Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34365
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
41-1990662 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
7800 Walton Parkway New Albany, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices) |
43054 (Zip Code) |
(614) 289-5360
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants common stock, par value $.01 per share, at
June 30, 2010 was 28,563,351 shares.
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
1 | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
Certification of CEO |
||||||||
Certification of CFO |
||||||||
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 |
||||||||
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 |
||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
i
Table of Contents
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
REVENUES |
$ | 142,349 | $ | 103,503 | $ | 288,756 | $ | 212,033 | ||||||||
COST OF REVENUES |
124,593 | 104,592 | 254,108 | 216,371 | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit (Loss) |
17,756 | (1,089 | ) | 34,648 | (4,338 | ) | ||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
13,668 | 10,366 | 26,879 | 23,709 | ||||||||||||
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE |
60 | 97 | 120 | 194 | ||||||||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
| 7,000 | | 7,000 | ||||||||||||
LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
| 3,445 | | 3,445 | ||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING COSTS |
1,410 | 235 | 1,410 | 1,947 | ||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
2,618 | (22,232 | ) | 6,239 | (40,633 | ) | ||||||||||
OTHER INCOME |
(1,281 | ) | (3,505 | ) | (2,740 | ) | (8,397 | ) | ||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
3,907 | 3,666 | 8,421 | 7,310 | ||||||||||||
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT |
| | | 795 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) Income Before Provision for Income Taxes |
(8 | ) | (22,393 | ) | 558 | (40,341 | ) | |||||||||
(BENEFIT) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
(701 | ) | 120 | (811 | ) | 1,576 | ||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | 693 | $ | (22,513 | ) | $ | 1,369 | $ | (41,917 | ) | ||||||
INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (1.04 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (1.93 | ) | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (1.04 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (1.93 | ) | ||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
27,214 | 21,747 | 24,973 | 21,747 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
27,973 | 21,747 | 25,820 | 21,747 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
(In thousands, except share | ||||||||
and per share amounts) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 52,371 | $ | 9,524 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $2,249 and
$1,812, respectfully |
75,285 | 74,063 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
62,950 | 58,051 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other, net |
13,796 | 26,781 | ||||||
Total current assets |
204,402 | 168,419 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net |
56,282 | 62,315 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization of $2,125 and $2,006,
respectively |
3,968 | 4,087 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS, net |
12,254 | 15,688 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 276,906 | $ | 250,509 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
58,262 | 59,657 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities, other |
34,940 | 32,977 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
93,202 | 92,634 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT |
164,765 | 162,644 | ||||||
PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS |
25,410 | 26,915 | ||||||
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
3,907 | 6,081 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
287,284 | 288,274 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 12) |
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT: |
||||||||
Preferred stock $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued and outstanding; common stock $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 27,339,930 and 22,070,531 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
274 | 221 | ||||||
Treasury stock purchased from employees; 130,674 shares, respectively |
(1,090 | ) | (1,090 | ) | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
214,016 | 186,291 | ||||||
Retained loss |
(198,477 | ) | (199,846 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(25,101 | ) | (23,341 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders deficit |
(10,378 | ) | (37,765 | ) | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
$ | 276,906 | $ | 250,509 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,369 | $ | (41,917 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
6,177 | 8,853 | ||||||
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs |
757 | 685 | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
| 795 | ||||||
Amortization of bond discount/premium, net |
(632 | ) | | |||||
Paid-in-kind interest |
2,753 | | ||||||
Shared-based compensation expense |
1,345 | 1,458 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |
(51 | ) | 552 | |||||
Noncash gain on forward exchange contracts |
(2,355 | ) | (8,350 | ) | ||||
Intangible asset impairment |
| 7,000 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 3,445 | ||||||
Change in other operating items |
10,682 | 45,783 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
20,045 | 18,304 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(2,770 | ) | (3,177 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal/sale of property plant and equipment |
65 | 14 | ||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
196 | (1,529 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,509 | ) | (4,692 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
25,359 | | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under equity incentive plans |
1,126 | | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from equity incentive plans |
(52 | ) | | |||||
Repayment of revolving credit facility |
| (191,656 | ) | |||||
Borrowings under revolving credit facility |
| 180,240 | ||||||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
| (72 | ) | |||||
Debt issuance costs and other |
| (2,669 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
26,433 | (14,157 | ) | |||||
EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
(1,122 | ) | (656 | ) | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH |
42,847 | (1,201 | ) | |||||
CASH: |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
9,524 | 7,310 | ||||||
End of period |
$ | 52,371 | $ | 6,109 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 5,406 | $ | 6,568 | ||||
Cash received for income taxes, net |
$ | (21,565 | ) | $ | (4,858 | ) | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (CVG, Company or we) design and
manufacture seat systems, interior trim systems (including instrument and door panels, headliners,
cabinetry, molded products and floor systems), cab structures and components, mirrors, wiper
systems, electronic wiring harness assemblies and controls and switches for the global commercial
vehicle market, including the heavy-duty truck market, the construction, military, bus, agriculture
and specialty transportation market. We have facilities located in the United States in Arizona,
Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Virginia and Washington and
outside of the United States in Australia, Belgium, China, Czech Republic, Mexico, Ukraine and the
United Kingdom.
We have prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein, without audit,
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The information furnished in the condensed consolidated financial statements includes
normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and statements of financial position
for the interim periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations. We believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading when read in conjunction with our fiscal 2009 consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K as filed with the SEC on March 12, 2010. Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts are in
thousands except per share amounts.
Revenues and operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected in future operating quarters.
2. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-6, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,
which requires interim disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level
2 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-6 requires disclosure for each class of assets
and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. These disclosures are required
for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. Further, ASU 2010-6 requires
separate presentation of Level 3 activity for the fair value measurements. We adopted the interim
disclosure requirements under this standard during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, with the
exception of the separate presentation in the Level 3 activity rollforward, which is not effective
until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal
years.
3. Fair Value Measurement
Accounting guidance on fair value measurement defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels
based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the
most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management
judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. |
Level 2 Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets. |
Level 3 Unobservable inputs reflecting managements own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability. |
4
Table of Contents
The fair values of our financial assets and liabilities are categorized as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets (1) |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 66 | | $ | 66 | $ | | |||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities (1) |
$ | 1,980 | $ | | $ | 1,980 | $ | | $ | 4,400 | $ | | $ | 4,400 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | Based on observable market transactions of spot and forward rates. |
Our derivative assets and liabilities represent foreign exchange contracts that are measured at
fair value using observable market inputs such as forward rates, interest rates, our own credit
risk and our counterparties credit risks. Based on these inputs, the derivative assets and
liabilities are classified as Level 2.
The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 164,765 | $ | 145,349 | $ | 162,644 | $ | 103,473 |
The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:
Long-term debt. The fair value of long-term debt
is based on quoted market prices or on rates available on debt with similar terms and maturities.
4. Restructuring Activities
In the three months ended December 31, 2009, we announced the following restructuring plans:
| The closure and consolidation of one of our facilities located in Liberec, Czech Republic, which was a result of managements continued focus on reducing fixed costs and eliminating excess capacity. We substantially completed the closure as of December 31, 2009. | ||
| The closure of our Norwalk, Ohio truck cab assembly facility, which was a result of Navistars decision to insource the cab assembly operations into its existing assembly facility in Escobedo, Mexico. We substantially completed the Norwalk closure as of June 30, 2010. |
We estimate that we will record total charges for these restructuring activities of approximately
$4.4 million, consisting of approximately $0.8 million of employee-related costs and approximately
$3.6 million of facility closure and other costs. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we
recorded restructuring charges of approximately $1.4 million, consisting of approximately $0.4
million of employee-related costs and approximately $1.0 million of facility closure and other
costs. We have incurred cumulative restructuring charges relating to these activities of
approximately $3.1 million through June 30, 2010.
A summary of the restructuring liability for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows (in
thousands):
Facility | ||||||||||||
Exit | ||||||||||||
and Other | ||||||||||||
Employee | Contractual | |||||||||||
Costs | Costs | Total | ||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2009 |
$ | 337 | $ | 1,454 | $ | 1,791 | ||||||
Provisions |
381 | 806 | 1,187 | |||||||||
Utilizations |
(105 | ) | (342 | ) | (447 | ) | ||||||
Currency Translation |
| (161 | ) | (161 | ) | |||||||
Balance June 30, 2010 |
$ | 613 | $ | 1,757 | $ | 2,370 | ||||||
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we established an additional restructuring reserve
relating to the closure of our Norwalk, Ohio facility for one-time termination benefits and the
fair value of the remaining lease rentals.
