Destination Maternity Corp - Quarter Report: 2012 December (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2012

Or

For the transition period from            to            

Commission file number 0-21196

Destination Maternity Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (215) 873-2200

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $.01 par value — 13,520,973 shares outstanding as of January 31, 2013

Table of Contents

DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Table of Contents

DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

Table of Contents

DESTINATION MATERNITY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted. Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012 for Destination Maternity Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Destination Maternity”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for additional disclosures including a summary of the Company’s accounting policies.

In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented. Since the Company’s operations are seasonal, the interim operating results of the Company may not be indicative of operating results for the full year.

The Company operates on a fiscal year ending September 30 of each year. All references to fiscal years of the Company refer to fiscal years, or periods within such fiscal years, ended on September 30 in those years. For example, the Company’s “fiscal 2013” will end on September 30, 2013.

Basic net income (or earnings) per share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, excluding restricted stock awards for which the restrictions have not lapsed. Diluted net income (or earnings) per share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to the potential dilution, if applicable, from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and from the assumed lapse of restrictions on restricted stock awards. Common shares issuable in connection with the award of performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are excluded from the calculation of EPS until the RSUs’ performance conditions are achieved and the shares in respect of the RSUs become issuable (see Note 9).

The following table summarizes the Basic EPS and Diluted EPS calculations (in thousands, except per share amounts):

In addition to performance-based RSUs, for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, options and unvested restricted stock totaling 300,605 and 436,074 shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of Diluted EPS as their effect would have been antidilutive.

During the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 the Company paid cash dividends totaling $2,359,000 (or $0.175 per share) and $2,320,000 (or $0.175 per share), respectively. On January 25, 2013 the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.175 per share payable on March 28, 2013, which will total approximately $2,400,000.

8

Table of Contents

Trade receivables are recorded based on revenue recognized for sales of the Company’s merchandise and for other revenue earned by the Company through its marketing partnership programs and international franchise agreements, and are non-interest bearing. The Company evaluates the collectability of trade receivables based on a combination of factors, including aging of trade receivables, write-off experience, analysis of historical trends and expectations of future performance. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded for the amount of trade receivables that are considered unlikely to be collected. When the Company’s collection efforts are unsuccessful, uncollectible trade receivables are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts. As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, the Company’s trade receivables were net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $201,000 and $201,000, respectively.

Inventories were comprised of the following (in thousands):

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities were comprised of the following (in thousands):

On November 1, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year $61,000,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which replaced the Company’s former $55,000,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Prior Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility consists of two tranches: (i) a senior secured revolving credit and letter of credit facility of up to $55,000,000 (“Tranche A”) and (ii) a senior secured first-in, last-out revolving credit facility of up to $6,000,000 (“Tranche A-1”). The Credit Facility will mature on November 1, 2017. Upon the Company’s request and with the consent of the lender, permitted borrowings under Tranche A may be increased up to an additional $15,000,000, in increments of $2,500,000, up to a Tranche A maximum limit of $70,000,000. Proceeds from advances under the Credit Facility, with certain restrictions, may be used to repay existing debt, and to provide financing for working capital, letters of credit, capital expenditures, dividends, share repurchases and other general corporate purposes.

The Credit Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants and representations and warranties. Under the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain minimum Excess Availability (as defined in the related Credit Facility agreement) equal to 10% of the Borrowing Base (as defined in the related Credit Facility agreement). The Credit Facility is secured by a security interest in the Company’s trade receivables, inventory, real estate interests, letter of credit rights, cash, intangibles and certain other assets. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings is equal to, at the Company’s election, either (i) the lender’s base rate plus the applicable margin, or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin for base rate borrowings is 0.50% for Tranche A borrowings and 2.00% for Tranche A-1 borrowings. The applicable margin for LIBOR rate borrowings is 1.50% for Tranche A borrowings and 3.00% for Tranche A-1 borrowings. Tranche A-1 borrowings are deemed to be the first loans made and the last loans repaid. The Company also pays an unused line fee under the Credit Facility of 0.25% per annum. In connection with the execution of the Credit Facility, the Company incurred deferred financing costs of $851,000, of which $61,000 were paid in fiscal 2012.

9

Table of Contents

The Prior Credit Facility had a maturity date of January 13, 2013. Proceeds from advances under the Prior Credit Facility, subject to certain restrictions, could be used to provide financing for working capital, letters of credit, capital expenditures, debt prepayments, dividends, share repurchases and other general corporate purposes. The Prior Credit Facility contained customary provisions, including affirmative and negative covenants, representations and warranties, and an unused line fee. There were no financial covenant requirements under the Prior Credit Facility unless Excess Availability (as defined in the related Prior Credit Facility agreement) fell below 10% of the Borrowing Base (as defined in the related Prior Credit Facility agreement). Throughout the period of the Prior Credit Facility, the Company exceeded the applicable excess availability requirements under the Prior Credit Facility and was not subject to any financial covenants.

The Prior Credit Facility was secured by a security interest in the Company’s trade receivables, inventory, real estate interests, letter of credit rights, cash, intangibles and certain other assets. The security interest granted to the Prior Credit Facility lender was, in certain respects, subordinate to the security interest granted to the Company’s Term Loan lenders. The interest rate on outstanding borrowings was equal to, at the Company’s election, either (i) the lender’s prime rate plus the applicable margin, or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable margin. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the applicable margins were variable, ranging from 0.75% to 1.25% for prime rate borrowings, and from 1.75% to 2.25% for LIBOR rate borrowings, based upon the availability calculation made in accordance with the Prior Credit Facility. The applicable margin for both prime rate and LIBOR rate borrowings, based upon the availability calculation made in accordance with the agreement, was the lowest available margin throughout the period of the Prior Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $5,060,000 in letters of credit, with $47,622,000 of availability under the Credit Facility, based on the Company’s Borrowing Base formula. As of December 31, 2012, a letter of credit for $1,874,000 related to the Company’s outstanding obligation under an Industrial Revenue Bond (“IRB”), which was issued under the Prior Credit Facility, was in the process of being replaced with a letter of credit to be issued under the new Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had $2,082,000 on deposit with the agent bank for the Prior Credit Facility as cash collateral for the letter of credit during the transition process, which is included as restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The cash collateral will be released to the Company after the original letter of credit is returned to the agent bank and cancelled. As of December 31, 2012, Tranche A borrowings under the Credit Facility would have resulted in interest at a rate between approximately 1.71% and 3.75% per annum, and Tranche A-1 borrowings under the Credit Facility would have resulted in interest at a rate between approximately 3.21% and 5.25% per annum. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company’s average level of direct borrowings (all of which was under the Credit Facility) was $815,000, and the Company’s maximum borrowings at any time were $6,200,000. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have any direct borrowings under the Prior Credit Facility.

Prior to November 1, 2012, the Company had a Term Loan and Security Agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”) for a senior secured Term Loan B due March 13, 2013 (the “Term Loan”), the $90,000,000 proceeds of which were received on April 18, 2007. On November 1, 2012, the Company prepaid the remaining Term Loan balance of $13,427,000 in connection with the execution of its new Credit Facility. The interest rate on the Term Loan was equal to, at the Company’s election, either (i) the prime rate plus 1.00%, or (ii) a LIBOR rate plus the applicable margin. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the applicable margin for LIBOR rate borrowings was either 2.25% or 2.50%, depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement). Based upon the Company’s applicable quarterly Consolidated Leverage Ratios, the applicable margin for LIBOR rate borrowings was 2.25% during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012. Prior to its repayment, the Term Loan required minimum principal repayments in quarterly installments of $225,000 each, in addition to an annual principal repayment equal to 25% or 50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) in excess of $5,000,000 for each fiscal year, with the 25% or 50% factor depending on the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio. There was no required principal repayment related to fiscal 2011 results. The Term Loan was permitted to be prepaid at the Company’s option, in part or in whole, at any time without any prepayment premium or penalty. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012 the Company made optional prepayments of $13,427,000 and $5,000,000, respectively, on the outstanding Term Loan.

10

Table of Contents

The Term Loan was secured by a security interest in the Company’s trade receivables, inventory, real estate interests, letter of credit rights, cash, intangibles and certain other assets. The security interest granted to the Term Loan lenders was, in certain respects, subordinate to the security interest granted to the lender under the Prior Credit Facility. The Term Loan Agreement imposed certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, repurchase stock, and enter into other various types of transactions. The Term Loan Agreement also contained quarterly financial covenants that required the Company to maintain a specified maximum permitted Consolidated Leverage Ratio and a specified minimum permitted Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement). Throughout the period of the Term Loan, the Company was in compliance with all covenants of the Term Loan Agreement.

In order to mitigate the Company’s floating rate interest risk on the variable rate Term Loan, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with the agent bank for the Term Loan for a five-year term commencing on April 18, 2007, the date the $90,000,000 Term Loan proceeds were received. The interest rate swap agreement enabled the Company to effectively convert an amount of the Term Loan (equal to the notional amount of the interest rate swap) from a floating interest rate (LIBOR plus 2.25% during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, based on the Company’s specified leverage ratios), to a fixed interest rate (7.25% during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, based on the Company’s specified leverage ratios). The notional amount of the interest rate swap was $75,000,000 at the inception of the swap agreement and decreased over time to a notional amount of $5,000,000 at the expiration date of April 18, 2012.

The Company has $1,830,000 outstanding under an IRB at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012. The IRB has a variable interest rate that may be converted to a fixed interest rate at the option of the Company. At any time prior to conversion to a fixed interest rate structure, bondholders may put back to the Company (i.e. require the Company to repurchase) all or part of the IRB upon notice to the bond trustee, after which the remarketing agent would attempt to resell to third parties the put portion of the IRB. If the remarketing agent is unsuccessful in reselling the put portion of the IRB, the bond trustee may then draw on a letter of credit issued under the Prior Credit Facility (see above) to repurchase the put bonds from bondholders on the Company’s behalf. Pursuant to this arrangement, the IRB is classified as a current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2012 bondholders have put a total of $1,515,000 of the IRB back to the Company, and these put bonds were successfully resold by the remarketing agent to third parties. The letter of credit issued to secure the bonds has never been drawn upon.

The accounting standard for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard establishes a framework for measuring fair value focused on exit price and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements as follows:

At December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, the Company had cash equivalents of $16,965,000 and $19,462,000, respectively. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of investments in money market funds for which the carrying value approximates fair value (based on Level 1 inputs) due to the short-term nature of those instruments.

The carrying values of trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of those instruments. The Company’s long-term debt bears interest at a variable rate, which adjusts based on market conditions and the carrying value of the long-term debt approximates fair value. The fair value of the Company’s debt was determined using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates currently available to the Company, which the Company considers to be Level 2 inputs.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had $4,133,000 of unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain income tax positions, including accrued interest and penalties of $1,845,000. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its income tax provision. If recognized, the portion of the liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the Company’s effective tax rate was $3,054,000, net of federal benefit.

11

Table of Contents

During the twelve months subsequent to December 31, 2012, it is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits could potentially increase by approximately $632,000 (of which approximately $477,000 would affect the effective tax rate, net of federal benefit) for uncertain tax positions, including the continued effect of interest on unrecognized tax benefits and limitations on certain potential tax credits, partially offset by the effect of expiring statutes of limitations and settlements.

The Company’s United States Federal income tax returns for years ended September 30, 2009 and thereafter remain subject to examination by the United States Internal Revenue Service. The Company also files returns in Canada, India, Kuwait and numerous United States state jurisdictions, which have varying statutes of limitations. Generally, Canadian tax returns for tax years ended September 30, 2007 and thereafter, Indian tax returns for tax years ended March 31, 2009, Kuwait tax returns for tax years ended September 30, 2009 and thereafter, and United States state tax returns for tax years ended September 30, 2008 and thereafter, depending upon the jurisdiction, remain subject to examination. However, the statutes of limitations on certain of the Company’s United States state returns remain open for years prior to fiscal 2008.

In each of December 2012 and December 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors established performance goals for the award of performance-based RSUs for four executive officers, under the Amended and Restated Destination Maternity Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The RSUs earned, if any, under the December 2012 awards (the “2012 Awards”) will be based on the Company’s cumulative operating income, as reflected in the Company’s financial statements, from fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2015. The RSUs earned, if any, under the December 2011 awards (the “2011 Awards”) will be based on the Company’s cumulative operating income, as reflected in the Company’s financial statements, from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2014. The grant of any RSUs under these awards will generally be further contingent on the continued employment of the executive officers with the Company through the dates on which the shares in respect of these RSUs, if any, are issued following the end of the applicable performance periods, as well as the achievement of certain minimum levels of operating income in the final fiscal year of each applicable performance period. Any dividends declared on the shares of the Company’s common stock underlying the RSUs will be credited as additional RSUs based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the dividend payment date. The additional RSUs, if any, will be earned on the same terms as the original RSUs. For the 2012 Awards, the executive officers will earn a cumulative total of 18,541 RSUs, excluding RSUs from dividends declared, if the Company’s cumulative operating income for fiscal 2013 through fiscal 2015 equals or exceeds a threshold of $109,582,000, and will ratably earn up to a maximum cumulative total of 55,621 RSUs, excluding RSUs from dividends declared, if the Company’s operating income during such performance period equals or exceeds $132,201,000. For the 2011 Awards, the executive officers will earn a cumulative total of 19,531 RSUs, excluding RSUs from dividends declared, if the Company’s cumulative operating income for fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2014 equals or exceeds a threshold of $120,000,000, and will ratably earn up to a maximum cumulative total of 58,590 RSUs, excluding RSUs from dividends declared, if the Company’s operating income during such performance period equals or exceeds $132,000,000.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, options to purchase 85,949 shares of common stock with an aggregate exercise price of $618,000 were exercised by the option holders and net-share settled by the Company, such that the Company withheld 30,996 shares of the Company’s common stock, which had a fair market value equal to the aggregate exercise price of the stock options.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, certain stock option exercises and vesting restricted stock awards were net-share settled by the Company such that the Company withheld shares of the Company’s common stock, which had a fair market value equivalent to the minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and employment taxes for the awards, and the Company remitted the cash value to the appropriate taxing authorities. The total shares withheld, which were 26,624 and 482 shares, respectively, during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, are reflected as repurchase of common stock in the accompanying financial statements, and were based on the value of the Company’s common stock on the exercise or vesting date. The remaining shares, net of those withheld, were delivered to the award holders. Total payments for tax obligations to the tax authorities were $532,000 and $6,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company had Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements (the “SERP Agreements”) with Dan Matthias, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Rebecca Matthias, the Company’s former President and Chief Creative Officer. The Company’s transition agreement with Mr. Matthias in connection with his retirement effective September 30, 2008, amended his SERP Agreement to provide for full vesting of the benefits payable to Mr. Matthias and to increase the

12

Table of Contents

total of the amounts payable under his SERP Agreement to approximately 10% more than the amount that would have been payable on September 30, 2012 (the date his SERP Agreement had otherwise been expected to fully vest). The SERP Agreement benefits, totaling $3,960,000, were being paid to Mr. Matthias in installments, which commenced on April 1, 2009, with the final installment paid on October 1, 2012. During each of the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, SERP benefits paid to Mr. Matthias totaled $150,000. The Company’s obligation under Ms. Matthias’ SERP Agreement was fully paid in fiscal 2011.

Net periodic pension cost on a pretax basis for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 consisted of interest cost of $5,000.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 required companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminated the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. The standard did not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, which defers the effective date of the requirement to present separate line items on the statement of income for reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. ASU No. 2011-05 and No. 2011-12 were effective for financial statements issued for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and interim periods within those years. In accordance with ASU No. 2011-05 and No. 2011-12 the Company has presented two separate but consecutive statements, which include the components of net income and other comprehensive income. Because this guidance impacted presentation only, the adoption of the new requirements of ASU No. 2011-05 and No. 2011-12 did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

From time to time, the Company is named as a defendant in legal actions arising from normal business activities. Litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the amount of any liability that could arise with respect to currently pending actions cannot be accurately predicted, the Company does not believe that the resolution of any pending action will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Operating Segment. For purposes of the disclosure requirements for segments of a business enterprise, the Company has determined that its business is comprised of one operating segment: the design, manufacture and sale of maternity apparel and related accessories. While the Company offers a wide range of products for sale, the substantial portion of its products are initially distributed through the same distribution facilities, many of the Company’s products are manufactured at common contract manufacturer production facilities, the Company’s products are marketed through a common marketing department, and these products are sold to a similar customer base consisting of expectant mothers.

Geographic Information. Information concerning the Company’s operations by geographic area was as follows (in thousands):

Major Customers. For the periods presented, the Company did not have any one customer who represented more than 10% of its net sales.

13

Table of Contents

Interest expense, net was comprised of the following (in thousands):

14

Table of Contents

Our fiscal year ends on September 30. All references in this discussion to our fiscal years refer to the fiscal year, or periods within the fiscal year, ended on September 30 in the year mentioned. For example, our “fiscal 2013” will end on September 30, 2013.

Overview

We are the leading designer and retailer of maternity apparel in the United States with 1,887 retail locations, including 621 stores in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Canada, and 1,266 leased departments located within department stores and baby specialty stores throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. In addition to the 1,887 retail locations we operate, through an exclusive licensed arrangement we are the exclusive provider of maternity apparel to Kohl’s^®, which operates approximately 1,146 stores throughout the United States. We also sell merchandise on the Internet, primarily through DestinationMaternity.com and our various brand-specific websites.

In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of operational and financial measures. The key measures for determining how our business is performing are net income determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP net income”) and the corresponding net income (or earnings) per share (diluted), net income before stock-based compensation expense and loss on extinguishment of debt (“Non-GAAP adjusted net income”) and the corresponding earnings per share (diluted), Adjusted EBITDA (defined below), net sales, and comparable sales. Adjusted EBITDA represents operating income before deduction for the following non-cash charges: (i) depreciation and amortization expense; (ii) loss on impairment of tangible and intangible assets; (iii) loss on disposal of assets; and (iv) stock-based compensation expense.

Comparable sales figures include sales at retail locations (which does not include licensed or franchised relationships) that have been in operation by us for at least twelve full months at the beginning of the period for which such data is presented, as well as Internet sales. Comparable sales figures do not include retail locations opened during a period even if such location was opened in connection with the closure of other retail locations in the same geographic area (including, for example, the opening of a new Destination Maternity combo store or superstore). Also, our comparable sales figures generally do not include: (i) retail locations which change store nameplate, location type or format; (ii) retail locations which are expanded, contracted or relocated if the square footage of the retail location has changed by 20% or more, or, if in the judgment of management, such expansion, contraction or relocation materially alters the comparability of the retail location (either with respect to the manner of its operation or otherwise); (iii) in the case of relocations only, retail locations which are not in the same immediate geographical vicinity (such as, without limitation, the same mall, the same part of a mall, or the same street) after the relocation; or (iv) retail locations which, in the judgment of management, have undergone other significant changes which materially alter the comparability of the retail location (either with respect to the manner of its operation or otherwise) (such as, for example only, in the case of closure of retail locations in connection with the cessation of a leased department relationship where the manner of operation of such retail location has been materially altered prior to closure, or in the case of construction in, on or near a retail location, which significantly interferes with the customer traffic, visibility or operation of a retail location).

Following is a summary of our first quarter fiscal 2013 results with regard to each of the key measures noted above:

First Quarter Fiscal 2013 Financial Results

15

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth certain operating data as a percentage of net sales and as a percentage change for the three months ended December 31:

The following tables set forth certain information concerning the number of our retail locations, and international franchised locations for the periods indicated:

16

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Net Sales. Our net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 decreased by 0.8%, or $1.1 million, to $135.3 million from $136.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Comparable sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 increased 1.9% versus a comparable sales decrease of 4.1% for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Our first quarter fiscal 2013 reported comparable sales increase of 1.9% was adversely impacted by approximately 1 percentage point due to having one less Saturday in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 than in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Thus, adjusting for this “days shift,” our adjusted comparable sales increased approximately 2.9% for the first quarter of fiscal 2013. Our Internet sales, which are included in comparable sales, increased 18% for the first quarter of fiscal 2013, on top of a 32% increase in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The slight decrease in total reported sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 resulted primarily from decreased sales related to our continued efforts to close underperforming stores, partially offset by the increase in comparable sales.

As of December 31, 2012, we operated a total of 621 stores and 1,887 total retail locations, compared to 656 stores and 2,061 total retail locations as of December 31, 2011. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we opened two Destination Maternity multi-brand stores and we closed six stores, with two of the store closings related to Destination Maternity store openings. In connection with our new broad-based partnership with Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and its subsidiary, Buy Buy Baby, Inc., which we previously announced in May 2012, we discontinued operation of our 124 remaining leased departments in Babies“R”Us^® stores in late October 2012 and began to open leased departments in select buybuy BABY^® stores. The decreases in leased department locations at the end of December 2012 compared to December 2011 predominantly reflects this change of partners in October 2012. As of December 19, 2012, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. had 80 buybuy BABY stores, including 12 stores as of December 31, 2012, in which we operate leased departments. Over time, we expect to significantly increase the number of buybuy BABY stores in which we have a maternity apparel leased department. In addition, our Oh Baby by Motherhood^® collection is available at Kohl’s stores throughout the United States.

Gross Profit. Our gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 increased by 2.2%, or $1.6 million, to $71.2 million from $69.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, and our gross profit as a percentage of net sales (gross margin) for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 was 52.6% compared to 51.0% for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The increase in gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was due to our higher gross margin. The increase in gross margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily due to lower product costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 decreased by 1.3%, or approximately $0.9 million, to $64.2 million from $65.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 47.5% for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to 47.7% for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This decrease in expense for the quarter resulted primarily from lower expenses related to our continued efforts to close underperforming stores (primarily payroll and occupancy costs), partially offset by higher advertising and marketing expenses and higher variable incentive compensation expense.

Store Closing, Asset Impairment and Asset Disposal Expenses. Our store closing, asset impairment and asset disposal expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 increased by approximately $0.1 million, to $0.5 million from $0.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, which primarily reflected slightly higher impairment charges for write-downs of long-lived assets.

Operating Income. We had operating income of $6.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $4.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Operating income as a percentage of net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 increased to 4.8% from 3.0% for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The increase in operating income and operating income percentage was primarily due to our higher gross profit, and to a lesser extent, decreased selling, general and administrative expenses.

17

Table of Contents

Interest Expense, Net. Our net interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 decreased by 50.0%, or $0.2 million, to $0.2 million from $0.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This decrease was due to our lower debt level, primarily as a result of the $23.4 million of Term Loan prepayments we made in the previous twelve months.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 we prepaid the remaining $13.4 million of our outstanding Term Loan. The $13.4 million Term Loan prepayment resulted in a first quarter fiscal 2013 pretax charge of $9,000, representing the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs. In December 2011, we prepaid $5.0 million in principal amount of our Term Loan resulting in a pretax charge of $10,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Income Tax Provision. For the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012 our effective tax rate was 38.5%. Our effective tax rates for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were higher than the statutory federal tax rate of 35% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes, net of federal benefit, and to a lesser extent, additional income tax expense (including interest and penalties) recognized as required by the accounting standard for uncertain income tax positions. We expect our effective tax rate for the full year fiscal 2013 to be approximately 38.5%.

Net Income. Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 was $3.8 million, or $0.29 per share (diluted), compared to net income of $2.3 million, or $0.17 per share (diluted), for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Net income for both the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 includes (net of tax) stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million and loss on extinguishment of debt of $6,000. Before stock-based compensation expense and loss on extinguishment of debt, our first quarter fiscal 2013 net income was $4.3 million, or $0.32 per share (diluted), compared to $2.6 million, or $0.20 per share (diluted), for the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Our average diluted shares outstanding of 13,345,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 were 1.1% higher than the 13,195,000 average diluted shares outstanding for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, primarily as a result of the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock.

Following is a reconciliation of GAAP net income and net income per share (“EPS”) (diluted) to Non-GAAP adjusted net income and net income per share (diluted) for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

18

Table of Contents

Following is a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

Regulation G Disclosures

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains non-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of the SEC’s Regulation G, including: (a) Adjusted net income, before stock-based compensation expense and loss on extinguishment of debt (Non-GAAP adjusted net income); (b) Adjusted net income per share (diluted), before stock-based compensation expense and loss on extinguishment of debt; and (c) Adjusted EBITDA (operating income before deduction for the following non-cash charges: (i) depreciation and amortization expense; (ii) loss on impairment of tangible and intangible assets; (iii) loss on disposal of assets; and (iv) stock-based compensation expense).

Our management believes that each of these non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information about the Company’s results of operations and/or financial position to both investors and management. Each non-GAAP financial measure is provided because management believes it is an important measure of financial performance used in the retail industry to measure operating results, to determine the value of companies within the industry and to define standards for borrowing from institutional lenders. We use each of these non-GAAP financial measures as a measure of the performance of the Company. We provide these measures to investors to assist them in performing their analysis of our historical operating results. Each of these non-GAAP financial measures reflects a measure of the Company’s operating results before consideration of certain charges and consequently, none of these measures should be construed as an alternative to net income or operating income as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of the Company’s liquidity, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We may calculate each of these non-GAAP financial measures differently than other companies.

With respect to the non-GAAP financial measures discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, we have provided reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Seasonality

Our business, like that of many other retailers, is seasonal. Our quarterly net sales have historically been highest in our third fiscal quarter, corresponding to the Spring selling season. Given the historically higher sales level in our third fiscal quarter and the relatively fixed nature of most of our operating expenses and interest expense, we have typically generated a very significant percentage of our full year operating income and net income during our third fiscal quarter. Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year. Quarterly results may fluctuate materially depending upon, among other things, increases or decreases in comparable sales, the timing of new store openings and new leased department openings, net sales and profitability contributed by new stores and leased departments, the timing of the fulfillment of purchase orders under our product and license arrangements, adverse weather conditions, shifts in the timing of certain holidays and promotions, changes in inventory and production levels and the timing of deliveries of inventory, and changes in our merchandise mix.

19

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash needs have primarily been for (i) debt service, including principal prepayments, (ii) capital expenditures, including leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment for new stores, store relocations and expansions of our existing stores, as well as improvements and new equipment for our distribution and corporate facilities and information systems, (iii) quarterly cash dividends, and (iv) working capital, including inventory to support our business. We have historically financed our capital requirements from cash flows from operations, borrowings under our credit facilities or available cash balances.

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $2.3 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to an increase of $14.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Cash provided by operations of $24.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2013 increased by $0.7 million from the $23.7 million in cash provided by operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. This increase in cash provided by operations as compared to the prior year was primarily the result of higher net income in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012, partially offset by net working capital changes that provided slightly less cash in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 than was provided in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Our working capital changes, quarterly net income and cash flow adjustments may fluctuate significantly and net cash provided by operating activities for any quarter is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 we used cash provided by operations to fund repayments of long-term debt, to pay our quarterly cash dividend, to pay for capital expenditures, and to provide $2.1 million of cash collateral for our IRB letter of credit (see below). On November 1, 2012, we prepaid the remaining Term Loan balance of $13.4 million in connection with the execution of our new Credit Facility. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we paid $2.4 million for our quarterly cash dividend. For the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we spent $2.3 million on capital expenditures, including $1.7 million for leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment for new store facilities, as well as improvements to existing stores, and $0.6 million for our information systems and distribution and corporate facilities. The remaining cash provided during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 was used primarily to increase our available cash.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012 we used cash provided by operations to fund repayments of long-term debt, to pay our quarterly cash dividend and to pay for capital expenditures. Our $5.2 million of repayments of long-term debt in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 consisted predominantly of a $5.0 million prepayment of our Term Loan. In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we paid $2.3 million for our quarterly cash dividend. For the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we spent $1.3 million on capital expenditures, including $0.9 million for leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment for new store facilities, as well as improvements to existing stores, and $0.4 million for our information systems and distribution and corporate facilities. The remaining cash provided during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was used primarily to increase our available cash.

On November 1, 2012, we entered into a five-year $61.0 million senior secured revolving Credit Facility, which replaced our $55.0 million Prior Credit Facility. The Credit Facility consists of two tranches: (i) a senior secured revolving credit and letter of credit facility of up to $55.0 million (“Tranche A”) and (ii) a senior secured first-in, last-out revolving credit facility of up to $6.0 million (“Tranche A-1”). The Credit Facility will mature on November 1, 2017. Upon our request and with the consent of the lender, permitted borrowings under Tranche A may be increased up to an additional $15.0 million, in increments of $2.5 million, up to a Tranche A maximum limit of $70 million. Proceeds from advances under the Credit Facility, with certain restrictions, may be used to repay our existing debt, and to provide financing for working capital, letters of credit, capital expenditures, dividends, share repurchases and other general corporate purposes. Under the Credit Facility, we are required to maintain minimum Excess Availability (as defined in the related Credit Facility agreement) equal to 10% of the Borrowing Base (as defined in the related Credit Facility agreement). The Credit Facility is secured by a security interest in our trade receivables, inventory, equipment, real estate interests, letter of credit rights, cash, intangibles and certain other assets.

As of December 31, 2012, we had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $5.1 million in letters of credit, with $47.6 million of availability under our Credit Facility, based on our Borrowing Base formula. As of December 31, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings and $7.3 million in letters of credit, with $39.9 million of availability under our Prior Credit Facility, based on our Borrowing Base formula. As of December 31, 2012, a letter of credit for $1.9 million related to our outstanding obligation under the IRB (see below), which was issued under the Prior Credit Facility, was outstanding. We are evaluating alternatives for securitization of the IRB. As of December 31, 2012, we had $2.1 million on deposit with the agent bank for the Prior Credit Facility as cash collateral for the letter of credit. The cash collateral will be released to us after the original letter of credit is returned to the agent bank and cancelled. As of December 31, 2012, Tranche A borrowings under the Credit Facility would have resulted in interest at a rate between

20

Table of Contents

approximately 1.71% and 3.75% per annum, and Tranche A-1 borrowings under the Credit Facility would have resulted in interest at a rate between approximately 3.21% and 5.25% per annum. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, our average level of direct borrowings (all of which was under the Credit Facility) was $0.8 million, and our maximum borrowings at any time were $6.2 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, we did not have any direct borrowings under the Prior Credit Facility.

Prior to November 1, 2012, we had a Term Loan Agreement for our Term Loan. On November 1, 2012, we prepaid the remaining Term Loan balance of $13.4 million in connection with the execution of our new Credit Facility. Prior to its repayment, the Term Loan required minimum principal repayments in quarterly installments of $225,000 each, in addition to an annual principal repayment equal to 25% or 50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) in excess of $5.0 million for each fiscal year, with the 25% or 50% factor depending on our Consolidated Leverage Ratio. There was no required principal repayment related to fiscal 2011 results. The Term Loan was permitted to be prepaid at our option, in part or in whole, at any time without any prepayment premium or penalty. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, we made optional prepayments of $13.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively, on the outstanding Term Loan.

We have $1.8 million outstanding under an IRB at December 31, 2012. The IRB has a variable interest rate that may be converted to a fixed interest rate at our option. At any time prior to conversion to a fixed interest rate structure, bondholders may put back to us (i.e. require us to repurchase) all or part of the IRB upon notice to the bond trustee, after which the remarketing agent would attempt to resell to third parties the put portion of the IRB. If the remarketing agent is unsuccessful in reselling the put portion of the IRB, the bond trustee may then draw on a letter of credit issued under the Prior Credit Facility (see above) to repurchase the put bonds from bondholders on our behalf. As of December 31, 2012, bondholders have put $1.5 million of the IRB back to us, and these put bonds were successfully resold by the remarketing agent to third parties. The letter of credit issued to secure the bonds has never been drawn upon. In the event that the bondholders put the bonds back to us and the remarketing agent fails to resell the bonds, which we believe is unlikely, we expect the acceleration of the payment of the bonds would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or liquidity.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012 we paid cash dividends of approximately $2.4 million (or $0.175 per share) and $2.3 million (or $0.175 per share), respectively. On January 25, 2013 we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.175 per share payable on March 28, 2013, which will total approximately $2.4 million. Based on our current quarterly dividend rate of $0.175 per share, we project approximately $9.5 million of cash dividends for fiscal 2013.

Our management believes that our current cash and working capital positions, expected operating cash flows and available borrowing capacity, will be sufficient to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, dividend payment and debt repayment requirements, and to fund stock repurchases and/or debt prepayments, if any, for at least the next 12 months.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Our critical accounting policies are described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, there were no material changes in, or additions to, our critical accounting policies or in the assumptions or estimates we used to prepare the financial information appearing in this report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 required companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminated the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. The standard did not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, which defers the effective date of the requirement to present separate line items on the statement of income for reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. ASU No. 2011-05 and No. 2011-12 were effective for financial statements issued for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and interim periods within those years. In accordance with ASU No. 2011-05 and No. 2011-12 we have presented two separate but consecutive statements, which include the components of net income and other comprehensive income. Because this guidance impacted presentation only, the adoption of the new requirements of ASU No. 2011-05 and No. 2011-12 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

21

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the information in this report, including the information incorporated by reference (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us), contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause our actual results, performance, achievements or industry results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to the following: the continuation of economic recovery of the retail industry in general and of apparel purchases in particular, our ability to successfully manage our various business initiatives, the success of our international business and its expansion, our ability to successfully manage, retain and expand our leased department and licensed relationships and marketing partnerships, future sales trends in our various sales channels, unusual weather patterns, changes in consumer spending patterns, raw material price increases, overall economic conditions and other factors affecting consumer confidence, demographics and other macroeconomic factors that may impact the level of spending for maternity apparel (such as fluctuations in pregnancy rates and birth rates), expense savings initiatives, our ability to anticipate and respond to fashion trends and consumer preferences, unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results, the impact of competition and fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of raw materials and contracted products, availability of suitable store locations, continued availability of capital and financing, our ability to hire and develop senior management and sales associates, our ability to develop and source merchandise, our ability to receive production from foreign sources on a timely basis, potential stock repurchases, our ability to generate sufficient free cash flow to continue our regular quarterly cash dividend, the trading liquidity of our common stock, changes in market interest rates, war or acts of terrorism and other factors referenced in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors.”

In addition, these forward-looking statements necessarily depend upon assumptions, estimates and dates that may be incorrect or imprecise and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. Accordingly, any forward-looking statements included in this report do not purport to be predictions of future events or circumstances and may not be realized. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking terms such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “pro forma,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “continues,” “could,” “estimates,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “goal,” “objective,” or the negative of any of these terms, or comparable terminology, or by discussions of our outlook, plans, goals, strategy or intentions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the SEC, we assume no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting these forward-looking statements.

Destination Maternity is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. We have not entered into any market sensitive instruments for trading purposes. The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market interest rates. The range of changes presented reflects our view of changes that are reasonably possible over a one-year period.

As of December 31, 2012, we had cash equivalents of $17.0 million. Our cash equivalents consist of investments in money market funds that bear interest at variable rates. A change in market interest rates earned on our investments impacts the interest income and cash flows, but does not materially impact the fair market value of the financial instruments. Due to the average maturity and conservative nature of our investment portfolio, we believe a sudden change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the value of our investment portfolio. The impact on our future interest income resulting from changes in investment yields will depend largely on the gross amount of our investment portfolio at that time. However, based upon the conservative nature of our investment portfolio and current experience, we do not believe a decrease in investment yields would have a material negative effect on our interest income.

As of December 31, 2012, the components of our debt portfolio were the $61.0 million Credit Facility and the $1.8 million IRB, both of which are denominated in United States dollars.

Our Credit Facility has variable interest rates that are tied to market indices. As of December 31, 2012, we had no direct borrowings and $5.1 million of letters of credit outstanding under our Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2012, Tranche A borrowings under the Credit Facility would have resulted in interest at a rate between approximately 1.71% and 3.75% per annum, and Tranche A-1 borrowings under the Credit Facility would have resulted in interest at a rate between approximately 3.21% and 5.25% per annum. Interest on any future borrowings under the Credit Facility would, to the extent of outstanding borrowings, be affected by changes in market interest rates. A change in market interest rates on the variable rate portion of our debt portfolio would impact the interest expense incurred and cash flows.

22

Table of Contents

The IRB carries a variable interest rate that is tied to market indices. The sensitivity analysis as it relates to this portion of our debt portfolio assumes an instantaneous 100 basis point move in interest rates from their levels as of December 31, 2012, with all other variables held constant. The principal amount of the IRB was $1.8 million as of December 31, 2012. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in additional annual interest expense on the IRB of less than $0.1 million. A 100 basis point decline in market interest rates would correspondingly lower our annual interest expense on the IRB by less than $0.1 million.

Other than as described above, we do not believe that the market risk exposure on other financial instruments is material.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure. We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2012, these controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

23

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION