Cohen & Co Inc. - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,  D.C. 20549 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

x     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2013 

OR

¨     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-32026

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 701-9555

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x    Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of August 1, 2013, there were 12,222,666 shares of common stock ($0.001 par value per share) of Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. outstanding. 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC. 

FORM 10-Q

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2013

 

---

 

Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

While we cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties, they include, but are not limited to, those described in “Item 1A—Risk Factors” included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended. Accordingly, such information should not be regarded as representations that the results or conditions described in such statements or that our objectives and plans will be achieved and we do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about the following subjects:

•    benefits, results, cost reductions and synergies resulting from the Company’s business combinations;

•     integration of operations;

•    business strategies;

•     growth opportunities;

•    competitive position;

•     market outlook;

•    expected financial position;

•     expected results of operations;

•    future cash flows;

•     financing plans;

•    plans and objectives of management;

•     tax treatment of business combinations;

•    fair value of assets; and

•     any other statements regarding future growth, future cash needs, future operations, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.

These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You should consider the areas of risk and uncertainty described above and discussed under “Item 1A—Risk Factors” included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

---

 

Certain Terms Used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise noted or as the context otherwise requires: “IFMI” refers to Institutional Financial Markets, Inc., a Maryland corporation. The “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to IFMI and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis; “IFMI, LLC” (formerly Cohen Brothers, LLC) or the “Operating LLC” refer to IFMI, LLC, the main operating subsidiary of the Company; “Cohen Brothers” refers to the pre-merger Cohen Brothers, LLC and its subsidiaries; “AFN” refers to the pre-merger Alesco Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries; “Merger Agreement” refers to the Agreement and Plan of Merger among AFN Alesco Financial Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of AFN, which we refer to as the “Merger Sub,” and Cohen Brothers, dated as of February 20, 2009 and amended on June 1, 2009, August 20, 2009, and September 30, 2009; “Merger” refers to the December 16, 2009 closing of the merger of Merger Sub with and into Cohen Brothers pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, which resulted in Cohen Brothers becoming a majority owned subsidiary of the Company. When the term, “IFMI” is used, it is referring to the parent company itself, Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. “JVB Holdings” refers to JVB Holdings, L.L.C.; “JVB” refers to JVB Financial Group, LLC, a broker dealer subsidiary; “CCFL” refers to Cohen & Company Financial Limited (formerly known as EuroDekania Management LTD), a subsidiary regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (formerly known as the Financial Services Authority) in the United Kingdom; “CCPRH” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge Holdings LP (formerly known as PrinceRidge Holdings LP) and its subsidiaries; “PrinceRidge GP” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge Partners LLC (formerly known as PrinceRidge Partners LLC); “PrinceRidge” refers to CCPRH together with PrinceRidge GP; and “CCPR” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge LLC (formerly known as The PrinceRidge Group LLC), a broker dealer subsidiary.

“Securities Act” refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; and “Exchange Act” refers to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or “U.S. GAAP,” the Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, Cohen Brothers was deemed to be the accounting acquirer and all of AFN’s assets and liabilities were required to be revalued at fair value as of the acquisition date. Therefore, any financial information reported herein prior to the Merger is the historical financial information of Cohen Brothers. As used throughout this filing, the terms, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the operations of Cohen Brothers and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to December 17, 2009 and the combined operations of the merged company and its consolidated subsidiaries from December 17, 2009 forward. AFN refers to the historical operations of Alesco Financial Inc. through to December 16, 2009, the date of the Merger, or the “Merger Date.” 

---

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

 

                                              See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME / (LOSS)

(Dollars in Thousands, except share or per share information)

(Unaudited)

 

                                          See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

   

 

 

 

---

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

                                           See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

---

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in Thousands, except share or per share information)

(Unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

The Formation Transaction

Cohen Brothers was formed on October 7, 2004 by Cohen Bros. Financial, LLC (“CBF”). Cohen Brothers was established to acquire the net assets of CBF’s subsidiaries (the “Formation Transaction”): Cohen Bros. & Company, Inc.; Cohen Frères SAS; Dekania Investors, LLC; Emporia Capital Management, LLC; and the majority interest in Cohen Bros. & Tororian Investment Management, Inc. The Formation Transaction was accomplished through a series of transactions occurring between March 4, 2005 and May 31, 2005.

The Company

From its formation until December 16, 2009, Cohen Brothers operated as a privately owned limited liability company. On December 16, 2009, Cohen Brothers completed its merger (the “Merger”) with a subsidiary of Alesco Financial Inc. (“AFN”) a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

As a result of the Merger, AFN contributed substantially all of its assets into Cohen Brothers in exchange for newly issued membership units directly from Cohen Brothers. In addition, AFN received additional Cohen Brothers membership interests directly from its members in exchange for AFN common stock. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), the Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, and Cohen Brothers was deemed to be the accounting acquirer. As a result, all of AFN’s assets and liabilities were required to be revalued at fair value as of the acquisition date. The remaining membership interests of Cohen Brothers that are not held by AFN are included as a component of non-controlling interest in the consolidated balance sheet.

Subsequent to the Merger, AFN was renamed Cohen & Company Inc. In January 2011, it was renamed again as Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. (“IFMI”). Effective January 1, 2010, the Company ceased to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT. The Company trades on the NYSE MKT LLC (formerly known as the NYSE Amex LLC) under the ticker symbol “IFMI.” The Company is a financial services company specializing in credit related fixed income investments. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $6.2 billion in assets under management (“AUM”) of which 95% or $5.9 billion, was in collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”).

In these financial statements, the “Company” refers to IFMI and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis; “IFMI, LLC” (formerly Cohen Brothers, LLC) or the “Operating LLC” refers to the main operating subsidiary of the Company; “Cohen Brothers” refers to the pre-Merger Cohen Brothers, LLC and its subsidiaries; “AFN” refers to the pre-merger Alesco Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries. When the term “IFMI” is used, it is referring to the parent company itself, Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. “JVB Holdings” refers to JVB Financial Holdings, L.L.C.; “JVB” refers to JVB Financial Group LLC, a broker dealer subsidiary; “CCFL” refers to Cohen & Company Financial Limited (formerly known as EuroDekania Management LTD), a subsidiary regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (formerly known as Financial Services Authority) in the United Kingdom; “CCPRH” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge Holdings LP (formerly known as PrinceRidge Holdings LP) and its subsidiaries; “PrinceRidge GP” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge Partners LLC, (formerly known as PrinceRidge Partners LLC). “PrinceRidge” refers to CCPRH together with PrinceRidge GP; and “CCPR” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge LLC (formerly known as The PrinceRidge Group LLC), a broker dealer subsidiary.

The Company’s business is organized into the following three business segments:

Capital Markets: The Company’s Capital Markets business segment consists primarily of credit-related fixed income securities sales, trading, and financing, as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products and advisory services. The Company’s fixed income sales and trading group provides trade execution to corporate investors, institutional investors and other smaller broker-dealers. The Company specializes in a variety of products, including but not limited to: corporate bonds and loans, asset backed securities (“ABS”), mortgage backed securities (“MBS”), commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”), residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”), CDOs, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), municipal securities, to-be-announced securities (“TBAs”) contracts, Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans, U.S. government bonds, U.S. government agency securities, brokered deposits and CDs for small banks, hybrid capital of financial institutions including trust preferred securities (“TruPS”), whole loans, and other structured financial instruments. The Company also offers execution and brokerage services for equity products. The Company had offered execution and brokerage services for equity derivative products until December 31, 2012 when the Company sold its equity derivatives brokerage business to a new entity owned by two of the Company’s former employees. See note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended. The

---

 

Company carries out its capital market activities primarily through its subsidiaries: JVB and PrinceRidge in the United States, and CCFL in Europe.  

Asset Management: The Company’s Asset Management business segment manages assets within CDOs, permanent capital vehicles, managed accounts, and investment funds (collectively referred to as “Investment Vehicles”). A CDO is a form of secured borrowing. The borrowing is secured by different types of fixed income assets such as corporate or mortgage loans or bonds. The borrowing is in the form of a securitization, which means that the lenders are actually investing in notes backed by the assets. In the event of default, the lenders will have recourse only to the assets securing the loan. The Company’s Asset Management business segment includes its fee-based asset management operations which include ongoing base and incentive management fees.

Principal Investing: The Company’s Principal Investing business segment is comprised primarily of its investments in certain Investment Vehicles it manages, as well as investments in structured products, and the related gains and losses that they generate.

The Company generates its revenue by business segment primarily through the following activities:

Capital Markets:

•       trading activities of the Company, which include execution and brokerage services, securities lending activities, riskless trading activities as well as gains and losses (unrealized and realized) and income and expense earned on securities classified as trading;

•      new issue and advisory revenue comprised primarily of (i) origination fees for corporate debt issues originated by the Company; (ii) revenue from advisory services; and (iii) new issue revenue associated with arranging and placing the issuance of newly created debt, equity, and hybrid financial instruments;

Asset Management:

•       asset management fees for the Company’s on-going asset management services provided to certain Investment Vehicles, which may include fees both senior and subordinate to the securities in the Investment Vehicle; and incentive management fees earned based on the performance of the various Investment Vehicles; and

•       income or loss from equity method affiliates.

Principal Investing:

•      gains and losses (unrealized and realized) and income and expense earned on securities (primarily on investments in Investment Vehicles the Company manages) classified as other investments, at fair value; and

•       income or loss from equity method affiliates.

   

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The financial statements of the Company included herein were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The information furnished includes all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim months periods. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any subsequent interim period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended.  

Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended.  

 

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

   

---

 

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A. Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2011-11”), which requires companies to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on a company’s financial position. The amendments require enhanced disclosures by requiring improved information about financial statements and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with current literature, or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with current literature. ASU 2011-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU 2013-01”),  which clarifies that the scope of the intended disclosures required by ASU 2011-11 applies to derivatives accounted for in accordance with Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. ASU 2013-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. An entity is required to provide the disclosures retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The Company’s adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01 effective January 1, 2013 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows since the repurchase agreements, receivables under resale agreements and derivatives that it holds are not subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”), which provides an option for companies to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If a company concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the company is not required to take further action. However, if a company concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Subtopic 350-30. A company also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative assessment in any subsequent period. The Company’s adoption of the provisions of ASU 2012-02 effective January 1, 2013 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”), which includes amendments that require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The amendments do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Early adoption was permitted. Since ASU 2013-02 only impacts disclosures, the Company’s adoption of the provisions of ASU 2013-02 effective January 1, 2013 did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

B. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments. These determinations were based on available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates and, therefore, these estimates may not necessarily be indicative of the amount the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. Refer to note 7 for a discussion of the fair value hierarchy with respect to investments-trading, other investments, at fair value and the derivatives held by the Company.

---

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents: Cash is carried at historical cost, which is assumed to approximate fair value. The estimated fair value measurement of cash and cash equivalents is classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

Investments-trading: These amounts are carried at fair value. The fair value is based on either quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent broker market quotations, market price quotations from third party pricing services, or valuation models when quotations are not available. See note 7 for disclosures about the categorization of the fair value measurements of investments-trading within the three level fair value hierarchy.

Other investments, at fair value: These amounts are carried at fair value. The fair value is based on quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent broker market quotations, or valuation models when quotations are not available. In the case of investments in alternative investment funds, fair value is generally based on the reported net asset value of the underlying fund. See note 7 for disclosures concerning the categorization of the fair value measurements of other investments, at fair value within the three level fair value hierarchy.

Receivables under resale agreements: Receivables under resale agreements are carried at their contracted resale price, have short-term maturities, and are repriced frequently or bear market interest rates and, accordingly, these contracts are at amounts that approximate fair value. The estimated fair value measurements of receivables under resale agreements are based on observations of actual market activity and are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Trading securities sold, not yet purchased: These amounts are carried at fair value. The fair value is based on quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent market quotations, market price quotations from third party pricing services, or valuation models when quotations are not available. See note 7 for disclosures concerning the categorization of the fair value measurements of trading securities sold, not yet purchased within the three level fair value hierarchy.

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase: The liabilities for securities sold under agreement to repurchase are carried at their contracted repurchase price, have short-term maturities, and are repriced frequently with amounts normally due in one month or less and, accordingly, these contracts are at amounts that approximate fair value. The estimated fair value measurements of securities sold under agreement to repurchase are based on observations of actual market activity and are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Debt: These amounts are carried at outstanding principal less unamortized discount. However, a substantial portion of the debt was assumed in the Merger and recorded at fair value as of that date. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of the Company’s debt was estimated to be $36.5 million and $34.6 million, respectively. The estimated fair value measurements of the debt are generally based on discounted cash flow models prepared by the Company’s management primarily using discount rates for similar instruments issued to companies with similar credit risks to the Company and are generally classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivatives: These amounts are carried at fair value. Derivatives may be included as a component of investments-trading; trading securities sold, not yet purchased; and other investments, at fair value. See notes 7 and 8. The fair value is generally based on quoted market prices on an exchange that is deemed to be active for derivative instruments such as foreign currency forward contracts and EuroDollar futures. For derivative instruments, such as TBAs, the fair value is generally based on market price quotations from third party pricing services. See note 7 for disclosures concerning the categorization of the fair value measurements within the three level fair value hierarchy.

C. Recent Accounting Developments

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date, which requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the following: (a) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors; and (b) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. Examples of obligations within the scope of this ASU include debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The guidance in this ASU also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the ASU’s scope that exist at the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year of adoption. An entity may elect to use hindsight for the comparative periods presented in the initial year of adoption (if it changed its accounting as a result of adopting the guidance) and shall disclose that fact. The use of hindsight would allow an entity to recognize, measure, and disclose obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the scope of this ASU in comparative periods using information available at adoption rather than requiring an entity to make judgments about what information it had in each of the prior periods to measure the obligation. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt the provisions of

---

 

ASU 2013-04 effective January 1, 2014 and is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity, which addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. When a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, the partial sale guidance in Section 830-30-40 still applies, specifically, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such an equity method investment. However, this treatment does not apply to an equity method investment that is not a foreign entity. In those instances, the cumulative translation adjustment is released into net income only if the partial sale represents a complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity that contains the equity method investment. Additionally, the amendments in this ASU clarify that the sale of an investment in a foreign entity includes both (1) events that result in the loss of a controlling financial interest in a foreign entity (that is, irrespective of any retained investment) and (2) events that result in an acquirer obtaining control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest immediately before the acquisition date (sometimes referred to as a step acquisition). Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon the occurrence of those events. For public entities, the ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt the provisions of ASU 2013-05 effective January 1, 2014, and the Company does not expect that the adoption of the provisions will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or financial statement disclosures.

 

In June 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-08, Financial Services-Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements,  which changes the approach to the investment company assessment in Topic 946, clarifies the characteristics of an investment company, and provides comprehensive guidance for assessing whether an entity is an investment company. The amendments require an investment company to measure non-controlling ownership interests in other investment companies at fair value rather than using the equity method of accounting.  The amendments also require the following additional disclosures: (a) the fact that the entity is an investment company and is applying the guidance in Topic 946, (b) information about changes, if any, in an entity’s status as an investment company, and (c) information about financial support provided or contractually required to be provided by an investment company to any of its investees.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for an entity’s interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company has investments in the equity securities of investment funds and other non-publicly traded entities that have the attributes of investment companies as currently described in FASB ASC 946-15-2.  The Company will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2014, and is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

   

4. ACQUISITION AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT IN IFMI

Acquisition of Star Asia Manager 

Effective March 1, 2013, Star Asia Manager repurchased its outstanding equity units held by Star Asia Mercury LLC (formerly, Mercury Partners, LLC) (“Mercury”). Star Asia Manager repurchased the units from Mercury for $425 and a note payable of $725. Under the note payable, interest accrues at a variable rate and there is no stated maturity date. See note 12. This agreement between Star Asia Manager and Mercury is referred to herein as the “Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction.”

Prior to the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction, the Company owned 50% of the voting interests in Star Asia Manager and Mercury owned 50%. The Company accounted for its investment under the equity method of accounting. As a result of the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction, the Company obtained 100% voting control of Star Asia Manager. Because the transaction resulted in the Company obtaining control, the Company accounted for the transaction as a business combination as called for under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations. Subsequent to the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction, the Company included Star Asia Manager in its consolidated financial statements.

Under ASC 805, if the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, the acquirer shall report provisional amounts. For a period of up to one year subsequent to the acquisition date

---

 

(the measurement period), the Company can adjust the provisional amounts as it obtains new information regarding the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The following table summarizes the provisional amounts of the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as of March 1, 2013 (dollars in thousands):  

 

 

As provisional amounts, the amounts in the table above are subject to changes during the measurement period. See notes 11 and 19.

(1)    The purchase price represents the cash paid to Mercury of $425; the note payable to Mercury of $725; and the Company’s equity method investment immediately prior to the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction. For purposes of the provisional amounts, the Company has assumed the carrying value of the Company’s equity method investment immediately prior to the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction approximated fair value. As with all provisional purchase accounting amounts, this is subject to adjustment during the measurement period.

