COFFEE HOLDING CO INC - Annual Report: 2006 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
Form
10-K
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ____________ to ____________.
Commission
file No. 333-00588-NY
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
11-2238111
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
4401
First Avenue, Brooklyn, New York
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
11232-0005
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (718)
832-0800
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class:
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered:
|
Common
Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share
|
American
Stock Exchange
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None
Indicate
by check mark if registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark if registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the
past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained in, to the
best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
Yes
o
No
x
The
aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the
registrant, computed by reference to the closing price of the registrant’s
common stock on the American Stock Exchange on April 28, 2006, was
$14,807,062.
As
of
December 29, 2006, the registrant had 5,529,830 shares of common stock, par
value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
Documents
incorporated by Reference
Portions
of the registrant’s proxy statement for the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders
to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after registrant’s fiscal
year ended October 31, 2006, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K.
PAGE
|
||||
PART
I
|
||||
ITEM
1.
|
BUSINESS
|
1
|
||
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
10
|
||
ITEM
1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
16
|
||
ITEM
2.
|
PROPERTIES
|
16
|
||
ITEM
3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
16
|
||
ITEM
4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
16
|
||
PART
II
|
||||
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
17
|
||
ITEM
6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
18
|
||
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION
|
19
|
||
ITEM
7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
27
|
||
ITEM
8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
27
|
||
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
27
|
||
ITEM
9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
28
|
||
ITEM
9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
28
|
||
PART
III
|
||||
ITEM
10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
29
|
||
ITEM
11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
29
|
||
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
29
|
||
ITEM
13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
29
|
||
ITEM
14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
30
|
||
ITEM
15.
|
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
31
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
32
|
|||
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
F-1
|
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
General
Overview
Products
and Operations.
We are
an integrated wholesale coffee roaster and dealer in the United States. Our
core
products can be divided into three categories:
· |
Wholesale
Green Coffee:
unroasted raw beans imported from around the world and sold to large
and
small roasters and coffee shop
operators;
|
· |
Private
Label Coffee:
coffee roasted, blended, packaged and sold under the specifications
and
names of others, including supermarkets that want to have their own
brand
name on coffee to compete with national brands;
and
|
· |
Branded
Coffee:
coffee roasted and blended to our own specifications and packaged
and sold
under our seven brand names in different segments of the
market.
|
Our
private label and branded coffee products are sold throughout the United States
and Canada to supermarkets, wholesalers, and individually owned and multi-unit
retail customers. Our unprocessed green coffee, which includes over 70 types
of
coffee from all over the world, is sold to specialty gourmet
roasters.
We
conduct our operations in accordance with strict freshness and quality
standards. All of our private label and branded coffee is produced from high
quality coffee beans that are deep roasted for full flavor using a slow roasting
process that has been perfected utilizing our more than thirty years of
experience in the coffee industry. In order to ensure freshness, our products
are delivered to our customers within 72 hours of roasting. We believe that
our
long history has enabled us to develop a loyal customer base.
We
were
founded and incorporated in New York State in 1971 and have been a family
operated business for over 30 years. In 1998, we merged with Transpacific
International Group Corp. and became a Nevada corporation. In May 2005, we
concluded our initial public offering and our common stock began trading on
the
American Stock Exchange under the symbol “JVA.” Our fiscal year ends on October
31.
Our
corporate offices are located at 4401 First Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11232.
Our telephone number is (718) 832-0800 and our website address is
www.coffeeholding.com.
Our
Competitive Strengths
To
achieve our growth objectives described below, we intend to leverage the
following competitive strengths:
National
Distribution with Capacity For Growth. From
1991
to 2004, we expanded our distribution to a national platform while operating
from only our East Coast location by making capital investments to improve
our
roasting, packaging and fulfillment infrastructure to support the production
and
distribution of large quantities of fresh coffee products throughout the United
States. In February 2004, we acquired certain assets of Premier Roasters, a
roaster-dealer located in La Junta, Colorado, for $825,000. The assets purchased
by us include all of the operating equipment located at Premier Roasters’ La
Junta and Rocky Ford, Colorado locations, as well as all labels for all of
Premier Roasters’ coffee products. In connection with the acquisition of these
assets, we reached an agreement with the City of La Junta, Colorado on a 20-year
lease for a 50,000 square foot facility in La Junta. We are using the assets
that we purchased to expand our integrated wholesale coffee roaster and dealer
operations in the Western United States. By operating out of two facilities,
we
have gained new economies of scale in both manufacturing and logistical
efficiencies and are confident that we can compete aggressively throughout
the
United States. These two facilities allow us to reduce our freight and shipping
costs to the Western United States, thereby enabling us to be more competitive
in bidding for new business. In addition, our presence in Colorado has increased
the number of potential customers we have because of our proximity to the West
Coast.
1
In
March
2006, we entered into a joint venture with Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting LLC
and
formed Café La Rica, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The joint
venture engages in the roasting, packaging and sale of the Café La Rica brand
coffee and other branded and food service coffee products in Miami, Florida.
We
own 50% of the joint venture and are the primary supplier of its coffee
inventory. In April 2006, the Company and Caruso's Coffee of Brecksville, Ohio
and formed Generations Coffee Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, which will engage in the roasting, packaging and sale of private label
specialty coffee products. We own 60% of the joint venture and are the exclusive
supplier of its coffee inventory. We believe that the Generations Coffee joint
venture will allow us to bid on the private label gourmet whole bean business
we
have not been equipped to pursue from an operational standpoint in the past.
With this specialty roasting facility in place, in many cases right in the
backyard of our most important wholesale and retail customers, we believe that
we are in an ideal position to combine our current canned private label business
with high-end private label specialty whole bean business. High-end specialty
whole bean coffee sells for as much as three times more per pound than the
canned coffees in which we currently specialize.
Positioned
to Profitably Grow Through Varying Cycles of the Coffee Market.
We
believe that we are one of the few coffee companies to offer a broad array
of
branded and private label roasted ground coffees and wholesale green coffee
across the spectrum of consumer tastes, preferences and price points. While
many
of our competitors engage in distinct segments of the coffee business, we sell
products in each of the following areas:
· |
Retail
branded coffee;
|
· |
Retail
private label coffee
|
· |
Wholesale
specialty green and gourmet whole bean
coffees;
|
· |
Food
service;
|
· |
Instant
coffees; and
|
· |
Niche
products.
|
Our
branded and private label roasted ground coffees are sold predominantly at
competitive and value price levels while some of our other branded and specialty
coffees are sold predominantly at the premium price levels. Premium price level
coffee is high-quality gourmet coffee, such as AA Arabica coffee, which sells
at
a substantial premium over traditional retail canned coffee, while competitive
and value price level coffee is mainstream or traditional canned coffee. Because
of this diversification, we believe that our profitability is not dependent
on
any one area of the coffee industry and, therefore, is less sensitive than
our
competition to potential coffee commodity price and overall economic
volatility.
2
Wholesale
Green Coffee Market Presence.
As a
large roaster/dealer of green coffee, we believe that we are favorably
positioned to increase our specialty coffee sales. Since 1998, we have increased
the number of our wholesale green coffee customers, including coffee houses,
single store operators, mall coffee stores and mail order sellers, by 93% from
150 to 290. We are a charter member of the Specialty Coffee Association of
America and one of the largest distributors of Swiss Water Processed
Decaffeinated Coffees along the East Coast. In addition, although we do not
have
any formalized, material agreements or long-term contracts with it, we have
a
16-year relationship with Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, our largest wholesale
green coffee customer. Our 30-plus years of experience as a roaster and a dealer
of green coffee allows us to provide our roasting experience as a value added
service to our gourmet roaster customers. The assistance we provide to our
customers includes training, coffee blending and market identification. We
believe that our relationships with wholesale green coffee customers and our
focus on selling green coffee as a wholesaler has enabled us to participate
in
the growth of the specialty coffee market while mitigating the risks associated
with the competitive retail specialty coffee environment.
Diverse
Portfolio of Differentiated Branded Coffees. Currently,
our highest net profit margin is on our branded coffees. We have amassed a
portfolio of five proprietary name brands sold to supermarkets, wholesalers
and
individually-owned stores in the United States, including brands for specialty
espresso, Latin espresso, Italian espresso, 100% Colombian coffee and blended
coffee. In addition, we have entered into a licensing agreement with Del Monte
Corporation for the exclusive right to use the S&W and IL CLASSICO
trademarks in the United States and other countries approved by Del Monte
Corporation in connection with the production, manufacture and sale of roasted
whole bean and ground coffee for distribution to retail customers. We plan
to
broaden our customer base and increase penetration with existing customers
by
expanding the S&W label from a well-known brand on the West Coast to a
well-known brand throughout the United States. Our existing portfolio of
differentiated brands combined with our management expertise serve as a platform
to add additional name brands through acquisition or licensing agreements which
target product niches and segments that do not compete with our existing brands.
Management
Has Extensive Experience in the Coffee Industry.
We have
been a family operated business for three generations. Throughout this time,
we
have remained profitable through varying cycles in the coffee industry and
the
economy. Andrew Gordon, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, and David Gordon, our Executive Vice President - Operations,
have worked with Coffee Holding for 24 and 26 years, respectively. David Gordon
is an original member of the Specialty Coffee Association of America. We believe
that our employees and management are dedicated to our vision and mission,
which
is to produce high quality products, as well as to provide quality and
responsive service to our customers.
Our
Growth Strategy
We
believe that significant growth opportunities exist by selectively pursuing
strategic acquisitions and alliances, targeting the rapidly growing Hispanic
market in the United States, increasing penetration with existing customers
by
adding new products, and developing our food service business. By capitalizing
on this strategy, we hope to continue to grow our business with our commitment
to quality and personalized service to our customers. We do not intend to
compete on price alone nor do we intend to expand sales at the expense of
profitability.
3
Selectively
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Alliances.
We
intend to expand our operations by acquiring coffee companies, seeking strategic
alliances and acquiring or licensing brands which complement our business
objectives. Consistent with this strategy, in February 2004, we acquired certain
assets of Premier Roasters and entered into a licensing agreement with Del
Monte
Corporation for the exclusive right to use the S&W and IL CLASSICO
trademarks, including Premium, Premium Decaf, French Roast, Colombian, Colombian
Decaf, Swiss Water Decaf, Kona, and Mellow'd Roast lines, in the United States
and other countries approved by Del Monte Corporation in connection with the
production, manufacture and sale of roasted whole bean and ground coffee for
distribution at the retail level.
In
March
2006, we entered into a joint venture with Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting LLC
and
formed Café La Rica, LLC. The joint venture engages in the roasting, packaging
and sale of the Café La Rica brand coffee and other branded and food service
coffee products in Miami, Florida. In April 2006, we entered into a joint
venture with Caruso’s Coffee of Brecksville, Ohio and formed Generations Coffee
Company, LLC, which will engage in the roasting, packaging and sale of private
label specialty coffee products. We intend to further expand the market presence
of our branded products outside our primary Northeastern United States market
through other acquisitions and strategic alliances as opportunities
arise.
Grow
Our Café
Caribe
Product. The
Hispanic population in the United States is growing at nine times the average
rate and now represents the largest minority demographic in the United States,
according to 2000 census data. We believe there is significant opportunity
for
our Café Caribe brand to gain market share among Hispanic consumers in the
United States. Café Caribe, which has historically been our leading brand by
revenue, is a specialty espresso coffee that targets espresso coffee drinkers
and, in particular, Hispanic consumers.
Further
Market Penetration of Our Niche Products.
We
intend to capture additional market share through our existing distribution
channels by selectively adding or introducing new brand names and products
across multiple price points, including:
· |
Specialty
blends;
|
· |
Private
label “value” blends and trial-sized mini-brick
packages;
|
· |
Specialty
instant coffees;
|
· |
Instant
cappuccinos and hot chocolates; and
|
· |
Tea
line products.
|
In
2004,
we established relationships with additional independent sales brokers to market
our products on a national scale.
Develop
Our Food Service Business.
We plan
to expand further into the food service business by developing new distribution
channels for our products. Currently, we have a limited presence in the food
service market. In 2003, we began marketing our upscale restaurant and Colombian
coffee brands to hotels, restaurants, office coffee services companies and
other
food service retailers. In addition, we have expanded our food service offerings
to include instant cappuccinos, tea products and an equipment program for our
customers. We attend at least ten annual trade shows held by various buying
groups which provide us a national audience to market our food service products.
4
Our
Core Products
Our
core
products can be divided into three categories:
· |
Wholesale
Green Coffee: unroasted
raw beans imported from around the world and sold to large and small
roasters and coffee shop operators;
|
· |
Private
Label Coffee: coffee
roasted, blended, packaged and sold under the specifications and
names of
others, including supermarkets that want to have their own brand
name on
coffee to compete with national brands;
and
|
· |
Branded
Coffee:
coffee roasted and blended to our own specifications and sold under
our
seven brand names in different segments of the
market.
|
Wholesale
Green Coffee.
The
specialty green coffee market represents the fastest growing area of our
industry. The number of gourmet coffee houses have been increasing in all areas
of the United States. The growth in specialty coffee sales has created a
marketplace for higher quality and differentiated products which can be priced
at a premium in the marketplace. As a large roaster/dealer of green coffee,
we
are favorably positioned to increase our specialty coffee sales. We sell green
coffee beans to small roasters and coffee shop operators located throughout
the
United States and carry over 70 different varieties. Specialty green coffee
beans are sold unroasted, direct from warehouses to small roasters and gourmet
coffee shop operators which then roast the beans themselves. We sell from as
little as one bag (132 pounds) to a full truckload (44,000 pounds) depending
on
the size and need of the customer. We believe that we can increase sales of
wholesale green coffee without venturing into the highly competitive retail
specialty coffee environment and that we can be as profitable or more profitable
than our competition in this segment by selling “one bag at a time” rather than
“one cup at a time.”
Private
Label Coffee.
