Correlate Energy Corp. - Quarter Report: 2009 May (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: May 31, 2009
Or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: to
Commission File Number: 0-30746
TBX RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | 75-2592165 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
3030 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1320 | 75234 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(972) 234-2610
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. o Yes þ
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
o Large accelerated filer | o Accelerated filer | o Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
þ Smaller Reporting Company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
As of February 10, 2010, there
were 4,027,442 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
May 31, 2009 | November 30, | |||||||
(Unaudited) | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 2,823 | $ | 2,506 | ||||
Oil and gas revenue receivable |
200,656 | 175,812 | ||||||
Accounts receivable from affiliate |
| 21,824 | ||||||
Prepaid expense |
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Inventory |
5,300 | | ||||||
Total current assets |
218,779 | 210,142 | ||||||
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method), net |
53,468 | 57,619 | ||||||
Other |
6,211 | 6,211 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 278,458 | $ | 273,972 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
||||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 129,958 | $ | 90,789 | ||||
Accounts payable to and advances from affiliate |
351,188 | 173,786 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
5,300 | | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
486,446 | 264,575 | ||||||
Long-term Liabilities |
||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
21,492 | 20,981 | ||||||
Non-controlling Interest in Consolidated Subsidiary |
72,000 | 72,000 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8) |
||||||||
Stockholders Deficit |
||||||||
Preferred stock- $.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000;
no shares outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock- $.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; 4,027,442 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2009, 4,027,442 shares issued and outstanding at November 30, 2008 |
40,274 | 40,274 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
10,929,940 | 10,929,440 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(11,271,694 | ) | (11,053,298 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders deficit |
(301,480 | ) | (83,584 | ) | ||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit |
$ | 278,458 | $ | 273,972 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-1
Table of Contents
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
May 31, 2009 | May 31, 2008 | May 31, 2009 | May 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas sales |
$ | 10,320 | $ | 66,304 | $ | 24,845 | $ | 157,281 | ||||||||
Total revenues |
10,320 | 66,304 | 24,845 | 157,281 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Lease operating and taxes |
8,905 | 45,935 | 20,665 | 201,170 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
91,271 | 87,797 | 219,601 | 222,107 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, amortization
and accretion |
2,268 | 7,620 | 4,662 | 21,680 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
102,444 | 141,352 | 244,928 | 444,957 | ||||||||||||
Operating Loss |
(92,124 | ) | (75,048 | ) | (220,083 | ) | (287,676 | ) | ||||||||
Other Income (Expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of oil and gas properties |
1,687 | 1,092,040 | 1,687 | 1,092,040 | ||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes |
(90,437 | ) | 1,016,992 | (218,396 | ) | 804,364 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | (90,437 | ) | $ | 1,016,992 | $ | (218,396 | ) | $ | 804,364 | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share, Basic |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.20 | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share, Diluted |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.25 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.20 | |||||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
4,027,442 | 4,027,442 | 4,027,442 | 4,018,016 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
4,027,442 | 4,118,746 | 4,027,442 | 4,123,070 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
F-2
Table of Contents
TBX RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
May 31, 2009 | May 31, 2008 | |||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (218,396 | ) | $ | 804,364 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used for
operating activities: |
||||||||
Gain on sale of oil and gas properties |
(1,687 | ) | (1,092,040 | ) | ||||
Lease operating and taxes |
| 174,120 | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion |
4,662 | 21,680 | ||||||
Stock based compensation |
500 | 80,500 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities other than
accounts payable to and advances from affiliate: |
||||||||
Decrease (increase) in: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable from affiliate |
21,824 | | ||||||
Oil and gas revenue receivable |
(24,844 | ) | 8,884 | |||||
Inventory |
(5,300 | ) | (4,165 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
39,169 | (7,759 | ) | |||||
Asset retirement obligations current portion |
| (29,964 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
5,300 | 4,165 | ||||||
Net cash used for operating activities |
(178,772 | ) | (40,215 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Development of oil and gas properties |
| (28,461 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties |
1,687 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
1,687 | (28,461 | ) | |||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Advances from affiliate net |
177,402 | 42,027 | ||||||
Exercise of common stock options |
| 3,750 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
177,402 | 45,777 | ||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash |
317 | (22,899 | ) | |||||
Cash at beginning of period |
2,506 | 23,821 | ||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 2,823 | $ | 922 | ||||
Supplemental Non-Cash Activity: |
||||||||
Sale of oil and gas properties |
$ | | $ | 106,430 | ||||
Payables to and advances from affiliate |
$ | | $ | (1,052,547 | ) | |||
Asset retirement obligations settled |
$ | | $ | (145,923 | ) | |||
Write-off of fully depreciated property and equipment in May 2009. |
$ | 229,074 | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
TBX RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
May 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company,
without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted. However, in the opinion
of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present
fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been made.