5
Table of Contents
As a result of the closure of our Norwalk, Ohio facility, we are actively marketing the sale of
approximately $2.4 million of assets consisting of $1.5 million in land and building and
approximately $0.9 million in machinery and equipment. We expect to substantially complete this
activity within this fiscal year and have, therefore, classified the assets as held-for-sale.
5. Share-Based Compensation
Restricted Stock Awards Restricted stock is a grant of shares of common stock that may not be
sold, encumbered or disposed of, and that may be forfeited in the event of certain terminations of
employment, prior to the end of a restricted period set by the compensation committee. A
participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the rights of a stockholder, unless the
compensation committee determines otherwise. Listed below is a summary of our restricted stock
awards:
In October 2007, 328,900 shares of restricted stock were awarded by our compensation committee
under our Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock
granted in October 2007 vest in three equal annual installments commencing on October 20, 2008.
In November 2008, 798,450 shares of restricted stock were awarded by our compensation committee
under our Second Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock
granted in November 2008 vest in three equal annual installments commencing on October 20, 2009.
In November 2009, 638,150 shares of restricted stock were awarded by our compensation committee
under our Third Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan). The shares of restricted
stock granted in November 2009 vest in three equal annual installments commencing on October 20,
2010.
As of June 30, 2010, there was approximately $3.1 million of unearned compensation expense related
to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. This expense is
subject to future adjustments for vesting and forfeitures and will be recognized on a straight-line
basis over the remaining period of four months for the October 2007 awards, 16 months for the
November 2008 awards and 28 months for the November 2009 awards, respectively.
We currently estimate the forfeiture rates for the October 2007, November 2008 and November 2009
restricted stock awards at 8.0%, 8.2% and 8.2%, respectively, for all participants in the Plan.
The following table summarizes information about the non-vested restricted stock grants as of June
30, 2010:
Weighted-Average | ||||||||
Shares | Grant-Date Fair | |||||||
(in thousands) | Value | |||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2009 |
1,226 | $ | 7.60 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
| | ||||||
Forfeited |
(3 | ) | 3.93 | |||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2010 |
1,223 | $ | 7.61 | |||||
As of June 30, 2010, 656,038 shares of the 3.2 million shares authorized for issuance were
available for issuance under the Plan, including cumulative forfeitures.
6. Stockholders Investment
Common Stock Our authorized capital stock consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock with a
par value of $0.01 per share, with 28,563,351 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
Preferred Stock Our authorized capital stock consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with
a par value of $0.01 per share, with no preferred shares outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share, and all
other diluted per share amounts presented, is determined by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period as
determined by the Treasury Stock Method, as amended. Potential
6
Table of Contents
common shares are included in the
diluted earnings per share calculation when dilutive. Diluted earnings per share for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 includes the effects of potential common shares consisting of
common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options when dilutive (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders
basic and diluted |
$ | 693 | $ | (22,513 | ) | $ | 1,369 | $ | (41,917 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
27,214 | 21,747 | 24,973 | 21,747 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and
restricted stock
grants after application of the Treasury Stock Method |
759 | | 847 | | ||||||||||||
Dilutive shares outstanding |
27,973 | 21,747 | 25,820 | 21,747 | ||||||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (1.04 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (1.93 | ) | ||||||
Diluted income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (1.04 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (1.93 | ) | ||||||
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, diluted earnings per share did not include approximately
0.5 million outstanding stock options as the effect would have been antidilutive. For the three
months ended June 30, 2009, diluted loss per share did not include approximately 0.7 million
outstanding stock options and approximately 1.0 million non-vested restricted stock, as the effect
would have been antidilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, diluted earnings per share
did not include approximately 0.5 million outstanding stock options as the effect would have been
antidilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, diluted loss per share did not include
approximately 0.7 million outstanding stock options and approximately 1.0 million non-vested
restricted stock, as the effect would have been antidilutive.
Dividends We have not declared or paid any cash dividends in the past. The terms of our Loan and
Security Agreement restrict the payment or distribution of our cash or other assets, including cash
dividend payments.
Stockholder Rights Plan In May 2009, our board of directors adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan
(Rights Plan) intended to protect stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover
tactics.
Under the Rights Plan, with certain exceptions, the rights will become exercisable only if a person
or group acquires 20 percent or more of our outstanding common stock or commences a tender or
exchange offer that could result in ownership of 20 percent or more of our common stock. The
Rights Plan has a term of 10 years and will expire on May 20, 2019, unless the rights are earlier
redeemed or terminated by the board of directors.
Common Stock Warrants On August 4, 2009, we issued 745,000 warrants to purchase common stock.
Each warrant was issued as part of a unit consisting of (i) $1,000 principal amount of 11%/13%
third lien senior secured notes due 2013 and (ii) 17.68588 warrants. The units are immediately
separable. The units were issued pursuant to a warrant and unit agreement with U.S. Bank National
Association, as unit agent and warrant agent. As of June 30, 2010, approximately 741,073 warrants
have been exercised.
Each warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise
price of $0.35 per share. The warrants provide for mandatory cashless exercise. The number of
shares for which a warrant may be exercised and the exercise price are subject to adjustment in
certain events. The warrants are exercisable at any time on or after separation and prior to their
expiration on August 4, 2019.
7. Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are stated at current value less an allowance for doubtful accounts,
which approximates fair value. This estimated allowance is based primarily on managements
evaluation of specific balances as the balances become past due, the financial condition of our
customers and our historical experience of write-offs. If not reserved through specific
identification procedures, our general policy for uncollectible accounts is to reserve at a certain
percentage threshold, based upon the aging categories of accounts receivable and our historical
experience with write-offs. Past due status is based upon the due date of the original amounts
outstanding. When items are ultimately deemed uncollectible, they are charged off against the
reserve previously established in the allowance for doubtful accounts.
7
Table of Contents
8. Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market. Cost includes
applicable material, labor and overhead. Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 47,355 | $ | 41,677 | ||||
Work in process |
10,336 | 8,955 | ||||||
Finished goods |
12,101 | 14,433 | ||||||
Less excess and obsolete |
(6,842 | ) | (7,014 | ) | ||||
$ | 62,950 | $ | 58,051 | |||||
Inventory quantities on-hand are regularly reviewed and, where necessary, provisions for excess and
obsolete inventory are recorded based primarily on our estimated production requirements driven by
expected market volumes. Excess and obsolete provisions may vary by product depending upon future
potential use of the product.
9. Intangible Assets
We review definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. A determination is
made by management to ascertain whether property and equipment and certain definite-lived
intangibles have been impaired based on the sum of expected future undiscounted cash flows from
operating activities. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount
of such assets, we will recognize an impairment loss in an amount necessary to write down the
assets to fair value as determined from expected discounted future cash flows.
Our intangible assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Gross | Net | Average | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Amortization | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period | Amount | Amortization | Amount | Period | Amount | Amortization | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks/Tradenames |
20 years | $ | 5,655 | $ | (1,687 | ) | $ | 3,968 | 20 years | $ | 5,655 | $ | (1,568) | $ | 4,087 |
The aggregate intangible asset amortization expense was approximately $60 thousand and $97
thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and approximately $120
thousand and $194 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The estimated intangible asset amortization expense for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010,
and for the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):
Estimated | ||
Fiscal Year Ended | Amortization | |
December 31, | Expense | |
2010
|
$240 | |
2011 | $240 | |
2012 | $240 | |
2013 | $240 | |
2014 | $240 | |
2015 | $240 |
8
Table of Contents
10. Debt
Debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revolving credit facilities bore interest at a weighted
average of 7.4% as of June 30, 2010 and 6.2% as of December 31,
2009 |
$ | | $ | | ||||
8.0% senior notes due July 1, 2013 |
97,810 | 97,810 | ||||||
15% second lien term loan due November 1, 2012 ($16,800
principal amount, net of $3,639 and $4,150, respectively, of
original issue discount) |
13,161 | 12,650 | ||||||
11%/13% third lien senior secured notes due February 15, 2013
($42,124 principal
amount and $6,654 and $7,797, respectively, of issuance premium) |
48,778 | 49,921 | ||||||
Paid-in-kind interest on 11%/13% third lien senior secured
notes due February 15, 2013 |
5,016 | 2,263 | ||||||
$ | 164,765 | $ | 162,644 | |||||
On January 7, 2009, we and certain of our direct and indirect U.S. subsidiaries, as borrowers (the
borrowers), entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as agent and
lender, which provides for a three-year asset-based revolving credit facility with an aggregate
principal amount of up to $37.5 million (after giving effect to a second amendment to our Loan and
Security Agreement entered into on August 4, 2009), which is subject to an availability block of
$10.0 million, until we deliver a compliance certificate for any fiscal quarter ending March 31,
2010 or thereafter demonstrating a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0 for the most
recent four fiscal quarters, at which time the availability block will be $7.5 million at all times
while the fixed charge coverage ratio is at least 1.1 to 1.0 and certain borrowing base limitations
are met. Up to an aggregate of $10.0 million is available to the borrowers for the issuance of
letters of credit, which reduces availability under the revolving credit facility.
As of June 30, 2010, we did not have borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement. In
addition, as of June 30, 2010, we had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $1.7 million
and borrowing availability of $35.8 million under the Loan and Security Agreement, which is subject
to a $10.0 million availability block.
Our Loan and Security Agreement contains financial covenants, including a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio, if we do not maintain certain availability requirements. Because we had borrowing
availability in excess of $5.0 million (after giving effect to the $10.0 million availability
block) from April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010, we were not required to comply with the minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio covenant during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Under the Loan and Security Agreement, borrowings bear interest at various rates plus a margin
based on certain financial ratios. The borrowers obligations under the Loan and Security
Agreement are secured by a first-priority lien (subject to certain permitted liens) on
substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of the borrowers, as well as 100% of the
capital stock of the direct domestic subsidiaries of each borrower and 65% of the capital stock of
each foreign subsidiary directly owned by a borrower. Each of CVG and each other borrower is
jointly and severally liable for the obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement and
unconditionally guarantees the prompt payment and performance thereof.
We entered into a loan and security agreement (the Second Lien Credit Agreement), providing for a
term loan (the second lien term loan), on August 4, 2009. We issued the 11%/13% third lien
senior secured notes due 2013 (the third lien notes) pursuant to an indenture, dated as of
August 4, 2009 (the Third Lien Notes Indenture), by and among CVG, certain of our subsidiaries
party thereto, as guarantors (the guarantors), and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.
The second lien term loan due 2012 and the third lien notes are senior secured obligations of CVG.
The second lien term loan is secured by a second-priority lien, and the third lien notes are
secured by a third-priority lien, on substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of CVG
and certain of its domestic subsidiaries, and a pledge of 100% of the capital stock of certain of
CVGs domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of each foreign subsidiary owned directly
by a domestic subsidiary. The second lien term loan and the third lien notes are guaranteed by
certain of CVGs domestic subsidiaries.
The second lien term loan bears interest at the fixed per annum rate of 15% until it matures on
November 1, 2012. During an event of default, if the required lenders so elect, the interest rate
applied to any outstanding obligations will be equal to the otherwise applicable rate plus 2.0%.
Interest on our third lien notes is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year until their
maturity date of February 15, 2013. We paid interest entirely in pay-in-kind interest (PIK
interest), by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the third lien notes, on the first
interest payment date on February 15, 2010, at an annual rate of 13.0%. We have elected to pay our
August 15, 2010 interest as PIK interest, at an annual rate of 13.0%. We may, at our option, elect
to pay interest in cash at an annual rate of 11.0%, or PIK interest, at an annual rate of
9
Table of Contents
13.0% on
the interest payment date of February 15, 2011. After February 15, 2011, we will be required to
make all interest payments entirely in cash, at an annual rate of 11.0%.
The 8.0% senior notes due 2013 are senior unsecured obligations and rank pari passu in right of
payment to all of our existing and future senior indebtedness and are effectively subordinated to
our existing and future secured obligations. The 8.0% senior notes are guaranteed by certain of
our domestic subsidiaries. The 8% senior notes due 2013 bear interest paid semi-annually on
January 1 and July 1 at a fixed per annum rate of 8% until the maturity date of July 1, 2013.
11. Income Taxes
We, or one of our subsidiaries, file federal income tax returns in the United States and income tax
returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject
to income tax examinations by any of the taxing authorities for years before 2004. There are
currently no income tax examinations in process.
As of June 30, 2010, we have provided a liability of approximately $0.6 million of unrecognized tax
benefits related to various federal and state income tax positions, which would impact our
effective tax rate if recognized.
We accrue penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits through income tax expense,
which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods. We had
approximately $237 thousand accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at June 30, 2010, of
which $11 thousand was accrued during the current year. Accrued interest and penalties are
included in the $0.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits.
During the current quarter, we released $1.7 million of tax reserves associated with items falling
outside the statue of limitations and the closure of certain tax years for examination purposes.
We anticipate events could occur within the next 12 months that would have an impact on the amount
of unrecognized tax benefits that would be required. Approximately $86 thousand of unrecognized
tax benefits relate to items that are affected by expiring statutes of limitation within the next
12 months.
As a result of federal legislation passed in 2009 that allows tax losses to be carried back for a
period of five years, on April 29, 2010, we received a tax refund of approximately $21.4 million.
We anticipate receiving a tax refund of approximately $1.8 million related to the settlement of tax
examinations in the third quarter of 2010.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Warranty We are subject to warranty claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to require their outside suppliers to
guarantee or warrant their products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such products.
Depending on the terms under which we supply products to our customers, a customer may hold us
responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective products when the
product supplied did not perform as represented. Our policy is to reserve for estimated future
customer warranty costs based on historical trends and current economic factors. The following
represents a summary of the warranty provision for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (in
thousands):
Balance December 31, 2009 |
$ | 3,066 | ||
Additional provisions recorded |
513 | |||
Deduction for payments made |
(812 | ) | ||
Currency translation adjustment |
(12 | ) | ||
Balance June 30, 2010 |
$ | 2,755 | ||
Leases We lease office and manufacturing space and certain equipment under non-cancelable
operating lease agreements that require us to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes and other expenses
in addition to annual rents. As of June 30, 2010, our equipment leases did not provide for any
material guarantee of a specified portion of residual values.
Guarantees We accrue for costs associated with guarantees when it is probable that a liability
has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The most likely cost to be incurred
is accrued based on an evaluation of currently available facts, and where no amount within a range
of estimates is more likely, the minimum is accrued. In accordance with accounting guidance for
guarantees issued after December 31, 2002, we record a liability for the fair value of such
guarantees in the balance sheet. As of June 30, 2010, we had no such guarantees.
10
Table of Contents
Litigation We are subject to various legal actions and claims incidental to our business,
including those arising out of alleged defects, product warranties, employment-related matters and
environmental matters. Management believes that we maintain adequate insurance to cover these
claims. We have established reserves for issues that are probable and estimatable in amounts
management believes are adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered by insurance.
Based upon the information available to management and discussions with legal counsel, it is the
opinion of management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal actions and claims that are
incidental to our business will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows; however, such matters are subject to many
uncertainties, and the outcomes of individual matters are not predictable with assurance.
13. Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
We use forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of the foreign currency transaction exposures
primarily related to our United Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations and will hedge a portion or all of the
anticipated long or short position. As of June 30, 2010, none of our derivatives were designated
as hedging instruments; therefore, our forward foreign exchange contracts have been
marked-to-market and the fair value of contracts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets with
the offsetting non-cash gain or loss recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. We do
not hold or issue foreign exchange options or forward contracts for trading purposes.
