CULP INC - Quarter Report: 2017 January (Form 10-Q)

---

---

Culp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Culp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “company”) include all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position.  All of these adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Results of operations for interim periods may not be indicative of future results.  The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, which are included in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2016, for the fiscal year ended May 1, 2016.

The company’s nine months ended January 29, 2017, and January 31, 2016, represent 39 week periods, respectively.

2.  Significant Accounting Policies

As of January 29, 2017, there were no changes in the nature of our significant accounting policies or the application of those policies from those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year then ended May 1, 2016.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, an amendment to FASB ASC Topic 740, which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes on an entity’s classified balance sheet. Currently, entities that are required to issue a classified balance sheet present a net current and net noncurrent deferred income tax asset or liability for each tax jurisdiction. The amendments in this ASU require entities to offset all deferred income tax assets and liabilities for each tax jurisdiction and present a net deferred income tax asset or liability as a single noncurrent amount. The recognition and measurement guidance for deferred income tax assets and liabilities are not affected by this amendment. This amended guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted and the standard may be applied either retrospectively or on a prospective basis to all deferred income tax assets and liabilities. We early adopted this amendment during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 on a retrospective basis.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its authoritative guidance on accounting for certain share-based payment awards. The amended guidance requires that share-based compensation awards with terms of a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award and compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. The guidance will permit an entity to apply the amendments in the update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the consolidated financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. This guidance was effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements as we currently do not have any share-based payment awards with terms of a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the requisite service period.

 

 

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which amends ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are intended to enhance the comparability of revenue recognition practices and will be applied to all contracts with customers. Improved disclosures related to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized are requirements under the amended guidance. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-24, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date which proposed a deferral of the effective date by one year, and on July 7, 2015, the FASB decided to delay the effective date by one year. The deferral results in the new revenue standard being effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. We are therefore required to apply the new revenue guidance in our fiscal 2019 interim and annual financial statements. This ASU can be adopted either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We are currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which changed the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to lower of cost and net realizable value. This ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. We are therefore required to apply this guidance in our fiscal 2018 interim and annual financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which increases transparency and comparability among companies accounting for lease transactions. The most significant change of this update will require the recognition of lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for operating lease arrangements with lease terms greater than twelve months for lessees. This update will require a modified retrospective application which includes a number of optional practical expedients related to the identification and classification of leases commenced before the effective date. This ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. We are therefore required to apply this guidance in our fiscal 2020 interim and annual financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Shares-Based Payment Accounting." ASU 2016-09 is intended to improve the accounting for share-based payment transactions as part of the FASB’s simplification initiative. ASU 2016-09 changes several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including: (1) accounting for income taxes; (2) classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows; (3) forfeitures; (4) minimum statutory tax withholding requirements; and (5) classification of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years for public companies. We are therefore required to apply this guidance in our fiscal 2018 interim and annual financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact that ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, to address the diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented in the statement of cash flows. This new guidance provides clarity around the cash flow classification for eight specific issues in an effort to reduce the current and potential future diversity in practice. This standard, which is to be applied retrospectively, will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. We are therefore required to apply this new guidance in our fiscal 2019 interim and annual financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Than Inventory, to reduce the diversity in practice and complexity associated with accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Current GAAP prohibits recognition of deferred income taxes for an intra-entity transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The new pronouncement stipulates that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This new guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted in the first interim period only. We are therefore required to apply this new guidance in our fiscal 2019 interim and annual financial statements. The amendments are to applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

There are no other new accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

3.  Stock-Based Compensation

Equity Incentive Plan Description

On September 16, 2015, our shareholders approved an equity incentive plan entitled the Culp, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan updated and replaced our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) as the vehicle for granting new equity based awards substantially similar to those authorized under the 2007 Plan. In general, the 2015 Plan authorizes the grant of stock options intended to qualify as incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, and other equity and cash related awards as determined by our Compensation Committee. An aggregate of 1,200,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the 2015 Plan, with certain sub-limits that would apply with respect to specific types of awards that may be issued as defined in the 2015 Plan. In connection with the approval of the 2015 Plan, no further awards will be granted under the 2007 Plan, but outstanding awards under the 2007 Plan will be settled in accordance with their terms.

At January 29, 2017, there were 959,942 shares available for future equity based grants under our 2015 plan.

 

 

 

Incentive Stock Option Awards

We did not grant any incentive stock option awards through the through the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

At January 29, 2017, options to purchase 78,600 shares of common stock were outstanding and exercisable, had a weighted average exercise price of $8.43 per share, and a weighted average contractual term of 0.6 years. At January 29, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value for options outstanding and exercisable was $2.0 million.

The aggregate intrinsic value for options exercised for the nine months ending January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016, was $128,000 and $1.0 million, respectively.

At January 29, 2017, there were no unvested incentive stock option awards. Therefore, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to incentive stock option awards at January 29, 2017.

No compensation expense was recorded for incentive stock options for the nine months ended January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016, respectively.

Common Stock Awards

On October 3, 2016, we granted a total of 4,800 shares of common stock to our outside directors. These shares of common stock vest immediately and were measured at $29.80 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock at the date of grant.

On October 1, 2015, we granted a total of 3,000 shares of common stock to our outside directors. These shares of common stock vest immediately and were measured at $31.77 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock at the date of grant.

We recorded $143,000 and $95,000 within selling, general, and administrative expense for these common stock awards for the nine months ending January 29, 2017, and January 31, 2016, respectively.

Performance Based Restricted Stock Units

Fiscal 2017 Grants

On July 14, 2016, certain key members of management were granted performance-based restricted stock units which could earn up to 107,880 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $28 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over the requisite service period of three years.

On July 14, 2016, a non-employee was granted performance-based restricted stock units which could earn up to 11,549 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreement. The fair value of this award is measured at the earlier date of when the performance criteria are met or the end of the reporting period. At January 29, 2017, this grant was unvested and was measured at $33.80 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock at the end of the reporting period. The vesting of this award is over the requisite service period of three years.

 

 

 

Fiscal 2016 Grants

On July 15, 2015, certain key members of management were granted performance-based restricted stock units which could earn up to 107,554 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $32.23 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over the requisite service period of three years.

On July 15, 2015, a non-employee was granted performance-based restricted stock units which could earn up to 10,364 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreement. The fair value of this award is measured at the earlier date of when the performance criteria are met or the end of the reporting period. At January 29, 2017, this grant was unvested and was measured at $33.80 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock at the end of the reporting period. The vesting of this award is over the requisite service period of three years.

Fiscal 2015 Grants

On June 24, 2014, certain key members of management were granted performance-based restricted stock units which could earn up to 102,845 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $17.70 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over the requisite service period of three years.

On March 3, 2015, a non-employee was granted performance-based restricted stock units which could earn up to 28,000 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. The fair value of this award is measured at the earlier date of when the performance criteria are met or the end of the reporting period. At January 29, 2017, 16,000 restricted stock units associated with this grant were unvested and were measured at $33.80 per share, which represents the closing price of the company’s common stock at the end of the reporting period. The vesting of these 16,000 restricted stock units vest over their requisite service period of 28 months. During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, 12,000 shares of common stock associated with the grant vested and had a weighted average fair value of $345,000 or $28.77 per share.

2014 Grant

On June 25, 2013, certain key members of management were granted performance-based restricted stock units which could earn up to 72,380 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $17.12 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over the requisite service period of three years.

 

 

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, 37,192 shares of common stock associated with this grant vested and had a weighted average fair value of $637,000 or $17.12 per share. Our fiscal 2014 grant is fully vested.

Fiscal 2013 Grant

On July 11, 2012, certain key members of management were granted performance based restricted stock units which could earn up to 120,000 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $10.21 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over the requisite service period of three years.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, 115,855 shares of common stock associated with our fiscal 2013 grant vested and had a weighted average fair value of $1.2 million or $10.21 per share. Our fiscal 2013 grant is fully vested.

Overall

We recorded compensation expense of $2.5 million and $1.9 million within selling, general, and administrative expense for our performance based restricted stock unit awards for the nine month periods ending January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016, respectively. Compensation cost is recorded based on an assessment each reporting period of the probability if certain performance goals will be met during the vesting period. If performance goals are not probable of occurrence, no compensation cost will be recognized and any recognized compensation cost would be reversed.

As of January 29, 2017, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to our performance based restricted stock unit awards was $4.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.9 years.

Time Vested Restricted Stock Units

On July 14, 2016, an employee was granted 1,200 shares of time vested restricted stock units. This award was valued based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of this award was $28 per share, which represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of this award is over the requisite service period of 11 months.

We recorded compensation expense of $20,000 within selling, general, and administrative expense for our time vested restricted stock unit awards for the nine months ending January 29, 2017. There were not any time vested restricted stock unit awards granted or unvested during the nine months ending January 31, 2016 and, therefore, no compensation expense was recorded.

At January 29, 2017, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested time vested restricted stock awards was $14,000, which is expected to be recognized over the next 4.5 months.

 

4.  Accounts Receivable

A summary of accounts receivable follows:

(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016				May 1, 2016
Customers		$	24,339			$	28,684			$	25,531
Allowance for doubtful accounts			(397	)			(814	)			(1,088	)
Reserve for returns and allowances and discounts			(1,216	)			(1,086	)			(962	)
		$	22,726			$	26,784			$	23,481

A summary of the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts follows:

		Nine months ended
(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Beginning balance		$	(1,088	)		$	(851	)
Provision for bad debts			239				(93	)
Net write-offs, net of recoveries			452				130
Ending balance		$	(397	)		$	(814	)

 

A summary of the activity in the allowance for returns and allowances and discounts accounts follows:

		Nine months ended
(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Beginning balance		$	(962	)		$	(738	)
Provision for returns, allowances
and discounts			(2,357	)			(2,389	)
Credits issued			2,103				2,041
Ending balance		$	(1,216	)		$	(1,086	)

5.  Inventories

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is determined using the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method.

A summary of inventories follows:

(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016				May 1, 2016
Raw materials		$	6,977			$	6,831			$	5,462
Work-in-process			3,161				3,365				2,972
Finished goods			36,055				38,289				38,097
		$	46,193			$	48,485			$	46,531

 

6.  Other Assets

A summary of other assets follows:

(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016				May 1, 2016
Cash surrender value – life insurance		$	376			$	357			$	357
Non-compete agreement, net			847				922				903
Customer relationships, net			677				728				715
Other			517				428				598
		$	2,417			$	2,435			$	2,573

 

Non-Compete Agreement

We recorded our non-compete agreement at its fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation model. Our non-compete agreement is amortized on a straight-line basis over the fifteen year life of the respective agreement.

The gross carrying amount of our non-compete agreement was $2.0 million at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016 and May 1, 2016, respectively. At January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, accumulated amortization for our non-compete agreement was $1.2 million, $1.1 million, and $1.1 million, respectively.

Amortization expense for our non-compete agreement was $56,000 for the nine month periods ended January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016. The remaining amortization expense for the next five fiscal years and thereafter follows: FY 2017 - $18,000; FY 2018 - $75,000; FY 2019- $75,000; FY 2020 - $75,000; FY 2021 - $75,000 and Thereafter - $529,000.

The weighted average amortization period for our non-compete agreement is 11.3 years as of January 29, 2017.

Customer Relationships

We recorded our customer relationships at their fair value based on a multi-period excess earnings valuation model. Our customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over its seventeen year useful life.

The gross carrying amount of our customer relationships was $868,000 at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, respectively. Accumulated amortization for our customer relationships was $191,000, $140,000, and $153,000 at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, respectively.

Amortization expense for our customer relationships was $38,000 for the nine months ending January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016. The remaining amortization expense for the next five fiscal years and thereafter follows: FY 2017 - $13,000; FY 2018 - $51,000; FY 2019 - $51,000; FY 2020 - $51,000; FY 2021 - $51,000; and Thereafter - $460,000.

The weighted average amortization period for our customer relationships is 13.3 years as of January 29, 2017.

Cash Surrender Value – Life Insurance

At January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016 we had one life insurance contract with a death benefit of $1.4 million.

 

 

 

Our cash surrender value – life insurance balances totaling $376,000, $357,000 and $357,000 at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, respectively, are collectible upon death of the respective insured.

7.  Accrued Expenses

A summary of accrued expenses follows:

(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016				May 1, 2016
Compensation, commissions and related benefits		$	9,205			$	8,678			$	10,011
Advertising rebates			118				2,876				870
Interest			11				-				-
Other accrued expenses			1,177				1,136				1,041
		$	10,511			$	12,690			$	11,922

8.  Lines of Credit

Revolving Credit Agreement – United States

Our Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) provides a revolving loan commitment of $30 million. Interest was charged at a rate (applicable interest rate of 2.23% at January 29, 2017) as a variable spread over LIBOR based on our ratio of debt to EBITDA. The Credit Agreement contains certain financial and other covenants as defined in the agreement and is set to expire on August 15, 2018.

The purposes of our revolving credit line is to support potential short term cash needs in different jurisdictions within our global operations, mitigate our risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and ultimately repatriate earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. for various strategic purposes.

Outstanding borrowings are secured by a pledge of 65% of the common stock of Culp International Holdings Ltd. (our subsidiary located in the Cayman Islands), as required by the Credit Agreement. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, respectively.

At January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, there were $250,000 in outstanding letters of credit (all of which related to workers compensation) provided by the Credit Agreement.

Effective August 1, 2016, we entered into a Third Amendment to our Credit Agreement that will allow us to issue letters of credit not to exceed $7.5 million. On August 3, 2016, we issued a $5.0 million letter of credit (all of which is currently outstanding and in addition to the $250,000 letter of credit noted above) for the construction of a new building associated with our mattress fabrics segment (see Note 15 for further details). This $5.0 million letter of credit will be automatically reduced in increments of $1.25 million on August 1, 2017, November 1, 2017, February 1, 2018, and May 15, 2018, respectively.

Revolving Credit Agreement – China

We have an unsecured credit agreement associated with our operations in China that provides for a line of credit of up to 40 million Chinese Yuan Renminbi (approximately $5.8 million USD at January 29, 2017), that expires February 15, 2018. This agreement has an interest rate determined by the Chinese government and there were no borrowings outstanding as of January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016.

 

 

 

Overall

Our loan agreements require, among other things, that we maintain compliance with certain financial covenants. At January 29, 2017, the company was in compliance with these financial covenants.

9.  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs). Determining where an asset or liability falls within that hierarchy depends on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole. An adjustment to the pricing method used within either level 1 or level 2 inputs could generate a fair value measurement that effectively falls in a lower level in the hierarchy. The hierarchy consists of three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – Inputs other than level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable, and

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs developed using the company’s estimates and assumptions, which reflect those that market participants would use.

Recurring Basis

The following table presents information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter based on various factors and it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. However, we expect that changes in classifications between different levels will be rare.

Short-Term Investments

At January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, our short-term investments totaled $2.4 million, $4.3 million, and $4.4 million, respectively, and consisted of short-term bond funds. Our short-term bond funds are recorded at their fair value, are classified as available-for-sale, and their unrealized gains or losses are included in other comprehensive income (loss). Our short-term bond investments had an accumulated unrealized loss totaling $68,000, $181,000, and $100,000 at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, respectively. At January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, the fair value of our short-term bond funds approximated its cost basis.

Long- Term Investments - Held-To-Maturity

During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, management decided to invest approximately $31.0 million in investment grade U.S. Corporate bonds with maturities primarily ranging from 2 to 2.5 years. The purpose of this investment was to earn a higher rate of return on our excess cash located in the Cayman Islands. These investments are classified as held-to-maturity as we have the positive intent and ability to hold these investments until maturity. Our held-to-maturity investments will be recorded as either current or noncurrent on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, based on contractual maturity date and stated at amortized cost.

At January 29, 2017, our held-to-maturity investments totaled $30.8 million and consisted of U.S. Corporate bonds. The fair value of our held-to-maturity investments totaled $30.7 million.

Long-Term Investments - Rabbi Trust

Effective January 1, 2014, we established a Rabbi Trust to set aside funds for participants of our deferred compensation plan (the “Plan”) and enable the participants to credit their contributions to various investment options of the Plan. The investments associated with the Rabbi Trust consist of a money market fund and various mutual funds that are classified as available for sale.

Our long-term investments are recorded at their fair value of $5.5 million, $3.6 million, and $4.0 million at January 29, 2017, January 30, 2016, and May 1, 2016, respectively. Our long-term investments had an accumulated unrealized gain of $11,000 at January 29, 2017 and an accumulated unrealized loss of $99,000 and $44,000 at January 31, 2016 and May 1, 2016, respectively. The fair value of our long-term investments associated with our Rabbi Trust approximates its cost basis.

Other

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.

10.  Cash Flow Information

Interest and income taxes paid are as follows:

		Nine months ended
(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Interest		$	110			$	95
Income taxes			4,704				4,921

 

Interest costs charged to operations were $97,000 and $58,000 for the nine months ended January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016, respectively.

 

 

Interest costs of $97,000 and $58,000 for the construction of qualifying fixed assets were capitalized and will be amortized over the related assets’ useful lives for the nine months ended January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016, respectively.

11.  Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income per share uses the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation calculated using the treasury stock method.  Weighted average shares used in the computation of basic and diluted net income per share follows:

		Three months ended
(amounts in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic			12,313				12,331
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation			231				155
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted			12,544				12,486

All options to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of diluted net income for the three months ended January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016, as the exercise price of the options was less than the average market price of the common shares.

 

		Nine months ended
(amounts in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic			12,302				12,317
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation			215				171
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted			12,517				12,488

 

All options to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of diluted net income for the nine months ended January 29, 2017 and January 31, 2016, as the exercise price of the options was less than the average market price of the common shares.

12.  Segment Information

Our operations are classified into two business segments: mattress fabrics and upholstery fabrics.  The mattress fabrics segment manufactures, sources, and sells fabrics and mattress covers to bedding manufacturers.  The upholstery fabrics segment sources, manufactures, and sells fabrics primarily to residential furniture manufacturers.

 

 

 

We evaluate the operating performance of our segments based upon income from operations before certain unallocated corporate expenses and other non-recurring items. Cost of sales in both segments include costs to manufacture or source our products, including costs such as raw material and finished goods purchases, direct and indirect labor, overhead and incoming freight charges.  Unallocated corporate expenses primarily represent compensation and benefits for certain executive officers, all costs related to being a public company, and other miscellaneous expenses.  Segment assets include assets used in the operations of each segment and primarily consist of accounts receivable, inventories, and property, plant and equipment. The mattress fabrics segment also includes in segment assets, investment in an unconsolidated joint venture, goodwill, a non-compete agreement, and customer relationships associated with an acquisition.

Financial information for the company’s operating segments follows:

		Three months ended
(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Net sales:
Mattress Fabrics		$	45,920			$	44,277
Upholstery Fabrics			30,249				34,189
		$	76,169			$	78,466
Gross profit:
Mattress Fabrics		$	9,758			$	8,751
Upholstery Fabrics			7,001				7,812
		$	16,759			$	16,563
Selling, general, and administrative expenses:
Mattress Fabrics		$	3,391			$	2,953
Upholstery Fabrics			3,901				3,963
Total segment selling, general, and
administrative expenses			7,292				6,916
Unallocated corporate expenses			2,532				2,421
		$	9,824			$	9,337
Income from operations:
Mattress Fabrics		$	6,367			$	5,798
Upholstery Fabrics			3,100				3,849
Total segment income from operations			9,467				9,647
Unallocated corporate expenses			(2,532	)			(2,421	)
Total income from operations			6,935				7,226
Interest income			124				38
Other expense			(69	)			(85	)
Income before income taxes		$	6,990			$	7,179

 

 

		Nine months ended
(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Net sales:
Mattress Fabrics		$	141,977			$	137,522
Upholstery Fabrics			90,217				98,085
		$	232,914			$	235,607
Gross profit:
Mattress Fabrics		$	32,414			$	28,133
Upholstery Fabrics			19,665				20,365
		$	52,079			$	48,498
Selling, general, and administrative expenses:
Mattress Fabrics		$	10,185			$	8,865
Upholstery Fabrics			11,086				11,372
Total segment selling, general, and
administrative expenses			21,271				20,237
Unallocated corporate expenses			7,900				7,275
		$	29,171			$	27,512
Income from operations:
Mattress Fabrics		$	22,229			$	19,267
Upholstery Fabrics			8,579				8,994
Total segment income from operations			30,808				28,261
Unallocated corporate expenses			(7,900	)			(7,275	)
Total income from operations			22,908				20,986
Interest income			164				150
Other expense			(376	)			(405	)
Income before income taxes		$	22,696			$	20,731

(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016				May 1, 2016
Segment assets:
Mattress Fabrics
Current assets (1)		$	41,498			$	44,309			$	43,472
Non-compete agreement			847				922				903
Customer relationships			677				728				715
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture			600				-				-
Goodwill			11,462				11,462				11,462
Property, plant and equipment (2)			47,755				35,637				37,480
Total mattress fabrics assets			102,839				93,058				94,032
Upholstery Fabrics
Current assets (1)			27,421				30,960				26,540
Property, plant and equipment (3)			1,826				1,590				1,564
Total upholstery fabrics assets			29,247				32,550				28,104
Total segment assets			132,086				125,608				122,136
Non-segment assets:
Cash and cash equivalents			15,659				31,713				37,787
Short-term investments			2,410				4,259				4,359
Deferred income taxes			422				4,312				2,319
Income taxes receivable			-				23				155
Other current assets			2,514				2,331				2,477
Property, plant and equipment (4)			752				930				929
Long-term investments (Held-to-Maturity)			30,832				-				-
Long-term investments (Rabbi Trust)			5,488				3,590				4,025
Other assets			893				785				955
Total assets		$	191,056			$	173,551			$	175,142

		Nine months ended
(dollars in thousands)		January 29, 2017				January 31, 2016
Capital expenditures (5):
Mattress Fabrics		$	14,957			$	6,215
Upholstery Fabrics			645				481
Unallocated Corporate			72				381
Total capital expenditures		$	15,674			$	7,077
Depreciation expense:
Mattress Fabrics		$	4,673			$	4,273
Upholstery Fabrics			631				615
Total depreciation expense		$	5,304			$	4,888

---

 

 

(1)	Current assets represent accounts receivable and inventory for the respective segment.

(2)

The $47.8 million at January 29, 2017, represents property, plant, and equipment of $32.6 million and $15.2 million located in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. The $35.6 million at January 31, 2016, represents property, plant, and equipment of $23.0 million and $12.6 million located in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. The $37.5 million at May 1, 2016, represents property, plant, and equipment of $24.8 million and $12.7 million located in the U.S. and Canada, respectively.

(3)

The $1.8 million at January 29, 2017, represents property, plant, and equipment of $1.1 million and $711 located in the U.S. and China, respectively. The $1.6 million at January 31, 2016, represents property, plant, and equipment of $860 and $730 located in the U.S. and China, respectively. The $1.6 million at May 1, 2016, represents property, plant, and equipment of $893 and $671 located in the U.S. and China, respectively.

(4)

The $752, $930, and $929 at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016 and May 1, 2016, respectively, represent property, plant, and equipment associated with unallocated corporate departments and corporate departments shared by both the mattress and upholstery fabric segments. Property, plant, and equipment associated with corporate are located in the U.S.

(5)	Capital expenditure amounts are stated on the accrual basis. See Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for capital expenditure amounts on a cash basis.

13.  Income Taxes

Effective Income Tax Rate

We recorded income tax expense of $6.6 million, or 28.9% of income before income taxes, for the nine month period ended January 29, 2017, compared to income tax expense of $7.4 million, or 35.7% of income before income taxes, for the nine month period ended January 31, 2016. Our effective income tax rates for the nine month periods ended January 29, 2017, and January 31, 2016, were based upon the estimated effective income tax rate applicable for the full year after giving effect to any significant items related specifically to interim periods. The effective income tax rate can be affected over the fiscal year by the mix and timing of actual earnings from our U.S. operations and foreign sources versus annual projections and changes in foreign currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar.

The following schedule summarizes the factors that are attributable to the difference between income tax expense at the federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate reflected in the consolidated financial statements:

 

 

Deferred Income Taxes

In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we evaluate our deferred income taxes to determine if a valuation allowance is required. ASC Topic 740 requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more-likely-than-not” standard, with significant weight being given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Since the company operates in multiple jurisdictions, we assess the need for a valuation allowance on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, taking into account the effects of local tax law. Based on our assessment at January 29, 2017, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of $557,000, of which $473,000 pertained to certain U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits and $84,000 pertained to loss carryfowards associated with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland.  Based on our assessment at January 31, 2016, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of $874,000, of which $498,000 pertained to certain U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits and $376,000 pertained to loss carryfowards associated with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland.  Based on our assessment at May 1, 2016, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of $590,000, of which $518,000 pertained to certain U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits and $72,000 pertained to loss carryfowards associated with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland.

No valuation allowance was recorded against our net deferred tax assets associated with our operations located in China and Canada at January 29, 2017, January 31, 2016, and May 1, 2016, respectively.

The recorded valuation allowance of $557,000 at January 29, 2017, has no effect on our operations, loan covenant compliance, or the possible realization of certain U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits and our loss carryforwards associated with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland. If it is determined that it is more-likely-than-not that we will realize any of these deferred tax assets, an income tax benefit will be recognized at that time.

In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we assess whether the undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries will be reinvested indefinitely or eventually distributed to our U.S. parent company. ASC Topic 740 requires that a deferred tax liability should be recorded for undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries that will not be reinvested indefinitely. Based on our assessment as of January 29, 2017, it is our intention not to permanently invest our undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries. Also, we assess the recognition of U.S. foreign income tax credits associated with foreign withholding and income tax payments and whether it is more-likely-than-not that our foreign income tax credits will not be realized. If it is determined that any foreign income tax credits need to be recognized or it is more-likely-than-not our foreign income tax credits will not be realized, an adjustment to our provision for income taxes will be recognized at that time.

At January 29, 2017, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $143.2 million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries totaled $405,000, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes totaling $42.5 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $42.1 million.

 

 

Culp, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

At January 31, 2016, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $100.9 million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries totaled $3.3 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes totaling $37.3 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $34.0 million.

At May 1, 2016, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $129.6 million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries totaled $604,000, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes totaling $38.5 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $37.9 million.

At January 29, 2017, our non-current deferred tax asset of $422,000 pertains to our operations located in China. At January 31, 2016, our non-current deferred tax asset of $4.3 million represents $3.5 million and $773,000 from our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively. At May 1, 2016, our non-current deferred tax asset of $2.3 million represents $1.7 million and $572,000 from our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively.

At January 29, 2017, our non-current deferred tax liability of $2.9 million represents $1.7 million and $1.2 million from our operations located in Canada and the U.S., respectively. Our non-current deferred tax liability balances of $1.2 million and $1.5 million at January 31, 2016 and May 1, 2016, respectively, pertain to our operations located in Canada.

Uncertainty In Income Taxes

At January 29, 2017, we had a $13.4 million total gross unrecognized income tax benefit, of which $11.6 million and $1.8 million were classified as non-current deferred income taxes and income taxes payable – long-term, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At January 31, 2016, we had a $13.2 million total gross unrecognized income tax benefit, of which $9.7 million and $3.5 million were classified as non-current deferred income taxes and income taxes payable – long-term, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At May 1, 2016, we had $14.9 million of total gross unrecognized income tax benefit, of which $11.1 million and $3.8 million were classified as non-current deferred income taxes and income taxes payable – long-term, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

At January 29, 2017, our $13.4 million total gross unrecognized income tax benefit included $1.8 million that, if recognized, would favorably affect the income tax rate in future periods. At January 31, 2016, our $13.2 million total gross unrecognized income tax benefit, included $3.5 million that, if recognized, would favorably affect the income tax rate in future periods. At May 1, 2016, our $14.9 million total gross unrecognized income tax benefit included $3.8 million that, if recognized, would favorably affect the income tax rate in future periods.

Our gross unrecognized income tax benefit of $13.4 million at January 29, 2017, relates to tax positions for which significant change is reasonably possible within the next year. This amount primarily relates to double taxation under applicable income tax treaties with foreign tax jurisdictions. United States federal and state income tax returns filed by us remain subject to examination for income tax years 2005 and subsequent due to loss carryforwards. Canadian federal returns filed by us remain subject to examination for income tax years 2010 and subsequent. Canadian provincial (Quebec) returns filed by us remain subject to examination for income tax years 2009 and subsequent, with the statute of limitations for the 2009 income tax year expiring in April 2017. Income tax returns associated with our operations located in China are subject to examination for income tax year 2011 and subsequent.