COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP INC /KY/ - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
[X]
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
Or
|
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
|
For
the transition period from _____________ to
_____________
|
|
Commission
file number 0-11129
COMMUNITY
TRUST BANCORP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky
|
61-0979818
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
IRS
Employer Identification No.
|
346
North Mayo Trail
Pikeville,
Kentucky
(address
of principal executive offices)
|
41501
(Zip
Code)
|
(606)
432-1414
(Registrant’s
telephone number)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common
Stock, $5.00 par value
(Title
of Class)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act.
Yes
|
No
ü
|
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d) of the Act.
Yes
|
No
ü
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes ü
|
No
|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated
filer,” “large accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
Accelerated
filer ü
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
Yes
|
No
ü
|
Based upon the closing price of the
Common Shares of the Registrant on the NASDAQ-Stock Market LLC – Global Select
Market, the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant as of June 30, 2007 was $456.1 million. For the purpose of
the foregoing calculation only, all directors and executive officers of the
Registrant have been deemed affiliates. The number of shares
outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of February 29, 2008 was
14,961,336.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
i
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
14
|
|
14
|
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
|
26
|
|
27
|
|
31
|
|
49
|
|
51
|
|
51
|
|
51
|
|
52
|
|
52
|
|
52
|
|
52
|
|
PART IV | |
53
|
|
54
|
|
56
|
Portions of the following documents are
incorporated by reference into the Form 10-K part indicated:
Document
|
Form 10-K
|
(1) Proxy
statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 22,
2008
|
Part
III
|
i
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”)
is a bank holding company registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System pursuant to Section 5(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
as amended. CTBI was incorporated August 12, 1980, under the laws of
the Commonwealth of Kentucky for the purpose of becoming a bank holding
company. At December 31, 2007, CTBI owned all the capital stock of
one commercial bank and one trust company, serving small and mid-sized
communities in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and
southern West Virginia. The commercial bank is Community Trust Bank,
Inc., Pikeville, Kentucky (the “Bank”) and the trust company is Community Trust
and Investment Company, Lexington, Kentucky (the “Trust Company”). At
December 31, 2007, CTBI had total consolidated assets of $2.9 billion and total
consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $2.5 billion, making
it the second largest bank holding company headquartered in the Commonwealth of
Kentucky.
Through its subsidiaries, CTBI engages
in a wide range of commercial and personal banking and trust activities, which
include accepting time and demand deposits; making secured and unsecured loans
to corporations, individuals and others; providing cash management services to
corporate and individual customers; issuing letters of credit; renting safe
deposit boxes; and providing funds transfer services. The lending
activities of our Bank include making commercial, construction, mortgage, and
personal loans. Lease-financing, lines of credit, revolving lines of
credit, term loans, and other specialized loans, including asset-based
financing, are also available. Our corporate subsidiaries act as
trustees of personal trusts, as executors of estates, as trustees for employee
benefit trusts, as registrars, transfer agents, and paying agents for bond and
stock issues, as depositories for securities, and as providers of full service
brokerage services.
COMPETITION
CTBI’s subsidiaries face substantial
competition for deposit, credit, and trust relationships, as well as other
sources of funding in the communities we serve. Competing providers
include state banks, national banks, thrifts, trust companies, insurance
companies, mortgage banking operations, credit unions, finance companies,
brokerage companies, and other financial and non-financial companies which may
offer products functionally equivalent to those offered by our
subsidiaries. Many of these providers offer services within and
outside the market areas served by our subsidiaries. We strive to
offer competitively priced products along with quality customer service to build
customer relationships in the communities we serve.
Since July 1989, banking legislation in
Kentucky places no limits on the number of banks or bank holding companies that
a bank holding company may acquire. Interstate acquisitions are
allowed where reciprocity exists between the laws of Kentucky and the home state
of the bank or bank holding company to be acquired. Bank holding
companies continue to be limited to control of less than 15% of deposits held by
banks in the states where they do business (exclusive of inter-bank and foreign
deposits).
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the
“GLB Act”) has expanded the permissible activities of a bank holding
company. The GLB Act allows qualifying bank holding companies to
elect to be treated as financial holding companies. A financial
holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature or are
incidental or complementary to financial activities. We have not yet
elected to be treated as a financial holding company. The GLB Act
also eliminated restrictions imposed by the Glass-Steagall Financial Services
Law, adopted in the 1930s, which prevented banking, insurance, and securities
firms from fully entering each other’s business. This legislation has
resulted in further consolidation in the financial services
industry. In addition, removal of these restrictions has increased
the number of entities providing banking services and thereby created additional
competition.
No material portion of our business is
seasonal. We are not dependent upon any one customer or a few
customers, and the loss of any one or a few customers would not have a material
adverse effect on us. See note 18 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information regarding concentrations of
credit.
We do not engage in any operations in
foreign countries.
1
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2007, CTBI and
subsidiaries had 1,011 full-time equivalent employees. Our employees
are provided with a variety of employee benefits. A retirement plan,
an employee stock ownership plan, group life insurance, major medical insurance,
a cafeteria plan, and annual management and employee incentive compensation
plans are available to eligible personnel.
SUPERVISION
AND REGULATION
We, as a registered bank holding
company, are restricted to those activities permissible under the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended, and are subject to actions of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System thereunder. We are required
to file an annual report with the Federal Reserve Board and are subject to an
annual examination by the Board.
Our Bank is a state-chartered bank
subject to state and federal banking laws and regulations and periodic
examination by the Kentucky Office of Financial Institutions and the
restrictions, including dividend restrictions, thereunder. Our Bank
is also a member of the Federal Reserve System and is subject to certain
restrictions imposed by and to examination and supervision under the Federal
Reserve Act. Our Trust Company is also regulated by the Kentucky
Office of Financial Institutions and the Federal Reserve.
Deposits of our Bank are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which subjects banks to regulation and
examination under the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Act.
The operations of CTBI and our
subsidiaries also are affected by other banking legislation and policies and
practices of various regulatory authorities. Such legislation and
policies include statutory maximum rates on some loans, reserve requirements,
domestic monetary and fiscal policy, and limitations on the kinds of services
that may be offered.
CTBI’s annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments
to those reports are available free of charge on our website at www.ctbi.com
as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed
with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. CTBI’s
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available on our
website. Copies of our annual report will be made available free of
charge upon written request.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT
Certain of the statements contained
herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. CTBI’s actual results
may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as
“believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may
fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as
“will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions,
portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including
bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions
including the performance of financial markets, prevailing inflation and
interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset
sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; results of various
investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, changes in
laws and regulations, competition, and demographic changes on target market
populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in
information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of
acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within
the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties;
the adoption by CTBI of a Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
(FFIEC) policy that provides guidance on the reporting of delinquent consumer
loans and the timing of associated credit charge-offs for financial institution
subsidiaries; and the resolution of legal proceedings and related
matters. In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to
various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, which include those
determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, and state regulators, whose policies and regulations could affect
CTBI’s results. These statements are representative only on the date
hereof, and CTBI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements made.
2
Enterprise
Risk Management
Risk is an inherent component of CTBI’s
business activities. The ability to effectively identify, assess,
measure, respond, monitor, and report on risk in our business activities is
critical to the achievement of CTBI’s mission and strategic
objectives. CTBI utilizes an enterprise wide risk management (EWRM)
process designed to provide the Board and management with the capabilities
needed to identify, assess, and manage the full spectrum of risks inherent to
our industry. While business unit managers are primarily responsible
for managing risk inherent in their areas of responsibility, CTBI has
established a risk management governance structure to establish policies,
monitor adherence to the policies, and manage the overall risk profile of the
company. CTBI’s EWRM program is not intended to replace normal risk
management activities conducted by the business unit managers. The
EWRM program is designed to provide a portfolio view of risks across the entire
enterprise.
As an integral part of the risk
management process, management has established various committees consisting of
senior executives and others within CTBI. The purpose of these
committees is to closely monitor risks and ensure that adequate risk management
practices exist within their respective areas of authority. Some of
the principal committees include the Asset/Liability Management (ALCO)
Committee, the Loan Portfolio Risk Management Committee, the Senior Credit
Committee, the Information Technology Steering Committee, and various
compliance-related committees. Overlapping membership of these
committees by senior executives and others helps provide a unified view of risk
on an enterprise-wide basis. To facilitate an enterprise-wide view of
CTBI’s risk profile and coordinate the enterprise risk management governance
process, a Chief Risk Officer has been appointed, who oversees the process and
reports on CTBI’s risk profile. Additionally, risk champions are
assigned for various areas. The risk champions facilitate
implementation of the enterprise risk management and governance process across
the company. An Enterprise Risk Management Committee has been
established consisting of senior executives and others within CTBI, which
oversees and supports the EWRM process. The Board of Directors,
through its Risk and Compliance Committee, has overall responsibility for
oversight of CTBI’s enterprise risk management governance process.
Interest
Rate Risk
Changes
in interest rates could adversely affect our earnings and financial
condition.
Our earnings and financial condition
are dependent to a large degree upon net interest income, which is the
difference between interest earned from loans and investments and interest paid
on deposits and borrowings. The narrowing of interest-rate spreads,
meaning the difference between the interest rates earned on loans and
investments and the interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings, could
adversely affect our earnings and financial condition. Interest rates
are highly sensitive to many factors, including:
·
|
The
rate of inflation;
|
·
|
The
rate of economic growth;
|
·
|
Employment
levels;
|
·
|
Monetary
policies; and
|
·
|
Instability
in domestic and foreign financial
markets.
|
Changes in market interest rates will
also affect the level of voluntary prepayments on our loans and the receipt of
payments on our mortgage-backed securities resulting in the receipt of proceeds
that may be reinvested at a lower rate than the loan or mortgage-backed security
being prepaid.
We originate residential loans for sale
and for our portfolio. The origination of loans for sale is designed to meet
client financing needs and earn fee income. The origination of loans for sale is
highly dependent upon the local real estate market and the level and trend of
interest rates. Increasing interest rates may reduce the origination
of loans for sale and consequently the fee income we earn. While our
commercial banking, construction, and income property business lines remain a
significant portion of our activities, high interest rates may reduce our
mortgage-banking activities and thereby our income. In contrast,
decreasing interest rates have the effect of causing clients to refinance
mortgage loans faster than anticipated. This causes the value of
assets related to the servicing rights on loans sold to be lower than originally
anticipated. If this happens, we may need to write down our servicing
assets faster, which would accelerate our expense and lower our
earnings.
We consider interest rate risk one of
our most significant market risks. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse
changes in net interest income due to changes in interest
rates. Consistency of our net interest revenue is largely dependent
upon the effective management of interest rate risk. We employ a
variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage our interest rate risk
including the use of an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income
sensitivity to changing interest rates. The model is based on actual
cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet
instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of
changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and
liabilities. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit
rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also
incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently
uncertain, and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest
income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net
interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results
due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as
changes in market conditions and management strategies.
Government
Policies
Our
business may be adversely affected by changes in government
policies.
The earnings of banks and bank holding
companies such as ours are affected by the policies of regulatory authorities,
including the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the money
supply. Among the methods employed by the Federal Reserve Board are
open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the discount
rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against
member bank deposits. These methods are used in varying combinations
to influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and
deposits, and their use may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid
on deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have
had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial and savings
banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the
future.
3
The banking industry is highly
regulated and changes in federal and state banking regulations as well as
policies and administration guidelines may affect our practices, growth
prospects, and earnings.
Credit
Risk
Our
earnings and reputation may be adversely affected if we fail to effectively
manage our credit risk.
Originating and underwriting loans are
integral to the success of our business. This business requires us to
take “credit risk,” which is the risk of losing principal and interest income
because borrowers fail to repay loans. Collateral values and the
ability of borrowers to repay their loans may be affected at any time by factors
such as:
·
|
A
downturn in the local economies in which we operate or the national
economy;
|
·
|
A
downturn in one or more of the business sectors in which our customers
operate; or
|
·
|
A
rapid increase in interest rates.
|
Although we do not have a subprime
lending program, the current subprime lending crisis may have an adverse effect
on our residential loan portfolio as proposed legislation may create an
environment that will unreasonably delay the collection of past due amounts and
impede our ability to make new residential loans.
Competition
Strong
competition within our market area may reduce our ability to attract and retain
deposits and originate loans.
We face competition both in originating
loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in the financial services industry
is intense. We compete for clients by offering excellent service and
competitive rates on our loans and deposit products. The type of
institutions we compete with include commercial banks, savings institutions,
mortgage banking firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds,
insurance companies and brokerage and investment banking
firms. Competition arises from institutions located within and
outside our market areas. As a result of their size and ability to
achieve economies of scale, certain of our competitors offer a broader range of
products and services than we offer. In addition, to stay competitive
in our markets we may need to adjust the interest rates on our products to match
the rates offered by our competitors, which could adversely affect our net
interest margin. As a result, our profitability depends upon our
continued ability to successfully compete in our market areas while achieving
our investment objectives.
Economy
Our
business may be adversely affected by downturns in the local economies on which
we depend.
Our loan portfolio is concentrated
primarily in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and
southern West Virginia. Our profits depend on providing products and
services to clients in these local regions. An increase in
unemployment, a decrease in real estate values, or increases in interest rates
could weaken the local economies in which we operate. Weakness in our
market area could depress our earnings and consequently our financial condition
because:
·
|
Clients
may not want or need our products and
services;
|
·
|
Borrowers
may not be able to repay their
loans;
|
·
|
The
value of the collateral securing our loans to borrowers may decline;
and
|
·
|
The
quality of our loan portfolio may
decline.
|
Acquisition
Risk
We
may have difficulty in the future continuing to grow through
acquisitions.
Due to consolidation within the banking
industry, the number of suitable acquisition targets has decreased and there is
intense competition for attractive acquisitions. As a result, we may
experience difficulty in making acquisitions on acceptable terms.
Any future acquisitions or mergers by
CTBI or its banking subsidiary are subject to approval by the appropriate
federal and state banking regulators. The banking regulators evaluate
a number of criteria in making their approval decisions, such as:
·
|
Safety
and soundness guidelines;
|
·
|
Compliance
with all laws including the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the International
Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001, the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations
promulgated under such Act or the Exchange Act, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and all other applicable fair lending laws
and other laws relating to discriminatory business practices;
and
|
·
|
Anti-competitive
concerns with the proposed
transaction.
|
If the banking regulators or a
commenter on our regulatory application raise concerns about any of these
criteria at the time a regulatory application is filed, the banking regulators
may deny, delay, or condition their approval of a proposed
transaction.
We have grown, and intend to continue
to grow, through acquisitions of banks and other financial
institutions. After these acquisitions, we may experience adverse
changes in results of operations of acquired entities, unforeseen liabilities,
asset quality problems of acquired entities, loss of key personnel, loss of
clients because of change of identity, difficulties in integrating data
processing and operational procedures, and deterioration in local economic
conditions. These various acquisition risks can be heightened in
larger transactions.
4
Integration
Risk
We
may not be able to achieve the expected integration and cost savings from our
ongoing bank acquisition activities.
We have a long history of acquiring
financial institutions and we expect this acquisition activity to continue in
the future. Difficulties may arise in the integration of the business
and operations of the financial institutions that agree to merge with and into
CTBI and, as a result, we may not be able to achieve the cost savings and
synergies that we expect will result from the merger
activities. Achieving cost savings is dependent on consolidating
certain operational and functional areas, eliminating duplicative positions and
terminating certain agreements for outside services. Additional
operational savings are dependent upon the integration of the banking businesses
of the acquired financial institution with that of CTBI, including the
conversion of the acquired entity’s core operating systems, data systems and
products to those of CTBI and the standardization of business
practices. Complications or difficulties in the conversion of the
core operating systems, data systems, and products of these other banks to those
of CTBI may result in the loss of clients, damage to our reputation within the
financial services industry, operational problems, one-time costs currently not
anticipated by us, and/or reduced cost savings resulting from the merger
activities.
Operational
Risk
An
extended disruption of vital infrastructure or a security breach could
negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial
condition.
Our operations depend upon, among other
things, our infrastructure, including equipment and
facilities. Extended disruption of vital infrastructure by fire,
power loss, natural disaster, telecommunications failure, computer hacking or
viruses, terrorist activity or the domestic and foreign response to such
activity, or other events outside of our control could have a material adverse
impact on the financial services industry as a whole and on our business,
results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition in
particular. Our business recovery plan may not work as intended or
may not prevent significant interruption of our operations. The
occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches of our
information systems could damage our reputation, result in the loss of customer
business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil
litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have an adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operation.
Market
Risk
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc.'s stock price is volatile.
Our stock price has been volatile in
the past, and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially
in the future. These factors include:
·
|
Actual
or anticipated variations in
earnings;
|
·
|
Changes
in analysts' recommendations or
projections;
|
·
|
CTBI's
announcements of developments related to our
businesses;
|
·
|
Operating
and stock performance of other companies deemed to be
peers;
|
·
|
New
technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional
competitors; and
|
·
|
News
reports of trends, concerns, and other issues related to the financial
services industry.
|
Our stock price may fluctuate
significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to CTBI's
performance. General market price declines or market volatility in
the future could adversely affect the price of our common stock, and the current
market price may not be indicative of future market prices.
Technology
Risk
CTBI
continually encounters technological change.
The financial services industry is
continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of
new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of
technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better
serve customers and to reduce costs. Our future success depends, in
part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology
to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as
to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our
competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological
improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new
technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these
products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep
pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could
have a material adverse impact on our business and, in turn, our financial
condition and results of operations.
None.
5
The following tables set forth certain
statistical information relating to CTBI and subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis and should be read together with our consolidated financial
statements.
Consolidated Average Balance
Sheets and Taxable Equivalent Income/Expense and
Yields/Rates
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Average
Balances
|
Interest
|
Average
Rate
|
Average
Balances
|
Interest
|
Average
Rate
|
Average
Balances
|
Interest
|
Average
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
(1)(2)(3)
|
$ | 2,205,431 | $ | 171,632 | 7.78 | % | $ | 2,131,649 | $ | 163,526 | 7.67 | % | $ | 2,024,756 | $ | 137,602 | 6.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans
held for sale
|
2,484 | 157 | 6.32 | 1,685 | 130 | 7.71 | 1,135 | 131 | 11.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and agencies
|
275,219 | 12,034 | 4.37 | 312,611 | 13,520 | 4.32 | 391,810 | 15,984 | 4.08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
exempt state and political subdivisions (3)
|
45,514 | 2,946 | 6.47 | 49,173 | 3,175 | 6.46 | 50,995 | 3,237 | 6.35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
117,136 | 5,351 | 4.57 | 125,937 | 5,396 | 4.28 | 46,687 | 1,572 | 3.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
28,040 | 1,794 | 6.40 | 27,176 | 1,588 | 5.84 | 25,673 | 1,337 | 5.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
82,324 | 4,246 | 5.16 | 66,422 | 3,346 | 5.04 | 57,394 | 1,849 | 3.22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
2,010 | 88 | 4.38 | 811 | 38 | 4.69 | 993 | 26 | 2.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undistributed
income from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
1,856 | 130 | 7.00 | 1,861 | 160 | 8.60 | 1,861 | 160 | 8.60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
earning assets
|
2,760,014 | $ | 198,378 | 7.19 | % | 2,717,325 | $ | 190,879 | 7.02 | % | 2,601,304 | $ | 161,898 | 6.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan and lease losses
|
(28,129 | ) | (28,622 | ) | (29,236 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,731,885 | 2,688,703 | 2,572,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonearning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
75,667 | 78,069 | 78,251 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
54,434 | 56,846 | 55,480 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
118,727 | 119,274 | 111,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 2,980,713 | $ | 2,942,892 | $ | 2,817,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings
and demand deposits
|
$ | 696,329 | $ | 17,457 | 2.51 | % | $ | 664,958 | $ | 15,399 | 2.32 | % | $ | 624,908 | $ | 8,787 | 1.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
1,231,039 | 58,180 | 4.73 | 1,194,410 | 48,457 | 4.06 | 1,169,680 | 34,225 | 2.93 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements and federal funds purchased
|
174,697 | 8,429 | 4.82 | 185,098 | 8,620 | 4.66 | 118,906 | 3,819 | 3.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
67,452 | 2,402 | 3.56 | 108,355 | 3,648 | 3.37 | 152,823 | 4,872 | 3.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
61,830 | 4,364 | 7.06 | 61,341 | 5,414 | 8.83 | 61,341 | 5,414 | 8.83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest bearing liabilities
|
2,231,347 | $ | 90,832 | 4.07 | % | 2,214,162 | $ | 81,538 | 3.68 | % | 2,127,658 | $ | 57,117 | 2.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand
deposits
|
425,534 | 435,017 | 423,147 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
29,726 | 24,511 | 20,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,686,607 | 2,673,690 | 2,571,430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
294,106 | 269,202 | 246,119 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 2,980,713 | $ | 2,942,892 | $ | 2,817,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 107,546 | $ | 109,341 | $ | 104,781 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
3.12 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit
of interest free funding
|
0.78 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
3.90 | % | 4.02 | % | 4.02 | % |
(1)
Interest includes fees on loans of $1,819, $1,500, and $2,841 in 2007, 2006, and
2005, respectively.
