COGNEX CORP - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
or
o | Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 0-17869
COGNEX CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts | 04-2713778 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
One Vision Drive
Natick, Massachusetts 01760-2059
(508) 650-3000
Natick, Massachusetts 01760-2059
(508) 650-3000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of October 28, 2007, there were 43,321,700 shares of Common Stock, $.002 par value, of the
registrant outstanding.
INDEX
Table of Contents
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | October 1, | September 30, | October 1, | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
$ | 49,196 | $ | 52,249 | $ | 142,834 | $ | 163,250 | ||||||||
Service |
5,549 | 5,756 | 17,582 | 16,869 | ||||||||||||
54,745 | 58,005 | 160,416 | 180,119 | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Product (1) |
11,278 | 12,031 | 36,087 | 38,055 | ||||||||||||
Service (1) |
3,340 | 3,416 | 10,933 | 10,695 | ||||||||||||
14,618 | 15,447 | 47,020 | 48,750 | |||||||||||||
Gross margin |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
37,918 | 40,218 | 106,747 | 125,195 | ||||||||||||
Service |
2,209 | 2,340 | 6,649 | 6,174 | ||||||||||||
40,127 | 42,558 | 113,396 | 131,369 | |||||||||||||
Research, development, and engineering expenses (1) |
8,704 | 7,997 | 24,654 | 24,496 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses (1) |
24,303 | 23,414 | 72,870 | 72,470 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
7,120 | 11,147 | 15,872 | 34,403 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency gain (loss) |
353 | (282 | ) | (88 | ) | (707 | ) | |||||||||
Investment and other income |
1,881 | 1,518 | 5,597 | 4,856 | ||||||||||||
Income before income tax expense |
9,354 | 12,383 | 21,381 | 38,552 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2,011 | 2,267 | 5,576 | 8,202 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,343 | $ | 10,116 | $ | 15,805 | $ | 30,350 | ||||||||
Net income per common and common-equivalent share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||
Weighted-average common and common-equivalent
shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
43,286 | 44,825 | 43,859 | 45,905 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
43,506 | 45,682 | 44,257 | 47,086 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per common share |
$ | 0.085 | $ | 0.085 | $ | 0.255 | $ | 0.245 | ||||||||
(1) Amounts include stock-based compensation
expense, as follows: |
||||||||||||||||
Product cost of revenue |
$ | 138 | $ | 191 | $ | 450 | $ | 544 | ||||||||
Service cost of revenue |
140 | 222 | 417 | 650 | ||||||||||||
Research, development, and engineering |
723 | 941 | 2,268 | 2,671 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative |
1,723 | 2,121 | 5,110 | 6,071 | ||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 2,724 | $ | 3,475 | $ | 8,245 | $ | 9,936 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 107,343 | $ | 87,361 | ||||
Short-term investments |
87,824 | 128,319 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, less reserves of
$1,280 and $1,662 in 2007 and 2006,
respectively |
39,687 | 40,055 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
30,048 | 30,583 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
8,446 | 8,636 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
16,069 | 18,127 | ||||||
Total current assets |
289,417 | 313,081 | ||||||
Long-term investments |
70,200 | 50,540 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
26,327 | 26,028 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
18,959 | 9,002 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
41,023 | 44,988 | ||||||
Goodwill |
84,621 | 83,318 | ||||||
Other assets |
8,384 | 1,694 | ||||||
$ | 538,931 | $ | 528,651 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,551 | $ | 6,463 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
34,548 | 31,064 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
5,030 | 1,181 | ||||||
Deferred revenue and customer deposits |
15,184 | 7,726 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
59,313 | 46,434 | ||||||
Reserve for income taxes |
17,913 | 8,367 | ||||||
Commitments (Notes 3, 7, 8, 9, and 13) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.002 par value
Authorized: 140,000 shares,
issued: 43,322 and 44,403 shares in 2007 and
2006, respectively |
87 | 89 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
137,377 | 155,136 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
329,820 | 329,251 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(5,579 | ) | (10,626 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
461,705 | 473,850 | ||||||
$ | 538,931 | $ | 528,651 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Par Value | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Income | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
44,403 | $ | 89 | $ | 155,136 | $ | 329,251 | $ | (10,626 | ) | $ | 473,850 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under stock option
and stock purchase plans |
349 | 1 | 6,453 | 6,454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
8,245 | 8,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock option
exercises |
203 | 203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(1,430 | ) | (3 | ) | (32,660 | ) | (32,663 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends |
(11,215 | ) | (11,215 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reduction in retained earnings related to the
adoption of FIN 48 (Note 9) |
(4,021 | ) | (4,021 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
15,805 | $ | 15,805 | 15,805 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Losses on currency swaps, net of gains
on long-term intercompany loans, net of
tax of $220 |
(375 | ) | (375 | ) | (375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale
investments, net of tax of $128 |
218 | 218 | 218 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
5,204 | 5,204 | 5,204 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 20,852 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2007 (unaudited) |
43,322 | $ | 87 | $ | 137,377 | $ | 329,820 | $ | (5,579 | ) | $ | 461,705 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | October 1, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 15,805 | $ | 30,350 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
8,245 | 9,936 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,494 | 8,702 | ||||||
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory |
2,627 | 301 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises |
(203 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(5,566 | ) | (5,822 | ) | ||||
Deposit related to Japan tax audit (Note 9) |
(6,336 | ) | | |||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
12,931 | (831 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
35,997 | 41,435 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of investments |
(220,467 | ) | (351,528 | ) | ||||
Maturity and sale of investments |
240,571 | 413,210 | ||||||
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment |
(3,307 | ) | (3,231 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(502 | ) | (3,188 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
16,295 | 55,263 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock under stock option and
stock purchase plans |
6,454 | 9,198 | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(32,663 | ) | (81,296 | ) | ||||
Payment of dividends |
(11,215 | ) | (11,267 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises |
203 | 1,201 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(37,221 | ) | (82,164 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
4,911 | 2,160 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
19,982 | 16,694 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
87,361 | 72,856 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 107,343 | $ | 89,550 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q, these notes are condensed and do not contain all disclosures required by generally
accepted accounting principles. Reference should be made to the consolidated financial statements
and related notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006.
In the opinion of the management of Cognex Corporation (the Company), the accompanying
consolidated unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal,
recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position at September
30, 2007, and the results of its operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, and changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the
periods presented.
The results disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year.
