CREATIVE REALITIES, INC. - Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-33169
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota | 41-1967918 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
5929 Baker Road, Suite 475, Minnetonka MN 55345
(Address of principal executive offices) ( Zip Code)
(952) 564-3500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock ($0.01 par value) | Nasdaq Capital Market | |
(Title of class) | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the issuer as of June 30,
2010, was approximately $18,806,801, based upon the last sale price of one share on such date.
As of March 22, 2011, the issuer had outstanding 19,233,187 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information required by Part III of this document is incorporated by reference to specified
portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to
be held June 9, 2011.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
15 | ||||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | ||||
27 | ||||
28 | ||||
29 | ||||
43 | ||||
43 | ||||
44 | ||||
44 | ||||
45 | ||||
45 | ||||
45 | ||||
45 | ||||
45 | ||||
45 | ||||
46 | ||||
46 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
F-1 | ||||
E-1 |
i
Table of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1 BUSINESS
Overview
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. (RNIN, we, our and us) is a Minnesota corporation
incorporated on March 23, 2000. We provide dynamic digital signage software and service solutions
targeting specific retail and service markets. Through a suite of software applications marketed as
RoninCast®, we provide an enterprise, web-based or hosted content delivery system that
manages, schedules and delivers digital content over wireless or wired networks. Additionally,
RoninCast® softwares flexibility allows us to develop custom solutions for specific customer
applications.
In August 2007, we acquired privately held McGill Digital Solutions, Inc. (now known as
Wireless Ronin Technologies (Canada), Inc. (RNIN Canada)). Based in Windsor, Ontario Canada,
RNIN Canada provides custom interactive software solutions, content engineering / creative
services, and is home to our automotive business development team. Through e-learning and
e-marketing RNIN Canada develops the competencies and knowledge of the people who most influence
product sales sales associates and their customers.
Business Strategy
Our objective is to be the premier provider of dynamic digital signage systems to customers in
our targeted retail and service markets. To achieve this objective, we intend to pursue the
following strategies:
Focus on Vertical Markets. Our direct sales force focuses primarily on the following vertical
market segments: (1) automotive, (2) food service, which includes quick serve restaurant (QSR),
fast casual and managed food services, and (3) branded retail. Within retail, we focus on branded
services with bricks and mortar locations, and consumer goods manufacturers, such as brands being
carried within a retail environment. To attract and influence customers, all three of these key
vertical markets continue to seek new mediums that provide greater flexibility and visual impact in
displaying content. We focus on markets in which we believe our solution offers the greatest
advantages in functionality, implementation and deployment over traditional media advertising.
Leverage Strategic Relationships. We seek to develop and leverage relationships with market
participants, such as hardware manufacturers, to integrate complementary technologies with our
solutions. We believe that such strategic relationships will enable access to emerging new
technologies and standards and increase our market presence. Our outreach also includes business
development strategic alliances with agencies, hardware, fixturing and signage companies,
architects and individuals who can generate additional interest and opportunity in our key vertical
markets.
Market and Brand Our Products and Services Effectively. Our key marketing objective is to
establish RoninCast® dynamic digital signage as an industry standard. Our marketing initiatives
convey the distinguishing and proprietary features of our products, including wireless networking,
centralized content management and custom software solutions.
Outsource Operating Functions. When appropriate we outsource certain support functions such
as system installation, fixturing, integration, software development and technical field support.
In addition, we purchase from manufacturers such items as stands, mounts, custom enclosures,
monitors and computer hardware. We believe that our experience in managing complex outsourcing
relationships improves the efficiency of our digital signage solutions and allows us to focus on
developing software solutions.
1
Table of Contents
We also participate in the International Retail Design Conference (IRDC), Fast Casual
Executive Summit, and Dine America. IRDC is the premier educational and networking event for the
store design and merchandising community, drawing speakers and attendees from throughout the U.S.
and abroad. Fast Casual Executive Summit is a gathering that brings together a select group of top
executives from the fast casual industry for networking, workgroup sessions and an exchange of
ideas and innovations on the industrys top strategic issues. Dine America is a food service
conference for industry executives to exchange ideas and participate in networking events and
educational sessions. In addition, we take advantage of speaking opportunities at GlobalShop and
publishing of a number of industry white papers to support our position in the digital signage
market/industry.
Create Custom Solutions. Although RoninCast® is an out-of-box solution, meaning it is
designed for an array of standard applications, we also develop custom systems that meet the
specific business needs of our customers. As digital signage technology continues to evolve, we
believe that creating custom solutions for our customers is one of the primary differentiators of
our value proposition.
Create Content Solutions. We continue to expand our strategic planning, creative design and
content engineering abilities. Our creative team develops strategies for both internal and
external initiatives. We continue to produce award-winning work both for our clients and for our
own use. In 2009, a majority of our marketing and sales materials were created in-house.
Develop New Products. Developing new products and technologies is critical to our success.
Increased acceptance of digital signage will require technological advancements to integrate it
with other systems such as inventory control, point-of sale and database applications. In addition,
digital media content is becoming richer and we expect customers will continue to demand more
advanced requirements for their digital signage networks. We intend to listen to our customers,
analyze the competitive landscape and continually improve our products.
Industry Background
Digital Signage.
Digital signage is a visually dynamic, targeted, flexible and affordable way for direct
marketing advertisers to reach consumers. At one point in time, place-based advertisers settled
for the shotgun blast marketing approach of sending out a general message to a large group of
people, in hopes that it would resonate with as many members of that group as possible. But that
was a hit-or-miss approach. Advertisers prefer to send customized messages tailored to the
specific needs, wants and desires of individual consumers in essence, reaching individuals
directly as opposed to reaching the masses indirectly.
So what is digital signage? The simplest example is a flat-panel screen, often evident in
retail stores, food services, casinos, banks/financial institutions, education and hospitality
environments that digitally feature a mix of promotions, advertisements and entertainment.
Growth of Digital Signage.
We believe there are four primary drivers to the growth of digital signage:
| Changes in the advertising landscape. Media expenditures since the 1950s have gone primarily to television, followed by newspapers, magazines and commercial radio. But this 50-year trend has now realized its apex, with generational declines in consumption among Gen X and Gen Y. A February 12, 2007 article in Media Week states that where we used to have only web-portals and sites, we now have Voice Over Internet Protocal (VOIP) telephony, digital signage and mobile media. The descending triangle of traditional media is being displaced by the ascending triangle of Internet-enabled media, composed of web-based media, e-mail, mobile media and digital-signage media. The Internet is now blending with out-of-home networked media to form this rapidly integrated media cluster, which is displacing the descending media triangle of television, print, and commercial radio. |
2
Table of Contents
| Growing awareness that digital signage is more effective. Research presented at the 2005 Digital Signage Business conference shows that digital signage receives up to 10 times the eye contact of static signage and, depending upon the market, may significantly increase sales for new products that are digitally advertised. A study by Arbitron, Inc. found that 29% of the consumers who have seen video in a store say they bought a product they were not planning on buying after seeing the product featured on the in-store video display. We believe that our dynamic digital signage solutions provide a valuable alternative to advertisers currently using static signage. | ||
| Decreasing hardware costs associated with digital signage. The high cost of monitors and media players has been an obstacle of digital signage implementation for a number of years. The price of digital display panels and media players has been falling due to increases in component supplies and manufacturing capacity. As a result, we believe that hardware costs are likely to continue to decrease, which would provide faster return on investment (ROI), resulting in continued growth in this market. | ||
| Compliance and effectiveness issues with traditional point-of-purchase signage. Our review of the current market indicates that most retailers go through a tedious process to produce traditional static point-of-purchase and in-store signage. They create artwork, send such artwork to a printing company, go through a proof and approval process and then ship the artwork to each store. According to a February 2006 article in The Retail Bulletin (February 19, 2006), it is estimated that less than 50% of all static in-store signage programs are completely implemented once they are delivered to stores. We believe our signage solution can enable prompt and effective implementation of retailer signage programs, thus significantly improving compliance and effectiveness. We believe calorie information compliance rules, as seen in New York and other states, along national legislation and pending rule making requiring certain restaurants with 20 or more locations to prominently display calorie information, represent additional opportunity within the digital signage industry. |
The RoninCast®X Solution
RoninCast®X solutions offer a digital alternative to static signage that provides our
customers with a dynamic visual marketing system designed to enhance the way they advertise,
market, deliver and update their messages to targeted audiences. Our technology can be combined
with interactive touch screens to create new platforms for assisting with product selection and
conveying marketing messages. For example, we designed Chryslers iShowroom which launched in the
fourth quarter of 2009 in both a desktop version and an interactive touch screen kiosk for auto
shoppers at Chrysler dealerships.
RoninCast®X software enables us to deliver a turn-key solution that includes project planning,
innovative design services, network deployment, software training, equipment, hardware
configuration, content engineering/development, implementation, maintenance, 24/7 help desk support
and a full-service network operations center, or NOC.
Our software manages, schedules, and delivers dynamic digital content over wired or wireless
networks. Our solution integrates proprietary software components and delivers content over
proprietary communication protocols.
RoninCast®X is an enterprise, web-based or hosted software solution which addresses changes in
advertising dynamics and other traditional methods of delivering content. We believe our product
provides benefits over traditional static signage and assists our customers in meeting their
objectives for a successful marketing campaign. RoninCast®X is our latest iteration of RoninCast® which was released in the fourth quarter of 2010.
RNIN offers a full service network operations center, manned 24/7, in Minnetonka, Minnesota,
supported by a redundant center. Our operators send schedules and content, gather data from the
field, flag and elevate field
3
Table of Contents
issues and handle customer calls. The servers in both locations communicate in real-time with
the devices deployed at our customer locations.
Features and benefits of the RoninCast® system include:
| Centrally Controlled or Various Levels of Network Access. RoninCast®X software empowers the end-user to distribute content from one central location or pre-assign various levels of password-protected access. As a result, real-time marketing decisions can be managed in-house by a single individual or by pre-designated content; ensuring retailers communication with customers is executed system-wide at the right time and the right place. Our content management software recognizes the receipt of new content, displays the content, and reports back to the central location(s) that the media player is working properly. | ||
| Secure Wireless or Wired Delivery. RoninCast®X software can distribute content within an installation that is wired (Ethernet connection) or wireless. RoninCast®X software is compatible with current wireless networking technology and does not require additional capacity within an existing network. RoninCast®X software uses Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) or wireless data connections to establish connectivity. By installing or using an existing onsite WLAN, the RoninCast®X digital signage solution can be incorporated throughout the venue without any environmental network cabling. We also offer our cellular communications solution for off-site signage where WLAN is not in use or practical. | ||
| Ease and Speed of Message Delivery. Changing market developments or events can be quickly incorporated into our system. The end-user may create entire content distributions on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Furthermore, the system allows the end-user to interject quick daily updates to feature new or overstocked items and then automatically return to the previous content schedule. | ||
| Content Playback and Reporting/Data Collection. RoninCast®X software provides users the ability to retrieve play logs from media players to review what has played for invoicing and advertising management. In addition, through interactive touch screen technology, RoninCast®X software can capture user data and information. This information can provide feedback to both the customer and the marketer. The ability to track customer interaction and data mine user profiles, in a non-obtrusive manner, can provide our customers feedback that would otherwise be difficult to gather. | ||
| Integrated Applications. RoninCast®X software can integrate digital signage with other applications and databases including point-of-sale. RoninCast®X software is able to use a database feed, RSS, Web Service feed to change the content or marketing message, making it possible for our customers to deliver targeted messages. Data feeds can be available either internally within a business or externally through the Internet. For example, our customers can specify variable criteria or conditions which RoninCast®X software will analyze, delivering marketing content relevant to the changing environment. This data can come from a myriad of sources, such as point-of-sale systems in a retail store or a slot-machine manager in a casino. | ||
| Scalability/Mobility. The RoninCast®X system provides the ability to easily move signage or scale-up to incorporate additional digital signage. Displays can be moved to or from any location under a wireless network. Customers are able to accommodate adds/moves/changes within their environment without rewiring network connections. When the customer wants to add additional digital signage, only electrical power needs to be supplied at the new location. | ||
| Compliance/Consistency. RoninCast®X software addresses compliance and consistency issues associated with print media and alternative forms of visual marketing. Compliance measures the frequency of having the marketing message synchronized primarily with product availability and price. Compliance issues cause inconsistencies in pricing, product image and availability, and store policies. RoninCast®X software addresses compliance by allowing message updates and flexible control of a single location or multiple locations network-wide. RoninCast®X software allows our customers to |
4
Table of Contents
display messages, pricing, images and other information on websites that are identical to those displayed at retail locations. | |||
| Network Control. Each remote media player is uniquely identified and distinguished from other units as well as between multiple locations. RoninCast®X software gives the end-user the ability to view the media players status to determine if the player is functioning properly and whether the correct content is playing. A list of all units on the system is displayed, allowing the end-user to view single units or clusters of units. The system also allows the end-user to receive information regarding the health of the network before issues occur. In addition, display monitors can be turned on or off remotely. |
Industry Recognition
In February 2010, we were awarded an Apex and Content award for various projects during the
Digital Signage Expo (DSE) & Interactive Technology Expo (ITE):
| Overall Network powered by our RoninCast® software in the Hospitality category; and | ||
| Innovative and Interactive for ARAMARKs ordering kiosk which allows their customers to Build Your Own Burger. |
DSE/ITE is a leading industry show dedicated to digital signage and interactive technology.
In July 2010, we were honored by QSR magazine with two bi-annual Applied Technology Awards.
Every two years, QSR magazine, a leading monthly food service publication, recognizes the best in
technology innovation that improves and enhances the restaurant experience for operators, staff and
customers.
Our Markets
We generate revenue through system sales, license fees and separate service fees for
consulting, hosting, training, content development and implementation services, and for ongoing
customer support and maintenance. We currently market and sell our software and service solutions
through our direct sales force. Select strategic partnerships and business alliances also drive
business to the company through a highly targeted business development initiative.
We market to companies that seek interactive touch screen solutions, service menu boards, and
non-touch digital signage. We target companies that deploy point-of-purchase advertising or visual
display systems and whose business model incorporates marketing, advertising, infotainment or
delivery of messages. Typical applications are retail and service business locations that depend on
traditional static point-of-purchase advertising. We believe that any retail businesses promoting a
brand or advertisers seeking to reach consumers at public venues are also potential customers. We
believe that our primary vertical market segments for digital signage include:
Automotive. RoninCast® for Automotive delivers relevant content to all areas of a dealership
and to special events like auto shows. It includes pre-built automotive design templates and
content along with our Automotive Content Management System and Dealer Ad Planner tools.
Interactive touch screens deliver detailed product information that informs and educates customers
and employees alike.
Food Service. QSR (Quick Serve Restaurant), Fast Casual, and Managed Food Services. The use
of menu boards and promotional boards both in-store and in the drive-through allow restaurants to
address the unique
5
Table of Contents
challenges of the industry, allowing for immediate compliance, the ability to quickly update
pricing, and highlight new items.
Branded Retail. Digital signage allows retailers to set promotions to fit various
demographics of customers and their respective shopping patterns and cycles, and to offer services
that more effectively compete with online retailers. Digital signage also effectively addresses
retailers challenge of point-of-purchase compliance.
Select Customers
Historically, our business has been dependent upon a few customers. Our goal is to broaden and
diversify our customer base. Our client base has grown organically and through our acquisition of
RNIN Canada from 99 clients at the end of 2007 to over 200 clients at the end of 2010. Detail on
key customers is as follows:
| Chrysler RNIN Canada has provided goods and services to Chrysler since 2001, including digital content creation services, e-learning tools and a data-driven touch screen kiosk program. The initial touch screen kiosk program used throughout Chryslers dealer network was called the Chrysler Vehicle Information Centre. Since 2009 we have been working with Chrysler on a next generation system called iShowroom. Chryslers U.S. dealerships can use the proprietary iShowroom product either in a personal computer only configuration, which is provided by Chrysler to each of its U.S. dealerships, or through a digital signage kiosk located on the showroom floor, which we jointly market with Chrysler to its dealers. Additionally, Chrysler launched Branded Tower Salons in 2010 promoting each of their four brands, Jeep, Ram, Chrysler and Dodge, through the iShowroom application to its dealership network. The dealerships are incentivized to adopt the Branded Tower Salons as part of Chryslers Dealer Standards Program, which determines the amount of quarterly marketing dollars provided by Chrysler to its dealerships. As of December 31, 2010, we had received purchase orders for 200 dealers from Chrysler for the Branded Tower Salons. We also continue to provide additional content development services to Chrysler that feature Chrysler products as they are displayed on iShowroom digital signage systems. Sales to Chrysler, including sales to its former advertising agency BBDO Detroit/Windsor, represented 46.7% and 14.3% of total sales in 2010 and 2009, respectively. | ||
| ARAMARK We have provided goods and services to ARAMARK for its operations in the food service industry since April 2008. ARAMARK provides managed food service to colleges, universities, healthcare institutions, sports and entertainment venues, conference centers and other private and public gathering places. While ARAMARK is not our only customer in the food industry, it is our only customer that provides managed food service. We have received purchase orders from ARAMARKs Higher Education division to support menu boards and touch screens on university campuses, including its Burger Studio and Topio brands. Additionally, ARAMARK has placed orders for our product services at elementary and secondary schools. Sales to ARAMARK represented 13.9% and 21.7% of our total sales in 2010 and 2009, respectively. | ||
| Thomson Reuters We have provided goods and services to Thomson Reuters in connection with Thomson Reuters InfoPoint digital signage system since June 2007. The InfoPoint digital signage system is a lifestyle, news, information and pictures-based digital signage display network designed for the out-of-home market. We continued to expand the number of InfoPoint digital signage locations pursuant to additional purchase orders received in 2010. Additionally, we received an order to deploy InfoPoint at 50 sites for a financial services institution with over 3,000 locations. During 2010 Thomson Reuters launched a new interactive application, Reuters Insider, which is also fully supported by our RoninCast® software. As of December 31, 2010, we provided 24-hour per day hosting and support services to over 350 locations for Thomson Reuters. Sales to Thomson Reuters represented 11.9% and 15.8% of total sales in 2010 and 2009, respectively. | ||
| YUM!/KFC Since December 2007, we have provided goods and services to KFC, an entity operating in the quick service restaurant QSR industry. We have provided goods and services in connection with KFCs implementation of digital menu boards in restaurants in seven metropolitan areas selected by KFC. Those digital menu boards have been installed in both KFC-owned and franchise restaurant |
6
Table of Contents
locations. We continued to expand our relationship with KFC and its parent, YUM Restaurants Services Group, Inc. (YUM!), in 2010, which included deploying 10 KFC/TacoBell combo stores. The total number of stores being monitored by our NOC as of the end of 2010 was over 200 locations across five countries. KFC restaurants in Las Vegas, Austin, Oklahoma City, Orlando, Jacksonville and Louisville are now 100% digital. We also deployed a custom content management web-portal for KFC corporate and its franchisee operators, which allows for the online management of content, day-parting and monthly scheduling of the digital menu boards. Sales to YUM!/KFC represented 6.6% of total sales in 2010. Sales to KFC represented 10.1% of total sales in 2009. |
NEC Reseller Agreement
In 2009, we entered into an agreement with NEC Display Solutions of America, or NEC, pursuant
to which NEC became an authorized reseller of RoninCast® software. NEC is currently marketing the
fully-customized, hosted content management solution to its end-users. We believe this agreement
allows NEC to address specific needs of current and future digital signage customers. RoninCast®
enables NEC to offer a solution for large digital signage networks that require a robust customized
solution. We believe this agreement will also expand our sales reach by extending RoninCast®
software into the hands of NECs sales personnel across the U.S. and Canada.
Product Description
RoninCast®X is a dynamic digital signage solution that combines scalable, secure, enterprise
compliant, proprietary software with off the shelf or customer owned hardware. This integrated
solution creates a network capable of controlling, managing, scheduling and delivering content from
a single location to an enterprise-level system.
RoninCast®X software is built in two main software suites, the Server Software Suite and the
Client Software Suite.
RoninCast®X Server Software Suite
The RoninCast®X Server Software Suite is a secure web-based, distributed server which provides
control over the network. The Server Software Suite includes the following components:
Web-Based Management System (WBMS) the WBMS suite is the central hub of RoninCast®X, it
provides the digital signage operators with a single point for controlling the entire digital
signage network through an Internet browser over an SSL secured connection.
The WBMS provides access to the standard RoninCast®X functions as well as client customized
features such as content management systems (CMS) and custom reporting. RoninCast implements user
access through a role based concept. Each user has, upon login, all the features in which they
have access rights to control their own networks. WBMS hosted functions are:
7
Table of Contents
| Network Manager this allows digital signage operators to manage their network of screens and organize them in groups to simplify control, updates, monitoring and reporting. Network groups can follow any business concept whether it is location based, time zone based, location type or any other concept. Virtual grouping allows the operators to create as many groups as needed to target the entire network, a group of screens or down to individual screens. | ||
| Content Scheduler the content scheduler provides a timeline view for each content zone with flexible view options. Operators can view schedules over a years length of time or down to seconds. The content scheduler offers system users a powerful yet simple interface to perform complex scheduling tasks such as content playback repeats or recurrence (daily, weekly and monthly) over different types of content. It also allows operators to create and maintain content playlists and target a specific zone or multiple zones. | ||
| Content Management System (CMS) the CMS is one of the customizable WBMS components. Using the CMS, operators have the ability to manage their content such as items and prices on menu boards, specials, promotions and other updatable content. | ||
| Network Monitoring RoninCast®X offers digital signage operators three main network monitoring functions within the WBMS. Other monitoring and alert notification functions are available through different means such as email, reports and NOC functions. | ||
| Reporting reporting includes both standard system reports and client customized reports. Standard system reports provide an overview of system operations while customized reports are client-specific. |
Distribution Server the distribution server is a scalable robust server which provides
content delivery to all screens. Utilizing a secure connection, it delivers schedules, data
and content to subscribed screens.
Data Processing Server players across the network upload different types of data to the
server. Such data includes device health data, proof of plays and log data. The data
processing server acts on all these data sources and processes them in an optimized database
for further processing into reports, raw data feeds and decision analytics.
Software Update Server the software update server ensures that all devices in the network
are up-to-date. Once software updates are available, the software update server delivers
these updates to all subscribed devices. All out-of-date disconnected devices are brought
up-to-date once connected.
Integration Services Integration services provides external systems with a secured
application programming interface (API) for the RoninCast®X Server Suite through secured web
services. External systems can access all RoninCast®X features through the Integration
Services API. Such features include network management, content scheduling, content
management, data request and reporting.
RoninCast®X Client Software Suite
The RoninCast®X client software suite bundles all the software components required to
operate the device players (PCs). This software suite communicates with the server suite
over SSL secured HTTP port 80. The client suite main components are:
Media Player media player enables the playback of a wide range of content formats from
Flash, movies, and images to TV tuners and MS Power Point.
Macromedia Flash is a multimedia platform used to add animation, video, and interactivity
to web pages.
8
Table of Contents
Catalog Manager the catalog manager manages content libraries on player devices. It uses
the device schedule to determine expired assets and perform content clean up to ensure
proper disk space usage.
Data Integration Layer (DIL) the DIL allows the player to leverage external data sources
for different services. External data sources can be used to drive content, schedules and
other functions as needed. As an example, electronic menu board content can be driven by a
point-of-sale (POS) data source and/or inventory data source.