The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or of results to be
expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements of the Company for the year ended November 30, 2008 (including the notes
thereto) set forth in Form 10-K.
2. BUSINESS ACTIVITIES:
TBX Resources, Inc., a Texas corporation (TBX or the Company), was organized on March 24, 1995.
Currently, the Companys primary focus is to secure additional capital through business alliances
with third parties or other debt/equity financing arrangements to acquire producing oil and gas
leases and wells, acquire additional oil and gas prospect leases and to acquire an exploration
company that can also act as an operator of our wells.
The Companys principal historical business activity has been acquiring and developing producing
oil and gas properties. However, during fiscal year 2004, the Company began providing contract
services to an affiliate, Gulftex Operating, Inc. The services continued to August 31, 2006 when
the agreement was terminated by mutual agreement. In addition, the Company has sponsored and/or
managed joint venture development partnerships for the purpose of developing oil and gas properties
for profit.
The Company currently has an interest in wells located in Denton and Wise Counties, Texas.
Effective March 31, 2009 the Company sold its minor interest in three Oklahoma wells. Effective
April 1, 2008, the Company sold its East Texas oil and gas properties.
3. GOING CONCERN:
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which contemplates the
realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.
However, the company has negative stockholders equity and working capital. In addition, the
Company sold its primary source of revenue (East Texas properties) effective April 1, 2008. These
factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Revenue Recognition
For direct oil and gas operations, the revenue is recorded when production is sold. The
Company accrues revenue for oil and gas production sold but not paid.
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008
include the accounts of TBX Resources, Inc., and the Grasslands I, L.P. a limited partnership for
which TBX serves as the sole general partner. The accounts of Johnson No. A1, Johnson No. A2,
Hagansport Unit I and Unit II (sold to its affiliate Gulftex Operating effective April 1, 2008)
joint ventures, in which TBX owns interests, are consolidated on a proportionate basis, in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-1 Investor Balance Sheet And Income
Statement Display Under The Equity Method For Investments In Certain Partnerships And Other
Ventures. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
F-4
Table of Contents
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company received net advances from Gulftex totaling $177,402 during the six months ended
May 31, 2009 and $42,027 during the six months ended May 31, 2008.
Receivables
Receivables consist of accrued oil and gas receivables due from either purchasers of oil and gas or
operators in oil and natural gas wells for which the Company owns an interest. Oil and natural gas
sales are generally unsecured and such amounts are generally due within 30 days after the month of
sale. The manager for the Wise and Denton Counties, Texas is Earthwise Energy, Inc. which has not
paid the Company for its share of the oil and gas production since March of 2008. Accordingly, the
Company is accruing the revenue and expenses associated with the wells in Wise and Denton Counties
(see Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies).
Inventory
Inventory consists of crude oil held in storage tanks. Inventory is stated at market based on
anticipated selling prices.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at the Companys cost and are depreciated on a straight-line
basis over five to seven years. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred, while
major improvements are capitalized.
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas exploration
and development expenditures. Under this method, costs of successful exploratory wells and all
development wells are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved
reserves are expensed.
Significant costs associated with the acquisition of oil and gas properties are capitalized.
Upon sale or abandonment of units of property or the disposition of miscellaneous equipment, the
cost is removed from the asset account, the related reserves relieved of the accumulated
depreciation or depletion and the gain or abandonment loss is credited to or charged against
operations. Both proved and unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are
periodically assessed for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the time of impairment.
Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties, after considering estimated dismantlement
and abandonment costs and estimated salvage values are depreciated and depleted by the
unit-of-production method. Support equipment and other property and equipment are depreciated over
their estimated useful lives.
Oil and gas properties at May 31, 2009 consist of the following:
Proved oil and gas properties |
$ | 518,538 | ||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
(465,070 | ) | ||
$ | 53,468 | |||
Long-lived Assets
In accordance with SFAS No., 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS 144), the Company reviews its long-lived assets to be held and used, including
proved oil and gas properties accounted for under the successful efforts method of accounting,
whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is indicated if the sum of the expected future cash flows is less
than the carrying amount of the assets. In this circumstance, the Company recognizes an impairment
loss for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of
the asset.
The Company provides for depreciation, depletion and amortization of its investment in
producing oil and gas properties on the unit-of-production method, based upon independent reserve
engineers estimates of recoverable oil and gas reserves from the property.
F-5
Table of Contents
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS 143). SFAS 143 requires that the fair value
of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (ARO) be recognized in the period in which it
is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. Under the provisions of SFAS 143,
asset retirement obligations are capitalized as part of the carrying value of the long-lived asset.
SFAS 143 also requires the write down of capitalized ARO assets if they are impaired.
