-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
-
»
Quarter Report: 2010 May (Form 10-Q)
CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 May (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended May 14, 2010 |
or |
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 000-24049
CRA International, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts |
|
04-2372210 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
200 Clarendon Street, T-33, Boston, MA |
|
02116-5092 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(617) 425-3000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer ý |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at June 17, 2010 |
Common Stock, no par value per share |
|
11,057,209 shares |
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
CRA International, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Weeks Ended |
|
Twenty-four
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
68,075 |
|
$ |
71,974 |
|
$ |
126,921 |
|
$ |
137,795 |
|
Costs of services |
|
|
50,055 |
|
|
47,790 |
|
|
90,509 |
|
|
90,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
18,020 |
|
|
24,184 |
|
|
36,412 |
|
|
46,936 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
17,475 |
|
|
18,496 |
|
|
33,269 |
|
|
35,764 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
3,919 |
|
|
418 |
|
|
7,490 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
79 |
|
|
88 |
|
|
158 |
|
|
245 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
(1,669 |
) |
|
(2,101 |
) |
Loss on the extinguishment of convertible debentures |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
(29 |
) |
|
(425 |
) |
|
(29 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
49 |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(2,157 |
) |
|
2,978 |
|
|
(1,622 |
) |
|
5,585 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
577 |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
141 |
|
|
(4,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
1,184 |
|
|
(1,481 |
) |
|
1,530 |
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
|
|
57 |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
224 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to CRA International, Inc. |
|
$ |
(1,523 |
) |
$ |
1,166 |
|
$ |
(1,257 |
) |
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to CRA International, Inc: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
0.11 |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
0.11 |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
10,683 |
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
10,683 |
|
|
10,683 |
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14, 2010 |
|
November 28, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
38,636 |
|
$ |
82,806 |
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
41,349 |
|
|
23,678 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $7,226 in 2010 and $6,812 in 2009 |
|
|
50,094 |
|
|
60,200 |
|
|
Unbilled services |
|
|
27,848 |
|
|
28,022 |
|
|
Escrowed deposit |
|
|
10,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
11,338 |
|
|
18,381 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
16,984 |
|
|
16,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
196,506 |
|
|
229,782 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
17,137 |
|
|
19,050 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
138,951 |
|
|
141,964 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4,774 in 2010 and $5,205 in 2009 |
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
6,162 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion |
|
|
57 |
|
|
63 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
15,219 |
|
|
25,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
371,629 |
|
$ |
422,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
8,323 |
|
$ |
13,425 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
33,566 |
|
|
56,951 |
|
|
Deferred revenue and other liabilities |
|
|
6,871 |
|
|
7,002 |
|
|
Current portion of deferred compensation |
|
|
135 |
|
|
889 |
|
|
Current portion of notes payable |
|
|
700 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
465 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
50,060 |
|
|
79,092 |
|
Notes payable, net of current portion |
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
2,405 |
|
Convertible debentures payable, net |
|
|
46,309 |
|
|
60,289 |
|
Deferred rent and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
13,040 |
|
|
13,964 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
1,524 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of current portion |
|
|
7,752 |
|
|
9,122 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 10,739,869 and 10,639,249 shares issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009,
respectively |
|
|
103,712 |
|
|
102,392 |
|
|
Receivables from employees |
|
|
(1,551 |
) |
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
155,532 |
|
|
156,789 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(8,199 |
) |
|
(3,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CRA International, Inc. shareholders' equity |
|
|
249,494 |
|
|
254,112 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders' equity |
|
|
250,516 |
|
|
255,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
|
$ |
371,629 |
|
$ |
422,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-four
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 14, 2010 |
|
May 15, 2009 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,481 |
) |
$ |
1,530 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities, net of effect of acquired business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,737 |
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
570 |
|
|
Share-based compensation expenses |
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
1,470 |
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of convertible debentures |
|
|
425 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
Noncash interest from discount on convertible debentures |
|
|
609 |
|
|
758 |
|
|
Foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
8,398 |
|
|
10,791 |
|
|
Unbilled services |
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
4,502 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
5,889 |
|
|
(10,601 |
) |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
|
(26,820 |
) |
|
(37,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(9,482 |
) |
|
(21,618 |
) |
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
(871 |
) |
Additional consideration relating to acquisitions, net |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
(594 |
) |
Collections on notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Sale of investments |
|
|
36,310 |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(53,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(19,141 |
) |
|
(1,415 |
) |
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
Tax withholding payment reimbursed by restricted shares |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
(676 |
) |
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
Extinguishment of convertible debentures |
|
|
(14,944 |
) |
|
(6,620 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
(38 |
) |
Repurchase of treasury stock by NeuCo, Inc. |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(15,772 |
) |
|
(7,334 |
) |
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
225 |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(44,170 |
) |
|
(29,903 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
82,806 |
|
|
119,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
38,636 |
|
$ |
89,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
227 |
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
$ |
1,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash financing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares in exchange for notes receivable by NeuCo, Inc. |
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity (unaudited)
(In thousands, except share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRA
International,
Inc.
Shareholders'
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
Issued |
|
Amount |
|
Receivables
from
Shareholders |
|
Retained
Earnings |
|
Noncontrolling
Interest |
|
Total
Shareholders'
Equity |
|
BALANCE AT NOVEMBER 28, 2009 |
|
|
10,639,249 |
|
$ |
102,392 |
|
$ |
(1,854 |
) |
$ |
156,789 |
|
$ |
(3,215 |
) |
$ |
254,112 |
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
$ |
255,715 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
(224 |
) |
|
(1,481 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,984 |
) |
|
(4,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
(4,984 |
) |
|
(6,241 |
) |
|
(224 |
) |
|
(6,465 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
33,875 |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
|
|
592 |
|
Share-based compensation expense for employees |
|
|
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
Restricted share vesting |
|
|
111,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of vested employee restricted shares for tax withholding |
|
|
(34,806 |
) |
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(903 |
) |
Tax deficit on stock options and restricted share vesting |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,099 |
) |
Payments received on notes receivable from shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Shares repurchased |
|
|
(10,021 |
) |
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense for non-employees |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Equity transactions of noncontrolling interest and effect of change in ownership interest in NeuCo, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
(357 |
) |
|
(448 |
) |
Convertible debenture extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT MAY 14, 2010 |
|
|
10,739,869 |
|
$ |
103,712 |
|
$ |
(1,551 |
) |
$ |
155,532 |
|
$ |
(8,199 |
) |
$ |
249,494 |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
$ |
250,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
CRA International, Inc. (the "Company," or "CRA") is a worldwide leading economic, financial, and management consulting services firm that applies advanced analytic techniques and
in-depth industry knowledge to complex engagements for a broad range of clients. CRA offers its services in two broad areas: litigation, regulatory and financial consulting and management
consulting. CRA operates in one business segment, which is consulting services. CRA operates its business under its registered trade name, Charles River Associates.
2. Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Estimates
The condensed consolidated statements of operations for the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and May 15, 2009, the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of May 14, 2010, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and May 15, 2009, and the condensed
consolidated statement of shareholders' equity for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, are unaudited. The November 28, 2009 consolidated balance sheet is derived from
CRA's audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K as of that date and has been adjusted as a result of the Company's adoption of Accounting
Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 470-20, "Debt," formerly FASB Staff Position ("FSP") No. Accounting Principles Board Opinion 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)" during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. In the opinion of management, these statements include all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of CRA's consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make significant estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates in these consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, accounts receivable allowances, revenue recognition on fixed price
contracts, depreciation of property and equipment, share-based compensation, valuation of acquired intangible assets, impairment of long lived assets, goodwill, accrued and deferred income taxes,
valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, accrued compensation, accrued exit costs, and other accrued expenses. These items are monitored and analyzed by the Company for changes in facts and
circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. CRA bases its estimates on historical
experience and various other assumptions that CRA believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates if CRA's assumptions based on past experience or
other assumptions do not turn out to be substantially accurate.
3. Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. In addition, the consolidated financial statements include the Company's
interest in NeuCo, Inc. ("NeuCo"). All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated.
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2010, NeuCo acquired $0.9 million of its outstanding shares. As a result of this transaction, the Company's ownership interest in NeuCo
increased from 49.15% to
7
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
3. Principles of Consolidation (Continued)
55.89%.
Since October of fiscal 2008, CRA's ownership interest constitutes control under GAAP. Therefore, NeuCo's financial results have been consolidated with CRA and the portion of NeuCo's results
allocable to its other owners is shown as "noncontrolling interest." The increase in the Company's ownership in NeuCo during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 has been accounted for as an adjustment
to shareholders' equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued guidance included in ASC Topic 810, "Consolidation" (formerly Statements of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 160). ASC Topic 810
establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as "minority interests") in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, to ensure
consistency with the requirements of ASC Topic 805, "Business Combinations." ASC Topic 810 states that noncontrolling interests should be classified as a separate component of equity, and establishes
reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The Company adopted
the provisions of ASC Topic 810 during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and the new presentation and disclosure requirements were applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
NeuCo's
interim reporting schedule is based on calendar month-ends, but its fiscal year end is the last Saturday of November. The first three quarters of CRA's fiscal year
could include up to
a three-week reporting lag between CRA's quarter end and the most recent financial statements available from NeuCo. CRA does not believe the reporting lag will have a significant impact on
CRA's consolidated statements of operations or financial condition.
4. Fiscal Year
CRA's fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in November, and accordingly, its fiscal year will periodically contain 53 weeks rather than 52 weeks. Both fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009 are 52-week years. In a 52-week year, each of CRA's first, second, and fourth quarters includes twelve weeks, and its third quarter includes sixteen weeks. In a
53-week year, the fourth quarter includes thirteen weeks.
5. Cash Equivalents and Investments
Cash equivalents consist principally of U.S. government obligations, funds holding only U.S. government obligations, money market funds, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances,
certificates of deposit, and corporate obligations with maturities when purchased of three months or less. Short-term investments generally consist of U.S. and Canadian government bonds
and
corporate obligations and have maturities when purchased of more than three months and less than one year. These short-term investments are expected to be
held-to-maturity and are classified as such in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The carrying amounts of these instruments classified as cash
equivalents and short-term investments are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. As of May 14, 2010, short-term investments included
$16.0 million in U.S. government bonds, $20.4 million in corporate obligations, and $4.9 million in Canadian government bonds. Long-term investments, if any, are
intended to be held to maturity, and generally consist of government bonds with maturities of more than one year but less than two years.
8
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. Cash Equivalents and Investments (Continued)
If
a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis of an investment is judged to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the investment is written down
to fair value. For those investments for which the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost, the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairment
losses is recognized in earnings while the noncredit-related portion is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of related taxes. The Company does not intend to sell such investments, if any,
and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell such investments prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit losses. During the twelve and
twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, the Company did not write-down any investment balances.
6. Revenue Recognition
CRA derives substantially all of its revenues from the performance of professional services. The contracts that CRA enters into and operates under specify whether the engagement will be
billed on a time-and-materials or a fixed-price basis. These engagements generally
last three to six months, although some of CRA's engagements can be much longer in duration. Each contract must be approved by one of CRA's vice presidents.
CRA
recognizes substantially all of its revenues under written service contracts with its clients where the fee is fixed or determinable, as the services are provided, and only in those
situations where collection from the client is reasonably assured and sufficient contractual documentation has been obtained. In certain cases CRA provides services to its clients without sufficient
contractual documentation, or fees are tied to performance-based criteria, which require the Company to defer revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In these cases, these amounts are fully
reserved until all criteria for recognizing revenue are met.
Most
of CRA's revenue is derived from time-and-materials service contracts. Revenues from time-and-materials service contracts are
recognized as services are provided based upon hours worked and contractually agreed-upon hourly rates, as well as a computer services fee based upon hours worked.
Revenues
from the majority of the Company's fixed-price engagements are recognized on a proportional performance method based on the ratio of costs incurred, substantially all of which
are labor-related, to the total estimated project costs. CRA derived 19.1% and 17.4% of revenues from fixed-price engagements in the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010,
respectively. CRA derived 11.9% and 10.9% of revenues from fixed-price engagements in the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, respectively. Project costs are based on
the direct salary of the consultants on the engagement plus all direct expenses incurred to complete the engagement that are not reimbursed by the client. The proportional performance method is used
since reasonably dependable estimates of the revenues and costs applicable to various stages of a contract can be made, based on historical experience and terms set forth in the contract, and are
indicative of the level of benefit provided to CRA's clients. Fixed-price contracts generally include a termination provision that converts the agreement to a
time-and-materials contract in the event of termination of the contract. CRA's management maintains contact with project managers to discuss the status of the projects and, for
fixed-price engagements, management is updated on the budgeted costs and resources required to complete the project. These budgets are then used to calculate revenue recognition and to estimate the
9
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
6. Revenue Recognition (Continued)
anticipated
income or loss on the project. CRA has occasionally been required to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete projects, which have resulted in lower than anticipated income or
losses on those contracts. CRA may experience similar situations in the future. Provisions for estimated losses on contracts are made during the period in which such losses become probable and can be
reasonably estimated. To date, such losses have not been significant.
Revenues
also include reimbursable expenses, which include travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, outside consultants, and other reimbursable expenses.
Reimbursable expenses are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Weeks Ended |
|
Twenty-four
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
$ |
8,871 |
|
$ |
9,825 |
|
$ |
17,137 |
|
$ |
18,744 |
|
CRA
maintains accounts receivable allowances for estimated losses resulting from clients' failure to make required payments. The Company bases its estimates on historical collection
experience, current trends, and credit policy. In determining these estimates, CRA examines historical write-offs of its receivables and reviews client accounts to identify any specific
customer collection issues. If the financial condition of CRA's customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payment, or if disputes were to arise regarding the
services provided, additional allowances may be required.
Unbilled
services represent revenue recognized by CRA for services performed but not yet billed to the client. Deferred revenue represents amounts billed or collected in advance of
services rendered.
CRA
collects goods and services and value added taxes from customers and records these amounts on a net basis, which is within the scope of ASC Topic 605-45, "Principal Agent
Considerations."
7. Goodwill
Goodwill represents the purchase price of acquired businesses in excess of the fair market value of net assets acquired. In accordance with ASC Topic 350, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," goodwill is not subject to amortization, but is monitored at least annually for impairment, or more frequently, as necessary, if there are other indicators of impairment. Any impairment would
be measured based upon the fair value of the related asset. Under ASC Topic 350, in performing the first step of the goodwill impairment testing and measurement process, the Company compares its
entity-wide estimated fair value to its net book value to identify potential impairment. Management estimates the entity-wide fair value utilizing the Company's market
capitalization, plus an appropriate control premium. The Company utilizes a control premium which considers appropriate industry, market and other pertinent factors, including indications of such
premiums from data on recent acquisition transactions. If the Company determines through the impairment evaluation process that goodwill has been impaired, an impairment charge would be recorded in
the consolidated statement of operations. The Company completed the annual impairment test required as of November 28, 2009 and determined that there was no impairment. The Company will
continue to closely monitor its market capitalization and in the event that the Company's average stock price subsequently declines and its
10
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. Goodwill (Continued)
market
capitalization plus an estimated control premium declines below net book value and remains below book value for a period we consider to be other-than-temporary, the
Company will perform an evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangibles.
The
changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at November 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
141,964 |
|
Goodwill adjustments related to acquisitions |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Goodwill adjustments related to NeuCo |
|
|
1,191 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation and other adjustments |
|
|
(4,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 14, 2010 |
|
$ |
138,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Private Placement of Convertible Debt
In 2004, CRA completed a private placement of $90.0 million of 2.875% convertible senior subordinated debentures due in 2034. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company
repurchased convertible debentures in the principal amount of $15.0 million, on the open market. During fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, the Company repurchased convertible debentures in the
principal amount of approximately $27.5 million, on the open market. As of May 14, 2010, the principal amount of the convertible debentures totaled $47.5 million. The debentures
are CRA's direct, unsecured senior subordinated obligations and rank junior in right of payment to CRA's existing bank revolving line of credit and any future secured indebtedness that CRA may
designate as senior indebtedness. Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the debentures, since the closing stock price did not equal or exceed the $50 per share contingent conversion trigger
price for 20 out of the 30 consecutive trading days ended on May 14, 2010, the market price conversion trigger was not satisfied and holders of the debentures are not able to exercise their
right to convert the bonds during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. This test is repeated each fiscal quarter. To date, no conversions have occurred.
The
$46.3 million convertible debt balance as of May 14, 2010 represents the principal amount of $47.5 million, net of the unamortized debt discount totaling
$1.2 million. The $60.3 million convertible debt balance as of November 28, 2009 represents the principal amount of $62.5 million, net of the unamortized debt discount
totaling $2.2 million. The debt discount will be amortized through the third quarter of fiscal 2011. For both the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and the year ended fiscal 2009, the carrying
amount of the equity component of the convertible debentures was $7.6 million and is included in common stock.
The
effective interest rate for the twelve weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twelve weeks ended May 15, 2009 was 5.6% and 5.5%, respectively. The effective interest rate for
the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009 was 5.5% and 5.4%, respectively.
For
the twelve weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twelve weeks ended May 15, 2009, the contractual interest, amortization of prepaid debt issuance costs, and amortization of
the discount, included in interest expense was $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively. For the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the
twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, the contractual interest,
11
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
8. Private Placement of Convertible Debt (Continued)
amortization
of prepaid debt issuance costs, and amortization of the discount, included in interest expense was $1.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
The
Company has a $60.0 million revolving line of credit, to mitigate the potential liquidity risk, and to provide funding if required, in the event of conversion by the debenture
holders. The amounts available under the bank revolving line of credit are constrained by various financial covenants and reduced by certain outstanding letters of credit. The revolving line of credit
expires on April 30, 2012. CRA believes that in the event the contingent conversion trigger price is met, it is unlikely that a significant percentage of bondholders will exercise their right
to convert because the debentures have traded at a premium over their conversion value. CRA has classified the $46.3 million convertible debt as long-term debt as of May 14,
2010 in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the line of credit gives CRA additional flexibility to meet any unforeseen financial requirements.
CRA
may elect to redeem all or any portion of the debentures on or after June 20, 2011, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures, plus accrued
and unpaid interest. As early as June 15, 2011 or upon certain specified fundamental changes, we may be required, at the option of each holder, to repurchase all or any portion of the
debentures, which, in the event of a fundamental change involving a change of control of our firm, may include the payment of a make-whole premium. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010,
the Company will reclassify the amount of outstanding debentures from a non-current liability to a current liability.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued guidance included in ASC Topic 470-20, which changes the accounting treatment for convertible debt instruments that allow for either mandatory or
optional cash settlements. The new provisions of ASC Topic 470-20 require the Company to recognize non-cash interest expense on the convertible senior subordinated debentures
based on the market rate for similar debt instruments without the conversion feature. Upon retroactive adoption of ASC 470-20 during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded
a cumulative after tax adjustment for prior years of $6.4 million, which represented a non-cash decrease in retained earnings as of November 28, 2009. Also, the carrying
amount of the convertible debentures was retroactively adjusted to reflect a discount of approximately $12.6 million and a reduction of deferred financing costs of approximately
$0.5 million, with offsetting increases in common stock of approximately $6.9 million and deferred tax liability of $5.2 million as of the date of issuance. The effect of adopting
ASC Topic 470-20 is included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
The
contingent interest feature included in the debenture represents an embedded derivative that must be recorded at fair value. The Company has determined that the fair value of the
contingent interest feature is de minimis as of May 14, 2010, based upon economic, market and other conditions in effect as of that date. There
are no other embedded derivatives associated with the Company's convertible debentures.
The
Company has agreed with the debenture holders to reserve the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued upon conversion of the debentures.
12
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. Net Income per Share
Basic net income per share represents net income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share represents
net income divided by the weighted average shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents arise from stock options, unvested restricted
shares, and shares underlying CRA's debentures using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the Company will receive for the share awards, the amount of compensation
cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in common stock when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to
repurchase shares at the average share price for each fiscal period. A reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Weeks Ended |
|
Twenty-four
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
10,683 |
|
|
10,581 |
|
Common stock equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
10,683 |
|
|
10,683 |
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since
CRA is obligated to settle the par value of the convertible debentures in cash, the Company is not required to include any shares underlying the convertible debentures in its
diluted weighted average shares outstanding until the average stock price per share for the quarter exceeds the $40 conversion price and only to the extent of the additional shares CRA may be required
to issue in the event CRA's conversion obligation exceeds the principal amount of the debentures converted. At such time, only the number of shares that would be issuable (under the "treasury" method
of accounting for share dilution) are included, which is based upon the amount by which the average stock price exceeds the conversion price. Since the average stock price was $24.68 and $25.41 for
the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, respectively, no common stock equivalents for
shares underlying the debentures were included in the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. Since the average stock
price was $21.09 and $22.79 for the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, respectively, no common stock equivalents for shares underlying the debentures were included in
the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009.
For
the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, all common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding
because they were anti-dilutive. For the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, the anti-dilutive share based awards were 1,174,915 and 1,169,810,
respectively. The anti-dilutive share based awards include approximately 143,000 and 163,000 common stock equivalents for the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14,
2010, respectively, that were anti-dilutive because the Company had a net loss. For the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009 the anti-dilutive
share based awards were 990,054 and 962,853, respectively.
13
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
9. Net Income per Share (Continued)
During
the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, CRA granted restricted share awards representing 87,193 and 95,402 shares, respectively, of its common
stock that were not vested as of May 14, 2010.
10. Comprehensive Income
A reconciliation of comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-four
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,481 |
) |
$ |
1,530 |
|
Change in foreign currency translation |
|
|
(4,984 |
) |
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(6,465 |
) |
$ |
1,729 |
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
224 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CRA International, Inc. |
|
$ |
(6,241 |
) |
$ |
1,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Income Taxes
The Company's effective income tax rate was a benefit of 26.8% and a provision of 60.2% for the twelve weeks ended May 14, 2010 and May 15, 2009, respectively. The
effective tax benefit for the twelve weeks ended May 14, 2010 was lower than the statutory rate due to losses in foreign locations that could not be benefited. The effective income tax rate in
the twelve weeks ended May 15, 2009 was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to losses in foreign locations that provided no tax benefit.
The
effective income tax rate was a benefit of 8.7% and a provision of 72.6% for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and May 15, 2009, respectively. The
effective income tax benefit for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 was lower than the statutory rate primarily due to losses in foreign locations that could not be benefited.
The effective tax rate in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2009 was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to losses in foreign locations that provided no tax benefit and a
tax charge associated with the liquidation of the Company's Australian-based operations.
14
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
12. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
November 28,
2009 |
|
Compensation and related expenses |
|
$ |
25,816 |
|
$ |
47,010 |
|
Payable to former shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
1,254 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
627 |
|
|
859 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,467 |
|
|
6,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,566 |
|
$ |
56,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Commitments & Contingencies
In connection with an acquisition completed in fiscal 2009, CRA agreed to pay incentive performance awards to certain employees of the acquired business, if specific performance targets
are met in fiscal 2010 through fiscal 2012. In addition, in connection with an acquisition completed during fiscal 2006, CRA agreed to pay additional consideration, contingent upon the achievement of
specific performance targets. CRA believes that it will have sufficient funds to satisfy any obligations related to the incentive performance awards and contingent consideration. CRA expects to fund
these payments, if any, from existing cash resources, cash generated from operations, or financing transactions.
In
May 2009, a payment of $10.3 million was placed in escrow as a progress payment related to a possible future earnout amount that the seller of a business CRA acquired in fiscal
2006 could earn. The $10.3 million is included in current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 14, 2010. Unless the term of this agreement is
extended, CRA expects the entire $10.3 million placed in escrow to be returned to the Company within the next 12 months.
14. Restructuring Charges
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company incurred pre-tax expenses of $5.0 million associated principally with employee workforce reductions and office
space reductions designed to reduce costs, increase utilization, and better align staffing levels with revenue. The following is a summary of the restructuring charges
incurred:
-
- The Company completed an employee workforce reduction, which was designed to better align its workforce with revenue.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded $4.4 million in employee separation costs and other compensation, of which $3.8 million is included in costs of sales and
$0.6 million is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
-
- During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company closed its Houston, Texas office. The Company recorded expense for
the difference between its future minimum lease payments and related exit costs from the date of closure through the end of the remaining lease term, net of expected future sublease rental income.
This estimated expense required management to make assumptions regarding the estimate of the duration of future vacancy periods, the amount and timing of future settlement payments, and the amount and
timing of potential sublease income.
15
Table of Contents
CRA International, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Unaudited)
14. Restructuring Charges (Continued)
This
resulted in charges of $1.0 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, of which $1.0 million is included in selling, general and administrative expenses and $31,000 is
included in depreciation and amortization.
-
- During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company reversed $0.4 million in previously recorded restructuring
costs related to the divestiture of the Capital Projects practice, the reduction of office space in Boston, Massachusetts, and employee separation charges, of which $0.1 million is included in
costs of sales and $0.3 million is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
The
reserve balance for the fiscal year to date period ended May 14, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divested
Operations |
|
Office
Vacancies |
|
Employee
Workforce
Reduction |
|
Total
Restructuring |
|
Balance at November 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
55 |
|
$ |
2,158 |
|
$ |
1,266 |
|
$ |
3,479 |
|
Charges incurred in the fiscal year to date period ended May 14, 2010 |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
966 |
|
|
4,160 |
|
|
5,042 |
|
Amounts paid in the fiscal year to date period ended May 14, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
(2,821 |
) |
|
(3,589 |
) |
Adjustments and effect of foreign currency translation in the fiscal year to date period ended May 14, 2010 |
|
|
218 |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
(34 |
) |
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 14, 2010 |
|
$ |
189 |
|
$ |
2,305 |
|
$ |
2,571 |
|
$ |
5,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the fiscal year to date period ended May 15, 2009, the Company recorded $3.2 million in restructuring charges associated principally with an employee workforce
reduction and employee separation costs, of which $1.9 million is included in costs of sales and $1.3 million is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The
restructuring expenses for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2009 and the reserve balance for the quarter ended May 14, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divested
operations |
|
Office
Vacancies |
|
Employee
Workforce Reduction |
|
Total
Restructuring |
|
Balance at November 29, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
318 |
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
$ |
3,313 |
|
Charges incurred in the fiscal year to date period ended May 15, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
3,228 |
|
Amounts paid in the fiscal year to date period ended May 15, 2009 |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
(412 |
) |
|
(3,266 |
) |
|
(4,586 |
) |
Adjustments and effect of foreign currency translation in the fiscal year to date period ended May 15, 2009 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
286 |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 15, 2009 |
|
$ |
123 |
|
$ |
494 |
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Except for historical facts, the statements in this quarterly report are forward- looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
merely our current predictions of future events. These statements are inherently uncertain, and actual events could differ materially from our predictions. Important factors that could cause actual
events to vary from our predictions include those discussed below under the heading "Risk Factors." We assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements to reflect new information or
developments. We urge readers to review carefully the
risk factors described in this quarterly report and in the other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. You can read these documents at www.sec.gov.
Our
principal internet address is www.crai.com. Our website provides a link to a third-party website through which our annual, quarterly, and current reports, and amendments to those
reports, are available free of charge. We believe these reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them electronically with, or furnish them to, the SEC. We do not
maintain or provide any information directly to the third-party website, nor do we check the accuracy of this website.
Our
website also includes information about our corporate governance practices. The Investor Relations page of our website provides a link to a web page where you can obtain a copy of
our code of ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer.
Economic Conditions
Our business has been affected by the global economic recession, as clients for some of our larger litigation cases requested us to
slow down the pace of work, and some of our management consulting clients delayed new projects. We continue to focus on business development and client-facing activities, including recruiting
senior-level consultants. However, in order to more closely align our costs and staffing levels with our revenue, additional actions were required. These actions were carefully targeted so as not to
jeopardize longer-term growth prospects in both our core and emerging practices. We completed a series of initiatives during fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 to reduce consultant
headcount and eliminate support staff positions. These initiatives include reducing our workforce, consolidating, reducing, moving, or closing some of our offices, divesting some of our
underperforming practices, and eliminating other expenses based on an evaluation of our current administrative practices and infrastructure. For additional information on these initiatives, refer to
Note 14 in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make significant estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates in these condensed consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, accounts receivable allowances, revenue recognition on fixed
price contracts, depreciation of property and equipment, share-based compensation, valuation of acquired intangible assets, impairment of long lived assets, goodwill, accrued and deferred income
taxes, valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, accrued compensation, accrued exit costs, and other accrued expenses. These items are monitored and analyzed by management for changes in facts and
circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future.
17
Table of Contents
Changes
in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from our estimates if our assumptions based on past experience or our other assumptions do not turn out to be substantially accurate.
A
summary of the accounting policies that we believe are most critical to understanding and evaluating our financial results is set forth below. This summary should be read in
conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 1 of this quarterly report, as well as in our most recently filed annual report on
Form 10-K.
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable Allowances. We derive substantially all of our revenues from the performance of professional
services.
The contracts that we enter into and operate under specify whether the engagement will be billed on a time-and-materials or fixed-price basis. These engagements generally last
three to six months, although some of our engagements can be much longer in duration. Each contract must be approved by one of our vice presidents.
We
recognize substantially all of our revenues under written service contracts with our clients where the fee is fixed or determinable, as the services are provided, and only in those
situations where collection from the client is reasonably assured and sufficient contractual documentation has been obtained. In certain cases we provide services to our clients without sufficient
contractual documentation, or fees are tied to performance-based criteria, which require us to defer revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In
these cases, where we invoice clients, these amounts are fully reserved until all criteria for recognizing revenue are met.
Most
of our revenue is derived from time-and-materials service contracts. Revenues from time-and-materials service contracts are
recognized as the services are provided based upon hours worked and contractually agreed-upon hourly rates, as well as a computer services fee based upon hours worked.
Revenues
from the majority of our fixed-price engagements are recognized on a proportional performance method based on the ratio of costs incurred, substantially all of which are
labor-related, to the total estimated project costs. Project costs are based on the direct salary of the consultants on the engagement plus all direct expenses incurred to complete the engagement that
are not reimbursed by the client. The proportional performance method is used since reasonably dependable estimates of the revenues and costs applicable to various stages of a contract can be made,
based on historical experience and terms set forth in the contract, and are indicative of the level of benefit provided to our clients. Our fixed-price contracts generally include a termination
provision that reduces the agreement to a time-and-materials contract in the event of termination of the contract. Our management maintains contact with project managers to
discuss the status of the projects and, for fixed-price engagements, management is updated on the budgeted costs and resources required to complete the project. These budgets are then used to
calculate revenue recognition and to estimate the anticipated income or loss on the project. In the past, we have occasionally been required to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete
projects, which have resulted in lower than anticipated income or losses on those contracts. We may experience similar situations in the future. Provisions for estimated losses on contracts are made
during the period in which such losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. To date, such losses have not been significant.
18
Table of Contents
Revenues
also include reimbursable expenses, which include travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, outside consultants, and other reimbursable expenses.
Reimbursable expenses are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Weeks Ended |
|
Twenty-four
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
|
$ |
8,871 |
|
$ |
9,825 |
|
$ |
17,137 |
|
$ |
18,744 |
|
Our
normal payment terms are 30 days from the invoice date. For the twelve weeks ended May 14, 2010, and May 15, 2009 our average days sales outstanding, or DSOs,
were 94 days and 98 days. We calculate DSOs by dividing the sum of our accounts receivable and unbilled services balance, net of deferred revenue, at the end of the quarter by average
daily revenues. Average daily revenues are calculated by dividing quarter revenues by the number of days in a quarter. Our project managers and finance personnel monitor payments from our clients and
assess any collection issues. We maintain accounts receivable allowances for estimated losses resulting from clients' failure to make required payments. We base our estimates on our historical
collection experience, current trends, and credit policy. In determining these estimates, we examine historical write-offs of our receivables and review client accounts to identify any
specific customer collection issues. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate or disputes were to arise regarding the services provided, resulting in an impairment of their
ability to make payment, additional allowances may be required. A failure to estimate accurately the accounts receivable allowances and ensure that payments are received on a timely basis could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. As of May 14, 2010, and November 28, 2009, $7.2 million and $6.8 million were
provided for accounts receivable allowances, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation Expense. Share-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and
is recognized
as expense over the requisite service period of the award. We recognize share-based compensation expense using the straight-line attribution method. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model to estimate the fair value of
share-based awards. Option valuation models require the input of assumptions, including the expected life of the share-based awards, the expected stock price volatility, the risk-free
interest rate, and the expected dividend yield. The expected volatility and expected life are based on our historical experience. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury
interest rates whose term is consistent with the expected life of the share-based award. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends and have
no current plans to do so in the future. We will update these assumptions if changes are warranted. The forfeiture rate is based upon historical experience. We adjust the estimated forfeiture rate
based upon our actual experience. In addition, we have performance based awards that are valued at the fair value of shares as of the grant date and expense is recognized based on the number of shares
expected to vest under the terms of the award under which they are granted. The fair value determination requires significant assumptions, including estimating future revenues and profits.
Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We account for our acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill
represents the
purchase price of acquired businesses in excess of the fair market value of net assets acquired. Intangible assets consist principally of non-competition agreements, which are amortized on
a straight-line basis over the related estimated lives of the agreements (eight to ten years), as well as customer relationships, customer lists, developed technology, and trademarks,
which are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over their remaining useful lives (four to ten years).
19
Table of Contents
The
goodwill amount for acquisitions is initially recorded based upon a preliminary estimated purchase price allocation and is subject to change. Any preliminary purchase price
allocation is based upon our estimate of fair value, and is finalized as we receive other information relevant to the acquisition.
In
accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 350, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other," goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not subject to
amortization, but are monitored annually for impairment, or more frequently, if there are indicators of impairment. Any impairment would be measured based upon the fair value of the related asset.
Under ASC Topic 350, in performing the first step of the goodwill impairment testing and measurement process, we compare our entity-wide estimated fair value to net book value to identify
potential impairment. We estimate the entity-wide fair value utilizing our market capitalization, plus an appropriate control premium. We utilize a control premium which considers
appropriate industry, market and other pertinent factors, including indications of such premiums from data on recent acquisition transactions. If we determine through the impairment evaluation process
that goodwill has been impaired, we would record the impairment charge in our consolidated statement of operations.
We
assess the impairment of amortizable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider
important that could trigger an impairment review include the following:
-
- a significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
-
- a significant change in the manner of our use of the acquired asset or the strategy for our overall business;
-
- a significant negative industry or economic trend; and
-
- our entity-wide fair value relative to net book value.
If
we were to determine that an impairment evaluation is required, we would review the expected future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the assets. If we determine that the
carrying value of intangible assets may not be recoverable, we measure any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be
commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model.
There
were no impairment losses related to goodwill or intangible assets during the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. We will continue to closely monitor our
market capitalization and in the event that our average stock price subsequently declines and our market capitalization plus control premium declines below net book value and remains below book value
for a period we consider to be other-than-temporary, we will perform an evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangibles.
Accounting for Income Taxes. We record income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized based
upon anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases, and
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Our
financial statements contain certain deferred tax assets and liabilities that result from temporary differences between book and tax accounting, as well as net operating loss
carryforwards. ASC Topic 740, "Income Taxes," requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the
20
Table of Contents
likelihood
of realization of deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation
allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We evaluate the weight of all available evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income
tax assets will not be realized. The decision to record a valuation allowance requires varying degrees of judgment based upon the nature of the item giving rise to the deferred tax asset. As a result
of operating losses incurred in certain of our foreign subsidiaries, and uncertainty as to the extent and timing of profitability in future periods, we recorded valuation allowances in certain of
these foreign subsidiaries based on the facts and circumstances affecting each subsidiary. Had we not recorded these allowances, we would have reported a lower effective tax provision than was
recognized in our statements of operations in fiscal 2009 and a higher effective tax benefit during the first twenty-four weeks of fiscal 2010. If the realization of deferred tax assets is
considered more likely than not, an adjustment to the net deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period such determination was made. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered
realizable is based on significant estimates, and it is possible that changes in these estimates could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our
effective tax rate may vary from period to period based on changes in estimated taxable income or loss, changes to the valuation allowance, changes to federal, state, or foreign tax
laws, future expansion into areas with varying country, state, and local income tax rates, deductibility of certain costs, uncertain tax positions, and expenses by jurisdiction, and as a result of
acquisitions.
The
calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in several different tax jurisdictions. We are periodically
reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among
various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, we record estimated reserves for probable exposures. Based on our evaluation of current tax positions,
we believe we have appropriately accrued for probable exposures. The IRS is currently conducting an examination of fiscal 2007. Audit field work is complete and we expect that the examination will be
closed without significant adjustment to our tax liability. Additionally, HM Revenue and Customs is reviewing our UK subsidiary's fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 corporate tax returns. No adjustments have
been proposed and the outcome of this review cannot reasonably be predicted at this time.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In May 2008, the FASB issued guidance included in ASC Topic 470-20, "Debt" (formerly FASB Staff Position No. Accounting
Principles Board Opinion 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)," which changes the accounting
treatment for convertible debt instruments that allow for either mandatory or optional cash settlements. Under ASC Topic 470-20, we are required to recognize non-cash interest
expense on our convertible senior subordinated debentures based on the market rate for similar debt instruments without the conversion feature. ASC Topic 470-20 is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and must be applied on a retrospective basis. Upon retroactive adoption of ASC 470-20 in fiscal 2010 during the first quarter of fiscal
2010, we recorded a cumulative after tax adjustment for prior years of $6.4 million, which represented a non-cash decrease in retained earnings as of November 28, 2009. Also,
the carrying amount of the convertible debentures was retroactively adjusted to reflect a discount of approximately $12.6 million and a reduction of deferred financing costs by approximately
$0.5 million, with offsetting increases in common stock of approximately $6.9 million and deferred tax liability of $5.2 million as of the date of issuance. Under ASC Topic
470-20, in fiscal 2010, we expect to record incremental non-cash interest expense of approximately $1.2 million. The effect of adopting ASC Topic 470-20 is
included in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
21
Table of Contents
In
December 2007, the FASB issued guidance included in ASC Topic 810, "Consolidation" (formerly Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160). ASC Topic 810 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as "minority interests") in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary, to ensure consistency with
the requirements of ASC Topic 805. ASC Topic 810 states that noncontrolling interests should be classified as a separate component of equity, and establishes reporting requirements that provide
sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. We adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 810 during the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 and the new presentation and disclosure requirements were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Upon adoption, certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation, including the reclassification of $1.6 million to shareholders' equity from non-current liabilities.
Results of OperationsFor the Twelve and Twenty-Four Weeks Ended May 14, 2010, Compared to the Twelve and Twenty-Four Weeks Ended
May 15, 2009
The following table provides operating information as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Weeks Ended |
|
Twenty-Four
Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
May 14,
2010 |
|
May 15,
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
Costs of services |
|
|
73.5 |
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
34.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
26.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
5.4 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
5.4 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
(1.5 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of convertible debentures |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
0.1 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
4.1 |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
4.1 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
0.1 |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
1.6 |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
1.1 |
|
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to CRA International, Inc. |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
1.6 |
% |
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Table of Contents
Results of OperationsTwelve Weeks Ended May 14, 2010, Compared to Twelve Weeks Ended May 15, 2009
Revenues. Revenues decreased $3.9 million, or 5.4%, to $68.1 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
$72.0 million
for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Included in revenues are $1.8 million and $2.6 million in revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and the second quarter of fiscal 2009,
respectively, due to the consolidation of NeuCo. Our revenue decline was due primarily to general economic conditions and the restructuring of our portfolio of services, resulting in a reduction of
employee consultant headcount. Utilization decreased to 65% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from 71% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Another factor contributing to our revenue decline, to
a lesser extent, was the decrease in client reimbursable expenses. Client reimbursable expenses are pass-through expenses that carry little to no margin. These decreases in revenue were
partially offset by an increase in revenue due to revenue generated by our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Marakon Associates during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and increased
billing rates for our employee consultants, which went into effect during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Although
revenues increased sequentially $9.2 million, or 15.7%, to $68.1 million from $58.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010, in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010, both our litigation, regulatory, and financial consulting and management consulting areas experienced revenue declines compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Clients have been
reluctant to spend, thus lengthening the time to close new engagements, and this has impacted all areas of our business. Revenue generated by our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
Marakon Associates partially offset our overall revenue decline.
Overall,
revenues outside of the U.S. represented approximately 28% of total revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, compared with 24% of total revenues for the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, which is due primarily to a revenue decline in the U.S. and a greater contribution in international revenue related to the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Marakon
Associates. Revenues derived from fixed-price engagements increased to 19.1% of total revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with 11.9% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The
increase in revenues from fixed-price engagements is due primarily to the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Marakon Associates.
Costs of Services. Costs of services increased $2.3 million, or 4.7%, to $50.1 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010
from
$47.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Included in costs of services are $0.5 million and $1.4 million in costs of services in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and
the second quarter of fiscal 2009, respectively, due to the consolidation of NeuCo. The increase in costs of services is mainly due to an increase in compensation expense for our employee consultants
of $4.2 million, or 11.4%, which includes increases due to the employee consultants we hired as a result of acquiring substantially all of the assets of Marakon Associates, an increase in
restructuring charges, and an increase in fringe benefit costs, primarily due to an unanticipated increase in health claims under our self-insured plan, partially offset by a decrease in
compensation expense due to a decrease in the average number of employee consultants, excluding the Marakon Associates employees, primarily as a result of the previously discussed restructuring
actions. Included in the increase in compensation are $3.7 million and $1.4 million in restructuring charges recognized during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, respectively. Partially offsetting these increases is a decrease in costs of services due to a decrease in client reimbursable expenses. Client reimbursable expenses decreased by
$1.0 million, or 9.7%, to $8.9 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from $9.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. As a percentage of revenues, costs of
services increased to 73.5% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from 66.4% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The increase in costs of services as a percentage of revenue is due primarily to
lower revenue and an increase in compensation expense as a percentage of revenue, attributable to an increase in restructuring charges and an increase in compensation expense for our employee
consultants, partially
23
Table of Contents
offset
by decreases in NeuCo's costs of services as a percentage of revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.0 million, or 5.5%, to
$17.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from $18.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses is due
primarily to a decrease in compensation expense due to a reduction in support staff, a decrease in legal expenses, and a decrease in commissions to non-employee experts. As a percentage of
revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses remained unchanged at 25.7% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased by $0.3 million, or 17.1%, to $1.5 million for the
second
quarter of fiscal 2010 from $1.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The decrease is largely due to a decrease in leasehold improvements and computer equipment due to office closures
and reduced headcount.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased by $9,000 to $79,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from $88,000 for the second
quarter of fiscal
2009. This decrease was due primarily to reduced cash and investment balances.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $250,000 to $799,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from $1.0 million for
the second
quarter of fiscal 2009. Interest expense primarily represents interest incurred on our 2.875% convertible debt, the amortization of debt issuance costs, and the amortization of the discount recorded
in connection with our adoption of ASC Topic 470-20. The decrease was primarily due to the lower principle balance outstanding on our convertible debt in the second quarter of fiscal 2010
compared with the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Loss on Extinguishment of Convertible Debentures. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased convertible
debentures in the
principal amount of $15.0 million, on the open market, resulting in a $0.4 million loss on a pre-tax basis. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company repurchased
convertible debentures in the principal amount of approximately $7.0 million, on the open market, resulting in a $29,000 loss on a pre-tax basis. Although we repurchased our debt at
a discount during these quarters, we incurred non-cash losses on the repurchases under the provisions of ASC Topic 470-20, which required us to discount our debt for the equity
conversion feature of the debt instrument.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) decreased by $139,000 to expense of $90,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from
income of
$49,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Other income (expense) consists primarily of foreign currency exchange transaction gains and losses. We continue to manage our foreign currency exchange
exposure through frequent settling of intercompany account balances and by self-hedging movements in exchange rates between the value of the dollar and foreign currencies and the Euro and
the British pound.
Provision for Income Taxes. The income tax benefit was $0.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Our effective income tax
rate
decreased to an income tax benefit of 26.8% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from an income tax provision of 60.2% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The effective tax benefit for second
quarter of fiscal 2010 was lower than the statutory rate due to losses in foreign locations that could not be benefited. The effective tax provision for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was higher
than the statutory rate primarily due to losses in foreign locations that provided no tax benefit.
24
Table of Contents
Net Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest, Net of Tax. Since October of fiscal 2008, our ownership interest in NeuCo
constitutes
control under GAAP. As a result, NeuCo's financial results are consolidated with ours and allocations of the noncontrolling interest's share of NeuCo's net income result in deductions to our net
income, while allocations of the noncontrolling interest's share of NeuCo's net loss result in additions to our net income. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, NeuCo reacquired
$0.9 million of its shares. As a result of this transaction, our ownership interest in NeuCo increased from 49.15% to 55.89%. The increase in our ownership in NeuCo during the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 has been accounted for as an adjustment to shareholders' equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The results of operations of NeuCo allocable to its other
owners was a net loss of $57,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and net income of $18,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CRA International, Inc. Net income (loss) attributable to CRA International, Inc. decreased
by
$2.7 million from net income of $1.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 to a net loss of $1.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010. The net loss per share was
$0.14 per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to $0.11 of net income per diluted share for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Weighted average shares outstanding increased by
approximately 30,000 shares to approximately 10,713,000 shares for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 from approximately 10,683,000 shares for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The increase in
weighted average shares outstanding is primarily due to restricted shares that have vested and options that have
been exercised since May 15, 2009, offset in part by repurchases of common stock since May 15, 2009. Weighted average shares outstanding as of May 14, 2010 excluded 143,000
anti-dilutive common stock equivalents in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 because we had a net loss and inclusion of these common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
Results of OperationsTwenty-Four Weeks Ended May 14, 2010, Compared to Twenty-Four Weeks Ended May 15, 2009
Revenues. Revenues decreased $10.9 million, or 7.9%, to $126.9 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010
from $137.8 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. Included in revenues are $2.9 million and $4.1 million in revenues in the
twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, respectively, due to the consolidation of NeuCo. Our revenue decline was due
primarily to general economic conditions and the restructuring of our portfolio of services, resulting in a reduction of employee consultant headcount. Utilization decreased to 63% for the
twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from 70% for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. Another factor contributing to our revenue decline, to a lesser
extent, was the decrease in client reimbursable expenses. Client reimbursable expenses are pass-through expenses that carry little to no margin. These decreases in revenue were partially
offset by an increase in revenue due to revenue generated by our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Marakon Associates during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and increased billing
rates for our employee consultants, which went into effect during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
In
the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, our practices in both our litigation, regulatory, and financial consulting and management consulting areas experienced
revenue declines compared to the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. Clients have been reluctant to spend, thus lengthening the time to close new engagements, and this has
impacted all areas of our business. In the management consulting practices, projects completed in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 were not immediately replaced in the first and second quarters of
fiscal 2010. In the litigation, regulatory, and financial consulting practices, work in our current pipeline related to the financial meltdown ramped up slowly and some practices experienced delays in
existing projects proceeding through the court system and regulatory agencies. Revenue generated by our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Marakon Associates partially offset our
overall revenue decline.
25
Table of Contents
Overall,
revenues outside of the U.S. represented approximately 27% of total revenues for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, compared with 23% of total revenues
for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, which is due primarily to a revenue decline in the U.S. and a greater contribution in international revenue related to the acquisition
of substantially all of the assets of Marakon Associates. Revenues derived from fixed-price engagements increased to 17.4% of total revenues for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14,
2010 compared with 10.9% for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. The increase in revenues from fixed-price engagements is due primarily to the acquisition of substantially all
of the assets of Marakon Associates.
Costs of Services. Costs of services decreased $0.4 million, or 0.4%, to $90.5 million for the twenty-four weeks ended
May 14, 2010 from $90.9 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. Included in costs of services are $0.8 million and $2.4 million in costs of
services in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, respectively, due to the consolidation of NeuCo. The decrease
in costs of services is mainly due to a decrease in reimbursable expenses of $1.6 million, or 8.6%. Partially offsetting these decreases are increases in costs of services due to an increase in
compensation expense for our employee consultants of $2.3 million or 3.2%, which includes increases due to the employee consultants we hired as a result of acquiring substantially all of the
assets of Marakon Associates and an increase in restructuring charges, partially offset by a decrease in compensation expense primarily due to a decrease in the average number of employee consultants,
excluding the Marakon Associates employees, primarily as a result of the previously discussed restructuring actions. Included in the increase in compensation are $3.7 million and
$1.9 million in restructuring charges recognized during the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009,
respectively. As a percentage of revenues, costs of services increased to 71.3% for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from 65.9% for the twenty-four weeks ended
May 15, 2009. The increase in costs of services as a percentage of revenue is due to lower revenue in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 compared with the
twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $2.5 million, or 7.0%, to
$33.3 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from $35.8 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. The decrease in selling,
general and administrative expenses is due primarily to a decrease in compensation expense due to a reduction in support staff and a decrease in commissions to non-employee experts. As a
percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased slightly to 26.2% for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from 26.0% for the
twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, which was primarily a result of lower revenue in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 compared with the
twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased by $1.0 million, or 26.0%, to $2.7 million for the
twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from $3.7 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. The decrease is largely due to a decrease in leasehold
improvements and computer equipment due to office closures and reduced headcount.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased by $87,000 to $158,000 for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from $245,000 for
the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. This decrease was due primarily to lower interest rates, reduced cash and investment balances, and more conservative investment holdings.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $432,000 to $1.7 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from
$2.1 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. Interest expense primarily represents interest incurred on our 2.875% convertible debt, the amortization of debt
issuance costs, and the amortization of the discount recorded in connection with our adoption of ASC Topic 470-20. The decrease was primarily due to the lower principle balance outstanding
on our convertible
26
Table of Contents
debt
in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 compared with the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009.
Loss on Extinguishment of Convertible Debentures. During the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, the Company repurchased
convertible debentures in the principal amount of $15.0 million, on the open market, resulting in a $0.4 million loss on a pre-tax basis. During the twenty-four
weeks ended May 15, 2009, the Company repurchased convertible debentures in the principal amount of approximately $7.0 million, on the open market, resulting in a $29,000 loss on a
pre-tax basis. Although we repurchased our debt at a discount during these quarters, we incurred non-cash losses on the repurchases under the provisions of ASC Topic
470-20, which required us to discount our debt for the equity conversion feature of the debt instrument
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) decreased by $84,000 to expense of $104,000 for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14,
2010 from expense of $20,000 for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. Other income (expense) consists primarily of foreign currency exchange transaction gains and losses. The
loss in the twenty-four
weeks ended May 15, 2009 includes a cumulative foreign currency exchange loss of $0.4 million related to the liquidation of our Australian-based operations. We continue to manage our
foreign currency exchange exposure through frequent settling of intercompany account balances and by self-hedging movements in exchange rates between the value of the dollar and foreign
currencies and the Euro and the British pound.
Provision for Income Taxes. The income tax benefit was $0.1 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. Our
effective income tax rate decreased to an income tax benefit of 8.7% for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 compared to an income tax provision of 72.6% for the
twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. The effective tax benefit for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 was lower than the statutory rate due primarily to
losses in foreign locations that provided no tax benefit. The effective tax provision in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2009 was higher than the statutory rate due primarily to
losses in foreign locations that provided no tax benefit and a tax charge associated with the liquidation of our Australian-based operations.
Net Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest, Net of Tax. Since October of fiscal 2008, our ownership interest in NeuCo
constitutes
control under GAAP. As a result, NeuCo's financial results are consolidated with ours and allocations of the noncontrolling interest's share of NeuCo's net income result in deductions to our net
income, while allocations of the noncontrolling interest's share of NeuCo's net loss result in additions to our net income. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, NeuCo reacquired
$0.9 million of its shares. As a result of this transaction, our ownership interest in NeuCo increased from 49.15% to 55.89%. The increase in our ownership in NeuCo during the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 has been accounted for as an adjustment to shareholders' equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The results of operations of NeuCo allocable to its other
owners was a net loss of $224,000 for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and $170,000 for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CRA International, Inc. Net income (loss) attributable to CRA International, Inc. decreased
by
$3.0 million to a net loss of $1.3 million for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from net income of $1.7 million for the twenty-four weeks
ended May 15, 2009. The net loss per share was $0.12 per share for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, compared to diluted net income per share of $0.16 per share for
the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. Weighted average shares outstanding increased by approximately 13,000 shares to approximately 10,683,000 shares for the
twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 from approximately 10,670,000 shares for the twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009. The increase in weighted average shares
outstanding is due primarily to restricted shares that have vested and options that have been exercised since May 15, 2009, offset in part by repurchases of common stock since May 15,
2009. Weighted average shares outstanding for the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 excluded 163,000 anti-dilutive common
27
Table of Contents
stock
equivalents because we had a net loss and inclusion of these common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General. In the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $44.2 million. We completed
the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $38.6 million, short term investments of $41.3 million, and working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) of
$146.4 million.
We
believe that current cash balances, cash generated from operations, and amounts available under our bank line of credit will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital,
capital expenditure, and contingent consideration payment requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Sources and Uses of Cash in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. During the first twenty-four weeks of fiscal
2010, net cash used by operations was $9.5 million. Cash used in operations resulted from a net loss of $1.5 million, as well as decreases in deferred income taxes of
$0.9 million and accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities of $26.8 million, offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization of $2.7 million and
share-based compensation expenses of $3.1 million. The payment of the majority of fiscal 2009 bonuses totaling approximately $28.7 million are included in the decrease in accounts
payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities during the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. The uses of cash in operations were offset by sources of cash including a decrease
in accounts receivable of $8.4 million, as a result of a decrease in revenue and improved collections, and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $5.9 million.
We
used $19.1 million of net cash for investing activities for the first twenty-four weeks of fiscal 2010, which included uses of cash of $1.1 million for
capital expenditures, $0.6 million of net acquisition consideration payments, and $53.8 million to purchase short-term investments to achieve higher returns on our excess
cash. These uses of cash were partially offset by $36.3 million received from the sale of short-term investments.
We
used $15.8 million of net cash for financing activities for the first twenty-four weeks of fiscal 2010. Cash used in financing activities was primarily used to
repurchase convertible debentures in the principal amount of $15.0 million for a repurchase price of approximately $14.9 million and to redeem $0.9 million in vested employee
restricted shares for tax withholdings, offset partially by $0.6 million received upon the exercise of stock options.
Private Placement of Convertible Debt. In 2004, we completed a private placement of $90.0 million of 2.875% convertible senior
subordinated
debentures due in 2034. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we repurchased convertible debentures in the principal amount of $15.0 million, on the open market. During fiscal 2009 and
fiscal 2008, we repurchased convertible debentures in the principal amount of approximately $27.5 million, on the open market. As of May 14, 2010, the principal amount of the convertible
debentures totaled $47.5 million. The debentures are our direct, unsecured senior subordinated obligations and rank junior in right of payment to our existing bank revolving line of credit and
any future secured indebtedness that we may designate as senior indebtedness. Contractual interest of approximately $0.7 million, is payable semi-annually on June 15 and
December 15.
As
a result of our election on December 14, 2004, we must settle the conversion of the debentures, as follows: (i) $1,000 in cash per $1,000 principal amount of debentures
converted; and (ii) in cash or shares of our common stock (at our further election, except for cash in lieu of fractional shares), any conversion obligation that exceeds the principal amount of
the debentures converted.
Pursuant
to the terms of the indenture governing the debentures, since the closing stock price did not equal or exceed the $50 per share contingent conversion trigger price for 20 out of
the 30 consecutive trading days ended on May 14, 2010, the market price conversion trigger was not satisfied
28
Table of Contents
and
holders of the debentures are not able to exercise their right to convert the bonds as of the first trading day of the third quarter of fiscal 2010. This test is repeated each fiscal quarter. To
date, no conversions have occurred. As of May 14, 2010, the principal amount of the convertible debentures totaled $47.5 million. We believe that in the event the contingent conversion
trigger price is met, it is unlikely that a significant percentage of bondholders will exercise their right to convert because the debentures have traded at a premium over their conversion value. We
have classified the $46.3 million convertible debt as long-term debt as of May 14, 2010, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
We
may elect to redeem all or any portion of the debentures on or after June 20, 2011, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures, plus accrued
and unpaid interest. As early as June 15, 2011 or upon certain specified fundamental changes, we may be required, at the option of each holder, to repurchase all or any portion of the
debentures, which, in the event of a fundamental change involving a change of control of our firm, may include the payment of a make-whole premium. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010,
we will reclassify the amounts of outstanding debentures from a non-current liability to a current liability.
Borrowings under the Revolving Line of Credit. We are party to a senior loan agreement with our bank for a $60.0 million revolving
line of
credit with a maturity date of April 30, 2012 and it is our intention to renew or replace the revolving line of credit, as desirable and available. Subject to the terms of the agreement, we may
use borrowings under this revolving line of credit for acquisition financing, working capital, general corporate purposes, letters of credit, and foreign exchanges contracts. The available revolving
line of credit is reduced, as necessary, to account for certain outstanding letters of credit. The $60.0 million credit facility allows us to mitigate the potential liquidity risk, and to
provide funding if required, in the event of conversion by the debenture holders. The revolving line of credit also gives us additional flexibility to meet any unforeseen financial requirements. The
amounts available under our bank revolving line of credit are constrained by various financial covenants and reduced by certain outstanding letters of credit. As of May 14, 2010, there were no
amounts outstanding under this revolving line of credit and $4.6 million in letters of credit were outstanding.
Borrowings
under our credit facility bear interest, at LIBOR plus an applicable margin. Applicable margins range from 2.0% to 3.5%, depending on the ratio of our consolidated total debt
to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, for the preceding four fiscal quarters, subject to various adjustments stated in the senior loan agreement.
These margins are adjusted both quarterly and each time we borrow under the credit facility. Interest is payable monthly. A commitment fee of 0.25% is payable on the unused portion of the credit
facility. Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by 100% of the stock of certain of our U.S. subsidiaries
and 65% of the stock of certain of our foreign subsidiaries, which represents approximately $65.7 million in net assets as of May 14, 2010.
Debt Restrictions. Under our senior loan agreement, we must comply with various financial and non-financial covenants. The financial
covenants require us to maintain a minimum consolidated working capital of $25.0 million and require us to comply with a consolidated total debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 3.5 to 1.0 and
a consolidated senior debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 2.0 to 1.0. Compliance with these financial covenants is tested on a fiscal quarterly basis. In March 2005, we amended the definition of
"current liabilities" included in the working capital covenant of the senior credit agreement to exclude any convertible subordinated debt for which we have not been notified of the intention to
convert. The non-financial covenants of the senior credit agreement place certain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, engage in acquisitions or dispositions, and
enter into business combinations. Any indebtedness outstanding under the senior credit facility may become immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of stated events of
29
Table of Contents
default,
including our failure to pay principal, interest or fees or a violation of any financial covenant. As of May 14, 2010, we were in compliance with our covenants under the senior credit
agreement.
Other Matters. As part of our business, we regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire other consulting firms, practices or groups or
other
businesses. In recent years, we have typically paid for acquisitions with cash, or a combination of cash and our common stock, and we may continue to do so in the future. To pay for an acquisition, we
may use cash on hand, cash generated from our operations, or borrowings under our revolving credit facility, or we may pursue other forms of financing. Our ability to secure short-term and
long-term debt or equity financing in the future, including our ability to refinance our current senior loan agreement, will depend on several factors, including our future profitability,
the levels of our debt and equity, restrictions under our existing revolving line of credit with our bank, and the overall credit and equity market environments.
In
June 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to a total of 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. We will finance the repurchase
program with available cash and cash from future operations. We may repurchase shares in open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable insider trading and
other securities laws and regulations. To date, we have repurchased 1,284,282 shares under this plan for approximately $55.3 million. We did not repurchase shares under this program during the
twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, but expect to continue to repurchase shares in the future.
In
addition, we may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase additional portions of our 2.875% convertible debentures through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities,
in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual
restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
In
May 2009, a payment of $10.3 million was placed in escrow as a progress payment related to a possible future earnout amount that the seller of a business we acquired in fiscal
2006 could earn. The $10.3 million is included in current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 14, 2010. Unless the term of this agreement is
extended, we expect the entire $10.3 million placed in escrow to be returned to us within the next 12 months.
Contingencies. In connection with an acquisition we completed in fiscal 2009, we agreed to pay incentive performance awards, if specific
performance
targets are met in fiscal 2010 through fiscal 2012. In addition, in connection with an acquisition completed during fiscal 2006, we agreed to pay additional consideration, contingent upon the
achievement of specific performance targets. We believe that we will have sufficient funds to satisfy any obligations related to the incentive performance awards and contingent consideration. We
expect to fund these payments, if any, from existing cash resources, cash generated from operations, or financing transactions.
Impact of Inflation. To date, inflation has not had a material impact on our financial results. There can be no assurance, however, that
inflation
will not adversely affect our financial results in the future.
Factors Affecting Future Performance
Part II, Item 1A of this quarterly report sets forth risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report. If any of these risks, or any risks not presently known to us or that we currently
believe are not significant, develops into an actual event, then our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
30
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
The majority of our operations are based in the U.S., and accordingly, the majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S.
dollars. However, we have foreign-based operations where transactions are denominated in foreign currencies and are subject to market risk with respect to fluctuations in the relative value of foreign
currencies. Our primary foreign currency exposures relate to our short-term intercompany balances with our foreign subsidiaries and accounts receivable and cash valued in the United
Kingdom in U.S. dollars. Our primary foreign subsidiaries have functional currencies denominated in the British pound and Euro, and foreign denominated assets and liabilities are remeasured each
reporting period with any exchange gains and losses recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. We continue to manage our foreign currency exchange exposure through frequent settling of
intercompany account balances and by self-hedging movements in exchange rates between the value of the dollar and foreign currencies and the Euro and the British pound. Holding all other
variables constant, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may impact reported revenues and expenses significantly, based on currency exposures at May 14, 2010. A hypothetical 10% movement in
foreign exchange rates would have affected our income (loss) before provision for income taxes for the twelve weeks ended May 14, 2010 by approximately $0.5 million. However, actual
gains and losses in the future could differ materially from this analysis based on the timing and amount of both foreign currency exchange rate movements and our actual exposure.
From
time to time, we may use derivative instruments to manage the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. However, at May 14, 2010, we had no outstanding derivative instruments. We
do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
We maintain an investment portfolio consisting mainly of U.S. government obligations, funds holding only U.S. and Canadian government
obligations, and corporate obligations with maturities of less than a year. These held-to-maturity securities are subject to interest rate risk. However, a hypothetical change
in the interest rate of 10% would not have
a material impact to the fair values of these securities at May 14, 2010 primarily due to their short maturity.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our President and Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that we record, process, summarize and report the
information we must disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
Evaluation of Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, we have determined that, during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have affected, or are reasonably
likely to affect, materially our internal control over financial reporting.
31
Table of Contents
Important Considerations
The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various
inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of human error,
and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and the
risk that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate over time. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures
or internal control over financial reporting will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of
management.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Our operations are subject to a number of risks. You should carefully read and consider the following risk factors, together with all
other information in this report, in evaluating our business. If any of these risks, or any risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not significant, develops into an actual
event, then our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. If that happens, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part
of your investment.
Continuing deterioration of global economic conditions, global market and credit conditions, and regulatory and legislative changes affecting our clients, practice areas,
competitors, or staff could have an impact on our business
Overall global economic conditions and global market and credit conditions in the industries we service have negatively impacted the
market for our services and could continue to do so. A number of factors outside of our control include the availability of credit, the costs and terms of borrowing, merger and acquisition activity,
and general economic factors and business conditions. For example, the current global economic recession has resulted in, and may continue to result in, reduced merger and acquisition activity levels.
Similarly,
many of our clients are in highly regulated industries. Regulatory and legislative changes in these industries could also impact the market for our service offerings and could
render our current service offerings obsolete, reduce the demand for our services, or impact the competition for consulting and expert services. For example, potential changes in the patent laws could
have a significant impact on our intellectual property practice. We are not able to predict the positive or negative effects that future events or changes to the U.S. or international business
environment could have on our operations.
We depend upon key employees to generate revenue
Our business consists primarily of the delivery of professional services, and accordingly, our success depends heavily on the efforts,
abilities, business generation capabilities, and project execution capabilities of our employee consultants. In particular, our employee consultants' personal relationships with our clients are a
critical element in obtaining and maintaining client engagements. If we lose the services of any employee consultant or group of employee consultants, or if our employee consultants
32
Table of Contents
fail
to generate business or otherwise fail to perform effectively, that loss or failure could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. Our employee consultants generated engagements
that accounted for approximately 86% of our revenues in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. Our top five employee consultants generated approximately 14% of our revenues in
the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010.
We
do not have non-competition agreements with the majority of our employee consultants, and they can terminate their relationships with us at will and without notice. The
non-competition and non-solicitation agreements that we have with some of our employee consultants offer us only limited protection and may not be enforceable in every
jurisdiction. In the event that employees leave, some clients may decide that they prefer to continue working with the employee rather than with us. In the event an employee departs and acts in a way
that we believe violates their non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, we will consider any legal remedies we may have against such person on a
case-by-case basis. We may decide that preserving cooperation and a professional relationship with the former employee or client, or other concerns, outweigh the benefits of
any possible legal recovery.
Competition from other economic, litigation support, and management consulting firms could hurt our business
The market for economic, litigation support, and management consulting services is intensely competitive, highly fragmented, and
subject to rapid change. We may be unable to compete successfully with our existing competitors or with any new competitors. In general, there are few barriers to entry into our markets, and we expect
to face additional competition from new entrants into the economic and management consulting industries. In the litigation, regulatory, and financial consulting markets, we compete primarily with
other economic and financial consulting firms and individual academics. In the management consulting market, we compete primarily with other business and management consulting firms, specialized or
industry-specific consulting firms, the consulting practices of large accounting firms, and the internal professional resources of existing and potential clients. Many of our competitors have national
or international reputations as well as significantly greater personnel, financial, managerial, technical, and marketing resources than we do, which could enhance their ability to respond more quickly
to technological changes, finance acquisitions, and fund internal growth. Some of our competitors also have a significantly broader geographic presence and resources than we do.
Our international operations create special risks
Our international operations carry special financial and business risks, including:
-
- greater difficulties in managing and staffing foreign operations;
-
- difficulties in maintaining world-wide utilization levels;
-
- lower margins;
-
- currency fluctuations that adversely affect our financial position and operating results;
-
- unexpected changes in trading policies, regulatory requirements, tariffs, and other barriers;
-
- different practices in collecting accounts receivable;
-
- increased selling, general, and administrative expenses associated with managing a larger and more global organization;
-
- longer sales cycles;
-
- restrictions on the repatriation of earnings;
-
- potentially adverse tax consequences, such as trapped foreign losses;
33
Table of Contents
-
- the impact of differences in the governmental, legal and regulatory environment in foreign jurisdictions, as well as U.S.
laws and regulations related to our foreign operations;
-
- less stable political and economic environments; and
-
- civil disturbances or other catastrophic events that reduce business activity.
We
conduct a portion of our business in the Middle East. At times, the ongoing turmoil in the region could interrupt our business operations in that region and slow the flow of new
opportunities and proposals, which can ultimately affect our revenues and results of operations.
If
our international revenues increase relative to our total revenues, these factors could have a more pronounced effect on our operating results.
Maintaining our professional reputation is crucial to our future success
Our ability to secure new engagements and hire qualified consultants as employees depends heavily on our overall reputation as well as
the individual reputations of our employee consultants and principal non-employee experts. Because we obtain a majority of our new engagements from existing clients, any client that is
dissatisfied with our performance on a single matter could seriously impair our ability to secure new engagements. Given the frequently high-profile nature of the matters on which we work,
including work before and on behalf of government agencies, any factor that diminishes our reputation or the reputations of any of our employee consultants or non-employee experts could
make it substantially more difficult for us to compete successfully for both new engagements and qualified consultants.
Our business could suffer if we are unable to hire and retain additional qualified consultants as employees
Our business continually requires us to hire highly qualified, highly educated consultants as employees. Our failure to recruit and
retain a significant number of qualified employee consultants could limit our ability to accept or complete engagements and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. Relatively few
potential employees meet our hiring criteria, and we face significant competition for these employees from our direct competitors, academic institutions, government agencies, research firms,
investment banking firms, and other enterprises. Many of these competing employers are able to offer potential employees significantly greater compensation and benefits or more attractive lifestyle
choices, career paths, or geographic locations than we can. Competition for these employee consultants has increased our labor costs, and a continuation of this trend could adversely affect our
margins and results of operations.
In
addition, we utilize loans with some of our employees and non-employee experts, other than our executive officers, as a way to attract and retain them. A portion of these
loans are collateralized. Defaults under these loans could have a material adverse affect on our consolidated statements of income, financial condition and liquidity.
Our failure to execute our business strategy or manage future growth successfully could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations
Any failure on our part to execute our business strategy or manage future growth successfully could adversely affect our revenues and
results of operations. In the future, we could open offices in new geographic areas, including foreign locations, and expand our employee base as a result of internal growth and acquisitions. Opening
and managing new offices often requires extensive management supervision and increases our overall selling, general, and administrative expenses. Expansion creates new and increased management,
consulting, and training responsibilities for our employee consultants. Expansion also increases the demands on our internal systems, procedures, and controls, and on our managerial, administrative,
financial, marketing, and other resources. We depend heavily upon the
34
Table of Contents
managerial,
operational, and administrative skills of our executive officers to manage our expansion and business strategy. New responsibilities and demands may adversely affect the overall quality of
our work.
We depend on our non-employee experts
We depend on our relationships with our exclusive non-employee experts. In the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010,
five of our exclusive non-employee experts generated engagements that accounted for approximately 10% of our revenues. We believe that these experts are highly regarded in their fields and
that each offers a combination of knowledge, experience, and expertise that would be very difficult to replace. We also believe that we have been able to secure some engagements and attract
consultants in part because we could offer the services of these experts. Most of these experts can limit their relationships with us at any time for any reason. These reasons could include
affiliations with universities with policies that prohibit accepting specified engagements, the pursuit of other interests, and retirement.
As
of May 14, 2010, we had restrictive covenant contracts, which in some cases include non-competition agreements, with 43 of our non-employee experts. The
limitation or termination of any of their relationships with us, or competition from any of them after
these agreements expire, could harm our reputation, reduce our business opportunities and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. The non-competition agreements that we
have with some of our non-employee experts offer us only limited protection and may not be enforceable in every jurisdiction. In the event that non-employee experts leave, such
clients may decide that they prefer to continue working with the non-employee expert rather than with us. In the event a non-employee expert departs and acts in a way that we
believe violates their non-competition agreement, we will consider any legal remedies we may have against such person on a case-by-case basis. We may decide that
preserving cooperation and a professional relationship with the former non-employee expert or client, or other concerns, outweigh the benefits of any possible legal recovery.
To
meet our long-term growth targets, we need to establish ongoing relationships with additional non-employee experts who have reputations as leading experts in
their fields. We may be unable to establish relationships with any additional non-employee experts. In addition, any relationship that we do establish may not help us meet our objectives
or generate the revenues or earnings that we anticipate.
We depend on our antitrust and mergers and acquisitions consulting business
We derive a significant amount of our revenues from engagements related to antitrust and mergers and acquisitions activities. Any
substantial reduction in the number or size of our engagements in these areas could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations. Adverse changes in general economic conditions,
particularly conditions influencing the merger and acquisition activity of larger companies, could adversely affect engagements in which we assist clients in proceedings before the U.S. Department of
Justice, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, and various foreign antitrust authorities. For example, the current global economic recession has resulted in, and may continue to result in, reduced merger
and acquisition activity levels. These reductions in activity level would adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
We derive our revenues from a limited number of large engagements
We derive a portion of our revenues from a limited number of large engagements. If we do not obtain a significant number of new large
engagements each year, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could suffer. Our ten largest engagements accounted for approximately 13% and 15% of our revenues in the
twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twenty-four weeks ended
35
Table of Contents
May 15,
2009, respectively. No single client accounted for more than 5% of our revenues in the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010 and the twenty-four weeks
ended May 15, 2009. In general, the volume of work we perform for any particular client varies from year to year, and due to the specific engagement nature of our practice, a major client in
one year may not hire us in the following year.
Clients can terminate engagements with us at any time
Many of our engagements depend upon disputes, proceedings, or transactions that involve our clients. Our clients may decide at any time
to seek to resolve the dispute or proceeding, abandon the transaction, or file for bankruptcy. Our engagements can therefore terminate suddenly and without advance notice to us. If an engagement is
terminated unexpectedly, our employee consultants working on the engagement could be underutilized until we assign them to other projects. In addition, because much of our work is project-based rather
than recurring in nature, our consultants' utilization depends on our ability to secure additional engagements on a continual basis. Accordingly, the termination or significant reduction in the scope
of a single large engagement could reduce our utilization and have an immediate adverse impact on our revenues and results of operations.
Acquisitions may disrupt our operations or adversely affect our results
We regularly evaluate opportunities to acquire other businesses. The expenses we incur evaluating and pursuing acquisitions could
adversely affect our results of operations. If we acquire a business, we may be unable to manage it profitably or successfully integrate its operations with our own. Moreover, we may be unable to
realize the financial, operational, and other benefits we anticipate from these acquisitions or any other acquisition. Many potential acquisition targets do not meet our criteria, and for those that
do, we face significant competition for these acquisitions from our direct competitors, private equity funds, and other enterprises. Competition for future acquisition opportunities in our markets
could increase the price we pay for businesses we
acquire and could reduce the number of potential acquisition targets. Further, acquisitions may involve a number of special financial and business risks, such as:
-
- diversion of our management's time, attention, and resources;
-
- decreased utilization during the integration process;
-
- loss of key acquired personnel;
-
- increased costs to improve or coordinate managerial, operational, financial, and administrative systems including
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
-
- dilutive issuances of equity securities, including convertible debt securities;
-
- the assumption of legal liabilities;
-
- amortization of acquired intangible assets;
-
- potential write-offs related to the impairment of goodwill, including if our enterprise value declines below
certain levels;
-
- difficulties in integrating diverse corporate cultures; and
-
- additional conflicts of interests.
Our entry into new lines of business could adversely affect our results of operations
If we attempt to develop new practice areas or lines of business outside our core economic, financial, and management consulting
services, those efforts could harm our results of operations. Our efforts in new practice areas or new lines of business involve inherent risks, including risks associated
36
Table of Contents
with
inexperience and competition from mature participants in the markets we enter. Our inexperience in these new practice areas or lines of business may result in costly decisions that could harm our
business.
Fluctuations in the types of service contracts we enter into may adversely impact revenue and results of operations
We derive a portion of our revenues from fixed-price contracts. We derived 19.1% and 17.4% of our revenues from fixed-price engagements
in the twelve and twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010, respectively. We derived 11.9% and 10.9% of our revenues from fixed-price engagements in the twelve and
twenty-four weeks ended May 15, 2009, respectively. These contracts are more common in our management consulting area, and would likely grow in number with any expansion of that
area. Fluctuations in our mix between time-and-material or fixed-price contracts or arrangements with fees tied to performance-based criteria, may result in fluctuations of
revenue and results of operations. In addition, if we fail to estimate accurately the resources required for a fixed-price project or fail to satisfy our contractual obligations in a manner consistent
with the project budget, we might generate a smaller profit or incur a loss on the project. On occasion, we have had to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete projects, and we may have
to take similar action in the future, which could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
Our engagements may result in professional liability and we may be subject to other litigation, claims or assessments
Our services typically involve difficult analytical assignments and carry risks of professional and other liability. Many of our
engagements involve matters that could have a severe impact on the client's business, cause the client to lose significant amounts of money, or prevent the client from pursuing desirable business
opportunities. Accordingly, if a client is dissatisfied with our performance, the client could threaten or bring litigation in order to recover damages or to contest its obligation to pay our fees.
Litigation alleging that we performed negligently, disclosed client confidential information, or otherwise breached our obligations to the client could expose us to significant liabilities to our
clients and other third parties and tarnish our reputation.
Despite
our efforts to prevent litigation, from time to time we are party to various lawsuits, claims, or assessments in the ordinary course of business. Disputes may arise, for example,
from business acquisitions, employment issues, regulatory actions, and other business transactions. The costs and outcome of any lawsuits or claims could have a material adverse effect on us.
Potential conflicts of interests may preclude us from accepting some engagements
We provide our services primarily in connection with significant or complex transactions, disputes, or other matters that are usually
adversarial or that involve sensitive client information. Our engagement by a client may preclude us from accepting engagements with the client's competitors or adversaries because of conflicts
between their business interests or positions on disputed issues or other reasons. Accordingly, the nature of our business limits the number of both potential clients and potential engagements.
Moreover, in many industries in which we provide consulting services, such as in the telecommunications industry, there has been a continuing trend toward business consolidations and strategic
alliances. These consolidations and alliances reduce the number of potential clients for our services and increase the chances that we will be unable to continue some of our ongoing engagements or
accept new engagements as a result of conflicts of interests.
37
Table of Contents
Our clients may be unable or unwilling to pay us for our services
Our clients include some companies that may from time to time encounter financial difficulties, particularly during a downward trend in
the economy or may dispute the services we provide. If a client's financial difficulties become severe or a dispute arises, the client may be unwilling or unable to pay our invoices in the ordinary
course of business, which could adversely affect collections of both our accounts receivable and unbilled services. On occasion, some of our clients have entered bankruptcy, which has prevented us
from collecting amounts owed to us. The bankruptcy of a client with a substantial account receivable could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. A small
number of clients who have paid sizable invoices later declared bankruptcy, and a court determination that we were not properly entitled to that payment may require repayment of some or all of the
amount we received, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We may need to take material write-offs for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets if our market capitalization declines
As further described in Note 7 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are monitored annually for impairment, or more frequently, if there are indicators of impairment. In performing the first step of the goodwill impairment testing and measurement
process, we compare our entity-wide estimated fair value to net book value to identify potential impairment. We estimate the entity-wide fair value utilizing our market
capitalization, plus an appropriate control premium. We have utilized a control premium which considers appropriate industry, market and other pertinent factors, including indications of such premiums
from data on recent acquisition transactions. If we determine through the impairment evaluation process that goodwill has been impaired, we would record the impairment charge in our consolidated
statement of operations.
There
were no impairment losses related to goodwill or intangible assets during the twenty-four weeks ended May 14, 2010. Our entity-wide fair value
currently exceeds net book value, and therefore, there has not been an indication of impairment. However, at various points during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010, our stock price declined from previous
levels. We will continue to closely monitor our market capitalization and in the event that our average stock price subsequently declines and our market capitalization plus control premium declines
below net book value and remains below book value for a period we consider to be other-than-temporary, we will perform an evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill and other
intangibles.
Fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and results of operations could depress the market price of our common stock
We may experience significant fluctuations in our revenues and results of operations from one quarter to the next. If our revenues or
net income in a quarter fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock could fall significantly. Our results of operations in any quarter can
fluctuate for many reasons, including:
-
- our ability to implement rate increases;
-
- the number of weeks in our fiscal quarter;
-
- the number, scope, and timing of ongoing client engagements;
-
- the extent to which we can reassign our employee consultants efficiently from one engagement to the next;
38
Table of Contents
-
- the extent to which our employee consultants take holiday, vacation, and sick time, including traditional seasonality
related to summer vacation and winter holiday schedules;
-
- employee hiring;
-
- the extent of revenue realization or cost overruns;
-
- fluctuations in the results and continuity of the operations and management of our software subsidiary, NeuCo;
-
- fluctuations in our provision for income taxes due to changes in income arising in various tax jurisdictions, valuation
allowances, non-deductible expenses, and changes in estimates of our uncertain tax positions;
-
- fluctuations in interest rates;
-
- severe weather conditions and other factors affecting employee productivity; and
-
- collectibility of receivables and unbilled work in process.
Because
we generate the majority of our revenues from consulting services that we provide on an hourly fee basis, our revenues in any period are directly related to the number of our
employee consultants, their billing rates, and the number of billable hours they work in that period. We have a limited ability to increase any of these factors in the short term. Accordingly, if we
underutilize our consultants during one part of a fiscal period, we may be unable to compensate by augmenting revenues during another part of that period. In addition, we are occasionally unable to
utilize fully any additional consultants that we hire, particularly in the quarter in which we hire them. Moreover, a significant majority of our operating expenses, primarily office rent and
salaries, are fixed in the short term. As a result, if our revenues fail to meet our projections in any quarter, that could have a disproportionate adverse effect on our net income. For these reasons,
we believe our historical results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.
We could incur substantial costs protecting our proprietary rights from infringement or defending against a claim of infringement
As a professional services organization, we rely on non-competition and non-solicitation agreements with many
of our employees and non-employee experts to protect our proprietary rights. These agreements, however, may offer us only limited protection and may not be enforceable in every
jurisdiction. In addition, we may incur substantial costs trying to enforce these agreements.
Our
services may involve the development of custom business processes or solutions for specific clients. In some cases, the clients retain ownership or impose restrictions on our ability
to use the business processes or solutions developed from these projects. Issues relating to the ownership of business processes or solutions can be complicated, and disputes could arise that affect
our ability to resell or reuse business processes or solutions we develop for clients.
In
recent years, there has been significant litigation in the U.S. involving patents and other intellectual property rights. We could incur substantial costs in prosecuting or defending
any intellectual property litigation, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Despite
our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Litigation may be necessary in the
future to enforce our proprietary rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or
invalidity. Any such resulting litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Any failure
by us to protect our proprietary rights could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
39
Table of Contents
The market price of our common stock may be volatile
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated widely and may continue to do so. For example, from May 16, 2009, to
May 14, 2010, the trading price of our common stock ranged from a high of $31.47 per share to a low of $21.58 per share. Many factors could cause the market price of our common stock to rise
and fall. Some of these factors are:
-
- variations in our quarterly results of operations;
-
- the hiring or departure of key personnel or non-employee experts;
-
- changes in our professional reputation;
-
- the introduction of new services by us or our competitors;
-
- acquisitions or strategic alliances involving us or our competitors;
-
- changes in accounting principles or methods, such as Accounting Standards Codification 470-20, "Debt with
Conversion and Other Options," ("ASC Topic 470-20") (formerly FASB Staff Position Accounting Principles Board Opinion 14-1);
-
- changes in estimates of our performance or recommendations by securities analysts;
-
- future sales of shares of common stock in the public market; and
-
- market conditions in the industry and the economy as a whole.
In
addition, the stock market often experiences significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations are often unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.
These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. When the market price of a company's stock drops significantly, shareholders often institute securities class
action litigation against that company. Any litigation against us could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert the time and attention of our management and other resources, or otherwise harm our
business.
Our debt obligations may adversely impact our financial performance
In 2004, we issued a total of $90.0 million of 2.875% convertible senior subordinated debentures due 2034. We had previously
operated with little or no debt, and our previous
payments of interest had not been material. The interest we are required to pay on these debentures reduces our net income each year and will continue to do so until the debentures are no longer
outstanding. The terms of the debentures also include provisions that could accelerate our obligation to repay all amounts outstanding under the debentures if certain events happen, such as our
failure to pay interest in a timely manner, failure to pay principal upon redemption or repurchase, failure to deliver cash, shares of common stock, or other property upon conversion and other
specified events of default. In addition, on June 15, 2011, June 15, 2014, June 15, 2019, June 15, 2024 and June 15, 2029, or following specified fundamental
changes, holders of the debentures may require us to repurchase their debentures for cash. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we will reclassify the outstanding amount of debentures from a
non-current liability to a current liability. On December 14, 2004, we irrevocably elected to settle with cash 100% of the principal amount of the debentures upon conversion
thereof, and holders of the debentures may convert them if our stock price exceeds $50 per share for at least 20 out of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding
fiscal quarter. The market price conversion trigger was not met during the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Therefore, holders of the debentures are not able to exercise their right to convert the bonds
during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. This test is repeated each fiscal quarter. To date, no holders have exercised their right to convert the bonds. However, during fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009, and
fiscal 2008, we repurchased convertible debentures in the principal amount of $15.0 million, $17.3 million, and $10.2 million, respectively, on the open market.
40
Table of Contents
We
have a revolving line of credit for $60.0 million, to mitigate the potential liquidity risk, and to provide funding if required, in the event of conversion by the debenture
holders. We intend to use the amounts available under our bank revolving line of credit, current cash balances, and cash generated from operations in the event debenture holders exercise their rights
to convert. The amounts available under our bank revolving line of credit are constrained by various financial covenants and reduced by certain letters of credit outstanding. Our loan agreement will
mature on April 30, 2012. The degree to which we are leveraged could adversely affect our ability to obtain further financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make
us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures. Our ability to secure short-term and long-term debt or equity financing in the future, will depend on
several factors, including our future profitability, the levels of our debt and equity, restrictions under our existing revolving line of credit and the overall credit and equity market environments.
Insurance and claims expenses could significantly reduce our profitability
We are exposed to claims related to group health insurance. We self-insure a portion of the risk associated with these
claims. If the number or severity of claims increases, or we are required to accrue or pay additional amounts because the claims prove to be more severe than our original assessment, our operating
results would be adversely affected. Our future insurance and claims expense might exceed historical levels, which could reduce our earnings.
We expect to periodically assess our self-insurance strategy. We are required to periodically evaluate and adjust our claims reserves to reflect our experience. However, ultimate results
may differ from our estimates, which could result in losses over our reserved amounts. We maintain individual and aggregate medical plan stop loss insurance with licensed insurance carriers to limit
our ultimate risk exposure for any one case and for our total liability.
Many
businesses are experiencing the impact of increased medical costs as well as greater variability in ongoing costs. As a result, our insurance and claims expense could increase, or
we could raise our self-insured retention when our policies are renewed. If these expenses increase or we experience a claim for which coverage is not provided, results of our operations
and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Our reported earnings per share may be more volatile because of the accounting standards, rules, and regulations as they relate to our convertible senior subordinated
debentures
Holders of our 2.875% convertible senior subordinated debentures due 2034 may convert the debentures only under certain circumstances,
including certain stock price-related conversion contingencies. As further described in Note 9 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we determine the effect of the debentures on
earnings per share under the treasury stock method of accounting. The treasury stock method of accounting allows us to report dilution only when our average stock price per share for the reporting
period exceeds the $40 conversion price and only to the extent of the additional shares we may be required to issue in the event our conversion obligation exceeds the principal amount of the
debentures converted. Accordingly, volatility in our stock price could cause volatility in our reported diluted earnings per share.
The
FASB issued ASC Topic 470-20, which applies to any convertible debt instrument that may be settled in whole or in part with cash upon conversion, including our 2.875%
debentures. Under ASC Topic 470-20, we are required to recognize non-cash interest expense on our convertible senior subordinated debentures based on the market rate for
similar debt instruments without the conversion feature. Under ASC Topic 470-20, in fiscal 2010, we expect to record incremental non-cash interest expense of
approximately $1.2 million, including the impact of the repurchase completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
41
Table of Contents
Our charter and by-laws, Massachusetts law and the terms of our convertible debentures may deter takeovers
Our amended and restated articles of organization and amended and restated by-laws and Massachusetts law contain provisions
that could have anti-takeover effects and that could discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control or an acquisition that our shareholders and debenture holders may find attractive.
These provisions may also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for our shareholders to take some corporate actions, including the election of directors. In addition, the terms of our
convertible debentures provide that we may be required to pay a make-whole premium to the holders of our convertible debentures upon a change of control. These provisions could limit the
price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Not
applicable.
(b) Not
applicable.
(c) The
following table provides information about our repurchases of shares of our common stock during the twelve weeks ended May 14, 2010. During that period, we
did not act in concert with any affiliate or any other person to acquire any of our common stock and, accordingly, we do not believe that purchases by any such affiliate or other person (if any) are
reportable in the following table. For purposes of this table, we have divided the quarter into three equal periods of four weeks.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
(a)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased |
|
(b)
Average Price
Paid per Share |
|
(c)
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs(5) |
|
(d)
Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that May Yet
Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs(5) |
February 20, 2010 to March 19, 2010 |
|
2,970 shares(1) |
|
$27.21 per share(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
215,718 |
March 20, 2010 to April 16, 2010 |
|
9,290 shares(2) |
|
$23.32 per share(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
215,718 |
April 17, 2010 to May 14, 2010 |
|
6,339 shares(3) |
|
$23.78 per share(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$15,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
principal amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
convertible |
|
$1.00 per $1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debentures(4) |
|
principal amount(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
215,718 |
- (1)
- During
the four weeks ended March 19, 2010, we accepted 2,970 shares of our common stock as a tax withholding from certain of our employees, in
connection with the vesting of restricted shared that occurred during the indicated period, pursuant to the terms of our 2006 equity incentive plan, at an average share price of $27.21.
- (2)
- During
the four weeks ended April 16, 2010, we accepted 730 shares of our common stock as a tax withholding from certain of our employees, in
connection with the vesting of restricted shares that occurred during the indicated period, pursuant to the terms of our 2006 equity incentive plan, at an average share price of $24.23, and we
repurchased 8,560 shares of our common stock, based on the contractual right of first purchase contained in the applicable share agreements with us, at an average share price of $23.24 per share.
- (3)
- During
the four weeks ended May 14, 2010, we accepted 6,339 shares of our common stock as a tax withholding from certain of our employees, in
connection with the vesting of restricted shares that occurred during the indicated period, pursuant to the terms of our 2006 equity incentive plan, at an average share price of $23.78.
- (4)
- During
the four weeks ended May 14, 2010, we repurchased convertible debentures in the principal amount of $15.0 million, on the open market,
for $14.9 million. In addition, when the convertible debentures were repurchased, we paid accrued interest through the purchase date of approximately $0.1 million.
- (5)
- On
June 14, 2007, we issued a press release announcing that our board of directors has approved the repurchase from time to time of up to 1,500,000
shares of our common stock, of which 1,284,282 shares of common stock were purchased in prior quarters and no shares were purchased in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. As of May 14, 2010,
215,718 shares of our common stock remain available for repurchase under this plan.
42
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)
ITEM 5. Other Information
None.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
Item No. |
|
Description |
|
*10.1 |
|
Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Annex A of our definitive proxy statement filed on March 26, 2010). |
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of principal executive officer |
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of principal financial officer |
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 certification |
- *
- Management
contract or compensatory plan.
43
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
Date: June 21, 2010 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ PAUL A. MALEH
Paul A. Maleh President, Chief Executive Officer |
Date: June 21, 2010 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ WAYNE D. MACKIE
Wayne D. Mackie Executive Vice President, Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer |
44
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
Item No. |
|
Description |
|
*10.1 |
|
Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Annex A of our definitive proxy statement filed on March 26, 2010). |
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of principal executive officer |
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of principal financial officer |
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 certification |
- *
- Management
contract or compensatory plan.