DigitalTown, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2013 August (Form 10-Q)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
| X | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: August 31, 2013
|__| | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 000-27225
DigitalTown, Inc.
(Name of registrant in its charter)
Minnesota | 41-1427445 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
11974 Portland Avenue, Burnsville, Minnesota | 55337 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
|
|
Registrant's telephone number: (952) 890-2362 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes | X |
| No |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ X ] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large Accelerated Filer [ ]
Accelerated Filer [ ]
Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]
Smaller reporting company [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X] No
There were 29,182,275 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of October 15, 2013.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I |
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | 1-19 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 20-28 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 28 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 28 | ||
|
|
| ||
PART II |
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 30 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 1A | Risk Factors | 30 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 2. | Unregistered sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 30 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 30 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 30 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 5. | Other Information | 30 | ||
|
|
| ||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 30 | ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
iii
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Page |
|
|
Financial Statements: |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 1 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations | 2 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 3 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 4-19 |
DigitalTown, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS | ||||||
| ||||||
|
| August 31, |
| February 28, | ||
|
| 2013 |
| 2013 | ||
|
| (unaudited) |
| (audited) | ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
| ||
Cash |
| $ 6,667 |
| $ 36,006 | ||
Accounts receivable |
| - |
| 6,783 | ||
Current portion of prepaid domain name renewal fees |
| 88,775 |
| 47,656 | ||
Prepaid expenses |
| 1,354 |
| 5,674 | ||
Total current assets |
| 96,796 |
| 96,119 | ||
Prepaid domain name renewal fees, net of current portion |
| - |
| - | ||
Property and equipment, net |
| 12,963 |
| 17,247 | ||
Intangible assets, net |
| 952,165 |
| 1,002,876 | ||
Total assets |
| $ 1,061,924 |
| $ 1,116,242 | ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
| $ 232,698 |
| $ 225,052 | ||
Accounts payable - related party |
| 19,495 |
| 7,445 | ||
Notes payable third party (in default) |
| 150,000 |
| - | ||
Notes payable related party |
| 47,650 |
| 49,000 | ||
Deferred revenue |
| 9,114 |
| 9,114 | ||
Accrued interest |
| 109 |
| 991 | ||
Accrued payroll |
| 1,374 |
| 11,547 | ||
Deferred officer compensation |
| 303,135 |
| 152,309 | ||
Total current liabilities |
| 763,575 |
| 455,458 | ||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000,000 shares authorized, 29,182,275 and 29,160,599 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013, respectively |
| 291,819 |
| 291,602 | ||
Additional paid-in-capital |
| 27,425,099 |
| 26,826,042 | ||
Subscriptions receivable |
| (821,854) |
| (978,854) | ||
Accumulated deficit |
| (26,596,715) |
| (25,478,006) | ||
Total stockholders equity |
| 298,349 |
| 660,784 | ||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
| $ 1,061,924 |
| $ 1,116,242 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
DigitalTown, Inc
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended | ||||
| August 31, |
| August 31, | ||||
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| (unaudited) |
| (unaudited) |
| (unaudited) |
| (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues | $ 253 |
| $ 13,166 |
| $ 562 |
| $ 21,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues | 78,435 |
| 135,883 |
| 159,632 |
| 255,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) | (78,182) |
| (122,717) |
| (159,070) |
| (234,120) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 366,114 |
| 271,891 |
| 934,299 |
| 720,340 |
Loss from operations | (444,296) |
| (394,608) |
| (1,093,369) |
| (954,460) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense | (10,201) |
| - |
| (25,614) |
| - |
Other income | 275 |
| 469 |
| 275 |
| 174,866 |
Total other income (expense) | (9,926) |
| 469 |
| (25,339) |
| 174,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income tax | (454,222) |
| (394,139) |
| (1,118,708) |
| (779,594) |
I Income tax provision | - |
| - |
| - |
| - |
Net loss | $ (454,222) |
| $ (394,139) |
| $ (1,118,708) |
| $ (779,594) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted | $ (0.02) |
| $ (0.01) |
| $ (0.04) |
| $ (0.03) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 29,164,604 |
| 29,147,621 |
| 29,162,602 |
| 29,129,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
DigitalTown, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| Six months ended August 31, | ||
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| (unaudited) |
| (unaudited) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
Net loss | $ (1,118,708) |
| $ (779,594) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
Depreciation | 4,284 |
| 6,425 |
Amortization of website development costs | 54,685 |
| 57,259 |
Interest paid with Warrants | 4,410 |
| - |
Stock-based compensation expense | 560,958 |
| 130,309 |
Stock issued for director fees and executive compensation | 13,655 |
| 17,613 |
Gain from sale of domain name | - |
| (174,300) |
Amortization of debt discount | 20,251 |
| - |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
Accounts receivable | 6,783 |
| 1,793 |
Prepaid domain name renewal fees | (41,119) |
| 82,503 |
Prepaid expense | 4,320 |
| 6,250 |
Accounts payable | 7,401 |
| 102,794 |
Accounts payable related parties | 12,295 |
| - |
Accrued interest | 109 |
| - |
Accrued payroll | (11,164) |
| 418 |
Deferred officer compensation | 150,826 |
| 15,866 |
Deferred revenue | - |
| 14,299 |
Net cash used in operating activities |
(331,015) |
|
(518,365) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment | - |
| (4,526) |
Purchase of intangible asset - website development | (3,486) |
| (1,872) |
Purchases of intangible assets domain names | (488) |
| (22,311) |
Proceeds from sale of domain name | - |
| 175,000 |
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,974) |
| 146,291 |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable third party | 150,000 |
| - |
Payments on notes payable related party | (1,350) |
| - |
Payments received on stockholder subscription receivables | 157,000 |
| 130,000 |
Proceeds from issuance of stock | - |
| 75,000 |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 305,650 |
| 205,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (29,339) |
| (167,074) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 36,006 |
| 221,904 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ 6,667 |
| $ 54,830 |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
Debt discount on notes payable third party | $ 20,251 |
| $ - |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial information has been prepared by DigitalTown, Inc. (the Company) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, it does not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of this financial information have been included. Financial results for the interim period presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year as a whole or any other interim period. This financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2013.
Note 2. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Nature of Business and Going Concern
The Company was founded in 1982 under the laws of the State of Minnesota as Command Small Computer Learning Center, Inc., a computer training company and operated under several different names in the computer hardware and training sector. In 2005, the Company began acquiring domain names. On March 1, 2007, the Company changed its name to DigitalTown, Inc. and began developing a business plan to develop a platform to monetize the domain names. The Companys headquarters are located at 11974 Portland Avenue, Burnsville, MN 55337, and its telephone and facsimile numbers are (952) 890-2362 and (952) 890-7451, respectively. The Company's Internet address is www.digitaltown.com. The Company is traded in the over-the-counter market under the ticker DGTW.
