Compass Diversified Holdings - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
0-51937 (Commission file number) |
57-6218917 (I.R.S. employer identification number) |
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
0-51938 (Commission file number) |
20-3812051 (I.R.S. employer identification number) |
Sixty One Wilton Road
Second Floor
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 221-1703
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Second Floor
Westport, CT 06880
(203) 221-1703
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller Reporting Company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May 1, 2011, there were 46,725,000 shares of Compass Diversified Holdings outstanding.
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the period ended March 31, 2011
For the period ended March 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
Number | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
NOTE TO READER
In reading this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to:
| the Trust and Holdings refer to Compass Diversified Holdings; | ||
| businesses, operating segments, subsidiaries and reporting units refer to, collectively, the businesses controlled by the Company; | ||
| the Company refer to Compass Group Diversified Holdings LLC; | ||
| the Manager refer to Compass Group Management LLC (CGM); | ||
| the initial businesses refer to, collectively, Staffmark Holdings, Inc. (Staffmark), Crosman Acquisition Corporation, Compass AC Holdings, Inc. and Silvue Technologies Group, Inc.; | ||
| the 2010 acquisitions refer to, collectively, the acquisitions of Liberty Safe and Security Products, LLC and ERGObaby Carrier, Inc.; | ||
| the Trust Agreement refer to the amended and restated Trust Agreement of the Trust dated as of December 21, 2007; | ||
| the Credit Agreement refer to the Credit Agreement with a group of lenders led by Madison Capital, LLC which provides for a Revolving Credit Facility and a Term Loan Facility; | ||
| the Revolving Credit Facility refer to the $340 million Revolving Credit Facility provided by the Credit Agreement that matures in December 2012; | ||
| the Term Loan Facility refer to the $73.5 million Term Loan Facility, as of March 31, 2011, provided by the Credit Agreement that matures in December 2013; | ||
| the LLC Agreement refer to the second amended and restated operating agreement of the Company dated as of January 9, 2007; and | ||
| we, us and our refer to the Trust, the Company and the businesses together. |
3
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, contains both historical and forward-looking statements.
We may, in some cases, use words such as project, predict, believe, anticipate, plan,
expect, estimate, intend, should, would, could, potentially, or may, or other words
that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including, among other things:
| our ability to successfully operate our businesses on a combined basis, and to effectively integrate and improve future acquisitions; | ||
| our ability to remove CGM and CGMs right to resign; | ||
| our organizational structure, which may limit our ability to meet our dividend and distribution policy; | ||
| our ability to service and comply with the terms of our indebtedness; | ||
| our cash flow available for distribution and reinvestment and our ability to make distributions in the future to our shareholders; | ||
| our ability to pay the management fee, profit allocation when due and to pay the supplemental put price if and when due; | ||
| our ability to make and finance future acquisitions; | ||
| our ability to implement our acquisition and management strategies; | ||
| the regulatory environment in which our businesses operate; | ||
| trends in the industries in which our businesses operate; | ||
| changes in general economic or business conditions or economic or demographic trends in the United States and other countries in which we have a presence, including changes in interest rates and inflation; | ||
| environmental risks affecting the business or operations of our businesses; | ||
| our and CGMs ability to retain or replace qualified employees of our businesses and CGM; | ||
| costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims; and | ||
| extraordinary or force majeure events affecting the business or operations of our businesses. |
Our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities could differ materially from those
expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Additional risks of which we are not
currently aware or which we currently deem immaterial could also cause our actual results to
differ.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on
any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking events discussed in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q may not occur. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Quarterly
Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to
reflect subsequent events or circumstances, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise, except as required by law.
4
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 17,120 | $ | 13,536 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $4,554 at March 31, 2011
and $5,481 at December 31, 2010 |
204,237 | 208,487 | ||||||
Inventories |
77,831 | 77,412 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
29,343 | 33,904 | ||||||
Total current assets |
328,531 | 333,339 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
35,407 | 33,484 | ||||||
Goodwill |
319,766 | 325,851 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
260,099 | 269,672 | ||||||
Deferred debt issuance costs, less accumulated amortization of
$7,341 at March 31, 2011 and $6,882 at December 31, 2010 |
3,389 | 3,822 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
23,861 | 17,873 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 971,053 | $ | 984,041 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 53,199 | $ | 53,197 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
95,412 | 74,302 | ||||||
Due to related party |
3,380 | 2,692 | ||||||
Distribution payable |
16,821 | | ||||||
Current portion of supplemental put obligation |
6,300 | | ||||||
Current portion, long-term debt |
2,000 | 2,000 | ||||||
Current portion of workers compensation liability |
17,943 | 18,170 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
689 | 1,043 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
195,744 | 151,404 | ||||||
Supplemental put obligation |
41,526 | 44,598 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
73,606 | 74,457 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
78,500 | 94,000 | ||||||
Workers compensation liability |
40,902 | 40,588 | ||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
2,534 | 3,084 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
432,812 | 408,131 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Trust shares, no par value, 500,000 authorized; 46,725 shares issued
and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
638,759 | 638,763 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (143 | ) | |||||
Accumulated deficit |
(190,232 | ) | (150,550 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity attributable to Holdings |
448,527 | 488,070 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
89,714 | 87,840 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
538,241 | 575,910 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 971,053 | $ | 984,041 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 177,326 | $ | 136,218 | ||||
Service revenues |
246,799 | 217,401 | ||||||
Total revenues |
424,125 | 353,619 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
119,687 | 94,067 | ||||||
Cost of services |
214,850 | 188,526 | ||||||
Gross profit |
89,588 | 71,026 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Staffing expense |
22,115 | 19,607 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
46,397 | 42,381 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense |
3,228 | 14,426 | ||||||
Management fees |
3,843 | 3,664 | ||||||
Amortization expense |
7,702 | 6,123 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
7,700 | | ||||||
Operating loss |
(1,397 | ) | (15,175 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest income |
2 | 15 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(2,539 | ) | (2,701 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
(459 | ) | (418 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense), net |
246 | 180 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(4,147 | ) | (18,099 | ) | ||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
2,420 | (2,812 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
(6,567 | ) | (15,287 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
407 | 682 | ||||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
$ | (6,974 | ) | $ | (15,969 | ) | ||
Basic and fully diluted loss per share attributable to Holdings |
||||||||
$ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | |||
Weighted average number of shares of trust stock outstanding basic and fully
diluted |
46,725 | 36,625 | ||||||
Cash distributions declared per share |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Equity | Non- | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Attributable | Controlling | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Shares | Amount | Deficit | Loss | to Holdings | Interest | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2011 |
46,725 | $ | 638,763 | $ | (150,550 | ) | $ | (143 | ) | $ | 488,070 | $ | 87,840 | $ | 575,910 | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | (6,974 | ) | | (6,974 | ) | 407 | (6,567 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income cash flow hedge gain |
| | | 143 | 143 | | 143 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
| | (6,974 | ) | 143 | (6,831 | ) | 407 | (6,424 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Offering costs from the issuance of Trust Shares in 2010 |
| (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Option activity attributable to noncontrolling interest holders |
| | | | | 1,467 | 1,467 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared and unpaid |
| | (16,821 | ) | | (16,821 | ) | | (16,821 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions paid |
| | (15,887 | ) | | (15,887 | ) | | (15,887 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance March 31, 2011 |
46,725 | $ | 638,759 | $ | (190,232 | ) | $ | | $ | 448,527 | $ | 89,714 | $ | 538,241 | ||||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
Compass Diversified Holdings
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (6,567 | ) | $ | (15,287 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation expense |
2,427 | 1,882 | ||||||
Amortization expense |
7,887 | 6,123 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
7,700 | | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
459 | 418 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense |
3,228 | 14,426 | ||||||
Noncontrolling stockholder charges and other |
852 | 4,370 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
(993 | ) | (2,121 | ) | ||||
Other |
292 | (210 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: |
||||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
5,041 | 310 | ||||||
Increase in inventories |
(654 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(3,302 | ) | (724 | ) | ||||
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
23,388 | 7,241 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
39,758 | 16,379 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
| (83,708 | ) | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(4,565 | ) | (964 | ) | ||||
Other investing activities |
62 | 14 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(4,503 | ) | (84,658 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Borrowings under Credit Agreement |
| 71,500 | ||||||
Repayments under Credit Agreement |
(15,500 | ) | (2,000 | ) | ||||
Distributions paid |
(15,887 | ) | (12,452 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds provided by noncontrolling interest |
| 2,085 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
| (155 | ) | |||||
Other |
(284 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(31,671 | ) | 58,928 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
3,584 | (9,351 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
13,536 | 31,495 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 17,120 | $ | 22,144 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow disclosure of financing activities: |
||||||||
Dividends declared but not yet paid |
$ | 16,821 | $ | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
Compass Diversified Holdings
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
March 31, 2011
March 31, 2011
Note A Organization and business operations
Compass Diversified Holdings, a Delaware statutory trust (Holdings), was organized in Delaware on
November 18, 2005. Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(the Company), was also formed on November 18, 2005. Compass Group Management LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (CGM or the Manager), was the sole owner of 100% of the Interests of
the Company as defined in the Companys operating agreement, dated as of November 18, 2005, which
were subsequently reclassified as the Allocation Interests pursuant to the Companys amended and
restated operating agreement, dated as of April 25, 2006 (as amended and restated, the LLC
Agreement).
The Company is a controlling owner of eight businesses, or operating segments, at March 31, 2011.
The operating segments are as follows: Compass AC Holdings, Inc. (ACI or Advanced Circuits),
AFM Holdings Corporation (AFM or American Furniture), The ERGO Baby Carrier, Inc.
(ERGObaby), Fox Factory, Inc. (Fox), HALO Lee Wayne LLC (HALO), Liberty Safe and Security
Products, LLC (Liberty Safe or Liberty), Staffmark Holdings, Inc. (Staffmark), and Tridien
Medical (Tridien). Refer to Note D for further discussion of the operating segments.
Note B Presentation and principles of consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011
and March 31, 2010, are unaudited, and in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Such
adjustments consist solely of normal recurring items. Interim results are not necessarily
indicative of results for a full year or any subsequent interim period. The condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and presented as permitted by Form 10-Q and
do not contain certain information included in the annual consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes of the Company. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Seasonality
Earnings of certain of the Companys operating segments are seasonal in nature. Earnings from AFM
are typically highest in the months of January through April of each year, coinciding with
homeowners tax refunds. Earnings from Staffmark are typically lower in the first quarter of each
year than in other quarters due to reduced seasonal demand for temporary staffing services and to
lower gross margins during that period associated with the front-end loading of certain payroll
taxes associated with payroll paid to its employees. Earnings from HALO are typically highest in
the months of September through December of each year primarily as the result of calendar sales
and holiday promotions. HALO generates approximately two-thirds of its operating income in the
months of September through December. Revenue and earnings from Fox are typically highest in the
third quarter, coinciding with the delivery of product for the new bike year.
Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and all majority
owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Note C Recent accounting pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance to enhance disclosure requirements related to
fair value measurements. The amended guidance for Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements was
effective for the Company January 1, 2010. The amended guidance for Level 3 fair value measurements
was effective for the Company January 1, 2011. The guidance requires disclosures of amounts and
reasons for transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 recurring fair value measurements as well
as additional information related to activities in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value
measurements. The guidance expanded the disclosures related to the level of disaggregation of
assets and liabilities and information about inputs and valuation techniques. The adoption of this
amended guidance did not have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance for performing goodwill impairment tests, which
was effective for the Company January 1, 2011. The amended guidance requires reporting units with
zero or negative carrying amounts to be
9
Table of Contents
assessed to determine if it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. As part of
this assessment, entities should consider all qualitative factors that could impact the carrying
value. The adoption of this amended guidance did not have a significant impact on the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Note D Operating segment data
At March 31, 2011, the Company had eight reportable operating segments. Each operating segment
represents an acquisition. The Companys operating segments are strategic business units that
offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each business requires
different technology and marketing strategies. A description of each of the reportable segments
and the types of products and services from which each segment derives its revenues is as follows:
| Advanced Circuits, an electronic components manufacturing company, is a provider of prototype, quick-turn and production rigid printed circuit boards. ACI manufactures and delivers custom printed circuit boards to customers mainly in North America. ACI is headquartered in Aurora, Colorado. | ||
| American Furniture is a leading domestic manufacturer of upholstered furniture for the promotional segment of the marketplace. AFM offers a broad product line of stationary and motion furniture, including sofas, loveseats, sectionals, recliners and complementary products, sold primarily at retail price points ranging between $199 and $1,399. AFM is a low-cost manufacturer and is able to ship any product in its line within 48 hours of receiving an order. AFM is headquartered in Ecru, Mississippi and its products are sold in the United States. | ||
| ERGObaby is a premier designer, marketer and distributor of babywearing products and accessories. ERGObabys reputation for product innovation, reliability and safety has led to numerous awards and accolades from consumer surveys and publications. ERGObaby offers a broad range of wearable baby carriers and related products that are sold through more than 900 retailers and web shops in the United States and internationally. ERGObaby is headquartered in Pukalani, Hawaii. | ||
| Fox is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of high end suspension products for mountain bikes, all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles and other off-road vehicles. Fox acts as both a tier one supplier to leading action sport original equipment manufacturers and provides after-market products to retailers and distributors. Fox is headquartered in Watsonville, California and its products are sold worldwide. | ||
| HALO serves as a one-stop shop for approximately 40,000 customers providing design, sourcing, and management and fulfillment services across all categories of its customer promotional product needs. HALO has established itself as a leader in the promotional products and marketing industry through its focus on service through its approximately 870 account executives. HALO is headquartered in Sterling, Illinois. | ||
| Liberty Safe is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of premium home and gun safes in North America. From its over 200,000 square foot manufacturing facility, Liberty produces a wide range of home and gun safe models in a broad assortment of sizes, features and styles. Liberty is headquartered in Payson, Utah. | ||
| Staffmark, a national provider of contingent workforce solutions that serves the temporary staffing needs of employers throughout the United States, provides a full spectrum of light industrial and clerical staffing solutions. Staffmark is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. | ||
| Tridien is a leading designer and manufacturer of powered and non-powered medical therapeutic support surfaces and patient positioning devices serving the acute care, long-term care and home health care markets. Tridien is headquartered in Coral Springs, Florida and its products are sold primarily in North America. |
The tabular information that follows shows data of each of the operating segments reconciled to
amounts reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The operations of each of
the operating segments are included in consolidated operating results as of their date of
acquisition. Revenues from geographic locations outside the United States were not material for
any operating segment, except Fox and ERGObaby, in each of the periods presented below. Fox
recorded net sales to locations outside the United States, principally Europe and Asia, of $27.9
million and $21.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Of
the Asian sales, sales to Taiwan totaled $8.6 million and $8.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. ERGObaby recorded net sales to locations outside the
United States of $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. There were no
significant inter-segment transactions.
10
Table of Contents
Segment profit is determined based on internal performance measures used by the Chief Executive
Officer to assess the performance of each business. Segment profit excludes certain charges from
the acquisitions of the Companys initial businesses not pushed down to the segments which are
reflected in Corporate and other. A disaggregation of the Companys consolidated revenue and
other financial data for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is presented below (in
thousands):
Net sales of operating segments
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ACI |
$ | 20,293 | $ | 14,484 | ||||
American Furniture |
35,940 | 43,980 | ||||||
ERGObaby |
11,471 | | ||||||
Fox |
42,880 | 32,732 | ||||||
Halo |
32,686 | 29,704 | ||||||
Liberty |
20,203 | | ||||||
Staffmark |
246,799 | 217,402 | ||||||
Tridien |
13,853 | 15,317 | ||||||
Total |
424,125 | 353,619 | ||||||
Reconciliation of segment revenues to consolidated
revenues: |
||||||||
Corporate and other |
| | ||||||
Total consolidated revenues |
$ | 424,125 | $ | 353,619 | ||||
Profit (loss) of operating segments (1)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ACI |
$ | 7,082 | $ | 944 | ||||
American Furniture (2) |
(7,998 | ) | 2,713 | |||||
ERGObaby |
2,384 | | ||||||
Fox |
5,024 | 2,862 | ||||||
Halo |
(451 | ) | (775 | ) | ||||
Liberty |
896 | (1,450 | ) | |||||
Staffmark |
(336 | ) | (832 | ) | ||||
Tridien |
1,243 | 2,234 | ||||||
Total |
7,844 | 5,696 | ||||||
Reconciliation of segment profit to consolidated loss
before income taxes: |
||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(2,537 | ) | (2,686 | ) | ||||
Other income |
246 | 180 | ||||||
Corporate and other (3) |
(9,700 | ) | (21,289 | ) | ||||
Total consolidated loss before
income taxes |
$ | (4,147 | ) | $ | (18,099 | ) | ||
(1) | Segment profit (loss) represents operating income (loss). | |
(2) | Includes $7.7 million of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges during the three months ended March 31, 2011. See Note F. | |
(3) | Includes fair value adjustments related to the supplemental put liability and the call option of a noncontrolling shareholder. See Note H. |
11
Table of Contents
Accounts | Accounts | |||||||
Receivable | Receivable | |||||||
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Accounts receivable |
||||||||
ACI |
$ | 5,815 | $ | 5,694 | ||||
American Furniture |
16,007 | 13,543 | ||||||
ERGObaby |
4,911 | 3,273 | ||||||
Fox |
15,871 | 17,482 | ||||||
Halo |
20,740 | 29,761 | ||||||
Liberty |
12,378 | 9,720 | ||||||
Staffmark |
126,735 | 128,491 | ||||||
Tridien |
6,334 | 6,004 | ||||||
Total |
208,791 | 213,968 | ||||||
Reconciliation of segment to consolidated totals: |
||||||||
Corporate and other |
| | ||||||
Total |
208,791 | 213,968 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(4,554 | ) | (5,481 | ) | ||||
Total consolidated net accounts receivable |
$ | 204,237 | $ | 208,487 | ||||
Depreciation and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable | Amortization Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | Goodwill | Assets | Identifiable | for the Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mar. 31, | Dec. 31, | Mar. 31, | Assets | Ended Mar. 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011(1) | Dec. 31, 2010(1) | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and identifiable assets of
operating segments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACI |
$ | 57,615 | $ | 57,615 | $ | 28,851 | $ | 28,919 | $ | 1,102 | $ | 905 | ||||||||||||
American Furniture (3) |
| 5,900 | 53,813 | 60,067 | 771 | 776 | ||||||||||||||||||
ERGObaby |
33,397 | 33,397 | 58,554 | 59,248 | 684 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Fox |
31,372 | 31,372 | 86,030 | 82,295 | 1,625 | 1,526 | ||||||||||||||||||
Halo |
39,252 | 39,252 | 44,466 | 41,304 | 812 | 840 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liberty |
32,685 | 32,870 | 37,946 | 40,917 | 1,612 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Staffmark |
89,715 | 89,715 | 76,304 | 77,830 | 1,883 | 1,895 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tridien |
19,555 | 19,555 | 18,844 | 18,774 | 581 | 608 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
303,591 | 309,676 | 404,808 | 409,354 | 9,070 | 6,550 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of segment to consolidated total: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other identifiable assets |
| | 42,242 | 40,349 | 1,244 | 1,455 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
| | | | 459 | 418 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill carried at Corporate level (2) |
16,175 | 16,175 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 319,766 | $ | 325,851 | $ | 447,050 | $ | 449,703 | $ | 10,773 | $ | 8,423 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Does not include accounts receivable balances per schedule above. | |
(2) | Represents goodwill resulting from purchase accounting adjustments not pushed down to the segments. This amount is allocated back to the respective segments for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. | |
(3) | Refer to Note F for discussion regarding American Furnitures goodwill impairment recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2011. |
Other segment
Staffmark
On April 12, 2011, Staffmark filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for a proposed initial public offering of Staffmarks common stock. The
Company currently owns approximately 68.5% of Staffmarks common stock, on a fully diluted basis.
12
Table of Contents
ERGObaby
In connection with the acquisition of ERGObaby in September 2010, the Company recorded contingent
consideration of $0.2 million during 2010, its then fair value. The contingent consideration
relates to the $2.0 million additional cash payment the sellers would be entitled to in the event
ERGObabys net sales, as determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 are equal to or greater than a contractually agreed upon fixed
amount. If the sellers do not reach this sales goal for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,
the sellers would not be entitled to any payment. During the three months ended March 31, 2011,
the Company recorded an increase in the fair value of the
contingent consideration of $0.5 million associated with the increased probability of obtaining the
contractually agreed upon sales goal for 2011. Refer to Note H for valuation techniques applied to
the contingent consideration liability.
Note E Property, plant and equipment and inventory
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Machinery, equipment and software |
$ | 43,408 | $ | 42,421 | ||||
Office furniture and equipment |
3,544 | 2,812 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
11,688 | 9,551 | ||||||
58,640 | 54,784 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(23,233 | ) | (21,300 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 35,407 | $ | 33,484 | ||||
Depreciation expense was $2.4 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
Inventory is comprised of the following at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 51,414 | $ | 47,444 | ||||
Finished goods |
28,366 | 31,830 | ||||||
Less: obsolescence reserve |
(1,949 | ) | (1,862 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 77,831 | $ | 77,412 | ||||
Note F Goodwill and other intangible assets
Goodwill represents the difference between purchase cost and the fair value of net assets acquired
in business acquisitions. Indefinite lived intangible assets, representing trademarks and trade
names, are not amortized until their useful life is determined to no longer be indefinite.
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually as of
March 31, or unless a triggering event occurs, by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit
to its carrying value.
2011 Annual goodwill impairment testing
The Company conducted its annual goodwill impairment testing as of March 31, 2011. At each of
the reporting units tested, the units fair value exceeded carrying value with the exception of
American Furniture. The carrying amount of American Furniture exceeded its fair value due to the
significant decrease in revenue and operating profit at American Furniture resulting from the
negative impact on the promotional furniture market due to the significant decline in the U.S.
housing market, high unemployment rates and aggressive pricing employed by its competitors. As a
result of the carrying amount of goodwill exceeding its fair value, the Company recorded a $5.9
million impairment charge as of March 31, 2011 which represented the remaining balance of goodwill
on American Furnitures balance sheet. The Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge totaling
$35.5 million in the third quarter of 2010.
The carrying amount of American Furniture exceeded its fair value at March 31, 2011 by a
significant amount due primarily to the significant decrease in revenue and operating profit
together with managements revised outlook on near term operating results. Further, the
preliminary results of this analysis indicated that the carrying value of American Furnitures
13
Table of Contents
trade name exceeded its fair value by approximately $1.8 million. The fair value of the American
Furniture trade name was determined by applying the relief from royalty technique to forecasted
revenues at the American Furniture reporting unit.
The impairment charge related to the American Furniture reporting unit reflects the preliminary
result from the impairment analysis performed and is subject to finalization of certain fair value
estimates being performed with the assistance of an outside independent valuation specialist, and
may be adjusted when all aspects of the analysis are completed. The Company expects to finalize
the goodwill impairment analysis during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Any adjustments to the
estimate of impairment as a result of completion of this evaluation are currently expected to be
recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
Of the remaining seven reporting units as of March 31, 2011 the fair value of one of the reporting
units was not substantially in excess of its carrying value. Information from the preliminary
step-one impairment test for this reporting unit is as follows:
Reporting Unit | Percentage fair value of goodwill exceeds carrying value | Carrying value of goodwill @ March 31, 2011 | ||||||
HALO |
9.7 | % | $39.2 million |
A one percent increase in the discount rate, from 13% to 14%, would have impacted the fair value of
HALO by approximately $5.0 million and would have required the Company to perform a step-two
analysis that may have resulted in an impairment charge for HALO as of March 31, 2011. Factors
that could potentially trigger a subsequent interim impairment review in the future and possible
impairment loss at the HALO reporting unit include significant underperformance relative to future
operating results or significant negative industry or economic trends.