We
roast, blend, package and sell coffee under private labels for companies
throughout the United States and Canada. Our private label coffee is sold in
cans, brick packages and instants in a variety of sizes. As
of
October 31, 2006, we supplied coffee under approximately 47 different labels
to
wholesalers and retailers, including Supervalu, C&S Wholesale and Nash
Finch, three of the largest grocery wholesalers in North America according
to
Private
Label Magazine. We
produce private label coffee for customers who desire to sell coffee under
their
own name but do not want to engage in the manufacturing process. Our private
label customers seek a quality similar to the national brands at a lower cost,
which represents a better value for the consumer.
Branded
Coffee.
We roast
and blend our branded coffee according to our own recipes and package the coffee
at our facilities in Brooklyn, New York and La Junta, Colorado. We then sell
the
packaged coffee under our brand labels to supermarkets, wholesalers and
individually owned stores throughout the United States.
We
hold
trademarks for each of our proprietary name brands and have the exclusive right
to use the S&W and IL CLASSICO trademarks in the United States in connection
with the production, manufacture and sale of roasted whole bean and ground
coffee for distribution at the retail level. For further information regarding
our trademark rights, see “Business-Trademarks.”
Each
of
our name brands is directed at a particular segment of the coffee market. Our
branded coffees are:
· |
Café
Caribe is
a specialty espresso coffee that targets espresso coffee drinkers
and, in
particular, the Hispanic consumer market;
|
5
· |
S&W
is
an upscale canned coffee established in 1921 and includes Premium,
Premium
Decaf, French Roast, Colombian, Colombian Decaf, Swiss Water Decaf,
Kona,
Mellow'd Roast and IL CLASSICO
lines;
|
· |
Café
Supremo is
a specialty espresso that targets espresso drinkers of all backgrounds
and
tastes. It is designed to introduce coffee drinkers to the tastes
of dark
roasted coffee;
|
· |
Don
Manuel
is
produced from the finest 100% Colombian coffee beans. Don Manuel
is an
upscale quality product which commands a substantial premium compared
to
the more traditional brown coffee blends. We also use this known
trademark
in our food service business because of the high brand
quality;
|
· |
Fifth
Avenue
is
a blended coffee that has become popular as an alternative for consumers
who purchase private label or national branded coffee. We also market
this
brand to wholesalers who do not wish to undertake the expense of
developing a private label coffee program under their own
name;
|
· |
Via
Roma
is
an Italian espresso targeted at the more traditional espresso drinker;
and
|
· |
Il
CLASSICO
is
an S&W brand espresso product.
|
Other
Products
We
also
offer several niche products, including:
· |
trial-sized
mini-brick coffee packages;
|
· |
specialty
instant coffees;
|
· |
instant
cappuccinos and hot chocolates; and
|
· |
tea
line products.
|
Raw
Materials
Coffee
is
a commodity traded on the Commodities and Futures Exchange subject to price
fluctuations. Over the past five years, the average price per pound of coffee
beans ranged from approximately $0.43 to $1.45. The price for coffee beans
on
the commodities market as of October 31, 2006 was $1.08 per pound. Specialty
green coffee, unlike most coffee, is not tied directly to the commodities cash
markets. Instead, it tends to trade on a negotiated basis at a substantial
premium over commodity coffee pricing, depending on the origin, supply and
demand at the time of purchase. We are a licensed Fair Trade dealer of Fair
Trade certified coffee. Fair Trade certified coffee helps small coffee farmers
to increase their incomes and improve the prospects of their communities and
families by guaranteeing farmers a minimum price of five cents above the current
market price. Although we may purchase Fair Trade certified coffee from time
to
time, we are not obligated to do so and we do not have any commitments to
purchase Fair Trade certified coffee. All of our specialty green coffees, as
well as all of the other coffees we import for roasting, are subject to multiple
levels of quality control.
We
purchase our green coffee from dealers located primarily within the United
States. The dealers supply us with coffee beans from many countries, including
Colombia, Mexico, Kenya, Indonesia, Brazil and Uganda. In fiscal 2006,
substantially all of our green coffee purchases were from ten suppliers,
which accounted for approximately $35.3 million, or 77% of our total product
purchases. One of these suppliers, Rothfos Corporation, accounted
for approximately
$13.8 million, or 30% of our total product purchases. An employee of Rothfos
Corporation is one of our directors. Another of these suppliers, Atlantic (USA)
Inc., accounted for approximately $4.8 million, or 10%
of
our total product purchases. We do not have any formalized, material agreements
or long-term contracts with any of these suppliers. Rather, our purchases are
typically made pursuant to individual purchase orders. We do not believe that
the loss of any one supplier, including Rothfos, would have a material adverse
effect on our operations due to the availability of alternate
suppliers.
6
The
supply and price of coffee beans are subject to volatility and are influenced
by
numerous factors which are beyond our control. Supply and price can be affected
by factors such as weather, politics and economics in the coffee exporting
countries. Increases in the cost of coffee beans can, to a certain extent,
be
passed on to our customers in the form of higher prices for coffee beans and
processed coffee. Drastic or prolonged increases in coffee prices could also
adversely impact our business as it could lead to a decline in overall
consumption of coffee. Similarly, rapid decreases in the cost of coffee beans
could force us to lower our sale prices before realizing cost reductions in
our
purchases.
We
subject all of our private unroasted green coffee to both a pre-shipment sample
approval and an additional sample approval upon arrival into the United States.
Once the arrival sample is approved, we then bring the coffee to one of our
facilities to roast and blend according to our own strict specifications. During
the roasting and blending process, samples are pulled off the production line
and tested on an hourly basis to ensure that each batch roasted is consistent
with the others and meets the strict quality standards demanded by our customers
and us.
Our
Use of Derivatives
Historically,
we have used short-term coffee futures and options contracts primarily for
the
purpose of partially hedging and minimizing the effects of changing green coffee
prices. We acquire futures contracts with longer terms (generally three to
four
months) primarily for the purpose of guaranteeing an adequate supply of green
coffee. The use of these derivative financial instruments has enabled us to
mitigate the effect of changing prices although we generally remain exposed
to
loss when prices decline significantly in a short period of time or remain
at
higher levels, preventing us from obtaining inventory at favorable prices.
We
generally have been able to pass green coffee price increases through to
customers, thereby maintaining our gross profits. However, we cannot predict
whether we will be able to pass inventory price increases through to our
customers in the future. See “Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk-Commodity Price
Risks.”
Trademarks
We
hold
trademarks, registered with the United States Office of Patent and Trademark,
for all five of our proprietary coffee brands and an exclusive license for
S&W and IL CLASSICO brands for sale in the United States. Trademark
registrations are subject to periodic renewal and we anticipate maintaining
our
registrations. We believe that our brands are recognizable in the marketplace
and that brand recognition is important to the success of our branded coffee
business.
Customers
We
sell
our private label and our branded coffee to three of the largest wholesalers
in
the United States (according to Supermarket News) and are the exclusive coffee
supplier for Supervalu and Nash Finch Co., the largest and fourth largest
wholesalers in the United States.
We sell
wholesale green coffee to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters. Sales to Supervalu,
Topco/Shurfine and Green Mountain Coffee Roasters accounted for approximately
$3.2 million, or 6%, $3.0 million, or 6%, and $15.8 million, or 31% of our
net
sales for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 and $3.0 million, or 8%, $2.7
million, or 6%, and 11.3 million or 28%, for the fiscal year ended October
31,
2005, respectively.
7
Although
our agreements with wholesale customers generally contain only pricing terms,
our contracts with certain customers, including Supervalu, also contain minimum
and maximum purchase obligations at fixed prices. Because our profits on a
fixed-price contract could decline if coffee prices increased, we acquire
futures contracts with longer terms (generally three to four months) primarily
for the purpose of guaranteeing an adequate supply of green coffee at favorable
prices. Although the use of these derivative financial instruments has enabled
us to mitigate the effect of changing prices, no strategy is effective to
eliminate the pricing risks and we generally remain exposed to loss when prices
change significantly in a short period of time, and we generally remain exposed
to supply risk in the event of non-performance by the counter-parties to any
futures contracts.
Marketing
We
market
our private label and wholesale coffee through trade shows, industry
publications, face-to-face contact and through the use of our internal sales
force and non-exclusive independent food and beverage sales brokers. We also
use
our web site (www.coffeeholding.com) as a method of marketing our coffee
products and ourselves.
For
our
private label and branded coffees, we will, from time to time in conjunction
with retailers and with wholesalers, conduct in-store promotions, such as
product demonstrations, coupons, price reductions, two-for-one sales and new
product launches to capture changing consumer taste preference for upscale
canned coffees.
We
evaluate opportunities for growth consistent with our business objectives.
We
have established relationships with independent sales brokers to market our
products in the Western United States, an area of the country where we have
not
had a high penetration of sales. We have also hired a Florida sales manager
to
increase our private label and branded coffee sales in Florida. In addition,
we
employ a West Coast Brand Manager who markets our S&W and IL CLASSICO
brands, as well as our other branded and private label coffee products. We
intend to capture additional market share in our existing distribution channels
by selectively adding or introducing new brand names and products across
multiple price points, including niche specialty blends, private label “value”
blends and mini-brick, filter packages, instant cappuccinos and tea line
products. We also intend to add specialty instant coffees to our extensive
line
of instant coffee products.
Charitable
Activities
We
are
also a supporter of several coffee oriented charitable
organizations.
· |
For
over 12 years, we have been members of Coffee Kids, an international
non-profit organization that helps to improve the quality of life
of
children and their families in coffee-growing communities in Mexico,
Guatemala, Nicaragua and Costa
Rica.
|
· |
We
are members of Grounds for Health, an organization that educates,
screens,
and arranges treatment for women who have cancer and live in the
rural
coffee growing communities of
Mexico.
|
· |
We
are a licensed Fair Trade dealer of Fair Trade certified coffee.
Fair
Trade helps small coffee farmers to increase their incomes and improve
the
prospects of their communities and families. It guarantees farmers
a
minimum price of $1.26 per pound or five cents above the current
market
price.
|
8
· |
Most
recently, we are the administrative benefactors to a new non-profit
organization called Cup for Education. After discovering the lack
of
schools, teachers, and basic fundamental learning supplies in the
poor
coffee growing communities of Central and Latin America, “Cup” was
established by our employee, Karen Gordon, to help build schools,
sponsor
teachers, and purchase basic supplies such as books, chalk and other
necessities for a proper education.
|
Competition
The
coffee market is highly competitive. We compete in the following areas:
Wholesale
Green Coffee.
There
are many green coffee dealers throughout the United States. Many of these
dealers have greater financial resources than we do. However, we believe that
we
have both the knowledge and the capability to assist small specialty gourmet
coffee roasters with developing and growing their business. Our 30-plus years
of
experience as a roaster and a dealer of green coffee allows us to provide our
roasting experience as a value added service to our gourmet roaster customers.
While other coffee merchants may be able to offer lower prices for coffee beans,
we market ourselves as a value-added supplier to small roasters, with the
ability to help them market their specialty coffee products and develop a
customer base. The assistance we provide our customers includes training, coffee
blending and market identification. Because specialty green coffee beans are
sold unroasted to small coffee shops and roasters that market their products
to
local gourmet customers, we do not believe that our specialty green coffee
customers compete with our private label or branded coffee lines of
business.
Private
Label Competition.
There
are several major producers of coffee for private label sale in the United
States. Many other companies produce coffee for sale on a regional basis. Our
main competitors are The Kroger Co. and the former coffee division of Sara
Lee
Corporation which was recently purchased by Segafredo Zanetti Group. Both The
Kroger Co. and the former Sara Lee division are larger and have more financial
and other resources than we do and therefore are able to devote more resources
to product development and marketing. We believe that we remain competitive
by
providing a high level of quality and customer service. This service includes
ensuring that the coffee produced for each label maintains a consistent taste
and is delivered on time and in the proper quantities. In addition, we provide
our private label customers with information on the coffee market on a regular
basis.
Branded
Competition.
Our
proprietary brand coffees compete with many other brands that are sold in
supermarkets and specialty stores, primarily in the Northeastern United States.
The branded coffee market in both the Northeast and elsewhere is dominated
by
three large companies: Kraft General Foods, Inc., The Procter & Gamble
Company and the former coffee division of Sara Lee Corporation which was
recently purchased by Segafredo Zanetti Group, who also market specialty coffee
in addition to non-specialty coffee. Our large competitors have greater access
to capital and a greater ability to conduct marketing and promotions. We believe
that, while our competitors’ brands may be more nationally recognizable, our
Café Caribe brand is competitive in the fast growing Hispanic demographic and
our S&W brand has been a popular and recognizable brand on the West Coast
for over 80 years.
Government
Regulation
Our
coffee roasting operations are subject to various governmental laws and
regulations, which require us to obtain licenses, relating to customs, health
and safety, building and land use, and environmental protection. Our roasting
facility is subject to state and local air-quality and emissions regulation.
If
we encounter difficulties in obtaining any necessary licenses or if we have
difficulty complying with these laws and regulations, then we could be subject
to fines and penalties which could have a material adverse effect on our
profitability. In addition, our product offerings could be limited, thereby
reducing our revenues.
9
We
believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all such laws
and regulations and that we have obtained all material licenses and permits
that
are required for the operation of our business. We are not aware of any
environmental regulations that have or that we believe will have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
Employees
We
have
79 full-time employees, 59 of whom are employed in the areas of coffee roasting,
blending and packaging and 20 of whom are in administration and sales. None
of
our employees are represented by unions or collective bargaining agreements.
Our
management believes that we maintain a good working relationship with our
employees. To supplement our internal sales staff, we sometimes use independent
national and regional sales brokers who work on a commission basis.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
An
investment in our common stock is subject to risks inherent in our business.
Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks
and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information
included in this report. In addition to the risks and uncertainties described
below, other risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. The value or market
price of our common stock could decline due to any of these identified or other
risks, and you could lose all of your investment.
Risk
Factors Affecting Our Company
Because
our business is highly dependent upon a single commodity, coffee, any decrease
in demand for coffee could materially adversely affect our revenues and
profitability.
