CROWN CRAFTS INC - Annual Report: 2004 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

Commission File No. 1-7604

Crown Crafts, Inc.

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     þ

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes o          No þ

      As of September 28, 2003, 9,504,937 shares of Common Stock were outstanding, and the aggregate market value of the Common Stock (based upon the closing price of these shares on that date) held by persons other than Officers, Directors, and 5% shareholders was approximately $3,727,011.

      As of June 1, 2004, 9,504,937 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

      Crown Crafts, Inc. Proxy Statement in connection with its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Part III hereof).

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.     Business

      Crown Crafts, Inc. is a Delaware corporation as a result of the Company’s reincorporation in Delaware completed in 2003. The Company was originally formed as a Georgia corporation in 1957. The Company operates indirectly through its subsidiaries (Hamco, Inc.; Churchill Weavers, Inc.; Crown Crafts Infant Products, Inc. and, previously, Burgundy Interamericana) in the Infant Products segment within the Consumer Products industry. The Infant Products segment consists of infant bedding, bibs, soft goods and accessories. Sales are generally made directly to retailers, primarily mass merchants, large chain stores and gift stores. These products are marketed under a variety of Company-owned trademarks, under trademarks licensed from others, without trademarks as unbranded merchandise and with customers’ private labels.

      In response to changing business conditions in the consumer products industry, the Company made significant changes in its business operations over the last four years. In addition to a program of cost reductions and rationalization, the Company outsourced virtually all of its manufacturing to domestic and foreign contract manufacturers, with the exception of the specialty hand wovens produced by Churchill Weavers and, until recently, screen-printed infant bibs produced by Burgundy in Mexico. The Woven Products division, with manufacturing primarily in north Georgia, was sold on November 14, 2000 and net proceeds of $32.3 million were used to reduce debt. Following the outsourcing of adult bedding and bath, the Roxboro, North Carolina plant was sold on June 14, 2001 and the proceeds of $8.0 million were used to reduce debt. Also, the Company made a decision to exit the adult bedding and bath business, and its net assets related to that business of $12.4 million were sold effective July 23, 2001. Proceeds of the sale were $8.5 million cash plus the assumption of liabilities of $3.4 million as well as the assumption of certain contingent liabilities. Cash from the sale was used to reduce debt. After that sale, the Company has operated primarily in the infant and juvenile products business, but in describing the results of operations for fiscal 2002, reference is made to all of the product groups. Because of the sale of assets and the refinancing that occurred July 23, 2001, the Company’s historical results for fiscal 2002 and prior are not indicative of the Company’s future operations.

      In December 2002, the Company adopted a formal plan to change its sourcing strategy for certain products and close the Mexican manufacturing facility operated by Burgundy. This decision was based on extensive research by management which indicated that, due to lower wages and the elimination of certain governmental quotas on the importation of bibs, outsourcing the supply of products then being manufactured by Burgundy to Asian manufacturers was more cost-effective and competitive than maintaining operations in Mexico. Under the plan, Burgundy continued to operate through the first quarter of fiscal 2004, at which time the Company began to liquidate Burgundy’s assets. As a result of the decision of the Company to discontinue its Mexican operations, the Company recorded a $1.8 million restructuring charge to operations in the quarter ended December 29, 2002, which consisted primarily of a write-down of the property and equipment at the Mexican facility of approximately $800,000, inventory items deemed to be in excess of production requirements of approximately $600,000, an accrual for contractual termination benefits of approximately $300,000 due Burgundy’s entire workforce (approximately 130 employees) under the provisions of Mexico’s labor regulations and the write-off of goodwill of approximately $60,000. The Company paid approximately $189,000 of the severance benefits in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and paid the remainder through October 2003. The Company continued to charge the ongoing operating costs associated with Burgundy’s production in the period in which the costs were incurred. The Company incurred a loss of approximately $85,000 related to the operation and closure of this facility for the three-month period ended June 29, 2003, at which time the closure was complete.

Products

      The Company’s primary focus is on infant and juvenile products. Infant products include crib bedding, diaper stackers, mobiles, bibs, receiving blankets, burp cloths, bathing accessories and other infant soft goods and accessories. The Company also produces hand-woven throws for infants and adults, which are manufactured and imported in a variety of colors, designs and fabrics, including cotton, acrylic, cotton/acrylic blends, rayon, wool, fleece and chenille.

2

Table of Contents

      Historically, the company’s products also included two additional groups: 1) bedroom and bath products and 2) imported and jacquard woven throws. Bedroom products included comforters, comforter sets, sheets, pillowcases, sheet sets, pillow shams, bed skirts, duvets, decorative pillows, coverlets and jacquard-woven bedspreads.

      The table below indicates the allocation of sales of the Company’s products.

Product Design and Styling

      Research and development expenditures focus primarily on product design and styling. The Company believes styling and design are key components to its success. The Company’s designers and stylists work closely with the marketing staff and licensors to develop new designs. These designs, which are developed internally and obtained from numerous additional sources, including graphic artists, decorative fabric manufacturers, apparel designers and employees, include traditional, contemporary, textured and whimsical patterns across a broad spectrum of retail price points. The Company is continually developing new designs for all of its product groups using computer-aided-design systems to increase design flexibility, reduce costs and shorten the time for responding to customer demands and changing market trends. The Company also creates designs for exclusive sale by certain of its customers.

Sales and Marketing, Customers

      Products are marketed through a national sales force consisting of salaried sales executives and employees and independent commissioned sales representatives. Independent representatives are used most significantly in sales to the gift trade and infant markets. Sales outside the United States are made primarily through distributors.

      The Company’s customers consist principally of mass merchants, chain stores, department stores, specialty home furnishings stores, wholesale clubs, gift stores and catalogue and direct mail houses. The table below indicates customers representing more than 10% of gross sales.

      The Company’s sales offices are located in Huntington Beach, California; Gonzales, Louisiana; Berea, Kentucky and Rogers, Arkansas. Substantially all products are sold to retailers for resale to consumers. The Company’s infant product subsidiaries generally introduce new products once each year during the annual Juvenile Products Manufacturers’ Association (“JPMA”) trade show. Private label products are introduced throughout the year. New product introductions for the gift trade are concentrated in January through March and June through August when Churchill Weavers participates in numerous local and regional gift shows.

      In fiscal 2004, approximately 1% of the Company’s gross sales were made through its retail store in Berea, Kentucky. Stores in Calhoun, Georgia and Rancho Santa Margarita, California were closed in fiscal 2001 and a store in Roxboro, North Carolina was sold in fiscal 2002.

3

Table of Contents

Manufacturing

      The Company’s infant products are produced primarily by domestic and foreign contract manufacturers. These products are then warehoused and shipped from facilities in Compton, California and Gonzales, Louisiana.

Raw Materials

      The principal raw materials used in the manufacture of infant comforters, sheets and accessories are printed and solid color cotton and polycotton fabrics, with polyester fibers used as filling material. The principal raw materials used in the manufacture of throws and other products are natural-color and pre-dyed 100% cotton yarns, rayon yarns and acrylic yarns. The principal raw materials used in the production of infant bibs are knit-terry polycotton, woven polycotton and vinyl fabrics. Although the Company usually maintains supply relationships with only a limited number of suppliers, the Company believes these raw materials presently are available from several sources in quantities sufficient to meet the Company’s requirements.

      The Company uses significant quantities of cotton, either in the form of cotton fabric or polycotton fabric. Cotton is subject to ongoing price fluctuations. The price fluctuations are a result of cotton being an agricultural product subject to weather patterns, disease and other factors as well as supply and demand considerations, both domestically and internationally. Significant increases in the price of cotton could adversely affect the Company’s operations.

Seasonality, Inventory Management

      Historically, the Company has experienced a seasonal sales pattern, in which sales are lowest in the first fiscal quarter. In fiscal 2004, sales peaked in the fourth fiscal quarter and in fiscal 2002 and 2003, sales peaked in the second fiscal quarter.

      The Company carries normal inventory levels to meet delivery requirements of customers. Customer returns of merchandise shipped are historically approximately 0.6% of gross sales.

Order Backlog

      Management estimates the backlog of unfilled customer orders were $4.4 million and $3.4 million at March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003, respectively. The majority of these unfilled orders are shipped within approximately eight weeks, and none are expected to be shipped beyond the completion of the fiscal year ending March 27, 2005. Due to the prevalence of quick-ship programs adopted by its customers, the Company does not believe that its backlogs are a meaningful indicator of future business.

