DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2008
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 1-34033
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 41-1532464 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) |
11001 Bren Road East
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(952) 912-3444
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
On July 31, 2008, there were 25,642,711 shares of the registrants $.01 par value Common Stock
outstanding.
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
Forward-looking Statements |
17 | |||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
Exhibit 3(b) | ||||||||
Exhibit 31(a) | ||||||||
Exhibit 31(b) | ||||||||
Exhibit 32 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per common share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 46,995 | $ | 43,527 | $ | 134,639 | $ | 128,193 | ||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization of purchased
and core technology shown separately below) |
21,200 | 19,392 | 59,729 | 57,257 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of purchased and core technology |
938 | 1,132 | 2,981 | 3,409 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
24,857 | 23,003 | 71,929 | 67,527 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
9,493 | 8,517 | 27,213 | 25,102 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
6,995 | 6,039 | 20,113 | 18,079 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,484 | 3,349 | 11,466 | 10,229 | ||||||||||||
Acquired in-process research & development |
1,900 | | 1,900 | | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
21,872 | 17,905 | 60,692 | 53,410 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
2,985 | 5,098 | 11,237 | 14,117 | ||||||||||||
Interest income, net |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
776 | 872 | 2,850 | 2,444 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(64 | ) | (17 | ) | (90 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||
Total interest income, net |
712 | 855 | 2,760 | 2,385 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
3,697 | 5,953 | 13,997 | 16,502 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
1,712 | (845 | ) | 5,245 | 2,305 | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,985 | $ | 6,798 | $ | 8,752 | $ | 14,197 | ||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.56 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares, basic |
25,742 | 25,294 | 25,683 | 25,186 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares, diluted |
26,079 | 26,152 | 26,353 | 26,032 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
June 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 16,751 | $ | 18,375 | ||||
Marketable securities |
52,877 | 67,111 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
26,032 | 21,022 | ||||||
Inventories |
28,529 | 26,130 | ||||||
Other |
4,885 | 4,961 | ||||||
Total current assets |
129,074 | 137,599 | ||||||
Marketable securities, long-term |
7,921 | 2,081 | ||||||
Property, equipment and improvements, net |
15,382 | 19,987 | ||||||
Identifiable intangible assets, net |
32,951 | 24,214 | ||||||
Goodwill |
82,831 | 66,817 | ||||||
Other |
1,456 | 1,128 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 269,615 | $ | 251,826 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Capital lease obligations, current portion |
$ | 278 | $ | 379 | ||||
Accounts payable |
10,667 | 6,554 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
1,183 | 3,156 | ||||||
Accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Compensation |
5,015 | 7,080 | ||||||
Other |
3,982 | 4,727 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
21,125 | 21,896 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
135 | 358 | ||||||
Income taxes payable long-term |
3,983 | | ||||||
Deferred gain on building sale leaseback |
1,120 | | ||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
7,596 | 6,667 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
33,959 | 28,921 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized;
28,332,658 and 28,153,763 shares issued |
283 | 281 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
176,687 | 172,156 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
75,026 | 66,782 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,492 | 2,121 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,521,147 and 2,606,419 shares |
(17,832 | ) | (18,435 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
235,656 | 222,905 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 269,615 | $ | 251,826 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,752 | $ | 14,197 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation of property, equipment and improvements |
1,894 | 1,878 | ||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets and other assets |
5,033 | 5,769 | ||||||
Gain on sale of property, equipment and improvements |
(94 | ) | | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(177 | ) | (315 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
2,702 | 2,258 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(2,696 | ) | (1,612 | ) | ||||
Acquired in-process research and development |
1,900 | | ||||||
Other |
222 | 18 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding impact of acquisition: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,903 | ) | (1,109 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(924 | ) | (3,543 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
253 | 709 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(156 | ) | (903 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
1,221 | 1,328 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
15,027 | 18,675 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of held-to-maturity marketable securities |
(57,273 | ) | (56,593 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity marketable securities |
65,667 | 55,902 | ||||||
Acquisition of Sarian, Inc., net of cash acquired |
(27,811 | ) | | |||||
Contingent purchase price payments related to prior business acquisitions |
(1,315 | ) | (781 | ) | ||||
Increase in non-current restricted cash |
(392 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sale-leaseback and sale of other property,
equipment, improvements |
6,915 | 17 | ||||||
Purchase of property, equipment, improvements and certain
other intangible assets |
(2,567 | ) | (2,329 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(16,776 | ) | (3,784 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
(293 | ) | (287 | ) | ||||
Borrowing on note payable |
25,000 | | ||||||
Payment on note payable |
(25,000 | ) | | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
177 | 315 | ||||||
Proceeds from stock option plan transactions |
1,679 | 2,433 | ||||||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan transactions |
802 | 954 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
2,365 | 3,415 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(2,240 | ) | 88 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,624 | ) | 18,394 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
18,375 | 15,674 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 16,751 | $ | 34,068 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation
The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q
have been prepared by Digi International Inc. (the Company, Digi, we, our, or us)
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to such rules and regulations.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, including the summary of
significant accounting policies, presented in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed
with the SEC.
The condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments which consist only of normal, recurring adjustments necessary for
a fair statement of the condensed consolidated financial position and the condensed
consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The condensed
consolidated results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of
results for the full year. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited
financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position Emerging
Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per
share (EPS) under the two-class method described in FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
within those years beginning after December 15, 2008 and will be applied retrospectively. We do
not expect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. SFAS
162 is effective 60 days following approval by the SEC of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Boards amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) |
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP SFAS 142-3). FSF SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142).
FSF SFAS 142-3 intends to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flow used to measure the fair value
of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations and other accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December
15, 2008 and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date.
We are currently evaluating the impact of FSP SFAS 142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)). This Statement retained the fundamental requirements in the former Statement that
the acquisition method of accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method) be used
for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business
combination. This Statement defined the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or
more businesses in the business combination and established the acquisition date as the date
that the acquirer achieves control. The new standard requires the acquiring entity in a
business combination to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. This Statement also makes certain other
modifications to the former Statement. SFAS 141(R) is effective for business combinations
that are consummated in our fiscal years beginning October 1, 2009. Early adoption is not
permitted. SFAS 141(R) is expected to have a material impact on how we will identify,
negotiate, and value future acquisitions and how such acquisitions will affect our
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS
159). This Statement provides companies with an option to measure, at specified election
dates, many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
measured at fair value. A company that adopts SFAS 159 will report unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. This Statement also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for us is our fiscal years
beginning October 1, 2008. We do not expect SFAS 159 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements, if we decide to adopt.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-1, Application
of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement Under
Statement 13 (FSP 157-1) and FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude various accounting
pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or
measurement under Statement 13, with the exception of assets or liabilities assumed in a
business combination that are required to be measured at fair value under SFAS 141 or SFAS
141(R). FSP 157-1 is effective upon the adoption of FAS 157. FSP 157-2
defers the effective date of FAS 157 for our fiscal years beginning October 1, 2009 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
The provisions of FAS 157 are effective for our fiscal years beginning October 1, 2008 for
financial assets and financial liabilities. We are currently evaluating the impact of the
provisions of FAS 157, FSP 157-1 and FSP 157-2 on our consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. | NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE |
Basic net income per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common
shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares of our stock result
from dilutive common stock options and shares purchased through the employee stock purchase
plan.
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the net income
per common share calculations (in thousands, except per common share data):
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,985 | $ | 6,798 | $ | 8,752 | $ | 14,197 | ||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic net income per common
share weighted average shares outstanding |
25,742 | 25,294 | 25,683 | 25,186 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options and employee
stock purchase plan |
337 | 858 | 670 | 846 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted net income per common
share adjusted weighted average shares |
26,079 | 26,152 | 26,353 | 26,032 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share, basic |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.56 | ||||||||
Net income per common share, diluted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||||
Potentially dilutive shares related to stock options to purchase 3,751,317 and 2,019,831 common
shares for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and potentially
dilutive shares related to stock options to purchase 595,784 and 1,100,901 common shares for the
three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per common share because the options exercise prices were greater
than the average market price of common shares and, therefore, their effect would be anti-dilutive.
8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and foreign currency translation adjustments.
Foreign currency translation adjustments are charged or credited to accumulated other
comprehensive income within stockholders equity. Comprehensive income was as follows (in
thousands):
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,985 | $ | 6,798 | $ | 8,752 | $ | 14,197 | ||||||||
Foreign currency
translation gain
(loss) |
(1,342 | ) | (154 | ) | (629 | ) | 486 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 643 | $ | 6,644 | $ | 8,123 | $ | 14,683 | ||||||||
4. | ACQUISITIONS |
Sarian Systems, Ltd.
On April 28, 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian), which is now a wholly owned
subsidiary of Digi International Ltd. Prior to the acquisition, Sarian was a privately held
corporation. Sarian is located in the United Kingdom and is a leader in the European wireless
router market. The total purchase price of $30.9 million, including $3.1 million of cash
acquired and $0.4 million of direct acquisition costs, was for all of the outstanding ordinary
shares of Sarian.
The purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. The purchase price allocation resulted in non-deductible goodwill of
$15.4 million and a charge of $1.9 million for acquired in-process research and development.
We believe that the acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because
Sarians wireless IP Routing capability is highly complementary to our market approach and
significantly expands our wireless offering.
Sarians operating results are included in our consolidated results of operations from the
date of acquisition. The consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008 reflects the
allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. This allocation is preliminary, pending the
completion of detailed analyses and outside appraisals of the fair values of the assets
acquired. Once these analyses and appraisals have been completed, the allocation of the
purchase price will be finalized. The table below sets forth the preliminary purchase price
allocation (in thousands):
Cash, including direct acquisition costs |
$ | 30,920 | ||
Fair value of net tangible assets acquired, including cash of $3.1 million |
$ | 4,055 | ||
Identifiable intangible assets: |
||||
Existing purchased and core technology |
7,800 | |||
Existing customer relationships |
4,800 | |||
Trade names |
340 | |||
Non-compete agreements |
300 | |||
In-process research and development |
1,900 | |||
Goodwill |
15,432 | |||
Deferred tax liabilities related to identifiable intangibles |
(3,707 | ) | ||
$ | 30,920 | |||
9
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. | ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED) |
The weighted average useful life for the total of all the identifiable intangibles listed
above is 7.1 years. The weighted average useful life for each intangible asset class is as
follows: purchased and core
technology is 4.7 years, customer relationships is 11.0 years, trade names is 8.5 years and
non-compete agreements is 3.0 years.
Useful lives for identifiable intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based
on the periods of time from which we expect to derive benefits from the identifiable
intangible assets. The identifiable intangible assets, other than customer relationships, are
amortized using the straight-line method which reflects the pattern at which the asset is
consumed. Customer relationships are amortized based upon an accelerated method following
estimated cash flows generated from the intangible asset, whereby more of the amortization is
taken in the early years rather than later years. We do not expect the above intangible
assets to have any significant residual value once they become fully amortized.
At the time of acquisition, Sarian had development projects in process associated with the IPV6,
Gate Array and VPN technologies. We estimated that $1.9 million of the purchase price represented
the fair value of acquired in-process research and development related to the products listed below
(in thousands):
IPV6 |
$ | 1,300 | ||
Gate Array |
400 | |||
VPN technologies |
200 | |||
Total in-process research and development |
$ | 1,900 | ||
These products were under development, had a measurable percentage completed and a documented
expected life, had not yet reached technological feasibility, and had no alternative future uses.
This amount was expensed as a non-tax-deductible charge upon consummation of the acquisition.
We utilized the excess earnings method, a variation of the income approach, to determine the
estimated fair value of the acquired in-process research and development. The estimated values are
based upon the future cash flows to be generated by these in-process research and development
projects over the projected period. These estimates were based on the following assumptions:
| The estimated revenues were based upon our estimate of revenue growth for each of the products over the next ten fiscal years, using the assumption that all revenue recorded after the ten year period will be generated from future technologies. |
| The estimated operating expenses were based on consideration of historical selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales and Sarians projected operating expenses. |
| Maintenance research and development, defined as the research and development necessary to sustain the existing technology and its revenue stream, was also included as an operating expense. The estimated remaining cost to complete each in-process research and development technology was also included in operating expenses. | ||
When applying the excess earnings method, the cash flows expected to be generated by an asset are discounted to their present value equivalent using a rate of return that reflects the relative risk of the investment, as well as the time value of money. This return, known as the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), is an overall rate based upon the individual rates of return for invested capital (equity and interest-bearing debt). The discount rate used in the excess earnings method was 35%. Premiums were added to the WACC to account for the inherent risks in the development of the products, the risks of the products being completed on schedule, and the risk of the eventual sales of the product meeting the expectations of the Company. We used a 35% rate of return for the in-process research and development projects. |
10
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. | ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED) |
We anticipate that all the projects will be completed by the end of calendar year 2008 and are
expected to start generating revenues beginning in calendar year 2009. The estimates
described above are subject to change, given the uncertainties of the development process, and
no assurance can be given that deviations from these estimates will not occur.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations have been prepared
as if the acquisition of Sarian had occurred as of the beginning of fiscal 2007. Pro forma
adjustments include amortization of identifiable intangible assets associated with the Sarian
acquisition. The table below shows the pro forma amounts for net sales, net income and net income
per share (in thousands, except per common share amounts):
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 47,787 | $ | 46,784 | $ | 142,317 | $ | 135,923 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,389 | $ | 6,531 | $ | 7,938 | $ | 13,061 | ||||||||
Net income per common share, basic |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.52 | ||||||||
Net income per common share, diluted |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.50 |
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations are not necessarily
indicative of results that would have occurred had the acquisition occurred as of the
beginning of fiscal 2007, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results that will be
obtained in the future.
FS Forth-Systeme GmbH/Sistemas Embebidos S.A.
Effective April 1, 2005, we acquired FS Forth-Systeme GmbH/Sistemas Embebidos S.A.
(collectively referred to as FS Forth) from Embedded Solutions AG of Germany. The purchase
price of $6.5 million in cash included contingent consideration of $0.8 million paid in
October 2006 and the final payment of $0.9 million, which was paid in October 2007, based on
the achievement of milestones identified in the merger agreement.
5. | SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA (in thousands) |
June 30, 2008 | September 30, 2007 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 26,612 | $ | 21,501 | ||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
580 | 479 | ||||||
$ | 26,032 | $ | 21,022 | |||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 22,446 | $ | 20,097 | ||||
Work in process |
1,748 | 816 | ||||||
Finished goods |
4,335 | 5,217 | ||||||
$ | 28,529 | $ | 26,130 | |||||
Other accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Product warranty accrual |
$ | 1,124 | $ | 1,155 | ||||
Accrued professional fees |
626 | 522 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
2,232 | 2,100 | ||||||
Contingent
purchase price accrual FS Forth |
| 950 | ||||||
$ | 3,982 | $ | 4,727 | |||||
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method.
11
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6.
GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Amortizable identifiable intangible assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2008 | September 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
carrying | Accum. | carrying | Accum. | |||||||||||||||||||||
amount | amort. | Net | amount | amort. | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchased and core technology |
$ | 46,634 | $ | (29,759 | ) | $ | 16,875 | $ | 38,702 | $ | (26,689 | ) | $ | 12,013 | ||||||||||
License agreements |
2,440 | (2,440 | ) | | 2,440 | (2,290 | ) | 150 | ||||||||||||||||
Patents and trademarks |
8,633 | (4,447 | ) | 4,186 | 7,925 | (3,818 | ) | 4,107 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer maintenance contracts |
700 | (446 | ) | 254 | 700 | (394 | ) | 306 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
16,602 | (5,251 | ) | 11,351 | 11,613 | (3,975 | ) | 7,638 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
302 | (17 | ) | 285 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 75,311 | $ | (42,360 | ) | $ | 32,951 | $ | 61,380 | $ | (37,166 | ) | $ | 24,214 | ||||||||||
Amortization expense was $1.5 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and $5.0 million and $5.7 million for the nine months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense related to identifiable intangible assets for the remainder of
fiscal 2008 and the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):
2008 (three months) |
$ | 1,555 | ||
2009 |
6,045 | |||
2010 |
5,480 | |||
2011 |
4,877 | |||
2012 |
4,255 | |||
2013 |
3,508 |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows (in thousands):
Beginning balance, October 1, 2007 |
$ | 66,817 | ||
Acquisition of Sarian |
15,432 | |||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
582 | |||
Ending balance, June 30, 2008 |
$ | 82,831 | ||
7. | INCOME TAXES |
Income taxes have been provided for at an effective rate of 46.3% and 37.5% for the three and nine
month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to an effective rate of (14.2%) and 14.0%
for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
Income tax expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2008 includes a net discrete tax benefit of $0.2
million resulting from a reversal of previously established tax reserves associated with the
closing of a tax year. In the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we recorded discrete tax benefits of
$2.9 million, of which $2.3 million resulted
from the reversal of previously established income tax reserves that were no longer required as a
result of the closing of a domestic tax return. In addition, we completed a foreign tax audit in
the third quarter of 2007 and reversed $0.6 million in income tax reserves that had been previously
established and were no longer required.
12
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. | INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED) |
During the first quarter of 2007, Congress passed H.R. 6111, the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of
2006, which included an extension of the research credit that previously expired on December 31,
2005. As a result of the extension, we recorded a discrete income tax benefit of $0.5 million in
the first quarter of fiscal 2007 for research and development credits earned during the last three
fiscal quarters of 2006.
The $1.9 million charge that was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 for in-process
research and development was non-deductible. This non-deductible charge, along with the above
discrete tax events, affected our effective tax rates as shown in the table below:
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Effective tax rate before impact of discrete tax
events & non-deductible in-process research
and development |
37.3 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.1 | % | 36.1 | % | ||||||||
Impact of non-deductible in-process research and
development charge |
14.4 | % | 0.0 | % | 3.8 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Impact of discrete tax events |
-5.4 | % | -49.2 | % | -1.4 | % | -22.1 | % | ||||||||
Effective tax rate |
46.3 | % | -14.2 | % | 37.5 | % | 14.0 | % | ||||||||
The effective tax rate before the impact of discrete tax events and non-deductible in-process
research and development charge for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately
equal to the U.S. statutory rate of 35%.
Effective October 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). As a result of our
adoption of FIN 48, we recognized an increase in our existing liabilities for unrecognized tax
benefits of $1.1 million and additional deferred tax assets of $0.6 million, with an offsetting
cumulative effect adjustment resulting in a decrease to the opening balance of retained earnings of
$0.5 million. At the adoption date, we had $3.5 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits and
accrued interest and penalties of $0.5 million. If all of our unrecognized tax benefits were
recognized, approximately $3.5 million would impact our effective tax rate. In conjunction with
our adoption of FIN 48, we reclassified $4.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits as a long-term
liability as we do not expect significant payments to occur over the next 12 months. We have
elected to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we reduced our unrecognized tax benefits for a $0.2
million discrete item mentioned above, offset by an increase in the unrecognized tax benefit for
interest accrued on prior periods benefits of $0.2 million.
We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as income tax returns in various
state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal,
state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by taxing authorities for years prior to
fiscal 2004. Although the timing and resolution of
potential tax audits is uncertain, we do not believe it is reasonably possible that the total
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will materially change in the next 12 months.
13
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. | FINANCIAL GUARANTEES |
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service for a period of up to five years from the date of receipt. We have the
option to repair or replace products we deem defective with regard to material or workmanship.
Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related revenue is recognized
based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied to the estimated
number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical warranty incidence
and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty reserve. The
following table summarizes the activity associated with the product warranty accrual (in
thousands):
Three months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Warranties | Settlements | Balance at | |||||||||||||
April 1 | issued | made | June 30 | |||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 1,133 | $ | 218 | $ | (227 | ) | $ | 1,124 | |||||||
2007 |
$ | 1,006 | $ | 176 | $ | (223 | ) | $ | 959 |
Nine months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Warranties | Settlements | Balance at | |||||||||||||
October 1 | issued (1) | made | June 30 | |||||||||||||
2008 |
$ | 1,155 | $ | 576 | $ | (607 | ) | $ | 1,124 | |||||||
2007 |
$ | 1,104 | $ | 485 | $ | (630 | ) | $ | 959 |
(1) | Warranties issued include a decrease in estimate adjustment of $132,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. |
We are not responsible and do not warrant that custom software versions created by original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers based upon our software source code will function in a
particular way, will conform to any specifications or are fit for any particular purpose and
do not indemnify these customers from any third-party liability as it relates to or arises
from any customization or modifications made by the OEM customer.
9. | CONTINGENCIES |
Legal Proceedings
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims relating to the
initial public offering (IPO) of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately 300 other
public companies. The complaint names us as defendants along with NetSilicon, certain of its
officers and certain underwriters involved in NetSilicons IPO, among numerous others, and
asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO prospectus and registration statement
violated federal securities laws because they contained material misrepresentations and/or
omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters in allocating shares in
NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers. We believe that the claims against the
NetSilicon defendants are without merit and have defended the litigation vigorously. Pursuant
to a stipulation between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed from the lawsuit,
without prejudice, on October 9, 2002.
14
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. | CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED) |
In June 2003, we elected to participate in a proposed settlement agreement with the plaintiffs
in this litigation. Had it been approved by the Court, this proposed settlement would have
resulted in a dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims in the litigation against us and
against any of the other issuer defendants who elected to participate in the proposed
settlement, together with the current or former officers and directors of participating
issuers who were named as individual defendants. This proposed settlement was conditioned on,
among other things, a ruling by the District Court that the claims against NetSilicon and
against the other issuers who had agreed to the settlement would be certified for class action
treatment for purposes of the proposed settlement, such that all investors included in the
proposed classes in these cases would be bound by the terms of the settlement unless an
investor opted to be excluded from the settlement in a timely and appropriate fashion.
On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in
In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation that six purported class action
lawsuits containing allegations substantially similar to those asserted against us could not
be certified as class actions due, in part, to the Court of Appeals determination that
individual issues of reliance and knowledge would predominate over issues common to the
proposed classes. On January 8, 2007, the plaintiffs filed a petition seeking rehearing
en banc of this ruling. On April 6, 2007 the Court of Appeals denied the
plaintiffs petition for rehearing of the Courts December 5, 2006 ruling. The Court of
Appeals, however, noted that the plaintiffs remained free to ask the District Court to certify
classes different from the ones originally proposed which might meet the standards for class
certification that the Court of Appeals articulated in its December 5, 2006 decision. The
plaintiffs have since moved for certification of different classes in the District Court, and
that motion remains pending.
In light of the Court of Appeals December 5, 2006 decision regarding certification of the
plaintiffs claims, the District Court entered an order on June 25, 2007 terminating the
proposed settlement between the plaintiffs and the issuers, including NetSilicon. Because any
possible future settlement with the plaintiffs, if a settlement were ever to be negotiated and
ultimately agreed to, would involve the certification of a class action for settlement
purposes, the impact of the Court of Appeals rulings on the possible future settlement of the
claims against NetSilicon is uncertain.
On August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed amended complaints in the six focus cases. The
issuer defendants and the underwriter defendants separately moved to dismiss the claims
against them in the amended complaints in the six focus cases. On March 26, 2008, the
District Court issued an order in which it denied in substantial part the motions to dismiss
the amended complaints in the six focus cases. In addition, on October 1, 2007, the
plaintiffs submitted their briefing in support of their motions to certify different classes
in the six focus cases. The issuer defendants and the underwriter defendants filed separate
oppositions to those motions on December 21, 2007. The motions to certify classes in the six
focus cases remain pending.
15
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. | CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED) |
We intend to continue to defend the litigation vigorously. The litigation process is
inherently uncertain and unpredictable, however, and there can be no guarantee as to the
ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit. We maintain liability insurance for such matters
and expect that the liability insurance will be adequate to cover any potential unfavorable
outcome, less the applicable deductible amount of $250,000 per claim. As of June 30, 2008, we
have accrued a liability for the deductible amount of $250,000 which we believe reflects the
amount of loss that is probable. In the event we have losses that exceed the limits of the
liability insurance, such losses could have a material effect on our business and our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In addition to the matter discussed above, in the normal course of business, we are subject to
various claims and litigation, including patent infringement and intellectual property claims.
Our management expects that these various claims and litigation will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
10. | SALE AND LEASEBACK OF BUILDING |
On February 18, 2008, we entered into a contract for the sale of our building in Dortmund,
Germany, and subsequent partial leaseback for a five year term (the Agreement). Upon the
closing of the transaction in March 2008, we initiated the leaseback of approximately 40% of
the property for a period of five years, with a renewal option for an additional five years.
The building was sold for 4.5 million Euros (equivalent to $6.9 million), resulting in a gain
on the sale of 1.0 million Euros ($1.6 million). As a result of the leaseback, $1.5 million
of the gain on the sale was deferred and is being recognized ratably over the lease term as an
offset to rent expense. The remaining $0.1 million was recognized in the second quarter of
fiscal 2008 as a component of general and administrative expense. Of the total sale price,
4.2 million Euros ($6.5 million) was received during March 2008 and the remaining 0.3 million
Euros ($0.4 million) was received in April 2008. We were required, as part of the Agreement,
to deposit 0.3 million Euros ($0.4 million) into an interest-bearing bank account, which will
be refunded to us at the end of the lease term. This deposit was made during March 2008 and
is included in other noncurrent assets as restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheet as
of June 30, 2008.
11. | SHORT-TERM LOAN |
On April 22, 2008, we entered into a short-term loan agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in
the amount of $25.0 million. This short-term loan was used to finance the Sarian acquisition
(see Note 4). Interest was based on a one-month fixed LIBOR rate at the first day of the loan
plus 0.30% until May 23, 2008, at which time the rate was changed to a daily LIBOR rate plus
0.30% and ranged between 2.41% and 3.20% from the date of the loan through May 29, 2008. Per
the terms of the agreement, payment of the outstanding balance was due November 30, 2008;
however, we had the option to prepay without penalty. In May 2008, we repaid the entire
$25.0 million utilizing the proceeds from the sales of our marketable securities upon
maturity.
12. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
On July 23, 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum) as a wholly owned
subsidiary of Digi International Inc. Prior to the acquisition, Spectrum was a privately held
Minneapolis-based corporation and a leading wireless design services organization. The
acquisition was a cash merger for approximately $10.0 million of which $4.0 million was paid
on the acquisition date, $3.0 million will be paid in January 2010, and the remaining $3.0
million will be paid in July 2011.
As part of the previously announced stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of
Directors, we announced, on July 23, 2008, the authorization of an additional 500,000 shares
of common stock for repurchase. The total number of shares authorized for repurchase is now
1,500,000 shares.
16
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements as that term
is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The words believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, target, may, will, expect,
plan, project, should, or continue or the negative thereof or other expressions, which
are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical
matters, identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on information
available to our management as of the time of such statements and relate to, among other
things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of our
future performance, perceived opportunities in the market and statements regarding our mission
and vision. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ
materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied
by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Our operating results and performance trends may be affected by a number of factors,
including, without limitation, those described under Item 1A, Risk Factors in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007. Those risk factors, and other
risks, uncertainties and assumptions identified from time to time in our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q and our registration statements, could cause our actual future results to differ
from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in
our various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and of changes in general
economic conditions, changes in interest rates and/or exchange rates and changes in the
assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A description of our critical accounting policies was provided in the Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007. An update to our critical accounting policy
related to goodwill is included below.
We performed our annual goodwill impairment assessment in the third quarter of fiscal 2008.
Based on our analysis, we conclude that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeds the
carrying amount and therefore goodwill is not considered impaired. When the assessment was
performed, our market capitalization, which is an indicator of fair value, was below the
carrying value of our reporting unit due to significant declines in our stock price during the
year. However, an estimated control premium was also used in our determination of fair value.
The control premium represents the amount an investor would pay, over and above market
capitalization, in order to obtain a controlling interest in a company. Therefore, the fair
value of our reporting unit was measured using our market capitalization as of June 30, 2008,
plus a control premium. The estimated control premium was determined by a review of premiums
paid for similar companies over the past five years. The control premium used in our
determination of fair value is subject to management judgment, including the interpretation of
current economic indicators and market valuations as well as our strategic plans with regard
to our operations. To the extent additional information
arises or our strategies change, it is possible that our conclusion regarding goodwill
impairment could change, which could have a material effect on our financial position and
results of operations.
17
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(CONTINUED)
OVERVIEW
We operate in the communications technology industry, which is characterized by rapid
technological advances and evolving industry standards. The market can be significantly
affected by new product introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. We
compete for customers on the basis of existing and planned product features, company
reputation, brand recognition, technical support, relationships with partners, quality and
reliability, product development capabilities, price and availability.
We help customers connect, monitor, and control local or remote electronic devices over a
network or via the Internet. We continue to leverage a common core technology base to develop
and provide innovative connectivity solutions to our customers. Our Drop-In Networking
solutions initiative, which is based on our wireless solutions, provides end-to-end wireless
connectivity to electronic devices in locations where wires do not work or cannot be used.
This initiative provides opportunities for connecting devices and machines. Incorporating
products from both our embedded and non-embedded categories, including modules, wireless
communications adapters, cellular routers, gateways, sensors, and network management software,
as well as other design services, Drop-in Networking holds the potential to economically
extend network connectivity to millions of new devices.
We anticipate that growth in the future will result from both products and services that are
developed internally as well as from products and services that are acquired.
Net sales of $47.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 represented an increase of $3.5 million, or 8.0%, compared to net sales of $43.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian), which was acquired on April 28, 2008, provided $2.4 million of revenue from Sarian-branded products for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Revenue in North America was $26.1 million in the third fiscal quarter of 2008 compared to $27.9 million in the same period a year ago, a decrease of $1.8 million, or 6.6%, primarily due to the slowing of the U.S. economy and a decrease in revenue from certain key customers. International revenue was $20.9 million in the third fiscal quarter of 2008 compared to $15.6 million in the third fiscal quarter of 2007, an increase of $5.3 million, or 34.1%, of which $2.4 million was from revenue from Sarian-branded products. |
Gross profit margin increased to 52.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to 52.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Gross profit margin increased to 53.4% for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to 52.7% for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in gross profit margin for both the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to reduced amortization of purchased and core technology due to certain technologies becoming fully amortized and favorable product mix changes within both the embedded and non-embedded product groups, offset by a decrease due to Sarian-branded products which provide lower gross profit margins than our other product lines. |
18
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(CONTINUED)
OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
Total operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $21.9 million, or 46.5% of net sales, compared to $17.9 million, or 41.1% of net sales, for the three months ended June 31, 2007, an increase of $4.0 million. Total operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 were $60.7 million, or 45.1% of net sales, compared to $53.4 million, or 41.7% of net sales, for the nine months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $7.3 million. Operating expenses increased by 22.2% and 13.6% for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007 due mostly to a charge of $2.1 million for in-process research and development and other acquisition-related expenses, as well as incremental ongoing operating expenses for Sarian from the date of acquisition of $0.6 million both of which were incurred during the three month period ended June 30, 2008. In addition, operating expenses increased as a result of our Drop-In Networking initiative. |
Net income decreased $4.8 million to $2.0 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $6.8 million, or $0.26 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net income decreased $5.4 million to $8.8 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $14.2 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. |
Our net working capital position (total current assets less total current liabilities) decreased $7.8 million to $107.9 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and our current ratio was 6.1 to 1 as of that date. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities decreased $15.9 million to $69.6 million during the nine month period which includes payments of $27.8 million, net of cash acquired of $3.1 million, for the acquisition of Sarian, offset by 4.5 million Euros ($6.9 million) received from the building sale in Dortmund, Germany. At June 30, 2008, we had no debt other than capital lease obligations. |
19
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected information derived from our interim condensed
consolidated statements of operations expressed in dollars, as a percentage of net sales and
as a percentage of change from period-to-period for the periods indicated (dollars in
thousands):
Three months ended June 30, | % increase | Nine months ended June 30, | % increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | 2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 46,995 | 100.0 | % | $ | 43,527 | 100.0 | % | 8.0 | % | $ | 134,639 | 100.0 | % | $ | 128,193 | 100.0 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of
amortization of purchased and core
technology shown separately below) |
21,200 | 45.1 | 19,392 | 44.6 | 9.3 | 59,729 | 44.4 | 57,257 | 44.7 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of purchased and
core technology |
938 | 2.0 | 1,132 | 2.6 | (17.1 | ) | 2,981 | 2.2 | 3,409 | 2.6 | (12.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
24,857 | 52.9 | 23,003 | 52.8 | 8.1 | 71,929 | 53.4 | 67,527 | 52.7 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
9,493 | 20.2 | 8,517 | 19.6 | 11.5 | 27,213 | 20.2 | 25,102 | 19.6 | 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
6,995 | 14.9 | 6,039 | 13.8 | 15.8 | 20,113 | 15.0 | 18,079 | 14.1 | 11.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,484 | 7.4 | 3,349 | 7.7 | 4.0 | 11,466 | 8.5 | 10,229 | 8.0 | 12.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-process research
and development |
1,900 | 4.0 | | 0.0 | N/A | 1,900 | 1.4 | | 0.0 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
21,872 | 46.5 | 17,905 | 41.1 | 22.2 | 60,692 | 45.1 | 53,410 | 41.7 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
2,985 | 6.4 | 5,098 | 11.7 | (41.4 | ) | 11,237 | 8.3 | 14,117 | 11.0 | (20.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income and other, net |
712 | 1.5 | 855 | 2.0 | (16.7 | ) | 2,760 | 2.1 | 2,385 | 1.9 | 15.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
3,697 | 7.9 | 5,953 | 13.7 | (37.9 | ) | 13,997 | 10.4 | 16,502 | 12.9 | (15.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1,712 | 3.6 | (845 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (302.6 | ) | 5,245 | 3.9 | 2,305 | 1.8 | 127.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,985 | 4.2 | % | $ | 6,798 | 15.6 | % | (70.8 | )% | $ | 8,752 | 6.5 | % | $ | 14,197 | 11.1 | % | (38.4) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES
The following summarizes our net sales for the periods indicated:
Three months ended June 30, | % increase | Nine months ended June 30, | % increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | 2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-embedded |
$ | 26,325 | 56.0 | % | $ | 24,750 | 56.9 | % | 6.4 | % | $ | 71,540 | 53.1 | % | $ | 74,361 | 58.0 | % | (3.8) | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Embedded |
20,670 | 44.0 | 18,777 | 43.1 | 10.1 | 63,099 | 46.9 | 53,832 | 42.0 | 17.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 46,995 | 100.0 | % | $ | 43,527 | 100.0 | % | 8.0 | % | $ | 134,639 | 100.0 | % | $ | 128,193 | 100.0 | % | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
Revenue from non-embedded products includes all Sarian-branded revenue of $2.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from the date of acquisition. Net sales of non-embedded
products for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in the prior
year resulted in an increase of 6.4%, primarily from Sarian products, offset by decreases of
net sales of serial cards, serial server, and USB products. The decrease in net sales in the
non-embedded products for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods
in the prior year resulted primarily from decreased net sales of serial
cards, serial server, USB and cellular products. The decreases are primarily a result of the
slowing of the U.S. economy. The decline in net sales of non-embedded products was a result
of declines in the North American region and was partially offset by increases in
international net sales.
Net sales of most of the embedded products increased in the three and nine months ended June
30, 2008 compared to the comparable prior periods. Most of the increase in our embedded net
sales took place in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) and Asia Pacific. While embedded
net sales increased slightly in the North American region, we believe the slowing of the U.S.
economy, particularly in the second and third quarters of fiscal 2008, negatively impacted the
growth.
The following summarizes our net sales by geographic region:
Three months ended June 30, | $ increase | % increase | Nine months ended June 30, | $ increase | % increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | (decrease) | 2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 26,131 | $ | 27,968 | $ | (1,837 | ) | (6.6) | % | $ | 78,214 | $ | 83,541 | $ | (5,327 | ) | (6.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||
EMEA |
14,503 | 10,657 | 3,846 | 36.1 | 38,432 | 30,555 | 7,877 | 25.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
5,075 | 3,817 | 1,258 | 33.0 | 14,225 | 11,031 | 3,194 | 29.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latin America |
1,286 | 1,085 | 201 | 18.5 | 3,768 | 3,066 | 702 | 22.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 46,995 | $ | 43,527 | $ | 3,468 | 8.0 | % | $ | 134,639 | $ | 128,193 | $ | 6,446 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Fluctuation in foreign currency rates, primarily the Euro, for the three and nine month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year had a favorable
impact on net sales of $0.8 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $24.9 million, or 52.9%,
and $71.9 million, or 53.4%, respectively, compared to $23.0 million, or 52.8%, and $67.5
million, or 52.7%, for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. Gross
profit margin increased by 0.1% and 0.7% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 as
compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in gross profit margin for both
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily due to reduced amortization of
purchased and core technology due to certain technologies becoming fully amortized and
favorable product mix changes within both the embedded and non-embedded product groups, offset
by a decrease due to Sarian-branded products which provide lower gross profit margins than our
other product lines.
We anticipate that our gross profit margins for the remainder of the fiscal year will be in a
range of 52 to 54 percent which includes estimated amortization of purchased and core
technology of approximately two percentage points.
21
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
OPERATING EXPENSES
Three months ended June 30, | $ increase | Nine months ended June 30, | $ increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | 2008 | 2007 | (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 9,493 | 20.2 | % | $ | 8,517 | 19.6 | % | $ | 976 | $ | 27,213 | 20.2 | % | $ | 25,102 | 19.6 | % | $ | 2,111 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
6,995 | 14.9 | 6,039 | 13.8 | 956 | 20,113 | 15.0 | 18,079 | 14.1 | 2,034 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,484 | 7.4 | 3,349 | 7.7 | 135 | 11,466 | 8.5 | 10,229 | 8.0 | 1,237 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-process
research and development |
1,900 | 4.0 | | 0.0 | 1,900 | 1,900 | 1.4 | | 0.0 | 1,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 21,872 | 46.5 | % | $ | 17,905 | 41.1 | % | $ | 3,967 | $ | 60,692 | 45.1 | % | $ | 53,410 | 41.7 | % | $ | 7,282 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The net increase of $1.0 million in sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, as compared to June 30, 2007, was primarily due to $0.4 million of incremental
ongoing expenses of Sarian, an increase of $0.3 million for compensation-related expenses and
$0.2 million for additional ad placement costs and commissions. For the nine months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007, the net increase in expenses was $2.1 million due
primarily to $0.4 million of incremental ongoing expenses of Sarian, an increase of $1.0
million of compensation-related expenses due to increased headcount primarily related to the
Drop-In Networking initiative and $0.4 million of additional ad placement and marketing
literature expenses.
The net increase of $1.0 million in research and development expenses for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007 was due primarily to $0.4 million of various
development projects, a net increase of $0.2 million for compensation-related expenses and
$0.3 million of outside service expense primarily for certification of wireless products
including Sarian products. Research and development expenses for the nine months ended June
30, 2008 increased $2.0 million compared to the same period a year ago due primarily to an
increase of $1.0 million in compensation-related expenses primarily for the Drop-In Networking
initiative, $0.5 million in outside service expense primarily for certification of wireless
products including Sarian products and $0.2 million for various development projects.
The net increase in general and administrative expenses of $0.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 is primarily due to $0.3
million of incremental ongoing expenses of Sarian, offset by a $0.3 million reduction in
amortization expenses as certain intangible assets became fully amortized. For the nine
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007, the net increase in general and
administrative expenses of $1.2 million was due primarily to $0.3 million of incremental
ongoing expenses of Sarian, an increase in compensation-related expenses of $0.7 million and
increased professional fees and outside services of $0.5 million, offset by a reduction in
amortization expense of $0.3 million and $0.1 million recognized gain on the sale of the
Dortmund Building (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Fluctuation in foreign currency rates, primarily the Euro, for the three and nine month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the prior year had an unfavorable
impact on operating expenses of $0.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
22
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
INTEREST INCOME AND OTHER, NET
Interest income and other, net was $0.7 million and $2.8 million for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $0.9 million and $2.4 million for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2007, respectively. We realized interest income on marketable securities and
cash and cash equivalents of $0.8 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and $0.9 million and $2.4 million for the three and nine month periods
ended June 30, 2007, respectively, due to an increase in the average invested balance. We
earned an average interest rate of 4.2% and 4.6% for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2008, respectively, compared to 5.1% for both the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007.
The average invested balance for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $72.6
million and $80.6 million, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007
was $70.4 million and $62.6 million, respectively.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes have been provided for at an effective rate of 46.3% and 37.5% for the three and nine
month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to an effective rate of (14.2%) and 14.0%
for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
Income tax expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2008 includes a net discrete tax benefit of $0.2
million resulting from a reversal of previously established tax reserves associated with the
closing of a tax year. In the third quarter of fiscal 2007, we recorded discrete tax benefits of
$2.9 million, of which $2.3 million resulted from the reversal of previously established income tax
reserves that were no longer required as a result of the closing of a domestic tax return. In
addition, we completed a foreign tax audit in the third quarter of 2007 and reversed $0.6 million
in income tax reserves that had been previously established and were no longer required.
During the first quarter of 2007, Congress passed H.R. 6111, the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of
2006, which included an extension of the research credit that previously expired on December 31,
2005. As a result of the extension, we recorded a discrete income tax benefit of $0.5 million in
the first quarter of fiscal 2007 for research and development credits earned during the last three
fiscal quarters of 2006.
The $1.9 million charge that was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 for in-process
research and development was non-deductible. This non-deductible charge, along with the above
discrete tax events, affected our effective tax rates as shown in the table below:
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Effective tax rate before impact of discrete tax events &
non-deductible in-process research and development |
37.3 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.1 | % | 36.1 | % | ||||||||
Impact of non-deductible in-process research and
development charge |
14.4 | % | 0.0 | % | 3.8 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Impact of discrete tax events |
-5.4 | % | -49.2 | % | -1.4 | % | -22.1 | % | ||||||||
Effective tax rate |
46.3 | % | -14.2 | % | 37.5 | % | 14.0 | % | ||||||||
The effective tax rate before the impact of discrete tax events and non-deductible in-process
research and development charge for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately
equal to the U.S. statutory rate of 35%.
23
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
We expect our annualized 2008 income tax rate to be approximately 37% 39%, which includes the
impact, for tax purposes, of the non-deductible in-process research and development expenses of
approximately $1.9 million related to the acquisition of Sarian.
Effective October 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). We further discuss
the adoption of FIN 48 in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed our operations principally with funds generated from operations. At June 30,
2008, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $69.6 million,
compared to $85.5 million at September 30, 2007, a decrease of $15.9 million. Our working
capital (total current assets less total current liabilities) decreased $7.8 million to $107.9
million at June 30, 2008 compared to $115.7 million at September 30, 2007.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow Highlights (in thousands)
Nine months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 15,027 | $ | 18,675 | $ | (3,648 | ) | |||||
Investing activities |
(16,776 | ) | (3,784 | ) | (12,992 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities |
2,365 | 3,415 | (1,050 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
and cash equivalents |
(2,240 | ) | 88 | (2,328 | ) | |||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (1,624 | ) | $ | 18,394 | $ | (20,018 | ) | ||||
Reconciliation of Net Income to Cash Inflows (Outflows) from Operating Activities (in thousands)
Nine months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | Change | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,752 | $ | 14,197 | $ | (5,445 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
(2,696 | ) | (1,612 | ) | (1,084 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
6,927 | 7,647 | (720 | ) | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
2,702 | 2,258 | 444 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(177 | ) | (315 | ) | 138 | |||||||
Gain on sale of property, equipment and improvements |
(94 | ) | | (94 | ) | |||||||
Acquired in-process research and development |
1,900 | | 1,900 | |||||||||
Other reconciling items |
222 | 18 | 204 | |||||||||
Net income adjusted for non-cash expenses |
17,536 | 22,193 | (4,657 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in working capital, excluding impact of
acquisition |
(2,509 | ) | (3,518 | ) | 1,009 | |||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 15,027 | $ | 18,675 | $ | (3,648 | ) | |||||
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
Net cash provided by operating activities was $15.0 million and $18.7 million for the nine
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, resulting in a net cash decrease of $3.7
million. This net decrease is primarily due to a decrease of $5.4 million of net income,
offset by net increases in non-cash expenses of $0.7 million as described in the table above.
In addition, net cash increased by $1.0 million due to a change in working capital for the
comparable nine month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, primarily due to a net increase
due to inventory of $2.6 million and a net increase of $0.7 million related to accounts
payable due to timing of material receipts and the related supplier payments. This was offset
by a net increase in accounts receivable balances of $1.8 million as of June 30, 2008 compared
to the prior comparable period due to a slowdown in customer payments and a net decrease of
$0.5 million related to increased inventory balances at June 30, 2008.
Net cash used in investing activities was $16.8 million and $3.8 million during the nine
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 resulting in a $13.0 million decrease in cash flow. The
decrease is primarily due to the acquisition of Sarian for $27.8 million (purchase price of
$30.9 million, net of cash acquired of $3.1 million), $0.4 million related to the deposit for
the Dortmund building leaseback, a net reduction of $0.5 million of contingent purchase price
payments related to the FS Forth acquisition and additional purchases of $0.2 million of
property, equipment, improvements and certain other intangible assets. This was offset by
$6.9 million proceeds from the sale-leaseback of our building in Dortmund, Germany (see Note
10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and $9.0 million increase in sales of marketable
securities, net of purchases. We anticipate total fiscal 2008 capital expenditures to
approximate $3.5 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.4 million and $3.4 million during the nine
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 resulting in a $1.0 million decrease in cash flow,
primarily as a result of proceeds from stock option and employee stock purchase plan
transactions in both periods, and the reflection of cash provided by the excess tax benefits
related to the exercise of stock options.
Management believes that current financial resources, cash generated from operations and our
potential capacity for additional debt and/or equity financing will be sufficient to fund
operations for at least the next twelve months. During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we
entered into a $25.0 million short-term loan of which the full $25.0 million was repaid during
the same quarter (see Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). We
determined that it was more economical to borrow funds to finance the Sarian acquisition than
to liquidate marketable securities prior to their scheduled maturities.
In conjunction with our adoption of FIN 48, we reclassified the portion of our unrecognized
tax benefits that we do not expect to pay in cash over the next 12 months from a short-term
liability to a long-term liability. All of our liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits are
recorded as a long-term liability as we do not expect significant payments to occur over the
next 12 months. Further information concerning the adoption of FIN 48 is included in Note 7
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
25
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position Emerging
Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per
share (EPS) under the two-class method described in FASB
Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2008
and will be applied retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. SFAS
162 is effective 60 days following approval by the SEC of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Boards amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP SFAS 142-3). FSF SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142).
FSF SFAS 142-3 intends to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flow used to measure the fair value
of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations and other accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December
15, 2008 and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date.
We are currently evaluating the impact of FSP SFAS 142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)). This Statement retained the fundamental requirements in the former Statement that
the acquisition method of accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method) be used
for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business
combination. This Statement defined the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or
more businesses in the business combination and established the acquisition date as the date
that the acquirer achieves control. The new standard requires the acquiring entity in a
business combination to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. This Statement also makes certain other
modifications to the former Statement. SFAS 141(R) is effective for business combinations
that are consummated in our fiscal years beginning October 1, 2009. Early adoption is not
permitted. SFAS 141(R) is expected to have a material impact on how we will identify,
negotiate, and value future acquisitions and how such acquisitions will affect our
consolidated financial statements.
26
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS
159). This Statement provides companies with an option to measure, at specified election
dates, many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently
measured at fair value. A company that adopts SFAS 159 will report unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. This Statement also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different
measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This Statement is
effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, which for us is our fiscal years beginning October 1, 2008.
We do not expect SFAS 159 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements,
if we decide to adopt.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-1, Application
of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement Under
Statement 13 (FSP 157-1) and FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude various accounting
pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or
measurement under Statement 13, with the exception of assets or liabilities assumed in a
business combination that are required to be measured at fair value under SFAS 141 or SFAS
141(R). FSP 157-1 is effective upon the adoption of FAS 157. FSP 157-2 defers the effective
date of FAS 157 for our fiscal years beginning October 1, 2009 for all nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The provisions of FAS 157
are effective for our fiscal years beginning October 1, 2008 for financial assets and
financial liabilities. We are currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of FAS 157,
FSP 157-1 and FSP 157-2 on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio. Our
marketable securities are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost.
Marketable securities consist of high-grade commercial paper and corporate bonds. Our credit
policy specifies the types of eligible investments and minimum credit quality of our
investments, as well as diversification and concentration limits which mitigate our risk. Our
portfolio contains no auction rate securities. We intend to hold all marketable securities
currently in our portfolio to maturity and we believe that realization of any unrealized
holding losses is not likely at this time and is therefore not recorded. We do not use
derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate risk as all investments are
held to maturity and the majority of our investments mature in less than a year. A change in
interest rates would not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
We have transactions that are executed in the U.S. Dollar, British Pound, Euro or Japanese
Yen. As a result, we are exposed to foreign currency transaction risk associated with certain
sales transactions being denominated in Euros, British Pounds or Japanese Yen, and foreign
currency translation risk as the financial position and operating results of our foreign
subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a
hedging strategy to reduce foreign currency risk.
27
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK (CONTINUED)
For the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we had approximately $55.4 million and $44.6
million, respectively, of net sales to foreign customers including export sales, of which
$32.3 million and $22.3 million, respectively, were denominated in foreign currency,
predominantly Euros. In future periods, a significant portion of sales will continue to be
made in Euros.
As of June 30, 2008, we had intercompany loans totaling $27.9 million denominated in U.S. Dollars
with Digi International Ltd. for the acquisition of Sarian. As these intercompany loans are not
considered to be a long-term investment and are expected to be repaid by Digi International Ltd.,
we are exposed to foreign currency translation gains and losses.
The average monthly exchange rate for the Euro to the U.S. Dollar increased approximately
14.2% from 1.3160 to 1.5024, the average monthly exchange rate for the British Pound to the
U.S. Dollar increased approximately 2.3% from 1.9517 to 1.9984 and the average monthly
exchange rate for the Japanese Yen to the U.S. Dollar increased approximately 10.9% from
0.0084 to 0.0093 for the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period
one year ago. A 10% change from the first nine months of fiscal 2008 average exchange rate
for the Euro, British Pound and Yen to the U.S. Dollar would have resulted in a 1.6% increase
or decrease in net sales and a 2.3% increase or decrease in stockholders equity. The above
analysis does not take into consideration any pricing adjustments we need to consider in
response to changes in the exchange rate.
CREDIT RISK
We have some exposure to credit risk related to our accounts receivable portfolio. Exposure
to credit risk is controlled through regular monitoring of customer financial status, credit
limits and collaboration with sales management on customer contacts to facilitate payment.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this
evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act was recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including the principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing
similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently
completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We have completed the implementation
of an upgrade to our systems for financial reporting and operations. We do not currently
believe that this implementation will adversely affect our internal control over financial
reporting.
28
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The disclosures set forth in Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part
I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to the risk factors provided in Part I, Item 1A of our 2007
Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on December 6, 2007.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
29
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
2 | (a) | Share Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2008 among Digi International Limited, a
subsidiary of Digi International Inc., and all of the shareholders of Sarian Systems
Limited (excluding schedules and exhibits which the Registrant agrees to furnish
supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request) (1) |
||
3 | (a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (2) |
||
3 | (b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company |
||
4 | (a) | Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, between the Company and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent (3) |
||
4 | (b) | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences
and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares (4) |
||
31 | (a) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
||
31 | (b) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
||
32 | Section 1350 Certification |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 1-34033) | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993 (File No. 0-17972) | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033) | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033) |
30
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. |
||||
Date: August 7, 2008 | By: | /s/ Subramanian Krishnan | ||
Subramanian Krishnan | ||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
31
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Document Description | Form of Filing | ||||
2 | (a) | Share Purchase Agreement dated
April 28, 2008 among Digi International
Limited, a subsidiary of Digi International
Inc., and all of the shareholders of Sarian
Systems Limited (excluding schedules and
exhibits which the Registrant agrees to furnish
supplementally to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request)
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
3 | (a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of the Company, as Amended (incorporated
by reference to the corresponding exhibit
number to the Companys Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 1993
(File No. 0-17972))
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
3 | (b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the
Company
|
Filed Electronically | |||
4 | (a) | Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22,
2008, between the Company and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
4 | (b) | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate
of Powers, Designations, Preferences
and Rights of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Shares
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
31 | (a) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
Filed Electronically | |||
31 | (b) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
Filed Electronically | |||
32 | Section 1350 Certification
|
Filed Electronically |
32