e10vk
 
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
    EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    Washington, D.C.
    20549
 
 
 
 
    Form 10-K
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
    OF 1934
 
    |  |  |  | 
| For the fiscal year
    ended: |  | Commission file
    number: | 
| December 31,
    2006 |  | 000-50890 | 
 
 
 
 
    COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP,
    INC.
    (Exact name of Registrant as
    specified in its charter)
 
    |  |  |  | 
| Delaware |  | 41-1990662 | 
| (State of
    Incorporation) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification
    No.) | 
|  |  |  | 
| 6530 West Campus
    Oval |  | 43054 | 
| New Albany, Ohio |  | (Zip Code) | 
| (Address of Principal Executive
    Offices) |  |  | 
 
    Registrants telephone number, including area code:
    (614) 289-5360
 
 
 
 
    Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
    Act:
 
    |  |  |  | 
| 
    Title of Each Class
 |  | 
    Name of Exchange on Which Registered
 | 
|  | 
| Common Stock, par value
    $.01 per share |  | The Nasdaq Global Select Market | 
 
    Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
    Act:
    None
 
 
 
 
    Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
    seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
    Act.  Yes o     No þ
    
 
    Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
    reports pursuant to Section 13 or Schedule 15(d) of
    the
    Act.  Yes o     No þ
    
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
    all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
    12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
    was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
    subject to such filing requirements for the past
    90 days.  Yes þ     No
    o
    
 
    Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
    pursuant to Item 405 of
    Regulation S-K
    is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
    of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
    information statements incorporated by reference in
    Part III of this
    Form 10-K
    or any amendment to this
    Form 10-K.  þ
    
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
    accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
    filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
    accelerated filer in
    Rule 12b-2
    of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
    Large accelerated
    filer o     Accelerated
    filer þ     Non-accelerated
    filer o
    
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
    (as defined in
    Rule 12b-2
    of the Exchange
    Act).  Yes o     No þ
    
 
    The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
    equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
    at which the common equity was last sold on June 30, 2006,
    excluding shares owned beneficially by affiliates, was
    $448,916,663.
 
    As of February 28, 2007, 21,707,769 shares of Common
    Stock of the Registrant were outstanding.
 
    DOCUMENTS
    INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
    Information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of
    Part III of this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    are incorporated by reference from the Registrants Proxy
    Statement for its annual meeting to be held May 22, 2007
    (the 2007 Proxy Statement).
 
 
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
 
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
 
    Table of Contents
 
    
    i
 
    CERTAIN
    DEFINITIONS
 
    All references in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    to the Company, Commercial Vehicle
    Group, CVG, we, us,
    and our refer to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and
    its consolidated subsidiaries (unless the context otherwise
    requires).
 
    FORWARD-LOOKING
    INFORMATION
 
    This Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
    Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that
    are not statements of historical fact, including without
    limitation, certain statements under
    Item 1  Business and
    Item 7  Managements Discussion and
    Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    and located elsewhere herein regarding industry prospects and
    our results of operations or financial position, may be deemed
    to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the
    foregoing, the words believes,
    anticipates, plans, expects,
    and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
    statements. The important factors discussed in
    Item 1A  Risk Factors, among others,
    could cause actual results to differ materially from those
    indicated by forward-looking statements made herein and
    presented elsewhere by management from time to time. Such
    forward-looking statements represent managements current
    expectations and are inherently uncertain. Investors are warned
    that actual results may differ from managements
    expectations. Additionally, various economic and competitive
    factors could cause actual results to differ materially from
    those discussed in such forward-looking statements, including,
    but not limited to, factors which are outside our control, such
    as risks relating to (i) our ability to develop or
    successfully introduce new products; (ii) risks associated
    with conducting business in foreign countries and currencies;
    (iii) general economic or business conditions affecting the
    markets in which we serve; (iv) increased competition in
    the heavy-duty truck market; and (v) our failure to
    complete or successfully integrate additional strategic
    acquisitions. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking
    statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf
    are expressly qualified in their entirety by such cautionary
    statements.
    
    ii
 
 
    PART I
 
 
    Overview
 
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its
    subsidiaries, is a leading supplier of fully integrated system
    solutions for the global commercial vehicle market, including
    the heavy-duty truck market, the construction and agriculture
    markets and the specialty and military transportation markets.
    As a result of our strong leadership in cab-related products and
    systems, we are positioned to benefit from the increased focus
    of our customers on cab design and comfort and convenience
    features to better serve their end-user, the driver. Our
    products include suspension seat systems, interior trim systems
    (including instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry
    and floor systems), cab structures and components, mirrors,
    wiper systems, electronic wire harness assemblies and controls
    and switches specifically designed for applications in
    commercial vehicles.
 
    We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
    by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
    a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
    believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
    our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
    American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
    systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
    interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
    other structural components. We believe our products are used by
    virtually every major North American commercial vehicle OEM,
    which we believe creates an opportunity to cross-sell our
    products and offer a fully integrated system solution.
 
    Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
    new commercial vehicles manufactured, which in turn is a
    function of general economic conditions, interest rates, changes
    in governmental regulations, consumer spending, fuel costs and
    our customers inventory levels and production rates. New
    commercial vehicle demand has historically been cyclical and is
    particularly sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy,
    which generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage
    hauled by commercial vehicles. Production of commercial vehicles
    in North America peaked in 1999 and experienced a downturn from
    2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak economy, an oversupply of
    new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on commercial
    vehicles and equipment. Demand for commercial vehicles improved
    in 2006 due to broad economic recovery in North America,
    corresponding growth in the movement of goods, the growing need
    to replace aging truck fleets and OEMs received larger than
    expected pre-orders in anticipation of the new EPA emissions
    standards becoming effective in 2007.
 
    The Company was formed on August 22, 2000. On
    October 6, 2000, the Company acquired the assets of Bostrom
    plc in exchange for $83.6 million in cash and assumption of
    certain liabilities. The source of the cash consisted of
    $49.8 million of debt and $33.8 million of equity.
 
    On March 28, 2003, the Company and Commercial Vehicle
    Systems Holdings, Inc. (CVS) entered into an
    Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the Company
    was merged into CVS. The holders of the outstanding shares of
    CVS received, in exchange, shares of the Company on a
    one-for-one
    basis resulting in the issuance of 4,870,228 shares of
    common stock. On May 20, 2004, the Company and Trim
    Systems, Inc. (Trim) entered into an Agreement and
    Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the Company was merged
    into Trim (the CVS and Trim mergers are collectively referred to
    as the Mergers). On August 2, 2004, the Trim
    merger was effected. The holders of the outstanding shares of
    Trim received, in exchange, shares of the Company on a
    .099-for-one basis resulting in the issuance of
    2,769,567 shares of common stock. In accordance with
    SFAS No. 141, the Mergers were accounted for as a
    combination of entities under common control. Thus, the accounts
    of CVS, Trim and the Company were combined based upon their
    respective historical basis of accounting. The financial
    statements reflect the combined results of the Company, CVS and
    Trim as if the Mergers had occurred as of the beginning of the
    earliest period presented.
    
    1
 
 
    Recent
    Acquisitions
 
    In November 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding common
    stock of C.I.E.B. Kahovec, spol. s.r.o. (C.I.E.B.).
    See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements
    contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for detailed information on this transaction.
 
    Industry
 
    Within the commercial vehicle industry, we sell our products
    primarily to the heavy truck segment of the North American OEM
    market (approximately 60% of our 2006 revenues), the aftermarket
    and OEM service organizations (approximately 10% of our 2006
    revenues) and the construction segments of the global OEM market
    (approximately 18% of our 2006 revenues). The majority of our
    remaining 12% of 2006 revenues were to other global commercial
    vehicle and specialty markets.
 
    Commercial
    Vehicle Supply Market Overview
 
    Commercial vehicles are used in a wide variety of end markets,
    including local and long-haul commercial trucking, bus,
    construction, mining, general industrial, marine, municipal and
    recreation. The commercial vehicle supply industry can generally
    be separated into two categories: (1) sales to OEMs, in
    which products are sold in relatively large quantities directly
    for use by OEMs in new commercial vehicles; and
    (2) aftermarket sales, in which products are
    sold as replacements in varying quantities to a wide range of
    OEM service organizations, wholesalers, retailers and
    installers. In the OEM market, suppliers are generally divided
    into tiers  Tier 1 suppliers (like
    our company), who provide their products directly to OEMs, and
    Tier 2 or Tier 3 suppliers,
    who sell their products principally to other suppliers for
    integration into those suppliers own product offerings.
 
    Our largest end-market segment, the commercial truck industry,
    is supplied by heavy- and medium-duty commercial truck
    suppliers. The commercial truck supplier industry is highly
    fragmented and comprised of several large companies and many
    smaller companies. In addition, the Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) truck supplier industry is characterized by
    relatively low production volumes as well as considerable
    barriers to entry, including the following: (1) significant
    investment requirements, (2) stringent technical and
    manufacturing requirements, (3) high transition costs to
    shift production to new suppliers,
    (4) just-in-time
    delivery requirements and (5) strong brand name
    recognition. Foreign competition is limited in the North
    American commercial vehicle market due to many factors,
    including the need to be responsive to order changes on short
    notice, high shipping costs, customer concerns about quality
    given the safety aspect of many of our products and service
    requirements.
 
    Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
    new vehicle production, suppliers like us can also grow by
    increasing their product content per vehicle through cross
    selling and bundling of products, further penetrating business
    with existing customers and gaining new customers and expanding
    into new geographic markets. We believe that companies with a
    global presence and advanced technology, engineering,
    manufacturing and support capabilities, such as our company, are
    well positioned to take advantage of these opportunities.
 
    Commercial
    Truck Market
 
    Purchasers of commercial trucks include fleet operators, owner
    operators and other industrial end users. Commercial vehicles
    used for local and long-haul commercial trucking are generally
    classified by gross vehicle weight. Class 8 vehicles are
    trucks with gross vehicle weight in excess of 33,000 lbs. and
    Class 5
    
    2
 
    through 7 vehicles are trucks with gross vehicle weight from
    16,001 lbs. to 33,000 lbs. The following table shows commercial
    vehicle production levels for 2001 through 2006 in North America:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2001 |  |  | 2002 |  |  | 2003 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | (Thousands of units) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Class 8 heavy trucks
    
 |  |  | 146 |  |  |  | 181 |  |  |  | 182 |  |  |  | 269 |  |  |  | 341 |  |  |  | 378 |  | 
| 
    Class 5-7
    light and medium-duty trucks
    
 |  |  | 189 |  |  |  | 194 |  |  |  | 188 |  |  |  | 225 |  |  |  | 245 |  |  |  | 266 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
    
 |  |  | 335 |  |  |  | 375 |  |  |  | 370 |  |  |  | 494 |  |  |  | 586 |  |  |  | 644 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    Source: ACT Publications, The Commercial Truck, Bus and Trailer
    Industry OUTLOOK (February 2007).
 
    The following describes the major segments of the commercial
    vehicle market in which we compete:
 
    Class 8
    Truck Market
 
    The global Class 8 truck manufacturing market is
    concentrated in three primary regions: North America,
    Asia-Pacific and Europe. The global Class 8 truck market is
    localized in nature due to the following factors: (1) the
    prohibitive costs of shipping components from one region to
    another, (2) the high degree of customization of
    Class 8 trucks to meet the region-specific demands of end
    users, and (3) the ability to meet
    just-in-time
    delivery requirements. According to ACT, four companies
    represented approximately 97% of North American Class 8
    truck production in 2006. The percentages of Class 8
    production represented by Freightliner, PACCAR, Volvo/Mack and
    International were approximately 33%, 25%, 20% and 19%,
    respectively. We supply products to all of these OEMs.
 
    Production of commercial vehicles in North America peaked in
    1999 and experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 that was due
    to a weak economy, reduced sales following above-normal
    purchases in advance of new EPA emissions standards, an
    oversupply of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending
    on commercial vehicles and equipment. Following a substantial
    decline from 1999 to 2001, truck unit production increased
    modestly to approximately 181,000 units in 2002 from
    approximately 146,000 units produced in 2001, due primarily
    to the purchasing of trucks that occurred prior to the October
    2002 mandate for more stringent engine emissions requirements.
    Subsequent to the engine emissions requirements, truck
    production continued to remain at historically low levels due to
    the continuing economic recession and the reluctance of many
    trucking companies to invest during this period.
 
    In mid-2003, evidence of renewed growth emerged and truck
    tonmiles (number of miles driven multiplied by number of tons
    transported) began to increase. Accompanying the increase in
    truck tonmiles, new truck sales also began to increase. During
    the second half of 2003, new truck dealer inventories declined
    and, consequently, OEM truck order backlogs began to increase.
    According to ACT, monthly truck order rates began increasing
    significantly in December 2003 through 2005. In 2006, OEMs
    received larger than expected pre-orders in anticipation of the
    new EPA emissions standards becoming effective in 2007.
    
    3
 
 
    The following table illustrates North American Class 8
    truck build for the years 1998 to 2011:
 
    North
    American Class 8 Truck Build Rates
    (In thousands)
 
 
    E  Estimated
    Source: ACT Publications, Five Year Forecast (February 2007).
 
    According to ACT, unit production for 2007 is estimated to
    decrease approximately 43% from 2006 levels to approximately
    216,000 units. We believe that both the increase in 2006 as
    well as the projected decrease in 2007 are also impacted by the
    institution of more stringent EPA emissions standards in early
    2007. We believe the increase in 2006 was primarily the result
    of the following factors: (1) improvement in the general
    economy in North America, (2) corresponding growth in the
    movement of goods, (3) under investment during the
    recession and the growing need to replace aging truck fleets and
    (4) OEMs received larger than expected pre-orders in
    anticipation of the new EPA emissions standards becoming
    effective in 2007.
 
    We believe the following factors are currently driving the North
    American Class 8 truck market:
 
    Economic Conditions.  The North American truck
    industry is directly influenced by overall economic growth and
    consumer spending. Since truck OEMs supply the fleet lines of
    North America, their production levels generally match the
    demand for freight. The freight carried by these trucks includes
    consumer goods, machinery, food and beverages, construction
    equipment and supplies, electronic equipment and a wide variety
    of other materials. Since most of these items are driven by
    macroeconomic conditions, the truck industry tends to follow
    trends of gross domestic product (GDP). Generally,
    given the dependence of North American shippers on trucking as a
    freight alternative, general economic conditions have been a
    primary indicator of future truck builds.
 
    Truck Freight Growth.  ACT projects that total
    domestic truck freight will continue to increase over the next
    five years, driven by growth in GDP. In addition, national
    suppliers and distribution centers, burdened by the pricing
    pressure of large manufacturing and retail customers, have
    continued to reduce
    on-site
    inventory levels. This reduction requires freight handlers to
    provide
    to-the-hour
    delivery options. As a result, Class 8 trucks have replaced
    manufacturing warehouses as the preferred temporary storage
    facility for inventory. Since trucks are typically viewed as the
    most reliable and flexible shipping alternative, truck tonmiles,
    as well as truck platform improvements, should continue to
    increase in order to meet the increasing need for flexibility
    
    4
 
    under the
    just-in-time
    system. ACT forecasts that total heavy-duty truck tonmiles will
    increase from 3,750 billion in 2006 to an all time high of
    4,303 billion in 2011, as summarized in the following graph:
 
    Total
    U.S. Tonmiles (Class 8)
    (Number of tonmiles in billions)
 
 
    E  Estimated
    Source: ACT Publications, The Commercial Truck, Bus and Trailer
    Industry OUTLOOK (February 2007).
 
    Truck Replacement Cycle and Fleet Aging.  Since
    1995, the average age of active Class 8 trucks has
    increased from approximately 5.4 years in 1995 to
    approximately 5.7 years in 2006. The average fleet age
    tends to run in cycles as freight companies permit their truck
    fleets to age during periods of lagging demand and then
    replenish those fleets during periods of increasing demand.
    Additionally, as truck fleets age, their maintenance costs
    typically increase. Freight companies must therefore continually
    evaluate the economics between repair and replacement. Other
    factors, such as inventory management and the growth in
    less-than-truckload
    freight shipping, also tend to increase fleet mileage and, as a
    result, the truck replacement cycle. The chart below illustrates
    the average age of active U.S. Class 8 trucks:
 
    Average
    Age of Active U.S. Class 8 Trucks
    (Number of years)
 
 
    E  Estimated
    Source: ACT Research (2007).
    
    5
 
 
    Commercial
    Truck Aftermarket
 
    Demand for aftermarket products tends to be less cyclical than
    OEM demand because vehicle owners are more likely to repair
    vehicles than purchase new ones during recessionary periods, and
    thus aftermarket demand generally is more stable during such
    periods. Demand for aftermarket products is driven by the
    quality of OEM parts, the number of vehicles in operation, the
    average age of the vehicle fleet, vehicle usage, the average
    useful life of vehicle parts and total tonmiles. The aftermarket
    is a growing market, as the overall size of the North American
    fleet of Class 8 trucks has continued to increase and is
    attractive because of the recurring nature of the sales.
    Additionally, aftermarket sales tend to be at a higher margin,
    as truck component suppliers are able to leverage their already
    established fixed cost base and exert moderate pricing power
    with their replacement parts. The recurring nature of
    aftermarket revenue provides some insulation to the overall
    cyclical nature of the industry, as it tends to provide a more
    stable stream of revenues.
 
    Commercial
    Construction Vehicle Market
 
    Purchasers of heavy construction equipment (weighing over 12
    metric tons) include construction companies, municipalities,
    local governments, rental fleet owners, quarrying and mining
    companies, waste management companies and forestry related
    concerns. Purchasers of light construction equipment (weighing
    under 12 metric tons) include contractors, rental fleet owners,
    landscapers, logistics companies and farmers. Sales of heavy
    construction equipment are particularly dependent on the level
    of major infrastructure construction and repair projects such as
    highways, dams and harbors, which is a function of government
    spending and economic growth.
 
    Military
    Equipment Market
 
    We supply products for heavy- and medium-payload tactical trucks
    that are used by the U.S. military and other foreign
    militaries. Sales and production of these vehicles are
    influenced by overall defense spending both by the
    U.S. government and foreign governments and the presence of
    military conflicts and potential military conflicts throughout
    the world. Demand for these vehicles is expected to increase as
    the result of the continuing conflict in the Middle East. In
    addition, demand has increased for remanufacturing and
    replacement of the large fleet of vehicles that have served in
    the Middle East due to over-use and new armor and technology
    requirements.
 
    Commercial
    Vehicle Industry Trends
 
    Our performance and growth are directly related to trends in the
    commercial vehicle market that are focused on driver retention,
    comfort and safety. These commercial vehicle industry trends
    include the following:
 
    System Sourcing.  Commercial vehicle OEMs are
    beginning to seek suppliers capable of providing
    fully-engineered, complete systems rather than suppliers who
    produce the separate parts that comprise a system. By
    outsourcing complete systems, OEMs are able to reduce the costs
    associated with the design and integration of different
    components and improve quality by requiring their suppliers to
    assemble and test major portions of the vehicle prior to
    beginning production. In addition, OEMs are able to develop more
    efficient assembly processes when complete systems are delivered
    in sequence rather than as individual parts or components.
 
    Globalization of Suppliers.  To serve multiple
    markets more cost effectively, many commercial vehicle OEMs are
    manufacturing global vehicle platforms that are designed in a
    single location but are produced and sold in many different
    geographic markets around the world. Having operations in the
    geographic markets in which OEMs produce their global platforms
    enables suppliers to meet OEMs needs more economically and
    more efficiently.
 
    Shift of Design and Engineering to
    Suppliers.  OEMs are focusing their efforts on
    brand development and overall vehicle design, instead of the
    design of individual vehicle systems. OEMs are increasingly
    looking to their suppliers to provide suggestions for new
    products, designs, engineering developments and manufacturing
    processes. As a result, Tier 1 suppliers are gaining
    increased access to confidential planning information
    
    6
 
    regarding OEMs future vehicle designs and manufacturing
    processes. Systems and modules increase the importance of
    Tier 1 suppliers because they generally increase the
    Tier 1 suppliers percentage of vehicle content.
 
    Broad Manufacturing Capabilities.  With respect
    to commercial vehicle interiors, OEMs are requiring their
    suppliers to manufacture interior systems and products utilizing
    alternative materials and processes in order to meet OEMs
    demand for customized styling or cost requirements. In addition,
    while OEMs seek to differentiate their vehicles through the
    introduction of innovative interior features, suppliers are
    proactively developing new interior products with enhanced
    features.
 
    Ongoing Supplier Consolidation.  The worldwide
    commercial vehicle supply industry is in the early stages of
    consolidating as suppliers seek to achieve operating synergies
    through business combinations, shift production to locations
    with more flexible work rules and practices, acquire
    complementary technologies, build stronger customer
    relationships and follow their OEM customers as they expand
    globally. Suppliers need to provide OEMs with single-point
    sourcing of integrated systems and modules on a global basis,
    and this is expected to drive further industry consolidation.
    Furthermore, the cost focus of most major OEMs has forced
    suppliers to reduce costs and improve productivity on an ongoing
    basis, including by achieving economies of scale through
    consolidation.
 
    Competitive
    Strengths
 
    We believe that our competitive strengths include, but are not
    limited to, the following:
 
    Leading Market Positions and Brands.  We
    believe that we are the leading supplier of seating systems and
    interior trim products, the only non-captive manufacturer of
    Class 8 truck body systems (which includes cab body
    assemblies), the second largest supplier of wiper systems and
    mirrors for the North American commercial vehicle market and the
    largest global supplier of construction vehicle seating systems.
    Our products are marketed under brand names that are well known
    by our customers and truck fleet operators based upon the amount
    of revenue we derive from sales to these markets. These brands
    include KAB Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems, Sprague
    Controls, Sprague
    Devices®,
    Prutsmantm,
    Moto
    Mirror®,
    RoadWatch®,
    Mayflower®
    and C.I.E.B. The C.I.E.B. acquisition gave us a further
    penetration into the global commercial vehicle marketplace. We
    plan to leverage our customer relationships and dedicated sales
    force to cross-sell a broader range of products to position
    ourselves as the leading provider of complete cab systems to the
    commercial vehicle market.
 
    Comprehensive Cab Product and Cab System
    Solutions.  We believe that we offer the broadest
    product range of any commercial vehicle cab supplier. We
    manufacture a broad base of products, many of which are critical
    to the interior and exterior subsystems of a commercial vehicle
    cab. We believe we are the only supplier worldwide with the
    capability to manufacture and offer complete cab systems in
    sequence, integrating interior trim and seats with the cab
    structure and the electronic wire harness and instrument panel
    assemblies. We also utilize a variety of different processes,
    such as urethane molding, injection molding, Virtual Engineered
    Composites (VEC) large composite molding, vacuum
    forming and twin shell vacuum forming that enable us
    to meet each customers unique styling and cost
    requirements. The breadth of our product offering enables us to
    provide a one-stop shop for our customers, who
    increasingly require complete cab solutions from a single supply
    source. As a result, we believe that we have a substantial
    opportunity for further customer penetration through
    cross-selling initiatives and by bundling our products to
    provide complete system solutions.
 
    End-User Focused Product Innovation.  A key
    trend in the commercial vehicle market is that OEMs are
    increasingly focused on cab design, comfort and features to
    better serve their end user, the driver, and our customers are
    seeking suppliers that can provide product innovation. We have a
    full service engineering and product development organization
    that proactively presents solutions to OEMs to meet these needs
    and enables us to increase our overall content on current
    platforms and models.
 
    Flexible Manufacturing Capabilities and Cost Competitive
    Position.  Because commercial vehicle OEMs permit
    their customers to select from an extensive menu of cab options,
    our customers frequently request
    
    7
 
    modified products in low volumes within a limited time frame. We
    have a highly variable cost structure and can efficiently
    leverage our flexible manufacturing capabilities to provide low
    volume, customized products to meet each customers
    styling, cost and
    just-in-time
    delivery requirements. We manufacture or assemble our products
    at facilities in North America, Europe, China and Australia.
    Several of our facilities are located near our customers to
    reduce distribution costs and to maintain a high level of
    customer service and flexibility.
 
    Strong Free Cash Flow Generation.  Our business
    generates strong free cash flow, as it benefits from modest
    capital expenditure and working capital requirements. Over the
    three years ended December 31, 2006, our consolidated
    capital expenditures averaged $17.3 million per year, which
    amounts to approximately 2.5% of consolidated net revenues.
 
    Strong Relationships with Leading Customers and Major
    Fleets.  Because of our comprehensive product
    offerings, leading Class 8 brand names and innovative
    product features, we believe we are an important long-term
    supplier to all of the leading truck manufacturers in North
    America and also a global supplier to leading heavy equipment
    customers such as Caterpillar, Oshkosh Truck, Deere &
    Co., Komatsu and Volvo. In addition, through our sales force and
    engineering teams, we maintain active relationships with the
    major truck fleet organizations that are end users of our
    products such as Yellow Freight, Swift Transportation, Schneider
    National and Ryder Leasing. As a result of our high-quality,
    innovative products, well-recognized brand names and customer
    service, a majority of the largest 100 fleet operators
    specifically request certain of our products.
 
    Significant Barriers to Entry.  We believe we
    are a leader in providing critical cab assemblies and components
    to long running platforms. Considerable barriers to entry exist,
    including significant investment and engineering requirements,
    stringent technical and manufacturing requirements, high
    transition costs for OEMs to shift production to new suppliers,
    just-in-time
    delivery requirements and strong brand name recognition.
 
    Proven Management Team.  Our management team is
    highly respected within the commercial vehicle market, and our
    five senior executive officers have a combined average of
    28 years of experience in the industry. We believe that our
    team has substantial depth in critical operational areas and has
    demonstrated success in reducing costs, integrating business
    acquisitions and improving processes through cyclical periods.
 
    Strategy
 
    Our primary growth strategies are as follows:
 
    Increase Content, Expand Customer Penetration and Leverage
    System Opportunities.  We believe we are the only
    integrated commercial vehicle supplier that can offer complete
    interior cab systems. We are focused on securing additional
    sales from our existing customer base, and we actively
    cross-market a diverse portfolio of products to our customers to
    increase our content on the cabs manufactured by these OEMs. To
    complement our North American capabilities and enhance our
    customer relationships, we are working with OEMs as they
    increase their focus on international markets. We have
    established operations in Europe and Asia and are aggressively
    working to secure new business from both existing and new
    customers with local manufacturing operations and local OEMs. We
    believe we are well positioned to capitalize on the migration by
    OEMs in the heavy truck and commercial vehicle sector towards
    commercial vehicle suppliers that can offer a complete interior
    system and components.
 
    Leverage Our New Product Development
    Capabilities.  We have made a significant
    investment in our engineering capabilities and new product
    development in order to anticipate the evolving demands of our
    customers and end users. For example, we recently introduced our
    VEC technology molding capability which has significant
    advantages over current processes including environmental,
    superior finish, durability and cost. In addition, we believe
    that our new All Belts to Seat (ABTS) design should
    enable us to capture additional market share in the North
    American bus market and provide us with opportunities to market
    this seat on a global basis. We will continue to design and
    develop new products that add or improve content and increase
    cab comfort and safety.
 
    Capitalize on Operating Leverage.  We
    continuously seek ways to lower costs, enhance product quality,
    improve manufacturing efficiencies and increase product
    throughput and we continue to implement our Lean
    
    8
 
    Manufacturing and Total Quality Production Systems
    (TQPS) programs. We believe our ongoing cost saving
    initiatives and the establishment of our sourcing relationships
    in Europe and Asia will enable us to continue to lower our
    manufacturing costs. As a result, we are well positioned to grow
    our operating margins and capitalize on any volume increases in
    the heavy truck sector with minimal additional capital
    expenditures. With the integration of our acquisitions, our
    management will be pursuing cost reduction opportunities which
    include: consolidating supplier relationships to achieve lower
    costs and better terms, strategic sourcing of products to OEMs
    from new facility locations, implementing lean manufacturing
    techniques to achieve operational efficiencies, improving
    product quality and delivery and providing additional capacity.
 
    Grow Sales to the Aftermarket.  While
    commercial vehicles have a relatively long life, certain
    components, such as seats, wipers and mirrors, are replaced more
    frequently. We believe that there are opportunities to leverage
    our brand recognition to increase our sales to the replacement
    aftermarket. Since many aftermarket participants are small and
    locally focused, we plan to leverage our national presence to
    increase our market share in the fragmented aftermarket. We
    believe that the continued growth in the aftermarket represents
    an attractive opportunity to diversify our business due to its
    relative stability as well as the market penetration opportunity.
 
    Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Continue to Diversify
    Sales.  We will selectively pursue complementary
    strategic acquisitions that allow us to leverage the marketing,
    engineering and manufacturing strengths of our business and
    expand our sales to new and existing customers. The markets in
    which we operate are highly fragmented and provide ample
    consolidation opportunities. Recent acquisitions have enabled us
    to be a leading supplier worldwide to offer complete cab systems
    in sequence, integrating interior trim and seats with the cab
    structure, to provide integrated electronic systems into our cab
    products and to expand the breadth of our interior systems
    capabilities. In addition, these acquisitions have allowed us to
    diversify our revenue base by customer, market or product
    offering.
 
    Products
 
    We offer OEMs a broad range of products and system solutions for
    a variety of end market vehicle applications that include local
    and long-haul commercial truck, bus, construction, agricultural,
    military, end market industrial, marine, municipal and
    recreation. Fleets and OEMs are increasing their focus on cabs
    and their interiors to differentiate products and improve driver
    comfort and retention. Although a portion of our products are
    sold directly to OEMs as finished components, we use most of our
    products to produce systems or
    subsystems, which are groups of component parts
    located throughout the vehicle that operate together to provide
    a specific vehicle function. Systems currently produced by us
    include cab bodies, sleeper boxes, seating, trim, body panels,
    storage cabinets, floor covering, mirrors, windshield wipers,
    headliners, window lifts, door locks, temperature measurement
    and wire harnesses. We classify our products into five general
    categories: (1) seats and seating systems, (2) trim
    systems and components, (3) mirrors, wipers and controls,
    (4) cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and
    structural components and (5) electronic wire harnesses and
    panel assemblies.
 
    See Notes 2 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements
    in Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for information on our significant customer revenues and related
    receivables, as well as revenues by product category and
    geographical location.
 
    Set forth below is a brief description of our products and their
    applications:
 
    Seats and Seating Systems.  We design,
    engineer and produce seating systems primarily for heavy trucks
    in North America and for commercial vehicles used in the
    construction and agricultural industries through our European
    operations. For the most part, our seats and seating systems are
    fully-assembled and ready for installation when they are
    delivered to the OEM. We offer a wide range of seats that
    include air suspension seats, static seats, bus seats and rail
    car seats. As a result of our strong product design and product
    technology, we are a leader in designing seats with convenience
    features and enhanced safety. Seats and seating systems are the
    most complex and highly specialized products of our five product
    categories.
    
    9
 
 
    Heavy Truck Seats.  We produce seats and
    seating systems for Heavy-duty (Class 8) trucks in our
    North American operations. Our heavy truck seating systems are
    designed to achieve maximum driver comfort by adding a wide
    range of manual and power features such as lumbar supports,
    cushion and back bolsters and leg and thigh supports. Our heavy
    truck seats are highly specialized based on a variety of
    different seating options offered in OEM product lines. Our
    seats are built to customer specifications in low volumes and
    consequently are produced in numerous combinations with a wide
    range of price points. There are approximately 350 parts in each
    seat, resulting in over two million possible seat combinations.
 
    We differentiate our seats from our competitors seats by
    focusing on three principal goals: driver comfort, driver
    retention and decreased workers compensation claims.
    Drivers of heavy trucks recognize and are often given the
    opportunity to specify their choice of seat brands, and we
    strive to develop strong customer loyalty both with the
    commercial vehicle OEMs and among the drivers. We believe that
    we have superior technology and can offer a unique seat base
    that is ergonomically designed, accommodates a range of driver
    sizes and absorbs shock to maximize driver comfort.
 
    Other Commercial Vehicle Seats.  We produce
    seats and seating systems for commercial vehicles used in the
    global construction and agricultural, bus, commercial transport
    and municipal industries. The principal focus of these seating
    systems is durability. These seats are ergonomically designed
    for difficult working environments, to provide comfort and
    control throughout the range of seats and chairs.
 
    Other Seating Products.  We also manufacture
    office seating products. Our office chair was developed as a
    result of our experience supplying chairs for the heavy truck,
    agricultural and construction industries and is fully adjustable
    to maximize comfort at work. Our office chairs are available in
    a wide variety of colors and fabrics to suit many different
    office environments, such as emergency services, call centers,
    receptions, studios, boardrooms and general office.
 
    Trim Systems and Components.  We design,
    engineer and produce trim systems and components for the
    interior cabs of commercial vehicles. Our interior trim products
    are designed to provide a comfortable interior for the vehicle
    occupants as well as a variety of functional and safety
    features. The wide variety of features that can be selected by
    the heavy truck customer makes trim systems and components a
    complex and highly specialized product category. Set forth below
    is a brief description of our principal trim systems and
    components:
 
    Trim Products.  Our trim products include
    A-Pillars, B-Pillars, door panels and interior trim panels. Door
    panels consist of several component parts that are attached to a
    substrate. Specific components include vinyl or cloth-covered
    appliqués, armrests, map pocket compartments, carpet and
    sound-reducing insulation. In addition, door panels often
    incorporate electronic and electrical distribution systems and
    products, including lock and latch, window glass, window
    regulators and audio systems as well as wire harnesses for the
    control of power seats, windows, mirrors and door locks. Our
    products are attractive, lightweight solutions from a
    traditional cut and sew approach to a contemporary
    molded styling theme. The parts can be color matched
    or top good wrapped to integrate seamlessly with the rest of the
    interior.
 
    Instrument Panels.  We produce and assemble
    instrument panels that can be integrated with the rest of the
    interior trim. The instrument panel is a complex system of
    coverings and foam, plastic and metal parts designed to house
    various components and act as a safety device for the vehicle
    occupant.
 
    Body Panels (Headliners/Wall
    Panels).  Headliners consist of a substrate and a
    finished interior layer made of fabrics and materials. While
    headliners are an important contributor to interior aesthetics,
    they also provide insulation from road noise and can serve as
    carriers for a variety of other components, such as visors,
    overhead consoles, grab handles, coat hooks, electrical wiring,
    speakers, lighting and other electronic and electrical products.
    As the amount of electronic and electrical content available in
    vehicles has increased, headliners have emerged as an important
    carrier of electronic features such as lighting systems.
 
    Storage Systems.  Our modular storage units and
    custom cabinetry are designed to improve comfort and convenience
    for the driver. These storage systems are designed to be
    integrated with the interior trim. These units may be easily
    expanded and customized with features that include
    refrigerators, sinks and water
    
    10
 
    reservoirs. Our storage systems are constructed with durable
    materials and designed to last the life of the vehicle.
 
    Floor Covering Systems.  We have an extensive
    and comprehensive portfolio of floor covering systems and dash
    insulators. Carpet flooring systems generally consist of tufted
    or non-woven carpet with a thermoplastic backcoating which, when
    heated, allows the carpet to be fitted precisely to the interior
    or trunk compartment of the vehicle. Additional insulation
    materials are added to minimize noise, vibration and harshness.
    Non-carpeted flooring systems, used primarily in commercial and
    fleet vehicles, offer improved wear and maintenance
    characteristics. The dash insulator separates the passenger
    compartment from the engine compartment and prevents engine
    noise and heat from entering the passenger compartment.
 
    Sleeper Bunks.  We offer a wide array of design
    choices for upper and lower sleeper bunks for heavy trucks. All
    parts of our sleeper bunks can be integrated to match the rest
    of the interior trim. Our sleeper bunks arrive at OEMs fully
    assembled and ready for installation.
 
