Continue
to review and refocus our cost base where necessary to achieve a
cost
level commensurate with our current level of
activity.
|
Through
these measures, we aim to move from cash negative for last year and the first
quarter of this year to cash positive. We also aim to move from heavily
loss-making for the past 2 years to profitable for the coming year, prior to
any
non-cash charges made to our income statement. Although we intend to pursue
our
plans aggressively as set forth in the previous paragraph, there can be no
assurance that we will be successful in our attempt to make the company
profitable in the near future, or ever.
21
Inflation
and Foreign Currency
The
Company maintains its books in local currency: US Dollars for the parent holding
Company in the United States of America and the US operations, Pounds Sterling
for UK operations and Norwegian Kroner for Norwegian operations.
The
Company’s operations are primarily inside of the United States through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, though a significant proportion of revenues and
costs
are incurred outside of the US. As a result, fluctuations in currency exchange
rates may significantly affect the Company's sales, profitability and financial
position when the foreign currencies of its international operations are
translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting. In additional, we are
also
subject to currency fluctuation risk with respect to certain foreign currency
denominated receivables and payables. Although the Company cannot predict the
extent to which currency fluctuations may, or will, affect the Company's
business and financial position, there is a risk that such fluctuations will
have an adverse impact on the Company's sales, profits and financial position.
Because differing portions of our revenues and costs are denominated in foreign
currency, movements could impact our margins by, for example, decreasing our
foreign revenues when the dollar strengthens and not correspondingly decreasing
our expenses. The Company does not currently hedge its currency exposure. In
the
future, we may engage in hedging transactions to mitigate foreign exchange
risk.
It
is the
opinion of the Company that inflation has not had a material effect on its
operations.
Financing
Activities
Since
February 2005, we have raised approximately $36,724,289 in cash through the
issuance in private offerings at various times of shares of our common stock,
and units consisting of shares of preferred stock and warrants to purchase
common stock.
In
February 2005, we issued a total of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for
a
total cash consideration of $800,534.
In
October 2005, we issued a total of 15,000 Series A Preferred Stock (Sterling
Denominated), since converted into 2,655,000 shares of common stock, for a
total
cash consideration of £1,500,000 equivalent to approximately $2,655,000, based
upon a conversion ratio of $1.77 for each UK Pound at the time of the
investment.
On
April
30, 2006, we issued to one investor a total of 7,320.88 shares of our Series
A
Preferred Stock to a group of individual investors for total cash consideration
of £684,618.83 UK Pounds equivalent to $1,211,755 based upon a conversion ratio
of $1.77 for each UK Pound at the time of the investment.
From
June
2006 through January 2007, we issued to one institutional investor units
consisting 46,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock and four five year
warrants to purchase 9.2 million shares of our common stock at a price ranging
from $1.30 to $2.00 per share and 650,000 shares of our Common Stock for a
total
cash consideration of $4,600,000. Of these 46,000 shares of Series B Preferred
Stock, 18,181 were redeemed in April 2007 and the remaining shares were
converted into 2,781,900 shares of our common stock.
In
July
2006, we issued to two individual investors 820 shares of our Series A Preferred
Stock for a total cash consideration of $82,000. These have since been converted
into 820,000 shares of our common stock.
In
January 2007, we issued to one investor 3,000 shares of our Series B Preferred
Stock plus five-year warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock
at
$1.30 per share and five-year warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of our common
stock at $1.70 per share for a total cash consideration of $300,000. The 3,000
shares of Series B Preferred Stock have since been converted into 300,000 shares
of our common stock.
In
April
2007, we issued to an individual investor 25,000 shares of our common stock
plus
five-year warrants to purchase the same number of shares of common stock (of
which 12,500 may be purchased at $1.30 and the balance at $1.70 per share)
for a
total of $25,000.
During
April and May 2007, we issued to a group of investors a total of 15,000,000
shares of our common stock plus five-year warrants to purchase the same number
of shares of common stock (of which 7,500,000 may be purchased at $1.30 and
the
balance at $1.70 per share) for a total of $15,000,000.
In
February 2008, we issued $12 million of 8.50% secured convertible debentures.
This instrument is convertible into common stock at $1.05 per share. It is
callable by the company at $2.50 after two years, $2.90 after three years and
at
$3.50 after four years. It matures at 130% after seven years.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
do not
have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have
a
current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of
operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.
22
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As
of
July 31, 2008, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with
the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
not
effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our
periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified for each report and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Our
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have identified the following
material weaknesses as of July 31, 2008:
|
·
|
Insufficient
disclosure controls in that we have experienced insufficient communication
between the various subsidiaries and departments and a lack of timely
financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
·
|
Insufficient
accounting procedures relating to areas including: revenue booking,
inventory control, expense sign off procedures and shipping
documentation.
|
We
are in
the process of putting improved procedures in place to remedy the various
shortcomings in these areas.
(b)
Changes in Internal Controls.
There
was
no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this
Report.
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
There
were no material pending legal proceedings at July 31, 2008 to which the Company
or its subsidiaries is a party other that ordinary routine litigation incidental
to their respective businesses.
Not
Applicable
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Annual
stockholders meeting - July 1, 2008.
Directors elected: | Paul Nussbaum, Jason Reid, Rodney Peacock | |
Proposal
1:
|
(Directors):
for 37,858,466; Withheld 10,422.
|
|
Proposal
2:
|
(2008
Employees, Directors, Officers and Consultants Stock Option and Stock
Award Plan): For 29,156,123; Against 17,692; Abstained
18,024.
|
|
Proposal
3:
|
(Increase
Authorized Share Capital): for 37,815,604; Against 39,339; Abstained
13,962.
|
|
Proposal
4:
|
(Appointment
of Audition): For 37,753,803; Against 10,015; Abstained
105,091.
|
Item
5. Other Information
None
Item
6. Exhibits
31
|
Certifications
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
Coda
Octopus Group, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
September 15, 2008
|
|
/s/ Jason
Reid
|
|
Jason
Reid
|
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Date:
September 15, 2008
|
|
/s/ Jody
E. Frank
|
|
Jody
Frank
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
24