CTS CORP - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007.
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
Transition Period from _______________ to _______________
Commission
File Number: 1-4639
CTS
CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Indiana
|
|
35-0225010
|
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
905
West Boulevard North, Elkhart, IN
|
|
46514
|
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: 574-293-7511
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition
of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer x Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of October 19, 2007: 35,202,358.
|
Page
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
||
|
-
For the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 and October
1,
2006
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
||
|
-
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
||
|
-
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1,
2006
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
||
|
-
For the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2007 and October
1,
2006
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
28
|
|
Item
1A.
|
28
|
||
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
29
|
||
|
Item
6.
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
(In
thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
174,790
|
$ |
165,676
|
$ |
507,672
|
$ |
482,094
|
||||||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
140,997
|
136,571
|
410,597
|
391,180
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
19,821
|
16,320
|
62,031
|
51,932
|
||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
4,055
|
3,775
|
12,277
|
11,937
|
||||||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
—
|
486
|
—
|
3,368
|
||||||||||||
Operating
earnings
|
9,917
|
8,524
|
22,767
|
23,677
|
||||||||||||
Other
(expense) income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(869 | ) | (803 | ) | (2,241 | ) | (2,948 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
497
|
199
|
1,462
|
522
|
||||||||||||
Other
|
320
|
231
|
474
|
293
|
||||||||||||
Total
other expense
|
(52 | ) | (373 | ) | (305 | ) | (2,133 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings before
income taxes
|
9,865
|
8,151
|
22,462
|
21,544
|
||||||||||||
Income
tax expense — Note I
|
2,071
|
1,904
|
4,717
|
4,998
|
||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ |
7,794
|
$ |
6,247
|
$ |
17,745
|
$ |
16,546
|
||||||||
Net
earnings per share — Note H
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ |
0.22
|
$ |
0.17
|
$ |
0.50
|
$ |
0.46
|
||||||||
Diluted
|
$ |
0.20
|
$ |
0.16
|
$ |
0.46
|
$ |
0.43
|
||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per share
|
$ |
0.03
|
$ |
0.03
|
$ |
0.09
|
$ |
0.09
|
||||||||
Average
common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
35,481
|
35,861
|
35,709
|
35,841
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
39,956
|
40,266
|
40,222
|
40,215
|
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
(dollars
in thousands)
September
30, 2007
|
December
31, 2006*
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|
|
||||||
Current
Assets
|
|
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
44,956
|
$ |
38,630
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowances (2007 - $1,486; 2006 - $2,139)
|
102,707
|
106,012
|
||||||
Inventories,
net — Note C
|
72,537
|
60,543
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
23,624
|
22,435
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
243,824
|
227,620
|
||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation (2007 -
$268,233; 2006 - $259,548)
|
91,391
|
96,468
|
||||||
Other
Assets
|
||||||||
Prepaid
pension asset — Note E
|
107,365
|
100,666
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
24,657
|
24,657
|
||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
36,816
|
39,154
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes — Note I
|
32,592
|
37,401
|
||||||
Other
|
1,417
|
1,867
|
||||||
Total
other assets
|
202,847
|
203,745
|
||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ |
538,062
|
$ |
527,833
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$ |
1,934
|
$ |
5,425
|
||||
Current
portion of long-term debt — Note D
|
—
|
186
|
||||||
Accounts
payable
|
84,445
|
78,205
|
||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
41,980
|
41,865
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
128,359
|
125,681
|
||||||
Long-term
debt — Note D
|
60,000
|
60,635
|
||||||
Other
long-term obligations
|
20,081
|
22,494
|
||||||
Shareholders’
Equity
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock – authorized 25,000,000 shares without par value; none
issued
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Common
stock — authorized 75,000,000 shares without par value; 53,911,117
shares issued at 2007 and 53,718,801 shares issued at 2006
|
278,821
|
276,553
|
||||||
Additional
contributed capital
|
27,789
|
27,899
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
329,911
|
315,370
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(28,381 | ) | (31,283 | ) | ||||
608,140
|
588,539
|
|||||||
Cost
of common stock held in treasury (18,603,959 shares at 2007 and 17,895,708
shares at 2006) — Note J
|
(278,518 | ) | (269,516 | ) | ||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
329,622
|
319,023
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$ |
538,062
|
$ |
527,833
|
||||
*The
balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from
the audited financial
statements at that date.
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
(In
thousands of dollars)
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ |
17,745
|
$ |
16,546
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
16,977
|
19,043
|
||||||
Prepaid
pension asset
|
(6,699 | ) | (4,697 | ) | ||||
Equity-based
compensation
|
2,526
|
2,960
|
||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
—
|
3,368
|
||||||
Loss/(gain)
on sales of assets
|
50
|
(2,124 | ) | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(413 | ) |
—
|
|||||
Amortization
of retirement benefit adjustments
|
3,188
|
—
|
||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
3,305
|
(10,863 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
(11,994 | ) | (6,243 | ) | ||||
Other
current assets
|
(708 | ) | (4,860 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
7,826
|
13,963
|
||||||
Other
|
(568 | ) |
1,397
|
|||||
Total
adjustments
|
13,490
|
11,944
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
31,235
|
28,490
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(9,295 | ) | (11,108 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales of assets
|
39
|
14,453
|
||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(9,256 | ) |
3,345
|
|||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Payments
of long-term debt
|
(7,857 | ) | (81,562 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from borrowings of long-term debt
|
7,000
|
73,850
|
||||||
Payments
of short-term notes payable
|
(43,756 | ) | (102,078 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from borrowings of short-term notes payable
|
40,265
|
98,237
|
||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(3,204 | ) | (3,227 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(8,922 | ) | (946 | ) | ||||
Other
|
303
|
(149 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(16,171 | ) | (15,875 | ) | ||||
Effect
of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
518
|
1,734
|
||||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
6,326
|
17,694
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
38,630
|
12,029
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ |
44,956
|
$ |
29,723
|
||||
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ |
1,437
|
$ |
2,249
|
||||
Income
taxes—net
|
$ |
1,953
|
$ |
3,123
|
||||
See
notes
to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
(In
thousands of dollars)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ |
7,794
|
$ |
6,247
|
$ |
17,745
|
$ |
16,546
|
||||||||
Other
comprehensive earnings:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
457
|
932
|
1,007
|
2,915
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
of retirement benefit adjustments
(net of tax)
|
625
|
—
|
1,895
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Comprehensive
earnings
|
$ |
8,876
|
$ |
7,179
|
$ |
20,647
|
$ |
19,461
|
See
notes
to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
September
30, 2007
NOTE
A—Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been
prepared by CTS Corporation (CTS or the Company), without audit, pursuant to
the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the
financial statements, notes thereto, and other information included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements
reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring items) necessary for a fair statement, in all material respects,
of
the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported
period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results for the entire year.
Certain
reclassifications have been made for the periods presented in the consolidated
financial statements to conform to the classifications adopted in
2007.
NOTE
B—Equity-Based Compensation
Effective
January 1, 2006, CTS adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board’s (FASB) Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) No. 123(R),
“Share-Based Payment.” FAS No. 123(R) requires that CTS recognize
expense related to the fair value of equity-based compensation awards in the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings.
At
September 30, 2007, CTS had five equity-based compensation plans: the
1988 Restricted Stock and Cash Bonus Plan (1988 Plan), the 1996 Stock Option
Plan (1996 Plan), the 2001 Stock Option Plan (2001 Plan), the Nonemployee
Directors’ Stock Retirement Plan (Directors’ Plan), and the 2004 Omnibus
Long-Term Incentive Plan (2004 Plan). As of December 2004, additional
grants can only be made under the 2004 Plan. CTS believes that
equity-based awards align the interest of employees with those of its
shareholders.
The
2004
Plan, and previously the 1996 Plan and 2001 Plan, provides for grants of
incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options to officers, key
employees, and nonemployee members of CTS’ board of directors. In
addition, the 2004 Plan allows for grants of stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units,
and other equity awards.
The
following table summarizes the compensation expense included in the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the three and nine-month
periods ending September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006 relating to equity-based
compensation plans:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
October
1,
2006
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
October
1,
2006
|
|
||||
Stock
options (1)
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
$
|
318
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
Restricted
stock units
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
1,856
|
|
Restricted
stock
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
166
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
$
|
2,960
|
|
(1)
|
Stock
option expense includes $3 and $10 in the quarters ending
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, respectively, and $11 and
$35 for
the nine-month periods ending September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively, related to non-employee director stock
options.
|
_______________________
The
following table summarizes plan status as of September 30, 2007:
|
2004
Plan
|
2001
Plan
|
1996
Plan
|
|||||||||
Awards
originally available
|
6,500,000
|
2,000,000
|
1,200,000
|
|||||||||
Stock
options outstanding
|
313,850
|
846,938
|
290,050
|
|||||||||
Restricted
stock units outstanding
|
581,878
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Awards
exercisable
|
160,863
|
808,004
|
290,050
|
|||||||||
Awards
available for grant
|
5,300,456
|
—
|
—
|
Stock
Options
Stock
options are exercisable in cumulative annual installments over a maximum 10-year
period, commencing at least one year from the date of
grant. Stock options are generally granted with an exercise
price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of
grant. The stock options generally vest over four years and have a
10-year contractual life. The awards generally contain provisions to
either accelerate vesting or allow vesting to continue on schedule upon
retirement if certain service and age requirements are met. The
awards also provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control
event.
The
Company estimates the fair value of the stock option on the grant date using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and assumptions for expected price
volatility, option term, risk-free interest rate, and dividend
yield. Expected price volatilities are based on historical
volatilities of the Company’s stock. The expected option term is
derived from historical data on exercise behavior. The range of
option terms shown below results from certain groups of employees exhibiting
different behavior. The dividend yield is based on historical
dividend payments. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant.
A
summary
of the status of stock options as of September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
and
changes during the nine-month periods then ended, is presented
below:
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||
|
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
1,529,863
|
$ |
15.91
|
1,567,499
|
$ |
15.93
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
—
|
—
|
93,000
|
13.68
|
||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(42,900 | ) |
8.74
|
(37,624 | ) |
8.53
|
||||||||||
Expired
|
(20,400 | ) |
26.79
|
(52,150 | ) |
23.07
|
||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(15,725 | ) |
12.29
|
(8,950 | ) |
9.43
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of period
|
1,450,838
|
$ |
16.01
|
1,561,775
|
$ |
15.76
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Exercisable
at end of period
|
1,258,917
|
$ |
16.54
|
1,220,275
|
$ |
16.94
|
The
total
intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006 was $209,363 and $183,000,
respectively. The exercise price of options granted during the
nine-month period ending October 1, 2006 equaled the trading price of the
Company’s stock on the grant date. There were no options granted
during the nine-month period ending September 30, 2007.
A
summary
of the weighted-average remaining contractual term and aggregate intrinsic
value
of options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2007 is presented
below:
Weighted-average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in
thousands)
|
|
Options
outstanding
|
5.08
years
|
$2,864
|
Options
exercisable
|
4.76
years
|
$2,697
|
A
summary
of the nonvested stock options as of September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
and
changes during the nine-month periods then ended, is presented
below:
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||
|
Options
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
Options
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
Nonvested
at beginning of year
|
340,900
|
$ |
6.11
|
488,943
|
$ |
5.35
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
—
|
—
|
93,000
|
6.53
|
||||||||||||
Vested
|
(166,588 | ) |
5.69
|
(231,493 | ) |
4.74
|
||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(15,725 | ) |
7.58
|
(8,950 | ) |
4.52
|
||||||||||
Nonvested
at end of period
|
158,587
|
(1) | $ |
6.41
|
341,500
|
$ |
6.11
|
(1)
Based on
historical experience, CTS currently expects all of these options to
vest.
_____________________
The
total
fair value of shares vested during the nine-months ended September 30, 2007
and
October 1, 2006 was approximately $947,886 and $1,097,277
respectively. As of September 30, 2007, there was $218,276 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock
options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.2 years. CTS recognizes expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately
vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple
awards.
The
following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted-Average
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Range
of
|
Number
|
Remaining
|
Weighted-Average
|
Number
|
Weighted-Average
|
||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Outstanding
|
Contractual
|
Exercise
|
Exercisable
|
Exercise
|
||||||||||||||||
Prices
|
at
9/30/07
|
Life
(Years)
|
Price
|
at
9/30/07
|
Price
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
7.70
– 11.11
|
814,613
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
|
|
723,876
|
$
|
9.20
|
|||||
|
13.68
– 16.24
|
227,800
|
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
14.12
|
|
|
|
126,616
|
|
14.33
|
|||||
|
23.00
– 33.63
|
306,675
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
24.62
|
|
|
|
306,675
|
|
24.62
|
|||||
|
35.97
– 79.25
|
101,750
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
47.12
|
|
|
|
101,750
|
|
47.12
|
Service-Based
Restricted Stock Units
Service-based
restricted stock units (RSUs) entitle the holder to receive one share of common
stock for each unit when the unit vests. RSUs are issued to officers
and key employees as compensation. Generally, the RSUs vest over a
five-year period. A summary of the status of RSUs as of September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006, and changes during the nine-month periods then ended
is presented below:
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||
|
RSUs
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
RSUs
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
658,938
|
$ |
12.43
|
525,898
|
$ |
11.49
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
192,950
|
12.18
|
236,700
|
13.67
|
||||||||||||
Settled
|
(211,987 | ) |
12.75
|
(100,110 | ) |
11.23
|
||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(58,023 | ) |
12.46
|
(22,570 | ) |
11.34
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of period
|
581,878
|
$ |
12.23
|
639,918
|
$ |
12.11
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average
remaining contractual life
|
4.6
years
|
4.2 years
|
As of September 30, 2007, there was $3.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years. CTS recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards.
Performance-Based
Restricted Stock Units
During
the first quarter of 2007, CTS established performance-based restricted stock
unit awards for certain executives. Executives will receive between
0% to 200% of their target awards based on achievement of year-over-year sales
growth and free cash flow performance goals for fiscal year
2007. Restricted stock unit awards will be made in 2008 following a
determination of the extent to which performance goals were
achieved. Each performance-based restricted stock unit will cliff
vest and convert to one share of CTS common stock three years after the end
of
the 2007 fiscal year. CTS intends to review its assumptions
about the level of performance goal achievement on a quarterly basis and to
adjust the related compensation expense accordingly. CTS recorded
compensation expense of approximately $23,000 related to performance-based
restricted stock units during the nine-months ending September 30,
2007.
Market-Based
Restricted Stock Units
In
July
2007, CTS established a market-based restricted stock unit award for an
executive officer. An aggregate of 25,000 units may be earned in
performance years ending in the following three consecutive years on the
anniversary of the award date. Vesting will occur, if at all, at a
rate of 0 -150% of the target award on the end date of each performance period
and is tied exclusively to CTS total stockholder return relative to 32
enumerated peer group total stockholder return rates. The vesting
rate will be determined using a matrix based on a percentile ranking of CTS
total stockholder return with peer group total shareholder
return. CTS recorded compensation expense of approximately $9,000
related to market-based restricted stock units during the nine-months ending
September 30, 2007.
Restricted
Stock and Cash Bonus Plan
CTS’
1988
Plan originally reserved 2,400,000 shares of CTS’ common stock for sale at
market price, or award, to key employees. Under the 1988 Plan, 11,600
shares of Restricted Stock were outstanding as of September 30,
2007. Shares sold or awarded are subject to restrictions against
transfer and repurchase rights of CTS. In general, restrictions lapse
at the rate of 20% per year beginning one year from the grant
date. In addition, the 1988 Plan provides for a cash bonus to the
participant equal to the fair market value of shares on the dates restrictions
lapse, in the case of an award. The total bonus paid to any
participant during the restricted period is limited to twice the fair market
value of the shares on the date of award. As of September 30, 2007, there was
$55,700 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested Restricted
Stock. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 0.6 years. CTS recognizes expense on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the
award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards.
Stock
Retirement Plan
The
Directors’ Plan provides for a portion of the total compensation payable to
nonemployee directors to be deferred and paid in CTS stock. The
Directors’ Plan was frozen effective December 1, 2004. All future
grants will be from the 2004 Plan.
NOTE
C—Inventories, net
Inventories
consist of the following:
($
in thousands)
|
September
30, 2007
|
December
31,
2006
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
$ |
10,736
|
$ |
12,336
|
||||
Work-in-process
|
16,929
|
15,059
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
44,872
|
33,148
|
||||||
Total
inventories
|
$ |
72,537
|
$ |
60,543
|
NOTE
D—Debt
Long-term
debt was comprised of the following:
($
in thousands)
|
September
30, 2007
|
December
31,
2006
|
||||||
Revolving
credit agreement, weighted-average interest rate of 6.2%, due in
2011
|
$ |
—
|
$ |
—
|
||||
Convertible,
senior subordinated debentures at a weighted-average interest rate
of
2.125%, due in 2024
|
60,000
|
60,000
|
||||||
Term
loan, weighted-average interest rate of 8.0% (2007) and 7.3% (2006),
due
in 2011
|
—
|
821
|
||||||
|
60,000
|
60,821
|
||||||
Less
current maturities
|
—
|
186
|
||||||
Total
long-term debt
|
$ |
60,000
|
$ |
60,635
|
On
June
27, 2006, CTS entered into a $100 million, unsecured revolving credit
agreement. Under the terms of the revolving credit agreement, CTS can
expand the credit facility to $150 million. There were no amounts
outstanding under the revolving credit agreement at September 30, 2007 or
December 31, 2006. Interest rates on the revolving credit agreement
fluctuate based upon LIBOR and the Company’s quarterly total leverage
ratio. CTS pays a commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the
revolving credit agreement. The commitment fee varies based on the
quarterly leverage ratio and was 0.15 percent per annum at September 30,
2007. The revolving credit agreement requires, among other things,
that CTS comply with a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio. Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could
reduce the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
agreement. CTS was in compliance with all debt covenants at September
30, 2007.
Additionally,
the revolving credit agreement contains restrictions relating to the amount
of
secured debt the Company can have outstanding, the amounts allowed for
acquisitions or asset sales and the amounts allowed for stock repurchases and
dividend payments. The revolving credit agreement expires in June
2011.
CTS
has
$60 million convertible senior subordinated debentures (2.125% Debentures).
These debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 2.125%, payable semiannually
on May 1 and November 1 of each year through the maturity date of May 1, 2024.
The 2.125% Debentures are convertible, under certain circumstances, into CTS
common stock at a conversion price of $15.00 per share (which is equivalent
to
an initial conversion rate of approximately 66.6667 shares per $1,000 principal
amount of the notes). Upon conversion of the 2.125% Debentures, in lieu of
delivering common stock, the Company may, at its discretion, deliver cash or
a
combination of cash and common stock.
The
conversion price of the 2.125% Debentures will be adjusted if CTS completes
certain transactions, including: distribution of shares as a dividend to
substantially all shareholders; subdivision, combination or reclassification
of
its common stock; distribution of stock purchase warrants to substantially
all
shareholders; distribution of cash, stock or property to shareholders in excess
of $0.03 per share; or purchase of its common stock pursuant to a
tender offer or exchange offer under certain circumstances.
Holders
may convert the 2.125% Debentures at any time during a conversion period if
the
closing price of CTS common stock is more than 120% of the conversion price
($18.00 per share) for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the first trading day of the conversion period. The
conversion periods begin on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15
of
each year. Holders may also convert the notes if certain corporate transactions
occur. As of September 30, 2007, none of the conditions for conversion of the
2.125% million Debentures were satisfied.
CTS
may,
at its option, redeem all or a portion of the 2.125% Debentures for cash at
any
time on or after May 1, 2009, at a redemption price equal to the principal
amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest at the redemption
date.
Holders may require CTS to purchase for cash all or part of their notes on
May
1, 2009, 2014, and 2019, or upon the occurrence of certain events, at 100%
of
the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but
not including, the date of purchase.
As
of
December 31, 2006, the Company also had an $0.8 million (denominated in Thai
Baht) outstanding term loan that was assumed in connection with the acquisition
of SMTEK. The loan was secured by machinery and equipment of the
Thailand Manufacturing facility and was repaid by CTS in March
2007.
During
the nine-months ended September 30, 2007, CTS paid down its foreign lines of
credit, classified as short-term notes payable, through normal cash flow
generation.
NOTE
E—Retirement Plans
Effective
December 31, 2006, CTS adopted all of the provisions of FAS No. 158, “Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).” FAS No.
158 requires employers to: a) recognize the funded status of a benefit
plan—measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the
benefit obligation—in its statement of financial position, b) recognize as a
component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and
prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not
recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to FAS No. 87,
“Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” or FAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” c) measure defined
benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal
year-end statement of financial position, and d) disclose in the notes to
financial statements additional information about certain effects on net
periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed
recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and
transition asset or obligation. As required by the standard, CTS has applied
these FAS No. 158 requirements prospectively.
Net
pension (income)/postretirement expense for the three and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006 includes the following
components:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
||||||||||||
PENSION
PLANS
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ |
1,215
|
$ |
1,283
|
$ |
3,637
|
$ |
3,839
|
||||||||
Interest
cost
|
3,005
|
3,020
|
9,003
|
9,049
|
||||||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets (1)
|
(6,346 | ) | (6,188 | ) | (19,026 | ) | (18,547 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
224
|
135
|
674
|
404
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
of (gain)/loss
|
835
|
645
|
2,513
|
1,933
|
||||||||||||
Curtailment
loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
325
|
||||||||||||
Net
pension income
|
$ | (1,067 | ) | $ | (1,105 | ) | $ | (3,199 | ) | $ | (2,997 | ) |
(1) Expected
return on plan assets is net of expected investment expenses and certain
administrative expenses.
__________________
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
||||||||||||
OTHER
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ |
5
|
$ |
5
|
$ |
16
|
$ |
14
|
||||||||
Interest
cost
|
83
|
75
|
250
|
224
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
1
|
—
|
1
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
of (gain)/loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Curtailment
gain
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(81 | ) | |||||||||||
Net
postretirement expense
|
$ |
89
|
$ |
80
|
$ |
267
|
$ |
157
|
CTS
recognized a pension plan curtailment loss of approximately $0.3 million in
2006
and a postretirement benefit plan curtailment gain of approximately $0.1 million
in 2006, due to reduced employment levels. Also, effective April 1,
2006, CTS closed one of its U.S. defined benefit plans to new
participants.
NOTE
F—Segments
FAS
No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information,” requires companies to provide certain information about their
operating segments. CTS has two reportable segments: 1) Electronics
Manufacturing Services (EMS) and 2) Components and Sensors.
EMS
includes the higher level assembly of electronic and mechanical components
into
a finished subassembly or assembly performed under a contract manufacturing
agreement with an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or other contract
manufacturer. Additionally, for some customers, CTS provides full
turnkey manufacturing and completion including design, bill-of-material
management, logistics, and repair.
Components
and sensors are products which perform specific electronic functions for a
given
product family and are intended for use in customer assemblies. Components
and sensors consist principally of automotive sensors and actuators used in
commercial or consumer vehicles; electronic components used in communications
infrastructure and computer markets; terminators, including ClearONE™
terminators, used in computer and other high speed applications, switches,
resistor networks, and potentiometers used to serve multiple
markets.
The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described
in the summary of significant accounting policies in the Company’s annual report
on Form 10-K. Management evaluates performance based upon segment
operating earnings before restructuring and related charges, interest expense,
other non-operating income, and income tax expense.
Summarized
financial information concerning CTS’ reportable segments is shown in the
following table:
($
in thousands)
|
|
EMS
|
|
|
Components
and Sensors
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|||
Third
Quarter of 2007
|
|
|||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$
|
106,000
|
$
|
68,790
|
$
|
174,790
|
|
|||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
3,952
|
5,965
|
9,917
|
|
||||||||
Total
assets
|
170,722
|
367,340
|
538,062
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
Quarter of 2006
|
|
|||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$
|
100,832
|
$
|
64,844
|
$
|
165,676
|
|
|||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
3,598
|
5,666
|
9,264
|
|
||||||||
Total
assets
|
169,403
|
392,310
|
561,713
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Nine Months of 2007
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$
|
298,559
|
$
|
209,113
|
$
|
507,672
|
||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
6,309
|
16,458
|
22,767
|
|||||||||
Total
assets
|
170,722
|
367,340
|
538,062
|
|||||||||
First
Nine Months of 2006
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$
|
277,927
|
$
|
204,167
|
$
|
482,094
|
||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
3,424
|
24,577
|
28,001
|
|||||||||
Total
assets
|
169,403
|
392,310
|
561,713
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling
information between reportable segments’ operating earnings and CTS’
consolidated pre-tax income is shown in the following table:
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
September
30,
2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
||||||||||||
Total
segment operating earnings
|
$ |
9,917
|
$ |
9,264
|
$ |
22,767
|
$ |
28,001
|
||||||||
Restructuring
and related charges - Components and Sensors
|
—
|
(265 | ) |
—
|
(3,849 | ) | ||||||||||
Restructuring
charge – EMS
|
—
|
(475 | ) |
—
|
(475 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(869 | ) | (803 | ) | (2,241 | ) | (2,948 | ) | ||||||||
Other
income
|
817
|
430
|
1,936
|
815
|
||||||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
$ |
9,865
|
$ |
8,151
|
$ |
22,462
|
$ |
21,544
|
NOTE
G—Contingencies
Certain
processes in the manufacture of CTS’ current and past products create hazardous
waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and
regulations. CTS has been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator groups,
that
it is or may be a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) regarding hazardous
waste remediation at several non-CTS sites. In addition to these non-CTS
sites, CTS has an ongoing practice of providing reserves for probable
remediation activities at certain of its manufacturing locations and for claims
and proceedings against CTS with respect to other environmental matters.
In the opinion of management, based upon presently available information
relating to all such matters, either adequate provision for probable costs
has
been made, or the ultimate costs resulting will not materially affect the
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of
CTS.
Certain
claims are pending against CTS with respect to matters arising out of the
ordinary conduct of its business. For all claims, in the opinion of
management, based upon presently available information, either adequate
provision for anticipated costs has been made or the ultimate anticipated costs
resulting will not materially affect CTS’ consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE
H—Earnings Per Share
FAS
No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” requires companies to provide a
reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS) computations. The calculations below provide net
earnings, average common shares outstanding, and the resultant earnings per
share for both basic and diluted EPS for the three and nine-month periods ending
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006.
($
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Net
Earnings
(Numerator)
|
Shares
(in
thousands) (Denominator)
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||||
Third
Quarter 2007
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ |
7,794
|
35,481
|
$ |
0.22
|
|||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||
Convertible
debt
|
251
|
4,000
|
||||||||||
Equity-based
compensation plans
|
—
|
475
|
||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ |
8,045
|
39,956
|
$ |
0.20
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
Third
Quarter 2006
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ |
6,247
|
35,861
|
$ |
0.17
|
|||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||
Convertible
debt
|
240
|
4,000
|
||||||||||
Equity-based
compensation plans
|
405
|
|||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ |
6,487
|
40,266
|
$ |
0.16
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
First
Nine Months of 2007
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ |
17,745
|
35,709
|
$ |
0.50
|
|||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||
Convertible
debt
|
753
|
4,000
|
||||||||||
Equity-based
compensation plans
|
—
|
513
|
||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ |
18,498
|
40,222
|
$ |
0.46
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
First
Nine Months of 2006
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ |
16,546
|
35,841
|
$ |
0.46
|
|||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||
Convertible
debt
|
724
|
4,000
|
||||||||||
Equity-based
compensation plans
|
374
|
|||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ |
17,270
|
40,215
|
$ |
0.43
|
The
following table shows the potentially dilutive securities which have been
excluded from the three and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006 dilutive earnings per share calculation because they are either
anti-dilutive, or the exercise price exceeds the average market
price.
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
(Number
of Shares in Thousands)
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
||||||||||||
Stock
options where the assumed proceeds exceeds the average
market price
|
636
|
701
|
609
|
750
|
||||||||||||
Securities
related to the 6.5% Debentures (1)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
159
|
(1)
The 6.5%
convertible, subordinated debentures were repaid in June 2006.
________________
NOTE
I – Income Taxes
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty
in income tax positions recognized in accordance with FAS No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 requires that an enterprise must
determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be
sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or
litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. A tax
position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured to
determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial
statements.
At
the
date of adoption, CTS had approximately $4.3 million of unrecognized tax
benefits, which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax
rate. Of this amount, approximately $3.6 million was reclassified
from current tax liabilities to a reduction of the long-term deferred tax asset
in accordance with the provisions of FIN 48. The remaining $0.7
million was reclassified from current tax liabilities to long term deferred
tax
liabilities. Adoption of this interpretation had no other impact on
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, CTS did not have a change to its total
unrecognized tax benefits of $4.3 million. These benefits are not
expected to be realized within the next twelve
months.
CTS’
continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income
tax matters as income tax expense. As of September 30, 2007, there were no
significant amounts accrued for interest and/or penalties related to uncertain
income tax positions.
The
Company’s tax years are subject to examination for all U.S. jurisdictions from
2003 through 2006. The international tax statutes vary widely and the
tax years subject to examination range from 2001 through 2006. Taxing
authorities also have the ability to review prior tax years to the extent of
net
operating losses and tax credit carryforwards and apply these changes to open
tax years. CTS does not anticipate any significant changes in the unrecognized
tax benefits within the next twelve months as the result of examinations or
lapse of statutes of limitation.
The
provision for income taxes for the nine-months ending September 30, 2007 was
calculated using an estimated full year rate of 21.0% compared to 23.2% for
the
nine-months ending October 1, 2006 and an actual effective rate
of 21.1% for the full year 2006. The reduction in the
effective tax rate between the nine-months ending October 1, 2006 and
nine-months ending September 30, 2007 was attributable to a higher percentage
of
foreign earnings in lower taxed jurisdictions relative to total foreign
earnings.
NOTE
J—Treasury Stock
In
November 2005, CTS’ Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to
one million shares of its common stock in the open market. Reacquired
shares will be used to support equity-based compensation programs and for other
corporate purposes. Under this program, CTS repurchased 395,000 shares at a
total cost of $4.9 million before the program expired on June 29,
2007.
In
June
2007, CTS’ Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to two
million shares of common stock in the open market. The authorization
expires on June 30, 2009. Reacquired shares will be used to support
equity-based compensation programs and for other corporate
purposes. Since June 30, 2007 CTS has repurchased 307,700 shares at a
total cost of $4.0 million, under this program.
NOTE
K—New Accounting Pronouncements
EITF
06-03 “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental
Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus
Net Presentation)”
In
June
2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue
No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental
Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus
Net Presentation)” (EITF 06-03). EITF 06-03 provides that the
presentation of taxes assessed by a governmental authority that is directly
imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer
on
either a gross basis (included in revenue and costs) or on a net basis (excluded
from revenues) is an accounting policy decision that should be
disclosed. The provisions of EITF 06-3 were effective for CTS as of
January 1, 2007. CTS classifies sales taxes on a net basis in its
consolidated financial statements.
FAS
No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”(FAS No. 157). FAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. FAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements, and accordingly, does not require
any
new fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 is effective for CTS beginning January
1, 2008. CTS is currently reviewing the provisions of FAS No. 157, but does
not
expect the provisions to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
FAS
No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities”
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, “The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (FAS No.
159). FAS No. 159 provides the option to report certain financial
assets and liabilities at fair value, with the intent to mitigate volatility
in
financial reporting that can occur when related assets and liabilities are
recorded on different bases. This statement is effective for CTS
beginning January 1, 2008. CTS does not expect FAS No. 159 to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB
Staff Position FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No.
48”
In
May
2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 48-1 that amends FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FSP FIN
48-1). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how an enterprise should
determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of
recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. CTS does not expect the
provisions to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
EITF
06-11 “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment
Awards”
In
June
2007, the EITF reached a consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting
for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (EITF
06-11). EITF 06-11 provides that a realized income tax benefit from
dividends that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for
equity classified nonvested equity shares and units should be recognized as
an
increase to additional paid-in capital. The provisions of this EITF should
be
applied prospectively to the income tax benefits of dividends on
equity-classified employee share-based payment awards that are declared in
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2007. CTS currently pays dividends
on
its unvested Restricted Stock under the 1988 Plan. CTS has reviewed the
provisions of EITF 06-11 and does not expect the provisions to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
EITF
07-3, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods and Services to
Be Used in Future Research and Development Activities”
In
June
2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-3, “Accounting for
Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods and Services to Be Used in Future
Research and Development Activities” (EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3 provides
that nonrefundable advance payments for future research and development
activities should be deferred and capitalized and recognized as an expense
as
the goods are delivered or the related services are performed. The provisions
of
this EITF are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007.
CTS
does not expect the provisions to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
CTS
is a
global manufacturer of components and sensors used primarily in the automotive,
communications, and computer markets. The Company also provides
electronic manufacturing solutions, including design and supply chain management
functions, primarily serving the communications, computer, industrial, medical
and defense and aerospace markets under contract arrangements with the original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Sales and marketing are accomplished
through CTS sales engineers, independent manufacturer’s representatives and
distributors. Sales are reported through two segments, Electronics
Manufacturing Services (EMS) and Components and Sensors.
In
the
third quarter of 2007, sales of EMS and Components and Sensors segments
represented 60.6% and 39.4% of CTS’ total sales respectively, compared to 60.9%
and 39.1% respectively in the third quarter of 2006.
As
discussed in more detail throughout the Management's Discussion and
Analysis:
·
|
Sales
increased by $9.1 million, or 5.5%, in the third quarter of 2007
from the
third quarter of 2006. Sales in the EMS segment increased by
5.1% compared to the third quarter of 2006, while sales in the Components
and Sensors segment increased by 6.1% compared to the third quarter
of
2006.
|
·
|
Gross
margin, as a percent of sales, was 19.3% and 17.6% in the third quarter
of
2007 and 2006, respectively. Gross margin within the Component
and Sensors segment was higher primarily due to improved product
mix and
lower automotive launch-related costs while EMS segment gross margins
were
higher due to favorable product mix and lower material
costs.
|
·
|
Selling,
general and administrative and research and development expenses
as a
percent of sales increased to 13.6% in the third quarter of 2007
compared
to 12.1% in the third quarter of 2006. In the third quarter of
2006, a $0.7 million pre-tax gain was realized for the sale/leaseback
of
CTS’ Albuquerque, New Mexico
building.
|
·
|
The
provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30,
2007
was calculated using an estimate full year rate of 21.0% compared
to 23.2%
for the nine months ending October 1, 2006 and an actual effective
rate of
21.1% for the full year 2006.
|
·
|
Net
earnings were $7.8 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, in the third
quarter of 2007 compared to $6.2 million, or $0.16 per diluted share,
in
the third quarter of 2006.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period.
Management
believes that judgment and estimates related to the following critical
accounting policies could materially affect its consolidated financial
statements:
·
|
Estimating
inventory valuation, the allowance for doubtful accounts, and other
accrued liabilities
|
·
|
Valuation
of long-lived and intangible assets, and depreciation/amortization
periods
|
·
|
Income
taxes
|
·
|
Retirement
plans
|
·
|
Equity-based
compensation
|
In
the
third quarter of 2007, there were no material changes in the above critical
accounting policies.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of Third Quarter 2007 and Third Quarter 2006
Segment
Discussion
Refer
to
Note F, “Segments,” for a description of the Company’s segments.
The
following table highlights the segment results for the three-month periods
ending September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006:
($
in thousands)
|
Components
& Sensors
|
EMS
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|||||||||
Third
Quarter 2007
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
$ |
68,790
|
$ |
106,000
|
$ |
174,790
|
||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
5,965
|
3,952
|
9,917
|
|||||||||
%
of sales
|
8.7 | % | 3.7 | % | 5.7 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Third
Quarter 2006
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
$ |
64,844
|
$ |
100,832
|
$ |
165,676
|
||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
5,666
|
3,598
|
9,264
|
|||||||||
%
of sales
|
8.7 | % | 3.6 | % | 5.6 | % |
Sales
in
the Components and Sensors segment increased by $3.9 million, or approximately
6.1% from the third quarter of 2006. The increase in sales was
attributable primarily to growth in automotive component demand and higher
sales
into infrastructure applications.
The
Components and Sensors segment operating earnings increased $0.3 million, or
5.2%, in the third quarter of 2007 versus the third quarter of
2006. Operating earnings increased primarily due to margin
contribution from higher sales volume, favorable product mix and lower
automotive launch related costs for certain new products, partially offset
by
higher compensation-related and outside service expenses. Also, a
gain of $0.7 million was recognized in the third quarter of 2006 on the
sale/leaseback of CTS’ Albuquerque, New Mexico building.
Sales
in
the EMS segment increased by $5.2 million, or 5.1%, in the third quarter of
2007
versus the third quarter of 2006. The increase in sales was
attributable primarily to higher sales into the industrial and defense and
aerospace markets partially offset by a decrease primarily in computer market
sales.
The
EMS
segment operating earnings increased $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2007
primarily due to improved product mix and margin contribution from higher sales
volume.
Total
Company Discussion
The
following table highlights changes in significant components of the unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three-month periods ended
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006:
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
||||||||||
($
in thousands, except net earnings per share)
|
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
174,790
|
$ |
165,676
|
$ |
9,114
|
||||||
Restructuring-related
costs
|
-
|
254
|
(254 | ) | ||||||||
%
of net sales
|
- | % | 0.2 | % | (0.2 | )% | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Gross
margin
|
33,793
|
29,105
|
4,688
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
19.3 | % | 17.6 | % | 1.7 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
19,821
|
16,320
|
3,501
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
11.3 | % | 9.9 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
4,055
|
3,775
|
280
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
2.3 | % | 2.3 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
-
|
486
|
(486 | ) | ||||||||
%
of net sales
|
- | % | 0.3 | % | (0.3 | )% | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Operating
earnings
|
9,917
|
8,524
|
1,393
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
5.7 | % | 5.1 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
2,071
|
1,904
|
167
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ |
7,794
|
$ |
6,247
|
$ |
1,547
|
||||||
%
of net sales
|
4.5 | % | 3.8 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Net
earnings per share - diluted
|
$ |
0.20
|
$ |
0.16
|
$ |
0.04
|
Third
quarter sales increased $9.1 million, or 5.5%, from the third quarter of
2006. The sales increase was mainly attributable to higher sales into
the industrial, defense and aerospace and automotive markets partially offset
by
a decline in computer sales and weak electronic component demand.
Gross
margin as a percent of sales was 19.3% in the third quarter of 2007 compared
to
17.6% in the third quarter of 2006, primarily due to favorable product mix,
lower material costs and lower automotive launch-related costs.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses were $19.8 million, or 11.3% of sales,
in
the third quarter of 2007 versus $16.3 million, or 9.9% of sales in the third
quarter of 2006. Selling, general and administrative expenses were
higher primarily due to higher compensation-related expenses and a $0.7 million
pre-tax gain for the sale/leaseback of CTS’ Albuquerque, New Mexico building
recorded in 2006.
Operating
earnings were $9.9 million, or 5.7% of sales, in the third quarter of 2007
compared to $8.5 million, or 5.1% of sales, in the third quarter of
2006. The increase in operating earnings resulted from higher gross
margin dollars. Additionally, the three months ended October 1, 2006
included restructuring and related costs associated with CTS’ Berne, Indiana and
Marlborough, Massachusetts facilities that were incurred in the third quarter
of
2006. The increase was partially offset by higher selling general and
administrative expenses.
The
provision for income taxes for the nine months ending September 30, 2007 was
calculated using an estimated full year rate of 21.0% compared to 23.2% for
the
nine months ending October 1, 2006 and an actual effective rate of 21.1% for
the
full year 2006. The reduction in the effective tax rate between the
nine months ending October 1, 2006 and the nine months ending September 30,
2007
was attributable to a higher percentage of foreign earnings in lower taxed
jurisdictions relative to total foreign earnings.
Comparison
of First Nine Months of 2007 and First Nine Months of 2006
Segment
Discussion
The
following table highlights the segment results for the nine-month periods ending
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006:
($
in thousands)
|
Components
&
Sensors
|
EMS
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|||||||||
First
Nine Months 2007
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
$ |
209,113
|
$ |
298,559
|
$ |
507,672
|
||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
16,458
|
6,309
|
22,767
|
|||||||||
%
of sales
|
7.9 | % | 2.1 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
First
Nine Months 2006
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
$ |
204,167
|
$ |
277,927
|
$ |
482,094
|
||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
24,577
|
3,424
|
28,001
|
|||||||||
%
of sales
|
12.0 | % | 1.2 | % | 5.8 | % |
During
the first nine months of 2007, sales of Components and Sensors and EMS products,
as a percentage of total sales, were 41.2% and 58.8% respectively. In
the first nine months of 2006, sales of Components and Sensors and EMS products,
as a percentage of total sales, were 42.4% and 57.6% respectively.
The
Components and Sensors segment sales increased $4.9 million or 2.4% from the
first nine months of 2006. The increase was primarily due to higher
sales of automotive products, partially offset by decreased sales of electronic
components. The Components and Sensors segment operating earnings
decreased $8.1 million, primarily due to legal and accounting expenses, lower
royalty income, lower fixed asset gains, start-up costs of CTS’ Czech Republic
facility, and an
insurance settlement received in the first quarter of 2006.
EMS
segment sales increased by $20.6 million, or 7.4%, in the first nine months
of
2007 from the first nine months of 2006. The increase is due to
higher sales into the industrial and defense and aerospace markets, partially
offset by lower computer and medical market sales. The EMS segment
operating earnings increased $2.8 million due to higher sales volumes versus
2006, improved product mix and efficiency gains, partially offset by legal
and
accounting expenses.
Total
Company Discussion
The
following table highlights changes in significant components of the condensed
consolidated statements of earnings for the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2007 and October 1, 2006:
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
($ in thousands, except net earnings per share) |
September
30, 2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
Increse
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
507,672
|
$ |
482,094
|
$ |
25,578
|
||||||
Restructuring-related
costs
|
-
|
956
|
(956 | ) | ||||||||
%
of net sales
|
- | % | 0.2 | % | (0.2 | )% | ||||||
Gross
margin
|
97,075
|
90,914
|
6,161
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
19.1 | % | 18.9 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
62,031
|
51,932
|
10,099
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
12.2 | % | 10.8 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
12,277
|
11,937
|
340
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | (0.1 | )% | ||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
-
|
3,368
|
(3,368 | ) | ||||||||
%
of net sales
|
- | % | 0.7 | % | (0.7 | )% | ||||||
Operating
earnings
|
22,767
|
23,677
|
(910 | ) | ||||||||
%
of net sales
|
4.5 | % | 4.9 | % | (0.4 | )% | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
4,717
|
4,998
|
(281 | ) | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ |
17,745
|
$ |
16,546
|
$ |
1,199
|
||||||
%
of net sales
|
3.5 | % | 3.4 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Net
earnings per share - diluted
|
$ |
0.46
|
$ |
0.43
|
$ |
0.03
|
Sales
in
the first nine months of 2007 increased $25.6 million, or 5.3%, from the first
nine months of 2006. The sales increase was attributable to higher
sales into the industrial, defense and aerospace, and automotive markets offset
by a decline in computer sales and lower electronic component
demand.
Gross
margin increased $6.2 million for the first nine months of 2007 primarily due
to
the contribution from higher sales volume and lower restructuring-related costs,
partially offset by lower royalty income. As a percentage of sales,
gross margin increased to 19.1% in the first nine months of 2007 compared to
18.9% in the first nine months of 2006.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $10.1 million, primarily from
$3.4
million of legal and accounting fees, higher compensation-related expenses,
a
favorable insurance claim settlement of $1.5 million received in 2006, and
a
pre-tax gain of $0.7 million for the sale/leaseback of CTS’ Albuquerque, New
Mexico building recorded in 2006.
Operating
earnings were $22.8 million in the first nine months of 2007 compared to $23.7
million in the first nine months of 2006. The decrease in operating
earnings was primarily attributable to higher selling, general and
administrative expenses as discussed above. The decrease in operating
earnings was partially offset by higher gross margins. Additionally,
the first nine months of 2006 included restructuring and related costs
associated with CTS’ Berne, Indiana and Marlborough, Massachusetts facilities
that were incurred in the first nine months of 2006.
The
provision for income taxes for the nine months ending September 30, 2007 was
calculated using an estimated full year rate of 21.0% compared to 23.2% for
the
nine months ending October 1, 2006 and an actual effective rate of 21.1% for
the
full year 2006. The reduction in the effective tax rate between the
nine months ending October 1, 2006 and the nine months ending September 30,
2007
was attributable to a higher percentage of foreign earnings in lower taxed
jurisdictions relative to total foreign earnings.
Interest
and other expenses through the first nine months of 2007 were $0.3 million,
$1.8
million lower than the first nine months of 2006. Compared to the
prior year, interest income increased $0.9 million, favorable foreign currency
gain increased $0.3 million and interest expense was $0.7 million lower
primarily from lower outstanding debt balances.
Outlook
Based
on
the first nine months results and the outlook for the remainder of the year,
CTS
expects full-year 2007 sales to grow by 4% to 5% over 2006. Full-year
diluted earnings per share are expected to be in a range of $0.65 to
$0.68.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Overview
Cash
and
cash equivalents were $45.0 million at September 30, 2007 compared to $38.6
million at December 31, 2006. Total debt on September 30, 2007 was
$61.9 million, lower than the $66.3 million amount at the end of 2006, primarily
due to decreased notes payable. Total debt as a percentage of total
capitalization was 15.8% at the end of the third quarter of 2007, compared
with
17.2% at the end of 2006. Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization
is
defined as the sum of notes payable, current portion of long-term debt and
long-term debt as a percent of total debt and shareholder’s equity.
Cash
Flow
Operating
Activities
Net
cash
provided by operating activities was $31.2 million for the first nine months
of
2007. Components of net cash provided by operating activities
included net earnings of $17.7 million, depreciation and amortization expense
of
$17.0 million, equity-based compensation of $2.5 million and unfavorable changes
in assets and liabilities of $1.6 million. The changes in assets and
liabilities were due to increased inventory of $12.0 million and an increase
in
prepaid pension asset of $6.7 million partially offset by increased accounts
payable and accrued liabilities of $7.8 million and decreased accounts
receivable of $3.3 million.
Net
cash
provided by operating activities was $28.5 million for the first nine months
of
2006. Components of net cash provided by operating activities
included net earnings of $16.5 million, depreciation and amortization expense
of
$19.0 million, equity-based compensation of $3.0 million and restructuring
charges of $3.4 million partially offset by an increase to the prepaid pension
asset of $4.7 million, gain on sales of assets of $2.1 million and an
unfavorable change in assets and liabilities of $8.0 million. The changes in
assets and liabilities were primarily due to increased accounts receivables
of
$10.9 million, an increase in inventory of $6.2 million, and an increase in
other current assets of $4.9 million, partially offset by an increase in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $14.0 million.
Investing
Activities
Net
cash
used by investing activities was $9.3 million for the first nine months of
2007,
primarily for capital expenditures.
Net
cash
provided by investing activities were $3.3 million for the first nine months
of
2006, including $14.5 million in proceeds for sale of assets, primarily related
to the $12.5 million proceeds for the sale of the Albuquerque facility,
partially offset by $11.1 million used for capital expenditures.
Total
free cash flow in the first nine months of 2007 was $21.9
million. Total free cash flow in the first nine months of 2006 was
$17.4 million.
The
following table summarizes free cash flow for CTS:
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
($
in millions)
|
September
30,
2007
|
October
1,
2006
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operations
|
$ |
31.2
|
$ |
28.5
|
||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(9.3 | ) | (11.1 | ) | ||||
Free
cash flow
|
$ |
21.9
|
$ |
17.4
|
Free
cash
flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that CTS defines as net cash provided
by
operations less capital expenditures. The most comparable GAAP
measure is net cash provided by operations. CTS' management uses free
cash flow to evaluate financial performance and in strategic planning,
specifically, for investing and financing decisions. CTS' management
believes that free cash flow is a useful measure because it indicates the
ability of a business operation to fund its own required capital
investments. CTS' management believes that the non-GAAP measure free
cash flow is useful to investors because it reflects the performance of its
overall operations more accurately than net cash provided by operations and
because it provides investors with the same results that management uses as
the
basis for making decisions about the business. Free cash flow is not
an indicator of residual cash available for discretionary spending, because
it
does not take into account mandatory debt service or other non-discretionary
spending requirements which are not deducted in the calculation of free cash
flow. CTS' management takes these limitations into account when using
free cash flow to make investing and financing decisions.
Financing
Activities
Net
cash
used in financing activities was $16.2 million in first nine months of 2007,
consisting primarily of an $8.9 million purchase of treasury stock, $3.5 million
in decreased short-term debt and $3.2 million in dividend payments.
Net
cash
used in financing activities was $15.9 million in first nine months of 2006,
consisting primarily of a net $7.7 million reduction in long-term debt
associated with the payment of the $5.5 million of 6.5% debenture, a decrease
in
short- term notes payable of $3.8 million, $3.2 million in dividends payments,
and a $0.9 million purchase of treasury stock.
Capital
Resources
Refer
to
Note D, “Debt,” for further discussion.
On
June
27, 2006, CTS entered into a $100 million, unsecured revolving credit
agreement. Under the terms of the revolving credit agreement, CTS can
expand the credit facility to $150 million. There were no amounts
outstanding under the revolving credit agreement at September 30,
2007. Interest rates on the revolving credit agreement fluctuate
based upon LIBOR and the Company’s quarterly total leverage
ratio. CTS pays a commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the
revolving credit agreement. The commitment fee varies based on the
quarterly leverage ratio and was 0.15 percent per annum at September 30,
2007. The revolving credit agreement requires, among other things,
that CTS comply with a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio. Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could
reduce the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
agreement. CTS was in compliance with all debt covenants at September 30,
2007.
Additionally,
the revolving agreement contains restrictions relating to the amount of secured
debt the Company can have outstanding, the amounts allowed for acquisitions
or
asset sales and the amounts allowed for stock repurchases and dividend
payments. The revolving credit agreement expires in June
2011.
CTS
believes cash flows from operating activities and available borrowings under
its
revolving credit agreement will be adequate to fund its working capital and
capital expenditure requirements. CTS may choose to pursue additional
equity and/or debt financing to fund acquisitions and/or to reduce its overall
interest expense or improve its capital structure.
In
November 2005, CTS’ Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to
one million shares of its common stock in the open market. Reacquired
shares will be used to support equity-based compensation programs and for other
corporate purposes. Under this program, CTS repurchased 395,000
shares at a total cost of $4.9 million before the program expired June 29,
2007.
In
June
2007, CTS’ Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to two
million shares of its common stock in the open market. The
authorization expires on June 30, 2009. Reacquired shares will be
used to support equity-based compensation programs and for other corporate
purposes. Since June 30, 2007 CTS has repurchased 307,700 shares at a
total cost of $4.0 million, under this program.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
EITF
06-03 “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental
Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus
Net Presentation)”
In
June
2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue
No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental
Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross Versus
Net Presentation)” (EITF 06-03). EITF 06-03 provides that the
presentation of taxes assessed by a governmental authority that is directly
imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer
on
either a gross basis (included in revenue and costs) or on a net basis (excluded
from revenues) is an accounting policy decision that should be
disclosed. The provisions of EITF 06-3 were effective for CTS as of
January 1, 2007. CTS classifies sales taxes on a net basis in its
consolidated financial statements.
FAS
No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”(FAS No. 157). FAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. FAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements, and accordingly, does not require
any
new fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 is effective for CTS beginning January
1, 2008. CTS is currently reviewing the provisions of FAS No. 157, but does
not
expect the provisions to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
FAS
No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities”
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, “The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (FAS No.
159). FAS No. 159 provides the option to report certain financial
assets and liabilities at fair value, with the intent to mitigate volatility
in
financial reporting that can occur when related assets and liabilities are
recorded on different bases. This statement is effective for CTS
beginning January 1, 2008. CTS does not expect FAS No. 159 to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB
Staff Position FIN 48-1, “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No.
48”
In
May
2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 48-1 that amends FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FSP FIN
48-1). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how an enterprise should
determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of
recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. CTS does not expect the
provisions to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
EITF
06-11 “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment
Awards”
In
June
2007, the EITF reached a consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting
for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (EITF
06-11). EITF 06-11 provides that a realized income tax benefit from
dividends that are charged to retained earnings and are paid to employees for
equity classified nonvested equity shares and units should be recognized as
an
increase to additional paid-in capital. The provisions of this EITF should
be
applied prospectively to the income tax benefits of dividends on
equity-classified employee share-based payment awards that are declared in
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2007. CTS currently pays dividends
on
its unvested Restricted Stock under the 1988 Plan. CTS has reviewed the
provisions of EITF 06-11 and does not expect the provisions to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
EITF
07-3, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods and Services to
Be Used in Future Research and Development Activities”
In
June
2007, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-3, “Accounting for
Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods and Services to Be Used in Future
Research and Development Activities” (EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3 provides
that nonrefundable advance payments for future research and development
activities should be deferred and capitalized and recognized as an expense
as
the goods are delivered or the related services are performed. The provisions
of
this EITF are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007.
CTS
does not expect the provisions to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
*****
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
document contains statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of
1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, any financial or other guidance, statements that reflect our current
expectations concerning future results and events, and any other statements
that
are not based solely on historical fact. Forward-looking statements
are based on management’s expectations, certain assumptions and currently
available information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
hereof. These forward-looking statements are made subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause our actual results,
performance or achievements to differ materially from those presented in the
forward-looking statements. For more detailed information on the
risks and uncertainties associated with CTS’ business, see our reports filed
with the SEC. Examples of factors that may affect future operating
results and financial condition include, but are not limited to: rapid
technological change; general market conditions in the automotive,
communications, and computer industries, as well as conditions in the
industrial, defense & aerospace, and medical markets; reliance on key
customers; the ability to protect our intellectual property; pricing pressures
and demand for our products; and risks associated with our international
operations, including trade and tariff barriers, exchange rates and political
and geopolitical risks; and the impact of the accounting misstatements at its
Moorpark and Santa Clara, California locations, including the results of the
impact of the SEC’s informal inquiry into these misstatements. CTS
undertakes no obligation to publicly update its forward-looking statements
to
reflect new information or events or circumstances that arise after the date
hereof, including market or industry changes.
There
have been no material changes in CTS’ market risk since December 31,
2006.
In
February 2007, CTS announced that it was investigating incorrect accounting
entries at its Moorpark, California manufacturing location and that its
financial statements for the first three quarters of 2006 should not be relied
upon. The investigation determined that incorrect entries transferred
significant costs from income statement accounts, primarily cost of goods sold,
to balance sheet accounts, primarily accounts payable, beginning in 2005 and
continuing through 2006. For more information on these matters,
please refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors; Item 9A Controls and Procedures; Note
B
to the consolidated financial statements, “Restatement of the Consolidated
Financial Statements” and Management 's Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting in CTS’ 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed May 15,
2007. Management determined that the effect of the misstatements on
CTS' 2006 consolidated financial statements was material and accordingly
amendments to CTS’ 2006 Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q/A restating CTS'
condensed consolidated financial statements for each of the first three quarters
of 2006 were filed contemporaneously with CTS’ 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition, as a result of the incorrect entries discussed above CTS restated
its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005
in
its 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In
its assessment of internal control
over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2006, CTS' management
concluded that a material weakness existed in CTS' internal control over
financial reporting. The
following control deficiencies, on a combined basis, resulted in the material
weakness related to the Moorpark and Santa Clara, California manufacturing
locations:
·
|
Monitoring
and accountability over the operating effectiveness of controls including
effective operation of designed controls over reconciliations, journal
entry approval and oversight.
|
·
|
Ability
to set-up fictitious vendors and ability to make payments to vendors
without appropriate support and
approval.
|
·
|
Lack
of effectiveness of the internal audit function to obtain an understanding
of process and controls at the Moorpark and Santa Clara, California
locations.
|
Prior
to
identifying the material weakness described above, CTS’ management had taken
actions to strengthen the Moorpark and Santa Clara accounting
organization by replacing the Moorpark plant controller and adding a Santa
Clara
plant controller. Since identifying the material weakness, CTS has
implemented the following changes to strengthen its internal control over
financial reporting:
·
|
Increased
review and approval of all manual journal entries by the entity
controllers.
|
·
|
Increased
review and approval of all account reconciliation activities by the
entity
controllers.
|
·
|
Added
a senior Corporate accountant to provide additional review and oversight
of all key accounting processes globally, including manual journal
entries
and key account reconciliations.
|
·
|
Increased
internal audit resources and revised internal audit programs to increase
the scope and frequency of audits.
|
·
|
Standardized
and strengthened the account reconciliation process at both Moorpark
and
Santa Clara.
|
·
|
Completed
a review of all Moorpark and Santa Clara
vendors.
|
·
|
Removed
the entity controllers’ ability to set-up vendors and make payments
through the financial information
system.
|
·
|
Removed
the entity controllers’ security access to record journal
entries.
|
Management
believes these actions have strengthened the internal control environment at
both Moorpark and Santa Clara and that these actions have remediated the
material weakness described above. These internal control
enhancements will be tested throughout the year by CTS’ Internal Audit
organization to confirm that they are operating effectively.
In
addition, CTS intends to implement the following changes over the course of
2007
to further strengthen its internal control environment:
·
|
Further
enhance the Moorpark and Santa Clara reporting system documentation
and
user training.
|
·
|
Continue
to strengthen operating policies, including policies around pricing
adjustments, customer returns and vendor disputes at all CTS
locations.
|
·
|
Institute
additional operational monitoring reports to review and track early
warning signs e.g. short payments, premium freight and customer rejects
at
all CTS locations.
|
·
|
Further
enhance and document CTS’ annual vendor certification process at all CTS
locations.
|
·
|
Standardize
and strengthen the account reconciliation process at all CTS
locations.
|
As
of
September 30, 2007 CTS' management, including its Chief Executive Officer and
its Interim Chief Financial Officer, have carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of CTS' disclosure controls and procedures. Based on
the determination that the material weakness remediations in CTS' internal
control over financial reporting described above have not been fully tested,
CTS’ Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer have determined
that CTS' disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September
30, 2007.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except
as
described above, there were no changes in CTS' internal control over financial
reporting for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that have materially affected
or are reasonably likely to materially affect CTS' internal control over
financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER
INFORMATION
Certain
processes in the manufacturer of CTS’ current and past products create hazardous
waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and
regulations. CTS has been notified by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator
groups that it is or may be a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) regarding
hazardous waste remediation at several non-CTS sites. In addition to
these non-CTS sites, CTS has an ongoing practice of providing
reserves for probably remediation activities at certain of its manufacturing
locations and for claims and proceedings against CTS with respect to other
environmental matters. In the opinion of management, based upon
presently available information relating to all such matters, either adequate
provision for probable costs has been made, or the ultimate costs resulting
will
not materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows of CTS.
Certain
claims are pending against CTS with respect to matters arising out of the
ordinary conduct of its business. For all claims, in the opinion of
management, based upon presently available information, either adequate
provision for anticipated costs has been made by insurance, accruals or
otherwise, or the ultimate anticipated costs resulting will not materially
affect CTS’ consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
CTS
has
been informed that the staff of the SEC is conducting an informal inquiry
relating to the accounting misstatements of its Moorpark and Santa Clara,
California manufacturing facilities. CTS is in full cooperation with
the SEC in its inquiry.
There
have been no significant changes in the Company’s risk factors since December
31, 2006.
The
following table summarizes the repurchases of CTS common stock made by the
Company during the three-month period ending September 30, 2007:
(a)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
(b)
Average
Price
Paid
per Share
|
(c)
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of Plans
or
Programs
(1)
|
(d)
Maximum
Number
of
Shares
That
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Plans or Programs
|
|||||||||||||
2,340,000
|
||||||||||||||||
July
2, 2007 – July 5, 2007
|
45,000
|
$ |
12.90
|
45,000
|
2,000,000
|
|||||||||||
August
8, 2007 – August 24, 2007
|
116,000
|
12.95
|
116,000
|
1,884,000
|
||||||||||||
August
27, 2007 – September 28, 2007
|
191,700
|
13.02
|
191,700
|
1,692,300
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
352,700
|
$ |
12.98
|
352,700
|
|
_________________________________
|
(1)
|
In
November 2005, CTS’ Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase
up to one million shares of its common stock in the open
market. The authorization expired June 29,
2007.
|
|
In
June 2007, CTS’ Board of Director authorized a program to repurchase up to
two million shares of its common stock in the open market. The
authorization expires June 30,
2009.
|
Performance
Share Agreement with Vinod M. Khilnani
|
||
Amendment
to Employment Agreement of Donald K. Schwanz
|
||
Amendment
to CTS Corporation Individual Excess Benefit Retirement Plan of Donald
K.
Schwanz
|
||
Form
of CTS Corporation Individual Excess Benefit Retirement
Plan
|
||
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
||
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
||
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
CTS
Corporation
|
|
CTS
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Richard G. Cutter III
|
|
/s/
Vinod M. Khilnani
|
|
Richard
G. Cutter III
Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel
|
|
Vinod
M. Khilnani
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
October 24, 2007
|
|
Dated:
October 24, 2007
|
|
30