The Companys consolidated financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has a working capital deficit, recurring losses, and negative cash flows from operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
At August 31, 2013, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $26,596,715. Subsequent to August 31, 2013, the Company has received cash proceeds totaling approximately $72,000 from its stock subscription receivable. The Company anticipates that expected future proceeds from its stock subscription receivable, additional financing through the sale of its common stock or other equity-based securities, and additional sales of existing domain names will be sufficient to meet its working capital and capital expenditure needs through at least August 31, 2014. In the event that we are unable to obtain additional capital in the future, we would be forced to further reduce operating expenses and/or cease operations altogether.
Principles of Consolidation
The Company files consolidated financial statements that include its wholly-owned subsidiaries Tiger Media and The School Network, Inc. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
4
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable arose from the sale of and commission earned from display advertising. The Company evaluates collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors including the age of the receivable or a specific customers inability to meet its financial conditions. In these circumstances, the Company records an allowance to reduce the receivable to an amount it deems collectible. The Company has determined that an allowance for doubtful accounts is not necessary as of August 31, 2013.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when the following four criteria have been met:
·
Persuasive evidence that an agreement exists
·
Delivery has occurred
·
The price is fixed and determinable
·
Collectability is reasonably assured
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of display advertising appearing on specific pages of individual spirit sites within DigitalTowns network. Display advertising is sold by the Company directly to local merchants and placed by the Company on specific pages of individual spirit sites targeted by the local merchant. The terms of these sales are for a fixed monthly amount for a period ranging from three months to one year. The Company has also entered into certain third party agreements which allow display advertising to be placed on individual spirit sites within DigitalTowns network. Per these agreements, the Company receives commissions based on a percentage of the per click or per-impression revenue generated by these ads. The Company recognizes these commissions received as revenue.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue is comprised of contractual billings in excess of recognized revenue and payments received in advance of revenue recognition from customers for which services have not been delivered.
Intangible Assets Domain Names/Website Development Costs
Domain name costs are accounted for in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 350-50) guidance pertaining to Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, Website Development Costs. Certain modules and components of the Companys overall website development are ready for their intended use and the Companys resulting websites are currently operational. Accordingly, the annual domain name renewal fees are currently being amortized over one year and the purchase of any new domain names are the only amounts being capitalized. Previously, during the infrastructure development stage of its websites, the Company capitalized the purchase of new domain names and the annual domain name renewal fees. Additionally, since the ownership of each domain name can be renewed for a nominal renewal
5
fee each year prior to their expiration date, the useful lives of the domain names are deemed to be indefinite and no amortization of the capitalized costs for the domain names will be recorded.
Website development costs are accounted for in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 350-40) guidance pertaining to Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, Internal-Use Software which requires that all internal and external costs incurred to develop the internal-use software necessary to operate the websites be capitalized. The guidance further states, amortization should begin when an individual module or component of the overall internal-use software is ready for its intended use. The cost of such module or component will be amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, as determined by the Company, after taking into account the effects of obsolescence, technology, competition and other economic factors. The Company has components of its website development that are operational and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a three year life.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets domain names/website development costs are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets (net of any valuation allowance) and liabilities resulting from temporary differences, net operating loss carry-forwards and tax credit carry-forwards are recorded using an asset-and-liability method. Deferred taxes relating to temporary differences and loss carry-forwards are measured using the tax rate expected to be in effect when they are reversed or are realized. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be ultimately realized. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty of realizing the related future benefits.
The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance. This guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Companys adoption of these provisions specifically related to uncertain tax positions resulted in no cumulative effect adjustment. The Company believes its income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained upon examination and, accordingly, no reserves or related accruals for interest and penalties have been recorded at August 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013. In accordance with the guidance, the Company has adopted a policy under which, if required to be recognized in the future, interest related to the underpayment of income taxes will be classified as a component of interest expense and any related penalties will be classified in operating expenses in the statements of operations. The Company has three open years of tax returns subject to examination.
6
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees, directors and consultants on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting period of the awards. The compensation expense for the Company's stock-based payments is based on estimated fair values at the time of the grant of the portion of stock-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This option pricing model involves a number of assumptions, including the expected lives of stock options, the volatility of the public market price for the Company's common stock and interest rates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
-Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
-Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them
7
more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, Technical Corrections and Improvements in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update) in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08,Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entitys financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Note 3. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, net are as follows:
| August 31, 2013 | February 28, 2013 |
Domain names | $ 860,673 | $ 860,185 |
Website development costs | 366,166 | 362,680 |
Less: accumulated amortization | (274,674) | (219,989) |
Intangible assets, net | $ 952,165 | $ 1,002,876 |
During the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company capitalized $488 in additional domain name purchases. Since the useful life of the domain names is deemed to be indefinite, no amortization has been recorded.
8
During the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company incurred $139,175 of annual domain name renewal fees and recorded them as prepaid domain name renewal fees and expensed $98,056 on a straight line basis, to cost of revenues in the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended August 31, 2013. At August 31, 2013, the Company had $88,775 of prepaid domain name renewal fees which will be amortized over future periods.
During the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company capitalized $3,486 of website development costs. The Company has a total recorded cost of $366,166 at August 31, 2013 and it has determined that $351,458 pertain to a component that is ready for its intended use and have an estimated useful life of three years. During the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company recorded $54,685 of website development amortization expense pertaining to these components to cost of revenues in the Companys consolidated statement of operations.
Note 4. Deferred Officer Compensation
Richard Pomije, Secretary, Treasurer and Chairman and David Pomije, CEO and a Director of the Company, have elected to forego a portion of their salary at various times due to the Companys limited operating funds. These amounts do not accrue interest and are due and payable as funds become available in the future. During the three months ended August 31, 2013, the Company recorded $55,769 of deferred officer compensation and made payments of $6,000 to Richard Pomije and recorded $37,500 of deferred officer compensation for David Pomije. During the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company recorded $125,576 of deferred officer compensation and made payments of $31,000 to Richard Pomije and recorded $56,250 of deferred officer compensation for David Pomije. The total balance at August 31, 2013, and February 28, 2013, were $303,135 and $152,309, respectively.
Note 5. Stockholders Equity
Stock Transactions
On August 15, 2013, the Company issued 21,676 restricted common shares at $0.63 per share, valued at $13,656, to four directors and the Companys contract CFO for payment of director fees, executive compensation and consulting fees. The restricted common shares were valued based at the market price on the grant date.
Stock Warrants
As of August 31, 2013, the Company had 26,668 warrants outstanding with an exercise price of $4.00 and 90,000 with an exercise price of $0.75. The $4.00 warrants expire two years from their date of issuance and the $0.75 warrants expire one year from their date of issuance. The weighted average remaining exercise period as of August 31, 2013 for the $4.00 warrants is 0.21 years and for the $0.75 warrants is 0.63 years.
On April 1, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 stock purchase warrants to a stockholder of the Company to purchase 75,000 shares of the Companys stock for $0.75 per share for a term of one year. The warrants were issued in lieu of interest on an unsecured promissory note for a working capital loan of $150,000, which was due in full on June 30, 2013; but remains outstanding as of August 31, 2013. The Company utilized the following key assumptions in computing the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model:
9
| April 1, |
| 2013 |
Weighted-average volatility | 137% |
Expected dividends | None |
Expected term (in years) | 1.00 |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | 0.14% |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | $0.27 |
The total fair value of the warrants granted by the Company on April 1, 2013 was $20,251, which was recorded as a loan discount and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan. During the three and six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company amortized $6,750 and $20,251 of the discount to interest expense and at August 31, 2013 the discount had a remaining balance of $0.
On June 30, 2013, the Company failed to make its $150,000 payment due on its unsecured promissory note with a stockholder of the Company. Per the terms of the agreement, if the Company is in default for more than five days, it is required to issue an additional 10,000 warrants to the stockholder as a late payment fee. On July 5, 2013, the Company issued 10,000 stock purchase warrants to the stockholder allowing for the purchase of 10,000 shares of the Company's stock at $0.75 per share for a term of one year. The agreement further requires the Company to issue an additional 5,000 warrants to the stockholder each month that the note is in default, up to a maximum of 75,000 total additional warrants. On August 5, 2013 the note remained in default and the Company issued 5,000 stock purchase warrants to the stockholder allowing for the purchase of 5,000 shares of the Company's stock at $0.75 per share for a term of one year. The note remained in default at August 31, 2013. The 15,000 warrants issued as late payment penalties during July and August 2013, were valued at $4,410 and were charged to interest expense during the three months ended August 31, 2013.
On July 16, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 stock purchase warrants to a consultant of the Company to purchase 50,000 shares of the Companys stock for $0.68 per share for a term of ten years. The Company utilized the following key assumptions in computing the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model:
| July 16, |
| 2013 |
Weighted-average volatility | 144% |
Expected dividends | None |
Expected term (in years) | 10.00 |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | 2.55% |
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | $0.67 |
The total fair value of the warrants granted by the Company on July 16, 2013 was $33,310, which was recorded as stock based compensation as the warrants vested immediately.
Other
On December 3, 2010, the Company signed a drawdown equity financing agreement (Drawdown Agreement) with Auctus Private Equity Fund, LLC (Auctus). In connection with the Drawdown Agreement, in April 2011, the Company registered 3,000,000 shares of common stock with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933 and at its discretion, has the right to sell up to the registered shares of common stock to Auctus over a
10
thirty six month period for maximum aggregated consideration of up to $10,000,000, subject to the following terms and conditions.
·
The maximum advance amount available to the Company is limited to the greater of $150,000 or 200% of the average daily volume based on the 10 days preceding the Companys notice requesting a draw.
·
Auctus purchase price per common share will be 94% of the lowest closing volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the Companys common stock during the five trading days immediately following the Companys delivery of notice to Auctus.
·
At its option, the Company can establish a floor price under which Auctus may not sell the shares. The floor price shall be 75% of the closing VWAP for the 10 days prior to the notice requesting a draw. Auctus must cease selling any shares purchased in connection with the Drawdown Agreement if the price falls below the established floor price. The Company, at its discretion, may waive the floor price and allow Auctus to sell its shares below the floor price.
·
In no event can the number of shares owned by Auctus exceed 4.99% of the then outstanding shares of the Companys common stock. As of August 31, 2013, this would translate into maximum ownership by Auctus of approximately 1,456,000 shares of the Companys common stock.
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012, the Company issued 1,000 shares for total proceeds of $2,108 in connection with the drawdown agreement.
During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2013, the Company did not utilize the drawdown agreement.
During the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company did not utilize the drawdown agreement.
Note 6. Stock Options
The Company has one stock option plan called The 2006 Employee Stock and Option Plan. As of August 31, 2013, an aggregate of 7,000,000 shares of common stock may be granted under this plan as determined by the Board of Directors. The stock options may be granted to directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company. Options granted under this plan are non-qualified stock options and have exercise prices and vesting terms established by the Board of Directors at the time of each grant. Vesting terms of the outstanding options range from immediate to four years from the grant date anniversary. The terms of the options range from five to ten years from the date of grant.
For the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company granted stock options allowing for the purchase of up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of common stock. On April 26, 2013, the Company granted 2,000,000 options to an officer/director with a term of 10 years and the options vest as follows: 500,000 on April 16, 2013, 500,000 on April 16, 2014, 500,000 on April 16, 2015 and 500,000 on April 16, 2016. The fair value of the Companys stock options have been estimated using the Black-Scholes pricing model, which requires assumptions as to expected dividends, the options expected life, volatility and risk-free interest rate at the time of the grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting periods in the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
For stock options granted during the six months ended August 31, 2013, we utilized the following key assumptions in computing fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:
11
| April 16, |
|
| 2013 |
|
Weighted-average volatility | 138% |
|
Expected dividends | None |
|
Expected term (in years) | 5.75 |
|
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | 0.71% |
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted | $0.585 |
|
The total fair value of the stock options granted by the Company for the six months ended August 31, 2013 was $1,170,073.
Total stock compensation expense for all option grants was $143,859 and $26,041 for the three months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $527,648 and $130,309 for the six months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense. As of August 31, 2013, the Company has not recorded any tax benefit from this non-cash expense due to the Company having a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The compensation expense impacted the three months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012 basic (loss) per common share by $ (0.005) and $(0.001), respectively, and the six months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012 basic (loss) per common share by $(0.018) and $(0.004), respectively. There remains $743,804 of total unrecognized compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over future periods through April 30, 2016.
The following table summarizes information about the Companys stock options:
| Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contract Life (years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1) | |
Outstanding - February 28, 2013 | 4,410,000 | $ 1.221 | - | - | |
Granted | 2,000,000 | 0.700 | - | - | |
Canceled or expired | (675,000) | 2.080 | - | - | |
Exercised | - | - | - | - | |
Outstanding August 31, 2013 | 5,735,000 | $ 0.938 | 8.34 | - | |
Exercisable at August 31, 2013 | 3,785,000 | $ 1.022 | 7.82 | - |
(1)
The intrinsic value of an option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds its exercise price.
Note 7. Related Party Transactions
Lease with Director/Stockholder
Since December 16, 2006, the Company has leased from Jeffrey L. Mills, a director and stockholder of the Company, approximately 2,650 square feet of space used for offices and operations equipment storage at 11974 Portland Avenue, Burnsville, Minnesota. In November 2011, the Company entered into a three year lease renewal through December 15, 2014 at a monthly rent of $2,650 for the period of December 16, 2011 to December 15, 2012, $2,750 for the period of December 16, 2012 to December 15, 2013 and $2,850 for the period of December 16, 2013 to December 15, 2014 with the option to renew the lease for an additional term of
12
one year at a monthly rent of $3,500. Mr. Mills invoiced the Company $8,250 and $7,950 for the three months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $16,500 and $15,900 for the six months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At August 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013, the Company owed Mr. Mills $19,250 and $5,500, respectively, pertaining to the lease.
Minimum lease payments at August 31, 2013 are as follows: | |||
|
| ||
FY 2014 | $ 16,800 | ||
FY 2015 | 25,650 | ||
| $ 42,450 | ||
|
|
Accounts Payable
The Company had Accounts payable balances due to related parties of $19,495 at August 31, 2013, which consisted of $245 due to Richard Pomije and $19,250 due to Jeff Mills. The balance at February 28, 2013 was $7,445 which consisted of $1,945 due to Richard Pomije and $5,500 due to Jeff Mills.
Notes Payable Related Party
On March 25, 2008, the Company signed an unsecured promissory note with Jeff Mills, a director and stockholder of the Company, for a working capital loan of $145,000, due on demand at an annual interest rate of 6.5%. In August 2010, the annual interest rate increased to 7.5%. The outstanding balance of the loan at August 31, 2013 was $48,235. For the three months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company made principal payments of $487 and $0, respectively, and interest expense incurred on this loan was $934 and $0, respectively. For the six months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company made principal payments of $1,350 and $0, respectively, and interest expense incurred on this loan was $1,838 and $0, respectively. Accrued interest at August 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013 was $109 and $991, respectively.
Note 8. Notes Payable
Notes Payable Third Party
On April 1, 2013, the Company signed an unsecured promissory note with a stockholder of the Company, for a non interest bearing working capital loan of $150,000, due in full on June 30, 2013. In lieu of interest on the loan, the Company issued the stockholder 75,000 warrants to purchase the Companys stock at $0.75 per share. The warrants were issued on March 27, 2013 and have a term of one year. If the Company defaults in payment by more than five days, the stockholder receives an additional 10,000 warrants under the same terms as the original warrants. Each additional month that the Company is in default, the stockholder receives an additional 5,000 warrants under the same terms as the original warrants, up to a maximum of 75,000 additional warrants. The Company recorded a discount of $20,251 on April 1, 2013 and amortized $20,251 of the discount and recorded it as interest expense on its consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended August 31, 2013. The discount balance at August 31, 2013 was $0. The Company evaluated the warrants for derivative features noting none.
On June 30, 2013, the Company failed to make its $150,000 payment due on its unsecured promissory note with a stockholder of the Company. Per the terms of the agreement, if the Company is in default for more than five days, it is required to issue an additional 10,000 warrants to the stockholder as a late payment fee. On July 5, 2013, the Company issued 10,000 stock purchase warrants to the stockholder allowing for the purchase of
13
10,000 shares of the Company's stock at $0.75 per share for a term of one year. The agreement further requires the Company to issue an additional 5,000 warrants to the stockholder each month that the note is in default, up to a maximum of 75,000 total additional warrants. On August 5, 2013 the note remained in default and the Company issued 5,000 stock purchase warrants to the stockholder allowing for the purchase of 5,000 shares of the Company's stock at $0.75 per share for a term of one year. The 15,000 warrants issued as late payment penalties during July and August 2013, were valued at $4,410 and were charged to interest expense during the three months ended August 31, 2013.
As of October 15, 2013, the Company had not made the payment and remained in default on the note.
Notes Payable - Related Party
On March 25, 2008, the Company signed an unsecured promissory note with Jeff Mills, a director and stockholder of the Company, for a working capital loan of $145,000, due on demand at an annual interest rate of 6.5%. In August 2010, the annual interest rate increased to 7.5%. The outstanding balance of the loan at August 31, 2013 was $48,235. For the three months ended August 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company made principal payments of $487 and $0, respectively, and interest expense incurred on this loan was $934 and $0, respectively. For the six months ended August 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company made principal payments of $1,350 and $0, respectively, and interest expense incurred on this loan was $1,838 and $0, respectively. Accrued interest at August 31, 2013, and February 28, 2013 was $109 and $991, respectively.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is exposed to asserted and un-asserted claims encountered in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
On August 22, 2011, the Company entered into a nine month agreement with Enable Consulting, LLC (Enable) to complete the design and development of the Companys Sales Center Application. The Company committed up to $66,000 for the development and maintenance support of this software application through May 31, 2012. On June 27, 2012, the Company signed an amendment to its existing contract with Enable to establish payment terms for the remaining balance due Enable of $36,000 and prioritize the remaining unresolved maintenance items which Enable was to have completed by August 15, 2012. The Company paid $13,500 on June 29, 2012. As of August 31, 2013, the maintenance items remain unresolved and the Company has a balance due Enable of $22,500, which is included in accounts payable.
On December 8, 2010, the Company entered into a five year strategic partnership agreement with the National Interscholastic Athletic Administrators Association (NIAAA). The NIAAA and DigitalTown will work together to establish a national, standardized system for recording schedules, scores, rosters and statistics for interscholastic sports teams and individual students. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has committed to pay the expenses related to this strategic partnership; however any expenses in excess of $5,000 must be preapproved by the Company. The Company has committed to deposit $50,000 for such expenses for the first fiscal year of the contract which the Company has paid as of February 29, 2012. In addition, as of August 31, 2013, the Company has paid $20,000 of the $50,000 due for the second fiscal year of the contract and the balance due of $30,000 is included in accounts payable. In addition, the Company has committed to donate 25% of the annual net sponsorship revenue in the scheduling and stats areas of its websites, with a total annual donation cap of $3,000,000, to yet to be named program funds that promote youth activities and the NIAAA. Lastly, the Company has committed to a minimal revenue share of $100,000 per year with the future launch of
14
its beta 3 software. As of August 31, 2013, the Company has not yet launched its beta 3 software nor has it generated any net sponsorship revenue.
Note 10. Common Stock Subscriptions Receivable
As of August 31, 2013, the Company has the following stock subscription agreements outstanding all of which are due from a related party:
2005 Agreements
Material terms of the subscription agreements received by the Company on December 30, 2005 for 4,733,333 restricted common shares at $0.75 per share (total value of $3,550,000) are as follows:
·
Payment is due in full in 60 months.
·
At 24 months, the Company can demand at its option, monthly 1/36 payments on the subscription agreement.
·
The Company has the option to charge simple annual interest of up to 4%.
·
The Company will provide downside protection of up to 30% of the stock price upon conversion.
The outstanding balance owed on the 2005 subscription agreements at August 31, 2013 is $0.
2007 Agreements
On October 5, 2007, the Company received subscriptions for 1,300,000 restricted common shares at $2.50 per share (total value of $3,250,000). Significant terms of the original subscription agreement are as follows:
·
The price per share of $2.50 was based on the closing price on October 4, 2007.
·
At 24 months, 1/36 payments are due monthly.
·
The Company, at its option, may call up to 1/12 of the gross receivable per month if the preceding 30 day average trading price is at or above $7.00 a share with minimum trading volume of 5,000 shares per day.
·
If the purchaser sells these common shares, the purchaser shall be entitled to an amount equal to 200% of the original purchase price of each share and the Company shall be entitled to 50% of any additional net sales proceeds from the stock sale.
On February 25, 2010, due to the economic downturn and the market value decline of the Companys stock, which was trading below $2.50 per share, the Company amended the pricing terms of the subscription agreements received by the Company on October 5, 2007. The amendment changed the following significant terms of the subscription agreement:
The parties agree that the Initial Pricing terms in the Confidential Binding Term Sheet dated October 5, 2007 of the Agreement will be amended to state as follows:
1.
The Subscriber offers to purchase shares of the Company for $0.75 per share. After the price adjustment, the revised total value of this subscription agreement is $975,000.
The following other provisions of the Initial Pricing and Final Pricing terms in the Confidential Binding Term Sheet dated October 5, 2007 of the Agreement will be deleted, and are not enforceable by either party:
15
·
Beginning October 5, 2009, and 1/36 payments are due each month thereafter on the 5th of every month.
·
The Company at its option may call up to 1/12 of the (gross) receivable note per month if the preceding 30 day average trading price is at or above $7.00 a share. Minimum trading volume must be 5,000 shares a day.
·
As total consideration for the purchase and sale of the Companys stock, purchaser shall ultimately pay to the Company the following amount (the Purchase Price):
A.
Purchaser shall first be entitled to an amount equal to 200% of the face amount of each share.
B.
After the purchaser receives the amount in A above, the Company shall be entitled to 50% of any additional net sales proceeds of the stock. Net sales proceeds shall mean the gross proceeds received from the sale of the stock, less reasonable brokerage commissions.
C.
Final adjusted net sales proceeds will be wired to the Company within 7 days from the final settlement of the sale of stock sold.
The outstanding balance owed on the revised 2007 subscription agreements at August 31, 2013 is $521,854.
2010 Agreement
Material terms of the subscription agreement received by the Company on June 22, 2010, for 400,000 restricted common shares at $0.75 per share (total value of $300,000) are as follows:
·
Payment is due in full in 60 months.
·
At 24 months, the Company can demand at its option, monthly 1/36 payments on the subscription agreement.
·
The Company has the option to charge simple annual interest of up to 4%.
·
The Company will provide downside protection of up to 30% of the stock price upon conversion.
The outstanding balance owed on the 2010 subscription agreement at August 31, 2013 is $300,000.
Summary
For the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company received stock subscription payments of $157,000 and as of August 31, 2013, the Company had related party stock subscriptions receivable aggregating $821,854 for the 2007 and 2010 agreements.
The following tables summarize information about the stock subscription receivable:
Receivable balance at February 29, 2008 | $ 5,030,795 |
Cash collected | (523,832) |
Receivable balance at February 28, 2009 | 4,506,963 |
Cash collected | (337,500) |
2007 Subscription agreement pricing revised (1) | (2,275,000) |
Receivable balance at February 28, 2010 | 1,894,463 |
New subscription agreement (2) | 300,000 |
Cash collected | (771,809) |
Receivable balance at February 28, 2011 | 1,422,654 |
Cash collected | (123,000) |
Receivable balance at February 29, 2012 | 1,299,654 |
Cash collected | (320,800) |
16
Receivable balance at February 28, 2013 | 978,854 |
Cash collected | (68,000) |
Receivable balance at May 31, 2013 | 910,854 |
Cash Collected | (89,000) |
Receivable balance at August 31, 2013 | $ 821,854 |
|
|
Summary of outstanding subscriptions: |
|
2005 subscriptions | $ - |
2007 subscriptions | 521,854 |
2010 subscriptions | 300,000 |
| $ 821,854 |
|
|
(1)
Amendment to the terms of the subscription agreements received by the Company on October 5, 2007 for 1,300,000 restricted common shares reducing the price paid per share from $2.50 to $0.75.
(2)
New subscription agreement received on June 22, 2010.
The Company did not exercise its rights, per the 2005 subscription agreements, to demand monthly 1/36 payments or to charge up to 4% interest on the subscription amounts outstanding and they did not provide any downside protection to the subscribers. The downside protection in the terms for the 2005 subscription agreements required the Company to reimburse the subscription holder up to 30% of the $.75 purchase price, or $0.225, if the market price of the stock was below $0.75 when converted. The protection could have been provided in additional shares if necessary. The subscription agreements did not define the term when converted. The Company took the position that if at the time that a purchaser made a payment in full for the shares under a 2005 subscription agreement and the closing price of the shares of the Companys stock is less than $0.75, the shareholder would have been entitled to up to 30% additional shares, depending on the trading share price. As of April 2012, the 2005 subscription agreements were paid for in their entirety and any potential downside protection ceased.
Note 11. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The Company computes earnings per share using two different methods, basic and diluted, and presents per share data for all periods in which statements of operations are presented. Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding.
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in calculating basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and six month periods ended August 31, 2013 and 2012:
17
| Three months ended | ||
| August 31, | ||
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
Basic earnings (loss) per share calculation: |
|
|
|
Net loss to common shareholders | $ (454,222) |
| $ (349,139) |
Weighted average of common shares outstanding | 29,164,604 |
| 29,147,621, |
Basic net loss per share | $ (0.02) |
| $ (0.01) |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation: |
|
|
|
Net loss to common shareholders | $ (454,222) |
| $ (394,139) |
Weighted average of common shares outstanding | 29,164,604 |
| 29,147,621 |
Stock options (1) | - |
| - |
Warrants (2) | - |
| - |
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 29,164,604 |
| 29,147,621 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net loss per share | $ (0.02) |
| $ (0.01) |
| |||
| Six months ended | ||
| August 31, | ||
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
Basic earnings (loss) per share calculation: |
|
|
|
Net loss to common shareholders | $ (1,118,708) |
| $ (779,594) |
Weighted average of common shares outstanding | 29,162,602 |
| 29,129,805 |
Basic net loss per share | $ (0.04) |
| $ (0.03) |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation: |
|
|
|
Net loss to common shareholders | $ (1,118,708) |
| $ (779,594) |
Weighted average of common shares outstanding | 29,162,602 |
| 29,129,805 |
Stock options (1) | - |
| - |
Warrants (2) | - |
| - |
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 29,162,602 |
| 29,129,805 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted net loss per share | $ (0.04) |
| $ (0.03) |
(1) | At August 31, 2013 and 2012, there were outstanding stock options equivalent of 5,735,000 and 4,570,000 common shares, respectively. The stock options are anti-dilutive at August 31, 2013 and 2012 and therefore have been excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per share. |
|
|
(2) | At August 31, 2013 and 2012, there were outstanding warrants equivalent to 116,668 and 1,092,410 common shares, respectively. The warrants are anti-dilutive at August 31, 2013 and 2012 and therefore have been excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per share. |
18
Note 12. Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
| Six months ended | |
| August 31, | |
| 2013 | 2012 |
Non-cash flow information: |
|
|
Cash paid for interest | $ 1,838 | - |
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
Debt discount on loan stockholder | $ 20,251 | - |
|
|
|
Note 13. Subsequent Events
The Company has collected approximately $72,000 of its stock subscription receivables during the period from September 1, 2013 to October 15, 2013.
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of the financial condition of the Company as of August 31, 2013, and its results of operations for the three and six months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, which should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2013.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2013, contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as may, shall, could, expect, estimate, anticipate, predict, probable, should, continue, or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms. The forward-looking statements specified in the following information have been compiled by our management and are considered by management to be reasonable. Our future operating results, however, are impossible to predict and no representation, guaranty, or warranty is to be inferred from those forward-looking statements.
Company Overview
DigitalTown owns and operates a nationwide social networking site of hyper-local on-line communities built around their domain names and the schools and communities they represent.
In March 2013, DigitalTown filed a trademark application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for the service mark Americas Prodigy. The Company is the holder of Americasprodigy.com and various other prodigy related domain names. The application lists its goods and services as entertainment services, namely, conducting contests.
In February 2013, public registration began for TrustedWebmail, DigitalTowns webmail platform. TrustedWebmail features advanced monitoring controls for schools, athletic directors, youth leagues and business and will provide an easy method for monitoring emails sent and received. DigitalTown plans to launch a second tool called Trusted Cell Phone, which is a predator-averse parental/coach/teacher monitoring application which allows you to monitor all texts (SMS or MMS), phone calls, or images into or out of any android based cellular phone under your control.
On July 31, 2012, DigitalTown and the National Interscholastic Athletic Administrators Association ("NIAAA") jointly announced that TrustedWebmail will be the official recommended email provider of the NIAAA for athletic administrators, coaches and athletes nationwide.
On May 23, 2012, DigitalTown and The Active Network, Inc. (Active) completed a Handoff Agreement of the technology assets supporting DigitalTowns school spirit websites and its related social networking sites. The Handoff Agreement indicates that both DigitalTown and Active agreed to mutually terminate the Strategic Alliance Agreement, initially entered between the parties on September 29, 2009, and subsequently re-entered between the parties on September 30, 2011.
On May 14, 2012, DigitalTown Limited (DTL) was incorporated under Chapter 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong. DTL is 100% owned by TSN.
20
On May 3, 2012, DigitalTown created a new, wholly-owned subsidiary, The School Network, Inc. (TSN), under the laws of the State of Nevada.
On April 4, 2012, the Company executed a Domain Sale Agreement under which it agreed to sell one of the domain names the Company currently owns. The Company received $175,000 cash in consideration of the transfer of the domain name.
On February 6, 2012, DigitalTown announced that its ad revenue sharing program for its hyper-local, high school spirit websites would become effective beginning March 1, 2012. For the remainder of 2012 and the entire 2012/13 school year, DigitalTown has committed to sharing the revenue generated on up to 55% of its ad space with the local schools and the NIAAA.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2013 and 2012
During the three months ended August 31, 2013, the Company recorded revenues of $253 and cost of revenues of $78,435 for a negative gross profit of $(78,182) compared to revenues of $13,166 and cost of revenues of $135,883 for a negative gross profit of $(122,717), for the same period in 2012. For the three months ended August 31, 2013, revenue mainly consisted of commissions generated from advertising on our websites of $253. For the comparable period, revenue mainly consisted of commissions generated from advertising on our websites of $4,995 and the direct sale of display advertising of $8,171. Cost of revenue consisted of amortization of prepaid annual domain name renewal fees of $49,008 for 2013 compared to $47,397 for 2012, server/bandwidth expense of $2 for 2013 and $11,185 for 2012, amortization of website development fees were $27,342 for 2013 and $27,971 for 2012 and direct sales expense of $2,043 for 2013 compared to $49,331 for 2012.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the most current three months increased by $94,223 to $366,114 compared to a year ago. Stock compensation expense, included in selling, general and administration expenses, was $177,169 for the three months ended August 31, 2013, compared to $26,041 for the three months ended August 31, 2012, an increase of $151,128, compared to a year ago. Excluding non-cash stock compensation expense for the two comparable periods, selling, general, and administrative expenses were $188,945 for the three months ended August 31, 2013, compared to $245,850 for the three months ended August 31, 2012. The decrease of $56,905 was primarily due to a decrease in payroll expense of $20,060 and a $17,068 decrease in legal and professional fees. The Companys overall net loss for the current three months increased by $60,083 to $454,222.
SIX MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2013 and 2012
During the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company recorded revenues of $562 and cost of revenues of $159,632 for a negative gross profit of $(159,070) compared to revenues of $21,139 and cost of revenues of $255,259 for a negative gross profit of $(234,120), for the same period in 2012. For the six months ended August 31, 2013, revenue mainly consisted of commissions generated from advertising on our websites of $553 For the comparable period, revenue mainly consisted of commissions generated from advertising on our websites of $8,806 and the direct sale of display advertising of $12,333. Cost of revenue consisted of amortization of prepaid annual domain name renewal fees of $98,055 for 2013 compared to $93,687 for 2012, server/bandwidth expense of $1,396 for 2013 and $20,652 for 2012, amortization of website development fees were $54,685 for 2013 and $57,260 for 2012 and direct sales expense of $5,497 for 2013 compared to $83,660 for 2012.
21
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the most current six months increased by $213,959 to $934,299 compared to a year ago. Stock compensation expense, included in selling, general and administration expenses, was $560,957 for the six months ended August 31, 2013, compared to $130,309 for the six months ended August 31, 2012, an increase of $430,648, compared to a year ago. Excluding non-cash stock compensation expense for the two comparable periods, selling, general, and administrative expenses were $373,342 for the six months ended August 31, 2013, compared to $590,031 for the six months ended August 31, 2012. The decrease of $216,689 was primarily due to a decrease in legal and professional fees of $125,029, a decrease in payroll expense of $52,636 and a $12,464 decrease in travel and entertainment expense. The Companys overall net loss for the current three months increased by $339,114 to $1,118,708.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
SIX MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2013
The Companys cash position at August 31, 2013, was $6,667, a decrease of $29,339 from $36,006 at February 28, 2013. Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, was $331,015 and $518,365, respectively. When comparing the two periods, the decrease in cash used in operating activities of $187,350 is mainly due to an increase of $134,960 in deferred officer compensation.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended August 31, 2013 was $3,974 of which $3,486 was used for additional website development fees and $488 for the purchase of additional domain names as compared to net cash provided of $146,291 for the six months ended August 31, 2012, of which $175,000 was proceeds from the sale of a domain name offset by $4,526 used for the purchase of additional property and equipment, $22,311 used for the purchase of additional domain names and $1,872 used for additional website development cost.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended August 31, 2013 was $305,650 which consisted of proceeds from loan - director/stockholder of $150,000, payments received on stockholder subscription receivables of $157,000 offset by $1,350 of principal payments on loan - director/stockholder. For the comparable period ended August 31, 2012, the Company had net cash provided by financing activities of $205,000 which consisted of proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $75,000 and payments received on stockholder subscription receivables of $130,000.
Monthly cash operating expenses for the six months ended August 31, 2013, were approximately $77,000 per month. Based on current projections, the Companys monthly cash operating expenses going forward should remain at approximately $77,000 per month, which includes the remaining annual cost to renew the existing domain names of approximately $55,000. In addition to the normal monthly operating expenses, the Companys committed cash requirements for the twelve months ending February 28, 2014, include a $150,000 payment due June 30, 2013 on a promissory note with a stockholder of the Company, the balance due of $30,000 for expenses pertaining to the Companys Strategic Partnership Agreement with the NIAAA, $22,500 pertaining to the Company's software development maintenance agreement and a promissory note with Jeff Mills, a director and stockholder, with a balance due of $47,650 as of August 31, 2013 and is payable on demand. From September 1, 2013 to October 15, 2013, the Company has received cash proceeds of approximately $72,000 from stock subscription receivables.
The Company failed to make the payment due on June 30, 2013 on the promissory note with a stockholder. Per the terms of the agreement, the Company was in default for more than five days and issued an additional 10,000 warrants to the stockholder. The warrants allow the stockholder to purchase the Company's stock at $0.75 per share and have a term of one year. The agreement further requires the Company to issue an additional 5,000
22
warrants to the stockholder each month that the note is in default, up to a maximum of 75,000 total additional warrants. On August 5, 2013 the note remained in default and the Company issued 5,000 stock purchase warrants to the stockholder allowing for the purchase of 5,000 shares of the Company's stock at $0.75 per share for a term of one year. As of October 15, 2013, the Company had not made the payment and remained in default on the note.
As of August 31, 2013, the Company has the following stock subscription agreements outstanding:
2005 Agreements
Material terms of the subscription agreements received by the Company on December 30, 2005 for 4,733,333 restricted common shares at $0.75 per share (total value of $3,550,000) are as follows:
·
Payment is due in full in 60 months.
·
At 24 months, the Company can demand at its option, monthly 1/36 payments on the subscription agreement.
·
The Company has the option to charge simple annual interest of up to 4%.
·
The Company will provide downside protection of up to 30% of the stock price upon conversion.
The outstanding balance owed on the 2005 subscription agreements at August 31, 2013 is $0.
2007 Agreements
On October 5, 2007, the Company received subscriptions for 1,300,000 restricted common shares at $2.50 per share (total value of $3,250,000). Significant terms of the original subscription agreement are as follows:
·
The price per share of $2.50 was based on the closing price on October 4, 2007.
·
At 24 months, 1/36 payments are due monthly.
·
The Company, at its option, may call up to 1/12 of the gross receivable per month if the preceding 30 day average trading price is at or above $7.00 a share with minimum trading volume of 5,000 shares per day.
·
If the purchaser sells these common shares, the purchaser shall be entitled to an amount equal to 200% of the original purchase price of each share and the Company shall be entitled to 50% of any additional net sales proceeds from the stock sale.
On February 25, 2010, due to the economic downturn and the market value decline of the Companys stock, which was trading below $2.50 per share, the Company amended the pricing terms of the subscription agreements received by the Company on October 5, 2007. The amendment changed the following significant terms of the subscription agreement:
The parties agree that the Initial Pricing terms in the Confidential Binding Term Sheet dated October 5, 2007 of the Agreement will be amended to state as follows:
1.
The Subscriber offers to purchase shares of the Company for $0.75 per share. After the price adjustment, the revised total value of this subscription agreement is $975,000.
The following other provisions of the Initial Pricing and Final Pricing terms in the Confidential Binding Term Sheet dated October 5, 2007 of the Agreement will be deleted, and are not enforceable by either party:
23
·
Beginning October 5, 2009, and 1/36 payments are due each month thereafter on the 5th of every month.
·
The Company at its option may call up to 1/12 of the (gross) receivable note per month if the preceding 30 day average trading price is at or above $7.00 a share. Minimum trading volume must be 5,000 shares a day.
·
As total consideration for the purchase and sale of the Companys stock, purchaser shall ultimately pay to the Company the following amount (the Purchase Price):
D.
Purchaser shall first be entitled to an amount equal to 200% of the face amount of each share.
E.
After the purchaser receives the amount in A above, the Company shall be entitled to 50% of any additional net sales proceeds of the stock. Net sales proceeds shall mean the gross proceeds received from the sale of the stock, less reasonable brokerage commissions.
F.
Final adjusted net sales proceeds will be wired to the Company within 7 days from the final settlement of the sale of stock sold.
The outstanding balance owed on the revised 2007 subscription agreements at August 31, 2013 is $521,854.
2010 Agreement
Material terms of the subscription agreement received by the Company on June 22, 2010, for 400,000 restricted common shares at $0.75 per share (total value of $300,000) are as follows:
·
Payment is due in full in 60 months.
·
At 24 months, the Company can demand at its option, monthly 1/36 payments on the subscription agreement.
·
The Company has the option to charge simple annual interest of up to 4%.
·
The Company will provide downside protection of up to 30% of the stock price upon conversion.
The outstanding balance owed on the 2010 subscription agreement at August 31, 2013 is $300,000.
Summary
For the six months ended August 31, 2013, the Company received stock subscription payments of $157,000 and as of August 31, 2013, the Company had related party stock subscriptions receivable aggregating $821,854 for the 2007 and 2010 agreements.
The following table summarizes the stock subscription receivable, by quarter, at August 31, 2013:
Quarter Ended | Total Balance Due | Total Amount Collected | New Subscription Agreements |
| Participatory Rights in the Proceeds of the Resales Collected | Amount of Downside Protection Provided |
February 29, 2012 | 1,299,654 | - |
|
|
| - |
May 31, 2012 | 1,249,654 | 50,000 |
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2012 | 1,169,654 | 80,000 |
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2012 | 1,099,154 | 70,500 |
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2013 | 978,854 | 120,300 |
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2013 | 910,854 | 68,000 |
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2013 | 821,854 | 89,000 |
|
|
|
|
The Company did not exercise its rights, per the 2005 subscription agreements, to demand monthly 1/36 payments or to charge up to 4% interest on the subscription amounts outstanding and they did not provide any
24
downside protection to the subscribers. The downside protection in the terms for the 2005 subscription agreements required the Company to reimburse the subscription holder up to 30% of the $0.75 purchase price, or $0.225, if the market price of the stock was below $0.75 when converted. The protection could have been provided in additional shares if necessary. The subscription agreements did not define the term when converted. The Company took the position that if at the time that a purchaser made a payment in full for the shares under a 2005 subscription agreement and the closing price of the shares of the Companys stock is less than $0.75, the shareholder would have been entitled to up to 30% additional shares, depending on the trading share price. As of April 2012, the 2005 subscription agreements were paid for in their entirety and any potential downside protection ceased.
In summary, we believe our current cash reserves, the amounts we expect to collect on our outstanding stock subscription receivables, future proceeds from the issuance of our common stock and proceeds from the sale of current domain names should be sufficient to enable us to operate for the next 12 months. In the event that we are unable to collect our stock subscription receivables as needed or raise additional capital through the sale of our common stock or sell additional domain names on acceptable terms, we would be forced to reduce operating expenses and/or cease operations altogether.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of DigitalTown, Inc.s financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management reviews its estimates on an ongoing basis. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. While DigitalTown Inc.s significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to its financial statements, management believes the following accounting policies to be critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial statements:
Intangible Assets Domain Names/Website Development Costs
Domain name costs are accounted for in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 350-50) guidance pertaining to Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, Website Development Costs. Certain modules and components of the Companys overall website development are ready for their intended use and the Companys resulting websites are currently operational. Accordingly, the annual domain name renewal fees are currently being amortized over one year and the purchase of any new domain names are capitalized. Previously, during the infrastructure development stage of its websites, the Company capitalized the purchase of new domain names and the annual domain name renewal fees. Since the ownership of each domain name can be renewed for a nominal renewal fee each year prior to their expiration date, the useful lives of the domain names are deemed to be indefinite and no amortization of the capitalized costs for the domain names will be recorded.
Website development costs are accounted for in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 350-40) guidance pertaining to Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, Internal-Use Software which requires that all internal and external costs incurred to develop the internal-use software necessary to operate the websites be capitalized. The guidance further states, amortization should begin
25
when an individual module or component of the overall internal-use software is ready for its intended use. The cost of such module or component will be amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, as determined by the Company, after taking into account the effects of obsolescence, technology, competition and other economic factors. The Company has components of its website development that are operational and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a three year life.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets domain names/website development costs are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting period of the awards. The compensation expense for the Company's stock-based payments is based on estimated fair values at the time of the grant of the portion of stock-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This option pricing model involves a number of assumptions, including the expected lives of stock options, the volatility of the public market price for the Company's common stock and interest rates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
-Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
-Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of
26
accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, Technical Corrections and Improvements in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update) in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08,Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entitys financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
27
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Any statements contained herein related to future events are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. DigitalTown, Inc. undertakes no obligation to update any such statements to reflect actual events.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The Company has not entered into, and does not expect to enter into, financial instruments for trading or hedging purposes. The Company does not currently anticipate entering into interest rate swap and/or similar instruments. Our primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is to changes in interest rates, which would only impact interest income earned on such instruments. As of August 31, 2013, the Company does not have any material currency exchange or interest rate risk exposure.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness, as of August 31, 2013, of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13(a)-13(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The purpose of this evaluation was to determine whether as of the evaluation date our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on their evaluation, our management has concluded, as previously discussed in Item 9A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2013, that material weaknesses continue to exist in our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2013, and as a result our disclosures controls and procedures were not effective. Notwithstanding the material weaknesses that continue to exist as of August 31, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.
Management continues to evaluate the Companys internal controls over financial reporting to insure that the design and implementation of corrective procedures are adequate to remediate the previously identified material weaknesses from our Form 10-K at February 28, 2013. Due to the small number of employees dealing with general administrative and financial matters and the expenses associated with increases to remediate the disclosure controls and procedures that have been identified, the Company continued to operate without changes to its internal controls over financial reporting for the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q while continuing to evaluate and improve to remediate the material weaknesses at an appropriate cost benefit basis.
28
During the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2013, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
29
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
DigitalTown, Inc. is, from time to time, a party to litigation arising in the normal course of its business. The Company believes that none of these actions will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The most significant risk factors applicable to the Company are described in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2013. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On August 15, 2013, the Company issued 21,676 restricted common shares at $0.63 per share, valued at $13,656, to four directors and the Companys contract CFO for payment of director fees, executive compensation and consulting fees. The restricted common shares were valued based at the market price on the grant date.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
(a)
All information required to be disclosed on a report on Form 8-K during the period ended August 31, 2013, has previously been reported.
(b)
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the registrants board of directors.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.1 |
| Articles of Incorporation, as amended * | Previously Filed |
3.2 |
| Bylaws* | Previously Filed |
31 |
| Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | Included |
32 |
| Certifications under Section 1350 | Included |
101.INS** |
| XBRL Instance | Included |
101.SCH** |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | Included |
101.CAL** |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation | Included |
101.DEF** |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition | Included |
30
101.LAB** |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels | Included |
101.PRE** |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation | Included |
*Incorporated by reference to exhibit filed as a part of Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (Commission File No. 000-27225).
** XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DigitalTown, Inc.
Dated: October 15, 2013
/s/ David R. Pomije_____________________
David R. Pomije
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
/s/ Paul R. Gramstad_____________________
Paul R. Gramstad
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer
32