Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 |
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transaction period from _________________________ to _________________________ |
Commission File Number: 0-25248
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
CAYMAN ISLANDS | N/A | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Regatta Office Park Windward Three, 4th Floor, West Bay Road P.O. Box 1114 Grand Cayman KY1-1102 Cayman Islands |
N/A | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(345) 945-4277
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May 5, 2008, 14,519,508 shares of the registrants common stock, with US$0.60 par value, were
outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
NOTE REGARDING CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATES
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to $ or US$ are to United States dollars.
The exchange rate for conversion of Cayman Island dollars (CI$) into US$, as determined by the
Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, has been fixed since April 1974 at US$1.20 per CI$1.00.
The exchange rate for conversion of Belize dollars (BZE$) into US$, as determined by the Central
Bank of Belize, has been fixed since 1976 at US$ 0.50 per BZE$1.00.
The exchange rate for conversion of Bahamian dollars (BAH$) into US$, as determined by the Central
Bank of The Bahamas, has been fixed since 1973 at US$1.00 per BAH$1.00.
The official currency of the British Virgin Islands is the United States dollar.
The exchange rate for conversion of Bermuda dollars (BMD$) into US$ as determined by the Bermuda
Monetary Authority, has been fixed since 1970 at US$1.00 per BMD$1.00.
3
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 39,753,270 | $ | 38,529,383 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
9,654,491 | 9,828,529 | ||||||
Inventory |
3,968,679 | 3,649,991 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
999,029 | 1,411,231 | ||||||
Current portion of loans receivable |
904,425 | 947,854 | ||||||
Total current assets |
55,279,894 | 54,366,988 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
59,229,878 | 59,981,514 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
5,181,557 | 4,989,779 | ||||||
Loans receivable |
2,133,350 | 2,329,262 | ||||||
Investment in and loan to affiliate |
16,698,741 | 17,501,848 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
2,684,735 | 2,881,900 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,587,754 | 3,587,754 | ||||||
Other assets |
3,722,145 | 3,691,839 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 148,518,054 | $ | 149,330,884 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable and other current liabilities |
$ | 3,258,398 | $ | 4,996,728 | ||||
Dividends payable |
1,005,793 | 60,719 | ||||||
Current portion of long term debt |
1,163,368 | 1,142,255 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
5,427,559 | 6,199,702 | ||||||
Long term debt |
22,059,459 | 22,358,338 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
470,510 | 476,136 | ||||||
Minority interest in subsidiary |
1,372,575 | 1,392,254 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
29,330,103 | 30,426,430 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Controlling interests: |
||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock, $0.60 par value. Authorized 200,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 20,270 and 21,082 shares, respectively |
12,163 | 12,650 | ||||||
Class A common stock, $0.60 par value. Authorized 19,655,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 14,518,860 and 14,507,486 shares, respectively |
8,711,315 | 8,704,492 | ||||||
Class B common stock, $0.60 par value. Authorized 145,000 shares;
none issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
80,239,317 | 79,771,093 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
29,714,462 | 29,853,720 | ||||||
118,677,257 | 118,341,955 | |||||||
Non-controlling interests |
510,694 | 562,499 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
119,187,951 | 118,904,454 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 148,518,054 | $ | 149,330,884 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Retail water revenues |
$ | 5,010,511 | $ | 5,104,210 | ||||
Bulk water revenues |
6,167,324 | 5,227,521 | ||||||
Services revenues |
1,557,894 | 2,402,879 | ||||||
Total revenues |
12,735,729 | 12,734,610 | ||||||
Cost of retail revenues |
1,744,170 | 1,763,316 | ||||||
Cost of bulk revenues |
5,139,285 | 3,888,962 | ||||||
Cost of services revenues |
1,316,216 | 1,778,977 | ||||||
Total cost of revenues |
8,199,671 | 7,431,255 | ||||||
Gross profit |
4,536,058 | 5,303,355 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
2,466,592 | 2,339,181 | ||||||
Income from operations |
2,069,466 | 2,964,174 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest income |
452,690 | 448,804 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(446,558 | ) | (480,928 | ) | ||||
Other income |
19,855 | 203,331 | ||||||
Equity in earnings (loss) of affiliate |
(493,070 | ) | 459,123 | |||||
Other income (expense), net |
(467,083 | ) | 630,330 | |||||
Income before non-controlling and minority interests |
1,602,383 | 3,594,504 | ||||||
Income (loss) attributable to non-controlling and minority interests |
(71,484 | ) | 7,026 | |||||
Net income |
$ | 1,673,867 | $ | 3,587,478 | ||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.25 | ||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.065 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of: |
||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
14,507,897 | 14,141,620 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
14,532,303 | 14,377,695 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 3,118,722 | $ | 1,902,805 | ||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and construction in progress |
(1,202,395 | ) | (1,915,190 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
| 430,629 | ||||||
Distribution of income from affiliate |
| 189,375 | ||||||
Collections on loans receivable |
489,341 | 183,490 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(713,054 | ) | (1,111,696 | ) | ||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
||||||||
Dividends paid |
(868,052 | ) | (849,005 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercises of stock options |
| 2,237,773 | ||||||
Principal repayments of long term debt |
(313,729 | ) | (350,645 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(1,181,781 | ) | 1,038,123 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
1,223,887 | 1,829,232 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
38,529,383 | 37,310,699 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 39,753,270 | $ | 39,139,931 | ||||
Interest paid in cash |
$ | 399,791 | $ | 606,909 | ||||
Interest received in cash |
$ | 391,996 | $ | 476,192 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Conversion of 812 (2007: 1,014) redeemable preferred shares
into 812 (2007: 1,014) common shares |
$ | 487 | $ | 608 | ||||
Issuance of 10,562 (2007: 4,664) common shares to senior management for
services rendered |
$ | 266,461 | $ | 114,305 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (the Company)
include the accounts of the Companys (i) wholly-owned subsidiaries Aquilex, Inc., Cayman Water
Company Limited, Consolidated Water (Belize) Limited, Ocean Conversion (Cayman) Limited, DesalCo
Limited; (ii) majority-owned subsidiary Consolidated Water (Bahamas) Ltd.; and (iii) affiliate,
Consolidated Water (Bermuda) Limited, which is consolidated pursuant to the provisions of FASB
Interpretation 46(R). The Companys investment in its affiliate Ocean Conversion (BVI) Ltd.
(OC-BVI) is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2008 and the consolidated statements of
income and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 are unaudited. These
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which are of a normal recurring nature)
that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Companys financial
position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods presented. The results of
operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for
future periods, including the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
These consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relating to interim
financial statements and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Certain amounts previously presented in the financial statements of prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.
7
Table of Contents
2. Stock based compensation
The Company issues stock under incentive plans that form part of employees and non-executive
directors remuneration. The Company also grants options to purchase common shares as part of
remuneration for certain long-serving employees.
Stock-based compensation totaled $175,121 and $54,270 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statements of income.
In November 2007 and February 2008, the Company granted options to purchase 84,150 and 17,505
ordinary shares, respectively, to certain employees subject to the Companys shareholders approval
of the 2008 Equity Plan at the Annual General Meeting to be held on May 14, 2008. The November
2007 options began vesting on January 1, 2008 and vest in three equal tranches on January 1, 2009,
2010 and 2011 and the February 2008 options began vesting on January 1, 2008 and vest in three
equal tranches on February 10, 2009, 2010 and 2011. All of these 101,655 options expire three
years from the applicable vesting date.
Under Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R) Share-Based Payments (SFAS No.
123(R)), the Company estimated the fair value of the stock options granted and rights to acquire
stock using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company makes a number of estimates and
assumptions related to SFAS No. 123(R) including forfeiture rate, volatility and expected life.
The Company does not expect any forfeitures and therefore expects to recognize the full
compensation costs for these equity awards. The Company calculated expected volatility based
primarily upon the historical volatility of the Companys common stock.
The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding, which incorporates the contractual terms, grant vesting schedules and
terms and expected employee behaviors. As the Company has so far only awarded plain vanilla
options as described by the SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107), the Company
used the simplified method for determining the expected life of the options granted. Originally,
under SAB No. 107, this method was allowed until December 31, 2007. However, on December 21, 2007,
the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (SAB No. 110), which will allow a company to
continue to use the simplified method under certain circumstances, which the Company will
continue to use as the Company does not have sufficient, historical data to estimate the expected
term of equity awards.
The significant weighted average assumptions for the 101,655 ordinary share options for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 were as follows: Risk free interest rate of 3.03%; Expected option life
of 3.5 years; Expected volatility of 44.4%; Expected dividend yield of 0.90%.
A summary of stock option activity under the Companys SFAS No. 123(R) share-based compensation
plans for the three months ended March 31, 2008 is presented in the following table:
Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average | Contractual Life | Aggregate Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||||||
Options | Exercise Price | (Years) | Value (1) | |||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
21,465 | $ | 19.50 | |||||||||||||||||
Granted |
101,655 | 29.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding as of March 31, 2008 |
123,120 | $ | 27.56 | 4.21 | years | $ | 84,450 | |||||||||||||
Exercisable as of March 31, 2008 |
| $ | | | years | $ | | |||||||||||||
(1) | The intrinsic value of a stock option represents the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock, measured by reference to the closing price of the ordinary shares of $22.03 in the NASDAQ Global Select Market on March 31, 2008, exceeds the exercise price of the option. |
8
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2008, 123,120 non-vested options were outstanding with a weighted average exercise
price of $27.56 and an average remaining contractual life of 4.21 years. The total remaining
unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock-based arrangements was $897,710 as of
March 31, 2008 and are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.21 years.
As of March 31, 2008, unrecognized compensation costs relating to convertible preference shares
outstanding were $99,733 and are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.94
years.
3. Segment information
Under SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the
Company considers its (i) operations to supply water to retail customers, (ii) operations to
supply water to bulk customers, and (iii) providing of engineering, management and construction
services, as separate business segments.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Retail | Bulk | Services | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 5,010,511 | $ | 6,167,324 | $ | 1,557,894 | $ | 12,735,729 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues |
1,744,170 | 5,139,285 | 1,316,216 | 8,199,671 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,266,341 | 1,028,039 | 241,678 | 4,536,058 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
2,039,853 | 376,186 | 50,553 | 2,466,592 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
1,226,488 | 651,853 | 191,125 | 2,069,466 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(467,083 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income before non-controlling and minority interests |
1,602,383 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to non-controlling and
minority interests |
(71,484 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,673,867 | ||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Property plant and equipment, net |
$ | 23,212,707 | $ | 33,831,795 | $ | 2,185,376 | $ | 59,229,878 | ||||||||
Construction in progress |
3,080,446 | 2,101,111 | | 5,181,557 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
89,334,605 | 55,304,688 | 3,878,761 | 148,518,054 |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Retail | Bulk | Services | Total | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 5,104,210 | $ | 5,227,521 | $ | 2,402,879 | $ | 12,734,610 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues |
1,763,316 | 3,888,962 | 1,778,977 | 7,431,255 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,340,894 | 1,338,559 | 623,902 | 5,303,355 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
1,959,593 | 341,767 | 37,821 | 2,339,181 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
1,381,301 | 996,792 | 586,081 | 2,964,174 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
630,330 | |||||||||||||||
Income before non-controlling and minority interests |
3,594,504 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to non-controlling and
minority interests |
7,026 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,587,478 | ||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||
Property plant and equipment, net |
$ | 20,450,779 | $ | 36,530,224 | $ | 2,486,446 | $ | 59,467,449 | ||||||||
Construction in progress |
2,988,764 | 565,275 | 202,994 | 3,757,033 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
85,742,864 | 52,145,900 | 5,288,762 | 143,177,526 |
9
Table of Contents
4. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The
computation of diluted EPS assumes the issuance of common shares for all dilutive-potential stock
options and convertible preference shares outstanding during the reporting period. In addition, the
dilutive effect of stock options is considered in earnings per share calculations using the
treasury stock method.
The following summarizes information related to the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,673,867 | $ | 3,587,478 | ||||
Less: |
||||||||
Dividends declared and earnings attributable to preferred shares |
(2,612 | ) | (1,853 | ) | ||||
Net income available to holders of common shares in the determination of
basic and diluted earnings per share |
$ | 1,671,255 | $ | 3,585,625 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of
basic earnings per common share |
14,507,897 | 14,141,620 | ||||||
Plus: |
||||||||
Weighted average number of preferred shares outstanding during the period |
20,904 | 24,206 | ||||||
Potential dilutive effect of unexercised options |
3,502 | 211,869 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of
diluted earnings per common share |
14,532,303 | 14,377,695 | ||||||
5. Consolidated Water (Bermuda) Limited
In June 2006, the Company formed a Bermuda-based affiliate, Consolidated Water (Bermuda) Limited
(CW-Bermuda) with two other shareholders. The Company owns 40% of the equity interest and voting
rights of CW-Bermuda. In January 2007, CW-Bermuda entered into a contract with the Government of
Bermuda for the design, construction and sale of a desalination plant to be located on Tynes Bay
along the northern coast of Bermuda. Under the agreement, CW-Bermuda will construct the plant and
operate it for 12 months after its commissioning and sale to the Government of Bermuda. CW-Bermuda
will receive approximately $10.7 million in revenues under the contract for the construction of the
plant and its operation.
The Company has entered into a management services agreement with CW-Bermuda for the design,
construction and operation of the Tynes Bay plant, under which it receives fees for direct
services, purchasing activities and proprietary technology. The Company will also loan CW-Bermuda
up to $7.5 million under a credit facility to construct the plant. As of March 31, 2008, $451,000
was receivable from our Bermuda affiliate and our remaining loan commitment under this facility was
approximately $7.0 million.
In March 2008, CW-Bermuda reached an agreement with the Government of Bermuda to expand the
capacity of the plant from 600,000 U.S. gallons per day to 1.2 million U.S. gallons per day. The
Company does not expect to provide any additional funding to CW-Bermuda under the credit facility
because of this plant expansion.
Because (i) the equity investment in CW-Bermuda is not sufficient to permit it to finance its
activities without the loan from the Company; (ii) the other investors in CW-Bermuda have no
obligation to absorb any significant amount of its losses should losses arise; and (iii) the
Company expects economic benefits from CW-Bermuda that are significantly greater than the Companys
voting rights of 40%, CW-Bermuda constitutes a variable interest entity (VIE) as defined by FIN
46(R). The Company is the primary beneficiary of CW-Bermuda and, accordingly, consolidates the
results of CW-Bermuda in its financial statements as required under FIN 46(R). The consolidated
assets and liabilities of CW-Bermuda amounted to approximately $1,543,000 and $766,000,
respectively, as of March 31, 2008. There are no guarantees related to this variable interest, and
any creditors of the VIE do not have recourse to the general credit of Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.
as a result of including the VIE in the consolidated financial statements. The results of
CW-Bermuda are reflected in the Companys services segment.
10
Table of Contents
6. Impact of recent accounting pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No.
157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy about the
assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a
restriction on the sale or use of an asset. SFAS No. 157 was effective for the Company on January
1, 2008. However, in February 2008, the FASB released FSP FAS 157-2, which delayed the effective
date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for the Companys financial assets and liabilities did not
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. The Company does not believe the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 for its non-financial assets and liabilities, effective January 1, 2009,
will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but
does not affect existing standards which require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value.
The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Under SFAS No.
159, a company may elect to use fair value to measure eligible items at specified election dates
and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in
earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Eligible items include, but are not limited to,
accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, equity method
investments, accounts payable, guarantees, issued debt and firm commitments. If elected, SFAS No.
159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We did not elect to use fair
value to measure our eligible items.
11
Table of Contents
7. Investment in and loan to affiliate
The Companys investment in and loan to its affiliate OC-BVI is comprised of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Equity investment |
$ | 14,073,741 | $ | 14,626,848 | ||||
Loan receivable plant construction |
2,625,000 | 2,875,000 | ||||||
$ | 16,698,741 | $ | 17,501,848 | |||||
OC-BVIs sole customer is the Ministry of Communications and Works of the Government of the British
Virgin Islands (the Ministry) to which it sells bulk water under the terms of the Water Supply
Agreement between the parties dated May 1990 (the 1990 Agreement). Through March 31, 2008, all of
the water sold to the Ministry was produced by OC-BVIs desalination plant located at Baughers Bay,
Tortola (the Baughers Bay plant), which has a capacity of 1.7 million U.S. gallons per day.
Baughers Bay plant dispute:
In October 2006, OC-BVI notified the Company that the Ministry had asserted a purported right of
ownership of the Baughers Bay plant pursuant to the terms of the 1990 Agreement and had invited
OC-BVI to submit a proposal for its continued involvement in the production of water at the
Baughers Bay plant in light of the Ministrys planned assumption of ownership.
Under the terms of the 1990 Agreement, upon the expiration of the initial seven year term in May
1999, the agreement would automatically be extended for another seven year term unless the Ministry
provided notice, at least eight months prior to such expiration, of its decision to purchase the
plant from OC-BVI for approximately $1.42 million.
In correspondence between the parties from late 1998 through early 2000, the Ministry indicated
that the BVI Government was prepared to exercise the option to purchase the plant but would be
amenable to negotiating a new water supply agreement, and that it considered the 1990 Agreement to
be in force on a monthly basis until negotiations between the BVI Government and OC-BVI were
concluded. Occasional discussions were held between the parties since 2000 without resolution of
the matter. OC-BVI has continued to supply water to the Ministry and has expended approximately
$4.7 million to significantly expand the production capacity of the plant beyond that contemplated
in the 1990 Agreement.
OC-BVI submitted a proposal to the Ministry in late 2006 to continue to supply water from the
Baughers Bay plant. The Ministry held discussions with OC-BVI regarding a new contract but did not
formally respond to OC-BVIs proposal. Early in 2007 the Ministry unilaterally took the position
that until such time as a new agreement is reached on the ownership of the plant and the price for
the water produced by the plant, the Ministry would only pay that amount of OC-BVIs billings that
the Ministry purports constitutes OC-BVIs costs of producing the water. At its proposed interim
price, the Ministry would pay only approximately 30% of the amounts billed by OC-BVI pending a new
agreement. OC-BVI responded to the Ministry that the amount the Ministry proposed to pay was
significantly less than OC-BVIs production costs. Payments made by the Ministry to OC-BVI since
the Ministrys assumption of this reduced price have been sporadic and as of December 31, 2007
OC-BVI had received payment for less than 22% of the amounts it billed the Ministry for the year
then ended. On November 15, 2007, OC-BVI issued a demand letter to the BVI Government for
approximately $6.2 million representing amounts that OC-BVI claimed were due by the BVI Government
for water sold and delivered plus interest and legal fees. In response to OC-BVIs demand for
payment, the BVI Government issued a letter dated November 19, 2007 that reasserted its claim that
ownership of the Baughers Bay plant has passed to the BVI Government and rejected OC-BVIs claim
for payment. OC-BVI advised the BVI Government in correspondence dated November 21, 2007 that it
was demanding that the dispute between OC-BVI and the BVI Government be submitted to arbitration
pursuant to the terms of the 1990 Agreement. On the following day, OC-BVIs management was informed
that the BVI Government had filed a lawsuit with the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court seeking
ownership of the Baughers Bay plant. OC-BVI has informed the Company that it intends to vigorously
pursue its rights to full payment for water sold and delivered to the BVI Government and to defend
against any action that the BVI Government owns any interest in the Baughers Bay plant and that it
believes this dispute will be resolved to its satisfaction.
As of December 31, 2007 OC-BVI had $8.1 million in gross accounts receivable balances due from the
BVI Government. In January 2008, the BVI Government remitted a partial payment on these receivables
to OC-BVI of $3.5 million. OC-BVI has billed the BVI government an additional $2.6 million for
water supplied during the three months ended March 31, 2008 but has not received any payments from
the BVI government since the January 2008 payment. If further payments are not received by the end of June 2008, OC-BVI will be required to initiate legal action to protect its rights to these accounts receivables
under the local statute of limitations.
12
Table of Contents
Due to the on-going dispute over the Baughers Bay plant, the continued non-payment by the BVI
government of its accounts receivable balances since January 2008 and the approaching statutory deadline for possible legal action by OC-BVI, effective with the three months
ended March 31, 2008 the Company changed its policy for the recording of its equity in the
financial results of OC-BVI to, in effect, reflect its equity in OC-BVIs results as if revenues
were recognized by this affiliate under the cash, rather than accrual, method. As a result of this
change, the Company recorded a loss from its equity in OC-BVIs results of operations of
approximately $493,000.
The Company accounts for its investment in OC-BVI in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. This accounting
pronouncement requires recognition of a loss on an equity investment that is other than temporary,
and indicates that a current fair value of an equity investment that is less than its carrying
amount may indicate a loss in the value of the investment. To test for possible impairment of its
investment in OC-BVI, the Company estimated its fair value as of December 31, 2007. In making this
estimate, Company management calculated the expected cash flow from its investment in OC-BVI using
the guidance set forth under the FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 7, Using Cash
Flow Information and Present Value in Accounting Measurements. In accordance with this FASB
statement the Company (i) identified various possible outcomes of the Baughers Bay dispute and
negotiations for a contract on the new Bar Bay plant; (ii) estimated the cash flows associated with
each possible outcome, and (iii) assigned a probability to each outcome based upon discussions held
to date by OC-BVIs management with the BVI Government and OC-BVIs legal counsel. The resulting
probability-weighted sum represents the expected cash flows, and the Companys best estimate of
future cash flows, to be derived from its investment in OC-BVI. The Company determined that the
fair value of its investment in OC-BVI, as based upon these expected cash flows, exceeded its
carrying value for its investment in OC-BVI as of December 31, 2007 and therefore no loss should be
recognized on this investment. Based upon the estimate the Company performed as of December 31,
2007 and the developments since that date, the Company has concluded that no impairment loss should
be recognized on its investment in OC-BVI as of March 31, 2008. However, future developments could require the Company to record such an impairment loss at some later date.
The identification of the possible outcomes for the Baughers Bay dispute and Bar Bay negotiations,
the projections of cash flows for each outcome, and the assignment of relative probabilities to
each outcome all represent significant estimates made by the Companys management. The ultimate
resolution of the Baughers Bay and Bar Bay issues may differ significantly from managements
estimates and may result in actual cash flows from OC-BVI that vary materially from the expected
cash flows used by Company management in determining OC-BVIs fair value as of March 31, 2008. If
OC-BVI and the BVI Government are unable to agree on a new contract for Baughers Bay and this
matter proceeds to resolution through the Courts, the Ministrys right of ownership under the 1990
Agreement could be found to be enforceable, in which case OC-BVI could lose its water supply
arrangement with the Ministry or may be forced to accept a water supply arrangement with the
Ministry on less favorable terms, and if the BVI Government exercises its purported right, OC-BVI
could lose ownership of the Baughers Bay plant. Even if OC-BVI is able to refute the Ministrys
purported right of ownership, OC-BVI may elect to accept a new contract on less favorable terms.
OC-BVI may be unsuccessful in negotiating a contract for the Bar Bay plant on terms it finds
acceptable. Any of these or other possible outcomes could result in actual cash flows from the
Companys investment in OC-BVI that are significantly lower than managements estimate as of March 31, 2008. In such
case, the Company could be required to record an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of
its investment in OC-BVI. Such impairment charge would reduce the Companys earnings and could have
a material adverse impact on its results of operations and financial condition.
The Company is not able to presently determine what impact the resolution of this matter may have
on its results of operations or financial condition.
Bar Bay plant:
During 2007, OC-BVI completed, for a total cost of approximately $8.0 million, the construction of
a 700,000 U.S. gallons per day desalination plant located at Bar Bay, Tortola (the Bar Bay
plant). The Company provided OC-BVI with a $3 million loan to fund part of this plants
construction costs, of which $2,625,000 remained outstanding as of March 31, 2008. Principal on
this loan is payable in quarterly installments of $125,000 with a final balloon payment of $2
million due on August 31, 2009 and interest on the loan is due quarterly at the rate of LIBOR plus
3.5%. OC-BVI constructed this plant in response to what it believes is an extreme shortage of, and
a pressing demand for, potable water on the eastern end of Tortola and anticipated entering into a
bulk water supply agreement with the Ministry. However, due to the Baughers Bay dispute, OC-BVI
has not reached an agreement with the Ministry and the Bar Bay plant has not yet commenced
operations.
13
Table of Contents
8. Litigation
On November 17, 2006, Gruppozecca Bahamas Limited (GBL) filed a Statement of Claim in the Supreme
Court of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas against Consolidated Water (Bahamas) Limited
(CW-Bahamas) seeking damages in excess of $950,000 for CW-Bahamas alleged breach of its
obligations under an agreement between GBL and CW-Bahamas relating to the
construction of a desalination plant in the Commonwealth of The Bahamas. CW-Bahamas has responded
to the Statement of Claim, asserting its belief that the claims made by GBL against CW-Bahamas are
without merit, and is vigorously defending against such claims.
From time to time the Company is involved in legal proceedings or claims arising in the normal
course of business. Other than as already disclosed, the Company was not aware of any legal
proceedings or claims, either threatened or pending, that Company management believes would result
in a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including but not limited
to, statements regarding our future revenues, future plans, objectives, expectations and events,
assumptions and estimates. Forward-looking statements can be identified by use of the words or
phrases will, will likely result, are expected to, will continue, estimate, project,
potential, believe, plan, anticipate, expect, intend, or similar expressions and
variations of such words. Statements that are not historical facts are based on our current
expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates, forecasts and projections for our business and the
industry and markets related to our business.
The forward-looking statements contained in this report are not guarantees of future performance
and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict. Actual
outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed in such forward-looking
statements. Important factors which may affect these actual outcomes and results include, without
limitation, tourism and weather conditions in the areas we service, scheduled new construction
within our operating areas, the economies of the U.S. and the areas we service, regulatory matters,
availability of capital to repay debt and for expansion of our operations, and other factors,
including those set forth under Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report.
The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report speak as of its date. We expressly disclaim
any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this
Quarterly Report to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in
events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based, except as may
be required by law.
Unless otherwise indicated, references to we, our, ours and us refer to Consolidated Water
Co. Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
Critical Accounting Policies
We believe the following accounting policies are critical to the understanding of our financial
condition and results of operations.
Use of estimates: The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to trade accounts receivable, goodwill and other
intangible assets and property, plant and equipment. We base our estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that may not be readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
materially from these estimates.
14
Table of Contents
Trade accounts receivable: We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of our customers to make payments. Management continuously evaluates
the collectibility of accounts receivable and records allowances based on estimates of the level of
actual write-offs that might be experienced. These estimates are based on, among other things,
comparisons of the relative age of accounts and consideration of actual write-off history.
Property, plant and equipment: Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation commences in the month the asset is placed in service and is calculated
using a straight-line method with an allowance for estimated residual value. Rates are determined
based on the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Buildings
|
5 to 40 years | |
Plant and equipment
|
4 to 40 years | |
Distribution system
|
3 to 40 years | |
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
3 to 10 years | |
Vehicles
|
3 to 10 years | |
Leasehold improvements
|
Shorter of 5 years or operating lease term outstanding | |
Lab equipment
|
5 to 10 years |
Additions to property, plant and equipment are comprised of the cost of the contracted services,
direct labor and materials. Assets under construction are recorded as additions to property, plant
and equipment upon completion of a project. Improvements that significantly increase the value of
property, plant and equipment are capitalized.
Construction in progress: The cost of borrowed funds directly attributable to the acquisition and
construction of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of
time to be ready for their intended use, are added to the cost of those assets until such time as
the assets are substantially ready for use or sale.
Goodwill and other intangible assets: Goodwill represents the excess costs over fair value of the
assets of an acquired business. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination
accounted for as a purchase and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but
are tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with
useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives, to their estimated residual
values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We periodically evaluate the possible impairment of goodwill.
Management identifies its reporting units and determines the carrying value of each reporting unit
by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to
those reporting units. We determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the
carrying amount of the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount of the reporting unit
exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit we are required to perform the second step of the
impairment test, as this is an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be impaired. In this
step, we compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of
the reporting unit goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the
fair value of the reporting unit to all the assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities of
the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with SFAS No.
141, Business Combinations. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair
value of the reporting unit goodwill. If the implied fair value is less than its carrying amount,
the impairment loss is recorded. Our annual tests resulted in no goodwill impairment.
Revenue and cost of sales: Customers are billed monthly based on meter readings performed at or
near each month end and in accordance with contractual agreements which stipulate minimum monthly
charges for water service. An accrual, where necessary, is made for water delivered but unbilled at
year end when readings are not performed at the year end date. The accrual is matched with the
direct costs of producing, purchasing and delivering water.
Consulting revenue is recognized on the accrual basis based upon time spent at agreed upon rates
and is included under services revenue.
Interest income is recognized over the term of a loan based on the interest rate stated in the loan agreement and is included in interest income.
Plant construction revenues and costs of plant construction: We use the percentage of completion
method to recognize revenue and related costs as work progresses on fixed price contracts for the
construction of desalination plants to be sold to third parties. The percentage-of-completion
method relies on contract revenue and estimates of total expected costs. We follow this method
since we can make reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs applicable to various
stages of a contract. Under the percentage-
15
Table of Contents
of-completion method, we record revenue and recognize profit or loss as work on the contract
progresses. We estimate total project costs and profit to be earned on each long term, fixed price
contract prior to commencement of work on the contract and update these estimates as work on the
contract progresses. The cumulative amount of revenue recorded on a contract at a specified point
in time is that percentage of total estimated revenue that incurred costs to date comprises of
estimated total contract costs. If, as work progresses, the actual contract costs exceed estimates,
the profit recognized on revenue from that contract decreases. We recognize the full amount of any
estimated loss on a contract at the time our estimates indicate such a loss. Billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are classified as current liabilities. Any
costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings are classified as current assets.
Consolidation: For consolidation purposes we evaluate our investments in subsidiaries and
affiliates in accordance with the guidance set forth in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51
Consolidated Financial Statements and related pronouncements, including Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46(R)).
This interpretation addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest
entities, which have one or more of the characteristics defined in the interpretation. We
consolidate the results of those affiliates that possess the characteristics of a variable rate
entity and for which we are the primary financial beneficiary.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
included under Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and our consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007
(2007 Form 10-K) and the information set forth under Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our 2007 Form 10-K.
(2007 Form 10-K) and the information set forth under Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our 2007 Form 10-K.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
Consolidated Results
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $1,673,867 ($0.12 per share on a
fully-diluted basis) as compared to $3,587,478 ($0.25 per share on a fully-diluted basis) for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. The drop in our net income from 2007 to 2008 reflects in part a decline in the income from operations generated by each of our operating segments in 2008 as
compared to 2007. Our 2008 results were also adversely affected by the loss we recorded from our
equity investment in OC-BVI for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $12,735,729, a slight increase from
the $12,734,610 in revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007. An increase in bulk water
revenues more than offset a decline in revenues from the other two operating segments. Gross
profit for the 2008 quarter was $4,536,058, or 36% of total revenues, as compared to $5,303,355, or
42%, for the 2007 quarter. For further discussion of revenues and gross profit for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, see the Results by Segment analysis that follows.
General and administrative (G&A) expenses were $2,466,592 and $2,339,181 on a consolidated basis
for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. This increase is attributable to minor
increases in several of the various categories comprising G&A expenses.
Due to OC-BVIs inability to resolve its on-going contractual dispute with the British Virgin
Islands government relating to its Baughers Bay plant, we changed our policy for recognizing the
results of this affiliate effective with the three months ended March 31, 2008. Consequently, we
reported a loss from our investment in OC-BVI for the three months ended March 31, 2008 of
approximately $493,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 our equity in the earnings of
OC-BVI was $459,123 and we earned $166,774 on our profit sharing agreement for OC-BVI. See further
discussion of the OC-BVI situation at Liquidity and Capital Resources Material Commitments,
Contingencies and Expenditures OC-BVI Contract Dispute.
16
Table of Contents
Results by Segment
Retail Segment:
Our retail segment contributed $1,226,488 to our income from operations in 2008, as compared to
$1,381,301 in 2007.
Revenues generated by our retail water operations were $5,010,511 and $5,104,210 for 2008 and 2007,
respectively. By volume of gallons sold, our retail revenues decreased by approximately 5.4% in
2008 when compared to 2007. Statistics maintained by local sources indicate that the rainfall on
Grand Cayman Island during the three months ended March 31, 2008 significantly exceeded that for
the three months ended March 31, 2007. We believe this relative increase in rainfall on Grand
Cayman for 2008 contributed to the decline in our retail revenues from 2007 to 2008. Additionally,
in 2008 the Ritz Carlton Hotel used non-potable water they produced (rather than buying water from
us, as they did in 2007) to irrigate their golf course and the Cayman Turtle Farm located at
Boatswains Beach in West Bay significantly reduced its water usage from 2007 levels.
Retail segment gross profit was $3,266,341 (65% of revenues) and $3,340,894 (65% of revenues) in
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Consistent with prior periods, we record all non-direct G&A expenses in our retail business segment
and do not allocate any of these non-direct costs to our other two business segments. Retail G&A
expenses for 2008 were $2,039,853, up $80,260 from the $1,959,593 in G&A expenses for 2007. The 4%
increase in G&A expenses for 2008 is attributable to minor increases in each of the major
categories (employee costs, professional fees, insurance and directors fees and expenses)
comprising G&A expenses.
Bulk Segment:
Our bulk segment contributed $651,853 and $996,792 to our income from operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Bulk segment revenues were $6,167,324 and $5,227,521 for 2008 and 2007, respectively. Revenues
from the bulk segment grew from 2007 to 2008 primarily due to increased revenues for our operations
in the Bahamas and Grand Cayman of approximately $657,000 and $270,000, respectively.
Gross profit for our bulk segment was $1,028,039 and $1,338,559 for 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of bulk revenues declined from 26% in 2007 to 17% in
2008 primarily due to additional diesel and maintenance costs for our Bahamas operations. Our
contract with the Water and Sewerage Corporation (WSC) for our Windsor plant provides for the
pass through of increases in diesel costs to the WSC if the plant is operating at or better than
the efficiency specified in the contract. In early 2006, we reconfigured the Windsor plant in
order to mitigate membrane fouling. However, this reconfiguration resulted in a decrease in the
fuel efficiency of the Windsor plant and we have not been able to pass through all of our diesel costs to the WSC. This inefficiency was exacerbated by a 58% rise in diesel fuel prices over the past twelve months. Consequently,
approximately $207,000 was incurred in diesel costs during the first three months of 2008 that
could not be billed to the WSC. We are currently constructing new feed water wells and will
replace the reverse osmosis membranes on two of four of our production trains. While we anticipate
that these improvements will allow us to reverse the plant reconfiguration and improve the Windsor
plants fuel efficiency by the end of the third quarter of 2008, our gross profit for our Bahamas
operations in the interim will continue to be adversely affected by its diesel costs. The repairs
and maintenance costs for our Bahamas operations for the 2008 quarter exceeded those for the 2007
quarter by approximately $271,000.
Bulk segment G&A expenses for 2008 and 2007 remained relatively consistent at $376,186 and
$341,767, respectively.
Included in our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2008 are approximately $5.6 million in
accounts receivable due to our Bahamas subsidiary from the WSC. This receivable balance exceeds
the amounts billed to the WSC during the three months ended March 31, 2008 by approximately $1.3
million. During April 2008, we met with representatives of the Bahamas government to inquire as to
the reasons for the increase in the receivable balance. We were informed in this meeting by the
government representatives that the delay in paying our accounts receivables was due to operating
issues within the WSC, that the delay did not reflect any type of dispute with us with respect to
the amounts owed, and that the amounts would ultimately be paid in full. Based upon this meeting,
we believe that the accounts receivable from the WSC are fully collectible and therefore have not
provided any allowance for possible non-payment of these receivables as of March 31, 2008.
17
Table of Contents
Services Segment:
Our services segment contributed $191,125 and $586,081 to our income from operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Revenues from services provided in 2008 were $1,557,894 as compared to $2,402,879 in 2007. Services
revenues decreased from 2007 to 2008 due to lower relative construction expenditures in 2008.
Gross profit dollars declined from 2007 to 2008 consistent with the decline in revenues.
G&A expenses for the services segment were $50,553 and $37,821 for 2008 and 2007, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Our sources of cash are operations, borrowings under term loans and credit facilities and sales of
debt and equity securities.
Our cash flows from operations are derived from distributions and management fees paid to us by our
operating subsidiaries. Cash flows from our subsidiaries operations are dependent upon the revenue
amounts generated, which are affected primarily by tourism, weather conditions, changes in our
customer base, the timing and level of rate increases, overall economic conditions and other
factors and the timing of the collection of these revenues from our customers. Distributions from
CW-Bahamas to us are subject to certain restrictions under the terms of its credit facility.
Our ability to access the debt and equity capital markets is impacted by our current and
anticipated financial results, financial condition; existing level of borrowings; the terms of our
debt agreements (including our compliance therewith), and conditions in the debt and equity
markets.
Our primary uses of cash are construction costs and capital expenditures, including plant expansion
and new plant construction. Other significant uses include payment of dividends, repayment of debt
and pursuit of new business opportunities.
Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Our cash and cash equivalents increased from $38,529,383 as of December 31, 2007 to $39,753,270 as
of March 31, 2008.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Operating activities provided net cash for the three months ended March 31, 2008 of $3,118,722.
This cash provided reflects net income generated for the three months ended of approximately $1.7
million, as adjusted for various items which impact net income but do not impact cash during the
period, such as depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, and other items.
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
Our investing activities used $713,054 in net cash during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Of
the approximately $1.2 million in capital expenditures for the period, approximately $240,000 was
used to fund an expansion of the well-field for our Windsor plant in the Bahamas and approximately
$120,000 was spent on the expansion of the Governors Harbor plant. We collected $489,341 on our
loans receivable.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
We used $1,181,781 in net cash from our financing activities during the three months ended March
31, 2008. We made $313,729 in scheduled payments on our bonds payable and paid dividends of
$868,052 during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Financial Position
Our total assets decreased from approximately $149.3 million as of December 31, 2007 to $148.5
million as of March 31, 2008.
18
Table of Contents
Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased by approximately $412,000 due to the
amortization of prepaid expenses.
Borrowings Outstanding
As of March 31, 2008 we had borrowings outstanding aggregating $23,222,827 that consisted of bonds
payable.
5.95% Secured Bonds
In August 2006, we issued $15,771,997 principal amount secured fixed rate bonds in a private
offering and received net proceeds (excluding issuance costs and after the offering discount) of
$14,445,720. These bonds bear interest at a rate of 5.95%, are repayable in quarterly principal and
interest installments of $526,010 and mature in 2016. We have the right to redeem the bonds in full
at any time after August 4, 2009 at a premium of 1.5% of the outstanding principal and accrued
interest on the bonds on the date of redemption. As of March 31, 2008, $13,361,809 in principal
amount was outstanding on these secured bonds. Our obligations under the bonds are secured by fixed
and floating charges (i) on all of our assets, including an equitable charge of all of the shares
of Cayman Water, and (ii) on all of Cayman Waters assets including its real estate. Cayman Water
has also guaranteed our payment obligations under the bonds.
The trust deed for these bonds restricts our ability to enter into new borrowing agreements or any
new guarantees without prior approval of the trustee and limits our capital expenditures, with the
exception of capital expenditures to be incurred on certain defined projects, to $2,000,000
annually without prior approval by the trustee. The trust deed also contains financial covenants
that require us to maintain a debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1, a ratio of
long term debt to EBITDA (i.e. earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
for the 12 months preceding the ratio calculation date) not greater than 2.5 to 1 and a ratio of
long term debt to equity equal to or less than 1.5 to 1. As of March 31, 2008, we were in
compliance with the covenants under the trust.