Our
business is centered on essentially one commodity: coffee. Our operations have
primarily focused on the following areas of the coffee industry:
· |
the
roasting, blending, packaging and distribution of private label coffee;
|
· |
the
roasting, blending, packaging and distribution of proprietary branded
coffee; and
|
· |
the
sale of wholesale specialty green coffee.
|
Demand
for our products is affected by:
· |
consumer
tastes and preferences;
|
· |
national,
regional and local economic conditions;
|
· |
demographic
trends; and
|
· |
the
type, number and location of competing products.
|
10
Because
we rely on a single commodity, any decrease in demand for coffee would harm
our
business more than if we had more diversified product offerings and could
materially adversely affect our revenues and operating results.
If
we are unable to geographically expand our branded and private label products,
our growth will be impeded which could result in reduced sales and
profitability. Our
business strategy emphasizes, among other things, geographic expansion of our
branded and private label products as opportunities arise. We may not be able
to
implement successfully this portion of our business strategy. Our ability to
implement this portion of our business strategy is dependent on our ability
to:
· |
market
our products on a national scale;
|
· |
increase
our brand recognition on a national scale;
|
· |
enter
into distribution and other strategic arrangements with third party
retailers; and
|
· |
manage
growth in administrative overhead and distribution costs likely to
result
from the planned expansion of our distribution channels.
|
Our
sales
and profitability may be adversely affected if we fail to successfully expand
the geographic distribution of our branded and private label products. In
addition, our expenses could increase and our profits could decrease as we
implement our growth strategy.
If
our hedging policy is not effective, we may not be able to control our coffee
costs, we may be forced to pay greater than market value for green coffee and
our profitability may be reduced. The
supply and price of coffee beans are subject to volatility and are influenced
by
numerous factors which are beyond our control. Historically, we have used
short-term coffee futures and options contracts for the purpose of hedging
the
effects of changing green coffee prices. In addition, during the latter half
of
fiscal 2000, we began to acquire futures contracts with longer terms, generally
three to four months, for the purpose of guaranteeing an adequate supply of
green coffee. Realized and unrealized gains or losses on futures contracts
are
accounted for in cost of sales. Gains on futures contracts reduce cost of sales
and losses on futures contracts increase cost of sales. Although we had net
gains on futures contracts for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, we have incurred losses on futures contracts during some past
reporting periods, which could materially increase our cost of sales and
materially decrease our profitability and adversely affect our stock
price.
Although
the use of these derivative financial instruments has generally enabled us
to
mitigate the effect of changing prices, no strategy is effective to eliminate
the pricing risks and we generally remain exposed to loss on futures contracts
when prices decline significantly in a short period of time, and we generally
remain exposed to supply risk in the event of non-performance by the
counter-parties to any futures contracts. Although, historically, we generally
have been able to pass green coffee price increases through to customers,
thereby maintaining our gross profits, we may not be able to pass price
increases through to our customers in the future. Our hedging strategy and
the
hedges that we enter into may not adequately offset the risks of coffee bean
price volatility and our hedges may result in losses. Failure to properly design
and implement an effective hedging strategy may materially adversely affect
our
business and operating results. In this case, our costs of sales may increase,
resulting in a decrease in profitability.
Our
revenues and profitability could be adversely affected if our joint ventures
are
not successful.
In March
2006, we entered into a joint venture with Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting LLC
and
formed Café La Rica, LLC. The joint venture engages in the roasting, packaging
and sale of the Café La Rica brand coffee and other branded and food service
coffee products in Miami, Florida. In April 2006, we entered into a joint
venture with Caruso's Coffee of Brecksville, Ohio and formed Generations Coffee
Company, LLC, which will engage in the roasting, packaging and sale of private
label specialty coffee products. To date, Generations Coffee Company has engaged
in limited operations. During 2006, Café La Rica incurred a loss of $176,911.
While we believe the loss by Café La Rica is consistent with the typical initial
performance of a start-up venture of this type, continued losses will hurt
our
profitability.
11
In
addition, we generally will not be in a position to exercise sole
decision-making authority regarding these joint ventures. Investments in joint
ventures may under certain circumstances, involve risks not present when a
third-party is not involved, including the possibility that joint venture
partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of the required
capital contributions. Joint venture partners may have business interests,
strategies or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests,
strategies or goals and may be in cases where we have a minority interest will
be, in a position to take actions contrary to our policies, strategies or
objectives. Joint venture investments also entail a risk of impasse on
decisions, because neither we nor our joint venture partner would have full
control over the joint venture. Any disputes that may arise between us and
our
joint venture partners may result in litigation or arbitration that could
increase our expenses and could prevent our officers and/or directors from
focusing their time and effort exclusively on our business strategies. In
addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our
third-party joint venture partners.
Any
inability to successfully implement our strategy of growth through selective
acquisitions, licensing arrangements and other strategic alliances could
materially affect our revenues and profitability. Our
strategy of growth through the selective acquisition of coffee companies, the
selective acquisition or licensing of additional coffee brands and other
strategic alliances presents risks that could result in increased expenditures
and could materially adversely affect our revenues and profitability,
including:
· |
such
acquisitions, licensing arrangements or other strategic alliances
may
divert our management’s attention from our existing
operations;
|
· |
we
may not be able to successfully integrate any acquired coffee companies
or
new coffee brands into our existing
business;
|
· |
we
may not be able to manage the contingent risks associated with the
past
operations of, and other unanticipated problems arising in, any acquired
coffee company; and
|
· |
we
may not be able to control unanticipated costs associated with such
acquisitions, licensing arrangements or strategic
alliances.
|
In
addition, any such acquisitions, licensing arrangements or strategic alliances
may result in:
· |
potentially
dilutive issuances of our equity securities;
and
|
· |
the
incurrence of additional debt.
|
As
has
been our practice in the past, we will continuously evaluate any such
acquisitions, licensing opportunities or strategic alliances as they arise.
However, we have not reached any agreement or arrangement with respect to any
such acquisition, licensing opportunity or strategic alliance at this time
and
we may not be able to consummate any acquisitions, licensing arrangements or
strategic alliances on terms favorable to us or at all. The failure to
consummate any such acquisitions, licensing arrangements or strategic alliances
may reduce our growth and expansion.
12
The
loss of any of our key customers could negatively affect our revenues and
decrease our earnings.
We are
highly dependant upon sales of our private label and branded coffee to two
wholesalers, Supervalu and Topco/Shurfine, and upon sales of wholesale green
coffee to one customer, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters. Sales to Supervalu,
Topco/Shurfine and Green Mountain Coffee Roasters accounted for approximately
7%, 6%, and 23% of our net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2006,
respectively, and 6%, 6% and 31% of our net sales for the year ended October
31,
2006, respectively.
Although
no other customer accounted for greater than 5% of our net sales during these
periods, other customers may account for more than 5% of our net sales in future
periods. We do not have long-term contracts with these or any of our customers.
Accordingly, our customers can stop purchasing our products at any time without
penalty and are free to purchase products from our competitors. The loss of,
or
reduction in sales to, customers such as Supervalu, Topco/Shurfine, Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters or any of our other customers to which we sell a
significant amount of our products or any material adverse change in the
financial condition of such customers would negatively affect our revenues
and
decrease our earnings.
If
we lose our key personnel, including Andrew Gordon and David Gordon, our
revenues and profitability could suffer.
Our
success depends to a large degree upon the services of Andrew Gordon, our
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
and
David Gordon, our Executive Vice President-Operations and Secretary. We also
depend to a large degree on the expertise of our coffee roasters. We do not
have
employment contracts with our coffee roasters. Our ability to source and
purchase a sufficient supply of high quality coffee beans and to roast coffee
beans consistent with our quality standards could suffer if we lose the services
of any of these individuals. As a result, our business and operating results
would be adversely affected. We may not be successful in obtaining and retaining
a replacement for either Andrew Gordon or David Gordon if they elect to stop
working for us. In addition, we do not have key-man insurance on the lives
of
Andrew Gordon or David Gordon.
If
our planned increase in marketing expenditures fails to promote and enhance
our
brands, the value of our brands could decrease and our revenues and
profitability could be adversely affected.
We
believe that promoting and enhancing our brands is critical to our success.
We
intend to increase our marketing expenditures to increase awareness of our
brands, which we expect will create and maintain brand loyalty. If our
brand-building strategy is unsuccessful, these expenses may never be recovered,
and we may be unable to increase awareness of our brands or protect the value
of
our brands. If we are unable to achieve these goals, our revenues and ability
to
implement our business strategy could be adversely affected.
Our
success in promoting and enhancing our brands will also depend on our ability
to
provide customers with high quality products and service. Although we take
measures to ensure that we sell only fresh roasted coffee, we have no control
over our coffee products once they are purchased by our wholesale customers.
Accordingly, wholesale customers may store our coffee for longer periods of
time
or resell our coffee without our consent, in each case, potentially affecting
the quality of the coffee prepared from our products. Although we believe we
are
less susceptible to quality control problems than many of our competitors
because a majority of our products are sold in cans or brick packs unlike whole
bean coffees, if consumers do not perceive our products and service to be of
high quality, then the value of our brands may be diminished and, consequently,
our operating results and ability to implement our business strategy may be
adversely affected.
Our
roasting methods are not proprietary, so competitors may be able to duplicate
them, which could harm our competitive position. If our competitive position
is
weakened, our revenues and profitability could be materially adversely
affected.
We
consider our roasting methods essential to the flavor and richness of our
roasted coffee and, therefore, essential to our brands of coffee. Because we
do
not hold any patents for our roasting methods, it may be difficult for us to
prevent competitors from copying our roasting methods if such methods become
known. If our competitors copy our roasting methods, the value of our coffee
brands may be diminished, and we may lose customers to our competitors. In
addition, competitors may be able to develop roasting methods that are more
advanced than our roasting methods, which may also harm our competitive
position.
13
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly, which makes our results of
operations difficult to predict and could cause our results of operations to
fall short of expectations.
Our
operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year as
a
result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. These
fluctuations could be caused by a number of factors including:
· |
fluctuations
in purchase prices and supply of green
coffee;
|
· |
fluctuations
in the selling prices of our
products;
|
· |
the
level of marketing and pricing competition from existing or new
competitors in the coffee industry;
|
· |
the
success of our hedging strategy;
|
· |
our
ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers;
and
|
· |
our
ability to manage inventory and fulfillment operations and maintain
gross
margins.
|
As
a
result of the foregoing, period-to-period comparisons of our operating results
may not necessarily be meaningful and those comparisons should not be relied
upon as indicators of future performance. Accordingly, our operating results
in
future quarters may be below market expectations. In this event, the price
of
our common stock may decline.
Since
we rely heavily on common carriers to ship our coffee on a daily basis, any
disruption in their services or increase in shipping costs could adversely
affect our relationship with our customers, which could result in reduced
revenues, increased operating expenses, a loss of customers or reduced
profitability.
We rely
on a number of common carriers to deliver coffee to our customers and to deliver
coffee beans to us. We consider roasted coffee a perishable product and we
rely
on these common carriers to deliver fresh roasted coffee on a daily basis.
We
have no control over these common carriers and the services provided by them
may
be interrupted as a result of labor shortages, contract disputes and other
factors. If we experience an interruption in these services, we may be unable
to
ship our coffee in a timely manner, which could reduce our revenues and
adversely effect our relationship with our customers. In addition, a delay
in
shipping could require us to contract with alternative, and possibly more
expensive, common carriers and could cause orders to be cancelled or receipt
of
goods to be refused. Any significant increase in shipping costs could lower
our
profit margins or force us to raise prices, which could cause our revenue and
profits to suffer.
If
there was a significant interruption in the operation of either one of our
facilities, we may not have the capacity to service all of our customers and
we
may not be able to service our customers in a timely manner, thereby reducing
our revenues and earnings.
A
significant interruption in the operation of either of our coffee roasting
and
distribution facilities, whether as a result of a natural disaster or other
causes, could significantly impair our ability to operate our business. Due
to
manufacturing and logistical efficiencies, our New York facility generally
services customers in the Northeastern United States and the Midwest United
States and our La Junta, Colorado facility services customers in the Western
United States. If there was a significant interruption in the operation of
either one of our facilities, we may not have the capacity to service all of
our
customers out of the lone operating facility and we may not be able to service
our customers in a timely manner. As a result, our revenues and earnings would
be materially adversely affected.
14
Risk
Factors Related to the Coffee Industry
Increases
in the cost of high quality Arabica or Robusta coffee beans could reduce our
gross margin and profit.
Coffee
is a traded commodity and, in general, its price can fluctuate depending
on:
· |
weather
patterns in coffee-producing
countries;
|
· |
economic
and political conditions affecting coffee-producing countries, including
acts of terrorism in such
countries;
|
· |
foreign
currency fluctuations; and
|
· |
trade
regulations and restrictions between coffee-producing countries and
the
United States.
|
If
the
cost of wholesale green coffee increases due to any of these factors, our
margins could decrease and our profitability could suffer accordingly. Although
we have historically attempted to raise the selling prices of our products
in
response to increases in the price of wholesale green coffee, when wholesale
green coffee prices increase rapidly or to significantly higher than normal
levels, we are not always able to pass the price increases through to our
customers on a timely basis, if at all, which adversely affects our operating
margins and cash flow. We may not be able to recover any future increases in
the
cost of wholesale green coffee. Even if we are able to recover future increases,
our operating margins and results of operations may still be materially and
adversely affected by time delays in the implementation of price
increases.
Disruptions
in the supply of green coffee could result in a deterioration of our
relationship with our customers, decreased revenues or could impair our ability
to grow our business.
Green
coffee is a commodity and its supply is subject to volatility beyond our
control. Supply is affected by many factors in the coffee growing countries
including weather, political and economic conditions, acts of terrorism, as
well
as efforts by coffee growers to expand or form cartels or associations. If
we
are unable to procure a sufficient supply of green coffee, our sales would
suffer.
Some
of
the arabica coffee beans of the quality we purchase do not trade directly on
the
commodity markets. Rather, we purchase the high end arabica coffee beans that
we
use on a negotiated basis. We depend on our relationships with coffee brokers,
exporters and growers for the supply of our primary raw material, high quality
Arabica coffee beans. If any of our relationships with coffee brokers, exporters
or growers deteriorate, we may be unable to procure a sufficient quantity of
high quality coffee beans at prices acceptable to us or at all. In such case,
we
may not be able to fulfill the demand of our existing customers, supply new
retail stores or expand other channels of distribution. A raw material shortage
could result in a deterioration of our relationship with our customers,
decreased revenues or could impair our ability to expand our
business.