    Grab Handles and Armrests.  Our grab handles
    and armrests are designed and engineered with specific attention
    to aesthetics, ergonomics and strength. Our
    T-Skintm
    product uses a wide range of inserts and substrates for
    structural integrity. The integral urethane skin offers a soft
    touch and can be in-mold coated to specific colors.
 
    Bumper Fascias and Fender Covers.  Our highly
    durable, lightweight bumper fascias and fender covers are
    capable of withstanding repeated impacts that would deform an
    aluminum or steel bumper. We utilize a production technique that
    chemically bonds a layer of paint to the part after it has been
    molded, thereby enabling the part to keep its appearance even
    after repeated impacts.
 
    Privacy Curtains.  We produce privacy curtains
    for use in sleeper cabs. Our privacy curtains include features
    such as integrated color matching of both sides of the curtain,
    choice of cloth or vinyl, full black out features
    and low-weight.
 
    Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  We
    design, engineer and produce a wide range of mirrors, wipers and
    controls used in commercial vehicles. Set forth below is a brief
    description of our principal products in this category:
 
    Mirrors.  We offer a wide range of round,
    rectangular, motorized and heated mirrors and related hardware,
    including brackets, braces and side bars. Most of our mirror
    designs utilize stainless steel pins, fasteners and support
    braces to ensure durability. We have introduced both road and
    outside temperature devices that are integrated into the mirror
    face or the vehicles dashboard through our
    RoadWatchtm
    family of products. These systems are principally utilized by
    municipalities throughout North America to monitor surface
    temperatures and assist them in dispersing chemicals for snow
    and ice removal.
 
    Windshield Wiper Systems.  We offer
    application-specific windshield wiper systems and individual
    windshield wiper components for all segments of the commercial
    vehicle market. Our windshield wiper systems are generally
    delivered to the OEM fully assembled and ready for installation.
    A windshield wiper system is typically comprised of an electric
    motor, linkages, arms, wiper blades, washer reservoirs and
    related pneumatic or electric pumps. We also supply air-assisted
    washing systems for headlights and cameras to assist drivers
    with visibility for safe vehicle operation. These systems
    utilize window wash fluid and air to create a turbulent
    liquid/air stream that removes road grime from headlights and
    cameras. We offer an optional programmable washing system that
    allows for periodic washing and dry cycles for maximum safety.
 
    Controls.  We offer a range of controls and
    control systems that includes a complete line of window lifts
    and door locks, mechanic, pneumatic, electrical and electronic
    HVAC controls and electric switch products. We specialize in
    air-powered window lifts and door locks, which are highly
    reliable and cost effective as compared to similar electrical
    products.
 
    Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components.  We design, engineer and produce
    complete cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and
    structural components for the commercial
    
    11
 
    vehicle and automotive industries in North America. Set forth
    below is a description of our principal products in this
    category:
 
    Cab Structures.  We design, manufacture and
    assemble complete cab structures used primarily in heavy trucks
    for the major commercial vehicle OEMs in North America. Our cab
    structures, which are manufactured from both steel and aluminum,
    are delivered to our customers fully assembled and primed for
    paint. Our cab structures are built to order based upon options
    selected by the vehicles end-users and delivered to the
    OEMs, in line sequence, as these end-users trucks are
    manufactured by the OEMs. In addition, we also design, produce
    and assemble cab structures for certain automotive OEMs.
 
    Sleeper Boxes.  We design, manufacture and
    assemble sleeper boxes primarily for heavy trucks in North
    America. We manufacture both integrated sleeper boxes that are
    part of the overall cab structure as well as stand alone
    assemblies depending on the customer application. Sleeper boxes
    are typically constructed using aluminum exterior panels in
    combination with steel structural components delivered to our
    customers in line sequence after the final seal and
    E-coat
    process.
 
    Body Panels and Structural Components.  We
    produce a wide range of both steel and aluminum large exterior
    body panels and structural components for the internal
    production of our cab structures and sleeper boxes as well as
    being sold externally to certain commercial vehicle and
    automotive OEMs.
 
    Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  We design, engineer and produce a
    wide range of electronic wire harnesses and related assemblies
    as well as panel assemblies used in commercial vehicles and
    other equipment. Set forth below is a brief description of our
    principal products in this category.
 
    Electronic Wire Harnesses.  We offer a broad
    range of complex electronic wire harness assemblies that
    function as the primary current carrying devices used to provide
    electrical interconnections for gauges, lights, control
    functions, power circuits and other electronic applications on a
    commercial vehicle. Our wire harnesses are highly customized to
    fit specific end-user requirements and often include more than
    350 individual circuits and weigh more than 30 pounds. We
    provide our wire harnesses for a wide variety of commercial
    vehicles, military vehicles, specialty trucks and other
    specialty applications, including heavy-industrial equipment.
 
    Panel Assemblies.  We assemble large,
    integrated components such as panel assemblies and cabinets for
    commercial vehicle OEMs, other heavy equipment manufacturers and
    medical equipment manufacturers. The panels and cabinets we
    assemble are installed in key locations on a vehicle or unit of
    equipment, are integrated with our wire harness assemblies and
    provide user control over certain operational functions and
    features.
 
    Manufacturing
 
    A description of the manufacturing processes we utilize for each
    of our principal product categories is set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Seats and Seating Systems.  Our seating
    operations utilize a variety of manufacturing techniques whereby
    fabric is affixed to an underlying seat frame. We also
    manufacture and assemble the seat frame, which involves complex
    welding. Generally, we utilize outside suppliers to produce the
    individual components used to assemble the seat frame. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Trim Systems and Components.  Our interior
    systems process capabilities include injection molding,
    low-pressure injection molding, urethane molding and foaming
    processes, compression molding and vacuum forming as well as
    various trimming and finishing methods. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  We manufacture
    our mirrors, wipers and controls utilizing a variety of
    manufacturing processes and techniques. Our mirrors, wipers and
    controls are primarily hand assembled, tested and packaged. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components.  We utilize a wide range of
    manufacturing processes to produce the majority of the steel and
    aluminum stampings used in our cab structures, sleeper boxes,
    body panels and structural components and a variety of both
    robotic and manual welding techniques in the assembly of these
    products. In addition, both our Norwalk, Ohio and | 
    
    12
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Kings Mountain, North Carolina facilities have large capacity,
    fully automated
    E-coat paint
    priming systems allowing us to provide our customers with a
    paint-ready cab product. Due to their high cost, full body
    E-coat
    systems, such as ours, are rarely found outside of the
    manufacturing operations of the major OEMs. The major large
    press lines at our Shadyside, Ohio facility provide us with the
    in-house manufacturing flexibility for both aluminum and steel
    stampings delivered
    just-in-time
    to our cab assembly plants. This plant also provides us with low
    volume forming and processing techniques including laser trim
    operations that minimize investment and time to manufacture for
    low volume applications. | 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  We utilize several manufacturing
    techniques to produce the majority of our electronic wire
    harnesses and panel assemblies. Our processes, both manual and
    automated, are designed to produce complex, low- to
    medium-volume wire harnesses and panel assemblies in short time
    frames. Our wire harnesses and panel assemblies are both
    electronically and hand tested. | 
 
    We have a broad array of processes to offer our commercial
    vehicle OEM customers to enable us to meet their styling and
    cost requirements. We believe the interior of the vehicle cab is
    the most significant and appealing aspect to the driver of the
    vehicle, and consequently each commercial vehicle OEM has unique
    requirements as to feel, appearance and features.
 
    The end markets for our products are highly specialized and our
    customers frequently request modified products in low volumes
    within an expedited delivery timeframe. As a result, we
    primarily utilize flexible manufacturing cells at the vast
    majority of our production facilities. Manufacturing cells are
    clusters of individual manufacturing operations and work
    stations grouped in a circular configuration, with the operators
    placed centrally within the configuration. This provides
    flexibility by allowing efficient changes to the number of
    operations each operator performs. When compared to the more
    traditional, less flexible assembly line process, cell
    manufacturing allows us to maintain our product output
    consistent with our OEM customers requirements and reduce
    the level of inventory.
 
    When an end-user buys a commercial vehicle, the end-user will
    specify the seat and other features for that vehicle. Because
    each of our seating systems is unique, our manufacturing
    facilities have significant complexity which we manage by
    building in sequence. We build our seating systems as orders are
    received, and systems are delivered to the customers rack
    in the sequence that the vehicles come down the assembly line.
    We have systems in place that allow us to provide complete
    customized interior kits in boxes that are delivered in
    sequence, and we intend to expand upon these systems such that
    we will be able to provide, in sequence, fully integrated
    modular systems combining the cab body and interior and seating
    systems.
 
    In most instances, we keep track of our build sequence by
    vehicle identification number and components are identified by
    bar code. Sequencing reduces our cost of production because it
    eliminates warehousing costs and reduces waste and obsolescence,
    offsetting any increased labor costs. Several of our
    manufacturing facilities are strategically located near our
    customers assembly plants, which facilitates this process
    and minimizes shipping costs.
 
    We employ
    just-in-time
    manufacturing and system sourcing in our operations to meet
    customer requirements for faster deliveries and to minimize our
    need to carry significant inventory levels. We utilize visual
    material systems to manage inventory levels and, in certain
    locations, we have inventory delivered as often as two times per
    day from a nearby facility based on the previous days
    order. This eliminates the need to carry excess inventory at our
    facilities.
 
    Typically, in a strong economy, new vehicle production increases
    and greater funding is available to be spent on enhancements to
    the truck interior. As demand goes up, the mix of our products
    shifts towards more expensive systems, such as sleeper units,
    with enhanced features and higher quality materials. The shift
    from low-end units to high-end units amplifies the positive
    effect a strong economy has on our business. Conversely, when
    economic conditions and indicators decline and customers shift
    away from ordering high-end units with enhanced features, our
    business is adversely affected from both lower volume and lower
    pricing. We strive to manage down cycles by running our
    facilities at capacity while maintaining the capability and
    flexibility to
    
    13
 
    expand. We work with our employees and rely on their involvement
    to help eliminate problems and re-align our capacity. During a
    ramp-up of
    production, we have plans in place to manage increased demand
    and achieve on-time delivery. Our strategies include alternating
    between human and machine production and allowing existing
    employees to try higher skilled positions while hiring new
    employees for lower skilled positions.
 
    As a means to enhance our operations, we continue to implement
    TQPS throughout our operations. TQPS is our customized version
    of Lean Manufacturing and consists of a 32 hour interactive
    class that is taught exclusively by members of our management
    team. A significant portion of the labor efficiencies we gained
    over the past few years is due to the program. TQPS is an
    analytical process in which we analyze each of our manufacturing
    cells and identify the most efficient process to improve
    efficiency and quality. The goal is to achieve total cost
    management and continuous improvement. Some examples of
    TQPS-related improvements are: reduced labor to move parts
    around the facility, clear walking paths in and around
    manufacturing cells and increased safety. An ongoing goal is to
    reduce the time employees spend waiting for materials within a
    facility. In an effort to increase operational efficiency,
    improve product quality and provide additional capacity, we
    intend to continue to implement TQPS improvements at each of our
    manufacturing facilities.
 
    Raw
    Materials and Suppliers
 
    A description of the principal raw materials we utilize for each
    of our principal product categories is set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Seats and Seating Systems.  The principal raw
    materials used in our seat systems include steel, aluminum and
    foam chemicals, and are generally readily available and obtained
    from multiple suppliers under various supply agreements.
    Leather, vinyl, fabric and certain components are also purchased
    from multiple suppliers under supply agreements. Typically, our
    supply agreements are for a term of at least one year and are
    terminable by us for breach or convenience. Some purchased
    components are obtained from our customers. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Trim Systems and Components.  The principal raw
    materials used in our interior systems processes are resin and
    chemical products, foam, vinyl and fabric which are formed and
    assembled into end products. These raw materials are obtained
    from multiple suppliers, typically under supply agreements which
    are for a term of at least one year and are terminable by us for
    breach or convenience. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  The principal
    raw materials used to manufacture our mirrors, wipers and
    controls are steel, stainless steel, aluminum, glass and rubber,
    which are generally readily available and obtained from multiple
    suppliers. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components.  The principal raw materials used in
    our cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and structural
    components are steel and aluminum, the majority of which we
    purchase in sheets and stamp at our Shadyside, Ohio facility.
    These raw materials are generally readily available and obtained
    from several suppliers, typically under purchase orders that are
    cancellable by us without cause, pursuant to one year supply
    agreements. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  The principal raw materials used to
    manufacture our electronic wire harnesses are wire, connectors,
    terminals, switches, relays and braid fabric. These raw
    materials are obtained from multiple suppliers and are generally
    readily available. Many of our customers specify particular wire
    and connectors and, as such, negotiate pricing of these
    materials directly with our suppliers. Our panel assembly
    materials are generally procured directly from the customer. | 
 
    Our supply agreements generally provide for fixed pricing but do
    not require us to purchase any specified quantities. We have not
    experienced any significant shortages of raw materials and
    normally do not carry inventories of raw materials or finished
    products in excess of those reasonably required to meet
    production and shipping schedules as well as service
    requirements. We purchase materials such as steel, foam, vinyl
    and cloth in large quantities on a global basis through our
    central corporate office, and other materials for which we
    require lower volumes are purchased directly by our facilities.
    We purchase steel and copper at market
    
    14
 
    prices, which during the last year, have increased
    significantly. As a result, we are currently being assessed
    surcharges and price increases on certain of our purchases of
    steel, copper and petroleum-related products. We continue to
    work with our customers and suppliers to minimize the impact of
    such surcharges. We do not believe we are dependent on a single
    supplier or limited group of suppliers for our raw materials.
 
    Customers
    and Marketing
 
    We sell our products principally to the commercial vehicle OEM
    truck market. Approximately 60% of our 2006 revenues and
    approximately 62% of our 2005 revenues were derived from sales
    to commercial vehicle truck OEMs, with the remainder of our
    revenues being generated principally from sales to the
    construction and aftermarket.
 
    We supply our products primarily to the heavy truck OEM market,
    construction market, the aftermarket and OEM service segment and
    other commercial vehicle and specialty markets. The following is
    a summary of our revenues by end-user market for the three years
    ended December 31:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Heavy Truck OEM
    
 |  |  | 60 | % |  |  | 62 | % |  |  | 56 | % | 
| 
    Construction
    
 |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 18 |  | 
| 
    Aftermarket and OEM Service
    
 |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 15 |  | 
| 
    Bus
    
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Military
    
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Agriculture
    
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Other
    
 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 9 |  |  |  | 6 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
    
 |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The change in revenues by end market in 2006 is primarily
    related to the increased demand in the North American
    (Class 8) heavy truck market and the full year impact
    of the Mayflower Vehicle Systems (Mayflower), Monona
    Wire Corporation (Monona) and Cabarrus Plastics,
    Inc. (Cabarrus) acquisitions.
 
    Our principal customers in North America include International,
    PACCAR, Freightliner, Volvo/Mack and Caterpillar. We believe we
    are an important long-term supplier to all leading truck
    manufacturers in North America because of our comprehensive
    product offerings, leading brand names and product innovation.
    In our European and Asian operations, our principal customers in
    the commercial vehicle market include Caterpillar, Komatsu,
    Hitachi, CNH Global (Case New Holland) and JCB Limited. We also
    sell our trim products to OEMs in the marine and recreational
    vehicle industries and seating products to office product
    manufacturers principally in Europe.
 
    The following is a summary of our significant revenues by OEM
    customer for the three years ended December 31:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    International
    
 |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 19 | % |  |  | 9 | % | 
| 
    PACCAR
    
 |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 28 |  | 
| 
    Freightliner
    
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  | 17 |  | 
| 
    Volvo/Mack
    
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 6 |  | 
| 
    Caterpillar
    
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
| 
    Komatsu
    
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 3 |  | 
| 
    Deere & Co. 
    
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Oshkosh Truck
    
 |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other
    
 |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 31 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
    
 |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    15
 
    Except as set forth in the above table, no other customer
    accounted for more than 10% of our revenues for the three years
    ended December 31, 2006. The change in revenues by
    significant OEM customers in 2006 is primarily related to the
    increased demand in the North American (Class 8) heavy
    truck market and the full year impact of the Mayflower, Monona
    and Cabarrus acquisitions.
 
    Our European, China and Australian operations collectively
    contributed approximately 13%, 16% and 28% of our revenues for
    the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
    respectively. The change in revenue by geographic location in
    2006 is primarily related to the full year impact of the
    Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus acquisitions and the higher North
    American truck build rates resulting from the new EPA emissions
    standards effective in 2007.
 
    Our OEM customers generally source business to us pursuant to
    written contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments in
    terms of price, quality, technology and delivery. Awarded
    business generally covers the supply of all or a portion of a
    customers production and service requirements for a
    particular product program rather than the supply of a specific
    quantity of products. In general, these contracts, purchase
    orders and commitments provide that the customer can terminate
    the contract, purchase order or commitment if we do not meet
    specified quality, delivery and cost requirements. Such
    contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments generally
    extend for the entire life of a platform, which is typically
    five to seven years. Although these contracts, purchase orders
    or other commitments may be terminated at any time by our
    customers (but not by us), such terminations have been minimal
    and have not had a material impact on our results of operations.
    In order to reduce our reliance on any one vehicle model, we
    produce products for a broad cross-section of both new and more
    established models.
 
    Our contracts with our major OEM customers generally provide for
    an annual productivity cost reduction. These reductions are
    calculated on an annual basis as a percentage of the previous
    years purchases by each customer. The reduction is
    achieved through engineering changes, material cost reductions,
    logistics savings, reductions in packaging cost and labor
    efficiencies. Historically, most of these cost reductions have
    been offset by both internal reductions and through the
    assistance of our supply base, although no assurances can be
    given that we will be able to achieve such reductions in the
    future. If the annual reduction targets are not achieved, the
    difference is recovered through price reductions. Our cost
    structure is comprised of a high percentage of variable costs
    that provides us with additional flexibility during economic
    cycles.
 
    Our sales and marketing efforts with respect to our OEM sales
    are designed to create overall awareness of our engineering,
    design and manufacturing capabilities and to enable us to be
    selected to supply products for new and redesigned models by our
    OEM customers. Our sales and marketing staff works closely with
    our design and engineering personnel to prepare the materials
    used for bidding on new business as well as to provide a
    consistent interface between us and our key customers. We
    currently have sales and marketing personnel located in every
    major region in which we operate. From time to time, we also
    participate in industry trade shows and advertise in industry
    publications. One of our ongoing initiatives is to negotiate and
    enter into long term supply agreements with our existing
    customers that allow us to leverage all of our business and
    provide a complete cab system to our commercial vehicle OEM
    customers.
 
    Our principal customers for our aftermarket sales include OEM
    dealers and independent wholesale distributors. Our sales and
    marketing efforts for our aftermarket sales are focused on
    support of these two distribution chains, as well as direct
    contact with all major fleets.
 
    Backlog
 
    We do not generally obtain long-term, firm purchase orders from
    our customers. Rather, our customers typically place annual
    blanket purchase orders, but these orders do not obligate them
    to purchase any specific or minimum amount of products from us
    until a release is issued by the customer under the blanket
    purchase order. Releases are typically placed within 30 to
    90 days of required delivery and may be canceled at any
    time, in which case the customer would be liable for work in
    process and finished goods. We do not believe that our backlog
    of expected product sales covered by firm purchase orders is a
    meaningful indicator of future sales since orders may be
    rescheduled or canceled.
    
    16
 
 
    Competition
 
    Within each of our principal product categories, we compete with
    a variety of independent suppliers and with OEMs in-house
    operations, primarily on the basis of price, breadth of product
    offerings, product quality, technical expertise, development
    capability, product delivery and product service. We believe we
    are the only supplier in the North American commercial vehicle
    market that can offer complete cab systems in sequence
    integrating interior systems (including seats, interior trim and
    flooring systems) and wire harnesses with the cab structure. A
    summary of our estimated market position and primary independent
    competitors is set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Seats and Seating Systems.  We believe that we
    have the number one market position in North America with
    respect to our seating operations. We also believe that we have
    the number one market position in supplying seats and seating
    systems to commercial vehicles used in the construction industry
    on a worldwide basis. Our primary independent competitors in the
    North American commercial vehicle market include Sears
    Manufacturing Company, Accuride Corporation, Grammer AG and
    Seats, Inc., and our primary competitors in the European
    commercial vehicle market include Grammar and Isringhausen. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Trim Systems and Components.  We believe that
    we have the number one market position in North America with
    respect to our interior trim products. We face competition from
    a number of different competitors with respect to each of our
    trim system products and components. Overall, our primary
    independent competitors are ConMet, Fabriform, TPI, Findlay,
    Superior, Trim Masters, Inc., Blachford Ltd., Gage Industries,
    Inc. and Mitras. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  We believe that
    we have the number two market position in North America with
    respect to our windshield wiper systems and mirrors. We face
    competition from a number of different competitors with respect
    to each of our principal products in this category. Our
    principal competitors for mirrors are Hadley, Lang-Mekra and
    Trucklite, and our principal competitors for windshield wiper
    systems are Johnson Electric, Trico and Valeo. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components.  We believe we are a leading
    non-captive supplier in North America with respect to our cab
    structural components, cab structures, sleeper boxes and body
    panels. Our principal competitors are Magna, Ogihara
    Corporation, Spartanburg Stamping, Union Stamping, Able Body and
    Defiance Metal Products. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  We believe that we are a leading
    producer of low- to medium-volume complex, electronic wire
    harnesses and related assemblies used in the global heavy
    equipment, commercial vehicle, heavy-truck and specialty and
    military vehicle markets. Our principal competitors for
    electronic wire harnesses include large diversified suppliers
    such as AFL, Delphi, Leoni, Stoneridge, Yazaki and smaller
    independent companies such as Fargo Assembly and Unlimited
    Services. | 
 
    Research
    and Development, Design and Engineering
 
    Our objective is to be a leader in offering superior quality and
    technologically advanced products to our customers at
    competitive prices. We engage in ongoing engineering and
    research and development activities to improve the reliability,
    performance and cost-effectiveness of our existing products and
    to design and develop new products for existing and new
    applications.
 
    We work with our customers engineering and development
    teams at the beginning of the design process for new components
    and assemblies, or the redesign process for existing components
    and assemblies, in order to maximize production efficiency and
    quality. These processes may take place from one to three years
    prior to the commencement of production. On average, the
    development time for a new component takes between 12 and
    24 months during the design phase, while the re-engineering
    of an existing part may take between one and six months. Early
    design involvement can result in a product that meets or exceeds
    the customers design and performance requirements and is
    more efficient to manufacture. In addition, our extensive
    involvement
    
    17
 
    enhances our position for bidding on such business. We work
    aggressively to ensure that our quality and delivery metrics
    distinguish us from our competitors.
 
    We focus on bringing our customers integrated products that have
    superior content, comfort and safety. Consistent with our
    value-added engineering focus, we place a large emphasis on the
    relationships with the engineering departments of our customers.
    These relationships not only help us to identify new business
    opportunities but also enable us to compete based on the quality
    of our products and services, rather than exclusively on price.
    In addition, we have also provided engineering solutions for
    certain specialty vehicles including, most recently, the body
    development for the prestigious Ford GT sports car.
 
    We are currently involved in the design stage of several
    products for our customers and expect to begin production of
    these products in the years 2007 to 2011.
 
    Intellectual
    Property
 
    We consider ourselves to be a leader in both product and process
    technology, and, therefore, protection of intellectual property
    is important to our business. Our principal intellectual
    property consists of product and process technology, a limited
    number of United States and foreign patents, trade secrets,
    trademarks and copyrights. Although our intellectual property is
    important to our business operations and in the aggregate
    constitutes a valuable asset, we do not believe that any single
    patent, trade secret, trademark or copyright, or group of
    patents, trade secrets, trademarks or copyrights is critical to
    the success of our business. Our policy is to seek statutory
    protection for all significant intellectual property embodied in
    patents, trademarks and copyrights. From time to time, we grant
    licenses under our patents and technology and receive licenses
    under patents and technology of others.
 
    We market our products under well-known brand names that include
    KAB Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems and Sprague
    Controls, Sprague
    Devices®,
    Prutsmantm,
    Moto
    Mirror®,
    RoadWatch®,
    Mayflower®
    and C.I.E.B. We believe that our brands are valuable and are
    increasing in value with the growth of our business, but that
    our business is not dependent on such brands. We own
    U.S. federal registrations for several of our brands.
 
    Seasonality
 
    OEMs production requirements are generally higher in the
    first three quarters of the year as compared to the fourth
    quarter. We believe this seasonality is due, in part, to demand
    for new vehicles softening during the holiday season and as a
    result of the winter months in North America and Europe. Also,
    the major North American OEM manufacturers generally close their
    production facilities at various times during the holiday season
    in the last two months of the year.
 
    Employees
 
    As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 5,790
    permanent employees, of which approximately 15.0% were salaried
    and the remainder were hourly. Approximately 52.3% of the hourly
    employees in our North American operations were unionized, and
    approximately 46.0% of our hourly employees at our United
    Kingdom operations were represented by shop steward committees.
    Employees at our Seattle, Washington facility elected to be
    represented by the International Association of Machinists and
    Aerospace Workers, certified by a representative of the National
    Labor Relations Board effective May 8, 2006. We have not
    experienced any material strikes, lockouts or work stoppages
    during 2006 and consider our relationship with our employees to
    be satisfactory. On an as needed basis during peak periods,
    contract and temporary employees are utilized.
 
    As a result of the C.I.E.B. acquisition, our total number of
    employees at December 31, 2006 increased by approximately
    225, of which approximately 27.6% were salaried and the
    remainder were hourly. None of these employees added with the
    C.I.E.B. acquisition were unionized.
    
    18
 
 
    Available
    Information
 
    We maintain a website on the Internet at www.cvgrp.com. We make
    available free of charge through our website, by way of a
    hyperlink to a third-party Securities Exchange Commission (SEC)
    filing website, our Annual Reports on
    Form 10-K,
    quarterly reports on
    Form 10-Q,
    current reports on
    Form 8-K
    and amendments to those reports electronically filed or
    furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Exchange Act of 1934. Such information is available as soon as
    such reports are filed with the SEC. Additionally, our Code of
    Ethics may be accessed within the Investor Relations section of
    our website. Information found on our website is not part of
    this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    or any other report filed with the SEC.
 
 
    You should carefully consider the risks described below before
    making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties
    described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
    and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
    deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.
 
    If any of these certain risks and uncertainties were to actually
    occur, our business, financial condition or results of
    operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case,
    the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may
    lose all or part of your investment. These risks and
    uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Volatility and cyclicality in the commercial vehicle market
    could adversely affect us. | 
 
    Our profitability depends in part on the varying conditions in
    the commercial vehicle market. This market is subject to
    considerable volatility as it moves in response to cycles in the
    overall business environment and is particularly sensitive to
    the industrial sector, which generates a significant portion of
    the freight tonnage hauled. Sales of commercial vehicles have
    historically been cyclical, with demand affected by such
    economic factors as industrial production, construction levels,
    demand for consumer durable goods, interest rates and fuel
    costs. For example, North American commercial vehicle sales and
    production experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 due to a
    confluence of events that included a weak economy, an oversupply
    of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on
    commercial vehicles and equipment. This downturn had a material
    adverse effect on our business during the same period. We cannot
    provide any assurance as to the length or ultimate level of the
    recovery of this decline. We expect that unit production of
    class 8 heavy trucks will decline in 2007 from 2006 levels.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our profitability could be adversely affected if the actual
    production volumes for our customers vehicles is
    significantly lower than expected. | 
 
    We incur costs and make capital expenditures based upon
    estimates of production volumes for our customers
    vehicles. While we attempt to establish a price of our
    components and systems that will compensate for variances in
    production volumes, if the actual production of these vehicles
    is significantly less than anticipated, our gross margin on
    these products would be adversely affected. We enter into
    agreements with our customers at the beginning of a given
    platforms life to supply products for that platform. Once
    we enter into such agreements, fulfillment of our purchasing
    requirements is our obligation for the entire production life of
    the platform, with terms ranging from five to seven years, and
    we have no provisions to terminate such contracts. We may become
    committed to supply products to our customers at selling prices
    that are not sufficient to cover the direct cost to produce such
    products. We cannot predict our customers demands for our
    products either in the aggregate or for particular reporting
    periods. If customers representing a significant amount of our
    revenues were to purchase materially lower volumes than
    expected, it would have a material adverse effect on our
    business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our major OEM customers may exert significant influence over
    us. | 
 
    The commercial vehicle component supply industry has
    traditionally been highly fragmented and serves a limited number
    of large OEMs. As a result, OEMs have historically had a
    significant amount of leverage over their outside suppliers. Our
    contracts with major OEM customers generally provide for an
    annual productivity
    
    19
 
    cost reduction. Historically, cost reductions through product
    design changes, increased productivity and similar programs with
    our suppliers have generally offset these customer-imposed
    productivity cost reduction requirements. However, if we are
    unable to generate sufficient production cost savings in the
    future to offset price reductions, our gross margin and
    profitability would be adversely affected. In addition, changes
    in OEMs purchasing policies or payment practices could
    have an adverse effect on our business.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be
    unable to successfully implement our business strategy and, as a
    result, our businesses and financial position and results of
    operations could be materially and adversely affected. | 
 
    Our ability to achieve our business and financial objectives is
    subject to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our
    control. For example, we may not be successful in implementing
    our strategy if unforeseen factors emerge that diminish the
    expected growth in the heavy truck market, or we experience
    increased pressure on our margins. In addition, we may not
    succeed in integrating strategic acquisitions and our pursuit of
    additional strategic acquisitions may lead to resource
    constraints which could have a negative impact on our ability to
    meet customers demands, thereby adversely affecting our
    relationships with those customers. As a result of such business
    or competitive factors, we may decide to alter or discontinue
    aspects of our business strategy and may adopt alternative or
    additional strategies. Any failure to successfully implement our
    business strategy could adversely affect our business, results
    of operations and growth potential.
 
    Developing product innovations has been and will continue to be
    a significant part of our business strategy. We believe that it
    is important that we continue to meet our customers
    demands for product innovation, improvement and enhancement,
    including the continued development of new-generation products,
    design improvements and innovations that improve the quality and
    efficiency of our products. However, such development will
    require us to continue to invest in research and development and
    sales and marketing. In the future, we may not have sufficient
    resources to make such necessary investments, or we may be
    unable to make the technological advances necessary to carry out
    product innovations sufficient to meet our customers
    demands. We are also subject to the risks generally associated
    with product development, including lack of market acceptance,
    delays in product development and failure of products to operate
    properly. We may, as a result of these factors, be unable to
    meaningfully focus on product innovation as a strategy and may
    therefore be unable to meet our customers demands for
    product innovation.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | If we are
    unable to obtain raw materials at favorable prices, it could
    adversely impact our results of operations and financial
    condition. | 
 
    Numerous raw materials are used in the manufacture of our
    products. Steel, aluminum, resin, foam and fabrics account for
    the most significant components of our raw material costs.
    Although we currently maintain alternative sources for raw
    materials, our business is subject to the risk of price
    increases and periodic delays in delivery. For example, we are
    currently being assessed surcharges as well as price increases
    on certain purchases of steel, copper and other raw materials.
    If we are unable to purchase certain raw materials required for
    our operations for a significant period of time, our operations
    would be disrupted, and our results of operations would be
    adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to pass on the
    increased costs of raw materials to our customers, this could
    adversely affect our results of operations and financial
    condition. Our operating results for the years ended
    December 31, 2006 and 2005 were adversely affected by the
    costs on certain of our purchases of steel, petroleum and copper
    costs.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be
    unable to complete additional strategic acquisitions or we may
    encounter unforeseen difficulties in integrating
    acquisitions. | 
 
    The commercial vehicle component supply industry is beginning to
    undergo consolidation as OEMs seek to reduce costs and their
    supplier base. We intend to actively pursue additional
    acquisition targets that will allow us to continue to expand
    into new geographic markets, add new customers, provide new
    product, manufacturing and service capabilities and increase
    penetration with existing customers. However, we expect to face
    competition for acquisition candidates, which may limit the
    number of our acquisition opportunities and may lead to higher
    acquisition prices. Moreover, acquisitions of businesses may
    require additional debt
    
    20
 
    financing, resulting in additional leverage. The covenants of
    our senior credit facility may further limit our ability to
    complete acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will
    find attractive acquisition candidates or successfully integrate
    acquired businesses into our existing business. If we fail to
    complete additional acquisitions, we may have difficulty
    competing with more thoroughly integrated competitors and our
    results of operations could be adversely affected. To the extent
    that we do complete additional acquisitions, if the expected
    synergies from such acquisitions do not materialize or we fail
    to successfully integrate such new businesses into our existing
    businesses, our results of operations could also be adversely
    affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be adversely impacted by labor strikes, work stoppages
    and other matters. | 
 
    The hourly workforces at our Norwalk and Shadyside, Ohio and
    Seattle, Washington facilities and Mexico operations are
    unionized. The unionized employees at these facilities
    represented approximately 52.3% of our total hourly employees in
    our North American operations as of December 31, 2006.
    Employees at our Seattle, Washington facility elected to be
    represented by the International Association of Machinists and
    Aerospace Workers, certified by a representative of the National
    Labor Relations Board effective May 8, 2006. We have
    experienced limited unionization efforts at certain of our other
    North American facilities from time to time. In addition, a
    significant portion of our employees at our United Kingdom
    operations are represented by a shop steward committee, which
    may seek to limit our flexibility in our relationship with these
    employees. We cannot assure you that we will not encounter
    future unionization efforts or other types of conflicts with
    labor unions or our employees.
 
    Many of our OEM customers and their suppliers also have
    unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slow-downs experienced
    by OEMs or their other suppliers could result in slow-downs or
    closures of assembly plants where our products are included in
    assembled commercial vehicles. In the event that one or more of
    our customers or their suppliers experience a material work
    stoppage, such work stoppage could have a material adverse
    effect on our business.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our businesses are subject to statutory environmental and
    safety regulations in multiple jurisdictions, and the impact of
    any changes in regulation
    and/or the
    violation of any applicable laws and regulations by our
    businesses could result in a material and adverse affect on our
    financial condition and results of operations. | 
 
    We are subject to foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
    regulations governing the protection of the environment and
    occupational health and safety, including laws regulating air
    emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, storage,
    handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials; the
    emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the soil,
    ground or air; and the health and safety of our colleagues. We
    are also required to obtain permits from governmental
    authorities for certain of our operations. We cannot assure you
    that we are, or have been, in complete compliance with such
    environment and safety laws, regulations and permits. If we
    violate or fail to comply with these laws, regulations or
    permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by
    regulators. In some instances, such a fine or sanction could
    have a material adverse effect on us. The environmental laws to
    which we are subject have become more stringent over time, and
    we could incur material expenses in the future to comply with
    environmental laws. We are also subject to laws imposing
    liability for the cleanup of contaminated property. Under these
    laws, we could be held liable for costs and damages relating to
    contamination at our past or present facilities and at third
    party sites to which we sent waste containing hazardous
    substances. The amount of such liability could be material.
 