(2)    For purposes of the provisional purchase accounting, the Company determined that the excess of the purchase price over the net fair value of tangible assets acquired should entirely be allocated to an intangible asset representing the value of Star Asia Manager’s investment management contract with Star Asia. The Company treated the estimated value as an intangible asset with a finite life. The Company will amortize the intangible asset using the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the asset of 1.3 years. The intangible asset was allocated to the Asset Management business segment. See note 18. As with all provisional purchase accounting amounts, this is subject to adjustment during the measurement period.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, Star Asia Manager (since its acquisition on March 1, 2013) has contributed $1,055 in revenue and $661 in net income to the Company.  The following unaudited pro forma summary presents consolidated information of the Company as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2011:

 

 

 

 

Investments by Mead Park and Daniel G. Cohen

On May 9, 2013, the Company entered into definitive agreements with Mead Park Capital Partners LLC (“Mead Park Capital”) and CBF (an entity owned solely by Daniel G. Cohen), pursuant to which each will make investments in the Company, totaling $13,746 in the aggregate. Mead Park Capital is a vehicle advised by Mead Park Advisors LLC (“Mead Park”) (a registered investment advisor) and controlled by Jack J. DiMaio, Chief Executive Officer and founder of Mead Park. The investment and related actions were unanimously approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (with Daniel G. Cohen abstaining) following the recommendation of the Board’s Special Committee of the Board of Directors, which was formed in connection with the transaction and was comprised of three of the Company’s independent directors. The resulting share issuance is subject to shareholder approval and customary closing conditions. Shareholders representing approximately 52% of those eligible to vote have signed voting agreements in support of the transaction.

---

 

Under the terms of the definitive agreements, Mead Park Capital will purchase 1,949,167 shares of the Company’s common stock and CBF will purchase 800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, in each case, at $2.00 per share for a combined investment of $5,498. In addition, Mead Park Capital will purchase a convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $5,848, which is convertible in accordance with the terms of the note into 1,949,167 shares at $3.00 per share. CBF will purchase a convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $2,400, which is convertible into 800,000 shares at $3.00 per share. The convertible notes will have an 8.0% annual interest rate and will mature in five years following the date of their issuances.    

If no event of default has occurred under the notes, (i) if dividends of less than $0.02 per share are paid on the Common Stock in any fiscal quarter prior to an interest payment date, then the Company may pay one-half of the interest payable on such date in cash, and the remaining one-half of the interest otherwise payable will be added to the principal amount of the convertible note then outstanding; and (ii) if no dividends are paid on the Common Stock in the fiscal quarter prior to an interest payment date, then the Company may make no payment in cash of the interest payable on such date, and all of the interest otherwise payable on such date will be added to the principal amount of the note then outstanding. Any increase in the principal balance as a result of this provision will increase the total shares that would be issued if the holder exercises their conversion option in full. 

 

Upon the closing of the transactions, Mr. DiMaio and Christopher Ricciardi, a partner in the adviser to Mead Park Capital and the former President of the Company, will join the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. DiMaio will be named Chairman, and Mr. Cohen will be named Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Company’s Board of Directors will be reduced from ten to eight members. 

 

In addition, Mr. Cohen will transition to President of the Company’s European operations. The Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently searching for a successor to Mr. Cohen as Chief Executive Officer. Until a successor is appointed, Mr. Cohen will remain as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  In June 2013, the Company appointed Lester Brafman as President of the Company.

   

5. RECEIVABLES FROM AND PAYABLES TO BROKERS, DEALERS, AND CLEARING AGENCIES

Amounts receivable from brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies consisted of the following at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

 

 

Receivable from clearing organizations represents un-invested cash held by the clearing organization, which includes cash proceeds from short sales.

Amounts payable to brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies consisted of the following at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

 

Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date, as if they had settled. The related amounts receivable and payable for unsettled securities transactions are recorded net in receivables from or payables to brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company incurred interest on margin payable of $519 and $831 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $222 and $415 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 

---

 

6. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Investments—Trading

The following table provides detail of the investments classified as investments-trading as of the periods indicated:

 

(1)    Includes TBAs. See note 8.

(2)    Primarily comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS. 

 

Trading Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased

The following table provides detail of the trading securities sold, not yet purchased as of the periods indicated:

 

 

(1)    Represents TBAs. See note 8.

The Company tries to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates for the interest rate sensitive securities it holds by entering into offsetting short positions for similar fixed rate securities.

The Company included the change in unrealized losses in the amount of $168 and $432 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, in net trading revenue in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

---

 

Other Investments, at fair value

The following table provides detail of the investments included within other investments, at fair value:

 

 

 

 

(1)            Represents an interest in a CDO.

 

7. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Fair Value Option

The Company has elected to account for certain of its other financial assets at fair value under the fair value option provisions of FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments (“FASB ASC 825”). The primary reason for electing the fair value option when it first became available in 2008, was to reduce the burden of monitoring the differences between the cost and the fair value of the Company’s investments, previously classified as available for sale securities, including the assessment as to whether the declines are temporary in nature and to further remove an element of management judgment. In addition, the election was made for certain investments that were previously required to be accounted for under the equity method because their fair value measurements were readily obtainable.

Such financial assets accounted for at fair value include:

•      in general, securities that would otherwise qualify for available for sale treatment;

---

 

•       in general, investments in equity method affiliates where the affiliate has all of the attributes in FASB ASC 946-10-15-2 (commonly referred to as investment companies); and

•       in general, investments in residential loans.

The changes in fair value (realized and unrealized gains and losses) of these instruments for which the Company has elected the fair value option are recorded in principal transactions and other income in the consolidated statements of operations. All of the investments for which the Company has elected the fair value option are included as a component of other investments, at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized net losses of $9,993 and $5,208 related to changes in fair value of investments that are included as a component of other investments, at fair value during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company recognized net losses of $4,595 and $34 related to changes in fair value of investments that are included as a component of other investments, at fair value during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“FASB ASC 820”), the Company has categorized its financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three level fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are described below:

Level  1          Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level  2          Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on one or more of the following:

1.  Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;

2.  Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets;

 

3.  Pricing models whose inputs, other than quoted prices, are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or      liability; or

4.  Pricing models whose inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data through      correlation or other means for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level  3          Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. These inputs reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that the Company has classified within the level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the level 3 category presented in the tables below may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities) inputs.

A review of the fair value hierarchy classifications is conducted on a quarterly basis. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain financial assets or liabilities. There were no transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Reclassifications impacting level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are reported as transfers in or transfers out of the level 3 category as of the beginning of the quarter in which reclassifications occur.

---

 

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value.

 

(1)   Primarily comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS.

(2)    Hybrid Securities Fund—European.

(3)    Real Estate Fund—Asian.

(4)    Diversified Fund.

---

 

 

(1)   Primarily comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS.

(2)    Hybrid Securities Fund—European.

(3)    Real Estate Fund—Asian.

(4)    Diversified Fund.

---

 

 

The following provides a brief description of the types of financial instruments the Company holds, the methodology for estimating fair value, and the level within the hierarchy of the estimate. The discussion that follows applies regardless of whether the instrument is included in investments-trading; other investments, at fair value; or trading securities sold, not yet purchased.

U.S. Government Agency MBS and CMOs: These are securities that are generally traded over-the-counter. The Company generally values these securities using third party quotations such as unadjusted broker-dealer quoted prices or market price quotations from third party pricing services. These valuations are based on a market approach. This is considered a level 2 valuation in the hierarchy.

U.S. Government Agency Debt Securities: Callable and non-callable U.S. government agency debt securities are measured primarily based on quoted market prices obtained from third party pricing services. Non-callable U.S. government agency debt securities are generally classified within level 1 and callable U.S. government agency debt securities are classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

RMBS and CMBS: The Company generally values these securities using third party quotations such as unadjusted broker-dealer quoted prices or market price quotations from third party pricing services. These valuations are based on a market approach. The Company generally classifies the fair value of these securities based on third party quotations within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

U.S. Treasury Securities:  U.S. Treasury securities include U.S. Treasury bonds and notes and the fair values of the U.S. Treasury securities are based on quoted prices in active markets. Valuation adjustments are not applied. The Company classifies the fair value of these securities within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

Interests in Securitizations: Interests in securitizations may be comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS, which may include, but are not limited to, securities backed by auto loans, credit card receivables, or student loans. Where the Company is able to obtain independent market quotations from at least two broker-dealers and where a price within the range of at least two broker-dealers is used or market price quotations from third party pricing services is used, interests in securitizations will generally be classified as level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. These valuations are based on a market approach. The independent market quotations from broker-dealers are generally nonbinding. The Company seeks quotations from broker-dealers that historically have actively traded, monitored, issued, and been knowledgeable about interests in securitizations. The Company generally believes that to the extent that (1) it receives two quotations in a similar range from broker-dealers knowledgeable about interests in securitizations, and (2) the Company believes the broker-dealers gather and utilize observable market information such as new issue activity in the primary market, trading activity in the secondary market, credit spreads versus historical levels, bid-ask spreads, and price consensus among market participants and sources, then classification as level 2 of the valuation hierarchy is appropriate. In the absence of two broker-dealer market quotations, a single broker-dealer market quotation may be used without corroboration of the quote in which case the Company generally classifies the fair value within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

 

If quotations are unavailable, prices observed by the Company for recently executed market transactions may be used or valuation models prepared by the Company’s management may be used, which are based on an income approach. These models prepared by the Company’s management include estimates and the valuations derived from them could differ materially from amounts realizable in an open market exchange. Fair values based on internal valuation models prepared by the Company’s management are generally classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Establishing fair value is inherently subjective given the volatile and sometimes illiquid markets for certain interests in securitizations and requires management to make a number of assumptions, including assumptions about the future of interest rates, discount rates; and the timing of cash flows. The assumptions the Company applies are specific to each security. Although the Company may rely on internal calculations to compute the fair value of certain interest in securitizations, the Company requests and considers indications of fair value from third party pricing services to assist in the valuation process.

SBA Loans: The Company generally values these securities using third party quotations such as unadjusted broker-dealer quoted prices, internal valuation models using observable inputs, or market price quotations from third party pricing services. The Company generally classifies these investments within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. These valuations are based on a market approach.

Corporate Bonds, Redeemable Preferred Stock, and Foreign Government Bonds: The Company uses recently executed transactions or third party quotations from independent pricing services to arrive at the fair value of its investments in corporate bonds, redeemable preferred stock, and foreign government bonds. These valuations are based on a market approach. The Company generally classifies the fair value of these bonds within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In instances where the fair values of securities are based on quoted prices in active markets (for example with redeemable preferred stock), the Company classifies the fair value of these securities within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

---

 

Municipal Bonds: Municipal bonds, which include obligations of U.S. states, municipalities, and political subdivisions, primarily include bonds or notes issued by U.S. municipalities. The Company generally values these securities using third party quotations such as market price quotations from third party pricing services. The Company generally classifies the fair value of these bonds within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The valuations are based on a market approach. In instances where the Company is unable to obtain reliable market price quotations from third party pricing services, the Company will use its own internal valuation models. In these cases, the Company will classify such securities as level 3 within the hierarchy until it is able to obtain third party pricing.

Exchange Traded Funds: Exchange traded funds are investment funds that trade in active markets, similar to public company stocks. The fair values of exchange traded funds are based on quoted prices in active markets. Valuation adjustments are not applied. The Company classifies the fair value of these securities within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

Equity Securities : The fair value of equity securities that represent investments in publicly traded companies (common or preferred shares, options, warrants, and other equity investments) are determined using the closing price of the security as of the reporting date. These are securities which are traded on a recognized liquid exchange. This is considered a level 1 value in the valuation hierarchy.

In some cases, the Company has owned options or warrants in newly publicly traded companies when the option or warrant itself is not publicly traded. In those cases, the Company used an internal valuation model and classified the investment within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The non-exchange traded equity options and warrants were measured using the Black-Scholes model with key inputs impacting the valuation including the underlying security price, implied volatility, dividend yield, interest rate curve, strike price, and maturity date. Once the securities underlying the options or warrants (not the options or warrants themselves) have quoted prices available in an active market, the Company attributes a value to the warrants using the Black-Scholes model based on the respective price of the options or warrants and the quoted prices of the securities underlying the options or warrants and key observable inputs. In this case, the Company will generally classify the options or warrants as level 2 within the valuation hierarchy because the inputs to the valuation model are now observable. If the option or warrant itself begins to trade on a liquid exchange, the Company will discontinue using a valuation model and will begin to use the public exchange price at which point it will be classified as level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.

Other equity securities represent investments in investment funds and other non-publicly traded entities. Substantially all of these other entities have the attributes of investment companies as described in FASB ASC 946-15-2. The Company estimates the fair value of these entities using the reported net asset value per share as of the reporting date in accordance with the “practical expedient” provisions related to investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent) included in FASB ASC 820 for all entities except Star Asia. The Company generally classifies these estimates within either level 2 of the valuation hierarchy if its investment in the entity is currently redeemable or level 3 if its investment is not currently redeemable.

Prior to the second quarter of 2013, the Company carried its investment in Tiptree based on the underlying net asset value per share of the fund in accordance with the “practical expedient” provisions discussed above and the Company classified the fair value estimate within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.  Beginning with the second quarter of 2013, the Company changed the way it calculates the fair value of its investment in Tiptree.  During the second quarter of 2013, Tiptree completed a reorganization. As a result of that reorganization, the Company’s investment in Tiptree can be exchanged into shares of Tiptree Financial, Inc. based on a stated exchange ratio (which is generally fixed, but can be adjusted for certain events, such as stock dividends or stock splits).  Tiptree Financial, Inc. is publicly traded over the counter.  Therefore, beginning with the second quarter of 2013, the Company has calculated the fair value of its investment in Tiptree by using the closing over the counter price for Tiptree Financial, Inc. and adjusting for the exchange ratio.  Based on this pricing methodology, the Company began classifying the fair value of its investment in Tiptree as level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

 

In the case of Star Asia, the Company utilizes a valuation model to determine fair value, which uses a market approach and generally classifies its investment within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Star Asia accounts for itself as an investment company as described in ASC 946, Financial Services—Investment Companies. As an investment company, Star Asia carries its assets at fair value and reports net asset value (“NAV”) per share to its investors. However, Star Asia issued subordinated debt securities in 2009 at a significant discount to par. Upon issuance, Star Asia did not elect the fair value option for these liabilities and was not required to do so under ASC 946. Over time, it is the Company’s assessment that the fair value of the subordinated debt securities has diverged from its carrying value. Because Star Asia’s published NAV is calculated using the amortized cost of these subordinated debt securities, the Company has concluded it would be appropriate to adjust Star Asia’s reported NAV to recalculate it as if Star Asia’s subordinated debt were recorded at fair value as opposed to its historical amortized cost. The Company estimates the fair value of Star Asia’s subordinated debt securities by projecting the remaining debt cash outflows and discounting them at an estimated market rate as of the reporting date, which is derived from similar non-investment grade long term subordinated debt issuances.

The Company used discount rates of 6.82% and 7.32% as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively, in determining the fair value of Star Asia’s subordinated debt securities. If the Company had used Star Asia’s unadjusted NAV, rather than the

---

 

Company’s financial model described above in determining the fair value of the Company’s investment in Star Asia, the Company would have recorded its investment in Star Asia at a value of $39,998 and $31,267 as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively, as compared to the fair value as determined by the Company’s internal valuation model of $30,169, and $20,935 as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, respectively.

Residential Loans: Management utilizes home price indices to value the residential loans. Previously, management had considered adjustments to these indices but elected at the beginning of 2012 not to adjust the indices. Adjustments to the index implied a level 3 valuation. The methodology using an unadjusted index, which is considered an observable input, implies a level 2 valuation.

Certificates of Deposit: The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated using valuations provided by third party pricing services. Certificates of deposit are generally categorized in level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

Derivatives:

Foreign currency Forward Contracts

Foreign currency forward contracts are exchange-traded derivatives which transact on an exchange that is deemed to be active.  The fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts is based on current quoted market prices.  Valuation adjustments are not applied.  These are considered a level 1 value in the hierarchy. See note 8.

TBAs

The Company generally values these securities using third party quotations such as unadjusted broker-dealer quoted prices or market price quotations from third party pricing services. TBAs are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. If there is limited transaction activity or less transparency to observe market based inputs to valuation models, TBAs are classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. U.S. government agency MBS and CMOs include TBAs. Unrealized gains on TBAs are included in investments-trading on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and unrealized losses on TBAs are included in trading securities sold, not yet purchased on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. See note 8.

---

 

 

Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table presents additional information about assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized level 3 inputs to determine fair value.

 

 

 

(1)  Represents the change in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period.

(2)  Primarily comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS.

(3)  Hybrid Securities Funds—European.

(4)  Real Estate Funds—Asian.

(5)  Diversified Fund.

---

 

 

 

 

(1)  Represents the change in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period.

