e10vk
 
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
    EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    Washington, D.C.
    20549
 
 
 
 
    Form 10-K
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
    OF 1934
 
    |  |  |  | 
| For the fiscal year ended: |  | Commission file number: | 
| December 31, 2007 |  | 000-50890 | 
 
 
 
 
    COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP,
    INC.
    (Exact name of Registrant as
    specified in its charter)
 
    |  |  |  | 
| Delaware |  | 41-1990662 | 
| (State of
    Incorporation) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification
    No.) | 
|  |  |  | 
| 7800 Walton Parkway |  | 43054 | 
| New Albany, Ohio |  | (Zip Code) | 
| (Address of Principal Executive
    Offices) |  |  | 
 
    Registrants telephone number, including area code:
    (614) 289-5360
 
 
 
 
    Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
    Act:
 
    |  |  |  | 
| 
    Title of Each Class
 |  | 
    Name of Exchange on Which Registered
 | 
|  | 
| Common Stock, par value $.01 per share |  | The Nasdaq Global Select Market | 
 
    Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
    Act:
    None
 
 
 
 
    Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
    seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
    Act.  Yes o     No þ
    
 
    Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
    reports pursuant to Section 13 or Schedule 15(d) of
    the
    Act.  Yes o     No þ
    
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
    all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
    12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
    was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
    subject to such filing requirements for the past
    90 days.  Yes þ     No o
    
 
    Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
    pursuant to Item 405 of
    Regulation S-K
    is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
    of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
    information statements incorporated by reference in
    Part III of this
    Form 10-K
    or any amendment to this
    Form 10-K.  o
    
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
    accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
    filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
    large accelerated filer, accelerated
    filer and smaller reporting company in
    Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Large accelerated filer
    o
    
 |  | Accelerated filer
    þ |  | Non-accelerated
    filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 |  | Smaller reporting
    Company o | 
 
    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
    (as defined in
    Rule 12b-2
    of the Exchange
    Act).  Yes o     No þ
    
 
    The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
    equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
    at which the common equity was last sold on June 30, 2007,
    was $405,328,271.
 
    As of February 29, 2008, 22,054,372 shares of Common
    Stock of the Registrant were outstanding.
 
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
    Information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of
    Part III of this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    are incorporated by reference from the Registrants Proxy
    Statement for its annual meeting to be held May 20, 2008
    (the 2008 Proxy Statement).
 
 
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
 
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
 
    Table of Contents
 
    
    i
 
    CERTAIN
    DEFINITIONS
 
    All references in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    to the Company, Commercial Vehicle
    Group, CVG, we, us,
    and our refer to Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and
    its consolidated subsidiaries (unless the context otherwise
    requires).
 
    FORWARD-LOOKING
    INFORMATION
 
    This Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
    Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that
    are not statements of historical fact, including without
    limitation, certain statements under Item 1
     Business and Item 7 
    Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
    and Results of Operations and located elsewhere herein
    regarding industry prospects and our results of operations or
    financial position, may be deemed to be forward-looking
    statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words
    believes, anticipates,
    plans, expects, and similar expressions
    are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The
    important factors discussed in Item 1A 
    Risk Factors, among others, could cause actual results to
    differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking
    statements made herein and presented elsewhere by management
    from time to time. Such forward-looking statements represent
    managements current expectations and are inherently
    uncertain. Investors are warned that actual results may differ
    from managements expectations. Additionally, various
    economic and competitive factors could cause actual results to
    differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking
    statements, including, but not limited to, factors which are
    outside our control, such as risks relating to (i) our
    ability to develop or successfully introduce new products;
    (ii) risks associated with conducting business in foreign
    countries and currencies; (iii) general economic or
    business conditions affecting the markets in which we serve;
    (iv) increased competition in the heavy-duty truck or
    construction market; and (v) our failure to complete or
    successfully integrate additional strategic acquisitions. All
    subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
    attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly
    qualified in their entirety by such cautionary statements.
    
    ii
 
 
    PART I
 
 
    Overview
 
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation formed in
    August 2002) and its subsidiaries, is a leading supplier of
    fully integrated system solutions for the global commercial
    vehicle market, including the heavy-duty truck market, the
    construction and agriculture markets and the specialty and
    military transportation markets. Our products include static and
    suspension seat systems, interior trim systems (including
    instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry and floor
    systems), cab structures and components, mirrors, wiper systems,
    electronic wire harness assemblies and controls and switches
    specifically designed for applications in commercial vehicles.
 
    We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
    by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
    a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
    believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
    our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
    American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
    systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
    interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
    other structural components. We believe our products are used by
    virtually every major North American commercial vehicle original
    equipment manufacturer (OEM), which we believe
    creates an opportunity to cross-sell our products and offer a
    fully integrated system solution.
 
    Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
    new commercial vehicles manufactured, which in turn is a
    function of general economic conditions, interest rates, changes
    in governmental regulations, consumer spending, fuel costs and
    our customers inventory levels and production rates.
 
    New commercial vehicle demand in the North American Class 8
    truck market has historically been cyclical and is particularly
    sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy, which
    generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage hauled by
    commercial vehicles. Production of Class 8 heavy trucks in
    North America initially peaked in 1999 and experienced a
    downturn from 2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak economy, an
    oversupply of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending
    on commercial vehicles and equipment. Demand for commercial
    vehicles improved from 2004 to 2006 due to broad economic
    recovery in North America, corresponding growth in the movement
    of goods, the growing need to replace aging truck fleets and
    OEMs receiving larger than expected pre-orders in anticipation
    of the new EPA emissions standards becoming effective in 2007.
    During 2007, the demand for North American Class 8 heavy
    trucks experienced a downturn as a result of pre-orders in 2006
    and general weakness in the North American economy and
    corresponding decline in the need for commercial vehicles to
    haul freight tonnage in North America.
 
    New commercial vehicle demand in the global construction
    equipment market generally follows certain economic conditions
    around the world. Within the construction market, there are two
    classes of construction equipment, the medium/heavy equipment
    market (weighing over 12 metric tons) and the light construction
    equipment market (weighing below 12 metric tons). Demand in the
    medium/heavy construction equipment market is typically related
    to the level of larger scale infrastructure development projects
    such as highways, dams, harbors, hospitals, airports and
    industrial development as well as activity in the mining,
    forestry and other raw material based industries. Demand in the
    light construction equipment market is typically related to
    certain economic conditions such as the level of housing
    construction and other smaller-scale developments and projects.
    Our products are primarily used in the medium/heavy construction
    equipment markets.
 
    Recent
    Acquisitions
 
    In October 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock
    of PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o. (PEKM), an electronic
    wire harness manufacturer primarily for the commercial truck
    market, with facilities in the Czech Republic and the Ukraine.
 
    In October 2007, we acquired the heavy-gauge thermoforming and
    injection molding assets of the Fabrication Division of Gage
    Industries, Inc. (Gage).
    
    1
 
    In December 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of
    Short Bark Industries, LLC (SBI), a supplier of seat
    covers and various
    cut-and-sew
    trim products.
 
    See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements
    contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for detailed information on these transactions.
 
    Industry
 
    Within the commercial vehicle industry, we sell our products
    primarily to the North American heavy truck OEM market
    (approximately 41% of our 2007 revenues), the global
    construction OEM market (approximately 26% of our 2007 revenues)
    and the aftermarket and OEM service organizations (approximately
    13% of our 2007 revenues). The majority of our remaining 20% of
    2007 revenues was derived primarily from other global commercial
    vehicle and specialty markets.
 
    Commercial
    Vehicle Supply Market Overview
 
    Commercial vehicles are used in a wide variety of end markets,
    including local and long-haul commercial trucking, bus,
    construction, mining, general industrial, marine, municipal and
    recreation. The commercial vehicle supply industry can generally
    be separated into two categories: (1) sales to OEMs, in
    which products are sold in relatively large quantities directly
    for use by OEMs in new commercial vehicles; and
    (2) aftermarket sales, in which products are
    sold as replacements in varying quantities to a wide range of
    OEM service organizations, wholesalers, retailers and
    installers. In the OEM market, suppliers are generally divided
    into tiers  Tier 1 suppliers (like
    our company), who provide their products directly to OEMs, and
    Tier 2 or Tier 3 suppliers,
    who sell their products principally to other suppliers for
    integration into those suppliers own product offerings.
 
    Our largest end market, the commercial truck and construction
    industry, is supplied by heavy- and medium-duty commercial
    vehicle suppliers as well as automotive suppliers. The
    commercial vehicle supplier industry is highly fragmented and
    comprised of several large companies and many smaller companies.
    In addition, the commercial vehicle supplier industry is
    characterized by relatively low production volumes as well as
    considerable barriers to entry, including the following:
    (1) significant investment requirements, (2) stringent
    technical and manufacturing requirements, (3) high
    transition costs to shift production to new suppliers,
    (4) just-in-time
    delivery requirements and (5) strong brand name
    recognition. Foreign competition is limited in the commercial
    vehicle market due to many factors, including the need to be
    responsive to order changes on short notice, high shipping
    costs, customer concerns about quality given the safety aspect
    of many of our products and service requirements.
 
    Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
    new vehicle production, suppliers like us can also grow by
    increasing their product content per vehicle through cross
    selling and bundling of products, further penetrating business
    with existing customers, gaining new customers and expanding
    into new geographic markets and by increasing aftermarket sales.
    We believe that companies with a global presence and advanced
    technology, engineering, manufacturing and support capabilities,
    such as our company, are well positioned to take advantage of
    these opportunities.
 
    North
    American Commercial Truck Market
 
    Purchasers of commercial trucks include fleet operators, owner
    operators and other industrial end users. Commercial vehicles
    used for local and long-haul commercial trucking are generally
    classified by gross vehicle weight. Class 8 vehicles are
    trucks with gross vehicle weight in excess of 33,000 lbs. and
    Class 5 through 7 vehicles are trucks with gross vehicle
    weight from 16,001 lbs. to 33,000 lbs. The following table shows
    commercial vehicle production levels for 2001 through 2007 in
    North America:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2001 |  |  | 2002 |  |  | 2003 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  | 
|  |  | (Thousands of units) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Class 8 heavy trucks
 |  |  | 146 |  |  |  | 181 |  |  |  | 182 |  |  |  | 269 |  |  |  | 341 |  |  |  | 378 |  |  |  | 212 |  | 
| 
    Class 5-7
    light and medium-duty trucks
 |  |  | 189 |  |  |  | 194 |  |  |  | 188 |  |  |  | 225 |  |  |  | 245 |  |  |  | 266 |  |  |  | 206 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
 |  |  | 335 |  |  |  | 375 |  |  |  | 370 |  |  |  | 494 |  |  |  | 586 |  |  |  | 644 |  |  |  | 418 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    Source: ACT Publications, The Commercial Truck, Bus and Trailer
    Industry OUTLOOK (February 2008).
    
    2
 
    The following describes the major segments of the commercial
    vehicle market in which we compete:
 
    Class 8
    Truck Market
 
    The global Class 8 truck manufacturing market is
    concentrated in three primary regions: North America,
    Asia-Pacific and Europe. The global Class 8 truck market is
    localized in nature due to the following factors: (1) the
    prohibitive costs of shipping components from one region to
    another, (2) the high degree of customization of
    Class 8 trucks to meet the region-specific demands of end
    users, and (3) the ability to meet
    just-in-time
    delivery requirements. According to ACT, four companies
    represented approximately 96% of North American Class 8
    truck production in 2007. The percentages of Class 8
    production represented by Freightliner, PACCAR, International
    and Volvo/Mack were approximately 34%, 27%, 19% and 16%,
    respectively. We supply products to all of these OEMs.
 
    Production of commercial vehicles in North America initially
    peaked in 1999 and experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 that
    was due to a weak economy, reduced sales following above-normal
    purchases in advance of new EPA emissions standards that became
    effective in October 2002, an oversupply of new and used vehicle
    inventory and lower spending on commercial vehicles and
    equipment. Following a substantial decline from 1999 to 2001,
    Class 8 truck unit production increased modestly to
    approximately 181,000 units in 2002 from approximately
    146,000 units in 2001, due primarily to the purchasing of
    trucks that occurred prior to the October 2002 mandate for more
    stringent engine emissions requirements. Subsequent to the
    engine emissions requirements, truck production continued to
    remain at historically low levels through mid-2003 due to
    continuing economic weakness and the reluctance of many trucking
    companies to invest during this period.
 
    In mid-2003, evidence of renewed growth emerged and truck
    tonmiles (number of miles driven multiplied by number of tons
    transported) began to increase, along with new truck sales.
    During the second half of 2003, new truck dealer inventories
    declined and, consequently, OEM truck order backlogs began to
    increase. According to ACT, monthly truck order rates began
    increasing significantly from December 2003 through 2005. In
    2006, OEMs received larger than expected pre-orders in
    anticipation of the new EPA emissions standards becoming
    effective in 2007. During 2007, the demand for North American
    Class 8 heavy trucks experienced a downturn as a result of
    2006 pre-orders, a general weakness in the North American
    economy and corresponding decline in the need for commercial
    vehicles to haul freight tonnage in North America.
 
    The following table illustrates North American Class 8
    truck build for the years 1998 to 2012:
 
    North
    American Class 8 Truck Build Rates
    (In thousands)
 
 
    E  Estimated
    Source: ACT Publications, Five Year Forecast (February 2008).
    
    3
 
 
    According to ACT, unit production for 2008 is estimated to
    increase approximately 5.7% from 2007 levels to approximately
    224,000 units. We believe that the decrease from 2006 to
    2007 was impacted by the more stringent EPA emissions standards
    becoming effective in early 2007 as well as a general weakness
    in the North American economy and corresponding decline in the
    need for commercial vehicles to haul freight tonnage in North
    America.
 
    We believe the following factors are currently driving the North
    American Class 8 truck market:
 
    Economic Conditions.  The North American truck
    industry is directly influenced by overall economic growth and
    consumer spending. Since truck OEMs supply the fleet lines of
    North America, their production levels generally match the
    demand for freight. The freight carried by these trucks includes
    consumer goods, machinery, food and beverages, construction
    equipment and supplies, electronic equipment and a wide variety
    of other materials. Since most of these items are driven by
    macroeconomic conditions, the truck industry tends to follow
    trends of gross domestic product (GDP). Generally,
    given the dependence of North American shippers on trucking as a
    freight alternative, general economic conditions have been a
    primary indicator of future truck builds.
 
    Truck Freight Growth.  ACT projects that total
    domestic truck freight will continue to increase over the next
    five years, driven by growth in GDP. In addition, national
    suppliers and distribution centers, burdened by the pricing
    pressure of large manufacturing and retail customers, have
    continued to reduce
    on-site
    inventory levels. This reduction requires freight handlers to
    provide to-the-hour delivery options. As a result,
    Class 8 trucks have replaced manufacturing warehouses as
    the preferred temporary storage facility for inventory. Since
    trucks are typically viewed as the most reliable and flexible
    shipping alternative, truck tonmiles, as well as truck platform
    improvements, should continue to increase in order to meet the
    increasing need for flexibility under a
    just-in-time
    system. ACT forecasts that total U.S. Class 8 truck
    tonmiles will increase from 3.7 million in 2007 to
    4.0 million in 2012, as summarized in the following graph:
 
    Total
    U.S. Tonmiles (Class 8)
    (Number of tonmiles in millions)
 
 
    E  Estimated
    Source: ACT Publications, Five Year Forecast (February 2008).
 
    Truck Replacement Cycle and Fleet Aging.  Since
    1998, the average age of active Class 8 trucks has
    increased from approximately 5.5 years in 1998 to
    approximately 6.0 years in 2007. The average fleet age
    tends to run in cycles as freight companies permit their truck
    fleets to age during periods of lagging demand and then
    replenish those fleets during periods of increasing demand.
    Additionally, as truck fleets age, their maintenance costs
    typically increase. Freight companies must therefore continually
    evaluate the economics between repair and replacement. Other
    factors, such as inventory management and the growth in
    less-than-truckload freight shipping, also tend to
    
    4
 
    increase fleet mileage and, as a result, the truck replacement
    cycle. The chart below illustrates the average age of active
    U.S. Class 8 trucks:
 
    Average
    Age of Active U.S. Class 8 Trucks
    (Number of years)
 
 
    E  Estimated
    Source: ACT Research (2008).
 
    Commercial
    Truck Aftermarket
 
    Demand for aftermarket products tends to be counter cyclical to
    OEM demand because vehicle owners are more likely to repair
    vehicles than purchase new ones during recessionary periods.
    Therefore, aftermarket demand moderately increases during such
    periods. Demand for aftermarket products is driven by the
    quality of OEM parts, the number of vehicles in operation, the
    average age of the vehicle fleet, vehicle usage, the average
    useful life of vehicle parts and total truck tonmiles. The
    aftermarket is a growing market, as the overall size of the
    North American fleet of Class 8 trucks has continued to
    increase and is attractive because of the recurring nature of
    the sales. Additionally, aftermarket sales tend to be at a
    higher margin, as truck component suppliers are able to leverage
    their already established fixed cost base and exert moderate
    pricing power with their replacement parts. The recurring nature
    of aftermarket revenue provides some insulation to the overall
    cyclical nature of the industry, as it tends to provide a more
    stable stream of revenues.
 
    Commercial
    Construction Vehicle Market
 
    New commercial vehicle demand in the global construction
    equipment market generally follows certain economic conditions
    around the world. Within the construction market, there are two
    classes of construction equipment: the medium/heavy equipment
    market (weighing over 12 metric tons) and the light construction
    equipment market (weighing below 12 metric tons). Demand in the
    medium/heavy construction equipment market is typically related
    to the level of larger scale infrastructure development projects
    such as highways, dams, harbors, hospitals, airports and
    industrial development as well as activity in the mining,
    forestry and other raw material based industries. Demand in the
    light construction equipment market is typically related to
    certain economic conditions such as the level of housing
    construction and other smaller-scale developments and projects.
    Our products are primarily used in the medium/heavy construction
    equipment markets.
 
    Purchasers of medium/heavy construction equipment include
    construction companies, municipalities, local governments,
    rental fleet owners, quarrying and mining companies and forestry
    related industries. Purchasers of light construction equipment
    include contractors, rental fleet owners, landscapers, logistics
    companies and farmers.
    
    5
 
    Military
    Equipment Market
 
    We supply products for heavy- and medium-payload tactical trucks
    that are used by various military customers. Sales and
    production of these vehicles can be influenced by overall
    defense spending both by the U.S. government and foreign
    governments and the presence of military conflicts and potential
    military conflicts throughout the world. Demand for these
    vehicles is expected to increase as the result of the continuing
    conflict in the Middle East. In addition, demand has increased
    for remanufacturing and replacement of the large fleet of
    vehicles that have served in the Middle East due to over-use and
    new armor and technology requirements.
 
    Commercial
    Vehicle Industry Trends
 
    Our performance and growth are directly related to trends in the
    commercial vehicle market that are focused on driver retention,
    comfort and safety. These commercial vehicle industry trends
    include the following:
 
    System Sourcing.  Commercial vehicle OEMs are
    seeking suppliers capable of providing fully-engineered,
    complete systems rather than suppliers who produce the separate
    parts that comprise a system. By outsourcing complete systems,
    OEMs are able to reduce the costs associated with the design and
    integration of different components and improve quality by
    requiring their suppliers to assemble and test major portions of
    the vehicle prior to beginning production. In addition, OEMs are
    able to develop more efficient assembly processes when complete
    systems are delivered in sequence rather than as individual
    parts or components.
 
    Globalization of Suppliers.  To serve multiple
    markets more cost effectively, commercial vehicle OEMs are
    beginning to standardize global vehicle platforms to be
    manufactured and sold in various geographic markets around the
    world. Having operations in the geographic markets in which OEMs
    produce their global platforms enables suppliers to meet
    OEMs needs more economically and more efficiently.
 
    Shift of Design and Engineering to
    Suppliers.  OEMs are focusing their efforts on
    brand development and overall vehicle design, instead of the
    design of individual vehicle systems. OEMs are increasingly
    looking to their suppliers to provide suggestions for new
    products, designs, engineering developments and manufacturing
    processes. As a result, strategic suppliers are gaining
    increased access to confidential planning information regarding
    OEMs future vehicle designs and manufacturing processes.
    Systems and modules increase the importance of strategic
    suppliers because they generally increase the percentage of
    vehicle content.
 
    Broad Manufacturing Capabilities.  With respect
    to commercial vehicle interiors, OEMs are requiring their
    suppliers to manufacture interior systems and products utilizing
    alternative materials and processes in order to meet OEMs
    demand for customized styling or cost requirements. In addition,
    while OEMs seek to differentiate their vehicles through the
    introduction of innovative interior features, suppliers are
    proactively developing new interior products with enhanced
    features.
 
    Ongoing Supplier Consolidation.  We believe the
    worldwide commercial vehicle supply industry is continuing to
    consolidate as suppliers seek to achieve operating synergies
    through business combinations, shift production to locations
    with more flexible work rules and practices, acquire
    complementary technologies, build stronger customer
    relationships and follow their OEM customers as they expand
    globally. Suppliers need to provide OEMs with single-point
    sourcing of integrated systems and modules on a global basis,
    and this is expected to drive further industry consolidation.
    Furthermore, the cost focus of most major OEMs has forced
    suppliers to reduce costs and improve productivity on an ongoing
    basis, including economies of scale through consolidation.
 
    Competitive
    Strengths
 
    We believe that our competitive strengths include, but are not
    limited to, the following:
 
    Leading Market Positions and Brands.  We
    believe that we are the leading supplier of seating systems and
    soft interior trim products, the only non-captive manufacturer
    of Class 8 truck body systems (which includes cab body
    assemblies) for the North American commercial vehicle
    heavy-truck market and one of the largest global suppliers of
    construction vehicle seating systems. Our products are marketed
    under brand names that are well known by our customers and truck
    fleet operators based upon the amount of revenue we derive from
    sales to these
    
    6
 
    markets. These brands include KAB Seating, National Seating,
    Trim Systems, Sprague Controls, Sprague
    Devices®,
    Prutsmantm,
    Moto
    Mirror®,
    RoadWatch®,
    and
    Mayflower®.
 
    Comprehensive Cab Product and Cab System
    Solutions.  We believe that we offer the broadest
    product range of any commercial vehicle cab supplier. We
    manufacture a broad base of products, many of which are critical
    to the interior and exterior subsystems of a commercial vehicle
    cab. We believe we are the only supplier worldwide with the
    capability to manufacture and offer complete cab systems in
    sequence, integrating interior trim and seats with the cab
    structure and the electronic wire harness and instrument panel
    assemblies. We also utilize a variety of different processes,
    such as urethane molding, injection molding, Virtual Engineered
    Composites (VEC) large composite molding,
    thermoforming and twin-sheet vacuum forming that
    enable us to meet each customers unique styling and cost
    requirements. The breadth of our product offering enables us to
    provide a one-stop shop for our customers, who
    increasingly require complete cab solutions from a single supply
    source. As a result, we believe that we have a substantial
    opportunity for further customer penetration through
    cross-selling initiatives and by bundling our products to
    provide complete system solutions.
 
    End-User Focused Product Innovation.  We
    believe that commercial vehicle market OEMs continue to focus on
    interior and exterior product design, comfort and features to
    better serve their end user, the driver, and our customers are
    seeking suppliers that can provide product innovation. We have a
    full service engineering and product development organization to
    assist OEMs in meeting their needs which helps enable us to
    secure content on current platforms and models.
 
    Flexible Manufacturing Capabilities and Cost Competitive
    Position.  Because commercial vehicle OEMs permit
    their customers to select from an extensive menu of cab options,
    our customers frequently request modified products in low
    volumes within a limited time frame. We have a highly variable
    cost structure and can efficiently leverage our flexible
    manufacturing capabilities to provide low volume, customized
    products to meet each customers styling, cost and
    just-in-time
    delivery requirements. We manufacture or assemble our products
    at facilities in North America, Europe, China and Australia.
    Several of our facilities are located near our customers to
    reduce distribution costs and to maintain a high level of
    customer service and flexibility.
 
    Global Capabilities.  Because many of our
    customers manufacture and sell their products on a global basis,
    we believe we have a strong competitive advantage by having
    dedicated sales, engineering, manufacturing and assembly
    capabilities on a global basis. We have these capabilities to
    support our customers in North America, Europe, China and
    Australia.
 
    Strong Free Cash Flow Generation.  Our business
    generates strong free cash flow, as it benefits from modest
    capital expenditure and working capital requirements. Over the
    three years ended December 31, 2007, our consolidated
    capital expenditures averaged $20.1 million per year, which
    amounts to approximately 2.5% of consolidated net revenues.
 
    Strong Relationships with Leading Customers and Major
    Fleets.  Because of our comprehensive product
    offerings, brand names and innovative product features, we
    believe we are an important long-term global supplier to many of
    the leading heavy-truck, construction and specialty commercial
    vehicle manufacturers such as Paccar, International,
    Caterpillar, Freightliner, Volvo/Mack., Oshkosh Truck, Komatsu
    and Deere & Co. In addition, through our sales force
    and engineering teams, we maintain active relationships with the
    major heavy-duty truck fleet organizations that are end users of
    our products such as Yellow Roadway Corp., Swift Transportation,
    Schneider National and Ryder Leasing. As a result of our
    high-quality, innovative products, well-recognized brand names
    and customer service, a majority of the largest 100 fleet
    operators specifically request certain of our products.
 
    Significant Barriers to Entry.  We believe we
    are a leader in providing critical cab assemblies and components
    to long running platforms. Considerable barriers to entry exist,
    including significant investment and engineering requirements,
    stringent technical and manufacturing requirements, high
    transition costs for OEMs to shift production to new suppliers,
    just-in-time
    delivery requirements and strong brand name recognition.
 
    Proven Management Team.  Our management team is
    highly respected within the commercial vehicle market, and our
    six senior executive officers have a combined average of
    28 years of experience in the industry. We believe that our
    team has substantial depth in critical operational areas and has
    demonstrated success in reducing costs, integrating business
    acquisitions and improving processes through cyclical periods.
    
    7
 
    Strategy
 
    Our primary growth strategies are as follows:
 
    Increase Content, Expand Customer Penetration and Leverage
    System Opportunities.  We believe we are the only
    integrated commercial vehicle supplier that can offer complete
    interior cab systems. We are focused on securing additional
    sales from our existing customer base, and we actively
    cross-market a diverse portfolio of products to our customers to
    increase our content on the cabs manufactured by these OEMs. To
    complement our North American capabilities and enhance our
    customer relationships, we are working with OEMs as they
    increase their focus on international markets. We have
    established operations in Europe and Asia and are aggressively
    working to secure new business from both existing and new
    customers. We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on
    the migration toward commercial vehicle suppliers that can offer
    a complete cab systems, solutions and components.
 
    Leverage Our New Product Development
    Capabilities.  We have made a significant
    investment in our engineering capabilities and new product
    development in order to anticipate the evolving demands of our
    customers and end users. For example, we recently launched a new
    integrated sleeper cab with one of our largest customers
    utilizing a highly automated robotic assembly system. Products
    for this program include all major Class A exterior
    stampings, roof assembly and full body
    E-coat. In
    addition, we recently developed and launched key products for a
    new military specialty vehicle platform including driver,
    co-driver and passenger seating as well as interior headliners
    and windshield wiper systems. We will continue to design and
    develop new products that add or improve content and increase
    cab comfort and safety.
 
    Capitalize on Operating Leverage.  We
    continuously seek ways to lower costs, enhance product quality,
    improve manufacturing efficiencies and increase product
    throughput and we continue to implement our Lean Manufacturing
    and Total Quality Production Systems (TQPS)
    programs. We believe our ongoing cost saving initiatives and
    sourcing efforts in Europe and Asia will enable us to continue
    to lower our manufacturing costs. As a result, we believe we are
    well positioned to improve our operating margins and capitalize
    on any volume increases with minimal additional capital
    expenditures.
 
    Grow Sales to the Aftermarket.  While
    commercial vehicles have a relatively long life, certain
    components, such as seats, wipers and mirrors, are replaced more
    frequently. We believe that there are opportunities to leverage
    our brand recognition to increase our sales to the replacement
    aftermarket. Since many aftermarket participants are small and
    locally focused, we plan to leverage our national presence to
    increase our market share in the fragmented aftermarket. We
    believe that the continued growth in the aftermarket represents
    an attractive opportunity to diversify our business due to its
    relative stability as well as the market penetration opportunity.
 
    Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Continue to Diversify
    Revenues.  We will selectively pursue
    complementary strategic acquisitions that allow us to leverage
    the marketing, engineering and manufacturing strengths of our
    business and expand our revenues to new and existing customers.
    The markets in which we operate are fragmented and provide for
    consolidation opportunities. Our acquisitions have enabled us to
    become a global supplier with the capability to offer complete
    cab systems in sequence, integrating interior trim and seats
    with the cab structure, to provide integrated electronic systems
    into our cab products and to expand the breadth of our interior
    systems capabilities. In addition, these acquisitions have
    allowed us to diversify our revenue base by customer, market,
    location or product offering.
 
    Products
 
    We offer OEMs a broad range of products and system solutions for
    a variety of end market vehicle applications that include local
    and long-haul commercial truck, construction, bus, agricultural,
    military, end market industrial, marine, municipal, recreation
    and specialty vehicle. We believe fleets and OEMs continue to
    focus on cabs and interiors to differentiate their products and
    improve driver comfort and retention. Although a portion of our
    products are sold directly to OEMs as finished components, we
    use most of our products to produce systems or
    subsystems, which are groups of component parts
    located throughout the vehicle that operate together to provide
    a specific vehicle function. Systems currently produced by us
    include cab bodies, sleeper boxes, seating, trim, body panels,
    storage cabinets, floor covering, mirrors, windshield wipers,
    headliners, window lifts, door locks,
    
    8
 
    temperature measurement and wire harnesses. We classify our
    products into five general categories: (1) seats and
    seating systems, (2) trim systems and components,
    (3) mirrors, wipers and controls, (4) cab structures,
    sleeper boxes, body panels and structural components and
    (5) electronic wire harnesses and panel assemblies.
 
    See Notes 2 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements
    in Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for information on our significant customer revenues and related
    receivables, as well as revenues by product category and
    geographical location.
 
    Set forth below is a brief description of our products and their
    applications:
 
    Seats and Seating Systems.  We design,
    engineer and produce seating systems primarily for heavy trucks
    in North America and for commercial vehicles used in the
    construction and agricultural industries through our European
    and Asian operations. For the most part, our seats and seating
    systems are fully-assembled and ready for installation when they
    are delivered to the OEM. We offer a wide range of seats that
    include air suspension seats, static seats and bus seats. As a
    result of our strong product design and product technology, we
    are a leader in designing seats with convenience features and
    enhanced safety. Seats and seating systems are the most complex
    and highly specialized products of our five product categories.
 
    Heavy Truck Seats.  We produce seats and
    seating systems for heavy trucks in our North American
    operations. Our heavy truck seating systems are designed to
    achieve maximum driver comfort by adding a wide range of manual
    and power features such as lumbar supports, cushion and back
    bolsters and leg and thigh supports. Our heavy truck seats are
    highly specialized based on a variety of different seating
    options offered in OEM product lines. Our seats are built to
    customer specifications in low volumes and consequently are
    produced in numerous combinations with a wide range of price
    points.
 
    We differentiate our seats from our competitors seats by
    focusing on three principal goals: driver comfort, driver
    retention and decreased workers compensation claims.
    Drivers of heavy trucks recognize and are often given the
    opportunity to specify their choice of seat brands, and we
    strive to develop strong customer loyalty both with the
    commercial vehicle OEMs and among drivers. We believe that we
    have superior technology and can offer a unique seat base that
    is ergonomically designed, accommodates a range of driver sizes
    and absorbs shock to maximize driver comfort.
 
    Construction and Other Commercial Vehicle
    Seats.  We produce seats and seating systems for
    commercial vehicles used in the global construction and
    agricultural, bus, military, commercial transport and municipal
    industries. The principal focus of these seating systems is
    durability. These seats are ergonomically designed for difficult
    working environments, to provide comfort and control throughout
    the range of seats and chairs.
 
    Other Seating Products.  We also manufacture
    office seating products. Our office chair was developed as a
    result of our experience supplying chairs for the heavy truck,
    agricultural and construction industries and is fully adjustable
    to maximize comfort at work. Our office chairs are available in
    a wide variety of colors and fabrics to suit many different
    office environments, such as emergency services, call centers,
    receptions, studios, boardrooms and general office.
 
    Trim Systems and Components.  We design,
    engineer and produce trim systems and components for the
    interior cabs of commercial vehicles. Our interior trim products
    are designed to provide a comfortable interior for the vehicle
    occupants as well as a variety of functional and safety
    features. The wide variety of features that can be selected by
    the heavy truck customer makes trim systems and components a
    complex and highly specialized product category. Set forth below
    is a brief description of our principal trim systems and
    components:
 
    Trim Products.  Our trim products include
    A-Pillars, B-Pillars, door panels and interior trim panels. Door
    panels and interior trim panels consist of several component
    parts that are attached to a substrate. Specific components
    include vinyl or cloth-covered appliqués, armrests, map
    pocket compartments, carpet and sound-reducing insulation. Our
    products are attractive, lightweight solutions from a
    traditional cut and sew approach to a contemporary
    molded styling theme. The parts can be color matched
    or top good wrapped to integrate seamlessly with the rest of the
    interior.
    
    9
 
    Instrument Panels.  We produce and assemble
    instrument panels that can be integrated with the rest of the
    interior trim. The instrument panel is a complex system of
    coverings and foam, plastic and metal parts designed to house
    various components and act as a safety device for the vehicle
    occupant.
 
    Body Panels (Headliners/Wall
    Panels).  Headliners consist of a substrate and a
    finished interior layer made of fabrics and materials. While
    headliners are an important contributor to interior aesthetics,
    they also provide insulation from road noise and can serve as
    carriers for a variety of other components, such as visors,
    overhead consoles, grab handles, coat hooks, electrical wiring,
    speakers, lighting and other electronic and electrical products.
    As the amount of electronic and electrical content available in
    vehicles has increased, headliners have emerged as an important
    carrier of electronic features such as lighting systems.
 
    Storage Systems.  Our modular storage units and
    custom cabinetry are designed to improve comfort and convenience
    for the driver. These storage systems are designed to be
    integrated with the interior trim. These units may be easily
    expanded and customized with features that include
    refrigerators, sinks and water reservoirs. Our storage systems
    are constructed with durable materials and designed to last the
    life of the vehicle.
 
    Floor Covering Systems.  We have an extensive
    and comprehensive portfolio of floor covering systems and dash
    insulators. Carpet flooring systems generally consist of tufted
    or non-woven carpet with a thermoplastic backcoating which, when
    heated, allows the carpet to be fitted precisely to the interior
    or trunk compartment of the vehicle. Additional insulation
    materials are added to minimize noise, vibration and harshness.
    Non-carpeted flooring systems, used primarily in commercial and
    fleet vehicles, offer improved wear and maintenance
    characteristics. The dash insulator separates the passenger
    compartment from the engine compartment and prevents engine
    noise and heat from entering the passenger compartment.
 
    Sleeper Bunks.  We offer a wide array of design
    choices for upper and lower sleeper bunks for heavy trucks. All
    parts of our sleeper bunks can be integrated to match the rest
    of the interior trim. Our sleeper bunks arrive at OEMs fully
    assembled and ready for installation.
 
    Grab Handles and Armrests.  Our grab handles
    and armrests are designed and engineered with specific attention
    to aesthetics, ergonomics and strength. Our products use a wide
    range of inserts and substrates for structural integrity. The
    integral urethane skin offers a soft touch and can be in-mold
    coated to specific colors.
 
    Privacy Curtains.  We produce privacy curtains
    for use in sleeper cabs. Our privacy curtains include features
    such as integrated color matching of both sides of the curtain,
    choice of cloth or vinyl, full black out features
    and low-weight.
 
    Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  We
    design, engineer and produce a wide range of mirrors, wipers and
    controls used in commercial vehicles. Set forth below is a brief
    description of our principal products in this category:
 
    Mirrors.  We offer a wide range of round,
    rectangular, motorized and heated mirrors and related hardware,
    including brackets, braces and side bars. Most of our mirror
    designs utilize stainless steel body, fasteners and support
    braces to ensure durability. We have introduced both road and
    outside temperature devices that are integrated into the mirror
    face or the vehicles dashboard through our
    RoadWatchtm
    family of products. These systems are principally utilized by
    municipalities throughout North America to monitor surface
    temperatures and assist them in dispersing chemicals for snow
    and ice removal.
 
    Windshield Wiper Systems.  We offer
    application-specific windshield wiper systems and individual
    windshield wiper components for all segments of the commercial
    vehicle market. Our windshield wiper systems are generally
    delivered to the OEM fully assembled and ready for installation.
    A windshield wiper system is typically comprised of an electric
    motor, linkages, arms, wiper blades, washer reservoirs and
    related pneumatic or electric pumps. We also supply air-assisted
    washing systems for headlights and cameras to assist drivers
    with visibility for safe vehicle operation. These systems
    utilize window wash fluid and air to create a turbulent
    liquid/air stream that removes road grime from headlights and
    cameras. We offer an optional programmable washing system that
    allows for periodic washing and dry cycles for maximum safety.
 
    Controls.  We offer a range of controls and
    control systems that includes a complete line of window lifts
    and door locks, mechanic, pneumatic, electrical and electronic
    HVAC controls and electric switch products. We
    
    10
 
    specialize in air-powered window lifts and door locks, which are
    highly reliable and cost effective as compared to similar
    electrical products.
 
    Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components.  We design, engineer and produce
    complete cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and
    structural components for the commercial vehicle industry in
    North America. Set forth below is a description of our principal
    products in this category:
 
    Cab Structures.  We design, manufacture and
    assemble complete cab structures used primarily in heavy trucks
    for the major commercial vehicle OEMs in North America. Our cab
    structures, which are manufactured from both steel and aluminum,
    are delivered to our customers fully assembled and primed for
    paint. Our cab structures are built to order based upon options
    selected by the vehicles end-users and delivered to the
    OEMs, in line sequence, as these end-users trucks are
    manufactured by the OEMs.
 
    Sleeper Boxes.  We design, manufacture and
    assemble sleeper boxes primarily for heavy trucks in North
    America. We manufacture both integrated sleeper boxes that are
    part of the overall cab structure as well as stand alone
    assemblies depending on the customer application. Sleeper boxes
    are typically constructed using aluminum exterior panels in
    combination with steel structural components delivered to our
    customers in line sequence after the final seal and
    E-coat
    process.
 
    Bumper Fascias, Fender Covers and Fender
    Liners.  Our highly durable, lightweight bumper
    fascias and fender covers and liners are capable of withstanding
    repeated impacts that could deform an aluminum or steel bumper.
    We utilize a production technique that chemically bonds a layer
    of paint to the part after it has been molded, thereby enabling
    the part to keep its appearance even after repeated impacts.
 
    Body Panels and Structural Components.  We
    produce a wide range of both steel and aluminum large exterior
    body panels and structural components for the internal
    production of our cab structures and sleeper boxes as well as
    being sold externally to certain commercial vehicle OEMs. In
    addition, we also manufacture composite body panels utilizing
    our virtual engineered composite (VEC) technology.
 
    Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  We produce a wide range of
    electronic wire harnesses and related assemblies as well as
    panel assemblies used in commercial vehicles and other
    equipment. Set forth below is a brief description of our
    principal products in this category.
 
    Electronic Wire Harnesses.  We offer a broad
    range of complex electronic wire harness assemblies that
    function as the primary current carrying devices used to provide
    electrical interconnections for gauges, lights, control
    functions, power circuits and other electronic applications on a
    commercial vehicle. Our wire harnesses are highly customized to
    fit specific end-user requirements. We provide our wire
    harnesses for a wide variety of commercial vehicles, military
    vehicles, specialty trucks, automotive and other specialty
    applications, including heavy-industrial equipment.
 
    Panel Assemblies.  We assemble large,
    integrated components such as panel assemblies and cabinets for
    commercial vehicle OEMs and other heavy equipment manufacturers.
    The panels and cabinets we assemble are installed in key
    locations on a vehicle or unit of equipment, are integrated with
    our wire harness assemblies and provide user control over
    certain operational functions and features.
 
    Manufacturing
 
    A description of the manufacturing processes we utilize for each
    of our principal product categories is set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Seats and Seating Systems.  Our seating
    operations utilize a variety of manufacturing techniques whereby
    foam and various other components along with fabric, vinyl or
    leather are affixed to an underlying seat frame. We also
    manufacture and assemble the seat frame, which involves complex
    welding. Generally, we utilize outside suppliers to produce the
    individual components used to assemble the seat frame. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Trim Systems and Components.  Our interior
    systems process capabilities include injection molding,
    low-pressure injection molding, urethane molding and foaming
    processes, compression molding, heavy-gauge thermoforming and
    vacuum forming as well as various cutting, sewing, trimming and
    finishing methods. | 
    
    11
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  We manufacture
    our mirrors, wipers and controls utilizing a variety of
    manufacturing processes and techniques. Our mirrors, wipers and
    controls are primarily hand assembled, tested and packaged. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components. We utilize a wide range of manufacturing
    processes to produce the majority of the steel and aluminum
    stampings used in our cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels
    and structural components and a variety of both robotic and
    manual welding techniques in the assembly of these products. In
    addition, both our Norwalk, Ohio and Kings Mountain, North
    Carolina facilities have large capacity, fully automated
    E-coat paint
    priming systems allowing us to provide our customers with a
    paint-ready cab product. Due to their high cost, full body
    E-coat
    systems, such as ours, are rarely found outside of the
    manufacturing operations of the major OEMs. The major large
    press lines at our Shadyside, Ohio facility provide us with the
    in-house manufacturing flexibility for both aluminum and steel
    stampings delivered
    just-in-time
    to our cab assembly plants. This plant also provides us with low
    volume forming and processing techniques including laser trim
    operations that minimize investment and time to manufacture for
    low volume applications. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  We utilize several manufacturing
    techniques to produce the majority of our electronic wire
    harnesses and panel assemblies. Our processes, both manual and
    automated, are designed to produce complex, low- to
    medium-volume wire harnesses and panel assemblies in short time
    frames. Our wire harnesses and panel assemblies are both
    electronically and hand tested. | 
 
    We have a broad array of processes to offer our commercial
    vehicle OEM customers to enable us to meet their styling and
    cost requirements. The vehicle cab is the most significant and
    appealing aspect to the driver of the vehicle, and consequently
    each commercial vehicle OEM has unique requirements as to feel,
    appearance and features.
 
    The end markets for our products are highly specialized and our
    customers frequently request modified products in low volumes
    within an expedited delivery timeframe. As a result, we
    primarily utilize flexible manufacturing cells at the vast
    majority of our production facilities. Manufacturing cells are
    clusters of individual manufacturing operations and work
    stations grouped in a circular configuration, with the operators
    placed centrally within the configuration. This provides
    flexibility by allowing efficient changes to the number of
    operations each operator performs. When compared to the more
    traditional, less flexible assembly line process, cell
    manufacturing allows us to maintain our product output
    consistent with our OEM customers requirements and reduce
    the level of inventory.
 
    When an end-user buys a commercial vehicle, the end-user will
    specify the seat and other features for that vehicle. Because
    each of our seating systems is unique, our manufacturing
    facilities have significant complexity which we manage by
    building in sequence. We build our seating systems as orders are
    received, and systems are delivered to the customers rack
    in the sequence in which vehicles come down the assembly line.
    We have systems in place that allow us to provide complete
    customized interior kits in boxes that are delivered in
    sequence, and we intend to expand upon these systems such that
    we will be able to provide, in sequence, fully integrated
    modular systems combining the cab body and interior and seating
    systems.
 
    In many instances, we keep track of our build sequence by
    vehicle identification number and components are identified by
    bar code. Sequencing reduces our cost of production because it
    eliminates warehousing costs and reduces waste and obsolescence,
    offsetting any increased labor costs. Several of our
    manufacturing facilities are strategically located near our
    customers assembly plants, which facilitates this process
    and minimizes shipping costs.
 
    We employ
    just-in-time
    manufacturing and system sourcing in our operations to meet
    customer requirements for faster deliveries and to minimize our
    need to carry significant inventory levels. We utilize material
    systems to manage inventory levels and, in certain locations, we
    have inventory delivered as often as two times per day from a
    nearby facility based on the previous days order. This
    eliminates the need to carry excess inventory at our facilities.
 
    Typically, in a strong economy, new vehicle production increases
    and greater funding is available to be spent on enhancements to
    the truck interior. As demand goes up, the mix of our products
    shifts towards more expensive systems, such as sleeper units,
    with enhanced features and higher quality materials. The shift
    from low-end units to
    
    12
 
    high-end units amplifies the positive effect a strong economy
    has on our business. Conversely, when economic conditions and
    indicators decline and customers shift away from ordering
    high-end units with enhanced features, our business is adversely
    affected from both lower volume and lower pricing. We strive to
    manage down cycles by running our facilities at capacity while
    maintaining the capability and flexibility to expand. We have
    plans to work with our employees and rely on their involvement
    to help minimize problems and re-align our capacity during
    fluctuating periods of increased or decreased production levels
    to achieve on-time delivery.
 
    As a means to enhance our operations, we continue to implement
    TQPS throughout our operations. TQPS is our customized version
    of Lean Manufacturing and consists of a 32 hour interactive
    class that is taught exclusively by members of our management
    team. A significant portion of the labor efficiencies we gained
    over the past few years is due to the program. TQPS is an
    analytical process in which we analyze each of our manufacturing
    cells and identify the most efficient process to improve
    efficiency and quality. The goal is to achieve total cost
    management and continuous improvement. Some examples of
    TQPS-related improvements are: reduced labor to move parts
    around the facility, clear walking paths in and around
    manufacturing cells and increased safety. An ongoing goal is to
    reduce the time employees spend waiting for materials within a
    facility. In an effort to increase operational efficiency,
    improve product quality and provide additional capacity, we
    intend to continue to implement TQPS improvements at each of our
    manufacturing facilities.
 
    Raw
    Materials and Suppliers
 
    A description of the principal raw materials we utilize for each
    of our principal product categories is set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Seats and Seating Systems.  The principal raw
    materials used in our seat systems include steel, aluminum and
    foam related products and are generally readily available and
    obtained from multiple suppliers under various supply
    agreements. Leather, vinyl, fabric and certain components are
    also purchased from multiple suppliers under supply agreements.
    Typically, our supply agreements are for a term of at least one
    year and are terminable by us for breach or convenience. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Trim Systems and Components.  The principal raw
    materials used in our interior systems processes are resin and
    chemical products, foam, vinyl and fabric which are formed and
    assembled into end products. These raw materials are obtained
    from multiple suppliers, typically under supply agreements which
    are for a term of at least one year and are terminable by us for
    breach or convenience. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  The principal
    raw materials used to manufacture our mirrors, wipers and
    controls are steel, stainless steel and rubber, which are
    generally readily available and obtained from multiple
    suppliers. We also purchase sub-assembled products such as
    motors for our wiper systems and mirrors. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components. The principal raw materials used in our cab
    structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and structural components
    are steel and aluminum, the majority of which we purchase in
    sheets and stamp at our Shadyside, Ohio facility. These raw
    materials are generally readily available and obtained from
    several suppliers, typically under purchase contracts which fix
    price and supply for up to one year. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  The principal raw materials used to
    manufacture our electronic wire harnesses are wire, connectors,
    terminals, switches, relays and braid fabric. These raw
    materials are obtained from multiple suppliers and are generally
    readily available. | 
 
    Our supply agreements generally provide for fixed pricing but do
    not require us to purchase any specified quantities. We have not
    experienced any significant shortages of raw materials and
    normally do not carry inventories of raw materials or finished
    products in excess of those reasonably required to meet
    production and shipping schedules as well as service
    requirements. Steel, aluminum, petroleum-based products, copper,
    resin, foam, fabrics, wire and wire components account for the
    most significant portion of our raw material costs. We typically
    purchase steel, copper and petroleum-based products at market
    prices, which over the last several years, have increased
    significantly. As a result, we are currently being assessed
    surcharges and price increases on certain of our purchases of
    steel, copper and petroleum-related products. We continue to
    work with our customers and
    
    13
 
    suppliers to minimize the impact of such surcharges while
    working diligently to minimize the impacts of such increases.
    Certain component purchases and suppliers are directed by our
    customers. We do not believe we are dependent on a single
    supplier or limited group of suppliers for our raw materials.
 
    Customers
    and Marketing
 
    We sell our products principally to the commercial vehicle OEM
    truck market. Approximately 41% of our 2007 revenues and
    approximately 60% of our 2006 revenues were derived from sales
    to commercial vehicle truck OEMs, with the remainder of our
    revenues being generated principally from sales to the
    construction, aftermarket and OEM service markets.
 
    We supply our products primarily to the heavy truck OEM market,
    construction market, the aftermarket and OEM service segment and
    other commercial vehicle and specialty markets. The following is
    a summary of our revenues by end-user market for the three years
    ended December 31:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Heavy Truck OEM
 |  |  | 41 | % |  |  | 60 | % |  |  | 62 | % | 
| 
    Construction
 |  |  | 26 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 15 |  | 
| 
    Aftermarket and OEM Service
 |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 9 |  | 
| 
    Military
 |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Bus
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Agriculture
 |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Other
 |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 9 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
 |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The change in revenues by end market in 2007 is primarily
    related to the decreased demand in the North American
    (Class 8) heavy truck market.
 
    Our principal customers in North America include PACCAR,
    International, Caterpillar, Freightliner and Volvo/ Mack. We
    believe we are an important long-term supplier to all leading
    truck manufacturers in North America because of our
    comprehensive product offerings, leading brand names and product
    innovation. In our European, China and Australian operations,
    our principal customers in the commercial vehicle market include
    Caterpillar, Volvo/Mack, Komatsu, Hitachi, CNH Global (Case New
    Holland) and JCB Limited.
 
    The following is a summary of our significant revenues by OEM
    customer for the three years ended December 31:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    PACCAR
 |  |  | 14 | % |  |  | 17 | % |  |  | 17 | % | 
| 
    International
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 19 |  | 
| 
    Caterpillar
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Freightliner
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 16 |  | 
| 
    Volvo/Mack
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 14 |  | 
| 
    Oshkosh Truck
 |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Komatsu
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Deere & Co. 
 |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Other
 |  |  | 32 |  |  |  | 21 |  |  |  | 21 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
 |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Except as set forth in the above table, no other customer
    accounted for more than 10% of our revenues for the three years
    ended December 31, 2007. The change in revenues by
    significant OEM customers in 2007 is primarily related to the
    decreased demand in the North American (Class 8) heavy
    truck market.
    
    14
 
    Our European, China, Australian and Mexican operations
    collectively contributed approximately 23%, 13% and 16% of our
    revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
    2005, respectively. The change in revenue by geographic location
    in 2007 is primarily related to the decreased demand in the
    North American (Class 8) heavy truck market as well as
    the impact of the CIEB and PEKM acquisitions.
 
    Our OEM customers generally source business to us pursuant to
    written contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments in
    terms of price, quality, technology and delivery. Awarded
    business generally covers the supply of all or a portion of a
    customers production and service requirements for a
    particular product program rather than the supply of a specific
    quantity of products. In general, these contracts, purchase
    orders and commitments provide that the customer can terminate
    the contract, purchase order or commitment if we do not meet
    specified quality, delivery and cost requirements. Such
    contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments generally
    extend for the entire life of a platform, which is typically
    five to seven years. Although these contracts, purchase orders
    or other commitments may be terminated at any time by our
    customers (but not by us), such terminations have been minimal
    and have not had a material impact on our results of operations.
    In order to reduce our reliance on any one vehicle model, we
    produce products for a broad cross-section of both new and more
    established models.
 
    Our contracts with our major OEM customers generally provide for
    an annual productivity cost reduction. These reductions are
    calculated on an annual basis as a percentage of the previous
    years purchases by each customer. The reduction is
    achieved through engineering changes, material cost reductions,
    logistics savings, reductions in packaging cost and labor
    efficiencies. Historically, most of these cost reductions have
    been offset by both internal reductions and through the
    assistance of our supply base, although no assurances can be
    given that we will be able to achieve such reductions in the
    future. If the annual reduction targets are not achieved, the
    difference is recovered through price reductions. Our cost
    structure is comprised of a high percentage of variable costs
    that provides us with additional flexibility during economic
    cycles.
 
    Our sales and marketing efforts with respect to our OEM sales
    are designed to create overall awareness of our engineering,
    design and manufacturing capabilities and to enable us to be
    selected to supply products for new and redesigned models by our
    OEM customers. Our sales and marketing staff works closely with
    our design and engineering personnel to prepare the materials
    used for bidding on new business as well as to provide a
    consistent interface between us and our key customers. We
    currently have sales and marketing personnel located in every
    major region in which we operate. From time to time, we also
    participate in industry trade shows and advertise in industry
    publications. One of our ongoing initiatives is to negotiate and
    enter into long term supply agreements with our existing
    customers that allow us to leverage all of our business and
    provide a complete cab system to our commercial vehicle OEM
    customers.
 
    Our principal customers for our aftermarket sales include OEM
    dealers and independent wholesale distributors. Our sales and
    marketing efforts for our aftermarket sales are focused on
    support of these two distribution chains, as well as direct
    contact with all major fleets.
 
    Backlog
 
    We do not generally obtain long-term, firm purchase orders from
    our customers. Rather, our customers typically place annual
    blanket purchase orders, but these orders do not obligate them
    to purchase any specific or minimum amount of products from us
    until a release is issued by the customer under the blanket
    purchase order. Releases are typically placed within 30 to
    90 days of required delivery and may be canceled at any
    time, in which case the customer would be liable for work in
    process and finished goods. We do not believe that our backlog
    of expected product sales covered by firm purchase orders is a
    meaningful indicator of future sales since orders may be
    rescheduled or canceled.
 
    Competition
 
    Within each of our principal product categories, we compete with
    a variety of independent suppliers and with OEMs in-house
    operations, primarily on the basis of price, breadth of product
    offerings, product quality, technical expertise, development
    capability, product delivery and product service. We believe we
    are the only supplier in the North American commercial vehicle
    market that can offer complete cab systems in sequence
    integrating interior
    
    15
 
    systems (including seats, interior trim and flooring systems),
    mirrors and wire harnesses with the cab structure. A summary of
    our estimated market position and primary independent
    competitors is set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Seats and Seating Systems.  We believe that we
    have the number one market position in North America supplying
    seats and seating systems to the commercial vehicle heavy-truck
    market. We also believe that we have the number one market
    position in supplying seats and seating systems to commercial
    vehicles used in the medium/heavy construction equipment
    industry on a worldwide basis. Our primary independent
    competitors in the North American commercial vehicle market
    include Sears Manufacturing Company, Accuride Corporation,
    Grammer AG and Seats, Inc., and our primary competitors in the
    European commercial vehicle market include Grammer AG and
    Isringhausen. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Trim Systems and Components.  We believe that
    we have the number one market position in the North American
    commercial vehicle heavy-truck market with respect to our soft
    interior trim products and a leading presence in the hard
    interior trim market. We face competition from a number of
    different competitors with respect to each of our trim system
    products and components. Overall, our primary independent
    competitors are ConMet, Fabriform, TPI, Findlay, Superior, Trim
    Masters, Inc., Blachford Ltd. and Mitras. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.  We believe that
    we are a leading supplier in the North American commercial
    vehicle heavy-truck market with respect to our windshield wiper
    systems and mirrors. We face competition from a number of
    different competitors with respect to each of our principal
    products in this category. Our principal competitors for mirrors
    are Hadley, Lang-Mekra and Trucklite, and our principal
    competitors for windshield wiper systems are Johnson Electric,
    Trico and Valeo. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
    Components.  We believe we are the leading
    non-captive supplier in the North American commercial vehicle
    heavy-truck market with respect to our cab structural
    components, cab structures, sleeper boxes and body panels. Our
    principal competitors are Magna, Ogihara Corporation,
    Spartanburg Stamping, Able Body and Defiance Metal Products. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel
    Assemblies.  We believe that we are a leading
    supplier of low- to medium-volume complex, electronic wire
    harnesses and related assemblies used in the global heavy
    equipment, commercial vehicle, heavy-truck and specialty and
    military vehicle markets. Our principal competitors for
    electronic wire harnesses include large diversified suppliers
    such as AFL, Delphi, Leoni, Nexans, PKC, Stoneridge, Yazaki and
    smaller independent companies such as Fargo Assembly and
    Unlimited Services. | 
 
    Research
    and Development, Design and Engineering
 
    Our objective is to be a leader in offering superior quality and
    technologically advanced products to our customers at
    competitive prices. We engage in ongoing engineering and
    research and development activities to improve the reliability,
    performance and cost-effectiveness of our existing products and
    to design and develop new products for existing and new
    applications.
 
    We generally work with our customers engineering and
    development teams at the beginning of the design process for new
    components and assemblies, or the redesign process for existing
    components and assemblies, in order to maximize production
    efficiency and quality. These processes may take place from one
    to three years prior to the commencement of production. On
    average, the development time for a new component takes between
    12 and 24 months during the design phase, while the
    re-engineering of an existing part may take between one and six
    months. Early design involvement can result in a product that
    meets or exceeds the customers design and performance
    requirements and is more efficient to manufacture. In addition,
    our extensive involvement enhances our position for bidding on
    such business. We work aggressively to ensure that our quality
    and delivery metrics distinguish us from our competitors.
 
    We focus on bringing our customers integrated products that have
    superior content, comfort and safety. Consistent with our
    value-added engineering focus, we place a large emphasis on the
    relationships with the engineering departments of our customers.
    These relationships not only help us to identify new business
    
    16
 
    opportunities but also enable us to compete based on the quality
    of our products and services, rather than exclusively on price.
 
    We are currently involved in the design stage of several
    products for our customers and expect to begin production of
    these products in the years 2008 to 2012.
 
    Intellectual
    Property
 
    We consider ourselves to be a leader in both product and process
    technology, and, therefore, protection of intellectual property
    is important to our business. Our principal intellectual
    property consists of product and process technology, a limited
    number of United States and foreign patents, trade secrets,
    trademarks and copyrights. Although our intellectual property is
    important to our business operations and in the aggregate
    constitutes a valuable asset, we do not believe that any single
    patent, trade secret, trademark or copyright, or group of
    patents, trade secrets, trademarks or copyrights is critical to
    the success of our business. Our policy is to seek statutory
    protection for all significant intellectual property embodied in
    patents, trademarks and copyrights. From time to time, we grant
    licenses under our patents and technology and receive licenses
    under patents and technology of others.
 
    We market our products under brand names that include KAB
    Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems and Sprague Controls,
    Sprague
    Devices®,
    Prutsmantm,
    Moto
    Mirror®,
    RoadWatch®,
    and
    Mayflower®.
    We believe that our brands are valuable and are increasing in
    value with the growth of our business, but that our business is
    not dependent on such brands. We own U.S. federal trademark
    registrations for several of our brands.
 
    Seasonality
 
    OEMs production requirements can fluctuate as the demand
    for new vehicles soften during the holiday seasons in North
    America, Europe and Asia as OEM manufacturers generally close
    their production facilities at various times during the year.
 
    Employees
 
    As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately 6,410
    permanent employees, of which approximately 18% were salaried
    and the remainder were hourly. Approximately 43% of the
    employees in our North American operations were unionized, and
    approximately 48% of our employees at our Europe and Asia
    operations were represented by shop steward committees. We have
    not experienced any material strikes, lockouts or work stoppages
    during 2007 and consider our relationship with our employees to
    be satisfactory. On an as needed basis during peak periods,
    contract and temporary employees are utilized.
 
    Available
    Information
 
    We maintain a website on the Internet at www.cvgrp.com. We make
    available free of charge through our website, by way of a
    hyperlink to a third-party Securities Exchange Commission (SEC)
    filing website, our Annual Reports on
    Form 10-K,
    quarterly reports on
    Form 10-Q,
    current reports on
    Form 8-K
    and amendments to those reports electronically filed or
    furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Exchange Act of 1934. Such information is available as soon as
    such reports are filed with the SEC. Additionally, our Code of
    Ethics may be accessed within the Investor Relations section of
    our website. Information found on our website is not part of
    this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    or any other report filed with the SEC.
 
 
    You should carefully consider the risks described below before
    making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties
    described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
    and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
    deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.
    
    17
 
    If any of these certain risks and uncertainties were to actually
    occur, our business, financial condition or results of
    operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case,
    the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may
    lose all or part of your investment. These risks and
    uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Volatility and cyclicality in the commercial vehicle market
    could adversely affect us. | 
 
    Our profitability depends in part on the varying conditions in
    the commercial vehicle market. This market is subject to
    considerable volatility as it moves in response to cycles in the
    overall business environment and is particularly sensitive to
    the industrial sector, which generates a significant portion of
    the freight tonnage hauled. Sales of commercial vehicles have
    historically been cyclical, with demand affected by such
    economic factors as industrial production, construction levels,
    demand for consumer durable goods, interest rates and fuel
    costs. For example, North American commercial vehicle sales and
    production experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 due to a
    confluence of events that included a weak economy, an oversupply
    of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on
    commercial vehicles and equipment. In addition, North American
    commercial vehicle sales and production experienced a downturn
    during 2007 as a result of pre-orders in 2006 and general
    weakness in the North American economy and corresponding decline
    in the need for commercial vehicles to haul freight tonnage in
    North America, among other factors. These downturns had a
    material adverse effect on our business during the same periods.
    We cannot provide any assurance as to the length or ultimate
    level of the recovery of this decline. We expect that unit
    production of class 8 heavy trucks will not materially
    recover from 2007 levels in 2008. Nor can we predict that the
    industry will follow past cyclical patterns that might include a
    strong 2009 pre-order in advance of new emissions standards set
    to take place in 2010.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our profitability could be adversely affected if the actual
    production volumes for our customers vehicles are
    significantly lower than expected. | 
 
    We incur costs and make capital expenditures based upon
    estimates of production volumes for our customers
    vehicles. While we attempt to establish a price for our
    components and systems that will compensate for variances in
    production volumes, if the actual production of these vehicles
    is significantly less than anticipated, our gross margin on
    these products would be adversely affected. We enter into
    agreements with our customers at the beginning of a given
    platforms life to supply products for that platform. Once
    we enter into such agreements, fulfillment of our purchasing
    requirements is our obligation for the entire production life of
    the platform, with terms ranging from five to seven years, and
    we have no provisions to terminate such contracts. We may become
    committed to supply products to our customers at selling prices
    that are not sufficient to cover the direct cost to produce such
    products. We cannot predict our customers demands for our
    products either in the aggregate or for particular reporting
    periods. If customers representing a significant amount of our
    revenues were to purchase materially lower volumes than
    expected, it would have a material adverse effect on our
    business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our major OEM customers may exert significant influence over
    us. | 
 
    The commercial vehicle component supply industry has
    traditionally been highly fragmented and serves a limited number
    of large OEMs. As a result, OEMs have historically had a
    significant amount of leverage over their outside suppliers. Our
    contracts with major OEM customers generally provide for an
    annual productivity cost reduction. Historically, cost
    reductions through product design changes, increased
    productivity and similar programs with our suppliers have
    generally offset these customer-imposed productivity cost
    reduction requirements. However, if we are unable to generate
    sufficient production cost savings in the future to offset price
    reductions, our gross margin and profitability would be
    adversely affected. In addition, changes in OEMs
    purchasing policies or payment practices could have an adverse
    effect on our business.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be unable to successfully implement our business
    strategy and, as a result, our businesses and financial position
    and results of operations could be materially and adversely
    affected. | 
 
    Our ability to achieve our business and financial objectives is
    subject to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our
    control. For example, we may not be successful in implementing
    our strategy if unforeseen factors
    
    18
 
    emerge that diminish the expected growth in the commercial
    vehicle markets we supply, or we experience increased pressure
    on our margins. In addition, we may not succeed in integrating
    strategic acquisitions and our pursuit of additional strategic
    acquisitions may lead to resource constraints which could have a
    negative impact on our ability to meet customers demands,
    thereby adversely affecting our relationships with those
    customers. As a result of such business or competitive factors,
    we may decide to alter or discontinue aspects of our business
    strategy and may adopt alternative or additional strategies. Any
    failure to successfully implement our business strategy could
    adversely affect our business, results of operations and growth
    potential.
 
    Developing product innovations has been and will continue to be
    a significant part of our business strategy. We believe that it
    is important that we continue to meet our customers
    demands for product innovation, improvement and enhancement,
    including the continued development of new-generation products,
    design improvements and innovations that improve the quality and
    efficiency of our products. However, such development will
    require us to continue to invest in research and development and
    sales and marketing. In the future, we may not have sufficient
    resources to make such necessary investments, or we may be
    unable to make the technological advances necessary to carry out
    product innovations sufficient to meet our customers
    demands. We are also subject to the risks generally associated
    with product development, including lack of market acceptance,
    delays in product development and failure of products to operate
    properly. We may, as a result of these factors, be unable to
    meaningfully focus on product innovation as a strategy and may
    therefore be unable to meet our customers demands for
    product innovation.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | If we are unable to obtain raw materials at favorable prices,
    it could adversely impact our results of operations and
    financial condition. | 
 
    Numerous raw materials are used in the manufacture of our
    products. Steel, aluminum, petroleum-based products, copper,
    resin, foam, fabrics, wire and wire components account for the
    most significant portion of our raw material costs. Although we
    currently maintain alternative sources for raw materials, our
    business is subject to the risk of price increases and periodic
    delays in delivery. For example, we are currently being assessed
    surcharges as well as price increases on certain purchases of
    steel, copper and other raw materials. If we are unable to
    purchase certain raw materials required for our operations for a
    significant period of time, our operations would be disrupted,
    and our results of operations would be adversely affected. In
    addition, if we are unable to pass on the increased costs of raw
    materials to our customers, this could adversely affect our
    results of operations and financial condition.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be unable to complete additional strategic
    acquisitions or we may encounter unforeseen difficulties in
    integrating acquisitions. | 
 
    We intend to actively pursue additional acquisition targets that
    will allow us to continue to expand into new geographic markets,
    add new customers, provide new product, manufacturing and
    service capabilities and increase penetration with existing
    customers. However, we expect to face competition for
    acquisition candidates, which may limit the number of our
    acquisition opportunities and may lead to higher acquisition
    prices. Moreover, acquisitions of businesses may require
    additional debt financing, resulting in additional leverage. The
    covenants of our senior credit facility may further limit our
    ability to complete acquisitions. There can be no assurance that
    we will find attractive acquisition candidates or successfully
    integrate acquired businesses into our existing business. If we
    fail to complete additional acquisitions, we may have difficulty
    competing with more thoroughly integrated competitors and our
    results of operations could be adversely affected. To the extent
    that we do complete additional acquisitions, if the expected
    synergies from such acquisitions do not materialize or we fail
    to successfully integrate such new businesses into our existing
    businesses, our results of operations could also be adversely
    affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be adversely impacted by labor strikes, work stoppages
    and other matters. | 
 
    The hourly workforces at our Norwalk and Shadyside, Ohio
    facilities and Mexico operations are unionized. The unionized
    employees at these facilities represented approximately 43% of
    our employees in our North American operations as of
    December 31, 2007. We have experienced limited unionization
    efforts at certain of our other North American facilities from
    time to time. In addition, 48% of our employees at our Europe
    and Asia operations are represented by a shop steward committee,
    which may seek to limit our flexibility in our relationship
    
    19
 
    with these employees. We cannot assure you that we will not
    encounter future unionization efforts or other types of
    conflicts with labor unions or our employees.
 
    Many of our OEM customers and their suppliers also have
    unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slow-downs experienced
    by OEMs or their other suppliers could result in slow-downs or
    closures of assembly plants where our products are included in
    assembled commercial vehicles. In the event that one or more of
    our customers or their suppliers experience a material work
    stoppage, such work stoppage could have a material adverse
    effect on our business.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our businesses are subject to statutory environmental and
    safety regulations in multiple jurisdictions, and the impact of
    any changes in regulation
    and/or the
    violation of any applicable laws and regulations by our
    businesses could result in a material and adverse affect on our
    financial condition and results of operations. | 
 
    We are subject to foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
    regulations governing the protection of the environment and
    occupational health and safety, including laws regulating air
    emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, storage,
    handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials; the
    emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the soil,
    ground or air; and the health and safety of our colleagues. We
    are also required to obtain permits from governmental
    authorities for certain of our operations. We cannot assure you
    that we are, or have been, in complete compliance with such
    environment and safety laws, regulations and permits. If we
    violate or fail to comply with these laws, regulations or
    permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by
    regulators. In some instances, such a fine or sanction could
    have a material adverse effect on us. The environmental laws to
    which we are subject have become more stringent over time, and
    we could incur material expenses in the future to comply with
    environmental laws. We are also subject to laws imposing
    liability for the cleanup of contaminated property. Under these
    laws, we could be held liable for costs and damages relating to
    contamination at our past or present facilities and at third
    party sites to which we sent waste containing hazardous
    substances. The amount of such liability could be material.
 
    Several of our facilities are either certified as, or are in the
    process of being certified as ISO 9001, 14000, 14001 or TS16949
    (the international environmental management standard) compliant
    or are developing similar environmental management systems.
    Although we have made, and will continue to make, capital
    expenditures to implement such environmental programs and comply
    with environmental requirements, we do not expect to make
    material capital expenditures for environmental controls in
    2008. The environmental laws to which we are subject have become
    more stringent over time, however, and we could incur material
    costs or expenses in the future to comply with environmental
    laws.
 
    Certain of our operations generate hazardous substances and
    wastes. If a release of such substances or wastes occurs at or
    from our properties, or at or from any offsite disposal location
    to which substances or wastes from our current or former
    operations were taken, or if contamination is discovered at any
    of our current or former properties, we may be held liable for
    the costs of cleanup and for any other response by governmental
    authorities or private parties, together with any associated
    fines, penalties or damages. In most jurisdictions, this
    liability would arise whether or not we had complied with
    environmental laws governing the handling of hazardous
    substances or wastes.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be adversely affected by the impact of government
    regulations on our OEM customers. | 
 
    Although the products we manufacture and supply to commercial
    vehicle OEMs are not subject to significant government
    regulation, our business is indirectly impacted by the extensive
    governmental regulation applicable to commercial vehicle OEMs.
    These regulations primarily relate to emissions and noise
    standards imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency
    (EPA), state regulatory agencies, such as the
    California Air Resources Board (CARB), and other
    regulatory agencies around the world. Commercial vehicle OEMs
    are also subject to the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
    Safety Act and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
    promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety
    Administration. Changes in emission standards and other proposed
    governmental regulations could impact the demand for commercial
    vehicles and, as a result, indirectly impact our operations. For
    example, new emission standards governing Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) diesel engines that went into effect in the
    United States on October 1, 2002 and January 1, 2007
    resulted in significant purchases of new trucks by fleet
    operators
    
    20
 
    prior to such date and reduced short term demand for such trucks
    in periods immediately following such date. New emission
    standards for truck engines used in Class 5 to 8 trucks
    imposed by the EPA and CARB are scheduled to become effective in
    2010. To the extent that current or future governmental
    regulation has a negative impact on the demand for commercial
    vehicles, our business, financial condition or results of
    operations could be adversely affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our customer base is concentrated and the loss of business
    from a major customer or the discontinuation of particular
    commercial vehicle platforms could reduce our revenues. | 
 
    Sales to PACCAR, International, Caterpillar, Freightliner and
    Volvo/Mack accounted for approximately 14%, 11%, 11%, 11% and
    11%, respectively, of our revenue in 2007, and our ten largest
    customers accounted for approximately 71% of our revenue in
    2007. The loss of any of our largest customers or the loss of
    significant business from any of these customers could have a
    material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
    results of operations. Even though we may be selected as the
    supplier of a product by an OEM for a particular vehicle, our
    OEM customers issue blanket purchase orders which generally
    provide for the supply of that customers annual
    requirements for that vehicle, rather than for a specific number
    of our products. If the OEMs requirements are less than
    estimated, the number of products we sell to that OEM will be
    accordingly reduced. In addition, the OEM may terminate its
    purchase orders with us at any time.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse
    effect on our revenues and results of operations. | 
 
    We have operations in Europe, China, Australia and Mexico, which
    accounted for approximately 23% of our revenues in 2007. As a
    result, we generate a significant portion of our sales and incur
    a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other than
    the U.S. dollar. To the extent that we are unable to match
    revenues received in foreign currencies with costs paid in the
    same currency, exchange rate fluctuations in any such currency
    could have an adverse effect on our financial results.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We are subject to certain risks associated with our foreign
    operations. | 
 
    We have operations in Europe, China, Australia and Mexico, which
    accounted for approximately 23%, 13% and 16% of our total
    revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
    2005, respectively. There are certain risks inherent in our
    international business activities including, but not limited to:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting
    receivables through certain foreign legal systems; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | foreign customers, who may have longer payment cycles than
    customers in the United States; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | tax rates in certain foreign countries, which may exceed those
    in the United States and foreign earnings may be subject to
    withholding requirements or the imposition of tariffs, exchange
    controls or other restrictions, including restrictions on
    repatriation; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | intellectual property protection difficulties; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | general economic and political conditions in countries where we
    operate, which may have an adverse effect on our operations in
    those countries; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the difficulties associated with managing a large organization
    spread throughout various countries; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | complications in complying with a variety of foreign laws and
    regulations, which may conflict with United States law. | 
 
    As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will
    be dependent, in part, on our ability to anticipate and
    effectively manage these and other risks associated with foreign
    operations. We cannot assure you that these and other factors
    will not have a material adverse effect on our international
    operations or our business, financial condition or results of
    operations as a whole.
    
