CTS CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
Quarterly Period Ended March 29,
2009
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
Transition Period from _______________ to _______________
Commission
File Number: 1-4639
CTS
CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana
|
35-0225010
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
905
West Boulevard North, Elkhart, IN
|
46514
|
|||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: 574-523-3800
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer x Non-accelerated
filer (Do not check if smaller reporting company) o
Smaller
reporting company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of April 27, 2009: 33,747,763.
Page
|
|||
Item
1.
|
3
|
||
3
|
|||
- For the Three Months Ended March 29, 2009 and March 30,
2008
|
|||
4
|
|||
- As of March 29, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|||
5
|
|||
- For the Three Months Ended March 29, 2009 and March 30,
2008
|
|||
6
|
|||
- For the Three Months Ended March 29, 2009 and March 30,
2008
|
|||
7
|
|||
Item
2.
|
20
|
||
Item
3.
|
26
|
||
Item
4.
|
26
|
||
Item
1.
|
26
|
||
Item
1A.
|
27
|
||
Item
2.
|
27
|
||
Item
6.
|
27
|
||
28
|
Item
1. Financial
Statements
|
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
March
29,
2009
|
March 30,
2008*
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 118,131 | $ | 172,755 | ||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
98,302 | 138,931 | ||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses
|
16,620 | 20,976 | ||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
3,353 | 4,317 | ||||||
Restructuring
charge – Note I
|
2,243 | 150 | ||||||
Goodwill
impairment – Note J
|
33,153 | — | ||||||
Operating
(loss)/earnings
|
(35,540 | ) | 8,381 | |||||
Other
(expense)/income:
|
||||||||
Interest
expense – Note E
|
(888 | ) | (1,678 | ) | ||||
Interest
income
|
70 | 478 | ||||||
Other
|
(321 | ) | 747 | |||||
Total
other expense
|
(1,139 | ) | (453 | ) | ||||
(Loss)/earnings before
income taxes
|
(36,679 | ) | 7,928 | |||||
Income
tax (benefit)/expense
|
(1,030 | ) | 1,631 | |||||
Net
(loss)/earnings
|
$ | (35,649 | ) | $ | 6,297 | |||
Net
(loss)/earnings per share - Note K
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (1.06 | ) | $ | 0.19 | |||
Diluted
|
$ | (1.06 | ) | $ | 0.18 | |||
Cash
dividends declared per share
|
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.03 | ||||
Average
common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
33,744 | 33,845 | ||||||
Diluted
|
33,744 | 38,335 |
*The
Statement of Earnings at March 30, 2008 was adjusted from the previously filed
10-Q to comply with the provisions of FASB Staff Position No. APB
14-1,“Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash
upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”.
See notes
to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
(In
thousands of dollars)
March
29,
2009
|
December
31, 2008*
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
44,622
|
$
|
44,628
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowances (2009 - $2,327; 2008 - $2,165)
|
76,661
|
94,175
|
||||||
Inventories,
net – Note
D
|
70,218
|
70,867
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
17,285
|
16,172
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
208,786
|
225,842
|
||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation (2009 - $258,209;
2008 - $257,850)
|
87,728
|
90,756
|
||||||
Other
Assets
|
||||||||
Prepaid
pension asset
|
20,707
|
18,756
|
||||||
Goodwill
– Note J
|
—
|
33,150
|
||||||
Other
intangible assets – Note J
|
36,020
|
36,927
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
81,528
|
82,101
|
||||||
Other
|
891
|
910
|
||||||
Total
other assets
|
139,146
|
171,844
|
||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
435,660
|
$
|
488,442
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$
|
197
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
53,428
|
71,285
|
||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
36,402
|
41,956
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
90,027
|
113,241
|
||||||
Long-term
debt – Note
E
|
85,864
|
79,988
|
||||||
Other
long-term obligations
|
17,201
|
17,740
|
||||||
Shareholders’
Equity
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock - authorized 25,000,000 shares without par value; none
issued
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Common
stock - authorized 75,000,000 shares without par value; 54,068,522 shares
issued at
March 29, 2009 and
54,031,844 shares
issued at
December 31, 2008
|
280,505
|
280,266
|
||||||
Additional
contributed capital
|
37,823
|
37,148
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
319,033
|
355,694
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(97,784
|
)
|
(98,626
|
)
|
||||
539,577
|
574,482
|
|||||||
Cost
of common stock held in treasury (2009 and 2008 – 20,320,759
shares)
|
(297,009
|
)
|
(297,009
|
)
|
||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
242,568
|
277,473
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$
|
435,660
|
$
|
488,442
|
||||
*The Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2008 was adjusted from the previously filed 10-K to comply
with the provisions of FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1,“Accounting for
Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(Including Partial Cash Settlement)”.
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
(In
thousands of dollars)
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
March
29,
2009
|
March
30,
2008*
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss)/earnings
|
$
|
(35,649
|
)
|
$
|
6,297
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss)/earnings to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,265
|
6,039
|
||||||
Prepaid
pension asset – Note F
|
(1,951
|
)
|
(2,420
|
)
|
||||
Equity-based
compensation – Note B
|
943
|
872
|
||||||
Restructuring
and impairment charges – Note I
|
2,243
|
55
|
||||||
Goodwill
impairment – Note J
|
33,153
|
—
|
||||||
(Gain)/loss
on sales of assets
|
(47
|
)
|
2
|
|||||
Amortization
of retirement benefit adjustments – Note F
|
1,322
|
540
|
||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
17,326
|
(3,537
|
)
|
|||||
Inventories
|
315
|
(823
|
)
|
|||||
Other
current assets
|
(1,732
|
)
|
(255
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(25,157
|
)
|
(13,911
|
)
|
||||
Other
|
(33
|
)
|
1,674
|
|||||
Total
adjustments
|
31,647
|
(11,764
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(4,002
|
)
|
(5,467
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Payments
for acquisitions, net of cash received – Note C
|
—
|
(20,606
|
)
|
|||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(1,425
|
)
|
(3,488
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sales of assets
|
198
|
—
|
||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,227
|
)
|
(24,094
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Payments
of long-term debt – Note E
|
(615,800
|
)
|
(223,300
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from borrowings of long-term debt – Note E
|
621,300
|
268,000
|
||||||
Payments
of short-term notes payable
|
(4,672
|
)
|
(2,961
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from borrowings of short-term notes payable
|
4,869
|
1,961
|
||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(1,012
|
)
|
(1,010
|
)
|
||||
Other
|
(17
|
)
|
(6,814
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
4,668
|
35,876
|
||||||
Effect
of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
555
|
164
|
||||||
Net
(decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(6
|
)
|
6,479
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
44,628
|
52,868
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
44,622
|
$
|
59,347
|
||||
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
271
|
$
|
528
|
||||
Income
taxes—net
|
$
|
1,946
|
$
|
255
|
||||
*The
Statement of Cash Flows at March 30, 2008 was adjusted from the previously filed
10-Q to comply with the provisions of FASB Staff Position No. APB
14-1,“Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash
upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”.
CTS
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) EARNINGS -
UNAUDITED
(In
thousands of dollars)
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
March
29,
2009
|
March
30,
2008*
|
|||||||
Net
(loss)/earnings
|
$
|
(35,649
|
)
|
$
|
6,297
|
|||
Other
comprehensive earnings:
|
||||||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
28
|
173
|
||||||
Amortization of
retirement benefit adjustments (net of tax)
|
814
|
244
|
||||||
Comprehensive
(loss)/earnings
|
$
|
(34,807
|
)
|
$
|
6,714
|
*The
Statement of Comprehensive Earnings at March 30, 2008 was adjusted from the
previously filed 10-Q to comply with the provisions of FASB Staff Position No.
APB 141,“Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash
upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”.
See notes
to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
March
29, 2009
NOTE A – Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by
CTS Corporation ("CTS" or "the Company"), without audit, pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements, notes thereto, and other information included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
items) necessary for a fair statement, in all material respects, of the
financial position and results of operations for the periods presented.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported
period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results for the entire year.
NOTE B – Equity-Based
Compensation
At March
29, 2009, CTS had five equity-based compensation plans: the 1988
Restricted Stock and Cash Bonus Plan ("1988 Plan"), the 1996 Stock Option Plan
("1996 Plan"), the 2001 Stock Option Plan ("2001 Plan"), the Nonemployee
Directors’ Stock Retirement Plan ("Directors’ Plan"), and the 2004 Omnibus
Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2004 Plan"). As of December 2004,
additional grants can only be made under the 2004 Plan. CTS believes
that equity based awards align the interest of employees with those of its
shareholders.
