DLH Holdings Corp. - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-18492
TEAMSTAFF, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey | 22-1899798 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1 Executive Drive, Suite 130 | ||
Somerset, New Jersey | 08873 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(866) 952-1647
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller Reporting Company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 5,641,913 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, were
outstanding as of May 9, 2011.
TEAMSTAFF, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
Table of Contents
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
Table of Contents
Page No. | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.3 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.4 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 |
2
Table of Contents
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1:
TEAMSTAFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
(unaudited) | ||||||||
March 31, | September 30, | |||||||
ASSETS | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,259 | $ | 1,187 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $0 as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 |
11,955 | 11,324 | ||||||
Prepaid workers compensation |
547 | 512 | ||||||
Other current assets |
246 | 344 | ||||||
Total current assets |
14,007 | 13,367 | ||||||
EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS: |
||||||||
Furniture and equipment |
177 | 2,259 | ||||||
Computer equipment |
102 | 215 | ||||||
Computer software |
612 | 960 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
23 | 12 | ||||||
914 | 3,446 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(643 | ) | (3,112 | ) | ||||
Equipment and improvements, net |
271 | 334 | ||||||
TRADENAMES |
2,583 | 2,583 | ||||||
GOODWILL |
8,595 | 8,595 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
373 | 360 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 25,829 | $ | 25,239 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TEAMSTAFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PAR VALUE OF SHARES)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PAR VALUE OF SHARES)
(unaudited) | ||||||||
March 31, | September 30, | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Loan payable |
$ | 1,474 | $ | 362 | ||||
Notes payable |
1,500 | 1,500 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
13 | 18 | ||||||
Accrued payroll |
10,569 | 10,910 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
1,627 | 1,887 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
2,300 | 1,872 | ||||||
Liabilities from discontinued operation |
238 | 289 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
17,721 | 16,838 | ||||||
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, net of current portion |
4 | 8 | ||||||
OTHER LONG TERM LIABILITY |
2 | 5 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
17,727 | 16,851 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.10 par value; authorized 5,000 shares;
none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 40,000 shares;
issued 5,642 at March 31,2011 and 5,105 at
September 30, 2010, outstanding 5,640 at
March 31, 2011 and 5,103 at September 30, 2010 |
6 | 5 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
69,736 | 69,503 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(61,616 | ) | (61,096 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, 2 shares at cost at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 |
(24 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
8,102 | 8,388 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 25,829 | $ | 25,239 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TEAMSTAFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
REVENUES |
$ | 10,444 | $ | 9,795 | ||||
DIRECT EXPENSES |
8,936 | 8,826 | ||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
1,508 | 969 | ||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
1,561 | 1,832 | ||||||
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION |
28 | 27 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
(81 | ) | (890 | ) | ||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||
Interest income |
6 | 2 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(62 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
Other expense |
(7 | ) | | |||||
Other income, net |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Legal expense related to pre-acquisition activity of
acquired company |
(40 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
(102 | ) | (83 | ) | |||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(183 | ) | (973 | ) | ||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
| (10 | ) | |||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(183 | ) | (983 | ) | ||||
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATION |
||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (25 | ) | |||||
Loss from discontinued operation |
| (25 | ) | |||||
NET LOSS |
$ | (183 | ) | $ | (1,008 | ) | ||
LOSS PER SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED |
||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | ||
Loss from discontinued operation |
| (0.00 | ) | |||||
Net loss per share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | ||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE BASIC AND DILUTED
SHARES OUTSTANDING |
5,147 | 5,040 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
Table of Contents
TEAMSTAFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
REVENUES |
$ | 21,019 | $ | 20,588 | ||||
DIRECT EXPENSES |
18,193 | 18,257 | ||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
2,826 | 2,331 | ||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
3,123 | 3,489 | ||||||
OFFICER SEVERANCE |
| 310 | ||||||
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION |
59 | 53 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
(356 | ) | (1,521 | ) | ||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||
Interest income |
7 | 5 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(107 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||
Other expense |
(7 | ) | | |||||
Other income, net |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Legal expense related to pre-acquisition activity of
acquired company |
(59 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
(164 | ) | (103 | ) | |||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(520 | ) | (1,624 | ) | ||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
| (10 | ) | |||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(520 | ) | (1,634 | ) | ||||
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATION |
||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (810 | ) | |||||
Loss from disposal |
| (349 | ) | |||||
Loss from discontinued operation |
| (1,159 | ) | |||||
NET LOSS |
$ | (520 | ) | $ | (2,793 | ) | ||
LOSS PER SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED |
||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | ||
Loss from discontinued operation |
| (0.23 | ) | |||||
Net loss per share |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.56 | ) | ||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE BASIC AND DILUTED
SHARES OUTSTANDING |
5,144 | 4,985 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
TEAMSTAFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amount in thousands)
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (520 | ) | $ | (2,793 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities, net of divested business: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
59 | 53 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to employee stock option grants |
49 | 70 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to employee restricted stock grants |
14 | 57 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to director restricted stock grants |
20 | 138 | ||||||
Loss on retirement of equipment |
17 | 1 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of divested business: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(631 | ) | 89 | |||||
Other current assets |
63 | 13 | ||||||
Other assets |
(13 | ) | 28 | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued payroll, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
(173 | ) | 355 | |||||
Other long term liabilities |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from discontinued operation |
| 1,121 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(1,118 | ) | (870 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Cash flows from discontinued operation |
| 375 | ||||||
Purchase of equipment, leasehold improvements and software |
(12 | ) | (152 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(12 | ) | 223 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net advances on revolving line of credit |
1,112 | | ||||||
Repayments on capital lease obligations |
(9 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of Common Stock |
150 | |||||||
Cash flows from discontinued operation |
(51 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
1,202 | (95 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
72 | (742 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
1,187 | 2,992 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 1,259 | $ | 2,250 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 107 | $ | 24 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
$ | 58 | $ | 49 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
TEAMSTAFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
(1) ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS:
TeamStaff, Inc. and its subsidiaries (TeamStaff or the Company, also referred to as we, us
and our), provide a range of logistics, healthcare support and technical services to the United
States Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the United States Department of Defense (DoD) and
other US governmental entities. TeamStaffs primary operations are conducted through its subsidiary
TeamStaff Government Solutions, Inc. (TeamStaff GS), located in Loganville, Georgia and its
principal executive office is located at 1 Executive Drive, Suite 130, Somerset, New Jersey 08873,
where its telephone number is (866) 952-1647.
Company History
TeamStaff is a New Jersey corporation that was founded in 1969 as a payroll service company. Over
the years, the Company has evolved into a national provider of contract and permanent medical and
administrative staffing services and today, TeamStaff is a full-service provider of logistics,
healthcare support and technical services to Federal Agencies and the Department of Defense. During
the past 18 months, the Company has taken numerous steps in an effort to enhance the value of
TeamStaff and has fully focused the Companys efforts on the government services market, where the
Company believes it has a proven track record of performance. In connection with the refocusing of
the Companys operations, during the 2010 calendar year, the Company replaced its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer and hired a new Executive Vice President of Corporate
Development, to lead its efforts as a government services provider.
TeamStaff GS, which is currently the Companys only operating subsidiary changed its name from RS
Staffing Services, Inc. on February 12, 2008 to reflect the subsidiarys evolving service
offerings. In connection with the evolution of the Company, on December 28, 2009, TeamStaff and
TeamStaff Rx, Inc. (TeamStaff Rx), a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a definitive Asset
Purchase Agreement with Advantage RN, LLC, for the sale of substantially all of the operating
assets of TeamStaff Rx related to the business of providing travel nurse and allied healthcare
professionals for temporary assignments. The closing of this transaction occurred on January 4,
2010. As discussed in Note 3 to these consolidated financial statements, where additional
information about this transaction is provided, the results of operations, cash flows and related
assets and liabilities of TeamStaff Rx have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements as a discontinued operation.
TeamStaffs other wholly-owned subsidiaries include DSI Staff ConnXions Northeast,
Inc., DSI Staff ConnXions Southwest, Inc., TeamStaff Solutions, Inc., TeamStaff I, Inc., TeamStaff
II, Inc., TeamStaff III, Inc., TeamStaff IV, Inc., TeamStaff VIII, Inc., TeamStaff IX, Inc.,
Digital Insurance Services, Inc., HR2, Inc. and BrightLane.com, Inc. As a result of the sale of our
Professional Employer Organization business in fiscal year 2004 and other Company business changes,
these other subsidiaries are inactive.
(2) LIQUIDITY AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Liquidity
At March 31, 2011 the Company had a net working capital deficit of approximately $3.7 million and
an accumulated deficit of approximately $61.6 million. For the year ended September 30, 2010, the
Company incurred an operating loss and net loss of approximately $4.3 million and $5.8 million,
respectively, and incurred an operating loss and net loss of approximately $0.5 million for the six
months ended March 31, 2011. The Company has a limited amount of cash and equivalents at March 31,
2011 and will be required to rely on operating cash flow and periodic funding, to the extent
available, from its line of credit to sustain the operations of the Company unless it elects to
pursue and is successful in obtaining additional debt or equity funding, as discussed below.
In an effort to improve the Companys cash flows and financial position, the Company has recently
taken measures which are expected to enhance its liquidity by approximately $1,000,000 as a result
of increasing the maximum availability of its credit facility and receiving funding of and/or
commitments for additional equity and/or debt financing. In that regard, as of February 14, 2011,
the Companys largest shareholder, Wynnefield Capital, Inc., and certain of its directors and
executive officers provided assurances for future financings whereby they collectively agreed to
provide up to $500,000 of additional capital to the Company if it determines, prior to February 28,
2012, that such funds are required (the Commitments). As described in Note 7, $150,000 of such
capital was provided on March 31, 2011. In addition, as described in Note 6, on February 9, 2011,
the Company entered into a further amendment of its Loan and Security Agreement with Presidential
Financial Corporation, pursuant to which they agreed to increase the maximum availability under the
Loan and Security Agreement by an additional $500,000 and provide an unbilled receivable facility
within the
8
Table of Contents
limits of the Loan and Security Agreement.
Following this increase, the maximum availability under this loan facility is $3,000,000; subject
to eligible accounts receivable. At March 31, 2011 the amount available was $323,000. In addition,
as described in greater detail below, the parties agreed to amend certain other provisions of the
Loan Agreement, including an extension of the term of the Loan Agreement for an additional year and
the Lender agreed not to seek to terminate the Loan Agreement without cause until after February
29, 2012. In addition, pursuant to its current credit facility, the financial institution also has
the ability to terminate the Companys line of credit immediately upon the occurrence of a defined
event of default, including among others, a material adverse change in the Companys circumstances
or if the financial institution deems itself to be insecure in the ability of the Company to repay
its obligations or, as to the sufficiency of the collateral. At present, the financial institution
has not declared an event of default.
Management believes, at present, that: (a) cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.3 million
as of March 31, 2011, (b) the capital available pursuant to the Commitments, (c) the amounts
available under its line of credit (which, in turn, is limited by the amount of eligible assets)
(d) forecasted operating cash flow; (e) the ultimate non-payment of certain liabilities currently
contested by the Company (classified as current at March 31, 2011) in fiscal 2011, or the
applicable portion of 2012 and (f) effects of cost reduction programs and initiatives should be
sufficient to support the Companys operations for twelve months from the date of these financial
statements. However, should any of these factors not occur substantially as currently expected,
there could be a material adverse effect on the Companys ability to access the level of liquidity
necessary for it to sustain operations at current levels for the next twelve months. In such an
event, management may be forced to make further reductions in spending or to further extend payment
terms with suppliers, liquidate assets where possible, and/or to suspend or curtail planned
programs. Any of these actions could materially harm the Companys business, financial position,
results of operations and future prospects.
Due to the foregoing and to address any need for additional capital, the Company intends to pursue
equity, equity-based and/or debt financing alternatives or other financing in order to raise needed
funds. While the remaining Commitments are unconditional, the specific terms of any financing which
the Company may request under these remaining Commitments are subject to final negotiation among
the parties and the approval of the members of the Companys Board of Directors that are
independent of the other parties involved in accordance with the Companys policy for approving
related-party transactions. Further, such arrangements would be required to be structured in such a
manner so as to comply with the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The parties also
agreed that if the additional financing would be pursuant to a debt instrument, that any such debt
would not mature prior to February 28, 2012. If the Company raises additional funds by selling
shares of common stock or convertible securities, the ownership of its existing shareholders will
be diluted. Further, if additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity or debt
securities, such additional securities may have powers, designations, preferences or rights senior
to our currently outstanding securities. Except for the remaining Commitments, the Company does not
have any firm agreements with any third-parties for such transactions and no assurances can be
given that the Company will be successful in raising any additional capital from financings, or
that additional financing, if at all available, can be obtained on acceptable terms to us. Any
inability to obtain required financing on sufficiently favorable terms could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.
The Company derives a substantial amount of revenue from agencies of the Federal government and, as
described in greater detail in Note 8 on May 5, 2011 was notified of a positive response from the
DVA on proposals submitted in 2010 for renewal (and expansion) of contracts that generated, in
aggregate, approximately 45% of its revenue in the year ended September 30, 2010, in respect of
which the Company holds order cover through June 30, 2011 under existing contracts. In addition,
the Company also holds contractual order cover through June 30, 2011 in respect of contracts that
generated close to a further 50% of its revenue in the year ended September 30, 2010, which are not
yet the subject of requests for proposals at present. The Company believes, based on its past
experience with the DVA, that such contracts are likely in due course, to be further extended by
the DVA on a sole source basis, although no assurances can be given that this will occur.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated interim financial statements included herein have been prepared by TeamStaff,
without audit, pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed
or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. TeamStaff believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in TeamStaffs fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K which was filed on February 14,
2011. This interim financial information reflects, in the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and changes in estimates, where
appropriate) to present fairly the results for the interim periods. The results of operations and
cash flows for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full
year.
9
Table of Contents
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TeamStaff and its
subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The results of
operations, cash flows and related assets and liabilities of TeamStaff Rx have been reclassified to
a discontinued operation in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from those of
continuing businesses for all periods presented.
Revenue Recognition
TeamStaff accounts for its revenues in accordance with ACS 605-45, Reporting Revenues Gross as a
Principal Versus Net as an Agent, and SAB 104, Revenue Recognition. TeamStaff recognizes all
amounts billed to its contract staffing customers as gross revenue because, among other things,
TeamStaff is the primary obligor in the contract staffing arrangement; TeamStaff has pricing
latitude; TeamStaff selects contract employees for a given assignment from a broad pool of
individuals; TeamStaff is at risk for the payment of its direct costs; and TeamStaff assumes a
significant amount of other risks and liabilities as an employer of its contract employees, and
therefore, is deemed to be a principal in regard to these services. TeamStaff also recognizes as
gross revenue and as unbilled receivables, on an accrual basis, any such amounts that relate to
services performed by contract employees which have not yet been billed to the customer as of the
end of the accounting period.
TeamStaff GS is seeking approval from the Federal government for gross profit on retroactive
billing rate increases associated with certain government contracts at which it had employees
staffed on contract assignments. These adjustments are due to changes in the contracted wage
determination rates for these contract employees. A wage determination is the listing of wage rates
and fringe benefit rates for each classification of laborers whom the Administrator of the Wage and
Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has determined to be prevailing in a given
locality. Contractors performing services for the Federal government under certain contracts are
required to pay service employees in various classes no less than the wage rates and fringe
benefits found prevailing in these localities. An audit by the DOL in 2008 at one of the facilities
revealed that notification, as required by contract, was not provided to TeamStaff GS in order to
effectuate the wage increases in a timely manner. Wages for contract employees on assignment at the
time have been adjusted prospectively to the prevailing rate and hourly billing rates to the DVA
have been increased accordingly. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, TeamStaff
recognized nonrecurring revenues of $10.8 million and direct costs of $10.1 million, based on
amounts that are contractually due under its arrangements with the Federal agencies. At March 31,
2011, the amount of the remaining accounts receivable with the DVA approximates $9.3 million and
the related accrued salary and benefits for direct costs approximates $8.7 million. The Company has
been and continues to be in discussions with representatives of the DVA regarding the matter and
anticipates resolution during fiscal 2011. In addition, TeamStaff is in the process of negotiating
a final amount related to gross profit on these adjustments. As such, there may be additional
revenues recognized in future periods once the approval for such additional amounts is obtained.
The ranges of additional revenue and gross profit are estimated to be between $0.4 million and $0.6
million. At present, the Company expects to collect such amounts during fiscal 2011, based on
current discussions and collection efforts. Because these amounts are subject to further government
review, no assurances can be given that we will indeed receive the amounts recorded as accounts
receivable, any additional billings from our government contracts or that if additional amounts are
received, that the amount will be within the range specified above.
Direct costs of services are reflected in TeamStaffs Consolidated Statements of Operations as
direct expenses and are reflective of the type of revenue being generated. Direct costs of the
contract staffing business include wages, employment related taxes and reimbursable expenses.
Goodwill
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, TeamStaff does not amortize the goodwill
associated with TeamStaff GS. TeamStaff continues to review its goodwill for possible impairment or
loss of value at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when
circumstances indicate that a reporting units carrying amount is greater than its fair value. At
September 30, 2010, we performed a goodwill impairment analysis. For the purposes of this analysis,
our estimates of fair value are based on the income approach, which estimates the fair value of the
TeamStaff GS unit based on the future discounted cash flows. Based on the results of the work
performed, the Company has concluded that no impairment loss on goodwill was warranted at September
30, 2010. Major assumptions in the valuation study were the estimates of probability weighted
future cash flows, the estimated terminal value of TeamStaff GS and the discount factor applied to
the estimated future cash flows and terminal value. Estimates of future cash flows were developed
by management having regard to current expectations and potential future opportunities. A terminal
value for the forecast period was estimated based upon data of public companies that management
believes to be similar with respect to the Companys economics, products and markets. The discount
factor used was a cost of capital estimate obtained from a leading third party data provider. The
resulting estimated fair value of goodwill exceeded the carrying value at September 30, 2010 by
more than 40%, resulting in no impairment charge being taken against goodwill. However, a
non-renewal of a major contract or other substantial changes in the assumptions used in the
valuation study could have a material adverse effect on the valuation of goodwill in future periods
and the resulting charge would be material to future periods results of operations.
10
Table of Contents
If an impairment of all the goodwill became necessary, a charge of up to $8.6 million would be
expensed in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations. All remaining goodwill is attributable to the TeamStaff GS reporting unit.
TeamStaff has concluded, at present, that an interim impairment test is not required and there is
not any required impairment of goodwill.
Intangible Assets
As required by applicable accounting standards, TeamStaff does not amortize its tradenames, an
indefinite life intangible asset. TeamStaff continues to review its indefinite life intangible
assets for possible impairment or loss of value at least annually or more frequently upon the
occurrence of an event or when circumstances indicate that an assets carrying amount is greater
than its fair value. At September 30, 2010, we performed an intangible asset impairment analysis.
For the purposes of this analysis, our estimates of fair value are based on the income approach,
which estimates the fair value of the intangible assets based on the future discounted cash flows.
Based on the results of the work performed, the Company concluded that an impairment loss on
intangible assets in the amount of $1.3 million was warranted at September 30, 2010. Major
assumptions in the valuation study were the estimates of probability weighted future cash flows,
the estimated terminal value of the Company and the discount factor applied to the estimated future
cash flows and terminal value. Estimates of future cash flows were developed by management having
regard to current expectations and potential future opportunities. A terminal value for the
forecast period was estimated based upon data of public companies that management believes to be
similar with respect to the Companys economics, products and markets. The discount factor used was
a cost of capital estimate obtained from a leading third party data provider. The resulting
estimated fair value of tradenames were less than the carrying value at September 30, 2010 by
approximately $1.3 million, resulting in an impairment charge of that amount being taken against
the tradenames. In addition, a non-renewal of a major contract or other substantial changes in the
assumptions used in the valuation study could have a material adverse effect on the valuation of
tradenames in future periods and a resulting charge would be material to future periods results of
operations. If an additional impairment write off of all the tradenames and intangible assets
became necessary, a charge of up to $2.6 million would be expensed in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. Teamstaff has concluded, at present, that an interim impairment test is not required
and there is not any required impairment of its tradenames.
Income Taxes
TeamStaff accounts for income taxes in accordance with the liability method, whereby deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and
tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reflected on the consolidated balance
sheet when it is determined that it is more likely than not that the asset will be realized. This
guidance also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. At March 31, 2011,
the Company provided a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance of approximately $14.4 million.
Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation costs for the portion of awards (for which the requisite service has not been
rendered) that are outstanding are recognized as the requisite service is rendered. The
compensation cost for that portion of awards shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those
awards as calculated for recognition purposes under applicable guidance. As of March 31, 2011,
there is $153,000 remaining in unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested option
awards and $150,000 remaining for unvested restricted stock expense for a total unrecognized stock
expense of $303,000 to be recognized in future periods.
Stock Options and Restricted Stock
There was share-based compensation expense for options for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and March 31, 2010 of $17,000 and $56,000, respectively. There was share-based compensation expense
for options for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 of $49,000 and $70,000,
respectively.
During the three months ended
March 31, 2011, Teamstaff did not grant any options. During the six
months ended March 31, 2011, TeamStaff granted 250,000 options per the terms of an employment
agreement with the Companys Executive Vice President and recorded share-based compensation expense
of $18,000 in connection with this grant and $31,000 for all other awards.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, TeamStaff did not grant any shares of restricted
stock. During the six months ended March 31, 2010, TeamStaff granted 42,500 shares of restricted
stock to non-employee directors under its 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (2006 Plan), at the
closing price on the award date of $1.34. All of these shares vested immediately. Stock
compensation expense associated with these grants and all other grants totaled $57,000 and $138,000
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, respectively.
11
Table of Contents
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, Teamstaff did not grant any shares of restricted
stock. During the six months ended March 31, 2011, TeamStaff granted 35,000 shares of restricted
stock to non-employee directors under its 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, at the closing price on
the award date of $.56. All of these shares vested immediately. Stock compensation expense
associated with these grants was $20,000 and $14,000 for all other grants for the six months ended
March 31, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, 32,500 shares of restricted stock
vested. During the six months ended March 31, 2011, 77,500 shares of restricted stock vested.
The stock option activity for the six months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Term | Value | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
722,500 | $ | 1.13 | 7.8 | $ | | ||||||||||
Granted |
250,000 | $ | 0.56 | 9.7 | | |||||||||||
Exercised |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
972,500 | $ | 3.84 | 8.3 | $ | | ||||||||||
At March 31, 2011, there were 222,500 options outstanding that were vested and exercisable and an
additional 750,000 options outstanding that vest to the recipients when the market value of the
Companys stock achieves and maintains defined levels. The Company used a binomial valuation model
and various probability factors in establishing the fair value of these options.
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (i.e.,
the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the period and
the exercise price, times the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders
had all option holders exercised their in the money options on those dates. This amount changes
based on the fair market value of the Companys stock.
The restricted stock activity for the six months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Number of | Grant Date | |||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Restricted stock outstanding, September 30, 2010 |
95,000 | $ | 2.42 | |||||
Granted |
35,000 | 0.56 | ||||||
Issued |
(77,500 | ) | 1.29 | |||||
Cancelled |
| | ||||||
Restricted stock outstanding, March 31, 2011 |
52,500 | $ | 1.42 | |||||
At March 31, 2011, there were 52,500 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding. As of March
31, 2011, there is $150,000 remaining costs related to non-vested restricted stock awards.
At March 31, 2011, the Company had reserved 35,000 shares of common stock for issuance under
various option, shares and warrant plans and arrangements.
Changes in Shareholders Equity
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, additional paid in capital increased by $17,000 as a
result of stock compensation expense and $150,000 as a result of an equity raise. During the six
months ended March 31, 2011, additional paid-in capital increased by $83,000 as a result of
recognized stock compensation expense and $150,000 as a result of the equity raise (see Note 7).
For the six months ended March 31, 2011, there were a total of 536,681 shares issued.
Loss Per Share
Loss per share is calculated by dividing loss available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding and restricted stock grants that vested or are likely
to vest during the period. As such effects are anti-dilutive, there were no differences in the
number of weighted average shares outstanding in determining basic and diluted loss per share in
each of the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
12
Table of Contents
(3) DISCONTINUED OPERATION:
Sale of TeamStaff Rx
Based on an analysis of historical and forecasted results and the Companys strategic initiative to
focus on core business, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company approved and committed to
a formal plan to divest the operations of TeamStaff Rx, Inc. a former wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company. In evaluating the facets of TeamStaff Rxs operations, management concluded that this
business component met the definition of a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the results of
operations, cash flows and related assets and liabilities of TeamStaff Rx for all periods presented
have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from those of
continuing businesses.
Effective December 28, 2009, TeamStaff and TeamStaff Rx entered into a definitive Asset Purchase
Agreement with Advantage RN, providing for the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of
TeamStaff Rx related to TeamStaff Rxs business of providing travel nurse and allied healthcare
professionals for temporary assignments to Advantage RN. The closing of this transaction occurred
on January 4, 2010. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that the purchased assets were acquired
by Advantage RN for a purchase price of up to $425,000, of which: (i) $350,000 in cash was paid at
the closing, and (ii) $75,000 was subject to an escrowed holdback as described in the Asset
Purchase Agreement. On March 25, 2010, the Company and Advantage RN completed the analysis related
to escrow release conditions and reached an agreement as to the final purchase price. Of the
$75,000 held in escrow, $25,000 was returned to the Company and $50,000 was released to Advantage
RN, resulting in a final purchase price of $375,000. Additionally, Advantage RN was obligated to
make rent subsidy payments to TeamStaff Rx totaling $125,000, consisting of: (i) $25,000 paid at
closing, and (ii) an additional $100,000 payable in 10 equal monthly installments beginning on
March 1, 2010. The last rent payment received from Advantage RN was in July 2010. They have since
vacated the premises and ceased making installment payments. The Company intends to pursue a claim
against Advantage RN for all amounts owed. The Company has provided an allowance for their estimate
of uncollectible sub-lease funding. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Advantage RN
has not assumed any debts, obligations or liabilities of TeamStaff Rx nor did it purchase any
accounts receivable outstanding as of the closing date.
Condensed results of the discontinued operation are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,418 | ||||||||
Direct expenses |
| | | (1,255 | ) | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| (33 | ) | | (971 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
| 8 | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (25 | ) | | (810 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from disposal |
| | | (349 | ) | |||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | | $ | (25 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,159 | ) | ||||||
Included in selling, general and administrative expense from discontinued operations for the six
months ended March 31, 2010 is a charge of $0.1 million for severance to certain TeamStaff Rx
employees, $0.3 million in various accrued expenses related to the sale and shut down of the
business, and a loss on the disposal of TeamStaff Rx approximating $0.3 million principally from
recognition of the remaining unfunded operating lease payments. There were no tax benefits
associated with the losses from the discontinued operation.
13
Table of Contents
The following chart details the remaining liabilities from the discontinued operation (amounts in
thousands):
September 30, | Expensed | Paid This | March 31, | |||||||||||||
2010 Balance | This Period | Period | 2011 Balance | |||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities |
$ | 289 | | (51 | ) | $ | 238 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 289 | $ | | $ | (51 | ) | $ | 238 | |||||||
(4) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Payroll Taxes
TeamStaff has received notices from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) claiming taxes, interest
and penalties due related to payroll taxes predominantly from its former PEO operations which were
sold in fiscal 2003. TeamStaff has also received notices from the IRS reporting overpayments of
taxes. Management believes that these notices are predominantly the result of misapplication of
payroll tax payments between its legal entities. If not resolved favorably, the Company may incur
interest and penalties. Until the sale of certain assets related to the former PEO operations,
TeamStaff operated through 17 subsidiaries, and management believes that the IRS has not correctly
identified payments made through certain of the different entities, therefore leading to the
notices. To date, TeamStaff has been working with the IRS to resolve these discrepancies and has
had certain interest and penalty claims abated. TeamStaff has also received notices from the Social
Security Administration claiming variances in wage reporting compared to IRS transcripts. TeamStaff
believes the notices from the Social Security Administration are directly related to the IRS
notices received. TeamStaff had retained the services of Ernst & Young LLP as a consultant to
assist in resolving certain of these matters with the IRS and Social Security Administration.
TeamStaff believes that after the IRS applies all the funds correctly, any significant interest and
penalties will be abated; however, there can be no assurance that each of these matters will be
resolved favorably. In settling various years for specific subsidiaries with the IRS, the Company
has received refunds for those specific periods; however, as the process of settling and concluding
on other periods and subsidiaries is not yet completed, the potential exists for related penalties
and interest. Based upon the most recent correspondence from the IRS and an assessment of open
periods, we believe that our liability of $1.2 million at March 31, 2011 (recorded in accounts
payable) is fairly stated. Interest expense would accrue on such amounts through the ultimate
payment date, unless waived by the IRS. No payments related to this matter were made during the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, and the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, while in
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company paid $1.1 million, related to this matter.
