COGNEX CORP - Quarter Report: 2011 April (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2011 |
or
o | Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 001-34218
COGNEX CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts | 04-2713778 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One Vision Drive Natick, Massachusetts 01760-2059 (508) 650-3000 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including |
||
area code, of principal executive offices) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ
|
No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ
|
No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o
|
No þ |
As of April 3, 2011, there were 41,513,499 shares of Common Stock, $.002 par value, of the
registrant outstanding.
INDEX
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||
Product |
$ | 68,877 | $ | 54,613 | ||||
Service |
5,517 | 4,354 | ||||||
74,394 | 58,967 | |||||||
Cost of revenue |
||||||||
Product |
15,099 | 12,911 | ||||||
Service |
3,284 | 3,030 | ||||||
18,383 | 15,941 | |||||||
Gross margin |
||||||||
Product |
53,778 | 41,702 | ||||||
Service |
2,233 | 1,324 | ||||||
56,011 | 43,026 | |||||||
Research, development, and engineering expenses |
9,482 | 8,103 | ||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
29,161 | 23,622 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 49 | ||||||
Operating income |
17,368 | 11,252 | ||||||
Foreign currency loss |
(59 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||
Investment income |
605 | 257 | ||||||
Other expense |
(205 | ) | (246 | ) | ||||
Income before income tax expense |
17,709 | 11,098 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
4,073 | 2,553 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,636 | $ | 8,545 | ||||
Earnings per weighted-average common and common-equivalent share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Weighted-average common and common-equivalent shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
41,336 | 39,667 | ||||||
Diluted |
42,286 | 39,683 | ||||||
Cash dividends per common share |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
April 3, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 37,014 | $ | 33,203 | ||||
Short-term investments |
170,342 | 147,823 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, less reserves of
$1,244 and $1,235 in 2011 and 2010,
respectively |
42,124 | 45,901 | ||||||
Inventories |
27,262 | 22,717 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
6,312 | 6,302 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
20,569 | 23,059 | ||||||
Total current assets |
303,623 | 279,005 | ||||||
Long-term investments |
109,069 | 102,055 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
30,063 | 29,596 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
15,720 | 15,555 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
22,084 | 23,130 | ||||||
Goodwill |
82,524 | 82,204 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,567 | 1,559 | ||||||
$ | 564,650 | $ | 533,104 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 8,078 | $ | 7,153 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
23,938 | 29,346 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
10,107 | 7,771 | ||||||
Deferred revenue and customer deposits |
11,573 | 10,162 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
53,696 | 54,432 | ||||||
Reserve for income taxes |
5,528 | 5,361 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.002 par value
Authorized: 140,000 shares, issued: 41,513 and
41,065 shares in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
83 | 82 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
115,368 | 102,620 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
390,146 | 379,826 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
(171 | ) | (9,217 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
505,426 | 473,311 | ||||||
$ | 564,650 | $ | 533,104 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Accumulated Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | Total Shareholders' | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Par Value | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Income | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
41,065 | $ | 82 | $ | 102,620 | $ | 379,826 | $ | (9,217 | ) | $ | 473,311 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under
stock option plans |
448 | 1 | 9,516 | | | 9,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| | 2,352 | | | 2,352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock
option exercises |
| | 880 | | | 880 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends |
| | | (3,316 | ) | | (3,316 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 13,636 | | $ | 13,636 | 13,636 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on
available-for-sale investments,
net of tax of $53 |
| | | | (558 | ) | (558 | ) | (558 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax of $327 |
| | | | 9,604 | 9,604 | 9,604 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 22,682 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of April 3, 2011 (unaudited) |
41,513 | $ | 83 | $ | 115,368 | $ | 390,146 | $ | (171 | ) | $ | 505,426 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,636 | $ | 8,545 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Stock-based compensation expenses |
2,352 | (33 | ) | |||||
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment |
1,296 | 1,145 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
1,079 | 1,235 | ||||||
Amortization of premiums/discounts on investments |
1,462 | 420 | ||||||
Tax effect of stock option exercises |
(880 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||
Change in deferred income taxes |
(472 | ) | (312 | ) | ||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
2,310 | (1,252 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
20,783 | 9,711 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of investments |
(64,270 | ) | (16,694 | ) | ||||
Maturities and sales of investments |
40,096 | 9,890 | ||||||
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment |
(1,577 | ) | (1,081 | ) | ||||
Cash received related to disposition |
| 315 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(25,751 | ) | (7,570 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans |
9,517 | 120 | ||||||
Stock option buyback |
| (83 | ) | |||||
Payment of dividends |
(3,316 | ) | (1,983 | ) | ||||
Tax effect of stock option exercises |
880 | 37 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
7,081 | (1,909 | ) | |||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
1,698 | (5,399 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
3,811 | (5,167 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
33,203 | 119,831 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 37,014 | $ | 114,664 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q, these notes are condensed and do not contain all disclosures required by generally
accepted accounting principles. Reference should be made to the consolidated financial statements
and related notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010.
In the opinion of the management of Cognex Corporation (the Company), the accompanying
consolidated unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal,
recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position as of April 3,
2011, and the results of its operations for the quarters ended April 3, 2011 and April 4, 2010, and
changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the periods presented.
The results disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarter ended April 3,
2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
NOTE 2: Fair Value Measurements
Financial Assets that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table summarizes the financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as
of April 3, 2011 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||
Active Markets for | Significant Other | |||||||
Identical Assets | Observable | |||||||
(Level 1) | Inputs (Level 2) | |||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Money market instruments |
$ | 7,325 | $ | | ||||
Treasury bills |
| 10,385 | ||||||
Municipal bonds |
| 111,143 | ||||||
Corporate bonds |
| 80,580 | ||||||
Agency bonds |
| 40,568 | ||||||
Sovereign bonds |
| 24,232 | ||||||
Covered bonds |
| 6,570 | ||||||
Currency forward contracts |
212 | |
The majority of the Companys investments are reported at fair value based upon model-driven
valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset, and are therefore classified
as Level 2 investments. These investments are priced daily by a large, third-party pricing
service. The service maintains regular contact with market makers, brokers, dealers, and analysts
to gather information on market movement, direction, trends, and other specific data. They use
this information to structure yield curves for various types of debt securities and arrive at the
current days valuations. The Companys money market instruments are reported at fair value based
upon the daily market price for identical assets in active markets, and are therefore classified as
Level 1. The Company did not record an other-than-temporary impairment of investments in the
quarter ended April 3, 2011.
The Companys forward contracts are reported at fair value based upon quoted U.S. Dollar foreign
currency exchange rates, and are therefore classified as Level 1.
Financial Assets that are Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
The Company has an interest in a limited partnership, which is accounted for using the cost method
and is measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The fair value of the Companys limited
partnership interest is based upon valuations of the partnerships investments as determined by the
General Partner. Publicly-traded investments in active markets are reported at the market closing
price less a discount, as appropriate, to reflect restricted marketability. Fair value for private
investments for which observable
5
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
market prices in active markets do not exist is based upon the best information available including
the value of a recent financing, reference to observable valuation measures for comparable
companies (such as revenue multiples), public or private transactions (such as the sale of a
comparable company), and valuations for publicly-traded comparable companies. The amount
determined to be fair value also incorporates the General Partners own judgment and close
familiarity with the business activities of each portfolio company. Management monitors the
carrying value of this investment compared to its fair value to determine if an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. If a decline in fair value is considered to be
other-than-temporary, an impairment charge would be recorded to reduce the carrying value of the
asset to its fair value. The portfolio consists of securities of public and private companies, and
consequently, inputs used in the fair value calculation are classified as Level 3. The Company did
not record an other-than-temporary impairment of this asset in the quarter ended April 3, 2011.
Non-financial Assets that are Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
Non-financial assets such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment are
measured at fair value only when an impairment loss is recognized. The Company did not record an
impairment charge related to these assets in the quarter ended April 3, 2011.
NOTE 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments
Cash, cash equivalents, and investments consisted of the following (in thousands):
April 3, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash |
$ | 29,689 | $ | 26,650 | ||||
Money market instruments |
7,325 | 6,553 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
37,014 | 33,203 | ||||||
Treasury bills |
10,385 | 2,494 | ||||||
Municipal bonds |
75,928 | 75,457 | ||||||
Corporate bonds |
48,706 | 34,543 | ||||||
Agency bonds |
21,232 | 15,979 | ||||||
Sovereign bonds |
14,091 | 19,350 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
170,342 | 147,823 | ||||||
Municipal bonds |
35,215 | 34,794 | ||||||
Corporate bonds |
31,874 | 36,762 | ||||||
Agency bonds |
19,336 | 21,025 | ||||||
Sovereign bonds |
10,141 | | ||||||
Covered bonds |
6,570 | 3,541 | ||||||
Limited partnership interest (accounted for using cost method) |
5,933 | 5,933 | ||||||
Long-term investments |
109,069 | 102,055 | ||||||
$ | 316,425 | $ | 283,081 | |||||
The Companys portfolio consists of treasury bills, municipal bonds, corporate bonds, agency bonds,
sovereign bonds, and covered bonds. Treasury bills consist of debt securities issued by the U.S.
government; municipal bonds consist of debt securities issued by state and local government
entities; corporate bonds consist of debt securities issued by both international and domestic
companies; agency bonds consist of domestic or foreign obligations of government agencies and
government sponsored enterprises that have government backing; sovereign bonds consist of direct
debt issued by international governments (Germany and the Netherlands as of April 3, 2011); and
covered bonds consist of debt securities backed by governments, mortgages, or public sector loans.
The following table summarizes the Companys available-for-sale investments as of April 3, 2011 (in
thousands):
6
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Gross Unrealized | Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Short-term: |
||||||||||||||||
Treasury bills |
$ | 10,380 | $ | 5 | $ | | $ | 10,385 | ||||||||
Municipal bonds |
75,888 | 46 | (6 | ) | 75,928 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
48,793 | 9 | (96 | ) | 48,706 | |||||||||||
Agency bonds |
21,267 | 10 | (45 | ) | 21,232 | |||||||||||
Sovereign bonds |
14,105 | | (14 | ) | 14,091 | |||||||||||
Long-term: |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
35,192 | 65 | (42 | ) | 35,215 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
32,467 | | (593 | ) | 31,874 | |||||||||||
Agency bonds |
19,515 | 28 | (207 | ) | 19,336 | |||||||||||
Sovereign bonds |
10,207 | | (66 | ) | 10,141 | |||||||||||
Covered bonds |
6,649 | | (79 | ) | 6,570 | |||||||||||
$ | 274,463 | $ | 163 | $ | (1,148 | ) | $ | 273,478 | ||||||||
The following table summarizes the Companys gross unrealized losses and fair value for
available-for-sale investments in an unrealized loss position as of April 3, 2011 (in thousands):
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||
Municipal bonds |
$ | 29,034 | $ | (48 | ) | |||
Corporate bonds |
74,716 | (689 | ) | |||||
Agency bonds |
28,769 | (252 | ) | |||||
Sovereign bonds |
24,232 | (80 | ) | |||||
Covered bonds |
6,570 | (79 | ) | |||||
$ | 163,321 | $ | (1,148 | ) | ||||
As of April 3, 2011, the Company did not recognize an other-than-temporary impairment as these
investments have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and the
Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments to maturity or until the investments
amortized cost basis has been recovered. The Company recorded gross realized gains and gross
realized losses on the sale of debt securities totaling $9,000 and $14,000, respectively, in the
first quarter of 2011.
The following table presents the effective maturity dates of the Companys available-for-sale
investments as of April 3, 2011 (in thousands):
<1 Year | 1-2 Years | 2-3 Years | 3-4 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Treasury bills |
$ | 10,385 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 10,385 | ||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
75,928 | 27,362 | 6,855 | 998 | 111,143 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
48,706 | 15,362 | 16,512 | | 80,580 | |||||||||||||||
Agency bonds |
21,232 | 12,060 | 7,276 | | 40,568 | |||||||||||||||
Sovereign bonds |
14,091 | 4,401 | 1,482 | 4,258 | 24,232 | |||||||||||||||
Covered bonds |
| 4,723 | 1,847 | | 6,570 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 170,342 | $ | 63,908 | $ | 33,972 | $ | 5,256 | $ | 273,478 | |||||||||||
In June 2000, the Company became a Limited Partner in Venrock Associates III, L.P. (Venrock), a
venture capital fund. A Director of the Company was a General Partner of Venrock Associates
through December 31, 2009. The Company has committed to a total investment in the limited
partnership of up to $20,500,000, with an expiration date of December 31, 2013. As of April 3,
2011, the Company contributed $19,886,000 to the partnership. The remaining commitment of $614,000
can be called by Venrock at any time before December 31, 2013. Distributions are received and
contributions are requested at the discretion of Venrocks management.
7
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4: Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
April 3, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 17,563 | $ | 14,791 | ||||
Work-in-process |
2,752 | 2,051 | ||||||
Finished goods |
6,947 | 5,875 | ||||||
$ | 27,262 | $ | 22,717 | |||||
NOTE 5: Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The change in the carrying value of goodwill during the period ($320,000) is wholly attributable to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, as a portion of this asset is recorded on the
books of the Companys Irish subsidiary.
The Company evaluates the possible impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets whenever
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable.
No triggering event occurred in the quarter ended April 3, 2011 that would indicate a potential
impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets. However, the Company continues to monitor
market conditions, and changes in market conditions could result in an impairment of goodwill or
other intangible assets in a future period.
NOTE 6: Warranty Obligations
The Company warrants its hardware products to be free from defects in material and workmanship for
periods primarily ranging from six months to two years from the time of sale based upon the product
being purchased and the terms of the customer arrangement. Warranty obligations are evaluated and
recorded at the time of sale since it is probable that customers will make claims under warranties
related to products that have been sold and the amount of these claims can be reasonably estimated
based upon historical costs to fulfill claims. Obligations may also be recorded subsequent to the
time of sale whenever specific events or circumstances impacting product quality become known that
would not have been taken into account using historical data. Warranty obligations are included in
Accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The changes in the warranty obligation were as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,985 | ||
Provisions for warranties issued during the period |
475 | |||
Fulfillment of warranty obligations |
(385 | ) | ||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
96 | |||
Balance as of April 3, 2011 |
$ | 2,171 | ||
NOTE 7: Contingencies
In May 2008, the Company filed a complaint against MvTec Software GmbH, MvTec LLC, and Fuji America
Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging
infringement of certain patents owned by the Company. In April 2009 and again in June 2009,
Defendant MvTec Software GmbH filed re-examination requests of the patents-at-issue with the United
States Patent and Trademark Office. This matter is ongoing.
8
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
In May 2009, the Company pre-filed a complaint with the United States International Trade
Commission (ITC) pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §1337,
against MvTec Software GmbH, MvTec LLC, Fuji America, and several other respondents alleging unfair
methods of competition and unfair acts in the unlawful importation into the United States, sale for
importation, or sale within the United States after importation. By this filing, the Company
requested the ITC to investigate the Companys contention that certain machine vision software,
machine vision systems, and products containing the same infringe, and respondents directly
infringe and/or actively induce and/or contribute to the infringement in the United States, of one
or more of the Companys U.S. patents. In July 2009, the ITC issued an order that it would
institute an investigation based upon the Companys assertions. In September 2009, the Company
reached a settlement with two of the respondents, and in December 2009, the Company reached a
settlement with five additional respondents. In March 2010, the Company reached a settlement with
respondent Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and its subsidiary Fuji America Corporation. These
settlements did not have a material impact on the Companys financial results. An ITC hearing was
held in May 2010. In July 2010, the Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination
finding two of the Companys patents invalid and that respondents did not infringe the
patents-at-issue. In September 2010, the Commission issued a notice that it would review the
initial determination of the Administrative Law Judge. The ITC issued its Final Determination in
November 2010 in which it determined to modify-in-part and affirm-in-part the Administrative Law
Judges determination, and terminate the investigation with a finding of no violation of Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as amended 19 U.S.C. §1337). The Company has filed an appeal of the
decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
The Company cannot predict the outcome of the above-referenced pending matters and an adverse
resolution of these lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
position, liquidity, results of operations, and/or indemnification obligations. In addition,
various other claims and legal proceedings generally incidental to the normal course of business
are pending or threatened on behalf of or against the Company. While we cannot predict the outcome
of these incidental matters, we believe that any liability arising from them will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.
NOTE 8: Indemnification Provisions
Except as limited by Massachusetts law, the by-laws of the Company require it to indemnify certain
current or former directors, officers, and employees of the Company against expenses incurred by
them in connection with each proceeding in which he or she is involved as a result of serving or
having served in certain capacities. Indemnification is not available with respect to a proceeding
as to which it has been adjudicated that the person did not act in good faith in the reasonable
belief that the action was in the best interests of the Company. The maximum potential amount of
future payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions is unlimited. The
Company has never incurred significant costs related to these indemnification provisions. As a
result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may accept standard limited indemnification
provisions in connection with the sale of its products, whereby it indemnifies its customers for
certain direct damages incurred in connection with third-party patent or other intellectual
property infringement claims with respect to the use of the Companys products. The term of these
indemnification provisions generally coincides with the customers use of the Companys products.
The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these
provisions is generally subject to fixed monetary limits. The Company has never incurred
significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions.
As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company also accepts limited indemnification provisions
from time to time, whereby it indemnifies customers for certain direct damages incurred in
connection with bodily injury and property damage arising from the installation of the Companys
products. The term of these indemnification provisions generally coincides with the period of
installation. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to
make under these provisions is generally limited and is likely recoverable under the Companys
insurance policies. As a result of this coverage,
9
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
and the fact that the Company has never incurred
significant costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related
to these indemnification provisions, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these
provisions is minimal.
NOTE 9: Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations including
foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. The Company does not currently manage
its interest rate risk with derivative instruments; however, foreign currency exchange rate risk is
currently mitigated with derivative instruments. The Company uses derivative instruments to provide
an economic hedge against its transactional currency/functional currency exchange rate exposures.
Forward contracts on currencies are entered into to manage the transactional currency/functional
currency exposure of the Companys Irish subsidiarys accounts receivable denominated in U.S.
dollars and intercompany receivables denominated in Japanese Yen. These forward contracts are used
to minimize foreign currency gains or losses, as the gains or losses on these contracts are
intended to offset the losses or gains on the underlying exposures.
These forward contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting. Both the underlying exposures and the
forward contracts are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and changes in fair
value are reported as Foreign currency loss on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company recorded net foreign currency losses of $59,000 and $165,000 as of April 3, 2011
and April 4, 2010, respectively.
As of April 3, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding forward contracts that were
entered into to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate risk:
Currency | Amount | ||
Japanese Yen/Euro
|
225,000,000 Japanese Yen | ||
U.S. Dollar/Euro
|
12,150,000 U.S. Dollars |
Information regarding the fair value of the forward contracts outstanding as of April 3, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | April 3, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | Location | April 3, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Currency forward contracts |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 212 | $ | 83 | Accrued expenses | $ | | $ | 125 | ||||||||||||||||
Information regarding the effect of the forward contracts, net of the underlying exposure, on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarter ended April 3, 2011 and April 4, 2010
were as follows (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | Amount of Gain Recognized in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
of Gain Recognized | Income on Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Income on | Quarter ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | April 3, 2011 | April 4, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency forward contracts |
Foreign currency gain | $ | 2 | $ | 67 |
10
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 10: Stock-Based Compensation
The Companys share-based payments that result in compensation expense consist solely of stock
option grants. As of April 3, 2011, the Company had 7,102,350 shares available for grant under two
stock option plans: the 2001 General Stock Option Plan (5,609,990) and the 2007 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan (1,492,360). Each of these plans expires ten years from the date the plan was
approved. The 2001 General Stock Option Plan will expire in December of 2011. Generally, stock
options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Companys common stock
at the grant date, vest over four years based upon continuous service, and expire ten years from
the grant date.
The following table summarizes the Companys stock option activity for the quarter ended April 3,
2011:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Exercise | Term (in | Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Price | years) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2010 |
4,318 | $ | 20.05 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
857 | 29.98 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(449 | ) | 21.20 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(3 | ) | 19.33 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding as of April 3, 2011 |
4,723 | $ | 21.74 | 7.2 | $ | 33,201 | ||||||||||
Exercisable as of April 3, 2011 |
1,974 | $ | 20.60 | 4.9 | $ | 15,489 | ||||||||||
The fair values of stock options granted in each quarter presented were estimated using the
following weighted-average assumptions:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Risk-free rate |
3.6 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
1.0 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
42 | % | 43 | % | ||||
Expected term (in years) |
5.4 | 5.3 |
Risk-free rate
The risk-free rate was based upon a treasury instrument whose term was consistent with the
contractual term of the option.
Expected dividend yield
The current dividend yield was calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the
Companys Board of Directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by the closing stock
price on the grant date. The current dividend yield was then adjusted to reflect the Companys
expectations relative to future dividend declarations.
Expected volatility
The expected volatility was based upon a combination of historical volatility of the Companys
common stock over the contractual term of the option and implied volatility for traded options of
the Companys stock.
Expected term
The expected term was derived from the binomial lattice model from the impact of events that
trigger exercises over time.
The weighted-average grant-date fair values of stock options granted during the quarter ended April
3, 2011 and April 4, 2010 were $11.75 and $7.67, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The Company stratifies its employee population into two groups: one consisting of senior management
and another consisting of all other employees. The Company currently expects that approximately
66% of
its stock options granted to senior management and 68% of its options granted to all other
employees will actually vest. Therefore, the Company currently applies an estimated forfeiture
rate of 13% to all unvested options for senior management and a rate of 14% for all other
employees. The Company revised its estimated forfeiture rates in the first quarter of 2011, and
the cumulative effect of this change resulted in a reduction in compensation expense of
approximately $80,000.
The total stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit recognized for the
quarter ended April 3, 2011 were $2,352,000 and $791,000, respectively. For the quarter ended
April 4, 2010, the Company recorded a net benefit from stock options of $33,000 and related tax
expense of $20,000. No compensation expense was capitalized as of April 3, 2011 or December 31,
2010.
The following table details the stock-based compensation expense by caption for each quarter
presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Product cost of revenue |
$ | 165 | $ | 58 | ||||
Service cost of revenue |
70 | 1 | ||||||
Research, development, and engineering |
809 | 251 | ||||||
Selling, general, and administrative |
1,308 | (343 | ) | |||||
$ | 2,352 | $ | (33 | ) | ||||
The total intrinsic values of stock options exercised for the quarter ended April 3, 2011 and
April 4, 2010 were $4,668,000 and $13,000, respectively. The total fair values of stock options
vested for the quarter ended April 3, 2011 and April 4, 2010 were $7,002,000 and $7,937,000,
respectively.
As of April 3, 2011, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options
was $11,191,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.
NOTE 11: Stock Repurchase Program
In April 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50,000,000 of
the Companys common stock. As of April 3, 2011, the Company had repurchased a total of 1,038,797
shares at a cost of $20,000,000 under this program. The Company did not purchase any shares under
this program during the quarter ended April 3, 2011. The Company may repurchase shares under this
program in future periods depending upon a variety of factors, including, among other things, stock
price levels, share availability, and cash reserve requirements.
NOTE 12: Taxes
A reconciliation of the United States federal statutory corporate tax rate to the Companys
effective tax rate was as follows:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Income tax at federal statutory rate |
35 | % | 35 | % | ||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Foreign tax rate differential |
(13 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
Income tax provision |
23 | % | 23 | % | ||||
The Companys effective tax rate was 23% in both the first quarter of 2011 and 2010. There
were no discrete tax events in the quarters ended April 3, 2011 or April 4, 2010.
12
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
During the quarter ended April 3, 2011, the Company recorded a $149,000 increase in liabilities,
net of deferred tax benefit, for uncertain tax positions that were recorded as income tax expense.
Estimated interest and penalties included in these amounts totaled $20,000.
The Companys reserve for income taxes, including gross interest and penalties of $1,209,000, was
$5,528,000 as of April 3, 2011. All of the Companys liabilities for uncertain tax positions are
classified as non-current as of April 3, 2011. If the Companys tax positions were sustained or
the statutes of limitations related to certain positions expired, these reserves would be released
and income tax expense would be reduced in a future period. As a result of the expiration of
certain statutes of limitation, there is a potential that $490,000 of these reserves could be
released within the next twelve months, which would decrease income tax expense.
The Company has defined its major tax jurisdictions as the United States, Ireland, China, and
Japan, and within the United States, Massachusetts and California. The tax years 2007 through 2010
remain open to examination by various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company
operates.
The Company is currently negotiating an Advanced Pricing Agreement (APA) with Japan that will cover
tax years 2006 through 2012. The Company believes it is adequately reserved for these open years.
No formal agreement has been reached between the Tax Authorities in Ireland and Japan as of the
date of this filing.
NOTE 13: Weighted-Average Shares
Weighted-average shares were calculated as follows (in thousands):
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
41,336 | 39,667 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
950 | 16 | ||||||
Weighted-average common and common-equivalent shares outstanding |
42,286 | 39,683 | ||||||
Stock options to purchase 539,569 and 4,498,540 shares of common stock, on a weighted-average
basis, were outstanding for the quarters ended April 3, 2011 and April 4, 2010, respectively, but
were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share because they were
anti-dilutive.
NOTE 14: Segment Information
The Company has two reportable segments: the Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) and the Surface
Inspection Systems Division (SISD). MVSD develops, manufactures, and markets modular vision
systems that are used to control the manufacture of discrete items by locating, identifying,
inspecting, and measuring them during the manufacturing process. SISD develops, manufactures, and
markets surface inspection vision systems that are used to inspect surfaces of materials processed
in a continuous fashion, such as metals, papers, non-wovens, plastics, and glass, to ensure there
are no flaws or defects on the surfaces. Segments are determined based upon the way that
management organizes its business for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The
Company evaluates segment performance based upon income or loss from operations, excluding
stock-based compensation expense.
13
Table of Contents
COGNEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table summarizes information about the segments (in thousands):
MVSD | SISD | Reconciling Items |
Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Quarter Ended April 3, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 62,817 | $ | 6,060 | $ | | $ | 68,877 | ||||||||
Service revenue |
1,969 | 3,548 | | 5,517 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
22,027 | 997 | (5,656 | ) | 17,368 | |||||||||||
Quarter Ended April 4, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 49,660 | $ | 4,953 | $ | | $ | 54,613 | ||||||||
Service revenue |
1,497 | 2,857 | | 4,354 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
15,445 | (328 | ) | (3,865 | ) | 11,252 |
Reconciling items consist of stock-based compensation expense and unallocated corporate expenses,
which primarily include corporate headquarters costs, professional fees, and patent infringement
litigation. Additional asset information by segment is not produced internally for use by the
chief operating decision maker, and therefore, is not presented. Additional asset information is
not provided because cash and investments are commingled and the divisions share assets and
resources in a number of locations around the world.
NOTE 15: Dividends
On February 10, 2011, the Company announced that the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of
$0.08 per share. The dividend was paid on March 18, 2011 to all shareholders of record at the
close of business on March 4, 2011.
On May 2, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.09 per share. The
dividend is payable on June 17, 2011 to all shareholders of record at the close of business on June
3, 2011.
14
Table of Contents
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this report, as well as oral statements made by the Company from time
to time, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Readers can identify these forward-looking statements by our use of the words expects,
anticipates, estimates, believes, projects, intends, plans, will, may, shall,
could, should, and similar words and other statements of a similar sense. These statements
are based upon our current estimates and expectations as to prospective events and circumstances,
which may or may not be in our control and as to which there can be no firm assurances given.
These forward-looking statements, which include statements regarding business and market trends,
future financial performance, customer order rates, and growth and strategic plans, involve known
and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those projected. Such risks and uncertainties include: (1) current and future conditions in the
global economy; (2) the cyclicality of the semiconductor and electronics industries; (3) the
inability to penetrate new markets; (4) the inability to achieve significant international
revenue; (5) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; (6) the loss of a large customer;
(7) the inability to attract and retain skilled employees; (8) the reliance upon key suppliers to
manufacture and deliver critical components for our products; (9) the failure to effectively
manage product transitions or accurately forecast customer demand; (10) the inability to design
and manufacture high-quality products; (11) the technological obsolescence of current products and
the inability to develop new products; (12) the failure to properly manage the distribution of
products and services; (13) the inability to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual
property; (14) our involvement in time-consuming and costly litigation; (15) the impact of
competitive pressures; (16) the challenges in integrating and achieving expected results from
acquired businesses; (17) potential impairment charges with respect to our investments or for
acquired intangible assets or goodwill; and (18) exposure to additional tax liabilities. The
foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive and we encourage readers to refer to the
detailed discussion of risk factors included in Part I Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The Company cautions readers not to place
undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
The Company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise forward-looking statements to reflect
the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date such
statements are made.
Executive Overview
Cognex Corporation is a leading worldwide provider of machine vision products that capture and
analyze visual information in order to automate tasks, primarily in manufacturing processes, where
vision is required. Our Modular Vision Systems Division (MVSD) specializes in machine vision
systems that are used to automate the manufacture of discrete items, while our Surface Inspection
Systems Division (SISD) specializes in machine vision systems that are used to inspect the
surfaces of materials processed in a continuous fashion.
In addition to product revenue derived from the sale of machine vision systems, the Company also
generates revenue by providing maintenance and support, training, consulting, and installation
services to its customers. Our customers can be classified into three primary markets: factory
automation, semiconductor and electronics capital equipment, and surface inspection.
| Factory automation customers purchase Cognex vision products and incorporate them into their manufacturing processes. Virtually every manufacturer can achieve better quality and manufacturing efficiency by using machine vision, and therefore, this segment includes a broad base of customers across a variety of industries, including automotive, consumer electronics, food and beverage, health and beauty, medical devices, packaging, pharmaceutical, and solar. The factory automation market also includes customers who purchase Cognex vision products for use outside of the assembly process, such as using ID products in logistics automation for package sorting and distribution. Sales to factory automation customers represented approximately 70% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2011. |
15
Table of Contents
| Semiconductor and electronics capital equipment manufacturers purchase Cognex vision products and integrate them into the automation equipment that they manufacture and then sell to their customers to either make semiconductor chips or assemble printed circuit boards. Demand from these capital equipment manufacturers has historically been highly cyclical, with periods of investment followed by downturn. Sales to semiconductor and electronics capital equipment manufacturers represented approximately 17% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2011. | ||
| Surface inspection customers are manufacturers of materials processed in a continuous fashion, such as metals, paper, non-wovens, plastics, and glass. These customers need sophisticated machine vision to detect, classify, and analyze defects on the surfaces of those materials as they are being processed at high speeds. Surface inspection sales represented approximately 13% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2011. |
Revenue for the first quarter of 2011 totaled $74,394,000, representing an increase of $15,427,000
from the same period in the prior year. The higher revenue contributed to a gross margin of 75%
of revenue in the first quarter of 2011, compared to 73% of revenue in the same period in 2010.
Operating expenses increased by $5,539,000 over the prior years first quarter due primarily to
expenses associated with increased headcount in strategic areas and higher stock-based
compensation expense. As a result, the Company was able to generate an operating profit of
$17,368,000, or 23% of revenue, in the first quarter of 2011, compared to an operating profit of
$11,252,000, or 19% of revenue, in the first quarter of 2010.
Results of Operations
Revenue
Revenue for the first quarter of 2011 increased by $15,427,000, or 26%, from the first quarter of
2010 due to higher sales in all three of the Companys primary markets.
Factory Automation Market
Sales to manufacturing customers in the factory automation area, which are included in the
Companys MVSD segment, represented 70% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2011 compared to
71% in the first quarter of 2010. Sales to these customers increased by $10,383,000, or 25%, from
the first quarter of 2010. The largest dollar increases were experienced in the Americas and
Europe, where the Company has a broad base of factory automation customers, while the largest
percentage increase was experienced in Southeast Asia, where the Company has expanded its sales
and support infrastructure, particularly in China, in order to access more of the machine vision
market in this high-potential growth region. Although factory automation revenue in Japan was
lower in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the prior year, the decline was largely attributed
to shipments that were pushed from March to April at customers requests after the March
11th earthquake that hit this region. Although the increase in factory automation
revenue was noted across all major product lines, the largest percentage increase came from the ID
Products business, where the Company has made significant product investments for the
manufacturing sector that we currently serve, as well as for the logistics market that we hope to
penetrate with DataMan® 500 that was introduced early in the first quarter of
2011.
Sales to factory automation customers decreased by $8,495,000, or 14%, from the fourth quarter of
2010. Revenue in the fourth quarter of 2010 included $6,500,000 related to an arrangement with a
single customer for which the work was performed over the prior four years, but revenue was
deferred until the final obligation was completed in the fourth quarter of 2010. Excluding the
recognition of this revenue in the fourth quarter of 2010, sales to these customers decreased by
$1,995,000, or 4%, from the prior quarter. A small decrease in revenue from the fourth quarter to
the first quarter is not unusual for the factory automation business, as many customers consume
their remaining annual capital budgets during the last quarter of the year. Management expects
total factory automation revenue to grow in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the first
quarter, despite uncertainty surrounding the market in Japan, as the aftermath of the March
earthquake continues to unfold.
Semiconductor and Electronics Capital Equipment Market
Sales to customers who make automation equipment for the semiconductor and electronics industries,
which are included in the Companys MVSD segment, represented 17% of total revenue in the first
quarter
16
Table of Contents
of 2011 compared to 16% in the first quarter of 2010. Sales to these customers increased by
$3,246,000, or 35%, from the first quarter of 2010. Geographically, revenue increased most
significantly in Japan and Southeast Asia, where many of the Companys semiconductor and
electronics capital equipment customers are located. Although sales to these customers increased
by $1,094,000, or 10%, from the fourth quarter of 2010, the semiconductor and electronics capital
equipment market has historically been highly cyclical and management has limited visibility
regarding future order levels from these customers.
Surface Inspection Market
Sales to surface inspection customers, which comprise the Companys SISD segment, represented 13%
of total revenue in both the first quarter of 2011 and 2010. Revenue from these customers
increased by $1,798,000, or 23%, from the first quarter of 2010 due to both higher product and
service revenue. Sales to the metal and non-woven industries were significantly higher than in
the first quarter of 2010. Revenue decreased by $3,125,000, or 25%, from the fourth quarter of
2010, which was a record revenue quarter for the division. The revenue reported each quarter can
vary depending upon the timing of customer orders, system deliveries, and installations, as well
as the impact of revenue deferrals.
Product Revenue
Product revenue increased by $14,264,000, or 26%, from the first quarter of 2010 due to a higher
volume of vision systems sold, primarly to customers in factory automation and the semiconductor
and electronics capital equipment markets. The impact of the higher volume was partially offset
by lower average selling prices, as the Company introduced new products at lower price points.
Service Revenue
Service revenue, which is derived from the sale of maintenance and support, education, consulting,
and installation services increased by $1,163,000, or 27%, from the first quarter of 2010
primarily due to higher revenue from SISD installation services and maintenance support contracts,
as well as higher revenue from MVSD consulting services. Service revenue was consistent as a
percentage of total revenue at 7% in both the first quarter of 2011 and 2010.
Gross Margin
Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 75% for the first quarter of 2011 compared to 73% for
the first quarter of 2010. This increase was primarily due to higher MVSD product margins.
MVSD Margin
MVSD gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 80% for the first quarter of 2011 compared to 78%
for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in MVSD margin was primarily due to manufacturing
efficiences achieved from higher revenue levels, as certain fixed manufacturing costs were spread
over a higher revenue base.
SISD Margin
SISD gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 46% for the first quarter of 2011 compared to 40%
for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in SISD margin was primarily due to improved margins
from installation services, as well as improved product margins resulting from increased sales to
the metal and non-woven industries, which carry higher margins than sales to the paper industry.
Product Margin
Product gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 78% for the first quarter of 2011 compared to
76% for the first quarter of 2010. This increase was primarily due to higher MVSD product margins
as described above.
17
Table of Contents
Service Margin
Service gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 40% for the first quarter of 2011 compared to
30% for the first quarter of 2010. The increase in service margin was primarily due to improved
margins from SISD installation services.
Operating Expenses
Research, Development, and Engineering Expenses
Research, development, and engineering (RD&E) expenses for the first quarter of 2011 increased
$1,379,000, or 17%, from the prior year. MVSD RD&E expenses increased by $1,461,000, or 20%, and
SISD RD&E expenses decreased $82,000, or 9%.