The 2004
Plan, and previously the 1996 Plan and 2001 Plan, provides for grants of
incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options to officers, key
employees, and nonemployee members of CTS’ board of directors. In
addition, the 2004 Plan allows for grants of stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units,
and other stock awards.
The
following table summarizes the compensation expense included in the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three months ended March
29, 2009 and March 30, 2008 relating to these plans:
($
in thousands)
|
March
29,
2009
|
March
30,
2008
|
||||||
Stock
options
|
$ | 19 | $ | 49 | ||||
Restricted
stock units
|
924 | 804 | ||||||
Restricted
stock
|
— | 20 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 943 | $ | 873 |
The
following table summarizes the status of these plans as of March 29,
2009:
2004
Plan
|
2001
Plan
|
1996
Plan
|
||||||||||
Awards
originally available
|
6,500,000
|
2,000,000
|
1,200,000
|
|||||||||
Stock
options outstanding
|
313,850
|
743,863
|
227,050
|
|||||||||
Restricted
stock units outstanding
|
660,958
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Awards
exercisable
|
239,325
|
743,863
|
227,050
|
|||||||||
Awards
available for grant
|
5,080,431
|
—
|
—
|
Stock
Options
Stock
options are exercisable in cumulative annual installments over a maximum 10-year
period, commencing at least one year from the date of
grant. Stock options are generally granted with an exercise
price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of
grant. The stock options generally vest over four years and have a
10-year contractual life. The awards generally contain provisions to
either accelerate vesting or allow vesting to continue on schedule upon
retirement if certain service and age requirements are met. The
awards also provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control
event.
The
Company estimates the fair value of the stock option on the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and assumptions for expected price
volatility, option term, risk-free interest rate, and dividend
yield. Expected price volatilities are based on historical
volatilities of the Company’s stock. The expected option term is
derived from historical data on exercise behavior. The dividend yield
is based on historical dividend payments. The risk-free rate for
periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
A summary
of the status of stock options as of March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, and
changes during the three-month periods then ended, is presented
below:
March
29, 2009
|
March
30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
1,294,263 | $ | 14.53 | 1,426,638 | $ | 16.06 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | (2,000 | ) | 8.22 | |||||||||||
Expired
|
(9,500 | ) | 22.38 | (98,250 | ) | 34.30 | ||||||||||
Forfeited
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of period
|
1,284,763 | $ | 14.47 | 1,326,388 | $ | 14.72 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at end of period
|
1,210,238 | $ | 14.59 | 1,173,401 | $ | 15.05 |
The total
intrinsic value of share options exercised during the quarter ended March 30,
2008 was $2,600. There were no share options exercised during the
quarter ended March 29, 2009.
A summary
of the weighted-average remaining contractual term and aggregate intrinsic value
of options outstanding and exercisable at March 29, 2009 is presented
below:
Weighted-average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||
Options
outstanding
|
3.7
years
|
$
|
—
|
||
Options
exercisable
|
3.5
years
|
—
|
A summary
of the nonvested stock options as of March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, and
changes during the three-month periods then ended, is presented
below:
March
29, 2009
|
March
30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
Options
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Nonvested
at beginning of year
|
74,525 | $ | 12.54 | 158,587 | $ | 6.41 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Vested
|
— | — | (5,600 | ) | 8.31 | |||||||||||
Forfeited
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Nonvested
at end of period (1)
|
74,525 | $ | 12.54 | 152,987 | $ | 6.34 |
_____________________
(1) Based
on historical experience CTS currently expects approximately all of these
options to vest.
There
were no shares vested during the quarter ended March 29, 2009. The
total fair value of shares vested during the quarter ended March 30, 2008 was
$47,000. As of March 29, 2009, there was $20,000 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.9
years. CTS recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if
the award was, in substance, multiple awards.
The
following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March
29, 2009:
Options
Outstanding
|
Options
Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Range
of
|
Number
|
Remaining
|
Weighted
Average
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
|
||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Outstanding
|
Contractual
|
Exercise
|
Exercisable
|
Exercise
|
||||||||||||||||
Prices
|
at
3/29/09
|
Life
(Years)
|
Price
|
At
3/29/09
|
Price
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
7.70
– 11.11
|
778,763
|
4.41
|
$
|
9.44
|
745,738
|
$
|
9.37
|
|||||||||||||
13.68
– 16.24
|
227,800
|
4.49
|
14.12
|
186,300
|
14.22
|
||||||||||||||||
23.00
– 33.63
|
231,950
|
1.79
|
24.77
|
231,950
|
24.77
|
||||||||||||||||
35.97
– 79.25
|
46,250
|
1.12
|
49.20
|
46,250
|
49.20
|
Service-Based Restricted
Stock Units
Service-based
restricted stock units ("RSUs") entitle the holder to receive one share of
common stock for each unit when the unit vests. RSUs are issued to
officers and key employees as compensation. Generally, the RSUs vest
over a five-year period. A summary of the status of RSUs as of March
29, 2009 and March 30, 2008, and changes during the three-month periods then
ended is presented below:
March
29, 2009
|
March
30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
RSUs
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
RSUs
|
Weighted-average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
700,358 | $ | 10.76 | 595,148 | $ | 12.14 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
6,000 | 5.26 | 26,000 | 10.62 | ||||||||||||
Converted
|
(38,950 | ) | 6.47 | (10,430 | ) | 10.89 | ||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(6,450 | ) | 12.11 | (9,810 | ) | 12.33 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of period
|
660,958 | $ | 10.95 | 600,908 | $ | 12.10 | ||||||||||
Weighted-average
remaining contractual life
|
5.5
years
|
5.0
years
|
As of
March 29, 2009, there was $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related
to nonvested RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.4 years. CTS recognizes expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately
vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple
awards.
Performance-Based Restricted
Stock Units
On
February 6, 2007, CTS granted performance-based restricted stock unit awards for
certain executives. Executives received a total of 17,100 units based
on achievement of year-over-year sales growth and free cash flow performance
goals for fiscal year 2007. These units will cliff vest and convert
one-for-one to CTS common stock on December 31, 2010.
On
February 5, 2008, CTS granted performance-based restricted stock unit awards for
certain executives. Vesting may occur, if at all, at a rate of 200%
of the target amount of 42,200 units in 2010 subject to certification of the
2009 fiscal year results by CTS’ independent auditors. Vesting is
dependent upon CTS’ achievement of sales growth targets.
CTS
recorded compensation expense of $35,000 and $24,000 related to
performance-based restricted stock units during the three months ended March 29,
2009 and March 30, 2008. As of March 29, 2009 there was $115,000 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to performance-based
RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.3 years.
Market-Based Restricted
Stock Units
On July
2, 2007, CTS granted a market-based restricted stock unit award for an executive
officer. An aggregate of 25,000 units may be earned in performance
years ending in the following three consecutive years on the anniversary of the
award date. Vesting may occur, if at all, at a rate of up to 150% of
the target award on the end date of each performance period and is tied
exclusively to CTS total stockholder return relative to 32 enumerated peer group
companies’ total stockholder return rates. The vesting rate will be
determined using a matrix based on a percentile ranking of CTS total stockholder
return with peer group total shareholder return.
On
February 5, 2008, CTS granted market-based restricted stock unit awards for
certain executives. Vesting may occur, if at all, at a rate of up to
200% of the target amount of 63,300 units in 2010. Vesting is dependent upon
CTS’ total stockholder return relative to 29 enumerated peer group companies’
stockholder return rates.
On
February 4, 2009, CTS granted market-based restricted stock unit awards for
certain executives and key employees. Vesting may occur, if at all,
at a rate of up to 200% of the target amount of 128,000 units in
2011. Vesting is dependent upon CTS total stockholder return relative
to 28 enumerated peer group companies’ stockholder return rates.
CTS
recorded compensation expense of approximately $219,000 and $147,000 related to
market-based restricted stock units during the three months ended March 29, 2009
and March 30, 2008. As of March 29, 2009 there was approximately $1.2
million of unrecognized compensation cost related to market-based
RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.2 years.
Stock Retirement
Plan
The
Directors’ Plan provides for a portion of the total compensation payable to
nonemployee directors to be deferred and paid in CTS stock. The
Directors’ Plan was frozen effective December 1, 2004. All future
grants will be from the 2004 Plan.
NOTE
C—Acquisitions
In 2008,
CTS acquired, with cash, 100% of the outstanding capital stock of the following
two entities for $21.1 million, net of $1.3 million cash received.
·
|
Tusonix,
Inc. (“Tusonix”), based in Tucson, Arizona, a leader in the design and
manufacture of ceramic electromagnetic interference and radio frequency
interference (“EMI/RFI”) filters;
and
|
·
|
Orion
Manufacturing, Inc. (“Orion”), based in San Jose, California, a contract
electronics manufacturer.
|
The
acquisition of Tusonix will expand CTS’ technology and customer base within the
Components and Sensors segment. The acquisition of Orion will enable
CTS’ EMS segment to achieve significant synergies by combining the Orion
operation with the CTS operation in Santa Clara, California. It will
also expand CTS’ customer base in certain target markets.
Under the
terms of the Orion agreement, CTS may pay a contingent earn out of up to $1.75
million in cash, based on the achievement of certain financial targets in 2008
and 2009. Contingencies earned under the terms of this agreement will
be recorded as an adjustment to the purchase price. CTS accrued $0.75
million at December 31, 2008. This $0.75 million was paid out during the first
quarter of 2009.
These
acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in
accordance with FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, whereby the total purchase
price was allocated to tangible and intangible assets based on the fair market
values on the date of acquisition. The pro forma effects of the results of this
acquisition is immaterial to CTS’ results of operations.
CTS
determined the purchase price allocations on the acquisitions based on estimates
of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. These estimates were arrived at using recognized valuation
techniques. The purchase price allocations for both acquisitions have
been finalized as of March 29, 2009.
Goodwill
recognized in those transactions amounted to $8.5 million and is not deductible
for tax purposes. Of this goodwill, $6.6 million was assigned to the
Electronic Manufacturing Services (“EMS”) segment and $1.9 million was assigned
to the Components and Sensors segment. In addition, CTS also
recognized $2.5 million and $1.3 million of customer list intangibles for
Tusonix and Orion, respectively. These intangibles will be amortized
over a period of 15 years and 10 years for Tusonix and Orion,
respectively. During the first quarter of 2009, the entire goodwill
balance was written off to impairment. Refer to Note J, “Fair Value
Measurements”, for further discussion.
NOTE D – Inventories,
net
Inventories
consist of the following:
($
in thousands)
|
March
29,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
$
|
10,139
|
$
|
7,813
|
||||
Work-in-process
|
17,469
|
16,246
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
42,610
|
46,808
|
||||||
Total
inventories, net
|
$
|
70,218
|
$
|
70,867
|
NOTE
E – Debt
Long-term
debt was comprised of the following:
($
in thousands)
|
March
29,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||
Revolving
credit agreement, weighted-average interest rate of 1.2% (2009), and 4.2%
(2008)
due in 2011
|
$ | 53,500 | 48,000 | |||||
Convertible,
senior subordinated debentures at an effective interest rate of 7.0% and a
coupon
rate of 2.1%,
due in 2024, net
of discount of $136
and $512
|
32,364 | 31,988 | ||||||
Total
long-term debt
|
$ | 85,864 | 79,988 |
On June
27, 2006, CTS entered into a $100 million, unsecured revolving credit
agreement. Under the terms of the revolving credit agreement, CTS can
expand the credit facility to $150 million, subject to participating banks’
approval. There was $53.5 million and $48.0 million outstanding under
the revolving credit agreement at March 29, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. At March 29, 2009, CTS had $46.5 million available
under this agreement. Interest rates on the revolving credit agreement fluctuate
based upon LIBOR and the Company’s quarterly total leverage
ratio. CTS pays a commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the
revolving credit agreement. The commitment fee varies based on the
quarterly leverage ratio and was 0.15 percent per annum at March 29,
2009. The revolving credit agreement requires, among other things,
that CTS comply with a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio. Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could
reduce the borrowing availability under the revolving credit
agreement. CTS was in compliance with all debt covenants at March 29,
2009. The revolving credit agreement requires CTS to deliver quarterly
financial statements, annual financial statements, auditors certifications and
compliance certificates within a specified number of days after the end of a
quarter and year-end. Additionally, the revolving agreement contains
restrictions limiting CTS' ability to: dispose of assets; incur certain
additional debt; repay other debt or amend subordinated debt instruments; create
liens on assets; make investments, loans or advances; make acquisitions or
engage in mergers or consolidations; engage in certain transactions with
CTS' subsidiaries and affiliates; and the amounts allowed for stock repurchases
and dividend payments. The revolving credit agreement expires in June
2011.
CTS has
$32.5 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated debentures
(“2.125% Debentures”). These unsecured debentures bear interest at an annual
rate of 2.125%, payable semiannually on May 1 and November 1 of each year
through the maturity date of May 1, 2024. The 2.125% Debentures are convertible,
under certain circumstances, into CTS common stock at a conversion price of
$15.00 per share (which is equivalent to an initial conversion rate of
approximately 66.6667 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes). Upon
conversion of the 2.125% Debentures, in lieu of delivering common stock, the
Company may, at its discretion, deliver cash or a combination of cash and common
stock.
The
conversion price of the 2.125% Debentures will be adjusted if CTS completes
certain transactions, including: distribution of shares as a dividend to
substantially all shareholders; subdivision, combination or reclassification of
its common stock; distribution of stock purchase warrants to substantially all
shareholders; distribution of cash, stock or property to shareholders in excess
of $0.03 per share; or purchase of its common stock pursuant to a
tender offer or exchange offer under certain circumstances.
Holders
may convert the 2.125% Debentures at any time during a conversion period if the
closing price of CTS common stock is more than 120% of the conversion price
($18.00 per share) for at least 20 of the 30 consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the first trading day of the conversion period. The
conversion periods begin on February 15, May 15, August 15, and November 15 of
each year. Holders may also convert the debentures if certain corporate
transactions occur. As of March 29, 2009, none of the conditions for conversion
of the 2.125% Debentures were satisfied.
CTS may,
at its option, redeem all or a portion of the 2.125% Debentures for cash at any
time on or after May 1, 2009, at a redemption price equal to the principal
amount of the debentures plus any accrued and unpaid interest at the redemption
date. Holders may require CTS to purchase for cash all or part of their
debentures on May 1, 2009, 2014, and 2019, or upon the occurrence of certain
events, at 100% of the principal amount of the debentures plus accrued and
unpaid interest up to, but not including, the date of
purchase. In the fourth quarter 2008, CTS purchased $27.5
million of its 2.125% Debentures through open market discounted
transactions. In the event that a portion or all of the remaining
$32.5 million of these debentures are redeemed on May 1, 2009, CTS intends to
utilize its existing revolving credit agreement to fund the redemption, in the
event other long-term financing is not utilized. Consistent with the
debenture, CTS notified the holders of the notes that the holders may, at their
option, require the Company to purchase their notes by delivery of a purchase
notice to the Company and the paying agent by April 29, 2009.
In May
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial
Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”) that required issues of such instruments to
separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will
reflect the entity’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is
recognized in subsequent periods. FSP APB 14-1 must be applied retrospectively
to all past periods presented even if the instrument has matured, has been
converted, or has otherwise been extinguished as of FSP APB 14-1’s effective
date of January 1, 2009. CTS adopted the provisions of this FSP in relation to
its 2.125% subordinated debentures effective January 1, 2009 and the financial
statements presented reflect the provisions of FSP APB 14-1.
The
cumulative effect as of January 1, 2008 of the change in accounting principle
was a decrease to long-term debt of approximately $0.5 million for the discount
on the subordinated notes, an increase to additional contributed capital of
approximately $7.0 million, a decrease to retained earnings of approximately
$6.7 million and an increase to deferred tax liability of approximately $0.2
million. Interest expense for the three months ended March 30, 2008 was adjusted
to reflect amortization of the convertible debt discount. The following table
summarizes the effects of FSP APB 14-1’s provisions on CTS’ Statement of
Earnings for the three months ended March 30, 2008:
Three
months ended March 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
As
originally reported
|
As
adjusted
|
Effect
of change in accounting principle
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
$
|
1,059
|
$
|
1,678
|
$
|
619
|
||||||
Tax
expense
|
1,881
|
1,631
|
(250
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
6,666
|
6,297
|
(369
|
)
|
||||||||
Earnings
per share-basic
|
0.20
|
0.19
|
(0.01
|
)
|
||||||||
Earnings
per share-fully diluted
|
0.18
|
0.18
|
—
|
The
principal amount of the liability component at March 29, 2009 and December 31,
2008 are $32.5 million and the unamortized discounts are approximately $0.1
million and $0.5 million, respectively. The remaining amortization period of the
debt discount at March 29, 2009 is approximately one month. The amounts related
to the equity component, net of equity issue costs and deferred tax, at March
29, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are approximately $7.0 million.
The
effective interest rate on CTS’ 2.125% subordinated debentures is 7%. The amount
of interest recognized for the periods ended March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008
was approximately $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The $0.5 million
of interest expense recognized in the first quarter of 2009 comprised of
approximately $0.4 million of interest expense due to the amortization of the
discount on the debt and $0.1 million of interest expense due to the contractual
interest coupon. The $1.0 million of interest expense recognized in the first
quarter of 2008 comprised of approximately $0.6 million of interest expense due
to the amortization of the discount on the debt and $0.4 million of interest
expense due to the contractual interest coupon.
NOTE
F – Retirement Plans
Net
pension (income) / postretirement expense for the three months ended March 29,
2009 and March 30, 2008 includes the following components:
Pension
Plans
|
Other
Postretirement
Benefit
Plans
|
|||||||||||||||
($ in
thousands)
|
March 29, 2009
|
March 30,
2008
|
March 29,
2009
|
March 30,
2008
|
||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 779 | $ | 887 | $ | 3 | $ | 5 | ||||||||
Interest
cost
|
3,432 | 3,297 | 78 | 92 | ||||||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets (1)
|
(6,096 | ) | (6,597 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
126 | 135 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of loss/(gain)
|
1,221 | 429 | (25 | ) | — | |||||||||||
(Income)/expense,
net
|
$ | (538 | ) | $ | (1,849 | ) | $ | 56 | $ | 97 |
______________________________________
(1) Expected return on plan assets is
net of expected investment expenses and certain administrative
expenses.
NOTE G – Segments
FAS
No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information”, requires companies to provide certain information about their
operating segments. CTS has two reportable segments: 1) EMS and 2)
Components and Sensors.
EMS
includes the higher level assembly of electronic and mechanical components into
a finished subassembly or assembly performed under a contract manufacturing
agreement with an original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") or other contract
manufacturer. Additionally, for some customers, CTS provides full
turnkey manufacturing and completion including design, bill-of-material
management, logistics, and repair.
Components
and sensors are products which perform specific electronic functions for a given
product family and are intended for use in customer assemblies. Components
and sensors consist principally of automotive sensors and actuators used in
commercial or consumer vehicles; electronic components used in communications
infrastructure and computer markets; terminators, including ClearONE™
terminators, used in computer and other high speed applications, switches,
resistor networks, and potentiometers used to serve multiple
markets.
The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described
in the summary of significant accounting policies in the Company’s annual report
on Form 10-K. Management evaluates performance based upon segment
operating earnings before restructuring and restructuring-related charges,
goodwill impairment, interest expense, other non-operating income, and income
tax expense.
Summarized
financial information concerning CTS’ reportable segments is shown in the
following table:
($
in thousands)
|
EMS
|
Components and
Sensors
|
Total
|
|||||||||
First
Quarter of 2009
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$ | 75,822 | $ | 42,309 | $ | 118,131 | ||||||
Segment
operating (loss)/earnings
|
3,264 | (3,408 | ) | (144 | ) | |||||||
Total
assets
|
139,597 | 296,063 | 435,660 | |||||||||
First
Quarter of 2008
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales to external customers
|
$ | 94,968 | $ | 77,787 | $ | 172,755 | ||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
2,030 | 6,775 | 8,805 | |||||||||
Total
assets
|
187,642 | 394,602 | 582,244 |
Reconciling
information between reportable segments’ operating earnings and CTS’
consolidated pre-tax income is shown in the following table:
($
in thousands)
|
First
Quarter
2009
|
First
Quarter
2008
|
||||||
Total
segment operating (loss)/earnings
|
$ | (144 | ) | $ | 8,805 | |||
Restructuring
and restructuring-related charges
|
(2,243 | ) | (424 | ) | ||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
(33,153 | ) | — | |||||
Interest
expense
|
(888 | ) | (1,678 | ) | ||||
Interest
income
|
70 | 478 | ||||||
Other
(expense)/income
|
(321 | ) | 747 | |||||
(Loss)/earnings
before income taxes
|
$ | (36,679 | ) | $ | 7,928 |
NOTE H –
Contingencies
Certain
processes in the manufacture of CTS’ current and past products create hazardous
waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and
regulations. CTS has been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator groups, that
it is or may be a potentially responsible party regarding hazardous waste
remediation at several non-CTS sites. In addition to these non-CTS sites,
CTS has an ongoing practice of providing reserves for probable remediation
activities at certain of its manufacturing locations and for claims and
proceedings against CTS with respect to other environmental matters. In
the opinion of management, based upon presently available information relating
to all such matters, either adequate provision for probable costs has been made,
or the ultimate costs resulting will not materially affect the consolidated
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of CTS.
Certain
claims are pending against CTS with respect to matters arising out of the
ordinary conduct of its business. For all claims, in the opinion of
management, based upon presently available information, either adequate
provision for anticipated costs has been made or the ultimate anticipated costs
resulting will not materially affect CTS’ consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE
I – Restructuring
In
November 2007, CTS announced plans to realign certain manufacturing operations
and eliminate approximately 103 net positions during the fourth quarter of
2007. The realignment is intended to create synergies by further
enhancing the Company’s shared services model to include manufacturing support
functions at its locations that serve more than one business. As of
December 31, 2007, the realignment plans were substantially
complete.
The
following table displays the planned restructuring and restructuring-related
charges associated with the realignment, as well as a summary of the actual
costs incurred through December 31, 2008:
($ in
millions)
November 2007 Plan
|
Planned
Costs
|
Actual incurred
through
December
31, 2008
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Workforce
reduction
|
$ | 1.7 | $ | 1.5 | ||||
Asset
impairments
|
0.9 | 1.2 | ||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
2.6 | 2.7 | ||||||
Equipment
relocation
|
0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
Other
costs
|
0.2 | 0.4 | ||||||
Restructuring-related
costs
|
0.4 | 0.5 | ||||||
Total
restructuring and restructuring-related costs
|
$ | 3.0 | $ | 3.2 |
Of the
restructuring and restructuring-related costs incurred, $0.9 million relates to
the Components and Sensors segment and $2.3 million relates to the EMS
segment. Restructuring charges are reported on a separate line on the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and the
restructuring-related costs are included in cost of goods
sold. During the first quarter of 2008 we incurred $0.2 million of
restructuring charges and $0.3 million of restructuring-related
costs. Restructuring actions were completed during the second quarter
of 2008. There was no restructuring reserve related to this plan at
December 31, 2008.
In
September 2008, CTS initiated certain restructuring actions to transfer and
consolidate certain operations to further improve its cost
structure. These actions resulted in the elimination of approximately
400 positions and the write-off of certain leasehold improvements during the
second half of 2008. These actions were substantially complete in
December 2008.
The
following table displays the planned restructuring and restructuring-related
charges associated with the realignment, as well as a summary of the actual
costs incurred through December 31, 2008:
($ in
millions)
September 2008 Plan
|
Planned
Costs
|
Actual
incurred
through
December
31, 2008
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Workforce
reduction
|
$ | 2.4 | $ | 3.9 | ||||
Asset
impairments
|
1.1 | 1.2 | ||||||
Other
charges
|
0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
3.7 | 5.2 | ||||||
Equipment
and employee relocation
|
0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
Other
costs
|
0.5 | 0.2 | ||||||
Restructuring-related
costs
|
0.7 | 0.3 | ||||||
Total
restructuring and restructuring-related costs
|
$ | 4.4 | $ | 5.5 |
Of the
restructuring and restructuring-related costs incurred, $4.8 million relates to
the Components and Sensors segment and $0.7 million relates to the EMS
segment. Restructuring charges are reported on a separate line on the
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings and the restructuring-related
costs are included in cost of goods sold. Restructuring actions were
completed during the fourth quarter of 2008.
The
following table displays the restructuring reserve activity related to the
realignment for the period ended March 29, 2009:
($ in
millions) September
2008 Plan
|
||||
Restructuring
liability at January 1, 2009
|
$
|
1.7
|
||
Restructuring
and restructuring-related charges, excluding asset impairments and
write-offs
|
—
|
|||
Cost
paid
|
(1.7
|
)
|
||
Restructuring
liability at March 29, 2009
|
$
|
—
|
In March
2009, CTS initiated certain restructuring actions to reorganize certain
operations to further improve its cost structure. These actions
resulted in the elimination of approximately 268 positions.
The
following table displays the planned restructuring and restructuring-related
charges associated with the realignment, as well as a summary of the actual
costs incurred through March 29, 2009:
($ in
millions) March
2009 Plan
|
Planned
Costs
|
Actual
incurred through
March
29, 2009
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
Workforce
reduction
|
$ | 1.9 | $ | 2.1 | ||||
Asset
impairments
|
— | 0.1 | ||||||
Total
restructuring and impairment charge
|
$ | 1.9 | $ | 2.2 |
Of the
restructuring and impairment costs incurred, $2.1 million relates to the
Components and Sensors segment and $0.1 million relates to the EMS
segment. Restructuring charges are reported on a separate line on the
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Earnings and the restructuring-related
costs are included in cost of goods sold.
