Cohen & Co Inc. - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

OR

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                      

Commission file number: 001-32026

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 701-9555

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒ 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files,    Yes  ☒    No  ☐ 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☒ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒ 

As of  June 30, 2015, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $13.7 million.  

As of March 7, 2016, there were 14,003,862 shares of Common Stock outstanding. 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. 

 

---

 

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC. 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

---

 

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue,” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future, and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about the following subjects:

•benefits, results, costs reductions and synergies resulting from the Company’s business combinations;

•integration of operations;

•business strategies;

•growth opportunities;

•competitive position;

•market outlook;

•expected financial position;

•expected results of operations;

•future cash flows;

•financing plans;

•plans and objectives of management;

•tax treatment of the business combinations;

•fair value of assets; and

•any other statements regarding future growth, future cash needs, future operations, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.

These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You should consider the areas of risk and uncertainty described above and discussed under “Item 1A — Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially as a result of various factors, some of which are outside our control, including the following:

•a decline in general economic conditions or the global financial markets;

•losses caused by financial or other problems experienced by third parties;

•losses due to unidentified or unanticipated risks;

•losses (whether realized or unrealized) on our principal investments, including on our collateralized loan obligation investments:

•a lack of liquidity, i.e., ready access to funds for use in our businesses;

•the ability to attract and retain personnel;

•the ability to meet regulatory capital requirements administered by federal agencies;

•an inability to generate incremental income from acquired businesses;

•unanticipated market closures due to inclement weather or other disasters;

•the volume of trading in securities;

•the liquidity in capital markets;

•the credit-worthiness of our correspondents, trading counterparties and our banking and margin customers;

---

 

•the demand for investment banking services in Europe;

•competitive conditions in each of our business segments;

•the availability of borrowings under credit lines, credit agreements and credit facilities;

•the inability to close the previously announced sale of our European business;

•the potential misconduct or errors by our employees or by entities with whom we conduct business; and

•the potential for litigation and other regulatory liability.

 

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

---

 

Certain Terms Used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise noted or as the context otherwise requires: “IFMI” refers to Institutional Financial Markets, Inc., a Maryland corporation. The “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to IFMI and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis; “IFMI, LLC” (formerly Cohen Brothers, LLC) or the “Operating LLC” refer to IFMI, LLC, the main operating subsidiary of the Company; “Cohen Brothers” refers to the pre-merger Cohen Brothers, LLC and its subsidiaries; “AFN” refers to the pre-merger Alesco Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries; “Merger Agreement” refers to the Agreement and Plan of Merger among AFN Alesco Financial Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of AFN, which we refer to as the “Merger Sub,” and Cohen Brothers, dated as of February 20, 2009 and amended on June 1, 2009, August 20, 2009, and September 30, 2009; “Merger” refers to the December 16, 2009 closing of the merger of Merger Sub with and into Cohen Brothers pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, which resulted in Cohen Brothers becoming a majority owned subsidiary of the Company. When the term, “IFMI” is used, it is referring to the parent company itself, Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. “JVB Holdings” refers to JVB Financial Holdings, L.L.C.; “JVB” refers to JVB Financial Group, LLC, a broker dealer subsidiary; “CCFL” refers to Cohen & Company Financial Limited (formerly known as EuroDekania Management LTD), a subsidiary regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (formerly known as the Financial Services Authority) in the United Kingdom; “CCPRH” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge Holdings LP (formerly known as PrinceRidge Holdings LP) and its subsidiaries; “PrinceRidge GP” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge Partners LLC (formerly known as PrinceRidge Partners LLC); “PrinceRidge” refers to CCPRH together with PrinceRidge GP; and “CCPR” refers to C&Co/PrinceRidge LLC (formerly known as The PrinceRidge Group LLC), a broker dealer subsidiary.

On January 31, 2014, JVB merged into CCPR.  In connection with this merger CCPRH changed its name from C&Co/PrinceRidge Holdings LP to J.V.B. Financial Group Holdings and CCPR changed its name from C&Co/PrinceRidge LLC to J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC.  Also, beginning on January 31, 2014, CCPR began to do business under the JVB brand.  Therefore, when we are discussing the operations of CCPR on or subsequent to January 31, 2014, we refer to it as JVB. 

“Securities Act” refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; and “Exchange Act” refers to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or “U.S. GAAP,” the Merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, Cohen Brothers was deemed to be the accounting acquirer and all of AFN’s assets and liabilities were required to be revalued at fair value as of the acquisition date. Therefore, any financial information reported herein prior to the Merger is the historical financial information of Cohen Brothers. As used throughout this filing, the terms, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the operations of Cohen Brothers and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to December 17, 2009 and the combined operations of the merged company and its consolidated subsidiaries from December 17, 2009 forward. AFN refers to the historical operations of Alesco Financial Inc. through to December 16, 2009, the date of the Merger, or the “Merger Date.” 

---

 

PART I

ITEM  1.BUSINESS.

INFORMATION REGARDING INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

Overview

 

We are a financial services company specializing in fixed income markets. We were founded in 1999 as an investment firm focused on small-cap banking institutions, but have grown to provide an expanding range of capital markets and asset management services. Our business segments are Capital Markets, Principal Investing, and Asset Management. Our Capital Markets business segment consists of fixed income sales, trading, and financing as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products and advisory services, operating primarily through our subsidiaries, JVB in the United States and CCFL in Europe. In January 2014 the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) approved the consolidation of our two domestic broker-dealer subsidiaries, CCPR and JVB, into a single broker-dealer subsidiary, which resulted in one broker-dealer subsidiary in the United States operating as JVB. Our Principal Investing business segment historically was comprised primarily of our investments in the investment vehicles we managed. In 2014, our Principal Investing segment invested available capital outside of the investment vehicles that we manage, which consisted primarily of investments in collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”). These investments in CLOs were marked down significantly in 2015 but continue to make routine distributions. We intend to continue to hold these investments but have made no new investments in CLO positions since July 2014. Our Asset Management business segment manages assets through investment vehicles, such as collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), permanent capital vehicles, managed accounts, and investment funds. As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately $3.91 billion of assets under management (“AUM”) in fixed income assets in a variety of asset classes including United States and European bank and insurance trust preferred securities (“TruPS”) and European corporate loans. Almost all of our AUM, 95.8%, was in CDOs we manage, which were all securitized prior to 2008.

 

On August 19, 2014, we entered into a definitive agreement (the “European Sale Agreement”) to sell our European operations to C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC, an entity controlled by Daniel G. Cohen, president and chief executive of our European operations and vice chairman of our board of directors, for approximately $8.7 million. The transaction was subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approval from the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). On March 26, 2015, the parties to the European Sale Agreement agreed to extend the deadline for the closing of the transactions contemplated by the European Sale Agreement from March 31, 2015 to June 30, 2015. In addition, the parties to the European Sale Agreement amended the date which C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC was obligated to cause the settlement of intercompany accounts of CCFL and our subsidiaries, Cohen & Compagnie, SAS and Unicum Capital, S.L., owed to the Operating LLC (the “Intercompany Payables”) from March 31, 2015 to June 30, 2015. 

Further, on June 30, 2015, the parties to the European Sale Agreement agreed to extend the deadline for the closing from June 30, 2015 to December 31, 2015 and the settlement date of the Intercompany Payables from June 30, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Second Extension”).  In connection with the Second Extension, the parties to the European Sale Agreement agreed that, if the transaction was terminated in accordance with its terms prior to the closing, then (i) Mr. Cohen would pay $0.6 million in respect of a portion of the legal and financial advisory fees and expenses incurred by us and the special committee of our board of directors in connection with the transaction since April 1, 2014 and (ii) an amendment (the “Employment Agreement Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2013, among the Operating LLC, the Company, Mr. Cohen and J.V.B. Financial Group Holdings, LP (formerly known as C&Co/PrinceRidge Holdings LP) (the “Employment Agreement”), would become effective. The Cohen Employment Agreement Amendment would provide that if Mr. Cohen’s employment was terminated by the Operating LLC without cause or by Mr. Cohen for good reason (as such terms are defined in the Cohen Employment Agreement), the Operating LLC would pay Mr. Cohen a maximum of $1 million as a severance benefit. The Cohen Employment Agreement currently provides that, in the event of such termination, the Operating LLC will pay Mr. Cohen a minimum of $3 million as a severance benefit.

The European Sale Agreement provides that either party may terminate the agreement after December 31, 2015. On February 18, 2016, C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC provided notice to the Operating LLC that it continues to evaluate the transaction. To date, neither party has terminated the European Sale Agreement, and the Company and the Operating LLC continue to evaluate the transaction.

Financial information concerning our business segments is set forth in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 41 and note 27 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For more information regarding our geographic locations, see Item. 2 Properties, below, and note 27 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

 

Capital Markets

Our Capital Markets business segment consists primarily of fixed income sales, trading, and financing as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products and advisory services operated through our subsidiaries, JVB in the United States and CCFL in Europe. At the beginning of 2011, we closed our acquisition of JVB Holdings, the parent company of JVB, a Boca Raton, Florida-based fixed income broker-dealer that specializes in small size transactions in certificates of deposit (“CDs”), corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), structured products, municipal securities, and U.S. government agency securities primarily within the dealer market. In May 2011, we contributed a substantial part of our non-JVB Capital Markets business segment to PrinceRidge, CCPR’s parent company, in exchange for an approximate 70% ownership interest in PrinceRidge, a New York-based financial services firm comprised of an investment banking group and a sales and trading group. During 2012 and 2013, our ownership interest in PrinceRidge increased to 100% with the repurchase of all of PrinceRidge’s minority partner ownership interests therein. Through the acquisitions of JVB and PrinceRidge, we acquired complementary businesses. In the later part of 2013, we made the decision to combine CCPR and JVB into one broker-dealer. The combination was completed in January 2014. As a result, our combined broker-dealer subsidiary in the United States now operates under the JVB brand. 

Historically, our Capital Markets business segment has included the following U.S. broker-dealers: Cohen & Company Securities, LLC (“CCS”), Cohen & Company Capital Markets, LLC (“CCCM”), CCPR, and JVB. We acquired CCCM (formerly known as Fairfax, LLC) in 2010 primarily to avail ourselves of an existing clearing relationship. In May 2011, CCCM became a wholly-owned subsidiary of PrinceRidge and in February 2012, PrinceRidge merged CCCM into CCPR. CCPR operated under our PrinceRidge subsidiary until the merger with JVB became effective in January 2014. JVB operates under our JVB Holdings subsidiary. CCS was our legacy broker-dealer that was registered under the Exchange Act and was a member of FINRA and the Securities Industry Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) until it filed a Form BDW in September 2012 seeking to withdraw all of its registrations with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and from each jurisdiction in which it was licensed or registered as a securities broker-dealer, as well as its membership in FINRA, the NASDAQ Stock Market, and the International Securities Exchange. CCS’ withdrawal from all such regulatory authorities became effective in November 2012. CCS has conducted no securities-related business activities since May 2011. Currently, JVB is our sole operating U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary. In addition, our European subsidiary, CCFL, is regulated by the FCA in the United Kingdom.

 

Our fixed income sales and trading group provides trade execution to corporate investors, institutional investors, and other smaller broker-dealers. We specialize in a variety of products, including but not limited to: corporate bonds and loans, asset-backed securities (“ABS”), MBS, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), CDOs, CLOs, collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), municipal securities, Small Business Administration loans (“SBA loans”), U.S. government bonds, U.S. government agency securities, brokered deposits and CDs for small banks and, hybrid capital of financial institutions including TruPS, whole loans, and other structured financial instruments. We had offered execution and brokerage services for equity derivative products until December 31, 2012, when we sold our equity derivatives brokerage business to a new entity owned by two of our former employees.

In addition, JVB has a funding desk that acts as an intermediary between borrowers and lenders of short-term funds and provides funding for various inventory positions through the use of repurchase agreements. In 2012, a trading desk for “to-be-announced” securities (“TBAs”) was established. TBAs are forward mortgage-backed securities whose collateral remain unknown until just prior to the trade settlement. The forward collateral types are exclusively issued by United States government agencies, such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), and the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”). The objective of the TBA business is to provide liquidity to institutional mortgage originators who hedge their mortgage pipelines. In addition to providing credit for MBS trading lines, JVB offers execution services, trading of specified pools, and financing for qualified originators. The TBA desk offers a wide range of solutions for institutional clients seeking to enhance mortgage pipeline execution and overall portfolio profitability.

We have been in the Capital Markets business since our inception. Our Capital Markets business segment has transformed over time in response to market opportunities and the needs of our clients. The initial focus was on sales and trading of listed equities of small financial companies with a particular emphasis on bank stocks. Early on, a market opportunity arose for participation in a particular segment of the debt market, the securitization of TruPS. We began assisting small banks in the issuance of TruPS through securitized pools. These investment vehicles were structured and underwritten by large investment banks while our broker-dealer typically participated as a co-placement agent or selling group member. We also participated in the secondary market trading of these securities between institutional clients.

In early 2008, our management team made the strategic decision to restructure our Capital Markets business model from exclusively focusing on TruPS and structured credit products to a more traditional fixed income broker-dealer platform with more diversified revenue streams primarily from trading activity. In the ensuing years, we have hired many sales and trading professionals with expertise in areas that complement our core competency in structured credit. In 2011, our acquisitions of JVB and PrinceRidge further expanded our Capital Markets platform. As a result of these acquisitions, offset by subsequent downsizings, our Capital Markets staffing increased from six sales and trading professionals at the beginning of 2008, to over 230 professionals in mid-2011, and decreased to approximately 65 professionals as of December 31, 2015. We continue to explore opportunities to add

---

 

complementary distribution channels, hire experienced talent, expand our presence across asset classes, and bolster the service capabilities of our Capital Markets business segment.

Our Capital Markets business segment generates revenue through the following activities: (1) trading activities, which include execution and brokerage services, securities lending activities, riskless trading activities as well as gains and losses (unrealized and realized), and income and expense earned on securities classified as trading, and (2) new issue and advisory revenue comprised of (a) origination fees for newly created financial instruments originated by us, (b) revenue from advisory services, and (c) new issue revenue associated with arranging and placing the issuance of newly created financial instruments. Our Capital Markets business segment has offices in Boca Raton, Charlotte, Cold Spring Harbor (New York), Hunt Valley (Maryland), London, New York, Paris, and Philadelphia.

Trades in our Capital Markets business segment can be either “riskless” or risk-based. “Riskless trades” are transacted with a customer order in hand, resulting in limited risk to us. “Risk-based trades” involve us owning the securities and thus placing our capital at risk. Such risk-based trading activity may include the use of leverage. In recent years, we began to utilize more leverage in our Capital Markets business segment. We believe that the prudent use of capital to facilitate client orders increases trading volume and profitability. Any gains or losses on trading securities that we have purchased in the secondary market are recorded in our Capital Markets business segment, whereas any gains or losses on securities that we retained in our sponsored investment vehicles or other principal investments are recorded in our Principal Investing business segment.

During the first quarter of 2014, we stopped providing investment banking and advisory services in the United States as a result of the loss of certain of JVB’s former employees. Currently, JVB’s primary source of new issue revenue is our SBA group’s participation in COOF Securitizations, defined as SBA Confirmation of Originator Fee Certificates (“COOF”). The SBA secondary market program allows for the purchaser of a SBA loan certificate to “strip” a portion of the interest rate from a guaranteed loan portion, creating what is called an originator fee or interest only strip. This enhances the ability of SBA pool assemblers to securitize the guaranteed portion of loans that do not have the same interest rate. Our SBA group’s participation in this area has grown over recent years.

Principal Investing

Our Principal Investing business segment has historically been comprised of investments in the investment vehicles we manage, as well as investments in certain other structured products, and the related gains and losses that they generate. After the sale of our interests in the Star Asia Finance, Limited (“Star Asia”), Star Asia Management Ltd. (“Star Asia Manager”), Star Asia Japan Special Situations LP (the “Star Asia Special Situations Fund”), Star Asia Advisors, Ltd. (“SAA Manager”), Star Asia Partners Ltd. (“SAP GP”), and Star Asia Capital Management, LLC (“Star Asia Capital Management” and together with Star, Asia, Star Asia Manager, Star Asia Special Situations Fund, SAA Manager, and SAP GP, the “Star Asia Group”) in February 2014, we refocused our Principal Investing portfolio on products that we do not manage, which has consisted primarily of investments in CLO securities. During 2014, we made investments in ten separate CLOs that were not sponsored by us. During 2014 and 2015, we sold three of these CLO investments. These investments in CLOs were marked down significantly in 2015 but continue to make routine distributions. We intend to continue to hold these investments but have made no any new investments in CLO positions since July 2014. As of December 31, 2015, our Principal Investing portfolio was valued at $14.9 million and included investments in seven CLOs (valued at $11.6 million), EuroDekania (Cayman) Ltd. (“EuroDekania”) (valued at $2.5 million), Tiptree Financial Inc. (“Tiptree”) (valued at $0.4 million), and other securities (valued at $0.5 million). 

A description of our Principal Investments as of December 31, 2015 is set forth below.

Investments in CLO Securities. After the sale of our interests in the Star Asia Group, we refocused our Principal Investing portfolio on products that we do not manage, which has consisted primarily of investments in CLO securities. Our focus on CLO investments capitalizes on our strengths in structured credit and leveraged finance. During 2014, we made investments in ten separate CLOs that were not sponsored by us, which aggregated to over $25 million. Each of our 2014 purchases of CLO securities ranged in size from approximately $1.75 million to $3.0 million. Of these ten CLO investments, nine represented investments in equity, the most junior tranche of the CLO. We sold one of the CLO investments for a small gain during 2014 and we sold two of the CLO investments for a small loss during 2015. The value of these investments is impacted by the performance of the underlying loans in these CLOs as well as the overall CLO market. During 2015, we recorded $1.5 million of investment losses on our investments in these CLO securities. As of December 31, 2015, our investments in seven CLO securities had approximately $11.6 million in fair value. We intend to continue to hold these investments but have made no new investments in CLO positions since July 2014.

EuroDekania. EuroDekania is a Cayman Islands exempted company that is externally managed by CCFL.  EuroDekania has invested in hybrid capital securities of European banks and insurance companies, CMBS, RMBS, and widely syndicated leverage loans. We made an initial investment of €5.3 million in EuroDekania in its initial private offering of securities in March 2007. In August 2010, May 2011, June 2011, November 2012, December 2013, and December 2015, we purchased an additional $0.3 million, $0.4 million, $0.1 million, $15 thousand, $1.0 million, and $0.1 million, respectively, in secondary trades. In addition to changes in the net asset value (“NAV”) of the entity, the value of our investment is impacted by changes in the U.S. dollar-Euro currency exchange rate due to the fact that our investment in EuroDekania is denominated in Euros. During 2014, we put in place Euro-based foreign currency forward contracts to partially hedge fluctuations in the investment value of EuroDekania. As December 31, 2015, we

---

 

had outstanding Euro-based foreign currency forward contracts with a notional amount of 2.75 million Euros. We recorded $0.4 million of investment gains related to our investment in these forward contracts during 2015. During 2015, we recorded $12 thousand of investment losses on our investment in EuroDekania. As of December 31, 2015, we owned approximately 17% of EuroDekania, and our 2.7 million shares of EuroDekania were valued at $2.5 million.

 

MFCA/Tiptree. Muni Funding Company of America, LLC (“MFCA”) was a Delaware limited liability company that we managed until March 18, 2009, when we assigned our management agreement with MFCA to a third party. MFCA primarily invested in securities exempt from United States federal income taxes directly or through structured tax-exempt pass-through vehicles, which are similar in nature to CDOs, as well as other structured credit entities. MFCA began operations in June 2007 when it raised approximately $159 million of net proceeds from a private offering of securities, of which we invested $5.0 million. In June 2009, MFCA completed a rights offering in which we invested $0.6 million. In June 2011, MFCA was merged into Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P., and our investment in MFCA was converted into an interest in Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P. In mid-2013, Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P. completed a transaction with its publicly-traded, majority-owned subsidiary, Care Investment Trust Inc., which combined their businesses into a single operating company. In connection with the closing of this transaction, the company, formerly known as Care Investment Trust Inc., changed its name to “Tiptree Financial Inc.”  Tiptree Financial Inc. (“Tiptree”) (NASDAQ: TIPT), a Maryland corporation, is a diversified financial services holding company that was organized in 2007 and primarily focuses on the acquisition of majority control equity interests in financial services businesses. During the third quarter of 2014, we exchanged the units we held in Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P. into 310,950 shares of Tiptree Financial, Inc.

As of December 31, 2015, we owned 57,544 shares of Tiptree that were valued at $0.4 million. During 2015, we sold a significant portion of our Tiptree investment and recorded $0.4 million of investment losses on our investment in Tiptree.

Other Securities. We have invested in various original issuance securities of the deals we have sponsored and certain other deals that we have not sponsored. We have also received options or warrants in publicly traded securities as payment for certain investment banking services that we have provided. During 2015, we recorded $0.1 million of investment gains on these other legacy securities. As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately $0.5 million in fair value of these other legacy securities.

Asset Management

Our Asset Management business segment has managed assets within a variety of investment vehicles, including CDOs, permanent capital vehicles, managed accounts, and investment funds. We earn management fees for our ongoing asset management services provided to these investment vehicles, which may include fees both senior and subordinate to the securities issued by the investment vehicles. Management fees are based on the value of the AUM or the investment performance of the vehicle, or both. As of December 31, 2015, we had $3.9 billion in AUM, of which 95.8% was in CDOs we manage.

Our AUM increased from $965.8 million at December 31, 2003, to $3.9 billion at December 31, 2015, but has declined year-to-year since 2007. AUM refers to assets under management, and equals the sum of: (1) the gross assets included in the CDOs that we have sponsored and/or manage; plus (2) the NAV of the permanent capital vehicles and investment funds we manage; plus (3) the NAV of other managed accounts. Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers and, as a result, this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. This definition of AUM is not necessarily identical to any definition of AUM that may be used in our management agreements.

Currently, almost all of our AUM is in CDOs that we manage. A CDO is a form of secured borrowing. The borrowing is secured by different types of fixed income assets such as corporate or mortgage loans or bonds. The borrowing is in the form of a securitization, which means that the lenders are actually investing in notes secured by the assets. In the event of a default, the lender will have recourse only to the assets securing the loan. We have originated assets for, served as co-placement agent for, and continue to manage this type of investment vehicle, which is generally structured as a trust or other special purpose vehicle. In addition, we invested in some of the debt and equity securities initially issued by certain CDOs, gains and losses of which recorded in our Principal Investing business segment.

These structures can hold different types of securities. Historically, we focused on the following asset classes: (1) United States and European bank and insurance TruPS and subordinated debt; (2) United States ABS, such as MBS and commercial real estate loans; (3) United States and European corporate loans; and (4) United States obligations of non-profit entities.

The credit crisis caused available liquidity, particularly through CDOs and other types of securitizations, to decline precipitously. Our ability to accumulate assets for securitization effectively ended with the market disruption. We securitized $14.8 billion of assets in 16 trusts during 2006; $17.8 billion of assets in 16 trusts during 2007; $400 million of assets in one trust during 2008; and zero assets in zero trusts during 2009 through 2015. 

We generate asset management revenue for our services as asset manager. Many of our sponsored CDOs, particularly those where the assets are bank TruPS and ABS, have experienced asset deferrals, defaults, and rating agency downgrades that reduce our management fees. In 16 out of 19 of our ABS deals, the extent of the deferrals, defaults, and downgrades caused credit-related coverage tests to trigger an event of default. Under an event of default, the senior debt holders in the structure can generally force a liquidation of the entity. To date, 15 of our ABS structures have been liquidated following an event of default, and we transferred the collateral management agreements of another five ABS deals to unrelated third parties, leaving us with no ABS structures under

---

 

management. In addition, many of the CDOs we manage have experienced high enough levels of deferrals, defaults, and downgrades to reduce our subordinated management fees to zero. In a typical structure, any failure of a covenant coverage test redirects cash flow to pay down the senior debt until compliance is restored. If compliance is eventually restored, the entity will resume paying subordinated management fees to us, including those that accrued but remained unpaid during the period of non-compliance.

 

As of December 31, 2015, we had three subsidiaries that act as collateral managers and investment advisors to the CDOs that we manage. With the exception of CCFL, these entities are registered investment advisors under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Investment Advisers Act”). CCFL is regulated by the FCA.

 

---

 

The chart below shows changes in our AUM by product line for the last five years.

 

 

 

 

(1)On July 29, 2010, we completed the sale of our Alesco X-XVII contracts to an unrelated third party. For more information see “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 41. During 2014, we entered into a sub-advisory agreement to employ Mead Park Advisors, LLC to render advice and assistance with respect to collateral management services to the Alesco portfolios.  See note 29 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)During 2014, the two Dekania U.S. deals liquidated after successful auctions.

(3)Dekania Europe and Munda portfolios are denominated in Euros. For purposes of the table above they have been converted to U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rates at the points in time presented.

(4)During the third quarter of 2012, we resigned as asset manager of the Xenon deal and agreed to forego certain collateral manager rights that were unique to this CDO, related to the auction provisions.

(5)On March 29, 2011, we completed the sale of our investment advisory agreements relating to a series of closed-end distressed debt funds, known as the Deep Value funds, and certain separately managed accounts to a new entity owned by two of our former employees, known as Strategos Capital Management, LLC (“Strategos”). At the same time, we changed the name of our wholly owned subsidiary that previously served as the investment advisor from Strategos Capital Management, LLC to Cira SCM, LLC (“Cira SCM”). In connection with the transaction, we entered into a sub-advisory agreement to employ Strategos Capital Management, LLC to render advice and assistance with respect to collateral management services to the Kleros and Libertas portfolios, which was terminated during 2014.

(6)During 2013 and 2014, we resigned as collateral manager of three of the Kleros deals and two of the Libertas deals. For the Kleros deals, our resignations were effective in August 2013, June 2014, and July 2014. For the Libertas deals, our resignations were effective in February 2014 and June 2014.