(2) Loan
balances are net of unearned income and include principal balances on nonaccrual
loans.
(3) Tax
exempt income on securities and loans is reported on a fully taxable equivalent
basis using a 35% rate.
6
Net Interest
Differential
The following table illustrates the
approximate effect of volume and rate changes on net interest differentials
between 2007 and 2006 and also between 2006 and 2005.
Total
Change
|
Change
Due to
|
Total
Change
|
Change
Due to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2007/2006
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
2006/2005
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 8,106 | $ | 5,718 | $ | 2,388 | $ | 25,924 | $ | 7,536 | $ | 18,388 | ||||||||||||
Loans
held for sale
|
27 | 54 | (27 | ) | (1 | ) | 51 | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and agencies
|
(1,486 | ) | (1,601 | ) | 115 | (2,463 | ) | (3,081 | ) | 618 | ||||||||||||||
Tax
exempt state and political subdivisions
|
(229 | ) | (236 | ) | 7 | (62 | ) | (114 | ) | 52 | ||||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
(45 | ) | (364 | ) | 319 | 3,825 | 3,295 | 530 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
206 | 52 | 154 | 250 | 81 | 169 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
900 | 818 | 82 | 1,496 | 327 | 1,169 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
50 | 53 | (3 | ) | 12 | (4 | ) | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
Undistributed
income from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
(30 | ) | 0 | (30 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
7,499 | 4,494 | 3,005 | 28,981 | 8,091 | 20,890 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings
and demand deposits
|
2,058 | 748 | 1,310 | 6,612 | 596 | 6,016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
9,723 | 1,523 | 8,200 | 14,232 | 738 | 13,494 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements and federal funds purchased
|
(191 | ) | (474 | ) | 283 | 4,801 | 2,655 | 2,146 | ||||||||||||||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
(1,246 | ) | (1,308 | ) | 62 | (1,224 | ) | (1,351 | ) | 127 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
(1,050 | ) | 43 | (1,093 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
9,294 | 532 | 8,762 | 24,421 | 2,638 | 21,783 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | (1,795 | ) | $ | 3,962 | $ | (5,757 | ) | $ | 4,560 | $ | 5,453 | $ | (893 | ) |
For purposes of the above table,
changes which are due to both rate and volume are allocated based on a
percentage basis, using the absolute values of rate and volume variance as a
basis for percentages. Income is stated at a fully taxable equivalent
basis, assuming a 35% tax rate.
7
Investment
Portfolio
The maturity distribution and weighted
average interest rates of securities at December 31, 2007 are as
follows:
Available-for-sale
Estimated
Maturity at December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within
1 Year
|
1-5
Years
|
5-10
Years
|
After
10 Years
|
Total
Fair
Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury, government agencies, and government sponsored
agencies
|
$ | 2,218 | 5.32 | % | $ | 118,641 | 4.61 | % | $ | 101,636 | 4.55 | % | $ | 784 | 6.06 | % | $ | 223,279 | 4.59 | % | $ | 225,356 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal obligations
|
6,671 | 6.62 | 25,979 | 6.50 | 8,090 | 6.63 | 396 | 6.08 | 41,136 | 6.54 | 40,472 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
1 | 7.75 | 19,687 | 4.42 | 0 | 0.00 | 40,050 | 6.61 | 59,738 | 5.89 | 60,051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,890 | 6.30 | % | $ | 164,307 | 4.88 | % | $ | 109,726 | 4.70 | % | $ | 41,230 | 6.59 | % | $ | 324,153 | 5.08 | % | $ | 325,879 |
Held-to-maturity
Estimated
Maturity at December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within
1 Year
|
1-5
Years
|
5-10
Years
|
After
10 Years
|
Total
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
Yield
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury, government agencies, and government sponsored
agencies
|
$ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 31,058 | 3.83 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 31,058 | 3.83 | % | $ | 30,436 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal obligations
|
325 | 6.38 | 394 | 6.61 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,182 | 5.97 | 1,901 | 6.17 | 1,914 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 325 | 6.38 | % | $ | 31,452 | 3.86 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 1,182 | 5.97 | % | $ | 32,959 | 3.97 | % | $ | 32,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Securities
|
$ | 9,215 | 6.30 | % | $ | 195,759 | 4.72 | % | $ | 109,726 | 4.70 | % | $ | 42,412 | 6.58 | % | $ | 357,112 | 4.98 | % | $ | 358,229 |
The calculations of the weighted
average interest rates for each maturity category are based upon yield weighted
by the respective costs of the securities. The weighted average rates
on state and political subdivisions are computed on a taxable equivalent basis
using a 35% tax rate. For purposes of the above presentation,
maturities of mortgage-backed pass through certificates and collateralized
mortgage obligations are based on estimated maturities.
Excluding those holdings of the
investment portfolio in U.S. Treasury securities and other agencies of the U.S.
government, there were no securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of our
shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2007.
The book values of securities
available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity as of December 31, 2007 and
2006 are presented in note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements.
8
The book value of securities at
December 31, 2005 is presented below:
(in
thousands)
|
Available-for-Sale
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government agencies
|
$ | 2,005 | $ | 0 | ||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
46,932 | 3,134 | ||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
288,631 | 45,310 | ||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
1,012 | 0 | ||||||
Other
debt securities
|
16,991 | 0 | ||||||
Total
debt securities
|
355,571 | 48,444 | ||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
40,000 | 0 | ||||||
Total
securities
|
$ | 395,571 | $ | 48,444 |
Loan
Portfolio
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||||||
Commercial:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Construction
|
$ | 143,773 | $ | 133,902 | $ | 115,721 | $ | 75,078 | $ | 67,147 | ||||||||||
Secured
by real estate
|
640,574 | 632,881 | 665,911 | 613,059 | 583,924 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
333,774 | 337,075 | 301,828 | 276,921 | 256,837 | |||||||||||||||
Total
commercial
|
1,118,121 | 1,103,858 | 1,083,460 | 965,058 | 907,908 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
69,021 | 50,588 | 51,232 | 30,456 | 32,495 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
599,665 | 579,197 | 542,809 | 499,410 | 413,939 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
435,273 | 422,291 | 414,920 | 395,588 | 368,578 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
5,817 | 11,524 | 14,923 | 12,007 | 13,340 | |||||||||||||||
Total
loans
|
$ | 2,227,897 | $ | 2,167,458 | $ | 2,107,344 | $ | 1,902,519 | $ | 1,736,260 | ||||||||||
Percent
of total year-end loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Construction
|
6.45 | % | 6.18 | % | 5.49 | % | 3.95 | % | 3.87 | % | ||||||||||
Secured
by real estate
|
28.75 | 29.20 | 31.60 | 32.22 | 33.63 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
14.98 | 15.55 | 14.32 | 14.56 | 14.79 | |||||||||||||||
Total
commercial
|
50.18 | 50.93 | 51.41 | 50.73 | 52.29 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
3.10 | 2.34 | 2.43 | 1.60 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
26.92 | 26.72 | 25.76 | 26.25 | 23.84 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
19.54 | 19.48 | 19.69 | 20.79 | 21.23 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
0.26 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.77 | |||||||||||||||
Total
loans
|
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % |
The total
loans above are net of unearned income.
9
The following table shows the amounts
of loans (excluding residential mortgages of 1-4 family residences, consumer
loans, and lease financing) which, based on the remaining scheduled repayments
of principal are due in the periods indicated. Also, the amounts are
classified according to sensitivity to changes in interest rates (fixed,
variable).
Maturity
at December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Within
One Year
|
After
One but Within Five Years
|
After
Five Years
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate and commercial other
|
$ | 263,751 | $ | 256,753 | $ | 453,844 | $ | 974,348 | ||||||||
Commercial
and real estate construction
|
153,547 | 34,075 | 25,172 | 212,794 | ||||||||||||
$ | 417,298 | $ | 290,828 | $ | 479,016 | $ | 1,187,142 | |||||||||
Rate
sensitivity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Predetermined
rate
|
$ | 102,754 | $ | 105,847 | $ | 45,724 | $ | 254,325 | ||||||||
Adjustable
rate
|
314,544 | 184,981 | 433,292 | 932,817 | ||||||||||||
$ | 417,298 | $ | 290,828 | $ | 479,016 | $ | 1,187,142 |
Nonperforming
Assets
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual
loans
|
$ | 22,237 | $ | 9,863 | $ | 12,219 | $ | 13,808 | $ | 9,705 | ||||||||||
Restructured
loans
|
20 | 66 | 899 | 974 | 1,726 | |||||||||||||||
90
days or more past due and still accruing interest
|
9,622 | 4,294 | 8,284 | 5,319 | 5,463 | |||||||||||||||
Total
nonperforming loans
|
31,879 | 14,223 | 21,402 | 20,101 | 16,894 | |||||||||||||||
Foreclosed
properties
|
7,851 | 4,524 | 5,410 | 4,756 | 6,566 | |||||||||||||||
Total
nonperforming assets
|
$ | 39,730 | $ | 18,747 | $ | 26,812 | $ | 24,857 | $ | 23,460 | ||||||||||
Nonperforming
assets to total loans and foreclosed properties
|
1.78 | % | 0.86 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.35 | % | ||||||||||
Allowance
to nonperforming loans
|
88.00 | % | 193.54 | % | 137.87 | % | 134.41 | % | 145.93 | % |
10
Nonaccrual,
Past Due, and Restructured Loans
(in
thousands)
|
Nonaccrual
loans
|
As
a % of Loan Balances by Category
|
Restructured
Loans
|
As
a % of Loan Balances by Category
|
Accruing
Loans Past Due 90 Days or More
|
As
a % of Loan Balances by Category
|
Balances
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
$ | 8,682 | 6.04 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 1,733 | 1.21 | % | $ | 143,773 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
5,715 | 0.89 | 0 | 0.00 | 3,300 | 0.52 | 640,574 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
other
|
4,489 | 1.34 | 20 | 0.01 | 1,305 | 0.39 | 333,774 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate construction
|
723 | 1.05 | 0 | 0.00 | 722 | 1.05 | 69,021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate secured
|
2,628 | 0.44 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,113 | 0.35 | 599,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
other
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 449 | 0.10 | 435,273 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 5,817 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 22,237 | 1.00 | % | $ | 20 | 0.00 | % | $ | 9,622 | 0.43 | % | $ | 2,227,897 | ||||||||||||||
December
31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
$ | 430 | 0.32 | % | $ | 0 | 0.00 | % | $ | 283 | 0.21 | % | $ | 133,902 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
3,631 | 0.57 | 17 | 0.00 | 938 | 0.15 | 632,881 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
other
|
3,227 | 0.96 | 49 | 0.01 | 873 | 0.26 | 337,075 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate construction
|
361 | 0.71 | 0 | 0.00 | 405 | 0.80 | 50,588 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate secured
|
2,212 | 0.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,507 | 0.26 | 579,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
other
|
2 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 288 | 0.07 | 422,291 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 11,524 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 9,863 | 0.46 | % | $ | 66 | 0.00 | % | $ | 4,294 | 0.20 | % | $ | 2,167,458 |
In 2007, gross interest income that
would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans had the loans been current in
accordance with their original terms amounted to $2.3
million. Interest income actually received and included in net income
for the period was $0.3 million, leaving $2.0 million of interest income not
recognized during the period.
Discussion
of the Nonaccrual Policy
The accrual of interest income on loans
is discontinued when the collection of interest and principal in full is not
expected. When interest accruals are discontinued, interest income
accrued in the current period is reversed and interest income accrued in prior
periods is charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Any
loans past due 90 days or more must be well secured and in the process of
collection to continue accruing interest.
Potential
Problem Loans
Interest accrual is discontinued when
we believe, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral
value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such
that collection of interest is doubtful.
Foreign
Outstandings
None
Loan
Concentrations
We had no concentration of loans
exceeding 10% of total loans at December 31, 2007. See note 18 to the
consolidated financial statements for further information.
11
Analysis of the Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan and lease losses, beginning of year
|
$ | 27,526 | $ | 29,506 | $ | 27,017 | $ | 24,653 | $ | 23,271 | ||||||||||
Loans
charged off:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
273 | 23 | 56 | 339 | 164 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
1,106 | 872 | 826 | 1,135 | 773 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
other
|
2,134 | 3,816 | 4,233 | 2,331 | 4,085 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
32 | 56 | 10 | 20 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
547 | 572 | 746 | 683 | 957 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
4,340 | 4,091 | 5,097 | 5,080 | 5,725 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total
charge-offs
|
8,432 | 9,430 | 10,968 | 9,588 | 11,704 | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries
of loans previously charged off:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 32 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
180 | 132 | 94 | 301 | 243 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
other
|
428 | 689 | 766 | 382 | 450 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
250 | 210 | 310 | 244 | 159 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
1,561 | 2,114 | 2,223 | 2,376 | 2,870 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total
recoveries
|
2,420 | 3,145 | 3,413 | 3,304 | 3,754 | |||||||||||||||
Net
charge-offs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
273 | 23 | 56 | 338 | 132 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
926 | 740 | 732 | 834 | 530 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
other
|
1,706 | 3,127 | 3,467 | 1,949 | 3,635 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
31 | 56 | (10 | ) | 20 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
297 | 362 | 436 | 439 | 798 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
2,779 | 1,977 | 2,874 | 2,704 | 2,855 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total
net charge-offs
|
6,012 | 6,285 | 7,555 | 6,284 | 7,950 | |||||||||||||||
Provisions
charged against operations
|
6,540 | 4,305 | 8,285 | 8,648 | 9,332 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance
of acquired bank
|
0 | 0 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Balance,
end of year
|
$ | 28,054 | $ | 27,526 | $ | 29,506 | $ | 27,017 | $ | 24,653 | ||||||||||
Allocation
of allowance, end of year:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
$ | 3,194 | $ | 2,059 | $ | 1,799 | $ | 1,123 | $ | 2,623 | ||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
9,081 | 7,224 | 10,354 | 8,285 | 7,010 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
other
|
4,817 | 4,335 | 4,693 | 3,745 | 1,392 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
335 | 206 | 159 | 107 | 1,034 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
2,907 | 2,352 | 1,677 | 1,435 | 741 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
5,034 | 4,288 | 4,602 | 3,104 | 3,341 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
76 | 126 | 232 | 168 | 160 | |||||||||||||||
Unallocated
|
2,610 | 6,936 | 5,990 | 9,050 | 8,352 | |||||||||||||||
Balance,
end of year
|
$ | 28,054 | $ | 27,526 | $ | 29,506 | $ | 27,017 | $ | 24,653 | ||||||||||
Average
loans outstanding, net of unearned interest
|
$ | 2,205,431 | $ | 2,131,649 | $ | 2,024,756 | $ | 1,816,146 | $ | 1,658,289 | ||||||||||
Loans
outstanding at end of year, net of unearned interest
|
$ | 2,227,897 | $ | 2,167,458 | $ | 2,107,344 | $ | 1,902,519 | $ | 1,736,260 |
Net
charge-offs to average loan type:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
construction
|
0.19 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.06 | % | 0.47 | % | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
0.14 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
other
|
0.51 | 0.99 | 1.18 | 0.76 | 1.29 | |||||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
0.05 | 0.11 | (0.03 | ) | 0.06 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
0.64 | 0.48 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
0.27 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.48 | % | ||||||||||
Other
ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
to net loans, end of year
|
1.26 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.42 | % | ||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses to average loans
|
0.30 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.56 | % |
The allowance for loan and lease losses
balance is maintained at a level considered adequate to cover anticipated
probable losses based on past loss experience, general economic conditions,
information about specific borrower situations including their financial
position and collateral values, and other factors and estimates which are
subject to change over time. This analysis is completed quarterly and
forms the basis for allocation of the loan loss reserve and what charges to the
provision may be required. See note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements for further information.
12
Average Deposits and Other
Borrowed Funds
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||||||
Noninterest
bearing deposits
|
$ | 425,534 | $ | 435,017 | $ | 423,147 | ||||||
NOW
accounts
|
18,590 | 18,338 | 16,486 | |||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
483,782 | 437,707 | 383,900 | |||||||||
Savings
accounts
|
193,957 | 208,914 | 224,522 | |||||||||
Certificates
of deposit of $100,000 or more
|
456,483 | 417,671 | 409,866 | |||||||||
Certificates
of deposit < $100,000 and other time deposits
|
774,556 | 776,738 | 759,814 | |||||||||
Total
deposits
|
2,352,902 | 2,294,385 | 2,217,735 | |||||||||
Other
borrowed funds:
|
||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements and federal funds purchased
|
174,697 | 185,098 | 118,906 | |||||||||
Other
short-term borrowings
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
67,452 | 108,355 | 152,823 | |||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
61,830 | 61,341 | 61,341 | |||||||||
Total
other borrowed funds
|
303,979 | 354,794 | 333,070 | |||||||||
Total
deposits and other borrowed funds
|
$ | 2,656,881 | $ | 2,649,179 | $ | 2,550,805 |
The maximum balance for federal funds
purchased and repurchase agreements at any month-end during 2007 occurred at
August 31, 2007, with a month-end balance of $203.6 million. The
maximum balance for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements at any
month-end during 2006 occurred at May 31, 2006, with a month-end balance of
$220.2 million. The maximum balance for federal funds purchased and
repurchase agreements at any month-end during 2005 occurred at December 31,
2005, with a month-end balance of $146.6 million.
Maturities and/or repricing of time
deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2007 are summarized as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
Certificates
of Deposit
|
Other
Time Deposits
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Three
months or less
|
$ | 136,887 | $ | 10,239 | $ | 147,126 | ||||||
Over
three through six months
|
76,142 | 5,751 | 81,893 | |||||||||
Over
six through twelve months
|
182,874 | 7,547 | 190,421 | |||||||||
Over
twelve through sixty months
|
33,753 | 7,452 | 41,205 | |||||||||
Over
sixty months
|
100 | 200 | 300 | |||||||||
$ | 429,756 | $ | 31,189 | $ | 460,945 |
13
Our main office, which is owned by the
Bank, is located at 346 North Mayo Trail, Pikeville, Kentucky
41501. Following is a schedule of properties owned and leased by CTBI
and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007:
Location
|
Owned
|
Leased
|
Total
|
||
Banking
locations:
|
|||||
Community
Trust Bank, Inc.
|
|||||
*
|
Pikeville
Market (lease land to 3 owned locations)
|
9
|
1
|
10
|
|
10
locations in Pike County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Floyd/Knott/Johnson
Market (lease land to 1 owned location)
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
||
2
locations in Floyd County, Kentucky, 1 location in Knott County, Kentucky,
and 1 location in Johnson County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Tug
Valley Market (lease land to 1 owned location)
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
||
1
location in Pike County, Kentucky, 1 location in Mingo County, West
Virginia
|
|||||
Whitesburg
Market
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
||
5
locations in Letcher County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Hazard
Market (lease land to 2 owned locations)
|
4
|
0
|
4
|
||
4
locations in Perry County, Kentucky
|
|||||
*
|
Lexington
Market (lease land to 2 owned locations)
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
|
5
locations in Fayette County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Winchester
Market
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||
2
locations in Clark County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Richmond
Market (lease land to 1 owned location)
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
||
3
locations in Madison County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Mt.
Sterling Market
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
||
2
locations in Montgomery County, Kentucky
|
|||||
*
|
Versailles
Market (lease land to 1 owned location)
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
|
2
locations in Woodford County, Kentucky, 2 locations in Franklin County,
Kentucky, and 1 location in Scott County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Danville
Market (lease land to 1 owned location)
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
||
2
locations in Boyle County, Kentucky and 1 location in Mercer County,
Kentucky
|
|||||
*
|
Ashland
Market (lease land to 1 owned location)
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
|
4
locations in Boyd County, Kentucky and 1 location in Greenup County,
Kentucky
|
|||||
Flemingsburg
Market
|
4
|
0
|
4
|
||
4
locations in Fleming County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Advantage
Valley Market
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
||
2
locations in Lincoln County, West Virginia and 1 location in Wayne County,
West Virginia
|
|||||
Summersville
Market
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
||
1
location in Nicholas County, West Virginia
|
|||||
*
|
Middlesboro
Market (lease land to 1 owned location)
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
|
3
locations in Bell County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Williamsburg
Market
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
||
2
locations in Whitley County, Kentucky and 3 locations in Laurel County,
Kentucky
|
|||||
Campbellsville
Market (lease land to 2 owned locations)
|
8
|
0
|
8
|
||
2
locations in Taylor County, Kentucky, 2 locations in Pulaski County,
Kentucky, 1 location in Adair County, Kentucky, 1 location in Green
County, Kentucky, 1 location in Russell County, Kentucky, and 1 location
in Marion County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Mt.
Vernon Market
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
||
2
locations in Rockcastle County, Kentucky
|
|||||
Total
banking locations
|
68
|
8
|
76
|
||
Operational
locations:
|
|||||
Community
Trust Bank, Inc.
|
|||||
Pikeville
(Pike County, Kentucky) (lease land to 1 location)
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
||
Lexington
(Fayette County, Kentucky)
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
Total
operational locations
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||
Other:
|
|||||
Community
Trust Bank, Inc.
|
|||||
Ashland
(Boyd County, Kentucky)
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
Total
other locations
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
||
Total
locations
|
69
|
10
|
79
|
* Community Trust and Investment Company has leased offices in the main office locations in these markets.
