DallasNews Corp - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2007
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file no. 1-33741
A. H. Belo Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 38-3765318 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
P. O. Box 224866 | ||
Dallas, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
75222-4866 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (214) 977-8200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Series A Common Stock, $.01 par value Preferred Share Purchase Rights |
New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Series B Common Stock, $.01 par value
(Title of class)
Series B Common Stock, $.01 par value
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405
of the Act) Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
Yes o No þ.
Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o
No þ.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer: o | Accelerated filer: o | Non-accelerated filer: þ | Smaller reporting company: o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ.
There was no aggregate market value of the registrants voting stock held by nonaffiliates on
June 30, 2007 due to the fact that the registrant was not
incorporated until October 1, 2007.
Shares of
Common Stock outstanding at March 15, 2008: 20,478,022 shares. (Consisting of
17,629,526 shares of Series A Common Stock and 2,848,496 shares of Series B Common
Stock.)
Documents incorporated by reference: None
A. H. BELO CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Balance
Sheet of A.H. Belo Corporation |
||
63 | ||
64 | ||
65 | ||
Combined
Financial Statements of the A.H. Belo Businesses |
||
66 | ||
67 | ||
68 | ||
70 | ||
71 | ||
72 |
(i)
Table of Contents
Statements in this communication concerning A. H. Belo Corporations (A. H. Belo or
the Company) business outlook or future economic performance, anticipated profitability,
revenues, expenses, dividends, capital expenditures, investments, future financings, and other
financial and non-financial items that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements
as the term is defined under applicable federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are
subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those statements.
Such risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited to, changes in capital
market conditions and prospects, and other factors such as changes in advertising demand, interest
rates and newsprint prices; newspaper circulation matters, including changes in readership patterns
and demography, and audits and related actions by the Audit Bureau of Circulations; circulation
trends; technological changes; development of Internet commerce; industry cycles; changes in
pricing or other actions by competitors and suppliers; regulatory, tax and legal changes; adoption
of new accounting standards or changes in existing accounting standards by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board or other accounting standard-setting bodies or authorities; the effects of Company
acquisitions, dispositions and co-owned ventures; general economic conditions; significant armed
conflict; and other factors beyond our control, as well as other risks detailed elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K and in A. H. Belos other public disclosures, and filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including A. H. Belos information statement on Form
10 dated January 31, 2008.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Recent Developments
A. H. Belo Corporation was incorporated under Delaware law on October 1, 2007, as a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Belo. Corp. (Belo), to serve as a holding company in anticipation of
the pro-rata distribution to Belo shareholders of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of A. H.
Belos common stock. For purposes of this Annual Report, references to the Company, we, us,
our and A. H. Belo mean A. H. Belo
Corporation collectively with all of our subsidiaries unless the
context otherwise requires.
On
the Distribution Date (the Distribution Date), Belo
contributed to A. H. Belo all of Belos subsidiaries
engaged in Belos newspaper business and related assets and liabilities. The assets and
liabilities transferred to A. H. Belo were recorded at historical cost as a reorganization of
entities under common control in the first quarter of 2008.
On the Distribution Date, the distribution was completed in the form of a pro-rata dividend to
Belos shareholders of 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo common stock for each share of Belos common stock
owned at the close of business on January 25, 2008. Belo received a private letter ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) to the effect that the distribution is tax-free to Belo
shareholders for United States federal income tax purposes, except with respect to cash paid
instead of fractional shares.
On the Distribution Date, Belo settled or assigned intercompany indebtedness between and among Belo
and its subsidiaries, including Belos subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper business and related
assets. Belo settled accounts through contributions of such indebtedness to the capital of the
debtor subsidiaries, distributions by creditor subsidiaries, and other non-cash transfers, or
assigned indebtedness to A. H. Belo. As of the effective time of the distribution, Belo had
contributed to the capital of A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries the net intercompany indebtedness
owed to Belo by A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries and A. H. Belo assumed the indebtedness owed by
Belo to the A. H. Belo subsidiaries.
On
the Distribution Date, as a consequence of the distribution, A. H. Belo became a separate public
company. Belo has no further ownership interest in A. H. Belo or in any newspaper or related
businesses, and A. H. Belo has no ownership interest in Belo or in any television station or
related businesses. A. H. Belos relationship with Belo is now governed by a separation and
distribution agreement and several ancillary agreements with Belo governing various
relationships between A. H. Belo and Belo. A. H. Belo also co-owns
certain downtown Dallas, Texas real estate used in their respective
businesses.
On
February 4, 2008, in anticipation of the distribution the
Company entered into a $100 million senior revolving credit
facility effective as of the Distribution Date. The terms of the new credit facility are more fully described in Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
1
Table of Contents
A. H. Belos Business
A. H. Belos publishing roots trace to The Galveston Daily News, which began publication in
1842. Today, A. H. Belo owns three primary daily newspapers: The Dallas Morning News, The
Providence Journal and The Press-Enterprise. They produce extensive local, state, national and
international news. In addition to these three daily newspapers, A. H. Belo publishes various niche
products in the same or nearby markets where these daily newspapers are published. Each of A. H.
Belos daily newspapers and niche publications operates its own related Web site. A. H. Belo also
operates direct mail and commercial printing businesses.
The Dallas Morning News first edition was published on October 1, 1885; the newspaper is one
of the leading newspapers in America. Its success is founded upon the highest standards of
journalistic excellence, with an emphasis on comprehensive local news and information, and
community service. The Dallas Morning News is distributed primarily in Dallas County and the 11
surrounding counties. It has earned eight Pulitzer Prizes since 1986 for its news reporting and
photography.
The Providence Journal, acquired by Belo in February 1997, is the leading newspaper in Rhode
Island and southeastern Massachusetts. The Providence Journal is Americas oldest major daily
newspaper of general circulation and continuous publication, and has won four Pulitzer Prizes.
The Press-Enterprise was acquired in July 1997. The Press-Enterprise is distributed throughout
Southern Californias Inland Empire area, which includes Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. It
has a long history of journalistic excellence and has won one Pulitzer Prize.
The following table sets forth circulation information concerning A. H. Belos primary daily
newspaper operations:
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Daily | Sunday | Daily | Sunday | Daily | Sunday | |||||||||||||||||||
Newspaper | Circulation(1) | Circulation | Circulation(1) | Circulation | Circulation(1) | Circulation | ||||||||||||||||||
The Dallas Morning
News |
462,075 | (2) | 640,742 | (2) | 405,048 | (2) | 566,608 | (2) | 372,810 | (3) | 523,313 | (3) | ||||||||||||
The Providence
Journal |
163,909 | (4) | 231,593 | (4) | 159,788 | (5) | 212,971 | (5) | 149,966 | (6) | 198,973 | (6) | ||||||||||||
The Press-Enterprise |
176,577 | (7) | 179,390 | (7) | 169,362 | (7) | 178,788 | (7) | 162,464 | (8) | 171,114 | (8) | ||||||||||||
(1) | Daily circulation is defined as a Monday through Saturday six-day average. | |
(2) | Average paid circulation data for The Dallas Morning News is according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations (Audit Bureau) audit reports for the six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively. | |
(3) | Average paid circulation data for The Dallas Morning News is obtained from its Publishers Statement for the six-month period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Audit Bureau, subject to audit. | |
(4) | Average paid circulation data for The Providence Journal is obtained from its Publishers Statement for the twenty-six weeks ended September 25, 2005. | |
(5) | Average paid circulation data for The Providence Journal is obtained from its Publishers Statement for the twenty-seven weeks ended October 1, 2006. | |
(6) | Average paid circulation data for The Providence Journal is obtained from its Publishers Statement for the twenty-six weeks ended September 23, 2007, as filed with the Audit Bureau, subject to audit. | |
(7) | The average paid circulation data for 2005 and 2006 for The Press Enterprise is obtained from its Publishers Statement for the six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively. | |
(8) | Average paid circulation data for The Press-Enterprise is obtained from its Publishers Statement for the six months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Audit Bureau, subject to audit. |
The Company derives its revenues primarily from the sale of advertising and newspapers and
from commercial printing. For the year ended December 31, 2007, advertising revenues accounted for
approximately 81 percent of total revenues. Circulation revenues accounted for approximately 15
percent of total revenues for 2007. Prices for the Companys newspapers are established
individually for each newspaper. Commercial printing accounted for most of the remainder of the
Companys revenues.
2
Table of Contents
Belo Interactive Media (BIM) supports A. H. Belos and Belos Web sites, and Belo
Technologies supports information technology requirements. BIM and
Belo Technologies, which are owned by A. H. Belo, provide services to Belo and its television Web sites pursuant to inter-company agreements whereby
Belo compensates A. H. Belo for such services.
Web sites operated by A. H. Belos newspapers provide consumers with timely news and
information. The newspaper-affiliated Web sites for The Dallas Morning News, The Providence
Journal, and The Press-Enterprise are leading local media sites in their respective markets.
Revenues for interactive media for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 represented
approximately 7.0 and 5.0 percent, respectively, of the total revenues and were derived principally
from advertising on the various Web sites. In addition, A. H. Belo owns 6.6 percent of Classified
Ventures, LLC, a joint venture of which the other owners are Gannett Co., Inc., The McClatchy
Company, Tribune Company, and The Washington Post Company. The three principal online businesses
Classified Ventures, LLC operates are: cars.com, apartments.com, and homegain.com. A. H. Belo has
agreed to share certain ownership attributes of Classified Ventures, LLC with Belo.
The basic material used in publishing newspapers is newsprint. Currently, most of the
Companys newsprint is obtained through a purchasing consortium of which the Company is a member.
Management believes the Companys sources of newsprint, along with available alternate sources, are
adequate for the Companys current needs.
During 2007, the Companys operations consumed approximately 136,546 metric tons of newsprint
at an average cost of $586 per metric ton. Consumption of newsprint in the previous year was
approximately 166,756 metric tons at an average cost per metric ton of $631. Newsprint prices
decreased approximately 7.1 percent in 2007. Consolidation in the North American newsprint
industry has reduced the number of suppliers and has led to paper mill closures and conversions to
other grades of paper, which in turn has decreased overall newsprint capacity and increased the
likelihood of future price increases.
Since 2005, A. H. Belo has experienced a decline in net operating revenues and net earnings
primarily due to decreased advertising revenues. The decrease in
advertising revenues, particularly in the classified category, resulted from
increased competition for advertising dollars from other media, particularly the Internet. In
response to these decreases, A. H. Belo has launched innovative print and online products and has
established strategic partnerships with major Internet companies. Since 2002, revenues from our
newspaper Web sites have experienced double-digit annual growth. A. H. Belo has also in recent
years focused on neighborhood and other local community news, both in print and online. In
addition, A. H. Belo has implemented measures to control or decrease operating expenses. These
measures include modifying distribution and marketing strategies to allow our newspapers to
concentrate on circulation most valued by advertisers and restructuring our newspapers through
organizational realignments.
Our Competitive Strengths and Challenges
Our strengths are:
| ownership and proven management of three quality daily newspapers that have been widely recognized over the years for their distinguished journalism. | ||
| the three daily newspapers locations in markets with projected population growth rates above the national average. | ||
| a strong, cohesive senior management team with significant sector experience focused on strategic and operating issues. | ||
| an initial debt-free capital structure with the financial flexibility to allocate capital toward higher-growth online initiatives, support continued innovation, and maintain a sharp focus on distinguished journalism and editorial content. | ||
| resources to compete in a challenging operating environment and return cash to shareholders through an attractive dividend. | ||
| strategic and financial flexibility to form partnerships and alliances unencumbered by considerations of the potential effect on Belos television business. |
Our newspapers, and the newspaper industry as a whole, are experiencing challenges to maintain
and grow print revenues and circulation. This results from, among other factors, increased
competition from other media, particularly the Internet. A prolonged decline in circulation could
further affect advertising revenues; however, A. H. Belos newspapers have grown in total readership over
the past five years. Readership, as defined by the Company, includes circulation (including ancillary niche products) and traffic on their online Web sites.
3
Table of Contents
Our Strategies and Opportunities
The Company is committed to publishing newspapers and online content of the highest quality
and integrity, creating and developing innovative print and online products addressing the needs of
customers and advertisers, providing an attractive dividend, and creating value for
shareholders over the long-term. The Company intends to achieve these
objectives through the
following strategies:
| focusing managements attention on operating A. H. Belos core newspaper businesses and related Web sites to derive maximum revenue and earnings in an Internet-centric media environment by building larger digital businesses. | ||
| being attentive to the needs of our customers and advertisers by implementing initiatives to better reach consumers that advertisers most desire. | ||
| innovating and continuing to develop print and online products that create sustainable incremental revenue and earnings. | ||
| strengthening and improving our underlying technology platform. | ||
| maintaining a conservative balance sheet. | ||
| continuing our commitment of service to the local communities we serve. |
Competition
The Company faces competition for advertising, and on-line advertising dollars, and circulation, The competition for
advertising, dollars comes from local, regional, and national newspapers, the Internet, magazines,
broadcast, cable and satellite television, radio, direct mail, yellow pages, and other media. A. H.
Belo also competes for advertising dollars with certain television stations and related Web sites
owned by Belo. Increased competition has come from the Internet and other new media formats and
services other than traditional newspapers, many of which are often free to users. Free circulation
daily newspapers have been recently introduced in several metropolitan markets, and there can be no
assurance that free daily publications, or other publications, will not be introduced in any
markets in which A. H. Belo publishes its newspapers. The Dallas Morning News has one major
metropolitan daily newspaper competitor in certain areas of the Dallas/Fort Worth market. The
Providence Journal competes with five daily newspapers in the Rhode Island and southeastern
Massachusetts markets. The Press-Enterprise competes with seven daily newspapers in the Inland
Empire area of southern California.
Seasonality
A. H. Belos advertising revenues are subject to moderate seasonality, with advertising
revenues typically higher in the fourth calendar quarter of each year because of the holiday
shopping season. The level of advertising sales in any period may also be affected by advertisers
decisions to increase or decrease their advertising expenditures in response to anticipated
consumer demand and general economic conditions.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately 3,400 full-time and 280 part-time
employees, including approximately 530 employees represented by various employee unions. All of
these union-represented employees are located in Providence, Rhode Island. The Company believes its relations
with its employees are satisfactory.
Available Information
A. H. Belo maintains its corporate Web site at www.ahbelo.com. The Company makes available,
free of charge, on its Web site, this Annual Report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form
10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as
reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
4
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and managements public comments from time to time
may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These
statements are based on managements current knowledge and estimates of factors affecting our
operations, both known and unknown. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking information as actual results may differ materially from those currently
anticipated. The following discussion identifies some of the factors that may cause actual results
to differ materially from expectations. In addition, a number of other factors (those identified
elsewhere in this document and others, both known and unknown) may cause actual results to differ
materially from expectations.
Risks Resulting from the Recently Completed Distribution
A. H. Belo has no operating history as a separate public company and may be unable to operate
profitably as a stand-alone company.
A. H. Belo has no operating history as a separate public company. Historically, because the
newspaper and the television businesses that comprised Belo have been under one ultimate parent,
they have been able to rely to some degree on the earnings, assets, and cash flow of each other for
capital requirements. As a result of the distribution, A. H. Belo now
relies only on the newspaper business
and related businesses for such requirements. A. H. Belo cannot assure you that, as a separate
public company, operating results will continue at historical levels, or that the Company will be
profitable. Additionally, A. H. Belo has relied on Belo for various financial, administrative, and
managerial services in conducting its operations. Following the distribution, A. H. Belo maintains
its own credit and banking relationships and performs its own financial and investor relations
functions. Although A. H. Belo employs certain key former employees of Belo following the distribution,
there can be no assurance that A. H. Belo will be able to successfully put in place, or thereafter
maintain, the financial functions, administration, and management necessary to operate as a
separate company or that A. H. Belo will not incur additional costs operating as a separate public
company. For example, prior to the distribution, A. H. Belo, as part of Belos business, was able
to use Belos size to procure products and services on favorable terms. A. H. Belo could experience
some increased costs as a result of the absence of such economies of scale.
Any such additional or increased costs could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
A. H. Belos historical financial information may not be indicative of our future results as a
separate public company.
The historical financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not
reflect what A. H. Belos results of operations, financial position, and cash flows would have been
had it been a separate public company during the periods presented, or be indicative of what its
results of operations, financial position, and cash flows may be in the future as a separate public
company. A. H. Belos historical financial information reflects allocations for services
historically provided by Belo, and these allocated costs may be different from the actual costs A.
H. Belo will incur for these services in the future as a separate public company, including with
respect to actual services provided to A. H. Belo by Belo under a services agreement and other
agreements. In some instances, the costs incurred for these services as a separate public company
may be higher than the share of total Belo expenses allocated to A. H. Belo historically.
For additional information about the past financial performance of A. H. Belos business and
the basis of the presentation of the historical financial statements, see Item 6. Selected
Financial Data, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations, and the Combined Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes included elsewhere
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
A. H. Belo may incur increased costs after the distribution or as a result of the distribution
that may cause our profitability to decline.
A. H. Belo needs to replicate certain systems, infrastructure, and personnel to which it no
longer has access after the distribution from Belo. In addition, there may be an adverse
operational effect on A. H. Belos business as a result of the significant time A. H. Belos
management and other employees and internal resources will need to dedicate to building these
capabilities during the first few years following the distribution that otherwise would be
available for other business initiatives and opportunities. A. H. Belo may incur capital and other
costs associated with developing and implementing its own support functions in these areas. These
costs may exceed the costs A. H. Belo will pay to Belo during the transition period.
5
Table of Contents
A. H. Belo may incur increased expenses if the services agreement with Belo is terminated.
In connection with the distribution, A. H. Belo entered into a services agreement with Belo.
This agreement provides that A. H. Belo and Belo will furnish each other services in such areas as
employee benefits administration, risk management, claims administration and reporting, tax, payroll, internal audit, and other areas where A. H. Belo and Belo may need assistance and support
following the distribution. Depending on the particular service being provided, the agreement
extends for up to two years after the distribution, but may be terminated earlier under certain
circumstances, including a default. If the agreement is terminated, A. H. Belo may be required to
obtain such services from a third party. This could be more expensive than the fees that A. H. Belo
is required to pay under the services agreement.
A. H. Belos directors and executive officers have significant combined voting power and
significant influence over our management and affairs.
Our
directors and executive officers, hold 58.5 percent of the voting power of our outstanding
voting stock as of March 15, 2008. A. H. Belos Series A common stock has one vote per share and
Series B common stock has ten votes per share. Generally, except for certain extraordinary
corporate transactions, all matters to be voted on by A. H. Belos shareholders must be approved by
a majority of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock, voting as a single class. Certain
extraordinary corporate transactions, such as a merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially
all of our property and assets, or a dissolution, the alteration, amendment, or repeal of A. H.
Belos bylaws by shareholders, and certain amendments to A. H. Belos certificate of incorporation, require the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of our outstanding
voting stock, voting as a single class. Accordingly, A. H. Belos directors and executive officers
will have significant influence over our management and affairs and over all matters requiring
shareholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions.
This ownership may limit your ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, A. H. Belo
may take actions that you, or even the majority of shareholders, do not view as beneficial.
Certain members of management, directors, and shareholders may face actual or potential
conflicts of interest.
The management and directors of A. H. Belo and Belo own both A. H. Belo common stock and Belo
common stock. Robert W. Decherd serves as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Belo and as
Chairman of the Board, president and Chief Executive Officer of A. H. Belo. Mr. Decherd and
Dealey D. Herndon, his sister, serve as directors of A. H. Belo and Belo. James M. Moroney III,
executive vice president of A. H. Belo and the Publisher and Chief Executive Officer of The Dallas
Morning News, is their second cousin. Mr. Moroney also serves as a director of Belo. This ownership
overlap and these common directors could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of
interest when A. H. Belos and Belos management and directors face decisions that could have
different implications for A. H. Belo and Belo. For example, potential conflicts of interest could
arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute between A. H. Belo and Belo regarding the
terms of the agreements governing the distribution and the relationship between A. H. Belo and Belo
thereafter. These agreements include, among others, the separation and distribution agreement, the
tax matters agreement, the employee matters agreement, the services agreement, and any other
agreements between the parties or their affiliates. Potential conflicts of interest could also
arise out of any commercial arrangements that A. H. Belo and Belo may enter into in the future. In
addition, A. H. Belo and Belo will compete with each other in
Dallas/Fort Worth, where each company
owns significant properties.
Risks Relating to A. H. Belos Business
If A. H. Belo is unable to respond to evolving industry trends and changes in technology, its
business may not be able to compete effectively.
Print circulation and readership of A. H. Belos newspapers, and the newspaper industry
overall, are subject to competition and, in particular, are being affected by the preferences of
some consumers to receive all or a portion of their news in new media formats and from sources
other than traditional newspapers, and by the proliferation of these new media formats and sources.
Information delivery and programming alternatives such as the Internet, cable, direct
satellite-to-home services, pay-per-view, and home video and entertainment systems have
fractionalized newspaper readership. Over the past decade, the Internet, cable television
programming services, and other emerging media distribution platforms have captured increasing
market share, while the aggregate print circulation of the major newspapers has declined.
6
Table of Contents
Decreases in advertising spending, resulting from an economic downturn, business combinations,
natural disasters, war, terrorism, or other factors specific to the communities served by the
Company, could adversely affect A. H. Belos financial condition and results of operations. In
addition, A. H. Belos revenues are subject to seasonal, cyclical, and other fluctuations that
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Approximately
81 percent or more of A. H. Belos revenues for each of the last three fiscal years were
generated from the sale of advertising appearing in its newspapers. Advertisers generally reduce
their advertising spending during economic downturns, so a recession or economic downturn could
have an adverse effect on A. H. Belos financial condition and results of operations.
A. H. Belos advertising revenues depend upon a variety of other factors specific to the
communities served by the Company. Changes in those factors could affect advertising revenues.
These factors include, among others, the size and demographic characteristics of the local
population, the concentration of retail stores, and local economic conditions in general.
A. H. Belos revenues and results of operations are subject to seasonal, cyclical, and other
fluctuations that are expected to continue. Seasonal and cyclical factors that
affect A. H. Belos revenues and results of operations may be beyond A. H. Belos control,
including changes in the pricing policies of competitors, the hiring and retention of key
personnel, wage and cost pressures, changes in newsprint prices, and general economic factors.
Fluctuations in revenues and results of operations may cause A. H. Belos stock price to be
volatile.
A. H. Belos businesses operate in highly competitive markets, such as Dallas/Fort Worth, and
our ability to maintain market share and generate revenues depends on
how effectively the Company competes
with existing and new competition.
Our businesses operate in highly competitive markets. Our newspapers compete for audiences and
advertising revenue with other newspapers as well as with the Internet, magazines, broadcast, cable
and satellite television, radio, direct mail, and yellow pages. A. H. Belo and Belo will compete
with each other in Dallas/Fort Worth where each company owns significant properties. Some of A. H.
Belos current and potential competitors have greater financial and other resources available to
them.
A. H. Belos newspaper publications generate significant percentages of their advertising
revenues from limited numbers of sources. In recent years, Web sites dedicated to automotive,
employment, real estate advertising, and general classified
advertising have become significant competitors of A. H. Belos
newspapers and Web sites. As a result, even in the absence of a recession or economic downturn,
technological, industry, and other changes specifically affecting these advertising sources could
reduce advertising revenues and adversely affect A. H. Belos financial condition and results of
operations.
A. H. Belos revenues primarily consist of advertising and paid circulation. Competition for
advertising expenditures and paid circulation comes from local,
regional, and national newspapers (including free daily newspapers),
magazines, broadcast, cable and satellite television, radio, direct mail, yellow pages, the
Internet, outdoor billboards, and other media. The National Do Not Call Registry has affected the
way newspapers solicit home-delivery circulation, particularly for larger newspapers that
historically have relied on telemarketing. Competition for newspaper advertising revenue is based
largely upon advertiser results, advertising rates, readership, demographics, and circulation
levels. Competition for circulation is based largely upon the content of the newspaper, its price,
editorial quality, customer service, and other sources of news and information. Our local and
regional competitors are community newspapers that are typically unique to each market, but the Company
has competitors for advertising revenues that are larger and have greater financial and
distribution resources. Circulation revenues and our ability to achieve price increases for our
print products may be affected by competition from other publications and other forms of media
available in our various markets, declining consumer spending on discretionary items like
newspapers, decreasing amounts of free time, and declining frequency of regular newspaper buying
among certain demographics. A. H. Belo may incur higher costs competing for advertising dollars and
paid circulation, and if the Company is not able to compete effectively for advertising dollars and
paid circulation, revenues may continue to decline and our financial condition and results of operations may be
adversely affected.
7
Table of Contents
Decreases
in circulation may adversely affect A. H. Belos circulation and advertising
revenues.
The
table below presents the components of our net operating revenues for the last three
years:
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 600,335 | (10.9 | %) | $ | 674,140 | (1.9 | %) | $ | 687,140 | ||||||||||
Circulation |
112,635 | (3.1 | %) | 116,265 | 11.0 | % | 104,790 | |||||||||||||
Other |
25,698 | (6.0 | %) | 27,328 | (10.1 | %) | 30,414 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 738,668 | (9.7 | %) | $ | 817,733 | (0.6 | %) | $ | 822,344 |
As a result of the change in distribution methods at The Dallas Morning News, circulation
revenue increased approximately $24,555 in 2006. However, when measured on a comparable basis,
circulation revenue actually decreased 1.8 percent in 2006 from 2005.
A. H. Belos newspapers, and the newspaper industry as a whole, are experiencing challenges to
maintain and grow print circulation and circulation revenues. A prolonged decline in circulation
could affect the rate and volume of advertising revenues. To maintain our circulation base, A. H.
Belo may incur additional costs, and may not be able to recover these costs through circulation and
advertising revenues. To address declining circulation, the Company may increase spending on
marketing designed to retain our existing subscriber base and continue or create niche publications
targeted at specific market groups. The Company may also increase marketing efforts to drive
traffic to our proprietary Web sites. There are no current plans to materially increase such
spending or marketing.
A. H. Belo anticipates that readership will become increasingly important now that the Audit
Bureau of Circulations has agreed to publish readership statistics and recognize Internet use in
addition to print circulation information. The Company believes this is a positive industry development
but cannot predict its effect on advertising revenues.
A significant increase in the cost of newsprint, or a reduction in the availability of
newsprint, could adversely affect A. H. Belos publishing business.
The basic raw material for newspapers is newsprint, which has historically been between
approximately 11 percent and 14 percent of revenues. The price of newsprint historically has been
volatile. Consolidation in the North American newsprint industry has reduced the number of
suppliers and has led to paper mill closures and conversions to other grades of paper, which in
turn has decreased overall newsprint capacity and increased the likelihood of future price
increases. A. H. Belo currently purchases most of its newsprint through a purchasing consortium of
which it is a member. Our inability to obtain an adequate supply of newsprint in the future or
significant increases in newsprint costs could affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Adverse
results from pending or new litigation or governmental proceedings or investigations
could adversely affect A. H. Belos financial condition and results of operations.
From
time to time A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries are subject to litigation, governmental
proceedings, and investigations. Current matters include those described under Item 3. Legal
Proceedings. Adverse determinations in any of these pending or future matters could require A. H.
Belo to make monetary payments or result in other sanctions or findings that could affect our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
8
Table of Contents
A. H. Belo depends on key personnel and may not be able to operate and grow our business
effectively if A. H. Belo loses the services of any of our senior executive officers or are unable
to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future.
A. H. Belo depends on the efforts of its senior executive officers. The success of our
business depends heavily on our ability to retain current management and to attract and retain
qualified personnel in the future. Competition for senior management personnel is intense and A. H.
Belo may not be able to retain its key personnel. The Company has not entered into employment
agreements with key management personnel and does not have key person insurance for any of our
senior executive officers or other key personnel. To mitigate this risk, A. H. Belo has adopted a
change in control severance plan covering key management personnel that is triggered under certain
conditions if a change in control occurs.
A. H. Belos business may be negatively affected by work stoppages, slowdowns, or strikes by
our employees.
Currently, one of A. H. Belos primary newspapers is party to collective bargaining agreements
with unions representing approximately 530 of its employees. All of these agreements will expire
within approximately four years, unless extended. A. H. Belo cannot assure investors about the
results of negotiation of future collective bargaining agreements, whether future collective
bargaining agreements will be negotiated without interruptions in our business, or the possible
effect of future collective bargaining agreements on our business, financial condition, and results
of operations. The Company also cannot assure investors that strikes or work stoppages will not
occur in the future in connection with labor negotiations or otherwise. Any prolonged strike or
work stoppage could adversely effect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
A. H. Belo owns and operates a newspaper printing facility and distribution center in Plano,
Texas, to print The Dallas Morning News and other publications. A. H. Belo also owns a
distribution and collating facility for The Dallas Morning News in southern Dallas and owns a
printing facility in Arlington, Texas, used for commercial printing. Additional operations of The
Dallas Morning News are housed in a four-story building and in parts of a separate 17-story office
building (The Belo Building) in downtown Dallas, Texas. A. H. Belo also leases space in downtown
Dallas, for BIM operations, and in Irving, Texas, for a secondary data center.
After an assessment of their respective downtown Dallas real estate needs, A. H. Belo and Belo
agreed to co-own, through the creation of a limited liability company (LLC), The Belo Building,
related parking sites, and specified other downtown real estate. A. H. Belo and Belo each own 50
percent of the LLC and lease from the LLC 50 percent of the available rental space in The Belo Building and
related parking sites under long-term leases that are terminable under various
conditions. A third party real estate services firm, engaged by the LLC, manages The Belo Building
and other real estate owned by the LLC.
In addition, A. H. Belo and Belo have agreed to exchange certain real estate interests they or
their subsidiaries own in an approximately 10-acre downtown Dallas campus jointly used today by The
Dallas Morning News and Belos WFAA-TV and Texas Cable News (TXCN). As a result of the exchange,
The Dallas Morning News will own a single parcel (or contiguous parcels) containing the land and
improvements that it uses in its operations, and WFAA-TV, TXCN, and Belo will likewise own a single parcel
(or contiguous parcels) containing the land and improvements used by WFAA-TV and TXCN. Depending on
their needs, A. H. Belo (or a related entity) and Belo (or a related entity) may also enter into
lease or use agreements for specified parts of the campus real estate properties. The terms of such
agreements, including the compensation to be paid, will be determined by arms-length negotiations
between A. H. Belo and Belo.
A. H. Belo owns and operates a newspaper printing facility in Providence, Rhode Island, for
The Providence Journal. The remainder of The Providence Journals operations is housed in an owned,
five-story building in downtown Providence.
A. H. Belo owns and operates a newspaper publishing facility and a commercial printing
facility in downtown Riverside, California, for The Press-Enterprise and other company and third
party publications. The Company owns a
9
Table of Contents
state-of-the-art
media center for The Press-Enterprise, which also houses the non-production operations of The Press-Enterprise.
The Company has additional leasehold and other interests that are used in our activities,
which are not material. The Company believes our properties are in satisfactory condition and are
well maintained and that such properties are adequate for present operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In 2004, Belo announced that an internal investigation, then ongoing, disclosed practices and
procedures that led to an overstatement of previously reported circulation figures at The Dallas
Morning News, primarily in single copy sales. In response to the overstatement, Belo implemented a
voluntary advertiser plan developed by Belo management. The plan included cash payments to
advertisers and future advertising credits. Payments under the plan were made without any condition
that such advertisers release The Dallas Morning News from liability for the circulation
overstatement. To use the credits, advertisers generally placed advertising in addition to the
terms of the advertisers current contract. There are no unused credits.
On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004, and October 5, 2004, three related lawsuits were filed by
purported shareholders of Belo in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Texas against Belo, Robert W. Decherd, and Barry T. Peckham, a former executive officer of The
Dallas Morning News. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement at The Dallas
Morning News announced by Belo in 2004, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated
Belos financial results and thereby injured investors. The plaintiffs seek to represent a
purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6,
2004. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. On October 18, 2004, the court ordered the consolidation of all cases arising out of the
same facts and presenting the same claims, and on February 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed an amended,
consolidated complaint adding as defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, and Dennis A.
Williamson, all of whom are current or retired executive officers of Belo, and James M.
Moroney III, an executive officer of The Dallas Morning News. On May 18, 2007, the court partially
granted defendants motions to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint to the extent it
dismissed plaintiffs complaint as to defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, and Dennis A.
Williamson. The motions to dismiss were denied as to the other defendants. On September 19, 2007,
plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification; defendants filed their response to this
motion on October 26, 2007. Plaintiffs filed their reply to the response on November 16, 2007. On
November 26, 2007, the court denied defendants motion for reconsideration of the courts denial of
defendants motion to dismiss as to the remaining defendants. No class or classes have been
certified and no amount of damages has been specified. The Company believes the complaints are
without merit and intend to defend vigorously against them.
On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual
shareholder of Belo in the 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W.
Decherd, John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson, and James M. Moroney III; Barry T.
Peckham; and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R.
Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr.,
Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak, and Arturo Madrid, current or
former directors of Belo. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of
fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News. On May 30,
2007, after a prior discovery stay ended, the court issued an order administratively closing the
case. Under the courts order, the case is stayed and, as a result, no further action can be taken
unless the case is reinstated. The court retained jurisdiction and the case is subject to being
reinstated by the court or upon motion by any party. The courts order was not a dismissal with
prejudice.
Under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement between A. H. Belo and Belo, A.
H. Belo and Belo will share equally in any liabilities, net of any applicable insurance, resulting
from the circulation-related lawsuits described above.
In 2004, the staff of the SEC notified Belo that it was conducting a newspaper industry-wide
inquiry into circulation practices, and inquired specifically about The Dallas Morning News
circulation overstatement. Belo briefed the SEC on The Dallas Morning News circulation situation
and related matters. The information voluntarily provided to the SEC related to The Dallas Morning
News, as well as The Providence Journal and The Press-Enterprise. On October 1, 2007, the SEC staff
sent counsel for Belo a letter stating that the inquiry has been
completed and that the SEC staff does
not intend to recommend any enforcement action by the SEC.
On October 24, 2006, eighteen former employees of The Dallas Morning News filed a lawsuit
against various A. H. Belo-related parties in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Texas. The plaintiffs lawsuit
10
Table of Contents
alleges unlawful discrimination and ERISA violations and
includes allegations relating to The Dallas Morning News circulation overstatement (similar to the
circulation-related lawsuits described above). In June 2007, the court issued a memorandum order
granting in part and denying in part defendants motion to dismiss. In August 2007, the court
dismissed certain additional claims. A trial date in January 2009 has been set. The Company
believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend vigorously against it.
In addition to the proceedings disclosed above, a number of other legal proceedings are
pending against A. H. Belo, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the
opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not
have a material adverse effect on A. H. Belos results of operations, liquidity, or financial
position.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
The Companys authorized common equity consists of 125,000,000 shares of common stock, par
value $.01 per share. The Company has two series of common stock outstanding, Series A and Series
B. Shares of the two series are identical in all respects except as noted herein. Series B shares
are entitled to 10 votes per share on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders; Series A
shares are entitled to one vote per share. Transferability of the Series B shares is limited to
family members and affiliated entities of the holder and Series B shares are convertible at any
time on a one-for-one basis into Series A shares, and upon a transfer other than as described
above, Series B shares automatically convert into Series A shares. Shares of the Companys Series A
common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE symbol: AHC). There is no established
public trading market for shares of Series B common stock. Our Series A common stock began trading
on February 11, 2008, and as such, no information exists regarding high and low stock prices for
the last two years. The closing price of our Series A common stock on March 15, 2008 was $11.44.
The approximate number of shareholders of record of our Series A and Series B common stock at
the close of business on March 15, 2008 was 577 and 289, respectively.
A. H. Belos dividend is expected to
be $1.00 per share, annually. The declaration and
payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of A. H. Belos
Board of Directors, and any determination as to the payment of such dividends, as well as the
amount and timing of such dividends, will depend on, among other things, A. H. Belos results of
operations and financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt covenants, other
contractual restrictions, prospects, applicable law, general economic and business conditions, and
other future factors that A. H. Belos Board of Directors deems relevant. A. H. Belo cannot provide
any assurance that any dividends will be declared and paid, due to factors previously stated in
Item 1A. Risk Factors. In addition, the Company entered into a bank credit facility agreement
that contains a negative covenant requiring the Company to be in pro forma compliance with the
Fixed Charge Coverage ratio (the ratio of interest and other fixed
charges to the Companys consolidated EBITDA less capital
expenditures), before any dividends can be paid.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company did not repurchase any Series A or Series B common stock during the quarter ended
December 31, 2007.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
In connection with its incorporation, on October 1, 2007, A. H. Belo issued 1,000 shares of A.
H. Belo common stock, par value $.01 per share, to Belo Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Belo, in
consideration of an aggregate capital contribution of $1,000 by Belo Holdings. A. H. Belo did not
register this issuance of securities under the Securities Act because it did not involve any public
offering of securities.
In
connection with the distribution, Belo and Belo Holdings contributed
to A.H. Belo the stock of
all subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper and related businesses along with certain real estate
and other assets and liabilities
11
Table of Contents
associated with the newspaper and related businesses to A. H.
Belo. The assets and liabilities transferred to A. H. Belo will be recorded at historical cost as
a reorganization of entities under common control in the first quarter of 2008. In consideration
for these capital contributions, A. H. Belo issued to Belo and Belo Holdings a total of 17,603,448
shares of A. H. Belo Series A common stock and 2,848,547 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common
stock. A. H. Belo did not register these issuances of securities under the Securities Act because
they did not involve any public offering of securities.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents selected financial data of the Company for each of the five years
in the period ended December 31, 2007. Certain amounts for the prior years have been reclassified
to conform to the current year presentation. For a more complete understanding of this selected
financial data, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the Combined Financial Statements and the Notes thereto.
As of and for the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
In thousands | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Total net operating revenues |
$ | 738,668 | $ | 817,733 | $ | 822,344 | $ | 779,142 | $ | 763,652 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses(a) |
1,056,100 | 760,376 | 721,251 | 689,460 | 645,378 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
$ | (317,432 | ) | $ | 57,357 | $ | 101,093 | $ | 89,682 | $ | 118,274 | |||||||||
Other income and expense(b) |
(31,067 | ) | (30,310 | ) | (22,913 | ) | (15,648 | ) | (18,065 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
1,487 | (11,868 | ) | (30,361 | ) | (28,745 | ) | (38,458 | ) | |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)(a)(c) |
$ | (347,012 | ) | $ | 15,179 | $ | 47,819 | $ | 45,289 | $ | 61,751 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 619,710 | $ | 994,815 | $ | 981,661 | $ | 963,215 | $ | 968,889 | ||||||||||
Long-term portion of notes payable
to Belo Corp.(d) |
$ | 378,916 | $ | 353,893 | $ | 332,710 | $ | 306,398 | $ | 279,425 |
(a) | Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 include a charge of $344,424 for the impairment of goodwill at The Press-Enterprise and The Providence Journal. | |
(b) | Other income and expense includes $34,834, $31,814, $23,661, $16,510, and $18,009 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively, for interest on notes payable to Belo (see the Combined Financial Statements, Note 7 Long-term Debt). | |
(c) | Net earnings in 2004 included pre-tax charges related to The Dallas Morning News circulation overstatement of $23,500 (see Item 3. Legal Proceedings). | |
(d) | Amounts represent the long-term portion of notes payable to Belo (see the Combined Financial Statements, Note 7 Long-term Debt). |
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, including Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 6. Selected
Financial Data, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks, Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures and the Combined Financial Statements and the Notes thereto. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains a number of
forward-looking statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be
affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in
Item 1A.. Risk Factors.
All references to earnings per share represent diluted earnings per share.
All dollar amounts are in thousands, except per share amounts.
12
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW
A. H. Belo
On October 1, 2007, Belo Corp. (Belo) announced a plan to distribute its newspaper
publishing business into a separate public company, A. H. Belo Corporation (A. H. Belo or the
Company).
The Board of Directors of Belo determined that separating Belos newspaper and other
businesses from Belos television business was in the best interests of Belo and Belos
shareholders. A.H. Belo believes that the companys structure with no initial debt and other
features, will give A. H. Belo the financial and operational flexibility to take advantage of
opportunities in the newspaper sector and meet the changing needs of the media marketplace today
and in the future. In arriving at its decision, the Board considered many factors including the
effect of the Internet and other transformational technologies on consumers, advertisers, and
traditional media such as newspapers and television, the consolidation of media ownership and the
rapid ascent of new media businesses, the prospects for positive changes in media ownership
regulation, and the competitive positions and strengths of Belos newspapers and television
stations and the local markets they serve. Net operating revenues for A. H. Belo were approximately
$738,668, $817,733, and $822,344 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Net (loss) earnings were $(347,012), $15,179 and $47,819 for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On February 8, 2008, the distribution was completed and A. H. Belo and Belo entered into a
separation and distribution agreement under which Belo transferred
substantially all of the assets and
liabilities associated with its newspaper and related businesses to A. H. Belo. The assets and
liabilities transferred to A. H. Belo will be recorded at historical cost as a reorganization of
entities under common control in the first quarter of 2008. The distribution was in the form of a
pro-rata, tax-free dividend to Belos shareholders of 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo common stock for
each share of Belo common stock owned at the close of business on January 25, 2008.
A. H. Belos business consists of three primary daily newspapers, various niche products in
the same or nearby markets, and direct mail and commercial printing businesses. A. H. Belo operates
within the United States and competes against similar and other types of media on a local,
regional, and national basis. A. H. Belo also operates news and information Web sites, participates
in several interactive alliances, and offers a broad range of Internet-based products.
The following table summarizes the net operating revenues for each of A. H. Belos three
daily newspapers for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005:
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
The Dallas Morning News |
$ | 457,418 | $ | 497,887 | $ | 496,776 | ||||||
The Press-Enterprise |
129,675 | 157,185 | 159,628 | |||||||||
The Providence Journal |
151,575 | 162,661 | 165,940 | |||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 738,668 | $ | 817,733 | $ | 822,344 | ||||||
Total revenues decreased approximately 9.7 percent in 2007 when compared to 2006. Total
newspaper advertising revenues were down approximately 10.9 percent in 2007 when compared to 2006.
Advertising revenues associated with the Companys Web sites increased approximately 19.5 percent
in 2007 when compared to 2006. Subject to economic conditions and related advertiser responses to
consumer spending patterns, the Company expects newspaper advertising revenues to decrease in 2008
but not at the levels experienced in 2007. Decreases at The Providence Journal and The Press-Enterprise are expected to be more substantial than at The Dallas Morning News.
The Company is required to assess goodwill impairment annually at the reporting unit level
using the methodology prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS), 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The goodwill impairment test initially consists of the
comparison of the implied fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value. For the Company,
a reporting unit consists of the newspaper operations in each individual market. The Company
performed its annual goodwill impairment testing as of December 31, 2007 and based on the results,
recognized impairment charges to reduce goodwill attributable to The Providence Journal by $242,794
and The Press-Enterprise by $101,630. The impairment charges resulted primarily from a decline in
the estimated fair value of the individual businesses due to lower than estimated market growth
rates versus prior year estimates and projected
13
Table of Contents
increases in newsprint costs. The $344,424
impairment is a non-cash charge to earnings and, as such, will not affect the Companys liquidity,
cash flows from operating activities or debt covenants, or have any impact on future operations.
A. H. Belo intends for the discussion of its financial condition and results of operations
that follows to provide information that will assist in understanding its financial statements, the
changes in certain key items in those statements from period to period, and the primary factors
that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies, and
estimates affect its financial statements.
Basis of Presentation
The combined financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include the accounts of
Belo comprising its newspaper businesses and related assets. Operating expenses in the historical
income statements reflect all of the direct expenses of the business together with allocations of
certain Belo corporate expenses that have been charged to the Company based on use or other
methodologies which the Company believes were appropriate for such expenses. See Combined Financial
Statements, Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. In our opinion, these assumptions
and allocations have been made on a reasonable and appropriate basis under the circumstances.
A. H. Belos and Belos various operating units currently share news and information content at no cost.
The historical financial information included in this Annual Report may not reflect what A. H.
Belos results of operations, financial position, and cash flows would have been had it been a
separate public company during the periods presented or be indicative of what its results of
operations, financial position, and cash flows may be in the future when it is a separate public
company. A. H. Belos historical financial information reflects allocations for services
historically provided by Belo, and the Company expects these allocated costs to be different from
the actual costs A. H. Belo will incur for these services in the future as a separate public
company, including with respect to actual services A. H. Belo expects will be provided by Belo
under a services agreement and other inter-company agreements. In some instances, the costs
incurred for these services as a separate public company may be higher than the share of total Belo
expenses allocated to A. H. Belo historically. In addition, the historical financial information
does not reflect the increased costs associated with being a separate public company, including
expected changes in our cost structure, personnel needs, financing, and operations of our business
as a result of the distribution.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Combined Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | 2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 738,668 | (9.7 | %) | $ | 817,733 | (0.6 | %) | $ | 822,344 | ||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses |
(1,056,100 | ) | 38.9 | % | (760,376 | ) | 5.4 | % | (721,251 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings from operations |
(317,432 | ) | (653.4 | %) | 57,357 | (43.3 | %) | 101,093 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(31,067 | ) | 2.5 | % | (30,310 | ) | 32.3 | % | (22,913 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes |
(348,499 | ) | (1388.5 | %) | 27,047 | (65.4 | %) | 78,180 | ||||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
1,487 | (112.5 | %) | (11,868 | ) | (60.9 | %) | (30,361 | ) | |||||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | (347,012 | ) | (2386.1 | %) | $ | 15,179 | (68.3 | %) | $ | 47,819 | |||||||||
Net Operating Revenues
The table below presents the components of A. H. Belos net operating revenues for the last
three years:
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | 2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 600,335 | (10.9 | %) | $ | 674,140 | (1.9 | %) | $ | 687,140 | ||||||||||
Circulation |
112,635 | (3.1 | %) | 116,265 | 11.0 | % | 104,790 | |||||||||||||
Other |
25,698 | (6.0 | %) | 27,328 | (10.1 | %) | 30,414 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 738,668 | (9.7 | %) | $ | 817,733 | (0.6 | %) | $ | 822,344 |
In 2007, advertising revenues accounted for 81.3 percent of the Companys revenues compared to
82.4 percent in 2006 and 83.6 percent in 2005. In 2007, circulation revenue accounted for 15.2
percent of total of the Companys
14
Table of Contents
revenues compared to 14.2 percent in 2006 and 12.7 percent in
2005. In all three years, commercial printing made up most of the remainder of the Companys
revenues.
The table below presents the components of The Dallas Morning News net operating revenues
for the last three years:
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | 2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 366,516 | (9.8 | %) | $ | 406,514 | (2.8 | %) | $ | 418,066 | ||||||||||
Circulation |
70,244 | (0.3 | %) | 70,445 | 23.9 | % | 56,875 | |||||||||||||
Other |
20,658 | (1.3 | %) | 20,927 | (4.2 | %) | 21,835 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 457,418 | (8.1 | %) | $ | 497,886 | 0.2 | % | $ | 496,776 | ||||||||||
Net operating revenues for The Dallas Morning News decreased by $40,468, or 8.1 percent, in
the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Advertising
revenues decreased by $39,998, or 9.8 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2006. General advertising revenues decreased $17,196, or 27.0 percent, in
the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to
decreases in the financial, telecommunications and travel categories. Classified advertising
revenues decreased $14,739, or 11.2 percent, primarily due to decreases in the real estate,
automotive and employment categories. Retail advertising revenue decreased $6,852, or 7.8 percent,
in the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to
a decrease in the furniture category. Circulation revenue remained flat for the year ended
December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006.
Net operating revenues for The Dallas Morning News increased by $1,110, or 0.2 percent, in the
year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. At The Dallas
Morning News, circulation revenue increased $13,570, or 23.9 percent, in the year ended
December 31, 2006, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to an estimated
increase of $24,555 related to a change in distribution methods from a buy-sell arrangement to a
fee-for-delivery arrangement. In 2005, the Company implemented a change in arrangements with
certain distributors of home delivery and single copy sales from a buy-sell arrangement to a
fee-for-delivery arrangement similar to the Companys other newspapers. Subscription revenues under
buy-sell arrangements with most distributors are recorded based on the net amount received from the
distributor, who then resells newspapers to contractors and subscribers, whereas subscription
revenues under fee-based delivery arrangements with distributors are recorded based on the amount
received from the subscriber. The operating expenses for the delivery fees paid to the distributors
are recorded in distribution costs as they are incurred. Under the previous arrangements, The
Dallas Morning News recorded circulation revenue based on the net payment received from
distributors. Accordingly, this change increased both circulation revenues and distribution costs
related to these distributors. Advertising revenues were not affected by this change. Circulation
revenues attributable to the change in distribution methods are expected to continue at
approximately the current level. The Dallas Morning News has experienced a decrease in circulation
over the past few years, some of which resulted from decisions to reduce the distribution area of
the newspaper to approximately a 100-mile radius from the center of Dallas. Efforts to improve the
circulation involved a promotional campaign that included discounts of approximately $7,795 for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The decreases in circulation revenue due to the discounts partially
offset the increases in circulation revenue due to the change in distribution methods. The Dallas
Morning News is moving to concentrate its circulation efforts on its core readership. The Dallas
Morning News expects circulation and circulation revenue to fluctuate during this process. The
increases in circulation revenue were partially offset by decreases in advertising revenue. Total
advertising revenues decreased $11,552, or 2.8 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2006, when
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. General advertising revenues decreased $2,273, or 3.4
percent, in the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005,
primarily due to decreases in the automotive and telecommunications categories. Retail advertising
revenue decreased $6,622, or 7.0 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the department stores, furniture, and
general retail categories. Classified advertising revenue, including Internet revenue, decreased
$7,681, or 5.5 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the automotive and real estate categories,
partially offset by an increase in the employment category.
15
Table of Contents
The following table presents the components of The Providence Journal net operating revenues
for the last three years:
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | 2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 125,874 | (6.9 | %) | $ | 135,189 | (1.0 | %) | $ | 136,503 | ||||||||||
Circulation |
25,072 | (5.7 | %) | 26,601 | (6.6 | %) | 28,492 | |||||||||||||
Other |
629 | (27.8 | %) | 871 | (7.8 | %) | 945 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 151,575 | (6.8 | %) | $ | 162,661 | (2.0 | %) | $ | 165,940 | ||||||||||
Net operating revenues for The Providence Journal decreased by $11,086, or 6.8 percent, in the
year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Advertising revenues
decreased $9,315, or 6.9 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2006. Classified advertising revenue decreased $4,027, or 8.1 percent, in the year
ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to decreases
in the automotive, employment and real estate categories. Retail advertising revenues decreased
$3,769, or 8.6 percent, due to decreases in the automotive, building and home improvement,
furniture and home accessories, and gaming categories for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. General advertising revenues decreased $1,299, or
44.2 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006,
primarily due to decreases in the automotive and travel and transportation categories. Circulation
revenue declined $1,529, or 5.7 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to lower overall circulation.
Net operating revenues for The Providence Journal decreased $3,279, or 2.0 percent, in the
year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. Advertising revenues
were relatively flat for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31,
2005. Retail advertising revenues decreased $2,821, or 6.0 percent, due to decreases in the
automotive, furniture and home accessories, and telecommunications categories for the year ended
December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. General advertising revenues
decreased $1,422, or 32.6 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the automotive, travel, and pharmaceutical
categories. These decreases in retail and general advertising revenues were partially offset by an
increase in classified advertising revenue. Classified advertising revenue increased $1,170, or 2.4
percent, in the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005,
primarily due to increases in the real estate and other categories partially offset by decreases in
the employment and automotive categories. Circulation revenue declined $1,891, or 6.6 percent, in
the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to
lower overall circulation and an increase in discounts related to promotional campaigns.
The table below presents the components of The Press-Enterprise net operating revenues for the
last three years:
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | 2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 107,945 | (18.5 | %) | $ | 132,438 | (0.1 | %) | $ | 132,571 | ||||||||||
Circulation |
17,319 | (9.9 | %) | 19,218 | (1.1 | %) | 19,423 | |||||||||||||
Other |
4,411 | (20.2 | %) | 5,529 | (27.6 | %) | 7,634 | |||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
$ | 129,675 | (17.5 | %) | $ | 157,185 | (1.5 | %) | $ | 159,628 | ||||||||||
Net operating revenues for The Press-Enterprise decreased $27,510, or 17.5 percent, in the
year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Total advertising
revenues decreased $24,493, or 18.5 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2006. Classified advertising revenues decreased $18,122, or 28.8 percent,
primarily due to decreases in the employment, real estate and automotive categories. Retail
advertising revenues decreased $2,638, or 13.3 percent, primarily due to decreases in the
department store, home improvement, home furnishings, grocery, and discount categories. Part-run
advertising decreased $1,589, or 12.8 percent, primarily due to decreases in the furniture and home
improvement categories. General advertising revenues decreased $1,289, or 11.5 percent, in the
year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to
decreases in the financial and automotive categories. Circulation revenue at The Press-Enterprise
decreased $1,899, or 9.9 percent, when comparing the year ended December 31, 2007 to
16
Table of Contents
the year ended December 31, 2006. Commercial printing and other revenue at The Press-Enterprise declined $1,118,
or 20.2 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31,
2006.
Net operating revenues for The Press-Enterprise decreased $2,443, or 1.5 percent, in the year
ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. Total advertising
revenues were relatively flat in the year ended December 31, 2006, compared with the year ended
December 31, 2005. Classified advertising revenues, including Internet revenues, increased $1,902,
or 3.1 percent, primarily due to an increase in the real estate category. Preprints revenues
increased $1,064, or 5.3 percent, primarily due to increases in the drug store and home furnishings
categories. Offsetting these increases were decreases in retail and general advertising revenues
and commercial printing revenue. Retail advertising revenues decreased $1,225, or 5.8 percent,
primarily due to decreases in the department store and grocery categories. General advertising
revenues decreased $2,129, or 16.0 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2006, when compared with
the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to decreases in the telecommunications and
automotive categories. Circulation revenue at The Press-Enterprise
decreased $205, or 1.1 percent.
Commercial printing and other revenue at The Press-Enterprise declined $2,105, or 27.6 percent, for
the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to the year ended December 31, 2005.
Operating Costs and Expenses
The Companys operating costs and expenses increased $295,724, or 38.9 percent, in the year
ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the prior year period
primarily due to a non-cash charge for goodwill impairment, decreases in
salaries, wages and employee benefits and a decrease in newsprint, ink and other supplies.
Salaries, wages and employee benefits decreased $25,317, or 7.8 percent, for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to the voluntary
severance program for newsroom employees at The Dallas Morning News initiated in the third quarter
2006 which reduced headcount. In addition to the voluntary severance program, the Company
recognized a reduction in estimated pension expense of approximately $8,488 primarily due to the
Companys curtailment of its defined benefit pension plan effective March 31, 2007 and an increase
in the discount rate applied to future pension obligations. These decreases were partially offset
by an increase in workers compensation expense. In the fourth quarter 2007, the Company recorded a non-cash charge for goodwill impairment of
$344,424, of which $242,794 related to The Providence Journal and $101,630 related to The
Press-Enterprise based on assessments performed for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company
is required to test goodwill at least annually for impairment. See
Combined Financial Statements, Note 3 Goodwill and Intangible Assets for more information.
Newsprint, ink and other supplies decreased $30,274, or 22.8 percent, for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, with decreases in newsprint
consumption and average cost per metric ton. During 2007, The Companys publishing operations
consumed approximately 136,546 metric tons of newsprint at an average cost of $586 per metric ton.
Consumption of newsprint in the previous year was approximately 166,756 metric tons at an average
cost per metric ton of $631.
The Companys operating costs and expenses increased $39,125, or 5.4 percent, in the year
ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the prior year period primarily due to increases in
salaries, wages, and employee benefits and other production, distribution, and operating costs
partially offset by a decrease in newsprint, ink, and other supplies. Salaries, wages, and employee
benefits increased $16,257, or 5.3 percent, primarily due to severance costs, incremental
share-based compensation expenses, and increased pension expense due to an announced pension
curtailment. These increases were partially offset by decreases totaling $7,123 in sales
commissions, estimated self-insured medical expenses, and workers compensation insurance costs.
Other production, distribution, and operating costs increased primarily due to increased
distribution costs of $16,756 and outside services costs of $21,186. The increase in distribution
costs is due to approximately $19,550 in costs related to the change in distribution methods at The
Dallas Morning News. A. H. Belo expects this increased level of distribution costs at The Dallas
Morning News to continue. Outside services increased primarily due to increased consulting expenses
primarily related to readership, sales and technology initiatives. Newsprint, ink, and other
supplies decreased $9,126, or 6.4 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2005, due to the Companys strategic decisions to limit third-party
circulation and to reduce the distribution area of The Dallas Morning News and lower advertising
volumes. The 17.4 percent decrease in consumption was partially offset by an increase in the
average cost per metric ton of newsprint of 12.4 percent.
Interest
expense increased $3,020, or 9.5 percent, in 2007, compared to
an increase of $8,153, or 34.5
percent, in 2006. This is primarily due to year-over-year increases in the balances on notes
payable to Belo. Certain subsidiaries had entered into notes payable arrangements with Belo. The
notes accrued interest at prime plus one percent and had various
17
Table of Contents
payments terms. In conjunction
with the distribution, Belo contributed to the capital of A. H. Belo all inter-company
indebtedness owed by A. H. Belo to Belo or assigned the notes to A. H. Belo on or prior to the
Distribution Date. The contribution or assignment effectively extinguished all liabilities of A. H.
Belo to Belo under such notes.
Other income, net increased $2,263, or 150.5 percent in 2007, when compared to 2006. This is
primarily due to a gain recognized on the disposal of fixed assets of $2,250. Other income, net
increased $756, or 101.1 percent, in 2006, compared to 2005 primarily due to the forgiveness of a
note payable from a subsidiary to Belo. The forgiveness was related to the final wind down of the
Companys trade show business.
Income taxes decreased
$13,355 or 112.5 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to lower taxable income. Income taxes
decreased $18,493, or 60.9 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared with the year
ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to lower taxable income and adjustments related to the
implementation of the State of Texas margin tax. In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted
legislation replacing its franchise tax with a new margin tax. Despite an effective date of
January 1, 2008, the enactment of the Tax Reform Bill represents a change in tax law and SFAS 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes requires that effects of the change must be reflected in the
financial statements in the quarter in which the new tax is enacted. The effective tax rate for
2007, 2006, and 2005 was (0.4) percent, 43.9 percent, and 38.8 percent, respectively. The effective
tax rate is higher than the statutory tax rate primarily due to state income taxes.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
A. H. Belos financial statements are based on the selection and application of accounting
policies that require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The Company
believes that the following are some of the more critical accounting policies currently affecting
A. H. Belos financial position and results of operations. See the Combined Financial Statements,
Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for additional information concerning
significant accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition. Newspaper advertising revenue is recorded, net of agency commissions,
when the advertisements are published in the newspaper. Advertising revenues for Web sites are
recorded, net of agency fees, ratably over the period of time the advertisement is placed on Web
sites. Proceeds from subscriptions are deferred and are included in revenue on a pro-rata basis
over the term of the subscriptions. Subscription revenues under buy-sell arrangements with
distributors are recorded based on the net amount received from the distributor, whereas
subscription revenues under fee-based delivery arrangements with distributors are recorded based on
the amount received from the subscriber. Commercial printing revenue is recorded when the product
is shipped.
Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. In assessing the
recoverability of the Companys property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, the
Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine
the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in
the future, the Company may be required to record additional impairment charges for these assets.
The Companys intangible assets and goodwill result from its significant business
acquisitions, which occurred prior to 1998. In connection with these acquisitions, the Company
obtained appraisals of the significant assets purchased. The excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. At December 31, 2007, A. H. Belo had
net investments of $307,788 in property, plant and equipment, $119,667 in goodwill, and $40,426 in
intangible assets, which consist of subscriber lists.
Prior to January 1, 2002, all of the acquired intangible assets were classified together as
goodwill and intangible assets in the Companys combined financial statements and were amortized
over a composite life of 40 years. On January 1, 2002, upon adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS), 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company ceased
amortization of its goodwill.
Goodwill is tested at least annually by reporting unit for impairment. For the Company, a
reporting unit consists of the newspaper operations in each individual market. As a result of the
assessment as of December 31, 2007, the Company incurred a non-cash charge to goodwill of
approximately $344,424 in the fourth quarter of 2007 related to goodwill impairment at two of the
Companys reporting units: The Providence Journal and The Press-Enterprise. There is no tax effect
related to the impairment charge, and this non-cash charge will not affect the Companys liquidity,
cash flows from operating activities, debt covenants, or have any effect on future operations.
Based on the assessments performed as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not record any
impairment charges related to goodwill or intangible assets.
18
Table of Contents
The Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant and equipment for impairment
whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by comparison of the carrying
amount to the future net cash flows the property and equipment is expected to generate. Based on
assessments performed during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not
record any impairment losses related to property, plant, and equipment.
Contingencies. A. H. Belo is involved in certain claims and litigation related to its
operations. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these claims and
litigation would not have a material adverse effect on A. H. Belos combined financial position,
liquidity, or results of operations. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any
adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A
determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after
careful analysis of each individual matter. The required reserves may change in the future due to
new developments in each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in
dealing with these matters.
Share-Based Compensation. The Company records the compensation expense related to its stock
options according to SFAS 123R, as adopted on January 1, 2006. The Company records the compensation
expense related to its options using the fair value as of the date of grant as calculated using the
Black-Scholes-Merton method. The Company records the compensation expense related to its restricted
stock units using the fair value as of the date of grant.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS 141R
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and
measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statement to evaluate the nature and financial effects of
the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, any business combinations the Company engages in
will be recorded and disclosed following existing accounting principles until January 1, 2009. The
Company expects SFAS No. 141R will have an impact on our combined financial statements when
effective, but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms
and size of the acquisitions, if any, that are consummated after the effective date.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities. This statement permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities
with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is evaluating the effects of this new standard, but currently believes that adoption
will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 establishes,
among other items, a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing
a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value,
and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. SFAS 157 will be effective for financial
assets and liabilities in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and will be effective for non-financial assets and liabilities in financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the effect of the
adoption of this standard.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operations was $62,147, $49,497 and $91,206 in the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The changes in cash flows from operations are
caused primarily by changes in net earnings (loss) and normal changes in working capital
requirements. The Company used net cash provided by operations to fund capital expenditures and to
invest in a joint venture.
Investing Cash Flows
Net cash flows used for investing activities were $43,002, $65,315 and $61,395 in the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. These cash flows are primarily attributable
to capital expenditures and an investment in a joint venture.
19
Table of Contents
Capital Expenditures
Total capital expenditures were $41,117, $68,356 and $52,860 in 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively. These were primarily for the Companys facilities and equipment and corporate-driven
technology initiatives. The Company expects to finance future capital expenditures, which are
expected to total approximately $25,000 in 2008, using cash generated from operations and, when
necessary, borrowings under the bank credit agreement.
In the first quarter 2007, the Company took possession of a new distribution and collating
facility for The Dallas Morning News in southern Dallas (the South Plant). The total cost of the
South Plant land, improvements, buildings and equipment is projected to be approximately $50,000.
Of the total estimated costs, approximately $48,173 has been incurred as of December 31, 2007.
In the first quarter 2007, The Press-Enterprise moved into its new 150,000 square foot,
five-story office building to centralize all news, editorial, advertising, sales and marketing,
technology, production support, and administrative functions. The total cost of the project is
projected to be approximately $40,000. Of the total estimated costs, approximately $35,522 has been
incurred as of December 31, 2007.
Financing Cash Flows
Net cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities were $(22,792), $14,899 and
$(27,343) in the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. These cash flows are
primarily attributable to dividends and distributions paid to Belo offset by borrowings from Belo
pursuant to notes payable. The notes accrue interest at prime plus one percent and have various
payment terms. In conjunction with the distribution transaction, Belo contributed to the capital of
A. H. Belo all inter-company indebtedness owed by A. H. Belo to Belo or assigned the notes to A. H.
Belo.
The Company entered into a Credit Agreement dated as of February 4, 2008 with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and
certain other lenders party thereto (the Credit Agreement) effective as of the Distribution Date.
The Credit Agreement has a five-year term that expires in February 2013. The facility provided for
under the Credit Agreement may be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes,
including letters of credit.
The Credit Agreement consists of a $100 million senior unsecured five-year revolving credit
facility. Revolving credit borrowings under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at a variable
interest rate based on either LIBOR or a base rate, in either case plus an applicable margin that
varies depending upon the Companys leverage ratio.
The Credit Agreement contains a number of restrictions on the Companys business, including,
but not limited to, restrictions on the Companys (and certain of its subsidiaries) ability to
incur indebtedness; grant liens on assets; make certain restricted payments; merge, consolidate, or
sell assets; engage in transactions with affiliates; enter into restrictive agreements; enter
into sale-leaseback transactions; and to make certain investments. In addition, the Company is subject
to a leverage ratio covenant and a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant. The Credit Agreement also
contains affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross-default to certain other
debt. Failure to comply with these covenants, or the occurrence of an event of default, could
result in acceleration of the Companys debt and other financial obligations under the Credit
Agreement.
The Credit Agreement requires the Companys material subsidiaries to guarantee the obligations
of the Company under the Credit Agreement.
Contractual Obligations
The table below summarizes the following commitments of the Company as of December 31, 2007.
See also Combined Financial Statements, Note 9 Commitments.
Nature of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitment | Total | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures and licenses |
$ | 6,568 | $ | 5,936 | $ | 632 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable operating leases |
11,895 | 5,081 | 3,459 | 1,957 | 876 | 514 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 18,463 | $ | 11,017 | $ | 4,091 | $ | 1,957 | $ | 876 | $ | 514 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Other
A. H. Belo has various options available to meet its 2008 capital and operating commitments,
including cash on hand, short term investments, a five year revolving credit facility and
internally generated funds. A. H. Belo believes its current financial condition and credit
relationships are adequate to fund both its current obligations as well as near-term growth.