Management believes that the ultimate resolution of these remaining payroll tax matters will not
have a significant adverse effect on its financial position or future results of operations.
Rent Subsidy from Advantage RN
In connection with our disposition of TeamStaff Rx, Advantage RN was obligated to make rent subsidy
payments to TeamStaff Rx totaling $125,000, consisting of: (i) $25,000 paid at closing, and (ii) an
additional $100,000 payable in 10 equal monthly installments beginning on March 1, 2010. The last
rent payment received from Advantage RN was in July 2010. They have since vacated the premises and
ceased making installment payments. The Company intends to pursue a claim against Advantage RN for
all amounts owed, which the Company presently estimates is $50,000. The Company has provided an
allowance for the estimated uncollectible sub-lease funding.
14
Table of Contents
Legal Proceedings
RS Staffing Services, Inc.
On April 17, 2007, a Federal Grand Jury subpoena was issued by the Northern District of Illinois to
the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary,
TeamStaff GS, formerly and then known as RS Staffing Services, requesting production of certain
documents dating back to 1997, prior to the time the Company acquired RS Staffing Services. The
subpoena stated that it was issued in connection with an investigation of possible violations of
Federal criminal laws and related crimes concerning procurement at the DVA. According to the cover
letter accompanying the subpoena, the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (DOJ), along
with the DVA, Office of the Inspector General, are responsible for the current criminal
investigation. RS Staffing Services provides contract staffing at certain DVA hospitals that may be
part of the investigation. The return date for documents called for by the subpoena was May 17,
2007. In connection with the same investigation, agents with the DVA, Office of Inspector General,
executed a search warrant at the Monroe, Georgia offices of RS Staffing Services.
The government has advised TeamStaff that the DOJ has no intent to charge TeamStaff or any of its
subsidiaries or employees in connection with the Federal investigation of contract practices at
various government owned/contractor operated facilities. TeamStaff remains committed to cooperate
with the DOJs investigation of other parties.
The Company originally acquired RS Staffing Services in June 2005. As part of the purchase price of
the acquisition, the Company issued to the former owners of RS Staffing Services: (i) a $3.0
million promissory note, of which $1.5 million in principal and interest of $150,000 was paid in
June 2006; and (ii) certain stock in the Company. On May 31, 2007, the Company sent a notice of
indemnification claim to the former owners for costs that have been incurred in connection with the
investigation. Effective June 1, 2007, the Company and former owners of RS Staffing Services
reached an agreement to extend the due date from June 8, 2007 to December 31, 2008 with respect to
the remaining $1.5 million principal payable and accrued interest payable. Such agreement was
extended to August 31, 2010, but has not been further renewed. As of March 31, 2011, the amount has
not been settled and negotiations with the former owners of RS Staffing Services are as yet to be
resolved. The Company recognized expenses related to legal representation and costs incurred in
connection with the investigation and dispute in the amount of $40,000 and $56,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as a component of other income (expense). The
Company recognized expenses related to legal representation and costs incurred in connection with
the investigation and dispute in the amount of $59,000 and $57,000 during the six months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as a component of other income (expense). Cumulative costs
related to this matter approximate $1.8 million. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement with RS
Staffing Services, the Company has notified the former owners of RS Staffing Services that it is
the Companys intention to exercise its right to set off the payment of such expenses against the
remaining principal and accrued interest due to the former owners of RS Staffing Services. The
former owners of RS Staffing Services have notified the Company of their disagreement with the
Companys course of action and of the existence of partial counter-claims in regard to allegations
that the Company without due cause failed to permit them to sell certain of their stock in the
Company at a time when the Companys per share price was higher than its current per share price.
The parties have unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate a settlement and the claimants have
indicated their intention to proceed to mediation, as provided for in the stock purchase agreement.
The Company will pursue the recovery as a right of offset in future periods. Management has a good
faith belief that the Company will recover such amounts; however, generally accepted accounting
principles preclude the Company from recording an offset to the note payable to the former owners
of RS Staffing Services until the final amount of the claim is settled and determinable. At
present, no assurances can be given that the former owners of RS Staffing Services would not pursue
action against us or that the Company will be successful in the offset of such amounts against the
outstanding debt and accrued interest from notice date forward, if any, or in defending the partial
counter-claims. Accordingly, the Company has expensed costs incurred related to the investigation
through March 31, 2011.
Other Matters
On October 2, 2008, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a
subpoena to TeamStaff GS regarding the alleged wrongful termination of certain employees who were
employed at a federal facility staffed by TeamStaff GS contract employees. The wrongful termination
is alleged to have occurred when the former employees were terminated because they could not
satisfy English proficiency requirements imposed by the Federal government. TeamStaff GS has
produced all documents that it believes were required by the subpoena and has submitted its
position statement to the EEOC. It is unclear, at present, if or when the EEOC will respond.
As a commercial enterprise and employer, we are subject to various claims and legal actions in the
ordinary course of business. These matters can include professional liability, employment-relations
issues, workers compensation, tax, payroll and employee-related matters and inquiries and
investigations by governmental agencies regarding our employment practices or other matters. We are
not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that we believe is reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In connection with its medical staffing business, TeamStaff is exposed to potential liability for
the acts, errors or omissions of its contract
medical employees. The professional liability insurance policy provides up to $5,000,000 aggregate
coverage with a $2,000,000 per occurrence limit. Although TeamStaff believes the liability
insurance is reasonable under the circumstances to protect it from liability for such claims, there
can be no assurance that such insurance will be adequate to cover all potential claims.
15
Table of Contents
TeamStaff is engaged in no other litigation, the effect of which is expected to have a material
adverse impact on TeamStaffs results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Employment Agreements
On December 1, 2010, the Company named John F. Armstrong as our Executive Vice President of
Corporate Development. On February 7, 2011, the Company and Mr. Armstrong entered into an
employment agreement. The following is a description of the terms of employment agreed upon by the
Company and Mr. Armstrong. Mr. Armstrongs appointment as Executive Vice President of Corporate
Development commenced December 1, 2010 and the employment agreement will expire on November 30,
2013. Mr. Armstrong will receive an initial base salary of $215,000 per annum. Mr. Armstrong may
receive an annual bonus of up to 50% of base salary based on performance targets and other key
objectives established by the Management Resources and Compensation Committee of the board of
directors. Target bonus will be adjusted by 2% of base salary for every 1% of variance between
targets and actual results and no bonus will be awarded if results are less than 90% of target and
no bonus will exceed 70% of base salary. For the Companys 2011 fiscal year, $40,000 of the
potential bonus will be guaranteed provided Mr. Armstrong remains employed as of the date on which
the bonus payment is made. The Company granted Mr. Armstrong options to purchase 250,000 shares of
common stock under our 2006 Plan. The options vested or shall vest as follows: 50,000 options
vested immediately; 100,000 options shall vest if the closing price of the Companys common stock
equals or exceeds $3.00 per share for ten consecutive trading days; an additional 50,000 options
shall vest if the closing price of the Companys common stock equals or exceeds $5.00 per share for
ten consecutive trading days; and an additional 50,000 options shall vest if the closing price of
the Companys common stock equals or exceeds $7.00 per share for ten consecutive trading days. The
options, to the extent vested, shall be exercisable for a period of ten years at the per share
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date his
employment commenced.
(5) PREPAID WORKERS COMPENSATION:
As part of the Companys discontinued PEO operations, TeamStaff had a workers compensation program
with Zurich, which covered the period from March 22, 2002 through November 16, 2003, inclusive.
Payments for the policy were made to a trust monthly based on projected claims for the policy
period. Interest on all assets held in the trust is credited to TeamStaff. Payments for claims and
claims expenses are made from the trust. From time-to-time, trust assets have been refunded to the
Company based on Zurichs and managers overall assessment of claims experience and historical and
projected settlements. In June 2009 and March 2008, Zurich reduced the collateral requirements on
outstanding workers compensation claims and released $114,000 and $350,000, respectively, in trust
account funds back to the Company. The final amount of trust funds that could be refunded to the
Company is subject to a number of uncertainties (e.g. claim settlements and experience, health care
costs, the extended statutory filing periods for such claims); however, based on a third partys
study of claims experience, TeamStaff estimates that at March 31, 2011, the remaining prepaid asset
of $0.3 million will be received within the next twelve months. This amount is reflected on
TeamStaffs balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 as a current asset, in addition to approximately
$0.2 million related to current policy deposits.
(6) DEBT:
Current Facility
On July 29, 2010, TeamStaff GS entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan Agreement)
with Presidential Financial Corporation (the Lender). Under the Loan Agreement, the Lender agreed
to provide a two (2) year loan and security facility to TeamStaff GS in an aggregate amount of up
to $1.5 million, subject to the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement. In November 2010, the
Lender agreed, by means of an amendment to the Loan Agreement, to increase the maximum amount
available under the facility from $1.5 million to $2.5 million. In February 2011 the Company and
Lender further increased the maximum availability under the Loan Agreement by an additional
$500,000 to $3.0 million and provided an unbilled receivable facility within the limits of the Loan
Agreement. An interest rate premium of 2% is payable in respect of any advances secured by unbilled
accounts receivable, which are subject to a sub-facility limit of $500,000 and an advance rate of
75%. The loan is secured by a security interest and lien on all of TeamStaff GSs accounts, account
deposits, letters of credit and investment property, chattel paper, furniture, fixtures and
equipment, instruments, investment property, general intangibles, deposit accounts, inventory,
other property, all proceeds and products of the foregoing (including proceeds of any insurance
policies and claims against third parties for loss of any of the foregoing) and all books and
records related thereto. TeamStaff GSs ability to request loan advances under the Loan Agreement
is subject to: (i) computation of TeamStaff GSs advance availability limit based on eligible
accounts receivables
(as defined in the Loan Agreement) multiplied by the Accounts Advance Rate established by the
Lender which initially shall be 85% and may be increased or decreased by the Lender in exercise of
its discretion; and (ii) compliance with the covenants and conditions of the loan. The loan was
initially for a term of 24 months and after giving effect to the February 2011 amendment, which
also extended the term of the Loan Agreement by 12 months, will mature on July 29, 2013.