See notes 9 and 15 to the consolidated
financial statements included herein for the year ended December 31, 2007, for
additional information relating to lease commitments and amounts invested in
premises and equipment.
CTBI and subsidiaries, and from time to
time, our officers, are named defendants in legal actions arising from ordinary
business activities. Management, after consultation with legal
counsel, believes any pending actions are without merit or that the ultimate
liability, if any, will not materially affect our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
14
There were no matters submitted to a
vote of security holders, through solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during
the fourth quarter of 2007.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
Set forth below are the executive
officers of CTBI at December 31, 2007, their positions with CTBI, and the year
in which they first became an executive officer or director.
Name and Age
(1)
|
Positions
and Offices Currently Held
|
Date
First Became
Director
or
Executive
Officer
|
Principal
Occupation
|
|
Jean
R. Hale; 61
|
Chairman,
President and CEO
|
1992
|
(2)
|
Chairman,
President and CEO of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
|
Mark
A. Gooch; 49
|
Executive
Vice President and Secretary
|
1997
|
(3)
|
President
and CEO of Community Trust Bank, Inc.
|
Tracy
Little; 67
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2003
|
(4)
|
President
and CEO of Community Trust and Investment Company
|
Michael
S. Wasson; 56
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2000
|
Executive
Vice President/ Central Kentucky Region President of Community Trust Bank,
Inc.
|
|
James
B. Draughn; 48
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2001
|
Executive
Vice President/Operations of Community Trust Bank, Inc.
|
|
Kevin
J. Stumbo; 47
|
Executive
Vice President and Treasurer
|
2002
|
(5)
|
Executive
Vice President/ Controller of Community Trust Bank,
Inc.
|
Ricky
D. Sparkman; 45
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2002
|
(6)
|
Executive
Vice President/ South Central Region President of Community Trust Bank,
Inc.
|
Richard
W. Newsom; 53
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2002
|
(7)
|
Executive
Vice President/ Eastern Region President of Community Trust Bank,
Inc.
|
James
J. Gartner; 66
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2002
|
(8)
|
Executive
Vice President/ Chief Credit Officer of Community Trust Bank,
Inc.
|
Larry
W. Jones; 61
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2002
|
(9)
|
Executive
Vice President/ Northeast Region President of Community Trust Bank,
Inc.
|
Steven
E. Jameson; 51
|
Executive
Vice President
|
2004
|
(10)
|
Executive
Vice President/ Chief Internal Audit & Risk
Officer
|
(1)
|
The
ages listed for CTBI's executive officers are as of February 29,
2008.
|
(2)
|
Ms.
Hale assumed the position of Chairman of the Board effective December 31,
2004.
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Gooch was named Secretary of CTBI effective April 26,
2005.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Little began employment with CTBI on August 4, 2003. Prior to
joining CTBI, Mr. Little served for three years in Sarasota, Florida as
Vice President of Fisher Investments, Inc., a $10 billion private
investment firm headquartered in Woodside, California. For the
two years prior, he served as Senior Vice President and Executive Officer
in charge of the Private Client Group of Provident Bank of
Florida. Mr. Little has thirty-nine years in the trust and
banking business and has been the executive in charge of five different
trust departments and trust
companies.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Stumbo served as Senior Vice President/Controller for the Bank for five
years prior to being promoted to Executive Vice
President/Controller. Mr. Stumbo was named Treasurer of CTBI
effective April 26, 2005. Mr. Stumbo has been a Certified
Public Accountant since 1985.
|
(6)
|
Mr.
Sparkman served as Vice President/Commercial Lending prior to being
promoted to Market President in January 2000. In 2002, Mr.
Sparkman was promoted to Executive Vice President and South Central Region
President.
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Newsom served as Senior Vice President of Consumer Lending for five years
prior to being promoted to Executive Vice President and Eastern Region
President of Community Trust Bank,
Inc.
|
(8)
|
Mr.
Gartner was employed for two years as Executive Vice President/Risk
Management by Hamilton Bank, N.A., Miami, Florida, with assets of $1.2
billion prior to joining CTBI. Prior to accepting his position
at Hamilton Bank, Mr. Gartner was employed as Executive Vice
President/Risk Manager, Chief Credit Officer, and Director at First
National Bank of Nevada Holding Company. For two months in
1998, Mr. Gartner served as Executive Vice President/Merger Liaison
Officer at Norwest Bank Arizona which purchased the Bank of Arizona and
The Bank of New Mexico where Mr. Gartner served as Executive Vice
President/Risk Management, Chief Credit Officer, and Director of the Bank
of Arizona for the two years prior.
|
(9)
|
Mr.
Jones was employed by AmSouth Bancorp, a $35 billion financial services
corporation, as District/City President for three years prior to joining
CTBI. Mr. Jones was employed by First American National Bank as
Division Manager for north Mississippi for one year prior to its merger
with AmSouth in 1999. For the thirty years prior, Mr. Jones was
employed by Deposit Guaranty National Bank, formerly Security State Bank,
prior to its merger with First American National Bank most recently as
President/Community Bank.
|
(10)
|
Mr.
Jameson is a non-voting member of the Executive Committee. Mr.
Jameson served as Lead Auditing Specialist for The World Bank Group in
Washington, D.C. for one year prior to joining CTBI in April
2004. For the four years prior, Mr. Jameson was employed by The
Institute of Internal Auditors, Inc. in Altamonte Springs, Florida as
Assistant Vice President of the Professional Practices
Group. Mr. Jameson's certifications include Certified Public
Accountant, Certified Internal Auditor, Certified Bank Auditor, Certified
Fraud Examiner, Certified Financial Services Auditor, and Certification in
Control Self-Assessment.
|
15
Our common stock is listed on The
NASDAQ-Stock Market LLC – Global Select Market under the symbol
CTBI. As of February 29, 2008, there were 5,745 holders of
record of our outstanding common shares. Additional information
required by this item is included in the Quarterly Financial Data
below:
Quarterly
Financial Data
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
December
31
|
September
30
|
June
30
|
March
31
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 26,939 | $ | 26,592 | $ | 26,611 | $ | 25,890 | ||||||||
Net
interest income, taxable equivalent basis
|
27,303 | 26,971 | 26,989 | 26,282 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
2,309 | 1,915 | 1,846 | 470 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
9,202 | 9,934 | 8,974 | 8,498 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
20,297 | 19,324 | 20,938 | 22,496 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
9,271 | 10,476 | 8,858 | 8,022 | ||||||||||||
Per
common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
0.61 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.52 | ||||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
0.29 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock price:
|
||||||||||||||||
High
|
$ | 32.50 | $ | 33.46 | $ | 37.98 | $ | 41.50 | ||||||||
Low
|
26.09 | 26.47 | 31.40 | 33.87 | ||||||||||||
Last
trade
|
27.53 | 30.01 | 32.30 | 36.23 | ||||||||||||
Selected
ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||
Return
on average assets, annualized
|
1.26 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.09 | % | ||||||||
Return
on average common equity, annualized
|
12.22 | 14.04 | 12.16 | 11.33 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest margin, annualized
|
4.02 | 3.86 | 3.86 | 3.84 | ||||||||||||
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 26,738 | $ | 27,465 | $ | 27,206 | $ | 26,358 | ||||||||
Net
interest income, taxable equivalent basis
|
27,135 | 27,861 | 27,597 | 26,748 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,200 | 1,755 | 1,350 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
8,572 | 8,191 | 8,054 | 7,742 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
20,506 | 19,957 | 19,867 | 20,077 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
9,520 | 9,884 | 9,892 | 9,768 | ||||||||||||
Per
common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.63 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.65 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
0.62 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | ||||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
0.27 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock price:
|
||||||||||||||||
High
|
$ | 42.59 | $ | 39.07 | $ | 35.50 | $ | 35.90 | ||||||||
Low
|
36.51 | 33.62 | 31.50 | 30.60 | ||||||||||||
Last
trade
|
41.53 | 37.65 | 34.93 | 33.90 | ||||||||||||
Selected
ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||
Return
on average assets, annualized
|
1.28 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.36 | % | ||||||||
Return
on average common equity, annualized
|
13.45 | 14.40 | 15.02 | 15.27 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest margin, annualized
|
3.95 | 4.08 | 4.03 | 4.04 |
16
Dividends
The annual dividend paid to our
stockholders was increased from $1.05 per share to $1.10 per share during
2007. We have adopted a conservative policy of cash dividends by
maintaining an average annual cash dividend ratio of less than 45%, with
periodic stock dividends. Dividends are typically paid on a quarterly
basis. Future dividends are subject to the discretion of CTBI’s Board
of Directors, cash needs, general business conditions, dividends from our
subsidiaries, and applicable governmental regulations and
policies. For information concerning restrictions on dividends from
the subsidiary bank to CTBI, see note 20 to the consolidated financial
statements included herein for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Stock
Repurchases
CTBI repurchased 196,500 shares of its
common stock during 2007, leaving 382,019 shares remaining under CTBI's current
repurchase authorization. We did not acquire any shares of stock
through the stock repurchase program during the year 2006. For
further information, see the Liquidity and Market Risk section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Common
Stock Performance
The following graph shows the
cumulative return experienced by CTBI's shareholders during the last five years
compared to the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) and the NASDAQ Bank Stock
Index. The graph assumes the investment of $100 on December 31, 2002
in CTBI's common stock and in each index and the reinvestment of all dividends
paid during the five-year period.
Comparison
of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
among
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.),
and
NASDAQ Bank Stocks
Fiscal
Year Ending December 31 ($)
|
||||||
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc.
|
100.00
|
135.70
|
164.23
|
161.03
|
222.98
|
153.72
|
NASDAQ
Stock Market (U.S.)
|
100.00
|
149.52
|
162.72
|
166.18
|
182.57
|
197.98
|
NASDAQ
Bank Stocks
|
100.00
|
128.64
|
147.22
|
143.82
|
161.41
|
127.92
|
17
(in
thousands except per share amounts and # of employees)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Year
Ended December 31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 196,864 | $ | 189,305 | $ | 160,322 | $ | 130,561 | $ | 128,554 | ||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
90,832 | 81,538 | 57,117 | 37,349 | 43,935 | |||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
106,032 | 107,767 | 103,205 | 93,212 | 84,619 | |||||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
6,540 | 4,305 | 8,285 | 8,648 | 9,332 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
36,608 | 32,559 | 33,467 | 33,917 | 36,372 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
83,055 | 80,407 | 78,569 | 74,595 | 70,735 | |||||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
53,045 | 55,614 | 49,818 | 43,886 | 40,924 | |||||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
16,418 | 16,550 | 15,406 | 12,936 | 12,033 | |||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 36,627 | $ | 39,064 | $ | 34,412 | $ | 30,950 | $ | 28,891 | ||||||||||
Per
common share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2.42 | $ | 2.59 | $ | 2.31 | $ | 2.09 | $ | 1.95 | ||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared-
|
$ | 1.10 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 0.98 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||||
as
a % of net income
|
45.45 | % | 40.54 | % | 42.42 | % | 41.63 | % | 38.46 | % | ||||||||||
Book
value, end of year
|
$ | 20.03 | $ | 18.63 | $ | 16.93 | $ | 15.91 | $ | 14.95 | ||||||||||
Market
price, end of year
|
$ | 27.53 | $ | 41.53 | $ | 30.75 | $ | 32.36 | $ | 27.46 | ||||||||||
Market
to book value, end of year
|
1.37 | x | 2.23 | x | 1.82 | x | 2.03 | x | 1.84 | x | ||||||||||
Price/earnings
ratio, end of year
|
11.38 | x | 16.03 | x | 13.31 | x | 15.48 | x | 14.08 | x | ||||||||||
Cash
dividend yield, end of year
|
4.00 | % | 2.53 | % | 3.19 | % | 2.69 | % | 2.73 | % | ||||||||||
At
year-end:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 2,902,684 | $ | 2,969,761 | $ | 2,851,053 | $ | 2,710,935 | $ | 2,475,880 | ||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
61,341 | 61,341 | 61,341 | 61,341 | 61,341 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
301,355 | 282,375 | 253,945 | 236,169 | 221,393 | |||||||||||||||
Averages:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 2,980,713 | $ | 2,942,892 | $ | 2,817,549 | $ | 2,545,133 | $ | 2,494,147 | ||||||||||
Deposits
|
2,352,902 | 2,294,385 | 2,217,735 | 2,078,691 | 2,109,752 | |||||||||||||||
Earning
assets
|
2,760,014 | 2,717,325 | 2,601,304 | 2,339,401 | 2,292,720 | |||||||||||||||
Loans
|
2,205,431 | 2,131,649 | 2,024,756 | 1,816,146 | 1,658,289 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
294,106 | 269,202 | 246,119 | 229,561 | 215,086 | |||||||||||||||
Profitability
ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Return
on average assets
|
1.23 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||
Return
on average equity
|
12.45 | % | 14.51 | % | 13.98 | % | 13.48 | % | 13.43 | % | ||||||||||
Capital
ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity
to assets, end of year
|
10.38 | % | 9.51 | % | 8.91 | % | 8.71 | % | 8.94 | % | ||||||||||
Average
equity to average assets
|
9.87 | % | 9.15 | % | 8.74 | % | 9.02 | % | 8.62 | % | ||||||||||
Risk
based capital ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(to
average assets)
|
10.32 | % | 9.58 | % | 8.94 | % | 8.78 | % | 8.73 | % | ||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
13.24 | % | 12.21 | % | 11.52 | % | 11.82 | % | 11.35 | % | ||||||||||
Total
capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
14.49 | % | 13.43 | % | 12.76 | % | 13.07 | % | 12.60 | % | ||||||||||
Other
significant ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
to net loans, end of year
|
1.26 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.42 | % | ||||||||||
Allowance
to nonperforming loans, end of year
|
88.00 | % | 193.54 | % | 137.87 | % | 134.41 | % | 145.93 | % | ||||||||||
Nonperforming
assets to loans and foreclosed properties, end of year
|
1.78 | % | 0.86 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.35 | % |
Net
interest margin
|
3.90 | % | 4.02 | % | 4.02 | % | 4.06 | % | 3.76 | % | ||||||||||
Other
statistics:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Average
common shares outstanding
|
15,150 | 15,086 | 14,908 | 14,811 | 14,821 | |||||||||||||||
Number
of full-time equivalent employees, end of year
|
1,011 | 1,021 | 1,003 | 954 | 901 |
18
Overview
The following Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is
intended to help the reader understand Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., our
operations, and our present business environment. The MD&A is
provided as a supplement to—and should be read in conjunction with—our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained
in Item 8 of this annual report. The MD&A includes the following
sections:
v
|
Our
Business
|
v
|
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
|
v
|
Results
of Operations
|
v
|
Liquidity
and Market Risk
|
v
|
Stock
Repurchase Program
|
v
|
Interest
Rate Risk
|
v
|
Capital
Resources
|
v
|
Impact
of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Local Economic
Conditions
|
v
|
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
|
Our
Business
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”)
is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky. At
December 31, 2007, CTBI owned one commercial bank and one trust
company. Through its subsidiaries, CTBI has seventy-six banking
locations in eastern, northeast, central, and south central Kentucky and
southern West Virginia, and five trust offices across Kentucky. At
December 31, 2007, CTBI had total consolidated assets of $2.9 billion and total
consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $2.5 billion, making
it the second largest bank holding company headquartered in the Commonwealth of
Kentucky. Total shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2007 was $301.4
million.
Through its subsidiaries, CTBI engages
in a wide range of commercial and personal banking and trust activities, which
include accepting time and demand deposits; making secured and unsecured loans
to corporations, individuals and others; providing cash management services to
corporate and individual customers; issuing letters of credit; renting safe
deposit boxes; and providing funds transfer services. The lending
activities of our Bank include making commercial, construction, mortgage, and
personal loans. Lease-financing, lines of credit, revolving lines of
credit, term loans, and other specialized loans, including asset-based
financing, are also available. Our corporate subsidiaries act as
trustees of personal trusts, as executors of estates, as trustees for employee
benefit trusts, as registrars, transfer agents, and paying agents for bond and
stock issues, as depositories for securities, and as providers of full service
brokerage services. For further information, see Item 1 of this
annual report.
Additional
Information
CTBI terminated its previously
announced Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 31, 2007 with Eagle Fidelity,
Inc. On August 10, 2007, CTBI was informed that the Eagle Board of
Directors had determined that a third party had made a “superior proposal” for
the acquisition of Eagle. CTBI’s Board of Directors determined that
it would not increase the consideration under the merger
agreement. CTBI received payment of a termination fee under the
merger agreement in the amount of $1.2 million during the third quarter
2007.
19
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain
accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions
about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their
impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably
differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the
consolidated financial statements.
We believe the application of
accounting policies and the estimates required therein are
reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly
reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a
change. Historically, we have found our application of accounting
policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from
those determined using necessary estimates.
Our accounting policies are more fully
described in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. We have
identified the following critical accounting policies:
Loans – Loans with the ability
and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the
carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest and an allowance
for loan and lease losses. Income is recorded on the level yield
basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes,
after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and
collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that
collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days
past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue
accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans
generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded
once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not
reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments are brought
current and future payments appear reasonably certain.
Loan origination and commitment fees
and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount
amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments
as a yield adjustment.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
– We
maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that is
appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans
determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the
remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. Since arriving at an
appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, we use an
ongoing quarterly analysis to develop a range of estimated losses. In
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
we use our best estimate within the range of potential credit loss to determine
the appropriate ALLL. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are
credited to the ALLL.
We utilize an internal risk grading
system for commercial credits. Those larger commercial credits that
exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual
review. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage,
and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are
evaluated. The review of individual loans includes those loans that
are impaired as provided in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 114, Accounting by
Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. We evaluate the
collectibility of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss
provision. Historical loss rates are applied to other commercial
loans not subject to specific allocations. The loss rates are
determined from a migration analysis which computes the net charge off
experience on loans according to their internal risk grade.
Homogenous loans, such as consumer
installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually
risk graded. The associated ALLL for these loans is measured under
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. The ALLL allocation for these pools of loans is
established based on the average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios over
the previous eight quarters.
Historical loss rates for commercial
and retail loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s
judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss
recognition. Factors that we consider include delinquency trends,
current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and
administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of
recoveries to prior year's charge offs, trend in loan losses, industry
concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and
underwriting exceptions. These factors are reviewed quarterly and a
weighted range developed with a “most likely” scenario
determined. The total of each of these weighted factors is then
applied against the applicable portion of the portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted
accordingly.
Loans Held for Sale – Mortgage
loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at
the lower of cost or estimated market value in the aggregate. Net
unrealized losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance by charges to
income.
Premises and Equipment –
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Capital leases are included in premises and equipment
at the capitalized amount less accumulated amortization. Premises and
equipment are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis.
Depreciation and amortization are
computed primarily using the straight-line method. Estimated useful
lives range up to 40 years for buildings, 2 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures,
and equipment, and up to the lease term for leasehold
improvements. Capitalized leased assets are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the lives of the respective leases.
Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible
– We
evaluate total goodwill and core deposit intangible for impairment, based upon
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets and SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial
Institutions, using fair value techniques including multiples of
price/equity. Goodwill and core deposit intangible are evaluated for
impairment on an annual basis or as other events may warrant.
Amortization of core deposit intangible
is estimated at approximately $0.6 million annually for the next two years,
approximately $0.4 million in year three, and approximately $0.1 million in
years four and five.
Income Taxes – Income tax
expense is based on the taxes due on the consolidated tax return plus deferred
taxes based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted
tax rates.
Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) –
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted EPS adjusts the number of
weighted average shares of common stock outstanding by the dilutive effect of
stock options as prescribed in SFAS No. 123R which is discussed in the New
Accounting Standards section below.
Segments – Management analyzes
the operation of CTBI assuming one operating segment, community banking
services. CTBI, through its operating subsidiaries, offers a wide
range of consumer and commercial community banking services. These
services include: (i) residential and commercial real estate loans; (ii)
checking accounts; (iii) regular and term savings accounts and savings
certificates; (iv) full service securities brokerage services; (v) consumer
loans; (vi) debit cards; (vii) annuity and life insurance products; (viii)
Individual Retirement Accounts and Keogh plans; (ix) commercial loans; (x) trust
services; and (xi) commercial demand deposit accounts.
Bank Owned Life Insurance –
CTBI's bank owned life insurance policies are carried at their cash
surrender value. We recognize tax-free income from the periodic
increases in cash surrender value of these policies and from death
benefits.
Mortgage Servicing Rights –
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are carried at fair market value with the
implementation of SFAS 156 in January 2007. The fair value is
determined quarterly based on an independent third-party valuation using a
discounted cash flow analysis and calculated using a computer pricing
model. The computer valuation is based on key economic assumptions
including the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average
life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted-average coupon, and the
weighted-average default rate, as applicable. MSRs are a component of
other assets. Along with the gains received from the sale of loans,
fees are received for servicing loans. These fees include late fees,
which are recorded in interest income, and ancillary fees and monthly servicing
fees, which are recorded in noninterest income. Costs of servicing
loans are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in fair market
value of the MSRs are reported as an increase or decrease to mortgage banking
income.
