-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
Digimarc CORP
-
»
Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Digimarc CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
|
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 |
OR |
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number: 001-34108
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
26-2828185
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9405 SW Gemini Drive, Beaverton, Oregon 97008
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
(503) 469-4800
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company ý |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No ý
As of October 26, 2009, there were 7,256,200 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements: |
|
3 |
|
|
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (Unaudited) |
|
3 |
|
|
Statements of Operations for the three-months ended September 30, 2009, for the
Period August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008 and for the Period July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 (Unaudited) |
|
4 |
|
|
Statements of Operations for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, for the Period August 2,
2008 through September 30, 2008 and for the Period January 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 (Unaudited) |
|
5 |
|
|
Statements of Stockholders' Equity as of September 30, 2009 and for the period August 2,
2008 through December 31, 2008 (Unaudited) |
|
6 |
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, for the Period August 2,
2008 through September 30, 2008 and for the Period January 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 (Unaudited) |
|
7 |
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
8 |
Item 2. |
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
30 |
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
54 |
Item 4T. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
54 |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
55 |
Item 1A. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
55 |
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
56 |
Item 6. |
|
Exhibits |
|
57 |
SIGNATURES |
|
58 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008(1) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,685 |
|
$ |
18,928 |
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
30,760 |
|
|
21,240 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
45,473 |
|
|
44,882 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
5,744 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,212 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
456 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
544 |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
50,372 |
|
$ |
52,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
767 |
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
246 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
Accrued merger related liabilities |
|
|
144 |
|
|
386 |
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,873 |
|
|
3,783 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
134 |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
4,040 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (10,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
Common stock (7,256,200 and 7,279,442 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
49,406 |
|
|
48,268 |
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
(2,098 |
) |
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity |
|
|
47,365 |
|
|
48,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
|
$ |
50,372 |
|
$ |
52,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (1)
- Derived
from the Company's December 31, 2008 audited financial statements
See
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
2,827 |
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
4,769 |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
42 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
|
552 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
753 |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
262 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
Transitional services |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(687 |
) |
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per sharebasic |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per sharediluted |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
7,134 |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
7,134 |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per sharebasic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Net loss per sharediluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
See
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
7,882 |
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
13,522 |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
|
11,950 |
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
158 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
|
3,664 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
8,968 |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
8,286 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
3,679 |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
756 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
Transitional services |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
11,258 |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
|
7,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(2,290 |
) |
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
836 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
128 |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(2,162 |
) |
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,174 |
) |
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per sharebasic |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per sharediluted |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per sharebasic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Net income per sharediluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
See
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in
capital |
|
Net Parent
Investment |
|
Total
stockholders'
equity |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
PREDECESSOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT AUGUST 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
47,793 |
|
$ |
47,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUCCESSOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2, 2008: Stock issued through spin-off of Digimarc |
|
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
7,143,442 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
47,736 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(47,793 |
) |
$ |
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
7,279,442 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
48,268 |
|
$ |
76 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
48,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
Issuance of restricted common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
7,256,200 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
49,406 |
|
$ |
(2,098 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
47,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,174 |
) |
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
425 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
Net loss from joint ventures |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
Other non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
812 |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
4,182 |
|
|
|
|
(4,370 |
) |
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
204 |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
|
Accrued merger related liabilities |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
(8,860 |
) |
|
|
|
10,766 |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
343 |
|
|
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
(5,080 |
) |
|
|
|
12,210 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
(799 |
) |
|
Capitalized patent costs |
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale or maturity of marketable securities |
|
|
20,738 |
|
|
69,674 |
|
|
|
|
136,767 |
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
(26,601 |
) |
|
(70,745 |
) |
|
|
|
(137,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(7,438 |
) |
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from Parent stock activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,862 |
|
|
Net activity with Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,237 |
) |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(8,243 |
) |
|
(6,362 |
) |
|
|
|
21,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
18,928 |
|
|
50,900 |
|
|
|
|
29,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
10,685 |
|
$ |
44,538 |
|
|
|
$ |
50,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
Digimarc Corporation ("Digimarc" or the "Company") enables governments and enterprises around the world to give digital identities to
media and objects that computers can sense and recognize and to which they can react. The Company's technology provides the means to infuse persistent digital information, perceptible only to
computers and digital devices, into all forms of media content. The unique digital identifier placed in media generally persists with it regardless of the distribution path and whether it is copied,
manipulated or converted to a different format, and does not affect the quality of the content or the enjoyment or other traditional uses of it. The Company's technology permits computers and digital
devices to quickly identify relevant data from vast amounts of media content.
Acquisition of Old Digimarc and Separation of DMRC Corporation
On June 29, 2008, the former Digimarc Corporation ("Old Digimarc") entered into an amended and restated merger agreement, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of July 17, 2008, which we refer to as the Old Digimarc/L-1 merger agreement, with L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
("L-1") and Dolomite Acquisition Co. ("Dolomite"), a wholly owned subsidiary of L-1, pursuant to which Dolomite, in a transaction which we refer to as the offer,
purchased more than 90% of the outstanding shares of Old Digimarc common stock, together with the associated preferred stock purchase rights, for $12.25 per share. On August 13, 2008, following
the completion of the offer, Dolomite merged with and into Old Digimarc with Old Digimarc continuing as the surviving company and a wholly owned subsidiary of L-1.
On
August 1, 2008, prior to the initial expiration of the offer, Old Digimarc contributed all of the assets and liabilities related to its digital watermarking business, which we
refer to as the Digital Watermarking Business, together with all of Old Digimarc's cash, to DMRC LLC. Following the restructuring, all of the limited liability company interests of
DMRC LLC were transferred to a newly created trust for the benefit of Old Digimarc record holders. DMRC LLC then merged with and into DMRC Corporation, and each limited liability company
interest of DMRC LLC was converted into one share of common stock of DMRC Corporation. After completion of the Old
Digimarc/L-1 merger, DMRC Corporation changed its name to Digimarc Corporation. The shares of Digimarc common stock were held by the trust until the Form 10, General Form for Registration of Securities, was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on October 16, 2008, at
which time the shares were distributed to Old Digimarc record holders, as beneficiaries of the trust, pro rata in accordance with their ownership of shares of Old Digimarc common stock on
August 1, 2008 at 5:30 pm Eastern time, the spin-off record date and time. Each Old Digimarc record holder was entitled to receive one share of Digimarc common stock for
every three and one half shares of Old Digimarc common stock held by the stockholder as of the spin-off record date and time.
Joint Venture and Patent License Agreements with The Nielsen Company
On June 11, 2009 the Company entered into two joint venture agreements with The Nielsen Company ("Nielsen") to launch two new
companies. The two joint venture agreements and a revised patent license agreement expand and replace the previous license and services agreement between the
8
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Company
and Nielsen that has been in operation since late 2007. Under the new agreements, the Company and Nielsen plan to work together to develop new products and services, including the expansion
and deployment of those products and services that were in development under the prior agreement.
Under
the terms of the patent license agreement, Nielsen agreed to pay Digimarc $18,750 during the period from July 2009 through January 2014, and Digimarc granted to Nielsen a
non-exclusive license to Digimarc's patents for use within Nielsen's business. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the agreement, the license will continue until the expiration of
the last to expire of the licensed patents.
Joint
venture I, TVaura LLC, will engage in the development of copyright filtering solutions, royalty/audit solutions for online video and audio rights organizations, guilds or
other organizations involved in the reconciliation of royalties, residuals and other payments, and other related products. Each of the Company and Nielsen will make initial cash contributions
aggregating $3,900 payable quarterly from July 2009 through October 2011. The Company will provide technical and development services to TVaura LLC's business for the following periods for the
following minimum service fees, subject to adjustment for any development service fees paid to the Company by TVaura Mobile LLC: $1,130 for the remainder of 2009; $2,800 in 2010; and $2,740 in
2011.
Joint
venture II, TVaura Mobile LLC, will engage in the development of certain enhanced television offerings, and other related products. Each of the Company and Nielsen will make
initial cash contributions aggregating $2,800 payable quarterly from July 2009 through October 2011.
Pursuant
to the terms of the agreements and Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810 "Consolidation" (formerly Emerging Issues Task
Force ("EITF") Issue No. 96-16, "Investor's Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholders
Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights"), the joint ventures will not be consolidated with the Company and will be separately disclosed in the financial statements and notes to
financial statements.
Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared from the Company's records without audit and, in management's opinion, include
all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly reflect the financial condition and the results of operations for the periods presented. Certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (the "U.S.") have been condensed or omitted in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC.
These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, which was filed with the SEC on February 27, 2009. The results of operations for the interim periods presented in these financial statements are not necessarily
indicative of the results for the full year.
9
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Basis of Accounting: Predecessor Financial Statements
The predecessor financial statements include certain accounts of Old Digimarc and the assets, liabilities and results of operations of
Old Digimarc's Digital Watermarking Business that were separated, or "carved-out" from Old Digimarc. The operating
expenses included in the predecessor financial statements include proportional allocations of various shared services common costs of Old Digimarc because specific identification of the expenses was
not practicable. The common costs include expenses from Old Digimarc related to various operating shared services cost centers, including executive, finance and accounting, human resources, legal,
marketing, intellectual property, facilities and information technology.
Management
believes that the assumptions underlying the predecessor financial statements are reasonable. The cost allocation methods applied to certain shared services common cost
centers include the following:
10
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
11
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
-
- Commitments and contingencies: Commitments and
contingencies related to the predecessor operations are included in these financial statements, and those relating to Old Digimarc were excluded.