Device Health, Diagnosis and Repair Modules these modules monitor both the player hardware
and software. Monitoring data is uploaded to the server for reporting purposes and used to
diagnose and repair common failures. These modules ensure proper player performance and
higher player availability.
Software and Content Updates Modules these modules ensure that the client software suite
is always up-to-date. They also ensure timely delivery of content and schedule updates over
a secured connection.
External Player Services a secured set of services allows external systems to interact
with the player and perform certain actions. Such actions include displaying certain content
based on an externally triggered event.
Key Components
Key components of our solution include:
User-Friendly Network Control
When managing the RoninCast®X network, the ability to easily and intuitively control the
network is critical to the success of the system and the success of the customer. Customer
input has been, and continues to be, invaluable in the design of the RoninCast®X WBMS.
Everything from simple design decisions, such as menu layout, to advanced network
communication, such as seeing the content play on a remote screen, is designed to be
user-friendly and intuitive.
Diverse Media and Authoring Choices
With the myriad of media design tools available today, it is vital that RoninCast®X software
stay current with the tools and technologies available. RoninCast®X software started with
Macromedia Flash, and while Flash remains a large percentage of content created and
deployed, we have continued to innovate and expand the content options available. Today we
offer video (MPEG1, MPEG2, MPEG4, WMV, AVI, QT, MOV), Macromedia Flash (SWF), still images
(JPEG, BMP), and audio (MP3, WAV). Additionally, raw data feeds (from internal or Internet
sources) can be processed and displayed as tickers that can be integrated into any screen
layout. As media technologies continue to emerge and advance, we plan to expand the media
choices for RoninCast®X solutions.
Intelligent Content Distribution
The size and complexity of the content being sent to digital displays are growing. In order
for RoninCast®X software to maintain network friendliness across wired and wireless
connections, it is important that as few bytes as possible are sent. There are several ways
that we enable this.
The system utilizes a locally installed librarian that takes advantage of unused space on
the hard-drive to track and manage content. Only files that are needed at the player are
transferred, saving on network bandwidth.
9
Table of Contents
RoninCast®X software supports content transfer technologies other than one-to-one
connections. One such technology is multicast satellite distribution. This technology is
widely used in corporations such as big-box retailers that distribute large quantities of
data to many locations.
Often it is not the content itself that needs to be changed, but the information within the
content that needs to be changed. If information updates are needed, instead of creating and
sending a new content file, RoninCast®X software can facilitate the information swap.
Through Macromedia Flash and the data integration library, changing content information
(instead of the content itself) can be facilitated through mechanisms such as RSS feeds, POS
systems, etc. This reduces updates from mega-bytes to the few bytes required to display a
new piece of data (such as a price).
Distributed Management
In order for RoninCast®X solutions to be scalable to large organizations, it is necessary
that each individual installation not burden the server with everyday tasks that are
required to manage a complex network. To this end, the master controller offloads much of
its work and monitoring to the site server. On the local network, the site monitor monitors
players, distributes content, and collects data. The only task that is required of the
server is to monitor and communicate with the site server. In this way, expansion of the
RoninCast®X network by adding an installation does not burden the master controller by the
number of screens added, but only by the single installation.
Enterprise-Level Compatibility
RoninCast®X software is designed to easily integrate into large enterprises and become part
of the suite of tools that are used every day. The RoninCast®X WBMS runs under Windows (2K,
XP and 2K+ Server). In order to accommodate our customers network administrators, our
software supports the ability to use web services to create controlled, closed-loop
interfaces for the RoninCast®X system.
Flexible Network Design
One of the strengths of the RoninCast®X network is the ease and flexibility of
implementation and expansion. RoninCast®X software is designed to intelligently and
successfully manage myriad connection options simultaneously, both internally to an
installation and externally to the Internet.
RoninCast®X solutions can be networked using wired LAN and/or wireless LAN technology. With
wireless LAN, time and costs associated with installing or extending a hardwired network are
eliminated. Wireless LAN offers customers freedom of installations and reconfigurations
without the high costs of cabling. Additionally, a new installation can be connected to the
Internet through dial-up/DSL telephone modems, wireless data communications or
high-throughput enterprise data-pipes.
In order to communicate with the WBMS, a new installation can be connected to the Internet
through dial-up/DSL telephone modems, digital mobile communication (such as CDMA or GPRS),
or high-throughput enterprise data-pipes.
Security
Essential to the design of RoninCast®X software is the security of the network and hence the
security of our customers. In order to provide the most secure installation possible, we
address security at every level of the system: RoninCast®X communication, operating system
hardening, network security and user interaction.
RoninCast®X software utilizes standard HTTP or HTTPS to communicate with members of the
system. Using HTTPS, RoninCast®X is able to deliver content securely.
10
Table of Contents
In order for computers to be approved for use on the RoninCast®X network, their operating
systems go through a rigorous hardening process. This hardening removes or disables
extraneous programs that are not required for the core operation of RoninCast®X
applications. The result is a significantly more stable and secure base for the system as a
whole.
Wireless and wired LAN each pose different levels of security exposure. Wireless LAN has the
most exposure to potential intruders. However, both can be accessed. In order to create a
secure network, we utilize high-level industry-standard wireless LAN equipment and configure
it with the highest level of security. When necessary, we work with our customers, analyze
their network security and recommend back-end computer security hardware and software that
will help make both their network and the RoninCast®X network as secure as possible.
RoninCast®X also uses a username/password mechanism with one-way encryption to protect the
system. RoninCast®X also utilizes an access control layer that allows the administrator to
give access or limit access to every part of the system all the way down to the object
level.
Our Suppliers
Our principal suppliers include the following:
| NEC Display Solutions, Viewsonic and LG for monitors; |
| ASI and Seneca Data for computers; |
| Chief Manufacturing, Inc. and Peerless for fixtures; and |
| Rollouts, PRS, Spencer Technologies and Field Solutions for installation services. |
We have no long-term agreements with any of our suppliers.
Ongoing Development
Ongoing product development is essential to our ability to stay competitive in the marketplace
as a solution provider. We believe that the functionality and capabilities of our product
offerings are competitive advantages and that we must continue to invest in them to maintain our
competitive position. The digital signage market is subject to rapid technological change,
including new communication technologies, new computer hardware and display technologies, as well
as the expansion of media display options. Client requirements are also evolving rapidly. To
remain successful, we must continually adapt to these and other changes. We incurred research and
development expenses of $2.9 million in 2010, $2.2 million in 2009, and $2.5 million in 2008.
Services
Our services are integral to our ability to provide customers with successful digital signage
solutions. We offer a wide range of services from consulting, project planning, design, content
development, training, hosting and implementation services, to ongoing customer support and
maintenance. Generally, we charge our customers for services on a fee-for-service basis.
We also offer existing and prospective clients robust and turn-key content creation
capabilities. Our graphic shops in Windsor, Ontario, Canada and Minnetonka, Minnesota are staffed
with competent and experienced artists who excel at converting existing assets into appealing
digital assets.
Consulting: We work with clients to determine the ultimate hardware and software solution tailored
to the specific requirements for their environment.
11
Table of Contents
Creative: With design experience and an outstanding record of customer satisfaction, our creative
team helps make our clients marketing and advertising initiatives a reality.
Content Engineering: Our content engineering group is tasked with the architecture, production and
development of advanced interactive content as well as all e-learning content creation producing
relevant, valuable, and measurable results that engage and motivate customers and consumers alike.
Content Deployment: Our content deployment group offers robust content creation and deployment
capabilities for non-interactive applications, which includes planning, re-purposing of existing
content and the development of visual communications.
Project Management: Our project management team has experience with large-scale implementations and
installations keeping the goals of timeliness, effectiveness and customer satisfaction in mind.
Fixturing: Whether our clients have their own partners or need our assistance, we work with clients
to incorporate the RoninCast®X technology into their environments.
Installation: Our third-party installers have the experience to roll out large-scale projects and
single location installations without unexpected delays or expenses.
Training: We provide training with every purchase of RoninCast®X software.
Hosting: For clients requiring assistance with operating their networks, we offer the service of a
NOC for any network hosting needs.
Maintenance and Support: Our support staff is available 24/7 for assistance with any issue.
Standard maintenance, including software upgrades, is included under the annual maintenance
agreement.
Intellectual Property
Patents: As of March 22, 2011, we had received one design patent, filed three
U.S. patent applications and had one Canadian patent application pending relating to various
aspects of our RoninCast® delivery system. Highly technical patents can take up to six years to
issue and we cannot assure you that any patents will be issued, or if issued, that the same will
provide significant protection to us. We may abandon patent applications if we determine that the
patent is unlikely to be granted, it is unlikely to provide significant protection or it is
impractical to continue the application process after correspondence with the appropriate patent
office or examiner.
Trademarks: As of March 22, 2011, we had the following trademark registrations:
U.S. federal trademark registrations for:
| WIRELESS RONIN® | ||
| RONIN CAST® | ||
| RONINCAST and Design® | ||
| WR and Design® | ||
| RONINCAST® and Design (Color Logo) | ||
| WR (Circle Design)® | ||
| COMMUNICATING AT LIFE SPEED® |
12
Table of Contents
Canadian trademark registrations for:
| RONIN CAST and Design® | ||
| RONINCAST® and Design (Color Logo) | ||
| WR (Circle Design)® | ||
| COMMUNICATING AT LIFE SPEED® |
European Union trademark registrations for:
| RONIN CAST® | ||
| RONIN CAST and Design® | ||
| RONINCAST® Design (Color Logo) | ||
| COMMUNICATING AT LIFESPEED. |
Federal trademark registrations continue indefinitely so long as the trademarks are in use and
periodic renewals and other required filings are made. We review our trademarks and registration
requirements with the help of trademark legal counsel and may, from time to time, abandon
registered trademarks or file new applications for trademarks if then-current registrations no
longer accurately reflect our use of those trademarks.
Competition
We compete with EnQii and Stratacache as digital signage providers. Within our primary
verticals of automotive, food service and retail, our competitors include Broadsign, Scala,
Omnivex, Hughes, Texas Digital, c-nario, Harris-Infocaster, Planar/Coolsign and Cisco Systems.
Touch-screen competitors include Netkey (acquired by NCR in 2009) and Nanonation. Some or all of
our competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we
do and may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or changes
in customer requirements. We believe that our direct sales force, our full service network
operations center, our complete digital signage solutions and our brand awareness are the primary
factors affecting our competitive position. We also compete with standard advertising media,
including print, television and billboards.
Territories
Our company sells products and services primarily throughout North America. In the year ended
December 31, 2010, we derived 95% of net sales in the U.S., 2% of net sales in Canada and 3% in
other countries, based on the location of the end customer. For more information, see Note 9 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements (Segment Information and Major Customers).
Regulation
We are subject to regulation by various federal and state governmental agencies. Such
regulation includes radio frequency emission regulatory activities of the U.S. Federal
Communications Commission, the consumer protection laws of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission,
product safety regulatory activities of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, and
environmental regulation in areas in which we conduct business. Some of the hardware components
which we supply to customers may contain hazardous or regulated substances, such as lead. A number
of U.S. states have adopted or are considering takeback bills which address the disposal of
electronic waste, including CRT style and flat panel monitors and computers. Electronic waste
legislation is developing. Some of the bills passed or under consideration may impose on us, or on
our customers or suppliers, requirements for disposal of systems we sell and the payment of
additional fees to pay costs of disposal and recycling. As of March 22, 2011, we have not
determined that such legislation or proposed legislation will have a material adverse impact on our
business.
13
Table of Contents
Employees
We often refer to our employees as associates. As of March 22, 2011, we had a full-time
workforce of 81, of which 66 were employees (associates) and 15 were full-time contractors.
Fifty-two members of our workforce operate out of our headquarters located in Minnetonka,
Minnesota. The others operate out of our office located in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Our
workforce is engaged in programming, networking, designing, training, sales/marketing and
administration.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table provides information with respect to our executive officers as of March
22, 2011. Each executive officer has been appointed to serve until his or her successor is duly
appointed by the Board of Directors or his or her earlier removal or resignation from office.
There are no familial relationships between any director or executive officer.
Name | Age | Position with Company | ||||
Scott W. Koller
|
49 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Darin P. McAreavey
|
42 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Scott W. Koller became our President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2011. Mr. Koller
served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from May 2010 to December 2010 and as our
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2009 until May 2010. Mr. Koller
joined our company in November 2004. He served as our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing
from November 2004 through January 2007, our Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing from
February 2007 through October 2008, and our Executive Vice President of Sales and Project
Management from October 2008 through March 2009. From December 2003 to November 2004, Mr. Koller
served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Rollouts Incorporated, a provider of field
services for large-scale implementations. From August 1998 to November 2003, Mr. Koller served in
various roles with Walchem Corporation, a manufacturer of metering pumps and analytical
controllers, including the last three years as Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Koller
served in the U.S. Naval Nuclear Power Program from 1985 to 1992.
Darin P. McAreavey became our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January
2011. Mr. McAreavey served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2009 to
December 2010. Mr. McAreavey worked for Xiotech Corporation, a computer storage company, from
September 2007 to March 2009 as its Chief Financial Officer. From February 2007 to September 2007,
Mr. McAreavey worked for Global Capacity Group, a telecom logistics provider, as its Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. McAreavey was the Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and
Treasurer for Stellent, Inc., a content management software company, from May 2006 to February 2007
and that companys Corporate Controller from September 2004 to May 2006. Mr. McAreavey worked at
Computer Network Technology, a provider of storage networking solutions, from August 1995 to
September 2004 where he held several management-level finance positions including Director of
Finance. From November 1993 to August 1995, Mr. McAreavey was a Supervising Senior for KPMG LLP.
Mr. McAreavey began his professional career as a Staff Accountant at Eide Helmeke & Co., where he
served from July 1991 to November 1993.
14
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS
The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, financial condition,
operating results and cash flows. These risk factors should be considered in connection with
evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because
these risk factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any
forward-looking statement. The risks we have highlighted below are not the only ones we face. If
any of these events actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results or cash
flow could be negatively affected. We caution you to keep in mind these risk factors and to
refrain from attributing undue certainty to any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this report.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our operations and business are subject to the risks of an early stage company with limited
revenue and a history of losses, operating in a developing industry We have incurred losses since
inception, and we have had only limited revenue. We may not ever become or remain profitable.
Since inception, we have had limited revenue from the sale of our products and services, and
we have incurred net losses. We incurred net losses of $7.9 million and $10.2 million for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, we had an accumulated
deficit of $82.3 million.
We have not been profitable in any year of our operating history and anticipate incurring
additional losses into the foreseeable future. We do not know whether or when we will become
profitable. Even if we are able to achieve profitability in future periods, we may not be able to
sustain or increase our profitability in successive periods. We may require additional financing in
the future to support our operations. For further information, please review the risk factor
Adequate funds for our operations may not be available, requiring us to curtail our activities
significantly.
We have formulated our business plans and strategies based on certain assumptions regarding
the acceptance of our business model and the marketing of our products and services. However, our
assessments regarding market size, market share, market acceptance of our products and services and
a variety of other factors may prove incorrect. Our future success will depend upon many factors,
including factors which may be beyond our control or which cannot be predicted at this time.
Our success depends on our RoninCast software and services achieving and maintaining
widespread acceptance in our targeted markets. If our products contain errors or defects, our
business reputation may be harmed.
Our success will depend to a large extent on broad market acceptance of RoninCast® software
and our other products and services among our prospective customers. Our prospective customers may
still not use our solutions for a number of other reasons, including preference for static signage,
lack of familiarity with our technology, preference for competing technologies or perceived lack of
reliability. We believe that the acceptance of RoninCast® software and our other products and
services by our prospective customers will depend on the following factors:
| our ability to demonstrate RoninCast® softwares economic and other benefits; | ||
| our customers becoming comfortable with using RoninCast® software; and | ||
| the reliability of the RoninCast® software and the hardware comprising our digital signage systems. |
Our software is complex and must meet stringent user requirements. Our products could contain
errors or defects, especially when first introduced or when new models or versions are released,
which could cause our customers to reject our products, result in increased service costs and
warranty expenses and harm our reputation. Unanticipated warranty and other costs for defective products could adversely affect our business. We must
develop our products
15
Table of Contents
quickly to keep pace with the rapidly changing digital signage and
communications market. In the future, we may experience delays in releasing new products as
problems are corrected. In addition, some undetected errors or defects may only become apparent as
new functions are added to our products. The need to repair or replace products with design or
manufacturing defects could temporarily delay the sale of new products and adversely affect our
reputation. Delays, costs and damage to our reputation due to product defects could harm our
business.
Difficult and volatile conditions in the capital, credit and commodities markets and general
economic uncertainty have prompted companies to cut capital spending worldwide and could continue
to materially adversely affect our business.
Disruptions in the economy and constraints in the capital, credit and commodities markets have
caused companies to reduce or delay capital investment. Some of our prospective customers may
cancel or delay spending on the development or roll-out of capital and technology projects with us
due to continuing economic uncertainty. Our financial position, results of operations and cash
flow could continue to be materially adversely affected by continuing difficult economic conditions
and significant volatility in the capital, credit and commodities markets and in the overall
worldwide economy. The continuing impact that these factors might have on us and our business is
uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. Such economic conditions have accentuated each of
the risks we face and magnified their potential effect on us and our business. The difficult
conditions in these markets and the overall economy affect our business in a number of ways. For
example:
Although we believe we have sufficient liquidity under our credit agreement with Silicon
Valley Bank to run our business, under extreme market conditions, we cannot assure you that
such funds would be available or sufficient and, in such a case, we may not be able to
successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all.
Market volatility has exerted downward pressure on our stock price, which may make it more
difficult for us to raise additional capital in the future.
Economic conditions could continue to result in our customers experiencing financial
difficulties or electing to limit spending because of the declining economy, which may
result in decreased revenue for us. Difficult economic conditions have adversely affected
certain industries in particular, including the automotive and restaurant industries, in
which we have major customers. We could also experience lower than anticipated order levels
from current customers, cancellations of existing but unfulfilled orders, and extended
payment or delivery terms.
Economic conditions could materially impact us through insolvency of our suppliers or
current customers.
Economic conditions combined with the weakness in the credit markets could continue to
lead to increased price competition for our products, increased risk of excess and obsolete
inventories and higher overhead costs as a percentage of revenue.
If the markets in which we participate experience further economic downturns or slow recovery,
this could continue to negatively impact our sales and revenue generation, margins and operating
expenses, and consequently have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. While we have down-sized our operations to reflect decreased demand, we may
not be successful in mirroring current demand. If customer demand were to decline further, we
might be unable to adjust expense levels rapidly enough in response to falling demand or without
changing the way in which we operate. If revenue were to decrease further and we were unable to
adequately reduce expense levels, we might incur significant losses that could adversely affect our
overall financial performance and the market price of our common stock.
Because we do not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers, the failure to
obtain anticipated orders or the deferral or cancellation of commitments could have adverse effects
on our business.
16
Table of Contents
Our business is characterized by short-term purchase orders and contracts which do not require
that purchases be made. This makes forecasting our sales difficult. The failure to obtain
anticipated orders and deferrals or cancellations of purchase commitments because of changes in
customer requirements, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. We have experienced such challenges in the past and
may experience such challenges in the future.
Most of our contracts are terminable by our customers with limited notice and without penalty
payments, and early terminations could have a material effect on our business, operating results
and financial condition.
Most of our contracts are terminable by our customers following limited notice and without
early termination payments or liquidated damages due from them. In addition, each stage of a
project often represents a separate contractual commitment, at the end of which the customers may
elect to delay or not to proceed to the next stage of the project. We cannot assure you that one or
more of our customers will not terminate a material contract or materially reduce the scope of a
large project. The delay, cancellation or significant reduction in the scope of a large project or
a number of projects could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.
We may experience variability in our total sales on a quarterly basis as a result of many
factors, including the condition of the electronic communication and digital signage industry in
general, shifts in demand for software and hardware products, technological changes and industry
announcements of new products and upgrades, absence of long-term commitments from customers, timing
and variable lead-times of customer orders, delays in or cancellations of customer orders,
variations in component costs and/or adverse changes in the supply of components, variations in
operating expenses, changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors, the ability of our
customers to pay for products and services, effectiveness in managing our operations and changes in
economic conditions in general. We may not consider it prudent to adjust our spending levels on the
same timeframe; therefore, if total sales decline for a given quarter, our operating results may be
materially adversely affected. As a result of the potential fluctuations in our quarterly operating
results, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results should not be relied
upon as an indication of future performance. Further, it is possible that in future quarters our
operating results will be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In such
event, the price of our common stock would likely be materially adversely affected.
Due to our dependence on a limited number of customers, we are subject to a concentration of
credit risk.
In the case of insolvency by one of our significant customers, an account receivable with
respect to that customer might not be collectible, might not be fully collectible, or might be
collectible over longer than normal terms, each of which could adversely affect our financial
position. As of December 31, 2010, Chrysler LLC accounted for 48% of our total receivables. In
April 2009, Chrysler and twenty-four of its affiliated subsidiaries filed a consolidated petition
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection with the U.S. Federal Bankruptcy court in New York City.
While Chrysler has emerged from bankruptcy and we continue to receive orders, our revenues were
significantly impacted in 2009 compared to the prior year (see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements regarding Segment Information and Major Customers.) In addition, Chryslers advertising
agency, BBDO Detroit, closed its office at the end of January 2010. Chrysler has subsequently
moved its advertising relationship to another firm, which is not currently a customer of ours.
During 2010, we received all purchase orders directly from Chrysler, which included orders that
traditionally would have been issued through BBDO Detroit/Windsor, the advertising agency
responsible for purchasing our products and services on Chryslers behalf prior to 2010. Although
we believe Chryslers decision to change its advertising agency did not affect any of our current
projects, we are unable to provide assurance that future opportunities will not be impacted.
In the case of insolvency by one of our significant customers, an account receivable with
respect to that customer might not be collectible, might not be fully collectible, or might be
collectible over longer than normal terms, each of which could adversely affect our financial
position. In one case in the past, we converted a customers account receivable into a secured
note receivable then into the underlying collateral, which we ultimately wrote off. In the future, if we convert other accounts receivable into notes receivable or
obtain the collateral
17
Table of Contents
underlying notes receivable, we may not be able to fully recover the amount
due, which could adversely affect our financial position. Furthermore, the value of the collateral
which serves to secure any such obligation is likely to deteriorate over time due to obsolescence
caused by new product introductions and due to wear and tear suffered by those portions of the
collateral installed and in use. There can be no assurance that we will not suffer credit losses in
the future.
The integration and operation of an acquired business may disrupt our business and create
additional expenses and we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. In the
event we elect to expand our business through acquisitions, we cannot assure that such future
acquisitions, if pursued and consummated, will be advantageous or profitable.