The table below details the $1,461,000 net increase in MVSD RD&E expenses in the first quarter of
2011:
MVSD RD&E balance in Q1 2010 |
$ | 7,232 | ||
Personnel-related costs |
834 | |||
Stock-based compensation expense |
571 | |||
Other |
56 | |||
MVSD RD&E balance in Q1 2011 |
$ | 8,693 | ||
Over the past few quarters, the Company has increased RD&E headcount in strategic areas, resulting
in higher personnel-related costs, such as salaries, fringe benefits, and recruiting expense. The
majority of the headcount increase was in lower-cost regions, such as Hungary. In addition, the
Company recorded increased stock-based compensation expense due to the timing of the annual stock
option grant, which occurred in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of
2010.
The decrease in SISD RD&E expenses in the first quarter of 2011 was primarily due to a change in
personnel mix, resulting in savings in salaries, fringe benefits, company bonus expense, and
stock-based compensation expense ($122,000). These savings were partially offset by increased
materials costs related to product development efforts ($59,000).
RD&E expenses as a percentage of revenue were 13% in the first quarter of 2011 and 14% in the
first quarter of 2010. We believe that a continued commitment to RD&E activities is essential in
order to maintain or achieve product leadership with our existing products and to provide
innovative new product offerings, and therefore, we expect to continue to make RD&E investments in
the future in strategic areas, such as the ID products business and further development of a
Vision System on a Chip. In addition, we consider our ability to accelerate time to market for
new products critical to our revenue growth. Although we target our RD&E spending to be between
10% and 15% of revenue, this percentage is impacted by revenue levels.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the first quarter of 2011 increased by
$5,539,000, or 23%, from the prior year. MVSD SG&A expenses increased $5,373,000, or 32%, while
SISD SG&A expenses increased $215,000, or 8%. Corporate expenses that are not allocated to either
division decreased by $49,000, or 1%.
The table below details the $5,373,000 net increase in MVSD SG&A expenses in the first quarter of
2011:
MVSD SG&A expenses in Q1 2010 |
$ | 16,914 | ||
Personnel-related costs |
2,432 | |||
Stock-based compensation expense |
1,055 | |||
Marketing and promotional expenses |
712 | |||
Foreign currency exchange rate changes |
384 | |||
Sales demonstration equipment |
213 | |||
Other |
577 | |||
MVSD SG&A expenses in Q1 2011 |
$ | 22,287 | ||
18
Table of Contents
Over the past few quarters, the Company has increased SG&A headcount in strategic areas, resulting
in higher personnel-related costs, such as salaries, fringe benefits, recruiting, commissions, and
travel expense. The majority of the headcount increase was in lower-cost regions, such as China.
In addition, the Company recorded increased stock-based compensation expense due to the timing of
the annual stock option grant, which occurred in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the
second quarter of 2010. Furthermore, stock-based compensation expense in the first quarter of
2010 included a high level of credits related to forfeited options. Other increases included
higher spending on marketing and promotional activities intended to grow factory automation
revenue, the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the
Japanese Yen, and higher spending on sales demonstration equipment as a result of new product
offerings.
The increase in SISD SG&A expenses was primarily due to increased bad debt expenses ($102,000),
higher stock-based compensation expense due to the timing of the annual stock option grant
($56,000), and the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the
Japanese Yen ($39,000).
The decrease in corporate expenses was due to lower legal fees primarily related to patent
infringement actions ($1,362,000). These savings were partially offset by increased stock-based
compensation and related option valuation fees due to the timing of the annual stock option grant
($582,000), costs associated with the Companys 30th Anniversary parties held in the
first quarter of 2011 ($480,000), the timing of audit and proxy fees ($148,000), and increased
company bonus accruals related to employees assigned to the Companys corporate departments
($138,000).
Nonoperating Income (Expense)
The Company recorded a foreign currency loss of $59,000 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to a
loss of $165,000 for the first quarter of 2010. The foreign currency losses in each period
resulted primarily from the revaluation and settlement of accounts receivable and intercompany
balances that are reported in one currency and collected in another. Although the foreign
currency exposure of accounts receivable is largely mitigated through the use of forward
contracts, this program depends upon forecasts of sales and collections, and therefore, gains or
losses on the underlying receivables may not perfectly offset losses or gains on the contracts.
Investment income for the first quarter of 2011 increased $348,000, or 135%, from the first
quarter of 2010, due to increased investment of the Companys excess cash. Beginning in the
second quarter of 2010, the Board of Directors approved a change to the Companys investment
policy to allow management to invest excess cash accumulated in the Companys international
entities in debt securities. This change in policy has also resulted in increased investment
income compared to the first quarter of 2010.
The Company recorded other expense of $205,000 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to other
expense of $246,000 in the first quarter of 2010. Other income (expense) includes rental income,
net of associated expenses, from leasing buildings adjacent to the Companys corporate
headquarters. A portion of this space is currently unoccupied.
Income Tax Expense
The Companys effective tax rate was 23% in both the first quarter of 2011 and 2010. There were
no discrete tax events in either period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has historically been able to generate positive cash flow from operations, which has
funded its operating activities and other cash requirements and has resulted in an accumulated
cash, cash equivalent, and investment balance of $316,425,000 as of April 3, 2011. The Company
has established guidelines relative to credit ratings, diversification, and maturities of its
investments that maintain liquidity.
19
Table of Contents
The Companys cash requirements during the first quarter of 2011 were met with its existing cash
balances, cash from investment maturities, positive cash flows from operations, and the proceeds
from stock option
exercises. Cash requirements primarily consisted of operating activities, purchases of
investments, capital expenditures, and the payment of dividends. During the first quarter of
2011, the Company paid out approximately $7,000,000 in company bonuses related to fiscal year
2010, and also made further working capital investments in inventories to support higher
anticipated business volumes. Capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2011 totaled
$1,577,000 and consisted primarily of expenditures for computer hardware and manufacturing test
equipment for new product introductions.
In June 2000, the Company became a Limited Partner in Venrock Associates III, L.P. (Venrock), a
venture capital fund. The Company has committed to a total investment in the limited partnership
of up to $20,500,000, with the commitment period expiring on December 31, 2013. The Company does
not have the right to withdraw from the partnership prior to December 31, 2013. As of April 3,
2011, the Company had contributed $19,886,000 to the partnership. No contributions were made and
no distributions were received in the first quarter of 2011. The remaining commitment of $614,000
can be called by Venrock in any period through December 31, 2013.
Beginning in the third quarter of 2003, the Companys Board of Directors has declared and paid a
cash dividend in each quarter, including a dividend of $0.08 per share that amounted to $3,316,000
in the first quarter of 2011. Future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the
Companys Board of Directors and will depend upon such factors as the Board deems relevant
including, among other things, the Companys ability to generate positive cash flows from
operations.
In April 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50,000,000 of
the Companys common stock. As of April 3, 2011, the Company had repurchased 1,038,797 shares at
a cost of $20,000,000 under this program. The Company did not purchase any shares under this
program during the first quarter of 2011. The Company may repurchase shares under this program in
future periods depending upon a variety of factors, including, among other things, the stock price
level, share availability, and cash reserve requirements.
The Company believes that its existing cash, cash equivalent, and investment balances, together
with cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to meet its operating, investing, and financing
activities for the next twelve months. As of April 3, 2011, the Company had approximately
$310,492,000 in either cash or investments that could be converted into cash. In addition, Cognex
has no long-term debt and does not anticipate needing debt financing in the near future. We
believe that our strong cash position has put us in a relatively good postion with respect to our
longer-term liquidity needs.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes to the Companys exposures to market risk since December 31,
2010.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has
evaluated, with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in such rules) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that such disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of that date. From time to time, the Company reviews its disclosure
controls and procedures, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their
effectiveness and to ensure that the Companys systems evolve with its business. There was no
change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter
ended April 3, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
20
Table of Contents
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In May 2008, the Company filed a complaint against MvTec Software GmbH, MvTec
LLC, and Fuji America Corporation in the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts alleging infringement of certain patents owned by the
Company. In April 2009 and again in June 2009, Defendant MvTec Software GmbH filed
re-examination requests of the patents-at-issue with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office. This matter is ongoing.
In May 2009, the Company pre-filed a complaint with the United States International
Trade Commission (ITC) pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. §1337, against MvTec Software GmbH, MvTec LLC, Fuji America, and several
other respondents alleging unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the
unlawful importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the
United States after importation. By this filing, the Company requested the ITC to
investigate the Companys contention that certain machine vision software, machine
vision systems, and products containing the same infringe, and respondents directly
infringe and/or actively induce and/or contribute to the infringement in the United
States, of one or more of the Companys U.S. patents. In July 2009, the ITC issued
an order that it would institute an investigation based upon the Companys
assertions. In September 2009, the Company reached a settlement with two of the
respondents, and in December 2009, the Company reached a settlement with five
additional respondents. In March 2010, the Company reached a settlement with
respondent Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and its subsidiary Fuji America
Corporation. These settlements did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial results. An ITC hearing was held in May 2010. In July 2010, the
Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination finding two of the Companys
patents invalid and that respondents did not infringe the patents-at-issue. In
September 2010, the Commission issued a notice that it would review the initial
determination of the Administrative Law Judge. The ITC issued its Final
Determination in November 2010 in which it determined to modify-in-part and
affirm-in-part the Administrative Law Judges determination, and terminate the
investigation with a finding of no violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(as amended 19 U.S.C. §1337). The Company has filed an appeal of the decision with
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
The Company cannot predict the outcome of the above-referenced pending matters and an
adverse resolution of these lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position, liquidity, results of operations, and/or
indemnification obligations. In addition, various other claims and legal proceedings
generally incidental to the normal course of business are pending or threatened on
behalf of or against the Company. While we cannot predict the outcome of these
incidental matters, we believe that any liability arising from them will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity, or results of
operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
For a complete list of factors that could affect the Companys business, results of
operations, and financial condition, see the risk factors discussion provided in Part
I Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010. The language below has been added to an existing risk factor
previously defined on Form 10-K to address the current risks associated with
international sales.
Economic, political, and other risks associated with international sales and
operations could adversely affect our business and operating results.
On March 11, 2011, a large earthquake hit the northeast region of Japan. The
majority of our customers located in Japan are outside of the affected areas.
Certain customers requested that orders totaling approximately $800,000, originally
scheduled for March shipment, be pushed to April. The remaining orders that were on
the backlog at the time of
21
Table of Contents
the earthquake, and any new orders, were fulfilled from our Cork, Ireland
distribution center. Our Koriyama, Japan distribution center suspended shipments for
approximately five weeks, but began shipping product again in April. Cognex does not
manufacture in Japan.
Our key suppliers located in Japan have told us that they are up and running, subject
to power outages. Cognex has a policy of maintaining strategic inventory reserves of
critical components. We have taken action to secure additional reserves of
Japanese-manufactured critical parts, such as imagers. For this reason, we do not
expect significant supply disruption as result of the earthquake. There is
uncertainty, however, regarding how demand from our customers will be impacted in the
second quarter and beyond, as the aftermath of this disaster continues to unfold
through layers of the supply chain.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases by the Company
of shares of its Common Stock during the periods indicated.
Approximate | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Dollar Value of | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as | May Yet Be | |||||||||||||||
Total | Part of Publicly | Purchased | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Announced | Under the | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Plans or | Plans or | |||||||||||||
Purchased | per Share | Programs (1) | Programs | |||||||||||||
January 1 - January 30, 2011 |
| | | $ | 30,000,000 | |||||||||||
January 31 - February 27, 2011 |
| | | $ | 30,000,000 | |||||||||||
February 28 - April 3, 2011 |
| | | $ | 30,000,000 | |||||||||||
Total |
| | | $ | 30,000,000 |
(1) | In April 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50,000,000 of the Companys common stock. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
22
Table of Contents
101 xBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language)
The following materials from Cognex Corporations Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2011, formatted in xBRL: (i) Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the quarter ended April 3, 2011; (ii) Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of April 3, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (iii) Consolidated
Statement of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the quarter
ended April 3, 2011; (iv) Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for
the quarter ended April 3, 2011; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
* | Filed herewith | |
** | Furnished herewith | |
*** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the xBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
23
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 2, 2011 | COGNEX CORPORATION |
|||
By: | /s/ Robert J. Willett | |||
Robert J. Willett | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (duly authorized officer, principal executive officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ Richard A. Morin | |||
Richard A. Morin | ||||
Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (duly authorized officer, principal financial and accounting officer) |
24