16
Table of Contents
Interest on the loan accrues on the daily unpaid balance of the loan advances secured by billed
receivables. Following the February 2011 amendment to the Loan Agreement, the interest rate under
the Loan and Security Agreement is the greater of (a) 3.25% or (b)(i) 1.95% above the Wall Street
Journal Prime rate on the accounts receivable portion of the credit line and (ii) 3.95% above the
Wall Street Journal Prime rate on the unbilled accounts portion. The interest rate at March 31,
2011 was 5.2%. In addition, TeamStaff GS will pay certain other related fees and expense
reimbursements including a monthly service charge of 0.65% based on the average daily loan balance
which shall accrue daily and be due and payable on the last day of each month so long as the Loan
Agreement is outstanding. At March 31, 2011, the amount of the unused availability under the line
was $323,000. The amount outstanding as of March 31, 2011 was $1,474,000.
The Loan Agreement requires compliance with customary covenants and contains restrictions on the
Companys ability to engage in certain transactions. Among other matters, under the loan agreement
we may not, without consent of the Lender, (i) merge or consolidate with another entity, form any
new subsidiary or acquire any interest in a third party; (ii) acquire any assets except in the
ordinary course of business; (iii) enter into any transaction outside the ordinary course of
business; (iv) sell or transfer collateral; (v) make any loans to, or investments in, any affiliate
or enter into any transaction with an affiliate other than on an arms-length basis; (vi) incur any
debt outside the ordinary course of business; (vii) pay or declare any dividends or other
distributions; or (viii) redeem, retire or purchase any of our equity interests exceeding $50,000.
In addition, the Loan Agreement requires TeamStaff GS to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of
at least $1,000,000 on a trailing 12-month basis. Further, without the consent of the Lender, the
Company is also restricted from making any payments in respect of other outstanding indebtedness.
The Lender may terminate the Loan Agreement at any time upon 60 days written notice after February
29, 2012 and the Loan Agreement provides for customary events of default following which the Lender
may, at its option, terminate the loan agreement and accelerate the repayment of any amount
outstanding. The defined events of default include, among other things, a material adverse change
in the Companys circumstances, or if the Lender deems itself insecure in the ability of the
Company to repay its obligations, or as to the sufficiency of the collateral.
As part of the February 2011 amendment, the Lender also agreed to waive the Companys
non-compliance with the covenant under the Loan Agreement to furnish them with a copy of TeamStaff
GS financial statements within 90 days after the end of its fiscal year. In addition to granting
this waiver, the Lender also agreed to modify this covenant to require that the Company provide
them, within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, audited consolidated financial statements
of the Company and its subsidiaries as of the end of such fiscal year and, in addition, at the same
time, furnish consolidating income statement and balance sheet schedules, including a
reconciliation with TeamStaff GSs financial information.
TeamStaff has concurrently executed a Corporate Guaranty Agreement with Lender pursuant to which it
has guaranteed all of the obligations of Teamstaff GS under the Loan Agreement.
(7) SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
On March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the Purchase
Agreement) with a limited number of accredited investors pursuant to which the Company sold an
aggregate of $225,000 for 459,181 shares of its Common Stock to such persons in a private
transaction (the Equity Investment). The purchasers participating in the transaction are members
of the Companys Board of Directors and management team (the Purchasers). The transaction
closed on March 31, 2011. Of this amount, the Company received $150,000 in total cash proceeds for
the purchase of the shares of Common Stock and three of the purchasers agreed with the Company to
pay the purchase price for the shares of Common Stock by granting an offsetting credit to the
Company for an amount equal to the purchase price and authorizing the Company to apply such credit
against any obligation of the Company to such person within twelve months of the closing date,
except for base salary. The shares to which the credit relates are to be held by the Company until
the credit is applied and will be cancelled upon the one year anniversary to the extent the credit
is not applied. The aggregate amount of such credits totaled $75,000. The Company intends to use
these proceeds for general working capital. The value ascribed to the Equity Investment was based
on the fair value of the Companys stock on March 31, 2011.
(8) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
Management evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statements were issued.
Based on this evaluation, the Company has determined, except for the matter described below, that
no subsequent events have occurred which require disclosure through the date that
these financial statements are issued.
On May 5, 2011, TeamStaff GS entered into a single source Blanket Purchase Agreement with the DVA
for the procurement of integrated medical support for the Department of Veterans Affairs
Consolidated Mail Outpatient Pharmacy (CMOP) program. The tasks to be performed include pharmacy
and pharmacy technician services in support of pharmacy production management at seven locations.
The maximum total value under this award is expected to be approximately $140,000,000 pursuant to
site-specific task orders to be rendered by the DVA. Work is expected to begin on July 1, 2011 and
may continue for a five year term expiring April 30, 2016. The agreement is subject to the Federal
Acquisition Regulations and there can be no assurance as to the actual amount of services that the
Company will ultimately provide under the agreement.
17
Table of Contents
ITEM 2: | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward Looking and Cautionary Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the 1995 Reform Act), Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
TeamStaff desires to avail itself of certain safe harbor provisions of the 1995 Reform Act and is
therefore including this special note to enable TeamStaff to do so. Forward-looking statements are
identified by words such as believe, anticipate, expect, intend, plan, will, may and
other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or
other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements included in this report involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors which could cause TeamStaffs actual results, performance (financial or
operating) or achievements to differ from the future results, performance (financial or operating)
or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We based these
forward-looking statements on our current expectations and best estimates and projections about
future events. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by,
these forward-looking statements. The following factors (among others) could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this report:
our ability to continue to recruit qualified healthcare and other professionals and administrative
staff at reasonable costs; our ability to obtain any needed financing; our ability to attract and
retain sales and operational personnel; our ability to secure contract awards, including the
ability to secure renewals of contracts under which we currently provide services; our ability to
enter into contracts with United States Government facilities and agencies on terms attractive to
us and to secure orders related to those contracts; changes in the timing of orders for and our
placement of professionals and administrative staff; the overall level of demand for the services
we provide; the variation in pricing of the contracts under which we place professionals; our
ability to manage growth effectively; the performance of our management information and
communication systems; the effect of existing or future government legislation and regulation;
changes in government and customer priorities and requirements (including changes to respond to the
priorities of Congress and the Administration, budgetary constraints, and cost-cutting
initiatives); economic, business and political conditions domestically; the impact of medical
malpractice and other claims asserted against us; the disruption or adverse impact to our business
as a result of a terrorist attack; our ability to carry out our business strategy; the loss of key
officers, and management personnel; the competitive environment for our services; the effect of
recognition by us of an impairment to goodwill and intangible assets; other tax and regulatory
issues and developments; and the effect of adjustments by us to accruals for self-insured
retentions.
Other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those implied by the forward-looking
statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010 and our other reports filed with the SEC. We undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements in this filing to reflect events
or circumstances that occur after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
See Note 2 of TeamStaffs 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K as well as Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
contained therein for a discussion on critical accounting policies and estimates.
Goodwill
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, TeamStaff does not amortize the goodwill
associated with TeamStaff GS. TeamStaff continues to review its goodwill for possible impairment or
loss of value at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when
circumstances indicate that a reporting units carrying amount is greater than its fair value. At
September 30, 2010, we performed a goodwill impairment analysis. For the purposes of this analysis,
our estimates of fair value are based on the income approach, which estimates the fair value of the
TeamStaff GS unit based on the future discounted cash flows. Based on the results of the work
performed, the Company has concluded that no impairment loss on goodwill was warranted at September
30, 2010. Major assumptions in the valuation study were the estimates of probability weighted
future cash flows, the estimated terminal value of the company and the discount factor applied to
the estimated future cash flows and terminal value. Estimates of future cash flows were developed
by management having regard to current expectations and potential future opportunities. A terminal
value for the forecast period was estimated based upon data of public companies that management
believes to be similar with respect to the Companys economics, products and markets. The discount
factor used was a cost of capital estimate obtained from a leading third party data provider. The
resulting estimated fair value of goodwill exceeded the carrying value at September 30, 2010 by
more than 40%, resulting in no impairment charge being taken against goodwill. However, a
non-renewal of a major contract or other substantial changes in the assumptions used in the
valuation study could have a material adverse effect on the valuation of goodwill in future periods
and the resulting charge would be material to future periods results of operations.
18
Table of Contents
If an impairment of all the goodwill became necessary, a charge of up to $8.6 million would be
expensed in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations. All remaining goodwill is attributable to the TeamStaff GS reporting
unit.
Intangible Assets
As required by applicable accounting standards, TeamStaff does not amortize its tradenames, since
such asset is an indefinite life intangible asset. TeamStaff continues to review its indefinite
life intangible assets for possible impairment or loss of value at least annually or more
frequently upon the occurrence of an event or when circumstances indicate that an assets carrying
amount is greater than its fair value. At September 30, 2010, we performed an intangible asset
impairment analysis. For the purposes of this analysis, our estimates of fair value are based on
the income approach, which estimates the fair value of the intangible assets based on the future
discounted cash flows. Based on the results of the work performed, the Company has concluded that
an impairment loss on intangible assets in the amount of $1.3 million was warranted at September
30, 2010. Major assumptions in the valuation study were the estimates of probability weighted
future cash flows, the estimated terminal value of the company and the discount factor applied to
the estimated future cash flows and terminal value. Estimates of future cash flows were developed
by management having regard to current expectations and potential future opportunities. A terminal
value for the forecast period was estimated based upon data of public companies that management
believes to be similar with respect to the Companys economics, products and markets. The discount
factor used was a cost of capital estimate obtained from a leading third party data provider. The
resulting estimated fair value of tradenames were less than the carrying value at September 30,
2010 by approximately $1.3 million, resulting in an impairment charge of that amount being taken
against the tradenames. In addition, a non-renewal of a major contract or other substantial changes
in the assumptions used in the valuation study could have a material adverse effect on the
valuation of tradenames in future periods and a resulting charge would be material to future
periods results of operations. If an additional impairment write off of all the tradenames and
intangible assets became necessary, a charge of up to $2.6 million would be expensed in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. TeamStaff has concluded, at present, that there is not any
required impairment of its tradenames.
Income Taxes
TeamStaff accounts for income taxes in accordance with the liability method, whereby deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and
tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reflected on the consolidated balance
sheet when it is determined that it is more likely than not that the asset will be realized. This
guidance also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. At March 31, 2011,
the Company provided a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance of approximately $14.4 million.
Overview
Business Description
We are a New Jersey corporation that was founded in 1969 as a payroll service company. Over the
years, we evolved into a national provider of contract and permanent medical and administrative
staffing services and today TeamStaff is a full-service provider of logistics, healthcare support
and technical services to Federal Agencies and the Department of Defense. During the past 18
months, we have taken numerous steps in an effort to enhance the value of TeamStaff and have fully
focused our efforts on the government services market, where we believe we have a proven track
record of performance. In connection with the refocusing of our operations, we have replaced our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and hired a new Executive Vice President of
Corporate Development, to lead our efforts as a government services provider.
Having completed an extensive review and analysis of its core competencies, prospective growth
markets within the Federal and DoD space, and its competitiveness within the addressable markets,
TeamStaff has determined its three principal lines of services for its 2011 fiscal year are as
follows:
Logistics & Technical Services This line of service draws heavily upon TeamStaff GS proven
logistics expertise and processes in areas involving supply chain management, performance-based
logistics, inventory management, statistical process control, packaging/handling/storage &
transportation, and supply support operations. In addition, it embodies program and project
management, engineering and prototype fabrication services, equipment and non-tactical vehicle
operations and maintenance, hazardous material management, facilities and shipyard support
services and more. In fiscal 2010, approximately 45% of our revenue was derived from this line of
service.
|
19
Table of Contents
Healthcare Delivery Solutions Leveraging a strong heritage in medical, pharmaceutical, and
associated facilities management
TeamStaff is well-positioned to expand and diversify its customer base in this area.
TeamStaff-developed tools such as the web-based Practicioner Resource Allocation Tool coupled
with expert recruiting talent and tools provide for a degree of differentiation needed to compete
favorably in this space. Professional services have included critical care, medical/surgical,
emergency room/trauma center, behavioral health and trauma brain injury. Allied support includes
a wide range including MRI technology, diagnostic sonography, phlebotomy, dosimetry, physical
therapy, pharmaceuticals and others. In fiscal 2010 approximately 45% of our revenue was derived
from this line of service. |
Contingency/Staff Augmentation This line of service combines the ability to provide disaster
and emergency response services with our legacy staffing and workforce augmentation services.
TeamStaffs outstanding track record of response during hurricanes Rita and Katrina demonstrates
its ability to support major federal and DoD opportunities in this area. General staffing and
selective recruitment process outsourcing are key components of this business area. Less than
five percent of fiscal 2010 revenue was derived from this line of service. |
Management believes that streamlining the Companys strategic focus around these three lines of
services serves to align its resourcing and investments decisions around a cohesive set of business
objectives. Equally important in this evolution is the decision to exit previous market focus areas
with high barriers to entry and traditionally low margins for the Company (including commercial &
federal IT and general administrative temporary staffing services).
TeamStaffs principal operations are conducted through its subsidiary, TeamStaff Government
Solutions, Inc. (TeamStaff GS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TeamStaff, Inc. TeamStaff GS, which
is currently the Companys only operating subsidiary changed its name from RS Staffing Services,
Inc. on February 12, 2008 to reflect the subsidiarys evolving service offerings. In connection
with the evolution of our company, on December 28, 2009, TeamStaff and TeamStaff Rx, Inc.
(TeamStaff Rx), a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement
with Advantage RN, LLC, for the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of TeamStaff Rx
related to our business of providing travel nurse and allied healthcare professionals for temporary
assignments. The closing of this transaction occurred on January 4, 2010.
TeamStaff provides logistics, healthcare support and other technical services to U.S. government
entities through TeamStaff GS and is completely focused on successfully performing, effectively
partnering, and profitably growing its direct and in-direct (as a sub-contractor to others)
business with federal government agencies, namely the Department of Veteran Affairs (the DVA) and
the Department of Defense (DoD). In recent years the Company has provided services for a range of
DoD clients including but not limited to, the US Army Installation Management Commands at Fort
Benning and Fort Gordon, GA, the Army Transportation Center at Fort Eustis, VA, Patrick Air Force
Base, FL, Seymore Johnson Air Force Base, NC, Madigan and Tripler Army Medical Centers, WA and HI
respectively, National Naval Medical Centers, and the Army Corps of Engineers. In addition to its
largest customer, the Department of Veteran Affairs, other federal non-DoD customers have included
the Department of Energy, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Treasury, the
Forestry Service, FEMA and the Center for Disease Control.
TeamStaff remains particularly dependent on the continuation of its relationship with the DVA. As
previously reported, in January 2008 TeamStaff GS was issued purchase orders to provide support
services at six of the DVAs seven consolidated pharmacy distribution centers from the DVA national
contracting office. Although the current task orders expired on December 31, 2009, continuation of
services extensions for locations serviced by TeamStaff GS have been granted by the DVA to us
through June 30, 2011 with respect to both pharmaceutical services and logistic services. The DVA
released a new request for proposal related to pharmaceutical services in 2010 and the Company
submitted a proposal in a timely manner. The DVA has not as of yet published a request for
proposals with respect to the provision of logistic services at these locations. On May 5, 2011,
TeamStaff GS entered into a single source Blanket Purchase Agreement with the DVA for the
procurement of pharmaceutical services at all seven of the DVAs consolidated pharmacy distribution
centers. This is expected to result in an increase in the annual run-rate of pharmaceutical
services provided by the Company over that being performed under the expiring contracts as the
maximum total value under this award is expected to be approximately $140,000,000 pursuant to
site-specific task orders to be rendered by the DVA. The terms of these arrangements are expected
to begin on July 1, 2011 and may continue for a five year term expiring April 30, 2016. The
agreement is subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulations and there can be no assurance as to the
actual amount of services that the Company will ultimately provide under the agreement.
TeamStaffs new leadership and management team possess significant experience in operating and
growing government services businesses and manages over 800 employees in over 20 states. Committed
to providing top-quality services, TeamStaffs managers are trained and certified (where
applicable) in management processes utilized by the DoD and other Federal agencies. TeamStaff GS
has developed a strong track record of delivering best-value and on-schedule services to its varied
clients. TeamStaff has an on-going process to tailor its infrastructure to align with its remaining
core business of government services.
20
Table of Contents
Recent Business Trends
TeamStaff has developed a strategic plan which leverages the core competencies of TeamStaff GS in
the areas of: (1) Logistics and Technical Services, (2) Healthcare Delivery Solutions and (3)
Contingency & Staff Augmentation Services. The Company has a long history of providing these
services to federal clients, the DVA in particular. The ompany has transitioned its executive
management team to better align with its government services focus and the new business development
focus will seek to compete in a much larger scale for business opportunities in the three lines of
business cited above. All commercial staffing business and resources have been divested or
replaced.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the government services market overall was severely
impacted by the Federal governments dependence upon a Continuing Resolution for fiscal year
funding. Many government contract awards were delayed, while others were operating with reduced
funding. TeamStaff weathered this period with no significant erosion to its work level or revenue
stream during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and was able to achieve a significant reduction in its loss
from operations after achieving an improved gross margin and significantly reducing Selling, General
and Administrative expenses.
Management remains committed to expanding its business with the DVA, which has been our largest
customer (95% of revenue in fiscal 2010) followed by the DoD, while leveraging its strengths to
profitably grow new business in adjacent logistics and healthcare accounts. Having developed a
more robust pipeline of new business opportunities for both near-term and long-term objectives, we
continue to see delays in government agency awards, due in part, to the Continuing Resolution and
shortage in the government acquisition workforce. New business development processes have been put
into place and new resources with successful track records in these areas have been secured. Over
recent months the Company has developed a substantial new business pipeline and is working to
implement an accelerated growth plan though the typical sales cycle is 18 to 24 months for major
awards. In addition, the Company has established several new teaming and partnership arrangements
with key companies with a view to assisting in profitably growing the business. Meanwhile
expenditures continue to be constrained and the Company has implemented cost reduction initiatives
such as: indirect personnel hiring freeze and headcount reductions; a temporary furlough program
and salary freezes; restricted travel; terminated non-value added vendor agreements and negotiated
significant cost reductions with continuing vendors.; and consolidated our benefit plans, resulting
in additional savings.