The
coffee industry is highly competitive and if we cannot compete successfully,
we
may lose our customers or experience reduced sales and
profitability.
The
coffee markets in which we do business are highly competitive and competition
in
these markets is likely to become increasingly more intense due to the
relatively low barriers to entry. The industry in which we compete is
particularly sensitive to price pressure, as well as quality, reputation and
viability for wholesale and brand loyalty for retail. To the extent that one
or
more of our competitors becomes more successful with respect to any key
competitive factor, our ability to attract and retain customers could be
materially adversely affected. Our private label and branded coffee products
compete with other manufacturers of private label coffee and branded coffees.
These competitors, such as Kraft General Foods, Inc., The Kroger Co., The
Procter & Gamble Company and Sara Lee Corporation, have much greater
financial, marketing, distribution, management and other resources than we
do
for marketing, promotions and geographic and market expansion. In addition,
there are a growing number of specialty coffee companies who provide specialty
green coffee and roasted coffee for retail sale. If we are unable to compete
successfully against existing and new competitors, we may lose our customers
or
experience reduced sales and profitability.
15
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
We
are
headquartered at 4401 First Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, where we own the land
and an approximately 15,000 square foot building. The building houses our
executive offices, as well as our plant where we roast, blend and package our
coffee.
We
lease
a 50,000 square foot facility located at 27700 Frontage Road in La Junta,
Colorado from the City of La Junta. We pay annual rent of $100,093 through
January of 2024.
We
lease
a 7,500 square foot warehouse located at 4425A First Avenue in Brooklyn from
T
& O Management. T & O Management is not affiliated with us or any of our
officers, directors or stockholders. We pay annual rent of $180,000 under the
terms of the lease, which expires on January 31, 2011.
We
also
use a variety of independent, bonded commercial warehouses to store our green
coffee beans. Our management believes that our facilities are adequate for
our
current operations and for our contemplated operations in the foreseeable
future.
ITEM
3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We
are
not a party to, and none of our property is the subject of, any pending legal
proceedings other than routine litigation that is incidental to our business.
To
our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating initiating any such
proceedings.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
During
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report on Form 10-K,
no
matters were submitted to a vote of security holders.
16
PART
II
ITEM 5. |
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
Our
common stock trades on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “JVA.” We
have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock during the last
two
fiscal years. At December 29, 2006, there were 385 holders of record of an
aggregate of 5,529,830 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. No
shares of common stock were repurchased during fiscal 2006.
The
following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock
for
each quarter since it began trading on May 3, 2005.
2005
|
|||||||
High
|
Low
|
||||||
3rd
Quarter
|
$
|
10.60
|
$
|
4.40
|
|||
4th
Quarter
|
$
|
15.75
|
$
|
4.64
|
2006
|
|||||||
1st
Quarter
|
$
|
8.45
|
$
|
5.40
|
|||
2nd
Quarter
|
$
|
7.40
|
$
|
5.55
|
|||
3rd
Quarter
|
$
|
6.46
|
$
|
3.50
|
|||
4th
Quarter
|
$
|
4.50
|
$
|
3.30
|
On
May 6,
2005, we concluded the public offering of 1,400,000 shares of our common stock
at a price of $5.00 per share and on June 16, 2005 the underwriters exercised
their option to purchase an additional 210,000 shares of our common stock at
a
price of $5.00 per share pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(No.
333-116838) which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 3, 2005. After underwriting discounts and commissions and
offering expenses, we received net proceeds of $6,436,016 in the offering,
after
giving effect to the over-allotment option. We used some of the proceeds to
pay
down bank debt, to build up our inventories for sales expansion and for general
corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures.
Additional proceeds were used to purchase equipment and provide working capital
for our two joint ventures.
17
ITEM
6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The
following table sets forth selected financial data for the last five years
from
the consolidated financial statements of Coffee Holding Co, Inc. The following
information is only a summary, and you should read it in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and notes beginning on page F-1.
For
the Years Ended October 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
51,171
|
$
|
41,545
|
$
|
28,030
|
$
|
20,240
|
$
|
17,433
|
||||||
Cost
of sales
|
43,576
|
33,876
|
20,928
|
15,373
|
12,453
|
|||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
7,595
|
7,669
|
7,102
|
4,867
|
4,980
|
|||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
6,231
|
5,698
|
5,400
|
3,993
|
3,505
|
|||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
1,364
|
1,971
|
1,702
|
874
|
1,475
|
|||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(68
|
)
|
(60
|
)
|
(134
|
)
|
(136
|
)
|
(162
|
)
|
||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
1,296
|
1,911
|
1,568
|
738
|
1,313
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
602
|
726
|
693
|
116
|
558
|
|||||||||||
Minority
interest
|
(6
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
700
|
$
|
1,185
|
$
|
875
|
$
|
622
|
$
|
755
|
||||||
Net
income per share -
Basic
and diluted
|
$
|
0.13
|
$
|
0.25
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.16
|
$
|
0.19
|
At
October 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
18,982
|
$
|
16,545
|
$
|
10,914
|
$
|
7,035
|
$
|
6,042
|
||||||
Short-term
debt
|
2,543
|
1,064
|
3,048
|
215
|
205
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
2,800
|
1,972
|
|||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
7,640
|
5,904
|
7,918
|
4,915
|
4,544
|
|||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
11,342
|
10,642
|
2,996
|
2,120
|
1,498
|
|||||||||||
Book
value per share
|
$
|
2.05
|
$
|
1.92
|
$
|
0.75
|
$
|
0.53
|
0.37
|
18
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION
|
Cautionary
Note on Forward Looking Statements
Some
of
the matters discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or
Plan of Operation,” “Business,” “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual
report include forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We have
based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
projections about future events, including, among other things:
· |
the
impact of rapid or persistent fluctuations in the price of coffee
beans;
|
· |
fluctuations
in the supply of coffee beans;
|
· |
general
economic conditions and conditions which affect the market for
coffee;
|
· |
our
success in implementing our business strategy or introducing new
products;
|
· |
our
ability to attract and retain
customers;
|
· |
our
success in expanding our market presence in new geographic
regions;
|
· |
the
effects of competition from other coffee manufacturers and other
beverage
alternatives;
|
· |
changes
in tastes and preferences for, or the consumption of, coffee;
|
· |
our
ability to obtain additional financing;
and
|
· |
other
risks which we identify in future filings with the Securities and
Exchange
Commission.
|
In
some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,”
“will,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,”
“anticipate,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” and similar
expressions (or the negative of such expressions). Any or all of our forward
looking statements in this annual report and in any other public statements
we
make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions
we
might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no
forward looking statement can be guaranteed. In addition, we undertake no
responsibility to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances which occur after the date of this annual report.
Overview
We
are an
integrated wholesale coffee roaster and dealer in the United States and one
of
the few coffee companies that offers a broad array of coffee products across
the
entire spectrum of consumer tastes, preferences and price points. As a result,
we believe that we are well positioned to increase our profitability and endure
potential coffee price volatility throughout varying cycles of the coffee market
and economic conditions.
19
Our
operations have primarily focused on the following areas of the coffee
industry:
· |
the
sale of wholesale specialty green
coffee;
|
· |
the
roasting, blending, packaging and sale of private label coffee;
and
|
· |
the
roasting, blending, packaging and sale of our seven brands of
coffee.
|
Our
operating results are affected by a number of factors including:
· |
the
level of marketing and pricing competition from existing or new
competitors in the coffee industry;
|
· |
our
ability to retain existing customers and attract new
customers;
|
· |
fluctuations
in purchase prices and supply of green coffee and in the selling
prices of
our products; and
|
· |
our
ability to manage inventory and fulfillment operations and maintain
gross
margins.
|
Our
net
sales are driven primarily by the success of our sales and marketing efforts
and
our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers. For this
reason, we have made the strategic decision to invest in measures that will
increase net sales. In February 2004, we acquired certain assets of Premier
Roasters, including equipment and a roasting facility in La Junta, Colorado.
We
also hired a West Coast Brand Manager to market our S&W brand and to
increase sales of S&W coffee to new customers. In March 2006, we entered
into a joint venture with Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting LLC and formed Café La
Rica, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The joint venture engages
in
the roasting, packaging and sale of the Café La Rica brand coffee and other
branded and food service coffee products in Miami, Florida. We own 50% of the
joint venture and are the primary supplier of its coffee inventory. In April
2006, we entered into a joint venture with Caruso's Coffee of Brecksville,
Ohio
and formed Generations Coffee Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, which will engage in the roasting, packaging and sale of private label
specialty coffee products. We own 60% of the joint venture and are the exclusive
supplier of its coffee inventory. We believe that the Generations Coffee joint
venture will allow us to bid on the private label gourmet whole bean business
we
have not been equipped to pursue from an operational standpoint in the past.
With this specialty roasting facility in place, in many cases right in the
backyard of our most important wholesale and retail customers, we believe that
we are in an ideal position to combine our current canned private label business
with high-end private label specialty whole bean business. High-end specialty
whole bean coffee sells for as much as three times more per pound than the
canned coffees in which we currently specialize. As a result of these efforts,
net sales increased in our specialty green coffee, private label and branded
coffee business lines in both dollars and pounds sold. In addition, we increased
the number of our customers in all three areas.
Our
net
sales are affected by the price of green coffee. We import green coffee from
Colombia, Mexico, Kenya, Brazil and Uganda. The supply and price of coffee
beans
are subject to volatility and are influenced by numerous factors which are
beyond our control. For example, coffee crops in Brazil, which produces
one-third of the world’s green coffee, are susceptible to frost in June and July
and drought in September, October and November. However, because we purchase
coffee from a number of countries and are able to freely substitute one
country’s coffee for another in our products, price fluctuations in one country
generally have not had a material impact on the price we pay for coffee.
Accordingly, price fluctuations in one country generally have not had a material
effect on our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources.
Historically, because we generally have been able to pass green coffee price
increases through to customers, increased prices of green coffee generally
result in increased net sales. However, the average indicator price for Robusta
coffee, the main component for our leading espresso brands (Café Caribe and Café
Supremo), increased 104% by August 2006 compared to August of 2005. This
indicator price was the highest seen in the last seven years as measured by
the
International Coffee Organization. By September 2006, prices had achieved
further gains, trading to their highest levels in eight years. For competitive
reasons, we were not able to pass these price increases through to our
customers. As a result, the increases in the price of coffee had the effect
of
diminishing our profit margins significantly on our leading espresso lines
as
there were no lower priced coffees to substitute into our blends and we were
not
able to increase our prices to maintain our margins. In October 2006, national
brands reacted to these price increases, raising list prices by $0.12 per unit,
and we were able to increase our prices as well.
20
Historically,
we have used short-term coffee futures and options contracts primarily for
the
purpose of partially hedging and minimizing the effects of changing green coffee
prices and to reduce our cost of sales. In addition, we acquire futures
contracts with longer terms, generally three to four months, primarily for
the
purpose of guaranteeing an adequate supply of green coffee at favorable prices.
Although the use of these derivative financial instruments has enabled us to
mitigate the effect of changing prices, no strategy can entirely eliminate
pricing risks and we generally remain exposed to loss when prices decline
significantly in a short period of time. In addition, we generally remain
exposed to supply risk in the event of non-performance by the counter-parties
to
any futures contracts. If the hedges that we enter do not adequately offset
the
risks of coffee bean price volatility or our hedges result in losses, our cost
of sales may increase, resulting in a decrease in profitability.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for, but
not
limited to, the accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories,
income taxes and loss contingencies. Management bases its estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to
be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We
believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, may be
impacted significantly by judgment, assumptions and estimates used in the
preparation of the financial statements:
· |
We
recognize revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”).
Under SAB 104, revenue is recognized at the point of passage to the
customer of title and risk of loss, when there is persuasive evidence
of
an arrangement, the sales price is determinable, and collection of
the
resulting receivable is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue
at the
time of shipment. Sales are reflected net of discounts and
returns.
|
· |
Our
allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained to provide for losses
arising from customers’ inability to make required payments. If there is
deterioration of our customers’ credit worthiness and/or there is an
increase in the length of time that the receivables are past due
greater
than the historical assumptions used, additional allowances may be
required. For example, every additional one percent of our accounts
receivable that becomes uncollectible, would reduce our operating
income
by approximately $65,000.
|
21
· |
Inventories
are stated at cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis). Based
on
our assumptions about future demand and market conditions, inventories
are
subject to be written-down to market value. If our assumptions about
future demand change and/or actual market conditions are less favorable
than those projected, additional write-downs of inventories may be
required. Each additional one percent of potential inventory writedown
would have reduced operating income by approximately $30,000 for
the year
ended October 31, 2006.
|
· |
We
account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No.
109”). Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect
for
the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred
tax
assets are reflected on the balance sheet when it is determined that
it is
more likely than not that the asset will be realized. Accordingly,
our net
deferred tax asset of $208,700 could need to be written off if we
do not
remain profitable.
|
Year
Ended October 31, 2006 (Fiscal 2006) Compared to the Year Ended October 31,
2005
(Fiscal 2005)
Net
Income.
Net
income decreased $485,053, or 40.9%, to $700,082 or $.13 per share for the
year
ended October 31, 2006 compared to $1,185,135 or $.25 per share for the year
ended October 31, 2005. The
decrease in net income primarily reflects increased
cost of sales and operating expenses and a loss by our Café La Rica joint
venture, partially offset by increased net sales. We believe the loss by Café La
Rica, which was formed in March 2006, is consistent with the typical initial
performance of a start-up venture of this type.
Net
Sales.
Net
sales totaled $51,171,202 for the year ended October 31, 2006, an increase
of
$9,625,857 or 23.2% from $41,545,345 for the year ended October 31, 2005. The
increase in net sales reflects a 10.4% increase in coffee pounds sold from
31.6
million pounds in 2005 to 34.9 million pounds in 2006. The increase in pounds
of
coffee sold is the result of increased sales of our branded and specialty green
coffees. Sales of our Café Caribe brand increased once again and sales of our
second Hispanic espresso, Café Supremo, increased 48%, as measured by
Information Resources Incorporated data. The number of our customers in the
specialty green coffee area grew approximately 3% to 290 customers. These
customers are predominately independent gourmet/specialty roasters, some of
whom
own their own retail outlets. Sales to new customers in this area historically
start slowly because many of these companies are start up ventures. Because
the
specialty green coffee area is the fastest growing segment of the coffee market,
we believe that our customer base and sales will grow in this area. The increase
in coffee prices also contributed to the increase in net sales.
Cost
of Sales.
Cost of
sales for the year ended October 31, 2006 was $43,575,963 or 85.2% of net sales,
as compared to $33,875,973 or 81.5% of net sales for the year ended October
31,
2005. Cost of sales consists primarily of the cost of green coffee and packaging
materials and realized and unrealized gains or losses on hedging activity.
The
increase in cost of sales reflects higher packaging costs associated with the
increase in net sales of approximately $300,000 and increased purchases of
green
coffee in the amount of approximately $5.8 million. The increase in green coffee
purchases resulted from increased pounds sold and higher green coffee prices
during the period as prices increased $0.23 per pound on the New York Arabica
market and $0.27 per pound on the London Robusta market year to
year.
The
average indicator price for Robusta coffee, the main component for our leading
espresso brands (Café Caribe and Café Supremo), increased 104% by August 2006
compared to August of 2005. This indicator price was the highest seen in the
last seven years as measured by the International Coffee Organization. By
September 2006, prices had achieved further gains, trading to their highest
levels in eight years. For competitive reasons, we were not able to pass these
price increases through to our customers. As a result, these increases had
the
effect of diminishing our profit margins significantly on our leading espresso
lines as there were no lower priced coffees to substitute into our blends.
In
addition, our private label margins were negatively impacted as well, but to
a
much lesser degree, as Robustas represent only a small percentage of our private
label blends. In October 2006, national brands reacted to these price increases,
raising list prices by $0.12 per unit. We increased our prices as
well.
22
Gross
Profit.
Gross
profit for the year ended October 31, 2006 was $7,595,239, a decrease of $74,133
from $7,669,372 for the year ended October 31, 2005. Gross profit as a
percentage of net sales decreased by 3.7% to 14.8% for the year ended October
31, 2006 from 18.5% for the year ended October 31, 2005. The decrease in our
margins is mainly attributable to increases in coffee prices.
Operating
Expenses.
Total
operating expenses increased $532,669 or 9.3% to $6,230,932 for the year ended
October 31, 2006 from $5,698,263 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005
due
to increases in selling and administrative expenses and officers’ salaries
partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense. Selling and administrative
expenses increased $731,769 or 15% to $5,585,787 for the year ended October
31,
2006 from $4,854,018 for 2005. The increase in selling and administrative
expenses reflects several factors, including increases of approximately $485,000
in labor costs $155,000 in professional fees and $234,000 in shipping costs,
partially offset by decreases of $60,000 in show and demo costs, $50,000 in
advertising and promotion and $40,000 in bank charges.
The
increase in labor costs is attributable to an increase in administrative and
sales staff, salary increases and bonuses. The increase in professional fees
was
due to the requirements of implementing our compliance with Section 404 of
the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The increase in shipping costs was attributable to increased
sales as well as higher fuel prices which resulted in increased trucking rates.
The decrease in show and demo costs represents a change in our sales strategy.
The decrease in advertising and promotion is attributable to reduced allowances
to customers which resulted in reduced chargebacks.
Officers’
salaries increased $41,807 to $616,052 for the year ended October 31, 2006
from
$574,245 for the year ended October 31, 2005. The increase was mainly due to
a
fiscal year 2006 bonus paid to our President and Chief Executive Officer and
was
partially offset by a $35,000 reduction in his annual salary effective in August
of 2006.
Other
Income and Expense.
Other
expense increased $8,011 or 13.3% from $60,321 for the year ended October 31,
2005 to $68,332 for the year ended October 31, 2006. The increase was
attributable a loss in the initial year of our Café La Rica joint venture of
$176,911 and an increase in interest expense of $19,417. The increase was
partially offset by an increase in interest income of $78,604, a $65,310
increase in other income and $44,403 in management fee income earned from
providing administrative services to the Café La Rica joint venture. We believe
the loss by Café La Rica, which was formed in March 2006, is consistent with the
typical initial performance of a start-up venture of this type.
Income
Before Taxes.
We had
income of $1,295,975 before income taxes for the year ended October 31, 2006
compared to income of $1,910,788 before income taxes for the year ended October
31, 2005. The decrease was attributable to increased cost of sales due to
increased commodity prices and operating expenses, partially offset by increased
net sales.
Income
Taxes.
Our
provision for income taxes for the year ended October 31, 2006 totaled $602,059
compared to $725,653 for the year ended October 31, 2005 as a result of
decreased income before taxes. Our effective tax rate remained the
same.
23
Year
Ended October 31, 2005 (Fiscal 2005) Compared to the Year Ended October 31,
2004
(Fiscal 2004)
Net
Income.
Net
income increased $309,793, or 35.4%, to $1,185,135 or $0.25 per share for the
year ended October 31, 2005 compared to $875,342 or $0.22 per share for the
year
ended October 31, 2004. The increase in net income primarily reflects increased
net sales, offset in part by an increase in cost of sales.
Net
Sales.
Net
sales totaled $41,545,345 for the year ended October 31, 2005, an increase
of
$13,514,956 or 48.2% from $28,030,389 for the year ended October 31, 2004.
The
increase in net sales reflects a 20.6% increase in coffee pounds sold from 26.2
million pounds in 2004 to 31.6 million pounds in 2005. The increase in pounds
of
coffee sold is the result of increased sales of our private label, branded
and
specialty green coffees. Sales of our Café Caribe brand, as measured by
Information Resources Incorporated data, increased approximately 21.0% over
fiscal 2004 due in part to the efforts of our third party marketing specialists
through label redesigns and new distribution. The number of our customers in
the
specialty green coffee area grew approximately 7.3% to 281 customers. These
customers are predominately independent gourmet/specialty roasters, some of
whom
own their own retail outlets. Sales to new customers in this area historically
start slowly because many of these companies are start up ventures. Because
the
specialty green coffee area is the fastest growing segment of the coffee market,
we believe that our customer base and sales will grow in this area. The increase
in the price of the underlying commodity (coffee) also contributed to the
increase in net sales.
Cost
of Sales.
Cost of
sales for the year ended October 31, 2005 was $33,875,973 or 81.5% of net sales,
as compared to $20,927,506 or 74.7% of net sales for the year ended October
31,
2004. Cost of sales consists primarily of the cost of green coffee and packaging
materials and realized and unrealized gains or losses on hedging activity.
The
increase in cost of sales reflects increased purchases of green coffee in the
amount of approximately $12.5 million due to increased pounds sold and higher
green coffee prices during the period as prices increased $0.23 per pound year
to year, an increase in packaging costs associated with the increase in net
sales of approximately $1.0 million, and a decrease in net gains on future
contracts. As the price of coffee is cyclical and volatile and subject to many
factors, including weather, politics and economics, we are unable to predict
the
purchase price of green coffee for fiscal 2006. We began to acquire futures
contracts with longer terms (generally three to four months) primarily for
the
purpose of guaranteeing an adequate supply of green coffee at favorable prices
beginning in the latter half of fiscal 2000 and continuing through fiscal 2005.
The use of these derivative financial instruments has enabled us to mitigate
the
effect of changing prices, to increase our margins as coffee prices have
increased and to be more competitive with our pricing.
Gross
Profit.
Gross
profit for the year ended October 31, 2005 was $7,669,372, an increase of
$566,489 or 8.0%, from $7,102,883 for the year ended October 31, 2004. Gross
profit as a percentage of net sales decreased by 6.8% to 18.5% for the year
ended October 31, 2005 from 25.3% for the year ended October 31, 2004. The
decrease in our margins is mainly attributable to decreased net gains on future
contracts during fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 and increases in coffee
prices.
Operating
Expenses.
Total
operating expenses increased $297,881 or 5.5% to $5,698,263 for the year ended
October 31, 2005 from $5,400,382 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004
due
to increases in selling and administrative expenses and bad debt expense,
partially offset by decreased officers’ salaries. Selling and administrative
expenses increased $107,123 or 2.3% to $4,854,018 for the year ended October
31,
2005 from $4,746,895 for 2004. The increase in selling and administrative
expenses reflects several factors, including increases of approximately $194,000
in insurance and $162,000 in shipping costs, partially offset by decreases
of
$167,000 in office salaries and $83,000 in payroll taxes.
24
The
increase in insurance was due to the purchase of directors’ and officers’
insurance following our initial public offering. The increase in shipping costs
was attributable to increased sales. The decrease in office salaries and payroll
was due to the departure of our Chief Financial Officer and other administrative
staff. Our President and Chief Executive Officer has since assumed the duties
previously associated with our Chief Financial Officer.
Officers’
salaries decreased $48,328 to $574,245 for the year ended October 31, 2005
from
$622,573 for the year ended October 31, 2004. The decrease was mainly due to
our
President and Chief Executive Officer’s decision not to accept a bonus for
2005.
Other
Income and Expense.
Other
expense decreased $73,643 or 55.0% from $133,964 for the year ended October
31,
2004 to $60,321 for the year ended October 31, 2005. The decrease was
attributable to both an increase in interest income of $38,397 and a decrease
in
interest expense of $35,246.
Income
Before Taxes.
We had
income of $1,910,788 before income taxes for the year ended October 31, 2005
compared to income of $1,568,537 before income taxes for the year ended October
31, 2004. The increase was attributable to increased income from operations
and
decreased other expense.
Income
Taxes.
Our
provision for income taxes for the year ended October 31, 2005 totaled $725,653
compared to $693,195 for the year ended October 31, 2004 as a result of
increased income before taxes. There was a slight change in the effective rate
due to income tax refunds.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As
of
October 31, 2006, we had working capital of $8,357,022 which represented an
$83,073 increase from our working capital of $8,273,849 as of October 31, 2005,
and total stockholders’ equity of $11,341,704, which increased by $700,082 from
our total stockholders’ equity of $10,641,622 as of October 31, 2005. Our
working capital increased primarily due to an decrease of $1,597,035 in
inventories, an increase of $1,336,095 in the commodities held at broker and
an
increase in our accounts receivable of $1,375,272. Obligations under our line
of
credit borrowings increased by $1,479,714. At October 31, 2006, the outstanding
balance on our line of credit was $2,542,881 compared to $1,063,167 at October
31, 2005. Total stockholders’ equity increased due to our net income for the
fiscal year.
As
of
October 31, 2006, we had a financing agreement with Merrill Lynch Business
Financial Services Inc. This line of credit is for a maximum $4,000,000, expires
on October 31, 2007 and requires monthly interest payments at a rate of LIBOR
plus 2.15%. This loan is secured by a blanket lien on all of our
assets.
The
credit facility contains covenants that place restrictions on our operations.
Among other things, these covenants: require us to maintain certain financial
ratios; require us to maintain a minimum net worth; and prohibit us from merging
with or into other companies, acquiring all or substantially all of the assets
of other companies, or selling all or substantially all of our assets without
the consent of the lender. These restrictions could adversely impact our ability
to implement our business plan, or raise additional capital, if needed. In
addition, if we default under our existing credit facility or if our lender
demands payment of a portion or all of our indebtedness, we may not have
sufficient funds to make such payments. As of October 31, 2006, we were in
compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility.
25
We
also
leased machinery and equipment under a capital lease which expired in July
2006.
The interest rate on the capital lease was 7.347% per annum. The outstanding
balance was paid in full during the year.
For
the
year ended October 31, 2006 compared to 2005 our operating activities used
net
cash of $319,564 as compared to the year ended October 31, 2005 when net cash
used by operating activities was $3,879,082. The increased cash flow from
operations for the year ended October 31, 2006 was primarily due to a decrease
of $1,597,035 in inventories and also, a decrease in accounts payable and
accrued expenses of $397,112 and less of an increase in commodities held at
broker of $1,336,095.
For
the
year ended October 31, 2006, our investing activities used net cash of $776,458
as compared to the year October 31, 2005 when net cash used by investing
activities was $474,147. The increase in net cash used by investing activities
for fiscal 2006 was due to the investments in our joint ventures, partially
offset by decreased purchases of property and equipment.
The
change in cash flow from financing activities for the year ended October 31,
2006 was primarily due to net proceeds from our May 2005 initial public offering
of $6,436,016.
For
the
year ended October 31, 2005, our operating activities used net cash of
$3,879,082 as compared to the year ended October 31, 2004 when net cash provided
by operating activities was $1,616,465. The decreased cash flow from operations
for the year ended October 31, 2005 was primarily due to an increase of
$2,238,389 in inventories, an increase of $2,120,493 in the commodities held
at
broker and an increase of $1,423,821 in accounts receivable.
For
the
year ended October 31, 2005, our investing activities used net cash of $474,147
as compared to the year October 31, 2004 when net cash used by investing
activities was $1,056,179. The decrease in net cash used by investing activities
for fiscal 2005 was due to decreased purchases of property and equipment as
the
purchase of property and equipment from Premier Roasters occurred in February
2004.
For
the
year ended October 31, 2005, our financing activities provided net cash of
$4,446,552 as compared to the year ended October 31, 2004 when net cash provided
by financing activities was $8,027. The increased cash flow from financing
activities was primarily due to net proceeds from our May 2005 initial public
offering of $6,436,016, offset in part by increased net cash payments under
our
line of credit. Net cash used on our line of credit increased $2,014,857 to
net
cash used of $1,621,878 for the year ended October 31, 2005 compared to net
cash
provided of $392,979 for the year ended October 31, 2004. In addition, during
fiscal 2005, we used $252,000 to fully pay off a term loan we no longer
utilize
We
expect
to fund our operations, including paying our liabilities, funding capital
expenditures and making required payments on our debts, through October 31,
2007
with cash provided by operating activities and the use of our credit facility.