The following table summarizes the notional amount of our open foreign exchange contracts (in
thousands):
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. | U.S. | |||||||||||||||
U.S. $ | Equivalent | U.S. $ | Equivalent | |||||||||||||
Equivalent | Fair Value | Equivalent | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Commitments to buy currencies: |
||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen |
$ | | $ | | $ | (345 | ) | $ | (338 | ) | ||||||
Commitments to sell currencies: |
||||||||||||||||
Euro |
$ | 4,070 | $ | 4,622 | $ | 12,809 | $ | 15,095 | ||||||||
Swedish Krona |
72 | 72 | | | ||||||||||||
Japanese Yen |
3,168 | 4,595 | 8,004 | 10,045 | ||||||||||||
$ | 7,310 | $ | 9,289 | $ | 20,813 | $ | 25,140 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,310 | $ | 9,289 | $ | 20,468 | $ | 24,802 | ||||||||
The fair value of our derivative instruments was a net liability of approximately $2.0 million and
$4.4 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The net liability was
comprised of $2.0 million and $4.4 million in accrued liabilities in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
We consider the impact of our and our counterparties credit risk on the fair value of the
contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a credit valuation adjustment of
approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, on our foreign currency forward
contracts, which is included in other income on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the consolidated balance sheets
for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments (in thousands):
11
Table of Contents
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Fair | Balance Sheet | Fair | |||||||||||||
Location | Value | Location | Value | |||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other assets | $ | | Other assets | $ | 66 | ||||||||||
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Fair | Balance Sheet | Fair | |||||||||||||
Location | Value | Location | Value | |||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Accrued liabilities | $ | 1,980 | Accrued liabilities | $ | 4,400 |
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements
of operations for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recognized in | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income on | Amount of Gain Recognized in | Amount of Gain Recognized in | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | Income on Derivatives | Income on Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other Income | $ | 1,287 | $ | 3,492 | $ | 2,355 | $ | 8,350 |
14. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
We sponsor pension and other post-retirement benefit plans that cover certain hourly and salaried
employees in the United States and United Kingdom. Our policy is to make annual contributions to
the plans to fund the normal cost as required by local regulations. In addition, we have a
post-retirement benefit plan for certain U.S. operations, retirees and their
dependents.
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to the pension and other post-retirement
benefit plans was as follows (in thousands):
Other Post-Retirement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Pension Plans | Non-U.S. Pension Plans | Benefit Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 66 | $ | 76 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
492 | 479 | 519 | 518 | 29 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(423 | ) | (378 | ) | (395 | ) | (369 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| | | | (25 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Recognized actuarial loss (gain) |
23 | 28 | 89 | 48 | 1 | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
158 | 205 | 213 | 197 | 6 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Special termination benefits |
26 | 35 | | | 68 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net benefit cost |
$ | 184 | $ | 240 | $ | 213 | $ | 197 | $ | 74 | $ | 111 | ||||||||||||
We previously disclosed in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, that
we expect to contribute approximately $1.8 million to our pension plans and $0.6 million to our
other post-retirement benefit plans in 2010. As of
June 30, 2010, approximately $1.1 million of contributions have been made to our pension plans. We
anticipate contributing an additional $1.0 million to our pension plans in 2010 for total estimated
contributions during 2010 of $2.1 million.
15. Comprehensive Loss
We follow the comprehensive income accounting guidance, which established standards for reporting
and display of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income reflects the change
in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and
circumstances from nonowner sources. Comprehensive income represents net income adjusted for
foreign currency translation adjustments and minimum pension liability. In accordance
12
Table of Contents
with the
accounting guidance, we have elected to disclose comprehensive income in stockholders investment.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following as of June 30,
2010 (in thousands):
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
$ | (10,059 | ) | |
Pension liability |
(15,042 | ) | ||
$ | (25,101 | ) | ||
Comprehensive loss was as follows (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,369 | $ | (41,917 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(2,001 | ) | 2,266 | |||||
Pension liability |
241 | | ||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (391 | ) | $ | (39,651 | ) | ||
16. Related Party Transactions
In May 2008, we entered into a freight services arrangement with Group Transportation Services
Holdings, Inc. (GTS), a third party logistics and freight management company. Under this
arrangement, which was approved by our Audit Committee on April 29, 2008, GTS manages a portion of
the Companys freight and logistics program as well as administers its payments to additional third
party freight service providers. In May 2010, GTS merged with Roadrunner Transportation Systems,
Inc. (RRTS) in connection with the initial public offering of RRTS. Scott D. Rued, a member
of our Board of Directors, is Chairman of the Board of RRTS and Chad M. Utrup, our Chief Financial
Officer, was elected to the Board of Directors of RRTS in May 2010. For the six months ended June
30, 2010, we made payments (net of pass through payments to other third party freight service
providers) to GTS/RRTS of approximately $0.3 million for these services.
17. Consolidating Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents balance sheets, statements of
operations and cash flow information related to our business. Each guarantor is a direct or
indirect subsidiary of CVG and has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 8% senior notes and
third lien notes issued by CVG, on a joint and several basis.
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial information of
CVG (the parent company), the guarantor companies and the non-guarantor companies in accordance
with Rule 3-10 under the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation S-X. The financial
information may not necessarily be indicative of results of operations or financial position had
the guarantor companies or non-guarantor companies operated as independent entities. The guarantor
companies and the non-guarantor companies include the consolidated financial results of their
wholly owned subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method. All applicable corporate expenses
have been allocated appropriately among the guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries.
13
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES |
$ | | $ | 108,916 | $ | 43,514 | $ | (10,081 | ) | $ | 142,349 | |||||||||
COST OF REVENUES |
| 95,170 | 39,504 | (10,081 | ) | 124,593 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
| 13,746 | 4,010 | | 17,756 | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
| 10,705 | 2,963 | | 13,668 | |||||||||||||||
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE |
| 60 | | | 60 | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF
CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES |
(1,435 | ) | (93 | ) | | 1,528 | | |||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING COSTS |
| 1,410 | | | 1,410 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Income |
1,435 | 1,664 | 1,047 | (1,528 | ) | 2,618 | ||||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME |
(35 | ) | | (1,246 | ) | | (1,281 | ) | ||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME) |
3,986 | (139 | ) | 60 | | 3,907 | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) Income Before
(Benefit) Provision
for Income Taxes |
(2,516 | ) | 1,803 | 2,233 | (1,528 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||
(BENEFIT) PROVISION FOR
INCOME TAXES |
(3,209 | ) | 1,101 | 1,407 | | (701 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 693 | $ | 702 | $ | 826 | $ | (1,528 | ) | $ | 693 | |||||||||
14
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES |
$ | | $ | 224,891 | $ | 82,787 | $ | (18,922 | ) | $ | 288,756 | |||||||||
COST OF REVENUES |
| 198,132 | 74,898 | (18,922 | ) | 254,108 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
| 26,759 | 7,889 | | 34,648 | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
| 20,983 | 5,896 | | 26,879 | |||||||||||||||
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE |
| 120 | | | 120 | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF
CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES |
(4,717 | ) | (581 | ) | | 5,298 | | |||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING COSTS |
| 1,410 | | | 1,410 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Income |
4,717 | 4,827 | 1,993 | (5,298 | ) | 6,239 | ||||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME |
(35 | ) | | (2,705 | ) | | (2,740 | ) | ||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME) |
8,496 | (157 | ) | 82 | | 8,421 | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) Income Before
(Benefit) Provision
for Income Taxes |
(3,744 | ) | 4,984 | 4,616 | (5,298 | ) | 558 | |||||||||||||
(BENEFIT) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
(5,113 | ) | 2,636 | 1,666 | | (811 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 1,369 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 2,950 | $ | (5,298 | ) | $ | 1,369 | |||||||||
15
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2010
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 44,719 | $ | 23 | $ | 7,629 | $ | | $ | 52,371 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
219 | 51,153 | 23,913 | | 75,285 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivable |
31,167 | 11,104 | | (42,271 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories, net |
| 37,582 | 25,368 | | 62,950 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other, net |
507 | 8,835 | 9,951 | (5,497 | ) | 13,796 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
76,612 | 108,697 | 66,861 | (47,768 | ) | 204,402 | ||||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT, net |