(7)Prior to August 2012, we served only as the junior manager of the Munda CLO and we shared the management fees equally with the lead manager. In August 2012, we became lead manager (and remained as junior manager). Subsequent to becoming the lead manager, we earn all of the management fees related to the Munda CLO.

(8)In February 2014, we announced the completion of the sale of our ownership interests in the Star Asia Group, which accounted for $282 million of our AUM as of December 31, 2013.

A description of our CDO product lines that were under management as of December 31, 2015 is set forth below.

Alesco and Dekania. As of December 31, 2015, we managed nine Alesco deals and three Dekania Europe deals, which were initially securitized during 2003 to 2007. Cohen & Company Financial Management, LLC manages our Alesco platform. Dekania Capital Management, LLC manages the first two Dekania Europe deals that were issued. CCFL manages the third Dekania Europe deal that was issued. During 2014, the two Dekania U.S. deals, which were managed by Dekania Capital Management, LLC, were liquidated after successful auctions. During 2014, we entered into a sub-advisory agreement to employ Mead Park Advisors, LLC to render advice and assistance with respect to collateral management services to the Alesco portfolios.

In general, our Alesco and Dekania Europe deals have the following terms. We receive senior and subordinate management fees, and there is a potential for incentive fees on certain deals if equity internal rates of return are greater than 15%. We can be removed as manager without cause if 66.7% of the rated note holders voting separately by class and 66.7% of the equity holders vote to remove us, or if 75% of the most senior note holders vote to remove us when certain over-collateralization ratios fall below 100%. We can be removed as manager for cause if a majority of the controlling class of note holders or a majority of equity holders vote to remove us. “Cause” includes unremedied violations of the collateral management agreement or indenture, defaults attributable to

---

 

certain actions of the manager, misrepresentations or fraud, criminal activity, bankruptcy, insolvency or dissolution. There is a non-call period for the equity holders, which ranges from three to six years. Once this non-call period expires, a majority of the equity holders can trigger an optional redemption as long as the liquidation of the collateral generates sufficient proceeds to pay all principal and accrued interest on the rated notes and all expenses. In ten years from closing, an auction call will be triggered if the rated notes have not been redeemed in full. In an auction call redemption, an appointee will conduct an auction of the collateral, which will only be executed if the highest bid results in sufficient proceeds to pay all principal and accrued interest on the rated notes and all expenses. If the auction is not successfully completed, all residual interest that would normally be distributed to equity holders will be sequentially applied to reduce the principal of the rated notes. Any failure of an over-collateralization coverage test redirects interest to paying down notes until compliance is restored. The securities mature up to 30 years from closing. An event of default will occur if certain over-collateralization ratios drop below 100%. While an event of default exists, a majority of the senior note holders can declare the principal and accrued and unpaid interest immediately due and payable. All of the Alesco CDOs we manage have reached their auction call redemption features which means the portfolio of collateral for each CDO is subject to an auction on either a quarterly or bi-annual basis. If an auction is successful, the management contract related to such CDO will be terminated in connection with the liquidation of the CDO and we will lose the related management fees.

Munda. CCFL acts as lead and junior investment manager to the Munda CLO, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands. In September 2012, CCFL assumed the lead investment management role from a large European bank. Munda CLO is comprised of broadly syndicated corporate loans primarily of European companies. Munda CLO was initially securitized in December 2007.

In general, Munda CLO has the following terms. We receive senior and subordinate management fees, and there is no potential to earn incentive fees. We cannot be removed as investment manager without cause. We can be removed as investment manager for cause if 66.7% of the senior note holders and 66.7% of the equity holders vote to remove us. Cause includes unremedied violations of the collateral management agreement or trust deed, breach of the collateral management agreement that is not cured within 30-60 days, misrepresentations or fraud, criminal activity, bankruptcy, insolvency or dissolution, and certain key man provisions. There is a six year reinvestment period after closing during which the manager may sell and purchase collateral for the deal. After the last day of the reinvestment period, collateral principal collections will be applied to pay down the notes sequentially. There is a three year non-call period for the equity holders. Once this non-call period is over, a majority of the equity holders can trigger an optional redemption as long as the liquidation of collateral generates sufficient proceeds to cover all principal and accrued interest on the rated notes and all expenses. Any failure of over-collateralization coverage tests redirects interest to pay down notes until compliance is restored. Any failure of interest diversion tests during the reinvestment period redirects interest to purchasing collateral until compliance is restored. The maturity of the securities is 17 years from closing. An event of default will occur if certain over-collateralization ratios drop below 100%. While an event of default exists, a majority of the senior note holders can declare the principal and accrued and unpaid interest immediately due and payable.

A description of our other investment vehicles that were under management as of December 31, 2015 is set forth below.

 

EuroDekania.  EuroDekania is a Cayman Islands exempted company that is externally managed by CCFL. In December 2013, as a cost savings measure, EuroDekania was restructured from a Guernsey closed end fund to a Cayman Islands exempted company. CCFL is entitled to receive an annual management fee of 0.50% of the gross equity of EuroDekania. This management fee is reduced, but not below zero, by EuroDekania’s proportionate share of the amount of any CDO collateral management fees that are paid to CCFL and its affiliates in connection with EuroDekania’s investment in CDOs managed by CCFL based on the percentage of equity EuroDekania holds in such CDOs. CCFL has not received any management fee since 2008, when EuroDekania invested in Munda CLO. Currently, EuroDekania is not making new investments, and has no plans to make new investments. As cash is received from current investments, it has been returned to EuroDekania’s shareholders.

 

EuroDekania has invested in hybrid capital securities of European banks and insurance companies, CMBS, RMBS, and widely syndicated leverage loans. EuroDekania’s investments are denominated in Euros or British Pounds. EuroDekania began operations in March 2007 when it raised approximately €218 million in net proceeds from a private offering of securities, of which we invested €5.3 million. In addition, we made follow-on investments in EuroDekania through secondary trades of $0.3 million in August 2010, $0.4 million in May 2011, $0.1 million in June 2011, $15 thousand in November 2012, $1.0 million in December 2013, and $0.1 million in December 2015.

As of December 31, 2015, we owned approximately 17% of EuroDekania’s outstanding shares, which were valued at $2.5 million. At December 31, 2015, EuroDekania had an estimated NAV of $15.0 million.

Managed Accounts.  We provide investment management services to a number of separately managed accounts. Part of our European CDO team has transitioned to providing investment management services primarily to European family offices, high net worth individuals, and asset managers. The investment focus is on CDO notes and debt instruments where the investment managers have relevant expertise. For these services, we are paid gross annual base management fees of approximately 1.5% plus a gross annual performance fee of 20% of cash-on-cash returns in excess of an 8% hurdle. There is also an early redemption fee if any of the clients

---

 

were to terminate their arrangement within the first five years of the relationship. AUM of these European managed accounts was $10.9 million at December 31, 2015.

PriDe Fund.  In July 2014, CCFL became the investment advisor of a newly created French investment fund with total commitments of €238 million (the “PriDe Fund”). The PriDe Fund earns investment returns by investing in a diversified portfolio of debt securities issued by small and medium sized European insurance companies. The PriDe Fund has an initial investment period of two years and a maturity date of July 2026. CCFL earns management fees and performance fees if returns exceed certain thresholds. We have not made an investment, nor do we expect to make any investment, in the PriDe Fund. AUM of the PriDe Fund was $155.0 million at December 31, 2015.

In addition, we receive revenue shares from certain asset management businesses that we initially sponsored or owned, and subsequently sold or spun-off. A description of our material asset management revenue shares as of December 31, 2015 is set forth below.

Star Asia. On February 20, 2014, we completed the sale of all of our ownership interests in the Star Asia Group.  As part of our consideration for the sale of the Star Asia Group, we receive contingent payments equal to 15% of certain revenues generated by Star Asia Manager, SAA Manager, SAP GP, Star Asia Capital Management, and certain affiliated entities for a period of at least four years. The Star Asia revenue share arrangement terminates the later of (i) January 2018 and (ii) the date certain incentive fees are paid. In 2015, we earned $2.2 million from the Star Asia revenue share.

 

Alesco X-XVII. On July 29, 2010, we entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party whereby we sold the management rights and responsibilities related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations. As part of the agreement, we will continue to receive certain incentive payments through February 2017 if the management fees earned by the third party exceed certain thresholds. The incentive payments are paid quarterly and 25% of the total amount due is subject to a hold-back that will be paid at the end of the term in February 2017.  In 2015, we earned $0.8 million from the Alesco X-XVII revenue share, and; as of December 31, 2015, the hold-back amount was $1.3 million. 

Infrastructure Finance Business. On March 12, 2012, we entered into an agreement with unrelated third parties whereby we agreed to assist in the establishment of an international infrastructure finance business (“Infrastructure Finance Business”). As consideration for our assistance in establishing the Infrastructure Finance Business, we receive 8.0% of certain revenues of the manager of the Infrastructure Finance Business. The Infrastructure Finance Business revenue share arrangement expires when we have earned a cumulative $20 million in revenue share payments or with the dissolution of the Infrastructure Finance Business’ management company.  Also, in any particular year, the revenue share earned by us cannot exceed $2.0 million.  In 2015, we earned $0.4 million from the Infrastructure Finance Business revenue share.  From inception through 2015, we earned $0.8 million and have received $0.5 million in cash.  In addition, in March 2012, we issued 500,000 restricted units of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) to the managing member of the Infrastructure Finance Business, which vest 1/3 when we receive $6.0 million of cumulative revenue share payments, 1/3 when we receive $12.0 million of cumulative revenue share payments, and 1/3 when we receive $18.0 million of cumulative revenue share payments. In certain circumstances, we retain the right to deliver fixed amounts of cash to the managing member of the Infrastructure Finance Business as opposed to vested shares of Common Stock. See note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

Employees

As of December 31, 2015, we employed a total of 87 full time professionals and support staff. This number includes 58 employees of our JVB subsidiary, 7 employees of our European Capital Markets business segment, 1 employee of our U.S. Asset Management business segment, 6 employees of our European Asset Management business segment, 11 employees of our U.S. support services group, and 4 employees of our European support services group. We consider our employee relations to be good and believe that our compensation and employee benefits are competitive with those offered by other financial services firms. None of our employees is subject to any collective bargaining agreements. Our core asset is our professionals, their intellectual capital, and their dedication to providing the highest quality services to our clients. Prior to joining us, members of our management team held positions with other leading financial services firms, accounting firms, law firms, investment firms, or other public companies. Lester R. Brafman and Joseph W. Pooler, Jr. are our executive operating officers, and biographical information relating to each of these officers is incorporated by reference in “Part III — Item 10 — Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” to the Company’s Proxy Statement, to be filed in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

Competition

All areas of our business are intensely competitive and we expect them to remain so. We believe that the principal factors affecting competition in our business include economic environment, quality and price of our products and services, client relationships, reputation, market focus, and the ability of our professionals.

Our competitors are other public and private asset managers, investment banks, brokerage firms, merchant banks, and financial advisory firms. We compete globally and on a regional, product or niche basis. Many of our competitors have substantially greater

---

 

capital and resources than we do and offer a broader range of financial products and services. Certain of these competitors continue to raise additional amounts of capital to pursue business strategies that may be similar to ours. Some of these competitors may also have access to liquidity sources that are not available to us, which may pose challenges for us with respect to investment opportunities. In addition, some of these competitors may have higher risk tolerances or make different risk assessments than we do, allowing them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish broader business relationships.

In recent years, there has been substantial consolidation and convergence among companies in the financial services industry, including among many of our former competitors. In particular, a number of large commercial banks have established or acquired broker-dealers or have merged with other financial institutions. Many of these firms have the ability to offer a wider range of products than we offer, including loans, deposit taking, and insurance. Many of these firms also have investment banking services, which may enhance their competitive position. They also have the ability to support investment banking and securities products with commercial banking and other financial services revenue in an effort to gain market share, which could result in pricing pressure in our business. This trend toward consolidation and convergence has significantly increased the capital base and geographic reach of our competitors.

Competition is intense for the recruitment and retention of experienced and qualified professionals. The success of our business and our ability to continue to compete effectively will depend significantly upon our continued ability to retain and motivate our existing professionals and attract new professionals. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors” beginning on page 17.  

Regulation

Certain of our subsidiaries, in the ordinary course of their business, are subject to extensive regulation by government and self-regulatory organizations both in the United States and abroad. As a matter of public policy, these regulatory bodies are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of the securities and other financial markets. The regulations promulgated by these regulatory bodies are designed primarily to protect the interests of the investing public generally and thus cannot be expected to protect or further the interests of our company or our stockholders and may have the effect of limiting or curtailing our activities, including activities that might be profitable.

As of December, 31, 2015, our regulated subsidiaries include: JVB, a registered broker-dealer regulated by FINRA and subject to oversight by the SEC; CCFL (previously known as EuroDekania Management Limited), a U.K. company regulated by the FCA; and Cohen & Company Financial Management, LLC, Dekania Capital Management, LLC, and Cira SCM, LLC, each of which is a registered investment advisor regulated by the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act. Since our inception, our businesses have been operated within a legal and regulatory framework that is constantly developing and changing, requiring us to be able to monitor and comply with a broad range of legal and regulatory developments that affect our activities.

Certain of our businesses are also subject to compliance with laws and regulations of United States federal and state governments, foreign governments, their respective agencies and/or various self-regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to, among other things, the privacy of client information and any failure to comply with these regulations could expose us to liability and/or reputational damage. Additional legislation, changes in rules promulgated by financial authorities and self-regulatory organizations or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, either in the United States or abroad, may directly affect our mode of operation and profitability.

The United States and foreign government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, as well as state securities commissions in the United States, are empowered to conduct periodic examinations and initiate administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, and/or the suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer or its directors, officers, or employees. See “Item 1A — Risk Factors” beginning on page 16.

United States Regulation. As of December 31, 2015, JVB was registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC, was licensed to conduct business, and was a member of and regulated by FINRA. JVB is subject to the regulations of FINRA and industry standards of practice that cover many aspects of its business, including initial licensing requirements, sales and trading practices, relationships with customers (including the handling of cash and margin accounts), capital structure, capital requirements, record-keeping and reporting procedures, experience and training requirements for certain employees, and supervision of the conduct of affiliated persons, including directors, officers, and employees. FINRA has the power to expel, fine, and otherwise discipline member firms and their employees for violations of these rules and regulations. JVB is also registered as a broker-dealer in certain states, requiring us to comply with the laws, rules, and regulations of each state in which a broker-dealer subsidiary is registered. Each state may revoke the registration to conduct a securities business in that state and may fine or otherwise discipline broker-dealers and their employees for failure to comply with such state’s laws, rules, and regulations.

The SEC, FINRA, and various other regulatory agencies within and outside of the United States have stringent rules and regulations with respect to the maintenance of specific levels of net capital by regulated entities. Generally, a broker-dealer’s net capital is net worth plus qualified subordinated debt less deductions for certain types of assets. The net capital rule under the Exchange Act requires that at least a minimum part of a broker-dealer’s assets be maintained in a relatively liquid form. The SEC and FINRA impose rules that require notification when net capital falls below certain predefined criteria. These rules also dictate the ratio of debt to equity in the regulatory capital composition of a broker-dealer and constrain the ability of a broker-dealer to expand its business

---

 

under certain circumstances. If a firm fails to maintain the required net capital, it may be subject to suspension or revocation of registration by the applicable regulatory agency, and suspension or expulsion by these regulators could ultimately lead to the firm’s liquidation. Additionally, the net capital rule under the Exchange Act and certain FINRA rules impose requirements that may have the effect of prohibiting a broker-dealer from distributing or withdrawing capital and requiring prior notice to the SEC and FINRA for certain capital withdrawals.

If these net capital rules are changed or expanded, or if there is an unusually large charge against our net capital, our operations that require the intensive use of capital would be limited. A large operating loss or charge against our net capital could adversely affect our ability to expand or even maintain current levels of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Our investment advisor subsidiaries are registered with the SEC as investment advisers and are subject to the rules and regulations of the Investment Advisers Act. The Investment Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on registered investment advisers including record-keeping, operational and marketing requirements, disclosure obligations, limitations on principal transactions between an adviser and its affiliates and advisory clients, and prohibitions on fraudulent activities. The SEC is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Investment Advisers Act, ranging from fines and censure to termination of an investment adviser’s registration. Investment advisers are also subject to certain state securities laws and regulations.

 

We are also subject to the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), which imposes obligations regarding the prevention and detection of money-laundering activities, including the establishment of customer due diligence, customer verification, and other compliance policies and procedures. These regulations require certain disclosures by, and restrict the activities of, research analysts and broker-dealers, among others. Failure to comply with these new requirements may result in monetary, regulatory and, in the case of the Patriot Act, criminal penalties.

In July 2010, the federal government passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Dodd-Frank Act significantly restructures and intensifies regulation in the financial services industry, with provisions that include, among other things, the creation of a new systemic risk oversight body  (i.e., the Financial Stability Oversight Council), expansion of the authority of existing regulators, increased regulation of and restrictions on OTC derivatives markets and transactions, broadening of the reporting and regulation of executive compensation, expansion of the standards for market participants in dealing with clients and customers, and regulation of fiduciary duties owed by municipal advisors or conduit borrowers of municipal securities. In addition, Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act (known as the “Volker Rule”) and section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Act (known as the “swaps push-out rule”) limit proprietary trading of certain securities and swaps by certain banking entities. Although we are not a banking entity and are not otherwise subject to these rules, some of our clients and many of our counterparties are banks or entities affiliated with banks and will be subject to these restrictions.  These sections of the Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations that are adopted to implement them could negatively affect the swaps and securities markets by reducing their depth and liquidity and thereby affect pricing in these markets.  Further, the Dodd-Frank Act as a whole and the intensified regulatory environment will likely alter certain business practices and change the competitive landscape of the financial services industry, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.  We will continue to monitor all applicable developments in the implementation of Dodd-Frank and expect to adapt successfully to any new applicable legislative and regulatory requirements.

Foreign Regulation. Our U.K. subsidiary, CCFL, is authorized and regulated by the FCA. CCFL has FCA permission to carry on the following activities: (1) advising on investments; (2) agreeing to carry on a regulated activity; (3) arranging (bringing about) deals in investments; (4) arranging safeguarding and administration of assets; (5) dealing in investments as agent; (6) dealing in investments as principal; (7) making arrangements with a view to transactions in investments; and (8) managing investments. An overview of key aspects of the U.K.’s regulatory regime, which apply to CCFL, is set out below.

Ongoing regulatory obligations. As an FCA regulated entity, CCFL is subject to the FCA’s ongoing regulatory obligations, which cover the following wide-ranging aspects of its business:

Threshold Conditions: The FCA’s Threshold Conditions Sourcebook sets out five conditions that all U.K. authorized firms, including CCFL, must satisfy in order to become and remain authorized by the FCA. These relate to having adequate legal status, an appropriate location for the firm’s registered or head office, fit and proper links, adequate financial and non-financial resources, and the suitability to be and to remain authorized.

Principles for Businesses: CCFL is expected to comply with the FCA’s high-level principles, set out in the Principles for Businesses Sourcebook (the “Principles”). The Principles govern the way in which a regulated firm conducts business and include obligations to conduct business with integrity, due skill, care and diligence, to have appropriate regard for customers’ interests, to ensure adequate and appropriate communication with clients, and to ensure appropriate dialogue with regulators (both in the U.K. and overseas).

Systems and Controls: One of the FCA’s Principles requires a regulated firm to take reasonable care to organize and control its affairs responsibly effectively, with adequate risk management systems. Consequently, the FCA imposes overarching responsibilities

---

 

on the directors and senior management of a regulated firm. The FCA ultimately expects the senior management of a regulated firm to take responsibility for determining what processes and internal organization are appropriate to its business. Key requirements in this context include the need to have adequate systems and controls in relation to: (1) senior management arrangements and general organizational requirements; (2) compliance, internal audit, and financial crime prevention; (3) outsourcing; (4) record keeping; and (5) managing conflicts of interest.

Conduct of business obligation. The FCA imposes conduct of business rules that set out the obligations to which regulated firms are subject in their dealings with clients and potential clients. CCFL has FCA permission to deal only with eligible counterparties and professional clients in relation to the regulated activities it conducts. The detailed level of the conduct of business rules with which CCFL must comply is dependent on the categorization of its clients, which should be considered in the context of the regulated activity being performed. These rules include requirements relating to the type and level of information that must be provided to clients before business is conducted with or for them, the regulation of financial promotions, procedures for entering into client agreements, obligations relating to the suitability and appropriateness of investments, and rules about managing investments and reporting to clients.

 

Reporting. All authorized firms in the U.K. are required to report to the FCA on a periodic basis. CCFL’s reporting requirements are based on its scope of permissions. The FCA will use the information submitted by CCFL to monitor it on an ongoing basis. There are also high level reporting obligations under the Principles, whereby CCFL is required to deal with the FCA and other regulators in an open and co-operative way and to disclose to regulators appropriately anything relating to it of which the regulators would reasonably expect notice.

FCA’s enforcement powers. The FCA has a wide range of disciplinary and enforcement tools that it can use should a regulated firm fail to comply with its regulatory obligations. The FCA is not only able to investigate and take enforcement action in respect of breaches of FCA rules, but also in respect of insider dealing and market abuse offenses and breaches of anti-money laundering legislation. Formal sanctions vary from public censure to financial penalties to cancellation of an authorized firm’s permissions or withdrawal of an approved person’s approval.

Financial Resources. One of the FCA’s Principles requires a regulated firm to maintain adequate financial resources. Under the FCA rules, the required level of capital depends on CCFL’s prudential categorization, calculated in accordance with the relevant FCA rules. A firm’s prudential categorization is loosely based on the type of regulated activities that it conducts, as this in turn determines the level of risk to which a firm is considered exposed. CCFL is classified as a full scope BIPRU 730K Investment firm. In broad terms, this means that it would be subject to a base capital requirement of the higher of (1) €730,000; or (2) its credit risk plus its market risk plus its operational risk. There are also detailed ongoing regulatory capital requirements applicable to a regulated firm, including those relating to limits on large exposures, settlement and counterparty risk, client monies, and client relationships.

Anti-money Laundering Requirements. A U.K. financial institution is subject to additional client acceptance requirements, which stem from anti-money laundering legislation that requires a firm to identify its clients before conducting business with or for them and to retain appropriate documentary evidence of this process.

The key U.K. anti-money laundering rules and regulation are: (1) the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (as amended); (2) the Terrorism Act 2000 (as amended); (3) the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (as amended); (4) the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001; and (5) the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008. For an FCA regulated firm such as CCFL, there are additional obligations contained in the FCA’s rules. Guidance is also set out in the U.K. Joint Money Laundering Steering Group Guidance Notes, which the FCA may consider when determining compliance by a regulated firm with U.K. money laundering requirements.

As an FCA regulated entity, CCFL is required to ensure that it has adequate systems and controls to enable it to identify, assess, monitor, and manage financial crime risk. CCFL must also ensure that these systems and controls are comprehensive and proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of its activities.

In addition to potential regulatory sanctions from the FCA, failure to comply with the U.K.’s anti-money laundering requirements is a criminal offense; depending on the exact nature of the offense, such a failure is punishable by an unlimited fine, imprisonment, or both.

Approved Persons Regime. Individuals performing certain functions within a regulated entity (known as “controlled functions”) are required to be approved by the FCA. Once approved, the “approved person” becomes subject to the FCA’s Statements of Principle for Approved Persons, which include the obligation to act with integrity, and with due skill, care, and diligence. The FCA can take action against an approved person if it appears to it that such person is guilty of misconduct and the FCA is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to take action against such person.

Consequently, CCFL is required to have approved persons performing certain key functions, known as “required functions.” In addition, CCFL must have its senior management personnel approved to perform the appropriate “governing functions.” CCFL is required to ensure that it assesses and monitors the ongoing competence of its approved persons and their fitness and propriety.

 

---

 

Changes in Existing Laws and Rules. Additional legislation and regulations, changes in rules promulgated by the government regulatory bodies, or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of laws and regulations may directly affect the manner of our operation, our net capital requirements, or our profitability. In addition, any expansion of our activities into new areas may subject us to additional regulatory requirements that could adversely affect our business, reputation, and results of operations.

Available Information

Our internet website address is www.ifmi.com. We make available through our website, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports that we file or furnish pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such information with, or furnish such information to, the SEC.

 

Our SEC filings are available to be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our filings can also be obtained for free on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on our website in this filing or in other filings with the SEC, and the information contained on our website is not part of this filing.

.  

 

 

---

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

 

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties described below constitute all of the material risks of the Company of which we are currently aware; however, the risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only risks the Company will face. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are presently unaware, or that we do not currently deem to be material, may become important factors that affect us and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of our securities. Investing in the Company’s securities involves risk and the following risk factors, together with the other information contained in this report and the other reports and documents filed by us with the SEC, should be considered carefully.

 

Risks Related to Our Business

Difficult market conditions have adversely affected our business in many ways and may continue to adversely affect our business in a manner which could materially reduce our revenues.

Our business has been and may continue to be materially affected by conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions throughout the world. The financial markets continue to be volatile and continue to present many challenges such as the level and volatility of interest rates, investor sentiment, the availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage and real estate markets, consumer confidence, unemployment and geopolitical issues. These factors have resulted in significant declines in the performance of financial assets in general with even more severe pressure on securitized financial assets.

Our Capital Markets segment has been and continues to be materially and directly affected by conditions in the global financial markets including pricing pressures created by the consolidation of certain sectors of the financial services industry following the credit crisis.

Our asset management revenues have been and continue to be materially and directly affected by conditions in the global securitization markets. Further, since a significant portion of our asset management contracts relate to entities that are collateralized by securities issued by banks and insurance companies, we have been and continue to be directly and materially affected by adverse changes in those sectors. During the past few years of unfavorable market and economic conditions, including loss of confidence of ratings agencies, the credit quality of certain assets underlying CDOs has been adversely affected and investors have been and continue to be unwilling to invest in CDOs. As a result, our profitability has been adversely affected, and these same factors may continue to adversely affect our business. The future market and economic climate may further deteriorate due to factors beyond our control, including rising interest rates or inflation, increasing unemployment, continued turmoil in the global credit markets, terrorism or political uncertainty. In addition, since the collapse of the new issue securitization market, our new issue revenues continue to be a much smaller component of our overall revenues. If we are unable to increase these revenues, or replace them with new or other sources of revenue, our results of operations could continue to be adversely affected.

