COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP INC /KY/ - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)

ctbi10k2009.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
	Or
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
	For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 0-11129

COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Kentucky	61-0979818
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	IRS Employer Identification No.
346 North Mayo Trail Pikeville, Kentucky (address of principal executive offices)	41501 (Zip Code)

(606) 432-1414

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $5.00 par value

(Title of Class)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes

No ü

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes

No ü

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ü

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer ü	Non-accelerated filer	Smaller reporting company
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

No ü

Based upon the closing price of the Common Shares of the Registrant on the NASDAQ-Stock Market LLC – Global Select Market, the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2009 was $375.3 million. For the purpose of the foregoing calculation only, all directors and executive officers of the Registrant have been deemed affiliates. The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of February 26, 2010 was 15,199,639.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

PART I

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Selected Statistical Information

Item 2. Properties

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

PART II

Item 4. Reserved

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

Item 6. Selected Financial Data 2005-2009

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Item 9B. Other Information

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance of the Registrant

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Signatures

Index to Exhibits

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference into the Form 10-K part indicated:

Document	Form 10-K
(1) Proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 27, 2010	Part III

PART I

Item 1. Business

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) is a bank holding company registered with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to Section 5(a) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. CTBI was incorporated August 12, 1980, under the laws of the Commonwealth of Kentucky for the purpose of becoming a bank holding company. At December 31, 2009, CTBI owned all the capital stock of one commercial bank and one trust company, serving small and mid-sized communities in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and southern West Virginia. The commercial bank is Community Trust Bank, Inc., Pikeville, Kentucky (the “Bank”) and the trust company is Community Trust and Investment Company, Lexington, Kentucky (the “Trust Company”). At December 31, 2009, CTBI had total consolidated assets of $3.1 billion and total consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $2.6 billion, making it the second largest bank holding company headquartered in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

Through its subsidiaries, CTBI engages in a wide range of commercial and personal banking and trust activities, which include accepting time and demand deposits; making secured and unsecured loans to corporations, individuals and others; providing cash management services to corporate and individual customers; issuing letters of credit; renting safe deposit boxes; and providing funds transfer services. The lending activities of our Bank include making commercial, construction, mortgage, and personal loans. Lease-financing, lines of credit, revolving lines of credit, term loans, and other specialized loans, including asset-based financing, are also available. Our corporate subsidiaries act as trustees of personal trusts, as executors of estates, as trustees for employee benefit trusts, as registrars, transfer agents, and paying agents for bond and stock issues, as depositories for securities, and as providers of full service brokerage services.

COMPETITION

CTBI’s subsidiaries face substantial competition for deposit, credit, trust, and brokerage relationships in the communities we serve. Competing providers include state banks, national banks, thrifts, trust companies, insurance companies, mortgage banking operations, credit unions, finance companies, brokerage companies, and other financial and non-financial companies which may offer products functionally equivalent to those offered by our subsidiaries. Many of these providers offer services within and outside the market areas served by our subsidiaries. We strive to offer competitively priced products along with quality customer service to build customer relationships in the communities we serve.

Recently, the United States and global markets, as well as general economic conditions, have been disruptive and volatile. Some financial institutions have failed and others have been forced to seek acquisition partners. Larger financial institutions, some of whom may benefit from partial nationalization, could strengthen their competitive position as a result of ongoing consolidation within the financial services industry.

Since July 1989, banking legislation in Kentucky places no limits on the number of banks or bank holding companies that a bank holding company may acquire. Interstate acquisitions are allowed where reciprocity exists between the laws of Kentucky and the home state of the bank or bank holding company to be acquired. Bank holding companies continue to be limited to control of less than 15% of deposits held by banks in the states where they do business (exclusive of inter-bank and foreign deposits).

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the “GLB Act”) has expanded the permissible activities of a bank holding company. The GLB Act allows qualifying bank holding companies to elect to be treated as financial holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature or are incidental or complementary to financial activities. We have not yet elected to be treated as a financial holding company. The GLB Act also eliminated restrictions imposed by the Glass-Steagall Financial Services Law, adopted in the 1930s, which prevented banking, insurance, and securities firms from fully entering each other’s business. This legislation has resulted in further consolidation in the financial services industry. In addition, removal of these restrictions has increased the number of entities providing banking services and thereby created additional competition.

No material portion of our business is seasonal. We are not dependent upon any one customer or a few customers, and the loss of any one or a few customers would not have a material adverse effect on us. See note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding concentrations of credit.

We do not engage in any operations in foreign countries.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2009, CTBI and subsidiaries had 982 full-time equivalent employees. Our employees are provided with a variety of employee benefits. A retirement plan, an employee stock ownership plan, group life insurance, major medical insurance, a cafeteria plan, and annual management and employee incentive compensation plans are available to eligible personnel.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

We, as a registered bank holding company, are restricted to those activities permissible under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and are subject to actions of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System thereunder. We are required to file an annual report with the Federal Reserve Board and are subject to an annual examination by the Board.

Our Bank is a state-chartered bank subject to state and federal banking laws and regulations and periodic examination by the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions and the restrictions, including dividend restrictions, thereunder. Our Bank is also a member of the Federal Reserve System and is subject to certain restrictions imposed by and to examination and supervision under the Federal Reserve Act. Our Trust Company is also regulated by the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Reserve.

Deposits of our Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which subjects banks to regulation and examination under the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

The operations of CTBI and our subsidiaries are also affected by other banking legislation and policies and practices of various regulatory authorities. Such legislation and policies include statutory maximum rates on some loans, reserve requirements, domestic monetary and fiscal policy, and limitations on the kinds of services that may be offered.

CTBI’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge on our website at www.ctbi.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. CTBI’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available on our website. Copies of our annual report will be made available free of charge upon written request.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

Certain of the statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. CTBI’s actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions, portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions including the performance of financial markets, prevailing inflation and interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; results of various investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, changes in laws and regulations, competition, and demographic changes on target market populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties; the adoption by CTBI of a Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) policy that provides guidance on the reporting of delinquent consumer loans and the timing of associated credit charge-offs for financial institution subsidiaries; and the resolution of legal proceedings and related matters. In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, which include those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and state regulators, whose policies and regulations could affect CTBI’s results. These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and CTBI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Economic Risk

CTBI may continue to be adversely affected by current economic and market conditions.

The national and global economic downturn has resulted in unprecedented levels of financial market volatility and has in general adversely impacted the market value of financial institutions, limited access to capital and had an adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of banking companies in general, including CTBI. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. During this time, CTBI has experienced challenges, credit quality has deteriorated and net income and results of operations have been adversely impacted. Although CTBI operated at a profit last year, CTBI is a part of the financial system and a continuation of the systemic lack of available credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets, and reduced business activity could materially and adversely impact CTBI’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, the possible duration and severity of the adverse economic cycle is unknown and may exacerbate financial service providers’, including CTBI’s, exposure to credit risk. Actions by Congress, Treasury, the FDIC and other governmental agencies and regulators have been initiated to address economic stabilization, yet the efficacy of these programs in stabilizing the economy and the banking system is uncertain. There can be no assurance that these actions will not have an adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of financial service providers including CTBI.

Economy of Our Markets

Our business may continue to be adversely affected by downturns in the local economies on which we depend.

Our loan portfolio is concentrated primarily in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and southern West Virginia. Our profits depend on providing products and services to clients in these local regions. These regions have recently experienced an increase in unemployment and a decrease in real estate values. Further increases in unemployment, additional decreases in real estate values, or increases in interest rates could weaken the local economies in which we operate. Weakness in our market area could depress our earnings and consequently our financial condition because:

·	Clients may not want, need, or qualify for our products and services;

·	Borrowers may not be able to repay their loans;

·	The value of the collateral securing our loans to borrowers may decline; and

·	The quality of our loan portfolio may decline.

Interest Rate Risk

Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition.

Our earnings and financial condition are dependent to a large degree upon net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned from loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The narrowing of interest-rate spreads, meaning the difference between the interest rates earned on loans and investments and the interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings, could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including:

·	The rate of inflation;

·	The rate of economic growth;

·	Employment levels;

·	Monetary policies; and

·	Instability in domestic and foreign financial markets.

Changes in market interest rates will also affect the level of voluntary prepayments on our loans and the receipt of payments on our mortgage-backed securities resulting in the receipt of proceeds that may be reinvested at a lower rate than the loan or mortgage-backed security being prepaid.

We originate residential loans for sale and for our portfolio. The origination of loans for sale is designed to meet client financing needs and earn fee income. The origination of loans for sale is highly dependent upon the local real estate market and the level and trend of interest rates. Increasing interest rates may reduce the origination of loans for sale and consequently the fee income we earn. While our commercial banking, construction, and income property business lines remain a significant portion of our activities, high interest rates may reduce our mortgage-banking activities and thereby our income. In contrast, decreasing interest rates have the effect of causing clients to refinance mortgage loans faster than anticipated. This causes the value of assets related to the servicing rights on loans sold to be lower than originally anticipated. If this happens, we may need to write down our servicing assets faster, which would accelerate our expense and lower our earnings.

We consider interest rate risk one of our most significant market risks. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. Consistency of our net interest revenue is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk. We employ a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage our interest rate risk including the use of an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to changing interest rates. The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and liabilities. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain, and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.

Banking Reform

Our business may be adversely affected by proposed “banking reform” legislation.

The Obama administration has proposed major changes to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regimes in the near future in light of the recent performance of and government intervention in the financial services sector. Legislation to implement these changes is pending in the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. These proposed reforms and other changes to statutes, regulations, and policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations, or policies, could affect CTBI in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject CTBI to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products CTBI may offer, negatively impact the recoverability of certain of our recorded assets, and increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things.

Government Policies

Our business may be adversely affected by changes in government policies.

The earnings of banks and bank holding companies such as ours are affected by the policies of regulatory authorities, including the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the money supply. Among the methods employed by the Federal Reserve Board are open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These methods are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and their use may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial and savings banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.

The banking industry is highly regulated and changes in federal and state banking regulations as well as policies and administration guidelines may affect our practices, growth prospects, and earnings. In particular, there is no assurance that recent governmental actions designed to stabilize the economy and banking system will not adversely affect the financial position or results of operations of CTBI.

Credit Risk

Our earnings and reputation may be adversely affected if we fail to effectively manage our credit risk.

Originating and underwriting loans are integral to the success of our business. This business requires us to take “credit risk,” which is the risk of losing principal and interest income because borrowers fail to repay loans. Collateral values and the ability of borrowers to repay their loans may be affected at any time by factors such as:

·	The length and severity of downturns in the local economies in which we operate or the national economy;

·	The length and severity of downturns in one or more of the business sectors in which our customers operate, particularly the automobile, hotel/motel, coal, and residential development industries; or

·	A rapid increase in interest rates.

Our loan portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss.

We originate commercial real estate loans, construction and development loans, consumer loans, and residential mortgage loans, primarily within our market area. Commercial real estate, commercial, and construction and development loans tend to involve larger loan balances to a single borrower or groups of related borrowers and are most susceptible to a risk of loss during a downturn in the business cycle. These loans also have historically had a greater credit risk than other loans for the following reasons:

Commercial Real Estate Loans. Repayment is dependent on income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service. These loans also involve greater risks because they are generally not fully amortizing over a loan period, but rather have a balloon payment due at maturity. A borrower’s ability to make a balloon payment typically will depend on being able to either refinance the loan or timely sell the underlying property. As of December 31, 2009, commercial real estate loans, including multi-family loans, comprised approximately 29% of our total loan portfolio.

Other Commercial Loans. Repayment is generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business. In addition, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, be difficult to appraise, be illiquid, or fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. As of December 31, 2009, commercial loans comprised approximately 16% of our total loan portfolio.

Construction and Development Loans. The risk of loss is largely dependent on our initial estimate of whether the property’s value at completion equals or exceeds the cost of property construction and the availability of take-out financing. During the construction phase, a number of factors can result in delays or cost overruns. If our estimate is inaccurate or if actual construction costs exceed estimates, the value of the property securing our loan may be insufficient to ensure full repayment when completed through a permanent loan, sale of the property, or by seizure of collateral. As of December 31, 2009, construction and development loans comprised approximately 8% of our total loan portfolio.

Consumer loans may carry a higher degree of repayment risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly when the consumer loan is unsecured. Repayment of a consumer loan typically depends on the borrower’s financial stability, and it is more likely to be affected adversely by job loss, illness, or personal bankruptcy. In addition, federal and state bankruptcy, insolvency, and other laws may limit the amount we can recover when a consumer client defaults. As of December 31, 2009, consumer loans comprised approximately 22% of our total loan portfolio.

A large percentage of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, in particular commercial real estate. Continued deterioration in the real estate market or other segments of our loan portfolio would lead to additional losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2009, approximately 62% of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, the majority of which is commercial real estate. As a result of increased levels of commercial and consumer delinquencies and declining real estate values, we have experienced increasing levels of net charge-offs and allowances for loan and lease reserves. Continued increases in commercial and consumer delinquency levels or continued declines in real estate market values would require increased net charge-offs and increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.

Increased FDIC Assessments

Our FDIC insurance assessments have increased substantially and may continue to increase, resulting in higher operating costs.

In the past several years, the FDIC announced significant increases in the premiums charged for FDIC deposit insurance protection. In 2009, a special assessment of $1.3 million was paid by CTBI. Should more bank failures occur, FDIC premiums could continue to increase. These increased premiums will have an adverse effect on our net income and results of operations.

Environmental Liability Risk

We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activity.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, we may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit our ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability. Although we have policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Competition

Strong competition within our market area may reduce our ability to attract and retain deposits and originate loans.

We face competition both in originating loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in the financial services industry is intense. We compete for clients by offering excellent service and competitive rates on our loans and deposit products. The type of institutions we compete with include commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and brokerage and investment banking firms. Competition arises from institutions located within and outside our market areas. As a result of their size and ability to achieve economies of scale, certain of our competitors offer a broader range of products and services than we offer. The recent economic crisis is likely to result in increased consolidation in the financial industry and larger financial institutions, some of whom may benefit from partial nationalization, may strengthen their competitive positions. In addition, to stay competitive in our markets we may need to adjust the interest rates on our products to match the rates offered by our competitors, which could adversely affect our net interest margin. As a result, our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our market areas while achieving our investment objectives.

Acquisition Risk

We may have difficulty in the future continuing to grow through acquisitions.

Due to consolidation within the banking industry, the number of suitable acquisition targets has decreased and there is intense competition for attractive acquisitions. As a result, we may experience difficulty in making acquisitions on acceptable terms.

Any future acquisitions or mergers by CTBI or its banking subsidiary are subject to approval by the appropriate federal and state banking regulators. The banking regulators evaluate a number of criteria in making their approval decisions, such as:

·	Safety and soundness guidelines;

Compliance with all laws including the USA Patriot Act, the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules and regulations promulgated under such Act or the Exchange Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, and all other applicable fair lending laws and other laws relating to discriminatory business practices; and

·	Anti-competitive concerns with the proposed transaction.

If the banking regulators or a commenter on our regulatory application raise concerns about any of these criteria at the time a regulatory application is filed, the banking regulators may deny, delay, or condition their approval of a proposed transaction.

We have grown, and intend to continue to grow, through acquisitions of banks and other financial institutions. After these acquisitions, we may experience adverse changes in results of operations of acquired entities, unforeseen liabilities, asset quality problems of acquired entities, loss of key personnel, loss of clients because of change of identity, difficulties in integrating data processing and operational procedures, and deterioration in local economic conditions. These various acquisition risks can be heightened in larger transactions.

Integration Risk

We may not be able to achieve the expected integration and cost savings from our ongoing bank acquisition activities.

We have a long history of acquiring financial institutions and we expect this acquisition activity to continue in the future. Difficulties may arise in the integration of the business and operations of the financial institutions that agree to merge with and into CTBI and, as a result, we may not be able to achieve the cost savings and synergies that we expect will result from the merger activities. Achieving cost savings is dependent on consolidating certain operational and functional areas, eliminating duplicative positions and terminating certain agreements for outside services. Additional operational savings are dependent upon the integration of the banking businesses of the acquired financial institution with that of CTBI, including the conversion of the acquired entity’s core operating systems, data systems and products to those of CTBI and the standardization of business practices. Complications or difficulties in the conversion of the core operating systems, data systems, and products of these other banks to those of CTBI may result in the loss of clients, damage to our reputation within the financial services industry, operational problems, one-time costs currently not anticipated by us, and/or reduced cost savings resulting from the merger activities.

Operational Risk

An extended disruption of vital infrastructure or a security breach could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Our operations depend upon, among other things, our infrastructure, including equipment and facilities. Extended disruption of vital infrastructure by fire, power loss, natural disaster, telecommunications failure, computer hacking or viruses, terrorist activity or the domestic and foreign response to such activity, or other events outside of our control could have a material adverse impact on the financial services industry as a whole and on our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition in particular. Our business recovery plan may not work as intended or may not prevent significant interruption of our operations. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in the loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.

Market Risk

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.'s stock price is volatile.

Our stock price has been volatile in the past, and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include:

·	Actual or anticipated variations in earnings;

·	Changes in analysts' recommendations or projections;

·	CTBI's announcements of developments related to our businesses;

·	Operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers;

·	New technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional competitors; and

·	News reports of trends, concerns, and other issues related to the financial services industry.

Our stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to CTBI's performance. The recent financial crisis has resulted in a lack of investor confidence in the financial institutions sector. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price of our common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Technology Risk

CTBI continually encounters technological change.

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations.

Counterparty Risk

The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect CTBI.

Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services companies are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds, and other institutional counterparties. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services companies, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due us. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect our businesses, financial condition, or results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION

The following tables set forth certain statistical information relating to CTBI and subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and should be read together with our consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Average Balance Sheets and Taxable Equivalent Income/Expense and Yields/Rates

	2009								2008								2007
(in thousands)	Average Balances			Interest		Average Rate			Average Balances			Interest		Average Rate			Average Balances			Interest		Average Rate
Earning assets:
Loans (1)(2)(3)	$	2,383,875		$	139,677		5.86	%	$	2,283,180		$	150,413		6.59	%	$	2,205,431		$	171,632		7.78	%
Loans held for sale		1,580			359		22.72			1,752			171		9.76			2,484			157		6.32
Securities:
U.S. Treasury and agencies		237,641			8,792		3.70			249,515			10,912		4.37			275,219			12,034		4.37
Tax exempt state and political subdivisions (3)		47,801			2,839		5.94			45,146			2,875		6.37			45,514			2,946		6.47
Other securities		20,812			777		3.73			32,842			1,723		5.25			117,136			5,350		4.57
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		29,047			1,402		4.83			28,549			1,559		5.46			28,040			1,794		6.40
Federal funds sold		66,619			193		0.29			53,816			1,083		2.01			82,324			4,246		5.16
Interest bearing deposits		24,203			54		0.22			6,297			121		1.92			1,910			83		4.35
Other investments		17,267			131		0.76			100			3		3.00			100			5		5.00
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries		1,856			120		6.47			1,857			120		6.46			1,856			130		7.00
Total earning assets		2,830,701		$	154,344		5.45	%		2,703,054		$	168,980		6.25	%		2,760,014		$	198,377		7.19	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(32,599	)							(29,901	)							(28,129	)
		2,798,102								2,673,153								2,731,885
Nonearning assets:
Cash and due from banks		59,940								74,264								75,667
Premises and equipment, net		50,843								52,559								54,434
Other assets		138,215								121,241								118,727
Total assets	$	3,047,100							$	2,921,217							$	2,980,713

Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Savings and demand deposits	$	666,874		$	4,002		0.60	%	$	655,577		$	7,885		1.20	%	$	696,329		$	17,457		2.51	%
Time deposits		1,271,072			35,791		2.82			1,204,550			45,964		3.82			1,231,039			58,180		4.73
Repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased		180,044			2,457		1.36			170,231			4,424		2.60			174,697			8,429		4.82
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		47,434			1,291		2.72			49,001			1,701		3.47			67,452			2,402		3.56
Long-term debt		61,341			3,999		6.52			61,341			4,000		6.52			61,830			4,364		7.06
Total interest bearing liabilities		2,226,765		$	47,540		2.13	%		2,140,700		$	63,974		2.99	%		2,231,347		$	90,832		4.07	%
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		471,902								443,593								425,534
Other liabilities		30,722								28,523								29,726
Total liabilities		2,729,389								2,612,816								2,686,607

Shareholders’ equity		317,711								308,401								294,106
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,047,100							$	2,921,217							$	2,980,713

Net interest income				$	106,804							$	105,006							$	107,545
Net interest spread							3.32	%							3.26	%							3.12	%
Benefit of interest free funding							0.45	%							0.62	%							0.78	%
Net interest margin							3.77	%							3.88	%							3.90	%

(1) Interest includes fees on loans of $1,741, $1,679, and $1,819 in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

(2) Loan balances are net of unearned income and include principal balances on nonaccrual loans.

(3) Tax exempt income on securities and loans is reported on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a 35% rate.

Net Interest Differential

The following table illustrates the approximate effect of volume and rate changes on net interest differentials between 2009 and 2008 and also between 2008 and 2007.

	Total Change			Change Due to						Total Change			Change Due to
(in thousands)		2009/2008		Volume			Rate				2008/2007		Volume			Rate
Interest income
Loans	$	(10,736	)	$	6,424		$	(17,160	)	$	(21,219	)	$	5,877		$	(27,096	)
Loans held for sale		188			(15	)		203			14			(37	)		51
U.S. Treasury and agencies		(2,120	)		(538	)		(1,582	)		(1,122	)		(1,124	)		2
Tax exempt state and political subdivisions		(36	)		164			(200	)		(71	)		(24	)		(47	)
Other securities		(946	)		(733	)		(213	)		(3,627	)		(3,375	)		(252	)
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(157	)		27			(184	)		(235	)		32			(267	)
Federal funds sold		(890	)		210			(1,100	)		(3,163	)		(1,794	)		(1,369	)
Interest bearing deposits		(67	)		112			(179	)		38			41			(3	)
Other investments		128			132			(4	)		(2	)		0			(2	)
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries		0			0			0			(10	)		0			(10	)
Total interest income		(14,636	)		5,783			(20,419	)		(29,397	)		(404	)		(28,993	)

Interest expense
Savings and demand deposits		(3,883	)		134			(4,017	)		(9,572	)		(1,075	)		(8,497	)
Time deposits		(10,173	)		2,423			(12,596	)		(12,216	)		(1,277	)		(10,939	)
Repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased		(1,967	)		242			(2,209	)		(4,005	)		(221	)		(3,784	)
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(410	)		(56	)		(354	)		(701	)		(672	)		(29	)
Long-term debt		(1	)		0			(1	)		(364	)		(34	)		(330	)
Total interest expense		(16,434	)		2,743			(19,177	)		(26,858	)		(3,279	)		(23,579	)

Net interest income	$	1,798		$	3,040		$	(1,242	)	$	(2,539	)	$	2,875		$	(5,414	)

For purposes of the above table, changes which are due to both rate and volume are allocated based on a percentage basis, using the absolute values of rate and volume variance as a basis for percentages. Income is stated at a fully taxable equivalent basis, assuming a 35% tax rate.

Investment Portfolio

The maturity distribution and weighted average interest rates of securities at December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Available-for-sale

	Estimated Maturity at December 31, 2009
	Within 1 Year					1-5 Years					5-10 Years					After 10 Years					Total Fair Value					Amortized Cost
(in thousands)	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount
U.S. Treasury, government agencies, and government sponsored agencies	$	28,516		3.85	%	$	160,538		4.36	%	$	14,759		3.46	%	$	315		6.44	%	$	204,128		4.22	%	$	198,687
State and municipal obligations		10,068		5.50			13,840		5.97			6,624		5.11			15,125		6.09			45,657		5.85			44,529
Other securities		0		0.00			0		0.00			20,097		3.72			355		1.35			20,452		3.66			20,540
Total	$	38,584		4.36	%	$	174,378		4.46	%	$	41,480		3.85	%	$	15,795		5.99	%	$	270,237		4.44	%	$	263,756

Held-to-maturity

	Estimated Maturity at December 31, 2009
	Within 1 Year					1-5 Years					5-10 Years					After 10 Years					Total Amortized Cost					Fair Value
(in thousands)	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount
U.S. Treasury, government agencies, and government sponsored agencies	$	12,280		3.88	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	12,280		3.88	%	$	12,373
State and municipal obligations		195		6.58			200		6.56			0		0.00			1,181		5.97			1,576		6.13			1,582
Other securities		0		0.00			480		1.13			0		0.00			0		0.00			480		1.13			480
Total	$	12,475		3.92	%	$	680		6.65	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	1,181		5.97	%	$	14,336		4.14	%	$	14,435


Total securities	$	51,059		4.25	%	$	175,058		4.46	%	$	41,480		3.85	%	$	16,976		5.99	%	$	284,573		4.42	%	$	278,191

The calculations of the weighted average interest rates for each maturity category are based upon yield weighted by the respective costs of the securities. The weighted average rates on state and political subdivisions are computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a 35% tax rate.

Excluding those holdings of the investment portfolio in U.S. Treasury securities, government agencies, and government sponsored agencies, there were no securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of our shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2009.

The book values of securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

The book value of securities at December 31, 2007 is presented below:

(in thousands)	Available-for- Sale		Held-to- Maturity
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	20,307	$	0
State and political subdivisions		40,472		1,901
U.S. government sponsored agencies		205,049		31,058
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1		0
Total debt securities		265,829		32,959
Marketable equity securities		60,050		0
Total securities	$	325,879	$	32,959

Loan Portfolio

(in thousands)	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
Commercial:
Construction	$	141,440		$	156,425		$	143,773		$	133,902		$	115,721
Secured by real estate		707,500			663,663			640,574			632,881			665,911
Other		373,829			365,685			333,774			337,075			301,828
Total commercial		1,222,769			1,185,773			1,118,121			1,103,858			1,083,460

Real estate construction		51,311			56,298			69,021			50,588			51,232
Real estate mortgage		610,727			609,394			599,665			579,197			542,809
Consumer		530,905			484,843			435,273			422,291			414,920
Equipment lease financing		20,048			12,343			5,817			11,524			14,923
Total loans	$	2,435,760		$	2,348,651		$	2,227,897		$	2,167,458		$	2,107,344

Percent of total year-end loans
Commercial:
Construction		5.80	%		6.65	%		6.45	%		6.18	%		5.49	%
Secured by real estate		29.05			28.26			28.75			29.20			31.60
Other		15.35			15.57			14.98			15.55			14.32
Total commercial		50.20			50.48			50.18			50.93			51.41

Real estate construction		2.11			2.40			3.10			2.34			2.43
Real estate mortgage		25.07			25.95			26.92			26.72			25.76
Consumer		21.80			20.64			19.54			19.48			19.69
Equipment lease financing		0.82			0.53			0.26			0.53			0.71
Total loans		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%

The total loans above are net of unearned income.

The following table shows the amounts of loans (excluding residential mortgages of 1-4 family residences, consumer loans, and lease financing) which, based on the remaining scheduled repayments of principal are due in the periods indicated. Also, the amounts are classified according to sensitivity to changes in interest rates (fixed, variable).

	Maturity at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)	Within One Year		After One but Within Five Years		After Five Years		Total
Commercial secured by real estate and commercial other	$	230,414	$	266,025	$	584,890	$	1,081,329
Commercial and real estate construction		121,464		20,689		50,598		192,751
	$	351,878	$	286,714	$	635,488	$	1,274,080

Rate sensitivity:
Predetermined rate	$	71,365	$	55,486	$	52,462	$	179,313
Adjustable rate		280,513		231,228		583,026		1,094,767
	$	351,878	$	286,714	$	635,488	$	1,274,080

Nonperforming Assets

(in thousands)	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
Nonaccrual loans	$	32,247		$	40,945		$	22,237		$	9,863		$	12,219
Troubled debt restructured loans		0			0			20			66			899
90 days or more past due and still accruing interest		9,067			11,245			9,622			4,294			8,284
Total nonperforming loans		41,314			52,190			31,879			14,223			21,402

Other repossessed assets		276			239			241			3			60
Foreclosed properties		37,333			10,425			7,851			4,524			5,410
Total nonperforming assets	$	78,923		$	62,854		$	39,971		$	18,750		$	26,872

Nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed properties/assets		3.19	%		2.66	%		1.79	%		0.86	%		1.27	%
Allowance to nonperforming loans		79.01	%		59.06	%		88.00	%		193.54	%		137.87	%

Nonaccrual, Past Due, and Restructured Loans

(in thousands)	Nonaccrual loans		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Restructured Loans		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		As a % of Loan Balances by Category			Balances
December 31, 2009
Commercial construction	$	12,312		8.70	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	865		0.61	%	$	141,440
Commercial secured by real estate		9,803		1.39			0		0.00			5,640		0.80			707,500
Commercial other		4,489		1.20			0		0.00			286		0.08			373,829
Consumer real estate construction		1,244		2.42			0		0.00			0		0.00			51,311
Consumer real estate secured		4,399		0.72			0		0.00			1,698		0.28			610,727
Consumer other		0		0.00			0		0.00			578		0.11			530,905
Equipment lease financing		0		0.00			0		0.00			0		0.00			20,048
Total	$	32,247		1.32	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	9,067		0.37	%	$	2,435,760

December 31, 2008
Commercial construction	$	21,602		13.81	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	3,741		2.39	%	$	156,425
Commercial secured by real estate		10,780		1.62			0		0.00			3,319		0.50			663,663
Commercial other		4,471		1.22			0		0.00			634		0.17			365,685
Consumer real estate construction		1,255		2.23			0		0.00			55		0.10			56,298
Consumer real estate secured		2,837		0.47			0		0.00			3,008		0.49			609,394
Consumer other		0		0.00			0		0.00			488		0.10			484,843
Equipment lease financing		0		0.00			0		0.00			0		0.00			12,343
Total	$	40,945		1.74	%	$	0		0.00	%	$	11,245		0.48	%	$	2,348,651

In 2009, gross interest income that would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans had the loans been current in accordance with their original terms amounted to $2.3 million. Interest income actually received and included in net income for the period was $0.3 million, leaving $2.0 million of interest income not recognized during the period.

Discussion of the Nonaccrual Policy

The accrual of interest income on loans is discontinued when the collection of interest and principal in full is not expected. When interest accruals are discontinued, interest income accrued in the current period is reversed and interest income accrued in prior periods is charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Any loans past due 90 days or more must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest.

Potential Problem Loans

Interest accrual is discontinued when we believe, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.

Foreign Outstandings

None

Loan Concentrations

We had no concentration of loans exceeding 10% of total loans at December 31, 2009. See note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

(in thousands)	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of year	$	30,821	$	28,054	$	27,526	$	29,506	$	27,017
Loans charged off:
Commercial construction		3,435		1,491		273		23		56
Commercial secured by real estate		3,192		914		1,106		872		826
Commercial other		4,342		2,080		2,134		3,816		4,233
Real estate construction		330		125		32		56		10
Real estate mortgage		1,081		746		547		572		746
Consumer		6,479		5,942		4,340		4,091		5,097
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		0
Total charge-offs		18,859		11,298		8,432		9,430		10,968

Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Commercial construction		204		25		0		0		0
Commercial secured by real estate		415		177		180		132		94
Commercial other		350		534		428		689		766
Real estate construction		7		5		1		0		20
Real estate mortgage		150		60		250		210		310
Consumer		2,087		1,812		1,561		2,114		2,223
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		0
Total recoveries		3,213		2,613		2,420		3,145		3,413

Net charge-offs/(recoveries):
Commercial construction		3,231		1,466		273		23		56
Commercial secured by real estate		2,777		737		926		740		732
Commercial other		3,992		1,546		1,706		3,127		3,467
Real estate construction		323		120		31		56		(10	)
Real estate mortgage		931		686		297		362		436
Consumer		4,392		4,130		2,779		1,977		2,874
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		0
Total net charge-offs/(recoveries)		15,646		8,685		6,012		6,285		7,555

Provisions charged against operations		17,468		11,452		6,540		4,305		8,285

Allowance of acquired bank		0		0		0		0		1,759
Balance, end of year	$	32,643	$	30,821	$	28,054	$	27,526	$	29,506

Allocation of allowance, end of year:
Commercial construction	$	2,774	$	3,645	$	3,194	$	2,059	$	1,799
Commercial secured by real estate		12,595		11,304		9,081		7,224		10,354
Commercial other		6,340		5,782		4,817		4,335		4,693
Real estate construction		294		281		335		206		159
Real estate mortgage		3,493		3,038		2,907		2,352		1,677
Consumer		6,824		6,580		5,034		4,288		4,602
Equipment lease financing		323		191		76		126		232
Unallocated		0		0		2,610		6,936		5,990
Balance, end of year	$	32,643	$	30,821	$	28,054	$	27,526	$	29,506

Average loans outstanding, net of unearned interest	$	2,383,875	$	2,283,180	$	2,205,431	$	2,131,649	$	2,024,756
Loans outstanding at end of year, net of unearned interest	$	2,435,760	$	2,348,651	$	2,227,897	$	2,167,458	$	2,107,344

Net charge-offs/(recoveries) to average loan type:
Commercial construction	2.22	%	0.98	%	0.19	%	0.02	%	0.06	%
Commercial secured by real estate	0.40		0.11		0.14		0.11		0.11
Commercial other	1.07		0.43		0.51		0.99		1.18
Real estate construction	0.64		0.19		0.05		0.11		(0.03	)
Real estate mortgage	0.16		0.10		0.05		0.06		0.08
Consumer	0.86		0.91		0.64		0.48		0.71
Equipment lease financing	0.00		0.00		0.00		0.00		0.00
Total	0.66	%	0.38	%	0.27	%	0.29	%	0.37	%

Other ratios:
Allowance to net loans, end of year	1.34	%	1.31	%	1.26	%	1.27	%	1.40	%
Provision for loan losses to average loans	0.73		0.50		0.30		0.20		0.41

The allowance for loan and lease losses balance is maintained at a level considered adequate to cover anticipated probable losses based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations including their financial position and collateral values, and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time. This analysis is completed quarterly and forms the basis for allocation of the loan loss reserve and what charges to the provision may be required. See note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

Average Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds

(in thousands)	2009		2008		2007
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing deposits	$	471,902	$	443,593	$	425,534
NOW accounts		19,478		19,601		18,590
Money market accounts		430,818		436,895		483,782
Savings accounts		216,578		199,081		193,957
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more		480,653		443,020		456,483
Certificates of deposit < $100,000 and other time deposits		790,419		761,530		774,556
Total deposits		2,409,848		2,303,720		2,352,902

Other borrowed funds:
Repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased		180,044		170,231		174,697
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		47,434		49,001		67,452
Long-term debt		61,341		61,341		61,830
Total other borrowed funds		288,819		280,573		303,979
Total deposits and other borrowed funds	$	2,698,667	$	2,584,293	$	2,656,881

The maximum balance for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements at any month-end during 2009 occurred at November 30, 2009, with a month-end balance of $192.8 million. The maximum balance for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements at any month-end during 2008 occurred at May 31, 2008, with a month-end balance of $182.7 million. The maximum balance for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements at any month-end during 2007 occurred at August 31, 2007, with a month-end balance of $203.6 million.

