DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 1-34033
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 41-1532464 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
11001 Bren Road East | ||
Minnetonka, Minnesota | 55343 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(952) 912-3444
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
On August 3, 2011, there were 25,539,676 shares of the registrants $.01 par value Common Stock
outstanding.
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
Forward-looking Statements |
17 | |||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
EX-31.A | ||||||||
EX-31.B | ||||||||
EX-32 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per common share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 54,274 | $ | 47,238 | $ | 152,324 | $ | 135,282 | ||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization of purchased
and core technology shown separately below) |
24,877 | 22,496 | 70,909 | 63,913 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of purchased and core technology |
642 | 1,024 | 2,343 | 3,190 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
28,755 | 23,718 | 79,072 | 68,179 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
10,134 | 9,089 | 29,464 | 27,932 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
7,860 | 7,159 | 23,517 | 20,723 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,597 | 4,926 | 13,670 | 13,308 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring |
| | (70 | ) | (352 | ) | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
22,591 | 21,174 | 66,581 | 61,611 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
6,164 | 2,544 | 12,491 | 6,568 | ||||||||||||
Other (expense) income, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
61 | 94 | 187 | 277 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(26 | ) | (26 | ) | (79 | ) | (110 | ) | ||||||||
Other (expense) income |
(378 | ) | (16 | ) | (613 | ) | 247 | |||||||||
Total other (expense) income, net |
(343 | ) | 52 | (505 | ) | 414 | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
5,821 | 2,596 | 11,986 | 6,982 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
2,206 | (1,216 | ) | 3,816 | 285 | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,615 | $ | 3,812 | $ | 8,170 | $ | 6,697 | ||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
25,369 | 24,930 | 25,236 | 24,815 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
25,879 | 25,272 | 25,687 | 25,123 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
June 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 59,942 | $ | 50,943 | ||||
Marketable securities |
38,483 | 36,634 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
27,719 | 24,090 | ||||||
Inventories |
24,906 | 26,550 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
2,891 | 3,344 | ||||||
Other |
2,795 | 2,141 | ||||||
Total current assets |
156,736 | 143,702 | ||||||
Marketable securities, long-term |
6,733 | | ||||||
Property, equipment and improvements, net |
15,799 | 16,396 | ||||||
Identifiable intangible assets, net |
15,630 | 19,851 | ||||||
Goodwill |
86,605 | 86,210 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
3,242 | 320 | ||||||
Other |
523 | 486 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 285,268 | $ | 266,965 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 7,398 | $ | 7,449 | ||||
Income taxes payable |
1,824 | 82 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
7,269 | 5,850 | ||||||
Deferred payment on acquisition |
2,993 | 2,914 | ||||||
Other |
4,865 | 5,302 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
24,349 | 21,597 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
2,363 | 2,838 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
986 | 1,457 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
342 | 517 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
28,040 | 26,409 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 11) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized;
28,947,903 and 28,666,311 shares issued |
289 | 287 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
192,326 | 185,427 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
99,819 | 91,649 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(8,647 | ) | (9,589 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,497,375 and 3,584,215 shares |
(26,559 | ) | (27,218 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
257,228 | 240,556 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 285,268 | $ | 266,965 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,170 | $ | 6,697 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation of property, equipment and improvements |
2,234 | 2,002 | ||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets |
4,874 | 5,743 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
2,562 | 2,603 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(474 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(883 | ) | (2,201 | ) | ||||
Inventory obsolescence |
1,439 | 663 | ||||||
Restructuring |
(70 | ) | (352 | ) | ||||
Other |
170 | 496 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(1,854 | ) | (3,287 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
16,168 | 12,325 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of marketable securities |
(44,517 | ) | (38,538 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |
35,888 | 18,615 | ||||||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
| (3,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
| 11 | ||||||
Purchase of property, equipment, improvements and certain
other intangible assets |
(2,166 | ) | (2,337 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(10,795 | ) | (25,249 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
| (8 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
474 | 39 | ||||||
Proceeds from stock option plan transactions |
1,839 | 1,097 | ||||||
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan transactions |
744 | 691 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
3,057 | 1,819 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
569 | (2,117 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
8,999 | (13,222 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
50,943 | 48,434 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 59,942 | $ | 35,212 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION OF UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation
The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q have
been prepared by Digi International Inc. (the Company, Digi, we, our, or us) pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain
information and footnote disclosures, normally included in consolidated financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (U.S. GAAP), have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to such rules and regulations.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, including (but not limited to) the
summary of significant accounting policies, presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the SEC (2010 Financial Statements).
The condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments which consist only of normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a
fair statement of the condensed consolidated financial position and the condensed consolidated
results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The condensed consolidated results
of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
The year-end condensed balance sheet data were derived from our 2010 Financial Statements, but do
not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.
In connection with preparing the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine
months ended June 30, 2011, we have evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and
disclosure through the date of this filing.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This
guidance eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the
consolidated statement of stockholders equity. Rather it requires that all non-owner changes in
stockholders equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income
or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance also requires us to present on the
face of the financial statements any reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified
from other comprehensive income to net income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance
beginning with our fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will
have no effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations, as it will only
impact how certain information related to other comprehensive income is presented in our
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements
(Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in
U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This guidance changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements
in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements
to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
This guidance is to be applied prospectively and is effective during interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance beginning with our fiscal quarter
ending March 31, 2012. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments and
unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax. Comprehensive
income was (in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,615 | $ | 3,812 | $ | 8,170 | $ | 6,697 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment |
202 | (1,745 | ) | 971 | (4,591 | ) | ||||||||||
Change in net unrealized loss on investments |
(7 | ) | (34 | ) | (48 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||
Less income tax benefit |
3 | 13 | 19 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification of gain included in net income |
| | | (36 | ) | |||||||||||
Less income tax benefit |
| | | 14 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 3,813 | $ | 2,046 | $ | 9,112 | $ | 2,067 | ||||||||
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic net income per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares
outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares of our stock result from
dilutive common stock options and shares purchased through our employee stock purchase plan.
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the net income per
common share calculations (in thousands, except per common share data):
Three months ended June 30, | Nine months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,615 | $ | 3,812 | $ | 8,170 | $ | 6,697 | ||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic net income per common
share weighted average shares outstanding |
25,369 | 24,930 | 25,236 | 24,815 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options and employee
stock purchase plan |
510 | 342 | 451 | 308 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted net income per common
share adjusted weighted average shares |
25,879 | 25,272 | 25,687 | 25,123 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share, basic |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
Net income per common share, diluted |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
Because their effect would be anti-dilutive, certain potentially dilutive shares related
to stock options to purchase common shares were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per common share set forth above as the options exercise prices were greater than
the average market price of our common shares. For the three and nine month periods ended
June 30, 2011, there were 1,921,684 and 1,767,934 potentially dilutive shares related to such
stock options, respectively. For the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2010, there
were 2,482,104 and 2,726,104 potentially dilutive shares related to such stock options,
respectively.
7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA
(in thousands)
June 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 28,016 | $ | 24,639 | ||||
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
(297 | ) | (549 | ) | ||||
$ | 27,719 | $ | 24,090 | |||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 20,374 | $ | 21,678 | ||||
Work in process |
550 | 418 | ||||||
Finished goods |
3,982 | 4,454 | ||||||
$ | 24,906 | $ | 26,550 | |||||
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method.
5. ACQUISITION
Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc.
On July 23, 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), a company that performs
wireless design services. Spectrum is now a wholly owned subsidiary. The acquisition was
structured as a merger with a cash purchase price of $10.0 million. Of this amount, $4.0 million
was paid on the acquisition date, $3.0 million was paid in January 2010, and the remaining $3.0
million was paid in July 2011. The July 2011 deferred payment of $3.0 million was recorded as a
liability on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2011 at its then current net present value.
Implied interest was accrued on this value until the time the final payment was made in July 2011.
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Our marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds and
government municipal bonds.
We analyze our available-for-sale marketable securities for impairment on an ongoing basis. We
consider factors such as the length of time and extent to which the securities have been in an
unrealized loss position and the trend of any unrealized losses. We also consider whether an
unrealized loss is a temporary loss or an other-than-temporary loss such as: (a) whether we have
the intent to sell the security, or (b) whether it is more likely than not that we will be required
to sell the security before its anticipated recovery.
In order to estimate the fair value for each security in our investment portfolio, where available,
we obtain quoted market prices and trading activity for each security. We also review the
financial solvency of each security issuer and obtain other relevant information from our
investment advisor. As of June 30, 2011, 31 of our securities were trading below our amortized
cost basis. We determined each decline in value to be temporary based upon the above described
factors. We expect to realize the fair value of these securities, plus accrued interest, either at
the time of maturity or when the security is sold.
All of our current holdings are classified as available-for-sale marketable securities and are
recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet with the unrealized gains and losses
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
At June 30, 2011 our marketable securities were (in thousands):
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
Cost (1) | Gains | Losses (2) | Fair Value (1) | |||||||||||||
Current marketable securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
$ | 14,137 | $ | 5 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 14,130 | |||||||
Government municipal bonds |
12,617 | 2 | (5 | ) | 12,614 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
4,755 | | (5 | ) | 4,750 | |||||||||||
Commercial paper |
6,995 | | (6 | ) | 6,989 | |||||||||||
Current marketable securities |
38,504 | 7 | (28 | ) | 38,483 | |||||||||||
Non-current marketable securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
6,503 | | (19 | ) | 6,484 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
250 | | (1 | ) | 249 | |||||||||||
Non-current marketable securities |
6,753 | | (20 | ) | 6,733 | |||||||||||
Total marketable securities |
$ | 45,257 | $ | 7 | $ | (48 | ) | $ | 45,216 | |||||||
(1) | Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $555. | |
(2) | The aggregate related fair value of securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2011 was $31,647. |
At September 30, 2010 our marketable securities were (in thousands):
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
Cost (1) | Gains | Losses (2) | Fair Value (1) | |||||||||||||
Current marketable securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
$ | 26,163 | $ | 7 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 26,161 | |||||||
Government municipal bonds |
5,463 | 5 | (2 | ) | 5,466 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
5,001 | 6 | | 5,007 | ||||||||||||
Current marketable securities |
$ | 36,627 | $ | 18 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 36,634 | |||||||
(1) | Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $451. | |
(2) | The aggregate related fair value of securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2010 was $18,909. |
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement
date. This standard also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value. This
standard maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from
independent sources. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based upon the best information
available in the circumstances. The categorization of financial assets and liabilities within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
9
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
The hierarchy is broken down into the following three levels:
| Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
| Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. | ||
| Level 3 Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 may also include certain investment securities for which there is limited market activity or a decrease in the observability of market pricing for the investments, such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. |
Fair value is applied to financial assets such as our marketable securities, which are classified
and accounted for as available-for-sale. These items are stated at fair value at each reporting
period using the above guidance.