20
New Accounting Standards
–
Ø Stock-Based Employee Compensation –
Effective January 1, 2006, CTBI adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the
modified retrospective application basis in accounting for stock-based
compensation plans. Under SFAS No. 123(R), CTBI recognizes
compensation expense for the grant-date fair value of stock-based compensation
issued over its requisite service period. Awards with a graded
vesting are expensed on a straight-line basis. The grant-date fair
value of stock options is measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. Had compensation cost for CTBI’s stock options granted in 2005
been determined under the fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, CTBI’s net income and earnings per share would have been
reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Years
ended December 31
|
2005
|
||||
Net
income as reported
|
$ | 34,412 | |||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
(994 | ) | |||
Tax
effect
|
141 | ||||
Net
income pro forma
|
$ | 33,559 | |||
Basic
net income per share
|
As
reported
|
$ | 2.31 | ||
Pro
forma
|
2.25 | ||||
Diluted
net income per share
|
As
reported
|
$ | 2.27 | ||
Pro
forma
|
2.22 |
Ø Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes – In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes - An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This statement also prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. The evaluation of a tax position in
accordance with this statement is a two-step process. The first step
is a recognition process to determine whether it is more likely than not that a
tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any
related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the
position. The second step is a measurement process whereby a tax
position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is calculated
to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial
statements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. CTBI adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January
1, 2007. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this
statement was recognized as a $0.6 million adjustment to the beginning balance
of retained earnings. An additional $28 thousand increase to the FIN
48 liability was charged to current income tax expense during the quarter ended
March 31, 2007. The FIN 48 liability is carried in other liabilities
in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2007. Approximately $0.2 million in FIN 48 liability is relative to
state nexus issues. As of September 30, 2007, we reported resolution
of these issues would be completed by March 2008. However, due to
ongoing negotiations with the jurisdiction involved, we now anticipate the
filing of these returns by December 31, 2008. CTBI is subject to
taxation in the United States and various state and local
jurisdictions. For federal tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2004
through 2007 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. For
state and local tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2003 through 2007 are subject
to examination by the tax authorities. CTBI currently recognizes
interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income
tax expense.
Ø Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets – SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets amends SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities – a replacement
of SFAS No. 125, by requiring, in certain situations, an entity to
recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an
obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing
contract. All separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
liabilities are required to be initially measured at fair
value. Subsequent measurement methods include the amortization
method, whereby servicing assets or servicing liabilities are amortized in
proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net
servicing loss or the fair value method, whereby servicing assets or servicing
liabilities are measured at fair value at each reporting date and changes in
fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which they
occur. If the amortization method is used, an entity must assess
servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation
based on the fair value at each reporting date. Adoption of SFAS 156
on January 1, 2007 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Ø Fair Value Measurements – In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
which provides guidance on how to measure assets and liabilities that use fair
value. SFAS 157 will apply whenever another generally accepted
accounting principle standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be
measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value to any new
circumstances. This statement also will require additional
disclosures in both annual and quarterly reports. SFAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and was adopted by CTBI beginning the first quarter of
2008. This statement will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Ø Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities – In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing
entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities using different measurement
techniques. SFAS 159 requires additional disclosures related to the
fair value measurements included in the entity's financial
statements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after Nov. 15, 2007. Accordingly,
CTBI adopted SFAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008. This statement
will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Ø Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of
Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards – On June 14, 2007, the Emerging
Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits
of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards. This consensus was
ratified by FASB on June 27, 2007. This issue states that tax
benefits received on dividends paid to employees associated with their unvested
stock compensation awards should be recorded in additional paid-in capital
(“APIC”) for awards expected to vest. Currently, such dividends are
accounted for as a permanent tax deduction reducing the annual effective income
tax rate. This issue is to be applied prospectively to dividends
declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2007. Retrospective application of this Issue is
prohibited. Issue No. 06-11 will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
Ø Business
Combinations (Revised 2007) – The FASB recently issued
SFAS No. 141(R), which replaces FAS 141, Business Combinations, and
applies to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control
over one or more other businesses. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer,
upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets,
liabilities, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as
of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be
recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at
a later date when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a
reasonable doubt. This fair value approach replaces the
cost-allocation process required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an
acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair value. SFAS 141R requires
acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than
allocating such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as was
previously the case under SFAS 141. Under SFAS 141R, the requirements
of SFAS 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, would have to be met
in order to accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase
accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at
fair value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to
materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting,
and instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable
recognition criteria of SFAS 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. SFAS 141R is expected to have a significant
impact on our accounting for business combinations closing on or after January
1, 2009.
Ø Accounting for Deferred Compensation
and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements – EITF Issue
No. 06-4, Accounting for
Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split
Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements requires the recognition of a
liability and related compensation expense for endorsement split-dollar life
insurance policies that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to
post-retirement periods. Under EITF 06-4, life insurance policies
purchased for the purpose of providing such benefits do not effectively settle
an entity’s obligation to the employee. Accordingly, the entity must
recognize a liability and related compensation expense during the employee’s
active service period based on the future cost of insurance to be incurred
during the employee’s retirement. If the entity has agreed to provide the
employee with a death benefit, then the liability for the future death benefit
should be recognized by following the guidance in SFAS 106, Employer’s Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. CTBI adopted
EITF 06-4 effective as of January 1, 2008 as a change in accounting
principle through a $1.8 million cumulative-effect adjustment to retained
earnings.
21
Results
of Operations
2007
Compared to 2006
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. reported
earnings for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $36.6 million or $2.42 per
basic share compared to $39.1 million or $2.59 per basic share earned for the
year 2006. The decrease in net income was primarily driven by a $1.7
million decrease in net interest income and a $2.2 million increase in provision
for loan losses. CTBI's basic earnings per share for the year
decreased 6.6% from the year ended December 31, 2006. Our average
shares outstanding increased from 15.1 million shares at December 31, 2006 to
15.2 million shares at December 31, 2007.
v
|
Core
earnings for the year 2007 reflect the pressure on our net interest income
as CTBI operated within an inverted yield curve through most of
2007.
|
v
|
Nonperforming
loans at December 31, 2007 were $31.9 million, an increase of $17.7
million from 2006.
|
v
|
Our
loan portfolio increased 2.8% from December 31, 2006. The
market remains highly competitive and CTBI is continuing to focus on asset
quality and loan yield.
|
v
|
Our
investment portfolio declined 23.4% from prior year, resulting from the
payment of a $40 million FHLB advance and a decline in deposits which were
funded through the sale of auction rate
securities.
|
v
|
Our
efficiency ratio improved during the year 2007 primarily resulting from
the 2007 receipt of a $1.2 million acquisition termination fee and the
2006 inclusion of a performance based employee incentive in the amount of
$3.0 million which was not paid in
2007.
|
v
|
Return
on average assets for the year was 1.23% compared to 1.33% for the year
2006. Return on average equity was 12.45% compared to
14.51%.
|
Net
Interest Income:
Our net interest margin declined 12
basis points year over year. Net interest income decreased $1.7
million from prior year. The yield on average earnings assets for the
year 2007 increased 17 basis points from 2006 in comparison to the 39 basis
point increase in the cost of interest bearing funds. Average earning
assets have increased 1.6% from prior year-end.
Provision
for Loan Losses and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
The provision for loan losses that was
added to the allowance for 2007 increased $2.2 million from the year
2006. This provision represents a charge against current earnings in
order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level determined using the
accounting estimates described in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
section.
Nonperforming loans at December 31,
2007 were $31.9 million compared to $14.2 million at December 31,
2006. All nonperforming loans are individually reviewed with specific
reserves established when appropriate. The increase in nonperforming
loans is driven primarily by the increased inventory and the number of days on
the market of residential real estate developments in Central
Kentucky. We anticipate nonperforming loans to remain higher than
recent history as the normal legal collection time period for real estate
secured assets has been slowed due to increased volumes in the
industry. Our loan portfolio management processes focus on
maintaining appropriate reserves for potential losses.
While we do not have subprime lending
programs (i.e. Hybrid ARMs, Alt-A, Payment Option Loans, etc.), we do make loans
that have subprime characteristics by regulatory definition; however, each loan
is individually underwritten based on its creditworthiness. The
industry has experienced significant losses and increases in nonperforming loans
in this area. Although CTBI has shown an increase in residential
nonperforming loans between year-end 2006 and 2007, we have also shown a
decrease in 30-89 day past dues, and loan losses for 2007 represented only 0.09%
in the residential portfolio.
Foreclosed properties at December 31,
2007 of $7.9 million were an approximate $3.4 million increase from the $4.5
million on December 31, 2006. The year over year increase was driven
by a $2.6 million increase in single family residential properties from our
Central Kentucky Region where the market has softened.
Net loan charge-offs for the year ended
December 31, 2007 of 0.27% of average loans annualized was a decrease from the
0.29% for 2006. Our reserve for losses on loans as a percentage of
total loans outstanding at December 31, 2007 was 1.26% compared to 1.27% at
December 31, 2006. The adequacy of our reserve for losses on loans is
analyzed quarterly and adjusted as necessary.
Noninterest
Income:
Noninterest income, after normalizing
for the receipt of the $1.2 million fee associated with the termination of the
Eagle Fidelity, Inc. acquisition in the third quarter, increased 8.8% from the
year ended December 31, 2006, with increases in gains on sales of loans, deposit
service charges, trust revenue, and loan related fees.
Noninterest
Expense:
Noninterest expense increased 3.3% as a
$1.2 million charge related to unamortized debt issuance costs with the
redemption of trust preferred securities was offset by a decrease in personnel
expense associated with the $3.0 million payment of a performance based employee
incentive in 2006 which was not paid in 2007.
Balance
Sheet Review:
CTBI’s total assets decreased $67.1
million or 2.3% from prior year. The year over year decrease resulted
from the payoff of a $40 million FHLB advance and a decline in deposits which
were funded through the sale of auction rate securities. Loans
outstanding at December 31, 2007 were $2.2 billion reflecting a $60.4 million or
2.8% increase year over year. CTBI's investment portfolio decreased
$109.2 million from prior year-end. Deposits, including repurchase
agreements, declined $50.7 million or 2.0% during the year as CTBI focused on
managing deposit growth and pricing controls due to its liquidity
position. The deposit (including repurchase agreements) to FTE
(full-time equivalent) ratio decreased to $2.4 million at December 31, 2007 from
$2.5 million at December 31, 2006. Shareholders’ equity of $301.4
million on December 31, 2007 was an increase of 6.7% from December 31,
2006.
22
2006
Compared to 2005
Net income for the year 2006 increased
13.5% over 2005 while our basic earnings per share increased
12.1%. The increase in net income was primarily driven by a $4.6
million increase in our net interest revenue and a $4.0 million decrease in
provision for loan losses. See below for further
information. Our average shares outstanding increased from 14.9
million in 2005 to 15.1 million in 2006.
Net
Interest Income:
Our year over year net interest margin
remained flat at 4.02%. As rates stabilized in the latter part of the
year, the margin compressed as expected. Our net interest margin for
the fourth quarter 2006 was 3.94% compared to 4.12% for the fourth quarter 2005
and 4.08% for the third quarter 2006.
Year-to-date net interest income
increased 4.4% from the year ended December 31, 2005. Interest income
increased $29.0 million or 18.1% while interest expense increased $24.4 million
or 42.8%. Average earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2006
increased $116.0 million or 4.5% over 2005. Average interest bearing
liabilities increased $86.5 million or 4.1% over prior year. The
taxable equivalent yield on average earning assets for the year 2006 increased
80 basis points from prior year to 7.02% while the cost of interest of interest
bearing liabilities increased 100 basis points to 3.68%. The cost of
interest bearing liabilities has been impacted by the change in deposit mix as
well as by a change in market rates. Average interest bearing
deposits including repurchase agreements increased 6.4% during 2006 while
average noninterest bearing deposits decreased 5.2%. Average loans
accounted for 78.5% of average earning assets in 2006 and 77.9% in
2005.
Provision
for Loan Losses and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
The provision for loan losses that was
added to the allowance was $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
compared to $8.3 million for 2005. This provision represents a charge
against current earnings in order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate
level determined using the accounting estimates described in the Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates section. Loan losses, net of
recoveries, for the year decreased 16.8% from $7.6 million, or 0.4% of average
loans, to $6.3 million, or 0.3% of average loans. Reflective of the
improvement in asset quality, our reserve for losses on loans as a percentage of
total loans outstanding at December 31, 2006 decreased to 1.27% from the 1.40%
at December 31, 2005.
Nonperforming loans at December 31,
2006 were $14.2 million, a 33.5% decrease from $21.4 million at December 31,
2005. Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans at December
31, 2006 were 0.66%, a 36 basis point decrease from December 31,
2005.
Foreclosed properties at December 31,
2006 were $4.5 million compared to $5.4 million on December 31,
2005.
Noninterest
Income:
Year-to-date noninterest income
decreased 2.7% to $32.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from the
$33.6 million for the same period last year. Increases in recurring
revenue sources year over year 2005 to 2006 in deposit related fees and trust
revenue were offset by declines in gains on sales of loans due to the interest
rate environment and loan related fees.
Noninterest
Expense:
Year-to-date noninterest expense
increased 2.3% from $78.6 million to $80.4 million. The most
significant components of this increase were a 3.8% increase in personnel
expenses due to normal annual salary adjustments and health care costs and a
6.8% increase in occupancy and equipment due to expenditures for new branch
locations and technology and communication upgrades to our core operating
systems.
Our
efficiency ratio for the year 2006 improved 16 basis points from 2005 to
56.67%. The deposit (including repurchase agreements) to FTE
(full-time equivalent) ratio increased to $2.5 million at December 31, 2006 from
$2.4 million at December 31, 2005.
23
Liquidity
and Market Risk
The objective of CTBI’s Asset/Liability
management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income
within our policy limits. This objective is accomplished through management of
our consolidated balance sheet composition, liquidity, and interest rate risk
exposures arising from changing economic conditions, interest rates, and
customer preferences. The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate
funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand or deposit withdrawals. This is
accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash and cash
equivalents and investment securities, maintaining sufficient unused borrowing
capacity, and growth in core deposits. As of December 31, 2007, we had
approximately $137.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately
$324.2 million in securities valued at estimated fair value designated as
available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing
basis. Additional asset-driven liquidity is provided by the remainder
of the securities portfolio and the repayment of loans. In addition
to core deposit funding, we also have a variety of other short-term and
long-term funding sources available. We also rely on Federal Home
Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of our asset/liability
position. Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $40.9 million at
December 31, 2007 compared to $81.2 million at December 31, 2006. As
of December 31, 2007, we had a $398.9 million available borrowing position with
the Federal Home Loan Bank. We generally rely upon net inflows of
cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from
operating activities, to provide cash for our investing
activities. As is typical of many financial institutions, significant
financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing
facilities such as repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, and
issuance of long-term debt. At December 31, 2007, we had a $12
million revolving line of credit, all of which is currently available to meet
any future cash needs. Our primary investing activities include
purchases of securities and loan originations. We do not rely on any
one source of liquidity and manage availability in response to changing
consolidated balance sheet needs.
Stock
Repurchase Program
CTBI’s stock repurchase program began
in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was
increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000. CTBI issued
a press release on May 13, 2003 announcing its intention to repurchase up to
1,000,000 additional shares. During the year 2006, we did not acquire
shares of CTBI’s stock; however, during 2007, we repurchased 196,500
shares. As of December 31, 2007, a total of 2,117,981 shares have
been repurchased through this program. The following table shows
Board authorizations and repurchases made through the stock repurchase program
for the years 1998 through 2007:
Board
Authorizations
|
Repurchases*
|
Shares
Available for Repurchase
|
||
Average
Price ($)
|
#
of Shares
|
|||
1998
|
500,000
|
-
|
0
|
|
1999
|
0
|
15.89
|
131,517
|
|
2000
|
1,000,000
|
11.27
|
694,064
|
|
2001
|
0
|
14.69
|
444,945
|
|
2002
|
0
|
19.48
|
360,287
|
|
2003
|
1,000,000
|
21.58
|
235,668
|
|
2004
|
0
|
25.45
|
55,000
|
|
2005
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
|
2006
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
|
2007
|
0
|
31.42
|
196,500
|
|
Total
|
2,500,000
|
17.06
|
2,117,981
|
382,019
|
*Repurchased
shares and average prices have been restated to reflect stock dividends that
have occurred; however, board authorized shares have not been
adjusted.
Interest
Rate Risk
We consider interest rate risk one of
our most significant market risks. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse
changes in net interest income due to changes in interest
rates. Consistency of our net interest revenue is largely dependent
upon the effective management of interest rate risk. We employ a
variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage our interest rate risk
including the use of an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income
sensitivity to changing interest rates. The model is based on actual
cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet
instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of
changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and
liabilities. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit
rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also
incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently
uncertain, and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest
income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net
interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results
due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as
changes in market conditions and management strategies.
24
CTBI’s Asset/Liability Management
Committee (ALCO), which includes executive and senior management representatives
and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk
within Board-approved policy limits. Our current exposure to interest
rate risks is determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest
income spread evenly over the twelve-month period.
The following table shows our estimated
earnings sensitivity profile as of December 31, 2007:
Change
in Interest Rates
(basis
points)
|
Percentage
Change in Net Interest Income
(12
Months)
|
+300
|
6.75%
|
+200
|
4.58%
|
+100
|
2.35%
|
-100
|
(2.46)%
|
-200
|
(5.05)%
|
-300
|
(7.76)%
|
The following table shows CTBI’s
estimated earnings sensitivity profile as of December 31, 2006:
Change
in Interest Rates
(basis
points)
|
Percentage
Change in Net Interest Income
(12
Months)
|
+300
|
8.12%
|
+200
|
5.42%
|
+100
|
2.73%
|
-100
|
(2.68)%
|
-200
|
(5.52)%
|
-300
|
(8.54)%
|
The simulation model used the yield
curve spread evenly over a twelve-month period. The measurement at
December 31, 2007 estimates that our net interest income in an up-rate
environment would increase by 6.75% at a 300 basis point change, 4.58% increase
at a 200 basis point change, and a 2.35% increase at a 100 basis point
change. In a down-rate environment, a 300 basis point immediate and
sustained decrease in interest rates would decrease net interest income by 7.76%
over one year, a 5.05% decrease at a 200 basis point change, and a 2.46%
decrease at a 100 basis point change. In order to reduce the exposure
to interest rate fluctuations and to manage liquidity, we have developed sale
procedures for several types of interest-sensitive assets. Virtually
all long-term, fixed rate single family residential mortgage loans underwritten
according to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation guidelines are sold for cash
upon origination. Periodically, additional assets such as commercial
loans are also sold. In 2007 and 2006, $74.6 million and $64.9
million, respectively, was realized on the sale of fixed rate residential
mortgages. We focus our efforts on consistent net interest revenue
and net interest margin growth through each of the retail and wholesale business
lines. We do not currently engage in trading activities.
The preceding analysis was prepared
using a rate ramp analysis which attempts to spread changes evenly over a
specified time period as opposed to a rate shock which measures the impact of an
immediate change. Had these measurements been prepared using the rate
shock method, the results would vary.
Our Static Repricing GAP as of December
31, 2007 is presented below. In the 12 month repricing GAP, rate
sensitive liabilities (“RSL”) exceeded rate sensitive assets (“RSA”) by $138.7
million.
1-3
Months
|
4-6
Months
|
7-9
Months
|
10-12
Months
|
2-3
Years
|
4-5
Years
|
>
5
Years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 1,219,263 | $ | 187,052 | $ | 128,033 | $ | 133,015 | $ | 576,584 | $ | 233,004 | $ | 425,735 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities
and
equity
|
667,317 | 315,210 | 334,151 | 489,347 | 682,927 | 20,914 | 392,819 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repricing
difference
|
551,946 | (128,158 | ) | (206,118 | ) | (356,335 | ) | (106,343 | ) | 212,091 | 32,916 | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
GAP
|
551,946 | 423,788 | 217,670 | (138,664 | ) | (245,007 | ) | (32,916 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
RSA/RSL
|
1.83 | x | 0.59 | x | 0.38 | x | 0.27 | x | 0.84 | x | 11.14 | x | 1.08 | x | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative
GAP to total assets
|
19.02 | % | 14.60 | % | 7.50 | % | (4.78 | )% | (8.44 | )% | (1.13 | )% | 0.00 | % |
25
Capital
Resources
We continue to grow our shareholders’
equity while also providing an average annual dividend yield during 2007 of
4.00% to shareholders. Shareholders’ equity increased 6.7% from
December 31, 2006 to $301.4 million at December 31, 2007. Our primary
source of capital growth is retained earnings. Cash dividends were
$1.10 per share for 2007 and $1.05 per share for 2006. We retained
54.5% of our earnings in 2007 compared to 59.5% in 2006.