Trademarks, Copyrights and Patents

      The Company considers its trademarks to be of material importance to its business. Products are marketed in part under well-known trademarks such as Red Calliope®, Cuddle Me®, NoJo®, Hamco®, Pinky Baby® and Churchill Weavers®. Protection for these trademarks is obtained through domestic and foreign registrations.

      Certain products are manufactured and sold pursuant to licensing agreements for trademarks that include, among others, Disney®. The licensing agreements for the Company’s designer brands generally are for an initial term of one to five years, and may or may not be subject to renewal or extension. Sales of product under the Company’s licenses with Disney Enterprises, Inc. accounted for 33% of the Company’s total gross sales volume during fiscal 2004.

      Many of the designs used by the Company are copyrighted by other parties, including trademark licensors, and are available to the Company through copyright licenses. Other designs are the subject of copyrights and design patents owned by the Company.

      During the fiscal year ended March 28, 1999, the Company entered into licensing agreements with Calvin Klein, Inc. and Disney Enterprises, Inc. The Calvin Klein license granted the Company the right to produce

4

Table of Contents

      The Company’s aggregate commitment for minimum guaranteed royalty payments under all of its license agreements is $3.3 million, $0.2 million and $0 for fiscal 2005, 2006, and thereafter, respectively. The Company believes that future sales of royalty products will exceed amounts required to cover the minimum royalty guarantees. The Company’s total royalty expense, net of royalty income, was $5.7 million, $6.5 million and $7.5 million for fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Competition

      The infant consumer products industry is highly competitive. The Company competes with a variety of distributors and manufacturers on the basis of quality, design, price, service and packaging and is a leader in its respective industry segment. Its leadership results from the integration of extensive proprietary product design with low-cost, high-quality global sourcing to produce and market high-value merchandise to major customers. With a strong commitment to customer service, the Company develops distinctive programs for individual customers and maximizes retail productivity with aggressive pricing, quick replenishment merchandise management and efficient customer order execution. These qualities have enabled the Company to become the largest producer of infant bed coverings and bibs for distribution to mass and mid-tier merchants, enjoying approximately one-third of the infant bedding market share and one-half of the bib market share in the U.S.

Government Regulation, Environmental Control

      The Company is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations which regulate, among other things, the discharge, storage, handling and disposal of a variety of substances and wastes and to laws and regulations relating to employee safety and health, principally the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Act and regulations thereunder. The Company believes that it currently complies in all material respects with applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and that future compliance with such existing laws or regulations will not have a material adverse effect on its capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. However, there can be no assurances that such requirements will not become more stringent in the future or that the Company will not incur significant costs in the future to comply with such requirements.

Employees

      At March 28, 2004, the Company had approximately 241 employees, none of whom are represented by a labor union. The Company attracts and maintains qualified personnel by paying competitive salaries and benefits and offering opportunities for advancement. The Company considers its relationship with its employees to be good.

International Sales

      Sales to customers in foreign countries outside the United States are not currently material to the Company’s business.

Item 2.     Properties

      The Company’s headquarters are located in Gonzales, Louisiana. The Company rents approximately 17,211 square feet at this location under a lease that expires April 25, 2007.

5

Table of Contents

      The following table summarizes certain information regarding the Company’s principal properties.

      Management believes that its properties are suitable for the purposes for which they are used, are in generally good condition and provide adequate capacity for current and anticipated future operations. The Company’s business is somewhat seasonal so that during certain times of the year these facilities are fully utilized, while at other times of the year the Company has excess capacity.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

      From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings relating to claims arising in the ordinary course of its business. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to any such legal proceeding the outcome of which, individually or in the aggregate, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended March 28, 2004.

PART II

      The Company is authorized by its Articles of Incorporation to issue up to 75,000,000 shares of capital stock, 74,000,000 of which are designated common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 1,000,000 of which are designated preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.

Common Stock

      Effective April 10, 2001, the Company’s common stock was removed from the listing of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) as it fell below the minimum standards of market capitalization for continued listing by the NYSE. The common stock currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board with the ticker symbol

6

Table of Contents

      As of June 1, 2004 there were 9,504,937 shares of the company’s common Stock issued and outstanding held by approximately 726 registered holders and the closing stock price was $0.52. The Company has not paid a dividend since December 26, 1999 and has no plans to resume payment of dividends.

     Equity Compensation Plans

      The following table sets forth information regarding shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and other rights granted to employees, consultants or directors under all of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans, as of March 28, 2004.

Item 6.     Selected Financial Data

      The selected financial data presented below for the five years ended March 28, 2004 is from the Company’s financial statements. The data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

7

Table of Contents

Item 7.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

      The Company operates indirectly through its subsidiaries, Crown Crafts Infant Products, Inc., Hamco, Inc. and Churchill Weavers, Inc., primarily in the Infant Products segment within the Consumer Products industry. The Company’s offices are located in Huntington Beach and Compton, California; Gonzales, Louisiana; Berea, Kentucky and Rogers, Arkansas.

      The Infant Products segment consists of infant bedding, bibs, soft goods and accessories. The infant products are marketed under a variety of Company-owned trademarks, under trademarks licensed from others, without trademarks as unbranded merchandise and with customers’ private labels. The products are produced primarily by foreign contract manufacturers, then warehoused and shipped from facilities in Compton, California and Gonzales, Louisiana. Sales are generally made directly to retailers, primarily mass merchants, large chain stores and gift stores.

      The Company also produces hand-woven adult throws, adult scarves and infant blankets. Sales are generally made to major department stores, specialty shops and designer showrooms.

      The infant consumer products industry is highly competitive. The Company competes with a variety of distributors and manufacturers and believes that it is the largest producer of infant bed coverings and bibs, enjoying approximately one-third of the infant bedding market share and one-half of the infant bib market share within these segments. The Company competes on the basis of quality, design, price, service and packaging.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

      In response to changing business conditions in the consumer products industry, the Company made significant changes in its business operations over the last three years. In addition to a program of cost reductions and rationalization, the Company outsourced virtually all of its manufacturing to domestic and foreign contract manufacturers with the exception of the specialty hand wovens produced by Churchill Weavers and, until recently, screen-printed infant bibs produced by Burgundy in Mexico. The Woven Products division, with manufacturing primarily in north Georgia, was sold on November 14, 2000 and net proceeds of $32.3 million were used to reduce debt. Following the outsourcing of the Company’s adult bedding and bath products, the Company’s Roxboro, North Carolina plant was sold on June 14, 2001 and the proceeds of $8.0 million were used to reduce debt. Also, the Company made a decision to exit the adult bedding and bath business, and its net assets related to that business of $12.4 million were sold effective July 23, 2001. Proceeds of the sale were $8.5 million cash plus the assumption of liabilities of $3.4 million as well as the assumption of certain contingent liabilities. Cash from the sale was used to reduce debt. Following the sale of the adult bedding and bath business, the Company is now primarily in the infant and juvenile products business, but in describing the results of operations for fiscal 2002, reference is made to all of the product

8

Table of Contents

Restructuring Charge

      In December 2002, the Company adopted a formal plan to change its sourcing strategy for certain products and close the Mexican manufacturing facility operated by its majority-owned subsidiary, Burgundy. This decision was based on extensive research by management which indicated that, due to lower wages and the elimination of certain governmental quotas on the importation of bibs, outsourcing the supply of products then being manufactured by Burgundy to Asian manufacturers was more cost-effective and competitive than maintaining operations in Mexico. Under the plan, Burgundy continued to operate through the first quarter of fiscal 2004, at which time the Company began to liquidate Burgundy’s assets. As a result of the decision of the Company to discontinue its Mexican operations, the Company recorded a $1.8 million restructuring charge to operations in the quarter ended December 29, 2002, which consisted primarily of a write-down of the property and equipment at the Mexican facility of approximately $800,000, inventory items deemed to be in excess of production requirements of approximately $600,000, an accrual for contractual termination benefits of approximately $300,000 due Burgundy’s entire workforce (approximately 130 employees) under the provisions of Mexico’s labor regulations and the write-off of goodwill of approximately $60,000. The Company paid approximately $189,000 of the severance benefits in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and paid the remainder through October 2003. The Company continued to charge the ongoing operating costs associated with Burgundy’s production in the period in which the costs were incurred. The Company incurred a loss of approximately $85,000 related to the operation and closure of this facility for the three-month period ended June 29, 2003, at which time the closure was complete.

Results of Operations: Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003

      Net sales for fiscal 2004 decreased $8.5 million, or 9.0%, to $86.2 million from $94.7 million for fiscal 2003. Net sales of throws decreased $180,000, or 7.0%, to $2.4 million, as sales volumes of high-end luxury throws were negatively impacted for the first six months of the current year by the recent downturn in the economy. Net sales of infant and juvenile products decreased $8.3 million, or 9.0%, to $83.8 million. This decline in sales, which occurred primarily in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, is attributable to changes in buying patterns by several customers, some of whom lowered on-hand inventory levels in response to the sluggish economy, and changes in internal business strategies. Also, during fiscal year 2003, the Company shipped several new product placements to key customers, which were not repeated at the same levels in the current year. The Company’s Pillow Buddies® business has been comparatively weaker in the current year because retail dollars have not been allocated to the product and increased competition for character licenses has driven royalty commitments higher than management is comfortable guaranteeing.

      Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales remained level at 77.3% for fiscal 2004 compared to 77.4% for fiscal 2003. Although the Company’s gross margin benefited in the current fiscal year from improvements attributable to its sourcing efforts, most of the savings was passed on to customers as a result of pricing pressure.

      Marketing and administrative expenses decreased by $0.5 million, or 4.1%, in the current fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year and were 14.1% of net sales for the current fiscal year compared to 13.4% in the prior fiscal year. The Company achieved reductions in labor and commissions expenses in fiscal year 2004; however, these reductions were partially offset by costs related to the Company’s Delaware reincorporation of approximately $396,000.

      As discussed in Note 4 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company recorded a $1.8 million restructuring charge in the quarter ended December 29, 2002 related to the closure of the Company’s Mexican manufacturing facility.

      Interest expense for fiscal 2004 decreased by $0.5 million because of a lower average debt balance and reduced interest rates. As discussed in “Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources” below, the Company had $28.4 million in long-term debt at March 28, 2004 compared to $30.9 million at March 30,

9

Table of Contents

      Income tax expense for fiscal 2004 includes a benefit for a revision of federal alternative minimum taxes of $99,000 and an expense for state and local income taxes of $321,000. For fiscal 2003, the Company recorded income tax expense of $103,000 related to federal taxes, including alternative minimum taxes, and $161,000 related to estimated state and local taxes. Income tax expense for both periods was reduced by the utilization of a portion of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards.

Results of Operations: Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

      Total net sales for fiscal 2003 decreased $22.9 million, or 19.4%, to $94.7 million from $117.6 million for fiscal 2002. Net sales of bedroom and bath products decreased $19.9 million, or 100%, net sales of throws decreased $635,000, or 19.9%, to $2.6 million, and net sales of infant and juvenile products decreased $2.2 million, or 2.3%, to $92.2 million.

      The decrease in sales of bedroom and bath products was the result of the sale of the adult bedding and bath division on July 23, 2001. The decrease in sales of infant and juvenile products is primarily due to lost sales resulting from the West Coast port slowdown in September 2002 and the subsequent closure in October 2002 and lower reorders in ongoing business due to SKU reduction by certain major customers.

      In fiscal 2003, cost of sales decreased to 77.4% of net sales from 78.0% for fiscal 2002. The decrease relates primarily to changes in product mix as a result of the divestment referenced above.

      Marketing and administrative expenses decreased by $8.2 million, or 39.3%, in the current fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year and were 13.4% of net sales for the current fiscal year compared to 17.7% in the prior fiscal year. The decrease is a result of the divestment referenced above as well as the elimination of duplicate positions and locations.

      As discussed in Note 4 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company recorded a $1.8 million restructuring charge in the quarter ended December 29, 2002 related to the closure of the Company’s Mexican manufacturing facility.

      Interest expense for fiscal 2003 decreased by $2.4 million because of a lower average debt balance and reduced interest rates. As discussed in “Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources” below, the Company had $30.9 million in long-term debt at March 30, 2003 compared to $36.8 million at March 31, 2002. This $5.9 million decrease in debt includes payments totaling $3 million on senior notes and a decrease in the Company’s revolving credit facility of $3.7 million offset by an increase in debt related to the amortization of the discount discussed below and the issuance of a promissory note in the amount of $274,000 related to the payment of interest on the Company’s senior subordinated notes.

      Due to accumulated losses, the income tax provision for fiscal 2003 includes a provision for federal alternative minimum tax of $103,000, along with a provision for state income taxes of $161,000, for a total tax provision of $264,000. For fiscal 2002, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $1.9 million.

Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Net cash provided by operating activities was $3.2 million for the year ended March 28, 2004 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $6.8 million for the year ended March 30, 2003. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to the receipt of a one-time income tax refund of $1.8 million in the prior year and a $1.3 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the prior year. Net cash used by investing activities was $0.1 million in 2004 compared to net cash used by investing activities of $0.4 million in the prior year period. The decrease in cash used by investing activities was due in large part to net proceeds from the sale of assets disposed of in connection with the closure of

10

Table of Contents

      The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal, to pay the interest on or to refinance its maturing indebtedness, to fund capital expenditures or to comply with its debt covenants will depend upon future performance. The Company’s future performance is, to a certain extent, subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond its control. Based upon the current level of operations, the Company believes that cash flow from operations together with revolving credit availability will be adequate to meet liquidity needs.

      At March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003, long-term debt consisted of (in thousands):

      The Company’s existing credit facilities include the following:

11

Table of Contents

      These credit facilities contain covenants regarding minimum levels of Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”), maximum total debt to EBITDA, maximum senior debt to EBITDA, minimum EBITDA to cash interest and minimum shareholders’ equity. The bank facilities also place restrictions on the amounts the Company may expend on acquisitions and purchases of treasury stock and currently prohibit the payment of dividends.

      Minimum annual maturities are as follows (in thousands):

      As part of the Company’s refinancing of its credit facilities in July 2001, the Company issued to the lenders warrants for non-voting common stock that are convertible into common stock equivalent to 65% of the shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis at a price of 11.3 cents per share. The warrants are non-callable and expire in six years from their date of issuance. The value of the warrants of $2.4 million using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was credited to additional paid-in capital in the second quarter of fiscal 2002. The dilutive effect of these warrants on earnings per share for the fiscal periods ended March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003 was $0.18 per share and $0.15 per share, respectively. Also, in the second quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company recognized a gain of $25.0 million representing forgiveness of indebtedness income (net of $2.9 million of expenses incurred) in connection with the refinancing.

      To reduce its exposure to credit losses and to enhance its cash flow, the Company assigns the majority of its trade accounts receivable to a commercial factor. The Company’s factor establishes customer credit lines and accounts for and collects receivable balances. Under the terms of the factoring agreement, which expires in July, 2005, the factor remits payments to the Company on the average due date of each group of invoices assigned. If a customer fails to pay the factor on the due date, the Company is charged interest at the greater of 6% or prime, which was 4.00% at March 28, 2004, until payment is received. The factor bears credit losses with respect to assigned accounts receivable that are within approved credit limits. The Company bears losses resulting from returns, allowances, claims and discounts. The Company’s factor at any time may terminate or limit its approval of shipments to a particular customer. If such a termination occurs, the Company may either assume the credit risks for shipments after the date of such termination or cease shipments to such customer.

      The following table summarizes the maturity or expiration dates of mandatory financial obligations and commitments for the following periods.

12

Table of Contents

      Management does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on the Company’s operations. If inflation increases, the Company will attempt to increase its prices to offset its increased expenses. No assurance can be given, however, that the Company will be able to adequately increase its prices in response to inflation.

      During fiscal 2002, the Company incurred approximately $1.5 million in non-recurring charges related to the sale of the adult bedding and bath division in July, 2001, the sale of the woven products division in November, 2000, and the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters. These costs included $850,000 in wages and benefits (including severance) paid to temporary and terminated employees, $795,000 in operating expenses and $206,000 in data collection and transfer costs offset by $356,000 in vendor discounts and allowances.

Critical Accounting Policies

      While the listing below is not inclusive of all of the Company’s accounting policies, the Company’s management believes that the following policies are those which are most critical and embody the most significant management judgments due to the uncertainties affecting their application and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These critical policies are:

      Revenue Recognition: Sales are recorded when goods are shipped to customers, and are reported net of returns and allowances in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

      Sales Returns and Other Allowances and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Specifically, management must make estimates of potential future product returns related to current period product revenues. The Company’s sales arrangements do not generally include acceptance provisions or clauses. Additionally, the Company does not typically grant its distributors or other customers price protection rights or rights to return products bought, other than normal and customary rights of return for defects in materials or workmanship, and is not obligated to accept product returns for any other reason. Actual returns have not historically been significant. Management analyzes historical returns, current economic trends and changes in customer demand when evaluating the adequacy of its sales returns and other allowances.

      The Company factors the majority of its receivables. In the event a factored receivable becomes uncollectible due to credit worthiness, the factor bears the risk of loss. The Company’s management must make estimates of the uncollectibility of its non-factored accounts receivable. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in its customers’ payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company’s accounts receivable at March 28, 2004 totaled $17.2 million, net of allowances of $2.1 million.

      Inventory Valuation: The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires careful determination of the appropriate dollar amount of the Company’s inventory balances. Such amount is presented as a current asset in the Company’s balance sheet and is a direct determinant of cost of goods sold in the statement of operations and, therefore, has a significant impact on the amount of net income reported in an accounting period. The basis of accounting for inventories is cost, which is the sum of expenditures and charges, both direct and indirect, incurred to bring the inventory quantities to their existing condition and location. The Company’s inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, which assumes that inventory quantities are sold in the order in which they are manufactured or purchased. The Company utilizes standard costs as a management tool. The Company’s standard cost valuation of its inventories is adjusted at regular intervals to reflect the approximate cost of the inventory under FIFO. The determination of the indirect charges and their allocation to the Company’s work-in-process and finished goods inventories is complex and requires significant management judgment and estimates. Material differences may result in the valuation of the Company’s inventories and in the amount

13

Table of Contents

      On a periodic basis, management reviews its inventory quantities on hand for obsolescence, physical deterioration, changes in price levels and the existence of quantities on hand which may not reasonably be expected to be used or sold within the normal operating cycles of the Company’s operations. To the extent that any of these conditions are believed to exist or the utility of the inventory quantities in the ordinary course of business is no longer as great as their carrying value, an allowance against the inventory valuation is established. To the extent that this allowance is established or increased during an accounting period, an expense is recorded in the Company’s statement of operations in cost of goods sold. Significant management judgment is required in determining the amount and adequacy of this allowance. In the event that actual results differ from management’s estimates or these estimates and judgments are revised in future periods, the Company may need to establish additional allowances which could materially impact the Company’s financial position and results of operation.

      As of March 28, 2004, the Company’s inventories totaled $14.4 million, net of allowances for discontinued, irregular, slow moving and obsolete inventories of $1.0 million. Management believes that the Company’s inventory valuation results in carrying the inventory at lower of cost or market.

      Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which was adopted by the Company on April 2, 2001. Under SFAS 133, derivative instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value and changes in the fair value of such instruments are recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. At March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003 the Company had no derivative instruments.

      Provisions for Income Taxes: The provisions for income taxes include all currently payable federal, state and local taxes that are based upon the Company’s taxable income and the change during the fiscal year in net deferred income tax assets and liabilities. The Company provides for deferred income taxes based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance, if necessary, in the amount of any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

      Valuation of Long-Lived Assets, Identifiable Intangibles and Goodwill: The Company reviews for impairment long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any asset may not be recoverable. In the event of impairment, the asset is written down to its fair market value. Assets to be disposed of are recorded at the lower of net book value or fair market value less cost to sell at the date management commits to a plan of disposal and are classified as assets held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet.

      Goodwill, which represents the unamortized excess of purchase price over fair value of net identifiable assets acquired in business combinations, was amortized through March 31, 2002 using the straight-line method over periods of up to 30 years. As discussed below, the Company discontinued amortization of goodwill effective April 1, 2002. The Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill annually and if facts and circumstances suggest that the asset may be impaired. Impairment of goodwill and write-downs, if any, are measured based on estimates of future cash flows. Goodwill is stated net of accumulated amortization of $6.3 million at March 28, 2004, March 30, 2003 and March 31, 2002. Net intangible assets, long-lived assets and goodwill, including property and equipment, amounted to $24.8 million as of March 28, 2004.

      As discussed below, on April 1, 2002, the Company implemented SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and as a result, the Company discontinued amortizing approximately $23.0 million of goodwill but continued to amortize other long-lived intangible assets. Goodwill amortization expense recorded during 2002 amounted to approximately $1.1 million. In lieu of amortization, the Company is required to perform an annual impairment review of its goodwill. The Company has performed a transitional fair value

14

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

      In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 requires business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and eliminates the use of the pooling-of-interests method. The application of SFAS 141 did not affect any of the Company’s previously reported amounts included in goodwill or other intangible assets. SFAS 142 requires that the amortization of goodwill cease prospectively upon adoption and that instead the carrying value of goodwill be evaluated using an impairment approach. Identifiable intangible assets continue to be amortized over their useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of. SFAS 142 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and was implemented by the Company on April 1, 2002. Beginning in fiscal 2003, the Company discontinued amortizing goodwill but continues to amortize other long-lived intangible assets. The Company performed fair value based impairment tests on its goodwill in accordance with SFAS 142 and determined that the fair value exceeded the recorded value at April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2003. Following is a reconciliation of previously reported net income and basic and diluted net income per share to the amounts that would have been reported if SFAS 142 had been effective as of April 2, 2001 and the amortization of goodwill had been discontinued as of that date.

      In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Although SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of, it retains most of the concepts of that standard, except that it eliminates the requirement that goodwill be allocated to long-lived assets for impairment testing purposes and it requires that a long-lived asset to be abandoned or exchanged for a similar asset be considered held and used until it is disposed of (i.e., the depreciable life should be revised until the asset is actually abandoned or exchanged). Also, SFAS 144 includes the basic provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for presentation of discontinued operations in the income statement but broadens that presentation to include a component of an entity rather than a segment of a business, where that component can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the entity. SFAS 144 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and was implemented by the Company on April 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 144 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements on the date of adoption.

      In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS 145 provides, among other things, that gains on the extinguishments of debt will generally no longer be classified as extraordinary items in the

15

Table of Contents

      In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which was effective for transactions initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with restructurings, discontinued operations, plant closings, or other exit or disposal activities, when incurred rather than at the date a plan is committed to. The adoption of FAS 146 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements on the date of adoption.

      In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. SFAS 148 amends FASB 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, FASB 148 amends the disclosure requirements of FASB 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS 148 was effective for the Company’s fiscal period ended March 30, 2003. The Company adopted this standard on that date and determined that it would continue to utilize the intrinsic method of accounting and included the additional disclosures in the current period financial statements.

Forward-Looking Information

      This annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon management’s current expectations, projections, estimates and assumptions. Words such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates” and variations of such words and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause future results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. These risks include, among others, general economic conditions, changing competition, the level and pricing of future orders from the Company’s customers, the Company’s dependence upon third-party suppliers, including some located in foreign countries with unstable political situations, the Company’s ability to successfully implement new information technologies and the Company’s dependence upon licenses from third parties.

Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

      The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on debt, changes in commodity prices, the concentration of the Company’s customers and the Company’s reliance upon licenses. The exposure to interest rate risk relates to floating rate debt, $1.5 million of which was outstanding at March 28, 2004 compared to $1.8 million at March 30, 2003. Each 1.0 percentage point increase in interest rates would impact pretax earnings by $15,000 at the debt level of March 28, 2004 and $18,000 at the debt level of March 30, 2003. The exposure to commodity price risk primarily relates to changes in the price of cotton, which is a principal raw material in a substantial number of the Company’s products. Additionally, the Company’s top three customers represent 75% of net sales, and 49% of the Company’s net sales is of licensed products. The Company could be materially impacted by the loss of one or more of these customers or licenses.

Item 8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

      See pages 24 and F-1 through F-18 hereof.

16

Table of Contents

Item 9.     Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

      The Company has neither changed its independent accountants nor had any disagreements on accounting or financial disclosure with such accountants.

Item 9A.     Controls and Procedures

      The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report, as required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act. Since such evaluation, there have not been any significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect such controls.

PART III

      The information with respect to the Company’s directors and executive officers is set forth in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers” and is incorporated herein by reference. The information with respect to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and is incorporated herein by reference. The information with respect to Item 406 of Regulation S-K is set forth in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Code of Ethics” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.     Executive Compensation

      The information set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

      The information set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

      The information set forth under the caption “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.     Principal Accountant Fees and Services

      The information set forth under the captions “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” “All Other Fees,” and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

17

Table of Contents

PART IV

(a)1. Financial Statements

      The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are filed with this report and included in Part II, Item 8:

(a)2. Financial Statement Schedule

      The following financial statement schedule of the Company is filed with this report:

      All other schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

18

Table of Contents

CROWN CRAFTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

SCHEDULE II

19

Table of Contents

(a)3. Exhibits

      Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are included as Exhibits to this report as follows:

20

Table of Contents

21

Table of Contents

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

      The Company filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 28, 2004:

22

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

23

Table of Contents

Item 8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

24

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Crown Crafts, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 28, 2004. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 28, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

      As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in the year ended March 30, 2003.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana

F-1

Table of Contents

CROWN CRAFTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS