COUSINS PROPERTIES INC - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-11312
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
GEORGIA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
58-0869052 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
191 Peachtree Street, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia (Address of principal executive offices) |
30303-1740 (Zip Code) |
(404) 407-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at October 28, 2011 | |
Common Stock, $1 par value per share | 103,713,583 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters contained in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the federal securities laws and are subject to uncertainties and risks, as itemized in Item 1A
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These
forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of the
Companys business and the Companys financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans
and objectives. They also include, among other things, statements regarding subjects that are
forward-looking by their nature, such as:
| the Companys business and financial strategy; |
| the Companys ability to obtain future financing arrangements; |
| the Companys understanding of its competition and its ability to compete effectively; |
| potential acquisitions, new investments and/or dispositions; |
| projected operating results; |
| market and industry trends; |
| estimates relating to future distributions; |
| projected capital expenditures; and |
| interest rates. |
The forward-looking statements are based upon managements beliefs, assumptions and
expectations of the Companys future performance, taking into account information currently
available. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations may change as a result of many possible
events or factors, not all of which are known. If a change occurs, the Companys business,
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed
in forward-looking statements. Actual results may vary from forward-looking statements due to, but
not limited to, the following:
| availability and terms of capital and financing, both to fund operations and to
refinance indebtedness as it matures; |
| risks and uncertainties related to national and local economic conditions, the real
estate industry in general and in specific markets, and the commercial and residential
markets in particular; |
| changes in the Companys business and financial strategy and/or continued adverse market
and economic conditions requiring the recognition of additional impairment losses; |
| leasing risks, including an inability to obtain new tenants or renew tenants on
favorable terms, or at all, upon the expiration of existing leases and the ability to
lease newly developed or currently unleased space; |
| financial condition of existing tenants; |
| rising interest rates and insurance rates; |
| the availability of sufficient development or investment opportunities; |
| failure of purchase, sale or other contracts to ultimately close; |
| competition from other developers or investors; |
| the risks associated with real estate developments and investments (such as
construction delays, cost overruns and leasing/sales risk); |
| potential liability for uninsured losses, condemnation or environmental issues; |
| potential liability for a failure to meet regulatory requirements; |
| the financial condition and liquidity of, or disputes with, joint venture partners; |
| any failure to comply with debt covenants under credit agreements; and |
| any failure to continue to qualify for taxation as a real estate investment trust. |
The words believes, expects, anticipates, estimates, plans, may, intend, will,
or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although the Company
believes its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are
reasonable, the Company can give no assurance that such plans, intentions or expectations will be
achieved. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise, except as required
under U.S. federal securities laws.
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
PROPERTIES: |
||||||||
Operating properties, net of accumulated depreciation
of $286,399 and $274,925 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
$ | 826,015 | $ | 898,119 | ||||
Projects under development |
8,646 | | ||||||
Land held for investment or future development |
115,521 | 123,879 | ||||||
Residential lots |
63,835 | 63,403 | ||||||
Other |
738 | 2,994 | ||||||
Total properties |
1,014,755 | 1,088,395 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
5,634 | 7,599 | ||||||
RESTRICTED CASH |
5,514 | 15,521 | ||||||
NOTES AND OTHER RECEIVABLES, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $5,423 and $6,287 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
50,610 | 48,395 | ||||||
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
181,947 | 167,108 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
35,916 | 44,264 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 1,294,376 | $ | 1,371,282 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
NOTES PAYABLE |
$ | 462,134 | $ | 509,509 | ||||
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
30,732 | 32,388 | ||||||
DEFERRED GAIN |
4,039 | 4,216 | ||||||
DEPOSITS AND DEFERRED INCOME |
16,766 | 18,029 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
513,671 | 564,142 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
9,386 | 14,289 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, 20,000,000 shares authorized, $1 par value: |
||||||||
7.75% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock, $25 liquidation
preference; 2,993,090 shares issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010 |
74,827 | 74,827 | ||||||
7.50% Series B cumulative redeemable preferred stock, $25 liquidation
preference; 3,791,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010 |
94,775 | 94,775 | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 107,283,665 and
106,961,959 shares issued in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
107,284 | 106,962 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
686,108 | 684,551 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost, 3,570,082 shares in 2011 and 2010 |
(86,840 | ) | (86,840 | ) | ||||
Distributions in excess of cumulative net income |
(140,553 | ) | (114,196 | ) | ||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
735,601 | 760,079 | ||||||
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests |
35,718 | 32,772 | ||||||
TOTAL EQUITY |
771,319 | 792,851 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 1,294,376 | $ | 1,371,282 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental property revenues |
$ | 35,268 | $ | 33,840 | $ | 104,094 | $ | 100,630 | ||||||||
Fee income |
3,909 | 3,966 | 10,729 | 11,238 | ||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing revenues |
5,398 | 4,724 | 14,091 | 14,003 | ||||||||||||
Multi-family residential unit sales |
| 6,637 | 4,664 | 24,726 | ||||||||||||
Residential lot and outparcel sales |
165 | 630 | 410 | 14,765 | ||||||||||||
Other |
448 | 245 | 1,517 | 540 | ||||||||||||
45,188 | 50,042 | 135,505 | 165,902 | |||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental property operating expenses |
14,968 | 14,150 | 42,705 | 42,029 | ||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
4,241 | 4,122 | 12,414 | 13,294 | ||||||||||||
Multi-family residential unit cost of sales |
| 5,190 | 2,487 | 19,268 | ||||||||||||
Residential lot and outparcel cost of sales |
158 | 549 | 303 | 9,920 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
4,295 | 6,172 | 17,828 | 20,952 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
6,601 | 8,702 | 21,503 | 28,769 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursed expenses |
1,866 | 1,392 | 4,749 | 4,649 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
12,891 | 13,115 | 38,310 | 39,094 | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | 3,508 | 586 | ||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
15 | 202 | 193 | 303 | ||||||||||||
Other |
790 | 909 | 2,324 | 4,773 | ||||||||||||
45,825 | 54,503 | 146,324 | 183,637 | |||||||||||||
LOSS ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT |
(74 | ) | (9,235 | ) | (74 | ) | (9,827 | ) | ||||||||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES,
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES AND SALE OF
INVESTMENT PROPERTIES |
(711 | ) | (13,696 | ) | (10,893 | ) | (27,562 | ) | ||||||||
(PROVISION) BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES FROM OPERATIONS |
180 | (25 | ) | 217 | 1,107 | |||||||||||
INCOME FROM UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
2,660 | 2,179 | 7,468 | 7,493 | ||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE GAIN
ON SALE OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES |
2,129 | (11,542 | ) | (3,208 | ) | (18,962 | ) | |||||||||
GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENT PROPERTIES |
59 | 58 | 177 | 1,875 | ||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
2,188 | (11,484 | ) | (3,031 | ) | (17,087 | ) | |||||||||
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
597 | 452 | 1,353 | 3,451 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investment properties |
2,821 | 6,572 | 2,437 | 6,572 | ||||||||||||
3,418 | 7,024 | 3,790 | 10,023 | |||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
5,606 | (4,460 | ) | 759 | (7,064 | ) | ||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
(2,192 | ) | (696 | ) | (3,454 | ) | (1,806 | ) | ||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST |
3,414 | (5,156 | ) | (2,695 | ) | (8,870 | ) | |||||||||
DIVIDENDS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS |
(3,226 | ) | (3,226 | ) | (9,680 | ) | (9,680 | ) | ||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | 188 | $ | (8,382 | ) | $ | (12,375 | ) | $ | (18,550 | ) | |||||
PER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION BASIC AND DILUTED: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations attributable to controlling interest |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.28 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations |
0.03 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 0.00 | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | |||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES BASIC AND DILUTED |
103,715 | 101,893 | 103,631 | 100,995 | ||||||||||||
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.045 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.135 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited, in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Loss on | Distributions in | Nonredeemable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Paid-In | Treasury | Derivative | Excess of | Stockholders | Noncontrolling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Capital | Stock | Instruments | Net Income | Investment | Interests | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2010 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 106,962 | $ | 684,551 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | | $ | (114,196 | ) | $ | 760,079 | $ | 32,772 | $ | 792,851 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
| | | | | (2,695 | ) | (2,695 | ) | 3,358 | 663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | (2,695 | ) | (2,695 | ) | 3,358 | 663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director stock grants |
| 82 | 625 | | | | 707 | | 707 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises |
| 4 | 30 | | | | 34 | | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants, net of amounts
withheld for income taxes |
| 244 | (247 | ) | | | | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuance costs |
| | (16 | ) | | | | (16 | ) | | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock options and
restricted stock, net of forfeitures |
| (8 | ) | 1,691 | | | | 1,683 | | 1,683 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | 1,300 | 1,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (1,712 | ) | (1,712 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of redeemable
noncontrolling interests |
| | (526 | ) | | | | (526 | ) | | (526 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash preferred dividends paid |
| | | | | (9,680 | ) | (9,680 | ) | | (9,680 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash common dividends paid |
| | | | | (13,982 | ) | (13,982 | ) | | (13,982 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance September 30, 2011 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 107,284 | $ | 686,108 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | | $ | (140,553 | ) | $ | 735,601 | $ | 35,718 | $ | 771,319 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2009 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 103,352 | $ | 662,216 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | (9,517 | ) | $ | (51,402 | ) | $ | 787,411 | $ | 32,848 | $ | 820,259 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
| | | | | (8,870 | ) | (8,870 | ) | 1,759 | (7,111 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | | | 9,423 | | 9,423 | | 9,423 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | 9,423 | (8,870 | ) | 553 | 1,759 | 2,312 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued pursuant to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock dividend, net of issuance costs |
| 2,564 | 15,489 | | | (18,130 | ) | (77 | ) | | (77 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grants under director stock plan |
| 35 | 215 | | | | 250 | | 250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock grants |
| 264 | (124 | ) | | | | 140 | | 140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of stock options and
restricted stock, net of forfeitures |
| (10 | ) | 1,641 | | | | 1,631 | | 1,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of redeemable
noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | 1,144 | 1,144 | | 1,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | | (1,774 | ) | (1,774 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash preferred dividends paid |
| | | | | (9,680 | ) | (9,680 | ) | | (9,680 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash common dividends paid |
| | | | | (9,091 | ) | (9,091 | ) | | (9,091 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance September 30, 2010 |
$ | 169,602 | $ | 106,205 | $ | 679,437 | $ | (86,840 | ) | $ | (94 | ) | $ | (96,029 | ) | $ | 772,281 | $ | 32,833 | $ | 805,114 | |||||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 759 | $ | (7,064 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Gain on sale of investment properties, net |
(2,614 | ) | (8,447 | ) | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
74 | 592 | ||||||
Impairment loss |
3,508 | 586 | ||||||
Losses on abandoned predevelopment projects |
| 1,949 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
40,283 | 42,455 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,480 | 1,495 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,683 | 1,771 | ||||||
Effect of recognizing rental revenues on a straight-line or market basis |
(5,302 | ) | (3,635 | ) | ||||
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures |
(7,468 | ) | (7,493 | ) | ||||
Operating distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
7,416 | 7,814 | ||||||
Residential lot, outparcel and multi-family cost of sales, net of closing costs paid |
2,547 | 26,817 | ||||||
Residential lot acquisition and development expenditures |
(818 | ) | (1,663 | ) | ||||
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Change in other receivables and other assets |
(1,015 | ) | 1,536 | |||||
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(2,052 | ) | 4,628 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
38,481 | 61,341 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from investment property sales |
69,615 | 98,694 | ||||||
Property acquisition and development and tenant asset expenditures |
(34,700 | ) | (26,355 | ) | ||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
(13,885 | ) | (8,344 | ) | ||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
5,403 | 3,654 | ||||||
Payment of debt guarantee of unconsolidated joint venture |
| (17,250 | ) | |||||
Collection of notes receivable |
348 | 132 | ||||||
Change in other assets |
(3,210 | ) | (1,852 | ) | ||||
Change in restricted cash |
10,007 | (14,047 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
33,578 | 34,632 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from credit facility |
98,850 | 43,400 | ||||||
Repayment of credit and term facilities |
(84,450 | ) | (113,800 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from other notes payable |
| 27,034 | ||||||
Repayment of notes payable |
(58,401 | ) | (32,479 | ) | ||||
Payment of loan issuance costs |
(442 | ) | (1,997 | ) | ||||
Common stock issued, net of expenses |
18 | 173 | ||||||
Cash common dividends paid |
(13,982 | ) | (9,091 | ) | ||||
Cash preferred dividends paid |
(9,680 | ) | (9,680 | ) | ||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
1,300 | 2,113 | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(7,237 | ) | (1,899 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(74,024 | ) | (96,226 | ) | ||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(1,965 | ) | (253 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
7,599 | 9,464 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 5,634 | $ | 9,211 | ||||
INTEREST PAID, NET OF AMOUNTS CAPITALIZED |
$ | 19,679 | $ | 27,063 | ||||
INCOME TAXES REFUNDED, NET OF AMOUNTS PAID |
$ | 377 | $ | 3,288 | ||||
SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS: |
||||||||
Transfer from other assets to investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ | 6,050 | | |||||
Transfer from investment in joint venture to deposits and deferred income |
| $ | 12,713 | |||||
Land received on note receivable default |
| $ | 5,030 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2011
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein include the accounts of
Cousins Properties Incorporated (Cousins) and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Cousins
Real Estate Corporation and its subsidiaries (CREC). All of the entities included in the
condensed consolidated financial statements are hereinafter referred to collectively as the
Company.
Cousins has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) and intends to,
among other things, distribute 100% of its federal taxable income to stockholders, thereby
eliminating any liability for federal income taxes under current law. Therefore, the results
included herein do not include a federal income tax provision for Cousins. CREC operates as a
taxable REIT subsidiary and is taxed separately from Cousins as a C-Corporation. Accordingly, if
applicable, the Statements of Operations include a provision for, or benefit from, CRECs income
taxes.
The condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and were prepared by the Company
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). In the opinion of management, these financial
statements reflect all adjustments necessary (which adjustments are of a normal and recurring
nature) for the fair presentation of the Companys financial position as of September 30, 2011 and
the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The
results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily
indicative of results expected for the full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. These condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The accounting policies employed are substantially the same as those shown in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements included in such Form 10-K.
The Company earns fees and incurs expenses related to the management, development and leasing
of properties owned both by third parties and by joint ventures in which the Company has an
ownership interest. In the first quarter of 2011, the Company began separating on the Statements
of Operations the third party management and leasing revenues, including reimbursements, for
Cousins Properties Services (CPS), a wholly-owned subsidiary that performs management and leasing
services for third-party owned office properties. The Company also began separately stating
expenses associated with CPS which were previously included in the General and Administrative and
Other expense line items. The amounts remaining in Fee Income on the Statements of Operations
relate to management, leasing and development fees, including reimbursements, earned by the Company
from certain other third party property owners and from joint ventures. Reimbursed amounts
relating to these entities are also shown in a separate expense line item, including reimbursed
expenses that were previously presented in Other expense. Unreimbursed expenses related to third
party management activities outside of CPS are included in General and Administrative expense.
Prior periods have been revised to conform to this new presentation.
7
Table of Contents
2. NOTES PAYABLE, INTEREST EXPENSE AND COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The following table summarizes the terms and amounts of the Companys notes payable
outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Term/ | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Description | Interest Rate | Period (Years) | Maturity | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Terminus 100 mortgage note |
5.25% | 12/30 | 1/1/23 | $ | 138,695 | $ | 140,000 | |||||||||||
The American Cancer Society Center mortgage
note (interest only until October 1, 2011) |
6.45% | 10/30 | 9/1/17 | 136,000 | 136,000 | |||||||||||||
Credit Facility, unsecured (see note) |
LIBOR + 1.75% to 2.25% | 5/N/A | 8/29/12 | 119,800 | 105,400 | |||||||||||||
Meridian Mark Plaza mortgage note |
6.00% | 10/30 | 8/1/20 | 26,640 | 26,892 | |||||||||||||
100/200 North Point Center East mortgage note |
5.39% | 5/30 | 6/1/12 | 24,568 | 24,830 | |||||||||||||
The Points at Waterview mortgage note |
5.66% | 10/25 | 1/1/16 | 16,252 | 16,592 | |||||||||||||
Callaway Gardens |
4.13% | N/A | 11/18/13 | 178 | 173 | |||||||||||||
Mahan Village LLC (see note) |
3.25% | 3/N/A | 9/12/14 | 1 | | |||||||||||||
Lakeshore Park Plaza mortgage note (see note) |
5.89% | 4/25 | 8/1/12 | | 17,544 | |||||||||||||
600 University Park Place mortgage note (see note) |
7.38% | 10/30 | 8/10/11 | | 12,292 | |||||||||||||
333/555 North Point Center East mortgage note (see note) |
7.00% | 10/25 | 11/1/11 | | 26,412 | |||||||||||||
Handy Road Associates, LLC (see note) |
Prime + 1%, but not < 6% | 5/N/A | 3/30/2011 | | 3,374 | |||||||||||||
$ | 462,134 | $ | 509,509 | |||||||||||||||
The Companys Credit Facility bears interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus a spread, based on the Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2011, the spread over LIBOR under the Credit Facility was 2.0%. The amount that
the Company may draw under the Credit Facility is a defined calculation based on the Companys
unencumbered assets and other factors. Total borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was $350
million at September 30, 2011. The Credit Facility had a maturity date of August 29, 2011. On
that date, the Company exercised a one-year extension option which changed the maturity date to
August 29, 2012, and paid a $438,000 extension fee.
On September 12, 2011, the Company, formed Mahan Village LLC (Mahan), a consolidated entity
where a partner has a noncontrolling interest, to construct Mahan Village, a 147,000 square foot
retail center in Tallahassee, Florida. Mahan entered into a construction loan agreement, secured
by the project, to provide for up to approximately $15.0 million to fund construction. The debt
contains two interest rate options, as defined in the loan agreement, which are based on
floating-rate indices plus a spread. The loan matures September 12, 2014, and may be extended for
two, one-year periods if certain conditions are met. The Company guarantees up to 25% of the
construction loan, which may be eliminated after project completion, based on certain covenants.
On June 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the 333/555 North Point Center East
mortgage note. On July 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the Lakeshore Park Plaza
mortgage note, and expensed approximately $74,000 of unamortized loan closing costs, which are
reflected as Loss on Extinguishment of Debt on the 2011 Statements of Operations. On August 10,
2011, the Company repaid the 600 University Park Place mortgage note in full upon its maturity.
In May 2011, the Company was released of its obligation under the Handy Road Associates, LLC
mortgage note through foreclosure.
Fair Value
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the estimated fair values of the Companys notes
payable were approximately $496.3 million and $521.8 million, respectively, calculated by
discounting future cash flows at estimated rates at which similar loans could have been obtained at
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. This fair value calculation is considered to be a Level
2 calculation under the guidelines as set forth in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, as the Company utilizes estimates of market rates for similar type loans from third
party brokers.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
In 2010, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement to manage its interest rate risk
associated with its floating-rate, LIBOR-based borrowings. This swap expired in October 2010.
Also during 2010, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement to manage interest rate risk
under its former $100 million term
facility, which swap was terminated in July 2010 when the term facility was paid in full. The
changes in fair value of the interest rate swap agreements were recorded in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss on the Balance Sheets.
8
Table of Contents
Other Information
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, interest
expense was as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Total interest incurred |
$ | 6,838 | $ | 8,702 | $ | 21,740 | $ | 28,769 | ||||||||
Interest capitalized |
(237 | ) | | (237 | ) | | ||||||||||
Total interest expense |
$ | 6,601 | $ | 8,702 | $ | 21,503 | $ | 28,769 | ||||||||
The real estate and other assets of The American Cancer Society Center (the ACS Center)
are restricted under the ACS Center loan agreement in that they are not available to settle debts
of the Company. However, provided that the ACS Center loan has not incurred any uncured event of
default, as defined in the loan agreement, the cash flows from the ACS Center, after payments of
debt service, operating expenses and reserves, are available for distribution to the Company.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of
$3.0 million. As a lessor, the Company has $15.6 million in future obligations under leases to
fund tenant improvements and other funding commitments as of September 30, 2011. As a lessee, the
Company has future obligations under ground and office leases of approximately $16.3 million at
September 30, 2011.
Litigation
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and administrative proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability
insurance. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any
potential loss relating to these matters using the latest information available. The Company
records a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss or
range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable
estimate of the loss is a range, the Company accrues the best estimate within the range. If no
amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the Company accrues the minimum
amount within the range. If an unfavorable outcome is probable but the amount of the loss cannot
be reasonably estimated, the Company discloses the nature of the litigation and indicates that an
estimate of the loss or range of loss cannot be made. If an unfavorable outcome is reasonably
possible and the estimated loss is material, the Company discloses the nature and estimate of the
possible loss of the litigation. The Company does not disclose information with respect to
litigation where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be remote. Based on current expectations,
such matters, both individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the liquidity, results of operations, business or financial condition of the Company.
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income (loss) per share-basic is calculated as net income (loss) available to common
stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period,
including nonvested restricted stock which has nonforfeitable dividend rights. Net income (loss)
per share-diluted is calculated as net (income) loss available to common stockholders divided by
the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
weighted average number of common shares uses the same weighted average share number as in the
basic calculation and adds the potential dilution that would occur if stock options (or any other
contracts to issue common stock) were exercised and resulted in additional common shares
outstanding, calculated using the treasury stock method. The numerator is reduced for the effect
of preferred dividends in both the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share calculations.
Weighted average shares-basic and diluted for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2011
and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average shares basic |
103,715 | 101,893 | 103,631 | 100,995 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential common shares stock options |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares diluted |
103,715 | 101,893 | 103,631 | 100,995 | ||||||||||||
Stock options are dilutive when the average market price of the Companys stock during
the period exceeds the option exercise price. However, in periods where the Company is in a net
loss position, the dilutive effect of stock options is not included in the diluted weighted average
shares total.
9
Table of Contents
Anti-dilutive stock options represent stock options which are outstanding but which are not
exercisable during the period because the exercise price exceeded the average market value of the
Companys stock. These anti-dilutive stock options are not included in the current calculation of
dilutive weighted average shares, but could be dilutive in the future. Total weighted average
anti-dilutive stock options for each of the periods are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Anti-dilutive options |
6,479 | 7,061 | 6,453 | 7,086 |
4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has several types of stock-based compensation stock options, restricted stock,
long-term incentive awards and restricted stock units (RSUs) which are described in Note 6 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010. The expense related to certain stock-based compensation awards is
fixed. The expense related to other awards fluctuates from period to period dependent, in part, on
the Companys stock price.
The Company reversed previously recognized stock-based compensation expense, net of amounts
capitalized and income tax effect, if any, of $435,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2011
and recorded net stock-based compensation expense of $1.3 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2011. The three-month 2011 reversal of expense was mainly due to a period-to-period
drop in the Companys stock price.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded net stock-based
compensation expense of $549,000 and $2.4 million, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2011, the Company granted 211,729 stock options to key employees and
1,019 stock options to a new director. Also during the first quarter of 2011, the Company made
restricted stock grants of 214,206 shares to key employees with a three-year ratable vesting, and
29,411 shares to a key employee, which cliff vest in three years.
RSUs and the long-term incentive awards are accounted for as liability awards under ASC 718,
Stock Compensation, and employees are paid cash at vesting based upon the closing prices of the
Companys stock or other prescribed cash amounts. During 2011, the Company awarded 401 RSUs to a
new director and 56,845 RSUs to employees, both of which cliff vest in three years. Also during
2011, the Company awarded two types of performance-based RSUs to key employees based on the
following performance metrics: (1) Total Stockholder Return of the Company, as defined, as compared
to the companies in the SNL Financial US Office REIT index as of January 1, 2011 (TSR SNL RSUs),
and (2) ratio of cumulative funds from operations per share to targeted cumulative funds from
operations per share amount (FFO RSUs). The performance period for both awards is January 1,
2011 to December 31, 2013, and the targeted number of TSR SNL RSUs and FFO RSUs is 99,970 and
64,266, respectively. The ultimate payout of these awards can range from 0% to 200% of the targeted
number of units depending on the achievement of the performance metrics described above. Both of
these types of RSUs cliff vest on February 15, 2014 and are dependent upon the
attainment of required service and performance criteria. The number of RSUs vesting will be
determined at that date, and the payout per unit will be equal to the average closing price on each
trading day during the 30-day period ending on December 31, 2013. The Company expenses an estimate
of the fair value of the TSR SNL RSUs over the vesting period using a quarterly Monte Carlo
valuation. The Company expenses the FFO RSUs over the vesting period using the fair market value
of the Companys stock at the reporting date multiplied by the anticipated number of units to be
paid based on the current estimate of what the ratio is expected to be upon vesting. Dividend
equivalents on the RSUs will also be paid based upon the percentage vested. The dividend
equivalent payments will equal the total cash dividends that would have been paid during the
performance period, and as if the cash dividends had been reinvested in Company stock.
10
Table of Contents
5. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The Company describes its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in Note 4 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010. The following table summarizes balance sheet data of the Companys unconsolidated joint
ventures as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands). The investments in joint
ventures which have negative balances are included in the Deposits and Deferred Income line item on
the Balance Sheets.
Total Assets | Total Debt | Total Equity | Companys Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL POSITION: | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture IV LLC entities |
$ | 305,748 | $ | 313,603 | $ | 36,181 | $ | 36,620 | $ | 258,768 | $ | 267,085 | $ | 14,886 | $ | 15,364 | |||||||||||||||||
Charlotte Gateway Village, LLC |
150,730 | 154,200 | 86,664 | 97,030 | 60,440 | 54,834 | 10,341 | 10,366 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CF Murfreesboro Associates |
126,353 | 129,738 | 99,834 | 103,378 | 24,570 | 24,263 | 14,351 | 14,246 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palisades West LLC |
125,089 | 129,378 | | | 80,220 | 80,767 | 41,926 | 42,256 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture LLC entities |
103,105 | 106,066 | | | 100,494 | 104,067 | 3,403 | 3,779 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CL Realty, L.L.C. |
82,357 | 86,657 | 1,047 | 2,663 | 79,003 | 82,534 | 37,954 | 39,928 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSREF/Terminus 200 LLC |
80,563 | 65,164 | 55,426 | 46,169 | 14,130 | 13,956 | 2,825 | 2,791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Temco Associates, LLC |
60,258 | 60,608 | 2,824 | 2,929 | 56,901 | 57,475 | 22,434 | 22,713 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cousins Watkins LLC |
56,665 | 57,184 | 28,649 | 28,850 | 27,289 | 28,334 | 16,059 | 14,850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crawford Long CPI, LLC |
32,105 | 34,408 | 47,905 | 48,701 | (16,712 | ) | (15,341 | ) | (7,134 | ) | (6,431 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
EP I LLC |
22,302 | | 1 | | 18,967 | | 17,083 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ten Peachtree Place Associates |
21,514 | 20,980 | 26,342 | 26,782 | (5,080 | ) | (6,263 | ) | (4,150 | ) | (4,581 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Wildwood Associates |
21,344 | 21,220 | | | 21,250 | 21,216 | (1,625 | ) | (1,642 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
TRG Columbus Development Venture, Ltd. |
3,051 | 3,574 | | | 1,864 | 2,115 | 6 | 58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pine Mountain Builders, LLC |
425 | 1,559 | | 896 | 247 | 403 | 679 | 757 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,191,609 | $ | 1,184,339 | $ | 384,873 | $ | 394,018 | $ | 722,351 | $ | 715,445 | $ | 169,038 | $ | 154,454 | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table summarizes statement of operations information of the Companys
unconsolidated joint ventures for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Companys Share of Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenues | Net Income (Loss) | Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS: | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture IV LLC entities |
$ | 23,133 | $ | 23,368 | $ | 3,111 | $ | 2,950 | $ | 811 | $ | 839 | ||||||||||||
Charlotte Gateway Village, LLC |
24,324 | 23,892 | 6,517 | 5,788 | 882 | 882 | ||||||||||||||||||
CF Murfreesboro Associates |
9,903 | 10,457 | 307 | 956 | (44 | ) | 312 | |||||||||||||||||
Palisades West LLC |
12,256 | 10,145 | 4,371 | 3,406 | 2,132 | 1,651 | ||||||||||||||||||
CP Venture LLC entities |
14,259 | 13,921 | 6,132 | 6,458 | 619 | 669 | ||||||||||||||||||
CL Realty, L.L.C. |
5,282 | 5,332 | 2,481 | 2,185 | 1,007 | 1,661 | ||||||||||||||||||
MSREF/Terminus 200 LLC |
3,875 | 928 | (2,912 | ) | (835 | ) | (585 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Temco Associates, LLC |
405 | 2,110 | (782 | ) | 429 | (383 | ) | 214 | ||||||||||||||||
Cousins Watkins LLC |
3,633 | | 47 | | 1,799 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Crawford Long CPI, LLC |
8,924 | 8,614 | 1,828 | 1,432 | 913 | 715 | ||||||||||||||||||
EP I LLC |
| | (6 | ) | | (4 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Ten Peachtree Place Associates |
5,413 | 5,875 | 801 | 734 | 413 | 378 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wildwood Associates |
| | (126 | ) | (85 | ) | (63 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||||||||||||
TRG Columbus Development Venture, Ltd. |
23 | 1,097 | (1 | ) | 403 | 48 | 327 | |||||||||||||||||
Pine Mountain Builders, LLC |
2,926 | 2,202 | (156 | ) | 129 | (78 | ) | 59 | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 533 | | 55 | 1 | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 114,356 | $ | 108,474 | $ | 21,612 | $ | 24,005 | $ | 7,468 | $ | 7,493 | |||||||||||||
On June 28, 2011, EP I LLC (EP I) was formed between the Company, with a 75% ownership
interest, and Lion Gables Realty Limited Partnership (Gables), with a 25% ownership interest, for
the purpose of developing and operating Emory Point, the first phase of a mixed-use property in
Atlanta, Georgia. Profits and losses are allocated to the partners based on their percentage
ownership interests, with no preferences or promotes. Upon formation, the Company contributed
approximately $8.1 million in cash and $3.1 million in
predevelopment assets, and Gables contributed a total of approximately $3.8 million in cash
and other assets. The Companys investment in EP I includes cash contributions subsequent to
formation and other previously capitalized assets related to the venture, for a total investment
balance of $17.1 million at September 30, 2011. The Company anticipates it will make approximately
$16.7 million in additional cash contributions to the venture for project development. Upon
formation, EP I also entered into a construction loan agreement, secured by the project, to provide
for up to $61.1 million to fund construction. The venture may select from two interest rate
options, as defined in the loan agreement, which are based on floating-rate indices plus a spread.
The loan matures June 28, 2014 and may be extended for two, one-year periods if certain conditions
are met. The Company and Gables guarantee up to approximately $11.5 million and $3.8 million of
the construction loan, respectively. These guarantees may be eliminated after project completion,
based on certain covenants.
11
Table of Contents
6. OTHER ASSETS
Other Assets on the Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 included the
following (in thousands):
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Investment in Verde Realty |
$ | 5,868 | $ | 9,376 | ||||
FF&E and leasehold improvements, net of accumulated depreciation
of $17,399 and $16,117 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
4,923 | 4,673 | ||||||
Predevelopment costs and earnest money |
1,935 | 7,039 | ||||||
Lease inducements, net of accumulated amortization
of $3,584 and $2,991 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
12,610 | 11,899 | ||||||
Loan closing costs, net of accumulated amortization
of $4,043 and $3,109 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
1,591 | 2,703 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
3,067 | 2,296 | ||||||
Intangible Assets: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
5,155 | 5,430 | ||||||
Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization
of $8,769 and $8,741 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
499 | 526 | ||||||
In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization
of $2,545 and $2,492 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
268 | 322 | ||||||
$ | 35,916 | $ | 44,264 | |||||
Investment in Verde Realty (Verde) relates to a cost method investment in a non-public
real estate investment trust. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company determined that there
were impairment indicators related to its investment in Verde, including Verdes withdrawal of its
proposed initial public offering. The Company estimated the fair value of Verde by calculating
discounted future cash flows using Level 3 inputs, such as market capitalization rates, discount
rates and other items. The fair value estimate was less than carrying value, and the Company
determined the impairment was other-than-temporary in accordance with accounting standards for
investments in unconsolidated entities. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment loss of
$3.5 million.
Goodwill relates entirely to the Office reportable segment. As office assets are sold, either
by the Company or by joint ventures in which the Company has an ownership interest, a portion of
goodwill is written off to the cost of each sale. The following is a summary of goodwill activity
for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and there were no changes for the nine month 2010
period (see Note 9 for additional information regarding property sales):
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 5,430 | ||
Allocated to property sale |
(275 | ) | ||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
$ | 5,155 | ||
7. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
The Company consolidates various entities that are involved in the ownership and/or
development of real estate. The partners share of an entity, in cases where an entitys
documents do not contain a required redemption clause, is reflected in a separate line item called
Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests shown within Equity on the Balance Sheets. Correspondingly,
the partners share of income or loss is recorded in Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling
Interests in the Statements of Operations.
12
Table of Contents
Other consolidated entities contain provisions requiring the Company to purchase the partners
share of the entity at a certain value upon demand or at a future prescribed date. In these
situations, the partners share of the entity is recognized as Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
and is presented between liabilities and equity on the Balance Sheets, with the corresponding share
of income or loss in the entity recorded in Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in
the Statements of Operations. The redemption values are evaluated each period and adjusted to the
higher of fair value or the partners cost basis within the equity section of the Balance Sheet.
The Company recognizes these changes in the estimated redemption value as they occur. The
following table details the components of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in consolidated
entities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 14,289 | $ | 12,591 | ||||
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
96 | 47 | ||||||
Contributions from (distributions to) noncontrolling interests |
(5,525 | ) | 1,988 | |||||
Change in fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interests |
526 | (1,144 | ) | |||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 9,386 | $ | 13,482 | ||||
The following reconciles the net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as shown
in the Statements of Equity, which only includes nonredeemable interests, to the net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests as shown in the Statements of Operations, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests |
$ | 3,358 | $ | 1,759 | ||||
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
96 | 47 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,454 | $ | 1,806 | ||||
8. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
The Company has five reportable segments: Office, Retail, Land, CPS Third Party Management
and Leasing, and Other. These reportable segments represent an aggregation of operating segments
reported to the Chief Operating Decision Maker based on similar economic characteristics that
include the type of product and nature of service. Each segment includes both consolidated
operations and joint ventures. The Office and Retail segments show the results by each product
type. For these two segments, net operating income is calculated as rental property revenues less
rental property operating expenses. The Land segment includes results of operations for various
tracts of land that are held for investment or future development, and single-family residential
communities that are parceled into lots and sold to various homebuilders or sold as undeveloped
tracts of land. Fee income and related expenses for the third party owned properties managed or
leased by the Companys CPS subsidiary are included in the CPS Third Party Management and Leasing
segment. In 2010, the Company had an additional segment, the For-Sale Multi-Family Residential
Unit segment which included results of operations for the development and sale of multi-family real
estate projects. The Company sold substantially all of its multi-family residential units in the
first quarter of 2011, and the 2011 results for this segment are included in the Other segment.
The Other segment also includes:
| fee income for third party owned and joint venture properties, other than those managed
by CPS, for which the Company performs management, development and leasing services (fee
income from residential joint ventures is included in the Land segment); |
| compensation for corporate employees, other than those in the CPS Third Party
Management and Leasing segment; |
| general corporate overhead costs, interest expense for consolidated entities (as
financing decisions are made at the corporate level, with the exception of joint venture
interest expense, which is included in joint venture results in the respective segment); |
| income attributable to noncontrolling interests; |
| income taxes; |
| depreciation; |
| preferred dividends; and |
| operations of the Industrial properties, which are not material for separate
presentation. |
Company management evaluates the performance of its reportable segments in part based on funds
from operations available to common stockholders (FFO). FFO is a supplemental operating
performance measure used in the real estate industry. The Company calculated FFO using the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) definition of FFO, which is net
income (loss) available to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding
extraordinary items, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and gains or losses from
sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis.
13
Table of Contents
FFO is used by industry analysts, investors and the Company as a supplemental measure of a
REITs operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes
that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values
instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and
analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use
historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a
supplemental measure of a REITs operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation,
among other items, from GAAP net income. Management believes the use of FFO, combined with the
required primary GAAP presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding
of operating results of REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating
results more meaningful. Company management evaluates operating performance in part based on FFO.
Additionally, the Company uses FFO, along with other measures, to assess performance in connection
with evaluating and granting incentive compensation to its officers and other key employees.
Segment net income, investment in joint ventures and capital expenditures are not presented in
the following tables. Management does not utilize these measures when analyzing its segments or
when making resource allocation decisions, and therefore this information is not provided. FFO is
reconciled to net income (loss) on a total Company basis (in thousands).
CPS Third | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 15,442 | $ | 5,026 | $ | | $ | | $ | 907 | $ | 21,375 | ||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 14 | 3,300 | 2,029 | 5,343 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, outparcel and multi-family unit sales, net of cost of sales |
| | 7 | | | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
368 | | | | 80 | 448 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (2,143 | ) | | (2,143 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | (4,295 | ) | (4,295 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | (6,601 | ) | (6,601 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | (388 | ) | (388 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
| | | | (15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | (790 | ) | (790 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | | (74 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
2,766 | 2,110 | 225 | | (2 | ) | 5,099 | |||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests, excluding amounts
related to gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
| | | | (611 | ) | (611 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes from operations |
| | | | 180 | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | (3,226 | ) | (3,226 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 18,576 | $ | 7,136 | $ | 246 | $ | 1,157 | $ | (12,806 | ) | 14,309 | ||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(15,420 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest related to gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties |
(1,581 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
2,880 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 188 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
CPS Third | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | For-Sale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Multi-Family | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 14,658 | $ | 5,262 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,092 | $ | 21,012 | ||||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 117 | 2,540 | | 2,457 | 5,114 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, multi-family unit, tract and outparcel sales, net of cost
of sales, including gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
| (1 | ) | 81 | | 1,447 | | 1,527 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
8 | 18 | | | | 230 | 256 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (1,938 | ) | | | (1,938 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | | (6,172 | ) | (6,172 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | | (8,702 | ) | (8,702 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | | (441 | ) | (441 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
(202 | ) | (202 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | | (909 | ) | (909 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | | | (9,235 | ) | (9,235 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
2,532 | 1,458 | 368 | | 165 | | 4,523 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | (696 | ) | (696 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes from operations |
| | | | | (25 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | (3,226 | ) | (3,226 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 17,198 | $ | 6,737 | $ | 566 | $ | 602 | $ | 1,612 | $ | (25,829 | ) | 886 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(15,899 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
6,631 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (8,382 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CPS Third | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 46,152 | $ | 15,607 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,868 | $ | 64,627 | ||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 105 | 7,536 | 5,875 | 13,516 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, outparcel and multi-family unit sales, net of cost of sales |
| 50 | 57 | | 2,177 | 2,284 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,185 | 34 | | | 386 | 1,605 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (5,859 | ) | | (5,859 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | (17,828 | ) | (17,828 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | (21,503 | ) | (21,503 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | | | (3,508 | ) | (3,508 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | (1,323 | ) | (1,323 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
| | | | (193 | ) | (193 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | (2,324 | ) | (2,324 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | | (74 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
8,215 | 6,476 | 504 | | 48 | 15,243 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests, excluding amounts
related to gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
| | | | (1,873 | ) | (1,873 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes from operations |
| | | | 217 | 217 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | (9,680 | ) | (9,680 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 55,552 | $ | 22,167 | $ | 666 | $ | 1,677 | $ | (46,735 | ) | 33,327 | ||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(46,735 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest related to gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties |
(1,581 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of depreciated investment properties, net |
2,614 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (12,375 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
CPS Third | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Party | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management | For-Sale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | Office | Retail | Land | and Leasing | Multi-Family | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 44,368 | $ | 18,775 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,240 | $ | 65,383 | ||||||||||||||
Fee income, net of reimbursed expenses |
| | 411 | 6,871 | | 6,178 | 13,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential lot, multi-family unit, tract and outparcel sales, net of cost
of sales, including gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
| 4,584 | 755 | | 5,458 | 1,204 | 12,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
18 | 79 | | | | 473 | 570 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expenses |
| | | (6,162 | ) | | | (6,162 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| | | | | (20,952 | ) | (20,952 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | | | (28,769 | ) | (28,769 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets |
| | | | | (1,475 | ) | (1,475 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Separation expenses |
| | | | | (303 | ) | (303 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | | (4,773 | ) | (4,773 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | | | (586 | ) | | (586 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | | | | (9,827 | ) | (9,827 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations from unconsolidated joint ventures |
7,374 | 4,823 | 2,049 | | 327 | | 14,573 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | (1,806 | ) | (1,806 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes from operations |
| | | | | 1,107 | 1,107 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
| | | | | (9,680 | ) | (9,680 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations available to common stockholders |
$ | 51,760 | $ | 28,261 | $ | 3,215 | $ | 709 | $ | 5,199 | $ | (66,383 | ) | 22,761 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including Companys
share of joint ventures |
(48,060 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of depreciated investment properties |
6,749 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (18,550 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
When reviewing the results of operations for the Company, management analyzes the
following revenue and income items net of their related costs:
| Rental property operations, including discontinued; |
||
| Reimbursements of third-party and joint venture personnel costs; |
||
| Residential, tract and outparcel sales; |
||
| Multi-family unit sales; and |
||
| Gains or losses on sales of investment properties. |
These amounts are shown in the segment tables above in the same net manner as shown to
management. Certain adjustments are required to reconcile the above segment information to the
Companys consolidated revenues, including adjusting for gains on sales of investment properties,
as these gains are not presented within revenues in the Statements of Operations. The following
table reconciles information presented in the tables above to the Companys consolidated revenues
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income, including discontinued operations |
$ | 21,375 | $ | 21,012 | $ | 64,627 | $ | 65,383 | ||||||||
Plus rental property operating expenses, including discontinued operations |
14,968 | 14,150 | 42,705 | 42,029 | ||||||||||||
Fee income |
5,343 | 5,114 | 13,516 | 13,460 | ||||||||||||
Third party management and leasing expense reimbursements |
2,098 | 2,184 | 6,555 | 7,132 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursed expenses |
1,866 | 1,392 | 4,749 | 4,649 | ||||||||||||
Residential lot, outparcel, and multi-family unit sales, net of cost of
sales, including
gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
7 | 1,527 | 2,284 | 12,001 | ||||||||||||
Less gain on sale of undepreciated investment properties not included in
revenues |
| 1 | | (1,698 | ) | |||||||||||
Plus residential lot, multi-family unit and outparcel cost of sales |
158 | 5,739 | 2,790 | 29,188 | ||||||||||||
Net operating income from discontinued operations not included in revenues |
(1,075 | ) | (1,322 | ) | (3,238 | ) | (6,782 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
448 | 256 | 1,605 | 570 | ||||||||||||
Other income discontinued operations |
| (11 | ) | (88 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||||
Total consolidated revenues |
$ | 45,188 | $ | 50,042 | $ | 135,505 | $ | 165,902 | ||||||||
16
Table of Contents
9. PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS AND INFORMATION
In September 2011, the Company sold One Georgia Center, a 376,000 square foot office building
in Atlanta, Georgia. The sales price was $48.6 million and a gain of $2.8 million was recognized
on the sale. In conjunction with the sale, the Company recorded $1.6 million in expense related to
the partners noncontrolling interest in the property which is included in Net Income Attributable
to Noncontrolling Interests on the Statement of Operations. In February 2011, the Company sold
Jefferson Mill Business Park Building A, a 459,000 square foot industrial property in suburban
Atlanta, Georgia, for $22.0 million. In October 2010, the Company sold 8995 Westside Parkway, a
51,000 square foot office building in suburban Atlanta, Georgia. The results of operations for
8995 Westside Parkway are included in the table below, although no gain from the sale is reflected
as the sale occurred in the fourth quarter of 2010. In July 2010, the Company sold San Jose
MarketCenter, a 213,000 square foot retail center in San Jose, California.
The combined results of these properties operations and any gains or losses on sale are
included in Discontinued Operations in the Statements of Operations for all periods presented. The
components of these items for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as
follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Rental property revenues |
$ | 2,273 | $ | 2,538 | $ | 6,428 | $ | 11,222 | ||||||||
Other income |
| 11 | 88 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Rental property operating expenses |
(1,198 | ) | (1,216 | ) | (3,190 | ) | (4,440 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(478 | ) | (881 | ) | (1,973 | ) | (3,361 | ) | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 597 | $ | 452 | $ | 1,353 | $ | 3,451 | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of investment properties: |
||||||||||||||||
One Georgia Center |
$ | 2,821 | $ | | $ | 2,821 | $ | | ||||||||
Jefferson Mill Business Park Building A |
| | (394 | ) | | |||||||||||
San Jose MarketCenter |
| 6,572 | 10 | 6,572 | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,821 | $ | 6,572 | $ | 2,437 | $ | 6,572 | |||||||||
17
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. |
Overview:
Cousins Properties Incorporated (Cousins), a Georgia corporation, is a self-administered and
self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT). Cousins Real Estate Corporation (CREC) is a
taxable entity wholly-owned by and consolidated with Cousins. CREC owns, develops, and manages its
own real estate portfolio and performs certain real estate related services for other parties.
Cousins, CREC and their subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) develop, manage and own
office, retail, industrial and residential real estate projects. As of September 30, 2011, the
Companys portfolio of real estate assets consisted of interests in 7.0 million square feet of
office space, 4.8 million square feet of retail space, 1.5 million square feet of industrial space,
and two projects under development. The Company also had interests in both commercial and
residential land tracts held for investment or future development, as well as single-family lots in
residential projects. The Company also provides leasing and/or management services to
approximately 12.7 million square feet of office and retail space owned by third parties.
During the quarter, in its portfolio, the Company leased or renewed 420,000 square feet of
office space and 367,000 square feet of retail space in a still-challenged leasing environment.
While base rents for office space have deteriorated only marginally in the recent economic
downturn, concessions in the form of free rent and tenant allowances have increased significantly.
In the Atlanta market, rates and concessions have stabilized, but management does not believe that
there will be significant improvement until employment recovers. The Companys North Carolina
markets are mixed, as they are being negatively impacted by employment contraction in the banking
sector, but positively impacted by the regions exposure to the education, technology and health
services industries. The Companys Texas markets, by contrast, have experienced positive job
growth and lease absorption, resulting in a decrease in lease concessions and an increase in rental
rates. With respect to retail leasing, the Company experienced base rental rate erosion, an
increase in the number of leases paying percentage rent in lieu of base rent, and higher allowances
for tenant construction during the downturn. Recently, the Company has seen an improvement in
tenant sales and a modest increase in expansion plans by some national retailers. As a result,
terms for new leases executed in the current quarter were generally more traditional in nature as
they predominately included standard base rent clauses and tenant construction allowances more in
line with the structure of those seen prior to the downturn, although at lower rental rates.
Management expects this trend to carry forward provided consumer confidence and associated consumer
spending in each of its submarkets improves.
In the second quarter of 2011, the Company began constructing its first development project
since 2007 with the formation of a joint venture to develop Emory Point, the first phase of a
mixed-use project that is expected to contain 443 apartment units and 80,000 square feet of retail
space at a location adjacent to Emory University and the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta,
Georgia. In the third quarter of 2011, the Company began development of Mahan Village, a 147,000
square foot retail center in Tallahassee, Florida. The Company is actively pursuing other
development and acquisition opportunities in the Southeastern United States, one or more of which
could occur during the remainder of 2011.
In the third quarter of 2011, the Company sold One Georgia Center, a 376,000 square foot
office building in Atlanta, Georgia. Also, the Company, mainly through joint ventures in which it
has an ownership interest, sold 126 residential lots in the quarter, primarily in its Texas
projects. The Texas residential markets continue to outperform those in Georgia and Florida, and
management expects this trend to continue for the remainder of 2011.
Management currently plans to continue its strategy of selling its non-strategic land,
residential lot and industrial holdings and could sell one or more of its existing operating assets
in the remainder of 2011 in order to fund its investment activities.
Results of Operations:
Rental Property Revenues. Rental property revenues increased approximately $1.4
million (4%) and $3.5 million (3%) in the three and nine month 2011 periods compared to the same
2010 periods, respectively, due to:
| Increase of $487,000 and $457,000 in the three and nine month periods, respectively,
at Terminus 100 due in part to an increase in average economic occupancy from 94% for
the nine month 2010 period to 97% for the nine month 2011 period, to an increase in
parking revenues and to an increase in recoveries of certain operating expenses; |
18
Table of Contents
| Increase of $243,000 and $686,000 in the three and nine month periods, respectively,
at the American Cancer Society Center, as a result of an increase in average economic
occupancy from 85% for the nine month 2010 period to 90% for the nine month 2011
period; |
| Increase of $530,000 and $1.5 million in the three and nine month periods,
respectively, at The Avenue Forsyth, as a result of an increase in average economic
occupancy from 69% to 72%, and as a result of higher revenues from the elimination of
certain co-tenancy contingencies in the 2011 periods; and |
| Increase of $234,000 and $982,000 in the three and nine month periods, respectively,
at 191 Peachtree Tower, as a result of an increase in average economic occupancy from
73% for the 2010 nine month period to 76% for the nine month 2011 period, and due to an
increase in tenant recovery revenues relating to utility reimbursements and adjustments
of prior year expenses. |
Fee Income. The Company generates fee income generally through the leasing,
management and development of properties owned by joint ventures in which the Company has an
ownership interest and from certain other third party owners. Fee income decreased approximately
$57,000 (1%) and $509,000 (5%) in the three and nine month 2011 periods, respectively, compared to
the same 2010 periods. Within the Fee Income line item, leasing fees decreased $335,000 and
$652,000 in the three and nine month 2011 periods, respectively, mainly due to high levels of
leasing occurring at the MSREF/Terminus 200 LLC (MSREF/T200) venture during 2010, partially
offset by a fee received from the Ten Peachtree Place Associates venture in 2011. Management fees
were relatively unchanged between the three and nine month 2011 and 2010 periods. Development fees
increased approximately $276,000 and $376,000 for the three and nine month 2011 periods,
respectively, compared to the same 2010 periods, primarily the result of increased 2011 activity at
certain development projects and to an increase in the management of tenant build-out at
MSREF/T200.
Third Party Management and Leasing Revenues and Expenses. Third party management and
leasing revenues represent revenues and expense reimbursements from the Companys wholly-owned
subsidiary, Cousins Properties Services (CPS), which performs management and leasing for certain
third party owned office properties. These revenues increased approximately $674,000 (14%) and
$88,000 (1%) between the three and nine month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively. The increases
in the three and nine month periods are the result of higher leasing fees, although the increase in
the nine month period is partially offset by lower management fees. Leasing fees fluctuate based
on the rollover activity at the underlying individual properties and on the overall supply and
demand for leased office space within individual markets. Management fees fluctuate based on the
number and size of the properties within the CPS portfolio. The related expenses of CPS increased
approximately $119,000 (3%) in the three month 2011 period due mainly to higher leasing commission
expenses correlating to the activity in leasing fees. The expenses for CPS decreased approximately
$880,000 (7%) between the nine month 2011 and 2010 periods primarily as a result of the recognition
of bad debt expense of $466,000 in the 2010 period related to a management contract that was
prematurely terminated by a customer.
Other Income. Other income increased $203,000 and $977,000 between the three and nine
month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively, primarily due to an increase in termination fee income
between the periods.
Multi-family Residential Unit Sales and Cost of Sales. Multi-family residential unit
sales, net of cost of sales, decreased $1.4 million and $3.3 million between the three and nine
month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively. These decreases are due to the closing of 18 and 61
condominium units in the three and nine month 2010 periods, respectively, at the 10 Terminus Place
and 60 North Market projects. The Company did not close any condominiums in the three month 2011
period and closed five condominiums in the nine month 2011 period. There are no residential units
remaining for sale as of September 30, 2011.
Residential Lot and Outparcel Sales and Cost of Sales. Residential lot and outparcel
sales, net of cost of sales, decreased approximately $4.7 million between the nine month 2011 and
2010 periods because there were no outparcel sales in 2011, compared to eight in 2010.
19
Table of Contents
General and Administrative Expense (G&A). G&A expense decreased approximately $1.9
million (30%) and $3.1 million (15%) between the three and nine month 2011 and 2010 periods,
respectively, primarily as a result of the following:
| Decrease in employee salaries and benefits, other than stock-based compensation, of
approximately $612,000 and $1.2 million between the three and nine month 2011 and 2010
periods, respectively, primarily due to a decrease in the number of Company employees and
a change in the Companys employee retirement plan funding; |
| Decrease in expense related to stock-based compensation of approximately $1.3 million
and $1.1 million between the three and nine month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively,
primarily due to a decrease in the valuation of stock-based awards, resulting mainly from
a drop in the Companys stock price between the periods; |
| Decrease in employee salaries and benefits resulting from higher capitalized
personnel costs of approximately $246,000 between the nine month 2011 and 2010 periods.
The Company capitalizes salaries and benefits of personnel who work on qualified
development projects or on leases that have been either executed or are probable of being
executed. There were lower capitalized salaries of $468,000 in the three month 2011
period compared to the same 2010 period. The amount of probable development projects and
the number of leases executed fluctuates from period to period, and therefore, the amounts
capitalized change; |
| Increase of $347,000 between the nine month 2011 and 2010 periods in board of
directors expenses, mainly due to a change in director compensation in 2011 (there was no
significant three month change); and |
| Decrease of $73,000 and $233,000 in the three and nine month periods, respectively,
due to a decrease in professional fees. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased approximately $2.1 million (24%) and
$7.1 million (25%) in the three and nine month 2011 periods compared to the same 2010 periods,
respectively. This decrease is partially due to lower average debt outstanding of approximately
$17 million and $61 million in the three and nine month 2011 periods, respectively. Overall, debt
was reduced using proceeds from multi-family residential unit and operating property sales in 2010
and 2011. In addition, interest expense decreased as a result of the termination of two interest
rates swaps in 2010 which had effectively fixed certain variable-rate debt at a rate higher than
the variable rate paid in 2011, and from the Terminus 100 mortgage note payable, which was
refinanced in 2010 at a lower interest rate and a $40.0 million reduction in principal.
Other Expense. Other expense decreased approximately $119,000 (13%) and $2.4 million
(51%) in the three and nine month 2011 periods compared to the same 2010 periods, respectively. In
the nine month 2010 period, the Company recognized expense of approximately $1.9 million related to
the abandonment of a predevelopment project. No predevelopment projects were similarly written off
in 2011. Additionally, the Company incurred approximately $860,000 more in property taxes and
other holding costs related to its developed and unsold multi-family residential projects in the
nine month 2010 period.
Impairment Loss. In the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded an impairment
loss of $3.5 million on its investment in Verde Realty, a cost method investment. In the second
quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $586,000 related to its 60 North Market
condominium project.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased approximately
$224,000 (2%) and $784,000 (2%) in the three and nine month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively,
primarily due to accelerated amortization in 2010 of tenant assets for retail tenants who
terminated their leases prior to the originally scheduled end date. Partially offsetting this
decrease was an increase in depreciation expense during 2011 at several properties due to increased
occupancy and an increase in depreciation expense at 555 North Point Center East, as a tenant
terminated its lease early and the amortization of the related tenant improvements was accelerated.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt and Interest Rate Swaps. In 2010, the Company repaid a
$100 million term facility and terminated a related interest rate swap, resulting in a $9.2 million
payment to the swaps counterparty. In addition, in 2010 the Company modified its Credit Facility
and, as a result, charged $592,000 of unamortized loan closing costs to expense. In 2011, the
Company prepaid the Lakeshore Park Plaza mortgage note and as a result, charged $74,000 of
unamortized loan closing costs to expense.
20
Table of Contents
Benefit for Income Taxes from Operations. Benefit for income taxes from operations
decreased $890,000 between the nine month 2011 and 2010 periods, and there was no significant
change in the three month periods. In 2010, the Company recognized a tax benefit for certain net
operating loss carrybacks, with no corresponding benefit in the 2011 period.
Income from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Income from unconsolidated joint ventures
increased approximately $481,000 (22%) and decreased $25,000 in the three and nine month 2011
periods compared to the same 2010 periods, respectively, due to the following (all amounts
discussed reflect the Companys share of joint venture income based on its ownership interest in
each joint venture):
| Decrease in income from Temco Associates, LLC (Temco) of approximately $597,000
between the nine month 2011 and 2010 periods primarily due to receipt of additional
proceeds in 2010 from a property sold in a prior year, as well as a reduction in real
estate tax expense recognized during 2010. There were no significant changes in income
from Temco between the three month 2011 and 2010 periods; |
| Decrease in income from CL Realty, L.L.C. of $654,000 between the nine month 2011 and
2010 periods, as a result of a $250,000 impairment charge recognized in 2011, a decrease
in oil and gas revenues and a decrease in net profits from lot sales. There were no
significant changes in income from CL Realty, L.L.C. between the three month 2011 and 2010
periods; |
| Decrease in income of approximately $356,000 between the nine month 2011 and 2010
periods from CF Murfreesboro Associates, mainly due to the amendment of this ventures
construction facility in June 2010 at a higher interest rate; |
| Increase in loss of approximately $418,000 between the nine month 2011 and 2010
periods from MSREF/T200 as this venture was formed in the second quarter of 2010; |
| Increase in income of approximately $612,000 and $1.8 million in the three and nine
month 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively, from Cousins Watkins LLC, as this joint venture
was formed at the end of 2010; and |
| Increase in income of approximately $165,000 and $481,000 in the three and nine month
2011 and 2010 periods, respectively, from Palisades West LLC, as the average economic
occupancy at the office buildings owned by this joint venture increased from 92% in the
nine month 2010 period to 97% for the nine month 2011 period. |
Gain on Sale of Investment Properties. Gain on sale of investment properties
(excluding discontinued operations) decreased $1.7 million between the nine month 2011 and 2010
periods, and did not change between the three month 2011 and 2010 periods. The Company sold
Glenmore Garden Villas, a townhome project in Charlotte, North Carolina, and three land tracts in
the nine month 2010 period. There were no investment property sales, other than those which
qualified as discontinued operations, in the 2011 periods.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations. In September 2011, the Company sold One
Georgia Center, a 376,000 square foot office building in Atlanta, Georgia, for a sales price of
$48.6 million, which corresponded to a capitalization rate of approximately 8%. In February 2011,
the Company sold Jefferson Mill Business Park Building A, a 459,000 square foot industrial property
in suburban Atlanta, Georgia, for a sales price of $22.0 million and a capitalization rate of
approximately 7%. In 2010, the Company sold San Jose MarketCenter, a 213,000 square foot retail
center in San Jose, California for a sales price of $85.0 million and a capitalization rate of
approximately 8%, and sold 8995 Westside Parkway, a 51,000 square foot office building in suburban
Atlanta, Georgia for $3.2 million. The capitalization rate of 8995 Westside Parkway was not a
significant determinant of the sales price because this building had no leases at the time of sale.
Capitalization rates are generally calculated by dividing projected annualized cash flows by the
sales price. The number, size and timing of the asset sales which qualify as discontinued
operations change from period to period, causing the fluctuation of the amounts in discontinued
operations.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The Company consolidates certain
entities and allocates the partners share of those entities results to Net Income Attributable to
Noncontrolling Interests on the Statement of Operations. The noncontrolling interests share of
the Companys net income increased $1.5 million and $1.6 million in the three and nine month 2011
periods, respectively, compared to the same 2010 periods. In the third quarter of 2011,
approximately $1.6 million of the gain on sale from the One Georgia
Center sale was allocated to the noncontrolling partner in the entity which owned the
property, causing the increase.
21
Table of Contents
Funds From Operations. The table below shows Funds from Operations Available to Common
Stockholders (FFO) and the related reconciliation to net income (loss) available to common
stockholders for the Company. The Company calculates FFO in accordance with the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) definition, which is net income available
to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding extraordinary items,
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and gains or losses from sales of depreciable
property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis.
FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental measure of a REITs operating
performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of
real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have
historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have
considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost
accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of
REIT operating performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among other items, from GAAP
net income. The use of FFO, combined with the required primary GAAP presentations, has been
fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding of operating results of REITs among the
investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. Company
management evaluates operating performance in part based on FFO. Additionally, the Company uses
FFO, along with other measures, to assess performance in connection with evaluating and granting
incentive compensation to its officers and other key employees. The reconciliation of net income
(loss) available to common stockholders to FFO is as follows for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except per share information):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders |
$ | 188 | $ | (8,382 | ) | $ | (12,375 | ) | $ | (18,550 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated properties |
12,891 | 13,115 | 38,310 | 39,094 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued properties |
478 | 881 | 1,973 | 3,361 | ||||||||||||
Share of unconsolidated joint ventures |
2,444 | 2,349 | 7,790 | 7,097 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated properties |
(388 | ) | (441 | ) | (1,323 | ) | (1,470 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued properties |
| | | (5 | ) | |||||||||||
Share of unconsolidated joint ventures |
(5 | ) | (5 | ) | (15 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sale of investment properties: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
(59 | ) | (58 | ) | (177 | ) | (1,875 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued properties, net of noncontrolling interest |
(1,240 | ) | (6,572 | ) | (856 | ) | (6,572 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of undepreciated investment properties |
| (1 | ) | | 1,698 | |||||||||||
Funds From Operations Available to Common Stockholders |
$ | 14,309 | $ | 886 | $ | 33,327 | $ | 22,761 | ||||||||
Per Common Share Basic and Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available |
$ | .00 | $ | (.08 | ) | $ | (.12 | ) | $ | (.18 | ) | |||||
Funds From Operations |
$ | .14 | $ | .01 | $ | .32 | $ | .23 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Basic |
103,715 | 101,893 | 103,631 | 100,995 | ||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Diluted |
103,718 | 101,893 | 103,642 | 100,995 | ||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
The Companys primary liquidity sources are:
| Cash from operations; |
||
| Borrowings under its Credit Facility; |
||
| Mortgage notes payable; |
||
| Proceeds from common and preferred equity offerings; |
||
| Joint venture formations; and |
||
| Sales of assets. |
The Companys primary liquidity uses are:
| Corporate expenses; |
||
| Expenditures on predevelopment and development projects; |
||
| Payments of tenant improvements and other leasing costs; |
||
| Principal and interest payments on debt obligations; |
||
| Dividends to common and preferred stockholders; and |
||
| Property investments. |
Financial Condition
During 2010 and 2011, the Company improved its financial position by reducing leverage,
extending maturities, replacing higher cost mortgage notes with lower cost financing and modifying
the credit facility, all of which increased overall financial flexibility. The Company has no debt
maturities for the remainder of 2011. The Company expects to fund its debt maturities and other
commitments over the next 12 months with cash flows from operations, borrowings under its Credit
Facility, borrowings under new or renewed mortgage loans and proceeds from the sale of assets. The
Company also anticipates entering into a new credit facility prior to the maturity date of its
existing Credit Facility, and may also seek additional capital to fund its activities, which could
include joint venture equity from third parties and/or the issuance of common or preferred equity.
If opportunities arise, the Company may acquire operating, development or redevelopment
projects in the remainder of 2011, or make other investments. The Company currently has
commitments under existing leases to fund tenant improvements and anticipates additional tenant
costs in 2011 based on lease-up expectations, which would increase the use of cash.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
At September 30, 2011, the Company was subject to the following contractual obligations and
commitments (in thousands):
Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Company debt: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured
Credit Facility and construction loan |
$ | 119,801 | $ | 119,800 | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable |
342,333 | 28,828 | 9,524 | 24,039 | 279,942 | |||||||||||||||
Interest commitments (1) |
145,023 | 22,204 | 36,353 | 34,634 | 51,832 | |||||||||||||||
Ground leases |
14,895 | 101 | 209 | 221 | 14,364 | |||||||||||||||
Other operating leases |
1,359 | 619 | 545 | 146 | 49 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 623,411 | $ | 171,552 | $ | 46,632 | $ | 59,040 | $ | 346,187 | ||||||||||
Commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated development commitments |
$ | 15,901 | $ | 15,217 | $ | 612 | $ | 72 | $ | | ||||||||||
Unfunded tenant improvements and other |
15,612 | 15,262 | 350 | | | |||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
2,105 | 2,105 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Performance bonds |
935 | 921 | 14 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total commitments |
$ | 34,553 | $ | 33,505 | $ | 976 | $ | 72 | $ | | ||||||||||
(1) | Interest on variable rate obligations is based on rates effective as of September 30, 2011. |
23
Table of Contents
In addition, the Company has several standing or renewable service contracts mainly
related to the operation of buildings. These contracts are in the ordinary course of business and
are generally one year or less. These contracts are not included in the above table and are
usually reimbursed in whole or in part by tenants.
Other Debt Information
The real estate and other assets of The American Cancer Society Center (the ACS Center) are
restricted under the ACS Center loan agreement in that they are not available to settle debts of
the Company. However, provided that the ACS Center loan has not incurred any uncured event of
default, as defined in the loan agreement, the cash flows from the ACS Center, after payments of
debt service, operating expenses and reserves, are available for distribution to the Company.
The Companys Credit Facility bears interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
plus a spread, based on the Companys leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility. At
September 30, 2011, the spread over LIBOR under the Credit Facility was 2.0%. The amount that the
Company may draw under the Credit Facility is a defined calculation based on the Companys
unencumbered assets and other factors. Total borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was $350
million at September 30, 2011. In August 2011, the Company exercised the one-year extension option
under the Credit Facility, which changed the maturity date to August 29, 2012.
On June 28, 2011, EP I LLC (EP I) was formed between the Company, with a 75% ownership
interest, and Lion Gables Realty Limited Partnership (Gables), with a 25% ownership interest, for
the purpose of developing and operating Emory Point, the first phase of a mixed-used property in
Atlanta, Georgia. Upon formation, EP I entered into a construction loan agreement, secured by the
project, to provide for up to $61.1 million to fund construction. The venture may select from two
interest rate options, as defined in the loan agreement, which are based on floating-rate indices
plus a spread. At September 30, 2011, the interest rate on the loan was 2.09%. The loan matures
June 28, 2014 and may be extended for two, one-year periods if certain conditions are met. The
Company and Gables will guarantee up to approximately $11.5 million and $3.8 million of the
construction loan, respectively. These guarantees may be eliminated after project completion,
based on certain covenants.
On September 12, 2011, the Company, formed Mahan Village LLC (Mahan), a consolidated entity
where a partner has a noncontrolling interest, to construct Mahan Village, a 147,000 square foot
retail center in Tallahassee, Florida. Mahan entered into a construction loan agreement, secured
by the project, to provide for up to approximately $15.0 million to fund construction. The debt
contains two interest rate options, as defined in the loan agreement, which are based on
floating-rate indices plus a spread. The loan matures September 12, 2014, and may be extended for
two, one-year periods if certain conditions are met. The Company guarantees up to 25% of the
construction loan, which may be eliminated after project completion, based on certain covenants.
On June 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the 333/555 North Point Center East
mortgage note. On July 1, 2011, the Company prepaid, without penalty, the Lakeshore Park Plaza
mortgage note. On August 10, 2011, the Company repaid in full the 600 University Park Place
mortgage note upon its maturity.
The Company was released of its obligation under the Handy Road Associates, LLC mortgage note
through foreclosure in May 2011.
Future Capital Requirements
The Companys mortgage debt is primarily non-recourse, fixed-rate mortgage notes secured by
various real estate assets. Some of the Companys non-recourse mortgages contain covenants which,
if not satisfied, could result in acceleration of the maturity of the debt. The Company generally
expects that it will either refinance the non-recourse mortgages at maturity or repay the mortgages
with proceeds from other financings. As of September 30, 2011, the weighted average interest rate
on the Companys consolidated debt was 4.89%, and the Companys consolidated debt to total market
capitalization ratio was 37.4%.
The Company expects operations and/or sales of assets and amounts available under the Credit
Facility to be the primary funding sources for current contractual obligations and commitments.
The Company may also
fund its commitments by obtaining long-term mortgage debt on some of its unencumbered assets,
to the extent available and with acceptable terms, or by forming new joint ventures.
24
Table of Contents
The Company may generate capital through the issuance of securities that include common or
preferred stock, warrants, debt securities or depositary shares. The Company has an active shelf
registration statement which allows for the issuance of up to $500 million of such securities, of
which $482 million remains to be drawn as of September 30, 2011. Management will continue to
evaluate all public equity sources and select the most appropriate options as capital is required.
The Company may raise or recycle capital to meet obligations. If one or more sources of
capital are not available when required, the Company may be forced to reduce the number of projects
it acquires or develops and/or raise capital on potentially unfavorable terms, or may be unable to
raise capital, which could have an adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
Cash Flows
The reasons for significant increases and decreases in cash flows between the periods are as
follows:
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Cash flows from operating activities decreased
approximately $22.9 million between the nine month 2011 period and the corresponding 2010 period
due to the following:
| Cash flows decreased $18.4 million from multi-family unit sales, due to a decrease in
the number of units sold at both the Companys 10 Terminus and 60 North Market condominium
projects. There are no multi-family units for sale as of September 30, 2011; |
| Cash flows decreased $930,000 from residential lot sales due to a decrease in the number
of lots sold between the periods; |
| Cash flows decreased $12.4 million in net proceeds from outparcel sales. There were no
outparcel sales in 2011, compared to eight outparcel sales in 2010; |
| Cash flows decreased $2.9 million from a decrease in income taxes refunded between the
periods; |
| Cash flows decreased $4.7 million for incentive compensation awards. In 2011, $4.7
million of cash incentive compensation awards were paid compared to none in 2010; |
| Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase of $7.4 million due to a reduction
in interest paid as a result of lower average borrowings outstanding in 2011; and |
| Cash flows also increased $9.2 million as a result of the payment of a fee for the
interest rate swap termination in the 2010 period, which further offset these decreases. |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash provided by investing activities decreased
approximately $1.1 million between the nine month 2011 period and the corresponding 2010 period,
due to the following:
| Cash flows decreased $29.1 million from proceeds from the sale of investment properties.
In 2011, the Company sold One Georgia Center and Jefferson Mill for net proceeds of
approximately $48.2 million and $21.4 million, respectively. In 2010, the Company sold San
Jose MarketCenter, Glenmore Garden Villas and three tracts of land for net proceeds of
approximately $98.7 million; |
| Cash flows decreased $8.3 million due to an increase in property acquisition and
development and tenant asset expenditures, mainly due to the commencement of construction
of the Mahan Village project in the third quarter 2011; |
| Cash flows decreased $5.5 million from contributions to joint ventures, mainly related
to $11.0 million contributed to the EP I joint venture that was formed in the second
quarter of 2011. In the 2010 period, the Company contributed $4.0 million to the CP
Venture IV entities for its share of a maturing note payable, and contributed $2.7 million
for the formation of the MSREF/T200 joint venture; |
| Cash flows increased $17.3 million due to the payment of a debt guarantee in 2010
related to the old Terminus 200 LLC joint venture; and |
| Cash flows increased $24.0 million from restricted cash. Under the loan agreement for
The ACS Center, reserves are required for future tenant improvement costs. In the 2010
period, the Company
funded approximately $11.9 million of these reserves. In the 2011 period, $10.0 million of
these funds were released for the payment of tenant improvement costs under new leases. |
25
Table of Contents
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities decreased
approximately $22.2 million between the nine month 2011 period and the corresponding 2010 period,
due to the following:
| Cash flows increased $84.8 million between 2011 and 2010 from net proceeds from the
Credit Facility. In the 2010 period, the Company repaid the $100 million Term Facility
mainly using proceeds from the sale of San Jose MarketCenter, offset by additional
borrowings to pay the fee on the interest rate swap termination and the payment of the
Terminus 200 LLC debt guarantee. In the 2011 period, the Company borrowed approximately
$56.2 million to prepay the 333/555 North Point Center East, the Lakeshore Park Plaza and
the 600 University Park Place mortgage notes. Offsetting these borrowings were repayments
in the 2011 period with the proceeds from property sales; |
| Cash flows decreased $25.9 million from the repayment of notes payable. In 2011, the
Company prepaid the 333/555 North Point Center East mortgage note for $26.4 million, the
Lakeshore Park Plaza mortgage note for $17.5 million and the 600 University Park Place
mortgage note for $12.3 million. In 2010, the Company prepaid the Meridian Mark Plaza
mortgage note for $22.0 million and repaid the $8.7 million Glenmore Garden Villas note in
conjunction with its sale; |
| Cash flows decreased $27.0 million from the proceeds of other notes payable due to the
issuance of a new mortgage note at Meridian Mark Plaza in the 2010 period; |
| Cash flows decreased $4.9 million from common dividends paid. The 2011 quarterly
dividends were $0.045 per share paid all in cash. The 2010 quarterly dividends were $0.09
per share paid in a combination of cash and stock; and |
| Cash flows decreased $5.3 million from distributions to noncontrolling interests, as the
Company distributed approximately $5.1 million to the partner in Jefferson Mill for its
share of proceeds from the sale. |
Capital Expenditures. The Company incurs costs related to its real estate assets that include
acquisition of undeveloped land, development and construction, redevelopment of existing
properties, leasing costs for tenants, and ongoing property repairs and maintenance. In addition,
the Company may purchase existing operating properties.
Capital expenditures for certain types of real estate are categorized as operating activities
in the Statements of Cash Flows, such as those for the development of residential lots, retail
outparcels and for-sale multi-family residential projects. During the nine months ended September
30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $818,000 and $1.7 million, respectively, in residential
project expenditures. The Company does not anticipate entering into any new residential or
for-sale, multi-family projects in the near term, and upcoming expenditures are anticipated to be
used to complete current projects in inventory.
Capital expenditures for other types of real estate, mainly office and retail assets the
Company develops, holds and operates, are included in property acquisition and development and
tenant asset expenditures as an investing activity in the Statements of Cash Flows. Amounts
accrued are removed from the table below to show the components of these costs on a cash basis.
These costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Development |
$ | 8,235 | $ | | ||||
Redevelopment building improvements |
5,017 | 3,838 | ||||||
Redevelopment leasing costs |
3,078 | 4,890 | ||||||
Operating building improvements |
708 | 2,265 | ||||||
Operating leasing costs |
15,701 | 16,009 | ||||||
Capitalized interest |
19 | | ||||||
Capitalized salaries |
1,002 | 1,256 | ||||||
Accrued capital adjustment |
940 | (1,903 | ) | |||||
Total property acquisition and development
expenditures |
$ | 34,700 | $ | 26,355 | ||||
26
Table of Contents
Capital expenditures increased in 2011 mainly due to the commencement of construction in
the third quarter of 2011 of the Mahan Village project. Tenant improvements and leasing costs as
well as capitalized personnel costs are a function of the number and size of newly executed leases
or renewals of existing leases. The amount of tenant improvement and leasing costs on a per square
foot basis varies by lease and by market. Tenant improvement and leasing costs per square foot
have increased during recent periods, but amounts have stabilized overall and are decreasing in
some of the Companys markets. Given the level of expected leasing and renewal activity, in future
periods, management expects tenant improvements and leasing costs to remain consistent with or
greater than that experienced in the first nine months of 2011.
Dividends. The Company paid cash common and preferred dividends of $23.7 million and $18.8
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which it funded
with cash provided by operating activities. The 2011 common stock dividends were paid all in cash,
and the 2010 common stock dividends were paid in a combination of cash and common stock. The total
value of the common dividends paid in the 2010 period totaled $27.2 million. The Company currently
intends to pay future dividends in cash, and expects to fund its quarterly distributions to common
and preferred stockholders with cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from investment
property sales, distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures, and indebtedness, if necessary.
The Company reviews, on a quarterly basis, the amount of the common dividend in light of
current and projected future cash flows from the sources noted above and also considers the
requirements needed to maintain its REIT status. In addition, the Company has certain covenants
under its Credit Facility which could limit the amount of dividends paid. In general, dividends of
any amount can be paid as long as leverage, as defined in the facility, is less than 55%, and the
Company is not in default under its facility. Certain conditions also apply in which the Company
can still pay dividends if leverage is above that amount. The Company routinely monitors the
status of its dividend payments in light of the Credit Facility covenants.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
General. The Company has a number of off balance sheet joint ventures with varying
structures, as described in Note 4 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Most of the joint
ventures in which the Company has an interest are involved in the ownership, acquisition and/or
development of real estate. A venture will fund capital requirements or operational needs with
cash from operations or financing proceeds, if possible. If additional capital is deemed
necessary, a venture may request a contribution from the partners, and the Company will evaluate
such request. In particular, the Company anticipates approximately $16.7 million in additional
equity to fund project construction of the first phase at the EP I joint venture. Additionally, in
July 2011, a large lease was signed at Ten Peachtree Place Associates, and the Company estimates
contributions of approximately $6.3 million will be needed to fund tenant asset costs in this
venture. Except as previously discussed, based on the nature of the activities conducted in these
ventures, management cannot estimate with any degree of accuracy amounts that the Company may be
required to fund in the short or long-term. However, management does not believe that additional
funding of these ventures will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results
of operations.
Debt. At September 30, 2011, the Companys share of unconsolidated joint venture debt to
third parties was approximately $162.0 million. These loans are generally mortgage or construction
loans, most of which are non-recourse to the Company, except as described in the paragraph below.
In addition, in certain instances, the Company provides non-recourse carve-out guarantees on
these non-recourse loans. Certain of these loans have variable interest rates, which creates
exposure to the ventures in the form of market risk to interest rate changes. At September 30,
2011, approximately $29.1 million of the loans at unconsolidated joint ventures were recourse to
the Company.
CF Murfreesboro Associates (CF Murfreesboro), of which the Company owns 50%, has a $113.2
million facility that matures on July 20, 2013, and $99.8 million was drawn at September 30, 2011.
The Company has a $26.2 million repayment guarantee on the loan.
The Company guarantees 25% of two of the four outstanding loans at the Cousins Watkins LLC
joint venture, which owns four retail shopping centers. The loans have a total capacity of $16.3
million, of which the Company guarantees $4.1 million. At September 30, 2011, the Company
guaranteed $2.9 million, based on current amounts outstanding under these loans.
The Company guarantees repayment of 18.75% of the outstanding balance of the EP I construction
loan, which has a maximum available of $61.1 million, equaling a total guarantee of approximately
$11.5 million.
This guarantee may be eliminated after project completion, based on certain covenants. The
amount outstanding under this loan is minimal as of September 30, 2011.
27
Table of Contents
Bonds. The unconsolidated joint ventures also had performance bonds of $426,000 at September
30, 2011, which the Company guarantees through an indemnity agreement with the bond issuer. These
performance bonds relate to construction projects at the retail center owned by CF Murfreesboro.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes in the Companys critical accounting policies from those
disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
There have been no material changes in the market risk associated with the Companys notes
payable at September 30, 2011 compared to that as disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls
and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding
managements control objectives. We also have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. As
we do not always control or manage these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with
respect to such entities are necessarily more limited than those we maintain with respect to our
consolidated subsidiaries.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer along
with the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness, design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon the
foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective. In addition, based on such evaluation we have
identified no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and administrative proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability
insurance. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any
potential loss relating to these matters using the latest information available. The Company
records a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss or
range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is probable and a reasonable
estimate of the loss is a range, the Company accrues the best estimate within the range. If no
amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the Company accrues the minimum
amount within the range. If an unfavorable outcome is probable but the amount of the loss cannot
be reasonably estimated, the Company discloses the nature of the litigation and indicates that an
estimate of the loss or range of loss cannot be made. If an unfavorable outcome is reasonably
possible and the estimated loss is material, the Company discloses the nature and estimate of the
possible loss of the litigation. The Company does not disclose information with respect to
litigation where an unfavorable outcome is considered to be remote. Based on current expectations,
such matters, both individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the liquidity, results of operations, business or financial condition of the Company.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
There has been no material change in the Companys risk factors from those outlined in Item 1A
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
For information on the Companys equity compensation plans, see Note 6 of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
On May 6, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a common stock repurchase
plan of up to 5,000,000 shares, which was in effect through May 9, 2011. The Company repurchased
878,500 shares under this plan. In total, under all repurchase plans, the Company has repurchased
3,570,082 shares of common stock at an average price of $24.32. On November 10, 2008, the common
stock repurchase plan was expanded to include authorization to repurchase up to $20 million of
preferred shares. This program was expanded on November 18, 2008 to include all 4,000,000 shares
of both of the Companys Series A and Series B Preferred Stock (totaling 8,000,000 shares). The
Company has repurchased 1,215,090 preferred shares under this plan at an average price of $12.99.
The repurchase plan expired on May 9, 2011 and was not extended or replaced. During the third
quarter of 2011, the Company did not repurchase any common or preferred shares.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
None.
Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved). |
Item 5. | Other Information. |
None.
29
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
3.1 | Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
August 9, 1999, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|||
3.1.1 | Articles of Amendment to Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended July 22, 2003, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2003, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|||
3.1.2 | Articles of Amendment to Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended December 15, 2004, filed as Exhibit 3(a)(i) to the
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and incorporated herein
by reference. |
|||
3.1.3 | Articles of Amendment to Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended May 4, 2010, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 6, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|||
3.2 | Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated June 6, 2009, filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2009, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|||
11 | Computation of Per Share Earnings* |
|||
31.1 | ** | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
31.2 | ** | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.1 | ** | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.2 | ** | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
101 | ** | The following financial information for the Registrant, formatted in XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows, and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Statements, tagged as blocks of
text. |
* | Data required by ASC 260, Earnings per Share, is provided in Note 3 to the
Condensed Consolidated financial statements included in this report. |
|
** | Filed herewith |
30
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED |
||||
/s/ Gregg D. Adzema | ||||
Gregg D. Adzema | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
November 2, 2011
31