NOTE 2: New Pronouncements
FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and
liabilities at fair value. This Statement is effective for the Companys fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, although earlier adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this
Statement to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments consisted of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Cash |
$ | 107,343 | $ | 84,361 | ||||
Cash equivalents |
| 3,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
107,343 | 87,361 | ||||||
Municipal
bonds |
87,824 | 108,332 | ||||||
Commercial
paper |
| 15,988 | ||||||
Agency
notes |
| 3,999 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
87,824 | 128,319 | ||||||
Municipal
bonds |
60,777 | 39,594 | ||||||
Limited partnership interest
(accounted for using cost
method) |
9,423 | 10,946 | ||||||
Long-term
investments |
70,200 | 50,540 | ||||||
$ | 265,367 | $ | 266,220 | |||||
5
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments (continued)
In June 2000, Cognex Corporation became a Limited Partner in Venrock Associates III, L.P.
(Venrock), a venture capital fund. A Director of the Company is a Managing General Partner of
Venrock Associates. The Company has committed to a total investment in the limited partnership of
up to $20,500,000 with an expiration date of December 31, 2010.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had contributed $19,488,000 to the partnership. During the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company made $1,025,000 in contributions to the
partnership, and received $2,548,000 of distributions from the partnership that were accounted for
as a return of capital. No contributions were made to the partnership or distributions received
from the partnership during the quarter ended September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2007, the
carrying value of this investment was $9,423,000 compared to an estimated fair value, as determined
by the General Partner, of $12,280,000.
NOTE 4: Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 15,998 | $ | 16,746 | ||||
Work-in-process |
1,362 | 1,630 | ||||||
Finished goods |
12,688 | 12,207 | ||||||
$ | 30,048 | $ | 30,583 | |||||
The Company periodically reviews inventory quantities on hand and estimates excess and obsolescence
exposures based upon assumptions about future demand, product transitions, and market conditions,
and records reserves to reduce the carrying value of inventories to their net realizable value. In
the second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded provisions for excess and obsolete MVSD inventory
totaling $2,126,000 resulting from lower actual demand than was previously estimated as part of the
Companys material requirements forecasts, together with lower estimates of future demand from both
semiconductor and electronics capital equipment and discrete factory automation customers.
Provisions of $303,000 and $285,000 were also recorded in the first and third quarters of 2007,
respectively.
When inventory has been written down below cost, such reduced amount is considered the new cost
basis for subsequent accounting purposes. As a result, the Company may recognize a higher than
normal gross margin if the reserved inventory is subsequently sold. The Company recognized
benefits to cost of product revenue from the sale of reserved inventory for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 of $164,000 and $436,000, respectively, and $298,000
and $902,000 for the same periods in 2006.
6
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4: Inventories (continued)
The changes in the excess and obsolete inventory reserve during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 were as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
$ | 10,822 | ||
Provisions for excess and obsolete inventory |
2,714 | |||
Inventory sold to customers |
(382 | ) | ||
Inventory sold to brokers |
(2,573 | ) | ||
Scrap of reserved inventory |
(3,059 | ) | ||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
659 | |||
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
$ | 8,181 | ||
In addition to reserves against existing inventory, in 2001 the Company accrued $1,400,000 related
to inventory purchase commitments. A favorable settlement or outcome of these purchase commitments
would result in a recovery of a portion of this accrual.
NOTE 5: Intangible Assets
Amortized intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
Gross | Net | |||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | ||||||||||
September 30, 2007 | Amount | Amortization | Amount | |||||||||
Distribution networks |
$ | 38,060 | $ | 7,941 | $ | 30,119 | ||||||
Customer contracts and relationships |
13,491 | 5,392 | 8,099 | |||||||||
Completed technologies |
6,742 | 4,463 | 2,279 | |||||||||
Other |
1,434 | 908 | 526 | |||||||||
$ | 59,727 | $ | 18,704 | $ | 41,023 | |||||||
Gross | Net | |||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | ||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | Amount | Amortization | Amount | |||||||||
Distribution networks |
$ | 38,060 | $ | 5,477 | $ | 32,583 | ||||||
Customer contracts and relationships |
13,002 | 4,110 | 8,892 | |||||||||
Completed technologies |
6,834 | 4,086 | 2,748 | |||||||||
Other |
1,422 | 657 | 765 | |||||||||
$ | 59,318 | $ | 14,330 | $ | 44,988 | |||||||
The cost and related accumulated amortization of certain fully-amortized completed technologies
totaling $150,000 were removed from the accounts during the first quarter of 2007. Aggregate
amortization expense for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 was
$1,411,000 and $4,224,000, respectively, and $1,487,000 and $4,406,000 for the same periods in
2006.
7
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5: Intangible Assets (continued)
Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of the current fiscal year and succeeding fiscal
years is as follows (in thousands):
Year | Amount | |||
2007 |
1,457 | |||
2008 |
5,682 | |||
2009 |
5,493 | |||
2010 |
5,364 | |||
2011 |
4,434 | |||
Thereafter |
18,593 | |||
Total |
$ | 41,023 | ||
NOTE 6: Goodwill
The Company has two reporting units with goodwill, the Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) and
the Surface Inspection Systems Division (SISD), which are also reportable segments.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the nine-month period ended September 30,
2007 were as follows (in thousands):
MVSD | SISD | Consolidated | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
$ | 80,485 | $ | 2,833 | $ | 83,318 | ||||||
AssistWare contingent payment (Note 13) |
502 | | 502 | |||||||||
IRS settlement relating to DVT acquisition (Note 9) |
179 | | 179 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
424 | 198 | 622 | |||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
$ | 81,590 | $ | 3,031 | $ | 84,621 | ||||||
NOTE 7: Warranty Obligations
The Company warrants its hardware products to be free from defects in material and workmanship for
periods ranging from six months to two years from the time of sale based upon the product being
purchased and the terms of the customers contract. Estimated warranty obligations are evaluated
and recorded at the time of sale based upon historical costs to fulfill warranty obligations.
Provisions may also be recorded subsequent to the time of sale whenever specific events or
circumstances impacting product quality become known that would not have been taken into account
using historical data. Warranty obligations are included in Accrued Expenses on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
The changes in the warranty obligation were as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
$ | 1,387 | ||
Provisions for warranties issued during the period |
1,585 | |||
Fulfillment of warranty obligations |
(1,620 | ) | ||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
57 | |||
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
$ | 1,409 | ||
8
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8: Indemnification Provisions
Except as limited by Massachusetts law, the by-laws of the Company require it to indemnify certain
current or former directors, officers, and employees of the Company against expenses incurred by
them in connection with each proceeding in which he or she is involved as a result of serving or
having served in certain capacities. Indemnification is not available with respect to a proceeding
as to which it has been adjudicated that the person did not act in good faith in the reasonable
belief that the action was in the best interests of the Company. The maximum potential amount of
future payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions is unlimited. The
Company has never incurred significant costs related to these indemnification provisions. As a
result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal.