    21
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our inability to compete effectively in the highly
    competitive commercial vehicle component supply industry could
    result in lower prices for our products, reduced gross margins
    and loss of market share, which could have an adverse effect on
    our revenues and operating results. | 
 
    The commercial vehicle component supply industry is highly
    competitive. Our products primarily compete on the basis of
    price, breadth of product offerings, product quality, technical
    expertise and development capability, product delivery and
    product service. Increased competition may lead to price
    reductions resulting in reduced gross margins and loss of market
    share.
 
    Current and future competitors may make strategic acquisitions
    or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
    others, foresee the course of market development more accurately
    than we do, develop products that are superior to our products,
    produce similar products at lower cost than we can or adapt more
    quickly to new technologies, industry or customer requirements.
    By doing so, they may enhance their ability to meet the needs of
    our customers or potential future customers. These developments
    could limit our ability to obtain revenues from new customers
    and to maintain existing revenues from our customer base. We may
    not be able to compete successfully against current and future
    competitors and the failure to do so may have a material adverse
    effect on our business, operating results and financial
    condition.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our products may be rendered less attractive by changes in
    competitive technologies. | 
 
    Changes in competitive technologies may render certain of our
    products less attractive. Our ability to anticipate changes in
    technology and to successfully develop and introduce new and
    enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor
    in our ability to remain competitive. There can be no assurance
    that we will be able to achieve the technological advances that
    may be necessary for us to remain competitive. We are also
    subject to the risks generally associated with new product
    introductions and applications, including lack of market
    acceptance, delays in product development and failure to operate
    properly.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | If we are unable to recruit or retain skilled personnel, or
    if we lose the services of any of our key management personnel,
    our business, operating results and financial condition could be
    materially adversely affected. | 
 
    Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract,
    train, integrate and retain highly skilled personnel.
    Competition for these employees is intense. We may not be able
    to retain our current key employees or attract, train, integrate
    or retain other highly skilled personnel in the future. Our
    future success also depends in large part on the continued
    service of key management personnel, particularly our key
    executive officers. If we lose the services of one or more of
    these individuals or other key personnel, or if we are unable to
    attract, train, integrate and retain the highly skilled
    personnel we need, our business, operating results and financial
    condition could be materially adversely affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We have only limited protection for our proprietary rights in
    our intellectual property, which makes it difficult to prevent
    third parties from infringing upon our rights. | 
 
    Our success depends to a certain degree on our ability to
    protect our intellectual property and to operate without
    infringing on the proprietary rights of third parties. While we
    have been issued patents and have registered trademarks with
    respect to many of our products, our competitors could
    independently develop similar or superior products or
    technologies, duplicate our designs, trademarks, processes or
    other intellectual property or design around any processes or
    designs on which we have or may obtain patents or trademark
    protection. In addition, it is possible that third parties may
    have or acquire licenses for other technology or designs that we
    may use or desire to use, so that we may need to acquire
    licenses to, or to contest the validity of, such patents or
    trademarks of third parties. Such licenses may not be made
    available to us on acceptable terms, if at all, and we may not
    prevail in contesting the validity of third party rights.
 
    In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also protect
    trade secrets, know-how and other confidential information
    against unauthorized use by others or disclosure by persons who
    have access to them, such as our employees, through contractual
    arrangements. These arrangements may not provide meaningful
    protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary
    information in the event of any unauthorized use,
    misappropriation or
    
    22
 
    disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary
    information. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature
    of our technologies, our revenues could be materially adversely
    affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our products may be susceptible to claims by third parties
    that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights. | 
 
    As the number of products in our target markets increases and
    the functionality of these products further overlaps, we may
    become increasingly subject to claims by a third party that our
    technology infringes such partys proprietary rights.
    Regardless of their merit, any such claims could be time
    consuming and expensive to defend, may divert managements
    attention and resources, could cause product shipment delays and
    could require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing
    agreements. If successful, a claim of infringement against us
    and our inability to license the infringed or similar technology
    and/or
    product could have a material adverse effect on our business,
    operating results and financial condition.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | The market price of our common stock may be extremely
    volatile. | 
 
    Our stock price has fluctuated since our initial public offering
    in August 2004. The trading price of our common stock is subject
    to significant fluctuations in response to variations in
    quarterly operating results, including foreign currency exchange
    fluctuations, the gain or loss of significant orders, changes in
    earnings estimates by analysts, announcements of technological
    innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general
    conditions in the commercial vehicle industry and other events
    or factors. In addition, the equity markets in general have
    experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations which have
    affected the market price for many companies in industries
    similar or related to that of ours and which have been unrelated
    to the operating performance of these companies. These market
    fluctuations may have affected and may continue to affect the
    market price of our common stock.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our operating results, revenues and expenses may fluctuate
    significantly from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year, which
    could have an adverse effect on the market price of our
    stock. | 
 
    For a number of reasons, including but not limited to, those
    described below, our operating results, revenues and expenses
    have in the past varied and may in the future vary significantly
    from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year. These fluctuations
    could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common
    stock.
 
    Fluctuations in Quarterly or Annual Operating
    Results.  Our operating results may fluctuate as a
    result of:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | the size, timing, volume and execution of significant orders and
    shipments; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in the terms of our sales contracts; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the timing of new product announcements; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | market acceptance of new and enhanced products; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | the length of our sales cycles; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in our operating expenses; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | personnel changes; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | new business acquisitions; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | changes in foreign currency exchange rates; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | seasonal factors. | 
 
    Limited Ability to Adjust Expenses.  We base
    our operating expense budgets primarily on expected revenue
    trends. Certain of our expenses are relatively fixed and as such
    we may be unable to adjust expenses quickly enough to offset any
    unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any shortfall in
    revenue may cause significant variation in operating results in
    any quarter or year.
    
    23
 
    Based on the above factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter
    or year-to-year comparisons of our operating results may not be
    a good indication of our future performance. It is possible that
    in one or more future quarters or years, our operating results
    may be below the expectations of public market analysts and
    investors. In that event, the trading price of our common stock
    may be adversely affected.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | We may be subject to product liability claims, recalls or
    warranty claims, which could be expensive, damage our reputation
    and result in a diversion of management resources. | 
 
    As a supplier of products and systems to commercial vehicle
    OEMs, we face an inherent business risk of exposure to product
    liability claims in the event that our products, or the
    equipment into which our products are incorporated, malfunction
    and result in personal injury or death. Product liability claims
    could result in significant losses as a result of expenses
    incurred in defending claims or the award of damages.
 
    In addition, we may be required to participate in recalls
    involving systems or components sold by us if any prove to be
    defective, or we may voluntarily initiate a recall or make
    payments related to such claims as a result of various industry
    or business practices or the need to maintain good customer
    relationships. Such a recall would result in a diversion of
    management resources. While we do maintain product liability
    insurance, we cannot assure you that it will be sufficient to
    cover all product liability claims, that such claims will not
    exceed our insurance coverage limits or that such insurance will
    continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at
    all. Any product liability claim brought against us could have a
    material adverse effect on our results of operations.
 
    Moreover, we warrant the workmanship and materials of many of
    our products under limited warranties and have entered into
    warranty agreements with certain OEMs that warranty certain of
    our products in the hands of these OEMs customers, in some
    cases for as long as six years. Accordingly, we are subject to
    risk of warranty claims in the event that our products do not
    conform to our customers specifications or, in some cases
    in the event that our products do not conform with their
    customers expectations. It is possible for warranty claims
    to result in costly product recalls, significant repair costs
    and damage to our reputation, all of which would adversely
    affect our results of operations.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Equipment failures, delays in deliveries or catastrophic loss
    at any of our facilities could lead to production or service
    curtailments or shutdowns. | 
 
    We manufacture or assemble our products at facilities in North
    America, Europe, China and Australia. An interruption in
    production or service capabilities at any of these facilities as
    a result of equipment failure or other reasons could result in
    our inability to produce our products, which could reduce our
    net revenues and earnings for the affected period. In the event
    of a stoppage in production at any of our facilities, even if
    only temporary, or if we experience delays as a result of events
    that are beyond our control, delivery times to our customers
    could be severely affected. Any significant delay in deliveries
    to our customers could lead to increased returns or
    cancellations and cause us to lose future revenues. Our
    facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due
    to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent
    weather conditions. We may experience plant shutdowns or periods
    of reduced production as a result of equipment failure, delays
    in deliveries or catastrophic loss, which could have a material
    adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
    financial condition.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
    condition and make it more difficult to implement our business
    strategy. | 
 
    The aggregate amount of our outstanding indebtedness was
    $159.7 million as of December 31, 2007. Our
    substantial level of indebtedness increases the possibility that
    we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay, when due,
    the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of
    our indebtedness, including the notes. Our substantial
    indebtedness, combined with our lease and other financial
    obligations and contractual commitments could have other
    important consequences to you as a shareholder. For example, it
    could:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
    respect to our indebtedness, including the notes, and any
    failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt
    instruments, including financial and other restrictive
    covenants, could result in an event of default under the
    indenture governing the notes and the agreements governing such
    other indebtedness; | 
    
    24
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic,
    industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in
    government regulation; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
    from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
    reducing the availability of our cash flows to fund working
    capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
    corporate purposes; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
    in our business and the industry in which we operate; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
    competitors that have less debt; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working
    capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service
    requirements, execution of our business strategy or other
    purposes. | 
 
    Any of the above listed factors could materially adversely
    affect our business, financial condition and results of
    operations.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | The terms of our senior credit facility and the indenture
    governing the 8.0% senior notes due 2013 may restrict
    our current and future operations, particularly our ability to
    respond to changes in our business or to take certain
    actions. | 
 
    Our senior credit facility and the indenture governing the
    8.0% senior notes due 2013 contain covenants that, among
    other things, restricts our ability to:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | incur liens; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | incur or assume additional debt or guarantees or issue preferred
    stock; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | pay dividends, or make redemptions and repurchases, with respect
    to capital stock; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | prepay, or make redemptions and repurchases of, subordinated
    debt; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | make loans and investments; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | make capital expenditures; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | engage in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, sale/leaseback
    transactions and transactions with affiliates; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | change the business conducted by us or our subsidiaries; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | amend the terms of subordinated debt. | 
 
    Also, our senior credit facility requires us to maintain
    compliance with specified financial ratios and satisfy certain
    financial condition tests (some of which become more restrictive
    over time). If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
    such ratios, our lenders could declare an event of default under
    the senior credit facility, and our indebtedness could be
    declared immediately due and payable. Our ability to comply with
    the provisions of the senior credit facility may be affected by
    changes in economic or business conditions beyond our control.
    In addition, these covenants could affect our ability to operate
    our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of
    potential business opportunities as they arise.
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our inability to successfully execute any planned cost
    reductions, restructuring initiatives or the achievement of
    operational efficiencies could result in the incurrence of
    additional costs and expenses that could adversely affect our
    reported earnings. | 
 
    As part of our business strategy, we continuously seek ways to
    lower costs, improve manufacturing efficiencies and increase
    productivity and intend to apply this strategy to those
    operations acquired through acquisitions. We may be unsuccessful
    in achieving these objectives which could adversely affect our
    operating results and financial condition. In addition, we may
    incur restructuring charges in the future and such charges could
    adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
    
    25
 
    |  |  | 
    |  | Our earnings may be adversely affected by changes to the
    carrying values of our tangible and intangible assets, including
    goodwill, as a result of recording any impairment charges deemed
    necessary in conjunction with the execution of our periodic
    asset impairment assessment and testing policy. | 
 
    At December 31, 2007, we had goodwill of approximately
    $151.2 million and other intangible assets of approximately
    $97.6 million. We may identify additional anticipated or
    unanticipated impairments in any of our tangible or intangible
    asset categories in future testing periods and be required to
    record charges against earnings in the period in which the
    impairment is identified. Specific indicators that give rise to
    asset impairment may include, but are not limited to, changes in
    the general economic environment, changes or downturns in our
    industry as a whole, termination of any of our customer
    contracts, restructuring efforts and general workforce
    reductions among other factors.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 1B. | Unresolved
    Staff Comments | 
 
    None.
 
 
    Our corporate office is located in New Albany, Ohio. Several of
    our manufacturing facilities are located near our OEM customers
    to reduce our distribution costs, reduce risk of interruptions
    in our delivery schedule, further improve customer service and
    provide our customers with reliable delivery of products and
    services. The following table provides selected information
    regarding our principal facilities:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Approximate 
 |  |  | 
| 
    Location
 |  | 
    Primary Product/Function
 |  | 
    Square Footage
 |  | 
    Ownership Interest
 | 
|  | 
| 
    Douglas, Arizona
 |  | Warehouse Facility |  | 20,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Monona, Iowa
 |  | Wire Harness Assembly |  | 62,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Edgewood, Iowa
 |  | Wire Harness Assembly |  | 36,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Dekalb, Illinois
 |  | Cab Assembly |  | 60,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Michigan City, Indiana
 |  | Wipers, Switches |  | 87,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Wixom, Michigan
 |  | Engineering |  | 7,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Kings Mountain, North Carolina
 |  | Cab, Sleeper Box, Assembly |  | 180,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Statesville, North Carolina (2 facilities)
 |  | Interior Trim, Seats |  | 163,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Concord, North Carolina (2 facilities)
 |  | Injection Molding |  | 150,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Norwalk, Ohio (3 facilities)
 |  | Cab, Sleeper Box, Assembly |  | 360,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned/Leased | 
| 
    Shadyside, Ohio
 |  | Stamping of Steel and Aluminum Structural and Exposed Stamped
    Components |  | 200,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Chillicothe, Ohio
 |  | Interior Trim |  | 62,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Bellaire, Ohio
 |  | Warehouse Facility |  | 41,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Dublin, Ohio
 |  | Administration |  | 14,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    New Albany, Ohio (2 facilities)
 |  | Corporate Headquarters / R&D |  | 55,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Canby, Oregon
 |  | Electronics Assembly |  | 4,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Tigard, Oregon
 |  | Interior Trim |  | 121,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Lake Oswego, Oregon
 |  | RIM Process |  | 24,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Vonore, Tennessee (2 facilities)
 |  | Seats, Mirrors |  | 245,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned/Leased | 
| 
    Tellico Plains, Tennessee (2 facilities)
 |  | Cut and Sew, Warehouse Facility |  | 148,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
    
    26
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | Approximate 
 |  |  | 
| 
    Location
 |  | 
    Primary Product/Function
 |  | 
    Square Footage
 |  | 
    Ownership Interest
 | 
|  | 
| 
    Pikeville, Tennessee
 |  | Cut and Sew |  | 15,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Dublin, Virginia
 |  | Interior Trim, Seats |  | 79,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Seattle, Washington
 |  | RIM Process, Interior Trim, Seats |  | 156,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Vancouver, Washington (2 facilities)
 |  | Interior Trim |  | 63,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Tacoma, Washington
 |  | Injection Molding |  | 25,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Agua Prieta, Mexico (2 facilities)
 |  | Wire Harness Assembly |  | 205,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Northampton, United Kingdom
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 210,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Seneffs (Brussels), Belgium
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 35,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Brisbane, Australia
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 50,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Shanghai, China (2 facilities)
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 76,500 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Brandys nad Orlici, Czech Republic
 |  | Seat Assembly |  | 52,000 sq. ft. |  | Owned | 
| 
    Liberec, Czech Republic (2 facilities)
 |  | Wire Harness Assembly |  | 155,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
| 
    Kamyanets-Podilsky, Ukraine
 |  | Wire Harness Assembly |  | 46,000 sq. ft. |  | Leased | 
 
    We also have leased sales and service offices located in the
    United States, Australia, France and Czech Republic.
 
    Utilization of our facilities varies with North American,
    European and Asian commercial vehicle production and general
    economic conditions in such regions. All locations are
    principally used for manufacturing or assembly, except for our
    Wixom, Michigan and New Albany and Dublin, Ohio facilities which
    are administrative offices and our leased warehouse facilities
    in Douglas, Arizona, Tellico Plains, Tennessee and Bellaire,
    Ohio. During the fourth quarter of 2007 and first quarter of
    2008, our corporate headquarters, administrative and R&D
    facilities in Plain City, Gahanna, Dublin and New Albany, Ohio
    were consolidated into a single 50,000 square foot leased
    world headquarters and an attached 39,000 square foot
    Research and Development Center in New Albany, Ohio.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 3. | Legal
    Proceedings | 
 
    We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising
    in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited
    to, customer and supplier disputes and product liability claims
    arising out of the conduct of our businesses and examinations by
    the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS
    routinely examines our federal income tax returns and, in the
    course of those examinations, the IRS may propose adjustments to
    our federal income tax liability reported on such returns. It is
    our practice to defend those proposed adjustments that we deem
    lacking merit. We are not involved in any litigation at this
    time in which we expect that an unfavorable outcome of the
    proceedings, including any proposed adjustments presented to
    date by the IRS, individually or collectively, will have a
    material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
    operations or cash flows.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 4. | Submission
    of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 
 
    There were no matters submitted to a vote of stockholders during
    the fourth quarter of 2007.
    27
 
 
    PART II
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 5. | Market
    for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
    and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 
 
    Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
    under the symbol CVGI. The following table sets
    forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock, for the
    periods indicated as regularly reported by the Nasdaq Global
    Select Market:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | High |  |  | Low |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Year Ended December 31, 2007:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fourth Quarter
 |  | $ | 16.38 |  |  | $ | 12.11 |  | 
| 
    Third Quarter
 |  | $ | 19.29 |  |  | $ | 12.71 |  | 
| 
    Second Quarter
 |  | $ | 21.03 |  |  | $ | 17.70 |  | 
| 
    First Quarter
 |  | $ | 22.24 |  |  | $ | 18.82 |  | 
| 
    Year Ended December 31, 2006:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fourth Quarter
 |  | $ | 23.57 |  |  | $ | 18.47 |  | 
| 
    Third Quarter
 |  | $ | 21.08 |  |  | $ | 17.19 |  | 
| 
    Second Quarter
 |  | $ | 21.25 |  |  | $ | 17.82 |  | 
| 
    First Quarter
 |  | $ | 22.29 |  |  | $ | 17.10 |  | 
 
    As of February 29, 2008, there were 100 holders of record
    of our outstanding common stock.
 
    We have not declared or paid any dividends to the holders of our
    common stock in the past and do not anticipate paying dividends
    in the foreseeable future. Any future payment of dividends is
    within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend
    upon, among other factors, the capital requirements, operating
    results and financial condition of CVG. In addition, our ability
    to pay cash dividends is limited under the terms of the credit
    agreement governing our senior credit facility.
    
    28
 
    The graph below matches Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.s
    cumulative
    40-month
    total stockholder return on common stock with the cumulative
    total returns of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the Commercial
    Vehicle Supplier Composite Index. The Commercial Vehicle
    Supplier Composite Index (NEW) includes five companies: Accuride
    Corporation, ArvinMeritor, Inc., Cummins, Inc., Eaton Corp. and
    Stoneridge, Inc. The Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite (NEW)
    includes Stoneridge, Inc., and excludes Modine Manufacturing
    Co., because we believe Stoneridge, Inc. is more comparable to
    us. We no longer present the Commercial Vehicle Supplier
    Composite (OLD) because we believe the Commercial Vehicle
    Supplier Composite (NEW) includes companies that are more
    comparable to us. The graph tracks the performance of a $100
    investment in our common stock and in each index (with the
    reinvestment of all dividends) from August 5, 2004 to
    December 31, 2007.
 
    COMPARISON
    OF 40-MONTH
    CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
    Among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index,
    the Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite Index (OLD)
    and the Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite Index (NEW)
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | * | $100 invested on 8/5/04 in stock or index-including reinvestment
    of dividends. | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 08/05/04 |  |  | 12/31/04 |  |  | 12/31/05 |  |  | 12/31/06 |  |  | 12/31/07 | 
| 
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 166.64 |  |  |  | $ | 143.36 |  |  |  | $ | 166.41 |  |  |  | $ | 110.69 |  | 
| 
    NASDAQ Composite
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 118.09 |  |  |  | $ | 120.94 |  |  |  | $ | 134.73 |  |  |  | $ | 147.21 |  | 
| 
    Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite (OLD)
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 116.42 |  |  |  | $ | 111.37 |  |  |  | $ | 130.28 |  |  |  | $ | 195.74 |  | 
| 
    Commercial Vehicle Supplier Composite (NEW)
 |  |  | $ | 100.00 |  |  |  | $ | 116.59 |  |  |  | $ | 109.70 |  |  |  | $ | 131.37 |  |  |  | $ | 201.30 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The information in the graph and table above is not
    soliciting material, is not deemed filed
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
    incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the
    Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date
    of this annual report, except to the extent that we specifically
    incorporate such information by reference.
    
    29
 
    The following table sets forth information in connection with
    purchases made by, or on behalf of, us or any affiliated
    purchaser, of shares of our common stock during the quarterly
    period ended December 31, 2007:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (c) Total 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | (d) Maximum 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Shares (or 
 |  |  | Number (or 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Units) 
 |  |  | Approximate 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Purchased as 
 |  |  | Dollar Value) of 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Part of 
 |  |  | Shares (or Units) 
 |  | 
|  |  | (a) Total 
 |  |  | (b) Average 
 |  |  | Publicly 
 |  |  | that May Yet Be 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of 
 |  |  | Price Paid 
 |  |  | Announced 
 |  |  | Purchased Under 
 |  | 
|  |  | Shares (or Units) 
 |  |  | per Share (or 
 |  |  | Plans or 
 |  |  | the Plans or 
 |  | 
|  |  | Purchased |  |  | Unit) |  |  | Programs |  |  | Prgrams |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Month #1
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| (October 1, 2007 through October 31, 2007)
 |  |  | 22,317 |  |  | $ | 13.40 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Month #2
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| (November 1, 2007 through November 30, 2007)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Month #3
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| (December 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    We did not repurchase any of our common stock on the open market
    as part of a stock repurchase program during the fourth quarter
    of 2007, however, our employees surrendered 22,317 shares
    of our common stock to satisfy the tax withholding obligations
    on the vesting of restricted stock awards issued under our
    Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan.
    
    30
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 6. | Selected
    Financial Data | 
 
    The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
    data regarding our business and certain industry information and
    should be read in conjunction with Managements
    Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
    Operations, and our consolidated financial statements and
    notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
 
    Material
    Events Affecting Financial Statement Comparability:
    
 
    Collectively, our acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona, Cabarrus
    and C.I.E.B. materially impacted our results of operations and
    as a result, our consolidated financial statements for the years
    ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are not comparable
    to the results of the prior periods presented without
    consideration of the information provided in Note 3 and
    Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements contained
    in Item 8 of our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006, and Note 3 and
    Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements contained
    in Item 15 of our Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2003 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Statement of Operations Data:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Revenues
 |  | $ | 696,786 |  |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  |  | $ | 380,445 |  |  | $ | 287,579 |  | 
| 
    Cost of revenues
 |  |  | 620,145 |  |  |  | 768,913 |  |  |  | 620,031 |  |  |  | 309,696 |  |  |  | 237,884 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross profit
 |  |  | 76,641 |  |  |  | 149,838 |  |  |  | 134,450 |  |  |  | 70,749 |  |  |  | 49,695 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 55,493 |  |  |  | 51,950 |  |  |  | 44,564 |  |  |  | 28,985 |  |  |  | 24,281 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense(1)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,125 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization expense
 |  |  | 894 |  |  |  | 414 |  |  |  | 358 |  |  |  | 107 |  |  |  | 185 |  | 
| 
    Restructuring charges
 |  |  | 1,433 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating income
 |  |  | 18,821 |  |  |  | 97,474 |  |  |  | 89,528 |  |  |  | 31,532 |  |  |  | 25,229 |  | 
| 
    Loss (gain) on foreign currency forward contracts and other
 |  |  | 9,361 |  |  |  | (3,468 | ) |  |  | (3,741 | ) |  |  | (1,247 | ) |  |  | 3,230 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense
 |  |  | 14,147 |  |  |  | 14,829 |  |  |  | 13,195 |  |  |  | 7,244 |  |  |  | 9,796 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 |  |  | 149 |  |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | 1,605 |  |  |  | 2,972 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Loss) income before income taxes
 |  |  | (4,836 | ) |  |  | 85,795 |  |  |  | 78,549 |  |  |  | 23,930 |  |  |  | 9,231 |  | 
| 
    (Benefit) provision for income taxes
 |  |  | (1,585 | ) |  |  | 27,745 |  |  |  | 29,138 |  |  |  | 6,481 |  |  |  | 5,267 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net (loss) income
 |  | $ | (3,251 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  |  | $ | 3,964 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Loss) earnings per share:(2)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
 |  | $ | (0.15 | ) |  | $ | 2.74 |  |  | $ | 2.54 |  |  | $ | 1.13 |  |  | $ | 0.29 |  | 
| 
    Diluted
 |  | $ | (0.15 | ) |  | $ | 2.69 |  |  | $ | 2.51 |  |  | $ | 1.12 |  |  | $ | 0.29 |  | 
| 
    Weighted average common shares outstanding:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
 |  |  | 21,439 |  |  |  | 21,151 |  |  |  | 19,440 |  |  |  | 15,429 |  |  |  | 13,779 |  | 
| 
    Diluted
 |  |  | 21,439 |  |  |  | 21,545 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  |  |  | 15,623 |  |  |  | 13,883 |  | 
| 
    Balance Sheet Data (at end of each period):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
 |  | $ | 117,172 |  |  | $ | 135,368 |  |  | $ | 119,104 |  |  | $ | 41,727 |  |  | $ | 28,216 |  | 
| 
    Total assets
 |  | $ | 599,089 |  |  | $ | 590,822 |  |  | $ | 543,883 |  |  | $ | 225,638 |  |  | $ | 210,495 |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities, excluding debt
 |  | $ | 174,029 |  |  | $ | 163,803 |  |  | $ | 150,797 |  |  | $ | 60,667 |  |  | $ | 48,215 |  | 
| 
    Total debt
 |  | $ | 159,725 |  |  | $ | 162,114 |  |  | $ | 191,009 |  |  | $ | 53,925 |  |  | $ | 127,474 |  | 
| 
    Total stockholders investment
 |  | $ | 265,335 |  |  | $ | 264,905 |  |  | $ | 202,077 |  |  | $ | 111,046 |  |  | $ | 34,806 |  | 
    
    31
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2003 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Other Data:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjusted EBITDA(3)
 |  | $ | 27,296 |  |  | $ | 115,910 |  |  | $ | 105,385 |  |  | $ | 40,389 |  |  | $ | 30,105 |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating activities
 |  | $ | 47,575 |  |  | $ | 36,922 |  |  | $ | 44,156 |  |  | $ | 34,177 |  |  | $ | 10,442 |  | 
| 
    Investing activities
 |  | $ | (53,292 | ) |  | $ | (27,625 | ) |  | $ | (188,569 | ) |  | $ | (8,907 | ) |  | $ | (5,967 | ) | 
| 
    Financing activities
 |  | $ | (2,394 | ) |  | $ | (27,952 | ) |  | $ | 188,547 |  |  | $ | (28,427 | ) |  | $ | (2,761 | ) | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  | $ | 16,425 |  |  | $ | 14,983 |  |  | $ | 12,064 |  |  | $ | 7,567 |  |  | $ | 8,106 |  | 
| 
    Capital expenditures, net
 |  | $ | 17,274 |  |  | $ | 22,389 |  |  | $ | 20,669 |  |  | $ | 8,907 |  |  | $ | 5,967 |  | 
| 
    North American Heavy-duty (Class 8) truck production
    (units)(4)
 |  |  | 212,000 |  |  |  | 378,000 |  |  |  | 341,000 |  |  |  | 269,000 |  |  |  | 182,000 |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (1) |  | Share-based compensation expense in 2004 is related to options
    issued in conjunction with our IPO that vested immediately.
    Subsequent share-based compensation is recorded in selling,
    general and administrative expenses. | 
|  | 
    | (2) |  | Earnings (loss) per share has been calculated giving effect to
    the reclassification of our outstanding classes of common stock
    into one class of common stock and, in connection therewith, a
    38.991-to-one stock split. | 
|  | 
    | (3) |  | Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is
    reconciled to net income, its most directly comparable GAAP
    measure, in the accompanying financial tables. Adjusted EBITDA
    is defined as net earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
    amortization, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt,
    restructuring charges, miscellaneous income/expenses and
    cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle. In
    calculating Adjusted EBITDA, we exclude the effects of
    gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, restructuring
    charges, miscellaneous income/expenses and cumulative effect of
    changes in accounting principles because our management believes
    that some of these items may not occur in certain periods, the
    amounts recognized can vary significantly from period to period
    and these items do not facilitate an understanding of our
    operating performance. Our management utilizes Adjusted EBITDA,
    in addition to the supplemental information, as an operating
    performance measure in conjunction with GAAP measures, such as
    net income and gross margin calculated in conformity with GAAP. | 
 
    Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the
    supplemental information, as an integral part of its reporting
    and planning processes and as one of the primary measures to,
    among other things:
 
    (i) monitor and evaluate the performance of our business
    operations;
 
    (ii) facilitate managements internal comparisons of
    our historical operating performance of our business operations;
 
    (iii) facilitate managements external comparisons of
    the results of our overall business to the historical operating
    performance of other companies that may have different capital
    structures and debt levels;
 
    (iv) review and assess the operating performance of our
    management team and as a measure in evaluating employee
    compensation and bonuses;
 
    (v) analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning
    decisions regarding future operating investments; and
 
    (vi) plan for and prepare future annual operating budgets
    and determine appropriate levels of operating investments.
 
    Our management believes that Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the
    supplemental information, is useful to investors as it provides
    them with disclosures of our operating results on the same basis
    as that used by our management. Additionally, our management
    believes that Adjusted EBITDA, in addition to the supplemental
    information, provides useful information to investors about the
    performance of our overall business because the
    32
 
    measure eliminates the effects of certain recurring and other
    unusual or infrequent charges that are not directly attributable
    to our underlying operating performance. Additionally, our
    management believes that because we have historically provided a
    non-GAAP financial measure in previous filings, that continuing
    to include a non-GAAP measure in our filings provides
    consistency in our financial reporting and continuity to
    investors for comparability purposes. Accordingly, we believe
    that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when used in
    conjunction with the supplemental information and GAAP financial
    measures, is a useful financial analysis tool, used by our
    management as described above, that can assist investors in
    assessing our financial condition, operating performance and
    underlying strength. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in
    isolation or as a substitute for net income prepared in
    conformity with GAAP. Other companies may define Adjusted EBITDA
    differently. Adjusted EBITDA, as well as the other information
    in this filing, should be read in conjunction with our financial
    statements and footnotes contained in the documents that we file
    with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
    The following is a reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted
    EBITDA:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2004 |  |  | 2003 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net (loss) income
 |  | $ | (3,251 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  |  | $ | 17,449 |  |  | $ | 3,964 |  | 
| 
    Add (subtract):
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 16,425 |  |  |  | 14,983 |  |  |  | 12,064 |  |  |  | 7,567 |  |  |  | 8,106 |  | 
| 
    Interest expense
 |  |  | 14,147 |  |  |  | 14,829 |  |  |  | 13,195 |  |  |  | 7,244 |  |  |  | 9,796 |  | 
| 
    (Benefit) provision for income taxes
 |  |  | (1,585 | ) |  |  | 27,745 |  |  |  | 29,138 |  |  |  | 6,481 |  |  |  | 5,267 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 |  |  | 149 |  |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  | 1,605 |  |  |  | 2,972 |  | 
| 
    Restructuring charges
 |  |  | 1,433 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Miscellaneous (income) expense
 |  |  | (22 | ) |  |  | (15 | ) |  |  | 52 |  |  |  | 43 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjusted EBITDA
 |  | $ | 27,296 |  |  | $ | 115,910 |  |  | $ | 105,385 |  |  | $ | 40,389 |  |  | $ | 30,105 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Supplemental Information:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncash loss (gain) on forward exchange contracts
 |  | $ | 9,967 |  |  | $ | (4,203 | ) |  | $ | (3,793 | ) |  | $ | (1,290 | ) |  | $ | 3,230 |  | 
| 
    Nonrecurring (benefit) provision for prior period debt service
 |  | $ | (584 | ) |  | $ | 750 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (4) |  | Source: Americas Commercial Transportation Research Co. LLC and
    ACT Publications. | 
    
    33
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 7. | Managements
    Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
    Operations | 
 
    You should read the following discussion and analysis in
    conjunction with the information set forth under
    Item 6  Selected Financial Data and
    our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
    included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
    The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook,
    our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and
    capital resources and other non-historical statements in this
    discussion are forward-looking statements. See
    Forward-Looking Information on page ii of this
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
    These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks
    and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and
    uncertainties described under Item 1A  Risk
    Factors. Our actual results may differ materially from
    those contained in or implied by any forward-looking
    statements.
 
    Company
    Overview
 
    We are a leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions
    for the global commercial vehicle market, including the
    Heavy-duty (Class 8) truck market, the construction,
    military, bus and agriculture market and the specialty
    transportation markets. As a result of our strong leadership in
    cab-related products and systems, we are positioned to benefit
    from the increased focus of our customers on cab design and
    comfort and convenience features to better serve their end-user,
    the driver. Our products include suspension seat systems,
    interior trim systems (including instrument panels, door panels,
    headliners, cabinetry and floor systems), cab structures and
    components, mirrors, wiper systems, electronic wire harness
    assemblies and controls and switches specifically designed for
    applications in commercial vehicles.
 
    We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
    by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
    a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
    believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
    our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
    American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
    systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
    interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
    other structural components. We believe our products are used by
    virtually every major North American heavy truck commercial
    vehicle OEM, which we believe creates an opportunity to
    cross-sell our products and offer a fully integrated system
    solution.
 
    Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
    new heavy truck commercial vehicles manufactured in North
    America, which in turn is a function of general economic
    conditions, interest rates, changes in governmental regulations,
    consumer spending, fuel costs and our customers inventory
    levels and production rates. New heavy truck commercial vehicle
    demand has historically been cyclical and is particularly
    sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy, which
    generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage hauled by
    commercial vehicles. Production of heavy truck commercial
    vehicles in North America initially peaked in 1999 and
    experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak
    economy, an oversupply of new and used vehicle inventory and
    lower spending on heavy truck commercial vehicles and equipment.
    Demand for commercial vehicles improved in 2006 due to broad
    economic recovery in North America, corresponding growth in the
    movement of goods, the growing need to replace aging truck
    fleets and OEMs received larger than expected pre-orders in
    anticipation of the new EPA emissions standards becoming
    effective in 2007. During 2007, the demand for North American
    Class 8 heavy trucks experienced a downturn as a result of
    pre-orders in 2006 and general weakness in the North American
    economy and corresponding decline in the need for commercial
    vehicles to haul freight tonnage in North America.
 
    In 2007, approximately 41% of our revenue was generated from
    sales to North American heavy-duty truck OEMs. Our remaining
    revenue in 2007 was primarily derived from sales to OEMs in the
    global construction market, the aftermarket, OEM service
    organizations and other commercial vehicle and specialty
    markets. Demand for our products is also driven to a significant
    degree by preferences of the end-user of the commercial vehicle,
    particularly with respect to Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) trucks. Unlike the automotive industry,
    commercial vehicle OEMs generally afford the ultimate end-user
    the ability to specify many of the component parts that will be
    used to manufacture the commercial vehicle, including a wide
    variety of cab interior styles and colors, the brand and type of
    seats, type of seat fabric and color and specific mirror
    styling. In addition, certain of our products are only utilized
    in Heavy-duty (Class 8) trucks, such as our storage
    systems, sleeper boxes, sleeper bunks and privacy curtains, and,
    as a result, changes in demand for Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) trucks or the mix of options on a vehicle
    can have a greater impact on
    
    34
 
    our business than changes in the overall demand for commercial
    vehicles. To the extent that demand increases for higher content
    vehicles, our revenues and gross profit will be positively
    impacted.
 