The estimates employed and judgment used in determining critical accounting estimates have not
changed significantly from those disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the SEC.
2010 Annual goodwill impairment testing
The Company completed its 2010 annual goodwill impairment testing as of March 31, 2010. For each reporting unit, the analysis indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and as a result the carrying value of goodwill was not impaired.
The Company completed its 2010 annual goodwill impairment testing as of March 31, 2010. For each reporting unit, the analysis indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and as a result the carrying value of goodwill was not impaired.
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of goodwill for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, is as follows (in thousands):
Three months | Year ended | |||||||
ended March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Beginning balance: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 411,386 | $ | 338,028 | ||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(85,535 | ) | (50,000 | ) | ||||
325,851 | 288,028 | |||||||
Impairment losses |
(5,900 | ) | (35,535 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of businesses (1) |
| 73,492 | ||||||
Adjustment to purchase accounting |
(185 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments |
(6,085 | ) | 37,823 | |||||
Ending balance: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
411,201 | 411,386 | ||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(91,435 | ) | (85,535 | ) | ||||
$ | 319,766 | $ | 325,851 | |||||
(1) | Relates to the purchase of ERGObaby, Liberty Safe, Circuit Express and Relay Gear in 2010. |
14
Table of Contents
Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets are comprised of the following at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in
thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | Weighted Average | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Useful Lives | ||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 231,623 | $ | 231,783 | 12 | |||||||
Technology |
44,879 | 44,879 | 8 | |||||||||
Trade names, subject to amortization |
26,080 | 26,080 | 12 | |||||||||
Licensing and non-compete agreements |
10,048 | 10,048 | 4 | |||||||||
Distributor relations and other |
985 | 896 | 4 | |||||||||
313,615 | 313,686 | |||||||||||
Accumulated amortization customer relationships |
(73,648 | ) | (68,304 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization technology |
(17,989 | ) | (16,663 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization trade names, subject to amortization |
(5,464 | ) | (4,963 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization licensing and non-compete agreements |
(6,100 | ) | (5,640 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization distributor relations and other |
(645 | ) | (574 | ) | ||||||||
Total accumulated amortization |
(103,846 | ) | (96,144 | ) | ||||||||
Trade names, not subject to amortization |
50,330 | 52,130 | ||||||||||
Total intangibles, net |
$ | 260,099 | $ | 269,672 | ||||||||
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $7.9 million and $6.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Note G Debt
The Credit Agreement at March 31, 2011 provides for a Revolving Credit Facility totaling $340
million, subject to borrowing base restrictions, which matures in December 2012, and a Term Loan
Facility with a balance of $73.5 million at March 31, 2011, which matures in December 2013. The
Term Loan Facility requires quarterly payments of $0.5 million with a final payment of the
outstanding principal balance due on December 7, 2013. The carrying value of the Term Loan
Facility as of March 31, 2011 approximated fair value, and was calculated based on interest rates
that are currently available to the Company for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities.
The Company had $7.0 million in outstanding borrowings under its Revolving Credit Facility at March
31, 2011. The Company had approximately $253.6 million in borrowing base availability under its
Revolving Credit Facility at March 31, 2011. Letters of credit outstanding at March 31, 2011
totaled approximately $68.9 million. At March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants.
The following table provides the Companys debt holdings at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | 7,000 | $ | 22,000 | ||||
Term loan facility |
73,500 | 74,000 | ||||||
Total debt |
$ | 80,500 | $ | 96,000 | ||||
Less: Current portion, term loan facility |
(2,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | ||||
Less: Current portion, revolving credit facility |
| | ||||||
Long term debt |
$ | 78,500 | $ | 94,000 | ||||
15
Table of Contents
Note H Fair value measurement
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a
recurring basis at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Supplemental put obligation (including current portion) |
$ | 47,826 | $ | | $ | | $ | 47,826 | ||||||||
Call option of noncontrolling shareholder (1) |
600 | | | 600 | ||||||||||||
Put option of noncontrolling shareholders (2) |
50 | | | 50 | ||||||||||||
Contingent consideration related to ERGObaby acquisition (3) |
677 | | | 677 |
(1) | Represents a noncontrolling shareholders call option to purchase additional common stock in Tridien. | |
(2) | Represents put options issued to noncontrolling shareholders in connection with the Liberty acquisition. | |
(3) | Represents contingent consideration liability related to the acquisition of ERGObaby in September 2010. |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liability interest rate swap |
$ | 143 | $ | | $ | 143 | $ | | ||||||||
Supplemental put obligation |
44,598 | | | 44,598 | ||||||||||||
Call option of noncontrolling shareholder |
1,200 | | | 1,200 | ||||||||||||
Put option of noncontrolling shareholders |
50 | | | 50 | ||||||||||||
Contingent consideration related to ERGObaby acquisition |
177 | | | 177 |
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of our level 3 supplemental put liability
(including current portion) from January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 and from January 1, 2010
through March 31, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 44,598 | $ | 12,082 | ||||
Supplemental put expense |
3,228 | 14,426 | ||||||
Balance at March 31 |
$ | 47,826 | $ | 26,508 | ||||
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of our level 3 call option of a
noncontrolling shareholder from January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 is as follows (in
thousands):
2011 | ||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 1,200 | ||
Fair Value adjustment to Call option |
(600 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31 |
$ | 600 | ||
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of our level 3 contingent consideration
liability at ERGObaby from January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
2011 | ||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 177 | ||
Fair Value adjustment to contingent consideration liability |
500 | |||
Balance at March 31 |
$ | 677 | ||
Valuation Techniques
Interest rate swap:
The Companys derivative instrument consisted of an over-the-counter (OTC) interest rate swap
contract which was not traded on a public exchange. The fair value of the Companys interest rate
swap contract was determined based on inputs that were readily available in public markets or
could be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. The swap expired in
January 2011. See Note I.
16
Table of Contents
Supplemental put:
The Company and CGM entered into a Supplemental Put Agreement, which requires the Company to
acquire the Allocation Interests owned by CGM upon termination of the Management Services
Agreement. Essentially, the put right granted to CGM requires the Company to acquire CGMs
Allocation Interests in the Company at a price based on 20% of the companys profits upon
clearance of a 7% annualized hurdle rate. Each fiscal quarter the Company estimates the fair
value of this potential liability associated with the Supplemental Put Agreement. Any change in
the potential liability is accrued currently as a non-cash adjustment to earnings. The increase
in the supplemental put liability during the three months ended
March 31, 2011, was primarily related to increases in the estimated values of the Advanced
Circuits and Fox operating segments.
Options of noncontrolling shareholders:
The call option of the noncontrolling shareholder was determined based on inputs that were not
readily available in public markets or able to be derived from information available in publicly
quoted markets. As such, the Company categorized the call option of the noncontrolling
shareholder as Level 3.
The put options of noncontrolling shareholders were determined based on inputs that were not
readily available in public markets or able to be derived from information available in publicly
quoted markets. As such, the Company categorized the put options of the noncontrolling
shareholders as Level 3.
Contingent consideration:
The fair value of this contingent consideration liability for ERGObaby was valued assuming a
percentage probability of achieving the agreed upon sales goal, discounted to present value
utilizing a discounted cash flow model.
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a
non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Gains/(losses) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at Mar. 31, 2011 | Three months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Mar. 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill (1) |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (5,900 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||
Trade name (2) |
1,200 | | | 1,200 | (1,800 | ) | $ | |
(1) | Represents the fair value of goodwill at the AFM business segment subsequent to the goodwill impairment charge recognized during the first quarter of 2011. See Note F for further discussion regarding impairment and valuation techniques applied. | |
(2) | Represents the fair value of AFMs trade name at the AFM business segment subsequent to the impairment charge recognized during the first quarter of 2011. |
Note I Derivative instruments and hedging activities
On January 22, 2008, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap (Swap) agreement
with a bank, fixing the rate of its Term Loan Facility borrowings at 7.35%. The Swap was designated
as a cash flow hedge and expired in January 2011.
The Companys objective for entering into the Swap was to manage the interest rate exposure on a
portion of its Term Loan Facility by fixing its interest rate at 7.35% and avoiding the potential
variability of interest rate fluctuations. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the
Company recorded a $0.1 million gain and $0.3 million gain, respectively, to accumulated other
comprehensive loss, which reflects that portion of comprehensive income (loss) reclassified to net
income (loss).
17
Table of Contents
Note J Comprehensive loss
The following table sets forth the computation of comprehensive loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net loss attributable to Holdings |
$ | (6,974 | ) | $ | (15,969 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge |
143 | 319 | ||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
143 | 319 | ||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
$ | (6,831 | ) | $ | (15,650 | ) | ||
Note K Stockholders equity
The Trust is authorized to issue 500,000,000 Trust shares and the Company is authorized to issue a
corresponding number of LLC interests. The Company will at all times have the identical number of
LLC interests outstanding as Trust shares. Each Trust share represents an undivided beneficial
interest in the Trust, and each Trust share is entitled to one vote per share on any matter with
respect to which members of the Company are entitled to vote.
Distributions:
| On January 28, 2011, the Company paid a distribution of $0.34 per share to holders of record as of January 21, 2011. | ||
| On March 8, 2011, the Company declared a distribution of $0.36 per share and paid it on April 12, 2011 to holders of record as of March 29, 2011. |
Note L Warranties
The Companys ERGObaby, Fox, Liberty and Tridien operating segments estimate their exposure to
warranty claims based on both current and historical product sales data and warranty costs
incurred. The Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability quarterly and
adjusts the amount as necessary.
A reconciliation of the change in the carrying value of the Companys warranty liability for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 is as follows (in
thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 3,237 | $ | 1,529 | ||||
Accrual |
605 | 2,872 | ||||||
Warranty payments |
(461 | ) | (1,726 | ) | ||||
Other (1) |
| 562 | ||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 3,381 | $ | 3,237 | ||||
(1) | Represents warranty liabilities acquired in 2010 related to Liberty Safe and ERGObaby. |
Note M Noncontrolling interest
Noncontrolling interest represents the portion of the Companys majority-owned subsidiarys net
income and equity that is owned by noncontrolling shareholders.
18
Table of Contents
The following tables reflect the Companys ownership percentage of its majority owned operating
segments and related noncontrolling interest balances as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
% Ownership | % Ownership | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Primary | Fully Diluted | Primary | Fully Diluted | |||||||||||||
ACI |
69.6 | 69.4 | 69.6 | 69.4 | ||||||||||||
American Furniture |
99.9 | 91.4 | 99.9 | 91.4 | ||||||||||||
ERGObaby |
83.9 | 79.9 | 83.9 | 79.9 | ||||||||||||
FOX |
75.7 | 68.1 | 75.7 | 68.1 | ||||||||||||
HALO |
88.7 | 72.8 | 88.7 | 72.8 | ||||||||||||
Liberty |
96.2 | 87.7 | 96.2 | 87.7 | ||||||||||||
Staffmark |
76.2 | 68.5 | 76.2 | 68.5 | ||||||||||||
Tridien |
73.9 | 61.8 | 73.9 | 61.8 |
Noncontrolling Interest Balances | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
ACI
|
$ | 2,326 | $ | 2,326 | ||||
American Furniture
|
(109 | ) | (163 | ) | ||||
ERGObaby
|
7,265 | 7,087 | ||||||
FOX
|
14,248 | 13,373 | ||||||
HALO
|
3,128 | 3,211 | ||||||
Liberty
|
1,214 | 1,156 | ||||||
Staffmark
|
51,560 | 50,962 | ||||||
Tridien
|
9,982 | 9,788 | ||||||
CGM
|
100 | 100 | ||||||
$ | 89,714 | $ | 87,840 | |||||
Note N Income taxes
Each fiscal quarter the Company estimates its annual effective tax rate and applies that rate to
its interim earnings. In this regard, the Company reflects the tax impact of certain unusual or
infrequently occurring items and the effects of changes in tax laws or rates in the interim period
in which they occur.
The computation of the annual estimated effective tax rate in each interim period requires certain
estimates and significant judgment, including the projected operating income for the year,
projections of the proportion of income earned and taxed in other jurisdictions, permanent and
temporary differences and the likelihood of recovering deferred tax assets generated in the current
year. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for income taxes may change as new
events occur, as additional information is obtained or as the tax environment changes.
