COMMUNITY WEST BANCSHARES / - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
or
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from _________ to _________
Commission
File Number: 000-23575
COMMUNITY
WEST BANCSHARES
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
|
77-0446957
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
445
Pine Avenue, Goleta, California
|
93117
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(805)
692-5821
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. x
YES¨
NO
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Number
of
shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of November 13, 2007:
5,894,585 shares
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
||
3
|
|||
4
|
|||
5
|
|||
6
|
|||
7
|
|||
|
|||
The
financial statements included in this Form 10-Q should be read with
reference to Community West Bancshares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
2.
|
11
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
3.
|
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
4.
|
21
|
||
|
|||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|||
ITEM
1.
|
21
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
1A
|
21
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
2.
|
21
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
3.
|
21
|
||
ITEM
4.
|
22
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
5.
|
22
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
6.
|
22
|
||
|
|||
|
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
September
30,
2007
|
December
31,
2006
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ |
5,394
|
$ |
4,190
|
||||
Federal
funds sold
|
10,844
|
7,153
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
16,238
|
11,343
|
||||||
Time
deposits in other financial institutions
|
654
|
536
|
||||||
Investment
securities available-for-sale, at fair value; amortized cost of $20,489
at
September 30, 2007 and $22,340 at December 31, 2006
|
20,371
|
22,097
|
||||||
Investment
securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost; fair value of $16,149
at
September 30, 2007 and $10,437 at December 31, 2006
|
16,236
|
10,535
|
||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
5,123
|
4,465
|
||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank stock, at cost
|
812
|
812
|
||||||
Loans:
|
||||||||
Loans
held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value
|
96,978
|
75,795
|
||||||
Loans
held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,293
at September 30, 2007 and $3,926 at December 31, 2006
|
408,237
|
375,777
|
||||||
Total
loans
|
505,215
|
451,572
|
||||||
Servicing
rights
|
1,383
|
1,968
|
||||||
Other
assets acquired through foreclosure, net
|
558
|
582
|
||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
3,114
|
2,802
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
11,281
|
9,903
|
||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ |
580,985
|
$ |
516,615
|
||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
demand
|
$ |
33,602
|
$ |
33,033
|
||||
Interest-bearing
demand
|
78,763
|
49,975
|
||||||
Savings
|
15,395
|
14,522
|
||||||
Time
certificates
|
287,848
|
271,217
|
||||||
Total
deposits
|
415,608
|
368,747
|
||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances
|
109,000
|
95,000
|
||||||
Other
liabilities
|
6,899
|
6,048
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
531,507
|
469,795
|
||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding: 5,881,085 at September 30, 2007
and
5,814,568 at December 31, 2006
|
31,391
|
30,794
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
18,157
|
16,169
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net
|
(70 | ) | (143 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
49,478
|
46,820
|
||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$ |
580,985
|
$ |
516,615
|
See
accompanying notes.
CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
INTEREST
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ |
11,341
|
$ |
9,729
|
$ |
32,706
|
$ |
27,144
|
||||||||
Investment
securities
|
504
|
414
|
1,407
|
1,143
|
||||||||||||
Other
|
185
|
133
|
589
|
415
|
||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
12,030
|
10,276
|
34,702
|
28,702
|
||||||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
4,631
|
3,517
|
13,174
|
9,470
|
||||||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
1,246
|
972
|
3,636
|
2,443
|
||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
5,877
|
4,489
|
16,810
|
11,913
|
||||||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME
|
6,153
|
5,787
|
17,892
|
16,789
|
||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
547
|
12
|
769
|
337
|
||||||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR
LOAN LOSSES
|
5,606
|
5,775
|
17,123
|
16,452
|
||||||||||||
NON-INTEREST
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Gains
from loan sales, net
|
361
|
318
|
693
|
1,144
|
||||||||||||
Other
loan fees
|
587
|
703
|
2,132
|
1,959
|
||||||||||||
Other
|
264
|
432
|
964
|
1,256
|
||||||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
1,212
|
1,453
|
3,789
|
4,359
|
||||||||||||
NON-INTEREST
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,383
|
3,275
|
10,626
|
9,699
|
||||||||||||
Occupancy
and equipment expenses
|
682
|
573
|
1,907
|
1,724
|
||||||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
1,089
|
846
|
3,123
|
2,468
|
||||||||||||
Total
non-interest expenses
|
5,154
|
4,694
|
15,656
|
13,891
|
||||||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
1,664
|
2,534
|
5,256
|
6,920
|
||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
701
|
1,043
|
2,215
|
2,881
|
||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ |
963
|
$ |
1,491
|
$ |
3,041
|
$ |
4,039
|
||||||||
INCOME
PER SHARE – BASIC
|
$ |
.16
|
$ |
.26
|
$ |
.52
|
$ |
.70
|
||||||||
INCOME
PER SHARE – DILUTED
|
$ |
.16
|
$ |
.25
|
$ |
.50
|
$ |
.67
|
||||||||
Basic
weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
5,877
|
5,787
|
5,852
|
5,778
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
6,009
|
6,008
|
6,027
|
5,995
|
See
accompanying notes.
Common
Stock
|
Retained
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
|
Total
Stockholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Earnings
|
Income
(Loss)
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES
AT
|
||||||||||||||||||||
JANUARY
1, 2007
|
5,815
|
$ |
30,794
|
$ |
16,169
|
$ | (143 | ) | $ |
46,820
|
||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
66
|
412
|
412
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
125
|
125
|
||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit from stock options
|
60
|
60
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
3,041
|
3,041
|
||||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net
|
73
|
73
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
3,114
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
||||||||||||||||||||
($0.18
per share)
|
(1,053 | ) | (1,053 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCES
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
|
5,881
|
$ |
31,391
|
$ |
18,157
|
$ | (70 | ) | $ |
49,478
|
See
accompanying notes.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
3,041
|
$ |
4,039
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
769
|
337
|
||||||
Write-down
of other assets acquired through foreclosure
|
54
|
-
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
370
|
368
|
||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
125
|
120
|
||||||
Net
amortization of discounts and premiums for investment
securities
|
(10 | ) |
1
|
|||||
Loss
(gain) on:
|
||||||||
Sale
of other assets acquired through foreclosure
|
13
|
19
|
||||||
Sale
of loans held for sale
|
(693 | ) | (1,144 | ) | ||||
Loans
originated for sale, net
|
1,729
|
1,404
|
||||||
Changes
in:
|
||||||||
Servicing
rights, net of amortization and valuation adjustments
|
585
|
674
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
(1,502 | ) | (209 | ) | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
984
|
1,296
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
5,465
|
6,905
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of held-to-maturity securities
|
(7,881 | ) | (2,479 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of available-for-sale securities
|
-
|
(3,976 | ) | |||||
Purchase
of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
(481 | ) | (900 | ) | ||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock dividend
|
(177 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||
Principal
pay downs and maturities of held-to-maturity securities
|
2,185
|
1,626
|
||||||
Principal
pay downs and maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
1,855
|
3,674
|
||||||
Loan
originations and principal collections, net
|
(55,499 | ) | (46,327 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of other assets acquired through foreclosure
|
7
|
104
|
||||||
Net
increase in time deposits in other financial institutions
|
(118 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of premises and equipment, net
|
(681 | ) | (498 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(60,790 | ) | (48,984 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
412
|
271
|
||||||
Cash
dividends paid on common stock
|
(1,053 | ) | (982 | ) | ||||
Net
increase (decrease) in demand deposits and savings
accounts
|
30,230
|
(15,158 | ) | |||||
Net
increase in time certificates of deposit
|
16,631
|
42,689
|
||||||
Proceeds
from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
45,000
|
29,500
|
||||||
Repayment
of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
(31,000 | ) | (8,000 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
60,220
|
48,320
|
||||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
4,895
|
6,241
|
||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
11,343
|
13,732
|
||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$ |
16,238
|
$ |
19,973
|
||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ |
14,844
|
$ |
10,740
|
||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
3,203
|
3,082
|
||||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Noncash Investing Activity:
|
||||||||
Transfers
to other assets acquired through foreclosure
|
51
|
116
|
See
accompanying notes.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and
reclassifications that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the
fair
presentation of the results of operations and financial condition for the
interim period. The unaudited consolidated financial statements include
Community West Bancshares (“CWBC") and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Community
West Bank, N.A. ("CWB" or the “Bank”). CWBC and CWB are referred to
herein as “the Company”. The accompanying unaudited condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they
do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement
have been reflected in the financial statements. However, the results of
operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year.
These
unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Community West
Bancshares included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
1.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Provision
and Allowance for Loan Losses – The Company
maintains a detailed, systematic analysis and procedural discipline to determine
the amount of the allowance for loan losses (“ALL”). The ALL is based
on estimates and is intended to be adequate to provide for probable losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. This process involves deriving
probable loss estimates that are based on individual loan loss estimation,
migration analysis/historical loss rates and management’s judgment.
The
Company employs several methodologies for estimating probable
losses. Methodologies are determined based on a number of factors,
including type of asset, risk rating, concentrations, collateral value and
the
input of the Special Assets group, functioning as a workout unit.
The
ALL
calculation for the different major loan types is as follows:
|
·
|
SBA
– All loans are reviewed and classified loans are assigned a specific
allowance. Those not classified are assigned a pass
rating. A migration analysis and various portfolio specific
factors are used to calculate the required allowance on those pass
loans.
|
|
·
|
Relationship
Banking – Includes commercial, commercial real estate and consumer
loans. Classified loans are assigned a specific
allowance. A migration analysis and various portfolio specific
factors are used to calculate the required allowance on the remaining
pass
loans.
|
|
·
|
Manufactured
Housing – An allowance is calculated on the basis of historical loss
experience, risk rating, which is a combination of delinquency, value
of
collateral on classified loans and perceived risk in the product
line.
|
|
·
|
Securitized
Loans – The Company considers this a homogeneous portfolio and calculates
the allowance based on statistical information provided by the
servicer. Charge-off history is calculated based on two
methodologies; a 12-month historical trend analysis and by delinquency
information. The highest requirement of the two methods is
used.
|
The
Company calculates the required ALL on a monthly basis. Any
difference between estimated and actual observed losses from the prior month
are
reflected in the current period required ALL calculation and adjusted as deemed
necessary. The review of the adequacy of the allowance takes into
consideration such factors as concentrations of credit, changes in the growth,
size and composition of the loan portfolio, overall and individual portfolio
quality, review of specific problem loans, collateral, guarantees and economic
conditions that may affect the borrowers' ability to pay and/or the value of
the
underlying collateral. Additional factors considered include:
geographic location of borrowers, changes in the Company’s product-specific
credit policy and lending staff experience. These estimates depend on
the outcome of future events and, therefore, contain inherent
uncertainties.
The
Company's ALL is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb
known and inherent probable losses on existing loans. A provision for
loan losses is charged to expense. The allowance is charged for
losses when management believes that full recovery on the loan is
unlikely. Generally, the Company charges off any loan classified as a
"loss" portions of loans which are deemed to be uncollectible; overdrafts
which
have been outstanding for more than 30 days; and, all other unsecured loans
past
due 120 or more days. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to
the ALL.
Servicing
Rights – The guaranteed portion of
certain SBA loans can be sold into the secondary market. Servicing
rights are recognized as separate assets when loans are sold with servicing
retained. Servicing rights are amortized in proportion to, and over
the period of, estimated future net servicing income. The Company
uses industry prepayment statistics and its own prepayment experience in
estimating the expected life of the loans. Management periodically
evaluates servicing rights for impairment. Servicing rights are
evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared
to
amortized cost on a loan-by-loan basis. Fair value is determined
using discounted future cash flows calculated on a loan-by-loan basis and
aggregated to the total asset level. The initial servicing rights and
resulting gain on sale are calculated based on the difference between the best
actual par and premium bids on an individual loan basis.
Other
Assets Acquired Through Foreclosure – Other assets acquired
through foreclosure includes real estate and other assets acquired
through foreclosure on the collateral property and is recorded at fair value
at
the time of foreclosure less estimated costs to sell. Any excess of
loan balance over the fair value of the other assets is charged-off against
the
allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, management
periodically performs a new valuation and the asset is carried at the lower
of
carrying amount or fair value less cost of disposal. Operating
expenses or income, and gains or losses on disposition of such properties,
are
recorded in current operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements– In June 2006, the FASB issued
Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”),
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for income taxes where
interpretation of the law is uncertain. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive
model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or
expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted this Statement
on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect
to our financial statements. We have concluded that there are no significant
uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 addresses how companies should
measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for
recognition or disclosure purposes under U.S. GAAP. SFAS 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective
prospectively for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company will adopt SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, and is currently
assessing the impact of the adoption of this Statement in light of recent FASB
activity. On October 17, 2007, the FASB discussed the
effective dates of both SFAS 157 and 159 (discussed below) and decided against
a
blanket deferral of the effective dates of those Statements. However,
the Board will consider a potential deferral (1) of the application of SFAS
157
to the fair value measurement of non-financial assets and liabilities, and
(2)
of Statement 157’s effective date for, as yet to be defined, “small” public
companies.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159
would allow the Company an irrevocable election to measure certain financial
assets and liabilities at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses on the
elected items recognized in earnings at each reporting period. The fair value
option may only be elected at the time of initial recognition of a financial
asset or financial liability or upon the occurrence of certain specified events.