The following table describes changes to the asset retirement liability for the six months ended
May 31, 2009.
ARO at November 30, 2008 |
$ | 20,981 | ||
Accretion expense |
511 | |||
Liabilities incurred |
| |||
Liabilities settled |
| |||
Changes in estimates |
| |||
ARO at May 31, 2009 |
$ | 21,492 | ||
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized
in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Income tax expense is the tax payable
for the year plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
The Company computes earnings per share using Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net
income or loss by the average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per
common share is calculated by adjusting outstanding shares, assuming conversion of all potentially
dilutive stock options. The computation of diluted EPS does not assume conversion, exercise, or
contingent issuance of shares that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per common share.
Antidilution results from an increase in earnings per share or reduction in loss per share from the
inclusion of potentially dilutive shares in EPS calculations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant estimates include: estimates of proved reserves as key components of the Companys
depletion rate for oil properties; accruals of operating costs; estimates of production revenues;
and calculating asset retirement obligations. Because there are numerous uncertainties inherent in
the estimation process, actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
The Company adopted fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities that have
been evaluated at least annually. The standard defines fair value as the price at which an asset
could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liabilitys
fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor,
not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Management has
determined that it will not, at this time, adopt fair value accounting for nonfinancial assets or
liabilities currently recorded in the consolidated financial statements, which includes property
and equipment, investments carried at cost, deposits and other assets. Impairment analyses will be
made of all assets using fair value measurements.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based upon the level of judgment
associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by
generally accepted accounting principles and
F-6
Table of Contents
directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of
these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
Level 1 | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Plan has the ability to access. | |
Level 2 | Inputs to the valuation methodology include: |
| quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; | ||
| quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; | ||
| inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; | ||
| inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. | ||
Level 3 | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
During the six months ended May 31, 2009 there were several new accounting pronouncements issued by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) the most recent of which was SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by the
Company. Management does not believe the adoption of any of these accounting pronouncements has had
or will have a material impact on the Companys financial position or operating results. The
Company will monitor these emerging issues to assess any potential future impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
The Company conducts substantial transactions with Gulftex. These related party transactions have a
significant impact on the financial condition and operations of the Company. If these transactions
were conducted with third parties, the financial condition and operations of the Company could be
materially different from reported results.
a. | The former operator of the East Texas oil and gas leases, Gulftex is an affiliate of TBX. Mr. Burroughs is a 50% stockholder and president of the Company. TBX sold its interest in East Texas properties to Gulftex on April 1, 2008; accordingly, there are no fees associated with operating these wells for the six months ended May 31, 2009. Fees paid Gulftex for operating these wells for the six months ended May 31, 2008 are $3,200. | ||
b. | During the six months ended May 31, 2009, the Company received net advances from Gulftex totaling $177,402. The balance due Gulftex as of May 31, 2009 is $351,188. | ||
c. | Effective June 1, 2007, the Company is charging Gulftex rent for a portion of the Companys office space plus administrative expenses paid by the Company that relates to Gulftexs operations. The Company billed Gulftex $48,607 for the six months ended May 31, 2009. | ||
d. | On June 4, 2008, the Company executed a sales agreement (effective April 1, 2008) with Gulftex. Under the agreement, the Company transferred all of its East Texas oil and gas properties with a net book value of $106,430 to Gulftex. In consideration for the transfer of the properties, Gulftex forgave the Companys trade payables and advances totaling $1,052,547. In addition, Gulftex is assumed the Companys asset retirement obligations with a book value of $145,923. The Company recorded a gain of $1,092,040 on the sale. Gulftex did not charge interest for its advances to the Company. The amount of interest that could have been charged is immaterial. |
F-7
Table of Contents
7. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company executed an amended Employment Agreement effective August 4, 2005 with our
president Mr. Tim Burroughs for three years. Among other items, the agreement provides that Mr.
Burroughs has the contractual right to require TBX to issue, upon his request, up to 250,000 common
share options subject to certain conditions. The conditions are that the options will not be issued
unless Mr. Burroughs makes a demand for their issuance and the number of shares so demanded have
vested (the agreement provides that 50,000 potential options vest at the beginning of each
employment year for the five year term of the agreement and are cumulative.) The amendment also
changed how the options are to be priced. The options are to be priced at a maximum exercise price
of one-half the bid price for TBX common stock as of August 4, 2005 or $0.70 per share (one-half
$1.40 the closing bid price on August 4, 2005.) In the event the closing bid price of TBXs common
stock is below $0.70 on the date of a call by Mr. Burroughs, the exercise price would be reduced to
the lower actual bid price. Mr. Burroughs Employment Agreement was further amended in April 2007.