Maturities and/or repricing of time deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:

(in thousands)	Certificates of Deposit		Other Time Deposits		Total
Three months or less	$	158,506	$	12,569	$	171,075
Over three through six months		79,220		6,176		85,396
Over six through twelve months		254,488		12,957		267,445
Over twelve through sixty months		24,231		7,468		31,699
Over sixty months		0		195		195
	$	516,445	$	39,365	$	555,810

Item 2. Properties

Our main office, which is owned by the Bank, is located at 346 North Mayo Trail, Pikeville, Kentucky 41501. Following is a schedule of properties owned and leased by CTBI and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009:

Location			Owned	Leased	Total
Banking locations:
Community Trust Bank, Inc.
*	Pikeville Market (lease land to 3 owned locations)		9	1	10
		10 locations in Pike County, Kentucky
	Floyd/Knott/Johnson Market (lease land to 1 owned location)		3	1	4
		2 locations in Floyd County, Kentucky, 1 location in Knott County, Kentucky, and 1 location in Johnson County, Kentucky
	Tug Valley Market (lease land to 1 owned location)		2	0	2
		1 location in Pike County, Kentucky, 1 location in Mingo County, West Virginia
	Whitesburg Market		4	1	5
		5 locations in Letcher County, Kentucky
	Hazard Market (lease land to 2 owned locations)		4	0	4
		4 locations in Perry County, Kentucky
*	Lexington Market (lease land to 2 owned locations)		3	2	5
		5 locations in Fayette County, Kentucky
	Winchester Market		1	1	2
		2 locations in Clark County, Kentucky
	Richmond Market (lease land to 1 owned location)		3	0	3
		3 locations in Madison County, Kentucky
	Mt. Sterling Market		2	0	2
		2 locations in Montgomery County, Kentucky
*	Versailles Market (lease land to 2 owned locations)		3	2	5
		2 locations in Woodford County, Kentucky, 2 locations in Franklin County, Kentucky, and 1 location in Scott County, Kentucky
	Danville Market (lease land to 1 owned location)		3	0	3
		2 locations in Boyle County, Kentucky and 1 location in Mercer County, Kentucky
*	Ashland Market (lease land to 1 owned location)		5	0	5
		4 locations in Boyd County, Kentucky and 1 location in Greenup County, Kentucky
	Flemingsburg Market		3	0	3
		3 locations in Fleming County, Kentucky
	Advantage Valley Market		3	1	4
		2 locations in Lincoln County, West Virginia, 1 location in Wayne County, West Virginia, and 1 location in Cabell County, West Virginia
	Summersville Market		1	0	1
		1 location in Nicholas County, West Virginia

*	Middlesboro Market (lease land to 1 owned location)		3	0	3
		3 locations in Bell County, Kentucky
	Williamsburg Market		5	0	5
		2 locations in Whitley County, Kentucky and 3 locations in Laurel County, Kentucky
	Campbellsville Market (lease land to 2 owned locations)		8	0	8
		2 locations in Taylor County, Kentucky, 2 locations in Pulaski County, Kentucky, 1 location in Adair County, Kentucky, 1 location in Green County, Kentucky, 1 location in Russell County, Kentucky, and 1 location in Marion County, Kentucky
	Mt. Vernon Market		2	0	2
		2 locations in Rockcastle County, Kentucky
Total banking locations			67	9	76
Operational locations:
Community Trust Bank, Inc.
	Pikeville (Pike County, Kentucky) (lease land to 1 owned location)		1	0	1
	Lexington (Fayette County, Kentucky)		0	1	1
Total operational locations			1	1	2

Other:
Community Trust Bank, Inc.
	Flemingsburg (Fleming County, Kentucky)		1	0	1
	Ashland (Boyd County, Kentucky)		0	1	1
Total other locations			1	1	2

Total locations			69	11	80

*Community Trust and Investment Company has leased offices in the main office locations in these markets.

See notes 8 and 15 to the consolidated financial statements included herein for the year ended December 31, 2009, for additional information relating to lease commitments and amounts invested in premises and equipment.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

CTBI and subsidiaries, and from time to time, our officers, are named defendants in legal actions arising from ordinary business activities. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, believes any pending actions are without merit or that the ultimate liability, if any, will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

PART II

Item 4. Reserved

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ-Stock Market LLC – Global Select Market under the symbol CTBI. As of February 26, 2010, there were approximately 4,150 holders of record of our outstanding common shares. Additional information required by this item is included in the Quarterly Financial Data below:

Quarterly Financial Data

(Unaudited)

(in thousands except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended	December 31			September 30			June 30			March 31
2009
Net interest income	$	28,582		$	27,045		$	25,409		$	24,474
Net interest income, taxable equivalent basis		28,912			27,386			25,741			24,765
Provision for loan losses		5,193			5,772			4,522			1,981
Noninterest income		10,486			9,226			10,955			10,753
Noninterest expense		23,847			22,579			23,578			23,797
Net income		6,958			5,584			5,937			6,580

Per common share:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.46		$	0.37		$	0.39		$	0.44
Diluted earnings per share		0.46			0.37			0.39			0.43
Dividends declared		0.30			0.30			0.30			0.30

Common stock price:
High	$	27.08		$	28.49		$	31.29		$	37.17
Low		22.41			25.15			25.62			22.55
Last trade		24.45			26.17			26.75			26.75

Selected ratios:
Return on average assets, annualized		0.90	%		0.72	%		0.78	%		0.89	%
Return on average common equity, annualized		8.58			6.94			7.52			8.51
Net interest margin, annualized		4.06			3.81			3.63			3.61

(in thousands except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended	December 31			September 30			June 30			March 31
2008
Net interest income	$	25,148		$	26,499		$	25,682		$	26,308
Net interest income, taxable equivalent basis		25,463			26,841			26,027			26,675
Provision for loan losses		3,560			2,875			2,648			2,369
Noninterest income		7,312			(3,969	)		9,681			8,743
Noninterest expense		20,788			21,300			20,443			20,001
Net income/(loss)		6,485			(577	)		8,620			8,545

Per common share:
Basic earnings/(loss) per share	$	0.43		$	(0.04	)	$	0.58		$	0.57
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share		0.43			(0.04	)		0.57			0.57
Dividends declared		0.30			0.29			0.29			0.29

Common stock price:
High	$	37.22		$	46.32		$	31.96		$	30.87
Low		23.05			15.99			26.25			23.38
Last trade		36.75			34.40			26.26			29.30

Selected ratios:
Return on average assets, annualized		0.87	%		(0.08	)%		1.19	%		1.18	%
Return on average common equity, annualized		8.44			(0.74	)		11.22			11.20
Net interest margin, annualized		3.69			3.97			3.88			4.00

Dividends

The annual dividend paid to our stockholders was increased from $1.17 per share to $1.20 per share during 2009. We have adopted a conservative policy of cash dividends by maintaining an average annual cash dividend ratio of less than 45%, with periodic stock dividends. The current year cash dividend ratio was 72.29%. However, the higher dividend ratio reflects the decreased net income which resulted primarily from increased provision for loan losses and increased FDIC insurance premiums and special FDIC assessment. Dividends are typically paid on a quarterly basis. Future dividends are subject to the discretion of CTBI’s Board of Directors, cash needs, general business conditions, dividends from our subsidiaries, and applicable governmental regulations and policies. For information concerning restrictions on dividends from the subsidiary bank to CTBI, see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements included herein for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Stock Repurchases

CTBI did not acquire any shares of common stock through the stock repurchase program during the year 2009. We repurchased 93,500 shares of common stock during 2008, leaving 288,519 shares remaining under CTBI's current repurchase authorization. For further information, see the Liquidity and Market Risk section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Common Stock Performance

The following graph shows the cumulative return experienced by CTBI's shareholders during the last five years compared to the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) and the NASDAQ Bank Stock Index. The graph assumes the investment of $100 on December 31, 2004 in CTBI's common stock and in each index and the reinvestment of all dividends paid during the five-year period.

Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return

among Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.),

and NASDAQ Bank Stocks

Fiscal Year Ending December 31 ($)
	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.	100.00	98.05	135.78	93.60	128.93	89.99
NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.)	100.00	102.13	112.19	121.68	58.64	84.28
NASDAQ Bank Stocks	100.00	97.69	109.64	86.90	63.36	53.09

Item 6. Selected Financial Data 2005-2009

(in thousands except per share amounts and # of employees)
Year Ended December 31	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
Interest income	$	153,050		$	167,611		$	196,864		$	189,305		$	160,322
Interest expense		47,540			63,974			90,832			81,538			57,117
Net interest income		105,510			103,637			106,032			107,767			103,205
Provision for loan losses		17,468			11,452			6,540			4,305			8,285
Noninterest income		41,420			21,767			36,608			32,559			33,467
Noninterest expense		93,801			82,532			83,055			80,407			78,569
Income before income taxes		35,661			31,420			53,045			55,614			49,818
Income taxes		10,602			8,347			16,418			16,550			15,406
Net income	$	25,059		$	23,073		$	36,627		$	39,064		$	34,412

Per common share:
Basic earnings per share	$	1.66		$	1.54		$	2.42		$	2.59		$	2.31
Cash dividends declared-	$	1.20		$	1.17		$	1.10		$	1.05		$	0.98
as a % of net income		72.29	%		75.97	%		45.45	%		40.54	%		42.42	%
Book value, end of year	$	21.17		$	20.46		$	20.03		$	18.63		$	16.93
Market price, end of year	$	24.45		$	36.75		$	27.53		$	41.53		$	30.75
Market to book value, end of year		1.15	x		1.80	x		1.37	x		2.23	x		1.82	x
Price/earnings ratio, end of year		14.73	x		23.86	x		11.38	x		16.03	x		13.31	x
Cash dividend yield, end of year		4.91	%		3.18	%		4.00	%		2.53	%		3.19	%

At year-end:
Total assets	$	3,086,659		$	2,954,531		$	2,902,684		$	2,969,761		$	2,851,053
Long-term debt		61,341			61,341			61,341			61,341			61,341
Shareholders’ equity		321,457			308,206			301,355			282,375			253,945

Averages:
Assets	$	3,047,100		$	2,921,217		$	2,980,713		$	2,942,892		$	2,817,549
Deposits		2,409,848			2,303,720			2,352,902			2,294,385			2,217,735
Earning assets		2,830,701			2,703,054			2,760,014			2,717,325			2,601,304
Loans		2,383,875			2,283,180			2,205,431			2,131,649			2,024,756
Shareholders’ equity		317,711			308,401			294,106			269,202			246,119

Profitability ratios:
Return on average assets		0.82	%		0.79	%		1.23	%		1.33	%		1.22	%
Return on average equity		7.89			7.48			12.45			14.51			13.98

Capital ratios:
Equity to assets, end of year		10.41	%		10.43	%		10.38	%		9.51	%		8.91	%
Average equity to average assets		10.43			10.56			9.87			9.15			8.74

Risk based capital ratios:
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets)		10.38	%		10.37	%		10.32	%		9.58	%		8.94	%
Tier 1 capital
(to risk weighted assets)		12.90			13.05			13.24			12.21			11.52
Total capital
(to risk weighted assets)		14.15			14.30			14.49			13.43			12.76

Other significant ratios:
Allowance to net loans, end of year		1.34	%		1.31	%		1.26	%		1.27	%		1.40	%
Allowance to nonperforming loans, end of year		79.01			59.06			88.00			193.54			137.87
Nonperforming assets to loans and foreclosed properties, end of year		3.19			2.66			1.79			0.86			1.27

Net interest margin	3.77	%	3.88	%	3.90	%	4.02	%	4.02	%

Other statistics:
Average common shares outstanding	15,129		15,017		15,150		15,086		14,908
Number of full-time equivalent employees, end of year	982		986		1,011		1,021		1,003

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., our operations, and our present business environment. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to—and should be read in conjunction with—our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained in Item 8 of this annual report. The MD&A includes the following sections:

v	Our Business

v	Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

v	Results of Operations

v	Liquidity and Market Risk

v	Stock Repurchase Program

v	Interest Rate Risk

v	Capital Resources

v	Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

v	Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our Business

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky. At December 31, 2009, CTBI owned one commercial bank and one trust company. Through its subsidiaries, CTBI has seventy-six banking locations in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and southern West Virginia, and five trust offices across Kentucky. At December 31, 2009, CTBI had total consolidated assets of $3.1 billion and total consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $2.6 billion, making it the second largest bank holding company headquartered in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Total shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2009 was $321.5 million.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

Our accounting policies are more fully described in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods.

At December 31, 2009, all of the financial institutions holding CTBI’s or its subsidiary’s cash accounts were participating in the FDIC’s Transaction Account Guarantee Program. Under the program, through June 30, 2010, all noninterest-bearing transaction accounts at these institutions are fully guaranteed by the FDIC for the entire amount in the account.

Investments – Management determines the classification of securities at purchase. We classify securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 320, formerly Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss.

Gains or losses on disposition of securities are computed by specific identification for all securities except for shares in mutual funds, which are computed by average cost. Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.

When the fair value of a security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other than temporary impairment. The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment. If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could have a material effect on the CTBI’s results of operations and financial condition.

Available-for-Sale Securities – Available-for-sale securities are valued using the following valuation techniques:

U.S. Treasury and government agencies, state and political subdivision, U.S. government sponsored agencies, Collateralized mortgage obligations, Marketable equity securities – Level 2 Inputs. For these securities, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Marketable equity securities – Level 3 Inputs. The securities owned by CTBI that were measured using Level 3 criteria are auction rate securities issued by FNMA. These securities were valued using an independent third party. For these securities, the valuation methods used were (1) a discounted cash flow model valuation, where the expected cash flows of the securities are discounted to the present using a yield that incorporates compensation for illiquidity and (2) a market comparables method, where the securities are valued based on indications, from the secondary market, of what discounts buyers demand when purchasing similar securities. Using these methods, the auction rate securities are classified as Level 3.

Loans – Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest and an allowance for loan and lease losses. Income is recorded on the level yield basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments are brought current and future payments appear reasonably certain.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses – We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. Since arriving at an appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, we use an ongoing quarterly analysis to develop a range of estimated losses. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we use our best estimate within the range of potential credit loss to determine the appropriate ALLL. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL.

We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits. Those larger commercial credits that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated. The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as defined by ASC 310, formerly FAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. We evaluate the collectibility of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision. Historical loss rates are analyzed and applied to other commercial loans not subject to specific allocations. Historically, we have utilized a rolling eight quarter historical loss rate analysis, in determining the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios and selecting our most likely estimate of loss for each significant segment of the loan portfolio. Recognizing the current economic environment and the increased charge-offs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009, we have also calculated a four quarter rolling average and weighted this analysis more heavily in the determination of our estimated range of losses.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CTBI will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded. The associated ALLL for these loans is measured under ASC 450, formerly FAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Historically, we have utilized a rolling eight quarter historical loss rate analysis, in determining the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios and selecting our most likely estimate of loss for each significant segment of the loan portfolio. Recognizing the current economic environment and the increased charge-offs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009, we have also calculated a four quarter rolling average and weighted this analysis more heavily in the determination of our estimated range of losses.

Historical loss rates for commercial and retail loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors that we consider include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of recoveries to prior year’s charge offs, trend in loan losses, industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and underwriting exceptions. These factors are reviewed quarterly and a weighted range developed with a “most likely” scenario determined. The total of each of these weighted factors is then applied against the applicable portion of the portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted accordingly. While the actual loss rate applied to individual factors may have been adjusted during 2009 to reflect the current economic conditions, no new factors were added to the analysis nor was the range of loss rates that were applied to individual factors adjusted during the year.

Loans Held for Sale – Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated market value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized in a valuation allowance by charges to income.

Premises and Equipment – Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Capital leases are included in premises and equipment at the capitalized amount less accumulated amortization. Premises and equipment are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis.

Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives range up to 40 years for buildings, 2 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures, and equipment, and up to the lease term for leasehold improvements. Capitalized leased assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the respective leases.

Other Real Estate Owned – Real estate acquired by foreclosure is carried at the lower of the investment in the property or its fair value less estimated cost to sell. Periodically, but not less frequently than bi-annually, an updated appraisal is obtained for each property owned and any decline in the fair value is recognized by a charge to income. All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized by a charge to income.

Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible – We evaluate total goodwill and core deposit intangible for impairment, based upon ASC 350, formerly FAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and FAS 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, using fair value techniques including multiples of price/equity. Goodwill and core deposit intangible are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or as other events may warrant.

Amortization of core deposit intangible is estimated at approximately $0.4 million for year one, approximately $0.05 million annually in years two through five, and approximately $0.03 million in year six.

Transfers of Financial Assets – Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from CTBI—put presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) CTBI does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.

Income Taxes – Income tax expense is based on the taxes due on the consolidated tax return plus deferred taxes based on the expected future tax benefits and consequences of temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates.

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) – Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, excluding restricted shares.

Diluted EPS adjusts the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding by the dilutive effect of stock options, including restricted shares, as prescribed in ASC 718, formerly FAS 123R.

Segments – Management analyzes the operation of CTBI assuming one operating segment, community banking services. CTBI, through its operating subsidiaries, offers a wide range of consumer and commercial community banking services. These services include: (i) residential and commercial real estate loans; (ii) checking accounts; (iii) regular and term savings accounts and savings certificates; (iv) full service securities brokerage services; (v) consumer loans; (vi) debit cards; (vii) annuity and life insurance products; (viii) Individual Retirement Accounts and Keogh plans; (ix) commercial loans; (x) trust services; and (xi) commercial demand deposit accounts.

Bank Owned Life Insurance – CTBI’s bank owned life insurance policies are carried at their cash surrender value. We recognize tax-free income from the periodic increases in cash surrender value of these policies and from death benefits.

Mortgage Servicing Rights – Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are carried at fair market value with the implementation of ASC 860, formerly FAS 156, in January 2007. MSRs are valued using Level 3 inputs as defined in ASC 820, formerly FAS 157. The fair value is determined quarterly based on an independent third-party valuation using a discounted cash flow analysis and calculated using a computer pricing model. The computer valuation is based on key economic assumptions including the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted-average coupon, and the weighted-average default rate, as applicable. Along with the gains received from the sale of loans, fees are received for servicing loans. These fees include late fees, which are recorded in interest income, and ancillary fees and monthly servicing fees, which are recorded in noninterest income. Costs of servicing loans are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in fair market value of the MSRs are reported in mortgage banking income.

