CORETEC GROUP INC. - Annual Report: 2021 (Form 10-K)

PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes the accounts of The Coretec Group Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Coretec Industries LLC, a North Dakota limited liability corporation (collectively referred to herein as “the Group” or “Coretec”). References in this Report to “we”, “our”, “us” or the “Company” refer to The Coretec Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary unless context dictates otherwise.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this report, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and financial performance based on certain assumptions. They include opinions, forecasts, intentions, plans, goals, projections, guidance, expectations, beliefs or other statements that are not statements of historical fact. Words such as “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “approximates,” “predicts,” “forecasts,” “potential,” “continue,” or “projects,” or the negative or other variation of such words, and similar expressions may identify a statement as a forward-looking statement. Any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, our goals, strategies, focus and plans, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including statements expressing general optimism about future operating results and the development of our products, are forward-looking statements.

Although forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include, without limitation, those specifically addressed under the heading “Risk Factors” below, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public can read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain additional information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us.

We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made throughout the entirety of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Organizational History 

On June 22, 2017, the Group filed an Amended Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma to change its name from “3DIcon Corporation” to “The Coretec Group Inc.”, which became effective on June 29, 2017.

The Group, formerly known as 3DIcon Corporation, was incorporated on August 11, 1995, under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. Prior to September 30, 2016, the Group’s primary activity had been the raising of capital in order to pursue its goal of becoming a significant participant in the development, commercialization and marketing of next generation 3D display technologies.

On September 30, 2016, Coretec Industries LLC became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Group, and the Group issued an aggregate 15,870 shares of the Group’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock; those shares were subsequently converted into 30,374,363 shares of common stock. 

Overview of the Company.

Coretec’s Technology. The Coretec Group owns intellectual property and patents related to the production and application of engineered silicon to enable new technologies and to improve the lifespan and performance of a variety of materials in a range of industries. The Company is exploring opportunities to use its silicon discoveries and developments to improve the performance of lithium-ion batteries, solid-state LED lights and semiconductors, among other technologies. It is also exploring ways to use its silicon intellectual property to develop optical plastics to advance development of its CSpace 3D imaging chamber.

Cyclohexasilane (CHS). Coretec’s underlying technology is focused on the production of a high-value liquid silicon precursor, cyclohexasilane (“CHS”). A key advantage of CHS is that it remains in liquid form at room temperature and does not convert to a gas until heated above 450°F. CHS is superior to other silicon precursor in many ways compared to materials commonly used for manufacturing silicon-based semiconductors and solar cells (monosilane or trichlorosilane), which have much lower boiling points that require more prescriptive handling that results in higher shipping and handling costs. Using CHS offers several potential technical advantages of using CHS versus common silicon precursors. The Company anticipates that CHS will first be used as an alternative to monosilane or trichlorosilane when adding silicon to lithium ion batteries or when used in manufacturing silicon-based semiconductors.

The Company also envisions long-term potential in several emerging markets where there are opportunities to convert CHS into nanoparticles and nanowires, for such purposes as:

Enhancement of CSpace. The Company’s CSpace segment is developing technologies to produce 360-degree volumetric, high-resolution images in a 3D image chamber. The Company is applying its technical expertise and intellectual property in silicon-based materials to advance commercialization prospects for its CSpace technology.

A key challenge in the evolution of CSpace® is the development of the material used for the image chamber. The Company has explored a variety of glass alternatives. While progress has been made, it has been concluded that limitations remain, primarily in the weight and cost of a glass medium.

A key virtue of having our IP portfolio of silicon-based materials is that we use all of the manufacturing infrastructure and knowledge that is available for optical plastics for the CSpace® image chamber. The benefit to CSpace® is that silicon-based optical plastics can be molded into a broad range of shapes and may enable the development of a much lighter-weight and more affordable image chamber than previous versions.

Near-Term Revenue Opportunities. Opportunities for near-term revenue continue to be explored in battery and microelectronic markets. Interest in the use of silicon in Li-ion batteries continues to increase driven by the growing demand for electrical vehicles, the exploitation of mobile electronics, and energy storage systems for backup power and improved efficiency of home and commercial wind and solar systems. Discussions are ongoing with suppliers of Li-ion battery anode materials that are seeking next generation materials to further increase performance while improving lifetime, charging time, safety and reliability. We believe these suppliers will be well positioned to take advantage of the benefits provided by CHS when combined as a liquid with other solid-based materials. While we believe the use of CHS in Li-ion batteries will provide near term revenue, we also continue to explore revenue opportunities in microelectronics and especially those early adopter markets where advanced microelectronics are being developed in lower volumes and with less price sensitivity. 

Cyclohexasilane Business

The Company’s business model is to identify and commercialize disruptive technologies in silicon serving advanced technology markets. Sources of disruptive technology are licensed technology created by major universities, institutes, national laboratories and other research centers. Where technology does not already exist, the Company intends to sponsor and jointly develop research with its customers.

Coretec is developing, testing, and providing new and/or improved technologies and resulting product solutions for energy-related industries including, but not limited to energy storage, renewable energy, energy conservation, and distributed energy industries. Many of these technologies and resulting product solutions can also be applied to the broader markets of anti-counterfeit packaging, medical devices, electronics, photonics, and displays. The initial technologies and product solutions are based on new innovations in:

Early adoption of these technologies and resulting product solutions is anticipated in markets for energy storage (lithium-ion batteries), solid-state lighting (LEDs), solar energy and printable electronics.

Coretec’s management leverages years of expertise and experience in equipment and services for the energy storage industry, procuring and managing investments and financial services, and in R&D and commercialization of material and chemical technologies.

CHS Business Model

Coretec’s business model includes monitoring the ever-growing catalogue of new technologies and valuable IP for licensing opportunities that could lead to incremental improvements and/or additional features in resulting products or lead to next generation products for use by energy-related industries and is created and held within universities and other parties that may lack financial resources and/or interest to further develop and commercialize them.

Additionally, where needs exist, but new technologies and resulting products are not currently available, the Company aims to conduct research-and-development (“R&D”) activities through sponsored projects performed at major universities, institutes, national laboratories and other research centers. Coretec will leverage existing, world-class expertise, experience, and laboratory facilities in these non-profit entities for R&D, testing, and proof-of-concept studies up to and including studies at the device level that may be required to create commercialization opportunities.

Following these proof-of-concept studies, commercialization opportunities (e.g., manufacturing, marketing, sales) created for its technologies and IP will include, but are not limited to:

CHS Research & Development

Coretec’s priorities for R&D and commercialization are customer- and market-driven and guided by the needs and specifications of the energy-related industries served. Identified customer- and market-driven opportunities include:

Future CHS Revenue

In the future, the Company anticipates revenue from one or more business transactions, such as:

CHS Competition

Based on market research and competitive analysis, the Company believes its CHS technology is unique and provides an advantage in that should allow for 1) high-yield, low-cost production using readily available raw materials, 2) storage, transport and use as a liquid at room temperature 3) processing of the liquid into fibers, particles, and films that, when heated, form silicon, and 4) the creation of doped silicon by doping CHS at an atomic level. Competing silanes provided by numerous manufacturers exist as a gas at room temperature, making them explosive. This results in greater costs for storage, handling, transportation and use. The closest competitor to Coretec’s CHS is cyclopentasilane which exists as a gas at room temperature. Cyclopentasilane has proven costly and difficult to manufacture. Other competitors exist for specific applications. For example, graphene and carbon nanotubes are potential competitors in printable electronics. However, they are only now emerging and require a purification process that is proving costly.    

Coretec’s business and commercialization model is based in part upon establishing joint development partnerships with companies that are commercially successful and financially sound as well as deeply embedded in the supply chains for the aforementioned energy-related products. For example, Coretec is developing a strategic partnership with a domestic supplier of silicon-based materials that will facilitate further development and scale-up of cyclohexasilane (Si6H12) plus chemical derivatives and other materials based on CHS. This strategic partnership will enable Coretec to supply large quantities of these novel silicon materials to those companies interested in producing prototype batteries, electronics, and photovoltaic/solar cells for testing and commercial evaluation. Coretec will continue to seek other such strategic partnerships within the private sector.

CHS - Intellectual Property Status

The Company is currently awaiting evaluation and approval from USPTO of three full applications. In March 2020 the Company filed a full patent application called “Method of preparing CYCLOSILANE” for a cost-effective and scalable method for producing CHS. In June 2021 the Company filed a full patent application called “Surface-functionalized silicon quantum dots” a general method to append dye molecules on a silicon quantum dot, regardless of how the silicon quantum dot is prepared. In February of 2022, the Company filed a full patent application called “Cyclohexasilane for Electrodes” that covers using CHS as a low temperature silicon source to create silicon nitride powders, thin films, or nanoparticles/nanowires to be utilized in silicon anodes.

In addition, the Company filed a provisional patent in August of 2021 for methods to produce quantum dots utilizing CHS. This provisional patent is titled “Routes to Silicon Quantum Dots (CHS & Other Silanes)” and the Company will file the full patent application in August of 2022.

Volumetric 3D Display Business

The Company owns the rights to a patented volumetric 3D display technology that was developed by and with the University of Oklahoma (the “University”) under a Sponsored Research Agreement (“SRA”). The development to date has resulted in multiple technologies, two working laboratory prototypes (Lab Proto 1 and Lab Proto 2), and eight provisional patents. Five of the eight provisional patents have been combined and converted to five utility patents. Under the SRA, the Company has obtained the exclusive worldwide marketing rights to these 3D display technologies.

On May 26, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") approved the patent called "Volumetric Liquid Crystal Display" for rendering a three-dimensional image and converted it to U.S. patent No. 7,537,345. On December 28, 2010, USPTO approved the patent called “Light Surface Display for Rendering a Three-Dimensional Image,” and issued the United States Patent No. 7,858,913. On August 21, 2012, the USPTO approved a continuation patent called “3D Volumetric Display” and issued the US Patent No. 8,247,755. These patents describe the foundation of what is called CSpace® technology (“CSpace”).

Overview of Volumetric 3D Display Technology

Commercialization Strategy and Target Applications

The Company plans to commercialize the CSpace volumetric 3D technology through customer-funded research-and-development contracts and technology licensing agreements for such high-value applications as air-traffic control, design visualization, and medical imaging. The Company plans to develop products for contract engineering and with joint development customers. At this time the Company does not have any commercialized products and does not plan to develop its own products based on the CSpace technology due to the high –value, low-volume nature of the best-fit initial applications for this technology. These applications include but are not limited to the following:

CSpace Competition

Based on market research, we have concluded that the CSpace volumetric technology is unique and advantaged versus other 3D technologies in that it can deliver both 1) a true 360-degree viewing experience for multiple simultaneous users, and 2) high image quality, high reliability and large image size. Rear projection 3D displays such as those from Zecotek, Setred, and EuroLCDs (formerly LC Tech LightSpace) do not provide a 360-degree viewing experience and are typically limited to one or two users. Early proof-of-concept work done on infrared active phosphor displays by 3D Display Laboratories proved to not be scalable due to limited phosphor persistence and vector scanning limitations. While holographic and light-field displays show promise, they do not deliver a true 360-degree viewing experience and cost-effective multiple user systems do not appear feasible due to current and expected pixel density, data bandwidth and compute power limitations.

History of 3D Technology Research and Development at the University of Oklahoma

Beginning in 2007 the University, under an SRA with the Company, undertook the development of high potential 3D display technologies. It is anticipated that Coretec’s technology will play a key role in the continued development of an image space material for CSpace.

3D Technology - Intellectual Property History, Status and Rights

The USPTO approved the pending patent called "Volumetric Liquid Crystal Display" for rendering a three-dimensional image and converted it to US patent No. 7,537,345. On July 16, 2013, USPTO approved the pending patent called “Computer System with Digital Micromirror Device,” and issued US patent No. 8,487,865.

CSpace Patents are as follow: On December 28, 2010, USPTO approved the pending patent called “Light Surface Display for Rendering a Three-Dimensional Image,” and issued the US Patent No. 7,858,913. On August 21, 2012, the USPTO approved a continuation patent called “3D Volumetric Display” and issued the US Patent No. 8,247,755. On December 13, 2011, USPTO approved a continuation patent called “3D Light Surface Display,” and issued the US Patent No. 8,075,139.

Through an SRA with the University, we have obtained the exclusive worldwide marketing rights to certain 3D display technologies under development by the University. The development to date has resulted in the University filing eight provisional patents; five of the eight provisional patents have been combined and converted to five utility U.S. patents, one Japanese patent, and one pending European patent.

In addition, the Company owns exclusively two U.S. patents as noted below.

Key Patents Exclusively Licensed to the Company from the University of Oklahoma:

United States Patents Granted

International Patents Granted-Japan

International Patents Pending-Europe

Key U.S. Patents Exclusively Owned by the Company:

Recent Developments 

On October 4, 2019 the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and related convertible promissory note with Diversified Alpha Fund of Navigator Global Fund Manager Platform SPC, a Grand Cayman entity (the “Lender”). As of December 31, 2021, there was outstanding principal under the Credit Agreement and related convertible promissory note in the amount of $1,310,617.

On June 30, 2020, the Company accepted the retirement and resignations of Ron Robinson, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Judith Keating, Corporate Secretary of the Company. Matthew Hoffman, who joined the Company in May of 2020, was appointed CFO and Corporate Secretary effective June 30, 2020. On June 23, 2021, the Company renewed the CFO and Corporate Secretary contract with Matthew L. Hoffman under similar terms of the initial contract. The new agreement expires on May 31, 2022.

On June 30, 2020 the Company moved headquarters and operations from Tulsa, Oklahoma to Ann Arbor, Michigan.

On June 25, 2020, the Company entered into a supply agreement with Evonik Operations GmbH to purchase 500 grams of cyclohexasilane, Si6H12 (CHS) for $185,000. The supply agreement will enable the Company to deliver initial quantities of CHS for sales and R&D evaluation to its customer base. The supply agreement was valid until March 31, 2021. The Company paid Evonik Operations GmbH $92,500 on July 20, 2020, to initiate production of CHS, in accordance with the agreement. . Evonik has produced and delivered 150 grams of CHS as of December 31, 2021 and upon remaining product delivery and invoicing, the Company will owe the remaining $92,500

On October 29, 2020, the Company moved the trading of its securities to the OTCQB, also known as the Venture Market, from OTC Pink market. The fee for listing on the OTCQB market is $12,000 per annum, with a one-time application fee of $2,500. The OTCQB market is the middle tier of the OTC Markets and consists of early-stage and developing U.S. and international companies.

On March 2, 2021 (the “Signing Date”), Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with a single institutional investor (the “Investor”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a private placement (i) 23,500,000 shares of its common stock (the “Shares”), (ii) pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 51,500,000 shares of its common stock (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”), and (iii) warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to an aggregate of 82,500,000 shares of its common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $6,000,000. The combined purchase price for one share of common stock and associated Warrant is $0.08 and for one Pre-Funded Warrant and associated Warrant is $0.0799. The sale of the securities under the Purchase Agreement closed on March 5, 2021.

The Warrants are exercisable for a period of five-and one-half years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $0.08 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Warrants for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar events. The Investor may exercise the Warrant on a cashless basis if the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant (the “Warrant Shares”) are not then registered pursuant to an effective registration statement. The Investor has contractually agreed to restrict its ability to exercise the Warrant such that the number of shares of the Company’s common stock held by the Investor and its affiliates after such exercise does not exceed the Beneficial Ownership Limitation set forth in the Warrant which may not exceed initially 4.99% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price of $0.0001 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Pre-Funded Warrants for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar events.  The Pre-Funded Warrants will be exercisable immediately and may be exercised at any time until all of the Pre-Funded Warrants are exercised in full.

In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Investor. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company was required to file a resale registration statement (the "Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register for resale of the Shares, Warrant Shares and shares issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants, within 20 days of the Signing Date, and to have such Registration Statement declared effective within 45 days after the Signing Date in the event the Registration Statement is not reviewed by the SEC, or 90 days of the Signing Date in the event the Registration Statement is reviewed by the SEC. 

In support of the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into an engagement with H.C. Wainwright & Co. (HCW) to act as exclusive agent, advisor or underwriter in any offering of securities by the Company. Compensation to HCW includes 8.0% cash fee of gross proceeds and warrant coverage equal to 8% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock placed in each offering at an exercise price equal to 125% of the offering price per share available over a 5-year term. The Company will also pay HCW (a) a management fee equal to 1.0% of the gross proceeds raised in each Offering; (b) $35,000 for non-accountable expenses (c) up to $50,000 for fees and expenses of legal counsel and other out-of-pocket expenses. The initial term of the agreement is for one month.

The securities above were offered and sold pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act since, among other things, the transactions did not involve a public offering.

On April 7, 2021, the Company granted options (“Options”) to purchase a total of 18,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0002 per share (the “Common Stock”) at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The Options are exercisable for a period of five (5) years from the date of issuance. Of the 18,000,000 total Options granted, (i) Options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock were granted to Victor Keen, the Company’s co-chairman; (ii) Options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Simon Calton, the Company’s co-chairman (iii) Options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Ron Dombrowski, a Director of the Company’s Board of Directors; (iv) Options to purchase 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Michael Kraft, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; (v) Options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Matthew Hoffman, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer; and (vi) Options to purchase an aggregate of 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to various employees and consultants of the Company. Specific individuals and positions held are relative to the time of the grant awards.

On September 30, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the cancellation and reissuance of the following Options previously granted to various members of management: (i) 6,000,000 Options of Matthew Kappers, (ii) 2,000,000 Options of Matthew L. Hoffman, (iii) 2,000,000 Options of Victor F. Keen, (iv) 2,000,000 Options of Simon Calton, (v) 1,000,000 Options of Ron Dombrowski, and (vi) 4,000,000 Options of Michael Kraft. In addition, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the cancellation and reissuance of an aggregate of 6,000,000 Options previously granted to employees and consultants of the Company. The options issued on September 30, 2021 have an exercise price of the $0.105.