Our effective income tax rate (benefit) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was
58.4% and (15.5)%, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31,
2011 includes a significant loss at the Companys parent, which is taxed as a partnership, and is
due largely to interest expense and to the expense associated with the supplemental put.
The reconciliation between the Federal Statutory Rate and the effective income tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
Three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
United States Federal Statutory Rate |
(35.0 | %) | (35.0 | %) | ||||
Foreign and State income taxes (net of Federal benefits) |
8.9 | 0.4 | ||||||
Expenses of Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC
representing a pass through to shareholders |
27.8 | 32.3 | ||||||
Credit utilization |
(25.5 | ) | (5.8 | ) | ||||
Quarterly effective tax rate adjustment |
23.0 | (13.1 | ) | |||||
Impairment expense |
49.8 | | ||||||
Other |
9.4 | 5.7 | ||||||
Effective income tax rate |
58.4 | % | (15.5 | %) | ||||
19
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This item 2 contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond
our control. Our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities could differ materially
from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Additional risks of which we
are not currently aware or which we currently deem immaterial could also cause our actual results
to differ, including those discussed in the sections entitled Forward-Looking Statements
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report as well as those risk factors discussed in the section
entitled Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Overview
Compass Diversified Holdings, a Delaware statutory trust, was incorporated in Delaware on November
18, 2005. Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, was also
formed on November 18, 2005. In accordance with the Trust Agreement, the Trust is sole owner of
100% of the Trust Interests (as defined in the LLC Agreement) of the Company and, pursuant to the
LLC Agreement, the Company has outstanding, the identical number of Trust Interests as the number
of outstanding shares of the Trust. The Manager is the sole owner of the Allocation Interests of
the Company. The Company is the operating entity with a board of directors and other corporate
governance responsibilities, similar to that of a Delaware corporation.
The Trust and the Company were formed to acquire and manage a group of small and middle-market
businesses headquartered in North America. We characterize small to middle market businesses as
those that generate annual cash flows of up to $60 million. We focus on companies of this size
because of our belief that these companies are often more able to achieve growth rates above those
of their relevant industries and are also frequently more susceptible to efforts to improve
earnings and cash flow.
In pursuing new acquisitions, we seek businesses with the following characteristics:
| North American base of operations; |
| stable and growing earnings and cash flow; |
| maintains a significant market share in defensible industry niche (i.e., has a reason to exist); |
| solid and proven management team with meaningful incentives; |
| low technological and/or product obsolescence risk; and |
| a diversified customer and supplier base. |
Our management teams strategy for our businesses involves:
| utilizing structured incentive compensation programs tailored to each business to attract, recruit and retain talented managers to operate our businesses; |
| regularly monitoring financial and operational performance, instilling consistent financial discipline, and supporting management in the development and implementation of information systems to effectively achieve these goals; |
| assisting management in their analysis and pursuit of prudent organic cash flow growth strategies (both revenue and cost related); |
| identifying and working with management to execute attractive external growth and acquisition opportunities; and |
| forming strong subsidiary level boards of directors to supplement management in their development and implementation of strategic goals and objectives. |
20
Table of Contents
We are dependent on the earnings of, and cash receipts from our businesses to meet our corporate
overhead and management fee expenses and to pay distributions. These earnings and distributions,
net of any minority interests in these businesses, are generally available:
| First, to meet capital expenditure requirements, management fees and corporate overhead expenses; | ||
| Second, to fund distributions from the businesses to the Company; and | ||
| Third, to be distributed by the Trust to shareholders. |
2011 Highlights
Increase in quarterly distribution
On March 29, 2011 we declared a first quarter distribution of $0.36 per share payable April 12,
2011, which represented an increase of $0.02 per share.
Staffmark preliminary prospectus filing
On April 12, 2011, Staffmark Holdings, Inc. (Staffmark) filed a registration statement on Form
S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a proposed initial public offering of
Staffmarks common stock. We currently own approximately 68.5% of Staffmarks common stock, on a
fully diluted basis.
Outlook
Sales and operating income during the first quarter of 2011 increased at six of our eight
businesses when compared to the first quarter of 2010. The estimate of gross domestic product
(GDP), a measure of the total production of goods and services, increased during the first
quarter of 2011 at the seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 1.8%, compared to 3.1% in the four
quarter of 2010. Although this marks the seventh consecutive sequential quarterly increase in the
GDP following four consecutive quarterly decreases the decreased rate of growth is an indication
that consumer spending has slowed down. Each of our businesses is impacted by the overall economic
environment including both consumer spending and increasing commodity and fuel costs.
Additionally, American Furniture is also significantly affected by continued tight credit markets
and the depressed housing market which is evident in the significant decrease in quarter over
quarter sales and operating profit in the first quarter of 2011.
We believe that we will experience sustained modest top-line growth in each of our businesses, with
the exception of American Furniture and Tridien, through the remainder of fiscal 2011, although we
cannot accurately predict the impact that rising commodity costs, such as steel, cotton and fuel
will have on our gross profit margins if current market conditions continue to exist and we are not
able to successfully raise prices to offset the cost increases.
We also believe that the current credit environment may continue to benefit our acquisition model
as we do not rely on separate third-party financing as a component to closing.
Results of Operations
We were formed on November 18, 2005 and acquired our existing businesses (segments) as follows:
May 16, 2006 | August 1, 2006 | February 28, 2007 | August 31, 2007 | January 4, 2008 | March 31, 2010 | |||||
Advanced Circuits | Tridien | HALO | American Furniture | Fox | Liberty Safe | |||||
Staffmark |
September 16, 2010 | ||||||||||
ERGObaby |
21
Table of Contents
Consolidated Results of Operations Compass Diversified Holdings and Compass Group Diversified
Holdings LLC
Three months | Three months | |||||||
ended | ended | |||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 424,125 | $ | 353,619 | ||||
Cost of sales |
334,537 | 282,593 | ||||||
Gross profit |
89,588 | 71,026 | ||||||
Staffing, selling, general and administrative expense |
68,512 | 61,988 | ||||||
Fees to Manager |
3,843 | 3,664 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense |
3,228 | 14,426 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
7,702 | 6,123 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
7,700 | | ||||||
Operating loss |
$ | (1,397 | ) | $ | (15,175 | ) | ||
Net sales
On a consolidated basis, net sales for the first quarter of 2011 increased by approximately $70.5
million or 19.9% when compared to last years first quarter. Net sales during the three-months
ended March 31, 2011 attributable to the 2010 acquisitions were $31.7 million. Increased
revenues at Staffmark and Fox during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
same period in 2010 is responsible for the majority of the remaining increase in net sales during
the current quarter. Refer to Results of Operations Our Businesses for a more detailed
analysis of net sales by business segment.
We do not generate any revenues apart from those generated by the businesses we own. We may
generate interest income on the investment of available funds, but expect such earnings to be
minimal. Our investment in our businesses is typically in the form of loans from the Company to
such businesses, as well as equity interests in those companies. Cash flows coming to the Trust and
the Company are the result of interest payments on those loans, amortization of those loans and, in
the future, potentially, dividends on our equity ownership. However, on a consolidated basis these
items will be eliminated.
Cost of sales
On a consolidated basis, cost of sales increased approximately $51.9 million during the three month
period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the corresponding period in 2010. This increase is due
almost entirely to the corresponding increase in net sales referred to above. Gross profit as a
percentage of sales increased approximately 100 basis points to approximately 21.1% during the
first quarter of 2011 compared to 20.1% in 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the
2010 acquisitions are higher than the average margin of our other businesses which helped increase
the 2011 average gross profit margin. Refer to Results of Operations Our Businesses for a
more detailed analysis of cost of sales by business segment.
Staffing, selling, general and administrative expense
On a consolidated basis, staffing, selling, general and administrative expense increased
approximately $6.5 million during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
corresponding period in 2010. This increase is due principally to: (i) increases in costs directly
tied to sales such as commissions and direct customer support services; (ii) increases in selling
general and administrative expenses attributable to the 2010 acquisitions totaling $5.4 million
during the first quarter of 2011, offset in part by non-cash stock compensation expense incurred at
Advanced Circuits totaling approximately $3.8 million in the first quarter of 2010 with no
like-kind charge incurred during the most recent quarter. Refer to Results of Operations Our
Businesses for a more detailed analysis of staffing, selling, general and administrative expense
by business segment. At the corporate level, staffing, selling, general and administrative expense
decreased $0.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in
2010.
Fees to manager
Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, we pay CGM a quarterly management fee equal to 0.5%
(2.0% annually) of our consolidated adjusted net assets. We accrue for the management fee on a
quarterly basis. For the three-months ended March 31, 2011 we incurred approximately $3.8 million
in expense for these fees compared to $3.7 million for the corresponding period in 2010.
Supplemental put expense
Concurrent with the 2006 IPO, we entered into a Supplemental Put Agreement with our Manager
pursuant to which our Manager has the right to cause us to purchase the Allocation Interests then
owned by them upon termination of the Management Services Agreement. This charge represents the
estimated increase/decrease in the value of our businesses over our basis in those businesses
together with the increase/decrease in the contribution portion of the profit allocation that our
22
Table of Contents
Manager would be entitled to if the Management Services Agreement were terminated. During the
three months ended March 31, 2011, we incurred approximately $3.2 million in supplemental put
expense based on higher overall valuations attributed to our subsidiaries compared to valuations
determined as of December 31, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we incurred
approximately $14.4 million in supplemental put expense based on higher overall valuations
attributed to our subsidiaries compared to valuations determined as of December 31, 2009. The
change in supplemental put expense in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 is
attributable to the increase in the fair value of our businesses.
Impairment expense
We incurred an impairment charge in the first quarter of 2011 totaling $7.7 million at our American
Furniture business segment based on our preliminary analysis of step one of our annual goodwill
impairment analysis. The portion of the impairment charge that was attributable to impaired
goodwill at American Furniture was $5.9 million. The remaining $1.8 million charge reflected a
write down of the unamortized balance of American Furnitures intangible asset, its trade name.
The write downs were necessary based on the further deterioration of the promotional furniture
market.
We have completed our preliminary annual impairment analysis of goodwill as of March 31, 2011
and there is no indication of goodwill impairment at any of our other reporting units at this time.
Results of Operations Our Businesses
The following discussion reflects a comparison of the historical results of operations of each of
our businesses for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 on a
stand-alone basis. The results of operations for the 2010 acquisitions include appropriate
pro-forma adjustments and explanations. We believe this is the most meaningful comparison of the
operating results for each of our business segments. The following results of operations of our
businesses are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year.
Advanced Circuits
Overview
Advanced Circuits is a provider of prototype, quick-turn and volume production PCBs to customers
throughout the United States. Collectively, prototype and quick-turn PCBs represent over 60% of
Advanced Circuits gross revenues. Prototype and quick-turn PCBs typically command higher margins
than volume production PCBs given that customers require high levels of responsiveness, technical
support and timely delivery of prototype and quick-turn PCBs and are willing to pay a premium for
them. Advanced Circuits is able to meet its customers demands by manufacturing custom PCBs in as
little as 24 hours, while maintaining over 98.0% error-free production rates and real-time
customer service and product tracking 24 hours per day.
While global demand for PCBs has remained strong in recent years, industry wide domestic
production has declined over 50% since 2000. In contrast, Advanced Circuits revenues increased
steadily through 2008 (2009 saw a slight reduction) and increased again in 2010 and into the first
quarter of 2011 as its customers prototype and quick-turn PCB requirements, such as small
quantity orders and rapid turnaround, are less able to be met by low cost volume manufacturers in
Asia and elsewhere. Advanced Circuits management anticipates that demand for its prototype and
quick-turn printed circuit boards will remain strong and anticipates that demand will be impacted
less by current economic conditions than by its longer lead time production business, which is
driven more by consumer purchasing patterns and capital investments by businesses.
We purchased a controlling interest in Advanced Circuits on May 16, 2006.
On March 11, 2010, Advanced Circuits acquired Circuit Express based in Tempe, Arizona for
approximately $16.1 million. Circuit Express focuses on quick-turn manufacturing of prototype and
low-volume quantities of rigid PCBs primarily for aerospace and defense related customers. In the
following discussion of results of operations we may refer to Circuits Express as ACI-Tempe.
23
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for Advanced Circuits for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 20,293 | $ | 14,484 | ||||
Cost of sales |
8,928 | 6,217 | ||||||
Gross profit |
11,365 | 8,267 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
3,401 | 6,604 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
125 | 126 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
757 | 593 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 7,082 | $ | 944 | ||||
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $5.8 million or 40.1%
over the corresponding three month period ended March 31, 2010. The increase in net sales is a
result of increased gross sales in long-lead time PCBs ($1.8 million), quick-turn production and
prototype PCBs ($3.3 million) and assembly revenue ($0.5 million). Sales from quick-turn and
prototype PCBs represented approximately 62% of net sales in 2011 compared to 63% in 2010. Net
sales attributable to ACI-Tempe were approximately $5.1 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2011
compared to $1.1 in the same period in 2010. Results of operations for ACI-Tempe for the first
quarter of 2010 only included twenty days of operations.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $2.7 million from
the comparable period in 2010. This increase is principally due to the corresponding increase in
sales. Gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased during the three months ended March 31,
2011 (56.0% at March 31, 2011 as compared to 57.1% at March 31, 2010) largely as a result of the
lower margins earned on the larger proportion of ACI-Tempe sales during the quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased approximately $3.2 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 due principally to non-cash stock
compensation issued to management in January 2010 totaling approximately $3.8 million, and $0.3
million in direct acquisition costs incurred in acquiring ACI-Tempe
in the three-months ended March 31, 2010. Ignoring these one-time 2010 charges, selling, general
and administrative expense increased approximately $0.9 million during the three months ended March
31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. ACI-Tempe incurred $0.9 million in selling, general
and administrative costs in the three-months ended March 31, 2011 compared to approximately $0.2
million reflected in ACIs expenses in 2010, an increase of $0.7 million.
Income from operations
Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $7.1 million, an
increase of approximately $6.1 million compared to $0.9 million earned in the same period in 2010,
principally as a result of those factors described above.
American Furniture
Overview
Founded in 1998 and headquartered in Ecru, Mississippi, American Furniture is a leading U.S.
manufacturer of upholstered furniture, focused exclusively on the promotional segment of the
furniture industry. American Furniture offers a broad product line of stationary and motion
furniture, including sofas, loveseats, sectionals, recliners and complementary products, sold
primarily at retail price points ranging between $199 and $1,399. American Furniture is a
low-cost manufacturer and is able to ship any product in its line to over 800 customers within 48
hours of receiving an order.
24
Table of Contents
American Furnitures products are adapted from established designs in the following categories:
(i) motion and recliner; (ii) stationary; (iii) occasional chair, and; (iv) accent tables and
rugs. American Furnitures products are manufactured from common components and offer proven
select fabric options, providing manufacturing efficiency and resulting in limited design risk or
inventory obsolescence.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income (loss) from operations data for American Furniture for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 35,940 | $ | 43,980 | ||||
Cost of sales |
31,290 | 35,946 | ||||||
Gross profit |
4,650 | 8,034 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
4,277 | 4,650 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
125 | 125 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
546 | 546 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
7,700 | | ||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | (7,998 | ) | $ | 2,713 | |||
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased approximately $8.0 million, or 18.3%
over the corresponding three months ended March 31, 2010. Stationary product net sales decreased
approximately $4.2 million, recliner product sales decreased approximately $2.7 million, and motion
product sales decreased approximately $0.8 million. Sales of other products and a reduction in fuel
surcharges were responsible for the remaining decrease in net sales during the three-months ended
March 31, 2011 compared to 2010. The decrease in net sales in all categories is the result of an
extremely soft current retail environment and increased competition in pricing in our promotional
furniture category during the first quarter of 2011. Sales to AFMs largest customer decreased
$7.0 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to 2010. The first fiscal quarter of each year
is typically AFMs largest quarter in terms of net sales.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales decreased approximately $4.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same period of 2010 and is due primarily to the corresponding decrease in sales.
Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 12.9% in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared
to 18.3% in 2010. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of sales of approximately 5.4%
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 is principally attributable to: (i) reduced selling
prices during the first quarter of 2011 that were necessary based on aggressive competitor pricing;
(ii) increases in overhead absorption rates on finished goods during the current quarter due to the
decrease in production volume, and; (iii) raw material price increases. These increases were
offset in part by a slight reduction in third-party shipping costs as a greater proportion of
delivery was done in-house during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and those costs are currently
reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011, decreased
approximately $0.4 million compared to the same period of 2010. This decrease is primarily due to
decreased costs of insurance, bad debt expense and sales commissions. AFM initiated cost cutting
measures during the quarter such as reducing headcount and consolidating warehouse facilities which
will begin to reflect savings in subsequent quarters during fiscal 2011.
Impairment expense
American Furniture incurred an impairment charge to its goodwill ($5.9 million) and unamortized
trade name ($1.8 million), aggregating $7.7 million, during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
During the year ended 2010 American Furniture wrote down $35.5 million of its goodwill asset
leaving a balance of $5.9 million. The impairment charge noted above eliminates the remaining
balance of goodwill. The $1.8 million impairment charge to American Furnitures trade name is on
top of $3.3 million in impairment charges to its trade name expensed in 2010. The remaining
intangible asset balance
25
Table of Contents
attributable to trade name after the latest impairment charge is $1.2 million. There were
no impairment charges for American Furniture during the comparable 2010 first quarter. The
impairment charges resulted from the preliminary results from the annual step one analysis of
goodwill and were necessary based on the further deterioration of the promotional furniture market.
Income (loss) from operations
Loss from operations totaled approximately $8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to income from operations of approximately $2.7 million in the three months ended March
31, 2010, principally due the impairment charges and other factors described above.
ERGObaby
Overview
ERGObaby, with headquarters in Pukalani, Hawaii, is a premier designer, marketer and distributor
of baby wearing products and accessories. ERGObaby offers a broad range of wearable baby carriers
and related products that are sold through more than 900 retailers and web shops in the United
States and internationally in approximately 20 countries. ERGObaby has two main product lines:
baby carriers (organic and standard) and accessories.
On September 16, 2010 we made loans to and purchased a controlling interest in ERGObaby for
approximately $85.2 million, representing 84% of the equity in ERGObaby. ERGObabys reputation
for product innovation, reliability and safety has lead to numerous awards and accolades from
consumer surveys and publications, including Parenting Magazine, Pregnancy Magazine and Wired
Magazine.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the pro-forma income from operations data for ERGObaby for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | (pro-forma) | (pro-forma) | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 11,471 | $ | 7,610 | ||||
Cost of services (a) |
4,172 | 2,286 | ||||||
Gross profit |
7,299 | 5,324 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
4,127 | 2,403 | ||||||
Fees to manager (b) |
125 | 125 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles (c) |
429 | 429 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 2,618 | $ | 2,367 | ||||
Pro-forma results of operations of ERGObaby for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 includes the following pro-forma adjustments applied to historical results:
(a) | Cost of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 does not include $0.2 million of amortization expense associated with the inventory fair value step-up recorded in 2011 as a result of and derived from the purchase price allocation in connection with our purchase. | |
(b) | Represents management fees that would have been payable to the Manager in 2010. | |
(c) | An increase in amortization of intangible assets totaling $0.4 million in 2010. This adjustment is a result of and was derived from the purchase price allocation in connection with our acquisition. |
Pro forma three-month ended March 31, 2011 compared to the pro forma three-months ended March
31, 2010.
Net sales
Net sales for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 were $11.5 million, an increase of $3.9
million or 50.7% compared to the same period in 2010. Domestic sales were approximately $3.4
million in the three months ended March 31,
26
Table of Contents
2011 compared to approximately $3.6 million in the same
period for 2010 as shipments to several large domestic consolidators decreased during the 2011
quarter. The number of domestic retail outlets ERGObabys products sold to increased from 689 as
of March 31, 2010 to 906 as of March 31, 2011. Excluding the impact of sales to consolidators in
each of the periods, domestic sales increased approximately 15.7% during the three-month period
ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. International sales were approximately
$8.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $4.1 million in 2010, an
increase of $4.0 million or 99.7%. This significant increase is primarily attributable to
continued increases in sales to distributors in Asia, principally Japan and Korea, and the
addition of new distributors during 2011 in Myanmar, Malaysia, the Caribbean, UAE and Mexico.
Baby carriers represented 88.5% of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
89.1% for the same period in 2010. The remaining net sales in each of the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 reflect accessory sales.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 were approximately $4.2 million compared
to $2.3 million in the same period of 2010. The increase of $1.9 million is due principally to
the increase in sales in the same period. Gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased from
70.0% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 to 63.6% in 2011. The decrease is attributable to: (i)
a greater percentage of organic baby carriers sold in 2011. Organic baby carriers are standard
baby carriers made with organic cotton and generate a lower gross profit margin of approximately
61%, compared to approximately 71% for standard carriers. 48.6% of baby carrier sales were
organic baby carriers in the first three months of 2011 compared to 46.3% in the same period of
2010; (ii) a greater percentage of net sales were international sales in the first three-months of
2011 compared to 2010. International sales generally carry a lower price point and as a result
generate lower gross profit margins. On average, the gross profit margin on international sales
are 59% compared to 72% for domestic sales.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 increased to
approximately $4.1 million or 36.0% of net sales compared to $2.4 million or 31.6% of net sales
for the same period of 2010. The increase of $1.7 million is attributable in part to an increase
of $0.5 million in a liability related to an earn-out provision with ERGObabys former owner as of
March 31, 2011. The earn-out provision provides for a payment to ERGObabys former owner of $2.0
million if net sales meet or exceed an agreed upon hurdle rate in calendar year 2011. As of March
31, 2011, we estimate that there is a 35% probability that the hurdle will be met, which is an
increase in the estimated probability of 10% utilized to calculate the liability as of December
31, 2010. The remaining increase in expenses during the three-months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same period in 2010 is due principally to increases in sales commissions,
marketing campaigns and personnel costs related to expansion initiatives and general overhead, in
order to support the current and anticipated increased sales volume.
Income from operations
Income from operations for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $0.3
million to $2.6 million compared to the same period in 2010 based principally on the factors
described above.
Fox Factory
Overview
Fox, headquartered in Watsonville, California, is a branded action sports company that designs,
manufactures and markets high-performance suspension products for mountain bikes and power sports,
which include: snowmobiles, motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles ATVs, and other off-road vehicles.
Foxs products are recognized by manufacturers and consumers as being among the most technically
advanced suspension products currently available in the marketplace. Foxs technical success is
demonstrated by its dominance of award winning performances by professional athletes across its
suspension products. As a result, Foxs suspension components are incorporated by original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers on their high-performance models at the top of their
product lines in the mountain bike and power sports sector. OEMs capitalize on the strength of
Foxs brand to maintain and expand their own sales and margins. In the Aftermarket segment,
customers seeking higher performance select Foxs suspension components to enhance their existing
equipment.
Fox sells to more than 200 OEM and 7,600 Aftermarket customers across its market segments. In each
of the years 2010, 2009 and 2008, approximately 78%, 76% and 76% of net sales were to OEM
customers. The remaining net sales were to Aftermarket customers.
27
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for Fox for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 42,880 | $ | 32,732 | ||||
Cost of sales |
29,903 | 23,258 | ||||||
Gross profit |
12,977 | 9,474 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
6,524 | 5,183 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
125 | 125 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
1,304 | 1,304 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 5,024 | $ | 2,862 | ||||
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Net sales
Net sales for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $10.1 million, or
31.0%, compared to the corresponding period in 2010. OEM sales increased $8.4 million to $34.0
million during the three-months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $25.6 million for the same period
in 2010. The increase in OEM net sales is attributable to increases in sales in the mountain
biking sector totaling $3.9 million (18.2%) and increases in sales in the powered vehicles sector
totaling approximately $4.5 million (107%). The increase in OEM sales in the mountain biking
sector during the three-months ended March 31, 2011 is due to inventory replenishment at OEMs
during the first quarter of 2011 that did not occur during 2010 due to greater inventory carry
over from 2009 resulting from the depressed sales volume in 2009. The significant increase in
OEM sales to the powered vehicle sector during the three-months ended March 31, 2011 is the result
of an increase in sales to Ford Motor Company for use in its F-150 Raptor Off-road pickup truck
and increases in sales of suspension components to the ATV market. Aftermarket sales increased
approximately $1.8 million to $8.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared
to $7.1 million in the same period in 2010. This increase is attributable to increases in
Aftermarket net sales in the powered vehicles sector totaling approximately $1.0 million and the
mountain biking sector totaling approximately $0.8 million.
International OEM and Aftermarket sales were $27.9 million during the three-months ended March 31,
2011 compared to $21.4 million during the same period in 2010, an increase of $6.5 million or
30.4%.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $6.6 million, or
28.6%, compared to the corresponding period in 2010. The increase in cost of sales is
attributable to the increase in net sales for the same period. Gross profit as a percentage of
sales was approximately 30.3% for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 28.9% for the
same period in 2010. The 1.4% increase in gross profit as a percentage of sales during 2011 is
attributable to positive leverage achieved due to the increased production volume as well as a
favorable product sales mix in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the 2010 quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased approximately $1.3 million during the
three-months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is the
result of increases in (i) marketing costs ($0.3 million), (ii) engineering costs ($0.5 million),
and (iii) other administrative costs ($0.5 million) during the three-months ended March 31, 2011,
compared to 2010, principally to support the significant increase in sales.
Income from operations
Income from operations for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $2.2
million to $5.0 million compared to the corresponding period in 2010, based principally on the
significant increase in net sales, offset in part by the increases in selling, general and
administrative costs, all as described above.
28
Table of Contents
Halo
Overview
Operating under the brand names of HALO and Lee Wayne, headquartered in Sterling, IL, HALO is an
independent provider of customized drop-ship promotional products in the U.S. Through an
extensive group of dedicated sales professionals, HALO serves as a one-stop shop for over 40,000
customers throughout the U.S. HALO is involved in the design, sourcing, management and
fulfillment of promotional products across several product categories, including apparel,
calendars, writing instruments, drink ware and office accessories. HALOs sales professionals
work with customers and vendors to develop the most effective means of communicating a logo or
marketing message to a target audience. Approximately 90% of products sold are drop shipped,
resulting in minimal inventory risk. HALO has established itself as a leader in the promotional
products and marketing industry through its focus on service through its approximately 870 account
executives.
HALO acquired the promotional products distributor Relay Gear in February 2010.
Distribution of promotional products is seasonal. Management estimates that HALO expects to
realize approximately 45% of its sales and 70% of its operating income in the months of September
through December, due principally to calendar sales and corporate holiday promotions.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the loss from operations data for HALO for the three month periods ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 32,686 | $ | 29,704 | ||||
Cost of sales |
19,946 | 17,974 | ||||||
Gross profit |
12,740 | 11,730 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
12,458 | 11,762 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
125 | 125 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
608 | 618 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (451 | ) | $ | (775 | ) | ||
Three-months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-months ended March 31, 2010.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $3.0 million or 10.0%
compared to the same period in 2010. Sales increases attributable to accounts acquired as part of
the Relay Gear acquisition in February 2010 accounted for approximately $0.4 million of the
increase in net sales in the three-months ended March 31, 2011, while sales to existing customers
increased by $2.6 million. Increased sales to many of our larger customer accounts for a majority
of the increase.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $2.0 million
compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in cost of sales is primarily attributable to the
corresponding increase in net sales for the same period. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales
totaled approximately 39.0% and 39.5% of net sales for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage for the three months ended March
31, 2011 is attributable to an unfavorable sales mix during the quarter compared to the same period
in 2010. A greater proportion of sales were to larger accounts, many which carry a lower margin.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased
approximately $0.7 million compared to the same period in 2010. Direct commission expenses
increased by approximately $0.5 million as a result of
29
Table of Contents
increased sales in 2011 together with an
increase of $0.2 million in other general and administrative expenses, mostly volume related.
Loss from operations
Loss from operations was approximately $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to a loss of approximately $0.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
improved operating results are principally due to the increase in net sales offset in part by
direct commission expense and a reduction in gross margins and other factors as described above.
Liberty Safe
Overview
Based in Payson, Utah and founded in 1988, Liberty Safe is the premier designer, manufacturer and
marketer of home and gun safes in North America. From its over 200,000 square foot manufacturing
facility, Liberty Safe produces a wide range of home and gun safe models in a broad assortment of
sizes, features and styles ranging from an entry level
product to good, better and best products. Products are marketed under the Liberty brand, as well
as a portfolio of licensed and private label brands, including Remington, Cabelas and John Deere.
Liberty Safes products are the market share leader and are sold through an independent dealer
network (Dealer sales) in addition to various sporting goods and home improvement retail outlets
(National sales). Liberty has the largest independent dealer network in the industry.
Historically, approximately 60% of Liberty Safes net sales are National sales and 40% are Dealer
sales.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for Liberty Safe for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2011 and the pro-forma income from operations for the three month period
ended March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
(pro-forma) | ||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 20,203 | $ | 15,933 | ||||
Cost of services |
15,174 | 11,126 | ||||||
Gross profit |
5,029 | 4,807 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense (a) |
2,714 | 1,822 | ||||||
Fees to manager (b) |
125 | 125 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles (c) |
1,294 | 1,294 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 896 | $ | 1,566 | ||||
Pro-forma results of operations of Liberty Safe for the three-month period ended March 31,
2010 includes the following pro-forma adjustments applied to historical results:
(a) | Selling, general and administrative costs were reduced by approximately $1.5 million in the three-months ended March 31, 2010, representing an adjustment for one-time transaction costs incurred as a result of our purchase. | |
(b) | Represents management fees that would have been payable to the Manager. | |
(c) | An increase in amortization of intangible assets totaling $1.3 million in 2010. This adjustment is a result of and was derived from the purchase price allocation in connection with our acquisition. |
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the pro-forma three months ended March 31, 2010.
Net sales
Net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $4.3 million or 26.8%
compared to the corresponding three month period ending March 31, 2010. National sales were
approximately $12.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $8.9 million in
the same period in 2010, representing an increase of $3.7 million or 41.6%. Dealer sales totaled
approximately $7.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $7.0 million in the
same period in 2010 representing an increase of $0.6 million or 8.6%. The increase in National
sales in 2011 is principally attributable to: (i) sales increases in connection with successfully
returning one of our customers to selling a Liberty branded product during the three-
30
Table of Contents
months ended
March 31, 2011 which accounted for approximately $1.5 million of the increase, and; (ii) sales
increases to Cabelas, an existing customer during the first quarter of 2011 resulting from Liberty
becoming the sole sourced provider of safes, which accounted for approximately $2.8 million of the
sales increase. These increases were offset in part by a decrease in sales to other National
account customers due to production capacity constraints.
The increase in Dealer sales of $0.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
the same period in 2010 is the result of across the board increased demand from our dealer network
which we attribute to our ongoing national radio advertising campaign, together with strong co-op
advertising by our dealers at the local level. Net sales at the Dealer level also suffered during
the three-months ended March 31, 2011 due to production capacity constraints.
Sales backorders totaled approximately $24.5 million at March 31, 2011 compared to $7.3
million at December 31, 2010. We anticipate production capacity constraint issues to continue
through the next two fiscal quarters and will begin to be relieved during the fourth quarter of
2011 with the delivery and installation of additional production equipment.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $4.0 million or
36.4%. The increase in cost of sales is primarily attributable to the increase in net sales for
the same period. Gross profit as a percentage of sales totaled approximately 24.9% and 30.2% of
net sales for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in gross
profit as a percentage of sales of 5.3% for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
same period in 2010 is attributable to: (i) higher raw material costs; (ii) higher transportation
costs, including costs associated with some inefficiencies in shipping in 2011 due to the
production capacity constraints, and: (iii) a one-time sales promotion allowance to a customer
during the first quarter of 2011 totaling $0.2 million. Liberty has recently announced a price
increase on its product line that will take effect at the end of the second fiscal quarter of 2011
which is intended to offset a majority of the margin degradation.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased by
approximately $0.9 million or 49% when compared to the same period in 2010. This increase is the
result of: (i) $0.3 million incurred in connection with Libertys national radio advertising
campaign during the first three months of 2011. We did not have this cost in the first quarter of
2010. ; (ii) increased sales commission expense ($0.3 million) resulting from the increase in net
sales; (iii) increased co-op advertising costs ($0.2 million).
Income from operations
Income from operations decreased approximately $0.7 million to $0.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 compared to $1.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, due
principally to those factors described above.
Staffmark
Overview
Staffmark, a national provider of contingent workforce solutions that serves the temporary staffing
needs of employers throughout the United States, provides a full spectrum of light industrial and
clerical staffing solutions. Staffmark has a client base of approximately 6,000 and currently
places over 40,000 temporary employees weekly in a broad range of industries.
Staffmark is focused on establishing and maintaining a leading position within the markets in which
it operates. It seeks to achieve this by winning its clients business one location at a time, and
leveraging that success into a broader relationship where we service multiple client locations. As
Staffmarks client relationships develop, it enhances its position within markets by: (i) hiring
additional sales and operations staff; (ii) opening branch and on-site locations; and (iii) making
strategic acquisitions. This strategy enables Staffmark to gain operating leverage in its markets,
raise the awareness of its brand and realize efficiencies of scale.
A closely monitored statistic within the temporary staffing industry is the temporary penetration
rate, which measures the percent of the total United States workforce that is temporary versus
full-time based on data from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. The temporary
penetration rate in March 2011 was 1.73%, up slightly from 1.69% in December 2010, representing the
highest level in thirty months.
On April 12, 2011, Staffmark filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission for a proposed initial public offering of its common stock.
31
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the loss from operations data for Staffmark for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Service revenues |
$ | 246,799 | $ | 217,402 | ||||
Cost of services |
214,850 | 188,526 | ||||||
Gross profit |
31,949 | 28,876 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
30,849 | 28,221 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
300 | 261 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
1,136 | 1,226 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (336 | ) | $ | (832 | ) | ||
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010
Service revenues
Service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased $29.4 million or 13.5% over
the corresponding three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase in revenues primarily reflects
increased demand for temporary staffing services. Temporary staffing service revenue increases in
light industrial ($22.2 million), clerical ($3.7 million) and managed services ($2.7 million) are
principally responsible for the increase. Direct hire revenue increased approximately $0.2
million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Cost of services
Direct cost of services for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased approximately $26.3
million or 14.0% compared to the same period a year ago. This increase is principally the direct
result of the increase in service revenues. Gross profit as a percentage of service revenue was
approximately 12.9% and 13.3% of revenues for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The majority of the decrease in the gross profit margin of approximately 40
basis points (bps) is principally the result of higher state unemployment tax rates in 2011
resulting from further increases in funding required for various states depleted unemployment
reserves, to the extent not recovered through pricing, offset in part (10bps) by the increased
gross profit provided by the increase in direct hire revenues. Gross profit as a percentage of
sales is historically lowest in the first fiscal quarter ended March 31 due to the front loading of
certain employment taxes. We expect gross profit margins to steadily increase through the
remainder of the year, although any increases in unemployment tax rates not fully recovered through
pricing will have an adverse effect on our gross profit margins in the future.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased
approximately $2.6 million compared to the same period a year ago. The increased costs incurred
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 2010 are attributable to increases in
overhead costs ($2.0 million), primarily in staffing expense, necessary to service the meaningful
increase in revenues and overall operations in the first quarter of 2011 and a non-recurring,
non-cash compensation charge related to a one-time cost for accelerating vesting rights in stock
options ($0.6 million). Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenues
was 12.5% during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 13.0% during the same period in
2010.
Loss from operations
Loss from operations was $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to a loss
from operations of $0.8 million in 2010, based principally on the factors described above.
Tridien
Overview
Tridien Medical, headquartered in Coral Springs, Florida, is a leading designer and manufacturer
of powered and non-powered medical therapeutic support services and patient positioning devices
serving the acute care, long-term care and
32
Table of Contents
home health care markets. Tridien is one of the
nations leading designers and manufacturers of specialty therapeutic support surfaces with
manufacturing operations in multiple locations to better serve a national customer base.
Tridien, together with its subsidiary companies, provides customers the opportunity to source
leading surface technologies from the designer and manufacturer.
Tridien develops products both independently and in partnership with large distribution
intermediaries. Medical distribution companies then sell or rent the therapeutic support surfaces,
sometimes in conjunction with bed frames and accessories to one of three end markets: (i) acute
care, (ii) long term care and (iii) home health care. The level of sophistication largely varies
for each product, as some patients require simple foam mattress beds (non-powered support
surfaces) while others may require electronically controlled, low air loss, lateral rotation,
pulmonary therapy or alternating pressure surfaces (powered support surfaces). The design,
engineering and manufacturing of all products are completed in-house (with the exception of
PrimaTech products, which are manufactured in Taiwan) and are FDA compliant.
Results of Operations
The table below summarizes the income from operations data for Tridien for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Three-months ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 13,853 | $ | 15,317 | ||||
Cost of sales |
10,043 | 10,676 | ||||||
Gross profit |
3,810 | 4,641 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
2,150 | 1,945 | ||||||
Fees to manager |
87 | 87 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
330 | 375 | ||||||
Income from operations |
$ | 1,243 | $ | 2,234 | ||||
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Net sales
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased approximately $1.5 million or 9.6%
over the corresponding three months ended March 31, 2010. Net sales of non-powered support surfaces
and patient positioning devices totaled $11.3 million in 2011 compared to $12.4 million during the
same period in 2010, a decrease of 1.1 million or 8.9%. Net sales of powered products totaled $2.6
million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $3.0 million in 2010, a decrease
of $0.4 million or 13.3%. Sales of non- powered support surface sales were lower in the first
quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 due to higher than normal sales in the first
quarter of 2010 as a result of $0.9 million in non-recurring sales to one customer who replaced
its rental product manufactured by another company with product manufactured by Tridien.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales decreased approximately $0.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same period of 2010 primarily as a result of the decrease in sales. Gross profit as
a percentage of sales was 27.5% in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 30.3% in the
corresponding period in 2010. The decrease of 2.8% in 2011 is principally due to increases in foam
costs, a major component in non-powered products, and the negative impact of selling price concessions made
to customers in 2011 in exchange for long term purchase commitments.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased
approximately $0.2 million compared to the same period of 2010. This increase is principally the
result of increased spending on engineering resources and research and development in an effort to
bring new and innovative products to market.
Income from operations
Income from operations decreased approximately $1.0 million to $1.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 compared to $2.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, due
principally to those factors described above.
33
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the three-months ended March 31, 2011, on a consolidated basis, cash flows provided by
operating activities totaled approximately $39.8 million, which represents a $23.4 million increase
compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. This increase is the result of the cash
generated at our business segments, specifically, Staffmark ($23.4 million), Advanced Circuits
($5.4 million), Fox ($5.2 million) and Liberty ($3.8 million). In each case the majority of the
operating cash was used to pay down their intercompany loans.
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled approximately $4.5 million, which reflects
maintenance capital expenditures of approximately $2.3 million and growth capital expenditures of
$2.2 million. The majority of the growth capital expenditures were spent at Liberty Safe in order
to increase in-house production capabilities.
Cash flows used in financing activities totaled approximately $31.7 million, principally
reflecting: (i) distributions paid to shareholders during the quarter totaling approximately $15.9
million; (ii) repayments of our Term Loan Facility of $0.5 million; and (iii) repayments on our
Revolving Credit Facility totaling $15.0 million.
At March 31, 2011 we had approximately $17.1 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand. The
majority of our cash is in non-interest bearing checking accounts or invested in short-term money
market accounts and is maintained in accordance with the Companys investment policy, which
identifies allowable investments and specifies credit quality standards.
As of March 31, 2011, we had the following outstanding loans due from each of our businesses:
| Advanced Circuits $79.7 million; | |
| American Furniture $22.7 million; | |
| ERGObaby $46.4 million; | |
| Fox $30.5 million; | |
| HALO $44.6 million; | |
| Liberty $38.9 million; | |
| Staffmark $52.7 million; and | |
| Tridien $5.3 million. | |
. |
Each loan to our businesses has a scheduled maturity and each business is entitled to repay all or
a portion of the principal amount of the outstanding loans, without penalty, prior to maturity.
Our primary source of cash is from the receipt of interest and principal on the outstanding loans
to our businesses. Accordingly, we are dependent upon the earnings of and cash flow from these
businesses, which are available for (i) operating expenses; (ii) payment of principal and interest
under our Credit Agreement; (iii) payments to CGM due pursuant to the Management Services
Agreement, the LLC Agreement, and the Supplemental Put Agreement; (iv) cash distributions to our
shareholders; and (v) investments in future acquisitions. Payments made under (iii) above are
required to be paid before distributions to shareholders and may be significant and exceed the
funds held by us, which may require us to dispose of assets or incur debt to fund such
expenditures.
We incurred non-cash charges to earnings of approximately $3.2 million during the three-months
ended March 31, 2011 in order to recognize an increase in our estimated liability in connection
with the Supplemental Put Agreement between us and CGM. A liability of approximately $47.8 million
is reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheet, which represents our estimated liability
for this obligation at March 31, 2011.
The current portion of the supplemental put liability of $6.3 million represents an accrual for the
contribution-based profit allocation we expect will be paid to our Manager during the third quarter
of 2011. The Manager can elect to receive the positive contribution-based profit allocation
payment for each of our business acquisitions during the 30-day period following the fifth
anniversary of the date upon which we acquired a controlling interest in that business. This
aforementioned accrual represents the contribution-based profit for the fifth anniversary date of
Advanced Circuits and reduces the supplemental put liability when paid.
34
Table of Contents
The following table provides the contribution-based profit for each of the businesses we control at
March 31, 2011 and the respective quarter end in which each five year anniversary occurs,
reconciled to the total supplemental put liability:
Contribution | ||||||
based profit | ||||||
allocation | Quarter End of | |||||
accrual at | Fifth Anniversary | |||||
(in thousands) | Mar. 31, 2011 | Date of Acquisition | ||||
Advanced Circuits |
$ | 6,300 | June 30, 2011 | |||
American Furniture |
(6,947 | ) | September 30, 2012 | |||
ERGObaby |
(47 | ) | September 30, 2015 | |||
FOX |
2,609 | March 31, 2013 | ||||
HALO |
38 | March 31, 2012 | ||||
Liberty |
(334 | ) | March 31, 2015 | |||
Staffmark |
(5,257 | ) | June 30, 2011 | |||
Tridien |
(122 | ) | September 30, 2011 | |||
Total contribution-based profit portion |
$ | (3,760 | ) | |||
Estimated gain on sale portion |
51,586 | |||||
Total supplemental put liability |
$ | 47,826 | ||||
We believe that we currently have sufficient liquidity and resources to meet our existing
obligations, including quarterly distributions to our shareholders, as approved by our Board of
Directors, over the next twelve months. The quarterly distribution for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 was paid on April 12, 2011 and was $16,821. We have considered the impact of
recent market instability and credit availability in assessing the adequacy of our liquidity and
capital resources.
Our Credit Agreement provides for a Revolving Credit Facility totaling $340 million which matures
in December 2012 and a Term Loan Facility totaling $73.5 million, which matures in December 2013.
The Term Loan Facility requires quarterly payments of $0.5 million which commenced March 31, 2008,
with a final payment of the outstanding principal balance due on December 7, 2013.
At March 31, 2011 we had $7.0 million in outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit
Facility. We repaid $15.0 million on the Revolving Credit Facility during the first quarter of
2011.
We had approximately $253.6 million in borrowing base availability under this facility at March 31,
2011. Letters of Credit totaling $68.9 million were outstanding at March 31, 2011. We currently
have no exposure to failed financial institutions.
The following table reflects required and actual financial ratios as of March 31, 2011 included
as part of the affirmative covenants in our Credit Agreement:
Description of Required Covenant Ratio | Covenant Ratio Requirement | Actual Ratio | ||
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
|
greater than or equal to 1.5:1.0 | 5.9:1.0 | ||
Interest Coverage Ratio
|
greater than or equal to 2.75:1.0 | 10.0:1.0 | ||
Leverage Ratio
|
less than or equal to 3.5:1.0 | 1.0:1.0 |
We intend to use the availability under our Credit Agreement and cash on hand to pursue
acquisitions of additional businesses to the extent permitted under our Credit Agreement, to fund
distributions and to provide for other working capital needs.
35
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
From time to time we may publicly disclose certain non-GAAP financial measures in the course of
our investor presentations, earnings releases, earnings conference calls or other venues. A
non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of historical or future performance, financial
position or cash flow that excludes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that effectively exclude
amounts, included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance
with GAAP in our financial statements, and vice versa for measures that include amounts, or are
subject to adjustments that effectively include amounts, that are excluded from the most directly
comparable measure as calculated and presented. GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States.
Non-GAAP financial measures are provided as additional information to investors in order to provide
them with an alternative method for assessing our financial condition and operating results. These
measures are not meant to be a substitute for GAAP, and may be different from or otherwise
inconsistent with non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.
The tables below reconcile the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures to EBITDA,
Adjusted EBITDA, and Cash Flow Available for Distribution and Reinvestment (CAD).
Reconciliation of Net income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA Earnings before Interest, Income Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) is
calculated as net income (loss) before interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation
expense and amortization expense. Amortization expenses consist of amortization of intangibles and
debt charges, including debt issuance costs, discounts, etc.
Adjusted EBITDA Is calculated utilizing the same calculation as described above in arriving at
EBITDA further adjusted by; (i) non-controlling stockholder compensation, which generally consists
of non-cash stock option expense; (ii) successful acquisition costs, which consist of transaction
costs (legal, accounting , due diligences, etc,) incurred in connection with the successful
acquisition of a business expensed during the period in compliance with ASC 805;(iii) increases or
decreases in supplemental put charges, which reflect the estimated potential liability due to our
manager that requires us to acquire their allocation interests in the Company at a price based on a
percentage of the fair value in our businesses over their original basis plus a hurdle rate.
Essentially, when the fair value of our businesses increase we will incur additional supplemental
put charges and vice versa when the fair value of our businesses decrease; (iv) management fees,
which reflect fees due quarterly to our manager in connection with our Management Services
Agreement (MSA); (v) impairment charges, which reflect write downs to goodwill or other
intangible assets and (vi) gains or losses recorded in connection with the sale of fixed assets.
We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and reflect
important financial measures as they exclude the effects of items which reflect the impact of
long-term investment decisions, rather than the performance of near term operations. When compared
to net income (loss) these financial measures are limited in that they do not reflect the periodic
costs of certain capital assets used in generating revenues of our businesses or the non-cash
charges associated with impairments. This presentation also allows investors to view the
performance of our businesses in a manner similar to the methods used by us and the management of
our businesses, provides additional insight into our operating results and provides a measure for
evaluating targeted businesses for acquisition.
We believe these measurements are also useful in measuring our ability to service debt and other
payment obligations. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not meant to be a substitute for GAAP, and may
be different from or otherwise inconsistent with non-GAAP financial measures used by other
companies.
The following table reconciles EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), which we consider
to be the most comparable GAAP financial measure (in thousands):
36
Table of Contents
Adjusted EBITDA
Three-months ended March 31, 2011
Three-months ended March 31, 2011
Advanced | American | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Corporate | Circuits | Furniture | ERGO baby | HALO | Fox | Liberty | Staffmark | Tridien | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (6,567 | ) | $ | (4,219 | ) | $ | 3,353 | $ | (7,801 | ) | $ | 680 | $ | (737 | ) | $ | 2,800 | $ | (155 | ) | $ | (1,209 | ) | $ | 721 | $ | (6,567 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted for: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
2,420 | (490 | ) | 2,068 | (1,160 | ) | 428 | (278 | ) | 1,653 | (38 | ) | (197 | ) | 434 | 2,420 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
2,537 | 2,060 | (1 | ) | 7 | 13 | | | | 458 | | 2,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest |
| (6,249 | ) | 1,569 | 604 | 1,186 | 519 | 458 | 1,068 | 764 | 81 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,773 | 953 | 1,193 | 1,115 | 764 | 852 | 1,677 | 1,635 | 1,991 | 593 | 10,773 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 9,163 | $ | (7,945 | ) | $ | 8,182 | $ | (7,235 | ) | $ | 3,071 | $ | 356 | $ | 6,588 | $ | 2,510 | $ | 1,807 | $ | 1,829 | $ | 9,163 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets |
53 | | | (13 | ) | | | 61 | 1 | 4 | | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling stockholder compensation |
852 | (600 | ) | | 56 | 68 | | 196 | 65 | 1,052 | 15 | 852 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
7,700 | | | 7,700 | | | | | | | 7,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in earnout probability |
500 | | | | 500 | | | | | | 500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental put |
3,228 | 3,228 | | | | | | | | | 3,228 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management fees |
3,843 | 2,705 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 300 | 88 | 3,843 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 25,339 | $ | (2,612 | ) | $ | 8,307 | $ | 633 | $ | 3,764 | $ | 481 | $ | 6,970 | $ | 2,701 | $ | 3,163 | $ | 1,932 | $ | 25,339 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA
Three-months ended March 31, 2010
Three-months ended March 31, 2010
Advanced | American | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Corporate | Circuits | Furniture | ERGO baby | HALO | Fox | Liberty | Staffmark | Tridien | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (15,287 | ) | $ | (17,741 | ) | $ | 169 | $ | 659 | $ | | $ | (990 | ) | $ | 1,446 | $ | (1,450 | ) | $ | 1,345 | $ | 1,275 | $ | (15,287 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Adjusted for: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(2,812 | ) | (554 | ) | 88 | 404 | | (510 | ) | 769 | | (3,790 | ) | 781 | (2,812 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
2,686 | 2,227 | (1 | ) | 4 | | | | | 456 | | 2,686 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest |
| (4,883 | ) | 654 | 1,585 | | 675 | 593 | | 1,207 | 169 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,423 | 1,545 | 940 | 835 | | 882 | 1,581 | | 2,021 | 619 | 8,423 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | (6,990 | ) | $ | (19,406 | ) | $ | 1,850 | $ | 3,487 | $ | | $ | 57 | $ | 4,389 | $ | (1,450 | ) | $ | 1,239 | $ | 2,844 | $ | (6,990 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets |
(2 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | | | 1 | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling stockholder compensation |
4,370 | 50 | 3,774 | 54 | | | 92 | | 370 | 30 | 4,370 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition expenses |
1,789 | | 280 | | | 59 | | 1,450 | | | 1,789 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supplemental put |
14,426 | 14,426 | | | | | | | | | 14,426 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management fees |
3,664 | 2,815 | 125 | 125 | | 125 | 125 | | 261 | 88 | 3,664 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 17,257 | $ | (2,115 | ) | $ | 6,029 | $ | 3,663 | $ | | $ | 241 | $ | 4,606 | $ | | $ | 1,871 | $ | 2,962 | $ | 17,257 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of Net income (Loss) to CAD
CAD is a non-GAAP measure that we believe provides additional, useful information to evaluate our
ability to make anticipated quarterly distributions. CAD is not meant to be a substitute for GAAP,
and may be different from or otherwise inconsistent with non-GAAP financial measures used by other
companies.
The following table reconciles cash receipts and payments that are not reflected on our income
statement to net loss and cash flows provided by operating activities, which we consider the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measures in order to provide an additional measure of manage
estimate of CAD.
Three months ended | Three months ended | |||||||
(in thousands) | March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (6,567 | ) | $ | (15,287 | ) | ||
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,314 | 8,005 | ||||||
Supplemental put expense |
3,228 | 14,426 | ||||||
Noncontrolling stockholder charges and other |
1,144 | 4,160 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
(993 | ) | (2,121 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
459 | 418 | ||||||
Impairment expense |
7,700 | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
24,473 | 6,778 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
39,758 | 16,379 | ||||||
Add (deduct): |
||||||||
Unused fee on revolving credit facility (1) |
776 | 842 | ||||||
Successful acquisition expense (2) |
500 | 1,789 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(24,473 | ) | (6,778 | ) | ||||
Less: |
||||||||
Maintenance capital expenditures (3): |
||||||||
Advanced Circuits |
57 | 40 | ||||||
American Furniture |
(52 | ) | 12 | |||||
ERGObaby |
185 | | ||||||
Fox |
140 | 151 | ||||||
HALO |
448 | 89 | ||||||
Liberty |
218 | | ||||||
Staffmark |
834 | 482 | ||||||
Tridien |
437 | 176 | ||||||
Estimated cash flow available for distribution |
$ | 14,294 | $ | 11,282 | ||||
Distribution April 2011 and 2010 |
$ | 16,821 | $ | 14,238 | ||||
(1) | Represents the commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. | |
(2) | Represents transaction costs for successful acquisitions that were expensed during the period. | |
(3) | Excludes growth capital expenditures of approximately $2.2 million in 2011. |
Table of Contents
Cash flows of certain of our businesses are seasonal in nature. Earnings from AFM are
typically highest in the months of January through April of each year, coinciding with homeowners
tax refunds. Cash flows from Staffmark are typically lower in the first quarter of each year than
in other quarters due to: (i) reduced seasonal demand for temporary staffing services and (ii)
lower gross margins earned during that period due to the front-end loading of certain payroll taxes
and other costs associated with payroll paid to our employees. Cash flows from HALO are typically
highest in the months of September through December of each year primarily as the result of
calendar sales and holiday promotions. HALO generates approximately two-thirds of its operating
income in the months of September through December. Revenue and earnings from Fox are typically
highest in the third quarter, coinciding with the delivery of product for the new bike year.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no special purpose entities or off balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases
entered into in the ordinary course of business.
Long-term contractual obligations, except for our long-term debt obligations, are generally not
recognized in our consolidated balance sheet. Non-cancelable purchase obligations are obligations
we incur during the normal course of business, based on projected needs.
The table below summarizes the payment schedule of our contractual obligations at March 31, 2011:
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations (a) |
$ | 97,775 | $ | 10,467 | $ | 87,308 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
711 | 245 | 455 | 11 | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (b) |
61,915 | 12,202 | 19,409 | 11,757 | 18,547 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (c) |
187,251 | 117,420 | 36,431 | 33,400 | | |||||||||||||||
Supplemental put obligation (d) |
41,526 | | 2,603 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 140,334 | $ | 146,206 | $ | 45,168 | $ | 18,547 | ||||||||||||
(a) | Reflects commitment fees and letter of credit fees under our Revolving Credit Facility and amounts due, together with interest on our Term Loan Facility. | |
(b) | Reflects various operating leases for office space, manufacturing facilities and equipment from third parties with various lease terms running from one to fourteen years. | |
(c) | Reflects non-cancelable commitments as of March 31, 2011, including: (i) shareholder distributions of $67.3 million, (ii) management fees of $16.7 million per year over the next five years and, (iii) other obligations, including amounts due under employment agreements. Distributions to our shareholders are approved by our Board of Directors each quarter. The amount ultimately approved as future quarterly distributions may differ from the amount included in this schedule. | |
(d) | The supplemental put obligation represents the estimated long term liability, accrued as if our management services agreement with CGM had been terminated. This agreement has not been terminated and there is no basis upon which to determine a date in the future, if any, that the estimated gain on sale portion will be paid. The Manager can elect to receive the positive contribution-based profit allocation payment for each of our business acquisitions during the 30-day period following the fifth anniversary of the date upon which we acquired a controlling interest in that business. See Liquidity and capital resources. |
The table does not include the long-term portion of the actuarially developed reserve for workers
compensation, included as a component of long-term liabilities, which does not provide for annual
estimated payments beyond one year.
39
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to adopt
accounting policies and make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates
under different assumptions and judgments and uncertainties, and potentially could result in
materially different results under different conditions. These critical accounting estimates are
reviewed periodically by our independent auditors and the audit committee of our board of
directors.
2011 Annual goodwill impairment testing
We conducted our annual goodwill impairment testing as of March 31, 2011. At each of our
reporting units tested, the units fair value exceeded carrying value with the exception of
American Furniture. The carrying amount of American Furniture exceeded its fair value due to the
significant decrease in revenue and operating profit at American Furniture resulting from the
negative impact on the promotional furniture market due to the significant decline in the U.S.
housing market, high unemployment rates and aggressive pricing employed by our competitors. As a
result of the carrying amount of goodwill exceeding its fair value, we recorded a $5.9 million
impairment charge as of March 31, 2011 which represented the remaining balance of goodwill on
American Furnitures balance sheet. We recorded a goodwill impairment charge totaling $35.5
million in the third quarter of 2010.
The carrying amount of American Furniture exceeded its fair value at March 31, 2011 by a
significant amount due primarily to the significant decrease in revenue and operating profit
together with managements revised outlook on near term operating results. Further, the
preliminary results of this analysis indicated that the carrying value of American Furnitures
trade name exceeded its fair value by approximately $1.8 million. The fair value of the American
Furniture trade name was determined by applying the relief from royalty technique to forecasted
revenues at the American Furniture reporting unit.
The impairment charge related to our American Furniture reporting unit reflects the preliminary
result from the impairment analysis performed and is subject to finalization of certain fair value
estimates being performed with the assistance of an outside independent valuation specialist, and
may be adjusted when all aspects of the analysis are completed. We expect to finalize our goodwill
impairment analysis during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Any adjustments to our estimate of
impairment as a result of completion of this evaluation are currently expected to be recorded in
our consolidated financial statements in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
Of the remaining seven reporting units as of March 31, 2011 the fair value of one of the reporting
units was not substantially in excess of its carrying value. Information from the preliminary
step-one impairment test for this reporting unit is as follows:
Reporting Unit | Percentage fair value of goodwill exceeds carrying value | Carrying value of goodwill @ March 31, 2011 | ||||
HALO
|
9.7 | % | $39.2 million |
A one percent increase in the discount rate, from 13% to 14%, would have impacted the fair value of
HALO by approximately $5.0 million and would have required us to perform a step-two analysis that
may have resulted in an impairment charge for HALO as of March 31, 2011. Factors that could
potentially trigger a subsequent interim impairment review in the future and possible impairment
loss at our HALO reporting unit include significant underperformance relative to future operating
results or significant negative industry or economic trends.
Other than described above, the estimates employed and judgment used in determining critical
accounting estimates have not changed significantly from those disclosed in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the SEC.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to footnote C to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
40
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no significant changes to our market risk since December 31, 2010. For a
discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), Holdings Regular Trustees and the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of Holdings and the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of March 31, 2011. Based on that
evaluation, the Regular Trustees of Holdings and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company concluded that Holdings and the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d), Holdings Regular
Trustees and the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, concluded that no changes in Holdings or the Companys internal control
over financial reporting occurred during the first quarter of 2011 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Holdings and the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
41
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Legal proceedings associated with the Companys and Holdings business together with legal
proceedings for the initial businesses have not changed materially from those disclosed in Part I,
Item 3 of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 10, 2011.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk factors and uncertainties associated with the Companys and Holdings business have not
changed materially from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K
as filed with the SEC on March 10, 2011.
42
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description | |||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant |
|||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
|||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant |
|||
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
43
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMPASS DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS |
||||
By: | /s/ James J. Bottiglieri | |||
James J. Bottiglieri | ||||
Regular Trustee | ||||
Date: May 9, 2011
44
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COMPASS GROUP DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS LLC |
||||
By: | /s/ James J. Bottiglieri | |||
James J. Bottiglieri | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||||
Date: May 9, 2011
45
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant |
|||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
|||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant |
|||
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant |
46