| 51,511 | 4,771 | | 56,282 | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES |
80,877 | 9,537 | | (90,414 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net |
| 3,968 | | | 3,968 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS, net |
3,060 | 9,195 | (1 | ) | | 12,254 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 160,549 | $ | 182,908 | $ | 71,631 | $ | (138,182 | ) | $ | 276,906 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) INVESTMENT |
||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 34,441 | $ | 23,821 | $ | | $ | 58,262 | ||||||||||
Intercompany payable |
| 27,479 | 14,792 | (42,271 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities, other |
5,049 | 24,829 | 10,495 | (5,433 | ) | 34,940 | ||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
5,049 | 86,749 | 49,108 | (47,704 | ) | 93,202 | ||||||||||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, net |
164,765 | | | | 164,765 | |||||||||||||||
PENSION AND OTHER
POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS |
| 13,806 | 11,604 | | 25,410 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
1,113 | 935 | 1,923 | (64 | ) | 3,907 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
170,927 | 101,490 | 62,635 | (47,768 | ) | 287,284 | ||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT)
INVESTMENT |
(10,378 | ) | 81,418 | 8,996 | (90,414 | ) | (10,378 | ) | ||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
$ | 160,549 | $ | 182,908 | $ | 71,631 | $ | (138,182 | ) | $ | 276,906 | |||||||||
16
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash
provided by
(used in)
operating
activities |
$ | 736 | $ | 20,413 | $ | (1,104 | ) | $ | | $ | 20,045 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of
property, plant
and equipment |
| (2,451 | ) | (319 | ) | | (2,770 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from
disposal/sale of
property plant
and equipment |
| 53 | 12 | | 65 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets and
liabilities |
| 196 | | | 196 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash used
in investing
activities |
| (2,202 | ) | (307 | ) | | (2,509 | ) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from
issuance of
common stock, net |
25,359 | | | | 25,359 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from
issuance of
common stock
under equity
incentive plans |
1,126 | | | | 1,126 | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax
benefit from
equity incentive
plans |
(52 | ) | | | | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in
intercompany
receivables/payables |
17,541 | (18,227 | ) | 686 | | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash
provided by
(used in)
financing
activities |
43,974 | (18,227 | ) | 686 | | 26,433 | ||||||||||||||
EFFECT OF CURRENCY
EXCHANGE RATE
CHANGES ON CASH |
| 1 | (1,123 | ) | | (1,122 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH |
44,710 | (15 | ) | (1,848 | ) | | 42,847 | |||||||||||||
CASH: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of
period |
9 | 38 | 9,477 | | 9,524 | |||||||||||||||
End of period |
$ | 44,719 | $ | 23 | $ | 7,629 | $ | | $ | 52,371 | ||||||||||
17
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES |
$ | 70 | $ | 83,864 | $ | 24,311 | $ | (4,742 | ) | $ | 103,503 | |||||||||
COST OF REVENUES |
| 82,306 | 27,028 | (4,742 | ) | 104,592 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit (Loss) |
70 | 1,558 | (2,717 | ) | | (1,089 | ) | |||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
| 6,913 | 3,453 | | 10,366 | |||||||||||||||
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE |
| 97 | | | 97 | |||||||||||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
| 7,000 | | | 7,000 | |||||||||||||||
LONG-LIVED ASSET |
| | 3,445 | | 3,445 | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES |
21,788 | (46 | ) | | (21,742 | ) | | |||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING COSTS |
| 235 | | | 235 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Loss |
(21,718 | ) | (12,641 | ) | (9,615 | ) | 21,742 | (22,232 | ) | |||||||||||
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME) |
| 3 | (3,508 | ) | | (3,505 | ) | |||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
781 | 2,798 | 87 | | 3,666 | |||||||||||||||
Loss Before Provision for Income Taxes |
(22,499 | ) | (15,442 | ) | (6,194 | ) | 21,742 | (22,393 | ) | |||||||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
14 | | 106 | | 120 | |||||||||||||||
NET LOSS |
$ | (22,513 | ) | $ | (15,442 | ) | $ | (6,300 | ) | $ | 21,742 | $ | (22,513 | ) | ||||||
18
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
REVENUES |
$ | | $ | 173,095 | $ | 48,988 | $ | (10,050 | ) | $ | 212,033 | |||||||||
COST OF REVENUES |
| 174,029 | 52,392 | (10,050 | ) | 216,371 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Loss |
| (934 | ) | (3,404 | ) | | (4,338 | ) | ||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
| 16,752 | 6,957 | | 23,709 | |||||||||||||||
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE |
| 194 | | | 194 | |||||||||||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
| 7,000 | | | 7,000 | |||||||||||||||
LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
| | 3,445 | | 3,445 | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES |
39,229 | (97 | ) | | (39,132 | ) | | |||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING COSTS |
| 853 | 1,094 | | 1,947 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Loss |
(39,229 | ) | (25,636 | ) | (14,900 | ) | 39,132 | (40,633 | ) | |||||||||||
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME) |
| 16 | (8,413 | ) | | (8,397 | ) | |||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE |
587 | 6,595 | 128 | | 7,310 | |||||||||||||||
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT |
795 | | | | 795 | |||||||||||||||
Loss Before Provision for Income Taxes |
(40,611 | ) | (32,247 | ) | (6,615 | ) | 39,132 | (40,341 | ) | |||||||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
1,306 | | 270 | | 1,576 | |||||||||||||||
NET LOSS |
$ | (41,917 | ) | $ | (32,247 | ) | $ | (6,885 | ) | $ | 39,132 | $ | (41,917 | ) | ||||||
19
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
$ | 9 | $ | 38 | $ | 9,477 | $ | | $ | 9,524 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
218 | 57,680 | 16,165 | | 74,063 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivable |
48,709 | 9,853 | | (58,562 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories, net |
| 34,425 | 23,626 | | 58,051 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other, net |
570 | 16,812 | 9,461 | (62 | ) | 26,781 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
49,506 | 118,808 | 58,729 | (58,624 | ) | 168,419 | ||||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net |
| 56,938 | 5,377 | | 62,315 | |||||||||||||||
EQUITY INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES |
76,573 | 8,940 | | (85,513 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net |
| 4,087 | | | 4,087 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS, net |
6,206 | 9,413 | 67 | 2 | 15,688 | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 132,285 | $ | 198,186 | $ | 64,173 | $ | (144,135 | ) | $ | 250,509 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) INVESTMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 42,638 | 17,017 | 2 | 59,657 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payable |
| 44,456 | 14,106 | (58,562 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued liabilities, other |
4,057 | 18,919 | 9,999 | 2 | 32,977 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
4,057 | 106,013 | 41,122 | (58,558 | ) | 92,634 | ||||||||||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, net |
162,644 | | | | 162,644 | |||||||||||||||
PENSION AND OTHER
POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS |
| 14,173 | 12,742 | | 26,915 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
3,349 | 294 | 2,502 | (64 | ) | 6,081 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
170,050 | 120,480 | 56,366 | (58,622 | ) | 288,274 | ||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT)
INVESTMENT |
(37,765 | ) | 77,706 | 7,807 | (85,513 | ) | (37,765 | ) | ||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT)
INVESTMENT |
$ | 132,285 | $ | 198,186 | $ | 64,173 | $ | (144,135 | ) | $ | 250,509 | |||||||||
20
Table of Contents
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Parent | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Companies | Companies | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities |
$ | 4,940 | $ | 18,862 | $ | (5,606 | ) | $ | 108 | $ | 18,304 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
| (2,602 | ) | (575 | ) | | (3,177 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal/sale
of property, plant and
equipment |
| 14 | | | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Other investing activities |
| (1,529 | ) | | | (1,529 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in
investing activities |
| (4,117 | ) | (575 | ) | | (4,692 | ) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Repayment of revolving credit facility |
(191,656 | ) | | | | (191,656 | ) | |||||||||||||
Borrowings under revolving credit facility |
180,240 | | | | 180,240 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
| (61 | ) | (11 | ) | | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in intercompany receivables/payables |
10,034 | (14,679 | ) | 4,753 | (108 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs and other |
(2,669 | ) | | | | (2,669 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities |
(4,051 | ) | (14,740 | ) | 4,742 | (108 | ) | (14,157 | ) | |||||||||||
EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE
RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
2 | (2 | ) | (656 | ) | | (656 | ) | ||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH |
891 | 3 | (2,095 | ) | | (1,201 | ) | |||||||||||||
CASH: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
9 | 47 | 7,254 | | 7,310 | |||||||||||||||
End of period |
$ | 900 | $ | 50 | $ | 5,159 | $ | | $ | 6,109 | ||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
ITEM 2 | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Company Overview
We are a leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions for the global commercial vehicle
market, including the Heavy-duty (Class 8) truck market, the construction, military, bus and
agriculture market and the specialty transportation markets. As a result of our leadership in
cab-related products and systems, we are positioned to benefit from the increased focus of our
customers on cab design and comfort and convenience features to better serve their end-user, the
operator. Our products include static and suspension seat systems, electronic wire harness
assemblies, control and switches, cab structures and components, interior trim systems (including
instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry and floor systems), mirrors and wiper systems
specifically designed for applications in commercial vehicles.
We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry by our ability to manufacture low
volume customized products on a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
believe that we have the number one or two position in several of our major markets and that we are
one of the only suppliers in the North American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete
cab systems, including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats, interior trim, flooring, wire
harnesses, panel assemblies and other structural components. We believe our products are used by a
majority of the North American heavy truck OEMs, which we believe creates an opportunity to
cross-sell our products and offer a fully integrated system solution.
Demand for our heavy truck products is generally dependent on the number of new heavy truck
commercial vehicles manufactured in North America, which in turn is a function of general economic
conditions, interest rates, changes in governmental regulations, consumer spending, fuel costs and
our customers inventory levels and production rates. New heavy truck commercial vehicle demand
has historically been cyclical and is particularly sensitive to the industrial sector of the
economy, which generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage hauled by commercial
vehicles. Production of heavy truck commercial vehicles in North America initially peaked in 1999
and experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak economy, an oversupply of new
and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on heavy truck commercial vehicles and equipment.
Demand for commercial vehicles improved in 2006 due to broad economic recovery in North America,
corresponding growth in the movement of goods, the growing need to replace aging truck fleets and
OEMs received larger than expected preorders in anticipation of the new EPA emissions standards
becoming effective in 2007.
During 2007, the demand for North American Class 8 heavy trucks experienced a downturn as a result
of preorders in 2006 and general weakness in the North American economy and corresponding decline
in the need for commercial vehicles to haul freight tonnage in North America. The demand for new
heavy truck commercial vehicles in 2008 remained close to 2007 levels as weakness in the overall
North American economy continue to impact production related orders. The overall weakness in the
North American economy and credit markets continued to put pressure on the demand for new vehicles
in 2009 as reflected in the 42% decline of North American
Class 8 production levels from 2008. We
believe this general weakness has contributed to the reluctance of trucking companies to invest in
new truck fleets. In addition, the tightening of credit in financial markets may continue to
adversely affect the ability of our customers to obtain financing for significant truck orders. If
there is a sustained downturn in the economy or disruption in the financial markets, we expect that
low demand for Class 8 trucks could continue to have a negative impact on our revenues, operating
results and financial position.
Demand for our construction products is also dependent on the overall vehicle demand for new
commercial vehicles in the global construction equipment market and generally follows certain
economic conditions around the world. Within the construction market, there are two classes of
construction equipment, the medium/heavy equipment market (weighing over 12 metric tons) and the
light construction equipment market (weighing below 12 metric tons). Demand in the medium/heavy
construction equipment market is typically related to the level of larger scale infrastructure
development projects such as highways, dams, harbors, hospitals, airports and industrial
development as well as activity in the mining, forestry and other raw material based industries.
Demand in the light construction equipment market is typically related to certain economic
conditions such as the level of housing construction and other smaller-scale developments and
projects. Our products are primarily used in the medium/heavy construction equipment markets. If
there is a sustained downturn in the global economy or disruption in the financial markets, we
expect that low demand for construction equipment could have a negative impact on our revenues,
operating results and financial position.
Along with the United States, we have operations in Europe, China, Australia and Mexico. Our
operating results are, therefore, impacted by exchange rate fluctuations to the extent we translate
our foreign operations from their local
22
Table of Contents
currencies into U.S. dollars.
We continuously seek ways to improve our operating performance by lowering costs. These efforts
include, but are not limited to, the following:
| adjusting our hourly and salaried workforce to optimize costs in line with our production levels; | ||
| sourcing efforts in Europe and Asia; | ||
| consolidating our supply base to improve purchasing leverage; | ||
| eliminating excess production capacity through the closure and consolidation of manufacturing, warehousing or assembly facilities; and | ||
| implementing Lean Manufacturing and Total Quality Production System (TQPS) initiatives to improve operating efficiency and product quality. |
Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with new vehicle production, we also
have the opportunity to grow through increasing our product content per vehicle through cross
selling and bundling of products. We generally compete for new business at the beginning of the
development of a new vehicle platform and upon the redesign of existing programs. New platform
development generally begins at least one to three years before the marketing of such models by our
customers. Contract durations for commercial vehicle products generally extend for the entire life
of the platform, which is typically five to seven years.
In sourcing products for a specific platform, the customer generally develops a proposed production
timetable, including current volume and option mix estimates based on their own assumptions, and
then sources business with the supplier pursuant to written contracts, purchase orders or other
firm commitments in terms of price, quality, technology and delivery. In general, these contracts,
purchase orders and commitments provide that the customer can terminate if a supplier does not meet
specified quality and delivery requirements and, in many cases, they provide that the price will
decrease over the proposed production timetable. Awarded business generally covers the supply of
all or a portion of a customers production and service requirements for a particular product
program rather than the supply of a specific quantity of products. Accordingly, in estimating
awarded business over the life of a contract or other commitment, a supplier must make various
assumptions as to the estimated number of vehicles expected to be produced, the timing of that
production, mix of options on the vehicles produced and pricing of the products being supplied.
The actual production volumes and option mix of vehicles produced by customers depend on a number
of factors that are beyond a suppliers control.
Results of Operations
The table below sets forth certain operating data expressed as a percentage of revenues for the
three and six month periods indicated:
23
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenues |
87.5 | 101.1 | 88.0 | 102.0 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit (loss) |
12.5 | (1.1 | ) | 12.0 | (2.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
9.6 | 10.0 | 9.3 | 11.2 | ||||||||||||
Amortization expense |
| 0.1 | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Intangible asset impairment |
| 6.8 | | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
| 3.3 | | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring costs |
1.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1.9 | (21.5 | ) | 2.2 | (19.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income |
(0.9 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (4.0 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
2.7 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
| | | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
0.1 | (21.6 | ) | 0.2 | (18.9 | ) | ||||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(0.5 | ) | 0.1 | (0.3 | ) | 0.7 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
0.6 | % | (21.7) | % | 0.5 | % | (19.6) | % |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues increased approximately $38.8 million, or 37.5%, to $142.3 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2010 from $103.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009. This
increase resulted primarily from an increase in our heavy truck, construction and military markets.
Our North American end market revenues increased by approximately $20.7 million, including a 42.1%
improvement in the North American class 8 heavy truck production. In addition, our European and
Asian end markets increased by approximately $19.2 million primarily as a result of a general
improvement in production levels of our global construction market. Translation of our foreign
operations into U.S. dollars decreased our revenues by approximately $1.1 million over the prior
year period.
Gross Profit (Loss). Gross profit was approximately $17.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to gross loss of $1.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009, an
increase of approximately $18.9 million. This increase was primarily the result of our cost
reduction efforts from the prior year period as well as the impact of the increased revenues
discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit was 12.5% for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to gross loss of 1.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased approximately $3.3 million to $13.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010 from
$10.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily the result of
increased wages and compensation from the cost reduction efforts instituted during 2009 and
increased travel and other expenses to support our new business initiatives.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense was approximately $0.1 million, respectively, for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009.
Intangible Asset Impairment. Our intangible asset impairment analysis is performed annually during
the second quarter. In connection with this test in the three months ended June 30, 2009, we
determined that the fair value was less than the carrying value of our net assets and resulted in
the recording of an impairment charge of approximately $7.0 million for the three months ended June
30, 2009. We did not record an intangible asset impairment for the three months ended June 30,
2010.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment. We identified that an impairment indicator existed for the three
months ended June 30, 2009. As a result, we recorded an impairment of approximately $3.4 million
as the carrying value of the assets exceeded their fair value. We did not record a long-lived
asset impairment for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Restructuring Costs. We recorded restructuring charges for the three months ended June 30, 2010 of
$1.4 million relating to the closure of our Norwalk, Ohio facility as a result of Navistars
decision to in-source its cab assembly operation to Mexico. We recorded restructuring charges for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 of $0.2 million relating to the reduction in our workforce and
the closure of certain manufacturing, warehousing and assembly facilities.
24
Table of Contents
Other Income. We use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures
related primarily to our United Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations and will hedge a portion or all of the
anticipated long or short position. As of June 30, 2010, none of our derivatives were designated
as hedging instruments; therefore, our forward foreign exchange contracts have been
marked-to-market and the fair value of contracts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets with
the offsetting non-cash gain or loss recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. We
recorded other income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 of $1.3 million and $3.5
million, respectively, which is primarily related to the noncash change in value of the forward
exchange contracts in existence at the end of each period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased approximately $0.2 million to $3.9 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2010 from $3.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009. This
increase was primarily due to higher average interest rate on our second lien term loan and third
lien notes.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes. An income tax benefit of approximately $0.7 million was
recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to an income tax provision of
approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The change in income tax from
the prior year quarter can be primarily attributed to changes in tax reserves, geographic tax rates
and profitability and to valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets.
Net Income (Loss). Net income was $0.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to a net loss of $22.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009, primarily as a
result of the factors discussed above.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues increased approximately $76.8 million, or 36.2%, to $288.8 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2010 from $212.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. This
increase resulted primarily from an increase in our heavy truck, construction and military markets.
Our North American end market revenues increased by approximately $44.6 million, including a 31.8%
improvement in the North American class 8 heavy truck production. In addition, our European and
Asian end markets increased by approximately $30.0 million primarily as a result of a general
improvement in production levels of our global construction market. Translation of our foreign
operations into U.S. dollars increased our revenues by approximately $2.1 million over the prior
year period.
Gross Profit (Loss). Gross profit was approximately $34.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to a gross loss of $4.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009, an
increase of approximately $38.9 million. This increase was primarily the result of our cost
reductions efforts from the prior year period as well as the impact of the increased revenues
discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit was 12.0% for the six months ended June
30, 2010 compared to gross loss of 2.0% in the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased approximately $3.2 million to $26.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 from
$23.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily the result of
increased wages and compensation from the cost reduction efforts instituted during 2009 and
increased travel and other expenses to support our new business initiatives.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense was approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Intangible Asset Impairment. Our intangible asset impairment analysis is performed annually during
the second quarter. In connection with this test, we determined that the fair value was less than
the carrying value of our net assets and resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of
approximately $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We did not record an intangible
asset impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment. We identified that an impairment indicator existed for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. As a result, we recorded an impairment of approximately $3.4 million as the
carrying value of the assets exceeded their fair value. We did not record a long-lived asset
impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Restructuring Costs. We recorded restructuring charges for the six months ended June 30, 2010 of
$1.4 million relating to the closure of our Norwalk, Ohio facility as a result of Navistars
decision to in-source its cab assembly operation to Mexico. We recorded restructuring charges for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 of $1.9 million relating to the reduction in our workforce and
the closure of certain manufacturing, warehousing and assembly facilities.
25
Table of Contents
Other Income. We use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures
related primarily to our United Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations and will hedge a portion or all of the
anticipated long or short position. As of June 30, 2010, none of our derivatives were designated
as hedging instruments; therefore, our forward foreign exchange contracts have been
marked-to-market and the fair value of contracts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets with
the offsetting non-cash gain or loss recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. The
other income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 of $2.7 million and $8.4 million,
respectively, is primarily related to the noncash change in value of the forward exchange contracts
in existence at the end of each period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased approximately $1.1 million to $8.4 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2010 from $7.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase
was primarily due to higher average interest rate on our second lien term loan and third lien
notes.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. In connection with entering into our Loan and Security
Agreement on January 7, 2009, we expensed approximately $0.8 million of fees relating to the prior
senior credit agreement for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes. We recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $0.8
million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to an income tax provision of approximately
$1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The change in income tax from the prior year
period can be primarily attributed to changes in tax reserves, geographic tax rates and
profitability and to valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets.
Net Income (Loss). Net income was $1.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to a net loss of $41.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily as a
result of the factors discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by operations was approximately $20.0
million compared to $18.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The net cash provided by
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was primarily a result of the tax refund of
approximately $21.4 million, which we received on April 29, 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $2.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to approximately $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
amounts used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily reflect
capital expenditure purchases.
Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $26.4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to net cash used of approximately $14.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. The net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June
30, 2010 is primarily related to the proceeds of our public offering of common stock.
Debt and Credit Facilities
As of June 30, 2010, we had an aggregate of $164.8 million of outstanding indebtedness excluding
$1.7 million of outstanding letters of credit under various financing arrangements and an
additional $35.8 million of borrowing capacity under our Loan and Security Agreement, which is
subject to a $10.0 million availability block. The indebtedness consisted of the following:
| $97.8 million of 8.0% senior notes due 2013; | ||
| $13.2 million ($16.8 million principal amount, net of $3.6 million of original issue discount) of 15% second lien term loan due 2012; | ||
| $48.8 million ($42.1 million principal amount, and $6.7 million of issuance premium) of 11%/13% third lien secured notes due 2013; and | ||
| $5.0 million of paid-in-kind interest on the 11%/13% third lien secured notes due 2013. |
26
Table of Contents
Credit Agreement On January 7, 2009, we and certain of our direct and indirect U.S. subsidiaries,
as borrowers (the borrowers), entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan and Security
Agreement) with Bank of America, N.A., as agent and lender, which, as amended, provides for a
three-year asset-based revolving credit facility with an aggregate principal amount of up to $37.5
million (after giving effect to a second amendment to our Loan and Security Agreement entered into
on August 4, 2009), which is subject to an availability block of $10.0 million, until we deliver a
compliance certificate for any fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010 or thereafter demonstrating a
fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0 for the most recent four fiscal quarters, at
which time the availability block will be $7.5 million at all times while the fixed charge coverage
ratio is at least 1.1 to 1.0 and certain borrowing base limitations are met. Up to an aggregate of
$10.0 million is available to the borrowers for the issuance of letters of credit, which reduces
availability under the revolving credit facility.
As of June 30, 2010, approximately $3.1 million in deferred fees relating to the Loan and Security
Agreement, our 8.0% senior notes due 2013 and our 11%/13% third lien senior secured notes due 2013
were outstanding and were being amortized over the life of the agreements.
As of June 30, 2010, we did not have borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement. In
addition, as of June 30, 2010, we had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $1.7 million
and borrowing availability of $35.8 million under the Loan and Security Agreement, which is subject
to a $10.0 million availability block.
Terms, Covenants and Compliance Status We are not required to comply with the fixed charge
coverage ratio requirement for as long as we maintain at least $5.0 million of borrowing
availability (after giving effect to the $10.0 million availability block) under the Loan and
Security Agreement. If borrowing availability (after giving effect to the $10.0 million
availability block) is less than $5.0 million for three consecutive business days or less than $2.5
million on any day, we would have been required to comply with a fixed charge coverage ratio of
1.0:1.0 for fiscal quarters ending on or after June 30, 2010, and will be required to continue to
comply with these requirements until we have borrowing availability (after giving effect to the
$10.0 million availability block) of $5.0 million or greater for 60 consecutive days.
Because we had borrowing availability in excess of $5.0 million (after giving effect to the $10.0
million availability block) during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we were not required to comply
with the fixed charge coverage during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
The Loan and Security Agreement also contains other customary restrictive covenants, including,
without limitation: limitations on the ability of the borrowers and their subsidiaries to incur
additional debt and guarantees; grant liens on assets; pay dividends or make other distributions;
make investments or acquisitions; dispose of assets; make payments on certain indebtedness; merge,
combine with any other person or liquidate; amend organizational documents; file consolidated tax
returns with entities other than other borrowers or their subsidiaries; make material changes in
accounting treatment or reporting practices; enter into restrictive agreements; enter into hedging
agreements; engage in transactions with affiliates; enter into certain employee benefit plans; and
amend subordinated debt or the indentures governing the third lien notes and the 8% senior notes
due 2013. In addition, the Loan and Security Agreement contains customary reporting and other
affirmative covenants. We were in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2010.
Under the Loan and Security Agreement, borrowings bear interest at various rates plus a margin
based on certain financial ratios. The borrowers obligations under the Loan and Security
Agreement are secured by a first-priority lien (subject to certain permitted liens) on
substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of the borrowers, as well as 100% of the
capital stock of the direct domestic subsidiaries of each borrower and 65% of the capital stock of
each foreign subsidiary directly owned by a borrower. Each of CVG and each other borrower is
jointly and severally liable for the obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement and
unconditionally guarantees the prompt payment and performance thereof.
Second Lien Credit Agreement. Concurrently with the notes exchange described below, on August 4,
2009, CVG and certain of its domestic subsidiaries entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the
Second Lien Credit Agreement) with Credit Suisse, as agent, and certain financial institutions,
as lenders, providing for a term loan (the second lien term loan) in principal amount of $16.8
million. The second lien term loan bears interest at the fixed per annum rate of 15% until it
matures on November 1, 2012. During an event of default, if the required lenders so elect, the
interest rate applied to any outstanding obligations will be equal to the otherwise applicable rate
plus 2.0%.