In addition, an increase in eligible accounts receivable and inventory would
permit us to make additional borrowings under our line of credit. We also
believe we could, if necessary, obtain additional loans by mortgaging our
headquarters.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely
to
have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
26
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market
risks relating to our operations result primarily from changes in interest
rates
and commodity prices as further described below.
Interest
Rate Risks. We
are
subject to market risk from exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. At
October 31, 2006, our debt consisted of $2,542,881 of variable rate debt under
our revolving line of credit. At October 31, 2006, interest on the variable
rate
debt was payable primarily at 7.47% (or 2.15% above the one-month LIBOR rate)
for the revolving line of credit.
Commodity
Price Risks. The
supply and price of coffee beans are subject to volatility and are influenced
by
numerous factors which are beyond our control. Historically, we have used
short-term coffee futures and options contracts primarily for the purpose of
partially hedging and minimizing the effects of changing green coffee prices,
as
further explained in Note 2 of the notes to financial statements in this report.
In addition, during the latter half of fiscal 2000, we began to acquire futures
contracts with longer terms (generally three to four months) primarily for
the
purpose of guaranteeing an adequate supply of green coffee. The use of these
derivative financial instruments has enabled us to mitigate the effect of
changing prices although we generally remain exposed to loss when prices decline
significantly in a short period of time and remain at higher levels, preventing
us from obtaining inventory at favorable prices. We generally have been able
to
pass green coffee price increases through to customers, thereby maintaining
our
gross profits. However, we cannot predict whether we will be able to pass
inventory price increases through to our customers in the future. We believe
our
hedging policies remain a vital element to our business model not only in
controlling our cost of sales, but also giving us the flexibility to obtain
the
inventory necessary to continue to grow our sales while minimizing margin
compression during a time of historically high coffee prices.
At
October 31, 2006, we held 70 options (generally with terms of two months or
less) covering an aggregate of 2,625,000 pounds of green coffee beans at prices
of $1.05 per pound. The fair market value of these options, which was obtained
from major financial institutions, was $116,813 at October 31,
2006.
At
October 31, 2006, we held 129 future contracts for the purchase of 2,465,000
pounds of coffee at an average price of $1.05 per pound. The market price of
coffee applicable to such contracts was $1.05 per pound at October 31,
2006.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See
pages
F-1 through F-21 following the Exhibit Index of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM
9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
27
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Management,
including the Company’s President, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer (who is
the Company’s principal executive officer and principal accounting officer), has
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of
the
period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s
President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required
to be
disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act
is
(i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and
(ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including
its principal executive officer and financial officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding disclosure.
There
have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the Company’s
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM
9B. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
28
PART
III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information
required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy
Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Information
required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy
Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM
12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information
required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy
Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The
following table sets forth the aggregate information of our equity compensation
plans in effect as of October 31, 2006.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
Plan
category
|
Number
of securities
to
be issued
upon
exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
|
|||
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
—
|
—
|
800,000
|
|||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||
Total
|
—
|
—
|
800,000
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Information
required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy
Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
29
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information
required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy
Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
30
PART
IV
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The
financial statements listed below are filed as a part of this report. See Index
to Financial Statements beginning on Page F-1.
Consolidated
Financial Statements:
- Index
to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
- Report
of
Independent Registered Public Accountants.
- Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2006 and 2005.
- Consolidated
Statements of Income - Years Ended October 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
- Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity - Years Ended October 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004.
- Statements
of Cash Flows - Years Ended October 31, 2005 and 2004.
- Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
- (a)(2)
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.
See
Exhibit Index following the signature page to this report.
31
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the
Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized on January 26, 2007.
COFFEE HOLDING CO., INC. | ||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Andrew Gordon | |
Andrew Gordon |
||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the
dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
|
/s/
Andrew Gordon
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
|
|
Andrew
Gordon
|
Director
(principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting
officer)
|
|
Date:
January 26, 2007
|
||
/s/
David Gordon
|
Executive
Vice President -- Operations, Secretary and Director
|
|
David
Gordon
|
||
Date:
January 26, 2007
|
||
/s/
Gerard DeCapua
|
Director
|
|
Gerard
DeCapua
|
||
Date:
January 26, 2007
|
||
/s/
Daniel Dwyer
|
Director
|
|
Daniel Dwyer |
||
Date:
January 26, 2007
|
||
Director
|
||
Barry
Knepper
|
|
|
Date:
|
||
/s/
John Rotelli
|
Director
|
|
John Rotelli
|
||
Date:
January 26, 2007
|
||
/s/ Robert M. Williams |
Director
|
|
Robert M. Williams |
||
Date:
January 26, 2007
|
|
32
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
2.1
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger by and among Transpacific International Group
Corp. and
Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
2 to
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form
SB-2
(file No. 333-00588-NY) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 10, 1997).
|
|
2.2
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated February 4, 2004, by and between Coffee
Holding
Co., Inc. and Premier Roasters LLC (incorporated herein by reference
to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 4, 2004
as
filed with the SEC on February 20, 2004).
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Coffee Holding Co., Inc.,
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Coffee Holding
Co., Inc. Form 8-A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on
May 2, 2005).
|
|
3.2
|
By-Laws
of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit
3.2 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Form 8-A, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2005).
|
|
4.1
|
Form
of Stock Certificate of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (incorporated herein
by
reference to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Registration Statement
on Form
SB-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 24,
2004).
|
|
10.1
|
Lease
with T&O Management Corp. dated August 15, 1997 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 1998, filed with
the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 27,
2000).
|
|
10.2
|
1998
Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the
Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended April 30, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on
October 27, 2000).
|
|
10.3
|
Working
Capital Management Account Loan and Security Agreement with Merrill
Lynch
Business Financial Services Inc. (incorporated herein by reference
to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-KSB,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10,
2005).
|
|
10.4
|
Amendment
to Working Capital Account Loan and Security Agreement with Merrill
Lynch
Business Financial Services, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference
to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Quarterly Report on
Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2005).
|
|
10.9
|
Capital
Lease Agreement with HSBC Business Credit (USA), Inc. (incorporated
herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 1 to the Coffee Holding
Co.,
Inc. Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, filed with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission on August 12, 2004).
|
|
10.10
|
Sales
contract with Supervalu and Cub Foods (incorporated herein by reference
to
Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 1 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc.
Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended October 31, 2002, filed
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2004) (confidential
portions have been redacted pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission).
|
10.11
|
Sales
contract with Shurfine Central (incorporated herein by reference
to
Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 1 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc.
Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended October 31, 2002, filed
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2004) (confidential
portions have been redacted pursuant to a request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission).
|
|
10.12
|
Lease
dated February 4, 2004 by and between Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and
the
City of La Junta, Colorado (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.12 to Amendment No. 1 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Registration
Statement on Form SB-2/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 12, 2004).
|
|
10.13
|
Trademark
License Agreement dated February 4, 2004 between Del Monte Corporation
and
Coffee Holding Co, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.13
to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A
for the
quarter ended April 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 26, 2004).
|
|
10.14
|
Employment
agreement by and among Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and Andrew Gordon
(incorporated herein by reference to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc.
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 24, 2004).
|
|
10.15
|
Employment
agreement by and among Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and David Gordon
(incorporated herein by reference to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc.
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 24, 2004).
|
|
10.17
|
Corporate
Brands Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004 by and between Albertson’s,
Inc. and Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (incorporated herein by reference
to
Amendment No. 2 to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Registration Statement
on
Form SB-2/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October
25, 2004) (confidential portions have been redacted pursuant to a
request
for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission).
|
|
10.19
|
Coffee
Holding Co., Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to the Coffee Holding Co., Inc. Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-QSB, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 14,
2005).
|
|
11.1
|
Earnings
Per Share.
|
|
|
||
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification.
|
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
|
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS:
|
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
|
F-2
|
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2006 AND 2005
|
F-3
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME - YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
|
F-4
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY - YEARS ENDED OCTOBER
31,
2006, 2005 AND 2004
|
F-5
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, 2005 AND
2004
|
F-6
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-7/21
|
*
*
*
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To
the
Board of Directors
Coffee
Holding Co., Inc. and Subsidiary
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Coffee Holding Co.,
Inc.
and Subsidiary as of October 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended October 31, 2006. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in Part IV, Item 15. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Coffee Holding Co., Inc.
and
Subsidiary as of October 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of its operations
and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2006,
in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of
America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
/s/
LAZAR LEVINE & FELIX, LLP
|
|||
LAZAR
LEVINE & FELIX,
LLP
|
New
York,
New York
January
9, 2007
F-2
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
OCTOBER
31, 2006 AND 2005
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
-
ASSETS -
|
|||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|||||||
Cash
|
$
|
1,112,165
|
$
|
735,468
|
|||
Commodities
held at broker
|
4,330,489
|
2,994,394
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $420,349 for
2006
and 2005, respectively
|
6,534,848
|
5,159,576
|
|||||
Inventories
|
2,899,543
|
4,496,578
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
328,544
|
272,541
|
|||||
Prepaid
and refundable income taxes
|
302,003
|
11,629
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax assets
|
221,000
|
318,600
|
|||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
15,728,592
|
13,988,786
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $4,159,274
and
$3,727,524 for 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
2,138,951
|
2,379,952
|
|||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
408,798
|
-
|
|||||
Due
from joint venture
|
73,658
|
-
|
|||||
Deposits
and other assets
|
631,859
|
176,575
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
18,981,858
|
$
|
16,545,313
|
|||
-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY -
|
|||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
4,828,689
|
$
|
4,431,577
|
|||
Current
portion of obligations under capital lease
|
-
|
1,329
|
|||||
Line
of credit borrowings
|
2,542,881
|
1,063,167
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable - current
|
-
|
218,864
|
|||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
7,371,570
|
5,714,937
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax liabilities
|
12,300
|
53,700
|
|||||
Deferred
compensation payable
|
256,284
|
135,054
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
7,640,154
|
5,903,691
|
|||||
MINORITY
INTEREST
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $.001 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, par value $.001 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized, 5,529,830
shares issued and outstanding for 2006 and 2005,
respectively
|
5,530
|
5,530
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
7,327,023
|
7,327,023
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
4,009,151
|
3,309,069
|
|||||
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
11,341,704
|
10,641,622
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
18,981,858
|
$
|
16,545,313
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
NET
SALES
|
$
|
51,171,202
|
$
|
41,545,345
|
$
|
28,030,389
|
||||
COST
OF SALES
|
43,575,963
|
33,875,973
|
20,927,506
|
|||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
7,595,239
|
7,669,372
|
7,102,883
|
|||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
||||||||||
Selling
and administrative
|
5,585,787
|
4,854,018
|
4,746,895
|
|||||||
Bad
debt expense
|
29,093
|
270,000
|
30,914
|
|||||||
Officers'
salaries
|
616,052
|
574,245
|
622,573
|
|||||||
TOTALS
|
6,230,932
|
5,698,263
|
5,400,382
|
|||||||
INCOME
FROM OPERATIONS
|
1,364,307
|
1,971,109
|
1,702,501
|
|||||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
||||||||||
Interest
income
|
128,967
|
50,363
|
11,966
|
|||||||
Other
income
|
65,310
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Equity
in loss of joint venture
|
(176,911
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Management
fee income
|
44,403
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(130,101
|
)
|
(110,684
|
)
|
(145,930
|
)
|
||||
TOTALS
|
(68,332
|
)
|
(60,321
|
)
|
(133,964
|
)
|
||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST IN
SUBSIDIARY
|
1,295,975
|
1,910,788
|
1,568,537
|
|||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
602,059
|
725,653
|
693,195
|
|||||||
INCOME
BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
693,916
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
||||
Minority
interest in subsidiary
|
6,166
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$
|
700,082
|
$
|
1,185,135
|
$
|
875,342
|
||||
Basic
and diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
.13
|
$
|
.25
|
$
|
.22
|
||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
5,529,830
|
4,721,327
|
3,999,650
|
|||||||
Diluted
|
5,599,830
|
4,776,757
|
3,999,650
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
YEARS
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid - in Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
$.001
Par Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Number
of
|
||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
October 31, 2003
|
3,999,650
|
$
|
4,000
|
$
|
867,887
|
$
|
1,248,592
|
$
|
2,120,479
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
875,342
|
875,342
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
October 31, 2004
|
3,999,650
|
4,000
|
867,887
|
2,123,934
|
2,995,821
|
|||||||||||
Sale
of common stock
|
1,610,000
|
1,610
|
6,434,496
|
-
|
6,436,016
|
|||||||||||
Return
of stock to Treasury-Cancelled
|
(89,820
|
)
|
(90
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for services
|
10,000
|
10
|
24,640
|
-
|
24,650
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,185,135
|
1,185,135
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
October 31, 2005
|
5,529,830
|
5,530
|
7,327,023
|
3,309,069
|
10,641,622
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
700,082
|
700,082
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
October 31, 2006
|
5,529,830
|
$
|
5,530
|
$
|
7,327,023
|
$
|
4,009,151
|
$
|
11,341,704
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
700,082
|
$
|
1,185,135
|
$
|
875,342
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
|
431,750
|
373,106
|
363,612
|
|||||||
Bad
debt expense
|
5,421
|
270,000
|
30,914
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
56,200
|
(173,200
|
)
|
(27,200
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
from joint venture
|
176,911
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Commodities
held at broker
|
(1,336,095
|
)
|
(2,120,493
|
)
|
20,222
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(1,380,693
|
)
|
(1,423,821
|
)
|
(1,881,986
|
)
|
||||
Inventories
|
1,597,035
|
(2,238,289
|
)
|
(476,865
|
)
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(56,003
|
)
|
563,558
|
(244,963
|
)
|
|||||
Prepaid
and refundable income taxes
|
(290,374
|
)
|
(11,629
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Due
from joint venture
|
(73,658
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
397,112
|
(227,259
|
)
|
2,797,389
|
||||||
Income
tax payable
|
(218,864
|
)
|
58,864
|
160,000
|
||||||
Deposits
and other assets
|
(328,388
|
)
|
(135,054
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(319,564
|
)
|
(3,879,082
|
)
|
1,616,465
|
|||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(190,749
|
)
|
(466,122
|
)
|
(1,039,479
|
)
|
||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
(585,709
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Security
deposits
|
-
|
(8,025
|
)
|
(16,700
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(776,458
|
)
|
(474,147
|
)
|
(1,056,179
|
)
|
||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Principal
payments on term loan
|
-
|
(252,000
|
)
|
(84,000
|
)
|
|||||
Net
proceeds from initial public offering
|
-
|
6,436,016
|
-
|
|||||||
Advances
under bank line of credit
|
41,847,244
|
27,754,052
|
28,108,814
|
|||||||
Principal
payments under bank line of credit
|
(40,367,530
|
)
|
(29,375,930
|
)
|
(27,715,835
|
)
|
||||
Payments
to related parties
|
-
|
-
|
(79,646
|
)
|
||||||
Principal
payments of obligations under capital leases
|
(1,329
|
)
|
(115,586
|
)
|
(221,306
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
1,478,385
|
4,446,552
|
8,027
|
|||||||
MINORITY
INTEREST
|
(5,666
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH
|
376,697
|
93,323
|
568,313
|
|||||||
Cash,
beginning of year
|
735,468
|
642,145
|
73,832
|
|||||||
CASH,
END OF YEAR
|
$
|
1,112,165
|
$
|
735,468
|
$
|
642,145
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW DATA:
|
||||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
121,844
|
$
|
103,286
|
$
|
145,930
|
||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
831,503
|
$
|
460,744
|
$
|
370,850
|
On
June
10, 2005, 10,000 shares of restricted stock valued at $24,650 were issued
for
services to be rendered.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
1 - BUSINESS
ACTIVITIES:
Coffee
Holding Co., Inc. (the “Company”) conducts wholesale coffee operations,
including manufacturing, roasting, packaging, marketing and distributing roasted
and blended coffees for private labeled accounts and its own brands, and sells
green coffee. The Company’s sales are primarily to customers that are located
throughout the United States and Canada consisting of supermarkets, wholesalers,
gourmet roasters, and individually owned and multi-unit retailers.