The following tables provide information by level for financial assets that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011 using: | ||||||||||||||||
Total carrying | Quoted price in | Significant other | Significant | |||||||||||||
value at | active markets | observable inputs | unobservable inputs | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market |
$ | 39,451 | $ | 39,451 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Available-for-sale marketable securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
20,614 | | 20,614 | | ||||||||||||
Government municipal bonds |
12,614 | | 12,614 | | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
4,999 | | 4,999 | | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
6,989 | | 6,989 | | ||||||||||||
Total cash equivalents and marketable
securities measured at fair value |
$ | 84,667 | $ | 39,451 | $ | 45,216 | $ | | ||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 using: | ||||||||||||||||
Total carrying | Quoted price in | Significant other | Significant | |||||||||||||
value at | active markets | observable inputs | unobservable inputs | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Cash equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market |
$ | 29,416 | $ | 29,416 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Available-for-sale marketable securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
26,161 | | 26,161 | | ||||||||||||
Government municipal bonds |
5,466 | | 5,466 | | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
5,007 | | 5,007 | | ||||||||||||
Total cash equivalents and marketable
securities measured at fair value |
$ | 66,050 | $ | 29,416 | $ | 36,634 | $ | | ||||||||
10
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
Cash equivalents are measured at fair value using quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets. We value our Level 2 assets using inputs that are based on market indices of
similar assets within an active market. There were no transfers in to or out of our Level 2
financial assets during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
We had no financial assets valued with Level 3 inputs as of June 30, 2011 nor did we purchase or
sell any Level 3 financial assets during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
The use of different assumptions, applying different judgment to matters that are inherently
subjective and changes in future market conditions could result in different estimates of fair
value of our securities, currently and in the future. If market conditions deteriorate, we may
incur impairment charges for securities in our investment portfolio.
8. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Amortizable identifiable intangible assets were (in thousands):
June 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
carrying | Accum. | carrying | Accum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
amount | amort. | Net | amount | amort. | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased and core technology |
$ | 46,610 | $ | (41,355 | ) | $ | 5,255 | $ | 46,484 | $ | (38,917 | ) | $ | 7,567 | |||||||||||
License agreements |
2,840 | (2,592 | ) | 248 | 2,840 | (2,537 | ) | 303 | |||||||||||||||||
Patents and trademarks |
10,342 | (7,350 | ) | 2,992 | 9,753 | (6,522 | ) | 3,231 | |||||||||||||||||
Customer maintenance contracts |
700 | (656 | ) | 44 | 700 | (604 | ) | 96 | |||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
17,611 | (10,542 | ) | 7,069 | 17,481 | (9,096 | ) | 8,385 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
1,042 | (1,020 | ) | 22 | 1,039 | (770 | ) | 269 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 79,145 | $ | (63,515 | ) | $ | 15,630 | $ | 78,297 | $ | (58,446 | ) | $ | 19,851 | |||||||||||
Amortization expense was $1.5 million and $1.9 million for the three month periods ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense was $4.9 million and $5.7 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense is recorded on our
consolidated statement of operations within cost of sales, amortization of purchased and core
technology, which is a component of total cost of sales, and in general and administrative expense.
Estimated amortization expense related to identifiable intangible assets for the remainder of
fiscal 2011 and the five succeeding fiscal years is (in thousands):
2011 (three months) |
$ | 1,305 | ||
2012 |
4,626 | |||
2013 |
3,434 | |||
2014 |
2,909 | |||
2015 |
1,909 | |||
2016 |
660 |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were (in thousands):
Nine months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Beginning balance, October 1 |
$ | 86,210 | $ | 86,558 | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
395 | (1,368 | ) | |||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 86,605 | $ | 85,190 | ||||
11
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS (CONTINUED)
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of June 30, or more frequently if events or
circumstances occur which could indicate impairment. As of the close of business on June 30, 2011,
our stock price was $13.00. Based on the common shares outstanding at June 30, 2011 of 25,450,528
our market capitalization was $330.9 million compared to our net asset carrying value of $257.2
million. As the fair value exceeded the carrying value of net assets by a significant percentage,
we determined that we were not at a level of risk of failing the step one test for recognition and
measurement of an impairment loss.
We have defined the criteria that will result in additional interim goodwill impairment testing.
If these criteria are met, we will undertake the analysis to determine whether a goodwill
impairment has occurred, which could have a material effect on our consolidated financial position
and results of operations. The evaluation of asset impairment requires us to make assumptions
about future cash flows and revenues. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual
results may differ from assumed or estimated amounts. If these estimates and assumptions change,
we may be required to recognize impairment losses in the future.
9. INCOME TAXES
Income
taxes have been provided at an overall effective rate of 31.8% and 4.1%
for the nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our effective tax rate will
vary based on a variety of factors, including overall profitability, the geographical mix of income
before taxes and related statutory tax rate in each jurisdiction, and discrete events, such as settlements of
audits.
In the nine month period ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a discrete tax benefit of $0.6 million.
This benefit primarily resulted from the reversal of tax reserves from various jurisdictions,
primarily foreign, related to the expiration of the statutes of limitations as well as from the
enactment of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010.
This law extended the research and development tax credit that allowed us to record tax credits
earned during the last three quarters of fiscal 2010 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. This
benefit reduced our effective tax rate by 4.8 percentage points for the nine month period ended
June 30, 2011 to 31.8%.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we recorded a discrete tax benefit of $2.2 million due to the
reversal of domestic tax reserves associated with the statutory closing of a prior tax year and the
conclusion of an audit of prior tax years. Further, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we
recorded a discrete tax benefit of $0.1 million related to an expiration of statutes of
limitations. These discrete tax benefits reduced our effective tax rate by 32.5 percentage points
for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 to 4.1%.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions is (in thousands):
Uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2010 |
$ | 2,265 | ||
Increases related to: |
||||
Prior year income tax positions |
32 | |||
Decreases related to: |
||||
Expiration of the statutes of limitations |
(466 | ) | ||
Uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2011 |
$ | 1,831 | ||
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our effective
tax rate is $1.7 million.
12
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. During
the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a minimal benefit primarily due to the reversal
of reserves related to the expiration of the statutes of limitations. During the nine months ended
June 30, 2010 we recognized a net benefit of $0.1 million of interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. As of June 30, 2011 and September 30,
2010, we had accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of $0.5 million
and $0.6 million, respectively, included in long-term income taxes payable on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
There are no tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of
unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease significantly over the next 12 months.
We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Accordingly, we
must determine the appropriate allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions. This
determination requires us to make several estimates and assumptions. Tax audits associated with
the allocation of this income may require an extended period of time to resolve and may result in
adjustments to our income tax balances in those years that are material to our consolidated
financial position and results of operations. We are no longer subject to income tax examination
for tax years prior to fiscal 2009 with respect to U.S. federal income tax authorities and fiscal
2007 with respect to foreign income tax authorities. Further, we are no longer subject to income
tax examination for tax years generally before fiscal 2006 with respect to U.S. state taxing
authorities, consisting primarily of Minnesota and California.
10. PRODUCT WARRANTY OBLIGATION
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service. The warranty periods range from one to five years from the date of
receipt. We have the option to either repair or replace products we deem defective with
regard to material or workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that
the related revenue is recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or
replacement cost applied to the estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are
based upon historical warranty incidents and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the
adequacy of the warranty accrual.
The following table summarizes the activity associated with the product warranty accrual (in
thousands):
Three months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Warranties | Settlements | Balance at | |||||||||||||
Fiscal year | April 1 | issued | made | June 30 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
$ | 846 | $ | 288 | $ | (185 | ) | $ | 949 | |||||||
2010 |
$ | 965 | $ | 161 | $ | (217 | ) | $ | 909 |
Nine months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Warranties | Settlements | Balance at | |||||||||||||
Fiscal year | October 1 | issued | made | June 30 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
$ | 877 | $ | 642 | $ | (570 | ) | $ | 949 | |||||||
2010 |
$ | 970 | $ | 586 | $ | (647 | ) | $ | 909 |
13
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. PRODUCT WARRANTY OBLIGATION (CONTINUED)
We are not responsible and do not warrant that custom software versions, created by original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers, based upon our software source code will function in a
particular way, will conform to any specifications or are fit for any particular purpose.
Further, we do not indemnify these customers from any third-party liability as it relates to
or arises from any customization or modifications made by the OEM customer.
11. CONTINGENCIES
Contingent obligations
Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims relating to the initial
public offering (IPO) of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately 300 other public
companies. We acquired NetSilicon on February 13, 2002. The complaint names us as a defendant
along with NetSilicon, certain of its officers and certain underwriters involved in NetSilicons
IPO, among numerous others, and asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO prospectus and
registration statement violated federal securities laws because they contained material
misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters in
allocating shares in NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers. We believe that the claims
against the NetSilicon defendants are without merit and have defended the litigation vigorously.
Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed from the
lawsuit, without prejudice, on October 9, 2002.
As previously disclosed, the parties advised the District Court on February 25, 2009 that they had
reached an agreement-in-principle to settle the litigation in its entirety. A stipulation of
settlement was filed with the District Court on April 2, 2009. On June 9, 2009, the District Court
preliminarily approved the proposed global settlement. Notice was provided to the class, and a
settlement fairness hearing, at which members of the class had an opportunity to object to the
proposed settlement, was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the District Court issued
an order granting final approval to the settlement. Ten appeals initially were filed objecting to
the definition of the settlement class and fairness of the settlement. Five of those appeals were
dismissed with prejudice on October 6, 2010. On May 17, 2011, the Court of Appeals dismissed four
of the remaining appeals and remanded the final appeal to the District Court to determine whether
the appellant has standing to object to the settlement. The District Court has yet to rule on that
issue.
Under the settlement, our insurers are to pay the full amount of settlement share allocated to us,
and we would bear no financial liability beyond our deductible of $250,000 per claim. While there
can be no guarantee as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit, we expect that our
liability insurance will be adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the
applicable deductible per claim. As of June 30, 2011, we have an accrued liability for the
anticipated settlement of $300,000, which we believe is adequate and reflects the amount of loss
that is probable, and a receivable related to the insurance proceeds of $50,000. This $50,000
represents the anticipated settlement of $300,000 less our $250,000 deductible. In the event we
should have losses that exceed the limits of the liability insurance, the losses could have a
material adverse effect on our business and our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
14
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
Patent Infringement Lawsuits
On March 16, 2011, MOSAID Technologies Incorporated filed a patent infringement lawsuit against us
in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas. The lawsuit included allegations against Digi
and 32 other companies pertaining to the infringement of six patents by products compliant with
various Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers standards for implementing wireless local
area network computer communications in certain frequency bands. The lawsuit seeks monetary and
non-monetary relief. We are engaged in settlement discussions, and it is reasonably possible that
we will reach a settlement agreement in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. While we cannot predict
the outcome of this matter, at this time we do not believe it will have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
On January 18, 2011, Advanced Processor Technologies LLC filed a patent infringement lawsuit
against us in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas. The lawsuit included
allegations against Digi and eight other companies pertaining to the infringement of two
patents by products containing data processors with memory management units. The lawsuit
seeks monetary and non-monetary relief. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter or
estimate a range of loss at this time or whether it will have a materially adverse impact on
our business prospects and our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash
flow.
On May 11, 2010, SIPCO, LLC filed a patent infringement lawsuit against us in federal court in the
Eastern District of Texas. This claim subsequently has been moved to the Northern District of
Georgia. The lawsuit included allegations against Digi and five other companies pertaining to the
infringement of SIPCOs patents by wireless mesh networking and multi-port networking products.
The lawsuit seeks monetary and non-monetary relief. We cannot predict the outcome of these matters
or estimate a range of loss at this time or whether it will have a materially adverse impact on our
business prospects and our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
12. RESTRUCTURING
On April 23, 2009, we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless products
and solutions that include hardware, software and services. During the first quarter of fiscal
2011, we reversed $50,000 for legal fees in conjunction with compensation-related items relating to
claims that are no longer probable of assertion. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we
reversed $10,000 related to continued medical benefits and $10,000 for legal fees in conjunction
with compensation-related items relating to claims that are no longer probable of assertion. The
following is a summary of the restructuring charges and other activity within the restructuring
accrual during the first nine months of fiscal 2011 (in thousands):
Employee | ||||||||||||
Termination | ||||||||||||
Costs | Other | Total | ||||||||||
Balance September 30, 2010 |
$ | 13 | $ | 60 | $ | 73 | ||||||
Payments |
(3 | ) | | (3 | ) | |||||||
Reversals |
| (50 | ) | (50 | ) | |||||||
Balance December 31, 2010 |
10 | 10 | 20 | |||||||||
Reversals |
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||
Balance March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
15
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 21, 2011, we announced our intention to restructure our operations in Breisach, Germany.
The restructuring will reduce our manufacturing footprint by consolidating prototype and production
functions and centralizing outsourced production control in our Minneapolis production facility.
The consolidation is driven by our strategy of driving efficiency improvements and enhancing
customer service globally through more centralized operations. As a result of the restructuring,
we expect to reduce the size of our workforce in Breisach by approximately 25 employees. In
connection with the restructuring, we expect to incur approximately $600,000 $700,000 of
restructuring charges on a pre-tax basis. These charges will be incurred in connection with
reductions in the workforce. The significant majority of the expected restructuring charges
associated with this initiative represent cash paid for severance. The charges associated with the
restructuring are expected to be incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and the first
quarter of fiscal 2012. The payments are expected to be completed in the second quarter of fiscal
2012.
16
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The terms we, our or us mean Digi International Inc. and all of the subsidiaries
included in the consolidated financial statements unless the context indicates otherwise. Our
managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as well as our reports on Forms 10-Q
and 8-K and other publicly available information.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements as that term is
defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
The words assume, believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, target, may, will,
expect, plan, project, should, or continue or the negative thereof or other expressions,
which are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical
matters, identify forward-looking statements. Among other items, these statements relate to
expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance,
perceived marketplace opportunities and statements regarding our mission and vision. Such
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, including risks related to the highly competitive market in which our company
operates, rapid changes in technologies that may displace products sold by us, declining prices of
networking products, our reliance on distributors and other third parties to sell our products,
delays in product development efforts, uncertainty in consumer acceptance of our products,
potential liabilities that can arise if any of our products have design or manufacturing defects,
our ability to defend or settle satisfactorily any litigation, uncertainty in global economic
conditions which could negatively affect product demand and the financial solvency of customers and
suppliers, the impact of natural disasters and other events beyond our control that could
negatively impact our supply chain and customers, the ability to achieve the anticipated benefits
and synergies associated with acquisitions, and changes in our level of revenue or profitability
which can fluctuate for many reasons beyond our control. These and other risks, uncertainties and
assumptions identified from time to time in our filings with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, including without limitation, our annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2010, our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
and other filings, could cause the companys future results to differ materially from those
expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Many of such factors are
beyond our ability to control or predict. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date for which they are made. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A description of our critical accounting policies was provided in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010.
17
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OVERVIEW
Our products and services enable our customers to connect, monitor, and control local or remote
electronic devices over a network, via the Internet or by satellite. We operate in the
communications technology industry, which is characterized by rapid technological advances and
evolving industry standards. The marketplace in this industry can be affected significantly by new
product introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers
on the basis of existing and planned product features, service capabilities, company reputation,
brand recognition, technical support, relationships with partners, quality and reliability, product
development capabilities, price and availability.
Net sales increased from $47.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to $54.3 million in the
third quarter of fiscal 2011, an increase of $7.1 million, or 14.9%. Our net sales increased in
the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010 which was
attributable to increased sales within product lines that yielded higher average selling prices,
customer mix and also due to increased overall volume. A key driver of our net sales increase was
our wireless products net sales, which grew from $18.9 million, or 40.0% of net sales, in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 to $22.5 million, or 41.5% of net sales, in the third quarter of fiscal
2011. Our wireless sales increased in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to the same
period in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to the deployment by a number of our larger
customers of our wireless machine to machine (M2M) solutions across our key vertical markets.
Total operating expenses increased $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to the same period a year ago. This primarily was due to our full reinstatement of our
incentive compensation program in fiscal 2011, which was partially reinstated in fiscal 2010. We
also have increased investment in our iDigi® platform. Operating expenses in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 included $1.0 million of expenses related to the internal investigation described in
our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are non-recurring in fiscal 2011.
Net income decreased from $3.8 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, in the third quarter of fiscal
2010 to $3.6 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, a decrease
of $0.2 million, or $0.01 per diluted share. Net income in the third quarter of fiscal 2010
benefited by $2.2 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, from the reversal of tax reserves associated
with the conclusion of an audit of prior tax years and the statutory closing of a prior tax year.
Net income in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 decreased by $0.7 million, net of taxes, or $0.03
per diluted share, as a result of expenses incurred in connection with the internal investigation
noted above. The reversal of tax reserves offset by the internal investigation expenses benefited
net income by $1.5 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, for the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
We anticipate that future growth will result from products and services that are developed
internally as well as from products and services that are acquired. Our key vertical markets are
Smart Grid, fleet management, tank monitoring and medical device connectivity.
18
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected information derived from our interim condensed consolidated
statements of operations (dollars in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, | % increase | Nine months ended June 30, | % increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | 2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 54,274 | 100.0 | % | $ | 47,238 | 100.0 | % | 14.9 | % | $ | 152,324 | 100.0 | % | $ | 135,282 | 100.0 | % | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of
amortization of purchased and core technology
shown separately below) |
24,877 | 45.8 | 22,496 | 47.6 | 10.6 | 70,909 | 46.6 | 63,913 | 47.2 | 10.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of purchased and
core technology |
642 | 1.2 | 1,024 | 2.2 | (37.3 | ) | 2,343 | 1.5 | 3,190 | 2.4 | (26.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
28,755 | 53.0 | 23,718 | 50.2 | 21.2 | 79,072 | 51.9 | 68,179 | 50.4 | 16.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
22,591 | 41.6 | 21,174 | 44.8 | 6.7 | 66,581 | 43.7 | 61,611 | 45.5 | 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
6,164 | 11.4 | 2,544 | 5.4 | 142.3 | 12,491 | 8.2 | 6,568 | 4.9 | 90.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (expense) income, net |
(343 | ) | (0.6 | ) | 52 | 0.1 | (759.6 | ) | (505 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 414 | 0.3 | (222.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
5,821 | 10.8 | 2,596 | 5.5 | 124.2 | 11,986 | 7.9 | 6,982 | 5.2 | 71.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
2,206 | 4.1 | (1,216 | ) | (2.6 | ) | (281.4 | ) | 3,816 | 2.5 | 285 | 0.2 | 1238.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,615 | 6.7 | % | $ | 3,812 | 8.1 | % | (5.2 | )% | $ | 8,170 | 5.4 | % | $ | 6,697 | 5.0 | % | 22.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES
The following summarizes our net sales by product categories for the periods indicated:
Three months ended June 30, | % increase | Nine months ended June 30, | % increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | 2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-embedded |
$ | 28,383 | 52.3 | % | $ | 24,948 | 52.8 | % | 13.8 | % | $ | 82,953 | 54.5 | % | $ | 74,755 | 55.3 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Embedded |
25,891 | 47.7 | 22,290 | 47.2 | 16.2 | 69,371 | 45.5 | 60,527 | 44.7 | 14.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 54,274 | 100.0 | % | $ | 47,238 | 100.0 | % | 14.9 | % | $ | 152,324 | 100.0 | % | $ | 135,282 | 100.0 | % | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-embedded products
Our non-embedded net sales increased by $3.4 million, or 13.8%, for the three months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by an
increase of $2.3 million in net sales of serial servers and $2.1 million in net sales of cellular
products, which partially was offset by a decrease of $0.6 million in net sales of wireless
communication adaptors and $0.2 million in net sales of serial cards. For the nine months ended
June 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010, our non-embedded net sales increased
by $8.2 million, or 11.0%. The increase was primarily driven by an increase of $7.1 million in net
sales of cellular products and $2.3 million in net sales of serial servers, which partially was
offset by a decrease of $0.8 million in net sales of serial cards and $0.5 million in net sales of
USB products. Sales of serial cards have been historically declining and we expect that trend to
continue.
19
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
Embedded products
Our embedded net sales increased by $3.6 million, or 16.2%, for the three months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Embedded net sales increased by $8.8
million, or 14.6%, for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended June
30, 2010. Most product lines including modules, chips and engineering design services increased in
both the three and nine months periods ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods a year ago.
The following summarizes our total net sales by geographic region for all products:
Three months ended June 30, | $ increase | % increase | Nine months ended June 30, | $ increase | % increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | (decrease) | 2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 32,237 | $ | 28,477 | $ | 3,760 | 13.2 | % | $ | 89,717 | $ | 80,517 | $ | 9,200 | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
EMEA |
13,021 | 11,640 | 1,381 | 11.9 | 37,723 | 35,008 | 2,715 | 7.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia countries |
6,897 | 5,905 | 992 | 16.8 | 19,780 | 16,478 | 3,302 | 20.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latin America |
2,119 | 1,216 | 903 | 74.3 | 5,104 | 3,279 | 1,825 | 55.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 54,274 | $ | 47,238 | $ | 7,036 | 14.9 | % | $ | 152,324 | $ | 135,282 | $ | 17,042 | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The fluctuation of foreign currency rates had a favorable impact on net sales of $0.7 million
and $0.4 million for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, when
compared to the same periods a year ago.
GROSS MARGIN
Gross margins were 53.0% and 51.9% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
This compares to gross margins of 50.2% and 50.4% for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010, respectively. The increase in the gross margin for both the three and nine months ended June
30, 2011 as compared to the same periods a year ago primarily was due to favorable changes in
product mix, product cost reduction and a reduction of purchased and core technology amortization
as certain purchased and core technologies are now fully amortized.
OPERATING EXPENSES
The following summarizes our total operating expenses, in dollars and as a percentage of net sales:
Three months ended June 30, | $ increase | Nine months ended June 30, | $ increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | 2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 10,134 | 18.7 | % | $ | 9,089 | 19.2 | % | $ | 1,045 | $ | 29,464 | 19.3 | % | $ | 27,932 | 20.7 | % | $ | 1,532 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
7,860 | 14.5 | 7,159 | 15.2 | 701 | 23,517 | 15.4 | 20,723 | 15.3 | 2,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,597 | 8.4 | 4,926 | 10.4 | (329 | ) | 13,670 | 9.0 | 13,308 | 9.8 | 362 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring |
| 0.0 | | 0.0 | | (70 | ) | 0.0 | (352 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 282 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 22,591 | 41.6 | % | $ | 21,174 | 44.8 | % | $ | 1,417 | $ | 66,581 | 43.7 | % | $ | 61,611 | 45.5 | % | $ | 4,970 | ||||||||||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OPERATING EXPENSES (CONTINUED)
Sales and marketing expenses increased $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011
as compared to June 30, 2010 due to an increase of $0.8 million in compensation-related
expenses and an increase of $0.2 million in other sales and marketing expenses. For the nine
months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to June 30, 2010, the net increase of $1.5 million in
sales and marketing expenses was due to an increase of $1.1 million in compensation-related
expenses and an increase of $0.4 million in other sales and marketing expenses.
Compensation-related expenses increased in both the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011
as compared to the same periods a year ago due to the full reinstatement of our incentive
compensation program in fiscal 2011 and an increase in headcount.
Research and development expenses increased $0.7 million and $2.8 million for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to the same periods a year ago.
This was due to an increase of $0.7 million and $1.7 million for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2011, respectively, in compensation-related expenses mostly as a result of a
fully restored incentive compensation program and an increase in headcount. Also contributing
to the increase for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period a year
ago was $0.7 million for development expenses focused on the iDigi® platform, as well as other
product certification and custom development costs, and $0.4 million of other research and
development expenses.
General and administrative expenses decreased $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to a net decrease of $0.9 million in
legal and professional fees primarily for increased spending in fiscal 2010 related to the
internal investigation described in our Form 10-K for fiscal 2010, partially offset by an
increase of $0.5 million in compensation-related expenses due to a fully restored incentive
compensation program and a $0.1 million increase in other general and administrative expenses.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the
net increase in general and administrative expenses of $0.4 million was due to an increase of
$0.6 million of compensation-related expenses from the full restoration of our incentive
compensation program. This was offset partially by a net decrease in legal and professional
fees of $0.2 million. This decrease was attributable to spending in fiscal 2010 related to
the internal investigation described above that was offset partially by an increase in legal
fees in fiscal 2011 related to patent litigation.
During the first half of fiscal 2011 we completed our obligation pertaining to the restructuring
accrual announced in April 2009 (see Note 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
We expect that total operating expenses will be approximately 43% to 44% of net sales for the
full fiscal year 2011.
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME, NET
Other (expense) income, net decreased by $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The decrease primarily related to the weakening of the
U.S. dollar against the Euro. Foreign currency net losses resulting largely from U.S. dollar net
assets held by our foreign subsidiaries were $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. This compares to an immaterial foreign currency net loss
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and a foreign currency net gain of $0.2 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2010. Net interest income declined slightly for both the three month
and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in the prior year.
21
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
INCOME TAXES
In the nine month period ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a discrete tax benefit of $0.6 million.
This benefit primarily resulted from the reversal of tax reserves from various jurisdictions,
primarily foreign, related to the expiration of the statutes of limitations as well as from the
enactment of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010.
This law extended the research and development tax credit that allowed us to record tax credits
earned during the last three quarters of fiscal 2010 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. This
benefit reduced our effective tax rate by 4.8 percentage points for the nine month period ended
June 30, 2011 to 31.8%.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we recorded a discrete tax benefit of $2.2 million due to the
reversal of domestic tax reserves associated with the statutory closing of a prior tax year and the
conclusion of an audit of prior tax years. Further, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we
recorded a discrete tax benefit of $0.1 million related to an expiration of statutes of
limitations. These discrete tax benefits reduced our effective tax rate by 32.5 percentage points
for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 to 4.1%.
We expect our annualized 2011 effective
tax rate, including the impact of the above discrete tax items, to be
approximately 32% to 34%.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed our operations principally with funds generated from operations. At June 30,
2011, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $98.4 million compared
to $87.6 million at September 30, 2010. Our working capital (total current assets less total
current liabilities) increased $10.3 million to $132.4 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $122.1
million at September 30, 2010. We anticipate total fiscal 2011 capital expenditures will be
approximately $3.2 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $16.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011
as compared to $12.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a net increase of $3.9
million. This increase primarily was due to an increase in net earnings of $1.5 million, changes
in deferred tax benefits of $1.3 million and a working capital net increase of $1.4 million. The
net increase of $1.4 million in working capital was due primarily to smaller increases in accounts
receivable in the nine months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010,
increased inventories in the prior year and an increase in taxes payable. This was partially
offset by increased accounts payable in the prior year related to inventory purchases and an
increase in prepaids and other assets.
Net cash used in investing activities was $10.8 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2011
as compared to net cash used in investing activities of $25.2 million during the nine months ended
June 30, 2010. There were $11.3 million fewer net purchases of marketable securities in the nine
months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Also during the nine
months ended June 30, 2010, we used $3.0 million of cash to pay the former shareholders of Spectrum
for a deferred cash payout related to our acquisition of that company.
Subsequent to June 30, 2011, we made the final deferred payment of $3.0 million related to the
acquisition of Spectrum in July 2011.
22
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
Cash provided by financing activities was $3.1 million and $1.8 million during the nine months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, a net increase of $1.3 million. We received $0.9
million more in proceeds from employee stock option and employee stock purchase plan transactions
during the first nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the same period a year ago. Excess tax
benefits from stock-based compensation also provided $0.4 million more cash in the first nine
months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the same period a year ago.
We expect positive cash flows from operations and believe that our current cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities balances, cash generated from operations and our ability to secure debt
and/or equity financing will be sufficient to fund our business operations for the next twelve
months and beyond.
The contractual obligations disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2010 had no material changes through June 30, 2011.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This
guidance eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the
consolidated statement of stockholders equity. Rather it requires that all non-owner changes in
stockholders equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income
or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance also requires us to present on the
face of the financial statements any reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified
from other comprehensive income to net income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance
beginning with our fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will
have no effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations, as it will only
impact how certain information related to other comprehensive income is presented in our
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements
(Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in
U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This guidance changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements
in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements
to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
This guidance is to be applied prospectively and is effective during interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance beginning with our fiscal quarter
ending March 31, 2012. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
23
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
INTEREST RATE RISK
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio. Our marketable
securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Marketable
securities consist of certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds and government
municipal bonds. Our investment policy specifies the types of eligible investments and minimum
credit quality of our investments, as well as diversification and concentration limits which
mitigate our risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate
risk because the majority of our investments mature in less than a year.
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
We have transactions that are executed in the U.S. Dollar, British Pound, Euro, Japanese Yen and
Indian Rupee. As a result, we are exposed to foreign currency transaction risk associated with
certain sales transactions being denominated in Euros, British Pounds, Japanese Yen or Indian
Rupees, and foreign currency translation risk as the financial position and operating results of
our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars for consolidation. We have not
implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce foreign currency risk.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we had approximately $62.6 million and $54.8
million, respectively, of net sales to foreign customers including export sales. Of these sales,
$21.4 million and $16.9 million, respectively, were denominated in foreign currency, predominantly
Euros and British Pounds. In future periods, we expect a significant portion of sales will
continue to be made in both Euros and British Pounds.
The table below compares the average monthly exchange rates of the Euro, British Pound, Japanese
Yen and Indian Rupee to the U.S. Dollar:
Nine months ended June 30, | % increase | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | ||||||||||
Euro |
1.3884 | 1.3803 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||
British Pound |
1.6047 | 1.5632 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
Japanese Yen |
0.0122 | 0.0110 | 10.6 | % | ||||||||
Indian Rupee |
0.0221 | 0.0217 | 1.9 | % |
A 10% change from the first nine months of fiscal year 2011 average exchange rate for the
Euro, British Pound, Japanese Yen and Indian Rupee to the U.S. Dollar would have resulted in a 1.4%
increase or decrease in net sales and a 2.0% increase or decrease in stockholders equity due to
foreign currency translation. The above analysis does not take into consideration any pricing
adjustments we might consider in response to changes in such exchange rates.
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (CONTINUED) |
CREDIT RISK
We have some exposure to credit risk related to our accounts receivable portfolio. Exposure to
credit risk is controlled through regular monitoring of customer financial status, credit limits
and collaboration with sales management on customer contacts to facilitate payment.
Investments are made in accordance with our investment policy and consist of certificates of
deposit, commercial paper, government municipal bonds and corporate bonds. We may have some credit
exposure related to the fair value of our securities, which could change based on changes in market
conditions. If market conditions deteriorate or if these securities experience credit rating
downgrades, we may incur impairment charges for securities in our investment portfolio. We also
may have credit exposure should there be market disruption because the U.S. Federal Government
has incurred a credit downgrade.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, the
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently
completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
25
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The disclosures set forth in Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in
Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of Part I
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as well as our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None
ITEM 4. | RESERVED |
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None
26
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
3 | (a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (1) |
||
3 | (b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (2) |
||
4 | (a) | Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, between the Company and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent (3) |
||
4 | (b) | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and
Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares (4) |
||
31 | (a) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
||
31 | (b) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
||
32 | Section 1350 Certification |
|||
101 | The following financial information from Digis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on August 9, 2011, formatted
in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 and
September 30, 2010, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
the nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements (tagged as blocks of text). |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993 (File No. 0-17972) | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2011 (File No. 1-34033) | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033) | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033) |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. |
||||
Date: August 9, 2011 | By: | /s/ Steven E. Snyder | ||
Steven E. Snyder | ||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
28
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Document Description | Form of Filing | ||||
3 | (a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as Amended
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
3 | (b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
4 | (a) | Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, between the
Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
4 | (b) | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers,
Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Shares
|
Incorporated by Reference | |||
31 | (a) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
Filed Electronically | |||
31 | (b) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
Filed Electronically | |||
32 | Section 1350 Certification
|
Filed Electronically | ||||
101 | The following financial information from Digis Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed with the
SEC on August 9, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business
Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and nine month periods
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, (iii)
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine
month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and (iv) Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (tagged as blocks of text).
|
Filed Electronically |
29