-
- Stock compensation expense: Stock-based compensation is
accounted for by Old Digimarc in accordance with ASC 718 "CompensationStock Compensation" (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004)), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation for all stock-
based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, employee stock purchases under a stock purchase plan and restricted stock awards based on estimated fair values. Stock
compensation expense was allocated to Digimarc based on a combination of specific and shared services resource allocations from Old Digimarc.
The financial information in the predecessor financial statements does not include all of the expenses that would have been incurred had the predecessor been a
separate, stand-alone public entity. As such, the predecessor financial information does not reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Digimarc's current business, had
the predecessor operated as a separate, stand-alone public entity during the periods presented in the predecessor financial statements. Additionally, the predecessor financial statements include
proportional allocations of various shared services common costs of Old Digimarc because specific identification of these expenses was not practicable. It is expected that the initial operating costs
of Digimarc on a stand-alone basis will be higher than those allocated to the predecessor operations under the shared services methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
Consequently, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows reflected in the predecessor financial statements may not be indicative of those that would have been achieved had the
predecessor operated as a separate, stand-alone entity for the periods reflected in the predecessor financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires Digimarc to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Certain of the Company's
accounting policies require higher degrees of judgment than others in their application. These include revenue recognition on long-term service contracts, impairments and estimation of
useful lives of long-lived assets, reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable, contingencies and litigation and stock-based compensation. Digimarc bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
12
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Marketable Securities
The Company considers all investments with original maturities over 90 days that mature in less than one year to be
short-term marketable securities. Both short- and long-term marketable securities include federal agency notes, company notes, and commercial paper. The Company's marketable
securities are generally classified as held-to-maturity as of the balance sheet date and are reported at amortized cost, which approximates market. The book value of these
investments approximates fair market value and, accordingly, no amounts have been recorded to other comprehensive income.
A
decline in the market value of any security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount of fair value. The
impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers
whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and considers whether evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence
to the contrary. There have been no other-than-temporary impairments identified or recorded by the Company.
Premiums
and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using a method that approximates the effective interest method. Under
this method, dividend and interest income are recognized when earned.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 820 "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" (formerly SFAS 157,
"Fair Value Measurements") defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and
enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last
unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following:
-
- Level 1Pricing inputs are quoted prices available in active markets for identical investments as of
the reporting date.
-
- Level 2Pricing inputs are quoted for similar investments, or inputs that are observable, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 includes investments valued at quoted prices adjusted for legal or contractual
restrictions specific to these investments.
-
- Level 3Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment, that is, inputs that reflect the reporting
entity's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Level 3 includes private portfolio investments that are supported by little or no
market activity.
ASC
825 "Financial Instruments" (formerly SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities") allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for specified financial assets and liabilities on
a contract-by-contract basis. The Company did not elect the fair value option under this statement as to specific assets or liabilities.
13
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Therefore,
through September 30, 2009, the Company has not recognized the net change in fair value of its financial assets and liabilities.
The
estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, short- and long-term marketable securities, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued payroll approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amounts of capital leases approximate fair value
because the stated interest rates approximate current market rates. These items are valued using either Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.
The
Company records marketable securities at amortized cost of $32,847, which approximates fair value. The fair value of the marketable securities at September 30, 2009, excluding
accrued interest, was $32,782. The fair value is based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets, a Level 1 input.
The
Company records money market funds at cost and continues to carry those amounts at cost which equals fair value. The fair value is based on quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets, a Level 1 input. As of September 30, 2009, the cost and fair value of the Company's money market funds were each equal to $10,685.
Concentrations of Business and Credit Risk
A significant portion of the Company's business depends on a limited number of large contracts. The loss of any large contract may
result in loss of revenue and margin on a prospective basis.
Financial
instruments that potentially subject Digimarc to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, and trade and unbilled accounts
receivable. Digimarc places its cash and cash equivalents with major banks and financial institutions and at times deposits may
exceed insured limits. Other than cash used for operating needs, which may include short-term investments with its principal banks, its investment policy limits its credit exposure to any
one financial institution or type of financial instrument by limiting the maximum of 5% or $1,000, whichever is greater, to be invested in any one issuer except for the U.S. Government and U. S.
federal agencies, which have no limits, at the time of purchase. As a result, the credit risk associated with cash and investments is believed to be minimal.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360 "Property,
Plant and Equipment" (formerly SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets).
This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell.
14
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Software Development Costs
Under ASC 985 "Software" (formerly SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software to Be Sold,
Leased, or Otherwise Marketed), software development costs are to be capitalized beginning when
a product's technological feasibility has been established and ending when a product is made available for general release to customers. To date, the establishment of technological feasibility of the
Company's products has occurred shortly before general release and, therefore, software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been immaterial. Accordingly, the Company has not
capitalized any software development costs and has charged all such costs to research and development expense.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred as defined in 730 "Research and
Development" (formerly SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs). Digimarc accounts for amounts received
under its funded research and development arrangements in accordance with the provisions of ASC 730 (also formerly SFAS No. 68, Research and Development
Arrangements). Under the terms of the arrangements, Digimarc is not obligated to repay any of the amounts provided by the funding parties. As a result, Digimarc recognizes
revenue as the services are performed.
Patent Costs
Costs associated with the application and award of patents in the U.S. and various other countries are capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the patents as determined at award date, which varies depending on the pendency period of the application, generally approximating seventeen years.
Capitalized patent costs include internal legal
labor, professional legal fees, government filing fees and translation fees related to obtaining the Company's patent portfolio. Such costs were expensed in the predecessor financial statements.
Costs
associated with the maintenance and annuity fees of patents are accounted for as prepaid assets at the time of payment and amortized over the respective periods, generally from one
to four years. These costs were expensed in the predecessor financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
The Company's revenue consists of subscription revenue, which includes hardware and software sales, royalties and revenues from the
licensing of digital watermarking products and related authentication services. The Company's revenue recognition policy follows ASC 605 "Revenue
Recognition," ASC 985 (formerly Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as
amended by SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP No. 97-2, Software Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions,
and SOP 81-1 Accounting for the Performance of Construction Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, and EITF Issue
No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables), and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 104 Revenue Recognition.
15
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation
ASC 718 requires the measurement and recognition of compensation for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors including
stock options and restricted stock based on estimated fair values.
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as its method of valuation for stock-based awards. The Company's determination of the fair value of stock-based awards on the date
of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited
to, the expected life of the award, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the award and actual and
projected exercise behaviors. Although the fair value of stock-based awards is determined in accordance with ASC 718 and SAB No. 107 Shared-Based
Payment, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, and other reasonable assumptions could provide differing results.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes
reflect the future tax consequences of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce tax assets to
the amount expected to be realized.
2. Recent Accounting Standards Update
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2009-14, Software: Certain
Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elementsa consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, which will significantly improve the reporting of certain
transactions to more closely reflect the underlying economics of the transactions. By excluding from its scope certain software-enabled devices, multiple-element arrangements that include such
software-enabled devices will now be evaluated for separation and allocation using the guidance in ASU No. 2009-13 (described below). ASU No. 2009-14 is effective
for revenue arrangements entered or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of this standard, but does
not expect the adoption of the standard will have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition: Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangementsa consensus of the
FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, which eliminates the use of the residual method for allocating consideration, as well as the criteria that requires objective and reliable
evidence of fair value of undelivered elements in order to separate the elements in a
16
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
2. Recent Accounting Standards Update (Continued)
multiple-element
arrangement. By removing the criterion requiring the use of objective and reliable evidence of fair value in separately accounting for deliverables, the recognition of revenue will
more closely align with certain revenue arrangements. The standard also will replace the term "fair value" in the revenue allocation guidance with "selling price" to clarify that the allocation of
revenue is based on entity-specific assumptions rather than assumptions of a marketplace participant. ASU No. 2009-13 is effective for revenue arrangements entered or materially
modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of this standard, but does not expect the adoption of the standard will
have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-01, Amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 168The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, to codify in ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, FASB Statement 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, which was issued to establish the Codification as the sole source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB, excluding SEC guidance, to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. The guidance in ASC 105 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has revised its
references to pre-Codification GAAP and noted no impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
3. Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 985 and SAB 104 when the following four criteria are met:
- (i)
- persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists;
- (ii)
- delivery
has occurred;
- (iii)
- the
fee is fixed or determinable; and
- (iv)
- collection
is probable.
Some
customer arrangements encompass multiple deliverables, such as software, maintenance fees, and software development fees. If the deliverables meet the criteria in ASC 605 (formerly
EITF Issue No. 00-21), the deliverables are divided into separate units of accounting and revenue is allocated to the deliverables based on their relative fair values. The criteria
specified in ASC 605 are as follows:
- (i)
- the
delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis;
- (ii)
- there
is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item; and
- (iii)
- if
the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered
probable and substantially in the control of the vendor.
17
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
3. Revenue Recognition (Continued)
For the Company's purposes, fair value is generally defined as the price at which a customer could purchase each of the elements independently from other vendors or as the price that the
Company has sold the element separately to another customer. Management applies judgment to ensure appropriate application of ASC 605, including value allocation among multiple deliverables,
determination of whether undelivered elements are essential to the functionality of delivered elements and timing of revenue recognition, among others.
ASC
985 (formerly AICPA SOP No. 98-9) requires that revenue be recognized using the "residual method" in circumstances when vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE")
exists only for undelivered elements. Under the residual method, revenue is recognized as follows: (1) the total fair value of undelivered elements, as indicated by VSOE, is deferred and
subsequently recognized in accordance with the relevant sections of ASC 985, and (2) the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered elements is
recognized as revenue related to the delivered elements.
Applicable
revenue recognition criteria is considered separately for each separate unit of accounting as follows:
-
- Revenue from professional service arrangements is generally determined based on time and materials. Revenue for
professional services is recognized as the services are performed. Billing for services rendered generally occurs within one month after the services are provided.
-
- Royalty revenue is recognized when the royalty amounts owed to the Company have been earned, are determinable, and
collection is probable. Subscriptions are paid in advance and revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the subscription. These revenues include the licensing of digital watermarking products and
services for use in authenticating documents, detecting fraudulent documents and deterring unauthorized duplication or alteration of high-value documents, for use in communicating
copyright, asset management and business-to-business image commerce solutions, and for use in connecting analog media to a digital environment.
-
- Software revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 985 (formerly AICPA SOP No. 97-2, as amended by
AICPA SOP No. 98-9). Revenue for licenses of the Company's software products is recognized upon the Company meeting the following criteria: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred; the vendor's fee is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is probable. Software revenue is recognized over the term of the license or upon delivery and acceptance if
the Company grants a perpetual license with no further obligations.
-
- Maintenance revenue is recognized when the maintenance amounts owed to the Company have been earned, are determinable, and
collection is probable. Maintenance contracts are, at times, paid in advance and revenue is recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the term of the service period.
-
- The Company records revenue from some customers upon cash receipt as a result of collectibility not being reasonably
assured.
18
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
3. Revenue Recognition (Continued)
-
- Revenue earned which has not been invoiced at the last day of the period, but which is generally billed within one to two
weeks of the last day of the period, is included in trade accounts receivables, net in the balance sheets.
-
- Deferred revenue consists of billings in advance for professional services, licenses, subscriptions and hardware for which
revenue has not been earned.
4. Segment Information
The Company derives its revenue from a single reporting segment: media management solutions. Revenue is generated in this segment
through licensing of intellectual property, subscriptions to various products and services, and the delivery of services pursuant to contracts with various customers. The Company markets its products
in the U.S. and in non-U.S. countries through its sales personnel.
Revenue,
based upon the "bill-to" location, by geographic area is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
2,165 |
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
$ |
5,718 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,274 |
|
International |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
7,804 |
|
|
|
|
5,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,769 |
|
$ |
3,181 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
$ |
13,522 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company's revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Consortium of Central Banks |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
51 |
% |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
The Nielsen Company |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
TVaura LLC |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation includes expense charges for all stock-based awards to employees and directors. These awards include option grants and restricted stock awards.
Stock-based
compensation expense was allocated to the predecessor based on a combination of specific and shared services resource allocations from Old Digimarc. All cash flow related to
stock compensation generated by Old Digimarc was retained by Digimarc. Stock-based compensation recognized in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 was based on
the value of the portion of the stock-based award that vested during the period. Compensation cost for all stock-based awards is recognized using the straight-line method.
Determining Fair Value
Preferred Stock
The Board of Directors authorized 10,000 shares of Series A Redeemable Nonvoting Preferred stock to be issued to the executive
officers. The Series A Redeemable Nonvoting Preferred stock has no voting rights, except as required by law, and may be redeemed by the Board of Directors at any time on or after
June 18, 2013.
The
fair value of Series A Redeemable Nonvoting Preferred stock is based on the stated fair value of $5.00 per share, and the related stock compensation expense is recognized over
the non-redeemable period of 5 years, or 60 months, through June 2013 using the straight-line method.
Valuation and Amortization Method. The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based awards granted using the Black-Scholes option
valuation model.
The Company amortizes the fair value of all awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods, which are generally the vesting periods. The fair value of each option grant
is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Expected Term (Life). The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. The
Company
determined the initial expected life based on a simplified method in accordance with ASC 718 (also formerly SAB No. 110 "Shared-Based Payment"),
giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and pre-vesting and
post-vesting forfeitures. Stock options granted generally vest over four years for employee grants and two years for director grants, and have contractual terms of ten years.
Expected Volatility. The Company estimated the initial volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on an independent
analysis of a peer
group's historical volatility of their common stock using the Black-Scholes option valuation model based on historical stock prices over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected
life of the award.
Risk-Free Interest Rate. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model on an
interest rate on a Treasury bond with a maturity commensurate with each expected term estimate.
20
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
Expected Dividend Yield. The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the
foreseeable future. Consequently, the Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the Black-Scholes option valuation model.
Expected Forfeitures. The Company uses a zero forfeiture for both the stock options granted to employees, which vest monthly, and the
stock options
granted to the Company's directors, which vest 50% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and then monthly thereafter. The Company records stock-based compensation expense only for those awards
that are expected to vest, including awards made to directors who are expected to continue with the Company through the year following the date of grant. Forfeitures that occur during the month are
not expensed.
A
summary of the weighted average assumptions and results for options granted during the period August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
Period August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
Expected life (in years) |
|
5.6 - 6.0 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
70% - 72% |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
2.8% - 2.9% |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
0% |
|
Expected forfeiture rate |
|
0% |
The
estimated average fair value of outstanding stock options was $6.28 per share at September 30, 2009.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors awarded restricted stock shares under the Company's 2008 Stock Incentive Plan to
certain employees. The shares subject to the restricted stock awards vest over a certain period, usually four years, following the date of the grant. Specific terms of the restricted stock awards is
governed by Restricted Stock Agreements between the Company and the award recipients.
The
fair value of restricted stock awards granted is based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant (measurement date), and is recognized over the
vesting period of the related restricted stock using the straight-line method.
21
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Stock-based compensation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
629 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009, the Company had 10,000 shares of Series A redeemable nonvoting preferred stock, 1.0 million non-vested options to purchase common
stock and 141,400 shares of restricted common stock outstanding. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $6,906 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
stock-based awards granted under all equity compensation plans, including preferred stock, stock options and restricted stock. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for any future
changes in estimated forfeitures. The Company expects to recognize this compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock over a weighted average period of 1.54 years and
1.82 years, respectively, through June 2013.
As of September 30, 2009, under all of the Company's stock-based compensation plans, options to purchase an aggregate of
1.2 million shares were outstanding, and options to purchase an additional 1.1 million shares were authorized for future grants under the plans. The Company issues new shares upon option
exercises.
22
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
Options
granted, exercised, canceled and expired under the Company's stock option plans are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life |
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,224,000 |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(15,713 |
) |
$ |
9.64 |
|
|
|
Options canceled or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,208,287 |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
9.09 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
249,573 |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
9.10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life |
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,194,000 |
|
$ |
9.64 |
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
30,000 |
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(15,713 |
) |
$ |
9.64 |
|
|
|
Options canceled or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,208,287 |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
9.09 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
249,573 |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
9.10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Number
Outstanding |
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years) |
|
Weighted
Average
Price |
|
Number
Exercisable |
|
Weighted
Average
Price |
|
$9.64 |
|
|
1,178,287 |
|
|
9.08 |
|
$ |
9.64 |
|
|
239,573 |
|
$ |
9.64 |
|
$9.91 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
9.58 |
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$9.64 - $9.91 |
|
|
1,208,287 |
|
|
9,09 |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
|
249,573 |
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options was $6,698 and $1,382, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value is based on
our closing price of $15.19 per share on September 30, 2009, which would have been received by the optionees had all of the options with exercise prices less than $15.19 per share been
exercised on that date.
23
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
5. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
The following table reconciles the unvested balance of restricted stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three-months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
Number of
Shares |
|
Unvested balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
133,400 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
141,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
Number of
Shares |
|
Unvested balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
141,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
$ |
3,027 |
|
$ |
3,839 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
3,027 |
|
$ |
3,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid deferred revenues included in accounts receivable |
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
$ |
2,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company's best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company's existing
accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience and current information. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts monthly.
Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.
24
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
6. Trade Accounts Receivable (Continued)
The unpaid deferred revenues that are included in accounts receivable are billed in accordance with the provisions of the contracts
with the Company's customers. Unpaid deferred revenues from cash-basis revenue recognition customers are not included in accounts receivable nor deferred revenue accounts.
Customers who accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable, net, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
Central Banks |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
58 |
% |
The Nielsen Company |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
27 |
% |
7. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Property and equipment under capital lease obligations are stated at the lower of the present value of minimum lease payments at the beginning
of the lease term or fair value of the leased assets at the inception of the lease. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred.
The
property and equipment related to the Company were separated from Old Digimarc and recorded at net book value (cost less accumulated depreciation) and classified as used property and
equipment.
Depreciation
on property and equipment is calculated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally two to seven years. Property and
equipment held
under capital leases are amortized by the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life. Amortization of property and equipment under capital lease
is included in depreciation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
Office furniture fixture |
|
$ |
291 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
793 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
413 |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
1,404 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
8. Intangible AssetsPurchase and Capitalized Patent Costs
Costs associated with the application and award of patents in the U.S. and various other countries are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
patents as determined at award date, which varies depending on the pendency period of the application, generally approximating seventeen years. Capitalized patent costs include internal legal labor,
professional legal fees, government filing fees and translation fees related to obtaining the Company's patent portfolio.
Costs
associated with the maintenance and annuity fees of patents are accounted for as prepaid assets at the time of payment and amortized over the respective periods, generally from one
to four years.
Intangible
assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
Gross intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,113 |
|
$ |
462 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
Net loss from joint ventures |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
$ |
179 |
|
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income from the Company's cash and short-and long-term marketable securities and the net losses from the Company's
joint ventureswith The Nielsen Company, TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC.
10. Income Taxes
Old Digimarc. The provision for income taxes reflects withholding tax expense in various foreign jurisdictions. For all historic periods
reported in
the financial statements, Old Digimarc maintained valuation allowances against its net deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carry-forwards, because it was not more likely than not that
such deferred taxes would be realized. The provision for income taxes included foreign taxes withheld by Old Digimarc's customers and paid to foreign
26
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
10. Income Taxes (Continued)
jurisdictions
on its behalf. The predecessor financial statements indicate cumulative losses through August 1, 2008.
Furthermore,
the amounts of cumulative expenses in the financial statements that were not allowed for federal and state income tax purposes were not sufficient to result in positive
taxable income which would have required the Company to record income tax expense. As a result, no Federal or state income tax benefit was recognized for the book losses that were incurred in those
periods prior to 2007 and no income tax expense was recognized during the 2007 and 2008 periods because any expense was offset by the benefit of net operating loss carry-forwards. Digimarc as a
separate legal entity will not
benefit from any of the carry-forward tax attributes of Old Digimarc, including net operating loss carry-forwards.
Digimarc. The provision for income taxes reflects withholding tax expense in various foreign jurisdictions. These withholding taxes are
computed by
the Company's customers and paid to foreign jurisdictions on its behalf. There was no provision for current income taxes related to net income because the computation of taxable income resulted in a
net operating loss for the period.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Certain of the Company's product license and services agreements include an indemnification provision for claims from third parties relating to the Company's intellectual property. Such
indemnification provisions are accounted for in accordance with ASC 450 "Contingencies" (formerly SFAS No. 5, Accounting
for Contingencies). To date, there have been no claims made under such indemnification provisions.
The
Company is subject from time to time to other legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be
determined, management believes that, as of September 30, 2009, the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity of the Company. No accrual has been recorded because the amounts are not probable or reasonably estimatable in accordance with ASC 450.
12. Stock Repurchases
In April 2009, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase, at the discretion of management, of up to $5,000 of our common stock through either
periodic open-market or private transactions at then prevailing market prices over a period of up to two years through April 30, 2010. For the three- and nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009, the Company had paid $822 to repurchase 59,355 shares of outstanding common stock under this program since the program's inception.
27
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
13. Related Party Transactions
In connection with the two joint ventures entered into with Nielsen in July 2009, the Company
recognized $575 in revenues for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 in connection with technical and development services provided to TVaura LLC.
The
net loss from the joint ventures included in other income (expense), net for both the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 were $(292) for
TVaura LLC and $(19) for TVaura Mobile LLC.
There
were net accounts receivable of $214 and $6 from TVaura, LLC and TVaura Mobile, LLC at September 30, 2009, respectively. There were no net accounts payable to
either joint venture at September 30, 2009.
14. Subsequent Events
In accordance with ASC 855 "Subsequent Events" (formerly SFAS 165, Subsequent
Events), the Company is required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated for disclosure. Subsequent events were evaluated through
October 29, 2009, which is the date the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
15. Quarterly Financial InformationUnaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
Quarter ended:
|
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue |
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
$ |
2,827 |
|
License and subscription revenue |
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
4,429 |
|
|
4,324 |
|
|
4,769 |
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
1,541 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
3,228 |
|
Gross profit percent, service revenue |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
43 |
% |
|
47 |
% |
Gross profit percent, license and subscription revenue |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
|
98 |
% |
Gross profit percent, total |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
65 |
% |
|
68 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
745 |
|
|
728 |
|
|
753 |
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
1,191 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
1,566 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
277 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
262 |
|
Transitional services |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
(48 |
) |
|
(45 |
) |
Operating loss |
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
(814 |
) |
|
(499 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
(678 |
) |
|
(687 |
) |
Loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per sharebasic & diluted |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic and diluted |
|
|
7,158 |
|
|
7,158 |
|
|
7,134 |
|
28
Table of Contents
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
15. Quarterly Financial InformationUnaudited (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Predecessor |
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
July 1
through
August 1 |
|
|
|
Period
August 2
through
September 30 |
|
|
|
Quarter ended:
|
|
March 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenue |
|
$ |
2,548 |
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
$ |
2,419 |
|
License and subscription revenue |
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
5,085 |
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
4,651 |
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
1,428 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
3,223 |
|
Gross profit percent, service revenue |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
45 |
% |
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
44 |
% |
Gross profit percent, license and subscription revenue |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
Gross profit percent, total |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
67 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
656 |
|
|
683 |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
764 |
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
922 |
|
|
910 |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
992 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
980 |
|
|
927 |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
1,945 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
478 |
|
|
448 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
184 |
|
Transitional services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
(84 |
) |
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
641 |
|
|
443 |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
(578 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
924 |
|
|
664 |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
(324 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per sharebasic & diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
7,156 |
|
Pro-forma earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per sharebasic & diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic and diluted |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements relating to future events or the future financial performance of Digimarc, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Please see the discussion regarding forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the caption
"Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995."
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the disclosures made in Part II, Item 1A (Risk Factors) of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on February 27, 2009 (the "2008 Annual Report")
and in the audited financial statements and related notes included in our 2008 Annual Report, and other reports and filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC").
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to (i) "Digimarc," "we," "our" and "us" refer to
Digimarc Corporation and (ii) "Old Digimarc" refers to the former Digimarc Corporation, which merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.
("L-1") on August 13, 2008, and its consolidated subsidiaries (other than us).
The Separation of the Digital Watermarking Business from Old Digimarc
On August 1, 2008, Old Digimarc spun off the common stock of Digimarc, which held all of the assets and liabilities of Old
Digimarc's Digital Watermarking Business.
Until
August 1, 2008, we were a wholly owned subsidiary of DMRC LLC, which immediately prior to the spin-off was a wholly owned subsidiary of Old Digimarc.
DMRC LLC was formed in Delaware on June 18, 2008, in anticipation of the spin-off of the Digital Watermarking Business. Prior to the spin-off, in a transaction
which we refer to as the restructuring, Old Digimarc contributed all of the assets and liabilities related to its Digital Watermarking Business, together with all of Old Digimarc's cash, including
cash received upon the exercise of stock options, to DMRC LLC. The restructuring did not result in the loss of any significant Digital Watermarking Business customers or contracts.
Following
the restructuring, all of the limited liability company interests of DMRC LLC were transferred to a newly created trust for the benefit of Old Digimarc record holders on
the basis of one limited liability company interest of DMRC LLC for every three and one-half shares of Old Digimarc common stock held by the stockholder as of the
spin-off record date and time. DMRC LLC then merged with and into DMRC Corporation, and each limited liability company interest of DMRC LLC was converted into one share of
common stock of DMRC Corporation. After completion of the acquisition of Old Digimarc by L-1, DMRC Corporation changed its name to Digimarc Corporation. As a result, upon effectiveness of
the Form 10 on October 16, 2008, each Old Digimarc record holder received one share of Digimarc common stock for every three and one-half shares of Old Digimarc common stock
held by the stockholder as of the spin-off record date and time, and we became an independent, publicly-traded company owning and operating the Digital Watermarking Business.
Recent DevelopmentsNielsen Joint Venture
On July 1, 2009, we commenced operation of two joint ventures with The Nielsen Company (US) LLC, or Nielsen. In
connection with these joint ventures, we terminated our agreement with Nielsen, dated as of October 1, 2007, to enter into the joint venture agreements, and entered into a new patent license
agreement. Under the terms of the new patent license agreement, we granted Nielsen a non-exclusive license to Digimarc patents for use within Nielsen's business and Nielsen
30
Table of Contents
agreed
to pay us $18.75 million as follows: $2.0 million for the remainder of 2009; $3.6 million in 2010; $4.0 million in each of 2011, 2012 and 2103; and
$1.15 million in 2014.
Under
the first joint venture, TVaura LLC, Digimarc and Nielsen will engage in the development of copyright filtering solutions, royalty/audit solutions for online video and audio
rights organizations, guilds or other organizations involved in the reconciliation of royalties, residuals and other payments, and other related products. Under the second joint venture, TVaura
Mobile LLC, Digimarc and Nielsen will engage in the development of certain enhanced television offerings, and other related products. We will provide technical and development services to
TVaura LLC's business for the following periods for the following minimum service fees, subject to adjustment for any development service fees paid to Digimarc by TVaura Mobile LLC:
$1.13 million for the remainder of 2009; $2.80 million in 2010; and $2.74 million in 2011.
The
initial cash contribution of each of Digimarc and Nielsen to TVaura LLC will be an aggregate of $3.9 million payable in quarterly installments from July 2009 through
October 2011. The initial cash contribution of each of Digimarc and Nielsen to TVaura Mobile LLC will be an aggregate of $2.8 million payable in quarterly installments from July 2009
through October 2011. Each of Digimarc and Nielsen own approximately half of each joint venture.
Overview
Digimarc Corporation enables governments and enterprises around the world to give digital identities to media and objects that
computers can sense and recognize and to which they can react. Our technology provides the means to infuse persistent digital information, perceptible only to computers and digital devices, into all
forms of media content. The unique digital identifier placed in media generally persists with it regardless of the distribution path and whether it is copied, manipulated or converted to a different
format, and does not affect the quality of the content
or the enjoyment or other traditional uses of it. Our technology permits computers and digital devices to quickly identify relevant data from vast amounts of media content.
Our
technology, and those of our licensees, span the complete range of media content, enabling our customers and those of our partners to:
-
- Quickly identify and effectively manage music, movies, television programming, digital images, documents and other printed
materials, especially in light of new non-linear distribution over the internet;
-
- Deter counterfeiting of money, media and goods, and piracy of movies and music;
-
- Support new digital media distribution models and methods to monetize media content;
-
- Leverage the power of ubiquitous computing to instantly link consumers to a wealth of information and/or interactive
experiences related to the media and objects they encounter each day;
-
- Provide consumers with more choice and access to media content when, where and how they want it;
-
- Enhance imagery and video by associating metadata or authenticate media content for government and commercial uses; and
-
- Better secure identity documents to enhance national security and combat identity theft and fraud.
At
the core of our intellectual property is a signal processing technology innovation known as "digital watermarking" which allows imperceptible digital information to be embedded in all
forms of digitally designed, produced or distributed media content and some physical objects, including
31
Table of Contents
photographs,
movies, music, television, personal identification documents, financial instruments, industrial parts and product packages. The digital information can be detected and read by a wide
range of computers, mobile phones, and other digital devices.
We
provide technology-based solutions directly and through our licensees. Our proprietary technology has proven to be a powerful element of document security, giving rise to our
long-term relationship with a consortium of central banks, which we refer to as the Central Banks, and many leading companies in the information technology industry. We and our licensees
have successfully propagated digital watermarking in music, movies, television broadcasts, images and printed materials. Digital watermarks have been used in these applications to improve media rights
and asset management, reduce piracy and counterfeiting losses, improve marketing programs, permit more efficient and effective distribution of valuable media content and enhance consumer entertainment
and commercial experiences.
To
protect our significant efforts in creating our technology, we have implemented an extensive intellectual property protection program that relies on a combination of patent,
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, and nondisclosure agreements and other contracts. We believe we have one of the world's most extensive patent portfolios in the field of digital
watermarking and related media enhancement innovations, with over 545 U.S. and foreign patents and more than 410 U.S. and foreign patent applications on file as of September 30, 2009.
Backlog. Based on projected commitments we have for the periods under contract with our respective customers, we anticipate our current
contracts as
of September 30, 2009 will generate approximately $46 million in revenue during the contractual terms of such contracts, currently up to five years. We expect more than $5 million
of this amount to be recognized as revenue during the remainder of 2009.
Some
factors that lead to increased backlog include:
-
- contracts with new customers;
-
- renewals with current customers;
-
- add-on orders to current customers; and
-
- contracts with longer contractual periods replacing contracts with shorter contractual periods.
Some
factors that lead to decreased backlog are:
-
- recognition of revenue associated with backlog currently in place;
-
- contracts with shorter contractual periods replacing contracts with longer contractual periods; and
-
- contracts ending with existing customers.
The
mix of these factors, among others, dictates whether our backlog increases or decreases for any given period. There is no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenue in
any particular period, because the orders, awards and contracts included in our backlog may be subject to modification, cancellation or suspension. We may not realize revenue on certain contracts,
orders or awards included in our backlog or the timing of such realization may change.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Detailed information on our critical accounting policies and estimates are set forth in our 2008 Annual Report in Part II,
Item 7 thereof ("Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"), under the caption "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates," which is incorporated
by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and have not changed.
32
Table of Contents
Results of Operationsthe Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared to the Periods July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 (predecessor)
and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008 (successor)
The following table presents our statements of operations data for the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
License and subscription |
|
|
41 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
31 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
32 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
30 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
68 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
70 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
16 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
25 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
33 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Transitional services |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
78 |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
5 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Our
revenue for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 decreased 3% to $4.8 million from $4.9 million compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008
through August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of lower license and royalty revenues from a few of our customers based
on a combination of contractual revenue provisions, lower royalty reporting from our licensees whose revenues were lower and receipt of cash from our cash basis customers whose revenues are
non-linear in nature, offset in part by increased project work from the consortium of Central Banks. In addition, as further discussed below, we incurred higher operating expenses for the
period during which we operated as a stand-alone company.
33
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
2,827 |
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
$ |
2,566 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
License and subscription |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,769 |
|
$ |
3,181 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
$ |
4,931 |
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Service. Service revenue consists primarily of software development and consulting services. The majority of service revenue
arrangements are
structured as time and materials consulting agreements, or fixed price consulting agreements. The majority of our services revenue is derived from contracts with an international consortium of Central
Banks, Nielsen, and the joint ventures between Nielsen and Digimarc, and other government agencies. The agreements can range from several months to several years in length, and our longer term
contracts are subject to work plans that are reviewed and agreed upon at least annually. These contracts generally provide for billing hours worked at predetermined rates and, to a lesser extent, for
cost reimbursement for third party costs and services. The increases or decreases in the services are generally subject to both volume and price changes. The volume of work is generally negotiated at
least annually and can be modified as the needs of the customers arise. We also have provisions in our longer term contracts that allow for specific hourly rate price increases on an annual basis to
account for cost of living variables. Contracts with other government agencies are
generally shorter term in nature, are less linear in billings and less predictable than our longer terms contracts since they are subject to government budgets and funding.
The
increase in service revenue for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 and
August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, was due primarily to increased revenue from additional program work from the Central Banks and government contract revenues that are
non-linear in nature, offset in part by lower consulting revenues from Nielsen, including the revenues from the joint venture TVaura LLC, where we were engaged at an accelerated
level of services in the initial year of the contract with Nielsen.
License and subscription. License revenue originates primarily from licensing our technology and patents where we receive royalties as
our income
stream. Subscription revenue consists primarily of royalty revenue from the sale of our web-based subscriptions related to various software products, which are more recurring in nature.
Revenues from our licensed products have minimal associated direct costs, and thus are highly profitable.
The
decrease in license and subscription revenue for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1,
2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, were due primarily to lower royalty reporting and lower receipts of cash from our cash basis customers.
34
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue by geography: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
2,165 |
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
$ |
(336 |
) |
|
(13 |
)% |
|
International |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
174 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,769 |
|
$ |
3,181 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
$ |
4,931 |
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Domestic
revenue decreased for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008
and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, due primarily to lower revenues from Nielsen, including the revenues from the joint venture TVaura LLC, and to a lesser extent lower
revenues from our royalty reporting licensees.
International
revenue slightly increased for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008
and August 2, 2008 through
September 30, 2008, due primarily to increased revenue from the Central Banks, offset by lower revenues from our royalty reporting licensees.
Service. Cost of service revenue primarily includes costs that are allocated from research, development, engineering and sales and
marketing that
relate directly to producing revenue under our customer contracts, and, to a lesser extent, direct costs of program delivery for both personnel and operating expenses. Allocated costs
include:
-
- salaries, a payroll tax and benefit factor, incentive compensation and related costs of our software developers, quality
assurance personnel, product managers, business development managers and other personnel where we bill our customers for time and materials costs;
-
- payments to outside contractors that are billed to customers;
-
- charges for equipment directly used by the customer;
-
- depreciation charges for machinery, equipment and software; and
-
- travel costs directly attributable to service and development contracts.
License and subscription. Cost of license and subscription revenue primarily includes:
-
- patent or software license costs for any patents licensed from third parties where the party receives a portion of
royalties or license revenue received by Digimarc; and
-
- internet service provider connectivity charges and image search data fees to support the services offered to our
subscription customers.
35
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
1,328 |
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
|
$ |
394 |
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
License and subscription |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
(17 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,228 |
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit (as % of related revenue components): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
71 |
% |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
decrease in gross profit dollars for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 and
August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008 primarily reflect the impact of variations in scheduled payments in certain of our long-term contracts; lower consulting revenues
from Nielsen, including the revenues from the joint venture TVaura LLC; and to a lesser extent, lower royalties from some patent and technology licensees.
The
decrease in gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through
August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, was due primarily to:
-
- revenue mix resulting in lower license revenue, as a percent of total revenue, which carries a higher margin than service
revenue; and
-
- higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to the shared services
allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
Operating Expenses
The financial information in the predecessor financial statements does not include all of the expenses that
would have been incurred had the predecessor operated as a separate, stand-alone public entity. As such, the predecessor financial information does not reflect the operating expenses of Digimarc's
current business had the predecessor been a separate, stand-alone public entity during the periods presented in the predecessor's financial statements. Additionally, the predecessor financial
statements include proportional allocations of various shared services common costs of Old Digimarc because specific identification of these expenses was not practicable. It is expected that the
initial operating costs of Digimarc on a stand-alone basis will be higher than those allocated to the predecessor operations under the shared services methodology applied in the predecessor financial
statements. Consequently, the operating expenses reflected in the predecessor financial statements may not be indicative of those that would have been achieved had the predecessor operated as a
separate, stand-alone entity for the periods reflected in the predecessor financial statements. The operating
36
Table of Contents
expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 are consistent with our expectations as a stand-alone entity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Decrease |
|
Percent
Decrease |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
753 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
$ |
979 |
|
$ |
(226 |
) |
|
(23 |
)% |
Sales and marketing (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Sales
and marketing expenses consist primarily of:
-
- compensation, benefits and related costs of sales and marketing employees and product managers;
-
- travel and market research costs, and costs associated with marketing programs, such as trade shows, public relations and
new product launches;
-
- incentive compensation in the form of bonuses and stock-based compensation expense; and
-
- charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology.
We
allocate certain costs of sales and marketing to cost of service revenue when they relate directly to our service contracts. For direct billable labor hours, we allocate to cost of
service revenue:
-
- salaries;
-
- a payroll tax and benefits factor; and
-
- incentive compensation related to our bonus and stock compensation plans.
We
record all remaining, or "residual," costs as sales and marketing costs.
The
decrease in sales and marketing expense for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008
and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from delayed spending on various projects due to the effects of the slowdown in the economic environment, offset in part
by higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to the shared services allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
We
anticipate that we will continue to incur sales and marketing costs at higher levels to support ongoing sales initiatives.
37
Table of Contents
Research, development and engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase |
|
Percent
Increase |
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
$ |
1,019 |
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
17 |
% |
Research, development and engineering (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Research,
development and engineering expenses arise primarily from three areas that support our business model:
-
- Fundamental Research:
-
- Investigation of new watermarking algorithms to increase robustness and/or computational efficiency;
-
- Mobile device usage models and imaging sub-systems in camera-phones;
-
- Industry conference participation and authorship of papers for industry journals;
-
- Development of new intellectual property, including documentation of claims and production of supporting diagrams and
materials;
-
- Video watermarking research focused on low-bit rate video applications; and
-
- Research in fingerprinting and other content identification technologies.
-
- Platform Development:
-
- Continued development and porting to different operating systems of the Digimarc Global Software Development Kit, or SDK
(DGSDK), which packages the core image watermarking algorithms for Print & Imaging applications;
-
- Development and support of the Geo-Spatial SDK (GEOSDK) for geospatial imaging applications;
-
- Tuning and optimization of implementation models to improve resistance to non-malicious attacks and routine
transformations, such as JPEG, cropping and printing; and
-
- Creation of a platform to encapsulate fixed point watermarking algorithms, optimized for mobile devices.
-
- Product Development:
-
- Migration of applications to new platforms, specifically linking Digimarc for Images (formerly known as ImageBridge) to
DGSDK and Digimarc Mobile;
-
- Updating Digimarc for Images Plug-Ins for Photoshop CS4, including new interfaces and translation into 27
languages;
-
- Porting of Digimarc for Images SDK and related applications such as the Digimarc for Images Reader to various operating
systems, including Vista, Linux & OS X;
38
Table of Contents
-
- Development of Digimarc Mobile reader prototype for new mobile devices; and
-
- Prototype UGC site ingest, queue, and content management system to demonstrate potential applications of digital
watermarking.
Research,
development and engineering expenses consist primarily of:
-
- compensation, benefits and related costs of software developers and quality assurance personnel;
-
- payments to outside contractors;
-
- the purchase of materials and services for product development;
-
- incentive compensation in the form of bonuses and stock-based compensation expense; and
-
- charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology.
We
allocate certain costs of research, development and engineering to cost of service revenue when they relate directly to our service contracts. For direct billable labor hours, we
allocate to cost of service revenue:
-
- salaries;
-
- a payroll tax and benefits factor; and
-
- incentive compensation related to our bonus and stock compensation plans.
We
record all remaining, or "residual," costs as research, development and engineering costs.
The
increase in research, development and engineering expense for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through
August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from:
-
- increased headcount and employee compensation related expenses from hiring additional engineers and scientists to
facilitate expected growth in service revenue and to increase our investment in research and development; and
-
- higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to the shared services
allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
We
anticipate that we will continue to invest in research, development and engineering expenses at existing or higher levels in the near term to support certain ongoing product
initiatives and service contracts, and expect to moderate spending in the longer term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase |
|
Percent
Increase |
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
$ |
932 |
|
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
$ |
1,374 |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
14 |
% |
General and administrative (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
We
incur general and administrative costs in the functional areas of finance, legal, human resources, executive and board of directors. Costs for facilities and information technology
are also
39
Table of Contents
managed
as part of the general and administrative processes and are allocated to this line item as well as each of the line items in costs of services, sales and marketing, and research development
and engineering. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of:
-
- compensation, benefits and related costs;
-
- third party and professional fees associated with legal, accounting, human resources and costs associated with being a
public company;
-
- incentive compensation in the form of bonuses and stock-based compensation expense; and
-
- charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology.
The
increases in general and administrative expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through
August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to
the shared services allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
We
anticipate that we will continue to incur general and administrative expenses at least at existing levels, while continuing to examine means to reduce general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue in the longer term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Decrease |
|
Percent
Decrease |
|
Intellectual property |
|
$ |
262 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
$ |
296 |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
(11 |
)% |
Intellectual property (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
We
incur intellectual property expenses that arise primarily from costs associated with documenting, applying for, and maintaining domestic and international patents and trademarks:
Gross
expenditures for intellectual property costs, before reflecting the effect of capitalized patent costs, primarily consist of:
-
- compensation, benefits and related costs of attorneys and legal assistants;
-
- third party costs including filing and governmental regulatory fees and fees for outside legal counsel and translation
costs, each incurred in the patent process;
-
- incentive compensation in the form of bonuses and stock-based compensation expense; and
-
- charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology.
Prior
to August 2, 2008, the predecessor accounted for gross expenditures for intellectual property costs as expenses. On August 2, 2008 we began capitalizing patent
application and award costs.
The
decrease in intellectual property expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1,
2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from capitalized patent application and award costs
40
Table of Contents
aggregating
$0.2 million, offset by expenses related to legal services in support of intellectual property licensing activities.
We
anticipate that we will continue to invest in intellectual property expenses at current levels or higher.
In connection with the sale of Old Digimarc's Secure ID Business and the spin-off of the Digital Watermarking Business, Old
Digimarc and Digimarc entered into a transition services agreement to provide one another with transition services and other assistance substantially consistent with the services provided before the
spin-off.
To
enable Old Digimarc to continue its operation of the Secure ID Business and facilitate the effective transition of the Digital Watermarking Business to Digimarc, under the transition
services agreement Old Digimarc provides the following services or support to Digimarc: information technology services and legal services. Similarly, Digimarc provides the following services or
support to Old Digimarc: accounting and tax services, information technology services, legal services, human resource services and facilities.
The
fees for the transition services generally are intended to cover each party's reasonable costs incurred in connection with providing the transition services. Hourly rates for
personnel performing transition services were determined based on fully loaded costs, taking into account base pay, a bonus based on obtaining target earnings, payroll taxes, benefit costs, a pro rata
portion of overhead charges paid by Old Digimarc or Digimarc, as applicable, and the current year stock compensation charge for the individual, divided by the total hours available for the employee
for the year, taking into account the need for administrative time.
The
net transitional services expenses reimbursed to Digimarc aggregated less than $0.1 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 and $0.2 million
for the period August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, and are expected to decline through the end of the year 2009 as the amount of transition services decline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase |
|
Percent
Increase |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
307 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
56 |
% |
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
1,075 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
370 |
|
|
457 |
% |
Intellectual property |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
380 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
629 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
362 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Old
Digimarc accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 718 "CompensationStock
Compensation" (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (Revised
2004)), which requires the
41
Table of Contents
measurement
and recognition of compensation for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, employee stock purchases under a stock purchase plan and restricted
stock awards based on estimated fair values. Stock compensation expense was allocated to the predecessor based on a combination of specific and shared services resource allocations from Old Digimarc.
The
increase in stock-based compensation expense for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1,
2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from Digimarc applying ASC 718 with respect to our initial stock-based awards compared to the shared services
allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Interest income, net |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
(54 |
)% |
Net loss from joint ventures |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
(100 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
19 |
|
|
112 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
$ |
179 |
|
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
(173 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Other
income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income from our cash and short- and long-term marketable securities and the net income (loss) from the joint
ventures with The Nielsen Company, TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC.
The
decrease in other income, net for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods July 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 and
August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from the net losses of $(292) and $(19) from TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC, respectively, and lower
interest earned on cash and investment balances, reflecting lower interest rates paid on these balances.
Old Digimarc. The provision for income taxes reflects expected tax expense from profitability in certain foreign jurisdictions. The
predecessor
recorded a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets at August 1, 2008 due to the uncertainty of realization of net operating losses. As a separate legal entity, we will not
benefit from any of the carry-forward tax attributes of Old Digimarc, including net operating loss carry-forwards.
Digimarc. There was no provision for income taxes of Digimarc, other than foreign withholding taxes, for the three-month period ended
September 30, 2009 since the estimated effective tax rate for the period ending December 31, 2009 is expected to be zero.
42
Table of Contents
Results of Operationsthe Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared to the Periods January 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 (predecessor)
and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008 (successor)
The following table presents our statements of operations data for the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
54 |
% |
|
License and subscription |
|
|
42 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
33 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
34 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
30 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
66 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
70 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
16 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
27 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
35 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
6 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Transitional services |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
83 |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Our
revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 decreased 11% to $13.5 million from $15.1 million compared to the combined periods
January 1, 2008 through August 1,
2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of lower license and royalty revenues from a few of our customers based on a combination of
contractual revenue provisions, lower royalty reporting from our licensees whose revenues were lower and receipt of cash from our cash basis customers whose revenues are non-linear in
nature, offset in part by increased project work from the consortium of Central Banks. In addition, as further discussed below, we incurred higher operating expenses for the period during which we
operated as a stand-alone company.
43
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Decrease |
|
Percent
Decrease |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
7,882 |
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
$ |
(219 |
) |
|
(3 |
)% |
|
License and subscription |
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
7,030 |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
(20 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,522 |
|
$ |
3,181 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,950 |
|
$ |
15,131 |
|
$ |
(1,609 |
) |
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Service. The decrease in service revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods
January 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, was due primarily to lower consulting revenues from Nielsen, including the revenues
from the joint venture TVaura LLC, where we were engaged at an accelerated level of services in the initial year of the contract with Nielsen, offset in part by increased revenue from
additional program work from the Central Banks.
License and subscription. The decrease in license and subscription revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, was due primarily to lower license revenue from
Nielsen in accordance with contractual terms, and lower royalty reporting and receipt of cash from our cash basis customers.