The election is applied on an instrument by instrument basis, with a few
exceptions, and is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of
instruments. SFAS 159 also provides expanded disclosure requirements
regarding the effects of electing the fair value option on the financial
statements. SFAS 159 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating this Statement
and has not yet determined the financial assets and liabilities, if any, for
which the fair value option would be elected or the potential impact on the
consolidated financial statements, if such election were made.
2.
|
LOAN
SALES AND SERVICING
|
SBA
Loan Sales - The Company periodically sells the
guaranteed portion of selected SBA loans into the secondary market on a
servicing-retained basis. The Company retains the unguaranteed
portion of these loans and services the loans as required under the SBA programs
to retain specified yield amounts. The SBA program stipulates that
the Company retains a minimum of 5% of the loan balance, which is
unguaranteed. The percentage of each unguaranteed loan in excess of
5% may be periodically sold to a third party, typically for a cash
premium. The Company records servicing liabilities for the
unguaranteed loans sold calculated based on the present value of the estimated
future servicing costs associated with each loan. The balance of all
servicing rights and obligations is subsequently amortized over the estimated
life of the loans using an estimated prepayment rate of
25-30%. Quarterly, the servicing assets are analyzed for
impairment.
The
Company also periodically sells certain SBA 504 loans into the secondary market,
on a servicing-released basis, typically for a cash premium.
As
of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately $96.5
million and $73.6 million, respectively, in SBA loans held for
sale.
Mortgage
Loan Sales– The Company enters into mortgage loan rate lock
commitments (normally for 30 days) with potential borrowers. In
conjunction therewith, the Company enters into a forward sale commitment to
sell
the locked loan to a third party investor. This forward sale
agreement requires delivery of the loan on a “best efforts” basis but does not
obligate the Company to deliver if the mortgage loan does not fund.
The
mortgage rate lock agreement and the forward sale agreement generally qualify
as
derivatives under SFAS No. 133, as amended. The value of these
derivatives is generally equal to the fee, if any, charged to the borrower
at
inception but may fluctuate in the event of changes in interest
rates. These derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair
value, if material. Although the Company does not attempt to qualify
these transactions for the special hedge accounting afforded by SFAS No. 133,
management believes that changes in the fair value of the two commitments
generally offset and create an effective economic hedge. At September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had $1.4 million and $4.7 million,
respectively, in outstanding mortgage loan rate lock and forward sale
commitments, the impact of which was not material to the Company’s financial
position or results of operations.
3.
|
LOANS
HELD FOR INVESTMENT
|
The
composition of the Company’s loans held for investment and securitized loan
portfolio follows:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Commercial
|
$ |
66,051
|
$ |
53,725
|
||||
Real
estate
|
133,916
|
135,902
|
||||||
SBA
|
32,087
|
29,712
|
||||||
Manufactured
housing
|
163,328
|
142,804
|
||||||
Securitized
|
7,977
|
9,950
|
||||||
Other
installment
|
9,809
|
8,301
|
||||||
413,168
|
380,394
|
|||||||
Less:
|
||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
4,293
|
3,926
|
||||||
Deferred
fees, net of costs
|
51
|
17
|
||||||
Purchased
premiums on securitized loans
|
(84 | ) | (128 | ) | ||||
Discount
on SBA loans
|
671
|
802
|
||||||
Loans
held for investment, net
|
$ |
408,237
|
$ |
375,777
|
An
analysis of the allowance for credit losses for loans held for investment
follows for the three and nine months ended:
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ |
4,047
|
$ |
3,997
|
||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
547
|
12
|
||||||
Loans
charged off
|
(319 | ) | (271 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
on loans previously charged off
|
18
|
160
|
||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ |
4,293
|
$ |
3,898
|
As
of
September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, the Company also had reserves for
credit losses on undisbursed loans of $92,000 and $117,000, respectively,
included in other liabilities.
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ |
3,926
|
$ |
3,954
|
||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
769
|
337
|
||||||
Loans
charged off
|
(499 | ) | (607 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
on loans previously charged off
|
97
|
214
|
||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ |
4,293
|
$ |
3,898
|
The
recorded investment in loans that is considered to be impaired:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Impaired
loans without specific valuation allowances
|
$ |
35
|
$ |
63
|
||||
Impaired
loans with specific valuation allowances
|
10,345
|
5,145
|
||||||
Specific
valuation allowances allocated to impaired loans
|
(946 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||
Impaired
loans, net
|
$ |
9,434
|
$ |
4,567
|
||||
Average
investment in impaired loans
|
$ |
7,082
|
$ |
4,074
|
4.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
Earnings
Per Share– Basic has been computed based on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during each period. Earnings
per share – Diluted has been computed based on the weighted average number
of shares outstanding during each period plus the dilutive effect of granted
options. Earnings per share were computed as follows:
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares – Basic
|
5,877
|
5,787
|
5,852
|
5,778
|
||||||||||||
Dilutive
effect of options
|
132
|
221
|
175
|
217
|
||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares – Diluted
|
6,009
|
6,008
|
6,027
|
5,995
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
963
|
$ |
1,491
|
$ |
3,041
|
$ |
4,039
|
||||||||
Earnings
per share – Basic
|
.16
|
.26
|
.52
|
.70
|
||||||||||||
Earnings
per share – Diluted
|
.16
|
.25
|
.50
|
.67
|
5.
|
BORROWINGS
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank Advances– The Company has a blanket lien
credit line with the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”). Advances are
collateralized in the aggregate by CWB’s eligible loans and
securities. Total FHLB advances were $109.0 million and $95.0 million
at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and include $13.5
million and $44.5 million, respectively, borrowed at variable rates which adjust
either monthly or quarterly to the current LIBOR rate. At September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, CWB had securities pledged to FHLB of $36.4
million at carrying value and loans of $189.0 million, and $32.4 million at
carrying value and loans of $160.2 million, respectively. Total FHLB interest
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $3.6 million
and $2.4 million, respectively. At September 30, 2007, CWB had $10.3
million available for additional borrowing.
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
This
discussion is designed to provide insight into management’s assessment of
significant trends related to the Company's consolidated financial condition,
results of operations, liquidity, capital resources and interest rate
sensitivity. It should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the other
financial information appearing elsewhere in this
report.
Forward
Looking Statements
This
Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Those forward-looking statements include statements
regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company and its
management. Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results
may
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. The Company does not undertake any obligation to revise
or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial
statements and the related notes provided under "Item 1—Financial Statements"
above.
Overview
of Earnings Performance
The
Company earned net income of $963,000, or $0.16 per basic and diluted share,
for
the third quarter 2007. This represents a decline of 35.4% in net
income over the comparable period of 2006. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, the Company earned $3.0 million, or $0.52 per basic share
and $0.50 per diluted share, a 24.7% decline from the comparable period
2006.