Regulatory guidelines require bank
holding companies, commercial banks, and savings banks to maintain certain
minimum capital ratios and define companies as “well-capitalized” that
sufficiently exceed the minimum ratios. The banking regulators may
alter minimum capital requirements as a result of revising their internal
policies and their ratings of individual institutions. To be
“well-capitalized” banks and bank holding companies must maintain a Tier 1
leverage ratio of no less than 5.0%, a Tier 1 risk based ratio of no less than
6.0%, and a total risk based ratio of no less than 10.0%. Our ratios
as of December 31, 2007 were 10.32%, 13.24%, and 14.49%,
respectively. Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and it subsidiaries met
the criteria for “well-capitalized” at December 31, 2007. See note 20
to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
As of December 31, 2007, we are not
aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if
they were to be implemented, would have, or are reasonably likely to have, a
material adverse impact on our liquidity, capital resources, or
operations.
Impact
of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Local Economic Conditions
The majority of our assets and
liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, CTBI differs greatly
from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments
in non-monetary assets, such as fixed assets and
inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the
growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase
equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate
equity to assets ratio. Inflation also affects other expenses, which
tend to rise during periods of general inflation.
We believe the most significant impact
on financial and operating results is our ability to react to changes in
interest rates. We seek to maintain an essentially balanced position
between interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against
the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.
Our success is dependent on the general
economic conditions of the communities we serve. Unlike larger banks
that are more geographically diversified, we provide financial and banking
services primarily to eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky
and southern West Virginia. The economic conditions in these areas have a
significant impact on loan demand, the ability of borrowers to repay loans, and
the value of the collateral securing loans. A significant decline in
general economic conditions will affect these local economic conditions and will
negatively affect the financial results of our banking
operations. Factors influencing general conditions include inflation,
recession, unemployment, and other factors beyond our control.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
As disclosed in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements, we have certain obligations and commitments
to make future payments under contracts. At December 31, 2007, the
aggregate contractual obligations and commitments are:
Contractual
Obligations:
|
Payments
Due by Period
|
|||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Total
|
1
Year
|
2-5
Years
|
After
5 Years
|
||||||||||||
Deposits
without stated maturity
|
$ | 1,104,680 | $ | 1,104,680 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
1,188,484 | 1,065,130 | 121,843 | 1,511 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements and other short-term borrowings
|
177,344 | 148,375 | 28,969 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
40,906 | 40,179 | 689 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank*
|
1,178 | 1,143 | 31 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
61,341 | 0 | 0 | 61,341 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt*
|
117,983 | 3,999 | 15,998 | 97,986 | ||||||||||||
Annual
rental commitments under leases
|
10,483 | 1,472 | 4,095 | 4,916 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,702,399 | $ | 2,364,978 | $ | 171,625 | $ | 165,796 |
*The
amounts provided as interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank and
interest on long-term debt assume the liabilities will not be prepaid and
interest is calculated to their individual maturities.
Other
Commitments:
|
Amount
of Commitment - Expiration by Period
|
|||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Total
|
1
Year
|
2-5
Years
|
After
5 Years
|
||||||||||||
Standby
letters of credit
|
$ | 57,241 | $ | 50,509 | $ | 6,732 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
388,404 | 329,611 | 53,783 | 5,010 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 445,645 | $ | 380,121 | $ | 60,514 | $ | 5,010 |
Commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements
in that these commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
CTBI currently does not engage in any
hedging activity or any derivative activity which management considers
material. Analysis of CTBI’s interest rate sensitivity can be found
in the Liquidity and Market Risk section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
26
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(dollars
in thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 105,209 | $ | 95,438 | ||||
Federal
funds sold
|
32,041 | 62,100 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
137,250 | 157,538 | ||||||
Securities
available-for-sale at fair value
|
||||||||
(amortized
cost of $325,879 and $430,867, respectively)
|
324,153 | 425,851 | ||||||
Securities
held-to-maturity at amortized cost
|
||||||||
(fair
value of $32,350 and $39,015, respectively)
|
32,959 | 40,508 | ||||||
Loans
held for sale
|
2,334 | 1,431 | ||||||
Loans
|
2,227,897 | 2,167,458 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan and lease losses
|
(28,054 | ) | (27,526 | ) | ||||
Net
loans
|
2,199,843 | 2,139,932 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
53,391 | 55,665 | ||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
28,060 | 28,027 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
65,059 | 65,059 | ||||||
Core
deposit intangible (net of accumulated amortization of $5,588
and
|
||||||||
$4,953,
respectively)
|
1,917 | 2,551 | ||||||
Bank
owned life insurance
|
23,285 | 20,937 | ||||||
Mortgage
servicing rights
|
3,258 | 3,390 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
31,175 | 28,872 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 2,902,684 | $ | 2,969,761 | ||||
Liabilities
and shareholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
||||||||
Noninterest bearing
|
$ | 449,861 | $ | 429,994 | ||||
Interest bearing
|
1,843,303 | 1,911,173 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
2,293,164 | 2,341,167 | ||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
158,980 | 161,630 | ||||||
Federal
funds purchased and other short-term borrowings
|
18,364 | 15,940 | ||||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
40,906 | 81,245 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
61,341 | 61,341 | ||||||
Deferred
tax liability
|
7,103 | 4,999 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
21,471 | 21,064 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,601,329 | 2,687,386 | ||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000;
|
||||||||
shares outstanding 2007 – 15,044,124; 2006 – 15,158,176
|
75,221 | 75,791 | ||||||
Capital
surplus
|
149,005 | 150,965 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
78,251 | 58,879 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
(1,122 | ) | (3,260 | ) | ||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
301,355 | 282,375 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 2,902,684 | $ | 2,969,761 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
27
Consolidated
Statements of Income
(in
thousands except per share data)
Year
Ended December 31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans, including loans held for sale
|
$ | 171,307 | $ | 163,194 | $ | 137,291 | ||||||
Interest
and dividends on securities
|
||||||||||||
Taxable
|
17,384 | 18,916 | 17,555 | |||||||||
Tax
exempt
|
1,915 | 2,064 | 2,104 | |||||||||
Interest
and dividends on Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
stock
|
1,794 | 1,588 | 1,337 | |||||||||
Other,
including interest on federal funds sold
|
4,464 | 3,543 | 2,035 | |||||||||
Total
interest income
|
196,864 | 189,305 | 160,322 | |||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
on deposits
|
75,637 | 63,856 | 43,012 | |||||||||
Interest
on repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings
|
8,429 | 8,620 | 3,819 | |||||||||
Interest
on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
2,402 | 3,648 | 4,872 | |||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
4,364 | 5,414 | 5,414 | |||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
90,832 | 81,538 | 57,117 | |||||||||
Net
interest income
|
106,032 | 107,767 | 103,205 | |||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
6,540 | 4,305 | 8,285 | |||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
99,492 | 103,462 | 94,920 | |||||||||
Noninterest
income:
|
||||||||||||
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
21,003 | 20,162 | 18,050 | |||||||||
Gains
on sales of loans, net
|
1,338 | 1,265 | 1,481 | |||||||||
Trust
income
|
4,859 | 3,743 | 3,067 | |||||||||
Loan
related fees
|
3,196 | 2,473 | 5,638 | |||||||||
Bank
owned life insurance
|
1,108 | 1,035 | 0 | |||||||||
Securities
gains
|
0 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||
Other
|
5,104 | 3,881 | 5,228 | |||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
36,608 | 32,559 | 33,467 | |||||||||
Noninterest
expense:
|
||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
42,298 | 44,145 | 42,535 | |||||||||
Occupancy,
net
|
6,713 | 6,420 | 6,387 | |||||||||
Equipment
|
4,896 | 5,047 | 4,352 | |||||||||
Data
processing
|
4,951 | 3,733 | 4,479 | |||||||||
Bank
franchise tax
|
3,464 | 3,261 | 3,025 | |||||||||
Legal
and professional fees
|
3,178 | 2,816 | 2,855 | |||||||||
Other
|
17,555 | 14,985 | 14,936 | |||||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
83,055 | 80,407 | 78,569 | |||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
53,045 | 55,614 | 49,818 | |||||||||
Income
taxes
|
16,418 | 16,550 | 15,406 | |||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 36,627 | $ | 39,064 | $ | 34,412 | ||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2.42 | $ | 2.59 | $ | 2.31 | ||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
2.38 | 2.55 | 2.27 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
28
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
(in
thousands except per share and
share
amounts)
|
Common
Shares
|
Common
Stock
|
Capital
Surplus
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2005
|
14,845,217 | $ | 74,226 | $ | 145,023 | $ | 15,874 | $ | 1,046 | $ | 236,169 | |||||||||||||
Net
income
|
34,412 | 34,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
change in unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of
tax of $2,898
|
(5,381 | ) | (5,381 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
29,031 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared ($0.98 per share)
|
(14,619 | ) | (14,619 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
152,152 | 761 | 2,603 | 3,364 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
14,997,369 | 74,987 | 147,626 | 35,667 | (4,335 | ) | 253,945 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
39,064 | 39,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
change in unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of
tax of ($579)
|
1,075 | 1,075 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
40,139 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared ($1.05 per share)
|
(15,852 | ) | (15,852 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
160,807 | 804 | 2,378 | 3,182 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation and related excess tax benefits
|
961 | 961 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
15,158,176 | 75,791 | 150,965 | 58,879 | (3,260 | ) | 282,375 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
36,627 | 36,627 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
change in unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of
tax of ($1,152)
|
2,138 | 2,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
38,765 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
effect – application of new accounting standards (SFAS 156 and FIN
48)
|
(621 | ) | (621 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared ($1.10 per share)
|
(16,634 | ) | (16,634 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
82,448 | 412 | 2,348 | 2,760 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of common stock
|
(196,500 | ) | (982 | ) | (5,203 | ) | (6,185 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation and related excess tax benefits
|
895 | 895 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
15,044,124 | $ | 75,221 | $ | 149,005 | $ | 78,251 | $ | (1,122 | ) | $ | 301,355 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
29
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(in
thousands)
Year
Ended December 31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 36,627 | $ | 39,064 | $ | 34,412 | ||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,665 | 5,819 | 5,141 | |||||||||
Change
in net deferred tax liability
|
955 | 4,193 | 745 | |||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
649 | 711 | 0 | |||||||||
Excess
tax benefits of stock-based compensation
|
245 | 250 | 0 | |||||||||
Provision
for loan and other real estate losses
|
6,979 | 4,616 | 8,410 | |||||||||
Securities
gains
|
0 | 0 | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Gains
on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
|
(1,338 | ) | (1,265 | ) | (1,493 | ) | ||||||
Losses
on sale of other loans
|
0 | 0 | 13 | |||||||||
Gains
(losses) on sale of assets, net
|
65 | (5 | ) | (28 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds
from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
|
74,578 | 64,943 | 66,883 | |||||||||
Funding
of mortgage loans held for sale
|
(74,143 | ) | (64,974 | ) | (65,525 | ) | ||||||
Amortization
of securities premiums, net
|
518 | 957 | 1,682 | |||||||||
Change
in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
|
(957 | ) | (868 | ) | (635 | ) | ||||||
Amortization/impairment
of mortgage servicing rights
|
0 | 591 | 330 | |||||||||
Fair
value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights
|
558 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Amortization/write-off
of debt issuance costs
|
1,950 | 87 | 87 | |||||||||
Changes
in:
|
||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
(504 | ) | 4,401 | 1,131 | ||||||||
Other
assets
|
(851 | ) | (2,787 | ) | (9,819 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
50,996 | 55,733 | 41,331 | |||||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from sales
|
130,400 | 128,900 | 53,850 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from prepayments and maturities
|
48,315 | 58,754 | 106,721 | |||||||||
Purchase
of securities
|
(74,177 | ) | (218,446 | ) | (108,082 | ) | ||||||
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from prepayments and maturities
|
7,481 | 7,800 | 13,966 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of loans
|
0 | 0 | 105 | |||||||||
Change
in loans, net
|
(73,690 | ) | (68,573 | ) | (141,253 | ) | ||||||
Purchase
of premises, equipment, and other real estate
|
(2,757 | ) | (3,197 | ) | (5,321 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of premises and equipment
|
18 | 378 | 32 | |||||||||
Additional
investment in equity securities
|
(33 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Redemption
of investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
1,841 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Investment
in unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
(1,841 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of other real estate and repossessed assets
|
3,173 | 2,821 | 2,698 | |||||||||
Additions
in other real estate owned
|
(21 | ) | (73 | ) | (327 | ) | ||||||
Additional
investment in bank owned life insurance
|
(1,391 | ) | 0 | 3,885 | ||||||||
Net
assets acquired
|
0 | 0 | (4,313 | ) | ||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
37,318 | (91,636 | ) | (78,039 | ) |
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Change
in deposits, net
|
(48,003 | ) | 94,616 | 36,317 | ||||||||
Change
in repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings,
net
|
(226 | ) | 30,929 | 53,997 | ||||||||
Payments
on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
(40,339 | ) | (41,589 | ) | (50,056 | ) | ||||||
Payment
for redemption of junior subordinated debentures
|
(61,341 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Issuance
of junior subordinated debentures
|
61,341 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
2,760 | 3,182 | 3,364 | |||||||||
Purchase
of common stock
|
(6,185 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Excess
tax benefits of stock-based compensation
|
(245 | ) | (250 | ) | 0 | |||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(16,364 | ) | (15,658 | ) | (14,283 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(108,602 | ) | 71,230 | 29,339 | ||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(20,288 | ) | 35,327 | (7,369 | ) | |||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
157,538 | 122,211 | 129,580 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 137,250 | $ | 157,538 | $ | 122,211 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
||||||||||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | 10,913 | $ | 13,763 | $ | 18,497 | ||||||
Interest
paid
|
91,237 | 79,624 | 55,338 | |||||||||
Non-cash
activities
|
||||||||||||
Loans
to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned
|
730 | 713 | 859 | |||||||||
Common
stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter
|
16,635 | 15,852 | 14,619 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
30
1. Accounting
Policies
Basis of Presentation – The
consolidated financial statements include Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”)
and its subsidiaries, including its principal subsidiary, Community Trust Bank,
Inc. (the “Bank”). Intercompany transactions and accounts have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Nature of Operations –
Substantially all assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses are related to
banking operations, including lending, investing of funds, obtaining of
deposits, trust operations, full service brokerage operations, and other
financing activities. All of our business offices and the majority of
our business are located in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central
Kentucky and southern West Virginia.
Use of Estimates – In
preparing the consolidated financial statements, management must make certain
estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the
amounts reported for assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as
affecting the disclosures provided. Future results could differ from
the current estimates. Such estimates include, but are not limited
to, the allowance for loan and lease losses, fair value of securities and
mortgage servicing rights, and goodwill (the excess of cost over net assets
acquired).
Cash and Cash Equivalents –
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, interest
bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds
sold. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day
periods.
Investments – Management determines
the classification of securities at purchase. We classify securities
into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale
categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the
positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized
cost. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, investments in
debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity and equity
securities that have readily determinable fair values shall be classified in one
of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of
financial position:
a. Trading securities.
Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them
in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified
as trading securities.
Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading
securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on
short-term differences in price.
b. Available-for-sale
securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as
held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale
securities.
We do not
have any securities that are classified as trading
securities. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of
shareholders’ equity, net of tax. If declines in fair value are not
temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as
a realized loss.
Gains or losses on disposition of securities are computed by specific identification for all securities except for shares in mutual funds, which are computed by average cost. Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.
Loans – Loans with the ability
and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the
carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest and an allowance
for loan and lease losses. Income is recorded on the level yield
basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes,
after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and
collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that
collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days
past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue
accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans
generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded
once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not
reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments are brought
current and future payments appear reasonably certain.
Loan origination and commitment fees
and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount
amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments
as a yield adjustment.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
– We
maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that is
appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans
determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the
remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. Since arriving at an
appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, we use an
ongoing quarterly analysis to develop a range of estimated losses. In
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
we use our best estimate within the range of potential credit loss to determine
the appropriate ALLL. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are
credited to the ALLL.
We utilize an internal risk grading
system for commercial credits. Those larger commercial credits that
exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual
review. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage,
and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are
evaluated. The review of individual loans includes those loans that
are impaired as provided in SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan. We evaluate the collectibility of both
principal and interest when assessing the need for loss
provision. Historical loss rates are applied to other commercial
loans not subject to specific allocations. The loss rates are
determined from a migration analysis which computes the net charge off
experience on loans according to their internal risk grade.
Homogenous loans, such as consumer
installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually
risk graded. The associated ALLL for these loans is measured under
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. The ALLL allocation for these pools of loans is
established based on the average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios over
the previous eight quarters.
Historical loss rates for commercial
and retail loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s
judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss
recognition. Factors that we consider include delinquency trends,
current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and
administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of
recoveries to prior year's charge offs, trend in loan losses, industry
concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and
underwriting exceptions. These factors are reviewed quarterly and a
weighted range developed with a “most likely” scenario
determined. The total of each of these weighted factors is then
applied against the applicable portion of the portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted
accordingly.
31
Loans Held for Sale – Mortgage
loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at
the lower of cost or estimated market value in the aggregate. Net
unrealized losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance by charges to
income.
Premises and Equipment –
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Capital leases are included in premises and equipment
at the capitalized amount less accumulated amortization. Premises and
equipment are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis.
Depreciation and amortization are
computed primarily using the straight-line method. Estimated useful
lives range up to 40 years for buildings, 2 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures,
and equipment, and up to the lease term for leasehold
improvements. Capitalized leased assets are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the lives of the respective leases.
Other Real Estate – Real
estate acquired by foreclosure is carried at the lower of the investment in the
property or its fair value. Other real estate owned by CTBI included
in other assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $7.9 million and $4.5 million,
respectively.
Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible
– We
evaluate total goodwill and core deposit intangible for impairment, based upon
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets and SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial
Institutions, using fair value techniques including multiples of
price/equity. Goodwill and core deposit intangible are evaluated for
impairment on an annual basis or as other events may warrant.
Amortization of core deposit intangible
is estimated at approximately $0.6 million annually for the next two years,
approximately $0.4 million in year three, and approximately $0.1 million in
years four and five.
Income Taxes – Income
tax expense is based on the taxes due on the consolidated tax return plus
deferred taxes based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities,
using enacted tax rates.
Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) –
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted EPS adjusts the number of
weighted average shares of common stock outstanding by the dilutive effect of
stock options as prescribed in SFAS No. 123R which is discussed in the New
Accounting Standards section below.
Segments – Management analyzes
the operation of CTBI assuming one operating segment, community banking
services. CTBI, through its operating subsidiaries, offers a wide
range of consumer and commercial community banking services. These
services include: (i) residential and commercial real estate loans; (ii)
checking accounts; (iii) regular and term savings accounts and savings
certificates; (iv) full service securities brokerage services; (v) consumer
loans; (vi) debit cards; (vii) annuity and life insurance products; (viii)
Individual Retirement Accounts and Keogh plans; (ix) commercial loans; (x) trust
services; and (xi) commercial demand deposit accounts.
Bank Owned Life Insurance –
CTBI's bank owned life insurance policies are carried at their cash
surrender value. We recognize tax-free income from the periodic
increases in cash surrender value of these policies and from death
benefits.
Mortgage Servicing Rights –
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are carried at fair market value with the
implementation of SFAS 156 in January 2007. The fair value is
determined quarterly based on an independent third-party valuation using a
discounted cash flow analysis and calculated using a computer pricing
model. The computer valuation is based on key economic assumptions
including the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average
life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted-average coupon, and the
weighted-average default rate, as applicable. MSRs are a component of
other assets. Along with the gains received from the sale of loans,
fees are received for servicing loans. These fees include late fees,
which are recorded in interest income, and ancillary fees and monthly servicing
fees, which are recorded in noninterest income. Costs of servicing
loans are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in fair market
value of the MSRs are reported as an increase or decrease to mortgage banking
income.
32
New Accounting Standards
–
Ø Stock-Based Employee Compensation –
Effective January 1, 2006, CTBI adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the
modified retrospective application basis in accounting for stock-based
compensation plans. Under SFAS No. 123(R), CTBI recognizes
compensation expense for the grant-date fair value of stock-based compensation
issued over its requisite service period. Awards with a graded
vesting are expensed on a straight-line basis. The grant-date fair
value of stock options is measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. Had compensation cost for CTBI’s stock options granted in 2005
been determined under the fair value approach described in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, CTBI’s net income and earnings per share would have been
reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Years
ended December 31
|
2005
|
||||
Net
income as reported
|
$ | 34,412 | |||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
(994 | ) | |||
Tax
effect
|
141 | ||||
Net
income pro forma
|
$ | 33,559 | |||
Basic
net income per share
|
As
reported
|
$ | 2.31 | ||
Pro
forma
|
2.25 | ||||
Diluted
net income per share
|
As
reported
|
$ | 2.27 | ||
Pro
forma
|
2.22 |
Ø Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes – In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes - An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This statement also prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. The evaluation of a tax position in
accordance with this statement is a two-step process. The first step
is a recognition process to determine whether it is more likely than not that a
tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any
related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the
position. The second step is a measurement process whereby a tax
position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is calculated
to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial
statements. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. CTBI adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January
1, 2007. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this
statement was recognized as a $0.6 million adjustment to the beginning balance
of retained earnings. An additional $28 thousand increase to the FIN
48 liability was charged to current income tax expense during the quarter ended
March 31, 2007. The FIN 48 liability is carried in other liabilities
in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2007. Approximately $0.2 million in FIN 48 liability is relative to
state nexus issues. As of September 30, 2007, we reported resolution
of these issues would be completed by March 2008. However, due to
ongoing negotiations with the jurisdiction involved, we now anticipate the
filing of these returns by December 31, 2008. CTBI is subject to
taxation in the United States and various state and local
jurisdictions. For federal tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2004
through 2007 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. For
state and local tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2003 through 2007 are subject
to examination by the tax authorities. CTBI currently recognizes
interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income
tax expense.