A prolonged economic slowdown, volatility in the markets, a recession, and increasing interest rates could impair our investments and harm our operating results.

Our investments are, and will continue to be, susceptible to economic slowdowns, recessions and rising interest rates, which may lead to financial losses in our investments and a decrease in revenues, net income and asset values. These events may reduce the value of our investments, reduce the number of attractive investment opportunities available to us and harm our operating results, which, in turn, may adversely affect our cash flow from operations.

Our ability to raise capital in the long-term or short-term debt capital markets or the equity markets, or to access secured lending markets, has been and could continue to be adversely affected by conditions in the U.S. and international markets and the economy. Global market and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, disrupted and volatile. In particular, the cost and availability of funding have been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads. As a result of concern about the stability of the markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding to borrowers. Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets and economy may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition and the willingness of certain counterparties to do business with us.

We may experience write downs of financial instruments and other losses related to the volatile and illiquid market conditions.

The credit markets in the U.S. experienced significant disruption and volatility from mid-2007 through early 2009, and challenging conditions have continued since that time. Although financial markets have become more stable and have generally

---

 

improved since 2009, there remains a certain degree of uncertainty about a global economic recovery. Available liquidity, particularly through CDOs and other securitizations, declined precipitously during the credit crisis and remains significantly depressed. The disruption in these markets generally, and in the U.S. and European markets in particular, impacted and may continue to impact our business. Furthermore, the asset management revenues we derive from CDOs that hold these types of investments are based on the outstanding performing principal balance of those investments. Therefore, as adverse market conditions result in defaults within these CDOs, our management fees have declined and may continue to decline. We have exposure to these markets and products, and if market conditions continue to worsen, the fair value of our investments and our management fees could further deteriorate. In addition, market volatility, illiquid market conditions and disruptions in the global credit markets have made it extremely difficult to value certain of our securities. Subsequent valuations, in light of factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the values of these securities, and when such securities are sold, it may be at a price materially lower than the current fair value. Any of these factors could require us to take further write downs in the fair value of our investment portfolio or cause our management fees to decline, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations in future periods.

We have incurred losses for the period covered by this report and in the recent past, and may incur losses in the future.

The Company recorded net losses of $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. We may incur additional losses in future periods. If we are unable to finance future losses, those losses may have a significant effect on our liquidity as well as our ability to operate our business.

In addition, the Company may incur significant expenses in connection with initiating new business activities or in connection with any expansion or reorganization of our businesses. We may also engage in strategic acquisitions and investments for which we may incur significant expenses. Accordingly, we may need to increase our revenue at a rate greater than our expenses in order to achieve and maintain our profitability. If our revenue does not increase sufficiently, or even if our revenue does increase but we are unable to manage our expenses, we will not achieve and maintain profitability in future periods.

We have experienced difficulties in our Capital Markets segment over the past several years due to intense competition in our industry, which has resulted in significant strain on our administrative, operational and financial resources. These difficulties may continue in the future.

The financial services industry and all of our businesses are intensely competitive, and we expect them to remain so. We compete with commercial banks, brokerage firms, insurance companies, sponsors of mutual funds, hedge funds and other companies offering financial services in the United States, globally, and through the internet. We compete on the basis of several factors, including transaction execution, capital or access to capital, products and services, innovation, reputation, risk appetite and price. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become more concentrated as institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms or have declared bankruptcy. These developments could result in our competitors gaining greater capital and other resources such as a broader range of products and services and geographic diversity. We have experienced and may continue to experience pricing pressures in our Capital Markets segment as a result of these factors and as some of our competitors may seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

Both margins and volumes in certain products and markets within the fixed income brokerage business have decreased materially as competition has increased and general market activity has declined. Further, we expect that competition will increase over time, resulting in continued margin pressure. These challenges have materially adversely affected our Capital Markets segment’s results of operations and may continue to do so.

We intend to focus on improving the performance of our Capital Markets segment, which could place additional demands on our resources and increase our expenses. Improving the performance of our Capital Markets segment will depend on, among other things, our ability to successfully identify groups and individuals to join our firm. It may take more than a year for us to determine whether we have successfully integrated new individuals and capabilities into our operations. During that time, we may incur significant expenses and expend significant time and resources toward training, integration and business development. If we are unable to hire and retain senior management or other qualified personnel, such as sales people and traders, we will not be able to grow our business and our financial results may be materially and adversely affected.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully improve the operations of our Capital Markets segment, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenue and control expenses.

The sale of our European business may be delayed or may not close, which could negatively affect our ability to carry out our business plan, and the sale of any business line, including the European business, could adversely affect our continuing business and our expenses, revenues, results of operation, cash flows and financial position.

---

 

On August 19, 2014, the Operating LLC entered into the European Sale Agreement to sell its European operations to C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC, an entity controlled by Daniel G. Cohen, the vice chairman of our board of directors. The sale of the European business is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approval from the FCA.

On March 26, 2015, the parties to the European Sale Agreement entered into an amendment which, among other things, extended the deadline for the closing of the transaction from March 30, 2015 to June 30, 2015. On June 30, 2015, the transaction deadline was further extended to December 31, 2015. The European Sale Agreement provides that either party may terminate the European Sale Agreement after the December 31, 2015 transaction deadline. On February 18, 2016, C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC provided notice to the Operating LLC that it continues to evaluate the transaction. To date, neither party has terminated the European Sale Agreement, and the Company and the Operating LLC continue to evaluate the transaction. Accordingly, the sale of the European business may be delayed or may not close at all, which may negatively impact our ability to carry out our business plan. In addition, the sale of any business line, including the sale of the European business, possesses inherent risks. We may incur higher than anticipated expenses in connection with the sale of our European business, lower-than-expected proceeds from such sale, unexpected costs associated with the separation of the European business from our remaining business operations, and we could be subject to post-closing claims for indemnification. Many of the individuals who will no longer be employees of the Company as a result of the sale of our European business may possess specific knowledge or expertise, and we may be unable to transfer that knowledge or expertise to our remaining employees. Based on the foregoing, the sale of our European business may adversely affect our continuing business and our expenses, revenues, results of operation, cash flows and financial position.

In the event the European Sale Agreement to sell the European operations is terminated prior to the closing of the transaction, the Operating LLC will continue to own the European business. The European business incurred an operating loss of $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and may continue to incur losses in the future. Accordingly, if the sale of the European business is not consummated, then the continuing European operations may adversely affect our continuing business and our expenses, revenues, results of operation, cash flows and financial positions.

If we fail to manage our cost reductions effectively, our business could be disrupted and our financial results could be adversely affected.

The Company continues to look for ways to reduce infrastructure costs and reposition itself in the financial services industry. Beginning in 2010 and continuing to the present, the Company executed initiatives that created efficiencies within its business and decreased operating expenses through a reduction in workforce, realignment of operating facilities, a merger of its two registered U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries, and restructuring of operating systems and system support. If these and new initiatives do not have the desired effects or result in the projected increased efficiencies, the Company may incur additional or unexpected expenses, reputational damage, or loss of customers which would adversely affect the Company’s operations and revenues.

In addition, during 2014 and 2015, we further reduced our headcount. Our cost reduction initiatives have placed and will continue to place a burden on our management, systems and resources, and will generally increase our dependence on key persons and reduce functional back-ups. Many of the employees who were terminated possessed specific knowledge or expertise, and we may be unable to transfer that knowledge or expertise to our remaining employees. In that case, the absence of such employees may create significant operational difficulties. Further, these cost reduction initiatives may reduce employee morale and create concern among potential and existing employees about job security, which may lead to difficulty in hiring and increased turnover in our current workforce, and place undue strain upon our operational resources. In addition, we may experience further reductions in our workforce, which would compound the risks we face. As a result, our ability to respond to unexpected challenges may be impaired, and we may be unable to take advantage of new opportunities.

We must retain, train, supervise and manage our employees effectively during this period of change in our business, and our ability to retain our employees may become more difficult as we face an increasingly competitive landscape.

In response to changes in industry and market conditions, the Company may be required to further strategically realign its resources and consider restructuring, disposing of, or otherwise exiting businesses. We cannot assure you that we will be able to:

Our Capital Markets segment depends significantly on a limited group of customers.

---

 

From time to time, based on market conditions, a small number of our customers may account for a significant portion of our revenues earned in our Capital Markets segment. None of our customers is obligated contractually to use our services. Accordingly, these customers may direct their activities to other firms at any time. The loss of or a significant reduction in demand for our services from any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

If we do not retain our senior management and continue to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to execute our business strategy.

The members of our senior management team have extensive experience in the financial services industry. Their reputations and relationships with investors, financing sources and members of the business community in our industry, among others, are critical elements in operating and expanding our business. As a result, the loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management team could impair our ability to execute our business strategies, which could hinder our ability to achieve and sustain profitability.

The Operating LLC entered into an employment agreement (including non-competition provisions) with each of Mr. Daniel G. Cohen, our Vice Chairman and Mr. Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., our executive vice president and chief financial officer. Mr. Cohen’s and Mr. Pooler’s employment agreements ended on December 31, 2015 but were automatically renewed for an additional one-year period in accordance with the terms of the employment agreements which provide that the term will be renewed automatically for additional one-year periods, unless terminated by either of the parties in accordance with the terms of each of the employment agreements. There can be no assurance that the terms of the employment agreements will provide sufficient incentives for each of the executive officers to continue employment with us.

We depend on the diligence, experience, skill and network of business contacts of our executive officers and employees in connection with (1) our Capital Markets segment, (2) our asset management operations, (3) our investment activities, and (4) the evaluation, negotiation, structuring and management of new business opportunities. Our business depends on the expertise of our personnel and their ability to work together as an effective team and our success depends substantially on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Competition for employees with the necessary qualifications is intense, and we may not be successful in our efforts to recruit and retain the required personnel. The inability to retain and recruit qualified personnel could affect our ability to provide an acceptable level of service to our clients and funds, attract new clients, and develop new lines of business, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Payment of severance could strain our cash flow.

Certain members of our senior management have agreements that provide for substantial severance payments. Should several of these senior managers leave our employ under circumstances entitling them to severance, or become disabled or die, the need to pay these severance benefits could put a strain on our cash flow.

Our business will require a significant amount of cash, and if it is not available, our business and financial performance will be significantly harmed.

We require a substantial amount of cash to fund our investments, pay our expenses and hold our assets. More specifically, we require cash to:

Our primary sources of working capital and cash are expected to consist of:

We may not be able to generate a sufficient amount of cash from operations and investing and financing activities in order to successfully execute our business strategy.

---

 

Failure to obtain or maintain adequate capital and funding would adversely affect the growth and results of our operations and may, in turn, negatively affect the market price of our Common Stock.

Liquidity is essential to our businesses. We depend upon the availability of adequate funding and capital for our operations. In particular, we may need to raise additional capital in order to significantly grow our business. Our liquidity could be substantially adversely affected by our inability to raise funding in the long-term or short-term debt capital markets or the equity capital markets or our inability to access the secured lending markets. Factors that we cannot control, such as continued or additional disruption of the financial markets, or negative views about the financial services industry generally, have limited and may continue to limit our ability to raise capital. In addition, our ability to raise capital could be impaired if lenders develop a negative perception of our long-term or short-term financial prospects. Such negative perceptions could be developed if we incur large trading losses, we suffer a decline in the level of our business activity, we suffer material litigation losses, regulatory authorities take significant action against us, or we discover significant employee misconduct or illegal activity, among other reasons. Sufficient funding or capital may not be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable, or at all. If we are unable to raise funding using the methods described above, we would likely need to finance or liquidate unencumbered assets, such as our investment and trading portfolios, in order to meet our maturing liabilities. We may be unable to sell some of our assets, or we may have to sell assets at a discount from market value, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.  If we are unable to meet our funding needs on a timely basis, our business would be adversely affected and there may be a negative impact on the market price of our Common Stock.

The lack of liquidity in certain investments may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We hold investments in securities of private companies, investment funds, CDOs and CLOs. A portion of these securities may be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or may otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises.

If we are unable to manage the risks of international operations effectively, our business could be adversely affected.

We currently provide services and products to clients in Europe, through offices in London and Paris. There are certain additional risks inherent in doing business in international markets, particularly in the regulated brokerage and asset management industries. These risks include:

If we are unable to manage any of these risks effectively, our business could be adversely affected.

In addition, our current international operations expose us to the risk of fluctuations in currency exchange rates generally and fluctuations in the exchange rates for the Euro and the British Pound Sterling in particular. Although we may hedge our foreign currency risk, we may not be able to do so successfully and may incur losses that could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

The securities settlement process exposes us to risks that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We provide brokerage services to our clients in the form of “matched principal transactions” or by providing liquidity by purchasing securities from them on a principal basis. In “matched principal transactions” we act as a “middleman” by serving as a counterparty to both a buyer and a seller in matching reciprocal back-to-back trades. These transactions, which generally involve bonds, are then settled through clearing institutions with which we have a contractual relationship. There is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain existing contractual relationships with clearing institutions on favorable terms or that we will be able to establish relationships with new clearing institutions on favorable terms, or at all.

In executing matched principal transactions, we are exposed to the risk that one of the counterparties to a transaction may fail to fulfill its obligations, either because it is not matched immediately or, even if matched, one party fails to deliver the cash or securities it is obligated to deliver upon settlement. In addition, some of the products we trade or may trade in the future are in less commoditized markets which may exacerbate this risk because transactions in such markets may not to settle on a timely basis. Adverse movements in the prices of securities that are the subject of these transactions can increase our risk. In addition, widespread technological or communication failures, as well as actual or perceived credit difficulties, or the insolvency of one or more large or

---

 

visible market participants, could cause market-wide credit difficulties or other market disruptions. These failures, difficulties or disruptions could result in a large number of market participants not settling transactions or otherwise not performing their obligations.

We are subject to financing risk in these circumstances because if a transaction does not settle on a timely basis, the resulting unmatched position may need to be financed, either directly by us or through one of our clearing organizations at our expense. These charges may not be recoverable from the failing counterparty. Finally, in instances where the unmatched position or failure to deliver is prolonged or widespread due to rapid or widespread declines in liquidity for an instrument, there may also be regulatory capital charges required to be taken by us which, depending on their size and duration, could limit our business flexibility or even force the curtailment of those portions of our business requiring higher levels of capital. Credit or settlement losses of this nature could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

In the process of executing matched principal transactions, miscommunications and other errors by our clients or by us can arise whereby a transaction is not completed with one or more counterparties to the transaction, leaving us with either a long or short unmatched position. If the unmatched position is promptly discovered and there is a prompt disposition of the unmatched position, the risk to us is usually limited. If the discovery of an out trade is delayed, the risk is heightened by the increased possibility of intervening market movements prior to disposition. Although out trades usually become known at the time of, or later on the day of, the trade, it is possible that they may not be discovered until later in the settlement process. When out trades are discovered, our policy will generally be to have the unmatched position disposed of promptly, whether or not this disposition would result in a loss to us. The occurrence of unmatched positions generally rises with increases in the volatility of the market and, depending on their number and amount, such out trades have the potential to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we may also provide brokerage services in the form of agency transactions. In agency transactions, we charge a commission for connecting buyers and sellers and assisting in the negotiation of the price and other material terms of the transaction. After all material terms of a transaction are agreed upon, we identify the buyer and seller to each other and leave them to settle the trade directly. We are exposed to credit risk for commissions we bill to clients for agency brokerage services.

Participation in matched principal, principal, or agency transactions subjects us to disputes, counterparty credit risk, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other market wide or counterparty specific risks. Any losses arising from such risks could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the failure of a significant number of counterparties or a counterparty that holds a significant amount of derivatives exposure, or that has significant financial exposure to, or reliance on, the mortgage, asset-backed or related markets, could have a material adverse effect on the trading volume and liquidity in a particular market for which we provide brokerage services or on the broader financial markets.

We have policies and procedures to identify, monitor and manage these risks, through reporting and control procedures and by monitoring credit standards applicable to our clients. These policies and procedures, however, may not be fully effective. Some of our risk management methods will depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients or other matters that are publicly available or otherwise accessible by us. That information may not, in all cases, be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. If our policies and procedures are not fully effective or we are not always successful in monitoring or evaluating the risks to which we may be exposed, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, we may not be able to obtain insurance to cover all of the types of risks we face and any insurance policies we do obtain may not provide adequate coverage for covered risks.

We are exposed to the risk that third parties that are indebted to us will not perform their obligations.

Credit risk refers to the risk of loss arising from borrower or counterparty default when a borrower, counterparty or obligor does not meet its obligations. We incur significant credit risk exposure through our Capital Markets segment. This risk may arise from a variety of business activities, including but not limited to extending credit to clients through various lending commitments; providing short or long-term funding that is secured by physical or financial collateral whose value may at times be insufficient to fully cover the loan repayment amount; entering into swap or other derivative contracts under which counterparties have obligations to make payments to us; and posting margin and/or collateral to clearing houses, clearing agencies, exchanges, banks, securities firms and other financial counterparties. We incur credit risk in traded securities and loan pools whereby the value of these assets may fluctuate based on realized or expected defaults on the underlying obligations or loans.

There is a possibility that continued difficult economic conditions may further negatively impact our clients and our current credit exposures. Although we regularly review our credit exposures, default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or foresee.

---

 

We are exposed to various risks related to margin requirements under repurchase agreements and securities financing arrangements and are highly dependent on our clearing relationships.  

We maintain repurchase agreements with various third party financial institutions and other counterparties. Under those repurchase agreements we act as both a buyer and a seller of the subject securities. Our business related to these repurchase agreements is predominantly matched, meaning that we do not purchase or sell securities unless there is another institution prepared to simultaneously purchase or sell securities to or from us, as applicable. There are limits to the amount of securities that may be transferred pursuant to these agreements, and available lines both for us and our counterparties for whom we purchase securities are approved on a case-by-case basis after each counterparty has gone through a credit review process. The repurchase agreements we execute with our counterparties include substantive provisions other than those covenants and other customary provisions contained in standard master repurchase agreements. However, while these additional provisions may work to mitigate some of the risks related to repurchase agreement transactions, these additional substantive provisions do not guarantee the performance of a counterparty or alleviate all of the potential risks we could face from entering into repurchase agreement transactions. 

The repurchase agreements generally require the seller under such repurchase agreement to transfer additional securities to the counterparty who is acting as the buyer under the repurchase agreement in the event that the value of the securities then held by the buyer falls below specified levels. The repurchase agreements contain events of default in cases where a counterparty breaches its obligations under the agreements. When we are acting in the capacity of a seller under these agreements we receive margin calls from time to time in the ordinary course of business, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to satisfy requests from our counterparties to post additional collateral in the future. Similarly, when we are acting in the capacity of a buyer under these agreements we make margin calls from time to time to our seller counterparties in the ordinary course of business and no assurance can be given that our counterparties will have adequate funds or collateral to satisfy such margin call requirements. Generally, if there were an event of default under the repurchase agreements, such event of default would provide the non-defaulting counterparty with the option to terminate all outstanding repurchase transactions with us and make all amounts due from the defaulting counterparty immediately payable. However, there can be no assurance that any such defaulting counterparty will have the funds or collateral needed to fully satisfy any such margin call or other amount due. Generally, repurchase obligations are full recourse obligations and if we were to default under a repurchase obligation, the counterparty would have recourse to our other assets if the collateral was not sufficient to satisfy the obligation in full.

In addition, our clearing brokers provide securities financing arrangements including margin arrangements and securities borrowing and lending arrangements. These arrangements generally require us to transfer additional securities or cash to the clearing broker in the event that the value of the securities then held by the clearing broker in the margin account falls below specified levels, and contain events of default in cases where we breach our obligations under such agreements. An event of default under a clearing agreement would give the clearing broker the option to terminate the clearing arrangement and any amounts owed to the clearing broker would be immediately due and payable. These obligations are recourse to us.

Furthermore, we are highly dependent on our relationships with our clearing brokers. Any termination of our clearing arrangements whether due to a breach of the agreement or any default, bankruptcy or reorganization of our clearing brokers would result in a significant disruption to our business as we clear all trades through these entities. Any such termination would have a significant negative impact on our dealings and relationship with our customers.

We have market risk exposure from unmatched principal transactions entered into by our brokerage desks, which could result in substantial losses to us and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We allow certain of our brokerage desks access to limited capital to enter into unmatched principal transactions in the ordinary course of business for the purpose of facilitating clients’ execution needs for transactions initiated by such clients or to add liquidity to certain illiquid markets. As a result, we have market risk exposure on these unmatched principal transactions. Our exposure will vary based on the size of the overall positions, the terms and liquidity of the instruments brokered, and the amount of time the positions will be held before we dispose of the position.

We do not expect to track our exposure to unmatched positions on an intra-day basis. These unmatched positions are intended to be held short-term. Due to a number of factors, including the nature of the position and access to the market on which we trade, we may not be able to match the position or effectively hedge our exposure and often may be forced to hold a position overnight that has not been hedged. To the extent these unmatched positions are not disposed of intra-day, we mark these positions to market. Adverse movements in the securities underlying these positions or a downturn or disruption in the markets for these positions could result in our sustaining a substantial loss. In addition, any principal gains and losses resulting from these positions could on occasion have a disproportionate effect, positive or negative, on our financial condition and results of operations for any particular reporting period.

---

 

Pricing and other competitive pressures may impair the revenues and profitability of our brokerage business.  

In recent years, we have experienced significant pricing pressures on trading margins and commissions, primarily in debt trading. In the fixed income market, regulatory requirements have resulted in greater price transparency, leading to increased price competition and decreased trading margins. The trend toward using alternative trading systems is continuing to grow, which may result in decreased commission and trading revenue, reduce our participation in the trading markets and our ability to access market information, and lead to the creation of new and stronger competitors. Additional pressure on sales and trading revenue may impair the profitability of our brokerage business. We believe that price competition and pricing pressures in these and other areas will continue as institutional investors continue to reduce the amounts they are willing to pay, including reducing the number of brokerage firms they use, and some of our competitors seek to obtain market share by reducing fees, commissions or margins.

Increase in capital commitments in our trading business increases the potential for significant losses.  

We may enter into transactions in which we commit our own capital as part of our trading business. The number and size of these transactions may materially affect our results of operations in a given period. We may also incur significant losses from our trading activities due to market fluctuations and volatility from quarter to quarter. We maintain trading positions in the fixed income market to facilitate client-trading activities. To the extent that we own security positions, in any of those markets, a downturn in the value of those securities or in those markets could result in losses from a decline in value. Conversely, to the extent that we have sold securities we do not own in any of those markets, an upturn in those markets could expose us to potentially unlimited losses as we attempt to acquire the securities in a rising market. Moreover, taking such positions in times of significant volatility can lead to significant unrealized losses, which further impact our ability to borrow to finance such activities.

Our principal trading and investments expose us to risk of loss.

A significant portion of our revenues is derived from trading in which we act as principal. The Company may incur trading losses relating to the purchase, sale or short sale of corporate and asset-backed fixed income securities and other securities for our own account and from other principal trading. In any period, we may experience losses as a result of price declines, lack of trading volume, general market conditions, employee inexperience, errors or misconduct, and illiquidity. From time to time, we may engage in a large block trade in a single security or maintain large position concentrations in a single security, securities of a single issuer, or securities of issuers engaged in a specific industry. In general, any downward price movement in these securities could result in a reduction of our revenues and profits.

In addition, we may engage in hedging transactions and strategies that may not properly mitigate losses in our principal positions. If the transactions and strategies are not successful, we could suffer significant losses.

Our investments in CLOs are subject to various risks, which may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

 

As of December 31, 2015, we had $14.9 million in other investments, at fair value. Of that amount, $11.6 million, or 78% represent investments in CLO vehicles.

Our Principal Investment portfolio includes equity investments in CLO vehicles, which involves a number of significant risks.  CLO vehicles are typically very highly levered and, therefore, the equity tranches in which we invest are subject to a higher degree of risk of total loss.  In particular, investors in CLO vehicles indirectly bear risks of the underlying debt investments held by such CLO vehicles. We generally only have the right to receive payments from the CLO vehicles, and generally do not have direct rights against the underlying borrowers or the entity that sponsored the CLO vehicle.  In addition, we have limited control of the administration and amendment of any CLO in which we invest.

While the CLO vehicles we target generally enable an investor to acquire interests in a pool of senior loans without the expenses associated with directly holding the same investments, the CLO will pay its expenses, including trustee and rating agency fees, prior to any distributions to the holder of the CLO equity.  Although it is difficult to predict whether the prices of indices and securities underlying CLO vehicles will rise or fall, these prices (and, therefore, the prices of the CLO vehicles) will be influenced by the same types of political and economic events that affect issuers of securities and capital markets generally.  The failure by a CLO vehicle in which we invest to satisfy financial covenants, including with respect to adequate collateralization and/or interest coverage tests, could lead to a reduction in its payments to us.  In the event that a CLO vehicle fails certain tests, holders of debt senior to us may be entitled to additional payments that would, in turn, reduce the payments we would otherwise be entitled to receive. Separately, we may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting CLO vehicle or any other investment we may make.

The interests we have acquired in CLO vehicles are generally thinly traded or have only a limited trading market.  CLO vehicles are typically privately offered and sold, even in the secondary market.  As a result, investments in CLO vehicles may be

---

 

characterized as illiquid securities.  In addition, investing in CLO vehicles carries additional risks, including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the fact that our investments in CLO equity will be subordinate to other classes of note tranches; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the CLO vehicle or unexpected investment results.  Our total equity may also decline over time if our principal recovery with respect to CLO equity investments is less than the price that we paid for those investments.