The
significant factors impacting net income for the third quarter of 2007
were:
|
·
|
a
17.1% increase in interest income primarily due to higher average
loan
balances which were $500 million for the third quarter 2007 compared
to
$422 million for the same period of
2006
|
|
·
|
an
interest rate curve that was relatively flat and at times even inverted
contributed to higher deposit costs and compressed margins,
creating a decline in net interest margin to 4.39% for the
third quarter 2007 compared to 4.90% for the same period of
2006
|
|
·
|
somewhat
stabilized net interest margin as the decline from the second
quarter 2007 to the third quarter was only 6 basis points,
4.45% to 4.39%, but that may be impacted by the September 50 bp reduction
by the Fed in the target overnight
rate
|
|
·
|
the
provision for loan losses for third quarter 2007 was $547,000 and,
othe
than volume-related provisions, the primary reason was the increase
in
charged-off loans
|
|
·
|
an
increase in non-interest expenses primarily due to an additional
branch
location, increased promotional expenses and FDIC
insurance
|
The
Company continues to focus on growing its loan portfolio despite increased
industry-wide competition and a challenging interest rate
environment.
Critical
Accounting Policies
A
number
of critical accounting policies are used in the preparation of the Company’s
consolidated financial statements. These policies relate to areas of
the financial statements that involve estimates and judgments made by
management. These include: provision and allowance for loan losses
and the valuation of servicing rights. These critical accounting
policies are discussed in the Company’s 2006 10-K with a description of how the
estimates are determined and an indication of the consequences of an over or
under estimate.
The
Company believes that the discussion in Form 10-K addresses the Company’s most
critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the
portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and
require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex
judgments.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements– In June 2006, the FASB issued
Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”),
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for income taxes where
interpretation of the law is uncertain. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive
model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or
expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted this Statement
on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect
to our financial statements. We have concluded that there are no significant
uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 addresses how companies should
measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for
recognition or disclosure purposes under U.S. GAAP. SFAS 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective
prospectively for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company will adopt SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, and is currently
assessing the impact of the adoption of this Statement in light of recent FASB
activity. On October 17, 2007, the FASB discussed the
effective dates of both SFAS 157 and 159 (discussed below) and decided against
a
blanket deferral of the effective dates of those Statements. However,
the Board will consider a potential deferral (1) of the application of SFAS
157
to the fair value measurement of non-financial assets and liabilities, and
(2)
of Statement 157’s effective date for, as yet to be defined, “small” public
companies.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159
would allow the Company an irrevocable election to measure certain financial
assets and liabilities at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses on the
elected items recognized in earnings at each reporting period. The fair value
option may only be elected at the time of initial recognition of a financial
asset or financial liability or upon the occurrence of certain specified events.
The election is applied on an instrument by instrument basis, with a few
exceptions, and is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of
instruments. SFAS 159 also provides expanded disclosure requirements
regarding the effects of electing the fair value option on the financial
statements. SFAS 159 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating this Statement
and has not yet determined the financial assets and liabilities, if any, for
which the fair value option would be elected or the potential impact on the
consolidated financial statements, if such election were made.
Results
ofOperations –Third Quarter
Comparison
The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated, certain items in the
consolidated income statements of the Company and the related changes between
those periods:
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ |
12,030
|
$ |
10,276
|
$ |
1,754
|
||||||
Interest
expense
|
5,877
|
4,489
|
1,388
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
6,153
|
5,787
|
366
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
547
|
12
|
535
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
5,606
|
5,775
|
(169 | ) | ||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
1,212
|
1,453
|
(241 | ) | ||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
5,154
|
4,694
|
460
|
|||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
1,664
|
2,534
|
(870 | ) | ||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
701
|
1,043
|
(342 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
963
|
$ |
1,491
|
$ | (528 | ) | |||||
Earnings
per share – Basic
|
$ |
.16
|
$ |
.26
|
$ | (.10 | ) | |||||
Earnings
per share – Diluted
|
$ |
.16
|
$ |
.25
|
$ | (.09 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ |
1,012
|
$ |
1,525
|
$ | (513 | ) |
The
following table sets forth the changes in interest income and expense
attributable to changes in rate and volume:
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2007
versus 2006
|
||||||||||||
Total
change
|
Change
due to
|
|||||||||||
Rate
|
Volume
|
|||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Loans,
net
|
$ |
1,612
|
$ | (114 | ) | $ |
1,726
|
|||||
Investment
securities
|
90
|
35
|
55
|
|||||||||
Other
|
52
|
-
|
52
|
|||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
1,754
|
(79 | ) |
1,833
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
1,114
|
408
|
706
|
|||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
274
|
(16 | ) |
290
|
||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
1,388
|
392
|
996
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ |
366
|
$ | (471 | ) | $ |
837
|
Net
Interest Income
Total
interest income increased by $1.8 million, or 17.1%, for the third quarter
2007
compared to the third quarter 2006. Loan interest income increased by
$1.6 million, or 16.6%, for the third quarter 2007 compared to
2006. Virtually the entire increase was volume-related and was only
partly offset by the impact of the change in rates. Interest income
from manufactured housing, real-estate commercial and construction, commercial
and SBA loan increased by $667,000, $213,000, $230,000 and $582,000,
respectively for the third quarter 2007 compared to 2006. Average
loan balances for these loan categories increased by 24.6%, 8.3%, 26.0% and
34.7%, respectively, compared to the third quarter 2006. The
securitized loan portfolio continues to pay down resulting in a decline in
interest income of $58,000 or 16.1%, for the third quarter 2007 compared to
2006.
Total
interest expense increased $1.4 million, or 30.9%, for the third quarter 2007
compared to 2006. Interest on deposits increased $1.1 million, or
31.7%. Of this increase, $706,000 was attributed to deposit growth
and $408,000 to increased rates on deposits. Interest expense on FHLB
advances increased to $1.2 million for the third quarter 2007 compared to
$972,000 for the same period of 2006.
The
Federal Reserve Bank Open Market Committee’s (“FOMC”) recent rate cut will
reduce interest income on the Bank’s adjustable rate loans. Depending on market
conditions and the yield curve, the Bank’s deposit and borrowing costs may also
decline, although not necessarily in a proportional manner. The
precise impact of this combination of reduced interest income and funding costs
is difficult to determine. The Bank’s interest rate risk profile
indicates a fairly balanced response to both rate increases and
declines.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses was $547,000 for the third quarter 2007 compared
to a
provision of $12,000 the same period in 2006. The provision for the
third quarter of 2006 was relatively low because the securitized loan portfolio
experienced a negative provision of $165,000 and the provision for relationship
banking loans was $28,000. For the third quarter of 2007, the
provision related to the securitized loan portfolio was $135,000, contributing
$300,000 to the difference between 2006 and 2007. The provision on
relationship banking loans was $358,000 for the third quarter of 2007, a
$330,000 increase. Partly offsetting these increases, the Bank
experienced a decline in the provision for manufactured housing and SBA loans
of
$63,000 and $31,000, respectively.
The
economy as a whole has recently experienced setbacks in the real estate and
credit markets that have lead to a growth in non-performing assets for many
financial institutions. The Bank has experienced an increase in
impaired loans and has provided specific reserves believed to be adequate to
cover potential losses. Nonetheless, increasing provisions for
loan losses remain possible in the current economic environment.
Non-Interest
Income
Non-interest
income includes gains from sale of loans, loan document fees, service charges
on
deposit accounts, loan servicing fees and other revenues not derived from
interest on earning assets. Total non-interest income decreased by $241,000,
or
16.6%, for the third quarter 2007 primarily due to declines in loan servicing
and other loan fees of $170,000 and $116,000,
respectively. Gains on loan sales increased
$43,000. Gains on mortgage loan sales declined slightly while SBA
gain increased by $54,000.
Non-Interest
Expenses
Total
non-interest expenses increased by $460,000, or 9.8%, for the third quarter
2007
compared to the same period of 2006, primarily due to overall staff growth,
including an additional branch location and further development of two other
branches that were added in the past two years. As a result of this
growth, salaries and employee benefits increased $108,000, or 3.3%, for the
third quarter 2007 compared to 2006. Other non-interest expenses
increased by $352,000, or 24.8%, primarily due to increased rents, marketing,
FDIC assessments and various other operating expenses.
Results
of Operations –Nine-Month Comparison
The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated, certain items in the
consolidated income statements of the Company and the related changes between
those periods:
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ |
34,702
|
$ |
28,702
|
$ |
6,000
|
||||||
Interest
expense
|
16,810
|
11,913
|
4,897
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
17,892
|
16,789
|
1,103
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
769
|
337
|
432
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
17,123
|
16,452
|
671
|
|||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
3,789
|
4,359
|
(570 | ) | ||||||||
Non-interest
expenses
|
15,656
|
13,891
|
1,765
|
|||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
5,256
|
6,920
|
(1,664 | ) | ||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
2,215
|
2,881
|
(666 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
3,041
|
$ |
4,039
|
$ | (998 | ) | |||||
Earnings
per share – Basic
|
$ |
.52
|
$ |
.70
|
$ | (.18 | ) | |||||
Earnings
per share – Diluted
|
$ |
.50
|
$ |
.67
|
$ | (.17 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ |
3,114
|
$ |
3,954
|
$ | (840 | ) |
The
following table sets forth the changes in interest income and expense
attributable to changes in rate and volume:
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2007
versus 2006
|
||||||||||||
Total
change
|
Change
due to
|
|||||||||||
Rate
|
Volume
|
|||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Loans,
net
|
$ |
5,562
|
$ |
236
|
$ |
5,326
|
||||||
Investment
securities
|
264
|
114
|
150
|
|||||||||
Other
|
174
|
44
|
130
|
|||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
6,000
|
394
|
5,606
|
|||||||||
Deposits
|
3,704
|
1,600
|
2,104
|
|||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
1,193
|
125
|
1,068
|
|||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
4,897
|
1,725
|
3,172
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ |
1,103
|
$ | (1,331 | ) | $ |
2,434
|
Net
Interest Income
Net
interest income increased by $1.1 million for the first nine months of 2007
compared to 2006. Total interest income increased $6.0 million, or
20.9%, for the period ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period
in
2006. The increase was primarily due to growth in earning
assets. Average loans increased by $80.1 million, or 20.1%, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in
2006. Loan interest income increased by $5.6 million, or 20.5%, for
the first nine months of 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to increased loan
volume which contributed $5.3 million of the total increase. Interest
income from the manufactured housing, commercial real-estate and construction,
commercial and SBA loan portfolios increased by $2.2 million, $1.4 million,
$946,000 and $1.4 million, respectively. The securitized loan
portfolio interest income declined by $322,000 through September 2007 compared
to 2006 due to the continuing pay down of this portfolio.
Total
interest expense increased $4.9 million, or 41.1%, for the first nine months
of
2007 compared to 2006. Interest on deposits increased by $3.7
million, or 39.1%, compared to 2006. Of this increase, $2.1 million
was attributed to deposit growth and $1.6 million to increased interest rates
on
deposits. Interest expense on FHLB advances increased $1.2 million,
or 48.8%, for the first nine months of 2007 compared to 2006 primarily as the
result of increased borrowing. Net interest margin decreased to 4.44%
from 4.99% through September 30, 2007 compared to 2006.
The
Federal Reserve Bank Open Market Committee’s (“FOMC”) recent rate cut will
reduce interest income on the Bank’s adjustable rate loans. Depending on market
conditions and the yield curve, the Bank’s deposit and borrowing costs may also
decline, although not necessarily in a proportional manner. The
precise impact of this combination of reduced interest income and funding costs
is difficult to determine. The Bank’s interest rate risk profile
indicates a fairly balanced response to both rate increases and
declines.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses increased from $337,000 for the first nine months
of
2006 to $769,000 for 2007, or 128.2% due to increases in the provision for
SBA,
relationship banking and securitized loan provisions of $349,000, $312,000
and
$149,000, respectively. These increases were partly offset by a
decline of $375,000 in the manufactured housing provision for the first nine
months of 2007.
The
economy as a whole has recently experienced setbacks in the real estate and
credit markets that have lead to a growth in non-performing assets for many
financial institutions. The Bank has experienced an increase in
impaired loans and has provided specific reserves believed to be adequate to
cover potential losses. Nonetheless, increasing provisions for
loan losses remain possible in the current economic environment.
Non-Interest
Income
Total
non-interest income declined by $570,000, or 13.1%, for the nine months ended
September, 30 2007 compared to the same period for 2006. Non-interest
income includes loan document fees, service charges on deposit accounts, gains
on sale of loans, loan servicing fees and other revenues not derived from
interest on earning assets. The decline in non-interest income was
primarily due to a $451,000 decrease in net gains from loan sales, $404,000
of
which was SBA related. The Company sold $5.3 million in SBA
guaranteed loans through September 30, 2007 compared to $8.5 million for the
same period in 2006. Loan servicing also declined in 2007
by $214,000.
Non-Interest
Expenses
Total
non-interest expenses increased by $1.8 million, or 12.7%, for the first nine
months of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006, primarily due to overall
staff growth, including an additional branch location and further development
of
two other branches that were added in the past two years. As a result
of this growth, salaries and employee benefits increased $927,000 or 9.6%,
compared to 2006. Occupancy related costs increased $183,000 and
other non-interest expenses increased by $655,000, primarily due to increased
marketing and various other operating expenses.
Interest
Rates and Differentials
The
following table illustrates average yields on interest-earning assets and
average rates on interest-bearing liabilities for the periods
indicated.
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits in other financial institutions:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
1,035
|
$ |
640
|
$ |
900
|
$ |
571
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
11
|
7
|
30
|
18
|
||||||||||||
Average
yield
|
4.04 | % | 4.60 | % | 4.45 | % | 4.24 | % | ||||||||
Federal
funds sold:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
13,161
|
$ |
9,665
|
$ |
14,240
|
$ |
11,221
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
174
|
126
|
559
|
397
|
||||||||||||
Average
yield
|
5.24 | % | 5.15 | % | 5.25 | % | 4.73 | % | ||||||||
Investment
securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
41,032
|
$ |
36,555
|
$ |
39,412
|
$ |
35,215
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
504
|
414
|
1,407
|
1,143
|
||||||||||||
Average
yield
|
4.87 | % | 4.49 | % | 4.77 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||||
Gross
loans, excluding securitized:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
491,735
|
$ |
409,797
|
$ |
474,803
|
$ |
390,022
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
11,038
|
9,368
|
31,818
|
25,934
|
||||||||||||
Average
yield
|
8.91 | % | 9.07 | % | 8.96 | % | 8.89 | % | ||||||||
Securitized
loans:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
8,478
|
$ |
11,716
|
$ |
9,111
|
$ |
12,993
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
303
|
361
|
888
|
1,210
|
||||||||||||
Average
yield
|
14.16 | % | 12.23 | % | 13.04 | % | 12.45 | % | ||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
555,441
|
$ |
468,373
|
$ |
538,466
|
$ |
450,022
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
12,030
|
10,276
|
34,702
|
28,702
|
||||||||||||
Average
yield
|
8.59 | % | 8.70 | % | 8.62 | % | 8.53 | % |
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
74,417
|
$ |
55,379
|
$ |
61,658
|
$ |
59,259
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
720
|
457
|
1,678
|
1,340
|
||||||||||||
Average
cost of funds
|
3.84 | % | 3.27 | % | 3.64 | % | 3.02 | % | ||||||||
Savings
deposits:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
16,160
|
$ |
15,274
|
$ |
15,678
|
$ |
15,310
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
149
|
120
|
415
|
330
|
||||||||||||
Average
cost of funds
|
3.66 | % | 3.13 | % | 3.54 | % | 2.89 | % | ||||||||
Time
certificates of deposit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
289,422
|
$ |
248,989
|
$ |
289,232
|
$ |
236,273
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
3,762
|
2,940
|
11,081
|
7,800
|
||||||||||||
Average
cost of funds
|
5.16 | % | 4.69 | % | 5.12 | % | 4.41 | % | ||||||||
Other
borrowings:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
100,833
|
$ |
77,294
|
$ |
98,340
|
$ |
69,443
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,246
|
972
|
3,636
|
2,443
|
||||||||||||
Average
cost of funds
|
4.90 | % | 4.99 | % | 4.94 | % | 4.70 | % | ||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
balance
|
$ |
480,832
|
$ |
396,936
|
$ |
464,908
|
$ |
380,285
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
5,877
|
4,489
|
16,810
|
11,913
|
||||||||||||
Average
cost of funds
|
4.85 | % | 4.49 | % | 4.83 | % | 4.19 | % | ||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ |
6,153
|
$ |
5,787
|
$ |
17,892
|
$ |
16,789
|
||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
3.74 | % | 4.21 | % | 3.79 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
4.39 | % | 4.90 | % | 4.44 | % | 4.99 | % |
Average
yields and rates are derived by dividing interest income by the average balances
of interest-earning assets and by dividing interest expense by the average
balances of interest-bearing liabilities for the periods
indicated. Amounts outstanding are averages of daily balances during
the applicable periods.
Nonaccrual
loans are included in the average balance of loans outstanding.
Net
interest income is the difference between the interest and fees earned on loans
and investments and the interest expense paid on deposits and other
liabilities. The amount by which interest income will exceed interest
expense depends on the volume or balance of earning assets compared to the
volume or balance of interest-bearing deposits and liabilities and the interest
rate earned on those interest-earning assets compared to the interest rate
paid
on those interest-bearing liabilities.
Net
interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average
earning assets. It is used to measure the difference between the
average rate of interest earned on assets and the average rate of interest
that
must be paid on liabilities used to fund those assets. To maintain
its net interest margin, the Company must manage the relationship between
interest earned and paid.
Financial
Condition
Average
total assets increased by $89 million, or 19.3%, to $554 million at September
30, 2007 compared to $465 million at September 30, 2006. Average
total equity increased by 9.7% to $48.6 million at September 30, 2007 from
$44.3
million at September 30, 2006. Average total gross loans at September
30, 2007 increased by $80.9 million, or 20.1%, to $483.9 from $403.0 million
at
September 30, 2006. Average deposits also increased from $345.7
million at September 30, 2006 to $401.2 million as of September 30,
2007.
The
book
value per share increased to $8.41 at September 30, 2007 from $8.05 at December
31, 2006.
Selected
balance sheet accounts
(dollars
in thousands)
|
September
30,
2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
Percent
of Increase (Decrease)
|
||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
16,238
|
$ |
11,343
|
$ |
4,895
|
43.2 | % | ||||||||
Time
deposits in other financial institutions
|
654
|
536
|
118
|
22.0 | % | |||||||||||
Investment
securities available-for-sale
|
20,371
|
22,097
|
(1,726 | ) | (7.8 | %) | ||||||||||
Investment
securities held-to-maturity
|
16,236
|
10,535
|
5,701
|
54.1 | % | |||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
5,123
|
4,465
|
658
|
14.7 | % | |||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank stock, at cost
|
812
|
812
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Loans-held
for sale
|
96,978
|
75,795
|
21,183
|
27.9 | % | |||||||||||
Loans-held
for investment, net
|
408,237
|
375,777
|
32,460
|
8.6 | % | |||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
580,985
|
516,615
|
64,370
|
12.5 | % | |||||||||||
Total
Deposits
|
415,608
|
368,747
|
46,861
|
12.7 | % | |||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances
|
109,000
|
95,000
|
14,000
|
14.7 | % | |||||||||||
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
49,478
|
46,820
|
2,658
|
5.7 | % |
The
following schedule shows the balance and percentage change in the various
deposits:
September
30,
2007
|
December
31,
2006
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
Percent
of Increase (Decrease)
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
deposits
|
$ |
33,602
|
$ |
33,033
|
$ |
569
|
1.7 | % | |||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
78,763
|
49,975
|
28,788
|
57.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings
|
15,395
|
14,522
|
873
|
6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Time
certificates of $100,000 or more (1)
|
66,294
|
70,398
|
(4,104 | ) | (5.8 | %) | |||||||||||
Other
time certificates (1)
|
221,554
|
200,819
|
20,735
|
10.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
$ |
415,608
|
$ |
368,747
|
$ |
46,861
|
12.7 | % |
(1)
Broker deposits of $104 million at December 31, 2006 which were previously
classified as “Time certificates of $100,000 or more” have been included in
“Other time certificates”. While the Company purchases such
deposits from brokers in increments greater than $100,000, the underlying
deposits generally consist of retail units sold in small
increments.
Nonaccrual,
Past Due and Restructured Loans
A
loan is
considered impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that
the
Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or
interest under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors
considered by management in determining impairment include payment status,
collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and
interest payments. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays
or payment shortfalls generally are not classified as
impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays or
payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis. When determining the
possibility of impairment, management considers the circumstances surrounding
the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for
the delay, the borrower's prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall
in relation to the principal and interest owed. For
collateral-dependent loans, the Company uses the fair value of collateral method
to measure impairment. All other loans, except for securitized loans,
are measured for impairment based on the present value of future cash
flows. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for all loans
in the portfolio except for the securitized loans, which are evaluated for
impairment on a collective basis.
The
following schedule reflects recorded investment in loans that are considered
to
be impaired:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Impaired
loans without specific valuation allowances
|
$ |
35
|
$ |
63
|
||||
Impaired
loans with specific valuation allowances
|
10,345
|
5,145
|
||||||
Specific
valuation allowances allocated to impaired loans
|
(946 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||
Impaired
loans, net
|
$ |
9,434
|
$ |
4,567
|
||||
Average
investment in impaired loans
|
$ |
7,082
|
$ |
4,074
|
The
following schedule reflects recorded investment at the dates indicated in
certain types of loans:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||
Nonaccrual
loans
|
$ |
8,334
|
$ |
7,417
|
||||
SBA
guaranteed portion of loans included above
|
(4,931 | ) | (4,256 | ) | ||||
Nonaccrual
loans, net
|
$ |
3,403
|
$ |
3,161
|
||||
Troubled
debt restructured loans, gross
|
$ |
1,391
|
$ |
68
|
||||
Loans
30 through 89 days past due with interest accruing
|
$ |
3,187
|
$ |
2,463
|
||||
Allowance
for loan losses to gross loans
|
.84 | % | .86 | % |
CWB
generally repurchases the guaranteed portion of SBA loans from investors when
those loans become past due 120 days. After the foreclosure and
collection process is complete, the SBA reimburses CWB for this principal
balance. Therefore, although these balances do not earn interest
during this period, they generally do not result in a loss of principal to
CWB.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
Liquidity
Management
The
Company has established policies as well as analytical tools to manage
liquidity. Proper liquidity management ensures that sufficient funds
are available to meet normal operating demands in addition to unexpected
customer demand for funds, such as high levels of deposit withdrawals or
increased loan demand, in a timely and cost effective manner. The
most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public
confidence that facilitates the retention and growth of core
deposits. Ultimately, public confidence is gained through profitable
operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. The
Company’s liquidity management is viewed from a long-term and short-term
perspective, as well as from an asset and liability
perspective. Management monitors liquidity through regular reviews of
maturity profiles, funding sources and loan and deposit forecasts to minimize
funding risk. The Company has asset/liability committees (“ALCO”) at
the Board and Bank management level to review asset/liability management and
liquidity issues. The Company maintains strategic liquidity and
contingency plans. Periodically, the Company has used short-term time
certificates from other financial institutions to meet projected liquidity
needs.
CWB
has a
credit line with the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”). Advances are
collateralized in the aggregate by CWB’s eligible mortgage loans and securities
of the U.S Government and its agencies. The outstanding advances at
September 30, 2007 included $13.5 million borrowed at variable rates which
adjust to the current LIBOR rate either monthly or quarterly and $95.5 million
borrowed at fixed rates. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
CWB had securities pledged to FHLB of $36.4 million at carrying value and loans
of $189.0 million, and $32.4 million at carrying value and loans of $160.2
million, respectively. At September 30, 2007, CWB had $10.3 million
available for additional borrowing.
CWB
also
maintains three federal funds purchased lines for a total borrowing capacity
of
$18.5 million.
The
Company, through the Bank, also has the ability as a member of the Federal
Reserve System, to borrow at the discount window up to 50% of what is pledged
at
the Federal Reserve Bank.
The
Company has not experienced disintermediation and does not believe this is
a
potentially probable occurrence. The liquidity ratio of the Company
was 23% at September 30, 2007 compared to 21% at December 31,
2006. The Company’s liquidity ratio fluctuates in conjunction with
loan funding demands. The liquidity ratio consists of cash and due
from banks, deposits in other financial institutions, available for sale
investments, federal funds sold and loans held for sale, divided by total
assets.
CWBC’s
routine funding requirements primarily consist of certain operating
expenses. Normally, CWBC obtains funding to meet its obligations from
dividends collected from its subsidiary and has the capability to issue debt
securities. Federal banking laws regulate the amount of dividends
that may be paid by banking subsidiaries without prior approval.
Interest
Rate Risk
The
Company is exposed to different types of interest rate risks. These
risks include: lag, repricing, basis and prepayment risk.
|
·
|
Lag
Risk – lag risk results from the inherent timing difference between
the repricing of the Company’s adjustable rate assets and
liabilities. For instance, certain loans tied to the prime rate
index may only reprice on a quarterly basis. However, at a
community bank such as CWB, when rates are rising, funding sources
tend to
reprice more slowly than the loans. Therefore, for CWB, the
effect of this timing difference is generally favorable during a
period of
rising interest rates and unfavorable during a period of declining
interest rates. This lag can produce some short-term
volatility, particularly in times of numerous prime rate
changes.
|
|
·
|
Repricing
Risk– repricing risk is caused by the mismatch in the maturities /
repricing periods between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. If CWB was perfectly matched, the net interest
margin would expand during rising rate periods and contract during
falling
rate periods. This is so since loans tend to reprice more
quickly than do funding sources. Typically, since CWB is
somewhat asset sensitive, this would also tend to expand the net
interest
margin during times of interest rate
increases.
|
|
·
|
Basis
Risk– item pricing tied to different indices may tend to react
differently, however, all CWB’s variable products are priced off the prime
rate.
|
|
|
Prepayment
Risk– prepayment risk results from borrowers paying down / off their
loans prior to maturity. Prepayments on fixed-rate products
increase in falling interest rate environments and decrease in rising
interest rate environments. Since a majority of CWB’s loan
originations are adjustable rate and set based on prime, and there
is
little lag time on the reset, CWB does not experience significant
prepayments. However, CWB does have more prepayment risk on its
securitized and manufactured housing loans and its mortgage-backed
investment securities.
|
Management
of Interest Rate Risk
To
mitigate the impact of changes in market interest rates on the Company’s
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the amounts and
maturities are actively managed. Short-term, adjustable-rate assets
are generally retained as they have similar repricing characteristics as our
funding sources. CWB sells mortgage products and a portion of its SBA
loan originations. While the Company has some interest rate exposure
in excess of five years, it has internal policy limits designed to minimize
risk
should interest rates rise. Currently, the Company does not use
derivative instruments to help manage risk, but will consider such instruments
in the future if the perceived need should arise.
Loan
sales - The Company’s ability to originate, purchase and sell loans is also
significantly impacted by changes in interest rates. Increases in
interest rates may also reduce the amount of loan and commitment fees received
by CWB. A significant decline in interest rates could also decrease
the size of CWB’s servicing portfolio and the related servicing income by
increasing the level of prepayments.
Capital
Resources
The
Company (on a consolidated basis) and CWB are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure
to
meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly
additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could
have
a direct material effect on the Company’s and CWB’s financial statements. Under
capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action, the Company and CWB must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of the Company’s and CWB’s assets, liabilities and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The Company’s and CWB’s capital amounts and classification
are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components,
risk weightings and other factors. Prompt corrective action
provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
The
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”) contains rules
as to the legal and regulatory environment for insured depository institutions,
including reductions in insurance coverage for certain kinds of deposits,
increased supervision by the federal regulatory agencies, increased reporting
requirements for insured institutions and new regulations concerning internal
controls, accounting and operations. The prompt corrective action
regulations of FDICIA define specific capital categories based on the
institutions’ capital ratios. The capital categories, in declining
order, are “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”,
“significantly undercapitalized” and “critically
undercapitalized”. To be considered “well capitalized”, an
institution must have a core capital ratio of at least 5% and a total risk-based
capital ratio of at least 10%. Additionally, FDICIA imposes Tier I
risk-based capital ratio of at least 6% to be considered “well
capitalized”. Tier I risk-based capital is, primarily, common stock
and retained earnings, net of goodwill and other intangible assets.
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the
Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the
following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations)
to
risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average
assets (as defined). The Company’s and CWB’s actual capital amounts
and ratios as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are presented in
the
table below:
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Total
Capital
|
Tier
1 Capital
|
Risk-Weighted
Assets
|
Adjusted
Average Assets
|
Total
Capital Ratio
|
Tier
1 Capital Ratio
|
Tier
1 Leverage Ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
September
30, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CWBC
(Consolidated)
|
$ |
53,702
|
$ |
49,409
|
$ |
485,475
|
$ |
558,025
|
11.06 | % | 10.18 | % | 8.59 | % | ||||||||||||||
CWB
|
49,498
|
45,205
|
485,495
|
553,787
|
10.20
|
9.31
|
7.92
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CWBC
(Consolidated)
|
$ |
50,692
|
$ |
46,766
|
$ |
442,571
|
$ |
507,718
|
11.45 | % | 10.57 | % | 9.21 | % | ||||||||||||||
CWB
|
46,842
|
42,916
|
442,624
|
503,800
|
10.58
|
9.70
|
8.52
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Well
capitalized ratios
|
10.00
|
6.00
|
5.00
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
capital ratios
|
8.00
|
4.00
|
4.00
|
The
Company does not anticipate any material changes in its capital
resources. CWBC has common equity only and does not have any
off-balance sheet financing arrangements. The Company has not
reissued any treasury stock nor does it have any immediate plans or programs
to
do so.
Supervision
and Regulation
|
Banking
is a complex, highly regulated industry. The banking regulatory scheme serves
not to protect investors, but is designed to maintain a safe and sound banking
system, to protect depositors and the FDIC insurance fund, and to facilitate
the
conduct of sound monetary policy. In furtherance of these goals,
Congress and the states have created several largely autonomous regulatory
agencies and enacted numerous laws that govern banks, bank holding companies
and
the banking industry. Consequently, the Company's growth and earnings
performance, as well as that of CWB, may be affected not only by management
decisions and general economic conditions, but also by the requirements of
applicable state and federal statutes and regulations and the policies of
various governmental regulatory authorities, including the Board of Governors
of
the Federal Reserve Bank ("FRB”), the FDIC, and the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency ("OCC"). For a detailed discussion of the regulatory
scheme governing the Company and CWB, please see the discussion in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation – Supervision and Regulation."
ITEM
3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
There
has
been no material change in the Company's market risk since the end of the last
fiscal year. For information about the Company's market risk, see the
information contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K under the
caption "Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk,"
which is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM
4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the
participation of the Company’s management, carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of the end
of
the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in making known to them material information relating
to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included
in this report.
Disclosure
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity’s disclosure
objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objections is affected
by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These
include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as
simple errors or mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established
process.
There
was
no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, known to
the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during
the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
The
Company is involved in various litigation of a routine nature that is being
handled and defended in the ordinary course of the Company’s
business. In the opinion of management, based in part on consultation
with legal counsel, the resolution of these litigation matters will not have
a
material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
Investing
in the Company’s common stock involves risks which are particular to the
Company, our industry and its market area. These risks include, but
are not limited to, changes in the real estate and credit markets, interest
rate
fluctuations and increased competition. While many of the recent events in
the
financial markets may not directly affect the Company, there is always the
potential that such effects on the overall financial markets and economy will
adversely affect the Company in the future. See the discussion
of risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A of the Company’s 2006 Annual
Report on Form 10-K .
ITEM
2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
None
ITEM
3.
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
None
ITEM
4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
None
ITEM
5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
Exhibits.
|
10.1
|
Employment
and Confidentiality Agreement dated September 6, 2007 among Community
West
Bank, Community West Bancshares and Richard M. Favor (incorporated
by
reference from the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
November 2, 2007).
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as
amended.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as
amended.
|
|
*32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b), promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
1350.
|
*This
certification is furnished
to, but shall not be deemed filed, with the Commission. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Registrant
specifically incorporates it by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report
to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
COMMUNITY
WEST BANCSHARES
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date:
November 13, 2007
|
/s/Charles
G. Baltuskonis
|
|
Charles
G. Baltuskonis
|
||
Executive
Vice President and
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
On
Behalf of Registrant and as
|
||
Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
of Document
|
10.1
|
Employment
and Confidentiality Agreement dated September 6, 2007 among Community
West
Bank, Community West Bancshares and Richard M. Favor (incorporated
by
reference from the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
November 2, 2007).
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as
amended.
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b), promulgated under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18
U.S.C.1350.
|
______________
*This
certification is furnished to, but shall not be deemed filed, with the
Commission. This certification shall not be deemedto be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
ExchangeAct of 1934, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically
incorporates it by reference.
25