The
following table displays the restructuring reserve activity related to the
realignment for the period ended March 29, 2009:
($
in millions) March 2009
Plan
|
||||
Restructuring
liability at January 1, 2009
|
$
|
—
|
||
Restructuring
and restructuring-related charges, excluding asset impairments and
write-offs
|
2.1
|
|||
Cost
paid
|
(0.4
|
)
|
||
Restructuring
liability at March 29, 2009
|
$
|
1.7
|
NOTE
J – Fair Value Measurements
Goodwill
represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In accordance with the provisions
of FAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS No. 142”), CTS does
not amortize goodwill, but tests it for impairment annually using a fair value
approach at the “reporting unit” level. A reporting unit is the operating
segment, or a business one level below that operating segment (the “component”
level) if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by
senior management. However, components are aggregated as a single reporting unit
if they have similar economic characteristics. The Company performed its annual
impairment test as of December 31, 2008 and concluded that no impairment existed
at that date.
FAS No.
142 also stipulates that goodwill of a reporting unit shall be tested for
impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that
would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below the
carrying amount. To measure the amount of an impairment loss, FAS No. 142
prescribes a two-step method. The first step requires the Company to determine
the fair value of the reporting unit and compare that fair value to the net book
value of the reporting unit. At March 29, 2009 the fair value of equity of CTS'
reporting units is approximately $161.6 million. The fair value of the
reporting unit is determined using various valuation techniques, including a
discounted cash flow analysis (an income approach) and a market approach which
uses current industry information. The second step requires the Company to
determine the implied fair value of goodwill and measure the impairment loss as
the difference between the book value of the goodwill and the implied fair value
of the goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill must be determined in the
same manner as if CTS had acquired those reporting units.
In light
of a continuous decline in CTS’ market capitalization in the first quarter of
2009, CTS determined that an interim impairment test was necessary at the end of
the first quarter of 2009 for two of its reporting units. After completing
step one of the prescribed test, CTS determined that the estimated fair values
of both reporting units were less than their book values on March 29, 2009. CTS
performed the step two test and concluded that the reporting units’ goodwill
were impaired. As a result, an impairment loss of $33.2 million was recorded in
the first quarter of 2009. Of the $33.2 million impairment loss, $30.8 million
was related to the EMS segment and $2.4 million was related to the
Components and Sensors segment. This non-cash goodwill impairment has
no impact on CTS’ debt covenants. CTS’ goodwill is classified
within level three of the fair value hierarchy as defined in FAS No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements”.
The
following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of CTS’ goodwill
for the periods ended March 9, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
EMS
|
Components
& Sensors
|
Total
CTS
|
||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2008
|
24,144
|
513
|
24,657
|
|||||||||
Tusonix
acquisition
|
—
|
1,857
|
1,857
|
|||||||||
Orion
acquisition
|
6,636
|
—
|
6,636
|
|||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
30,780
|
2,370
|
33,150
|
|||||||||
Purchase
accounting adjustment
|
—
|
3
|
3
|
|||||||||
Impairment
loss
|
(30,780
|
)
|
(2,373
|
)
|
(33,153
|
)
|
||||||
Balance
at March 29, 2009
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
CTS has
the following other intangible assets and goodwill as of:
March
29, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
||||||||||||
Amortized
intangible assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Customer
lists/relationships
|
$
|
51,084
|
$
|
(15,663
|
)
|
$
|
51,084
|
$
|
(15,038
|
)
|
||||||
Patents
|
10,319
|
(10,154
|
)
|
10,319
|
(9,886
|
)
|
||||||||||
Other
intangibles
|
500
|
(66
|
)
|
500
|
(52
|
)
|
||||||||||
Total
|
61,903
|
(25,883
|
)
|
61,903
|
(24,976
|
)
|
||||||||||
Goodwill
|
—
|
—
|
33,150
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Total
other intangible assets and goodwill
|
$
|
61,903
|
$
|
(25,883
|
)
|
$
|
95,053
|
$
|
(24,976
|
)
|
Of the
net intangible assets at March 29, 2009, $8.4 million relates to the EMS segment
and $27.6 million relates to the Components and Sensors segment. CTS recorded
amortization expense of $0.9 million during each of the quarters ended March 29,
2009 and March 30, 2008. CTS estimates remaining amortization expense
of $2.1 million in 2009, $2.5 million in 2010, $2.4 million in years 2011
through 2013, and $24.3 million thereafter.
NOTE
K – (Loss)/Earnings Per Share
FAS
No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” requires companies to provide a
reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS) computations. The calculations below provide net
earnings, average common shares outstanding, and the resultant earnings per
share for both basic and diluted EPS for the quarters ending March 29, 2009 and
March 30, 2008.
($
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Net
Earnings (Numerator)
|
Shares
(in
thousands) (Denominator)
|
Per Share
Amount
|
|||||||||
First
Quarter 2009
|
||||||||||||
Basic
loss per share
|
$ | (35,649 | ) | 33,744 | $ | (1.06 | ) | |||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||
Convertible
debt
|
— | — | ||||||||||
Equity-based
compensation plans
|
— | — | ||||||||||
Diluted
loss per share
|
$ | (35,649 | ) | 33,744 |
$
|
(1.06 | ) | |||||
First
Quarter 2008
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ | 6,297 | 33,845 | $ | 0.19 | |||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||
Convertible
debt
|
631 | 4,000 | ||||||||||
Equity-based
compensation plans
|
— | 490 | ||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | 6,928 | 38,335 | $ | 0.18 |
The
following table shows the potentially dilutive securities which have been
excluded from the first quarter 2009 and 2008 dilutive earnings per share
calculation because they are either anti-dilutive, or the exercise price exceeds
the average market price.
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
(Number
of shares in thousands)
|
March
29,
2009
|
March 30,
2008
|
||||||
Stock
options where the assumed proceeds exceed the average market price of
common shares during the period
|
1,285 | 666 | ||||||
Restricted
Stock Units
|
495 | — | ||||||
Securities
related to the subordinated convertible debt
|
2,167 | — |
NOTE
L – Treasury Stock
In June
2007, CTS’ Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to two
million shares of common stock in the open market. The authorization
expires on June 30, 2009. Reacquired shares were used to support
equity-based compensation programs and for other corporate
purposes. Since June 2007, CTS has repurchased 2,000,000 shares at a
total cost of $22.2 million, which completed this program.
In May
2008, CTS’ Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to one
million shares of its common stock in the open market at a maximum price of $13
per share. Reacquired shares will be used to support equity-based
compensation programs and for other corporate purposes. Since May
2008, CTS has repurchased 22,500 shares at a total cost of $0.2
million. No shares were repurchased under this program during the
first quarter of 2009.
NOTE
M – Income Taxes
The
effective tax rate as reported for the first quarter of 2009 was
2.8%. This rate includes a discrete period tax benefit of $0.2
million related to our goodwill impairment. Excluding this discrete
item the full year 2009 tax rate is 23.4%.
The
following table shows the effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 and
illustrates the impact on the tax rate from the discrete period tax
benefit:
($
in thousands)
|
As
reported
|
Discrete item goodwill
impairment
|
Net loss before goodwill
impairment
|
|||||||||
Pre-tax
loss
|
$ | (36,679 | ) | $ | (33,153 | ) | $ | (3,526 | ) | |||
Tax
benefit
|
(1,030 | ) | (205 | ) | (825 | ) | ||||||
Net
loss
|
(35,649 | ) | (32,948 | ) | (2,701 | ) | ||||||
First
quarter 2009 effective tax rate as reported
|
2.8 | % | ||||||||||
Full
year 2009 tax rate excluding the discrete item
|
23.4 | % |
NOTE
N – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB
Staff Position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May
Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)”
In May
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial
Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”). FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers of such
instruments to separately account for the liability and equity components in a
manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when
interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP APB 14-1 should be
applied retrospectively to all past periods presented even if the instrument has
matured, has been converted, or has otherwise been extinguished as of FSP APB
14-1’s effective date. CTS adopted the provisions of FSP APB 14-1
beginning January 1, 2009. The provisions of FSP APB 14-1 did not have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB
Staff Position FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets”
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”) which amends the list of
factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No.
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS No. 142”). FSP FAS 142-3
applies to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of
assets and intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset
acquisitions. FSP FAS 142-3 removes the provision under FAS No. 142 that
requires an entity to consider whether the renewal or extension can be
accomplished without substantial cost or material modifications of the existing
terms and conditions associated with the asset. Instead, FSP FAS 142-3 requires
that an entity consider its own experience in renewing similar arrangements. An
entity would consider market participant assumptions regarding renewal if no
such relevant experience exists. CTS adopted the provisions of FSP
FAS 142-3 beginning January 1, 2009. The provisions of FSP FAS 142-3 do not have
a material impact on CTS’ consolidated financial statements.
FASB
Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets”
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”),
which expands the disclosures required by employers for postretirement plan
assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires plan sponsors to provide extensive new
disclosures about assets in defined benefit postretirement benefit plans as well
as any concentrations of associated risks. In addition, this FSP requires new
disclosures similar to those in FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, in terms
of the three-level fair value hierarchy, including a reconciliation of the
beginning and ending balances of plan assets that fall within Level 3 of the
hierarchy. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for periods ending after December 15,
2009.
FASB
Staff Position FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities
Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies”
In April
2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies” (“FSP FAS 141(R)-1”), which applies to all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies that
would be within the scope of FAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (“FAS No.
5”), if not acquired or assumed in a business combination, except for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies that are subject to specific guidance in
FAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“FAS No. 141-(R)”). FSP FAS 141(R)-1
requires an acquirer to recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an
asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from
a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can
be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value
cannot be determined during the measurement period, the asset or liability shall
be recognized at the acquisition date if it is probable that the asset existed
or that a liability has been incurred at the acquisition date and the amount of
the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. This FSP is effective for
assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. CTS does not expect
the provisions of FSP FAS 141(R)-1 to have a material impact on its financial
statements.
FASB
Staff Position 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments”
In April
2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-2”), to
require fair value disclosures of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods for publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to
require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim
reporting periods and is effective for interim reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. The provisions of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will not have a material
impact on CTS’ financial statements.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A")
Overview
CTS
Corporation (“we”, “our”, “us”) is a global manufacturer of components and
sensors used primarily in the automotive, communications and computer
markets. We also provide electronic manufacturing solutions,
including design and supply chain management functions, primarily serving the
communications, computer, industrial, medical and defense and aerospace markets
under contract arrangements with the original equipment manufacturers
(“OEMs”).
The
difficult global economic environment is negatively affecting demand for many of
our customers’ products, especially in our higher margin Components and Sensors
segment. In the first quarter 2009, we recorded a year-over-year
sales decrease from the same quarter last year, mainly due to the global
economic and credit crisis. Revenue trends in the first quarter 2009
reflected a continuation and deepening of the negative trends that began to
impact us in the fourth quarter 2008. We expect these trends to
continue at least through the second quarter 2009. In response to
these trends, we initiated additional restructuring actions to reorganize
certain operations to further improve our cost structure. These
actions resulted in the elimination of approximately 268 positions with a cost
of $2.2 million in the quarter.
As a
result of the significant and sustained decline in our market capitalization
during the quarter, which was driven largely by deteriorating macroeconomic
conditions worldwide as discussed above, we recorded a non-cash charge of $33.2
million in the first quarter 2009, to write-off the entire carrying value of our
goodwill. Of the $33.2 million impairment, $30.8 million was related
to the Electronics Manufacturing Services (“EMS”) segment and $2.4 million was
related to the Components and Sensors segment. The goodwill
impairment charge does not affect our liquidity, current or future cash flows or
debt covenants. See Note J, “Fair Value Measurements”, for further
discussion on goodwill.
As
discussed in more detail throughout the MD&A:
·
|
Total
sales in the first quarter 2009 of $118.1 million were reported through
two segments, EMS and Components and Sensors. Sales decreased
by $54.6 million, or 31.6%, in the first quarter of 2009 from the first
quarter of 2008. Sales in the Components and Sensors segment
decreased by 45.6% versus the first quarter of 2008, while sales in the
EMS segment decreased by 20.2% compared to the first quarter of
2008.
|
·
|
Gross
margins, as a percent of sales, were 16.8% and 19.6% in the first quarters
of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Components and Sensors
segment, which inherently generates a higher gross margin, decreased to
35.8% of total company sales in the first quarter of 2009 compared to
45.0% of total sales in the same period of
2008.
|
·
|
Selling,
general and administrative (“SG&A”) and research and development
("R&D") expenses were $20.0 million in the first quarter of 2009
compared to $25.3 million in the first quarter of 2008. This
significant reduction reflects our proactive management of costs,
including restructuring actions cost-cutting measures and a greater than
$2.0 million decrease in discretionary
spending.
|
·
|
Interest
and other expense in the first quarter of 2009 was $1.1 million versus
$0.5 million in the same quarter of
2008.
|
·
|
The
effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2009 was 2.8%. This
rate includes a discrete period tax benefit of $0.2 million related to our
goodwill impairment. Excluding this discrete item the full year
tax rate is 23.4%. Refer to Note M, “Income Taxes”, for further
details.
|
·
|
Net
loss was $35.6 million, or $1.06 per diluted share, in the first quarter
of 2009, including $33.2 million, or $0.98 per diluted share, for non-cash
goodwill impairment and $2.2 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, of
restructuring charges. This compares with net
income of $6.3 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, in the first quarter
of 2008.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Management
believes that judgment and estimates related to the following critical
accounting policies could materially affect our consolidated financial
statements:
·
|
Inventory
valuation, the allowance for doubtful accounts, and other accrued
liabilities
|
·
|
Long-lived
and intangible assets valuation, and depreciation/amortization
periods
|
·
|
Income
taxes
|
·
|
Retirement
plans
|
·
|
Equity-based
compensation
|
In the
first quarter of 2009, there were no changes in the above critical accounting
policies.
Results of
Operations
Comparison
of First Quarter 2009 and First Quarter 2008
Segment
Discussion
Refer to
Note G, “Segments”, for a description of the Company’s segments.
The
following table highlights the segment results for the three-month periods
ending March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008:
($
in thousands)
|
Components
& Sensors
|
EMS
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|||||||||
First
Quarter 2009
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
$
|
42,309
|
$
|
75,822
|
$
|
118,131
|
||||||
Segment
operating (loss)/earnings
|
(3,408
|
)
|
3,264
|
(144
|
)
|
|||||||
%
of sales
|
(8.1
|
)%
|
4.3
|
%
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
||||||
First
Quarter 2008
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
$
|
77,787
|
$
|
94,968
|
$
|
172,755
|
||||||
Segment
operating earnings
|
6,775
|
2,030
|
8,805
|
|||||||||
%
of sales
|
8.7
|
%
|
2.1
|
%
|
5.1
|
%
|
Sales in
the Components and Sensors segment decreased $35.5 million, or 45.6% from the
first quarter of 2008, attributed primarily to decreased sales in the automotive
market and lower electronic component sales for infrastructure
applications.
The
Components and Sensors segment recorded an operating loss of $3.4 million in the
first quarter of 2009 versus earnings of $6.8 million in the first quarter of
2008. The unfavorable earnings change resulted from the negative
impact of lower sales. This impact was mitigated in part by our
proactive management of costs, including restructuring actions and cost-cutting
measures in the areas of compensation, such as employee furloughs, suspension of
401(k) company match and salary increases, temporary salary reductions and a
greater than $2.0 million decrease in discretionary spending.
Sales in
the EMS segment decreased $19.1 million, or 20.2%, in the first quarter of 2009
versus the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in sales was primarily
attributable to expected end-of-life (“EOL”) driven lower sales to
Hewlett-Packard, partially offset by higher sales in the defense and aerospace
and medical markets.
EMS
segment operating earnings were $3.3 million in the first quarter of 2009 versus
$2.0 million in the first quarter of 2008. The favorable earnings
change was primarily due to more favorable product mix and lower operating costs
resulting from recent restructuring actions, partially offset by the negative
impact of lower sales.
Total
Company Discussion
The
following table highlights changes in significant components of the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three-month periods ended
March 29, 2009 and March 30, 2008:
Three
months ended
|
||||||||||||
($
in thousands, except net earnings per share)
|
March
29, 2009
|
March
30, 2008
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
118,131
|
$
|
172,755
|
$
|
(54,624
|
)
|
|||||
Restructuring-related
costs
|
—
|
274
|
(274
|
)
|
||||||||
%
of net sales
|
—
|
%
|
0.2
|
%
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
||||||
Gross
margin
|
19,829
|
33,824
|
(13,995
|
)
|
||||||||
%
of net sales
|
16.8
|
%
|
19.6
|
%
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
16,620
|
20,976
|
(4,356
|
)
|
||||||||
%
of net sales
|
14.1
|
%
|
12.1
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
3,353
|
4,317
|
(964
|
)
|
||||||||
%
of net sales
|
2.8
|
%
|
2.5
|
%
|
0.3
|
%
|
||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
2,243
|
150
|
2,093
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
1.9
|
%
|
0.1
|
%
|
1.8
|
%
|
||||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
33,153
|
—
|
33,153
|
|||||||||
%
of net sales
|
28.1
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
28.1
|
%
|
||||||
Operating
earnings
|
(35,540
|
)
|
8,381
|
(43,921
|
)
|
|||||||
%
of net sales
|
(30.1
|
)%
|
4.9
|
%
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
||||||
Income
tax (benefit)/expense
|
(1,030
|
)
|
1,631
|
(2,661
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
(35,649
|
)
|
6,297
|
(41,946
|
)
|
|||||||
%
of net sales
|
(30.2
|
)%
|
3.6
|
%
|
(33.8
|
)%
|
||||||
Net
(loss)/earnings per diluted share
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
$
|
0.18
|
$
|
(1.24
|
)
|
||||
First
quarter sales of $118.1 million decreased $54.6 million, or 31.6%, from the
first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to the
Components and Sensors segment, with lower sales of $35.5 million primarily in
the automotive market. EMS segment sales decreased $19.1 million from
expected EOL-driven lower sales to Hewlett-Packard, partially offset by higher
sales in the defense and aerospace market and medical markets.
Gross
margin as a percent of sales was 16.8% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to
19.6% in the first quarter of 2008 due to operational inefficiencies on
significantly lower sales volumes, lower pension income in the Components and
Sensors segment and unfavorable segment sales mix. The Components and
Sensors segment, which inherently generates a higher gross margin, decreased to
35.8% of total company sales in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 45.0% of
total sales in the same period of 2008.
SG&A
expenses were $16.6 million, or 14.1% of sales, in the first quarter of 2009
versus $21.0 million, or 12.1% of sales, in the first quarter of
2008. This significant reduction of $4.4 million reflects our
proactive management of costs, including restructuring actions, cost-cutting
measures and a greater than $2.0 million decrease in discretionary
spending.
R&D
expenses were $3.4 million, or 2.8% of sales in the first quarter of 2009 versus
$4.3 million, or 2.5% of sales in the first quarter of 2008. R&D
expenses are incurred by the Components and Sensors segment and are primarily
focused on expanded applications and new product development, as well as current
product and process enhancements.
U.S. GAAP
rules require all public companies to test their recorded goodwill asset for
impairment on an annual basis. We performed our annual impairment test as
of December 31, 2008. The typical and traditional testing method
requires determination of the fair value of the underlying assets by utilizing a
discounted cash flow analysis based on our most current long-term financial
forecasts, combined with a market approach which uses current industry
information. As of December 2008, the SEC also suggested that a company's
stock price and related market capitalization (stock price times shares
outstanding) needed to be emphasized and reconciled to the traditional method of
goodwill testing. Therefore, due to our declining stock price during the
first quarter of 2009, we were required to test goodwill for impairment again at
the end of March 2009. The goodwill testing performed indicated that
impairment did exist and all of our goodwill asset of $33.2 million needed to be
written off. The goodwill impairment charge does not affect our liquidity,
current or future cash flows or debt covenants.
Operating
loss was $35.5 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to earnings of $8.4
million in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in operating
earnings was primarily attributable to a $33.2 million goodwill impairment
charge discussed above. First quarter 2009 operating loss also
included approximately $2.2 million of restructuring costs associated with the
restructuring actions announced in March 2009. Comparatively, first
quarter 2008 operating earnings included approximately $0.4 million of
restructuring and restructuring-related costs associated with the realignment of
operations announced in November 2007. See Note I, “Restructuring”,
for further discussion on restructuring and realignment actions.
Interest
and other expense in 2009 was $1.1 million versus $0.5 million in
2008. The additional expense resulted from foreign currency exchange
losses of $0.4 million in 2009 versus a gain of $0.7 million in 2008 and $0.4
million lower interest income from lower interest rates on lower cash balances,
partially offset by a decrease in interest expense of $0.8 million. The decrease
in interest expense was primarily due to lower interest rates on outstanding
debt.
Income
taxes for the first quarter of 2009 were calculated using an estimated full-year
rate of 23.4%, excluding the tax effects related to the goodwill impairment,
compared to 20.6% for the first quarter of 2008. There were no
material changes to the amount of unrecognized FIN 48 tax benefits, interest or
penalties during the first quarter of 2009.
Net loss
was $35.6 million, or $1.06 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2009
compared with earnings of $6.3 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, in the first
quarter of 2008.
Outlook
With the
uncertainty of market conditions and very limited visibility by customers in the
current environment, we are not in a position to provide specific sales and
earnings guidance at this time. During this global recession, we
continue to take actions designed to keep CTS’ pretax earnings positive over the
remainder of 2009.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Overview
Cash and
cash equivalents were $44.6 million at March 29, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Total debt on March 29, 2009 was $86.1 million, compared to $80.0 million at the
end of 2008, as we increased debt primarily to fund operations. Total
debt as a percentage of total capitalization was 26.2% at the end of the first
quarter of 2009, compared with 22.4% at the end of 2008. Total debt
as a percentage of total capitalization is defined as the sum of notes payable,
current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt as a percentage of total
debt and shareholders’ equity.
Working
capital increased $6.2 million in the first quarter of 2009 versus year-end
2008, primarily due to decreases in accounts payable of $17.9 million and income
taxes payable of $3.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in accounts
receivable of $17.4 million, all resulting from relatively lower business
activity during the quarter. The non-cash goodwill impairment charge
in first quarter 2009 had no impact on working capital.
Cash
Flow
Operating
Activities
Net cash
used by operating activities was $4.0 million during the first quarter of
2009. This resulted primarily from a reduction in our accounts
payable and accrued liabilities of $25.2 million and a reduction in our accounts
receivable of $17.3 million.
Net cash
used by operating activities was $5.5 million during the first quarter of
2008. This resulted primarily from a reduction in our accounts
payable and accrued liabilities of $13.9 million and an increase in our accounts
receivable of $3.5 million due to strong sales outpacing collections in the
quarter.
Investing
Activities
Net cash
used in investing activities was $1.2 million for the first quarter of 2009,
primarily for capital expenditures.
Net cash
used in investing activities was $24.1 million for the first quarter of 2008,
including $20.6 million to complete acquisitions and $3.5 million for capital
expenditures.
Financing
Activities
Net cash
provided by financing activities for the first quarter of 2009 was $4.7 million,
consisting primarily of a net increase in long-term debt of $5.5 million, offset
by $1.0 million in dividend payments. The additional debt was
primarily used to fund operations in the quarter.
Net cash
provided by financing activities for the first quarter of 2008 was $35.9
million, consisting primarily of a net increase in long-term debt of $44.7
million, offset by $6.8 million for purchase of CTS common stock and $1.0
million in dividend payments.
Capital
Resources
Refer to
Note E, “Debt,” for further discussion.
On June
27, 2006, we entered into a $100 million, unsecured revolving credit
agreement. Under the terms of the revolving credit agreement, we can
expand the credit facility to $150 million, subject to participating banks’
approval. There was $53.5 million and $48.0 million outstanding under
the revolving credit agreement at March 29, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. At March 29, 2009, we had $46.5 million available under
this agreement. Interest rates on the revolving credit agreement fluctuate based
upon LIBOR and our quarterly total leverage ratio. We pay a
commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit
agreement. The commitment fee varies based on the quarterly leverage
ratio and was 0.15 percent per annum at March 29, 2009. The revolving
credit agreement requires, among other things, that we comply with a maximum
total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Our
failure to comply with these covenants could reduce the borrowing availability
under the revolving credit agreement. We were in compliance with all
debt covenants at March 29, 2009. The revolving credit agreement
requires us to deliver quarterly financial statements, annual financial
statements, auditors certifications and compliance certificates within a
specified number of days after the end of a quarter and year-end. Additionally,
the revolving agreement contains restrictions limiting our ability to: dispose
of assets; incur certain additional debt; repay other debt or amend subordinated
debt instruments; create liens on assets; make investments, loans or advances;
make acquisitions or engage in mergers or consolidations; engage in certain
transactions with our subsidiaries and affiliates; and the amounts allowed for
stock repurchases and dividend payments. The revolving credit agreement expires
in June 2011.
We have
$32.5 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated debentures
(“2.125% Debentures”). These unsecured debentures bear interest at an annual
rate of 2.125%, payable semiannually on May 1 and November 1 of each year
through the maturity date of May 1, 2024. The 2.125% Debentures are convertible,
under certain circumstances, into CTS common stock at a conversion price of
$15.00 per share (which is equivalent to an initial conversion rate of
approximately 66.6667 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the notes). Upon
conversion of the 2.125% Debentures, in lieu of delivering common stock, we may,
at our discretion, deliver cash or a combination of cash and common
stock.
In May
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial
Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”) that required issues of such instruments to
separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will
reflect the entity’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is
recognized in subsequent periods. FSP APB 14-1 must be applied retrospectively
to all past periods presented even if the instrument has matured, has been
converted, or has otherwise been extinguished as of FSP APB 14-1’s effective
date of January 1, 2009. We adopted the provisions of this FSP in relation to
its 2.125% subordinated debentures effective January 1, 2009 and the financial
statements presented reflect the provisions of FSP APB 14-1.
The
principal amount of the liability component at March 29, 2009 and December 31,
2008 are $32.5 million and the unamortized discounts are approximately $0.1
million and $0.5 million, respectively. The remaining amortization period of the
debt discount at March 29, 2009 is approximately one month. The amounts related
to the equity component, net of equity issue costs and deferred tax, at March
29, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are approximately $7.0 million.
Under FSP
APB 14-1, the effective interest rate on our 2.125% subordinated debentures is
7%. The amount of interest recognized for the periods ended March 29, 2009 and
March 30, 2008 was approximately $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
The $0.5 million of interest expense recognized in the first quarter of 2009
comprised of approximately $0.4 million of interest expense due to the
amortization of the discount on the debt and $0.1 million of interest expense
due to the contractual interest coupon. The $1.0 million of interest expense
recognized in the first quarter of 2008 comprised of approximately $0.6 million
of interest expense due to the amortization of the discount on the debt and $0.4
million of interest expense due to the contractual interest coupon.
In May
2008, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to one
million shares of CTS common stock in the open market at a maximum price of $13
per share. The authorization expires on June 30,
2009. Reacquired shares will be used to support equity-based
compensation programs and for other corporate purposes. Since May
2008, we have repurchased 22,500 shares at a total cost of $0.2
million.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
FASB
Staff Position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May
Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)”
In May
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial
Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”). FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers of such
instruments to separately account for the liability and equity components in a
manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when
interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP APB 14-1 should be
applied retrospectively to all past periods presented even if the instrument has
matured, has been converted, or has otherwise been extinguished as of FSP APB
14-1’s effective date. CTS adopted the provisions of FSP APB 14-1
beginning January 1, 2009. The provisions of FSP APB 14-1 did not have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB
Staff Position FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets”
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”) which amends the list of
factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No.
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS No. 142”). FSP FAS 142-3
applies to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of
assets and intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset
acquisitions. FSP FAS 142-3 removes the provision under FAS No. 142 that
requires an entity to consider whether the renewal or extension can be
accomplished without substantial cost or material modifications of the existing
terms and conditions associated with the asset. Instead, FSP FAS 142-3 requires
that an entity consider its own experience in renewing similar arrangements. An
entity would consider market participant assumptions regarding renewal if no
such relevant experience exists. CTS adopted the provisions of FSP
FAS 142-3 beginning January 1, 2009. The provisions of FSP FAS 142-3 do not have
a material impact on CTS’ consolidated financial statements.
FASB
Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets”
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”),
which expands the disclosures required by employers for postretirement plan
assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires plan sponsors to provide extensive new
disclosures about assets in defined benefit postretirement benefit plans as well
as any concentrations of associated risks. In addition, this FSP requires new
disclosures similar to those in FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, in terms
of the three-level fair value hierarchy, including a reconciliation of the
beginning and ending balances of plan assets that fall within Level 3 of the
hierarchy. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for periods ending after December 15,
2009.
FASB
Staff Position FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities
Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies”
In April
2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies” (“FSP FAS 141(R)-1”), which applies to all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies that
would be within the scope of FAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (“FAS No.
5”), if not acquired or assumed in a business combination, except for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies that are subject to specific guidance in
FAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“FAS No. 141-(R)”). FSP FAS 141(R)-1
requires an acquirer to recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an
asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from
a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can
be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value
cannot be determined during the measurement period, the asset or liability shall
be recognized at the acquisition date if it is probable that the asset existed
or that a liability has been incurred at the acquisition date and the amount of
the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. This FSP is effective for
assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. CTS does not expect
the provisions of FSP FAS 141(R)-1 to have a material impact on its financial
statements.
FASB
Staff Position 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments”
In April
2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-2”), to
require fair value disclosures of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods for publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to
require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim
reporting periods and is effective for interim reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. The provisions of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will not have a material
impact on CTS’ financial statements.
*****
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
document contains statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, any financial or other guidance, statements that reflect our current
expectations concerning future results and events, and any other statements that
are not based solely on historical fact. Forward-looking statements
are based on management’s expectations, certain assumptions and currently
available information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
hereof. These forward-looking statements are made subject to certain
risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause our actual results,
performance or achievements to differ materially from those presented in the
forward-looking statements. For more detailed information on the
risks and uncertainties associated with our business, see our reports filed with
the SEC. Examples of factors that may affect future operating results
and financial condition include, but are not limited to: rapid technological
change; general market conditions in the automotive, communications, and
computer industries, as well as conditions in the industrial, defense and
aerospace, and medical markets; reliance on key customers; the ability to
protect our intellectual property; pricing pressures and demand for our
products; and risks associated with our international operations, including
trade and tariff barriers, exchange rates and political and geopolitical risks;
and the impact of the accounting misstatements at its Moorpark and Santa Clara,
California locations, including the results of the impact of the SEC’s informal
inquiry into these misstatements. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update its forward-looking statements to reflect new information or
events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof, including market or
industry changes.
There
have been no other material changes in our market risk since December 31,
2008.
Item
4. Controls and
Procedures
|
Pursuant
to Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, management, under
the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such
evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 29, 2009,
provided that the evaluation did not include an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the internal control over financial reporting for the acquired business, as
described further below.
In
January 2008, we acquired Tusonix, Inc., which has facilities in Tucson, Arizona
and Nogales, Mexico. Each facility reports financial results that are
included in this report for the quarter ended March 29,
2009. Management has not made an assessment of the Tusonix
business’ internal control over financial reporting since the date of
acquisition. The Tusonix business’ assets and liabilities acquired
were $14.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively and the sales included in CTS’
2008 financial statements were approximately $14.0 million. The Tusonix business
was not included in our evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls
and procedures.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the quarter
ended March 29, 2009 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
|
Certain
processes in the manufacture of our current and past products create hazardous
waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and
regulations. We have been notified by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator
groups that it is or may be a potentially responsible party regarding hazardous
waste remediation at several non-CTS sites. In addition to these
non-CTS sites, we have an ongoing practice of providing reserves for probable
remediation activities at certain of our manufacturing locations and for claims
and proceedings against us with respect to other environmental
matters. In the opinion of management, based upon presently available
information relating to all such matters, either adequate provision for probable
costs has been made, or the ultimate costs resulting will not materially affect
the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of
CTS.
Certain
claims are pending against us with respect to matters arising out of the
ordinary conduct of our business. For all claims, in the opinion of
management, based upon presently available information, either adequate
provision for anticipated costs has been made by insurance, accruals or
otherwise, or the ultimate anticipated costs resulting will not materially
affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
During
2007, we were informed that the SEC is conducting an informal inquiry relating
to the 2006 accounting misstatements of our Moorpark and Santa Clara, California
manufacturing facilities. We are in full cooperation with the SEC in
its inquiry.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no significant changes to our risk factors since December 31,
2008.
The
following table summarizes the repurchases of CTS common stock made by the
Company during the three-month period ending March 29, 2009:
(a)
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
|
(b)
Average
Price
Paid
per Share
|
(c)
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of
Plans
or Programs
(1)
|
(d)
Maximum
Number
of
Shares
That
May
Yet
Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans
or Programs
|
|||||||||||||
977,500
|
||||||||||||||||
January
1, 2009 – March 29, 2009
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
977,500
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
In May 2008, CTS’ Board of
Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to one million shares of
its common stock in the open market. The authorization does not
expire.
|
Item
6. Exhibits
2009
– 2010 Performance Restricted Stock Unit Plan
|
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
CTS
Corporation
|
CTS
Corporation
|
||
/s/
Richard G. Cutter III
|
/s/
Donna L. Belusar
|
||
Richard
G. Cutter III
Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel
|
Donna
L. Belusar
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Dated: April 29, 2009 | Dated: April 29, 2009 |
28