The
Company owns a 60% interest in Generations Coffee Company, LLC (“GCC”) effective
April 7, 2006. GCC is in the same business as the Company and had limited
operations during the period ended October 31, 2006. The Company also exercises
control of GCC. As a result of its 60% interest and control, the financial
statements of GCC are consolidated with the Company.
The
Company also owns a 50% interest in Cafe La Rica, LLC (“CLR”) effective March
10, 2006. CLR is in the same business as the Company and is being recorded
as an
investment in joint venture. The Company does not exercise control of CLR.
As a
result, the financial statements of CLR are not consolidated and is accounted
for by the equity method of accounting.
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
The
Company’s accounting policies are in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Outlined below are those
policies considered to be particularly significant.
USE
OF ESTIMATES:
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures.
Accordingly, actual results could differ from those amounts.
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION:
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and GCC.
In 2006, the equity method of accounting was used to record the Company’s share
of the loss in CLR. All significant inter-company balances and transactions
have
been eliminated in consolidation.
CASH
EQUIVALENTS:
Cash
equivalents represent highly liquid investments with maturities of three months
or less at the date of purchase.
INVENTORIES:
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or
market.
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT:
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
F-7
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, ,2005 AND 2004
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):
HEDGING:
The
Company uses options and futures contracts to partially hedge the effects of
fluctuations in the price of green coffee beans. Options and futures contracts
are marked to market with current recognition of gains and losses on such
positions. The Company's accounting for options and futures contracts may
increase earnings volatility in any particular period. The Company has open
position contracts held by the broker which includes commodities for cash,
futures and options in the amount of $4,330,489 and $2,994,394 at October 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company classifies its options and future
contracts as trading securities and accordingly, unrealized holding gains and
losses are included in earnings and not reflected as a net amount in a separate
component of shareholders’ equity.
At
October 31, 2006, the Company held 70 options (generally with terms of two
months or less) covering an aggregate of 2,625,000 pounds of green coffee beans
at $1.05 per pound. The fair market value of these options, which was obtained
from major financial institutions, was $116,813 at October 31, 2006.
At
October 31, 2005, the Company held 300 options (generally with terms of two
months or less) covering an aggregate of 11,250,000 pounds of green coffee
beans
at prices of $.9750 to $1.00 per pound. The fair market value of these options,
which was obtained from a major financial institution, was $159,750 at October
31, 2005.
At
October 31, 2006, the Company held 129 future contracts for the purchase of
4,837,500 pounds of coffee at an average price of $1.05 per pound. The market
price of coffee applicable to such contracts was $1.08 per pound aggregating
$2,662,200 at October 31, 2006. At October 31, 2005, the Company did not hold
any future contracts.
The
Company currently has agreements with two of its wholesale vendors in which
it
is the supplier at fixed prices for lines of private label ground coffee. The
Company is the exclusive customer of one of these wholesale vendors. The
agreements generally contain only pricing terms and do not contain minimum
purchase requirements.
Included
in cost of sales and due from broker for the years ended October 31, 2006,
2005
and 2004, the Company recorded realized and unrealized gains and losses
respectively, on these contracts as follows:
YEARS
ENDED
OCTOBER
31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Gross
realized gains
|
$
|
2,769,507
|
$
|
4,081,339
|
$
|
3,129,479
|
||||
Gross
realized losses
|
$
|
(1,462,183
|
)
|
$
|
(3,264,522
|
)
|
$
|
(1,415,505
|
)
|
|
Unrealized
gains (losses)
|
$
|
347,494
|
$
|
11,111
|
$
|
(92,236
|
)
|
F-8
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):
ADVERTISING:
The
Company expenses the cost of advertising and promotion as incurred. Advertising
costs charged to operations totaled $123,839, $163,007 and $163,007 in 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
INCOME
TAXES:
The
Company accounts for income
taxes pursuant to the asset and liability method which requires deferred
income tax assets and liabilities to be computed for temporary differences
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted
tax
laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected
to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary
to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The income
tax
provision or credit is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or
minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities (see
also Note 8).
STOCK
OPTIONS:
Effective
November 1, 2005, the Company accounted for any stock options in accordance
with
the recognition and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“FAS”) No 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“FAS 123(R)”),
which replaces FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock - Based Compensation, and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. FAS 123(R) requires
compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions, including
employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements. In
addition, the Company adheres to the guidance set forth within Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, which
provides the Staff’s views regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and
certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations with respect
to
the valuation of share-based payments for public companies.
Prior
to
November 1, 2005, the Company accounted for any stock options in accordance
with
APB No. 25 which employed the intrinsic value method of measuring compensation
cost. Accordingly, compensation expense would have been recognized for fixed
stock options if the exercise price of the option equaled or exceeded the fair
value of the underlying stock at the grant date (See Note 11).
EARNINGS
PER SHARE:
The
Company presents “basic’ and, if applicable, “diluted” earnings per common share
pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
128, “Earnings per Share” (“SFAS 128”) and certain other financial accounting
pronouncements. Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing
net
income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each
period. The calculation of diluted earnings per common share is similar to
that
of basic earnings per common share, except that the denominator is increased
to
include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding
if all potentially dilutitive common shares, such as those issuable upon the
exercise of stock options, were issued during the period.
F-9
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):
EARNINGS
PER SHARE (Continued):
The
weighted average common shares outstanding used in the computation of basic
earnings per share was 5,529,830, 4,721,327 and 3,999,650 for 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The weighted average common shares outstanding used in
the
computation of diluted earnings per share was 5,599,830, 4,776,757 and 3,999,650
for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts
payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these
instruments. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based
on
relevant market information about the financial instrument when available.
These
estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes
in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION:
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”). Under SAB
104, revenue is recognized at the point of passage to the customer of title
and
risk of loss, when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales
price is determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably
assured. The Company recognizes revenue at the time of shipment.
The
Company sells its products without the right of return. Returns and allowances
are recorded when a customer claims receipt of damaged goods. The Company in
turn seeks reimbursement from the shipper.
Slotting
fees: Certain retailers require the payment of slotting fees in order to obtain
space for the Company’s products on the retailer’s store shelves. The cost of
these fees is recognized at the earlier of the date cash is paid or a liability
to the retailer is created. These amounts are included in the determination
of
cost of goods sold.
Discounts:
The cost of these discounts are recognized at the date of the sale. These
amounts are included in the determination of net sales.
Volume-based
incentives: These incentives typically involve rebates or refunds of a specific
amount of cash consideration that are redeemable only if the reseller completes
a specified cumulative level of sales transactions. Under incentive programs
of
this nature, the Company estimates the anticipated cost of the rebate when
it
records the sale. These amounts are included in the determination of net
sales.
Cooperative
advertising: Under these arrangements, the Company will agree to reimburse
the
reseller for a portion of the costs incurred by the reseller to advertise and
promote certain of the Company’s products. The Company will recognize the cost
of cooperative advertising programs in the period in which the advertising
and
promotional activity first takes place. The costs of these incentives are
included in advertising expense.
F-10
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):
SHIPPING
AND HANDLING FEES AND COSTS:
In
accordance with EITF No. 00-10 “Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and
Costs”, revenue received from shipping and handling fees is reflected in net
sales. Costs associated with shipping product to customers aggregating
approximately $1,592,000, $1,358,000 and $1,197,000 for the years ended October
31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively is included in selling and administrative
expenses.
RECLASSIFICATIONS:
Prior
years financial statements have been reclassified to conform with current years
presentation.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments (“SFAS No. 155”)
In
February 2006, the FASB amended SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, with the
issuance of SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments”.
SFAS No. 155 resolves issues addressed in the earlier standards and is effective
for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an
entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets (“SFAS No. 156”)
In
March
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets”, which amended SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, with respect to the
accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities.
SFAS 156 permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or the
fair
value measurement method for each class of separately recognized servicing
assets or servicing liabilities. The application of this statement is not
expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statement
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS
157”)
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board issued a standard that
provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and
liabilities. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit)
assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand
the use of fair value in any new circumstances.
This
Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity
has
not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial
statements for an interim period within that fiscal year.
F-11
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued):
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R)
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board issued a standard that
provides improved financial reporting by requiring an employer to recognize
the
overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other
than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of
financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year
in
which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity or
changes in unrestricted net assets of a not-for-profit organization. This
Statement also improves financial reporting by requiring an employer to measure
the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of
financial position, with limited exceptions. This Statement amends Statement
87,
FASB Statement No. 88, Employers’
Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and
for Termination Benefits,
Statement 106, and FASB Statement No. 132 (revised 2003), Employers’
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,
and
other related accounting literature. The required date of adoption of the
recognition and disclosure provisions of this Statement differs for an employer
that is an issuer of publicly traded equity securities (as defined) and an
employer that is not. An employer with publicly traded equity securities is
required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit
postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of
the
fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006.
SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin 108 (“SAB 108”), Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Qualifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements
In
September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
"Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements." SAB 108 was issued in
order
to eliminate the diversity of practice surrounding how public companies quantify
financial statement misstatements.
Traditionally,
there have been two widely-recognized methods for quantifying the effects of
financial statement misstatements: the “roll-over” method and the “iron curtain”
method. The roll-over method focuses primarily on the impact of a misstatement
on the income statement—including the reversing effect of prior year
misstatements—but its use can lead to the accumulation of misstatements in the
balance sheet. The iron-curtain method, on the other hand, focuses primarily
on
the effect of correcting the period-end balance sheet with less emphasis on
the
reversing effects of prior year errors on the income statement.
In
SAB
108, the SEC staff established an approach that requires quantification of
financial statement misstatements based on the effects of the misstatements
on
each of the company's financial statements and the related financial statement
disclosures.
F-12
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued):
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued):
This
model is commonly referred to as a "dual approach" because it requires
quantification of errors under both the iron curtain and the roll-over methods.
SAB 108 permits existing public companies to initially apply its provisions
either by (i) restating prior financial statements as if the "dual approach"
had
always been used or (ii) recording the cumulative effect of initially applying
the "dual approach" as adjustments to the carrying values of assets and
liabilities as of January 1, 2006 with an offsetting adjustment recorded to
the
opening balance of retained earnings.
Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (“FIN 48”)
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN
48),
which provides clarification related to the process associated with accounting
for uncertain tax positions recognized in consolidated financial statements.
FIN
48 prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken,
in
a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance related to, among other things,
classification, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax
positions, and disclosure requirements. We are required to adopt FIN 48 on
November 1, 2007, although early adoption is permitted. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our consolidated financial
statements.
F-13
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
3 - FORMATION
OF SUBSIDIARY - GENERATIONS COFFEE COMPANY, LLC:
The
Company and PMD Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Caruso’s Coffee, (“Caruso”)) formed GCC
on April 7, 2006. GCC engages in the roasting, packaging and sale of private
label specialty coffees for sale and distribution, throughout the United States.
The initial capital contribution by the Company was cash aggregating $328,388
and by Caruso, the use of equipment and plant/warehouse space. The Company
and
Caruso share in profits and losses in the ratio of 60:40 and initial membership
interests are 600 shares and 400 shares, respectively. The agreement provides
for an increase of capital contribution by Caruso to make each partner equal
and
to share equally a 50% ratio in profits and losses. The operations of GCC have
been consolidated with the Company from the commencement of operations to
October 31, 2006.
NOTE
4 - FORMATION
OF JOINT VENTURE - CAFÉ LA RICA, LLC:
The
Company and Coffee Bean Trading-Roasting LLC (“CBT”) formed CLR on March 10,
2006. The purpose of CLR is to engage in the roasting, packaging and sale of
branded coffee products in the Southeastern United States markets. CLR was
funded by an initial cash contribution of $250,000 by the Company. In addition,
the Company contributed cash in order to purchase equipment valued at $335,709
and CBT contributed equipment, and inventory of coffee and packaging materials
valued at $119,316. The Company and CBT also contributed their respective
intellectual property which had minimal value consisting of licenses for the
use
of the Company’s Café Caribe trademark and CBT’s Café La Rica trademark per
separate licensing agreements. The trademarks are licensed to CLR as exclusive,
non-assignable, non-transferable, royalty free rights to use them worldwide
in
connection with manufacture, packaging, sale, marketing and distribution of
the
licensed products (as defined) within the territory (as defined) in the
respective agreements. The Company and CBT each have a 50% allocation in the
profits and losses of CLR. CLR is being accounted for under the equity method
of
accounting.