On September 30, 2021, the Company granted five-year options to members of the Company’s management, employees and consultants, as incentive compensation. The Company granted the following options: (i) 2,000,000 options to Matthew Kappers, (ii) 1,000,000 options to Matthew L. Hoffman, (iii) 3,000,000 options to Victor F. Keen, (iv) 3,000,000 options to Simon Calton, (v) 2,000,000 options to Ron Dombrowski, (vi) 2,000,000 options to Doug Freitag, (vii) and an aggregate of 2,500,000 ptions to employees and consultants of the Company. The options issued on September 30, 2021 have an exercise price of the $0.105.

On March 31, 2021, DAF provided notice to convert $50,000 of debt at the stated conversion price of $0.0329 per share, resulting in an issuance of 1,519,757 common shares.

On April 29, 2021, DAF provided notice to convert $180,000 of debt at the stated conversion price of $0.0329 per share, resulting in an issuance of 5,471,125 common shares.

On October 27, 2021, DAF provided notice to convert $35,243 of debt at the stated conversion price of $0.0329 per share, resulting in an issuance of 1,077,746 common shares.

On June 21, 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Matthew J. Kappers as Chief Executive Officer. Kappers will operate in the CEO role as an independent contractor for the period of June 15, 2021 through December 15, 2021. Kappers will be compensated at a monthly rate of $12,500 and received an option grant to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock. The options were fully vested pursuant to the Board of Directors consent, effective September 30, 2021. As a result of Mr. Kappers’ appointment, Michael Kraft transitioned to President and will continue to focus on commercialization of CHS and expanding the IP portfolio. In addition, Mr. Kappers was also appointed to the Board of Directors.

On September 30, 2021, the Board of Directors of The Coretec Group, Inc. (the “Company”) approved The Coretec Group, Inc. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which covers the potential issuance of 62,000,000 shares of common stock, from which various awards may be granted, including but not limited to: (a) Incentive Stock Options, (b) Non-qualified Stock Options, (c) Stock Appreciation Rights, (d) Restricted Awards, (e) Performance Share Awards, and (f) Performance Cash Awards.

On September 30, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Douglas Freitag to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Freitag, age 66, brings a wealth of experience to his new role as a member of the Board of Directors. Since 1993, Mr. Freitag has supported organizations as the founder and owner of Bayside Materials Technology, including but not limited to Dow Corning, SCHOTT Government Services, LLC, Aduro Biotech, Cerus, DNA Electronics, General Electric, Triton Systems, UDRI, Avery Dennison, DuPont, Ancon Technologies, Honeywell, and Lockheed Martin. Mr. Freitag supported these organizations in the research, development and transition of new technologies and federal business development. Mr. Freitag also previously served as a Director and Vice President of Technology for the Company until his resignation on August 20, 2017, and has continued to serve as a consultant to the Company.

In connection with Mr. Freitag’s appointment, the Company granted Mr. Freitag, under the Plan, five-year non-qualified options (“Options”) to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share equal to $0.105.

No arrangement or understanding exists between Mr. Freitag and any other persons pursuant to which he was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Freitag has not engaged in any transaction, since January 1, 2020, or any currently proposed transaction, in which the Company was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

On January 11, 2022, the Company announced that it had partnered with The University of Adelaide, one of the global top universities in the field of applied glass science and photonics, to develop a glass to be used in the Company’s CSpace, a 3D static volumetric display technology. This project will be jointly funded by The University of Adelaide.

On January 25, 2022, the Company named Katie Merx its Vice President of Communications. Merx will have overall responsibility for the Company’s global communications, including brand messaging, corporate and financial communications, executive support, and media relations.

Employees

We have built an experienced team of professionals to realize our company goals:

None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider relations with our employees to be good. 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risks Relating to Our Businesses

We have a limited operating history, as well as a history of operating losses.

We have a limited operating history. We cannot assure you that we can achieve revenue or sustain revenue growth or profitability in the future. We have a cumulative net loss of $13,481,989 for the period from inception (June 2, 2015) to December 31, 2021. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise. Unanticipated problems, expenses, and delays are frequently encountered in establishing a new business and marketing and developing products. These include, but are not limited to, competition, the need to develop customers and market expertise, market conditions, sales, marketing and governmental regulation. Our failure to meet any of these conditions would have a materially adverse effect upon us and may force us to reduce or curtail our operations. Revenues and profits, if any, will depend upon various factors. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have an adverse impact on our business.

We may be unable to successfully integrate and develop the vertical synergies anticipated by or complete all obligations under the Share Exchange Agreement.

We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits from the May 31, 2016 Share Exchange Agreement, such as increased earnings, cost savings and revenue enhancements, for various reasons, including difficulties integrating operations and personnel, higher than expected acquisition and operating costs, unknown liabilities, inaccurate reserve estimates and fluctuations in markets. If these benefits do not meet the expectations of financial or industry analysts, the market price of our shares may decline.

Our research and development efforts with respect to new technologies may not result in customer or market acceptance. Some or all of those technologies may not successfully make the transition from the research and development stage to cost-effective production as a result of technology problems, competitive cost issues, yield problems, and other factors. Even if we successfully complete a research and development effort with respect to a particular technology, our customers may decide not to introduce or may terminate products utilizing the technology for a variety of reasons, including difficulties with other suppliers of components for the products, superior technologies developed by our competitors and unfavorable comparisons of our solutions with these technologies, price considerations and lack of anticipated or actual market demand for the products.

Our business could be harmed if we are unable to develop and utilize new technologies that address the needs of our customers, or our competitors or customers develop and utilize new technologies more effectively or more quickly than we can. Any investments made to enhance or develop new technologies that are not successful could have an adverse effect on our net revenue and operating results.

Fluctuations in direct or indirect raw material costs could have an adverse impact on our business.

The availability and prices of raw material inputs may be influenced by supply and demand, changes in world politics, unstable governments in exporting nations, the COVID-19 pandemic and inflation. The prices of our direct and indirect raw materials have been, and we expect them to continue to be, volatile. If the cost of direct or indirect raw materials increases significantly and we are unable to offset the increased costs with higher selling prices, our profitability will decline. Additionally, we may not be able to obtain lower prices from our suppliers should our sale prices decrease. Increases in prices for our products could also hurt our ability to remain both competitive and profitable in the markets in which we compete.

Future raw material prices may be impacted by new laws or regulations, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, changes in our supplier manufacturing processes as some of our products are byproducts of these processes, interruptions in production by suppliers, natural disasters, volatility in the price of crude oil and related petrochemical products and changes in exchange rates.

We operate in industries that are subject to significant fluctuation in supply and demand and ultimately pricing that affects our revenue and profitability.

Many of the markets we intend to serve, such as the LED lighting industry and the Electric Vehicle battery market, are in the relatively early stages of adoption and are characterized by constant and rapid technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving standards, short product life cycles and fluctuations in product supply and demand. These types of LED industries have experienced significant fluctuations, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, product cycles and changes in general economic conditions. As the markets for our products mature, additional fluctuations may result from variability and consolidations within the industry’s customer base. These fluctuations have been characterized by lower product demand, production overcapacity, higher inventory levels and increased pricing pressure. These fluctuations have also been characterized by higher demand for key components and equipment expected to be used in, or in the manufacture of, our products resulting in longer lead times, supply delays and production disruptions. 

We operate in a highly competitive industry.

The silane chemical markets are global, capital intensive and highly competitive. Our competitors may have greater financial resources, as well as other strategic advantages, to maintain, improve and possibly expand their facilities, and as a result, they may be better positioned to adapt to changes in the industry or the global economy. The advantages that our competitors have over us could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, new entrants may increase competition in our industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. An increase in the use of substitutes for certain of our products also could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operations.

Environmental, health and safety regulation—Compliance with extensive environmental, health and safety laws could require material expenditures or changes in our operations.

Our operations are subject to extensive environmental, health and safety laws and regulations at national, international and local levels in numerous jurisdictions. In addition, our production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal and, in some circumstances, revocation. The nature of the chemicals industry exposes us to risks of liability under these laws and regulations due to the production, storage, transportation, disposal and sale of chemicals and materials that can cause contamination or personal injury if released into the environment.

A reduction or disruption in our supplies, or an incorrect forecast, could negatively impact our business.

Our production capacity could be affected by manufacturing problems. Difficulties in the production process could reduce yields or interrupt production, and, as a result of such problems, we may not be able to deliver products on time or in a cost-effective, competitive manner. As the complexity of both our products and our fabrication processes has become more advanced, manufacturing tolerances have been reduced and requirements for precision have become more demanding. In the past, we have experienced delays in delivery and product quality. Our failure to adequately manage our capacity or maintain product quality could have a negative impact on net sales and harm our customer relationships.

Furthermore, we may suffer disruptions in our manufacturing operations, either due to production difficulties such as those described above or as a result of external factors beyond our control. We manufacture combustible materials in our manufacturing process and are therefore subject to the risk of explosions and fires, which can cause major disruptions to our operations. If operations at a manufacturing facility are interrupted, we may not be able to shift production to other facilities on a timely basis or at all. In addition, certain of our products are only capable of being produced at a single manufacturing facility due to unique manufacturing requirements and to the extent that any of these facilities fail to produce these products, this risk will be increased. Even if a transfer is possible, transitioning production of a particular material can take between three to six months to accomplish, and in the interim period we would likely suffer extensive or total supply disruption and incur substantial costs. Such an event could have a material negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to meet customer demands also depends on our ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of materials, parts and components from our suppliers. From time to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit the amounts supplied to us or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors. Supply disruptions may also occur due to shortages in critical resources, such as lithium aluminum hydride, other specialized chemicals or energy or other general supplier disruptions. A reduction or interruption in supplies or a significant increase in the price of one or more supplies could have a material negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we do not keep pace with technological innovations, our future products may not remain competitive and our operating results may suffer.

We operate in rapidly changing highly competitive markets. Technological advances, the introduction of new products and new design techniques could adversely affect our business unless we are able to adapt to changing conditions. Technological advances could render our solutions less competitive or obsolete, and we may not be able to respond effectively to the technological requirements of evolving markets. Therefore, we will be required to expend substantial funds for and commit significant resources to enhancing and developing new technology which may include purchasing advanced design tools and test equipment, hiring additional highly qualified engineering and other technical personnel, and continuing and expanding research and development activities on existing and potential human interface solutions.

We may not be able to achieve the target specifications for the second and third generation CSpace laboratory prototypes.

The process of developing new highly technical products and solutions is inherently complex and uncertain. It requires accurate anticipation of customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends. We must make long-term investments and commit significant resources before knowing whether these investments will eventually result in products that achieve customer acceptance and generate the revenues required to provide desired returns. If we fail to achieve and meet our target specifications in the development of the second and third generation CSpace laboratory prototypes, we could lose market position and customers to our competitors and that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to secure funding necessary to develop our CSpace technology

An important part of our business strategy related to CSpace is the development of a new polymer medium. If we are unable to secure research and development funding or customer funded development contracts to support polymer advancement, we will likely not be able to develop our CSpace technology. Without a new polymer medium for CSpace we will not be able to successfully implement our business strategy for our volumetric 3D Display products, which could cause harm to our competitive position and financial condition.  

We may not be able to successfully license the Coretec technology to customers.

We believe that a significant portion of our expected future revenues will be generated through licensing our technology to third parties such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Siemens, and General Electric.  However, there is no guarantee we will be able to successfully license our technology to such companies or to other third parties.  If we fail to successfully license our technology, it could negatively impact our revenue stream and financial condition.

We may not be able to compete successfully in the markets applicable to our volumetric 3D display and silicon products technology.

Although the volumetric 3D display and silicon products technology that we are attempting to develop is new, and although at present we are aware of only a limited number of companies that have publicly disclosed their attempts to develop similar technology, we anticipate a number of companies are or will attempt to develop technologies/products that compete or will compete with our technologies. Further, even if we are the first to market with a technology of this type, and even if the technology is protected by patents or otherwise, because of the vast market and communications potential of such a product, we anticipate the market will be flooded by a variety of competitors (including traditional display companies and silicon companies), many of which will offer a range of products in areas other than those in which we compete, which may make such competitors more attractive to prospective customers. In addition, many if not all of our competitors and potential competitors will initially be larger and have greater financial resources than we do. Some of the companies with which we may now be in competition, or with which we may compete in the future, have or may have more extensive research, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and significantly greater technical and personnel resources than we do, and may be better positioned to continue to improve their technology in order to compete in an evolving industry. Further, technology in this industry may evolve rapidly once an initially successful product is introduced, making timely product innovations and use of new technologies essential to our success in the marketplace. The introduction by our competitors of products with improved technologies or features may render any product we initially market obsolete and unmarketable. If we or our partners are not able to deliver to market products that respond to industry changes in a timely manner, or if our products do not perform well, our business and financial condition will be adversely affected. 

The technologies being developed may not gain market acceptance.

The products that we are currently developing utilize new technologies. As with any new technologies, in order for us to be successful, these technologies must gain market acceptance. Since the technologies that we anticipate introducing to the marketplace will exploit or encroach upon markets that presently utilize or are serviced by products from competing technologies, meaningful commercial markets may not develop for our technologies. 

In addition, the development efforts of the 3D technology are subject to unanticipated delays, expenses or technical or other problems, as well as the possible insufficiency of funding to complete development. Our success will depend upon the ultimate products and technologies meeting acceptable cost and performance criteria, and upon their timely introduction into the marketplace. The proposed products and technologies may never be successfully developed, and even if developed, they may not satisfactorily perform the functions for which they are designed. Additionally, these may not meet applicable price or performance objectives. Unanticipated technical or other problems may occur which would result in increased costs or material delays in their development or commercialization.

If we are unable to successfully retain existing management and recruit qualified personnel having experience in our business, we may not be able to continue our operations.

Our success depends to a significant extent upon the continued services of our Board of Directors, management officers and other technical advisors.  Our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain key executive officers and team members. At this time, we have a full business team covering all functional areas. If we are unable to successfully retain existing management and recruit qualified personnel having experience in our business, we may not be able to continue our operations.

In the past, we have identified conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and it is possible that we may identify conditions and events in the future that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have identified conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for a year following the balance sheet date of these consolidated financial statements. With the completion of the private placement in March 2021, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements more than one year from the date of this report. Consequently, the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern has been alleviated. However, we have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. In the future, if we are unable to obtain sufficient funding to support our operations, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate all of our research and development programs, product portfolio expansion or commercialization efforts, and our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected and we may be unable to continue as a going concern. In the future, reports from our independent registered public accounting firm may also contain statements expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we seek additional financing to fund our business activities in the future and there remains substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, investors or other financing sources may be unwilling to provide additional funding to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. See Part II, Item 5, Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities for a description of the private placement.

We will need significant additional capital, which we may be unable to obtain.

Our capital requirements in connection with our development activities and transition to commercial operations have been and will continue to be significant. As of March 21, 2022, we do not expect to require additional funding through December 2022 to continue research, development and testing of our technologies, to obtain intellectual property protection relating to our technologies when appropriate, and to improve and market our technologies. However, there can be no assurances that we will not need additional funding in the future or that our current cash position will be sufficient to fund any future plans to accelerate our commercialization efforts. In the event additional funding is necessary, there can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

If we fail to establish, maintain and enforce intellectual property rights with respect to our technology and/or licensed technology, our financial condition, results of operations and business could be negatively impacted.

Our ability to establish, maintain and enforce intellectual property rights with respect to our technology will be a significant factor in determining our future financial and operating performance. We seek to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on a combination of patent, trade secret and copyright laws. We also use confidentiality and other provisions in our agreements that restrict access to and disclosure of its confidential know-how and trade secrets.

Outside the patents and pending patent applications directly granted to us, we seek to protect our technology as trade secrets and technical know-how. However, trade secrets and technical know-how are difficult to maintain and do not provide the same legal protections provided by patents. In particular, only patents will allow us to prohibit others from using independently developed technologies that are similar. If competitors develop knowledge substantially equivalent or superior to our trade secrets and technical know-how or gain access to our knowledge through other means such as observation of our technology that embodies trade secrets at customer sites that we do not control, the value of our trade secrets and technical know-how would be diminished. 

While we strive to maintain systems and procedures to protect the confidentiality and security of our trade secrets and technical know-how, these systems and procedures may fail to provide an adequate degree of protection. For example, although we generally enter into agreements with our employees, consultants, advisors, and strategic partners restricting the disclosure and use of trade secrets, technical know-how and confidential information, we cannot provide any assurance that these agreements will be sufficient to prevent unauthorized use or disclosure. In addition, some of the technology deployed at customer sites in the future, which we do not control, may be readily observable by third parties who are not under contractual obligations of non-disclosure, which may limit or compromise our ability to continue to protect such technology as a trade secret.

While we are not currently aware of any infringement or other violation of our intellectual property rights, monitoring and policing unauthorized use and disclosure of intellectual property is difficult. If we learned that a third party was in fact infringing or otherwise violating our intellectual property, we may need to enforce our intellectual property rights through litigation. Litigation relating to our intellectual property may not prove successful and might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

If our technology is licensed to customers at some point in the future, the strength of the intellectual property under which we would grant licenses can be a critical determinant of the value of such potential licenses. If we are unable to secure, protect and enforce our intellectual property now and in the future, it may become more difficult for us to attract such customers.  Any such development could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We may face claims that we are violating the intellectual property rights of others.

Although we are not aware of any potential violations of others’ intellectual property rights, we may face claims, including from direct competitors, other companies, scientists or research universities, asserting that our technology or the commercial use of such technology infringes or otherwise violates the intellectual property rights of others. We cannot be certain that our technologies and processes do not violate the intellectual property rights of others. If we are successful in developing technologies that allow us to earn revenues and our market profile grows, we could become increasingly subject to such claims.

We may also face infringement claims from the employees, consultants, agents and outside organizations we have engaged to develop our technology. While we have sought to protect ourselves against such claims through contractual means, we cannot provide any assurance that such contractual provisions are adequate, and any of these parties might claim full or partial ownership of the intellectual property in the technology that they were engaged to develop.

If we were found to be infringing or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of others, we could face significant costs to implement work-around methods, and we cannot provide any assurance that any such work-around would be available or technically equivalent to our potential technology. In such cases, we might need to license a third party’s intellectual property, although any required license might not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to work around such infringement or obtain a license on acceptable terms, we might face substantial monetary judgments against us or an injunction against continuing to use or license such technology, which might cause us to cease operations 

In addition, even if we are not infringing or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of others, we could nonetheless incur substantial costs in defending ourselves in suits brought against us for alleged infringement. Also, if we are to enter into a license agreement in the future and it provides that we will defend and indemnify our customer licensees for claims against them relating to any alleged infringement of the intellectual property rights of third parties in connection with such customer licensees’ use of such technologies, we may incur substantial costs defending and indemnifying any customer licensees to the extent they are subject to these types of claims. Such suits, even if without merit, would likely require our management team to dedicate substantial time to addressing the issues presented. Any party bringing claims might have greater resources than we do, which could potentially lead to us settling claims against which we might otherwise prevail on the merits.

Any claims brought against us or any customer licensees alleging that we have violated the intellectual property of others could have negative consequences for our financial condition, results of operations and business, each of which could be materially adversely affected as a result.  

At this time, we do not own all of the intellectual property in Volumetric Liquid Crystal Display or Light Surface Display for Rendering Three-Dimensional Images, and, apart from the SRA with the University and the exclusive worldwide marketing rights thereto, we have no contracts or agreements pending to acquire the intellectual property. Also, at this time, we do not own all of the intellectual property in silicon precursor uses or poly-silanes and apart from the provisional patents we have filed, which have claims which may or may not be granted, we have no contracts or agreements pending to acquire additional intellectual property in this arena.

Although we have obtained exclusive worldwide marketing rights to “Volumetric Liquid Crystal Display” and “Light Surface Display for Rendering Three-Dimensional Images”, two technologies vital to our business and growth strategy, we do not own all of the intellectual property in these technologies.  Although our exclusive worldwide marketing rights to these technologies stand alone and are independent of the SRA, outside of our SRA with the University, we have no pending agreements to obtain or purchase ownership over all intellectual property in these technologies.  Should the University lose their rights in such technologies or we are otherwise unable to utilize the rights obtained in such agreements it would be difficult to successfully implement our business strategy going forward and our stock value would likely decrease. In addition, we have filed three full patent applications and one provisional patent in the cyclohexasilane (CHS) space, and although we anticipate filing additional provisional patents as we develop applications using CHS, these patents have claims within that may or may not be granted and any such change to these patent applications would make it difficult to successfully implement our business strategy going forward and our stock value would likely decrease. 

We do not currently own any patents related to our silicon-based business.  

We do not currently own any patents related to our silicon-based businesses; however, The Coretec Group has filed three full patent applications and one provisional patent in the silicon-based business.

Risks Relating to Our Current Financing Arrangements:

There are a large number of shares underlying our convertible debt and warrants that may be available for future sale and the sale of these shares may depress the market price of our common stock.

As of March 21, 2022, we had 255,615,791 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and convertible debt outstanding that may be converted into an estimated 39,836,388 shares of common stock and outstanding pre-funded warrants to purchase 51,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.0001. We also have outstanding warrants issued to purchase 2,604,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.052, outstanding warrants issued to purchase 82,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.08, and outstanding warrants issued to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.010. The sale of the shares underlying the convertible debt and warrants may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

As of March 21, 2022, we have 1,244,384,209 unissued authorized shares available. 

The issuance of shares upon conversion of outstanding Series A Stock, the convertible debt or the exercise of outstanding warrants may cause immediate and substantial dilution to our existing stockholders.

The issuance of shares upon conversion of our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, convertible debt and exercise of warrants would result in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders since the selling stockholders may ultimately convert and sell the full amount issuable on conversion.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock:

The price of our common stock is volatile and fluctuations in our operating results and announcements and developments concerning our business affect our stock price, which may cause investment losses for our stockholders.

The market for our common stock is highly volatile and the trading price of our stock on the OTCQB Marketplace is subject to wide fluctuations in response to, among other things, operating results, the number of stockholders desiring to sell their shares, changes in general economic conditions and the financial markets, the execution of new contracts and the completion of existing agreements and other developments affecting us. In addition, statements or changes in opinions, ratings, or earnings estimates made by brokerage firms or industry analysts relating to our market or relating to us could result in an immediate and adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. The highly volatile nature of our stock price may cause investment losses for our shareholders. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. If securities class action litigation is brought against us, such litigation could result in substantial costs while diverting management’s attention and resources.

Our common stock is subject to the "Penny Stock" rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) sales practice requirements may limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our common stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Our stock is thinly traded, so you may be unable to sell your shares at or near the quoted bid prices if you need to sell a significant number of your shares.

The shares of our common stock are thinly traded on the OTCQB Marketplace, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent.  As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained. Due to these conditions, we can give you no assurance that you will be able to sell your shares at or near bid prices or at all if you need money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market.

From time to time, certain of our stockholders may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of common stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, subject to certain limitations. In general, pursuant to amended Rule 144, non-affiliate stockholders may sell freely after six months subject only to the current public information requirement. Affiliates may sell after six months subject to the Rule 144 volume, manner of sale (for equity securities), and current public information and notice requirements. Any substantial sales of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. 

We could issue additional common stock, which might dilute the book value of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors has authority, without action or vote of our shareholders, to issue all or a part of our authorized but unissued shares. Such stock issuances could be made at a price that reflects a discount or a premium from the then-current trading price of our common stock. In addition, in order to raise capital, we may need to issue securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for a significant amount of our common stock. These issuances would dilute the percentage ownership interest, which would have the effect of reducing your influence on matters on which our shareholders vote and might dilute the book value of our common stock. You may incur additional dilution if holders of stock options, whether currently outstanding or subsequently granted, exercise their options, or if warrant holders exercise their warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.

Our common stock could be further diluted as a result of the issuance of convertible securities, warrants or options.

In the past, we have issued convertible securities (such as convertible debentures and notes), warrants and options in order to raise money or as compensation for services and incentive compensation for our employees and directors. We have shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of certain of these securities and may increase the shares reserved for these purposes in the future. Our issuance of these convertible securities, options and warrants could affect the rights of our stockholders, could reduce the market price of our common stock or could result in adjustments to exercise prices of outstanding warrants (resulting in these securities becoming exercisable for, as the case may be, a greater number of shares of our common stock), or could obligate us to issue additional shares of common stock to certain of our stockholders.

We do not intend to pay dividends.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We may not have sufficient funds to legally pay dividends. Even if funds are legally available to pay dividends, we may nevertheless decide in our sole discretion not to pay dividends. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, and will depend upon, among other things, the results of our operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors our board of directors may consider relevant. There is no assurance that we will pay any dividends in the future, and, if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.

If we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, the price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

Our internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that could require correction or remediation, the disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.  We are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting.  Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely affect our public disclosures regarding our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.  In addition, management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors.  Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of management’s assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our executive offices are located at 600 S. Wagner Rd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103. The Company is currently leasing office space at this address on a month-to-month basis at a rate of $800 per month. In addition, the Company has entered into a separate annual lease agreement on the premises for wet lab space at a monthly rent of $1,050.

On June 30, 2020, the Company moved headquarters from Tulsa, Oklahoma to 333 Jackson Plaza, Ann Arbor, Michigan at which time the Company terminated the lease agreement in Tulsa. The Company continued to occupy the office space in Ann Arbor under the lease agreement that was executed on December 3, 2019. The Company signed a one-year lease in Ann Arbor, Michigan commencing January 1, 2020, with an annual rent obligation of $15,120 ($1,260 per month). The Company renewed the Ann Arbor lease for 2021 under the same terms.  On September 30, 2021, the Company received $45,000 to vacate the leased space and assign the lease to a third party, which is recorded as other income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. At which time the company relocated the executive offices to 600 S. Wagner Rd., Ann Arbor, MI. Rent expense for the office operating leases was $13,740 and $25,592 and for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding, nor is our property the subject of a pending legal proceeding, that is not in the ordinary course of business or otherwise material to the financial condition of our business. None of our directors, officers or affiliates are involved in a proceeding adverse to our business or have a material interest adverse to our business.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB market under the symbol “CRTG”. The Company upgraded the marketplace to OTCQB on October 29, 2020.

For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of common stock. These prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

The market price of our common stock, like that of other technology companies, is highly volatile and is subject to fluctuations in response to variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products, or other events or factors. Our stock price may also be affected by broader market trends unrelated to our performance.

Holders

As of March 21, 2022, we had approximately 4,800 active holders of our common stock. The number of active holders of record was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. Our transfer agent is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, One State Street Plaza, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004. 

Dividend Policy

We have not declared any dividends to date. We have no present intention of paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, as we intend to use earnings, if any, to generate growth. The payment of dividends, if any, in the future, rests within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend, among other things, upon our earnings, capital requirements and our financial condition, as well as other relevant factors. There are no restrictions in our Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws that restrict us from declaring dividends. 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The Company has two equity compensation plans, the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, referred to herein as the “2018 EIP” and the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, referred to herein as the “2021 EIP.”

The following table sets forth the information indicated with respect to our compensation plans under which our common stock is authorized for issuance The following table is as of March 21, 2022.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The Company issued an aggregate of 522,924 shares of the Company’s common stock on February 15, 2018. The Company had agreed to issue to certain consultants and service providers (collectively, “Recipients”) and the Recipients had agreed to accept shares of common stock in consideration for the satisfaction, in lieu of cash payment, of an aggregate of $71,880 owed by the Company to the Recipients. Among the Recipients were (i) Doug Freitag, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, who received 322,154 shares of common stock in satisfaction of $41,880 owed to him for services he provided to the Company; (ii) Concordia Financial Group, the Company’s financial consultant, who received 230,770 shares of common stock in satisfaction of $30,000 owed for services provided to the Company under the terms of the independent consulting agreement (the “Independent Consulting Agreement”). On July 2, 2018, August 6, 2018 and October 1, 2018 the Company issued an aggregate of 430,985 shares of the Company’s common stock to Concordia Financial Group in satisfaction of $22,046 owed for services provided under the Independent Consulting Agreement. On October 24, 2018, Matthews Kappers, an associate of Concordia Financial Group, was issued 63,930 shares of common stock in satisfaction of $2,960 owed to him for consulting services.

On December 27, 2019, the Company issued 123,330,807 shares of Common Stock of the Company upon the conversion of debt held by certain Legacy Holders, which Legacy Holders consists substantially of the Company’s Co-Chairmen, Victor Keen and Simon Calton. The total outstanding Legacy Debt converted was $2,711,359, which consisted of $2,017,435 in outstanding principal and $693,924 in accrued interest.

During the 2020 fiscal year, the Company received notice from the Diversified Alpha Fund of Navigator Global Fund Manager Platform SPC (DAF) to convert debt to common stock pursuant to the October 4, 2019 credit agreement. DAF provided notice on March 31, 2020 and October 30, 2020 converting a total of $550,000 of debt to 16,727,920 common stock shares.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the Company received notice from a consultant to exchange 4,500,000 options for 2,700,000 common shares of rule 144 common stock. These transactions were pursuant to the June 8, 2020 consent by the Board of Directors for a share exchange agreement with holders of 21,500,000 options awarded on August 7, 2019.  The agreement allows for holders to exchange their options for rule 144 common stock at an exchange rate of 0.6 shares per 1 option.

On March 2, 2021, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with the Investor pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a private placement (i) 23,500,000 Shares, (ii) Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 51,500,000 shares of its common stock, and (iii) the Warrants exercisable for a period of five-and one-half years subject to restrictions to purchase up to an aggregate of 82,500,000 shares of its common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $6,000,000. The combined purchase price for one share of common stock and associated Warrant is $0.08 and for one Pre-Funded Warrant and associated Warrant is $0.0799. The sale of the securities under the Purchase Agreement closed on March 5, 2021. In connection with this offering, we paid HCW a 8.0% cash fee of gross proceeds, 1% management fee and warrant coverage equal to 8% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock purchased in the offering at an exercise price equal to 125% of the offering price per share available over a 5-year term.

On April 7, 2021, the Company granted options (the “Options”) to purchase a total of 18,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0002 per share (the “Common Stock”) at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The Options are exercisable for a period of five (5) years from the date of issuance. Of the 18,000,000 total Options granted, (i) Options to purchase 2,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock were granted to Victor Keen, the Company’s co-chairman; (ii) Options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Simon Calton, the Company’s co-chairman (iii) Options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Ron Dombrowski, a Director of the Company’s Board of Directors; (iv) Options to purchase 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Michael Kraft, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; (v) Options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to Matthew Hoffman, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer; and (vi) Options to purchase an aggregate of 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to various employees and consultants of the Company. In connection with the issuance of the securities described in this Item 3.02, the Company relied upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions not involving a public offering.

On June 18, 2021, the Company also issued Matthew J. Kappers options to purchase 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0002 per share at an exercise price of $.1211 per share. The options vest equally, in monthly increments, over a six (6) month period beginning June 18, 2021.

On September 30, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the cancellation and reissuance of the following Options previously granted on April 7, 2021 to various members of management: (i) 6,000,000 Options of Matthew Kappers, (ii) 2,000,000 Options of Matthew L. Hoffman, (iii) 2,000,000 Options of Victor F. Keen, (iv) 2,000,000 Options of Simon Calton, (v) 1,000,000 Options of Ron Dombrowski, and (vi) 4,000,000 Options of Michael Kraft. In addition, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the cancellation and reissuance of an aggregate of 6,000,000 Options previously granted on April 7, 2021 to employees and consultants of the Company.

On September 30, 2021, the Company granted five-year Options to members of the Company’s management, employees and consultants, as incentive compensation. The Company granted the following Options: (i) 2,000,000 Options to Matthew Kappers, (ii) 1,000,000 Options to Matthew L. Hoffman, (iii) 3,000,000 Options to Victor F. Keen, (iv) 3,000,000 Options to Simon Calton, (v) 2,000,000 Options to Ron Dombrowski, and (vi) an aggregate of 2,500,000 Options to employees and consultants of the Company.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, Diversified Alpha Fund of Navigator Global Fund Manager Platform SPC (“DAF”) provided notice to convert $265,458 of debt at the stated conversion price of $0.0329 per share, resulting in an issuance of 8,068,628 common shares to DAF.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, a consultant and former employee of the Company exchanged an aggregate of 3,500,000 options for 2,100,000 shares of rule 144 common stock. These transactions were pursuant to the June 8, 2020 consent by the Board of Directors for a share exchange agreement with holders of 21,500,000 options awarded on August 7, 2019.  The agreement allows for holders to exchange their options for rule 144 common stock at an exchange rate of 0.6 shares per 1 option. Subsequent to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, a consultant of the Company exchanged an aggregate of 1,500,000 options for 900,000 shares of rule 144 common stock. As of March 21, 2022 a total of 9,500,000 options have been exchanged for 5,700,000 shares of rule 144 common stock under this agreement.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

Not applicable. 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report.

Plan of Operation

Background: 

On June 22, 2017, the Group filed an Amended Certificate of Incorporation (the “Amendment”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma, to (i) change its name from “3DIcon Corporation” to “The Coretec Group Inc.” and to (ii) effect a 1-for-300 reverse stock split. The Name Change and Reverse Split became effective with the State of Oklahoma on June 28, 2017 and with FINRA on June 29, 2017. 

The Group was incorporated on August 11, 1995, under the laws of the State of Oklahoma as First Keating Corporation. The articles of incorporation were amended August 1, 2003 to change the name to 3DIcon Corporation. During 2001, First Keating Corporation began to focus on the development of 360-degree holographic technology. On July 15, 2005, the Group entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement (“SRA”) with the University of Oklahoma (the “University” or “OU”), which expired on January 14, 2007, under which they conducted a research project entitled "Investigation of 3-Dimensional Display Technologies”. On February 23, 2007, they entered into an SRA with the University, which expired on March 31, 2010, under which they conducted a research project entitled "3-Dimensional Display Development". The development to date has resulted in multiple new technologies, two working laboratory prototypes (Lab Proto 1 and Lab Proto 2), and eight provisional patents; five of the eight provisional patents have been combined and converted to five utility patents. Under the SRA, the Group has obtained the exclusive worldwide marketing rights to these 3D display technologies. 

All descriptions of technology, business model, near term revenue opportunities, and recent developments required by this Item are attached hereto in Item I, Business Overview and are hereby incorporated by reference.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020

Revenue

We did not have revenues for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Research and Development Expenses

The research and development expenses were $469,996 for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $151,864 for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The approximate $318,000 increase was a result of approximately $234,000 increase in stock option expenses, approximately $56,000 increase in CHS materials for research activities, approximately $18,000 legal fees related to intellectual property and approximately $10,000 increase in consultant compensation cost in 2021.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses were $5,615,038 for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $1,029,136 for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The approximately $4,586,000 net increase was largely a result of the increase in stock option expense. Stock option expense included in the year ended December 31, 2021 was approximately $4,365,000 compared with the approximately $125,000 of option expense incurred for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Other significant increases during the year ended December 31, 2021 include approximately $145,000 in consulting costs for sales and marketing, approximately $106,000 in consulting costs for finance and executive management, approximately $42,000 in costs for marketing activities and press releases, approximately $29,000 in market research expense, and approximately $16,000 in accounting fees related to security registration filings.

These increased expenses were offset by reductions of approximately $16,000 for legal expenses and approximately $10,000 in rent expenses.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $229,525 for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $665,232 for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The decrease of approximately $436,000 was primarily a result of a reduction in beneficial conversion feature expense of approximately $460,000. This reduction in expense results from adoption of a recent accounting pronouncement, as described in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report. In addition, reductions of approximately $14,000 related to amortization of warrant debt costs and approximately $3,000 related to amortization of deferred costs were realized for DAF activities. These reductions were offset by an increase in approximately $41,000 of stated interest on the DAF loan.

Other Income

Other income was $45,620 for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $1,250 for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase was due to a transaction on September 30, 2021, where the Company received $45,000 to vacate leased office space and assign the lease to a third party.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management remains focused on controlling cash expenses. We recognize our responsibility for advancing our technology and plan our expenses accordingly. We intend to leverage stock-for-services wherever possible. The 2022 fiscal year operating budget consists of the following expenses:

As of December 31, 2021, we had cash of $4,053,327 and a positive net working capital of $3,879,722.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, we used $1,114,230 of cash for operating activities, a decrease of $238,672 or 18% compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.

The decrease in the use of cash for operating activities was a net result of the increase in the loss from operations of $4,423,957, the decrease in amortization of debt discount of $476,430, the increase in the options issued for services of $4,506,895, the increase in common stock issued for services of $261,246, the increase in the change in prepaid expenses of $137,614, the increase in the change in deposits of $17,974, and the increase in the change in accounts payable of $214,257. 

During the year ended December 31, 2021, there was $12,007 of cash used for investing activities from capitalized website costs.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, there was $5,157,345 of cash provided by financing activities, an increase of $3,840,373 or 292% compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.

The increase was a result of the March 2, 2021, private placement stock purchase agreement and net proceeds of $4,913,200. The private placement proceeds were offset by $20,796 increase in payments on notes payable and a $1,052,031 decrease in proceeds of debt and warrants issued.

Raising additional funds for future activities could be achieved through a potential reverse merger arrangement or an additional financing partnership. Our ability to fund the future operations of the Company is highly dependent on the underlying stock price of the Company.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our consolidated financial condition, revenues, and results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures. 

Significant Accounting Policies

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 and is hereby incorporated by reference

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See the Recent Accounting Pronouncements section of Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details of recent accounting pronouncements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

All financial information required by this Item is attached hereto at the end of this report beginning after page 49 and is hereby incorporated by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as we do not have sufficient resources in our accounting function, which restricts the Company’s ability to gather, analyze and properly review information related to financial reporting in a timely manner. In addition, due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, management will engage financial consultants and perform additional analysis and other procedures to help address this material weakness. Until remediation actions are fully implemented and the operational effectiveness of related internal controls are validated through testing, the material weaknesses described above will continue to exist.  

Notwithstanding the assessment that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective and that there is a material weakness as identified herein, we believe that our consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report fairly present our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods covered thereby in all material respects.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the members of our Board of Directors and our executive officers and the positions held by each. There are no family relationships among any of our Directors and Executive Officers.

Victor Keen – Director, Co-Chairman

Mr. Keen is a significant shareholder in The Coretec Group. He has been a member of the Board since November 2007, and served as CEO from 2013 to 2016. Mr. Keen is a graduate of Harvard Law School and Trinity College. He is currently of-counsel at Duane Morris LLP, an international law firm with over 20 offices worldwide, where until 2011 he was the Chair of its Tax Practice Group. Mr. Keen has been an active investor in a number of private companies, both start-up and later stage, including Lending Tree; Circle Lending, Inc., now part of Richard Branson’s Virgin Group; Bantam Pharmaceutical LLC, a biotechnology company, co-founded in 2015 by Mr. Keen, focusing on the discovery and development of innovative cancer therapies; and Retirement Clearinghouse LLC, a company involved in the matching of individual IRA/pension accounts with appropriate managers. In addition, he is an investor and former board member in publicly traded Research Frontiers, Inc., inventor, and licensor of “smart glass” technology. Mr. Keen also owns and co-manages a four-state commercial real estate portfolio.

Simon Calton – Director, Co-Chairman

Simon Calton has a wealth of experience in financing and company structuring. Since 2008, Mr. Calton has structured both regulated and private placement Products in the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, United States, and the United Kingdom. In 2012, he co-founded Carlton James Group, which specializes in funding and developing companies in a multitude of industries across the globe.

In addition, Mr. Calton sits on the board of several different companies across a range of industries including Technology & Fintech, Arts, Media, Real Estate, Development, wealth management companies, and consultancy firms, whilst also writing and providing commentary for publication globally including South China Morning Post, Bloomberg, Forbes, and Reuters.

Ron Dombrowski – Director

Ron Dombrowski has served as a member of The Coretec Group’s Board of Directors since August 2015. Mr. Dombrowski has over 25 years of executive global sales and operations experience, growing and scaling both startups and Fortune 500 technology companies. He is a graduate of the Southern Illinois University with degrees in Electrical Engineering and Management.

Douglas W. Freitag – Director

Douglas W. Freitag brings 38 years of expertise in developing, commercializing, and financing new technologies. He formed Bayside Materials Technology (BMT) in 1993 after a successful career in various management and engineering roles while employed by Lockheed Martin, Honeywell, and Ford Motor Company. BMT was formed to support academia, investors and industry with the process of identifying, creating and commercializing new technologies where the Federal Government plays a role, either as an investor, regulator or user. BMT routinely works with all aspects of the Federal Government in areas of a policy, regulatory, procurement, or R&D funding nature. Mr. Freitag has a technical background with a B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. He holds a Secret level DOD clearance.

Matthew Kappers – Chief Executive Officer and Director

Prior to joining as CEO, Mr. Kappers was a consultant for The Coretec Group since 2018. Mr. Kappers has extensive transactional and operational experience working with both startups and publicly traded companies. Matthew also serves as a Managing Director at Concordia Financial Group, an investment bank and consulting firm since 2011. He has experience in operations, mergers and acquisitions, and strategic planning. Mr. Kappers earned a B.A. degree from Vanderbilt University and a M.B.A. degree from Miami University.

Matthew Hoffman – Chief Financial Officer

As CFO, Matt manages organizational growth, financial reporting, modeling, and system development. Matt has worked with early-stage, high growth businesses for the past 15 years in financial and operational capacities.

Matt’s start-up experiences produced 30-40% annual growth through acquisition, first as the Controller at Adaptive Materials (AMI), a portable power development and manufacturing company, acquired by Ultra Electronics. Then as CFO of MI Bioresearch (MI Bio), a CRO for pre-clinical drug discovery, who was acquired by Covance (LabCorp). Prior to working for startups, Matt began his professional career in public accounting at Weidmayer, Schneider, Raham & Bennett. Matt holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Western Michigan University, a license as a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Michigan, and a Secret level (inactive) DoD clearance.

Michael A. Kraft – President

Michael has extensive experience in applied materials product development and is responsible for customer acquisition and establishing strategic suppliers to worldwide markets and partners. His focus is to identify critical market requirements, lead product development, and grow market share through strategic partnerships. Michael has a BSEE/Systems Science degree from Michigan State University and a Masters in Management from Penn State University.

Audit Committee

On February 25, 2008, the Board of Directors created an Audit Committee comprised of Mr. Victor Keen. We intend to continue to evaluate the composition of our Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee

On February 25, 2008, the Board of Directors created a Compensation Committee comprised of Mr. Victor Keen. We intend to continue to evaluate the composition of our Compensation Committee.

Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee

On February 25, 2008, the Board of Directors created Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee comprising of Mr. Victor Keen. We intend to continue to evaluate the composition of our Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee.

Director or Officer Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our directors and executive officers were not involved in any legal proceedings as described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K in the past ten years. 

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Although we have not adopted a formal policy on whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions should be separate or combined, in the past we determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to keep these two roles separate.

Our Board of Directors receives and reviews periodic reports from management, auditors, legal counsel, and others, as considered appropriate regarding our Company's assessment of risks. Our Board of Directors focuses on the most significant risks facing our Company and our Company's general risk management strategy and ensures that risks undertaken by us are consistent with the Board's appetite for risk. While the Board oversees our Company's risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing our Company and that our board leadership structure and role in risk oversight is effective. 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To our knowledge, our directors and executive officers have not been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for Officers, Directors and Employees that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees.

Employment Agreements

On June 21, 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Matthew J. Kappers as Chief Executive Officer. Kappers will operate in the CEO role as an independent contractor for the period of June 15, 2021 through December 15, 2021. Kappers will be compensated at a monthly rate of $12,500 and received an option grant to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock. The options were fully vested pursuant to the Board of Directors consent, effective September 30, 2021. Since December 2021, the Company and Kappers have been operating under the agreement on a month to month basis. The Company recognized $87,500 of consultant expense to Kappers as CEO and $23,884 for consulting related to markets and financing for the year ended December 31, 2021.

The Company entered into a consulting agreement dated March 20, 2017 with Michael A. Kraft, who became the Company’s CEO. Under the terms of the agreement the Company agreed to compensate Kraft, $1,500 per day for his commitment to allocate seven days a month (subsequently amended to ten day a month) to the Company and a $25,000 bonus payable in the Company’s restricted stock upon occurrence of certain events. Kraft was issued ten million options during August 2019 for (1) as compensation for the $25,000 bonus in the consulting agreement, (2) approximately $91,000 as payment for unpaid consulting fees and, (3) approximately $294,000 as additional compensation for his consulting services. Kraft was owed $51,720 and $95,966 in unpaid consulting fees and out of pocket expenses, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively. All past accounts payable amounts were paid in full to Kraft in 2021. On November 1, 2021 Kraft’s agreement was adjusted to an hourly rate of $187 per hour. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $181,874 and $180,000 of expense respectively, under the terms of the agreement.

The Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Matthew Hoffman, doing business as Integrate Growth, LLC, effective May 18, 2020 and expiring May 19, 2021.  Under the terms of the agreement, Hoffman had the position of Director of Finance. On June 30, 2020 Ron Robinson, Chief Financial Officer and Judith Keating, Corporate Secretary both retired from the Company. As part of the management transition plan Hoffman was elevated to Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary on June 30, 2020. On June 23, 2021, the Company renewed the CFO and Corporate Secretary contract with Matthew L. Hoffman under similar terms of the initial contract. The new agreement expires on May 31, 2022. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $103,950 and $42,000 of expense respectively, under the terms of the agreement.

Director Compensation

Our directors have not received monetary compensation for their service on the Board of Directors. Directors may receive compensation for their services and reimbursement for their expenses as shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board.

Except as below, none of the following parties has, since our date of incorporation, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction with us or in any presently proposed transaction that has or will materially affect us:

Risk Management

The Company does not believe risks arising from its compensation policies and practices for its employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Director Independence

Because the Company’s Common Stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, the Company has used the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

Based on this review of the Company’s Board of Directors, only Ronald Dombrowski and Douglas Freitag of the members are considered to be independent under the listing standards of the Rules of NASDAQ set forth in the NASDAQ Manual. 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables set forth all compensation earned in respect of our executive officers and directors for our last three completed fiscal years.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLES

The following information is furnished for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 for our executive officers.

*Matthew Kappers was appointed as CEO in June of 2021

**Matthew Hoffman was appointed CFO in June of 2020

***Michael Kraft served as CEO from March 2017 through June 2021

****Ron Robinson resigned as CFO in June of 2020 

The following information is furnished for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 for our directors.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 

The following table sets forth with respect to grants of options to purchase our common stock to the executive officers as of December 31, 2021:

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT 

The following table provides information about shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 21, 2022 by:

(1) Percentage ownership is determined based on shares owned together with securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of the date of this report, for each stockholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Furthermore, the percentages set forth in this column are based on the 255,615,791 issued and outstanding shares of common stock on March 21, 2022. 

(2) Represents 94,528,679 shares owned by Mr. Keen and (i) 3,561,299 shares, representing his pecuniary interest in shares held by Carlton James Ltd., (ii) 5,001,150 shares issuable upon exercise of the options held by Mr. Keen, and (iii) 88,333 shares issuable upon the conversion of 265,000 shares of Series A preferred stock held by Mr. Keen. Victor Keen is a Co-Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors.

(3) Represents 5,771,131 shares owned by Mr. Calton and (i) 9,936,703 shares, representing his pecuniary interest in shares held by Carlton James Ltd. Simon Calton is the Co-Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and (ii) 5,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the options held by Mr. Calton.

(4) Represents 3,644,920 shares owned by Mr. Dombrowski and 3,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the options held by Mr. Dombrowski. Ronald Dombrowski is a Director on the Company’s Board of Directors.

(5) Represents 561,922 shares owned by Mr. Freitag and 2,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the options held by Mr. Freitag. Douglas Freitag is a Director on the Company’s Board of Directors.

(6) Represents 1,205,117 shares owned by Mr. Kappers and 9,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the options held by Mr. Kappers. Matthew Kappers is the Company’s CEO and Director on the Company’s Board of Directors.

(7) Represents 4,000,000 shares issuable upon exercise of vested options held by Mr. Hoffman but excludes 250,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that do not vest within 60 days. Matthew Hoffman is the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

(8) Represents 14,208,160 shares issuable upon exercise of vested options held by Mr. Kraft. Michael A. Kraft is the Company’s President.

(9) Shares held by Carlton James Ltd., are controlled by Simon Calton, the Co-Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. 

(10) Represents XX,XXX,XXX shares owned by Diversified Alpha Fund (DAF) and XX,XXX,XXX shares issuable upon conversions, which conversions are subject to a 9.99% ownership limitation, of outstanding balances under a Credit Agreement and related Promissory Note entered into by the Company and DAF. DAF is managed and controlled by Mollitium Investment Management.

(11) The shares are directly held by Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Master Fund”), and may be deemed to be indirectly beneficially owned by: (i) Armistice Capital, LLC (“Armistice Capital”), as the investment manager of the Master Fund; and (ii) Steven Boyd, as the Managing Member of Armistice Capital. The number of shares excludes 134,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants and the warrants, both of which are subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations.  Armistice Capital and Steven Boyd disclaim beneficial ownership of the securities except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests therein. The business address for the Master Fund is c/o Armistice Capital, LLC, 510 Madison Avenue 7th Floor, New York 10022.

(12) Calculated on the basis of 345,000 issued and outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as of March 21, 2022.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Related Party Transactions

On June 21, 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Matthew J. Kappers as Chief Executive Officer. Kappers will operate in the CEO role as an independent contractor for the period of June 15, 2021 through December 15, 2021. Kappers will be compensated at a monthly rate of $12,500 and received an option grant to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock. The options were fully vested pursuant to the Board of Directors consent, effective September 30, 2021. Since December 2021, the Company and Kappers have been operating under the agreement on a month to month basis. The Company recognized $87,500 of consultant expense to Kappers as CEO and $23,884 for consulting related to markets and financing for the year ended December 31, 2021.

The Company entered into a consulting agreement dated March 20, 2017 with Michael A. Kraft, who became the Company’s CEO. Under the terms of the agreement the Company agreed to compensate Kraft, $1,500 per day for his commitment to allocate seven days a month (subsequently amended to ten day a month) to the Company and a $25,000 bonus payable in the Company’s restricted stock upon occurrence of certain events. Kraft was issued ten million options during August 2019 for (1) as compensation for the $25,000 bonus in the consulting agreement, (2) approximately $91,000 as payment for unpaid consulting fees and, (3) approximately $294,000 as additional compensation for his consulting services. Kraft was owed $51,720 and $95,966 in unpaid consulting fees and out of pocket expenses, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 respectively. All past accounts payable amounts were paid in full to Kraft in 2021. On November 1, 2021 Kraft’s agreement was adjusted to an hourly rate of $187 per hour. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $181,874 and $180,000 of expense respectively, under the terms of the agreement.

The Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with Matthew Hoffman, doing business as Integrate Growth, LLC, effective May 18, 2020 and expiring May 19, 2021.  Under the terms of the agreement, Hoffman had the position of Director of Finance. On June 30, 2020 Ron Robinson, Chief Financial Officer and Judith Keating, Corporate Secretary both retired from the Company. As part of the management transition plan Hoffman was elevated to Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary on June 30, 2020. On June 23, 2021, the Company renewed the CFO and Corporate Secretary contract with Matthew L. Hoffman under similar terms of the initial contract. The new agreement expires on May 31, 2022. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized $103,950 and $43,000 of expense respectively, under the terms of the agreement.

Director Independence

As discussed above, none of the members are considered to be independent under the listing standards of the Rules of NASDAQ set forth in the NASDAQ Manual

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in the quarterly reports and other fees that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $76,000 and $63,000, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed by our principal accountant for assurance and advisory services that were related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $0 and $0, respectively.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal years December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $2,850 and $0, respectively.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $0 and $0, respectively.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent auditors and management are required to periodically report to our Board of Directors regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Board of Directors may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

* Filed herewith

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not applicable

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

The Coretec Group, Inc.

December 31, 2021 and 2020

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of

The Coretec Group Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Coretec Group, Inc. and its subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting of embedded conversion features of its convertible debt, effective January 1, 2021, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity (ASU 2020-06), using the modified retrospective approach.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements, and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Patent Impairment Assessment

As described further in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company reviews patents for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. In performing the review for impairment, management makes significant estimates and assumptions related to the use of the patents and forecasts of future undiscounted cash flows. The net balance of the patents was approximately $979,000 as of December 31, 2021.

Given the significant assumptions made by management regarding the Company's discretionary strategic decisions to use the patent technology in the future and the uncertainty of the outcome of the use of the technology, performing audit procedures required a high degree of auditor judgment and was impacted by the nature of audit evidence regarding the matter.

Our audit procedures related to the patent impairment assessment included the following, among others:

Going Concern Assessment

As noted in the consolidated financial statements, the Company has no revenues and realized net losses each year from inception through December 31, 2021. The Company believes that the working capital as of December 31, 2021, is sufficient to fund development of its planned products and pay operating expenses for at least one year following the issuance of these consolidated financial statements, which alleviated any substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. In making this determination, management prepared a short-term cash flow projection. Management used significant assumptions in preparing the short-term cash flow projection, which included expected operating costs and financing obligations.

The principal considerations for our determination that the evaluation of management's going concern analysis was a critical audit matter are the significant judgment and subjectivity from management when evaluating the uncertainty related to the Company's future cash flow projection and a high degree of auditor judgment in evaluating management's forecasts for at least the next 12 months.

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of management's forecasted expenditures and going concern analysis included the following, among others:

/s/ HOGANTAYLOR LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.

Tulsa, Oklahoma

March 21, 2022

THE CORETEC GROUP INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2021 and 2020

See notes to consolidated financial statements

THE CORETEC GROUP INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 and 2020

THE CORETEC GROUP INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 and 2020

THE CORETEC GROUP INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 and 2020