The Second Lien Credit Agreement provides that the second lien term loan is a senior secured
obligation of CVG. CVGs obligations under the Second Lien Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the
guarantors. The obligations of CVG and the
27
Table of Contents
guarantors under the Second Lien Credit Agreement are secured by a second-priority lien on
substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of CVG and certain of its domestic
subsidiaries, and a pledge of 100% of the capital stock of certain of CVGs domestic subsidiaries
and 65% of the capital stock of each foreign subsidiary directly owned by a domestic subsidiary.
The liens, the security interests and all of the obligations of CVG and the guarantors and all
provisions regarding remedies in an event of default are subject to an intercreditor agreement
among the agent under the Loan and Security Agreement, the agent under the Second Lien Credit
Agreement and the collateral agent for the third lien notes, and an intercreditor agreement among
the collateral agent for the Second Lien Credit Agreement and the collateral agent for the third
lien notes (the Intercreditor Agreements).
Exchange of 8% Senior Notes due 2013 for Units consisting of 11%/13% Third Lien Senior Secured
Notes due 2013 and Warrants. On August 4, 2009, we announced a private exchange with certain
holders of our 8% senior notes due 2013 (the 8% senior notes) pursuant to an exchange agreement,
dated as of August 4, 2009, by and between us, certain of our subsidiaries and the exchanging
noteholders named therein. Pursuant to the exchange agreement, we exchanged approximately $52.2
million in aggregate principal amount of the 8% senior notes for units consisting of (i)
approximately $42.1 million in aggregate principal amount of our new 11%/13% Third Lien Senior
Secured Notes due 2013 (the third lien notes) and (ii) warrants to purchase 745,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $0.35. The third lien notes were issued pursuant to an
indenture, dated as of August 4, 2009 (the Third Lien Notes Indenture), by and among CVG, certain
of our subsidiaries party thereto, as guarantors (the guarantors), and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee.
11%/13% Third Lien Senior Secured Notes due 2013. The third lien notes were issued under the Third
Lien Notes Indenture. Interest is payable on the third lien notes on February 15 and August 15 of
each year until their maturity date of February 15, 2013. We paid interest entirely in pay-in-kind
interest (PIK interest), by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the third lien notes,
on the first interest payment date on February 15, 2010, at an annual rate of 13.0%. We have
elected to pay our August 15, 2010 interest as PIK interest, at an annual rate of 13.0%. We may,
at our option, elect to pay interest in cash at an annual rate of 11.0%, or PIK interest, at an
annual rate of 13.0% on the interest payment date of February 15, 2011. After February 15, 2011,
we will be required to make all interest payments entirely in cash, at an annual rate of 11.0%.
The Third Lien Notes Indenture provides that the third lien notes are senior secured obligations of
CVG. Our obligations under the third lien notes are guaranteed by the guarantors. The obligations
of CVG and the guarantors under the third lien notes are secured by a third-priority lien on
substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of CVG and its domestic subsidiaries, and a
pledge of 100% of the capital stock of certain of CVGs domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the
capital stock of each foreign subsidiary directly owned by a domestic subsidiary. The liens, the
security interests and all obligations of CVG and the guarantors are subject in all respects to the
terms, provisions, conditions and limitations of the Intercreditor Agreements.
8% Senior Notes due 2013 - The 8.0% senior notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank pari
passu in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior indebtedness and are effectively
subordinated to our existing and future secured obligations. The 8.0% senior notes are guaranteed
by certain of our domestic subsidiaries.
Covenants and Liquidity
We continue to operate in a challenging economic environment, and our ability to comply with the
covenants in the Loan and Security Agreement may be affected in the future by economic or business
conditions beyond our control. Based on our current forecast, we believe that we will be able to
maintain compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant or the minimum availability
requirement, if applicable, and other covenants in the Loan and Security Agreement for the next
twelve months; however, no assurances can be given that we will be able to comply. We base our
forecasts on historical experience, industry forecasts and various other assumptions that we
believe are reasonable under the circumstances. If actual results are substantially different than
our current forecast, or if we do not realize a significant portion of our planned cost savings or
sustain sufficient cash or borrowing availability, we could be required to comply with our
financial covenants, and there is no assurance that we would be able to comply with such financial
covenants. If we do not comply with the financial and other covenants in the Loan and Security
Agreement, and we are unable to obtain necessary waivers or amendments from the lender, we would be
precluded from borrowing under the Loan and Security Agreement, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and liquidity. If we are unable to borrow under the
Loan and Security Agreement, we will need to meet our capital requirements using other sources and
alternative sources of liquidity may not be available on acceptable terms. In addition, if we do
not comply with the financial and other covenants in the Loan and Security Agreement, the lender
could declare an event of default
28
Table of Contents
under the Loan and Security Agreement, and our indebtedness thereunder could be declared
immediately due and payable, which would also result in an event of default under the second lien
term loan, the third lien notes and the 8% senior notes. Any of these events would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and liquidity.
We believe that cash on hand, cash flow from operating activities together with available
borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement will be sufficient to fund currently anticipated
working capital, planned capital spending and debt service requirements for at least the next 12
months. No assurance can be given, however, that this will be the case.
Update on Contractual Obligations
At June 30, 2010, we have provided a liability for $0.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits
related to various income tax positions. We do not expect a significant tax payment related to
these obligations within the next year.
Forward-Looking Statements
All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q, including
without limitation the statements under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. When used in this Form 10-Q, the words anticipate, believe, estimate,
expect, intend, plan and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of our
management as well as on assumptions made by and information currently available to us at the time
such statements were made. Various economic and competitive factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements, including factors which
are outside of our control, such as risks relating to: (i) general economic or business conditions
affecting the markets in which we serve; (ii) our ability to develop or successfully introduce new
products; (iii) risks associated with conducting business in foreign countries and currencies; (iv)
increased competition in the heavy-duty truck or construction market; (v) our failure to complete
or successfully integrate additional strategic acquisitions; (vi) the impact of changes in
governmental regulations on our customers or on our business; (vii) the loss of business from a
major customer or the discontinuation of particular commercial vehicle platforms; (viii) our
ability to obtain future financing due to changes in the lending markets or our financial position;
(ix) our ability to comply with the financial covenants in our revolving credit facility; and (x)
various other risks as outlined under the heading Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by such cautionary statements.
ITEM 3 | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
There have been no material changes to our exposure to market risk since December 31, 2009.
ITEM 4 | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our senior management is responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive officer
or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report,
with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other
key members of our management. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June
30, 2010.
29
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control
over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2010 that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls. Our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal
control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. The design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error
or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Controls also can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or
more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is
based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject
to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
30
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings: |
From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise in the
ordinary course of our business. We do not have any material litigation at this time.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors: |
There have been no material changes to our risk factors as disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on March 12,
2010.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds: |
On August 4, 2009, we entered into an agreement with certain holders of our 8% senior notes due
2013 to exchange approximately $52.2 million in aggregate principal amount of the 8% senior notes
due 2013 held by such holders for 42,124 units, consisting of $42.1 million in aggregate principal
amount of 11% / 13% Third Lien Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and 745,000 warrants, in a transaction
that was not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). The
units and warrants were issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
Each unit is immediately separable into $1,000 principal amount of third lien notes and 17.68588
warrants. Each warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of our common stock at an
exercise price of $0.35 per share. The warrants provide for mandatory cashless exercise and are
exercisable at any time on or after separation and prior to their expiration on August 4, 2019.
We issued the following shares of common stock upon the exercise of certain of the warrants during
the quarter ended June 30, 2010:
Date Exercised | Shares Issued | |||
April 1, 2010
|
40,378 | |||
April 23, 2010
|
10,686 |
The warrants were exercised on a cashless exercise basis as required under the warrant and unit
agreement, and, accordingly, such shares of Common Stock were issued in reliance upon the exemption
from registration set forth in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
31
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits: |
31.1
|
Certification by Mervin Dunn, President and Chief Executive Officer. | |
31.2
|
Certification by Chad M. Utrup, Chief Financial Officer. | |
32.1
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. |
||||
Date: August 9, 2010 | By: | /s/ Chad M. Utrup | ||
Chad M. Utrup | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial and accounting officer and duly authorized officer) |
||||
33