(2)  Primarily comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS.

(3)  Hybrid Securities Funds—European.

(4)  Real Estate Funds—Asian.

(5)  Diversified Fund.

---

 

 

 

 

(1) Represents the change in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period.

(2)  Primarily comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS.

(3)  Hybrid Securities Funds—European.

(4)  Real Estate Funds—Asian.

(5)  Diversified Fund.

---

 

 

 

 

 

(1)  Represents the change in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period.

(2)  Primarily comprised of CDOs, CLOs, and ABS.

(3)  Hybrid Securities Funds—European.

(4)  Real Estate Funds—Asian.

(5)  Diversified Fund.

---

 

 

The circumstances that would result in transferring certain financial instruments from level 2 to level 3 of the valuation hierarchy would typically include what the Company believes to be a decrease in the availability, utility, and reliability of observable market information such as new issue activity in the primary market, trading activity in the secondary market, credit spreads versus historical levels, bid-ask spreads, and price consensus among market participants and sources.

Investments-trading: During the six and three months ended June 30, 2013, there were no transfers into or out of level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.  During the six and three months ended June 30, 2012, there were no transfers into or out of level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. 

Other investments, at fair value: During the six and three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company transferred $2,834 of its investment in Tiptree from level 3 to level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company transferred $267 of residential loans from level 3 to level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.  During the three months ended June 30, 2012, there were no transfers into or out of level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. 

 The following table provides the quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively:

 

 

 

 

Sensitivity of Fair Value to Changes in Significant Unobservable Inputs

For recurring fair value measurements categorized within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in significant unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those unobservable inputs (if any) are described below:

•    Equity investments in investment funds and other non-publicly traded entities. 

With respect to the fair value measurement of investment funds and other non-publicly traded entities for which the Company uses the underlying net asset value per share to determine the fair value of the Company’s respective investment, a significant increase (decrease) in the net asset value per share, which is linked to the underlying financial performance of the respective entity, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

---

 

•     Equity investment in Star Asia

With respect to the Company’s investment in Star Asia for which the Company has concluded it would be appropriate to adjust Star Asia’s reported NAV to recalculate it as if Star Asia’s subordinated debt were recorded at fair value as opposed to its historical cost. The Company estimates the fair value of Star Asia’s subordinated debt securities by projecting the remaining debt cash outflows and discounting them at an estimated market discount rate. Any change in the discount rate used in this calculation, which is linked to market yields for similar non-investment grade long term subordinated debt issuances, may result in a significant higher (lower) fair value measurement.

Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value Per Share (Or Its Equivalent)

The following table presents additional information about investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (regardless of whether the “practical expedient” provisions of FASB ASC 820 have been applied) which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

 

 

N/A – Not applicable.

(a)    EuroDekania’s investment strategy is to make investments in hybrid capital securities that have attributes of debt and equity, primarily in the form of subordinated debt issued by insurance companies, banks and bank holding companies based primarily in Western Europe; widely syndicated leveraged loans issued by European corporations; CMBS, including subordinated interests in first mortgage real estate loans; and RMBS and other ABS backed by consumer and commercial receivables. The majority of the assets are denominated in Euros and U.K. Pounds Sterling. The fair value of the investment in this category has been estimated using the net asset value per share of the investment in accordance with the “practical expedient” provisions of FASB ASC 820.

(b)    Star Asia’s investment strategy is to make investments in Asian real estate structured finance investments, including CMBS, corporate debt of REITs and real estate operating companies, whole loans, mezzanine loans, and other commercial real estate fixed income investments. The fair value of the investment in this category has been estimated using an internal valuation model that uses a market approach. If the Company had used Star Asia’s unadjusted reported net asset value to determine its fair value, the carrying value of its investment in Star Asia would have been $31,267 as of June 30, 2013 and $39,998 as of December 31, 2012.

---

 

(c)     The investment strategy of Tiptree is focused on investing in (a) specialty finance companies; (b) alternative asset management companies; and (c) diversified credit assets and related equity interests. Tiptree primarily seeks to acquire majority ownership interests in its investees. Prior to June 30, 2013, the fair value of this investment had been estimated using the net asset value per share of the investment in accordance with the “practical expedient” provisions of FASB ASC 820. Beginning with the second quarter of 2013, the Company calculates the fair value of its investment in Tiptree by using the closing over the counter price for Tiptree Financial, Inc. and adjusting for the exchange ratio.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company owned approximately 1% of Tiptree.  

 

(d)                The Star Asia Special Situations Fund’s investment strategy is to make investments in real estate and securities backed by real estate in Japan. The Star Asia Special Situations Fund is a closed end fund that does not allow investor redemptions. It has an initial life of three years which can be extended under certain circumstances for up to two years. The fair value of the investment in this category has been estimated using the net asset value per share of the investment in accordance with the “practical expedient” provisions of FASB ASC 820. The Company’s unfunded commitment was denominated in Japanese Yen and fluctuated based on the foreign exchange spot rate used at any particular period. See note 20.

   

8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“FASB ASC 815”), provides for optional hedge accounting. When a derivative is deemed to be a hedge and certain documentation and effectiveness testing requirements are met, reporting entities are allowed to record all or a portion of the change in the fair value of a designated hedge as an adjustment to other comprehensive income (“OCI”) rather than as a gain or loss in the statements of operations. To date, the Company has not designated any derivatives as hedges under the provisions included in FASB ASC 815.

Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value. If the derivative was entered into as part of the Company’s broker-dealer operations, it will be included as a component of investments-trading or trading securities sold, not yet purchased. If it is entered into as an economic hedge for another financial instrument included in other investments, at fair value then the derivative will be included as a component of other investments, at fair value. The Company may, from time to time, enter into derivatives to manage its risk exposures (i) arising from fluctuations in foreign currency rates with respect to the Company’s investments in foreign currency denominated investments; (ii) arising from the Company’s investments in interest rate sensitive investments; and (iii) arising from the Company’s facilitation of mortgage-backed trading. Derivatives entered into by the Company, from time to time, may include (i) foreign currency forward contracts; (ii) EuroDollar futures; and (iii) purchase and sale agreements of TBAs. TBAs are forward mortgage-backed securities whose collateral remain “to be announced” until just prior to the trade settlement. TBAs are accounted for as derivatives under FASB ASC 815 when either of the following conditions exists: (i) when settlement of the TBA trade is not expected to occur at the next regular settlement date (which is typically the next month) or (ii) a mechanism exists to settle the contract on a net basis. Otherwise, TBAs are recorded as a standard security trade. The settlement of these transactions is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Derivatives involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk, whereby changes in the level or volatility of interest rates or market values of the underlying financial instruments may result in changes in the value of a particular financial instrument in excess of its carrying amount. Depending on the Company’s investment strategy, realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in principal transactions and other income or in net trading in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations on a trade date basis.

The Company may, from time to time, enter into the following derivative instruments:

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The Company invests in foreign currency denominated investments that expose it to fluctuations in foreign currency rates, and, therefore, the Company may, from time to time, hedge such exposure by using foreign currency forward contracts.  The Company carries the foreign currency forward contracts at fair value and includes them as a component of other investments, at fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts with a notional amount of 1.25 billion Japanese Yen. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts.

TBAs

The Company trades U.S. government agency obligations. In connection with these activities, the Company may be required to maintain inventory in order to facilitate customer transactions. In order to mitigate exposure to market risk, the Company enters in to the purchase and sale of TBAs. The Company carries the TBAs at fair value and includes them as a component of investments—trading or trading securities sold, not yet purchased in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2013, the Company had open TBA sale agreements in the notional amount of $92,010 and open TBA purchase agreements in the notional amount of

---

 

$82,088. At December 31, 2012, the Company had open TBA sale agreements in the notional amount of $40,125 and open TBA purchase agreements in the notional amount of $32,794. 

 

The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments and the amount and location of the fair value (unrealized gain / (loss)) recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

 

The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments and the amount and location of the net gain (loss) recognized in the consolidated statement of operations:

 

 

 

 

In addition to the above activities related to TBAs, the Company also enters into TBAs in order to assist clients (generally small to mid-size mortgage loan originators) in hedging the interest rate risk associated with the mortgages owned by the clients. In general, the Company will enter into a TBA purchase agreement with the client. Then, the Company will immediately enter into a TBA sale agreement with identical terms and settlement date with a separate counterparty. The Company seeks to profit through a small mark-up in the price of the transaction. The TBAs will match underlying terms and settlement dates. Because the Company has purchased and sold the same security, it is no longer exposed to market movements of the underlying TBA. The gain or loss on the transaction is recorded as a component of net trading in the consolidated statement of operations and is included in due to or due from broker in the consolidated balance sheet until it settles. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had unsettled TBA purchase contracts and offsetting

---

 

TBA sale agreements in the notional amount of $365,800. The net profit on these transactions is recorded as a component of net trading revenue and is included as a component of TBA revenue in the table above. Any revenue on trades that have not yet settled is included as a component of due to or due from brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies.

   

9. COLLATERALIZED SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS

Securities purchased under agreements to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements” or “receivables under resale agreements”) or sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”), principally U.S. government and federal agency obligations and MBS, are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at their contracted resale or repurchase amounts plus accrued interest. The resulting interest income and expense are included in net trading in the consolidated statements of operations.

In the case of reverse repurchase agreements, the Company generally takes possession of securities as collateral. Likewise, in the case of repurchase agreements, the Company is required to provide the counterparty with securities.

In certain cases a repurchase agreement and a reverse repurchase agreement may be entered into with the same counterparty. If certain requirements are met, the offsetting provisions included in FASB ASC 210, Balance Sheet (“FASB ASC 210”), allow (but do not require) the reporting entity to net the asset and liability on the balance sheet. It is the Company’s policy to present the assets and liabilities on a gross basis even if the conditions described in offsetting provisions included in FASB ASC 210 are met. The primary requirement to present assets and liabilities on a net basis is to have a master netting agreement with the counterparty. Because the Company does not generally enter into repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements with the same counterparties, it does not have master netting agreements in place.

The Company classifies reverse repurchase agreements as a separate line item within the assets section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company classifies repurchase agreements as a separate line item within the liabilities section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

In the case of reverse repurchase agreements, if the counterparty does not meet its contractual obligation to return securities used as collateral, or does not deposit additional securities or cash for margin when required, the Company may be exposed to the risk of reacquiring the securities or selling the securities at unfavorable market prices in order to satisfy its obligations to its customers or counterparties. The Company’s policy to control this risk is monitoring the market value of securities pledged or used as collateral on a daily basis and requiring adjustments in the event of excess market exposure.

In the case of repurchase agreements, if the counterparty makes a margin call and the Company is unable or unwilling to meet the margin call, the counterparty can sell the securities to repay the obligation. The Company is at risk that the counterparty may sell the securities at unfavorable market prices and the Company may sustain significant loss. The Company controls this risk by monitoring its liquidity position to ensure it has sufficient cash or liquid securities to meet margin calls.

 

In the normal course of doing business, the Company enters into reverse repurchase agreements that permit it to re-pledge or resell the securities to others.

The Company enters into reverse repurchase agreements to acquire securities to cover short positions or as an investment. The Company enters into repurchase agreements to finance the Company’s securities positions held in inventory or to finance reverse repurchase agreements entered into as an investment.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company held reverse repurchase agreements of $101,444 and $70,110, respectively, and the fair value of securities received as collateral under reverse repurchase agreements was $101,793 and $73,382, respectively.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had repurchase agreements of $103,443 and $70,273, respectively, and the fair value of securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements was $103,619 and $73,382, respectively. These amounts include collateral for reverse repurchase agreements that were re-pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements.

 

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements were predominantly collateralized securities in the following asset classes: Agency Specified Pools, Agency Hybrid Arms, and Fixed Rate Agency CMOs.

   

---

 

10. OTHER ASSETS AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND OTHER LIABILITIES

Other assets included:

 

 

Accounts payable and other liabilities included:

 

 

 

See note 13 regarding mandatorily redeemable equity interests. See note 26 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 regarding the settlement payable.

   

11. INVESTMENTS IN EQUITY METHOD AFFILIATES

The Company has several investments that are accounted for under the equity method. Equity method accounting requires that the Company record its investment on the consolidated balance sheets and recognize its share of the affiliate’s net income as earnings each year. Investment in equity method affiliates is included as a component of other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

---

 

 

The Company has certain equity method affiliates for which it has elected the fair value option. Those investees are excluded from the table below. Those investees are included as a component of other investments, at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets. All gains and losses (unrealized and realized) from securities classified as other investments, at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are recorded as a component of principal transactions and other income in the consolidated statements of operations.

Effective in March 2013, the Company acquired 100% control of Star Asia Manager as a result of the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction. See note 4. Prior to March 1, 2013, the Company accounted for its investment in Star Asia Manager under the equity method. Since March 1, 2013, the Company has included Star Asia Manager in its consolidated financial statements.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had the following equity method investees (excluding equity method affiliates for which it had adopted the fair value option): (i) Deep Value GP; (ii) Deep Value GP II; (iii) Star Asia Opportunity; (iv) Star Asia Capital Management; (v) SAA Manager; and (vi) SAP GP. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company did not make an investment in SAP GP or recognize any income or loss under the equity method related to SAP GP. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company received its investment return up to an agreed upon maximum from Star Asia SPV and the Company no longer has an ownership interest in Star Asia SPV. The following table summarizes the activity and the earnings of the Company’s equity method affiliates and includes the activity for Star Asia Manager during the period that the Company accounted for its investment in Star Asia Manager under the equity method.

 

 

(1)   See note 4.

The following table summarizes the combined financial information for all equity method investees, including equity method investees for which the fair value option was elected. This aggregated summarized financial data does not represent the Company’s proportionate share of equity method investees’ assets or earnings.

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

See note 20 for information regarding transactions with the Company’s equity method investees.

12. DEBT

The Company had the following debt outstanding:

 

 

 

(1)   Represents the holder’s earliest put date and the Company’s earliest redemption date. The contractual maturity for the New Notes is May 2027.

The Company may redeem all or part of the $8,121 aggregate principal amount of the New Notes for cash on or after May 20, 2014, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the New Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date. The holders of the New Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the New Notes for cash on May 15, 2014; May 15, 2017; and May 15, 2022 for a repurchase price equal to the principal amount of the New Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date. The holders of the New Notes are required to provide notice to the Company of their plan to redeem the New Notes at any time during the 30 days prior to May 15, 2014; May 15, 2017; and May 15, 2022.

---

 

(2)    The outstanding par represents the total par amount of the junior subordinated notes held by two separate VIE trusts. The Company does not consolidate these trusts. The Company holds $1,489 par value of these junior subordinated notes, comprised of $870 par value of junior subordinated notes related to Alesco Capital Trust I and $619 par value of junior subordinated notes related to Sunset Financial Statutory Trust I. These notes have a carrying value of $0. Therefore, the net par value held by third parties is $48,125.

(3)    Comprised of 9% paid currently and 3% paid in kind.  The subordinated note payable was fully repaid in June 2013. 

(4)    The Star Asia Manager note payable has no stated maturity date. See description of payment terms below.

(5)    Represents the interest rate as of the last day of the reporting period. 

Refer to note 17 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended, for a discussion of the Company’s debt.

 

In connection with the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction in March 2013, Star Asia Manager had paid cash of $425 and issued to Mercury a note payable in the principal amount of $725. See notes 4 and 11. Under the note payable, interest accrues on the unpaid balance of the principal amount at a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum. Payments will be made quarterly in an amount equal to 50% of cash available for distribution as defined in the note payable agreement. The Star Asia Manager note payable is pre-payable without penalty and has no stated maturity date.

 

In June 2013, the Company repaid in full the subordinated notes payable to an unrelated third party for a total of $352, including principal of $347 and cash and accrued paid in kind interest of $5.

   

13. REDEEMABLE NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST (TEMPORARY EQUITY) AND MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE EQUITY INTERESTS

Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest

The redeemable non-controlling interest represents the equity interests of PrinceRidge that are not owned by the Company. The members of PrinceRidge have the right to withdraw from PrinceRidge and require PrinceRidge to redeem the interests for cash over a contractual payment period. The Company accounts for these interests as temporary equity under Accounting Series Release 268 (“ASR 268”). These interests are shown outside of the permanent equity of IFMI in its consolidated balance sheet as redeemable non-controlling interests.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company reclassified $6,071 from redeemable non-controlling interest to mandatorily redeemable equity interests on its consolidated balance sheets due to partnership withdrawals from PrinceRidge. In addition, PrinceRidge purchased $43 of non-controlling interest for cash during the six months ended June 30, 2012 from an existing partner and received $20 in cash related to capital contributions made to PrinceRidge during the second quarter of 2012.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company purchased $317 of non-controlling interest for cash from existing partners.