In exchange for TBX dropping the three year service requirement, Mr. Burroughs agreed to forgo his
eligibility to call for stock options for fiscal years 2005 and 2006. Mr. Burroughs did not call
any of his potential stock options as of May 31, 2009. In accordance with the terms of April l,
2007 Amended Employment Agreement, no compensation expense is recognized as of May 31, 2009 related
to Mr. Burroughs potential common stock options.
The Company executed an amended Employment Agreement effective April 1, 2006 with our Vice
President of Investor Relations, Dick ODonnell, having a term of one year, which automatically
renews unless otherwise terminated as provided in said agreement. Under the terms of the agreement
the Company agreed to issue Mr. ODonnell options to acquire 25,000 shares of common stock per
quarter beginning April 1, 2006 for a period of up to three years at an exercise price of $0.15 per
share. The option exercise period is one year from its date. The Company recorded stock based
compensation expense in the current quarter totaling $250 with a corresponding credit to paid-in
capital.
A summary of the status of the Companys equity awards as of May 31, 2009 and the changes during
the six month period then ended is presented below:
Weighted-Average | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding December 1, 2008 |
100,000 | $ | 0.15 | |||||
Granted |
50,000 | $ | 0.15 | |||||
Exercised |
| $ | 0.15 | |||||
Forfeited |
(50,000 | ) | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Outstanding May 31, 2009 |
100,000 | $ | 0.15 | |||||
Options exercisable at May 31, 2009 |
100,000 | $ | 0.15 | |||||
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during this quarter |
$ | 250 | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during this year to date |
$ | 500 | ||||||
The weighted average fair value at date of grant for options during the six months ended May
31, 2009 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following
assumptions:
Average expected life in years |
1 | |||
Average interest rate |
4.00 | % | ||
Average volatility |
169.86 | % | ||
Dividend yield |
0 | % |
A summary of the status of the Companys vested and nonvested shares at May 31, 2008 and the
weighted average grant date fair value is presented below:
F-8
Table of Contents
Weighted Average | Weighted Average | |||||||||||
Grant Date | Grant Date | |||||||||||
Shares | Fair Value per Share | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Vested |
100,000 | $ | .2250 | $ | 22,500 | |||||||
Nonvested |
| | | |||||||||
Total |
100,000 | $ | .2250 | $ | 22,500 | |||||||
As of May 31, 2009, the Company has no unrecognized compensation expense.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
The Company is currently obligated for $125,545 under an operating lease agreement for rent of
its office space in Dallas, Texas. The term of the lease is from February 1, 2004 through February
28, 2011. The average monthly base lease payment over the remaining term of the lease is
approximately $5,231.Rent expense for the six months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 is $35,697 and
$35,488, respectively.
On May 28, 2009 the Company, along with Grasslands I, L.P., intervened as third party plaintiffs in
a lawsuit originally captioned as Clay Bain, et. al. v. Earthwise Energy, Inc. (EEI) which was
filed in April 2009 in the 14th Judicial District, Dallas County Texas, Cause No.
095253. Our petition requests that we be given certain injunctive relief and be awarded
unspecified damages for certain alleged causes of action including, but not limited to, fraud,
conversion and violation of fiduciary duty against defendant Earthwise Energy, Inc. but also as
against two individuals, Jeffery C. Reynolds and Steven C. Howard who were added to the lawsuit as
third party defendants. Mr. Reynolds is a former member of our Board of Directors who resigned in
July 2008. Included in the claim for damages is an oil and gas accounts receivable totaling
$129,120 as of May 31, 2009. Pursuant to Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
5, Loss Contingencies, we have assessed the likelihood of prevailing in this lawsuit and thus
collecting these accounts receivable as reasonably possible. Accordingly, as provided by this
professional standard, a loss contingency related to the non-collection of these accounts
receivable has not been provided for in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Trio Operating, Inc. is the bonded operator for the Companys Denton and Wise County, Texas wells
and is responsible for compliance with the laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment. While it is not possible to quantify with certainty the potential impact of actions
regarding environmental matters, particularly any future remediation and other compliance efforts,
in the opinion of management, compliance with the present environmental protection laws will not
have a material adverse affect on the financial condition, competitive position or capital
expenditures of TBX Resources. However, the Companys cost to comply with increasingly stringent
environmental regulations may have an adverse effect on the Companys future earnings.
9. SALE OF OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES:
The Company sold its working interest in oil and gas leases located in Ellis County, Oklahoma
effective March 31, 2009 for $1,687 and wrote off the fully depleted property values totaling
$229,074.
On June 4, 2008, we executed a sales agreement (effective April 1, 2008) with Gulftex. Under the
agreement, we transferred all of our East Texas oil and gas properties with a net book value of
$106,431 to Gulftex. In consideration for the transfer of the properties, Gulftex forgave our trade
payables and advances totaling $1,052,547. In addition, Gulftex is assuming our asset retirement
obligations with a book value of $145,923. We recorded a gain of $1,092,040 on the sale.
10. INCOME TAXES:
The Company computes income taxes using the asset and liability approach as defined in SFAS No.
109. The Company currently has no issue that creates timing differences that would mandate deferred
tax expense. Due to the uncertainty as to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, an
evaluation allowance has been made to the extent of any tax benefit that net operating losses may
generate. No provision for income taxes has been recorded for the three and six months ended May
31, 2009 and 2008 due to the Companys net operating loss in 2009 and the available tax loss
carryforward in 2008.
F-9
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Statements in this report which are not purely historical facts, including statements
regarding the Companys anticipations, beliefs, expectations, hopes, intentions or strategies for
the future, may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
Act of 1934, as amended. All forward-looking statements in this report are based upon information
available to us on the date of the report. Any forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from events or results
described in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
GENERAL: The following is information concerning our oil and gas wells, our productive wells
and acreage and undeveloped acreage. We have wells in Denton and Wise Counties in Texas. We also
had several wells and acreage in the Camargo NW and Harmon SE fields located in Oklahoma which were
sold effective March 31, 2009.
Effective April 1, 2008, we sold our East Texas properties to Gulftex Operating, Inc. (a
company in which Mr. Burroughs is a 50% shareholder) in exchange for our payables and advances owed
to Gulftex. As additional consideration, Gulftex assumed our asset retirement obligations.
PROPERTIES
The following is a breakdown of our properties by field as of May 31, 2009:
Gross | Net | |||||||
Producing | Producing | |||||||
Name of Field or Well | Well Count | Well Count | ||||||
Newark East, Working Interest |
2 | 0.73 | ||||||
Newark East, Override Interest |
8 | 0.03 |
PRODUCTIVE WELLS AND ACREAGE:
The following is a breakdown of our productive wells and acreage as of May 31, 2009:
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net | Net | Gross | Total Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross | Productive | Total Gross | Productive | Developed | Developed | |||||||||||||||||||
Geographic Area | Oil Wells | Oil Wells | Gas Wells | Gas Wells | Acres | Acres | ||||||||||||||||||
Wise County |
| | 4 | .74 | 224 | 83.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Denton County |
| | 6 | .03 | 566 | 18.11 |
Notes:
1. | Total Gross Wells are those wells in which the Company holds a working or overriding interest in as of May 31, 2009. | |
2. | Net Productive Wells was calculated by multiplying the working or overriding interest held by the Company in each of the 10 Gross Wells and adding the resulting products. | |
3. | Total Gross Developed Acres is equal to the total surface acres of the properties in which the Company holds a working interest. | |
4. | Net Developed Acres is equal to the Total Gross Developed Acres multiplied by the percentage of the total working interest held by the Company in the respective properties. | |
5. | All acreage in which we hold a working interest as of May 31, 2009 have or had existing wells located thereon; thus all acreage leased by the Company may be accurately classified as developed. |
3
Table of Contents
6. | Acreage that has existing wells and may be classified as developed may also have additional development potential based on the number of producible zones beneath the surface acreage. A more comprehensive study of all properties currently leased by us would be required to determine precise developmental potential. |
ANADARKO BASIN- WESTERN OKLAHOMA
During part of the quarter we held a minor interest in three producing natural gas wells. In
addition to the wells we owned working interests in two lease tracts; one located in Ellis County,
Oklahoma with a gross acreage interest of 27.5% in 1,505 acres and the second located in Canadian
County, Oklahoma, constituting a gross acreage interest of 20% in 240 acres. The Company also held
a 3% interest in 640 acres in Beckham County, Oklahoma. The Company sold its interest in the
Oklahoma properties effective March 31, 2009.
OIL AND GAS PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
We currently own a 68.03% partnership interest in the Johnson No. 1-H and 65.61% partnership
interest in the Johnson No. 2-H. We sold our 58.66% partnership interest in the Hagansport #1 and
#2 Unit Joint Ventures to Gulftex effective April 1, 2008. We did not acquire any additional
partnership interests in the current quarter.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the audited financial
statements included on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes that the application of these
policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide useful and reliable financial
information about our operating results and financial condition.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results may differ from those estimates.
OVERVIEW
Going Concern and Liquidity Problems
Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion with respect to our
consolidated financial statements at November 30, 2008. The paragraph states that our recurring
losses from operations and resulting continued dependence on access to external financing raise
substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern. Furthermore, the factors
leading to and the existence of the explanatory paragraph may adversely affect our relationship
with customers and suppliers and have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain financing.
Our company has experienced operating losses over the past several years. We do not have
sufficient working capital to sustain our operations. We have been unable to generate sufficient
revenues to sustain our operations. If no additional funds are received, we will be forced to rely
on existing oil and gas revenue and upon additional funds which may or may not be loaned by an
affiliate to preserve the integrity of the corporate entity. No formal commitments or arrangements
currently exist with the affiliate to advance or loan funds to the Company. In the event we are
unable to acquire sufficient funds, the Companys ongoing operations will be negatively impacted
and we may not be able to continue as a going concern and we may have to curtail or terminate our
operations and liquidate our business.
4
Table of Contents
Sale of Assets
The Company sold its working interest in oil and gas leases located in Oklahoma effective March 31,
2009 for $1,687 and wrote off the fully depleted property values totaling $229,074.
On June 4, 2008, we executed a sales agreement (effective April 1, 2008) with Gulftex. Under the
agreement, we transferred all of our East Texas oil and gas properties with a net book value of
$106,431 to Gulftex. In consideration for the transfer of the properties, Gulftex forgave our trade
payables and advances totaling $1,052,547. In addition, Gulftex is assuming our asset retirement
obligations with a book value of $145,923. We recorded a gain of $1,092,040 on the sale.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the second quarter ended May 31, 2009 we reported a net loss of $90,437 as compared to net
income of $1,016,992 for the same quarter last year. For the six months ended May 31, 2009 we
reported a net loss of $218,396 as compared to net income of $804,364 for the same period last
year. The components of these results are explained below.
Revenues The components of our revenues for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008
are as follows:
Oil and gas revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2009 was $10,320, a decrease of 84.4%,
as compared to $66,304 for the three months ended May 31, 2008. The decrease is attributable to the
reduction in production resulting from the April 1, 2008 sale of our East Texas properties to
Gulftex offset by higher production and prices for our Johnson No. 1-H and No. 2-H wells. Oil and
gas revenue for the six months ended May 31, 2009 was $24,845, a decreased of 84.2%, as compared to
$157,281 for the six months ended May 31, 2008. The decrease is attributable to higher production
costs and lower prices on the Johnson #1 and #2 wells and the sales of our East Texas properties.
Following are the changes in oil and gas sales, barrels and volumes of natural gas sold and the
price received for those sales for the quarter.
The average price per MBTU decreased $4.67 and the MBTU sold decreased 2,716 from the quarter
ended May 31, 2008. The average price per barrel decreased $36.66 and the quantity sold decreased
by 261 barrels from the quarter ended May 31, 2008. The decrease in the barrels sold is primarily
attributable to the sales of our East Texas properties in 2008. The decrease in the quantity of gas
sold is primarily attributable to the Johnson No. 2-H being off-line for repairs in 2009.
Gas | MBTU | Price/ | Oil | Bbls | Price/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales | Sold | MBTU | Sales | Sold | Bbl | |||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2009 |
$ | 8,487 | 2,629 | $ | 3.23 | $ | 1,833 | 43 | $ | 42.63 | ||||||||||||||
May 31, 2008 |
$ | 42,199 | 5,345 | $ | 7.90 | $ | 24,105 | 304 | $ | 79.29 | ||||||||||||||
3 Month Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 vs 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
$ | (33,712 | ) | (2,716 | ) | $ | (4.67 | ) | $ | (22,272 | ) | (261 | ) | $ | (36.66 | ) | ||||||||
Percentage |
-79.89 | % | -50.81 | % | -59.11 | % | -92.40 | % | -85.86 | % | -46.24 | % |
As the above table shows, gas revenue decreased 79.89% and oil revenue decreased 92.40%
from fiscal year 2008.
Following are the changes in oil and gas sales, barrels and volumes of natural gas sold and the
price received for those sales for the fiscal year to date.
The average price per MBTU decreased $3.94 and the MBTU sold decreased 5,848 from the six
months ended May 31, 2008. The average price per barrel decreased $39.01 and the quantity sold
decreased by 816 barrels from the six months ended May 31, 2008. The decrease in the barrels sold
is attributable to the sale
5
Table of Contents
of our East Texas properties in 2008. The decrease in the quantity of
gas sold is primarily attributable to the Johnson No. 2-H being off-line for repairs in 2009.
Gas | MBTU | Price/ | Oil | Bbls | Price/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales | Sold | MBTU | Sales | Sold | Bbl | |||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2009 |
$ | 21,415 | 5,477 | $ | 3.91 | $ | 3,430 | 89 | $ | 38.54 | ||||||||||||||
May 31, 2008 |
$ | 88,934 | 11,325 | $ | 7.85 | $ | 70,192 | 905 | $ | 77.55 | ||||||||||||||
6 Month Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 vs 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
$ | (67,519 | ) | (5,848 | ) | $ | (3.94 | ) | $ | (66,762 | ) | (816 | ) | $ | (39.01 | ) | ||||||||
Percentage |
-75.92 | % | -51.64 | % | -50.19 | % | -95.11 | % | -90.17 | % | -50.30 | % |
As the above table shows, gas revenue increased 75.92% while oil revenue decreased 95.11%
from fiscal year 2008.
There was no joint venture income as component of revenue for the three months ended May 31,
2008 and 2009. Joint venture income as a component of revenue decreased $1,845, 100.0%, from a
loss of $1,845 for the six months ended May 31, 2008 to $0 for the six months ended May 31, 2009.
Expenses The components of our expenses for the three and six months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008
are as follows:
% | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase | Six Months Ended | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||
May 31, 2009 | May 31, 2008 | (Decrease) | May 31, 2009 | May 31, 2008 | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease operating and taxes |
$ | 8,905 | $ | 45,935 | -80.61 | % | $ | 20,665 | $ | 201,170 | -89.73 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
91,271 | 87,797 | 3.96 | % | 219,601 | 222,107 | -1.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depl, amort., & accretion |
2,268 | 7,620 | -70.24 | % | 4,662 | 21,680 | -78.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total expenses |
$ | 102,444 | $ | 141,352 | -27.53 | % | $ | 244,928 | $ | 444,957 | -44.95 | % | ||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses decreased $37,030 for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 and
decreased $180,505 for the six months ended May 31, 2009 over the same periods last year. The
decrease in quarterly and year to date operating expenses is primarily attributable to the sale of
our East Texas properties effective April 1, 2008. TBX paid Gulftex $0 for contract operating
services for the three months ended May 31, 2008 and $800 the three months ended May 31, 2008. TBX
paid Gulftex $0 for contract operating services for the six months ended May 31, 2009 and $3,200
for the six months ended May 31, 2008.
General and administrative expenses increased $3,474 for the three months ended May 31, 2009
as compared to the same period last year. The increase in general and administrative expenses is
attributable to higher professional fees of $27,746 rent of $12,835, salaries and wages of $9,086
and higher expenses in all other categories totaling $709 offset by lower compensation cost related
to stock options based compensation of $33,750, higher G&A cost allocations of $13,152. For the six
months ended May 31, 2009, General and administrative expenses decreased $2,506 as compared to the
same period last year. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is attributable to lower
compensation cost related to stock options based compensation of $80,000 offset by higher
professional fees of $66,621, salaries and wages of $9,081 and higher expenses in all other
categories totaling $1,792.
Depreciation and depletion expense totaled $2,012 for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and
$6,708 for the three months ended May 31, 2008. Depreciation and depletion expense totaled $4,151
for the six months ended May 31, 2008 and $18,346 for the six months ended May 31, 2008. The
decrease in depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense is attributable to lower oil and gas
property values from the same period last year and the sale of our East Texas properties. Accretion
expense totaled $256 for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and $912 for the three months ended
May 31, 2008. Accretion expense
6
Table of Contents
totaled $511 for the six months ended May 31, 2009 and $3,334 for
the six months ended May 31, 2008. The decrease in accretion expense is primarily attributable to
the transfer of our East Texas asset retirement obligations to Gulftex and the change in our
estimated liability from last fiscal year.
Other income decreased $1,090,353 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009 over the
same periods last year. . The Company sold its working interest in oil and gas leases located in
Oklahoma effective March 31, 2009 for $1,687 and wrote off the fully depleted property values
totaling $229,074. Effective April 1, 2008 we sold our East Texas properties to Gulftex for the
cancellation of payables and advances due them as well as their assumption of our East Texas asset
retirement obligations. We recorded a gain on the sale of $1,092,040
We have not recorded any income taxes for the six months ended May 31, 2008 because of our
accumulated losses. Also, since there is continued uncertainty as to the realization of a tax
asset, we have not recorded any tax benefit.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company had a cash balance of $2,823 as of May 31, 2009. Our current ratio at May 31, 2009 was
.45:1, and we had no long-term debt other than our asset retirement obligations of $21,492. As of
May 31, 2009, our stockholders deficit was $301,480. Net cash used for operations totaled $177,085
for the six months ended May 31, 2009 and $40,215 for the six months ended May 31, 2008. This
represents an increase of $136,870 in cash used for operating activities.
For the six months ended May 31, 2009 net cash provided by investing activities was $1,687 as the
result of the sale of our Oklahoma properties. For the six months ended May 31, 2008 net cash used
in investing activities totaled $28,461 as a result of our rework of a salt water disposal well.
Non-cash investing activity for the six months ended May 31, 2009 was $0. Non-cash investing
activity for the six months ended May 31, 2008 was $106,430. Effective April 1, 2008, we sold our
East Texas oil and gas properties with a net book value of $106,430 to Gulftex.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $177,402 for the six months ended May 31, 2009
and $45,777 for the same period last year. For the six months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 we
received advances from Gulftex totaling $177,402 and $42,027, respectively. Cash received from the
exercise of stock options totaled $0 for the six months ended May 31, 2009 and $3,750 for the six
months ended May 31, 2008. Non-cash financing activity for the six months ended May 31, 2009 was
$0. Non-cash financing activities for the six months ended May 31, 2008 was $1,195,137. As a result
of the sale of our East Texas properties to Gulftex we wrote-off payables to and advances form
affiliate totaling $1,052,547 and reduced our asset retirement obligations by $145,923. We also
increased our asset retirement obligations by $3,334 during the same period.
PLAN OF OPERATION FOR THE FUTURE
In the past we have primarily acquired producing oil and gas properties with opportunities for
future development and contracted well operations to contractors. Currently, our primary focus is
to secure additional capital through business alliances with third parties or other debt/equity
financing arrangements to acquire producing oil and gas leases and wells, acquire additional oil
and gas prospect leases and to acquire an exploration company that can also act as an operator of
our wells. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to execute
our plans or that if successful in securing the funds our actual results will improve.
We expect that the principal source of funds in the near future will be from oil and gas revenues
and advances from an affiliate. We have not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient
to cover our operating costs and continue as a going concern. Managements plan is to obtain
operating loans from an affiliate to meet its minimal operating expenses (no formal commitments or
arrangements currently exist with the affiliate to advance or loan funds to the Company) and seek
equity and/or debt financing. Any such additional funding will be done on an as needed basis and
will only be done in those instances in which we believe such additional expenditures will increase
our profitability. However, actual results may differ from managements plan and the amount may be
material.
7
Table of Contents
Our ability to acquire additional properties or equipment is strictly contingent upon our
ability to locate adequate financing or equity to pay for these additional properties or equipment.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the opportunity to buy properties or
equipment that are suitable for our investment or that we may be able to obtain financing or equity
to pay for the costs of these additional properties or equipment at terms that are acceptable to
us.. Additionally, if economic conditions justify the same, we may hire additional employees
although we do not currently have any definite plans to make additional hires.
The oil and gas industry is subject to various trends. In particular, at times crude oil prices
increase in the summer, during the heavy travel months, and are relatively less expensive in the
winter. Of course, the prices obtained for crude oil are dependent upon numerous other factors,
including the availability of other sources of crude oil, interest rates, and the overall health of
the economy. We are not aware of any specific trends that are unusual to our company, as compared
to the rest of the oil and gas industry.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. |
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
ITEM 4T. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of Tim Burroughs our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO)/Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as of the end of the quarter
covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded
that, as of May 31, 2008 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the
information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported. Management is currently looking for a professional
accounting person to become part of its management team in an effort to provide not only complete
but timely reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by its rules and forms.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter
to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting. As a result, no corrective actions
were required or undertaken.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. The Companys management, including the CEO/CFO, does
not expect that its Disclosure Controls or its Internal Controls will prevent all errors and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can
occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed
in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
8
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On May 28, 2009 the Company, along with Grasslands I, L.P., intervened as third party plaintiffs in
a lawsuit originally captioned as Clay Bain, et. al. v. Earthwise Energy, Inc. (EEI) which was
filed in April 2009 in the 14th Judicial District, Dallas County Texas, Cause No.
095253. Our petition requests that we be given certain injunctive relief and be awarded
unspecified damages for certain alleged causes of action including, but not limited to, fraud,
conversion and violation of fiduciary duty against defendant Earthwise Energy, Inc. but also as
against two individuals, Jeffery C. Reynolds and Steven C. Howard who were added to the lawsuit as
third party defendants. Mr. Reynolds is a former member of our Board of Directors who resigned in
July 2008. Included in our claim for damages is an oil and gas accounts receivable totaling
$129,120 as of May 31, 2009.
Item 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None.
Item 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
Item 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS: |
None.
Item 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
Due to the current financial condition of the Company, two of our officers, Tim Burroughs and
Sherri Cecotti have agreed, effective February 16, 2010, to draw no salary until such time as the
revenues of the Company are sufficient to sustain the operations of the Company including the
payment of their salaries. The forbearance of the above officers salary is a complete forbearance
and not a deferral.
None.
Item 6. | EXHIBITS |
(a) | EXHIBITS: |
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) | REPORTS ON FORM 8-K SIGNATURES |
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to
be signed by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
TBX RESOURCES, INC.
DATE: February 11, 2010
SIGNATURE:
|
/s/ Tim Burroughs | |||
TIM BURROUGHS, PRESIDENT/ CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
9