44
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Revenue by geography: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
5,718 |
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,274 |
|
$ |
7,815 |
|
$ |
(2,097 |
) |
|
(27 |
)% |
|
International |
|
|
7,804 |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
|
5,676 |
|
|
7,316 |
|
|
488 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,522 |
|
$ |
3,181 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,950 |
|
$ |
15,131 |
|
$ |
(1,609 |
) |
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Domestic
revenue decreased for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through August 1, 2008
and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, due primarily to lower revenues from Nielsen, including the revenues from the joint venture TVaura LLC, and to a lesser extent lower
revenues from our government contracts and our royalty reporting licensees.
International
revenue increased for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through August 1,
2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, due primarily to increased revenue from the Central Banks, offset by lower revenues from our royalty reporting licensees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Decrease |
|
Percent
Decrease |
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
$ |
3,692 |
|
$ |
(206 |
) |
|
(6 |
)% |
|
License and subscription |
|
|
5,482 |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
6,841 |
|
|
(1,359 |
) |
|
(20 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,968 |
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,286 |
|
$ |
10,533 |
|
$ |
(1,565 |
) |
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit (as % of related revenue components): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License and subscription |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
71 |
% |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
45
Table of Contents
The
decrease in gross profit dollars primarily reflect the impact of variations in scheduled payments in certain of our long-term contracts; lower consulting revenues from
Nielsen, including the joint venture TVaura LLC; and to a lesser extent, lower royalties from some patent and technology licenses.
The
decrease in gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008
through August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, was due primarily to:
-
- revenue mix resulting in lower license revenue, as a percent of total revenue, which carries a higher margin than service
revenue; and
-
- higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to the shared services
allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
Operating Expenses
The operating expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 are consistent with our expectations as a
stand-alone entity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Decrease |
|
Percent
Decrease |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
2,226 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,928 |
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
|
(4 |
)% |
Sales and marketing (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
decrease in sales and marketing expense for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through
August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from delayed spending on various projects due to the effects of the slowdown in the economic
environment, offset by higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to the shared services allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial
statements.
46
Table of Contents
Research, development and engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase |
|
Percent
Increase |
|
Research, development and engineering |
|
$ |
3,679 |
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,071 |
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
29 |
% |
Research, development and engineering (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
increase in research, development and engineering expense for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1,
2008 through August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from:
-
- increased headcount and employee compensation related expenses from hiring additional engineers and scientists to
facilitate expected growth in service revenue and to increase our investment in research and development; and
-
- higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to the shared services
allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase |
|
Percent
Increase |
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
$ |
932 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,349 |
|
$ |
3,281 |
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
45 |
% |
General and administrative (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
increase in general and administrative expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through
August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from higher expenses for the period during which we operated as a stand-alone company compared to
the shared services allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
47
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Decrease |
|
Percent
Decrease |
|
Intellectual property |
|
$ |
756 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
$ |
1,222 |
|
$ |
(466 |
) |
|
(38 |
)% |
Intellectual property (as % of total revenue) |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
decrease in intellectual property expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through
August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from capitalized patent application and award costs aggregating $0.6 million, offset by
expenses related to legal services in support of intellectual property licensing activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
156 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
$ |
99 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
58 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
208 |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
(27 |
)% |
Research, development and engineering |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
312 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
537 |
|
|
753 |
|
|
140 |
% |
Intellectual property |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
$ |
913 |
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
increase in stock-based compensation expense for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through
August 1, 2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from Digimarc applying ASC 718 with respect to our initial stock-based awards compared to the
shared services allocation methodology applied in the predecessor financial statements.
48
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Interest income, net |
|
$ |
436 |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
$ |
597 |
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
(45 |
)% |
Net loss from joint ventures |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
(100 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
(24 |
) |
|
27 |
|
|
113 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
(83 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
decrease in other income, net for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the combined periods January 1, 2008 through August 1,
2008 and August 2, 2008 through September 30, 2008, resulted primarily from the net losses of $(292) and $(19) from the joint ventures TVaura LLC and TVaura
Mobile LLC, respectively, and lower interest earned on cash and investment balances, reflecting lower interest rates paid on these balances.
Old Digimarc. The provision for income taxes reflects expected tax expense from profitability in certain foreign jurisdictions. The
predecessor
recorded a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets at August 1, 2008 due to the uncertainty of realization of net operating losses. As a separate legal entity, we will not
benefit from any of the carry-forward tax attributes of Old Digimarc, including net operating loss carry-forwards.
Digimarc. There was no provision for income taxes of Digimarc, other than foreign withholding taxes, for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009 since the estimated effective tax rate for the period ending December 31, 2009 is expected to be zero.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
42,600 |
|
$ |
41,099 |
|
Current (liquidity) ratio(1) |
|
|
16:1 |
|
|
11.9:1 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities |
|
$ |
41,445 |
|
$ |
40,168 |
|
Long-term marketable securities |
|
$ |
2,087 |
|
$ |
5,744 |
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and all marketable securities |
|
$ |
43,532 |
|
$ |
45,912 |
|
- (1)
- The
current (liquidity) ratio is calculated by taking total current assets divided total current liabilities.
The
$1.5 million increase in working capital resulted primarily from the maturity of some of our long-term investments, offset by investments in our business for both
capital and intellectual property initiatives, cash contributions to the joint ventures with The Nielsen Company and repurchases of our common stock as part of our stock repurchase program.
49
Table of Contents
Operating Cash Flow. The components of operating cash flows were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,174 |
) |
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
$ |
(3,989 |
) |
|
(220 |
)% |
Non-cash items |
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
631 |
|
|
33 |
% |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
(5,549 |
) |
|
|
|
8,951 |
|
|
3,402 |
|
|
(3,868 |
) |
|
(114 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
$ |
(5,080 |
) |
|
|
$ |
12,210 |
|
$ |
7,130 |
|
$ |
(7,226 |
) |
|
(101 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
Net income (loss). The decrease in operating results primarily reflects lower revenues, higher expenses for the period during which we
operated as a
stand-alone company compared to the benefits received from the shared services cost allocation methodology in the predecessor financial statements and initial losses from our new joint ventures with
Nielsen.
Non-cash items. The increase in non-cash items was primarily the result of the shared services allocation methodology applied
in the predecessor financial statements to both depreciation of property and equipment, stock compensation and net losses from the joint ventures.
The primary changes in the operating assets and liabilities for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009
relate to:
-
- collection of advanced billings, as provided in our contracts with customers; offset by
-
- the amortization of deferred revenues.
The
primary changes in the operating assets and liabilities for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 relate to:
-
- accrual for and payment of liabilities related to the merger of Old Digimarc with Dolomite, a wholly owned subsidiary of
L-1, offset by $3.7 million of proceeds received from L-1 for the purchase price shortfall provided for in the separation agreement.
-
- the timing and mix of service revenues, which generally carry a longer collection period than license revenues;
-
- the billings for revenues that are made in advance, as provided in our contracts with customers, and the related
collections of receivables, result in deferred revenues, the timing of which fluctuates and can change from period to period based on individual customer requirements; and
-
- the accrual for and payment of liabilities related to payroll and related costs, such as our 401(k) plan matching
contributions. This cost and associated liability were traditionally accrued each month and increase throughout each year and then paid out to participants in the first quarter after each year end.
For 2009, the matching contributions are paid out after each payroll.
50
Table of Contents
Cash flows from investing activities. The primary changes in the investing activities for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 relate to:
-
- investments made in property and equipment, primarily in our information technology area for computer systems and related
equipment used to operate our business;
-
- investments made in the patent application and granting process;
-
- investments made in joint ventures; and
-
- net activity from investing our cash and cash equivalents and short- and long-term marketable securities.
Cash flows from financing activities. The primary changes in the financing activities for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009 relate to purchases of common stock as part of the stock repurchase program, partially offset by the exercise of stock options.
The
primary changes in the financing activities for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 were the result of cash transactions associated with Old Digimarc in
accordance with the basis of accounting used in our financial statements. Specifically,
-
- all cash received from Old Digimarc's stock activity, primarily from the exercise of stock options, flows through to
Digimarc; and
-
- all cash flow generated or used by Old Digimarc flowed into or out of Digimarc.
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investment balances will satisfy our projected working
capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. Thereafter, we anticipate continuing to use cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances
to satisfy our projected working capital and capital expenditure requirements.
We
may utilize cash resources to fund acquisitions or investments in complementary businesses, technologies or product lines. In order to take advantage of opportunities, we may find it
necessary to obtain additional equity financing, debt financing, or credit facilities. We do not believe at this time, however, that our long-term working capital and capital expenditures
would require us to take steps to remedy any such potential deficiencies. If it were necessary to obtain additional financings or credit facilities, we may not be able to do so, or if these funds are
available, they may not be available on satisfactory terms.
Contractual Obligations
Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements with Nielsen, we will be contributing $6.7 million to the joint ventures
payable in quarterly installments from July 2009 through October 2011, which $6.2 million is outstanding as of September 30, 2009.
Our
significant commitments consist of obligations under non-cancelable operating leases for our facilities, rent and various equipment leases, which totaled
$1.7 million as of September 30, 2009 and are payable in monthly installments through February 2013. Other than as described above, as of September 30, 2009, there have been no
material changes in the contractual obligations disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report.
Adjusted EBITDA
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash
expenditures for stock compensation. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of
51
Table of Contents
financial
performance under generally accepted accounting principles. Management uses Adjusted EBITDA in internal analyses as a supplemental measure of our financial performance to assist it in
determining performance comparisons against its peer group of companies, as well as capital spending and other investing decisions. Adjusted EBITDA is also a common alternative measure of performance
used by investors, financial analysts, and rating agencies to evaluate financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net earnings, operating
income, cash flows provided by operating activities or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and this non-GAAP measure may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures of other companies.
The
following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
July 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(687 |
) |
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
$ |
227 |
|
$ |
(914 |
) |
|
(402 |
)% |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
(271 |
) |
|
147 |
|
|
(54 |
)% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
149 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
(22 |
)% |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
493 |
|
|
363 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
283 |
|
$ |
(313 |
) |
|
(111 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Total* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2009 |
|
Period
August 2,
2008
through
September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
Period
January 1,
2008
through
August 1,
2008 |
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
2008 |
|
Dollar
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Percent
Increase
(Decrease) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,174 |
) |
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
$ |
(3,989 |
) |
|
(220 |
)% |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
(786 |
) |
|
350 |
|
|
(45 |
)% |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
425 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
637 |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
(33 |
)% |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
913 |
|
|
895 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,317 |
|
$ |
2,590 |
|
$ |
(2,955 |
) |
|
(114 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- *
- Used
for comparative purposes
The
decreases in Adjusted EBITDA for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, compared to the corresponding three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008, were due primarily to lower revenues and higher operational costs incurred by Digimarc compared to the
52
Table of Contents
benefits
received from the shared services cost allocation methodology in the predecessor financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on
our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our business.
Recent Accounting Standards Update
See the disclosure related to Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") detailed in "Item 1. Financial Statements, Notes to Financial
Statements" under the caption "2. Recent Accounting Standards Update" of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. which is incorporated herein by reference.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. Words such as "may," "plan," "should," "could," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "believe," "project,"
"forecast," "estimate," "continue," variations of such terms or similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements, or other statements made by us, are made based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting us, and are subject to
uncertainties and factors (including those specified below), which are difficult to predict and, in many instances, are beyond our control. As a result, our actual results could differ materially from
those expressed in or implied by any such forward-looking statements, and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. Forward-looking statements include but are not limited
to statements relating to:
-
- concentration of revenues with few customers comprising a large majority of the revenues;
-
- trends and expectations in revenue growth;
-
- our future level of investment in our business and the joint ventures in which we have invested, including investment in
research, development and engineering of products and technology, development of our intellectual property, the acquisition of new customers and development of new market opportunities;
-
- our ability to improve margins;
-
- anticipated expenses, costs, margins and investment activities in the foreseeable future;
-
- anticipated revenue to be generated from current contracts and as a result of new programs;
-
- our profitability in future periods;
-
- business opportunities that could require that we seek additional financing;
-
- the size and growth of our markets;
-
- the existence of international growth opportunities and our future investment in such opportunities;
-
- the source of our future revenue;
-
- our expected short-term and long-term liquidity positions;
53
Table of Contents
-
- our ability to fund our working capital needs through cash flow from operations;
-
- our use of cash in upcoming quarters;
-
- capital market conditions, including the recent economic crisis, interest rate volatility and other limitations on the
availability of capital, which could have an impact on our cost of capital and our ability to access the capital markets;
-
- anticipated levels of backlog and bid activity in future periods;
-
- anticipated transitional services expenses to be reimbursed to us by Old Digimarc;
-
- protection of our intellectual property portfolio; and
-
- other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set forth in
"Item 1A. Risk Factors" of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Part II, Item1A ("Risk Factors") of our 2008 Annual Report.
We
believe that the factors described in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report and the risk factors contained in Part I, Item 1A of our 2008 Annual
Report, among others, could affect our future performance and the liquidity and value of our securities and cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Investors should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors and that there may be other factors that may cause
our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made by us or by persons acting on our behalf apply only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, information or circumstances that arise after the date of the filing of
this Quarterly on Form 10-Q.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The market risk disclosures as set forth in Item 7A of our 2008 Annual Report have not changed materially.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this
Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this Form 10-Q, were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
(i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Controls
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
54
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time in our normal course of business we are a party to various legal claims, actions and complaints. Arbitron filed a
Declaratory Judgment action against the Company in the US District Court in Delaware on August 13, 2009 (Civil Action Number 1:2009cv00604). In the Complaint, Arbitron refers to and
attaches a copy of Digimarc's letter of July 15, 2009, which notified Arbitron that its PPM technology may infringe Digimarc's patents and provided examples of potential relevance of nine
Digimarc patents. Arbitron seeks a declaratory judgment that these nine patents are invalid and that Arbitron does not infringe these patents. The complaint has been filed, but it has not been served
on Digimarc. Accordingly, Digimarc has not filed an answer to the complaint.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
More detailed information about risk factors that may affect actual results are set forth in Part I, Item 1A thereof
("Risk Factors") of our 2008 Annual Report.
The
following additional risks relate to changes to our business subsequent to the filing of our 2008 Annual Report. The risks and uncertainties described below, and in our 2008 Annual
Report, are those risks of which we are aware, that we consider to be material to our business. If any of the risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, our business, financial condition,
results of operations, or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline. Our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows may be affected by a number of factors, including the factors set forth below and in our 2008 Annual Report.
(1) The joint ventures agreements we entered into with Nielsen may not produce marketable products that will provide a return on investment on the initial cash
contributions.
We entered into two joint venture agreements with Nielsen to deliver products and services to enhance television viewing, facilitate
mobile commerce, and create valuable other new opportunities for television networks and consumer brands to more deeply engage with audiences. These products and services are new and untested, and
they may not have a ready market. We are nonetheless committed to provide financial support to both joint ventures through October 2011.
We
cannot predict how the market will react to our product offerings or any potential revenue that may or may not be realized. Our initial investment in these two joint ventures may
result in neither product offerings nor a return on investment.
(2) Our joint venture transactions with Nielsen may not realize all of their intended benefits.
In connection with TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC, our joint ventures with Nielsen, we may
experience:
-
- difficulties in integrating our corporate culture and business objectives with that of Nielsen into the joint ventures;
-
- diversion of our management's time and attention from other business objectives;
-
- higher than anticipated costs of integration, development and operations at the joint ventures;
-
- difficulties in hiring or retaining key employees who are necessary to manage the joint ventures; or
-
- difficulties in coordinating with an entity remote to our Beaverton, Oregon operations.
55
Table of Contents
Moreover,
since Nielsen has significant oversight and voting rights with respect to major business decisions of TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC, we do not have control
over the joint ventures' operations, including business decisions that may affect each joint venture's profitability or success in meeting its objectives. For any of these reasons, or as a result of
other factors, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the joint ventures, and our participation in the joint ventures could adversely affect the results of our other business efforts.
(3) Disagreements between Nielsen and us regarding the strategy and priorities of the joint ventures or shortage of additional funding for the joint ventures may impede the
development of the joint venture products, which could negatively affect the value of our investment in TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC.
TVaura LLC is a jointly owned company that we established with Nielsen to focus on the discovery, development and
commercialization of copyright filtering solutions, royalty/audit for online video and audio rights organizations, guilds or other organizations involved in reconciliation of royalties, residuals and
other payments, and other related products. TVaura Mobile LLC is a jointly owned company that we established with Nielsen to focus on the discovery, development and commercialization of certain
enhanced television offerings, and other related products.
As
part of these joint ventures, we licensed to each of TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC all of our patents and technology not already subject to exclusive license grants
to other licensees. Each of TVaura LLC and TVaura Mobile LLC is operated as an independent company and governed by a members' committee. We and Nielsen can elect an equal number of
representatives to serve on each members committee. Each joint venture plans to develop the contemplated products pursuant to an operating plan that is approved by the members' committee. Any
disagreements between Nielsen and us regarding a development decision or any other decision submitted to either joint venture's members' committee may cause significant delays in the development and
commercialization of the joint ventures' products and technology and could negatively affect the value of our investment in the joint ventures.
In
addition, neither we nor Nielsen have any obligation to fund the joint ventures beyond the initial cash contributions provided in the joint venture agreements. If the joint ventures
are unable to generate cash sufficient to develop and commercialize their products, and if additional funding is unavailable from us, Nielsen or third parties, we may not recognize the intended
benefits of the joint ventures.
(4) We may not be able to protect adequately our intellectual property by building business relationships with potential partners.
In the ordinary course of building strategic business relationships with potential partners we may encounter companies that we believe
are infringing on our patent portfolio. When we encounter these companies we believe are infringing, we try to negotiate a license to our patents. If we are unable to negotiate a license and continue
to believe they are infringing on our patents, we may file a lawsuit and to incur legal fees in the process. See Part II, Item 1 thereof ("Legal Proceedings") for additional
information related to this risk factor.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
In April 2009, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase, at the discretion of management, of
up to $5 million in shares of our common stock through either periodic open-market or private transactions at then-prevailing market prices over a period of up to two
years through April 30, 2010. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, we have paid $0.8 million to repurchase 59,355 shares of outstanding common stock
under this program since the program's inception.
56
Table of Contents
The
following table sets forth information regarding purchases of our equity securities during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
(a)
Total number of
shares (or units)
purchased |
|
(b)
Average price
paid per
share (or unit) |
|
(c)
Total number of
shares (or units)
purchased as
part of publicly
announced plans
or programs |
|
(d)
Maximum number
(or approximate
dollar value)
of shares (or units)
that may yet
be purchased
under the plans
or programs |
|
Month 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, 2009 to July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.0 million |
|
Month 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009 |
|
|
43,885 |
|
$ |
13.84 |
|
|
43,885 |
|
$ |
4.4 million |
|
Month 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009 |
|
|
15,470 |
|
$ |
13.89 |
|
|
15,470 |
|
$ |
4.2 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
59,355 |
|
$ |
13.85 |
|
|
59,355 |
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
57
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: October 29, 2009 |
|
DIGIMARC CORPORATION |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ MICHAEL MCCONNELL
Michael McConnell Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Duly Authorized Officer
and Principal Financial Officer) |
58