DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)

 

 

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

Commission file number 000-24498

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio		65-0190407
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215
(Address, including Zip Code, of principal executive offices)

(614) 255-3333
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes: þ No: o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes: o No: o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes: o No: þ

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, as of August 7, 2009, is 2,605,379 shares.

 

 

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

		PAGE
Part I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements			3
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			15
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			22
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			22
Part II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			22
Item 1A. Risk Factors			22
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			22
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			22
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			23
Item 5. Other Information			23
Item 6. Exhibits			24
Signatures			25
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets

		6/30/2009				12/31/2008
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	16,278,697			$	15,788,560
Investment portfolio			22,029,205				17,185,611
Accounts receivable			5,459,990				5,339,558
Prepaid expenses			543,498				1,067,388
Fixed assets, net of depreciation, and other assets			1,052,285				835,314
Income tax receivable			422,187				2,334,836
Deferred taxes			1,462,058				1,989,016
Total assets		$	47,247,920			$	44,540,283
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	1,485,683			$	1,294,396
Accrued incentive compensation			4,450,000				13,000,000
Total liabilities			5,935,683				14,294,396
Commitments and contingencies			—				—
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock, no par value 7,000,000 shares authorized; 2,602,059 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009; 2,447,299 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008			22,217,630				16,233,501
Preferred stock, undesignated, 1,000,000 shares authorized and unissued			—				—
Deferred compensation			(4,493,722	)			(4,908,215	)
Retained earnings			23,588,329				18,920,601
Total shareholders’ equity			41,312,237				30,245,887
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	47,247,920			$	44,540,283
Tangible book value per share		$	15.88			$	12.36

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
REVENUES:
Investment advisory		$	8,467,852			$	10,755,220			$	16,256,795			$	20,268,115
Mutual fund administration, net			1,124,980				1,640,493				2,220,372				3,030,821
Total revenue			9,592,832				12,395,713				18,477,167				23,298,936
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Compensation and related costs			5,385,309				6,614,608				10,523,404				12,456,362
General and administrative			745,740				600,590				1,391,920				1,157,738
Sales and marketing			136,844				152,240				282,432				266,270
Third party distribution			215,742				395,721				464,412				791,826
Mutual fund administration			577,860				576,926				1,155,045				1,045,541
Total operating expenses			7,061,495				8,340,085				13,817,213				15,717,737
NET OPERATING INCOME			2,531,337				4,055,628				4,659,954				7,581,199
Investment return			4,031,896				(1,331,449	)			2,453,045				(1,706,113	)
INCOME BEFORE TAXES			6,563,233				2,724,179				7,112,999				5,875,086
Income tax provision			(2,247,738	)			(944,805	)			(2,445,271	)			(2,110,024	)
NET INCOME		$	4,315,495			$	1,779,374			$	4,667,728			$	3,765,062
Earnings per share
Basic		$	1.66			$	0.75			$	1.83			$	1.60
Diluted		$	1.66			$	0.73			$	1.82			$	1.55
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic			2,598,178				2,381,474				2,553,562				2,359,649
Diluted			2,602,637				2,447,151				2,558,119				2,424,601

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow (unaudited)

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income		$	4,667,728			$	3,765,062
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation on furniture and equipment			112,531				83,657
Amortization of deferred compensation			840,435				1,287,279
(Increase) in accounts receivable			(120,432	)			(1,206,581	)
Change in deferred taxes			513,773				1,939,345
Stock option expense			—				2,233
Noncash director fee expense			150,062				167,281
Investment (gain) loss, net			(577,134	)			2,407,110
(Decrease) in accrued liabilities			(3,506,497	)			(979,432	)
Other changes in assets and liabilities			2,594,488				(502,428	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			4,674,954				6,963,526
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment			(329,502	)			(287,363	)
Cost of investments purchased and other portfolio activity			(9,727,397	)			(3,971,023	)
Proceeds from sale of investments			5,460,937				—
Net cash (used in) investing activities			(4,595,962	)			(4,258,386	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payment for repurchase of common shares			—				(116,896	)
Payment of taxes withheld on employee stock transactions			(26,865	)			(131,800	)
Proceeds from common stock issuance			438,010				754,608
Net cash provided by financing activities			411,145				505,912
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Net change during the period			490,137				3,211,052
At beginning of period			15,788,560				11,783,278
At end of period		$	16,278,697			$	14,994,330
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest			—				—
Income taxes			610,090				1,805,000
Noncash transactions during the period for:
Common stock issued as incentive compensation			4,852,216				5,754,140

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 Organization

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated as a Florida corporation in April 1990 and in May 2002 reincorporated in Ohio, the Company’s principal place of business. The Company has four operating subsidiaries.

Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. (“DHCM”), an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and a registered investment advisor. DHCM is the investment adviser to the Diamond Hill Funds (the “Funds”), a series of open-end mutual funds, private investment funds (“Private Funds”), and also offers advisory services to institutional and individual investors.

Diamond Hill GP (Cayman) Ltd. (“DHGP”) was incorporated in the Cayman Islands as an exempted company on May 18, 2006 for the purpose of acting as the general partner of a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership. This partnership acts as a master fund for Diamond Hill Offshore Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company; and Diamond Hill Investment Partners II, L.P., an Ohio limited partnership. Diamond Hill GP (Cayman) Ltd. has no operating activity.

Beacon Hill Fund Services, Inc. (“BHFS”), an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated on January 29, 2008. BHFS provides certain compliance, treasury, and fund administration services to mutual fund companies. BHIL Distributors, Inc. (“BHIL”), an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of BHFS incorporated on February 19, 2008. BHIL provides underwriting and distribution services to mutual fund companies. BHFS and BHIL collectively operate as (“Beacon Hill”).

Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies:

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Segment Information

SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” establishes disclosure requirements relating to operating segments in annual and interim financial statements. Management has determined that the Company operates principally in one business segment, namely as an investment adviser, distributor, and administrator to mutual funds, separate accounts, and private investment funds.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits and money market funds.

Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded when they are due and are presented in the balance sheet, net of any allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are written off when they are determined to be uncollectible. Any allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on the Company’s historical losses, existing conditions in the industry, and the financial stability of those individuals or entities that owe the receivable. No allowance for doubtful accounts was deemed necessary at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.

Valuation of Investment Portfolio

Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 — “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), investments held by the Company are valued based upon the definition of Level 1 inputs and Level 2 inputs. In general, SFAS 157 defines Level 1 inputs as fair values which use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are defined as quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable or indirectly through corroboration with observable market data. At June 30, 2009, $3,376,779 and $18,652,426 in Company investments are valued based upon Level 1 and Level 2 inputs, respectively.

The changes in market values on the investments are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income as investment returns.

Limited Partnership Interests

DHCM is the managing member of Diamond Hill General Partner, LLC, the General Partner of Diamond Hill Investment Partners, LP (“DHIP”), Diamond Hill Investment Partners II, LP (“DHIP II”), and Diamond Hill Research Partners, LP (“DHRP”), collectively (the “Partnerships”), each a limited partnership whose underlying assets consist of marketable securities. DHCM in its role as the managing member of the General Partner exerts significant influence over the financial and operating policies of the Partnerships but does not exercise control. Therefore, DHCM’s investment in the Partnerships is accounted for using the equity method, under which DHCM’s share of the net earnings or losses from the partnership is reflected in income as earned, and distributions received are reflected as reductions from the investment. Several board members, officers and employees of the Company invest in DHIP and DHIP II through Diamond Hill General Partner, LLC. These individuals receive no remuneration as a result of their personal investment in the Partnerships. The capital of Diamond Hill General Partner, LLC is not subject to a management fee or an incentive fee.

Furniture and Equipment

Furniture and equipment, consisting of computer equipment, furniture, and fixtures, are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over estimated lives of three to seven years.

Revenue Recognition — General

The Company earns substantially all of its revenue from investment advisory, distribution, and fund administration services. Mutual fund investment advisory and administration fees, generally calculated as a percentage of assets under management, are recorded as revenue as services are performed. Managed account and private investment fund clients provide for monthly or quarterly management fees, in addition to quarterly or annual performance fees.

Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Revenue Recognition — Performance Incentive Revenue

The Company’s private investment funds and certain managed accounts provide for performance incentive fees. EITF Abstract Topic No. D-96, “Accounting for Management Fees Based on a Formula”, identifies two methods by which incentive revenue may be recorded. Under “Method 1”, incentive fees are recorded at the end of the contract period; under “Method 2”, the incentive fees are recorded periodically and calculated as the amount that would be due under the formula at any point in time as if the contract was terminated at that date. Management has chosen Method 1, in which incentive fees are recorded at the end of the contract period for the specific client in which the incentive fee applies. The table below shows assets under management (“AUM”) subject to performance incentive fees and the performance incentive fees as calculated under each of the above methods:

		As Of June 30,
		2009				2008
AUM — Contractual Period Ends Quarterly		$	101,882,369			$	243,704,401
AUM — Contractual Period Ends Annually			74,652,767				324,211,714
Total AUM Subject to Performance Incentive		$	176,535,136			$	567,916,115

		For The Three Months Ending June 30,								For The Six Months Ending June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Performance Incentive Fees - Method 1		$	—			$	97,980			$	4,645			$	378,881
Performance Incentive Fees - Method 2		$	—			$	97,980			$	4,645			$	378,881

Amounts under Method 1 and Method 2 may differ throughout the year, but will generally be the same at fiscal year end because all client account contract periods end on December 31.

Revenue Recognition — Mutual Fund Administration

DHCM has an administrative and transfer agency services agreement with the Diamond Hill Funds (the “Funds”), under which DHCM performs certain services for each fund. These services include mutual fund administration, transfer agency and other related functions. For performing these services, each fund compensates DHCM a fee at an annual rate of 0.34% for Class A and Class C shares and 0.20% for Class I shares times each series’ average daily net assets. Prior to April 30, 2009, the fee for administrative services was 0.30% for Class A and Class C shares and 0.18% for Class I shares. The Funds have selected and contractually engaged certain vendors to fulfill various services to benefit the Funds’ shareholders or to satisfy regulatory requirements of the Funds. These services include, among others, required fund shareholder mailings, registration fees, legal and audit fees. DHCM, in fulfilling a portion of its role under the administration agreement with the Funds, acts as agent to pay these obligations of the Funds. Each vendor is independently responsible for fulfillment of the services it has been engaged to provide and negotiates fees and terms with the management and board of trustees of the Funds. The fee that the Funds pay to DHCM is reviewed annually by the Funds’ board of trustees and specifically takes into account the contractual expenses that DHCM pays on behalf of the Funds. As a result, DHCM is not involved in the delivery or pricing of these services and bears no risk related to these services. Consistent with EITF 99-19, revenue has been recorded net of these Fund expenses. In addition, DHCM finances the up-front commissions which are paid by the Fund’s principal underwriter to brokers who sell Class C shares of the Funds. As financer, DHCM advances to the underwriter the commission amount to be paid to the selling broker at the time of sale. These advances are capitalized and amortized over 12 months to correspond with the re-payments DHCM receives from the principal underwriter to recoup this commission advancement.

Beacon Hill has distribution and administrative service agreements with certain clients. The fees arrangements vary from client to client based upon services provided.

Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Revenue Recognition — Mutual Fund Administration (Continued)

DHCM’s mutual fund administration gross and net revenue and Beacon Hill’s revenue are summarized below:

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
DHCM mutual fund administration:
Revenue, gross		$	1,990,667			$	2,449,128			$	3,749,016			$	4,493,676
Fund related expense			984,879				825,010				1,699,570				1,486,048
Revenue, net of fund related expenses			1,005,788				1,624,118				2,049,446				3,007,628
Beacon Hill revenue			153,177				19,388				241,052				19,388
DHCM C-Share financing:
Broker commission advance repayments			176,015				431,904				523,468				830,851
Broker commission amortization			210,000				434,917				593,594				827,046
Financing activity, net			(33,985	)			(3,013	)			(70,126	)			3,805
Mutual fund administration revenue, net		$	1,124,980			$	1,640,493			$	2,220,372			$	3,030,821

Third Party Distribution Expense

Third party distribution expenses are earned by various third party financial services firms based on sales and/or assets of the Company’s investment products generated by the respective firm. Expenses recognized represent actual payments made to the third party firms and are recorded in the period earned based on the terms of the various contracts.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109 — “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). A net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the various temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 — “Accounting for the Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), an interpretation of SFAS 109. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company has analyzed its tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for all open tax years (tax years ended December 31, 2005 through 2008) and has recognized no adjustment in the net liability.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of EPS that could occur if options and warrants were exercised and restricted stock to issue common stock were vested.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial presentation.

Note 3 Investment Portfolio

As of June 30, 2009, the Company held investments worth $22.0 million and a cost basis of $22.7 million. The following table summarizes the market value of these investments as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund		$	575,265			$	—
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund			616,744				—
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund			547,141				—
Diamond Hill Select Fund			557,903				—
Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund			528,086				—
Diamond Hill Strategic Income Fund			551,640				—
Diamond Hill Investment Partners, L.P.			8,437,066				7,494,929
Diamond Hill Investment Partners II, L.P.			4,248,417				3,767,480
Diamond Hill Research Partners, L.P.			5,966,943				—
Other marketable equity securities			—				5,923,202
Total Investment Portfolio		$	22,029,205			$	17,185,611

DHCM is the managing member of the Diamond Hill General Partner LLC, which is the General Partner of the Partnerships. The underlying assets of the Partnerships are cash and marketable equity securities. The Company, as the parent entity to DHCM, is not contingently liable for the Partnership’s liabilities but rather is only liable for its proportionate share, based on its membership interest. DHCM, as the managing member of the General Partner, is also not contingently liable for the Partnership’s liabilities. Summary financial information, including the Company’s carrying value and income from the Partnerships is as follows:

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
Total partnership assets		$	177,702,483			$	196,021,226
Total partnership liabilities			38,542,317				33,056,747
Net partnership assets			139,160,166				162,964,479
Net partnership income (loss)			13,525,240				(75,625,562	)
DHCM’s portion of net assets			18,652,426				11,262,409
DHCM’s portion of net income (loss)			2,465,019				(3,866,314	)

DHCM’s income from the Partnerships includes its pro-rata capital allocation and its share of an incentive allocation, if any, from the limited partners.

Note 4 Capital Stock

Common Shares

The Company has only one class of securities, Common Shares.

Authorization of Preferred Shares

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred shares with such designations, rights and preferences, as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is authorized, without shareholder approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights, which could adversely affect the voting or other rights of the holders of the Common Shares. There were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.

Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation

Equity Incentive Plans

2005 Employee and Director Equity Incentive Plan

At the Company’s annual shareholder meeting on May 12, 2005, shareholders approved the 2005 Employee and Director Equity Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan is intended to facilitate the Company’s ability to attract and retain staff, provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote the success of the Company’s business. The 2005 Plan authorizes the issuance of Common Shares of the Company in various forms of stock or option grants. As of June 30, 2009, there were 367,049 shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan provides that the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by the Board, may grant awards and otherwise administer the 2005 Plan. Restricted stock grants issued under the plan which vest over time, are recorded as deferred compensation on grant date and then recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the respective grant.

Equity Compensation Grants

On May 13, 2004, the Company’s shareholders approved terms and conditions of certain equity compensation grants to three key employees. Under the approved terms, a total of 75,000 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units were issued to the key employees on May 31, 2004. These shares vested on October 3, 2008.

Accelerated Vesting of Certain Equity Incentive Plans and Compensation Grants

The Board of Directors of the Company approved the accelerated vesting of 82,064 shares of restricted stock from various vesting dates during the first five months of 2009 to October 3, 2008. This acceleration resulted in additional compensation expense of $1.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 that otherwise would have been recorded in the first and second quarters of 2009. In addition, as a result of this acceleration, the Company received a $6.3 million tax deduction in 2008.

Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

401(k) Plan

The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan whereby all employees participate in the plan. Employees may contribute a portion of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The Company makes matching contributions of Common Shares of the Company with a value equal to 200 percent of the first six percent of an employee’s compensation contributed to the plan. Employees become fully vested in the matching contributions after six plan years of employment. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, expenses attributable to the plan were $184,134 and $157,768, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, expenses attributable to the plan were $370,559 and $296,110.

Stock Options and Warrants

Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of stock options, to be recognized as expense in the income statement based on their fair values. The amount of compensation is measured at the fair value of the options when granted, and this cost is expensed over the required service period, which is normally the vesting period of the options. SFAS 123R applies to the Company for options granted or modified after October 1, 2005. SFAS 123R also requires compensation cost to be recorded for prior option grants that vest after the date of adoption.

Stock option and warrant transactions under the various plans are summarized below:

		Options								Warrants
						Weighted Average								Weighted Average
		Shares				Exercise Price				Shares				Exercise Price
Outstanding December 31, 2007			92,500			$	10.40				25,400			$	47.00
Exercisable December 31, 2007			72,500			$	12.03				25,400			$	47.00
Granted			—				—				—				—
Expired / Forfeited			—				—				12,000				73.75
Exercised			27,500				9.15				3,000				56.67
Outstanding June 30, 2008			65,000			$	10.93				10,400			$	13.35
Exercisable June 30, 2008			65,000			$	10.93				10,400			$	13.35
Outstanding December 31, 2008			—			$	—				10,000			$	13.00
Exercisable December 31, 2008			—			$	—				10,000			$	13.00
Granted			—				—				—				—
Expired / Forfeited			—				—				—				—
Exercised			—				—				4,000				16.88
Outstanding June 30, 2009			—			$	—				6,000			$	10.42
Exercisable June 30, 2009			—			$	—				6,000			$	10.42

Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

Stock Options and Warrants (Continued)

Warrants outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2009 are as follows:

Warrants
		Remaining
Number		Life				Number
Outstanding		In Years				Exercisable				Exercise Price
4,000			0.67				4,000			$	11.25
2,000			0.86				2,000				8.75
6,000			0.73				6,000

The aggregate intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2009 is $178,580.

Note 6 Operating Leases

The Company leases approximately 19,000 square feet of office space at its principal office under an operating lease agreement which terminates on July 31, 2016. In addition, the Company leases approximately 2,200 square feet of office space for a subsidiary company under an operating lease agreement which terminates on February 28, 2011. Total lease and operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $113,165 and $97,178, respectively. Total lease and operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $218,890 and $192,630, respectively. The approximate future minimum lease payments under the operating leases are as follows:

2009		2010				2011				2012				2013				Thereafter
$      177,000		$	358,000			$	340,000			$	348,000			$	356,000			$	929,000

In addition to the above rent, the Company will also be responsible for normal operating expenses of the properties. Such operating expenses were approximately $8.90 per square foot in 2008 and are expected to be approximately $9.79 per square foot in 2009 on a combined basis.

Note 7 Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 consists of federal, state and city income taxes. As of December 31, 2008, the Company and its subsidiaries had a capital loss carry forward for tax purposes of approximately $2,072,000. The capital loss carryforward is available to offset capital gains in future years.

Tax Impact of Stock Option and Warrant Exercises

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company received federal tax benefits of $144,764 from the vesting of restricted stock grants, warrants exercised during 2009, and the disqualifying sale related to incentive stock options exercised during 2008, which resulted in an increase to equity during the period. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received federal tax benefits from the exercise of stock-based compensation of $3,805,977, which resulted in an increase to equity.

Note 8 Earnings Per Share

The following table sets for the computation for basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS):

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Basic and Diluted net income		$	4,315,495			$	1,779,374			$	4,667,728			$	3,765,062
Weighted average number of outstanding shares
Basic			2,598,178				2,381,474				2,553,562				2,359,649
Diluted			2,602,637				2,447,151				2,558,119				2,424,601
Earnings per share
Basic		$	1.66			$	0.75			$	1.83			$	1.60
Diluted		$	1.66			$	0.73			$	1.82			$	1.55

Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies

The Company indemnifies its directors and certain of its officers and employees for certain liabilities that might arise from their performance of their duties to the Company. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. Certain agreements do not contain any limits on the Company’s liability and would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred. Therefore, it is not possible to estimate the Company’s potential liability under these indemnities. Further, the Company maintains insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims under these indemnities.

Note 10 Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated subsequent events from June 30, 2009, the date of these financial statements, through August 7, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued and available. There were no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

ITEM 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-looking Statements

Throughout this Form 10-Q, the Company may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 relating to such matters as anticipated operating results, prospects for achieving the critical threshold of assets under management, technological developments, economic trends (including interest rates and market volatility), expected transactions and acquisitions and similar matters. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “hope,” “seek,” “plan,” “intend” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date thereof. While the Company believes that the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors are cautioned that any of the assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and accordingly, the actual results and experiences of the Company could differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed by the Company in its forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause such actual results or experiences to differ from results discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: the adverse effect from a decline in the securities markets; a decline in the performance of the Company’s products; changes in interest rates; a general or prolonged downturn in the economy; changes in government policy and regulation, including monetary policy; changes in the Company’s ability to attract or retain key employees; unforeseen costs and other effects related to legal proceedings or investigations of governmental and self-regulatory organizations; and other risks identified from time-to-time in the Company’s public documents on file with the SEC.

General

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the “Company”), an Ohio corporation organized in 1990, derives its consolidated revenue and net income from primarily investment advisory and fund administration services provided by its subsidiary Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. (“DHCM”). DHCM is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 providing investment advisory services to individuals and institutional investors through the Diamond Hill sponsored mutual funds, separate accounts, and private investment funds (generally known as “hedge funds”). The Company was first incorporated in April 1990. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company incorporated two new subsidiaries, Beacon Hill Fund Services, Inc. (“BHFS”) and BHIL Distributors, Inc. (“BHIL”) to collectively operate as Beacon Hill. Beacon Hill provides certain fund administration services and distribution services to mutual fund companies, including Diamond Hill Funds.

In this section, the Company discusses and analyzes the consolidated results of operations for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009 and 2008 and other factors that may affect future financial performance. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire fiscal year.

The Company’s revenue is derived primarily from investment advisory and administration fees received from Diamond Hill Funds and investment advisory fees received from separate accounts and private investment funds. Investment advisory and administration fees paid to the Company are based primarily on the value of the investment portfolios managed by the Company and fluctuate with changes in the total value of the AUM. Such fees are recognized in the period that the Company manages these assets. The Company can also earn performance incentive fees which are generally 20% annually on the amount of client investment performance in excess of a certain annual return hurdle. Because performance incentive fees are based primarily on the performance of client accounts, they will be volatile from period to period. The Company’s major expense is employee compensation and benefits.

Assets Under Management

As of June 30, 2009, assets under management (“AUM”) totaled $4.7 billion, a 14% decrease in comparison to June 30, 2008. Revenues are highly dependent on both the value and composition of AUM. The following is a summary of the Company’s AUM by product and objective as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and a roll-forward of AUM activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

		Assets Under Management by Product
		As of June 30,
(in millions)		2009				2008				% Change
Mutual funds		$	2,930			$	3,899				-25	%
Separate accounts			1,600				1,146				40	%
Private investment funds			203				441				-54	%
Total		$	4,733			$	5,486				-14	%

		Assets Under Management by Objective
		As of June 30,
(in millions)		2009				2008				% Change
Small and Small-Mid Cap		$	589			$	548				7	%
Large Cap and Select			1,862				1,221				52	%
Long-Short			2,149				3,466				-38	%
Strategic and fixed income			133				251				-47	%
Total		$	4,733			$	5,486				-14	%

		Change in Assets Under Management
		For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)		2009				2008
AUM at beginning of the period		$	4,510			$	4,403
Net cash inflows (outflows)
mutual funds			(269	)			1,223
separate accounts			343				222
private investment funds			(38	)			(44	)
			36				1,401
Net market appreciation (depreciation) and income			187				(318	)
Increase during the period			223				1,083
AUM at end of the period		$	4,733			$	5,486

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of the consolidated results of operations of the Company and its revenues and expenses.

		Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)		2009				2008				% Change				2009				2008				% Change
Net operating income after tax (a)		$	1,664			$	2,649				-37	%		$	3,058			$	4,858				-37	%
Net income		$	4,315			$	1,779				143	%		$	4,668			$	3,765				24	%
Net operating income after tax per share (a)
Basic		$	0.64			$	1.11				-42	%		$	1.20			$	2.06				-42	%
Diluted		$	0.64			$	1.08				-41	%		$	1.20			$	2.00				-40	%
Net income per share
Basic		$	1.66			$	0.75				121	%		$	1.83			$	1.60				14	%
Diluted		$	1.66			$	0.73				127	%		$	1.82			$	1.55				17	%
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic			2,598				2,381								2,554				2,360
Diluted			2,603				2,447								2,558				2,425

Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2008

The Company generated net income of $4,315,495 ($1.66 per diluted share) for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared with net income of $1,779,374 ($0.73 per diluted share) for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Net income increased 143% despite a 14% decrease in AUM due primarily to a positive return on the Company’s corporate investment portfolio of $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the corporate investment return, net operating income after tax decreased $985 thousand, or 37%, for the period primarily due to a 14% decline in AUM and a shift in composition of AUM from long-short strategies, which typically have a higher fee, to long-only strategies.

Revenue

		Three Months Ended
		June 30,
(in thousands)		2009				2008				% Change
Investment advisory		$	8,468			$	10,755				-21	%
Mutual fund administration, net			1,125				1,641				-31	%
Total		$	9,593			$	12,396				-23	%

As a percent of total second quarter 2009 revenues, investment advisory fees accounted for 88% and mutual fund administration fees accounted for the remaining 12% compared to the second quarter of 2008 where investment advisory fees accounted for 87% and mutual fund administration fees accounted for the remaining 13% of revenues.

Investment Advisory Fees. The overall decrease in investment advisory fees was primarily due to a decrease in AUM of just over $753 million period over period and a shift in AUM composition from long-short strategies to long only strategies, which resulted in a lower average advisory fee. Investment advisory fees are calculated as a percent of average net AUM at various levels depending on the investment product. The Company’s average advisory fee rate for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was 0.76% compared to 0.82% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. During the first half of 2009, the Long-Short Fund, which has a 0.90% advisory fee, experienced cash outflows resulting in a decrease in assets for that Fund of 37% from June 30, 2008. This factor contributed to the decrease in the average advisory fee rate for second quarter 2009 compared to second quarter 2008.

Mutual Fund Administration Fees. Mutual fund administration fees are calculated as a percent of average net AUM in the Diamond Hill Funds. The Company earns 0.34% on Class A and Class C shares and 0.20% on Class I shares. Given the decrease in mutual fund AUM experienced during the second half of 2008 through the first quarter of 2009, effective April 30, 2009, the Company increased its administration fees. Prior to April 30, 2009, fees were 0.30% for Class A and Class C shares and 0.18% for Class I shares. Due to a combination of fee changes and a decrease in mutual fund AUM of 25%, fund administration revenues decreased by $516 thousand for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

Expenses

		Three Months Ended
		June 30,
(in thousands)		2009				2008				% Change
Compensation and related costs		$	5,385			$	6,615				-19	%
General and administrative			746				600				24	%
Sales and marketing			137				152				-10	%
Third party distribution			216				396				-45	%
Mutual fund administration			578				577				0	%
Total		$	7,062			$	8,340				-15	%

Compensation and Related Costs. Compensation expense decreased by $1.2 million, or 19%, during the three months ended June 30, 2009 over the same period a year ago. This reflects a decrease in incentive compensation of $1.0 million due to lower revenue and operating income, a decrease of $340 thousand in restricted stock expense for long-term equity awards that vested, and an increase in base salaries and related benefits of $123 thousand due to increased employee headcount.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $146 thousand, or 24%, period over period. This increase is primarily due to additional research expenses to support the Company’s investment team and and additional legal costs incurred during the quarter.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $15 thousand, or 10%. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in travel and other marketing expenses.

Third Party Distribution. Third party distribution expense represents payments made to intermediaries related to sales of the Company’s investment products. The expense is directly correlated with investments in the Company’s private investment funds. The period over period increase or decrease directly corresponds to the increase or decrease in investment advisory fees earned by the Company.

Mutual Fund Administration. Mutual fund administration expense was relatively flat period over period. The majority of mutual fund administration fees are variable based on the amount of mutual fund AUM. Despite the decrease in mutual fund AUM by $969 thousand, or 25%, during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 compared to June 30, 2008, mutual fund administration expenses remained relatively flat due to a fee increase by the sub-administrator and timing differences of certain other administration expenses.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

The Company generated net income of $4,667,728 ($1.82 per diluted share) for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared with net income of $3,765,062 ($1.55 per diluted share) for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net income increased 24% despite a 14% decrease in AUM primarily due to a positive return on the Company’s corporate investment portfolio of $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, offset by a loss from Beacon Hill of $679 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to a negative return in the corporate investment portfolio of $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and a loss from Beacon Hill of $567 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Excluding the corporate investment return, net operating income after tax decreased $1.8 million or 37% for the period primarily due to a 14% decline in AUM and a shift in composition of AUM from long-short strategies, which typically have a higher fee, to long-only strategies.

Revenue

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
(in thousands)		2009				2008				% Change
Investment advisory		$	16,257			$	20,268				-20	%
Mutual fund administration, net			2,220				3,031				-27	%
Total		$	18,477			$	23,299				-21	%

As a percent of 2009 year to date revenues, investment advisory fees accounted for 88% and mutual fund administration fees accounted for the remaining 12% compared to the 2008 period where investment advisory fees accounted for 87% and mutual fund administration fees accounted for 13% of revenues.

Investment Advisory Fees. The overall decrease in investment advisory fees was primarily due to a decrease in AUM of $753 million period over period and a shift in AUM composition from long-short strategies to long only strategies, which resulted in a lower average advisory fee. Investment advisory fees are calculated as a percent of average net AUM at various levels depending on the investment product. The Company’s average advisory fee rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was 0.75% compared to 0.82% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was mainly due to the decrease in AUM in the Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund, which has a 0.90% advisory fee. During the first half of 2009, the Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund, which has a 0.90% advisory fee, experienced cash outflows resulting in a decrease in assets for that Fund of 37% from June 30, 2008. This factor contributed to the decrease in the average advisory fee rate for first half of 2009 compared to first half of 2008.

Mutual Fund Administration Fees. Mutual fund administration fees are calculated as a percent of average net AUM in the Diamond Hill Funds. The Company earns 0.34% on Class A and Class C shares and 0.20% on Class I shares. Given the decrease in mutual fund AUM experienced during the second half of 2008 through the first quarter of 2009, effective April 30, 2009, the Company increased its fees. Prior to April 30, 2009, fees were 0.30% for Class A and Class C shares and 0.18% for Class I shares. Due to a combination of fee changes and a reduction in mutual fund AUM, fund administration revenues decreased by $811 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Expenses

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
(in thousands)		2009				2008				% Change
Compensation and related costs		$	10,523			$	12,456				-16	%
General and administrative			1,392				1,158				20	%
Sales and marketing			283				266				6	%
Third party distribution			464				792				-41	%
Mutual fund administration			1,155				1,046				10	%
Total		$	13,817			$	15,718				-12	%

Compensation and Related Costs. Employee compensation and benefits decreased by $1.9 million, or 16%, during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, reflecting increases in employee headcount, base salaries and related benefits offset by a lower incentive compensation accrual. Base salaries and related benefits increased by $587 thousand, or 11%, reflecting an increase in staffing from 47 to 57 employees. Incentive compensation decreased by $2.5 million, or 36%, reflecting a decrease in both revenue and operating income in the current fiscal year.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $234 thousand, or 20%. This increase is primarily due to additional research expenses to support the Company’s investment team and additional legal costs incurred during the period.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased by $17 thousand, or 6%. This increase was primarily due to an increase in travel and other marketing expenses related to new business growth.

Third Party Distribution. Third party distribution expense represents payments made to intermediaries related to sales of the Company’s investment products. The period over period increase or decrease directly correspond to the increase or decrease in investment advisory fees earned by the Company.

Mutual Fund Administration. Mutual fund administration expense increased by $109 thousand, or 10%. The majority of mutual fund administration fees are variable based on the amount of mutual fund AUM. Despite the decrease in mutual fund AUM by $969 thousand, or 25%, during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to six months ended June 30, 2008, mutual fund administration expenses increased related to a fee increase by the sub-administrator and timing difference of certain other administration expenses.

Beacon Hill Fund Services

Beacon Hill is currently staffed with eight experienced professionals and recently received approval for membership in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) as a limited purpose broker/dealer. Beacon Hill has been actively marketing its services and has commitments from several clients to commence services at various starting dates throughout 2009. Most of these commitments are annually recurring engagements; however, there is no guarantee that the associated revenue will be realized. The Company continues to believe that Beacon Hill will achieve a run rate breakeven by the end of 2009. The following is a summary of Beacon Hill’s performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008:

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Gross revenue		$	187,094			$	19,388			$	290,594			$	19,388
Less: revenue from DHCM			(33,917	)			—				(49,542	)			—
Expenses			435,957				394,690				920,490				586,092
Net loss		$	(282,780	)		$	(375,302	)		$	(679,438	)		$	(566,704	)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s entire investment portfolio is in liquid securities, which provide for cash liquidity, if needed, within three business days. Investments in mutual funds are valued at their current net asset value. Investments in private investment funds and other equity securities are valued based on readily available market quotations. Inflation is expected to have no material impact on the Company’s performance.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company had working capital of approximately $37.8 million compared to $24.1 million at December 31, 2008. Working capital includes cash, securities owned and accounts receivable, net of all liabilities. The Company has no debt and its available working capital is expected to be sufficient to cover current expenses. The Company does not expect any material capital expenditures during 2009.

During the third quarter of 2007 the Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase up to 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Management and the board believe that the most appropriate use for excess cash is to invest in Diamond Hill investment strategies or repurchase the Company’s common stock. The deciding factor will be which alternative offers the most favorable risk-adjusted rate of return in the opinion of management and the board.

Use of Supplemental Data as Non-GAAP Performance Measure

Net Operating Income After Tax

As supplemental information, we are providing performance measures that are based on methodologies other than generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP”) for “Net Operating Income After Tax” that management uses as benchmarks in evaluating and comparing the period-to-period operating performance of the Company and its subsidiaries.

The Company defines “net operating income after tax” as the Company’s net operating income less income tax provision excluding investment return and the tax impact related to the investment return. The Company believes that “net operating income after tax” provides a good representation of the Company’s operating performance as it excludes the impact of investment return on financial results. The amount of the investment portfolio and market fluctuations on the investments can fluctuate significantly from one period to another, as seen over the past year, which can distort the underlying earnings potential of a company. We also believe “net operating income after tax” is an important metric in estimating the value of an asset management business. This measure is provided in addition to net income and net operating income and is not a substitute for net income or net operating income and may not be comparable to non-GAAP performance measures of other companies.

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009				2008				2009				2008
Net Operating Income, GAAP basis		$	2,531,337			$	4,055,628			$	4,659,954			$	7,581,199
Non-GAAP Adjustments:
Tax Provision excluding impact of Investment Return			866,918				1,406,581				1,601,976				2,722,771
Net operating income after tax, non-GAAP basis			1,664,419				2,649,047				3,057,978				4,858,428
Net operating income after tax per diluted share, non-GAAP basis		$	0.64			$	1.08			$	1.20			$	2.00
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding, GAAP basis			2,602,637				2,447,151				2,558,119				2,424,601

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements with any obligation under a guarantee contract, or a retained or contingent interest in assets or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets, or any other obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument or arising out of a variable interest.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”), where the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) became the sole source of authoritative U.S. GAAP for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Company will adopt this standard during the third quarter of 2009. As the Codification is neither expected nor intended to change GAAP, the adoption of SFAS 168 will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements. The adoption of this standard will only result in changes to the Company’s financial statement disclosure references.

There have been no other material changes to the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates provided in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There has been no material change in the information provided in Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company is party to various legal proceedings that are incidental to its business. The Company believes that none of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

ITEM 1A: Risk Factors

There has been no material change to the information provided in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

ITEM 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2009. There remain 333,895 shares available to be purchased under a repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors and announced on August 9, 2007. This stock repurchase program is not subject to an expiration date.

ITEM 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

ITEM 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 21, 2009 at the Founders Club located in Nationwide Arena 200 W. Nationwide Blvd, Columbus, OH 43215. A majority of the Company’s voting shares were present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy.

At such meeting, the shareholders elected the first seven individuals listed below to serve on the Board of Directors for one year terms. Below are the voting results of the meeting.

Name		Votes For				Withheld
Lawrence E. Baumgartner			2,341,725				2,601
R. H. Dillon			2,341,181				3,145
David P. Lauer			2,277,311				67,015
Dr. James G. Mathias			2,321,121				23,205
David R. Meuse			2,331,408				12,918
Diane D. Reynolds			2,327,110				17,216
Donald B. Shackelford			2,310,968				33,358
Tim Eriksen			8,414				—

ITEM 5: Other Information

None

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

ITEM 6: Exhibits

	3.1			Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company. (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K Current Report for the event on May 2, 2002 filed with the SEC on May 7, 2002; File No. 000-24498.)
	3.2			Code of Regulations of the Company. (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K Current Report for the event on May 2, 2002 filed with the SEC on May 7, 2002; File No. 000-24498.)
	31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
	31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
	32.1			Section 1350 Certifications.

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.

Date		Title		Signature
August 7, 2009		President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director		/s/ R. H. Dillon
				R. H. Dillon
August 7, 2009		Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary		/s/ James F. Laird
				James F. Laird

EXHIBIT INDEX

	31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
	31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
	32.1			Section 1350 Certifications.