Ø Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets – SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets amends SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities – a replacement
of SFAS No. 125, by requiring, in certain situations, an entity to
recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an
obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing
contract. All separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
liabilities are required to be initially measured at fair
value. Subsequent measurement methods include the amortization
method, whereby servicing assets or servicing liabilities are amortized in
proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net
servicing loss or the fair value method, whereby servicing assets or servicing
liabilities are measured at fair value at each reporting date and changes in
fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which they
occur. If the amortization method is used, an entity must assess
servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation
based on the fair value at each reporting date. Adoption of SFAS 156
on January 1, 2007 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
Ø Fair Value Measurements – In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
which provides guidance on how to measure assets and liabilities that use fair
value. SFAS 157 will apply whenever another generally accepted
accounting principle standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be
measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value to any new
circumstances. This statement also will require additional
disclosures in both annual and quarterly reports. SFAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and was adopted by CTBI beginning the first quarter of
2008. This statement will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Ø Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities – In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing
entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities using different measurement
techniques. SFAS 159 requires additional disclosures related to the
fair value measurements included in the entity's financial
statements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after Nov. 15, 2007. Accordingly,
CTBI adopted SFAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008. This statement
will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Ø Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of
Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards – On June 14, 2007, the Emerging
Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits
of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards. This consensus was
ratified by FASB on June 27, 2007. This issue states that tax
benefits received on dividends paid to employees associated with their unvested
stock compensation awards should be recorded in additional paid-in capital
(“APIC”) for awards expected to vest. Currently, such dividends are
accounted for as a permanent tax deduction reducing the annual effective income
tax rate. This issue is to be applied prospectively to dividends
declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2007. Retrospective application of this Issue is
prohibited. Issue No. 06-11 will not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
Ø Business
Combinations (Revised 2007) – The FASB recently issued
SFAS No. 141(R), which replaces FAS 141, Business Combinations, and
applies to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control
over one or more other businesses. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer,
upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets,
liabilities, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as
of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be
recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at
a later date when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a
reasonable doubt. This fair value approach replaces the
cost-allocation process required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an
acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair value. SFAS 141R requires
acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than
allocating such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as was
previously the case under SFAS 141. Under SFAS 141R, the requirements
of SFAS 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, would have to be met
in order to accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase
accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at
fair value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to
materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting,
and instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable
recognition criteria of SFAS 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. SFAS 141R is expected to have a significant
impact on our accounting for business combinations closing on or after January
1, 2009.
Ø Accounting for Deferred Compensation
and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements – EITF Issue
No. 06-4, Accounting for
Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split
Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements requires the recognition of a
liability and related compensation expense for endorsement split-dollar life
insurance policies that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to
post-retirement periods. Under EITF 06-4, life insurance policies
purchased for the purpose of providing such benefits do not effectively settle
an entity’s obligation to the employee. Accordingly, the entity must
recognize a liability and related compensation expense during the employee’s
active service period based on the future cost of insurance to be incurred
during the employee’s retirement. If the entity has agreed to provide the
employee with a death benefit, then the liability for the future death benefit
should be recognized by following the guidance in SFAS 106, Employer’s Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. CTBI adopted
EITF 06-4 effective as of January 1, 2008 as a change in accounting
principle through a $1.8 million cumulative-effect adjustment to retained
earnings.
Reclassification – Certain
reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year
consolidated financial statements to conform to current year
classifications.
33
2. Business
Combinations
On June 10, 2005, Community Trust Bank,
Inc., the bank subsidiary of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., completed the
acquisition of Heritage Community Bank of Danville, Kentucky. All
former Heritage Community Bank offices now operate as branch offices of
Community Trust Bank, Inc. Through this acquisition, we obtained
loans totaling approximately $73.7 million, cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $8.1 million, and deposits totaling approximately $69.8 million
from this acquisition. The total cost of the acquisition, including
direct acquisition costs, was $12.4 million. Goodwill and core
deposit intangible of approximately $5.5 million was recorded. Pro
forma information has not been presented since the impact of the acquisition is
not significant to the consolidated financial statements.
3. Cash
and Due from Banks
Included in cash and due from banks are
noninterest bearing deposits that are required to be held at the Federal Reserve
or maintained in vault cash in accordance with regulatory reserve
requirements. The balance requirements were $38.6 million and $37.8
million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash paid during
the years ended 2007, 2006, and 2005 for interest was $91.2 million, $79.6
million, and $55.1 million, respectively. Cash paid during the same
periods for income taxes was $12.5 million, $12.7 million and $13.1 million,
respectively.
4. Securities
Amortized cost and fair value of
securities at December 31, 2007 are as follows:
Available-for-Sale
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government agencies
|
$ | 20,307 | $ | 429 | $ | 0 | $ | 20,736 | ||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
40,472 | 707 | (42 | ) | 41,137 | |||||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
205,049 | 446 | (2,953 | ) | 202,542 | |||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
20,000 | 0 | (313 | ) | 19,687 | |||||||||||
Total
debt securities
|
285,829 | 1,582 | (3,308 | ) | 284,103 | |||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
40,050 | 0 | 0 | 40,050 | ||||||||||||
$ | 325,879 | $ | 1,582 | $ | (3,308 | ) | $ | 324,153 |
Held-to-Maturity
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
$ | 1,901 | $ | 13 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,914 | ||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
31,058 | 0 | (622 | ) | 30,436 | |||||||||||
$ | 32,959 | $ | 13 | $ | (622 | ) | $ | 32,350 |
Amortized cost and fair value of
securities at December 31, 2006 are as follows:
Available-for-Sale
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government agencies
|
$ | 20,291 | $ | 200 | $ | 0 | $ | 20,491 | ||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
44,887 | 709 | (34 | ) | 45,562 | |||||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
245,038 | 430 | (5,878 | ) | 239,590 | |||||||||||
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
20,000 | 0 | (443 | ) | 19,557 | |||||||||||
Total
debt securities
|
330,217 | 1,339 | (6,355 | ) | 325,201 | |||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
100,650 | 0 | 0 | 100,650 | ||||||||||||
$ | 430,867 | $ | 1,339 | $ | (6,355 | ) | $ | 425,851 |
Held-to-Maturity
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
$ | 3,068 | $ | 19 | $ | (255 | ) | $ | 2,832 | |||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
37,440 | 0 | (1,257 | ) | 36,183 | |||||||||||
$ | 40,508 | $ | 19 | $ | (1,512 | ) | $ | 39,015 |
34
The amortized cost and fair value of
securities at December 31, 2007 by contractual maturity are shown
below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or
without call or prepayment penalties.
Available-for-Sale
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 8,625 | $ | 8,675 | $ | 325 | $ | 327 | ||||||||
Due
after one through five years
|
43,811 | 44,711 | 394 | 405 | ||||||||||||
Due
after five through ten years
|
7,946 | 8,090 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Due
after ten years
|
396 | 396 | 1,181 | 1,182 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
|
205,050 | 202,543 | 31,059 | 30,436 | ||||||||||||
Other
securities
|
20,001 | 19,688 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total
debt securities
|
285,829 | 284,103 | 32,959 | 32,350 | ||||||||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
40,050 | 40,050 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
$ | 325,879 | $ | 324,153 | $ | 32,959 | $ | 32,350 |
There were no pre-tax gains or losses
realized on sales and calls in 2007 or 2006, and no significant pre-tax gains or
losses realized on sales and calls in 2005.
Securities in the amount of $333
million and $401 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were
pledged to secure public deposits, trust funds, repurchase agreements, and
advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.
CTBI evaluates its investment portfolio
on a quarterly basis for impairment. The analysis performed as of
December 31, 2007 indicates that all impairment is considered temporary, market
driven, and not credit-related. The following tables provide the
amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by
investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2007.
Available-for-Sale
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
||||||||||||
States
and political subdivision
|
$ | 245 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 242 | |||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
27,000 | (126 | ) | 26,874 | ||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
27,245 | (129 | ) | 27,116 | |||||||||
12
Months or More
|
||||||||||||
States
and political subdivision
|
1,385 | (39 | ) | 1,346 | ||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
145,171 | (2,827 | ) | 142,344 | ||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
20,000 | (313 | ) | 19,687 | ||||||||
166,556 | (3,179 | ) | 163,377 | |||||||||
Total
|
||||||||||||
States
and political subdivision
|
1,630 | (42 | ) | 1,588 | ||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
172,171 | (2,953 | ) | 169,218 | ||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
20,000 | (313 | ) | 19,687 | ||||||||
$ | 193,801 | $ | (3,308 | ) | $ | 190,493 |
Held-to-Maturity
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||
12
Months or More
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
$ | 31,058 | $ | (622 | ) | $ | 30,437 |
The analysis performed as of December
31, 2006 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, due primarily
to fluctuations in interest rates, and not credit-related. The
following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair
value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31,
2006.
35
Available-for-Sale
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||
Less
Than 12 Months
|
||||||||||||
States
and political subdivision
|
$ | 2,828 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 2,818 | |||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
48,272 | (767 | ) | 47,505 | ||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
2,500 | (55 | ) | 2,445 | ||||||||
53,600 | (832 | ) | 52,768 | |||||||||
12
Months or More
|
||||||||||||
States
and political subdivision
|
2,701 | (24 | ) | 2,677 | ||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
174,543 | (5,111 | ) | 169,432 | ||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
17,500 | (388 | ) | 17,112 | ||||||||
194,744 | (5,523 | ) | 189,221 | |||||||||
Total
|
||||||||||||
States
and political subdivision
|
5,529 | (34 | ) | 5,495 | ||||||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
222,815 | (5,878 | ) | 216,937 | ||||||||
Other
debt securities
|
20,000 | (443 | ) | 19,557 | ||||||||
$ | 248,344 | $ | (6,355 | ) | $ | 241,989 |
Held-to-Maturity
(in
thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||
12
Months or More
|
||||||||||||
States
and political subdivision
|
$ | 1,512 | $ | (255 | ) | $ | 1,257 | |||||
U.S.
government sponsored agencies and mortgage-backed pass through
certificates
|
37,440 | (1,257 | ) | 36,183 | ||||||||
$ | 38,952 | $ | (1,512 | ) | $ | 37,440 |
5. Loans
Major classifications of loans, net of
unearned income and deferred loan origination costs, are summarized as
follows:
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Commercial
construction
|
$ | 143,773 | $ | 133,902 | ||||
Commercial
secured by real estate
|
640,574 | 632,881 | ||||||
Commercial
other
|
333,774 | 337,075 | ||||||
Real
estate construction
|
69,021 | 50,588 | ||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
599,665 | 579,197 | ||||||
Consumer
|
435,273 | 422,291 | ||||||
Equipment
lease financing
|
5,817 | 11,524 | ||||||
$ | 2,227,897 | $ | 2,167,458 |
Not included in the loan balances above
were loans held for sale in the amount of $2.3 million and $1.4 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The amount of capitalized
fees and costs under SFAS 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees
and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct
Costs of Leases, included in the above loan totals were $2.0 million and
$1.5 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The amount of loans on a non-accruing
income status was $22.2 million, $9.9 million, and $12.2 million at December 31,
2007, December 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005, respectively. The
total of loans on nonaccrual that were in homogeneous pools and not evaluated
individually for impairment were $3.4 million, $2.6 million, and $4.1
million at December 31, 2007, December 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005,
respectively. Additional interest which would have been recorded
during 2007, 2006, and 2005 if such loans had been accruing interest was
approximately $2.3 million, $1.0 million, and $1.3 million,
respectively. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well
secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing
interest. The amount of loans 90 days past due and still accruing
interest was $9.6 million, $4.3 million, and $8.3 million at December 31, 2007,
December 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005, respectively.
At
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, the recorded investment in impaired loans was
$13.2 million, $7.3 million, and $8.1 million, respectively. Included
in these amounts at December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, were $8.1
million, $4.4 million, and $5.1 million of impaired loans for which specific
reserves for loan losses were carried in the amounts of $3.2 million, $1.5
million, and $2.3 million. The average investment in impaired loans
for 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $13.3 million, $7.4 million, and $9.0 million,
respectively, while interest income of $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and $0.1
million was recognized on cash payments of $11.0 million, $0.9 million, and $1.6
million. Of the cash payments received in 2007, $10.2 million was
related to receivable payments on one revolving line of credit that was placed
on nonaccrual in 2007.
36
6. Mortgage
Banking Activities
Mortgage banking activities primarily
include residential mortgage originations and servicing. As discussed
in note 1 above, mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are carried at fair market
value with the implementation of SFAS 156 in January 2007. The
cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this statement was recognized as
a $26 thousand adjustment to the beginning balance of retained
earnings. The fair value is determined quarterly based on an
independent third-party valuation using a discounted cash flow analysis and
calculated using a computer pricing model. The computer valuation is
based on key economic assumptions including the prepayment speeds of the
underlying loans, the weighted-average life of the loan, the discount rate, the
weighted-average coupon, and the weighted-average default rate, as
applicable. MSRs are a component of other assets. Along
with the gains received from the sale of loans, fees are received for servicing
loans. These fees include late fees, which are recorded in interest
income, and ancillary fees and monthly servicing fees, which are recorded in
noninterest income. Costs of servicing loans are charged to expense
as incurred. Changes in fair market value of the MSRs are reported as
an increase or decrease to mortgage banking income.
The following table presents the
components of mortgage banking income:
(in
thousands)
Year
Ended December 31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Net
gain on sale of loans held for sale
|
$ | 1,338 | $ | 1,265 | $ | 1,480 | ||||||
Net
loan servicing income (expense)
|
||||||||||||
Servicing
fees
|
868 | 892 | 889 | |||||||||
Late
fees
|
64 | 56 | 67 | |||||||||
Ancillary
fees
|
147 | 131 | 230 | |||||||||
Amortization/impairment
(prior to 2007)
|
0 | (591 | ) | (330 | ) | |||||||
Fair
value adjustments
|
(558 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Net
loan servicing income (expense)
|
521 | 488 | 856 | |||||||||
Mortgage
banking income
|
$ | 1,859 | $ | 1,753 | $ | 2,336 |
Mortgage loans serviced for others are
not included in the accompanying balance sheets. At December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005, loans serviced for the benefit of others (primarily FHLMC)
totaled $351 million, $362 million, and $372 million,
respectively. Servicing loans for others generally consists of
collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments
to investors, and processing foreclosures. Custodial escrow balances
maintained in connection with the foregoing loan servicing, and included in
demand deposits, were approximately $539 thousand, $480 thousand, and $510
thousand at December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
Activity for capitalized mortgage
servicing rights using the fair value method in 2007 is a follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
|||
Fair
value, beginning of period
|
$ | 3,416 | ||
New
servicing assets created
|
401 | |||
Change
in fair value during the period due to:
|
||||
Time
decay (1)
|
(182 | ) | ||
Payoffs
(2)
|
(284 | ) | ||
Changes
in valuation inputs or assumptions (3)
|
(93 | ) | ||
Fair
value, end of period
|
$ | 3,258 |
(1)
|
Represents
decrease in value due to regularly scheduled loan principal payments and
partial loan paydowns.
|
(2)
|
Represents
decrease in value due to loans that paid off during the
period.
|
(3)
|
Represents
change in value resulting from market-driven changes in interest
rates.
|
Activity for capitalized mortgage
servicing rights using the amortization method prior to 2007 is as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
$ | 3,660 | $ | 4,225 | ||||
Additions
|
321 | 381 | ||||||
Amortization
to expense
|
(591 | ) | (638 | ) | ||||
Valuation
adjustments
|
0 | (308 | ) | |||||
Balance,
end of year
|
$ | 3,390 | $ | 3,660 |
The fair values of capitalized mortgage
servicing rights were $3.3 million, $3.4 million, and $3.9 million at December
31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Fair values for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 were determined by third-party
valuations using discount rates of 10.10%, 10.61%, and 9.14%, respectively, and
weighted average default rates of 1.6%, 1.3%, and 1.1%,
respectively. The prepayment speeds applied in 2007 were generated by
the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model. The speeds ranged from 7.1% to
26.4%, depending on the stratifications of the specific rights. In
2006 and 2005, Bloomberg PSA speeds ranged from 135% to 389%, and 130% to 327%,
depending on the stratifications of the specific rights. MSR values
are very sensitive to movement in interest rates as expected future net
servicing income depends on the projected balance of the underlying loans, which
can be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. CTBI does not
currently hedge against changes in the fair value of its MSR
portfolio.
37
7. Related
Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, our
banking subsidiary has made extensions of credit and had transactions with
certain directors and executive officers of CTBI or our subsidiaries,
including their associates (as defined by the Securities and Exchange
Commission). We believe such extensions of credit and transactions
were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and
collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions
with other persons. The aggregate amount of related party extensions
of credit at January 1, 2007 was $24.4 million. During 2007, activity
with respect to these extensions of credit included new loans of $1.1 million
and repayment of $5.4 million. As a result of these activities, the
aggregate balance of related party extensions of credit was $20.1 million at
December 31, 2007. The aggregate balances of related party deposits
at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $22.2 million and $28.5 million,
respectively.
8. Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses
Activity in the allowance for loan and
lease losses was as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
$ | 27,526 | $ | 29,506 | $ | 27,017 | ||||||
Provision
charged to operations
|
6,540 | 4,305 | 8,285 | |||||||||
Recoveries
|
2,420 | 3,145 | 3,413 | |||||||||
Charge-offs
|
(8,432 | ) | (9,430 | ) | (10,968 | ) | ||||||
Allowance
of acquired bank
|
0 | 0 | 1,759 | |||||||||
Balance,
end of year
|
$ | 28,054 | $ | 27,526 | $ | 29,506 |
9. Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are summarized
as follows:
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Land
and buildings
|
$ | 66,246 | $ | 64,396 | ||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
5,726 | 5,727 | ||||||
Furniture,
fixtures, and equipment
|
40,140 | 38,934 | ||||||
Construction
in progress
|
1,173 | 1,615 | ||||||
113,285 | 110,672 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(59,894 | ) | (55,007 | ) | ||||
$ | 53,391 | $ | 55,665 |
Depreciation and amortization of
premises and equipment for 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $5.0 million, $5.2 million,
and $4.5 million, respectively.
10. Deposits
Major classifications of deposits are
categorized as follows:
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Noninterest
bearing deposits
|
$ | 449,861 | $ | 429,994 | ||||
NOW
accounts
|
18,663 | 18,107 | ||||||
Money
market deposits
|
447,665 | 472,340 | ||||||
Savings
|
188,491 | 196,923 | ||||||
Certificates
of deposit of $100,000 or more
|
429,756 | 438,080 | ||||||
Certificates
of deposit less than $100,000 and other time deposits
|
758,728 | 785,723 | ||||||
$ | 2,293,164 | $ | 2,341,167 |
Interest expense on deposits is
categorized as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Savings,
NOW, and money market accounts
|
$ | 17,457 | $ | 15,399 | $ | 8,787 | ||||||
Certificates
of deposit of $100,000 or more
|
21,762 | 17,663 | 12,635 | |||||||||
Certificates
of deposit less than $100,000 and other time deposits
|
36,418 | 30,794 | 21,590 | |||||||||
$ | 75,637 | $ | 63,856 | $ | 43,012 |
Maturities of certificates of deposits
and other time deposits are presented below:
Maturities
by Period at December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Total
|
Within
1 Year
|
2
Years
|
3
Years
|
4
Years
|
5
Years
|
After
5 Years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposits of $100,000 or more
|
$ | 429,756 | $ | 395,922 | $ | 23,452 | $ | 6,982 | $ | 2,847 | $ | 453 | $ | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit less than $100,000 and other time deposits
|
758,728 | 682,120 | 46,992 | 15,551 | 7,533 | 5,218 | 1,314 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,188,484 | $ | 1,078,042 | $ | 70,444 | $ | 22,533 | $ | 10,380 | $ | 5,671 | $ | 1,414 |
38
11. Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”)
advances consisted of the following monthly amortizing and term borrowings at
December 31:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Monthly
amortizing
|
$ | 906 | $ | 1,245 | ||||
Term
|
40,000 | 80,000 | ||||||
$ | 40,906 | $ | 81,245 |
The advances from the FHLB that require
monthly principal payments were due for repayment as follows:
Principal
Payments Due by Period at December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Total
|
Within
1 Year
|
2
Years
|
3
Years
|
4
Years
|
5
Years
|
After
5 Years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
advances, weighted average interest rate – 4.06%
|
$ | 906 | 188 | $ | 51 | $ | 613 | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | 38 |
Principal
Payments Due by Period at December 31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Total
|
Within
1 Year
|
2
Years
|
3
Years
|
4
Years
|
5
Years
|
After
5 Years
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
advances, weighted average interest rate – 4.51%
|
$ | 1,245 | $ | 355 | $ | 172 | $ | 51 | $ | 613 | $ | 8 | $ | 46 |
The term advances that require the
total payment to be made at maturity follow:
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Advance
#145, 3.31%, due 8/30/07
|
$ | 0 | $ | 40,000 | ||||
Advance
#146, 3.70%, due 8/30/08
|
40,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
$ | 40,000 | $ | 80,000 |
Advances totaling $40.9 million at
December 31, 2007 were collateralized by FHLB stock of $23.7 million and a
blanket lien on all qualifying 1-4 family first mortgage loans. As of
December 31, 2007, CTBI had a $440 million FHLB borrowing capacity, leaving $399
million available for additional advances. The advances had fixed
interest rates ranging from 1.00% to 6.20% with a weighted average rate of
3.71%. The advances are subject to restrictions or penalties in the
event of prepayment.
12. Borrowings
Short-term debt is categorized as
follows:
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Subsidiaries:
|
||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
$ | 158,980 | $ | 161,630 | ||||
Federal
funds purchased
|
18,364 | 15,940 | ||||||
$ | 177,344 | $ | 177,570 |
On April 28, 2007, we entered into a
revolving note agreement for a line of credit in the amount of $12 million, all
of which is currently available to meet any future cash needs. The
agreement will mature on April 30, 2008. We expect to renew this
agreement upon maturity.
All federal funds purchased and the
majority of repurchase agreements mature and reprice daily. The
average rates paid for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements on
December 31, 2007 were 3.86% and 3.99%, respectively.
The maximum balance for federal funds
purchased and repurchase agreements at any month-end during 2007 occurred at
August 31, 2007, with a month-end balance of $203.6 million.
Long-term debt is categorized as
follows:
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Parent:
|
||||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures, 9.00%, due 3/31/27
|
$ | 0 | $ | 35,568 | ||||
Junior
subordinated debentures, 8.25%, due 3/31/32
|
0 | 25,773 | ||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures, 6.52%, due 6/1/37
|
61,341 | 0 | ||||||
$ | 61,341 | $ | 61,341 |
On March 31, 2007, CTBI issued $61.3
million in junior subordinated debentures to a newly formed unconsolidated
Delaware statutory trust subsidiary which in turn issued $59.5 million of
capital securities in a private placement to institutional
investors. The debentures, which mature in 30 years but are
redeemable at par at CTBI’s option after five years, were issued at a rate of
6.52% until June 1, 2012, and thereafter at a floating rate based on the
three-month LIBOR plus 1.59%. The underlying capital securities were
issued at the equivalent rates and terms. The proceeds of the
debentures were used to fund the redemption on April 2, 2007 of all CTBI’s
outstanding 9.0% and 8.25% junior subordinated debentures in the total amount of
$61.3 million.
39
13. Federal
Income Taxes
The components of the provision for
income taxes, exclusive of tax effect of unrealized securities gains, are as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Current
income taxes
|
$ | 15,463 | $ | 12,357 | $ | 14,661 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
955 | 4,193 | 745 | |||||||||
$ | 16,418 | $ | 16,550 | $ | 15,406 |
A reconciliation of income tax expense
at the statutory rate to our actual income tax expense is shown
below:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Computed
at the statutory rate
|
$ | 18,428 | 35.00 | % | $ | 19,465 | 35.00 | % | $ | 17,436 | 35.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Increase
(decrease) resulting from
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt
interest
|
(818 | ) | (1.55 | ) | (869 | ) | (1.56 | ) | (916 | ) | (1.84 | ) | ||||||||||||
Housing
and new markets credit
|
(437 | ) | (0.83 | ) | (437 | ) | (0.79 | ) | (406 | ) | (0.81 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends
received deduction
|
(1,310 | ) | (2.49 | ) | (1,313 | ) | (2.36 | ) | (361 | ) | (0.72 | ) | ||||||||||||
Bank
owned life insurance
|
(339 | ) | (0.64 | ) | (362 | ) | (0.65 | ) | (203 | ) | (0.41 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other,
net
|
894 | 1.69 | 66 | 0.12 | (144 | ) | (0.29 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 16,418 | 31.18 | % | $ | 16,550 | 29.76 | % | $ | 15,406 | 30.93 | % |
The components of the net deferred tax
liability as of December 31 are as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
||||||||
Allowance
for loan and lease losses
|
$ | 9,209 | $ | 9,018 | ||||
Interest
on nonperforming loans
|
797 | 699 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
439 | 582 | ||||||
Capitalized
lease obligations
|
446 | 546 | ||||||
Dealer
reserve valuation
|
701 | 622 | ||||||
Unrealized
losses on available-for-sale securities
|
606 | 1,755 | ||||||
Other
|
503 | 487 | ||||||
Total
deferred tax assets
|
12,701 | 13,709 | ||||||
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
(11,129 | ) | (9,989 | ) | ||||
FHLB
stock dividends
|
(4,430 | ) | (4,430 | ) | ||||
Loan
fee income
|
(2,703 | ) | (2,764 | ) | ||||
Mortgage
servicing rights
|
(1,140 | ) | (1,186 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(402 | ) | (339 | ) | ||||
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
(19,804 | ) | (18,708 | ) | ||||
Net
deferred tax liability
|
$ | (7,103 | ) | $ | (4,999 | ) |
CTBI adopted the provisions of FIN 48
on January 1, 2007. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions
of this statement was recognized as a $0.6 million adjustment to the beginning
balance of retained earnings. The FIN 48 liability is carried in
other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2007. Approximately $0.2 million in FIN 48 liability is relative to
state nexus issues. As of September 30, 2007, we reported resolution
of these issues would be completed by March 2008. However, due to
ongoing negotiations with the jurisdiction involved, we now anticipate the
filing of these returns by December 31, 2008. CTBI is subject to
taxation in the United States and various state and local
jurisdictions. For federal tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2004
through 2007 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. For
state and local tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2003 through 2007 are subject
to examination by the tax authorities. CTBI currently recognizes
interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income
tax expense.
A reconciliation of the beginning and
ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48 is shown
below:
(in
thousands)
|
2007 | |||
Balance
at January 1, 2007
|
$ | 638 | ||
Additions
based on tax positions related to current year
|
104 | |||
Additions
for tax positions of prior years
|
25 | |||
Reductions
for tax positions of prior years
|
(95 | ) | ||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
$ | 672 |
40
14. Employee
Benefits
On January 1, 2007, CTBI amended its
KSOP Retirement Plan, creating a separate 401(k) Plan and a separate Employee
Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”).
The 401(k) Plan is available to all
employees (age 21 and over) with one year of service and who work at least 1,000
hours per year. Participants in the plan have the option to
contribute from 1% to 15% of their annual compensation. CTBI matches
50% of participant contributions up to 4% of gross pay. CTBI may at its
discretion, contribute an additional percentage of covered employees’
compensation. CTBI’s matching contributions were $1.3 million, $1.2
million, and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
respectfully. The 401(k) Plan owned 569,755, 520,970, and 540,534
shares of CTBI’s common stock at December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectfully. Substantially all shares owned by the 401(k) were
allocated to employee accounts on those dates. The market price of the shares at
the date of allocation is essentially the same as the market price at the date
of purchase.
The ESOP Plan has the same entrance
requirements as the 401(k) Plan above. CTBI currently contributes 4%
of covered employees’ gross compensation to the ESOP. The ESOP uses
the contributions to acquire shares of CTBI’s common stock. CTBI’s
contributions to the ESOP were $0.9 million, $0.9 million, and $0.8 million for
the years ending December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectfully. The
ESOP owned 525,938, 553,758, and 564,859 shares of CTBI’s common stock at
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Substantially all
shares owned by the ESOP were allocated to employee accounts on those
dates. The market price of the shares at the date of allocation is
essentially the same as the market price at the date of purchase.
Stock-Based
Compensation:
We currently maintain one active and
one inactive incentive stock ownership plan covering key
employees. The 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) was
approved by the Board of Directors and our Shareholders in 2006. The
1998 Stock Option Plan (“1998 Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors and
the Shareholders in 1998. The 1998 Plan was rendered inactive as of
April 26, 2006. As of December 31, 2007, the 1998 Plan had 1,046,831
shares authorized, 151,311 of which were transferred to the 2006
Plan. The 1989 Stock Option Plan (“1989 Plan”) was approved by the
Board of Directors in 1989. The 1989 Plan was inactive during 2007
and the remaining outstanding shares were exercised during 2007. The
1989 Plan is now terminated. The following table provides detail of
the number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock-based
awards and remaining shares available for future issuance under all of CTBI’s
equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007:
Plan
Category (shares
in thousands)
|
Number
of Shares to Be Issued Upon Exercise
|
Weighted
Average Price
|
Shares
Available for Future Issuance
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by shareholders
|
||||
Stock
options
|
689
|
$
21.83
|
1,544
(a)
|
|
Restricted
stock
|
0
(c)
|
(b)
|
(a)
|
|
Performance
units
|
(d)
|
(b)
|
(a)
|
|
Stock
appreciation rights (“SARs”)
|
(e)
|
(b)
|
(a)
|
|
Total
|
1,544
|
(a)
|
Under
the 2006 Plan, 1.5 million shares (plus any shares reserved for issuance
under the 1998 Stock Option Plan) were authorized for issuance as
nonqualified and incentive stock options, SARS, restricted stock and
performance units. As of December 31, 2007, the above shares
remained available for issuance.
|
(b)
|
Not
applicable
|
(c)
|
As
of December 31, 2007, no shares of restricted stock had been
issued. The maximum number of shares of Restricted Stock that
may be granted to a participant during any calendar year is 40,000
shares.
|
(d)
|
No
performance units have been issued. The maximum payment that
can be made pursuant to Performance Units granted to any one Participant
in any calendar year shall be
$250,000.
|
(e)
|
No SARS have been
issued. The maximum number of shares
with respect to which SARs may be granted to a Participant during any
calendar year shall be 100,000
shares.
|
The following table details the shares
available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan at December 31,
2007.
Plan
Category (shares
in thousands)
|
Shares
Available for Future Issuance
|
|||
Shares
authorized for issuance
|
1,500,000 | |||
Shares
transferred from 1998 Plan at adoption
|
145,577 | |||
1998
Plan forfeitures in 2007
|
5,734 | |||
2006
Plan issuances in 2007
|
(113,998 | ) | ||
2006
Plan forfeitures in 2007
|
6,403 | |||
Shares
available for future issuance
|
1,543,716 |
41
CTBI uses the following assumptions,
which are evaluated and revised as necessary, in estimating the grant-date fair
value of each option grant for the year end:
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Expected
option life (in years)
|
7.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | |||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
0.335 | 0.364 | 0.960 | |||||||||
Expected
Dividend yield
|
2.77 | % | 3.21 | % | 3.11 | % | ||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.81 | % | 4.53 | % | 3.92 | % |
For 2007 and 2006, the expected option
life is derived from the “safe-harbor” rules for estimating option life in SFAS
123(R). For 2005, the expected option life was derived from
historical exercise patterns and expected life. The expected
volatility is based on historical volatility of the stock using a historical
look back that approximates the expected life of the option
grant. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of
the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
the grant. CTBI’s stock-based compensation expense for the years 2007
and 2006 was $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectfully.
CTBI’s stock option activity for the
2006 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2007 is summarized as
follows:
December
31
|
2007
|
|||||||
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
0 | $ | 0.00 | |||||
Granted
|
113,998 | 38.95 | ||||||
Exercised
|
0 | 0.00 | ||||||
Forfeited/expired
|
6,403 | 38.95 | ||||||
Outstanding
at end of year
|
107,595 | $ | 38.95 |
The options outstanding at December 31,
2007 had no intrinsic value.
A summary of the status of CTBI’s 2006
Plan for nonvested shares as of December 31, 2007, and changes during the year
ended December 31, 2007, is presented as follows:
Nonvested
Shares
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
||||||
Nonvested
at January 1, 2007
|
0 | $ | 0.00 | |||||
Granted
|
113,998 | 12.74 | ||||||
Vested
|
0 | 0.00 | ||||||
Forfeited
|
6,403 | 12,74 | ||||||
Nonvested
at December 31, 2007
|
107,595 | $ | 12.74 |
The 2006 Plan had options with the
following remaining lives at December 31, 2007:
2006
Option Plan
|
||||||||
Remaining
Life
|
Outstanding
Options
|
Weighted
Average Price
|
||||||
Nine
Years
|
107,595 | $ | 38.95 | |||||
Total
outstanding
|
107,595 | |||||||
Weighted
average price
|
$ | 38.95 |
The weighted-average fair value of
options granted from the 2006 Plan during the year 2007 was $1.5 million or
$12.74 per share, respectively.
42
CTBI’s stock option activity for the
1998 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 is summarized as
follows:
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
632,864 | $ | 23.44 | 621,493 | $ | 20.77 | 614,061 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||||||||
Granted
|
0 | 0.00 | 116,900 | 32.44 | 107,996 | 30.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(45,717 | ) | 21.37 | (96,030 | ) | 16.73 | (61,810 | ) | 14.54 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited/expired
|
(5,734 | ) | 30.38 | (9,499 | ) | 27.65 | (38,754 | ) | 18.99 | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of year
|
581,413 | $ | 23.52 | 632,864 | $ | 23.44 | 621,493 | $ | 20.77 | |||||||||||||||
Exercisable
at end of year
|
380,409 | $ | 19.85 | 170,407 | $ | 17.36 | 115,440 | $ | 16.60 |
The 1998 Plan had options with the
following remaining lives at December 31, 2007:
1998
Option Plan
|
||||||||
Remaining
Life
|
Outstanding
Options
|
Weighted
Average Price
|
||||||
One
year
|
45,603 | $ | 15.36 | |||||
Two
years
|
20,252 | 13.23 | ||||||
Three
years
|
41,594 | 11.83 | ||||||
Four
years
|
161,546 | 19.35 | ||||||
Five
years
|
50,911 | 20.99 | ||||||
Six
years
|
71,433 | 27.81 | ||||||
Seven
years
|
83,972 | 30.88 | ||||||
Eight
years
|
106,102 | 32.44 | ||||||
Total
outstanding
|
581,413 | |||||||
Weighted
average price
|
$ | 23.52 |
The
weighted-average fair value of options granted from the 1998 Plan during the
years 2006 and 2005 was $1.2 million and $1.1 million or $10.51 and $9.72 per
share, respectively. The following table shows the intrinsic values
of options exercised, exercisable, and outstanding for the years ended December
31, 2007, 2006, and 2005:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Options
exercised
|
$ | 701 | $ | 2,460 | $ | 2,295 | ||||||
Options
exercisable
|
2,922 | 4,119 | 1,633 | |||||||||
Outstanding
options
|
2,329 | 11,449 | 6,203 |
A summary of the status of CTBI’s 1998
Plan nonvested shares as of December 31, 2007 and changes during the year ended
December 31, 2007 is presented below:
Nonvested
Shares
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
||||||
Nonvested
at January 1, 2007
|
462,457 | $ | 6.57 | |||||
Granted
|
0 | -- | ||||||
Vested
|
256,529 | 4.91 | ||||||
Forfeited
|
4,924 | 9.11 | ||||||
Nonvested
at December 31, 2007
|
201,004 | $ | 8.62 |
The 1989 Plan has no remaining options
available for grant and terminated during 2007.
CTBI’s stock option activity for the
1989 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 is summarized as
follows:
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
4,832 | $ | 19.33 | 36,619 | $ | 14.65 | 93,645 | $ | 13.29 | |||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(4,832 | ) | 19.33 | (31,787 | ) | 13.94 | (57,026 | ) | 12.42 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited/expired
|
0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of year
|
0 | $ | 0.00 | 4,832 | $ | 19.33 | 36,619 | $ | 14.65 | |||||||||||||||
Exercisable
at end of year
|
0 | $ | 0.00 | 4,832 | $ | 19.33 | 36,619 | $ | 14.65 |
The
following table shows the intrinsic values of options exercised, exercisable,
and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 in the
1989 Plan:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Options
exercised
|
$ | 100 | $ | 704 | $ | 1,228 | ||||||
Options
exercisable
|
0 | 107 | 590 | |||||||||
Outstanding
options
|
0 | 107 | 590 |
The 1989 Plan was terminated prior to
December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006 there
was $1.3 million and $1.0 million, respectfully, of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements
granted under the plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 1.4 years. The total grant-date fair
value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
was $1.3 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Cash
received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $1.7 million, $4.5
million, and $3.5 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit
realized for the tax deductions from option exercises of the share-based payment
arrangements totaled $0.3 million, $0.9 million, and $0.7 million, respectively,
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
43
15. Operating
Leases
Certain premises and equipment are
leased under operating leases. Additionally, certain premises are
leased or subleased to third parties. Minimum non-cancellable rental
payments and rental receipts are as follows:
(in
thousands)
|
Payments
|
Receipts
|
||||||
2008
|
$ | 1,472 | $ | 616 | ||||
2009
|
1,128 | 421 | ||||||
2010
|
1,073 | 391 | ||||||
2011
|
1,057 | 344 | ||||||
2012
|
837 | 252 | ||||||
Thereafter
|
4,916 | 136 | ||||||
$ | 10,483 | $ | 2,160 |
Rental expense net of rental income
under operating leases was $0.7 million in 2007, $0.8 million in 2006, and $0.7
million in 2005.
16. Fair
Market Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions
were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for
which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and Cash Equivalents – The
carrying amount approximates fair value.
Securities – Fair values are based on
quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
Loans (net of the allowance for loan
and lease losses) – The fair value of fixed rate loans and variable rate
mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current
rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit
ratings and for the same remaining maturities. For other variable
rate loans, the carrying amount approximates fair value.
Loans
Held for Sale – The fair value is predetermined based on sale
price.
Federal Reserve Bank Stock – The
carrying value of Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on
the redemption provisions of the Federal Reserve Bank.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock – The
carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on
the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Accrued Interest Receivable – The
carrying amount approximates fair value.
Capitalized Mortgage Servicing Rights –
The fair value is obtained by use of an independent third party.
Deposits – The fair value of deposits
is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently
offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Short-term Borrowings – The carrying
amount approximates fair value.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank –
The fair value of these fixed-maturity advances is estimated by discounting
future cash flows using rates currently offered for advances of similar
remaining maturities.
Long-term
Debt – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using
current rates.
Accrued
Interest Payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Other Financial Instruments – The
estimated fair value for other financial instruments and off-balance sheet loan
commitments approximates cost at December 31, 2007 and
2006. Off-balance sheet loan commitments at December 31, 2007 and
2006 were $445.6 million and $478.9 million, respectively.
Commitments to Extend Credit – The fair
value of commitments to extend credit is based upon the difference between the
interest rate at which we are committed to make the loans and the current rates
at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings
and for the same remaining maturities, adjusted for the estimated volume of loan
commitments actually expected to close. The fair value of such
commitments is not material.
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
Financial
assets
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 137,250 | $ | 137,250 | $ | 157,538 | $ | 157,538 | ||||||||
Securities
|
357,112 | 356,503 | 466,359 | 464,866 | ||||||||||||
Loans
(net of ALLL)
|
2,199,843 | 2,190,123 | 2,139,932 | 2,104,378 | ||||||||||||
Loans
held for sale
|
2,334 | 2,346 | 1,431 | 1,451 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank stock
|
4,323 | 4,323 | 4,290 | 4,290 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
23,737 | 23,737 | 23,737 | 23,737 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
16,732 | 16,732 | 17,321 | 17,321 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized
mortgage servicing rights
|
3,258 | 3,258 | 3,390 | 3,416 | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,744,589 | $ | 2,734,272 | $ | 2,813,998 | $ | 2,776,997 | |||||||||
Financial
liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 2,293,164 | $ | 2,289,822 | $ | 2,341,167 | $ | 2,341,474 | ||||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
177,344 | 178,347 | 177,570 | 177,853 | ||||||||||||
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
40,906 | 40,364 | 81,245 | 78,281 | ||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
61,341 | 55,608 | 61,341 | 60,415 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
6,836 | 6,836 | 7,241 | 7,241 | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,579,591 | $ | 2,570,977 | $ | 2,668,564 | $ | 2,665,264 |
44
17. Off-Balance
Sheet Transactions and Guarantees
The Bank is a party to transactions
with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit in the form of unused
lines of credit. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments.
At December 31, the Bank had the
following off-balance sheet financial instruments, whose approximate contract
amounts represent additional credit risk to CTBI:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Standby
letters of credit
|
$ | 57,241 | $ | 54,823 | ||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
388,404 | 424,034 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 445,645 | $ | 478,857 |
Standby letters of credit represent
conditional commitments to guarantee the performance of a third
party. The credit risk involved is essentially the same as the risk
involved in making loans. At December 31, 2007, we maintained a
credit loss reserve of approximately $6 thousand relating to these financial
standby letters of credit. The reserve coverage calculation was
determined using essentially the same methodology as used for the allowance for
loan and lease losses. Approximately 91% of the total standby letters
of credit are secured, with $44.9 million of the total $57.2 million secured by
cash. Collateral for the remaining secured standby letters of credit
varies but is comprised primarily of accounts receivable, inventory, property,
equipment, and income-producing properties.
