Compass Diversified Holdings - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 0-51937 | 57-6218917 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of | (Commission file number) | (I.R.S. employer | ||
incorporation or organization) | identification number) |
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 0-51938 | 20-3812051 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of | (Commission file number) | (I.R.S. employer | ||
incorporation or organization) | identification number) |
Sixty One Wilton Road
Second Floor
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 221-1703
Second Floor
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 221-1703
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,
if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May 1, 2009, there were 31,525,000 shares of
Compass Diversified Holdings outstanding.
Compass Diversified Holdings outstanding.
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the period ended March 31, 2009
For the period ended March 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
Number | ||||
Forward-looking Statements |
4 | |||
Part I Financial Information |
5 | |||
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
5 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 (unaudited)
and December 31, 2008 |
5 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited) |
6 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 (unaudited) |
7 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited) |
8 | |||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
9 | |||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations |
20 | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
37 | |||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
37 | |||
Part II Other Information |
38 | |||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
38 | |||
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
38 | |||
Item 6. Exhibits |
38 | |||
Signatures |
39 | |||
Exhibit Index |
41 |
2
NOTE TO READER
In reading this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to:
| the Trust and Holdings refer to Compass Diversified Holdings; | ||
| businesses refer to, collectively, the businesses controlled by the Company; | ||
| the Company refer to Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC; | ||
| the Manager refer to Compass Group Management LLC (CGM); | ||
| the initial businesses refer to, collectively, CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. (doing business as Staffmark) (Staffmark), Crosman Acquisition Corporation, Compass AC Holdings, Inc. and Silvue Technologies Group, Inc.; | ||
| the 2007 acquisitions refer to, collectively, the acquisitions of Aeroglide Corporation, HALO Branded Solutions and American Furniture Manufacturing; | ||
| the 2008 acquisitions refer to, collectively, the acquisitions of Fox Factory Inc. and Staffmark Investment LLC; | ||
| the 2008 dispositions refer to, collectively, the sales of Aeroglide Corporation and Silvue Technologies Group, Inc.; | ||
| the Trust Agreement refer to the amended and restated Trust Agreement of the Trust dated as of April 25, 2007; | ||
| the Credit Agreement refer to the Credit Agreement with a group of lenders led by Madison Capital, LLC which provides for a Revolving Credit Facility and a Term Loan Facility; | ||
| the Revolving Credit Facility refer to the $340 million Revolving Credit Facility provided by the Credit Agreement that matures in December 2012; | ||
| the Term Loan Facility refer to the $77.5 million Term Loan Facility, as of March 31, 2009, provided by the Credit Agreement that matures in December 2013; | ||
| the LLC Agreement refer to the second amended and restated operating agreement of the Company dated as of January 9, 2007; and | ||
| we, us and our refer to the Trust, the Company and the businesses together. |
3
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, contains both historical and forward-looking statements.
We may, in some cases, use words such as project, predict, believe, anticipate, plan,
expect, estimate, intend, should, would, could, potentially, or may, or other words
that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including, among other things:
| our ability to successfully operate our businesses on a combined basis, and to effectively integrate and improve any future acquisitions; | ||
| our ability to remove CGM and CGMs right to resign; | ||
| our organizational structure, which may limit our ability to meet our dividend and distribution policy; | ||
| our ability to service and comply with the terms of our indebtedness; | ||
| our cash flow available for distribution and our ability to make distributions in the future to our shareholders; | ||
| our ability to pay the management fee, profit allocation when due and to pay the put price if and when due; | ||
| our ability to make and finance future acquisitions; | ||
| our ability to implement our acquisition and management strategies; | ||
| the regulatory environment in which our businesses operate; | ||
| trends in the industries in which our businesses operate; | ||
| changes in general economic or business conditions or economic or demographic trends in the United States and other countries in which we have a presence, including changes in interest rates and inflation; | ||
| environmental risks affecting the business or operations of our businesses; | ||
| our and CGMs ability to retain or replace qualified employees of our businesses and CGM; | ||
| costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims; and | ||
| extraordinary or force majeure events affecting the business or operations of our businesses. |
Our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities could differ materially from those
expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Additional risks of which we are not
currently aware or which we currently deem immaterial could also cause our actual results to
differ.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on
any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking events discussed in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q may not occur. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Quarterly
Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to
reflect subsequent events or circumstances, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise, except as required by law.
4
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 32,420 | $ | 97,473 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $4,958 at March 31, 2009
and $4,824 at December 31, 2008 |
119,917 | 164,035 | ||||||
Inventories |
47,639 | 50,909 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
25,536 | 22,784 | ||||||
Total current assets |
225,512 | 335,201 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
29,316 | 30,763 | ||||||
Goodwill |
288,669 | 339,095 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
234,684 | 249,489 | ||||||
Deferred debt issuance costs, less accumulated amortization of
$3,787 at March 31, 2009 and $3,317 at December 31, 2008 |
6,653 | 8,251 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
21,254 | 21,537 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 806,088 | $ | 984,336 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 31,402 | $ | 48,699 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
54,914 | 57,109 | ||||||
Due to related party |
462 | 604 | ||||||
Current portion, long-term debt |
2,000 | 2,000 | ||||||
Current portion of workers compensation liability |
27,386 | 26,916 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
3,303 | 4,042 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
119,467 | 139,370 | ||||||
Supplemental put obligation |
5,252 | 13,411 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
61,048 | 86,138 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
75,500 | 151,000 | ||||||
Workers compensation liability |
42,350 | 40,852 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
8,317 | 9,687 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
311,934 | 440,458 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Trust shares, no par value, 500,000 authorized; 31,525 shares issued
and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 |
443,705 | 443,705 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2,596 | ) | (5,242 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest (See Note B) |
65,098 | 79,431 | ||||||
Accumulated earnings (deficit) |
(12,053 | ) | 25,984 | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
494,154 | 543,878 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 806,088 | $ | 984,336 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 111,912 | $ | 115,143 | ||||
Service revenues |
163,002 | 235,991 | ||||||
Total revenues |
274,914 | 351,134 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
78,677 | 79,776 | ||||||
Cost of services |
138,628 | 196,550 | ||||||
Gross profit |
57,609 | 74,808 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Staffing expense |
20,940 | 25,070 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
37,755 | 36,683 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense (reversal) |
(8,159 | ) | 2,318 | |||||
Management fees |
3,072 | 3,651 | ||||||
Amortization expense |
6,196 | 6,130 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
59,800 | | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(61,995 | ) | 956 | |||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest income |
61 | 315 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(3,542 | ) | (4,672 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
(470 | ) | (485 | ) | ||||
Loss on debt repayment |
(3,652 | ) | | |||||
Other income (expense), net |
(79 | ) | 255 | |||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interest |
(69,677 | ) | (3,631 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(27,444 | ) | (293 | ) | ||||
Loss from continuing operations before noncontrolling interest |
(42,233 | ) | (3,338 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
| 2,030 | ||||||
Net loss before noncontrolling interest |
(42,233 | ) | (1,308 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(14,915 | ) | (513 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
$ | (27,318 | ) | $ | (795 | ) | ||
Amounts attributable to Holdings: |
||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (27,318 | ) | $ | (2,825 | ) | ||
Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
| 2,030 | ||||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
$ | (27,318 | ) | $ | (795 | ) | ||
Basic and fully diluted net loss per share attributable to Holdings: |
||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.87 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Discontinued operations |
| 0.06 | ||||||
Basic and fully diluted net loss per share attributable to Holdings |
$ | (0.87 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of shares of trust stock outstanding basic and fully diluted |
31,525 | 31,525 | ||||||
Cash distributions declared per share |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.325 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
(unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Non- | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Earnings | Controlling | Comprehensive | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Shares | Amount | (Deficit) | Interest | Loss | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2008 |
31,525 | $ | 443,705 | $ | 25,984 | $ | 79,431 | $ | (5,242 | ) | $ | 543,878 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
| | (27,318 | ) | | | (27,318 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss cash flow hedge |
| | | | 2,646 | 2,646 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | | (14,915 | ) | | (14,915 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Option activity attributable to noncontrolling interest |
| | | 533 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from noncontrolling interest holders |
| | | 49 | | 49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions paid |
| | (10,719 | ) | | | (10,719 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance March 31, 2009 |
31,525 | $ | 443,705 | $ | (12,053 | ) | $ | 65,098 | $ | (2,596 | ) | $ | 494,154 | |||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Three months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
$ | (27,318 | ) | $ | (795 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation expense |
2,204 | 2,279 | ||||||
Amortization expense |
6,196 | 6,912 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
59,800 | | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
470 | 485 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense (reversal) |
(8,159 | ) | 2,318 | |||||
Noncontrolling interests |
(14,915 | ) | (290 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling stockholder charges |
901 | 366 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
(24,780 | ) | (1,445 | ) | ||||
Loss on debt repayment |
3,652 | | ||||||
Other |
(61 | ) | 161 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: |
||||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
45,651 | 19,623 | ||||||
Decrease in inventories |
3,292 | 812 | ||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(2,290 | ) | (18,296 | ) | ||||
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(18,819 | ) | 18,032 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
25,824 | 30,162 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(1,327 | ) | (164,221 | ) | ||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,114 | ) | (4,764 | ) | ||||
Other investing activities |
72 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,369 | ) | (168,985 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Borrowings under Credit Agreement |
| 55,000 | ||||||
Repayments under Credit Agreement |
(75,500 | ) | (10,693 | ) | ||||
Debt issuance costs |
| (327 | ) | |||||
Distributions paid |
(10,719 | ) | (10,246 | ) | ||||
Swap termination fee |
(2,517 | ) | | |||||
Other |
228 | (66 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(88,508 | ) | 33,668 | |||||
Foreign currency adjustment |
| (170 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(65,053 | ) | (105,325 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
97,473 | 119,358 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 32,420 | $ | 14,033 | ||||
Supplemental non-cash financing and investing activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
- Issuance of CBS Personnels common stock valued at $47.9 million in connection with the
acquisition of Staffmark LLC.
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
Compass Diversified Holdings
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
March 31, 2009
Note A Organization and business operations
Compass Diversified Holdings, a Delaware statutory trust (Holdings), was organized in Delaware on
November 18, 2005. Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(the Company), was also formed on November 18, 2005. Compass Group Management LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (CGM or the Manager), was the sole owner of 100% of the Interests of
the Company as defined in the Companys operating agreement, dated as of November 18, 2005, which
were subsequently reclassified as the Allocation Interests pursuant to the Companys amended and
restated operating agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006 (as amended and restated, the LLC
Agreement).
Note B Presentation and principles of consolidation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, are unaudited, and in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments necessary for a
fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Such adjustments consist
solely of normal recurring items. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a
full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) and
presented as permitted by Form 10-Q and do not contain certain information included in the annual
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of the Company. These interim condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
Changes in basis of presentation
The 2008 financial information has been recast so that the basis of presentation is consistent with
that of the 2009 financial information. This recast reflects (i) the financial condition and
results of operations of Aeroglide Holdings, Inc. (Aeroglide) and Silvue Technologies Group, Inc.
(Silvue) as discontinued operations for all periods presented; and (ii) the adoption of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160).
Seasonality
Earnings of certain of the Companys business segments are seasonal in nature. Earnings from
AFM Holdings Corporation (AFM or American Furniture) are typically highest in the months of
March through June of each year, coinciding with homeowners tax refunds. Earnings from CBS
Personnel Holdings, Inc. (doing business as Staffmark) (Staffmark) are typically lower in the
first quarter of each year than in other quarters due to reduced seasonal demand for temporary
staffing services and to lower gross margins during that period associated with the front-end
loading of certain payroll taxes and other payments associated with payroll paid to our
employees. Earnings from HALO Lee Wayne LLC (HALO) are typically highest in the months of
September through December of each year primarily as the result of calendar sales and holiday
promotions. HALO generates approximately two-thirds of its operating income in the months of
September through December.
Goodwill
The Company completed its 2008 annual goodwill impairment testing as of April 30, 2008 in
accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). During the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company changed the date of its annual goodwill impairment
testing to March 31 in order to move the impairment testing to a fiscal quarter ending date when
data necessary to perform the annual testing is more readily available and more robust. The Company
believes that the resulting change in accounting principle related to the annual testing date did
not delay, accelerate, or avoid an impairment charge. The Company determined that the change in
accounting principle related to the annual testing date is preferable under the circumstances and
does not result in adjustments to the Companys financial statements when applied retrospectively.
Please refer to Note G for the results of the Companys 2009 annual impairment testing.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and all majority
owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
9
Note C Recent accounting pronouncements
In March 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities
Assumed in a Business Combination (FSP FAS 141(R)-1), which amends the guidance in SFAS 141
(revised), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) for the initial recognition and measurement,
subsequent measurement, and disclosures of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a
business combination. In addition, FSP FAS 141(R)-1 amends the existing guidance related to
accounting for pre-existing contingent consideration assumed as part of the business combination.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 is effective for the Company January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141R and FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 did not have a significant impact on the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. However, any business combinations entered into in the future may impact the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of the potential earnings volatility due to the
changes described above.
The FASB issued the following new accounting standards on April 9, 2009. The Companys plans to
adopt each standard in the second quarter of 2009, and does not expect that the adoption of any of
these standards will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
(FSP No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2)
FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 modifies the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for
debt securities through increased consistency in the timing of impairment recognition and
enhanced disclosures related to the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities
that are not expected to be sold. In addition, increased disclosures are required for both debt
and equity securities regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities
with unrealized losses. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 will be effective for interim and
annual reporting periods that end after June 15, 2009, which, for the Company, would be its
2009 second quarter.
FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1)
FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 requires fair value disclosures for financial
instruments that are not reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.
Prior to the issuance of FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, the fair values of those
assets and liabilities were disclosed only once each year. With the issuance of FSP FAS
No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, the Company will now be required to disclose this
information on a quarterly basis, providing quantitative and qualitative information about fair
value estimates for all financial instruments not measured in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets at fair value. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 will be effective for
interim reporting periods that end after June 15, 2009, which, for the Company, would be its
2009 second quarter.
FSP FAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS
No. 157-4)
FSP FAS No. 157-4 clarifies the methodology used to determine fair value when there is no
active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. FSP FAS
No. 157-4 also reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, as stated in FAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which is to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an
orderly transaction. It also reaffirms the need to use judgment to determine if a formerly
active market has become inactive, as well as to determine fair values when markets have become
inactive. FSP FAS No. 157-4 will be applied prospectively and will be effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, which, for the Company, would be its 2009
second quarter.
Note D Discontinued operations
2008 Dispositions
On June 24, 2008, the Company sold its majority owned subsidiary, Aeroglide, for a total enterprise
value of $95.0 million. In addition, on June 25, 2008, the Company sold its majority owned
subsidiary, Silvue, for a total enterprise value of $95.0 million. Summarized operating results
for the 2008 dispositions for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were as follows (in thousands):
10
Aeroglide | Silvue | |||||||
For the Three | For the Three | |||||||
Months Ended | Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2008 | March 31, 2008 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 16,156 | $ | 5,465 | ||||
Operating income |
2,020 | 1,016 | ||||||
Other
(expense) income |
(3 | ) | 63 | |||||
Provision for income taxes |
439 | 406 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
79 | 142 | ||||||
Income from discontinued
operations (1) |
$ | 1,499 | $ | 531 | ||||
(1) | The results above for the three months ended March 31, 2008 exclude $0.8 million and $0.3 million of intercompany interest expense for Aeroglide and Silvue, respectively. |
Note E Business segment data
At March 31, 2009, the Company had six reportable business segments. Each business segment
represents an acquisition. The Companys reportable segments are strategic business units that
offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each business requires
different technology and marketing strategies.
A description of each of the reportable segments and the types of products and services from which
each segment derives its revenues is as follows:
| Compass AC Holdings, Inc. (ACI or Advanced Circuits), an electronic components manufacturing company, is a provider of prototype and quick-turn printed circuit boards. ACI manufactures and delivers custom printed circuit boards to customers mainly in North America. ACI is headquartered in Aurora, Colorado. | ||
| AFM is a leading domestic manufacturer of upholstered furniture for the promotional segment of the marketplace. AFM offers a broad product line of stationary and motion furniture, including sofas, loveseats, sectionals, recliners and complementary products, sold primarily at retail price points ranging between $199 and $699. AFM is a low-cost manufacturer and is able to ship any product in its line within 48 hours of receiving an order. AFM is headquartered in Ecru, Mississippi and its products are sold in the United States. | ||
| Anodyne Medical Device, Inc. (Anodyne), a medical support surfaces company, is a manufacturer of patient positioning devices primarily used for the prevention and treatment of pressure wounds experienced by patients with limited or no mobility. Anodyne is headquartered in Florida and its products are sold primarily in North America. | ||
| Fox Factory Holding Corp. (Fox) is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of high end suspension products for mountain bikes, all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles and other off-road vehicles. Fox acts as both a tier one supplier to leading action sport original equipment manufacturers and provides after-market products to retailers and distributors. Fox is headquartered in Watsonville, California and its products are primarily sold in North America. | ||
| HALO, operating under the brand names of HALO and Lee Wayne, serves as a one-stop shop for over 40,000 customers providing design, sourcing, and management and fulfillment services across all categories of its customer promotional product needs. HALO has established itself as a leader in the promotional products and marketing industry through its focus on service through its approximately 1,000 account executives. HALO is headquartered in Sterling, Illinois. | ||
| CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc. (doing business as Staffmark) (Staffmark), a human resources outsourcing firm, is a provider of temporary staffing services in the United States. Staffmark serves approximately 6,500 corporate and small business clients. Staffmark also offers employee leasing services, permanent staffing and temporary-to-permanent placement services. Staffmark is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. |
The tabular information that follows shows data of reportable segments reconciled to amounts
reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The operations of each of the businesses are
included in consolidated operating results as of their date of acquisition. Revenues from
geographic locations outside the United States were not material for each reportable segment,
except Fox, in each of the periods presented below.
11
Fox recorded net sales to locations outside
the United States of $13.3 million and $15.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. There were no significant inter-segment transactions.
Segment profit is determined based on internal performance measures used by the Chief Executive
Officer to assess the performance of each business. Segment profit excludes acquisition related
amounts and charges not pushed down to the segments, which are reflected in Corporate and other.
A disaggregation of the Companys consolidated revenue and other financial data for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is presented below (in thousands):
Net sales of business segments
Three-months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ACI |
$ | 11,988 | $ | 14,284 | ||||
American Furniture |
41,504 | 37,180 | ||||||
Anodyne |
11,604 | 11,467 | ||||||
Fox |
20,105 | 23,437 | ||||||
Halo |
26,711 | 28,775 | ||||||
Staffmark |
163,002 | 235,991 | ||||||
Total |
274,914 | 351,134 | ||||||
Reconciliation of segment revenues to consolidated revenues: |
||||||||
Corporate and other |
| | ||||||
Total consolidated revenues |
$ | 274,914 | $ | 351,134 | ||||
Profit (loss) of business segments (1)
Three-months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ACI |
$ | 3,624 | $ | 4,783 | ||||
American Furniture |
2,202 | 3,708 | ||||||
Anodyne |
1,144 | 456 | ||||||
Fox |
(849 | ) | (198 | ) | ||||
Halo |
(2,052 | ) | (775 | ) | ||||
Staffmark (2) |
(58,471 | ) | 1,409 | |||||
Total |
(54,402 | ) | 9,383 | |||||
Reconciliation of segment profit (loss) to consolidated loss from
continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling
interest: |
||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(3,481 | ) | (4,357 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense) |
(79 | ) | 255 | |||||
Corporate and other (3) |
(11,715 | ) | (8,912 | ) | ||||
Total consolidated loss from continuing operations before income
taxes and noncontrolling interest |
$ | (69,677 | ) | $ | (3,631 | ) | ||
(1) | Segment profit (loss) represents operating income (loss). | |
(2) | Includes $50.0 million of goodwill impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2009. See Note G. | |
(3) | Corporate and other consists of charges at the corporate level and purchase accounting adjustments not pushed down to the segment. In addition, Corporate includes $9.8 million of Staffmarks intangible asset impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2009, not pushed down to the segment. See Note G. |
12
Accounts receivable and allowances
Accounts Receivable | Accounts Receivable | |||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ACI |
$ | 2,883 | $ | 3,131 | ||||
American Furniture |
15,019 | 11,149 | ||||||
Anodyne |
5,833 | 6,919 | ||||||
Fox |
6,655 | 10,201 | ||||||
Halo |
16,614 | 29,358 | ||||||
Staffmark |
77,871 | 108,101 | ||||||
Total |
124,875 | 168,859 | ||||||
Reconciliation of segment data to consolidated totals: |
||||||||
Corporate and other |
| | ||||||
Total |
124,875 | 168,859 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(4,958 | ) | (4,824 | ) | ||||
Total consolidated net accounts receivable |
$ | 119,917 | $ | 164,035 | ||||
Goodwill and identifiable assets
of business segments
Depreciation and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization Expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable | Identifiable | for the Three-months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | Goodwill | Assets | Assets | Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | Mar. 31, 2009(1) | Dec. 31, 2008(1) | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
ACI |
$ | 50,659 | $ | 50,659 | $ | 20,324 | $ | 20,309 | $ | 943 | $ | 920 | ||||||||||||
American Furniture |
41,435 | 41,435 | 60,285 | 67,752 | 989 | 910 | ||||||||||||||||||
Anodyne |
19,555 | 22,747 | 23,622 | 23,784 | 666 | 664 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fox |
31,372 | 31,372 | 81,243 | 83,246 | 1,648 | 1,893 | ||||||||||||||||||
Halo |
39,758 | 40,184 | 47,445 | 46,291 | 855 | 703 | ||||||||||||||||||
Staffmark |
89,715 | 139,715 | 89,296 | 84,947 | 2,028 | 1,709 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
272,494 | 326,112 | 322,215 | 326,329 | 7,129 | 6,799 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of segment data to consolidated
total: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other identifiable assets |
| | 75,287 | 154,877 | 1,271 | 1,186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
| | | | 470 | 485 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill carried at Corporate level (2) |
16,175 | 12,983 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 288,669 | $ | 339,095 | $ | 397,502 | $ | 481,206 | $ | 8,870 | $ | 8,470 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Does not include accounts receivable balances per schedule above. | |
(2) | Represents goodwill resulting from purchase accounting adjustments not pushed down to the segments. This amount is allocated back to the respective segments for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. |
Note F Property, plant and equipment and inventory
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
(in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Machinery, equipment and software |
$ | 26,546 | $ | 26,024 | ||||
Office furniture and equipment |
10,212 | 10,501 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
5,999 | 6,030 | ||||||
42,757 | 42,555 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(13,441 | ) | (11,792 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 29,316 | $ | 30,763 | ||||
13
Depreciation expense was $2.2 million and $1.9 million for the three-month periods ended March 31,
2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
Inventory is comprised of the following at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 33,534 | $ | 34,405 | ||||
Finished goods |
15,265 | 17,571 | ||||||
Less: obsolescence reserve |
(1,160 | ) | (1,067 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 47,639 | $ | 50,909 | ||||
Note G Goodwill and other intangible assets
Goodwill impairment
The Company completed its 2009 annual goodwill impairment testing in accordance with SFAS No. 142
as of March 31, 2009. This annual impairment test involved a two-step process. The first step of
the impairment test involved comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their
aggregate carrying values, including goodwill.
The Company determined fair values for each of its reporting units using both the income and market
approach. For purposes of the income approach, fair value was determined based on the present value
of estimated future cash flows, discounted at an appropriate risk-adjusted rate. The Company used
its internal forecasts to estimate future cash flows and included an estimate of long-term future
growth rates based on its most recent views of the long-term outlook for each business. Actual
results may differ from those assumed in the forecasts. Discount rates were derived by applying
market derived inputs and analyzing published rates for industries comparable to the Companys
reporting units. The Company used discount rates that are commensurate with the risks and
uncertainty inherent in the financial markets generally and in the internally developed forecasts.
Discount rates used in these reporting unit valuations ranged from approximately 15% to 16%.
Valuations using the market approach reflect prices and other relevant observable information
generated by market transactions involving businesses comparable to the Companys reporting units.
The Company assesses the valuation methodology under the market approach based upon the relevance
and availability of data at the time of performing the valuation and weighs the methodologies
appropriately.
Based on the results of the annual impairment tests performed as of March 31, 2009, an indication
of impairment existed at the Companys Staffmark reporting unit. In each of the other businesses
(reporting units) the result of the annual goodwill impairment test
indicated that the fair
value of the business exceeded its carrying value. Based on the preliminary results of the second
step of the impairment test, the Company estimated that the carrying value of the Staffmark
goodwill exceeded its fair value by approximately $50.0 million. As a result of this shortfall,
the Company recorded a $50.0 million pretax goodwill impairment charge to impairment expense on the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
carrying amount of Staffmark exceeded its fair value due to the recent and projected significant
decrease in revenue and operating profit at Staffmark resulting from the negative impact on
temporary staffing and permanent placement revenues due to the depressed macroeconomic conditions
and downward employment trends. The results of the annual impairment tests performed as of April
30, 2008 and 2007 indicated that the fair values of the reporting units (businesses) exceeded their
carrying values and, therefore, goodwill was not impaired. Accordingly, there were no charges for
goodwill impairment in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Estimating the fair value of reporting units involves the use of estimates and significant
judgments that are based on a number of factors including actual operating results, future business
plans, economic projections and market data. Actual results may differ from forecasted results.
While no impairment was indicated in the Companys step one goodwill impairment tests in the
reporting units other than Staffmark, if current economic conditions persist longer or deteriorate
further than expected, it is reasonably possible that the judgments and estimates described above
could change in future periods for each of the Companys reporting units.
The goodwill impairment charge
related to the Companys Staffmark reporting unit,
reflects the preliminary indication from the impairment analysis
performed to date and is subject to finalization of certain fair value estimates being performed
with the assistance of an outside independent valuation specialist, and may be adjusted when all
aspects of the analysis are completed. The Company currently expects to finalize its goodwill
impairment analysis during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Any adjustments to the Companys
preliminary estimate of impairment as a result of completion of this evaluation are currently
expected to be recorded in the Companys consolidated financial statements for the second quarter
of fiscal 2009. The goodwill impairment charge does not have any adverse effect on the covenant
calculations or compliance under the Companys Credit Agreement.
14
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of goodwill for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
$ | 218,817 | ||
Acquisition of businesses |
117,031 | |||
Acquired goodwill in connection with Anodyne CEO promissory note |
3,191 | |||
Adjustment to purchase accounting |
56 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
339,095 | |||
Impairment at the Staffmark business segment |
(50,000 | ) | ||
Acquisition of businesses (1) |
951 | |||
Adjustment to purchase accounting |
(1,377 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 288,669 | ||
(1) | The Companys HALO business segment acquired one add-on acquisition during the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
Other intangible assets
In connection with the annual goodwill impairment testing, we tested other indefinite-lived
intangible assets at our Staffmark reporting unit. As a result of this analysis we determined
that the carrying value exceeded the fair value of the CBS Personnel trade name (an
indefinite-lived asset), based principally on the phase-out of the CBS Personnel trade name and
rebranding of the reporting unit to Staffmark beginning in February 2009. The fair value of the
CBS Personnel trade name was determined by applying the income approach to forecasted revenues at
the Staffmark reporting unit. The result of this analysis indicated that the carrying value of the
trade name ($10.6 million) exceeded its fair value ($0.8 million) by approximately $9.8 million.
Therefore, an impairment charge of $9.8 million is recorded in impairment expense on the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The remaining
balance ($0.8 million) of the CBS Personnel trade name at March 31, 2009 will be amortized over
2.75 years.
Other intangible assets subject to amortization are comprised of the following at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 188,691 | $ | 187,669 | ||||
Technology |
37,959 | 37,959 | ||||||
Trade names, subject to amortization |
25,300 | 24,500 | ||||||
Licensing and non-compete agreements |
4,433 | 4,416 | ||||||
Distributor relations and backlog |
1,380 | 1,380 | ||||||
257,763 | 255,924 | |||||||
Accumulated amortization customer relations |
(36,395 | ) | (32,287 | ) | ||||
Accumulated amortization technology |
(7,631 | ) | (6,388 | ) | ||||
Accumulated amortization trade names, subject to amortization |
(1,939 | ) | (1,531 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
amortization licensing and non-compete agreements |
(2,774 | ) | (2,369 | ) | ||||
Accumulated amortization distributor relations and backlog |
(672 | ) | (630 | ) | ||||
Total accumulated amortization |
(49,411 | ) | (43,205 | ) | ||||
Trade names, not subject to amortization (1) |
26,332 | 36,770 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 234,684 | $ | 249,489 | ||||
(1) | As discussed above, the Companys CBS Personnel trade name was impaired during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
Amortization expense was $6.2 million and $6.1 million during the three-month periods ended March
31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
15
Note H Debt
At March 31, 2009, the Company had $77.5 million outstanding of its Term Loan Facility under its
Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for a Revolving Credit Facility totaling
$340 million which matures in December 2012 and a Term Loan Facility totaling $77.5 million which
matures in December 2013. The Term Loan Facility requires quarterly payments of $0.5 million with
a final payment of the outstanding principal balance due on December 7, 2013. The Credit Agreement
permits the Company to increase, over the next two years, the amount available under the Revolving
Credit Facility by up to $10 million, subject to certain restrictions and Lender approval.
The Company had no outstanding borrowings under its Revolving Credit Facility at March 31, 2009.
The Company had approximately $184.0 million in borrowing base availability under its Revolving
Credit Facility at March 31, 2009. Letters
of credit outstanding at March 31, 2009 totaled approximately $66.0 million. At March 31, 2009,
the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
On January 22, 2008, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap (Swap) agreement
with a bank, fixing the rate of $140 million of Term Loan debt at 7.35% on a like amount of
variable rate Term Loan Facility borrowings. The Swap is designated as a cash flow hedge and is
anticipated to be highly effective.
On February 18, 2009, the Company reduced its debt and repaid at par, from cash on its balance
sheet, $75.0 million of debt under its Term Loan Facility due in December of 2013. In connection
with the repayment, the Company also terminated $70.0 million of its $140.0 million interest rate
swap at a cost of approximately $2.5 million. The Company reclassified this amount from
accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings during the first quarter of 2009. In addition,
the Company expensed $1.1 million of capitalized debt issuance costs in the first quarter of 2009
in connection with the debt repayment.
Both of these amounts are included in Loss on debt repayment in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Note I Fair value measurement
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS No. 157), as of January 1,
2008. SFAS No. 157 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation
used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as
follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets
or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through
market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs
are unobservable inputs based on the Companys own assumptions used to measure assets and
liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is
determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a
recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
Recurring Basis
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
prices in | observable | unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Carrying | active markets | inputs | inputs | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Derivative liability interest rate swap |
$ | 2,596 | $ | | $ | 2,596 | $ | | ||||||||
Supplemental put obligation |
5,252 | | | 5,252 | ||||||||||||
Stock option of minority shareholder (1) |
200 | | | 200 |
(1) | Represents a former employees option to purchase additional common stock in Anodyne. |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
prices in | observable | unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Carrying | active markets | inputs | inputs | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Derivative liability interest rate swap |
$ | 5,242 | $ | | $ | 5,242 | $ | | ||||||||
Supplemental put obligation |
13,411 | | | 13,411 | ||||||||||||
Stock option of minority shareholder |
200 | | 200 | |
16
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of our level 3, supplemental put liability for
the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
$ | 13,411 | ||
Supplemental put expense (reversal) |
(8,159 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 5,252 | ||
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
$ | 21,976 | ||
Supplemental put expense |
2,318 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
$ | 24,294 | ||
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the inputs utilized in connection with the fair value
analysis of the Stock option of minority shareholder were no longer available in publicly quoted
markets. As a result, the inputs were unobservable and the fair value was moved from the Level 2
column to the Level 3 column of the table above. The following is a reconciliation of the change
in the carrying value of Stock option of minority shareholder (in thousands):
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
$ | | ||
Transfer in from Level 2 |
200 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 200 | ||
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a
non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Non-recurring Basis
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted | other | Significant | Gains/(losses) | Gains/(losses) | |||||||||||||||||||||
prices in | observable | unobservable | Three-months | Three-months | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | markets | inputs | inputs | Ended | Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill (1) |
$ | 88,640 | $ | | $ | | $ | 88,640 | $ | (50,000 | ) | $ | |
(1) | Represents the fair value of goodwill at the Staffmark business segment subsequent to the goodwill impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2009. See Note G for further discussion regarding impairment and valuation techniques applied. |
Note J Derivative instruments and hedging activities
On January 22, 2008, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap (Swap) agreement
with a bank, fixing the rate of $140 million at 7.35% on a like amount of variable rate Term Loan
Facility borrowings. The Swap is designated as a cash flow hedge and is anticipated to be highly
effective.
The Companys objective for entering into the Swap is to manage the interest rate exposure on its
Term Loan Facility by fixing its interest rate at 7.35% and avoiding the potential variability of
interest rate fluctuations. The Swap is designated as a cash flow hedge, accordingly, changes in
the fair value of the swap are recorded in stockholders, equity as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, the Company
recorded a $0.1 million gain and a $2.4 million loss to accumulated other comprehensive loss,
respectively.
On February 18, 2009, the Company terminated a portion of its Swap in connection with the repayment
of $75.0 million of the Term Loan Facility. In connection with the termination, the Company
reclassified $2.5 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings. This
reclassification is included in Loss on debt repayment in the Condensed Consolidated
Results of Operations.
17
The following table provides the fair value of the Companys cash flow hedge as well as its
location on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | Balance Sheet | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Location | ||||||||
Liability |
||||||||||
Cash flow hedge current |
$ | 1,509 | $ | 2,691 | Other current liabilities | |||||
Cash flow hedge non-current |
1,087 | 2,551 | Other non-current liabilities | |||||||
Total |
$ | 2,596 | $ | 5,242 | ||||||
Note K Comprehensive income (loss)
The following table sets forth the computation of comprehensive income (loss) for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
Three-months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
$ | (27,318 | ) | $ | (795 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge |
129 | (2,427 | ) | |||||
Reclassification adjustment for cash flow hedge
losses realized in net loss |
2,517 | | ||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
2,646 | (2,427 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive loss |
$ | (24,672 | ) | $ | (3,222 | ) | ||
Note L Stockholders equity
The Trust is authorized to issue 500,000,000 Trust shares and the Company is authorized to issue a
corresponding number of LLC interests. The Company will at all times have the identical number of
LLC interests outstanding as Trust shares. Each Trust share represents an undivided beneficial
interest in the Trust, and each Trust share is entitled to one vote per share on any matter with
respect to which members of the Company are entitled to vote.
| On January 30, 2009, the Company paid a distribution of $0.34 per share to holders of record as of January 23, 2009. | ||
| On April 30, 2009, the Company paid a distribution of $0.34 per share to holders of record as of April 23, 2009. |
In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009, the Company reclassified
non-controlling interest to stockholders equity. SFAS No. 160 was applied prospectively with the
exception of presentation and disclosure requirements which shall be applied retrospectively for
all periods presented.
Note M Warranties
The Companys Fox and Anodyne business segments estimate their exposure to warranty claims based on
both current and historical product sales data and warranty costs incurred. The Company assesses
the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability quarterly and adjusts the amount as necessary.
18
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of the Companys warranty liability for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 is as follows (in
thousands):
Three-months | Year Ended | |||||||
Ended March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 1,541 | $ | 1,023 | ||||
Accrual |
328 | 2,050 | ||||||
Warranty payments |
(294 | ) | (1,532 | ) | ||||
Ending balance |
$ | 1,575 | $ | 1,541 | ||||
Note N Commitments and contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various claims
and legal proceedings. While the ultimate resolution of these matters has yet to be determined,
the Company does not believe that their outcome will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This item 2 contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond
our control. Our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities could differ materially
from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Additional risks of which we
are not currently aware or which we currently deem immaterial could also cause our actual results
to differ, including those discussed in the sections entitled Forward-Looking Statements and
Risk Factors included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report as well as those risk factors discussed
in the section entitled Risk Factors in our annual report
on Form 10-K as amended.
Overview
Compass Diversified Holdings, a Delaware statutory trust, was incorporated in Delaware on November
18, 2005. Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability Company, was also
formed on November 18, 2005. In accordance with the Trust Agreement, the Trust is sole owner of
100% of the Trust Interests (as defined in the LLC Agreement) of the Company and, pursuant to the
LLC Agreement, the Company has outstanding, the identical number of Trust Interests as the number
of outstanding shares of the Trust. The Manager is the sole owner of the Allocation Interests of
the Company. The Company is the operating entity with a board of directors and other corporate
governance responsibilities, similar to that of a Delaware corporation.
The Trust and the Company were formed to acquire and manage a group of small and middle-market
businesses headquartered in North America. We characterize small to middle market businesses as
those that generate annual cash flows of up to $60 million. We focus on companies of this size
because of our belief that these companies are often more able to achieve growth rates above those
of their relevant industries and are also frequently more susceptible to efforts to improve
earnings and cash flow.
In pursuing new acquisitions, we seek businesses with the following characteristics:
| North American base of operations; | ||
| stable and growing earnings and cash flow; | ||
| maintains a significant market share in defensible industry niche (i.e., has a reason to exist); | ||
| solid and proven management team with meaningful incentives; | ||
| low technological and/or product obsolescence risk; and | ||
| a diversified customer and supplier base. |
Our management teams strategy for our subsidiaries involves:
| utilizing structured incentive compensation programs tailored to each business to attract, recruit and retain talented managers to operate our businesses; | ||
| regularly monitoring financial and operational performance, instilling consistent financial discipline, and supporting management in the development and implementation of information systems to effectively achieve these goals; | ||
| assisting management in their analysis and pursuit of prudent organic cash flow growth strategies (both revenue and cost related); | ||
| identifying and working with management to execute attractive external growth and acquisition opportunities; and | ||
| forming strong subsidiary level boards of directors to supplement management in their development and implementation of strategic goals and objectives. |
Based on the experience of our management team and its ability to identify and negotiate
acquisitions, we believe we are positioned to acquire additional attractive businesses. Our
management team has a large network of over 2,000 deal intermediaries to whom it actively markets
and who we expect to expose us to potential acquisitions.
20
Through this network,
as well as our management teams active proprietary transaction sourcing efforts, we typically have
a substantial pipeline of potential acquisition targets. In consummating transactions, our
management team has, in the past, been able to successfully navigate complex situations surrounding
acquisitions, including corporate spin-offs, transitions of family-owned businesses, management
buy-outs and reorganizations. We believe the flexibility, creativity, experience and expertise of
our management team in structuring transactions provides us with a strategic advantage by allowing
us to consider non-traditional and complex transactions tailored to fit a specific acquisition
target.
In addition, because we intend to fund acquisitions through the utilization of our Revolving
Credit Facility, we do not expect to be subject to delays in or conditions by closing
acquisitions that would be typically associated with transaction specific financing, as is
typically the case in such acquisitions. We believe this advantage is a powerful one,
especially in the current credit environment, and is highly unusual in the marketplace for
acquisitions in which we operate.
Areas for focus in 2009
The areas of focus for 2009, which are generally applicable to each of our businesses, include:
| Taking advantage, where possible, of the current economic downturn by growing market share in each of our market niche leading companies at the expense of less well capitalized competitors; | ||
| Achieving sales growth, technological excellence and manufacturing capability through global expansion; | ||
| Continuing to grow through disciplined, strategic acquisitions and rigorous integration processes; | ||
| Aggressively pursuing expense reduction and cost savings through contraction in discretionary spending and capital expenditures, and reductions in workforce and production levels in response to lower production volume; | ||
| Driving free cash flow through increased net income and effective working capital management enabling continued investment in our businesses, strategic acquisitions, and enabling us to return value to our shareholders; and | ||
| Sharply curtailing costs to help counteract the current global economic crisis. |
We do not know when economic conditions may improve, but we believe we are well positioned to fully
participate in a market recovery when it occurs. In the meantime, we continue aggressive efforts to
maximize liquidity and reduce costs and will take additional actions as market conditions warrant.
We are dependent on the earnings of, and cash receipts from, the businesses that we own to meet
our corporate overhead and management fee expenses and to pay distributions. These earnings and
distributions, net of any minority interests in these businesses, will be available:
| First, to meet capital expenditure requirements, management fees and corporate overhead expenses; | ||
| Second, to fund distributions from the businesses to the Company; and | ||
| Third, to be distributed by the Trust to shareholders. |
Results of Operations
We were formed on November 18, 2005 and acquired our existing businesses (segments) as follows:
May 16, 2006 | August 1, 2006 | February 28, 2007 | August 31, 2007 | January 4, 2008 | ||||
Advanced Circuits Staffmark |
Anodyne | HALO | American Furniture | Fox |
21
Consolidated Results of Operations Compass Diversified Holdings and Compass Group Diversified
Holdings LLC
Three months | Three months | |||||||
ended | ended | |||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 274,914 | $ | 351,134 | ||||
Cost of sales |
217,305 | 276,326 | ||||||
Gross profit |
57,609 | 74,808 | ||||||
Staffing, selling, general and administrative expense |
58,695 | 61,753 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
3,072 | 3,651 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense (reversal) |
(8,159 | ) | 2,318 | |||||
Amortization of intangibles |
6,196 | 6,130 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
59,800 | | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (61,995 | ) | $ | 956 | |||
Net sales
The deepening economic recession, the global credit crisis, and eroding consumer confidence all
contributed to a difficult business environment in the first quarter of 2009. Net sales at each of
our businesses suffered as a result of slowing economic growth with the revenues from CBS Personnel
Holdings Inc. (doing business as Staffmark) (Staffmark), our temporary staffing company,
declining significantly in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 2008.
On a consolidated basis, net sales decreased approximately $76.2 million in the three month period
ended March 31, 2009, compared to the corresponding period in 2008. This decrease is principally
due to decreased revenues at Staffmark. Revenues were $73.0 million lower in the first quarter of
2009 compared to the same quarter in 2008 as a result of the weak economic conditions and downward
employment trends experienced during the first three months of 2009. Refer to the following
results of operations by segment for a more detailed analysis of net sales by segment.
We do not generate any revenues apart from those generated by the businesses we own. We may
generate interest income on the investment of available funds, but expect such earnings to be
minimal. Our investment in our businesses is typically in the form of loans from the Company to
such businesses, as well as equity interests in those companies. Cash flows coming to the Trust and
the Company are the result of interest payments on those loans, amortization of those loans and, in
the future, potentially, dividends on our equity ownership. However, on a consolidated basis these
items will be eliminated.
Cost of sales
On a consolidated basis, cost of sales decreased approximately $59.0 million during the three month
period ended March 31, 2009 compared to the corresponding period in 2008. These decreases are due
almost entirely to the corresponding decrease in net sales referred to above. Refer to the
following results of operations by segment for a more detailed analysis of cost of sales.
Staffing, selling, general and administrative expense
On a consolidated basis, staffing, selling, general and administrative expense decreased
approximately $3.1 million during the three month period ended March 31, 2009 compared to the
corresponding period in 2008. This decrease is due principally to cost cutting measures taken at
our individual businesses. Refer to the following results of operations by segment for a more
detailed analysis of staffing, selling, general and administrative expense by segment. At the
corporate level, staffing, selling, general and administrative expense decreased $0.1 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Fees to manager
Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, we pay CGM a quarterly management fee equal to 0.5%
(2.0% annually) of our consolidated adjusted net assets. We accrue for the management fee on a
quarterly basis. For the three-months ended March 31, 2009 we incurred approximately $3.1 million
in expense for these fees compared to $3.7 million for the corresponding period in 2008. The
decrease in management fees in 2009 is attributable to lower assets under management due
principally to the pay down on our Term Loan Facility with available cash in February 2009.
Supplemental put expense (reversal)
Concurrent with the 2006 IPO, we entered into a Supplemental Put Agreement with our Manager
pursuant to which our Manager has the right to cause us to purchase the allocation interests then
owned by them upon termination of the Management Services Agreement. This charge represents that
portion of the estimated increase/decrease in the value of our original businesses over our basis
in those businesses that our Manager is entitled to if the Management Services Agreement were
terminated or those businesses were sold.
22
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we
reversed approximately
$8.2 million in supplemental put expense based on lower valuations attributed to some of our
subsidiaries compared to valuations determined as of December 31, 2008. The change in supplemental
put cost in the three months ended March 31, 2009 is attributable to the decrease in the fair value
of our businesses.
Impairment expense
Based on
the results of our annual impairment tests performed as of March 31, 2009, an indication of
impairment existed at the Staffmark reporting unit. In each of our other businesses (reporting
units) the result of the annual goodwill impairment test indicated that the fair value of the
business exceeded its carrying value. Based on the preliminary results of the second step of the
impairment test, we estimated that the carrying value of Staffmark goodwill exceeded its fair value
by approximately $50.0 million. As a result of this shortfall, we recorded a $50.0 million pretax
goodwill impairment charge for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The results of the annual
impairment tests performed as of April 30, 2008 and 2007 indicated that the fair values of the
reporting units (businesses) exceeded their carrying values and, therefore, goodwill was not
impaired. Accordingly, there were no charges for goodwill impairment in the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
In connection with the annual goodwill impairment we tested other indefinite-lived
intangible assets at our Staffmark reporting unit. As a result of this analysis we
determined that the carrying value exceeded the fair value of the CBS Personnel trade name,
based principally on the discontinuance of the CBS Personnel trade name and rebranding of
the reporting units business to Staffmark beginning in February 2009. During the first
quarter of 2009, we recorded an asset impairment charge of
approximately $9.8 million,
pretax, to decrease the carrying value of the CBS personnel trade name to its fair value.
Results of Operations Our Businesses
As previously discussed, we acquired our businesses on various acquisition dates beginning on
May 16, 2006 (see table above). As a result, our consolidated operating results and discussion
above includes the results of operations since the acquisition date associated with the business.
The following discussion reflects a comparison of the historical and where appropriate, pro-forma
results of operations of our businesses for the three-month period ending March 31, 2009 and March
31, 2008, which we believe is a more meaningful comparison in explaining the comparative financial
performance of our businesses. The following results of operations of our businesses are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year going forward.
Advanced Circuits
Overview
Advanced Circuits is a provider of prototype, quick-turn and volume production printed circuit
boards (PCBs) to customers throughout the United States. Collectively, prototype and quick-turn
PCBs represent approximately two-thirds of Advanced Circuits gross revenues. Prototype and
quick-turn PCBs typically command higher margins than volume production given that customers
require high levels of responsiveness, technical support and timely delivery with respect to
prototype and quick-turn PCBs and are willing to pay a premium for them. Advanced Circuits is able
to meet its customers demands by manufacturing custom PCBs in as little as 24 hours, while
maintaining over 98.0% error-free production rate and real-time customer service and product
tracking 24 hours per day.
While global demand for PCBs has remained strong in recent years, industry wide domestic production
has declined over 50% since 2000. In contrast, over the last several years, Advanced Circuits
revenues have increased steadily as its customers prototype and quick-turn PCB requirements, such
as small quantity orders and rapid turnaround, are less able to be met by low cost volume
manufacturers in Asia and elsewhere. Advanced Circuits management anticipates that demand for its
prototype and quick-turn printed circuit boards will remain strong.
23
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for Advanced Circuits for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 11,988 | $ | 14,284 | ||||
Cost of sales |
5,051 | 6,063 | ||||||
Gross profit |
6,937 | 8,221 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
2,522 | 2,658 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
126 | 126 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
665 | 654 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 3,624 | $ | 4,783 | ||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased approximately $2.3 million over the
corresponding three month period ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in net sales is a result of
decreased sales in long-lead time PCBs ($0.3 million), quick-turn production and prototype PCBs
($1.4 million) and subcontract PCBs ($1.1 million), offset in part by an increase in assembly
revenue ($0.5 million). These decreases are the result of the overall economic slowdown in the
U.S. economy and we expect that net sales for the remainder of fiscal 2009 will track lower than
comparable periods in 2008. Sales from quick-turn and prototype PCBs represented approximately
67% of net sales in 2009 compared to 66.3% in 2008.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased approximately $1.0 million from
the comparable period in 2008. This decrease is principally due to the corresponding decrease in
sales. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased during the three months ended March 31,
2009 (57.9% at March 31, 2009 vs. 57.6% at March 31, 2008) largely as a result of slight decreases
in raw material costs associated with commodity items such as glass, copper and gold.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased $0.1 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 due principally to decreases in employee costs.
Income from operations
Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately $3.6 million, a
decrease of approximately $1.2 million compared to the same period in 2008 principally as a result
of those factors described above.
American Furniture
Overview
Founded in 1998 and headquartered in Ecru, Mississippi, American Furniture is a leading
U.S. manufacturer of upholstered furniture, focused exclusively on the promotional segment of the
furniture industry. American Furniture offers a broad product line of stationary and motion
furniture, including sofas, loveseats, sectionals, recliners and complementary products, sold
primarily at retail price points ranging between $199 and $699. American Furniture is a low-cost
manufacturer and is able to ship any product in its line within 48 hours of receiving an order.
American Furnitures products are adapted from established designs in the following categories:
(i) motion and recliner; (ii) stationary; (iii) occasional chair; and (iv) accent table. American
Furnitures products are manufactured from common components and offer proven select fabric
options, providing manufacturing efficiency and resulting in limited design risk or inventory
obsolescence.
24
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for American Furniture for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 41,504 | $ | 37,180 | ||||
Cost of sales |
33,565 | 28,925 | ||||||
Gross profit |
7,939 | 8,255 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
4,879 | 3,689 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
125 | 125 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
733 | 733 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 2,202 | $ | 3,708 | ||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased approximately $4.3 million over the
corresponding three months ended March 31, 2008. Stationary product sales increased approximately
$4.8 million offset in part by a decrease in motion, recliner and other product sales totaling $0.5
million. The significant increase in stationary product sales is due primarily to the negative
impact that the February 2008 fire had on first quarter 2008 shipments. The softer economy is
responsible for the lower sales volume in the motion and recliner categories.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales increased approximately $4.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the same period of 2008 and is due to the corresponding increase in sales. Gross
profit as a percent of sales was 19.1% in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 22.2%
in the corresponding period in 2008. The decrease in gross profit as a percent of sales of 3.1% in
2009 is principally attributable to greater business interruption insurance proceeds recorded in
the first quarter of 2008, and to a lesser extent, higher raw material prices for product shipped
in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009, increased
approximately $1.2 million compared to the same period of 2008. This increase is primarily due to
the business interruption insurance proceeds recorded during the first quarter of 2008 totaling
$1.8 million. Also contributing to this difference was a decrease of $0.6 million in fuel expense
due to the reduction in fuel prices, together with a reduction in our trucking fleet during the
three months ended March 31, 2009, which was offset in part by an increase in commission expense of
$0.1 million due to the increase in net sales during the quarter.
Income from operations
Income from operations decreased approximately $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008, principally due to the factors described
above.
Anodyne
Overview
Anodyne, with operations headquartered in Coral Springs, Florida, is a leading designer and
manufacturer of medical support surfaces and patient positioning devices serving the acute care,
long-term care and home health care markets.
The Anodyne group of companies includes SenTech Medical Systems (SenTech), AMF Support Surfaces
(AMF), PrimaTech Medical Systems (PrimaTech) and Anatomic Concepts (Anatomic). Anodynes
consolidation of these companies marks the medical support surface industrys first opportunity to
source all leading product technologies from a single vendor.
25
Anodyne develops products both independently and in partnership with large distribution
intermediaries. Medical distribution companies then sell or rent the Anodyne portfolio of products
to one of three end markets: (i) hospitals, (ii) long term care facilities and (iii) home health
care organizations. The level of sophistication largely varies for each product, as some customers
require simple foam surfaces while others may require electronically controlled, low air loss,
lateral rotation, pulmonary therapy or alternating pressure surfaces. The design, engineering and
manufacturing of all products are completed in-house (with the exception of PrimaTech, products,
which are manufactured in Taiwan) and are Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compliant.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for Anodyne for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 11,604 | $ | 11,467 | ||||
Cost of sales |
8,214 | 8,439 | ||||||
Gross profit |
3,390 | 3,028 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
1,787 | 2,114 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
88 | 87 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
371 | 371 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 1,144 | $ | 456 | ||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased approximately $0.1 million over the
corresponding three months ended March 31, 2008. Growth from new product sales of $1.8 million was
substantially offset by overall decreased customer purchases as a result of cutbacks in healthcare
institutional spending.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales decreased approximately $0.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the same period of 2008, resulting from reductions in labor and manufacturing overhead
costs offset in part by higher raw material costs. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 29.2%
in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 26.4% in the corresponding period in 2008.
The increase of 2.8% in 2009 is principally due to labor and manufacturing cost reductions together
with higher selling prices, offset in part by higher raw material costs and an unfavorable sales
mix.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased
approximately $0.3 million compared to the same period of 2008. This decrease is principally the
result of a reduction in costs associated with the Hollywood Capital management services agreement
incurred in 2008. This agreement was terminated in October 2008.
Income from operations
Income from operations increased approximately $0.7 million to $1.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008, due principally to those
factors described above.
Fox Factory
Overview
Founded in 1974 and headquartered in Watsonville, California, Fox is a designer, manufacturer and
marketer of high end suspension products for mountain bikes, all terrain vehicles, snowmobiles and
other off-road vehicles. Fox both acts as a tier
one supplier to leading action sport original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and provides
aftermarket products to retailers and distributors. Foxs products are recognized as the
industrys performance leaders by retailers and end-users alike.
26
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income (loss) from operations data for Fox Factory for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 20,105 | $ | 23,437 | ||||
Cost of sales |
14,879 | 17,941 | ||||||
Gross profit |
5,226 | 5,496 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
4,645 | 3,984 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
126 | 121 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
1,304 | 1,589 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (849 | ) | $ | (198 | ) | ||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased $3.3 million or 14.2% compared to the
corresponding three month period ended March 31, 2008. Sales decreases were due to a decrease in
net sales to OEMs, totaling $3.6 million, offset in part by increases in aftermarket and service
revenues totaling $0.3 million. The OEMs sales decrease is
principally the result of the weak
economic conditions and credit tightening in 2009.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased approximately $3.1 million or
17.1% compared to the corresponding period in 2008. The decrease in cost of sales is primarily
attributable to the decrease in net sales for the same period. Gross profit as a percentage of
sales increased during the three months ended March 31, 2009 (26.0% at March 31, 2009 vs. 23.5% at
March 31, 2008) due to a favorable channel mix as a larger proportion of total net sales were in
the aftermarket category which typically carries higher margins than OEMs and a reduction in
expedited freight cost due to more efficient procurement procedures in 2009 compared to 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased
$0.7 million over the corresponding three month period in 2008. This increase is the result of
increases in engineering, sales and marketing costs to support growth.
Amortization of intangibles
Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased $0.3 million compared to
the corresponding period in 2008. The decrease is attributable to an intangible asset recorded as
part of the purchase price allocation in January 2008 that was fully amortized in 2008.
Loss from operations
Loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased approximately $0.7 million
compared to the corresponding period in 2008 based principally on those factors described above.
27
Halo
Overview
Operating under the brand names of HALO and Lee Wayne, headquartered in Sterling, Illinois, HALO is
an independent provider of customized drop-ship promotional products in the U.S. Through an
extensive group of sales professionals, HALO serves as a one-stop shop for over 40,000 customers
throughout the U.S. HALO is involved in the design, sourcing, management and fulfillment of
promotional products across several product categories, including apparel, calendars, writing
instruments, drink ware and office accessories. HALOs sales professionals work with customers and
vendors to develop the most effective means of communicating a logo or marketing message to a
target audience. Approximately 90% of products sold are drop shipped, resulting in minimal
inventory risk. HALO has established itself as a leader in the promotional products and marketing
industry through its focus on service delivered by its approximately 1,000 account executives.
Distribution of promotional products is seasonal. Typically, HALO expects to realize approximately
45% of its sales and 70% of its operating income in the months of September through December, due
principally to calendar sales and corporate holiday promotions.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for HALO for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008:
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 26,711 | $ | 28,775 | ||||
Cost of sales |
16,972 | 18,410 | ||||||
Gross profit |
9,739 | 10,365 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
11,031 | 10,469 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
125 | 125 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
635 | 546 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (2,052 | ) | $ | (775 | ) | ||
Three-months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three-months ended March 31, 2008.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased approximately $2.1 million compared
to the corresponding three months ended March 31, 2008. Net sales to accounts acquired in
acquisitions made in April and November of 2008, and March of 2009 accounted for approximately $6.8
million of the increase in net sales, which was more than offset by a reduction of approximately
$8.9 million in net sales to existing customers due to the reduction in advertising and
merchandising spending by Halos corporate customers in response to the impact of the current
economic conditions. We expect that this trend will continue through fiscal 2009.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased approximately $1.4 million
compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in cost of sales is primarily attributable to the
decrease in net sales for the same period. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales totaled
approximately 36.5% and 36.0% of net sales for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The increase in gross profit as a percent of sales is the result of a favorable
product sales mix.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased
approximately $0.6 million compared to the same period in 2008. Direct commission expenses
decreased by approximately $0.5 million as a result of decreased sales in 2009 but were more than
offset by an increase of approximately $1.1 million in other general and administrative expense
largely due to increased overhead costs as a result of acquisitions made after March 31, 2008.
Amortization intangibles
Amortization expense increased approximately $0.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. This increase is due principally to additional amortization
costs in 2009 largely due to amortization related to acquisitions made after March 31, 2008.
28
Loss from operations
Loss from operations was approximately $2.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
$0.8 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2008. The increased operating loss in 2009
is principally due to the decrease in sales and higher overhead costs as described above.
Staffmark
Overview
Staffmark (formerly known as CBS Personnel), a provider of temporary staffing services in the
United States, provides a wide range of human resources services, including temporary staffing
services, employee leasing services, permanent staffing and temporary-to-permanent placement
services. Staffmark serves over 6,500 corporate and small business clients and during an average
week places over 25,000 employees in a broad range of industries, including manufacturing,
transportation, retail, distribution, warehousing, automotive supply, and construction, industrial,
healthcare and financial sectors.
Staffmarks business strategy includes maximizing production in existing offices, increasing the
number of offices within a market when conditions warrant, and expanding organically into
contiguous markets where it can benefit from shared management and administrative expenses.
Staffmark typically enters into new markets through acquisition. In keeping with these strategies,
effective January 21, 2008, CBS Personnel acquired all of the ongoing equity interests of Staffmark
Investment LLC and its subsidiaries. This acquisition gave Staffmark a presence in Arkansas,
Tennessee, Colorado, Oklahoma, and Arizona, while significantly increasing its presence in
California, Texas, the Carolinas, New York and the New England area. While no specific acquisitions
are currently contemplated at this time, Staffmark continues to view acquisitions as an attractive
means to enter new geographic markets.
Fiscal 2008 was a very difficult year for the temporary staffing industry. The already-weak
economic conditions and employment trends in the U.S., present at the start of 2008, continued to
worsen as the year progressed and have continued into 2009.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, since the recession began in December of 2007,
5.1 million jobs have been lost with almost two-thirds (3.3 million) of the decrease occurring in
the last 5 months. Temporary staffing has been impacted especially hard, posting 24 consecutive
months of year-over-year declines. The rate of temporary job losses has accelerated, with more than
half of the total decline occurring in the past five months.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for Staffmark for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2009 and the pro-forma income from operations data for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2008, prepared as if Staffmark was acquired on January 1, 2008.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
(pro-forma) | ||||||||
Service revenues |
$ | 163,002 | $ | 267,064 | ||||
Cost of services |
138,626 | 223,045 | ||||||
Gross profit |
24,376 | 44,019 | ||||||
Staffing, selling, general and administrative expense |
31,424 | 41,553 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
210 | 439 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles (a) |
1,213 | 1,339 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
50,000 | | ||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | (58,471 | ) | $ | 688 | |||
(a) | An increase in amortization of intangible assets totaling $0.3 million in 2008 reflecting increased amortization expense as a result of, and derived from, the purchase price allocation in connection with the Staffmark acquisition in January 2008. |
29
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to pro-forma three months ended March 31, 2008.
Service revenues
Service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased $104.1 million over the
corresponding three months ended March 31, 2008. This reduction in revenues reflects reduced demand
for temporary staffing services (primarily clerical and light industrial) as a result of the
significant downturn in the economy. Approximately $2.0 million of the decrease is related to
reduced revenues for permanent staffing services as clients were affected by weaker economic
conditions. Until we witness sustained temporary staffing job creation and signs of a strengthening
global economy, we expect to continue to experience depressed revenues, through fiscal 2009.
Cost of revenues
Direct cost of service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased approximately
$84.4 million compared to the same period a year ago. This decrease is principally the direct
result of the decrease in service revenues. Gross profit as a percent of service revenue was
approximately 15.0% and 16.5% of revenues for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The majority of the decrease in the gross profit margin is the result of
reduced permanent staffing services in 2009, which carries a higher profit margin. Additionally,
Staffmark is facing downward pricing pressure based on client demand brought on by current economic
conditions.
Staffing, selling, general and administrative expense
Staffing, selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009
decreased approximately $10.1 million compared to the same period a year ago. Management has taken
measures to reduce overhead costs, consolidate facilities and close unprofitable branches in order
to mitigate the negative impact of the current weak economic environment. This cost reduction
program will continue through fiscal 2009. In addition, approximately $1.7 million in costs
incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2009 are one-time, non-recurring expenses related
to the integration of the Staffmark and CBS Personnel operations and restructuring of the
organization.
Fees to Manager
Fees to manager decreased approximately $0.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008 due to the reduction in sales and operating profit in 2009
compared to 2008.
Impairment expense
Based on the preliminary results of our annual goodwill impairment test performed as of March 31,
2009, an indication of goodwill impairment existed. Based on the preliminary results of the second
step of the goodwill impairment test, we estimated that the carrying
amount of Staffmark goodwill exceeded
its fair value by approximately $50.0 million. Therefore, we recorded a $50.0 million pretax
goodwill impairment charge for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The carrying amount of
goodwill exceeded the fair value due to the recent and projected, significant decrease in revenue
and operating profit at Staffmark resulting from the negative impact on temporary staffing and
permanent placement revenues due to the depressed macroeconomic conditions and downward employment
trends. We currently expect to finalize the goodwill impairment analysis during the second quarter
of fiscal 2009. Any adjustments to our preliminary estimate of impairment as a result of
completion of this evaluation are currently expected to be recorded in our consolidated financial
statements for the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Income (loss) from operations
Income (loss) from operations decreased approximately $59.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008, based principally on the factors
described above.
30
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the three-months ended March 31, 2009, on a consolidated basis, cash flows provided by
operating activities totaled approximately $25.9 million, which represents a $4.3 million decrease
in cash provided by operations compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 and is the
result of the reduction in sales and operating profits of our businesses. Consolidated net loss,
adjusted for non-cash activity decreased approximately $12.0 million in the first quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was offset in part by cash provided by net
positive changes to operating assets and liabilities of $7.7 million during this same period. The
decline in consolidated net sales, production levels and operating profit due to the current
depressed economic environment all contributed to these variances.
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled approximately $2.4 million, which reflects
maintenance capital expenditures of approximately $1.1 million and costs associated with an add-on
acquisition at Halo totaling approximately $1.3 million.
Cash flows used in financing activities totaled approximately $88.5 million, principally
reflecting: (i) distributions paid to shareholders during the quarter totaling approximately $10.7
million; (ii) scheduled amortization of our Term Loan Facility of $0.5; and (iii) repayment of our
Term Loan Facility of $75.0 million together with $2.5 million in cancellation fees paid for
terminating that portion of an interest rate swap connected to the Term Loan Facility repaid.
At March 31, 2009 we had approximately $32.4 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand. The
majority of our cash is invested in short-term U.S. government securities and corporate debt
securities and is maintained in accordance with the Companys investment policy, which identifies
allowable investments and specifies credit quality standards. The primary objective of our
investment activities is the preservation of principal while maximizing interest income and
minimizing risk. We do not hold any investments for trading purposes.
We had the following outstanding loans due from each of our businesses:
| Advanced Circuits approximately $57.5 million; | |
| American Furniture approximately $68.8 million; | |
| Anodyne approximately $18.9 million; | |
| Staffmark approximately $92.3 million; | |
| Fox Factory approximately $49.1 million; and | |
| HALO approximately $47.1 million. |
Each loan has a scheduled maturity and each business is entitled to repay all or a portion of the
principal amount of the outstanding loans, without penalty, prior to maturity.
In April 2009 we amended the Staffmark inter-company credit agreement with us which, among other
things, recapitalized a portion of Staffmarks long-term debt by exchanging $35.0 million of the
debt for common stock.
Our primary source of cash is from the receipt of interest and principal on our outstanding loans
to our businesses. Accordingly, we are dependent upon the earnings of and cash flow from these
businesses, which are available for (i) operating expenses; (ii) payment of principal and interest
under our Credit Agreement; (iii) payments to CGM due or potentially due pursuant to the Management
Services Agreement, the LLC Agreement, and the Supplemental Put Agreement; (iv) cash distributions
to our shareholders; and (v) investments in future acquisitions. Payments made under (iii) above
are required to be paid before distributions to shareholders and may be significant and exceed the
funds held by us, which may require us to dispose of assets or incur debt to fund such
expenditures.
We reversed non-cash charges to earnings of approximately $8.2 million during the three-months
ended March 31, 2009 in order to recognize a reduction in our estimated liability in connection
with the Supplemental Put Agreement between us and CGM. A non-current liability of approximately
$5.3 million is reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheet, which represents our
estimated liability for this obligation at March 31, 2009.
We believe that we currently have sufficient liquidity and resources to meet our existing
obligations, including quarterly distributions to our shareholders, as approved by our Board of
Directors, over the next twelve months. We have considered the impact of recent market
instability and credit availability in assessing the adequacy of our liquidity and capital
resources.
31
Our Credit Agreement provides for a Revolving Credit Facility totaling $340 million which matures
in December 2012 and a Term Loan Facility totaling $77.5 million, which matures in December 2013.
At March 31, 2009 we had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility portion of
our Credit Agreement. At March 31, 2009 we had $77.5 million outstanding under the Term Loan
Facility portion of our Credit Agreement. We repaid $75.0 million of the outstanding Term Loan
Facility on February 23, 2009. The Term Loan Facility requires quarterly payments of $0.5 million
which commenced March 31, 2007, with a final payment of the outstanding principal balance due on
December 7, 2013. The Credit Agreement permits the Company to increase, over the next two years,
the amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility by up to $10 million, subject to certain
restrictions and Lender approval.
We had
approximately $184 million in borrowing base availability under
our Revolving Credit Facility at March 31,
2009. Letters of Credit totaling $66.0 million were outstanding at March 31, 2009. We currently
have no exposure to failed financial institutions.
On January 22, 2008 we entered into a three-year interest rate swap agreement with a bank, fixing
the rate of $140 million at 7.35% on a like amount of variable rate Term Loan Facility borrowings.
The interest rate swap was intended to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates and
effectively converts $140 million of our floating-rate Term Facility Debt to a fixed- rate basis
for a period of three years. In February 2009 we repaid $75.0 million of our Term Loan and as a
result terminated $70 million of the outstanding interest rate swap. In connection with this debt
repayment we reclassified $2.5 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings and
expensed $1.1 million of capitalized debt issuance costs, during the three months ended March 31,
2009.
We intend to use the availability under our Credit Agreement and cash on hand to pursue
acquisitions of additional businesses to the extent permitted under our Credit Agreement, to fund
distributions and to provide for other working capital needs.
32
The table below details cash receipts and payments that are not reflected on our income statement
in order to provide an additional measure of managements estimate of cash flow available for
distribution and reinvestment (CAD). CAD is a non-GAAP measure that we believe provides
additional information to evaluate our ability to make anticipated quarterly distributions. It is
not necessarily comparable with similar measures provided by other entities. We believe that CAD
and cash available from our businesses (net of reserves) will be sufficient to meet our anticipated
distributions over the next twelve months. The table below reconciles CAD to net income and to cash
flow provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable
financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Three months | Three months | |||||||
Ended | ended | |||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2009 | March 31, 2008 | ||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
$ | (27,318 | ) | $ | (795 | ) | ||
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,400 | 9,191 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense (reversal) |
(8,159 | ) | 2,318 | |||||
Noncontrolling stockholder charges and other |
840 | 525 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
(14,915 | ) | (290 | ) | ||||
Deferred taxes |
(24,780 | ) | (1,445 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
470 | 486 | ||||||
Loss on debt repayment |
3,652 | | ||||||
Impairment expense |
59,800 | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
27,834 | 20,170 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
25,824 | 30,160 | ||||||
Add (deduct): |
||||||||
Unused fee on revolving credit facility (1) |
855 | 729 | ||||||
Staffmark integration and restructuring |
1,891 | 1,575 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(27,834 | ) | (20,170 | ) | ||||
Less: |
||||||||
Maintenance capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Advanced Circuits |
34 | 457 | ||||||
Aeroglide |
| 84 | ||||||
American Furniture |
378 | 43 | ||||||
Anodyne |
104 | 154 | ||||||
Staffmark |
362 | 669 | ||||||
Fox |
19 | 686 | ||||||
Halo |
217 | 242 | ||||||
Silvue |
| 81 | ||||||
Estimated cash flow available for distribution |
$ | (378 | ) | $ | 9,878 | |||
Distribution paid April 2009 and 2008 |
$ | 10,719 | $ | 10,246 | ||||
(1) | Represents the commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. |
Cash flows of certain of our businesses are seasonal in nature. Cash flows from Staffmark are
typically lower in the first quarter of each year than in other quarters due to: (i) reduced
seasonal demand for temporary staffing services and (ii) lower gross margins earned during that
period due to the front-end loading of certain payroll taxes and other costs associated with
payroll paid to our employees. Cash flows from HALO are typically highest in the months of
September through December of each year primarily as the result of calendar sales and holiday
promotions. HALO generates approximately two-thirds of its operating income in the months of
September through December.
33
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no special purpose entities or off balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases
entered into in the ordinary course of business.
Long-term contractual obligations, except for our long-term debt obligations, are generally not
recognized in our consolidated balance sheet. Non-cancelable purchase obligations are obligations
we incur during the normal course of business, based on projected needs.
The table below summarizes the payment schedule of our contractual obligations at March 31, 2009:
More than | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations (1) |
$ | 118,820 | $ | 10,988 | $ | 21,674 | $ | 86,159 | $ | | ||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
1,316 | 485 | 453 | 378 | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (2) |
52,347 | 13,401 | 18,493 | 9,650 | 10,803 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (3) |
124,351 | 72,420 | 27,617 | 24,314 | | |||||||||||||||
Supplemental put obligation (4) |
5,252 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
$ | 302,086 | $ | 97,294 | $ | 68,237 | $ | 120,501 | $ | 10,803 | |||||||||||
(1) | Reflects commitment fees and letter of credit fees under our Revolving Credit Facility and amounts due, together with interest on our Term Loan Facility. | |
(2) | Reflects various operating leases for office space, manufacturing facilities and equipment from third parties with various lease terms running from one to fourteen years. | |
(3) | Reflects non-cancelable commitments as of March 31, 2009, including: (i) shareholder distributions of $42.9 million, (ii) management fees of $12.1 million per year over the next five years and, (iii) other obligations, including amounts due under employment agreements. Distributions to our shareholders are approved by our Board of Directors each quarter. The amount ultimately approved as future quarterly distributions may differ from the amount included in this schedule. | |
(4) | The supplemental put obligation represents the long-term portion of an estimated liability, accrued as if our management services agreement with CGM had been terminated. This agreement has not been terminated and there is no basis upon which to determine a date in the future, if any, that this amount will be paid. |
The table does not include the long-term portion of the actuarially developed reserve for workers
compensation, included as a component of long-term liabilities, which does not provide for annual
estimated payments beyond one year.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to adopt
accounting policies and make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates
under different assumptions and judgments and uncertainties, and potentially could result in
materially different results under different conditions. These critical accounting estimates are
reviewed periodically by our independent auditors and the audit committee of our board of
directors.
Our critical accounting estimates have not changed materially from those disclosed in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC with the exception
of our goodwill and intangible asset impairment testing described below.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived, intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired.
Trade names are considered to be indefinite lived intangibles. Goodwill and trade names are not
amortized, however we are required to perform impairment reviews at least annually and more
frequently in certain circumstances.
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which requires management to make judgments in
determining certain assumptions used in the calculation. The first step of the process consists of
estimating the fair value of each of our reporting units based on a discounted cash flow model
using revenue and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair values with the carrying
values, which include allocated goodwill. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying
value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by determining an
implied fair value of goodwill.
34
The determination of a reporting units implied fair value of goodwill requires the allocation of the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.
Any unallocated fair value represents the implied fair value of goodwill, which is then compared
to its corresponding carrying value. The impairment test for trademarks requires the determination
of the fair value of such assets. If the fair value of the trademark is less than its carrying
value, an impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to the difference. We cannot
predict the occurrence of certain future events that might adversely affect the reported value of
goodwill and/or intangible assets. Such events include, but are not limited to, strategic
decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the impact of the economic
environment on our customer base, and material adverse effects in relationships with significant
customers.
Goodwill impairment
We completed our annual goodwill impairment testing in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142) as of March 31, 2009. This annual impairment test
involved a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involved comparing the fair
values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill.
The Company determined the fair value of its reporting units utilizing a combination of the income
approach methodology of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method and market
comparison to comparable peer companies. Each of our reporting units passed the impairment
testing, with the exception of Staffmark. The carrying amount of Staffmark exceeded its fair value
due to the recent and projected, significant decrease in revenue and operating profit at Staffmark
resulting from the negative impact on temporary staffing and permanent placement revenues due to
macroeconomic conditions and downward employment trends. As such, we performed the second step of
the goodwill impairment test in accordance with SFAS No. 142 in order to determine the amount of
impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involved comparing the implied
fair value of Staffmarks goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill. This comparison
resulted in a goodwill impairment charge of approximately $50.0 million, which was recorded in
impairment expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
The goodwill impairment charge reflects the preliminary indication from the impairment analysis
performed to date and is subject to finalization of certain fair value estimates being performed
and may be adjusted when all aspects of the analysis are completed. The goodwill impairment
analysis involves calculating the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill by allocating
the fair value of Staffmark to all assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including both
recognized and unrecognized intangible assets) and comparing the residual amount to the carrying
value of goodwill. We expect to finalize the goodwill impairment analysis of Staffmark during the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. Any adjustments to the preliminary estimate of impairment as a
result of completion of this evaluation are currently expected to be recorded in our consolidated
financial statements during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The goodwill impairment charge does
not have any adverse effect on the covenant calculations or compliance under our Credit Agreement.
Impairment of the CBS Personnel trade name
In connection with the annual goodwill impairment testing, we tested other indefinite-lived
intangible assets at our Staffmark reporting unit. As a result of this analysis we determined
that the carrying value exceeded the fair value of the CBS Personnel trade name (an
indefinite-lived asset), based principally on the discontinuance of the CBS Personnel trade name
and rebranding of the reporting unit to Staffmark in February 2009. The fair value of the CBS
Personnel trade name was determined by applying the relief from royalty technique to forecasted
revenues at the Staffmark reporting unit. The result of this analysis indicated that the carrying
value of the trade name ($10.6 million) exceeded its fair value ($0.8 million) by approximately
$9.8 million. Therefore, an impairment charge of $9.8 million is recorded in impairment expense on
the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
remaining balance $(0.8 million) of the CBS Personnel trade name at March 31, 2009 will be
amortized over 2.75 years.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities
Assumed in a Business Combination (FSP FAS 141(R)-1), which amends the guidance in SFAS 141
(revised), Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) for the initial recognition and measurement,
subsequent measurement, and disclosures of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a
business combination. In addition, FSP FAS 141(R)-1 amends the existing guidance related to
accounting for pre-existing contingent consideration assumed as part of the business combination.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 is effective for us on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141R and FSP FAS
141(R)-1 did not have a significant impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
However, any business combinations entered into in the future may
impact our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements as a result of the potential earnings volatility due to the changes described above.
35
The FASB issued the following new accounting standards on April 9, 2009. We plan to adopt each
standard in the second quarter of 2009, and do not expect that our adoption of any of these
standards will have a material impact on our financial statements.
FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
(FSP No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2)
FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 modifies the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt
securities through increased consistency in the timing of impairment recognition and enhanced
disclosures related to the credit and noncredit components of impaired debt securities that are not
expected to be sold. In addition, increased disclosures are required for both debt and equity
securities regarding expected cash flows, credit losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized
losses. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 will be effective for interim and annual reporting
periods that end after June 15, 2009, which, for us, would be our 2009 second quarter.
FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1)
FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 requires fair value disclosures for financial
instruments that are not reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.
Prior to the issuance of FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, the fair values of those
assets and liabilities were disclosed only once each year. With the issuance of FSP FAS No. 107-1
and APB Opinion No. 28-1, we will now be required to disclose this information on a quarterly
basis, providing quantitative and qualitative information about fair value estimates for all
financial instruments not measured in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. FSP
FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1 will be effective for interim reporting periods that end
after June 15, 2009, which, for us, would be our 2009 second quarter.
FSP FAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS
No. 157-4)
FSP FAS No. 157-4 clarifies the methodology used to determine fair value when there is no active
market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. FSP FAS No. 157-4 also
reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, as stated in FAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which is to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction.
It also reaffirms the need to use judgment to determine if a formerly active market has become
inactive, as well as to determine fair values when markets have become inactive. FSP FAS No. 157-4
will be applied prospectively and will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, which, for us, would be our 2009 second quarter.
36
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk required by this item are
incorporated by reference to Item 7A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K as amended for the year ended December
31, 2008 and have not materially changed since that report was filed.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), the Holdings Regular Trustees and the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of Holdings and the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of March 31, 2009. Based on that
evaluation, the Regular Trustees of Holdings and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company concluded that Holdings and the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of March 31, 2009.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d), Holdings Regular
Trustees and the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, concluded that no changes in Holdings or the Companys internal control
over financial reporting occurred during the first quarter of 2009 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Holdings and the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
37
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Legal proceedings associated with the Companys and Holdings business together with legal
proceedings for the initial businesses have not changed materially from those disclosed in Part I,
Item 3 of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended as
filed with the SEC on April 9, 2009.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk factors and uncertainties associated with the Companys and Holdings business have not
changed materially from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A
of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended as filed with the
SEC on April 9, 2009.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description | |
18.1
|
Preferability letter provided by Grant Thornton LLP, our registered public accounting firm to change our measurement date in connection with our annual goodwill impairment test | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant | |
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant | |
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS |
||||
By: | /s/ James J. Bottiglieri | |||
James J. Bottiglieri | ||||
Regular Trustee | ||||
Date: May 8, 2009
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC |
||||
By: | /s/ James J. Bottiglieri | |||
James J. Bottiglieri | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||||
Date: May 8, 2009
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
18.1
|
Preferability letter provided by Grant Thornton LLP, our registered public accounting firm to change our measurement date in connection with our annual goodwill impairment test | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant | |
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant | |
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
41