    Several of our facilities are either certified as, or are in the
    process of being certified as ISO 9001, 14000, 14001 or TS16949
    (the international environmental management standard) compliant
    or are developing similar environmental management systems.
    Although we have made, and will continue to make, capital
    expenditures to implement such environmental programs and comply
    with environmental requirements, we do not expect to make
    material capital expenditures for environmental controls in 2007
    or 2008. The environmental laws to which we are subject have
    become more stringent over time, however, and we could incur
    material costs or expenses in the future to comply with
    environmental laws. Certain of our operations generate hazardous
    substances and wastes. If a release of such substances or wastes
    occurs at or from our properties, or at or from any offsite
    disposal location to which substances or wastes from our current
    or former operations were taken,
    
    21
 
    or if contamination is discovered at any of our current or
    former properties, we may be held liable for the costs of
    cleanup and for any other response by governmental authorities
    or private parties, together with any associated fines,
    penalties or damages. In most jurisdictions, this liability
    would arise whether or not we had complied with environmental
    laws governing the handling of hazardous substances or wastes.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be adversely affected by the impact of government
    regulations on our OEM customers. | 
 
    Although the products we manufacture and supply to commercial
    vehicle OEMs are not subject to significant government
    regulation, our business is indirectly impacted by the extensive
    governmental regulation applicable to commercial vehicle OEMs.
    These regulations primarily relate to emissions and noise
    standards imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, state
    regulatory agencies, such as the California Air Resources Board
    (CARB), and other regulatory agencies around the
    world. Commercial vehicle OEMs are also subject to the National
    Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act and Federal Motor Vehicle
    Safety Standards promulgated by the National Highway Traffic
    Safety Administration. Changes in emission standards and other
    proposed governmental regulations could impact the demand for
    commercial vehicles and, as a result, indirectly impact our
    operations. For example, new emission standards governing
    Heavy-duty (Class 8) diesel engines that went into
    effect in the United States on October 1, 2002 resulted in
    significant purchases of new trucks by fleet operators prior to
    such date and reduced short term demand for such trucks in
    periods immediately following such date. New emission standards
    for truck engines used in Class 5 to 8 trucks imposed by
    the EPA and CARB are scheduled to become effective in 2007. To
    the extent that current or future governmental regulation has a
    negative impact on the demand for commercial vehicles, our
    business, financial condition or results of operations could be
    adversely affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our customer base is concentrated and the loss of business
    from a major customer or the discontinuation of particular
    commercial vehicle platforms could reduce our revenues. | 
 
    Sales to International, PACCAR, Freightliner and Volvo/Mack
    accounted for approximately 22%, 17%, 13% and 13%, respectively,
    of our revenue in 2006, and our ten largest customers accounted
    for approximately 82% of our revenue in 2006. The loss of any of
    our largest customers or the loss of significant business from
    any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on
    our business, financial condition and results of operations.
    Even though we may be selected as the supplier of a product by
    an OEM for a particular vehicle, our OEM customers issue blanket
    purchase orders which generally provide for the supply of that
    customers annual requirements for that vehicle, rather
    than for a specific number of our products. If the OEMs
    requirements are less than estimated, the number of products we
    sell to that OEM will be accordingly reduced. In addition, the
    OEM may terminate its purchase orders with us at any time.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse
    effect on our revenues and results of operations. | 
 
    We have operations in Europe, Australia, Mexico and China, and
    sales derived from these operations were approximately 13% of
    our revenues in 2006. As a result, we generate a significant
    portion of our sales and incur a significant portion of our
    expenses in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. To the
    extent that we are unable to match revenues received in foreign
    currencies with costs paid in the same currency, exchange rate
    fluctuations in any such currency could have an adverse effect
    on our financial results. During times of a strengthening
    U.S. dollar, our reported revenues and earnings from our
    international operations will be reduced because the applicable
    local currencies will be translated into fewer
    U.S. dollars. The converse is also true and the
    strengthening of the European currencies in relation to the
    U.S. dollar can have a positive impact on our foreign
    revenues and earnings.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We are subject to certain risks associated with our foreign
    operations. | 
 
    We have operations in Europe, Australia, Mexico and China. Our
    international operations accounted for approximately 13%, 16%
    and 28% of our total revenues for the years ended
    December 31, 2006, 2005 and
    
    22
 
    2004, respectively. There are certain risks inherent in our
    international business activities including, but not limited to:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting
    receivables through certain foreign legal systems; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | foreign customers, who may have longer payment cycles than
    customers in the United States; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | tax rates in certain foreign countries, which may exceed those
    in the United States and foreign earnings may be subject to
    withholding requirements or the imposition of tariffs, exchange
    controls or other restrictions, including restrictions on
    repatriation; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | intellectual property protection difficulties; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | general economic and political conditions in countries where we
    operate, which may have an adverse effect on our operations in
    those countries; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the difficulties associated with managing a large organization
    spread throughout various countries; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | complications in complying with a variety of foreign laws and
    regulations, which may conflict with United States law. | 
 
    As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will
    be dependent, in part, on our ability to anticipate and
    effectively manage these and other risks associated with foreign
    operations. We cannot assure you that these and other factors
    will not have a material adverse effect on our international
    operations or our business, financial condition or results of
    operations as a whole.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our
    inability to compete effectively in the highly competitive
    commercial vehicle component supply industry could result in
    lower prices for our products, reduced gross margins and loss of
    market share, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues
    and operating results. | 
 
    The commercial vehicle component supply industry is highly
    competitive. Our products primarily compete on the basis of
    price, breadth of product offerings, product quality, technical
    expertise and development capability, product delivery and
    product service. Increased competition may lead to price
    reductions resulting in reduced gross margins and loss of market
    share.
 
    Current and future competitors may make strategic acquisitions
    or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
    others, foresee the course of market development more accurately
    than we do, develop products that are superior to our products,
    produce similar products at lower cost than we can or adapt more
    quickly to new technologies, industry or customer requirements.
    By doing so, they may enhance their ability to meet the needs of
    our customers or potential future customers. These developments
    could limit our ability to obtain revenues from new customers
    and to maintain existing revenues from our customer base. We may
    not be able to compete successfully against current and future
    competitors and the failure to do so may have a material adverse
    effect on our business, operating results and financial
    condition.
 
    
    Our products may be rendered less attractive by changes in
    competitive technologies.
 
    Changes in competitive technologies may render certain of our
    products less attractive. Our ability to anticipate changes in
    technology and to successfully develop and introduce new and
    enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor
    in our ability to remain competitive. There can be no assurance
    that we will be able to achieve the technological advances that
    may be necessary for us to remain competitive. We are also
    subject to the risks generally associated with new product
    introductions and applications, including lack of market
    acceptance, delays in product development and failure to operate
    properly.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | If we are
    unable to recruit or retain skilled personnel, or if we lose the
    services of any of our key management personnel, our business,
    operating results and financial condition could be materially
    adversely affected. | 
 
    Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract,
    train, integrate and retain highly skilled personnel.
    Competition for these employees is intense. We may not be able
    to retain our current key
    
    23
 
    employees or attract, train, integrate or retain other highly
    skilled personnel in the future. Our future success also depends
    in large part on the continued service of key management
    personnel, particularly our key executive officers. If we lose
    the services of one or more of these individuals or other key
    personnel, or if we are unable to attract, train, integrate and
    retain the highly skilled personnel we need, our business,
    operating results and financial condition could be materially
    adversely affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We have
    only limited protection for our proprietary rights in our
    intellectual property, which makes it difficult to prevent third
    parties from infringing upon our rights. | 
 
    Our success depends to a certain degree on our ability to
    protect our intellectual property and to operate without
    infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. While we
    have been issued patents and have registered trademarks with
    respect to many of our products, our competitors could
    independently develop similar or superior products or
    technologies, duplicate our designs, trademarks, processes or
    other intellectual property or design around any processes or
    designs on which we have or may obtain patents or trademark
    protection. In addition, it is possible that third parties may
    have or acquire licenses for other technology or designs that we
    may use or desire to use, so that we may need to acquire
    licenses to, or to contest the validity of, such patents or
    trademarks of third parties. Such licenses may not be made
    available to us on acceptable terms, if at all, and we may not
    prevail in contesting the validity of third party rights.
 
    In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also protect
    trade secrets, know-how and other confidential information
    against unauthorized use by others or disclosure by persons who
    have access to them, such as our employees, through contractual
    arrangements. These arrangements may not provide meaningful
    protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary
    information in the event of any unauthorized use,
    misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how
    or other proprietary information. If we are unable to maintain
    the proprietary nature of our technologies, our revenues could
    be materially adversely affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our
    products may be susceptible to claims by third parties that our
    products infringe upon their proprietary rights. | 
 
    As the number of products in our target markets increases and
    the functionality of these products further overlaps, we may
    become increasingly subject to claims by a third party that our
    technology infringes such partys proprietary rights.
    Regardless of their merit, any such claims could be time
    consuming and expensive to defend, may divert managements
    attention and resources, could cause product shipment delays and
    could require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing
    agreements. If successful, a claim of infringement against us
    and our inability to license the infringed or similar technology
    and/or
    product could have a material adverse effect on our business,
    operating results and financial condition.
 
    
    The market price of our common stock may be extremely
    volatile.
 
    Our stock price has fluctuated since our initial public offering
    in August 2004. The trading price of our common stock is subject
    to significant fluctuations in response to variations in
    quarterly operating results, the gain or loss of significant
    orders, changes in earnings estimates by analysts, announcements
    of technological innovations or new products by us or our
    competitors, general conditions in the commercial vehicle
    industry and other events or factors. In addition, the equity
    markets in general have experienced extreme price and volume
    fluctuations which have affected the market price for many
    companies in industries similar or related to that of ours and
    which have been unrelated to the operating performance of these
    companies. These market fluctuations may have affected and may
    continue to affect the market price of our common stock.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our
    operating results, revenues and expenses may fluctuate
    significantly from
    quarter-to-quarter
    or
    year-to-year,
    which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our
    stock. | 
 
    For a number of reasons, including but not limited to, those
    described below, our operating results, revenues and expenses
    have in the past varied and may in the future vary significantly
    from
    quarter-to-quarter
    or
    year-to-year.
    These fluctuations could have an adverse effect on the market
    price of our common stock.
    
    24
 
 
    Fluctuations in Quarterly or Annual Operating
    Results.  Our quarterly operating results may
    fluctuate as a result of:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | the size, timing, volume and execution of significant orders and
    shipments; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in the terms of our sales contracts; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the timing of new product announcements; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | market acceptance of new and enhanced products; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the length of our sales cycles; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in our operating expenses; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | personnel changes; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | new business acquisitions; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in foreign currency exchange rates; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | seasonal factors. | 
 
    Limited Ability to Adjust Expenses.  We base
    our operating expense budgets primarily on expected revenue
    trends. Many of our expenses are relatively fixed and as such we
    may be unable to adjust expenses quickly enough to offset any
    unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any shortfall in
    revenue may cause significant variation in operating results in
    any quarter.
 
    Based on the above factors, we believe that
    quarter-to-quarter
    or
    year-to-year
    comparisons of our operating results may not be a good
    indication of our future performance. It is possible that in one
    or more future quarters or years, our operating results may be
    below the expectations of public market analysts and investors.
    In that event, the trading price of our common stock may be
    adversely affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be
    subject to product liability claims, recalls or warranty claims,
    which could be expensive, damage our reputation and result in a
    diversion of management resources. | 
 
    As a supplier of products and systems to commercial vehicle
    OEMs, we face an inherent business risk of exposure to product
    liability claims in the event that our products, or the
    equipment into which our products are incorporated, malfunction
    and result in personal injury or death. Product liability claims
    could result in significant losses as a result of expenses
    incurred in defending claims or the award of damages.
 
    In addition, we may be required to participate in recalls
    involving systems or components sold by us if any prove to be
    defective, or we may voluntarily initiate a recall or make
    payments related to such claims as a result of various industry
    or business practices or the need to maintain good customer
    relationships. Such a recall would result in a diversion of
    management resources. While we do maintain product liability
    insurance, we cannot assure you that it will be sufficient to
    cover all product liability claims, that such claims will not
    exceed our insurance coverage limits or that such insurance will
    continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at
    all. Any product liability claim brought against us could have a
    material adverse effect on our results of operations.
 
    Moreover, we warrant the workmanship and materials of many of
    our products under limited warranties and have entered into
    warranty agreements with certain OEMs that warranty certain of
    our products in the hands of these OEMs customers, in some
    cases for as long as six years. Accordingly, we are subject to
    risk of warranty claims in the event that our products do not
    conform to our customers specifications or, in some cases
    in the event that our products do not conform with their
    customers expectations. It is possible for warranty claims
    to result in costly product recalls, significant repair costs
    and damage to our reputation, all of which would adversely
    affect our results of operations.
    
    25
 
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Equipment
    failures, delays in deliveries or catastrophic loss at any of
    our facilities could lead to production or service curtailments
    or shutdowns. | 
 
    We manufacture or assemble our products at facilities in North
    America, Europe, China and Australia. An interruption in
    production or service capabilities at any of these facilities as
    a result of equipment failure or other reasons could result in
    our inability to produce our products, which could reduce our
    net revenues and earnings for the affected period. In the event
    of a stoppage in production at any of our facilities, even if
    only temporary, or if we experience delays as a result of events
    that are beyond our control, delivery times to our customers
    could be severely affected. Any significant delay in deliveries
    to our customers could lead to increased returns or
    cancellations and cause us to lose future revenues. Our
    facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due
    to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent
    weather conditions. We may experience plant shutdowns or periods
    of reduced production as a result of equipment failure, delays
    in deliveries or catastrophic loss, which could have a material
    adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
    financial condition.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our
    indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and
    make it more difficult to implement our business
    strategy. | 
 
    The aggregate amount of our outstanding indebtedness was
    $162.1 million as of December 31, 2006. Our
    substantial level of indebtedness increases the possibility that
    we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay, when due,
    the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of
    our indebtedness, including the notes. Our substantial
    indebtedness, combined with our lease and other financial
    obligations and contractual commitments could have other
    important consequences to you as a holder of the notes. For
    example, it could:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
    respect to our indebtedness, including the notes, and any
    failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt
    instruments, including financial and other restrictive
    covenants, could result in an event of default under the
    indenture governing the notes and the agreements governing such
    other indebtedness; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic,
    industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in
    government regulation; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
    from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
    reducing the availability of our cash flows to fund working
    capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
    corporate purposes; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
    in our business and the industry in which we operate; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
    competitors that have less debt; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working
    capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service
    requirements, execution of our business strategy or other
    purposes. | 
 
    Any of the above listed factors could materially adversely
    affect our business, financial condition and results of
    operations.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | The terms
    of our senior credit facility and the indenture governing the
    8.0% senior notes due 2013 may restrict our current and
    future operations, particularly our ability to respond to
    changes in our business or to take certain actions. | 
 
    Our senior credit facility and the indenture governing the
    8.0% senior notes due 2013 contain covenants that, among
    other things, restricts our ability to:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | incur liens; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | incur or assume additional debt or guarantees or issue preferred
    stock; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | pay dividends, or make redemptions and repurchases, with respect
    to capital stock; | 
    
    26
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | prepay, or make redemptions and repurchases of, subordinated
    debt; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | make loans and investments; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | make capital expenditures; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | engage in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, sale/leaseback
    transactions and transactions with affiliates; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | change the business conducted by us or our subsidiaries; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | amend the terms of subordinated debt. | 
 
    Also, our senior credit facility requires us to maintain
    compliance with specified financial ratios and satisfy certain
    financial condition tests (some of which become more restrictive
    over time). If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
    such ratios, our lenders could declare a default under the
    senior credit facility, and our indebtedness could be declared
    immediately due and payable. Our ability to comply with the
    provisions of the senior credit facility may be affected by
    changes in economic or business conditions beyond our control.
    In addition, these covenants could affect our ability to operate
    our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of
    potential business opportunities as they arise.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our
    inability to successfully execute any planned cost reductions,
    restructuring initiatives or the achievement of operational
    efficiencies could result in the incurrence of additional costs
    and expenses that could adversely affect our reported
    earnings. | 
 
    As part of our business strategy, we continuously seek ways to
    lower costs, improve manufacturing efficiencies and increase
    productivity and intend to apply this strategy to those
    operations acquired through acquisitions. In this regard, we may
    incur restructuring charges in the future and such charges could
    adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our
    earnings may be adversely affected by changes to the carrying
    values of our tangible and intangible assets, including
    goodwill, as a result of recording any impairment charges deemed
    necessary in conjunction with the execution of our periodic
    asset impairment assessment and testing policy. | 
 
    At December 31, 2006, we had goodwill of approximately
    $134.8 million and other intangible assets of approximately
    $84.2 million. We may identify additional anticipated or
    unanticipated impairments in any of our tangible or intangible
    asset categories in future testing periods and be required to
    record charges against earnings in the period in which the
    impairment is identified. Specific indicators that give rise to
    asset impairment may include, but are not limited to, changes in
    the general economic environment, changes or downturns in our
    industry as a whole, termination of any of our customer
    contracts, restructuring efforts and general workforce
    reductions among other factors.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 1B. | Unresolved
    Staff Comments | 
 
    None.
 
 
    Our corporate office is located in New Albany, Ohio. Several of
    our manufacturing facilities are located near our OEM customers
    to reduce our distribution costs, reduce risk of interruptions
    in our delivery schedule,
    
    27
 
    further improve customer service and provide our customers with
    reliable delivery of products and services. The following table
    provides selected information regarding our principal facilities:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Approximate 
 |  |  | 
| 
    Location
 |  | 
    Products Produced
 |  | 
    Square Footage
 |  | 
    Ownership Interest
 | 
|  | 
| 
    Norwalk, Ohio (3 facilities)
    
 |  | Cab, Sleeper Box, Assembly and
    Ford GT Service |  | 360,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned/Leased | 
| 
    Vonore, Tennessee (2 facilities)
    
 |  | Seats, Mirrors |  | 245,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned/Leased | 
| 
    Shadyside, Ohio
    
 |  | Stamping of Steel and Aluminum
    Structural and Exposed Stamped Components |  | 200,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Northampton, England
    
 |  | Seats (office and commercial
    vehicle) |  | 210,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Kings Mountain, North Carolina
    
 |  | Cab, Sleeper Box, Assembly |  | 180,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Statesville, North Carolina
    (2 facilities)
    
 |  | Interior Trim, Seats |  | 163,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Seattle, Washington
    
 |  | RIM Process, Interior Trim, Seats |  | 156,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Michigan City, Indiana
    
 |  | Wipers, Switches |  | 87,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Canby, Oregon
    
 |  | Road watch/Electronics Assembly |  | 4,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Dublin, Virginia
    
 |  | Interior Trim, Seats |  | 79,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Vancouver, Washington
    (2 facilities)
    
 |  | Interior Trim |  | 63,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Chillicothe, Ohio
    
 |  | Interior Trim, Dash Assembly |  | 62,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Shanghai, China (2 facilities)
    
 |  | Seats |  | 74,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Bellaire, Ohio
    
 |  | Warehouse Facility |  | 41,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Tacoma, Washington
    
 |  | Injection Molding |  | 25,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Plain City, Ohio
    
 |  | R&D, Lab |  | 8,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Seneffs (Brussels), Belgium
    
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 35,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Brisbane (HQ), Australia
    
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 50,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Dublin, Ohio
    
 |  | Administration |  | 14,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Agua Prieta, Mexico
    (4 facilities)
    
 |  | Wire Harness Assembly |  | 150,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Douglas, Arizona
    (2 facilities)
    
 |  | Warehouse Facility |  | 21,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Monona, Iowa
    
 |  | Wire Harness/Panel Assembly |  | 62,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Edgewood, Iowa
    
 |  | Wire Harness/Assembly |  | 18,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Redgranite, Wisconsin
    
 |  | Wire Harness Engineering Support |  | 2,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Dekalb, Illinois
    
 |  | Cab Assembly |  | 60,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Gahanna, Ohio
    
 |  | R&D, Lab |  | 29,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Concord, North Carolina
    (2 facilities)
    
 |  | Injection Molding |  | 150,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    New Albany, Ohio
    
 |  | Corporate Headquarters |  | 16,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Brandys nad Orlici, Czech Republic
    
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 52,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
 
    We also have leased sales and service offices located in
    Australia, France and Czech Republic.
 
    Utilization of our facilities varies with North American and
    European commercial vehicle production and general economic
    conditions in such regions. All locations are principally used
    for manufacturing or assembly, except for our New Albany and
    Dublin, Ohio facilities which are corporate and administrative
    offices, our
    
    28
 
    Plain City and Gahanna, Ohio, Wixom, Michigan and Redgranite,
    Wisconsin research and development and engineering facilities
    and our leased warehouse facilities in Douglas, Arizona and
    Bellaire and Norwalk, Ohio.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 3. | Legal
    Proceedings | 
 
    We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising
    in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited
    to, customer and supplier disputes and product liability claims
    arising out of the conduct of our businesses and examinations by
    the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS
    routinely examines our federal income tax returns and, in the
    course of those examinations, the IRS may propose adjustments to
    our federal income tax liability reported on such returns. It is
    our practice to defend those proposed adjustments that we deem
    lacking merit. We are not involved in any litigation at this
    time in which we expect that an unfavorable outcome of the
    proceedings, including any proposed adjustments presented to
    date by the IRS, individually or collectively, will have a
    material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
    operations or cash flows.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 4. | Submission
    of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 
 
    There were no matters submitted to a vote of stockholders during
    the fourth quarter of 2006.
 
    PART II
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 5. | Market
    for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
    and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 
 
    Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
    under the symbol CVGI. The following table sets
    forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock, for the
    periods indicated as regularly reported by the Nasdaq Global
    Select Market:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | High |  |  | Low |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Year Ended December 31, 2006:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fourth Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 23.57 |  |  | $ | 18.47 |  | 
| 
    Third Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 21.08 |  |  | $ | 17.19 |  | 
| 
    Second Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 21.25 |  |  | $ | 17.82 |  | 
| 
    First Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 22.29 |  |  | $ | 17.10 |  | 
| 
    Year Ended December 31, 2005:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fourth Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 21.11 |  |  | $ | 17.30 |  | 
| 
    Third Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 24.94 |  |  | $ | 17.70 |  | 
| 
    Second Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 21.74 |  |  | $ | 16.51 |  | 
| 
    First Quarter
    
 |  | $ | 24.38 |  |  | $ | 18.25 |  | 
 
    As of February 28, 2007, there were 128 holders of record
    of our outstanding common stock.
 
    We have not declared or paid any dividends to the holders of our
    common stock in the past and do not anticipate paying dividends
    in the foreseeable future. Any future payment of dividends is
    within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend
    upon, among other factors, the capital requirements, operating
    results and financial condition of CVG. In addition, our ability
    to pay cash dividends is limited under the terms of the credit
    agreement governing our senior credit facility.
    
    29
 
 
    The graph below matches Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.s
    cumulative
    28-month
    total stockholder return on common stock with the cumulative
    total returns of the NASDAQ Composite Index, the Commercial
    Vehicle OEM Composite Index and the Commercial Vehicle Supplier
    Composite Index. The Commercial Vehicle OEM Composite Index
    includes four companies: Navistar International Corp., PACCAR
    Inc., Volvo AB and Wabash National Corp. The Commercial Vehicle
    Supplier Composite Index includes five companies: Accuride
    Corporation, ArvinMeritor, Inc., Cummins, Inc., Eaton Corp. and
    Modine Manufacturing Co. The graph tracks the performance of a
    $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the
    reinvestment of all dividends) from August 5, 2004 to
    December 31, 2006.
 
    COMPARISON
    OF 28 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
    Among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index,
    Commercial Vehicle OEM Composite Index and Commercial Vehicle
    Supplier Composite Index
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | * | $100 invested on 8/5/04 in stock or on 7/31/04 in
    index-including reinvestment of dividends. | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 08/05/04 |  |  | 12/31/04 |  |  | 12/31/05 |  |  | 12/31/06 | 
| 
    Commercial Vehicle Group,
    Inc. 
    
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 166.64 |  |  |  | $ | 143.36 |  |  |  | $ | 166.41 |  | 
| 
    NASDAQ Composite
    
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 118.75 |  |  |  | $ | 119.46 |  |  |  | $ | 129.61 |  | 
| 
    Commercial Vehicle OEM Composite
    
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 103.78 |  |  |  | $ | 141.62 |  |  |  | $ | 188.02 |  | 
| 
    Commercial Vehicle Supplier
    Composite
    
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 116.42 |  |  |  | $ | 111.04 |  |  |  | $ | 129.90 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The information in the graph and table above is not
    soliciting material, is not deemed filed
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
    incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the
    Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date
    of this annual report, except to the extent that we specifically
    incorporate such information by reference.
    
    30
 
 
    The following table sets forth information in connection with
    purchases made by, or on behalf of, us or any affiliated
    purchaser, of shares of our common stock during the quarterly
    period ended December 31, 2006:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (d) Maximum 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (c) Total 
 |  |  | Number (or 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Approximate 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Shares (or 
 |  |  | Dollar Value) 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Units) 
 |  |  | of Shares (or 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Purchased 
 |  |  | Units) that 
 |  | 
|  |  | (a) Total 
 |  |  |  |  |  | as Part of 
 |  |  | May Yet Be 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | (b) Average 
 |  |  | Publicly 
 |  |  | Purchased 
 |  | 
|  |  | Shares (or 
 |  |  | Price Paid 
 |  |  | Announced 
 |  |  | Under the 
 |  | 
|  |  | Units) 
 |  |  | per Share 
 |  |  | Plans or 
 |  |  | Plans or 
 |  | 
|  |  | Purchased |  |  | (or Unit) |  |  | Programs |  |  | Programs |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Month #1
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| (October 1, 2006 through October 31, 2006)
 |  |  | 5,836 |  |  | $ | 19.67 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Month #2
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| (November 1, 2006 through November 30, 2006)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Month #3
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| (December 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    We did not repurchase any of our common stock on the open market
    as part of a stock repurchase program during the fourth quarter
    of 2006, however, our employees surrendered 5,836 shares of
    our common stock to satisfy the tax withholding obligations on
    the vesting of restricted stock awards issued under our Amended
    and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
    
    31
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 6. | Selected
    Financial Data | 
 
    The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
    data regarding our business and certain industry information and
    should be read in conjunction with Managements
    Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
    Operations, and our consolidated financial statements and
    notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
 
    Material
    Events Affecting Financial Statement Comparability:
 
    Collectively, our acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona, Cabarrus
    and C.I.E.B. materially impacted our results of operations and
    as a result, our consolidated financial statements for the years
    ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are not comparable to the
    results of the prior periods presented without consideration of
    the information provided in Note 3 and Note 7 to our
    consolidated financial statements contained in Item 15 of
    our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2005, and Note 3 and
    Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements contained
    in Item 8 of our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2003 |  |  | 2002 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Statement of Operations
    Data:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Revenues
    
 |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  |  | $ | 380,445 |  |  | $ | 287,579 |  |  | $ | 298,678 |  | 
| 
    Cost of revenues
    
 |  |  | 768,913 |  |  |  | 620,031 |  |  |  | 309,696 |  |  |  | 237,884 |  |  |  | 249,181 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross profit
    
 |  |  | 149,838 |  |  |  | 134,450 |  |  |  | 70,749 |  |  |  | 49,695 |  |  |  | 49,497 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and
    administrative expenses
    
 |  |  | 51,950 |  |  |  | 44,564 |  |  |  | 28,985 |  |  |  | 24,281 |  |  |  | 23,952 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,125 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization expense
    
 |  |  | 414 |  |  |  | 358 |  |  |  | 107 |  |  |  | 185 |  |  |  | 122 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating income
    
 |  |  | 97,474 |  |  |  | 89,528 |  |  |  | 31,532 |  |  |  | 25,229 |  |  |  | 25,423 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on foreign currency
    forward contracts and other
    
 |  |  | (3,468 | ) |  |  | (3,741 | ) |  |  | (1,247 | ) |  |  | 3,230 |  |  |  | 1,098 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense
    
 |  |  | 14,829 |  |  |  | 13,195 |  |  |  | 7,244 |  |  |  | 9,796 |  |  |  | 12,940 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of
    debt
    
 |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | 1,605 |  |  |  | 2,972 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income before income taxes and
    cumulative effect of accounting change
    
 |  |  | 85,795 |  |  |  | 78,549 |  |  |  | 23,930 |  |  |  | 9,231 |  |  |  | 11,385 |  | 
| 
    Provision for income taxes
    
 |  |  | 27,745 |  |  |  | 29,138 |  |  |  | 6,481 |  |  |  | 5,267 |  |  |  | 5,235 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income before cumulative effect of
    change in accounting principle
    
 |  |  | 58,050 |  |  |  | 49,411 |  |  |  | 17,449 |  |  |  | 3,964 |  |  |  | 6,150 |  | 
| 
    Cumulative effect of change in
    accounting principle
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (51,630 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
    
 |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  |  | $ | 3,964 |  |  | $ | (45,480 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Earnings (loss) per share:(1)
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
    
 |  | $ | 2.74 |  |  | $ | 2.54 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |  |  | $ | 0.29 |  |  | $ | (3.29 | ) | 
| 
    Diluted
    
 |  | $ | 2.69 |  |  | $ | 2.51 |  |  | $ | 1.12 |  |  | $ | 0.29 |  |  | $ | (3.26 | ) | 
| 
    Weighted average common shares
    outstanding:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
    
 |  |  | 21,151 |  |  |  | 19,440 |  |  |  | 15,429 |  |  |  | 13,779 |  |  |  | 13,827 |  | 
| 
    Diluted
    
 |  |  | 21,545 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 15,623 |  |  |  | 13,883 |  |  |  | 13,931 |  | 
    
    32
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2003 |  |  | 2002 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance Sheet Data (at end of
    each period):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Working capital (current assets
    less current liabilities)
    
 |  |  | 135,368 |  |  |  | 119,104 |  |  |  | 41,727 |  |  |  | 28,216 |  |  |  | 8,809 |  | 
| 
    Total assets
    
 |  |  | 590,822 |  |  |  | 543,883 |  |  |  | 225,638 |  |  |  | 210,495 |  |  |  | 204,217 |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities, excluding debt
    
 |  |  | 163,803 |  |  |  | 150,797 |  |  |  | 60,667 |  |  |  | 48,215 |  |  |  | 49,990 |  | 
| 
    Total debt
    
 |  |  | 162,114 |  |  |  | 191,009 |  |  |  | 53,925 |  |  |  | 127,474 |  |  |  | 127,202 |  | 
| 
    Total stockholders investment
    
 |  |  | 264,905 |  |  |  | 202,077 |  |  |  | 111,046 |  |  |  | 34,806 |  |  |  | 27,025 |  | 
| 
    Other Data:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjusted EBITDA(2)
    
 |  | $ | 115,910 |  |  | $ | 105,385 |  |  | $ | 40,389 |  |  | $ | 30,105 |  |  | $ | 33,007 |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in):
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating activities
    
 |  |  | 36,922 |  |  |  | 44,156 |  |  |  | 34,177 |  |  |  | 10,442 |  |  |  | 18,172 |  | 
| 
    Investing activities
    
 |  |  | (27,625 | ) |  |  | (188,569 | ) |  |  | (8,907 | ) |  |  | (5,967 | ) |  |  | (4,937 | ) | 
| 
    Financing activities
    
 |  |  | (27,952 | ) |  |  | 188,547 |  |  |  | (28,427 | ) |  |  | (2,761 | ) |  |  | (14,825 | ) | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
    
 |  |  | 14,983 |  |  |  | 12,064 |  |  |  | 7,567 |  |  |  | 8,106 |  |  |  | 8,682 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures, net
    
 |  |  | 22,389 |  |  |  | 20,669 |  |  |  | 8,907 |  |  |  | 5,967 |  |  |  | 4,937 |  | 
| 
    North American Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) truck production (units)(3)
    
 |  |  | 378,000 |  |  |  | 341,000 |  |  |  | 269,000 |  |  |  | 182,000 |  |  |  | 181,000 |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (1) |  | Earnings (loss) per share has been calculated giving effect to
    the reclassification of our outstanding classes of common stock
    into one class of common stock and, in connection therewith, a
    38.991-to-one
    stock split. | 
|  | 
    | (2) |  | Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is
    reconciled to net income, its most directly comparable GAAP
    measure, in the accompanying financial tables. Adjusted EBITDA
    is defined as net earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
    amortization, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt,
    miscellaneous income/expenses and cumulative effect of changes
    in accounting principle. In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, we
    exclude the effects of gains/losses on the early extinguishment
    of debt, miscellaneous income/expenses and cumulative effect of
    changes in accounting principles because our management believes
    that some of these items may not occur in certain periods, the
    amounts recognized can vary significantly from period to period
    and these items do not facilitate an understanding of our
    operating performance. Our management utilizes Adjusted EBITDA,
    in addition to the supplemental information, as an operating
    performance measure in conjunction with GAAP measures, such as
    net income and gross margin calculated in conformity with GAAP. | 
 
    Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the
    supplemental information, as an integral part of its report and
    planning processes and as one of the primary measures to, among
    other things:
 
    (i) monitor and evaluate the performance of our business
    operations;
 
    (ii) facilitate managements internal comparisons of
    our historical operating performance of our business operations;
 
    (iii) facilitate managements external comparisons of
    the results of our overall business to the historical operating
    performance of other companies that may have different capital
    structures and debt levels;
 
    (iv) review and assess the operating performance of our
    management team and as a measure in evaluating employee
    compensation and bonuses;
 
    (v) analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning
    decisions regarding future operating investments; and
    33
 
 
    (vi) plan for and prepare future annual operating budgets
    and determine appropriate levels of operating investments.
 
    Our management believes that Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the
    supplemental information, is useful to investors as it provides
    them with disclosures of our operating results on the same basis
    as that used by our management. Additionally, our management
    believes that Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the supplemental
    information, provides useful information to investors about the
    performance of our overall business because the measure
    eliminates the effects of certain recurring and other unusual or
    infrequent charges that are not directly attributable to our
    underlying operating performance. Additionally, our management
    believes that because we have historically provided a non-GAAP
    financial measure in previous filings, that continuing to
    include a non-GAAP measure in our filings provides consistency
    in our financial reporting and continuity to investors for
    comparability purposes. Accordingly, we believe that the
    presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when used in conjunction with
    the supplemental information and GAAP financial measures, is a
    useful financial analysis tool, used by our management as
    described above, that can assist investors in assessing our
    financial condition, operating performance and underlying
    strength. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation
    or as a substitute for net income prepared in conformity with
    GAAP. Other companies may define Adjusted EBITDA differently.
    Adjusted EBITDA, as well as the other information in this
    filing, should be read in conjunction with our financial
    statements and footnotes contained in the documents that we file
    with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
    The following is a reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted
    EBITDA:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2003 |  |  | 2002 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
    
 |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  |  | $ | 3,964 |  |  | $ | (45,480 | ) | 
| 
    Add (subtract):
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,682 |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
    
 |  |  | 14,983 |  |  |  | 12,064 |  |  |  | 7,567 |  |  |  | 8,106 |  |  |  | 12,940 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense
    
 |  |  | 14,829 |  |  |  | 13,195 |  |  |  | 7,244 |  |  |  | 9,796 |  |  |  | 5,235 |  | 
| 
    Provision for income taxes
    
 |  |  | 27,745 |  |  |  | 29,138 |  |  |  | 6,481 |  |  |  | 5,267 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of
    debt
    
 |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | 1,605 |  |  |  | 2,972 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Miscellaneous (income) expense
    
 |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  | 52 |  |  |  | 43 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cumulative effect of change in
    accounting principle
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51,630 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjusted EBITDA
    
 |  | $ | 115,910 |  |  | $ | 105,385 |  |  | $ | 40,389 |  |  | $ | 30,105 |  |  | $ | 33,007 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Supplemental Information:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncash (gain) loss on forward
    exchange contracts
    
 |  |  | (4,203 | ) |  |  | (3,793 | ) |  |  | (1,290 | ) |  |  | 3,230 |  |  |  | 1,098 |  | 
| 
    Nonrecurring provision for prior
    period debt service
    
 |  |  | 750 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (3) |  | Source: Americas Commercial Transportation Research Co. LLC and
    ACT Publications. | 
    
    34
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 7. | Managements
    Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
    Operations | 
 
    You should read the following discussion and analysis in
    conjunction with the information set forth under
    Item 6  Selected Financial Data and
    our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
    included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
    The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook,
    our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and
    capital resources and other non-historical statements in this
    discussion are forward-looking statements. See
    Forward-Looking Information on page ii of this
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
    These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks
    and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and
    uncertainties described under Item 1A 
    Risk Factors. Our actual results may differ materially
    from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking
    statements.
 
    Company
    Overview
 
    We are a leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions
    for the global commercial vehicle market, including the
    Heavy-duty (Class 8) truck market, the construction
    and agriculture market and the specialty and military
    transportation markets. As a result of our strong leadership in
    cab-related products and systems, we are positioned to benefit
    from the increased focus of our customers on cab design and
    comfort and convenience features to better serve their end-user,
    the driver. Our products include suspension seat systems,
    interior trim systems (including instrument panels, door panels,
    headliners, cabinetry and floor systems), cab structures and
    components, mirrors, wiper systems, electronic wire harness
    assemblies and controls and switches specifically designed for
    applications in commercial vehicles.
 
    We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
    by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
    a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
    believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
    our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
    American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
    systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
    interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
    other structural components. We believe our products are used by
    virtually every major North American commercial vehicle OEM,
    which we believe creates an opportunity to cross-sell our
    products and offer a fully integrated system solution.
 
    Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
    new commercial vehicles manufactured, which in turn is a
    function of general economic conditions, interest rates, changes
    in governmental regulations, consumer spending, fuel costs and
    our customers inventory levels and production rates. New
    commercial vehicle demand has historically been cyclical and is
    particularly sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy,
    which generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage
    hauled by commercial vehicles. Production of commercial vehicles
    in North America peaked in 1999 and experienced a downturn from
    2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak economy, an oversupply of
    new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on commercial
    vehicles and equipment. Demand for commercial vehicles improved
    in 2006 due to broad economic recovery in North America,
    corresponding growth in the movement of goods, the growing need
    to replace aging truck fleets and OEMs received larger than
    expected pre-orders in anticipation of the new EPA emissions
    standards becoming effective in 2007.
 
    In 2006, approximately 60% of our revenue was generated from
    sales to North American heavy-duty truck OEMs. Our remaining
    revenue in 2006 was primarily derived from sales to OEMs in the
    global construction market, the aftermarket, OEM service
    organizations and other commercial vehicle and specialty
    markets. Demand for our products is also driven to a significant
    degree by preferences of the end-user of the commercial vehicle,
    particularly with respect to Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) trucks. Unlike the automotive industry,
    commercial vehicle OEMs generally afford the ultimate end-user
    the ability to specify many of the component parts that will be
    used to manufacture the commercial vehicle, including a wide
    variety of cab interior styles and colors, the brand and type of
    seats, type of seat fabric and color and specific mirror
    styling. In addition, certain of our products are only utilized
    in Heavy-duty (Class 8) trucks, such as our storage
    systems, sleeper boxes, sleeper bunks and privacy curtains, and,
    as a result, changes in demand for Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) trucks or the mix of options on a vehicle
    can have a greater impact on our business than changes in the
    overall
    
    35
 
    demand for commercial vehicles. To the extent that demand
    increases for higher content vehicles, our revenues and gross
    profit will be positively impacted.
 
    Along with North America, we have operations in Europe,
    Australia, Mexico and China. Our operating results are,
    therefore, impacted by exchange rate fluctuations to the extent
    we are unable to match revenues received in such currencies with
    costs incurred in such currencies. Strengthening of these
    foreign currencies as compared to the U.S. dollar resulted
    in an approximate $3.0 million decrease in our revenues in
    2006 as compared to 2005 and an approximate $1.0 million
    increase in 2005 as compared to 2004. Because our costs were
    generally impacted to the same degree as our revenue, this
    exchange rate fluctuation did not have a material impact on our
    net income in 2005 as compared to 2006 and 2005 compared to 2004.
 
    We continuously seek ways to improve our operating performance
    by lowering costs. These efforts include, but are not limited
    to, the following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | establishing sourcing efforts in China and Europe; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | eliminating excess production capacity through the closure and
    consolidation of manufacturing or assembly facilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | implementing Lean Manufacturing and Total Quality Production
    System (TQPS) initiatives to improve operating
    efficiency and product quality. | 
 
    Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
    new vehicle production, we also have the opportunity to grow
    through increasing our product content per vehicle through cross
    selling and bundling of products. We generally compete for new
    business at the beginning of the development of a new vehicle
    platform and upon the redesign of existing programs. New
    platform development generally begins at least one to three
    years before the marketing of such models by our customers.
    Contract durations for commercial vehicle products generally
    extend for the entire life of the platform, which is typically
    five to seven years.
 
    In sourcing products for a specific platform, the customer
    generally develops a proposed production timetable, including
    current volume and option mix estimates based on their own
    assumptions, and then sources business with the supplier
    pursuant to written contracts, purchase orders or other firm
    commitments in terms of price, quality, technology and delivery.
    In general, these contracts, purchase orders and commitments
    provide that the customer can terminate if a supplier does not
    meet specified quality and delivery requirements and, in many
    cases, they provide that the price will decrease over the
    proposed production timetable. Awarded business generally covers
    the supply of all or a portion of a customers production
    and service requirements for a particular product program rather
    than the supply of a specific quantity of products. Accordingly,
    in estimating awarded business over the life of a contract or
    other commitment, a supplier must make various assumptions as to
    the estimated number of vehicles expected to be produced, the
    timing of that production, mix of options on the vehicles
    produced and pricing of the products being supplied. The actual
    production volumes and option mix of vehicles produced by
    customers depend on a number of factors that are beyond a
    suppliers control.
 
    Recent
    Acquisitions
 
    On November 29, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
    stock of C.I.E.B. C.I.E.B. is a manufacturer of seats primarily
    for the commercial vehicle market. The C.I.E.B. acquisition was
    financed with borrowings from our revolving credit facility. The
    operating results of C.I.E.B. have been included in our 2006
    consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
 
    Critical
    Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
    Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity
    with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
    States of America (U.S. GAAP). For a
    comprehensive discussion of our accounting policies, see
    Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in
    Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
 
    The preparation of our consolidated financial statements
    requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
    reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
    contingent assets and liabilities at
    
    36
 
    the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
    revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These
    estimates and assumptions, particularly relating to revenue
    recognition and sales commitments, provision for income taxes,
    restructuring and impairment charges and litigation and
    contingencies may have a material impact on our financial
    statements, and are discussed in detail throughout our analysis
    of our results of operations.
 
    In addition to evaluating estimates relating to the items
    discussed above, we also consider other estimates, including,
    but not limited to, those related to allowance for doubtful
    accounts, defined benefit pension plan assumptions, uncertain
    tax positions and goodwill and other intangible assets. We base
    our estimates on historical experience and various other
    assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
    circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
    judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities and
    equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
    results and outcomes could differ materially from these
    estimates and assumptions. See Item 1A  Risk
    Factors for additional information regarding risk factors
    that may impact our estimates.
 
    We apply the following critical accounting polices in the
    preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
 
    Revenue Recognition and Sales Commitments  We
    recognize revenue in accordance with the SECs Staff
    Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue
    Recognition in Financial Statements, and
    SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and other
    authoritative accounting literature. These pronouncements
    generally require that we recognize revenue when
    (1) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
    (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
    (3) there is a fixed or determinable price and
    (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Our products are
    generally shipped from our facilities to our customers, which is
    when legal title passes to the customer for substantially all of
    our revenues. We enter into agreements with our customers at the
    beginning of a given platforms life to supply products for
    that platform. Once we enter into such agreements, fulfillment
    of our purchasing requirements is our obligation for the entire
    production life of the platform, with terms generally ranging
    from five to seven years, and we have no provisions to terminate
    such contracts.
 
    Provisions for anticipated contract losses are recognized at the
    time they become evident. In certain instances, we may be
    committed under existing agreements to supply product to our
    customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to cover the
    cost to produce such product. In such situations, we record a
    provision for the estimated future amount of such losses. Such
    losses are recognized at the time that the loss is probable and
    reasonably estimable and are recorded at the minimum amount
    necessary to fulfill our obligations to our customers. We had no
    such recorded loss as of December 31, 2006 and
    $0.1 million and $0.6 million at December 31,
    2005 and 2004, respectively.
 
    Goodwill and Intangible Assets  Goodwill
    represents the excess of acquisition purchase price over the
    fair value of net assets acquired. In July 2001, the Financial
    Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
    of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
    No. 141, Business Combinations, and
    SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
    SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations
    initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the
    purchase method of accounting. Under SFAS No. 142,
    goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no
    longer amortized, but reviewed annually or more frequently if
    impairment indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that
    are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be
    amortized over their useful lives, but with no maximum life.
    Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on
    January 1, 2002, goodwill was being amortized on a
    straight-line basis over 40 years.
 
    We review goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
    impairment annually in the second fiscal quarter and whenever
    events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value
    may not be recoverable in accordance with
    SFAS No. 142. We review definite-lived intangible
    assets in accordance with the provisions of
    SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144, Accounting
    for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The
    provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step
    impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we
    compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying
    value. Our reporting unit is consistent with the reportable
    segment identified in Note 10 to our consolidated financial
    statements contained in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006. If the fair value of
    the reporting unit
    
    37
 
    exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that
    unit, goodwill is considered not impaired and we are not
    required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of
    the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair
    value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the second
    step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied
    fair value of the reporting units goodwill. If the
    carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds its
    implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss
    equal to the difference. SFAS No. 142 also requires
    that the fair value of the purchased intangible assets with
    indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the carrying
    value. We estimate the fair value of these intangible assets
    using an income approach. We recognize an impairment loss when
    the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than
    the carrying value. In this regard, our management considers the
    following indicators in determining if events or changes in
    circumstances have occurred indicating that the recoverability
    of the carrying amount of indefinite-lived and amortizing
    intangible assets should be assessed: (1) a significant
    decrease in the market value of an asset; (2) a significant
    change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or a
    significant physical change in an asset; (3) a significant
    adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
    could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or
    assessment by a regulator; (4) an accumulation of costs
    significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to
    acquire or construct an asset; and (5) a current period
    operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating
    or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
    demonstrates continuing losses associated with an asset used for
    the purpose of producing revenue. Our annual goodwill and
    indefinite-lived (SFAS No. 142) and definite-life
    intangible asset (SFAS No. 144) impairment analysis
    was performed during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 and did
    not result in an impairment charge.
 
    Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in
    nature and involves the use of significant estimates and
    assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue
    growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected
    future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic
    and market conditions and determination of appropriate market
    comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
    believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and
    inherently uncertain. The valuation approaches we use include
    the Income Approach (the Discounted Cash Flow Method) and the
    Market Approach (the Guideline Company and Transaction Methods)
    to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit; earnings are
    emphasized in the Discounted Cash Flow, Guideline Company, and
    the Transaction Methods. In addition, these methods utilize
    market data in the derivation of a value estimate and are
    forward-looking in nature. The Discounted Cash Flow Method
    utilizes a market-derived rate of return to discount anticipated
    performance, while the Guideline Company Method and the
    Transaction Method incorporate multiples that are based on the
    markets assessment of future performance. Actual future
    results may differ materially from those estimates.
 
    Intangible
    Assets  Indefinite-Lived
 
    Basis
    for Accounting Treatment
 
    Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of customer
    relationships acquired in the 2005 acquisitions of Mayflower and
    Monona. We have accounted for these customer relationships as
    indefinite-lived intangible assets, which we believe is
    appropriate based upon the following circumstances and
    conditions under which we operate:
 
    Sourcing,
    Barriers to Entry and Competitor Risks
 
    The customer sourcing decision for the Mayflower and Monona
    businesses is heavily predicated on price, quality, delivery and
    the overall customer relationship. Absent a significant change
    in any or all of these factors, it is unlikely that a customer
    would source production to an alternate supplier. In addition,
    the factors listed below impose a high barrier for new
    competitors to enter into this industry. Historical experience
    indicates that Mayflower and Monona have not lost any primary
    customers
    and/or
    relationships due to these factors and such loss is not
    anticipated in the foreseeable future for the following reasons:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Costs associated with setting up a new production line,
    including tooling costs, are typically cost prohibitive in a
    competitive pricing environment; | 
    
    38
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | The risk associated with potential production delays and a
    disruption to the supply chain typically outweighs any potential
    economic benefit; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Significant initial outlays of capital and institutional
    production knowledge represent a significant barrier to entry.
    Due to the asset-intensive nature of the businesses, a new
    competitor would require a substantial amount of initial capital; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Changeover costs are high both from an economic and risk
    standpoint; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The highly complex nature of successfully producing electronic
    wiring harnesses and complete cab structures in accordance with
    OEM quality standards makes it difficult for a competitor to
    enter the business; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | There is significant risk in operating the businesses as a
    result of the highly customized nature of the business. For
    example, production runs in the commercial vehicle business are
    significantly smaller and are more build to order in
    nature which requires the systems, expertise, equipment and
    logistics in order to be successful. | 
 
    These costs and risks are the primary prohibiting factors which
    preclude our customers from sourcing their business elsewhere at
    any given time.
 
    Duration
    and Strength of Existing Customer Relationships/Concentrations
    of Revenue
 
    Mayflower and Monona have long-standing relationships with their
    existing customers and have experienced de minimis historical
    attrition. These relationships have endured over time and,
    accordingly, an assumption of prospective attrition is
    inconsistent with this historical experience and
    managements expectations. Both Mayflower and Monona have a
    limited customer base, consisting of three primary customers,
    that has existed for many years, and we had pre-existing
    long-standing relationships with the same primary customers
    prior to the acquisitions of Mayflower and Monona, which in most
    cases have exceeded a period of 40 years. We believe the
    addition of Mayflower and Monona further strengthens our
    existing customer relationships with such customers.
    Specifically:
 
    Mayflower and Mononas relationships with their
    customers key decision-making personnel are mature and
    stable.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflowers and Mononas customers typically make
    purchasing decisions through a team approach versus a single
    decision maker. Mayflower and Monona have historically
    maintained strong relationships with individuals at all levels
    of the decision making process including the engineering,
    operations and purchasing functions in order to successfully
    minimize the impact of any employee turnover at the customer
    level. | 
 
    The top three customers of Mayflower and Monona have been
    established customers for a substantial period of time.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower has had relationships with Volvo/Mack, Freightliner
    and International since 1965, 1997 and 2001, respectively. We
    and/or our
    predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with these
    same customers since 1949, 1954 and 1950, respectively. These
    customers comprised approximately 88% and 85% of
    Mayflowers revenues for fiscal years 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Monona has had relationships with Deere & Co.,
    Caterpillar and Oshkosh since 1969, 1970 and 1985, respectively.
    We and/or
    our predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with
    these same customers since 1987, 1958 and 1950, respectively.
    These customers comprised approximately 85% and 88% of
    Mononas revenues for fiscal years 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
 
    Valuation
    Methodology
 
    For valuation purposes, the income approach using the discounted
    cash flow method was employed for the purpose of evaluating the
    Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets.
    Under this
    
    39
 
    approach, we determined that the fair value of the Mayflower and
    Monona customer relationship intangible assets at their dates of
    acquisition was $45.9 million and $28.9 million,
    respectively.
 
    Significant assumptions used in the valuation and determination
    of an indefinite useful life for these customer relationship
    intangible assets included the following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | The revenue projections that we relied upon to substantiate the
    economic consideration paid for the businesses is almost
    exclusively tied to the existing customer base. With regard to
    the valuation process, we projected less than 1% of total
    revenue in 2005 and 2006 to be lost due to core customer
    attrition and no core customer attrition thereafter. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Contributory asset charges were deducted for assets that
    contribute to income generation including: (i) net working
    capital; (ii) personal property; (iii) real property;
    (iv) tradename and trademarks; and (v) an assembled
    workforce. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The cash flows associated with the customer relationships
    acquired in the Mayflower and Monona transactions were
    discounted at a rate of return of 25.0% and 29.5%, respectively,
    which is approximately equal to the equity rate of return. | 
 
    Intangible
    Asset Impairment  Accounting Treatment
 
    If Mayflower
    and/or
    Monona were to prospectively lose any of their customers, in
    accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 16 and 17 of
    SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
    Assets, we would perform an intangible asset impairment test
    to determine the impact of the loss on the customer relationship
    intangible asset and if impairment was indicated, we would
    record an impairment loss in our consolidated statement of
    operations.
 
    Accounting for Income Taxes  As part of the
    process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we
    are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the
    jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, tax expense
    includes the impact of differing treatment of items for tax and
    accounting purposes which result in deferred tax assets and
    liabilities which are included in our consolidated balance
    sheet. To the extent that recovery of deferred tax assets is not
    likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Significant
    judgment is required in determining our provision for income
    taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation
    allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. As of
    December 31, 2004, we determined that we do not require a
    valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets due to the
    likelihood of recovery in future periods. In the event that our
    actual results differ from our estimates or we adjust these
    estimates in future periods, the effects of these adjustments
    could materially impact our financial position and results of
    operations. The net deferred tax liability as of
    December 31, 2006 was $1.8 million. We will adopt FASB
    Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
    Income Taxes  an Interpretation of FASB Statement
    No. 109, (FIN 48) in the first quarter
    2007. The adoption of this interpretation will change the manner
    in which we evaluate recognition and measurement of uncertain
    tax positions. See Recently Issued Accounting
    Pronouncements in Note 2 to our consolidated
    financial statements for further information regarding the
    adoption of this authoritative literature.
 
    Warranties  We are subjected to warranty
    claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
    design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
    require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
    products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
    products. Depending on the terms under which we supplied
    products to our customers, a customer may hold us responsible
    for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective
    products, when the product supplied did not perform as
    represented. Our policy is to reserve for estimated future
    customer warranty costs based on historical trends and current
    economic factors. The amount of such estimates for warranty
    provisions was approximately $5.2 million,
    $7.1 million and $2.4 million at December 31,
    2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase in estimate from
    2004 to 2005 is primarily the result of the Mayflower, Monona
    and Cabarrus acquisitions.
 
    Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
    Plans  We sponsor pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans that cover certain hourly and
    salaried employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Our
    policy is
    
    40
 
    to make annual contributions to the plans to fund the normal
    cost as required by local regulations. In addition, we have an
    other post-retirement benefit plan for certain
    U.S. operations, retirees and their dependents.
 
    Our
    Assumptions
 
    The determination of pension and other post-retirement benefit
    plan obligations and related expenses requires the use of
    assumptions to estimate the amount of the benefits that
    employees earn while working, as well as the present value of
    those benefits. Our assumptions are determined based on current
    market conditions, historical information and consultation with
    and input from our actuaries. Due to the significant management
    judgment involved, our assumptions could have a material impact
    on the measurement of our pension and other post-retirement
    benefit expenses and obligations.
 
    Significant assumptions used to measure our annual pension and
    other post-retirement benefit expenses include:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | discount rate; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | expected return on plan assets; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | health care cost trend rates. | 
 
    Discount Rate  The discount rate represents
    the interest rate that should be used to determine the present
    value of future cash flows currently expected to be required to
    settle the pension and other post-retirement benefit
    obligations. In estimating this rate, we consider rates of
    return on high quality fixed-income investments included in
    various published bond indexes. We consider the Moodys Aa
    Corporate Bond Index and the Barclays Capital AA Rated
    Sterling Bond Index in the determination of the appropriate
    discount rate assumptions. The weighted average rate we used to
    measure our pension obligation as of December 31, 2006 was
    5.8% for the U.S. and 5.0% for the non-U.S pension plans.
 
    Expected Long-Term Rate of Return  The
    expected return on pension plan assets is based on our
    historical experience, our pension plan investment strategy and
    our expectations for long-term rates of return. Our pension plan
    investment strategy is reviewed annually and is established
    based upon plan liabilities, an evaluation of market conditions,
    tolerance for risk and cash requirements for benefit payments.
    We use a third-party advisor to assist us in determining our
    investment allocation and modeling our long-term rate of return
    assumptions. For 2006 and 2005, we assumed an expected long-term
    rate of return on plan assets of 8.5 percent and
    8.5 percent, respectively, for the U.S. pension plans
    and 6.0 percent and 7.5 percent, respectively, for the
    non-U.S. pension
    plans.
 
    Changes in the discount rate and expected long-term rate of
    return on plan assets within the range indicated below would
    have had the following impact on 2006 pension and other
    post-retirement benefits results (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  | 
|  |  | Point Increase |  |  | Point Decrease |  | 
|  | 
| 
    (Decrease) increase due to change
    in assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs for
    the year ended December 31, 2006:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Discount rate
    
 |  | $ | (351 | ) |  | $ | 579 |  | 
| 
    Expected long-term rate of return
    on plan assets
    
 |  | $ | (566 | ) |  | $ | 566 |  | 
| 
    (Decrease) increase due to change
    in assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for the
    year ended December 31, 2006:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Discount rate
    
 |  | $ | (11,929 | ) |  | $ | 15,675 |  | 
 
    Health Care Cost Trend Rates  The health care
    cost trend rates represent the annual rates of change in the
    cost of health care benefits based on estimates of health care
    inflation, changes in health care utilization or delivery
    patterns, technological advances and changes in the health
    status of the plan participants. For measurement purposes, a 10%
    annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health
    care benefits was assumed for 2006 and 2005. The rate was
    assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% through 2011 and
    
    41
 
    remain constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost trend rates
    can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for other
    post-retirement benefit plans.
 
    Differences in the ultimate health care cost trend rates within
    the range indicated below would have had the following impact on
    2006 other post-retirement benefit results (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  | 
|  |  | Point Increase |  |  | Point Decrease |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Increase (Decrease) from change in
    health care cost trend rates
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other post-retirement benefit
    expense
    
 |  | $ | 20 |  |  | $ | (19 | ) | 
| 
    Other post-retirement benefit
    liability
    
 |  | $ | 102 |  |  | $ | (95 | ) | 
 
    Recently
    Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
    See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in
    Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for a full description of recently issued
    and/or
    adopted accounting pronouncements.
 
    Results
    of Operations
 
    The table below sets forth certain operating data expressed as a
    percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Revenues
    
 |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 100.0 | % | 
| 
    Cost of revenues
    
 |  |  | 83.7 |  |  |  | 82.2 |  |  |  | 81.4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross profit
    
 |  |  | 16.3 |  |  |  | 17.8 |  |  |  | 18.6 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and
    administrative expenses
    
 |  |  | 5.7 |  |  |  | 5.9 |  |  |  | 7.6 |  | 
| 
    Noncash option charge
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.7 |  | 
| 
    Amortization expense
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating income
    
 |  |  | 10.6 |  |  |  | 11.9 |  |  |  | 8.3 |  | 
| 
    Other (income)
    
 |  |  | (0.4 | ) |  |  | (0.5 | ) |  |  | (0.3 | ) | 
| 
    Interest expense
    
 |  |  | 1.6 |  |  |  | 1.7 |  |  |  | 1.9 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of
    debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  | 0.4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income before income taxes
    
 |  |  | 9.4 |  |  |  | 10.5 |  |  |  | 6.3 |  | 
| 
    Provision for income taxes
    
 |  |  | 3.0 |  |  |  | 3.9 |  |  |  | 1.7 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
    
 |  |  | 6.4 | % |  |  | 6.6 | % |  |  | 4.6 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Year
    Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
    December 31, 2005
 
    Revenues.  Revenues increased
    $164.3 million, or 21.8%, to $918.8 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2006 from $754.5 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase resulted
    primarily from:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | increased acquisition related revenue of approximately
    $77.0 million from the full year impact of the acquisitions
    of Mayflower, Monona, Cabarrus and the partial year impact of
    C.I.E.B.; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | a 10.9% increase in North American Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) truck production, fluctuations in production
    levels for other North American end markets and net new business
    awards resulted in approximately $88.0 million of increased
    revenues; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | an increase in production levels, fluctuations in content and
    net new business awards for our European, Australian and Asian
    markets of approximately $2.5 million; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations and adjustments of
    approximately $3 million. | 
    
    42
 
 
    Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased
    $15.3 million, or 11.4%, to $149.8 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2006 from $134.5 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2005. As a percentage of
    revenues, gross profit decreased to 16.3% for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 from 17.8% for the year ended
    December 31, 2005. This decrease resulted primarily from
    the result of various raw material cost increases as well as
    certain operational and other one-time events during the year.
    We continued to seek material cost reductions, labor
    efficiencies and general operating cost reductions to generate
    additional profits during the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
    Selling, General and Administrative
    Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative
    expenses increased $7.4 million, or 16.6%, to
    $52.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
    from $44.6 million for the year ended December 31,
    2005. This increase resulted primarily from the full year impact
    of the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus during
    2005 as well as increases in wages and the cost of adopting
    FAS 123(r) during the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
    Amortization Expense.  Amortization expense
    increased to approximately $414,000 for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 from approximately $358,000 for the year
    ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily the
    result of the full year impact of the Mayflower and Monona
    acquisitions.
 
    Other (Income).  We use forward exchange
    contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures of our
    United Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues
    and purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations and
    will hedge a portion of the anticipated long or short position.
    We have not designated any of our forward exchange contracts as
    cash flow hedges, electing instead to
    mark-to-market
    the contracts and record the fair value of the contracts on our
    consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or
    loss recorded in our consolidated statement of operations. The
    $3.5 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2006
    and the $3.7 million gain for the year ended
    December 31, 2005 are primarily related to the noncash
    change in value of the forward exchange contracts in existence
    at the end of each period.
 
    Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased
    $1.6 million to $14.8 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 from $13.2 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily the
    result of higher average interest rates during the year.
 
    Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt.  In 2006,
    we repaid approximately $25.0 million of our
    U.S. dollar denominated term loan. In connection with this
    loan repayment, approximately $0.3 million of deferred fees
    were written off. In 2005, as part of our 2005 issuance of
    8.0% senior notes due 2013, we amended our existing senior
    credit agreement and wrote off approximately $1.5 million
    of deferred fees.
 
    Provision for Income Taxes.  Our effective tax
    rate during the year ended December 31, 2006 was 32.3%
    compared to 37.1% for 2005. Provision for income taxes decreased
    $1.4 million to $27.7 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006, compared to an income tax provision of
    $29.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
    The decrease in effective rate year over year can be primarily
    attributed to the tax planning initiatives taken during 2006
    which favorably impacted tax credits and provision rates.
 
    Net Income.  Net income increased
    $8.7 million to $58.1 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006, compared to $49.4 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2005, primarily as a result of the
    factors discussed above.
 
    Year
    Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
    December 31, 2004
 
    Revenues.  Revenues increased
    $374.1 million, or 98.3%, to $754.5 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2005 from $380.4 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase resulted
    primarily from:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | increased acquisition related revenue of approximately
    $315 million from the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona and
    Cabarrus; | 
    
    43
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | a 27% increase in North American Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) truck production, fluctuations in content
    and production levels for our other North American end markets
    and net new business awards resulted in approximately
    $49 million; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | an increase in production levels, fluctuations in content and
    net new business awards for our European, Australian and Asian
    markets of approximately $11 million; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations and adjustments of
    approximately $1 million. | 
 
    Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased
    $63.7 million, or 90.0%, to $134.5 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2005 from $70.8 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2004. As a percentage of
    revenues, gross profit decreased to 17.8% for the year ended
    December 31, 2005 from 18.6% for the year ended
    December 31, 2004. This decrease resulted primarily from
    the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus, which
    experienced lower margins than those we achieved in the prior
    year. We continued to seek material cost reductions, labor
    efficiencies and general operating cost reductions to generate
    additional profits and to offset incremental costs of raw
    materials and petroleum related products and services
    experienced during the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
    Selling, General and Administrative
    Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative
    expenses increased $15.6 million, or 53.7%, to
    $44.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
    from $29.0 million for the year ended December 31,
    2004. This increase resulted primarily from the acquisitions of
    Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus during the year as well as
    increases in wages and the cost of additional resources to
    accommodate product innovation and growth in the commercial
    vehicle sector as well as the cost associated with being a
    public company.
 
    Stock Compensation Expense.  To reward our
    senior management team for its success in reducing operating
    costs, integrating businesses and improving processes through
    cyclical periods, we granted options to purchase an aggregate of
    910,869 shares of our common stock to 16 members of our
    management team in May 2004. The exercise price for such options
    is $5.54 per share. As modified, such options have a
    ten-year term with 100% of such options being currently
    exercisable. We incurred a compensation charge of
    $10.1 million in the second quarter of 2004 as a result of
    the grant of these options. This compensation charge equaled the
    difference between $5.54 and the fair market value of our common
    stock as of the grant date of these options.
 
    Amortization Expense.  Amortization expense
    increased to approximately $358,000 for the year ended
    December 31, 2005 from $107,000 for the year ended
    December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily the result
    of the increase in deferred financing costs from the prior year
    period, due to fees related to the issuance of our
    8.0% senior notes due 2013, during the year.
 
    Other (Income) Expense.  We use forward
    exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction
    exposures of our United Kingdom operations. We estimate our
    projected revenues and purchases in certain foreign currencies
    or locations and will hedge a portion of the anticipated long or
    short position. We have not designated any of our forward
    exchange contracts as cash flow hedges, electing instead to
    mark-to-market
    the contracts and record the fair value of the contracts on our
    consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or
    loss recorded in our consolidated statement of operations. The
    $3.7 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2005
    and the $1.2 million gain for the year ended
    December 31, 2004 are primarily related to the noncash
    change in value of the forward exchange contracts in existence
    at the end of each period.
 
    Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased
    $6.0 million, or 83.3%, to $13.2 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2005 from $7.2 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2004. This increase was primarily the
    result of an increase in total debt due to acquisitions made
    during the year.
 
    Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt.  As part
    of our August 2004 initial public offering, we wrote off
    capitalized debt financing costs which approximated
    $1.6 million. As part of our 2005 issuance of
    8.0% senior notes due 2013 and amendment of our existing
    senior credit agreement, we wrote off approximately
    $1.5 million of deferred fees.
    
    44
 
 
    Provision for Income Taxes.  Our effective tax
    rate during the year ended December 31, 2005 was 37.1%
    compared to 27.1% for 2004. Provision for income taxes increased
    $22.6 million to $29.1 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2005, compared to an income tax provision of
    $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
    increase in effective rate year over year can be primarily
    attributed to the reversal of the existing valuation allowance
    in 2004 after consideration of our future profitability.
 
    Net Income.  Net income increased
    $31.9 million to $49.4 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2005, compared to $17.5 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2004, primarily as a result of the
    factors discussed above.
 
    Liquidity
    and Capital Resources
 
    Cash
    Flows
 
    For the year ended December 31, 2006, cash provided by
    operations was $36.9 million, compared to
    $44.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2005.
    This decrease was primarily the result of the increases in
    prepaid expenses, accounts receivable and inventories during the
    year. Cash provided by operations in the year ended
    December 31, 2004 was $34.2 million.
 
    Net cash used in investing activities was $27.6 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to
    $188.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2005 and
    $8.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2004. The
    amounts used in the year ended December 31, 2006 primarily
    reflect capital expenditure purchases and the acquisition of
    C.I.E.B. During 2005 and 2004, all net cash used in investing
    activities was for acquisitions and capital expenditures,
    primarily for equipment and tooling purchases related to new or
    replacement programs and current equipment upgrades.
 
    Net cash used in financing activities totaled $28.0 million
    for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to net cash
    provided by of $188.5 million in the year ended
    December 31, 2005 and net cash used of $28.4 million
    in the year ended December 31, 2004. The net cash used in
    financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2006
    was primarily related to our repayment of our U.S. dollar
    denominated term loan. The net cash provided for
    December 31, 2005 was primarily related to the issuance of
    our 8.0% senior notes and the net cash used during the year
    ended December 31, 2004 was primarily related to repayments
    of outstanding borrowings.
 
    Debt
    and Credit Facilities
 
    As of December 31, 2006, we had an aggregate of
    $162.1 million of outstanding indebtedness excluding
    $1.8 million of outstanding letters of credit under various
    financing arrangements. We were in compliance with all of our
    respective financial covenants under our debt and senior credit
    facility as of December 31, 2006. The indebtedness
    consisted of the following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | $1.5 million under our revolving credit facility,
    $10.3 million under our term loan facility and
    $0.3 million of capital lease obligations. The weighted
    average rate on these borrowings, for the year ended
    December 31, 2006, ranged from approximately 7.1% with
    respect to the revolving borrowings to approximately 6.8% for
    the term loan borrowings and; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | $150 million of 8.0% senior notes due 2013. | 
 
    In August 2004, in connection with our initial public offering,
    we entered into a senior credit facility, consisting of a
    $65.0 million term loan and a $40.0 million revolving
    line of credit. We used borrowings under the term loan, together
    with proceeds of the offering to repay all of our existing
    borrowings under our then-existing senior credit facility and to
    repay all of our then existing subordinated indebtedness.
 
    In February 2005, in connection with the Mayflower acquisition,
    we amended our senior credit facility to increase the revolving
    credit facility from $40.0 million to $75.0 million
    and the term loans from $65.0 million to
    $145.0 million. We used borrowings of approximately
    $106.4 million under our amended senior credit facility to
    fund substantially all of the purchase price for the Mayflower
    acquisition.
    
    45
 
 
    On June 3, 2005, in connection with the Monona acquisition,
    we amended our senior credit facility to increase the revolving
    credit facility from $75.0 million to $100.0 million.
    In addition, the amendment increased certain baskets in the
    lien, investments and asset disposition covenants to reflect our
    increased size as a result of the Mayflower and Monona
    acquisitions. We used revolving credit borrowings of
    approximately $58.0 million under our amended senior credit
    facility to fund substantially all of the purchase price for the
    Monona acquisition.
 
    On July 6, 2005, we completed a secondary equity offering
    and the offering of the 8.0% senior notes due 2013. We used
    the net proceeds of these offerings of approximately
    $190.8 million primarily to repay a portion of the
    borrowings under our senior credit facility. In connection with
    the offering of the 8.0% senior notes due 2013, we entered into
    an additional amendment to our senior credit facility which
    provides for, among other things, the incurrence of debt in
    connection with the offering of the 8.0% senior notes due
    2013 and the application of the net proceeds therefrom.
 
    On December 30, 2005, we entered into an additional
    amendment to our senior credit facility to increase our annual
    capital expenditure limit from $25.0 million per year to
    $40.0 million per year.
 
    On June 30, 2006, we repaid approximately
    $25.0 million of our U.S. dollar denominated term
    loan. The repayment of the term loan reduced the overall
    borrowing capacity on the existing senior credit agreement from
    approximately $140 to $115 million. In connection with this
    loan repayment, approximately $0.3 million of deferred
    fees, representing a proportionate amount of total deferred
    fees, were expensed as a loss on early extinguishment of debt.
 
    The revolving credit facility is available until
    January 31, 2010 and the term loans are due and payable on
    December 31, 2010. Based on the provisions of the
    AICPAs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
    No. 98-14,
    Debtors Accounting for the Changes in
    Line-of-Credit
    or Revolving-Debt Arrangements, and the provisions of EITF
    Issue
    No. 96-19,
    Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
    Debt Instruments, approximately $4.8 million third
    party fees relating to the senior credit agreement and
    8.0% senior notes due 2013 were capitalized at
    December 31, 2006 and are being amortized over the life of
    the senior credit facility.
 
    Under the terms of our senior credit facility, availability
    under the revolving credit facility is subject to the lesser of
    (i) a borrowing base that is equal to the sum of
    (a) 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus (b) 50%
    of eligible inventory; or (ii) $100.0 million.
    Borrowings under the senior credit facility bear interest at a
    floating rate which can be either the prime rate or LIBOR plus
    the applicable margin to the prime rate and LIBOR borrowings
    based on our leverage ratio. The senior credit facility contains
    various financial covenants, including a minimum fixed charge
    coverage ratio of not less than 1.30, and a minimum ratio of
    EBITDA to cash interest expense of not less than 2.50, in each
    case for the twelve month period ending on December 31 of
    each year, a limitation on the amount of capital expenditures of
    not more than $40.0 million in any fiscal year and a
    maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA as of the last day
    of each fiscal quarter as set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Quarter(s) Ending
 |  | Maximum Total Leverage Ratio |  | 
|  | 
| 
    12/31/05
    through
    9/30/06
    
 |  |  | 2.75 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    12/31/06
    and each fiscal quarter thereafter
    
 |  |  | 2.50 to 1.00 |  | 
 
    The senior credit facility also contains covenants restricting
    certain corporate actions, including asset dispositions,
    acquisitions, dividends, changes of control, incurring
    indebtedness, making loans and investments and transactions with
    affiliates. If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
    such ratios, our lenders could declare a default under the
    senior credit facility, and our indebtedness thereunder could be
    declared immediately due and payable. The senior credit facility
    is collateralized by substantially all of our assets. The senior
    credit facility also contains customary events of default.
 
    The 8.0% senior notes due 2013 are senior unsecured
    obligations and rank pari passu in right of payment to
    all of our existing and future senior indebtedness and are
    effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured
    obligations. The 8.0% senior notes due 2013 are guaranteed
    by all of our domestic subsidiaries.
    
    46
 
 
    The indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes due 2013
    contain covenants that limit, among other things, additional
    indebtedness, issuance of preferred stock, dividends,
    repurchases of capital stock or subordinated indebtedness,
    investments, liens, restrictions on the ability of our
    subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, sales of assets,
    sale/leaseback transactions, mergers and transactions with
    affiliates. Upon a change of control, each holder shall have the
    right to require that we purchase such holders securities
    at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal
    amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
    repurchase. The indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes due
    2013 also contains customary events of default.
 
    In addition, prior to May 2, 2005, we also had
    $6.5 million of indebtedness from borrowings financed
    through the issuance of industrial development bonds relating to
    our Vonore, Tennessee facility. These borrowings had a final
    maturity of August 1, 2006 and bore interest at a variable
    rate which was adjusted on a weekly basis by the placement agent
    such that the interest rate on the bonds was sufficient to cause
    the market value of the bonds to be equal to, as nearly as
    practicable, 100% of their principal amount. On May 2, 2005
    we redeemed these bonds for approximately $6.5 million.
 
    We believe that cash flow from operating activities together
    with available borrowings under our senior credit facility will
    be sufficient to fund currently anticipated working capital,
    planned capital spending and debt service requirements for at
    least the next twelve months. Capital expenditures for 2007 are
    expected to be approximately $23 million.
 
    Contractual
    Obligations and Commercial Commitments
 
    The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of
    December 31, 2006:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Payments Due by Period |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Less Than 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | More Than 
 |  | 
|  |  | Total |  |  | 1 Year |  |  | 1-3 Years |  |  | 3-5 Years |  |  | 5 Years |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Long-term debt obligations
    
 |  | $ | 162,114 |  |  | $ | 2,158 |  |  | $ | 5,420 |  |  | $ | 4,536 |  |  | $ | 150,000 |  | 
| 
    Estimated interest payments
    
 |  |  | 43,411 |  |  |  | 12,753 |  |  |  | 12,501 |  |  |  | 12,157 |  |  |  | 6,000 |  | 
| 
    Operating lease obligations
    
 |  |  | 56,401 |  |  |  | 7,430 |  |  |  | 13,484 |  |  |  | 10,244 |  |  |  | 25,243 |  | 
| 
    Pension and other post-retirement
    funding
    
 |  |  | 34,918 |  |  |  | 2,279 |  |  |  | 5,162 |  |  |  | 6,262 |  |  |  | 21,215 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
    
 |  | $ | 296,844 |  |  | $ | 24,620 |  |  | $ | 36,567 |  |  | $ | 33,199 |  |  | $ | 202,458 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Since December 31, 2006, there have been no material
    changes outside the ordinary course of business to our
    contractual obligations as set forth above.
 
    In addition to the obligations noted above, we have obligations
    reported as other long-term liabilities that consist primarily
    of facility closure and consolidation costs, defined benefit
    plan and other post-retirement benefit plans and other items. We
    also enter into agreements with our customers at the beginning
    of a given platforms life to supply products for the
    entire life of that vehicle platform, which is typically five to
    seven years. These agreements generally provide for the supply
    of a customers production requirements for a particular
    platform, rather than for the purchase of a specific quantity of
    products. Accordingly, our obligations under these agreements
    are not reflected in the contractual obligations table above.
 
    As of December 31, 2006, we were not party to significant
    purchase obligations for goods or services.
 
    Off-Balance
    Sheet Arrangements
 
    We use standby letters of credit to guarantee our performance
    under various contracts and arrangements, principally in
    connection with our workers compensation liabilities and
    for leases on equipment and facilities. These letter of credit
    contracts are usually extended on a
    year-to-year
    basis. As of December 31, 2006, we had outstanding letters
    of credit of $1.8 million. We do not believe that these
    letters of credit will be required to be drawn.
 
    We currently have no non-consolidated special purpose entity
    arrangements.
    
    47
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 7A. | Quantitative
    and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 
 
    Interest
    Rate Risk
 
    We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in
    foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk
    is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market
    rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest
    rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial
    instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We do enter
    into financial instruments, from time to time, to manage and
    reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
    and interest rates and to hedge a portion of future anticipated
    currency transactions. The counterparties are primarily major
    financial institutions.
 
    We manage our interest rate risk by balancing the amount of our
    fixed rate and variable rate debt. For fixed rate debt, interest
    rate changes affect the fair market value of such debt but do
    not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely for variable rate
    debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair
    market value of such debt, but do impact future earnings and
    cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.
    Approximately $11.8 million and $40.6 million of our
    debt was variable rate debt at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. Holding other variables constant (such as foreign
    exchange rates and debt levels), a one percentage point change
    in interest rates would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax
    earnings and cash flows for the next year of approximately
    $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The
    impact on the fair market value of our debt at December 31,
    2006 and 2005 would have been insignificant.
 
    Foreign
    Currency Risk
 
    Foreign currency risk is the risk that we will incur economic
    losses due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange
    rates. We use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign
    currency translation exposures of our United Kingdom operations.
    We estimate our projected revenues and purchases in certain
    foreign currencies or locations, and will hedge a portion or all
    of the anticipated long or short position. The contracts
    typically run from three months up to three years. These
    contracts are
    marked-to-market
    and the fair value is included in assets (liabilities) in our
    consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or
    loss included in our consolidated statements of operations. We
    do not hold or issue foreign exchange options or forward
    contracts for trading purposes.
 
    Outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts at
    December 31, 2006 are more fully described in the notes to
    our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
    The fair value of these contracts at December 31, 2006 and
    2005 amounted to $8.5 million and $4.3 million,
    respectively, which is reflected in other assets in our
    consolidated balance sheets. None of these contracts have been
    designated as cash flow hedges; thus, the change in fair value
    at each reporting date is reflected as a noncash charge (income)
    in our consolidated statement of operations. We may designate
    future forward exchange contracts as cash flow hedges.
 
    Our primary exposures to foreign currency exchange fluctuations
    are pound sterling/Eurodollar and pound sterling/Japanese yen.
    At December 31, 2006, the potential reduction in earnings
    from a hypothetical instantaneous 10% adverse change in quoted
    foreign currency spot rates applied to foreign currency
    sensitive instruments is limited by the assumption that all of
    the foreign currencies to which we are exposed would
    simultaneously decrease by 10% because such synchronized changes
    are unlikely to occur. The effects of the forward exchange
    contracts have been included in the above analysis; however, the
    sensitivity model does not include the inherent risks associated
    with the anticipated future transactions denominated in foreign
    currency.
 
    Foreign
    Currency Transactions
 
    A portion of our revenues during the year ended
    December 31, 2006 were derived from manufacturing
    operations outside of the United States. The results of
    operations and the financial position of our operations in these
    other countries are primarily measured in their respective
    currency and translated into U.S. dollars. A portion of the
    expenses generated in these countries is in currencies different
    from which revenue is generated. As discussed above, from time
    to time, we enter into forward exchange contracts to mitigate a
    portion of this
    
    48
 
    currency risk. The reported income of these operations will be
    higher or lower depending on a weakening or strengthening of the
    U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency.
 
    A portion of our assets at December 31, 2006 are based in
    our foreign operations and are translated into U.S. dollars
    at foreign currency exchange rates in effect as of the end of
    each period, with the effect of such translation reflected as a
    separate component of stockholders investment.
    Accordingly, our stockholders investment will fluctuate
    depending upon the weakening or strengthening of the
    U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency.
 
    Effects
    of Inflation
 
    Inflation potentially affects us in two principal ways. First, a
    portion of our debt is tied to prevailing short-term interest
    rates that may change as a result of inflation rates,
    translating into changes in interest expense. Second, general
    inflation can impact material purchases, labor and other costs.
    In many cases, we have limited ability to pass through
    inflation-related cost increases due to the competitive nature
    of the markets that we serve. In the past few years, however,
    inflation has not been a significant factor.
    
    49
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 8. | Financial
    Statements and Supplementary Data | 
 
    INDEX TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
    Documents
    Filed as Part of this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Page | 
|  | 
|  |  |  | 51 |  | 
|  |  |  | 52 |  | 
|  |  |  | 53 |  | 
|  |  |  | 54 |  | 
|  |  |  | 55 |  | 
|  |  |  | 56 |  | 
|  |  |  | 101 |  | 
    
    50
 
 
    REPORT OF
    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
    To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
 
    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
    Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a Delaware
    corporation) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the
    related consolidated statements of operations,
    stockholders investment, and cash flows for each of the
    three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our
    audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
    the Index to Item 8. These consolidated financial
    statements and financial statement schedule are the
    responsibility of the Companys management. Our
    responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated
    financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
    our audits.
 
    We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
    standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
    reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
    statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
    examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
    disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit
    also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
    significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
    the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
    our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
    In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
    fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
    December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of their
    operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
    the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with
    accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
    America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement
    schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
    financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
    material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
    As discussed in Notes 2 and 14 to the consolidated
    financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed its method of
    accounting for defined benefit pension and other post-retirement
    benefit plans and as discussed in Note 13 to the
    consolidated financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed
    its method of accounting for share-based compensation.
 
    We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
    effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
    financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
    criteria established in Internal Control 
    Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
    Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
    March 13, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
    managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
    Companys internal control over financial reporting and an
    unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
    internal control over financial reporting.
 
    /s/  Deloitte &
    Touche LLP
 
 
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    March 13, 2007
    
    51
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    December 31,
    2006 and 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except share 
 |  | 
|  |  | and per share amounts) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    CURRENT ASSETS:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
    
 |  | $ | 19,821 |  |  | $ | 40,641 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable, net of
    reserve for doubtful accounts of $5,536 and $6,087, respectively
    
 |  |  | 123,471 |  |  |  | 114,116 |  | 
| 
    Inventories, net
    
 |  |  | 88,723 |  |  |  | 69,053 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
    
 |  |  | 24,272 |  |  |  | 4,724 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
    
 |  |  | 8,819 |  |  |  | 12,571 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
    
 |  |  | 265,106 |  |  |  | 241,105 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Land and buildings
    
 |  |  | 30,203 |  |  |  | 27,310 |  | 
| 
    Machinery and equipment
    
 |  |  | 120,416 |  |  |  | 93,912 |  | 
| 
    Construction in progress
    
 |  |  | 17,414 |  |  |  | 15,827 |  | 
| 
    Less accumulated depreciation
    
 |  |  | (77,645 | ) |  |  | (56,634 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment, net
    
 |  |  | 90,388 |  |  |  | 80,415 |  | 
| 
    GOODWILL
    
 |  |  | 134,766 |  |  |  | 125,607 |  | 
| 
    INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of
    accumulated amortization of $840 and $451, respectively
    
 |  |  | 84,188 |  |  |  | 84,577 |  | 
| 
    OTHER ASSETS, net
    
 |  |  | 16,374 |  |  |  | 12,179 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL ASSETS
    
 |  | $ | 590,822 |  |  | $ | 543,883 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    LIABILITIES AND
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 | 
| 
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current maturities of long-term
    debt
    
 |  | $ | 2,158 |  |  | $ | 5,309 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
    
 |  |  | 86,610 |  |  |  | 73,709 |  | 
| 
    Accrued liabilities
    
 |  |  | 40,970 |  |  |  | 42,983 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
    
 |  |  | 129,738 |  |  |  | 122,001 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current
    maturities
    
 |  |  | 159,956 |  |  |  | 185,700 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
    
 |  |  | 10,611 |  |  |  | 8,802 |  | 
| 
    PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT
    BENEFITS
    
 |  |  | 22,188 |  |  |  | 20,621 |  | 
| 
    OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
    
 |  |  | 3,424 |  |  |  | 4,682 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities
    
 |  |  | 325,917 |  |  |  | 341,806 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
    (Note 11)
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Preferred stock $.01 par
    value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and
    outstanding; common stock $.01 par value;
    30,000,000 shares authorized; 21,368,831 and
    21,145,954 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    
 |  |  | 214 |  |  |  | 211 |  | 
| 
    Treasury stock purchased from
    employees; 5,836 shares
    
 |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Additional paid-in capital
    
 |  |  | 174,044 |  |  |  | 169,252 |  | 
| 
    Retained earnings
    
 |  |  | 92,007 |  |  |  | 33,957 |  | 
| 
    Accumulated other comprehensive
    loss
    
 |  |  | (1,245 | ) |  |  | (1,343 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total stockholders investment
    
 |  |  | 264,905 |  |  |  | 202,077 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
    
 |  | $ | 590,822 |  |  | $ | 543,883 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    52
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    Years
    Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
    
 |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  |  | $ | 380,445 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
    
 |  |  | 768,913 |  |  |  | 620,031 |  |  |  | 309,696 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
    
 |  |  | 149,838 |  |  |  | 134,450 |  |  |  | 70,749 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND
    ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
    
 |  |  | 51,950 |  |  |  | 44,564 |  |  |  | 39,110 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
    
 |  |  | 414 |  |  |  | 358 |  |  |  | 107 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
    
 |  |  | 97,474 |  |  |  | 89,528 |  |  |  | 31,532 |  | 
| 
    OTHER INCOME
    
 |  |  | (3,468 | ) |  |  | (3,741 | ) |  |  | (1,247 | ) | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE
    
 |  |  | 14,829 |  |  |  | 13,195 |  |  |  | 7,244 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF
    DEBT
    
 |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | 1,605 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income Before Provision for Income
    Taxes
    
 |  |  | 85,795 |  |  |  | 78,549 |  |  |  | 23,930 |  | 
| 
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    
 |  |  | 27,745 |  |  |  | 29,138 |  |  |  | 6,481 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCOME
    
 |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
    
 |  | $ | 2.74 |  |  | $ | 2.54 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted
    
 |  | $ | 2.69 |  |  | $ | 2.51 |  |  | $ | 1.12 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    WEIGHTED AVERAGE
    SHARES OUTSTANDING:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
    
 |  |  | 21,151 |  |  |  | 19,440 |  |  |  | 15,429 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted
    
 |  |  | 21,545 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 15,623 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    53
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    Years
    Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accum. 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Retained 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Stock 
 |  |  | Additional 
 |  |  | Earnings 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Comp. 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Common Stock |  |  | Treasury 
 |  |  | Subscription 
 |  |  | Paid-In 
 |  |  | (Accum. 
 |  |  | Deferred 
 |  |  | Income/ 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Stock |  |  | Receivable |  |  | Capital |  |  | Deficit) |  |  | Comp. |  |  | (Loss) |  |  | Total |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    BALANCE 
    December 31, 2003
    
 |  |  | 13,778,599 |  |  | $ | 138 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (430 | ) |  | $ | 76,803 |  |  | $ | (43,028 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1,323 |  |  | $ | 34,806 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of common stock
    
 |  |  | 4,072,875 |  |  |  | 41 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46,393 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46,434 |  | 
| 
    Stock subscriptions received
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 255 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 255 |  | 
| 
    Exercise of stock purchase warrants
    in connection with initial public offering
    
 |  |  | 136,023 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 464 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 465 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,125 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,125 |  | 
| 
    Comprehensive income:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17,449 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17,449 |  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation
    adjustment
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,056 |  |  |  | 2,056 |  | 
| 
    Minimum pension liability
    adjustment, net of tax
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (544 | ) |  |  | (544 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total comprehensive income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18,961 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    BALANCE 
    December 31, 2004
    
 |  |  | 17,987,497 |  |  | $ | 180 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (175 | ) |  | $ | 123,660 |  |  | $ | (15,454 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,835 |  |  | $ | 111,046 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of common stock
    
 |  |  | 2,671,229 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,710 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,736 |  | 
| 
    Exercise of common stock under
    stock option and equity incentive plans
    
 |  |  | 319,928 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,882 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,885 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of restricted stock
    
 |  |  | 167,300 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,262 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,262 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Stock subscriptions received
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 175 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 175 |  | 
| 
    Comprehensive income:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49,411 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49,411 |  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation
    adjustment
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,645 | ) |  |  | (3,645 | ) | 
| 
    Minimum pension liability
    adjustment, net of tax
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (533 | ) |  |  | (533 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total comprehensive income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45,233 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    BALANCE 
    December 31, 2005
    
 |  |  | 21,145,954 |  |  | $ | 211 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 172,514 |  |  | $ | 33,957 |  |  | $ | (3,262 | ) |  | $ | (1,343 | ) |  | $ | 202,077 |  | 
| 
    Exercise of common stock under
    stock option and equity incentive plans
    
 |  |  | 341,685 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,141 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,145 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of restricted stock
    
 |  |  | 54,328 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Effect of accounting
    change  SFAS 123(r)
    
 |  |  | (167,300 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,262 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,262 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Treasury stock purchased from
    employees at cost
    
 |  |  | (5,836 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit  equity
    transactions
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  | 
| 
    Comprehensive income:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58,050 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58,050 |  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation
    adjustment
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,874 |  |  |  | 3,874 |  | 
| 
    Minimum pension liability
    adjustment, net of tax
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (304 | ) |  |  | (304 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total comprehensive income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61,620 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjustment to initially apply FASB
    Statement No. 158, net of tax
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,472 | ) |  |  | (3,472 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    BALANCE 
    December 31, 2006
    
 |  |  | 21,368,831 |  |  | $ | 214 |  |  | $ | (115 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 174,044 |  |  | $ | 92,007 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (1,245 | ) |  | $ | 264,905 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    54
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    Years
    Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
    
 |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income
    to net cash provided by operating activities:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
    
 |  |  | 14,983 |  |  |  | 12,064 |  |  |  | 7,567 |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt
    financing costs
    
 |  |  | 895 |  |  |  | 848 |  |  |  | 522 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    
 |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | 1,031 |  | 
| 
    Shared-based compensation expense
    
 |  |  | 2,006 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,125 |  | 
| 
    Gain on sale of assets
    
 |  |  | (665 | ) |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pension and other post-retirement
    curtailment gain
    
 |  |  | (3,865 | ) |  |  | (3,097 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
    
 |  |  | 9,417 |  |  |  | 7,248 |  |  |  | 1,340 |  | 
| 
    Noncash gain on forward exchange
    contracts
    
 |  |  | (4,203 | ) |  |  | (3,793 | ) |  |  | (1,291 | ) | 
| 
    Noncash interest expense on
    subordinated debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 481 |  | 
| 
    Change in other operating items:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable
    
 |  |  | (4,369 | ) |  |  | (22,013 | ) |  |  | (4,744 | ) | 
| 
    Inventories
    
 |  |  | (16,603 | ) |  |  | (11,571 | ) |  |  | (6,243 | ) | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
    
 |  |  | (21,819 | ) |  |  | 9,958 |  |  |  | (2,360 | ) | 
| 
    Accounts payable and accrued
    liabilities
    
 |  |  | 2,213 |  |  |  | 10,145 |  |  |  | 11,383 |  | 
| 
    Other assets and liabilities
    
 |  |  | 564 |  |  |  | (6,562 | ) |  |  | (1,083 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by operating
    activities
    
 |  |  | 36,922 |  |  |  | 44,156 |  |  |  | 34,177 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and
    equipment
    
 |  |  | (19,327 | ) |  |  | (15,957 | ) |  |  | (8,907 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of
    property plant and equipment
    
 |  |  | 352 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of
    other assets
    
 |  |  | 2,032 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition and acquisition
    payments, net of cash received
    
 |  |  | (9,452 | ) |  |  | (170,851 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other assets and liabilities
    
 |  |  | (1,230 | ) |  |  | (1,761 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash (used in) investing
    activities
    
 |  |  | (27,625 | ) |  |  | (188,569 | ) |  |  | (8,907 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common
    stock
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,914 |  |  |  | 46,640 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common
    stock under equity incentive plans
    
 |  |  | 2,140 |  |  |  | 1,887 |  |  |  | 465 |  | 
| 
    Purchases of treasury stock from
    employees
    
 |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit from equity
    incentive plans
    
 |  |  | 645 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  | (74,711 | ) |  |  | (207,449 | ) |  |  | (80,575 | ) | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  | 72,398 |  |  |  | 206,778 |  |  |  | 58,092 |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  | (28,210 | ) |  |  | (238,336 | ) |  |  | (116,031 | ) | 
| 
    Long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 227,459 |  |  |  | 66,061 |  | 
| 
    Repayment of subordinated debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,112 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of
    8% senior notes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease
    obligations
    
 |  |  | (99 | ) |  |  | (46 | ) |  |  | (15 | ) | 
| 
    Debt issuance costs and other, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,340 |  |  |  | 48 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash (used in) provided by
    financing activities
    
 |  |  | (27,952 | ) |  |  | 188,547 |  |  |  | (28,427 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
    CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  | (2,165 | ) |  |  | (4,889 | ) |  |  | 1,067 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND
    CASH EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  | (20,820 | ) |  |  | 39,245 |  |  |  | (2,090 | ) | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
    
 |  |  | 40,641 |  |  |  | 1,396 |  |  |  | 3,486 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
    
 |  | $ | 19,821 |  |  | $ | 40,641 |  |  | $ | 1,396 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash paid for interest
    
 |  | $ | 13,869 |  |  | $ | 6,340 |  |  | $ | 7,564 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash paid for income taxes, net
    
 |  | $ | 29,197 |  |  | $ | 24,603 |  |  | $ | 2,767 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Unpaid purchases of property and
    equipment included in accounts payable
    
 |  | $ | 3,061 |  |  | $ | 4,712 |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    55
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    Years
    Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 
 
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries
    (CVG or the Company) design and
    manufacture suspension seat systems, interior trim systems
    (including instrument and door panels, headliners, cabinetry,
    molded products and floor systems), cab structures and
    components, mirrors, wiper systems, electronic wiring harness
    assemblies and controls and switches for the global commercial
    vehicle market, including the heavy-duty truck market, the
    construction and agriculture market and the specialty and
    military transportation markets. We have operations located in
    the United States in Arizona, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, North
    Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and
    Washington and outside of the United States in Australia,
    Belgium, China, Czech Republic, Mexico and the United Kingdom.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 2. | Significant
    Accounting Policies | 
 
    Principles of Consolidation  The accompanying
    consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our
    wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts
    and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
    Use of Estimates  The preparation of financial
    statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
    accepted in the United States of America
    (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make
    estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
    assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
    liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
    reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
    period. The more significant estimates are used for such items
    as allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves,
    warranty, pension and post retirement benefit liabilities,
    contingent liabilities, goodwill and intangible assets
    impairment and depreciable lives of property and equipment.
    Actual results may differ materially from those estimates.
 
    Cash and Cash Equivalents  Cash and cash
    equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an
    original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are
    stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
 
    Accounts Receivable  Trade accounts receivable
    are stated at current value less an allowance for doubtful
    accounts, which approximates fair value. This estimated
    allowance is based primarily on managements evaluation of
    specific balances as the balances become past due, the financial
    condition of our customers and our historical experience of
    write-offs. If not reserved through specific identification
    procedures, our general policy for uncollectible accounts is to
    reserve at a certain percentage threshold, based upon the aging
    categories of accounts receivable. Past due status is based upon
    the due date of the original amounts outstanding. When items are
    ultimately deemed uncollectible, they are charged off against
    the reserve previously established in the allowance for doubtful
    accounts.
 
    Inventories  We maintain our inventory
    primarily for the manufacture of goods for sale to our
    customers. Inventory is composed of three categories: Raw
    Materials, Work in Process, and Finished Goods. These categories
    are generally defined as follows: Raw Materials consist of
    materials that have been acquired and are available for the
    production cycle; Work in Process is composed of materials that
    have been moved into the production process and have some
    measurable amount of labor and overhead added; Finished Goods
    are materials with added labor and overhead that have completed
    the production cycle and are awaiting sale and delivery to
    customers.
 
    Inventories are valued at the lower of
    first-in,
    first-out (FIFO) cost or market. Cost includes
    applicable material, labor and overhead. We value our finished
    goods inventory at a standard cost that is periodically adjusted
    to approximate actual cost. Inventory quantities on-hand are
    regularly reviewed, and where necessary, provisions for excess
    and obsolete inventory are recorded based primarily on our
    estimated production requirements driven by current market
    volumes. Excess and obsolete provisions may vary by product
    depending upon future potential use of the product.
    
    56
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Property, Plant and Equipment  Property, plant
    and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated
    depreciation. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is
    computed using the straight-line method over the following
    estimated useful lives:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Buildings and improvements
    
 |  |  | 15 to 40 years |  | 
| 
    Machinery and equipment
    
 |  |  | 3 to 20 years |  | 
| 
    Tools and dies
    
 |  |  | 5 years |  | 
| 
    Computer hardware and software
    
 |  |  | 3 years |  | 
 
    Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
    as incurred. Expenditures for major betterments and renewals
    that extend the useful lives of property, plant and equipment
    are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining useful lives
    of the asset. When assets are retired or sold, the cost and
    related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
    and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of
    operations. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
    straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
    improvements or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter.
    Accelerated depreciation methods are used for tax reporting
    purposes.
 
    We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
    Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
    Assets, which provides a single accounting model for
    impairment of long-lived assets. We had no impairments during
    2006, 2005, or 2004.
 
    Intangible
    Assets  Indefinite-Lived
 
    Basis
    for Accounting Treatment
 
    Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of customer
    relationships acquired in the 2005 acquisitions of Mayflower and
    Monona. We have accounted for these customer relationships as
    indefinite-live intangible assets, which we believe is
    appropriate based upon the following circumstances and
    conditions under which we operate:
 
    Sourcing,
    Barriers to Entry and Competitor Risks
 
    The customer sourcing decision for the Mayflower and Monona
    businesses is heavily predicated on price, quality, delivery and
    the overall customer relationship. Absent a significant change
    in any or all of these factors, it is unlikely that a customer
    would source production to an alternate supplier. In addition,
    the factors listed below impose a high barrier for new
    competitors to enter into this industry. Historical experience
    indicates that Mayflower and Monona have not lost any primary
    customers
    and/or
    relationships due to these factors and such loss is not
    anticipated in the foreseeable future for the following reasons:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Costs associated with setting up a new production line,
    including tooling costs, are typically cost prohibitive in a
    competitive pricing environment; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The risk associated with potential production delays and a
    disruption to the supply chain typically outweighs any potential
    economic benefit; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Significant initial outlays of capital and institutional
    production knowledge represent a significant barrier to entry.
    Due to the asset-intensive nature of the businesses, a new
    competitor would require a substantial amount of initial capital; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Changeover costs are high both from an economic and risk
    standpoint; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The highly complex nature of successfully producing electronic
    wiring harnesses and complete cab structures in accordance with
    OEM quality standards makes it difficult for a competitor to
    enter the business; and | 
    
    57
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | There is significant risk in operating the businesses as a
    result of the highly customized nature of the business. For
    example, production runs in the commercial vehicle business are
    significantly smaller and are more build to order in
    nature which requires the systems, expertise, equipment and
    logistics to be successful. | 
 
    These costs and risks are the primary prohibiting factors which
    preclude our customers from sourcing their business elsewhere at
    any given time.
 
    Duration
    and Strength of Existing Customer Relationships/Concentrations
    of Revenue
 
    Mayflower and Monona have long-standing relationships with their
    existing customers and have experienced de minimis historical
    attrition. These relationships have endured over time and
    accordingly, an assumption of prospective attrition is
    inconsistent with this historical experience and
    managements expectations. Both Mayflower and Monona have a
    limited customer base, consisting of three primary customers,
    that has existed for many years, and we had pre-existing
    long-standing relationships with the same primary customers
    prior to the acquisitions of Mayflower and Monona, which in most
    cases have exceeded a period of 40 years. We believe the
    addition of Mayflower and Monona further strengthens our
    existing customer relationships with such customers.
    Specifically:
 
    Mayflower and Mononas relationships with their
    customers key decision-making personnel are mature and
    stable.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflowers and Mononas customers typically make
    purchasing decisions through a team approach versus a single
    decision maker. Mayflower and Monona have historically
    maintained strong relationships with individuals at all levels
    of the decision making process including the engineering,
    operations and purchasing functions in order to successfully
    minimize the impact of any employee turnover at the customer
    level. | 
 
    The top three customers of Mayflower and Monona have been
    established customers for a substantial period of time.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower has had relationships with Volvo/Mack, Freightliner
    and International since 1965, 1997 and 2001, respectively. We,
    and/or our
    predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with these
    same customers since 1949, 1954 and 1950, respectively. These
    customers comprised approximately 88% and 85% of
    Mayflowers revenues for fiscal years 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Monona has had relationships with Deere & Co.,
    Caterpillar and Oshkosh since 1969, 1970 and 1985, respectively.
    We, and/or
    our predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with
    these same customers since 1987, 1958 and 1950, respectively.
    These customers comprised approximately 85% and 88% of
    Mononas revenues for fiscal years 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
 
    Valuation
    Methodology
 
    For valuation purposes, the income approach using the discounted
    cash flow method was employed for the purpose of evaluating the
    Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets.
    Under this approach, we determined that the fair value of the
    Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets at
    their dates of acquisition was $45.9 million and
    $28.9 million, respectively.
 
    Significant assumptions used in the valuation and determination
    of an indefinite useful life for these customer relationship
    intangible assets included the following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | The revenue projections that we relied upon to substantiate the
    economic consideration paid for the businesses is almost
    exclusively tied to the existing customer base. With regard to
    the valuation process, | 
    
    58
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | we projected less than 1% of total revenue in 2005 and 2006 to
    be lost due to core customer attrition and no core customer
    attrition thereafter. | 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Contributory asset charges were deducted for assets that
    contribute to income generation including: (i) net working
    capital; (ii) personal property; (iii) real property;
    (iv) tradename and trademarks; and (v) an assembled
    workforce. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The cash flows associated with the customer relationships
    acquired in the Mayflower and Monona transactions were
    discounted at a rate of return of 25.0% and 29.5%, respectively,
    which is approximately equal to the equity rate of return. | 
 
    Intangible
    Asset Impairment  Accounting Treatment
 
    If Mayflower
    and/or
    Monona were to prospectively lose any of their customers, in
    accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 16 and 17 of
    SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
    Assets, we would perform an intangible asset impairment test
    to determine the impact of the loss on the customer relationship
    intangible asset and if impairment was indicated, we would
    record an impairment loss in our consolidated statement of
    operations.
 
    Other Assets  Other assets primarily consist
    of the fair value of our foreign exchange forward contracts of
    approximately $8.5 million at December 31, 2006 and
    $4.3 million at December 31, 2005 and debt financing
    costs of approximately $4.8 million at December 31,
    2006 and approximately $6.0 million at December 31,
    2005, which are being amortized over the term of the related
    obligations.
 
    Revenue Recognition  Product revenue is
    derived from sales of our various manufactured products. Our
    revenue recognition policy is in accordance with the SECs
    SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial
    Statements, SAB No. 104, Revenue
    Recognition, and other authoritative accounting literature.
    In accordance with the provisions of such authoritative
    accounting literature, we recognize revenue when
    1) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
    2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
    3) there is a fixed or determinable price, and
    4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Our products are
    generally shipped from our facilities to our customers, which is
    when title passes to the customer for substantially all of our
    revenues.
 
    Provisions for anticipated contract losses are recognized at the
    time they become evident. In that regard, in certain instances,
    we may be committed under existing agreements to supply product
    to our customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to
    cover the cost to produce such product. In such situations, we
    record a provision for the estimated future amount of such
    losses. Such losses are recognized at the time that the loss is
    probable and reasonably estimable and are recorded at the
    minimum amount necessary to fulfill our obligations to our
    customers. We had no such recorded loss as of December 31,
    2006, and $0.1 million and $0.6 million at
    December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These amounts, as
    they relate to the year ended December 31, 2005 are
    included within accrued liabilities and other long-term
    liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
    Warranty  We are subject to warranty claims
    for products that fail to perform as expected due to design or
    manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to require their
    outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and
    bear the cost of repair or replacement of such products.
    Depending on the terms under which we supply products to our
    customers, a customer may hold us responsible for some or all of
    the repair or replacement costs of defective products, when the
    product supplied did not perform as represented. Our policy is
    to record provisions for estimated future customer warranty
    costs based on historical trends and current economic factors.
    These amounts, as they relate to the years ended
    December 31, 2006 and 2005 are
    
    59
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    included within accrued expenses in the accompanying
    consolidated balance sheets. The following presents a summary of
    the warranty provision for the years ended December 31 (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of
    the year
    
 |  | $ | 7,117 |  |  | $ | 2,408 |  | 
| 
    Increase due to acquisitions
    
 |  |  | 12 |  |  |  | 5,183 |  | 
| 
    Additional provisions recorded
    
 |  |  | 3,391 |  |  |  | 2,074 |  | 
| 
    Deduction for payments made
    
 |  |  | (5,366 | ) |  |  | (2,515 | ) | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
    
 |  |  | 43 |  |  |  | (33 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of year
    
 |  | $ | 5,197 |  |  | $ | 7,117 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Income Taxes  We account for income taxes
    following the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
    Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires recognition
    of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
    tax consequences of events that have been included in the our
    financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred
    tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
    difference between the financial statement and tax basis of
    assets and liabilities using enacted tax laws and rates.
 
    Comprehensive (Loss)  We follow the provisions
    of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
    Income, which established standards for reporting and
    display of comprehensive income and its components.
    Comprehensive income reflects the change in equity of a business
    enterprise during a period from transactions and other events
    and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive (loss)
    represents net income adjusted for foreign currency translation
    adjustments, minimum pension liability and the deferred gain
    (loss) on certain derivative instruments utilized to hedge
    certain of our interest rate exposures. In accordance with
    SFAS No. 130, we have chosen to disclose comprehensive
    (loss) in the consolidated statements of stockholders
    investment. The components of accumulated other comprehensive
    (loss) consisted of the following as of December 31 (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation
    adjustment
    
 |  | $ | 5,457 |  |  | $ | 1,583 |  | 
| 
    Pension liability
    
 |  |  | (6,702 | ) |  |  | (2,926 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | (1,245 | ) |  | $ | (1,343 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Fair Value of Financial Instruments  At
    December 31, 2006, our financial instruments consist of
    cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
    payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt, unless
    otherwise noted. The carrying value of these instruments
    approximates fair value as a result of the short duration of
    such instruments or due to the variability of the interest cost
    associated with such instruments.
 
    Concentrations of Credit Risk  Financial
    instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of
    credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and
    accounts receivable. We place our cash equivalents with high
    credit-quality financial institutions. We sell products to
    various companies throughout the world in the ordinary course of
    business. We routinely assess the financial strength of our
    customers and maintain
    
    60
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    allowances for anticipated losses. Customers that accounted for
    a significant portion of consolidated revenues for each of the
    three years ended December 31 were as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    International
    
 |  |  | 22 | % |  |  | 19 | % |  |  | 9 | % | 
| 
    PACCAR
    
 |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 28 |  | 
| 
    Freightliner
    
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  | 17 |  | 
| 
    Volvo/Mack
    
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 14 |  |  |  | 6 |  | 
| 
    Caterpillar
    
 |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  | 5 |  | 
 
    As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, receivables from these
    customers represented approximately 67% and 72% of total
    receivables, respectively.
 
    Foreign Currency Translation  Our functional
    currency is the local currency. Accordingly, all assets and
    liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated using
    exchange rates in effect at the end of the period and revenue
    and costs are translated using average exchange rates for the
    period. The related translation adjustments are reported in
    accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
    investment. Translation gains and losses arising from
    transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional
    currency of the entity involved are included in the results of
    operations.
 
    Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts 
    We use forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of our
    foreign currency transaction exposures of our United Kingdom
    operations. We estimate our projected revenues and purchases in
    certain foreign currencies or locations, and will hedge a
    portion or all of the anticipated long or short position. The
    contract duration is typically between three months and three
    years. These contracts are
    marked-to-market
    and the fair value is included in assets or liabilities in the
    accompanying consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting
    noncash gain or loss included in the accompanying consolidated
    statements of operations. We do not hold or issue foreign
    exchange options or forward contracts for trading purposes. The
    following table summarizes the notional amount of our open
    foreign exchange contracts at December 31, 2006 (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Local 
 |  |  |  |  |  | U.S. $ 
 |  | 
|  |  | Currency 
 |  |  | U.S. $ 
 |  |  | Equivalent 
 |  | 
|  |  | Amount |  |  | Equivalent |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Commitments to sell currencies:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    U.S. Dollar
    
 |  |  | (715 | ) |  | $ | (715 | ) |  | $ | (715 | ) | 
| 
    Eurodollar
    
 |  |  | 36,286 |  |  |  | 50,768 |  |  |  | 48,516 |  | 
| 
    Swedish krona
    
 |  |  | 15,000 |  |  |  | 2,194 |  |  |  | 2,197 |  | 
| 
    Japanese yen
    
 |  |  | 3,525,000 |  |  |  | 37,476 |  |  |  | 31,291 |  | 
| 
    Australian Dollar
    
 |  |  | 2,850 |  |  |  | 2,273 |  |  |  | 2,238 |  | 
 
    The difference between the U.S. $ equivalent and
    U.S. $ equivalent fair value of approximately
    $8.5 million and $4.3 million is included in other
    assets in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
    2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
    Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements  In
    February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
    Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
    Instruments  an amendment of SFAS No. 133
    and No. 140, which is effective for fiscal years
    beginning after September 15, 2006. The statement was
    issued to clarify the application of SFAS No. 133 to
    beneficial interests in securitized financial assets and to
    improve the consistency of accounting for similar financial
    instruments, regardless of the form of the instruments. We have
    evaluated the new statement and have determined that it will not
    have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position
    and results of operations.
    
    61
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156,
    Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets  an
    amendment of SFAS No. 140, which is effective for
    fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. This
    statement was issued to simplify the accounting for servicing
    rights and to reduce the volatility that results from using
    different measurement attributes. We have evaluated the new
    statement and have determined that it will not have a
    significant impact on our consolidated financial position and
    results of operations.
 
    In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48
    (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
    Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS 109, Accounting for
    Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model
    for how companies should recognize, measure, present, and
    disclose in their financial statements, uncertain tax positions
    taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under
    FIN 48, tax positions shall initially be recognized in the
    financial statements when it is more likely than not the
    position will be sustained upon examination by the tax
    authorities. Such tax positions shall initially and subsequently
    be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater
    than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with
    the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and
    all relevant facts. FIN 48 also revises disclosure
    requirements to include an annual tabular roll forward of
    unrecognized tax benefits. The provisions of this interpretation
    are required to be adopted for fiscal periods beginning after
    December 15, 2006. We will be required to apply the
    provisions of FIN 48 to all tax positions upon initial
    adoption in the first quarter 2007, with any cumulative effect
    adjustment to be recognized as an adjustment to retained
    earnings. We are currently in the process of determining the
    impact of the adoption of this authoritative guidance on our
    consolidated financial position and results of operations.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
    Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
    establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to
    U.S. GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes
    a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure
    about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is
    effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
    2007. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of
    adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on our
    consolidated financial position and results of operations.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
    Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
    Other Postretirement Plans  an amendment of FASB
    Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(r). SFAS
    No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the funded status
    of defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
    plans as an asset or liability in our consolidated balance
    sheets and to recognize changes in that funded status in the
    year in which the changes occur through accumulated other
    comprehensive income in stockholders investment.
    SFAS No. 158 also requires that, beginning in 2008,
    our assumptions used to measure our annual defined benefit
    pension and other post-retirement benefit plans be determined as
    of the balance sheet date, and all plan assets and liabilities
    be reported as of that date. Currently, the assumptions used to
    measure our annual defined benefit pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plan expenses are determined as of
    October 1 or December 31 (measurement dates) for our
    various plans, and all plan assets and liabilities are generally
    reported as of those dates. In accordance with the provisions of
    SFAS No. 158, prior year amounts have not been
    adjusted. We adopted SFAS No. 158 as of
    December 31, 2006 and recognized the funded status of our
    defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans
    in our consolidated financial statements, based upon the most
    recent valuations of our defined benefit pension and other
    post-retirement benefit obligations. The financial impact of the
    adoption increased liabilities by approximately
    $5.4 million and reduced accumulated other comprehensive
    income, a component of stockholders investment, by a net
    after-tax amount of approximately $3.5 million, based on
    our current assumptions of discount rate and return on plan
    assets. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a
    significant impact on our credit or debt ratios or financing
    covenants. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial
    statements for further information regarding the adoption of
    this authoritative literature.
 
    In September 2006, the United States Securities and Exchange
    Commission (SEC) issued SAB No. 108,
    Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
    Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year 
    
    62
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    Financial Statements. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years
    ending on or after November 15, 2006 and addresses how
    financial statement errors should be considered from a
    materiality perspective and corrected. The literature provides
    interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or
    reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in
    quantifying a current year misstatement. Historically there have
    been two common approaches used to quantify such errors:
    (i) the rollover approach, which quantifies the
    error as the amount by which the current year income statement
    is misstated, and (ii) the iron curtain
    approach, which quantifies the error as the cumulative amount by
    which the current year balance sheet is misstated. The SEC Staff
    believes that companies should quantify errors using both
    approaches and evaluate whether either of these approaches
    results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant
    quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is
    material. We have evaluated the impact of adopting the
    provisions of SAB 108 and have determined that it had no
    impact on our consolidated financial position and results of
    operations.
 
 
    On November 29, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
    common stock of C.I.E.B. for approximately $8.8 million,
    and C.I.E.B. became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of CVG.
    C.I.E.B. is a seat manufacturer primarily for the commercial bus
    and truck markets. From the date of acquisition through
    December 31, 2006, C.I.E.B. recorded revenues of
    approximately $1.0 million and operating income of
    approximately $0.1 million. The C.I.E.B. acquisition was
    financed with borrowings from our revolving credit facility. The
    operating results of C.I.E.B. have been included in our 2006
    consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
    On a pro forma basis, had the C.I.E.B. acquisition been included
    in our consolidated financial statements for the full year 2006,
    our revenues would have increased by approximately
    $9.6 million and operating income would have increased by
    approximately $1.1 million.
 
    The C.I.E.B. acquisition was accounted for by the purchase
    method of accounting. Under purchase accounting, the preliminary
    purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible
    assets and liabilities of C.I.E.B. based upon their respective
    fair values. We continue to evaluate the purchase price
    allocation, including intangible assets, contingent liabilities
    and property, plant and equipment, and expect to revise the
    purchase price allocation as better information becomes
    available. The preliminary purchase price and costs associated
    with the C.I.E.B. acquisition exceeded the preliminary fair
    value of the net assets acquired by approximately
    $5.9 million. Our valuation of goodwill as of
    December 31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Contract purchase price
    
 |  | $ | 9,332 |  | 
| 
    Working capital and other
    adjustments
    
 |  |  | (514 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Preliminary purchase price (cash
    consideration)
    
 |  |  | 8,818 |  | 
| 
    Transaction costs and other
    adjustments
    
 |  |  | 214 |  | 
| 
    Net assets at historical cost
    
 |  |  | (3,151 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Excess of purchase price over net
    assets acquired
    
 |  | $ | 5,881 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
    SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the
    preliminary purchase price as shown above is allocated to
    C.I.E.B.s tangible and intangible assets and
    
    63
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date
    of the acquisition. The preliminary purchase price allocation as
    of December 31, 2006 was as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable
    
 |  | $ | 1,834 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
    
 |  |  | 1,284 |  | 
| 
    Other current assets
    
 |  |  | 57 |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment, net
    
 |  |  | 1,797 |  | 
| 
    Goodwill and other intangibles
    
 |  |  | 5,881 |  | 
| 
    Current liabilities
    
 |  |  | (1,914 | ) | 
| 
    Other long term liabilities
    
 |  |  | (121 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net assets acquired
    
 |  | $ | 8,818 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The following pro forma information presents the result of
    operations as if the 2005 acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona,
    Cabarrus and the 2006 acquisition of C.I.E.B. had taken place at
    the beginning of each period presented below. The pro forma
    results are not necessarily indicative of the financial position
    or result of operations had the acquisitions taken place on the
    dates indicated. In addition, the pro forma results are not
    necessarily indicative of the future financial or operating
    results.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  |  | (Unaudited) |  |  | (Unaudited) |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Revenue
    
 |  | $ | 928,302 |  |  | $ | 838,545 |  | 
| 
    Operating income
    
 |  | $ | 98,543 |  |  | $ | 99,235 |  | 
| 
    Net income
    
 |  | $ | 58,420 |  |  | $ | 53,242 |  | 
| 
    Earnings Per Share:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
    
 |  | $ | 2.76 |  |  | $ | 2.74 |  | 
| 
    Diluted
    
 |  | $ | 2.71 |  |  | $ | 2.70 |  | 
 
 
    Inventories consisted of the following as of December 31
    (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Raw materials
    
 |  | $ | 61,617 |  |  | $ | 46,218 |  | 
| 
    Work in process
    
 |  |  | 14,436 |  |  |  | 12,571 |  | 
| 
    Finished goods
    
 |  |  | 17,314 |  |  |  | 13,655 |  | 
| 
    Less: excess and obsolete
    
 |  |  | (4,644 | ) |  |  | (3,391 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 88,723 |  |  | $ | 69,053 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    64
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of
    December 31 (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Compensation and benefits
    
 |  | $ | 18,277 |  |  | $ | 16,069 |  | 
| 
    Warranty costs
    
 |  |  | 5,197 |  |  |  | 7,117 |  | 
| 
    Product liability
    
 |  |  | 165 |  |  |  | 286 |  | 
| 
    Interest
    
 |  |  | 6,104 |  |  |  | 5,974 |  | 
| 
    Income and other taxes
    
 |  |  | 883 |  |  |  | 490 |  | 
| 
    Facility closure and consolidation
    costs
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,605 |  | 
| 
    Freight
    
 |  |  | 482 |  |  |  | 312 |  | 
| 
    Other
    
 |  |  | 9,862 |  |  |  | 11,130 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 40,970 |  |  | $ | 42,983 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 6. | Restructuring
    and Integration | 
 
    Restructuring  In 2000, we recorded a
    $5.6 million restructuring charge as part of our cost and
    efficiency initiatives, closing two manufacturing facilities,
    two administrative centers and reorganizing our manufacturing
    and administrative functions. Approximately $1.7 million of
    the charge was related to employee severance and associated
    benefits for the 225 terminated employees, approximately
    $2.6 million related to lease and other contractual
    commitments associated with the facilities and approximately
    $1.3 million of asset impairments related to the write-down
    of assets. All employees were terminated by 2001. The
    contractual commitments continued through mid-2005.
 
    In 2001, we continued our cost and efficiency initiatives and
    closed a third manufacturing facility. Of the total
    $0.4 million restructuring charge, approximately
    $0.1 million related to employee severance and associated
    benefits for 77 employees and approximately $0.3 million
    related to lease and other contractual commitments associated
    with the facility. All employees were terminated by 2002. As of
    December 31, 2005, we completed our restructuring
    activities as described above.
 
    A summary of these restructuring activities for the years ended
    December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Facility Exit 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | and Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Employee 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Costs |  |  | Costs |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2004
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 278 |  |  | $ | 278 |  | 
| 
    Usage/cash payments
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (278 | ) |  |  | (278 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2005
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Usage/cash payments
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2006
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Integration  In connection with the
    acquisitions of Bostrom plc and the predecessor to CVS, facility
    consolidation plans were designed and implemented to reduce the
    cost structure and to better integrate the acquired operations.
    Purchase liabilities recorded as part of the acquisitions
    included approximately $3.3 million for costs associated
    with the shutdown and consolidation of certain acquired
    facilities and severance and other contractual costs. At
    December 31, 2006, we had principally completed our actions
    under these plans,
    
    65
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    other than certain contractual commitments, which continue
    through 2008. Summarized below is the activity related to these
    actions (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Facility Exit 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | and Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Employee 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Costs |  |  | Costs |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2004
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 423 |  |  | $ | 423 |  | 
| 
    Usage/cash payments
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (106 | ) |  |  | (106 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2005
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 317 |  |  |  | 317 |  | 
| 
    Usage/cash payments
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (70 | ) |  |  | (70 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2006
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 247 |  |  | $ | 247 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    In connection with the June 8, 2005 acquisition of Monona,
    plans were established to realign certain operations in an
    effort to achieve synergies between us and Monona, including the
    closure of our Spring Green, Wisconsin operations and the
    administrative office located in Naperville, Illinois. Purchase
    liabilities recorded as part of the acquisition include
    approximately $0.9 million related to employee severance
    and associated benefits for approximately 100 employees and
    approximately $1.1 million related to facility exit,
    transition and other estimated costs. These activities were
    substantially complete as of December 31, 2006. Summarized
    below is the activity related to these actions (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Facility Exit 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | and Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Employee 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Costs |  |  | Costs |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2004
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Additional reserves
    
 |  |  | 946 |  |  |  | 1,067 |  |  |  | 2,013 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2005
    
 |  |  | 946 |  |  |  | 1,067 |  |  |  | 2,013 |  | 
| 
    Usage/cash payments
    
 |  |  | (886 | ) |  |  | (1,067 | ) |  |  | (1,953 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2006
    
 |  | $ | 60 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 60 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    Debt consisted of the following at December 31 (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Revolving credit facilities bore
    interest at a weighted average of 7.1% as of December 31,
    2006 and 6.6% as of December 31, 2005 due 2010
    
 |  | $ | 1,469 |  |  | $ | 3,446 |  | 
| 
    Term loans, with principal and
    interest payable quarterly, bore interest at a weighted average
    rate of 6.8% as of December 31, 2006 and 6.3% as of
    December 31, 2005 due 2010
    
 |  |  | 10,295 |  |  |  | 37,152 |  | 
| 
    8.0% senior notes due 2013
    
 |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  | 150,000 |  | 
| 
    Other
    
 |  |  | 350 |  |  |  | 411 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 162,114 |  |  |  | 191,009 |  | 
| 
    Less current maturities
    
 |  |  | 2,158 |  |  |  | 5,309 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 159,956 |  |  | $ | 185,700 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    66
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    Future maturities of debt as of December 31, 2006 are as
    follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Year Ending December 31,
 |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2007
    
 |  | $ | 2,158 |  | 
| 
    2008
    
 |  |  | 2,553 |  | 
| 
    2009
    
 |  |  | 2,867 |  | 
| 
    2010
    
 |  |  | 4,534 |  | 
| 
    2011
    
 |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Thereafter
    
 |  |  | 150,000 |  | 
 
    Credit Agreement  We account for amendments to
    our revolving credit facility under the provisions of EITF Issue
    No. 98-14,
    Debtors Accounting for the Changes in
    Line-of-Credit
    or Revolving-Debt Arrangements
    (EITF 98-14),
    and our term loan and 8.0% senior notes under the
    provisions of EITF Issue
    No. 96-19,
    Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
    Debt Instruments
    (EITF 96-19).
    Historically, we have periodically amended the terms of our
    revolving credit facility and term loan to increase or decrease
    the individual and collective borrowing base of the instruments
    on an as needed basis. We have not modified the terms of our
    8.0% senior notes subsequent to the original offering date.
    In connection with an amendment of our revolving credit
    facility, bank fees incurred are deferred and amortized over the
    term of the new arrangement and, if applicable, any outstanding
    deferred fees are expensed proportionately or in total, as
    appropriate per the guidance of
    EITF 98-14.
    In connection with an amendment of our term loan, under the
    terms of
    EITF 96-19,
    bank and any third-party fees are either expensed as an
    extinguishment of debt or deferred and amortized over the term
    of the agreement based upon whether or not the old and new debt
    instruments are substantially different.
 
    In connection with our August 2004 initial public offering
    (IPO), we entered into a $105.0 million senior
    credit agreement, consisting of a $40.0 million revolving
    credit facility and a $65.0 million term loan. We used
    borrowings under the term loan, together with proceeds of the
    IPO to repay all amounts outstanding under our then-existing
    senior credit agreement and our then-existing subordinated
    indebtedness. In connection with this senior credit agreement,
    we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of
    approximately $1.6 million, relating to outstanding
    deferred fees from our prior debt agreements.
 
    In connection with the February 2005 acquisition of Mayflower,
    we amended our senior credit agreement to increase the revolving
    credit facility from approximately $40.0 million to
    $75.0 million and the term loan from approximately
    $65.0 million to $145.0 million. We used borrowings of
    approximately $106.4 million under our amended senior
    credit agreement to fund substantially all of the purchase price
    of the Mayflower acquisition. The revolving credit facility is
    available until January 31, 2010 and the term loan is due
    and payable on December 31, 2010. In connection with this
    change in our senior credit agreement, we incurred bank fees
    totaling approximately $1.7 million that were deferred and
    are being amortized over the term of the agreement (until 2010).
 
    In connection with the June 2005 acquisition of Monona, we
    amended our senior credit agreement to increase the revolving
    credit facility from approximately $75.0 million to
    $100.0 million. We used borrowings of approximately
    $58.0 million under our amended senior credit agreement to
    fund substantially all of the purchase price of the Monona
    acquisition. The revolving credit facility is available until
    January 31, 2010 and the term loan is due and payable on
    December 31, 2010. This amendment increased certain baskets
    in the lien, investments and asset disposition covenants to
    reflect our increased size as a result of the Mayflower and
    Monona acquisitions. In connection with this change in our
    senior credit agreement, we incurred bank fees totaling
    approximately $0.4 million that were deferred and are being
    amortized over the term of the agreement (until 2010).
    
    67
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    In connection with the July 2005 secondary public equity
    offering and private offering of $150.0 million aggregate
    principal amount of 8.0% senior notes due 2013, we entered
    into additional amendments to the senior credit agreement that
    provided for, among other things, the occurrence of these
    offerings. The net proceeds of approximately $190.8 million
    from these offerings were primarily used to repay indebtedness
    under the senior credit agreement. Concurrent with the repayment
    of the outstanding debt, our total borrowing base under the
    amended senior credit agreement was reduced to approximately
    $140.0 million. Accordingly, we expensed $1.5 million
    of unamortized deferred financing fees as a loss on early
    extinguishment of debt. In connection with the July 2005 8.0%
    senior notes offering, we incurred third-party fees totaling
    approximately $4.3 million that were deferred and are being
    amortized over the term of the notes (until 2013).
 
    In December 2005, we amended our senior credit agreement to
    increase our annual capital expenditure limit from approximately
    $25.0 million per annum to $40.0 million per annum in
    connection with our growth and development strategy.
 
    On June 30, 2006, we repaid approximately
    $25.0 million of our U.S. dollar denominated term
    loan. The repayment of the term loan reduced the overall
    borrowing capacity on the existing senior credit agreement from
    approximately $140 to $115 million. In connection with this
    loan repayment, approximately $0.3 million of deferred
    fees, representing a proportionate amount of total deferred
    fees, were expensed as a loss on early extinguishment of debt.
 
    As of December 31, 2006, approximately $4.8 million in
    deferred fees relating to previous amendments of our senior
    credit agreement and fees related to the 8.0% senior note
    offering were outstanding and are being amortized over the life
    of the agreements.
 
    The senior credit agreement provides us with the ability to
    denominate a portion of our borrowings in foreign currencies. As
    of December 31, 2006, none of the revolving credit facility
    borrowings and none of the term loan were denominated in
    U.S. dollars, and approximately $1.5 million of the
    revolving credit facility borrowings and approximately
    $10.3 million of the term loan were denominated in British
    pounds sterling.
 
    Prior to May 2, 2005, we also had $6.5 million of
    indebtedness from borrowings financed through the issuance of
    industrial development bonds relating to our Vonore, Tennessee
    facility. These borrowings had a final maturity of
    August 1, 2006 and bore interest at a variable rate which
    was adjusted on a weekly basis by the placement agent such that
    the interest rate on the bonds was sufficient to cause the
    market value of the bonds to be equal to, as nearly as
    practicable, 100% of their principal amount. On May 2, 2005
    we redeemed these bonds for approximately $6.5 million.
 
    Terms, Covenants and Compliance Status  Our
    senior credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants,
    including limiting indebtedness, rental obligations, investments
    and cash dividends, and also requires the maintenance of certain
    financial ratios, including fixed charge coverage and funded
    debt to EBITDA as defined by our senior credit agreement. We
    were in compliance with respect to these covenants as of
    December 31, 2006. Under this agreement, borrowings bear
    interest at various rates plus a margin based on certain
    financial ratios. Borrowings under the senior credit agreement
    are secured by specifically identified assets, comprising in
    total, substantially all assets. Additionally, as of
    December 31, 2006, we had outstanding letters of credit of
    approximately $1.8 million.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 8. | Goodwill
    and Intangible Assets | 
 
    Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition purchase price
    over the fair value of net assets acquired. In July 2001, the
    FASB issued SFAS No. 141, Business
    Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
    Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires all
    business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be
    accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Under
    SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with
    indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but reviewed annually
    or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable
    intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives
    will continue to be
    
    68
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    amortized over their useful lives, but with no maximum life.
    Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on
    January 1, 2002, goodwill was being amortized on a
    straight-line basis over 40 years.
 
    We review goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
    impairment annually in the second fiscal quarter and whenever
    events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value
    may not be recoverable in accordance with
    SFAS No. 142. We review definite-lived intangible
    assets in accordance with the provisions of
    SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144, Accounting
    for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The
    provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step
    impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we
    compare the fair value of our reporting unit to our carrying
    value. Our reporting unit is consistent with the reportable
    segment identified in Note 10 to our consolidated financial
    statements contained in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006. If the fair value of
    the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
    assigned to that unit, goodwill is considered not impaired and
    we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying
    value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds
    the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the
    second step of the impairment test in order to determine the
    implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill. If the
    carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds the
    implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss
    equal to the difference. SFAS No. 142 also requires
    that the fair value of the purchased intangible assets with
    indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the carrying
    value. We estimate the fair value of these intangible assets
    using an income approach. We recognize an impairment loss when
    the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than
    the carrying value. In this regard, management considers the
    following indicators in determining if events or changes in
    circumstances have occurred indicating that the recoverability
    of the carrying amount of indefinite-lived and amortizing
    intangible assets should be assessed: (1) a significant
    decrease in the market value of an asset; (2) a significant
    change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or a
    significant physical change in an asset; (3) a significant
    adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
    could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or
    assessment by a regulator; (4) an accumulation of costs
    significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to
    acquire or construct an asset; and (5) a current period
    operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating
    or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
    demonstrates continuing losses associated with an asset used for
    the purpose of producing revenue. Our annual goodwill and
    indefinite-lived (SFAS No. 142) and definite-life
    intangible asset (SFAS No. 144) impairment
    analysis was performed during the second quarter of fiscal 2006
    and did not result in an impairment charge.
 
    Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in
    nature and involves the use of significant estimates and
    assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue
    growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected
    future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic
    and market conditions and determination of appropriate market
    comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
    believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and
    inherently uncertain. The valuation approaches we use include
    the Income Approach (the Discounted Cash Flow Method) and the
    Market Approach (the Guideline Company and Transaction Methods)
    to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit; earnings are
    emphasized in the Discounted Cash Flow, Guideline Company, and
    the Transaction Methods. In addition, these methods utilize
    market data in the derivation of a value estimate and are
    forward-looking in nature. The Discounted Cash Flow Method
    utilizes a market-derived rate of return to discount anticipated
    performance, while the Guideline Company Method and the
    Transaction Method incorporate multiples that are based on the
    markets assessment of future performance. Actual future
    results may differ materially from those estimates.
    
    69
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Principal
    Factors Contributing to the Recognition of Goodwill
 
    Mayflower:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of Mayflower and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower is the only non-captive producer of complete steel and
    aluminum truck cabs for the commercial vehicle sector in North
    America; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe the acquisition allows us to be the only supplier
    worldwide to offer complete cab systems in sequence, integrating
    interior trim and seats with the cab structure; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe the acquisition gives us a leading position in North
    American cab structures and complete cab assemblies, as well as
    full service cab and sleeper engineering and development
    capabilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower broadens our revenue base at International, Volvo/Mack
    and Freightliner and enhances our cross-selling opportunities. | 
 
    Monona:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of Monona and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Monona operates in the U.S. and Mexico which enhances our
    international footprint, solidifies our domestic footprint and
    allows for cost savings opportunities; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe Monona will enhance our ability to offer
    comprehensive cab systems to our customers and expands our
    electronic assembly capabilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Monona broadens our revenue base at Caterpillar, Oshkosh and
    Deere & Co. and enhances our cross-selling
    opportunities. | 
 
    Cabarrus:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of Cabarrus and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Cabarrus offers injection molding capabilities and expertise
    which enhances our molding and plastics product
    portfolio; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe Cabarrus offers cross-selling opportunities as well
    as the capability to in-source products for cost savings
    opportunities. | 
 
    C.I.E.B.:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of C.I.E.B. and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | C.I.E.B. provides us with a wide variety of bus and truck seats,
    complements our existing product offering and provides us with a
    well positioned platform to utilize as a building block for our
    global expansion and sourcing efforts. | 
    
    70
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Our intangible assets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 were
    comprised of the following, respectively (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Weighted- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Gross 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Amortization 
 |  |  | Carrying 
 |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  | Net Carrying 
 |  | 
|  |  | Period |  |  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Amount |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Definite-lived intangible assets:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Tradenames/Trademarks
    
 |  |  | 30 years |  |  | $ | 9,790 |  |  | $ | (589 | ) |  | $ | 9,201 |  | 
| 
    Licenses
    
 |  |  | 7 years |  |  |  | 438 |  |  |  | (251 | ) |  |  | 187 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 10,228 |  |  | $ | (840 | ) |  | $ | 9,388 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
    
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 134,766 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 134,766 |  | 
| 
    Customer relationships
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 209,566 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 209,566 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total consolidated goodwill and
    intangible assets
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 218,954 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2005 |  | 
|  |  | Weighted- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Gross 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Amortization 
 |  |  | Carrying 
 |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  | Net Carrying 
 |  | 
|  |  | Period |  |  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Amount |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Definite-lived intangible assets:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Tradenames/Trademarks
    
 |  |  | 30 years |  |  | $ | 9,790 |  |  | $ | (263 | ) |  | $ | 9,527 |  | 
| 
    Licenses
    
 |  |  | 7 years |  |  |  | 438 |  |  |  | (188 | ) |  |  | 250 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 10,228 |  |  | $ | (451 | ) |  | $ | 9,777 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
    
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 125,607 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 125,607 |  | 
| 
    Customer relationships
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 200,407 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 200,407 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total consolidated goodwill and
    intangible assets
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 210,184 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was
    approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million, for the
    fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
    The estimated intangible asset amortization expense for the five
    succeeding fiscal years ending after December 31, 2006, is
    as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    2007
    
 |  | $ | 389 |  | 
| 
    2008
    
 |  | $ | 389 |  | 
| 
    2009
    
 |  | $ | 389 |  | 
| 
    2010
    
 |  | $ | 326 |  | 
| 
    2011
    
 |  | $ | 326 |  | 
    
    71
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the fiscal
    year ended December 31, 2006, were comprised of the
    following (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2005
    
 |  | $ | 125,607 |  | 
| 
    Increase due to acquisition
    
 |  |  | 5,881 |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition adjustments
    
 |  |  | 634 |  | 
| 
    Asset sale
    
 |  |  | (357 | ) | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
    
 |  |  | 3,001 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance 
    December 31, 2006
    
 |  | $ | 134,766 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 9. | Accounting
    for Income Taxes | 
 
    Pre-tax income consisted of the following for the years ended
    December 31 (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Domestic
    
 |  | $ | 76,336 |  |  | $ | 70,673 |  |  | $ | 17,996 |  | 
| 
    Foreign
    
 |  |  | 9,459 |  |  |  | 7,876 |  |  |  | 5,934 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
    
 |  | $ | 85,795 |  |  | $ | 78,549 |  |  | $ | 23,930 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the statutory rates
    to the reported income tax provision for the years ended
    December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Federal provision at statutory rate
    
 |  | $ | 30,028 |  |  | $ | 27,492 |  |  | $ | 8,136 |  | 
| 
    U.S. tax on foreign income
    
 |  |  | 272 |  |  |  | 702 |  |  |  | 779 |  | 
| 
    Foreign provision in excess (less)
    than U.S. tax rate
    
 |  |  | (231 | ) |  |  | (242 | ) |  |  | (20 | ) | 
| 
    State taxes, net of federal benefit
    
 |  |  | 1,864 |  |  |  | 1,625 |  |  |  | 1,087 |  | 
| 
    Extraterritorial income exclusion
    
 |  |  | (2,169 | ) |  |  | (55 | ) |  |  | (37 | ) | 
| 
    Manufacturers tax credit
    deduction
    
 |  |  | (610 | ) |  |  | (420 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other
    
 |  |  | (175 | ) |  |  | 914 |  |  |  | 344 |  | 
| 
    Valuation allowance
    
 |  |  | 41 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,808 | ) | 
| 
    R&D tax credit
    
 |  |  | (1,275 | ) |  |  | (878 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provision for income taxes
    
 |  | $ | 27,745 |  |  | $ | 29,138 |  |  | $ | 6,481 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The provision for income taxes for the years ended
    December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Current
    
 |  | $ | 18,328 |  |  | $ | 21,890 |  |  | $ | 5,141 |  | 
| 
    Deferred
    
 |  |  | 9,417 |  |  |  | 7,248 |  |  |  | 1,340 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provision for income taxes
    
 |  | $ | 27,745 |  |  | $ | 29,138 |  |  | $ | 6,481 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    72
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    A summary of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of
    December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Current deferred tax assets:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable
    
 |  | $ | 1,560 |  |  | $ | 1,690 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
    
 |  |  | 2,950 |  |  |  | 1,913 |  | 
| 
    Warranty costs
    
 |  |  | 2,550 |  |  |  | 3,465 |  | 
| 
    Foreign exchange contracts
    
 |  |  | (2,947 | ) |  |  | (1,509 | ) | 
| 
    Stock options
    
 |  |  | 1,478 |  |  |  | 2,412 |  | 
| 
    Accrued benefits
    
 |  |  | 1,830 |  |  |  | 2,639 |  | 
| 
    Other accruals not currently
    deductible for tax purposes
    
 |  |  | 1,398 |  |  |  | 1,961 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net current deferred assets
    
 |  | $ | 8,819 |  |  | $ | 12,571 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncurrent deferred tax
    liabilities:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization and fixed assets
    
 |  | $ | (24,212 | ) |  | $ | (19,506 | ) | 
| 
    Pension obligation
    
 |  |  | 7,629 |  |  |  | 6,160 |  | 
| 
    Net operating loss carryforwards
    
 |  |  | 1,548 |  |  |  | 2,511 |  | 
| 
    Foreign tax credit carryforwards
    
 |  |  | 3,818 |  |  |  | 1,928 |  | 
| 
    Valuation allowance
    
 |  |  | (41 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other accruals not currently
    deductible for tax purposes
    
 |  |  | 647 |  |  |  | 105 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net noncurrent deferred tax
    (liabilities)
    
 |  | $ | (10,611 | ) |  | $ | (8,802 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately
    $2.6 million of federal and $16.5 million of state net
    operating loss carryforwards related to our
    U.S. operations. Utilization of these losses is subject to
    the tax laws of the applicable tax jurisdiction and our legal
    organizational structure, and may be limited by the ability of
    certain subsidiaries to generate taxable income in the
    associated tax jurisdiction. Our net operating loss
    carryforwards expire beginning in 2016 and continue through
    2025. The deferred income tax provision consists of the change
    in the deferred income tax assets, adjusted for the impact of
    the tax benefit on the cumulative effect of the change in
    accounting and the tax impact of certain of the other
    comprehensive income (loss) items. Deferred taxes have not been
    provided on unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries
    that arose in fiscal years ending on or before December 31,
    2006. It is not practical to determine the additional tax, if
    any, that would result from the remittance of these amounts.
 
    We operate in multiple jurisdictions and are routinely under
    audit by federal, state and international tax authorities.
    Exposures exist related to various filing positions which may
    require an extended period of time to resolve and may result in
    income tax adjustments by the taxing authorities. Reserves for
    these potential exposures have been established which represent
    managements best estimate of the probable adjustments. On
    a quarterly basis, management evaluates the reserve amounts in
    light of any additional information and adjusts the reserve
    balances as necessary to reflect the best estimate of the
    probable outcomes. Management believes that we have established
    the appropriate reserve for these estimated exposures. However,
    actual results may differ from these estimates. The resolution
    of these matters in a particular future period could have an
    impact on our consolidated statement of operations and provision
    for income taxes.
 
 
    In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
    Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
    Information, our operating components constitute a single
    operating segment due to the manner in which our key decisions
    are made as well as the manner in which our operating components
    collectively
    
    73
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    support similar markets and customers, utilize similar
    manufacturing and assembly processes and utilize the same
    centralized network of personnel.
 
    The following table presents revenues and long-lived assets for
    each of the geographic areas in which we operate (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Long-lived 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Long-lived 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Long-lived 
 |  | 
|  |  | Revenues |  |  | Assets |  |  | Revenues |  |  | Assets |  |  | Revenues |  |  | Assets |  | 
|  | 
| 
    North America
    
 |  | $ | 800,069 |  |  | $ | 81,930 |  |  | $ | 636,448 |  |  | $ | 74,633 |  |  | $ | 272,460 |  |  | $ | 26,918 |  | 
| 
    All other countries
    
 |  |  | 118,682 |  |  |  | 8,458 |  |  |  | 118,033 |  |  |  | 5,782 |  |  |  | 107,985 |  |  |  | 6,047 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  | $ | 90,388 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  |  | $ | 80,415 |  |  | $ | 380,445 |  |  | $ | 32,965 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Revenues are attributed to geographic locations based on the
    location of product production.
 
    The following is a summary composition by product category of
    our revenues (dollars in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  |  | Revenues |  |  | % |  |  | Revenues |  |  | % |  |  | Revenues |  |  | % |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Cab structures, sleeper boxes,
    body panels and structural components
    
 |  | $ | 317,682 |  |  |  | 35 |  |  | $ | 252,090 |  |  |  | 33 |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Seats and seating systems
    
 |  |  | 266,401 |  |  |  | 29 |  |  |  | 241,941 |  |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 202,469 |  |  |  | 53 |  | 
| 
    Trim systems and components
    
 |  |  | 158,707 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 133,591 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 106,172 |  |  |  | 28 |  | 
| 
    Mirrors, wipers and controls
    
 |  |  | 72,544 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 71,893 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 71,804 |  |  |  | 19 |  | 
| 
    Electronic wire harnesses and
    panel assemblies
    
 |  |  | 103,417 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 54,966 |  |  |  | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  | $ | 380,445 |  |  |  | 100 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The significant change in the 2005 product categories is
    primarily the result of the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona
    and Cabarrus.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 11. | Commitments
    and Contingencies | 
 
    Leases  We lease office and manufacturing
    space and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating lease
    agreements that require us to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes
    and other expenses in addition to annual rentals. The
    anticipated future lease costs are based in part on certain
    assumptions and we will continue to monitor these costs to
    determine if the estimates need to be revised in the future.
    Lease expense was approximately $8.7 million,
    $8.4 million and $5.6 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
    respectively. Capital lease agreements entered into by us are
    immaterial in total. Future minimum annual rental commitments at
    December 31, 2006 under these operating leases are as
    follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Year Ending December 31,
 |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2007
    
 |  | $ | 7,430 |  | 
| 
    2008
    
 |  |  | 7,365 |  | 
| 
    2009
    
 |  |  | 6,119 |  | 
| 
    2010
    
 |  |  | 5,506 |  | 
| 
    2011
    
 |  |  | 4,738 |  | 
| 
    Thereafter
    
 |  |  | 25,243 |  | 
    
    74
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    Litigation  We are subject to various legal
    actions and claims incidental to our business, including those
    arising out of alleged defects, product warranties and
    employment-related, income tax and environmental matters.
    Management believes that we maintain adequate insurance to cover
    these claims. We have established reserves for issues that are
    probable and estimatable in amounts management believes are
    adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered by
    insurance. Based upon the information available to management
    and discussions with legal counsel, it is the opinion of
    management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal
    actions and claims that are incidental to our business will not
    have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial
    position, results of operations or cash flows; however, such
    matters are subject to many uncertainties and the outcomes of
    individual matters are not predictable with assurance.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 12. | Stockholders
    Investment | 
 
    Common Stock  Our authorized capital stock
    consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock with a par
    value of $0.01 per share.
 
    Preferred Stock  Our authorized capital stock
    consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par
    value of $0.01 per share, with no shares outstanding as of
    December 31, 2006.
 
    Earnings Per Share  In accordance with
    SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, as amended,
    basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net income by
    the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
    the year. Diluted earnings per share, and all other diluted per
    share amounts presented, is determined by dividing net income by
    the weighted average number of common shares and potential
    common shares outstanding during the period as determined by the
    Treasury Stock Method, as amended, in SFAS No. 123(r).
    Potential common shares are included in the diluted earnings per
    share calculation when dilutive. Diluted earnings per share for
    years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 includes the
    effects of potential common shares consisting of common stock
    issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and for the
    year ended December 31, 2006, the effect of nonvested
    restricted stock (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net income applicable to common
    stockholders  basic and diluted
    
 |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Weighted average number of common
    shares outstanding
    
 |  |  | 21,151 |  |  |  | 19,440 |  |  |  | 15,429 |  | 
| 
    Dilutive effect of outstanding
    stock options and restricted stock grants after application of
    the treasury stock method
    
 |  |  | 394 |  |  |  | 257 |  |  |  | 194 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Dilutive shares outstanding
    
 |  |  | 21,545 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 15,623 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic earnings per share
    
 |  | $ | 2.74 |  |  | $ | 2.54 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted earning per share
    
 |  | $ | 2.69 |  |  | $ | 2.51 |  |  | $ | 1.12 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Dividends  We have not declared or paid any
    cash dividends in the past. The terms of our senior credit
    agreement restricts the payment or distribution of our cash or
    other assets, including cash dividend payments.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 13. | Share-Based
    Compensation | 
 
    Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted
    SFAS No. 123(r), Share-Based Payment, using the
    modified prospective application transition method.
    SFAS No. 123(r) eliminates the intrinsic value method
    under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
    No. 25 as an alternative method of accounting for
    share-based compensation arrangements. SFAS No. 123(r)
    also revises the fair value-based method of accounting for
    share-based payment liabilities, forfeitures and modifications
    of share-based compensation arrangements and clarifies the
    guidance of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
    Stock-Based Compensation, in several areas, including
    
    75
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    measuring fair value, classifying an award as equity or as a
    liability and attributing compensation cost to reporting
    periods. Prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 123(r),
    benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation
    costs were reported as operating cash flows.
    SFAS No. 123(r) amends SFAS No. 95,
    Statement of Cash Flows, to require that excess tax
    benefits be reported as a financing cash inflow rather than as a
    reduction of taxes paid, which is included within operating cash
    flows.
 
    We estimate our pre-tax share-based compensation expense to be
    approximately $3.0 million in 2007 based on our current
    share-based compensation arrangements. The compensation expense
    that has been charged against income for those arrangements was
    approximately $2.0 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006. The total income tax benefit recognized
    in our consolidated statement of operations for share-based
    compensation arrangements was approximately $0.7 million
    for the year ended December 31, 2006. Because we accounted
    for our share-based compensation arrangements under APB Opinion
    No. 25 prior to adopting SFAS No. 123(r), our net
    income for the year ended December 31, 2005 does not
    include any compensation expense related to these arrangements.
 
    For the year ended December 31, 2006, the adoption of
    SFAS No. 123(r) resulted in incremental share-based
    compensation expense of approximately $0.6 million. The
    incremental share-based compensation expense caused income
    before provision for income taxes to decrease for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 by approximately $0.6 million, and
    net income to decrease for the year by approximately
    $0.4 million. In addition, basic and diluted earnings per
    share decreased by $0.02 and $0.02, respectively, for the year
    ended December 31, 2006. Cash provided by operating
    activities decreased and cash provided by financing activities
    increased by approximately $347 thousand for the year ended
    December 31, 2006, related to excess tax benefits from
    share-based payment arrangements.
 
    The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
    earnings per share had we applied the fair value recognition
    provisions of SFAS No. 123(r) to awards granted under
    our amended and restated equity incentive plan prior to the
    adoption of this standard for the years ended December 31,
    2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except per share
    amounts  unaudited):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net income, as reported
    
 |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  | 
| 
    (Less): Share-based compensation
    expense determined under the the fair-value-based method for all
    awards, net of related tax effects
    
 |  |  | (390 | ) |  |  | (69 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pro forma net income
    
 |  | $ | 49,021 |  |  | $ | 17,380 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic earnings per share:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    As reported
    
 |  | $ | 2.54 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pro forma
    
 |  | $ | 2.52 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted earnings per share:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    As reported
    
 |  | $ | 2.51 |  |  | $ | 1.12 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pro forma
    
 |  | $ | 2.49 |  |  | $ | 1.11 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Stock Option Grants and Restricted Stock
    Awards  In 1998, we granted options to purchase
    57,902 shares of common stock at $9.43 per share,
    which are exercisable through December 2008. The options were
    granted at exercise prices determined to be at or above fair
    value on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2006, 28,951
    of the initially granted options have been exercised.
 
    In May 2004, we granted options to purchase 910,869 shares
    of common stock at $5.54 per share. These options have a
    ten-year term and the original terms provided for 50% of the
    options becoming exercisable
    
    76
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    ratably on June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2006. During
    June 2004, we modified the terms of these options such that they
    became 100% vested immediately.
 
    In October 2004, we granted options to purchase
    598,950 shares of common stock at $15.84 per share.
    These options have a ten-year term and vest ratably in three
    equal annual installments commencing on October 20, 2005.
    As of December 31, 2006, there was approximately
    $0.6 million of unearned compensation related to nonvested
    stock options granted in October 2004 under the amended and
    restated equity incentive plan. This expense is subject to
    future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be
    recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining period of
    10 months.
 
    In November 2005, 168,700 shares of restricted stock were
    awarded by our compensation committee under our Amended and
    Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock is a grant of
    shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
    disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
    terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
    period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
    restricted stock granted in November 2005 vest in three equal
    annual installments commencing on October 20, 2006. A
    participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
    rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
    determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2006, there was
    approximately $2.0 million of unearned compensation related
    to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2005 under the amended
    and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is subject to
    future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be
    recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining period of
    22 months.
 
    In November 2006, 207,700 shares of restricted stock were
    awarded by our compensation committee under our amended and
    restated equity incentive plan. Restricted stock is a grant of
    shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
    disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
    terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
    period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
    restricted stock granted in November 2006 vest in three equal
    annual installments commencing on October 20, 2007. A
    participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
    rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
    determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2006, there was
    approximately $4.0 million of unearned compensation related
    to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2006 under the amended
    and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is subject to
    future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be
    recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining period of
    34 months.
 
    We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the
    fair value of equity-based stock option grants with the
    following weighted-average assumptions:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2004 Stock 
 |  | 
|  |  | Option Grants |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Weighted-average fair value of
    option and restricted stock grants
    
 |  | $ | 3.34 |  | 
| 
    Risk-free interest rate
    
 |  |  | 4.50 | % | 
| 
    Expected volatility
    
 |  |  | 23.12 | % | 
| 
    Expected life in months
    
 |  |  | 36 |  | 
 
    We currently estimate the forfeiture rate for our October 2004
    stock option grants, November 2005 restricted stock awards and
    November 2006 restricted stock awards at 12.2%, 13.2% and 3.9%,
    respectively, for all participants of each plan.
    
    77
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    A summary of the status of our stock options as of
    December 31, 2006 and changes during the twelve-month
    period ending December 31, 2006 is presented below:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted-Average 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Remaining 
 |  |  | Aggregate 
 |  | 
|  |  | Options 
 |  |  | Weighted-Average 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  | Intrinsic 
 |  | 
| 
    Stock Options
 |  | (000s) |  |  | Exercise Price |  |  | Life (Years) |  |  | Value (000s) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Outstanding at December 31,
    2005
    
 |  |  | 1,219 |  |  | $ | 10.45 |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Granted
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercised
    
 |  |  | (342 | ) |  |  | 6.30 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,072 |  | 
| 
    Forfeited
    
 |  |  | (29 | ) |  |  | 15.84 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Outstanding at December 31,
    2006
    
 |  |  | 848 |  |  | $ | 11.94 |  |  |  | 7.5 |  |  | $ | 8,588 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercisable at December 31,
    2006
    
 |  |  | 673 |  |  | $ | 10.92 |  |  |  | 7.4 |  |  | $ | 6,878 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Nonvested, expected to vest at
    December 31, 2006
    
 |  |  | 158 |  |  | $ | 15.84 |  |  |  | 7.8 |  |  | $ | 837 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The following table summarizes information about the nonvested
    stock options and restricted stock grants as of
    December 31, 2006:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nonvested Stock Options |  |  | Nonvested Restricted Stock |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted-Average 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted-Average 
 |  | 
|  |  | Options 
 |  |  | Grant-Date 
 |  |  | Shares 
 |  |  | Grant-Date 
 |  | 
|  |  | (000s) |  |  | Fair Value |  |  | (000s) |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Nonvested at December 31, 2005
    
 |  |  | 380 |  |  | $ | 3.34 |  |  |  | 167 |  |  | $ | 19.50 |  | 
| 
    Granted
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 208 |  |  |  | 20.59 |  | 
| 
    Vested
    
 |  |  | (176 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (54 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited
    
 |  |  | (29 | ) |  |  | 3.34 |  |  |  | (12 | ) |  |  | 19.50 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Nonvested at December 31, 2006
    
 |  |  | 175 |  |  | $ | 3.34 |  |  |  | 309 |  |  | $ | 20.21 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    We expect employees to surrender approximately six thousand
    shares of our common stock in connection with the vesting of
    restricted stock during 2007 to satisfy income tax withholding
    obligations.
 
    As of December 31, 2006, a total of 101,283 shares
    were available from the original 1.0 million shares
    authorized for award under our Amended and Restated Equity
    Incentive Plan, including cumulative forfeitures.
 
    Repurchase of Common Stock  In addition,
    during 2004, we repurchased 50,874 shares of common stock
    from certain stockholders at an average price of $4.78 per
    share. During 2005, we did not repurchase any shares of common
    stock.
 
    The 50,874 shares repurchased during 2004 were stated
    separately in our consolidated statements of stockholders
    investment included in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2004. However, we netted
    this amount against the issuance of common stock line item in
    our consolidated statements of stockholders investment
    included in our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2005 to avoid potential
    investor confusion with the implication of a share repurchase of
    private company stock versus such a transaction with public
    company stock.
 
    These shares were originally purchased in 1997 by certain
    members of management when our predecessor was formed; the
    shares were fully vested at the time of purchase. In connection
    with the issuance of the shares, we entered into a stockholder
    agreement with certain members of management whereby each
    management stockholder that was party to the agreement was
    required to sell their stock, at book value, to either us or
    certain of our non-management stockholders in the event their
    employment was terminated for any
    
    78
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    reason at any time prior to an initial public offering. During
    the second quarter of 2004, certain management employees
    terminated their employment with us, and their shares (50,874 in
    total) were repurchased by us at book value in accordance with
    the terms of the stockholders agreement. There was no
    compensation expense recorded in connection with these
    transactions.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 14. | Defined
    Contribution Plans, Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
    Plans | 
 
    Defined Contribution Plans  We sponsor various
    401(k) employee savings plans covering all eligible employees,
    as defined. Eligible employees can contribute on a pre-tax basis
    to the plan. In accordance with the terms of the 401(k) plans,
    we elect to match a certain percentage of the participants
    contributions to the plans, as defined. We recognized expense
    associated with these plans of approximately $1.5 million,
    $1.2 million and $463,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
    respectively.
 
    Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
    Plans  We sponsor pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans that cover certain hourly and
    salaried employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Our
    policy is to make annual contributions to the plans to fund the
    normal cost as required by local regulations. In addition, we
    have a post-retirement benefit plan for certain
    U.S. operations, retirees and their dependents.
 
    The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
    Act of 2003 (Act) introduced a prescription drug benefit under
    Medicare Part D as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of
    retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is
    at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The
    effect of the Medicare prescription drug subsidy was an
    immaterial component of our net periodic post-retirement benefit
    cost for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
    Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
    Other Postretirement Plans  an amendment of FASB
    Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(r).
    SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the
    funded status of defined benefit pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or liability in our
    consolidated balance sheet and to recognize changes in that
    funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
    accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
    investment. SFAS No. 158 also requires that, beginning
    in 2008, our assumptions used to measure our annual defined
    benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans be
    determined as of the balance sheet date, and all plan assets and
    liabilities be reported as of that date. Currently, the
    assumptions used to measure our annual defined benefit pension
    and other post-retirement benefit plan expenses are determined
    as of October 1 or December 31 (measurement dates) for
    our various plans, and all plan assets and liabilities are
    generally reported as of those dates. In accordance with the
    provisions of SFAS No. 158, prior year amounts have
    not been adjusted.
 
    The following illustrates the incremental effect of applying
    SFAS No. 158 on individual line items on our
    consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Before 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Application 
 |  |  |  |  |  | After Application 
 |  | 
|  |  | of SFAS No. 158 |  |  | Adjustments |  |  | of SFAS No. 158 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Accrued liabilities
    
 |  | $ | 40,678 |  |  | $ | 292 |  |  | $ | 40,970 |  | 
| 
    Liability for pension benefits
    
 |  | $ | 17,106 |  |  | $ | 5,082 |  |  | $ | 22,188 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
    
 |  | $ | 12,513 |  |  | $ | (1,902 | ) |  | $ | 10,611 |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities
    
 |  | $ | 320,543 |  |  | $ | 5,374 |  |  | $ | 325,917 |  | 
| 
    Accumulated other comprehensive
    loss
    
 |  | $ | 2,227 |  |  | $ | (3,472 | ) |  | $ | (1,245 | ) | 
| 
    Total stockholders investment
    
 |  | $ | 268,377 |  |  | $ | (3,472 | ) |  | $ | 264,905 |  | 
    
    79
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    The change in benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
    as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
    consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension
    Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Change in benefit
    obligation:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefit obligation 
    Beginning of year
    
 |  | $ | 30,664 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 39,850 |  |  | $ | 37,576 |  |  | $ | 4,398 |  |  | $ | 687 |  | 
| 
    Service cost
    
 |  |  | 628 |  |  |  | 952 |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 991 |  |  |  | 61 |  |  |  | 233 |  | 
| 
    Interest cost
    
 |  |  | 1,684 |  |  |  | 1,439 |  |  |  | 2,253 |  |  |  | 1,862 |  |  |  | 164 |  |  |  | 362 |  | 
| 
    Plan participants
    contributions
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 174 |  |  |  | 605 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Plan amendments
    
 |  |  | 59 |  |  |  | 61 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 206 |  |  |  | (447 | ) | 
| 
    Curtailment (gain)
    
 |  |  | (2,193 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (776 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,057 | ) |  |  | (3,097 | ) | 
| 
    Acquisitions/divestitures
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,567 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,454 |  | 
| 
    Benefits paid
    
 |  |  | (1,001 | ) |  |  | (538 | ) |  |  | (1,360 | ) |  |  | (1,140 | ) |  |  | (184 | ) |  |  | (211 | ) | 
| 
    Actuarial (gain) loss
    
 |  |  | 781 |  |  |  | (817 | ) |  |  | 1,189 |  |  |  | 3,914 |  |  |  | (141 | ) |  |  | 417 |  | 
| 
    Exchange rate changes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,474 |  |  |  | (3,958 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefit obligation at end of year
    
 |  |  | 30,622 |  |  |  | 30,664 |  |  |  | 47,067 |  |  |  | 39,850 |  |  |  | 2,447 |  |  |  | 4,398 |  | 
| 
    Change in plan
    assets:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fair value of plan
    assets  Beginning of year
    
 |  |  | 19,722 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,844 |  |  |  | 28,397 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Actual return on plan assets
    
 |  |  | 1,061 |  |  |  | 489 |  |  |  | 3,278 |  |  |  | 3,728 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Acquisitions/divestitures
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18,832 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Employer contributions
    
 |  |  | 806 |  |  |  | 939 |  |  |  | 1,033 |  |  |  | 1,437 |  |  |  | 240 |  |  |  | 211 |  | 
| 
    Plan participants
    contributions
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 174 |  |  |  | 605 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefits paid
    
 |  |  | (1,001 | ) |  |  | (538 | ) |  |  | (1,360 | ) |  |  | (1,140 | ) |  |  | (184 | ) |  |  | (211 | ) | 
| 
    Risk benefit insurance premium
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (55 | ) |  |  | (191 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exchange rate changes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,099 |  |  |  | (2,992 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fair value of plan assets at end
    of year
    
 |  |  | 20,588 |  |  |  | 19,722 |  |  |  | 37,013 |  |  |  | 29,844 |  |  |  | 56 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Funded status
    
 |  |  | (10,034 | ) |  |  | (10,942 | ) |  |  | (10,054 | ) |  |  | (10,006 | ) |  |  | (2,391 | ) |  |  | (4,398 | ) | 
| 
    Unrecognized net (gain) loss
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (81 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,341 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 
| 
    Unrecognized prior service cost
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 138 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net (accrued) amount recognized
    
 |  | $ | (10,034 | ) |  | $ | (11,023 | ) |  | $ | (10,054 | ) |  | $ | (527 | ) |  | $ | (2,391 | ) |  | $ | (4,343 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    At December 31, 2005, we recorded a minimum pension
    liability of approximately $5.3 million which is included
    in liability for pension benefits and accumulated other
    comprehensive loss, net of tax, in the consolidated financial
    statements.
    
    80
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at
    December 31 consist of (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Non-U.S. 
 |  |  | Other Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Current liabilities
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 292 |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Noncurrent liabilities
    
 |  |  | 10,034 |  |  |  | 11,023 |  |  |  | 10,054 |  |  |  | 527 |  |  |  | 2,099 |  |  |  | 4,343 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net amount recognized
    
 |  | $ | 10,034 |  |  | $ | 11,023 |  |  | $ | 10,054 |  |  | $ | 527 |  |  | $ | 2,391 |  |  | $ | 4,343 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Defined benefits plans with a projected benefit obligation and
    accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at
    December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension
    Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Projected benefit obligation
    
 |  | $ | 30,622 |  |  | $ | 30,664 |  |  | $ | 47,067 |  |  | $ | 39,850 |  | 
| 
    Accumulated benefit obligation
    
 |  | $ | 30,622 |  |  | $ | 28,516 |  |  | $ | 47,067 |  |  | $ | 35,154 |  | 
| 
    Fair value of plan assets
    
 |  | $ | 20,588 |  |  | $ | 19,722 |  |  | $ | 37,013 |  |  | $ | 29,844 |  | 
 
    The components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
    December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension
    Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Service cost
    
 |  | $ | 628 |  |  | $ | 952 |  |  | $ | 263 |  |  | $ | 991 |  |  | $ | 1,213 |  |  | $ | 61 |  |  | $ | 233 |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Interest cost
    
 |  |  | 1,684 |  |  |  | 1,439 |  |  |  | 2,253 |  |  |  | 1,862 |  |  |  | 1,879 |  |  |  | 164 |  |  |  | 362 |  |  |  | 39 |  | 
| 
    Expected return on plan assets
    
 |  |  | (1,649 | ) |  |  | (1,419 | ) |  |  | (2,030 | ) |  |  | (1,931 | ) |  |  | (1,879 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization of prior service costs
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Recognized actuarial loss
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 334 |  |  |  | 266 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Curtailment loss
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 151 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net periodic benefit cost
    
 |  | $ | 663 |  |  | $ | 972 |  |  | $ | 906 |  |  | $ | 1,273 |  |  | $ | 1,498 |  |  | $ | 225 |  |  | $ | 597 |  |  | $ | 39 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
    obligations at December 31 are as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Other Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension
    Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Discount rate
    
 |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 5.50-5.75 | % |  |  | 5.75 | % | 
| 
    Rate of compensation increase
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.50 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.30 | % |  |  | 3.20 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
    benefit cost at December 31 are as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Other Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension
    Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Discount rate
    
 |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 5.66 | % |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 5.50-5.75 | % |  |  | 5.66-5.75 | % |  |  | 6.25 | % | 
| 
    Expected return on plan assets
    
 |  |  | 8.50 | % |  |  | 8.50 | % |  |  | 6.00 | % |  |  | 7.50 | % |  |  | 7.50 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Rate of compensation increase
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.50 | % |  |  | 3.30 | % |  |  | 3.20 | % |  |  | 3.00 | % |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    81
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    We employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of
    equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the
    long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. The
    intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by
    outperforming plan liabilities over the long run. Risk tolerance
    is established through careful consideration of plan
    liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial
    condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend
    of equity and fixed income investments. Furthermore, equity
    investments are diversified across U.S. and
    non-U.S. stocks
    as well as growth, value and small and large capitalizations.
    Other assets such as real estate, private equity and hedge funds
    are used judiciously to enhance long-term returns while
    improving portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to
    gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however,
    derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the
    market value of the underlying investments. Investment risk is
    measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual
    liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies and
    quarterly investment portfolio reviews. We expect to contribute
    $2.7 million to our pension plans and $0.0 million to
    our other post-retirement benefit plans in 2007.
 
    Our current investment allocation target for our pension plans
    for 2007 and our weighted-average asset allocations of our
    pension assets for the years ended December 31, by asset
    category, are as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Target Allocation |  |  | Pension Plans |  | 
|  |  | U.S. |  |  | Non-U.S. |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Equity securities
    
 |  |  | 52 | % |  |  | 62 | % |  |  | 58 | % |  |  | 59 | % | 
| 
    Debt securities
    
 |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 28 |  | 
| 
    Other
    
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 13 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % | 
 
    For measurement purposes, a 10.0% annual rate of increase in the
    per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for
    2006. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% through
    2011 and remain constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost
    trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts
    reported for other post-retirement benefit plans.
 
    Differences in the ultimate health care cost trend rates within
    the range indicated below would have had the following impact on
    2006 other post-retirement benefit results (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  | 
|  |  | Point Increase |  |  | Point Decrease |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Increase (Decrease) from change in
    health care cost trend rates
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other post-retirement benefit
    expense
    
 |  | $ | 20 |  |  | $ | (19 | ) | 
| 
    Other post-retirement benefit
    liability
    
 |  | $ | 102 |  |  | $ | (95 | ) | 
 
    The following table summarizes our expected future benefit
    payments of our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans
    (in thousands):
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Other Post- 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Retirement 
 |  | 
| 
    Year
 |  | Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2007
    
 |  | $ | 1,987 |  |  | $ | 292 |  | 
| 
    2008
    
 |  | $ | 2,156 |  |  | $ | 295 |  | 
| 
    2009
    
 |  | $ | 2,390 |  |  | $ | 321 |  | 
| 
    2010
    
 |  | $ | 2,650 |  |  | $ | 372 |  | 
| 
    2011
    
 |  | $ | 2,891 |  |  | $ | 350 |  | 
| 
    2012 to 2016
    
 |  | $ | 20,541 |  |  | $ | 674 |  | 
 
    During 2005, we elected to freeze the pension plan for Mayflower
    salaried employees. This action was undertaken by us in an
    effort to minimize future liabilities and as part of the
    integration process.
    
    82
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    During 2005, we also elected to terminate the Mayflower medical
    and dental post-retirement plan. This action was undertaken by
    us in an effort to minimize future liabilities and as part of
    the integration process. As a result of this action, we recorded
    a curtailment gain of approximately $3.1 million which is
    included in the consolidated financial statements of operations
    for the year ending December 31, 2005.
 
    During 2006, we elected to freeze our U.K. pension scheme. This
    action was undertaken by us in an effort to minimize future
    liabilities.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 15. | Related
    Party Transactions | 
 
    We entered into the following related party transactions during
    the three years ended December 31, 2006:
 
    On January 31, 2005, we entered into an advisory agreement
    with Hidden Creek Partners, LLC (HCP), (formerly
    Hidden Creek Industries (HCI)), pursuant to which
    HCP agreed to assist us in financing activities, strategic
    initiatives and acquisitions in exchange for an annual fee. In
    addition, the Company agreed to pay HCP a transaction fee for
    services rendered that relate to transactions we may enter into
    from time to time, in an amount that is negotiated between our
    Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer and approved
    by our Board of Directors. All of the principals of HCP are
    employees and managing directors of Thayer Capital Partners
    (Thayer). Scott D. Rued, our Chairman, is a managing
    partner of Thayer and Richard A. Snell, a member of our Board of
    Directors and our Compensation Committee Chairman, is an
    operating partner of Thayer. Thayer Capital, Scott D. Rued and
    Richard A. Snell are neither a party to, nor have any direct or
    indirect financial interest in the advisory agreement between us
    and HCP. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we
    made payments under these arrangements of approximately
    $0.3 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In 2004,
    we paid HCI, approximately $1.0 million for financing and
    acquisition-related services.
 
    On May 1, 2004, we entered into a Product Sourcing
    Assistance Agreement with Baird Asia Limited (BAL),
    an affiliate of Baird Capital Partners III L.P. Pursuant to
    the agreement, BAL assisted us in procuring materials and parts
    from Asia, including the countries of China, Malaysia, Hong Kong
    and Taiwan. BAL received as compensation a percentage of the
    price of the materials and parts supplied to us, of at least 2%
    of the price but not exceeding 10% of the price, to be
    determined on a
    case-by-case
    basis. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we
    incurred expenses of approximately $3.1 million and
    $0.2 million, respectively, for the value of goods and
    services purchased under this agreement. In connection with the
    sale of stock during 2005, BAL was no longer a related party as
    of and subsequent to December 31, 2005.
 
    In 2001, Onex acquired a one-third interest in our
    $66.0 million senior credit facility. Total interest
    expense related to the portion of this senior credit facility
    owned by Onex was approximately $0.5 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2004. No payments were made during 2005,
    and in connection with the sale of stock during 2005, Onex was
    no longer a related party as of and subsequent to
    December 31, 2005.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 16. | Consolidating
    Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information | 
 
    The following consolidating financial information presents
    balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flow
    information related to our business. Each guarantor, as defined,
    is a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary and has fully
    and unconditionally guaranteed the subordinated notes issued by
    us, on a joint and several basis. Separate financial statements
    and other disclosures concerning the guarantors have not been
    presented because management believes that such information is
    not material to investors.
 
    The parent company includes all of the wholly-owned subsidiaries
    accounted for under the equity method. The guarantor and
    non-guarantor companies include the consolidated financial
    results of their wholly-owned subsidiaries accounted for under
    the equity method. All applicable corporate expenses have been
    allocated appropriately among the guarantor and non-guarantor
    subsidiaries.
    
    83
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
    As of December 31, 2006
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    CURRENT ASSETS:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 18,268 |  |  | $ | 1,553 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 19,821 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 148,244 |  |  |  | 31,356 |  |  |  | (56,129 | ) |  |  | 123,471 |  | 
| 
    Inventories, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66,337 |  |  |  | 22,610 |  |  |  | (224 | ) |  |  | 88,723 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,984 |  |  |  | 5,819 |  |  |  | 11,469 |  |  |  | 24,272 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11,570 |  |  |  | (2,751 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,819 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 251,403 |  |  |  | 58,587 |  |  |  | (44,884 | ) |  |  | 265,106 |  | 
| 
    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81,930 |  |  |  | 8,458 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90,388 |  | 
| 
    INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
    
 |  |  | 400,817 |  |  |  | 10,602 |  |  |  | 11,987 |  |  |  | (423,406 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    GOODWILL
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 104,033 |  |  |  | 30,733 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 134,766 |  | 
| 
    INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84,188 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84,188 |  | 
| 
    OTHER ASSETS, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,761 |  |  |  | 8,613 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,374 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,624 |  |  |  | 3,323 |  |  |  | (11,947 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL ASSETS
    
 |  | $ | 400,817 |  |  | $ | 548,541 |  |  | $ | 121,701 |  |  | $ | (480,237 | ) |  | $ | 590,822 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    LIABILITIES AND
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 | 
| 
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current maturities of long-term
    debt
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,158 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,158 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 123,398 |  |  |  | 19,341 |  |  |  | (56,129 | ) |  |  | 86,610 |  | 
| 
    Accrued liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,661 |  |  |  | 3,840 |  |  |  | 11,469 |  |  |  | 40,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 151,217 |  |  |  | 23,181 |  |  |  | (44,660 | ) |  |  | 129,738 |  | 
| 
    LONG-TERM DEBT, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 148,156 |  |  |  | 11,800 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 159,956 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,374 |  |  |  | (816 | ) |  |  | (11,947 | ) |  |  | 10,611 |  | 
| 
    OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15,556 |  |  |  | 10,056 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,612 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 338,303 |  |  |  | 44,221 |  |  |  | (56,607 | ) |  |  | 325,917 |  | 
| 
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
    
 |  |  | 400,817 |  |  |  | 210,238 |  |  |  | 77,480 |  |  |  | (423,630 | ) |  |  | 264,905 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
    
 |  | $ | 400,817 |  |  | $ | 548,541 |  |  | $ | 121,701 |  |  | $ | (480,237 | ) |  | $ | 590,822 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    84
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 789,952 |  |  | $ | 134,978 |  |  | $ | (6,179 | ) |  | $ | 918,751 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 661,519 |  |  |  | 112,738 |  |  |  | (5,344 | ) |  |  | 768,913 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 128,433 |  |  |  | 22,240 |  |  |  | (835 | ) |  |  | 149,838 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND
    ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39,487 |  |  |  | 13,153 |  |  |  | (690 | ) |  |  | 51,950 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 414 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 414 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88,532 |  |  |  | 9,087 |  |  |  | (145 | ) |  |  | 97,474 |  | 
| 
    OTHER INCOME
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 755 |  |  |  | (4,223 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,468 | ) | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,963 |  |  |  | (134 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,829 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF
    DEBT
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 282 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 318 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income Before Provision for Income
    Taxes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72,532 |  |  |  | 13,408 |  |  |  | (145 | ) |  |  | 85,795 |  | 
| 
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24,002 |  |  |  | 3,743 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27,745 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCOME
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 48,530 |  |  | $ | 9,665 |  |  | $ | (145 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    85
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 48,530 |  |  | $ | 9,665 |  |  | $ | (145 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income
    to net cash provided by operating activities:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,906 |  |  |  | 2,077 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,983 |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt
    financing costs
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 855 |  |  |  | 40 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 895 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 282 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 318 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on sale of assets
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (693 | ) |  |  | 28 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (665 | ) | 
| 
    Pension and post-retirement
    curtailment (gain) loss
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,007 | ) |  |  | 142 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,865 | ) | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,616 |  |  |  | 1,801 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,417 |  | 
| 
    Noncash gain on forward exchange
    contracts
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,203 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,203 | ) | 
| 
    Change in other operating items
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (37,477 | ) |  |  | (2,682 | ) |  |  | 145 |  |  |  | (40,014 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by operating
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30,018 |  |  |  | 6,904 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36,922 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and
    equipment
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17,070 | ) |  |  | (2,257 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (19,327 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of
    property, plant and equipment
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 332 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 352 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of
    other assets
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,032 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,032 |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition and acquisitions
    payments, net of cash received
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (634 | ) |  |  | (8,818 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9,452 | ) | 
| 
    Other asset and liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (11,080 | ) |  |  | (10,273 | ) |  |  | 20,123 |  |  |  | (1,230 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash used in investing
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26,420 | ) |  |  | (21,328 | ) |  |  | 20,123 |  |  |  | (27,625 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common
    stock under equity incentive plans
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,140 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,140 |  | 
| 
    Purchases of treasury stock from
    employees
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit from equity
    incentive plans
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (61,300 | ) |  |  | (13,411 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (74,711 | ) | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61,300 |  |  |  | 11,098 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72,398 |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26,590 | ) |  |  | (1,620 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (28,210 | ) | 
| 
    Long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease
    obligations
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (98 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (99 | ) | 
| 
    Other, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20,123 |  |  |  | (20,123 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash used in financing
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (24,018 | ) |  |  | 16,189 |  |  |  | (20,123 | ) |  |  | (27,952 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
    CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (465 | ) |  |  | (1,700 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,165 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
    EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (20,885 | ) |  |  | 65 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (20,820 | ) | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39,153 |  |  |  | 1,488 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40,641 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 18,268 |  |  | $ | 1,553 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 19,821 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    86
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
    As of December 31, 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    CURRENT ASSETS:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 39,153 |  |  | $ | 1,488 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 40,641 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 144,793 |  |  |  | 25,657 |  |  |  | (56,334 | ) |  |  | 114,116 |  | 
| 
    Inventories, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50,953 |  |  |  | 18,179 |  |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | 69,053 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (540 | ) |  |  | 2,484 |  |  |  | 2,780 |  |  |  | 4,724 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13,551 |  |  |  | (980 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,571 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 247,910 |  |  |  | 46,828 |  |  |  | (53,633 | ) |  |  | 241,105 |  | 
| 
    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,633 |  |  |  | 5,782 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80,415 |  | 
| 
    INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
    
 |  |  | 328,815 |  |  |  | 752 |  |  |  | 1,715 |  |  |  | (331,282 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    GOODWILL
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 103,758 |  |  |  | 21,849 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 125,607 |  | 
| 
    INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84,577 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84,577 |  | 
| 
    OTHER ASSETS, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,692 |  |  |  | 4,487 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,179 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,837 |  |  |  | 1,818 |  |  |  | (12,655 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL ASSETS
    
 |  | $ | 328,815 |  |  | $ | 530,159 |  |  | $ | 82,479 |  |  | $ | (397,570 | ) |  | $ | 543,883 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    LIABILITIES AND
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 | 
| 
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current maturities of long-term
    debt
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 5,309 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 5,309 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 115,704 |  |  |  | 14,339 |  |  |  | (56,334 | ) |  |  | 73,709 |  | 
| 
    Accrued liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37,124 |  |  |  | 3,079 |  |  |  | 2,780 |  |  |  | 42,983 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 158,137 |  |  |  | 17,418 |  |  |  | (53,554 | ) |  |  | 122,001 |  | 
| 
    LONG-TERM DEBT, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 171,693 |  |  |  | 14,007 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 185,700 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22,273 |  |  |  | (816 | ) |  |  | (12,655 | ) |  |  | 8,802 |  | 
| 
    OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19,994 |  |  |  | 5,309 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,303 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 372,097 |  |  |  | 35,918 |  |  |  | (66,209 | ) |  |  | 341,806 |  | 
| 
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
    
 |  |  | 328,815 |  |  |  | 158,062 |  |  |  | 46,561 |  |  |  | (331,361 | ) |  |  | 202,077 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
    
 |  | $ | 328,815 |  |  | $ | 530,159 |  |  | $ | 82,479 |  |  | $ | (397,570 | ) |  | $ | 543,883 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    87
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 633,725 |  |  | $ | 124,751 |  |  | $ | (3,995 | ) |  | $ | 754,481 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 520,209 |  |  |  | 103,366 |  |  |  | (3,544 | ) |  |  | 620,031 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 113,516 |  |  |  | 21,385 |  |  |  | (451 | ) |  |  | 134,450 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND
    ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32,909 |  |  |  | 12,027 |  |  |  | (372 | ) |  |  | 44,564 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 358 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 358 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80,249 |  |  |  | 9,358 |  |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | 89,528 |  | 
| 
    OTHER INCOME
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (3,735 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,741 | ) | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11,742 |  |  |  | 1,453 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13,195 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF
    DEBT
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,525 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income Before Provision for Income
    Taxes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66,988 |  |  |  | 11,640 |  |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | 78,549 |  | 
| 
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,199 |  |  |  | 3,939 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,138 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCOME
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 41,789 |  |  | $ | 7,701 |  |  | $ | (79 | ) |  | $ | 49,411 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    88
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 41,789 |  |  | $ | 7,701 |  |  | $ | (79 | ) |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income
    to net cash provided by operating activities:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,300 |  |  |  | 1,764 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,064 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt
    financing costs
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 98 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 848 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,354 |  |  |  | 171 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on sale of assets
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pension and post-retirement
    curtailment (gain) loss
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,097 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,097 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,134 |  |  |  | 2,114 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,248 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncash gain on forward exchange
    contracts
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,793 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,793 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Change in other operating items
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,236 |  |  |  | (26,358 | ) |  |  | 79 |  |  |  | (20,043 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by operating
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62,452 |  |  |  | (18,296 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44,156 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and
    equipment
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (13,892 | ) |  |  | (2,065 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (15,957 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition and acquisitions
    payments, net of cash received
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (171,076 | ) |  |  | 225 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (170,851 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other asset and liabilities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,761 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,761 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash used in investing
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (186,729 | ) |  |  | (1,840 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (188,569 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common
    stock
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,914 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,914 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common
    stock under equity incentive plans
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,887 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,887 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (187,068 | ) |  |  | (20,381 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (207,449 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 187,068 |  |  |  | 19,710 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 206,778 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (237,008 | ) |  |  | (1,328 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (238,336 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 227,459 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 227,459 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of
    8% senior notes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease
    obligations
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (46 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (46 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17,714 | ) |  |  | 22,054 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,340 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by financing
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 168,492 |  |  |  | 20,055 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 188,547 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
    CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (5,456 | ) |  |  | 567 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,889 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH
    EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38,759 |  |  |  | 486 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39,245 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 394 |  |  |  | 1,002 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,396 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 39,153 |  |  | $ | 1,488 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 40,641 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    
    89
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 273,518 |  |  | $ | 107,985 |  |  | $ | (1,058 | ) |  | $ | 380,445 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 222,079 |  |  |  | 88,675 |  |  |  | (1,058 | ) |  |  | 309,696 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51,439 |  |  |  | 19,310 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 70,749 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND
    ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27,873 |  |  |  | 11,237 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39,110 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 107 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 107 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,459 |  |  |  | 8,073 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31,532 |  | 
| 
    OTHER (INCOME)/EXPENSE
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,457 | ) |  |  | (1,290 | ) |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | (1,247 | ) | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,879 |  |  |  | 2,365 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,244 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF
    DEBT
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,605 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,605 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income Before Provision for Income
    Taxes
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18,432 |  |  |  | 6,998 |  |  |  | (1,500 | ) |  |  | 23,930 |  | 
| 
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,383 |  |  |  | 98 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,481 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCOME
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 12,049 |  |  | $ | 6,900 |  |  | $ | (1,500 | ) |  | $ | 17,449 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    90
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 12,049 |  |  | $ | 6,900 |  |  | $ | (1,500 | ) |  | $ | 17,449 |  | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income
    to net cash provided by operating activities:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,086 |  |  |  | 1,481 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,567 |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt
    financing costs
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 478 |  |  |  | 44 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 522 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,031 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,031 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,125 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,125 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,643 |  |  |  | (303 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,340 |  | 
| 
    Noncash gain on forward exchange
    contracts
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,291 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,291 | ) | 
| 
    Noncash interest expense on
    subordinated debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 481 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 481 |  | 
| 
    Change in other operating items
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,889 | ) |  |  | 842 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,047 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by operating
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28,004 |  |  |  | 7,673 |  |  |  | (1,500 | ) |  |  | 34,177 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and
    equipment
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6,392 | ) |  |  | (2,515 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (8,907 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash used in investing
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6,392 | ) |  |  | (2,515 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (8,907 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
    ACTIVITIES:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common
    stock under equity incentive plans
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47,105 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47,105 |  | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (62,125 | ) |  |  | (18,450 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (80,575 | ) | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit
    facility
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45,775 |  |  |  | 12,317 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58,092 |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (100,781 | ) |  |  | (15,250 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (116,031 | ) | 
| 
    Long-term borrowings
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52,000 |  |  |  | 14,061 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66,061 |  | 
| 
    Repayment of subordinated debt
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,112 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,112 | ) | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease
    obligations
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (15 | ) | 
| 
    Other, net
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,202 | ) |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | 48 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash used in financing
    activities
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (23,355 | ) |  |  | (6,572 | ) |  |  | 1,500 |  |  |  | (28,427 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
    CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 112 |  |  |  | 955 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,067 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
    EQUIVALENTS
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,631 | ) |  |  | (459 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,090 | ) | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,025 |  |  |  | 1,461 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,486 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
    
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 394 |  |  | $ | 1,002 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1,396 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    91
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)
    |  |  | 
    | 17. | Quarterly
    Financial Data (Unaudited): | 
 
    The following is a condensed summary of actual quarterly results
    of operations for 2006 and 2005 (in thousands, except per share
    amounts):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Operating 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Basic Earnings 
 |  |  | Diluted Earnings 
 |  | 
|  |  | Revenues |  |  | Gross Profit |  |  | Income |  |  | Net Income |  |  | Per Share |  |  | Per Share(1) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2006:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    First
    
 |  | $ | 229,345 |  |  | $ | 38,734 |  |  | $ | 25,477 |  |  | $ | 13,408 |  |  | $ | 0.64 |  |  | $ | 0.62 |  | 
| 
    Second
    
 |  | $ | 234,787 |  |  | $ | 40,197 |  |  | $ | 26,847 |  |  | $ | 15,494 |  |  | $ | 0.73 |  |  | $ | 0.72 |  | 
| 
    Third
    
 |  | $ | 235,841 |  |  | $ | 40,797 |  |  | $ | 27,399 |  |  | $ | 18,006 |  |  | $ | 0.85 |  |  | $ | 0.84 |  | 
| 
    Fourth
    
 |  | $ | 218,778 |  |  | $ | 30,110 |  |  | $ | 17,751 |  |  | $ | 11,142 |  |  | $ | 0.52 |  |  | $ | 0.51 |  | 
| 
    2005:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    First
    
 |  | $ | 152,415 |  |  | $ | 26,252 |  |  | $ | 16,679 |  |  | $ | 10,886 |  |  | $ | 0.61 |  |  | $ | 0.59 |  | 
| 
    Second
    
 |  | $ | 196,091 |  |  | $ | 36,142 |  |  | $ | 25,830 |  |  | $ | 14,185 |  |  | $ | 0.79 |  |  | $ | 0.78 |  | 
| 
    Third
    
 |  | $ | 205,859 |  |  | $ | 36,495 |  |  | $ | 24,566 |  |  | $ | 11,898 |  |  | $ | 0.58 |  |  | $ | 0.57 |  | 
| 
    Fourth
    
 |  | $ | 200,116 |  |  | $ | 35,561 |  |  | $ | 22,453 |  |  | $ | 12,442 |  |  | $ | 0.59 |  |  | $ | 0.58 |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (1) |  | See Note 13 for discussion on the computation of diluted
    shares outstanding. | 
 
    The sum of the per share amounts for the quarters does not equal
    the total for the year due to the application of the treasury
    stock methods.
    
    92
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 9. | Changes
    in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
    Financial Disclosure | 
 
    There were no changes in or disagreements with our independent
    accountants on matters of accounting and financial disclosures.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 9A. | Controls
    and Procedures | 
 
    Evaluation
    of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
    Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and
    procedures (as defined in
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e)
    under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2006, our chief
    executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded
    that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
    ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
    reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
    recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
    periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and were
    effective.
    
    93
 
    Managements
    Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
    Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
    adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
    control over financial reporting is defined in
    Rules 13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f)
    promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or
    under the supervision of our principal executive and principal
    financial officers and effected by our board of directors,
    management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
    United States. Such internal control includes those policies and
    procedures that:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
    accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
    of the assets; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
    necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
    that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
    only in accordance with authorizations of management and
    directors; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
    detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
    assets that could have a material effect on the financial
    statements. | 
 
    Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
    control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.
    In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in
    Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued
    by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
    Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has
    determined that, as of December 31, 2006, our internal
    control over financial reporting is effective based on those
    criteria.
 
    Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
    internal control over financial reporting as of
    December 31, 2006 has been audited by Deloitte and Touche
    LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
    in their report which appears in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
| /s/  Mervin
    Dunn  Mervin
    Dunn
 Chief Executive Officer
 |  | /s/  Chad
    M. Utrup
    Chad
    M. Utrup Chief Financial Officer
 | 
 
    March 13, 2007
    
    94
 
    Report of
    Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
    To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
 
    We have audited managements assessment, included in the
    accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
    Financial Reporting, that Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and
    subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective
    internal control over financial reporting as of
    December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in
    Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued
    by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
    Commission (the COSO Framework). The Companys
    management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
    control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
    responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
    assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
    Companys internal control over financial reporting based
    on our audit.
 
    We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
    standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
    reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
    over financial reporting was maintained in all material
    respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
    internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
    managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
    and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
    such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
    circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
    basis for our opinions.
 
    A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
    process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
    companys principal executive and principal financial
    officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
    by the companys board of directors, management, and other
    personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
    reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
    financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
    generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
    internal control over financial reporting includes those
    policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
    of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
    reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
    company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
    are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
    statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
    principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
    are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
    management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
    reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
    unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
    companys assets that could have a material effect on the
    financial statements.
 
    Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
    financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
    improper management override of controls, material misstatements
    due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
    timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
    effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
    to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
    become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
    degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
    deteriorate.
 
    In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
    maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
    as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
    respects, based on the criteria established in the COSO
    Framework. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
    material respects, effective internal control over financial
    reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria
    established in the COSO Framework.
    
    95
 
 
    We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
    consolidated financial statements and financial statement
    schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 of
    the Company and our report dated March 13, 2007, expressed
    an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and
    financial statement schedule and included an explanatory
    paragraph relating to the Companys changes in its method
    of accounting for defined benefit pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans and share-based compensation plans
    in 2006.
 
    /s/  Deloitte &
    Touche LLP
 
 
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    March 13, 2007
    
    96
 
    Changes
    in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
    No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as
    defined in
    Rules 13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f)
    under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended
    December 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is
    reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
    over financial reporting.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 9B. | Other
    Information | 
 
    None.
 
    PART III
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 10. | Directors,
    Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | A. | Directors
    of the Registrant | 
 
    The following table sets forth certain information with respect
    to our current directors as of December 31, 2006:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Name
 |  | 
    Age
 |  | 
    Principal Position(s)
 | 
|  | 
| 
    Scott D. Rued
    
 |  |  | 50 |  |  | Chairman and Director | 
| 
    Mervin Dunn
    
 |  |  | 53 |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer
    and Director | 
| 
    Scott C. Arves
    
 |  |  | 50 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    David R. Bovee
    
 |  |  | 57 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    Robert C. Griffin
    
 |  |  | 58 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    S.A. Johnson
    
 |  |  | 66 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    Richard A. Snell
    
 |  |  | 65 |  |  | Director | 
 
    The following biographies describe the business experience of
    our directors:
 
    Scott D. Rued has served as a Director since February
    2001 and Chairman since April 2002. Since August 2003,
    Mr. Rued has served as a Managing Partner of Thayer Capital
    Partners (Thayer). Prior to joining Thayer,
    Mr. Rued served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
    Hidden Creek Industries (Hidden Creek) from May 2000
    to August 2003. From January 1994 through April 2000,
    Mr. Rued served as Executive Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer of Hidden Creek. Mr. Rued also serves as
    a Director of Suntron Corporation.
 
    Scott C. Arves has served as a Director since July 2005.
    Since January 2007, Mr. Arves has served as President and
    Chief Executive Officer of Transport America, a truckload,
    intermodal and logistics services provider. Prior to joining
    Transport America, Mr. Arves was President of
    Transportation for Schneider National, Inc., a provider of
    transportation, logistics and related services, from May 2000 to
    July 2006.
 
    David R. Bovee has served as a Director since October
    2004. Mr. Bovee served as Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.
    (Dura) from January 2001 to March 2005 and from
    November 1990 to May 1997. In October 2006, when Mr. Bovee
    was no longer affiliated with that company, Dura filed a
    voluntary petition for reorganization under the federal
    bankruptcy laws. From May 1997 until January 2001,
    Mr. Bovee served as Vice President of Business Development.
    Mr. Bovee also served as Assistant Secretary for Dura.
    Prior to joining Dura, Mr. Bovee served as Vice President
    at Wickes in its Automotive Group from 1987 to 1990.
 
    Robert C. Griffin has served as a Director since July
    2005. Mr. Griffin has held numerous positions of
    responsibility in the financial sector, including Head of
    Investment Banking, Americas and Management Committee Member for
    Barclays Capital from 2000 to 2002, and prior to that as
    the Global Head of Financial Sponsor Coverage for Bank of
    America Securities from 1998 to 2000 and Group Executive Vice
    President of Bank of America from 1997 to 1998. Mr. Griffin
    also currently serves as a Director of Builders FirstSource, Inc.
    
    97
 
 
    S.A. (Tony) Johnson has served as a Director
    since September 2000. Mr. Johnson is currently a Managing
    Partner of OG Partners, a private industrial management company,
    and has served in that capacity since 2004. Mr. Johnson
    served as the Chairman of Hidden Creek from May 2001 to May 2004
    and from 1989 to May 2001 was its Chief Executive Officer and
    President. Prior to forming Hidden Creek, Mr. Johnson
    served from 1985 to 1989 as Chief Operating Officer of Pentair,
    Inc., a diversified industrial company. Mr. Johnson also
    currently serves as Chairman and a Director of Tower Automotive,
    Inc. and Cooper-Standard Automotive, Inc.
 
    Richard A. Snell has served as a Director since August
    2004. Mr. Snell has served as Chairman and Chief Executive
    Officer of Qualitor, Inc. since May 2005 and as an Operating
    Partner at Thayer Capital Partners since 2003. Prior to joining
    Thayer Capital Partners, Mr. Snell was a consultant from
    2000 to 2003 and prior thereto, served as Chairman and Chief
    Executive Officer of Federal-Mogul Corporation, an automotive
    parts manufacturer, from 1996 to 2000. In October 2001, when
    Mr. Snell was no longer affiliated with that company,
    Federal-Mogul Corporation filed a voluntary petition for
    reorganization under the federal bankruptcy laws. Prior to
    joining Federal-Mogul Corporation, Mr. Snell served as
    Chief Executive Officer at Tenneco Automotive, also an
    automotive parts manufacturer. Mr. Snell also currently
    serves as a Director of Schneider National, Inc.
 
 
    The following table sets forth certain information with respect
    to our current executive officers as of December 31, 2006:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Name
 |  | 
    Age
 |  | 
    Principal Position(s)
 | 
|  | 
| 
    Mervin Dunn
    
 |  |  | 53 |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer
    and Director | 
| 
    Chad M. Utrup
    
 |  |  | 34 |  |  | Chief Financial Officer | 
| 
    Gerald L. Armstrong
    
 |  |  | 45 |  |  | President   CVG Global
    Truck | 
| 
    W. Gordon Boyd
    
 |  |  | 59 |  |  | President   CVG Global
    Construction | 
| 
    James F. Williams
    
 |  |  | 60 |  |  | Vice President of Human Resources | 
 
    The following biographies describe the business experience of
    our executive officers:
 
    Mervin Dunn has served as a Director since August 2004
    and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since June
    2002, and prior thereto served as the President of Trim Systems,
    commencing upon his joining us in October 1999. From 1998 to
    1999, Mr. Dunn served as the President and Chief Executive
    Officer of Bliss Technologies, a heavy metal stamping company.
    From 1988 to 1998, Mr. Dunn served in a number of key
    leadership roles at Arvin Industries, including Vice President
    of Operating Systems (Arvin North America), Vice President of
    Quality, and President of Arvin Ride Control. From 1985 to 1988,
    Mr. Dunn held several key management positions in
    engineering and quality assurance at Johnson Controls Automotive
    Group, an automotive trim company, including
    Division Quality Manager. From 1980 to 1985, Mr. Dunn
    served in a number of management positions for engineering and
    quality departments of Hyster Corporation, a manufacturer of
    heavy lift trucks.
 
    Chad M. Utrup has served as the Chief Financial Officer
    since January 2003, and prior thereto served as the Vice
    President of Finance at Trim Systems since 2000. Prior to
    joining us in February 1998, Mr. Utrup served as a project
    management group member at Electronic Data Systems. While with
    Electronic Data Systems, Mr. Utrups responsibilities
    included financial support and implementing cost recovery and
    efficiency programs at various Delphi Automotive Systems support
    locations.
 
    Gerald L. Armstrong has served as President 
    CVG Global Truck since November 2006. From April 2004 to
    November 2006, Mr. Armstrong served as
    President  CVG Americas and from July 2002 to April
    2004 as Vice President and General Manager of National Seating
    and KAB North America. Prior to joining us, Mr. Armstrong
    served from 1995 to 2000 and from 2000 to July 2002 as Vice
    President and General Manager, respectively, of Gabriel Ride
    Control Products, a manufacturer of shock absorbers and related
    ride control products for the automotive and light truck
    markets, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ArvinMeritor Inc.
    Mr. Armstrong began his service with ArvinMeritor Inc., a
    manufacturer of automotive and commercial
    
    98
 
    vehicle components, modules and systems in 1987, and served in
    various positions of increasing responsibility within its light
    vehicle original equipment and aftermarket divisions before
    starting at Gabriel Ride Control Products. Prior to 1987,
    Mr. Armstrong held various positions of increasing
    responsibility including Quality Engineer and Senior Quality
    Supervisor and Quality Manager with Schlumberger Industries and
    Hyster Corporation.
 
    W. Gordon Boyd has served as President 
    CVG Global Construction since November 2006. From June 2005 to
    November 2006, Mr. Boyd served as President  CVG
    International and prior thereto served as our
    President  Mayflower Vehicle Systems from the time we
    completed the acquisition of Mayflower in February 2005.
    Mr. Boyd joined Mayflower Vehicle Systems U.K. as
    Manufacturing Director in 1993. In 2002, Mr. Boyd became
    President and Chief Executive Officer of MVS, Inc.
 
    James F. Williams has served as the Vice President of
    Human Resources since August 1999. Prior to joining us,
    Mr. Williams served as Corporate Vice President of Human
    Resources and Administration for SPECO Corporation from January
    1996 to August 1999. From April 1984 to January 1996,
    Mr. Williams served in various key human resource
    management positions in General Electrics Turbine,
    Lighting and Semi Conductor business. In addition,
    Mr. Williams served as Manager of Labor Relations and
    Personnel Services at Mack Trucks Allentown Corporate
    location from 1976 to 1984.
 
    On February 5, 2007, we appointed Kevin R.L. Frailey as
    Executive Vice President of Business Development. Prior to
    joining us, Mr. Frailey served as General Manager for Joint
    Ventures and Business Strategy at ArvinMeritors Emissions
    Technologies Group from 2003 to early 2007. From 1988 to 2007,
    Mr. Frailey held several key management positions in
    engineering, sales and worldwide supplier development at
    ArvinMeritor. In addition, during that time Mr. Frailey
    served on the board of various joint ventures, most notably
    those of Arvin Sango, Inc., and AD Tech Co., Ltd.
 
    There are no family relationships between any of our directors
    or executive officers.
 
    |  |  | 
    | C. | Section 16(a)
    Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | 
 
    The information required by Item 10 with respect to
    compliance with reporting requirements is incorporated herein by
    reference to the section labeled Section 16(a)
    Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance which appears in
    CVGs 2007 Proxy Statement.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 11. | Executive
    Compensation | 
 
    The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the sections labeled Director
    Compensation and Executive Compensation and Other
    Matters which appear in CVGs 2007 Proxy Statement
    excluding information under the headings Compensation
    Discussion and Analysis.
    
    99
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 12. | Security
    Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
    Related Stockholder Matters | 
 
    Options to purchase common shares of our common stock have been
    granted to certain of our executives and key employees under our
    amended and restated equity incentive plan and our management
    stock option plan. The following table summarizes the number of
    stock options granted, net of forfeitures and exercises, and
    shares of restricted stock awarded and issued, net of
    forfeitures and shares on which restrictions have lapsed, the
    weighted-average exercise price of such stock options and the
    number of securities remaining to be issued under all
    outstanding equity compensation plans as of December 31,
    2006:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Number of 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted-average 
 |  |  | Securities 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of Securities to be 
 |  |  | Exercise Price of 
 |  |  | Remaining Available 
 |  | 
|  |  | Issued upon Exercise of 
 |  |  | Outstanding 
 |  |  | for Future Issuance 
 |  | 
|  |  | Outstanding Options, 
 |  |  | Options, Warrants 
 |  |  | Under Equity 
 |  | 
|  |  | Warrants and Rights(1) |  |  | and Rights |  |  | Compensation Plans |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Equity compensation plans approved
    by security holders:
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amended and Restated Equity
    Incentive Plan
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Stock Options
    
 |  |  | 515,850 |  |  | $ | 15.84 |  |  |  |  | (3) | 
| 
    Restricted Stock(2)
    
 |  |  | 309,274 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3) | 
| 
    Management Stock Option Plan
    
 |  |  | 303,308 |  |  | $ | 5.54 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Equity compensation plans not
    approved by stockholders
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
    
 |  |  | 1,128,432 |  |  | $ | 12.03 |  |  |  | 101,283 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (1) |  | In connection with our merger with Trim Systems, Inc., options
    to purchase shares of Trim Systems, Inc.s common stock
    were converted into options to purchase shares of our common
    stock. Of these, options to purchase an aggregate of
    28,951 shares at a weighted-average exercise price of
    $9.43 per share were outstanding at December 31, 2006.
    These options are not included in the table. | 
|  | 
    | (2) |  | 207,700 shares of restricted stock were issued during 2006
    under our Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. These
    shares of restricted stock vest in three equal annual
    installments commencing on October 20, 2007. | 
|  | 
    | (3) |  | 101,283 shares are available for future issuance under our
    Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. | 
 
    The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the sections labeled Security Ownership of
    Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
    Employee Benefit Plans, which appear in CVGs
    2007 Proxy Statement.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 13. | Certain
    Relationships, Related Transactions and Director
    Independence | 
 
    The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the section labeled Certain Relationships
    and Related Transactions and
    Proposal No. 1  Election of
    Directors  Director Independence which appears
    in CVGs 2007 Proxy Statement.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 14. | Principal
    Accountant Fees and Services | 
 
    The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the section labeled Principal Accountant
    Fees and Services which appears in CVGs 2007 Proxy
    Statement.
    
    100
 
 
    PART IV
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 15. | Exhibits
    and Financial Statements Schedules | 
 
    (1) LIST
    OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
    The following financial statement schedules of the
    Corporation and its subsidiaries are included herein:
 
    Schedule II  Valuation and Qualifying
    Accounts and Reserves.
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    SCHEDULE II:
    VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
    
    December 31,
    2006, 2005 and 2004
 
    Allowance
    for Doubtful Accounts:
 
    The transactions in the allowance for doubtful account for the
    years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of
    the year
    
 |  | $ | 6,087 |  |  | $ | 2,681 |  |  | $ | 2,530 |  | 
| 
    Acquisition recorded
    
 |  |  | 119 |  |  |  | 1,524 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Provisions
    
 |  |  | 4,246 |  |  |  | 4,287 |  |  |  | 2,448 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
    
 |  |  | (4,963 | ) |  |  | (2,194 | ) |  |  | (2,390 | ) | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
    
 |  |  | 47 |  |  |  | (211 | ) |  |  | 93 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of the year
    
 |  | $ | 5,536 |  |  | $ | 6,087 |  |  | $ | 2,681 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Additional
    Purchase Liabilities Recorded in Conjunction with
    Acquisitions:
 
    The transactions in the purchase liabilities account recorded in
    conjunction with acquisitions for the years ended
    December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of
    the year
    
 |  | $ | 317 |  |  | $ | 423 |  |  | $ | 620 |  | 
| 
    Provisions
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
    
 |  |  | (70 | ) |  |  | (106 | ) |  |  | (197 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of the year
    
 |  | $ | 247 |  |  | $ | 317 |  |  | $ | 423 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Facility
    Closure and Consolidation Costs:
 
    The transactions in the facility closure and consolidation costs
    account for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of
    the year
    
 |  | $ | 2,013 |  |  | $ | 278 |  |  | $ | 787 |  | 
| 
    Provisions
    
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,013 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
    
 |  |  | (1,953 | ) |  |  | (278 | ) |  |  | (509 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of the year
    
 |  | $ | 60 |  |  | $ | 2,013 |  |  | $ | 278 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    All other schedules for which provision is made in the
    applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required
    under the related instructions or are inapplicable and,
    therefore, have been omitted.
    
    101
 
 
    (2) LIST
    OF EXHIBITS
 
    The following exhibits are either included in this report or
    incorporated herein by reference as indicated below:
 
    EXHIBIT INDEX
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 2 | .1 |  | Agreement of Purchase and Sale,
    dated February 7, 2004, by and among, CVG Acquisition LLC,
    Mayflower Vehicle Systems, Inc., Mayflower Vehicle Systems
    Michigan, Inc., Wayne Stamping and Assembly LLC and
    Wayne-Orrville Investments LLC (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15, 2005). | 
|  | 2 | .2 |  | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as
    of June 3, 2005, by and between Monona Holdings LLC and
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 2 | .3 |  | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as
    of August 8, 2005, by and between Trim Systems, Inc.
    Cabarrus Plastics, Inc. and the Shareholders listed therein
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
    on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890)
    filed on August 12, 2005). | 
|  | 3 | .1 |  | Amended and Restated Certificate
    of Incorporation of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (incorporated
    by reference to the Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 3 | .2 |  | Amended and Restated By-laws of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 4 | .1 |  | Indenture, dated July 6,
    2005, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto
    and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with
    respect to 8.0% senior notes due 2013 (incorporated herein
    by reference to the Companys Current Report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 8, 2005). | 
|  | 4 | .2 |  | Supplemental Indenture, dated as
    of August 10, 2005, by and among the Company, Cabarrus
    Plastics, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and
    U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference
    to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890)
    filed on August 12, 2005). | 
|  | 4 | .3 |  | Supplemental Indenture, dated as
    of November 10, 2006, among the Company, CVG European
    Holdings, LLC, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and
    U.S. Bank National Association. | 
|  | 4 | .4 |  | Registration Rights Agreement,
    dated July 6, 2005, among the Company, the subsidiary
    guarantors party thereto and the purchasers named therein
    (incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current
    Report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 8, 2005). | 
|  | 4 | .5 |  | Form of senior note (attached as
    exhibit to Exhibit 4.1). | 
|  | 10 | .1 |  | Revolving Credit and Term Loan
    Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2004, by and among
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from
    time to time parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers
    from time to time parties thereto, the banks from time to time
    parties hereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the
    banks, as administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank,
    one of the banks, as syndication agent for the banks
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
    report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .2 |  | First Amendment to Revolving
    Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 16,
    2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the
    subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the
    foreign currency borrowers from time to time parties thereto,
    the banks from time to time parties hereto, U.S. Bank
    National Association, one of the banks, as administrative agent
    for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the banks, as
    syndication agent for the banks(incorporated by reference to the
    Companys annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15, 2005). | 
    
    102
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .3 |  | Second Amendment to Revolving
    Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of February 7,
    2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the
    subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the
    foreign currency borrowers from time to time parties thereto,
    the banks from time to time parties hereto, U.S. Bank
    National Association, one of the banks, as administrative agent
    for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the banks, as
    syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by reference to
    the Companys annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15,2005). | 
|  | 10 | .4 |  | Third Amendment to Revolving
    Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2005,
    by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary
    borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the foreign
    currency borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the banks
    from time to time parties thereto, U.S. Bank National
    Association, one of the banks, as administrative agent for the
    banks and Comerica Bank, one of the banks, as syndication agent
    for the banks(incorporated by reference to the Companys
    current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .5 |  | Fourth Amendment to Revolving
    Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2005,
    by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary
    borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the foreign
    currency borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the banks
    from time to time parties thereto, U.S. Bank National
    Association, one of the banks, as administrative agent for the
    banks and Comerica Bank, one of the banks, as syndication agent
    for the banks (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 6, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .6 |  | Fifth Amendment to Revolving
    Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 12, 2005,
    by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary
    borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the foreign
    currency borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the banks
    from time to time parties thereto, U.S. Bank National
    Association, one of the banks, as administrative agent for the
    banks, and Comerica Bank one of the banks, as syndication agent
    for the banks(incorporated by reference to the Companys
    current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 14, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .7 |  | Sixth Amendment to Revolving
    Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 30,
    2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the
    subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties thereto, the
    foreign currency borrowers from time to time parties thereto,
    the banks from time to time parties thereto, U.S. Bank
    National Association, one of the banks, as administrative agent
    for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of the banks, as
    syndication agent for the banks(incorporated by reference to the
    Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on January 1, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .8 |  | Investor Stockholders Agreement,
    dated October 5, 2000, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc.,
    Onex American Holdings LLC, J2R Partners VII and the
    stockholders listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated
    by reference to the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .9 |  | Investor Stockholders Joinder
    Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2003, by and among Bostrom
    Holding, Inc. and J2RPartners VI, CVS Partners, LP and CVS
    Executive Investco LLC (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21,2004). | 
|  | 10 | .10 |  | Joinder to the Investor
    Stockholders Agreement by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and
    the prior stockholders of Trim Systems (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .11 |  | Management Stockholders Agreement,
    dated as of August 9,2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc., Onex American Holdings II LLC and the
    individuals named on Schedule I thereto (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .12 |  | Note Purchase Agreement,
    dated September 30, 2002, by and among Bostrom Holding,
    Inc., Baird Capital Partners II Limited, BCP II
    Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership, Baird Capital II
    Limited Partnership, Baird Capital Partners III Limited
    Partnership, BCP III Special Affiliates Limited
    Partnership, BCP III Affiliates Fund Limited
    Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP and Hidden Creek
    Industries (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21,2004). | 
    
    103
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .13 |  | Form of Subordinated Promissory
    Note issued by Bostrom Holding, Inc. in favor of each of
    BCP II Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership, Baird
    Capital II Limited Partnership, Baird Capital
    Partners III Limited Partnership, BCP III Special
    Affiliates Limited Partnership BCP III Affiliates
    Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP
    and Hidden Creek Industries (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .14 |  | Promissory Note, dated as of
    June 28, 2001, issued by Trim Systems Operating Corp. in
    favor of 1363880 Ontario Inc., in the amount of $6,850,000
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
    statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .15 |  | Promissory Note, dated as of
    June 28, 2001, issued by Trim Systems Operating Corp. in
    favor of J2R Partners II-B, LLC, in the amount of $150,000
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
    statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .16* |  | Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management
    Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .17* |  | Form of Grant of Nonqualified
    Stock Option pursuant to the Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management
    Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21,2004). | 
|  | 10 | .18* |  | Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
    Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-59890),
    filed on May 11, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .19* |  | Form of Grant of Nonqualified
    Stock Option pursuant to the Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
    Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .20* |  | Employment agreement, dated as of
    May 16, 1997, with Donald P. Lorraine (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .21 |  | Recapitalization Agreement, dated
    as of August 4, 2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc. and the stockholders listed on the signature pages
    thereto (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17,2004). | 
|  | 10 | .22 |  | Form of Non-Competition Agreement
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
    statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .23 |  | Registration Agreement, dated
    October 5, 2000, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and the
    investors listed on Schedule A attached thereto
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
    statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .24 |  | Joinder to Registration Agreement,
    dated as of March 28,2003, by and among Bostrom Holding,
    Inc. and J2R Partners VI, CVS Partners, LP and CVS Executive
    Investco LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21,2004). | 
|  | 10 | .25 |  | Joinder to the Registration
    Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2004, by and among
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and the prior stockholders of
    Trim Systems (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .26* |  | Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
    2006 Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 28, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .27* |  | Service Agreement, dated
    March 1, 1993, between Motor Panels(Coventry) Plc and
    William Gordon Boyd (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-125626),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .28* |  | Assignment and Assumption
    Agreement, dated as of June 1,2004, between Mayflower
    Vehicle Systems PLC and Mayflower Vehicle Systems, Inc.
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
    statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-125626),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .29* |  | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
    pursuant to the Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and
    Restated Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
    amendment no. 1 to the Companys registration
    statement on
    Form S-4
    (File
    No. 333-129368),
    filed on December 1, 2005). | 
    
    104
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .30* |  | Change in Control &
    Non-Competition Agreement dated April 5, 2006 with Mervin
    Dunn (incorporated by reference to the Companys current
    report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .31* |  | Change in Control &
    Non-Competition Agreement dated April 5, 2006 with Gerald
    L. Armstrong (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .32* |  | Change in Control &
    Non-Competition Agreement dated April 5, 2006 with Chad M.
    Utrup (incorporated by reference to the Companys current
    report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .33* |  | Change in Control &
    Non-Competition Agreement dated April 5, 2006 with James F.
    Williams (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .34* |  | Deferred Compensation Plan
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
    report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on November 6, 2006). | 
|  | 12 | .1 |  | Computation of ratio of earnings
    to fixed charges. | 
|  | 21 | .1 |  | Subsidiaries of Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc. | 
|  | 23 | .1 |  | Consent of Deloitte &
    Touche LLP. | 
|  | 31 | .1 |  | Certification by Mervin Dunn,
    President and Chief Executive Officer. | 
|  | 31 | .2 |  | Certification by Chad M. Utrup,
    Chief Financial Officer. | 
|  | 32 | .1 |  | Certification pursuant to
    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | 
|  | 32 | .2 |  | Certification pursuant to
    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | * |  | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
    to be filed as an exhibit to this annual report on
    Form 10-K. | 
 
    All other items included in an Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    are omitted because they are not applicable or the answers
    thereto are none.
    
    105
 
 
    SIGNATURES
 
    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
    this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
    thereunto duly authorized.
 
    COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
 
    Scott D. Rued
    Chairman
 
    Date: March 13, 2007
 
    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this
    report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
    of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
    indicated.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 
    Signature
 |  | 
    Title
 |  | 
    Date
 | 
|  | 
| /s/  SCOTT
    D. RUED Scott
    D. Rued
 |  | Chairman and Director |  | March 13, 2007 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  MERVIN
    DUNN Mervin
    Dunn
 |  | President, Chief Executive
    Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and
 Director
 |  | March 13, 2007 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  SCOTT
    C. ARVES Scott
    C. Arves
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2007 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  DAVID
    R. BOVEE David
    R. Bovee
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2007 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  ROBERT
    C. GRIFFIN Robert
    C. Griffin
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2007 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  S.A.
    JOHNSON S.A.
    Johnson
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2007 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  RICHARD
    A. SNELL Richard
    A. Snell
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2007 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  CHAD
    M. UTRUP Chad
    M. Utrup
 |  | Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 |  | March 13, 2007 | 
    
    106
 