Mandatorily Redeemable Equity Interests

Per the terms of the operating agreement, PrinceRidge must redeem a withdrawing partner’s equity interests over a period of time of up to two to five years. The amount actually due to a withdrawing partner will fluctuate over time based on the operating results of PrinceRidge. The carrying value of the liability owed to a withdrawing partner will be recorded at the amount owed as of each balance sheet date. Any increases or decreases in the amount owed will be recorded as interest income or expense and will be included in the non-operating section of the consolidated statement of operations.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company distributed cash of $86 and $789, respectively, to the holders of mandatorily redeemable equity interests.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the mandatorily redeemable equity interests totaled $0 and $86, respectively. See note 10.

---

 

14. PERMANENT EQUITY

Stockholders’ Equity

Common Equity: The following table reflects the activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013 related to the number of shares of unrestricted common stock that the Company had issued as of June 30, 2013:

 

 

In connection with the acquisition of JVB Holdings in January 2011, the Company issued 559,020 restricted units of the Operating LLC to certain of the former owners of JVB Holdings who remained employees of JVB Holdings. As of December 31, 2012, there were 372,681 restricted units outstanding. These units vest over a three year period (of which two of the three years have elapsed) and are treated as compensation for future service. In January 2013, 186,339 restricted units of the Operating LLC vested, and the holders of these vested Operating LLC membership units elected to redeem these units. The Company, at its discretion, issued 186,339 shares of IFMI common stock to the JVB Holdings sellers in exchange for these vested membership units. As of June 30, 2013, there were 186,342 restricted units outstanding.

Acquisition and Surrender of Additional Units of the Operating LLC, net: Effective January 1, 2011, IFMI and the Operating LLC entered into a Unit Issuance and Surrender Agreement (the “UIS Agreement”) which was approved by IFMI’s Board of Directors and the board of managers of the Operating LLC. In an effort to maintain a 1:1 ratio of IFMI’s common stock to the number of membership units IFMI holds in the Operating LLC, the UIS Agreement calls for the issuance of additional membership units of the Operating LLC to IFMI when IFMI issues its common stock to employees under existing equity compensation plans. In certain cases, the UIS Agreement calls for IFMI to surrender units to the Operating LLC when certain restricted shares are forfeited by the employee or repurchased.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, IFMI received units of the Operating LLC. The following table displays the amount of units received (net of surrenders) by IFMI pursuant to the UIS Agreement and as a result of the vesting and redemption of membership units of the Operating LLC by certain former owners of JVB Holdings for IFMI common stock as discussed above.

 

 

 

The Company recognized a net increase in additional paid in capital of $634 and a net decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $25 with an offsetting decrease in non-controlling interest of $609 in connection with the acquisition and surrender of additional units of the Operating LLC. The following schedule presents the effects of changes in IFMI’s ownership interest in the Operating LLC on the equity attributable to IFMI for the six months ended:

 

 

 

 

---

 

15 . NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

The U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries of the Company are subject to the net capital provision of Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital, as defined therein. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had the following two U.S. broker-dealers: JVB and CCPR.

As of June 30, 2013, JVB’s adjusted net capital was $8,612, which exceeded the minimum requirements by $8,497. As of June 30, 2013, CCPR had net capital of $10,628, which exceeded the minimum requirements by $10,378.  

CCFL, a subsidiary of the Company regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (formerly known as the Financial Services Authority) in the United Kingdom, is subject to the net liquid capital provision of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, GENPRU 2.140R to 2.1.57R, relating to financial prudence with regards to the European Investment Services Directive and the European Capital Adequacy Directive, which requires the maintenance of minimum liquid capital, as defined therein. As of June 30, 2013, the total minimum required net liquid capital was $2,457, and net liquid capital in CCFL was $4,414, which exceeded the minimum requirements by $1,957 and was in compliance with the net liquid capital provisions.

   

16 . EARNINGS / (Loss) PER COMMON SHARE

The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings / (loss) per common share for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

(1)     The Operating LLC membership units not held by IFMI (that is, those held by the non-controlling interest for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012) may be redeemed and exchanged into shares of the Company on a one-to-one basis. The 4,983,557 Operating LLC membership units held by Mr. Daniel G. Cohen are redeemable at Mr. Cohen’s option, at any time on or after January 1, 2014, for (i) cash in an amount equal to the average of the per share closing prices of the Company’s Common Stock for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date the Company receives Mr. Cohen’s redemption notice, or (ii) at the Company’s option, one share of the Company’s Common Stock, subject, in each case, to appropriate adjustment upon the occurrence of an issuance of additional shares of the Company’ Common Stock as a dividend or other distribution on the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, or a further subdivision or combination of the outstanding

---

 

shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Operating LLC membership units held by other members of the Operating LLC have the same redemption rights as described above except that the members holding these units may elect to redeem their shares at any time. These units are not included in the computation of basic earnings per share. These units enter into the computation of diluted net income / (loss) per common share when the effect is dilutive using the if-converted method.

(2)     An adjustment is included for the following: (i) if the Operating LLC membership units had been converted at the beginning of the period, the Company would have incurred a higher income tax expense or realized a higher income tax benefit, as applicable; and (ii) to adjust the non-controlling interest amount to be consistent with the weighted average share calculation.

(3)     For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, weighted average common shares outstanding excludes a total of 344,834 and 31,594 shares, respectively, representing restricted Operating LLC units, restricted IFMI Common Stock, and restricted units of IFMI Common stock.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, weighted average common shares outstanding excludes a total of 371,778 and 21,879 shares, respectively, representing restricted Operating LLC units, restricted IFMI Common Stock, and restricted units of IFMI Common stock. 

   

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal and Regulatory Proceedings

The Company was named in litigation commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on June 29, 2012, under the caption U.S. Bank National Association v. Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. The plaintiff, U.S. Bank, alleges breach of contract respecting certain fees allegedly owing to U.S. Bank, as Trustee, in connection with the issuance of trust preferred securities, seeking damages and a declaration that the Company must make certain future fee payments. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in lieu of an answer on October 26, 2012. U.S. Bank filed its response to the motion on November 26, 2012. On July 19, 2013, the court entered a Memorandum and Order denying the Company’s motion to dismiss.  The Company has until August 19, 2013, to file an answer to the Complaint.  The Company intends to defend the action vigorously. The ultimate amount of any loss incurred by the Company in this matter is uncertain. The Company cannot currently estimate the likelihood it will suffer a loss greater than the amounts accrued for as of June 30, 2013. 

In addition to the matters set forth above, the Company is a party to various routine legal proceedings and regulatory inquiries arising out of the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Management believes that the results of these routine legal proceedings and regulatory matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, or on the Company’s operations and cash flows. However, the Company cannot estimate the legal fees and expenses to be incurred in connection with these routine matters and, therefore, is unable to determine whether these future legal fees and expenses will have a material impact on the Company’s operations and cash flows. It is the Company’s policy to expense legal and other fees as incurred.

 

Alesco XIV Guarantee

AFN invested in a CDO (Alesco XIV) in which Assured Guaranty (“Assured”) was providing credit support to the senior interests in securitizations. Alesco XIV made a loan (the “Guaranteed Loan”) to a particular borrower and AFN entered into an arrangement with Assured whereby AFN agreed to make payments to Assured upon the occurrence of both (i) a loss on the Guaranteed Loan and (ii) a loss suffered by Assured on its overall credit support arrangement to Alesco XIV security holders. This arrangement was accounted for as a guarantee by the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had a liability of $1,084 related to this arrangement that was included in accounts payable and other liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. In May 2013, the underlying loan was paid off in full by the borrower. As a result, the Company’s guarantee with Assured was extinguished. For the six and three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized other income of $1,084, which was included as a component of principal transactions and other income in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, and wrote off the liability.

Accumulated Dividends and Dividend Equivalents on Restricted Stock and Restricted Units

From time to time, the Company has granted restricted stock and restricted units that are entitled to receive dividends or dividend equivalents as and when such dividends or dividend equivalents are declared and paid by the Company; provided, however, that the cash dividends or dividend equivalents on such restricted stock or restricted units are held by the Company until the period of forfeiture lapses and forfeited if the underlying restricted shares or restricted units are forfeited. The Company’s potential liability, assuming the restricted stock or restricted units were to vest as of June 30, 2013, is approximately $105.

 

---

 

18. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Segment Information

The Company operates within three business segments: Capital Markets, Asset Management, and Principal Investing. See note 1.

The Company’s business segment information for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 was prepared using the following methodologies and generally represents the information that is relied upon by management in its decision making processes:

(a) Revenues and expenses directly associated with each business segment are included in determining net income / (loss) by segment.

(b) Indirect expenses (such as general and administrative expenses including executive and indirect overhead costs) not directly associated with specific business segments are not allocated to the business segments’ statements of operations. Accordingly, the Company presents segment information consistent with internal management reporting. See note (1) in the table below for more detail on unallocated items. The following tables present the financial information for the Company’s segments for the periods indicated.

Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company reclassified the investment in certain equity method affiliates as well as the income / (loss) from these equity method affiliates from the Principal Investing business segment to the Asset Management business segment. Relevant prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

(1)   Unallocated includes certain expenses incurred by indirect overhead and support departments (such as the executive, finance, legal, information technology, human resources, risk, compliance, and other similar overhead and support departments). Some of the items not allocated include: (1) operating expenses (such as cash compensation and benefits, equity-based compensation expense, professional fees, travel and entertainment, consulting fees, and rent) related to support departments excluding certain departments that directly support the Capital Markets business segment; (2) interest expense on corporate debt; and (3) income taxes. Management does not consider these items necessary for an understanding of the operating results of these business segments and such amounts are excluded in business segment reporting to the Chief Operating Decision Maker.

---

 

 

  

 

 

(1)   Unallocated assets primarily include (1) amounts due from related parties; (2) furniture and equipment, net; and (3) other assets that are not considered necessary for an understanding of business segment assets and such amounts are excluded in business segment reporting to the Chief Operating Decision Maker.

(2)    Goodwill and intangible assets as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 are allocated to the Capital Markets and Asset Management business segments as indicated in the table from above.

Geographic Information

The Company conducts its business activities through offices in the following locations: (1) United States; (2) United Kingdom and other; and (3) Asia. Total revenues by geographic area are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

Long-lived assets attributable to an individual country, other than the United States, are not material.

   

 

---

 

19. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE

Interest paid by the Company on its debt was $1,522 and $2,721 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company paid income taxes of $281 and $111 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company received $19 and $0 income tax refunds for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company had the following significant non-cash transactions that are not reflected on the statement of cash flows:

•       The Company acquired additional units of the Operating LLC pursuant to the UIS Agreement and in connection with the redemption of vested Operating LLC units by IFMI. The Company recognized a net increase in additional paid-in capital of $634, a net decrease of $25 in accumulated other comprehensive income, and a decrease of $609 in non-controlling interest. See note 14.

•       In connection with the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction, the Company reclassified $705 from investment in equity method affiliates and re-allocated it to certain balance sheet accounts to reflect Star Asia Manager becoming a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. See note 4.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had the following significant non-cash transactions that are not reflected on the statement of cash flows:

 

•       The Company recognized a net increase in additional paid-in capital of $828, a net decrease of $28 in accumulated other comprehensive income, and a decrease of $800 in non-controlling interest as a result of additional units of the Operating LLC issued to IFMI as a result of the UIS agreement and redemption of vested Operating LLC units by IFMI.

 

•       The Company reclassified $6,071 from redeemable non-controlling interest to mandatorily redeemable equity interests in its consolidated balance sheets due to partnership withdrawals from PrinceRidge.

   

20 . RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has identified the following related party transactions for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The transactions are listed by related party and, unless otherwise noted in the text of the description, the amounts are disclosed in the tables at the end of this section.

A. Transactions between Star Asia Manager and the Company

Star Asia Manager serves as external manager of Star Asia and Star Asia SPV (see D-1 and D-4 listed below) and the Company owned 50% of Star Asia Manager prior to March 1, 2013. Following the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction, the Company acquired 100% control of Star Asia Manager and included Star Asia Manager in its consolidated financial statements. See note 4 for a description of the Star Asia Manager Repurchase Transaction. Prior to March 1, 2013, Star Asia Manager had been identified as a related party because it was an equity method investee of the Company. The Company had recognized its share of the income or loss of Star Asia Manager as income or loss from equity method affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations during the pre-acquisition period. Income or loss recognized under the equity method is disclosed in the table at the end of this section.

B. Cohen Bros. Financial, LLC (“CBF”)

CBF has been identified as a related party because (i) CBF is a non-controlling interest of the Company and (ii) CBF is wholly owned by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Beginning in October 2008, the Company began receiving a monthly advisory fee for consulting services provided by the Company to CBF. The Company stopped providing these services and stopped receiving this fee as of March 31, 2012. The fee was recognized as a component of asset management revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. This fee is disclosed as management fee revenue in the tables at the end of this section.

C. The Bancorp, Inc.

The Bancorp, Inc. (“TBBK”) is identified as a related party because TBBK’s Chairman is the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

TBBK maintained deposits for the Company in the amount of $72 and $36 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. These amounts are not disclosed in the tables at the end of this section.

---

 

As part of the Company’s broker-dealer operations, the Company from time to time purchases securities from third parties and sells those securities to TBBK. The Company may purchase securities from TBBK and ultimately sell those securities to third parties. In either of the cases listed above, the Company includes the trading revenue earned (i.e. the gain or loss realized, or commission earned) by the Company for the entire transaction in the amounts disclosed as part of net trading in the table at the end of this section.

From time to time, the Company will enter into repurchase agreements with TBBK as its counterparty.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a repurchase agreement in the amount of $40,252 with TBBK as its counterparty. This is included as a component of securities sold under agreement to repurchase in the consolidated balance sheet.  The Company incurred interest expense related to repurchase agreements with TBBK as its counterparty in the amount of $93 and $74 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, which was included as a component of net trading revenue in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.  These amounts are not disclosed in the tables at the end this section.

D. Investment Vehicles and Other

The following are identified as related parties. Amounts with respect to the transactions identified below are summarized in a table at the end of this section.

1. Star Asia invests primarily in Asian commercial real estate structured finance products, including CMBS, corporate debt of REITs and real estate operating companies, B notes, mezzanine loans and other commercial real estate fixed income investments. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company directly owned approximately 28% of Star Asia’s outstanding shares. Star Asia has been identified as a related party because in the absence of the fair value option of FASB ASC 825, Star Asia would be treated as an equity method affiliate, and because the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company is a member of Star Asia’s board of directors. The Company has an investment in Star Asia. The Company, through Star Asia Manager, has an asset management contract with Star Asia. Dividends received from the Company’s investment in Star Asia are disclosed as part of dividend income in the tables at the end of this section. Gains or losses recognized from its investment are disclosed as part of gain / (loss) in the tables at the end of this section. Amounts earned from the management contract are disclosed as part of management fee revenue in the tables at the end of this section.

2. EuroDekania invests primarily in hybrid capital securities of European bank and insurance companies, CMBS, RMBS and widely syndicated leverage loans. EuroDekania’s investments are denominated in Euros or British Pounds Sterling. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company directly owned approximately 10% of EuroDekania’s outstanding shares. EuroDekania has been identified as a related party because the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company is a member of EuroDekania’s board of directors. The Company has a management contract with and an investment in EuroDekania. Dividends received from that investment are disclosed as part of dividend income in the tables at the end of this section. Gains or losses recognized from its investment are disclosed as part of the gain / (loss) in the tables at the end of this section. Amounts earned from its management contract are disclosed as part of management fee revenue in the tables at the end of this section.

3. The Deep Value GP and Deep Value GP II served as the general partners for the Deep Value funds. The Deep Value GP and the Deep Value GP II are collectively referred to as the “Deep Value GPs.” The Company owns 50% of the Deep Value GP and 40% of the Deep Value GP II. The Deep Value GP and the Deep Value GP II have been identified as related parties because the Deep Value GPs are equity method affiliates of the Company. Income or loss recognized under the equity method is disclosed in the table at the end of this section.

4. Star Asia SPV is a Delaware limited liability company formed in 2010. It was formed to create a pool of assets that would provide collateral to investors who participated in Star Asia’s 2010 rights offering. The investors in Star Asia’s rights offering also received equity interests in Star Asia SPV. Star Asia SPV purchased certain assets from Star Asia and the equity interest holders of Star Asia SPV receive investment returns on the assets held in the Star Asia SPV up to an agreed upon maximum. Returns above that agreed upon maximum are remitted back to Star Asia. The Company directly owned approximately 31% of Star Asia SPV’s outstanding shares as of December 31, 2012. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company received its investment return up to an agreed upon maximum from Star Asia SPV and the Company no longer has an ownership interest in the entity. Star Asia SPV has been identified as a related party because it was an equity method investee of the Company. Income or loss recognized under the equity method is disclosed in the table at the end of this section.