Stock Options – At December 31, 2009 and 2008, CTBI had a share-based employee compensation plan, which is described more fully in note 14 to the consolidated financial statements. CTBI accounts for this plan under the recognition and measurement principles of ASC 718, formerly FAS 123R, Share-Based Payment.

Comprehensive Income – Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities for which a portion of an other than temporary impairment has been recognized in income.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current year classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

New Accounting Standards –

Ø Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities – ASC 260, formerly FASB Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-6-1, addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method described in ASC 260-10-45, formerly paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share. This standard was effective January 1, 2009, and did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Ø Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly – ASC 820, formerly FSP FAS 157-4, affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. ASC 820 requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. CTBI did not elect to early adopt. This standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Ø Recognition and Presentation of Other Than Temporary Impairments – ASC 320, formerly FSP FAS 115-2 and FSP FAS 124-2, (i) changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under ASC 320, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. CTBI did not elect to early adopt. This standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Ø Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies – ASC 805, formerly FSP FAS 141(R)-1, requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair value of such an asset or liability cannot be reasonably estimated, the asset or liability would generally be recognized in accordance with ASC 450, formerly FAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies and FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 14, Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss. ASC 805 removes subsequent accounting guidance for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies and requires entities to develop a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies. This standard also eliminates the requirement to disclose an estimate of the range of outcomes of recognized contingencies at the acquisition date. For unrecognized contingencies, entities are required to include only the disclosures required by ASC 450, formerly FAS 5. The standard also requires that contingent consideration arrangements of an acquiree assumed by the acquirer in a business combination be treated as contingent consideration of the acquirer and should be initially and subsequently measured at fair value in accordance with the standard. This standard is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies CTBI acquires in business combinations occurring after January 1, 2009.

Ø Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets – In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 860, formerly FAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — An Amendment of FAS 140. ASC 860 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire financial asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. The new standard became effective for CTBI on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on CTBI’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Ø Determining When to Consolidate Variable Purpose Entities – In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810, formerly FAS 167 — Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). ASC 810 requires an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether an entity’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This standard requires ongoing reassessments of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and enhanced disclosures that provide more transparent information about an entity’s involvement with a variable interest entity. The new standard became effective for CTBI on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on CTBI’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Ø Codification of Authoritative Accounting Principles – In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105, formerly FAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC 105 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretative releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The new standard became effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on CTBI’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Ø Disclosures Regarding Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets – In December 2008, the FASB issued ASC 715, formerly FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This standard requires disclosure of the fair value of each major category of plan assets for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. The new standard became effective for CTBI on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on CTBI’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Ø Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements – In January 2010, the FASB released Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends ASC Subtopic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and Subtopic 715-20, Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans. The new standard expands the existing fair value disclosures required by these two subtopics. Additional disclosures required by the new standard must be made for each period beginning after the effective date. Expansion of disclosures for prior periods to include those required by the ASU is optional.

Disclosure changes made by ASU 2010-06 include:

·	The amounts of and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements and the accounting policy for the date used to recognize such transfers, e.g., actual transaction date, beginning of reporting period date or end of reporting period date

·	Presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements as separate lines, rather than one net number, in the table reconciling activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs

Provision of fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities with a class often being a subset of assets or liabilities within a balance sheet line item. Class should be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of investments in debt and equity securities and generally will not require change from the classifications already employed in disclosures for those investments

·	Provision of explanations about the valuation techniques and inputs used to determine fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements falling in either Level 2 or Level 3

·	Revision of the existing disclosures made by a plan sponsor about fair value for assets of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans to require those disclosures be made by asset class instead of asset category

ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The one exception involves reporting certain items gross instead of net in the existing activity table for items measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years and may be adopted earlier if desired. Except for the Level 3 table item, each SEC issuer must apply the ASU starting with its first interim period beginning after December 15, 2009. While CTBI did not elect to early adopt the provisions which are effective for years beginning after December 15, 2009, we may elect early adoption of the December 15, 2010 provisions. ASU 2010-06 is not expected to have a material impact on CTBI’s consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

2009 Compared to 2008

CTBI reported increased earnings for the year 2009. Earnings per basic share for the year 2009 were $1.66 compared to $1.54 for the same period in 2008. Average shares outstanding increased from 15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Year over year basic earnings per share increased $0.12 per share. 2009 earnings were impacted by increased provision for loan losses ($0.26 per share impact after-tax), increased FDIC insurance premiums and special FDIC assessment ($0.23 per share impact after-tax), and increased noninterest income compared to 2008 which was impacted by the other than temporary impairment (OTTI) charges on investment securities of $14.6 million ($0.62 per share impact after-tax).

v	The significant increase in provision for loan losses was driven by increased charge-offs in 1-4 family commercial real estate loans with specific reserves and to a lesser extent consumer loans, and it supports loan growth of $87.1 million for the year.

v	Net loan charge-offs for the year 2009 increased $7.0 million from prior year.

v	Noninterest income was impacted by increased gains on sales of loans and loan related fees due to the refinancing of mortgage loans and an increase in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights.

Noninterest expense increased year over year as a result of increases in legal fees, net expenses related to other real estate owned, and repossession expense as CTBI works through its problem real estate loans resulting from the decline in the housing market and consumers and small businesses are being impacted by current economic conditions. CTBI also experienced increased FDIC insurance premiums including the special FDIC assessment and increased personnel expense.

v	Our net interest margin for the year was 11 basis points below prior year.

v	Our loan portfolio grew $87.1 million or 3.7% with growth in the commercial and consumer loan portfolios offset by a decline in the residential loan portfolio.

Nonperforming loans decreased to $41.3 million compared to $52.2 million at December 31, 2008. The year over year decrease in nonperforming loans was in both the 90 day and accruing and the nonaccrual classifications. Nonperforming assets increased $16.1 million from prior year-end, December 31, 2008, as a result of increased other real estate owned.

v	Our investment portfolio declined $8.4 million year over year.

v	Our tangible common equity/tangible assets ratio remains strong at 8.47%.

v	Return on average assets for the year was 0.82% compared to 0.79% for the year 2008. Return on average equity was 7.89% compared to 7.48%.

Net Interest Income:

Our net interest margin decreased 11 basis points compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. Net interest income for the year 2009 increased 1.8% with a 4.7% increase in average earning assets compared to 2008. The yield on average earnings assets for the year 2009 decreased 80 basis points in comparison to the 86 basis point decline in the cost of interest bearing funds.

Provision for Loan Losses and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:

The provision for loan losses that was added to the allowance for 2009 increased $6.0 million from the year 2008. This provision represented a charge against current earnings in order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level determined using the accounting estimates described in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section. Our loan loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2009 increased to 1.34% compared to 1.31% at December 31, 2008. The adequacy of our loan loss reserves is analyzed quarterly and adjusted as necessary with a focus on maintaining appropriate reserves for potential losses.

CTBI's total nonperforming loans were $41.3 million at December 31, 2009, a decrease from the $52.2 million at December 31, 2008. Loans past-due 30-89 days at December 31, 2009 were $24.8 million, a decrease of $2.9 million from the $27.7 million at December 31, 2008. Our loan portfolio management processes focus on the immediate identification, management, and resolution of problem loans to maximize recovery and minimize loss.

CTBI as a matter of practice does not offer high risk loans such as option ARM products, high loan to value ratio mortgages, interest-only loans, loans with initial teaser rates, or loans with negative amortizations, and therefore, CTBI would have no significant exposure to these products..

Foreclosed properties increased to $37.3 million from the $10.4 million at December 31, 2008, as problem real estate loans are working their way through the legal system, which remains strained due to current economic conditions, and CTBI continues working through a prolonged foreclosure process. Sales of foreclosed properties for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled $7.0 million. Net loss on sales of foreclosed properties in 2009 totaled $45 thousand. New foreclosed properties totaled $33.3 million and are carried at the lesser of book value or appraised value less cost to sell. Our nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties remain primarily concentrated in our Central Kentucky Region. The major classifications of other real estate owned are shown in the following table:

(in thousands) December 31	2009		2008
1-4 family	$	18,388	$	8,003
Agricultural/farmland		128		111
Construction/land development/other		7,414		1,084
Multifamily		4,117		0
Non-farm/non-residential		7,286		1,227
Total other real estate owned	$	37,333	$	10,425

Net loan charge-offs for the year 2009 were $15.6 million, or 0.66% of average loans, compared to prior year's $8.7 million, or 0.38% of average loans. Of the total net charge-offs, $9.4 million was in commercial loans with specific reserve allocations, $3.3 million was in indirect auto loans, and $1.3 million was in residential real estate mortgage loans. Specific reserves covered 88.8% of the commercial loan charge-offs. Specific reserves are not allocated for indirect auto loans or residential real estate mortgage loans during the credit review process. Indirect auto loans are charged-off within 90 days of becoming past due.

Noninterest Income:

Noninterest income for the year 2009 increased 14.0% over 2008 after normalizing for the $14.5 million in other than temporary impairment charges taken in 2008. The year over year increase included a $2.7 million increase in gains on sales of mortgage loans and a $1.8 million increase in loan related fees driven primarily by a $1.2 million change in the fair value of our mortgage servicing rights.

Noninterest Expense:

Noninterest expense for the year 2009 increased 13.7% from 2008 with increases in FDIC insurance premiums and personnel costs, along with increased legal fees, repossession expenses, and other real estate owned expenses as CTBI continues to work through nonperforming assets primarily associated with the decline in the real estate market in Central Kentucky.

Balance Sheet Review:

CTBI’s total assets at $3.1 billion increased 4.5% from prior year-end. Loans outstanding at December 31, 2009 were $2.4 billion with a 3.7% growth from December 31, 2008. Year over year loan growth occurred in the commercial and consumer loan portfolios with commercial loans increasing $44.7 million and consumer loans increasing $46.1 million. The residential loan portfolio declined by $3.7 million during 2009 due to significant refinancing of portfolio mortgage loans into the long-term fixed rate secondary market. CTBI's investment portfolio decreased 2.9% from prior year. Deposits, including repurchase agreements, at $2.6 billion increased 6.2% from prior year. Other interest bearing liabilities declined from prior year resulting from the payoff of a $40 million FHLB advance. The deposit (including repurchase agreements) to FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio increased to $2.7 million at December 31, 2009 from $2.5 million at December 31, 2008.

Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2009 was $321.5 million compared to $308.2 million at December 31, 2008. CTBI's annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of December 31, 2009 was 4.91%.

2008 Compared to 2007

CTBI reported earnings of $23.1 million or $1.54 per basic share for the year 2008 compared to $36.6 million or $2.42 per basic share for the year 2007. Average shares outstanding decreased from 15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

During 2008, CTBI recorded other than temporary impairment charges of $14.5 million, $1.1 million of which was recorded in the fourth quarter 2008, based upon the current market value of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae trust preferred pass-through auction rate securities. CTBI held $14.9 million of these securities on June 30, 2008. The market value of all auction rate securities held by CTBI at December 31, 2008 was $0.5 million. CTBI also recorded a $1.5 million decline in the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights during 2008, $1.1 million of which occurred in the fourth quarter 2008, and increased its provision for loan losses by $4.9 million year over year. Additionally, economic conditions combined with the current interest rate environment continued to put pressure on CTBI’s net interest margin and impact its asset quality contributing to lower earnings for the fourth quarter and year 2008.

v	CTBI's basic earnings per share decreased $0.88 from prior year, primarily as a result of other than temporary impairment charges during the third and fourth quarters 2008 and a $4.9 million increase in our allocation to our reserve for losses on loans.

Pressure continued on our net interest margin due to the current interest rate environment and economic conditions. Our net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased 2 basis points from prior year, and net interest income decreased $2.4 million from prior year as average earning assets decreased by $57.0 million.

Noninterest income was impacted by $14.5 million in other than temporary impairment (OTTI) charges for auction rate securities. Core noninterest income showed slight increases from prior year with increases in gains on sales of loans, deposit service charges, and trust revenue; however these increases were offset by a decrease in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights.

v	Noninterest expense controls were positive during 2008 as we experienced a decline in total noninterest expense which was driven by decreases in both personnel and occupancy and equipment expenses.

v	Our efficiency ratio for the year 2008 increased 77 basis points from 2007 to 58.39%.

v	Nonperforming loans increased to $52.2 million at December 31, 2008 compared to $31.9 million at prior year-end.

v	Our loan portfolio increased 5.4% during the year with $120.8 million in growth.

v	Our investment portfolio decreased $64.1 million year over year primarily resulting from the use of the liquidity in the portfolio to fund loan growth and manage the net interest margin and the OTTI charges for auction rate securities.

CTBI’s effective income tax rate was 26.44% for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to 31.18% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The reduced income tax rate was driven by the increase in the ratio of tax exempt income to total income and the adjustment of a tax deferred item in the fourth quarter 2008 which had a positive impact to earnings of $0.04 per share.

v	Return on average assets for the year was 0.79% compared to 1.23% for the year 2007. Return on average equity was 7.48% compared to 12.45%.

Net Interest Income:

Our net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased 2 basis points compared to the same period in 2007. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2008 decreased $2.4 million from prior year as the cost of interest bearing funds decreased 108 basis points while the yield on average earning assets decreased 94 basis points and average earning assets declined $57.0 million.

Provision for Loan Losses and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:

The provision for loan losses that was added to the allowance for 2008 increased $4.9 million from the year 2007. This provision represented a charge against current earnings in order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level determined using the accounting estimates described in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section. Our loan loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2008 increased to 1.31% compared to 1.26% at December 31, 2007. The adequacy of our loan loss reserve is analyzed quarterly and adjusted as necessary.

Nonperforming loans increased during the year by $20.3 million with increases in all of our regions. CTBI's total nonperforming loans at December 31, 2008 were $52.2 million compared to $31.9 million at December 31, 2007. Our loan portfolio management processes focus on maintaining appropriate reserves for potential losses.

An increase in nonperforming loans does not necessitate a corollary increase in the amount of loan loss reserves. Nonperforming loans include loans that are 90 days or more past due as well as nonaccrual loans and restructured debt. A loan that is 90 days or more past due must be placed on nonaccrual unless it is well secured and in the process of collection. If it has not been placed on nonaccrual it has met both criteria, especially that of "well secured", and thereby would require no specific reserve. A loan is placed on nonaccrual when, by definition, the bank does not anticipate collecting all of its principal and/or interest. CTBI had several loans that were secured by real estate that we did not anticipate collecting all of the interest owed but, with current appraisals performed, did anticipate collecting all of the principal. In this instance, while the interest accrued would have been reversed, and the loan placed on nonaccrual, no additional specific reserve was required because we anticipated collecting all of the principal.

Foreclosed properties increased during 2008 to $10.4 million from the $7.9 million at December 31, 2007. Sales of foreclosed properties during 2008 totaled $5.0 million while new foreclosed properties totaled $7.7 million. Our nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties remain concentrated in our Central Kentucky Region. The increase in the Central Kentucky Region was primarily attributable to borrowers adversely impacted by the continuing weakness in the housing market and the resulting increase in time required by the legal process for movement from foreclosure to liquidation. The Central Kentucky Region continued to experience the most stress from the current housing crisis.

Net loan charge-offs for the year increased from $6.0 million for 2007 to $8.7 million for 2008 with most losses derived from our Central Kentucky Region as we continued to work through the region’s overbuilt housing market.

Noninterest Income:

The significant decline in noninterest income year over year occurred as a result of the $14.5 million other than temporary impairment charges for auction rate securities, as well as the $1.5 million decline in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. We experienced increases year over year in the core banking noninterest income areas of gains on sales of loans, deposit service charges, and trust revenue which were partially offset by the decline in loan fees driven by the decline in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights.

Noninterest Expense:

Noninterest expense controls were positive during 2008 as we experienced a decline in total noninterest expense which was driven by decreases in both personnel and occupancy and equipment expenses. Commensurate with the U.S. Treasury placing Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship, noninterest expense for the year 2008 was impacted by a $0.8 million charge relative to trust activity for which CTBI had financial responsibility. The decrease in expenses would have been larger except for this $0.8 million charge.

Balance Sheet Review:

CTBI’s total assets at $3.0 billion increased 1.8% from prior year. Loans outstanding at December 31, 2008 were $2.3 billion reflecting a 5.4% growth from December 31, 2007. CTBI's investment portfolio, however, decreased 18.0% from prior year as a result of the use of the liquidity in our investment portfolio to fund loan growth and the other than temporary impairment charges for auction rate securities. Deposits, including repurchase agreements, at $2.5 billion increased 1.5% from prior year. The deposit (including repurchase agreements) to FTE (full-time equivalent) ratio increased to $2.5 million at December 31, 2008 from $2.4 million at December 31, 2007.

Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2008 was $308.2 million compared to $301.4 at December 31, 2007. CTBI's annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of December 31, 2008 was 3.27%.

Liquidity and Market Risk

The objective of CTBI’s Asset/Liability management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within our policy limits. This objective is accomplished through management of our consolidated balance sheet composition, liquidity, and interest rate risk exposures arising from changing economic conditions, interest rates, and customer preferences. The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand or deposit withdrawals. This is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, maintaining sufficient unused borrowing capacity, and growth in core deposits. As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $142.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $270.2 million in securities valued at estimated fair value designated as available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis. Additional asset-driven liquidity is provided by the remainder of the securities portfolio and the repayment of loans. In addition to core deposit funding, we also have a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources available. We also rely on Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of our asset/liability position. Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $20.7 million at December 31, 2009 compared to $60.7 million at December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2009, we had a $294.8 million available borrowing position with the Federal Home Loan Bank. We generally rely upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash for our investing activities. As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing facilities such as repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, and issuance of long-term debt. At December 31, 2009, we had a $12 million revolving line of credit, all of which is currently available to meet any future cash needs. Our primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations. We do not rely on any one source of liquidity and manage availability in response to changing consolidated balance sheet needs.

Stock Repurchase Program

CTBI’s stock repurchase program began in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000. CTBI issued a press release on May 13, 2003 announcing its intention to repurchase up to 1,000,000 additional shares. During the years 2007 and 2008, we repurchased 196,500 and 93,500 shares, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, a total of 2,211,481 shares have been repurchased through this program. The following table shows Board authorizations and repurchases made through the stock repurchase program for the years 1998 through 2009:

	Board Authorizations	Repurchases*		Shares Available for Repurchase
	Board Authorizations	Average Price ($)	# of Shares	Shares Available for Repurchase
1998	500,000	-	0
1999	0	15.89	131,517
2000	1,000,000	11.27	694,064
2001	0	14.69	444,945
2002	0	19.48	360,287
2003	1,000,000	21.58	235,668
2004	0	25.45	55,000
2005	0	-	0
2006	0	-	0
2007	0	31.42	196,500
2008	0	28.08	93,500
2009	0	-	0
Total	2,500,000	17.52	2,211,481	288,519

*Repurchased shares and average prices have been restated to reflect stock dividends that have occurred; however, board authorized shares have not been adjusted.

Interest Rate Risk

CTBI’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which includes executive and senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk within Board-approved policy limits. Our current exposure to interest rate risks is determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest income spread evenly over the twelve-month period.

The following table shows our estimated earnings sensitivity profile as of December 31, 2009:

Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	Percentage Change in Net Interest Income (12 Months)
+400	3.50%
+300	2.37%
+200	1.29%
+100	0.53%
-25	(0.15)%

The following table shows CTBI’s estimated earnings sensitivity profile as of December 31, 2008:

Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	Percentage Change in Net Interest Income (12 Months)
+300	7.12%
+200	4.54%
+100	2.21%
-25	(0.64)%

The simulation model used the yield curve spread evenly over a twelve-month period. The measurement at December 31, 2009 estimates that our net interest income in an up-rate environment would increase by 3.50% at a 400 basis point change, 2.37% increase at a 300 basis point change, 1.29% increase at a 200 basis point change, and a 0.53% increase at a 100 basis point change. In a down-rate environment, a 25 basis point decrease in interest rates would decrease net interest income by 0.15% over one year. In order to reduce the exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to manage liquidity, we have developed sale procedures for several types of interest-sensitive assets. Virtually all long-term, fixed rate single family residential mortgage loans underwritten according to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation guidelines are sold for cash upon origination. Periodically, additional assets such as commercial loans are also sold. In 2009 and 2008, $217.5 million and $83.7 million, respectively, was realized on the sale of fixed rate residential mortgages. We focus our efforts on consistent net interest revenue and net interest margin growth through each of the retail and wholesale business lines. We do not currently engage in trading activities.

The preceding analysis was prepared using a rate ramp analysis which attempts to spread changes evenly over a specified time period as opposed to a rate shock which measures the impact of an immediate change. Had these measurements been prepared using the rate shock method, the results would vary.

Our Static Repricing GAP as of December 31, 2009 is presented below. In the 12 month repricing GAP, rate sensitive liabilities (“RSL”) exceeded rate sensitive assets (“RSA”) by $146.2 million.

	1-3 Months			4-6 Months			7-9 Months			10-12 Months			2-3 Years			4-5 Years			> 5 Years

Assets	$	1,301,536		$	223,498		$	182,959		$	150,057		$	551,896		$	165,041		$	511,671

Liabilities and Equity		820,124			279,765			291,062			613,319			658,662			11,241			412,484

Repricing difference		481,412			(56,268	)		(108,103	)		(463,262	)		(106,766	)		153,800			99,187

Cumulative GAP		481,412			425,144			317,041			(146,221	)		(252,987	)		(99,187	)		0

RSA/RSL		1.59	x		0.80	x		0.63	x		0.24	x		0.84	x		14.68	x		1.24	x

Cumulative GAP to total assets		15.60	%		13.77	%		10.27	%		(4.74	)%		(8.20	)%		(3.21	)%		0.00	%

Capital Resources

We continue to grow our shareholders’ equity while also providing an annual dividend yield for the year 2009 of 4.91% to shareholders. Shareholders’ equity increased 4.3% from December 31, 2008 to $321.5 million at December 31, 2009. Our primary source of capital growth is the retention of earnings. Cash dividends were $1.20 per share for 2009 and $1.17 per share for 2008. We retained 27.7% of our earnings in 2009 compared to 24.0% in 2008.

Regulatory guidelines require bank holding companies, commercial banks, and savings banks to maintain certain minimum capital ratios and define companies as “well-capitalized” that sufficiently exceed the minimum ratios. The banking regulators may alter minimum capital requirements as a result of revising their internal policies and their ratings of individual institutions. To be “well-capitalized” banks and bank holding companies must maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of no less than 5.0%, a Tier 1 risk based ratio of no less than 6.0%, and a total risk based ratio of no less than 10.0%. Our ratios as of December 31, 2009 were 10.38%, 12.90%, and 14.15%, respectively, all exceeding the threshold for meeting the definition of “well-capitalized.” See note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

As of December 31, 2009, we are not aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material adverse impact on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations, except as noted in the Banking Reform section of Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Deposit Insurance

Substantially all of the deposits of CTBI are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DFI) of the FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. The FDIC utilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance premiums based upon a risk matrix that takes into account a bank’s capital level and supervisory rating (“CAMELS rating”). The risk matrix utilizes four risk categories which are distinguished by capital levels and supervisory ratings.

In December 2008, the FDIC issued a final rule that raised the then current assessment rates uniformly by seven basis points for the first quarter of 2009 assessment, which resulted in annualized assessment rates for institutions in the highest risk category (“Risk Category 1 institutions”) ranging from 12 to 14 basis points (basis points representing cents per $100 of assessable deposits). In February 2009, the FDIC issued final rules to amend the DIF restoration plan, change the risk-based assessment system and set assessment rates for Risk Category 1 institutions beginning in the second quarter of 2009. For Risk Category 1 institutions that have long-term debt issuer ratings, the FDIC determines the initial base assessment rate using a combination of weighted average CAMELS component ratings, long-term debt issuer ratings (converted to numbers and averaged) and the financial ratios method assessment rate (as defined), each equally weighted. The initial base assessment rates for Risk Category 1 institutions range from 12 to 16 basis points, on an annualized basis. After the effect of potential base-rate adjustments, total base assessment rates range from 7 to 24 basis points. The potential adjustments to a Risk Category 1 institution’s initial base assessment rate include (i) a potential decrease of up to five basis points for long-term unsecured debt, including senior and subordinated debt and (ii) a potential increase of up to eight basis points for secured liabilities in excess of 25% of domestic deposits.

In May 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule which levied a special assessment applicable to all insured depository institutions totaling five basis points of each institution’s total assets less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, not to exceed 10 basis points of domestic deposits. The special assessment was part of the FDIC’s efforts to rebuild the DIF. Deposit insurance expense during 2009 included $1.3 million recognized in the second quarter related to the special assessment.

In November 2009, the FDIC issued a rule that required all insured depository institutions, with limited exceptions, to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The FDIC also adopted a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011. In December 2009, CTBI paid $14.2 million in prepaid risk-based assessment, which included $0.9 million related to the fourth quarter of 2009 that would have otherwise been payable in the first quarter of 2010. This amount is included in deposit insurance expense for 2009. The remaining $13.3 million in prepaid deposit insurance is included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.

FDIC insurance expense totaled $5.8 million, $0.3 million, and $0.3 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, FDIC insurance expense includes deposit insurance assessments and Financing Corporation (ICO) assessments.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, CTBI differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investment in nonmonetary assets, such as fixed assets and inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio. Inflation also affects other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of general inflation.

We believe one of the most significant impacts on financial and operating results is our ability to react to changes in interest rates. We seek to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.

Our success is dependent on the general economic conditions of the communities we serve. Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide financial and banking services primarily to eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and southern West Virginia. The economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on loan demand, the ability of borrowers to repay loans, and the value of the collateral securing loans. A significant decline in general economic conditions will affect these local economic conditions and will negatively affect the financial results of our banking operations. Factors influencing general conditions include inflation, recession, unemployment, and other factors beyond our control.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, we have certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts. At December 31, 2009, the aggregate contractual obligations and commitments are:

Contractual Obligations:	Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)	Total		1 Year		2-5 Years		After 5 Years
Deposits without stated maturity	$	1,146,448	$	1,146,448	$	0	$	0
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits		1,315,761		1,229,948		84,535		1,278
Repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings		192,676		192,676		0		0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		20,671		20,617		32		22
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank*		26		21		3		2
Long-term debt		61,341		0		0		61,341
Interest on long-term debt*		109,984		3,999		15,998		89,987
Annual rental commitments under leases		9,888		1,570		4,349		3,969
Total	$	2,856,795	$	2,595,279	$	104,917	$	156,599

*The amounts provided as interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank and interest on long-term debt assume the liabilities will not be prepaid and interest is calculated to their individual maturities.

Other Commitments:	Amount of Commitment - Expiration by Period
(in thousands)	Total		1 Year		2-5 Years		After 5 Years
Standby letters of credit	$	58,641	$	42,063	$	16,578	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		366,461		295,495		65,741		5,225
Total	$	425,102	$	337,558	$	82,319	$	5,225

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements in that these commitments often expire without being drawn upon.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

CTBI currently does not engage in any hedging activity or any derivative activity which management considers material. Analysis of CTBI’s interest rate sensitivity can be found in the Liquidity and Market Risk section of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands) December 31	2009			2008
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	62,720		$	71,811
Interest bearing deposits		31,814			23,187
Federal funds sold		47,595			45,880
Cash and cash equivalents		142,129			140,878

Other investments		100			100
Securities available-for-sale at fair value
(amortized cost of $263,756 and $265,999, respectively)		270,237			267,376
Securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost
(fair value of $14,435 and $25,496, respectively)		14,336			25,597
Loans held for sale		1,818			623

Loans		2,435,760			2,348,651
Allowance for loan losses		(32,643	)		(30,821	)
Net loans		2,403,117			2,317,830

Premises and equipment, net		49,242			51,590
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		29,048			29,040
Goodwill		65,059			65,059
Core deposit intangible (net of accumulated amortization of $6,857 and
$6,222, respectively)		648			1,282
Bank owned life insurance		38,117			24,135
Mortgage servicing rights		3,406			2,168
Other real estate owned		37,333			10,425
Other assets		32,069			18,428
Total assets	$	3,086,659		$	2,954,531

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Deposits
Noninterest bearing	$	490,809		$	450,360
Interest bearing		1,971,400			1,881,474
Total deposits		2,462,209			2,331,834

Repurchase agreements		180,471			157,422
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings		12,205			11,492
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		20,671			60,727
Long-term debt		61,341			61,341
Other liabilities		28,305			23,509
Total liabilities		2,765,202			2,646,325

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued		-			-
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000;
shares outstanding 2009 – 15,183,987; 2008 – 15,066,248		75,920			75,331
Capital surplus		152,484			150,037
Retained earnings		88,840			81,943
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax		4,213			895
Total shareholders’ equity		321,457			308,206

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,086,659		$	2,954,531

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands except per share data) Year Ended December 31	2009		2008			2007
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans, including loans held for sale	$	139,736	$	150,221		$	171,307
Interest and dividends on securities
Taxable		9,569		12,635			17,384
Tax exempt		1,845		1,869			1,915
Interest and dividends on Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home
Loan Bank stock		1,402		1,559			1,794
Other, including interest on federal funds sold		498		1,327			4,464
Total interest income		153,050		167,611			196,864

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		39,793		53,849			75,637
Interest on repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings		2,457		4,424			8,429
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		1,291		1,701			2,402
Interest on long-term debt		3,999		4,000			4,364
Total interest expense		47,540		63,974			90,832

Net interest income		105,510		103,637			106,032
Provision for loan losses		17,468		11,452			6,540
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		88,042		92,185			99,492

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		21,970		21,886			21,003
Gains on sales of loans, net		4,324		1,583			1,338
Trust income		5,047		4,929			4,859
Loan related fees		3,817		2,045			3,196
Bank owned life insurance		1,241		1,008			1,108
Securities gains and losses		654		(50	)		0
Other than temporary impairment		0		(14,514	)		0
Other		4,367		4,880			5,104
Total noninterest income		41,420		21,767			36,608

Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		43,561		42,223			42,298
Occupancy, net		6,836		6,787			6,713
Equipment		4,679		4,356			4,896
Data processing		6,064		5,634			4,951
Bank franchise tax		3,684		3,596			3,464
Legal and professional fees		3,745		3,066			3,178
FDIC insurance		5,795		328			275
Other real estate owned provision and expense		3,281		722			754
Other		16,156		15,820			16,526
Total noninterest expense		93,801		82,532			83,055

Income before income taxes		35,661		31,420			53,045
Income taxes		10,602		8,347			16,418
Net income	$	25,059	$	23,073		$	36,627

Basic earnings per share	$	1.66	$	1.54		$	2.42
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.65	$	1.52		$	2.38

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(in thousands except per share and share amounts)	Common Shares			Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax			Total
Balance, January 1, 2007		15,158,176		$	75,791		$	150,965		$	58,879		$	(3,260	)	$	282,375
Net income											36,627						36,627
Net change in unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax of ($1,152)														2,138			2,138
Comprehensive income																	38,765
Cumulative effect – application of new accounting standards (SFAS 156 and FIN 48)											(621	)					(621	)
Cash dividends declared ($1.10 per share)											(16,634	)					(16,634	)
Issuance of common stock		82,448			412			2,348									2,760
Purchase of common stock		(196,500	)		(982	)		(5,203	)								(6,185	)
Stock-based compensation and related excess tax benefits								895									895
Balance, December 31, 2007		15,044,124			75,221			149,005			78,251			(1,122	)		301,355
Net income											23,073						23,073
Net change in unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax of ($1,086)														2,017			2,017
Comprehensive income																	25,090
Cumulative effect – application of new accounting standards (EITF 06-4)											(1,820	)					(1,820	)
Cash dividends declared ($1.17 per share)											(17,561	)					(17,561	)
Issuance of common stock		115,624			578			2,153									2,731
Purchase of common stock		(93,500	)		(468	)		(2,163	)								(2,631	)
Stock-based compensation and related excess tax benefits								1,042									1,042
Balance, December 31, 2008		15,066,248			75,331			150,037			81,943			895			308,206
Net income											25,059						25,059
Net change in unrealized gain/loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax of ($1,786)														3,318			3,318
Comprehensive income																	28,377
Cash dividends declared ($1.20 per share)											(18,162	)					(18,162	)
Issuance of common stock		117,739			589			1,703									2,292
Stock-based compensation and related excess tax benefits								947									947
Other adjustments								(203	)								(203	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		15,183,987		$	75,920		$	152,484		$	88,840		$	4,213		$	321,457

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands) Year Ended December 31	2009			2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	25,059		$	23,073		$	36,627
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		5,239			5,106			5,665
Change in net deferred tax liability		2,918			(5,774	)		955
Stock-based compensation		556			712			649
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		391			330			245
Provision for loan and other real estate losses		18,836			11,718			6,979
Securities (gains)/losses		(654	)		50			0
Other than temporary impairment charges		0			14,514			0
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale		(4,324	)		(1,584	)		(1,338	)
Losses on sale of fixed assets and other real estate owned, net		56			370			65
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		217,458			83,678			74,578
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale		(214,328	)		(80,383	)		(74,143	)
Amortization/(accretion) of securities premiums and discounts, net		2,121			(156	)		518
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(1,037	)		(850	)		(957	)
Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights		107			1,503			558
Amortization/write-off of debt issuance costs		0			0			1,950
Changes in:
Other liabilities		241			(2,026	)		(504	)
Other assets		(14,950	)		4,481			(851	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		37,689			54,762			50,996

Cash flows from investing activities:
Securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from sales		43,415			30,100			130,400
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities		97,397			72,597			48,315
Purchase of securities		(139,999	)		(57,271	)		(74,177	)
Securities held-to-maturity:
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities		11,705			7,408			7,481
Purchase of securities		(480	)		0			0
Other short-term investments
Purchase of securities		(29,400	)		0			0
Proceeds from maturities		29,400			0			0
Change in loans, net		(135,211	)		(136,464	)		(73,690	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(2,265	)		(3,184	)		(2,757	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		24			14			18
Additional investment in equity securities		(11	)		(980	)		(33	)
Redemption of equity securities		3			0			0
Redemption of investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries		0			0			1,841
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries		0			0			(1,841	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and repossessed assets		5,999			4,447			3,173
Additional investment in other real estate owned		(1,928	)		(130	)		(21	)
Additional investment in bank owned life insurance		(12,945	)		0			(1,391	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(134,296	)		(83,463	)		37,318

Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in deposits, net		130,375			38,670			(48,003	)
Change in repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings, net		23,762			(8,430	)		(226	)
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		20,000			20,000			0
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(60,056	)		(179	)		(40,339	)
Payment for redemption of junior subordinated debentures		0			0			(61,341	)
Issuance of junior subordinated debentures		0			0			61,341
Issuance of common stock		2,292			2,731			2,760
Purchase of common stock		0			(2,631	)		(6,185	)
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		(391	)		(330	)		(245	)
Dividends paid		(18,124	)		(17,402	)		(16,364	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		97,858			32,429			(108,602	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,251			3,728			(20,288	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		140,878			137,150			157,438
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	142,129		$	140,878		$	137,150

Supplemental disclosures:
Income taxes paid	$	6,695		$	16,428		$	10,913
Interest paid		49,424			65,240			91,237
Non-cash activities
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets		946			970			730
Common stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter		4,561			4,523			4,363
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		33,301			7,995			7,488
Other than temporary impairment of investment securities		0			14,514			0

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation – The consolidated financial statements include Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) and its subsidiaries, including its principal subsidiary, Community Trust Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”). Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Nature of Operations – Substantially all assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses are related to banking operations, including lending, investing of funds, obtaining of deposits, trust operations, full service brokerage operations, and other financing activities. All of our business offices and the majority of our business are located in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky and southern West Virginia.

Use of Estimates – In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management must make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported for assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as affecting the disclosures provided. Future results could differ from the current estimates. Such estimates include, but are not limited to, the allowance for loan and lease losses, valuation of other real estate owned, fair value of securities and mortgage servicing rights, and goodwill (the excess of cost over net assets acquired).

The current protracted economic decline continues to present financial institutions with circumstances and challenges, which in some cases have resulted in large and unanticipated declines in the fair values of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and capital, and significant credit quality problems, including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to CTBI.

Given the volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments in asset values, the allowance for loan losses, and capital.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

Available-for-Sale Securities – Available-for-sale securities are valued using the following valuation techniques:

U.S. Treasury and government agencies, state and political subdivision, U.S. government sponsored agencies, Collateralized mortgage obligations, Marketable equity securities – Level 2 Inputs. For these securities, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information, and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Other Real Estate – Real estate acquired by foreclosure is carried at the lower of the investment in the property or its fair value less estimated cost to sell. Periodically, but not less frequently than bi-annually, an updated appraisal is obtained for each property owned and any decline in the fair value is recognized by a charge to income. All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized by a charge to income.

New Accounting Standards –

Disclosure changes made by ASU 2010-06 include:

·	The amounts of and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements and the accounting policy for the date used to recognize such transfers, e.g., actual transaction date, beginning of reporting period date or end of reporting period date

·	Presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements as separate lines, rather than one net number, in the table reconciling activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs

·	Provision of explanations about the valuation techniques and inputs used to determine fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements falling in either Level 2 or Level 3

·	Revision of the existing disclosures made by a plan sponsor about fair value for assets of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans to require those disclosures be made by asset class instead of asset category

2. Cash and Due from Banks and Interest Bearing Deposits

Included in cash and due from banks and interest bearing deposits are amounts required to be held at the Federal Reserve or maintained in vault cash in accordance with regulatory reserve requirements. The balance requirements were $43.1 million and $41.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

3. Securities

Securities are classified into held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those that CTBI has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are those that CTBI may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	16,994	$	20	$	(283	)	$	16,731
State and political subdivisions		44,529		1,222		(94	)		45,657
U.S. government sponsored agencies		181,693		5,787		(83	)		187,397
Total debt securities		243,216		7,029		(460	)		249,785
Marketable equity securities		20,540		97		(185	)		20,452
Total available-for-sale securities	$	263,756	$	7,126	$	(645	)	$	270,237

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	1,576	$	6	$	0	$	1,582
U.S. government sponsored agencies		12,280		93		0		12,373
Other debt securities		480		0		0		480
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	14,336	$	99	$	0	$	14,435

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	18,330	$	576	$	0		$	18,906
State and political subdivisions		39,738		757		(651	)		39,844
U.S. government sponsored agencies		187,390		1,305		(390	)		188,305
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1		0		0			1
Total debt securities		245,459		2,638		(1,041	)		247,056
Marketable equity securities		20,540		0		(220	)		20,320
Total available-for-sale securities	$	265,999	$	2,638	$	(1,261	)	$	267,376

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	1,576	$	9	$	0		$	1,585
U.S. government sponsored agencies		24,021		0		(110	)		23,911
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	25,597	$	9	$	(110	)	$	25,496

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2009 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	9,937	$	10,068	$	195	$	198
Due after one through five years		15,218		15,862		200		202
Due after five through ten years		21,588		21,333		0		0
Due after ten years		14,780		15,125		1,181		1,182
U.S. government sponsored agencies		181,693		187,397		12,280		12,373
Other securities		0		0		480		480
Total debt securities		243,216		249,785		14,336		14,435
Marketable equity securities		20,540		20,452		0		0
Total securities	$	263,756	$	270,237	$	14,336	$	14,435

There was a combined gain of $658 thousand realized in 2009 due to sales of six securities and a loss of $4 thousand realized due to sales of two securities. There was a combined loss of $14.5 million realized in 2008 due to other than temporary impairment charges on auction rate securities and one $50 thousand loss realized on the sale of auction rate securities. There were no pre-tax gains or losses realized on sales and calls in 2007.

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $89.2 million at December 31, 2009 and $122.7 million at December 31, 2008.

The book value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $179.9 million at December 31, 2009 and $165.4 million at December 31, 2008.

CTBI evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment. The analysis performed as of December 31, 2009 indicates that all impairment is considered temporary, market driven, and not credit-related. The percentage of total investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2009 was 8.5% compared to 52.0% as of December 31, 2008. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2009 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	14,992	$	(283	)	$	14,709
States and political subdivision		2,567		(55	)		2,512
U.S. government sponsored agencies		5,013		(83	)		4,930
Total debt securities		22,572		(421	)		22,151
Marketable equity securities		540		(185	)		355
Total securities		23,112		(606	)		22,506

12 Months or More
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		0		0			0
States and political subdivision		1,601		(39	)		1,562
U.S. government sponsored agencies		0		0			0
Total debt securities		1,601		(39	)		1,562
Marketable equity securities		0		0			0
Total securities		1,601		(39	)		1,562

Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		14,992		(283	)		14,709
States and political subdivision		4,168		(94	)		4,074
U.S. government sponsored agencies		5,013		(83	)		4,930
Total debt securities		24,173		(460	)		23,713
Marketable equity securities		540		(185	)		355
Total securities	$	24,713	$	(645	)	$	24,068

As of December 31, 2009, there were no held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses.

The analysis performed as of December 31, 2008 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, due to fluctuations in interest rates, and not credit-related. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2008.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
State and political subdivisions	$	8,929	$	(453	)	$	8,476
U.S. government sponsored agencies		76,984		(321	)		76,663
Total debt securities		85,913		(774	)		85,139
Marketable equity securities		20,000		(220	)		19,780
Total securities		105,913		(994	)		104,919

12 Months or More
State and political subdivisions		1,385		(198	)		1,187
U.S. government sponsored agencies		22,299		(69	)		22,230
Total debt securities		23,684		(267	)		23,417
Marketable equity securities		0		0			0
Total securities		23,684		(267	)		23,417

Total
State and political subdivisions		10,314		(651	)		9,663
U.S. government sponsored agencies		99,283		(390	)		98,893
Total debt securities		109,597		(1,041	)		108,556
Marketable equity securities		20,000		(220	)		19,780
Total securities	$	129,597	$	(1,261	)	$	128,336

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
State and political subdivisions	$	0	$	0		$	0
U.S. government sponsored agencies		24,021		(110	)		23,911
Total securities	$	24,021	$	(110	)	$	23,911

4. Loans

Major classifications of loans, net of unearned income and deferred loan origination costs and fees, are summarized as follows:

(in thousands) December 31	2009		2008
Commercial construction	$	141,440	$	156,425
Commercial secured by real estate		707,500		663,663
Commercial other		373,829		365,685
Real estate construction		51,311		56,298
Real estate mortgage		610,727		609,394
Consumer		530,905		484,843
Equipment lease financing		20,048		12,343
	$	2,435,760	$	2,348,651

Not included in the loan balances above were loans held for sale in the amount of $1.8 million and $0.6 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount of capitalized fees and costs under ASC 310, formerly SFAS 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases, included in the above loan totals were $0.6 million and $1.4 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The amount of loans on a non-accruing income status was $32.2 million, $40.9 million, and $22.2 million at December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. The total of loans on nonaccrual that were in homogeneous pools and not evaluated individually for impairment were $5.6 million, $4.3 million, and $3.4 million at December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Additional interest which would have been recorded during 2009, 2008, and 2007 if such loans had been accruing interest was approximately $2.3 million, $3.5 million, and $2.3 million, respectively. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest. The amount of loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest was $9.1 million, $11.2 million, and $9.6 million at December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.

At December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the recorded investment in impaired loans was $32.0 million, $36.6 million, and $13.2 million, respectively. Included in these amounts at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, were $19.2 million, $22.1 million, and $8.1 million of impaired loans for which specific reserves for loan losses were carried in the amounts of $6.6 million, $8.4 million, and $3.2 million. The average investment in impaired loans for 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $30.2 million, $37.2 million, and $13.3 million, respectively, while interest income of $0.5 million, $0.7 million, and $0.3 million was recognized on cash payments of $3.6 million, $2.7 million, and $11.0 million. Of the cash payments received in 2007, $10.2 million was related to receivable payments on one revolving line of credit that was placed on nonaccrual in 2007.

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable CTBI will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.

5. Mortgage Banking Activities

Mortgage banking activities primarily include residential mortgage originations and servicing. As discussed in note 1 above, mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are carried at fair market value with the implementation of ASC 860 in January 2007. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this statement was recognized as a $26 thousand adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in 2007. The fair value is determined quarterly based on an independent third-party valuation using a discounted cash flow analysis and calculated using a computer pricing model. The computer valuation is based on key economic assumptions including the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted-average coupon, and the weighted-average default rate, as applicable. Along with the gains received from the sale of loans, fees are received for servicing loans. These fees include late fees, which are recorded in interest income, and ancillary fees and monthly servicing fees, which are recorded in noninterest income. Costs of servicing loans are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in fair market value of the MSRs are reported as an increase or decrease to mortgage banking income.

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking income:

(in thousands) Year Ended December 31	2009			2008			2007
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale	$	4,324		$	1,583		$	1,338
Net loan servicing income (expense)
Servicing fees		1,040			888			868
Late fees		72			59			64
Ancillary fees		512			165			147
Fair value adjustments		(107	)		(1,503	)		(558	)
Net loan servicing income (expense)		1,517			(391	)		521
Mortgage banking income	$	5,841		$	1,192		$	1,859

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying balance sheets. At December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, loans serviced for the benefit of others (primarily FHLMC) totaled $431 million, $349 million, and $351 million, respectively. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments to investors, and processing foreclosures. Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with the foregoing loan servicing, and included in demand deposits, were approximately $556 thousand, $445 thousand, and $539 thousand at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights using the fair value method in 2009, 2008, and 2007 is as follows:

(in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Fair value, beginning of period	$	2,168		$	3,258		$	3,416
New servicing assets created		1,345			413			400
Time decay (1)		(136	)		(117	)		(182	)
Payoffs (2)		(579	)		(352	)		(284	)
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (3)		608			(1,034	)		(92	)
Fair value, end of period	$	3,406		$	2,168		$	3,258

(1)	Represents decrease in value due to regularly scheduled loan principal payments and partial loan paydowns.

(2)	Represents decrease in value due to loans that paid off during the period.

(3)	Represents change in value resulting from market-driven changes in interest rates.

The fair values of capitalized mortgage servicing rights were $3.4 million, $2.2 million, and $3.3 million at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Fair values for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were determined by third-party valuations using discount rates of 10.00%, 10.00%, and 10.10%, respectively, and weighted average default rates of 1.9%, 1.7%, and 1.6%, respectively. The prepayment speeds applied in 2009, 2008, and 2007 were generated by the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model. The speeds ranged from 6.08% to 22.64% in 2009, from 7.20% to 31.70% in 2008, and from 7.10% to 26.40% in 2007 depending on the stratifications of the specific rights. MSR values are very sensitive to movement in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected balance of the underlying loans, which can be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. CTBI does not currently hedge against changes in the fair value of its MSR portfolio.

6. Related Party Transactions

In the ordinary course of business, our banking subsidiary has made extensions of credit and had transactions with certain directors and executive officers of CTBI or our subsidiaries, including their associates (as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission). We believe such extensions of credit and transactions were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with other persons.

Activity for related party transactions during 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

(in thousands)	2009			2008
Related party extensions of credit, beginning of period	$	20,789		$	20,185
New loans		4,706			7,963
Repayments		(1,188	)		(7,359	)
Increase (Decrease) due to changes in directorship		(5,914	)		0
Related party extensions of credit, end of period	$	18,393		$	20,789

The aggregate balances of related party deposits at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $25.9 million and $19.4 million, respectively.

7. Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

Activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses was as follows:

(in thousands)	2009			2008
Balance, beginning of year	$	30,821		$	28,054
Provision charged to operations		17,468			11,452
Recoveries		3,213			2,613
Charge-offs		(18,859	)		(11,298	)
Balance, end of year	$	32,643		$	30,821

8. Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

(in thousands) December 31	2009			2008
Land and buildings	$	67,785		$	66,119
Leasehold improvements		5,114			5,601
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		42,320			41,630
Construction in progress		50			817
		115,269			114,167
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(66,027	)		(62,577	)
	$	49,242		$	51,590

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment for 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $4.6 million, $4.5 million, and $5.0 million, respectively.

9. Other Real Estate Owned

Activity for foreclosed properties was as follows:

(in thousands)	2009			2008
Beginning balance	$	10,425		$	7,851
New assets acquired		33,301			7,718
Capitalized costs		1,908			142
Fair value adjustments		(1,350	)		(245	)
Sale of assets		(6,951	)		(5,041	)
Ending balance	$	37,333		$	10,425

Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties were $3.3 million, $0.7 million, and $0.8 million for 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. See note 1 for a description of our accounting policies relative to foreclosed properties.

10. Deposits

Major classifications of deposits are categorized as follows:

(in thousands) December 31	2009		2008
Noninterest bearing deposits	$	490,809	$	450,360
NOW accounts		17,389		21,739
Money market deposits		422,458		412,866
Savings		215,792		202,175
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 or more		555,810		502,221
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits less than $100,000		759,951		742,473
	$	2,462,209	$	2,331,834

Interest expense on deposits is categorized as follows:

(in thousands)	2009		2008		2007
Savings, NOW, and money market accounts	$	4,002	$	7,885	$	17,457
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 or more		15,059		18,715		23,172
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits less than $100,000		20,732		27,249		35,008
	$	39,793	$	53,849	$	75,637

Maturities of certificates of deposits and other time deposits are presented below:

	Maturities by Period at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)	Total		Within 1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		5 Years		After 5 Years
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 or more	$	555,810	$	523,916	$	27,183	$	1,768	$	1,505	$	1,243	$	195
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits less than $100,000		759,951		706,032		33,961		11,212		4,165		3,498		1,083
	$	1,315,761	$	1,229,948	$	61,144	$	12,980	$	5,670	$	4,741	$	1,278

11. Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances consisted of the following monthly amortizing and term borrowings at December 31:

(in thousands)	2009		2008
Monthly amortizing	$	671	$	727
Term		20,000		60,000
	$	20,671	$	60,727

The advances from the FHLB that require monthly principal payments were due for repayment as follows:

	Principal Payments Due by Period at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)	Total		Within 1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		5 Years		After 5 Years
Outstanding advances, weighted average interest rate – 3.76%	$	671	$	617	$	8	$	8	$	8	$	8	$	22

	Principal Payments Due by Period at December 31, 2008
(in thousands)	Total		Within 1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		5 Years		After 5 Years
Outstanding advances, weighted average interest rate – 3.76%	$	727	$	56	$	617	$	8	$	8	$	8	$	30

The term advances that require the total payment to be made at maturity follow:

(in thousands) December 31	2009		2008
Advance #154, 3.17%, due 8/04/09	$	0	$	20,000
Advance #155, 3.18%, due 9/02/09		0		40,000
Advance #156, 0.43%, due 1/29/10		20,000		0
	$	20,000	$	60,000

Advances totaling $20.7 million at December 31, 2009 were collateralized by FHLB stock of $24.7 million and a blanket lien on qualifying first mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2009, CTBI had a $411.3 million FHLB borrowing capacity with $20.7 million in advances and $95.8 million in letters of credit leaving $294.8 million available for additional advances. The advances had fixed interest rates ranging from 0.43% to 4.00% with a weighted average rate of 0.54%. The advances are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment.

12. Borrowings

Short-term debt is categorized as follows:

(in thousands) December 31	2009		2008
Subsidiaries:
Repurchase agreements	$	180,471	$	157,422
Federal funds purchased		12,205		11,492
	$	192,676	$	168,914

On October 28, 2009, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. entered into a revolving credit promissory note for a line of credit in the amount of $12 million at a floating interest rate of 2.25% in excess of the one-month LIBOR Rate. An unused commitment fee of 0.15% has been established. Currently, all $12 million remain available for general corporate purposes. The agreement, which was effective October 29, 2009, replaced the agreement dated July 29, 2008, and will mature on October 28, 2010.

All federal funds purchased and the majority of repurchase agreements mature and reprice daily. The average rates paid for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements on December 31, 2009 were 0.15% and 1.25%, respectively.

The maximum balance for repurchase agreements at any month-end during 2009 occurred at November 30, 2009, with a month-end balance of $185.9 million. The average balance of repurchase agreements for the year was $160.8 million.

Long-term debt is categorized as follows:

(in thousands) December 31	2009		2008
Parent:
Junior subordinated debentures, 6.52%, due 6/1/37	$	61,341	$	61,341

On March 31, 2007, CTBI issued $61.3 million in junior subordinated debentures to a newly formed unconsolidated Delaware statutory trust subsidiary which in turn issued $59.5 million of capital securities in a private placement to institutional investors. The debentures, which mature in 30 years but are redeemable at par at CTBI's option after five years, were issued at a rate of 6.52% until June 1, 2012, and thereafter at a floating rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 1.59%. The underlying capital securities were issued at the equivalent rates and terms. The proceeds of the debentures were used to fund the redemption on April 2, 2007 of all CTBI's outstanding 9.0% and 8.25% junior subordinated debentures in the total amount of $61.3 million.

13. Income Taxes

The components of the provision for income taxes, exclusive of tax effect of unrealized securities gains, are as follows:

(in thousands)	2009		2008			2007
Current income taxes	$	7,684	$	14,121		$	15,463
Deferred income taxes		2,918		(5,774	)		955
	$	10,602	$	8,347		$	16,418

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to our actual income tax expense is shown below:

(in thousands)	2009					2008					2007
Computed at the statutory rate	$	12,577		35.41	%	$	10,898		34.52	%	$	18,822		35.75	%
Increase (decrease) resulting from
Tax-exempt interest		(739	)	(2.08	)		(771	)	(2.44	)		(818	)	(1.55	)
Housing and new markets credits		(654	)	(1.84	)		(532	)	(1.68	)		(448	)	(0.85	)
Dividends received deduction		(188	)	(0.53	)		(422	)	(1.34	)		(1,310	)	(2.49	)
Bank owned life insurance		(342	)	(0.96	)		(277	)	(0.88	)		(339	)	(0.64	)
Other, net		(52	)	(0.15	)		(549	)	(1.74	)		511		0.96
Total	$	10,602		29.85	%	$	8,347		26.44	%	$	16,418		31.18	%

The components of the net deferred tax liability as of December 31 are as follows:

(in thousands)	2009			2008
Deferred tax assets
Allowance for loan and lease losses	$	11,425		$	10,787
Interest on nonperforming loans		1,264			2,119
Accrued expenses		310			285
Dealer reserve valuation		1,213			950
Allowance for other real estate owned		1,213			0
Write-down of auction rate securities		3,006			5,080
Other		403			735
Total deferred tax assets		18,834			19,956

Deferred tax liabilities

Depreciation and amortization		(13,461	)		(12,438	)
FHLB stock dividends		(4,767	)		(4,767	)
Loan fee income		(1,037	)		(2,728	)
Mortgage servicing rights		(1,192	)		(759	)
Capitalized lease obligations		(2,436	)		(1,184	)
Unrealized gains on AFS securities		(2,268	)		(482	)
Other		(794	)		(460	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(25,955	)		(22,818	)

Net deferred tax liability	$	(7,121	)	$	(2,862	)

CTBI adopted the provisions of ASC 740, formerly FIN 48, on January 1, 2007. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this statement was recognized as a $0.6 million adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The ASC 740 liability is carried in other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009. CTBI is subject to taxation in the United States and various state and local jurisdictions. For federal tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2008 and 2009 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. For state and local tax purposes, CTBI’s tax years for 2004 through 2009 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. CTBI currently recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits under ASC 740 is shown below:

(in thousands)	2009			2008
Balance at January 1	$	662		$	672
Additions based on tax positions related to current year		70			83
Additions for tax positions of prior years		16			0
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(339	)		(93	)
Balance at December 31	$	409		$	662

14. Employee Benefits

On January 1, 2007, CTBI amended its KSOP Retirement Plan, creating a separate 401(k) Plan and a separate Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”).

The 401(k) Plan is available to all employees (age 21 and over) with one year of service and who work at least 1,000 hours per year. Participants in the plan have the option to contribute from 1% to 15% of their annual compensation. CTBI matches 50% of participant contributions up to 4% of gross pay. CTBI may at its discretion, contribute an additional percentage of covered employees’ compensation. CTBI’s matching contributions were $0.9 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. The 401(k) Plan owned 533,473, 504,722, and 525,938 shares of CTBI’s common stock at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Substantially all shares owned by the 401(k) were allocated to employee accounts on those dates. The market price of the shares at the date of allocation is essentially the same as the market price at the date of purchase.

The ESOP Plan has the same entrance requirements as the 401(k) Plan above. CTBI currently contributes 4% of covered employees’ gross compensation to the ESOP. The ESOP uses the contributions to acquire shares of CTBI’s common stock. CTBI’s contributions to the ESOP were $1.3 million, $1.2 million, and $1.3 million for the years ending December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The ESOP owned 623,392, 573,297, and 569,755 shares of CTBI’s common stock at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Substantially all shares owned by the ESOP were allocated to employee accounts on those dates. The market price of the shares at the date of allocation is essentially the same as the market price at the date of purchase.

Stock-Based Compensation:

We currently maintain one active and one inactive incentive stock ownership plan covering key employees. The 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors and our Shareholders in 2006. The 1998 Stock Option Plan (“1998 Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders in 1998. The 1998 Plan was rendered inactive as of April 26, 2006. As of December 31, 2009, the 1998 Plan had 1,046,831 shares authorized, 154,287 of which were transferred to the 2006 Plan. The 1989 Stock Option Plan (“1989 Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors in 1989. The 1989 Plan was inactive during 2007 and the remaining outstanding shares were exercised during 2007. The 1989 Plan is now terminated. The following table provides detail of the number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock-based awards and remaining shares available for future issuance under all of CTBI’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009:

Plan Category (shares in thousands)		Number of Shares to Be Issued Upon Exercise/Vesting	Weighted Average Price	Shares Available for Future Issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
	Stock options	595	$ 28.34	1,463 (a)
	Restricted stock	17 (c)	28.83	(a)
	Performance units	(d)	(b)	(a)
	Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”)	(e)	(b)	(a)
Total				1,463

(a)

Under the 2006 Plan, 1.5 million shares (plus any shares reserved for issuance under the 1998 Stock Option Plan) were authorized for issuance as nonqualified and incentive stock options, SARS, restricted stock and performance units. As of December 31, 2009, the above shares remained available for issuance.

(b)	Not applicable

(c)	The maximum number of shares of Restricted Stock that may be granted to a participant during any calendar year is 40,000 shares.

(d)	No performance units have been issued. The maximum payment that can be made pursuant to Performance Units granted to any one Participant in any calendar year shall be $250,000.

(e)	No SARS have been issued. The maximum number of shares with respect to which SARs may be granted to a Participant during any calendar year shall be 100,000 shares.

The following table details the shares available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan at December 31, 2009.

Plan Category (shares in thousands)	Shares Available for Future Issuance
Shares available at January 1, 2009		1,477,533
1998 Plan forfeitures in 2009		0
2006 Plan stock option issuances in 2009		(9,000	)
2006 Plan restricted stock issuances in 2009		(5,710	)
2006 Plan forfeitures in 2009		0
Shares available for future issuance		1,462,823

CTBI uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, which are evaluated and revised as necessary, in estimating the grant-date fair value of each option grant for the year end:

	2009			2008			2007
Expected option life (in years)		7.5			7.5			7.5
Expected volatility		0.371			0.310			0.335
Expected Dividend yield		4.02	%		4.10	%		2.77	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.23	%		3.23	%		4.81	%

The expected option life is derived from the “safe-harbor” rules for estimating option life in ASC 718, formerly FAS 123(R). The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the stock using a historical look back that approximates the expected life of the option grant. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. CTBI’s stock-based compensation expense for the years 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $0.6 million, $0.7 million, and $0.6 million, respectively.

CTBI’s stock option activity for the 2006 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is summarized as follows:

December 31	2009				2008					2007
	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		165,678	$	35.12		107,595		$	38.95		0		$	--
Granted		9,000		29.82		63,700			28.32		113,998			38.95
Exercised		0		--		0			--		0			--
Forfeited/expired		0		--		(5,617	)		31.38		(6,403	)		38.95
Outstanding at end of year		174,678	$	34.85		165,678		$	35.12		107,595		$	38.95

Exercisable at end of year		55,717	$	38.43		26,488		$	38.95		0		$	--

A summary of the status of CTBI’s 2006 Plan for nonvested shares as of December 31, 2009, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2009, is presented as follows:

Nonvested Shares	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2009		139,190		$	10.02
Granted		9,000			7.69
Vested		(29,229	)		12.11
Forfeited		0			--
Nonvested at December 31, 2009		118,961		$	9.33

The 2006 Plan had options with the following remaining lives at December 31, 2009:

2006 Option Plan
Remaining Life	Outstanding Options		Weighted Average Price
Seven years		105,978	$	38.95
Eight years		59,700		28.32
Nine years		9,000		29.82
Total outstanding		174,678
Weighted average price			$	34.85

The weighted-average fair value of options granted from the 2006 Plan during the years 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $0.1 million or $7.69 per share, $0.4 million or $6.41 per share, and $1.5 million or $12.74 per share, respectively.

The following table shows the intrinsic values of options exercised, exercisable, and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 in the 2006 Plan:

(in thousands)	2009		2008		2007
Options exercised	$	0	$	0	$	0
Options exercisable		693		337		0
Outstanding options		1,802		1,733		1,371

The following table shows restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. No restricted stock grants were made in the year 2007.

(in thousands)	2009				2008
	Grants		Weighted Average Fair Value		Grants		Weighted Average Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year		11,076	$	28.32		0	$	--
Granted		5,710		29.82		11,076		28.32
Vested		0		--		0		--
Forfeited		0		--		0		--
Outstanding at end of year		16,786	$	28.83		11,076	$	28.32

CTBI’s stock option activity for the 1998 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is summarized as follows:

December 31	2009					2008					2007
	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		500,454		$	23.91		581,413		$	23.52		632,864		$	23.44
Granted		0			--		0			--		0			--
Exercised		(79,723	)		14.75		(77,983	)		20.79		(45,717	)		21.37
Forfeited/expired		0			--		(2,976	)		31.54		(5,734	)		30.38
Outstanding at end of year		420,731		$	25.64		500,454		$	23.91		581,413		$	23.52

Exercisable at end of year		386,498		$	25.03		350,113		$	21.24		380,409		$	19.85

The 1998 Plan had options with the following remaining lives at December 31, 2009:

1998 Option Plan
Remaining Life	Outstanding Options		Weighted Average Price
One year		4,326		13.23
Two years		28,284		11.83
Three years		96,937		19.15
Four years		39,888		20.99
Five years		70,950		27.82
Six years		79,112		30.88
Seven years		101,234		32.44
Total outstanding		420,731
Weighted average price			$	25.64

The following table shows the intrinsic values of options exercised, exercisable, and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:

(in thousands)	2009		2008		2007
Options exercised	$	186	$	339	$	223
Options exercisable		2,399		1,641		1,580
Outstanding options		2,759		2,945		3,312

A summary of the status of CTBI’s 1998 Plan nonvested shares as of December 31, 2009 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2009 is presented below:

Nonvested Shares	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2009		150,341	$	8.68
Granted		0		--
Vested		116,108		8.14
Forfeited		0		--
Nonvested at December 31, 2009		34,233	$	10.51

The 1989 Plan terminated during 2007 and has no remaining options available for grant.CTBI’s stock option activity for the 1989 Plan for the year ended December 31, 2007 is summarized as follows:

December 31	2007
	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		4,832		$	19.33
Exercised		(4,832	)		19.33
Forfeited/expired		0			--
Outstanding at end of year		0		$	--

Exercisable at end of year		0		$	--

The following table shows the intrinsic values of options exercised, exercisable, and outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2007 in the 1989 Plan:

(in thousands)	2007
Options exercised	$	100
Options exercisable		0
Outstanding options		0

As of December 31, 2009, there was $0.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, was $1.1 million and $1.3 million. The total grant-date fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, was $1.3 million, $0.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $1.2 million, $1.6 million, and $1.1 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercises of the share-based payment arrangements totaled $0.3 million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.

15. Operating Leases

Certain premises and equipment are leased under operating leases. Additionally, certain premises are leased or subleased to third parties. Minimum non-cancellable rental payments and rental receipts are as follows:

(in thousands)	Payments		Receipts
2010	$	1,570	$	604
2011		1,404		435
2012		1,250		240
2013		1,046		35
2014		649		14
Thereafter		3,969		3
	$	9,888	$	1,331

Rental expense net of rental income under operating leases was $0.7 million for each of the years 2009, 2008, and 2007.

16. Fair Market Value of Financial Instruments

Effective January 1, 2008, CTBI adopted ASC 820, formerly FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. In this standard, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted process in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

The application of ASC 820 in situations where the market for a financial asset is not active was clarified in October 2008 by the issuance of ASC 820-10-35, formerly FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. This clarification was effective for financial statements issued as of September 30, 2008 and thereafter and did not have a material impact on the methods by which CTBI determines the fair values of its financial assets. ASC 820 was also clarified in April 2009 effective for the second quarter 2009 by ASC-10-65, formerly FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. This section clarifies factors that determine whether transactions are orderly or not in evaluating the reliability of market transactions for fair value estimates. ASC 820-10-15, formerly FSP FAS 157-2, deferred the application of ASC 820 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. CTBI adopted the provisions of this standard with respect to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities beginning on January 1, 2009.

Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present information about CTBI’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by CTBI to determine such fair value.

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using
	Fair Value December 31 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	16,731	$	0	$	16,731	$	0
State and political subdivisions		45,657		0		45,657		0
U.S. government sponsored agencies		187,397		0		187,397		0
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Marketable equity securities		20,452		0		20,241		211
Mortgage servicing rights		3,406		0		0		3,406
Total recurring assets measured at fair value	$	273,643	$	0	$	270,026	$	3,617

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
	Fair Value December 31 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	18,906	$	0	$	18,906	$	0
State and political subdivisions		39,844		0		39,844		0
U.S. government sponsored agencies		188,305		0		188,305		0
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1		0		1		0
Marketable equity securities		20,320		0		19,780		540
Mortgage servicing rights		2,168		0		0		2,168
Total recurring assets measured at fair value	$	269,544	$	0	$	266,836	$	2,708

Mortgage servicing rights – Level 3 Inputs. CTBI records MSRs at fair value on a recurring basis with subsequent remeasurement of MSRs based on change in fair value. In determining fair value, CTBI utilizes the expertise of an independent third party. An estimate of the fair value of CTBI’s MSRs is determined by the independent third party utilizing assumptions about factors such as mortgage interest rates, discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry demand. All of CTBI’s MSRs are classified as Level 3.

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs:

Marketable Equity Securities (in thousands)	2009			2008
Beginning balance, January 1	$	540		$	40,050
Total realized and unrealized gains and losses
Included in net income		0			(14,514	)
Transfer of securities from Level 3 to Level 2		0			0
Purchases, issuances, and settlements		(329	)		(24,996	)
Ending balance, December 31	$	211		$	540

Mortgage Servicing Rights (in thousands)	2009		2008
Beginning balance, January 1	$	2,168	$	3,258
Total realized and unrealized gains and losses
Included in net income		608		(1,034	)
Purchases, issuances, and settlements		630		(56	)
Ending balance, December 31	$	3,406	$	2,168

Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized below:

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009 Using
	Fair Value December 31 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	8,387	$	0	$	0	$	8,387
Other real estate/assets owned		8,331		0		0		8,331

(in thousands)			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
	Fair Value December 31 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	10,285	$	0	$	0	$	10,285

Impaired loans (collateral dependent) – Level 3 Inputs. Loans considered impaired under ASC 310, formerly FAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by FAS 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — Income Recognition and Disclosure, are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect (1) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value. Year-to-date losses on impaired loans were $5.6 million and $6.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Other real estate/assets owned – Level 3 Inputs. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 360, formerly FAS 144, long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying amount of $8.3 million were written down to their fair value less costs to sell during the year. Long-lived assets are nonfinancial assets subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral. Losses on other real estate/assets owned were $1.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

(in thousands) December 31	2009				2008
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	142,129	$	142,129	$	140,878	$	140,878
Other investments		100		100		100		100
Securities available-for-sale		270,237		270,237		267,376		267,376
Securities held-to-maturity		14,336		14,435		25,597		25,496
Loans, net (including impaired loans)		2,403,117		2,407,703		2,317,830		2,320,600
Loans held for sale		1,818		1,845		623		638
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,348		4,348		4,340		4,340
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		24,700		24,700		24,700		24,700
Accrued interest receivable		11,936		11,936		12,926		12,926
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights		3,406		3,406		2,168		2,168
	$	2,876,127	$	2,880,839	$	2,796,538	$	2,799,222

Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	2,462,209	$	2,462,676	$	2,331,834	$	2,342,136
Repurchase agreements		180,471		180,776		157,422		157,374
Federal funds purchased		12,205		12,205		11,492		11,492
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		20,671		20,670		60,727		61,245
Long-term debt		61,341		29,522		61,341		29,424
Accrued interest payable		3,686		3,686		5,570		5,570
	$	2,740,583	$	2,709,535	$	2,628,386	$	2,607,241

Unrecognized financial instruments
Letters of credit	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		0		0		0		0
	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Other Investments – Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.

Securities – Fair values are based on quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted prices for similar securities.

Loans (net of the allowance for loan and lease losses and including impaired loans) – The fair value of fixed rate loans and variable rate mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. For other variable rate loans, the carrying amount approximates fair value.

Loans Held for Sale – The fair value is predetermined at origination based on sale price.

Federal Reserve Bank Stock – The carrying value of Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Reserve Bank.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock – The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Accrued Interest Receivable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Deposits – The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. For deposits including demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts, and certain money market accounts, the carrying value approximates fair value.

Repurchase Agreements – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

Federal Funds Purchased – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank – The fair value of these fixed-maturity advances is estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.

Long-term Debt – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

Accrued Interest Payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Other Financial Instruments – The estimated fair value for other financial instruments and off-balance sheet loan commitments approximates cost at December 31, 2009 and 2008. Off-balance sheet loan commitments at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $425.1 million and $481.8 million, respectively.

Letters of Credit – The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. The fair value of such letters of credit is not material.

Commitments to Extend Credit – The fair value of commitments to extend credit is based upon the difference between the interest rate at which we are committed to make the loans and the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities, adjusted for the estimated volume of loan commitments actually expected to close. The fair value of such commitments is not material.

17. Off-Balance Sheet Transactions and Guarantees

The Bank is a party to transactions with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit in the form of unused lines of credit. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

At December 31, the Bank had the following off-balance sheet financial instruments, whose approximate contract amounts represent additional credit risk to CTBI:

(in thousands)	2009		2008
Standby letters of credit	$	58,641	$	57,493
Commitments to extend credit		366,461		424,258
Total	$	425,102	$	481,751

Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments to guarantee the performance of a third party. The credit risk involved is essentially the same as the risk involved in making loans. At December 31, 2009, we maintained a credit loss reserve of approximately $7 thousand relating to these financial standby letters of credit. The reserve coverage calculation was determined using essentially the same methodology as used for the allowance for loan and lease losses. Approximately 92% of the total standby letters of credit are secured, with $47.0 million of the total $58.6 million secured by cash. Collateral for the remaining secured standby letters of credit varies but is comprised primarily of accounts receivable, inventory, property, equipment, and income-producing properties.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of the contract. At December 31, 2009, a credit loss reserve of $218 thousand was maintained relating to these commitments. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. A portion of the commitments is to extend credit at fixed rates. Fixed rate loan commitments at December 31, 2009 of $16.9 million had interest rates and terms ranging predominantly from 5.00% to 6.99% and 6 months to 2 years, respectively. These credit commitments were based on prevailing rates, terms, and conditions applicable to other loans being made at December 31, 2009.