Separate
agreements were entered into between the Company and CLR for the Company to
provide administrative services to CLR for a fee, to sell CLR with coffee
inventory and to pay CLR a roasting fee for all coffee roasted and sold as
one
of the Company’s proprietary brands, for which CLR will not receive a share of
profits. CLR also engages in roasting other non-company brands coffee for which
the profits/losses will be shared by both partners. Administrative changes
by
the Company to the joint venture for the period ended October 31, 2006
aggregated $44,403.
F-14
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
4 - FORMATION
OF JOINT VENTURE - CAFÉ LA RICA, LLC (Continued):
The
following represents condensed financial information of Café La Rica, LLC as of
October 31, 2006 and date of commencement to October 31, 2006.
Current
assets
|
$
|
406,041
|
||
Machinery
and other assets
|
481,023
|
|||
Total
assets
|
$
|
887,064
|
||
Current
liabilities
|
$
|
569,057
|
||
Other
liabilities
|
3,926
|
|||
Capital
|
314,081
|
|||
Total
liabilities and capital
|
$
|
887,064
|
||
Sales
|
$
|
903,242
|
||
Expenses
|
1,257,064
|
|||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(353,822
|
)
|
|
Company’s
share of net loss
|
$
|
(176,911
|
)
|
NOTE
5 - INVENTORIES:
Inventories
at October 31, 2006 and October 31, 2005 consisted of the
following:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Packed
coffee
|
$
|
700,284
|
$
|
1,276,050
|
|||
Green
coffee
|
1,466,161
|
2,483,061
|
|||||
Packaging
supplies
|
733,098
|
737,467
|
|||||
Totals
|
$
|
2,899,543
|
$
|
4,496,578
|
F-15
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
6 - PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT:
Property
and equipment at October 31, 2006 and 2005 consisted of the
following:
Estimated
Useful
Life
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Building
and improvements
|
30
years
|
$
|
1,401,016
|
$
|
1,393,516
|
|||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
7
years
|
3,853,272
|
3,784,129
|
|||||||
Machinery
and equipment under capital lease
|
7
years
|
458,179
|
458,179
|
|||||||
Automobile
|
3
years
|
84,925
|
43,617
|
|||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
7
years
|
359,833
|
287,035
|
|||||||
6,157,225
|
5,966,476
|
|||||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
4,159,274
|
3,727,524
|
||||||||
1,997,951
|
2,238,952
|
|||||||||
Land
|
141,000
|
141,000
|
||||||||
$
|
2,138,951
|
$
|
2,379,952
|
Depreciation
expense totaled $431,750, $373,106 and $363,612 in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. As of October 31, 2006 the Company has paid $328,388 as a deposit
towards the purchase of equipment to be used at GCC.
NOTE
7 - LINE
OF CREDIT:
The
Company has a financing agreement with Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services
Inc. which was originally entered into in November 2004 and amended in March
2005 for a line of credit of up to $4,000,000. The line of credit is secured
by
a blanket lien on all the assets of the Company and the personal guarantees
of
two of the Company’s officer/shareholders, requires monthly interest payments at
a rate of LIBOR plus 2.4% (7.47% at October 31, 2006 and 6.23% at October 31,
2005) and requires the Company to comply with various financial covenants.
The
agreement expires on October 31, 2007. As of October 31, 2006 and 2005, the
Company was in compliance with all financial covenants. As of October 31, 2006
and 2005, the borrowing under the line of credit was $2,542,881 and $1,063,167,
respectively.
In
April
2005, the Company entered into an additional term loan with Merrill Lynch
Business Financial Services Inc. in order to finance the purchase of roasting
equipment. This term loan was paid in full prior to October 31,
2005.
F-16
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
8 - INCOME
TAXES:
The tax
effects of the temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets
and liabilities as of October 31,
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$
|
167,000
|
$
|
168,855
|
|||
Inventory
|
54,000
|
149,745
|
|||||
$
|
221,000
|
$
|
318,600
|
||||
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|||||||
Fixed
assets
|
$
|
12,300
|
$
|
53,700
|
The Company’s
provision (benefit) for income taxes in 2006, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the
following:
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Federal
- current
|
$
|
430,211
|
$
|
726,364
|
$
|
497,421
|
||||
Federal
- deferred
|
37,800
|
(134,700
|
)
|
(29,072
|
)
|
|||||
State
and local - current
|
112,648
|
172,489
|
232,174
|
|||||||
State
and local - deferred
|
21,400
|
(38,500
|
)
|
(7,328
|
)
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
602,059
|
$
|
725,653
|
$
|
693,195
|
A
reconciliation of the difference between the expected income tax rate using
the
statutory federal tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate is as
follows:
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Federal
income tax statutory rate
|
34
|
%
|
34
|
%
|
34
|
%
|
||||
State
income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
6
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
8
|
%
|
||||
Other
- benefit of tax refunds
|
-
|
%
|
-
|
%
|
2
|
%
|
||||
Effective
tax rate
|
40
|
%
|
42
|
%
|
44
|
%
|
F-17
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
9 - COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
OPERATING
LEASES:
a)
|
The
Company occupies warehouse facilities under an operating lease, which
was
set to expire on August 31, 2006. The lease was renegotiated effective
February 2006 for a term of five years, expiring on January 31, 2011,
at a
monthly rental of $15,000. The lease requires the Company to pay
utilities
and other maintenance expenses. Rent charged to operations amounted
to
$161,000, $90,000 and $59,030 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
The
Company also uses a variety of independent, bonded commercial warehouses to
store its green coffee beans.
b)
|
In
February 2004, the Company entered into a lease for office and warehouse
space in La Junta City, Colorado. This lease, which is at a monthly
rental
of $8,341 beginning January 2005, expires on January 31,
2024.
|
The
aggregate minimum future lease payments as of October 31, 2006 for each of
the
next five years and thereafter are as follows:
October
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
280,093
|
||
2008
|
280,093
|
|||
2009
|
280,093
|
|||
2010
|
280,093
|
|||
2011
|
145,093
|
|||
Thereafter
|
1,326,232
|
|||
|
||||
$
|
2,591,697
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS:
The
Company is a party to various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management,
these actions are routine in nature and will not have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s financial statements in subsequent years.
401
(K) RETIREMENT PLAN:
The
Company has a 401(k) Retirement Plan, which covers all the full time employees
who have completed one year of service and have reached their 21st
birthday. The Company matches 100% of the aggregate salary reduction
contribution up to the first 3% of compensation and 50% of aggregate
contribution of the next 2% of compensation. Contributions to the plan
aggregated $54,807, $53,350 and $12,500 for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
F-18
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
9 - COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued):
MARKETING
AGREEMENT:
In
May
2005, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with a marketing firm.
The
Company paid the firm $8,000 per month and at closing, issued 10,000 shares
of
stock valued at $24,650 for services rendered. As of October 31, 2006, this
agreement has been terminated.
NOTE
10 - CONCENTRATION
OF CREDIT RISK:
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, commodities held at
broker and trade accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash and cash
equivalents in bank and brokerage accounts, the balances of which, at times,
may
exceed Federal insurance limits. Although at October 31, 2006 and 2005 the
Company did have cash balances that exceeded the Federal insurance limits,
they
have not experienced any losses in such accounts and monitor the soundness
of
the financial institutions on a periodic basis. The net balance of the Company’s
investments in derivative financial instruments also represents commodities
held
at broker. Exposure to credit risk is reduced by placing such deposits and
investments with major financial institutions and monitoring their credit
ratings.
Approximately
30% and 6% of the Company’s sales were derived from two customers in 2006. Those
customers also accounted for approximately $777,000 and $241,000 of the
Company’s accounts receivable balance as of October 31, 2006. Approximately 28%
and 8% of the Company’s sales were derived from two customers in 2005. Those
customers also accounted for approximately $314,000 and $249,000 of the
Company’s account receivable balance at October 31, 2005. Approximately 22% and
11% of the Company’s sales were derived from two customers in 2004. Those
customers also accounted for approximately $400,000 and $458,000 of the
Company’s accounts receivable balance as of October 31, 2004. Concentration of
credit risk with respect to other trade receivables are limited due to the
short
payment terms generally extended by the Company; by ongoing credit evaluations
of customers; and by maintaining an allowance for doubtful accounts that
management believes will adequately provide for credit losses.
Management
does not believe that credit risk was significant at October 31, 2006 and
2005.
NOTE
11 - STOCK
OPTION PLAN:
On
February 10, 1998, the Company’s stockholders consented to the adoption of the
Company’s stock option plan (the “Plan”) whereby incentive and/or non-incentive
stock options for the purchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock may be granted to the Company’s directors, officers, other key employees
and consultants. Under the Plan, the exercise price of all options must be
at
least 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant
(the exercise price of an incentive stock option for an optionee that holds
more
than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company
must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant). On June
21, 2004, the plan was amended to reduce the number of shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under the plan from 2,000,000 to 800,000, subject to
adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, mergers,
recapitalizations or other capital adjustments.
As
of
October 31, 2006 no options had been granted under the Plan, since its
inception.
F-19
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
12 - MAJOR
VENDORS/RELATED PARTY:
During
fiscal 2006, 77% of the Company’s purchases were from ten vendors. Two of these
vendors accounted for 30% and 10% of total purchases, respectively. These two
vendors accounted for approximately $605,000 and $410,000 of the Company’s
accounts payable at October 31, 2006 respectively.
During
fiscal 2005, 85% of the Company’s purchases were from ten vendors. Two of these
vendors accounted for 43% and 8% of total purchases, respectively. These two
vendors accounted for approximately $1,457,000 and $165,000 of the Company’s
accounts payable at October 31, 2005, respectively.
During
fiscal 2004, 81% of the Company’s purchases were from ten vendors. Two of these
vendors accounted for 34% and 11% of total purchases, respectively. These two
vendors accounted for approximately $1,028,000 and $246,000 of the Company’s
accounts payable at October 31, 2004, respectively.
In
addition, an employee of one of these vendors is a director of the Company.
Purchases from that vendor totaled approximately $13,841,000, $12,969,000 and
$6,075,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Management does not believe
that the loss of any one vendor would have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s operations due to the availability of many alternate
suppliers.
NOTE
13 - NON-QUALIFIED
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN:
In
January 2005, the Company established the “Coffee Holding Co., Inc.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.” Currently, there is only one
participant in the plan. Within the plan guidelines, this employee is deferring
a portion of his current salary and bonus.
NOTE
14 - SALE
OF COMMON STOCK:
The
Company entered into an agreement with Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”) for Maxim to
serve as the Company’s financial advisors and lead managing underwriter for a
public offering of the Company’s common stock. Subsequently, Maxim and Joseph
Stevens & Company, Inc. (“Joseph Stevens”) entered into an agreement
pursuant to which Joseph Stevens agreed to act as managing underwriter and
Maxim
agreed to participate in the underwriting syndicate for the offering.
The
offering of 1,400,000 shares concluded on May 6, 2005 and on June 16, 2005
the
underwriters exercised their right to purchase 210,000 additional shares of
common stock (the over-allotment option) at the public offering price less
the
underwriting discount (ten percent). An aggregate of 1,610,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock were sold in the offering at a price of $5.00 per share.
The Company paid $25,000 to Maxim upon the filing of a registration statement
for the offering with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
which amount was split between Joseph Stevens and Maxim. The Company also paid
to Joseph Stevens and Maxim a non-accountable expense allowance less amounts
previously paid to Maxim, equal to three percent of the gross proceeds derived
from the public offering. The Company also sold to Joseph Stevens and Maxim
for
$100, warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at a price of $6.00
per
share. The fair market value of these warrants was charged and credited to
additional paid-in capital. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five
years and contain provisions for cashless exercise, anti-dilution and piggyback
registration rights.
During
2005, a former shareholder returned 89,820 shares of common stock for no
consideration.
F-20
COFFEE
HOLDING CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
31, 2006, 2005 AND 2004
NOTE
15 - QUARTERLY
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
The
following table presents unaudited quarterly results of operations for the
four
quarters ended October 31, 2006 and 2005. We believe that all necessary
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included
in the amounts stated below to present fairly such quarterly information.
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
||||||||||
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
13,844,845
|
$
|
12,010,928
|
$
|
11,858,581
|
$
|
13,456,848
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
2,325,443
|
862,694
|
1,941,651
|
2,465,451
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
906,631
|
(492,969
|
)
|
385,843
|
564,802
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
519,638
|
(284,234
|
)
|
179,450
|
285,228
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
.09
|
$
|
(.05
|
)
|
$
|
.03
|
$
|
.05
|
||||
|
|||||||||||||
2005
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
8,060,280
|
$
|
10,173,230
|
$
|
10,782,680
|
$
|
12,529,155
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
2,072,267
|
2,252,858
|
1,033,458
|
2,310,789
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
676,881
|
1,003,371
|
(792,607
|
)
|
1,083,464
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
402,281
|
598,356
|
(447,875
|
)
|
632,373
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
$
|
.10
|
$
|
.15
|
$
|
(.08
|
)
|
$
|
.13
|
F-21
Schedule
II
Coffee
Holding Co., Inc.
Valuation
and qualifying accounts
for
the years ended October 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
(a)
Description
|
(b)
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
|
(c)
Additions Charged to (reversed from) Costs and
Expenses
|
(d)
Deductions - Net Write-Offs
|
(e)
Balance at End of Year
|
|||||||||
Year
Ended October 31, 2006:
|
|||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts on
trade
receivables
|
$
|
420,349
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
420,349
|
|||||
Year
Ended October 31, 2005:
|
|||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubt accounts on
trade
receivables
|
$
|
150,349
|
$
|
270,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
420,349
|
|||||
Year
Ended October 31, 2004:
|
|||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts on
trade
receivables
|
$
|
119,435
|
$
|
30,914
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
150,349
|