5. Duart Capital is a Delaware limited liability company formed in 2010. The Company directly owned 20% of Duart Capital’s outstanding equity interests as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Duart Capital has been identified as a related party because it is an equity method investee of the Company. Duart Capital also serves as the investment manager of the Duart Fund, which is a specialized deep value, public equity securities fund. The Company did not elect the fair value option for its investment in Duart Capital. The Company did not recognize any income or loss under the equity method for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

---

 

6. Star Asia Opportunity is a Delaware limited liability company formed in July 2011 to partially finance the acquisition of seven real estate properties in Japan. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company directly owned approximately 28% of Star Asia Opportunity’s outstanding equity interests. Star Asia Opportunity has been identified as a related party because it is an equity method investee of the Company. The Company recognizes its share of the income or loss of Star Asia Opportunity as income or loss from equity method affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations. Income or loss recognized under the equity method is disclosed in the table at the end of this section.

7. Star Asia Capital Management serves as the external manager of Star Asia Opportunity (see D-6 listed above) and the Company owned 33% of Star Asia Capital Management as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Star Asia Capital Management has been identified as a related party because it is an equity method investee of the Company. The Company recognizes its share of the income or loss of Star Asia Capital Management as income or loss from equity method affiliates in the consolidated statements of operations. Income or loss recognized under the equity method is disclosed in the table at the end of this section.

8. The Star Asia Special Situations Fund is a closed-end investment fund that primarily invests in real estate and securities backed by real estate in Japan and does not offer investor redemptions. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company owned approximately 3% and 6%, respectively, of the Star Asia Special Situations Fund. The Star Asia Special Situations Fund has been identified as a related party because in the absence of the fair value option of FASB ASC 825, the Company’s investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund would be treated as an equity method affiliate of the Company. Dividends received from that investment are disclosed as part of dividend income in the tables at the end of this section. Gains and losses recognized from its investment are disclosed as part of gain / (loss) in the tables at the end of this section.

 

9. SAA Manager serves as the external manager of the Star Asia Special Situations Fund and the Company owned 33% of SAA Manager as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. SAA Manager has been identified as a related party because it is an equity method investee of the Company. The Company did not elect the fair value option for its investment in SAA Manager. Income or loss recognized under the equity method is disclosed in the table at the end of this section.

10. SAP GP serves as the general partner for the Star Asia Special Situations Fund and the Company owned 33% of SAP GP as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. SAP GP has been identified as a related party because it is an equity method investee of the Company. The Company did not elect the fair value option for its investment in SAP GP. Income or loss recognized under the equity method is disclosed in the table at the end of this section. Since its inception during the fourth quarter of 2012 and for the six and three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company had not made an investment or recognized any income or loss under the equity method.

The following tables display the routine intercompany transactions recognized in the statements of operations from the identified related parties that are described above.

 

 

(1) Beginning March 1, 2013, Star Asia Manager was consolidated by the Company.  Prior to that, it was treated as an equity method investment.  See note A above.

 

---

 

 

(1) Beginning March 1, 2013, Star Asia Manager was consolidated by the Company.  Prior to that, it was treated as an equity method investment.  See note A above.

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

(1) Beginning March 1, 2013, Star Asia Manager was consolidated by the Company.  Prior to that, it was treated as an equity method investment.  See note A above.

The following related party transactions are non-routine and are not included in the tables above.

E. Additional Investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company made an additional investment of $302 in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund. This investment extinguished the Company’s unfunded commitment as of December 31, 2012. See notes 6 and 7.

F. Directors and Employees

In addition to the employment agreements the Company has entered into with its Chairman and its Chief Financial Officer, the Company has entered into its standard indemnification agreement with each of its directors and executive officers.

   

---

 

 

21. DUE FROM / DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

The following table summarizes the outstanding due from / to related parties. These amounts may result from normal operating advances or from timing differences between the transactions disclosed in note 20 and final settlement of those transactions in cash. All amounts are primarily non-interest bearing.

 

 

 

(1)  Beginning March 1, 2013, Star Asia Manager was consolidated by the Company.  Prior to that, it was treated as an equity method investment. 

 

(2)   Related entities include Star Asia Capital Management and SAA Manager.

   

---

 

 

 ITEM 2.              MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. and its majority owned subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates, including fair value of financial instruments. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

All amounts in this disclosure are in thousands (except share and per share data) unless otherwise noted.

Overview

We are a financial services company specializing in credit-related fixed income investments. We were founded in 1999 as an investment firm focused on small-cap banking institutions, but have grown to provide an expanding range of capital markets, investment banking, and asset management solutions to institutional investors, corporations, and other small broker dealers. We are organized into three business segments: Capital Markets, Asset Management, and Principal Investing.

•       Capital Markets: Our Capital Markets business segment consists primarily of credit-related fixed income sales, trading, and financing, as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products, and advisory services. Our fixed income sales and trading group provides trade execution to corporate investors, institutional investors, and other smaller broker-dealers. We specialize in a variety of products, including but not limited to: corporate bonds and loans, ABS, MBS, CMBS, RMBS, CDOs, CLOs, CBOs, CMOs, municipal securities, TBAs, SBA loans, U.S. government bonds, U.S. government agency securities, brokered deposits and CDs for small banks, and hybrid capital of financial institutions including TruPS, whole loans, and other structured financial instruments. We also offer execution and brokerage services for equity products. We had offered execution and brokerage services for equity derivative products until December 31, 2012, when we sold our equity derivatives brokerage business to a newly formed entity owned by two of our former employees. See note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended. We carry out our capital market activities primarily through our subsidiaries: JVB and PrinceRidge in the United States, and CCFL in Europe.  

•      Asset Management: Our Asset Management business segment manages assets within CDOs, permanent capital vehicles, managed accounts, and investment funds (collectively, “Investment Vehicles”). A CDO is a form of secured borrowing. The borrowing is secured by different types of fixed income assets such as corporate or mortgage loans or bonds. The borrowing is in the form of a securitization, which means that the lenders are actually investing in notes backed by the assets. In the event of default, the lenders will have recourse only to the assets securing the loan. Our Asset Management business segment includes our fee-based asset management operations, which include on-going base and incentive management fees. As of June 30, 2013, we had approximately $6.2 billion in AUM of which 95%, or $5.9 billion, was in CDOs.

•       Principal Investing: Our Principal Investing business segment is comprised primarily of our investments in Investment Vehicles we manage, as well as investments in structured products, and the related gains and losses that they generate.

We generate our revenue by business segment primarily through:

Capital Markets:

•      our trading activities, which include execution and brokerage services, securities lending activities, riskless trading activities, as well as gains and losses (unrealized and realized) and income and expense earned on securities classified as trading; and

•      new issue and advisory revenue comprised of (a) origination fees for corporate debt issues originated by us; (b) revenue from advisory services; and (c) new issue revenue associated with arranging and placing the issuance of newly created debt, equity, and hybrid financial instruments;

---

 

Asset Management:

•       asset management fees for our on-going asset manager services provided to various Investment Vehicles, which may include fees both senior and subordinate to the securities issued by the Investment Vehicle;

•      incentive management fees earned based on the performance of the various Investment Vehicles; and

•       income or loss from equity method affiliates

Principal Investing:

•      gains and losses (unrealized and realized) and income and expense earned on securities, primarily in investments in Investment Vehicles we manage, classified as other investments, at fair value; and

•       income or loss from equity method affiliates.

Business Environment

Our business is materially affected by economic conditions in the financial markets, political conditions, broad trends in business and finance, changes in volume and price levels of securities transactions, and changes in interest rates, all of which can affect our profitability and are unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the financial markets. Severe market fluctuations or weak economic conditions could continue to reduce our trading volume and revenues and adversely affect our profitability.

The markets remain uneven and vulnerable to changes in investor sentiment. We believe the general business environment will continue to be challenging for the remainder of 2013.  

A portion of our revenues is generated from net trading activity. We engage in proprietary trading for our own account, provide securities financing for our customers, as well as execute “riskless” trades with a customer order in hand resulting in limited market risk to us. The inventory of securities held for our own account, as well as held to facilitate customer trades, and our market making activities are sensitive to market movements.

A portion of our revenues is generated from new issue and advisory engagements. The fees charged and volume of these engagements are sensitive to the overall business environment.

A portion of our revenues is generated from management fees. Our ability to charge management fees and the amount of those fees is dependent upon the underlying investment performance and stability of the Investment Vehicles. If these types of investments do not provide attractive returns to investors, the demand for such instruments will likely fall, thereby reducing our opportunity to earn new management fees or maintain existing management fees.  As of June 30, 2013,  95% of our existing AUM are CDOs. The creation of CDOs and permanent capital vehicles has depended upon a vibrant securitization market. Since 2008, volumes within the securitization market have dropped significantly and have not recovered since that time. Consequently, we have been unable to complete a new securitization since 2008.

A portion of our revenues is generated from our principal investing activities. Therefore, our revenues are impacted by the underlying operating results of these investments. As of June 30, 2013, we had $28,686 of other investments, at fair value representing our principal investment portfolio. Of this amount, $27,927, or 97%, was comprised of investments in 4 separate investment funds and permanent capital vehicles: Star Asia, EuroDekania, Tiptree, and the Star Asia Special Situations Fund. Furthermore, the investment in Star Asia is our largest single principal investment and, as of June 30, 2013, had a fair value of $20,935, representing 73% of the total amount of other investments, at fair value. Star Asia seeks to invest in Asian commercial real estate structured finance products, including CMBS, corporate debt of REITs and real estate operating companies, whole loans, mezzanine loans, and other commercial real estate fixed income investments, and in real property located in Japan. Therefore, our results of operations and financial condition will be significantly impacted by the financial results of these investments and, in the case of Star Asia, the Japanese real estate market in general.

Margin Pressures in Corporate Bond Brokerage Business

Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the overall strength of the economy and financial market activity. Overall market conditions are a product of many factors beyond our control and can be unpredictable. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including the level of participation in the financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors including the volatility of the equity and fixed income markets, the level and shape of the various yield curves, and the volume and value of trading in securities.

---

 

 

Since 2010, both margins and volumes in certain products and markets within the corporate bond brokerage business have decreased materially as competition has increased and general market activity has declined. Further, we continue to expect that competition will increase over time, resulting in continued margin pressure.

Our response to this margin compression has included: (i) building a diversified securitized product trading platform; (ii) expanding our European capital markets business; (iii) acquiring new product lines; and (iv) monitoring our fixed costs. During the second half of 2012, we undertook cost-cutting initiatives by merging support functionality among and across many of our subsidiaries and business lines. However, there can be no certainty that these efforts will be sufficient. If insufficient, we will likely see a decline in profitability.

In the second quarter of 2013, the Company experienced a reduction in the value of its trading inventory.  The mark to market losses in the trading inventory related to rising interest rates.  The timing coincided with the Federal Reserve’s announcement that it may begin to taper its quantitative easing programs.  In addition, beginning in June 2013, the Company experienced a reduction in trading volumes as well.  The volume reduction was broad based but was most evident in the Company’s agency new issue and trading businesses and its TBA origination business.  The Company may experience reduced trading volumes in the future as a result of market uncertainty surrounding Federal Reserve quantitative easing programs. 

Legislation Affecting the Financial Services Industry

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act contains a variety of provisions designed to regulate financial markets, including credit and derivative transactions. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking that will take effect over the next several years, thus making it difficult to assess the impact on the financial industry, including us, at this time. The Dodd-Frank Act establishes enhanced compensation and corporate governance oversight for the financial services industry, provides a specific framework for payment, clearing and settlement regulation, and empowers the SEC to adopt regulations requiring new fiduciary duties and other more stringent regulation of broker-dealers, investment companies, and investment advisers. We will continue to monitor all applicable developments in the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act and expect to adapt successfully to any new applicable legislative and regulatory requirements.

Recent Events

Investment by Mead Park Capital and CBF

On May 9, 2013, the Company entered into definitive agreements with Mead Park Capital Partners LLC (“Mead Park Capital”) and CBF, pursuant to which each will make investments in the Company, totaling $13,746 in the aggregate. See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following section provides a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the specified periods. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

---

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  

 

 

 

Revenues

Revenues decreased by $16,037, or 37%, to $27,760 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $43,797 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) a decrease of $12,953 in net trading; (ii)  a decrease of $628 in asset management revenue; (iii)  an increase of $301 in new issue and advisory revenue; and (iv) a decrease of $2,757 in principal transactions and other income.

Net Trading

Net trading revenue decreased by $12,953, or 34%, to $24,689 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $37,642 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.     The following table provides detail on net trading revenue by operation:

 

---

 

 

 

The decline in revenue in JVB was primarily due to the decline in trading revenue earned in the following asset classes: agency securities, treasury securities, and municipal bonds. The decline in PrinceRidge and other capital markets was primarily due to lower trading revenue earned in the equity derivatives product trading of $4,438 as a result of the sale of that business in December 2012. The remaining decline was primarily due to decline in trading revenue in agency securities, treasury securities, municipal bonds, high yield corporate bonds, and structured products.  The decrease in revenue in CCFL was primarily due to a decrease in overall volumes. 

Our net trading revenue includes unrealized gains on our trading investments, as of the applicable measurement date, that may never be realized due to changes in market or other conditions not in our control.  This may adversely affect the ultimate value realized from these investments. In addition, our net trading revenue also includes realized gains on certain proprietary trading positions. Our ability to derive trading gains from such trading positions is subject to overall market conditions. Due to volatility and uncertainty in the capital markets, the net trading revenue recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013, may not be indicative of future results. Furthermore, some of the assets included in the Investments-trading line of our consolidated balance sheets represent level 3 valuations within the FASB fair value hierarchy. Level 3 assets are carried at fair value based on estimates derived using internal valuation models and other estimates. See notes 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The fair value estimates made by the Company may not be indicative of the final sale price at which these assets may be sold.

Asset Management

Assets Under Management

Our assets under management (“AUM”) equals the sum of: (1) the gross assets included in CDOs that we have sponsored and manage; plus (2) the NAV of the permanent capital vehicles and investment funds we manage; plus (3) the NAV of other accounts we manage.

Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations used by other asset managers and, as a result, this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. This definition of AUM is not necessarily identical to a definition of AUM that may be used in our management agreements.

 

 

 

---

 

 

Asset management fees decreased by $628, or 7%, to $8,917 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $9,545 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as discussed in more detail below. The following table provides a more detailed comparison of the two periods:

 

CDOs

Asset management revenue from company-sponsored CDOs decreased by $1,660 to $7,222 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $8,882 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The following table summarizes the periods presented by asset class:

 

Asset management fees for TruPs and insurance company debt – U.S. declined primarily because effective as of February 23, 2013, we no longer provide any services related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations.  On July 29, 2010, we entered into an agreement with a third party whereby we sold the management rights and responsibilities related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations.  In connection with this agreement, we entered into a services agreement under which we provided certain services to the third party purchaser.  This services agreement expired on February 23, 2013.  We will continue to receive certain incentive payments through February 23, 2017 if the management fees earned by the third party exceed certain thresholds.  We will continue to recognize these incentive payments, if any, as earned.  

Asset management fees for high grade and mezzanine ABS declined primarily because the average AUM in this asset class declined due to defaults of the underlying assets, repayments of the underlying assets, and liquidations of certain CDOs.

Asset management fees for broadly syndicated loans –Europe represent revenue from a single CLO.  Prior to August 2012, we served as the junior manager of this CLO and we shared management fees evenly with the lead manager.  In August 2012, we became the lead manager (and remained junior manager).  Subsequent to becoming lead manager, we earn all of the management fees related to this CLO which has caused the increase in asset management fees from broadly syndicated loans – Europe.

Other 

Other asset management revenue increased by $1,032 to $1,695 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $663 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

 

Other asset management revenue increased by $1,069 primarily due to the acquisition of Star Asia Manager which was effective March 1, 2013.  Prior to the acquisition, we owned 50% of Star Asia Manager and treated the investment as an equity method investment.  See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

---

 

New Issue and Advisory Revenue

New issue and advisory revenue increased by $301, or 24%, to $1,567 for the  six months ended June 30, 2013 from $1,266 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Our revenue earned from new issue and advisory has been, and we expect will continue to be, volatile. We earn revenue from a limited number of engagements. Therefore, a small change in the number of engagements can result in large fluctuations in the revenue recognized. Further, even if the number of engagements stays consistent, the average revenue per engagement can fluctuate considerably. Finally, our revenue is generally earned when an underlying transaction closes (rather than on a monthly or quarterly basis). Therefore, the timing of underlying transactions increases the volatility of our revenue recognition. 

Principal Transactions and Other Income

Principal transactions and other income decreased by $2,757 to ($7,413) for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to ($4,656) for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  

 

 

Change in fair value of other investments, at fair value

Change in fair value of other investments, at fair value decreased by $4,785 to ($9,993) for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to ($5,208) for the six months ended June 30, 2012. 

 

For the periods presented above, the change in fair value of our investment in EuroDekania was primarily the result of the change in the underlying NAV of EuroDekania. 

Star Asia is an investment fund that is exposed to changes in its value due to the performance of its underlying investments. The value of our investment in Star Asia has also been impacted by the fact that Star Asia’s investments are primarily denominated in Japanese Yen and Star Asia itself does not hedge against currency fluctuations. The following table shows the change in the value of our investment in Star Asia and how it was impacted by these items:

---

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange: This line item represents the impact to fair value of our investment in Star Asia from currency fluctuations. This is because Star Asia’s investments are primarily denominated in Japanese Yen and Star Asia itself does not hedge against currency fluctuations. Accordingly, we are exposed to increases and decreases in the value of our investment in Star Asia that result from fluctuations of the Japanese Yen as compared to the U.S. Dollar. From time to time, we may seek to minimize this risk by entering into a Japanese Yen hedge. However, our hedging activities could negatively impact our liquidity. That is, the hedge itself settles in cash on a periodic basis while our investment in Star Asia is comparatively illiquid. Therefore, we continuously consider the appropriate level for the Japanese Yen hedge, especially considering our overall corporate liquidity position. We may or may not enter into hedges in the future based on our corporate liquidity. Any un-hedged portion of our investment in Star Asia will continue to be exposed to currency fluctuations.

As of June 30, 2013, our long exposure to the Japanese Yen was 3.4 billion Japanese Yen. Our Japanese Yen hedge was 1.3 billion Japanese Yen.  The spot rate of the U.S. Dollar to Japanese Yen was $99.14 as of June 30, 2013, which means our un-hedged portion of Star Asia was $21.7 million. As of June 30, 2012, our long exposure to the Japanese Yen was 3.6 billion Japanese Yen. Our Japanese Yen hedge was 1.0 billion Japanese Yen.  The spot rate of U.S. Dollar to Japanese Yen was $79.79 as of June 30, 2012, which means our un-hedged portion of Star Asia was $33.2 million.

Underlying investment values: This line item represents the impact to the fair value of our investment in Star Asia from changes in the underlying net investment values of Star Asia’s investments, net of debt, exclusive of the impact of foreign currency changes.  

 

Effective June 30, 2013, we changed the way we calculate the fair value of our investment in Tiptree.  Previously, we carried our investment at the underlying NAV of the fund.  However, Tiptree recently completed a reorganization.  As a result of the reorganization, our investment in Tiptree can be exchanged into shares of Tiptree Financial, Inc. based on a stated exchange ratio (which is generally fixed, but can be adjusted for certain events like stock dividends or stock splits).  Tiptree Financial Inc. is publicly traded over the counter.  Therefore, beginning June 30, 2013, we calculate the fair value of our investment in Tiptree by using the closing over the counter price for Tiptree Financial Inc. and adjusting for the exchange ratio.  The decline in the fair value of our investment was primarily due to this change in method of calculating the fair value of our investment.

In December 2012, we made an investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund. We carry our investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund at the NAV of the underlying fund.

Dividends, interest, and other

Dividends, interest, and other increased by $2,028 to $2,580 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $552 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Prior the Merger, AFN had entered into an arrangement whereby it guaranteed a portion of a particular loan that was owned by the Alesco XIV securitization.  This arrangement was accounted for as a guarantee and we recorded a liability of $1,084 at the Merger Date.  In May 2013, the underlying loan was paid off in full by the borrower.  As a result our guarantee was extinguished.  We recorded other revenue of $1,084 in the second quarter of 2013 and wrote off the liability.    See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.    The remaining increase in dividends interest and other was comprised of: (i) $495 increase from our revenue share arrangement with Strategos Capital Management LLC; (ii) $212 increase in dividend income related to EuroDekania; and (iii) 237 increase related to foreign currency gains and other miscellaneous items. 

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased by $7,440, or 15%, to $40,730 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $48,170 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) a decrease of $7,309 in compensation and benefits; (ii) an increase of $392 in business development, occupancy, and equipment; (iii) a decrease of $1,306 in

---

 

subscriptions, clearing, and execution; (iv) an increase of $848 of professional fee and other operating; and (v) a decrease of $65 of depreciation and amortization. 

Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and benefits decreased by $7,309, or 22%, to $26,018 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $33,327 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  

 

 

 

Cash compensation and benefits in the table above is primarily comprised of salary, incentive compensation, and benefits.  Cash compensation and benefits decreased by $6,895 to $24,464 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, from $31,359 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  This decrease was primarily a result of a decrease in incentive compensation which is tied to revenue and operating profitability.  Our total headcount decreased from 216 at June 30, 2012 to 204 at June 30, 2013.  From time to time, the Company pays employees severance when they are terminated without cause. These severance payments are included within cash compensation in the table above.

Equity-based compensation decreased by $414 to $1,554 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $1,968 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  There were three major components of this change:

 

First, in the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized equity based compensation of $993 related to equity based grants to Mr. Michael T. Hutchins and Mr. John P. Costas.  The grants to Mr. Hutchins and Mr. Costas were subsequently forfeited in July 2012. Second, we recognized $1,794 more in reversals of equity compensation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 due to forfeitures and employees not meeting their performance targets.  Finally, we recognized a reduction in other equity compensation expense of $1,215 primarily as a result of employee grants becoming fully vested or forfeited after June 30, 2012, net of new grants after June 30, 2012. 

Business Development, Occupancy, and Equipment

Business development, occupancy, and equipment increased by $392, or 16%, to $2,842 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $2,450 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in technology support expenditures of $362.  As part of our cost savings measures, we terminated a significant portion of our in house information technology staff and outsourced those services to third party providers. 

Subscriptions, Clearing, and Execution

Subscriptions, clearing, and execution decreased by $1,306, or 22%, to $4,666 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $5,972 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.   The decrease was due to a reduction in clearing and execution costs of $513 primarily as a result of lower trading volume and a decrease in subscriptions of $793 as a result of the cost savings measures implemented. 

---

 

Professional Fees and Other Operating Expenses

Professional fees and other operating expenses increased by $848, or 15%, to $6,535 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $5,687 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in consulting fees of $892 attributable to the use of certain consultants at CCFL.  Prior to August 2012, CCFL was the junior manager of a European CLO.  In August 2012, CCFL became the lead manager and remained the junior manager.  Subsequent to becoming the lead manager, we earn all of the management fees related to this CLO.  The consulting fees are being incurred to assist CCFL in performing its role as lead manager. 

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased by $65, or 9%, to $669 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $734 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decline was due to a decrease in depreciation expense related to certain property and equipment that was fully depreciated of $181 partially offset by depreciation and amortization related to the acquisition of Star Asia Manager of $116.

Non-Operating Income and Expense

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense decreased by $255, or 11%, to $2,064 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $2,319 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was comprised of:  (i) a decrease of $371 of interest incurred on the convertible senior notes (comprised of our 7.625% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 (“Old Notes”) and New Notes) due to repurchases and redemptions of the Old Notes during the six months ended June 30, 2012; (ii) a reduction of $71 of interest incurred on the subordinated notes payable due to repayments and repurchases of these notes subsequent to June 30, 2012; (iii) a reduction of $61 of interest incurred on the junior subordinated notes as a result of the interest rate on one of the two issuances changing from a fixed rate to a lower variable rate beginning in July 31, 2012; partially offset by (iv) a decrease of $132 of interest income related to the reduction in the amount owed to withdrawing partners of PrinceRidge which was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2012; (v) and increase in interest expense of $109 relating to the amortization of the discount attributable to a payment made by the Company to Sentinel Management Group, Inc. (“Sentinel”) in connection with the settlement of certain litigation matters involving the Company’s U.S. broker-dealer, Cohen & Company Securities, LLC and Sentinel (the “Sentinel Litigation”); and (vi) $7 of other increases in interest expense.  See notes 4, 12, 13, and 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income (expense), net was $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to ($4,354) for the six months ended June 30, 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, other income (expense), net represented expense of $4,357 related to the settlement of the Sentinel Litigation partially offset by a gain on repurchase of debt of $3. 

Income / (Loss) from Equity Method Affiliates

Income from equity method affiliates decreased by $428, or 21% to $1,614 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $2,042 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Income or loss from equity method affiliates represents our share of the related entities’ earnings.

 

See notes 4, 11, and 20 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

---

 

Income Tax Expense

The income tax expense decreased by $8 to income tax expense of $46 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $54 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The tax expense realized by us for both periods was primarily the result of taxes incurred at our French subsidiary, Cohen & Compagnie SAS as well as local level taxes incurred in the United States.  See note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete description of the Company’s tax attributes and unrecognized tax benefits.

Net Income / (Loss) Attributable to the Non-controlling Interest

Net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was comprised of the non-controlling interest related to member interests in the Operating LLC other than interests held by us for the relevant periods. In addition, net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest also included non-controlling interest related to entities that were consolidated by the Operating LLC but not wholly owned.

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

(1)    Non-controlling interest is recorded on a monthly basis. Because earnings are recognized unevenly throughout the year and the non-controlling interest percentage may change during the period, the average effective non-controlling interest percentage may not equal the percentage at the end of any period or the simple average of the beginning and ending percentages.

 

---

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  

 

 

 

Revenues

Revenues decreased by $11,303, or 45%, to $13,734 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $25,037 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) a decrease of $8,321 in net trading; (ii)  a decrease of $453 in asset management revenue; (iii)  an increase of $383 in new issue and advisory revenue; and (iv) a decrease of $2,912 in principal transactions and other income.

---

 

Net Trading

Net trading revenue decreased by $8,321, or 42%, to $11,630 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $19,951 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.     The following table provides detail on net trading revenue by operation.

 

 

 

 

  Trading revenue is down in all three groups due to lower trading volumes and margins. The decline in revenue in JVB was primarily due to the decline in trading revenue earned in the following asset classes: agency securities, treasury securities, and municipal bonds. The decline in PrinceRidge and other capital markets was primarily due to lower trading revenue earned in the equity derivatives product trading of $1,806 as a result of the sale of that business in December 2012. The remaining decline was primarily due to decline in trading revenue in municipal bonds and structured products.  The decrease in revenue in CCFL was primarily due to a decrease in overall volumes.

Our net trading revenue includes unrealized gains on our trading investments, as of the applicable measurement date, that may never be realized due to changes in market or other conditions not in our control.  This may adversely affect the ultimate value realized from these investments. In addition, our net trading revenue also includes realized gains on certain proprietary trading positions. Our ability to derive trading gains from such trading positions is subject to overall market conditions. Due to volatility and uncertainty in the capital markets, the net trading revenue recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2013, may not be indicative of future results. Furthermore, some of the assets included in the Investments-trading line of our consolidated balance sheets represent level 3 valuations within the FASB fair value hierarchy. Level 3 assets are carried at fair value based on estimates derived using internal valuation models and other estimates. See notes 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The fair value estimates made by the Company may not be indicative of the final sale price at which these assets may be sold.

Asset Management

 

Asset management fees decreased by $453, or 10%, to $4,155 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $4,608 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as discussed in more detail below. The following table provides a more detailed comparison of the two periods:

 

CDOs

Asset management revenue from company-sponsored CDOs decreased by $1,253 to $3,121 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $4,374 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The following table summarizes the periods presented by asset class:

 

 

---

 

Asset management fees for TruPs and insurance company debt – U.S. declined primarily because effective as of February 23, 2013, we no longer provide any services related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations.  On July 29, 2010, we entered into an agreement with a third party whereby we sold the management rights and responsibilities related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations.  In connection with this agreement, we entered into a services agreement under which we provided certain services to the third party purchaser.  This services agreement expired on February 23, 2013.  We will continue to receive certain incentive payments through February 23, 2017 if the management fees earned by the third party exceed certain thresholds.  We will continue to recognize these incentive payments, if any, as earned.  

Asset management fees for high grade and mezzanine ABS declined primarily because the average AUM in this asset class declined due to defaults of the underlying assets, repayments of the underlying assets, and liquidations of certain CDOs.

Asset management fees for broadly syndicated loans –Europe represent revenue from a single CLO.  Prior to August 2012, we served as the junior manager of this CLO and we shared management fees evenly with the lead manager.  In August 2012, we became the lead manager (and remained junior manager).  Subsequent to becoming lead manager, we earn all of the management fees related to this CLO which caused the increase in asset management fees for broadly syndicated loans - Europe. 

Other 

Other asset management revenue increased by $800  to  $1,034 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $234 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

 

Other asset management revenue increased by $792 primarily due to the acquisition of Star Asia Manager which was effective March 1, 2013.  Prior to such acquisition, we owned 50% of Star Asia Manager and treated the investment as an equity method investment.  See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

New Issue and Advisory Revenue

New issue and advisory revenue increased by $383 to $572 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $189 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Our revenue earned from new issue and advisory has been, and we expect will continue to be, volatile. We earn revenue from a limited number of engagements. Therefore, a small change in the number of engagements can result in large fluctuations in the revenue recognized. Further, even if the number of engagements stays consistent, the average revenue per engagement can fluctuate considerably. Finally, our revenue is generally earned when an underlying transaction closes (rather than on a monthly or quarterly basis). Therefore, the timing of underlying transactions increases the volatility of our revenue recognition. 

Principal Transactions and Other Income

Principal transactions and other income decreased by $2,912 to ($2,623) for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $289 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Change in fair value of other investments, at fair value

Change in fair value of other investments, at fair value decreased by $4,560 to ($4,594) for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to ($34) for the three months ended June 30, 2012. 

 

 

 

 

For the periods presented above, the change in fair value of our investment in EuroDekania was primarily the result of the change in the underlying NAV of EuroDekania. 

Star Asia is an investment fund that is exposed to changes in its value due to the performance of its underlying investments. The value of our investment in Star Asia has also been impacted by the fact that Star Asia’s investments are primarily denominated in Japanese Yen and Star Asia itself does not hedge against currency fluctuations. The following table shows the change in the value of our investment in Star Asia and how it was impacted by these items:

 

 

 

Foreign exchange: This line item represents the impact to fair value of our investment in Star Asia from currency fluctuations. This is because Star Asia’s investments are primarily denominated in Japanese Yen and Star Asia itself does not hedge against currency fluctuations. Accordingly, we are exposed to increases and decreases in the value of our investment in Star Asia that result from fluctuations of the Japanese Yen as compared to the U.S. Dollar. From time to time, we may seek to minimize this risk by entering into a Japanese Yen hedge. However, our hedging activities could negatively impact our liquidity. That is, the hedge itself settles in cash on a periodic basis while our investment in Star Asia is comparatively illiquid. Therefore, we continuously consider the appropriate level for the Japanese Yen hedge, especially considering our overall corporate liquidity position. We may or may not enter into hedges in the future based on our corporate liquidity. Any un-hedged portion of our investment in Star Asia will continue to be exposed to currency fluctuations.

As of June 30, 2013, our long exposure to the Japanese Yen was 3.4 billion Japanese Yen. Our Japanese Yen hedge was 1.3 billion Japanese Yen.  The spot rate of the U.S. Dollar to Japanese Yen was $99.14 as of June 30, 2013, which means our un-hedged portion of Star Asia was $21.7 million. As of June 30, 2012, our long exposure to the Japanese Yen was 3.6 billion Japanese Yen. Our Japanese Yen hedge was 1.0 billion Japanese Yen.  The spot rate of U.S. Dollar to Japanese Yen was $79.79 as of June 30, 2012, which means our un-hedged portion of Star Asia was $33.2 million.

Underlying investment values: This line item represents the impact to the fair value of our investment in Star Asia from changes in the underlying net investment values of Star Asia’s investments, net of debt, exclusive of the impact of foreign currency changes.  

 

Effective June 30, 2013, we changed the way we calculate the fair value of our investment in Tiptree.  Previously, we carried our investment at the underlying NAV of the fund.  However, Tiptree recently completed a reorganization.  As a result of the

---

 

reorganization, our investment in Tiptree can be exchanged into shares of Tiptree Financial, Inc. based on a stated exchange ratio (which is generally fixed, but can be adjusted for certain events like stock dividends or stock splits).  Tiptree Financial Inc. is publicly traded over the counter.  Therefore, beginning June 30, 2013, we calculate the fair value of our investment in Tiptree by using the closing over the counter price for Tiptree Financial Inc. and adjusting for the exchange ratio.  The decline in the fair value of our investment was primarily due to this change in method of calculating the fair value of our investment.

In December 2012, we made an investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund. We carry our investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund at the NAV of the underlying fund.

The change in other investments of $288 was comprised (i) a net decrease of $328 related to currency hedges; (ii) a net increase of $40 related to other miscellaneous investments. 

Dividends, interest, and other

Dividends, interest, and other increased by $1,648 to $1,971 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $323 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Prior the Merger, AFN had entered into an arrangement whereby it guaranteed a portion of a particular loan that was owned by the Alesco XIV securitization.  This arrangement was accounted for as a guarantee and we recorded a liability of $1,084 at the Merger Date.  In May 2013, the underlying loan was paid off in full by the borrower.  As a result our guarantee was extinguished.  We recorded other revenue of $1,084 in the second quarter of 2013 and wrote off the liability.  See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  The remaining increase in dividends interest and other was comprised of: (i) $150 increase from our revenue share arrangement with Strategos Capital Management LLC; (ii) $306 increase in dividend income related to EuroDekania; and (iii) $108 increase related to foreign currency gains and other miscellaneous items. 

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased by $4,575, or 19%, to $19,632 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $24,207 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) a decrease of $4,532 in compensation and benefits; (ii) an increase of $111 in business development, occupancy, and equipment; (iii) a decrease of $550 in subscriptions, clearing, and execution; (iv) an increase of $380 of professional fee and other operating; and (v) an increase of $16 of depreciation and amortization. 

Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and benefits decreased by $4,532, or 27%, to $12,521 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $17,053 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  

 

 

 

 

Cash compensation and benefits in the table above is primarily comprised of salary, incentive compensation, and benefits. Cash compensation and benefits decreased by $3,537 to $12,096 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, from $15,633 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  This decrease was primarily a result of a decrease in incentive compensation which is tied to revenue and operating profitability. Our total headcount decreased from 216 at June 30, 2012 to 204 at June 30, 2013.  From time to time, the Company pays employees severance when they are terminated without cause. These severance payments are included within cash compensation in the table above.

Equity-based compensation decreased by $995 to $425 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $1,420 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  There were three major components of this change:

---

 

 

 

First, in the three months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized equity based compensation of $496 related to equity based grants to Mr. Michael T. Hutchins and Mr. John P. Costas.  The grants to Mr. Hutchins and Mr. Costas were subsequently forfeited in July 2012. Second, we recognized $454 more in reversals of equity compensation expense in the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 due to forfeitures and employees not meeting their performance targets.  Finally, we recognized a reduction in other equity compensation expense of $953 primarily as a result of employee grants becoming fully vested or forfeited after June 30, 2012, net of new grants after June 30, 2012. 

Business Development, Occupancy, and Equipment

Business development, occupancy, and equipment increased by $111, or 9%, to $1,387 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $1,276 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in technology support expenditures of $180; partially offset by other decreases primarily in business development expenses.  As part of our cost savings measures, we terminated a significant portion of our in house information technology staff and outsourced those services to third party providers. 

Subscriptions, Clearing, and Execution

Subscriptions, clearing, and execution decreased by $550, or 19%, to $2,349 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $2,899 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was due to a reduction in clearing and execution costs of $196 primarily as a result of lower trading volume and a decrease in subscriptions of $354 as a result of the cost savings measures implemented. 

Professional Fees and Other Operating Expenses

Professional fees and other operating expenses increased by $380, or 14%, to $3,016 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $2,636 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was the result of an increase in consulting fees of $154 attributable to the use of certain consultants at CCFL.  Prior to August 2012, CCFL was the junior manager of a European CLO.  In August 2012, CCFL became the lead manager and remained the junior manager.  Subsequent to becoming the lead manager, we earn all of the management fees related to this CLO.  The consulting fees are being incurred to assist CCFL in performing its role as lead manager.  The remaining net increase of $226 represented a net increase in legal and professional fees which includes the accruals surrounding outstanding litigation.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased by $16, or 5%, to $359 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $343 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was due to depreciation and amortization related to the acquisition of Star Asia Manager of $85; partially offset by other decreases of $69 related to certain property and equipment that was fully depreciated.

Non-Operating Income and Expense

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense decreased by $69, or 6%, to $1,035 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $1,104 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was comprised of:  (i) a decrease of $136 of interest incurred on the convertible senior notes (comprised of our Old Notes and New Notes) due to repurchases and redemptions of the Old Notes during the six months ended June 30, 2012; (ii) a reduction of $36 of interest incurred on the subordinated notes payable due to repayments and repurchases of these notes subsequent to June 30, 2012; (iii) a reduction of $23 of interest incurred on the junior subordinated notes as a result of the interest rate on one of the two issuances changing from a fixed rate to a lower variable rate beginning in July 31, 2012; partially offset by (iv) a decrease of $67 of interest income related to the reduction in the amount owed to withdrawing partners of PrinceRidge which was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2012; (v) and increase in interest expense of $55 relating to the amortization of the discount attributable to the payment made by the Company to Sentinel in connection with the Sentinel Litigation; and (vi) $4 of other

---

 

increases in interest expense.  See notes 4, 12, 13, and 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income (expense), net was $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to ($4,357) for the three months ended June 30, 2012. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, other income (expense), net represented expense of $4,357 related to the settlement of the Sentinel litigation.

Income / (Loss) from Equity Method Affiliates

Income from equity method affiliates decreased  by $1,431, or 94% to $95 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $1,526 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Income or loss from equity method affiliates represents our share of the related entities’ earnings.

 

 

 

See notes 4, 11, and 20 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

Income Tax Expense

The income tax expense decreased by $29 to income tax expense of $34 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $63 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The tax expense realized by us for both periods was primarily the result of taxes incurred at our French subsidiary, Cohen & Compagnie SAS, as well as local level taxes incurred in the United States.  See note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete description of the Company’s tax attributes and unrecognized tax benefits.

Net Income / (Loss) Attributable to the Non-controlling Interest

Net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was comprised of the non-controlling interest related to member interests in the Operating LLC other than interests held by us for the relevant periods. In addition, net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest also included non-controlling interest related to entities that were consolidated by the Operating LLC but not wholly owned.

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)    Non-controlling interest is recorded on a monthly basis. Because earnings are recognized unevenly throughout the year and the non-controlling interest percentage may change during the period, the average effective non-controlling interest percentage may not equal the percentage at the end of any period or the simple average of the beginning and ending percentages.

 

---

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements including ongoing commitments to repay debt borrowings, make interest payments on outstanding borrowings, fund investments, and support other general business purposes. In addition, our United States and United Kingdom broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to certain regulatory requirements to maintain minimum levels of net capital. Historically, our primary sources of funds have been our operating activities and general corporate borrowings. In addition, our trading operations have generally been financed by use of collateralized securities financing arrangements as well as margin loans. Since January 2010, we have significantly expanded our trading operations leading to a greater amount of securities owned as well as larger balances of securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

Certain subsidiaries of the Operating LLC have restrictions on the withdrawal of capital and otherwise in making distributions and loans. CCPR and JVB are subject to net capital restrictions imposed by the SEC and FINRA that require certain minimum levels of net capital to remain in these subsidiaries. In addition, these restrictions could potentially impose notice requirements or limit our ability to withdraw capital above the required minimum amounts (excess capital) whether through a distribution or a loan. CCFL is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (formerly known as the Financial Services Authority) in the United Kingdom (“FCA”) and must maintain certain minimum levels of capital. See note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

See Liquidity and Capital Resources – Debt Financing and Liquidity and Capital Resources – Contractual Obligations below.

During the third quarter of 2010, our Board of Directors initiated a dividend of $0.05 per quarter, which was paid regularly through December 31, 2011. Beginning in 2012, the Company declared a dividend of $0.02 per quarter, which was paid regularly through the second quarter of 2013. The Company’s Board of Directors has the power to decide to increase, reduce, or eliminate dividends in the future. The Board of Director’s decision will depend on a variety of factors, including business, financial, and regulatory considerations as well as any limitations under Maryland law or imposed by any agreements governing indebtedness of the Company. There can be no assurances that such dividends will be maintained or increased and, if maintained or increased, will not subsequently be discontinued.

Each time a cash dividend was declared by our Board of Directors, a pro rata distribution was made to the other members of the Operating LLC upon the payment of dividends to stockholders of the Company.

On August 6, 2013, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.02 per share, which will be paid on our common stock on September 4, 2013 to stockholders of record on August 21, 2013. A pro rata distribution will be made to the other members of the Operating LLC upon the payment of the dividends to stockholders of the Company. 

---

 

Cash Flows

We have four primary uses for capital:

(1) To fund the operations of our Capital Markets business segment: Our Capital Markets business segment utilizes capital (i) to fund securities inventory to facilitate client trading activities; (ii) for risk trading on the firm’s own account; (iii) to fund our collateralized securities lending activities; (iv) for temporary capital needs associated with underwriting activities; (v) to fund business expansion into existing or new product lines; and (vi) to fund any operating losses incurred.

(2) To fund investments: Our investments take several forms, including investments in securities and “sponsor investments” in permanent capital vehicles or investment funds. We may need to raise additional debt or equity financing in order to ensure we have the capital necessary to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities.

(3) To fund mergers or acquisitions: We may opportunistically use capital to acquire other asset managers, individual asset management contracts, or financial services firms. To the extent our liquidity sources are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funding through an equity or debt offering. No assurances can be given that additional financing will be available in the future, or that if available, such financing will be on favorable terms.

(4) To fund potential dividends and distributions: During the third quarter of 2010 and for each subsequent quarter through June 30, 2013, we have declared a dividend. A pro rata distribution has been paid to the other members of the Operating LLC upon the payment of any dividends to stockholders of IFMI.

If we are unable to raise sufficient capital on economically favorable terms, we may need to reduce the amount of capital invested for the uses described above, which may adversely impact earnings and our ability to pay dividends.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we maintained cash and cash equivalents of $9,916 and $14,500, respectively. We generated cash from or used cash for the following activities:

 

 

             See the statement of cash flows in our consolidated financial statements. We believe our available cash and cash equivalents, as well as our investment in our trading portfolio and related borrowing capacity, will provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash needs of our ongoing operations in the near term.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 

As of June 30, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents were $9,916, representing a decrease of $4,584 from December 31, 2012. The decrease was attributable to the cash used by operating activities of $5,281, the cash provided by investing activities of $2,646, the cash used by financing activities of $1,774, and the decrease in cash caused by change in exchange rates of $175.  

The cash used by operating activities of $5,281 was comprised of (a) net cash outflows of $8,970 related to working capital fluctuations (b) net cash inflows of  $6,553 from trading activities comprised of our investments-trading, trading securities sold, not yet purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and receivables and payables from brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies, as well as the changes in unrealized gains and losses on the investments-trading and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased; and (c)  net cash outflows from other earnings items of $2,864 (which represents net income or loss adjusted for the following non-cash operating items: other income / (expense), realized and unrealized gains and losses on other investments, income or loss from equity method affiliates, equity based compensation, and depreciation and amortization).

---

 

 

The cash provided by investing activities of $2,646 was comprised of (a) $679 of cash acquired due to the acquisition of Star Asia Manager; (b) $708 of proceeds from sales and returns of principal from other investments, at fair value; (c) $2,881 in distributions received from equity method affiliates (see note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Form 10-Q); net of (d) $1,064 of cash used to acquire other investments, at fair value which was comprised of $302 of additional investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund and $762 invested in a yen currency hedge; (e) $10 of investment in equity method affiliates and (f) $548 used to purchase furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements. 

The cash used in financing activities of $1,774 was comprised of (a) $619 repayment of debt which includes $272 related to the Star Asia Manager note payable and $347 related to our subordinated notes payable; (b) $36 used for the payment of employee tax obligations related to restricted stock vesting; (c) $317 of net redemptions for the redeemable non-controlling interest related to PrinceRidge; (d) $86 of repayments of mandatorily redeemable equity interests related to PrinceRidge; (e) $212 of distributions to non-controlling interests related to the Operating LLC; and (f) $504 in dividends to shareholders of IFMI. 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 

As of June 30, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents were $12,944, representing a net decrease of $5,277 from December 31, 2011. The decrease was attributable to the cash provided by operating activities of $1,079, the cash provided by investing activities of $5,402, and the cash used by financing activities of $11,712, and the decrease in cash caused by change in exchange rates of $46.  

The cash provided by operating activities of $1,079 was comprised of (a) net cash outflows of $3,385 related to working capital fluctuations (b)  net cash inflows of $7,657 from trading activities comprised of our investments-trading, trading securities sold, not yet purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and receivables and payables from brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies, as well as the changes in unrealized gains and losses on the investments-trading and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased; and (c) a net cash outflows from other earnings items of $3,193 (which represents net income or loss adjusted for the following non-cash operating items: other income / (expense), realized and unrealized gains and losses on other investments, income or loss from equity method affiliates, equity based compensation, and depreciation and amortization).

The cash provided by investing activities of $5,402 was comprised of  (a) cash received of $5,513 from our equity method affiliates, Star Asia Manager, Star Asia SPV, Star Asia Opportunity, and Star Asia Capital Management; (b) cash proceeds from the return of principal of $21 from our investments in certain residential loans and $17 from the sale of a certain residential loan; partially offset by (c) the purchase of additional furniture and leasehold improvements of $42; (d) the investment of $6 in the equity method affiliate Star Asia Capital Management; and (e) the purchase of foreign currency forward contracts for $101.

The cash used in financing activities of $11,712 was comprised of (a) the repurchase of $150 notional amount of Old Notes for $147; (b) the redemption of $10,110 notional amount of the Old Notes for $10,110; (c) distributions to the non-controlling interest holders of $210; (d) dividends to the Company’s stockholders of $429; (e) the net redemption of the redeemable non-controlling interest of $24 to withdrawing partners from PrinceRidge (see note 13 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q); and (f) the payment of $3 for employees’ tax obligations to taxing authorities related to the vesting of equity based awards. In the case of (f), the total shares withheld were determined based on the value of the restricted stock award on the applicable vesting date based on the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock. These net share settlements reduced and retired the number of shares that would have otherwise been issued as a result of the vesting and did not represent an expense to the Company.

 

---

 

Regulatory Capital Requirements

Three of our majority owned subsidiaries are licensed securities dealers in the United States or the United Kingdom. As broker-dealers, our subsidiaries, JVB and CCPR, are subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule in Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act, and our London-based subsidiary, CCFL, is subject to the regulatory supervision and requirements of the FCA. The amount of net assets that these subsidiaries may distribute is subject to restrictions under these applicable net capital rules. These subsidiaries have historically operated in excess of minimum net capital requirements. Our minimum capital requirements at June 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

 

 

We operate with more than the minimum regulatory capital requirement in our licensed broker-dealers and at June 30, 2013, total net capital, or the equivalent as defined by the relevant statutory regulations, in our licensed broker-dealers totaled $23,654. See note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In addition, our licensed broker-dealers are generally subject to capital withdrawal notification and restrictions.

Securities Financing

We maintain repurchase agreements with various third party financial institutions. There is no maximum limit as to the amount of securities that may be transferred pursuant to these agreements, and transactions are approved on a case-by-case basis. The repurchase agreements do not include substantive provisions other than those covenants and other customary provisions contained in standard master repurchase agreements. The repurchase agreements generally require us to transfer additional securities to the counterparty in the event the value of the securities then held by the counterparty in the margin account falls below specified levels and contains events of default in cases where we breach our obligations under the agreement. We receive margin calls from our repurchase agreement counterparties from time to time in the ordinary course of business. To date, we have maintained sufficient liquidity to meet margin calls, and we have never been unable to satisfy a margin call, however, no assurance can be given that we will be able to satisfy requests from our counterparties to post additional collateral in the future. See note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

If there were an event of default under the repurchase agreements, we would give our counterparty the option to terminate all repurchase transactions existing with us and make any amount due from us to the counterparty payable immediately. Repurchase obligations are full recourse obligations to us. If we were to default under a repurchase obligation, the counterparty would have recourse to our other assets if the collateral was not sufficient to satisfy the obligation in full.

The Company’s clearing brokers provide securities financing arrangements including margin arrangements and securities borrowing and lending arrangements. These arrangements generally require us to transfer additional securities or cash to the clearing broker in the event the value of the securities then held by the clearing broker in the margin account falls below specified levels and contain events of default in cases where we breach our obligations under such agreements.

An event of default under the clearing agreement would give our counterparty the option to terminate our clearing arrangement. Any amounts owed to the clearing broker would be immediately due and payable. These obligations are recourse to us. Furthermore, a termination of our clearing arrangements would result in a significant disruption to our business and would have a significant negative impact on our dealings and relationship with our customers.

The following table presents our period end balance, average monthly balance, and maximum balance at any month end during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 for receivables under resale agreements and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

---

 

 

 

Fluctuations in the balance of our repurchase agreements from period to period and intraperiod are dependent on business activity in those periods. The general growth in outstanding repurchase activity in 2013 and 2012 is reflective of supporting our overall business growth, particularly the continued expansion of our sales and trading platform. The fluctuations in the balances of our receivables under resale agreements over the periods presented were impacted by our clients’ desires to execute collateralized financing arrangements through the repurchase market or other financing products.

Average balances and period end balances will fluctuate based on market and liquidity conditions and we consider such intraperiod fluctuations as typical for the repurchase market. Month-end balances may be higher or lower than average period balances.

Debt Financing

As of June 30, 2013, we had four sources of debt financing other than securities financing arrangements: (1) contingent convertible senior notes, comprised of the New Notes; (2) junior subordinated notes payable to the following two special purpose trusts: (a) Alesco Capital Trust I and (b) Sunset Financial Statutory Trust I; and (3) the Star Asia Manager note payable.  

See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of the Company’s outstanding debt.

The following table summarizes the Company’s long-term indebtedness and other financing outstanding:

 

 

---

 

 

 

(1)    Represents the holder’s earliest put date and the Company’s earliest redemption date. The contractual maturity for the New Notes is May 2027.

The Company may redeem all or part of the $8,121 aggregate principal amount of the New Notes for cash on or after May 20, 2014, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the New Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date. The holders of the New Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the New Notes for cash on May 15, 2014; May 15, 2017; and May 15, 2022 for a repurchase price equal to the principal amount of the New Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date. The holders of the New Notes are required to provide notice to the Company of their plan to redeem the New Notes at any time during the 30 days prior to May 15, 2014; May 15, 2017; and May 15, 2022.

(2)    The outstanding par represents the total par amount of the junior subordinated notes held by two separate VIE trusts. The Company does not consolidate these trusts. The Company holds $1,489 par value of these junior subordinated notes, comprised of $870 par value of junior subordinated notes related to Alesco Capital Trust I and $619 par value of junior subordinated notes related to Sunset Financial Statutory Trust I. These notes have a carrying value of $0. Therefore, the net par value held by third parties is $48,125.  

(3)    Comprised of 9% paid currently and 3% paid in kind. The subordinated note payable was fully repaid in June 2013. 

(4)    The Star Asia Manager note payable has no stated maturity date. See description of payment terms below. 

(5)    Represents the interest rate as of the last day of the reporting period. 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There were no material off balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2013. 

Contractual Obligations

The table below summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013 and the future periods in which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash. Our junior subordinated notes and subordinated notes payable are assumed to be repaid on their respective maturity dates. The New Notes are assumed to be repaid on May 15, 2014, which represents the earliest day that the holders of the New Notes may require us to repurchase the New Notes for cash. The Star Asia Manager note payable is assumed to be repaid on March 31, 2014. Excluded from the table are obligations that are short-term in nature, including trading liabilities and repurchase agreements. In addition, excluded from the table is an unrecognized tax benefit of $1,231 because we are unable, at this time, to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement. See note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in the 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about the unrecognized tax benefit.

 

 

 

(1)   Assumes the New Notes are repurchased on May 15, 2014. Interest includes amounts payable during the period the New Notes are outstanding at an annual rate of 10.50%.

(2)    The interest on the junior subordinated notes related to Alesco Capital Trust I is variable. The interest rate of 4.2731% (based on a 90-day LIBOR rate as of June 30, 2013 plus 4.00%) was used to compute the contractual interest payment in each period noted. The interest on the junior subordinated notes related to Sunset Financial Statutory Trust I is variable. The interest rate of

---

 

4.4231% (based on a 90-day LIBOR rate as of June 30, 2013 plus 4.15%) was used to compute the contractual interest payment in each period noted.

(3)    The interest on the Star Asia Manager note payable is variable. The interest rate of 3.0231% (based on a 90-day LIBOR rate as of the last day of the reporting period plus 2.75%) was used to compute the contractual interest payment in each period noted.

We believe that we will be able to continue to fund our current operations and meet our contractual obligations through a combination of existing cash resources and other sources of credit. Due to the uncertainties that exist in the economy, we cannot be certain that we will be able to replace existing financing or find sources of additional financing in the future.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following is a list of recent accounting pronouncements that we believe will have a continuing impact on our financial statements going forward.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date, which requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the following: (a) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors; and (b) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. Examples of obligations within the scope of this ASU include debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The guidance in this ASU also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the ASU’s scope that exist at the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year of adoption. An entity may elect to use hindsight for the comparative periods presented in the initial year of adoption (if it changed its accounting as a result of adopting the guidance) and shall disclose that fact. The use of hindsight would allow an entity to recognize, measure, and disclose obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the scope of this ASU in comparative periods using information available at adoption rather than requiring an entity to make judgments about what information it had in each of the prior periods to measure the obligation. Early adoption is permitted. We will adopt the provisions of ASU 2013-04 effective January 1, 2014 and are currently evaluating the effect of the adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

 

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity, which addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. When a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, the partial sale guidance in Section 830-30-40 still applies, specifically, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such an equity method investment. However, this treatment does not apply to an equity method investment that is not a foreign entity. In those instances, the cumulative translation adjustment is released into net income only if the partial sale represents a complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity that contains the equity method investment. Additionally, the amendments in this ASU clarify that the sale of an investment in a foreign entity includes both (1) events that result in the loss of a controlling financial interest in a foreign entity (that is, irrespective of any retained investment) and (2) events that result in an acquirer obtaining control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest immediately before the acquisition date (sometimes referred to as a step acquisition). Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon the occurrence of those events. For public entities, the ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. We will adopt the provisions of ASU 2013-05 effective January 1, 2014 and we do not expect that the adoption of the ASU will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or financial statement disclosures.

 

In June 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-08, Financial Services-Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements,  which changes the approach to the investment company assessment in Topic 946, clarifies the characteristics of an investment company, and provides comprehensive guidance for assessing whether an entity is an investment company. The amendments require an investment company to measure non-controlling ownership interests in other investment companies at fair value rather than using the equity method of accounting.  The amendments also require the following additional disclosures: (a) the fact that the entity is an investment company and is applying the guidance in Topic 946, (b) information about changes, if any, in an entity’s status as an investment company, and (c) information about financial support provided or

---

 

contractually required to be provided by an investment company to any of its investees.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for an entity’s interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. Earlier application is prohibited. We have investments in the equity securities of investment funds and other non-publicly traded entities that have the attributes of investment companies as currently described in FASB ASC 946-15-2.  We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2014, and are currently evaluating the effect of the adoption on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting policies are essential to understanding and interpreting the financial results reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements are summarized in note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended. Certain of those policies are considered to be particularly important to the presentation of our financial results because they require us to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates, and judgments on historical experience, current trends, and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates, and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no material changes to matters discussed under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended.

   

---

 

 

ITEM  3.        QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

All amounts in this section are in thousands unless otherwise noted.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of economic loss arising from the adverse impact of market changes to the market value of our trading and investment positions. Market risk is inherent to both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments, and accordingly, the scope of our market risk management procedures extends beyond derivatives to include all market risk sensitive financial instruments. For purposes of analyzing the components of market risk, we have broken out our investment portfolio into three broad categories, plus debt:

 

Fixed Income Securities: We hold, from time to time, the following securities: U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agency MBS, U.S government agency debt securities, CMOs, non-government MBS, corporate bonds, non-redeemable and redeemable preferred stock, municipal bonds, certificates of deposits, SBA loans, residential loans, whole loans, and unconsolidated investments in the middle and senior tiers of securitization entities and TruPS. We attempt to mitigate our exposure to market risk by entering into economic hedging transactions, which may include TBAs. The fixed income category can be broadly broken down into two subcategories: fixed rate and floating rate.

Floating rate securities are not in themselves particularly sensitive to interest rate risk. Because they generally accrue income at a variable rate, the movement in interest rates typically does not impact their fair value. Fluctuations in their current income due to variations in interest rates are generally not material to us. Floating rate fixed income securities are subject to other market risks such as: default risk of the underlying issuer, changes in issuer’s credit spreads, prepayment rates, investor demand and supply of securities within a particular asset class or industry class of the ultimate obligor. The sensitivity to any individual market risk can be difficult to quantify.

The fair value of fixed rate securities is sensitive to changes in interest rates. However, fixed rate securities that have low credit ratings or represent junior interests in securitizations are not particularly interest rate sensitive. In general, when we acquire interest rate sensitive securities, we enter into an offsetting short position for a similar fixed rate security. Alternatively, we may enter into other interest rate hedging arrangements such as interest rate swaps or EuroDollar futures. We measure our net interest rate sensitivity by determining how the fair value of our net interest rate sensitive assets would change as a result of a 100 basis points (“bps”) adverse shift across the entire yield curve. Based on this analysis, as of June 30, 2013, we would incur a loss of $5,173 if the yield curve rises 100 bps across all maturities and a gain of $5,172 if the yield curve falls 100 bps across all maturities.

Equity Securities: We hold equity interests in the form of investments in investment funds, permanent capital vehicles, and equity instruments of publicly traded companies. These investments are subject to equity price risk. Equity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of underlying equity prices, which affect the value of equity securities or instruments that in turn derive their value from a particular stock. We attempt to reduce the risk of loss inherent in our inventory of equity securities by closely monitoring those security positions. However, since we generally make investments in our investment funds and permanent capital vehicles in order to facilitate third party capital raising (and hence increase our AUM and asset management fees), we may be unwilling to sell these positions as compared to investments in unaffiliated third parties. We have one permanent capital vehicle investment that is denominated in Euros, an investment fund that is denominated in Japanese Yen, and another permanent capital vehicle that is denominated in U.S. Dollars, but for which the underlying net assets are primarily based in Japanese Yen. The fair values of these investments are subject to change as the spot foreign exchange rate between these currencies and the U.S. Dollar (our functional currency) fluctuates. We may, from time to time, enter into foreign exchange rate derivatives to hedge all or a portion of this risk. We measure our net equity price sensitivity and foreign currency sensitivity by determining how the net fair value of our equity price sensitive and foreign exchange sensitive assets would change as a result of a 10% adverse change in equity prices or foreign exchange rates. Based on this analysis, as of June 30, 2013, our equity price sensitivity was $2,796 and our foreign exchange currency sensitivity was $2,423.  

Other Securities: These investments are primarily made up of residual interests in securitization entities. The fair value of these investments will fluctuate over time based on a number of factors including, but not limited to: liquidity of the investment type, the credit performance of the individual assets and issuers within the securitization entity, the asset class of the securitization entity and the relative supply of and demand for investments within that asset class, credit spreads in general, the transparency of valuation of the assets and liabilities of the securitization entity, and investors’ view of the accuracy of ratings prepared by the independent rating agencies. The sensitivity to any individual market risk cannot be quantified.

Debt: In addition to the risks noted above, we incur interest rate risk related to our debt obligations. We have debt that accrues interest at either variable rates or fixed rates. As of June 30, 2013, a 100 bps change in the three month LIBOR would result in a

---

 

change in our annual cash paid for interest in the amount of $481. A 100 bps adverse change in the market yield to maturity would result in an increase in the fair value of the debt in the amount of $2,851 as of June 30, 2013.  

Counterparty Risk and Settlement Risk:

We are subject to counterparty risk primarily in two areas: our collateralized securities transactions described in note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and our TBA activities (where we enter into offsetting TBA trades in order to assist clients in hedging their mortgage portfolios) described in note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. With respect to the matched book repo financing activities, our risk is that the counterparty does not fulfill its obligation to repurchase the underlying security when it is due. In this case, we would typically liquidate the underlying security, which may result in a loss if the security has declined in value in relation to the balance due from the counterparty under the reverse repurchase agreement.

 

With respect to our TBA hedging activities, our risk is that the counterparty does not settle the TBA trade on the scheduled settlement date. In this case, we would have to execute the trade, which may result in a loss based on market movement in the value of the underlying trade between its initial trade date and its settlement date (which in the case of TBAs can be as long as 90 days). If we were to incur a loss under either of these activities, we have recourse to the counterparty pursuant to the underlying agreements.

Finally, we have general settlement risk in all of our regular way fixed income and equity trading activities. If a counterparty fails to settle a trade, we may incur a loss in closing out the position and would be forced to try to recover this loss from the counterparty. If the counterparty has become insolvent or does not have sufficient liquid assets to reimburse us for the loss, we may not get reimbursed.

How we manage these risks

Market Risk

We seek to manage our market risk by utilizing our underwriting and credit analysis processes that are performed in advance of acquiring any investment. In addition, we continually monitor our investments—trading and our trading securities sold, not yet purchased on a daily basis and our other investments on a monthly basis. We perform an in-depth monthly analysis on all our investments and our risk committee meets on a monthly basis to review specific issues within our portfolio and to make recommendations for dealing with these issues. In addition, each of our broker-dealers has an assigned chief risk officer that reviews the firm’s positions and trading activities on a daily basis.

Counterparty Risk

We seek to manage our counterparty risk through two major tools. First, we perform a credit assessment of each counterparty to ensure the counterparty has sufficient equity, liquidity, and profitability to support the level of trading or lending we plan to do with them. Second, we require counterparties to post cash or other liquid collateral (“margin”) in the case of changes in the market value of the underlying securities or trades on an ongoing basis.

In the case of collateralized securities financing transactions, we will generally lend less than the market value of the underlying security initially. The difference between the amount lent and the value of the security is referred to as the haircut. We will seek to maintain this haircut while the loan is outstanding. If the value of the security declines, we will require the counterparty to post margin to offset this decline. If the counterparty fails to post margin, we will sell the underlying security. The haircut serves as a buffer against market movements to prevent or minimize a loss.

 

In the case of TBA hedging, we also require counterparties to post margin with us in the case of the market value of the underlying TBA trade declining. If the counterparty fails to post margin, we will close out the underlying trade. In the case of TBA hedging, we will sometimes obtain initial margin or a cash deposit from the counterparty which serves a purpose similar to the haircut as an additional buffer against losses. However, some of our TBA hedging activities are done without initial margin or cash deposits.

       

---

 

 

ITEM  4.        CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company (and its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2013. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at June 30, 2013.  

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

   

---

 

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.         Legal Proceedings

Incorporated by reference to the headings titled “Legal and Regulatory Proceedings” in note 17 to the consolidated financial statements include in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item  1A.      Risk Factors

In addition to the information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should also carefully review and consider the risk factors contained in our other reports and periodic filings with the SEC, including without limitation the risk factors contained under the caption “Item 1A—Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The risk factors discussed in that Form 10-K do not identify all risks that we face because our business operations could also be affected by additional factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations. Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes in the significant factors that may affect our business and operations as described in “Item 1A—Risk Factors” of the Annual Report on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended.

The sale of our common stock and notes that are convertible to shares of common stock to Mead Park Capital and CBF may cause substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and the sale of the shares of common stock acquired (or shares issued upon the conversion of the notes purchased) by Mead Park Capital and CBF could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

On May 9, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Mead Park Capital and a securities purchase agreement with CBF which provide that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, Mead Park Capital and CBF are committed to purchase $3.9 million and $1.6 million of our common stock, respectively, as well as $5.8 million and $2.4 million of convertible notes, respectively.

In connection with the securities purchase agreement, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with Mead Park Capital and CBF, dated May 9, 2013, which provides, among other things, that the Company will register the resale of all shares acquired (or shares issued upon the conversion of the notes purchased) by Mead Park Capital or CBF under the applicable purchase agreement. Therefore, sales to Mead Park Capital and CBF by us pursuant to the applicable purchase agreement may result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock. The resale of such shares by Mead Park Capital or CBF could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales.

The proposed sale of common stock and convertible notes to Mead Park Capital and CBF is subject to certain closing conditions that, if not satisfied or waived, will result in the proposed sale not being completed. Failure to complete the proposed sale could negatively affect us.

The transactions contemplated by the securities purchase agreements with Mead Park Capital and CBF are subject to several conditions, including shareholder approvals. We cannot predict whether the closing conditions set forth in each of the securities purchase agreement will be satisfied, and the transactions may be delayed or even abandoned before completion if certain events occur. If any closing condition is not satisfied or, if permissible, waived, the transactions contemplated by the securities purchase agreements will not be completed.

If the transactions are not completed for any reason, we may be subject to a number of material risks, including the following:

•     we may not realize the benefits expected of the proposed relationship with Mead Park Capital, including Mead Park Capital’s access to capital, industry relationships, and experience;

•     clients and others may become uncertain about our future prospects in the absence of these transactions;

•     the market price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price of our stock reflects a market assumption that these transactions will be completed and that the related benefits will be realized, or as a result of the market’s perceptions that these transactions were not consummated due to an adverse change in our business;

•     some of the costs related to these transactions, such as legal, accounting and some financial advisory fees, must be paid even if these transactions are not completed; and

•     our business may suffer as a result of having had the focus of our management directed toward these transactions instead of our core business and other opportunities that might have been beneficial to us.

---

 

The realization of any of these risks by us may materially and adversely affect our business, financial results, financial condition and/or stock price.

Item  2.        Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

 

 

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company ceased to qualify as a REIT and, therefore, is not required to make any dividends or other distributions to its stockholders. However, the Company’s Board of Directors has the power to decide to increase, reduce, or eliminate dividends in the future. The Board of Director’s decision will depend on a variety of factors, including business, financial and regulatory considerations as well as any limitations under Maryland law or imposed by any agreements governing indebtedness of the Company. There can be no assurances that such dividends will be maintained or increased and, if maintained or increased, will not subsequently be discontinued.

Certain subsidiaries of the Operating LLC have restrictions on the withdrawal of capital and otherwise in making distributions and loans. CCPR and JVB are subject to net capital restrictions imposed by the SEC and FINRA that require certain minimum levels of net capital to remain in these subsidiaries. In addition, these restrictions could potentially impose notice requirements or limit our ability to withdraw capital above the required minimum amounts (excess capital) whether through distribution or loan. CCFL is regulated by the FCA in the United Kingdom and must maintain certain minimum levels of capital. See note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

---

 

 

Item  6.        Exhibits

 

 

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

---