The Company accepts standard limited indemnification provisions in the ordinary course of business,
whereby it indemnifies its customers for certain direct damages incurred in connection with
third-party patent or other intellectual property infringement claims with respect to the use of
the Companys products. The term of these indemnification provisions generally coincides with the
customers use of the Companys products. The maximum potential amount of future payments the
Company could be required to make under these provisions is generally subject to fixed monetary
limits. The Company has never incurred significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims
related to these indemnification provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair
value of these provisions is minimal.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company also accepts limited indemnification provisions
from time to time, whereby it indemnifies customers for certain direct damages incurred in
connection with bodily injury and property damage arising from the installation of the Companys
products. The term of these indemnification provisions generally coincides with the period of
installation. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to
make under these provisions is generally limited and is likely recoverable under the Companys
insurance policies. As a result of this coverage, and the fact that the Company has never incurred
significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions,
the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal.
NOTE 9: Income Taxes
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). FIN 48 supersedes SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, as it relates to income
tax liabilities and lowers the minimum threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements from probable to more likely than not (i.e., a
likelihood of occurrence greater than fifty percent). Under FIN 48, the recognition threshold is
met when an entity concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more
likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority.
Those tax positions failing to qualify for initial recognition are recognized in the first interim
period in which they meet the more likely than not standard, or are resolved through negotiation or
litigation with the taxing authority, or upon expiration of the statute of limitations.
Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized occurs when an entity subsequently
determines that a tax position no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being
sustained.
Differences between the amounts recognized in the financial statements prior to the adoption of FIN
48 and the amounts recognized after adoption are accounted for as a cumulative effect adjustment
recorded to the beginning balance of retained earnings. As required, the Company adopted FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007, and as a result, recognized a $4,021,000 increase in liabilities and a corresponding
reduction to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance for uncertain tax positions that existed
at December 31, 2006, but previously did not meet the requirements for liability recognition under SFAS No.
5. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized a $1,089,000
increase in liabilities for uncertain tax positions as part of its income tax accrual, of which
$379,000 was recognized in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007. Estimated interest and
penalties included in these amounts
9
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 9: Income Taxes (continued)
totaled $592,000 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, of which $180,000 was included
in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007.
Under FIN 48, only the portion of the liability that is expected to be paid within one year is
classified as a current liability. As a result, liabilities expected to be resolved without the
payment of cash (e.g., resolution due to the expiration of the statute of limitations) or are not
expected to be paid within one year are not classified as current. The Company reclassified
$8,367,000 of current liabilities for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2006 to
non-current liabilities to conform to the balance sheet presentation requirements of FIN 48. All
of the Companys liabilities for uncertain tax positions are classified as non-current liabilities
at September 30, 2007. These liabilities include $2,763,000 of estimated interest and penalties,
for which it is the Companys policy to record as income tax expense.
The tax years 1999 through 2006 remain open to examination by various taxing authorities in the
jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The Company is currently under audit in two
jurisdictions, the United States and Japan. The Internal Revenue Service is auditing tax
years 2003 through 2006. The Company believes that it will conclude this audit within the next
twelve months and if the Companys tax positions are sustained, this would result in a reduction in income tax expense. An estimate
of the range of possible changes to existing reserves cannot be made at this time. The Tokyo
Regional Taxation Bureau is auditing tax years 2002 through 2005 and has recently issued a finding
that a permanent establishment exists with the Companys Irish subsidiary. The Company believes it
has a substantive defense against this finding and is preparing to request Competent Authority
intervention in accordance with the Japan/Ireland tax treaty. It is not expected that this audit
will be concluded within the next twelve months. To avoid further interest and penalties, the
Company has paid tax, interest, and penalties through the date of assessment of 766,257,300 Yen (or
approximately $6,631,000 based on the exchange rate as of September 30, 2007) to the Japanese tax
authorities. This amount is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The changes in the reserve for income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
$ | 8,367 | ||
Cumulative effect upon adoption of FIN 48 |
4,021 | |||
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
12,388 | |||
Provisions during the period |
1,089 | |||
Gross-up of FIN 48 liabilities |
4,436 | |||
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
$ | 17,913 | ||
During the third quarter of 2007, the Company reclassified $4,436,000 that was previously netted
against the reserve for income taxes to non-current deferred tax assets to present FIN 48
liabilities at a gross amount, as opposed to net of any correlative tax relief.
The Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $16,427,000 and $17,913,000 at January 1, 2007 and
September 30, 2007, respectively, of which $1,000,000 would reduce goodwill and the remainder would
reduce income tax expense, if recognized. The third quarter of 2007 included the following discrete tax events: a reduction of tax expense
of $444,000 from the final true-up of the prior years tax accrual upon filing the actual tax
returns and a $51,000 reduction of tax expense upon the favorable settlement of an Internal Revenue Service
audit relating to the DVT acquisition and upon the expiration of the statute of limitations for
certain state tax issues, partially offset by a $74,000 increase to tax expense for certain state
tax issues. The second quarter of 2007 included an increase to tax expense of $438,000 due to the
final adjustment to the U.S. tax returns related to the settlement in the third quarter of 2006 of
the case brought by the Tokyo Regional
10
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 9: Income Taxes (continued)
Taxation Bureau against the Companys US subsidiary for tax years 1997 through 2001. There
were no discrete tax events in the first quarter of 2007.
NOTE 10: Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The Companys share-based payments that result in compensation expense consist solely of stock
option grants. At September 30, 2007, the Company had 8,823,962 shares available for grant under
two stock option plans: the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, 1,713,962; and the 2001 General Stock Option
Plan, 7,110,000. Each of these plans expires ten years from the date the plan was approved. The
Company has not granted any stock options from the 2001 General Stock Option Plan.
In April 1998, the shareholders approved the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, under which the Company
initially was able to grant stock options and stock awards to purchase up to 1,700,000 shares of
common stock. Effective January 1999 and each January 1st thereafter during the term of
the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the number of shares of common stock available for grants of stock
options and stock awards is increased automatically by an amount equal to 4.5% of the total number
of issued shares of common stock as of the close of business on December 31st of the
preceding year.
In April 2007, the shareholders approved the 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 2007
Plan). The 2007 Plan will take effect when the Companys 1998 Stock Incentive Plan expires in
February 2008. The 2007 Plan permits awards of stock options (both incentive and non-qualified
options), stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock. The maximum number of shares to be
issued under the 2007 Plan is 2,300,000 shares of the Companys common stock.
Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the
Companys common stock at the grant date, generally vest over four years based on continuous
service, and generally expire ten years from the grant date. Historically, the majority of the
Companys stock options have been granted during the first quarter of each year to reward existing
employees for their performance. In addition, the Company grants stock options throughout the year
for new employees and promotions.
The following is a summary of the Companys stock option activity for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007 (shares and values in thousands):
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Term (in years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
11,324 | $ | 25.90 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
1,425 | 21.65 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(346 | ) | 18.36 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or Expired |
(1,392 | ) | 26.50 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30,
2007 |
11,011 | $ | 25.51 | 6.2 | $ | 3,982 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30,
2007 |
7,399 | $ | 25.56 | 5.1 | $ | 3,982 | ||||||||||
The fair values of stock options granted after January 1, 2006 were estimated on the grant date
using a binomial lattice model. The fair values of options granted prior to January 1, 2006 were
estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The Company believes that a binomial lattice model
results in a better estimate of fair value because it identifies patterns of exercises based on
triggering events, tying the results to possible future events instead of a single path of actual
historical events. Management is responsible for determining the appropriate valuation model and
estimating these fair values, and in doing so, considered a number of factors, including
information provided by an outside valuation advisor.
11
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 10: Stock-Based Compensation Expense (continued)
The fair values of stock options granted in each period presented were estimated using the
following weighted-average assumptions:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | October 1, | September 30, | October 1, | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Risk-free rate |
4.6 | % | 4.9 | % | 4.9 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||||
Expected dividend yield |
1.80 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.11 | % | ||||||||
Expected volatility |
35 | % | 46 | % | 35 | % | 45 | % | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) |
4.3 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Risk-free rate
The risk-free rate was based on a treasury instrument whose term was consistent with the
contractual term of the option.
Expected dividend yield
The current dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the Companys
Board of Directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by the closing stock price on
the grant date. Although dividends are declared at the discretion of the Companys Board of
Directors, for this purpose, the Company anticipates continuing to pay a quarterly dividend that
approximates the current dividend yield.
Expected volatility
The
expected volatility was based on a combination of historical volatility of the Companys
common stock over the contractual term of the option and implied volatility for traded options of
the Companys stock.
Expected term
The expected term was derived from the binomial lattice model from the impact of events that
trigger exercises over time.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006 was $6.83 and $11.03, respectively. The Company
recognizes compensation expense using the graded attribution method, in which expense is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the service period for each separately vesting portion of the stock
option as if the option was, in substance, multiple awards.
The amount of compensation expense recognized at the end of the vesting period is based on the
number of stock options for which the requisite service has been completed. No compensation
expense is recognized for options that are forfeited for which the employee does not render the
requisite service. The term forfeitures is distinct from expirations and represents only the
unvested portion of the surrendered option. The Company currently expects that approximately 70%
of its stock options will actually vest, and therefore, has applied a weighted-average annual
forfeiture rate of 10% to all unvested options. This rate was revised during the quarter ended
April 1, 2007, and will be revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from this estimate. Ultimately, compensation
expense will only be recognized over the vesting period for those options that actually vest.
The total stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2007 was $2,724,000 and $896,000, respectively, and
$3,475,000 and $1,222,000 for the same periods in 2006. The total stock-based compensation expense
and the related income tax benefit recognized for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007
was $8,245,000 and $2,702,000, respectively, and $9,936,000 and $3,491,000 for the same periods in
2006. No compensation expense was capitalized at September 30, 2007 or October 1, 2006.
12
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 10: Stock-Based Compensation Expense (continued)
At September 30, 2007, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options
was $11,365,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
NOTE 11: Net Income Per Share
Net income per share was calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | October 1, | September 30, | October 1, | |||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,343 | $ | 10,116 | $ | 15,805 | $ | 30,350 | ||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
43,286 | 44,825 | 43,859 | 45,905 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
43,286 | 44,825 | 43,859 | 45,905 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
220 | 857 | 398 | 1,181 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average common and common-equivalent shares
outstanding |
43,506 | 45,682 | 44,257 | 47,086 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common and
common-equivalent share |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||
Stock options to purchase 10,149,292 and 8,729,239 shares of common stock were outstanding during
the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and 7,763,085 and
5,521,344 for the same periods in 2006 but were not included in the calculation of diluted net
income per common share because they were anti-dilutive.
NOTE 12: Segment Information
The Company has two reportable segments: the Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) and the Surface
Inspections Systems Division (SISD). MVSD designs, develops, manufactures, and markets modular
vision systems that are used to control the manufacturing of discrete items by locating,
identifying, inspecting, and measuring them during the manufacturing process. SISD designs,
develops, manufactures, and markets surface inspection vision systems that are used to inspect
surfaces of materials that are processed in a continuous fashion to ensure there are no flaws or
defects in the surfaces. Segments are determined based upon the way that management organizes its
business for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Company evaluates segment performance
based upon income or loss from operations, excluding unusual items and stock-based compensation
expense.
13
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 12: Segment Information (continued)
The following table summarizes information about the Companys segments (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Reconciling | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2007 | MVSD | SISD | Items | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 46,463 | $ | 2,733 | $ | | $ | 49,196 | |||||||||||
Service revenue |
3,206 | 2,343 | | 5,549 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
12,768 | (559 | ) | (5,089 | ) | 7,120 | |||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 132,973 | $ | 9,861 | $ | | $ | 142,834 | |||||||||||
Service revenue |
9,841 | 7,741 | | 17,582 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
32,631 | (1,250 | ) | (15,509 | ) | 15,872 | |||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Reconciling | ||||||||||||||||||
October 1, 2006 | MVSD | SISD | Items | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 48,216 | $ | 4,033 | $ | | $ | 52,249 | |||||||||||
Service revenue |
3,087 | 2,669 | | 5,756 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
16,151 | 720 | (5,724 | ) | 11,147 | ||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
October 1, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 148,564 | $ | 14,686 | $ | | $ | 163,250 | |||||||||||
Service revenue |
9,300 | 7,569 | | 16,869 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
50,043 | 2,531 | (18,171 | ) | 34,403 |
Reconciling items consist of stock-based compensation expense and unallocated corporate expenses,
which primarily include corporate headquarters costs and professional fees. For the nine-month
period ended October 1, 2006, corporate expenses also included costs associated with the Companys
25th Anniversary party. Asset information by segment is not produced internally for use
by the chief operating decision maker because the cash and investments are commingled and the
divisions share assets and resources in a number of locations around the world, and therefore, is
not presented.
NOTE 13: Acquisitions
AssistWare Technology, Inc.
In May 2006, the Company acquired AssistWare Technology, Inc. for $2,998,000 in cash paid at
closing, with the potential for an additional cash payment of up to $500,000 in the second quarter
of 2007, up to $500,000 in the fourth quarter of 2007, and up to $1,000,000 in the second quarter
of 2008 depending upon the achievement of certain performance criteria. The Company determined
that the contingent payment in the second quarter of 2007 had been earned and made a payment of $502,000 that was
allocated to goodwill. This payment included a $2,000 adjustment related to the final closing
balance sheet of AssistWare.
14
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 14: Dividends
On July 26, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.085 per share.
The dividend was paid on August 24, 2007 to all shareholders of record at the close of business on
August 10, 2007.
On October 26, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.085 per share.