Integration of an acquisition involves numerous risks, including difficulties in converting
information technology systems and assimilating the operations and products or services of an
acquired business, the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns, risks of
entering markets in which we have limited or no direct prior experience, assumption of unknown
liabilities, increased accounting and financial reporting risk, the potential loss of key
associates and/or customers, difficulties in completing strategic initiatives already underway in
the acquired or acquiring companies, unfamiliarity with partners of the acquired company, and
difficulties in attracting additional key employees necessary to manage acquired operations, each
of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
In addition, we may determine to grow through future acquisitions of technologies, products or
businesses. We may complete future acquisitions using cash, or through issuances of equity
securities which could be dilutive, or through the incurrence of debt which would likely contain
restrictive covenants. Finally, acquisitions may result in significant amortization expense related
to intangible assets. Such methods of financing could adversely affect our financial condition. We
cannot assure you that we will be successful in integrating any business acquired in the future. In
addition, we cannot assure you that we will pursue or consummate future acquisitions or that any
acquisitions, if consummated, will be advantageous or profitable for our company.
Our prospective customers often take a long time to evaluate our products, with this lengthy
and variable sales cycle making it difficult to predict our operating results.
It is difficult for us to forecast the timing and recognition of revenue from sales of our
products because our prospective customers often take significant time to evaluate our products
before purchasing them. The period between initial customer contact and a purchase by a customer
may be more than one year. During the evaluation period, prospective customers may decide not to
purchase or may scale down proposed orders of our products for various reasons, including:
| reduced need to upgrade existing visual marketing systems; | ||
| introduction of products by our competitors; | ||
| lower prices offered by our competitors; and | ||
| changes in budgets and purchasing priorities. |
Our prospective customers routinely require education regarding the use and benefit of our
products. This may also lead to delays in receiving customers orders.
Adequate funds for our operations may not be available, requiring us to curtail our activities
significantly.
Based on our current and anticipated expense levels and our existing capital resources, we
anticipate that our cash will be adequate to fund our operations through 2011. Our future capital
requirements, however, will depend on many factors, including our ability to successfully market
and sell our products, develop new products and establish and leverage our strategic partnerships and business alliances. In order to meet
our needs should we
18
Table of Contents
not become cash flow positive or should we be unable to sustain positive cash
flow, we may be required to raise additional funding through public or private financings,
including equity financings. Any additional equity financings may be dilutive to shareholders, and
debt financing, if available, would likely involve restrictive covenants. Adequate funds for our
operations, whether from financial markets, collaborative or other arrangements, may not be
available when needed or on terms attractive to us, especially in light of recent turmoil in the
credit markets. If adequate funds are not available, our plans to expand our business may be
adversely affected and we could be required to curtail our activities significantly.
Difficulty in developing and maintaining relationships with third party manufacturers,
suppliers and service providers could adversely affect our ability to deliver our products and meet
our customers demands.
We rely on third parties to manufacture and supply parts and components for digital signage
systems we provide, and to provide order fulfillment, installation, repair services and technical
and customer support. Our strategy to rely on third party manufacturers, suppliers and service
providers involves a number of significant risks, including the loss of control over the
manufacturing process, the potential absence of adequate capacity, the unavailability of certain
parts and components used in our products and reduced control over delivery schedules, quality and
costs. For example, we do not generally maintain a significant inventory of parts or components,
but rely on suppliers to deliver necessary parts and components to third party manufacturers, in a
timely manner, based on our forecasts. If delivery of our products and services to our customers is
interrupted, or if our products experience quality problems, our ability to meet customer demands
would be harmed, causing a loss of revenue and harm to our reputation. Increased costs, transition
difficulties and lead times involved in developing additional or new third party relationships
could adversely affect our ability to deliver our products and meet our customers demands and harm
our business.
Reductions in hardware costs will likely decrease hardware pricing to our customers and would
reduce our per unit revenue.
Our pricing includes a standard percentage markup over our cost of digital signage systems,
such as computers and display monitors. As such, any decrease in our costs to acquire such
components from third parties will likely be reflected as a decrease in our hardware pricing to our
customers. Therefore, reductions in such hardware costs could potentially reduce our revenues.
Because our sales approach currently includes strategic partners and business alliances, we
expect to face risks not faced by companies with only internal sales forces.
We currently sell most of our digital signage systems and software licenses through an
internal sales force. We believe our future success will depend on such sales force and our ability
to attract and form relationships with strategic partners and business alliances. We may not,
however, be successful in forming these types of relationships, which could result in us being
unable to expand our sales network to generate revenue. Our anticipated reliance on strategic
partners and business alliances involves several risks, including the following:
| we may not be able to adequately train our strategic partners and those with which we have business alliances to sell and service our software and services; | ||
| they may emphasize competitors products or decline to promote and sell our software and services; | ||
| arrangements with our partners and business alliances can be terminated by either party at any time and do not require any material financial commitment; | ||
| channel conflict may arise between other third parties and/or our internal sales staff; and | ||
| software to manage content may be given away. |
Hardware companies may include digital signage software with functionality similar to
RoninCast® as an integrated hardware and software solution, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
19
Table of Contents
We have provided digital signage content management software to NEC. Our software development
agreement with NEC provided that NEC would own the software that we wrote. NEC intends to bundle
this software with hardware that they sell to their digital signage customers. While the software
developed for NEC does not encompass all of the features and functions of our proprietary
RoninCast® software, the NEC software enables digital signage customers to implement basic digital
signage applications. While we believe that a certain number of those NEC customers beginning with
the NEC software may come to want or need enhanced functionality of the RoninCast® software
product, there is a risk that bundled software will cannibalize the demand for more fully featured
products like RoninCast® digital signage software. If bundling digital signage content management
software with hardware becomes an industry standard, we could risk losing software licensing sales.
It is difficult for us to predict whether, when or the extent to which bundling digital signage
content management software with hardware will become customary. It is also difficult to predict
the functionality of the software that hardware manufacturers may bundle with hardware. If more
sophisticated and fully featured software is bundled with hardware, that bundling may negatively
impact our RoninCast® software license sales and adversely affect our business.
Our industry is characterized by frequent technological change. If we are unable to adapt our
products and services and develop new products and services to keep up with these rapid changes, we
will not be able to obtain or maintain market share.
The market for our products and services is characterized by rapidly changing technology,
evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, heavy competition and frequent new product
and service introductions. If we fail to develop new products and services or modify or improve
existing products and services in response to these changes in technology, customer demands or
industry standards, our products and services could become less competitive or obsolete.
We must respond to changing technology and industry standards in a timely and cost-effective
manner. We may not be successful in using new technologies, developing new products and services or
enhancing existing products and services in a timely and cost effective manner. Our pursuit of
necessary technology may require substantial time and expense as experienced with our most recently
launched product, RoninCast®X. We may need to license new technologies to respond to technological
change. These licenses may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We
may not succeed in adapting our products and services to new technologies as they emerge.
Furthermore, even if we successfully adapt our products and services, these new technologies or
enhancements may not achieve market acceptance.
Our future success depends on key personnel and our ability to attract and retain additional
personnel.
Our key personnel include:
| Scott W. Koller, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and | ||
| Darin P. McAreavey, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
If we fail to retain our key personnel or to attract, retain and motivate other qualified
employees, our ability to maintain and develop our business may be adversely affected. Our future
success depends significantly on the continued service of our key technical, sales and senior
management personnel and their ability to execute our growth strategy. The loss of the services of
our key employees could harm our business. We may be unable to retain our employees or to attract,
assimilate and retain other highly qualified employees who could migrate to other employers who
offer competitive or superior compensation packages.
Our results of operations may depend upon selling our products and services to customers
requiring large-scale rollouts and large-scale monitoring and maintenance, which we have not
previously conducted.
Our results of operations may depend upon selling our products and services to those
companies, and within those industries, that have many sites that could benefit from digital
signage systems. Digital signage systems installation projects deploying hundreds or even thousands
of systems present significant technical and logistical
20
Table of Contents
challenges that we have not yet demonstrated our ability to overcome. Digital signage technology employs sophisticated hardware and
software that constantly evolves. Sites into which digital signage systems may be installed vary
widely, including such factors as interference with wireless networks, ambient light, extremes of
temperature and other factors that may make each individual location virtually unique. Managing the
process of installing hundreds or thousands of dynamic, complicated digital signage systems into
unique environments may present difficulties that we have not yet faced on projects performed to
date with smaller numbers of digital signage systems. If our customers opt to engage us to provide
system monitoring and maintenance services through our network operations center, or NOC, on one or
more large-scale implementations, we may not successfully or profitably monitor and maintain the
hardware, software and content in a manner satisfactory to our customers or in compliance with our
contractual obligations. The efficiency and effectiveness of NOC monitoring and maintenance are
directly affected by our software and that softwares ability to monitor our customers systems.
For large-scale implementations, we may need to further develop our software to facilitate
efficient and effective system monitoring and maintenance. We cannot assure you that we will
succeed in developing our software, digital signage systems, project management and infrastructure
to successfully implement, monitor, manage and maintain large-scale implementation projects or
ongoing operations. Our failure to do so could harm our business and financial condition.
Our ability to execute our business strategy depends on our ability to protect our
intellectual property, and if any third parties make unauthorized use of our intellectual property,
or if our intellectual property rights are successfully challenged, our competitive position and
business could suffer.
Our success and ability to compete depends substantially on our proprietary technologies. We
regard our copyrights, service marks, trademarks, trade secrets and similar intellectual property
as critical to our success, and we rely on trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and
confidentiality agreements with our employees, customers and others to protect our proprietary
rights. Despite our precautions, unauthorized third parties might copy certain portions of our
software or reverse engineer and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition,
confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately protect against disclosure
of our proprietary information.
As of March 22, 2011, we had received one design patent, filed three U.S. patent applications
and had one Canadian patent application pending relating to various aspects of our RoninCast®
delivery system. We cannot provide assurance that any additional patents will be granted. Even if
they are granted, our patents may be successfully challenged by others or invalidated. In addition,
any patents that may be granted to us may not provide us a significant competitive advantage.
Although we have been granted patents and trademarks, they could be challenged in the future. If
future trademark registrations are not approved because third parties own these trademarks, our use
of these trademarks would be restricted unless we enter into arrangements with the third party
owners, which might not be possible on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we fail to
protect or enforce our intellectual property rights successfully, our competitive position could
suffer. We may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual
property rights. We may not be able to detect infringement and may lose competitive position in the
market. In addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing
technologies. Intellectual property rights may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign
countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share.
Our industry is characterized by frequent intellectual property litigation, and we could face
claims of infringement by others in our industry. Such claims are costly and add uncertainty to our
business strategy.
The digital media and communications industry is characterized by uncertain and conflicting
intellectual property claims and frequent intellectual property litigation, especially regarding
patent rights. We could be subject to claims of infringement of third party intellectual property
rights, which could result in significant expense and could ultimately result in the loss of our
intellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties may assert patent, copyright,
trademark or other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business.
In addition, because patent applications in the United States are not publicly disclosed until the
patent is issued, applications may have been filed which relate to our industry of which we are not
aware. We have in the past and may in the future receive notices of claims that our products infringe or may infringe
intellectual property rights of third parties. Any litigation to determine the validity of these
claims, including claims arising through our contractual indemnification of our business partners,
regardless of their merit or resolution, would likely be costly
21
Table of Contents
and time consuming and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. If any such litigation resulted in
an adverse ruling, we could be required to:
| pay substantial damages; | ||
| cease the development, use, licensing or sale of infringing products; | ||
| discontinue the use of certain technology; or | ||
| obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party claiming infringement, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. |
Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that interfere with, or
exploit security flaws in, our products and services.
Our business may be adversely affected by malicious applications that make changes to our
customers computer systems and interfere with the operation and use of our products. These
applications may attempt to interfere with our ability to communicate with our customers devices.
The interference may occur without disclosure to or consent from our customers, resulting in a
negative experience that our customers may associate with our products. These applications may be
difficult or impossible to uninstall or disable, may reinstall themselves and may circumvent other
applications efforts to block or remove them. In addition, we offer a number of products and
services that our customers download to their computers or that they rely on to store information
and transmit information over the Internet. These products and services are subject to attack by
viruses, worms and other malicious software programs, which could jeopardize the security of
information stored in a customers computer or in our computer systems and networks. The ability to
reach customers and provide them with a superior product experience is critical to our success. If
our efforts to combat these malicious applications fail, or if our products and services have
actual or perceived vulnerabilities, there may be claims based on such failure or our reputation
may be harmed, which would damage our business and financial condition.
We compete with other companies that have more resources, which puts us at a competitive
disadvantage.
The market for digital signage software and systems is highly competitive and we expect
competition to increase in the future. Some of our competitors or potential competitors may have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than our company. These
competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the development,
promotion and sale of their products than our company.
We expect competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to
introduce new products, services and technologies. Successful new product and service introductions
or enhancements by our competitors could reduce sales and the market acceptance of our products and
services, cause intense price competition or make our products and services obsolete. To be
competitive, we must continue to invest significant resources in research and development, sales
and marketing and customer support. If we do not have sufficient resources to make these
investments or are unable to make the technological advances necessary to be competitive, our
competitive position will suffer. Increased competition could result in price reductions, fewer
customer orders, reduced margins and loss of market share. Our failure to compete successfully
against current or future competitors could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We may be subject to sales and other taxes, which could have adverse effects on our business.
In accordance with current federal, state and local tax laws, and the constitutional
limitations thereon, we currently collect sales, use or other similar taxes in state and local
jurisdictions where we have a physical presence that we understand to be sufficient to require us to collect and remit such taxes. One or more
state or local jurisdictions may seek to impose sales tax collection obligations on us and other
out-of-state companies which engage in commerce with persons in that state. Several U.S. states
have taken various initiatives to prompt more
22
Table of Contents
sellers to collect local and state sales taxes. Furthermore, tax law and the interpretation of constitutional limitations thereon are subject to
change. In addition, new or expanded business operations in states where we do not currently have a
physical presence sufficient to obligate us to collect and remit taxes could subject shipments of
goods into or provision of services in such states to sales tax under current or future laws. If
our company grows, increased sales of our products and services to locations in various states and
municipalities may obligate us to collect and remit sales tax and to pay state income and other
taxes based upon increased presence in those jurisdictions. We will endeavor to collect, remit and
pay those state and local taxes that we owe according to applicable law. State and local tax laws
are, however, subject to change, highly complex and diverse from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. If
one or more state or local jurisdictions successfully asserts that we must collect sales or other
taxes beyond our current practices or that we owe unpaid sales or other taxes and penalties, it
could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We may be subject to U.S. and international tax authorities challenging our transfer price
allocation, which could have adverse effects on our business.
Currently a significant portion of our revenue is generated within the United States from
products and services provided through our Canadian operations. As a result, we are required to
prepare a transfer price allocation between our U.S. and Canadian entities. This allocation
involves assumptions and estimates which may be challenged by the I.R.S. or Canadian tax
authorities. In the event one of these tax authorities successfully challenges our transfer price
allocation, it may result in us being subject to corporate taxes and penalties.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange
rates, particularly fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian
dollar.
Since a portion of our operations and revenue occur outside the United States and in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our results could be adversely affected by changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. Additionally, given our ownership of Wireless Ronin Technologies
(Canada), Inc., changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar can
significantly affect inter-company balances and our results of operations.
We are subject to various restrictive covenants under our agreement with Silicon Valley Bank
which may prevent us from taking actions that could be beneficial to our shareholders without
Silicon Valley Banks consent, including mergers, acquisitions and the incurrence of additional
indebtedness.
Pursuant to our loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, we generally require the
prior written consent of Silicon Valley Bank to, among other things:
dispose of assets;
change our business;
liquidate or dissolve;
change CEO or COO (replacements must be satisfactory to the lender);
enter into any transaction in which our shareholders who were not shareholders
immediately prior to such transaction own more than 40% of our voting stock (subject to
limited exceptions) after the transaction;
merge or consolidate with any other person;
acquire all or substantially all of the capital stock or property of another person;
or
become liable for any indebtedness (other than permitted indebtedness).
If we determine that taking one of these actions would be in our best interests and we are
unable to obtain the prior written consent of Silicon Valley Bank to do so, we would be required to
repay the amount owing Silicon Valley Bank at that time, which may not be advisable or even
practical, or forgo taking the action for which we sought consent. In such scenario, we would be
unable to borrow additional sums under the agreement with Silicon Valley Bank which could adversely
affect our liquidity and capital resources. Additionally, we are required to
maintain a certain minimum tangible net worth level at either the time of an advancement or
while there is an outstanding balance owed to Silicon Valley Bank. Our failure to meet or maintain
the minimum tangible net worth requirement will also restrict our ability to borrow additional sums
under this agreement. Our inability to take
23
Table of Contents
actions due to the restrictive covenants or our need to repay amounts borrowed and effective loss of the line of credit could have a material adverse
effect on our business and financial condition.
We could have liability arising out of our previous sales of unregistered securities.
Prior to our initial public offering, we financed our development and operations with proceeds
from the sale of debt and equity securities to accredited investors. These securities were not
registered under federal or state securities laws because we believed such sales were exempt under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and under Regulation
D under the Securities Act. In addition, we issued stock purchase warrants to independent
contractors and associates as compensation or as incentives for future performance in reliance upon
the exemption provided by Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act. We have
received no claim that such sales were in violation of securities registration requirements under
such laws, but should a claim be made, we would have the burden of demonstrating that the sales
were exempt from such registration requirements. In addition, it is possible that a purchaser of
our securities could claim that disclosures to them in connection with such sales were inadequate,
creating potential liability under the anti-fraud provisions of federal and state securities or
other laws. If successful, claims under such laws could require us to pay damages, perform
rescission offers, and/or pay interest on amounts invested and attorneys fees and costs. Depending
upon the magnitude of a judgment against us in any such actions, our financial condition and
prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Securities
We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements for which our accounting, other
management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared.
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses, including
costs associated with reporting requirements and corporate governance requirements, including
requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and rules implemented by the SEC and NASDAQ, which are subject to
change from time to time.
If we identify significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting that we cannot remediate in a timely manner, investors and others may lose
confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, and the trading price of our common
stock and ability to obtain any necessary equity or debt financing could suffer. In addition, if
our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to rely on our internal control over
financial reporting in connection with its audit of our financial statements, and if it is unable
to devise alternative procedures in order to satisfy itself as to the material accuracy of our
financial statements and related disclosures, it is possible that we would be unable to file our
annual report with the SEC, which could also adversely affect the trading price of our common stock
and our ability to secure any necessary additional financing, and could result in the delisting of
our common stock from NASDAQ and the ineligibility of our common stock for quotation on the OTC
Bulletin Board. In that event, the liquidity of our common stock would be severely limited and the
market price of our common stock would likely decline significantly.
In addition, the foregoing regulatory requirements could make it difficult or costly for us to
obtain certain types of insurance, including directors and officers liability insurance, and we
may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to
obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult
for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, on board
committees or as executive officers.
If we fail to comply with the NASDAQ requirements for continued listing, our common stock
could be delisted from NASDAQ, which could hinder our investors ability to trade our common stock
in the secondary market.
Generally, our common stock must sustain a minimum bid price of at least $1.00 per share and
we must satisfy the other requirements for continued listing on NASDAQ. If our common stock is
delisted from NASDAQ, trading in our common stock would likely thereafter be conducted in the
over-the-counter markets in the so-called pink sheets or the OTC Bulletin Board. In such event, the
liquidity of our common stock would likely be impaired,
24
Table of Contents
not only in the number of shares which could be bought and sold, but also through delays in the timing of the transactions, and there
would likely be a reduction in the coverage of our company by securities analysts and the news
media, thereby resulting in lower prices for our common stock than might otherwise prevail.
In August 2010, we received a deficiency letter from the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ)
Listing Qualifications Department notifying us that, based upon our Form 10-Q filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission in August 2010, we no longer complied with NASDAQ Marketplace
Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A), which requires a minimum of $10.0 million in stockholders equity for
listing on the NASDAQ Global Market. In September 2010, we were notified by NASDAQ that our
application to transfer the listing of our common stock from the NASDAQ Global Market to the NASDAQ
Capital Market had been approved. The Companys common stock transferred to the NASDAQ Capital
Market in October 2010, and continues to be traded under the symbol RNIN.
The market price of our stock may be subject to wide fluctuations.
The price of our common stock may fluctuate, depending on many factors, some of which are
beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could
cause our investors to lose part or all of their investment in our shares of common stock. Factors
that could cause fluctuations include, but are not limited to, the following:
| price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time; | ||
| significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of companies in our industry; | ||
| actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or in the expectations of financial market analysts; | ||
| investor perceptions of our industry, in general, and our company, in particular; | ||
| the operating and stock performance of comparable companies; | ||
| general economic conditions and trends; | ||
| major catastrophic events; | ||
| loss of external funding sources; | ||
| sales of large blocks of our stock or sales by insiders; or | ||
| departures of key personnel. |
Our articles of incorporation, bylaws and Minnesota law may discourage takeovers and business
combinations that our shareholders might consider to be in their best interests.
Anti-takeover provisions of our articles of incorporation, bylaws, and Minnesota law could
diminish the opportunity for shareholders to participate in acquisition proposals at a price above
the then current market price of our common stock. For example, while we have no present plans to
issue any preferred stock, our board of directors, without further shareholder approval, may issue
up to approximately 16.7 million shares of undesignated preferred stock and fix the powers,
preferences, rights and limitations of such class or series, which could adversely affect the
voting power of our common stock. In addition, our bylaws provide for an advance notice procedure
for nomination of candidates to our board of directors that could have the effect of delaying,
deterring or preventing a change in control. Further, as a Minnesota corporation, we are subject to provisions of the Minnesota
Business Corporation Act, or MBCA, regarding control share acquisitions and business
combinations. We may, in the future, consider adopting additional anti-takeover measures. The
authority of our board of directors to issue undesignated preferred stock and the anti-takeover
provisions of the MBCA, as well as any future anti-takeover measures adopted by us,
25
Table of Contents
may, in certain circumstances, delay, deter or prevent takeover attempts and other changes in control of our
company not approved by our board of directors.
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable
future.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our shares of common stock. We intend to
retain any future earnings to fund the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, we
do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future. As
a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be the sole source of gain for
investors in our common stock for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, our loan and security
agreement with Silicon Valley Bank contains a restrictive covenant that precludes us from paying
dividends without Silicon Valley Banks consent.
A substantial number of shares are eligible for future sale by our current investors and the
sale of those shares could adversely affect our stock price.
We have registered for resale approximately 2.3 million shares of our outstanding common stock
and approximately 1.6 million shares underlying warrants under the registration statement that was
originally declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in February 2007.
If these shares, or additional shares that may be eligible for resale into the market, are sold, or
if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of our common
stock could be adversely affected.
ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2 PROPERTIES
We conduct our U.S. operations from a leased facility located at 5929 Baker Road in
Minnetonka, Minnesota. We lease approximately 19,000 square feet of office and warehouse space
under a lease that extends through January 2018 as part of an amendment we entered into in July
2010. In consideration for this extension, the landlord provided us with a leasehold improvement
allowance totaling $0.2 million and an initial reduction in base rent per square foot. The
amendment also contains a rent escalation provision, along with a requirement of maintaining a
letter of credit in the amount of $300,000 as collateral which will be released as follows: to
$240,000 on August 1, 2011; to $180,000 on August 1, 2012; to $120,000 on August 1, 2013; to
$60,000 on August 1, 2014; and to $0 on August 1, 2015. The amount of the letter of credit as of
December 31, 2010 was $300,000. In addition, we lease office space of approximately 10,000 square
feet to support our Canadian operations at a facility located at 4510 Rhodes Drive, Suite 800,
Windsor, Ontario under a lease that, as amended, extends through June 30, 2014. As defined in the
lease, we have the one-time option to cancel the lease on June 30, 2012 for a fee of approximately
$39,000.
We believe the facilities used in our operations are suitable for their respective uses and
are adequate to meet our current needs.
ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We were not party to any material legal proceedings as of March 22, 2011.
ITEM 4 (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
26
Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5 MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock traded under the symbol RNIN on the NASDAQ Global Market from September 21,
2007 to October 3, 2010, at which time trading transferred to the NASDAQ Capital Market, the
exchange on which it was previously listed since November 27, 2006. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices for our common stock as reported
by the applicable market. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
High | Low | |||||||
2010 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 3.83 | $ | 1.93 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 2.64 | $ | 1.08 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 1.91 | $ | 1.10 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 1.53 | $ | 1.11 | ||||
2009 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 2.32 | $ | 0.80 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 3.03 | $ | 1.60 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 4.07 | $ | 2.19 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 3.99 | $ | 2.62 |
Shareholders
As of March 22, 2011, we had 90 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to
retain future earnings, if any, to operate and expand our business, and we do not anticipate paying
cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the
future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of
operations, earnings, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed
relevant by our board of directors Furthermore, our loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley
Bank contains a restrictive covenant that precludes us from paying dividends without Silicon Valley
Banks consent.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters in Item 12 for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity
compensation plans.
Stock Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares our cumulative shareholder return with the NASDAQ
Composite Index and issuers with similar market capitalizations, as denoted by the Russell 2000
Index (because we are unable to reasonably identify a peer group). The table below compares the
cumulative total return assuming $100 was invested as of November 27, 2006 (the date of our initial
public offering), in our common stock, the
27
Table of Contents
NASDAQ Composite Index and the Russell 2000 Index. The
graph assumes the reinvestment of all dividends. The indexes are weighted based on market
capitalization at the time of each reported data point.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Sales of Unregistered Securities During the Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2010
None.
ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations,
and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K to fully understand factors that may affect the
comparability of the information presented below.
28
Table of Contents
(in thousands, except per share amounts.)
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 10,133 | $ | 13,705 | $ | 16,157 | $ | 34,923 | $ | 16,700 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
11,242 | 15,347 | 18,560 | 40,369 | 17,546 | |||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
2,659 | 1,589 | 2,387 | 4,610 | 1,653 | |||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
40 | | | 71 | 155 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,699 | 1,589 | 2,387 | 4,681 | 1,808 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
$ | 8,543 | $ | 13,758 | $ | 16,173 | $ | 35,688 | $ | 15,738 |
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 8,567 | $ | 5,009 | $ | 7,381 | $ | 5,985 | $ | 3,145 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
4,582 | 3,586 | 6,589 | 3,892 | 1,545 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,985 | 1,423 | 792 | 2,093 | 1,600 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative and other |
8,976 | 9,509 | 19,564 | 12,210 | 5,043 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
2,864 | 2,167 | 2,541 | 1,198 | 876 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
11,840 | 11,676 | 22,105 | 13,408 | 5,919 | |||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(7,855 | ) | (10,253 | ) | (21,313 | ) | (11,315 | ) | (4,319 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(28 | ) | 70 | 621 | 1,229 | (10,469 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (7,883 | ) | $ | (10,183 | ) | $ | (20,692 | ) | $ | (10,086 | ) | $ | (14,788 | ) | |||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share |
$ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.67 | ) | $ | (1.41 | ) | $ | (0.82 | ) | $ | (9.71 | ) | |||||
Basic and diluted weighted average shares
outstanding |
17,901 | 15,274 | 14,664 | 12,314 | 1,523 | |||||||||||||||
ITEM 7 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Although we believe that, in making any such statement, our
expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such statement may be influenced by
factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those
projected. When used in the following discussion, the words anticipates, believes,
expects, intends, plans, estimates and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our
management, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those anticipated. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those anticipated, certain of which are beyond our control, are set forth in
Item 1A under the caption Risk Factors.
Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those
expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that
any of the events anticipated by forward-looking statements will occur or, if any of them do
occur, what impact they will have on us. We caution you to keep in mind the cautions and risks
described in this document and to refrain from attributing undue certainty to any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the document in which they
appear. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement.
29
Table of Contents
Overview
We provide digital signage software, hardware and services solutions to customers who use our
products and services in certain retail and service markets. Through our proprietary RoninCast®X
software, we provide enterprise, web-based and hosted content delivery systems that manage,
schedule and deliver digital content over
wireless and wired networks. We also provide custom interactive software solutions, content
engineering and creative services to our customers.
While the digital signage system solutions that we provide have application in a wide variety
of industries, we focus on three primary markets: (1) automotive, (2) food service (including QSR,
fast casual and managed food services markets), and (3) branded retail. The industries in which we
sell goods and services are not new but their application of digital signage solutions is
relatively new (within the last five years) and these industries have not widely accepted or
adopted digital signage. As a result, we remain an early stage company without an established
history of profitability, or substantial or steady revenue. We believe this characterization
applies to our competitors as well, all of which are working to promote broader adoption of digital
signage solutions and to develop profitable, substantial and steady sources of revenue.
We believe that the adoption of digital signage technology will increase substantially in
years to come both in industries on which we currently focus and in other industries. We also
believe that adoption of digital signage depends not only upon the software and services that we
provide but upon the cost of hardware used to process and display content in digital signage
systems. Digital media players and flat panel displays constitute a large portion of the
expenditure customers make relative to the entire cost of digital signage systems. Costs of these
digital media players and flat panel displays have historically decreased and we believe will
continue to do so, though we do not manufacture either product and do not substantially affect the
overall markets for these products. If prices continue to decline for this hardware, we believe
that adoption of digital signage technology is likely to increase, though we cannot predict a
precise rate at which adoption will occur.
Management focuses on a wide variety of financial measurements to assess our financial health
and prospects but principally upon (1) sales, to measure the adoption of digital signage technology
by our customers, (2) cost of sales and gross profit, particularly expressed as gross profit
percentage, to determine if sales have been made at levels of profit necessary to cover operating
expenses on a long-term basis (based upon assumptions regarding adoption of digital signage
technology), (3) sales of hardware relative to software and services, understanding that hardware
typically provides a lower gross profit margin than do software license fees and services, (4)
operating expenses so that management can appropriately match those expenses with sales, and (5)
current assets, especially cash and cash equivalents used to fund operating losses thus far
incurred.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Wireless Ronin Technologies (Canada), Inc. (RNIN Canada), an
Ontario, Canada provincial corporation located in Windsor, Ontario, maintains a vertical specific
focus in the automotive industry and houses our content engineering operation. RNIN Canada develops
digital content and sales support systems to help retailers train their sales staff and educate
their customers at the point of sale. Today, the capabilities of this operation are integrated with
our historical business to provide content solutions to all of our clients.
Our company and our subsidiary sell products and services primarily throughout North America.
Our Sources of Revenue
We generate revenues through system sales, license fees and separate service fees, including
consulting, content development and implementation services, as well as ongoing customer support
and maintenance, including product upgrades. We currently market and sell our software and service
solutions primarily through our direct sales force, but we also utilize strategic partnerships and
business alliances.
30
Table of Contents
Our Expenses
Our expenses are primarily comprised of three categories: sales and marketing, research and
development and general and administrative. Sales and marketing expenses include salaries and
benefits for our sales associates and commissions paid on sales. This category also includes
amounts spent on the hardware and software we use to prospect new customers, including those
expenses incurred in trade shows and product demonstrations. Our research and development expenses
represent the salaries and benefits of those individuals who develop and maintain our software
products including RoninCast® and other software applications we design and sell to our customers.
Our general and administrative expenses consist of corporate overhead, including administrative
salaries, real property lease payments, salaries and benefits for our corporate officers and other
expenses such as legal and accounting fees.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S., or GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In recording transactions and
balances resulting from business operations, we use estimates based on the best information
available. We use estimates for such items as depreciable lives, volatility factors in determining
fair value of options and warrants, tax provisions, recognition of revenue under fixed price
contracts, provisions for uncollectible receivables and deferred revenue. We revise the recorded
estimates when better information is available, facts change or we can determine actual amounts.
These revisions can affect operating results. We have identified below the following accounting
policies that we consider to be critical.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue primarily from these sources:
| Software and software license sales | ||
| System hardware sales | ||
| Professional service revenue | ||
| Software design and development services | ||
| Implementation services | ||
| Maintenance and hosting support contracts |
We apply the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 605-985, Revenue
Recognition: Software (or ASC 605-35) to all transactions involving the sale of software licenses.
In the event of a multiple element arrangement, we evaluate if each element represents a separate
unit of accounting, taking into account all factors following the guidelines set forth in FASB ASC
605-985-25-5.
We recognize revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has
occurred, which is when product title transfers to the customer, or services have been rendered;
(iii) customer payment is deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies and significant
uncertainties; and (iv) collection is probable. We assess collectability based on a number of
factors, including the customers past payment history and its current creditworthiness. If it is
determined that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the revenue and recognizes
it at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash
payment. If an acceptance period is required, revenue is recognized upon the earlier of customer
acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period.
Multiple-Element Arrangements We enter into arrangements with customers that include a
combination of software products, system hardware, maintenance and support, or installation and
training services. We allocate the total arrangement fee among the various elements of the
arrangement based on the relative fair value of each of the undelivered elements determined by
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE). In software arrangements for which we do not have VSOE
of fair value for all elements, revenue is deferred until the earlier of when VSOE is determined
for the undelivered elements (residual method) or when all elements for which we do not have VSOE
of fair value have been delivered.
31
Table of Contents
The VSOE for maintenance and support services is based upon the renewal rate for continued
service arrangements. The VSOE of installation and training services is established based upon
pricing for the services. The VSOE of software and licenses is based on the normal pricing and
discounting for the product when sold separately.
Each element of our multiple element arrangements qualifies for separate accounting. However,
when a sale includes both software and maintenance, we defer revenue under the residual method of
accounting. Under this method, the undelivered maintenance and support fees included in the price
of software is amortized ratably over the period the services are provided. We defer maintenance
and support fees based upon the customers renewal rate for these services.
Software and software license sales
We recognize revenue when a fixed fee order has been received and delivery has occurred to the
customer. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable and free of contingencies based upon
signed agreements received from the customer confirming terms of the transaction. Software is
delivered to customers electronically or on a CD-ROM, and license files are delivered
electronically.
System hardware sales
We recognize revenue on system hardware sales generally upon shipment of the product or
customer acceptance depending upon contractual arrangements with the customer. Shipping charges
billed to customers are included in sales and the related shipping costs are included in cost of
sales.
Professional service revenue
Included in services and other revenues is revenue derived from implementation, maintenance
and support contracts, content development, software development and training. The majority of
consulting and implementation services and accompanying agreements qualify for separate accounting.
Implementation and content development services are bid either on a fixed-fee basis or on a
time-and-materials basis. For time-and-materials contracts, we recognize revenue as services are
performed. For fixed-fee contracts, we recognize revenue upon completion of specific contractual
milestones or by using the percentage-of-completion method.
Software design and development services
Revenue from contracts for technology integration consulting services where we
design/redesign, build and implement new or enhanced systems applications and related processes for
clients are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with FASB ASC
605-985-25-88 through 107. Percentage-of-completion accounting involves calculating the
percentage of services provided during the reporting period compared to the total estimated
services to be provided over the duration of the contract. Estimated revenues for applying the
percentage-of-completion method include estimated incentives for which achievement of defined goals
is deemed probable. This method is followed where reasonably dependable estimates of revenues and
costs can be made. We measure our progress for completion based on either the hours worked as a
percentage of the total number of hours of the project or by delivery and customer acceptance of
specific milestones as outlined per the terms of the agreement with the customer. Estimates of
total contract revenue and costs are continuously monitored during the term of the contract, and
recorded revenue and costs are subject to revision as the contract progresses. Such revisions may
result in increases or decreases to revenue and income and are reflected in the financial
statements in the periods in which they are first identified. If estimates indicate that a contract
loss will occur, a loss provision is recorded in the period in which the loss first becomes
probable and reasonably estimable. Contract losses are determined to be the amount by which the
estimated direct and indirect costs of the contract exceed the estimated total revenue that will be
generated by the contract and are included in cost of sales and classified in accrued expenses in
the balance sheet. Our presentation of revenue recognized on a contract completion basis has been
consistently applied for all periods presented.
We classify the revenue and associated cost on the Services and Other line within the
Sales and Cost of Sales sections of the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In all cases
where we apply the contract method of
32
Table of Contents
accounting, our only deliverable is professional services,
thus, we believe presenting the revenue on a single line is appropriate.
Costs and estimated earnings recognized in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts are
recorded as unbilled services and are included in accounts receivable on the balance sheet.
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are recorded as
deferred revenue until revenue recognition criteria are met.
Implementation services
Implementation services revenue is recognized when installation is completed.
Maintenance and hosting support contracts
Maintenance and hosting support consists of software updates and support. Software updates
provide customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades and maintenance releases and
patches released during the term of the support period. Support includes access to technical
support personnel for software and hardware issues. We also offer a hosting service through our
network operations center, or NOC, allowing the ability to monitor and support our customers
networks 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.
Maintenance and hosting support revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance
contract, which is typically one to three years. Maintenance and support is renewable by the
customer. Rates for maintenance and support, including subsequent renewal rates, are typically
established based upon a specified percentage of net license fees as set forth in the arrangement.
Our hosting support agreement fees are based on the level of service we provide to our customers,
which can range from monitoring the health of our customers network to supporting a sophisticated
web portal.
Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share
Basic and diluted loss per common share for all periods presented is computed using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Basic weighted average shares outstanding
include only outstanding common shares. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing
net loss by the weighted average common and potential dilutive common shares outstanding computed
in accordance with the treasury stock method. Shares reserved for outstanding stock warrants and
options totaling 3.8 million, 3.2 million and 3.6 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
were excluded from the computation of loss per share as their effect was antidilutive due to our
net loss in each of those years.
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are recognized in the financial statements for the tax consequences in
future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial
reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates. Temporary differences arise
from net operating losses, reserves for uncollectible accounts receivables and inventory,
differences in depreciation methods, and accrued expenses. Valuation allowances are established
when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of
share-based awards that are ultimately expected to vest during the period. The fair value of each
stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The fair value of restricted stock is determined based on the number of shares granted and the
closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense for all
share-based payment awards is recognized using the straight-line amortization method over the
33
Table of Contents
vesting period. Stock-based compensation expense of $0.9 million, $0.7 million and $1.3 million
was charged to operating expenses during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No tax benefit has
been recorded due to the full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets that we have recorded.
We account for equity instruments issued for services and goods to non-employees under FASB
ASC 505-50-1 Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services and FASB ASC 505-50-25 Accounting
Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees.
Generally, the equity instruments issued for services and goods are shares of our common
stock,warrants or options to purchase shares of our common stock. These shares, warrants or options
are either fully-vested and exercisable at the date of grant or vest over a
certain period during which services are provided. We expense the fair market value of these
securities over the period in which the related services are received.
See Note 8 in the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for further information
regarding the impact of FASB ASC 718-10 and the assumptions we use to calculate the fair value of
stock-based compensation.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations for the years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 8,567 | $ | 5,009 | $ | 7,381 | ||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
4,582 | 3,586 | 6,589 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
3,985 | 1,423 | 792 | |||||||||
Sales and marketing expenses |
2,329 | 2,520 | 3,999 | |||||||||
Research and development expenses |
2,864 | 2,167 | 2,541 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
5,963 | 6,168 | 11,258 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
684 | 771 | 1,226 | |||||||||
Impairment of network equipment held for sale |
| | 1,766 | |||||||||
Impairment of intangible assets |
| | 1,265 | |||||||||
Termination of partnership agreement |
| 50 | 50 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
11,840 | 11,676 | 22,105 | |||||||||
Operating loss |
(7,855 | ) | (10,253 | ) | (21,313 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(58 | ) | (6 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||
Interest income |
30 | 76 | 647 | |||||||||
Other |
| | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income |
(28 | ) | 70 | 621 | ||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (7,883 | ) | $ | (10,183 | ) | $ | (20,692 | ) | |||
34
Table of Contents
Our results of operations as a percentage of sales for the years ended 2010, 2009 and
2008 were as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
53.5 | % | 71.6 | % | 89.3 | % | ||||||
Gross profit |
46.5 | % | 28.4 | % | 10.7 | % | ||||||
Sales and marketing expenses |
27.2 | % | 50.3 | % | 54.2 | % | ||||||
Research and development expenses |
33.4 | % | 43.3 | % | 34.4 | % | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
69.6 | % | 123.1 | % | 152.5 | % | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
8.0 | % | 15.4 | % | 16.6 | % | ||||||
Impairment of network equipment held for sale |
| | 23.9 | % | ||||||||
Impairment of intangible assets |
| | 17.1 | % | ||||||||
Termination of partnership agreement |
| 1.0 | % | 0.7 | % | |||||||
Total operating expenses |
138.2 | % | 233.1 | % | 299.4 | % | ||||||
Operating loss |
(91.7 | %) | (204.7 | %) | (288.7 | %) | ||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(0.7 | %) | (0.1 | %) | (0.3 | %) | ||||||
Interest income |
0.4 | % | 1.5 | % | 8.8 | % | ||||||
Other |
| | (0.1 | %) | ||||||||
Total other income |
(0.3 | %) | 1.4 | % | 8.4 | % | ||||||
Net loss |
(92.0 | %) | (203.3 | %) | (280.3 | %) | ||||||
2010 compared to 2009
Sales
Our sales increased 71% to $8.6 million in 2010 from $5.0 million in 2009. The year-over-year
increase in revenue was primarily attributable to revenue generated from our marquee customers,
including Chrysler, Aramark, YUM!/KFC and Thomson Reuters, in addition to new customers. Revenue
generated from Chrysler totaled $4.0 million 2010, which was up 457% from $0.7 million recognized
for the prior year. In addition to assisting Chrysler with its ongoing development needs related to
the iShowroom initiative during 2010, over half of our 2010 revenue from Chrysler came from its
orders for 800 digital signage systems as part of its branded tower salon to be installed at 200
dealers. Since the branded tower salon is a requirement of Chryslers dealer standards program,
which provides incentive dollars back to the dealers, we believe there will be additional orders
forthcoming. However, since dealer participation is not mandatory and we do not have a contract
with Chrysler requiring it to source all the various components of the solution through us, we are
unable to predict or forecast the timing or value of any future orders.
ARAMARK continues to deploy its food concepts, including Burger Studio and Topios, at many
colleges and universities within the United States. During 2010 we installed approximately 90 new
locations, which more than doubled the total number of ARAMARK sites managed by our network
operations center, or NOC, from the beginning of the year. Our sales to Aramark during 2010
totaled $1.1 million, representing an increase of 4% when compared to total sales in 2009.
We continued to penetrate further within YUM!s QSR brands in 2010 by deploying 10
KFC/TacoBell combination stores. Additionally, we installed a total of 40 new KFC stores,
bringing the total number of YUM!
35
Table of Contents
brand stores which we fully host and support through our NOC to
approximately 200 at the end of 2010. We continue to rollout digital menu boards for all new and
remodeled stores for KFC. Furthermore, KFC has begun to implement a new highly customized web
portal that we finished developing and delivered during in 2010.
Sales to Thomson Reuters increased 45% to $0.8 million in 2010 when compared to 2009, as we
continued to expand the number of InfoPoint digital signage locations. As of December 31, 2010, we
had a total of 350 locations we were actively supporting through our NOC.
Additionally in 2010, we received an order to deploy InfoPoint at 50 sites for a financial
services institution with over 3,000 locations. Lastly, our recurring hosting and support revenue
increased 140% in 2010 to $1.3 million when compared to 2009 as a result of an expansion of our
customer base from the deployments referenced above.
Due to the current economic environment and the lengthy sales cycle associated with deploying
large scale digital menu boards, we are not able to predict or forecast our future revenue with any
degree of precision at this time.
Cost of Sales
Our cost of sales increased 28% to $4.6 million in 2010 from $3.6 million in 2009. The
increase in cost of sales was due to the year-over-year increases in hardware sales and cost
associated with delivering our services, including installation, project management, software
development and content creation. On a percentage basis, our overall gross margin improved to 47%
in 2010 compared to 28% for the prior year. The primary reason for this increase was the favorable
hardware margin we were able to achieve from customers for whom we provided a turn-key digital
signage solution. In addition, sales of our RoninCast® software were up 96% in 2010 when compared
to 2009, which yielded a gross margin percentage of over 90% for both years. In addition, our
services margin continued to improve as the level of recurring hosting and services revenue
increased, which totaled $1.3 million in 2010 compared to $0.6 million in 2009. As a result we
experienced an improvement in our services gross margin of 25 percentage points to 42% when
comparing 2010 to 2009. Our ability to maintain these levels of gross margin on a percentage basis
can be impacted in any given quarter by shifts in our sales mix. However, we believe over the
long-term our gross margins on a percentage basis will continue to increase as our recurring
revenue grows.
Operating Expenses
Sales and marketing expense includes the salaries, employee benefits, commissions, stock
compensation expense, travel and overhead costs of our sales and marketing personnel, as well as
trade show activities and other marketing costs. Total sales and marketing expenses declined 8% to
$2.3 million in 2010 from $2.5 million in 2009. During 2010, our stock compensation expense, which
was lower by $0.2 million compared to 2009, was the primary reason for this decrease in our sales
and marketing expenses. Stock compensation expense totaled $0.1 million in 2010, compared to $0.3
million in the prior year. We continue to focus our efforts to maximize the return on investment
by attending many of the leading industry digital signage tradeshows, as we believe our presence is
necessary to attract and retain new customers. We traditionally incur higher levels of tradeshow
expenditures in the first quarter of our fiscal year compared to the remaining three quarters. Any
significant increase in our sales and marketing expenses in 2011 relative to 2010 would be the
result of higher levels of commission expense resulting from an increase in our revenue, as we do
not anticipate higher costs associated with tradeshows or marketing initiatives.
Research and development expense includes salaries, employee benefits, stock compensation
expense, related overhead costs and consulting fees associated with product development,
enhancements, upgrades, testing, quality assurance and documentation. Total research and
development expenses for 2010 increased 32% to $2.9 million from $2.2 million in 2009. The
year-over-year increase was primarily the result of higher levels of contractor and other
engineering consultant expenses as we finished up the first release of our next generation of
digital signage software, RoninCast®X. Since the majority of the development effort of this new
software platform was completed during 2010, we incurred additional outside resource costs which
primarily accounted for the increase in
36
Table of Contents
research and development expenses when compared to the
prior year period. Although we currently have no intention of significantly increasing our staff
levels in 2011, we may engage outside providers to assist in further
enhancements to our RoninCast®X software which is critical for our success as the requirements
for a more sophisticated dynamic digital signage platform continue to evolve.