CW-Bahamas Series A Bonds
In July 2005, CW-Bahamas sold BAH$10,000,000 Series A bonds to Bahamian citizens and permanent
resident investors in The Bahamas to finance a portion of the construction cost of its Blue Hills
plant. These bonds mature on June 30, 2015 and accrue interest at the annual fixed rate of 7.5%.
Interest is payable quarterly. CW-Bahamas has the option to redeem the bonds in whole or in part
without penalty commencing after June 30, 2008. We have guaranteed CW-Bahamas repayment obligations
upon an event of default as defined in the guarantee agreement. If we pay any amounts pursuant to
the guarantee, we will be subrogated to all rights of the bondholders in respect of any such
payments. The guarantee is a general unsecured obligation junior to our other secured obligations.
As of March 31, 2008, BAH$10,000,000 of the Series A bonds was outstanding.
CW-Bahamas Credit Facility
CW-Bahamas has a credit facility with Royal Bank of Canada that consists of a BAH$500,000 revolving
working capital loan. The obligations under the credit facility are secured by the assets of
CW-Bahamas. Borrowings under the working capital loan accrue interest at the Nassau Prime rate plus
1.50% per annum. As of March 31, 2008, no amounts were outstanding under this facility.
The credit facility contains certain covenants applicable to CW-Bahamas, including restrictions on
additional debt, guarantees and sale of assets. The credit facility limits the payment of dividends
by CW-Bahamas to available cash flow (as defined in the governing loan agreement). The credit
facility also contains a financial covenant requiring CW-Bahamas to maintain a ratio of total
liabilities to tangible net worth (each as defined in the loan agreement) of not greater than 2 to
1.
All obligations under the credit facility are repayable on demand. CW-Bahamas was not in compliance
with the financial covenant of this facility as of March 31, 2008, however, we do not believe this non-compliance will have a material impact on CW-Bahamas.
Material Commitments, Expenditures and Contingencies
OC-BVI Contract Dispute
In October 2006, our affiliate OC-BVI notified us that the Ministry of Communications and Works of
the Government of the British Virgin Islands (the Ministry) had asserted a purported right of
ownership of the Baughers Bay plant pursuant to the terms of the Water Supply Agreement between the
parties dated May 1990 (the 1990 Agreement) and had invited OC-BVI to submit a proposal
for its continued involvement in the production of water at the Baughers Bay plant in light of the
Ministrys planned assumption of ownership.
19
Table of Contents
Under the terms of the 1990 Agreement, upon the expiration of the initial seven year term in May
1999, the agreement would automatically be extended for another seven year term unless the Ministry
provided notice, at least eight months prior to such expiration, of its decision to purchase the
plant from OC-BVI for approximately $1.42 million.
In correspondence between the parties from late 1998 through early 2000, the Ministry indicated
that the BVI Government was prepared to exercise the option to purchase the plant but would be
amenable to negotiating a new water supply agreement, and that it considered the 1990 Agreement to
be in force on a monthly basis until negotiations between the BVI Government and OC-BVI were
concluded. Occasional discussions were held between the parties since 2000 without resolution of
the matter. OC-BVI has continued to supply water to the Ministry and has expended approximately
$4.7 million to significantly expand the production capacity of the plant beyond that contemplated
in the 1990 Agreement.
The Ministry is OC-BVIs sole customer and substantially all of its revenues are generated from the
Baughers Bay plant. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recognized approximately
$1.6 million, and $1.4 million, respectively, in income from our equity investment in the earnings
of OC-BVI. For those same years, we recognized approximately $669,000 and $1,500,000, respectively,
in revenues from our management services agreement with OC-BVI. We also recognized approximately
$652,000 and $508,000 in other income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
from our profit-sharing agreement with OC-BVI. In addition to our loan to, and equity investment
in, OC-BVI of approximately $16.7 million, the recorded value of our management services agreement
with OC-BVI, which is reflected as an intangible asset on our consolidated balance sheet, was
approximately $856,000 as of March 31, 2008.
OC-BVI submitted a proposal to the Ministry in late 2006 to continue to supply water from the
Baughers Bay plant. The Ministry held discussions with OC-BVI regarding a new contract but did not
formally respond to OC-BVIs proposal. Early in 2007 the Ministry unilaterally took the position
that until such time as a new agreement is reached on the ownership of the plant and the price for
the water produced by the plant, the Ministry would only pay that amount of OC-BVIs billings that
the Ministry purports constitutes OC-BVIs costs of producing the water. At its proposed interim
price, the Ministry would pay only approximately 30% of the amounts billed by OC-BVI pending a new
agreement. OC-BVI responded to the Ministry that the amount the Ministry proposed to pay was
significantly less than OC-BVIs production costs. Payments made by the Ministry to OC-BVI since
the Ministrys assumption of this reduced price have been sporadic and as of December 31, 2007
OC-BVI had received payment for less than 22% of the amounts it billed the Ministry for the year
then ended. On November 15, 2007, OC-BVI issued a demand letter to the BVI Government for
approximately $6.2 million representing amounts that OC-BVI claimed were due by the BVI Government
for water sold and delivered plus interest and legal fees. In response to OC-BVIs demand for
payment, the BVI Government issued a letter dated November 19, 2007 that reasserted its claim that
ownership of the Baughers Bay plant has passed to the BVI Government and rejected OC-BVIs claim
for payment. OC-BVI advised the BVI Government in correspondence dated November 21, 2007 that it
was demanding that the dispute between OC-BVI and the BVI Government be submitted to arbitration
pursuant to the terms of the 1990 Agreement. On the following day, OC-BVIs management was informed
that the BVI Government had filed a lawsuit with the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court seeking
ownership of the Baughers Bay plant. OC-BVI has informed the Company that it intends to vigorously
pursue its rights to full payment for water sold and delivered to the BVI Government and to defend
against any action that the BVI Government owns any interest in the Baughers Bay plant and that it
believes this dispute will be resolved to its satisfaction.
As of December 31, 2007 OC-BVI had $8.1 million in gross accounts receivable balances due from the
BVI Government. In January 2008 the BVI Government remitted a partial payment on these receivables
to OC-BVI of $3.5 million. OC-BVI has billed the BVI government an additional $2.6 million for
water supplied during the three months ended March 31, 2008 but has not received any payments from
the BVI government since the January 2008 payment.
During 2007 OC-BVI completed, for a total cost of approximately $8 million, the construction of a
700,000 U.S. gallons per day desalination plant located at Bar Bay, Tortola (the Bar Bay plant).
We provided OC-BVI with a $3 million loan to fund part of this plants construction costs, of which
$2,625,000 remained outstanding as of March 31, 2008. Principal on this loan is payable in
quarterly installments of $125,000 with a final balloon payment of $2 million due on August 31,
2009 and interest on the loan is due quarterly at the rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%. OC-BVI constructed
this plant in response to what it believes is an extreme shortage of, and a pressing demand for,
potable water on the eastern end of Tortola and anticipated entering into a bulk water supply
agreement with the Ministry. However, due to the Baughers Bay dispute OC-BVI had not reached an
agreement with the Ministry and the Bar Bay plant has not yet commenced operations.
20
Table of Contents
OC-BVI informed us that it met with members of the Ministry and others in the BVI Government in
March 2008 and that during this meeting the BVI Government expressed its preference to resolve the
Baughers Bay ownership issue without litigation and to enter into negotiations for new water supply
agreements with OC-BVI on mutually acceptable terms for both the Baughers Bay and Bar Bay plants.
The management of OC-BVI also informed us that they believed based upon this meeting that further
payments against its outstanding accounts receivables from the BVI Government would be forthcoming
in the near future.
However, since the March 2008 meeting with the BVI government, the Baughers Bay dispute has not
been resolved, a contract for the Bar Bay plant has not been negotiated and the BVI government has
not made any further payments on its outstanding accounts receivable balances. If further payments are not received by the end of June 2008, OC-BVI will be required to initiate legal action to protect its rights to these accounts
receivables under the local statute of limitations.
The U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission, in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 Revenue
Recognition (SAB No. 104), has provided its guidance on revenue recognition. As stated in SAB
No. 104, the SEC believes that revenue is generally realized or realizable and earned when all of
the following criteria are met:
| Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. | ||
| Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. | ||
| The sellers price to the buyer is fixed and determinable; and | ||
| Collectibility is reasonably assured. |
OC-BVIs Board of Directors continues to believe that OC-BVI is contractually entitled to full
payment of all amounts billed to date for water supplied to the BVI government and that OC-BVI will
ultimately collect all amounts billed. However, no progress has been made with respect to
resolving the Baughers Bay ownership issue nor have any payments been received from the BVI
government since the March 2008 meeting. Accordingly, we have reevaluated whether our equity in
the earnings or losses of OC-BVI should presently be based upon OC-BVIs use of the full accrual
method to recognize all amounts billed to the BVI government. The lack of progress with respect to
the resolution of the dispute, the failure by the BVI government to make any payments since
the March 2008 meeting and the increased possibility that legal action may ultimately be necessary to collect the accounts receivable balances given the approaching June 2008 statutory deadline, indicate that OC-BVI cannot clearly meet all of the revenue recognition
criteria set forth in SAB No. 104. Accordingly, effective with the three months ended March 31,
2008, we changed our policy for the recording of our equity in the financial results of OC-BVI to,
in effect, reflect our equity in OCBVIs results as if revenues were recognized by this affiliate
under the cash, rather than accrual, method. We have considered all amounts billed by OC-BVI to
the BVI government during the three months ended March 31, 2008, which totaled approximately $2.6
million to be deferred revenues. As a result of this adjustment to OC-BVIs revenues, we have
recorded a loss from our equity in OC-BVIs results of operations of approximately $493,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2008. For the purpose of recording our equity pickup in OC-BVIs
future results, we will consider any future payments made by the BVI government to be applicable
first to the outstanding accounts receivable balance of approximately $4.6 million remaining as of
March 31, 2008 that arose from billings as of December 31, 2007.
We account for our investment in OC-BVI in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. This accounting
pronouncement requires recognition of a loss on an equity investment that is other than temporary,
and indicates that a current fair value of an equity investment that is less than its carrying
amount may indicate a loss in the value of the investment. To test for possible impairment of our
investment in OC-BVI, we estimated its fair value as of December 31, 2007. In making this estimate,
we calculated the expected cash flows from our investment in OC-BVI using the guidance set forth
under the FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 7, Using Cash Flow Information and
Present Value in Accounting Measurements. In accordance with this FASB statement we (i) identified
various possible outcomes of the Baughers Bay dispute and negotiations for a contract on the new
Bar Bay plant; (ii) estimated the cash flows associated with each possible outcome, and (iii)
assigned a probability to each outcome based upon discussions held to date by OC-BVIs management
with the BVI Government and OC-BVIs legal counsel. The resulting probability-weighted sum
represents the expected cash flows, and our best estimate of future cash flows, to be derived from
our investment in OC-BVI. We determined that the fair value of our investment in OC-BVI, as based
upon these expected cash flows, exceeded our carrying value for its investment in OC-BVI as of
December 31, 2007 and therefore no loss should be recognized on this investment. Based upon the
estimate we performed as of December 31, 2007 and the developments since that date, we have
concluded that no loss should be recognized on our investment in OC-BVI as of March 31, 2008. However, future developments could require us to record such an impairment loss
at some later date.
The identification of the possible outcomes for the Baughers Bay dispute and Bar Bay negotiations,
the projections of cash flows for each outcome, and the assignment of relative probabilities to
each outcome all represent significant estimates made by us. The ultimate resolution of the
Baughers Bay and Bar Bay issues may differ significantly from our estimates and may result in
actual cash flows from OC-BVI that vary materially from the expected cash flows we used in
determining OC-BVIs fair value as of March 31, 2008. If OC-BVI and the BVI Government are unable
to agree on a new contract for Baughers Bay and this matter proceeds to
21
Table of Contents
resolution through the Courts, the Ministrys right of ownership under the 1990 Agreement could be
found to be enforceable, in which case OC-BVI could lose its water supply arrangement with the
Ministry or may be forced to accept a water supply arrangement with the Ministry on less favorable
terms, and if the BVI Government exercises its purported right, OC-BVI could lose ownership of the
Baughers Bay plant. Even if OC-BVI is able to refute the Ministrys purported right of ownership,
OC-BVI may elect to accept a new contract on less favorable terms. OC-BVI may be unsuccessful in
negotiating a contract for the Bar Bay plant on terms it finds acceptable. Any of these or other
possible outcomes could result in actual cash flows from our investment in OC-BVI that are
significantly lower than our estimate as of March 31, 2008. In such case, we could be required to record an impairment
charge to reduce the carrying value of our investment in OC-BVI. Such impairment charge would
reduce our earnings and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and
financial condition.
CW-Bahamas Performance Bonds
We have two contracts, one for our Windsor plant and one for our Blue Hills plant, to supply water
to the Water and Sewerage Corporation of the Government of The Bahamas (WSC). Each contract requires
us to guarantee delivery of a minimum quantity of water per week. If we do not meet this minimum,
we are required to pay to the WSC for the difference between the minimum and actual gallons
delivered at a per gallon rate equal to the price per gallon that WSC is currently paying us under
the contract. The Windsor and Blue Hills contracts expire in 2013 and 2026, respectively and
require us to deliver 14.0 million imperial gallons and 28.0 million imperial gallons,
respectively, of water each week. We are required to provide the WSC with performance and operating
guarantees, in the form of bank-issued letters of credit, to secure any payments we may be required
to make under the minimum delivery requirements of these contracts. As of May 5, 2008, a
performance bond of $1.9 million was outstanding for the Windsor plant. We expect to obtain a
performance bond for the Blue Hills plant later this fiscal year.
CW-Bermuda Financing
In January 2007, our recently formed affiliate, CW-Bermuda, signed a contract with the Government
of Bermuda to design, build and operate a desalination plant at Tynes Bay on the northern coast of
Bermuda. The project includes the desalination plant which will have a production capacity of
600,000 U.S. gallons per day, a standby electrical power plant and 1.27 miles of main water
delivery pipelines. The plant design provides for a future increase in production capacity to 1.2
million U.S. gallons per day. CW-Bermuda is constructing the plant and will operate it. Under the
terms of the contract, CW-Bermuda is required to complete construction and commission the plant and
pipeline by the end of June 2008 and will operate the plant for at least 12 months after
commissioning. We have agreed to loan CW-Bermuda up to $7.5 million to complete construction of the
project and have entered into a management agreement with CW-Bermuda to oversee construction of the
plant and to operate the plant once it is completed. The total revenues to be received under this
contract for the desalination plant and management agreement are estimated to be approximately
$10.8 million. As of March 31, 2008, approximately $451,000 was receivable from our Bermuda
affiliate and our remaining loan commitment under this facility was approximately $7.0 million.
In March 2008, we reached an agreement with the Government of Bermuda to expand the capacity of the
plant from 600,000 U.S. gallons per day to 1.2 million U.S. gallons per day. We do not expect to
provide any additional funding to CW-Bermuda under our credit facility because of this plant
expansion.
22
Table of Contents
Frank Sound Contract
In July 2007, the Cayman Islands Government awarded Ocean Conversion (Cayman) Limited, a ten-year
Design-Build-Sell-Operate contract for a seawater desalination plant on Frank Sound on Grand Cayman
Island. The design capacity of the new plant will be 2.38 million U.S. gallons per day with a
contract guarantee for the delivery of 2.14 million U.S. gallons per day to the customer, the Water
Authority-Cayman. It is anticipated that this project will be completed in late 2008 or early 2009.
Dividends
On January 31, 2008, we paid a dividend $0.065 to shareholders of record on January 15, 2008.
On February 20, 2008 our Board declared a dividend of $0.065 payable on April 30, 2008 to
shareholders of record on March 31, 2008.
We have paid dividends to owners of our ordinary shares and redeemable preference shares since we
began declaring dividends in 1985. Our
payment of any future cash dividends will depend upon our earnings, financial condition, cash
flows, capital requirements and other factors our Board deems relevant in determining the
amount and timing of such dividends.
Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock Purchase Plan
This program is available to our shareholders, who may reinvest all or a portion of their common
cash dividends into shares of common stock at prevailing market prices. It also accepts optional
cash payments to purchase additional shares at prevailing market prices.
23
Table of Contents
Impact of Inflation
Under the terms of our Cayman Islands license and our water sales agreements in Belize, Bahamas and
the British Virgin Islands, our water rates are automatically adjusted for inflation on an annual
basis, subject to temporary exceptions. We, therefore, believe that the impact of inflation on our
net income, measured in consistent dollars, will not be material.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Credit Risk
We are not exposed to significant credit risk on retail customer accounts in the Cayman Islands,
Bimini and The Bahamas, as our policy is to cease supply of water to customers whose accounts are
more than 45 days overdue. Our primary exposure to credit risk is from accounts receivable arising
from bulk water sales to the governments of Belize, The Bahamas, The British Virgin Islands, and
the Cayman Islands. As of March 31, 2008 we had approximately $3.0 million in loans receivable due
from the Water Authority-Cayman and $2,625,000 in a loan receivable due from our affiliate OC-BVI.
Interest Rate Risk
We are not exposed to significant interest rate risk as the annual interest rates on our Series A
bonds and 5.95% bonds are fixed at 7.5% and 5.95%, respectively. As of March 31, 2008, we are
subject to interest rate risk related to our $2,625,000 loan to OC-BVI that bears interest at the
three month LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum.
Foreign Exchange Risk
All of our foreign currencies have fixed exchanged rates to the U.S. dollar. If any of these fixed
exchange rates become a floating exchange rate, however, our results of operation could be
adversely affected.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of its principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, the companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation of such internal control that occurred during the Companys last
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
24
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business faces significant risks. These risks include those disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as supplemented by the additional
risk factors included below. If any of the events or circumstances described in the referenced
risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially adversely affected and such events or circumstances could cause our actual results to
differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this
report. These risks should be read in conjunction with the other information set forth in this
Quarterly Report as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
and in our other periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K.
The water supply agreement between the British Virgin Islands Water and Sewerage Department and our
affiliate, OC-BVI, is on a month-to-month basis and could be cancelled or renegotiated on less
favorable terms.
Since the expiration of the initial term of their bulk water supply agreement in May 1999, OC-BVI
has supplied water to the British Virgin Islands Water and Sewerage Department under what it
considers to be a month-to-month supply arrangement. Under this arrangement, the British Virgin
Islands government could cease purchasing water from OC-BVI at any time. OC-BVI has continued to
make attempts to negotiate a new water supply agreement. However, this agreement may not be renewed
and a new agreement may not be reached. If a new agreement is obtained, it may be on terms less
favorable to OC-BVI than the current arrangement. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
we recognized approximately $1.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively, in income from our equity
investment in the earnings of OC-BVI. For these same years, we recognized approximately $669,000
and $1,500,000, respectively, in revenues from our agreement to provide management services to
OC-BVI. We also recognized approximately $652,000 and $508,000 in other income for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, from a profit-sharing agreement we have with OC-BVI.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we recognized a loss from our equity investment in
the earnings of OC-BVI of approximately $493,000 and revenues of approximately $70,000 from our
agreement to provide management services to OC-BVI. As of March 31, 2008, our loans to, and equity
investment in, OC-BVI equaled approximately $16.7 million and the recorded value of our management
services agreement, which is reflected on our balance sheet as an intangible asset, was
approximately $856,000. In the event that the British Virgin Islands government ceased purchasing
water from OC-BVI, or entered into a new contract with OC-BVI on less favorable terms than the
existing supply arrangement, the values of our investment in OC-BVI, loan to OC-BVI and OC-BVI
intangible asset would decline, and we could be required to record impairment charges to reduce the
carrying values of these assets. Such impairment charges would reduce our earnings and could have a
significant adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
The British Virgin Islands government has asserted a purported right of ownership of OC-BVIs
Baughers Bay plant. If this right is found to be enforceable and is exercised by the government,
OC-BVI will lose ownership of the Baughers Bay plant.
In October 2006, the British Virgin Islands government notified OC-BVI that it was asserting a
purported right of ownership of OC-BVIs desalination plant in Baughers Bay, Tortola pursuant to
the terms of a water supply agreement dated May 1990 (or the 1990 Agreement) and invited OC-BVI
to submit a proposal for its continued involvement in the production of water at the Baughers Bay
plant. While OC-BVI believes that the governments claim can be resolved to the satisfaction of
both parties through the negotiation of a new agreement, we cannot assure you that the government
shares this belief or that such a result will occur. On November 15, 2007, OC-BVI issued a demand
letter to the BVI Government for approximately $6.2 million representing amounts that OC-BVI
claimed were due by the BVI Government for water sold and delivered plus interest and legal fees.
In response to OC-BVIs demand for payment, the BVI Government issued a letter dated November 19,
2007 that reasserted its claim that ownership of the Baughers Bay plant has passed to the BVI
Government and rejected OC-BVIs claim for payment. OC-BVI advised the BVI Government in
correspondence dated November 21, 2007 that it was demanding that the dispute between OC-BVI and
the BVI Government be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the terms of the 1990 Agreement. On the
following day, OC-BVIs management was informed that the BVI Government had filed a lawsuit with
the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court seeking ownership of the Baughers Bay plant. For the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 we recognized approximately $1.6 million and $1.4 million,
respectively in income from our equity investment in the earnings of OC-BVI and approximately
$669,000 and $1.5 million in revenue, respectively, from our agreement to provide management
services to OC-BVI. We also recognized approximately $652,000 and $508,000 in other income for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, from a profit-sharing agreement we have with
OC-BVI. As of March 31, 2008, our loans to, and equity investment in, OC-BVI totaled approximately
$16.7 million and the recorded value of our management services agreement, which is reflected on
our balance sheet as an intangible asset, was approximately $856,000. If the governments right of
ownership under the 1990 Agreement is found to be enforceable, OC-BVI may be forced to accept a
water supply arrangement with the government on less favorable terms, and if the government
exercises its purported right, OC-BVI could lose ownership of the Baughers Bay plant. In either
case, the value of our OC-BVI-related assets would decline, and we could be required to record
impairment charges to reduce the carrying values of these assets. Such impairment charges would
reduce our earnings and could have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and
financial condition.
25
Table of Contents
If OC-BVI does not obtain a contract with the BVI Government to sell water to be produced at its
Bar Bay plant, it may not be able to recover the cost of its investment in the plant, which could
adversely affect its operations and in turn decrease the value of our investment in OC-BVI.
OC-BVI has constructed a new desalination plant located on Bar Bay, Tortola, in the British Virgin
Islands. The total cost for this plant is approximately $8.0 million. We have a loan receivable
outstanding from OC-BVI of $2,625,000 for the construction of this plant as of March 31, 2008.
OC-BVI has constructed this plant in response to what it believes is an extreme shortage of, and a
pressing demand for, potable water on the eastern end of Tortola and anticipates entering into a
bulk water supply agreement with the British Virgin Islands government. However, OC-BVI does not presently have any type of agreement or
understanding with the British Virgin Islands government, for the purchase of the water to be
produced by its Bar Bay plant. If such an agreement is not obtained, or is not obtained on
sufficiently favorable terms, OC-BVI may not be able to recover the cost of its investment in this
plant, in which case we may be required to record an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value
of our loan to OC-BVI and our investment in OC-BVI. Such an impairment charge would reduce our
earnings and could have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and financial
condition.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we issued 10,562 common shares to three of our executive
officers under the terms of their executive compensation agreements. The issuance of the shares was
exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 because the executive
officers have knowledge of all material information relating to us.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibit Description | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company | |
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company | |
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Company |
26
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CONSOLIDATED WATER CO. LTD. |
||||
By: | /s/ Frederick W. McTaggart | |||
Frederick W. McTaggart | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: May 12, 2008
27