CORE LABORATORIES N V - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES | ||||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||||
Washington, D.C. 20549 | ||||
FORM 10-Q | ||||
(Mark One) | ||||
Q | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 | ||||
OR | ||||
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
For the transition period from ________________ to ______________ | ||||
Commission File Number: 001-14273 | ||||
CORE LABORATORIES N.V. | ||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | ||||
The Netherlands | Not Applicable | |||
(State of other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |||
incorporation or organization) | ||||
Herengracht 424 | ||||
1017 BZ Amsterdam | ||||
The Netherlands | Not Applicable | |||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |||
(31-20) 420-3191 | ||||
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) | ||||
None | ||||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes Q No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes Q No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer Q | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes ¨ No Q
The number of common shares of the registrant, par value EUR 0.02 per share, outstanding at July 19, 2012 was 47,306,751.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V. | ||
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 | ||
INDEX | ||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Page | ||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | ||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CORE LABORATORIES N.V.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||
ASSETS | (Unaudited) | ||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 23,408 | $ | 29,332 | |||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,117 and $3,762 at 2012 and 2011, respectively | 170,707 | 170,805 | |||||
Inventories | 58,181 | 53,214 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 39,141 | 33,197 | |||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 291,437 | 286,548 | |||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net | 118,665 | 115,295 | |||||
INTANGIBLES, net | 8,335 | 8,221 | |||||
GOODWILL | 163,337 | 162,787 | |||||
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS, net | 13,920 | 13,662 | |||||
OTHER ASSETS | 26,979 | 24,360 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 622,673 | $ | 610,873 | |||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 51,280 | $ | 57,639 | |||
Accrued payroll and related costs | 26,188 | 34,028 | |||||
Taxes other than payroll and income | 8,833 | 8,566 | |||||
Unearned revenue | 18,334 | 19,154 | |||||
Income tax payable | 3,814 | 6,527 | |||||
Short-term debt and capital lease obligations | 623 | 2,344 | |||||
Other accrued expenses | 17,105 | 14,937 | |||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 126,177 | 143,195 | |||||
LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS | 206,053 | 223,075 | |||||
DEFERRED COMPENSATION | 26,384 | 24,117 | |||||
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES, net | 5,798 | 5,531 | |||||
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | 34,108 | 33,300 | |||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 6) | |||||||
EQUITY: | |||||||
Preference shares, EUR 0.02 par value; 6,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding | — | — | |||||
Common shares, EUR 0.02 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 49,037,808 issued and 47,366,753 outstanding at 2012 and 49,037,806 issued and 47,629,472 outstanding at 2011 | 1,376 | 1,376 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 5,908 | 2,012 | |||||
Retained earnings | 363,903 | 283,660 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (1,712 | ) | (1,739 | ) | |||
Treasury shares (at cost), 1,671,055 at 2012 and 1,408,334 at 2011 | (149,088 | ) | (107,406 | ) | |||
Total Core Laboratories N.V. shareholders' equity | 220,387 | 177,903 | |||||
Non-controlling interests | 3,766 | 3,752 | |||||
TOTAL EQUITY | 224,153 | 181,655 | |||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 622,673 | $ | 610,873 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||
REVENUE: | |||||||
Services | $ | 175,749 | $ | 156,841 | |||
Product sales | 71,257 | 68,944 | |||||
Total revenue | 247,006 | 225,785 | |||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: | |||||||
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation expense shown below | 103,926 | 102,651 | |||||
Cost of product sales, exclusive of depreciation expense shown below | 52,454 | 49,622 | |||||
General and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation expense shown below | 10,205 | 9,757 | |||||
Depreciation | 4,788 | 5,507 | |||||
Amortization | 289 | 298 | |||||
Other (income) expense, net | 3,218 | 147 | |||||
OPERATING INCOME | 72,126 | 57,803 | |||||
Loss on exchange of Senior Exchangeable Notes | — | 210 | |||||
Interest expense | 2,178 | 2,499 | |||||
Income before income tax expense | 69,948 | 55,094 | |||||
Income tax expense | 16,997 | 14,710 | |||||
Net income | 52,951 | 40,384 | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | 35 | (67 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 52,916 | $ | 40,451 | |||
EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION: | |||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 1.11 | $ | 0.88 | |||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 1.11 | $ | 0.83 | |||
Cash dividends per share | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.25 | |||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: | |||||||
Basic | 47,473 | 45,945 | |||||
Diluted | 47,791 | 48,662 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||
REVENUE: | |||||||
Services | $ | 338,418 | $ | 298,333 | |||
Product sales | 142,779 | 134,185 | |||||
Total revenue | 481,197 | 432,518 | |||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: | |||||||
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation expense shown below | 201,936 | 195,342 | |||||
Cost of product sales, exclusive of depreciation expense shown below | 103,584 | 93,681 | |||||
General and administrative expenses, exclusive of depreciation expense shown below | 20,379 | 19,281 | |||||
Depreciation | 10,384 | 11,047 | |||||
Amortization | 576 | 589 | |||||
Other (income) expense, net | (1,694 | ) | (1,724 | ) | |||
OPERATING INCOME | 146,032 | 114,302 | |||||
Loss on exchange of Senior Exchangeable Notes | — | 839 | |||||
Interest expense | 4,368 | 4,859 | |||||
Income before income tax expense | 141,664 | 108,604 | |||||
Income tax expense | 34,783 | 22,228 | |||||
Net income | 106,881 | 86,376 | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | 14 | (365 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 106,867 | $ | 86,741 | |||
EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION: | |||||||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 2.25 | $ | 1.90 | |||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 2.23 | $ | 1.77 | |||
Cash dividends per share | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.50 | |||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: | |||||||
Basic | 47,539 | 45,587 | |||||
Diluted | 47,868 | 48,942 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 52,951 | $ | 40,384 | $ | 106,881 | $ | 86,376 | |||||||
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans | |||||||||||||||
Prior service cost | |||||||||||||||
Amortization to net income of transition asset | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | (44 | ) | (44 | ) | |||||||
Amortization to net income of prior service cost | 40 | 40 | 80 | 80 | |||||||||||
Amortization to net income of net loss | — | 84 | — | 168 | |||||||||||
Income taxes on pension and other postretirement benefit plans | (5 | ) | (26 | ) | (9 | ) | (52 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income | 52,964 | 40,460 | 106,908 | 86,528 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | 35 | (67 | ) | 14 | (365 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 52,929 | $ | 40,527 | $ | 106,894 | $ | 86,893 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Net income | $ | 106,881 | $ | 86,376 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Net (recovery) provision for doubtful accounts | 697 | 40 | |||||
Provisions for inventory obsolescence | 193 | 357 | |||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates | (247 | ) | (117 | ) | |||
Stock-based compensation | 8,903 | 5,923 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 10,960 | 11,636 | |||||
Non-cash interest expense | 240 | 4,144 | |||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | (313 | ) | (138 | ) | |||
(Gain) on insurance recovery | (101 | ) | (779 | ) | |||
Loss on exchange of Senior Exchangeable Notes | — | 839 | |||||
Realization of pension obligation | 27 | 152 | |||||
(Increase) decrease in value of life insurance policies | (622 | ) | (685 | ) | |||
Deferred income taxes | (1,835 | ) | (10,735 | ) | |||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | (2,787 | ) | (5,627 | ) | |||
Inventories | (5,160 | ) | (8,886 | ) | |||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (3,489 | ) | 1,055 | ||||
Other assets | (695 | ) | (623 | ) | |||
Accounts payable | (5,285 | ) | 8,639 | ||||
Accrued expenses | (8,728 | ) | (4,729 | ) | |||
Unearned revenue | (820 | ) | 2,649 | ||||
Other long-term liabilities | 3,075 | 8,463 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 100,894 | 97,954 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Capital expenditures | (14,894 | ) | (11,984 | ) | |||
Patents and other intangibles | (684 | ) | (132 | ) | |||
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (556 | ) | — | ||||
Cash (advanced)/settled for acquisition | 2,188 | — | |||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 379 | 171 | |||||
Proceeds from insurance recovery | 101 | 884 | |||||
Premiums on life insurance | (1,288 | ) | (1,243 | ) | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (14,754 | ) | (12,304 | ) | |||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Repayment of debt | (48,744 | ) | (64,477 | ) | |||
Proceeds from debt | 30,000 | — | |||||
Stock options exercised | 5 | 241 | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | 3,466 | 2,289 | |||||
Debt financing costs | (7 | ) | (1,094 | ) | |||
Settlement of warrants | — | (57,777 | ) | ||||
Non-controlling interests - contributions | — | 895 | |||||
Non-controlling interests - dividends | — | (240 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid | (26,624 | ) | (22,709 | ) | |||
Repurchase of common shares | (50,160 | ) | (52,097 | ) | |||
Net cash used in financing activities | (92,064 | ) | (194,969 | ) | |||
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (5,924 | ) | (109,319 | ) | |||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period | 29,332 | 133,880 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | 23,408 | $ | 24,561 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Core Laboratories N.V. and its subsidiaries for which we have a controlling voting interest and/or a controlling financial interest. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States ("U.S.") generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial information using the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required by U.S. GAAP and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the summary of significant accounting policies and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Core Laboratories N.V. uses the equity method of accounting for investments in which it has less than a majority interest and over which it does not exercise control. Non-controlling interests have been recorded to reflect outside ownership attributable to consolidated subsidiaries that are less than 100% owned. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for the periods presented have been included in these financial statements. Furthermore, the operating results presented for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 may not necessarily be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Core Laboratories N.V.'s balance sheet information for the year ended December 31, 2011 was derived from the 2011 audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Certain reclassifications were made to prior period amounts in order to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the reported net income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011.
Additionally, revision adjustments were made between Services Revenue and Product Sales Revenue and between Cost of Services and Cost of Product Sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for 2011 which did not affect total revenues, operating income or net income for the period.
References to "Core Lab", "we", "our" and similar phrases are used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and relate collectively to Core Laboratories N.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
2. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Finished goods | $ | 40,768 | $ | 39,233 | $ | 32,604 | |||||
Parts and materials | 15,410 | 15,934 | 18,004 | ||||||||
Work in progress | 2,003 | 2,952 | 2,606 | ||||||||
Total inventories | $ | 58,181 | $ | 58,119 | $ | 53,214 |
We include freight costs incurred for shipping inventory to customers in the Cost of Sales line of the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
We account for intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, which requires us to evaluate these assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if an indication of impairment has occurred. Based upon our most recent evaluation, we determined that goodwill is not impaired. We amortize intangible assets with a defined term on a straight-line basis over their respective useful lives.
In 2011, we acquired a business providing additional manufacturing capacity for our Canadian operations for $18.8 million in cash. We have accounted for this acquisition by allocating the purchase price to the net assets acquired based on their
estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, resulting in an increase to goodwill of $8.6 million and an increase of $0.5 million in intangible assets. In 2012, a post-closing adjustment was recorded that increased the acquisition and goodwill by $0.6 million. The acquisition was recorded in the Production Enhancement business segment.
4. DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Debt is summarized in the following table (in thousands):
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||
Senior notes | 150,000 | 150,000 | |||||
Credit facility | 56,000 | 73,000 | |||||
Capital lease obligations | 102 | 132 | |||||
Other indebtedness | 574 | 2,287 | |||||
Total debt | 206,676 | 225,419 | |||||
Less - current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations | 623 | 2,344 | |||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net | $ | 206,053 | $ | 223,075 |
In 2011, we issued two series of senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $150 million ("Senior Notes") in a private placement transaction. Series A consists of $75 million in aggregate principal amount of notes that bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.01% and are due in full on September 30, 2021. Series B consists of $75 million in aggregate principal amount of notes that bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.11% and are due in full on September 30, 2023. Interest on each series of the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on March 30 and September 30.
We maintain a credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $300 million at June 30, 2012. The Credit Facility provides an option to increase the commitment under the Credit Facility to $350 million, if certain conditions are met. The Credit Facility bears interest at variable rates from LIBOR plus 1.50% to a maximum of LIBOR plus 2.25%. Any outstanding balance under the Credit Facility is due September 28, 2016 when the Credit Facility matures. Interest payment terms are variable depending upon the specific type of borrowing under this facility. Our available capacity at any point in time is reduced by borrowings outstanding at the time and outstanding letters of credit and performance guarantees and bonds which totaled $16.0 million at June 30, 2012, resulting in an available borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility of $228.0 million. In addition to those items under the Credit Facility, we had $24.9 million of outstanding letters of credit and performance guarantees and bonds from other sources as of June 30, 2012.
The terms of the Credit Facility and the Senior Notes require us to meet certain financial and operational covenants, including, but not limited to, certain operational and minimum equity and cash flow ratios. We were in compliance with all such covenants at June 30, 2012, and expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future. Certain of our material, wholly-owned subsidiaries are guarantors or co-borrowers under the Credit Facility and Senior Notes.
The estimated fair value of total debt at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 approximated the book value of total debt. The fair value was estimated using Level 2 inputs including rates on similar debt recently issued by our peer group.
Other indebtedness includes approximately $0.6 million of debt incurred relating to the financing of our corporate insurance.
5. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
We provide a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of our Dutch employees (the "Dutch Plan") who were hired prior to 2007 based on years of service and final pay or career average pay, depending on when the employee began participating. The benefits earned by the employees are immediately vested. We fund the future obligations of the Dutch Plan by purchasing investment contracts from a large multi-national insurance company. The investment contracts are purchased annually and expire after five years at which time they are replaced with new contracts that are adjusted to include changes in the benefit obligation for the current year and redemption of the expired contracts. We determine the fair value of these plan assets with the assistance of an actuary using observable inputs (Level 2). We make annual premium
payments to the insurance company based on each employee's age and current salary.
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost under this plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 285 | $ | 352 | $ | 572 | $ | 687 | |||||||
Interest cost | 425 | 454 | 853 | 886 | |||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (304 | ) | (211 | ) | (610 | ) | (412 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of transition asset | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | (44 | ) | (44 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 40 | 40 | 80 | 80 | |||||||||||
Amortization of net loss | — | 84 | — | 168 | |||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost | $ | 424 | $ | 697 | $ | 851 | $ | 1,365 |
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we contributed approximately $1.6 million, as determined by the insurance company, to fund the estimated 2012 premiums on investment contracts held by the Dutch Plan.
We have adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows certain highly compensated employees to defer a portion of their salary, commission and bonus, as well as the amount of any reductions in their deferrals under the deferred compensation plan for employees in the United States (the "Deferred Compensation Plan"), due to certain limitations imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"). The Deferred Compensation Plan also provides for employer contributions to be made on behalf of participants equal in amount to certain forfeitures of, and/or reductions in, employer contributions that participants could have received under the 401(k) Plan in the absence of certain limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Employer contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan vest ratably over a period of five years. Contributions to the plan are invested in equity and other investment fund assets within life insurance policies, and carried on the balance sheet at fair value. A participant's plan benefits include the participant's deferrals, the vested portion of the employer's contributions, and deemed investment gains and losses on such amounts. The benefits under these contracts are fully vested and payment of benefits generally commences as of the last day of the month following the termination of services except that the payment of benefits for select executives generally commences on the first working day following a six month waiting period following the date of termination.
On a recurring basis, we use the market approach to value certain assets and liabilities at fair value at quoted prices in an active market (Level 1) and certain assets and liabilities using significant other observable inputs (Level 2). We do not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Gains and losses related to the fair value changes in the deferred compensation assets and liabilities are recorded in General and Administrative Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table summarizes the fair value balances (in thousands):
(Unaudited) | Fair Value Measurement at | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation trust assets | $ | 11,189 | $ | — | $ | 11,189 | $ | — | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan | $ | 17,023 | $ | 3,053 | $ | 13,970 | $ | — |
Fair Value Measurement at | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation trust assets | $ | 9,934 | $ | — | $ | 9,934 | $ | — | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan | $ | 15,141 | $ | 3,086 | $ | 12,055 | $ | — |
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We have been and may from time to time be named as a defendant in legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. These include, but are not limited to, employment-related claims and contractual disputes or claims for personal injury or property damage which occur in connection with the provision of our products and services. Management does not currently believe that any of our pending contractual, employment-related, personal injury or property damage claims and disputes will have a material effect on our future results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
As a result of a fire in 2011 at one of our supplier's facilities that provided certain high performance specialty steel tubulars used with the Company's perforating systems, we filed a claim under our business interruption insurance policy in the amount of $5 million. During the first six months of 2012, we received notice and payment from the insurer that they agreed with $3.4 million of the claim and will continue reviewing the remainder of the claim. As a result, we recorded a gain of $3.4 million. The claim is still open and any additional amounts agreed to will be recorded as a component of "Other (Income) Expense, Net" in that period.
7. EQUITY
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we repurchased 299,104 of our common shares for $37.3 million. Included in this total were rights to 32,311 shares valued at $4.2 million that were surrendered to us pursuant to the terms of a stock-based compensation plan in consideration of the participants' tax burdens that may result from the issuance of common shares under that plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we repurchased 403,383 of our common shares for $50.2 million. Included in this total were rights to 38,590 shares valued at $4.9 million that were surrendered to us pursuant to the terms of a stock-based compensation plan in consideration of the participants' tax burdens that may result from the issuance of common shares under that plan. Such common shares, unless canceled, may be reissued for a variety of purposes such as future acquisitions, non-employee director stock awards or employee stock awards.
In February and May 2012, we paid a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share of common stock. In addition, on July 10, 2012, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share of common stock for shareholders of record on July 20, 2012 and payable on August 20, 2012.
The following table summarizes our changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
(Unaudited) | Common Shares | Additional Paid-In Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Treasury Stock | Non-Controlling Interests | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | $ | 1,376 | $ | 2,012 | $ | 283,660 | $ | (1,739 | ) | $ | (107,406 | ) | $ | 3,752 | $ | 181,655 | |||||||||||
Stock options exercised | — | (60 | ) | — | — | 65 | — | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock based-awards | — | 490 | — | — | 8,413 | — | 8,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit of stock-based awards issued | — | 3,466 | — | — | — | — | 3,466 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares | — | — | — | — | (50,160 | ) | — | (50,160 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | — | — | (26,624 | ) | — | — | — | (26,624 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred pension costs, net of tax | — | — | — | 27 | — | — | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | — | — | 106,867 | — | — | 14 | 106,881 | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2012 | $ | 1,376 | $ | 5,908 | $ | 363,903 | $ | (1,712 | ) | $ | (149,088 | ) | $ | 3,766 | $ | 224,153 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||
Prior service cost | $ | (674 | ) | $ | (734 | ) | |
Transition asset | 226 | 259 | |||||
Unrecognized net actuarial loss | (1,264 | ) | (1,264 | ) | |||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (1,712 | ) | $ | (1,739 | ) |
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
We compute basic earnings per common share by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common and potential common shares include additional shares in the weighted average share calculations associated with the incremental effect of dilutive employee stock options, restricted stock awards and contingently issuable shares, as determined using the treasury stock method. The
following table summarizes the calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding used in the computation of diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding | 47,473 | 45,945 | 47,539 | 45,587 | |||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||
Stock options | 11 | 23 | 12 | 24 | |||||||
Contingent shares | 133 | 68 | 124 | 63 | |||||||
Restricted stock and other | 174 | 230 | 193 | 274 | |||||||
Senior exchangeable notes | — | 1,097 | — | 1,176 | |||||||
Warrants | — | 1,299 | — | 1,818 | |||||||
Weighted average diluted common and potential common shares outstanding | 47,791 | 48,662 | 47,868 | 48,942 |
In 2006, we issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Exchangeable Notes (the "Exchangeable Notes") which were exchangeable into shares of Core Laboratories N.V. common stock under certain circumstances. Included in the table above are 1,097,000 shares which were added to the share count for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 1,176,000 shares which were added to the share count for the six months ended June 30, 2011. These shares were included in calculating the impact to our dilutive earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. All of the Exchangeable Notes were exchanged or reached maturity in 2011.
In 2006, we sold warrants that gave the holders the right to acquire our common shares. Included in the table above are 1,299,000 shares which were added to the share count for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 1,818,000 shares which were added to the share count for the six months ended June 30, 2011, because the average share price exceeded the strike price of the warrants. These shares were included in calculating the impact to our dilutive earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The warrants were fully settled in 2011.
9. OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
The components of other (income) expense, net, were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | $ | (227 | ) | $ | (75 | ) | $ | (313 | ) | $ | (138 | ) | |||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | 1,355 | (9 | ) | 330 | (521 | ) | |||||||||
Interest income | (13 | ) | (30 | ) | (15 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||
Rents and royalties | (255 | ) | (382 | ) | (595 | ) | (833 | ) | |||||||
(Gain) loss on insurance recovery | (101 | ) | (69 | ) | (3,467 | ) | (779 | ) | |||||||
Legal entity realignment | 1,860 | 711 | 1,860 | 711 | |||||||||||
NYSE Euronext Amsterdam listing | 683 | — | 923 | — | |||||||||||
Other, net | (84 | ) | 1 | (417 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||||||
Total other (income) expense, net | $ | 3,218 | $ | 147 | $ | (1,694 | ) | $ | (1,724 | ) |
During the second quarter of 2012, we incurred legal, accounting and other fees in connection with the realignment of certain of our legal entities into a more cost effective structure and the listing of our shares on the NYSE Euronext Amsterdam Stock Exchange.
As a result of a fire in 2011 at one of our supplier's facilities that provided certain high performance specialty steel tubulars used with the Company's perforating systems, we filed a claim under our business interruption insurance policy in the amount of $5 million. During the first quarter of 2012, we received notice from the insurer that they agreed to pay $3.4 million of the claim and will continue reviewing the remainder of the claim. As a result, we recorded a gain of $3.4 million in the first quarter of 2012.
During 2011, as a result of reaching a settlement on a fire damage claim we filed in 2010, we recorded an insurance recovery gain of $0.8 million.
Foreign exchange (gain) loss by currency is summarized in the following table (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Australian Dollar | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (54 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | |||
Canadian Dollar | 519 | (124 | ) | (18 | ) | (543 | ) | ||||||||
Euro | 238 | 8 | (7 | ) | (74 | ) | |||||||||
Malaysian Ringgit | 130 | 3 | 79 | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Mexican Peso | 191 | 41 | 39 | 142 | |||||||||||
Russian Ruble | (16 | ) | (23 | ) | (56 | ) | (225 | ) | |||||||
Other currencies, net | 304 | 140 | 308 | 339 | |||||||||||
Total (gain) loss | $ | 1,355 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 330 | $ | (521 | ) |
10. INCOME TAX EXPENSE
The effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were 24.3% and 26.7%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the year-to-date 2012 and 2011 were 24.6% and 20.5%, respectively.
Included in the six months ended June 30, 2011 is the reversal of $10.4 million in tax liabilities provided over the period of 2007-2010 as a result of audits of prior year returns offset by $3.7 million in other discrete items. The change in income tax expense also reflects the change in activity levels among jurisdictions with different tax rates.
11. SEGMENT REPORTING
We operate our business in three reportable segments: (1) Reservoir Description, (2) Production Enhancement and (3) Reservoir Management. These business segments provide different services and utilize different technologies.
• | Reservoir Description: Encompasses the characterization of petroleum reservoir rock, fluid and gas samples. We provide analytical and field services to characterize properties of crude oil and petroleum products to the oil and gas industry. |
• | Production Enhancement: Includes products and services relating to reservoir well completions, perforations, stimulations and production. We provide integrated services to evaluate the effectiveness of well completions and to develop solutions aimed at increasing the effectiveness of enhanced oil recovery projects. |
• | Reservoir Management: Combines and integrates information from reservoir description and production enhancement services to increase production and improve recovery of oil and gas from our clients' reservoirs. |
Results for these business segments are presented below. We use the same accounting policies to prepare our business segment results as are used to prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements. We evaluate performance based on income or loss before income tax, interest and other non-operating income (expense). All interest and other non-operating income (expense) is attributable to the Corporate & Other area and is not allocated to specific business segments. Summarized financial information concerning our segments is shown in the following table (in thousands):
(Unaudited) | Reservoir Description | Production Enhancement | Reservoir Management | Corporate & Other 1 | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues from unaffiliated customers | $ | 126,462 | $ | 99,547 | $ | 20,997 | $ | — | $ | 247,006 | |||||||||
Inter-segment revenues | 760 | 615 | 785 | (2,160 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) | 38,076 | 29,564 | 7,113 | (2,627 | ) | 72,126 | |||||||||||||
Total assets (at end of period) | 279,823 | 246,837 | 24,756 | 71,257 | 622,673 | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 3,667 | 2,426 | 29 | 1,475 | 7,597 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 3,445 | 902 | 175 | 555 | 5,077 | ||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues from unaffiliated customers | $ | 118,758 | $ | 88,787 | $ | 18,240 | $ | — | $ | 225,785 | |||||||||
Inter-segment revenues | 447 | 357 | 595 | (1,399 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) | 26,629 | 24,500 | 7,307 | (633 | ) | 57,803 | |||||||||||||
Total assets (at end of period) | 272,298 | 208,114 | 19,146 | 52,675 | 552,233 | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 4,079 | 2,499 | 284 | 743 | 7,605 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 3,517 | 1,578 | 169 | 541 | 5,805 | ||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues from unaffiliated customers | $ | 242,568 | $ | 196,280 | $ | 42,349 | $ | — | $ | 481,197 | |||||||||
Inter-segment revenues | 1,296 | 1,083 | 804 | (3,183 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) | 70,491 | 63,095 | 15,028 | (2,582 | ) | 146,032 | |||||||||||||
Total assets | 279,823 | 246,837 | 24,756 | 71,257 | 622,673 | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 6,146 | 4,268 | 440 | 4,040 | 14,894 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 6,992 | 2,500 | 342 | 1,126 | 10,960 | ||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues from unaffiliated customers | $ | 226,379 | $ | 170,885 | $ | 35,254 | $ | — | $ | 432,518 | |||||||||
Inter-segment revenues | 816 | 665 | 954 | (2,435 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) | 53,067 | 47,762 | 13,971 | (498 | ) | 114,302 | |||||||||||||
Total assets | 272,298 | 208,114 | 19,146 | 52,675 | 552,233 | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 7,382 | 3,303 | 391 | 908 | 11,984 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 6,999 | 3,217 | 349 | 1,071 | 11,636 |
(1) "Corporate & Other" represents those items that are not directly related to a particular segment and eliminations.
12. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 relating to fair value measurement (FASB ASC Topic 820), which amends current guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments generally represent clarification of FASB ASC Topic 820, but also include instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05 which provides new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income (FASB ASC Topic 220) in financial statements. Entities are required to present total comprehensive income either in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Under the single-statement approach, entities must include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for comprehensive income. Under the two-statement approach, entities must report an income statement and, immediately following, a statement of other comprehensive income. Under either method, entities must display adjustments for items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in both net income and other comprehensive income. The provisions for this pronouncement are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 relating to testing goodwill for impairment (FASB ASC Topic 350), which amends current guidance to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under this amendment, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This pronouncement is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion summarizes the financial position of Core Laboratories N.V. and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and should be read in conjunction with (i) the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and (ii) the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
General
Core Laboratories N.V. is a Netherlands limited liability company. It was established in 1936 and is one of the world's leading providers of proprietary and patented reservoir description, production enhancement and reservoir management products and services to the oil and gas industry. These products and services can enable our clients to improve reservoir performance and increase oil and gas recovery from their producing fields. Core Laboratories N.V. has over 70 offices in more than 50 countries and employs approximately 5,000 people worldwide.
References to "Core Lab", "we", "our" and similar phrases are used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and relate collectively to Core Laboratories N.V. and its consolidated affiliates.
Our business units have been aggregated into three complementary segments, which provide products and services for improving reservoir performance and increasing oil and gas recovery from new and existing fields.
• | Reservoir Description: Encompasses the characterization of petroleum reservoir rock, fluid and gas samples. We provide analytical and field services to characterize properties of crude oil and petroleum products to the oil and gas industry. |
• | Production Enhancement: Includes products and services relating to reservoir well completions, perforations, stimulations and production. We provide integrated services to evaluate the effectiveness of well completions and to develop solutions aimed at increasing the effectiveness of enhanced oil recovery projects. |
• | Reservoir Management: Combines and integrates information from reservoir description and production enhancement services to increase production and improve recovery of oil and gas from our clients' reservoirs. |
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Certain statements contained in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section, including those under the headings "Outlook" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources", and in other parts of this Form 10-Q, are forward-looking. In addition, from time to time, we may publish forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, research and development activities and similar matters. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate", "continue", or other similar words, including statements as to the intent, belief, or current expectations of our directors, officers, and management with respect to our future operations, performance, or positions or which contain other forward-looking information. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on us. While management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, no assurances can be given that the future results indicated, whether expressed or implied, will be achieved. While we believe that these statements are and will be accurate, our actual results and experience may differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties.
The oil and gas industry is highly cyclical and demand for the majority of our oilfield products and services is substantially dependent on the level of expenditures by the oil and gas industry for the exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas reserves, which are sensitive to oil and natural gas prices and generally dependent on the industry's view of future oil and gas prices. There are numerous factors affecting the supply of and demand for our products and services, which are summarized as:
•general and economic business conditions;
•market prices of oil and gas and expectations about future prices;
•cost of producing and the ability to deliver oil and natural gas;
•the level of drilling and production activity;
•mergers, consolidations and downsizing among our clients;
•coordination by OPEC;
•the impact of commodity prices on the expenditure levels of our clients;
•financial condition of our client base and their ability to fund capital expenditures;
•the physical effects of climatic change, including adverse weather or geologic/geophysical conditions;
• | the adoption of legal requirements or taxation relating to climate change that lower the demand for petroleum-based fuels; |
•civil unrest or political uncertainty in oil producing or consuming countries;
•level of consumption of oil, gas and petrochemicals by consumers;
•changes in existing laws, regulations, or other governmental actions;
•the business opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to and pursued by us;
•availability of services and materials for our clients to grow their capital expenditures; and
•availability of materials and equipment from key suppliers.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For a more detailed discussion of some of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, see "Item 1A - Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as well as the other reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Outlook
We continue our efforts to expand our market presence by opening or expanding facilities in strategic areas and realizing synergies within our business lines. We believe our market presence provides us a unique opportunity to service clients who have global operations in addition to the national oil companies.
We have established internal earnings targets that are based on market conditions existing at the time our targets were established. Based on recent activity levels, we believe that the current level of activities, workflows, and operating margins both outside North America and within North America, particularly that relate to oil development projects, will grow moderately during the remainder of 2012. We believe that deepwater projects worldwide will increase during the remainder of 2012, particularly offshore Africa, the Middle East, Asia Pacific and deepwater Gulf of Mexico. In addition, we believe that activities in unconventional oil-shale reservoirs will increase during the remainder of 2012, not only in North America, but in South America and North Africa as well.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations as a percentage of applicable revenue were as follows (in thousands):
(Unaudited) | Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012/2011 | ||||||||||||||
REVENUE: | ||||||||||||||||
Services | $ | 175,749 | 71 | % | $ | 156,841 | 69 | % | 12 | % | ||||||
Product sales | 71,257 | 29 | % | 68,944 | 31 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||
Total revenue | 247,006 | 100 | % | 225,785 | 100 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of services* | 103,926 | 59 | % | 102,651 | 65 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||
Cost of product sales* | 52,454 | 74 | % | 49,622 | 72 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||
Total cost of services and product sales | 156,380 | 63 | % | 152,273 | 67 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 10,205 | 4 | % | 9,757 | 4 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 5,077 | 2 | % | 5,805 | 3 | % | (13 | )% | ||||||||
Other (income) expense, net | 3,218 | 1 | % | 147 | — | % | 2,089 | % | ||||||||
Operating income | 72,126 | 29 | % | 57,803 | 26 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||
Loss on exchange of Senior Exchangeable Notes | — | — | % | 210 | — | % | (100 | )% | ||||||||
Interest expense | 2,178 | 1 | % | 2,499 | 1 | % | (13 | )% | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 69,948 | 28 | % | 55,094 | 24 | % | 27 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense | 16,997 | 7 | % | 14,710 | 7 | % | 16 | % | ||||||||
Net income | 52,951 | 21 | % | 40,384 | 18 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | 35 | — | % | (67 | ) | — | % | (152 | )% | |||||||
Net income attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 52,916 | 21 | % | $ | 40,451 | 18 | % | 31 | % | ||||||
* Percentage based on applicable revenue rather than total revenue |
(Unaudited) | Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012/2011 | ||||||||||||||
REVENUE: | ||||||||||||||||
Services | $ | 338,418 | 70 | % | $ | 298,333 | 69 | % | 13 | % | ||||||
Product sales | 142,779 | 30 | % | 134,185 | 31 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||
Total revenue | 481,197 | 100 | % | 432,518 | 100 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of services* | 201,936 | 60 | % | 195,342 | 65 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||
Cost of product sales* | 103,584 | 73 | % | 93,681 | 70 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||
Total cost of services and product sales | 305,520 | 63 | % | 289,023 | 67 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 20,379 | 4 | % | 19,281 | 4 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 10,960 | 2 | % | 11,636 | 3 | % | (6 | )% | ||||||||
Other (income), net | (1,694 | ) | — | % | (1,724 | ) | — | % | (2 | )% | ||||||
Operating income | 146,032 | 30 | % | 114,302 | 26 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||
Loss on exchange of Senior Exchangeable Notes | — | — | % | 839 | — | % | (100 | )% | ||||||||
Interest expense | 4,368 | 1 | % | 4,859 | 1 | % | (10 | )% | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 141,664 | 29 | % | 108,604 | 25 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense | 34,783 | 7 | % | 22,228 | 5 | % | 56 | % | ||||||||
Net income | 106,881 | 22 | % | 86,376 | 20 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | 14 | — | % | (365 | ) | — | % | (104 | )% | |||||||
Net income attributable to Core Laboratories N.V. | $ | 106,867 | 22 | % | $ | 86,741 | 20 | % | 23 | % | ||||||
* Percentage based on applicable revenue rather than total revenue |
Operating Results for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
Services Revenue
Services revenue increased to $175.7 million for the second quarter of 2012, up 12% when compared to $156.8 million for the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, services revenue increased to $338.4 million, up 13% when compared to $298.3 million for the same period of 2011. The increase in services revenue was primarily due to our continued focus on worldwide crude-oil related and large natural gas for liquefaction projects, especially those related to the development of deepwater fields offshore West and East Africa, the eastern Mediterranean, and the Gulf of Mexico.
Product Sales Revenue
Revenue associated with product sales increased to $71.3 million for the second quarter of 2012, up 3% from $68.9 million for the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, product sales revenues increased to $142.8 million, up 6% from $134.2 million for the same period of 2011. The increase in product sales revenue was primarily driven by increasing market penetration and the evolution of our patented and proprietary diagnostics technologies and services.
Cost of Services
Cost of services expressed as a percentage of services revenue was 59% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, down from 65% in the same period in 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, cost of services expressed as a percentage of services revenue was 60%, an improvement when compared to 65% in the same period in 2011. During 2012, we recognized the benefit of a lower fixed cost structure that was established in 2011 when restructuring charges and other personnel costs were taken in the second quarter of 2011.
Cost of Product Sales
Cost of product sales expressed as a percentage of product sales revenue was 74% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, up from 72% during the same period in 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, cost of product sales expressed as a
percentage of product sales revenue was 73%, up from 70% during the same period in 2011. The cost of raw materials, especially specialty steel, increased substantially in the second half of 2011 which increased our cost of sales in 2012 as these raw materials are converted to finished goods and sold.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses include corporate management and centralized administrative services that benefit our operations. General and administrative expenses were $10.2 million for the second quarter of 2012, which represents 4% of revenue, unchanged from the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses were $20.4 million, which represents 4% of revenue, consistent with the same period of 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense was $5.1 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to $5.8 million in the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, depreciation and amortization expense was $11.0 million compared to $11.6 million in the same period of 2011.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
The components of other (income) expense, net, were as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of assets | $ | (227 | ) | $ | (75 | ) | $ | (313 | ) | $ | (138 | ) | |||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | 1,355 | (9 | ) | 330 | (521 | ) | |||||||||
Interest income | (13 | ) | (30 | ) | (15 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||
Rents and royalties | (255 | ) | (382 | ) | (595 | ) | (833 | ) | |||||||
(Gain) loss on insurance recovery | (101 | ) | (69 | ) | (3,467 | ) | (779 | ) | |||||||
Legal entity realignment | 1,860 | 711 | 1,860 | 711 | |||||||||||
NYSE Euronext Amsterdam listing | 683 | — | 923 | — | |||||||||||
Other, net | (84 | ) | 1 | (417 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||||||
Total other (income) expense, net | $ | 3,218 | $ | 147 | $ | (1,694 | ) | $ | (1,724 | ) |
During the second quarter of 2012, we incurred legal, accounting and other fees in connection with the realignment of certain of our legal entities into a more cost effective structure and the listing of our shares on the NYSE Euronext Amsterdam Stock Exchange.
As a result of a fire in 2011 at one of our supplier's facilities that provided certain high performance specialty steel tubulars used with the Company's perforating systems, we filed a claim under our business interruption insurance policy in the amount of $5 million. During the first quarter of 2012, we received notice from the insurer that they agreed to pay $3.4 million of the claim and will continue reviewing the remainder of the claim. As a result, we recorded a gain of $3.4 million in the first quarter of 2012.
During 2011, as a result of reaching a settlement on a fire damage claim we filed in 2010, we recorded an insurance recovery gain of $0.8 million.
Foreign exchange (gain) loss by currency is summarized in the following table (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Australian Dollar | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (54 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | |||
Canadian Dollar | 519 | (124 | ) | (18 | ) | (543 | ) | ||||||||
Euro | 238 | 8 | (7 | ) | (74 | ) | |||||||||
Malaysian Ringgit | 130 | 3 | 79 | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Mexican Peso | 191 | 41 | 39 | 142 | |||||||||||
Russian Ruble | (16 | ) | (23 | ) | (56 | ) | (225 | ) | |||||||
Other currencies, net | 304 | 140 | 308 | 339 | |||||||||||
Total (gain) loss | $ | 1,355 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 330 | $ | (521 | ) |
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $2.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $4.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively.
Income Tax Expense
The effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were 24.3% and 26.7%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were 24.6% and 20.5%, respectively.
Included in the six months ended June 30, 2011 is the reversal of $10.4 million in tax liabilities provided over the period of 2007-2010 as a result of audits of prior year returns offset by $3.7 million in other discrete items. The change in income tax expense also reflects the change in activity levels among jurisdictions with different tax rates.
Segment Analysis
Our operations are managed primarily in three complementary segments - Reservoir Description, Production Enhancement and Reservoir Management. The following tables summarize our results by operating segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012/2011 | |||||||||
Revenue: | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Reservoir Description | $ | 126,462 | $ | 118,758 | 6 | % | |||||
Production Enhancement | 99,547 | 88,787 | 12 | % | |||||||
Reservoir Management | 20,997 | 18,240 | 15 | % | |||||||
Consolidated | $ | 247,006 | $ | 225,785 | 9 | % | |||||
Operating income (loss): | |||||||||||
Reservoir Description | $ | 38,076 | $ | 26,629 | 43 | % | |||||
Production Enhancement | 29,564 | 24,500 | 21 | % | |||||||
Reservoir Management | 7,113 | 7,307 | (3 | )% | |||||||
Corporate and Other1 | (2,627 | ) | (633 | ) | NM | ||||||
Consolidated | $ | 72,126 | $ | 57,803 | 25 | % | |||||
(1) "Corporate and Other" represents those items that are not directly related to a particular segment | |||||||||||
"NM" means not meaningful |
Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012/2011 | |||||||||
Revenue: | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Reservoir Description | $ | 242,568 | $ | 226,379 | 7 | % | |||||
Production Enhancement | 196,280 | 170,885 | 15 | % | |||||||
Reservoir Management | 42,349 | 35,254 | 20 | % | |||||||
Consolidated | $ | 481,197 | $ | 432,518 | 11 | % | |||||
Operating income (loss): | |||||||||||
Reservoir Description | $ | 70,491 | $ | 53,067 | 33 | % | |||||
Production Enhancement | 63,095 | 47,762 | 32 | % | |||||||
Reservoir Management | 15,028 | 13,971 | 8 | % | |||||||
Corporate and Other1 | (2,582 | ) | (498 | ) | NM | ||||||
Consolidated | $ | 146,032 | $ | 114,302 | 28 | % | |||||
(1) "Corporate and Other" represents those items that are not directly related to a particular segment | |||||||||||
"NM" means not meaningful |
Reservoir Description
Revenue from the Reservoir Description segment increased 6%, or $7.7 million, to $126.5 million in the second quarter of 2012, compared to $118.8 million in the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, revenues increased 7%, or $16.2 million, to $242.6 million, compared to $226.4 million in the same period of 2011. This segment’s operations, which focus on international crude-oil related products, continued to benefit from large-scale core analyses and reservoir fluids characterization studies in the Asia-Pacific areas, offshore West and East Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean region and the Middle East, including Iraq, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates.
Operating income in the second quarter of 2012 increased by 43%, or $11.4 million, to $38.1 million compared to $26.6 million for the second quarter of 2011. Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased by 33%, or $17.4 million, to $70.5 million compared to $53.1 million for the same period of 2011. Operating margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was 30%, compared to 22% for the same period in 2011. This increase is a result of the reduction of staff during the latter part of 2011 resulting in a lower cost structure in 2012.
Production Enhancement
Revenue from the Production Enhancement segment increased by 12%, or $10.8 million, to $99.5 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $88.8 million in the second quarter of 2011. Revenues increased by 15%, or $25.4 million, to $196.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $170.9 million in the same period of 2011. The revenue increase was primarily due to demand for our stimulation diagnostic services both for fracture diagnostics in North America and flood diagnostics internationally.
Operating income in the second quarter of 2012 increased by 21%, or $5.1 million, to $29.6 million from $24.5 million for the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, operating income increased by 32%, to $63.1 million over the same period of 2011. Operating margins increased to 30% in the second quarter of 2012 from 28% for the same period in 2011. The increase in operating income from 2011 to 2012 was primarily driven by increased revenue from services related to our proprietary and patented diagnostic technologies, such as SpectraChem® Plus+, SpectraScan®, ZeroWash®, our HERO™ line of perforating charges and gun systems and our HTD-Blast™ perforating system, which is used for the perforation of extended-reach horizontal wells in non-conventional reservoirs.
Reservoir Management
Revenue from the Reservoir Management segment increased by 15% to $21.0 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to $18.2 million for the second quarter of 2011. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased by 20% to $42.3 million compared to $35.3 million for the same period of 2011. The increase in revenue was due to ongoing interest in several of our existing multi-client reservoir studies such as the Tight Oil Reservoirs of the Midland Basin study and the Eagle Ford Shale study along with studies of African east coast reservoirs potentials.
Operating income in the second quarter of 2012 decreased 3% to $7.1 million from $7.3 million for the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, operating income was $15.0 million compared to $14.0 million for the same period of 2011. Operating margins decreased to 34% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to 40% for the same period in 2011. The higher margin in the second quarter of 2011 was a result of increased participation in completed projects.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
We have historically financed our activities through cash on hand, cash flows from operations, bank credit facilities, or the issuance of debt and equity financing.
We utilize the non-GAAP financial measure of free cash flow to evaluate our cash flows and results of operations. Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities (which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure) less cash paid for capital expenditures. Management believes that free cash flow provides useful information to investors regarding the cash that was available in the period that was in excess of our needs to fund our capital expenditures and operating activities. Free cash flow is not a measure of operating performance under GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation nor construed as an alternative to operating profit, net income (loss) or cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities, each as determined in accordance with GAAP. Free cash flow does not represent residual cash available for distribution because we may have other non-discretionary expenditures that are not deducted from the measure. Moreover, since free cash flow is not a measure determined in accordance with GAAP and thus is susceptible to varying interpretations and calculations, free cash flow as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. The following table reconciles this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012/2011 | ||||||||
Free cash flow calculation: | (Unaudited) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 100,894 | $ | 97,954 | 3 | % | ||||
Less: cash paid for capital expenditures | 14,894 | 11,984 | 24 | % | ||||||
Free cash flow | $ | 86,000 | $ | 85,970 | — | % |
Free cash flow for the first six months of 2012 was unchanged when compared to the same period in 2011 as the increase in net income for the period was offset by decreases in current and long-term liabilities. In addition, capital expenditures were higher in the first six months of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | % Change | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012/2011 | ||||||||
Cash provided by/(used in): | (Unaudited) | |||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 100,894 | $ | 97,954 | 3 | % | ||||
Investing activities | (14,754 | ) | (12,304 | ) | 20 | % | ||||
Financing activities | (92,064 | ) | (194,969 | ) | (53 | )% | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (5,924 | ) | $ | (109,319 | ) | (95 | )% |
The increase in cash flows from operating activities for the first six months of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 was primarily attributable to increased net income offset by decreases in current and long-term liabilities.
Cash flows used in investing activities were higher during 2012 when compared to 2011 primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures of $14.9 million and $12.0 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The decrease in cash flows used in financing activities for the first six months of 2012 when compared to the same period in 2011 was due to a decrease of $57.8 million in the amount used for settlement of warrants, a decrease of $1.9 million in the amount paid for the repurchase of our common shares, and a decrease of $45.7 million in the amount of net debt reduction. In the first six months of 2011, we settled warrants in the amount of $57.8 million. All of these warrants were settled during 2011. During the first six months of 2012, we repurchased 403,383 shares for an aggregate price of $50.2 million compared to 574,174 shares for an aggregate price of $52.1 million during the same period in 2011. In the first six months of 2012 and 2011, our debt decreased by a net of $18.7 million and $64.5 million, respectively.
Notes, Credit Facilities and Available Future Liquidity
In September 2011, we issued two series of senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $150 million ("Senior Notes") in a private placement transaction. Series A consists of $75 million in aggregate principal amount of notes that bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.01% and are due in full on September 30, 2021. Series B consists of $75 million in aggregate principal amount of notes that bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.11% and are due in full on September 30, 2023. Interest on each series of the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on March 30 and September 30.
We maintain a credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $300 million at June 30, 2012. The Credit Facility provides an option to increase the commitment under the Credit Facility to $350 million, if certain conditions are met. The Credit Facility bears interest at variable rates from LIBOR plus 1.50% to a maximum of LIBOR plus 2.25%. Any outstanding balance under the Credit Facility is due September 28, 2016 when the Credit Facility matures. Interest payment terms are variable depending upon the specific type of borrowing under the Credit Facility. Our available capacity at any point in time is reduced by borrowings outstanding at the time and outstanding letters of credit and performance guarantees and bonds which totaled $16.0 million at June 30, 2012, resulting in an available borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility of $228.0 million. In addition to those items under the Credit Facility, we had $24.9 million of outstanding letters of credit and performance guarantees and bonds from other sources as of June 30, 2012.
The terms of the Credit Facility and the Senior Notes require us to meet certain financial and operational covenants, including, but not limited to, certain operational and minimum equity and cash flow ratios. We were in compliance with all such covenants at June 30, 2012, and expect to remain in compliance for the foreseeable future. Certain of our material, wholly-owned subsidiaries are guarantors or co-borrowers under the Credit Facility and Senior Notes.
Our ability to maintain and grow our operating income and cash flow depends, to a large extent, on continued investing activities. We are a Netherlands holding company and substantially all of our operations are conducted through subsidiaries. Consequently, our cash flow depends upon the ability of our subsidiaries to pay cash dividends or otherwise distribute or advance funds to us. We believe our future cash flows from operations, supplemented by our borrowing capacity and issuances of additional equity, should be sufficient to fund our debt requirements, capital expenditures, working capital, dividend payments and future acquisitions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 relating to fair value measurement (FASB ASC Topic 820), which amends current guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments generally represent clarification of FASB ASC Topic 820, but also include instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05 which provides new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income (FASB ASC Topic 220) in financial statements. Entities are required to present total comprehensive income either in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Under the single-statement approach, entities must include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for comprehensive income. Under the two-statement approach, entities must report an income statement and, immediately following, a statement of other comprehensive income. Under either method, entities must display adjustments for items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in both net income and other comprehensive income. The provisions for this pronouncement are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 relating to testing goodwill for impairment (FASB ASC Topic 350), which amends current guidance to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under this amendment, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This pronouncement is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
A complete discussion of our controls and procedures is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012 at the reasonable assurance level.
Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. Further, the design of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our system of internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 6 of Consolidated Interim Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information about purchases of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended June 30, 2012:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid Per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Program | Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Program (4) | |||||||||
April 30, 2012 (1) | 117,404 | $ | 131.59 | 117,404 | 3,332,434 | ||||||||
May 31, 2012 (2) | 41,527 | 131.77 | 41,527 | 3,336,599 | |||||||||
June 30, 2012 (3) | 140,173 | 116.64 | 140,173 | 3,232,726 | |||||||||
Total | 299,104 | $ | 124.61 | 299,104 |
(1) Contains 10,611 shares valued at approximately $1.4 million, or $131.61 per share, surrendered to us by participants in a stock-based compensation plan to settle any personal tax liabilities which may result from the award in April 2012.
(2) Contains 11,527 shares valued at approximately $1.6 million, or $136.62 per share, surrendered to us by participants in a stock-based compensation plan to settle any personal tax liabilities which may result from the award in May 2012.
(3) Contains 10,173 shares valued at approximately $1.2 million, or $115.90 per share, surrendered to us by participants in a stock-based compensation plan to settle any personal tax liabilities which may result from the award in June 2012.
(4) In connection with our initial public offering in September 1995, our shareholders authorized our Management Board to repurchase up to 10% of our issued share capital for a period of 18 months. This authorization was renewed at subsequent annual or special shareholder meetings. At our annual shareholders’ meeting on May 16, 2012, our shareholders authorized an extension to repurchase 10% of our issued share capital through November 16, 2013. The repurchase of shares in the open market is at the discretion of management pursuant to this shareholder authorization.
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Title | Incorporated by reference from the following documents | |
3.1 | - | Articles of Association of Core Laboratories N.V., as amended (including English translation) | Exhibit 3.1 filed on July 26, 2010 with 10-Q (File No. 001-14273) |
31.1 | - | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith |
31.2 | - | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith |
32.1 | - | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Furnished herewith |
32.2 | - | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Furnished herewith |
101.INS | - | XBRL Instance Document | Filed herewith |
101.SCH | - | XBRL Schema Document | Filed herewith |
101.CAL | - | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | Filed herewith |
101.LAB | - | XBRL Label Linkbase Document | Filed herewith |
101.PRE | - | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | Filed herewith |
101.DEF | - | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | Filed herewith |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant, Core Laboratories N.V., has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CORE LABORATORIES N.V. | |||
Date: | July 20, 2012 | By: | /s/ Richard L. Bergmark |
Richard L. Bergmark | |||
Chief Financial Officer | |||
(Duly Authorized Officer and | |||
Principal Financial Officer) |