Commitments to extend credit are
agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Bank
evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case
basis. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. A portion of the commitments is to extend
credit at fixed rates. Fixed rate loan commitments at December 31,
2007 of $24.0 million had interest rates and terms ranging predominantly from
6.00% to 7.99% and 6 months to 1 year, respectively. These credit
commitments were based on prevailing rates, terms, and conditions applicable to
other loans being made at December 31, 2007.
18. Concentrations
of Credit Risk
CTBI’s banking subsidiary grants
commercial, residential, and consumer loans to customers primarily located in
eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, northeastern
Tennessee and southern West Virginia. The Bank is continuing to
manage all components of its portfolio mix in a manner to reduce risk from
changes in economic conditions. Concentrations of credit, as defined for
regulatory purposes, are reviewed quarterly by management to ensure that
internally established limits based on Tier 1 Capital plus the allowance for
loan and lease losses are not exceeded. At December 31, 2007 and
2006, our concentrations of hotel/motel industry credits were 40% and 43% of
Tier 1 Capital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses,
respectively. Lessors of residential buildings and
dwellings credits at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were 30% and 28% of Tier 1
Capital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses,
respectively. Single family construction credits at December 31, 2007
and 2006 based on established limits were 26% and 25% of Tier 1 Capital plus the
allowance for loan and lease losses, respectively. Floorplan credits
at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were 23% and 22% of Tier 1 Capital plus the
allowance for loan and lease losses, respectively. Coal mining and
related support industries credits at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were 22% and
33% of Tier 1 Capital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses,
respectively. These percentages are within our internally established
limits regarding concentrations of credit.
19. Commitments
and Contingencies
CTBI and our subsidiaries, and from
time to time, our officers, are named defendants in legal actions arising from
ordinary business activities. Management, after consultation with
legal counsel, believes any pending actions are without merit or that the
ultimate liability, if any, will not materially affect our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
45
20. Regulatory
Matters
Our principal source of funds is
dividends received from our subsidiary bank. Regulations limit the
amount of dividends that may be paid by our banking subsidiary without prior
approval. During 2008, approximately $44.1 million plus any 2008 net
profits can be paid by our banking subsidiary without prior regulatory
approval.
The Federal Reserve Bank adopted
quantitative measures which assign risk weightings to assets and off-balance
sheet items and also define and set minimum regulatory capital requirements
(risk based capital ratios). All banks are required to have a minimum
Tier 1 (core capital) leverage ratio of 4% of adjusted quarterly average assets,
Tier 1 capital of at least 4% of risk-weighted assets, and total capital of at
least 8% of risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital consists principally
of shareholders’ equity including capital-qualifying subordinated debt but
excluding unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, less
goodwill and certain other intangibles. Total capital consists of
Tier 1 capital plus certain debt instruments and the reserve for credit losses,
subject to limitation. Failure to meet certain capital requirements
can initiate certain actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a
direct material effect on our consolidated financial statements. The
regulations also define well-capitalized levels of Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1, and
total capital as 5%, 6%, and 10%, respectively. We had Tier 1
leverage, Tier 1, and total capital ratios above the well-capitalized levels at
December 31, 2007 and 2006. We believe, as of December 31, 2007, CTBI
meets all capital adequacy requirements for which it is subject to be defined as
well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action.
Under the current Federal Reserve
Board’s regulatory framework, certain capital securities offered by wholly owned
unconsolidated trust preferred entities of CTBI are included as Tier 1
regulatory capital. On March 1, 2005, the Federal Reserve Board
adopted a final rule that allows the continued limited inclusion of trust
preferred securities in the Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies
(“BHCs”). Under the final rule, trust preferred securities and other
restricted core capital elements are subject to stricter quantitative
limits. The Board's final rule limits restricted core capital
elements to 25 percent of all core capital elements, net of goodwill less any
associated deferred tax liability. Internationally active BHCs,
defined as those with consolidated assets greater than $250 billion or
on-balance sheet foreign exposure greater than $10 billion, are subject to a 15
percent limit, but they may include qualifying mandatory convertible preferred
securities up to the generally applicable 25 percent limit. Amounts
of restricted core capital elements in excess of these limits generally may be
included in Tier 2 capital. The final rule provides a five-year
transition period, ending March 31, 2009, for application of the quantitative
limits. The requirement for trust preferred securities to include a
call option has been eliminated, and standards for the junior subordinated debt
underlying trust preferred securities eligible for Tier 1 capital treatment have
been clarified. The final rule addresses supervisory concerns,
competitive equity considerations, and the accounting for trust preferred
securities. The final rule also strengthens the definition of regulatory capital
by incorporating longstanding Board policies regarding the acceptable terms of
capital instruments included in banking organizations' Tier 1 or Tier 2
capital. The final rule did not have a material impact on our
regulatory ratios.
Consolidated
Capital Ratios
Actual
|
For
Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
To
Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
Provision
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
average assets)
|
$ | 294,472 | 10.32 | % | $ | 114,136 | 4.00 | % | $ | 142,671 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
294,472 | 13.24 | 88,964 | 4.00 | 133,447 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
322,243 | 14.49 | 177,912 | 8.00 | 222,390 | 10.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2006:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
average assets)
|
$ | 276,898 | 9.58 | % | $ | 115,615 | 4.00 | % | $ | 144,519 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
276,898 | 12.21 | 90,712 | 4.00 | 136,068 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
304,594 | 13.43 | 181,441 | 8.00 | 226,801 | 10.00 |
Community
Trust Bank, Inc.'s Capital Ratios
Actual
|
For
Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
To
Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
Provision
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
average assets)
|
$ | 285,211 | 10.02 | % | $ | 113,857 | 4.00 | % | $ | 142,321 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
285,211 | 12.84 | 88,851 | 4.00 | 133,276 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
312,982 | 14.09 | 177,704 | 8.00 | 222,131 | 10.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2006:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
average assets)
|
$ | 267,974 | 9.30 | % | $ | 115,258 | 4.00 | % | $ | 144,072 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier
1 capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
267,974 | 11.83 | 90,608 | 4.00 | 135,912 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(to
risk weighted assets)
|
295,670 | 13.05 | 181,254 | 8.00 | 226,567 | 10.00 |
46
21. Parent
Company Financial Statements
Condensed
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands)
December
31
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
on deposit
|
$ | 5,823 | $ | 4,959 | ||||
Investment
in and advances to subsidiaries
|
353,848 | 333,709 | ||||||
Excess
of cost over net assets acquired (net of accumulated
amortization)
|
4,973 | 4,973 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
154 | 1,968 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 364,798 | $ | 345,609 | ||||
Liabilities
and shareholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
Subordinated
debt
|
$ | 61,341 | $ | 61,341 | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
2,102 | 1,893 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
63,443 | 63,234 | ||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
301,355 | 282,375 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 364,798 | $ | 345,609 |
Condensed
Statements of Income
(in
thousands)
Year
Ended December 31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Income:
|
||||||||||||
Dividends
from subsidiary banks
|
$ | 23,380 | $ | 14,410 | $ | 17,160 | ||||||
Other
income
|
1,207 | 42 | 232 | |||||||||
Total
income
|
24,587 | 14,452 | 17,392 | |||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
4,364 | 5,414 | 5,414 | |||||||||
Other
expenses
|
3,163 | 848 | 1,006 | |||||||||
Total
expenses
|
7,527 | 6,262 | 6,420 | |||||||||
Income
before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of
subsidiaries
|
17,060 | 8,190 | 10,972 | |||||||||
Applicable
income taxes
|
(2,184 | ) | (2,123 | ) | (2,167 | ) | ||||||
Income
before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
|
19,244 | 10,313 | 13,139 | |||||||||
Equity
in undistributed income of subsidiaries
|
17,383 | 28,751 | 21,273 | |||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 36,627 | $ | 39,064 | $ | 34,412 |
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
(in
thousands)
Year
Ended December 31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 36,627 | $ | 39,064 | $ | 34,412 | ||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Equity
in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
(17,383 | ) | (28,751 | ) | (21,273 | ) | ||||||
Excess
tax benefit of stock-based compensation
|
245 | 250 | 0 | |||||||||
Change
in other assets and liabilities, net
|
2,646 | 795 | (1,893 | ) | ||||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
22,135 | 11,358 | 11,246 | |||||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Repayment
of investments in and advances to subsidiaries
|
(1,228 | ) | (711 | ) | 0 | |||||||
Redemption
of investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
1,841 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Investment
in unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
(1,841 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Other
|
0 | 2,356 | 0 | |||||||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
(1,228 | ) | 1,645 | 0 | ||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Repayments
of purchased funds and other short-term borrowings
|
(9 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Payment
for redemption of junior subordinated debentures
|
(61,341 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Issuance
of junior subordinated debentures
|
61,341 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
2,760 | 3,182 | 3,364 | |||||||||
Purchase
of common stock
|
(6,185 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Excess
tax benefit of stock-based compensation
|
(245 | ) | (250 | ) | 0 | |||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(16,364 | ) | (15,852 | ) | (14,619 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(20,043 | ) | (12,920 | ) | (11,255 | ) | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
864 | 83 | (9 | ) | ||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
4,959 | 4,876 | 4,885 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 5,823 | $ | 4,959 | $ | 4,876 |
47
22. Earnings
Per Share
The following table sets forth the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Year
Ended December 31
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||
Net income (in
thousands)
|
$ | 36,627 | $ | 39,064 | $ | 34,412 | ||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share:
|
||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares
|
15,150,029 | 15,086,478 | 14,907,706 | |||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share:
|
||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities - stock options
|
222,391 | 213,420 | 231,710 | |||||||||
Adjusted
weighted average shares
|
15,372,420 | 15,299,898 | 15,139,416 | |||||||||
Earnings
per share:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2.42 | $ | 2.59 | $ | 2.31 | ||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
2.38 | 2.55 | 2.27 |
At December 31, 2007, 107,595 stock
options at a price of $38.95 were outstanding and were not used in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise price was
greater than the average market value of the common stock. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, all outstanding stock options were used in the
computation of diluted earnings per share.
23. Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
CTBI has elected to present the
disclosure required by SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income, in the consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders'
Equity. The subtotal Comprehensive income represents total
comprehensive income as defined in the statement. Reclassification
adjustments, related tax effects allocated to changes in equity, and accumulated
other comprehensive income as of and for the years ended December 31 were as
follows:
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment, pretax:
|
||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized net gains (losses) arising during year
|
$ | 3,290 | $ | 1,654 | $ | (8,276 | ) | |||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net gains included in net income
|
0 | 0 | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Change
in unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale
|
$ | 3,290 | $ | 1,654 | $ | (8,279 | ) | |||||
Related
tax effects:
|
||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized net gains (losses) arising during year
|
$ | 1,152 | $ | 579 | $ | (2,897 | ) | |||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net gains included in net income
|
0 | 0 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Change
in net deferred tax liability
|
$ | 1,152 | $ | 579 | $ | (2,898 | ) | |||||
Reclassification
adjustment, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized net gains (losses) arising during year
|
$ | 2,138 | $ | 1,075 | $ | (5,379 | ) | |||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net gains included in net income
|
0 | 0 | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Change
in other comprehensive income
|
$ | 2,138 | $ | 1,075 | $ | (5,381 | ) |
24. FDIC
One-Time Assessment Credit
Effective November 17, 2006, the FDIC
implemented a one-time credit of $4.7 billion to eligible
institutions. The purpose of the credit is to recognize contributions
made by certain institutions to capitalize the Bank Insurance Fund and Savings
Association Insurance Fund, which have now been merged into the Deposit
Insurance Fund. The Bank is an eligible institution and received
notice from the FDIC that its share of the credit is approximately $2.2
million. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $1.2 million remains
as a contingent future credit against future insurance assessment
payments. We anticipate the credit to be fully absorbed during the
fourth quarter 2008 and any remaining expense to be minimal.
48
Audit
Committee, Board of Directors, and Shareholders
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Pikeville,
Kentucky
We have audited the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (Company) as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the two years ended December
31, 2007. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial
statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. Our audits included examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the two years ended December
31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
Unites States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 3, 2008, expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ BKD, LLP
BKD,
LLP
Louisville,
Kentucky
March 3,
2008
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Audit
Committee, Board of Directors and Shareholders
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Pikeville,
Kentucky
We have
audited Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.’s (Company) internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying management report on internal
control. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company,
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the
Company and our report dated March 3, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/ BKD,
LLP
BKD,
LLP
Louisville,
Kentucky
March 3,
2008
49
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Pikeville,
Kentucky
We have audited the accompanying
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) for the
year ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of
operations and cash flows of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries
for the year ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Deloitte
& Touche, LLP
Louisville,
Kentucky
March 9,
2006
50
The Audit Committee of Community Trust
Bancorp, Inc. announced on May 15, 2006 that it engaged BKD, LLP to serve as
CTBI's new independent registered certified public
accountants. Deloitte & Touche, LLP (“Deloitte”) resigned as
CTBI's independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit
Committee accepted Deloitte’s resignation.
The reports of Deloitte on our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 did not
contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or
modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle.
CTBI's management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. As of December 31, 2007, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President/Treasurer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of CTBI's disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2007 were effective in
ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this annual report on
Form 10-K was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely
basis. Additionally, there were no changes in CTBI's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2007
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
CTBI's internal control over financial reporting.
Management's responsibilities related
to establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures
include maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting that
are designed to produce reliable financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. There
have been no significant changes in CTBI's internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to December 31,
2007.
MANAGEMENT
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
We, as management of Community Trust
Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“CTBI”), are responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and
effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and
procedures that:
·
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company;
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
All internal control systems, no matter
how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human
error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even
effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to
financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in
conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over
time.
Because of the inherent limitations,
any system of internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well
designed, may not prevent or detect misstatements due to the possibility that a
control can be circumvented or overridden or that misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur that are not detected. Also, projections of the
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies and procedures included in such controls
may deteriorate.
Management has evaluated the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2007 based on the control criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control—Integrated
Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that CTBI’s
internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31,
2007.
The effectiveness of CTBI’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 has been audited by
BKD, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited the
CTBI’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual
report.
Date:
March 5, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ Jean R. Hale | |
Jean R. Hale | |||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo | |
Kevin J. Stumbo | |||
Executive Vice President and Treasurer | |||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
None
51
The information required by these Items
other than the information set forth above under Part I, “Executive Officers of
the Registrant,” is omitted because CTBI is filing a definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this report which includes the required
information. The required information contained in CTBI’s proxy
statement is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item
other than the information provided below is omitted because CTBI is filing a
definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days
after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report which includes the
required information. The required information contained in CTBI’s
proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides
information as of December 31, 2007, with respect to compensation plans under
which common shares of CTBI are authorized for issuance to officers or employees
in exchange for consideration in the form of services provided to CTBI and/or
its subsidiaries. We currently maintain one active and one inactive
incentive stock option plans covering key employees. The 2006 Stock
Ownership Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors
and the Shareholders in 2006. The 2006 Plan had 1,500,000 shares
authorized, 1,392,405 of which were available at December 31, 2007 for future
grants. In addition, any shares reserved for issuance under the 1998
Stock Option Plan (“1998 Plan”) in excess of the number of shares as to which
options or other benefits are awarded thereunder, plus any shares as to which
options or other benefits granted under the 1998 Plan may lapse, expire,
terminate or be canceled, shall also be reserved and available for issuance or
reissuance under the 2006 Plan. The 1998 Plan was approved by the
Board of Directors and the Shareholders in 1998. The 1998 Plan had
1,046,831 shares authorized, 151,311 of which were available at December 31,
2007 and transferred into the 2006 Plan. The 1989 Stock Option Plan
(“1989 Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders in
1989. The 1989 Stock Option Plan (“1989 Plan”) has no remaining
options available for grant.
A
|
B
|
C
|
|
Plan
Category
|
Number
of Common Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price of Issuance Outstanding Options
|
Number
of Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding securities reflected in Column A)
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by shareholders
|
689,008
|
$
21.83
|
1,543,716
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by shareholders
|
0
|
--
|
0
|
Total
|
689,008
|
$
21.83
|
1,543,716
|
Additional information regarding CTBI’s
stock option plans can be found in notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial
statements.
The information required by this Item
is omitted because CTBI is filing a definitive proxy statement pursuant to
Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered
by this report which includes the required information. The required
information contained in CTBI’s proxy statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
The information required by this Item
is omitted because CTBI is filing a definitive proxy statement pursuant to
Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered
by this report which includes the required information. The required
information contained in CTBI’s proxy statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
52
(a) The
following documents are filed as a part of this report:
Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedules
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
of Exhibits
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation and all amendments thereto {incorporated by reference to
registration statement no. 33-35138}
|
3.2
|
By-laws
of CTBI as amended July 25, 1995 {incorporated by reference to
registration statement no. 33-61891}
|
3.3
|
By-laws
of CTBI as amended January 29, 2008 {incorporated by reference to current
report on Form 8-K filed January 30, 2008}
|
10.1
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Effective January 1,
2007) {incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006 under SEC file no. 000-111-29}
|
10.2
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Amendment
Number One effective January 1, 2002, Amendment Number Two effective
January 1, 2004, Amendment Number Three effective March 28, 2005, and
Amendment Number Four effective January 1, 2006) {incorporated herein by
reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 under
SEC file no. 000-111-29}
|
10.3
|
Second
restated Pikeville National Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan (commonly
known as Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1989 Stock Option Plan)
{incorporated by reference to registration statement no.
33-36165}
|
10.4
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan {incorporated by reference to
registration statement no. 333-74217}
|
10.5
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan {incorporated by
reference to Proxy Statement dated March 24, 2006}
|
10.6
|
Form
of Severance Agreement between Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and executive
officers (currently in effect with respect to eleven executive officers)
{incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001 under SEC file no. 000-111-29}
|
10.7
|
Senior
Management Incentive Compensation Plan (2008) {incorporated herein by
reference to current report on Form 8-K dated January 29,
2008}
|
10.8
|
Restricted
Stock Agreement {incorporated herein by reference to current report on
Form 8-K dated January 29, 2008}
|
21
|
List
of subsidiaries
|
23.1
|
Consent
of BKD, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
23.2
|
Consent
of Deloitte & Touche, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer (Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and
CEO)
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer (Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President
and Treasurer)
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and CEO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
(b)Exhibits
The
response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this
report.
(c)Financial
Statement Schedules
None
53
Pursuant to the requirements of Section
13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. | |||
Date:
March 5, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ Jean R. Hale | |
Jean R. Hale | |||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo | |
Kevin J. Stumbo | |||
Executive Vice President and Treasurer | |||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
54
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
Jean R. Hale
|
Chairman,
President, and Chief Executive Officer
|
Jean
R. Hale
|
||
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
Kevin J. Stumbo
|
Executive
Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial
Officer)
|
Kevin
J. Stumbo
|
||
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
Charles J. Baird
|
Director
|
Charles
J. Baird
|
||
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
Nick A. Cooley
|
Director
|
Nick
A. Cooley
|
||
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
James E. McGhee, II
|
Director
|
James
E. McGhee II
|
||
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
M. Lynn Parrish
|
Director
|
M.
Lynn Parrish
|
||
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
James R. Ramsey
|
Director
|
James
R. Ramsey
|
||
March
5, 2008
|
/s/
Paul E. Patton
|
Director
|
Paul
E. Patton
|
55
COMMUNITY
TRUST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit
No.
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation for CTBI {incorporated herein by
reference}
|
3.2
|
By-laws
of CTBI as amended July 25, 1995 {incorporated herein by
reference}
|
3.3
|
By-laws
of CTBI as amended January 29, 2008 {incorporated herein by
reference}
|
10.1
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Effective January 1,
2007) {incorporated herein by reference}
|
10.2
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Amendment
Number One effective January 1, 2002, Amendment Number Two effective
January 1, 2004, Amendment Number Three effective March 28, 2005, and
Amendment Number Four effective January 1, 2006) {incorporated herein by
reference}
|
10.3
|
Second
restated Pikeville National Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan (commonly
known as Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1989 Stock Option Plan)
{incorporated herein by reference}
|
10.4
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan {incorporated herein by
reference}
|
10.5
|
Community
Trust Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan {incorporated
herein by reference}
|
10.6
|
Form
of Severance Agreement between Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and executive
officers (currently in effect with respect to eleven executive officers)
{incorporated herein by reference}
|
10.7
|
Senior
Management Incentive Compensation Plan (2008) {incorporated herein by
reference}
|
10.8
|
Restricted
Stock Agreement {incorporated herein by reference}
|
21
|
List
of subsidiaries
|
23.1
|
Consent
of BKD, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
23.2
|
Consent
of Deloitte & Touche, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer (Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and
CEO)
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer (Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President
and Treasurer)
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and CEO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|