21
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma financial statements of the Company presented below consist of the unaudited pro
forma balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 and the unaudited pro forma statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The unaudited pro forma financial statements presented below
should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and the combined financial statements, and the notes related thereto,
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The unaudited pro forma financial statements
have been prepared giving effect to the elimination of the notes payable to Belo and the
distribution as if these transactions occurred as of December 31, 2007, for the unaudited pro forma
balance sheet, and as of January 1, 2007, for the unaudited pro forma statement of operations.
On October 1, 2007, Belo announced a plan to distribute its newspaper publishing business to
its shareholders to create a separate public company. On October 1, 2007, Belo also formed a new,
wholly-owned subsidiary, A. H. Belo, to serve as the holding company for its newspaper business and
related businesses.
On the Distribution Date, Belo contributed all of its subsidiaries engaged in newspaper business
and related assets and liabilities to A. H. Belo. The assets and liabilities transferred to A. H.
Belo were recorded at historical cost as a reorganization of entities under common control in
the first quarter of 2008.
On the Distribution Date, Belo settled or assigned intercompany indebtedness between and among Belo
and its subsidiaries, including Belos subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper business and related
assets. Belo settled accounts through contributions of such indebtedness to the capital of the
debtor subsidiaries, distributions by creditor subsidiaries, and other non-cash transfers, or
assigned such notes to A. H. Belo. As of the effective time of the distribution, Belo had
contributed to the capital of A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries the net intercompany indebtedness
owed to Belo by A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries and A. H. Belo assumed the indebtedness owed by
Belo to the A. H. Belo subsidiaries.
On the Distribution Date, the distribution was completed in the form of a pro-rata dividend to
Belos shareholders shares of 0.20 A. H. Belo Series A common stock for every share of Belo Series
A common stock, and 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock for every share of Belo Series
B common stock owned as of the close of business on January 25, 2008.
On the Distribution Date, as a consequence of the distribution, A. H. Belo became a separate public
company. Belo has no further ownership interest in A. H. Belo or in any newspaper or related
businesses, and A. H. Belo has no ownership interest in Belo or in any television station or
related businesses. A. H. Belos relationship with Belo is now governed by a separation and
distribution agreement and several ancillary agreements with Belo governing various relationships between A. H. Belo and Belo. A. H. Belo and Belo also co-own certain downtown
Dallas, Texas, real-estate used in their respective businesses.
Belos contributions to A. H. Belos equity will also be adjusted for transfers of certain
additional assets and liabilities as of the distribution date.
However, the effect of such
adjustments is not expected to be material to the pro forma financial position of A. H. Belo as of
December 31, 2007
The unaudited pro forma balance sheet and unaudited pro forma statements of operations
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been derived from our financial statements
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and do not purport to represent what our financial
position and results of operations actually would have been had the distribution and related
transactions occurred on the dates indicated or to project our financial performance for any future
period.
22
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2007
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2007
A. H. Belo | A. H. Belo | |||||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share | Businesses | Pro Forma | Corporation | |||||||||
amounts) | Historical | Adjustments | Pro Forma | |||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments |
$ | 6,874 | $ | | $ | 6,874 | ||||||
Accounts receivablenet |
90,792 | | 90,792 | |||||||||
Inventories |
11,407 | | 11,407 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,744 | | 4,744 | |||||||||
Prepaids and other current assets |
8,202 | | 8,202 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
122,019 | | 122,019 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
307,788 | | 307,788 | |||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
40,426 | | 40,426 | |||||||||
Goodwill, net |
119,667 | | 119,667 | |||||||||
Other assets |
29,810 | | 29,810 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 619,710 | $ | | $ | 619,710 | ||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 25,384 | $ | | $ | 25,384 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
31,161 | | 31,161 | |||||||||
Accrued interest on notes payable to Belo Corp. |
35,148 | (35,148 | )(a) | | ||||||||
Other accrued expenses |
3,822 | | 3,822 | |||||||||
Advance subscription payments |
24,495 | | 24,495 | |||||||||
Current portion of notes payable to Belo Corp. |
392 | (392 | )(a) | | ||||||||
Total current liabilities |
120,402 | (35,540 | ) | 84,862 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19,189 | | 19,189 | |||||||||
Notes payable to Belo Corp. |
378,916 | (378,916 | )(a) | | ||||||||
Other liabilities |
14,263 | | 14,263 | |||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||||||
Belo Corp.s equity |
86,940 | 414,456 | (a) | | ||||||||
(501,584 | )(b) | |||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 2,000,000
shares; none issued |
| | | |||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 125,000,000 shares: |
||||||||||||
Series A: Issued 17,603,244 shares at December 31, 2007 |
| 176 | (b) | 176 | ||||||||
Series B: Issued 2,848,628 shares at December 31, 2007 |
| 28 | (b) | 28 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 501,380 | (b) | 501,380 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
86,940 | 414,456 | 501,396 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 619,710 | $ | | $ | 619,710 | ||||||
See notes to unaudited pro forma financial statements
23
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
A. H. Belo | A. H. Belo | ||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per | Businesses | Pro Forma | Corporation | ||||||||||
share amounts) | Historical | Adjustment | Pro Forma | ||||||||||
Net operating revenues: |
|||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 600,335 | $ | | $ | 600,335 | |||||||
Circulation |
112,635 | | 112,635 | ||||||||||
Other |
25,698 | | 25,698 | ||||||||||
Total net operating revenues |
738,668 | | 738,668 | ||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses(e) |
|||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
297,630 | | 297,630 | ||||||||||
Other production, distribution and operating costs |
259,231 | | 259,231 | ||||||||||
Newsprint, ink and other supplies |
102,501 | | 102,501 | ||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
344,424 | 344,424 | |||||||||||
Depreciation |
45,815 | | 45,815 | ||||||||||
Amortization |
6,499 | | 6,499 | ||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
1,056,100 | | 1,056,100 | ||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(317,432 | ) | | (317,432 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expense |
|||||||||||||
Interest expense on notes payable to Belo Corp. |
(34,834 | ) | 34,834 | (c) | | ||||||||
Other income, net |
3,767 | | 3,767 | ||||||||||
Total other income and expense |
(31,067 | ) | 34,834 | 3,767 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) |
|||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(348,499 | ) | 34,834 | (313,665 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(1,487 | ) | 12,711 | (d) | 11,224 | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (347,012 | ) | $ | 22,123 | $ | (324,889 | ) | |||||
Pro forma
basic and diluted loss per share(f) |
$ | (15.89 | ) | ||||||||||
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding(f) |
20,449 | ||||||||||||
See notes to unaudited pro forma financial statements.
24
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For further information regarding the historical financial statements of A. H. Belo, refer to
the combined financial statements and the notes related thereto included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The unaudited pro forma balance sheet includes the following adjustments as of December 31,
2007:
(a) | The elimination of the notes payable to Belo and its subsidiaries and related accrued interest as a result of the contribution of such notes to the capital of A. H. Belo or assignment of the notes to A. H. Belo; and | ||
(b) | The issuance of 17,603,244 shares of common stock of A. H. Belo Series A common stock, par value $.01, and 2,848,628 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock, par value $.01, at a distribution ratio of 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo common stock for each corresponding share of Belo common stock outstanding. |
The accompanying pro forma statements of operations reflect the following pro forma
adjustments:
(c) | The elimination of historical interest expense on the notes due to Belo as a result of the contribution of such notes to the capital of A. H. Belo or assignment to A. H. Belo of such notes; | ||
(d) | The estimated income tax effect of entry (d) above is at the applicable statutory rates. The effective income tax rate of 36.5 percent for the year ended December 31, 2007 differs from the federal statutory rate of 35 percent due primarily to the effect of state income taxes. The year ended December 31, 2007 includes a reduction of income tax expense of $1,896 for the effect of the enactment of the Texas margin tax. See the Combined Financial Statements, Note 8Income Taxes. | ||
(e) | The pro forma statements of operations do not include adjustments to costs and expenses resulting from the inter-company agreements. A. H. Belo expects that the effect of these agreements on A. H. Belos future results would not be material. | ||
(f) | Earnings per share information has been computed as if the shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding based on the weighted average shares of Belo common stock outstanding and the distribution ratio. |
25
Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
A. H. Belo has exposure to changes in the price of newsprint. The average price of newsprint
in 2008 is expected to increase, although specific pricing increases and the timing of price
variations cannot be predicted. A. H. Belo believes the newsprint environment for 2008, giving
consideration to both cost and supply, to be manageable through existing relationships and sources.
A. H. Belo entered into the Credit Agreement in February 2008. Revolving credit borrowings
under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate. A change in future interest
rates could affect the rate and amount of interest paid by A. H. Belo on any future borrowings
under the Credit Agreement and could result in a change in A. H. Belos pretax earnings and cash
flows.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Combined Financial Statements, together with the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm, are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Financial statement
schedules have been omitted because the required information is contained in the Combined Financial
Statements or related Notes, or because such information is not applicable.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, the
President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
were effective such that information relating to the Company
(including its combined subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in the
Companys SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated
and communicated to the Companys management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
This Annual Report does not include a report of managements assessment regarding internal
control over financial reporting or an attestation report of our registered independent public
accounting firm due to a transition period established by the rules of the SEC for newly public
companies. Beginning with our annual report for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require us to include a report by our management on our
internal controls over financial reporting. This report must contain an assessment by management of
the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal
year and a statement as to whether or not our internal controls are effective. Our annual report
for fiscal year ending 2008 must also contain
a statement that our independent auditors have issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal controls.
In connection with our spin-off from Belo on February 8, 2008, responsibility for all
corporate accounting, finance and internal audit functions of our Company was transferred from
personnel at Belo to our corporate personnel. The Company has created our own functions, or engaged
third parties to provide these functions, to replace those previously performed by Belo. These
changes, although significant, are not likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
26
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
The persons listed below are executive officers and directors of A. H. Belo as of February 8,
2008. Our bylaws provide that the Board of Directors be divided into three classes, approximately
equal in number, with staggered terms of three years so that the term of one class expires at each
annual meeting. The bylaws further provide that a director will retire on the date of the next
annual meeting of shareholders following his or her 68th birthday. Each of the persons identified
below as a member of the Board of Directors will serve until the annual meeting set forth below.
All A. H. Belo directors, other than Robert Decherd and Dealey Herndon, meet the NYSE listing standards
for independence.
Name | Principal Positions and Directorships | |
Robert W. Decherd
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer(1)(2)(5) | |
James M. Moroney III
|
Executive Vice President and Publisher and Chief Executive Officer, The Dallas Morning News (6) | |
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr.
|
Executive Vice President and Secretary (7) | |
Alison K. Engel
|
Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (8) | |
Daniel J. Blizzard
|
Senior Vice President(9) | |
Louis E. Caldera
|
Director(1)(3)(10) | |
Douglas G. Carlston
|
Director(1)(4)(11) | |
Dealey D. Herndon
|
Director(1)(4)(12) | |
Laurence E. Hirsch
|
Director(1)(3)(13) | |
J. McDonald Williams
|
Director(1)(2)(14) |
(1) | Member of the Board of Directors. | |
(2) | Class III director, current term expires at the 2011 annual meeting. | |
(3) | Class II director, current terms expires at the 2010 annual meeting. | |
(4) | Class I director, current term expires at the 2009 annual meeting. | |
(5) | Robert W. Decherd, age 56, served as A. H. Belos chairman, president, and Chief Executive Officer since December 2007 and has served as non-executive chairman of Belo Corp., the former parent company of A. H. Belo., since February 2008. During his 35-year career with Belo Corp., he held several executive positions, including: chairman and chief executive officer from January 1987 through January 2008; president from January 1985 through December 1986 and again from January 1994 through February 2007; and chief operating officer from January 1984 through December 1986. Robert has been a member of the board of directors of Kimberly-Clark Corporation since 1996, and served as that companys lead director from 2004-2008. He serves on the Advisory Council for Harvard Universitys Center for Ethics, and the Board of Visitors of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. From 2002 to March 2006, he served as a member of the FCCs Media Security and Reliability Council, which is part of President Bushs Homeland Security initiative. | |
(6) | James M. Moroney, age 51, has served as executive vice president of A. H. Belo since December 2007 and continues to serve as publisher and Chief Executive Officer of The Dallas Morning News, a position he has held since June 2001. Previously, Jim held several executive positions with Belo Corp., the former parent company of A. H. Belo, including president of Belo Interactive, Inc. from its formation in May 1999 until June 2001, and executive vice president of Belo Corp. from July 1998 through December 1999, with responsibilities for finance, treasury, and investor relations. Jim presently serves on the boards of the Newspaper Association of America, Cistercian Preparatory School in Dallas and the State Fair of Texas. Jim joined A. H. Belo in December 2007. | |
(7) | Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr., age 42, has served as executive vice president and secretary of the Company since December 2007, and has responsibility for Belo Interactive Media, Business Development and Belo Technologies. Skip was executive vice president of Belo Corp., the former parent corporation of the Company, from March 2007 through January 2008, overseeing its Belo Interactive Media and business development activities. During his career with Belo Corp., Skip held several executive positions, including, also served executive vice president/Media Operations from February 2006 through February 2007, and served as senior vice president from February 2000 through January 2006, which included responsibility for corporate communications from February |
27
Table of Contents
2000 through January 2002, and operating responsibility for The Press-Enterprise from January 2000 to January 2006 and for Belo Corp.s Arizona broadcast operations from January 2002 to January 2006. Skip joined A. H. Belo in December 2007. | ||
(8) | Alison K. Engel, age 37, has been senior vice president/Chief Financial Officer and treasurer of the Company since December 2007. From 2003 through January 2008, Ali held various senior positions with Belo Corp., the former parent corporation of the Company, serving as its vice president/Corporate Controller from January 2006 through January 2008 and as its director/accounting operations and corporate controller from February 2005 to December 2005. From 2000 to 2003, Ali was the assistant controller for EXE Technologies, Inc. Ali is a certified public accountant and has more than 13 years of financial management experience at diversified multi-unit business organizations and PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ali joined A. H. Belo in December 2007. | |
(9) | Daniel J. Blizzard, age 49, serves as senior vice president of the Company, a position he has held since December 2007. He was vice president/Operations of Belo Corp., the former parent corporation of the Company, from January 2001 through January 2008 and also served as executive vice president/Real Estate for its subsidiary, Belo Investment Corporation, from January 2007 through January 2008. Prior, Dan served as director/procurement for The Dallas Morning News from May 1999 until 2001. He is chairman of the board of Downtown Dallas and is a board member of the City Center TIF District, Downtown Connection TIF District, and the Downtown Dallas Development Authority. Dan joined A. H. Belo in December 2007. | |
(10) | Louis E. Caldera, age 52 served as president of the University of New Mexico from August 2003 to February 2006, and is currently a tenured member of the University of New Mexico Law School faculty. He served as vice chancellor for university advancement at The California State University from June 2001 to June 2003. Louis was Secretary of the Army in the Clinton Administration from July 1998 until January 2001. He previously served as managing director and chief operating officer for the Corporation for National and Community Service, a federal grant-making agency, from September 1997 to June 1998. Louis serves on the boards of directors of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. and Southwest Airlines Co. and previously served on the board of directors of Belo Corp. from July 2001 through January 2008. | |
(11) | Douglas G. Carlston, age 60, has served as chairman of the board of Public Radio International since June 2003, having been a member of that board since March 1997. He also serves as chief executive officer of Tawala Systems, an Internet technology company he co-founded in 2005. Previously, in 1980, Doug co-founded Brøderbund Software, one of the worlds leading publishers of productivity and educational software, and served as chief executive officer from 1981 until 1996 and as chairman of the board from 1981 until 1998. Doug currently serves on the boards of the Albanian American Enterprise Fund, and the Long Now Foundation. He is a member of the Committee on University Resources of Harvard University and the Board of Advisors of Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. Doug previously served on the board of directors of Belo Corp. from July 2007 through January 2008. | |
(12) | Dealey D. Herndon, age 61, is a project management consultant, with a specialty in project and construction management of large historic preservation projects. From 1995 until the business was sold in 2006, she was president and majority owner of Herndon, Stauch & Associates, an Austin-based firm that managed commercial, public, and non-profit construction projects. She remains associated with the firm, now HS&A. From January to October 2001, she served as Governor Rick Perrys Director of Appointments. From 1991 to 1995, she was executive director of the State Preservation Board of the State of Texas and managed the comprehensive Texas Capitol Preservation and Extension Project through its completion. Dealey is a director of Belo Corp., a trustee emeritus of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and a member of the University of Texas at Austin Development Board. In 2007, she was a member of the Brackenridge Tract Task Force for the University of Texas System. | |
(13) | Laurence E. Hirsch, age 62, is the chairman of Eagle Materials Inc., a construction products company, a position he has held since July 1999. He is also the chairman of Highlander Partners, L.P., a private equity firm. Larry is the former chairman and chief executive officer of Centex Corporation, one of the nations largest homebuilders. He was chief executive officer of Centex from July 1988 through March 2004 and chairman of the board from July 1991 through March 2004. Larry serves as chairman of the Center for European Policy Analysis in Washington, D.C.. Larry served as a director of Belo Corp., the former parent company of A. H. Belo, from August 1999 through January 2008. |
28
Table of Contents
(14) | J. McDonald Williams, age 66, is the former chief executive officer and chairman of Trammell Crow Company, a real estate services firm. He served as chief executive officer from 1977 through July 1994, as chairman of the board from August 1994 to May 2002, and as chairman emeritus from May 2002 until December 2006 when Trammell Crow Company merged with CB Richard Ellis. Don serves on the boards of directors of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, Abilene Christian University, the Hoblitzelle Foundation, Southern Methodist Universitys Perkins School of Theology, and the Foundation for Community Empowerment. He also serves on the Deans Council of Harvard Universitys John F. Kennedy School of Government. From April 1985 through January 2008, Don served as a director of Belo Corp., the former parent company of A. H. Belo, and served as its lead director from March 2004 through February 2008. | |
Robert Decherd and Dealey Herndon are brother and sister. Jim Moroney is their second cousin. |
Corporate Governance
Introduction
A.
H. Belos Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance
guidelines, approved a code
of business conduct and ethics applicable to A. H. Belo directors, officers, and employees, and
adopted a charter for each Board committee. Our Board will periodically review and evaluate A. H.
Belos corporate governance policies and practices in light of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, SEC
regulations implementing this legislation, corporate governance listing standards adopted by the
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and evolving best practices. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee reviews A. H. Belos corporate governance guidelines and Board committee
charters annually and recommends changes to the board as appropriate. A. H. Belos corporate
governance documents are posted on our Web site at www.ahbelo.com under Investor Relations and
are available in print, without charge, upon written or oral request to A. H. Belo Corporation,
Attn: Donald F. Cass, Jr., Secretary, P.O. Box 224866, Dallas, TX 75222-4866.
Director Independence
To assist it in making determinations of a directors independence, the Board has adopted
independence standards, which are set forth in A. H. Belos corporate governance guidelines, the
applicable portion of which is filed with this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1. These standards
incorporate the director independence criteria included in the NYSE listing standards, as well as
additional, more stringent criteria established by the Board. The Board has determined that the
following directors are independent under these standards: Louis Caldera, Doug Carlston, Larry
Hirsch, and Don Williams. Each of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committees is composed entirely of independent directors. In accordance with SEC requirements,
NYSE listing standards and the independence standards set forth in A. H. Belos corporate
governance guidelines, all members of the Audit Committee meet additional independence standards
applicable to audit committee members.
Meetings of the Board
The Board held one meeting in 2007 and took action by unanimous written consent twice. Each
incumbent director attended 100 percent of the meetings held by the Board and of the meetings held
by all committees on which he or she served. Directors are expected to attend annual meetings of
shareholders; the first Annual Meeting of Shareholders is expected to be held in May 2009.
Committees of the Board
A. H. Belos Board of Directors has established several standing committees to assist in the
discharge of its responsibilities. These committees are an audit committee, a compensation
committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee. Due to the size of the Board, each
independent director will serve on each of the three standing committees. Effective December 2007,
each of the Boards standing committees consists of Louis Caldera, Doug Carlston, Larry Hirsch, and
Don Williams, each of whom is an independent director under the NYSE listing standards and under
the independence standards set forth in A. H. Belos corporate governance guidelines.
Dealey Herndon and Robert Decherd will not serve on any of these standing committees. The Board of
Directors may also establish other committees as it deems appropriate, in accordance with
applicable Delaware law, NYSE regulation, the corporate governance guidelines, and the bylaws.
29
Table of Contents
Audit Committee. Louis E. Caldera chairs the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for the
appointment, compensation, and oversight of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee also
represents the Board in overseeing A. H. Belos financial reporting processes, and, as part of this
responsibility, consults with our independent auditors and with personnel from A. H. Belos
internal audit and financial staffs with respect to corporate accounting, reporting, and internal
control practices.
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets both the SEC and the
NYSE standards for independence. In addition, the Board has determined that at least one member of
the Audit Committee meets the NYSE standard of having accounting or related financial management
expertise. The Board has also determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee, Louis
Caldera, the chairman of the Audit Committee, meets the SEC criteria of an audit committee
financial expert.
Compensation Committee. Douglas G. Carlston chairs the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee evaluates
the performance of the chief executive officer and sets his or her compensation level based on this
evaluation. The Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board for base salaries of
other executive officers and compensation for non-management directors, approves bonus levels and
stock option awards for executive officers, and administers among other plans, the Companys 2008
Incentive Compensation Plan, the A. H. Belo Savings Plan, the A. H. Belo Change in Control Severance Plan, the A. H. Belo Pension Transition
Supplement Plan, and the A. H. Belo Pension Transition Supplement Restoration Plan. The Committee
also has responsibility for senior executive succession planning.
A. H. Belo did not exist prior to October 1, 2007 and therefore the compensation for the A. H. Belo named executive officers reflected herein was determined by the Belo Compensation Committee rather than the A. H. Belo Compensation Committee. To assist the Belo Compensation Committee and management in assessing and determining appropriate, competitive
compensation for our executive officers, the Committee annually engages an outside compensation
consultant. Hewitt was retained through February 2007 with respect to prospective 2007 executive compensation recommendations. The scope of Hewitts engagement was to provide ongoing recommendations regarding
executive compensation consistent with Belos business needs, its pay philosophy, market trends and
the latest legal and regulatory considerations; to provide market data as background to annual
decisions regarding CEO and senior management base salary, bonus and long-term incentive amounts;
to advise the Belo committee as to best practices for working effectively with management while
representing shareholders interests; and to provide other
services as the Belo Compensation Committee may
request. The Belo Compensation Committee uses supplemental survey information compiled by its
compensation consultant, along with other survey information, to develop recommendations for base
salary, short-term cash compensation, and long-term incentive compensation for executive officers,
including the chief executive officer. The Belo Compensation Committee develops these compensation
recommendations with input from its compensation consultant. When considering these
recommendations, the Belo Compensation Committee has full access to the compensation consultant
during meetings at which compensation recommendations are considered.
In February 2007, the Belo Compensation Committee engaged mercer as
its compensation consultant going forward. The scope of Mercers
engagement was to undertake a comprehensive review of Belos
executive compensation programs, and to assist in executive
compensation recommendations for year-end 2007 and for 2008. For additional information regarding the operation of the Belo Compensation Committee,
including the role of consultants and management in the process of determining the amount and form
of executive compensation, see the Companys Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) below.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. J. McDonald Williams chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and serves also
as the Boards Lead Director. The responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee include the identification and recommendation of director candidates and the review of
qualifications of directors for continued service on the Board. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee also has responsibility for shaping A. H. Belos corporate governance
practices, including the development and periodic review of the corporate governance guidelines and
the Board committee charters.
In evaluating director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers a
variety of criteria, including an individuals character and integrity; business, professional, and
personal background; skills; current employment; community service; and ability to commit
sufficient time and attention to the activities of the Board. The committee considers these
criteria in the context of the perceived needs of the Board as a whole and seeks to achieve a
diversity of backgrounds and perspectives on the Board.
30
Table of Contents
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee employs a variety of methods for identifying
and evaluating director nominees. The Committee reviews the size and composition of the Board as
part of the annual Board evaluation process and makes recommendations to the Board as appropriate.
If vacancies on the Board are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee considers various potential candidates for directors. Candidates may come to
the Committees attention through current Board members, shareholders, or other persons.
The policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as set forth in A. H. Belos
corporate governance guidelines, is to consider a shareholders recommendation for nominee(s) when
the shareholder supplies the information required for director nominations under the advance notice
provisions set forth in Article II, Section 13 of A. H. Belos bylaws within the time periods set
forth in such section of the bylaws. Shareholders desiring to submit a nomination for director
should consult A. H. Belos bylaws, which are available upon request, for more specific information
prior to submitting a nomination. The Committee evaluates shareholder-recommended nominees based
on the same criteria it uses to evaluate nominees from other sources.
After the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies a potential candidate,
there is a mutual exploration process, during which A. H. Belo seeks to learn more about a
candidates qualifications, background, and level of interest in A. H. Belo, and the candidate has
the opportunity to learn more about A. H. Belo. A candidate may meet with members of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, other directors, and senior management. Based on
information gathered during the course of this process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee makes its recommendation to the Board. If the Board approves the recommendation, the
candidate is nominated for election by A. H. Belos shareholders.
The Board convenes executive sessions of non-management directors without Company management
at each regularly-scheduled meeting. The Lead Director is responsible for presiding at the
executive sessions of the non-management directors. In addition, the independent directors meet in
executive session at least annually. Board committee chairs preside at executive sessions of their
respective committees.
Communications with the Board
The Company has a process for shareholders and other interested parties to communicate with
the Board. These parties may communicate with the Board by writing c/o the corporate Secretary,
P.O. Box 224866, Dallas, Texas 75222-4866. Communications intended for a specific director or
directors (such as the Lead Director or non-management directors) should be addressed to his, her,
or their attention c/o the corporate Secretary at this address. Communications received from
shareholders are forwarded directly to Board members at, or as part
of the materials mailed in advance of,
the next scheduled Board meeting following receipt of the
communications. The Board has
authorized management, in its discretion, to forward communications on a more expedited basis if
circumstances warrant or to exclude a communication if it is illegal, unduly hostile or
threatening, or similarly inappropriate. Advertisements, solicitations for periodical or other
subscriptions, and other similar communications generally are not forwarded to the directors.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Federal securities laws require that A. H. Belos executive officers and directors, and
persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of A. H. Belo common stock, file
reports with the SEC within specified time periods disclosing their beneficial ownership of A. H.
Belo common stock and any subsequent changes in beneficial ownership of A. H. Belo common stock.
No Section 16 reports were required to be filed on behalf of the directors and officers in 2007.
Initial reports on Form 3 for all directors and officers were required to be filed on January 22,
2008, but filed one day late due to administrative error.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
A.
H. Belo has a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all directors, officers
and employees, which can be found at the Companys Web site, www.ahbelo.com. The Company will post
any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as any waivers that are required
to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the NYSE, on the Companys Web site. Information
on A. H. Belos Web site is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
31
Table of Contents
A shareholder can also obtain a printed copy of any of the materials referred to above by
contacting the Company at the following address:
A. H. Belo Corporation
P.O. Box 224866
Dallas, Texas 75222-4866
Attn: Corporate Secretary
Telephone: (214) 977-8200
P.O. Box 224866
Dallas, Texas 75222-4866
Attn: Corporate Secretary
Telephone: (214) 977-8200
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
A. H. Belo did not exist prior to October 1, 2007 and therefore the 2007 compensation for the
A. H. Belo named executive officers reflected herein was not determined by A. H. Belos
Compensation Committee. Accordingly, this Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the
compensation philosophy applied by Belo to its named executive officers with respect to the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007, and the ways in which A. H. Belo anticipates its compensation
philosophy will be similar to or differ from Belo in 2008. The Board of Directors and Compensation
Committee of A. H. Belo are expected to review the elements of executive compensation during fiscal
year 2008 and to make appropriate adjustments for the Company as it now exists.
The named executive officers of A. H. Belo are Robert W. Decherd, James M. Moroney III, Donald
F. (Skip) Cass, Jr., Alison K. Engel, and Daniel J. Blizzard. Of these named executive officers,
only Mr. Decherd was a named executive officer in Belos 2007 proxy statement. Mr. Moroney,
executive vice president of A. H. Belo and publisher of The Dallas Morning News, was a member of
the Belo management committee, but was not a named executive officer in the 2007 Belo proxy
statement. However, his compensation was subject to the oversight of and review by the Belo
Compensation Committee. Mssrs. Cass and Blizzard and Ms. Engel
did not serve on the Belo
Management Committee during fiscal year 2007. As a result, the 2007
compensation of Mr. Cass, Ms. Engel and Mr. Blizzard was not subject to the direct oversight of the Belo compensation committee. Therefore,
throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, references to the historical 2007 executive
compensation program are relevant with respect to Mr. Decherd, and the compensation elements
applicable to the other individuals are described separately where appropriate.
Overview of Compensation Program
Historically,
the Compensation Committee of the Belo Board of Directors has overseen, and
following the distribution the Compensation Committee of the A. H. Belo Board of Directors will
oversee, A. H. Belos overall compensation structure, policies,
and programs. The committee has the
responsibility for establishing, implementing, and continually monitoring adherence to the
Companys compensation philosophy.
Compensation Objectives
Belo adopted, and following the distribution A. H. Belo will adopt, compensation policies to
achieve the following objectives:
| establish a competitive compensation program; | ||
| attract and retain high-caliber executive talent in positions that most directly affect the Companys overall performance; | ||
| motivate and reward executives for achievement of the Companys financial and non-financial performance objectives; | ||
| encourage coordinated and sustained effort toward maximizing the Companys value to its shareholders; and | ||
| align the long-term interests of executives with those of the Companys shareholders. |
Setting Executive Compensation
To
assist the Belo Compensation Committee and management in assessing and determining
appropriate, competitive compensation for Belo executive officers in
2006, the committee engaged an
outside compensation consultant, Hewitt Associates LLC. Mercer LLC (Mercer) provided
consultation beginning in February
32
Table of Contents
2007, and it is anticipated that Mercer will serve as both
Belos and A. H. Belos Compensation Committee consultant in 2008.
Historical Setting of Executive Compensation by Belo
Surveys and Determination of the Median. Belo used several different compensation surveys to
prepare 2007 compensation recommendations for consideration by its
Compensation Committee. For
base salary and total target cash compensation, Belo referenced the Towers Perrin Media Industry
CDB Executive Compensation Database, referred to as the Towers Perrin Media Survey. The Towers
Perrin Media Survey consisted of compensation survey information from 118 companies with media
operations that include newspapers, television stations, television networks, magazines, radio
stations, information publishing, and Internet/online services commonly classified as media. The
median annual revenue for all participants in the Towers Perrin Media Survey was $897 million.
Belo does not choose the participants in the Towers Perrin Media Survey, nor did it provide to its
Compensation Committee the individual names of the 118 participant companies, other than the peer
group selections discussed below.
Belo identified 27 companies within the Towers Perrin Media Survey that shared with Belo
similar characteristics in terms of focus on media operations (i.e., newspaper, television
stations, and Internet operations). Survey data from this group of peer companies, referred to as
the Towers Perrin Peer Group, provided Belo with supplemental information for both base salary and
total target cash compensation for the executive officers. The companies included in the Towers
Perrin Peer Group, the median annual revenue of which was $5.3 billion, were:
§ Advance Publications
|
§ Albritton Communications | § American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. | ||
§ Capitol Broadcasting
|
§ CBS Corporation | § Cox Enterprises | ||
§ Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
|
§ The E. W. Scripps Company | § Fisher Communications | ||
§ Fox Broadcasting
|
§ Freedom Communications | § Gannett Co., Inc. | ||
§ Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.
|
§ The Hearst Corporation | § Landmark Communications | ||
§ The McClatchy Company
|
§ McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. | § Media General, Inc. | ||
§ Meredith Corporation
|
§ NBC Universal, Inc. | § The New York Times Company | ||
§ Seattle Times
|
§ Tribune Company | § Turner Broadcasting | ||
§ Viacom Inc.
|
§ The Washington Post Company | § Yahoo! |
For December 2006 and February 2007 long-term incentive compensation recommendations, Belo
referenced the Towers Perrin CDB Executive Compensation Database for General Industry participants,
referred to as the Towers Perrin General Survey. The Towers Perrin General Survey is a database of
approximately 820 companies that participate in Towers Perrins compensation survey, with 113
companies that have revenues in the $1 billion to $3 billion range. Of these 113 companies, the
median revenue for which was $1.9 billion, 86 companies submitted long-term incentive compensation
data. Belo does not choose the participants in the Towers Perrin General Survey, nor does Towers
Perrin disclose to Belo the names of the companies that comprise the subsets. The Belo
compensation committee found that the larger sample pool of similarly-sized companies in the subset
provided a better source of long-term incentive data than was available by limiting such
information strictly to the Towers Perrin Peer Group because of the widely varying compensation
practices in the media industry. Long-term incentive grant practices in the media industry have
undergone change in the past several years that is, in part, a result in the shift in advertising
dollars away from newspapers and the consolidation of advertising providers throughout the
industry. The Belo compensation committee believes that a larger population of survey respondents
from across industries provided a more reliable basis for recommending long-term compensation, and
that assessing long-term incentive grant practices from a broader group provided more stability to
its long-term incentive compensation analysis. Belo did not observe the same volatility in base
salary and annual incentive compensation practices from the results of the Towers Perrin Media
Survey. Representative industries included in the Towers Perrin General Survey included
aerospace/defense; automotive and transportation; chemicals; computers, hardware, software and
services; consumer products; electronics and scientific equipment; food and beverage; metals and
mining; oil and gas; pharmaceuticals; and telecommunications.
In addition, during 2007, Belos compensation consultant provided Belo with a supplemental
summary of compensation information from a select group of public media companies proxy filings,
referred to as the Proxy Study, that provided total compensation information for their executive
officers from Belos peer companies. The Belo Compensation Committee considers the companies in
the Proxy Study to be similarly situated peer media companies with operational characteristics
similar to Belo. The Belo Compensation Committee uses the Proxy Study as a retrospective
comparison of the average and 50th percentile compensation levels for similar industry executive
officer positions. The companies included in the Proxy Study were:
33
Table of Contents
§ Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
|
§ The E. W. Scripps Company | § Gannett Co., Inc. | ||
§ Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.
|
§ Lee Enterprises, Inc. | § The McClatchy Company | ||
§ Media General, Inc.
|
§ Meredith Corporation | § The New York Times Company | ||
§ Tribune Company
|
§ The Washington Post Company |
Process and Role of Management. Belo used each of these referenced surveys in the manner
described to develop recommendations for base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and
long-term incentive compensation for its executive officers, including its chief executive officer.
These median-level recommendations, which were developed with input
from the Belo Compensation
Committees then-current compensation consultant, were presented by Marian Spitzberg, Belos senior
vice president/Human Resources, to Belos Chief Executive Officer, Robert Decherd. Robert and
Marian adjusted these recommendations after taking into account each individual executive officers
recent performance, as well as his or her experience, level of responsibility, and contributions to
Belos long-term goals during the current year. The Belo compensation recommendations, together
with the compensation histories and the percentile rankings for base salary and total cash
compensation of Belos named executive officers relative to the Towers Perrin Peer Group, were then
presented to the Belo Compensation Committee, which had full access to its compensation consultant,
Robert Decherd, Marian Spitzberg, and the Belo human resources staff who were involved in the
formulation of recommendations. After consideration of the recommendations and adequate
opportunity to address specific questions and concerns, the Belo
Compensation Committee made final
compensation recommendations for the Belo named executive officers, excluding Belos chief
executive officer, to the non-management members of Belos Board
of Directors for their approval.
In its deliberations, the Belo board considered Belos compensation objectives and philosophy in
light of the recommendations. Based on its review and analysis, the non-management members of
Belos Board approved the final compensation to be awarded to each named executive officer, with
the exception of Belos chief executive officer. The Belo committee evaluated and determined
Belos chief executive officers compensation after following the same process. In this regard,
the compensation committee reviewed and received the same peer group information, except that
market data for chief executive officer compensation was provided to
Belos Compensation Committee
without any specific compensation recommendation.
Timing
of Decisions. Historically, the Belo Compensation Committee has had three
regularly-scheduled meetings each year in or around February, July, and December. The committee
usually also has special meetings by telephone or in person periodically as necessary to address
compensation issues that may arise from time to time. With respect to 2007 compensation for Belo
executive officers, the Belo Compensation Committee held the following meetings to review,
discuss, and set or recommend compensation levels:
November 2006
|
Set 2007 financial performance targets; reviewed recommendations for 2007 base salaries, individual cash incentive opportunities and performance-related restricted stock unit awards | |
December 2006
|
Determined or recommended, as applicable, 2007 base salaries | |
Determined or recommended 2007, as applicable, individual cash incentive opportunities | ||
Granted 2007 performance-related restricted stock unit and stock option awards | ||
February 2007
|
Established a maximum incentive award pool to ensure tax deductibility under section 162(m) of the Code | |
July 2007
|
Reviewed and discussed compensation issues, policies, and trends | |
December 2007
|
Considered and approved preliminarily 2007 cash incentive bonuses and time-based restricted stock unit awards based on estimated 2007 financial performance | |
February 2008
|
Certified 2007 financial performance relative to 2007 cash incentive bonuses and restricted stock unit awards, including the number of performance-related restricted stock units earned in respect of 2007 performance |
Setting of A. H. Belo Executive Compensation Going Forward
A. H. Belos named executive officers 2008 compensation was initially set by Belo in December
2007. Thereafter, the A. H. Belo Compensation Committee will oversee executive compensation at
A. H. Belo and the
34
Table of Contents
committee may or may not continue to take an approach similar to that described
above in setting compensation for its
executive officers. The Company anticipates using, either directly or
through A. H. Belos
Compensation Committee compensation consultant, several methods to compare our executive
compensation practices to those of other comparable newspaper companies. These include: using
publicly available market surveys to match the roles of our named executive officers to roles in
the surveys; conducting total compensation studies; and conducting an analysis of our named
executive officers compensation for use in establishing levels for overall long-term incentive
awards and setting compensation for the named executive officers. The Company expects to evaluate
the base salary, annual cash incentive awards, and long-term incentives provided to the named
executive officers of peer newspaper and media companies. The Company expects to
extract this data from publicly available sources with assistance from our compensation consultant.
Elements of 2007 Executive Compensation
Historical Belo Elements of Compensation. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, the
principal elements of compensation for Belos named executive officers were:
| base salary; | ||
| annual cash incentive opportunity; | ||
| long-term equity incentive compensation; and | ||
| retirement and other benefits. |
The structure of Belos executive compensation program is set forth in the Belo Corp. 2004
Executive Compensation Plan, as amended, which was approved by
Belos shareholders and administered by the Belo Compensation
Committee. The Company
refers to the Executive Compensation Plan as the ECP. The Belo ECP provides for two elements of
compensation: short-term cash incentives (performance bonus), and long-term equity-based
compensation. Awards under the ECP are supplemental to an ECP participants base salary.
Officers of Belo and its subsidiaries, including Belos chief executive officer and its other
executive officers, are eligible to participate in the ECP. Additional ECP participants are
selected by the Belo Compensation Committee based on managements evaluation of an individuals
ability to affect significantly Belos profitability.
Elements of A. H. Belo Executive Compensation Going Forward. Following the distribution,
A. H. Belo expects to use a combination of compensation elements similar to those used historically
by Belo as further described below.
Base SalaryHistorical. Base salaries for Belo executive officers are reviewed annually. In
determining base salaries for 2007, Belo gathered base salary data from the Towers Perrin Media
Survey and the Towers Perrin Peer Group for compensation comparisons. The data provided by these
two surveys includes certain statistical factors that make it possible to predict the median
(50th percentile data) for both base salary and total target cash compensation.
Belo
uses this survey data, as applicable to each Belo executive officer, to prepare estimates of median pay for base salary and total target cash compensation
for each executive officer, including its chief executive officer. Because the survey data
provided to Belo by Towers Perrin and its compensation consultant each year generally relates to
the prior year, and current year information is not yet available, the compensation survey data was
aged by 3 percent to take into account Belos general merit increase guideline that factors in
consumer price index and inflation. Recommendations above the median may be made when warranted on
account of an individual executives outstanding performance, promotion, or retention concerns.
Recommendations below the median may also be made when warranted.
As discussed above, the Belo compensation committee reviewed the base salary recommendations
for 2007 and made final recommendations to the Belo board, except with respect to Belos chief
executive officer, for which the compensation committee has final
approval. For 2007, base salaries for the A. H. Belo named executive
officers were compared to market data for similarly
situated officers included in the survey data and in each case, their base salaries set forth in
the Summary Compensation Table fell within an acceptable range of the
estimated median as follows: Robert Decherd 92
percent of the median; Jim Moroney 103 percent of the
median; Skip Cass 91 percent of the median; Ali Engel 79 percent of the
median; and Dan Blizzard 103 percent of the median.
35
Table of Contents
Base SalaryGoing Forward. The 2008 base salaries for the A. H. Belo named executive officers
were initially set by Belo in December 2007 and were ratified by the A. H. Belo Compensation
Committee in January 2008. Median market information for the A. H. Belo named executive officers
was provided by Mercer for consideration by the Compensation Committee. This market information
was based on analyses of data from the Towers Perrin Media Survey for 2007 and available proxy data
of other peer media companies. The 2008 base salaries for the A. H. Belo named executive officers
were set as follows: Jim Moroney $550,000; Skip Cass $465,000; Ali Engel $250,000; and Dan
Blizzard $240,000. Robert Decherds base salary was initially set at $800,000; however, in
February 2008, Robert Decherd voluntarily took a reduction in his 2008 base salary, which the A. H.
Belo Compensation Committee approved in March 2008.
Roberts base salary is now set at $250,000 which is
significantly below the market median. Jim Moroneys base salary
is approximately 4 percent above the median, while
Ms. Engels base salary is materially below the market median for her position but
represents a significant increase over her 2007 base salary in light of her recent promotion to
chief financial officer of A. H. Belo. Relevant market data was not available for Mr.
Cass and Mr. Blizzards positions, and the committee considered their experience and
responsibilities along with their relative positions within the organization and retention needs.
Following the distribution, the A. H. Belo Compensation Committee will review, determine, and
adjust the base salaries of our named executive officers annually.
Annual Cash Incentive OpportunityHistorical. Consistent with Belos objective of motivating
and rewarding executives for achievement of Belos financial and non-financial performance
objectives, each Belo executive officer is eligible to receive annual cash incentive compensation
based on financial performance objectives established in the annual financial plan (the Financial
Plan), approved by Belos Board of Directors at the beginning of each year. The performance goals
are communicated to Belo executive officers at the beginning of each year. The financial
performance objectives vary from year to year and reflect the cyclical nature of Belos businesses
due to fluctuating advertising demand, for example, relating to election years, the Olympics, and
other U.S. sports events, in addition to taking into consideration industry factors that include
decreases in newspaper circulation, significant changes in demand for print classified advertising,
changes in media use habits by consumers and advertisers, and other competitive conditions,
including recruiting and retaining talent.
The Belo
Compensation Committee establishes an annual performance-based incentive pool for
each senior executive, as permitted by the ECP and in compliance with the performance-based
compensation exemption under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
referred to as the Code. This performance pool (3 percent of Belos consolidated net income for
Robert Decherd) provides a maximum for the award of cash and certain equity incentives under the
ECP, described below, and is designed to allow for tax deductibility of the compensation awarded
within the pool. Because they were not named executive officers of Belo for 2007, Messrs. Moroney,
Cass, and Blizzard and Ms. Engel were not subject to a section 162(m) incentive pool for purposes
of 2007 incentive compensation awards. As described below, they were Belo ECP participants in
2007. Based upon Belos 2007 financial performance, cash bonuses were awarded to Belo senior
executives by first considering the amounts that would have been paid to the senior executives
under the method described below for calculating bonuses for other ECP participants.
Under the ECP, the Belo
Compensation Committee establishes a target bonus opportunity
expressed as a percentage of base salary based on competitive market information using the Towers
Perrin Media Survey. The Belo Compensation Committee targets the median, or 50th
percentile, of the Towers Perrin Media Survey and the Towers Perrin Peer Group for annual cash
incentives. The target bonus opportunity for 2007 for Robert Decherd was set by the Belo
Compensation Committee at 90 percent. The other A. H. Belo named executive officers in the Summary
Compensation Table had 2007 target bonus opportunities set as follows: Jim Moroney, 65 percent;
Skip Cass, 50 percent; Ali Engel, 30 percent; and Dan Blizzard, 30 percent. Target bonus
opportunities for 2008 (relating to Belo performance) for each of the A. H. Belo named
executive officers are shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2007 table in the Estimated
Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards column.
The target bonus of 90 percent of base salary for Robert Decherd for 2007 was below the median
target bonus of 100 percent as indicated by the Towers Perrin Media Survey. Jim Moroneys target
bonus of 65 percent of base salary was greater than the survey indicated median of 50 percent for
newspaper chief executives; however, the Belo compensation committee believed this greater target
bonus opportunity was appropriate after considering his responsibilities associated with serving on
the Management Committee of Belo and his length and breadth of experience with the company. The
committee did not consider the market median target bonus percentages for Messrs. Cass and Blizzard
and Ms. Engel for 2007 individually, but rather considered their compensation packages as a whole,
including
36
Table of Contents
total target cash compensation, as part of the entire ECP group, which was approved as a
whole at the Belo Compensation Committees December 2006 meeting.
Actual bonus amounts earned by ECP participants may range from zero to a maximum bonus of
200 percent of the target bonus opportunity established by the Belo Compensation Committee,
depending on the level of achievement of Financial Plan target. For 2007, the Belo Compensation
Committee approved financial performance ranges for Belos named executive officers based on Belos
Financial Plan, as shown in the table below. Bonus payout for performance between points is
prorated.
Opportunity Payout | ||||||||
Performance Level | 2007 EPS Goals | Based on Achievement | ||||||
Maximum |
$ | 1.06 | 200 percent | |||||
Target |
$ | 0.97 | 100 percent | |||||
Threshold |
$ | 0.82 | 10 percent | |||||
Below Threshold |
Less than $0.82 | 0 percent |
The above EPS goals were applicable for Robert Decherd, Ali Engel, Skip Cass, and Dan Blizzard
for 2007. Non-equity incentive awards for Mr. Moroney were based upon attainment of certain
financial goals set for The Dallas Morning News rather than Belos EPS. Belo believes that linking
bonus opportunity directly to financial performance, with an opportunity to earn a 200 percent
payout of target bonus amount if maximum performance is achieved, provides participants with
significant motivation to achieve the companys financial objectives.
Actual EPS of ($2.57) for the year ended December 31, 2007 was adjusted at Belos Compensation
Committees discretion. The primary adjustments included the elimination of the effect of expenses
related to the spin-off of A. H. Belo and non-cash charges related to goodwill impairment.
Negative adjustments to reported EPS included share-based compensation expense and variances
related to changes in newsprint prices. The adjusted EPS of $0.97, which was approved by the Belo
Compensation Committee, was then compared to the EPS target of $0.97 and an achievement of 100
percent of target resulted. Financial results for The Dallas Morning
News resulted in Jim Moroney receiving 78.7% of his target bonus
for 2007.
A proposed cash bonus under the ECP formula was then calculated for each Belo named executive
officer by applying this achievement percentage to each individuals target bonus opportunity. For
example, in 2007, Robert Decherds base salary of $985,000 and target bonus percentage of 90
percent would qualify him for a 100 percent target bonus payout of $886,500. The target-level
incentive payments paid by Belo to the A. H. Belo named executive officers are quantified in the
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
The Belo
Compensation Committee then also assessed the performance and the substantial roles
of each of its executive officers with respect to the spin-off transaction, which was not
contemplated when the financial goals were established. In recognition of their extraordinary
effort and commitment in the successful planning, execution and implementation of the complex
details of the spin-off transaction while at the same time continuing to guide, manage and operate
Belo in a rapidly evolving and challenging operating environment, the Belo Compensation Committee
also approved special cash bonus awards for the named executive officers. As such, the Belo
Compensation Committee recommended special cash bonus awards for 2007 of $2,113,500 for Robert
Decherd, which was subject to the successful completion of the
distribution, and $130,000 for Jim
Moroney, $78,800 for Skip Cass, $41,300 for Ali Engel, and $21,800 for Dan Blizzard. The cash
awards to the named executive officers in excess of the ECP formula are reported in the Bonus
column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Annual Cash Incentive OpportunityGoing Forward. In connection with the distribution, A. H.
Belo adopted an Incentive Compensation Plan (ICP) that is generally similar to that of Belos ECP. The A. H. Belo ICP provides for an annual
cash incentive opportunity that will be based on a target bonus expressed as a percentage of a
named executive officers annual base salary. The 2008 target bonus opportunities, expressed as a
percentage of base salary, for each of A. H. Belos named
executive officers other than Robert Decherd were set as follows:
Jim Moroney 70 percent; Skip Cass 60 percent; Ali Engel 50
percent; and Dan Blizzard 40 percent. These A. H. Belo named executive officers target bonus
opportunities do not materially vary from the median range of market data, except that relevant
market data was not available for Mr. Cass or Mr. Blizzards positions and the committee
considered each executives experience and responsibilities along with his relative position within
the organization and retention needs. In determining the appropriate target bonus percentage for
each A. H. Belo named executive officer, the Belo Compensation Committee used Mercer estimates of
the market median. A. H. Belo has
37
Table of Contents
determined
that the following financial performance measures will be used to
measure 2008 achievements under the ICP: (revenue; interactive revenue; expenses and
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). The
cash incentive opportunity for James M. Moroney III, executive vice
president and Publisher and Chief Executive Officer of The Dallas
Morning News, will be based in part on the performance of The
Dallas Morning News and in part on the consolidated performance
of A. H. Belo.
On
March 25, 2008, the Compensation Committee ratified the
recommendation of its Board of Directors to change the compensation
structure of Robert Decherd. Mr. Decherds new compensation package
will be cash-based and performance-oriented, with an annual target
bonus opportunity based on the same four measures of A. H. Belo
financial performance. If all target levels are achieved, Mr.
Decherd will receive a cash bonus of four times his annual base
salary. If maximum performance levels are achieved, Mr. Decherd will
receive a cash bonus of seven times his annual base salary. The minimum threshold for any cash incentive payment will be
at 85 percent of the revenue target and 60 percent of target with
respect to each of the other three measures of financial performance.
Mr. Decherds actual bonus, if any, will be determined by
extrapolating between the minimum and target, or between target and
maximum, based on actual levels of performance. Mr. Decherd will not
receive any additional long-term incentive compensation with respect
to 2008 compensation. Each year, the Compensation Committee will
determine target and maximum multiples, the performance measures,
and the weighting to be given to each performance measure.
Long-Term Equity Incentive CompensationHistorical. Belo awards long-term equity incentive
grants, or LTI compensation, to executive officers as part of its overall compensation package.
These awards are designed to offer competitive compensation that encourages the retention and
motivation of key executives, and rewards them based upon market-driven results. The ECP provides
the Belo Compensation Committee with discretion to require performance-based standards to be met
before awards vest. Generally, the Belo Compensation Committee determines each executive officers
intended LTI compensation value, then determines the allocation of the LTI compensation award among
three types of equity instruments available under the ECP: stock options, time-based RSUs, referred
to as TBRSUs, and performance-related RSUs, referred to as PBRSUs. Belos LTI equity awards
described below are designed to meet its compensation objectives in three ways. First, stock
options encourage and reward strong stock price performance, thus aligning the executives
interests with those of shareholders. Second, PBRSUs reward the achievement of Belos cumulative
annual financial performance goals. Finally, TBRSUs encourage executives to remain with the
Company and to focus on its long-term success. Since the ultimate value of the LTI compensation
awards depends upon the performance of Belo common stock, the interests of the Belo executive
officers are aligned with the financial interests of Belos shareholders.
Stock Option AwardsHistorical. No stock option awards were made to A. H. Belos named
executive officers during 2007. Generally, stock option awards are granted for shares of Belo
Series B common stock at an exercise price equal to the closing market price of Belos Series A
common stock on the date of grant. The option awards vest 40 percent on the first anniversary of
the date of grant, an additional 30 percent on the second anniversary, and the remaining 30 percent
on the third anniversary of the date of grant. All options expire on the tenth anniversary of the
date of grant. The amounts in the Summary Compensation Table, under the column Option Awards,
include the accounting expense recognized in 2007 by Belo in accordance with FAS 123R for prior
year option grants to the named executive officers. See also the Option Exercises and Stock
Vested in 2007 table for the amounts realized by the executive officers from option exercises in
2007.
Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit AwardsHistorical. TBRSUs awarded to ECP participants,
including Belo executive officers, are based on continued employment with Belo and vest at the end
of a three-year period. The Belo Compensation Committee believes that the three-year cliff vesting
feature of the TBRSUs optimizes their retention effect, and because the ultimate value of the award
depends on Belos stock price, aligns the recipients interest with the maximization of shareholder
value. TBRSU awards made to Belo executive officers are granted out of a performance incentive
pool amount set for each executive, as discussed previously. These awards are generally made in
February following the year of grant when Belos financial performance for the prior fiscal year
can be determined, the incentive pool amount established, and individual performance considerations
assessed. However, this past year TBRSU awards were made in December rather than February, in
light of the spin-off transaction.
Performance-Related Restricted Stock UnitsHistorical. PBRSUs may be awarded to Belo ECP
participants, including Belo executive officers. These awards are earned based upon the same
performance criteria, financial performance achievement levels, and payout levels established
annually for short-term cash incentives. When the actual number of PBRSUs earned is determined
following the close of the fiscal year, the PBRSUs vest at a rate of 33-1/3 percent per year over a
three-year period.
December 2006 Grants. In December 2006, the Belo Compensation Committee made certain LTI
compensation grants in the form of PBRSUs to be earned based on 2007 financial performance. The
actual amount of the award earned was determined in February 2008 when 2007 financial performance
was determined. The Belo Compensation Committee generally strives to set LTI compensation levels near the
median of the Towers Perrin General Survey. That survey data is presented in terms of a multiple
of an ECP participants (including executive officers) base salary. The resulting LTI
compensation recommendations at the median level for Belo executive officers other than Robert were
then provided to Robert and Marian Spitzberg for their review and consideration. Based on their
review of the information available for each of the executive officers, and after consideration of
retention and succession planning issues and the performance and potential of each individual, an
LTI compensation recommendation for each executive officer was prepared for the Belo Compensation
Committees review and approval. These recommendations were at
or only slightly below the median for each of the named executive
officers, with the exception of Ms. Engel, whose LTI award was
slightly less than double the estimated median. Ms. Engel received
this award based on the committees assessment of her contributions
to the operations of the Belo and potential for future contributions,
along with a recognition of the need to provide substantive reward
for long-term retention.
Hewitt, the Belo Compensation Committees then-current compensation consultant, determined that
2007 survey data for Robert Decherds long-term compensation had perceived limitations because the
survey-indicated median levels appeared to deviate substantially from historical market trends, and
would have resulted in an award recommendation significantly above prior year percentage increases.
As a result, the LTI compensation level for Robert indicated in December 2006 was provided to the Belo Compensation Committee without any recommended
38
Table of Contents
upward adjustment from his
award level for the previous year, which was approximately at the median level at the time of the
award in December 2005.
The Belo Compensation Committee determined that one-half of the median-level LTI compensation
would be awarded in the form of PBRSUs for its named executive
officers, except Robert Decherd, as follows: Jim Moroney
24,140 units; Skip Cass 19,070 units; Ali
Engel 3,180 units; and Dan Blizzard 2,380
units.
These target level awards were subject to 2007 financial performance criteria as established by the
Belo Compensation Committee. The remaining one-half of the recommended LTI compensation was
reserved for awards of TBRSUs. Skip Cass, Ali Engel, and Dan Blizzard received these TBRSUs in
December 2006, while awards of TBRSUs for Robert Decherd and Jim Moroney were made in February 2007
in recognition of final 2006 performance, as discussed below. Robert Decherds LTI compensation,
which was equivalent to the previous years market median, was divided into thirds: 157,320
options awarded for 2006 financial performance, 52,440 PBRSUs to be earned in 2007, and the
remaining one third in the form of TBRSUs awarded in February 2007, also in recognition of final
2006 performance. See discussion of February 2007 TBRSU Grants below.
February 2007 TBRSU Grants. In February 2007, the Belo Compensation Committee made LTI
compensation awards in the form of TBRSUs based on Belo 2006 financial performance using LTI
recommendations for grants previously approved by the Belo Compensation Committee in December 2006
for Robert Decherd and Jim Moroney. The grant date fair value of these awards is reported under
the column Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards
in 2007 Table. Additionally, the amounts in the Summary Compensation Table, under the column
Stock Awards, include the accounting expense recognized in 2007 by Belo in accordance with
FAS123R for these awards to A. H. Belo named executive officers.
December 2007 Grants. In December 2007, in light of the impending spin-off transaction, the
Belo compensation committee made LTI compensation awards to the executive officers and to certain
other officers of Belo, including those who would become executive officers of A. H. Belo. To
emphasize the importance of retaining these executives in the smaller post-spin companies in a
changing business environment, and to encourage focus on Belos business goals during the
transition period following the spin-off, the Belo Compensation Committee determined that the
December 2007 LTI compensation awards would be made in the form of TBRSUs. Because a large portion
of the ultimate value of the LTI compensation awards depends upon the performance of Belo common
stock, the interests of the executive officers are aligned with the financial interests of Belos
shareholders. A portion of the ultimate value of LTI awards will also depend upon the stock price
of A. H. Belo to the extent awards were subject to the distribution of A. H. Belo common stock at
the time of the spin-off.
The Belo Compensation Committee made recommendations for LTI compensation levels in December
2007 through the matching of the positions of Belos executives with data for similar positions in
companies the size of Belo prior to the spin-off. The data for the named executives was obtained
primarily from the Proxy Study and in consultation with Mercer for positions not specifically
identified in the Proxy Study, particularly for Messrs. Cass and
Blizzard. Recommendations for the December 2007 LTI awards were presented to the Belo Compensation Committee
for each of the named executives that were between the median and
75th percentile as indicated by market data, except for
Ms. Engel and Mr. Blizzard. LTI recommendations for
Ms. Engel and Mr. Blizzard were made at levels that
exceeded the 75th percentile.
In December 2007, awards of Belo TBRSUs were made to the A. H. Belo named executive officers
as follows: Robert Decherd 157,640 units; Jim Moroney 57,160 units; Skip Cass 45,130 units;
Ali Engel 18,050 units; and Dan Blizzard 12,030 units. These awards were valued at the closing
market price of Belo common stock on the date of the award, or $16.62 per unit. The awards are
intended to recognize, reward, and retain executive talent during and following the distribution.
With the exception of Mr. Decherd, whose award is equivalent to the recommended market median, each
of the other named executive officer long-term incentive compensation awards materially exceeds the
market median. The awards for Mr. Moroney and Mr. Cass fall in a range that is less than the 75th
percentile of the market-based survey and were determined to be warranted in light of the Companys
retention needs prior to and after the distribution. The awards for Ms. Engel and Mr. Blizzard are
both in excess of the 75th percentile of the survey, however, the committee believes the awards are
appropriate especially in light of Ms. Engels below-market median base salary and Mr. Blizzards
overall contributions to the Company, as well as retention requirements.
The
grant date fair value of these TBRSU awards for each of the A. H. Belo named executive officers
are reported under the column Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards in the Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in 2007 table. Belo did not make any grants of PBRSUs to its named executive officers
during 2007 in respect of 2008 financial performance in light of the spin-off transaction.
February 2008 Grants. In February 2008, Belo assessed the December 2006 target grant of
PBRSUs against 2007 financial performance, and PBRSUs were paid to A. H. Belos named executive
officers at 100 percent of target,
39
Table of Contents
except for Jim Moroney, who earned 78.7% of his target award.
The amounts in the Summary Compensation Table, under the column Stock Awards, include the
accounting expense recognized by Belo in 2007 in accordance with FAS 123R for PBRSU awards to the
named executive officers.
Long-Term Incentive CompensationGoing Forward. Our named executive officers will be entitled
to receive long-term equity awards from time to time as determined by the A. H. Belo Compensation
Committee under the A. H. Belo ICP commensurate with their respective post-distribution positions
of responsibility. The Company anticipates that long-term incentive awards under the A. H. Belo
ICP may consist of stock options, TBRSUs, PBRSUs, or other awards permitted under the plan. In March 2008, the Compensation Committee approved a 2008 compensation package for the chief executive officer, Robert Decherd, that included no additional LTI awards with respect to 2008 compensation.
Stock Option AwardsGoing Forward. The Company has not determined if and when in 2008 there
will be grants of stock option awards for A. H. Belo common stock. If the A. H. Belo Compensation
Committee determines that stock option awards are appropriate, then they would likely be granted
for shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock at an exercise price equal to the closing market
price of A. H. Belos Series A common stock on the date of grant. Under the new A. H. Belo ICP,
vesting and expiration is similar to that under the Belo ECP.
Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit AwardsGoing Forward. The Company may grant TBRSU awards to
our named executive officers for A. H. Belo common stock. If the A. H. Belo Compensation Committee
determines that TBRSU awards are appropriate, then they would most likely be granted under terms
and conditions similar to those described above for Belo under A. H. Belos ICP.
Performance-Related Restricted Stock Unit AwardsGoing Forward. The Company may grant PBRSU
awards to our named executive officers for A. H. Belo common stock. If the A. H. Belo Compensation
Committee determines that PBRSU awards are appropriate, then they would most likely be granted
under terms and conditions similar to those described above for Belo under A. H. Belos ICP.
Retirement BenefitsHistorical. Through March 31, 2007, Belo offered pension benefits to
certain employees through its tax qualified Pension Plan. Effective March 31, 2007, the Pension
Plan was frozen and all affected employees were provided with transition benefits, including the
granting of five years of additional credited service. In addition, Belo maintained the Belo
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP, for key executives, approved by the Belo
Compensation Committee, Belos SERP is an
account-balance plan, and does not guarantee a specific benefit amount to participants. The
primary purpose of the SERP was to provide retirement benefits to key executives that were intended
to restore retirement benefits restricted by IRS limits on qualified plans, such as the Pension
Plan and the Belo Savings Plan (401(k) Plan) in which our executive officers also participate.
Through 2007, Belo made annual contributions to the SERP on behalf of each of its executive
officers who were also participants in the SERP; however, effective January 1, 2008, Belo suspended
contributions to the SERP and authorized the distribution of all SERP benefits to participants,
including Robert Decherd, Jim Moroney, and Skip Cass, in a lump-sum payment made in January 2008.
Ms. Engel and Mr. Blizzard were not Belo SERP participants. For additional discussion of the
Pension Plan and the SERP, see Post-Employment BenefitsPension Plan and Non-Qualified Deferred
CompensationSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan below.
Retirement BenefitsGoing Forward. The Compensation Committee of A. H. Belo is evaluating
supplemental retirement plans for its key executives.
Change in Control and Severance Benefits
Employment Agreements and Benefit PlansHistorical. At December 31, 2007, Belo did not have any individual
employment severance agreements with any of its executive officers. Under Belos ECP, the compensation and benefits of all plan participants, which include Belos executive officers, may be affected by a change in control of Belo. Generally under the ECP, a change in control event means the first of
the following to occur, unless the Belo board of directors has adopted a resolution stipulating
that such event will not constitute a change in control for purposes of the ECP:
| commencement or public announcement of a tender offer for all or any part of Belos common stock; | ||
| acquisition of more than 30 percent of all shares of Belo common stock; | ||
| shareholder approval of a merger in which Belo does not survive as an independent public company; | ||
| shareholder approval of a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Belos assets; or | ||
| specified changes in the majority composition of Belos board. |
Following a change in control of Belo, ECP bonuses are paid in full at the higher of target or
forecasted full-year results in the year of the change in control; stock options held by
management, including sales executives and non-employee directors, become fully-vested and are
immediately exercisable; TBRSUs vest and are payable in full immediately; and PBRSUs vest at the
higher of target or forecasted full-year results in the year of the change in control; and all
vested units are payable in full immediately. See Potential Payments on Termination or Change in
Control at December 31, 2007 for additional discussion.
In addition, effective October 1,
2007, following a review performed by Mercer of change in control severance plans at media peer
companies and based on general industry data, Belo adopted a change in control severance plan.
Companies included in the media peer group review were Gannett Co., Inc, Tribune Company, The
Washington Post Company, The New York Times Company, the E.W. Scripps Company, Dow Jones & Company,
Inc., The McClatchy Company, Meredith Corporation, Lee Enterprises, Inc., Media General, Inc., and
The Hearst Corporation. General industry data was obtained from the Mercer 350 study, a study of
compensation trends and market practices conducted for The Wall Street Journal that analyzes 350 of
the largest United States public companies with median 2006 revenue of $7.9 billion. Over 70
percent of the companies in each group provide participation in change in control severance plans
to key executives. Belos severance plan was adopted in light of media industry consolidation, including a
number of notable industry mergers, in order to promote executive retention and reduce the level of
uncertainty and distraction that is likely to result from a change in control or potential change
in control of Belo. Belo does not design its other elements of compensation in anticipation of a
change in control, but instead change in control payments provide security to
executives in the event of job loss in a triggering
40
Table of Contents
transaction. The Belo plan provides for
severance benefits for designated participants in the event of a change in control of Belo and a
termination of employment under specified circumstances. The
triggering change in control events under the severance plan are
similar to the triggering events under Belos ECP. The initial participants, as designated
by the Belo Compensation Committee, are Belos executive officers. Additional participants may be
designated by the committee from time to time.
Participants in
the change in control severance plan are approved by the Belo Compensation
Committee and are entitled to benefits upon termination of employment within 24 months of a change
in control of Belo if such termination is (1) involuntary other than for cause as defined in the
plan or (2) voluntary for good reason as defined in the plan. In addition, a participant may
voluntarily terminate employment for any reason or without reason during the 30 day period
immediately following the first anniversary of a change in control and will be entitled to receive
payments and benefits under the plan. The triggering of severance benefits upon the occurrence of
both a change in control and termination of employment is a common feature of change in control
benefits surveyed. Belo also believes that the ability of a participant to trigger change in
control benefits during a one-month period following the first anniversary of a change in control
assures continuity of senior management by giving senior executives an incentive to stay following
a change in control, knowing that they will not experience a loss of severance benefits should
there ultimately be incompatibility with new ownership or management. Upon such termination, a participant will
receive his or her base salary in effect at the time of change in control, plus the greater of (i)
current target bonus in effect prior to the change in control or (ii) actual bonus (defined as the
average of the last three years bonus payments), multiplied by the severance multiple set forth
below:
Severance | ||||
Position | Multiple | |||
Chief Executive Officer |
3.0 | |||
Members of Belos Management Committee (other than CEO) |
2.5 | |||
Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents (other than Management
Committee members) |
2.0 | |||
Vice Presidents |
1.5 |
In addition, a participant will receive a cash payment in lieu of (1) employer-provided
contributions to the Belo Savings Plan and the Pension Transition Supplement Plan for a number of
years equal to the participants severance multiple; (2) cost of medical and dental benefits in
excess of employee premiums for a number of years equal to the participants severance multiple;
and (3) reimbursement for employment outplacement services up to $25,000 and legal expenses
incurred to enforce participants rights under the plan.
The severance multiples for participants in the Belo plan are in the range of typical
multiples in the plans surveyed by Mercer. If all or a portion of any payment or distribution by
Belo under the plan is subject to excise tax, then Belo will make a gross-up payment to the
terminated employee, designed to cover the excess tax liability.
Employment Agreements or ArrangementsGoing Forward. In connection with the distribution
transaction, and upon consultation with Mercer, Belo provided certain retention and special bonuses
to a selected group of executives and managers, including those of A. H. Belo. The retention
incentive bonuses were intended to counter the effect of an offer by a potential employer during
the uncertain time before, during, and after the distribution of A. H. Belo and will serve to
retain key employees in important positions who have institutional knowledge that would be
difficult to replace or restore during and after the distribution. The Belo compensation committee
approved retention bonuses for Skip Cass, Ali Engel, and Dan Blizzard. The retention bonus is
comprised of a payment to be made 90 days following the distribution date that is equivalent to 20
percent of the executives base salary, plus an assurance that such executives bonus for 2008
(payable in early 2009) will be equivalent to the greater of target or actual bonus achieved for
2008 under the A. H. Belo ICP. Estimated total retention bonuses are as follows: Skip Cass,
$372,000; Ali Engel, $175,000; and Dan Blizzard, $144,000.
Change in Control Severance PlanGoing Forward. A. H. Belo has a change in control severance
plan similar to that of Belos plan described above covering specified participants that would be
triggered, among other circumstances, if there is a change in control (as defined to include the acquisition of 30 percent or
more of the combined voting power of our outstanding voting stock) and a qualifying termination (or
constructive termination) of employment during the 24-month period following a change in control.
In addition, a participant may voluntarily terminate employment for any reason or without reason
during the 30-day period immediately following the first anniversary of a change in control and
will be entitled to receive payments and benefits under the severance plan. The triggering events
would result in the payment of specified severance benefits, including a lump sum multiple of
participants compensation, outplacement services, vesting of long-
41
Table of Contents
term incentive awards, and
gross up payment if necessary to satisfy certain tax payments relating to the severance payments.
The distribution was not a change in control event under the plan. For
additional discussion, see 2007 Belo Executive
CompensationTermination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements.
Pension Transition Supplement Restoration PlanHistorical. Effective April 1, 2007, Belo
adopted the Pension Transition Supplement Restoration Plan, or the Restoration Plan, as a
non-qualified plan, to provide the portion of PTS Plan benefit that cannot be provided under the
PTS Plan because of Code limitations on the amount of qualified plan benefits. Generally under the
Restoration Plan, a change in control will occur on the date that:
| any person or group acquired more than 50 percent of the total fair market value or total voting power of Belo stock; | ||
| any person or group acquired 30 percent or more of the total voting power of Belo stock; | ||
| a majority of the members of Belos Board are replaced during any 12-month period by persons not appointed or endorsed by a majority of Belos Board prior to the date of such appointment or election; or | ||
| any person or group acquired Belo assets having a total gross fair market value of 40 percent or more of the total gross fair market value of all Belo assets. Since there were zero account balances in the Restoration Plan as of December 31, 2007, no benefits are listed in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2007 table. |
Upon the
occurrence of a change in control, the Belo Compensation Committee has the right, but
not the obligation, to terminate the Restoration Plan and distribute the entire balance of
participants accounts to the participants.
OtherHistorical.
Upon a change in control, the trust that held assets to fund SERP
benefits would have become irrevocable and, subject to the prior claims of Belos creditors, the
assets of the trust would not have been recoverable by Belo until all SERP benefits had been paid. As discussed in Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation, the SERP was suspended effective January 1, 2008 and account balances were distributed to the participants. Because
all Pension Plan participants are fully vested in their benefits under that plan, a change in
control would have no effect upon participants benefits. In addition, the ECP provides for
accelerated vesting of equity awards for terminating employees who meet the criteria for early
retirement (age 55 or more with three years of service). Except in connection with the recently
adopted change in control severance plan, Belos named executive officers do not receive tax gross
up payments to compensate them for taxes incurred as a result of payments or benefits received in
connection with a change in control or termination of employment. The distribution of A. H. Belo was not a change in control under the Belo plans.
42
Table of Contents
In addition to the change in control provisions in these plans, Belo has general severance
guidelines that may or may not be followed in any particular instance when an executive officer
leaves Belo. These guidelines do not entitle executive officers to any specific severance benefit
or amount of benefit in the event of termination of employment. For additional discussion, see
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements and the Potential Payments on
Termination or Change in Control at December 31, 2007 table, below.
Employee Benefit PlansGoing Forward. The change in control provisions in the A. H. Belo ICP
and the
A. H. Belo Pension Transition Supplement Restoration Plan contain terms and conditions similar to those contained in the Belo plans described above.
A. H. Belo Pension Transition Supplement Restoration Plan contain terms and conditions similar to those contained in the Belo plans described above.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Doug
G. Carlston (Chair), Louis E. Caldera, Laurence E. Hirsch and J.
McDonald Williams have served as
members of the A. H. Belo Compensation Committee since December 2007. No member of the A. H. Belo
Compensation Committee during 2007 was a current or former officer or employee of A. H. Belo or had
any relationship with A. H. Belo requiring disclosure under Item 13. Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence. None of Belos executive officers served as a
director or as a member of the Compensation Committee (or other committee serving an equivalent
function) of any other entity that had an executive officer serving as a director or as a member of
A. H. Belos Compensation Committee during 2007.
Compensation Committee Report
In accordance with its written charter adopted by our Board, the Compensation Committee has
oversight of the Companys overall compensation structure, policies and programs. In exercising
its oversight responsibility, the Committee has retained a compensation consultant to advise the
Committee regarding market and general compensation trends.
The Committee, after consultation with its compensation consultant, has reviewed and discussed
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management, which has the responsibility for
preparing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based upon this review and discussion, the
Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Douglas G. Carlston, Chair
Louis E. Caldera
Laurence E. Hirsch
J. McDonald Williams
Douglas G. Carlston, Chair
Louis E. Caldera
Laurence E. Hirsch
J. McDonald Williams
43
Table of Contents
2007 Belo Executive Compensation
The following information summarizes annual and long-term compensation awarded to, earned by,
or paid to A. H. Belos principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and its three
other most highly-paid executive officers (the named executive officers) for services in all
capacities to Belo and its subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. All references in the following tables to stock, stock options, and restricted stock
units relate to awards of stock, stock options, and restricted stock units granted by Belo. These
amounts do not necessarily reflect the compensation those persons will receive following the
spin-off of A. H. Belo, which could be higher or lower, because historical compensation was
determined by Belo and future compensation levels will be determined based on the compensation
policies, programs, and procedures established by A. H. Belos compensation committee.
Summary Compensation Table | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-qualified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Equity | Deferred | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and | Stock | Option | Incentive Plan | Compensation | Compen- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Bonus | Awards | Awards | Compensation | Earnings | sation | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Position | Year | Salary | ($)(1) | ($)(2) | ($)(2) | ($)(3) | ($)(4) | ($)(5) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
2007 | $ | 985,000 | $ | 2,113,500 | $ | 4,967,189 | $ | 503,115 | $ | 886,500 | $ | 174,230 | $ | 574,892 | $ | 10,204,426 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chairman of the Board, |
2006 | $ | 925,000 | $ | 11,300 | $ | 1,499,519 | $ | 1,873,307 | $ | 1,088,700 | $ | 52,722 | $ | 288,945 | $ | 5,739,493 | |||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief
Executive Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James M. Moroney III |
2007 | $ | 528,000 | $ | 130,000 | $ | 396,624 | $ | 186,302 | $ | 270,000 | $ | 47,574 | $ | 82,497 | $ | 1,640,997 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President, |
2006 | $ | 510,000 | $ | 5,900 | $ | 86,971 | $ | 394,824 | $ | 144,100 | $ | 26,378 | $ | 77,832 | $ | 1,246,005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Publisher
and CEO, The Dallas Morning News |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
2007 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 78,800 | $ | 396,211 | $ | 92,543 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 20,730 | $ | 39,321 | $ | 1,302,605 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President |
2006 | $ | 420,000 | $ | 71,200 | $ | 109,866 | $ | 190,415 | $ | 253,300 | $ | 9,160 | $ | 34,656 | $ | 1,088,597 | |||||||||||||||||||
and Secretary |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alison K. Engel |
2007 | $ | 183,700 | $ | 41,300 | $ | 69,722 | $ | 6,640 | $ | 55,200 | | $ | 14,625 | $ | 371,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President/ |
2006 | $ | 175,000 | $ | 21,100 | $ | 15,121 | $ | 8,475 | $ | 68,700 | | $ | 13,049 | $ | 301,445 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
2007 | $ | 207,500 | $ | 21,800 | $ | 49,807 | $ | 23,688 | $ | 62,300 | | $ | 14,625 | $ | 379,720 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President |
2006 | $ | 201,500 | | $ | 14,448 | $ | 47,001 | $ | 79,100 | | $ | 8,937 | $ | 350,986 |
(1) | The amounts in column (d) for 2007 represent special bonuses in excess of amounts earned under the ECP in recognition of each executives role in helping formulate and manage the spin-off transaction. For 2006, these amounts for Robert Decherd and Jim Moroney represent the portion of the cash incentive award that was in excess of the formula under Belos ECP due to a rounding upward of the named executive officers award. The amounts for Ali Engel and Skip Cass represent the cash portion of a special discretionary award in recognition of their contributions to the success of Belos strategic initiatives during the year. | |
(2) | The amounts in columns (e) and (f) reflect accounting expense recognized in 2007 and 2006 for all outstanding share-based compensation issued in the form of time-based restricted stock units (TBRSUs), performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSUs), and stock options. The amounts reported in columns (e) and (f) above were recognized according to the rules of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number 123 as Revised (FAS 123R), which requires recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation over the appropriate vesting period for the award. Expense amounts include dividend equivalents, but exclude risk of forfeiture assumptions for purposes of this disclosure. Plan provisions provide for accelerated vesting of equity awards for terminating employees that meet the criteria for early retirement (age 55 or more with three years of service). Therefore, under FAS 123R, expense for equity awards for employees that meet the early retirement criteria must be fully recognized in the year of the award. Robert Decherd meets these criteria. The amounts in column (e) for 2007 for both Skip Cass and Ali Engel include the compensation expense associated with special TBRSU awards of 1,570 and 460, respectively, which instead of a three-year vesting period, have a one-year vesting period. These RSUs were awarded along with the cash component in column (d), as described in footnote 1, in recognition of their contributions toward the success of Belos strategic initiatives during the year. The grant date fair value of stock awards in 2007 is presented in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2007 table. There were no stock option awards in 2007. For additional discussion on assumptions made in determining the grant date fair value of share-based awards, see the Combined Financial Statements, Note 4Long-Term Incentive Plan to the combined financial statements. | |
(3) | Amounts in column (g) above were paid in February 2008 and 2007 in respect of 2007 and 2006 performance, respectively, relative to financial performance targets and goals. Belo does not allow for the deferral of any amounts earned by its executives outside of the Belo Savings Plan, a qualified 401(k) plan available to substantially all employees. For further discussion os non-equity incentive compensation, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis Elements of 2007 Executive Compensation Annual Cash Incentive Opportunity Historical. | |
(4) | The amounts indicated in column (h) are comprised of the increase in pension value for each named executive officer for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Changes in pension value for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflect the addition of 5 years of service credit and the freeze of all pension benefits effective March 31, 2007. For further discussion, see Pension Benefits at December 31, 2007 on page 49. Ali Engel and Dan Blizzard do not participate in the pension plan; therefore, no amounts are reported in column (h) for them. | |
(5) | For 2006 and 2007, Belo contributed the following amounts to the Belo Savings Plan and the Belo Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), which amounts are included in column (i): |
44
Table of Contents
Belo Savings | ||||||||||||||||
Plan | SERP | |||||||||||||||
Contribution($) (a) | Contribution($) (b) | |||||||||||||||
Name | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
$ | 11,925 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 541,754 | $ | 271,055 | ||||||||
James M. Moroney III |
$ | 11,925 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 70,572 | $ | 70,572 | ||||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
$ | 11,925 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 27,396 | $ | 27,396 | ||||||||
Alison K. Engel |
$ | 14,625 | $ | 13,049 | $ | | | |||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
$ | 14,625 | $ | 8,937 | $ | | |
The 2007 SERP contribution for Robert Decherd indicated above includes $360,932 as a
make-up contribution attributable to his previous participation in Belos Management
Security Plan (MSP), which was terminated December 31, 1999. Of this make-up
amount, $270,699 is an acceleration of benefits scheduled to be made in 2009, 2010
and 2011. In light of Belos decision to suspend the SERP effective January 1,
2008, these future contributions were made in January 2008 just prior to the SERP
account distribution. For more information, see Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation for 2007 on page 51. Because Ali Engel and Dan Blizzard do not
participate in the Pension Plan, each is eligible for a larger company contribution
to their Belo Savings Plan account. Neither Ms. Engel nor Mr. Blizzard was a
participant in the SERP during 2006 or 2007.
Additionally, amounts in the All Other Compensation column (i) for 2007 include
$8,760 and $7,420 for life insurance purchased for Robert Decherd in 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and $12,453 and $3,210 for tax gross-ups in 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Of these amounts, $3,520 is related to the life insurance mentioned
previously and $8,933 relates to Belos MSP make-up contribution to the SERP in
2007. The 2006 gross-ups for life insurance and MSP make-up contributions were
$2,982 and $2,233, respectively.
The total value of executive perquisites and personal benefits did not exceed
$10,000 for any named executive officer.
The following table summarizes cash-based and equity awards that were granted under the Belo
ECP during 2007.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Grant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Future Payouts | Awards: | Date Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Non-Equity Incentive | Number of | Value of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plan Awards(1) | Shares of | Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grant | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Stock or | Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Date | ($) | ($) | ($) | Units(2) | ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (i) | (l) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
2/28/2007 | | | | 50,920 | $ | 948,640 | |||||||||||||||||||||
12/7/2007 | $ | 72,000 | $ | 720,000 | $ | 1,440,000 | 157,640 | $ | 2,619,977 | |||||||||||||||||||
James M. Moroney III |
2/28/2007 | | | | 23,440 | $ | 436,687 | |||||||||||||||||||||
12/7/2007 | $ | 38,500 | $ | 385,000 | $ | 770,000 | 57,160 | $ | 949,999 | |||||||||||||||||||
Donald F. (Skip)
Cass, Jr. |
12/7/2007 | $ | 27,900 | $ | 279,000 | $ | 558,000 | 45,130 | $ | 750,061 | ||||||||||||||||||
Alison K. Engel |
12/7/2007 | $ | 12,500 | $ | 125,000 | $ | 250,000 | 18,050 | $ | 299,991 | ||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
12/7/2007 | $ | 9,600 | $ | 96,000 | $ | 192,000 | 12,030 | $ | 199,939 |
(1) | The estimated future payouts under Belos non-equity incentive plan awards are subject to a Belo performance period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. However, effective with the spin-off of A. H. Belo on February 8, 2008, each of the named executive officers identified above became officers of A. H. Belo. Consequently, they will not be entitled to receive the entirety of any non-equity incentive plan awards granted by Belo on December 7, 2007, but will be entitled to receive all of the TBRSUs granted on February 28, 2007 and December 7, 2007, subject to additional vesting requirements, namely continued employment with A. H. Belo. | |
(2) | The TBRSUs awarded February 28, 2007 are in recognition of 2006 performance. Following the conclusion of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, financial performance was evaluated and an incentive pool was established for providing incentive compensation to named executive officers, Robert Decherd and Jim Moroney, including TBRSUs. The TBRSUs approved by Belos compensation committee for each executive receiving such an award on |
45
Table of Contents
this date are subject to a vesting period that ends on the date of the annual earnings release for Belo for the year ending December 31, 2009. The TBRSUs awarded December 7, 2007 are in recognition of each executives performance for the year ending December 31, 2007. These awards will vest after approximately three years on the date of the annual earnings release for the year ending December 31, 2010. All TBRSUs are eligible for dividend equivalents in such amounts and such frequency as those declared on Belo Series A common stock. For additional discussion, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 38-39. | ||
(3) | The fair value estimates indicated above do not include any adjustments for risk of forfeiture. The fair value for the TBRSUs awarded February 28, 2007 is based on the closing market price of Belo Series A common stock on that date, which was $18.63. The fair value of the TBRSUs awarded December 7, 2007 uses the closing market price for a share of Belo Series A common stock on the grant date of $16.62. For additional discussion, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 38-39. |
For 2007, the proportion of equity-based compensation in relation to total compensation,
excluding changes in pension value and above-market interest from non-qualified deferred
compensation plans, for each of the named executive officers was as follows: Robert Decherd-55
percent; Jim Moroney-37 percent; Skip Cass-38 percent; Ali Engel-21 percent; and Dan Blizzard-19
percent.
46
Table of Contents
Equity Holdings and Value Realization
The following table contains information on all Belo Corp. equity awards that were outstanding
as of December 31, 2007.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Number of | Number of | Shares or | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | Securities | Shares or | Units of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying | Underlying | Units of | Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unexercised | Unexercised | Option | Stock That | That | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Options(#) | Options(#) | Exercise | Option | Have Not | Have Not | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable | Unexercisable | Price | Expiration | Vested | Vested | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name | (1) | (1) | ($) | Date | #(2) | ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
62,928 | 94,392 | $ | 18.0900 | 12/13/2016 | 32,692 | $ | 570,148 | ||||||||||||||||||
78,400 | 33,600 | $ | 21.6200 | 12/09/2015 | 59,500 | $ | 1,037,680 | |||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | $ | 25.2000 | 12/03/2014 | 52,440 | $ | 914,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | $ | 27.9400 | 12/05/2013 | 50,920 | $ | 888,045 | ||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | $ | 21.5900 | 12/06/2012 | 157,640 | $ | 2,749,242 | ||||||||||||||||||||
410,000 | $ | 17.8800 | 11/30/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
332,136 | $ | 17.3125 | 12/01/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
340,000 | $ | 19.1250 | 12/16/2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
200,000 | $ | 17.7500 | 12/16/2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
James M. Moroney III |
19,250 | 8,250 | $ | 21.6200 | 12/09/2015 | 871 | $ | 15,190 | ||||||||||||||||||
85,000 | $ | 25.2000 | 12/03/2014 | 13,900 | $ | 242,416 | ||||||||||||||||||||
75,000 | $ | 27.9400 | 12/05/2013 | 18,988 | $ | 331,151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
76,000 | $ | 21.5900 | 12/06/2012 | 23,440 | $ | 408,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||
104,000 | $ | 17.8800 | 11/30/2011 | 57,160 | $ | 996,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | $ | 17.3125 | 12/01/2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
90,500 | $ | 19.1250 | 12/16/2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | $ | 17.7500 | 12/16/2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
14,350 | 6,150 | $ | 21.6200 | 12/09/2015 | 8,000 | $ | 139,520 | ||||||||||||||||||
34,000 | $ | 25.2000 | 12/03/2014 | 5,166 | $ | 90,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||
34,000 | $ | 27.9400 | 12/05/2013 | 19,070 | $ | 332,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||
34,000 | $ | 21.5900 | 12/06/2012 | 1,570 | $ | 27,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||
43,000 | $ | 17.8800 | 11/30/2011 | 19,070 | $ | 332,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||
24,000 | $ | 19.1250 | 12/16/2009 | 45,130 | $ | 787,067 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alison K. Engel |
2,450 | 1,050 | $ | 21.6200 | 12/09/2015 | 2,000 | $ | 34,880 | ||||||||||||||||||
3,180 | $ | 55,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3,180 | $ | 55,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
460 | $ | 8,022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
18,050 | $ | 314,792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
3,500 | 1,500 | $ | 21.6200 | 12/09/2015 | 2,000 | $ | 34,880 | ||||||||||||||||||
9,000 | $ | 25.2000 | 12/03/2014 | 2,380 | $ | 41,507 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,000 | $ | 27.9400 | 12/05/2013 | 2,380 | $ | 41,507 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8,600 | $ | 21.5900 | 12/06/2012 | 12,030 | $ | 209,803 |
(1) | Vesting dates for each outstanding Belo Corp. option award for the named executive officers are: |
Exercise | Robert W. | James M. | Donald F. (Skip) | Alison K. | Daniel J. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting Date | Price | Decherd | Moroney III | Cass, Jr. | Engel | Blizzard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 9, 2008 |
$ | 21.62 | 33,600 | 8,250 | 6,150 | 1,050 | 1,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 13, 2008 |
$ | 18.09 | 47,196 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 13, 2009 |
$ | 18.09 | 47,196 | | | | |
All stock options become exercisable in increments of 40 percent after one year and 30 percent after each of years two and three. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the plan), all of the options become immediately exercisable, unless Belos board of directors has adopted resolutions making the acceleration provisions inoperative (or does so promptly following such occurrence). See also footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table of this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding vesting upon early retirement. | ||
(2) | The amounts in column (g) reflect unvested TBRSUs and PBRSUs, respectively, that have been earned as of December 31, 2007, but which remain subject to additional vesting requirements that depend upon the executives continued employment with either Belo or A. H. Belo. |
47
Table of Contents
Scheduled vesting of all outstanding Belo Corp. awards for each of the named executive officers is as follows: |
Donald F. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting | Award | Robert W. | James M. | (Skip) | Alison K. | Daniel J. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date | Type | Decherd | Moroney III | Cass, Jr. | Engel | Blizzard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 13, 2008 |
2005 PBRSU | 16,346 | 435 | 2,582 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 13, 2008 |
2006 TBRSU | | | 1,570 | 460 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 26, 2008 |
2006 PBRSU | 17,480 | 6,329 | 6,356 | 1,060 | 793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 1, 2009* |
2005 PBRSU | 16,346 | 436 | 2,584 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 1, 2009* |
2006 PBRSU | 17,480 | 6,329 | 6,356 | 1,060 | 793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 1, 2009* |
2005 TBRSU | 59,500 | 13,900 | 8,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 1, 2010* |
2006 PBRSU | 17,480 | 6,330 | 6,358 | 1,060 | 794 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 1, 2010* |
2006 TBRSU | 50,920 | 23,440 | 19,070 | 3,180 | 2,380 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 1, 2011* |
2007 TBRSU | 157,640 | 57,160 | 45,130 | 18,050 | 12,030 |
* | February 1 is used as a projected earnings release date for purposes of this disclosure. Actual vesting date is the earnings release date for Belo for the previous completed fiscal year ending December 31. See also footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table on page 44 regarding vesting upon early retirement. | |
(3) | The market value at year-end for outstanding awards still subject to vesting is based on the closing market price of a share of Belo Series A common stock for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $17.44. |
The following table presents information on amounts realized from options that were exercised
and stock awards that vested during the 2007 fiscal year.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Number of Shares | |||||||||||||||
Acquired on | Value Realized on | Acquired on | Value Realized on | |||||||||||||
Name | Exercise(#) | Exercise($) | Vesting(#) | Vesting($) | ||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c)(1) | (d) | (e)(2) | ||||||||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
77,864 | $ | 234,176 | 16,346 | $ | 305,997 | ||||||||||
James M. Moroney III |
| | 435 | $ | 8,143 | |||||||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
| | 2,582 | $ | 48,464 | |||||||||||
Alison K. Engel |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
7,200 | $ | 30,802 | | |
(1) | The value realized upon the exercise of stock option awards is equal to the difference between the market value of Belo Series A common stock at the time of exercise and the stock option exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares acquired upon exercise of the stock option. | |
(2) | The value realized upon vesting of PBRSUs is equal to the number of units vesting times the closing market price of a share of Belo Series A common stock on the vesting date, which was $18.72 for Robert Decherd and Jim Moroney, whose awards vested February 27, 2007, and $18.77 for Skip Cass, whose awards vested February 8, 2007. The vested stock awards represent one-third of the December 2005 PBRSU award. |
Post-Employment Benefits
Pension Plan. Through March 31, 2007, Belo offered pension benefits to certain employees
through its tax-qualified pension plan, The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan (the Pension
Plan). Until July 1, 2000, this non-contributory Pension Plan was available to substantially all
Belo employees who had completed one year of service and had reached 21 years of age. The Pension
Plan was amended effective July 1, 2000. As a result, individuals who were participants or eligible to become
participants prior to July 1, 2000 were offered an election to either (1) remain eligible to
participate in and accrue benefits under the Pension Plan, or (2) cease accruing benefits under the
Pension Plan as of the applicable effective date. Those employees who elected to cease accruing
benefits under the Pension Plan became eligible for enhanced benefits under the Belo Savings Plan,
a tax-qualified defined contribution plan. Effective March 31, 2007, the Pension Plan was frozen
and all affected employees were provided with transition benefits including the granting of five
years of additional credited service and the payment of pension transition supplements over a
period of five additional years, provided the participant remains employed by Belo or A. H. Belo
for the five-year period. Robert Decherd, Jim Moroney and Skip Cass were participants in the
Pension Plan at the time of the freeze and received such transition benefits. In addition,
beginning April 1, 2007, these executives, along with all other former Pension Plan participants
48
Table of Contents
who remained active employees became eligible for increased matching and profit sharing
contributions under the Belo Savings Plan, a qualified 401(k) plan maintained for substantially all
employees.
The Pension Plan provides for the payment of a monthly retirement benefit based on credited
years of service and the average of five consecutive years of highest annual compensation out of
the ten most recent calendar years of employment referred to as final monthly compensation. The
formula for determining an individual participants benefit is as follows: 1.1 percent times final
monthly compensation times years of credited service plus .35 percent times final monthly
compensation in excess of covered compensation times years of credited service (up to 35 years).
Compensation covered under the Pension Plan includes regular pay plus overtime, bonuses,
commissions, and any contribution made by the Company on behalf of an employee pursuant to a
deferral election under any benefit plan containing a cash or deferred arrangement. Covered
compensation excludes certain non-cash earnings and Belo matching contributions to the Belo Savings
Plan. A participants interest in the Pension Plan ordinarily becomes fully vested upon completion
of five years of credited service, or upon attainment of age 62, whichever first occurs. However,
as a result of the plan amendment described above, any participant employed by Belo on July 1, 2000
is fully vested without regard to years of service or the age of the participant. Retirement
benefits under the pension plan are paid to participants upon normal retirement at the age of 65 or
later, or upon early retirement, which may occur as early as age 55. An early retirement reduction
factor, which is applied to the participants normal age 65 monthly benefit, is based on the
participants Social Security normal retirement age. The percentage reduction factor is the sum of
3.33 percent times the number of years of payment between ages 55 and 60 increased for each year
the Social Security normal retirement age exceeds age 65, plus 6.67 percent times the number of
years between ages 60 and 65 decreased for each year the Social Security normal retirement age
exceeds age 65. For example, a participant with a Social Security normal retirement age of 67 who
elects to begin receiving pension benefits at age 57 would have a reduction factor of 36.7 percent.
The Pension Plan also provides for the payment of death benefits. The covered compensation of the
named executive officers who are participants in the Pension Plan is comprised of base salary and
cash incentive compensation received, up to a limit of $225,000 for all participants in 2007.
Pension Transition Supplement Plan. Effective April 1, 2007, the Belo Board adopted the
Pension Transition Supplement Plan, or PTS Plan. The PTS Plan was adopted to provide those
employees who participated in the Pension Plan and were affected by the Pension Plan freeze a
supplemental benefit designed to replace a portion of the pension benefit they would have earned
had the Pension Plan not been frozen. The PTS Plan is an account balance plan that is intended to
qualify under the provisions of Section 401(a) of the Code.
The table below presents the present value of each named executive officers benefit under the
Pension Plan at age 65, based upon credited years of service and covered compensation as of
December 31, 2007. Credited years of service includes the additional five years awarded to all
active participants in the Pension Plan as of the date the Plan was frozen on March 31, 2007. Each
of the named executive officers, except Ali Engel and Dan Blizzard,
received this five year credit. For the Pension Plan, Belo uses a
December 31 measurenent date for financial reporting purposes with
respect to Belo's audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2007.
Pension Benefits at December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||
Number | ||||||||||
of Years | ||||||||||
of | ||||||||||
Credited | Present Value of | |||||||||
Service | Accumulated | |||||||||
Name | Plan Name | (#)(1) | Benefit ($)(2) | |||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | |||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan | 39 | $ | 720,466 | ||||||
James M. Moroney III |
The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan | 31 | $ | 340,928 | ||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan | 18 | $ | 107,813 | ||||||
Alison K. Engel(3) |
The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan | | | |||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard(3) |
The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan | | |
49
Table of Contents
(1) | Belo froze benefits under the Pension Plan effective March 31, 2007, and transition benefits are being provided to affected employees, including the granting of five years of additional credited service. The number of years of credited service reflected in column (c) and the present value of accumulated benefit reflected in column (d) include the 5-year credit, as well as service through March 31, 2007, the date of the freeze. | |
Amounts indicated in column (d) do not include pension transition supplement payments that Belo funded into the PTS Plan, a qualified defined contribution retirement plan, in March 2008. These accrued payments represent additional transition benefits earned by the named executives who were active participants in the Pension Plan at the time it was frozen on March 31, 2007. Additional pension transition supplement payments will be made for the eligible named executive officers for the calendar years ending December 31, 2008 through 2011, and for the three-month period from January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012, provided the named executive officer remains an A. H. Belo employee. The 2007 contribution amounts for each of the named executive officers who participate in the Pension Plan are as follows: |
Robert W. Decherd |
$ | 12,083 | ||
James M. Moroney III |
$ | 16,656 | ||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
$ | 9,636 |
(2) | Belos pension costs and obligations are calculated using various actuarial assumptions and methodologies as prescribed under SFAS 87Employers Accounting for Pensions, as amended by SFAS 158Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. To assist in developing these assumptions and methodologies, Belo uses the services of an independent consulting firm. To determine the benefit obligations, the assumptions Belo uses include, but are not limited to, the selection of the discount rate and projected salary increases. For additional information regarding the valuation methodology and material assumptions used in quantifying the pension benefits, see the Combined Financial Statements, Note 6Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans. At December 31, 2007, Robert Decherd is eligible to receive benefits under the early retirement provisions of the Pension Plan. | |
(3) | Ali Engel and Dan Blizzard do not participate in the Pension Plan. |
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Pension Transition Supplement Restoration Plan. Effective April 1, 2007, the Belo Board
adopted the Restoration Plan as a non-qualified plan, to provide the portion of the PTS Plan
benefit that cannot be provided under the PTS Plan because of Code limitations on the amount of
qualified plan benefits. None of the executive officers had an account balance in this plan as of
December 31, 2007.
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan. The Belo SERP provided a supplemental retirement
benefit to key executives beyond the qualified retirement benefits allowed by the IRS. Federal tax
law limits the amount of annual pay ($225,000 in 2007) that can be used in calculating benefits
under qualified plans such as the Pension Plan and the Belo Savings Plan. Through 2007, Belo made
annual contributions to the SERP on behalf of Robert Decherd, Jim Moroney and Skip Cass; however,
effective January 1, 2008, Belo suspended contributions to the SERP and authorized the distribution
of all SERP benefits to the executive officers.
The SERP was a non-qualified defined contribution plan to which Belo made annual contributions
on behalf of its participants. To determine the amount of the annual Belo contribution, the value
of a participants age 65 retirement benefit using the same benefit formula as that used in the
Pension Plan, was projected with and without regard to IRS limits. The value of the difference
between the two projected amounts was the projected SERP benefit. Every three years, the projected
SERP benefit and the annual contribution amount necessary to fund the projected SERP benefit was
calculated using certain assumptions about future eligible earnings and the investment rate of
return. This amount was contributed annually to a Rabbi Trust and became subject to market gains
and losses. The trust remained a general asset of Belo and was subject to the claims of Belos
creditors.
The balance in each named executive officers SERP account was made up of the total of Belos
contributions plus an allocation of the investment gains and losses of the trust that held account
balances. Executives with three years of continuous service with the Company were fully vested in
their SERP account balance. Executives were not permitted to make contributions to the SERP.
50
Table of Contents
The table below presents the allocation in the SERP for each named executive officer:
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2007 | ||||||||||||
Registrant | Aggregate | Aggregate | ||||||||||
Contributions | Earnings | Balance at | ||||||||||
in Last FY | in Last FY | Last FYE | ||||||||||
Name | ($)(1) | ($) | ($)(2) | |||||||||
(a) | (c) | (d) | (f) | |||||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
$ | 541,754 | $ | 257,539 | $ | 4,583,214 | ||||||
James M. Moroney III |
$ | 70,572 | $ | 50,523 | $ | 863,402 | ||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
$ | 27,396 | $ | 10,572 | $ | 193,295 | ||||||
Alison K. Engel |
| | | |||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
| | |
(1) | The contribution amounts presented in column (c) are included in column (i) All Other Compensation of the Summary Compensation Table of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Ali Engel and Dan Blizzard were not participants in the SERP in 2007. | |
(2) | Amounts indicated in column (f) represent each named executive officers allocated balance from the Belo SERP. The SERP is an account balance plan; therefore, the accumulated balance in each participants account is available as a lump sum distribution in the event of termination for any reason, other than cause as determined by Belos compensation committee. In January 2008, in anticipation of the impending spin-off the SERP was suspended and all participants account balances were distributed in a lump sum. The aggregate balances indicated in column (f) above represent the total amounts distributed to each of the named executive officers. |
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
The following descriptions reflect the amount of compensation that would have become payable
to each of the named executive officers under then-existing arrangements if the named executives
employment had terminated and/or had there been a change in control on December 31, 2007, given the
named executives compensation and service levels at Belo as of such date and, if applicable, based
on Belos closing stock price on that date. These amounts are in addition to benefits that were
available without regard to the occurrence of any termination of employment or change in control,
including then-exercisable stock options, and benefits available generally to salaried employees.
Except as
described below and on page 40 under
Compensation Discussion and Analyses Change in Control
and Severance Benefits, at December 31, 2007 Belo did not have individual written
agreements with any of the named executive officers that would provide guaranteed payments or
benefits in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control. Effective October 1,
2007, Belo adopted a change in control severance plan. As of February 8, 2008, A. H. Belo has
adopted a similar change in control severance plan. Generally, a
change in control under the A. H. Belo Corporation Change in Control
Severance Plan includes (1) the acquisition by a person or group
of 30 percent or more of the combined voting power of the
Companys voting securities (excluding voting securities held by
Robert Decherd and voting securities held by any entity over which
Robert Decherd has sole or shared voting power); (2) certain
changes in the membership of the Companys board of directors
that are not approved by the incumbent directors;
(3) consummation of a business combination or sale of
substantially all of the Companys assets, unless immediately
following such transaction the beneficial owners of shares of A. H.
Belos common stock and other securities eligible to vote
immediately prior to the transaction beneficially own more than 60
percent of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the
continuing company resulting from such transaction; or
(4) approval by A. H. Belo shareholders of a plan of liquidation
or dissolution.
The amounts presented in the table below with respect to change in control payments are based
upon the terms of the Belo plan as of December 31, 2007. The actual amounts that would be paid
upon a named executive officers termination of employment or a change in control can be determined
only at the time of any such event. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount
of any benefits provided upon any such event, the actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher
or lower than the amounts set forth in the table that follows. Factors that could affect these
amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, Belos stock price and the
executives age.
The approximate value of the severance benefits available to each of the named executive
officers under the Belo ECP or the Belo Change in Control Severance Plan, if he or she had been
terminated, or had there been a change in control, on December 31, 2007, would have been as
follows, based on a closing market price of $17.44 for Belos
Series A common stock on December 31, 2007. Effective Feburary 8, 2008, each
A. H. Belo named executive officer became a designated participant in
A. H. Belos change in control severance plan and ceased
participation in Belos change in control severance plan.
51
Table of Contents
Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control at December 31, 2007 | ||||||||
Death, Disability or | ||||||||
Retirement After | ||||||||
Age 55 with Three | ||||||||
Name and Description of Benefit | Change in Control | Years Service | ||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
||||||||
Non-equity incentives(1) |
$ | 886,500 | $ | | ||||
Time-based RSUs(2) |
4,674,966 | 4,674,966 | ||||||
Performance-related RSUs(3) |
1,484,711 | 1,484,711 | ||||||
Change in Control Severance Plan Payments(4) |
9,023,245 | | ||||||
Total |
$ | 16,069,422 | $ | 6,159,677 | ||||
James M. Moroney III |
||||||||
Non-equity incentives(1) |
$ | 343,200 | $ | | ||||
Time-based RSUs(2) |
1,648,080 | 1,648,080 | ||||||
Performance-related RSUs(3) |
436,186 | 346,309 | ||||||
Change in Control Severance Plan Payments(4) |
3,531,389 | | ||||||
Total |
$ | 5,958,855 | $ | 1,994,389 | ||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
||||||||
Non-equity incentives(1) |
$ | 225,000 | $ | | ||||
Time-based RSUs(2) |
1,286,549 | 1,286,549 | ||||||
Performance-related RSUs(3) |
422,674 | 422,674 | ||||||
Change in Control Severance Plan Payments(4) |
2,164,993 | | ||||||
Total |
$ | 4,099,216 | $ | 1,709,223 | ||||
Alison K. Engel |
||||||||
Non-equity incentives(1) |
$ | 55,200 | $ | | ||||
Time-based RSUs(2) |
413,154 | 413,154 | ||||||
Performance-related RSUs(3) |
55,459 | 55,459 | ||||||
Change in Control Severance Plan Payments(4) |
641,932 | | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,165,745 | $ | 468,613 | ||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
||||||||
Non-equity incentives(1) |
$ | 62,300 | $ | | ||||
Time-based RSUs(2) |
286,190 | 286,190 | ||||||
Performance-related RSUs(3) |
41,507 | 41,507 | ||||||
Change in Control Severance Plan Payments(4) |
462,418 | | ||||||
Total |
$ | 852,415 | $ | 327,697 |
(1) | In the event of a change in control, short-term, non-equity incentives (cash bonuses) are paid in a lump sum to each executive at the higher of target or actual financial performance based on current full-year forecasted results (taking into consideration actual financial performance to date). Cash bonuses are not automatically paid for executives terminating under other circumstances. See Compensation Discussion and AnalysisChange in Control and Severance Benefits on page 40 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of change in control events under the Belo ECP. | |
(2) | All unvested TBRSUs are forfeited immediately in the event an executive is terminated with or without cause or voluntarily resigns. In the event of a change in control or an executives retirement after age 55 with at least three years of service, qualification for long-term disability, or death, vesting of all TBRSUs is accelerated and payment is made as soon as practicable. |
52
Table of Contents
(3) | All unvested PBRSUs are forfeited immediately in the event an executive is terminated with or without cause or voluntarily resigns. In the event of an executives retirement after age 55 with at least three years of service, qualification for long-term disability, or death, vesting of all earned but unvested PBRSUs is accelerated and payment is made as soon as practicable. In the event of a change in control, unearned PBRSUs are earned and paid at the higher of target or actual financial performance based on current full-year forecasted results (taking into consideration actual financial performance to date). | |
(4) | Under Belos change in control severance plan, each designated executive is eligible for certain payments that depend on the executives position with Belo at the time of the change in control. As of December 31, 2007, the following multiples would have applied to each of the named executive officers payments under the plan had a change in control occurred: Robert Decherd, 3; Jim Moroney, 2.5; Skip Cass, 2; Ali Engel, 1.5; and Dan Blizzard, 1.5. These multiples are used to determine the total cash payment to be awarded to each executive, and are applied to the sum of the following components: (1) base salary in effect at the time of the change in control; (2) higher of the current target bonus in effect prior to the change in control or the average of the last three years bonus payments; (3) employer-provided contributions to the Belo Savings Plan and Pension Transition Supplement payments for the current year; and (4) employer cost of medical and dental benefits in excess of employee premiums. In addition to this change in control amount, the employee is also eligible for outplacement services valued at no more than $25,000, plus reimbursement for any legal fees incurred to enforce the participants rights under the plan. The assumptions for outplacement costs and legal fees in the table above for each executive were $25,000 and $0, respectively. To the extent the cash payment and the value related to the acceleration of vesting for outstanding equity awards exceeds 3 times the employees average taxable compensation earned during the five years preceding the year of the change in control, excise taxes will be assessed. If all or a portion of the distribution is subject to excise tax, Belo will make a gross up payment to the terminated employee. For each of the executives included in the table above, with the exception of Mr. Blizzard, an estimated gross up of excise taxes has been included in the total cash payment amount. The distribution is not a change in control event under the plan. |
A. H. Belo Compensation Arrangements
A. H. Belo has adopted effective as of February 8, 2008, the following benefit plans with
terms substantially similar to Belos benefit plans: the A. H. Belo 2008 Incentive Compensation
Plan, the A. H. Belo Savings Plan, the A. H. Belo Pension Transition
Supplement Plan, the A. H.
Belo Pension Transition Supplement Restoration Plan and the Change in
Control Severance Plan. Effective as of the spin-off, each A. H. Belo
named executive officer became a participant in each of these plans, except that Ali Engel and Dan Blizzard
do not participate in the PTS Plan or the Restoration Plan.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Belo Director Compensation for 2007
During
2007, non-employee directors of Belo Corp. received an annual retainer package with
a nominal value of $140,000. One-half of the Belo boards annual retainer was divided between
options to purchase Belo Series B common stock and TBRSUs for Belo Series A common stock. The
number of options granted was determined based on the Black-Scholes value determined for accounting
purposes, and the number of RSUs granted was derived from the closing market price of Belo Series A
common stock on the date of the award. Belo directors elected in advance to receive all or a
portion of the remaining amount of their annual retainer in additional stock options for Belo
Series B common stock or in cash. Awards were made effective with the May 8, 2007 date of the Belo
annual shareholders meeting. All references in the following tables to stock, stock options, and
restricted stock units relate to awards of stock, stock options, and restricted stock units granted
by Belo.
Belo directors who served as committee chairs in 2007 received an additional $10,000 in cash
compensation. Belo reimburses all directors for travel expenses incurred in attending meetings. No
additional fee is paid to directors for attendance at Belo Board and committee meetings. Robert
Decherd, who was an executive officer of Belo during 2007, did not receive separate compensation
for Belo Board service. Robert continues to serve as a Belo director and Jim Moroney was selected
to the Belo Board of Directors effective February 8, 2008. Effective February 8, 2008, Robert and
Jim Moroney each ceased being a Belo employee and executive officer, thereby qualifying for
non-employee director compensation for 2008 service. In addition,
Robert Decherd will receive additional compensation for his role
as non-executive Chairman of the Board. The non-employee directors identified in the chart below
were all Belo directors in 2007, but became directors of A. H. Belo in connection with the spin-off
transaction:
Fees Earned or | Stock | Option | |||||||||||||||
Paid in Cash | Awards | Awards | Total | ||||||||||||||
Name | ($) | ($)(1) | ($)(2) | ($) | |||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (h) | |||||||||||||
Louis E. Caldera |
$ | 70,000 | $ | 36,710 | $ | 32,173 | $ | 138,883 | |||||||||
Douglas G. Carlston(3) |
$ | 55,243 | $ | 15,261 | $ | 15,259 | $ | 85,763 | |||||||||
Dealey D. Herndon |
$ | 70,000 | $ | 36,710 | $ | 32,173 | $ | 138,883 | |||||||||
Laurence E. Hirsch |
| $ | 36,710 | $ | 96,514 | $ | 133,224 | ||||||||||
J. McDonald Williams |
$ | 80,000 | $ | 36,710 | $ | 32,173 | $ | 148,883 |
53
Table of Contents
(1) | The amounts indicated in column (c) for stock awards are based on the accounting expense recognized by Belo under the requirements of FAS 123R, which includes dividend equivalents. Expense is recorded over the one-year vesting period for each award beginning at the time of grant, which was the date of the Belo annual meeting of shareholders on May 8, 2007. The actual grant date fair value of these awards was $34,981 for each director, with the exception of Doug Carlston, who was elected to the Board of Directors effective July 26, 2007. The grant date fair value of his award was $27,624. See note (3). Once vested, the TBRSUs are paid two years later, on the date of the Belo annual meeting of shareholders three years from the date of the original award. Payment of vested RSUs is made 60 percent in shares of Belo Series A common stock and 40 percent in cash. | |
Belo directors who voluntarily resign or retire from board service prior to the vesting of TBRSUs will receive a proportionate amount of the award based on actual service. Payment will be made on the normal payment date, which is three years from the date of the award. Vesting is accelerated and payment is made immediately for TBRSUs held by a director who becomes disabled or dies. Following are the TBRSU holdings of each of Belos non-employee directors as of December 31, 2007: |
May 2006 Award | May 2007 Award | July 2007 Award | ||||||||||
Name | Payable in May 2009 | Payable in May 2010 | Payable in May 2010 | |||||||||
Louis E. Caldera |
2,205 | 1,730 | | |||||||||
Douglas G. Carlston(3) |
| | 1,482 | |||||||||
Dealey D. Herndon |
2,205 | 1,730 | | |||||||||
Laurence E. Hirsch |
2,205 | 1,730 | | |||||||||
J. McDonald Williams |
2,205 | 1,730 | |
(2) | Amounts indicated in column (d) for option awards represent the accounting expense recognized by Belo in 2007 under the requirements of FAS 123R for stock options held by non-employee directors. Belo uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of options. The grant date fair value for the option awards made to each Belo non-employee director, with the exception of Doug Carlston and Larry Hirsch, was $35,002. The grant date fair value of Dougs and Larrys awards were $27,621 and $105,001, respectively. For additional information with respect to the assumptions and valuation methodology for share-based compensation, see the Combined Financial Statements, Note 4Long-Term Incentive Plan. The option exercise price is equal to the closing market price of Belo Series A common stock on the date of grant. Options generally vest one year from the date of grant and expire 10 years from the date of grant. Directors who are elected at a time other than an annual meeting of shareholders receive a proportionate share of compensation relative to the service provided during an ordinary one-year term. Vesting and payment dates for equity awards are adjusted to coincide with dates of awards relative to the previous annual meeting date. Belo directors who voluntarily resign from board service prior to the vesting of options forfeit unvested options. Vesting is accelerated for options held by a director who retires at the boards mandatory retirement age of 68, becomes disabled, or dies. In any event, vested options remain exercisable for the original term of the award for all former directors. Following are the stock option holdings of each of Belos non-employee directors as of December 31, 2007: |
Outstanding | Exercisable | |||||||
Name | Stock Options | Stock Options | ||||||
Louis E. Caldera |
50,113 | 44,440 | ||||||
Douglas G. Carlston(3) |
5,134 | | ||||||
Dealey D. Herndon |
72,310 | 66,637 | ||||||
Laurence E. Hirsch |
147,573 | 130,555 | ||||||
J. McDonald Williams |
99,789 | 94,116 |
(3) | Doug Carlston was elected to Belos Board on July 26, 2007. He was awarded a proportionate share of the standard annual compensation package, comprised of 50 percent cash, 25 percent stock options for Belo Series B common stock and 25 percent TBRSUs. Dougs option and RSU awards will vest on the date of the May 2008 annual meeting of Belo shareholders. |
A. H.
Belo Director Compensation for 2008-2009
In May 2008, non-employee directors will receive an annual retainer package for 2008-2009 with
a nominal value of $140,000. One-half of the Boards annual retainer is divided between options to
purchase A. H. Belo Series B common stock and TBRSUs for A. H. Belo Series A common stock. The
number of options granted is determined based on the Black-Scholes value determined for accounting
purposes, and the number of TBRSUs granted is derived from the closing market price of A. H. Belo
common stock on the date of grant. The remaining amount of their annual retainer will be paid in
cash. In future years, directors may be given the opportunity to elect in advance to receive additional stock options for A. H.
Belo Series B common stock instead of cash.
Directors who serve as committee chairs in 2008-2009 will receive an additional $10,000 in
cash. A. H. Belo reimburses all directors for travel expenses incurred in attending meetings. No
additional fee is paid to directors for attendance at Board and committee meetings. Robert
Decherd, who serves an executive officer of the Company, will not receive separate compensation for
Board service.
54
Table of Contents
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Ownership A. H. Belo Common Stock
The following tables set forth information as of March 15, 2008 regarding the beneficial
ownership of A. H. Belo common stock by each of A. H. Belos current directors, the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, all directors and executive officers as a group,
and by each other person A. H. Belo believes to own more than 5 percent of the outstanding shares
of A. H. Belo Series A or Series B common stock. At the close of business on March 15, 2008, there
were 17,629,526 A. H. Belo Series A shares, 2,848,496 A. H. Belo
Series B shares, and 20,478,022 combined A. H. Belo Series A and Series B shares issued and outstanding.
Under the rules of the SEC, the beneficial ownership of a person or group includes not only
shares held directly or indirectly by the person or group but also shares the person or group has
the right to acquire within 60 days of March 15, 2008 (to and including May 14, 2008) pursuant to
exercisable options and convertible securities. The information below, including the percentage
calculations, is based on beneficial ownership of shares rather than direct ownership of issued and
outstanding shares.
Unless otherwise indicated, each person listed below has sole voting power and sole
dispositive power with respect to the shares of common stock indicated in the table as beneficially
owned by such person. Series A common stock has one vote per share and Series B common stock has
ten votes per share. Consequently, the voting power of Series B holders is greater than the number
of shares beneficially owned. For example, the shares of A. H. Belo common stock beneficially owned
by all A. H. Belo directors and executive officers as a group,
representing 15.4 percent of the
outstanding shares of A. H. Belo Series A and Series B common stock have combined voting power of
58.5 percent. There are no known voting arrangements relating to A. H. Belo common stock among any
of the persons listed below.
A. H. Belo Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
Shares of A. H. Belo Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
And Percentage of Outstanding Shares as of
March 15, 2008(1)(2)(3)
Beneficially Owned
And Percentage of Outstanding Shares as of
March 15, 2008(1)(2)(3)
Combined Series A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A | Series B | and Series B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Decherd*+ |
9,908 | * | * | 1,663,866 | 51.1 | % | 1,673,774 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
James M. Moroney III+ |
41,601 | * | * | 738,078 | 24.8 | % | 779,679 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr.+ |
2,159 | * | * | 37,070 | 1.3 | % | 39,229 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Alison K. Engel+ |
195 | * | * | 490 | * | * | 685 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard+ |
94 | * | * | 5,820 | * | * | 5,914 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Louis E. Caldera* |
| * | * | 10,022 | * | * | 10,022 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Douglas G. Carlston* |
| * | * | 1,026 | * | * | 1,026 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Dealey D. Herndon* |
140,855 | * | * | 548,710 | 19.2 | % | 689,565 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Laurence E. Hirsch* |
2,000 | * | * | 29,514 | 1.0 | * | 31,514 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
J. McDonald Williams* |
1,200 | * | * | 17,504 | * | * | 18,704 | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||
All directors and
executive officers as a
group (10 persons) |
198,012 | 1.1 | % | 3,052,100 | 87.4 | % | 3,250,112 | 15.4 | % |
* | Director | |
+ | Executive Officer | |
** | Less than one percent | |
(1) | Series B shares are convertible at any time on a share-for-share basis into Series A shares but not vice versa. For purposes of determining the number of Series A shares beneficially owned by the persons listed, the person may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the Series A shares into which the Series B shares owned are convertible. The numbers listed in the Series A column, however, do not reflect the Series A shares that may be deemed to be beneficially owned by the person listed because of this convertibility feature. If the Series A total included shares into which Series B shares held are convertible, the persons listed would be deemed to be the beneficial owners of the following percentages of the Series A shares: Robert Decherd, 8.7 percent; Jim Moroney, 4.2 percent; Dealey Herndon, 3.8 percent; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 15.7 percent. All other persons listed would be deemed to beneficially own less than 1 percent of the Series A shares. These percentages are calculated by taking the persons number |
55
Table of Contents
of combined Series A and Series B shares as reflected in the table above and dividing that number by the sum of (a) the Series A shares issued and outstanding, plus (b) the total of Series B shares owned by the person as reflected in the table above, plus (c) the persons exercisable Series A stock options plus shares issuable upon the vesting and payment of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards listed in footnote (2) to the table. | ||
The family relationships among the directors and named executive officers are as follows: Robert Decherd and Dealey Herndon are brother and sister and are second cousins of Jim Moroney. | ||
The following shares are included in the individuals holdings because the individual has either sole or shared voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares. | ||
Skip
Cass309 Series A shares and 400 Series B shares owned
by Skip and his wife as to which he shares voting and dispositive power.
|
||
Robert Decherd2,796 Series A shares held in trust for which Robert serves as trustee; Robert disclaims beneficial ownership of these
shares. Roberts holdings also include 4,631 Series B shares owned by him and his wife as to which he shares voting and dispositive
power. |
||
Dealey Herndon4,000 Series A shares held by a charitable foundation she established and for which she serves as a director. Dealey
disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
||
Jim Moroney10,399 Series A shares and 470,055 Series B shares held by Moroney Management, Limited, a family limited partnership of
which he is the managing general partner, and 10,420 Series B shares held in a family trust as to which he has sole voting authority, as
well as 96 Series B shares owned by Jim and his wife as to which he shares voting and dispositive power. Jims holdings also include
5,960 Series A shares held by a family charitable foundation for which Jim serves as trustee; 6,790 Series A and 52,940 Series B shares
and options to acquire 3,669 Series B shares held by the Estate of James M. Moroney, Jr., of which Jim is the executor; and 8,095
Series A shares and 75,319 Series B shares owned by Jims mother as to which he has voting and dispositive power. |
||
(2) | The number of shares shown in the table above includes (a) A. H. Belo shares held in the A. H. Belo Savings Plan at March 15, 2008, and (b) shares that could be purchased by exercise of options exercisable on March 15, 2008 or within 60 days thereafter (to and including May 14, 2008) under A. H. Belos equity compensation plans, and (c) shares that could be received upon the vesting and payment of RSU awards through May 14, 2008, as follows: |
Exercisable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares of | Stock Options for | Net Shares Issuable Upon | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A. H. Belo Common | Shares of A. H. | Vesting & Payment of | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Held in | Belo | RSU Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A. H. Belo Savings Plan | Common Stock | through May 14, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Series A | Series B | Series A | Series B | Series A | Series B | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert W. Decherd |
1,093 | | | 404,691 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
James M. Moroney III |
981 | | | 123,619 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Donald F. (Skip) Cass, Jr. |
591 | | | 36,670 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Alison K. Engel |
13 | | | 490 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Daniel J. Blizzard |
| | | 5,820 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Louis E. Caldera |
| | | 10,022 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Douglas G. Carlston |
| | | 1,026 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Dealey D. Herndon |
| | | 14,461 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Laurence E. Hirsch |
| | | 29,514 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
J. McDonald Williams |
| | | 16,304 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
All directors and
executive officers as a
group (10 persons) |
2,678 | | | 642,617 | | |
(3) | Pursuant to SEC rules, the percentages in the table are calculated by taking the number of shares indicated as beneficially owned by the listed person or group and dividing that number by the sum of (a) the number of issued and outstanding shares in each series or the combined series, as applicable, plus (b) the number of shares of each series or the combined series, as applicable, that the person or group may purchase through the exercise of stock options or receive upon the vesting and payment of RSU awards as indicated in footnote (2) to the table. |
Stock Ownership of Other Principal Shareholders (greater than 5 percent)
No SEC filings have been made by other principal shareholders (greater than 5 percent) of A.
H. Belo common stock at the time of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Consequently, the
information in the table and footnotes below is primarily based on information contained in reports
on Schedules 13G and Forms 13F with respect to ownership of Belo Corp. common stock as of December
31, 2007 (BLC SEC Filings), adjusted to give effect for the subsequent distribution by Belo Corp.
of all of the issued and outstanding shares of A. H. Belo common stock, and assuming there are no
changes in any such persons holdings since December 31, 2007. Based on information in the
56
Table of Contents
BLC SEC filings or otherwise available to the Company, the Company believes that the entities
listed below are likely other principal shareholders of A. H. Belo.
Shares of A. H. Belo Common Stock Beneficially Owned
And Percentage of Outstanding Shares as of December 31, 2007(1) (2)
(except as noted in footnotes below)
And Percentage of Outstanding Shares as of December 31, 2007(1) (2)
(except as noted in footnotes below)
Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A | Series B | Series A and Series B | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Address | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | Number | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
GoldenTree Asset Management LP / GoldenTree Asset Management LLC / Steven A. Tananbaum (3) |
1,272,497 | 7.2 | % | | * | * | 1,272,497 | 6.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
300 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
SAB Capital Advisors, L.L.C./ SAB Capital Management LP/ SAB Capital Management, L.L.C./ Scott A. Bommer (4) |
1,236,127 | 7.0 | % | | * | * | 1,236,127 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
767 Fifth Avenue, 21st Floor New York, NY 10153 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allianz
Global Investors of America, LLC/ Allianz Global Investors Managed Accounts LLC/NFJ Investment Group L.P. (5) |
1,193,307 | 6.8 | % | | * | * | 1,193,307 | 5.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
800 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92600 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
LSV Asset Management (6) One North Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 |
947,462 | 5.4 | % | | * | * | 947,462 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Barclays Global Investors, N.A. / Barclays Global Fund Advisors / Barclays Global Investors, Ltd. (7) |
894,652 | 5.1 | % | | * | * | 894,652 | 4.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
45 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (8) |
888,799 | 5.0 | % | | * | * | 888,799 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
1299 Ocean Avenue Santa Monica, CA 90401 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
John L. (Jack) Sander (9) |
6,044 | * | * | 190,000 | 6.2 | % | 196,044 | * | * | |||||||||||||||
10751 E.
Cottontail Lane Scottsdale, AZ 85255 |
** | Less than 1 percent | |
(1) | Series B shares are convertible at any time on a share-for share basis into Series A shares but not vice versa. For purposes of determining the number of Series A shares beneficially owned by the persons listed, the person may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the Series A shares into which the Series B shares owned are convertible. The numbers listed in the Series A column, however, do not reflect the Series A shares that may be deemed to be beneficially owned by the person listed because of this convertibility feature. | |
(2) | Pursuant to SEC rules, the percentages above are calculated by taking the number of shares indicated as beneficially owned by the listed person or group and dividing that number by the sum of (a) the number of issued and outstanding shares in each series or the combined series, as applicable, plus (b) the number of shares of each series or the combined series, as applicable, that the person or group may purchase through the exercise of stock options as indicated in the notes to the table. | |
(3) | Based upon information contained in their report on Schedule 13G with respect to Belo Corp. Series A common stock, as filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008, GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GoldenTree Asset Management LLC and Steven A. Tananbaum share voting and dispositive power with respect to all of these shares. | |
(4) | Based upon information contained in their report on Schedule 13G with respect to Belo Corp. Series A common stock, as filed with the SEC on January 24, 2008, as of the date of such filing SAB Capital Advisors, L.L.C., SAB Capital Management LP, SAB Capital Management, L.L.C., and Scott A. Bommer share voting and dispositive power with respect to all of these shares, which are held as follows: 894,827 shares held by SAB Capital Partners, L.P. (SAB); 17,836 shares held by SAB Capital Partners II, L.P. (SAB II); and 323,463 shares held by SAB Overseas Master Fund, L.P. (Master Fund). Each of SAB, SAB II, and Master Fund share voting and dispositive power with respect to the Series A shares held by them. | |
(5) | Based upon information regarding ownership of Belo Corp. securities contained in their report on Form 13F for the calendar quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008, (a) NFJ Investment Group L.P. shares investment authority with respect to 1,106,600 of these shares and has sole voting authority with respect to 553,300 of these shares and (b) Allianz Global Investors of America, LLC shares voting and dispositive power with respect to 86,707 of these shares. | |
(6) | Based upon information regarding ownership of Belo Corp. securities contained in their report on Form 13F for the calendar quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC on February 7, 2008, LSV Asset Management shares investment authority with respect to 2,700 of these shares and has sole voting authority with respect to 601,384 of these shares. |
57
Table of Contents
(7) | Based upon information contained in their report on Schedule 13G with respect to Belo Corp. Series A common stock, as filed with the SEC on February 5, 2008, Barclays Global Investors, N.A. has sole voting power with respect to 402,245 of these shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 472,626 of these shares; Barclays Global Fund Advisors has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 420,886 of these shares; and Barclays Global Investors, Ltd. has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,140 of these shares. | |
(8) | Based upon information contained in its report on Schedule 13G with respect to Belo Corp. Series A common stock, as filed with the SEC on February 6, 2008, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to these 888,799 shares. | |
(9) | John L. (Jack) Sander is a former Vice Chairman of Belo Corp. As of March 15, 2008, his holdings included 190,000 A. H. Belo. Series B Shares that could be purchased by the exercise of stock options issued to him in the distribution. If his Series A total included shares into which his Series B shares held are convertible, he would be deemed to be the beneficial owner of less than 1.1 percent of the Series A shares. |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
There
were no shares of Series A or Series B common stock
authorized for issuance under A. H. Belos equity compensation
plans as of December 31, 2007. A. H. Belos
equity compensation plans were adopted on January 11, 2008.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
A. H. Belo has adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which sets forth A. H.
Belos policy that all directors, officers, and employees avoid business and personal situations
that may give rise to a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest under the code will occur
when an individuals private interest significantly interferes or appears to significantly
interfere with A. H. Belos interest. The Code provides that the Audit Committee (or its designee)
is generally responsible for enforcement of the Code relating to members of the Board of Directors;
and A. H. Belos Management Committee (or its designee) is generally responsible for enforcement of
the Code relating to officers and employees.
The
A. H. Belo Board has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy and Procedures
pursuant to which significant transactions involving the Company and related persons, as defined in
Item 404(a) and accompanying instructions of Regulation S-K, are subject to review by the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In determining whether to approve or ratify a
related person transaction, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take into
account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the related person transaction is on
terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the
same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related persons interest in the transaction.
The Company is not aware of any other related person transactions that would require disclosure.
In
connection with the spin-off, Belo and A. H. Belo entered
into a Separation and Distribution Agreement, a Services Agreement, a
Tax Matters Agreement and an Employee Matters Agreement, effective as
of the distribution date. Belos Dallas/Fort Worth television
station, WFAA-TV, and The Dallas Morning News, owned by
A. H. Belo, entered into agreements whereby each agrees to
provide media content, cross-promotion and other services to the
other on a mutually agreed-upon basis. Robert Decherd is chairman of
the Board, president and Chief Executive Officer of
A. H. Belo, and chairman of the Board of Belo. Jim Moroney,
executive vice president of A. H. Belo and Publisher and
Chief Executive Officer of The Dallas Morning News, is an
executive officer of A. H. Belo and a director of Belo.
Dealey Herndon is a director of both Belo and A. H. Belo. Mr. Decherd and
Dealey D. Herndon, his sister serve as directors of A.H. Belo and Belo. James M. Moroney, III,
executive vice president of A.H. Belo and the Publisher and Chief Executive Officer of The Dallas
Morning New, is their second cousin.
58
Table of Contents
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Prior to the distribution of our common stock on February 8, 2008, all fees for services performed
by Ernst & Young LLP for Belo and its subsidiaries were billed to, and paid for by Belo. Belo then
allocated these fees to its subsidiaries, including the Company.
Audit
Fees. The aggregate fees allocated to the Company by Belo for professional services rendered
by Ernst & Young LLP for audit services in preparation of annual and quarterly SEC filings were
$1,075 for fiscal 2007 and $773 for fiscal 2006. We have
approved the payment of up to $100,000 to Ernst & Young LLP in connection with the audit of our
financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Audit-Related Fees. No fees were allocated to the Company by Belo for professional services
rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for audit-related services.
Tax Fees. The aggregate fees allocated to the Company by Belo for professional services rendered by
Ernst & Young LLP in connection with general tax compliance and tax consulting on various matters
were $207 in fiscal 2007 and $175 in fiscal 2006.
The
Audit Committee has adopted a policy and procedures that set forth
the manner in which the Audit Committee will review and approve all
services to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP before the firm is
retained to provide such services. The policy requires Audit
Committee pre-approval of the terms and fees of the annual audit
services engagement, as well as any changes in terms and fees
resulting from changes in audit scope or other items. The Audit
Committee also pre-approves, on an annual basis, other audit services,
and audit-related and tax services set forth in the policy, subject
to estimated fee levels pre-approved by the committee. Any other
services to be provided by the independent auditors must be
separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee. In addition, if the
fees for any pre-approved services are expected to exceed by
5 percent or more the estimated fee levels previously approved
by the Audit Committee, the
services must be separately pre-approved by the committee. As a
general guideline, annual fees paid to the independent auditors for
services other than audit, audit-related, and tax services should not
exceed one-half the dollar amounts of fees to be paid for these three
categories of services collectively. The Audit Committee has
delegated to the committee chairman and other committee members the
authority to pre-approve services in amounts up to $500 per
engagement. Services pre-approved pursuant to delegated authority must
be reported to the full committee at its next scheduled meeting. The
Chief Financial Officer reports periodically to the Audit Committee
on the status of pre-approved services, including projected fees.
All
services provided by and all fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP prior to
February 8, 2008 were approved by the Belo Audit Committee in
accordance with Belos pre-approval policy. All services
provided by and all fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP subsequent to
February 8, 2008 have been approved by our Audit Committee in
accordance with our pre-approval policy.
59
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) | The financial statements listed in the Index to Financial Statements included in the table of contents are filed as part of this report. | |
(2) | The financial schedules required by Regulation S-X are either not applicable or are included in the information provided in the Combined Financial Statements or related Notes, which are filed as part of this report. | |
(3) | Exhibits | |
Exhibits marked with an asterisk (*) are incorporated by reference to documents previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as indicated. All other documents are filed with this report. Exhibits marked with a tilde (~) are management contracts, compensatory plan contracts or arrangements filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. |
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Description | |||||
2.1 | * | Separation and Distribution Agreement by and between Belo Corp. and A. H. Belo Corporation dated
as of February 8, 2008 (Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2008 (Securities and Exchange Commission File
No. 001-33741) (the February 12, 2008 Form 8-K)) |
||||
3.1 | * | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 3
to the Companys Form 10 dated January 18, 2008 (Securities and Exchange Commission File No.
001-33741) (the Third Amendment to Form 10)) |
||||
3.3 | * | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company dated
January 11, 2008 (Exhibit 3.2 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form 10 dated January 31, 2008
(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-33741)) |
||||
3.4 | * | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective January 11, 2008 (Exhibit 3.3 to the Third
Amendment to Form 10) |
||||
4.1 | Certain rights of the holders of the Companys Common Stock are set forth in Exhibits 3.1-3.3 above |
|||||
4.2 | * | Specimen Form of Certificate representing shares of the Companys Series A Common Stock (Exhibit
4.2 to the Third Amendment to Form 10) |
||||
4.3 | * | Specimen Form of Certificate representing shares of the Companys Series B Common Stock (Exhibit
4.3 to the Third Amendment to Form 10) |
||||
4.4 | * | Rights Agreement dated as of January 11, 2008 between the Company and Mellon Investor Services LLC
(Exhibit 4.4 to the Third Amendment to Form 10) |
||||
10.1 | Financing agreements: |
|||||
(1)* Credit Agreement dated as of February 4, 2008 among the Company, as Borrower, JPMorgan
Chase, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC,
as Joint Lead Arrangers and Bookrunners, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, SunTrust
Bank and Capitol One Bank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agents (Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2008
(Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 001-33741)) |
60
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Description | |||||
10.2 | Compensatory plans: |
|||||
~ | (1)* A. H. Belo Corporation Savings Plan (Exhibit 10.4 to the February 12, 2008 Form 8-K) |
|||||
~ | (2)* A. H. Belo Corporation 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (Exhibit 10.5 to the
February 12,
2008 Form 8-K) |
|||||
~ | (3)* A. H. Belo
Pension Transition Supplement Restoration Plan effective January 1, 2008 (Exhibit
10.6 to the February 12, 2008 Form 8-K) |
|||||
~ | (4)* A. H. Belo Corporation Change In Control Severance Plan (Exhibit 10.7 to the
February 12,
2008 Form 8-K) |
|||||
10.3 | Agreements relating to the distribution of A. H. Belo: |
|||||
(1)* Tax Matters Agreement by and between Belo Corp. and A. H. Belo Corporation dated as of
February 8, 2008 (Exhibit 10.1 to the February 12, 2008 Form 8-K) |
||||||
(2)* Employee Matters Agreement by and between Belo Corp. and A. H. Belo Corporation dated as of
February 8, 2008 (Exhibit 10.2 to the February 12, 2008 Form 8-K) |
||||||
(3)* Services Agreement by and between Belo Corp. and A. H. Belo Corporation dated as of February
8, 2008 (Exhibit 10.3 to the February 12, 2008 Form 8-K) |
||||||
(4)*
Separation and Distribution Agreement
(See Exhibit 2.1 to the February 12, 2008 Form 8-K) |
||||||
12 | Statements re: Computation of Ratios |
|||||
21 | Subsidiaries
of the Company |
|||||
23 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP |
|||||
24 | Power of Attorney (set forth on the signature page(s) hereof) |
|||||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||||
32 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||||
99.1 | Independence
Standards excerpted from A.H. Belo Corporation Corporate Governance
Guidelines |
61
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
A. H. BELO CORPORATION |
||||
By: | /s/ Robert W. Decherd | |||
Robert W. Decherd | ||||
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Dated: March 31, 2008 | ||||
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The
undersigned hereby constitute and appoint Robert W. Decherd,
Donald F. Cass, Jr and Alison K. Engel, and each
of them and their substitutes, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact with full power to execute in
our name and behalf in the capacities indicated below any and all amendments to this report and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby ratify and confirm all that such attorneys-in-fact,
or any of them, or their substitutes shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated:
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Robert W. Decherd
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | March 31, 2008 | ||
/s/ Louis E. Caldera
|
Director | March 31, 2008 | ||
/s/ Douglas G. Carlston
|
Director | March 31, 2008 | ||
/s/ Dealey D. Herndon
|
Director | March 31, 2008 | ||
/s/ Laurence E. Hirsch
|
Director | March 31, 2008 | ||
/s/ J. McDonald Williams
|
Director | March 31, 2008 | ||
/s/ Alison K. Engel
|
Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) | March 31, 2008 | ||
/s/ George F. Finfrock
|
Vice President/Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) | March 31, 2008 |
62
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
A.H. Belo Corporation
A.H. Belo Corporation
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of A. H. Belo Corporation (A. H. Belo) as of
December 31, 2007. This balance sheet is the responsibility of A.H. Belos management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this balance sheet based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of A. H. Belos internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting
as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of A. H. Belos internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the balance sheet referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of A. H. Belo Corporation as of December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 27, 2008
March 27, 2008
63
Table of Contents
Assets |
||||
Cash |
$ | 1,000 | ||
$ | 1,000 | |||
Shareholders Equity |
||||
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding |
$ | 10 | ||
Additional paid-in capital |
990 | |||
$ | 1,000 | |||
See accompanying Note to Balance Sheet.
64
Table of Contents
On October 1, 2007, Belo
Corp. (Belo) announced a plan to distribute its newspaper
businesses and related assets to its shareholders to create a separate public company. On October 1, 2007,
Belo also formed a new, wholly-owned subsidiary, A. H. Belo Corporation (A. H. Belo), to serve as
the holding company for its newspaper businesses and related assets. A. H. Belo was initially
capitalized for $1,000 and issued 1,000 shares of its common stock, at $0.01 par value per share,
to a subsidiary of Belo. The accompanying balance sheet presents the financial position of A. H.
Belo as of December 31, 2007. Statements of operations and cash flows for the period from October
1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 have been omitted as there were no operations or other cash flow
activities during this period. Cash represents amounts on deposit with a banking institution.
On January 18,
2008, A. H. Belos certificate of incorporation was amended to increase the
number of authorized shares to 127,000,000 shares, of which 2,000,000 shares were designated
preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, and 125,000,000 shares were designated common stock, par
value $.01 per share (Common Stock). Of the authorized shares of Common Stock, 90,000,000 shares
were designated as Series A Common Stock, and 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock were designated as
Series B Common Stock. The Series A and Series B shares are identical except as noted herein.
Series B shares are entitled to 10 votes per share on all matters submitted to a vote of
shareholders, while the Series A shares are entitled to one vote per share. Series B shares are
convertible at any time on a one-for-one basis into Series A shares but Series A shares are not
convertible into Series B shares. Following the distribution discussed below, shares of A. H.
Belos Series A common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE symbol: AHC). There is
no established public trading market for shares of Series B common stock. Transferability of the
Series B shares is limited to family members and affiliated entities of the holder. Upon any other
type of transfer, the Series B shares automatically convert into Series A shares.
On
February 8, 2008, Belo contributed all of its subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper business
and related assets and liabilities to A. H. Belo. The assets and liabilities transferred to A. H.
Belo were recorded at historical cost as a reorganization of entities under common control in
the first quarter of 2008.
On February 8, 2008, Belo settled or assigned intercompany indebtedness between and among Belo
and its subsidiaries, including Belos subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper business and related
assets. Belo settled accounts through contributions of such indebtedness to the capital of the
debtor subsidiaries, distributions by creditor subsidiaries, and other non-cash transfers, or
assigned such notes to A. H. Belo. As of the effective time of the distribution, Belo had
contributed to the capital of A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries the net intercompany indebtedness
owed to Belo by A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries and A. H. Belo assumed the indebtedness owed by
Belo to the A. H. Belo subsidiaries.
On February 8, 2008, the distribution was completed in the form of a pro-rata dividend to
Belos shareholders of 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series A common stock for every share of Belo Series
A common stock, and 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock for every share of Belo Series
B common stock owned as of the close of business on January 25, 2008. As a result of the
distribution, A. H. Belo issued 17,603,244 shares of Series A common stock and 2,848,628 shares of
Series B common stock.
On February 8, 2008, as a consequence of the distribution, A. H. Belo became a separate public
company. Belo has no further ownership interest in A. H. Belo or in any newspaper or related
businesses, and A. H. Belo has no ownership interest in Belo or in any television station or
related businesses. A. H. Belos relationship with Belo is now governed by a separation and
distribution agreement and several ancillary agreements with Belo governing various relationships
between A. H. Belo and Belo. Belo and A. H. Belo also co-own certain downtown
Dallas, Texas, real-estate used in their respective businesses.
65
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
A. H. Belo Corporation
A. H. Belo Corporation
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of the A. H. Belo Businesses (as defined
in Note 1, the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related combined statements of
operations, Belo Corp.s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We
were not engaged to perform an audit of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the combined financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company
changed its method of accounting for share-based compensation.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the combined financial position of the A. H. Belo Businesses at December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the combined results of their operations and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 27, 2008
March 27, 2008
66
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO BUSINESSES
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Net Operating Revenues |
||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 600,335 | $ | 674,140 | $ | 687,140 | ||||||
Circulation |
112,635 | 116,265 | 104,790 | |||||||||
Other |
25,698 | 27,328 | 30,414 | |||||||||
Total net operating revenues |
738,668 | 817,733 | 822,344 | |||||||||
Operating Costs and Expenses |
||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
297,630 | 322,947 | 306,690 | |||||||||
Other production, distribution and operating costs |
259,231 | 258,076 | 226,438 | |||||||||
Newsprint, ink and other supplies |
102,501 | 132,775 | 141,901 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
344,424 | | | |||||||||
Depreciation |
45,815 | 39,996 | 39,608 | |||||||||
Amortization |
6,499 | 6,582 | 6,614 | |||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
1,056,100 | 760,376 | 721,251 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
(317,432 | ) | 57,357 | 101,093 | ||||||||
Other Income and Expense |
||||||||||||
Interest expense on notes payable to Belo Corp. |
(34,834 | ) | (31,814 | ) | (23,661 | ) | ||||||
Other income, net |
3,767 | 1,504 | 748 | |||||||||
Total other income and expense |
(31,067 | ) | (30,310 | ) | (22,913 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) |
||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(348,499 | ) | 27,047 | 78,180 | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(1,487 | ) | 11,868 | 30,361 | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (347,012 | ) | $ | 15,179 | $ | 47,819 | |||||
See accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
67
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO BUSINESSES
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets
December 31, | ||||||||
In thousands | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments |
$ | 6,874 | $ | 10,521 | ||||
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $4,596
and $4,381 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively) |
90,792 | 100,817 | ||||||
Inventories |
11,407 | 20,926 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,744 | 4,738 | ||||||
Prepaids and other current assets |
8,202 | 8,154 | ||||||
Total current assets |
122,019 | 145,156 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
||||||||
Land |
46,403 | 46,518 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
232,267 | 177,490 | ||||||
Publishing equipment |
351,323 | 324,438 | ||||||
Other |
144,503 | 142,235 | ||||||
Advance payments on property, plant and equipment |
23,614 | 81,645 | ||||||
Total property, plant and equipment |
798,110 | 772,326 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
490,322 | 459,839 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
307,788 | 312,487 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
40,426 | 46,925 | ||||||
Goodwill |
119,667 | 464,091 | ||||||
Other assets |
29,810 | 26,156 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 619,710 | $ | 994,815 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
68
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO BUSINESSES
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
Liabilities and Belo Corp.s Equity
December 31, | ||||||||
In thousands | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 25,384 | $ | 29,041 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
31,161 | 31,262 | ||||||
Accrued interest on notes payable to Belo Corp. |
35,148 | 31,802 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
3,822 | 1,358 | ||||||
Advance subscription payments |
24,495 | 24,476 | ||||||
Current portion of notes payable to Belo Corp. |
392 | 932 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
120,402 | 118,871 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19,189 | 31,378 | ||||||
Notes payable to Belo Corp. |
378,916 | 353,893 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
14,263 | 9,446 | ||||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
||||||||
Belo Corp.s equity |
86,940 | 481,227 | ||||||
Total liabilities and Belo Corp.s equity |
$ | 619,710 | $ | 994,815 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements
69
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO BUSINESSES
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF BELO CORP.S EQUITY
Three years ended December 31, 2007
Dollars in thousands | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
$ | 482,304 | ||
Dividends and other distributions |
(58,332 | ) | ||
Net earnings |
47,819 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
471,791 | |||
Dividends and other distributions |
(5,743 | ) | ||
Net earnings |
15,179 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
481,227 | |||
Dividends and other distributions |
(47,275 | ) | ||
Net loss |
(347,012 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
$ | 86,940 | ||
See accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
70
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO BUSINESSES
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash Provided (Used)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
In thousands | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Operations |
||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (347,012 | ) | $ | 15,179 | $ | 47,819 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net
cash provided by operations: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
52,314 | 46,578 | 46,222 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
344,424 | | | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(12,196 | ) | (12,679 | ) | (5,062 | ) | ||||||
Employee retirement benefit expense (credit) |
316 | (346 | ) | 150 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation |
2,316 | 1,691 | | |||||||||
Other non-cash expenses |
370 | 637 | (1,688 | ) | ||||||||
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
9,810 | 3,131 | (7,577 | ) | ||||||||
Inventories, prepaids and other current assets |
9,360 | 427 | (3,522 | ) | ||||||||
Other assets |
263 | 338 | 1,650 | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
(3,657 | ) | (11,935 | ) | 8,862 | |||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
(101 | ) | (135 | ) | 433 | |||||||
Other accrued expenses |
5,921 | 7,595 | 4,276 | |||||||||
Advance subscription payments |
19 | (984 | ) | (357 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operations |
62,147 | 49,497 | 91,206 | |||||||||
Investments |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures, net |
(41,117 | ) | (68,356 | ) | (52,860 | ) | ||||||
Investment in joint venture |
| | (9,100 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net |
(1,885 | ) | 3,041 | 565 | ||||||||
Net cash used for investments |
(43,002 | ) | (65,315 | ) | (61,395 | ) | ||||||
Financing |
||||||||||||
Dividends and distributions |
(47,275 | ) | (5,781 | ) | (53,655 | ) | ||||||
Net borrowings from Belo Corp. |
24,483 | 20,680 | 26,312 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing |
(22,792 | ) | 14,899 | (27,343 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
temporary cash investments |
(3,647 | ) | (919 | ) | 2,468 | |||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of year |
10,521 | 11,440 | 8,972 | |||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of year |
$ | 6,874 | $ | 10,521 | $ | 11,440 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosures |
||||||||||||
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 31,488 | $ | 23,656 | $ | 16,902 | ||||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
$ | 8,964 | $ | 23,951 | $ | 43,359 | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
71
Table of Contents
A. H. BELO BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A) | Description of Business and Basis of Presentation On October 1, 2007, Belo Corp. (Belo) announced a plan to distribute its newspaper publishing business to its shareholders to create a separate public company. On February 8, 2008, Belo contributed all of the stock of its subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper businesses and related assets to A. H. Belo Corporation (A. H. Belo or the Company). On February 8, 2008, Belo also distributed, through a pro-rata, tax-free dividend to its shareholders, 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series A common stock for every share of Belo Series A common stock, and 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock for every share of Belo Series B common stock owned as of the close of business on January 25, 2008. This resulted in A. H. Belo becoming a separate public company with its own management and board of directors. The assets and liabilities transferred to A. H. Belo will be recorded at historical cost as a reorganization of entities under common control in the first quarter of 2008. Following the distribution Belo does not have any ownership interest in A. H. Belo but will continue to conduct business with A. H. Belo pursuant to various inter-company agreements which are discussed in Note 13. | |
The combined financial statements include the accounts of Belo comprising its newspaper and related businesses (the A. H. Belo Businesses). Operating expenses reflect direct expenses of the business together with allocations of certain Belo corporate expenses. The allocations from Belo include certain costs associated with Belos corporate facilities, information systems, legal, internal audit, finance (including public company accounting and reporting), employee compensation and benefits administration, risk management, treasury administration and tax functions and were based on actual costs incurred by Belo. Costs allocated to the Company totaled $57,350, $55,307, and $32,864 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Allocations of corporate facility costs are based on the actual space utilized. Information technology costs and employee compensation and benefits administration are allocated based on headcount. Other costs are allocated to us based on our size relative to the Belo subsidiaries. The Company believes that these cost allocations are reasonable for the services provided. Belos various operating units currently share content at no cost. Transactions between the companies comprising the Company have been eliminated in the combined financial statements. | ||
The Company owns three primary daily newspapers, The Dallas Morning News, The Providence Journal, and The Press-Enterprise. They provide local, state, national, and international news. In addition to these three daily newspapers, the Company publishes various niche products in the same or nearby markets where the primary daily newspapers are published. Each of the Companys daily newspapers and niche publications operates and maintains its own Web site. The Company also operates direct mail and commercial printing businesses. | ||
All dollar amounts are in thousands, unless otherwise indicated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. | ||
B) | Cash and Temporary Cash Investments The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less to be temporary cash investments. Such temporary cash investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. | |
C) | Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable are net of a valuation reserve that represents an estimate of amounts considered uncollectible. The Company has estimated the allowance for doubtful accounts using historical net write-offs of uncollectible accounts. The Company analyzed the ultimate collectibility of the accounts receivable after one year, using a regression analysis of the historical net write-offs to determine the amount of those accounts receivable that were ultimately not collected. The results of this analysis were then applied to the current accounts receivable to determine the allowance necessary for that period. Our policy is to write off accounts after all collection efforts have failed; generally, amounts past due by more than one year have been written off. Expense for such |
72
Table of Contents
uncollectible amounts is included in other production, distribution and operating costs. The carrying value of accounts receivable approximates fair value. The following table shows the expense for uncollectible accounts and accounts written off, net of recoveries, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005: |
Expense for | Accounts | |||||||
Uncollectible | Written | |||||||
Accounts | Off | |||||||
2007 |
$ | 5,982 | $ | 5,767 | ||||
2006 |
$ | 5,181 | $ | 6,231 | ||||
2005 |
$ | 5,085 | $ | 3,433 | ||||
D) | Risk Concentration Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily accounts receivable. The Company maintains an allowance for losses based upon the expected collectibility of accounts receivable. A significant portion of the Companys customer base is concentrated within the local geographical area of each newspaper. The Company generally extends credit to customers, and the ultimate collection of accounts receivable could be affected by the local economy. Management performs continuous credit evaluations of its customers and may require cash in advance or other special arrangements from certain customers. Management does not believe that there is any significant credit risk that could have a material effect on the Companys financial condition. | |
E) | Inventories Inventories, consisting primarily of newsprint, ink and other supplies used in printing newspapers, are stated at the lower of average cost or market value (first-in, first-out method). Newsprint inventory varies from approximately a 30-day to 45-day supply, depending on availability and market conditions. Damaged newsprint is generally returned to the manufacturer or supplier within 30 days for a full credit. Obsolete inventory is generally not a factor. | |
F) | Property, Plant and Equipment Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: |
Estimated | ||||
Useful Lives | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
5-30 years | |||
Newspaper publishing equipment |
3-20 years | |||
Other |
3-10 years | |||
The Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by comparison of the carrying amount to the future net cash flows the property and equipment is expected to generate. Based on this assessment, no impairment was recorded in any of the periods presented. | ||
G) | Intangible Assets and Goodwill The Companys intangible assets and goodwill result from its significant business acquisitions, which occurred prior to 1998. In connection with these acquisitions, the Company obtained appraisals of the significant assets purchased. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. | |
Prior to January 1, 2002, all of the acquired intangible assets were classified together as goodwill and intangible assets in the Companys combined financial statements and were amortized over a composite life of 40 years. On January 1, 2002, upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company ceased amortization of its goodwill. |
73
Table of Contents
Goodwill is tested at least annually by reporting unit for impairment. A reporting unit consists of the newspaper operations in each individual market. The impairment test for goodwill is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, the goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, a second step is performed to calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill of the individual reporting unit by deducting the fair value of all of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit from the respective fair values of the reporting unit as a whole. To the extent the calculated implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference. See Note 3 for further discussion of the goodwill impairment testing procedures and results. | ||
The Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets in assessing the fair value of its goodwill and other intangible assets. The estimates of future cash flows are based on assumptions which management believes are reasonable. However, changes in these estimates or assumptions could produce changes in the results of the impairment tests. | ||
The Companys separable intangible assets that have finite useful lives consist of subscriber lists, which continue to be amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 18 years. The Company reviews the carrying value of intangible assets for impairment at least annually or whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the carrying values is measured by comparison of the carrying amount to the future net cash flows the intangible assets are expected to generate. Based on this assessment, no impairment for the subscriber lists was recorded in any of the periods presented. | ||
H) | Revenue Recognition The Companys principal sources of revenue are the advertising space in published issues of its newspapers and on the Companys Web sites, the sale of newspapers to distributors and individual subscribers, and amounts charged to customers for direct mail and commercial printing. Newspaper advertising revenue is recorded, net of agency commissions, when the advertisements are published in the newspaper. Advertising revenues for Web sites are recorded, net of agency commissions, ratably over the period of time the advertisement is placed on Web sites. Subscription proceeds are deferred and are included in revenue on a pro-rata basis over the term of the subscriptions. Subscription revenues under buy-sell arrangements with distributors are recorded based on the net amount received from the distributor, whereas subscription revenues under fee-based delivery arrangements with distributors are recorded based on the amount received from the subscriber. Direct mail and commercial printing revenues are recorded when the products are distributed or shipped. | |
I) | Advertising Expense The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $19,184, $17,472, and $18,756 in advertising and promotion costs during 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. | |
J) | Employee Benefits Prior to the distribution, the Company participated in certain Belo benefit plans. Under these plans, the Companys portion of the cost of benefits earned by its employees during the year was expensed as earned. | |
K) | Stock-Based Compensation Prior to the distribution, the Companys employees participated in a stock-based compensation plan sponsored by Belo. The Company was charged for the stock compensation cost recorded by Belo related to its employees. Compensation expenses for Belo corporate employees that have been allocated to the Company include related stock-based compensation, where applicable. |
74
Table of Contents
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123R supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of APB 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in the financial statements. | ||
Prior to January 1, 2006, Belo accounted for the plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB 25, and related interpretations, as permitted by SFAS 123. As a result, no stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized by Belo or the Company in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 for options granted, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2006, Belo and the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized in the year ended December 31, 2006, includes: (a) compensation expense of all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123), and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R). Results for prior periods have not been restated. | ||
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, the Companys income before income taxes and net income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are $1,798 and $1,151 and $5,347 and $3,422, respectively, lower than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB 25. | ||
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings if Belo and the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to options granted to the Companys employees (including the costs for corporate employees allocated to the Company) under Belos stock option plans in all periods presented prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, the value of the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula and amortized to expense over the options vesting periods. |
2005 | ||||
Net earnings, as reported |
$ | 47,819 | ||
Less: Stock-based compensation expense for options determined
under fair value-based method, net of income taxes |
4,004 | |||
Net earnings, pro forma |
$ | 43,815 | ||
L) | Income Taxes The Companys results are included in the combined income tax returns of Belo. However, the provision for income taxes for the periods presented has been determined as if the Company had filed separate tax returns. The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. | |
M) | Use of Estimates The preparation of combined financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and |
75
Table of Contents
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the combined financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. | ||
N) | Segments The Companys operating segments are defined as its newspapers within a given market. The Company has determined that all of its operating segments meet the criteria under SFAS No. 131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information to be aggregated into one reporting segment. |
Note 2: Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS 141R
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and
measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statement to evaluate the nature and financial effects of
the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, any business combinations the Company engages in
will be recorded and disclosed following existing accounting principles until January 1, 2009. The
Company expects SFAS No. 141R will have an impact on our combined financial statements when
effective, but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms
and size of the acquisitions, if any, consummated after the effective date.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities. This statement permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities
with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is evaluating the effects of this new standard, but currently believes that adoption
will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 establishes,
among other items, a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing
a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value,
and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. SFAS 157 will be effective for financial
assets and liabilities in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and will be effective for non-financial assets and liabilities in financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the effect of the
adoption of this standard.
Note 3: Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth the Companys identifiable intangible assets, consisting of
subscriber lists that are subject to amortization:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Intangible | Carrying | Accumulated | Intangible | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Assets, Net | Amount | Amortization | Assets, Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Subscriber lists |
$ | 115,963 | $ | 75,537 | $ | 40,426 | $ | 115,963 | $ | 69,038 | $ | 46,925 | ||||||||||||
76
Table of Contents
The amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was:
2007 |
$ | 6,499 | ||
2006 |
$ | 6,582 | ||
2005 |
$ | 6,614 |
The amortization expense for each of the next five years related to intangible assets subject
to amortization at December 31, 2007, is expected to be:
2008 |
$ | 6,499 | ||
2009 |
$ | 6,499 | ||
2010 |
$ | 5,239 | ||
2011 |
$ | 5,239 | ||
2012 |
$ | 5,239 |
Goodwill as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $119,667 and $464,091,
respectively.
Based on the results of its annual impairment test of goodwill as of December 31, 2007, the
Company recognized impairment charges related to goodwill totaling $344,424 in the fourth quarter
of 2007. Of the total charge, $242,794 related to The Providence Journal, and $101,630 related to The
Press-Enterprise. The impairment charges resulted primarily from a decline in the estimated fair
value of the individual businesses due primarily to lower estimated market growth rates versus
prior year estimates and projected increases in newsprint costs. A summary of the changes in the
Companys recorded goodwill is below:
Total Goodwill | ||||
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
$ | 464,091 | ||
Goodwill impairment |
(344,424 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
$ | 119,667 | ||
Based on the annual impairment tests performed for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
there was no impairment of goodwill.
Note 4: Long-Term Incentive Plan
Prior to the distribution, the Companys employees participated in Belos long-term incentive
plan under which awards may be granted to employees and outside directors in the form of
non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units
(RSUs), performance shares, performance units or stock appreciation rights. In addition, options
may be accompanied by stock appreciation rights and limited stock appreciation rights. Rights and
limited rights may also be issued without accompanying options. Cash-based bonus awards are also
available under the plan.
Compensation
cost charged to the Company under Belos long-term incentive plan for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $9,085 and $9,070, respectively. There was no compensation
cost charged to the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005.
77
Table of Contents
Options
The non-qualified options granted to employees under Belos long-term incentive plan become
exercisable in cumulative installments over periods of one to three years and expire after ten
years. The fair value of each option award granted is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table.
Volatility is calculated using an analysis of historical volatility. Belo believes that the
historical volatility of Belos stock is the best method for estimating future volatility. The
expected lives of options are determined based on Belos historical share option exercise
experience using a rolling one-year average. Belo believes the historical experience method is the
best estimate of future exercise patterns currently available. The risk-free interest rates are
determined using the implied yield currently available for zero-coupon United States government
issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the options. The expected dividend
yields are based on the approved annual dividend rate in effect and current market price of the
underlying common stock at the time of grant.
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 6.01 | $ | 4.71 | $ | 5.89 | ||||||
Weighted average assumptions used: |
||||||||||||
Expected volatility |
27.2 | % | 24.9 | % | 26.0 | % | ||||||
Expected lives |
9 yrs | 6 yrs | 6 yrs | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rates |
4.66 | % | 4.74 | % | 4.30 | % | ||||||
Expected dividend yields |
2.51 | % | 2.54 | % | 1.81 | % |
A summary of option activity under the Belo long-term incentive plan for the three years ended
December 31, 2007, is summarized in the following table:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Number of | Exercise | Number of | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
Options | Price | Options | Price | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, |
14,757,498 | $ | 21.43 | 16,270,228 | $ | 21.17 | 16,369,928 | $ | 20.97 | |||||||||||||||
Granted |
85,237 | $ | 19.91 | 369,330 | $ | 18.60 | 1,042,860 | $ | 22.17 | |||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(709,214 | ) | $ | 17.79 | (1,581,844 | ) | $ | 17.90 | (951,810 | ) | $ | 17.90 | ||||||||||||
Canceled |
(1,648,873 | ) | $ | 25.70 | (300,216 | ) | $ | 22.61 | (190,750 | ) | $ | 25.15 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, |
12,484,648 | $ | 21.04 | 14,757,498 | $ | 21.43 | 16,270,228 | $ | 21.17 | |||||||||||||||
Vested and exercisable
at December 31, |
12,021,912 | $ | 21.05 | 13,448,418 | $ | 21.36 | 13,784,308 | $ | 20.60 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average remaining
contractual term (in years) |
4.4 | 4.9 | 5.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Options granted under the Belo long-term incentive plan are granted where the exercise price
equals the closing stock price on the day of grant therefore the options outstanding have no
intrinsic value. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December
31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
2007 |
$ | 2,085 | ||
2006 |
$ | 1,805 | ||
2005 |
$ | 5,688 |
78
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes information (net of estimated forfeitures) related to Belo
stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007:
Number of | Weighted Average | Weighted Average | Number of | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Options | Remaining | Exercise | Options | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Outstanding(a) | Life (years) | Price | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 15 - 18 | 4,608,569 | 3.28 | $ | 17.66 | 4,442,704 | $ | 17.65 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 19 - 21 | 4,223,222 | 4.21 | $ | 20.40 | 3,900,970 | $ | 20.34 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 22 - 29 | 3,638,284 | 6.13 | $ | 26.05 | 3,566,660 | $ | 26.09 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 15 - 29 | 12,470,075 | 4.43 | $ | 21.04 | 11,910,334 | $ | 21.06 |
(a) | Comprised of Series B shares |
Belo recognized stock-based compensation expense related to awards of stock options for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 of approximately $ 3,958 and $9,886, respectively, of which
$1,798 and $5,347, respectively, was charged to the Company. No expense related to awards of stock
options was recognized by Belo or the Company in 2004 and 2005. As of December 31, 2007, employees
of the Company held options to purchase 4,613,000 shares of Belo Series B shares with a weighted
average exercise price of $20.96, of which 4,099,000 of these options with a weighted average
exercise price of $20.99 were vested and exercisable. As of December 31, 2007, there was $590 of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to the Companys portion of non-vested Belo options
which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years.
In connection with the distribution of A. H. Belo on February 8, 2008, holders of outstanding
Belo options received an adjusted Belo option for the same number of shares of Belo common stock as
held before but with a reduced exercise price based on the closing price on February 8, 2008.
Holders also received one new A. H. Belo option for every five Belo options held as of the
distribution date (the distribution ratio) with an exercise price based on the closing share price
on February 8, 2008. Following the distribution, there were
2,497,000 A. H. Belo options outstanding at
the weighted average exercise price of $21.09, of which 2,404,000 options were exercisable at a weighted
average exercise price of $21.11.
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
Under Belos long-term incentive plan, its Board of Directors has awarded restricted stock
units (RSUs). The RSUs have service and/or performance conditions and vest over a period of one
to three years. Upon vesting, the RSUs will be redeemed with 60 percent in Belo Series A common stock
and 40 percent in cash. A liability has been established for the cash portion of the redemption.
During the vesting period, holders of service based RSUs and RSUs with performance conditions where
the performance conditions have been met participate in Belo dividends declared by receiving payments
for dividend equivalents. Such dividend equivalents are recorded as components of share-based
compensation. The RSUs do not have voting rights.
79
Table of Contents
A summary of RSU activity under the Belo long-term incentive plan for the three years ended
December 31, 2007, is summarized in the following table.
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Number of | Exercise | Number of | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | Price | RSUs | Price | RSUs | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, |
1,388,206 | $ | 19.53 | 364,900 | $ | 21.62 | | $ | | |||||||||||||||
Granted |
813,583 | $ | 17.18 | 1,036,756 | $ | 18.82 | 364,900 | $ | 21.62 | |||||||||||||||
Vested |
(127,863 | ) | $ | 21.36 | | $ | | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Canceled |
(125,066 | ) | $ | 19.22 | (13,450 | ) | $ | 21.31 | | $ | | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, |
1,948,860 | $ | 18.45 | 1,388,206 | $ | 19.53 | 364,900 | $ | 21.62 | |||||||||||||||
Vested at December 31, |
| | | $ | | | $ | |
The fair value of the RSUs granted is determined using the closing trading price of Belos
shares on the grant date. Belo recognized stock-based compensation expense related to awards of
RSUs of $16,239, $7,107 and $ 305 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, of which $7,287, $3,723 and $0, respectively, was charged to the Company. The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of the RSUs granted during the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, was $17.18, $18.82 and $21.62, respectively. During 2007, 127,863 RSUs
were converted into shares of stock. No RSUs were converted into shares of stock during the years
ended December 31, 2006 or 2005. As of December 31, 2007, Belo had $15,215 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs of which the Company had $5,333. The compensation
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.09 years for Belo and 2.36
years for the Company.
In connection with the distribution, the Belo RSUs were treated as if they were issued and
outstanding shares. As a result, the Belo RSUs and the A. H. Belo RSUs taken together, had the
same aggregate value based on the closing prices of the Belo stock and the A. H. Belo stock on the
distribution date, as the Belo RSUs immediately prior to the distribution.
Each stock option and RSU (of A. H. Belo and of Belo) will otherwise have the same terms as
the current award. The awards would continue to vest as under the existing vesting schedule based
on continued employment with Belo or A. H. Belo, as applicable. Following the distribution, A. H.
Belo and Belo would recognize compensation expense for any pre-distribution awards related to their
respective employees, regardless of which company ultimately issues the awards.
Note 5: Defined Contribution Plans
Prior to the distribution, the Companys employees participated in a Belo sponsored defined
contribution plan established effective October 1, 1989. The defined contribution plan covers
substantially all employees of Belo. Participants may elect to contribute a portion of their pretax
compensation as provided by the Plan and Internal Revenue Service regulations. The maximum pretax
contribution an employee can make is 100 percent of his or her annual eligible compensation (less
required withholdings and deductions) up to statutory limits. Employees participate in the defined
contribution plan under the Star Plan (for employees who did not elect to continue participation in
Belos defined benefit pension plan when it was frozen to new participants in 2000, for employees
other than members of the Providence newspaper guild, and in 2004, for members of the Providence
newspaper guild); or under the Classic Plan (for employees who elected to continue participation in
Belos defined benefit pension plan). See Note 6 for further discussions of Belos defined benefit
pension plan. Belo contributes an amount equal to two percent of the compensation paid to eligible
employees, subject to limitations, and matches a specified percentage of employees contributions
under the Star Plan. Under the Classic Plan, Belo matches a percentage of the employees
contribution but does not make the two percent contribution of the participants compensation.
80
Table of Contents
The Company was charged $9,881, $8,330, and $7,271, in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, for
contributions for its employees to Belos defined contribution plan, excluding corporate employees
whose compensation and benefits were partially allocated to the Company.
Effective as of February 8, 2008, Belo transferred the vested and non-vested account balances
of A. H. Belo employees and former employees from the Belo defined contribution plan to a defined
contribution plan established and sponsored by A. H. Belo. Effective with this transfer, A. H.
Belo assumed and became solely responsible for all liabilities of Belos defined contribution plan
with respect to A. H. Belos employees and former employees. Subsequent to the transfer, A. H.
Belo and its subsidiaries ceased to be participating employers in the Belo defined contribution
plan.
In March 2007, Belo froze benefits under the Pension Plan. See Note 6. As part of the
curtailment of the Pension Plan, the Company is providing transition benefits to affected
employees, including supplemental contributions to the Belo Pension Transition Supplement Plan, a
defined contribution plan, for a period of up to five years. As a result, during 2007, the Company
accrued supplemental pension transition contributions totaling $5,414 to this plan. These
supplemental pension transition contributions will benefit those employees affected by these
changes who remain with Belo or A. H. Belo.
Prior to February 8, 2008, A. H. Belo established the A. H. Belo Pension Transition Supplement
Plan, a defined contribution plan. Concurrent with the date that Belo will make its contribution
to its pension transition supplement defined contribution plan for the 2007 plan year, Belo will
cause the vested and non-vested account balances of A. H. Belo employees and former employees to be
transferred to the A. H. Belo Pension Transition Supplement Plan. At this time,
A. H. Belo will assume and be solely responsible for all liabilities for plan benefits of Belos
pension transition supplement defined contribution plan with respect to A. H. Belos employees and
former employees. A. H. Belo will reimburse Belo for the aggregate contribution made by Belo to
its pension transition supplement defined contribution plan for the 2007 plan year for the accounts
of A. H. Belo employees and former employees.
Belo also sponsors non-qualified defined contribution retirement plans for certain employees.
Expense recognized by the Company in 2007, 2006, and 2005 for these
plans was $1,806, $777 and $1,009, respectively. Subsequent to December 31, 2007, the plans were discontinued and balances
were transferred to the respective participants prior to the distribution of A. H. Belo.
Note 6: Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans
Prior to the distribution, some of the Companys employees participated in Belos Pension
Plan, which covers employees who elected to continue participation in the plan when it was frozen
to new participants in 2000 (for employees other than members of the Providence newspaper guild)
and in 2004 (for members of the Providence newspaper guild). The benefits are based on years of
service and the average of the employees five consecutive years of highest annual compensation
earned during the most recently completed ten years of employment. Information regarding Belos
Pension Plan is included below.
Belo froze benefits under the Pension Plan effective March 31, 2007. As part of this
curtailment of the Pension Plan, Belo and A. H. Belo are providing transition benefits to affected
employees, including the granting of five years of additional credited service under the Pension
Plan and supplemental contributions for a period of up to five years to a defined contribution
plan. As a result, the Company recorded $2,696, representing its portion of Belos curtailment
loss of $4,082 in the fourth quarter of 2006, included in salaries, wages and employee benefits in
the accompanying statement of operations, which represents the previously unrecognized prior
service cost associated with years of credited service which are now no longer expected to be
earned.
On December 31, 2006, Belo adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158.
SFAS 158 requires Belo to recognize the funded status (the difference between the fair value of
plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of its Pension Plan in the December 31, 2006
consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of tax. The adjustment
81
Table of Contents
to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption of SFAS 158 represents the remaining net
unrecognized actuarial losses as of December 31, 2006. These amounts will be subsequently
recognized as net periodic pension cost pursuant to the Companys historical accounting policy for
amortizing such amounts. Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and
which are not recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost in the same periods will be
recognized on the same basis as net actuarial losses included in accumulated other comprehensive
income at adoption of SFAS 158.
Because Belo has curtailed all benefits under the Pension Plan as discussed above, the
adoption of SFAS 158 had no effect on Belos financial position as of December 31, 2006. In
addition, the adoption of SFAS 158 had no effect on the Companys combined statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and it will not affect the Companys results of operations in
future periods.
The reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the projected benefit obligation
and the fair value of plans assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2007 and 2006, are as follows:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Funded Status |
||||||||
Projected Benefit Obligation |
||||||||
As of January 1, |
$ | 497,626 | $ | 507,443 | ||||
Actuarial gains |
(58,827 | ) | (17,603 | ) | ||||
Service cost |
1,860 | 11,343 | ||||||
Interest cost |
28,947 | 28,734 | ||||||
Plan amendments |
| 40,334 | ||||||
Curtailments |
| (54,984 | ) | |||||
Benefits paid |
(18,548 | ) | (17,641 | ) | ||||
As of December 31, |
$ | 451,058 | $ | 497,626 | ||||
Fair Value of Plan Assets |
||||||||
As of January 1, |
$ | 451,239 | $ | 410,513 | ||||
Actual return on plan assets |
20,955 | 58,367 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(18,548 | ) | (17,641 | ) | ||||
As of December 31, |
453,646 | 451,239 | ||||||
Funded Status as of December 31, |
$ | 2,588 | $ | (46,387 | ) | |||
Accumulated Benefit Obligation |
$ | 451,058 | $ | 497,626 | ||||
Amounts recognized in Belos balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Non-current prepaid pension cost |
$ | 2,588 | $ | | ||||
Accrued pension liability |
| (46,387 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
9,916 | 54,737 | ||||||
The differences between the amounts recorded as prepaid pension cost in 2007 and the
non-current pension liability in 2006 and the amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
loss are due to cumulative Company contributions in excess of net periodic pension benefit expense.
Belos pension costs and obligations are calculated using various actuarial assumptions and
methodologies as prescribed under SFAS 87. To assist in developing these assumptions and
methodologies, Belo uses the services of an independent consulting firm. To determine the benefit
obligations, the assumptions Belo uses include, but are not limited to, the selection of the
discount rate. In determining the discount rate assumption, Belo used a measurement date of
December 31, 2007 and constructed a portfolio of bonds to match the benefit payment stream that is
projected to be paid from
82
Table of Contents
Belos pension plans. The benefit payment stream is assumed to be funded from bond coupons and
maturities as well as interest on the excess cash flows from the bond portfolio. The discount rate
used to determine benefit obligations for the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, were
6.85 percent and 6.00 percent, respectively.
To compute Belos net periodic benefit cost in the year ended December 31, 2007, Belo uses
actuarial assumptions which include a discount rate, an expected long-term rate of return on plan
assets and projected salary increases. The discount rate applied in this calculation is the rate
used in computing the benefit obligation as of the end of the preceding year. The expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption is based on the weighted average expected
long-term returns for the target allocation of plan assets as of the measurement date, the end of
the year, and was developed through analysis of historical market returns, current market
conditions and the Pension Plans assets past experience. Although Belo believes that the
assumptions used are appropriate, differences between assumed and actual experience may affect the
Companys operating results.
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Discount rate |
6.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
8.50 | % | 8.50 | % | 8.75 | % | ||||||
Rate of increase in future compensation |
N/A | 4.20 | % | 4.20 | % |
The net periodic pension cost (credit) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
includes the following components:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Service cost benefits earned during the period |
$ | 1,860 | $ | 11,343 | $ | 10,862 | ||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
28,947 | 28,734 | 27,565 | |||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(36,386 | ) | (34,026 | ) | (31,139 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of net loss |
1,425 | 7,186 | 7,820 | |||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost |
| 616 | 529 | |||||||||
Recognized curtailment loss |
| 4,082 | | |||||||||
Net periodic pension cost (credit) |
$ | (4,154 | ) | $ | 17,935 | $ | 15,637 | |||||
The
Company was charged $(2,772), $11,856 and $10,432 for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, for pension costs for its employees, excluding corporate employees
whose compensation and benefits are partially allocated to the Company.
The expected benefit payments, net of administrative expenses, under the plan are as follows:
2008 |
$ | 20,545 | ||
2009 |
21,695 | |||
2010 |
22,909 | |||
2011 |
24,279 | |||
2012 |
25,823 |
Belos funding policy is to contribute annually to the Pension Plan amounts sufficient to meet
minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee benefit and tax laws, but not in excess of
the maximum tax deductible contribution. Belo made no contributions to the Pension Plan during
2007 and 2006. During 2005, the Company made contributions to the Pension Plan totaling $15,000.
The 2005 contributions exceeded Belos required minimum contribution for ERISA funding purposes and
there was no ERISA funding requirement in 2007 and 2006. No plan assets are expected to be
returned to Belo or the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
83
Table of Contents
The primary investment objective of the Pension Plan is to ensure, over the long-term life of
the plan, an adequate pool of assets to support the benefit obligations to participants, retirees
and beneficiaries. A secondary objective of the plan is to achieve a level of investment return
consistent with a prudent level of portfolio risk that will minimize the financial effect of the
Pension Plan on Belo and the Company.
The Pension Plan weighted-average target allocation and actual asset allocations at December
31, 2007 and 2006 by asset category are as follows:
Target | Actual | |||||||||||
Asset category | Allocation | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||
Domestic equity securities |
60.0 | % | 59.7 | % | 61.0 | % | ||||||
International equity securities |
15.0 | % | 18.9 | % | 19.5 | % | ||||||
Fixed income securities |
25.0 | % | 20.9 | % | 19.1 | % | ||||||
Cash |
| 0.5 | % | 0.4 | % | |||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Pension Plan assets do not include any Belo common stock at December 31, 2007 or 2006.
Subsequent to the distribution of A. H. Belo, Belo retained sponsorship of the Pension Plan
and will, jointly with A. H. Belo, administer benefits for the Belo and A. H. Belo current and
former employees who participate in the Pension Plan in accordance with the terms of the Pension
Plan. The distribution will cause each A. H. Belo employee to have a separation from service for
purposes of commencing benefits under the Pension Plan at or after age 55. As sponsor of the
Pension Plan, Belo will be solely responsible for satisfying the funding obligations with respect
to the Pension Plan and retains sole discretion to determine the amount and timing of any
contributions required to satisfy such funding obligations. Belo also retains the right, in its
sole discretion, to terminate the Pension Plan. A. H. Belo will reimburse Belo for 60 percent of
each contribution Belo makes to the Pension Plan.
Belo also sponsors post retirement benefit plans that certain of the Companys employees
participate in. Expense recognized by the Company for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 for these plans was $169, $392 and $442, respectively.
Note 7: Long-term Debt
Prior to the distribution, A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries had notes payable arrangements with
Belo, primarily to facilitate tax planning and cash management strategies. These notes accrued
interest at prime plus one percent and have various payment terms.
There were three types of notes payable to Belo:
| Revolving notes which have an upper limit up to which an entity may borrow and are payable in full at the end of each fiscal year; | ||
| Installment notes payable in ten equal annual installments on each of the ten anniversaries from the inception of the note; and | ||
| Notes payable in full on the tenth anniversary from the inception of the note. |
84
Table of Contents
Notes payable to Belo consist of the following at December 31, 2007 and 2006:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Revolving notes |
$ | 224,433 | $ | 201,432 | ||||
Installment notes |
853 | 1,785 | ||||||
Balloon notes |
154,022 | 151,608 | ||||||
Total notes payable to Belo Corp. |
379,308 | 354,825 | ||||||
Less current maturities |
392 | 932 | ||||||
Long-term portion of notes payable to Belo Corp. |
$ | 378,916 | $ | 353,893 | ||||
The weighted average effective interest rate on the notes payable was 8.5 percent and 9.25
percent at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
As of February 8, 2008, in connection with Belo Corp.s distribution of the Company, Belo
contributed to the capital of A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries the net intercompany indebtedness
owed to Belo by the Company or assigned indebtedness to the Company. This effectively settled the notes payable balances described above.
In connection with the distribution from Belo, A. H. Belo entered into a bank credit facility
agreement (the Credit Agreement) on February 4, 2008, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P.
Morgan Securities, Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and certain other
lenders party thereto. This facility may be used for future working capital needs and other
general corporate purposes, including letters of credit. The Credit Agreement consists of a $100
million senior unsecured five-year revolving credit facility. Borrowings under this agreement will
bear interest at a variable interest rate based on either LIBOR or a base rate, in either case plus
an applicable margin that varies depending upon the Companys leverage ratio.
The Credit Agreement contains a number of restrictions on the Companys business, including,
but not limited to, restrictions on the Companys (and certain of its subsidiaries) ability to
incur indebtedness; grant liens on assets; make certain restricted payments; merge, consolidate, or
sell assets; engage in transactions with affiliates; enter into restrictive agreements; enter
into sale-leaseback transactions; and to make certain investments. In addition, the Company is subject
to a leverage ratio covenant and a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant. The Credit Agreement also
contains affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross-default to certain other
debt. Failure to comply with these covenants, or the occurrence of an event of default, could
result in acceleration of the Companys debt and other financial obligations under the Credit
Agreement.
The Credit Agreement requires the Companys material subsidiaries to guarantee the obligations
of the Company under the agreement.
85
Table of Contents
Note 8: Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 consists of the
following:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 4,527 | $ | 19,478 | $ | 31,670 | ||||||
State |
5,678 | 4,085 | 4,081 | |||||||||
Total current |
10,205 | 23,563 | 35,751 | |||||||||
Deferred |
||||||||||||
Federal |
(8,259 | ) | (10,759 | ) | (5,547 | ) | ||||||
State |
(3,433 | ) | (936 | ) | 157 | |||||||
Total deferred |
(11,692 | ) | (11,695 | ) | (5,390 | ) | ||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | (1,487 | ) | $ | 11,868 | $ | 30,361 | |||||
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 differ
from amounts computed by applying the applicable United States federal income tax rate as follows:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Computed expected income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | (121,975 | ) | $ | 9,466 | $ | 27,363 | |||||
Texas margin tax adjustment | (1,896 | ) | | | ||||||||
State income taxes |
3,380 | 2,047 | 2,755 | |||||||||
Impairment charge | 120,548 | | | |||||||||
Other |
(1,544 | ) | 355 | 243 | ||||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | (1,487 | ) | $ | 11,868 | $ | 30,361 | |||||
Effective income tax expense (benefit) rate |
(0.4 | )% | 43.9 | % | 38.8 | % | ||||||
In May 2006, the Texas legislature enacted a new law that reforms the Texas franchise tax
system and replaces it with a new tax system, referred to as the Texas margin tax. The Texas margin
tax is a significant change in Texas tax law because it generally makes all legal entities subject
to tax, including general and limited partnerships, while the current franchise tax system applies
only to corporations and limited liability companies. The Company conducts some operations in Texas
that will become subject to the new Texas margin tax. The effective date of the Texas margin tax,
which has been interpreted to be an income tax for accounting purposes, is January 1, 2008 for
calendar year-end companies, and the computation of tax liability is expected to be based on 2007
revenues as reduced by certain deductions.
In accordance with provisions of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires that
deferred tax assets and liabilities be adjusted for the effects of new tax legislation in the
period of enactment, the Company recorded reductions of income tax expense of approximately $1,873
and $326 in the second quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively. The estimates were based on the
Texas margin tax law and the guidance issued by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
86
Table of Contents
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31,
2007 and 2006 are as follows:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Excess tax amortization |
$ | 16,211 | $ | 15,862 | ||||
Excess tax depreciation |
13,603 | 25,093 | ||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
29,814 | 40,955 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Deferred compensation and benefits |
5,604 | 4,548 | ||||||
State taxes |
1,524 | 1,730 | ||||||
Expenses deductible for tax purposes in
a year different from the year accrued |
5,919 | 5,913 | ||||||
Other |
2,324 | 2,124 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
15,371 | 14,315 | ||||||
Net deferred tax liability |
$ | 14,445 | $ | 26,640 | ||||
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes. FIN 48, an interpretation of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, that clarifies
the accounting and disclosure requirements for uncertainty in tax positions as defined by the
standard. In connection with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company has analyzed its filing positions
in all significant jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns for the open tax
years in such jurisdictions. The Company has identified as major tax jurisdictions, as defined, its
federal income tax return and its state income tax returns in five
states. The Companys federal income
tax returns for the years subsequent to December 31, 2002, remain subject to examination. The Companys
income tax returns in major state income tax jurisdictions where the Company operates remain
subject to examination for various periods subsequent to December 31, 2001. The Company currently believes
that all significant filing positions are highly certain and that, more likely than not, all of its
significant income tax filing positions and deductions would be sustained. Therefore, the Company
has no significant reserves for uncertain tax positions and no adjustments to such reserves were
required upon the adoption of FIN 48. If interest and penalties are assessed, interest costs will
be recognized in interest expense and penalties will be recognized in operating expenses.
Note 9: Commitments
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had contractual obligations for capital expenditures that
primarily relate to newspaper production equipment and leases. The table below summarizes the
following commitments of the Company as of December 31, 2007:
Nature of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitment | Total | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures and licenses |
$ | 6,568 | $ | 5,936 | $ | 632 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable operating leases |
11,895 | 5,081 | 3,459 | 1,957 | 876 | 514 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 18,463 | $ | 11,017 | $ | 4,091 | $ | 1,957 | $ | 876 | $ | 514 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Total lease expense for property and equipment was $7,534, $7,978, and $8,080 in 2007, 2006, and
2005, respectively.
87
Table of Contents
Note 10: Contingent Liabilities
In 2004, Belo announced that an internal investigation, then ongoing, disclosed practices and
procedures that led to an overstatement of previously reported circulation figures at The Dallas
Morning News, primarily in single copy sales. In response to the overstatement, Belo implemented a
voluntary advertiser plan developed by Belo management. The plan included cash payments to
advertisers and future advertising credits. Payments under the plan were made without any condition
that such advertisers release The Dallas Morning News from liability for the circulation
overstatement. To use the credits, advertisers generally placed advertising in addition to the
terms of the advertisers current contract. There are no unused credits.
On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004, and October 5, 2004, three related lawsuits were filed by
purported shareholders of Belo in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Texas against Belo, Robert W. Decherd, and Barry T. Peckham, a former executive officer of The
Dallas Morning News. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement at The Dallas
Morning News announced by Belo in 2004, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated
Belos financial results and thereby injured investors. The plaintiffs seek to represent a
purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6,
2004. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. On October 18, 2004, the court ordered the consolidation of all cases arising out of the
same facts and presenting the same claims, and on February 7, 2005, plaintiffs filed an amended,
consolidated complaint adding as defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, and Dennis A.
Williamson, all of whom are current or retired executive officers of Belo, and James M.
Moroney III, an executive officer of The Dallas Morning News. On May 18, 2007, the court partially
granted defendants motions to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint to the extent it
dismissed plaintiffs complaint as to defendants John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, and Dennis A.
Williamson. The motions to dismiss were denied as to the other defendants. On September 19, 2007,
plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification; defendants filed their response to this
motion on October 26, 2007. Plaintiffs filed their reply to the response on November 16, 2007. On
November 26, 2007, the court denied defendants motion for reconsideration of the courts denial of
defendants motion to dismiss as to the remaining defendants. No class or classes have been
certified and no amount of damages has been specified. The Company believes the complaints are
without merit and intends to defend vigorously against them.
On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual
shareholder of Belo in the 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W.
Decherd, John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson, and James M. Moroney III; Barry T.
Peckham; and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R.
Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr.,
Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak, and Arturo Madrid, current or
former directors of Belo. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of
fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News. On May 30,
2007, after a prior discovery stay ended, the court issued an order administratively closing the
case. Under the courts order, the case is stayed and, as a result, no further action can be taken
unless the case is reinstated. The court retained jurisdiction and the case is subject to being
reinstated by the court or upon motion by any party. The courts order was not a dismissal with
prejudice.
Under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement between A. H. Belo and Belo, A. H. Belo and Belo
will share equally in any liabilities, net of any applicable insurance, resulting
from the circulation-related lawsuits described above.
In 2004, the staff of the SEC notified Belo that it was conducting a newspaper industry-wide
inquiry into circulation practices, and inquired specifically about
The Dallas Morning News, circulation overstatement. Belo briefed the SEC on The Dallas
Morning News, circulation situation
and related matters. The information voluntarily provided to the SEC related to The Dallas Morning
News, as well as The
88
Table of Contents
Providence
Journal and The Press-Enterprise. On October 1, 2007,
the SEC staff
sent counsel for Belo a letter stating that the inquiry has been completed and that the SEC staff
does not intend to recommend any enforcement action by the SEC.
On October 24, 2006, eighteen former employees of The Dallas Morning News filed a lawsuit
against various A. H. Belo-related parties in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Texas. The plaintiffs lawsuit alleges unlawful discrimination and ERISA violations and
includes allegations relating to The Dallas Morning News circulation overstatement (similar to the
circulation-related lawsuits described above). In June 2007, the court issued a memorandum order
granting in part and denying in part defendants motion to dismiss. In August 2007, the court
dismissed certain additional claims. A trial date in January 2009 has been set. The Company
believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend vigorously against it.
In addition to the proceedings disclosed above, a number of other legal proceedings are
pending against A. H. Belo, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the
opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not
have a material adverse effect on A. H. Belos results of operations, liquidity, or financial
position.
Note 11: Reduction in Force
On September 14, 2006, the Company completed a voluntary severance program for newsroom
employees at The Dallas Morning News. The voluntary severance affected approximately 112 positions.
The total charge for severance costs and other expenses related to this reduction in workforce was
approximately $6,491, which was recorded and paid in 2006. In April 2006, the Company announced its
technology optimization initiative. Part of this initiative is the elimination of approximately 60
positions. The total charge for severance costs and other expenses related to this initiative is
expected to be approximately $1,742, of which $1,688 was recorded in 2006. Approximately $1,388 of
the technology initiative charges were recorded by the Company, with the remaining amount recorded
as Belo corporate expenses. Of the $1,688 in charges recorded in salaries, wages and employee
benefits as of December 31, 2006, approximately $1,627 was paid in 2006. As of December 31, 2007,
all the remaining amounts due have been paid.
Note 12: Related Party Transactions
In December 2005, Belo Corp. entered into a construction contract with Austin Commercial, L.P.
relating to The Dallas Morning News distribution and production center in southern Dallas. As of
December 31, 2007, all amounts relating to the contract have been paid and the contract is now
complete. The contract provided for total payments of approximately $16,055, of which
approximately $2,338 and $13,162 were paid during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Bill Solomon, a member of Belos Board of Directors, was Chairman of Austin
Industries, Inc., the parent company of Austin Commercial, L.P, at the time the contract commenced.
Note 13: Subsequent Events
On October 1, 2007, Belo announced a plan to distribute its newspaper business and related assets and liabilities to
its shareholders to create a separate public company. On February 8, 2008, Belo contributed all of
its subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper business and related assets and liabilities to A. H. Belo.
On February 8, 2008, Belo also settled or assigned intercompany indebtedness between and among
Belo and its subsidiaries, including Belos subsidiaries engaged in the newspaper business and
related assets. Belo settled accounts through contributions of such indebtedness to the capital of
the debtor subsidiaries, distributions by creditor subsidiaries, and other non-cash transfers, or
assigned such notes to A. H. Belo. As of the effective time of the distribution, Belo had
contributed to the capital of A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries the net intercompany indebtedness
owed to Belo by A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries and A. H. Belo assumed the indebtedness owed by
Belo to the A. H. Belo subsidiaries.
89
Table of Contents
On February 8, 2008, the distribution was completed in the form of a pro-rata dividend to
Belos shareholders shares of 0.20 A. H. Belo Series A common stock for every share of Belo Series
A common stock, and 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock for every share of Belo Series
B common stock owned as of the close of business on January 25, 2008. As a result of the
distribution, A. H. Belo issued 17,603,244 shares of Series A common stock and 2,848,628 shares of
Series B common stock.
On February 8, 2008, as a consequence of the distribution, A. H. Belo became a separate public
company. Belo has no further ownership interest in A. H. Belo or in any newspaper or related
businesses, and A. H. Belo has no ownership interest in Belo or in any television station or
related businesses. A. H. Belos relationship with Belo is now
governed by a series of agreements governing various
relationships between A. H. Belo and Belo described below. Belo and A. H. Belo also co-own certain downtown
Dallas, Texas real-estate.
In connection with the distribution, the Company entered into a separation and distribution
agreement, a services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, and other
agreements with Belo. In the separation and distribution agreement, effective as of the
distribution date, A. H. Belo and Belo will indemnify each other and certain related parties, from
all liabilities existing or arising from acts and events occurring, or failing to occur (or alleged
to have occurred or to have failed to occur) regarding each others businesses, whether occurring
before, at or after the effective time of the distribution; provided, however, that under the terms
of the separation and distribution agreement, the Company and Belo will share equally in any
liabilities, net of any applicable insurance, resulting from the circulation-related lawsuits
described in the Note 10.
Under the services agreement, Belo (or its subsidiaries) will provide the following services
and/or support to A. H. Belo: legal and government affairs; certain human resources activities; and
payroll and other specified financial management activities. Similarly, A. H. Belo (or its
subsidiaries) will provide the following services and/or support to Belo: information technology;
interactive media; certain employee benefit plan administration; real estate management; and other
specified operations activities. The services will generally be provided for a term beginning on
the distribution date and expiring on the earlier of the second anniversary of the distribution
date or the date of termination of a particular service pursuant to the agreement. The party
receiving a service can generally terminate provision of that service upon 90 days advance notice
to the party providing the service. Payments made or other consideration provided in connection
with all continuing transactions between the Company and Belo will be on a basis arrived at by the
parties bargaining at arms-length or with respect to services not inconsistent with the business
purpose of the parties.
The tax matters agreement sets out each partys rights and obligations with respect to
payment deficiencies and refunds, if any, of federal, state, local, or foreign taxes for periods before and
after the distribution and related matters such as the filing of tax returns and the conduct of IRS
and other audits. Under this agreement, Belo will be responsible for all income taxes prior to the
distribution, except that A. H. Belo will be responsible for its share of income taxes paid on a
consolidated basis for the period of January 1, 2008 through February 8, 2008. A. H. Belo will also be
responsible for its income taxes for 2008 not paid on a consolidated basis. In addition, even though
the distribution otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment to shareholders, Belo (but not its
shareholders) will recognize for tax purposes approximately $51,900 of previously deferred
intercompany non-cash gains in connection with the distribution, resulting in a federal income tax
obligation of approximately $18,000, and a state tax that is not currently estimable and which is
not expected to be material. If such gains are adjusted in the future, then Belo and the Company
shall be responsible for paying the additional tax associated with any increase in such gains in
the ratio of one-third and two-thirds, respectively. With respect to all other taxes, Belo will be
responsible for taxes attributable to the television business and
related assets, and A. H. Belo will be responsible for taxes attributable to the newspaper businesses and related businesses. In
addition, the Company will indemnify Belo, and Belo will indemnify the Company, for all taxes and
liabilities incurred as a result of post-distribution actions or omissions by the indemnifying
party that affect the tax consequences of the distribution, subject to certain exceptions.
The
employee matters agreement allocates liabilities and responsibilities
regarding employee
compensation and benefit plans and programs and other related matters in connection with the
distribution,
90
Table of Contents
including, without limitation, the treatment of outstanding Belo equity awards,
certain outstanding annual and long-term incentive awards, existing deferred compensation
obligations, and certain retirement and welfare benefit obligations. See Notes 5 and 6.
Belos Dallas/Fort Worth television station, WFAA-TV, and The Dallas Morning News, owned by A.
H. Belo, entered into an agreement whereby each agrees to provide media content, cross-promotion,
and other services to the other. The Dallas Morning News and
WFAA-TV currently share media content at no cost, as do other media operating companies of Belo and
A. H. Belo, and that sharing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
In connection with the distribution from Belo, A. H. Belo entered into a bank credit facility agreement on February 4, 2008. See Note 7.
91
Table of Contents
Note 14: Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)
Following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | |||||||||||||
2007 |
||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 141,945 | $ | 157,704 | $ | 147,511 | $ | 153,175 | ||||||||
Circulation |
27,617 | 27,894 | 28,210 | 28,914 | ||||||||||||
Other |
6,151 | 6,678 | 6,219 | 6,650 | ||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
175,713 | 192,276 | 181,940 | 188,739 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
75,299 | 72,492 | 72,840 | 76,999 | ||||||||||||
Other production, distribution and
operating costs |
60,899 | 65,170 | 66,243 | 66,919 | ||||||||||||
Newsprint, ink and other supplies |
26,668 | 26,007 | 25,037 | 24,789 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| | | 344,424 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
11,360 | 11,352 | 11,142 | 11,961 | ||||||||||||
Amortization |
1,625 | 1,625 | 1,624 | 1,625 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
175,851 | 176,646 | 176,886 | 526,717 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
(8,570 | ) | (6,427 | ) | (8,238 | ) | (7,832 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax
(expense) benefit |
(688 | ) | 3,097 | (3,097 | ) | 2,175 | ||||||||||
Net earnings
(loss) |
$ | (9,396 | ) | $ | 12,300 | $ | (6,281 | ) | $ | (343,635 | ) | |||||
2006 |
||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
$ | 160,761 | $ | 174,415 | $ | 161,562 | $ | 177,402 | ||||||||
Circulation |
29,184 | 28,737 | 29,229 | 29,115 | ||||||||||||
Other |
7,086 | 7,079 | 6,467 | 6,696 | ||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
197,031 | 210,231 | 197,258 | 213,213 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
83,458 | 78,043 | 82,709 | 78,737 | ||||||||||||
Other production, distribution and operating costs |
60,317 | 66,309 | 62,515 | 68,935 | ||||||||||||
Newsprint, ink and other supplies |
36,463 | 33,933 | 30,484 | 31,895 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
9,871 | 10,028 | 9,868 | 10,229 | ||||||||||||
Amortization |
1,645 | 1,646 | 1,645 | 1,646 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
191,754 | 189,959 | 187,221 | 191,442 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
(6,748 | ) | (7,439 | ) | (8,578 | ) | (7,545 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax
(expense) benefit |
595 | (4,760 | ) | (1,906 | ) | (5,797 | ) | |||||||||
Net earnings
(loss) |
$ | (876 | ) | $ | 8,073 | $ | (447 | ) | $ | 8,429 | ||||||
92