General and administrative expense includes the salaries, employee benefits, stock
compensation expense and related overhead cost of our finance, information technology, human
resources and administrative employees, as well as legal and accounting expenses, consulting and
contractor fees and bad debt expense. Total general and administrative expenses for 2010 decreased
3% to $6.0 million from $6.2 million in 2009. The decline was primarily the result of a decrease
in compensation and benefits, along with reduced contractor costs, partially offset by higher
levels of stock compensation expense. The reduction in compensation and benefits was the direct
result of a cost optimization plan that was implemented during 2010, which included an overall
reduction in full-time employees. Offsetting these reductions was a $0.4 million increase in stock
compensation expense in 2010 when compared to 2009 as a result of new equity incentives provided to
both employees and outside contractors. We believe our general and administrative costs will not
increase significantly in 2011 when compared to 2010.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Our depreciation and amortization expense consists
primarily of depreciation of computer equipment and office furniture and the amortization of
purchased software and leasehold improvements made to our leased facilities. Depreciation and
amortization expense decreased 11% to $0.7 million in 2010 from $0.8 million in 2009. The decrease
was primarily due to the limited number of capital acquisitions during 2010.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased to $58,000 in 2010 from $6,000 in 2009. The increase was primarily
the result of $50,000 of expense recognized related to the fair value of the warrants issued to
Silicon Valley Bank as additional consideration for the $2.5 million loan and security agreement
dated March 18, 2010. The warrant vested 100% on date of grant and we are recognizing the fair
value, as determined using the Black-Scholes model, of $66,000 over the one-year life of the
agreement on a straight-line basis. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements regarding
the assumptions used in determining the fair value of this warrant.
2009 compared to 2008
Sales
Our sales decreased 32% to $5.0 million in 2009 from $7.4 million in 2008. The year-over-year
decline in revenue was primarily attributable to the lower levels of revenue generated from a
slowly-recovering automotive industry and limited deployment of digital menu boards for quick serve
restaurants. In 2009, we recognized $0.7 million of revenue from Chrysler and BBDO
(Detroit/Windsor), which was then an advertising agent for Chrysler, and $0.5 million from
YUM!/KFC, compared to $2.3 million and $1.3 million for the prior year, respectively. Partially
offsetting this decline was an increase in our sales to ARAMARK, which totaled $1.1 million in 2009
compared to $0.4 million in 2008. Our hardware sales in 2009 of $1.9 million were lower than our
2008 hardware sales of $2.5 million as a result of certain customers choosing to contract directly
with display and media-player suppliers. Excluding the resale of a 2008 software order we received
from Dimensional Innovations, a non-core customer, totaling $0.3 million, sales of our proprietary
RoninCast® software in 2009 were up 24% or $0.1 million when compared to the prior year. Our
decline in services revenue in 2009 when compared to 2008 was primarily the result of a decline in
revenue generated from Chrysler LLC and BBDO, as mentioned above. Revenue generated outside of the
U.S. and Canada increased $0.5 million in 2009 when compared to the prior year as a result of an
increase in sales to Thomson Reuters.
Cost of Sales
Our cost of sales declined 46% to $3.6 million in 2009 from $6.6 million in 2008. The
decrease in cost of sales was due to the year-over-year decreases in hardware and services revenues
of $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and also a reduction in compensation related
employees costs due to the workforce reductions taken in
37
Table of Contents
the fourth quarter of 2008 to better match
our infrastructure and expenses with sales levels and current client projects.
Operating Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses declined 37% to $2.5 million in 2009 from $4.0 million in 2008.
The reduction in sales and marketing expenses related to a decrease in compensation and benefits,
along with lower travel-related expenses, as a result of the workforce reductions taken in the
fourth quarter of 2008. In addition, we reduced the level of spending related to tradeshows and
other marketing initiatives in 2009 compared to the prior year period. Compensation and benefits,
including stock compensation expense totaled $1.8 million for 2009, compared to $2.4 million for
the prior year. Travel expenses were $0.2 million for 2009, compared to $0.5 million for the prior
year. Tradeshows and other marketing initiatives during 2009 totaled $0.5 million, compared to
$1.1 million during the prior year.
Research and development expenses for 2009 declined 15% to $2.2 million from $2.5 million in
2008. The decline was primarily the result of lower compensation and benefits expenses.
General and administrative expenses for 2009 decreased 45% to $6.2 million from $11.3 million
in 2008. The decline was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation and benefits, along
with reduced contractor costs as a result of the workforce reductions taken in the fourth quarter
of 2008, along with other staff reductions taken primarily during the first half of 2009, partially
offset by payment of severance benefits. To streamline our operations and adjust our expenses to
reflect the declining revenues, the company made further organizational changes during 2009 through
a reduction and temporary layoffs of our workforce, both in the U.S. and Canada. Total
compensation to employees and contractors, including benefits and stock compensation expense
totaled $3.8 million in 2009 compared to $6.3 million for the same period in the prior year. In
addition to the reduction attributable to the workforce reductions taken in 2008, our stock
compensation expense decreased $0.6 million in 2009 when compared to the prior year period.
Professional fees paid to outside legal and accounting firms also decreased in 2009 when compared
to 2008. Our fees paid to outside consultants in 2009 totaled $0.6 million compared to $2.4
million for the prior year. The remaining decreases were due to an across-the-board reduction in
almost all expense categories as a result of better aligning our expenses with the lower levels of
revenue.
For fiscal year 2008, we recorded $0.7 million of severance expense in general and
administrative expense related to our June 2008 separation with our former Chief Financial Officer
and our September 2008 separation with our former Chief Executive Officer. For fiscal 2009, we
recorded $0.4 million of severance expense in general and administrative expense related to our
March 2009 separation with our former Executive Vice President, Content Engineering and President,
RNIN Canada and our April 2009 separation with our former Vice President, Controller and Interim
Chief Financial Officer.
In November and December 2008, we announced workforce reductions of 35 and 27 people,
respectively, including both employees and contractors at both our U.S. and Canadian operations.
Coupled with three other U.S. employee resignations prior to the December 2008 reduction in force,
these actions resulted in an approximate 40% total headcount reduction during the fourth quarter of
2008. These two workforce reductions were intended to align our expense base with the current
level of sales and projects, and improve the overall efficiency of the organization. The combined
severance charge from the two workforce reductions totaled approximately $0.3 million. Of such
charge, $0.1 million related to general and administrative expense and $0.2 million was related to
research and development expense.
Depreciation and amortization decreased 37% to $0.8 million in 2009, from $1.2 million in
2008. The decrease in 2009 was primarily the result of recording an impairment charge during the
fourth quarter of 2008 for the remaining value of our acquisition-related intangible assets.
Impairment of Network Equipment Held for Sale. In the third quarter of 2008, we re-classified
a net receivable balance of $1.9 million to network equipment held for sale when NewSight
Corporation defaulted on its note payable obligation and we took ownership of collateral including
in-box inventory and an installed digital signage network in 102 Meijer stores. At the time of
re-classification, Meijer, a grocery store chain in the Midwest,
38
Table of Contents
was seeking a new network owner
and we intended to sell the network to the new owner. Subsequent to December 31, 2008, Meijer
abandoned plans to maintain the network. As a result, we moved approximately $0.2 million of
equipment from the in-box collateral base into inventory and recorded an impairment loss in the
fourth quarter of 2008 on the remaining $1.8 million of network equipment held for sale.
Impairment of Intangible Assets. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded an impairment
charge for the assets related to the 2007 acquisition of McGill Digital Solutions. We reviewed the
carrying value of all long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives, for
impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-05-4. Under ASC 360-10-05-4, impairment losses are
recorded whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may
not be recoverable. We tested the intangible assets acquired in the 2007 acquisition for
impairment in the fourth quarter of 2008 and determined that the underlying assumptions and
economic conditions surrounding the initial valuation of these assets had significantly changed and
an impairment loss was recorded for the total $1.3 million of net book value of these intangible
assets.
Termination of Partnership Agreement. In February 2007, we terminated the strategic
partnership agreement with The Marshall Special Assets Group, Inc. (Marshall) which we had
entered into in May 2004. Pursuant to the terms of a mutual termination, release and agreement, we
paid Marshall $0.7 million and we agreed to pay a fee in connection with sales of our software and
hardware to customers, distributors and resellers for use exclusively in the ultimate operations of
or for use in a lottery (End Users). Under such agreement, we agreed to pay Marshall (i) 30% of
the net invoice price for the sale of our software to End Users, and (ii) 2% of the net invoice
price for the sale of hardware to End Users, in each case collected by us on or before February 12,
2012, with a minimum annual payment of $50,000 for three years. Marshall agreed to pay 50% of the
costs and expenses incurred by us in relation to any test installations involving sales or
prospective sales to End Users. We recorded an expense of $50,000 in each of 2007, 2008, 2009 and
owed no minimum payment in 2010.
Interest Expense
In 2009 and 2008, interest expense of approximately $6,000 and $22,000, respectively, was
attributable to capital lease obligations. The decrease from 2008 to 2009 in interest expense was
the result of lower capital lease balances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2010, we had $7.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, and working capital
of $7.5 million. As of December 31, 2010, we did not have any debt. We plan to use our available
cash to fund operations, including the continued development of our products and attraction of new
customers through sales and marketing initiatives.
In March 2010, we entered into a loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank. The
agreement provides us with a revolving line-of-credit up to $2.5 million at an interest rate of
prime plus 1.5%. Our ability to request an advance on this line-of-credit is based on a percentage
of eligible accounts receivable and inventory balances. Additionally, we are required to maintain
a certain minimum tangible net worth level at either the time of an advancement or while there is
an outstanding balance owed to Silicon Valley Bank. Our failure to meet or maintain the minimum
tangible net worth requirement will also restrict our ability to borrow additional sums under this
agreement. In January 2011, we entered into an amendment which modified the original expiration
date to March 2012 and reduced the minimum tangible net worth requirement to $5.5 million, which
must be maintained at either the time of an advance or while there is an outstanding balance owed
to Silicon Valley Bank. We are not required to maintain the financial requirements while there are
no outstanding advances. See Subsequent Events Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements
regarding the amendment to the terms and conditions of our loan and security agreement with Silicon
Valley Bank.
Based on our current expense levels, we anticipate that our cash will be adequate to fund our
operations through 2011.
39
Table of Contents
Operating Activities
We do not currently generate positive cash flow. Our investments in infrastructure have been
greater than sales generated to date. As of December 31, 2010, we had an accumulated deficit of
$82.3 million. The cash flow used in operating activities was $7.1 million, $8.2 million and $14.9
million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. In 2010, net cash used by operating
activities was attributable to our net loss and an increase in accounts receivables, inventory,
prepaid expenses and other current assets. The increases in accounts receivable and inventory were
the result of our sales being $1.4 million higher during the fourth quarter of 2010 when compared
to the same period in the prior year The days sales outstanding were 78 and 64 at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash used in operating activities in 2010 was partially offset by an
increase in accounts payable, deferred revenue and accrued liabilities. Again, the increases in
accounts payable and deferred revenue were attributable to the overall increase in sales during the
fourth quarter of 2010 when compared to the prior year. The increase in accrued liabilities
included higher commissions payable and other employee-related accruals in 2010 when compared to
the same balances in the prior year.
In 2009, net cash used by operating activities was attributable to our net loss and a
reduction in our accounts payable and accrued liabilities accounts. These amounts were partially
offset by cash provided by an overall reduction in our asset accounts and a higher balance of
deferred revenue in 2009 when compared to the same balances in the prior year. During 2009, we
paid $0.6 million of severance-related costs, which was included in our year-end accrued
liabilities account at the end of 2008. Our deferred revenue balance was higher at the end of
2009 compared to the same balance in 2008 as a result of us being unable to deliver and recognize
revenue of $0.5 million related to a software development order received in December 2009. Our
accounts receivable balance at the end of 2009 was lower when compared to the year-end balance of
2008 as a result of a higher percentage of sales in the fourth quarter of 2009 being billed and
collected before year-end compared to the same period in the prior year. We also recognized
approximately $0.4 million less revenue in the fourth quarter of 2009 when compared to the same
period in the prior year. Our inventory balance at the end of 2009 was lower when compared to the
year-end balance of 2008 as a result of certain customers deciding to source displays and
media-players directly from third-party suppliers, as well as overall better inventory management.
In 2008, net cash used by operating activities was attributable to our net loss, increases in
accounts receivable and prepaid expenses and decreases in accounts payable and deferred revenue,
partially offset by decreases in inventory and corporate taxes receivable and increases in accrued
liabilities.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $8.2 million and $5.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008. In 2010, net cash used in investing activities was attributable to the
purchase of property and equipment. In 2009 and 2008, net cash provided by investing activities
was primarily the result of net sales of marketable securities of $8.3 million and $6.4 million,
respectively. During 2009, we invested substantially all of our cash into a commercial sweep
account, as the investment interest rate was higher than interest rates of other high-grade
short-term investments. The net sales of marketable securities in 2009 and 2008 were partially
offset by purchases of property and equipment of $0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. We
significantly scaled back our level of capital investments in 2009 compared to 2008 as a result of
the continued cost reduction effort started in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Financing Activities
We have financed our operations primarily through sales of common stock and the issuance of
notes payable to vendors, shareholders and investors. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008, we generated a net $2.2 million, $7.1 million and $0.5 million from financing activities,
respectively.
In November 2010, we sold approximately 1.4 million shares of our common stock at $1.25 per
share and issued warrants to purchase up to 285,000 shares of our common stock at $1.4375 per share
pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 which was declared effective by the SEC in
September 2009. We obtained approximately $1.6 million in net proceeds as a result of this
registered direct offering. During 2010, we received
40
Table of Contents
$30,000 from the sale of approximately 28,000 shares of common stock to our associates
(employees) through our 2007 Associate Stock Purchase Plan and we received approximately $0.2
million from the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants. Our restricted cash balance
was reduced by $0.3 million in 2010 related to the cancelation of a letter of credit which was
collateralized by an equal amount of cash held at the issuing bank. We used $11,000 for the
payment of capital leases during 2010.
In November 2009, we sold approximately 2.6 million shares of our common stock at $2.90 per
share pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 which was declared effective by the SEC in
September 2009. We obtained approximately $6.9 million in net proceeds as a result of this
registered direct offering. During 2009, we received $0.1 million from the sale of approximately
83,000 shares of common stock to our associates through our 2007 Associate Stock Purchase Plan and
we received approximately $0.1 million from the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants.
Our restricted cash balance was reduced by $0.1 million in 2009 related to the above referenced
letter of credit. We used $0.1 million in the payment of capital leases during 2009.
During 2008, we received $0.2 million from the sale of approximately 143,000 shares of common
stock to our associates through our 2007 Associate Stock Purchase Plan and we received $0.4 million
from the exercise of outstanding warrants. We used approximately $0.1 million in the payment of
capital leases during 2008.
Disruptions in the economy and constraints in the credit markets have caused companies to
reduce or delay capital investment. Some of our prospective customers may cancel or delay spending
on the development or roll-out of capital and technology projects with us due to continuing
economic uncertainty. Difficult economic conditions have adversely affected certain industries in
particular, including the automotive and restaurant industries, in which we have major customers.
We could also experience lower than anticipated order levels from current customers, cancellations
of existing but unfulfilled orders, and extended payment or delivery terms. Economic conditions
could also materially impact us through insolvency of our suppliers or current customers. While we
have down-sized our operations to reflect the decrease in demand, we may not be successful in
mirroring current demand. If customer demand were to decline further, we might be unable to adjust
expense levels rapidly enough in response to falling demand or without changing the way in which we
operate. If revenue were to decrease further and we are unable to adequately reduce expense
levels, we might incur significant losses that could adversely affect our overall financial
performance and the market price of our common stock.
As of December 31, 2010, Chrysler accounted for 48% of our total receivables. In April 2009,
Chrysler and twenty-four of its affiliated subsidiaries filed a consolidated petition for Chapter
11 Bankruptcy Protection with the U.S. Federal Bankruptcy court in New York City. While Chrysler
has emerged from bankruptcy and we continue to receive orders, our revenues were significantly
impacted in 2009 compared to the prior year (see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
regarding Segment Information and Major Customers.) In addition, Chryslers former advertising
agency, BBDO Detroit, the entity responsible for purchasing our products and services on Chryslers
behalf, closed its office at the end of January 2010. Chrysler has subsequently moved its
advertising relationship to another firm, which is not currently a customer of ours. During 2010,
we received all purchase orders directly from Chrysler, which included orders that traditionally
would have been issued through BBDO Detroit. Although we believe Chryslers decision to change its
advertising agency did not affect any of our current projects, we are unable to provide assurance
that future opportunities will not be impacted. In the case of insolvency by one of our
significant customers, an account receivable with respect to that customer might not be
collectible, might not be fully collectible, or might be collectible over longer than normal terms,
each of which could adversely affect our financial position.
Based on our current and anticipated expense levels and our existing capital resources, we
anticipate that our cash will be adequate to fund our operations through 2011. Our future capital
requirements, however, will depend on many factors, including our ability to successfully market
and sell our products and services, develop new products and services and establish and leverage
our strategic partnerships and business alliance relationships. In order to meet our needs should
we not become cash flow positive or should we be unable to sustain positive cash flow, we may be
required to raise additional funding through public or private financings, including equity
financings. Any additional equity financings may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing,
if available, would likely involve restrictive covenants. Adequate funds for our operations,
whether from financial markets, collaborative or other arrangements, may not be available when
needed or on terms attractive to us, especially with credit markets which continue to be risk
adverse. If adequate funds are not available, our plans to expand our
41
Table of Contents
business may be adversely affected and we could be required to curtail our activities
significantly. Necessary funding may not be available on terms that are favorable to the company,
if at all.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
It is not our business practice to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
Although we have no material commitments for capital expenditures, we anticipate continued
capital expenditures consistent with our anticipated growth in operations, infrastructure and
personnel. Unless we experience a significant increase to our revenues, we expect our 2011
operating expenses will remain at levels similar to 2010 as we continue to control expenses in the
current economic environment.
Operating and Capital Leases
At December 31, 2010, our principal commitments consisted of long-term obligations under
operating leases. We conduct our U.S. operations from a leased facility located at 5929 Baker Road
in Minnetonka, Minnesota. We lease approximately 19,000 square feet of office and warehouse space
under a lease that extends through January 31, 2018. In addition, we lease office space of
approximately 10,000 square feet to support our Canadian operations at a facility located at 4510
Rhodes Drive, Suite 800, Windsor, Ontario, Canada under a lease, as amended, that extends through
June 30, 2014. We have a one-time option under this lease to cancel the lease on June 30, 2012 for
a fee of approximately $39,000. The following table summarizes our obligations under contractual
agreements as of December 31, 2010, assuming we do not cancel our Canada lease early, and the time
frame within which payments on such obligations are due (in thousands):
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than | More Than | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Operating Lease Obligations |
$ | 1,548 | $ | 242 | $ | 488 | $ | 414 | $ | 404 | ||||||||||
Capital Lease Obligations |
90 | 46 | 44 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,638 | $ | 288 | $ | 532 | $ | 414 | $ | 404 | ||||||||||
Our internal source of liquidity solely consists of our cash balance, which as of
December 31, 2010 was $7.1 million. Of this amount, $6.8 million is invested in a daily sweep
commercial paper account with Silicon Valley Bank. We continuously monitor the credit rating of
this financial institution and have determined there is a low level of risk of the funds not
settling on a daily basis. Additionally, we have no limits or restrictions on our ability to use
or access these funds for operating our business. Our external sources of liquidity include a $2.5
million line-of-credit we have in place with Silicon Valley Bank.
Based on our working capital position at December 31, 2010, we believe we have sufficient
working capital to meet our current obligations for at least the next 12 months.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 860-10-05-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets. FASB ASC 860-10-05-3 amends the guidance on transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions where entities have continued exposure to risks related to transferred
financial assets. ASC 860-10-05-3 also expands the disclosure requirements for such transactions.
This statement became effective for our fiscal year 2010. The adoption did not have a material
impact on our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810-10-05-8, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities. This statement became effective for our fiscal year 2010. The adoption did not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
42
Table of Contents
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue recognition that will
become effective for us beginning January 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted. Under the new
guidance on arrangements that include software elements, tangible products that have software
components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product will no longer be within
the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software enabled products will instead
be subject to the other relevant revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, the FASB issued
authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the
scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor-specific
objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined,
a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement
consideration using the relative selling price method. The new guidance includes new disclosure
requirements on how the application of the relative selling method affects the timing and amount of
revenue recognition. We believe the adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact
on our financial statements.
Subsequent Events
In January 2011, we entered into a First Loan Modification Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank
pursuant to which the maturity date of our existing revolving line of credit was extended from
March 2011 to March 2012. The revolving line of credit provides us with credit up to $2.5 million
at an interest rate of prime plus 1.5%. The amount of credit available to us at any given time is
the lesser of (a) $2.5 million, or (b) the amount available under our borrowing base (75% of our
eligible accounts receivable plus 50% of our eligible inventory) minus (1) the dollar equivalent
amount of all outstanding letters of credit, (2) 10% of each outstanding foreign exchange contract,
(3) any amounts used for cash management services, and (4) the outstanding principal balance of any
advances. Under the First Loan Modification Agreement, we must maintain a minimum tangible net
worth of at least $5.5 million. This tangible net worth minimum increases (a) quarterly by 75% of
our net income for each fiscal quarter then ended and (b) by 75% of the proceeds from future
issuances of equity and/or the principal amount of subordinated debt. We must comply with this
tangible net worth minimum while there are outstanding credit extensions (other than our existing
lease letter of credit).
In addition, in connection with our entry into the First Loan Modification Agreement, we
entered into an Amendment to Warrant Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank pursuant to which the
exercise price of the above-referenced warrant was reduced to $1.378 per share. The reduced
exercise price represents the five-day average closing price per share of the our common stock for
the period immediately preceding our entry into the First Loan Modification Agreement.
ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and accounts receivables. We
maintain our accounts for cash and cash equivalents principally at one major bank. As of December
31, 2010, our cash was primarily invested in a commercial paper sweep account as the interest rate
yield was more favorable than those of United States government securities and money market funds.
We have not experienced any significant losses on our deposits of our cash, cash equivalents, or
marketable securities.
We do not believe our operations are currently subject to significant market risks for
interest rates or other relevant market price risks of a material nature.
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our consolidated financial position as
well as our consolidated results of operations. Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may adversely
impact our financial position as the assets and liabilities of our Canadian operations are
translated into U.S. dollars in preparing our consolidated
balance sheet. These gains or losses are recognized as an adjustment to shareholders equity
through accumulated other comprehensive loss.
ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on Page F-1.
43
Table of Contents
ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on this
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
December 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Managements Annual Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f), is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and
principal financial officers and effected by our board of directors, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
| Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; | ||
| Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and | ||
| Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control
systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation and presentation.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that as of December 31,
2010, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the companys registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by the
44
Table of Contents
companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission that permit the company to provide only managements report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended December 31, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We incorporate by reference the information contained under the captions Proposal 1
Election of Directors, Our Board of Directors and Committees and Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance in our definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held June 9, 2011.
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K and Instruction 3 to
Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, information regarding our executive officers is provided in Part I
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under separate caption.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all of our
employees, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions) and
directors. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics satisfies the requirements of Item 406(b) of
Regulation S-K and applicable NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is
posted on our internet website at www.wirelessronin.com and is available, free of charge, upon
written request to our Chief Financial Officer at 5929 Baker Road, Suite 475, Minnetonka, MN 55345.
We intend to disclose any amendment to or waiver from a provision of our Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics that requires disclosure on our website at www.wirelessronin.com.
ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We incorporate by reference the information contained under the captions Non-Employee
Director Compensation and Executive Compensation in our definitive proxy statement for the
annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 9, 2011.
ITEM
12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
We incorporate by reference the information contained under the caption Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Equity Compensation Plan Information in our
definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 9, 2011.
ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
We incorporate by reference the information contained under the captions Our Board of
Directors and Committees and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in our definitive
proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 9, 2011.
45
Table of Contents
ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
We incorporate by reference the information contained under the caption Proposal 7
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in our definitive
proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held June 9, 2011.
PART IV
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 and Exhibit
Index on page E-1.
(b) See Exhibit Index on page E-1.
(c) Not applicable.
46
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Minnetonka, State of Minnesota, on March 22, 2011.
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. |
||||
By | /s/ Scott W. Koller | |||
Scott W. Koller | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant, and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Scott W. Koller
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
March 22, 2011 | ||
/s/ Darin P. McAreavey
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
March 22, 2011 | ||
/s/ Stephen F. Birke
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors | March 22, 2011 | ||
/s/ Gregory T. Barnum
|
Director | March 22, 2011 | ||
/s/ Thomas J. Moudry
|
Director | March 22, 2011 | ||
/s/ Geoffrey J. Obeney
|
Director | March 22, 2011 | ||
/s/ William F. Schnell
|
Director | March 22, 2011 | ||
/s/ Brett A. Shockley
|
Director | March 22, 2011 |
47
Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc.
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 |
F-1
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders, Audit Committee and Board of Directors
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc.
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc.
Minnetonka, Minnesota
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc.
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the
overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. as of December 31,
2010 and 2009 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 22, 2011
March 22, 2011
F-2
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 7,064 | $ | 12,273 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of
$35 and $51 |
2,522 | 1,096 | ||||||
Inventories |
272 | 185 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets |
275 | 151 | ||||||
Total current assets |
10,133 | 13,705 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,019 | 1,242 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
50 | 380 | ||||||
Other assets |
40 | 20 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 11,242 | $ | 15,347 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Current maturities of capital lease
obligations |
$ | 37 | $ | | ||||
Accounts payable |
1,563 | 976 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
488 | 362 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
571 | 251 | ||||||
Total current
liabilities |
2,659 | 1,589 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations,
less current maturities |
40 | | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
2,699 | 1,589 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Capital stock, $0.01 par value, 66,667 shares authorized
Preferred stock, 16,667 shares authorized, no shares
issued
and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, 50,000 shares authorized; 19,233 and
17,614 shares
issued and
outstanding |
192 | 176 | ||||||
Additional paid-in
capital |
91,138 | 88,371 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(82,278 | ) | (74,395 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
(509 | ) | (394 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders
equity |
8,543 | 13,758 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 11,242 | $ | 15,347 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Sales |
||||||||||||
Hardware |
$ | 3,195 | $ | 1,878 | $ | 2,479 | ||||||
Software |
1,394 | 710 | 876 | |||||||||
Services and other |
3,978 | 2,421 | 4,026 | |||||||||
Total sales |
8,567 | 5,009 | 7,381 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
||||||||||||
Hardware |
2,113 | 1,504 | 2,193 | |||||||||
Software |
109 | 21 | 247 | |||||||||
Services and other |
2,312 | 2,018 | 4,084 | |||||||||
Inventory lower of cost or market adjustment |
48 | 43 | 65 | |||||||||
Total cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
4,582 | 3,586 | 6,589 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
3,985 | 1,423 | 792 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Sales and marketing expenses |
2,329 | 2,520 | 3,999 | |||||||||
Research and development expenses |
2,864 | 2,167 | 2,541 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
5,963 | 6,168 | 11,258 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
684 | 771 | 1,226 | |||||||||
Impairment of network equipment held for sale |
| | 1,766 | |||||||||
Impairment of intangible assets |
| | 1,265 | |||||||||
Termination of partnership agreement |
| 50 | 50 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
11,840 | 11,676 | 22,105 | |||||||||
Operating loss |
(7,855 | ) | (10,253 | ) | (21,313 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(58 | ) | (6 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||
Interest income |
30 | 76 | 647 | |||||||||
Other |
| | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(28 | ) | 70 | 621 | ||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (7,883 | ) | $ | (10,183 | ) | $ | (20,692 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted loss per common share |
$ | (0.44 | ) | $ | (0.67 | ) | $ | (1.41 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
17,901 | 15,274 | 14,664 | |||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income (loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 |
14,538 | $ | 145 | $ | 78,742 | $ | (43,520 | ) | $ | 321 | $ | 35,688 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (20,692 | ) | | (20,692 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on investments |
| | | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation loss |
| | | | (733 | ) | (733 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(21,426 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 1,313 | | | 1,313 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock issued under equity incentive plan |
6 | 1 | | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of options and warrants |
163 | 1 | 371 | | | 372 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under associate stock purchase plan |
143 | 1 | 224 | | | 225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2008 |
14,850 | 148 | 80,650 | (64,212 | ) | (413 | ) | 16,173 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (10,183 | ) | | (10,183 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation gain |
| | | | 19 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(10,164 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 698 | | | 698 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted and common stock issued under equity incentive plan |
30 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of options and warrants |
36 | 1 | 60 | | | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under associate stock purchase plan |
83 | 1 | 86 | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, less offering costs |
2,615 | 26 | 6,877 | | | 6,903 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2009 |
17,614 | 176 | 88,371 | (74,395 | ) | (394 | ) | 13,758 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (7,883 | ) | | (7,883 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation loss |
| | | | (115 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(7,998 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 868 | | | 868 | ||||||||||||||||||
Warrants issued for debt issuance costs |
| | 66 | | | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted and common stock issued under equity incentive plan |
91 | 1 | | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards |
(11 | ) | | (25 | ) | | | (25 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of options and warrants |
86 | 1 | 233 | | | 234 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under associate stock purchase plan |
28 | | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, less offering costs |
1,425 | 14 | 1,595 | | | 1,609 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2010 |
19,233 | $ | 192 | $ | 91,138 | $ | (82,278 | ) | $ | (509 | ) | $ | 8,543 | |||||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (7,883 | ) | $ | (10,183 | ) | $ | (20,692 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
684 | 771 | 702 | |||||||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
| | 524 | |||||||||
Impairment of intangible assets |
| | 1,265 | |||||||||
Impairment of network equipment held for sale |
| | 1,766 | |||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
13 | 53 | 73 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
868 | 698 | 1,313 | |||||||||
Amortization of warrants issued for debt issuance costs |
50 | | | |||||||||
Forfeiture of common stock for payroll taxes |
(25 | ) | | | ||||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful receivables |
9 | (41 | ) | 7 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(1,435 | ) | 828 | (173 | ) | |||||||
Corporate income taxes |
| 14 | 189 | |||||||||
Inventories |
(87 | ) | 275 | 182 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(112 | ) | 72 | (63 | ) | |||||||
Other assets |
(20 | ) | 18 | 1 | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
584 | (107 | ) | (272 | ) | |||||||
Deferred revenue |
127 | 180 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
128 | (825 | ) | 274 | ||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(7,099 | ) | (8,247 | ) | (14,910 | ) | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(189 | ) | (133 | ) | (1,051 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of marketable securities |
| (22 | ) | (28,662 | ) | |||||||
Sales of marketable securities |
| 8,323 | 35,018 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities |
(189 | ) | 8,168 | 5,305 | ||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||
Payments on long-term notes payable and capital leases |
(11 | ) | (71 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||||
Restricted cash |
330 | 70 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants |
1,609 | 6,903 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and stock options |
234 | 61 | 372 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock under associate stock purchase plan |
30 | 87 | 225 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activites |
2,192 | 7,050 | 498 | |||||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
(113 | ) | 8 | (141 | ) | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(5,209 | ) | 6,979 | (9,248 | ) | |||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year |
12,273 | 5,294 | 14,542 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year |
$ | 7,064 | $ | 12,273 | $ | 5,294 | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1: NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business and Operations
Overview
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. (the Company) is a Minnesota corporation that provides
dynamic digital signage solutions targeting specific retail and service markets. The Company has
designed and developed RoninCast®, a proprietary content delivery system that manages, schedules
and delivers digital content over a wireless or wired network. The solutions, the digital
alternative to static signage, provide business customers with a dynamic and interactive visual
marketing system designed to enhance the way they advertise, market and deliver their messages to
targeted audiences.
The Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, Wireless Ronin Technologies (Canada), Inc., an Ontario,
Canada provincial corporation located in Windsor, Ontario, develops e-learning, e-performance
support and e-marketing solutions for business customers. E-learning solutions are software-based
instructional systems developed specifically for customers, primarily in sales force training
applications. E-performance support systems are interactive systems produced to increase product
literacy of customer sales staff. E-marketing products are developed to increase customer knowledge
of and interaction with customer products.
The Company and its subsidiary sell products and services primarily throughout North America.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of
the accompanying financial statements follows:
1. Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Wireless Ronin Technologies,
Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary. All inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
2. Foreign Currency
Foreign denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange
prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange
rates prevailing during the reporting period. The Companys Canadian subsidiarys functional
currency is the Canadian dollar. Translation adjustments result from translating the subsidiarys
financial statements into the Companys reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. The translation
adjustment has not been included in determining the Companys net loss, but has been reported
separately and is accumulated in a separate component of equity. The Canadian subsidiary has
foreign currency transactions denominated in a currency other than the Canadian dollar. These
transactions include receivables and payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign
currency that will be received or paid on a future date. A change in exchange rates between the
functional currency and the currency in which the transaction is denominated increases or decreases
the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That
increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction
gain or loss that has been included in determining the net loss of the period. In 2010, 2009 and
2008, a foreign currency transaction gain of $104, $1 and $214 was recorded in Sales, respectively.
F-7
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
3. Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue primarily from these sources:
| Software and software license sales |
| System hardware sales |
| Professional service revenue |
| Software design and development services |
| Implementation services |
| Maintenance and hosting support contracts |
The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 605-985,
Revenue Recognition: Software (or ASC 605-35) to all transactions involving the sale of software
licenses. In the event of a multiple element arrangement, the Company evaluates if each element
represents a separate unit of accounting, taking into account all factors following the guidelines
set forth in FASB ASC 605-985-25-5.
The Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii)
delivery has occurred, which is when product title transfers to the customer, or services have been
rendered; (iii) customer payment is deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies and
significant uncertainties; and (iv) collection is probable. The Company assesses collectability
based on a number of factors, including the customers past payment history and its current
creditworthiness. If it is determined that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, the
Company defers the revenue and recognizes it at the time collection becomes reasonably assured,
which is generally upon receipt of cash payment. If an acceptance period is required, revenue is
recognized upon the earlier of customer acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period.
Multiple-Element Arrangements The Company enters into arrangements with customers that
include a combination of software products, system hardware, maintenance and support, or
installation and training services. The Company allocates the total arrangement fee among the
various elements of the arrangement based on the relative fair value of each of the undelivered
elements determined by vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE). In software arrangements for
which the Company does not have VSOE of fair value for all elements, revenue is deferred until the
earlier of when VSOE is determined for the undelivered elements (residual method) or when all
elements for which the Company does not have VSOE of fair value have been delivered. The Company
has determined VSOE of fair value for each of its products and services.
The VSOE for maintenance and support services is based upon the renewal rate for continued
service arrangements. The VSOE for installation and training services is established based upon
pricing for the services. The VSOE for software and licenses is based on the normal pricing and
discounting for the product when sold separately.
Each element of the Companys multiple element arrangements qualifies for separate accounting.
However, when a sale includes both software and maintenance, the Company defers revenue under the
residual method of accounting. Under this method, the undelivered maintenance and support fees
included in the price of software is amortized ratably over the period the services are provided.
The Company defers maintenance and support fees based upon the customers renewal rate for these
services.
F-8
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Software and software license sales
The Company recognizes revenue when a fixed fee order has been received and delivery has
occurred to the customer. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed or determinable and free of
contingencies based upon signed agreements received from the customer confirming terms of the
transaction. Software is delivered to customers electronically or on a CD-ROM, and license files
are delivered electronically.
System hardware sales
The Company recognizes revenue on system hardware sales generally upon shipment of the product
or customer acceptance depending upon contractual arrangements with the customer. Shipping charges
billed to customers are included in sales and the related shipping costs are included in cost of
sales.
Professional service revenue
Included in services and other revenues is revenue derived from implementation, maintenance
and support contracts, content development, software development and training. The majority of
consulting and implementation services and accompanying agreements qualify for separate accounting.
Implementation and content development services are bid either on a fixed-fee basis or on a
time-and-materials basis. For time-and-materials contracts, the Company recognizes revenue as
services are performed. For fixed-fee contracts, the Company recognizes revenue upon completion of
specific contractual milestones or by using the percentage-of-completion method.
Software design and development services
Revenue from contracts for technology integration consulting services where the Company
designs/redesigns, builds and implements new or enhanced systems applications and related processes
for clients are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with FASB ASC
605-985-25-88 through 107. Percentage-of-completion accounting involves calculating the
percentage of services provided during the reporting period compared to the total estimated
services to be provided over the duration of the contract. Estimated revenues from applying the
percentage-of-completion method include estimated incentives for which achievement of defined goals
is deemed probable. This method is followed where reasonably dependable estimates of revenues and
costs can be made. The Company measures its progress for completion based on either the hours
worked as a percentage of the total number of hours of the project or by delivery and customer
acceptance of specific milestones as outlined per the terms of the agreement with the customer.
Estimates of total contract revenue and costs are continuously monitored during the term of the
contract, and recorded revenue and costs are subject to revision as the contract progresses. Such
revisions may result in increases or decreases to revenue and income and are reflected in the
financial statements in the periods in which they are first identified. If estimates indicate that
a contract loss will occur, a loss provision is recorded in the period in which the loss first
becomes probable and reasonably estimable. Contract losses are determined to be the amount by which
the estimated direct and indirect costs of the contract exceed the estimated total revenue that
will be generated by the contract and are included in cost of sales and classified in accrued
expenses in the balance sheet. The Companys presentation of revenue recognized on a contract
completion basis has been consistently applied for all periods presented.
F-9
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company classifies the revenue and associated cost on the Services and Other line within
the Sales and Cost of Sales sections of the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In all cases
where the Company applies the contract method of accounting, the Companys only deliverable is
professional services, thus, the Company believes presenting the revenue on a single line is
appropriate.
Costs and estimated earnings recognized in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts are
recorded as unbilled services and are included in accounts receivable on the balance sheet.
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts are recorded as
deferred revenue until revenue recognition criteria are met.
Uncompleted contracts at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cost incurred on uncompleted contracts |
$ | 80 | $ | 205 | ||||
Estimated earnings |
179 | 226 | ||||||
Revenue recognized |
259 | 431 | ||||||
Less: billings to date |
(182 | ) | (532 | ) | ||||
$ | 77 | $ | (101 | ) | ||||
The above information in presented in the balance sheet as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
$ | 109 | $ | 74 | ||||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
(32 | ) | (175 | ) | ||||
$ | 77 | $ | (101 | ) | ||||
Implementation services
Implementation services revenue is recognized when installation is completed.
Maintenance and hosting support contracts
Maintenance and hosting support consists of software updates and support. Software updates
provide customers with rights to unspecified software product upgrades and maintenance releases and
patches released during the term of the support period. Support includes access to technical
support personnel for software and hardware issues. The Company also offers a hosting service
through its network operations center, or NOC, allowing the ability to monitor and support its
customers networks 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.
Maintenance and hosting support revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance
contract, which is typically one to three years. Maintenance and support is renewable by the
customer. Rates for maintenance and support, including subsequent renewal rates, are typically
established based upon a specified percentage of net license fees as set forth in the arrangement.
The Companys hosting support agreement fees are
based on the level of service provided to its customers, which can range from monitoring the
health of a customers network to supporting a sophisticated web-portal.
F-10
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of commercial paper and all other liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less when purchased. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had
substantially all cash invested in a commercial paper sweep account. The Company maintains the
majority of its cash balances in one financial institution located in Chicago. The balance is
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250.
5. Restricted Cash
In connection with the Companys banks credit card program, the Company is required to
maintain a cash balance of $50 and $380, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
reduction in restricted cash was the result of the Company obtaining a letter of credit for its
current lease from Silicon Valley Bank which did not require a cash deposit to be maintained by the
Company.
6. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are usually unsecured and stated at net realizable value and bad debts are
accounted for using the allowance method. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers
financial condition on an as-needed basis and generally requires no collateral. Payment is
generally due 90 days or less from the invoice date and accounts past due more than 90 days are
individually analyzed for collectability. In addition, an allowance is provided for other accounts
when a significant pattern of uncollectability has occurred based on historical experience and
managements evaluation of accounts receivable. If all collection efforts have been exhausted, the
account is written off against the related allowance. No interest is charged on past due accounts.
The allowance for doubtful accounts was $35 and $51 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
7. Inventories
The Company records inventories using the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method. Inventories consist principally of finished goods, product components and software
licenses. Inventory reserves are established to reflect slow-moving or obsolete products. There
were no inventory reserves at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
8. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of all long-lived assets, including property and
equipment as well as intangible assets with definite lives, for impairment in accordance with FASB
ASC 360-10-05-4, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Under FASB ASC
360-10-05-4, impairment losses are recorded whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.
If the impairment tests indicate that the carrying value of the asset is greater than the
expected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by such asset, an impairment loss would be
recognized. The impairment loss is determined by the amount by which the carrying value of such
asset exceeds its fair value. We generally measure fair value by considering sale prices for
similar assets or by discounting estimated future cash flows from such assets using an appropriate
discount rate. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of their carrying value or fair
value less costs to sell. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value
of assets, and accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. There have
been no
impairment losses for long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, recorded in
2010 or 2009. Impairment charges of $1,265 were recorded in 2008 related to the intangible assets
associated with the acquisition of our wholly-owned subsidiary.
F-11
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
9. Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation is provided for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to
operations over the estimated service lives, principally using straight-line methods. Leased
equipment is depreciated over the term of the capital lease. Leasehold improvements are amortized
over the shorter of the life of the improvement or the lease term, using the straight-line method.
The estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation and amortization are as follows:
Equipment |
3 5 years | |||
Demonstration equipment |
3 5 years | |||
Furniture and fixtures |
7 years | |||
Purchased software |
3 years | |||
Leased equipment |
3 years | |||
Leasehold improvements |
Shorter of 5 years or term of lease |
Depreciation and amortization expense (exclusive of amortization of intangible assets) was
$684, $771 and $702 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
10. Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred. Advertising costs were $45, $126
and $286 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
11. Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss includes revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are excluded from net
loss. Items of comprehensive loss are unrealized gains and losses on short-term investments and
foreign currency translation adjustments which are added to net income or loss to compute
comprehensive income or loss. In 2009, comprehensive losses included $19 of unrealized foreign
currency translation gains on the translation of the financial statements of the Companys foreign
subsidiary from its functional currency to the U.S. dollar compared to $115 and $733 of unrealized
foreign currency translation losses in 2010 and 2008. In 2008, comprehensive losses for
unrealized investment losses were immaterial.
12. Research and Development and Software Development Costs
Research and development expenses consist primarily of development personnel and non-employee
contractor costs related to the development of new products and services, enhancement of existing
products and services, quality assurance and testing. FASB ASC 985-20-25, Accounting for the
Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed, requires certain software
development costs to be capitalized upon the establishment of technological feasibility. The
establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing assessment of the recoverability of
these costs require considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors
such as anticipated future revenue, estimated economic life, and changes in software and hardware
technologies. Software development costs incurred beyond the establishment of technological
feasibility have not been significant. No software development costs were capitalized during the
years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Software development costs have been recorded as research
and development expense. The Company incurred research and development expenses of $2,864 in 2010,
$2,167 in 2009 and $2,541 in 2008.
F-12
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
13. Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share
Basic and diluted loss per common share for all periods presented is computed using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Basic weighted average shares outstanding
include only outstanding common shares. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing
net loss by the weighted average common and potential dilutive common shares outstanding computed
in accordance with the treasury stock method. Shares reserved for outstanding stock warrants and
options totaling 3,832, 3,196 and 3,612 for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were excluded from
the computation of loss per share as their effect was antidilutive due to the Companys net loss in
each of those years.
14. Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are recognized in the financial statements for the tax consequences in
future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial
reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates. Temporary differences arise
from net operating losses, reserves for uncollectible accounts receivables and inventory,
differences in depreciation methods, and accrued expenses. Valuation allowances are established
when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
15. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10 which
requires the measurements and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payments
including warrants, stock options, restricted stock grants and stock bonuses based on estimated
fair value. For purposes of determining estimated fair value under FASB ASC 718-10-30, the Company
computes the estimated fair values of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The fair value of restricted stock and stock award grants are determined based on the number of
shares granted and the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
Compensation expense for all share-based payment awards is recognized using the straight-line
amortization method over the vesting period. Stock-based compensation expense of $868, $698 and
$1,313 was charged to expense during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No tax benefit has been
recorded due to the full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets that the Company has recorded.
The Company adopted the guidance of FASB 718-10-S99-1 for purposes of determining the expected
term for stock options. Due to the limited historical data to rely upon, the Company utilized the
Simplified method in developing an estimate of expected term in accordance with FASB ASC
718-10-S99-1 for awards granted prior to January 1, 2010. The Company used historical closing
stock price volatility for a period equal to the period its common stock has been trading publicly.
Due to the limited historical data prior to January 1, 2010, the Company used a weighted average
of other publicly traded stock volatility for the remaining expected term of the options granted
prior to January 1, 2010. From January 2010, the Company calculated the estimated expected life
based upon historical exercise data. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Companys
history and expectation of no future dividend payouts.
Stock-based compensation expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced
for estimated forfeitures. FASB 718-10-55 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of
grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. Prior to January 1, 2010, the Company had little historical experience on which to base
an assumption and used a zero percent forfeiture rate
assumption. Commencing January 1, 2010, the Company applied a pre-vesting forfeiture rate of
18.3 to 19.3% based on upon actual historical experience for all employee option awards. The
Company continues to apply a zero forfeiture rate to those options granted to members of its Board
of Directors.
F-13
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued for services and goods to non-employees
under FASB ASC 505-50-1 Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees
for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services and FASB ASC 505-50-25
Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than
Employees. Generally, the equity instruments issued for services and goods are shares of the
Companys common stock, warrants or options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock.
These shares, warrants or options are either fully-vested and exercisable at the date of grant or
vest over a certain period during which services are provided. The Company expenses the fair
market value of these securities over the period in which the related services are received.
See Note 8 for further information regarding the impact of the Companys adoption of FASB ASC
718-10 and the assumptions used to calculate the fair value of share-based compensation.
16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, requires disclosure of the
estimated fair value of an entitys financial instruments. Such disclosures, which pertain to the
Companys financial instruments, do not purport to represent the aggregate net fair value of the
Company. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The fair value of
capital lease obligations approximates carrying value based on the interest rate in the lease
compared to current market interest rates.
17. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Significant estimates of the Company are the allowance for doubtful accounts, recognition
of revenue under fixed price contracts, deferred tax assets, deferred revenue, depreciable lives
and methods of property and equipment, valuation of warrants and other stock-based compensation and
valuation of recorded intangible assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
18. Deferred Financing Costs
Amortization expense related to deferred financing costs was $50 for the year ended December
31, 2010 and is recorded as a component of interest expense. There was no amortization expense
recorded in 2009 and 2008. The balance of deferred finance costs at December 31, 2010 was $16.
19. Subsequent Events
The Company evaluates events through the date the financial statements are filed for events
requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.
F-14
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 860-10-05-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets. FASB ASC 860-10-05-3 amends the guidance on transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions where entities have continued exposure to risks related to transferred
financial assets. ASC 860-10-05-3 also expands the disclosure requirements for such transactions.
This statement became effective for the Company for fiscal year 2010. The adoption did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810-10-05-8, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities. This statement became effective for the Company for fiscal year 2010. The adoption did
not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue recognition that will
become effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2011, with earlier adoption permitted. Under
the new guidance on arrangements that include software elements, tangible products that have
software components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product will no longer
be within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software enabled products
will instead be subject to the other relevant revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, the FASB
issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside
the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when
vendor-specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement
cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and
allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The new guidance
includes new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling method affects
the timing and amount of revenue recognition. The Company believes adoption of this new guidance
will not have a material impact on its financial statements.
NOTE 2: OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
The following tables provide details of selected financial statement items:
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL RECEIVABLES
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 51 | $ | 92 | ||||
Provision for doubtful receivables |
| | ||||||
Write-offs |
(16 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 35 | $ | 51 | ||||
INVENTORIES
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 188 | $ | 156 | ||||
Work-in-process |
84 | 29 | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 272 | $ | 185 | ||||
F-15
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company has recorded adjustments to reduce inventory values to the lower of cost or market
for certain finished goods, product components and supplies. The Company recorded expense of $48,
$43 and $65 during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to this
adjustment to cost of sales.
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted primarily
of deposits for trade shows and corporate insurance premiums.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Leased equipment |
$ | 411 | $ | 321 | ||||
Equipment |
1,433 | 1,330 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
363 | 155 | ||||||
Demonstration equipment |
155 | 151 | ||||||
Purchased software |
691 | 651 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
571 | 565 | ||||||
Total property and equipment |
$ | 3,624 | $ | 3,173 | ||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(2,605 | ) | (1,931 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment |
$ | 1,019 | $ | 1,242 | ||||
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets consist of long-term deposits on operating leases.
ACCRUED LIABILITIES
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Compensation |
$ | 260 | $ | 146 | ||||
Accrued rent |
252 | 71 | ||||||
Sales tax and other |
59 | 34 | ||||||
Total accrued liabilities |
$ | 571 | $ | 251 | ||||
See Note 5 for additional information on capital lease obligations.
F-16
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
DEFERRED REVENUE
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Deferred software maintenance |
$ | 293 | $ | 75 | ||||
Customer deposits and deferred project revenue |
195 | 287 | ||||||
Total deferred revenue |
$ | 488 | $ | 362 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For the Yeas Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for: |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 3 | $ | 6 | $ | 22 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||||||
Warrants issued for debt issuance costs |
66 | | ||||||||||
Non-cash purchase of property and equipment through capital lease obligations |
89 | | ||||||||||
Non-cash purchase of property and equipment through leasehold improvement allowance |
191 | | | |||||||||
Collateral received for note receivable |
| | 1,937 | |||||||||
NOTE 3: TERMINATION OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
On February 13, 2007, the Company terminated the strategic partnership agreement with The
Marshall Special Assets Group, Inc. (Marshall) which it had entered into in May 2004. Pursuant to
the terms of a mutual termination, release and agreement, the Company paid Marshall $654 and agreed
to pay a fee in connection with sales of its software and hardware to customers, distributors and
resellers for use exclusively in the ultimate operations of or for use in a lottery (End Users).
Under such agreement, the Company agreed to pay Marshall (i) 30% of the net invoice price for the
sale of our software to End Users, and (ii) 2% of the net invoice price for the sale of hardware to
End Users, in each case collected by us on or before February 12, 2012, with a minimum annual
payment of $50 for three years. Marshall agreed to pay 50% of the costs and expenses incurred by us
in relation to any test installations involving sales or prospective sales to End Users. The
Company recorded an expense of $50,000 in each of 2007, 2008 and 2009 and owed no minimum payment
in 2010.
NOTE 4: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Marketable securities consist of marketable debt securities. These securities were accounted
for in accordance with FASB ASC 320-10-25. Accordingly, the unrealized gains (losses) associated
with these securities were reported in the equity section as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss).
Realized gains or losses on marketable securities were recorded in the statement of operations
within the Other income (expenses), other category. The cost of the securities for determining
gain or loss was measured by specific identification. Realized gains and losses on sales of
investments were immaterial in 2010, 2009 and 2008. Interest income of $30, $76 and $647 was
recorded in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
F-17
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, cash equivalents consisted of the following:
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Value | |||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
$ | 6,764 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,764 | ||||||||
Total included in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 6,764 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,764 | ||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Value | |||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
$ | 10,210 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10,210 | ||||||||
Total included in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 10,210 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10,210 | ||||||||
The Company measures certain financial assets, including cash equivalents and
available-for-sale marketable securities at fair value on a recurring basis. In accordance with
FASB ASC 820-10-30, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for
considering such assumptions, FASB ASC 820-10-35 establishes a three-level hierarchy which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The three hierarchy levels are defined as
follows:
Level 1 Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets. The fair value of available-for-sale securities included in the Level 1 category is based
on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market. The Level 1
category at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 includes funds held in a commercial paper sweep
account totaling $6,764 and $10,210, which are included in cash and cash equivalents in the
consolidated balance sheet.
Level 2 Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted
prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. At December 31, 2010 and 2009,
the Company had no Level 2 financial assets on its consolidated balance sheet.
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and involve management judgment
and the reporting entitys own assumptions about market participants and pricing. At December 31,
2010 and 2009, the Company had no Level 3 financial assets on its consolidated balance sheet.
The hierarchy level assigned to each security in the Companys cash equivalents is based on
its assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs used in the valuation of such
instruments at the measurement date. The Company did not have any financial liabilities that were
covered by FASB ASC 820-10-30 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
F-18
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 5: CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The Company entered into a capital lease arrangement in July 2010 for certain computer
equipment with imputed interest of 15.6% per year. The lease requires monthly payments of $4
through September 2012.
Other information relating to the capital lease equipment is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cost |
$ | 89 | $ | 322 | ||||
Less: accumulated amortization |
(14 | ) | (322 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 75 | $ | | ||||
Amortization expense for capital lease assets was $14, $53 and $67 for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is included in depreciation and amortization
expense.
Future lease payments under the capital lease are as follows:
For the Years Ending December 31, | Amount | |||
2011 |
$ | 46 | ||
2012 |
44 | |||
Total payments |
90 | |||
Less: portion representing interest |
(13 | ) | ||
Principal portion |
77 | |||
Less: current portion |
(37 | ) | ||
Long-term portion |
$ | 40 | ||
Future maturities of capital lease obligations are as follows:
Years Ending December 31, | Amount | |||
2011 |
37 | |||
2012 |
40 | |||
Total |
$ | 77 | ||
F-19
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 6: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
The Company leases approximately 19 square feet of office and warehouse space located at 5929
Baker Road, Minnetonka, Minnesota. In July 2010, the Company entered into an amendment that
extended the term of the lease through January 31, 2018. In consideration for this extension, the
landlord provided the Company with a leasehold improvement allowance totaling $191 and a reduction
in base rent per square foot. The leasehold allowance was recorded as an addition to deferred rent.
See Note 2 (Other Financial Statement Information). The Company will recognize the leasehold
improvement allowance on a straight-line basis as a benefit to rent expense over the life of the
lease, along with the existing deferred rent credit balance of $60 as of the date of the amendment.
In addition, the amendment contains a rent escalation provision, which also will be recognized on
a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company had drawn upon the entire amount of
leasehold improvement allowances as of December 31, 2010. The lease requires the Company to
maintain a letter of credit in the amount of $300 as collateral which will be released as follows:
to $240 on August 1, 2011; to $180 on August 1, 2012; to $120 on August 1, 2013; to $60 on August
1, 2014; and to $0 on August 1, 2015. The amount of the letter of credit as of December 31, 2010
was $300. In addition, the Company leases office space of approximately 10 square feet to support
its Canadian operations at a facility located at 4510 Rhodes Drive, Suite 800, Windsor, Ontario
under a lease that, as amended, extends through June 30, 2014. Pursuant to the lease, the Company
has a one-time option to cancel the lease on June 30, 2012 for a fee of approximately $39.
Rent expense under the operating leases was $378, $361 and $526 for the years ended December
31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments for operating leases are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, | Lease Obligations | |||
2011 |
$ | 242 | ||
2012 |
245 | |||
2013 |
243 | |||
2014 |
219 | |||
2015 |
195 | |||
Thereafter |
404 | |||
Total future minimum obligations |
$ | 1,548 | ||
Litigation
The Company was not party to any material legal proceedings as of December 31, 2010.
F-20
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revolving Line-of-Credit
In March 2010, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank
(the Loan and Security Agreement). The Loan and Security Agreement provides the Company with a
revolving line-of-credit up to $2,500 at an interest rate of prime plus 1.5%. The amount available
to the Company at any given time is the lesser of (a) $2,500, or (b) the amount available under the
Companys borrowing base (75% of the Companys eligible accounts receivable plus 50% of the
Companys eligible inventory) minus (1) the dollar equivalent amount of all outstanding letters of
credit, (2) 10% of each outstanding foreign exchange contract, (3) any amounts used for cash
management services, and (4) the outstanding principal balance of any advances. While there are
outstanding credit extensions (other than the Companys outstanding lease letter of credit), the
Company must maintain a minimum tangible net worth as follows: March 18, 2010 through June 30,
2010 ($10,500); July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 ($8,500); and January 1, 2011 and thereafter
($7,500). These tangible net worth minimums increase (a) quarterly by 75% of the Companys net
income for each fiscal quarter then ended and (b) by 75% of the proceeds from the Companys
issuances of equity after March 18, 2010 and/or the principal amount of subordinated debt. Under
the agreement the Company is generally required to obtain the prior written consent of Silicon
Valley Bank to, among other things, (a) dispose of assets, (b) change its business, (c) liquidate
or dissolve, (d) change CEO or COO (replacements must be satisfactory to the lender), (e) enter
into any transaction in which the Companys shareholders who were not shareholders immediately
prior to such transaction own more than 40% of the Companys voting stock (subject to limited
exceptions) after the transaction, (f) merge or consolidate with any other person, (g) acquire all
or substantially all of the capital stock or property of another person, or (h) become liable for
any indebtedness (other than permitted indebtedness). The line of credit is secured by all assets
of the Company. The Loan and Security Agreement matures on March 17, 2011. As of December 31,
2010, the Company met the applicable minimum tangible net worth requirement. The Company had a zero
outstanding balance on this line of credit as of December 31, 2010. In connection with the July
2010 lease amendment for the Companys corporate offices, Silicon Valley Bank issued a letter of
credit in the amount of $300 on the Companys behalf, which effectively reduced the amount
available under the Loan and Security Agreement to $2,200. The revolving line-of-credit was
amended during January 2011 to extend the maturity date to March 2012 and reduce the minimum
tangible net worth covenant. See Note 14 (Subsequent Events).
NOTE 7: SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Registered Direct Offerings
In November 2010, the Company sold a total of 1,425 shares of the Companys common stock at
$1.25 per share and warrants to purchase up to 285 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$1.4375 per share pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 which was declared effective by
the Securities and Exchange Commission in September 2009. The Company obtained approximately
$1,609 in net proceeds as a result of this registered direct offering.
In November 2009, the Company sold a total of 2,615 shares of the Companys common stock at
$2.90 per share pursuant to the above-referenced registration statement. The Company obtained
approximately $6,903 in net proceeds as a result of this registered direct offering.
F-21
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Warrants
The Company has issued common stock purchase warrants to certain debt holders, contractors,
and investors in connection with various transactions. The Company values the warrants using the
Black-Scholes pricing model and they are recorded based on the reason for their issuance.
Warrants held by non-employees during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Average | Common | Average | Common | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Exercise | Stock | Exercise | Stock | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
Warrants | Price | Warrants | Price | Warrants | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
1,357 | $ | 4.55 | 1,637 | $ | 5.20 | 1,866 | $ | 5.28 | |||||||||||||||
Granted |
326 | 1.62 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(63 | ) | 3.20 | | | (130 | ) | 3.29 | ||||||||||||||||
Expired |
(170 | ) | 8.34 | (280 | ) | 8.39 | (99 | ) | 9.04 | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of year |
1,450 | $ | 3.50 | 1,357 | $ | 4.55 | 1,637 | $ | 5.20 | |||||||||||||||
Non-exercisable |
| | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding and exercisable at end of year |
1,450 | $ | 3.50 | 1,357 | $ | 4.55 | 1,637 | $ | 5.20 | |||||||||||||||
In March 2010, the Company issued Silicon Valley Bank a 10-year fully vested warrant to
purchase up to 41 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $2.90 per share, as
additional consideration for the Loan and Security Agreement. Fair value at the date of grant was
$1.59 per warrant. In addition, the Company issued three-year fully vested warrants to purchase
285 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.4375 to investors in its registered direct
offering completed in November 2010. These warrants are included in the above table.
The Company received total proceeds of $201 for common stock warrants exercised during 2010.
The intrinsic value related to these warrants was $29. No common stock warrants were exercised in
2009. The Company received total proceeds of $372 for common stock warrants exercised in 2008
which had an intrinsic value of $410.
The Company issued a warrant to purchase 450 shares of common stock to the underwriter of the
Companys initial public offering, Feltl and Company. The warrant, which is included in the above
table, became exercisable in November 2007 and expires in November 2011.
As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average contractual life of the
outstanding warrants was 1.27 years, 1.45 years and 2.13 years, respectively.
NOTE 8: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT PLANS
Warrants
The Company has also issued common stock warrants to employees as stock-based compensation.
The Company values the warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The warrants vest
immediately and have exercise periods of five years.
F-22
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Warrants held by employees during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Average | Common | Average | Common | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Exercise | Stock | Exercise | Stock | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
Warrants | Price | Warrants | Price | Warrants | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
229 | $ | 8.09 | 322 | $ | 7.00 | 363 | $ | 6.21 | |||||||||||||||
Granted |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(7 | ) | 2.25 | (15 | ) | 2.25 | (41 | ) | 0.09 | |||||||||||||||
Expired |
(122 | ) | 7.66 | (78 | ) | 4.71 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding and exercisable at end of year |
100 | $ | 9.00 | 229 | $ | 8.09 | 322 | $ | 7.00 | |||||||||||||||
All employee common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2010 have
a weighted average exercise price of $9.00 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of
0.19 years. The intrinsic value related to these warrants was $0 as of December 31, 2010.
The Company received total proceeds of $15 for common stock warrants exercised during 2010.
The intrinsic value related to these warrants was $7. The Company received total proceeds of $34
for common stock warrants exercised during 2009. The intrinsic value related to these warrants was
$0. The Company received total proceeds of $4 for common stock warrants exercised during 2008.
The intrinsic value related to these warrants was $152.
Stock options
Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan
In March 2006, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (now
known as the Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the EIP)) which was approved by the
Companys shareholders in February 2007. Participants in the EIP may include the Companys
employees, officers, directors, consultants, or independent contractors. The EIP authorizes the
grant of options to purchase common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), the grant of options
that do not qualify as incentive stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock
bonuses, cash bonuses, stock appreciation rights, performance awards, dividend equivalents,
warrants and other equity based awards. The number of shares of common stock originally reserved
for issuance under the EIP was 1,000 shares. In November 2007, the Companys shareholders approved
an amendment to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance to 1,750. In June 2009, the
Companys shareholders approved an amendment to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance
to 2,125 and also increased the maximum number of shares for which awards may be granted to any
individual participant in any calendar year from 300 to 500. In June 2010, the Companys
shareholders approved an amendment to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance to 2,400.
The EIP expires in March 2016. As of December 31, 2010, there were 153 shares available for
future awards under the EIP.
F-23
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Incentive options may be granted only to the Companys officers, employees or corporate
affiliates. Non-statutory options may be granted to employees, consultants, directors or
independent contractors who the committee determines shall receive awards under the EIP. The
Company will not grant non-statutory options under the EIP with an exercise price of less than 85%
of the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The Company issues
new common stock shares when stock options are exercised.
2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
In April 2006, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan (the DSOP) which was approved by the Companys shareholders in February 2007. The
DSOP provides for the grant of options to members of the Companys Board of Directors who are not
employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. Under the DSOP, non-employee directors as of
February 27, 2006 and each non-employee director thereafter elected to the Board of Directors is
automatically entitled to a grant of an option for the purchase of 40 shares of common stock, 10 of
which vest and become exercisable on the date of grant, and additional increments of 10 shares
become exercisable and vest upon each directors reelection to the Board of Directors. The number
of shares originally reserved for awards under the DSOP was 510 shares. Options are required to be
granted at fair market value. As of December 31, 2010, there were 260 shares available for future
awards under the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
The Company values the options using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The options vest over a
four-year period and have a five-year term. In April 2008, as part of a former directors
resignation from the Board of Directors, a stock option for the purchase of 10 shares was modified
to extend the expiration date and immediately vest, resulting in $19 of non-cash stock-based
compensation expense. In September 2008, as part of a former employees separation from the
Company, a stock option for the purchase of 120 shares was modified to extend the expiration date
and immediately vest, resulting in $94 of non-cash stock-based compensation expense.
A summary of the changes in outstanding stock options under all equity incentive plans is as
follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Options | Exercise | |||||||
Outstanding | Price | |||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
1,314 | $ | 4.65 | |||||
Granted |
993 | 1.70 | ||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(654 | ) | 4.63 | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
1,653 | $ | 2.89 | |||||
Granted |
380 | 1.66 | ||||||
Exercised |
(21 | ) | 1.26 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
(402 | ) | 3.90 | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
1,610 | $ | 2.36 | |||||
Granted |
889 | 1.84 | ||||||
Exercised |
(16 | ) | 1.15 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
(201 | ) | 1.34 | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
2,282 | $ | 2.26 | |||||
F-24
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company received total proceeds of $18 and $35 for stock options exercised during 2010 and
2009, respectively. The intrinsic value related to these options was $20 and $27 in 2010 and 2009,
respectively. There were no stock option exercises in 2008.
Information with respect to employee common stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2010 is as follows:
Stock Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average | Weighted | Aggregate | Weighted | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise | Number | Remaining | Average | Intrinsic | Options | Average | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||||||
Prices Between | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Exercise Price | Value | Exercisable | Exercise Price | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
$0.67 $1.12 |
430 | 8.1 Years | $ | 0.80 | $ | 278 | 350 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 250 | |||||||||||||||
$1.13 $1.51 |
460 | 9.3 Years | 1.33 | 56 | 120 | 1.37 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
$1.52 $2.33 |
472 | 4.8 Years | 1.82 | | 312 | 1.77 | | |||||||||||||||||||
$2.34 $2.93 |
478 | 7.9 Years | 2.53 | | 51 | 2.81 | | |||||||||||||||||||
$2.94 $7.38 |
442 | 0.9 Years | 4.83 | | 381 | 4.74 | | |||||||||||||||||||
2,282 | 6.2 Years | $ | 2.26 | $ | 334 | 1,214 | $ | 2.41 | $ | 260 | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock and Share Awards |
The Company issued restricted stock awards of 61 shares to two executive officers and certain
key employees in March 2010. Of the shares, 30 vest in annual installments over a three-year
period with continued employment. The remaining 31 shares require both continued employment and
achievement of certain revenue targets in each of the three years. The weighted average fair value
of the shares was based on the per share closing market price on the date of grant of $2.55. The
fair market value of the grants totaled $156 and is being recognized as stock compensation expense
over the one and three-year periods. As of December 31, 2010, $75 remained to be expensed.
The Company issued restricted stock awards of 38 shares to an employee and 19 shares to an
independent contractor in August 2010. Vesting requires continued service over a one-year period.
The weighted average fair value of the shares was based on the per share closing market price on
the date of grant of $1.82. The fair market value of the grants totaled $104 and is being
recognized as stock compensation expense over a one-year period. The balance of $64 will be
recognized as stock compensation over the remainder of the one-year period.
The Company issued a restricted stock award of 5 shares to an independent contractor in
September 2010. Vesting requires both continued services and achievement of certain product
development releases over a one-year period. The weighted average fair value of the shares was
based on the per share closing market price on the date of grant of $1.28. The fair market value
of the grant totaled $6 and is being recognized as stock compensation expense over a one-year
period. As of December 31, 2010, $4 remained to be expensed.
The Company issued restricted stock awards of 34 shares to an independent contractor in
November 2010. Vesting requires continued service over a three-month period. The weighted average
fair value of the shares was based on the per share closing market price on the date of grant of
$1.40. The fair market value of the grants totaled $48, of which $29 was recognized as stock compensation expense in 2010. The
balance of $19 will be recognized as stock compensation over the remainder of the one-month period.
F-25
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company issued a restricted stock award of 25 shares and a stock bonus of 5 shares in
April 2009 to an executive officer. The vesting condition of the restricted stock included
continued employment through the first anniversary of grant and achievement of a certain revenue
target for fiscal 2009. The vesting condition related to the revenue target was met in 2009 and
the continued employment condition was met in April 2010. The fair value of the shares was based on
the per share closing market price on the date of grant of $2.20 . The fair market value of the
grant totaled $66 and was recognized as stock compensation expense on a straight-line basis over
the one-year restriction period. In April 2010, 11 of the 25 shares of the restricted stock award
were tendered back to the Company in consideration for satisfying all associated taxes on behalf of
the employee.
A summary of the changes in outstanding restricted stock and share awards is as follows:
Restricted | Weighted | |||||||
Stock Awards | Average | |||||||
Outstanding | Price | |||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
6 | $ | 6.25 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
(6 | ) | 6.25 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
| | ||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
| $ | | |||||
Granted |
30 | 2.20 | ||||||
Vested |
(5 | ) | 2.20 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
| | ||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
25 | $ | 2.20 | |||||
Granted |
157 | 2.00 | ||||||
Vested |
(14 | ) | 2.20 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
(16 | ) | 2.28 | |||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
152 | $ | 1.98 | |||||
Stock Compensation Expense Information
FASB ASC 718-10 requires measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
stock-based payments including warrants, stock options, restricted stock grants and stock bonuses
based on estimated fair values. Following is a summary of compensation expense recognized for the
issuance of warrants, stock options, restricted stock grants and stock bonuses for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation costs included in: |
||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ | 9 | $ | 6 | $ | 20 | ||||||
Sales and marketing expenses |
117 | 331 | 202 | |||||||||
Research and development expenses |
40 | 42 | 37 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
702 | 319 | 1,054 | |||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expenses |
$ | 868 | $ | 698 | $ | 1,313 | ||||||
F-26
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
At December 31, 2010, there was approximately $946 of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to unvested share-based awards. The expense will be recognized ratably over the next 1.86
years and will be adjusted for any future changes in estimated forfeitures. The estimated
forfeiture rate is 19.3% and 0% at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Valuation Information for Stock-Based Compensation
For purposes of determining estimated fair value under FASB ASC 718-10, the Company computed
the estimated fair values of stock options using the Black-Scholes model. The weighted average
estimated fair value of stock options granted was $1.25, $1.06 and $1.11 per share for 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. These values were calculated using the following weighted average
assumptions:
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Expected life |
4.04 to 4.30 Years | 3.25 Years | 3.31 Years | |||||||||
Dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
Expected volatility |
91.7 to 94.3 | % | 98 to 105.6 | % | 98.5 | % | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.3 to 2.4 | % | 1.3 to 1.6 | % | 1.9 | % |
The estimated fair value of stock options that vested during 2010, 2009
and 2008 was $670, $683 and $1,324, respectively.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the
term of the Companys stock options. Due to the limited historical data to rely upon, the Company
utilized the Simplified method in developing an estimate of expected term in accordance with FASB
ASC 718-10-S99-1 for awards granted prior to January 1, 2010. The Company used historical closing
stock price volatility for a period equal to the period its common stock has been trading publicly.
Due to the limited historical data prior to January 1, 2010, the Company used a weighted average
of other publicly traded stock volatility for the remaining expected term of the options granted
prior to January 1, 2010. From January 2010, the Company calculated the estimated expected life
based upon historical exercise data. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Companys
history and expectation of no future dividend payouts.
Stock-based compensation expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced
for estimated forfeitures. FASB 718-10-55 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of
grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. Prior to January 1, 2010, the Company had little historical experience on which to base
an assumption and used a zero percent forfeiture rate assumption. From January 2010, the Company
applied a pre-vesting forfeiture rate of 18.3 to 19.3% based on upon actual historical experience
for all employee option awards. The Company continues to apply a zero forfeiture rate to those
options granted to members of its Board of Directors.
In March 2010, the Company issued Silicon Valley Bank a 10-year fully vested warrant to
purchase up to 41 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $2.90 per share, as
additional consideration for the Loan and Security Agreement. The Company computed the estimated
fair value of the warrant using the Black-Scholes model of $1.59 per share based on the assumptions
outlined above with an expected life of five years and zero percent forfeiture rate. The fair
value of $66 is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the one-year term of the agreement as
interest expense in the Companys Statement of Operations. As of December 31, 2010, $16 remained to
be expensed.
F-27
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2007 Associate Stock Purchase Plan
In November 2007, the Companys shareholders approved the 2007 Associate Stock Purchase Plan,
under which 300 shares were reserved for purchase by the Companys associates (employees). In June
2010, the Companys shareholders approved an amendment to increase the number of shares reserved
for issuance to 400. The purchase price of the shares under the plan is the lesser of 85% of the
fair market value on the first or last day of the offering period. Offering periods are every six
months ending on June 30 and December 31. Associates may designate up to ten percent of their
compensation for the purchase of shares under the plan. Total shares purchased by associates under
the plan were 28, 83 and 143 in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
There were 146 shares reserved and available under the plan as of December 31, 2010.
Employee Benefit Plan
In 2007, the Company established a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan for eligible
associates. Associates may contribute up to 15% of their pretax compensation to the plan. There
is currently no plan for a Company contribution match.
NOTE 9: SEGMENT INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company views its operations and manages its business as one reportable segment, providing
digital signage solutions to a variety of companies, primarily in its targeted vertical markets.
Factors used to identify the Companys single operating segment include the financial information
available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker in making decisions about how to
allocate resources and assess performance. The Company markets its products and services through
its headquarters in the United States and its wholly-owned subsidiary operating in Canada.
Net sales per geographic region, based on location of end customer, are summarized as follows:
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
United States |
$ | 8,093 | $ | 4,379 | $ | 6,271 | ||||||
Canada |
202 | 127 | 1,110 | |||||||||
Other countries |
272 | 503 | | |||||||||
Total Sales |
$ | 8,567 | $ | 5,009 | $ | 7,381 | ||||||
Geographic segments of property and equipment are as follows at:
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net: |
||||||||
United States |
$ | 905 | $ | 935 | ||||
Canada |
114 | 307 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,019 | $ | 1,242 | ||||
F-28
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
A significant portion of the Companys revenue is derived from a few major customers.
Customers with greater than 10% of total sales are represented on the following table:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Customer | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Chrysler (BBDO Detroit/Windsor) ** |
46.7 | % | 14.3 | % | 31.8 | % | ||||||
Aramark |
13.1 | % | 21.7 | % | * | |||||||
Reuters Ltd. |
* | 15.8 | % | * | ||||||||
KFC |
* | 10.1 | % | 17.9 | % | |||||||
13.1 | % | 47.6 | % | 17.9 | % | |||||||
* | Sales to these customers were less than 10% of total sales for the period reported. | |
** | Includes sales to BBDO Detroit/Windsor for 2009 and 2008. |
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk
consist principally of accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, a significant portion
of the Companys accounts receivable was concentrated with one customer. Customers with greater
than 10% of total accounts receivable are represented on the following table:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
Customer | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Chrysler |
48.3 | % | 41.8 | % | ||||
NOTE 10: INCOME TAXES
The Company has not recorded a current or deferred tax provision for the years ended December
31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company has not provided for U.S. taxes on the cumulative loss of approximately $6,871
incurred by its Canadian wholly-owned subsidiary. If any future undistributed earnings of the
Companys Canadian subsidiary are remitted to the Company, income taxes, if any, after the
application of foreign tax credits will be provided at that time.
F-29
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets
and liabilities and tax credit and operating loss carryforwards that create deferred tax assets and
liabilities are as follows:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Current asset / (liability): |
||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 13 | $ | 20 | ||||
Property and equipment |
(33 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses |
203 | 29 | ||||||
Severance |
| 9 | ||||||
Non-qualified stock options |
475 | 410 | ||||||
Non-current asset: |
||||||||
Net foreign carryforwards |
2,096 | 2,077 | ||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
21,603 | 19,620 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
24,357 | 21,973 | ||||||
Less: valuation allowance |
(24,357 | ) | (21,973 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
amounts used for income tax purposes. The valuation allowance has been established due to the
uncertainty of future taxable income, which is necessary to realize the benefits of the deferred
tax assets. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had federal net operating loss, or NOL,
carryforwards of approximately $58,130, which will begin to expire in 2020. The Company also has
various state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of approximately $32,000,
which will begin to expire in 2020. The utilization of a portion of the Companys NOLs and
carryforwards is subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Subsequent
equity changes could further limit the utilization of these NOLs and credit carryforwards. The
Company had not undertaken a 382 study as of December 31, 2010.
Realization of the NOL carryforwards and other deferred tax temporary differences are
contingent on future taxable earnings. The deferred tax asset was reviewed for expected utilization
using a more likely than not approach by assessing the available positive and negative evidence
surrounding its recoverability. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been recorded against
the Companys deferred tax asset.
The Company has adopted accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions. This
accounting guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides
guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. The adoption of uncertain tax position guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. Additionally, the adoption of the
guidance had no impact on retained earnings. The Company had no uncertain tax positions as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
income tax expense. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had no accruals for the payment of
tax-related interest and there were no tax interest or penalties recognized in the statement of
operations. The Companys federal and state tax returns are potentially open to examinations for
the years 2006-2010.
F-30
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
The components of income tax expense (benefit) consist of the following:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision: |
||||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (1,908 | ) | $ | (2,088 | ) | $ | (5,179 | ) | |||
State |
(148 | ) | 485 | (990 | ) | |||||||
Foreign |
(328 | ) | (693 | ) | (1,144 | ) | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
2,384 | 2,296 | 7,313 | |||||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
The Company will continue to assess and evaluate strategies to enable the deferred tax
asset, or a portion thereof, to be utilized, and will reduce the valuation allowance appropriately
at such time when it is determined that the more likely than not criteria is satisfied.
The Companys provision for income taxes differs from the expected tax benefit amount computed
by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34.0% to loss before taxes as a result of the
following:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Federal statutory rate |
(34.0) | % | (34.0) | % | (34.0) | % | ||||||
State taxes |
(2.0 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (4.8 | ) | ||||||
Foreign rate differential |
0.5 | 0.9 | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Intangibles expense |
| | 3.0 | |||||||||
Other |
0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Change in estimated tax rate |
3.5 | 12.6 | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
30.2 | 22.6 | 35.9 | |||||||||
| % | | % | | % | |||||||
F-31
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 11: SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table set forth a summary of the Companys quarterly financial information for
each of the four quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 1,075 | $ | 1,916 | $ | 2,672 | $ | 2,904 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
424 | 914 | 1,324 | 1,323 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(2,761 | ) | (2,056 | ) | (1,387 | ) | (1,651 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,753 | ) | $ | (2,064 | ) | $ | (1,402 | ) | $ | (1,664 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share basic and diluted |
$ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 1,433 | $ | 963 | $ | 1,076 | $ | 1,537 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
273 | 220 | 362 | 568 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(2,943 | ) | (2,669 | ) | (2,478 | ) | (2,163 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,903 | ) | $ | (2,655 | ) | $ | (2,471 | ) | $ | (2,154 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share basic and diluted |
$ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) |
NOTE 12: IMPAIRMENT OF NETWORK EQUIPMENT HELD FOR SALE
In August 2007, the Company announced that its largest customer during 2007, NewSight
Corporation (NewSight), had re-prioritized various elements of its planned digital signage system
implementations, including a delay in the rollout of network installations into large, upscale
malls, and the launch, installation and operation of digital signage networks in physicians
offices. In connection with NewSights re-prioritization, the Company agreed to provide digital
signage to retrofit 102 stores of an existing network and newly configure approximately 79 stores
of a grocery store chain in the Midwest, Meijer, Inc. (Meijer), under a digital signage
agreement.
In consideration of this undertaking to complete the Meijer Network (as defined below), the
Company agreed to take a promissory note and security interest in certain equipment, while it
understood NewSight was in the process of raising capital. Effective October 2007, NewSight issued
the Company a Secured Promissory Note (the Note) for goods provided and services rendered, in an
original principal amount of $1,760. In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company also
entered into a Security Agreement, dated October 2007, with NewSight pursuant to which the Company
acquired a security interest in certain collateral of NewSight, consisting of all existing and
after-acquired video screens and monitors and other equipment for digital signage then or
thereafter provided by the Company to NewSight, including all such equipment located in the Fashion
Square Mall in Saginaw, Michigan and the Asheville Mall in Asheville, North Carolina, and any
grocery store premises operated by Meijer and its affiliates (the Meijer Network) and all related
hardware, software and parts used in connection with such equipment or the Meijer Network and all
proceeds from such personal property, but not including any intellectual property of NewSight (the
Collateral). Pursuant to the Note, this debt obligation would mature on the first to occur of
(1) successful completion of NewSights financing efforts, or (2) December 31, 2007.
F-32
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company extended the term of the Note to allow NewSight more time to complete its
financing efforts, in January 2008, April 2008 and June 2008. In connection with the first of such
extensions, the Company agreed to credit NewSight customer deposits aggregating $277 against the
amount of the Note. In connection with the second extension, the Company agreed to terminate
several other agreements with NewSight: the physician office agreement to develop the NewSight on
Health physicians network; the agreement for development of the Pyramid Mall network; and the 3-D
software development agreement.
The Note, as amended, matured in August 2008. NewSights aggregate indebtedness to the
Company, including the Note, accrued interest, and all accrued warehousing fees and expenses and
network operating and maintenance expenses, totaled $2,761, net of deferred revenue of $1,030, at
such date (the Aggregate Indebtedness). Given NewSights inability to obtain financing that would
have allowed it to repay this obligation and given the termination of NewSights business
relationship with Meijer regarding the Meijer Network, the Company entered into negotiations with
NewSight and its principal creditor, Prentice Capital Management, L.P. (Prentice), to obtain
ownership of the Collateral (other than the Released Collateral (as defined below)) (the
Surrendered Collateral) in recognition of its rights as a secured creditor. The Released
Collateral represented Collateral presently installed at the stores operated by CBL Associated at
the Fashion Square Mall and the Asheville Mall.
In August 2008, the Company entered into a Turnover and Surrender Agreement with NewSight (the
Turnover and Surrender Agreement) under which NewSight surrendered, transferred and turned over
to the Company, and the Company accepted, the Surrendered Collateral in full satisfaction of the
Aggregate Indebtedness. The Company agreed that, except for the obligations under the Turnover and
Surrender Agreement, NewSight had no further obligations to it. The Surrendered Collateral was
turned over and surrendered to the Company on an as is and where is basis. Under the Turnover
and Surrender Agreement, NewSight granted the Company an irrevocable license and consent to enter
into any properties licensed to or leased by NewSight for the purpose of taking possession and
control of such collateral. NewSight further agreed to indemnify and hold the Company and its
subsidiary, and all of its shareholders, agents, officers and directors harmless against any and
all claims, losses and expenses (including attorneys fees) related to any claims against them as a
result of a breach of any covenant, representation or warranty by NewSight in the Turnover and
Surrender Agreement, and claims by any creditor, shareholder or trustee of NewSight relating to the
transfer and surrender under the Turnover and Surrender Agreement. The Company and NewSight also
agreed to a mutual release of all claims except obligations arising under the Turnover and
Surrender Agreement.
In addition, the Company entered into a Consent Agreement with Prentice in August 2008 (the
Consent Agreement) pursuant to which Prentice consented to the terms and conditions of the
Turnover and Surrender Agreement. The Consent Agreement also provided for the allocation of any
future proceeds received or paid to the Company in connection with the Surrendered Collateral or
the Meijer Network. In general, such funds would be applied in the following manner: (1) first to
payment of the Companys expenses in connection with the turnover and surrender, (2) second to
payment of the Companys expenses in connection with replacing, modifying or enhancing the
Surrendered Collateral, (3) third to the Company in payment of the Aggregate Indebtedness, (4)
fourth the next $100 of proceeds would be allocated 70% to the Company and 30% to Prentice, and (5)
fifth all remaining proceeds would be allocated 50% to the Company and 50% to Prentice. These
allocations also applied in the event of the sale or contribution by the Company of the Surrendered
Collateral or the Meijer Network. However, such allocations did not apply to amounts paid or
payable to the Company in payment or reimbursement of its monthly costs to operate or service the
Meijer Network. The rights and interests granted by the Company to Prentice under the Consent
Agreement were to expire on the third anniversary of the Consent Agreement. The Company and
Prentice also generally agreed to a mutual release of all claims.
F-33
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
In August 2008, the Company also entered into an Interim Operating Agreement with ABC National
Television Sales, Inc. (ABC) and Met/Hodder, Inc. (MH) pursuant to which the parties continued
to operate the Meijer Network through October 2008 (the Interim Operating Agreement). The Company
entered into the Interim Operating Agreement to continue to run the Meijer Network for an interim
period necessary to establish a more permanent arrangement with respect to the Meijer Network
ownership and placement in Meijer stores. The Company received $51, paid out of advertising
revenues on the Meijer Network, under this agreement in 2008.
Meijer then sent a request for proposal to several national network providers, including the
Company, to build out the remaining network of 82 stores and continue to support the existing
network of 102 stores in which the Company owned the network hardware. The Company had expected
Meijer to choose one of these network providers in the fourth quarter of 2008, with which to move
forward. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had reclassified the NewSight account receivable
balance of $2,430, deferred revenue of $1,030, deferred costs of $586, and the accrued finders
fees of $48 to Network equipment held for sale totaling $1,937. This asset appeared as a separate
line on the balance sheet as a current asset at September 30, 2008.
Subsequent to December 31, 2008, Meijer abandoned plans to maintain the network. As a result,
the Company moved approximately $171 of equipment from the in-box collateral base into inventory
and recorded an impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2008 on the remaining $1,766 of network
equipment held for sale.
NOTE 13: SEVERANCE EXPENSE
In June 2008, the Company announced that John Witham had resigned from his positions as the
Companys Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The Board of Directors approved an
arrangement whereby in consideration for Mr. Withams execution of a reasonable and customary
release, Mr. Witham would receive severance payments equal to one and a half times his base salary,
one and a half times his prior year bonus, medical (COBRA) benefits for one year, and payment for
accrued, unused paid time off, as set forth in his employment agreement for a termination without
cause, as well as an extension of the amount of time Mr. Witham had to exercise his vested stock
options. In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded total charges of $353 related to Mr.
Withams separation.
In September 2008, the Company announced that Jeffrey Mack had resigned from his positions as
the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board
of Directors approved an arrangement whereby in consideration for Mr. Macks execution of a
reasonable and customary release, Mr. Mack would receive severance payments equal to one years
base salary, medical (COBRA) benefits for one year, accelerated vesting of his options for the
purchase of 120 shares at $2.80 per share, and a 90-day extension of the post-termination
exercisability of (a) such options and (b) his warrants for the purchase of 35 shares at $2.25 per
share. In the third quarter of 2008, the Company recorded total charges of $286 for severance
expense, as well as $94 of non-cash stock-based compensation, related to Mr. Macks separation.
In November and December 2008, the Company announced workforce reductions of 35 and 27 people,
respectively, including employees and contractors at both its U.S. and Canadian operations, to
better match its infrastructure and expenses with sales levels and current client projects.
Coupled with three other U.S. employee resignations prior to the December 2008 reduction in force,
these actions resulted in an approximate 40 percent total headcount reduction during the fourth
quarter of 2008. The combined severance expense from the two workforce reductions totaled $274.
F-34
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
In March and April 2009, the Company continued to make organizational changes to better
align resources. The combined severance expense related to these workforce reductions totaled $237
and $210, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, a total severance amount of $37 remained to be
paid in 2010.
The following table provides financial information on the employee severance expense and
remaining accrued balance at December 31, 2010:
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ | | $ | 85 | $ | 43 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
| | 9 | |||||||||
Research and development |
| | 202 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
| 362 | 779 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | 447 | $ | 1,033 | ||||||
Accrual | Accrual | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | Net | December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2009 | Additions | Payments | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Employee severance expense |
$ | 37 | $ | | $ | (37 | ) | $ | | |||||||
As part of the Companys employment agreements with certain executive employees, if such
employees are terminated without cause, additional severance expense may be due to such employees.
NOTE 14: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January 2011, the Company entered into a First Loan Modification Agreement with Silicon
Valley Bank pursuant to which the maturity date of the Companys existing revolving line of credit
was extended from March 2011 to March 2012. The revolving line of credit provides the Company with
credit up to $2,500 at an interest rate of prime plus 1.5%. The amount of credit available to the
Company at any given time is the lesser of (a) $2,500, or (b) the amount available under the
Companys borrowing base (75% of the Companys eligible accounts receivable plus 50% of the
Companys eligible inventory) minus (1) the dollar equivalent amount of all outstanding letters of
credit, (2) 10% of each outstanding foreign exchange contract, (3) any amounts used for cash
management services, and (4) the outstanding principal balance of any advances. Under the First
Loan Modification Agreement, the Company must maintain a minimum tangible net worth of at least
$5,500. This tangible net worth minimum increases (a) quarterly by 75% of the Companys net income
for each fiscal quarter then ended and (b) by 75% of the proceeds from future issuances of equity
and/or the principal amount of subordinated debt. The Company must comply with this tangible net
worth minimum while there are outstanding credit extensions (other than the Companys existing
lease letter of credit).
F-35
Table of Contents
WIRELESS RONIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
In addition, in connection with the Companys entry into the First Loan Modification
Agreement, the Company entered into an Amendment to Warrant Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank
pursuant to which the exercise price of the warrant originally issued to Silicon Valley Bank in
March 2010 was reduced to $1.378 per share. The reduced exercise price represents the five-day
average closing price per share of the Companys common stock for the period immediately preceding
the Companys entry into the First Loan Modification Agreement.
F-36
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to our Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to our Form SB-2 filed on October 12, 2006 (File No. 333- 136972)). | |
3.2
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2011 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
4.1
|
See exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. | |
4.2
|
Specimen common stock certificate of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Pre- Effective Amendment No. 1 to our Form SB-2 filed on October 12, 2006 (File No. 333- 136972)). | |
4.3
|
Form of Current Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 29, 2006 (File No. 333-136972)). | |
4.4
|
Form of Previous Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 29, 2006 (File No. 333-136972)). | |
4.5
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock pursuant to 2010 Registered Direct Offering. | |
10.1
|
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 29, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.2
|
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on December 26, 2006 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.3
|
Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Associate Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 29, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.4
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Granted under the Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on August 29, 2006 (File No. 333-136972)). | |
10.5
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement Granted under the Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on March 28, 2007 (File No. 001- 33169)). | |
10.6
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2008) (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.7
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). |
E-1
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.8
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Stephen F. Birke under the Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 10, 2008) (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.9
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Granted under the Wireless Ronin Technologies, Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 26, 2009 (File No. 001- 33169)). | |
10.10
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2009, between the Registrant and Darin P. McAreavey (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.11
|
Form of Amendment to Executive Employment Agreements, entered into by the Registrant and each of our executive officers, dated May 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2008 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.12
|
Form of Amendment to Executive Employment Agreements, entered into by the Registrant and each of our executive officers, dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 13, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.13
|
Separation Agreement and General Release between the Registrant and Brian S. Anderson, dated June 3, 2009 (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.14
|
Separation Agreement dated March 6, 2009, between Robert W. Whent and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 9, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.15
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and James C. Granger, dated April 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 21, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.16
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Scott W. Koller, dated December 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.17
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Executive Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Darin P. McAreavey, dated December 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). |
E-2
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.18
|
2010 Senior Management Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed January 6, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.19
|
2011 Senior Management Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.20
|
Lease Agreement by and between the Registrant and Utah State Retirement Investment Fund, dated April 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2007 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.21
|
First Amendment to Lease by and between the Registrant and Utah State Retirement Investment Fund, dated July 14, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.22
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement by and between the Registrant and Utah State Retirement Investment Fund, dated August 4, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 5, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.23
|
Amendment of Lease Agreement by and between Wireless Ronin Technologies (Canada), Inc. and Dieter Schwarz, dated July 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 7, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.24
|
Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Registrant and Silicon Valley Bank, dated March 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.25
|
Intellectual Property Security Agreement by and between the Registrant and Silicon Valley Bank, dated March 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.26
|
Stock Pledge Agreement by and between the Registrant and Silicon Valley Bank, dated March 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.27
|
Warrant to Purchase Stock issued by the the Registrant to Silicon Valley Bank, dated March 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.28
|
Placement Agency Agreement between the Registrant, Feltl and Company, Inc. and Barrington Research Associates, Inc., dated November 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.29
|
Form of Subscription Agreement for First 2009 Registered Direct Offering (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2009 (File No. 001- 33169)). | |
10.30
|
Placement Agency Agreement between the Registrant and Feltl and Company, Inc., dated November 12, 2009 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2009 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.31
|
Form of Subscription Agreement for Second 2009 Registered Direct Offering (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2009 (File No. 001- 33169)). |
E-3
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.32
|
Form of Subscription Agreement for 2010 Registered Direct Offering. | |
10.33
|
Placement Agency Agreement between the Registrant and Northland Capital Markets, dated October 26, 2010 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 16, 2010 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.34
|
First Amendment to Placement Agency Agreement between the Registrant and Northland Capital Markets, dated December 20, 2010. | |
10.35
|
First Loan Modification Agreement by and between the Registrant and Silicon Valley Bank, dated January 21, 2011 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8- K filed on January 21, 2011 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
10.36
|
Amendment No. 1 to Warrant to Purchase Stock issued by the Registrant to SVB Financial Group dated January 21, 2011 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2011 (File No. 001-33169)). | |
21
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. | |
23
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
E-4