If we are unable to manage any of these risks effectively, our results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

Our principal investments are concentrated in a few investments and may represent a significant portion of our invested capital.

As of December 31, 2015, we had $14.9 million in other investments, at fair value. Of that amount, $2.9 million, or 19.5% represent investments in two separate investment funds and permanent capital vehicles: EuroDekania and Tiptree.  Our results of operations and financial condition may be significantly impacted by the financial results of these investments.

If the investments we make on behalf of our investment funds, permanent capital vehicles and CDOs perform poorly, we will suffer a decline in our asset management revenue and earnings because some of our fees are subject to the credit performance of the portfolios of assets. In addition, the investors in our investment funds and CDOs and, to a lesser extent, our permanent capital vehicles may seek to terminate our management agreements based on poor performance. Any of these results could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to raise capital for future investment funds, permanent capital vehicles and CDOs.

Our revenue from our asset management business is primarily derived from fees earned for managing our CDOs and management fees paid by the investment funds and separate accounts we manage. Our CDOs will generate three types of fees: (1) senior fees that are generally paid to us before interest is paid on any of the securities in the capital structure; (2) subordinated fees that are generally paid to us after interest is paid on securities in the capital structure; and (3) incentive fees that are generally paid to us after a period of years in the life of the CDO and after the holders of the most junior CDO securities have been paid a specified return.

In the case of the investment funds and separately managed accounts, our management fees are based on the equity of and net income earned by the vehicles, which is substantially based on the performance of the securities in which they invest.

Furthermore, in the event that our CDOs or investment funds perform poorly, our asset management revenues and earnings will suffer a decline. We may be unable to structure new CDOs or to raise capital for new investment funds to offset any losses we may experience. Our management contracts may be terminated for various reasons.

We could lose management fee income from the CDOs we manage or client assets under management as a result of the triggering of certain structural protections built into such CDOs.

The CDOs we manage generally contain structural provisions including, but not limited to, over-collateralization requirements and/or market value triggers that are meant to protect investors from deterioration in the credit quality of the underlying collateral pool. In certain cases, breaches of these structural provisions can lead to events of default under the indentures governing the CDOs and, ultimately, acceleration of the notes issued by the CDOs and liquidation of the underlying collateral. In the event of a liquidation of the collateral underlying a CDO, we will lose client assets under management and therefore management fees, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings. In addition, all of the CDOs we manage have reached their auction call redemption features which means the portfolio of collateral for each CDO is subject to an auction on either a quarterly or bi-annual basis. If an auction is successful, the management contract related to such CDO will be terminated in connection with the liquidation of the CDO and we will lose the related management fees.  As of December 31, 2015, the auctions for the Dekania Preferred Funding I CDO and the Dekania Preferred Funding II CDO were successful.

We may need to offer new investment strategies and products in order to continue to generate revenue.

The asset management industry is subject to rapid change. Strategies and products that had historically been attractive may lose their appeal for various reasons. Thus, strategies and products that have generated fee revenue for us in the past may fail to do so in the future, in which case we would have to develop new strategies and products. It could be both expensive and difficult for us to develop new strategies and products, and we may not be successful in this regard. Since the disruptions in the global financial markets, we have had difficulty expanding our offerings which has inhibited our growth and harmed our competitive position in the asset management industry, and this may continue in the future.

---

 

If our risk management systems for our businesses are ineffective, we may be exposed to material unanticipated losses.

We seek to manage, monitor, and control our operational, legal and regulatory risk through operational and compliance reporting systems, internal controls, management review processes and other mechanisms, and may not fully mitigate the risk exposure of our businesses in all economic or market environments or protect against all types of risk. Further, our risk management methods may not effectively predict future risk exposures, which could be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate. In addition, some of our risk management methods are based on an evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, and other matters that are based on assumptions that may no longer be accurate. A failure to adequately manage our growth, or to effectively manage our risk, could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition. Our risk management processes include addressing potential conflicts of interest that arise in our business. We have procedures and controls in place to address conflicts of interest. Management of potential conflicts of interest has become increasingly complex as we expand our business activities through more numerous transactions, obligations and interests with and among our clients. The failure to adequately address, or the perceived failure to adequately address, conflicts of interest could affect our reputation, the willingness of clients to transact business with us, or give rise to litigation or regulatory actions. Therefore, there can be no assurance that conflicts of interest will not arise in the future, and such conflicts could cause material harm to us.

Our failure to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business.

Appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is complex and difficult and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential or actual conflicts of interest. It is possible that potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to investor dissatisfaction or litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. In addition, regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest would have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including an inability to raise additional funds, a reluctance of counterparties to do business with us and the costs of defending litigation.

We are highly dependent on information and communications systems. Systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our operating results.

Our business will depend, to a substantial degree, on the proper functioning of our information and communications systems and our ability to retain the employees and consultants who operate and maintain these systems. Any failure or interruption of our systems, due to systems failures, staff departures or otherwise, could result in delays, increased costs or other problems which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. A disaster, such as water damage to an office, an explosion or a prolonged loss of electrical power, could materially interrupt our business operations and cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability. In addition, if security measures contained in our systems are breached as a result of third party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, our reputation may be damaged and our business could suffer. We have developed a business continuity plan, however, there are no assurances that such plan will be successful in preventing, timely and adequately addressing, or mitigating the negative effects of any failure or interruption.

There can be no assurance that our information systems and other technology will continue to be able to accommodate our operations, or that the cost of maintaining the systems and technology will not materially increase from the current level. A failure to accommodate our operations, or a material increase in costs related to information systems and technology, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may not be able to keep pace with continuing changes in technology.

Our market is characterized by rapidly changing technology. To be successful, we must adapt to this rapidly changing environment by continually improving the performance, features, and reliability of our services. We could incur substantial costs if we need to modify our services or infrastructure or adapt our technology to respond to these changes. A delay or failure to address technological advances and developments or an increase in costs resulting from these changes could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to protect client data or prevent breaches of our information systems could expose us to liability or reputational damage.  

The secure transmission of confidential information over public networks is a critical element of our operations. We are dependent on information technology networks and systems to securely process, transmit and store electronic information and to communicate among our locations and with our clients and vendors. As the breadth and complexity of this infrastructure continue to grow, the potential risk of security breaches and cyber-attacks increases. As a financial services company, we may be subject to cyber-attacks and phishing scams by third parties. In addition, vulnerabilities of our external service providers and other third parties could pose security risks to client information. Such breaches could lead to shutdowns or disruptions of our systems and potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential information.

---

 

In providing services to clients, we manage, utilize and store sensitive and confidential client data, including personal data. As a result, we are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect this information, such as U.S. federal and state laws and foreign regulations governing the protection of personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number, change frequently and sometimes conflict. If any person, including any of our employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to client data, or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to significant monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, fines and/or criminal prosecution in one or more jurisdictions. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client data, whether through systems failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, could damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients. Similarly, unauthorized access to or through our information systems, whether by our employees or third parties, including a cyber-attack by computer programmers and hackers who may deploy viruses, worms or other malicious software programs, could result in negative publicity, significant remediation costs, legal liability, financial responsibility under our security guarantee to reimburse clients for losses resulting from unauthorized activity in their accounts and damage to our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, our liability insurance might not be sufficient in type or amount to cover us against claims related to security breaches, cyber-attacks, phishing scams and other related breaches.

We are largely dependent on Pershing LLC to provide clearing services.

Our broker-dealers rely on Pershing LLC to provide clearing services, as well as other operational and support functions that they cannot provide internally. If our relationship with Pershing LLC is terminated, there can be no assurance that the functions previously provided could be replaced on comparable economic terms.

 

We depend on third-party software licenses and the loss of any of our key licenses could adversely affect our ability to provide our brokerage services.

We license software from third parties, some of which is integral to our electronic brokerage systems and our business. Such licenses are generally terminable if we breach our obligations under the licenses or if the licensor gives us notice in advance of the termination. If any of these relationships were terminated, or if any of these third parties were to cease doing business, we may be forced to spend significant time and money to replace the licensed software. These replacements may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all. A termination of any of these relationships could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and ability to compete. In addition, our failure to satisfy the financial covenants in our debt agreements could result in a default and acceleration of repayment of the indebtedness thereunder.

Our balance sheet includes approximately $56.4 million par value of recourse indebtedness. Our indebtedness could have important consequences to our stockholders. For example, our indebtedness could:

 

Under the junior subordinated notes related to the Alesco Capital Trust, we are required to maintain a total debt to capitalization ratio of less than 0.95 to 1.0. Also, because the aggregate amount of our outstanding subordinated debt exceeds 25% of our net worth, we are unable to issue any further subordinated debt.

As of December 31, 2015, we have a substantial amount of debt with variable interest rates. We may experience material increases in our interest expense as a result of increases in general interest rate levels.

---

 

In addition, our indebtedness imposes restrictions that limit our discretion with regard to certain business matters, including our ability to engage in consolidations and mergers and our ability to transfer and lease certain of our properties. Such restrictions could make it more difficult for us to expand, finance our operations and engage in other business activities that may be in our interest.

Our ability to comply with these and any other provisions of such agreements will be affected by changes in our operating and financial performance, changes in business conditions or results of operations, adverse regulatory developments or other events beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants could result in a default, which could cause our indebtedness to become due and payable. If the maturity of our indebtedness were accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to pay such indebtedness. Any additional indebtedness we may incur in the future may subject us to similar or even more restrictive conditions.

If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures in the future, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

If our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, we may not be able to provide reliable financial information. Because we are a smaller reporting company, we are not required to obtain, nor have we voluntarily obtained, an auditor attestation regarding the effectiveness of our controls as of December 31, 2015. Therefore, as of December 31, 2015, we have only performed management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls and management has determined that our internal controls are effective as of December 31, 2015. Any failure to maintain effective controls in the future could adversely affect our business or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Such non-compliance could also result in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. In addition, perceptions of our business among customers, suppliers, rating agencies, lenders, investors, securities analysts and others could be adversely affected.

Accounting rules for certain of our transactions are highly complex and involve significant judgment and assumptions. Changes in accounting interpretations or assumptions could adversely impact our financial statements.

Accounting rules for transfers of financial assets, income taxes, compensation arrangements including share based compensation, securitization transactions, consolidation of variable interest entities, determining the fair value of financial instruments and other aspects of our operations are highly complex and involve significant judgment and assumptions. These complexities could lead to delay in preparation of our financial information. Changes in accounting interpretations or assumptions could materially impact our financial statements.

We may change our investment strategy, hedging strategy, asset allocation and operational policies without our stockholders’ consent, which may result in riskier investments and adversely affect the market value of our Common Stock.

We may change our investment strategy, hedging strategy, asset allocation and/or operational policies at any time without the consent of our stockholders. A change in our investment or hedging strategy may increase our exposure to various risks including interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations. Furthermore, our board of directors will determine our operational policies and may amend or revise our policies, including polices with respect to our acquisitions, growth, operations, indebtedness, capitalization and distributions, or our board may approve transactions that deviate from these policies without a vote of, or notice to, our stockholders. Operational policy changes could adversely affect the market value of our Common Stock.

Maintenance of our Investment Company Act exemption imposes limits on our operations, and loss of our Investment Company Act exemption would adversely affect our operations.

We seek to conduct our operations so that we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Section 3(a)(l)(C) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), defines an “investment company” as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(l) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.

We are a holding company that conducts our business primarily through the Operating LLC as a majority owned subsidiary. Whether or not we qualify under the 40% test is primarily based on whether the securities we hold in the Operating LLC are investment securities. If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and other matters. Such limitations could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. As of December 31, 2015, we are in compliance with and meet the Section 3(a)(1)(C) exclusion.

---

 

Insurance may be inadequate to cover risks facing the Company.

Our operations and financial results are subject to risks and uncertainties related to our use of a combination of insurance, self-insured retention and self-insurance for a number of risks, including most significantly: property and casualty, workers’ compensation, errors and omissions liability, general liability and the portion of employee-related health care benefits plans we fund, among others.

While we endeavor to purchase insurance coverage that is appropriate to our assessment of risk, we are unable to predict with certainty the frequency, nature or magnitude of claims for direct or consequential damages. Our business may be negatively affected if in the future our insurance proves to be inadequate or unavailable. In addition, insurance claims may harm our reputation or divert management resources away from operating our business.

Risks Related to Our Industry

The soundness of other financial institutions and intermediaries affects us.

We face the risk of operational failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries that we use to facilitate our securities transactions. As a result of the consolidation over the years among clearing agents, exchanges and clearing houses, our exposure to certain financial intermediaries has increased and could affect our ability to find adequate and cost-effective alternatives should the need arise. Any failure, termination or constraint of these intermediaries could adversely affect our ability to execute transactions, service our clients and manage our exposure to risk.

Our ability to engage in routine trading and funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, funding, counterparty or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mortgage originators and other institutional clients. Furthermore, although we do not hold any European sovereign debt, we may do business with and be exposed to financial institutions that have been affected by the recent European sovereign debt crisis. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about the financial condition of, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have historically led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due us. Although we have not suffered any material or significant losses as a result of the failure of any financial counterparty, any such losses in the future may materially adversely affect our results of operations.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and may face restrictions on, and examination of, the way we conduct certain of our operations.

Our business is subject to extensive government and other regulation, and our relationship with our broker-dealer clients may subject us to increased regulatory scrutiny. These regulations are designed to protect the interests of the investing public generally rather than our stockholders and may result in limitations on our activities. Governmental and self-regulatory organizations, including the SEC, FINRA, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and other agencies and securities exchanges such as the NYSE and NYSE MKT regulate the U.S. financial services industry, and regulate certain of our operations in the U.S. Some of our international operations are subject to similar regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including rules promulgated by the FCA, which apply to entities which are authorized and regulated by the FCA. These regulatory bodies are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of the securities and other financial markets and protecting the interests of investors in those markets. In addition, all records of registered investment advisors and broker-dealers are subject at any time, and from time to time, to examination by the SEC. Some aspects of the business that are subject to extensive regulation and/or examination by regulatory agencies, include:

---

 

The SEC, FINRA, the FCA and various other domestic and international regulatory agencies also have stringent rules and regulations with respect to the maintenance of specific levels of net capital by broker-dealers. Generally, in the U.S., a broker-dealer’s net capital is defined as its net worth, plus qualified subordinated debt, less deductions for certain types of assets. If these net capital rules are changed or expanded, or if there is an unusually large charge against net capital, our operations that require the intensive use of capital would be limited. Also, our ability to withdraw capital from our regulated subsidiaries is subject to restrictions, which in turn could limit our ability or that of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, repay debt, make distributions and redeem or purchase shares of our Common Stock or other equity interests in our subsidiaries. A large operating loss or charge against net capital could adversely affect our ability to expand or even maintain our expected levels of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we may become subject to net capital requirements in other foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. While we expect to maintain levels of capital in excess of regulatory minimums, we cannot predict our future capital needs or our ability to obtain additional financing.

If we or any of our subsidiaries fail to comply with any of these laws, rules or regulations, we or such subsidiary may be subject to censure, significant fines, cease-and-desist orders, suspension of business, suspensions of personnel or other sanctions, including revocation of registrations with FINRA, withdrawal of authorizations from the FCA or revocation of registrations with other similar international agencies to whose regulation we are subject, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. The adverse publicity arising from the imposition of sanctions against us by regulators, even if the amount of such sanctions is small, could harm our reputation and cause us to lose existing clients or fail to gain new clients.

The authority to operate as a broker-dealer in a jurisdiction is dependent on the registration or authorization in that jurisdiction or the maintenance of a proper exemption from such registration or authorization. Our ability to comply with all applicable laws and rules is largely dependent on our compliance, credit approval, audit and reporting systems and procedures, as well as our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. Any growth or expansion of our business may create additional strain on our compliance, credit approval, audit and reporting systems and procedures and could result in increased costs to maintain and improve such systems and procedures.

In addition, new laws or regulations or changes in the enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to us and our clients may adversely affect our business, and our ability to function in this environment will depend on our ability to constantly monitor and react to these changes. Such changes may cause us to change the way we conduct our business, both in the U.S. and internationally. The government agencies that regulate us have broad powers to investigate and enforce compliance and punish noncompliance with their rules, regulations and industry standards of practice. If we and our directors, officers and employees fail to comply with the rules and regulations of these government agencies, we and they may be subject to claims or actions by such agencies.

The Dodd-Frank Act and related regulations may negatively impact our business and financial results.

The Dodd-Frank Act, and related rulemakings, have instituted a wide range of reforms that have impacted financial services firms. The Dodd-Frank Act contains a comprehensive set of provisions designed to govern the practices and oversight of financial institutions and other participants in the financial markets. Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act (Volker Rule) and section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Act (swaps push-out rule) limit proprietary trading of certain securities and swaps by banking entities such as banks, bank holding companies and similar institutions. Although we are not a banking entity and are not otherwise subject to these rules, some of our clients and many of our counterparties are banks or entities affiliated with banks and will be subject to these restrictions. These sections of the Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations that are adopted to implement them could negatively affect the swaps and securities markets by reducing their depth and liquidity and thereby affect pricing in these markets. Other negative effects could result from an expansive extraterritorial application of the Dodd-Frank Act in general or the Volker Rule in particular and/or insufficient international coordination with respect to adoption of rules for derivatives and other financial reforms in other jurisdictions. We will not know the exact impact that these changes in the markets will have on our business until after the final rules are implemented.

The Dodd-Frank Act, in addressing systemic risks to the financial system, charges the Federal Reserve with drafting enhanced regulatory requirements for the systemically important bank holding companies and certain other nonbank financial companies designated as systemically important by the Financial Stability Oversight Council. The enhanced requirements proposed by the Federal Reserve include capital requirements, liquidity requirements, limits on credit exposure concentrations and risk management requirements. We do not believe that we will be deemed to be a systemically important nonbank financial company under the new legislation and therefore will not be directly impacted. However, there will be an indirect impact to us to the extent that the new regulations apply to our competitors, counterparts and certain of our clients. In addition, should any of the new legislation apply to us, if we were to fail to comply with such legislation and regulations, we may be subject to fines, penalties or material restrictions on our businesses in the jurisdiction where the violation occurred.

---

 

Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action could have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm, either of which could seriously harm our business.

We face substantial regulatory and litigation risks and conflicts of interests, and may face legal liability and reduced revenues and profitability if our business is not regarded as compliant or for other reasons. We are subject to extensive regulation, and many aspects of our business will subject us to substantial risks of liability. We engage in activities in connection with (1) the evaluation, negotiation, structuring, marketing, and sales and management of our investment funds and structured products, (2) our Capital Markets segment, (3) our asset management operations, and (4) our investment activities. Our activities may subject us to the risk of significant legal liabilities under securities or other laws for material omissions or material false or misleading statements made in connection with securities offerings and other transactions. In addition, to the extent our clients, or investors in our investment funds and structured products, suffer losses, they may claim those losses resulting from our or our officers’, directors’, employees’, or agents’ or affiliates’ breach of contract, fraud, negligence, willful misconduct or other similar misconduct, and may bring actions against us under federal or state securities or other applicable laws. Dissatisfied clients may also make claims regarding quality of trade execution, improperly settled trades, or mismanagement against us. We may become subject to these claims as the result of failures or malfunctions of electronic trading platforms or other brokerage services, including failures or malfunctions of third party providers’ systems which are beyond our control, and third parties may seek recourse against us for any losses. In addition, investors may claim breaches of collateral management agreements, which could lead to our termination as collateral manager under such agreements.

Following the start of the financial crisis in 2007, the volume of claims and amount of damages claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial advisors and asset managers increased. With respect to the asset management business, we make investment decisions on behalf of our clients that could result in, and in some instances in the past have resulted in, substantial losses. In addition, as a manager, we are responsible for clients’ compliance with regulatory requirements. Investment decisions we make on behalf of clients could cause such clients to fail to comply with regulatory requirements and could result in substantial losses. Although the management agreements generally include broad indemnities and provisions designed to limit our exposure to legal claims relating to our services, these provisions may not protect us or may not be enforced in all cases.

In addition, we are exposed to risks of litigation or investigation relating to transactions which present conflicts of interest that are not properly addressed. In such actions, we could be obligated to bear legal, settlement and other costs (which may be in excess of available insurance coverage). Also, with a workforce consisting of many very highly paid professionals, we may face the risk of lawsuits relating to claims for compensation, which may individually or in the aggregate be significant in amount. Similarly, certain corporate events, such as a reduction in our workforce or employee separations, could also result in additional litigation or arbitration. In addition, as a public company, we are subject to the risk of investigation or litigation by regulators or our public stockholders arising from an array of possible claims, including investor dissatisfaction with the performance of our business or our share price, allegations of misconduct by our officers and directors or claims that we inappropriately dealt with conflicts of interest or investment allocations. In addition, we may incur significant expenses in defending claims, even those without merit. If any claims brought against us result in a finding of substantial legal liability and/or require us to incur all or a portion of the costs arising out of litigation or investigation, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Such litigation or investigation, whether resolved in our favor or not or ultimately settled, could cause significant reputational harm, which could seriously harm our business.

The competitive pressures we face as a result of operating in a highly competitive market could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

A number of entities conduct asset management, origination, investment, and broker-dealer activities. We compete with public and private funds, REITS, commercial and investment banks, savings and loan institutions, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, institutional bankers, governmental bodies, commercial finance companies, traditional asset managers, brokerage firms and other entities.

Many firms offer similar and/or additional products and services to the same types of clients that we target or may target in the future. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have more relevant experience, have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources, and have more personnel than we have. There are few barriers to entry, including a relatively low cost of entering these lines of business, and the successful efforts of new entrants into our expected lines of business, including major banks and other financial institutions, may result in increased competition. Other industry participants may, from time to time, seek to recruit our investment professionals and other employees away from us.

With respect to our asset management activities, our competitors may have more extensive distribution capabilities, more effective marketing strategies, more attractive investment vehicle structures and broader name recognition than we do. Further, other investment managers may offer services at more competitive prices than we do, which could put downward pressure on our fee structure. With respect to our origination and investment activities, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds, enhanced operating efficiencies, and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher

---

 

risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than we can. The competitive pressures we face, if not effectively managed, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive asset management, origination and investment opportunities and, therefore, may not be able to identify and pursue opportunities that are consistent with our business objectives. Competition may limit the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us. It may also result in higher prices, lower yields and a narrower spread of yields over our borrowing costs, making it more difficult for us to acquire new investments on attractive terms. In addition, competition for desirable investments could delay the investment in desirable assets, which may in turn reduce our earnings per share.

With respect to our broker-dealer activities, our revenues could be adversely affected if large institutional clients that we have increase the amount of trading they do directly with each other rather than through our broker-dealers, decrease the amount of trading they do with our broker-dealers because they decide to trade more with our competitors, decrease their trading of certain over-the-counter (“OTC”) products in favor of exchange-traded products, or hire in-house professionals to handle trading that our broker-dealers would otherwise be engaged to do.

We have experienced intense price competition in our fixed income brokerage business in recent years. Some competitors may offer brokerage services to clients at lower prices than we offer, which may force us to reduce our prices or to lose market share and revenue. In addition, we intend to focus primarily on providing brokerage services in markets for less commoditized financial instruments. As the markets for these instruments become more commoditized, we could lose market share to other inter-dealer brokers, exchanges and electronic multi-dealer brokers who specialize in providing brokerage services in more commoditized markets. If a financial instrument for which we provide brokerage services becomes listed on an exchange or if an exchange introduces a competing product to the products we broker in the OTC market, the need for our services in relation to that instrument could be significantly reduced. Further, the recent consolidation among exchange firms, and expansion by these firms into derivative and other non-equity trading markets, will increase competition for customer trades and place additional pricing pressure on commissions and spreads.

Financial problems experienced by third parties could affect the markets in which we provide brokerage services. In addition, a disruption in the credit derivatives market could affect our net trading revenues.

Problems experienced by third parties could affect the markets in which we provide brokerage services. For example, in recent years, hedge funds have increasingly begun to make use of credit and other derivatives as part of their trading strategies. As a result, an increasing percentage of our business, directly or indirectly, resulted from trading activity by institutional investors. For example, hedge funds typically employ a significant amount of leverage to achieve their results and, in the past, certain hedge funds have had difficulty managing this leverage, which has resulted in market-wide disruptions. If one or more hedge funds that is a significant participant in a credit derivatives market experiences similar problems in the future, including as a result of the volatility in such market, that credit derivatives market could be adversely affected and, accordingly, our trading revenues in that credit derivatives market could decrease.

Employee misconduct or error, which can be difficult to detect and deter, could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain clients and by subjecting us to significant legal liability and reputational harm.

There have been a number of highly-publicized cases involving fraud, trading on material non-public information, or other misconduct by employees and others in the financial services industry, and there is a risk that our employees could engage in misconduct that adversely affects our business. For example, we may be subject to the risk of significant legal liabilities under securities or other laws for our employees’ material omissions or materially false or misleading statements in connection with securities and other transactions. In addition, our advisory business requires that we deal with confidential matters of great significance to our clients. If our employees were to improperly use or disclose confidential information provided by our clients, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions and could suffer serious harm to our reputation, financial position, current client relationships and ability to attract future clients. We are also subject to extensive regulation under securities laws and other laws in connection with our asset management business. Failure to comply with these legislative and regulatory requirements by any of our employees could adversely affect us and our clients. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and any precautions taken by us to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases.

Furthermore, employee errors, including mistakes in executing, recording or reporting transactions for clients (such as entering into transactions that clients may disavow and refuse to settle) could expose us to financial losses and could seriously harm our reputation and negatively affect our business. The risk of employee error or miscommunication may be greater for products that are new or have non-standardized terms.

---

 

Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure and Ownership of Our Common Stock

We are a holding company whose primary asset is membership units in the Operating LLC, and we are dependent on distributions from the Operating LLC to pay taxes and other obligations.

We are a holding company whose primary asset is membership units in the Operating LLC. Since the Operating LLC is a limited liability company taxed as a partnership, we, as a member of the Operating LLC, could incur tax obligations as a result of our allocable share of the income from the operations of the Operating LLC. In addition, we have convertible senior debt and junior subordinated notes outstanding. The Operating LLC will pay distributions to us in amounts necessary to satisfy our tax obligations and regularly scheduled payments of interest in connection with our convertible senior debt and our junior subordinated notes, and we are dependent on these distributions from the Operating LLC in order to generate the funds necessary to meet these obligations and liabilities. Industry conditions and financial, business and other factors will affect our ability to generate the cash flows we need to make these distributions. There may be circumstances under which the Operating LLC may be restricted from paying dividends to us under applicable law or regulation (for example due to Delaware limited liability company act limitations on the Operating LLC’s ability to make distributions if liabilities of the Operating LLC after the distribution would exceed the value of the Operating LLC’s assets).

As a holding company that does not conduct business operations in its own right, substantially all of the assets of the Company are comprised of our majority ownership interest in the Operating LLC. The Company’s ability to pay dividends to our stockholders will be dependent on distributions we receive from the Operating LLC and subject to the Operating LLC’s operating agreement (the “Operating LLC Agreement”). The amount and timing of distributions by the Operating LLC will be at the discretion of the Operating LLC’s board of managers, which is comprised of the same individuals that serve on our board of directors.

Certain subsidiaries of the Operating LLC have restrictions on the withdrawal of capital and otherwise in making distributions and loans. JVB is subject to net capital restrictions imposed by the SEC and FINRA, which require certain minimum levels of net capital to remain in JVB. In addition, these restrictions could potentially impose notice requirements or limit the Company’s ability to withdraw capital above the required minimum amounts (excess capital) whether through distribution or loan. CCFL is regulated by the FCA in the United Kingdom and must maintain certain minimum levels of capital but will allow withdrawal of excess capital without restriction.

Daniel G. Cohen, our vice chairman, may have ownership interests in the Operating LLC and competing duties to other entities that could create potential conflicts of interest and may result in decisions that are not in the best interests of other IFMI stockholders.

Daniel G. Cohen, our vice chairman, through an entity he wholly owns, Cohen Bros. Financial, LLC (“CBF”), owns 4,983,557 units, or 26.9%, of the membership interests in the Operating LLC and has a majority of the voting power of the Operating LLC members other than IFMI. Additionally, Mr. Cohen owns 9.0% of our Common Stock, and, as noted above, Mr. Cohen may control certain actions of the Company. As an owner of interests in the Operating LLC, Mr. Cohen may have interests that differ from the stockholders of the Company, including in circumstances in which there may be tax consequence to the members of the Operating LLC. As a result of his ownership in both the Operating LLC and the Company, it is possible that Mr. Cohen as a shareholder of the Company could approve or reject actions based on his own interests as a stockholder that may or may not be in the best interests of the other IFMI stockholders.

Daniel G. Cohen and other executive officers and directors exercise significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval.

In addition to the 9% of our Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2015 beneficially owned by Daniel G. Cohen, our vice chairman, Mr. Cohen beneficially owns 4,983,557 shares of our Series E preferred stock, which have no economic rights, but entitle him to vote together with our stockholders on all matters presented to the stockholders. When factoring in the Series E preferred stock, Mr. Cohen controls approximately 33.7% of total shares outstanding that are entitled to vote. Except with respect to certain agreements relating to the election of Mr. Cohen to our board of directors, there are no voting agreements or other arrangements or understandings among Mr. Cohen,  and our other directors and executive officers with respect to our equity securities; however, to the extent that Mr. Cohen and our other directors and executive officers vote their shares in the same manner, their combined stock ownership and voting rights will have a significant or even decisive effect on the election of all of the directors and the approval of matters that are presented to our stockholders. Collectively, Mr. Cohen and our directors and officers control approximately 38.3% of our total shares outstanding entitled to vote. Their ownership may discourage someone from making a significant equity investment in us, even if we needed the investment to operate our business. The size of their combined stock holdings could be a significant factor in delaying or preventing a change of control transaction that other of our stockholders may deem to be in their best interests, such as a transaction in which the other stockholders would receive a premium for their shares over their then current market prices.

---

 

On several occasions, our board of directors has declared cash dividends. Any future distributions to our stockholders will depend upon certain factors affecting our operating results, some of which are beyond our control.

Our ability to make and sustain cash distributions is based on many factors, including the return on our investments, operating expense levels and certain restrictions imposed by Maryland law. Some of these factors are beyond our control and a change in any such factor could affect our ability to make distributions in the future. We may not be able to make distributions. Our stockholders should rely on increases, if any, in the price of our Common Stock for any return on their investment. Furthermore, we are dependent on distributions from the Operating LLC to be able to make distributions. See the risk factor above titled “We are a holding company whose primary asset is membership units in the Operating LLC and we are dependent on distributions from the Operating LLC to pay taxes and other obligations.”

Future sales of our Common Stock in the public market could lower the price of our Common Stock and impair our ability to raise funds in future securities offerings.

Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the then prevailing market price of our Common Stock and could make it more difficult for us to raise funds in the future through a public offering of our securities.

Your percentage ownership in the Company may be diluted in the future.

Your percentage ownership in the Company may be diluted in the future because of equity awards that have been, or may be, granted to our directors, officers and employees. We have adopted equity compensation plans that provide for the grant of equity based awards, including restricted stock, stock options and other equity-based awards to our directors, officers and other employees, advisors and consultants. At December 31, 2015, we had 315,434 shares of restricted stock, 500,000 of restricted units, and 3,192,857 stock options outstanding to employees and directors of the Company and there were 906,154 shares available for future awards under our equity compensation plans. Vesting of restricted stock and stock option grants is generally contingent upon performance conditions and/or service conditions. Vesting of those shares of restricted units and stock would dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders. Equity awards will continue to be a source of compensation for employees and directors.

If we raise additional capital, we expect it will be necessary for us to issue additional equity or convertible debt securities. If we issue equity or convertible debt securities, the price at which we offer such securities may not bear any relationship to our value, the net tangible book value per share may decrease, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders would be diluted, and any equity securities we may issue in such offering or upon conversion of convertible debt securities issued in such offering, may have rights, preferences or privileges with respect to liquidation, dividends, redemption, voting and other matters that are senior to or more advantageous than our Common Stock. If we finance acquisitions by issuing equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, our existing stockholders will also be diluted.

The issuance of the shares of the Company’s Common Stock upon the conversion, if any, of the notes originally purchased by Mead Park Capital and EBC, as assignee of CBF, which have been subsequently sold to the Edward E. Cohen IRA, may cause substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and may cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.

In connection with the investments by Mead Park Capital Partners, LLC (“Mead Park Capital”) and EBC 2013 Family Trust (“EBC”), as assignee of CBF, in September 2013 pursuant to the definitive agreements, the Company issued $8,247,501 in aggregate principal amount of the 8% convertible senior promissory notes (the “8.0% Convertible Notes”). The 8.0% Convertible Notes are convertible into a maximum aggregate amount of 3,697,034 shares of the Company’s Common Stock assuming none of the interest under the 8.0% Convertible Notes is paid to the holders thereof in cash. If the holders of the 8.0% Convertible Notes elect to convert such notes into shares of our Common Stock, our existing stockholders may be substantially diluted and the price of our Common Stock may decline.

The resale of the shares of our Common Stock by the Edward E. Cohen IRA and/or EBC could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales.

In connection the registration rights agreement, dated May 9, 2013, which the Company entered into with Mead Park Capital and CBF, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC registering the resale of all of the shares of our Common Stock issued or issuable to Mead Park Capital and EBC, as assignee of CBF, under the definitive agreements and the 8.0% Convertible Notes, respectively. On August 28, 2015, Mead Park Capital sold $4,385,628 of the 8.0% Convertible Notes and 1,461,876 shares of Common Stock to the Edward E. Cohen IRA of which Edward E. Cohen is the benefactor. Edward E. Cohen is the father of Daniel G. Cohen. There sale of such shares of our Common Stock by the Edward E. Cohen IRA could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales. 

---

 

Availability of net operating losses may be reduced by a change in ownership.

In connection with the sale of Common Stock and the 8.0% Convertible Notes by Mead Park Capital to the Edward E. Cohen IRA, the Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated May 9, 2013, by and between the Company and Computershare Shareowner Services LLC was terminated. Such agreement was designed to protect stockholder value by attempting to protect against a possible limitation on the Company’s ability to use its deferred tax assets to reduce potential future federal income tax obligations. The Company may be limited if it experiences an “ownership change” (as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code), which may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the Common Stock by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. If we were to experience an ownership change, utilization of our NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation that may be carried over to later years within the allowed NOL carryforward period. Notwithstanding, over the entire carryforward period, we may not be able to use all our NOLs due to the aforementioned annual limitation.

Any decrease in the federal statutory tax rate, or other changes in federal tax statutes, could also cause a reduction in the economic benefit of the NOL currently available to us.

The Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”), provisions in our charter and bylaws, and our stockholder rights plan may prevent takeover attempts that could be beneficial to our stockholders.

Provisions of the MGCL and our charter and bylaws could discourage a takeover of us even if a change of control would be beneficial to the interests of our stockholders. These statutory, charter and bylaw provisions include the following:

The market price of our Common Stock may be volatile and may be affected by market conditions beyond our control.

The market price of our Common Stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to, among other factors:

In addition, if the market for stocks in our industry, or the stock market in general, experience a loss of investor confidence, the market price of our Common Stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause the price of our Common Stock to fall and may expose us to lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to the board of directors and management.

---

 

Our Common Stock may be delisted, which may have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and value of our Common Stock.

To maintain our listing on the NYSE MKT, we must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria. In addition, our Common Stock recently has sold and may continue to sell at a low price per share. On March 7 2016 the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE MKT was $0.81 per share. As a result, we may be subject to delisting by the NYSE MKT if our Common Stock continues to sell for a substantial period of time at a low price per share, and we fail to effect a reverse split within a reasonable time after being notified that the NYSE MKT deems such action to be appropriate. The market price of our Common Stock has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuation as a result of periodic variations in our revenues and results of operations. If we violate the NYSE MKT listing requirements, our Common Stock may be delisted. If we fail to meet any of the NYSE MKT’s listing standards, our Common Stock may be delisted. In addition, our board may determine that the cost of maintaining our listing on a national securities exchange outweighs the benefits of such listing. A delisting of our Common Stock from the NYSE MKT may materially impair our stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our Common Stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our Common Stock. In addition, the delisting of our Common Stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital.

Because our Common Stock is deemed a low-priced “penny” stock, an investment in our Common Stock should be considered high risk and subject to marketability restrictions.

Since our Common Stock is a penny stock, as defined in Rule 3a51-1 under the Exchange Act, it will be more difficult for investors to liquidate their investment in our Common Stock. Until the trading price of our Common Stock rises above $5.00 per share, if ever, trading in our Common Stock is subject to the penny stock rules of the Exchange Act specified in Rules 15g-1 through 15g-10. Those rules require broker-dealers, before effecting transactions in any penny stock, to:

Consequently, the penny stock rules may restrict the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our Common Stock and may affect the ability of holders to sell their Common Stock in the secondary market and the price at which such holders can sell any such securities. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.   

  

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

---

 

ITEM 2.           PROPERTIES.

The following table lists our current leases as of December 31, 2015. 

 

 

 

(1) For purposes of this table, the term “Fully Subleased” means we no longer occupy the space and we sublease the space to a third party; “Partially Occupied / Partially Subleased” means we occupy a portion of the space and sublease the remaining portion to a third party or third parties; and “Occupied” means we fully utilize the space for our operations.

The properties that we occupy are used either by the Company’s Capital Markets business segment or Asset Management business segment or both business segments. We believe that the facilities we occupy are suitable and adequate for our current operations. 

ITEM  3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

The Company’s former U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, Cohen & Company Securities, LLC (“CCS”), and one of its registered investment adviser subsidiaries, CIRA SCM, LLC (“CIRA”), were parties to litigation commenced on June 7, 2013, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, captioned NRAM PLC (f/k/a Northern Rock (Asset Management) PLC) v. Société Générale Corporate and Investment Banking, et al.  The litigation settled in December 2015, and CCS and CIRA, which were indemnified parties, received full releases pursuant to the settlement agreement.  On December 29, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Discontinuance discontinuing the litigation with prejudice.

In October 2013, the Company received a Pennsylvania corporate net income tax assessment from the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue in the amount of $4,683 (including penalties) plus interest related to a subsidiary of AFN for the 2009 tax year.  The assessment denied this subsidiary’s Keystone Opportunity Zone (“KOZ”) credit for that year.  The Company filed an administrative appeal of this assessment with the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue Board of Appeals, which was denied in June 2014.  The Company filed an appeal with the Pennsylvania Board of Finance and Revenue, which was also denied in May 2015.  The Company has filed an appeal with the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court.  The Company has evaluated the assessment in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740 and determined not to record any contingent liability for this assessment. 

In addition to the matters set forth above, the Company is a party to various routine legal proceedings, claims, and regulatory inquiries arising out of the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Management believes that the results of these routine legal proceedings, claims, and regulatory matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, or on the Company’s operations and cash flows. However, the Company cannot estimate the legal fees and expenses to be incurred in connection with these routine matters and, therefore, is unable to determine whether these future legal fees and expenses will have a material impact on the Company’s operations and cash flows. It is the Company’s policy to expense legal and other fees as incurred.

ITEM  4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not Applicable.

 

 

---

 

PART II

ITEM  5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information for Our Common Stock and Dividends

The closing price of our Common Stock was $0.81 on March 7, 2016. We had 14,003,862 shares of Common Stock outstanding held by approximately 31 holders of record as of March 7, 2016.

Commencing on March 22, 2004, our Common Stock began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “SFO.” On October 6, 2006, upon completion of our merger with Alesco Financial Trust and our name change from Sunset Financial Resources, Inc. to Alesco Financial Inc., our NYSE symbol was changed to “AFN.”

On December 16, 2009, we effectuated a 1-for-10 reverse stock split immediately prior to consummation of the Merger. Upon completion of the Merger, our name changed from Alesco Financial Inc. to Cohen & Company Inc., we moved our listing of Common Stock from the NYSE to the NYSE MKT LLC (formerly known as NYSE Amex LLC), and our trading symbol was changed to “COHN.”

Effective January 21, 2011, we changed our name to Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. and our Common Stock began trading on the NYSE MKT LLC under the symbol “IFMI.”

The following sets forth the high and low sale prices of our Common Stock for the quarterly period indicated as reported on the NYSE Amex LLC from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015 and the cash dividends declared per share.

 

 

 

During 2014, the Company’s board of directors declared a $0.02 dividend on each of March 4, 2014, May 1, 2014, July 31, 2014, and October 31, 2014, payable to stockholders of record as of March 18, 2014, May 16, 2014, August 15, 2014, and November 14, 2014 respectively, payable on April 1, 2014, May 30, 2014, August 29, 2014, and November 28, 2014, respectively.

During 2015, the Company’s board of directors declared a $0.02 dividend on each of March 5, 2015, May 4, 2015, July 30, 2015, and October 29, 2015, payable to stockholders of record as of March 19, 2015, May 19, 2015, August 14, 2015, and November 13, 2015 respectively, payable on April 2, 2015, June 2, 2015, August 28, 2015, and November 27, 2015, respectively.

On March 8, 2016, the Company’s board of directors declared a $0.02 dividend payable to stockholders of record as of March 23, 2016, payable on April 6, 2016.

The Company’s board of directors has the power to decide to increase, reduce, or eliminate dividends in the future.  The board’s decision will depend on a variety of factors, including business, financial, and regulatory consideration as well as any limitations under Maryland law or imposed by any agreements governing indebtedness of the Company.

 

---

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

 

(1)   See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)On August 3, 2007, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to $50 million of our Common Stock from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase plan was publicly announced on August 7, 2007. 

 

---

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following selected financial data is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

You should read this selected financial data together with the more detailed information contained in our consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 42.  

 

 

 

---

 

(1)During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recognized an impairment charge of $3,121, related to the Cira SCM goodwill. The charge was included in the consolidated statements of operations as impairment of goodwill and was reflected as component of operating expenses. See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)Other income / (expense) is comprised of the following:

 

 

 

The gain / (loss) on repurchase of debt was comprised of the following:

(a) In November 2011, we repurchased $1,025 aggregate principal amount of previously issued notes from unrelated third parties for $988 including accrued interest. We recognized a gain from repurchase of debt of $33, which was included as a separate component of non-operating income / (expense) in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

(b) In March 2012, we repurchased $150 aggregate principal amount of the previously issued notes from an unrelated third party for $151, including accrued interest of $4. We recognized a gain from repurchase of debt of $3, which was included as a separate component of non-operating income / (expense) in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

(c) In September 2012, we repurchased $1,177 principal amount of outstanding subordinated notes payable from an unrelated third party for $1,139, including accrued cash interest and paid in kind interest of $50. We recognized a gain from repurchase of debt of $83, net of expenses, which was included as a separate component of non-operating income / (expense) in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

(d)  In October 2013, we repurchased $5,000 principal amount of the 10.50% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes Due 2027 (“10.5% Convertible Notes”) from an unrelated third party for par plus accrued interest.  The loss represented the recognition of the remaining unamortized discount on the 10.5% Convertible Notes. 

See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

Other income / (expense) comprised the following:

(a) During the second quarter of 2012, CCS and the liquidation trustee in the Sentinel litigation reached an agreement in principle to settle such litigation. The settlement agreement called for CCS to make an initial payment of $3,000 and an additional payment of $2,250 in the future. As a result of the settlement agreement, we accrued a contingent liability of $4,357 representing the initial payment of $3,000, the discounted present value of the future payment of $1,978, partially offset by additional estimated insurance proceeds receivable of $621. This expense was included in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a component of non-operating income / (expense).

(3)The redeemable non-controlling interest represents the equity interests of PrinceRidge that were not owned by us. The members of PrinceRidge had the right to withdraw from PrinceRidge and require PrinceRidge to redeem the interests for cash over a contractual payment period. The Company accounted for these interests as temporary equity under Accounting Series Release 268 (“ASR 268”). These interests are shown outside of permanent equity of IFMI in its consolidated balance sheet as redeemable non-controlling interest. Since December 31, 2013, the Company has owned 100% of PrinceRidge and no redeemable non-controlling interest remains outstanding.  See notes 3-O and 18.

---

 

 

 ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate these estimates, including fair value of financial instruments. These estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

All amounts in this disclosure are in thousands (except share and per share data) unless otherwise noted.

Overview

We are a financial services company specializing in fixed income markets. We were founded in 1999 as an investment firm focused on small-cap banking institutions, but have grown to provide an expanding range of capital markets and asset management services. We are organized into three business segments: Capital Markets, Principal Investing, and Asset Management.

•  Capital Markets:  Our Capital Markets business segment consists primarily of fixed income sales, trading, and financing, as well as new issue placements in corporate and securitized products, and advisory services. Our fixed income sales and trading group provides trade execution to corporate investors, institutional investors, mortgage originators, and other smaller broker-dealers. We specialize in a variety of products, including but not limited to: corporate bonds, ABS, MBS, CMBS, RMBS, CDOs, CLOs, CBOs, CMOs, municipal securities, TBAs and other forward agency MBS contracts, SBA loans, U.S. government bonds, U.S. government agency securities, brokered deposits and CDs for small banks, and hybrid capital of financial institutions including TruPS, whole loans, and other structured financial instruments. We also offer execution and brokerage services for equity products. We carry out our capital market activities primarily through our subsidiaries: JVB in the United States and CCFL in Europe. See the discussion below regarding the merger of JVB and CCPR in 2014 and the potential sale of CCFL. 

•  Principal Investing:  Our Principal Investing business segment is comprised of investments that we have made using our own capital excluding investments we make to support our Capital Markets business segment.  Historically, we generally made principal investments in the entities we managed.  Beginning in the first quarter of 2014, we began investing our capital in investments (primarily equity tranches of CLOs) that we do not manage. These investments are a component of our other investments, at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet  We did not make any new CLO investments in 2015.

•Asset Management: Our Asset Management business segment manages assets within CDOs, permanent capital vehicles, managed accounts, and investment funds (collectively, “Investment Vehicles”). A CDO is a form of secured borrowing. The borrowing is secured by different types of fixed income assets such as corporate or mortgage loans or bonds. The borrowing is in the form of a securitization, which means that the lenders are actually investing in notes backed by the assets. In the event of default, the lenders will have recourse only to the assets securing the loan. Our Asset Management business segment includes our fee-based asset management operations, which include on-going base and incentive management fees. As of December 31, 2015, we had approximately $3.91 billion in AUM of which 95.8%, or $3.75 billion, was in CDOs. Almost all of our asset management revenue is earned from the management of CDOs.  We have not completed a new securitization since 2008.  As a result, our asset management revenue has declined from its historical highs as the assets of the CDOs decline as a result of maturities, repayments, auction call redemptions, and defaults.  We do not expect to complete any securitizations in the future so we expect our asset management revenue to continue to decline in the future. 

We generate our revenue by business segment primarily through the following activities.

Capital Markets:

•Our trading activities, which include execution and brokerage services, securities lending activities, riskless trading activities, as well as gains and losses (unrealized and realized) and income and expense earned on securities classified as trading; and

•New issue and advisory revenue comprised of (a) new issue revenue associated with originating, arranging, or placing newly created financial instruments; and (b) revenue from advisory services.

---

 

 

Principal Investing:

•Gains and losses (unrealized and realized) and income and expense earned on securities classified as other investments, at fair value; and

•  Income or loss from equity method affiliates.

 

Asset Management:

•  Asset management fees for our on-going asset manager services provided to various Investment Vehicles, which may include fees both senior and subordinate to the securities issued by the Investment Vehicle;

•Incentive management fees earned based on the performance of the various Investment Vehicles; and

•  income or loss from equity method affiliates.

Business Environment

Our business is materially affected by economic conditions in the financial markets, political conditions, broad trends in business and finance, changes in volume and price levels of securities transactions, and changes in interest rates, all of which can affect our profitability and are unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors and companies, including their level of participation in the financial markets and their willingness to participate in corporate transactions. Severe market fluctuations or weak economic conditions could continue to reduce our trading volume and revenues, negatively affect our ability to generate new issue and advisory revenue, and adversely affect our profitability.

The markets remain uneven and vulnerable to changes in investor sentiment. We believe the general business environment will continue to be challenging into the foreseeable future.

A portion of our revenues is generated from net trading activity. We engage in proprietary trading for our own account, provide securities financing for our customers, as well as execute “riskless” trades with a customer order in hand resulting in limited market risk to us. The inventory of securities held for our own account, as well as held to facilitate customer trades, and our market making activities are sensitive to market movements.

A portion of our revenues is generated from new issue and advisory engagements. The fees charged and volume of these engagements is sensitive to the overall business environment. During the first quarter of 2014, we stopped providing investment banking and advisory services in the United States as a result of the loss of certain of JVB’s former employees. Currently, JVB’s primary source of new issue revenue is our SBA group’s participation in COOF Securitizations. The SBA secondary market program allows for the purchaser of a SBA loan certificate to “strip” a portion of the interest rate from a guaranteed loan portion, creating what is called an originator fee or interest only strip. This enhances the ability of SBA pool assemblers to securitize the guaranteed portion of loans that do not have the same interest rate. Our SBA group’s participation in this area has grown during recent years.

A portion of our revenues is generated from management fees. Our ability to charge management fees and the amount of those fees is dependent upon the underlying investment performance and stability of the Investment Vehicles. If these types of investments do not provide attractive returns to investors, the demand for such instruments will likely fall, thereby reducing our opportunity to earn new management fees or maintain existing management fees.  As of December 31, 2015,  95.8% of our existing AUM were CDOs. The creation of CDOs and permanent capital vehicles has depended upon a vibrant securitization market. Since 2008, volumes within the securitization market have dropped significantly and have not recovered since that time. Consequently, we have been unable to complete a new securitization since 2008.

A portion of our revenues is generated from our principal investing activities. Therefore, our revenues are impacted by the underlying operating results of these investments.  As of December 31, 2015, our total other investments, at fair value (which represents our principal investments) was $14,880.  Of this amount, $11,569, or 77.7%, represented investments in CLOs.  The value of these investments is impacted by the performance of the underlying loans in these CLOs as well as the overall CLO market. 

Margin Pressures in Fixed Income Brokerage Business

Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the overall strength of the economy and financial market activity. Overall market conditions are a product of many factors beyond our control and can be unpredictable. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors including the volatility of the equity and fixed income markets, the level and shape of the various yield curves, and the volume and value of trading in securities.

 

---

 

Margins and volumes in certain products and markets within the fixed income brokerage business continue to decrease materially as competition has increased and general market activity has declined. Further, we continue to expect that competition will increase over time, resulting in continued margin pressure.

Our response to this margin compression has included: (i) building a diversified fixed income trading platform; (ii) expanding our European advisory and new issue capabilities; (iii) acquiring new product lines; (iv) building a hedging execution and funding operation to service mortgage originators; and (v) monitoring our fixed costs. Our cost reduction initiatives are ongoing. However, there can be no certainty that these efforts will be sufficient. If insufficient, we will likely see a decline in profitability. In January 2014, we completed the combination of our two U.S. broker-dealers to reduce overlapping business lines and to reduce our costs. 

Legislation Affecting the Financial Services Industry

In July 2010, the federal government passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Dodd-Frank Act significantly restructures and intensifies regulation in the financial services industry, with provisions that include, among other things, the creation of a new systemic risk oversight body (i.e., the Financial Stability Oversight Council), expansion of the authority of existing regulators, increased regulation of and restrictions on OTC derivatives markets and transactions, broadening of the reporting and regulation of executive compensation, expansion of the standards for market participants in dealing with clients and customers, and regulation of fiduciary duties owed by municipal advisors or conduit borrowers of municipal securities. In addition, Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act (known as the “Volker Rule”) and section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Act (known as the “swaps push-out rule”) limit proprietary trading of certain securities and swaps by certain banking entities. Although we are not a banking entity and are not otherwise subject to these rules, some of our clients and many of our counterparties are banks or entities affiliated with banks and will be subject to these restrictions.  These sections of the Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations that are adopted to implement them could negatively affect the swaps and securities markets by reducing their depth and liquidity and thereby affect pricing in these markets.  Further, the Dodd-Frank Act as a whole and the intensified regulatory environment will likely alter certain business practices and change the competitive landscape of the financial services industry, which may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  We will continue to monitor all applicable developments in the implementation of Dodd-Frank and expect to adapt successfully to any new applicable legislative and regulatory requirements.

Recent Events

 

Sale of European Operations

 

On August 19, 2014, we entered into the European Sale Agreement to sell our European operations to C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC, an entity controlled by Daniel G. Cohen, president and chief executive of our European operations and vice chairman of our board of directors, for approximately $8,700. The transaction was subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approval from the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). On March 26, 2015, the parties to the European Sale Agreement agreed to extend the deadline for the closing of the transactions contemplated by the European Sale Agreement from March 31, 2015 to June 30, 2015. In addition, the parties to the European Sale Agreement amended the date on which C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC was obligated to cause the settlement of the Intercompany Payables from March 31, 2015 to June 30, 2015.

On June 30, 2015, the parties to the European Sale Agreement agreed to extend the deadline for the closing of the transaction from June 30, 2015 to December 31, 2015 and the settlement date of the Intercompany Payables from June 30, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Second Extension”).  In connection with the Second Extension, the parties to the European Sale Agreement agreed that if the European Sale Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms prior to the closing, then (i) Mr. Cohen will pay $600 in respect of a portion of the legal and financial advisory fees and expenses incurred by us and the special committee of our board of directors in connection with the transactions contemplated by the European Sale Agreement since April 1, 2014 and (ii) an amendment (the “Employment Agreement Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2013, among the Operating LLC, the Company, Mr. Cohen and J.V.B. Financial Group Holdings, LP (formerly known as C&Co/PrinceRidge Holdings LP) (the “Employment Agreement”), would become effective. The Cohen Employment Agreement Amendment would provide that if Mr. Cohen’s employment was terminated by the Operating LLC without cause or by Mr. Cohen for good reason (as such terms are defined in the Cohen Employment Agreement), the Operating LLC would pay Mr. Cohen a maximum of $1,000 as a severance benefit. The Cohen Employment Agreement currently provides that in the event of such termination, the Operating LLC will pay Mr. Cohen a minimum of $3,000 as a severance benefit.

The European Sale Agreement provides that either party may terminate the agreement after December 31, 2015. On February 18, 2016, C&Co Europe Acquisition LLC provided notice to the Operating LLC that it continues to evaluate the transaction. To date, neither party has terminated the European Sale Agreement, and the Company and the Operating LLC continue to evaluate the transaction.

 

---

 

 

Section 382 Rights Agreement

 

On August 28, 2015, our board of directors approved the redemption of all of the rights outstanding under the Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated May 9, 2013, by and between the Company and Computershare Shareowner Services LLC (the “Rights Agreement”).  The redemption immediately terminated all rights to exercise the rights and effectively terminated the Rights Agreement. Pursuant to the redemption, the Company paid to the holders of the rights a redemption price equal to $0.001 per right, in cash, on September 8, 2015, for an aggregate amount of $15.  See note 19 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Other Significant Security Transactions

 

As previously disclosed, in September 2013, Mead Park Capital purchased $5,848 of 8.0% Convertible Notes and 1,949,167 shares of our Common Stock from us.  Jack J. DiMaio, Jr., the chairman of our board of directors and Christopher Ricciardi, a former member of our board of directors, were members of Mead Park Capital. 

On August 28, 2015, Mead Park Capital sold $4,386 of the 8.0% Convertible Notes issued to it in September 2013 and 1,461,876 shares of our Common Stock also issued to it in September 2013 to certain accounts controlled by family members of Daniel G. Cohen, the vice chairman of our board of directors and the board of managers of the Operating LLC, president and chief executive officer of our European business, and president of CCFL.  The Common Stock and 8.0% Convertible Notes sold in the transaction represented substantially all of our securities beneficially owned by Mr. DiMaio.  Mr. Ricciardi did not sell any our Common Stock or 8.0% Convertible Notes beneficially owned by him as part of this transaction.  Further as a result of the transaction, Mr. DiMaio was no longer a member of Mead Park Capital.   Mr. DiMaio remains the chairman of our board of directors.  At the time of this transaction, Mr. Ricciardi was the sole member and manager of Mead Park Capital. 

 

On October 16, 2015, the Company entered into a Termination and Release Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”), by and among the Company; Christopher Ricciardi, a member of the Company’s board of directors at the time; Stephanie Ricciardi, Mr. Ricciardi’s spouse; and the Ricciardi Family Foundation, a New York charitable not-for-profit corporation of which Mr. and Mrs. Ricciardi serve as directors (together with Stephanie Ricciardi and Christopher Ricciardi, the “Ricciardi Parties”); and Mead Park Capital.

 

Pursuant to the Termination Agreement, in connection with the termination of the Mead Park Purchase Agreement (as defined below) and all rights and obligations thereunder and the mutual release of claims set forth in the Termination Agreement, on October 16, 2015: (i) Mead Park Capital transferred to us 487,291 shares of the our Common Stock; (ii) the Ricciardi Parties transferred to us 1,512,709 shares of our Common Stock; (iii) we and Mead Park Capital terminated in its entirety, effective October 16, 2015, that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2013, by and among us, Mead Park Capital and, solely for purposes of Section 6.3 thereof, Mead Park Holdings LP (the “Mead Park Purchase Agreement”); and (iv) we transferred $4,000 in cash to accounts designated by Mr. Ricciardi for the benefit of the Ricciardi Parties and Mead Park Capital.

 

The Termination Agreement provides that, during the period beginning on October 16, 2015 and ending on October 16, 2016 (the “Termination Agreement Period”), if IFMI or its majority owned subsidiary, IFMI, LLC, makes any public or nonpublic offering or sale of any securities (“New Securities”), subject to certain exceptions, then Mr. Ricciardi will be afforded the opportunity to acquire, for the same price and on the same terms as the New Securities are proposed to be offered to others, up to the amount of New Securities required to enable Mr. Ricciardi to maintain his proportionate equivalent interest in us immediately prior to any such issuance of New Securities.

 

In addition, pursuant to the Termination Agreement, if, during the Termination Agreement Period, any meeting occurs at which the our stockholders vote for the election of our directors, then (i) our board of directors will nominate Mr. Ricciardi to stand for election to the board at such meeting; and (ii) our board of directors will (a) recommend to our stockholders the election of Mr. Ricciardi at such meeting, and (b) solicit proxies for Mr. Ricciardi in connection with such meeting to the same extent as it does for any of its other nominees to our board of directors.

 

At our annual meeting of stockholders held on December 21, 2015, Mr. Ricciardi was not reelected to serve as a member of our board of directors.  

 

The Termination Agreement contains standstill provisions applicable to each of Mead Park Capital and the Ricciardi Parties, subject to limited exceptions.

 

---

 

 

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following section provides a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the specified periods. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2014 

The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.  

 

Revenues

Revenues decreased by $9,594, or 17%, to $46,156 for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $55,750 for the year ended December 31, 2014. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) an increase of $2,970 in net trading; (ii) a decrease of $4,814 in asset management revenue; (iii) an increase of $151 in new issue and advisory revenue; and (iv) a decrease of $7,901 in principal transactions and other income.

---

 

Net Trading

Net trading revenue increased by $2,970, or 11%, to $31,026 for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $28,056 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The increase was primarily the result of increases in our mortgage, corporate investment grade, corporate high yield, and SBA asset classes partially offset by decreases in CLO trading, structured notes, municipal securities, and other asset classes.

Our net trading revenue includes unrealized gains on our trading investments, as of the applicable measurement date that may never be realized due to changes in market or other conditions not in our control.  This may adversely affect the ultimate value realized from these investments. In addition, our net trading revenue also includes realized gains on certain proprietary trading positions. Our ability to derive trading gains from such trading positions is subject to overall market conditions. Due to volatility and uncertainty in the capital markets, the net trading revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015 may not be indicative of future results. Furthermore, from time to time, some of the assets included in the Investments-trading line of our consolidated balance sheets represent level 3 valuations within the FASB fair value hierarchy. Level 3 assets are carried at fair value based on estimates derived using internal valuation models and other estimates. See notes 8 and 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The fair value estimates made by us may not be indicative of the final sale price at which these assets may be sold.

Asset Management

Assets Under Management

Our AUM equals the sum of: (1) the gross assets included in CDOs that we have sponsored and manage; plus (2) the NAV of the permanent capital vehicles and investment funds we manage; plus (3) the NAV of other accounts we manage. Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations used by other asset managers and, as a result, this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. This definition of AUM is not necessarily identical to a definition of AUM that may be used in our management agreements.

 

 

 

---

 

 

Asset management fees decreased by $4,814, or 33%, to $9,682 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $14,496 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as discussed in more detail below. The following table provides a more detailed comparison of the two periods.

CDOs

Asset management revenue from company-sponsored CDOs decreased by $2,321 to $8,678 for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $10,999 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The following table summarizes the periods presented by asset class. 

 

Asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – U.S. declined primarily because in May 2014 and October 2014, two securitizations that we managed had successful auctions and terminated.  We will no longer earn fees related to these securitizations going forward.  We earned a total of $903 in revenue from these two securitizations for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Asset management fees for high grade and mezzanine ABS declined primarily due to the transfer of certain management contracts to a third party and the liquidation of one CDO. As of December 31, 2015, we no longer manage any CDOs in this asset class.  We do not expect to earn material management fees in the future from this asset class. 

Asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – Europe declined because of both (i) the decline of collateral balances due to principal payments and defaults and (ii) the impact of foreign exchange rates as these contracts make management fee payments in Euros.

Asset management fees for broadly syndicated loans – Europe consist of a single CLO.  Fees declined because the reinvestment period has ended for this CLO.  Following the end of such reinvestment period, principal payments received are paid out to investors in the CLO.  The fees we earn will decline as the collateral balances decline.  Additionally, this contract also makes management fee payments in Euros, which negatively impacted the revenue earned.

A significant portion of our managed CDOs have stopped paying subordinated management fees due to diversion of cash flows called for within the CDO governing documents.  See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Revenue Recognition – Asset Management” beginning on page 68 for discussion of our accounting policy regarding recognition of revenue related to subordinated management fees. 

Other

Other asset management revenue decreased by $2,493 to $1,004 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $3,497 for the year ended December 31, 2014.    The decrease was comprised of (i) a decrease of $125 resulting from the sale of Star Asia

---

 

Manager and (ii) a decrease of $2,368 in asset management revenue earned from separate accounts primarily due to lower performance fees being earned during 2015.

 

New Issue and Advisory Revenue

New issue and advisory revenue increased by $151, or 3%, to $5,370 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $5,219 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

New Issue and advisory revenue remained relatively flat.  New issue and advisory revenue earned by CCFL increased by $2,072, while new issue and advisory revenue earned by JVB declined by $1,921. 

During the first quarter of 2014, our U.S. broker-dealer, JVB, stopped providing investment banking and advisory services to special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”).  While certain of the former employees of JVB’s SPAC investment banking and advisory group went to work for another firm, we entered into an agreement (the “Tail Agreement”) whereby we allowed such former employees to continue work on certain in process engagements with their new firm.  As part of the Tail Agreement, we received a certain share of the revenue earned by the new firm related to these engagements.  During the year ended December 31, 2014, we earned total new issue revenue of $1,889 under the Tail Agreement from investment banking and advisory services related to SPACs. We did not earn any revenue under the Tail Agreement in 2015.  We do not expect further revenue to be earned under this agreement. 

Currently, JVB’s primary source of new issue revenue is our SBA group’s participation in COOF Securitizations, defined as SBA Confirmation of Originator Fee Certificates (“COOF”). The SBA secondary market program allows for the purchaser of a SBA loan certificate to “strip” a portion of the interest rate from a guaranteed loan portion, creating what is called an originator fee or interest only strip. This enhances the ability of SBA pool assemblers to securitize the guaranteed portion of loans that do not have the same interest rate. Our SBA group’s participation in this area has grown during recent years.

Our new issue and advisory revenue has been, and we expect will continue to be, volatile. We earn revenue from a limited number of engagements. Therefore, a small change in the number of engagements can result in large fluctuations in the revenue recognized. Further, even if the number of engagements remains consistent, the average revenue per engagement can fluctuate considerably. Finally, our revenue is generally earned when an underlying transaction closes (rather than on a monthly or quarterly basis). Therefore, the timing of underlying transactions increases the volatility of our revenue recognition.

Principal Transactions and Other Income

Principal transactions and other income decreased by $7,901 to $78 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $7,979 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  

 

---

 

Principal Transactions

EuroDekania is an investment company and we carry our investment at the NAV of the fund.  Income recognized in each period is a result of changes in the underlying NAV of the fund as well as distributions received.  Our investment in EuroDekania is denominated in Euros.  We sometimes hedge this exposure (as described in greater detail below).  Currently, EuroDekania is not making new investments, and has no plans to make new investments.  As cash has been received from its current investments, it has been returned to EuroDekania’s shareholders. 

 

Tiptree is publicly traded and we carry our investment at Tiptree’s closing share price.  Changes in the fair value of our investment in Tiptree represent changes in its share price, realized gains or losses on sales, and any dividends declared.  We sold a significant portion of our investment in Tiptree during 2015.  As of December 31, 2015, we owned 57,544 shares of Tiptree compared to 305,144 as of December 31, 2014.

In 2015, our currency hedge consisted of a Euro forward agreement designed to hedge the currency risk primarily associated with our investment in EuroDekania.  In 2014, the currency hedge consisted of a Yen hedge designed to hedge the currency risk associated with our investment in Star Asia.  The Yen hedge was extinguished in connection with the sale of the Star Asia Group (see below).

The loss on CLO investments of $1,512 recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015 is comprised of $1,687 of net unrealized loss, $222 of net realized loss on sale,  $1,975 of impairment charges, partially offset by $2,372 of investment income.  The loss of $123 recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014 is comprised of $1,622 of net unrealized loss, $100 of impairment charges, partially offset by $1,577 of investment income and $22 of realized gain on sale.

 

On February 20, 2014, we completed the sale of all of our ownership interests in the Star Asia Group.  In consideration for the sale of the Star Asia Group, we received an initial upfront payment of $20,043 and will receive contingent payments equal to 15% of certain revenues generated by Star Asia Manager, SAA Manager, SAP GP, Star Asia Capital Management, and certain affiliated entities  for a period of at least four years.  As a result of the sale of the Star Asia Group, we recorded a gain of $78 in the first quarter of 2014, which is included in the table above.  The gain was attributable to the Star Asia Group as a whole.  It was calculated as the cash received of $20,043 less the combined carrying value of all the entities in the Star Asia Group of $19,965 at the time of the sale.  The Company’s accounting policy is to record contingent payments receivable as income as they are earned. 

 

Other Income

Other income decreased by $3,975 to $1,517 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $5,492 for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

The revenue share arrangements noted above entitle us to either a percentage of revenue earned by certain entities or a percentage of revenue earned above certain thresholds.  See discussion of revenue share arrangements in “Item 1 — Business” beginning on page 5.      These arrangements expire, or have expired, as follows.

The note receivable represents an investment the Company made in the form of a note to an investment banking client in Europe in the mining industry.  The Company deemed this note to be uncollectable in 2015 and wrote-off the remaining balance due.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased by $7,645, or 14%, to $47,817 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $55,462 for the year ended December 31, 2014. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) a decrease of $1,736 in compensation and benefits; (ii) a decrease of $508 in business development, occupancy, and equipment; (iii) a decrease of $1,352 in subscriptions, clearing, and execution; (iv) a decrease of $558 of Professional fee and other operating;  (v) a decrease of $370 of depreciation and amortization; and (vi) a decrease of $3,121 in impairment of goodwill. 

---

 

Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and benefits decreased by $1,736, or 6%, to $28,028 for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to $29,764 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  

 

 

Cash compensation and benefits in the table above is primarily comprised of salary, incentive compensation, and benefits.  Cash compensation and benefits decreased by $1,606 to $26,839 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $28,445 for the year ended December 31, 2014. This decrease was primarily a result of a decrease in incentive compensation, which is tied to revenue and operating profitability.  Our total headcount decreased from 111 at December 31, 2014 to 87 at December 31, 2015.  From time to time, we pay employees severance when they are terminated without cause. These severance payments are included within cash compensation in the table above.

Equity-based compensation decreased by $130 to $1,189 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $1,319 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  The decrease was primarily as a result of certain share grants becoming fully vested on or about December 31, 2014, partially offset by the issuance of new grants during 2015.  See note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Business Development, Occupancy, and Equipment

Business development, occupancy, and equipment decreased by $508, or 13%, to $3,388 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $3,896 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  This was comprised of a decrease of $214 in occupancy and equipment and $294 in business development.  The decrease in occupancy and equipment was due to our continued efforts to reduce our office space costs by not renewing leases and subleasing excess office space.  The decrease in business development was primarily as a result of continued cost cutting efforts. 

Subscriptions, Clearing, and Execution

Subscriptions, clearing, and execution decreased by $1,352, or 16%, to $7,164 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $8,516 for the year ended December 31, 2014.   This was comprised of a decrease in subscriptions of $1,586, partially offset by an increase in clearing and execution of $234. The decrease in subscriptions was primarily the result of cancellation of subscriptions in connection with the merger of CCPR and JVB and reduced headcount.  The increase in clearing and execution was due to increased net trading revenue and increased fees paid on new issue transactions. 

Professional Fee and Other Operating Expenses

Professional fee and other operating expenses decreased by $558, or 6%, to $8,504 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $9,062 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  This was comprised of a decrease in professional fees of $431 and a decrease in other operating expense of $127.  The reductions were primarily due to reduced regulatory and other expenses as a result of the reduction in headcount related to the merger of CCPR and JVB and general cost cutting measures. 

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased by $370, or 34%, to $733 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $1,103 for the year ended December 31, 2014. This decrease was primarily due to certain fixed assets becoming fully depreciated.   

---

 

Impairment of Goodwill

We recorded an impairment charge of $3,121 in the year ended December 31, 2014.  No impairment charge was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2015.  See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Non-Operating Income and Expense

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense, net decreased by $479, or 11%, to $3,922 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $4,401 for the year ended December 31, 2014.  The decrease was primarily comprised of a decrease of $135 related to our 10.50% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 that were repurchased in May 2014 and a decrease of $354 related to reduced interest expense incurred on our junior subordinated notes due to changes in the effective rate used to determine discount amortization.  These notes have a variable rate and we adjust our amortization schedule annually, at the beginning of each year, based on the expected future LIBOR curve.  See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Income / (Loss) from Equity Method Affiliates

Income from equity method affiliates decreased by $27, or 100% to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2015,  as compared to   $27 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Income or loss from equity method affiliates represents our share of the related entities’ earnings.

 

As of December 31, 2015, we had no investments accounted for under the equity method.  See notes 5, 15, and 29 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Income Tax Expense / (Benefit)

The income tax expense / (benefit) was $85 for the year ended December 31, 2015,  as compared to ($414) for the year ended December 31, 2014.  The tax expense recognized in 2015 was primarily the result of foreign tax expense.  The tax benefit realized in 2014 was comprised of a deferred tax benefit of $641 primarily from changes in the expected reversal patterns of our deferred tax liability as well as changes in the expiration timeframes of our carry forward assets; partially offset by current foreign tax expense of $227. See discussion of Pennsylvania income tax assessment and other information in note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Net Income / (Loss) Attributable to the Non-controlling Interest

Net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was comprised of the non-controlling interest related to member interests in the Operating LLC other than interests held by us for the relevant periods. In addition, net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest also included non-controlling interest related to entities that were consolidated but not wholly owned by the Operating LLC.

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)Non-controlling interest is recorded on a monthly basis. Because earnings are recognized unevenly throughout the year and the non-controlling interest percentage may change during the period, the average effective non-controlling interest percentage may not equal the percentage at the end of any period or the simple average of the beginning and ending percentages.

 

---

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2013 

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.  

 

 

 

Revenues

Revenues decreased by $1,767, or 3%, to $55,750 for the year ended December 31, 2014,  as compared to $57,517 for the year ended December 31, 2013. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) a decrease of $10,472 in net trading revenue; (ii)  a decrease of $4,743 in asset management revenue; (iii) a decrease of $1,199 in new issue and advisory revenue; and (iv) an increase of  $14,647 in principal transactions and other income.

Net Trading

Net trading revenue decreased by $10,472, or 27%, to $28,056 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $38,528 for the year ended December 31, 2013.     The following table provides detail on net trading revenue by operation.

---

 

 

 

 

 

Effective January 31, 2014, we merged CCPR and JVB. The merged broker-dealer subsidiary operates under the JVB brand.   In the table above, for periods prior to the merger, the JVB revenue includes CCPR revenue.  In connection with this merger, we reduced our workforce by approximately 20% by eliminating certain redundant and non-core business lines. The decline in revenue was mainly a result of the merger and reduction in workforce.  JVB eliminated redundant trading personnel in overlapping asset classes.  The decrease in revenue in CCFL was primarily due to a decrease in overall trading volumes. 

Our net trading revenue includes unrealized gains on our trading investments, as of the applicable measurement date that may never be realized due to changes in market or other conditions not in our control.  This may adversely affect the ultimate value realized from these investments. In addition, our net trading revenue also includes realized gains on certain proprietary trading positions. Our ability to derive trading gains from such trading positions is subject to overall market conditions. Due to volatility and uncertainty in the capital markets, the net trading revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014 may not be indicative of future results. Furthermore, some of the assets included in the Investments-trading line of our consolidated balance sheets represent level 3 valuations within the FASB fair value hierarchy. Level 3 assets are carried at fair value based on estimates derived using internal valuation models and other estimates. See notes 8 and 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The fair value estimates made by us may not be indicative of the final sale price at which these assets may be sold.

 

Asset Management

 

Asset management fees decreased by $4,743, or 25%, to $14,496 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $19,239 for the year ended December 31, 2013, as discussed in more detail below. The following table provides a more detailed comparison of the two periods.

 

---

 

CDOs

Asset management revenue from Company-sponsored CDOs decreased by $2,665 to $10,999 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $13,664 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The following table summarizes the periods presented by asset class. 

 

Asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – U.S. declined primarily because, effective February 23, 2013, we no longer provided any services related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations.  We earned $1,157 of asset management revenue related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations in 2013 and $0 in 2014. On July 29, 2010, we entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party whereby we sold the management rights and responsibilities related to the Alesco X through XVII securitizations.  In connection with this agreement, we entered into a services agreement pursuant to which we provided certain services to the purchaser.  This services agreement expired on February 23, 2013.  We will continue to receive certain incentive payments through February 23, 2017, if the management fees earned by the third party exceed certain thresholds.  We will continue to recognize these incentive payments, if any, as earned.  Subsequent to the expiration of the services agreement in February 23, 2013, we began recognizing the incentive revenue as a component of principal transactions and other income.   In May 2014, one securitization that we managed had a successful auction and terminated.  We earned $271 and $714 in management fees from this terminated securitization during 2014 and 2013, respectively.  Also, in October 2014, another securitization had a successful auction and terminated.  We earned $633 and $671 in management fees from this terminated securitization during 2014 and 2013, respectively. We will no longer earn fees related to these terminated securitizations going forward. 

Asset management fees for high grade and mezzanine ABS declined primarily because the average AUM in the remaining deals in this asset class declined due to defaults of the underlying assets, repayments of the underlying assets, and the transfer of certain management contracts to a third party. As of December 31, 2014, we only managed one remaining contract.  We do not expect to earn material management fees in the future from this asset class. 

Asset management fees for TruPS and insurance company debt – Europe remained relatively unchanged.  Asset management fees for broadly syndicated loans – Europe consist of a single CLO and remained relatively unchanged.

A significant portion of our managed CDOs have stopped paying subordinated management fees due to diversion of cash flows called for within the CDO governing documents.  See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Revenue Recognition – Asset Management” beginning on page 68 for discussion of our accounting policy regarding recognition of revenue related to subordinated management fees. 

Other

Other asset management revenue decreased by $2,078 to $3,497 for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $5,575 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  Other asset management revenue decreased by $2,204 due to the sale of Star Asia Manager as part of the Star Asia Group in February 2014.  The remaining increase of $126 was due to increased separate account asset management revenues including incentive fees earned.   

New Issue and Advisory Revenue

New issue and advisory revenue decreased by $1,199, or 19%, to $5,219 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $6,418 for the year ended December 31, 2013.

During the first quarter of 2014, we stopped providing investment banking and advisory services to SPACs in our U.S. broker-dealer, JVB.  While certain of the former employees of JVB’s SPAC investment banking and advisory group went to work for another

---

 

firm, we entered into an agreement (the “Tail Agreement”) whereby we allowed such former employees to continue work on certain in process engagements with their new firm.  As part of the Tail Agreement, we received a certain share of the revenue earned by the new firm related to these engagements.  In addition to revenue earned via the Tail Agreement, we may continue to earn new issue and advisory revenue in JVB primarily related to new issues of structured products and as part of our European operations conducted by CCFL.  Of the $5,219 of new issue revenue recognized in the year ended December 31, 2014, $1,889 represented revenue earned under the Tail Agreement.  We do not expect revenue from the Tail Agreement to be significant going forward.

Our new issue and advisory revenue has been, and we expect will continue to be, volatile. We earn revenue from a limited number of engagements. Therefore, a small change in the number of engagements can result in large fluctuations in the revenue recognized. Further, even if the number of engagements remains consistent, the average revenue per engagement can fluctuate considerably. Finally, our revenue is generally earned when an underlying transaction closes (rather than on a monthly or quarterly basis). Therefore, the timing of underlying transactions increases the volatility of our revenue recognition.

Principal Transactions and Other Income

Principal transactions and other income increased by $14,647 to $7,979 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to ($6,668) for the year ended December 31, 2013.  

 

 

 

 

 

Principal Transactions

EuroDekania is an investment company and we carry our investment at the NAV of the fund.  Income recognized in each period is a result of changes in the underlying NAV of the fund. 

Star Asia is an investment company.  As of December 31, 2013, we carried our investment at the NAV of the fund.  Income recognized in 2013 was a result of changes in the underlying NAV of the fund.  However, because of the impending sale of Star Asia as part of the Star Asia Group on February 20, 2014, we calculated the fair value of Star Asia as of December 31, 2013 based on the sale proceeds.  Accordingly we did not record a change in fair value on Star Asia during the period it was owned in 2014. 

 

Effective June 30, 2013, we changed the way we calculate the fair value of our investment in Tiptree.  Previously, we carried our investment at the underlying NAV of the fund, Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P.  However, Tiptree completed a reorganization in the second half of 2013.  As a result of the reorganization, our investment in Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P. could be exchanged into shares of Tiptree Financial, Inc. based on a stated exchange ratio (which was generally fixed, but could be adjusted for certain events like stock dividends or stock splits).  Tiptree Financial Inc. is traded publicly on an exchange.  Therefore, beginning June 30, 2013, we calculated the fair value of our investment in Tiptree by using the closing price for Tiptree Financial Inc. and adjusting for the exchange ratio.  During the third quarter of 2014, we exchanged the units we held in Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P. into an equivalent number of shares of Tiptree Financial, Inc.  The loss recorded on our investment in Tiptree in 2013 was a result of a decline in the underlying NAV of the fund for the first six months and the change in the share price for the last six months.  The income recorded in 2014 was a result of an increase in the share price of Tiptree Financial, Inc.

---

 

Star Asia Special Situations Fund is an investment company.  As of December 31, 2013, we carried our investment at the NAV of the fund.  Income recognized in 2013 was a result of changes in the underlying NAV of the fund.  However, because of the impending sale of Star Asia Special Situations Fund as part of the Star Asia Group on February 20, 2014, we calculated the fair value of Star Asia Special Situations Fund as of December 31, 2013 based on the sale proceeds.  Accordingly we did not record a change in fair value on Star Asia during the period it was owned in 2014. 

Our currency hedges represent a Euro hedge and a Yen hedge.  The Euro hedge was put in place to hedge the change in value of our investment in EuroDekania, which made investments denominated in Euros.  The Yen hedge was put in place to hedge the change in value of our investment in Star Asia, which made investments denominated in Yen.  Subsequent to the sale of the Star Asia Group in February 2014, we no longer have a Yen hedge outstanding.  As December 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts with a notional amount of 3 million Euros. As December 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts with a notional amount of 1.25 billion Japanese Yen. 

Beginning in the first quarter of 2014, we began investing our capital in investments (primarily in CLOs) that we do not manage.  As of December 31, 2014, we held investments in ten separate CLOs with a total fair value of $21,518.  The loss of $123 recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014 is comprised of realized losses of $78, unrealized loss of $1,622, partially offset by income of $1,577. 

Income on other principal investments remained relatively unchanged from 2013 to 2014.

 

On February 20, 2014, we completed the sale of all of our ownership interests in the Star Asia Group.  In consideration for the sale of the Star Asia Group, we received an initial upfront payment of $20,043 and will receive contingent payments equal to 15% of certain revenues generated by Star Asia Manager, SAA Manager, SAP GP, Star Asia Capital Management, and certain affiliated entities for a period of at least four years.  As a result of the sale of the Star Asia Group, we recorded a gain of $78 in the first quarter of 2014, which is included in the table above.  The gain is attributable to the Star Asia Group as a whole.  It is calculated as the cash received of $20,043 less the combined carrying value of all the entities in the Star Asia Group of $19,965 at the time of the sale.  The Company’s accounting policy is to record contingent payments receivable as income as they are earned. 

Other Income

Other income increased by $1,583 to $5,492 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $3,909 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The major components of other income during 2014 were (i) $2,917 from contingent payments related to the sale of the Star Asia Group; (ii) $1,004 of revenue share payments related to Strategos generated from Cira SCMs sub-advisory agreement with Strategos which terminated during 2014; (iii) $752 of incentive payments earned related to the Alesco X – XVII securitizations (see CDO asset management fee revenue discussion above); (iv) $201 of revenue share earned related to FGC, generated pursuant to the purchase agreement connected with our sale of FGC, which revenue sharing arrangement was terminated during 2015; and (v) $617 of other income.  The major components of other income during 2013 were (i) $1,410 of revenue share payments related to Strategos; (ii) $1,084 of income recognized as a result of the extinguishment of a guarantee liability; (iii) 564 of incentive payments earned related to the Alesco X-XVII securitizations; (iv) $273 of revenue share earned related to FGC; and (v) $578 of other income. 

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased by $23,159, or 29%, to $55,462 for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $78,621 for the year ended December 31, 2013. As discussed in more detail below, the change was comprised of (i) a decrease of $17,403 in compensation and benefits; (ii) a decrease of $1,921 in business development, occupancy, and equipment; (iii) a decrease of $2,306 in subscriptions, clearing, and execution; (iv) a decrease of $4,348 of Professional fee and other operating; (v) a decrease of $302 of depreciation and amortization; and (vi) and increase in impairment of goodwill of $3,121. 

 Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and benefits decreased by $17,403, or 37%, to $29,764 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $47,167 for the year ended December 31, 2013. 

 

---

 

Cash compensation and benefits in the table above is primarily comprised of salary, incentive compensation, and benefits.  Cash compensation and benefits decreased by $16,775 to $28,445 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $45,220 for the year ended December 31, 2013. This decrease was primarily a result of a decrease in incentive compensation, which is tied to revenue and operating profitability.  Our total headcount decreased from 148 at December 31, 2013 to 111 at December 31, 2014. From time to time, we pay employees severance when they are terminated without cause. These severance payments are included within cash compensation in the table above.

Equity-based compensation decreased by $628 to $1,319 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $1,947 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  This was primarily a result of certain share grants becoming fully vested on or about December 31, 2013, partially offset by the issuance of new grants during 2014.  See note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Business Development, Occupancy, and Equipment

Business development, occupancy, and equipment decreased by $1,921, or 33%, to $3,896 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $5,817 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The decrease was comprised of a decrease of $762 in business development and a decrease in occupancy and equipment expenses of $1,159, primarily as a result of the reduction in headcount and offices in connection with the merger of CCPR and JVB.

    Subscriptions, Clearing, and Execution

Subscriptions, clearing, and execution decreased by $2,306, or 21%, to $8,516 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $10,822 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The decrease was due to a reduction in clearing and execution costs of $255, primarily as a result of lower trading volume, and a decrease in subscriptions of $2,051, primarily the result of cancellation of subscriptions in connection with the merger of CCPR and JVB and related reduction in headcount.

Professional Fee and Other Operating Expenses

Professional fee and other operating expenses decreased by $4,348, or 32%, to $9,062 for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $13,410 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  This is comprised of a decrease of $1,796 in professional fees and a decrease of $2,552 in other operating expenses.  The decrease in professional fees was primarily due to a decrease in consulting expense.  The decrease in other operating expense includes a decrease in bad debt expense of $1,340 related to an advisory fee receivable that was written off in the year ended December 31, 2013. In 2013, we wrote off a receivable of $900 that we deemed uncollectable.  Subsequent to that, the client agreed to a payment plan and we have been receiving periodic payments.  Because of the uncertainty of receiving these payments, we have been recognizing the payments as an offset to other operating expenses as received.  We received $90 of payments during the year ended December 31, 2013 resulting in a related net expense in 2013 of $810.  During the year ended December 31, 2014, we received $530 of payments.  The remaining reduction in other operating expenses was primarily due to reduced regulatory and other expenses as a result of the reduction in headcount related to the merger of CCPR and JVB. 

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased by $302, or 21%, to $1,103 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $1,405 for the year ended December 31, 2013. This decrease was primarily due to certain fixed assets becoming fully depreciated.  

Impairment of Goodwill

We recorded an impairment charge of $3,121 in the year ended December 31, 2014.  See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Non-Operating Income and Expense

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense increased by $208, or 5%, to $4,401 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $4,193 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The increase was comprised of (i) an increase of $493 on our junior subordinated notes due to changes in their variable rate and (ii) an increase of $568 related to the issuance of the 8.0% Convertible Notes, partially offset by (iii) a decrease of $659 relating to our New Notes due to the repurchase of New Notes, (iv) a decrease of $164 in other interest expense primarily related to interest related to a legal settlement accrual incurred in 2013, and (v) and other decreases of $30.  See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income (expense), net was $0 for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to ($15) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

---

 

Income / (Loss) from Equity Method Affiliates

Income from equity method affiliates decreased by $1,801, or 99% to $27 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $1,828 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Income or loss from equity method affiliates represents our share of the related entities’ earnings.

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2014, we had no investments accounted for under the equity method.  See notes 5, 15, and 29 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Income Tax Expense / (Benefit)

Income tax expense / (benefit) was ($414) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to income tax expense / (benefit) of ($3,565) for the year ended December 31, 2013.   The tax benefit realized in 2014 was comprised of (i) a deferred tax benefit of $641 primarily from changes in the expected reversal patterns of our deferred tax liability as well as changes in the expiration timeframes of our carry forward assets and (ii) current tax expense of $227 from taxes incurred in France and Spain. The tax benefit realized in 2013 was comprised of (i) a deferred tax benefit of $2,074 primarily from changes in the expected reversal patterns of our deferred tax liability as well as changes in the expiration timeframes of our carry forward assets; (ii) a tax benefit of $1,402 representing the recognition of a previously unrecognized tax benefit that became effectively settled during the period; and (iii) other miscellaneous net tax benefit of $89. See discussion of Pennsylvania income tax assessment and other information in note 21 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Net Income / (Loss) Attributable to the Non-controlling Interest

Net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was comprised of the non-controlling interest related to member interests in the Operating LLC other than interests held by us for the relevant periods. In addition, net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest also included non-controlling interest related to entities that were consolidated but not wholly owned by the Operating LLC.

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)Non-controlling interest is recorded on a monthly basis. Because earnings are recognized unevenly throughout the year and the non-controlling interest percentage may change during the period, the average effective non-controlling interest percentage may not equal the percentage at the end of any period or the simple average of the beginning and ending percentages.

 

---

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements including ongoing commitments to repay debt borrowings, make interest payments on outstanding borrowings, fund investments, and support other general business purposes. In addition, our United States and United Kingdom broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to certain regulatory requirements to maintain minimum levels of net capital. Historically, our primary sources of funds have been our operating activities and general corporate borrowings. In addition, our trading operations have generally been financed by use of collateralized securities financing arrangements as well as margin loans.

Certain subsidiaries of the Operating LLC have restrictions on the withdrawal of capital and otherwise in making distributions and loans.  Currently, JVB is subject to net capital restrictions imposed by the SEC and FINRA that require certain minimum levels of net capital to remain in these subsidiaries. In addition, these restrictions could potentially impose notice requirements or limit our ability to withdraw capital above the required minimum amounts (excess capital) whether through a distribution or a loan. CCFL is regulated by the FCA and must maintain certain minimum levels of capital. See note 23 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

See Liquidity and Capital Resources – Debt Financing and Liquidity and Capital Resources – Contractual Obligations below.

During the third quarter of 2010, our board of directors initiated a dividend of $0.05 per quarter, which was paid regularly through December 31, 2011. Beginning in 2012, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.02 per quarter, which was paid regularly through the fourth quarter of 2015. Our board of directors has the power to decide to increase, reduce, or eliminate dividends in the future and such decision will depend on a variety of factors, including business, financial, and regulatory considerations as well as any limitations under Maryland law or imposed by any agreements governing our indebtedness. There can be no assurances that such dividends will be maintained or increased and, if maintained or increased, will not subsequently be discontinued.

Each time a cash dividend was declared by our board of directors, a pro rata distribution was made to the other members of the Operating LLC upon the payment of dividends to our stockholders.

On March 8, 2016, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.02 per share, which will be paid on our Common Stock on April 6, 2016 to stockholders of record on March 23, 2016. A pro rata distribution will be made to the other members of the Operating LLC upon the payment of the dividends to our stockholders.

We filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 on February 14, 2014, which was declared effective by the SEC on May 14, 2014.   The registration statement enables us to offer and sell, in the aggregate, up to $300,000 of debt securities, preferred stock (either separately or represented by depositary shares), or Common Stock (including, if applicable, any associated preferred stock purchase rights, subscription rights, stock purchase units and warrants, as well as units that include any of these securities). Further, certain of the securities issuable under the registration statement may be convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Common Stock or preferred stock of IFMI, and we will be able to offer and sell any of the securities issuable under the registration statement separately or together, in any combination with other securities. The ability to offer and sell securities issuable under the registration statement will provide another source of liquidity in addition to the alternatives already in place. Further, any net proceeds from a sale of our securities under the registration statement could be used for our operations and for other general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, capital expenditures, repayment or refinancing of borrowings, working capital, investments, and acquisitions. The registration statement will expire on May 14, 2017.

 

---

 

Cash Flows

We have four primary uses for capital:

(1) To fund the operations of our Capital Markets business segment. Our Capital Markets business segment utilizes capital (i) to fund securities inventory to facilitate client trading activities; (ii) for risk trading on the firm’s own account; (iii) to fund our collateralized securities lending activities (iv) for temporary capital needs associated with underwriting activities; (v) to fund business expansion into existing or new product lines including additional capital dedicated to our TBA and other forward agency MBS and mortgage trading business line; and (vi) to fund any operating losses incurred.

(2) To fund investments. We make principal investments to generate attractive returns.  We may need to raise additional debt or equity financing in order to ensure we have the capital necessary to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities. 

(3) To fund mergers or acquisitions. We may opportunistically use capital to acquire other asset managers, individual asset management contracts, or financial services firms. To the extent our liquidity sources are insufficient to fund our future merger or acquisition activities, we may need to raise additional funding through an equity or debt offering. No assurances can be given that additional financing will be available in the future, or that if available, such financing will be on favorable terms.

 

(4) To fund potential dividends and distributions. During the third quarter of 2010 and for each subsequent quarter through December 31, 2015, we have declared a dividend. A pro rata distribution has been paid to the other members of the Operating LLC upon the payment of any dividends to stockholders of IFMI.

 

If we are unable to raise sufficient capital on economically favorable terms, we may need to reduce the amount of capital invested for the uses described above, which may adversely impact earnings and our ability to pay dividends.

 

As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained cash and cash equivalents of $14,115 and $12,253, respectively. We generated cash from or used cash for the activities described below. 

 

 

 See the statement of cash flows in our consolidated financial statements. We believe our available cash and cash equivalents, as well as our investment in our trading portfolio and related borrowing capacity will provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash needs of our ongoing operations in the near term.

2015 Cash Flows

As of December 31, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents were $14,115, representing an increase of $1,862 from December 31, 2014. The increase was attributable to the cash used by operating activities of $4,152, the cash provided by investing activities of $11,871, the cash used in financing activities of $5,620, and the decrease in cash caused by a change in exchange rates of $237.  

 

The cash used by operating activities of $4,152 was comprised of (a) net cash outflows of $1,241 related to working capital fluctuations; (b) net cash outflows of  $8,238 from trading activities comprised of our investments-trading, trading securities sold, not yet purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and receivables and payables from brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies, as well as the changes in unrealized gains and losses on the investments-trading and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased; and (c) net cash inflows from other earnings items of $5,327 (which represents net income or loss adjusted for the following non-cash operating items: other income / (expense), realized and unrealized gains and losses on other investments, income or loss from equity method affiliates, equity based compensation, depreciation, and amortization).

 

 

---

 

The cash provided by investing activities of $11,871 was comprised of (a) $12,031 in sales and returns of principal in other investments, at fair value; partially offset by (b) $11 of purchases of other investments, at fair value and $149 of purchase of furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements.

The cash used in financing activities of $5,620 was comprised of (a) $4,000 in repurchases of our Common Stock in connection with the Termination Agreement (see note 4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K), (b) $1,193 of dividends to stockholders of IFMI, and (c) $427 of distributions to non-controlling interests of the Operating LLC.

2014 Cash Flows

As of December 31, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents were $12,253, representing a decrease of $908 from December 31, 2013. The decrease was attributable to the cash provided by operating activities of $4,114, the cash provided by investing activities of $464, the cash used in financing activities of $5,289, and the decrease in cash caused by a change in exchange rates of $197.

 

The cash provided by operating activities of $4,114 was comprised of (a) net cash outflows of $5,454 related to working capital fluctuations; (b) net cash inflows of  $8,446 from trading activities comprised of our investments-trading, trading securities sold, not yet purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and receivables and payables from brokers, dealers and clearing agencies, as well as the changes in unrealized gains and losses on the investments-trading and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased; and (c) net cash inflows from other earnings items of $1,122 (which represents net income or loss adjusted for the following non-cash operating items: other income / (expense), realized and unrealized gains and losses on other investments, income or loss from equity method affiliates, equity based compensation, depreciation, and amortization).

 

 

The cash provided by investing activities of $464 was comprised of (a) $19,924 of cash proceeds from the sale of the Star Asia Group in February 2014; (b) $5,947 of proceeds from sales and returns of principal from other investments, at fair value; (c) $67 in distributions received from equity method affiliates (see note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K); net of (d) $25,290 of cash used to acquire other investments, at fair value; and (e) $184 used to purchase furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements. 

The cash used in financing activities of $5,289 was comprised of (a) $3,121 used to repay outstanding debt; (b) $87 used to net settle cash equity awards; (c) $384 to acquire Common Stock for treasury; (d) $419 of distributions to non-controlling interests related to the Operating LLC; and (e) $1,278 in dividends to stockholders of IFMI. 

2013 Cash Flows

As of December 31, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents were $13,161, representing a decrease of $1,339 from December 31, 2012. The decrease was attributable to the cash used by operating activities of $8,231, the cash provided by investing activities of $2,941, the cash provided by financing activities of $4,032, and the decrease in cash caused by a change in exchange rates of $81.

 

The cash used by operating activities of $8,231 was comprised of (a) net cash outflows of $10,078 related to working capital fluctuations; (b) net cash inflows of  $7,967 from trading activities comprised of our investments-trading, trading securities sold, not yet purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, and receivables and payables from brokers, dealers, and clearing agencies, as well as the changes in unrealized gains and losses on the investments-trading and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased; and (c)  net cash outflows from other earnings items of $6,120 (which represents net income or loss adjusted for the following non-cash operating items: other income / (expense), realized and unrealized gains and losses on other investments, income or loss from equity method affiliates, equity based compensation, depreciation, and amortization).

 

 

The cash provided by investing activities of $2,941 was comprised of (a) $679 of cash acquired due to the acquisition of Star Asia Manager; (b) $2,082 of proceeds from sales and returns of principal from other investments, at fair value; (c) $3,094 in distributions received from equity method affiliates (see note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K); net of (d) $2,035 of cash used to acquire other investments, at fair value, which was comprised of $302 of additional investment in the Star Asia Special Situations Fund, $762 invested in a Yen currency hedge, and $971 used to purchase shares of EuroDekania; (e) $30 of investment in equity method affiliates; and (f) $849 used to purchase furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements. 

The cash provided in financing activities of $4,032 was comprised of (a) $8,248 in proceeds for the issuance of convertible debt (see notes 4 and 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K); (b) $5,051 in net proceeds from the private placement of equity (see note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K); net of (c) $6,072 for the repurchase and repayment of debt, which includes $5,000 of repurchases of 10.5% Convertible Notes, $725 related to the Star Asia Manager note payable, and $347 related to our subordinated notes payable; (d) $670 in payment of deferred financing costs in connection with the new convertible debt issued; (e) $153 used for the payment of employee tax obligations related to restricted stock vesting; (f) $789 of net redemptions for the redeemable non-controlling interests related to

---

 

PrinceRidge; (g) $86 of repayments of mandatorily redeemable equity interests related to PrinceRidge; (h) $431 of distributions to non-controlling interests related to the Operating LLC; and (i) $1,066 in dividends to stockholders of IFMI. 

 

Regulatory Capital Requirements

As of December 31, 2015,  two of our subsidiaries were licensed securities dealers in the United States or the United Kingdom. As broker-dealers, our subsidiary, JVB, is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule in Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act, and our London-based subsidiary, CCFL, is subject to the regulatory supervision and requirements of the FCA. The amount of net assets that these subsidiaries may distribute is subject to restrictions under these applicable net capital rules. These subsidiaries have historically operated in excess of minimum net capital requirements. Our minimum capital requirements at December 31, 2015 were as follows. 

 

 

 

We operate with more than the minimum regulatory capital requirement in our licensed broker-dealers and at December 31, 2015, total net capital, or the equivalent as defined by the relevant statutory regulations, in our licensed broker-dealers totaled $30,347. See note 23 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, our licensed broker-dealers are generally subject to capital withdrawal notification and restrictions. As previously noted, we merged CCPR and JVB effective January 31, 2014. 

Securities Financing

We maintain repurchase agreements with various third party financial institutions. There is no maximum limit as to the amount of securities that may be transferred pursuant to these agreements, and transactions are approved on a case-by-case basis. The repurchase agreements do not include substantive provisions other than those covenants and other customary provisions contained in standard master repurchase agreements. The repurchase agreements generally require us to transfer additional securities to the counterparty in the event the value of the securities then held by the counterparty in the margin account falls below specified levels and contain events of default in cases where we breach our obligations under the agreement. We receive margin calls from our repurchase agreement counterparties from time to time in the ordinary course of business. To date, we have maintained sufficient liquidity to meet margin calls, and we have never been unable to satisfy a margin call, however, no assurance can be given that we will be able to satisfy requests from our counterparties to post additional collateral in the future. See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

If there were an event of default under a repurchase agreement, our counterparty would have the option to terminate all repurchase transactions existing with us and make any amount due from us to the counterparty payable immediately. Repurchase obligations are full recourse obligations to us. If we were to default under a repurchase obligation, the counterparty would have recourse to our other assets if the collateral was not sufficient to satisfy our obligations in full. Most of our repurchase agreements are entered into as part of our matched book repo business.

Our clearing brokers provide securities financing arrangements including margin arrangements and securities borrowing and lending arrangements. These arrangements generally require us to transfer additional securities or cash to the clearing broker in the event the value of the securities then held by the clearing broker in the margin account falls below specified levels and contain events of default in cases where we breach our obligations under such agreements.

An event of default under the clearing agreement would give our counterparty the option to terminate our clearing arrangement. Any amounts owed to the clearing broker would be immediately due and payable. These obligations are recourse to us. Furthermore, a termination of our clearing arrangements would result in a significant disruption to our business and would have a significant negative impact on our dealings and relationship with our customers.

---

 

The following table presents our period end balance, average monthly balance, and maximum balance at any month end for receivables under resale agreements and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

Fluctuations in the balance of our repurchase agreements from period to period and intraperiod are dependent on business activity in those periods. The fluctuations in the balances of our receivables under resale agreements over the periods presented were impacted by our clients’ desires to execute collateralized financing arrangements through the repurchase market or other financing products.

Average balances and period end balances will fluctuate based on market and liquidity conditions and we consider such intraperiod fluctuations as typical for the repurchase market. Month-end balances may be higher or lower than average period balances.

Debt Financing

As of December 31, 2015, we had the following sources of debt financing other than securities financing arrangements: (1) contingent convertible senior notes, comprised of the 8.0% Convertible Notes,  and (2) junior subordinated notes payable to the following two special purpose trusts: (a) Alesco Capital Trust I and (b) Sunset Financial Statutory Trust I.  

See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our outstanding debt.

The following table summarizes our long-term indebtedness and other financing outstanding. 

---

 

 

 

 

 

(3)Represents the interest rate as of the last day of the reporting period. 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than as described in note 10 (derivative financial instruments) and note 16 (variable interest entities) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, there were no material off balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2015. 

---

 

Contractual Obligations

The table below summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015 and the future periods in which such obligations are expected to be settled in cash. Our junior subordinated notes are assumed to be repaid on their respective maturity dates. Also, we have assumed that the 8.0% Convertible Notes are not converted prior to maturity.  Excluded from the table are obligations that are short-term in nature, including trading liabilities and repurchase agreements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)Assumes the 8.0% Convertible Notes are not converted prior to maturity. 

(2)The interest on the junior subordinated notes is variable. The interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2015 was used to compute the contractual interest payment in each period noted.

We believe that we will be able to continue to fund our current operations and meet our contractual obligations through a combination of existing cash resources and other sources of credit. Due to the uncertainties that exist in the economy, we cannot be certain that we will be able to replace existing financing or find sources of additional financing in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting policies are essential to understanding and interpreting the financial results in our consolidated financial statements. Our industry is subject to a number of highly complex accounting rules and requirements many of which place heavy burdens on management to make judgments relating to our business. We encourage readers of this Form 10-K to read all of our critical accounting policies, which are included in note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included herein for a full understanding of these issues and how the financial statements are impacted by these judgments. Certain of these policies are considered to be particularly important to the presentation of our financial results because they require us to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

 We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be the policies that are the most impactful to our financial statements and also subject to significant management judgment.

Valuation of Financial Instruments

How fair value determinations impact our financial statements

All of the securities we own that are classified as investments-trading, securities sold, not yet purchased, or other investments, at fair value are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value (both unrealized and realized) recorded in earnings.

Unrealized and realized gains and losses on securities classified as investments-trading in the consolidated balance sheets and are recorded as a component of net trading revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Unrealized and realized gains and losses on securities classified as other investments, at fair value, in the consolidated balance sheets are recorded as a component of principal transactions and other income in the consolidated statements of operations.

In addition, we may hold, from time to time, trading securities sold, not yet purchased in the consolidated balance sheets that represent our obligations to deliver the specified security at the contracted price, thereby creating a liability to purchase the security in

---

 

the market at prevailing prices. Unrealized and realized gains and losses on trading securities sold, not yet purchased are recorded as a component of net trading revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.

How we determine fair value for securities

We account for our investment securities at fair value under various accounting literature, including Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities (“FASB ASC 320”), pertaining to investments in debt and equity securities and the fair value option of financial instruments in FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments (“FASB ASC 825”). We also account for certain assets at fair value under the applicable industry guidance, namely FASB ASC 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies (“FASB ASC 946”).

The determination of fair value is based on quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent broker market quotations, market price quotations from third party pricing services, or, when independent broker quotations or market price quotations from third party pricing services are unavailable, valuation models prepared by our management. These models include estimates and the valuations derived from them could differ materially from amounts realizable in an open market exchange.

Fair Value Hierarchy — We adopted the fair value measurement provisions in FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“FASB ASC 820”), applicable to financial assets and financial liabilities effective January 1, 2008 (except for certain provisions related to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities for which we adopted effective January 1, 2009). FASB ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability between market participants at the measurement date (“exit price”). An exit price valuation will include margins for risk even if they are not observable. In accordance with FASB ASC 820, we categorize our financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are described below.

 

 

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Financial instruments carried at contract amounts and have short-term maturities (one year or less) are repriced frequently or bear market interest rates. Accordingly, those contracts are carried at amounts approximating fair value. Financial instruments carried at contract amounts on our consolidated balance sheets include receivables from and payables to brokers, securities purchased under agreements to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements” or “receivables under resale agreements”) and sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”).

How we determine fair value for investments in investment funds and similar vehicles

A portion of our other investments, at fair value represents investments in investment funds and other non-publicly traded entities that have the attributes of investment companies as described in FASB ASC 946-15-2. We estimate the fair value of these entities using the reported net asset value per share as of the reporting date in accordance with the “practical expedient” provisions related to investments in certain entities that calculated net asset value per share (or its equivalent) included in FASB ASC 820 for all entities except Star Asia. We generally classify these estimates within either level 2 of the valuation hierarchy if our investment in the entity is currently redeemable or level 3 if our investment is not currently redeemable.

In the case of Star Asia, prior to December 31, 2013, we utilized a valuation model to determine fair value, which used a market approach and the fair value was generally classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Star Asia accounts for itself as an investment company as described in ASC 946, Financial Services — Investment Companies. As an investment company, Star Asia carries its assets at fair value and reports NAV per share to its investors. However, Star Asia issued subordinated debt securities in

---

 

2009 at a significant discount to par. Upon issuance, Star Asia did not elect the fair value option for these liabilities and was not required to do so under ASC 946. Over time, it was our assessment that the fair value of the subordinated debt securities diverged from its carrying value. Because Star Asia’s published NAV was calculated using the amortized cost of these subordinated debt securities, we concluded it would be appropriate to adjust Star Asia’s reported NAV to recalculate it as if Star Asia’s subordinated debt was recorded at fair value as opposed to its historical amortized cost. We estimate the fair value of Star Asia’s subordinated debt securities by projecting the remaining debt cash outflows and discounting them at an estimated market rate as of the reporting date, which is derived from similar non-investment grade long term subordinated debt issuances.

As is described in more detail in note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company sold its investment in Star Asia in February 2014 along with its investment in Star Asia Special Situations Fund and other related entities.  Therefore, the Company determined the fair value of its investment in Star Asia by utilizing a valuation model that took into account the terms and conditions of the sale in February 2014, as opposed to the valuation model described in the immediately preceding two paragraphs (which was used historically by the Company).

Derivative Financial Instruments

We do not utilize hedge accounting for our derivatives. Accordingly, all derivatives are carried at fair value with unrealized and realized gains recognized in earnings.

If the derivative is expected to be managed by employees of our Capital Markets business segment, or is a hedge for an investment classified as investments-trading, the derivative will be carried as a component of investments-trading if an asset or securities sold, not yet purchased if a liability. If the derivative is a hedge for an investment carried as a component of other investments, at fair value, the derivative will be recorded in other investments, at fair value.

We may, from time to time, enter into derivatives to manage our risk exposures (i) arising from fluctuations in foreign currency rates with respect to the our investments in foreign currency denominated investments; (ii) arising from our investments in interest sensitive investments; and (iii) arising from our facilitation of mortgage-backed trading. Derivatives entered into by us, from time to time, may include (i) foreign currency forward contracts; (ii) purchase and sale agreements of TBAs and other forward agency MBS contracts; and (iii) other extended settlement trades.

 TBAs are forward contracts to purchase or sell mortgage-backed securities whose collateral remain “to be announced” until just prior to the trade settlement. In addition to TBAs, we sometimes enter into forward purchases or sales of agency mortgage-backed securities where the underlying collateral has been identified.  These transactions are referred to as other forward agency MBS contracts.   TBAs and other forward agency MBS contracts are accounted for as derivatives by us. 

In addition to TBAs and other forward agency MBS contracts as part of our broker-dealer operations, we may from time to time enter into other securities or loan trades that do not settle within the normal securities settlement period. In those cases, the purchase or sale of the security or loan is not recorded until the settlement date.   However, from the trade date until the settlement date, our interest in the security is accounted for as a derivative as either a forward purchase commitment or forward sale commitment.

Derivatives involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet risk, whereby changes in the level or volatility of interest rates or market values of the underlying financial instruments may result in changes in the value of a particular financial instrument in excess of its carrying amount. Depending on our investment strategy, realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in principal transactions and other income or in net trading in our consolidated statements of operations on a trade date basis.  

Accounting for Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

---

 

We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such a determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial operations. In the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

Our policy is to record penalties and interest as a component of provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of operations.

 

Our majority owned subsidiary, the Operating LLC, is treated as a pass through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes and in most of the states in which we do business. The Operating LLC is subject to entity level taxes in certain state and foreign jurisdictions. However, as a result of the Merger, we acquired significant deferred tax assets and liabilities and now have significant tax attributes. Effective as of January 1, 2010, we began to be treated as a C corporation for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes.

As shown in note 21 to the consolidated financial statements contained herein, we currently have significant unrecognized deferred tax assets. These assets are unrecognized because we have recorded valuation allowances as we have determined that it is not more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of these tax assets. However, this determination is ongoing and subject to change. If we were to change this determination in the future, a significant tax benefit would be recognized as a component of earnings.

Revenue Recognition

Net trading: Net trading includes: (i) all gains, losses, and income (interest and dividends) from securities classified as investments-trading and trading securities sold, not yet purchased; (ii) interest income and expense from collateralized securities transactions; and (iii) commissions and riskless trading profits. Riskless principal trades are transacted through our proprietary account with a customer order in hand, resulting in little or no market risk to us. Transactions are recognized on a trade date basis. The investments classified as trading are carried at fair value. The determination of fair value is based on quoted market prices of an active exchange, independent broker market quotations, market price quotations from third party pricing services, or, when independent broker quotations or market price quotations from third party pricing services are unavailable, valuation models prepared by our management. The models include estimates and the valuations derived from them could differ materially from amounts realizable in an open market exchange. Net trading is reduced by interest expense, which is directly incurred to purchase income generating assets related to trading activities. Such interest expense is recorded on an accrual basis.

Asset management: Asset management revenue consists of CDO asset management fees, fees earned for management of our permanent capital vehicles and investment funds, fees earned under a service arrangement with another CDO asset manager, and other asset management fees. CDO asset management fees are earned for providing ongoing asset management services to the applicable trust. In general, we earn a senior asset management fee, a subordinated asset management fee, and an incentive asset management fee.

The senior asset management fee is generally senior to all the securities in the CDO capital structure and is recognized on a monthly basis as services are performed. The senior asset management fee is generally paid on a quarterly basis.

The subordinated asset management fee is an additional payment for the same services, but has a lower priority in the CDO cash flows. If the trust experiences a certain level of asset defaults, these fees may not be paid. There is no recovery by the trust of previously paid subordinated asset management fees. It is our policy to recognize these fees on a monthly basis as services are performed. The subordinated asset management fee is generally paid on a quarterly basis. However, if we determine that the subordinated asset management fee will not be paid (which generally occurs on the quarterly payment date), we will stop recognizing additional subordinated asset management fees on that particular trust and will reverse any subordinated asset management fees that are accrued and unpaid. We will begin accruing the subordinated asset management fee again if payment resumes and, in management’s estimate, continued payment is reasonably assured. If payments were to resume but we were unsure of continued payment, we would recognize the subordinated asset management fee as payments were received and would not accrue on a monthly basis.

The incentive management fee is an additional payment, made typically after five to seven years of the life of a CDO, which is based on the clearance of an accumulated cash return on investment (“Hurdle Return”), received by the most junior CDO securities holders. It is an incentive for us to perform in our role as asset manager by minimizing defaults and maximizing recoveries. The incentive management fee is not ultimately determined or payable until the achievement of the Hurdle Return by the most junior CDO securities holders. We do not recognize incentive fee revenue until the Hurdle Return is achieved and the amount of the incentive management fee is determinable and payment is reasonably assured.

Other asset management fees represent fees earned for the base and incentive management of other investment vehicles that we manage.

---

 

New issue and advisory: New issue and advisory revenue includes: (i) new issue revenue associated with originating, arranging, or placing newly created financial instruments; and (ii) revenue from advisory services. New issue and advisory revenue is recognized when all services have been provided and payment is earned.

Principal transactions and other income: Principal transactions include all gains, losses, and income (interest and dividend) from securities or loans classified as other investments, at fair value, in the consolidated balance sheets.

The investments classified as other investments, at fair value, are carried at fair value. The determination of fair value is described in the valuation of financial instruments section above. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Other income / (loss) includes foreign currency gains and losses, interest earned on cash and cash equivalents, and other miscellaneous income.

Variable Interest Entities  

FASB ASC 810, Consolidation (“FASB ASC 810”) contains the guidance surrounding the definition of variable interest entities (“VIEs”), the definition of variable interests, and the consolidation rules surrounding VIEs. In general, VIEs are entities in which equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. We have variable interests in VIEs through our management contracts and investments in various securitization entities including CLOs and CDOs.

Once it is determined that we hold a variable interest in a VIE, FASB ASC 810 requires that we perform a qualitative analysis to determine (i) which entity has the power to direct the matters that most significantly impact the VIEs financial performance and (ii) if we have the obligation to absorb the losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive the benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The entity that has both of these characteristics is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and required to consolidate the VIE. This assessment must be done on an ongoing basis.

We classify the VIEs we are involved with into two groups: (i) VIEs managed by us and (ii) VIEs managed by third parties. In the case of the VIEs that we have been involved with, we have generally concluded that the entity that manages the VIE has the power to direct the matters that most significantly impact the VIEs financial performance. This is not a blanket conclusion as it is possible for an entity other than a manager to have the power to direct such matters. However, for all the VIEs we were involved with as of December 31, 2015, we have drawn this conclusion.

 

In the case where we have an interest in a VIE managed by a third party, we have concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary because we do not have the power to direct the VIEs’ activities. In the case of an interest in a VIE managed by us, we will perform an additional qualitative analysis to determine if our interest (including any investment as well as any management fees that qualify as variable interests) could absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This analysis considers the most optimistic and pessimistic scenarios of potential economic results that could reasonably be experienced by the VIE. Then, we compare the benefit it would receive (in the optimistic scenario) or the losses it would absorb (in the pessimistic scenario) as compared to all benefits and losses absorbed by the VIE in total. If the benefits or losses absorbed by us were significant as compared to total benefits and losses absorbed by all the variable interest holders, then we would conclude that we are the primary beneficiary.

We have variable interests in various securitizations but we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore are not consolidating the securitization VIEs. The maximum potential financial statement loss we would incur if the securitization vehicles were to default on all of their obligations would be (a) the loss of value of the interests in securitizations that we hold in our inventory at the time (see note 16 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and (b) any management fee receivables in the case of managed VIEs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following is a list of recent accounting pronouncements that, we believe, will have a continuing impact on our financial statements going forward. For a more complete list of recent pronouncements, see note 3-U to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which replaces existing revenue recognition guidance in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, replaces certain other industry-specific revenue recognition guidance, specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer, and provides recognition and measurement guidance in relation to sales of non-financial assets. The core principle of this ASU is to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The ASU provides guidance on how to achieve this core principle, including how to identify contracts with customers and separate performance obligations in the contract, how to determine and allocate the transaction price to such performance obligations and how to recognize revenue when a performance obligation has been satisfied.  The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption

---

 

prohibited.  We will be required to apply the amendments in this ASU using one of the following two methods: (i) retrospective to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within the ASU or (ii) retrospective with the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU recognized at the date of the initial application and providing certain additional disclosures as defined in the ASU.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.   Earlier application is permitted only as of the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting. We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2018 and are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments when the Terms of an Award Provide that a Performance Target could be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which requires a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be accounted for as a performance condition rather than as a non-vesting condition that affects the grant-date fair value of the award.  A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, as it relates to such awards. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 with early adoption permitted using either of two methods: (i) prospective to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (ii) retrospective to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter, with the cumulative effective applying this ASU as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements.  We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2016 and are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-13, Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity, which provides a measurement alternative for an entity that consolidates collateralized financing entities.  A collateralized financing entity is a variable interest entity with nominal or no equity that holds financial assets and issues beneficial interests in those financial assets.  The beneficial interests, which are financial liabilities of the collateralized financing entity, have contractual recourse only to the related assets of the collateralized financing entity. If elected, the alternative method results in the reporting entity measuring both the financial assets and financial liabilities of the collateralized financing entity using the more observable of the two fair value measurements, which effectively removes measurement differences between the financial assets and financial liabilities of the collateralized financing entity previously recorded as net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling and other beneficial interests and as an adjustment to appropriated retained earnings. The reporting entity continues to measure its own beneficial interests in the collateralized financing entity (other than those that represent compensation for services) at fair value.  The ASU is effective for annual periods and interim periods with those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  A reporting entity may apply the ASU using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption.  A reporting entity may also apply the ASU retrospectively to all relevant prior periods beginning with the annual period in which ASU No. 2009-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, was adopted. Early adoption is permitted.  We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2016 and are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20), Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items, which eliminates from U.S. GAAP the requirement of extraordinary items to be separately classified on the income statement.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015.  A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively.  A reporting entity may apply the amendments retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2016 and are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) – Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which makes targeted amendments to the current consolidation guidance and ends the deferral granted to investment companies from applying the VIE guidance.  The revised consolidation guidance, among other things, (i) modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, and (iii) modifies the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs through fee arrangements and related party  relationships.  We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2016 and are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts.  The recognition and measurement for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early

---

 

adoption of these amendments is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. An entity should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, and the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance.  We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2016 and are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to our consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent).  Reporting entities are permitted to use net asset value (“NAV”) as a practical expedient to measure the fair value of certain investments.  Under current U.S. GAAP, investments that use the NAV practical expedient to measure fair value are categorized within the fair value hierarchy as level 2 or level 3 investments depending on their redemption attributes, which has led to diversity in practice.  This ASU will remove the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments that use the NAV practical expedient for fair value measurement purposes.  Furthermore, the ASU will remove the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the NAV practical expedient.  Rather, those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods with those fiscal years.  The ASU must be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented.  We will adopt this ASU on January 1, 2016.  The adoption of this ASU is expected to have an impact on the disclosures to our financial statements.

 

In June 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-10, Technical Corrections and Improvements, which covers a wide range of topics in the codification.  This ASU clarifies the codification, corrects unintended application of guidance, or makes minor improvements to the codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities.  The transition guidance varies based on the amendments in this ASU.  The amendments in this ASU that require transition guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  All other amendments are effective upon the issuance of this ASU.  We do not expect that the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

 

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which includes amendments that eliminate the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments following a business combination.  The new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified.  The prior period impact of the adjustment should be either presented separately on the face of the income statement or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We will adopt the provisions of this ASU effective January 1, 2016 and are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to our consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10).  The revised guidance makes the following changes: (i) requires equity investments with readily determinable fair value (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (ii) allows an entity to choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer; (iii) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment, and when a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value; (iv) eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (v) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (vi) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (vii) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (viii) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and; (ix) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For non-public entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted.  We are currently evaluating the impact of these amendments on the presentation in its consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

 

ITEM  7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

All amounts in this section are in thousands unless otherwise noted.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of economic loss arising from the adverse impact of market changes to the market value of our trading and investment positions. Market risk is inherent to both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments, and accordingly, the scope of our market risk management procedures extends beyond derivatives to include all market risk sensitive financial instruments. For purposes of analyzing the components of market risk, we have broken out our investment portfolio into three broad categories, plus debt as described below. 

 

Fixed Income Securities: We hold, from time to time, the following securities: U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agency MBS, U.S. government agency debt securities, CMOs, non-government MBS, corporate bonds, non-redeemable and redeemable preferred stock, municipal bonds, certificates of deposits, SBA loans, residential loans, whole loans, and unconsolidated investments in the middle and senior tiers of securitization entities and TruPS. We attempt to mitigate our exposure to market risk by entering into economic hedging transactions, which may include TBAs. The fixed income category can be broadly broken down into two subcategories: fixed rate and floating rate.

Floating rate securities are not in themselves particularly sensitive to interest rate risk. Because they generally accrue income at a variable rate, the movement in interest rates typically does not impact their fair value. Fluctuations in their current income due to variations in interest rates are generally not material to us. Floating rate fixed income securities are subject to other market risks such as: default risk of the underlying issuer, changes in issuer’s credit spreads, prepayment rates, investor demand, and supply of securities within a particular asset class or industry class of the ultimate obligor. The sensitivity to any individual market risk can be difficult to quantify.

The fair value of fixed rate securities is sensitive to changes in interest rates. However, fixed rate securities that have low credit ratings or represent junior interests in securitizations are not particularly interest rate sensitive. In general, when we acquire interest rate sensitive securities, we enter into an offsetting short position for a similar fixed rate security. Alternatively, we may enter into other interest rate hedging arrangements such as interest rate swaps or Eurodollar futures. We measure our net interest rate sensitivity by determining how the fair value of our net interest rate sensitive assets would change as a result of a 100 basis points (“bps”) adverse shift across the entire yield curve. Based on this analysis, as of December 31, 2015, we would have incurred a loss of $4,922 if the yield curve rises 100 bps across all maturities and a gain of $4,931 if the yield curve fell 100 bps across all maturities. As of December 31, 2014, we would have incurred a loss of $3,424 if the yield curve rose 100 bps across all maturities and a gain of $3,415 if the yield curve fell 100 bps across all maturities.

Equity Securities: We hold equity interests in both public and private entities. These investments are subject to equity price risk. Equity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of underlying equity prices, which affect the value of equity securities or instruments that in turn derive their value from a particular stock. We attempt to reduce the risk of loss inherent in our inventory of equity securities by closely monitoring those security positions. We have had equity investments in entities where the investment is denominated in a foreign currency, or where the investment is denominated in U.S. Dollars but the investee primarily makes investments in foreign currencies.  The fair values of these investments are subject to change as the spot foreign exchange rate between these currencies and the U.S. Dollar (our functional currency) fluctuates. We may, from time to time, enter into foreign exchange rate derivatives to hedge all or a portion of this risk. We measure our net equity price sensitivity and foreign currency sensitivity by determining how the net fair value of our equity price sensitive and foreign exchange sensitive assets would change as a result of a 10% adverse change in equity prices or foreign exchange rates.  Based on this analysis, as of December 31, 2015, our equity price sensitivity was $290 and our foreign exchange currency sensitivity was $14.  As of December 31, 2014, our equity price sensitivity was $622 and our foreign exchange currency sensitivity was $6.

Other Securities: These investments are primarily made up of residual interests in securitization entities. The fair value of these investments will fluctuate over time based on a number of factors including, but not limited to: liquidity of the investment type, the credit performance of the individual assets and issuers within the securitization entity, the asset class of the securitization entity and the relative supply of and demand for investments within that asset class, credit spreads in general, the transparency of valuation of the assets and liabilities of the securitization entity, and investors’ view of the accuracy of ratings prepared by the independent rating agencies. The sensitivity to any individual market risk cannot be quantified.

Debt: In addition to the risks noted above, we incur interest rate risk related to our debt obligations. We have debt that accrues interest at either variable rates or fixed rates. As of December 31, 2015, a 100 bps change in the three month LIBOR would have resulted in a change in our annual cash to be paid for interest in the amount of $481. A 100 bps adverse change in the market yield to maturity would have resulted in an increase in the fair value of the debt in the amount of $2,733 as of December 31, 2015.  

---

 

Counterparty Risk and Settlement Risk

We are subject to counterparty risk primarily in two areas: our collateralized securities transactions described in note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our TBA and other forward agency MBS activities described in note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. With respect to the matched book repo financing activities, our risk is that the counterparty does not fulfill its obligation to repurchase the underlying security when it is due. In this case, we would typically liquidate the underlying security, which may result in a loss if the security has declined in value in relation to the balance due from the counterparty under the reverse repurchase agreement.

 

With respect to our TBA and other forward agency MBS activities, our risk is that the counterparty does not settle the TBA trade on the scheduled settlement date. In this case, we would have to execute the trade, which may result in a loss based on market movement in the value of the underlying trade between its initial trade date and its settlement date (which in the case of TBAs can be as long as 90 days). If we were to incur a loss under either of these activities, we have recourse to the counterparty pursuant to the underlying agreements.

Finally, we have general settlement risk in all of our regular way fixed income and equity trading activities. If a counterparty fails to settle a trade, we may incur a loss in closing out the position and would be forced to try to recover this loss from the counterparty. If the counterparty has become insolvent or does not have sufficient liquid assets to reimburse us for the loss, we may not get reimbursed.

How we manage these risks

Market Risk

We seek to manage our market risk by utilizing our underwriting and credit analysis processes that are performed in advance of acquiring any investment. In addition, we continually monitor our investments-trading and our trading securities sold, not yet purchased on a daily basis and our other investments on a monthly basis. We perform an in-depth monthly analysis on all our investments and our risk committee meets on a monthly basis to review specific issues within our portfolio and to make recommendations for dealing with these issues. In addition, our broker-dealer has an assigned chief risk officer that reviews the firm’s positions and trading activities on a daily basis.

Counterparty Risk

We seek to manage our counterparty risk primarily through two processes. First, we perform a credit assessment of each counterparty to ensure the counterparty has sufficient equity, liquidity, and profitability to support the level of trading or lending we plan to do with them. Second, we may require counterparties to post cash or other liquid collateral (“margin”) to support changes in the market value of the underlying securities or trades on an ongoing basis.

In the case of collateralized securities financing transactions, we will generally lend less than the market value of the underlying security initially. The difference between the amount lent and the value of the security is referred to as the haircut. We will seek to maintain this haircut while the loan is outstanding. If the value of the security declines, we will require the counterparty to post margin to offset this decline. If the counterparty fails to post margin, we will sell the underlying security. The haircut serves as a buffer against market movements to prevent or minimize a loss.

 

In the case of TBA and other forward agency MBS activities, we sometimes require counterparties to post margin with us in the case of the market value of the underlying TBA trade declining. If the counterparty fails to post margin, we will close out the underlying trade. In the case of TBA and other forward agency MBS activities, we will sometimes obtain initial margin or a cash deposit from the counterparty which serves a purpose similar to the haircut as an additional buffer against losses. However, some of our TBA and other forward agency MBS activities are done without initial margin or cash deposits.

---

 

 

ITEM  8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The financial statements of the Company, the related notes and schedules to the financial statements, together with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, are set forth beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM  9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have established and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company (and its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, who certify our financial reports, and to other members of senior management and the board of directors. Under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2015. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at December 31, 2015.  

 

   Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as described in the revised (2013) version in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believed that, as of December 31, 2015, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s auditors pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM  9B.OTHER INFORMATION.

None. 

 

---

 

PART III

Item  10.Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.

Our board of directors has adopted the Code of Conduct applicable to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company. The Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.ifmi.com/investorrelations/gov_conduct.asp and the Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of the SEC’s Current Report on Form 8-K regarding amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Conduct by posting such information on its website. 

The information required by Item 10 is included in the sections entitled “Executive Officers,” “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors Information” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item  11.Executive Compensation.

The information required by Item 11 is included in the sections entitled “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation of Directors” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item  12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by Item 12 with respect to the “Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” is included in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan was approved by our stockholders at the special meeting held on October 6, 2006. The 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan was amended on April 26, 2007 and June 18, 2008.

Following the Merger in December 2009, our board of directors assumed the Cohen Brothers, LLC 2009 Equity Award Plan (the “2009 Equity Award Plan”) from Cohen Brothers on December 16, 2009. The 2009 Equity Award Plan expired upon the vesting of restricted units of the Operating LLC on December 16, 2012. In December 2012, the Company’s vice chairman (formerly our chairman and chief executive officer of the Company), Daniel G. Cohen, transferred to the Company 116,595 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company in order to satisfy his obligation to fund the equity vesting under the 2009 Equity Award Plan pursuant to the Equity Plan Funding Agreement.

The Company’s 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan was approved by our stockholders at the annual meeting held on December 10, 2010. The 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan was amended on April 18, 2011 and amended and restated on March 8, 2012 and November 30, 2013.

 

The following table provides information regarding the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2015.  

 

 

 

The remainder of the information required by Item 12 is included in the Section entitled “Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

---

 

Item  13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by Item 13 is included in the sections entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors Information — Director Independence” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item  14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by Item 14 is included in the sections entitled “Principal Accounting Firm Fees” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

---

 

PART IV

ITEM  15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a) Documents filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) The following financial statements of the Company are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

 

 

---

 

(b) Exhibit List

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

*Filed herewith.

**Data required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification 260, “Earnings per Share,” is provided in note 24 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

***Furnished herewith.

+Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

#Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally copies of any of the omitted schedules or exhibits upon request by the SEC.

†Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this document. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with SEC.  

(c) The financial statement schedules listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules listed under Item 15.1(a) are included under Item 8 and are presented beginning on page F-1 of this Form 10-K. All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, or is not present in amount sufficient to require submission of the schedule, and therefore have been omitted.

 

---

 

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DATE: March 9, 2016

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

 

---

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK