CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

For the fiscal year ended November 24, 2007

Commission file number: 000-24049

CRA International, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer o                         Accelerated filer ý                        Non-accelerated filer o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

         The aggregate market value of the stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of May 11, 2007, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (based on the closing sale price of $51.93 as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market as of that date) was approximately $570.8 million. Outstanding shares of common stock beneficially owned by executive officers and directors of the registrant and certain related entities have been excluded from this computation because these persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The fact that these persons have been deemed affiliates for purposes of this computation should not be considered a conclusive determination for any other purpose.

         As of January 30, 2008, CRA had outstanding 11,018,348 shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

         The information required for Part III of this annual report is incorporated by reference from the registrant's definitive proxy statement for its 2008 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year ended November 24, 2007.

CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 24, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1—Business

Forward-Looking Statements

        Except for historical facts, the statements in this annual report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are merely our current predictions of future events. These statements are inherently uncertain, and actual events could differ materially from our predictions. Important factors that could cause actual events to vary from our predictions include those discussed in this annual report under the heading "Risk Factors." We assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements to reflect new information or developments. We urge readers to review carefully the risk factors described in this annual report and in the other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can read these documents at www.sec.gov.

Additional Available Information

        Our principal Internet address is www.crai.com. Our website provides a link to a third-party website through which our annual, quarterly, and current reports, and amendments to those reports, are available free of charge. We believe these reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC. We do not maintain or provide any information directly to the third-party website, and we do not check its accuracy.

        Our website also includes information about our corporate governance practices. The Investor Relations page of our website provides a link to a web page where you can obtain a copy of our code of ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer.

Introduction

        We are a worldwide leading economic, financial, and management consulting services firm that applies advanced analytic techniques and in-depth industry knowledge to complex engagements for a broad range of clients. Founded in 1965, we work with businesses, law firms, accounting firms, and governments in providing original, authoritative advice and a wide range of services around the world. We combine economic and financial analysis with expertise in litigation and regulatory support, business strategy and planning, market and demand forecasting, policy analysis, and engineering and technology strategy. We are often retained in high-stakes matters, such as multibillion-dollar mergers and acquisitions, new product introductions, major strategy and capital investment decisions, and complex litigation, the outcomes of which often have significant consequences for the parties involved. These matters often require independent analysis, and as a result companies must rely on outside experts. Companies turn to us because we can provide large teams of highly credentialed and experienced economic and finance experts to address complex, high-stakes matters.

        We provide our services primarily through our highly credentialed and experienced staff of employee consultants. As of November 24, 2007, we employed 771 consultants, including approximately 156 employee consultants with doctorates and approximately 280 employee consultants with other advanced degrees. Our employee consultants have backgrounds in a wide range of disciplines, including economics, business, corporate finance, materials sciences, and engineering. We are extremely selective in our hiring of consultants, recruiting from leading universities, industry, and government. Many of our employee consultants are nationally or internationally recognized as experts in their respective fields and have published scholarly articles, lectured extensively, and have been quoted in the press. To enhance the expertise we provide to our clients, we maintain close working relationships with a select group of renowned academic and industry non-employee experts.

        Our business is diversified across multiple dimensions, including service offerings, vertical industry coverage, areas of functional expertise, client base, and geography. Through 26 offices located around the world, we provide multiple services across 25 areas of functional expertise to hundreds of clients

1

across 18 vertical industries. We believe this diversification reduces our dependence on any particular market, industry, or geographic area.

        During fiscal 2007, we started operating under three platforms: (i) finance, (ii) litigation and applied economics, and (iii) business consulting. In our finance platform, we provide consulting services to corporate clients and attorneys in a wide range of litigation and regulatory proceedings, providing high-quality research and analysis, expert testimony, and comprehensive support in litigation and regulatory proceedings in all areas of finance, accounting, financial economics, risk management, insurance, and forensic accounting and investigations. In our litigation and applied economics platform, we use our expertise in economics, finance, and business to offer law firms, businesses, and government agencies services such as class certification, damages analysis, expert reports and testimony, regulatory analysis, strategy development, valuation of tangible and intangible assets, risk management, and transaction support. In our business consulting platform, we use our expertise in economics, finance, and business analysis to offer our clients such services as strategy development, performance improvement, corporate portfolio analysis, estimation of market demand, new product pricing strategies, valuation of intellectual property and other assets, assessment of competitors' actions, and analysis of new sources of supply.

        Our analytical expertise in advanced economic and financial methods is complemented by our in-depth expertise in specific industries, including aerospace and defense; banking and capital markets; capital projects; chemicals; energy and utilities; financial services; healthcare; insurance; manufacturing; media; mining, metals and materials; oil and gas; pharmaceuticals; real estate; retail; sports; telecommunications; and transportation.

        We have completed thousands of engagements for clients around the world, including domestic and foreign companies; federal, state, and local domestic government agencies; governments of foreign countries; public and private utilities; and national and international trade associations. Our clients come from a broad range of industries, with our top 10 clients in fiscal 2007 accounting for approximately 19% of our revenues and no single client accounting for more than 5% of our revenues. We also work with many of the world's leading law firms. We experience a high level of repeat business; in fiscal 2007, approximately 89% of our revenues resulted from either ongoing engagements or new engagements for existing clients.

        We deliver our services through a global network of 26 coordinated offices located domestically in Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts; Chicago, Illinois; New York, New York; Austin, College Station, Dallas, and Houston, Texas; Oakland, Palo Alto, and Pasadena, California; Atlanta, Georgia; Tallahassee, Florida; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Washington, D.C., and internationally in Brussels, Belgium; Manama, Bahrain; Hong Kong, China; London, United Kingdom; Melbourne, Canberra and Sydney, Australia; Toronto, Canada; Hamburg, Germany; and Wellington, New Zealand.

Industry Overview

        Businesses are operating in an increasingly complex environment. Technology has provided companies with almost instantaneous access to a wide range of internal information such as supply costs, inventory values, and sales and pricing data, as well as external information such as market demand forecasts and customer buying patterns. The Internet has changed traditional distribution channels, thereby eliminating barriers to entry in many industries and spurring new competition. At the same time, markets are becoming increasingly global, offering companies the opportunity to expand their presence throughout the world and exposing them to increased competition and the uncertainties of foreign operations. Many industries are consolidating as companies pursue mergers and acquisitions in response to an increase in competitive pressures and to expand their market opportunities. In addition, companies are increasingly relying on technological and business innovations to improve efficiency, thus increasing the importance of strategically analyzing their businesses and developing and protecting new technology. As a result of this increasingly competitive and complex business

2

environment, companies must constantly gather, analyze, and use available information to enhance their business strategies and operational efficiencies.

        The increasing complexity and changing nature of the business environment are also forcing governments to modify their regulatory strategies. For example, industries such as healthcare are subject to frequently changing regulations, and other industries, such as telecommunications and electric power, have been significantly impacted by deregulation. Similarly, numerous high-profile corporate misdeeds led to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which significantly enhanced the financial disclosure requirements applicable to public companies. These constant changes in the regulatory environment have led to frequent litigation and interaction with government agencies as companies attempt to interpret and react to the implications of this changing environment. Furthermore, as the general business and regulatory environment becomes more complex, corporate litigation has also become more complicated, protracted, expensive, and important to the parties involved.

        As a result, companies are increasingly relying on sophisticated economic and financial analysis to solve complex problems and improve decision-making. Economic and financial models provide the tools necessary to analyze a variety of issues confronting businesses, such as interpretation of sales data, effects of price changes, valuation of assets, assessment of competitors' activities, evaluation of new products, and analysis of supply limitations. Governments are also relying, to an increasing extent, on economic and finance theory to measure the effects of anticompetitive activity, evaluate mergers and acquisitions, change regulations, implement auctions to allocate resources, and establish transfer pricing rules. Finally, litigants and law firms are using economic and finance theory to help determine liability and to calculate damages in complex and high-stakes litigation. As the need for complex economic and financial analysis becomes more widespread, companies and governments are turning to outside consultants for access to the specialized expertise, experience, and prestige that are not available to them internally.

        Lastly, the marketplace has become more global over time, resulting in consulting firms expanding overseas to continue to address the expanding needs of clients and to provide more sophisticated solutions to complex issues that cross global boundaries.

Competitive Strengths

        Since 1965, we have been committed to providing sophisticated consulting services to our clients. We believe that the following factors have been critical to our success.

        Strong Reputation for High-Quality Consulting; High Level of Repeat Business.    For more than 40 years, we have been a leader in providing sophisticated economic analysis and original, authoritative advice to clients involved in complex litigation and regulatory proceedings. As a result, we believe we have established a strong reputation among leading law firms and business clients as a preferred source of expertise in economics, finance, business, and strategy consulting, as evidenced by our high level of repeat business and significant referrals from existing clients. In fiscal 2007, approximately 89% of our revenues resulted from ongoing engagements and new engagements for existing clients. In addition, we believe our significant name recognition, which we developed as a result of our work on many high-profile litigation and regulatory engagements, has enhanced the development of our business consulting practice.

        Highly Educated, Experienced, and Versatile Consulting Staff.    We believe our most important asset is our base of employee consultants, particularly our senior consultants. Of our 771 employee consultants as of November 24, 2007, 540 were either vice presidents, principals, associate principals, senior associates, or consulting associates, the great majority of whom have a doctorate or other advanced degree. Many of these senior employee consultants are nationally or internationally recognized as experts in their respective fields. In addition to their expertise in a particular field, most of our employee consultants are able to apply their skills across numerous practice areas. This flexibility in staffing engagements is critical to our ability to apply our resources as needed to meet the demands

3

of our clients. As a result, we seek to hire consultants who not only have strong analytical skills but who are also creative, intellectually curious, and driven to develop expertise in new practice areas and industries.

        Global Presence.    We deliver our services through a global network of 26 coordinated offices, including 16 domestic and 10 international offices. Our international offices are in Brussels, Manama, Hong Kong, London, Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney, Toronto, Hamburg, and Wellington. Many of our clients are multi-national firms with issues that cross international boundaries, and we believe our global presence provides us with a competitive advantage to address complex issues that span countries and continents. Our global presence also gives us access to many of the leading experts around the world on a variety of issues, allowing us to expand our knowledge base and areas of functional expertise.

        Diversified Business.    Our business is diversified across multiple dimensions, including service offerings, vertical industry coverage, areas of expertise, client base, and geography. Through 26 offices located around the world, we provide multiple services across 25 areas of functional expertise to hundreds of clients across 18 vertical industries. By maintaining expertise in multiple industries, we are able to offer clients creative and pragmatic advice tailored to their specific markets. By offering clients economic, financial, and management consulting services, we are able to satisfy an array of client needs, ranging from expert testimony for complex lawsuits to designing global business strategies. This broad range of expertise enables us to take an interdisciplinary approach to certain engagements, combining economists and experts in one area with specialists in other disciplines. We believe this diversification reduces our dependence on any particular market, industry, or geographic area. Furthermore, our finance and litigation and applied economics businesses are driven primarily by regulatory changes and high-stakes legal proceedings, which typically occur without regard to the business cycle. Our diversity also enhances our expertise and the range of issues that we can address on behalf of our clients.

        Integrated Business.    We manage our business on an integrated basis through our global network of 26 offices and 25 areas of functional expertise. Each of our practice areas operates and is managed across geographic borders and has representative officers and other consultants in several of our offices. We view these cross-border practices as integral to our success and key to our management approach. Our practices cross-staff extensively and share consulting approaches, technical data and analysis, research, and marketing strategies across borders. When we acquire companies, our practice is to rapidly integrate systems, procedures, and people into our business model. In addition to sharing our intellectual property assets globally, we encourage geographic collaboration among our practices by including a consultant's overall contribution to our practices as a factor in determining a consultant's annual bonus.

        Diversified Client Base.    We have completed thousands of engagements for clients in a broad range of industries around the world. In fiscal 2007, our top 10 clients accounted for approximately 19% of our revenues, with no single client accounting for more than 5% of our revenues. Our clients include major firms in: aerospace and defense; banking and capital markets; capital projects; chemicals; energy and utilities; financial services; healthcare; insurance; manufacturing; media; mining, metals, and materials; oil and gas; pharmaceuticals; real estate; retail; sports; telecommunications; and transportation.

        Established Corporate Culture.    Our success has resulted in part from our established corporate culture. We believe we attract consultants because of our more than 40-year history, our strong reputation, the credentials, experience, and reputation of our employee consultants, the opportunity to work on an array of matters with a broad group of renowned non-employee experts, and our collegial atmosphere. We believe our corporate culture also contributes to our ability to successfully integrate our acquisitions.

        Access to Leading Academic and Industry Experts.    To enhance the expertise we provide to our clients, we maintain close working relationships with a select group of non-employee experts.

4

Depending on client needs, we use non-employee experts for their specialized expertise, assistance in conceptual problem-solving, and expert witness testimony. We work regularly with renowned professors at such institutions as Cornell University, Georgetown University, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, Texas A&M University, the University of California at Berkeley, the University of California at Los Angeles, the University of Toronto, the University of Virginia, and other leading universities. These experts also generate business for us and provide us access to other leading academic and industry experts. By establishing affiliations with these prestigious experts, we further enhance our reputation as a leading source of sophisticated economic and financial analysis. We have exclusive relationships with 48 non-employee experts and non-exclusive relationships with numerous additional experts.

        Demonstrated Success with Acquisitions.    Since fiscal 1998, we have made 12 acquisitions. These acquisitions have contributed to our growth in revenues, number of consultants, geographic presence, vertical industry coverage, and areas of functional expertise. In each case, we have been able to integrate these acquisitions into our culture and retain the key consultants, in part because of our systematic approach to the integration of acquired businesses. We devote substantial effort to ensuring that acquired consultants understand our compensation system and have expectations and incentives similar to those of our existing consultants. We make efforts to place acquired consultants appropriately within our management hierarchy, and we regularly appoint acquired consultants to internal committees to provide meaningful participation in the management of our business. We also promote the integrated staffing of new engagements so that existing and acquired consultants begin to work together as a team. We believe our success with acquisitions is a key competitive advantage that will allow us to pursue additional acquisitions to expand the breadth and scope of services we provide.

Services

        During fiscal 2007, we began operating under three platforms: (i) finance, (ii) litigation and applied economics, and (iii) business consulting. Engagements in our three platforms often involve similar areas of expertise and address related issues, and it is common for our consultants to work on engagements within any platform.

Finance

        In our finance platform, we provide consulting services to corporate clients and attorneys in a wide range of litigation and regulatory proceedings. Many of the lawsuits and regulatory proceedings in which we are involved are high-stakes matters, such as analyzing possible damages awards in a securities fraud case. The ability to formulate and communicate effectively powerful economic and financial arguments to courts and regulatory agencies is often critical to a successful outcome in litigation and regulatory proceedings. Through our highly educated and experienced consulting staff, we apply advanced analytic techniques in economics and finance to complex engagements for a diverse group of clients. Our consultants work with law firms to assist in developing the theory of the case, preparing the testimony of expert witnesses, and preparing for the cross- examination of adverse witnesses. We also provide or identify expert witnesses from among our employees and from among our non-employee experts and others in academia. In addition, our consultants provide general litigation support, including reviewing legal briefs and assisting in the appeals process.

5

        The following is a summary of the areas of functional expertise that we offer in financial consulting engagements.

Litigation and Applied Economics

        Our litigation and applied economics platform works closely with law firms on behalf of one or more companies involved in litigation or regulatory proceedings. Many of these lawsuits and regulatory proceedings involve high-stakes matters, such as obtaining regulatory approval of a pending merger or analyzing liability or damages claims in the context of complex litigation. The ability to formulate and effectively communicate powerful economic arguments to courts and regulatory agencies is often critical to a successful outcome in litigation and regulatory proceedings.

        Our highly educated and experienced consulting staff applies advanced methods of economic analysis to complex engagements for a diverse group of clients. In addition to assisting law firms with regulatory proceedings and complex litigation, including providing and supporting expert witnesses who either are employees or academic affiliates, our consultants also provide focused economic expertise in the context of international arbitration and business and strategic planning.

6

        The following is a summary of the areas of functional expertise that we offer in litigation and applied economics engagements.

7

Business Consulting

        Our business consulting platform offers a unique mix of industry and functional expertise to help companies address and solve their most difficult and complex business problems. We advise clients in a broad range of industries on how to succeed in uncertain, rapidly-changing environments by generating growth, creating value, and enhancing shareholder wealth.

        Additionally, we challenge clients to develop fresh approaches by sharing industry insights, focusing on facts, and questioning tradition. We support clients in implementation by setting priorities, focusing resources, and aligning operations; and we get results by helping clients make distinctive, substantial improvements in their organizations' performance.

        The following is a summary of the areas of functional expertise that we offer in business consulting.

8

Industry Expertise

        We believe our ability to combine expertise in advanced economic and financial methods with in-depth knowledge of particular industries is one of our key competitive strengths. By maintaining expertise in certain industries, we provide clients practical advice tailored to their specific markets. This industry expertise, which we developed over decades of providing sophisticated consulting services to a diverse group of clients in many industries, differentiates us from many of our competitors. We believe that we have developed a strong reputation and substantial name recognition within specific industries, which has lead to repeat business and new engagements from clients in those markets. While we provide services to clients in a wide variety of industries, we have particular expertise in the following industries:

•

Aerospace & Defense



•

Banking & Capital Markets



•

Capital Projects



•

Chemicals



•

Energy and Utilities

9

•

Financial Services



•

Healthcare



•

Insurance



•

Manufacturing



•

Media



•

Mining, Metals, and Materials



•

Oil & Gas



•

Pharmaceuticals



•

Real Estate



•

Retail



•

Sports



•

Telecommunications



•

Transportation

Clients

        We have completed thousands of engagements for clients around the world, including domestic and foreign corporations; federal, state, and local domestic government agencies; governments of foreign countries; public and private utilities; and national and international trade associations. Very frequently, we work with major law firms who approach us on behalf of their own clients. While we have particular expertise in a number of industries, we provide services to a diverse group of clients in a broad range of industries. No single client accounted for more than 5% of our revenues in fiscal 2007. Our policy is to keep the identities of our clients confidential unless our work for the client is already publicly disclosed. See Note 13 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of our revenue by geographic region.

Investment in NeuCo

        NeuCo, Inc. ("NeuCo") develops and markets a family of neural network software tools and complementary application consulting services that are currently focused on electric utilities. Although NeuCo had its origins in one of our consulting engagements, it is primarily a software company that operates independently from our consulting business. NeuCo's products and services are designed to help utilities optimize the use of their power plants by improving heat rate, reducing emissions, overcoming operating constraints, and increasing output capability.

        We owned 49.7% of the equity of NeuCo as of November 26, 2005. In May 2006, NeuCo completed the acquisition of Ohio-based Pegasus Technologies, Inc., a majority-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto America Services Company. As a result of the transaction, Pegasus equity holders received an equity interest in NeuCo equal to 26.5% of the outstanding common stock and consequently our interest in NeuCo has been reduced to 36.4%. As such, during the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we began accounting for our remaining investment in NeuCo under the equity method of accounting. Our interest in NeuCo remains at 36.4% as of November 24, 2007 and November 25, 2006, respectively. Prior to NeuCo's acquisition of Pegasus and the resulting reduction of our interest in NeuCo, NeuCo's financial results had been consolidated with ours. Prior to deconsolidation, NeuCo achieved revenues of approximately $3.0 million and a net loss of approximately $280,000 in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005, NeuCo generated $9.0 million in revenues and $114,000 in net income.

10

Human Resources

        On November 24, 2007, we had 1,049 employees, including 771 employee consultants, comprising 176 vice presidents, 364 other senior employee consultants (either principals, associate principals, senior associates, or consulting associates) and 231 junior consultants (either associates, analysts, or staff), as well as 278 administrative staff members. Vice presidents and principals generally work closely with clients, supervise junior consultants, provide expert testimony on occasion, and seek to generate business for CRA. Principals, associate principals, senior associates, and consulting associates typically serve as project managers and handle complex research assignments. Consulting associates, associates, and analysts gather and analyze data sets and complete statistical programming and library research.

        We derive most of our revenues directly from the services provided by our employee consultants. Our employee consultants were responsible for securing engagements that accounted for approximately 86% of our total revenues in fiscal 2007 and 87% of our total revenues in fiscal 2006, excluding reimbursable expenses. Our top five employee consultants generated approximately 11% and 18% of our total revenues in fiscal 2007 and in fiscal 2006, respectively, excluding reimbursable expenses. Our employee consultants have backgrounds in many disciplines, including economics, business, corporate finance, accounting, materials sciences, and engineering. Most of our senior employee consultants, consisting of vice presidents, principals, associate principals, senior associates, and consulting associates, have either a doctorate or another advanced degree in addition to substantial management, technical, or industry expertise. Of our total senior employee consulting staff of 540 as of November 24, 2007, approximately 154 have doctorates, and approximately 259 have other advanced degrees. We believe our financial results and reputation are directly related to the number and quality of our employee consultants.

        We are highly selective in our hiring of consultants, recruiting primarily from leading universities, industry, and government. We believe consultants choose to work for us because of our strong reputation; the credentials, experience, and reputation of our consultants; the opportunity to work on a diverse range of matters and with renowned non-employee experts; and our collegial atmosphere. We use a decentralized, team hiring approach. We have a selective group of leading universities and degree programs from which we recruit candidates.

        Our training and career development program for our employee consultants focuses on three areas: supervision, seminars, and scheduled courses. This program is designed to complement on-the-job experience and an employee's pursuit of his or her own career development. New employee consultants participate in a structured program in which they are partnered with an assigned mentor. Through our ongoing seminar program, outside speakers make presentations and conduct discussions with our employee consultants on various topics. In addition, employee consultants are expected to present papers, discuss significant projects and cases, or outline new analytical techniques or marketing opportunities periodically at in-house seminars. We also provide scheduled courses designed to improve an employee's professional skills, such as presentation and sales and marketing techniques. We also encourage our employee consultants to pursue their academic interests by writing articles for economic and other journals.

        Most of our vice presidents have signed non-solicitation agreements, which generally prohibit the employee from soliciting our clients or soliciting and/or hiring our employees for one year or longer following termination of the person's employment with CRA. In addition, many of the stock options we have issued since 2004 contain a provision that they may only be exercised upon the execution of a non-competition agreement. We seek to align each vice president's interest with our overall interests, and most of our vice presidents have an equity interest in us.

        We maintain a discretionary bonus program through which we grant performance-based bonuses to our officers and other employees. The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, in its discretion, determines the bonuses to be granted to our officers, and our chief executive officer, in his discretion and in consultation with the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, approves the bonuses to be granted to our other employees, based on recommendations of the various

11

committees supervising the employees' work. In fiscal 2007, our shareholders approved a performance-based plan for executive officers that allows us to deduct certain compensation paid to executive officers that would not otherwise be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

        In addition, we work closely with a select group of non-employee experts from leading universities and industry, who supplement the work of our employee consultants and generate business for us. In each of fiscal 2007 and 2006, six of our exclusive non-employee experts were responsible for securing engagements that accounted for approximately 11% and 7% of our revenues in those years, excluding fees charged to the engagement by the non-employee expert and reimbursable expenses. We believe these experts choose to work with us because of the interesting and challenging nature of our work, the opportunity to work with our quality-oriented consultants, and the financially rewarding nature of the work. Forty-eight non-employee experts, generally comprising the more active of those with whom we work, have entered into restrictive covenant contracts, which, in some cases, include non-competition agreements, of varying lengths with us as of November 24, 2007.

Marketing

        We rely to a significant extent on the efforts of our employee consultants, particularly our vice presidents and principals, to market our services. We encourage our employee consultants to generate new business from both existing and new clients, and we reward our employee consultants with increased compensation and promotions for obtaining new business. In pursuing new business, our consultants emphasize our institutional reputation and experience, while also promoting the expertise of the particular employees who will work on the matter. Many of our consultants have published articles in industry, business, economic, legal, and scientific journals, and have made speeches and presentations at industry conferences and seminars, which serve as a means of attracting new business and enhancing their reputations. On occasion, employee consultants work with one or more non-employee experts to market our services.

        We supplement the personal marketing efforts of our employee consultants with firm-wide initiatives. We rely primarily on our reputation and client referrals for new business and undertake traditional marketing activities. We regularly organize seminars for existing and potential clients featuring panel members that include our consultants, non-employee experts, and leading government officials. We have an extensive set of brochures organized around our service areas, which describe our experience and capabilities. We also provide information about CRA on our corporate website. We distribute publications to existing and potential clients highlighting emerging trends and noteworthy engagements. Because existing clients are an important source of repeat business and referrals, we communicate regularly with our existing clients to keep them informed of developments that affect their markets and industries.

        All three of our operating platforms (finance; litigation and applied economics; and business consulting) derive the majority of new business from referrals by existing clients. We have worked with leading law firms across the country and believe we have developed a reputation among law firms as a preferred source of sophisticated economic advice for litigation and regulatory work. For our business consulting platform, we also rely on referrals from existing clients, but supplement referrals with a significant amount of direct marketing to new clients through conferences, seminars, publications, presentations, and direct solicitations.

        It is important to us that we conduct business ethically and in accordance with industry standards and our own rigorous professional standards. We carefully consider the pursuit of each specific market, client, and engagement. Before we accept a new client or engagement, we determine whether a conflict of interest exists by circulating a client development report among our senior staff and by checking our internal client database. If we accept an engagement where a potential conflict could arise, we take steps to separate the employee consultants working on other matters that could conflict with the new engagement in an effort to prevent the exchange of confidential information.

12

Competition

        The market for economic and business consulting services is intensely competitive, highly fragmented, and subject to rapid change. In general, there are few barriers to entry into our markets, and we expect to face additional competition from new entrants into the economic and business consulting industries. In the litigation and applied economics and financial consulting markets, we compete primarily with other economic consulting firms and individual academics. We believe the principal competitive factors in this market are reputation, analytical ability, industry expertise, size, and service. In the business consulting market, we compete primarily with other business and management consulting firms, specialized or industry-specific consulting firms, the consulting practices of large accounting firms, and the internal professional resources of existing and potential clients. We believe the principal competitive factors in this market are reputation, industry expertise, analytical ability, service, and price.

Item 1A—Risk Factors

        Our operations are subject to a number of risks. You should carefully read and consider the following risk factors, together with all other information in this report, in evaluating our business. If any of these risks, or any risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not significant, develops into an actual event, then our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. If that happens, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We depend upon key employees to generate revenue

        Our business consists primarily of the delivery of professional services, and accordingly, our success depends heavily on the efforts, abilities, business generation capabilities, and project execution capabilities of our employee consultants. In particular, our employee consultants' personal relationships with our clients are a critical element in obtaining and maintaining client engagements. If we lose the services of any employee consultant or if our employee consultants fail to generate business or otherwise fail to perform effectively, that loss or failure could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. Our employee consultants generated engagements that accounted for approximately 86% of our revenues in fiscal 2007 and approximately 87% in fiscal 2006, excluding reimbursable expenses. Our top five employee consultants generated approximately 11% and 18% of our revenues in fiscal 2007 and in fiscal 2006, respectively, excluding reimbursable expenses. We do not have non-compete agreements with the majority of our employee consultants, and they can terminate their relationships with us at will and without notice. The non-competition and non-solicitation agreements that we have with some of our employee consultants offer us only limited protection and may not be enforceable in every jurisdiction.

Our failure to manage growth successfully could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations

        Any failure on our part to manage growth successfully could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. Over the last several years, we have continued to open offices in new geographic areas, including foreign locations, and to expand our employee base as a result of internal growth and acquisitions, including our recent acquisitions of The Ballentine Barbera Group, LLC, Economics of Competition and Litigation Limited, and Lee & Allen Consulting Limited. We expect that this trend will continue over the long term. Opening and managing new offices often requires extensive management supervision and increases our overall selling, general, and administrative expenses. Expansion creates new and increased management, consulting, and training responsibilities for our employee consultants. Expansion also increases the demands on our internal systems, procedures, and controls, and on our managerial, administrative, financial, marketing, and other resources. We depend heavily upon the managerial, operational, and administrative skills of our officers, particularly James C.

13

Burrows, our President and Chief Executive Officer, to manage our expansion. New responsibilities and demands may adversely affect the overall quality of our work.

Acquisitions may disrupt our operations or adversely affect our results

        We regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire other businesses. The expenses we incur evaluating and pursuing acquisitions could adversely affect our results of operations. If we acquire a business, such as our recent acquisitions of The Ballentine Barbera Group, LLC, Economics of Competition and Litigation Limited, and Lee & Allen Consulting Limited, we may be unable to manage it profitably or successfully integrate its operations with our own. Moreover, we may be unable to realize the financial, operational, and other benefits we anticipate from these acquisitions or any other acquisition. Many potential acquisition targets do not meet our criteria, and for those that do, we face significant competition for these acquisitions from our direct competitors, private equity funds, and other enterprises. Competition for future acquisition opportunities in our markets could increase the price we pay for businesses we acquire and could reduce the number of potential acquisition targets. Further, acquisitions may involve a number of special financial and business risks, such as:

•

charges related to any potential acquisition from which we may withdraw;



•

diversion of our management's time, attention, and resources;



•

decreased utilization during the integration process;



•

loss of key acquired personnel;



•

increased costs to improve or coordinate managerial, operational, financial, and administrative systems including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;



•

dilutive issuances of equity securities, including convertible debt securities;



•

the assumption of legal liabilities;



•

amortization of acquired intangible assets;



•

potential write-offs related to the impairment of goodwill;



•

difficulties in integrating diverse corporate cultures; and



•

additional conflicts of interests.

Our international operations create special risks

        We may continue our international expansion, and our international revenues may account for an increasing portion of our revenues in the future. Our international operations carry special financial and business risks, including:

•

greater difficulties in managing and staffing foreign operations;



•

cultural differences that result in lower utilization;



•

currency fluctuations that adversely affect our financial position and operating results;



•

unexpected changes in trading policies, regulatory requirements, tariffs, and other barriers;



•

greater difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;



•

increased selling, general, and administrative expenses associated with managing a larger and more global organization;



•

longer sales cycles;



•

restrictions on the repatriation of earnings;



•

potentially adverse tax consequences, such as trapped foreign losses;

14

•

differences in the legal and regulatory environment in foreign jurisdictions, as well as U.S. laws and regulations related to our foreign operations;



•

less stable political and economic environments; and



•

civil disturbances or other catastrophic events that reduce business activity.

        We conduct a growing portion of our business in the Middle East. At times, the ongoing terrorist activity and military and other conflicts in the region have significantly interrupted our business operations in that region and have slowed the flow of new opportunities and proposals, which ultimately have adversely affected our revenues and results of operations.

        If our international revenues continue to increase relative to our total revenues, these factors could have a more pronounced effect on our operating results.

Our entry into new lines of business could adversely affect our results of operations

        If we attempt to develop new practice areas or lines of business outside our core economic and business consulting services, those efforts could harm our results of operations. Our efforts in new practice areas or new lines of business involve inherent risks, including risks associated with inexperience and competition from mature participants in the markets we enter. Our inexperience in these new practice areas or lines of business may result in costly decisions that could harm our business.

Maintaining our professional reputation is crucial to our future success

        Our ability to secure new engagements and hire qualified consultants as employees depends heavily on our overall reputation as well as the individual reputations of our employee consultants and principal non-employee experts. Because we obtain a majority of our new engagements from existing clients or from referrals by those clients, any client that is dissatisfied with our performance on a single matter could seriously impair our ability to secure new engagements. Given the frequently high-profile nature of the matters on which we work, including work before and on behalf of government agencies, any factor that diminishes our reputation or the reputations of any of our employee consultants or non-employee experts could make it substantially more difficult for us to compete successfully for both new engagements and qualified consultants.

Competition from other economic, litigation support, and business consulting firms could hurt our business

        The market for economic, litigation support, and business consulting services is intensely competitive, highly fragmented, and subject to rapid change. We may be unable to compete successfully with our existing competitors or with any new competitors. In general, there are few barriers to entry into our markets, and we expect to face additional competition from new entrants into the economic and business consulting industries. In the litigation and applied economics and financial consulting markets, we compete primarily with other economic and financial consulting firms and individual academics. In the business consulting market, we compete primarily with other business and management consulting firms, specialized or industry-specific consulting firms, the consulting practices of large accounting firms, and the internal professional resources of existing and potential clients. Many of our competitors have national or international reputations as well as significantly greater personnel, financial, managerial, technical, and marketing resources than we do, which could enhance their ability to respond more quickly to technological changes, finance acquisitions, and fund internal growth. Some of our competitors also have a significantly broader geographic presence than we do.

Our business could suffer if we are unable to hire additional qualified consultants as employees

        Our business continually requires us to hire highly qualified, highly educated consultants as employees. Our failure to recruit and retain a significant number of qualified employee consultants

15

could limit our ability to accept or complete engagements and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. Relatively few potential employees meet our hiring criteria, and we face significant competition for these employees from our direct competitors, academic institutions, government agencies, research firms, investment banking firms, and other enterprises. Many of these competing employers are able to offer potential employees significantly greater compensation and benefits or more attractive lifestyle choices, career paths, or geographic locations than we can. Competition for these employee consultants has increased our labor costs, and a continuation of this trend could adversely affect our margins and results of operations.

We depend on our antitrust and mergers and acquisitions consulting business

        We derived approximately 26% of our revenues in fiscal 2007, 27% of our revenues in fiscal 2006, and 28% of our revenues in fiscal 2005 from engagements in our antitrust and mergers and acquisitions practice areas. Any substantial reduction in the number or size of our engagements in these practice areas could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. We derived significant revenues from engagements relating to enforcement of U.S. antitrust laws. Changes in federal antitrust laws, changes in judicial interpretations of these laws, or less vigorous enforcement of these laws as a result of changes in political appointments or priorities or for other reasons could substantially reduce our revenues from engagements in this area. In addition, adverse changes in general economic conditions, particularly conditions influencing the merger and acquisition activity of larger companies, could adversely affect engagements in which we assist clients in proceedings before the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. An economic slowdown may have an adverse effect on mergers and acquisitions activity, which would reduce the number and scope of our engagements in this practice area. Any such downturn would adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

We depend on our non-employee experts

        We depend on our relationships with our exclusive non-employee experts. In fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, six of our exclusive non-employee experts generated engagements that accounted for approximately 11% and 7% of our revenues in those years, respectively, excluding fees charged to the engagement by the non-employee expert and reimbursable expenses. We believe that these experts are highly regarded in their fields and that each offers a combination of knowledge, experience, and expertise that would be very difficult to replace. We also believe that we have been able to secure some engagements and attract consultants in part because we could offer the services of these experts. Most of these experts can limit their relationships with us at any time for any reason. These reasons could include affiliations with universities with policies that prohibit accepting specified engagements, the pursuit of other interests, and retirement.

        As of November 24, 2007, we had restrictive covenant contracts, which in some cases include non-competition agreements, with 48 of our non-employee experts. The limitation or termination of any of their relationships with us, or competition from any of them after these agreements expire, could harm our reputation, reduce our business opportunities and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

        To meet our long-term growth targets, we need to establish ongoing relationships with additional non-employee experts who have reputations as leading experts in their fields. We may be unable to establish relationships with any additional non-employee experts. In addition, any relationship that we do establish may not help us meet our objectives or generate the revenues or earnings that we anticipate.

Clients can terminate engagements with us at any time

        Many of our engagements depend upon disputes, proceedings, or transactions that involve our clients. Our clients may decide at any time to seek to resolve the dispute or proceeding, abandon the transaction, or file for bankruptcy. Our engagements can therefore terminate suddenly and without

16

advance notice to us. If an engagement is terminated unexpectedly, our employee consultants working on the engagement could be underutilized until we assign them to other projects. In addition, because much of our work is project-based rather than recurring in nature, our consultants' utilization depends on our ability to secure additional engagements on a continual basis. Accordingly, the termination or significant reduction in the scope of a single large engagement could reduce our utilization and have an immediate adverse impact on our revenues and results of operations.

Fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and results of operations could depress the market price of our common stock

        We may experience significant fluctuations in our revenues and results of operations from one quarter to the next. If our revenues or net income in a quarter or our guidance for future periods fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock could fall significantly. Our results of operations in any quarter can fluctuate for many reasons, including:

•

the number of weeks in our fiscal quarter;



•

the number, scope, and timing of ongoing client engagements;



•

the extent to which we can reassign our employee consultants efficiently from one engagement to the next;



•

the extent to which our employee consultants take holiday, vacation, and sick time, including traditional seasonality related to summer vacation and winter holiday schedules;



•

employee hiring;



•

the extent of fees discounting or cost overruns;



•

fluctuations related to our investment in NeuCo, Inc., including charges for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of our investment in NeuCo;



•

fluctuations in our provision for income taxes due to changes in income arising in various tax jurisdictions, valuation allowances, non-deductible expenses, and changes in estimates for tax contingencies;



•

severe weather conditions and other factors affecting employee productivity; and



•

collectibility of receivables and unbilled work in process.

        Because we generate the majority of our revenues from consulting services that we provide on an hourly fee basis, our revenues in any period are directly related to the number of our employee consultants, their billing rates, and the number of billable hours they work in that period. We have a limited ability to increase any of these factors in the short term. Accordingly, if we underutilize our consultants during one part of a fiscal period, we may be unable to compensate by augmenting revenues during another part of that period. In addition, we are occasionally unable to utilize fully any additional consultants that we hire, particularly in the quarter in which we hire them. Moreover, a significant majority of our operating expenses, primarily office rent and salaries, are fixed in the short term. As a result, if our revenues fail to meet our projections in any quarter, that could have a disproportionate adverse effect on our net income. For these reasons, we believe our historical results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.

Regulatory and legislative changes, and market conditions affecting our clients, practice areas, competitors, or staff could have an impact on our business

        Many of our clients are in highly regulated industries. Regulatory and legislative changes in these industries could impact the market for our service offerings and could render our current service offerings obsolete, reduce the demand for our services, or impact the competition for consulting and expert services. For example, potential changes in the patent laws could have a significant impact on

17

our intellectual property practice. Similarly, overall market conditions in the industries we service could also impact the market for our services. For example, a significant decrease in the price of oil could reduce the number and scope of our engagements in various practice areas.

Our engagements may result in professional liability

        Our services typically involve difficult analytical assignments and carry risks of professional and other liability. Many of our engagements involve matters that could have a severe impact on the client's business, cause the client to lose significant amounts of money, or prevent the client from pursuing desirable business opportunities. Accordingly, if a client is dissatisfied with our performance, the client could threaten or bring litigation in order to recover damages or to contest its obligation to pay our fees. Litigation alleging that we performed negligently or otherwise breached our obligations to the client could expose us to significant liabilities and tarnish our reputation.

We derive our revenues from a limited number of large engagements

        We derive a portion of our revenues from a limited number of large engagements. If we do not obtain a significant number of new large engagements each year, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could suffer. Our ten largest engagements accounted for approximately 11% of our revenues in fiscal 2007, 14% in fiscal 2006, and 12% in fiscal 2005. Our ten largest clients accounted for approximately 19% of our revenues in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, and 20% in fiscal 2005. In general, the volume of work we perform for any particular client varies from year to year, and due to the specific engagement nature of our practice, a major client in one year may not hire us in the following year.

Potential conflicts of interests may preclude us from accepting some engagements

        We provide our services primarily in connection with significant or complex transactions, disputes, or other matters that are usually adversarial or that involve sensitive client information. Our engagement by a client may preclude us from accepting engagements with the client's competitors or adversaries because of conflicts between their business interests or positions on disputed issues or other reasons. Accordingly, the nature of our business limits the number of both potential clients and potential engagements. Our recent acquisitions of The Ballentine Barbera Group, LLC, Economics of Competition and Litigation Limited, and Lee & Allen Consulting Limited have significantly expanded our client base, which may increase the frequency with which we encounter conflicts of interest. Moreover, in many industries in which we provide consulting services, such as in the telecommunications industry, there has been a continuing trend toward business consolidations and strategic alliances. These consolidations and alliances reduce the number of potential clients for our services and increase the chances that we will be unable to continue some of our ongoing engagements or accept new engagements as a result of conflicts of interests.

We enter into fixed-price engagements

        We derive a portion of our revenues from fixed-price contracts. In fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, we derived 6.6% and 5.3% of our revenues from fixed-price engagements, respectively. These contracts are more common in our business consulting practice, and would likely grow in number with any expansion of that practice. If we fail to estimate accurately the resources required for a fixed-price project or fail to satisfy our contractual obligations in a manner consistent with the project budget, we might generate a smaller profit or incur a loss on the project. On occasion, we have had to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete projects, and we may have to take similar action in the future, which could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

18

Our reported earnings per share may be more volatile because of the accounting standards, rules, and regulations as they relate to our convertible senior subordinated debentures

        Holders of our 2.875% convertible senior subordinated debentures due 2034 may convert the debentures only under certain circumstances, including certain stock price-related conversion contingencies. As further described in Note 10 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we determine the effect of the debentures on earnings per share under the treasury stock method of accounting. The treasury stock method of accounting allows us to report dilution only when our average stock price per share for the reporting period exceeds the $40 conversion price and only to the extent of the additional shares we may be required to issue in the event our conversion obligation exceeds the principal amount of the debentures converted. Accordingly, volatility in our stock price could cause volatility in our reported diluted earnings per share.

        The FASB has issued a proposed Staff Position that, if adopted, would apply to any convertible debt instrument that may be settled in whole or in part with cash upon conversion, which would include our 2.875% debentures. We would be required to adopt the proposal as of the beginning of our fiscal 2009, with retrospective application to financial statements for periods prior to the date of adoption. The FASB proposal would require us to allocate a portion of the proceeds on the debt to the embedded conversion feature, thereby creating a discount on the value stated of the debt. This discount would subsequently be amortized as interest expense over the term of the instrument resulting in an increase to our reported interest expense. This could materially impact our results of operations and earnings per share. We do not anticipate that the potential adoption of the proposal would affect our cash flows.

Our clients may be unable to pay us for our services

        Our clients include some companies that may from time to time encounter financial difficulties. If a client's financial difficulties become severe, the client may be unwilling or unable to pay our invoices in the ordinary course of business, which could adversely affect collections of both our accounts receivable and unbilled services. On occasion, some of our clients have entered bankruptcy, which has prevented us from collecting amounts owed to us. The bankruptcy of a client with a substantial account receivable could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. A small number of clients who have paid sizable invoices later declared bankruptcy, and a court determination that we were not properly entitled to that payment may require repayment of some or all of the amount we received, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We could incur substantial costs protecting our proprietary rights from infringement or defending against a claim of infringement

        As a professional services organization, we rely on non-competition and non-solicitation agreements with many of our employees and non-employee experts to protect our proprietary business interests. These agreements, however, may offer us only limited protection and may not be enforceable in every jurisdiction. In addition, we may incur substantial costs trying to enforce these agreements.

        Our services may involve the development of custom business processes or solutions for specific clients. In some cases, the clients retain ownership or impose restrictions on our ability to use the business processes or solutions developed from these projects. Issues relating to the ownership of business processes or solutions can be complicated, and disputes could arise that affect our ability to resell or reuse business processes or solutions we develop for clients.

        In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the U.S. involving patents and other intellectual property rights. We could incur substantial costs in prosecuting or defending any intellectual property litigation, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

19

        Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our proprietary rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Any such resulting litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Any failure by us to protect our proprietary rights could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile

        The market price of our common stock has fluctuated widely and may continue to do so. For example, from November 26, 2006, to November 24, 2007, the trading price of our common stock ranged from a high of $55.00 per share to a low of $43.74 per share. Many factors could cause the market price of our common stock to rise and fall. Some of these factors are:

•

variations in our quarterly results of operations;



•

the hiring or departure of key personnel or non-employee experts;



•

changes in our professional reputation;



•

the introduction of new services by us or our competitors;



•

acquisitions or strategic alliances involving us or our competitors;



•

changes in accounting principles or methods, such as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47, and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48;



•

changes in estimates of our performance or recommendations by securities analysts;



•

future sales of shares of common stock in the public market; and



•

market conditions in the industry and the economy as a whole.

        In addition, the stock market often experiences significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations are often unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. When the market price of a company's stock drops significantly, shareholders often institute securities class action litigation against that company. Any litigation against us could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert the time and attention of our management and other resources, or otherwise harm our business.

Our debt obligations may adversely impact our financial performance

        In June and July of 2004, we issued a total of $90.0 million of 2.875% convertible senior subordinated debentures due 2034. We had previously operated with little or no debt, and our previous payments of interest had not been material. The interest we are required to pay on these debentures reduces our net income each year and will continue to do so until the debentures are no longer outstanding. The terms of the debentures also include provisions that could accelerate our obligation to repay all amounts outstanding under the debentures if certain events happen, such as our failure to pay interest in a timely manner, failure to pay principal upon redemption or repurchase, failure to deliver cash, shares of common stock, or other property upon conversion and other specified events of default. In addition, on June 15, 2011, June 15, 2014, June 15, 2019, June 15, 2024 and June 15, 2029, or following specified fundamental changes, holders of the debentures may require us to repurchase their debentures for cash. On December 14, 2004, we irrevocably elected to settle with cash 100% of the principal amount of the debentures upon conversion thereof, and holders of the debentures may convert them if our stock price exceeds $50 per share for at least 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter. Because the closing price of our common stock did not equal or exceed the $50 per share contingent conversion trigger price for 20 out of the 30

20

consecutive trading days ended on November 24, 2007, holders of the debentures are not able to exercise their right to convert the bonds during our first fiscal quarter ending on February 15, 2008. The last reported sales price of our common stock was less than $50 per share for more than ten days in the thirty consecutive trading day period ending on the last day of our first quarter of fiscal 2008. Because of this occurrence, holders of the debentures may not convert them during our second fiscal quarter ending on May 9, 2008. This test is repeated each fiscal quarter. To date, no conversions have occurred. On June 20, 2005, we amended our loan agreement with our bank to increase the existing line of credit from $40.0 million to $90.0 million to mitigate the potential liquidity risk, and to provide funding if required, in the event of conversion by the debenture holders. We intend to use the amounts available under our bank line of credit, in the event debenture holders exercise their rights to convert. The degree to which we are leveraged could adversely affect our ability to obtain further financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures.

Our charter and by-laws, Massachusetts law and the terms of our convertible debentures may deter takeovers

        Our amended and restated articles of organization and amended and restated by-laws and Massachusetts law contain provisions that could have anti-takeover effects and that could discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control or an acquisition that our shareholders and debenture holders may find attractive. These provisions may also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for our shareholders to take some corporate actions, including the election of directors. In addition, the terms of our convertible debentures provide that we may be required to pay a make-whole premium to the holders of our convertible debentures upon a change of control. These provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock.

Item 1B—Unresolved Staff Comments

        Not applicable.

Item 2—Properties

        In the aggregate, as of November 24, 2007, we lease approximately 411,000 square feet of office space in locations around the world. Of this total, we have subleased to other companies approximately 18,000 square feet of our office space.

        All of our offices are electronically linked and have access to our core consulting tools. We believe our existing facilities are adequate to meet our current requirements and that suitable space will be available as needed.

Item 3—Legal Proceedings

        None.

Item 4—Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.

21

PART II

Item 5—Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        Market Information.    We first offered our common stock to the public on April 23, 1998. Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CRAI. The following table provides the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market or NASDAQ Global Select Market, as applicable, for the periods indicated.

        Shareholders.    We had approximately 94 holders of record of our common stock as of January 30, 2008. This number does not include shareholders for whom shares were held in a "nominee" or "street" name.

        Dividends.    We have not paid any cash dividends in the past and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our bank line of credit place restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.

        Repurchases of Equity Securities.    The following table provides information about our repurchases of shares of our common stock during the twelve weeks ended November 24, 2007. During that period, we did not act in concert with any affiliate or any other person to acquire any of our common stock and, accordingly, we do not have any purchases by any affiliate or other person (if any) that are reportable in the following table. For purposes of this table, we have divided the quarter into three equal periods of four weeks.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(1)

On October 17, 2007, we repurchased 14,899 shares of our common stock from one of our employees, based on the contractual right of first purchase contained in the employee's stock purchase agreement with us.

22

(2)

We are a party to a stock restriction agreement with certain shareholders under which we have specified rights to repurchase shares of common stock held by them, as described in more detail in our proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting of shareholders under the heading "Transactions with Related Parties—Stock restriction agreement."

(3)

On June 14, 2007, we issued a press release announcing that our board of directors has approved the repurchase from time to time of up to 1,500,000 shares of our common stock, of which 915,235 shares of common stock were purchased in prior quarters and 584,765 shares of our common stock remain available for purchase. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we did not purchase any shares authorized under this plan.

        Shareholder Return Performance Graph.    The graph below compares our cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index, and a customized peer group of four companies that includes: LECG Corp., Navigant Consulting Inc., FTI Consulting Inc., and Huron Consulting Group Inc. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock, in the peer group, and the index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from November 30, 2002 to November 24, 2007. We paid no cash dividends during the period shown. The inclusion of LECG Corporation in the peer group begins with the date of its initial public offering on November 14, 2003. The inclusion of Huron Consulting Group, Inc. in the peer group begins with the date of its initial public offering on October 18, 2004.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among CRA International, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index
And A Peer Group

        The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

23

Item 6—Selected Financial Data

        The following selected consolidated financial data as of and for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended November 24, 2007, has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.

24

(1)

During the past five fiscal years, we made the following acquisitions:

•

May 23, 2006, certain assets of The Ballentine Barbera Group.

•

June 16, 2005, the equity of Economics of Competition and Litigation Limited, formerly known as Lexecon Ltd.

•

April 27, 2005, the equity of Lee & Allen Consulting Limited.

•

November 18, 2004, the equity of Network Economics Consulting Group Pty Ltd.

•

November 12, 2004, certain assets and liabilities of Tabors Caramanis & Associates.

•

April 30, 2004, the equity of InteCap, Inc.

Each of these acquisitions was accounted for under the purchase accounting method, and the results of operations for each of these acquisitions have been included in the accompanying statements of income from the respective dates of acquisition.

(2)

Prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we classified our internal information technology group's labor costs as an element of "cost of services". In recent years, the information technology group gradually became less involved in client projects and more focused on internal systems. Accordingly, we recorded these costs that are not billable to clients to "selling, general and administrative expenses" in all periods presented. This classification has no effect on income from operations or net income.

(3)

Basic net income per share represents net income divided by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share represents net income divided by the weighted average shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Weighted average shares used in diluted net income per share include common stock equivalents arising from stock options, unvested restricted stock, and shares underlying our debentures using the treasury stock method.

25

Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

        We are a worldwide leading economic, financial, and management consulting firm that applies advanced analytic techniques and in-depth industry knowledge to complex engagements for a broad range of clients.

        We derive revenues principally from professional services rendered by our employee consultants. In most instances, we charge clients on a time-and-materials basis and recognize revenues in the period when we provide our services. We charge consultants' time at hourly rates, which vary from consultant to consultant depending on a consultant's position, experience, and expertise, and other factors. We derive a portion of our revenues from fixed-price contracts. Revenues from fixed-price engagements are recognized using a proportional performance method based on the ratio of costs incurred, substantially all of which are labor-related, to the total estimated project costs. We derived 6.6% and 5.3% of our revenues from fixed-price engagements in fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. We generate substantially all of our professional services fees from the work of our own employee consultants and a portion from the work of our non-employee experts. Factors that affect our professional services revenues include the number and scope of client engagements, the number of consultants we employ, the consultants' billing rates, and the number of hours our consultants work. Revenues also include reimbursements, or expenses billed to clients, which include travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, outside consultants, and other reimbursable expenses.

        Our costs of services include the salaries, bonuses, share-based compensation expense (in fiscal 2007 and 2006 only), and benefits of our employee consultants. Our bonus program awards discretionary bonuses based on our revenues and profitability and individual performance. Costs of services also include out-of-pocket and other expenses that are billed to clients, and the salaries, bonuses, and benefits of support staff whose time is billed directly to clients, such as librarians, editors, and programmers. Selling, general, and administrative expenses include salaries, bonuses, share-based compensation expense, and benefits of our administrative and support staff, fees to non-employee experts for generating new business, office rent, marketing, and other costs.

Utilization & Seasonality

        Because we derive the majority of our revenues from hourly billings by our employee consultants, our utilization of those employee consultants is one key indicator that we use to measure our operating performance. We calculate utilization by dividing the total hours worked by our employee consultants on engagements during the measurement period by the total number of hours that our employee consultants were available to work during that period. Utilization was 75% for fiscal 2007 and 78% for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. We experience higher utilization in our finance and litigation and applied economics platforms than in our business consulting platform because our business consulting practice devotes a greater portion of its time to sales and marketing efforts.

        We experience certain seasonal effects that impact our revenue. Because our revenues depend on the number of hours worked by our employee consultants, concurrent vacations or holidays taken by a large number of consultants can adversely impact our revenue. Historically, we experience lower utilization in the first quarter, which includes the holiday season, and in the third quarter, which is a 16-week period, and includes the summer vacation season for most of our offices.

Fiscal Periods

        Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in November, and accordingly, our fiscal year will periodically contain 53 weeks rather than 52 weeks. Historically, we have managed our business based on 13 four-week billing cycles to clients and, consequently, have established quarters that are divisible by four-week periods. As a result, the first, second, and fourth quarters of each fiscal year are 12-week periods, and the third quarter of each fiscal year is a 16-week period. In those years when our fiscal year contains 53 weeks, our fourth quarter is a 13-week period. Accordingly, period-to-period

26

comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful if the periods being compared have different lengths.

        The terms "fiscal 2007," "fiscal 2006," and "fiscal 2005" refer to the 52-week periods ended November 24, 2007, November 25, 2006, and November 26, 2005, respectively.

Acquisitions and International Expansion

        On May 23, 2006, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of The Ballentine Barbera Group, LLC ("BBG"), an independent consulting firm focusing on transfer pricing services headquartered in Washington, D.C. We purchased BBG for approximately $27.9 million (after adding acquisition costs, additional contingent purchase payments, and transaction fees paid or accrued). The purchase price consisted of $22.9 million in cash and $5.0 million in CRA restricted stock. The BBG acquisition added approximately 35 employee consultants.

        On June 16, 2005, we completed the acquisition of all of the equity of Economics of Competition and Litigation Limited ("ECL"), a London-based provider of competition economics in Europe, formerly known as Lexecon Ltd. We purchased ECL for approximately $18.2 million valued using foreign exchange rates as of the date of acquisition (after deducting cash acquired, and adding acquisition costs, additional contingent purchase payments, and transaction fees paid or accrued). The purchase price consisted of $13.7 million in cash and $4.5 million in loan notes that were exchanged for 86,306 shares of our common stock, which carry restrictions with respect to when they can be sold. The ECL acquisition added approximately 25 employee consultants.

        On April 27, 2005, we completed the acquisition of all of the equity of Lee & Allen Consulting Limited ("Lee & Allen"), a London-based consulting firm offering financial dispute resolution and forensic accounting services to the corporate, legal, and regulatory markets. We purchased Lee & Allen for approximately $18.0 million valued using foreign exchange rates as of the date of the acquisition (after deducting cash acquired, and adding acquisition costs, additional contingent purchase payments, and transaction fees paid or accrued). The purchase price consisted of $14.0 million in cash and $4.0 million in loan notes that were exchanged for 81,990 shares of our common stock, which carry restrictions with respect to when they can be sold. The Lee & Allen acquisition added approximately 40 employee consultants.

        The BBG, ECL, and Lee & Allen acquisitions have been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and the results of operations have been included in the accompanying statements of income from the date of acquisition. The purchase agreements for these acquisitions provide for additional purchase consideration for up to five years following the transactions, if specific performance targets are met. These earnouts are payable in cash and/or our common stock. Any additional payments related to these contingencies will be accounted for as additional goodwill. During fiscal 2005, CRA recorded an additional $1.1 million of purchase price related to acquisitions, which was paid in cash and common stock during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2006, CRA recorded $1.5 million in additional purchase price related to these acquisitions, which included promissory notes and common stock. The promissory notes were paid during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2007, CRA recorded an additional $7.6 million of purchase price related to these acquisitions, which included cash, promissory notes, and common stock. These payments, and any additional payments related to these contingencies, have been and will be accounted for as additional goodwill.

        Revenues from our international operations accounted for 26.7%, 23.6%, and 19.1% of our total revenues in fiscal 2007, fiscal 2006, and fiscal 2005, respectively, as more fully described in Note 13 to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our international revenues for fiscal 2006 reflect a full year of operations for the Lee & Allen and ECL acquisitions, which occurred during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2005, respectively. In addition, our international revenues for fiscal 2005 include partial year operations for the United Kingdom-based ECL and Lee & Allen acquisitions. These acquisitions have significantly increased the diversification of our European business, including forensic accounting and computing practices, and expanded service offerings in competition economics,

27

commercial litigation, and energy industries. We have also developed a significant presence in the European litigation and regulatory markets; in addition, as a result of these acquisitions, we expanded our service offerings to clients in South Africa, Hong Kong, and other parts of Asia. We continue to actively evaluate opportunities to strengthen our presence overseas.

Investment in NeuCo

        We owned 49.7% of the equity of NeuCo, Inc. as of November 26, 2005. In May 2006, NeuCo completed the acquisition of Ohio-based Pegasus Technologies, Inc., a majority-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto America Services Company. As a result of the transaction, Pegasus equity holders received an equity interest in NeuCo equal to 26.5% of the outstanding common stock and consequently our interest in NeuCo was reduced to 36.4%. As such, during the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we began accounting for our remaining investment in NeuCo under the equity method of accounting. Our interest in NeuCo remains at 36.4% as of November 24, 2007 and November 25, 2006, respectively. Prior to NeuCo's acquisition of Pegasus and the resulting reduction of our interest in NeuCo, NeuCo's financial results had been consolidated with ours. Prior to deconsolidation, NeuCo achieved revenues of approximately $3.0 million and a net loss of approximately $280,000 in the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005, NeuCo generated $9.0 million in revenues and $114,000 in net income.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates in these consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, accounts receivable allowances, revenue recognition on fixed price contracts, depreciation of property and equipment, share-based compensation, valuation of acquired intangible assets, impairment of long lived assets, including goodwill, accrued and deferred income taxes, valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, and accrued bonuses and other accrued expenses. These items are monitored and analyzed by management for changes in facts and circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from our estimates if our assumptions based on past experience or our other assumptions do not turn out to be substantially accurate.

        A summary of the accounting policies that we believe are most critical to understanding and evaluating our financial results is set forth below. This summary should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

        Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable Allowances.    We derive substantially all of our revenues from the performance of professional services. The contracts that we enter into and operate under specify whether the engagement will be billed on a time-and-materials or fixed-price basis. These engagements generally last three to six months, although some of our engagements can be much longer in duration. Each contract must be approved by one of our vice presidents.

        We recognize substantially all of our revenues under written service contracts with our clients where the fee is fixed or determinable, as the services are provided, and only in those situations where collection from the client is reasonably assured. In certain limited cases we provide services to our clients without sufficient contractual documentation to allow us to recognize revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In these cases, where we invoice clients, these amounts are fully reserved until all criteria for recognizing revenue are met. The majority of our revenue is derived from time-and-materials service contracts. Revenues from time-and-materials service contracts are recognized as the services are provided based upon hours worked and contractually agreed-upon hourly rates, as

28

well as a computer services fee based upon hours worked. Revenues from fixed-price engagements are recognized on a proportional performance method based on the ratio of costs incurred, substantially all of which are labor-related, to the total estimated project costs. Project costs are based on the direct salary of the consultants on the engagement plus all direct expenses incurred to complete the engagement that are not reimbursed by the client. The proportional performance method is used since reasonably dependable estimates of the revenues and costs applicable to various stages of a contract can be made, based on historical experience and terms set forth in the contract, and are indicative of the level of benefit provided to our clients. Our fixed-price contracts generally include a termination provision that converts the agreement to a time-and-materials contract in the event of termination of the contract. There are no costs that are deferred and amortized over the contract term. Our management maintains contact with project managers to discuss the status of the projects and, for fixed-price engagements, management is updated on the budgeted costs and resources required to complete the project. These budgets are then used to calculate revenue recognition and to estimate the anticipated income or loss on the project. In the past, we have occasionally been required to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete projects, which have resulted in lower than anticipated income or losses on those contracts. We may experience similar situations in the future. Provisions for estimated losses on contracts are made during the period in which such losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. To date, such losses have not been significant.

        Revenues also include reimbursements, or expenses billed to clients, which include travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, outside consultants, and other reimbursable expenses. These reimbursable expenses are as follows (in thousands):

        Our normal payment terms are 30 days from invoice date. For fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, our average days sales outstanding (DSOs) were 109 days and 107 days, respectively. We calculate DSOs by dividing the sum of our accounts receivable and unbilled services balance, net of deferred revenue, at the end of the fiscal quarter by average daily revenues. Average daily revenues are calculated by dividing quarter revenues by the number of days in a quarter. Our project managers and finance personnel monitor payments from our clients and assess any collection issues. We maintain accounts receivable allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our clients to make required payments. We base our estimates on our historical collection experience, current trends, and credit policy. In determining these estimates, we examine historical write-offs of our receivables and review client accounts to identify any specific customer collection issues. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payment, additional allowances may be required. A failure to estimate accurately the accounts receivable allowances and ensure that payments are received on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. As of November 24, 2007 and November 25, 2006, $10.6 million and $6.3 million, was provided for accounts receivable allowances, respectively.

        Share-Based Compensation Expense.    We adopted SFAS No. 123R, "Share-Based Payments" in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 using the modified prospective application method and began accounting for our equity-based compensation using a fair value based recognition method. Under the fair value recognition requirements of SFAS No. 123R, share-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we followed the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB No. 25 to account for our employee stock options. Historically, all stock options have been granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recognized for option grants to employees

29

and directors. However, compensation expense was recognized in connection with the issuance of stock options to non-employee consultants.

        We recognize share-based compensation expense using the straight-line attribution method under SFAS No. 123R. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of share-based awards. Option valuation models require the input of assumptions, including the expected life of the share-based awards, the expected stock price volatility, the risk-free interest rate, and the expected dividend yield. The expected volatility and expected life are based on our historical experience. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury interest rates whose term is consistent with the expected life of the share-based award. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends and have no current plans to do so in the future. We will update these assumptions if changes are warranted. The forfeiture rate is based upon historical experience. As required by SFAS No. 123R, we adjust the estimated forfeiture rate based upon our actual experience.

        Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.    We account for our acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". Goodwill represents the purchase price of acquired businesses in excess of the fair market value of net assets acquired. Intangible assets consist principally of non-competition agreements, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related estimated lives of the agreements (eight to ten years), as well as customer relationships, backlog, trade names, and property leases, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their remaining useful lives (one to ten years).

        In accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not subject to amortization, but monitored annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment. Any impairment would be measured based upon the fair value of the related asset based on the provisions of SFAS No. 142. Because we have one reporting segment, under SFAS No. 142, we utilize the entity-wide approach for assessing goodwill for impairment and compare our market value to our net book value to determine if an impairment exists. There were no impairment losses related to goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented. If we determine through the impairment review process that goodwill has been impaired, we would record the impairment charge in our consolidated statement of income. The net amount of goodwill was approximately $152.2 million as of November 24, 2007. The goodwill amount for the acquisitions is initially recorded based upon a preliminary estimated purchase price allocation and is subject to change. Any preliminary purchase price allocation is based upon our estimate of fair value, and is finalized as we receive other information relevant to the acquisition, such as exit costs related to lease obligations.

        We assess the impairment of amortizable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important that could trigger an impairment review include the following:

•

a significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;



•

a significant change in the manner of our use of the acquired asset or the strategy for our overall business;



•

a significant negative industry or economic trend; and



•

our market capitalization relative to net book value.

        If we were to determine that an impairment review is required, we would review the expected future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the assets. If we determine that the carrying value of intangible assets may not be recoverable, we would measure any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. The net amount of intangible assets was approximately $7.0 million as of November 24, 2007, which includes approximately

30

$1.5 million related to the BBG acquisition, $1.7 million related to the ECL acquisition, and $1.8 million related to the Lee & Allen acquisition.

        Accounting for Income Taxes.    We record income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized based upon anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

        Our financial statements contain certain deferred tax assets and liabilities that result from temporary differences between book and tax accounting, as well as net operating loss carryforwards. SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We evaluate the weight of all available evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The decision to record a valuation allowance requires varying degrees of judgment based upon the nature of the item giving rise to the deferred tax asset. As a result of operating losses incurred in certain of our foreign subsidiaries, and uncertainty as to the extent and timing of profitability in future periods, we recorded valuation allowances in certain of these foreign subsidiaries based on the facts and circumstances affecting each subsidiary. Had we not recorded these allowances of $319,000 and $60,000 in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively, we would have reported a lower effective tax rate than that recognized in our statements of income in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006. If the realization of deferred tax assets in the future is considered more likely than not, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period such determination was made. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable is based on significant estimates, and it is possible that changes in these estimates in the near term could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

        Our effective tax rate may vary from period to period based on changes in estimated taxable income or loss, changes to the valuation allowance, changes to federal, state, or foreign tax laws, future expansion into areas with varying country, state, and local income tax rates, deductibility of certain costs and expenses by jurisdiction, and as a result of acquisitions. Our effective tax rate was 39.0% in fiscal 2007 and 42.9% in fiscal 2006. Our effective tax rate was negatively impacted in fiscal 2006 by a limitation on deducting certain executive officer compensation in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2007 was positively impacted by a $1.8 million tax benefit associated with the Advanced Pricing agreement that we entered into with the Internal Revenue Service and Inland Revenue.

        The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in several different tax jurisdictions. We are periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, we record estimated reserves for probable exposures. Based on our evaluation of current tax positions, we believe we have appropriately accrued for probable exposures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and

31

measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We adopted FIN 48 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. We do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material impact on our consolidated statements of income and financial condition.

        In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "EITF") reached a conclusion on EITF Issue No. 06-3 "How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement". The scope of EITF Issue No. 06-3 includes any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer, and may include, but is not limited to, sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes. The EITF Issue No. 06-3 requires that the presentation of taxes on either a gross basis (included in revenues and costs) or a net basis (excluded from revenues) is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed. We collect goods and services and value added taxes from customers and records these amounts on a net basis, which is within the scope of EITF Issue No. 06-3. We adopted EITF Issue No. 06-3 in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-3 did not have any impact on our consolidated statement of income or financial condition.

        In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements". SFAS 157 enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities using fair value. Prior to the issuance of SFAS 157, guidance for applying fair value was incorporated in several accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 provides a single definition of fair value, together with a framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about fair value measurements. While SFAS 157 does not add any new fair value measurements, it does change current practice. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted SFAS 157 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. We have determined that the adoption of SFAS 157 will not have a material impact on our consolidated statement of income or financial condition.

        In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". SFAS 159 allows entities to measure financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected must be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option can be applied instrument by instrument, however the election is irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 159 would have on our consolidated statements of income and financial condition.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, "Business Combinations". SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to record all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their respective acquisition-date fair values, changes the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, changes the recognition and measurement of contingent consideration, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS 141R also requires additional disclosure of information surrounding a business combination, such that users of the entity's financial statements can fully understand the nature and financial impact of the business combination. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which is our fiscal 2010. An entity may not apply it before that date. The provisions of SFAS 141R will only impact us if we are party to a business combination after the pronouncement has been adopted.

32

Results of Operations

        The following table provides operating information as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:

Fiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006

        Revenues.    Revenues increased $44.8 million, or 12.8%, to $394.6 million for fiscal 2007 from $349.9 million for fiscal 2006. The increase in revenues is due primarily to an increased demand for our services in our chemicals and petroleum, energy and environment, and competition practices, as well as the transfer pricing practice that reflected the BBG acquisition, which occurred at the beginning of the third quarter of fiscal 2006. Other factors contributing to the increase in revenues are increased billing rates for our employee consultants, which were phased in at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2007, and to a lesser extent, an increase in client reimbursable expenses. Client reimbursable expenses, excluding NeuCo, increased $9.1 million and carry little to no margin. Our business consulting revenues grew approximately 25% from fiscal 2006, which was due primarily to our chemicals and petroleum, and energy and environment practices, offset partially by a decrease in our pharmaceuticals practice. Our chemicals and petroleum practice grew nearly 55%, due to an increase in demand for our services, particularly in the Middle East, and the continued expansion of our London-based operations. Our energy and environment practice increased more than 15% from fiscal 2006, due primarily to continued strength in projects related to environmental, energy, and climate issues. Our pharmaceuticals practice decreased more than 25% from fiscal 2006, due primarily to a decrease in demand for our services related to the completion of two large client engagements. Our litigation and applied economics revenues grew approximately 10% from fiscal 2006, which was due to an increase in revenues primarily in our transfer pricing practice area, which benefited from the BBG acquisition. Our competition practice grew by nearly 10% during fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006, and continues to be our largest practice in terms of revenue. Our intellectual property practice decreased more than 5% from fiscal 2006 as the result of project delays. Our finance revenues grew more than 5% during fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006 due to demand for our services in securities and litigation matters. Our

33

forensic accounting practice grew approximately 30% from fiscal 2006 due to a major international arbitration engagement and preparations for further arbitration matters that are scheduled to go to hearings during fiscal 2008. Overall, revenues outside of North America represented approximately 27% of revenues for fiscal 2007, compared with 24% of revenues for fiscal 2006. The growth in revenue in our international offices is primarily due to an increase in demand in our chemicals and petroleum practice, largely in the Middle East.

        The total number of employee consultants increased to 771 at the end of fiscal 2007 from 733 at the end of fiscal 2006, which is primarily due to continued hiring and recruiting efforts. Utilization was 75% for fiscal 2007 compared with 78% for fiscal 2006. Revenues derived from fixed-price engagements increased to 6.6% of total revenues for fiscal 2007 compared with 5.3% for fiscal 2006.

        Costs of Services.    Costs of services increased $28.6 million, or 13.2%, to $246.0 million for fiscal 2007 from $217.4 million for fiscal 2006. The increase was due mainly to an increase in compensation expense for our employee consultants of $20.8 million, excluding NeuCo, attributable primarily to an increase in the average number of employee consultants. Our average number of employee consultants increased because of the BBG acquisition, as well as continued recruiting and hiring efforts. Excluding NeuCo, reimbursable expenses increased $9.1 million, or 22.2%, to $50.0 million for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2007 from $40.9 million for the fiscal year ended November 25, 2006. These increases were partially offset by the effect of the deconsolidation of NeuCo. As a percentage of revenues, cost of services increased to 62.3% for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2007 from 62.1% for the fiscal year ended November 25, 2006.

        Prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we classified our internal information technology group's labor costs as an element of "cost of services". In recent years, the information technology group gradually became less involved in client projects and more focused on internal systems. Accordingly, we recorded these costs that are not billable to clients to "selling, general and administrative expenses" in all periods presented. The effect of this reclassification was to increase the fiscal year ended November 25, 2006 gross margin by $3.9 million. For the fiscal year ended November 24, 2007, the information technology group expenses totaled $4.4 million. This classification has no effect on income from operations or net income.

        Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $15.3 million, or 18.1%, to $99.9 million for fiscal 2007 from $84.5 million for fiscal 2006. Excluding NeuCo, a portion of the increase is due to the increases in commissions to non-employee experts of $4.5 million. Also contributing to the increase are increases in rent expense of $4.0 million, compensation expense of $2.5 million, travel expenses of $2.2 million, and recruiting fees of $1.6 million, which resulted from increased spending in corporate marketing, business development, staff training, and recruiting to support our revenue growth targets in the future. These increases were partially offset by a decrease due to the effect of the deconsolidation of NeuCo. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general, and administrative expenses increased to 25.3% for fiscal 2007 from 24.2% for fiscal 2006. This increase is due primarily to increases in commissions to non-employee experts and rent expense, offset partially by the effect of the deconsolidation of NeuCo.

        Interest Income.    Interest income increased by $0.4 million to $5.5 million for fiscal 2007 from $5.1 million for fiscal 2006. Despite lower cash and equivalent balances, this increase was due to higher average interest rates. Our weighted average interest rate yield for the fiscal year ended November 24, 2007 on our average cash and cash equivalent balances was approximately 4.8% compared with approximately 4.1% for the fiscal year ended November 25, 2006.

        Interest Expense.    Interest expense decreased by $0.1 million to $3.3 million for fiscal 2007 from $3.4 million for fiscal 2006. Interest expense primarily represents interest incurred on the 2.875%, $90.0 million convertible debt, and the amortization of debt issuance costs.

        Other Income (Expense).    Other expense increased by $0.2 million to $0.4 million for fiscal 2007 from $0.2 million for fiscal 2006. Other expense consists primarily of foreign currency exchange

34

transaction gains and losses. We continue to manage our foreign currency exchange exposure through frequent settling of intercompany account balances and by self-hedging movements in exchange rates between the value of the dollar and foreign currencies.

        Provision for Income Taxes.    The provision for income taxes decreased $1.5 million, to $19.7 million for fiscal 2007 from $21.2 million for fiscal 2006. The decrease in the provision is primarily due to a $1.8 million net tax benefit associated with the Advanced Pricing Agreement that we entered into with the Internal Revenue Service and the Inland Revenue, and was partially offset by the effect of $0.3 million of trapped losses in several locations. Our effective income tax rate was 39.0% for fiscal 2007 and 42.9% for fiscal 2006. The higher effective tax rate in fiscal 2006 is primarily due to the limitation on deducting certain executive officer compensation in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

        Minority Interest.    Previously, allocations of the minority share of NeuCo's net income resulted in deductions to our net income, while allocations of the minority share of NeuCo's net loss resulted in additions to our net income. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, as more fully described in Note 1 to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we no longer consolidate NeuCo in our financial statements. Therefore, we no longer record minority interest. Minority interest in the results of operations of NeuCo allocable to its other owners was a net loss of $141,000 for fiscal 2006.

        Equity Method Investment Gain (Loss), Net of Tax.    Starting in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, we began accounting for our investment in NeuCo under the equity method of accounting. Previously, we consolidated NeuCo's financial results. We record our share in the income or losses of NeuCo as equity method investment gain (loss) in the statements of income. For fiscal 2007, our equity in the profits of NeuCo was $1.8 million, net of income tax. This includes approximately $2.1 million after income tax, which represents our share of a $10.0 million benefit related to the licensing of intellectual property rights by NeuCo. For fiscal 2006, our equity in the losses of NeuCo was $0.5 million, net of income tax, which includes our share of a $1.1 million legal settlement, which NeuCo recorded as an expense after the completion of its acquisition of Pegasus.

        Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, Net of Tax.    We adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation Number 47 ("FIN 47"), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations", effective during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, as more fully described in Note 6 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result of adopting FIN 47, we recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change that reduced our net income during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 by $398,000, net of tax.

        Net Income.    Net income increased by $5.2 million, or 18.8%, to $32.6 million for fiscal 2007 from $27.4 million for fiscal 2006. Diluted net income per share increased 19.6% to $2.68 per share for fiscal 2007 from $2.24 per share for fiscal 2006. Diluted net income per share increased at a greater rate than net income because diluted weighted average shares outstanding decreased approximately 123,000 shares to approximately 12,149,000 shares for fiscal 2007 from approximately 12,272,000 shares for fiscal 2006. The decrease in diluted weighted average shares outstanding for fiscal 2007 is primarily a result of repurchases of common stock during fiscal 2007 under our share repurchase programs.

Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005

        Revenues.    Revenues increased $54.4 million, or 18.4%, to $349.9 million for fiscal 2006 from $295.5 million for fiscal 2005. This growth is due primarily to an increased demand for our services, as well as the Lee & Allen acquisition, which occurred during the latter part of the second quarter of fiscal 2005, the ECL acquisition, which occurred during the third quarter of fiscal 2005, and the BBG acquisition, which occurred at the beginning of the third quarter of fiscal 2006. These increases were partially offset by the deconsolidation of NeuCo, which occurred at the beginning of the third quarter of fiscal 2006. Our litigation revenues grew nearly 30% from fiscal 2005, which was largely driven by a greater demand for our services primarily in our finance, competition, and intellectual property practice

35

areas, and the addition of our forensic accounting and computing practice areas in the second quarter of fiscal 2005. In addition, our transfer pricing practice benefited from almost two full quarters of revenues from the BBG acquisition. Our finance practice increased more than 25%, our competition practice grew more than 15%, and our intellectual property practice grew more than 10% from fiscal 2005. Our business consulting revenues grew nearly 10% from fiscal 2005, which was due primarily to our chemicals and petroleum practice, and our pharmaceuticals practice, offset partially by a decrease in our energy and environment practice. Our chemicals and petroleum practice grew nearly 30%, due to an increase in demand for our services, particularly in the Middle East, and the continued expansion of our London-based operations. Our energy and environment practice decreased approximately 10% from fiscal 2005, due primarily to a decrease in demand for our services. Overall, revenues outside of the U.S. represented approximately 24% of total revenues for fiscal 2006, compared with 19% of total revenues for fiscal 2005. The growth in revenue in our foreign offices is due primarily to the acquisitions of Lee & Allen and ECL and the increase in demand in our chemicals and petroleum practice, largely in the Middle East.

        The total number of employee consultants increased to 733 at the end of fiscal 2006 from 663 at the end of fiscal 2005, which is due to the BBG acquisition during fiscal 2006, as well as continued hiring and recruiting efforts. Increased billing rates for our employee consultants, which were phased in beginning in early December 2005, also contributed to our revenue growth. Utilization was 78% for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. Revenues derived from fixed-price engagements decreased to 5.3% of total revenues for fiscal 2006 compared with 6.5% for fiscal 2005.

        Costs of Services.    Costs of services increased $46.1 million, or 26.9%, to $217.4 million for fiscal 2006 from $171.3 million for fiscal 2005. The increase was due mainly to an increase in compensation expense for our employee consultants of $40.5 million, which includes $3.4 million of share-based compensation expense due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Excluding share-based compensation expense, the increase in compensation expense was $37.1 million. This increase was primarily due to an increase of approximately $19.4 million in the compensation we pay our employee consultants and an increase of approximately $17.7 million due to an increase in the average number of employee consultants. Our average number of employee consultants increased because of the BBG acquisition, along with the effect of a full year of ECL and Lee & Allen headcount during fiscal 2006, as well as continued recruiting and hiring efforts. Reimbursable expenses increased $5.6 million, or 15.8%, to $41.2 million for fiscal 2006 from $35.6 million for fiscal 2005. As a percentage of revenues, cost of services increased to 62.1% for fiscal 2006 from 58.0% for fiscal 2005. Of the 4.1% increase as a percentage of revenues, approximately 3.4% was due primarily to higher compensation expense for our employee consultants resulting from increased competition in the marketplace and a higher proportion of our revenue being sourced internally, the cost of which is included in cost of services. Of the increase in compensation expense for our employee consultants nearly half is offset by the decrease in commissions to non-employee experts, the cost of which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Also, of the increase as a percentage of revenues, approximately 1.0% was due to the effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R and other share-based compensation expense recognized in fiscal 2006.

        Prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we classified our internal information technology group's labor costs as an element of "cost of services". In recent years, the information technology group gradually became less involved in client projects and more focused on internal systems. Accordingly, we recorded these costs that are not billable to clients to "selling, general and administrative expenses" in all periods presented. The effect of this reclassification was to increase the fiscal years ended November 25, 2006 and November 26, 2005 gross margin by $3.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. This classification has no effect on income from operations or net income.

        Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $4.6 million, or 5.7%, to $84.5 million for fiscal 2006 from $80.0 million for fiscal 2005. Largely because of the BBG acquisition in fiscal 2006 and the ECL and Lee & Allen acquisitions in fiscal 2005, we experienced an increase in overall compensation to our administrative staff of

36

$4.1 million, an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $0.9 million, and an increase in rent expense $0.6 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in commissions to non-employee experts of $3.1 million. In addition, included in the increase in compensation expense for our administrative staff is share-based compensation expense of $1.1 million due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Selling, general, and administrative expenses also includes approximately $0.6 million in office closure costs for our Mexico City office incurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses was also due to our need to support a larger and more complex global company. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased to 24.2% for fiscal 2006 from 27.1% for fiscal 2005. This decrease is due primarily to lower commissions to non-employee experts and the deconsolidation of NeuCo. In addition, revenue increased at a greater rate than the increases in other selling, general, and administrative expenses, including rent and other costs that are principally fixed in nature.

        Interest Income.    Interest income increased by $2.9 million to $5.1 million for fiscal 2006 from $2.1 million for fiscal 2005. This increase was due to higher average interest rates, combined with higher cash balances from our June 2005 public stock offering and cash generated from operations. Our weighted average imputed interest rate for fiscal 2006 on our average cash and cash equivalent balances was approximately 4.1% annualized compared with approximately 2.7% annualized for fiscal 2005.

        Interest Expense.    Interest expense remained flat at $3.4 million for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. Interest expense primarily represents interest incurred on the 2.875%, $90.0 million convertible debt, and the amortization of debt issuance costs.

        Other Income (Expense).    Other expense was $203,000 for fiscal 2006 versus other income of $221,000 for fiscal 2005. Other expense consists primarily of foreign currency exchange transaction gains and losses. We continue to manage our foreign currency exchange exposure through frequent settling of intercompany account balances and by self-hedging movements in exchange rates between the value of the dollar and foreign currencies.

        Provision for Income Taxes.    The provision for income taxes was $21.2 million for fiscal 2006, including $1.0 million from the limitation on deducting certain executive officer compensation in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. This is an increase of $2.7 million from the fiscal 2005 provision for income taxes of $18.5 million. Our effective income tax rate was 42.9% for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2006 reflects the tax benefit of losses from closing our Mexico City office, a reduction of previously accrued foreign tax expense, additional valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of our New Zealand subsidiary and the limitation on deducting certain executive officer compensation in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Our effective tax rate in fiscal 2005 reflects the valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax assets of our New Zealand subsidiary because of a change in the estimated losses in that tax jurisdiction.

        Minority Interest.    Previously, allocations of the minority share of NeuCo's net income resulted in deductions to our net income, while allocations of the minority share of NeuCo's net loss resulted in additions to our net income. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, as more fully described in Note 1 to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we no longer consolidate NeuCo in our financial statements. Therefore, we no longer record minority interest. Minority interest in the results of operations of NeuCo allocable to its other owners was a net loss of $141,000 for fiscal 2006, compared with net income of $59,000 for fiscal 2005.

        Equity Method Investment Gain (Loss), Net of Tax.    Through NeuCo's acquisition of Pegasus, as more fully described in Note 1 to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, our interest in NeuCo has been reduced from 49.7% as of November 26, 2005, to 36.4% as of November 25, 2006. As a result, we began accounting for our investment in NeuCo under the equity method of accounting.

37

Prior to this event, we consolidated NeuCo's financial results. We record our share in the income or losses of NeuCo as equity method investment gain (loss) in the statements of income. For fiscal 2006, our equity in the losses of NeuCo was $529,000, net of tax, which includes our share of a $1.1 million legal settlement, which NeuCo recorded as an expense after the completion of its acquisition of Pegasus.

        Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, Net of Tax.    We adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation Number 47 ("FIN 47"), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations", effective during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, as more fully described in Note 6 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result of adopting FIN 47, we recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change that reduced our net income during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 by $398,000, net of tax.

        Net Income.    Net income increased by $2.8 million, or 11.6%, to $27.4 million for fiscal 2006 from $24.6 million for fiscal 2005. Diluted net income per share increased 5.2% to $2.24 per share for fiscal 2006 from $2.13 per share for fiscal 2005. Net income increased at a greater rate than diluted net income per share because diluted weighted average shares outstanding increased 708,000 shares to approximately 12,272,000 shares for fiscal 2006 from approximately 11,564,000 shares for fiscal 2005. The increase in diluted weighted average shares outstanding for fiscal 2006 is primarily a result of the public offering of our common stock completed in June 2005, shares issued in connection with the Lee & Allen, ECL, and BBG acquisitions, and stock option exercises occurring during fiscal 2006. These increases are offset slightly by a decrease in common stock equivalents due primarily to repurchases from our share repurchase program, employee stock options, and shares underlying our convertible debt.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        General.    In fiscal 2007, we had a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $31.1 million. We completed the year with cash and cash equivalents of $100.5 million, and working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) of $149.6 million.

        On June 29, 2005, we completed a public offering of 1,899,227 shares of our common stock at a price of $53.75 per share. Of the 1,899,227 shares sold, 710,000 shares were offered by us and 1,189,227 came from selling shareholders. We received net proceeds of approximately $35.9 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. As part of the offering, we received additional net proceeds of approximately $2.6 million from the exercise of 138,187 options by the selling shareholders. The net proceeds from the offering were intended to be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital and possible acquisitions of and investments in complementary businesses.

        On May 23, 2006, we acquired certain assets of BBG for $27.9 million (after adding acquisition costs, additional contingent purchase payments, and transaction fees paid or accrued). The $27.9 million purchase price consisted of $22.9 million in cash and $5.0 million in shares of our common stock, which carry restrictions with respect to when they can be sold. On June 16, 2005 and April 27, 2005, we completed the acquisitions of ECL and Lee & Allen, respectively. Upon acquisition, we paid approximately $27.7 million (after deducting cash acquired, and adding acquisition costs, additional contingent purchase payments, and transaction fees paid or accrued) in cash and $8.5 million in shares of our common stock, which carry restrictions with respect to when they can be sold. We funded the cash portion of the purchase price of the BBG, ECL and Lee & Allen acquisitions from existing cash resources.

        We believe that current cash balances, cash generated from operations, and amounts available under our bank line of credit will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.

38

        Sources and Uses of Cash in Fiscal 2007.    During fiscal 2007, net cash provided by operations was $30.9 million. The sources of cash in operations include net income of $32.6 million, a decrease in deferred income taxes of $3.2 million, share-based compensation expense of $5.5 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $10.2 million, and an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities of $6.8 million. The sources of cash in operations were offset by increases in unbilled services of $3.2 million, prepaid expenses and other assets of $7.0 million, and accounts receivable of $14.7 million.

        We used $20.7 million of net cash for investing activities during fiscal 2007, which included $11.1 million for capital expenditures, $7.2 million for the payment of additional consideration relating to acquisitions, and $2.4 million for payments on notes receivables.

        We used $41.6 million of cash for financing activities during fiscal 2007. Cash used in financing activities was primarily used to repurchase 1,187,185 shares of our common stock for approximately $57.5 million in cash. In June 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a multi-year share repurchase program of up to a total of 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. This is in addition to our prior share repurchase program of 500,000 shares that was announced in July 2006, the primary purpose of which was to offset the dilutive impact of stock options and restricted share grants that have been or may be granted to employees, independent directors, and non-employee consultants. We have now repurchased all shares authorized by the 500,000 share repurchase program and 915,235 of the shares authorized by the 1,500,000 share repurchase program. The common stock repurchases were partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $11.7 million, $2.5 million from excess tax benefits on share-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123R, and $2.2 million from collections on receivables from shareholders.

        Private Placement of Convertible Debt.    In 2004, we completed a private placement of $90.0 million of 2.875% convertible senior subordinated debentures due 2034. The debentures are our direct, unsecured senior subordinated obligations and rank junior in right of payment to our existing bank line of credit and any future secured indebtedness that we may designate as senior indebtedness. Interest of approximately $1.3 million is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15.

        As a result of our election on December 14, 2004, we must settle the conversion of the debentures, as follows: (i) $1,000 in cash per $1,000 principal amount of debentures converted; and (ii) in cash or shares of our common stock (at our further election, except for cash in lieu of fractional shares), any conversion obligation that exceeds the principal amount of the debentures converted.

        Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the debentures, since the closing stock price did not equal or exceed the $50 per share contingent conversion trigger price for 20 out of 30 consecutive trading days ending on November 24, 2007, the market price conversion trigger was not satisfied and holders of the debentures are not able to exercise their right to convert the bonds during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The last reported sales price of our common stock was less than $50 per share for more than ten days in the thirty consecutive trading day period ending on the last day of our first quarter of fiscal 2008. Because of this occurrence, holders of the debentures may not convert them during our second fiscal quarter ending on May 9, 2008. This test is repeated each fiscal quarter. To date, no conversions have occurred. We believe that in the event the contingent conversion trigger price is met, it is unlikely that a significant percentage of bondholders will exercise their right to convert because the debentures have traded at a premium over their conversion value. Since the holders of the debentures are not able to exercise their right to convert the bonds as of November 24, 2007, we have classified the $90.0 million convertible debt as long-term debt as of November 24, 2007, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Our revolving line of credit to borrow up $90.0 million expires on April 30, 2010 and it is our intention to renew or replace the line of credit, as desirable and available, which would allow us to continue to classify our convertible debentures as long-term debt, rather than short-term in future years. In addition, the line of credit gives us additional flexibility to meet any unforeseen financial requirements.

39

        As early as June 15, 2011 or upon certain specified fundamental changes, we may be required to repurchase all or any portion of the debentures, at the option of each holder, which, in the event of a fundamental change involving a change of control of our firm, may include the payment of a make-whole premium.

        Borrowings under the Revolving Line of Credit.    We are party to a senior loan agreement with our bank for a $90.0 million revolving line of credit with a maturity date of April 30, 2010. Subject to the terms of the agreement, we may use borrowings under this line of credit for acquisition financing, working capital, general corporate purposes, letters of credit, and foreign exchanges contracts. The available line of credit is reduced, as necessary, to account for certain letters of credit outstanding. The $90.0 million credit facility allows us to mitigate the potential liquidity risk, and to provide funding if required, in the event of conversion by the debenture holders. Funds available under the expanded facility will allow us to continue to classify up to $90.0 million of our convertible debentures as long-term debt, rather than short-term, and will give us additional flexibility to meet any unforeseen financial requirements. There were no amounts outstanding under this line of credit as of November 24, 2007, and the line of credit then available was $86.6 million, reduced for letters of credit outstanding.

        Borrowings under our credit facility bear interest, at our option, either at LIBOR plus an applicable margin or at the prime rate. Applicable margins range from 0.75% to 1.50%, depending on the ratio of our consolidated total debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, for the preceding four fiscal quarters, subject to various adjustments stated in the senior loan agreement. These margins are adjusted both quarterly and each time we borrow under the credit facility. Interest is payable monthly. A commitment fee of 0.165% is payable on the unused portion of the credit facility. Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by 100% of the stock of certain of our U.S. subsidiaries and by 65% of the stock of our foreign subsidiaries, amounting to net assets of approximately $92.2 million as of November 24, 2007.

        Debt Restrictions.    Under our senior credit agreement, we must comply with various financial and non-financial covenants. The financial covenants require us to maintain a minimum consolidated working capital of $25.0 million and require us to comply with a consolidated total debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 3.5 to 1.0 and a consolidated senior debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 2.0 to 1.0. Compliance with these financial covenants is tested on a fiscal quarterly basis. The definition of "current liabilities" included in the working capital covenant of the senior credit agreement excludes any convertible subordinated debt for which we have not been notified of the intention to convert. The non-financial covenants of the senior credit agreement place restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, engage in acquisitions or dispositions, and enter into business combinations. We also may not pay dividends or repurchase our common stock if there is a stated event of default or the issuance of dividends or repurchase of our common stock would create an event of default. Any indebtedness outstanding under the senior credit facility may become immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of stated events of default, including our failure to pay principal, interest or fees or a violation of any financial covenant.

        As of November 24, 2007, we were in compliance with our covenants under the senior credit agreement.

        Other Matters.    As part of our business, we regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire other consulting firms, practices or groups or other businesses. In recent years, we have typically paid for acquisitions with cash, or a combination of cash and our common stock, and we may continue to do so in the future. To pay for an acquisition, we may use cash on hand, cash generated from our operations or borrowings under our revolving credit facility, or we may pursue other forms of financing. Our ability to secure short-term and long-term debt or equity financing in the future will depend on several factors, including our future profitability, the levels of our debt and equity, restrictions under our existing line of credit and the overall credit and equity market environments.

40

        In June 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to a total of 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. We will finance the repurchase program with available cash and cash from future operations. We may repurchase shares in open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable insider trading and other securities laws and regulations. To date, we have repurchased 915,235 shares under this plan for approximately $43.5 million. In addition, we repurchased 257,051 shares under our prior share repurchase program for approximately $13.2 million during fiscal 2007. We expect to continue to repurchase shares under the share repurchase program.

        Contingencies.    In connection with the acquisitions we completed in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2004, we agreed to pay additional consideration, for up to five years following the transactions, if specific performance targets are met. These payments are generally required to be made in cash, and in some cases are to be paid in shares of our common stock. During fiscal 2005, CRA recorded an additional $1.1 million of purchase price related to acquisitions, which was paid in cash and common stock during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2006, CRA recorded $1.5 million in additional purchase price related to these acquisitions, which included promissory notes and common stock. The promissory notes were paid during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2007, CRA recorded an additional $7.6 million of purchase price related to these acquisitions, of which $5.8 million was paid in cash and $0.6 million was paid in common stock during fiscal 2007 and $1.2 million will be paid in cash during fiscal 2008. We believe that we will have sufficient funds to satisfy any obligations related to the contingent consideration. We expect to fund these contingent cash payments, if any, from existing cash resources, cash generated from operations, or financing transactions.

        Impact of Inflation.    To date, inflation has not had a material impact on our financial results. There can be no assurance, however, that inflation will not adversely affect our financial results in the future.

Contractual Obligations

        The following table presents information about our known contractual obligations as of November 24, 2007. It does not reflect contractual obligations that may have arisen or may arise after that date. Except for historical facts, the information in this section is forward-looking information.

(1)

As set forth in the indenture governing the convertible debentures, the debenture holder must wait until June 2011 to redeem the debentures and, in the absence of our stock price reaching $50 per share for a specified period of time prior to June 2011, to convert the debenture to our shares,

41

with the principal amount of the debenture to be settled with cash. In addition, interest of approximately $1.3 million, is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15. We will also be required to pay contingent interest on the applicable interest payment date to the holders of the debentures for the period commencing June 20, 2011, and ending December 14, 2011, if the average trading price of the debentures for each of the last five trading days immediately preceding June 20, 2011, equals 125% or more of the principal amount of the debentures. Thereafter, we will pay contingent interest on the interest payment date for a six-month interest period if the average trading price of the debentures during the five trading day period immediately preceding the first day of the applicable six-month interest period equals or exceeds 125% of the principal amount of the debentures. The contingent interest payable per debenture will equal 0.25% of the average trading price of such debenture during the applicable five trading day reference period.

(2)

Acquisitions we completed in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2004 involve contingent consideration. Any additional payments related to these contingencies will be accounted for as additional goodwill. Payment of the additional consideration is generally contingent upon the acquired companies reaching certain revenue targets. The milestones associated with the contingent consideration must be reached beginning in fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2011. Since it is not possible to estimate if or when the acquired companies will reach performance milestones, or the amount of contingent consideration based on future revenues, the maximum contingent consideration has not been included in the table above.

        We are party to standby letters of credit with two financial institutions in support of the minimum future lease payments under leases for permanent office space and bonds required per the terms of certain limited project proposals amounting to $3.6 million as of November 24, 2007.

Factors Affecting Future Performance

        Item 1A of this annual report sets forth risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report. If any of these risks, or any risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not significant, develops into an actual event, then our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Foreign Exchange Risk

        The majority of our operations are based in the U.S., and accordingly, the majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, we have foreign-based operations where transactions are denominated in foreign currencies and are subject to market risk with respect to fluctuations in the relative value of foreign currencies. Our primary foreign currency exposures relate to our short-term intercompany balances with our foreign subsidiaries and accounts receivable and cash valued in the United Kingdom in U.S. dollars. Our primary foreign subsidiaries have functional currencies denominated in the British pound, Australian dollar, and Euro, and foreign denominated assets and liabilities are remeasured each reporting period with any exchange gains and losses recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. We manage our foreign currency exchange exposure through frequent settling of intercompany account balances and by self-hedging movements in exchange rates between the value of the dollar and foreign currencies. Based on currency exposures existing at November 24, 2007, a hypothetical 10% movement in foreign exchange rates would not expose us to significant gains or losses in earnings or cash flows. We continue to manage our foreign currency exchange exposure through frequent settling of intercompany account balances and by self-hedging movements in exchange rates between the value of the dollar and foreign currencies. In addition, we may use derivative instruments to manage the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. However, at

42

November 24, 2007, we had no outstanding derivative instruments. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

        We maintain an investment portfolio consisting mainly of investment grade money market funds, corporate obligations and government obligations with a weighted average maturity of less than one year. These held-to-maturity securities are subject to interest rate risk. However, a hypothetical change in the interest rate of 10% would not have a material impact to the fair values of these securities at November 24, 2007 primarily due to their short maturity and our intent to hold the securities to maturity.

Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        We have included our consolidated financial statements in this annual report starting on page FS-1. We have provided an index to our consolidated financial statements on Page FS-1.

Item 9—Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

        Not applicable.

Item 9A—Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that we record, process, summarize and report the information we must disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.

Evaluation of Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

        Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we have determined that, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, materially our internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

        Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report based on the framework in "Internal Control—Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

        Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report on their assessment of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The attestation report is included herein.

43

Important Considerations

        The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate over time. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of CRA International, Inc.

        We have audited CRA International, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of November 24, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). CRA International, Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        In our opinion, CRA International, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 24, 2007, based criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

44

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of November 24, 2007 and November 25, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and shareholders' equity for each of the years in the two-year period ended November 24, 2007, and our report dated February 4, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

45

Item 9B—Other Information

        None.

46

PART III

        We have omitted the information required in Part III of this annual report because we intend to include that information in our definitive proxy statement for our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, which we expect to file before 120 days after the end of fiscal 2007. We incorporate that information in this annual report by reference to our 2008 proxy statement.

Item 10—Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

        We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the sections captioned "Executive Officers and Directors", "Corporate Governance", and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our 2008 annual proxy statement.

Item 11—Executive Compensation

        We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the section captioned "Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers" in our 2008 annual proxy statement.

Item 12—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

        We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the sections captioned "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plans" in our 2008 annual proxy statement.

Item 13—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

        We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the sections captioned "Transactions with Related Parties" and "Corporate Governance" in our 2008 annual proxy statement.

Item 14—Principal Accountant Fees and Services

        We incorporate the information required by this item by reference to the section captioned "Principal Accountant Fees and Services" in our 2008 annual proxy statement.

47

PART IV

Item 15—Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

        (a)    Financial Statements, Schedules, and Exhibits.    We have listed our consolidated financial statements filed as part of this annual report in the index to consolidated financial statements on page FS-1. We have listed the exhibits filed as part of this annual report in the accompanying exhibit index, which follows the signature page to this annual report.

        (b)    Exhibits.    We have listed the exhibits filed as part of this annual report in the accompanying exhibit index, which follows the signature page to this annual report.

        (c)    Financial Statement Schedules.    We have omitted all financial statement schedules because they are not applicable or not required or because we have included the necessary information in our consolidated financial statements or related notes.

48

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

49

EXHIBIT INDEX

50

*

Management contract or compensatory plan.

        Where a numbered note follows an exhibit number, we incorporate that exhibit by reference to the similarly named document filed as an exhibit to the following documents:

(1)

Our registration statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-46941.



(2)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed June 20, 2007.



(3)

Our registration statement on Form S-8 filed April 21, 2006.



(4)

Our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 14, 2004.



(5)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed December 15, 2004.



(6)

Our registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-118691.



(7)

Our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 10, 2002.



(8)

Our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 3, 2004.

51

(9)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed April 24, 2007.



(10)

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 27, 2004.



(11)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed April 27, 2006.



(12)

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 25, 2006.



(13)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2007.



(14)

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 26, 2005.



(15)

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 25, 2000.



(16)

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2002.



(17)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed November 1, 2006.



(18)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed May 13, 2003.



(19)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed June 16, 2005.



(20)

Our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 20, 2004.



(21)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed April 1, 2005.



(22)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed June 24, 2005.



(23)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed April 19, 2006.



(24)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2006.



(25)

Our current report on Form 8-K filed May 22, 2007.

52

CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FS-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of CRA International, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CRA International, Inc. as of November 24, 2007 and November 25, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and shareholders' equity for each of the fiscal years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of CRA International, Inc. at November 24, 2007 and November 25, 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of CRA International, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of November 24, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 4, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Boston, Massachusetts
February 4, 2008

FS-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of CRA International, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, cash flows and shareholders' equity of CRA International, Inc. for the year ended November 26, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash flows of CRA International, Inc. for the year ended November 26, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Boston, Massachusetts
February 6, 2006

FS-3

CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financials statements.

FS-4

CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financials statements.

FS-5

CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS