Cyber Apps World - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x
Annual
Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange
Act Of 1934
For
the fiscal year ended July
31, 2008
¨
Transition
Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange
Act Of 1934
For
the transition period from _______________ to
_______________
COMMISSION
FILE NUMBER: 000-50693
SUPERLATTICE
POWER, INC.
(Name
of
Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
NEVADA
|
90-0314205
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
420 N. Nellis Blvd., Suite A3-146 | ||
Las
Vegas, Nevada
|
89110
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(702)
425-7376
|
Issuer's
telephone number
|
Securities registered under
|
|
Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
|
NONE
|
Securities registered under
|
|
Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports to Section 13
or
15(d)Of the Act. ¨
Yes
x
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (Check One):
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
(Do
not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨
Yes
x
No
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed second fiscal quarter was $14,350,000.
Number
of
shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 15, 2008:
115,000,000.
Documents
incorporated by reference: None
PART
I
NOTE
REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS
OF
THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This
Annual Report contains historical information as well as forward-looking
statements. Statements looking forward in time are included in this Annual
Report pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks
and uncertainties that may cause our actual results in future periods to be
materially different from any future performance suggested herein. We wish
to
caution readers that in addition to the important factors described elsewhere
in
this Form 10-KSB, the following forward looking statements, among others,
sometimes have affected, and in the future could affect, our actual results
and
could cause our actual consolidated results during 2006, and beyond, to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or
on
our behalf.
Item
1. Business.
Background
We
were
incorporated on July 15, 2002 under the laws of the State of Nevada under the
name Titan Web Solutions, Inc. On August 18, 2003, we changed our name to
Javakingcoffee, Inc., and on July 15, 2005 changed our name to Zingo, Inc.
We
had been engaged in the business of offering a full range of business consulting
services to retailers in the specialty coffee industry in China until August
2005.
On
August
18, 2005, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, pursuant
to
which we agreed to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Whistlertel, Inc.
(“Whistlertel”), a Nevada corporation, which was formerly a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Hybrid Technologies, Inc. On August 19, 2005, we completed the
acquisition of Whistlertel (which was subsequently renamed as Zingo Telecom,
Inc.) in exchange for the issuance of 80,000,000 shares of our common stock,
or
69.56% of our outstanding common stock following such issuance. We entered
into
a license agreement with Hybrid Technologies, Inc. on April 15, 2008, for the
license of the development of their lithium battery technology, and we sold
our
Zingo Telecom, Inc. and M/S Zingo Bpo Services Pvt. Ltd. subsidiaries that
offered telecommunications services to business and residential customers
utilizing VoIP technology on May 15, 2008.
To
reflect our new business, we changed our name from Zingo, Inc. to Superlattice
Power, Inc. on April 25, 2008.
On
August
17, 2007, our Board of Directors approved the change in our fiscal year from
the
calendar year to a fiscal year ending on July 31.
Our
principal executive office is located at 420 N Nellis Blvd Suite A3-146 Las
Vegas, Nevada 89110. The telephone number of our principal executive office
is
(702) 425-7376.
2
Recent
Developments
License
Agreement With Hybrid Technologies
Effective
April 15, 2008, we entered into a License Agreement (the “License Agreement”)
with Hybrid providing for Hybrid’s license to us of Hybrid’s patent applications
and technologies for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries for hybrid vehicles
and
other applications, with priority purchase rights and pricing for Hybrid. We
have agreed to invest a minimum of $1,500,000 in each of the next two years
in
development of this technology. We also leased space in Hybrid’s North Carolina
facility where we will conduct our developmental and manufacturing operations
for lithium ion batteries.
Sale
of Zingo Telecom
On
May
15, 2008, we sold to Heritage Asset Management Inc. for $215,000 the 75,000
outstanding shares of common stock, constituting 100% of the outstanding stock,
of our subsidiary Zingo Telecom, Inc. In addition, at the closing, we assigned
and transferred to Heritage all receivables or debt obligations of Zingo Telecom
owing to or held by us at the closing date, and we assigned and transferred
to
Heritage all outstanding shares of M/S Zingo Bpo Services Pvt. Ltd. Under
certain circumstances, the Company could possibly be exposed to potential
liability for fines and penalties under the rules and regulations of the Federal
Communications Commission for regulatory compliance issues involving the
Company's former subsidiary Zingo Telecom, Inc., which was sold on May 15,
2008.
The Company would vigorously contest any assertion against it of liabilities
deriving from regulatory compliance issues involving this former
subsidiary.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As
of
July 31, 2008, we had cash on hand of $15,695. During the year ended July 31,
2008, we have incurred a net comprehensive loss of $865,290. On July
31, 2008, we had a working capital deficiency of $4,607,333 and a stockholders'
deficit of $4,573,730.
We
had
115,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of October 15,
2008. Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board.
General
We
are
developing safe rechargeable battery system for varied applications ranging
from
portable electronics to onboard energy storage in EVs. Lithium ion batteries
are
rechargeable and composed of cathode, anode, separator and
electrolytes.
In 1990,
Sony (Japan)
introduced the lithium ion battery. Sony used an expensive cathode material,
which was also unsafe.
We are
taking steps to pioneer a superlattice cathode material for the use in lithium
ion rechargeable batteries.
Lithium
ion batteries that we plan to develop are rechargeable batteries composed of
cells linked together, each cell created from lithiated cathode powder coated
on
aluminum foil (electrode material that the electron flows out from during
charge) and anode powder coated on copper foil (electrode material that the
electro flows into during charge) with a separator (polymer material in between
anode and cathode) in a mixture of electrolytes, which is an ionically
conductive medium.
Our
goal
is continually to improve our proprietary semi-solid synthesis process for
the
development of lithium ion rechargeable battery technologies to meet the growing
needs for a less expensive, high-energy density, extended life and fast
recharging battery while considering safety as a major concern.
3
We
use a
proprietary superlattice cathode material and its technically advanced synthesis
process. Our other technical expertise includes Battery Management Systems
(BMS)
and a high current rate battery charger. A typical battery pack will consist
of
a number of lithium ion cells and a BMS.
Currently,
our technology development is in the initial phase of prototyping and testing.
Once a prototype is successfully obtained, we plan to work closely with
production specialists in the battery industry and material synthesis to lead
the battery manufacturing unit along with marketing and sales team. Our primary
focus will then simultaneously operate research and development, production
and
marketing of the new products.
License
Agreement with Hybrid Technologies
Effective
April 15, 2008, we entered into the License Agreement with Hybrid, providing
for
Hybrid’s license to us of Hybrid’s patent applications and technologies for
rechargeable lithium-ion batteries for hybrid vehicles and other applications
(“Licensed Products”).
Under
the
License Agreement, Hybrid has the right to purchase its requirements of lithium
ion batteries from us, and its requirements of lithium ion batteries shall
be
supplied in preference to, and on a priority basis as compared with, supply
and
delivery arrangements in effect for our other customers. Hybrid’s cost for
lithium ion batteries purchased from us is our actual manufacturing costs for
such batteries for our fiscal quarter in which Hybrid’s purchase takes place.
We
have
agreed to invest a minimum of $1,500,000 in each of the next two years in
development of the technology for the Licensed Products.
Effective
April 16, 2008, Hybrid also sold us for the purchase price of $29,005, specified
equipment and supplies related to the Licensed Products.
Competition
Our
lithium battery development operations face substantial competition from other
companies which have significantly greater financial resources than we do.
At
this time the lithium ion battery market is controlled by Asian manufacturers,
and the Company is not aware of any volume battery manufacturer in the United
States. LIB manufacturing moved out from USA in earlier days sighting the
complicated and costly manufacturing process.
Government
Regulation
According
to lithium battery federal regulations, no lithium ion batteries may be shipped
without having passed a series of tests defined by the UN Committee of Experts
on the Transport of Dangerous Goods. Additional cost associated with these
tests
and special packaging requirements along with the troubles posed by delays
in
obtaining the lithium ion batteries on time have caused difficulties for
American companies dealing with the Asian battery suppliers.
4
Employees
As
of the
date of this report, we have three employees. We employ several
consultants.
Research
and Development Expenditures
We
incurred no research and development expenditures in our fiscal years ended
July
31, 2007 and $19,413 of research and development expenditures in the year ended
July 31, 2008.
Patents
and Trademarks
We
have
licensed provisional patent applications involving rechargeable battery cathode
material and battery management systems from Hybrid Technologies and have
acquired a U.S. patent for technology involving varied current and voltage
rating battery packs. These patent rights enable us to customize and
commercialize the battery packs inside electric vehicles according to the
customer’s power requirements. This technology also gives us the ability to
select a parallel or series combination of cells to produce a battery
pack.
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
You
should be particularly aware of the inherent risks associated with our business
plan. These risks include but are not limited to:
General
WE
DO NOT
HAVE SUFFICIENT REVENUES TO SUSTAIN OUR OPERATIONS
We
have
not had sufficient revenues from our telecommunication operations to operate
without substantial loans from our former major stockholder, Hybrid
Technologies, Inc. As of July 31, 2008, we had cash on hand of $15,695. During
our fiscal year ended July 31, 2008, we incurred a
net comprehensive loss of $865,290. On July 31, 2008, we had a working
capital deficiency of $4,607,333 and a stockholders' deficit of $4,573,730.
We
expect that we will continue to incur operating losses in the future in
connection with the development of our lithium battery technology. Failure
to
achieve or maintain profitability may materially and adversely affect the future
value of our common stock.
IF
WE DO
NOT OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING, OUR BUSINESS WILL FAIL
Our
current operating funds are less than necessary for commercialization of our
products, and therefore we will need to obtain additional financing in order
to
complete our business plan. We do not currently have any arrangements for
financing and we may not be able to find such financing if required. Market
factors may make the timing, amount, terms or conditions of additional financing
unavailable to us.
5
WE
HAVE
BEEN THE SUBJECT OF A GOING CONCERN OPINION FROM OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS,
WHICH
MEANS THAT WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE OBTAIN ADDITIONAL
FUNDING
Our
independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit
opinions, issued in connection with our financial statements, which states
that
our ability to continue as a going concern is uncertain.
OUR
MANAGEMENT HAS LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF LITHIUM
ION
BATTERIES AND WITH NEGOTIATING COMMERCIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH
PRODUCTS
Our
management has limited experience in development, production, commercialization
of and negotiating licenses and joint ventures to commercialize the lithium
ion
batteries we are developing. As a result of this inexperience, there is a high
risk we may be unable to complete our business plan and successfully
commercialize our lithium ion battery products, if we succeed in developing
such
products. Because of the intense competition for our planned products, there
is
substantial risk that we will not successfully commercialize these
products.
OUR
PLANNED LITHIUM ION BATTERY BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL
RISKS
The
lithium ion battery market is competitive and risky. We are competing against
numerous competitors with greater financial resources than us, and due to the
difficulties of entry into these markets, we may be unsuccessful and not be
able
to complete our business plan.
LITHIUM
ION BATTERIES, IF NOT PROPERLY MANAGED, MAY POSE A FIRE HAZARD.
We
will
have to develop batteries and battery management systems that eliminate the
risk
of fire from use of lithium ion batteries as a power source. If we are not
able
to develop such systems our business will not develop as planned. If our battery
management systems fail, we could be liable to those who are harmed as a result
of such failure.
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not
applicable.
Item
2. Properties.
Our
mailing address is 420 N. Nellis Blvd., Suite A3-146, Las Vegas, Nevada 89110,
for which we pay $11.00 per month, on a month to month basis.
Effective
April 16, 2008, we agreed to lease approximately 5,000 square feet of space
(“Leased Space”) in Hybrid’s North Carolina facility, such Leased Space to be
suitable for, and utilized by us for, our developmental and manufacturing
operations for Licensed Products pursuant to the License Agreement. The Leased
Space is leased by Hybrid to us on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rental
of
$2,500, the monthly rental to be escalated five (5%) percent annually.
6
Item
3. Legal Proceedings.
On
June
3, 2008, we were notified of a case filed on June 2, 2008, by Peter Strojnik,
Attorney at Law, in the Federal Court for the District of Arizona (Peter
Strojnik, P.C. v. The Energy Bull et al., 2:08-cv-1017
ROS). On
June 24, 2008, the plaintiff amended the complaint to include the Company as
a
defendant. The complaint seeks damages against The Energy Bull and other
defendants based on transmission of unsolicited facsimiles illegally promoting
the stock of the Company to the plaintiff and members of the class that the
plaintiff purports to represent. The lawsuit seeks damages estimated in the
complaint to be between $333 million and $3 billion, as well as injunctive
relief for the alleged sending of unsolicited faxes. We
have
filed a motion to dismiss to exclude the Company from the lawsuit. The
Company disclaims all responsibility for authorizing in any manner unsolicited
facsimiles issued by The Raging Bull or other parties that seek to promote
the
Company’s stock.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not
applicable.
7
PART
II
Item
5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities.
As
of
October 15, 2008, there were approximately 34 record owners of the Company's
Common Stock. The Company's Common Stock started quoting for trade on July
1,
2004 on the National Association of Securities Dealers OTC Bulletin Board under
the symbol "JVKG". Bid quotations for the common stock commenced September
1,
2005.
Period
|
High
|
Low
|
|||||
January
1 to March 31, 2006
|
$
|
8.86
|
$
|
5.25
|
|||
April
1 to June 30, 2006
|
$
|
3.65
|
$
|
8.10
|
|||
July
1 to September 30, 2006
|
$
|
3.00
|
$
|
5.75
|
|||
October
1 to December 31, 2006
|
$
|
4.30
|
$
|
1.15
|
|||
January
1 to March 31, 2007
|
$
|
1.41
|
$
|
.57
|
|||
April
1 to June 30, 2007
|
$
|
.92
|
$
|
.52
|
|||
July
1 to July 31, 2007
|
$
|
.90
|
$
|
.52
|
|||
August
1 to October 31, 2007
|
$
|
2.50
|
$
|
.63
|
|||
November
1, 2007 to January 31, 2008
|
$
|
.60
|
$
|
.30
|
|||
February
1 to April 30, 2008
|
$
|
.47
|
$
|
.37
|
|||
May
1 to July 31, 2008
|
$
|
2.53
|
$
|
.34
|
|||
August
1 to October 14, 2008
|
$
|
2.08
|
$
|
.81
|
Holders
of common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by
the
Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor and, in the event
of
liquidation, to share pro rata in any distribution of the Company's assets
after
payment of liabilities. The Board of Directors is not obligated to declare
a
dividend. The Company has not paid any dividends and the Company does not have
any current plans to pay any dividends.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table sets forth as of July 31, 2008 information with respect to
our
common stock issued and available to be issued under outstanding options,
warrants and rights.
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||||||
Number of securities
|
||||||||||
remaining available for
|
||||||||||
future issuance under
|
||||||||||
equity compensation
|
||||||||||
Number of securities to be
|
Weighted-average exercise
|
plans
|
||||||||
issued upon exercise of
|
price of outstanding
|
(excluding securities
|
||||||||
outstanding options,
|
options, warrants and
|
reflected in
|
||||||||
Plan category
|
warrants and rights
|
rights
|
column (a))
|
|||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
-0-
|
—
|
-0-
|
|||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
-0-
|
—
|
-0-
|
|||||||
Total
|
-0-
|
—
|
-0-
|
8
Item
6. Selected Financial Data.
Not
applicable.
Item
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operations.
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. We use words such as anticipate, believe, plan, expect, future,
intend and similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements.
You
should not place too much reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our
actual results are likely to differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks faced by us
described in this section.
INTRODUCTION
We
were
incorporated on July 15, 2002 under the laws of the State of Nevada under the
name Titan Web Solutions, Inc. On August 18, 2003, we changed our name to
Javakingcoffee, Inc., and on July 15, 2005 changed our name to Zingo, Inc.
We
had been engaged in the business of offering a full range of business consulting
services to retailers in the specialty coffee industry in China until August
2005.
On
August
18, 2005, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, pursuant
to
which we agreed to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Whistlertel, Inc.
(“Whistlertel”), a Nevada corporation, which was formerly a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Hybrid Technologies, Inc. On August 19, 2005, we completed the
acquisition of Whistlertel (which was subsequently renamed as Zingo Telecom,
Inc.) in exchange for the issuance of 80,000,000 shares of our common stock,
or
69.56% of our outstanding common stock following such issuance. We entered
into
a license agreement with Hybrid Technologies, Inc. on April 15, 2008, for the
license of the development of their lithium battery technology, and we sold
our
Zingo Telecom, Inc. and M/S Zingo Bpo Services Pvt. Ltd. subsidiaries that
offered telecommunications services to business and residential customers
utilizing VoIP technology on May 15, 2008. To reflect our new business, we
changed our name from Zingo, Inc. to Superlattice Power, Inc. on April 25,
2008.
Results
Of Operations for the Year Ended July 31, 2008
We
incurred a net loss of $865,290 in the year ended July 31, 2008, which included
general and administrative costs of $1,072,625.
2008
COMPARED WITH 2007
Our
net
comprehensive loss for the twelve months ended July 31, 2008 increased to
$865,290 from $760,739 for the seven month ended July 31, 2007. Our net comprehensive loss
in 2008 included a net loss on discontinued operations of
$356,843.
9
PLAN
OF
OPERATION
Commercial
Initiatives
We
are
developing rechargeable lithium ion batteries for power production for a variety
of uses. We
plan
to pioneer a superlattice cathode material for the use in lithium ion
rechargeable batteries.
5.2
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since
our
incorporation, we have financed our operations almost exclusively through the
sale of our common shares to investors. We expect to finance operations through
the sale of equity in the foreseeable future as we do not receive any revenue
from our new lithium battery development business operations. There is no
guarantee that we will be successful in arranging financing on acceptable
terms.
As
of
July 31, 2008, we had cash on hand of $15,695. Our liabilities at July 31,
2008,
totaled $4,623,028. At July 31, 2008, we had a working capital deficiency of
$4,607,333 and a stockholders' deficit of $4,573,730.
In
the
twelve months ended July 31, 2008, we had received approximately $764,365 in
net
advances from related parties. Without such funding, we could not stay in
business.
Our
ability to raise additional capital is affected by trends and uncertainties
beyond our control. We do not currently have any arrangements for financing
and
we may not be able to find such financing if required. Obtaining additional
financing would be subject to a number of factors, including investor sentiment.
Market factors may make the timing, amount, terms or conditions of additional
financing unavailable to us.
Our
auditors are of the opinion that our continuation as a going concern is in
doubt. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon continued financial
support from our shareholders and other related parties.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Recently
issued pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business
Combinations.” This standard establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the
acquired and the goodwill acquired. This statement also establishes disclosure
requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for
us for acquisitions made after November 30, 2009. We are evaluating the
impact of this standard and do not expect the adoption of SFAS 141(R) to
have a material impact on its financial statements.
In
June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109" (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty
in
tax positions. This Interpretation requires that we recognize in our financial
statements the benefit of a tax position if that position is more likely than
not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position.
The provisions of FIN 48 become effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal
year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded
as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. We adopted FIN 48 as of January
1, 2007 and do not feel that FIN 48 will have an impact on our financial
statements.
10
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements"
(FAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair
value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions
of
FAS 157 become effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. We do
not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on it consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" (FAS 158). FAS 158 requires that
employers recognize the funded status of their defined benefit pension and
other
postretirement plans on the balance sheet and recognize as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax, the plan-related gains or losses and prior
service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized
as
components of net periodic benefit cost. We do not feel the implementation
of
this will have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation
and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning
of
our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will
have on our financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No.
160”). SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling (minority)
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the
Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS No. 160 also requires consolidated
net
income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both
the parent and the noncontrolling interest on the face of the consolidated
statement of income. Under SFAS No. 160, the accounting for changes in a
parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in
deconsolidation must be accounted for as equity transactions for the difference
between the parent’s carrying value and the cash exchanged in the transaction.
In addition, SFAS No. 160 also requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss
in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated (except in the case of a
spin-off), and requires expanded disclosure in the Consolidated Financial
Statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent’s ownership interest and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a
subsidiary. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company
will adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009, as required, and is currently
evaluating the impact of such adoption on its financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities”, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No.
161”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures
to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. It is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 161 will have a material
impact on its financial statements.
11
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
Commodity
Price Risk - The raw materials for manufacturing our batteries could be
affected by changes in the commodities markets, and if we commence manufacturing
our lithium ion batteries, we could be subject to this risk.
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
SUPERLATTICE
POWER, INC.
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
July
31,
2008
12
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
Index
to
Financial Statements
Reports
of Independent Registered Accounting Firms
|
14
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2008
|
16
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for year ended July 31, 2008 and the twelve
months ended July 31, 2007
|
17
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of stockholders’ (deficit) for the year ended July 31,
2008
|
18
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2008 and the
seven
months ended July 31, 2007
|
19
|
|
Notes
to the financial statements
|
20
|
13
REPORT
OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the
Board of Directors of Superlattice Power Inc.
420
N.
Nellis Blvd.
Suite
A-3
- 146
Las
Vegas, NV 89110
We
have
audited the consolidated balance sheet of Superlattice Power Inc. and
Subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, formerly Zingo, Inc.) as of July 31,
2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
deficiency, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The
financial statements of Superlattice Power Inc. (formerly Zingo, Inc.) as of
July 31, 2007, were audited by other auditors whose report, dated November
7,
2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in
the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements of Superlattice Power Inc. and
Subsidiaries referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Superlattice Power Inc. and Subsidiaries as of July 31,
2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then
ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
the
company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the consolidated financial
statements, the Company incurred a net loss of $865,290 for the year ending
July
31, 2008. As of July 31, 2008, current liabilities exceeded current assets
by
$4,607,333. These factors, and others discussed in Note 1, raise substantial
doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
These
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to
the
recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company
cannot continue in existence.
Wiener,
Goodman & Company P.C.
October
20, 2008
14
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Zingo,
Inc.
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Zingo, Inc. as of
July
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the seven month period
ended July 31, 2007 and the twelve month period ended December 31, 2006.
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on
our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all
material respects, the financial position of Zingo, Inc. as of July 31, 2007
and
December 31, 2006 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods
then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the
Company incurred a net loss of $752,879 and $2,002,539 as of July 31, 2007
and
December 31, 2006, respectively. As of July 31, 2007, current liabilities
exceeded current assets by $3,847,177 and total liabilities exceeded total
assets by $3,716,300. As of December 31, 2006 current liabilities exceeded
current assets by $3,086,124 and total liabilities exceeded total assets
by
$2,960,799. These factors, and others discussed in Note 2, raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability
and
classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of
liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue
in
existence.
/s/
Haynie & Company
Littleton,
CO
November
7, 2007
15
SUPERLATTICE
POWER, INC.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
July 31,
|
|||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
15,695
|
$
|
5,962
|
|||
Marketable
securities - restricted
|
-
|
41,224
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 and
$139,000
|
-
|
1,994
|
|||||
Inventories
|
-
|
27,788
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
-
|
48,300
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
15,695
|
125,268
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
33,603
|
89,653
|
|||||
$
|
49,298
|
$
|
214,921
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
|
|
||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
164,260
|
$
|
233,828
|
|||
Deferred
revenues
|
-
|
2,990
|
|||||
Due
to related parties
|
4,458,768
|
3,694,403
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
4,623,028
|
3,931,221
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
deficiency:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 0 issued and
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 115,000,000
issued
and outstanding
|
115,000
|
115,000
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
(84,107
|
)
|
(84,107
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(4,604,623
|
)
|
(3,739,333
|
)
|
|||
Cumulative
other comprehensive loss
|
-
|
(7,860
|
)
|
||||
Total
stockholders' deficiency
|
(4,573,730
|
)
|
(3,716,300
|
)
|
|||
$
|
49,298
|
$
|
214,921
|
See
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
16
SUPERLATTICE
POWER, INC.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
YEAR
|
|
SEVEN
MONTHS
|
|
|||
|
|
ENDED
|
|
ENDED
|
|
||
|
|
July
31, 2008
|
|
July
31, 2007
|
|||
Sales
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Costs
and expenses:
|
|||||||
Cost
of sales
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
341,835
|
87,240
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
19,413
|
-
|
|||||
361,248
|
87,240
|
||||||
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(361,248
|
)
|
(87,240
|
)
|
|||
Other
(expense)
|
(16,852
|
)
|
(83
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
633
|
642
|
|||||
Interest
expense
|
(127,077
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Loss
on sale of asset
|
(3,903
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
loss from continuing operations
|
(508,447
|
)
|
(86,681
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Net
loss from continuing operations
|
(508,447
|
)
|
(86,681
|
)
|
|||
Discontinued
operations:
|
|||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
(526,132
|
)
|
(666,198
|
)
|
|||
Gain
on disposal of discontinued operations
|
169,289
|
-
|
|||||
Net
loss on discontinued operations
|
(356,843
|
)
|
(666,198
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss
|
(865,290
|
)
|
(752,879
|
)
|
|||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
-
|
(7,860
|
)
|
||||
Net
comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(865,290
|
)
|
$
|
(760,739
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted - continuing operations
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
Weighted
shares outstanding - basic and diluted - continuing
operations
|
115,000,000
|
115,000,000
|
|||||
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted - discontinued
operations
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
Weighted
shares outstanding - basic and diluted - discontinued
operations
|
115,000,000
|
115,000,000
|
17
SUPERLATTICE
POWER, INC.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
|
Cumulative
|
||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid
In
|
Comprehensive
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Par
value
|
Capital
|
Income
(Loss)
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Balance
December 31, 2006
|
115,000,000
|
$
|
115,000
|
$
|
(89,205
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(2,986,454
|
)
|
$
|
(2,960,659
|
)
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
-
|
-
|
5,098
|
-
|
-
|
5,098
|
|||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(7,860
|
)
|
-
|
(7,860
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss for period ended July 2007
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(752,879
|
)
|
(752,879
|
)
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Balance
July 31, 2007
|
115,000,000
|
115,000
|
(84,107
|
)
|
(7,860
|
)
|
(3,739,333
|
)
|
(3,716,300
|
)
|
|||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7,860
|
-
|
7,860
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss for year ended July 2008
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(865,290
|
)
|
(865,290
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance
July 31, 2008
|
115,000,000
|
$
|
115,000
|
$
|
(84,107
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(4,604,623
|
)
|
$
|
(4,573,730
|
)
|
See
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
18
SUPERLATTICE
POWER, INC.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR
|
TWELVE MONTHS
|
||||||
|
ENDED
|
ENDED
|
|||||
For the periods
|
July 31, 2008
|
July 31, 2007
|
|||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
|
|||||||
Net
(loss)
|
$
|
(865,290
|
)
|
$
|
(752,879
|
)
|
|
Items
not affecting cash flows
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
34,363
|
23,570
|
|||||
Bad
debt expense
|
35,380
|
133,481
|
|||||
(Decrease)
in accounts receivable
|
(33,386
|
)
|
(120,700
|
)
|
|||
(Increase)
decrease in inventories
|
27,788
|
(14,313
|
)
|
||||
Decrease
in prepaid expenses
|
48,300
|
4,860
|
|||||
Decrease
in marketable securities-restricted
|
41,224
|
-
|
|||||
Loss
on sale of property and equipment
|
3,903
|
-
|
|||||
(Decrease)
in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(69,568
|
)
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|||
(Decrease)
in deferred revenue
|
(2,990
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
cash used for operating activities
|
(780,276
|
)
|
(730,181
|
)
|
|||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
|||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(52,063
|
)
|
(28,479
|
)
|
|||
Sale
of property and equipment
|
68,777
|
-
|
|||||
(Decrease)
in other assets
|
-
|
(643
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
1,070
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) investing
activities
|
17,784
|
(29,122
|
)
|
||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from majority shareholder
|
-
|
5,098
|
|||||
Advances
from related parties
|
1,402,038
|
1,321,278
|
|||||
Payments
to related parties
|
(637,673
|
)
|
(561,923
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
764,365
|
764,453
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
7,860
|
(7,720
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
9,733
|
(2,570
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
5,962
|
8,532
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
15,695
|
$
|
5,962
|
|||
Supplemental
information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Non-cash
transactions
|
|||||||
Transfer
of loan to Blue Diamond Investments, Inc.
|
$
|
4,341,358
|
$
|
-
|
See
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
19
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
1. Financial statement presentation
Superlattice
Power, Inc. (the “Company” or “Superlattice Power”) (formerly Zingo, Inc.),
following the sale as of May 15, 2008, of its VoIP telecommunications business,
intends to concentrate its efforts on further development of the lithium
batteries technology licensed from Hybrid Technologies, Inc., the Company’s
former parent.
The
summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in the
understanding of the financial statements. The financial statements and notes
are the representations of management. These accounting policies conform to
accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America and
have
been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial
statements.
History
and Nature of Business
Superlattice
Power was originally incorporated under the name Titan Web Solutions, Inc.
on
July 15, 2002 under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company changed its
name to JavaKingCoffee, Inc. in August 2003.
Effective
August 8, 2005, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire all of the
outstanding shares of WhistlerTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which was a
wholly owned subsidiary of Hybrid Technologies, Inc. (“Hybrid”). The transaction
was completed on August 19, 2005 by the issuance of 80,000,000 shares of the
Company's stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of WhistlerTel's
common stock.
WhistlerTel,
Inc. was organized in November, 2004. The Company offers telecommunication
services to businesses which provide voice communication via the Internet.
The
system requires high speed broadband internet access.
On
April
15, 2008, Hybrid Technologies, Inc. sold its controlling interest of the
Company’s outstanding common stock to Blue Diamond Investments, Inc. With the
sale of our VoIP telecommunications business, named Zingo Telecom, Inc., on
May
15, 2008 we intend to concentrate efforts on further development of the lithium
batteries technology licensed from Hybrid, the Company’s former parent.
Effective
April 15, 2008, the Company entered into a license agreement with Hybrid
providing for Hybrid’s license to the Company of their patent applications and
technologies for rechargeable lithium ion batteries for hybrid vehicles and
other applications (“licensed products”). Under the license agreement, Hybrid
has the right to purchase their requirements of lithium ion batteries from
the
Company, and their requirements of lithium ion batteries shall be supplied
by
the Company in preference to, and on a priority basis as compared with, supply
and delivery arrangements in effect for other customers of the Company. Hybrid’s
cost for lithium ion batteries shall be the Company’s actual manufacturing costs
for such batteries for the fiscal quarter of the Company in which Hybrid’s
purchase takes place.
The
Company has agreed to invest a minimum of $1,500,000 in each of the next two
years from the date of the license agreement to develop the technology for
the
licensed products. To date, investments have been made in the amount of $24,500.
If the Company does not make the required investments, it will be in default
under the license agreement, Hybrid would have the right to terminate the
license agreement.
Effective
April 16, 2008, the Company agreed to lease approximately 5,000 square feet
of
space in Hybrid’s North Carolina facility. The leased space will be suitable,
and utilized by the Company, for developmental and manufacturing operations
for
licensed products pursuant to the license agreement. The leased space is leased
on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rental of $2,500, the monthly rental
to
be escalated five (5%) percent annually. Also effective April 16, 2008, the
Company purchased certain equipment and supplies related to the license
agreement from Hybrid for the purchase price of $29,005.
20
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
Company merged into its wholly-owned subsidiary, Superlattice Power, Inc.,
on
April 25, 2008. The subsidiary was created solely for this merger, the purpose
of which was to change the name of the Company from Zingo, Inc. to Superlattice
Power, Inc. The state of Nevada does not require stockholder approval of a
merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary into the parent, and in connection with
such
a merger the name of the parent is permitted to be changed. As a result of
the
merger, the assets and liabilities of the surviving corporation were unchanged.
The subsidiary Superlattice Power, Inc. had no assets or liabilities prior
to
the merger.
On
June
4, 2008, Holly Roseberry resigned as President of Superlattice Power, Inc.,
where she remains as a director. Ayaz Kassam is the new President and Chief
Executive Office (“Kassam”), and has been appointed as a director to fill a
vacancy on the Board.
Basis
of presentation
The
Company’s financial statements for the year ended July 31, 2008 have been
prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets
and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.
The Company had $645,632 revenue in 2008 and as of July 31, 2008, there was
a
working capital deficit of approximately $4.6 million. Management recognized
that the Company’s continued existence is dependent upon its ability to obtain
needed working capital through additional equity and/or debt financing and
revenue to cover expenses as the Company continues to incur losses.
The
Company’s business is subject to most of the risks inherent in the establishment
of a new business enterprise. The likelihood of success of the Company must
be
considered in light of the expenses, difficulties, delays and unanticipated
challenges encountered in connection with the formation of a new business,
raising operating and development capital, and the marketing of a new product.
There is no assurance the Company will ultimately achieve a profitable level
of
operations.
The
Company presently does not have sufficient liquid assets to finance its
anticipated funding needs and obligations. The Company’s continued existence is
dependent upon its ability to obtain needed working capital through additional
equity and/or debt financing and achieve a level of sales adequate to support
its cost structure. Management is actively seeking additional capital to ensure
the continuation of its current activities and complete its proposed activities.
However, there is no assurance that additional capital will be obtained. These
uncertainties raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to
continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern.
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of consolidation
The
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Zingo Telecom, Inc. and Zingo Telecom Canada, Inc. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements prepared in accordance with the accounting
standards generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
21
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Cash
and cash equivalents
Cash
and
cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments, which are readily
convertible into cash with original maturities of three months or
less.
Financial
instruments
The
fair
value of accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and
advances from related parties approximates fair value based on their short
maturities.
Accounts
receivable
The
Company provides credit to customers in the normal course of business. An
allowance for accounts receivable is estimated by management based in part
on
the aging of receivables and historical transactions. Periodically management
reviews accounts receivable for accounts that appear to be uncollectible and
writes off these uncollectible balances against the allowance accordingly.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is based on the specific
identification method.
Property
and equipment
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment
are
accounted for by accelerated methods over the following estimated useful
lives
Lives
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
10
years
|
Software
|
3-5
years
|
Computers
|
5
years
|
Long-lived
assets
The
Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 144 (SFAS 144) "Accounting for Long-Lived Assets".
The
carrying value of long-lived assets is reviewed on a regular basis for the
existence of facts and circumstances that may suggest impairment. The Company
recognizes impairment when the sum of undiscounted future cash flows is less
than the carrying amount of the asset. The write down of the asset is charged
to
the period in which the impairment occurs.
Income
taxes
Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit
carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and credits are measured using enacted
tax
rates expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the consolidated financial
statements in the period that includes the enactment date.
Foreign
currency translation
The
functional currency for some foreign operations is the local currency. Assets
and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at balance sheet date
rates
of exchange and income, expense and cash flow items are translated at the
average exchange rate for the period. Translation adjustments in future periods
will be recorded in Cumulative Other Comprehensive Income. The translation
gains
or losses were not material for the years ended July 31, 2008 and
2007.
22
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Comprehensive
income (loss)
The
Company reports comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with the requirements
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.130. For the year ended July
31, 2008 and seven months ended July 31, 2007 the difference between net income
(loss) and comprehensive income (loss) is foreign currency translation.
Discontinued
Operations
In
May
2008, the Company completed the sale of its VoIP business. The results for
the
business were accounted for as discontinued operations in the consolidated
financial statements for the years presented herein. The divestiture resulted
in
a loss of $356,842 and $666,198, respectively, for the year ended July 31,
2008,
and seven months ended July 31, 2007.
Summarized
combined statement of loss for discontinued operations is as
follows:
YEAR
|
|
SEVEN
MONTHS
|
|
||||
|
|
ENDED
|
|
ENDED
|
|
||
|
|
July
31, 2008
|
|
July
31, 2007
|
|||
Net
sales
|
$
|
645,632
|
$
|
783,572
|
|||
Loss
before income tax
|
(1,171,764
|
)
|
(1,449,770
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Loss
from operations - net tax
|
(526,132
|
)
|
(666,198
|
)
|
|||
Gain
on sale of discontinued operations
|
169,290
|
-
|
|||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Loss
from discontinued operations - net of tax
|
$
|
(356,842
|
)
|
$
|
(666,198
|
)
|
Revenues
Revenues
are recognized at the time that service is completed or the related products
have been installed.
Advertising
Advertising
costs are generally expensed and are included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Total advertising expenditures for the year ended
July
31, 2008 and seven months ended July 31, 2007 were approximately $108,000 and
$2,500 respectively.
Shipping
and handling
Shipping
and handling costs associated with shipping equipment to customers are generally
expensed and included in costs of sales.
Reclassification
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior year’s financial statements to
conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications have had
no
impact on the net equity or income (loss) from operations. The
reclassification consisted of other assets being reclassified as marketable
securities. The
Company reclassified certain continuing operations to discontinued operations
for the seven months ended July 31, 2007 in the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Recently
issued pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business
Combinations.” This standard establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the
acquired and the goodwill acquired. This statement also establishes disclosure
requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for
us for acquisitions made after November 30, 2009. We are evaluating the
impact of this standard and do not expect the adoption of SFAS 141(R) to
have a material impact on its financial statements.
In
June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109" (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty
in
tax positions. This Interpretation requires that we recognize in our financial
statements the benefit of a tax position if that position is more likely than
not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position.
The provisions of FIN 48 become effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal
year, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded
as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. We adopted FIN 48 as of January
1, 2007 and do not feel that FIN 48 will have an impact on our financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements"
(FAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair
value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions
of
FAS 157 become effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. We do
not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on it consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
23
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" (FAS 158). FAS 158 requires that
employers recognize the funded status of their defined benefit pension and
other
postretirement plans on the balance sheet and recognize as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax, the plan-related gains or losses and prior
service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized
as
components of net periodic benefit cost. We do not feel the implementation
of
this will have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation
and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning
of
our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will
have on our financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No.
160”). SFAS No. 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling (minority)
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the
Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS No. 160 also requires consolidated
net
income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both
the parent and the noncontrolling interest on the face of the consolidated
statement of income. Under SFAS No. 160, the accounting for changes in a
parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in
deconsolidation must be accounted for as equity transactions for the difference
between the parent’s carrying value and the cash exchanged in the transaction.
In addition, SFAS No. 160 also requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss
in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated (except in the case of a
spin-off), and requires expanded disclosure in the Consolidated Financial
Statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent’s ownership interest and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a
subsidiary. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company
will adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009, as required, and is currently
evaluating the impact of such adoption on its financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities”, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No.
161”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures
to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. It is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 161 will have a material
impact on its financial statements.
Note
2. Business combination
As
discussed in Note 1, JavaKing Coffee, Inc. (JavaKing) entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Reorganization, pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire
all
of the outstanding shares of WhistlerTel, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Hybrid Technologies, Inc. (Hybrid). The transaction
was completed on August 19, 2005 by the issuance of 80,000,000 shares (69.56%)
of the Company's stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of
WhislerTel's common stock. The transaction has been accounted for as reverse
acquisition, because Hybrid has replaced the JavaKing shareholders as the party
in control. In a reverse acquisition the capital structure remains that of
the
legally surviving entity (JavaKing) but the historical operations is that of
the
surviving control group (WhistlerTel). On April 28, 2008, Zingo, Inc. merged
with Superlattice Power, Inc. These financials reflect the business of Zingo
Telecom up to the date it was sold, May 15, 2008, and the financials of Zingo,
Inc. and Superlattice Power, Inc.
24
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
3. Other current assets
July 31,
|
July 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,637
|
|||
Amounts
on deposit with venders
|
-
|
31,633
|
|||||
$
|
-
|
$
|
48,300
|
Note
4. Property and equipment
Property
and equipment at consists of:
July 31,
|
July 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Office
and computer equipment
|
$
|
28,430
|
$
|
114,825
|
|||
Leasehold
improvements
|
9,345
|
-
|
|||||
Software
|
-
|
19,993
|
|||||
Autos
and truck
|
-
|
12,224
|
|||||
Furniture
|
-
|
6,806
|
|||||
37,775
|
153,848
|
||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(4,172
|
)
|
(64,195
|
)
|
|||
$
|
33,603
|
$
|
89,653
|
Depreciation
expense for the year ended July 31, 2008 and seven months ended July 31, 2007,
was $34,363 and $23,570, respectively.
Note
5. Capital stock
As
discussed in Note 1 and Note 3, the Company entered into an agreement on August
19, 2005, whereby the Company issued 80,000,000 shares of its common stock
to
the shareholder of Whistler Tel, Inc. in exchange for all of the shares of
WhistlerTel. On April 15, 2008 the 80,000,000 shares were sold to Blue Diamond
Investments. On May 15, 2008, the subsidiary, Zingo Telecom, was sold to a
private investor.
During
the year ended July 31, 2007, Hybrid provided additional paid in capital in
the
amount of $5,098 to help start M/S Zingo Bpo Services Pvt. Ltd. This money
was
considered a gift and not to be repaid.
During
the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company announced a ten for one stock
split. All information related to the number of shares or per share information
has been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
25
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
6. Related party transactions
As
discussed in Note 2, the Company's principal financing source has been from
its
former parent, Hybrid Technologies, Inc. The Company has also received advances
during 2008 from its chief executive
and principal financial
officer
Ayaz Kassam. On April 15, 2008, Blue Diamond assumed Hybrid’s debt due from
Superlattice. At July 31, 2008 and July 31, 2007 the Company owed Hybrid $0
and
$3,694,403, Blue Diamond $4,321,358 and $0, and Kassam $137,410 and $0,
respectfully. During the year ended July 31, 2008 and seven months ended July
31, 2007 the Company had advances totaling $1,402,038 and $1,321,278,
respectively; and payments amounted to approximately $637,673 and $561,923,
respectively. Without such funding, the Company could not stay in
business.
The
advances from the parent company will accrue interest at a rate of 10% annually
until the obligation has been paid in full. No term has been set for repayment
and no payment is expected until the Company has begun to produce battery cells
and has become a profitable venture. The balance of the related party
transactions is due within two weeks of the parties request but does not bear
interest. Interest for the years ended July 31, 2008 and for the seven months
ended July 31, 2007 is $127,077 and $0, respectively. The related party
transaction amounts are reported as current due to the
relationship.
Note
7. Income taxes
At
July
31, 2008 and July 31, 2007, the Company has deferred tax assets as a result
of
the net operating losses incurred from inception. The resulting deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance as discussed in Note 1, equal to
the
deferred tax asset as it is unlikely, based on current circumstances, that
the
Company will ever realize a tax benefit. Deferred tax assets and the
corresponding valuation allowances amounted to approximately $1,612,000 and
$1,309,000 at July 31, 2008 and July 31, 2007 respectively. The statutory tax
rate is 35% and the effective tax rate is zero.
Under
current tax laws, the cumulative operating losses incurred amounting to
approximately $4,605,000 and $3,739,000 at July 31, 2008 and July 31, 2007
respectively, will begin to expire in 2027.
Note
8. (Loss) per share
Loss
per
share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the year. Diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing net
loss
by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares
during the specified periods. The Company has no outstanding options, warrants
or other convertible instruments that could affect the calculated number of
shares.
Note
9. Segment information
FASB
Statement No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information,
establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments.
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by
management. We are organized by geographical area.
26
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
following is financial information relating to the Company’s business
segments:
YEAR
|
SEVEN MONTHS
|
||||||
ENDED
|
ENDED
|
||||||
|
July
31, 2008
|
July
31, 2007
|
|||||
Revenue from external customers: | |||||||
United
States
|
$
|
645,632
|
$
|
783,572
|
|||
India
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Canada
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
645,632
|
$
|
783,572
|
|||
(Loss)
from operations:
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
(516,883
|
)
|
$
|
(564,788
|
)
|
|
India
|
(352,078
|
)
|
(159,780
|
)
|
|||
Canada
|
(18,420
|
)
|
(28,870
|
)
|
|||
Total
loss from operations
|
$
|
(887,381
|
)
|
$
|
(753,438
|
)
|
|
Capital
expenditures:
|
|||||||
Telecommunication
services
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
37,775
|
$
|
1,555
|
|||
India
|
14,288
|
26,924
|
|||||
Canada
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Total
capital expenditures
|
$
|
52,063
|
$
|
28,479
|
|||
Depreciation
and amortization:
|
|||||||
Telecommunication
services
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
23,470
|
$
|
20,130
|
|||
India
|
10,893
|
3,440
|
|||||
Canada
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Total
depreciation and amortization
|
$
|
34,363
|
$
|
23,570
|
Note
10. Change of year-end
The
Company changed its year-end from December 31 to July 31 beginning with the
annual reporting period ended July 31, 2007. It is not practical or
cost-justified to furnish the quarterly financial statements for the
corresponding periods of the prior year. As a result of the year-end change
and
given the lack of materiality of the prior periods compared to the current
operations, and the lack of seasonality of the Company’s business, the quarters
of the current year have been presented in comparison to the most nearly
comparable period from the originally reported quarters of the prior year as
follows with the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the seven months
ended:
27
Superlattice
Power, Inc.
(formerly
Zingo, Inc.)
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the period ending
|
Comparative period
|
|||
Q1
|
October
31, 2007
|
September
30, 2006
|
||
Q2
|
January
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2006
|
||
Q3
|
April
30, 2008
|
March
31, 2007
|
||
Q4
|
July
31, 2008
|
July
31, 2007
|
Note
11. Sale of subsidiaries
At
a
closing held on May 15, 2008, the Company sold for $215,000 the 75,000
outstanding shares of common stock, constituting 100% of the outstanding stock,
of the Company’s subsidiary Zingo Telecom, Inc. and M/S Zingo Bpo Services Pvt.
Ltd., the Company’s subsidiary incorporated in India.
The
sale
of subsidiaries was derived by recording the deposit for the sale and writing
off the following for the subsidiaries sold: assets and liabilities,
intercompany accounts, the loss in investment of the subsidiaries sold. The
gain
of $169,289 is shown on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note
12. Commitments and contingencies
Superlattice
Power, Inc entered into a month to month lease agreement with Hybrid
Technologies, Inc. for 5,000 square feet within Hybrid’s Mooresville facility on
April 16, 2008 at the rate of $2,500. Approximately 80%
of this
space has been converted into offices, and battery development workshop
including a dry room.
Total
rent expense for the year ended July 31, 2008 and seven months ended July 31,
2007 amounted to approximately $6,500 and $52,000, respectively.
In
addition, the Company has provided, as collateral to certain suppliers a letter
of credit supplied by a certain financial institution. This arrangement requires
that restricted cash be held on deposit with the financial institution and
pledged as collateral for a letter of credit provided by the financial
institution to suppliers. This restricted cash is recorded as marketable
securities - restricted and amounted to approximately $0 for July 31, 2008
and
$41,000 for July 31, 2007. As of May 15, 2008, we no longer have this letter
of
credit.
The
Company is a defendant in a case filed on June 2, 2008, in the Federal Court
for
the District of Arizona (Peter Strojnik, P.C. v. The Energy Bull et al.). The
amended complaint in this case seeks damages against The Energy Bull, the
Company and other defendants based on transmission of unsolicited facsimiles
illegally promoting the stock of the Company to the plaintiff and members of
the
class that the plaintiff purports to represent. The lawsuit seeks damages
estimated in the complaint to be between $333 million and $3 billion, as well
as
injunctive relief for the alleged sending of unsolicited faxes. The Company
denies these allegations and has filed a motion to dismiss to exclude the
Company from the lawsuit.
Under
certain circumstances, the Company could possibly be exposed to potential
liability for fines and penalties under the rules and regulations of the Federal
Communications Commission for regulatory compliance issues involving the
Company's former subsidiary Zingo Telecom, Inc., which was sold on May 15,
2008.
The Company would vigorously contest any assertion against it of liabilities
deriving from regulatory compliance issues involving this former
subsidiary.
28
Item
9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
None.
As
supervised by our board of directors and our principal executive and principal
financial officers, management has established a system of disclosure controls
and procedures and has evaluated the effectiveness of that system. The system
and its evaluation are reported on in the below Management's Annual Report
on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our principal executive and financial
officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
the 1934 Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of July 31, 2008, are
effective, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required
by
paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15.
Management's
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of
July 31, 2008. We carried out this assessment using the criteria of the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public
accounting firm, pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission that permit us to provide only management's report in this annual
report. Management concluded in this assessment that as of July 31, 2008, our
internal control over financial reporting is effective.
There
have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act)
during the fourth quarter of our 2008 fiscal year that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Item
9B. Other Information.
None.
29
PART
III
Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate
Governance.
Our
executive officers and directors and their respective ages as of October 1,
2008
are as follows:
Name
|
Age
|
Office
|
||
Ayaz
Kassam
|
42
|
President,
Chief Executive
Officer and Director |
||
Mehboob
Charania
|
51
|
Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
|
||
Holly
Roseberry
|
56
|
Director
|
The
following describes the business experience of our directors and executive
officers, including other directorships held in reporting
companies:
Ayaz
Kassam, age 42, was appointed our President and Chief Executive Officer, and
as
a Director, on June 4, 2008. He graduated and received a degree as an industrial
designer product specialist from The Ontario College of the Arts, in Toronto,
Canada, in 1990-1991. Mr. Kassam commenced his professional career at Pigeon
Branding and Design, Toronto/Oakville, Canada, in 1992, and from 1996 to 2003,
where he managed the technology and design needs of the creative services group
at Loblaws Brand Limited. In 2005, he founded and continues to operate a web
hosting company, Favorhosting Corp. From 2004 to the present, Mr. Kassam has
been an independent technical and industrial design consultant.
Mr.
Mehboob Charania was appointed as our Secretary and Chief Financial Officer,
and
a director, on August 30, 2005, and has acted as the secretary, treasurer and
chief financial officer of Hybrid Technologies since November 15, 2002. Since
June 2001, Mr. Charania has been the owner and operator of Infusion Bistro,
a
restaurant located in Calgary, Alberta. From 1998 to 2001, he acted as a manager
at IBM's Calgary office.
Ms.
Holly
Roseberry acted as the President and Chief Executive Officer from August 30,
2005 to June 4, 2008, and has been a director of Hybrid Technologies, our major
stockholder, since 2002. From 2001 to 2003, she acted as manager for the Azra
Shopping Center, Las Vegas, Nevada. She obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree
from
Sacred Heart University in Bridgeport, Connecticut in 1973. Ms. Roseberry was
employed from 1993 to 1996 as human resources manager, and from 1997 to 1999
as
business office manager, of the Las Vegas location of Wards Department Store.
Term
of
Office
Our
directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual
meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with
our
bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office
until removed by the board.
30
Section
16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's executive officers and
directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of the
Company's equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors
and
greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish
the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on its
review of the copies of such forms received by it, the Company believes that
during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 all such filing requirements
applicable to its officers and directors were complied with.
Item
11. Executive Compensation.
The
following table sets forth information for the periods indicated concerning
the
aggregate compensation paid by the Company and its subsidiaries to certain
of
the Company’s executive officers.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
The
following table sets forth information for the periods indicated concerning
the
aggregate compensation paid by the Company and its subsidiaries to certain
of
the Company’s executive officers (the “Named Executives”).
Name
and
Principal
Position
(a)
|
|
Year
(b)
|
|
Salary
($)
(c)
|
|
Bonus
($)
(d)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(e)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(f)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
(g)
|
|
Change
in
Pension
Value
and
Nonquali-
fied
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(h)
|
|
All
Other
Compen-
Sation
(i)
|
|
Total
($)
(j)
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ayaz
Kassam, President and Chief Executive Officer from June 4,
2008
|
2008
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holly
Roseberry, President and Chief Executive Officer from August 30,
2005 to
June 4, 2008
|
2007
|
$
|
12,000
|
* |
$
|
12,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$
|
11,000
|
* |
$
|
11,000
|
* Ms.
Roseberry received $11,000 of compensation in 2008 for directors and consulting
fees relating to the change in the Company’s business with the sale of Zingo
Telecom, Inc. and director’s fees of $12,000 in the twelve month period ended
July 31, 2007.
31
We
have
not entered into any employment agreement or consulting agreement with our
directors and executive officers.
There
are
no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar
benefits for directors or executive officers. Our directors and executive
officers may receive stock options at the discretion of our board of directors
in the future. We do not have any material bonus or profit sharing plans
pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our
directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at
the
discretion of our board of directors.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
We
reimburse our directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending
board
meetings. We paid Holly Roseberry $11,000 of compensation in 2008 for directors
and consulting fees relating to the change in the Company’s business with the
sale of Zingo Telecom, Inc. and director's fees of $12,000 for services rendered
as a director in the twelve month period ended July 31, 2007.
We
have
no formal plan for compensating our directors for their service in their
capacity as directors. We may grant to our directors in the future options
to
purchase shares of common stock as determined by our board of directors or
a
compensation committee which may be established in the future. Directors are
entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors.
Other than indicated in this report, no director received and/or accrued any
compensation for his or her services as a director, including committee
participation and/or special assignments.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.
The
following table sets forth, as of September 12, 2008, certain information with
respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder
known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock
and
by each of our current directors and executive officers. Each person has sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except
as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest
in
the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount
and Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percentage
of
Class(1)
|
||
Chen
Wu
187
Edward Crescent
Fort
Coquitlam, B.C. V7A 2E4
Canada
|
10,000,000
common shares
|
8.69%
|
||
Udaya
Madanayake
1532
Manning Avenue
Port
Coquitlam, B.C. V5Y 3JB
Canada
|
10,000,000
common shares
|
8.69%
|
||
Directors
and Executive Officers as a Group
|
-0-
|
-0-%
|
||
Blue
Diamond Investments Inc.
51A
Dean Street
Belize
City, Belize
|
80,000,000
common shares
|
69.56%
|
(1)
Based
on 115,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of September
12,
2008.
32
CHANGE
IN
CONTROL
Pursuant
to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 15, 2008 (the “Stock Purchase
Agreement”), with Blue Diamond Investments Inc. (the “Purchaser”), at a closing
held on April 18, 2008, Hybrid Technologies, Inc., our former principal
stockholder, sold the 80,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company held
by
us to Blue Diamond Investments, Inc. for $215,000. Pursuant to the Stock
Purchase Agreement, Hybrid Technologies also assigned to Blue Diamond
Investments all receivables or debt obligations of the Company owing to or
held
by Hybrid Technologies at March 31, 2008.
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
The
Company has received advances during 2008 from its chief executive and principal
financial officer Ayaz Kassam. On April 15, 2008, in connection with the change
in control of our company, Blue Diamond Investments, Inc. assumed our debt
due
Hybrid Technologies. At July 31, 2008 and July 31, 2007 the Company owed Hybrid
$0 and $3,694,403, Blue Diamond $4,321,358 and $0, and Ayaz Kassam $137,410
and
$0, respectfully. During the year ended July 31, 2008 and seven months ended
July 31, 2007 the Company had advances from related parties totaling $1,402,038
and $1,321,278, respectively; and payments to related parties amounted to
approximately $637,673 and $561,923, respectively.
Item
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(1)
Audit
Fees.
As
of
November 1, 2007, Mason Russell West, LLC merged with and changed their name
to
Haynie & Company. The aggregate fees billed by Haynie & Company and
Mason Russell West, LLC for professional services rendered for the audit of
our
financial statements filed as part of our 2007 Form 10-KSB filing and for review
of our interim financial statements filed as part of our first quarter Form
10-QSB filing in 2008 are $24,000.
The
aggregate fees billed by Wiener, Goodman & Company, P.C. for professional
services rendered for the audit of our financial statement filed as part of
our
2008 Form 10-K filing and for review of our interim financial statements filed
as part of our second and third quarter Form 10-Q filings for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2008 are $29,000.
(2)
Audit-Related Fees.
There
have been no audit-related fees billed by our accountants in each of the last
two fiscal years of our Company.
(3)
Tax
Fees.
There
have been no tax fees billed by our accountants in each of the last two fiscal
years of our Company.
33
(4)
All
Other Fees.
There
have been no other fees billed by our accountants in each of the last two fiscal
years of our Company.
(5) |
It
is the policy of our board of directors that before the accountant
is
engaged to render audit or non-audit services, the engagement is
approved
by the Board of Directors that is at present acting as the Audit
Committee.
|
(6)
Not
applicable.
Item
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Company. (Incorporated herein by reference
to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2,
filed
with the Commission on May 7, 2003.)
|
|
3.1a
|
Articles
of Merger, effective May 12, 2008, providing for the merger of
Superlattice Power, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
into
the Company, filed herewith.
|
|
3.2
|
By-Laws
of the Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Commission
on
May 7, 2003.)
|
|
10.1
|
Memorandum
of Understanding among Chen (Jason) Wu, Udaya Madanayake and Tony
Castro.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No.
3 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the
Commission on March 29, 2004.)
|
|
10.2
|
Agreement
between H&H Co., Ltd. and the Company, dated August 26, 2004.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, filed with the Commission on October
22,
2004.)
|
|
10.3
|
Agreement
between Beijing CXSD Investment Co., Ltd. and the Company, dated
April 30,
2004. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, filed with the Commission on October
22,
2004.)
|
|
10.4
|
Agreement
and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of August 18, 2005, among the
Company, Whistlertel, Inc. and Hybrid Technologies, Inc. (Incorporated
by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed with the Commission on August 24, 2005.)
|
|
10.5
|
License
Agreement, dated April 14, 2008, between the Company and Hybrid
Technologies, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on April
21, 2008.
|
34
10.6
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement, dated May 15, 2008, between the Company and
Heritage Asset Management Inc.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.6
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on
May 21, 2008.)
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
of Registrant, filed herewith.
|
|
31
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Principal
|
|
Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
filed
herewith.
|
||
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant
to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.
|
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SUPERLATTICE
POWER, INC.
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Ayaz Kassam
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
|
|
Date:
October 29, 2008
|
In
accordance with the Securities Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and
on the dates indicated.
By:
|
/s/
Ayaz Kassam
|
Ayaz
Kassam
|
|
(President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director)
|
|
Date:
October 29, 2008
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Holly Roseberry
|
Holly
Roseberry
|
|
Director
|
|
Date:
October 29, 2008
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Mehboob Charania
|
Mehboob
Charania
|
|
Secretary,
Treasurer and Director.
|
|
Date:
October 29, 2008
|
35
EXHIBIT
INDEX
3.1a
|
Articles
of Merger, effective May 12, 2008, providing for the merger of
Superlattice Power, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
into
the Company, filed herewith.
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
of Registrant.
|
31
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant
to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant
to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
36