DigitalTown, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2007 May (Form 10-Q)
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
X
|
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended: May 31, 2007
|__|
|
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF
1934
|
Commission
file number: 000-27225
DigitalTown,
Inc.
(formerly
BDC Capital, Inc.)
(Name
of
small business issuer in its charter)
Minnesota
|
41-1427445
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
11974
Portland Avenue, Burnsville, Minnesota
|
55337
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
|
Registrant's
telephone number: (952)
890-2362
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Title
of Each Class
Common
Stock
Par
Value
$0.01 per share
Check
whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
X No ___
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
Filer [ ]
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer [X]
|
There
were 25,723,750 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of July
12, 2007.
ii
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
PART
I
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
1-12
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and Plan of Operation
|
13-16
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
17
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
17
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
18
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
18
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
18
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
18
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
18
|
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
18
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
18
|
|
|
|
iii
PART
I
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
Balance
Sheets
|
1
|
Statements
of Operations
|
2
|
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
3
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
4-12
|
DigitalTown,
Inc.
(formerly
BDC Capital, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
|
||||||||
May
31,
|
February
28,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2007
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
(audited)
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ |
15,390
|
$ |
8,933
|
||||
Other
receivable
|
28
|
999
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
15,418
|
9,932
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
5,154
|
1,579
|
||||||
Intangible
assets – domain names
|
656,727
|
441,558
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$ |
677,299
|
$ |
453,069
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ |
392,406
|
$ |
137,144
|
||||
Advances
from stockholders
|
5,704
|
16,354
|
||||||
Accrued
expenses:
|
||||||||
Accrued
payroll
|
20,152
|
32,169
|
||||||
Accrued
interest
|
10,876
|
9,476
|
||||||
Deferred
officer compensation
|
30,807
|
18,865
|
||||||
Notes
payable - stockholder
|
70,000
|
70,000
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
529,945
|
284,008
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000,000 shares authorized, 25,723,750
and
25,701,500 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2007
and February 28, 2007, respectively
|
257,233
|
257,010
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
14,579,475
|
14,521,673
|
||||||
Subscription
receivable
|
(2,795,501 | ) | (2,947,470 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(11,893,853 | ) | (11,662,152 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
147,354
|
169,061
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ |
677,299
|
$ |
453,069
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
1
DigitalTown,
Inc
(formerly
BDC Capital, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months
|
||||
Ended
|
||||
May
31, 2007
(unaudited)
|
||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
$ |
233,275
|
||
Loss
from operations
|
(233,275 | ) | ||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,400 | ) | ||
Other
income
|
2,974
|
|||
Total
other income (expense)
|
1,574
|
|||
Net
loss
|
$ | (231,701 | ) | |
Loss
per common share – basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
Weighted
average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted
|
25,711,658
|
|||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
2
DigitalTown,
Inc.
(formerly
BDC Capital, Inc.)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
Three
months
ended
May
31, 2007
|
|||
(unaudited)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (231,701 | ) | |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash flows used in operating
activities:
|
||||
Depreciation
|
381
|
|||
Stock
based compensation expense
|
7,962
|
|||
Non
cash stock payment
|
50,063
|
|||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||
Other
receivables
|
971
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses
|
-
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
59,022
|
|||
Accrued
expenses:
|
||||
Accrued
payroll
|
(12,017 | ) | ||
Accrued
interest
|
1,400
|
|||
Deferred
officer compensation
|
11,942
|
|||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(111,977 | ) | ||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||
Purchases
of fixed assets
|
(3,956 | ) | ||
Purchases
and renewal of intangible assets – domain
names
|
(18,929 | ) | ||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(22,885 | ) | ||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||
Advances
to officer/stockholder
|
(10,650 | ) | ||
Payments
received on stockholder subscription receivables net of $20,000
in
transaction costs for the subscription offering initiated in
fiscal
2006
|
151,969
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
141,319
|
|||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
6,457
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
8,933
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ |
15,390
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||
Cash
payments for interest
|
$ |
-
|
||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||
Intangible
assets-domain name renewals incurred with accounts payable
|
$ |
196,240
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
DigitalTown,
Inc.
(formerly
BDC Capital, Inc.)
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note
1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies:
Nature
of Business
DigitalTown,
Inc. (formerly known as BDC Capital, Inc.) (“The Company”) was formed as a
Minnesota corporation on April 7, 1982. It was incorporated under the name
Command Small Computer Learning Center, Inc., a computer training company.
In
1987, the Company changed its name to Command Electronics, Inc. In February
1995, the Company acquired CyberStar Computer Systems, a manufacturer and
marketer of microcomputers and servers, and in 1997 changed its name to
CyberStar Computer Corporation. In 2000, the Company changed its name to
eNetpc,
Inc. In November 2004, the Company changed its name to BDC Capital, Inc.
BDC
Capital, Inc. has engaged in the sale of computer components, development
of
software and resell of major computer brands. The names "BDC Capital, Inc."
"we", "our" and "us" used in this report refer to BDC Capital, Inc.
On
December 10, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors elected to be regulated as a
business development company (BDC) as outlined in the Investment Company
Act of
1940 by filing a Form NT-54A. As a BDC, the Company planned to focus on
current
opportunities available to this attractive business model in the somewhat
uncertain economic times.
On
August
31, 2006, the Company filed with the SEC to withdraw their “business development
company” status. The Company has changed its business plan to become a
multiple-site online social-networking community portal through the
internet. As part of that plan, the Company changed its name to
DigitalTown, Inc. effective March 1, 2007. The Company is currently
developing the DigitalTown portal. This portal, when complete, will
include features such as email, alumni communication and reunion tools,
chat, a
wide range of high school activities such as music, drama and athletics,
personal profiles, photo, video and music sharing and timely community
news. The Company is currently developing a revenue model associated
with the use of the DigitalTown portal.
The
company has sustained losses and negative cash flows from operations and
expects
these conditions to continue into the foreseeable future. At May 31,
2007, the company had an accumulated deficit of
$11,893,853. Subsequent to May 31, 2007, the company has received
cash proceeds totaling approximately $255,000 from its stock subscription
receivable. The company anticipates existing cash, proceeds received
to-date as well as expected future proceeds from its stock subscription
receivable and any additional financing needed through the sale of its
common
stock or other equity based securities, will be sufficient to meet its
working
capital and capital expenditures needs through at least May 31,
2008.
Principles
of Consolidation
As
a
result of the Company’s Business Development Company withdrawal, the Company now
files consolidated financial statements that include its controlled
Subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have
been
eliminated in consolidation.
4
The
election to withdraw the Company’s election as a Business Development Company
under the 1940 Act has resulted in a significant change in the Company's
required method of accounting. Business Development Company financial
statement presentation and accounting utilizes the fair value method of
accounting used by investment companies, which allows Business Development
Company’s to recognize income and value their investments at market value as
opposed to historical cost.
In
addition, majority-owned subsidiaries are not consolidated and instead,
investments in those subsidiaries are reflected on the balance sheet as
an
investment in and advances to affiliates, at fair value. As an
operating company, the required financial statement presentation and accounting
for securities held by the Company utilize either fair value or historical
cost
methods of accounting, depending on the classification of the investment
and the
Company's intent with respect to the period of time it intends to hold
the
investment, and the Company and its subsidiaries are reflected for financial
accounting purposes as a consolidated entity. The change in
accounting due to the conversion to an operating company from a Business
Development Company is considered a change in accounting principle.
Management
has retroactively applied this change in accounting principle in accordance
with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting for Changes and
Error Corrections” for the Company’s balance sheet as of February 28,
2006. As a business development company, the Company’s investment in
BDC Partners, Inc. was not previously audited prior to February 28,
2006. Management has determined that it is impractible and not cost
effective to retroactively apply this change in accounting to the previously
reported interim financial statements of BDC Capital, Inc. for the
three months ended May 31, 2006, per SFAS 154 par. 11. Therefore, the
statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended May
31, 2006
will not be comparative. However, these prior period financial
statements are included in Note 9 as originally filed for informational
purposes.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of
the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, other receivables, accounts
payable, accrued expenses and notes payable. Pursuant to SFAS No. 107
“Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” the Company is required
to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments at the balance
sheet
date. The company considers the carrying value of its financial
instruments in the financial statements to approximate fair value.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company does not currently generate revenue from its operations.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity
of three
months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
5
Intangible
Assets – Domain Names
The
Company is still in the development stage of its web site portal and
accordingly, all costs, including license renewals, associated with domain
names
expected to be utilized in its website portal have been
capitalized. Since the Company is still in the development stage of
its web site portal and the ownership of these domain names can be renewed
at a
nominal fee prior to their expiration date, the useful life of the domain
names
are deemed to be indefinite and no amortization will be recorded.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis
over
their estimated useful lives, ranging from two to five years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life or the term
of
the related lease. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred;
major
renewals and improvements are capitalized. As items of property or
equipment are sold or retired, the related cost and accumulated depreciation
are
removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in operating
income.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets – domain names are
reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that
the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
assets to be held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount
of
an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated
by
the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future
cash
flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are
recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating losses and
tax
credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable
temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between
the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred
tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets
will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted
for the
effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of the
enactment.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective
March 1, 2006, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”)
Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” applying the modified prospective
method. This standard requires the fair value of share-based
payments, including grants of employee stock options and employee stock
purchase
plan shares, to be recognized in the income statement based on their grant
date
fair values unless a fair value is not reasonably estimable. Prior to
the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the company followed the intrinsic
value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and its related interpretations, as
permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The fair value of the
Company’s stock options issued prior to and after the adoption of SFAS No.
123(R) has been estimated using a Black-Scholes pricing model, which assumes
no
expected dividends and estimates the option expected life, volatility and
risk-free interest rate at the time of the grant.
6
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive
income (loss) includes net income (loss) and items defined as other
comprehensive income (loss). Items defined as other comprehensive income
(loss)
include such items as foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized
gains (losses) on certain marketable securities. For the three months ended
May
31, 2007, the Company had no items defined as other comprehensive income
(loss).
Net
Loss Per Common Share
Basic
loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed using the
weighted average number of shares outstanding per share adjusted for the
incremental shares attributed to outstanding stock options under the Company's
stock option plans, convertible debt and convertible preferred
stock. Incremental shares attributable to the assumed exercise of
stock options and conversion of debt and preferred stock for the three
months
ended May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2006 were excluded from the computation
of
diluted loss per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS
No.
157"). This standard clarifies the principle that fair value should be
based on
the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset
or
liability. Additionally, it establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
the information used to develop those assumptions. This standard is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November
15,
2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of this statement. We believe
the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Cash
Deposits in Excess of Federally Insured Limits
The
Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may
exceed
federally insured limits. The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Company up to $100,000. Account balances in excess of
federally insured limits were $0 at May 31, 2007 and February 28,
2007. The Company has not experienced any losses in such
accounts.
Note
2. Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment are as follows:
May
31,
2007
|
February
28,
2007
|
|||||||
Office
equipment and furniture
|
$ |
477,176
|
$ |
473,220
|
||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(457,384 | ) | (457,003 | ) | ||||
Less
impairment of equipment
|
(14,638 | ) | (14,638 | ) | ||||
$ |
5,154
|
$ |
1,579
|
Depreciation
expense for the three months ended May 31, 2007 was $ 381.
7
Note
3. Notes Payable – Stockholder
As
of May
31, 2007, the Company had interest bearing advances from a stockholder
in the
amount of $70,000. The unsecured notes are due at various dates from
June 21, 2007 to August 1, 2007 with an interest rate of 8%. Accrued
interest at May 31, 2007 and February 28, 2007 totaled $10,876 and $9,476,
respectively.
Note
4. Stockholders Equity
On
October 4, 2006, the Company initiated a reverse stock split of 75 to
1. Accordingly, all per share amounts reported in the financial
statements for all periods have been retroactively restated to reflect
the
reverse stock split.
On
April
20, 2007, the Company issued 22,250 restricted common shares, valued at
$50,063,
to a Minneapolis area high school for their assistance in initially developing
the portal revenue model.
Note
5. Stock Options
The
Company has one stock option plan called The 2006 Employee Stock and Option
Plan. As of May 31, 2007, an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock
may
be granted under these plans determined by the board of directors. The
stock
options may be granted to directors, officers, employees, consultants and
advisors of the Company. Options granted under this plan are
non-qualified stock options and have exercise prices and vesting terms
established by the Board of Directors at the time of each
grant. Vesting terms of outstanding options range from immediate to
two years of employment anniversary. All options expire five years
from the date of grant.
Effective
March 1, 2006, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”)
Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the fair value
of share-based payments, including grants of employee stock options and
employee
stock purchase plan shares, to be recognized in the income statement based
on
their grant date fair values unless a fair value is not reasonably estimable.
Prior to the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company followed
the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”)
Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and its related
interpretations, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The fair value
of the Company’s stock options issued prior to and after the adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R) has been estimated using a Black-Scholes pricing model, which
assumes
no expected dividends and estimates the option expected life, volatility
and
risk-free interest rate at the time of grant.
The
Company elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method, under
which
prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the
impact
of SFAS No. 123(R). The valuation provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply
to new grants and to grants that were outstanding as of the effective date
and
are subsequently modified. The Company had no remaining estimated compensation
for grants that were outstanding as of the effective date that would need
to be
recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost
estimated for the SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosures. The Company’s
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended
May 31,
2007, reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). No options were granted for the
three
month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006. For the three months ended
May 31, 2007, the Company recorded related compensation expense of $7,962.
This
expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense. There
was no
tax benefit from recording this non-cash expense due to the Company having
a
full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The compensation
expense impacted the May 31, 2007 basic loss per common share by 0.00.
There
remains $208,990 of total unrecognized compensation expense, which is expected
to be recognized over future periods.
8
SFAS
123
(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment
awards
on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion
of
the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense
over the
requisite service periods in the Company’s consolidated statements of
operations. The Company uses the Black-Sholes-Merton (“Black Sholes”)
option-pricing model as a method for determining the estimated fair market
value
for employee stock awards. Compensation expense for employee stock awards
is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the award.
The
adoption of SFAS 123 (R) also requires certain changes to the accounting
for
income taxes and the method used in determining diluted shares, as well
as
additional disclosure related to the cash flow effects resulting from
share-based compensation. The relevant interpretive guidance of Staff Accounting
Bulletin 107 was applied in connection with its implementation and adoption
of
SFAS 123 (R).
The
following table summarizes information about the Company’s stock
options:
Number
of Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contract
Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(1)
|
|||||||||||||
Options
outstanding February 28, 2007
|
3,125,000
|
$ |
1.725
|
4.50
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Canceled
or expired
|
(270,000 | ) | (1.725 | ) |
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Options
outstanding - May 31, 2007
|
2,855,000
|
$ |
1.725
|
4.25
|
$ |
1,070,625
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at May 31, 2007
|
2,730,000
|
$ |
1.725
|
4.25
|
$ |
1,023,750
|
(1)
The
intrinsic of an option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying
stock exceeds its exercise price.
Note
6. Related Party Transactions
The
Company entered into a 5 year lease with a director of the Company for
approximately 1,000 square feet of space used for offices and operations
equipment storage at 11974 Portland Avenue, Burnsville,
Minnesota. The lease commenced on December 16, 2006 at a monthly rent
of $2,650 for the 5 year term of the lease and contains an option to renew
for
an additional term of 1 year at a monthly rent of $2,650. The Company previously
sub-leased from a director of the Company the same space at a monthly rent
of
$750 renewable monthly. The Company incurred rent expense to the
director for the three months ended May 31, 2007 totaling $7,950. The
Company currently owes $14,575 to the director for rent payments due through
May
31, 2007. This amount is included in accounts payable.
Future
payments for fiscal years ending:
|
||||
2008
|
$ |
31,800
|
||
2009
|
31,800
|
|||
2010
|
31,800
|
|||
2011
|
31,800
|
|||
2012
|
25,175
|
|||
$ |
152,375
|
9
Note
7. Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company is exposed to asserted and unasserted claims encountered in the
normal
course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
Note
8. Common Stock Subscriptions Receivable
During
fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, the Company received subscriptions
for
4,811,709 restricted common shares at $0.75 per share. Significant
terms of the subscription agreement are as follows:
|
·
|
Payment
is due in full in 60 months
|
|
·
|
At
24 months, the Company can demand at its option, monthly 1/36
payments on
the subscription agreement.
|
|
·
|
The
Company has the option to charge simple annual interest of up
to
4%.
|
|
·
|
The
Company will provide downside protection of up to 30% of the
stock price
upon conversion.
|
As
of May
31, 2007 and February 28, 2007, the company has outstanding subscription
receivables of $2,795,501 and $2,947,470 respectively. For the three
months ended May 31, 2007, the company collected $151,969 of outstanding
subscription receivables. No interest has been charged on these
subscription agreements. The Company has collected approximately
$255,000 of additional outstanding subscription receivables subsequent
to May
31, 2007.
Note
9. Prior Period Financial Statement
Presentation
For
informational purposes, the following financial statements prepared using
the
accounting principles for a “business development company”, have been
provided:
|
·
|
Statement
of Operations for the three months ended May 31,
2006
|
|
·
|
Statement
of Cash Flows for the three months ended May 31,
2006
|
10
DigitalTown,
Inc.
(formerly
BDC Capital, Inc.)
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
As
a Business Development
Company
|
|||
|
Three
months ended
May
31,
2006
|
|||
Investment
income
|
$ |
2
|
||
|
||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
||||
Professional
fees
|
26,775
|
|||
Administrative
expenses
|
47,019
|
|||
Rent
|
1,125
|
|||
Other
|
2,333
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
1,400
|
|||
Total
Operating expenses
|
78,652
|
|||
Net
investment loss
|
(78,650 | ) | ||
|
||||
Net
change in unrealized appreciation on investment
|
-
|
|||
Net
decrease in net assets resulting from operation
|
$ | (78,650 | ) | |
|
||||
Loss
per common share – basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic and diluted as restated for the 1 for
75 reverse stock split on October 4, 2006
|
5,700,962
|
11
DigitalTown,
Inc.
(formerly
BDC Capital, Inc.)
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
As
a Business Development Company
|
||||
Three
months ended
May
31, 2006
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|||
Net
decrease in net assets resulting from operations as a Business
development company
|
$ | (78,650 | ) | |
Adjustments
to reconcile net assets resulting from operations and net loss
to net cash
used by operating activities:
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
759
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
12,448
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,400
|
|||
Investment
in BDC Partners, Inc.
|
(217,000 | ) | ||
Net
cash used in operating and investing activities
|
(281,043 | ) | ||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||
Net
advance from stockholder
|
5,202
|
|||
Payments
received on stockholder subscription receivable net
of
$20,000 in transaction costs
|
381,063
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
386,265
|
|||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents for the
period
|
105,222
|
|||
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
15,346
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ |
120,568
|
||
|
12
ITEM
2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS
The
following is a discussion of the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the three months ended May 31, 2007, which should be
read in
conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the financial statements
and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This
Form
10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements may
be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “shall,”
“could,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “probable,” “should,”
“continue,” or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those
terms. The forward-looking statements specified in the following
information have been compiled by our management and are considered by
management to be reasonable. Our future operating results, however,
are impossible to predict and no representation, guaranty, or warranty
is to be
inferred from those forward-looking statements.
Withdrawal
as a Business Development Company
The
reader of this management discussion, the related financial statements
and notes
thereto, and other recent Company filings should understand that the portfolio
company (BDC Partners), a company in which the Company invests, and the
Company’s method of accounting upon its withdrawal of its election to be treated
as a business development company (“BDC”) under the investment Company Act of
1940 (“1940 Act”), have materially changed the Company’s financial
reporting.
REASONS
FOR CEASING TO BE A BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
We
determined that many of the regulatory, financial reporting and other
requirements imposed by the 1940 Act were too restrictive and prevented
the
Company from operating in the manner in which it desired. Among these
restrictions are the following:
|
·
|
BDCs
are subject to restrictions in the 1940 Act on the type and amount
of
securities, other than common stock, that they can issue. We
believe that the Company would be better served by greater flexibility
in
our capital structure.
|
|
·
|
The
closely regulated nature of BDCs causes them to be subject to
greater
legal and accounting expenses.
|
The
Company’s Board of Directors agreed with our assessment and determined that it
was no longer feasible for the Company to operate as a BDC. The appropriate
course of action was to withdraw the Company’s election to be regulated as a BDC
by filing a Form N-54C with the SEC. Following the withdrawal of the election,
the Company continues to be a reporting company under the Exchange Act,
but is
managed so that it will not be subject to the provisions of the 1940
Act.
13
EFFECT
ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND TAX STATUS
The
election to withdraw the Company’s election as a Business Development Company
under the 1940 Act has resulted in a significant change in the Company's
required method of accounting. Business Development Company financial
statement presentation and accounting utilizes the fair value method of
accounting used by investment companies, which allows Business Development
Company’s to recognize income and value their investments at market value as
opposed to historical cost.
In
addition, majority-owned subsidiaries are not consolidated and instead,
investments in those subsidiaries are reflected on the balance sheet as
an
investment in and advances to affiliates, at fair value. As an
operating company, the required financial statement presentation and accounting
for securities held by the Company utilize either fair value or historical
cost
methods of accounting, depending on the classification of the investment
and the
Company's intent with respect to the period of time it intends to hold
the
investment, and the Company and its subsidiaries are reflected for financial
accounting purposes as a consolidated entity. The change in
accounting due to the conversion to an operating company from a Business
Development Company is considered a change in accounting principle.
We
do not
believe that the withdrawal of the Company’s election to be treated as a BDC
will have any impact on its federal income tax status, since we never elected
to
be treated as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the
Internal
Revenue Code. (Electing treatment as a regulated investment company under
Subchapter M generally allows a qualified investment company to avoid paying
corporate level federal income tax on income it distributes to its
shareholders.) Instead, we have always been subject to corporate level
federal
income tax on our income (without regard to any distributions we make to
our
shareholders) as a “regular” corporation under Subchapter C of the
Code.
CHANGE
IN
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
Management
has retroactively applied this change in accounting principle in accordance
with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting for Changes and
Error Corrections” for the Company’s balance sheet as of February 28,
2006. The net effect, as of February 28, 2006, of the Company’s
election to withdrawl its business development company status pursuant
to the
Investment Company Act of 1940 was ($797,056) net loss. As a business
development company, the Company’s investment in BDC Partners was not previously
audited prior to February 28, 2006. Management has determined that it
is impractical and not cost effective to retroactively apply this change
in
accounting to the financial statements of BDC Partners prior to February
28,
2006, or to the three interim quarterly financial statements ended May
31, 2006,
August 31, 2006 and November 30, 2006, respectively, as allowed per FAS
154 par.
11. Therefore, the statements of operations and cash flows for the
three months ended May 31, 2006 will not be comparative. However,
these prior period financial statements are included in Note 9 to the Company’s
financial statements, as originally filed for informational
purposes.
Company
Overview
The
Company legally dissolved BDC Partners, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
of
DigitalTown, Inc. and all remaining assets were transferred to and
liabilities assumed by DigitalTown, Inc. Additionally, the Company
formed Tiger Media, a new wholly owned subsidiary of DigitalTown, Inc.
for the
sole purpose of registering all future renewals and purchases of domain
names. For the three months ended May 31, 2007, there was limited
activity in this subsidiary.
14
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2007
For
the three months ended May 31,
2007, the Company incurred a net operating loss of $233,275. The
Company incurred $33,500 of administrative fees for the management of the
Company and total salary and payroll expense of $59,729 of which $11,942
was
deferred salary expense and stock option expense of $7,962. The
Company also incurred $41,507 of professional fees which included $20,000
paid
for April and May retainer fees as part of an agreement signed with Stifel
Nicolaus to act as the Company’s financial advisor and exclusive financing
agent. The Company also made a non-cash stock payment of
$50,063. The company’s overall net loss for the three months ended
May 31, 2007 was $231,701.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The
Company’s cash position at May 31, 2007 was $15,390, an increase of $6,457 from
$8,933 at February 28, 2007. During the three months ended May 31,
2007, net cash used in operating activities was $111,977 which was primarily
due
to losses from operations, offset by increases in accounts payable, a non
cash
stock payment and deferred officer compensation. Net cash used in
investing activities was $22,885 of which $18,929 was used for the renewal
of
existing and the purchase of additional domain names and $3,956 was used
for
fixed asset purchases. The Company entered into an installment
agreement with an online services vendor for the renewal of existing domain
names and assistance in purchasing additional domain names. The total
amount of the non-interest bearing installment agreement was
$214,080. For the three months ended May 31, 2007, the Company made
cash payments of $17,840 on the installment agreement. The balance of $196,240
will be paid in 11 monthly payments of $17,840 for the period of June 2007
to
March 2008 and is included in accounts payable on the balance sheet. Net
cash
provided by financing activities was $141,319 which consisted primarily
of
payments received on stockholder subscription receivables of $151,969 less
$10,650 of advances paid to officer/stockholder.
Our
current monthly operating expenses
are approximately $60,000 per month. We believe our current
cash reserves
and amounts we expect to collect on our outstanding stock subscription
receivable should be sufficient to enable us to operate for the next 12
months. The
Company signed an agreement with Stifel Nicolaus on April 1, 2007 to act
as the
Company’s financial advisor and exclusive financing agent for a 12 month
period. The payment terms of the agreement include a monthly fee of
$10,000 per month (the “Monthly Fee”), a contingent placement fee
(the “Placement Fee”) equal to 7.0% (700 basis points) of the amount of the
equity committed as part of the proposed Financing, plus 5.5% (550 basis
points)
of the subordinated debt committed as part of the proposed Financing, plus
2.0%
(200 basis points) of the senior debt committed as part of the proposed
Financing, provided that the Placement Fee will not be less than
$700,000. In addition, warrants to purchase a number of shares of the
same security of the Company as is issued in the Financing (or a security
with
substantially identical terms) such that the aggregate fair market value,
as
determined in the Financing, of the securities purchasable under the warrants
equals 50% of the Placement Fee (the “Warrants”). The Warrants shall
be earned as of, and shall be issued to Stifel Nicolaus or its designated
affiliates on, the date of the first closing of the Financing and shall
be
exercisable at a price of 100% of the price per share as established in
the
Financing. We anticipate that any additional financing would be
through the sale of our common stock or other equity-based
securities.
15
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
discussion and analysis of
DigitalTown, Inc.’s financial condition and results of operations are based on
our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect
the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses and related disclosure
of
contingent assets and liabilities. Management reviews its estimates on
an
ongoing basis. Management bases its estimates on historical experience
and on
various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments
about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ
from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. While DigitalTown
Inc.’s significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note
1 to
its financial statements, management believes the following accounting
policies
to be critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of
its
financial statements:
Intangible
Assets- Domain Names
The
Company is still in the development stage of its web site portal and
accordingly, all costs, including license renewals, associated with domain
names
expected to be utilized in its web site portal have been
capitalized. Since the Company is still in the development stage of
its web site portal and the ownership of these domain names can be renewed
at a
nominal fee prior to their expiration date, the useful life of the domain
names
are deemed to be indefinite and no amortization will be recorded.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment, and intangibles are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying
amount of
an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated
by
the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by
which the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements:
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS
No.
157"). This standard clarifies the principle that fair value should be
based on
the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset
or
liability. Additionally, it establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
the information used to develop those assumptions. This standard is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November
15,
2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of this statement. We believe
the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
Any
statements contained herein related to future events are forward-looking
statements and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned not to
place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements. BDC Capital, Inc. undertakes
no
obligation to update any such statements to reflect actual events.
16
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
We
are
exposed to market risk for the effect of interest rate
changes. Information relating to quantitative and qualitative
disclosure about market risk is set forth below and in Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
As
of May
31, 2007, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet investments
or hedging
investments.
ITEM
4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
An
evaluation made at the end of the period covered by this report was performed
under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's president,
chief executive officer ("CEO") and the chief financial officer ("CFO")
of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures to insure that the Company records, processes, summarizes
and
reports in a timely and effective manner the information required to be
disclosed in reports filed with or submitted to the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Based on that evaluation and in taking into account the limited
number of employees noted in the following paragraph, the Company's management,
including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company's disclosure controls
and
procedures were effective in timely bringing to their attention material
information related to the Company required to be included in the Company's
periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Since the date of
this
evaluation, there have been no significant changes in the Company's internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those
controls.
Due
to
the limited number of Company employees engaged in the authorization, recording,
processing and reporting of transactions, there is inherently a lack of
segregation of duties. The Company periodically assesses the cost versus
benefit
of adding the resources that would remedy or mitigate this situation, and
currently does not consider the benefits to outweigh the costs of adding
additional staff in light of the limited number of transactions related
to the
Company's operations.
(b)
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.
There
have been no significant changes in internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the fiscal period covered by this report that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
17
PART
II
ITEM
1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
DigitalTown,
Inc. is, from time to time, a party to litigation arising in the normal
course
of its business. The Company believes that none of these actions will
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
We
are
subject to various risks that may materially harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider
the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in
this
filing before deciding to purchase our common stock. If any of these
risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition
or
operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the
trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all
or part
of your investment.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
On
April
20, 2007, the Company issued 22,250 restricted common shares, valued at
$50,063,
to a Minneapolis based high school for their assistance in initially developing
the portal revenue model.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
|
(a)
|
All
information required to be disclosed on a report on Form 8-K
during the
period ended May 31, 2007 has previously been
reported.
|
|
(b)
|
There
have been no material changes to the procedures by which security
holders
may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of
directors.
|
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation, as amended (1)
|
Previously
Filed
|
||
3.2
|
Bylaws
(1)
|
Previously
Filed
|
||
31
|
Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
Included
|
||
32
|
Certifications
under Section 1350
|
Included
|
(1)
Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed as a part of Registration Statement
on Form 10-SB (Commission File No. 000-27225).
18
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
DigitalTown,
INC.
|
|
(formerly
BDC Capitl, Inc.)
|
|
/s/
Richard A.
Pomije
|
|
Richard
A. Pomije, CEO and CFO
|