Cohen & Co Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2010

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 001-32026

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 701-9555

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    ¨  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of July 31, 2010 there were 10,478,682 shares of common stock ($0.001 par value per share) of Cohen & Company Inc. outstanding.

Table of Contents

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2010

Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

While we cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties, they include, but are not limited to, those described in “Item 1A—Risk Factors” included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, such information should not be regarded as representations that the results or conditions described in such statements or that our objectives and plans will be achieved and we do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about the following subjects:

These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You should consider the areas of risk and uncertainty described above and discussed under “Item 1A—Risk Factors” included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as the fact, with respect to the potential proceeds of the sale of the management rights and responsibilities relating to the Alesco I-IX securitizations, that the necessary consents to the sale of such management rights and responsibilities will not be obtained and the fact that the earn-out payments that may be earned in connection with the sale of management rights and responsibilities relating to the Alesco X-XVII securitizations and the potential sale of management rights and responsibilities relating to the Alesco I-IX securitizations may differ materially from the Company’s projections due to prepayments and defaults experienced by the assets in the securitizations and/or reductions in collateral management fees earned from the contract rights. You are cautioned not to place undue

Table of Contents

reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

Table of Contents

Certain Terms Used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise noted or as the context otherwise requires: “the Company,” “Cohen & Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refers to the combined company Cohen & Company Inc. and its subsidiaries; “Cohen Brothers,” refers to either (i) the pre-merger Cohen Brothers, LLC (which did business as Cohen & Company) and its subsidiaries or (ii) post-merger, the main operating subsidiary of the Company; “AFN” refers to the pre-merger Alesco Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries; “Merger Agreement” refers to the Agreement and Plan of Merger among AFN, Alesco Financial Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of AFN that we refer to as the “Merger Sub,” and Cohen Brothers, dated as of February 20, 2009 and amended on June 1, 2009, August 20, 2009 and September 30, 2009; “Merger” refers to the December 16, 2009 closing of the merger of Merger Sub with and into Cohen Brothers pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, which resulted in Cohen Brothers becoming a majority owned subsidiary of the Company.

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or “U.S. GAAP,” the Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, Cohen Brothers was deemed to be the accounting acquirer and all of AFN’s assets and liabilities were required to be revalued at fair value as of the acquisition date, therefore, the financials reported herein are the historical financials of Cohen Brothers. As used throughout this filing, the terms, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the operations of Cohen Brothers and its consolidated subsidiaries from January 1, 2009 through to December 16, 2009 and the combined operations of the merged company and its consolidated subsidiaries from December 17, 2009 forward. AFN refers to the historical operations of Alesco Financial Inc. through to December 16, 2009, the date of the Merger, or the Merger Date.

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands, except share or unit and per share or per unit information)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

COHEN & COMPANY INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in Thousands, except share or unit and per share or per unit information)

(Unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

The Formation Transaction

Cohen Brothers, LLC (d/b/a Cohen & Company) (“Cohen Brothers”) was formed on October 7, 2004 by Cohen Bros. Financial, LLC (“CBF”). Cohen Brothers is the majority owned operating subsidiary of Cohen & Company Inc. (see description of the Company below). Cohen Brothers was formed to acquire the net assets of CBF’s subsidiaries (the “Formation Transaction”): Cohen Bros. & Company, Inc.; Cohen Frères SAs; Dekania Investors, LLC; Emporia Capital Management, LLC; and the majority interest in Cohen Bros. & Tororian Investment Management, Inc. The Formation Transaction was accomplished through a series of transactions occurring between March 4, 2005 and May 31, 2005.

The Company

On December 16, 2009, Cohen Brothers completed its merger (the “Merger”) with a subsidiary of Alesco Financial Inc. (“AFN”) (now Cohen & Company Inc.), in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger among AFN, Alesco Financial Holdings, LLC (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of AFN, and Cohen Brothers, dated as of February 20, 2009 and amended on June 1, 2009, August 20, 2009 and September 30, 2009 (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which the Merger Sub merged with and into Cohen Brothers, with Cohen Brothers as the surviving entity and majority owned subsidiary of Cohen & Company Inc.

Prior to the Merger, AFN was a holding company that held its consolidated assets and conducted its operations primarily through its majority-owned subsidiaries. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, AFN contributed to Merger Sub substantially all of its assets and certain of its liabilities not already owned, directly or indirectly, by Merger Sub and retained obligations under its outstanding convertible senior debt and junior subordinated notes. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each holder of a Cohen Brothers Class A membership unit, together with one Cohen Brothers Class B membership unit, with respect to such membership units, received either: (1) 0.57372 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), of the Company, or (2) retained 0.57372 new membership units in Cohen Brothers.

In connection with the Merger, the Company received 10,343,347 of new membership units in Cohen Brothers. Cohen Brothers had a total of 15,626,903 units outstanding as of the date of the Merger giving the Company an effective ownership of 66.2% of Cohen Brothers.

Of the 5,283,556 Cohen Brothers membership units not held by the Company, Daniel G. Cohen, through CBF, a single member LLC, holds 4,983,557 Cohen Brothers membership units. Each of Mr. Cohen’s Cohen Brothers membership units is redeemable at Mr. Cohen’s option, at any time on or after January 1, 2013, for (i) cash in amount equal to the average of the per share closing prices of the Company’s Common Stock for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date the Company receives Mr. Cohen’s redemption notice, or (ii) at the Company’s option, one share of the Company’s Common Stock, subject, in each case, to appropriate adjustment upon the occurrence of the issuance of additional shares of the Company’s Common Stock as a dividend or other distribution on the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, or a further subdivision or combination of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Other members of Cohen Brothers hold a total of 299,999 units. These units have the same redemption rights as described for Mr. Cohen except that the members holding these units may elect to redeem their shares at any time.

In exchange for all of his Cohen Brothers Class C membership units, Mr. Cohen, through CBF, received one share of the Company’s Series A Voting Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), which has no economic rights but gives Mr. Cohen the right to nominate and elect a number equal to at least one-third (but less than a majority) of the total number of directors on the Company’s board of directors.

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), the transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, and Cohen Brothers was deemed to be the accounting acquirer and all of AFN’s assets and liabilities were required to be revalued at fair value as of the acquisition date. As used in these consolidated financial statements, the term “the Company” refers to the operations of Cohen Brothers and its consolidated subsidiaries from January 1, 2009 through to December 16, 2009 and the combined operations of the merged company and its consolidated subsidiaries subsequent to December 17, 2009. “AFN” refers to the historical operations of Alesco Financial Inc. through the December 16, 2009 Merger Date.

AFN, a Maryland corporation, resulted from a reverse merger between Alesco Financial Trust, a private Maryland real estate

5

Table of Contents

investment trust (“REIT”), and a subsidiary of Sunset Financial Resources (“Sunset”), a publicly-traded Maryland REIT, which merger was completed on October 6, 2006, and was traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “AFN.” AFN was a specialty finance company that invested in multiple target asset classes, subject to maintaining its qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and its exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company ceased to qualify as a REIT. On December 17, 2009, the Company began trading on the NYSE Amex under the ticker symbol “COHN.” The Company, through its subsidiaries, is an investment firm specializing in credit-related fixed income investments. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $14.5 billion in assets under management (“AUM”).

The Company’s business is organized into three business segments:

Capital Markets: The Company’s Capital Markets segment consists of credit-related fixed income securities sales and trading as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products and advisory revenue. The Company’s fixed income sales and trading group provides trade execution to corporate and institutional investors. The Company specializes in the following products: high grade corporate bonds, high yield corporate bonds and loans, asset backed securities (“ABS”), mortgage backed securities (“MBS”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), collateralized bond obligations, commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”), hybrid capital of financial institutions including trust preferred securities (“TruPS”), whole loans, and other structured financial instruments. During the first half of 2010, the Company added a team to originate and trade brokered deposits or CDs for small banks as well as established an agency brokerage business offering execution and brokerage services for cash equity and derivative products.

Asset Management: The Company serves the needs of client investors by managing assets within investment funds, managed accounts, permanent capital vehicles, and collateralized debt obligations (collectively referred to as “Investment Vehicles”). A collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) is a form of secured borrowing. The borrowing is secured by different types of fixed income assets such as corporate or mortgage loans or bonds. The borrowing is in the form of a securitization which means that the lenders are actually investing in notes backed by the assets. The lender will have recourse only to the assets securing the loan. The Company’s Asset Management segment includes its fee based asset management operations which include ongoing base and incentive management fees.

Principal Investing: The Company’s Principal Investing segment is comprised primarily of its seed capital investments in Investment Vehicles it manages.

The Company generates its revenue by segment primarily through the following activities:

Capital Markets:

Asset Management:

Principal Investing:

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The financial statements of the Company included herein were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The information furnished includes all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of

6

Table of Contents

results for the interim periods. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any subsequent interim period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A. Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets

In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (“ASU 2009-16”), which formally codifies the new guidance on the accounting for transfers of financial assets issued in June 2009. The new guidance seeks to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. Specifically, the new guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, creates more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies other sale-accounting criteria, and changes the initial measurement of a transferor’s interest in transferred financial assets. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets as of January 1, 2010 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Variable Interest Entities

In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810) – Improvements in Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (“ASU 2009-17”), which formally codifies the revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities (“VIE” or “VIEs”) issued in June 2009. The revised guidance deals with determining whether an entity is a VIE and requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a VIE. Under the revised guidance, an enterprise has a controlling financial interest when it has (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The revised guidance also requires an enterprise to assess whether it has an implicit responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed when determining whether it has power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The revised guidance also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, requires enhanced disclosures and eliminates the scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities. The revised guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. However, in February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-10, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendment for Certain Investment Funds (“ASU 2010-10”) which delayed the effective date of the revised guidance for an interest in an entity (1) that has all the attributes of an investment company or (2) for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral does not apply in situations in which a reporting entity has the explicit or implicit obligation to fund losses of an entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. The deferral also does not apply to interests in securitization entities, asset-backed financing entities, or entities formerly considered qualifying special purpose entities. The amendments also clarify that for entities that do not qualify for the deferral, related parties should be considered when evaluating the specified criteria for determining whether a decision maker or service provider fee represents a variable interest. In addition, the requirements for evaluating whether a decision maker’s or service provider’s fee is a variable interest are modified to clarify the FASB’s intention that a quantitative calculation should not be the sole basis for this evaluation. The amendments included in ASU 2010-10 do not defer the disclosure requirements included in ASU 2009-17. The Company’s adoption of the revised guidance, as modified by the deferral, on variable interest entities as of January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for VIEs that it was involved with as of January 1, 2010 based on the Company’s analysis as of that date. However, this is an ongoing assessment and it may impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the future. See note 10 for additional disclosures provided about VIEs.

Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 requires some new disclosures and clarifies some

7

Table of Contents

existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“FASB ASC 820”). ASU 2010-06 amends FASB ASC 820 to require a reporting entity: (1) to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and (2) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures: (1) for purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities, and (2) a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. Since the provisions in ASU No. 2010-06 require only additional disclosures concerning fair value measurements, the Company’s adoption of the provisions that were effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2009 during the first quarter of 2010 did not affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company has included the required disclosures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

B. Recent Accounting Developments

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Credit Derivatives (“ASU 2010-11”). ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. According to this guidance, the only form of embedded credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption is one that is related to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. Entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. ASU 2010-11 is effective for fiscal quarters beginning after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the new accounting guidance to have any impact upon its adoption on July 1, 2010 on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

C. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments. These determinations were based on available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates and, therefore, these estimates may not necessarily be indicative of the amount the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. Refer to note 6 for a discussion of the fair value hierarchy.

Cash and cash equivalents: Both restricted and unrestricted cash are carried at historical cost which is assumed to approximate fair value.

Investments-trading: These amounts are carried at fair value. The fair value is based on either quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent broker market quotations, or valuation models when quotations are not available.

Other investments, at fair value: These amounts are carried at fair value. The fair value is based on quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent broker market quotations, or valuation models when quotations are not available.

Receivables under resale agreements: Receivables under resale agreements are carried at their contracted resale price, have short-term maturities (one year or less), and are repriced frequently or bear market interest rates and, accordingly, these contracts are at amounts that approximate fair value.

Securities sold, not yet purchased: These amounts are carried at fair value. The fair value is based on quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent market quotations, or valuation models when quotations are not available.

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase: The liability for securities sold under agreement to repurchase are carried at their contracted repurchase price, and are very short-term in nature, and are repriced frequently with amounts normally due in one month or less and, accordingly, these contracts are at amounts that approximate fair value.

Debt: These amounts are carried at outstanding principal less unamortized discount. However, a substantial portion of the debt was assumed in the Merger and recorded at fair value as of that date. As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated to be $56.1 million.

Derivatives: These amounts are carried at fair value. The fair value is based on quoted market prices on an exchange that is deemed to be active.

8

Table of Contents

4. RESTRICTED CASH AND RECEIVABLES FROM AND PAYABLES TO BROKERS, DEALERS, AND CLEARING AGENCIES

Amounts receivable from and payable to brokers, dealers and clearing agencies consists of the following at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

RECEIVABLES FROM BROKERS, DEALERS, AND CLEARING AGENCIES

(Dollars in Thousands)

PAYABLES TO BROKERS, DEALERS, AND CLEARING AGENCIES

(Dollars in Thousands)

Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date, as if they had settled. The related amounts receivable and payable for unsettled securities transactions are recorded net in receivables from or payables to brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. All of the unsettled regular way trades as of June 30, 2010 were settled subsequent to June 30, 2010 at their recorded values. The Company incurred interest on margin payable of $112 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $18 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company held restricted cash of $22,440 and $255 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Of the $22,440 of restricted cash at June 30, 2010, the Company had $20,143 of restricted cash related to certain short sales it had entered into, $1,297 of restricted cash on deposit related to outstanding foreign currency forward contracts and EuroDollar futures contracts, and $1,000 of restricted cash on deposit with clearing brokers and counterparties of repurchase agreement transactions and agency trades during the current period.

5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Investments—Trading

The following table provides a detail of the investments classified as investments-trading as of the periods indicated:

INVESTMENTS—TRADING

(Dollars in Thousands)

9

Table of Contents

Trading Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased

The following table shows the cost and carrying value of all trading securities sold, not yet purchased as of the periods indicated:

TRADING SECURITIES SOLD, NOT YET PURCHASED

(Dollars in Thousands)

The Company recognized $6,691 and $(1,354) of trading gains (losses) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, that relate to investments –trading still held at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

10

Table of Contents

Other Investments, at fair value

The following table provides detail of the investments included within other investments, at fair value as of the periods indicated.

OTHER INVESTMENTS, AT FAIR VALUE

(Dollars in Thousands)

The Company has granted its bank debt lenders a security interest in substantially all securities that are currently included in other investments, at fair value.

6. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Fair Value Option

The Company has elected to account for certain of its other financial assets at fair value under the fair value option provisions of FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments (“FASB ASC 825”). The primary reasons for electing the fair value option when it first became available in 2008, was to reduce the burden of monitoring the differences between the cost and the fair value of the

11

Table of Contents

Company’s investments, previously classified as available for sale securities, including the assessment as to whether the declines are temporary in nature and to further remove an element of management judgment.

Such financial assets accounted for at fair value include:

The changes in fair value (realized and unrealized gains and losses) of these instruments for which the Company has elected the fair value option are recorded in principal transactions and other income in the consolidated statements of operations. All of the investments for which the Company has elected the fair value option are included as a component of other investments, at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company recognized $16,825 and $1,859 of gains related to changes in fair value of investments for which it had elected the fair value option during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company recognized $6,026 and $2,652 of gains related to changes in fair value of investments for which it had elected the fair value option during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with FASB ASC 820, the Company has categorized its financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are described below:

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that the Company has classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the tables below may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities) inputs.

A review of the fair value hierarchy classifications is conducted on a quarterly basis. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain financial assets or liabilities. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Reclassifications impacting Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are reported as transfers in/out of the Level 3 category as of the beginning of the quarter in which reclassifications occur.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

12

Table of Contents

as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS ON A RECURRING BASIS

(Dollars in Thousands)