18. Concentrations of Credit Risk

CTBI’s banking subsidiary grants commercial, residential, and consumer loans to customers primarily located in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, northeastern Tennessee and southern West Virginia. The Bank is continuing to manage all components of its portfolio mix in a manner to reduce risk from changes in economic conditions. Concentrations of credit, as defined for regulatory purposes, are reviewed quarterly by management to ensure that internally established limits based on Tier 1 Capital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses are not exceeded. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, our concentrations of hotel/motel industry credits were 42% and 39% of Tier 1 Capital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses, respectively. Coal mining and related support industries credits were 31% and 32%, respectively. Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings credits were 29% and 31%, respectively. These percentages are within our internally established limits regarding concentrations of credit.

19. Commitments and Contingencies

CTBI and our subsidiaries, and from time to time, our officers, are named defendants in legal actions arising from ordinary business activities. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, believes any pending actions are without merit or that the ultimate liability, if any, will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

20. Regulatory Matters

Our principal source of funds is dividends received from our subsidiary bank. Regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by our banking subsidiary without prior approval. During 2010, approximately $12.6 million plus any 2010 net profits can be paid by our banking subsidiary without prior regulatory approval.

The Federal Reserve Bank adopted quantitative measures which assign risk weightings to assets and off-balance sheet items and also define and set minimum regulatory capital requirements (risk based capital ratios). All banks are required to have a minimum Tier 1 (core capital) leverage ratio of 4% of adjusted quarterly average assets, Tier 1 capital of at least 4% of risk-weighted assets, and total capital of at least 8% of risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital consists principally of shareholders’ equity including capital-qualifying subordinated debt but excluding unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, less goodwill and certain other intangibles. Total capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus certain debt instruments and the reserve for credit losses, subject to limitation. Failure to meet certain capital requirements can initiate certain actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our consolidated financial statements. The regulations also define well-capitalized levels of Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1, and total capital as 5%, 6%, and 10%, respectively. We had Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1, and total capital ratios above the well-capitalized levels at December 31, 2009 and 2008. We believe, as of December 31, 2009, CTBI meets all capital adequacy requirements for which it is subject to be defined as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

Under the current Federal Reserve Board’s regulatory framework, certain capital securities offered by wholly owned unconsolidated trust preferred entities of CTBI are included as Tier 1 regulatory capital. On March 1, 2005, the Federal Reserve Board adopted a final rule that allows the continued limited inclusion of trust preferred securities in the Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies (“BHCs”). Under the final rule, trust preferred securities and other restricted core capital elements are subject to stricter quantitative limits. The Board's final rule limits restricted core capital elements to 25 percent of all core capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of these limits generally may be included in Tier 2 capital. The final rule provided a five-year transition period, which ended March 31, 2009, for application of the quantitative limits. The requirement for trust preferred securities to include a call option has been eliminated, and standards for the junior subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities eligible for Tier 1 capital treatment have been clarified. The final rule addresses supervisory concerns, competitive equity considerations, and the accounting for trust preferred securities. The final rule also strengthens the definition of regulatory capital by incorporating longstanding Board policies regarding the acceptable terms of capital instruments included in banking organizations' Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital. The final rule did not have a material impact on our regulatory ratios.

Consolidated Capital Ratios

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
(in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2009:
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets)	$	310,640		10.38	%	$	119,707		4.00	%	$	149,634		5.00	%
Tier 1 capital
(to risk weighted assets)		310,640		12.90			96,322		4.00			144,484		6.00
Total capital
(to risk weighted assets)		340,717		14.15			192,632		8.00			240,789		10.00

As of December 31, 2008:
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets)	$	300,111		10.37	%	$	115,761		4.00	%	$	144,702		5.00	%
Tier 1 capital
(to risk weighted assets)		300,111		13.05			91,988		4.00			137,982		6.00
Total capital
(to risk weighted assets)		328,842		14.30			183,968		8.00			229,959		10.00

Community Trust Bank, Inc.'s Capital Ratios

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
(in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2009:
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets)	$	298,257		9.99	%	$	119,422		4.00	%	$	149,278		5.00	%
Tier 1 capital
(to risk weighted assets)		298,257		12.41			96,134		4.00			144,202		6.00
Total capital
(to risk weighted assets)		328,334		13.66			192,289		8.00			240,362		10.00

As of December 31, 2008:
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets)	$	289,221		10.02	%	$	115,457		4.00	%	$	144,322		5.00	%
Tier 1 capital
(to risk weighted assets)		289,221		12.60			91,816		4.00			137,724		6.00
Total capital
(to risk weighted assets)		317,952		13.85			183,655		8.00			229,568		10.00

21. Parent Company Financial Statements

Condensed Balance Sheets

(in thousands) December 31	2009		2008
Assets:
Cash on deposit	$	5,949	$	5,701
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries		374,169		360,974
Goodwill		4,973		4,973
Premises and equipment, net		34		0
Other assets		2,688		256
Total assets	$	387,813	$	371,904

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Long-term debt	$	61,341	$	61,341
Other liabilities		5,015		2,357
Total liabilities		66,356		63,698

Shareholders’ equity		321,457		308,206

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	387,813	$	371,904

Condensed Statements of Income

(in thousands) Year Ended December 31	2009			2008			2007
Income:
Dividends from subsidiary banks	$	18,620		$	20,620		$	23,380
Other income		24			41			1,207
Total income		18,644			20,661			24,587

Expenses:
Interest expense		3,999			4,000			4,364
Depreciation expense		12			0			0
Other expenses		1,190			1,084			3,163
Total expenses		5,201			5,084			7,527

Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		13,443			15,577			17,060
Income tax benefit		(2,002	)		(1,725	)		(2,184	)
Income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		15,445			17,302			19,244
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries		9,614			5,771			17,383

Net income	$	25,059		$	23,073		$	36,627

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands) Year Ended December 31	2009			2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	25,059		$	23,073		$	36,627
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		12			0			0
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		(9,614	)		(5,771	)		(17,383	)
Excess tax benefit of stock-based compensation		391			330			245
Changes in:
Other assets		(2,432	)		(101	)		(118	)
Other liabilities		3,567			1,137			2,764
Net cash provided by operating activities		16,983			18,668			22,135

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of premises and equipment		(46	)		0			0
Repayment of investments in and advances to subsidiaries		(466	)		(1,158	)		(1,228	)
Redemption of investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries		0			0			1,841
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries		0			0			(1,841	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(512	)		(1,158	)		(1,228	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of purchased funds and other short-term borrowings		0			0			(9	)
Payment for redemption of junior subordinated debentures		0			0			(61,341	)
Issuance of junior subordinated debentures		0			0			61,341
Issuance of common stock		2,292			2,731			2,760
Purchase of common stock		0			(2,631	)		(6,185	)
Excess tax benefit of stock-based compensation		(391	)		(330	)		(245	)
Dividends paid		(18,124	)		(17,402	)		(16,364	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(16,223	)		(17,632	)		(20,043	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		248			(122	)		864
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		5,701			5,823			4,959
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	5,949		$	5,701		$	5,823

22. Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

Year Ended December 31	2009		2008		2007
Numerator:
Net income (in thousands)	$	25,059	$	23,073	$	36,627

Denominator:
Basic earnings per share:
Weighted average shares		15,128,777		15,016,606		15,149,641
Diluted earnings per share:
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options		40,137		143,796		222,391
Adjusted weighted average shares		15,168,914		15,160,402		15,372,032

Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share	$	1.66	$	1.54	$	2.42
Diluted earnings per share		1.65		1.52		2.38

At December 31, 2009, 425,974 stock options at a weighted average price of $32.37 were outstanding and were not used in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise price was greater than the average market value of the common stock. At December 31, 2008, 286,324 stock options at a price of $34.42 were outstanding and were not used in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise price was greater than the average market value of the common stock. At December 31, 2007, 107,595 stock options at a price of $38.95 were outstanding and were not used in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise price was greater than the average market value of the common stock.

23. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

CTBI has elected to present the disclosure required by ASC 220, formerly SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, in the consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity. The subtotal Comprehensive income represents total comprehensive income as defined in the statement. Reclassification adjustments, related tax effects allocated to changes in equity, and accumulated other comprehensive income as of and for the years ended December 31 were as follows:

(in thousands)	2009			2008			2007
Reclassification adjustment, pretax:
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) arising during year	$	5,758		$	(11,461	)	$	3,290
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income		(654	)		14,564			0
Change in unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale	$	5,104		$	3,103		$	3,290
Related tax effects:
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) arising during year	$	2,015		$	(4,011	)	$	1,152
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income		(229	)		5,097			0
Change in net deferred tax liability	$	1,786		$	1,086		$	1,152
Reclassification adjustment, net of tax:
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) arising during year	$	3,743		$	(7,450	)	$	2,138
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income		(425	)		9,467			0
Change in other comprehensive income	$	3,318		$	2,017		$	2,138

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Shareholders

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Pikeville, Kentucky

We have audited Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.’s (Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management report on internal control. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 12, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BKD, LLP

Louisville, Kentucky

March 12, 2010

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Shareholders

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Pikeville, Kentucky

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audits included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 12, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ BKD, LLP

Louisville, Kentucky

March 12, 2010

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

CTBI's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of December 31, 2009, an evaluation was carried out by CTBI’s management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President/Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009 were effective in ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this annual report on Form 10-K was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in CTBI's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, CTBI's internal control over financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL

We, as management of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“CTBI”), are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

·	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

·	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Because of the inherent limitations, any system of internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, may not prevent or detect misstatements due to the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden or that misstatements due to error or fraud may occur that are not detected. Also, projections of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures included in such controls may deteriorate.

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on the control criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2009.

The effectiveness of CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by BKD, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited the CTBI’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.


Date: March 12, 2010		/s/ Jean R. Hale
		Jean R. Hale
		Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



		/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo
		Kevin J. Stumbo
		Executive Vice President and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item other than the information set forth below is omitted because CTBI is filing a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report which includes the required information. The required information contained in CTBI’s proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Set forth below are the executive officers of CTBI at December 31, 2009, their positions with CTBI, and the year in which they first became an executive officer or director.

Name and Age (1)	Positions and Offices Currently Held	Date First Became Director or Executive Officer		Principal Occupation
Jean R. Hale; 63	Chairman, President and CEO	1992	(2)	Chairman, President and CEO of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Mark A. Gooch; 51	Executive Vice President and Secretary	1997	(3)	President and CEO of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

Tracy Little; 69	Executive Vice President	2003		President and CEO of Community Trust and Investment Company

Michael S. Wasson; 58	Executive Vice President	2000		Executive Vice President/ Central Kentucky Region President of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

James B. Draughn; 50	Executive Vice President	2001		Executive Vice President/Operations of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

Kevin J. Stumbo; 49	Executive Vice President and Treasurer	2002	(4)	Executive Vice President/ Controller of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

Ricky D. Sparkman; 47	Executive Vice President	2002		Executive Vice President/ South Central Region President of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

Richard W. Newsom; 55	Executive Vice President	2002		Executive Vice President/ Eastern Region President of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

James J. Gartner; 68	Executive Vice President	2002		Executive Vice President/ Chief Credit Officer of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

Larry W. Jones; 63	Executive Vice President	2002		Executive Vice President/ Northeastern Region President of Community Trust Bank, Inc.

Steven E. Jameson; 53	Executive Vice President	2004	(5)	Executive Vice President/ Chief Internal Audit & Risk Officer

(1)	The ages listed for CTBI's executive officers are as of February 28, 2010.

(2)	Ms. Hale assumed the position of Chairman of the Board effective December 31, 2004.

(3)	Mr. Gooch was named Secretary of CTBI effective April 26, 2005.

(4)	Mr. Stumbo served as Senior Vice President/Controller for the Bank for five years prior to being promoted to Executive Vice President/Controller. Mr. Stumbo was named Treasurer of CTBI effective April 26, 2005. Mr. Stumbo has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1985.

(5)

Mr. Jameson is a non-voting member of the Executive Committee. Mr. Jameson served as Lead Auditing Specialist for The World Bank Group in Washington, D.C. for one year prior to joining CTBI in April 2004. For the four years prior, Mr. Jameson was employed by The Institute of Internal Auditors, Inc. in Altamonte Springs, Florida as Assistant Vice President of the Professional Practices Group. Mr. Jameson's certifications include Certified Public Accountant, Certified Internal Auditor, Certified Bank Auditor, Certified Fraud Examiner, Certified Financial Services Auditor, and Certification in Control Self-Assessment.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is omitted because CTBI is filing a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report which includes the required information. The required information contained in CTBI’s proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

The information required by this item other than the information provided below is omitted because CTBI is filing a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report which includes the required information. The required information contained in CTBI’s proxy statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009, with respect to compensation plans under which common shares of CTBI are authorized for issuance to officers or employees in exchange for consideration in the form of services provided to CTBI and/or its subsidiaries. We currently maintain one active and one inactive incentive stock option plans covering key employees. The 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders in 2006. The 2006 Plan had 1,500,000 shares authorized, 1,308,536 of which were available at December 31, 2009 for future grants. In addition, any shares reserved for issuance under the 1998 Stock Option Plan (“1998 Plan”) in excess of the number of shares as to which options or other benefits are awarded thereunder, plus any shares as to which options or other benefits granted under the 1998 Plan may lapse, expire, terminate or be canceled, shall also be reserved and available for issuance or reissuance under the 2006 Plan. The 1998 Plan was approved by the Board of Directors and the Shareholders in 1998. As of December 31, 2009, the 1998 Plan had 1,046,831 shares authorized, 154,287 of which were transferred to the 2006 Plan. The total shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan as of December 31, 2009 was 1,462,823.

		A	B	C
Plan Category (shares in thousands)		Number of Common Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise/Vesting	Weighted Average Price	Number of Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in Column A)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:
	Stock options	595	$ 28.34	1,463
	Restricted stock	17	$ 28.83
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

Total		612		1,463

Additional information regarding CTBI’s stock option plans can be found in notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements.

Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibits
3.1	Articles of Incorporation and all amendments thereto {incorporated by reference to registration statement no. 33-35138}

3.2	By-laws of CTBI as amended July 25, 1995 {incorporated by reference to registration statement no. 33-61891}

3.3	By-laws of CTBI as amended January 29, 2008 {incorporated by reference to current report on Form 8-K filed January 30, 2008}

10.1	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (effective January 1, 2007) {incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 under SEC file no. 000-111-29}

10.2	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Amendment Number One effective January 1, 2002, Amendment Number Two effective January 1, 2004, Amendment Number Three effective March 28, 2005, and Amendment Number Four effective January 1, 2006) {incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 under SEC file no. 000-111-29}

10.3	Second restated Pikeville National Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan (commonly known as Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1989 Stock Option Plan) {incorporated by reference to registration statement no. 33-36165}

10.4	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan {incorporated by reference to registration statement no. 333-74217}

10.5	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan {incorporated by reference to Proxy Statement dated March 24, 2006}

10.6	Form of Severance Agreement between Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and executive officers (currently in effect with respect to eleven executive officers) {incorporated herein by reference to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 under SEC file no. 000-111-29}

10.7	Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan (2010) {incorporated herein by reference to current report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 2010}

10.8	Restricted Stock Agreement {incorporated herein by reference to current report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 2008}

21	List of subsidiaries

23.1	Consent of BKD, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer (Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and CEO)

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer (Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President and Treasurer)

32.1	Certification of Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and CEO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certification of Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b) Exhibits

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

None

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

Date: March 12, 2010	By:	/s/ Jean R. Hale
		Jean R. Hale
		Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



	By:	/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo
		Kevin J. Stumbo
		Executive Vice President and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

March 12, 2010	/s/ Jean R. Hale	Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
	Jean R. Hale

March 12, 2010	/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo	Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
	Kevin J. Stumbo

March 12, 2010	/s/ Charles J. Baird	Director
	Charles J. Baird

March 12, 2010	/s/ Nick Carter	Director
	Nick Carter

March 12, 2010	/s/ Nick A. Cooley	Director
	Nick A. Cooley

March 12, 2010	/s/ James E. McGhee, II	Director
	James E. McGhee II

March 12, 2010	/s/ M. Lynn Parrish	Director
	M. Lynn Parrish

March 12, 2010	/s/ James R. Ramsey	Director
	James R. Ramsey

COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibits
3.1	Articles of Incorporation for CTBI {incorporated herein by reference}

3.2	By-laws of CTBI as amended July 25, 1995 {incorporated herein by reference}

3.3	By-laws of CTBI as amended January 29, 2008 {incorporated herein by reference}

10.1	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (effective January 1, 2007) {incorporated herein by reference}

10.2	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Amendment Number One effective January 1, 2002, Amendment Number Two effective January 1, 2004, Amendment Number Three effective March 28, 2005, and Amendment Number Four effective January 1, 2006) {incorporated herein by reference}

10.3	Second restated Pikeville National Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan (commonly known as Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1989 Stock Option Plan) {incorporated herein by reference}

10.4	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan {incorporated herein by reference}

10.5	Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 2006 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan {incorporated herein by reference}

10.6	Form of Severance Agreement between Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. and executive officers (currently in effect with respect to eleven executive officers) {incorporated herein by reference}

10.7	Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan (2010) {incorporated herein by reference}

10.8	Restricted Stock Agreement {incorporated herein by reference}

21	List of subsidiaries

23.1	Consent of BKD, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer (Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and CEO)

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer (Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President and Treasurer)

32.1	Certification of Jean R. Hale, Chairman, President and CEO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certification of Kevin J. Stumbo, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002