The dividend is payable on November 30, 2007 to all shareholders of record at the close of
business on November 16, 2007. Future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Board of
Directors and will depend upon such factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements made in this report, as well as oral statements made by the Company from time to
time, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Readers
can identify these forward-looking statements by the Companys use of the words expects,
anticipates, estimates, believes, projects, intends, plans, will, may, shall, and
similar words and other statements of a similar sense. These statements are based upon the
Companys current estimates and expectations as to prospective events and circumstances, which may
or may not be in the Companys control and as to which there can be no firm assurances given.
These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such risks and uncertainties include:
(1) global economic conditions that impact the capital spending trends of manufacturers in a
variety of industries; (2) the cyclicality of the semiconductor and electronics industries; (3) the
inability to achieve significant international revenue; (4) fluctuations in foreign exchange rates;
(5) the loss of, or a significant curtailment of purchases by, any one or more principal customers;
(6) the reliance upon certain sole-source suppliers to manufacture and deliver critical components
for the Companys products; (7) the inability to attract and retain skilled employees; (8) the
inability to design and manufacture high-quality products; (9) the technological obsolescence of
current products and the inability to develop new products; (10) the failure to effectively manage
product transitions or accurately forecast customer demand; (11) the failure to properly manage the
distribution of products; (12) the inability to enter new commercial markets for machine vision
systems; (13) the inability to protect the Companys proprietary technology and intellectual
property; (14) the Companys involvement in time-consuming and costly litigation; (15) the impact
of competitive pressures; (16) the challenges in integrating acquired businesses; and (17) the
inability to achieve expected results from acquisitions. The foregoing list should not be
construed as exhaustive and the Company encourages readers to refer to the detailed discussion of
risk factors included in Part I Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company
cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date made. The Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise
forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or
circumstances after the date such statements are made.
Company Overview
Cognex Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and markets machine vision systems, or
computers that can see, which are used to automate a wide range of manufacturing processes where
vision is required. The Companys Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) specializes in machine
vision systems that are used to automate the manufacturing of discrete items, while the Companys
Surface Inspection Systems Division (SISD) specializes in machine vision systems that are used to
inspect the surfaces of materials processed in a continuous fashion.
In addition to product revenue derived from the sale of machine vision systems, the Company also
generates revenue by providing maintenance and support, training, consulting, and installation
services to its customers. The Companys customers can be classified into the following markets:
| Semiconductor and Electronics Capital Equipment Market: These manufacturers purchase Cognex machine vision systems and integrate them into the capital equipment that they manufacture and then sell to their customers in the semiconductor and electronics industries that |
16
Table of Contents
either make computer chips or make printed circuit boards containing computer chips.
Although the Company sells to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in a number of
industries, these semiconductor and electronics OEMs have historically been large consumers
of the Companys products. Demand from these capital equipment manufacturers is highly
cyclical, with periods of investment followed by temporary downturns.
| Discrete Factory Automation Market: This market includes a wide array of manufacturers who use machine vision for applications in a variety of industries, including the automotive, consumer electronics, food and beverage, healthcare pharmaceutical, and aerospace industries. These customers purchase Cognex machine vision systems either directly from the Company or through a reseller and install them on their production lines. | ||
| Surface Inspection Market: These customers are manufacturers of materials processed in a continuous fashion, such as paper and metals. These customers need sophisticated machine vision to detect and classify defects in the surfaces of those materials as they are being processed at high speeds. | ||
| Commercial Markets: The Companys commercial products currently serve the building automation and security market for vision-based people sensing and counting, as well as the automotive and truck market for vehicle-based driver-assist vision sensors that enhance vehicle safety and driver convenience. Although sales to commercial customers were not material in 2006 and are not expected to be material in 2007, the Company believes that entering these new commercial markets for machine vision systems is an important strategic move to diversify into areas beyond industrial manufacturing. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123R requires companies to recognize
compensation expense for all share-based payments to employees at fair value.
SFAS No. 123R was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method
in which compensation expense is recognized beginning on the effective date. Under this transition
method, compensation expense recognized after January 1, 2006 includes: (1) compensation expense
for all share-based payments granted prior to but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005, based on
the grant-date fair value estimated under SFAS No. 123, and (2) compensation expense for all
share-based payments granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated under SFAS No. 123R.
The fair values of stock options granted after January 1, 2006 were estimated on the grant date
using a binomial lattice model. The fair values of options granted prior to January 1, 2006 were
estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123.
The Company believes that a binomial lattice model results in a better estimate of fair value
because it identifies patterns of exercises based on triggering events, tying the results to
possible future events instead of a single path of actual historical events. Readers should refer
to Note 10: Stock-Based Compensation Expense to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
detailed description of the valuation assumptions.
The total stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2007 was $2,724,000 and $896,000, respectively, and
$3,475,000 and $1,222,000 for the same periods in 2006. The total stock-based compensation expense
and the related income tax benefit recognized for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007
was $8,245,000 and $2,702,000, respectively, and $9,936,000 and $3,491,000 for the same periods in
2006. No compensation expense was capitalized at September 30, 2007 or October 1, 2006.
Stock-based compensation expense decreased in 2007 from the prior year as a result of a declining
trend in the number of stock options granted, as well as lower grant-date fair values primarily due
to a lower stock price and assumed volatility.
17
Table of Contents
At September 30, 2007, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options
was $11,365,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
Results of Operations
Correction of Prior-Period Misstatements Related to Unsubstantiated Orders in Japan
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce revenue by $1,060,000
to correct an overstatement of revenue reported in the first quarter of 2007 amounting to $303,000
and in the fourth quarter of 2006 amounting to $757,000. Upon investigation, the Company concluded
that these previously-reported revenues were from unsubstantiated customer orders resulting in the
shipment of product and the recording of revenue with no evidence of an arrangement with the
customer. These revenue misstatements arose from improper orders for PC-based vision systems to
semiconductor and electronics capital equipment manufacturers in Japan. The Company has determined
that these amounts were not material to the results reported in the second quarter of 2007, the
first quarter of 2007, or the fourth quarter of 2006, and therefore, corrected these misstatements
in the second quarter of 2007.
Revenue
Revenue for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 decreased 6% to $54,745,000 from
$58,005,000 for the three-month period ended October 1, 2006, and revenue for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2007 decreased 11% to $160,416,000 from $180,119,000 for the nine-month period
ended October 1, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to lower sales of PC-based vision systems
to customers in the semiconductor and electronics industries. Sales of PC-based vision systems to
all customers were down 19% for the three-month period and 30% for the nine-month period.
Excluding the correction in the second quarter of 2007 of the prior-period revenue misstatements,
sales of PC-based vision systems were down 29% for the nine-month period. Lower surface inspection
revenue also contributed to the decrease in each period. Geographically, revenue decreased from
the prior year in the Americas, Japan, and Asia, but most significantly in Japan for the nine-month
period, where many of the Companys semiconductor and electronics capital equipment customers are
located.
Sales to customers who make capital equipment for the semiconductor and electronics industries,
which are included in the Companys MVSD segment, represented 27% of the Companys total revenue in
both the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, compared to 32% in the same
periods in 2006. Sales decreased $4,085,000, or 22%, and $14,803,000, or 26%, in the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, of which $757,000 in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007 was due to the correction in the second quarter of the prior-period
revenue misstatements. Revenue from this sector was relatively flat from the prior quarter after
adjusting for the prior-period revenue misstatements, and had been declining since the first
quarter of 2006 due to industry cyclicality. The Company does not expect a significant change in
this business through the first half of 2008.
Sales to manufacturing customers in the discrete factory automation area, which are included in the
Companys MVSD segment, represented 64% and 62% of the Companys total revenue in the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 56% in the same periods
in 2006. Sales increased $2,536,000, or 8%, and remained relatively flat in the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The Company offers a full range of
machine vision products to its factory automation customers at different capability/price points,
from its programmable PC-based vision systems to its low-cost, easy-to-use vision sensors. Sales
of the Companys In-Sight vision sensors, Industrial ID products, and Checker expert sensors all
increased from the prior year. This increase, however, was offset by lower sales of the Companys
PC-based vision systems to factory automation customers primarily in the electronics industry. The
Company is investing in new product offerings for the factory automation market with the goal of
growing this business.
Sales to surface inspection customers, which comprise the Companys SISD segment, represented 9%
and 11% of the Companys total revenue in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September
30, 2007, respectively, compared to 12% in the same periods in 2006. Sales decreased $1,626,000,
or
18
Table of Contents
24%, and $4,653,000, or 21%, in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007,
respectively. This decrease was primarily due to the deferral of product revenue for surface
inspection systems that have shipped to customers, but are part of multiple-element arrangements for which the
Company does not have vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value for all of the
undelivered elements. In these instances, the Company is required to defer the product revenue
related to the system that shipped until all of the elements in the arrangement have been delivered
to the customer or the Company has VSOE of fair value for the remaining obligations.
Product revenue decreased $3,053,000, or 6%, and $20,416,000, or 13%, in the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, of which $757,000 in the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007 was due to the correction in the second quarter of the prior-period
revenue misstatements. The remaining decrease was primarily due to a lower volume of PC-based
vision systems sold to semiconductor and electronics capital equipment manufacturers, as well as
discrete factory automation customers in the electronics industry. Sales of surface inspection
systems also declined from the prior year.
Service revenue, which is derived from the sale of maintenance and support, education, consulting,
and installation services, decreased $207,000, or 4%, and increased $713,000, or 4%, in the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The decrease in the
three-month period was due principally to the timing of surface inspection installations. The
increase in the nine-month period was primarily due to higher maintenance and support revenue.
Service revenue represented 10% and 11% of total revenue for the three-month and nine-month periods
in 2007, respectively, compared to 10% and 9% for the same periods in 2006.
Gross Margin
Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 73% and 71% for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 73% for the same periods in 2006. The gross
margin percentage for the three-month period remained consistent despite the lower sales volume due
to a higher percentage of total revenue from the sale of modular vision systems, which have higher
margins than the sale of surface inspection systems. During the nine-month period ended September
30, 2007, the Company recorded provisions for excess and obsolete MVSD inventory totaling
$2,714,000 resulting from lower actual demand than was previously estimated as part of the
Companys material requirements forecasts, together with lower estimates of future demand from both
semiconductor and electronics capital equipment and discrete factory automation customers. This
charge lowered the gross margin by one hundred basis points from 72% to 71% for the nine-month
period in 2007. The remaining decrease for the nine-month period was primarily due to the impact
of the lower sales volume. Although manufacturing overhead costs were lower in 2007 than the prior
year due to start-up costs incurred in the first half of 2006 when the Company shifted a portion of
its manufacturing operations from Massachusetts to Ireland, the impact of the lower revenue more
than offset these cost savings.
MVSD gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 77% and 74% for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 77% for the same periods in 2006. The
decrease in MVSD margin for the nine-month period was primarily due to higher excess and obsolete
inventory provisions recorded in 2007 and the impact of the lower sales volume. SISD gross margin
as a percentage of revenue was 42% and 40% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 48% and 47% for the same periods in 2006. The
decrease in SISD margin was due principally to the impact of the lower sales volume and higher
warranty provisions.
Product gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 77% and 75% for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 77% for the same periods in 2006. The
decrease in product margin for the nine-month period was primarily due to higher excess and
obsolete inventory provisions recorded in 2007 and the impact of the lower sales volume. Service
gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 40% and 38% for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to 41% and 37% for the same periods in 2006. The
decrease in the service margin for the three-month period was primarily due to the timing of
surface inspection installations. The increase in the service margin for the nine-month period was
due principally
19
Table of Contents
to higher maintenance and support revenue sold bundled with MVSD products, without
a corresponding increase in service costs.
Operating Expenses
Research, development, and engineering (R,D&E) expenses for the three-month period ended September
30, 2007 increased 9% to $8,704,000 from $7,997,000 for the three-month period ended October 1,
2006, and R,D&E expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 increased 1% to
$24,654,000 from $24,496,000 for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006. MVSD R,D&E expenses
increased $684,000, or 9%, and $190,000, or 1%, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007, respectively. The increase for the three-month period was due principally to
higher labor costs resulting from additional employees and contractors, as well as higher outside
services and patent-related costs, to support new product initiatives. Although these same costs
were also higher for the nine-month period, these increases were partially offset by lower company
bonus accruals and stock-based compensation expense. SISD R,D&E expenses were relatively
consistent in each period presented from the prior year.
R,D&E expenses as a percentage of revenue were 16% and 15% for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and 14% for the same periods in 2006. The Company
believes that a continued commitment to R,D&E activities is essential in order to maintain product
leadership with existing products and provide innovative new product offerings, and therefore,
expects to continue to make significant R,D&E investments in the future. Although the Company
targets its R,D&E spending to be between 10% and 15% of revenue, this percentage is impacted by
revenue cyclicality. At any point in time, the Company has numerous research and development
projects underway, and the Company believes that none of these projects is material on an
individual basis.
Selling, general, and administrative (S,G&A) expenses for the three-month period ended September
30, 2007 increased 4% to $24,303,000 from $23,414,000 for the three-month period ended October 1,
2006, and SG&A expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 increased 1% to
$72,870,000 from $72,470,000 for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006. MVSD S,G&A expenses
increased $722,000, or 4%, and $1,143,000, or 2%, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007, respectively. SISD S,G&A expenses were relatively consistent in each period
presented from the prior year. Corporate expenses that are not allocated to either division
increased $158,000, or 6%, and decreased $862,000, or 9%, for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
The increase in MVSD S,G&A expenses for the three-month period was primarily due to higher salary
expense resulting from additional sales headcount intended to grow factory automation revenues.
Although salary expense was also higher for the nine-month period,
this increase was partially
offset by lower company bonus accruals and stock-based compensation expense. Higher company
meeting costs also contributed to the increase for the nine-month period due to the timing of the
Companys annual sales kick-off meetings, which were held during the first quarter in 2007 compared
to the fourth quarter in 2006. In addition, a stronger Euro Dollar versus the U.S. Dollar in 2007
resulted in higher S,G&A costs when expenses of the Companys European operations were translated
into U.S. Dollars. The increase in corporate expenses for the three-month period was due
principally to higher professional fees, including fees related to the investigation of
unsubstantiated orders in Japan, while the decrease in the nine-month period was due primarily to
the costs associated with the Companys 25th Anniversary party held in January 2006, as
well as lower company bonus accruals, partially offset by higher professional fees.
Nonoperating Income
Investment and other income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 increased 24% to
$1,881,000 from $1,518,000 for the three-month period ended October 1, 2006, and investment and
other income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 increased 15% to $5,597,000 from
$4,856,000 for the nine-month period ended October 1, 2006. Although the average invested balance
declined in the past year due to cash outlays related primarily to the Companys stock repurchase
program, investment income increased over the prior year due to higher yields on the Companys
20
Table of Contents
portfolio of debt securities. Other income also increased over the prior year due to higher rental
income from leasing buildings adjacent to the Companys corporate headquarters.
During the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded
foreign currency gains of $353,000 and losses of $88,000, respectively, compared to losses of
$282,000 and $707,000 for the same periods in 2006. The gains during the three-month period ended
September 30, 2007 were primarily due to the revaluation and settlement of accounts receivable balances that
are reported in one currency and collected or paid in another. While the Company also experienced
similar gains during the nine-month period in 2007, they were offset by losses on the revaluation
and settlement of intercompany balances that are reported in one currency and collected or paid in
another. The losses during the three-month period ended October 1, 2006 were primarily due to the
revaluation and settlement of intercompany balances, whereas the losses during the nine-month
period were primarily due to the revaluation of cash balances on the Companys subsidiaries books
that are denominated in a currency other than the subsidiaries functional currency.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2007 was 21% and 26%, respectively, compared to 18% and 21% for the same periods in 2006. The
effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2007 included the impact of the following discrete tax
events: a reduction of tax expense of $444,000 from the final true-up of the prior years tax
accrual upon filing the actual tax returns and a $51,000 reduction of tax expense upon the
favorable settlement of an Internal Revenue Service audit relating to the DVT acquisition and
upon the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain state tax issues, partially offset by
a $74,000 increase to tax expense for certain state tax issues. The second quarter of 2007
included an increase to tax expense of $438,000 due to the final adjustment to the U.S. tax returns
related to the settlement in the third quarter of 2006 of the case brought by the Tokyo Regional
Taxation Bureau (TRTB) against the Companys US subsidiary for tax years 1997 through 2001. The
third quarter of 2006 included the settlement of the TRTB case brought against the Companys US
entity that required an increase to tax expense of $1,058,000, offset by a reduction of tax expense
due to expiration of the statute of limitations of $1,220,000 and the final true-up of the prior
years tax accrual of $405,000.
The discrete tax events in 2007 decreased the effective tax rate by five hundred basis points from
26% to 21% for the three-month period in 2007, and had no net impact on the effective tax rate for
the nine-month period in 2007. The discrete tax events in 2006 decreased the effective tax rate by
five hundred basis points from 23% to 18% for the three-month period in 2006, and four hundred
basis points from 25% to 21% for the nine-month period in 2006. The remaining change in the
effective tax rate from 23% to 26% for the three-month period and 25% to 26% for the nine-month
period was due to more of the Companys profits being earned in higher tax jurisdictions. The
adjustment to increase the year-to-date 2006 effective tax rate (excluding discrete tax events)
from 25% to 26% was recorded in the third quarter of 2006.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). FIN 48 supersedes SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, as it relates to income
tax liabilities and lowers the minimum threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements from probable to more likely than not (i.e., a
likelihood of occurrence greater than fifty percent). Under FIN 48, the recognition threshold is
met when an entity concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more
likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority.
Those tax positions failing to qualify for initial recognition are recognized in the first interim
period in which they meet the more likely than not standard, or are resolved through negotiation or
litigation with the taxing authority, or upon expiration of the statute of limitations.
Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized occurs when an entity subsequently
determines that a tax position no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being
sustained.
Differences between the amounts recognized in the financial statements prior to the adoption of FIN
48 and the amounts recognized after adoption are accounted for as a cumulative effect adjustment
recorded
21
Table of Contents
to the beginning balance of retained earnings. As required, the Company adopted FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007, and as a result, recognized a $4,021,000 increase in liabilities and a
corresponding reduction to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance for uncertain tax
positions that existed at December 31, 2006, but previously did not meet the requirements for
liability recognition under SFAS No. 5. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company
recognized a $1,089,000 increase in liabilities for uncertain tax positions as part of its income
tax accrual, of which $379,000 was recognized in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007.
Estimated interest and penalties included in these amounts
totaled $592,000 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, of which $180,000 was included
in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007.
Under FIN 48, only the portion of the liability that is expected to be paid within one year is
classified as a current liability. As a result, liabilities expected to be resolved without the
payment of cash (e.g., resolution due to the expiration of the statute of limitations) or are not
expected to be paid within one year are not classified as current. The Company reclassified
$8,367,000 of current liabilities for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2006 to
non-current liabilities to conform to the balance sheet presentation requirements of FIN 48. All
of the Companys liabilities for uncertain tax positions are classified as non-current liabilities
at September 30, 2007. These liabilities include $2,763,000 of estimated interest and penalties,
for which it is the Companys policy to record as income tax expense.
The tax years 1999 through 2006 remain open to examination by various taxing authorities in the
jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The Company is currently under audit in two
jurisdictions, the United States and Japan. The Internal Revenue Service is auditing tax years 2003 through 2006. The
Company believes that it will conclude this audit within the next twelve months and if the
Companys tax positions are sustained, this would result in a reduction in income tax expense. An
estimate of the range of possible changes to existing reserves cannot be made at this time. The
Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau is auditing tax years 2002 through 2005 and has recently issued a finding that a permanent
establishment exists with the Companys Irish subsidiary. The Company believes it has a
substantive defense against this finding and is preparing to request Competent Authority
intervention in accordance with the Japan/Ireland tax treaty. It is not expected that this audit
will be concluded within the next twelve months. To avoid further interest and penalties, the
Company has paid tax, interest, and penalties through the date of assessment of 766,257,300 Yen (or
approximately $6,631,000 based on the exchange rate as of September 30, 2007) to the Japanese tax
authorities. This amount is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The changes in the reserve for income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
$ | 8,367 | ||
Cumulative effect upon adoption of FIN 48 |
4,021 | |||
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
12,388 | |||
Provisions during the period |
1,089 | |||
Gross-up of FIN 48 liabilities |
4,436 | |||
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
$ | 17,913 | ||
During the third quarter of 2007, the Company reclassified $4,436,000 that was previously netted
against the reserve for income taxes to non-current deferred tax assets to present FIN 48
liabilities at a gross amount, as opposed to net of any correlative tax relief.
The Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $16,427,000 and $17,913,000 at January 1, 2007 and
September 30, 2007, respectively, of which $1,000,000 would reduce goodwill and the remainder would
reduce income tax expense, if recognized.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has historically been able to generate positive cash flow from operations, which has
funded its operating activities and other cash requirements and has resulted in an accumulated
cash, cash equivalent, and investment balance of $265,367,000 at September 30, 2007, representing
57% of
22
Table of Contents
shareholders equity. The Company has established guidelines relative to credit ratings,
diversification, and maturities of its investments that maintain liquidity.
The Companys cash requirements during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 were met with
its existing cash, cash equivalent, and investment balance, as well as positive cash flow from
operations. Cash requirements primarily consisted of operating activities, the repurchase of
common stock, and the payment of dividends. Capital expenditures during the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2007 totaled $3,307,000 and consisted primarily of expenditures for computer hardware
and software, as well as various building improvements to the Companys corporate headquarters.
In June 2000, Cognex Corporation became a Limited Partner in Venrock Associates III, L.P.
(Venrock), a venture capital fund. A Director of the Company is a Managing General Partner of
Venrock Associates. The Company has committed to a total investment in the limited partnership of
up to $20,500,000, with the commitment period expiring on December 31, 2010. The Company does not
have the right to withdraw from the partnership prior to December 31, 2010. As of September 30,
2007, the Company had contributed $19,488,000 to the partnership, including $1,025,000 during the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. The remaining commitment of $1,012,000 can be called
by Venrock in any period through 2010.
In July 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100,000,000 of
the Companys common stock. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had repurchased 2,449,333 shares
at a cost of $57,076,000 under this program. The Company did not repurchase any shares during the
three-month period ended September 30, 2007. The Company may repurchase additional shares under
this program in future periods depending upon a variety of factors, including the stock price
levels and share availability.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, the Companys Board of Directors has declared and paid a
cash dividend in each quarter, including a dividend of $0.085 per share in each quarter of 2007
that amounted to $11,215,000 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. Future dividends
will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon such factors as
the Board deems relevant.
In May 2006, the Company acquired AssistWare Technology, Inc. for $2,998,000 in cash paid at
closing, with the potential for an additional cash payment of up to $500,000 in the second quarter
of 2007, up to $500,000 in the fourth quarter of 2007, and up to $1,000,000 in the second quarter
of 2008 depending upon the achievement of certain performance criteria. The Company determined
that the contingent payment in the second quarter of 2007 had been earned and made a payment of
$502,000 that was allocated to goodwill. This payment included a $2,000 adjustment related to the
final closing balance sheet of AssistWare. The Company has also determined that the second
contingent payment totaling $500,000 has been earned and expects to make this payment during the
fourth quarter of 2007, with this amount allocated to goodwill. The Companys business strategy
includes selective expansion into new machine vision applications through the acquisition of
businesses and technologies, which may result in significant cash outlays in the future.
The Company believes that its existing cash, cash equivalent, and investment balance, together with
continued positive cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to meet its operating, investing,
and financing activities for the remainder of 2007 and the foreseeable future.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes to the Companys exposures to market risk since December 31,
2006.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has
evaluated, with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
such rules) as
23
Table of Contents
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that such disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of that date.
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. During the second
quarter of 2007, the Company issued new order acceptance and customer credit limit policies for
orders originating from the Companys Japanese subsidiary, Cognex K.K. The Company implemented these changes to its internal control
over financial reporting in response to the Companys identification of the unsubstantiated
customer orders that resulted in the prior-period misstatements described in this report. See
Part IItem 2Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsResults of OperationsCorrection of Prior-Period Misstatements for further information.
The Company continues to review its disclosure controls and procedures, including its internal
controls and procedures for financial reporting, and may make further changes aimed at enhancing
their effectiveness and to ensure that the Companys systems evolve with its business.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On April 16, 2007, VCode Holdings, Inc. et. al. filed a complaint against the Company in the Eastern District of the State of Texas asserting a claim of patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5.331.176. This matter is in its early stages and discovery has commenced. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this matter, and an adverse resolution of this lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, liquidity, results of operations, and/or indemnification obligations. | ||
In addition, refer to Item 3 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 for a summary of the Companys legal proceedings as of that date. With respect to the declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for Minnesota filed by the Company against Acacia Research Corporation et al. referenced in that report, discovery has concluded and the parties anticipate trial to occur sometime in the first quarter of 2008. | ||
The Company is subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Although management currently believes that resolving claims against the Company, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and managements view of these matters may change in the future. |
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
For factors that could affect the Companys business, results of operations, and financial condition, see the risk factors discussion provided in Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. |
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of its Common Stock during the periods indicated. |
24
Table of Contents
Total | Approximate | |||||||||||||||
Number of | Dollar Value | |||||||||||||||
Shares | of Shares | |||||||||||||||
Purchased | that May Yet | |||||||||||||||
as Part of | Be | |||||||||||||||
Total | Average | Publicly | Purchased | |||||||||||||
Number of | Price | Announced | Under the | |||||||||||||
Shares | Paid per | Plans or | Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Share | Programs | Programs | ||||||||||||
July 2 31, 2007 |
| | | $ | 42,924,000 | |||||||||||
August 1 31, 2007 |
| | | $ | 42,924,000 | |||||||||||
September 1 30,
2007 |
| | | $ | 42,924,000 | |||||||||||
Total |
| | | $ | 42,924,000 |
(1) | In July 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100,000,000 of the Companys Common Stock. The Company may repurchase additional shares under this program in future periods depending upon a variety of factors, including the market value of the Companys Common Stock and the average return on the Companys invested balances. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
10.1 Amendment to Cognex Corporation 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, effective
as of July 26, 2007*
10.2 Amendment to Cognex Corporation 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan, effective as of July 26, 2007*
10.3 Amendment to Cognex Corporation 2001 General Stock Option Plan,
effective as of July 26, 2007*
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
* | Filed herewith | |
** | Furnished herewith |
25
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: November 1, 2007 | COGNEX CORPORATION |
|||
/s/ Robert J. Shillman | ||||
Robert J. Shillman | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of
the Board of Directors (duly authorized officer, principal executive officer) |
||||
/s/ Richard A. Morin | ||||
Richard A. Morin | ||||
Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief
Financial Officer, and Treasurer (duly authorized officer, principal financial and accounting officer) |
||||
26