    Demand for our products is also dependent on the overall vehicle
    demand for new commercial vehicles in the global construction
    equipment market and generally follows certain economic
    conditions around the world. Within the construction market,
    there are two classes of construction equipment, the
    medium/heavy equipment market (weighing over 12 metric tons) and
    the light construction equipment market (weighing below 12
    metric tons). Demand in the medium/heavy construction equipment
    market is typically related to the level of larger scale
    infrastructure development projects such as highways, dams,
    harbors, hospitals, airports and industrial development as well
    as activity in the mining, forestry and other raw material based
    industries. Demand in the light construction equipment market is
    typically related to certain economic conditions such as the
    level of housing construction and other smaller-scale
    developments and projects. Our products are primarily used in
    the medium/heavy construction equipment markets.
 
    Along with North America, we have operations in Europe, China,
    Australia and Mexico. Our operating results are, therefore,
    impacted by exchange rate fluctuations to the extent we are
    unable to match revenues received in such currencies with costs
    incurred in such currencies. Strengthening of these foreign
    currencies as compared to the U.S. dollar resulted in an
    approximate $11.0 million increase in our revenues in 2007
    as compared to 2006 and an approximate $3.0 million
    increase in 2006 as compared to 2005. Because our costs were
    generally impacted to the same degree as our revenue, this
    exchange rate fluctuation did not have a material impact on our
    net income in 2007 as compared to 2006 and 2006 compared to 2005.
 
    We continuously seek ways to improve our operating performance
    by lowering costs. These efforts include, but are not limited
    to, the following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | sourcing efforts in Europe and Asia; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | consolidating our supply base to improve purchasing leverage; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | eliminating excess production capacity through the closure and
    consolidation of manufacturing or assembly facilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | implementing Lean Manufacturing and Total Quality Production
    System (TQPS) initiatives to improve operating
    efficiency and product quality. | 
 
    Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
    new vehicle production, we also have the opportunity to grow
    through increasing our product content per vehicle through cross
    selling and bundling of products. We generally compete for new
    business at the beginning of the development of a new vehicle
    platform and upon the redesign of existing programs. New
    platform development generally begins at least one to three
    years before the marketing of such models by our customers.
    Contract durations for commercial vehicle products generally
    extend for the entire life of the platform, which is typically
    five to seven years.
 
    In sourcing products for a specific platform, the customer
    generally develops a proposed production timetable, including
    current volume and option mix estimates based on their own
    assumptions, and then sources business with the supplier
    pursuant to written contracts, purchase orders or other firm
    commitments in terms of price, quality, technology and delivery.
    In general, these contracts, purchase orders and commitments
    provide that the customer can terminate if a supplier does not
    meet specified quality and delivery requirements and, in many
    cases, they provide that the price will decrease over the
    proposed production timetable. Awarded business generally covers
    the supply of all or a portion of a customers production
    and service requirements for a particular product program rather
    than the supply of a specific quantity of products. Accordingly,
    in estimating awarded business over the life of a contract or
    other commitment, a supplier must make various assumptions as to
    the estimated number of vehicles expected to be produced, the
    timing of that production, mix of options on the vehicles
    produced and pricing of the products being supplied. The actual
    production volumes and option mix of vehicles produced by
    customers depend on a number of factors that are beyond a
    suppliers control.
    
    35
 
    Recent
    Acquisitions
 
    In October 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock
    of PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o. (PEKM), an electronic
    wire harness manufacturer primarily for the commercial truck
    market, with facilities in the Czech Republic and the Ukraine.
    The PEKM acquisition was financed with borrowings under our
    revolving credit facility. The operating results of PEKM have
    been included in our 2007 consolidated financial statements
    since the date of acquisition.
 
    In October 2007, we acquired the heavy-gauge thermoforming and
    injection molding assets of the Fabrication Division of Gage
    Industries, Inc. (Gage), with facilities in Tigard
    and Lake Oswego, Oregon. The Gage acquisition was financed with
    borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The operating
    results of Gage have been included in our 2007 consolidated
    financial statements since the date of acquisition.
 
    In December 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of
    Short Bark Industries, LLC (SBI), a supplier of seat
    covers and various
    cut-and-sew
    trim products, with facilities in Tellico Plains and Pikeville,
    Tennessee The SBI acquisition was financed with borrowings under
    our revolving credit facility. The operating results of SBI have
    been included in our 2007 consolidated financial statements
    since the date of acquisition.
 
    See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements
    contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for detailed information on these transactions.
 
    Critical
    Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
    Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity
    with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
    States of America (U.S. GAAP). For a
    comprehensive discussion of our accounting policies, see
    Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in
    Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
 
    The preparation of our consolidated financial statements
    requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
    reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
    contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
    statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
    during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions,
    particularly relating to revenue recognition and sales
    commitments, provision for income taxes, restructuring and
    impairment charges and litigation and contingencies may have a
    material impact on our financial statements, and are discussed
    in detail throughout our analysis of our results of operations.
 
    In addition to evaluating estimates relating to the items
    discussed above, we also consider other estimates, including,
    but not limited to, those related to allowance for doubtful
    accounts, defined benefit pension plan assumptions, uncertain
    tax positions and goodwill and other intangible assets. We base
    our estimates on historical experience and various other
    assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
    circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
    judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities and
    equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
    results and outcomes could differ materially from these
    estimates and assumptions. See Item 1A  Risk
    Factors for additional information regarding risk factors
    that may impact our estimates.
 
    We apply the following critical accounting polices in the
    preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
 
    Revenue Recognition and Sales Commitments  We
    recognize revenue in accordance with the SECs Staff
    Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue
    Recognition in Financial Statements, and
    SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and other
    authoritative accounting literature. These pronouncements
    generally require that we recognize revenue when
    (1) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
    (2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
    (3) there is a fixed or determinable price and
    (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Our products are
    generally shipped from our facilities to our customers, which is
    when legal title passes to the customer for substantially all of
    our revenues. We enter into agreements with our customers at the
    beginning of a given platforms life to supply products for
    that platform. Once we enter into such agreements, fulfillment
    of our purchasing requirements is our obligation for the entire
    production life of the platform, with terms generally ranging
    from five to seven years, and we have no provisions to terminate
    such contracts.
 
    Provisions for anticipated contract losses are recognized at the
    time they become evident. In certain instances, we may be
    committed under existing agreements to supply product to our
    customers at selling prices that are not
    
    36
 
    sufficient to cover the cost to produce such product. In such
    situations, we record a provision for the estimated future
    amount of such losses. Such losses are recognized at the time
    that the loss is probable and reasonably estimable and are
    recorded at the minimum amount necessary to fulfill our
    obligations to our customers. We had a provision for anticipated
    contract losses of $0.4 million as of December 31,
    2007. We had no such provision as of December 31, 2006 and
    $0.1 million at December 31, 2005.
 
    Goodwill and Intangible Assets  Goodwill
    represents the excess of acquisition purchase price over the
    fair value of net assets acquired. We review goodwill and
    indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually in
    the second fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in
    circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable
    in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
    (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible
    Assets. We review indefinite and definite-lived intangible
    assets in accordance with the provisions of
    SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144, Accounting
    for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The
    provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step
    impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we
    compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying
    value. Our reporting unit is consistent with the reportable
    segment identified in Note 10 to our consolidated financial
    statements contained in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2007. If the fair value of
    the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
    assigned to that unit, goodwill is considered not impaired and
    we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying
    value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds
    the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the
    second step of the impairment test in order to determine the
    implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill. If the
    carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds its
    implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss
    equal to the difference. SFAS No. 142 also requires
    that the fair value of the purchased intangible assets with
    indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the carrying
    value. We estimate the fair value of these intangible assets
    using an income approach. We recognize an impairment loss when
    the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than
    the carrying value. In this regard, our management considers the
    following indicators in determining if events or changes in
    circumstances have occurred indicating that the recoverability
    of the carrying amount of indefinite-lived and amortizing
    intangible assets should be assessed: (1) a significant
    decrease in the market value of an asset; (2) a significant
    change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or a
    significant physical change in an asset; (3) a significant
    adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
    could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or
    assessment by a regulator; (4) an accumulation of costs
    significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to
    acquire or construct an asset; and (5) a current period
    operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating
    or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
    demonstrates continuing losses associated with an asset used for
    the purpose of producing revenue. Our annual goodwill analysis
    was performed during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and did
    not result in an impairment charge.
 
    Annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances change,
    a determination is made by management, in accordance with
    SFAS No. 144 to ascertain whether property and
    equipment and certain definite-lived intangibles have been
    impaired based on the sum of expected future undiscounted cash
    flows from operating activities. If the estimated net cash flows
    are less than the carrying amount of such assets, we will
    recognize an impairment loss in an amount necessary to write
    down the assets to fair value as determined from expected future
    discounted cash flows. In accordance with SFAS 142, we test
    intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for
    impairment annually or when conditions indicate impairment may
    have occurred.
 
    Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in
    nature and involves the use of significant estimates and
    assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue
    growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected
    future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic
    and market conditions and determination of appropriate market
    comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
    believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and
    inherently uncertain. The valuation approaches we use include
    the Income Approach (the Discounted Cash Flow Method) and the
    Market Approach (the Guideline Company and Transaction Methods)
    to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit; earnings are
    emphasized in the Discounted Cash Flow, Guideline Company, and
    the Transaction Methods. In addition, these methods utilize
    market data in the derivation of a value estimate and are
    forward-looking in nature. The Discounted Cash Flow Method
    utilizes a market-derived rate of return to discount anticipated
    performance, while the Guideline Company Method and the
    
    37
 
    Transaction Method incorporate multiples that are based on the
    markets assessment of future performance. Actual future
    results may differ materially from those estimates.
 
    Intangible
    Assets  Indefinite-Lived
 
    Basis for
    Accounting Treatment
 
    Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of customer
    relationships acquired in the 2005 acquisitions of Mayflower and
    Monona. We have accounted for these customer relationships as
    indefinite-lived intangible assets, which we believe is
    appropriate based upon the following circumstances and
    conditions under which we operate:
 
    Sourcing,
    Barriers to Entry and Competitor Risks
 
    The customer sourcing decision for the Mayflower and Monona
    businesses is heavily predicated on price, quality, delivery and
    the overall customer relationship. Absent a significant change
    in any or all of these factors, it is unlikely that a customer
    would source production to an alternate supplier. In addition,
    the factors listed below impose a high barrier for new
    competitors to enter into this industry. Historical experience
    indicates that Mayflower and Monona have not lost any primary
    customers
    and/or
    relationships due to these factors and such loss is not
    anticipated in the foreseeable future for the following reasons:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Costs associated with setting up a new production line,
    including tooling costs, are typically cost prohibitive in a
    competitive pricing environment; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The risk associated with potential production delays and a
    disruption to the supply chain typically outweighs any potential
    economic benefit; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Significant initial outlays of capital and institutional
    production knowledge represent a significant barrier to entry.
    Due to the asset-intensive nature of the businesses, a new
    competitor would require a substantial amount of initial capital; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Changeover costs are high both from an economic and risk
    standpoint; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The highly complex nature of successfully producing electronic
    wiring harnesses and complete cab structures in accordance with
    OEM quality standards makes it difficult for a competitor to
    enter the business; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | There is significant risk in operating the businesses as a
    result of the highly customized nature of the business. For
    example, production runs in the commercial vehicle business are
    significantly smaller and are more build to order in
    nature which requires the systems, expertise, equipment and
    logistics in order to be successful. | 
 
    These costs and risks are the primary prohibiting factors which
    preclude our customers from sourcing their business elsewhere at
    any given time.
 
    Duration
    and Strength of Existing Customer Relationships/Concentrations
    of Revenue
 
    Mayflower and Monona have long-standing relationships with their
    existing customers and have experienced de minimis historical
    attrition. These relationships have endured over time and,
    accordingly, an assumption of prospective attrition is
    inconsistent with this historical experience and
    managements expectations. Both Mayflower and Monona have a
    limited customer base, consisting of three primary customers,
    that has existed for many years, and we had pre-existing
    long-standing relationships with the same primary customers
    prior to the acquisitions of Mayflower and Monona, which in most
    cases have exceeded a period of 40 years. We believe the
    addition of Mayflower and Monona further strengthens our
    existing customer relationships with such customers.
    Specifically:
 
    Mayflower and Mononas relationships with their
    customers key decision-making personnel are mature and
    stable.
    
    38
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflowers and Mononas customers typically make
    purchasing decisions through a team approach versus a single
    decision maker. Mayflower and Monona have historically
    maintained strong relationships with individuals at all levels
    of the decision making process including the engineering,
    operations and purchasing functions in order to successfully
    minimize the impact of any employee turnover at the customer
    level. | 
 
    The top three customers of Mayflower and Monona have been
    established customers for a substantial period of time.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower has had relationships with Volvo/Mack, Freightliner
    and International since 1965, 1997 and 2001, respectively. We
    and/or our
    predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with these
    same customers since 1949, 1954 and 1950, respectively. These
    customers comprised approximately 89%, 88% and 85% of
    Mayflowers revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Monona has had relationships with Deere & Co.,
    Caterpillar and Oshkosh since 1969, 1970 and 1985, respectively.
    We and/or
    our predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with
    these same customers since 1987, 1958 and 1950, respectively.
    These customers comprised approximately 84%, 85% and 88% of
    Mononas revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
 
    Valuation
    Methodology
 
    For valuation purposes, the income approach using the discounted
    cash flow method was employed for the purpose of evaluating the
    Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets.
    Under this approach, we determined that the fair value of the
    Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets at
    their dates of acquisition was $45.9 million and
    $28.9 million, respectively.
 
    Significant assumptions used in the valuation and determination
    of an indefinite useful life for these customer relationship
    intangible assets included the following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | The revenue projections that we relied upon to substantiate the
    economic consideration paid for the businesses is almost
    exclusively tied to the existing customer base. With regard to
    the valuation process, we projected less than 1% of total
    revenue in 2005 and 2006 to be lost due to core customer
    attrition and no core customer attrition thereafter. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Contributory asset charges were deducted for assets that
    contribute to income generation including: (i) net working
    capital; (ii) personal property; (iii) real property;
    (iv) tradename and trademarks; and (v) an assembled
    workforce. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The cash flows associated with the customer relationships
    acquired in the Mayflower and Monona transactions were
    discounted at a rate of return of 25.0% and 29.5%, respectively,
    which is approximately equal to the equity rate of return. | 
 
    Intangible
    Asset Impairment  Accounting Treatment
 
    If Mayflower
    and/or
    Monona were to prospectively lose any of their customers, in
    accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 16 and 17 of
    SFAS No. 142, we would perform an intangible asset
    impairment test to determine the impact of the loss on the
    customer relationship intangible asset and if impairment was
    indicated, we would record an impairment loss in our
    consolidated statement of operations.
 
    Accounting for Income Taxes  As part of the
    process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we
    are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the
    jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, tax expense
    includes the impact of differing treatment of items for tax and
    accounting purposes which result in deferred tax assets and
    liabilities which are included in our consolidated balance
    sheet. To the extent that recovery of deferred tax assets is not
    likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Significant
    judgment is required in determining our provision for income
    taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation
    allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. As of
    December 31, 2007, we determined that a valuation allowance
    of $1.3 million was needed against our deferred tax assets.
    This valuation allowance is related to the inability to use
    certain foreign tax credits and state operating losses that are
    being carried forward prior to their expiration. In the event
    that our actual results differ from our estimates or we adjust
    these estimates in future periods, the effects of these
    adjustments could
    
    39
 
    materially impact our financial position and results of
    operations. The net deferred tax liability as of
    December 31, 2007 was $14.1 million. We adopted
    Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
    Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
    Income Taxes  an Interpretation of FASB Statement
    No. 109, (FIN 48) in the first quarter
    2007. The adoption of this interpretation changed the manner in
    which we evaluate recognition and measurement of uncertain tax
    positions. See Recently Issued Accounting
    Pronouncements in Note 2 to our consolidated
    financial statements for further information regarding the
    adoption of this authoritative literature.
 
    Warranties  We are subjected to warranty
    claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
    design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
    require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
    products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
    products. Depending on the terms under which we supplied
    products to our customers, a customer may hold us responsible
    for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective
    products, when the product supplied did not perform as
    represented. Our policy is to reserve for estimated future
    customer warranty costs based on historical trends and current
    economic factors. The amount of such estimates for warranty
    provisions was approximately $4.0 million,
    $5.2 million and $7.1 million at December 31,
    2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
    Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
    Plans  We sponsor pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans that cover certain hourly and
    salaried employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Our
    policy is to make annual contributions to the plans to fund the
    normal cost as required by local regulations. In addition, we
    have an other post-retirement benefit plan for certain
    U.S. operations, retirees and their dependents.
 
    Our
    Assumptions 
 
    The determination of pension and other post-retirement benefit
    plan obligations and related expenses requires the use of
    assumptions to estimate the amount of the benefits that
    employees earn while working, as well as the present value of
    those benefits. Our assumptions are determined based on current
    market conditions, historical information and consultation with
    and input from our actuaries. Due to the significant management
    judgment involved, our assumptions could have a material impact
    on the measurement of our pension and other post-retirement
    benefit expenses and obligations.
 
    Significant assumptions used to measure our annual pension and
    other post-retirement benefit expenses include:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | discount rate; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | expected return on plan assets; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | health care cost trend rates. | 
 
    Discount Rate  The discount rate represents
    the interest rate that should be used to determine the present
    value of future cash flows currently expected to be required to
    settle the pension and other post-retirement benefit
    obligations. In estimating this rate, we consider rates of
    return on high quality fixed-income investments included in
    various published bond indexes. We consider the Moodys Aa
    Corporate Bond Index and the Barclays Capital AA Rated
    Sterling Bond Index in the determination of the appropriate
    discount rate assumptions. The weighted average rate we used to
    measure our pension obligation as of December 31, 2007 was
    6.0% for the U.S. and 5.9% for the non-U.S. pension plans.
 
    Expected Long-Term Rate of Return  The
    expected return on pension plan assets is based on our
    historical experience, our pension plan investment strategy and
    our expectations for long-term rates of return. Our pension plan
    investment strategy is reviewed annually and is established
    based upon plan liabilities, an evaluation of market conditions,
    tolerance for risk and cash requirements for benefit payments.
    We use a third-party advisor to assist us in determining our
    investment allocation and modeling our long-term rate of return
    assumptions. For 2007 and 2006, we assumed an expected long-term
    rate of return on plan assets of 7.5% and 8.5%, respectively,
    for the U.S. pension plans and 6.0% and 6.0%, respectively,
    for the
    non-U.S. pension
    plans.
    
    40
 
    Changes in the discount rate and expected long-term rate of
    return on plan assets within the range indicated below would
    have had the following impact on 2007 pension and other
    post-retirement benefits results (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  | 
|  |  | Point Increase |  |  | Point Decrease |  | 
|  | 
| 
    (Decrease) increase due to change in assumptions used to
    determine net periodic benefit costs for the year ended
    December 31, 2007:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Discount rate
 |  | $ | (289 | ) |  | $ | 510 |  | 
| 
    Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
 |  | $ | (572 | ) |  | $ | 572 |  | 
| 
    (Decrease) increase due to change in assumptions used to
    determine benefit obligations for the year ended
    December 31, 2007:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Discount rate
 |  | $ | (11,849 | ) |  | $ | 15,291 |  | 
 
    Health Care Cost Trend Rates  The health care
    cost trend rates represent the annual rates of change in the
    cost of health care benefits based on estimates of health care
    inflation, changes in health care utilization or delivery
    patterns, technological advances and changes in the health
    status of the plan participants. For measurement purposes, a
    10.0% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered
    health care benefits was assumed for 2007 and 2006. The rate was
    assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5% through 2013 and remain
    constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost trend rates can
    have a significant effect on the amounts reported for other
    post-retirement benefit plans.
 
    Differences in the ultimate health care cost trend rates within
    the range indicated below would have had the following impact on
    2007 other post-retirement benefit results (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  |  | 1 Percentage Point 
 |  | 
|  |  | Point Increase |  |  | Decrease |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Increase (Decrease) from change in health care cost trend rates
    Other post-retirement benefit expense
 |  | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | (38 | ) | 
| 
    Other post-retirement benefit liability
 |  | $ | 105 |  |  | $ | (98 | ) | 
 
    Recently
    Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
    See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in
    Item 8 in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for a full description of recently issued
    and/or
    adopted accounting pronouncements.
    
    41
 
    Results
    of Operations
 
    The table below sets forth certain operating data expressed as a
    percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Revenues
 |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 100.0 | % |  |  | 100.0 | % | 
| 
    Cost of revenues
 |  |  | 89.0 |  |  |  | 83.7 |  |  |  | 82.2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross profit
 |  |  | 11.0 |  |  |  | 16.3 |  |  |  | 17.8 |  | 
| 
    Selling, general and administrative expenses
 |  |  | 8.0 |  |  |  | 5.7 |  |  |  | 5.9 |  | 
| 
    Amortization expense
 |  |  | 0.1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Restructuring charges
 |  |  | 0.2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating income
 |  |  | 2.7 |  |  |  | 10.6 |  |  |  | 11.9 |  | 
| 
    Other expense (income)
 |  |  | 1.3 |  |  |  | (0.4 | ) |  |  | (0.5 | ) | 
| 
    Interest expense
 |  |  | 2.0 |  |  |  | 1.6 |  |  |  | 1.7 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Loss) income before income taxes
 |  |  | (0.6 | ) |  |  | 9.4 |  |  |  | 10.5 |  | 
| 
    (Benefit) provision for income taxes
 |  |  | (0.2 | ) |  |  | 3.0 |  |  |  | 3.9 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net (loss) income
 |  |  | (0.4 | )% |  |  | 6.4 | % |  |  | 6.6 | % | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Year
    Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended
    December 31, 2006
 
    Revenues.  Revenues decreased
    $222.0 million, or 24.2%, to $696.8 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2007 from $918.8 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2006. This decrease resulted
    primarily from:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | a 43.9% decrease in North American Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) truck production, fluctuations in production
    levels for other North American end markets and net new business
    awards resulted in approximately $270.4 million of
    decreased revenues; | 
 
    The decrease was partially offset by:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | increased acquisition related revenue of approximately
    $29.0 million from the full year impact of the acquisition
    of C.I.E.B. and the partial year impact of PEKM and Gage; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | an increase in production levels, fluctuations in content and
    net new business awards for our European, Australian and Asian
    markets of approximately $8.4 million; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | favorable foreign exchange fluctuations and adjustments of
    approximately $11.0 million. | 
 
    Gross Profit.  Gross profit decreased
    $73.2 million, or 48.9%, to $76.6 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2007 from $149.8 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2006. As a percentage of revenues,
    gross profit decreased to 11.0% for the year ended
    December 31, 2007 from 16.3% for the year ended
    December 31, 2006. This decrease resulted primarily from
    the our inability to reduce fixed costs proportionate to the
    decrease in revenues from the prior period. We continued to seek
    material cost reductions, labor efficiencies and general
    operating cost reductions to generate additional profits during
    the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
    Selling, General and Administrative
    Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative
    expenses increased $3.5 million, or 6.8%, to
    $55.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
    from $52.0 million for the year ended December 31,
    2006. The increase resulted primarily from higher wages and
    benefits, travel expenses, currency fluctuations as well as
    increased stock compensation expense, partially offset by
    reduced incentive compensation expense as compared to the prior
    year.
 
    Amortization Expense.  Amortization expense
    increased to approximately $0.9 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2007 from approximately $0.4 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was
    primarily the result of breakout of definite-lived intangible
    assets for the C.I.E.B. and PEKM acquisitions.
    
    42
 
    Restructuring Charges.  In 2007, we approved
    the closure of our Seattle, Washington facility. In connection
    with the closure we incurred restructuring charges of
    approximately $1.4 million during the year ended
    December 31, 2007.
 
    Other Expense (Income).  We use forward
    exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction
    exposures of our United Kingdom operations. We estimate our
    projected revenues in certain foreign currencies or locations
    and will hedge a portion of the anticipated long or short
    position. We have not designated any of our forward exchange
    contracts as cash flow hedges, electing instead to
    mark-to-market the contracts and record the fair value of the
    contracts on our consolidated balance sheets, with the
    offsetting noncash gain or loss recorded in our consolidated
    statement of operations. The $9.4 million expense for the
    year ended December 31, 2007 and the $3.5 million gain
    for the year ended December 31, 2006 are primarily related
    to the noncash change in value of the forward exchange contracts
    in existence at the end of each period.
 
    Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased
    $0.7 million to $14.1 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2007 from $14.8 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily the
    result of lower average outstanding debt balances.
 
    Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt.  In June
    2007, we repaid our foreign denominated term loan in full. In
    connection with this loan repayment, we wrote off a
    proportionate amount of our debt financing costs of
    approximately $0.1 million. In connection with our
    June 30, 2006 repayment of approximately $25.0 million
    of our U.S. Dollar denominated term loan, we wrote off a
    proportionate amount of our debt financing costs of
    approximately $0.3 million.
 
    (Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes.  Our
    effective tax rate during the year ended December 31, 2007
    was 32.8% compared to 32.3% for 2006. Provision for income taxes
    decreased $29.3 million to a benefit of $1.6 million
    for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to an income
    tax provision of $27.7 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006. The increase in effective rate year over
    year can be primarily attributed to the decrease in income
    before taxes and release of certain tax reserves.
 
    Net (Loss) Income.  Net income decreased
    $61.4 million to a loss of $3.3 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2007, compared to net income of
    $58.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
    primarily as a result of the factors discussed above.
 
    Year
    Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
    December 31, 2005
 
    Revenues.  Revenues increased
    $164.3 million, or 21.8%, to $918.8 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2006 from $754.5 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase resulted
    primarily from:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | increased acquisition related revenue of approximately
    $77.0 million from the full year impact of the acquisitions
    of Mayflower, Monona, Cabarrus and the partial year impact of
    C.I.E.B.; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | a 10.9% increase in North American Heavy-duty
    (Class 8) truck production, fluctuations in production
    levels for other North American end markets and net new business
    awards resulted in approximately $88.0 million of increased
    revenues; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | an increase in production levels, fluctuations in content and
    net new business awards for our European, Australian and Asian
    markets of approximately $2.5 million; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations and adjustments of
    approximately $3 million. | 
 
    Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased
    $15.3 million, or 11.4%, to $149.8 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2006 from $134.5 million for
    the year ended December 31, 2005. As a percentage of
    revenues, gross profit decreased to 16.3% for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 from 17.8% for the year ended
    December 31, 2005. This decrease resulted primarily from
    the result of various raw material cost increases as well as
    certain operational and other one-time events during the year.
    We continued to seek material cost reductions, labor
    efficiencies and general operating cost reductions to generate
    additional profits during the year ended December 31, 2006.
    
    43
 
    Selling, General and Administrative
    Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative
    expenses increased $7.4 million, or 16.6%, to
    $52.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
    from $44.6 million for the year ended December 31,
    2005. This increase resulted primarily from the full year impact
    of the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus during
    2005 as well as increases in wages and the cost of adopting
    FAS 123(R) during the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
    Amortization Expense.  Amortization expense
    increased to approximately $414 thousand for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 from approximately $358 thousand for the
    year ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily
    the result of the full year impact of the Mayflower and Monona
    acquisitions.
 
    Other (Income).  We use forward exchange
    contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures of our
    United Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues in
    certain foreign currencies or locations and will hedge a portion
    of the anticipated long or short position. We have not
    designated any of our forward exchange contracts as cash flow
    hedges, electing instead to mark-to-market the contracts and
    record the fair value of the contracts on our consolidated
    balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or loss
    recorded in our consolidated statement of operations. The
    $3.5 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2006
    and the $3.7 million gain for the year ended
    December 31, 2005 are primarily related to the noncash
    change in value of the forward exchange contracts in existence
    at the end of each period.
 
    Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased
    $1.6 million to $14.8 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 from $13.2 million for the year
    ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily the
    result of higher average interest rates during the year.
 
    Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt.  In 2006,
    we repaid approximately $25.0 million of our
    U.S. dollar denominated term loan. In connection with this
    loan repayment, approximately $0.3 million of deferred fees
    were written off. In 2005, as part of our 2005 issuance of
    8.0% senior notes due 2013, we amended our existing senior
    credit agreement and wrote off approximately $1.5 million
    of deferred fees.
 
    Provision for Income Taxes.  Our effective tax
    rate during the year ended December 31, 2006 was 32.3%
    compared to 37.1% for 2005. Provision for income taxes decreased
    $1.4 million to $27.7 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006, compared to an income tax provision of
    $29.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
    The decrease in effective rate year over year can be primarily
    attributed to the tax planning initiatives taken during 2006
    which favorably impacted tax credits and provision rates.
 
    Net Income.  Net income increased
    $8.7 million to $58.1 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2006, compared to $49.4 million for the
    year ended December 31, 2005, primarily as a result of the
    factors discussed above.
 
    Liquidity
    and Capital Resources
 
    Cash
    Flows
 
    For the year ended December 31, 2007, cash provided by
    operations was approximately $47.6 million, compared to
    $36.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006.
    This increase was primarily the result of the change in accounts
    receivable during the year. Cash provided by operations in the
    year ended December 31, 2005 was $44.2 million.
 
    Net cash used in investing activities was approximately
    $53.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
    compared to $27.6 million in the year ended
    December 31, 2006 and $188.6 million in the year ended
    December 31, 2005. The amounts used in the year ended
    December 31, 2007 primarily reflect capital expenditure
    purchases related to upgrades, replacements or new equipment,
    machinery and tooling as well as the acquisitions of PEKM, Gage
    and SBI. The amounts used in the year December 31, 2006
    primarily reflect capital expenditure purchases and the
    acquisition of C.I.E.B.. The amounts used in the year ended
    December 31, 2005 primarily reflect capital expenditure
    purchases and the acquisitions of Mayflower, Monona and Cabarrus.
 
    Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately
    $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
    compared to $28.0 million in the year ended
    December 31, 2006 and net cash provided by of
    $188.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2005.
    The net cash used in financing activities in the year ended
    December 31, 2007 was
    
    44
 
    primarily related to the repayment of our foreign denominated
    term loan. The net cash used in financing activities for
    December 31, 2006, was primarily related to our repayment
    of our U.S. dollar denominated term loan and the net cash
    provided by financial activities for December 31, 2005 was
    primarily related to the issuance of our 8.0% senior notes.
 
    Debt
    and Credit Facilities
 
    As of December 31, 2007, we had an aggregate of
    $159.7 million of outstanding indebtedness excluding
    $1.8 million of outstanding letters of credit under various
    financing arrangements and an additional $81.8 million of
    borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility. We were
    in compliance with all of our respective financial covenants
    under our debt and senior credit facility as of
    December 31, 2007. The indebtedness consisted of the
    following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | $9.5 million under our revolving credit facility and
    $0.2 million of capital lease obligations. The weighted
    average rate on these borrowings, for the year ended
    December 31, 2007, was approximately 8.5% with respect to
    the revolving borrowings and; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | $150 million of 8.0% senior notes due 2013. | 
 
    On June 30, 2006, we repaid approximately
    $25.0 million of our U.S. dollar denominated term
    loan. The repayment of the term loan reduced the principal
    amount of the term loan from approximately $40 million to
    $15 million. In connection with this loan repayment,
    approximately $0.3 million of deferred fees, representing a
    proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
    loss on early extinguishment of debt.
 
    On June 29, 2007, we repaid our foreign denominated term
    loan in full. In connection with this loan repayment,
    approximately $0.1 million of deferred fees, representing a
    proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
    loss on early extinguishment of debt.
 
    On August 16, 2007, we entered into an Amendment and Waiver
    Letter to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
    Amendment and Waiver Letter). Pursuant to the terms
    of the Amendment and Waiver Letter, the lenders consented to
    increase the size of permitted acquisitions to $40 million
    per fiscal year and waived any default or event of default in
    connection with intercompany loans, contributions to capital,
    investments in capital stock or mixed stock and indebtedness
    certificates provided in connection with permitted acquisitions.
 
    On September 28, 2007, we entered into the Tenth Amendment
    to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the Tenth
    Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the Tenth Amendment,
    the lenders consented to various amendments, including but not
    limited to, changes to reporting requirements and financial
    ratios, which included the fixed charge coverage ratio and the
    maximum ratio of total indebtedness. Based on the provisions of
    AICPAs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
    No. 98-14,
    Debtors Accounting for the Changes in Line-of-Credit or
    Revolving-Debt Arrangements, approximately $0.1 million
    third party fees relating to the credit agreement were
    capitalized and are being amortized over the remaining life of
    the senior credit agreement.
 
    On March 11, 2008, we entered into the Eleventh Amendment
    to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
    Eleventh Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the
    Eleventh Amendment, the banks party thereto consented to various
    amendments to the senior credit agreement, including but not
    limited to: (i) amendments to the fixed charge ratio and
    the leverage ratio to provide the Company increased flexibility
    in the near future; (ii) an amendment to the applicable
    margin pricing grid to include increased rates for prime rate
    and LIBOR borrowings when the Companys leverage ratio is
    equal to or greater than 4.0x; (iii) a reduction in the
    size of the revolving credit facility from $100 million to
    $50 million, subject to increases to $75 million and
    then to $100 million upon satisfaction of certain
    conditions, including meeting certain financial covenant
    thresholds; (iv) increases in certain baskets in the
    indebtedness, asset disposition, investment and lien covenants
    contained in the senior credit agreement; and (v) an
    amendment to permit proposed future tax planning.
 
    The revolving credit facility is available until
    January 31, 2010. Based on the provisions of
    EITF 98-14
    and the provisions of EITF Issue
    No. 96-19,
    Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
    Debt Instruments, approximately $3.9 million third
    party fees relating to the senior credit agreement and
    8.0% senior notes due 2013 were capitalized at
    December 31, 2007 and are being amortized over the life of
    the senior credit facility.
    
    45
 
    Under the terms of our senior credit facility, as amended by the
    Eleventh Amendment, availability under the revolving credit
    facility is subject to the lesser of (i) a borrowing base
    that is equal to the sum of (a) 80% of eligible accounts
    receivable plus (b) 50% of eligible inventory; or
    (ii) $50.0 million; provided, that the
    $50.0 million cap is subject to increase to
    $75.0 million and then $100.0 million upon
    satisfaction of certain financial covenant tests. Borrowings
    under the senior credit agreement bear interest at a floating
    rate, which can be either the prime rate or LIBOR plus the
    applicable margin to the prime rate and LIBOR borrowings based
    on our leverage ratio. The senior credit agreement contains
    various financial covenants, including, a limitation on the
    amount of capital expenditures of not more than
    $40.0 million in any fiscal year, a minimum ratio of EBITDA
    to cash interest expense, a fixed charge coverage ratio and a
    maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA. The EBITDA to
    cash interest expense ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio and the
    maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA for the
    12 months then ended, as measured at the end of each fiscal
    quarter is set forth below:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Quarter(s) Ending
 |  | EBITDA to Cash Interest Expense Ratio |  | 
|  | 
| 
    12/31/2007
 |  |  | 2.50 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    03/31/2008
 |  |  | 2.00 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    06/30/2008 and 09/30/2008
 |  |  | 2.25 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    12/31/2008 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
 |  |  | 2.50 to 1.00 |  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Quarter(s) Ending
 |  | Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio |  | 
|  | 
| 
    12/31/2007
 |  |  | 1.10 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    03/31/2008
 |  |  | .80 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    06/30/2008
 |  |  | .85 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    09/30/2008, 12/31/2008 and 03/31/2009
 |  |  | .90 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    6/30/2009
 |  |  | 1.00 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    9/30/2009
 |  |  | 1.15 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    12/31/2009 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
 |  |  | 1.25 to 1.00 |  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Quarter(s) Ending
 |  | Maximum Ratio of Total Indebtedness |  | 
|  | 
| 
    12/31/2007
 |  |  | 4.75 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    03/31/2008
 |  |  | 6.10 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    06/30/2008
 |  |  | 5.65 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    09/30/2008
 |  |  | 5.15 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    12/31/2008
 |  |  | 4.75 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    03/31/2009
 |  |  | 4.50 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    06/30/2009
 |  |  | 4.00 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    09/30/2009
 |  |  | 3.50 to 1.00 |  | 
| 
    12/31/2009 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
 |  |  | 3.00 to 1.00 |  | 
 
    The senior credit agreement also contains covenants restricting
    certain corporate actions, including asset dispositions,
    acquisitions, dividends, change of control, incurring
    indebtedness, making loans and investments and transactions with
    affiliates. If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
    such ratios, our lenders could declare a default under the
    senior credit agreement, and our indebtedness thereunder could
    be declared immediately due and payable. The senior credit
    agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our assets
    and the assets of our subsidiaries party to the financing,
    except that the assets of our foreign subsidiaries party to this
    financing only secure foreign borrowings. The senior credit
    agreement also contains customary events of default.
 
    The 8.0% senior notes due 2013 are senior unsecured
    obligations and rank pari passu in right of payment to
    all of our existing and future senior indebtedness and are
    effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured
    obligations. The 8.0% senior notes due 2013 are guaranteed
    by all of our domestic subsidiaries.
 
    The indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes due 2013
    contain covenants that limit, among other things, additional
    indebtedness, issuance of preferred stock, dividends,
    repurchases of capital stock or subordinated
    
    46
 
    indebtedness, investments, liens, restrictions on the ability of
    our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, sales of assets,
    sale/leaseback transactions, mergers and transactions with
    affiliates. Upon a change of control, each holder shall have the
    right to require that we purchase such holders securities
    at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal
    amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
    repurchase. The indenture governing the 8.0% senior notes
    due 2013 also contains customary events of default.
 
    We believe that cash flow from operating activities together
    with available borrowings under our senior credit facility will
    be sufficient to fund currently anticipated working capital,
    planned capital spending and debt service requirements for at
    least the next twelve months. Capital expenditures for 2008 are
    expected to be approximately $20.0 million.
 
    Contractual
    Obligations and Commercial Commitments
 
    The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of
    December 31, 2007:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Payments Due by Period |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Less Than 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | More Than 
 |  | 
|  |  | Total |  |  | 1 Year |  |  | 1-3 Years |  |  | 3-5 Years |  |  | 5 Years |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Long-term debt obligations
 |  | $ | 159,725 |  |  | $ | 116 |  |  | $ | 9,608 |  |  | $ | 1 |  |  | $ | 150,000 |  | 
| 
    Estimated interest payments
 |  |  | 43,228 |  |  |  | 12,819 |  |  |  | 12,409 |  |  |  | 12,000 |  |  |  | 6,000 |  | 
| 
    Operating lease obligations
 |  |  | 60,210 |  |  |  | 10,227 |  |  |  | 15,332 |  |  |  | 11,462 |  |  |  | 23,189 |  | 
| 
    Pension and other post-retirement funding
 |  |  | 37,613 |  |  |  | 2,686 |  |  |  | 5,966 |  |  |  | 6,958 |  |  |  | 22,003 |  | 
| 
    FIN 48 obligations
 |  |  | 1,026 |  |  |  | 1,026 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
 |  | $ | 301,802 |  |  | $ | 26,874 |  |  | $ | 43,315 |  |  | $ | 30,421 |  |  | $ | 201,192 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The FIN 48 obligations shown in the table above represent
    uncertain tax positions related to temporary differences. The
    years for which the temporary differences related to the
    uncertain tax positions will reverse have been estimated in
    scheduling the obligations within the table. In addition to the
    Interpretation 48 obligations in the table above, approximately
    $1.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been
    recorded as liabilities in accordance with Interpretation 48,
    and we are uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be
    settled. Related to the unrecognized tax benefits not included
    in the table above, the Company has also recorded a liability
    for potential penalties of $29 thousand and interest of $228
    thousand.
 
    Since December 31, 2007, there have been no material
    changes outside the ordinary course of business to our
    contractual obligations as set forth above.
 
    In addition to the obligations noted above, we have obligations
    reported as other long-term liabilities that consist primarily
    of facility closure and consolidation costs, defined benefit
    plan and other post-retirement benefit plans and other items. We
    also enter into agreements with our customers at the beginning
    of a given platforms life to supply products for the
    entire life of that vehicle platform, which is typically five to
    seven years. These agreements generally provide for the supply
    of a customers production requirements for a particular
    platform, rather than for the purchase of a specific quantity of
    products. Accordingly, our obligations under these agreements
    are not reflected in the contractual obligations table above.
 
    As of December 31, 2007, we were not party to significant
    purchase obligations for goods or services.
 
    Off-Balance
    Sheet Arrangements
 
    We use standby letters of credit to guarantee our performance
    under various contracts and arrangements, principally in
    connection with our workers compensation liabilities and
    for leases on equipment and facilities. These letter of credit
    contracts are usually extended on a year-to-year basis. As of
    December 31, 2007, we had outstanding letters of credit of
    $1.8 million. We do not believe that these letters of
    credit will be required to be drawn.
 
    We currently have no non-consolidated special purpose entity
    arrangements.
    
    47
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 7A. | Quantitative
    and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 
 
    Interest
    Rate Risk
 
    We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in
    foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk
    is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market
    rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest
    rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial
    instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We do enter
    into financial instruments, from time to time, to manage and
    reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
    and interest rates and to hedge a portion of future anticipated
    currency transactions. The counterparties are primarily major
    financial institutions.
 
    We manage our interest rate risk by balancing the amount of our
    fixed rate and variable rate debt. For fixed rate debt, interest
    rate changes affect the fair market value of such debt but do
    not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely for variable rate
    debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair
    market value of such debt, but do impact future earnings and
    cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.
    Approximately $9.5 million and $11.8 million of our
    debt was variable rate debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
    respectively. Holding other variables constant (such as foreign
    exchange rates and debt levels), a one percentage point change
    in interest rates would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax
    earnings and cash flows for the next year of approximately
    $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The
    impact on the fair market value of our debt at December 31,
    2007 and 2006 would have been insignificant.
 
    Foreign
    Currency Risk
 
    Foreign currency risk is the risk that we will incur economic
    losses due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange
    rates. We use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign
    currency translation exposures of our United Kingdom operations.
    We estimate our projected revenues in certain foreign currencies
    or locations, and will hedge a portion or all of the anticipated
    long or short position. The contracts typically run from three
    months up to three years. These contracts are marked-to-market
    and the fair value is included in assets (liabilities) in our
    consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or
    loss included in other income or expense on our consolidated
    statements of operations. We do not hold or issue foreign
    exchange options or forward contracts for trading purposes.
 
    Outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts at
    December 31, 2007 are more fully described in the notes to
    our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
    Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
    The fair value of these contracts at December 31, 2007 and
    2006 amounted to a $1.5 million liability and an
    $8.5 million asset, respectively, which is reflected in
    other long-term liabilities and other assets in our consolidated
    balance sheets. None of these contracts have been designated as
    cash flow hedges; thus, the change in fair value at each
    reporting date is reflected as a noncash charge (income) in our
    consolidated statement of operations. In 2008, we have elected
    to designate our future forward exchange contracts as cash flow
    hedges.
 
    Our primary exposures to foreign currency exchange fluctuations
    are pound sterling, Eurodollar and Japanese yen. At
    December 31, 2007, the potential reduction in earnings from
    a hypothetical instantaneous 10% adverse change in quoted
    foreign currency spot rates applied to foreign currency
    sensitive instruments is limited by the assumption that all of
    the foreign currencies to which we are exposed would
    simultaneously decrease by 10% because such synchronized changes
    are unlikely to occur. The effects of the forward exchange
    contracts have been included in the above analysis; however, the
    sensitivity model does not include the inherent risks associated
    with the anticipated future transactions denominated in foreign
    currency.
 
    Foreign
    Currency Transactions
 
    A portion of our revenues during the year ended
    December 31, 2007 were derived from manufacturing
    operations outside of the United States. The results of
    operations and the financial position of our operations in these
    other countries are primarily measured in their respective
    currency and translated into U.S. dollars. A portion of the
    expenses generated in these countries is in currencies different
    from which revenue is generated. As discussed above, from time
    to time, we enter into forward exchange contracts to mitigate a
    portion of this currency risk. The
    
    48
 
    reported income of these operations will be higher or lower
    depending on a weakening or strengthening of the
    U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency.
 
    A portion of our assets at December 31, 2007 are based in
    our foreign operations and are translated into U.S. dollars
    at foreign currency exchange rates in effect as of the end of
    each period, with the effect of such translation reflected as a
    separate component of stockholders investment.
    Accordingly, our stockholders investment will fluctuate
    depending upon the weakening or strengthening of the
    U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency.
 
    Effects
    of Inflation
 
    Inflation potentially affects us in two principal ways. First, a
    portion of our debt is tied to prevailing short-term interest
    rates that may change as a result of inflation rates,
    translating into changes in interest expense. Second, general
    inflation can impact material purchases, labor and other costs.
    In many cases, we have limited ability to pass through
    inflation-related cost increases due to the competitive nature
    of the markets that we serve. In the past few years, however,
    inflation has not been a significant factor.
    
    49
 
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 8. | Financial
    Statements and Supplementary Data | 
 
    INDEX TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
    Documents
    Filed as Part of this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Page | 
|  | 
|  |  |  | 51 |  | 
|  |  |  | 52 |  | 
|  |  |  | 53 |  | 
|  |  |  | 54 |  | 
|  |  |  | 55 |  | 
|  |  |  | 56 |  | 
|  |  |  | 101 |  | 
    
    50
 
 
    REPORT OF
    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
    To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
 
    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
    Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and
    the related consolidated statements of operations,
    stockholders investment, and cash flows for each of the
    three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our
    audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in
    the Index to Item 15. These consolidated financial
    statements and financial statement schedules are the
    responsibility of the Companys management. Our
    responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated
    financial statements and financial statement schedules based on
    our audits.
 
    We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
    standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
    reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
    statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
    examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
    disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit
    also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
    significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
    the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
    our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
    In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
    fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
    December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of their
    operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
    the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with
    accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
    America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement
    schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
    financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
    material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
    As discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial
    statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company changed
    the manner in which it accounts for uncertain income tax
    positions.
 
    As discussed in Notes 2 and 14 to the consolidated
    financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed its method of
    accounting for defined benefit pension and other post-retirement
    benefit plans and as discussed in Note 13 to the
    consolidated financial statements, in 2006, the Company changed
    its method of accounting for share-based compensation.
 
    We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
    Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
    December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
    Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued
    by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
    Commission and our report dated March 13, 2008 expressed an
    unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
    financial reporting.
 
    /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    March 13, 2008
    
    51
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
    CONSOLIDATED
    BALANCE SHEETS
    December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except share and per share amounts) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    CURRENT ASSETS:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
 |  | $ | 9,867 |  |  | $ | 19,821 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of
    $3,758 and $5,536, respectively
 |  |  | 107,687 |  |  |  | 123,471 |  | 
| 
    Inventories, net
 |  |  | 96,385 |  |  |  | 88,723 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
 |  |  | 16,508 |  |  |  | 24,272 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
 |  |  | 12,989 |  |  |  | 8,819 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
 |  |  | 243,436 |  |  |  | 265,106 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Land and buildings
 |  |  | 32,793 |  |  |  | 30,203 |  | 
| 
    Machinery and equipment
 |  |  | 146,448 |  |  |  | 120,416 |  | 
| 
    Construction in progress
 |  |  | 16,636 |  |  |  | 17,414 |  | 
| 
    Less accumulated depreciation
 |  |  | (97,619 | ) |  |  | (77,645 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment, net
 |  |  | 98,258 |  |  |  | 90,388 |  | 
| 
    GOODWILL
 |  |  | 151,189 |  |  |  | 134,766 |  | 
| 
    INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization of $1,687 and
    $840, respectively
 |  |  | 97,575 |  |  |  | 84,188 |  | 
| 
    OTHER ASSETS, net
 |  |  | 8,631 |  |  |  | 16,374 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL ASSETS
 |  | $ | 599,089 |  |  | $ | 590,822 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 | 
| 
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current maturities of long-term debt
 |  | $ | 116 |  |  | $ | 2,158 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  | 93,033 |  |  |  | 86,610 |  | 
| 
    Accrued liabilities
 |  |  | 33,115 |  |  |  | 40,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
 |  |  | 126,264 |  |  |  | 129,738 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities
 |  |  | 159,609 |  |  |  | 159,956 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
 |  |  | 27,076 |  |  |  | 10,611 |  | 
| 
    PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
 |  |  | 18,335 |  |  |  | 22,188 |  | 
| 
    OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
 |  |  | 2,470 |  |  |  | 3,424 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities
 |  |  | 333,754 |  |  |  | 325,917 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Preferred stock $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
    authorized; no shares issued and outstanding; common stock
    $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized;
    21,536,814 and 21,368,831 shares issued and outstanding,
    respectively
 |  |  | 215 |  |  |  | 214 |  | 
| 
    Treasury stock purchased from employees; 28,153 shares and
    5,836 shares, respectively
 |  |  | (414 | ) |  |  | (115 | ) | 
| 
    Additional paid-in capital
 |  |  | 177,421 |  |  |  | 174,044 |  | 
| 
    Retained earnings
 |  |  | 88,818 |  |  |  | 92,007 |  | 
| 
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 |  |  | (705 | ) |  |  | (1,245 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total stockholders investment
 |  |  | 265,335 |  |  |  | 264,905 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 |  | $ | 599,089 |  |  | $ | 590,822 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    52
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
    CONSOLIDATED
    STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
 |  | $ | 696,786 |  |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
 |  |  | 620,145 |  |  |  | 768,913 |  |  |  | 620,031 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
 |  |  | 76,641 |  |  |  | 149,838 |  |  |  | 134,450 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
 |  |  | 55,493 |  |  |  | 51,950 |  |  |  | 44,564 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
 |  |  | 894 |  |  |  | 414 |  |  |  | 358 |  | 
| 
    RESTRUCTURING COSTS
 |  |  | 1,433 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
 |  |  | 18,821 |  |  |  | 97,474 |  |  |  | 89,528 |  | 
| 
    OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
 |  |  | 9,361 |  |  |  | (3,468 | ) |  |  | (3,741 | ) | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE
 |  |  | 14,147 |  |  |  | 14,829 |  |  |  | 13,195 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
 |  |  | 149 |  |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Loss) Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
 |  |  | (4,836 | ) |  |  | 85,795 |  |  |  | 78,549 |  | 
| 
    (BENEFIT) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
 |  |  | (1,585 | ) |  |  | 27,745 |  |  |  | 29,138 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (LOSS) INCOME
 |  | $ | (3,251 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (LOSS) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
 |  | $ | (0.15 | ) |  | $ | 2.74 |  |  | $ | 2.54 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted
 |  | $ | (0.15 | ) |  | $ | 2.69 |  |  | $ | 2.51 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
 |  |  | 21,439 |  |  |  | 21,151 |  |  |  | 19,440 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted
 |  |  | 21,439 |  |  |  | 21,545 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    53
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
    CONSOLIDATED
    STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
    Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accum. 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Retained 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Stock 
 |  |  | Additional 
 |  |  | Earnings 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Comp. 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Common Stock |  |  | Treasury 
 |  |  | Subscription 
 |  |  | Paid-In 
 |  |  | (Accum. 
 |  |  | Deferred 
 |  |  | Income / 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Shares |  |  | Amount |  |  | Stock |  |  | Receivable |  |  | Capital |  |  | Deficit) |  |  | Comp. |  |  | (Loss) |  |  | Total |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    BALANCE  December 31, 2004
 |  |  | 17,987,497 |  |  | $ | 180 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (175 | ) |  | $ | 123,660 |  |  | $ | (15,454 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,835 |  |  | $ | 111,046 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of common stock
 |  |  | 2,671,229 |  |  |  | 26 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,710 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,736 |  | 
| 
    Exercise of common stock under stock option and equity incentive
    plans
 |  |  | 319,928 |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,882 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,885 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of restricted stock
 |  |  | 167,300 |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,262 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,262 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
| 
    Stock subscriptions received
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 175 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 175 |  | 
| 
    Comprehensive income:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49,411 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49,411 |  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation adjustment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,645 | ) |  |  | (3,645 | ) | 
| 
    Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (533 | ) |  |  | (533 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total comprehensive income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45,233 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    BALANCE  December 31, 2005
 |  |  | 21,145,954 |  |  | $ | 211 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 172,514 |  |  | $ | 33,957 |  |  | $ | (3,262 | ) |  | $ | (1,343 | ) |  | $ | 202,077 |  | 
| 
    Exercise of common stock under stock option and equity incentive
    plans
 |  |  | 341,685 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,141 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,145 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of restricted stock
 |  |  | 54,328 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Effect of accounting change  SFAS 123(R)
 |  |  | (167,300 | ) |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,262 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,262 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Treasury stock purchased from employees at cost
 |  |  | (5,836 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit  equity transactions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  | 
| 
    Comprehensive income:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58,050 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58,050 |  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation adjustment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,874 |  |  |  | 3,874 |  | 
| 
    Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (304 | ) |  |  | (304 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total comprehensive income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61,620 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158, net
    of tax
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,472 | ) |  |  | (3,472 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    BALANCE  December 31, 2006
 |  |  | 21,368,831 |  |  | $ | 214 |  |  | $ | (115 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 174,044 |  |  | $ | 92,007 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (1,245 | ) |  | $ | 264,905 |  | 
| 
    Exercise of common stock under stock option and equity incentive
    plans
 |  |  | 68,778 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 463 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 463 |  | 
| 
    Issuance of restricted stock
 |  |  | 121,522 |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    Treasury stock purchased from employees at cost
 |  |  | (22,317 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (299 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (299 | ) | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,084 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,084 |  | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit  equity transactions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (170 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (170 | ) | 
| 
    Comprehensive income:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,251 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,251 | ) | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation adjustment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (589 | ) |  |  | (589 | ) | 
| 
    Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,296 |  |  |  | 1,296 |  | 
| 
    Derivative instruments
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (167 | ) |  |  | (167 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total comprehensive income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,711 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjustment to initially apply FIN 48, net of tax
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    BALANCE  December 31, 2007
 |  |  | 21,536,814 |  |  | $ | 215 |  |  | $ | (414 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 177,421 |  |  | $ | 88,818 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (705 | ) |  | $ | 265,335 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    54
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
    CONSOLIDATED
    STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net (loss) income
 |  | $ | (3,251 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
    by operating activities:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  | 16,425 |  |  |  | 14,983 |  |  |  | 12,064 |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
 |  |  | 859 |  |  |  | 895 |  |  |  | 848 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 |  |  | 149 |  |  |  | 318 |  |  |  | 1,525 |  | 
| 
    Shared-based compensation expense
 |  |  | 3,084 |  |  |  | 2,006 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gain on sale of assets
 |  |  | (10 | ) |  |  | (665 | ) |  |  | (7 | ) | 
| 
    Pension and other post-retirement curtailment gain
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,865 | ) |  |  | (3,097 | ) | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
 |  |  | 9,691 |  |  |  | 9,417 |  |  |  | 7,248 |  | 
| 
    Noncash loss (gain) on forward exchange contracts
 |  |  | 9,967 |  |  |  | (4,203 | ) |  |  | (3,793 | ) | 
| 
    Change in other operating items:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable
 |  |  | 28,347 |  |  |  | (4,369 | ) |  |  | (22,013 | ) | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  |  | 3,809 |  |  |  | (16,603 | ) |  |  | (11,571 | ) | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
 |  |  | 3,071 |  |  |  | (21,819 | ) |  |  | 9,958 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 |  |  | (24,830 | ) |  |  | 2,213 |  |  |  | 10,145 |  | 
| 
    Other assets and liabilities
 |  |  | 264 |  |  |  | 564 |  |  |  | (6,562 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by operating activities
 |  |  | 47,575 |  |  |  | 36,922 |  |  |  | 44,156 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 |  |  | (16,981 | ) |  |  | (19,327 | ) |  |  | (15,957 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of property plant and equipment
 |  |  | 549 |  |  |  | 352 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of other assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,032 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition and acquistion payments, net of cash received
 |  |  | (36,049 | ) |  |  | (9,452 | ) |  |  | (170,851 | ) | 
| 
    Other assets and liabilities
 |  |  | (811 | ) |  |  | (1,230 | ) |  |  | (1,761 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash (used in) investing activities
 |  |  | (53,292 | ) |  |  | (27,625 | ) |  |  | (188,569 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,914 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
    plans
 |  |  | 464 |  |  |  | 2,140 |  |  |  | 1,887 |  | 
| 
    Purchases of treasury stock from employees
 |  |  | (299 | ) |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plans
 |  |  | (170 | ) |  |  | 645 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit facility
 |  |  | (129,490 | ) |  |  | (74,711 | ) |  |  | (207,449 | ) | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit facility
 |  |  | 137,521 |  |  |  | 72,398 |  |  |  | 206,778 |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
 |  |  | (10,295 | ) |  |  | (28,210 | ) |  |  | (238,336 | ) | 
| 
    Long-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 227,459 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of 8% senior notes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150,000 |  | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease obligations
 |  |  | (125 | ) |  |  | (99 | ) |  |  | (46 | ) | 
| 
    Debt issuance costs and other, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,340 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
 |  |  | (2,394 | ) |  |  | (27,952 | ) |  |  | 188,547 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
    EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  | (1,843 | ) |  |  | (2,165 | ) |  |  | (4,889 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  | (9,954 | ) |  |  | (20,820 | ) |  |  | 39,245 |  | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
 |  |  | 19,821 |  |  |  | 40,641 |  |  |  | 1,396 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
 |  | $ | 9,867 |  |  | $ | 19,821 |  |  | $ | 40,641 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash paid for interest
 |  | $ | 13,185 |  |  | $ | 13,869 |  |  | $ | 6,340 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash (received) paid for income taxes, net
 |  | $ | (10,807 | ) |  | $ | 29,197 |  |  | $ | 24,603 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Unpaid purchases of property and equipment included in accounts
    payable
 |  | $ | 293 |  |  | $ | 3,062 |  |  | $ | 4,712 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
    consolidated financial statements.
    
    55
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
    Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
 
 
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries
    (CVG or the Company) design and
    manufacture seat systems, interior trim systems (including
    instrument and door panels, headliners, cabinetry, molded
    products and floor systems), cab structures and components,
    mirrors, wiper systems, electronic wiring harness assemblies and
    controls and switches for the global commercial vehicle market,
    including the heavy-duty truck market, the construction,
    military, bus, agriculture and specialty transportation markets.
    We have facilities located in the United States in Arizona,
    Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon,
    Tennessee, Virginia and Washington and outside of the United
    States in Australia, Belgium, China, Czech Republic, Mexico,
    Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 2. | Significant
    Accounting Policies | 
 
    Principles of Consolidation  The accompanying
    consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our
    wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts
    and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
    Use of Estimates  The preparation of financial
    statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
    accepted in the United States of America
    (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make
    estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
    assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
    liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
    reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
    period. Actual results may differ materially from those
    estimates.
 
    Cash and Cash Equivalents  Cash and cash
    equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an
    original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are
    stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
 
    Accounts Receivable  Trade accounts receivable
    are stated at current value less an allowance for doubtful
    accounts, which approximates fair value. This estimated
    allowance is based primarily on managements evaluation of
    specific balances as the balances become past due, the financial
    condition of our customers and our historical experience of
    write-offs. If not reserved through specific identification
    procedures, our general policy for uncollectible accounts is to
    reserve at a certain percentage threshold, based upon the aging
    categories of accounts receivable. Past due status is based upon
    the due date of the original amounts outstanding. When items are
    ultimately deemed uncollectible, they are charged off against
    the reserve previously established in the allowance for doubtful
    accounts.
 
    Inventories  We maintain our inventory
    primarily for the manufacture of goods for sale to our
    customers. Inventory is composed of three categories: Raw
    Materials, Work in Process, and Finished Goods. These categories
    are generally defined as follows: Raw Materials consist of
    materials that have been acquired and are available for the
    production cycle; Work in Process is composed of materials that
    have been moved into the production process and have some
    measurable amount of labor and overhead added; Finished Goods
    are materials with added labor and overhead that have completed
    the production cycle and are awaiting sale and delivery to
    customers.
 
    Inventories are valued at the lower of
    first-in,
    first-out (FIFO) cost or market. Cost includes
    applicable material, labor and overhead. We value our finished
    goods inventory at a standard cost that is periodically adjusted
    to approximate actual cost. Inventory quantities on-hand are
    regularly reviewed, and where necessary, provisions for excess
    and obsolete inventory are recorded based primarily on our
    estimated production requirements driven by current market
    volumes. Excess and obsolete provisions may vary by product
    depending upon future potential use of the product.
    
    56
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Property, Plant and Equipment  Property, plant
    and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated
    depreciation. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is
    computed using the straight-line method over the following
    estimated useful lives:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Buildings and improvements
 |  |  | 15 to 40 years |  | 
| 
    Machinery and equipment
 |  |  | 3 to 20 years |  | 
| 
    Tools and dies
 |  |  | 5 years |  | 
| 
    Computer hardware and software
 |  |  | 3 years |  | 
 
    Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
    as incurred. Expenditures for major betterments and renewals
    that extend the useful lives of property, plant and equipment
    are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining useful lives
    of the asset. When assets are retired or sold, the cost and
    related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
    and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the results of
    operations. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
    straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
    improvements or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter.
    Accelerated depreciation methods are used for tax reporting
    purposes.
 
    We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
    Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
    Assets, which provides a single accounting model for
    impairment of long-lived assets. We had no impairments during
    2007, 2006, or 2005.
 
    Intangible
    Assets  Indefinite-Lived
 
    Basis for
    Accounting Treatment
 
    Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of customer
    relationships acquired in the 2005 acquisitions of Mayflower and
    Monona. We have accounted for these customer relationships as
    indefinite-lived intangible assets, which we believe is
    appropriate based upon the following circumstances and
    conditions under which we operate:
 
    Sourcing,
    Barriers to Entry and Competitor Risks
 
    The customer sourcing decision for the Mayflower and Monona
    businesses is heavily predicated on price, quality, delivery and
    the overall customer relationship. Absent a significant change
    in any or all of these factors, it is unlikely that a customer
    would source production to an alternate supplier. In addition,
    the factors listed below impose a high barrier for new
    competitors to enter into this industry. Historical experience
    indicates that Mayflower and Monona have not lost any primary
    customers
    and/or
    relationships due to these factors and such loss is not
    anticipated in the foreseeable future for the following reasons:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Costs associated with setting up a new production line,
    including tooling costs, are typically cost prohibitive in a
    competitive pricing environment; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The risk associated with potential production delays and a
    disruption to the supply chain typically outweighs any potential
    economic benefit; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Significant initial outlays of capital and institutional
    production knowledge represent a significant barrier to entry.
    Due to the asset-intensive nature of the businesses, a new
    competitor would require a substantial amount of initial capital; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Changeover costs are high both from an economic and risk
    standpoint; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The highly complex nature of successfully producing electronic
    wiring harnesses and complete cab structures in accordance with
    OEM quality standards makes it difficult for a competitor to
    enter the business; and | 
    
    57
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | There is significant risk in operating the businesses as a
    result of the highly customized nature of the business. For
    example, production runs in the commercial vehicle business are
    significantly smaller and are more build to order in
    nature which requires the systems, expertise, equipment and
    logistics in order to be successful. | 
 
    These costs and risks are the primary prohibiting factors which
    preclude our customers from sourcing their business elsewhere at
    any given time.
 
    Duration
    and Strength of Existing Customer Relationships/Concentrations
    of Revenue
 
    Mayflower and Monona have long-standing relationships with their
    existing customers and have experienced de minimis historical
    attrition. These relationships have endured over time and,
    accordingly, an assumption of prospective attrition is
    inconsistent with this historical experience and
    managements expectations. Both Mayflower and Monona have a
    limited customer base, consisting of three primary customers,
    that has existed for many years, and we had pre-existing
    long-standing relationships with the same primary customers
    prior to the acquisitions of Mayflower and Monona, which in most
    cases have exceeded a period of 40 years. We believe the
    addition of Mayflower and Monona further strengthens our
    existing customer relationships with such customers.
    Specifically:
 
    Mayflower and Mononas relationships with their
    customers key decision-making personnel are mature and
    stable.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflowers and Mononas customers typically make
    purchasing decisions through a team approach versus a single
    decision maker. Mayflower and Monona have historically
    maintained strong relationships with individuals at all levels
    of the decision making process including the engineering,
    operations and purchasing functions in order to successfully
    minimize the impact of any employee turnover at the customer
    level. | 
 
    The top three customers of Mayflower and Monona have been
    established customers for a substantial period of time.
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower has had relationships with Volvo/Mack, Freightliner
    and International since 1965, 1997 and 2001, respectively. We
    and/or our
    predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with these
    same customers since 1949, 1954 and 1950, respectively. These
    customers comprised approximately 89%, 88% and 85% of
    Mayflowers revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Monona has had relationships with Deere & Co.,
    Caterpillar and Oshkosh since 1969, 1970 and 1985, respectively.
    We and/or
    our predecessor entities, had pre-existing relationships with
    these same customers since 1987, 1958 and 1950, respectively.
    These customers comprised approximately 84%, 85% and 88% of
    Mononas revenues for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. | 
 
    Valuation
    Methodology
 
    For valuation purposes, the income approach using the discounted
    cash flow method was employed for the purpose of evaluating the
    Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets.
    Under this approach, we determined that the fair value of the
    Mayflower and Monona customer relationship intangible assets at
    their dates of acquisition was $45.9 million and
    $28.9 million, respectively.
 
    Significant assumptions used in the valuation and determination
    of an indefinite useful life for these customer relationship
    intangible assets included the following:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | The revenue projections that we relied upon to substantiate the
    economic consideration paid for the businesses is almost
    exclusively tied to the existing customer base. With regard to
    the valuation process, we projected less than 1% of total
    revenue in 2005 and 2006 to be lost due to core customer
    attrition and no core customer attrition thereafter. | 
    
    58
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Contributory asset charges were deducted for assets that
    contribute to income generation including: (i) net working
    capital; (ii) personal property; (iii) real property;
    (iv) tradename and trademarks; and (v) an assembled
    workforce. | 
|  | 
    |  |  | The cash flows associated with the customer relationships
    acquired in the Mayflower and Monona transactions were
    discounted at a rate of return of 25.0% and 29.5%, respectively,
    which is approximately equal to the equity rate of return. | 
 
    Intangible
    Asset Impairment  Accounting Treatment
 
    If Mayflower
    and/or
    Monona were to prospectively lose any of their customers, in
    accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 16 and 17 of
    SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
    Assets, we would perform an intangible asset impairment test
    to determine the impact of the loss on the customer relationship
    intangible asset and if impairment was indicated, we would
    record an impairment loss in our consolidated statement of
    operations.
 
    Other Assets  Other assets primarily consist
    of long-term supply contracts of approximately $3.8 million
    at December 31, 2007 and approximately $3.0 million at
    December 31, 2006, fair value of foreign exchange contracts
    of approximately $0.0 million in 2007 and approximately
    $8.5 million in 2006 and debt financing costs of
    approximately $3.9 million at December 31, 2007 and
    approximately $4.8 million at December 31, 2006, which
    are being amortized over the term of the related obligations.
 
    Revenue Recognition  Product revenue is
    derived from sales of our various manufactured products. Our
    revenue recognition policy is in accordance with the SECs
    SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial
    Statements, SAB No. 104, Revenue
    Recognition, and other authoritative accounting literature.
    In accordance with the provisions of such authoritative
    accounting literature, we recognize revenue when
    1) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
    2) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
    3) there is a fixed or determinable price, and
    4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Our products are
    generally shipped from our facilities to our customers, which is
    when title passes to the customer for substantially all of our
    revenues.
 
    Provisions for anticipated contract losses are recognized at the
    time they become evident. In that regard, in certain instances,
    we may be committed under existing agreements to supply product
    to our customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to
    cover the cost to produce such product. In such situations, we
    record a provision for the estimated future amount of such
    losses. Such losses are recognized at the time that the loss is
    probable and reasonably estimable and are recorded at the
    minimum amount necessary to fulfill our obligations to our
    customers. We had approximately $0.4 million as of
    December 31, 2007 and no such provision as of
    December 31, 2006. These amounts, as they relate to the
    year ended December 31, 2007 are included within accrued
    liabilities and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
    consolidated balance sheets.
 
    Warranty  We are subject to warranty claims
    for products that fail to perform as expected due to design or
    manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to require their
    outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their products and
    bear the cost of repair or replacement of such products.
    Depending on the terms under which we supply products to our
    customers, a customer may hold us responsible for some or all of
    the repair or replacement costs of defective products, when the
    product supplied did not perform as represented. Our policy is
    to record provisions for estimated future customer warranty
    costs based on historical trends and current economic factors.
    These amounts, as they relate to the years ended
    December 31, 2007 and 2006 are included within accrued
    expenses
    
    59
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The following
    presents a summary of the warranty provision for the years ended
    December 31 (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of the year
 |  | $ | 5,197 |  |  | $ | 7,117 |  | 
| 
    Increase due to acquisitions
 |  |  | 269 |  |  |  | 12 |  | 
| 
    Additional provisions recorded
 |  |  | 2,155 |  |  |  | 3,391 |  | 
| 
    Deduction for payments made
 |  |  | (3,691 | ) |  |  | (5,366 | ) | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
 |  |  | 28 |  |  |  | 43 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of year
 |  | $ | 3,958 |  |  | $ | 5,197 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Income Taxes  We account for income taxes
    following the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
    Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires recognition
    of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
    tax consequences of events that have been included in our
    financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred
    tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
    difference between the financial statement and tax basis of
    assets and liabilities using enacted tax laws and rates. In July
    2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
    in Income Taxes  an interpretation of SFAS 109.
    FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how
    companies should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in
    their financial statements, uncertain tax positions taken or
    expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, tax
    positions shall initially be recognized in the financial
    statements when it is more likely than not the position will be
    sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax
    positions shall initially and subsequently be measured as the
    largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of
    being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority
    assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
    FIN 48 also revises disclosure requirements to include an
    annual tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax benefits. The
    provisions of this interpretation are required to be adopted for
    fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2006. We
    adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007,
    and as a result, recognized approximately $62 thousand decrease
    in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was
    accounted for as an increase to the January 1, 2007 balance
    of retained earnings.
 
    Comprehensive (Loss)  We follow the provisions
    of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
    Income, which established standards for reporting and
    display of comprehensive income and its components.
    Comprehensive income reflects the change in equity of a business
    enterprise during a period from transactions and other events
    and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive (loss)
    represents net income adjusted for foreign currency translation
    adjustments, minimum pension liability and the deferred gain
    (loss) on certain derivative instruments utilized to hedge
    certain of our interest rate exposures. In accordance with
    SFAS No. 130, we have chosen to disclose comprehensive
    (loss) in the consolidated statements of stockholders
    investment. The components of accumulated other comprehensive
    (loss) consisted of the following as of December 31 (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Foreign currency translation adjustment
 |  | $ | 4,868 |  |  | $ | 5,457 |  | 
| 
    Pension liability
 |  |  | (5,406 | ) |  |  | (6,702 | ) | 
| 
    Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
 |  |  | (167 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | (705 | ) |  | $ | (1,245 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Fair Value of Financial Instruments  At
    December 31, 2007, our financial instruments consist of
    cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
    payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt, unless
    otherwise noted. The carrying value of these instruments
    approximates fair value as a result of the short duration of
    such instruments or due to the variability of the interest cost
    associated with such instruments.
    
    60
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Concentrations of Credit Risk  Financial
    instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of
    credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and
    accounts receivable. We place our cash equivalents with high
    credit-quality financial institutions. We sell products to
    various companies throughout the world in the ordinary course of
    business. We routinely assess the financial strength of our
    customers and maintain allowances for anticipated losses.
    Customers that accounted for a significant portion of
    consolidated revenues for each of the three years ended December
    31 were as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    PACCAR
 |  |  | 14 | % |  |  | 17 | % |  |  | 17 | % | 
| 
    International
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 19 |  | 
| 
    Caterpillar
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Freightliner
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 16 |  | 
| 
    Volvo/Mack
 |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 13 |  |  |  | 14 |  | 
 
    As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, receivables from these
    customers represented approximately 50% and 67% of total
    receivables, respectively.
 
    Foreign Currency Translation  Our functional
    currency is the local currency. Accordingly, all assets and
    liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated using
    exchange rates in effect at the end of the period and revenue
    and costs are translated using average exchange rates for the
    period. The related translation adjustments are reported in
    accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
    investment. Translation gains and losses arising from
    transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional
    currency of the entity involved are included in the results of
    operations.
 
    Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts 
    We use forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of our
    foreign currency transaction exposures of our United Kingdom
    operations. We estimate our projected revenues in certain
    foreign currencies or locations, and will hedge a portion or all
    of the anticipated long or short position. The contract duration
    is typically between three months and three years. These
    contracts are marked-to-market and the fair value is included in
    assets or liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
    sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or loss included other
    income and expense on our accompanying consolidated statements
    of operations. We do not hold or issue foreign exchange options
    or forward contracts for trading purposes. The following table
    summarizes the notional amount of our open foreign exchange
    contracts at December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Local 
 |  |  |  |  |  | U.S. $ 
 |  | 
|  |  | Currency 
 |  |  | U.S. $ 
 |  |  | Equivalent 
 |  | 
|  |  | Amount |  |  | Equivalent |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Commitments to sell currencies:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    U.S. Dollar
 |  |  | (598 | ) |  | $ | (598 | ) |  | $ | (598 | ) | 
| 
    Eurodollar
 |  |  | 49,336 |  |  |  | 69,329 |  |  |  | 72,797 |  | 
| 
    Swedish krona
 |  |  | 13,900 |  |  |  | 2,093 |  |  |  | 2,190 |  | 
| 
    Japanese yen
 |  |  | 3,150,200 |  |  |  | 32,114 |  |  |  | 29,948 |  | 
| 
    Australian Dollar
 |  |  | 5,350 |  |  |  | 4,502 |  |  |  | 4,616 |  | 
 
    The difference between the U.S. $ equivalent and
    U.S. $ equivalent fair value of approximately
    $1.5 million liability and $8.5 million asset is included
    in other long-term liabilities and other assets in the
    consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
    respectively.
 
    Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements  In
    July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, an interpretation of
    SFAS 109.  FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive
    model for how companies should recognize, measure, present, and
    disclose in their financial statements, uncertain tax positions
    taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under
    FIN 48, tax positions shall initially be recognized in the
    financial statements when it is more likely than not the
    
    61
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    position will be sustained upon examination by the tax
    authorities. Such tax positions shall initially and subsequently
    be measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater
    than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with
    the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and
    all relevant facts. FIN 48 also revises disclosure
    requirements to include an annual tabular rollforward of
    unrecognized tax benefits. The provisions of this interpretation
    are required to be adopted for fiscal periods beginning after
    December 15, 2006. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48
    on January 1, 2007, and as a result, recognized
    approximately $62 thousand decrease in the liability for
    unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an
    increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained
    earnings.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
    Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
    establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to
    U.S. GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes
    a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure
    about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is
    effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
    2007. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of
    adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 157 on our
    consolidated financial position and results of operations.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
    Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
    Other Postretirement Plans  an amendment of FASB
    Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).
    SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the
    funded status of defined benefit pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or liability in our
    consolidated balance sheets and to recognize changes in that
    funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
    accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
    investment. SFAS No. 158 also requires that, beginning
    in 2008, our assumptions used to measure our annual defined
    benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans be
    determined as of the balance sheet date, and all plan assets and
    liabilities be reported as of that date. Currently, the
    assumptions used to measure our annual defined benefit pension
    and other post-retirement benefit plan expenses are determined
    as of October 1 or December 31 (measurement dates) for our
    various plans, and all plan assets and liabilities are generally
    reported as of those dates. We are currently assessing the
    impact of the measurement date change of SFAS 158 on our
    consolidated financial positions and results of operations.
 
    In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
    Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
    Liabilities. SFAS No. 159, which amends
    SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
    Debt and Equity Securities, allows certain financial assets
    and liabilities to be recognized, at our election, at fair
    market value, with any gains or losses for the period recorded
    in the statement of income. SFAS No. 159 is effective
    for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
    currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on our
    consolidated financial positions and results of operations.
 
    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
    Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 160,
    Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Finance
    Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.
    SFAS No. 141(R) will change how business acquisitions
    are accounted for and will impact financial statements both on
    the acquisition date and in subsequent periods.
    SFAS No. 160 will change the accounting and reporting
    for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as
    noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of
    equity. Early adoption is prohibited for both standards. The
    provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) and
    SFAS No. 160 are effective for our 2009 fiscal year
    beginning January 1, 2009, and are to be applied
    prospectively.
 
 
    In October 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock
    of PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o. (PEKM), an electronic
    wire harness manufacturer primarily for the commercial truck
    market, with facilities in the Czech Republic and the Ukraine
    for approximately $21.2 million in cash. The acquisition
    was financed with borrowings from our revolving credit facility.
    The operating results of PEKM have been included in our 2007
    consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
    From the date of acquisition through December 31, 2007 PEKM
    recorded revenues of approximately $15.5 million and an
    operating loss of approximately $0.1 million.
    
    62
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    In October 2007, we acquired the heavy-gauge thermoforming and
    injection molding assets of the Fabrication Division of Gage
    Industries, Inc. (Gage) for approximately
    $5.5 million in cash. The acquisition was financed with
    borrowings from our revolving credit facility. The operating
    results of Gage have been included in our 2007 consolidated
    financial statements since the date of acquisition. From the
    date of acquisition through December 31, 2007 Gage recorded
    revenues of approximately $1.9 million and an operating
    loss of approximately $0.3 million.
 
    In December 2007, we acquired substantially all of the assets of
    Short Bark Industries, LLC (SBI), a supplier of seat
    covers and various
    cut-and-sew
    trim products, for approximately $3.6 million in cash and
    approximately $2.3 million of net liabilities due to us.
    The acquisition was financed with borrowings from our revolving
    credit facility. The operating results of SBI have been included
    in our 2007 consolidated financial statements since the date of
    acquisition. From the date of acquisition through
    December 31, 2007 SBI recorded revenues of approximately
    $0.0 million and an operating loss of approximately
    $0.1 million.
 
    On a pro forma basis had the PEKM, Gage and SBI acquisitions
    been included in our consolidated financial statement for the
    full year 2007, our revenues would have increased by
    approximately $57.2 million and operating income would have
    increased by approximately $1.3 million, as shown in the
    following table (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | PEKM |  |  | Gage |  |  | SBI |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Revenue
 |  | $ | 39,147 |  |  | $ | 13,082 |  |  | $ | 4,940 |  |  | $ | 57,169 |  | 
| 
    Operating Income (Loss)
 |  | $ | 640 |  |  | $ | (409 | ) |  | $ | 1,021 |  |  | $ | 1,252 |  | 
 
    The PEKM, Gage and SBI acquisitions were accounted for by the
    purchase method of accounting. Under purchase accounting, the
    preliminary purchase price is allocated to the tangible and
    intangible assets and liabilities of the Company based upon
    their respective fair values. We continue to evaluate the
    purchase price allocation, including intangible assets,
    contingent liabilities and property, plant and equipment, and
    expect to revise the purchase price allocation as better
    information becomes available. The preliminary purchase price
    and costs associated with the acquisitions exceeded the
    preliminary fair value of the net assets acquired by
    approximately $26.9 million. Our valuation of goodwill as
    of December 31, 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | PEKM |  |  | Gage |  |  | SBI |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Contract purchase price
 |  | $ | 25,760 |  |  | $ | 5,500 |  |  | $ | 3,626 |  |  | $ | 34,886 |  | 
| 
    Working capital and other adjustments
 |  |  | (4,522 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,297 |  |  |  | (2,225 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Preliminary purchase price (cash consideration)
 |  |  | 21,238 |  |  |  | 5,500 |  |  |  | 5,923 |  |  |  | 32,661 |  | 
| 
    Transaction costs and other adjustments
 |  |  | (896 | ) |  |  | (20 | ) |  |  | (1,005 | ) |  |  | (1,921 | ) | 
| 
    Net assets at historical cost
 |  |  | (2,293 | ) |  |  | (4,168 | ) |  |  | 2,666 |  |  |  | (3,795 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Excess of purchase price over net assets acquired
 |  | $ | 18,049 |  |  | $ | 1,312 |  |  | $ | 7,584 |  |  | $ | 26,945 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    63
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
    SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, the
    preliminary purchase price as shown above is allocated to
    tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on their
    estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The
    preliminary purchase price allocation as of December 31,
    2007 was as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | PEKM |  |  | Gage |  |  | SBI |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Cash
 |  | $ | 2,519 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 32 |  |  | $ | 2,551 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable
 |  |  | 7,781 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 279 |  |  |  | 8,060 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  |  | 7,180 |  |  |  | 2,070 |  |  |  | 537 |  |  |  | 9,787 |  | 
| 
    Other current assets
 |  |  | 596 |  |  |  | 144 |  |  |  | 77 |  |  |  | 817 |  | 
| 
    Property, plant and equipment, net
 |  |  | 3,480 |  |  |  | 2,098 |  |  |  | 799 |  |  |  | 6,377 |  | 
| 
    Goodwill and other intangibles
 |  |  | 18,049 |  |  |  | 1,312 |  |  |  | 7,584 |  |  |  | 26,945 |  | 
| 
    Current liabilities
 |  |  | (13,482 | ) |  |  | (124 | ) |  |  | (3,353 | ) |  |  | (16,959 | ) | 
| 
    Other long-term liabilities
 |  |  | (2,366 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,366 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net assets acquired
 |  |  | 23,757 |  |  |  | 5,500 |  |  |  | 5,955 |  |  |  | 35,212 |  | 
| 
    Less: Cash received
 |  |  | (2,519 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (32 | ) |  |  | (2,551 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Contract purchase price
 |  | $ | 21,238 |  |  | $ | 5,500 |  |  | $ | 5,923 |  |  | $ | 32,661 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The following pro forma information presents the result of
    operations as if the 2007 acquisitions of PEKM, Gage and SBI and
    the 2006 acquisition of C.I.E.B. had taken place at the
    beginning of each period presented below. The pro forma results
    are not necessarily indicative of the financial position or
    result of operations had the acquisitions taken place on the
    dates indicated. In addition, the pro forma results are not
    necessarily indicative of the future financial or operating
    results.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  |  | (Unaudited) |  |  | (Unaudited) |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Revenue
 |  | $ | 753,955 |  |  | $ | 1,006,114 |  | 
| 
    Operating income
 |  | $ | 20,967 |  |  | $ | 102,502 |  | 
| 
    Net income
 |  | $ | (4,042 | ) |  | $ | 57,945 |  | 
| 
    Earnings Per Share:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic
 |  | $ | (0.19 | ) |  | $ | 2.74 |  | 
| 
    Diluted
 |  | $ | (0.19 | ) |  | $ | 2.69 |  | 
 
 
    Inventories consisted of the following as of December 31 (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Raw materials
 |  | $ | 62,129 |  |  | $ | 61,617 |  | 
| 
    Work in process
 |  |  | 19,811 |  |  |  | 14,436 |  | 
| 
    Finished goods
 |  |  | 19,862 |  |  |  | 17,314 |  | 
| 
    Less: excess and obsolete
 |  |  | (5,417 | ) |  |  | (4,644 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 96,385 |  |  | $ | 88,723 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    64
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
 
    Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31
    (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Compensation and benefits
 |  | $ | 11,389 |  |  | $ | 16,021 |  | 
| 
    Interest
 |  |  | 6,039 |  |  |  | 6,104 |  | 
| 
    Warranty costs
 |  |  | 3,958 |  |  |  | 5,197 |  | 
| 
    Legal/professional fees
 |  |  | 3,099 |  |  |  | 2,495 |  | 
| 
    Income and other taxes
 |  |  | 728 |  |  |  | 883 |  | 
| 
    Facility closure and consolidation costs
 |  |  | 646 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other
 |  |  | 7,256 |  |  |  | 10,270 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 33,115 |  |  | $ | 40,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 6. | Restructuring
    and Integration | 
 
    Restructuring  In 2007, our Board of Directors
    approved the closing of our Seattle, Washington facility and
    transfer of operations to existing plants throughout the United
    States in order to improve customer service and strengthen our
    long-term competitive position. The decision to close the
    Seattle facility and redistribute the work was the result of a
    long-term analysis of changing market requirements, including
    the consolidation of product lines and closer proximity to
    customer operations. The closure was substantially completed as
    of December 31, 2007. We estimate that we will record in
    accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
    Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, total charges
    of approximately $2.4 million, consisting of employee
    related costs of approximately $1.1 million, non-cash
    expense related to the write-down of certain assets of
    approximately $0.4 million and facility exit and other
    contractual costs of approximately $0.9 million. The
    Company has incurred costs of approximately $1.4 million in
    the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 consisting of
    approximately $0.8 million employee related costs,
    $0.5 million of facility exit and other contractual costs
    and $0.1 million in noncash expense related to the
    write-down of certain assets. We estimate that approximately
    $1.4 million of the total charges will be incurred as
    future cash expenditures.
 
    A summary of these restructuring activities for the years ended
    December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Facility Exit 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | and Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Employee 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Costs |  |  | Costs |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2006
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Provisions
 |  |  | 810 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 810 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  | (164 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (164 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2007
 |  | $ | 646 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 646 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Integration  In connection with the
    acquisitions of Bostrom plc and the predecessor to CVS, facility
    consolidation plans were designed and implemented to reduce the
    cost structure and to better integrate the acquired operations.
    Purchase liabilities recorded as part of the acquisitions
    included approximately $3.3 million for costs associated
    with the shutdown and consolidation of certain acquired
    facilities and severance and other contractual costs. At
    December 31, 2007, we had principally completed our actions
    under these plans, other than certain
    
    65
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    contractual commitments, which continue through 2008. Summarized
    below is the activity related to these actions (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Facility Exit 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Employee 
 |  |  | and Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Costs |  |  | Contractual Costs |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2005
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 317 |  |  | $ | 317 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (70 | ) |  |  | (70 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2006
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 247 |  |  |  | 247 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (141 | ) |  |  | (141 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2007
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 106 |  |  | $ | 106 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    In connection with the June 8, 2005 acquisition of Monona,
    plans were established to realign certain operations in an
    effort to achieve synergies between us and Monona, including the
    closure of our Spring Green, Wisconsin operations and the
    administrative office located in Naperville, Illinois. Purchase
    liabilities recorded as part of the acquisition include
    approximately $0.9 million related to employee severance
    and associated benefits for approximately 100 employees and
    approximately $1.1 million related to facility exit,
    transition and other estimated costs. These activities were
    completed as of December 31, 2007. Summarized below is the
    activity related to these actions (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Facility Exit 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Employee 
 |  |  | and Other 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Costs |  |  | Contractual Costs |  |  | Total |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2005
 |  | $ | 946 |  |  | $ | 1,067 |  |  | $ | 2,013 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  | (886 | ) |  |  | (1,067 | ) |  |  | (1,953 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2006
 |  | $ | 60 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 60 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  | (60 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (60 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2007
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    Debt consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Revolving credit facilities bore interest at a weighted average
    of 8.5% as of December 31, 2007 and 7.1% as of
    December 31, 2006 due 2010
 |  | $ | 9,500 |  |  | $ | 1,469 |  | 
| 
    Term loans, with principal and interest payable quarterly, bore
    interest at a weighted average rate of 6.8% as of
    December 31, 2006
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,295 |  | 
| 
    8.0% senior notes due 2013
 |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  | 150,000 |  | 
| 
    Other
 |  |  | 225 |  |  |  | 350 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 159,725 |  |  |  | 162,114 |  | 
| 
    Less current maturities
 |  |  | 116 |  |  |  | 2,158 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 159,609 |  |  | $ | 159,956 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    66
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Future maturities of debt as of December 31, 2007 are as
    follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Year Ending December 31,
 |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2008
 |  | $ | 116 |  | 
| 
    2009
 |  |  | 106 |  | 
| 
    2010
 |  |  | 9,502 |  | 
| 
    2011
 |  |  | 1 |  | 
| 
    2012
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Thereafter
 |  |  | 150,000 |  | 
 
    Credit Agreement  We account for amendments to
    our revolving credit facility under the provisions of EITF Issue
    No. 98-14,
    Debtors Accounting for the Changes in Line-of-Credit or
    Revolving-Debt Arrangements
    (EITF 98-14),
    and our term loan and 8.0% senior notes under the
    provisions of EITF Issue
    No. 96-19,
    Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of
    Debt Instruments
    (EITF 96-19).
    Historically, we have periodically amended the terms of our
    revolving credit facility and term loan to increase or decrease
    the individual and collective borrowing base of the instruments
    on an as needed basis. We have not modified the terms of our
    8.0% senior notes subsequent to the original offering date.
    In connection with an amendment of our revolving credit
    facility, bank fees incurred are deferred and amortized over the
    term of the new arrangement and, if applicable, any outstanding
    deferred fees are expensed proportionately or in total, as
    appropriate per the guidance of
    EITF 98-14.
    In connection with an amendment of our term loan, under the
    terms of
    EITF 96-19,
    bank and any third-party fees are either expensed as an
    extinguishment of debt or deferred and amortized over the term
    of the agreement based upon whether or not the old and new debt
    instruments are substantially different.
 
    On June 30, 2006, we repaid approximately
    $25.0 million of our U.S. dollar denominated term
    loan. The repayment of the term loan reduced the principal
    amount of the term loan from approximately $40 million to
    $15 million. In connection with this loan repayment,
    approximately $0.3 million of deferred fees, representing a
    proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
    loss on early extinguishment of debt.
 
    On June 29, 2007, we repaid our foreign denominated term
    loan in full. In connection with this loan repayment,
    approximately $0.1 million of deferred fees, representing a
    proportionate amount of total deferred fees, were expensed as a
    loss on early extinguishment of debt.
 
    On August 16, 2007, we entered into an Amendment and Waiver
    Letter to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
    Amendment and Waiver Letter). Pursuant to the terms
    of the Amendment and Waiver Letter, the lenders consented to
    increase the size of permitted acquisitions to $40 million
    per fiscal year and waived any default or event of default in
    connection with intercompany loans, contributions to capital,
    investments in capital stock or mixed stock and indebtedness
    certificates provided in connection with permitted acquisitions.
 
    On September 28, 2007, we entered into the Tenth Amendment
    to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the Tenth
    Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the Tenth Amendment,
    the lenders consented to various amendments, including but not
    limited to, changes to reporting requirements and financial
    ratios, which included the fixed charge coverage ratio and the
    maximum ratio of total indebtedness. Based on the provisions of
    EITF 98-14,
    approximately $0.1 million third party fees relating to the
    credit agreement were capitalized and are being amortized over
    the remaining life of the senior credit agreement.
 
    On March 11, 2008, we entered into the Eleventh Amendment
    to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the
    Eleventh Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the
    Eleventh Amendment, the banks party thereto consented to various
    amendments to the senior credit agreement, including but not
    limited to: (i) amendments to the fixed charge ratio and
    the leverage ratio to provide the Company increased flexibility
    in the near future; (ii) an amendment to the applicable
    margin pricing grid to include increased rates for prime rate
    and LIBOR borrowings when the Companys leverage ratio is
    equal to or greater than 4.0x; (iii) a reduction in the
    size of the revolving credit facility from $100 million to
    $50 million, subject to increases to $75 million and
    then to
    
    67
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    $100 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions,
    including meeting certain financial covenant thresholds;
    (iv) increases in certain baskets in the indebtedness,
    asset disposition, investment and lien covenants contained in
    the senior credit agreement; and (v) an amendment to permit
    proposed future tax planning.
 
    As of December 31, 2007, approximately $3.9 million in
    deferred fees relating to previous amendments of our senior
    credit agreement and fees related to the 8.0% senior note
    offering were outstanding and are being amortized over the life
    of the agreements.
 
    The senior credit agreement provides us with the ability to
    denominate a portion of our borrowings in foreign currencies. As
    of December 31, 2007, $9.5 million of the revolving
    credit facility borrowings were denominated in U.S. dollars
    and none of the revolving credit facility borrowings were
    denominated in British pounds sterling.
 
    Terms, Covenants and Compliance Status  Our
    senior credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants,
    including limiting indebtedness, rental obligations, investments
    and cash dividends, and also requires the maintenance of certain
    financial ratios, including fixed charge coverage and funded
    debt to EBITDA as defined by our senior credit agreement. We
    were in compliance with respect to these covenants as of
    December 31, 2007. Under this agreement, borrowings bear
    interest at various rates plus a margin based on certain
    financial ratios. Borrowings under the senior credit agreement
    are secured by specifically identified assets, comprising in
    total, substantially all assets of the company and its
    subsidiaries party to the financing, except that the assets of
    our foreign subsidiaries party to the financing only secure
    foreign borrowings. Additionally, as of December 31, 2007,
    we had outstanding letters of credit of approximately
    $1.8 million.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 8. | Goodwill
    and Intangible Assets | 
 
    Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition purchase price
    over the fair value of net assets acquired. We review goodwill
    and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually
    in the second fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in
    circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable
    in accordance with SFAS No. 142. We review
    definite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the
    provisions of SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144.
    The provisions of SFAS No. 142 require that a two-step
    impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we
    compare the fair value of our reporting unit to our carrying
    value. Our reporting unit is consistent with the reportable
    segment identified in Note 10 to the consolidated financial
    statements contained in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2006. If the fair value of
    the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
    assigned to that unit, goodwill is considered not impaired and
    we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying
    value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds
    the fair value of the reporting unit, then we must perform the
    second step of the impairment test in order to determine the
    implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill. If the
    carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds the
    implied fair value, then we would record an impairment loss
    equal to the difference. SFAS No. 142 also requires
    that the fair value of the purchased intangible assets with
    indefinite lives be estimated and compared to the carrying
    value. We estimate the fair value of these intangible assets
    using an income approach. We recognize an impairment loss when
    the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than
    the carrying value. In this regard, management considers the
    following indicators in determining if events or changes in
    circumstances have occurred indicating that the recoverability
    of the carrying amount of indefinite-lived and amortizing
    intangible assets should be assessed: (1) a significant
    decrease in the market value of an asset; (2) a significant
    change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used or a
    significant physical change in an asset; (3) a significant
    adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
    could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or
    assessment by a regulator; (4) an accumulation of costs
    significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to
    acquire or construct an asset; and (5) a current period
    operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating
    or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that
    demonstrates continuing losses associated with an asset used for
    the purpose of producing revenue. Our annual goodwill analysis
    was performed during the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and did
    not result in an impairment charge.
    
    68
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances change,
    a determination is made by management, in accordance with
    SFAS No. 144 to ascertain whether property and
    equipment and certain definite-lived intangibles have been
    impaired based on the sum of expected future undiscounted cash
    flows from operating activities. If the estimated net cash flows
    are less than the carrying amount of such assets, we will
    recognize an impairment loss in an amount necessary to write
    down the assets to fair value as determined from expected future
    discounted cash flows. In accordance with SFAS 142, we test
    intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for
    impairment annually or when conditions indicate impairment may
    have occurred.
 
    Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in
    nature and involves the use of significant estimates and
    assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue
    growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected
    future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic
    and market conditions and determination of appropriate market
    comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we
    believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and
    inherently uncertain. The valuation approaches we use include
    the Income Approach (the Discounted Cash Flow Method) and the
    Market Approach (the Guideline Company and Transaction Methods)
    to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit; earnings are
    emphasized in the Discounted Cash Flow, Guideline Company, and
    the Transaction Methods. In addition, these methods utilize
    market data in the derivation of a value estimate and are
    forward-looking in nature. The Discounted Cash Flow Method
    utilizes a market-derived rate of return to discount anticipated
    performance, while the Guideline Company Method and the
    Transaction Method incorporate multiples that are based on the
    markets assessment of future performance. Actual future
    results may differ materially from those estimates.
 
    Principal
    Factors Contributing to the Recognition of Goodwill
 
    Mayflower:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of Mayflower and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower is the only non-captive producer of complete steel and
    aluminum truck cabs for the commercial vehicle sector in North
    America; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe the acquisition allows us to be the only supplier
    worldwide to offer complete cab systems in sequence, integrating
    interior trim and seats with the cab structure; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe the acquisition gives us a leading position in North
    American cab structures and complete cab assemblies, as well as
    full service cab and sleeper engineering and development
    capabilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Mayflower broadens our revenue base at International, Volvo/Mack
    and Freightliner and enhances our cross-selling opportunities. | 
 
    Monona:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of Monona and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Monona operates in the U.S. and Mexico which enhances our
    international footprint, solidifies our domestic footprint and
    allows for cost savings opportunities; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe Monona enhances our ability to offer comprehensive
    cab systems to our customers and expands our electronic assembly
    capabilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Monona broadens our revenue base at Caterpillar, Oshkosh and
    Deere & Co. and enhances our cross-selling
    opportunities. | 
    
    69
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
 
    Cabarrus:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of Cabarrus and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Cabarrus offers injection molding capabilities and expertise
    which enhances our molding and plastics product
    portfolio; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe Cabarrus offers cross-selling opportunities as well
    as the capability to in-source products for cost savings
    opportunities. | 
 
    C.I.E.B.:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of C.I.E.B. and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | C.I.E.B. provides us with a wide variety of bus and truck seats,
    complements our existing product offering and provides us with a
    well positioned platform to utilize as a building block for our
    global expansion and sourcing efforts. | 
 
    PEKM:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of PEKM and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | PEKM operates in the Czech Republic and Ukraine which enhances
    our international manufacturing presence in developing regions
    of the world and allows for cost savings opportunities; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe PEKM enhances our ability to offer comprehensive
    products and services to new and existing customers and markets
    and expands our electronic wire harness assembly
    capabilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | PEKM offers cross-selling opportunities and provides us with new
    customers, MAN, Daimler and Skoda. | 
 
    Gage:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of Gage and the
    principal factors that contributed to a purchase price that
    resulted in the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Gage offers heavy-gauge thermoforming capabilities and expertise
    which enhances our interior trim capabilities; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | We believe Gage offers cross-selling opportunities as well as
    the capability to in-source products for cost savings
    opportunities and broadens our revenue base at existing
    customers. | 
 
    SBI:
 
    The primary reasons for the acquisition of SBI and the principal
    factors that contributed to a purchase price that resulted in
    the recognition of goodwill were:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | SBI offers
    cut-and-sew
    capabilities and expertise which enhances our ability to
    centralize our existing
    cut-and-sew
    operations for cost savings opportunities | 
    
    70
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
 
    The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the fiscal
    year ended December 31, 2007, were comprised of the
    following (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2006
 |  | $ | 134,766 |  | 
| 
    Increase due to acquisition
 |  |  | 16,687 |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition adjustments
 |  |  | (588 | ) | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
 |  |  | 324 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2007
 |  | $ | 151,189 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded
    approximately $0.6 million of post acquisition adjustments
    as we finalize our purchase price allocations.
 
    Our intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 were
    comprised of the following, respectively (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2007 |  | 
|  |  | Weighted- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Amortization 
 |  |  | Gross Carrying 
 |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  | Net Carrying 
 |  | 
|  |  | Period |  |  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Amount |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Definite-lived intangible assets:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Tradenames/Trademarks
 |  |  | 30 years |  |  | $ | 9,790 |  |  | $ | (915 | ) |  | $ | 8,875 |  | 
| 
    Licenses
 |  |  | 7 years |  |  |  | 438 |  |  |  | (313 | ) |  |  | 125 |  | 
| 
    Customer relationships
 |  |  | 15 years |  |  |  | 14,234 |  |  |  | (459 | ) |  |  | 13,775 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 24,462 |  |  | $ | (1,687 | ) |  | $ | 22,775 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 151,189 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 151,189 |  | 
| 
    Customer relationships
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 225,989 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 225,989 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total consolidated goodwill and intangible assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 248,764 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | December 31, 2006 |  | 
|  |  | Weighted- 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Amortization 
 |  |  | Gross Carrying 
 |  |  | Accumulated 
 |  |  | Net Carrying 
 |  | 
|  |  | Period |  |  | Amount |  |  | Amortization |  |  | Amount |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Definite-lived intangible assets:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Tradenames/Trademarks
 |  |  | 30 years |  |  | $ | 9,790 |  |  | $ | (589 | ) |  | $ | 9,201 |  | 
| 
    Licenses
 |  |  | 7 years |  |  |  | 438 |  |  |  | (251 | ) |  |  | 187 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 10,228 |  |  | $ | (840 | ) |  | $ | 9,388 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Goodwill
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 134,766 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 134,766 |  | 
| 
    Customer relationships
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74,800 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 209,566 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 209,566 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total consolidated goodwill and intangible assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 218,954 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    71
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    The aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was
    approximately $0.9 million, $0.4 million and
    $0.3 million for the fiscal years ended December 31,
    2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
    The estimated intangible asset amortization expense for the five
    succeeding fiscal years ending after December 31, 2007, is
    as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    2008
 |  | $ | 1,338 |  | 
| 
    2009
 |  | $ | 1,338 |  | 
| 
    2010
 |  | $ | 1,275 |  | 
| 
    2011
 |  | $ | 1,275 |  | 
| 
    2012
 |  | $ | 1,275 |  | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | 9. | Accounting
    for Income Taxes | 
 
    Pre-tax (loss) income consisted of the following for the years
    ended December 31 (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Domestic
 |  | $ | (15,296 | ) |  | $ | 76,336 |  |  | $ | 70,673 |  | 
| 
    Foreign
 |  |  | 10,460 |  |  |  | 9,459 |  |  |  | 7,876 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
 |  | $ | (4,836 | ) |  | $ | 85,795 |  |  | $ | 78,549 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the statutory rates
    to the reported income tax provision for the years ended
    December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Federal provision at statutory rate
 |  | $ | (1,693 | ) |  | $ | 30,028 |  |  | $ | 27,492 |  | 
| 
    U.S. tax on foreign income
 |  |  | 1,917 |  |  |  | 272 |  |  |  | 702 |  | 
| 
    Foreign provision in excess (less) than U.S. tax rate
 |  |  | (941 | ) |  |  | (231 | ) |  |  | (242 | ) | 
| 
    State taxes, net of federal benefit
 |  |  | 961 |  |  |  | 1,864 |  |  |  | 1,625 |  | 
| 
    Extraterritorial income exclusion
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,169 | ) |  |  | (55 | ) | 
| 
    Tax reserves
 |  |  | (1,673 | ) |  |  | (166 | ) |  |  | 80 |  | 
| 
    Valuation allowance
 |  |  | 1,249 |  |  |  | 41 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Tax credits
 |  |  | (2,466 | ) |  |  | (1,275 | ) |  |  | (878 | ) | 
| 
    Other
 |  |  | 1,061 |  |  |  | (619 | ) |  |  | 414 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Benefit) provision for income taxes
 |  | $ | (1,585 | ) |  | $ | 27,745 |  |  | $ | 29,138 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The (benefit) provision for income taxes for the years ended
    December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Current
 |  | $ | (10,635 | ) |  | $ | 18,328 |  |  | $ | 21,890 |  | 
| 
    Deferred
 |  |  | 9,050 |  |  |  | 9,417 |  |  |  | 7,248 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Benefit) provision for income taxes
 |  | $ | (1,585 | ) |  | $ | 27,745 |  |  | $ | 29,138 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    72
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    A summary of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of
    December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Current deferred tax assets:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable
 |  | $ | 820 |  |  | $ | 1,560 |  | 
| 
    Inventories
 |  |  | 2,937 |  |  |  | 2,950 |  | 
| 
    Warranty costs
 |  |  | 1,859 |  |  |  | 2,550 |  | 
| 
    Foreign exchange contracts
 |  |  | 524 |  |  |  | (2,947 | ) | 
| 
    Stock options
 |  |  | 1,487 |  |  |  | 1,478 |  | 
| 
    Accrued benefits
 |  |  | 4,942 |  |  |  | 1,830 |  | 
| 
    Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
 |  |  | 420 |  |  |  | 1,398 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net current deferred assets
 |  | $ | 12,989 |  |  | $ | 8,819 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization and fixed assets
 |  | $ | (33,062 | ) |  | $ | (24,212 | ) | 
| 
    Pension obligation
 |  |  | 2,076 |  |  |  | 7,629 |  | 
| 
    Net operating loss carryforwards
 |  |  | 1,903 |  |  |  | 1,548 |  | 
| 
    Foreign tax credit carryforwards
 |  |  | 6,216 |  |  |  | 3,818 |  | 
| 
    Valuation allowance
 |  |  | (1,290 | ) |  |  | (41 | ) | 
| 
    Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
 |  |  | (2,919 | ) |  |  | 647 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net noncurrent deferred tax (liabilities)
 |  | $ | (27,076 | ) |  | $ | (10,611 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately
    $2.6 million of federal and $39.0 million of state net
    operating loss carryforwards related to our
    U.S. operations. Utilization of these losses is subject to
    the tax laws of the applicable tax jurisdiction and our legal
    organizational structure, and may be limited by the ability of
    certain subsidiaries to generate taxable income in the
    associated tax jurisdiction. Our net operating loss
    carryforwards expire beginning in 2009 and continue through
    2027. The deferred income tax provision consists of the change
    in the deferred income tax assets, adjusted for the impact of
    the tax benefit on the cumulative effect of the change in
    accounting and the tax impact of certain of the other
    comprehensive income (loss) items. Deferred taxes have not been
    provided on unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries
    that arose in fiscal years ending on or before December 31,
    2007. It is not practical to determine the additional tax, if
    any, that would result from the remittance of these amounts.
 
    We operate in multiple jurisdictions and are routinely under
    audit by federal, state and international tax authorities.
    Exposures exist related to various filing positions which may
    require an extended period of time to resolve and may result in
    income tax adjustments by the taxing authorities. Reserves for
    these potential exposures have been established which represent
    managements best estimate of the probable adjustments. On
    a quarterly basis, management evaluates the reserve amounts in
    light of any additional information and adjusts the reserve
    balances as necessary to reflect the best estimate of the
    probable outcomes. Management believes that we have established
    the appropriate reserve for these estimated exposures. However,
    actual results may differ from these estimates. The resolution
    of these matters in a particular future period could have an
    impact on our consolidated statement of operations and provision
    for income taxes.
 
    We file federal income tax returns in the United States and
    income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions.
    With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to income tax
    examinations by any of the taxing authorities for years before
    2004. There are currently three income tax examinations in
    process. We do not anticipate that any adjustments from these
    examinations will result in material changes to our consolidated
    financial position and results of operations.
    
    73
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective
    January 1, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, we provided
    a liability of approximately $2.7 million of unrecognized
    tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax
    positions. Of the $2.7 million, the amount that would
    impact our effective tax rate, if recognized, is approximately
    $1.6 million. The remaining $1.1 million of
    unrecognized tax benefits consists of items that are offset by
    deferred tax assets subject to valuation allowances, and thus
    could further impact the effective tax rate.
 
    We accrue penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax
    benefits through income tax expense, which is consistent with
    the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods. We
    had approximately $0.6 million accrued for the payment of
    interest and penalties at December 31, 2007, of which
    $0.2 million was accrued during the current year. Accrued
    interest and penalties are included in the $2.7 million of
    unrecognized tax benefits.
 
    During the current year, we released approximately
    $1.9 million of tax reserves which related to tax, interest
    and penalties associated with items with expiring statues of
    limitations. We anticipate events could occur within the next
    12 months that would have an impact on the amount of
    unrecognized tax benefits that would be required. Approximately
    $0.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits relate to items
    that are affected by expiring statutes of limitation within the
    next 12 months.
 
    A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
    unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  January 1, 2007
 |  | $ | 3,944 |  | 
| 
    Gross increase  tax positions in prior periods
 |  |  | 309 |  | 
| 
    Gross decreases  tax positions in prior periods
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross increases  current period tax positions
 |  |  | 313 |  | 
| 
    Settlements
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Lapse of statute of limitations
 |  |  | (1,871 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  December 31, 2007
 |  | $ | 2,695 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
    Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
    Information, our operating components constitute a single
    operating segment due to the manner in which our key decisions
    are made as well as the manner in which our operating components
    collectively support similar markets and customers, utilize
    similar manufacturing and assembly processes and utilize the
    same centralized network of personnel.
 
    The following table presents revenues and long-lived assets for
    each of the geographic areas in which we operate (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Long-Lived 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Long-Lived 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Long-Lived 
 |  | 
|  |  | Revenues |  |  | Assets |  |  | Revenues |  |  | Assets |  |  | Revenues |  |  | Assets |  | 
|  | 
| 
    North America
 |  | $ | 538,116 |  |  | $ | 85,817 |  |  | $ | 800,069 |  |  | $ | 81,930 |  |  | $ | 636,448 |  |  | $ | 74,633 |  | 
| 
    United Kingdom
 |  |  | 132,972 |  |  |  | 5,913 |  |  |  | 106,545 |  |  |  | 5,861 |  |  |  | 105,832 |  |  |  | 4,793 |  | 
| 
    All other countries
 |  |  | 25,698 |  |  |  | 6,528 |  |  |  | 12,137 |  |  |  | 2,597 |  |  |  | 12,201 |  |  |  | 989 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 696,786 |  |  | $ | 98,258 |  |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  | $ | 90,388 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  |  | $ | 80,415 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Revenues are attributed to geographic locations based on the
    location of where the product is manufactured. Included in all
    other countries are intercompany sales eliminations.
    
    74
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    The following is a summary composition by product category of
    our revenues (dollars in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Years Ended December 31, |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  |  | Revenues |  |  | % |  |  | Revenues |  |  | % |  |  | Revenues |  |  | % |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Seats and seating systems
 |  | $ | 248,098 |  |  |  | 35 |  |  | $ | 266,401 |  |  |  | 29 |  |  | $ | 241,941 |  |  |  | 32 |  | 
| 
    Cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and structural
    components
 |  |  | 150,371 |  |  |  | 22 |  |  |  | 317,682 |  |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 252,090 |  |  |  | 33 |  | 
| 
    Electronic wire harnesses and panel assemblies
 |  |  | 130,863 |  |  |  | 19 |  |  |  | 103,417 |  |  |  | 11 |  |  |  | 54,966 |  |  |  | 7 |  | 
| 
    Trim systems and components
 |  |  | 109,869 |  |  |  | 16 |  |  |  | 158,707 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 133,591 |  |  |  | 18 |  | 
| 
    Mirrors, wipers and controls
 |  |  | 57,585 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 72,544 |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 71,893 |  |  |  | 10 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | $ | 696,786 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  | $ | 918,751 |  |  |  | 100 |  |  | $ | 754,481 |  |  |  | 100 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The significant change in the 2007 product categories is
    primarily the result of the reduction in Class 8 North
    American heavy truck volumes.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 11. | Commitments
    and Contingencies | 
 
    Leases  We lease office and manufacturing
    space and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating lease
    agreements that require us to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes
    and other expenses in addition to annual rentals. The
    anticipated future lease costs are based in part on certain
    assumptions and we will continue to monitor these costs to
    determine if the estimates need to be revised in the future.
    Lease expense was approximately $11.8 million,
    $8.7 million and $8.4 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
    respectively. Capital lease agreements entered into by us are
    immaterial in total. Future minimum annual rental commitments at
    December 31, 2007 under these operating leases are as
    follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Year Ending December 31,
 |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2008
 |  | $ | 10,227 |  | 
| 
    2009
 |  |  | 8,293 |  | 
| 
    2010
 |  |  | 7,039 |  | 
| 
    2011
 |  |  | 6,012 |  | 
| 
    2012
 |  |  | 5,450 |  | 
| 
    Thereafter
 |  |  | 23,189 |  | 
 
    Litigation  We are subject to various legal
    actions and claims incidental to our business, including those
    arising out of alleged defects, product warranties and
    employment-related, income tax and environmental matters.
    Management believes that we maintain adequate insurance to cover
    these claims. We have established reserves for issues that are
    probable and estimatable in amounts management believes are
    adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered by
    insurance. Based upon the information available to management
    and discussions with legal counsel, it is the opinion of
    management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal
    actions and claims that are incidental to our business will not
    have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial
    position, results of operations or cash flows; however, such
    matters are subject to many uncertainties and the outcomes of
    individual matters are not predictable with assurance.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 12. | Stockholders
    Investment | 
 
    Common Stock  Our authorized capital stock
    consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock with a par
    value of $0.01 per share.
    
    75
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Preferred Stock  Our authorized capital stock
    consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par
    value of $0.01 per share, with no shares outstanding as of
    December 31, 2007.
 
    Earnings Per Share  In accordance with
    SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, as amended,
    basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net income by
    the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
    the year. Diluted earnings per share, and all other diluted per
    share amounts presented, is determined by dividing net income by
    the weighted average number of common shares and potential
    common shares outstanding during the period as determined by the
    Treasury Stock Method, as amended, in SFAS No. 123(R),
    Share-Based Payment. Potential common shares are included
    in the diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive.
    Diluted earnings per share for years ended December 31,
    2007, 2006 and 2005 includes the effects of potential common
    shares consisting of common stock issuable upon exercise of
    outstanding stock options and the effect of nonvested restricted
    stock when dilutive (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net (loss) income applicable to common stockholders
     basic and diluted
 |  | $ | (3,251 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  | $ | 49,411 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
 |  |  | 21,439 |  |  |  | 21,151 |  |  |  | 19,440 |  | 
| 
    Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted
    stock grants after application of the treasury stock method
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 394 |  |  |  | 257 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Dilutive shares outstanding
 |  |  | 21,439 |  |  |  | 21,545 |  |  |  | 19,697 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic (loss) earnings per share
 |  | $ | (0.15 | ) |  | $ | 2.74 |  |  | $ | 2.54 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted (loss) earnings per share
 |  | $ | (0.15 | ) |  | $ | 2.69 |  |  | $ | 2.51 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    As of December 31, 2007, diluted loss per share excludes
    approximately 161 thousand of outstanding stock options and
    non-vested restricted stock as the effect would have been
    anti-dilutive.
 
    Dividends  We have not declared or paid any
    cash dividends in the past. The terms of our senior credit
    agreement restricts the payment or distribution of our cash or
    other assets, including cash dividend payments.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 13. | Share-Based
    Compensation | 
 
    Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted
    SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective
    application transition method. SFAS No. 123(R)
    eliminates the intrinsic value method under Accounting
    Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 as an
    alternative method of accounting for share-based compensation
    arrangements. SFAS No. 123(R) also revises the fair
    value-based method of accounting for share-based payment
    liabilities, forfeitures and modifications of share-based
    compensation arrangements and clarifies the guidance of
    SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
    Compensation, in several areas, including measuring fair
    value, classifying an award as equity or as a liability and
    attributing compensation cost to reporting periods. Prior to our
    adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), benefits of tax
    deductions in excess of recognized compensation costs were
    reported as operating cash flows. SFAS No. 123(R)
    amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, to
    require that excess tax benefits be reported as a financing cash
    inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid, which is
    included within operating cash flows.
 
    We estimate our pre-tax share-based compensation expense to be
    approximately $3.9 million in 2008 based on our current
    share-based compensation arrangements. The compensation expense
    that has been charged against income for those arrangements was
    approximately $3.1 million for the year ended
    December 31, 2007. The total income tax benefit recognized
    in our consolidated statement of operations for share-based
    compensation arrangements was approximately $1.0 million
    for the year ended December 31, 2007. Because we accounted
    for our share-based compensation arrangements under APB Opinion
    No. 25 prior to adopting SFAS No. 123(R), our net
    income for the year ended December 31, 2005 does not
    include any compensation expense related to these arrangements.
    
    76
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    For the year ended December 31, 2006, the adoption of
    SFAS No. 123(R) resulted in incremental share-based
    compensation expense of approximately $0.6 million. The
    incremental share-based compensation expense caused income
    before provision for income taxes to decrease for the year ended
    December 31, 2006 by approximately $0.6 million, and
    net income to decrease for the year by approximately
    $0.4 million. In addition, basic and diluted earnings per
    share decreased by $0.02 and $0.02, respectively, for the year
    ended December 31, 2006. Cash provided by operating
    activities decreased and cash provided by financing activities
    increased by approximately $347 thousand for the year ended
    December 31, 2006, related to excess tax benefits from
    share-based payment arrangements.
 
    The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
    earnings per share had we applied the fair value recognition
    provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) to awards granted under
    our amended and restated equity incentive plan prior to the
    adoption of this standard for the year ended December 31,
    2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts 
    unaudited):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Net income, as reported
 |  | $ | 49,411 |  | 
| 
    (Less): Share-based compensation expense determined under the
    the fair-value-based method for all awards, net of related tax
    effects
 |  |  | (390 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pro forma net income
 |  | $ | 49,021 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Basic earnings per share:
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    As reported
 |  | $ | 2.54 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pro forma
 |  | $ | 2.52 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Diluted earnings per share:
 |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    As reported
 |  | $ | 2.51 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pro forma
 |  | $ | 2.49 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Stock Option Grants and Restricted Stock
    Awards  In 1998, we granted options to purchase
    57,902 shares of common stock at $9.43 per share, which are
    exercisable through December 2008. The options were granted at
    exercise prices determined to be at or above fair value on the
    date of grant. As of December 31, 2007, 28,951 of the
    initially granted options have been exercised.
 
    In May 2004, we granted options to purchase 910,869 shares
    of common stock at $5.54 per share. These options have a
    ten-year term and the original terms provided for 50% of the
    options becoming exercisable ratably on June 30, 2005 and
    June 30, 2006. During June 2004, we modified the terms of
    these options such that they became 100% vested immediately.
 
    In October 2004, we granted options to purchase
    598,950 shares of common stock at $15.84 per share. These
    options have a ten-year term and vest ratably in three equal
    annual installments commencing on October 20, 2005. As of
    December 31, 2007, there was no amount remaining of
    unearned compensation related to nonvested stock options granted
    in October 2004 under the amended and restated equity incentive
    plan.
 
    In November 2005, 168,700 shares of restricted stock were
    awarded by our compensation committee under our Amended and
    Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock is a grant of
    shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
    disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
    terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
    period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
    restricted stock granted in November 2005 vest in three equal
    annual installments commencing on October 20, 2006. A
    participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
    rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
    determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was
    approximately $1.1 million of unearned compensation related
    to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2005 under the amended
    and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is
    
    77
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    subject to future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and
    will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
    period of 10 months.
 
    In November 2006, 207,700 shares of restricted stock were
    awarded by our compensation committee under our Amended and
    Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock is a grant of
    shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
    disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
    terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
    period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
    restricted stock granted in November 2006 vest in three equal
    annual installments commencing on October 20, 2007. A
    participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
    rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
    determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was
    approximately $2.8 million of unearned compensation related
    to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2006 under the amended
    and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is subject to
    future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be
    recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining period of
    22 months.
 
    In February 2007, 10,000 shares of restricted stock and in
    March 2007, 10,000 shares of restricted stock were awarded
    by our compensation committee under our Amended and Restated
    Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock granted in
    February 2007 and March 2007 vest ratably in three equal annual
    installments commencing on October 20, 2007. A participant
    granted restricted stock generally has all of the rights of a
    stockholder, unless the compensation committee determines
    otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was approximately
    $0.2 million of unearned compensation related to nonvested
    restricted stock awarded in 2007 under the amended and restated
    equity incentive plan. This expense is subject to future
    adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be recognized
    on a straight-line basis over the remaining period of
    22 months.
 
    In October 2007, 328,900 shares of restricted stock were
    awarded by our compensation committee under our Second Amended
    and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock is a grant
    of shares of common stock that may not be sold, encumbered or
    disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain
    terminations of employment, prior to the end of a restricted
    period set by the compensation committee. The shares of
    restricted stock granted in October 2007 vest in three equal
    annual installments commencing on October 20, 2008. A
    participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the
    rights of a stockholder, unless the compensation committee
    determines otherwise. As of December 31, 2007, there was
    approximately $4.2 million of unearned compensation related
    to nonvested restricted stock awarded in 2007 under the second
    amended and restated equity incentive plan. This expense is
    subject to future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and
    will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
    period of 34 months.
 
    We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the
    fair value of equity-based stock option grants with the
    following weighted-average assumptions:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2004 
 |  | 
|  |  | Stock 
 |  | 
|  |  | Option 
 |  | 
|  |  | Grants |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Weighted-average fair value of option and restricted stock grants
 |  | $ | 3.34 |  | 
| 
    Risk-free interest rate
 |  |  | 4.50 | % | 
| 
    Expected volatility
 |  |  | 23.12 | % | 
| 
    Expected life in months
 |  |  | 36 |  | 
 
    We currently estimate the forfeiture rate for our October 2004
    stock option grants, November 2005 restricted stock awards,
    November 2006, February/March and October 2007 restricted stock
    awards at 13.9%, 15.0%, 13.3%, 0.0% and 10.0%, respectively, for
    all participants of each plan.
    
    78
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    A summary of the status of our stock options as of
    December 31, 2007 and changes during the twelve-month
    period ending December 31, 2007 is presented below:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted- 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted- 
 |  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  | Remaining 
 |  |  | Aggregate 
 |  | 
|  |  | Options 
 |  |  | Exercise 
 |  |  | Contractual 
 |  |  | Intrinsic 
 |  | 
| 
    Stock Options
 |  | (000s) |  |  | Price |  |  | Life (Years) |  |  | Value (000s) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Outstanding at December 31, 2006
 |  |  | 848 |  |  | $ | 11.94 |  |  |  | 7.5 |  |  | $ | 8,588 |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercised
 |  |  | (69 | ) |  |  | 6.74 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Forfeited
 |  |  | (29 | ) |  |  | 10.90 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Outstanding at December 31, 2007
 |  |  | 750 |  |  | $ | 12.45 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  |  | $ | 2,013 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exercisable at December 31, 2007
 |  |  | 750 |  |  | $ | 12.45 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  |  | $ | 2,013 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Nonvested, expected to vest at December 31, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ | 15.84 |  |  |  | 6.5 |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The following table summarizes information about the nonvested
    stock options and restricted stock grants as of
    December 31, 2007:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Nonvested Stock Options |  |  | Nonvested Restricted Stock |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted- 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Weighted- 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Average 
 |  | 
|  |  | Options 
 |  |  | Grant-Date 
 |  |  | Shares 
 |  |  | Grant-Date 
 |  | 
|  |  | (000s) |  |  | Fair Value |  |  | (000s) |  |  | Fair Value |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Nonvested at December 31, 2006
 |  |  | 175 |  |  | $ | 3.34 |  |  |  | 309 |  |  | $ | 20.21 |  | 
| 
    Granted
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 349 |  |  |  | 13.78 |  | 
| 
    Vested
 |  |  | (167 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (121 | ) |  |  | 20.11 |  | 
| 
    Forfeited
 |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17 | ) |  |  | 19.94 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Nonvested at December 31, 2007
 |  |  |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  |  | 520 |  |  | $ | 16.94 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    We expect employees to surrender approximately 22 thousand
    shares of our common stock in connection with the vesting of
    restricted stock during 2008 to satisfy income tax withholding
    obligations.
 
    As of December 31, 2007, a total of 798,598 shares
    were available from the 2.0 million shares authorized for
    award under our Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive
    Plan, including cumulative forfeitures.
 
    Repurchase of Common Stock  During 2007, we
    did not repurchase any shares of common stock.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 14. | Defined
    Contribution Plans, Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
    Plans | 
 
    Defined Contribution Plans  We sponsor various
    401(k) employee savings plans covering all eligible employees,
    as defined. Eligible employees can contribute on a pre-tax basis
    to the plan. In accordance with the terms of the 401(k) plans,
    we elect to match a certain percentage of the participants
    contributions to the plans, as defined. We recognized expense
    associated with these plans of approximately $1.7 million,
    $1.5 million and $1.2 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005,
    respectively.
 
    Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
    Plans  We sponsor pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans that cover certain hourly and
    salaried employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Our
    policy is to make annual contributions to the plans to fund the
    normal cost as required by local regulations. In addition, we
    have a post-retirement benefit plan for certain
    U.S. operations, retirees and their dependents.
    
    79
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
    Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
    Other Postretirement Plans  an amendment of FASB
    Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).
    SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the
    funded status of defined benefit pension and other
    post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or liability in our
    consolidated balance sheet and to recognize changes in that
    funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
    accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders
    investment. SFAS No. 158 also requires that, beginning
    in 2008, our assumptions used to measure our annual defined
    benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans be
    determined as of the balance sheet date, and all plan assets and
    liabilities be reported as of that date. Currently, the
    assumptions used to measure our annual defined benefit pension
    and other post-retirement benefit plan expenses are determined
    as of October 1 or December 31 (measurement dates) for our
    various plans, and all plan assets and liabilities are generally
    reported as of those dates. In accordance with the provisions of
    SFAS No. 158, prior year amounts have not been
    adjusted.
 
    The change in benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
    as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
    consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Change in benefit obligation:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefit obligation  Beginning of year
 |  | $ | 30,622 |  |  | $ | 30,664 |  |  | $ | 47,067 |  |  | $ | 39,850 |  |  | $ | 2,447 |  |  | $ | 4,398 |  | 
| 
    Service cost
 |  |  | 420 |  |  |  | 628 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  | 61 |  | 
| 
    Interest cost
 |  |  | 1,739 |  |  |  | 1,684 |  |  |  | 2,301 |  |  |  | 2,253 |  |  |  | 139 |  |  |  | 164 |  | 
| 
    Plan participants contributions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 174 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Plan amendments
 |  |  | 211 |  |  |  | 59 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 414 |  |  |  | 206 |  | 
| 
    Curtailment (gain)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,193 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (776 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,057 | ) | 
| 
    Benefits paid
 |  |  | (1,008 | ) |  |  | (1,001 | ) |  |  | (3,365 | ) |  |  | (1,360 | ) |  |  | (336 | ) |  |  | (184 | ) | 
| 
    Actuarial (gain) loss
 |  |  | (982 | ) |  |  | 781 |  |  |  | 459 |  |  |  | 1,189 |  |  |  | 93 |  |  |  | (141 | ) | 
| 
    Exchange rate changes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 614 |  |  |  | 5,474 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefit obligation at end of year
 |  |  | 31,002 |  |  |  | 30,622 |  |  |  | 47,076 |  |  |  | 47,067 |  |  |  | 2,774 |  |  |  | 2,447 |  | 
| 
    Change in plan assets:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fair value of plan assets  Beginning of year
 |  |  | 20,588 |  |  |  | 19,722 |  |  |  | 37,013 |  |  |  | 29,844 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Actual return on plan assets
 |  |  | 4,476 |  |  |  | 1,061 |  |  |  | 570 |  |  |  | 3,278 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Acquisitions/divestitures
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Employer contributions
 |  |  | 2,200 |  |  |  | 806 |  |  |  | 947 |  |  |  | 1,033 |  |  |  | 422 |  |  |  | 240 |  | 
| 
    Plan participants contributions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 174 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Benefits paid
 |  |  | (1,008 | ) |  |  | (1,001 | ) |  |  | (3,365 | ) |  |  | (1,360 | ) |  |  | (336 | ) |  |  | (184 | ) | 
| 
    Risk benefit insurance premium
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (55 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exchange rate changes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 484 |  |  |  | 4,099 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Fair value of plan assets at end of year
 |  |  | 26,256 |  |  |  | 20,588 |  |  |  | 35,649 |  |  |  | 37,013 |  |  |  | 86 |  |  |  | 56 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Funded status
 |  | $ | (4,746 | ) |  | $ | (10,034 | ) |  | $ | (11,427 | ) |  | $ | (10,054 | ) |  | $ | (2,688 | ) |  | $ | (2,391 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    80
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at
    December 31 consist of (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Current liabilities
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 527 |  |  | $ | 292 |  | 
| 
    Noncurrent liabilities
 |  |  | 4,746 |  |  |  | 10,034 |  |  |  | 11,427 |  |  |  | 10,054 |  |  |  | 2,161 |  |  |  | 2,099 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net amount recognized
 |  | $ | 4,746 |  |  | $ | 10,034 |  |  | $ | 11,427 |  |  | $ | 10,054 |  |  | $ | 2,688 |  |  | $ | 2,391 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income  
    Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at
    December 31 consist of (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Actuarial loss (gain), net of tax
 |  | $ | 1,654 |  |  | $ | (823 | ) |  | $ | (7,133 | ) |  | $ | (6,008 | ) |  | $ | 73 |  |  | $ | 129 |  | 
 
    Defined benefits plans with a projected benefit obligation and
    accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at
    December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Projected benefit obligation
 |  | $ | 31,002 |  |  | $ | 30,622 |  |  | $ | 47,076 |  |  | $ | 47,067 |  | 
| 
    Accumulated benefit obligation
 |  | $ | 31,002 |  |  | $ | 30,622 |  |  | $ | 47,076 |  |  | $ | 47,067 |  | 
| 
    Fair value of plan assets
 |  | $ | 26,256 |  |  | $ | 20,588 |  |  | $ | 35,649 |  |  | $ | 37,013 |  | 
 
    The components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
    December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Service cost
 |  | $ | 420 |  |  | $ | 628 |  |  | $ | 952 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 263 |  |  | $ | 991 |  |  | $ | 17 |  |  | $ | 61 |  |  | $ | 233 |  | 
| 
    Interest cost
 |  |  | 1,739 |  |  |  | 1,684 |  |  |  | 1,439 |  |  |  | 2,301 |  |  |  | 2,253 |  |  |  | 1,862 |  |  |  | 139 |  |  |  | 164 |  |  |  | 362 |  | 
| 
    Expected return on plan assets
 |  |  | (1,539 | ) |  |  | (1,649 | ) |  |  | (1,419 | ) |  |  | (2,178 | ) |  |  | (2,030 | ) |  |  | (1,931 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization of prior service costs
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  | 17 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Recognized actuarial loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 191 |  |  |  | 263 |  |  |  | 334 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net periodic benefit cost
 |  |  | 620 |  |  |  | 663 |  |  |  | 972 |  |  |  | 314 |  |  |  | 755 |  |  |  | 1,273 |  |  |  | 156 |  |  |  | 225 |  |  |  | 597 |  | 
| 
    Curtailment (gain) loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,949 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 151 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,057 | ) |  |  | (3,097 | ) | 
| 
    Special Termination Benefits
 |  |  | 211 |  |  |  | 59 |  |  |  | 61 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 414 |  |  |  | 207 |  |  |  | (447 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net benefit cost (gain)
 |  | $ | 831 |  |  | $ | (1,227 | ) |  | $ | 1,033 |  |  | $ | 314 |  |  | $ | 906 |  |  | $ | 1,273 |  |  | $ | 570 |  |  | $ | (1,625 | ) |  | $ | (2,947 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    81
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
    Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income  
    Amounts recognized as other changes in plan assets and benefit
    obligations in other comprehensive income at December 31 are as
    follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other
    Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Actuarial (gain) loss
 |  | $ | (3,919 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,066 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 93 |  |  | $ |  |  | 
| 
    Amortization of actuarial (gain)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (191 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total recognized in other comprehensive income
 |  | $ | (3,919 | ) |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1,875 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 93 |  |  | $ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    The estimated actuarial loss for the defined benefit pension
    plans that will be amortized from accumulated other
    comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the
    next fiscal year are $0.3 million. The estimated actuarial
    gain for the other post-retirement benefit plans that will be
    amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net
    periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $22 thousand.
 
    Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
    obligations at December 31 are as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Discount rate
 |  |  | 6.00 | % |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 5.90 | % |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 6.00 | % |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 5.50-5.75 | % | 
| 
    Rate of compensation increase
 |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 3.50 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 3.30 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  | 
 
    Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
    benefit cost at December 31 are as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other Post-Retirement 
 |  | 
|  |  | U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Non-U.S. Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Discount rate
 |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 5.66 | % |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 5.00 | % |  |  | 5.50 | % |  |  | 5.75 | % |  |  | 5.50-5.75 | % |  |  | 5.66-5.75 | % | 
| 
    Expected return on plan assets
 |  |  | 7.50 | % |  |  | 8.50 | % |  |  | 8.50 | % |  |  | 6.00 | % |  |  | 6.00 | % |  |  | 7.50 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  | 
| 
    Rate of compensation increase
 |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 3.50 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | 3.30 | % |  |  | 3.20 | % |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  | N/A |  | 
 
    We employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of
    equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the
    long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. The
    intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by
    outperforming plan liabilities over the long run. Risk tolerance
    is established through careful consideration of plan
    liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial
    condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend
    of equity and fixed income investments. Furthermore, equity
    investments are diversified across U.S. and
    non-U.S. stocks
    as well as growth, value and small and large capitalizations.
    Other assets such as real estate, private equity and hedge funds
    are used judiciously to enhance long-term returns while
    improving portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to
    gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however,
    derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the
    market value of the underlying investments. Investment risk is
    measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual
    liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies and
    quarterly investment portfolio reviews. We expect to contribute
    $2.7 million to our pension plans and $0.5 million to
    our other post-retirement benefit plans in 2008.
    
    82
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    Our current investment allocation target for our pension plans
    for 2008 and our weighted-average asset allocations of our
    pension assets for the years ended December 31, by asset
    category, are as follows:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Target Allocation |  |  | Pension Plans |  | 
|  |  | U.S. |  |  | Non-U.S. |  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Equity securities
 |  |  | 52 | % |  |  | 60 | % |  |  | 54 | % |  |  | 58 | % | 
| 
    Debt securities
 |  |  | 33 |  |  |  | 30 |  |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 24 |  | 
| 
    Real estate
 |  |  | 15 |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 18 |  |  |  | 14 |  | 
| 
    Other
 |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 4 |  |  |  | 4 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % |  |  | 100 | % | 
 
    For measurement purposes, a 10.0% annual rate of increase in the
    per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for
    2007. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5% through
    2013 and remain constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost
    trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts
    reported for other post-retirement benefit plans.
 
    Differences in the ultimate health care cost trend rates within
    the range indicated below would have had the following impact on
    2007 other post-retirement benefit results (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  |  | 1 Percentage 
 |  | 
|  |  | Point Increase |  |  | Point Decrease |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Increase (Decrease) from change in health care cost trend rates
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other post-retirement benefit expense
 |  | $ | 31 |  |  | $ | (38 | ) | 
| 
    Other post-retirement benefit liability
 |  | $ | 105 |  |  | $ | (98 | ) | 
 
    The following table summarizes our expected future benefit
    payments of our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans
    (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Other Post- 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Retirement 
 |  | 
| 
    Year
 |  | Pension Plans |  |  | Benefit Plans |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2008
 |  | $ | 2,159 |  |  | $ | 527 |  | 
| 
    2009
 |  | $ | 2,429 |  |  | $ | 463 |  | 
| 
    2010
 |  | $ | 2,641 |  |  | $ | 433 |  | 
| 
    2011
 |  | $ | 2,938 |  |  | $ | 410 |  | 
| 
    2012
 |  | $ | 3,313 |  |  | $ | 297 |  | 
| 
    2013 to 2017
 |  | $ | 21,412 |  |  | $ | 591 |  | 
 
    During 2005, we elected to freeze the pension plan for Mayflower
    salaried employees. This action was undertaken by us in an
    effort to minimize future liabilities and as part of the
    integration process.
 
    During 2005, we also elected to terminate the Mayflower medical
    and dental post-retirement plan. This action was undertaken by
    us in an effort to minimize future liabilities and as part of
    the integration process. As a result of this action, we recorded
    a curtailment gain of approximately $3.1 million which is
    included in the consolidated financial statements of operations
    for the year ending December 31, 2005.
 
    During 2006, we elected to freeze our salaried pension and other
    post-retirement benefits plans at our United States and United
    Kingdom based operations. This action was undertaken by us in an
    effort to minimize future liabilities.
    
    83
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    |  |  | 
    | 15. | Related
    Party Transactions | 
 
    We entered into the following related party transactions during
    the three years ended December 31, 2007:
 
    On January 31, 2005, we entered into an advisory agreement
    with Hidden Creek Partners, LLC (HCP), (formerly
    Hidden Creek Industries (HCI)), pursuant to which
    HCP agreed to assist us in financing activities, strategic
    initiatives and acquisitions in exchange for an annual fee. In
    addition, the Company agreed to pay HCP a transaction fee for
    services rendered that relate to transactions we may enter into
    from time to time, in an amount that is negotiated between our
    Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer and approved
    by our Board of Directors. All of the principals of HCP are
    employees and managing directors of Thayer Capital Partners
    (Thayer). Scott D. Rued, our Chairman, is a managing
    partner of Thayer and Richard A. Snell, a member of our Board of
    Directors and our Compensation Committee Chairman, is an
    operating partner of Thayer. Thayer Capital, Scott D. Rued and
    Richard A. Snell are neither a party to, nor have any direct or
    indirect financial interest in the advisory agreement between us
    and HCP. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
    2005, we made payments under these arrangements of approximately
    $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $1.8 million,
    respectively. This agreement has not been renewed for 2008.
 
    On May 1, 2004, we entered into a Product Sourcing
    Assistance Agreement with Baird Asia Limited (BAL),
    an affiliate of Baird Capital Partners III L.P. Pursuant to
    the agreement, BAL assisted us in procuring materials and parts
    from Asia, including the countries of China, Malaysia, Hong Kong
    and Taiwan. BAL received as compensation a percentage of the
    price of the materials and parts supplied to us, of at least 2%
    of the price but not exceeding 10% of the price, to be
    determined on a
    case-by-case
    basis. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we incurred
    expenses of approximately $3.1 million for the value of
    goods and services purchased under this agreement. In connection
    with the sale of stock during 2005, BAL was no longer a related
    party as of and subsequent to December 31, 2005.
 
    |  |  | 
    | 16. | Consolidating
    Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information | 
 
    The following consolidating financial information presents
    balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flow
    information related to our business. Each guarantor, as defined,
    is a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary and has fully
    and unconditionally guaranteed the subordinated notes issued by
    us, on a joint and several basis. Separate financial statements
    and other disclosures concerning the guarantors have not been
    presented because management believes that such information is
    not material to investors.
 
    The parent company includes all of the wholly-owned subsidiaries
    accounted for under the equity method. The guarantor and
    non-guarantor companies include the consolidated financial
    results of their wholly-owned subsidiaries accounted for under
    the equity method. All applicable corporate expenses have been
    allocated appropriately among the guarantor and non-guarantor
    subsidiaries.
    
    84
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
    As of December 31, 2007
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    CURRENT ASSETS:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1,349 |  |  | $ | 8,518 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 9,867 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 242,842 |  |  |  | 34,824 |  |  |  | (169,979 | ) |  |  | 107,687 |  | 
| 
    Inventories, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58,757 |  |  |  | 38,238 |  |  |  | (610 | ) |  |  | 96,385 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,175 |  |  |  | 7,914 |  |  |  | 5,419 |  |  |  | 16,508 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15,223 |  |  |  | 624 |  |  |  | (2,858 | ) |  |  | 12,989 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 321,346 |  |  |  | 90,118 |  |  |  | (168,028 | ) |  |  | 243,436 |  | 
| 
    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85,817 |  |  |  | 12,441 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 98,258 |  | 
| 
    INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
 |  |  | 417,428 |  |  |  | (100,082 | ) |  |  | 45,502 |  |  |  | (362,848 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    GOODWILL
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 113,787 |  |  |  | 37,402 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 151,189 |  | 
| 
    INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83,800 |  |  |  | 13,775 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 97,575 |  | 
| 
    OTHER ASSETS, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,631 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,631 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,172 |  |  |  | 3,323 |  |  |  | (7,495 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL ASSETS
 |  | $ | 417,428 |  |  | $ | 517,471 |  |  | $ | 202,561 |  |  | $ | (538,371 | ) |  | $ | 599,089 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT | 
| 
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current maturities of long-term debt
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 116 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 116 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 220,923 |  |  |  | 42,089 |  |  |  | (169,979 | ) |  |  | 93,033 |  | 
| 
    Accrued liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21,128 |  |  |  | 9,426 |  |  |  | 2,561 |  |  |  | 33,115 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 242,167 |  |  |  | 51,515 |  |  |  | (167,418 | ) |  |  | 126,264 |  | 
| 
    LONG-TERM DEBT, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 159,581 |  |  |  | 25,744 |  |  |  | (25,716 | ) |  |  | 159,609 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35,387 |  |  |  | (816 | ) |  |  | (7,495 | ) |  |  | 27,076 |  | 
| 
    OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,614 |  |  |  | 13,191 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20,805 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 444,749 |  |  |  | 89,634 |  |  |  | (200,629 | ) |  |  | 333,754 |  | 
| 
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 |  |  | 417,428 |  |  |  | 72,722 |  |  |  | 112,927 |  |  |  | (337,742 | ) |  |  | 265,335 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 |  | $ | 417,428 |  |  | $ | 517,471 |  |  | $ | 202,561 |  |  | $ | (538,371 | ) |  | $ | 599,089 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    85
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 526,588 |  |  | $ | 182,737 |  |  | $ | (12,539 | ) |  | $ | 696,786 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 475,273 |  |  |  | 156,065 |  |  |  | (11,193 | ) |  |  | 620,145 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51,315 |  |  |  | 26,672 |  |  |  | (1,346 | ) |  |  | 76,641 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40,885 |  |  |  | 15,567 |  |  |  | (959 | ) |  |  | 55,493 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 412 |  |  |  | 482 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 894 |  | 
| 
    RESTRUCTURING COSTS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,433 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,433 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,585 |  |  |  | 10,623 |  |  |  | (387 | ) |  |  | 18,821 |  | 
| 
    OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (573 | ) |  |  | 9,934 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,361 |  | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,212 |  |  |  | (65 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,147 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 125 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 149 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Loss) Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (5,078 | ) |  |  | 629 |  |  |  | (387 | ) |  |  | (4,836 | ) | 
| 
    BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (207 | ) |  |  | (1,378 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,585 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (LOSS) INCOME
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (4,871 | ) |  | $ | 2,007 |  |  | $ | (387 | ) |  | $ | (3,251 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    86
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net (loss) income
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | (4,871 | ) |  | $ | 2,007 |  |  | $ | (387 | ) |  | $ | (3,251 | ) | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
    operating activities:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13,191 |  |  |  | 3,234 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,425 |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 839 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 859 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  |  |  | 125 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 149 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,084 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3,084 |  | 
| 
    Loss on sale of assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) |  |  | (8 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (10 | ) | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13,482 |  |  |  | (3,791 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,691 |  | 
| 
    Noncash loss on forward exchange contracts
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,967 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,967 |  | 
| 
    Change in other operating items
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,800 |  |  |  | 7,474 |  |  |  | 387 |  |  |  | 10,661 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by operating activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28,547 |  |  |  | 19,028 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47,575 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (13,882 | ) |  |  | (3,099 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (16,981 | ) | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of property, plant and equipment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 382 |  |  |  | 167 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 549 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of other assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition and acquisitions payments, net of cash received
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (12,281 | ) |  |  | (23,768 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (36,049 | ) | 
| 
    Other asset and liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26,651 | ) |  |  | 124 |  |  |  | 25,716 |  |  |  | (811 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (52,432 | ) |  |  | (26,576 | ) |  |  | 25,716 |  |  |  | (53,292 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
    plans
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 464 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 464 |  | 
| 
    Purchases of treasury stock from employees
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (299 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (299 | ) | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plans
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (170 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (170 | ) | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit facility
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (120,500 | ) |  |  | (8,990 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (129,490 | ) | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit facility
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 130,000 |  |  |  | 33,237 |  |  |  | (25,716 | ) |  |  | 137,521 |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (10,295 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (10,295 | ) | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease obligations
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (116 | ) |  |  | (9 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (125 | ) | 
| 
    Other, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,379 |  |  |  | 13,943 |  |  |  | (25,716 | ) |  |  | (2,394 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
    EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,413 | ) |  |  | 570 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,843 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (16,919 | ) |  |  | 6,965 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9,954 | ) | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18,268 |  |  |  | 1,553 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19,821 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 1,349 |  |  | $ | 8,518 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 9,867 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    87
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
    As of December 31, 2006
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    ASSETS
 | 
| 
    CURRENT ASSETS:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Cash and cash equivalents
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 18,268 |  |  | $ | 1,553 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 19,821 |  | 
| 
    Accounts receivable, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 148,244 |  |  |  | 31,356 |  |  |  | (56,129 | ) |  |  | 123,471 |  | 
| 
    Inventories, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66,337 |  |  |  | 22,610 |  |  |  | (224 | ) |  |  | 88,723 |  | 
| 
    Prepaid expenses
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,984 |  |  |  | 5,819 |  |  |  | 11,469 |  |  |  | 24,272 |  | 
| 
    Deferred income taxes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11,570 |  |  |  | (2,751 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,819 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 251,403 |  |  |  | 58,587 |  |  |  | (44,884 | ) |  |  | 265,106 |  | 
| 
    PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81,930 |  |  |  | 8,458 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90,388 |  | 
| 
    INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
 |  |  | 400,817 |  |  |  | 10,602 |  |  |  | 11,987 |  |  |  | (423,406 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    GOODWILL
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 104,033 |  |  |  | 30,733 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 134,766 |  | 
| 
    INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84,188 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84,188 |  | 
| 
    OTHER ASSETS, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,761 |  |  |  | 8,613 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16,374 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8,624 |  |  |  | 3,323 |  |  |  | (11,947 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL ASSETS
 |  | $ | 400,817 |  |  | $ | 548,541 |  |  | $ | 121,701 |  |  | $ | (480,237 | ) |  | $ | 590,822 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT | 
| 
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Current maturities of long-term debt
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,158 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 2,158 |  | 
| 
    Accounts payable
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 123,398 |  |  |  | 19,341 |  |  |  | (56,129 | ) |  |  | 86,610 |  | 
| 
    Accrued liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,661 |  |  |  | 3,840 |  |  |  | 11,469 |  |  |  | 40,970 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total current liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 151,217 |  |  |  | 23,181 |  |  |  | (44,660 | ) |  |  | 129,738 |  | 
| 
    LONG-TERM DEBT, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 148,156 |  |  |  | 11,800 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 159,956 |  | 
| 
    DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23,374 |  |  |  | (816 | ) |  |  | (11,947 | ) |  |  | 10,611 |  | 
| 
    OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15,556 |  |  |  | 10,056 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,612 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 338,303 |  |  |  | 44,221 |  |  |  | (56,607 | ) |  |  | 325,917 |  | 
| 
    STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 |  |  | 400,817 |  |  |  | 210,238 |  |  |  | 77,480 |  |  |  | (423,630 | ) |  |  | 264,905 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
 |  | $ | 400,817 |  |  | $ | 548,541 |  |  | $ | 121,701 |  |  | $ | (480,237 | ) |  | $ | 590,822 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    88
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (In thousands) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 789,952 |  |  | $ | 134,978 |  |  | $ | (6,179 | ) |  | $ | 918,751 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 661,519 |  |  |  | 112,738 |  |  |  | (5,344 | ) |  |  | 768,913 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 128,433 |  |  |  | 22,240 |  |  |  | (835 | ) |  |  | 149,838 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39,487 |  |  |  | 13,153 |  |  |  | (690 | ) |  |  | 51,950 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 414 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 414 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88,532 |  |  |  | 9,087 |  |  |  | (145 | ) |  |  | 97,474 |  | 
| 
    OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 755 |  |  |  | (4,223 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,468 | ) | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,963 |  |  |  | (134 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,829 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 282 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 318 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72,532 |  |  |  | 13,408 |  |  |  | (145 | ) |  |  | 85,795 |  | 
| 
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24,002 |  |  |  | 3,743 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27,745 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCOME
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 48,530 |  |  | $ | 9,665 |  |  | $ | (145 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    89
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 48,530 |  |  | $ | 9,665 |  |  | $ | (145 | ) |  | $ | 58,050 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
    operating activities:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,906 |  |  |  | 2,077 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14,983 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 855 |  |  |  | 40 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 895 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 282 |  |  |  | 36 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 318 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,006 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on sale of assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (693 | ) |  |  | 28 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (665 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Pension and post-retirement curtailment (gain) loss
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,007 | ) |  |  | 142 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,865 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,616 |  |  |  | 1,801 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9,417 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Noncash gain on forward exchange contracts
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,203 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,203 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Change in other operating items
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (37,477 | ) |  |  | (2,682 | ) |  |  | 145 |  |  |  | (40,014 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by operating activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30,018 |  |  |  | 6,904 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36,922 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17,070 | ) |  |  | (2,257 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (19,327 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of property, plant and equipment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 332 |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 352 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from disposal/sale of other assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,032 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,032 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Post-acquisition and acquisitions payments, net of cash received
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (634 | ) |  |  | (8,818 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (9,452 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other asset and liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (11,080 | ) |  |  | (10,273 | ) |  |  | 20,123 |  |  |  | (1,230 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26,420 | ) |  |  | (21,328 | ) |  |  | 20,123 |  |  |  | (27,625 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
    plans
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,140 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,140 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of treasury stock from employees
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (115 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plans
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 645 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit facility
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (61,300 | ) |  |  | (13,411 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (74,711 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit facility
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61,300 |  |  |  | 11,098 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72,398 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26,590 | ) |  |  | (1,620 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (28,210 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Long-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease obligations
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (98 | ) |  |  | (1 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (99 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Other, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20,123 |  |  |  | (20,123 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (24,018 | ) |  |  | 16,189 |  |  |  | (20,123 | ) |  |  | (27,952 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
    EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (465 | ) |  |  | (1,700 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2,165 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (20,885 | ) |  |  | 65 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (20,820 | ) |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39,153 |  |  |  | 1,488 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40,641 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 18,268 |  |  | $ | 1,553 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 19,821 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    REVENUES
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 633,725 |  |  | $ | 124,751 |  |  | $ | (3,995 | ) |  | $ | 754,481 |  | 
| 
    COST OF REVENUES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 520,209 |  |  |  | 103,366 |  |  |  | (3,544 | ) |  |  | 620,031 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Gross Profit
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 113,516 |  |  |  | 21,385 |  |  |  | (451 | ) |  |  | 134,450 |  | 
| 
    SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32,909 |  |  |  | 12,027 |  |  |  | (372 | ) |  |  | 44,564 |  | 
| 
    AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 358 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 358 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Operating Income
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80,249 |  |  |  | 9,358 |  |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | 89,528 |  | 
| 
    OTHER INCOME
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (6 | ) |  |  | (3,735 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,741 | ) | 
| 
    INTEREST EXPENSE
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11,742 |  |  |  | 1,453 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13,195 |  | 
| 
    LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,525 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,525 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66,988 |  |  |  | 11,640 |  |  |  | (79 | ) |  |  | 78,549 |  | 
| 
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,199 |  |  |  | 3,939 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29,138 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCOME
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 41,789 |  |  | $ | 7,701 |  |  | $ | (79 | ) |  | $ | 49,411 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    91
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    CONDENSED
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
    For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Parent 
 |  |  | Guarantor 
 |  |  | Non-Guarantor 
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | Company |  |  | Companies |  |  | Companies |  |  | Elimination |  |  | Consolidated |  | 
|  |  | (In thousands) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net income (loss)
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 41,789 |  |  | $ | 7,701 |  |  | $ | (79 | ) |  | $ | 49,411 |  | 
| 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
    operating activities:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Depreciation and amortization
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10,300 |  |  |  | 1,764 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12,064 |  | 
| 
    Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 750 |  |  |  | 98 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 848 |  | 
| 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,354 |  |  |  | 171 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,525 |  | 
| 
    Share-based compensation expense
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    (Gain) loss on sale of assets
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (14 | ) |  |  | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (7 | ) | 
| 
    Pension and post-retirement curtailment (gain)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,097 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,097 | ) | 
| 
    Deferred income tax provision
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5,134 |  |  |  | 2,114 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7,248 |  | 
| 
    Noncash gain on forward exchange contracts
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,793 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (3,793 | ) | 
| 
    Change in other operating items
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6,236 |  |  |  | (26,358 | ) |  |  | 79 |  |  |  | (20,043 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62,452 |  |  |  | (18,296 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44,156 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (13,892 | ) |  |  | (2,065 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (15,957 | ) | 
| 
    Post-acquisition and acquisitions payments, net of cash received
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (171,076 | ) |  |  | 225 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (170,851 | ) | 
| 
    Other asset and liabilities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,761 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1,761 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash used in investing activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (186,729 | ) |  |  | (1,840 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (188,569 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,914 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,914 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive
    plans
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,887 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,887 |  | 
| 
    Repayment of revolving credit facility
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (187,068 | ) |  |  | (20,381 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (207,449 | ) | 
| 
    Borrowings under revolving credit facility
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 187,068 |  |  |  | 19,710 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 206,778 |  | 
| 
    Repayments of long-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (237,008 | ) |  |  | (1,328 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | (238,336 | ) | 
| 
    Long-term borrowings
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 227,459 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 227,459 |  | 
| 
    Proceeds from issuance of 8% senior notes
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150,000 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 150,000 |  | 
| 
    Payments on capital lease obligations
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (46 | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (46 | ) | 
| 
    Other, net
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (17,714 | ) |  |  | 22,054 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4,340 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Net cash provided by financing activities
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 168,492 |  |  |  | 20,055 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 188,547 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
    EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (5,456 | ) |  |  | 567 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (4,889 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38,759 |  |  |  | 486 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39,245 |  | 
| 
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Beginning of period
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 394 |  |  |  | 1,002 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1,396 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    End of period
 |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 39,153 |  |  | $ | 1,488 |  |  | $ |  |  |  | $ | 40,641 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
    
    92
 
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    NOTES TO
    CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
    STATEMENTS  (Continued)
 
    |  |  | 
    | 17. | Quarterly
    Financial Data (Unaudited): | 
 
    The following is a condensed summary of actual quarterly results
    of operations for 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per share
    amounts):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Operating 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Basic Earnings 
 |  |  | Diluted Earnings 
 |  | 
|  |  | Revenues |  |  | Gross Profit |  |  | Income |  |  | Net Income |  |  | per Share |  |  | per Share(1) |  | 
|  | 
| 
    2007:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    First
 |  | $ | 198,801 |  |  | $ | 26,269 |  |  | $ | 10,612 |  |  | $ | 2,959 |  |  | $ | 0.14 |  |  | $ | 0.14 |  | 
| 
    Second
 |  | $ | 158,566 |  |  | $ | 16,619 |  |  | $ | 752 |  |  | $ | (231 | ) |  | $ | (0.01 | ) |  | $ | (0.01 | ) | 
| 
    Third
 |  | $ | 160,918 |  |  | $ | 17,819 |  |  | $ | 2,803 |  |  | $ | (2,682 | ) |  | $ | (0.13 | ) |  | $ | (0.13 | ) | 
| 
    Fourth
 |  | $ | 178,501 |  |  | $ | 15,934 |  |  | $ | 4,654 |  |  | $ | (3,297 | ) |  | $ | (0.15 | ) |  | $ | (0.15 | ) | 
| 
    2006:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    First
 |  | $ | 229,345 |  |  | $ | 38,734 |  |  | $ | 25,477 |  |  | $ | 13,408 |  |  | $ | 0.64 |  |  | $ | 0.62 |  | 
| 
    Second
 |  | $ | 234,787 |  |  | $ | 40,197 |  |  | $ | 26,847 |  |  | $ | 15,494 |  |  | $ | 0.73 |  |  | $ | 0.72 |  | 
| 
    Third
 |  | $ | 235,841 |  |  | $ | 40,797 |  |  | $ | 27,399 |  |  | $ | 18,006 |  |  | $ | 0.85 |  |  | $ | 0.84 |  | 
| 
    Fourth
 |  | $ | 218,778 |  |  | $ | 30,110 |  |  | $ | 17,751 |  |  | $ | 11,142 |  |  | $ | 0.52 |  |  | $ | 0.51 |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (1) |  | See Note 13 for discussion on the computation of diluted
    shares outstanding. | 
 
    The sum of the per share amounts for the quarters does not equal
    the total for the year due to the application of the treasury
    stock methods.
 
 
    On March 11, 2008, we finalized the sale of our facility in
    Seattle, Washington which was primarily used for manufacturing
    operations. The closure of this facility was previously
    announced on May 22, 2007.
    
    93
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 9. | Changes
    in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
    Financial Disclosure | 
 
    There were no changes in or disagreements with our independent
    accountants on matters of accounting and financial disclosures.
 
    Item 9A.  Controls
    and Procedures
 
 
    Evaluation
    of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
    Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and
    procedures (as defined in
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e)
    under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2007, our chief
    executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded
    that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
    ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
    reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
    recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
    periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and were
    effective.
    
    94
 
    Managements
    Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
    Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
    adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
    control over financial reporting is defined in
    Rules 13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f)
    promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or
    under the supervision of our principal executive and principal
    financial officers and effected by our board of directors,
    management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
    United States. Such internal control includes those policies and
    procedures that:
 
    |  |  |  | 
    |  |  | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
    accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
    of the assets; | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
    necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
    that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
    only in accordance with authorizations of management and
    directors; and | 
|  | 
    |  |  | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
    detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
    assets that could have a material effect on the financial
    statements. | 
 
    Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
    control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.
    In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in
    Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued
    by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
    Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has
    determined that, as of December 31, 2007, our internal
    control over financial reporting is effective based on those
    criteria.
 
    Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
    internal control over financial reporting as of
    December 31, 2007 has been audited by Deloitte and Touche
    LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
    in their report which appears in this Annual Report on
    Form 10-K.
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
| /s/  Mervin
    Dunn Mervin
    Dunn
 Chief Executive Officer
 |  | /s/  Chad
    M. Utrup Chad
    M. Utrup
 Chief Financial Officer
 | 
 
    March 13, 2008
    
    95
 
    Report of
    Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
    To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
 
    We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
    Company) as of December 31, 2007, based on
    criteria established in Internal Control 
    Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
    Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys
    management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
    control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
    included in the accompanying Managements Report on
    Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
    to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
    over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
    We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
    standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
    reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
    over financial reporting was maintained in all material
    respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
    internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
    that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
    design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
    the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
    considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
    audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
    A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
    process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
    companys principal executive and principal financial
    officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
    by the companys board of directors, management, and other
    personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
    reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
    consolidated financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
    companys internal control over financial reporting
    includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
    the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
    accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
    of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
    assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
    preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance
    with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
    and expenditures of the company are being made only in
    accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
    the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
    prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use,
    or disposition of the companys assets that could have a
    material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
 
    Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
    financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
    improper management override of controls, material misstatements
    due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
    timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
    effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
    to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
    become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
    degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
    deteriorate.
 
    In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
    respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
    of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
    Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued
    by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
    Commission.
 
    We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
    consolidated financial statements and financial statement
    schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 of
    the Company and our report dated March 13, 2008 expressed
    an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
    statements and financial statement schedules and included an
    explanatory paragraph that as discussed in Note 9 to the
    consolidated financial statements effective January 1,
    2007, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for
    uncertain income tax provisions.
 
    /s/  Deloitte &
    Touche LLP
 
 
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    March 13, 2008
    
    96
 
    Changes
    in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
    No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as
    defined in
    Rules 13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f)
    under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended
    December 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is
    reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
    over financial reporting.
 
    Item 9B.  Other
    Information
 
 
    None.
 
    PART III
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 10. | Directors,
    Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | A. | Directors
    of the Registrant | 
 
    The following table sets forth certain information with respect
    to our current directors as of December 31, 2007:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Name
 |  | 
    Age
 |  | 
    Principal Position(s)
 | 
|  | 
| 
    Scott D. Rued
 |  |  | 51 |  |  | Chairman and Director | 
| 
    Mervin Dunn
 |  |  | 54 |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | 
| 
    Scott C. Arves
 |  |  | 51 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    David R. Bovee
 |  |  | 58 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    Robert C. Griffin
 |  |  | 59 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    S.A. Johnson
 |  |  | 67 |  |  | Director | 
| 
    Richard A. Snell
 |  |  | 66 |  |  | Director | 
 
    The following biographies describe the business experience of
    our directors:
 
    Scott D. Rued has served as a Director since February
    2001 and Chairman since April 2002. Since August 2003,
    Mr. Rued has served as a Managing Partner of Thayer Capital
    Partners (Thayer). Prior to joining Thayer,
    Mr. Rued served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
    Hidden Creek Industries (Hidden Creek) from May 2000
    to August 2003. From January 1994 through April 2000,
    Mr. Rued served as Executive Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer of Hidden Creek.
 
    Scott C. Arves has served as a Director since July 2005.
    Since January 2007, Mr. Arves has served as President and
    Chief Executive Officer of Transport America, a truckload,
    intermodal and logistics services provider. Prior to joining
    Transport America, Mr. Arves was President of
    Transportation for Schneider National, Inc., a provider of
    transportation, logistics and related services, from May 2000 to
    July 2006.
 
    David R. Bovee has served as a Director since October
    2004. Mr. Bovee served as Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.
    (Dura) from January 2001 to March 2005 and from
    November 1990 to May 1997. In October 2006, when Mr. Bovee
    was no longer affiliated with that company, Dura filed a
    voluntary petition for reorganization under the federal
    bankruptcy laws. From May 1997 until January 2001,
    Mr. Bovee served as Vice President of Business Development.
    Mr. Bovee also served as Assistant Secretary for Dura.
    Prior to joining Dura, Mr. Bovee served as Vice President
    at Wickes in its Automotive Group from 1987 to 1990.
 
    Robert C. Griffin has served as a Director since July
    2005. Mr. Griffin has held numerous positions of
    responsibility in the financial sector, including Head of
    Investment Banking, Americas and Management Committee Member for
    Barclays Capital from 2000 to 2002, and prior to that as
    the Global Head of Financial Sponsor Coverage for Bank of
    America Securities from 1998 to 2000 and Group Executive Vice
    President of Bank of America from 1997 to 1998. Mr. Griffin
    also currently serves as a Director of Builders FirstSource,
    Inc. and Sunair Services Corporation.
    
    97
 
    S.A. (Tony) Johnson has served as a Director
    since September 2000. Mr. Johnson is currently a Managing
    Partner of OG Partners, a private industrial management company,
    and has served in that capacity since 2004. Mr. Johnson
    served as the Chairman of Hidden Creek from May 2001 to May 2004
    and from 1989 to May 2001 was its Chief Executive Officer and
    President. Prior to forming Hidden Creek, Mr. Johnson
    served from 1985 to 1989 as Chief Operating Officer of Pentair,
    Inc., a diversified industrial company. Mr. Johnson also
    currently serves as a Director of Cooper-Standard Automotive,
    Inc.
 
    Richard A. Snell has served as a Director since August
    2004. Mr. Snell has served as Chairman and Chief Executive
    Officer of Qualitor, Inc. since May 2005 and as an Operating
    Partner at Thayer Capital Partners since 2003. Prior to joining
    Thayer Capital Partners, Mr. Snell was a consultant from
    2000 to 2003 and prior thereto, served as Chairman and Chief
    Executive Officer of Federal-Mogul Corporation, an automotive
    parts manufacturer, from 1996 to 2000. Prior to joining
    Federal-Mogul Corporation, Mr. Snell served as Chief
    Executive Officer at Tenneco Automotive, also an automotive
    parts manufacturer. Mr. Snell also currently serves as a
    Director of Schneider National, Inc.
 
    B. Executive
    Officers
 
    The following table sets forth certain information with respect
    to our current executive officers as of December 31, 2007:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Name
 |  | 
    Age
 |  | 
    Principal Position(s)
 | 
|  | 
| 
    Gerald L. Armstrong
 |  |  | 46 |  |  | President  CVG Global Truck | 
| 
    W. Gordon Boyd
 |  |  | 60 |  |  | President  CVG Global Construction | 
| 
    Mervin Dunn
 |  |  | 54 |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | 
| 
    Kevin R.L. Frailey
 |  |  | 41 |  |  | Executive Vice President of Business Development | 
| 
    Chad M. Utrup
 |  |  | 35 |  |  | Chief Financial Officer | 
| 
    James F. Williams
 |  |  | 61 |  |  | Vice President of Human Resources | 
 
    The following biographies describe the business experience of
    our executive officers:
 
    Gerald L. Armstrong has served as President 
    CVG Global Truck since November 2006. From April 2004 to
    November 2006, Mr. Armstrong served as
    President  CVG Americas and from July 2002 to April
    2004 as Vice President and General Manager of National Seating
    and KAB North America. Prior to joining us, Mr. Armstrong
    served from 1995 to 2000 and from 2000 to July 2002 as Vice
    President and General Manager, respectively, of Gabriel Ride
    Control Products, a manufacturer of shock absorbers and related
    ride control products for the automotive and light truck
    markets, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ArvinMeritor Inc.
    Mr. Armstrong began his service with ArvinMeritor Inc., a
    manufacturer of automotive and commercial vehicle components,
    modules and systems in 1987, and served in various positions of
    increasing responsibility within its light vehicle original
    equipment and aftermarket divisions before starting at Gabriel
    Ride Control Products. Prior to 1987, Mr. Armstrong held
    various positions of increasing responsibility including Quality
    Engineer and Senior Quality Supervisor and Quality Manager with
    Schlumberger Industries and Hyster Corporation.
 
    W. Gordon Boyd has served as President 
    CVG Global Construction since November 2006. From June 2005 to
    November 2006, Mr. Boyd served as President  CVG
    International and prior thereto served as our
    President  Mayflower Vehicle Systems from the time we
    completed the acquisition of Mayflower in February 2005.
    Mr. Boyd joined Mayflower Vehicle Systems U.K. as
    Manufacturing Director in 1993. In 2002, Mr. Boyd became
    President and Chief Executive Officer of MVS, Inc.
 
    Mervin Dunn has served as a Director since August 2004
    and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since June
    2002, and prior thereto served as the President of Trim Systems,
    commencing upon his joining us in October 1999. From 1998 to
    1999, Mr. Dunn served as the President and Chief Executive
    Officer of Bliss Technologies, a heavy metal stamping company.
    From 1988 to 1998, Mr. Dunn served in a number of key
    leadership roles at Arvin Industries, including Vice President
    of Operating Systems (Arvin North America), Vice President of
    Quality, and President of Arvin Ride Control. From 1985 to 1988,
    Mr. Dunn held several key management positions in
    engineering and quality assurance at Johnson Controls Automotive
    Group, an automotive trim company, including
    Division Quality Manager. From 1980 to 1985, Mr. Dunn
    served in a number of management positions for
    
    98
 
    engineering and quality departments of Hyster Corporation, a
    manufacturer of heavy lift trucks. Mr. Dunn also currently
    serves as a director of Transdigm Group, Inc.
 
    Kevin R.L. Frailey has served as Executive Vice President
    of Business Development since February 2007. Prior to joining
    us, Mr. Frailey served as General Manager for Joint
    Ventures and Business Strategy at ArvinMeritors Emissions
    Technologies Group from 2003 to early 2007. From 1988 to 2007,
    Mr. Frailey held several key management positions in
    engineering, sales and worldwide supplier development at
    ArvinMeritor. In addition, during that time Mr. Frailey
    served on the board of various joint ventures, most notably
    those of Arvin Sango, Inc., and AD Tech Co., Ltd.
 
    Chad M. Utrup has served as the Chief Financial Officer
    since January 2003, and prior thereto served as the Vice
    President of Finance at Trim Systems since 2000. Prior to
    joining us in February 1998, Mr. Utrup served as a project
    management group member at Electronic Data Systems. While with
    Electronic Data Systems, Mr. Utrups responsibilities
    included financial support and implementing cost recovery and
    efficiency programs at various Delphi Automotive Systems support
    locations.
 
    James F. Williams has served as the Vice President of
    Human Resources since August 1999. Prior to joining us,
    Mr. Williams served as Corporate Vice President of Human
    Resources and Administration for SPECO Corporation from January
    1996 to August 1999. From April 1984 to January 1996,
    Mr. Williams served in various key human resource
    management positions in General Electrics Turbine,
    Lighting and Semi Conductor business. In addition,
    Mr. Williams served as Manager of Labor Relations and
    Personnel Services at Mack Trucks Allentown Corporate
    location from 1976 to 1984.
 
    There are no family relationships between any of our directors
    or executive officers.
 
    |  |  | 
    | C. | Section 16(a)
    Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | 
 
    The information required by Item 10 with respect to
    compliance with reporting requirements is incorporated herein by
    reference to the section labeled Section 16(a)
    Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance which appears in
    CVGs 2008 Proxy Statement.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 11. | Executive
    Compensation | 
 
    The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the sections labeled Director
    Compensation and Executive Compensation and Other
    Matters which appear in CVGs 2008 Proxy Statement
    excluding information under the headings Compensation
    Discussion and Analysis.
    
    99
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 12. | Security
    Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
    Related Stockholder Matters | 
 
    Options to purchase common shares of our common stock have been
    granted to certain of our executives and key employees under our
    amended and restated equity incentive plan and our management
    stock option plan. The following table summarizes the number of
    stock options granted, net of forfeitures and exercises, and
    shares of restricted stock awarded and issued, net of
    forfeitures and shares on which restrictions have lapsed, the
    weighted-average exercise price of such stock options and the
    number of securities remaining to be issued under all
    outstanding equity compensation plans as of December 31,
    2007:
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Number of 
 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  | Weighted-Average 
 |  |  | Securities 
 |  | 
|  |  | Number of Securities to be 
 |  |  | Exercise Price of 
 |  |  | Remaining Available 
 |  | 
|  |  | Issued upon Exercise of 
 |  |  | Outstanding 
 |  |  | for Future Issuance 
 |  | 
|  |  | Outstanding Options, 
 |  |  | Options, Warrants 
 |  |  | Under Equity 
 |  | 
|  |  | Warrants and Rights(1) |  |  | and Rights |  |  | Compensation Plans |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Stock Options
 |  |  | 492,184 |  |  | $ | 15.84 |  |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Restricted Stock
 |  |  | 520,165 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2 | ) | 
| 
    Management Stock Option Plan
 |  |  | 228,411 |  |  | $ | 5.54 |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Total
 |  |  | 1,240,760 |  |  | $ | 12.03 |  |  |  | 798,598 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | (1) |  | In connection with our merger with Trim Systems, Inc., options
    to purchase shares of Trim Systems, Inc.s common stock
    were converted into options to purchase shares of our common
    stock. Of these, options to purchase an aggregate of
    28,951 shares at a weighted-average exercise price of $9.43
    per share were outstanding at December 31, 2006. These
    options are not included in the table. | 
|  | 
    | (2) |  | 798,598 shares are available for future issuance under our
    Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. | 
 
    The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the sections labeled Security Ownership of
    Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
    Employee Benefit Plans, which appear in CVGs
    2008 Proxy Statement.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 13. | Certain
    Relationships, Related Transactions and Director
    Independence | 
 
    The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the section labeled Certain Relationships
    and Related Transactions and
    Proposal No. 1  Election of
    Directors  Director Independence which appears
    in CVGs 2008 Proxy Statement.
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 14. | Principal
    Accountant Fees and Services | 
 
    The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein
    by reference to the section labeled Principal Accountant
    Fees and Services which appears in CVGs 2008 Proxy
    Statement.
    
    100
 
 
    PART IV
 
    |  |  | 
    | Item 15. | Exhibits
    and Financial Statements Schedules | 
 
    |  |  | 
    | (1) | LIST OF
    FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | 
 
    The following financial statement schedules of the
    Corporation and its subsidiaries are included herein:
 
    Schedule II 
    Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves.
 
    COMMERCIAL
    VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    
 
    SCHEDULE II:
    VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
    
    December 31,
    2007, 2006 and 2005
 
    Allowance
    for Doubtful Accounts:
 
    The transactions in the allowance for doubtful account for the
    years ended December 31 were as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of the year
 |  | $ | 5,536 |  |  | $ | 6,087 |  |  | $ | 2,681 |  | 
| 
    Acquisition recorded
 |  |  | 105 |  |  |  | 119 |  |  |  | 1,524 |  | 
| 
    Provisions
 |  |  | 5,076 |  |  |  | 4,246 |  |  |  | 4,287 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  | (6,915 | ) |  |  | (4,963 | ) |  |  | (2,194 | ) | 
| 
    Currency translation adjustment
 |  |  | (44 | ) |  |  | 47 |  |  |  | (211 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of the year
 |  | $ | 3,758 |  |  | $ | 5,536 |  |  | $ | 6,087 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Additional
    Purchase Liabilities Recorded in Conjunction with
    Acquisitions:
 
    The transactions in the purchase liabilities account recorded in
    conjunction with acquisitions for the years ended December 31
    were as follows (in thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of the year
 |  | $ | 247 |  |  | $ | 317 |  |  | $ | 423 |  | 
| 
    Provisions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  | (141 | ) |  |  | (70 | ) |  |  | (106 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of the year
 |  | $ | 106 |  |  | $ | 247 |  |  | $ | 317 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    Facility
    Closure and Consolidation Costs:
 
    The transactions in the facility closure and consolidation costs
    account for the years ended December 31 were as follows (in
    thousands):
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  | 2007 |  |  | 2006 |  |  | 2005 |  | 
|  | 
| 
    Balance  Beginning of the year
 |  | $ | 60 |  |  | $ | 2,013 |  |  | $ | 278 |  | 
| 
    Provisions
 |  |  | 810 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2,013 |  | 
| 
    Utilizations
 |  |  | (224 | ) |  |  | (1,953 | ) |  |  | (278 | ) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Balance  End of the year
 |  | $ | 646 |  |  | $ | 60 |  |  | $ | 2,013 |  | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
 
    All other schedules for which provision is made in the
    applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required
    under the related instructions or are inapplicable and,
    therefore, have been omitted.
    
    101
 
 
    The following exhibits are either included in this report or
    incorporated herein by reference as indicated below:
 
    EXHIBIT INDEX
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 2 | .1 |  | Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated February 7, 2004, by
    and among, CVG Acquisition LLC, Mayflower Vehicle Systems, Inc.,
    Mayflower Vehicle Systems Michigan, Inc., Wayne Stamping and
    Assembly LLC and Wayne-Orrville Investments LLC (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15, 2005). | 
|  | 2 | .2 |  | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2005, by and
    between Monona Holdings LLC and Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
    on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 2 | .3 |  | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2005, by
    and between Trim Systems, Inc. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc. and the
    Shareholders listed therein (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890)
    filed on August 12, 2005). | 
|  | 3 | .1 |  | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Commercial
    Vehicle Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 3 | .2 |  | Amended and Restated By-laws of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
    report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 4 | .1 |  | Indenture, dated July 6, 2005, among the Company, the
    subsidiary guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National
    Association, as Trustee, with respect to 8.0% senior notes
    due 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to the Companys
    current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 8, 2005). | 
|  | 4 | .2 |  | Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2005, by and
    among the Company, Cabarrus Plastics, Inc., the subsidiary
    guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
    on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890)
    filed on August 12, 2005). | 
|  | 4 | .3 |  | Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 10, 2006,
    among the Company, CVG European Holdings, LLC, the subsidiary
    guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys annual report
    on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 13, 2007). | 
|  | 4 | .4 |  | Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 28, 2007,
    among the Company, CVG Oregon, LLC, the subsidiary guarantors
    party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association. | 
|  | 4 | .5 |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 6, 2005, among
    the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and the
    purchasers named therein (incorporated herein by reference to
    the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 8, 2005). | 
|  | 4 | .6 |  | Form of senior note (attached as exhibit to Exhibit 4.1). | 
|  | 10 | .1 |  | Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
    August 10, 2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group,
    Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
    thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties hereto,
    U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
    banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .2 |  | First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of September 16, 2004, by and among Commercial
    Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
    time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
    hereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
    banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15, 2005). | 
    
    102
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .3 |  | Second Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of February 7, 2005, by and among Commercial
    Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
    time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
    hereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
    banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .4 |  | Third Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of June 3, 2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
    thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
    U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
    banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .5 |  | Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of June 29, 2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
    thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
    U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
    banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Company s current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 6, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .6 |  | Fifth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of July 12, 2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
    thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
    U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank one of the
    banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on July 14, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .7 |  | Sixth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of December 30, 2005, by and among Commercial
    Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
    time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
    thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
    the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on January 1, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .8 |  | Waiver and Seventh Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
    Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2007, by and among
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from
    time to time parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers
    from time to time parties thereto, the banks from time to time
    parties thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the
    banks, as administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank,
    one of the banks, as syndication agent for the banks
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
    report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on August 3, 2007). | 
|  | 10 | .9 |  | Eighth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of June 26, 2007, by and among Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
    thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
    U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agent for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
    the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on August 3, 2007). | 
|  | 10 | .10 |  | Amendment and Waiver Letter to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
    Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2007, by and among
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from
    time to time parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers
    from time to time parties thereto, the banks from time to time
    parties thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the
    banks, as administrative agents for the banks, and Comerica
    Bank, one of the banks, as syndication agent for the banks
    (incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
    on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on October 1, 2007). | 
    103
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .11 |  | Tenth Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of September 28, 2007, by and among Commercial
    Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
    time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
    thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agents for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
    the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on October 1, 2007). | 
|  | 10 | .12 |  | Eleventh Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
    dated as of March 10, 2008, by and among Commercial Vehicle
    Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
    thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
    parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
    U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
    administrative agents for the banks, and Comerica Bank, one of
    the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 14, 2008). | 
|  | 10 | .13 |  | Note Purchase Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, by and
    among Bostrom Holding, Inc., Baird Capital Partners II
    Limited, BCP II Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership, Baird
    Capital II Limited Partnership, Baird Capital
    Partners III Limited Partnership, BCP III Special
    Affiliates Limited Partnership, BCP III Affiliates
    Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP
    and Hidden Creek Industries (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .14 |  | Form of Subordinated Promissory Note issued by Bostrom Holding,
    Inc. in favor of each of BCP II Affiliates Fund Limited
    Partnership, Baird Capital II Limited Partnership, Baird
    Capital Partners III Limited Partnership, BCP III Special
    Affiliates Limited Partnership BCP III Affiliates
    Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP
    and Hidden Creek Industries (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .15* |  | Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
    by reference to the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .16* |  | Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
    Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
    by reference to the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .17* |  | Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity
    Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-59890),
    filed on May 11, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .18* |  | Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Second Amended and Restated
    Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890)
    filed on May 25, 2007). | 
|  | 10 | .19* |  | Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
    Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity
    Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Companys
    annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 15, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .20 |  | Form of Non-Competition Agreement (incorporated by reference to
    the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .21 |  | Registration Agreement, dated October 5, 2000, by and among
    Bostrom Holding, Inc. and the investors listed on
    Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated by reference to
    the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .22 |  | Joinder to Registration Agreement, dated as of March 28,
    2003, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and J2R Partners VI,
    CVS Partners, LP and CVS Executive Investco LLC (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-15708),
    filed on May 21,2004). | 
|  | 10 | .23 |  | Joinder to the Registration Agreement, dated as of May 20,
    2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and the prior
    stockholders of Trim Systems (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on September 17, 2004). | 
|  | 10 | .24* |  | Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 2007 Bonus Plan (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on March 9, 2007). | 
    104
 
    |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Exhibit No.
 |  | 
    Description
 | 
|  | 
|  | 10 | .25* |  | Service Agreement, dated March 1, 1993, between Motor
    Panels (Coventry) Plc and William Gordon Boyd (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-125626),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .26* |  | Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 1,
    2004, between Mayflower Vehicle Systems PLC and Mayflower
    Vehicle Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-1
    (File
    No. 333-125626),
    filed on June 8, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .27* |  | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Commercial
    Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan
    (incorporated by reference to amendment no. 1 to the
    Companys registration statement on
    Form S-4
    (File
    No. 333-129368),
    filed on December 1, 2005). | 
|  | 10 | .28* |  | Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
    April 5, 2006 with Mervin Dunn (incorporated by reference
    to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .29* |  | Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
    April 5, 2006 with Gerald L. Armstrong (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .30* |  | Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
    April 5, 2006 with Chad M. Utrup (incorporated by reference
    to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .31* |  | Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
    April 5, 2006 with James F. Williams (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on April 7, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .32* |  | Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
    May 22, 2007 with Kevin R.L. Frailey (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on May 25, 2007). | 
|  | 10 | .33* |  | Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement dated
    May 22, 2007 with William Gordon Boyd (incorporated by
    reference to the Companys current report on
    Form 8-K
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on May 25, 2007). | 
|  | 10 | .34* |  | Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the
    Companys quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    (File
    No. 000-50890),
    filed on November 6, 2006). | 
|  | 10 | .35* |  | Form of indemnification agreement with directors and executive
    officers. | 
|  | 10 | .36* |  | Terms of employment for executive officers. | 
|  | 12 | .1 |  | Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges. | 
|  | 21 | .1 |  | Subsidiaries of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. | 
|  | 23 | .1 |  | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. | 
|  | 31 | .1 |  | Certification by Mervin Dunn, President and Chief Executive
    Officer. | 
|  | 31 | .2 |  | Certification by Chad M. Utrup, Chief Financial Officer. | 
|  | 32 | .1 |  | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
    adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | 
|  | 32 | .2 |  | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
    adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | 
 
 
    |  |  |  | 
    | * |  | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
    to be filed as an exhibit to this annual report on
    Form 10-K. | 
 
    All other items included in an Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    are omitted because they are not applicable or the answers
    thereto are none.
    105
 
 
    SIGNATURES
 
    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
    this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
    thereunto duly authorized.
 
    COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
 
    Scott D. Rued
    Chairman
 
    Date: March 13, 2008
 
    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this
    report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
    of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
    indicated.
 
    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| 
    Signature
 |  | 
    Title
 |  | 
    Date
 | 
|  | 
| /s/  SCOTT
    D. RUED Scott
    D. Rued
 |  | Chairman and Director |  | March 13, 2008 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  MERVIN
    DUNN Mervin
    Dunn
 |  | President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
    and Director |  | March 13, 2008 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  SCOTT
    C. ARVES Scott
    C. Arves
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2008 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  DAVID
    R. BOVEE David
    R. Bovee
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2008 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  ROBERT
    C. GRIFFIN Robert
    C. Griffin
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2008 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  S.A.
    JOHNSON S.A.
    Johnson
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2008 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  RICHARD
    A. SNELL Richard
    A. Snell
 |  | Director |  | March 13, 2008 | 
|  |  |  |  |  | 
| /s/  CHAD
    M. UTRUP Chad
    M. Utrup
 |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 |  | March 13, 2008 | 
    
    106
 