Though our nations economy continues to create headwinds for all markets, management has found
that many government services industry analysts project a favorable market outlook. Based on its
research and market analysis, management believes that the federal governments healthcare budget
remains a top priority and that U.S. Defense Logistics Agency will continue to be the largest
contractor base agency. Further, there has been an increase in mergers and acquisition activity
within the government services space due to an interest on the part of acquirers to reposition
capability and customer portfolios in areas where future growth is anticipated. Management also
believes that the most significant of the federal governments in-sourcing efforts have been
completed. Further, management has found that many analysts continue to view the federal services
market remains as an attractive growth area with quality customer credit (i.e. federal government)
as a focus of buyer group portfolios and that strategically-focused and niche firms that can offer
a differentiated product or service offering to support high demand areas will be considered higher
value companies. Although we cannot provide any assurances of our growth or profitability, based on
these factors, management believes that TeamStaffs new strategic direction to leverage and invest
in its government services strengths within its market sector offers the potential for
significantly enhanced shareholder value in the foreseeable future.
Further, under the new leadership team, the Company has developed a substantial qualified pipeline
of opportunities to bid for contracts with DoD and other Federal agencies through fiscal year 2012.
Many of these are through teaming arrangements with other strategic partner companies.
21
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected consolidated statements of
operations data expressed as a percentage of revenue:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations: | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Direct Expenses |
85.6 | % | 90.1 | % | 86.6 | % | 88.7 | % | ||||||||
Gross Profit |
14.4 | % | 9.9 | % | 13.4 | % | 11.3 | % | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
14.9 | % | 18.7 | % | 14.9 | % | 16.9 | % | ||||||||
Officer Severance |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.5 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
0.3 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.3 | % | ||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
-0.8 | % | -9.1 | % | -1.8 | % | -7.4 | % | ||||||||
Other income (expense) |
-1.0 | % | -0.8 | % | -0.8 | % | -0.5 | % | ||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
before tax |
-1.8 | % | -9.9 | % | -2.6 | % | -7.9 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
0.0 | % | -0.1 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
-1.8 | % | -10.0 | % | -2.6 | % | -7.9 | % | ||||||||
Loss from discontinued operation |
0.0 | % | -0.3 | % | 0.0 | % | -5.6 | % | ||||||||
Net loss |
-1.8 | % | -10.3 | % | -2.6 | % | -13.5 | % | ||||||||
Revenues from TeamStaffs operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $10.4
million and $9.8 million, respectively, which represent an increase of $0.6 million or 6% over the
prior fiscal year period. The increase in revenues is due primarily to the impact of increased
overtime as well as net increases in headcount at certain Government facilities related to federal
government out sourcing certain positions.
Revenues from TeamStaffs operations for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $21.0
million and $20.6 million respectively, which represents an increase of $0.4 million or 1.9% over
the prior fiscal period. The increase in revenues from continuing operations is due primarily to
the impact of increased overtime as well as net increases in headcount at certain Government
facilities related to federal government out sourcing certain positions.
Direct expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $8.9 million and $8.8
million, respectively. As a percentage of revenue, direct expenses were 85.6% and 90.1%,
respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. See the discussion on gross
profit directly below for an explanation of the decrease in direct expenses as a percentage of
revenue.
Direct expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $18.2 million and $18.3
million. As a percentage of revenue, direct expenses were 86.6% and 88.7%, respectively, for the
six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. See the discussion on gross profit directly below for an
explanation of the reduction in direct expenses as a percentage of revenue.
Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $1.5 million and $1.0 million,
respectively which represents an increase of $0.5 million or 50% over the prior fiscal year period.
Gross profit from continuing operations, as a percentage of revenue, was 14.4% and 9.9%, for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The key drivers for the period over
period increase in gross profit (as a percentage of revenue) were greater overtime at certain
government facilities which earn a higher gross profit margin and a reduction in direct expenses of
approximately $0.2 million related to obtaining an independent trustee consent in fiscal 2011 to
utilization of surplus assets in a medical benefit plan which the Company had previously funded in
connection with a completed commercial contract.
Gross profit for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $2.8 million and $2.3 million,
respectively which represents an increase $0.5 million or 22% over the prior fiscal year period.
Gross profit from continuing operations, as a percentage of revenue, was 13.4% and 11.3%, for the
six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The key drivers for the period over period
increase in gross profit (as a percentage of revenue) are greater overtime at certain government
facilities which earn a higher gross profit margin and a reduction in direct expenses of
approximately $0.2 million related to obtaining independent trustee consent in the second quarter of
fiscal 2011 to
utilization of surplus assets in a benefit plan which the Company had previously funded in
connection with a no longer on-going commercial contract.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 were $1.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, which represent a decrease of $0.2 million,
or 11.1%. The decrease is primarily due to cost reduction initiatives, which have included:
headcount reductions; a temporary furlough program; and negotiating significant cost reductions
with vendors.
22
Table of Contents
SG&A expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $3.1 million and $3.5 million,
respectively, which represent a decrease of $0.4 million, or 11.4%. The decrease reflects cost
reduction initiatives, which have included: headcount reductions; a temporary furlough program; and
negotiating significant cost reductions with vendors.
Officer severance for the Companys former Chief Executive Officer in the amount of $0.3 million
during the six months ended March 31, 2010 did not reoccur in the six months ended March 31, 2011.
Depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $28,000 and $27,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $59,000 and $53,000 for the six months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.1 million as compared to loss
from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $.9 million. This represents an
improvement of $0.8 million in results from operations from the prior fiscal period. The
improvement is due to the above mentioned increase in gross profits and reduction in SG&A expenses
for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Loss from operations for the six months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.4 million as compared to loss
from operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 of $1.5 million. This represents an
improvement of $1.1 million in results from operations from the prior fiscal period. The
improvement is due to the above mentioned increase in gross profits, reduction in SG&A expenses and
non-recurring of officer severance in the six months ended March 31, 2011.
Interest income and other income were negligible for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010. The comparative increases in interest income arose due to increased collateral deposits.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $62,000 and
$30,000 respectively. The increase of $32,000 was due to increased borrowings with our existing
credit facility.
Interest expense for the six months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $107,000 and
$53,000 respectively. The increase of $54,000 was due to increased borrowings with our existing
credit facility.
The Company recorded other expense of $40,000 and $56,000, for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively, and $59,000 and $57,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively, related to legal representation and investigation and dispute related costs
incurred in connection with the Federal Grand Jury subpoena issued to our subsidiary formerly known
as RS Staffing Services on April 17, 2007. The subpoena requested production of certain documents
dating back to 1997. The Company acquired RS Staffing effective as of June 2005. These expenses are
classified as non-operating expenses because the subpoena relates to activity prior to the
acquisition.
The Company has provided a 100% deferred tax valuation allowance because it believes that it cannot
be considered more likely than not that it will be able to realize the full benefit of the deferred
tax asset. The Company determined that negative evidence, including historic and current taxable
losses, as well as uncertainties related to the ability to utilize certain Federal and state net
loss carry forwards, outweighed any objectively verifiable positive factors, and as such, concluded
that a valuation allowance was necessary. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the
Company historically has considered all positive and negative evidence, including scheduled
reversals of deferred tax liabilities, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies and recent
financial performance. The Company did not record a Federal or State tax benefit for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Loss from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.2 million, or
$0.04 per basic and diluted share, as compared to loss from continuing operations of $1.0 million,
or $0.20 per basic and diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
23
Table of Contents
Loss from continuing operations for the six months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.5 million, or $0.10
per basic and diluted share, as compared to loss from continuing operations of $1.6 million, or
$0.33 per basic and diluted share, for the six months ended March 31, 2010.
There was no net income or loss from discontinued operations for the three months or six months
ended March 31, 2011.
Loss from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $25,000 or $0.00
per basic and diluted share arising from operations of the TeamStaff Rx discontinued business.
Loss from discontinued operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $1.2 million or $0.23
per basic and diluted share, with loss
from operations of the TeamStaff Rx discontinued business of $0.8 million. This includes the
operating loss as well as a charge of $0.1 million for severance to certain TeamStaff Rx employees
and $0.3 million in various accrued expenses related to the sale and shut down of the business.
Loss from disposal of the TeamStaff Rx discontinued business was $0.3 million. Included in this
loss are expenses approximating $0.3 million principally from recognition of the remaining unfunded
operating lease payments, net of estimated rent subsidy, as well as legal expenses related to the
sale.
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.2 million, or $0.04 per basic and diluted
share, as compared to net loss of $1.0 million, or $0.20 per basic and diluted share, for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. This represents a reduction in net loss of $0.8 million primarily due
to improved gross profit of $0.5 million coupled with reductions of $0.3 million in SG&A expenses.
Net loss for the six months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.5 million, or $0.10 per basic and diluted
share, as compared to net loss of $2.8 million, or $0.56 per basic and diluted share, for the six
months ended March 31, 2010. This represents a reduction in net loss of $2.3 million primarily due
to improved gross profit of $0.5 million and reductions of $0.4 million in SG&A expenses, as well
as both officer severance in the amount of $0.3 million and loss from discontinued operations of
$1.2 million recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2010 and not in the six months ended March
31, 2011
Potential Contractual Billing Adjustments
TeamStaff GS is seeking approval from the Federal government for gross profit on retroactive
billing rate increases associated with certain government contracts at which it had employees
staffed on contract assignments. These adjustments are due to changes in the contracted wage
determination rates for these contract employees. A wage determination is the listing of wage rates
and fringe benefit rates for each classification of laborers whom the Administrator of the Wage and
Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has determined to be prevailing in a given
locality. Contractors performing services for the Federal government under certain contracts are
required to pay service employees in various classes no less than the wage rates and fringe
benefits found prevailing in these localities. An audit by the DOL in 2008 at one of the facilities
revealed that notification, as required by contract, was not provided to TeamStaff GS in order to
effectuate the wage increases in a timely manner. Wages for contract employees on assignment at the
time have been adjusted prospectively to the prevailing rate and hourly billing rates to the DVA
have been increased accordingly. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, TeamStaff
recognized nonrecurring revenues of $10.8 million and direct costs of $10.1 million, based on
amounts that are contractually due under its arrangements with the Federal agencies. At March 31,
2011, the amount of the remaining accounts receivable with the DVA approximates $9.3 million and
the related accrued salary and benefits for direct costs approximates $8.7 million. The Company has
been and continues to be in discussions with representatives of the DVA regarding the matter and
anticipates resolution during fiscal 2011. In addition, TeamStaff is in the process of negotiating
a final amount related to gross profit on these adjustments. As such, there may be additional
revenues recognized in future periods once the approval for such additional amounts is obtained.
The ranges of additional revenue and gross profit are estimated to be between $0.4 million and $0.6
million. At present, the Company expects to collect such amounts during fiscal 2011 based on
current discussions and collection efforts. Because these amounts are subject to further government
review, no assurances can be given that we will indeed receive the amounts recorded as accounts
receivable, any additional billings from our government contracts or that if additional amounts are
received, that the amount will be within the range specified above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources; Commitments
At March 31, 2011, the Company had a net working capital deficit of approximately $3.7 million and
an accumulated deficit of approximately $61.6 million. The Company has a limited amount of cash and
equivalents at March 31, 2011 and will be required to rely on operating cash flow and periodic
funding, to the extent available, from its line of credit to sustain the operations of the Company
unless it elects to pursue and is successful in obtaining additional debt or equity funding.
24
Table of Contents
In an effort to improve our cash flows and financial position, we have recently taken measures
which are expected to enhance our liquidity by approximately $1,000,000 as a result of increasing
the maximum availability of our credit facility and receiving funding of and/or commitments for
additional equity and/or debt financing. As of February 14, 2011, our largest shareholder,
Wynnefield Capital, Inc., and certain of our directors and executive officers provided assurances
for future financings whereby they collectively agreed to provide up to $500,000 of additional
capital to us if we determine, prior to February 28, 2012, that such funds are required (the
Commitments). As described in Note 7 to the accompanying financial statements, $150,000 of such
capital was provided in cash on March 31, 2011 through the equity investments provided by members
of our board and management team. In addition, a further $75,000 of credits were granted by
certain
individuals against Company obligations due such persons. In addition, as described in greater
detail below, on February 9, 2011, we entered into a further amendment of our Loan Agreement with
Presidential Financial Corporation, pursuant to which they agreed to increase our maximum
availability under the Loan Agreement by an additional $500,000 and provide an unbilled receivable
facility within the limits of the Loan Agreement. Following this increase, the maximum availability
under this loan facility is $3,000,000; limited to eligible accounts receivable.
Management believes that: (a) cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.3 million as of March
31, 2011, (b) the available capital pursuant to the Commitments, (c) the amounts available under
its line of credit (which, in turn, is limited by the amount of eligible assets), (d) forecasted
operating cash flow, (e) the ultimate non-payment of certain liabilities we are currently
contesting (classified as current at March 31, 2011) in fiscal 2011, or the applicable portion of
2012 and (f) the effects of cost reduction programs and initiatives, will be sufficient to support
our operations for twelve months from the date of these financial statements. However, should any
of these factors not occur substantially as currently expected, there could be a material adverse
effect on our ability to access the level of liquidity necessary for us to sustain operations at
current levels for the next twelve months. In such an event, management may be forced to make
further reductions in spending or to further extend payment terms with suppliers, liquidate assets
where possible, and/or to suspend or curtail planned programs. Any of these actions could
materially harm our business, results of operations and future prospects.
Due to the foregoing and to address any need for additional capital, we intend to pursue equity,
equity-based and/or debt financing alternatives or other financing in order to raise needed funds.
While the remaining Commitments are unconditional, the specific terms of any financing which we may
request under the Commitments are subject to final negotiation among the parties and the approval
of members of our Board of Directors that are independent of the remaining other parties involved
in accordance with our policy for approving related-party transactions. Further, the transactions
will also be required to be structured in such a manner so as to comply with the listing
requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market. If we raise additional funds by selling shares of common
stock or convertible securities, the ownership of our existing shareholders will be diluted.
Further, if additional funds are raised though the issuance of equity or debt securities, such
additional securities may have powers, designations, preferences or rights senior to our currently
outstanding securities. Except for the remaining Commitments, we do not have any firm agreements
with any third-parties for such transactions and no assurances can be given that we will be
successful in raising any additions capital from financings, or that additional financing, if at
all available, can be obtained on acceptable terms to us. Any inability to obtain required
financing on sufficiently favorable terms could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity.
Cash from operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended March 31, 2011 was $1.1 million.
This decrease in cash was primarily driven by net loss, an increase in accounts receivable due to a
slowdown in cash collections that occurred during this period and a decrease in the accrued
expenses.
Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $.0.9 million.
This decrease in cash was primarily driven by net losses offset by an increase in accounts payable,
accrued payroll and accrued expenses.
Cash from investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2011 was $12,000 for costs
related to the purchase of fixed assets.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2010, included proceeds of
$375,000 on the disposal of Teamstaff RX, offset by $152,000 primarily for costs associated with
the purchase and implementation of a new computer operating systems for TeamStaff GS to fulfill
Defense Contract Audit Agency costs accounting system requirements for the award of certain larger
value government contracts.
25
Table of Contents
Cash from financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2011.
The increase is primarily the result of borrowing $1.1 million on the credit facility to fund
operations during the six months ended March 31, 2011 and the receipt of $150,000 cash proceeds
from the Commitments.
Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $0.1 million used
to pay off in full capital lease obligations related to the discontinued operation as well as
scheduled repayment of capital lease obligations for continuing operations.
Cash Flows
As of March 31, 2011, TeamStaff had cash and cash equivalents of $1.3 million and net accounts
receivable of $12.0 million. At March 31, 2011, the amount of the accounts receivable associated
with the DVA retroactive billings approximates $9.3 million and was unbilled at March 31, 2011. At
March 31, 2011 there was $1.5 million of debt outstanding under the Loan Agreement. As of September
30, 2010, there was $0.4 million of debt outstanding. Unused availability (as defined) totaled
$0.03 million and $0.6 million, at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, net of
required collateral reserves per the Loan Agreement for certain payroll and tax liabilities. The
average daily outstanding balance on the facility for the six months ended March 31, 2011 was $1.2
million. As of March 31, 2011, we had a working capital deficit of $3.7 million. The Company also
classifies a $1.5 million note payable related to the acquisition of RS Staffing Services as a
current liability (See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). However, the Company
plans to pursue its right of offset against the note for legal expenses incurred and has a good
faith belief that we will recover such amounts. The Company believes that it has adequate liquidity
resources to fund operations over the next twelve months in view of the additional funding
committed by the Companys Lender and other parties in February 2011 as discussed in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements.
Loan Facility
On July 29, 2010, TeamStaff GS entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan Agreement)
with Presidential Financial Corporation (the Lender). Under the Loan Agreement, the Lender agreed
to provide a two (2) year loan and security facility to TeamStaff GS in an aggregate amount of up
to $1.5 million, subject to the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement. In November 2010, the
Lender agreed, by means of an amendment to the Loan Agreement to increase the maximum amount
available under the facility from $1.5 million to $2.5 million (See Note 6). In February 2011 the
Company and Lender further increased the maximum availability under the Loan Agreement by an
additional $500,000 to $3.0 million and to provide an unbilled receivable facility within the
limits of the Loan Agreement. An interest rate premium of 2% is payable in respect of any advances
secured by unbilled accounts receivable, which are subject to a sub-facility limit of $500,000 and
an advance rate of 75%. The loan is secured by a security interest and lien on all of TeamStaff
GSs accounts, account deposits, letters of credit and investment property, chattel paper,
furniture, fixtures and equipment, instruments, investment property, general intangibles, deposit
accounts, inventory, other property, all proceeds and products of the foregoing (including proceeds
of any insurance policies and claims against third parties for loss of any of the foregoing) and
all books and records related thereto. TeamStaff GSs ability to request loan advances under the
Loan Agreement is subject to: (i) computation of TeamStaff GSs advance availability limit based on
eligible accounts receivables (as defined in the Loan Agreement) and subject to certain
requirements discussed in Note 6 multiplied by the Accounts Advance Rate established by the
Lender which initially shall be 85% and may be increased or decreased by the Lender in exercise of
its discretion; and (ii) compliance with the covenants and conditions of the loan. The loan was
initially for a term of 24 months and after giving effect to the February 2011 amendment, which
also extended the term of the Loan Agreement by 12 months, will mature on July 29, 2013.
Interest on the loan accrues on the daily unpaid balance of the loan advances secured by billed
receivables. Following the February 2011 amendment to the Loan Agreement, the interest rate under
the Loan and Security Agreement is the greater of: (a) 3.25% or (b)(i) 1.95% above the Wall Street
Journal Prime rate on the accounts receivable portion of the credit line and (ii) 3.95% above the
Wall Street Journal Prime rate on the unbilled accounts portion. The interest rate at March 31,
2011 was 5.2%. In addition, TeamStaff GS will pay certain other related fees and expense
reimbursements including a monthly service charge of 0.65% based on the average daily loan balance
which shall accrue daily and be due and payable on the last day of each month so long as the Loan
Agreement is outstanding. At March 31, 2011, the amount of the unused availability under the line
was $323,000. The amount outstanding as of March 31, 2011 was $1,474,000.
26
Table of Contents
The Loan Agreement requires compliance with customary covenants and contains restrictions on the
Companys ability to engage in certain transactions. Among other matters, under the Loan Agreement,
we may not, without consent of the Lender, (i) merge or consolidate with another entity, form any
new subsidiary or acquire any interest in a third party; (ii) acquire any assets except in the
ordinary course of business; (iii) enter into any transaction outside the ordinary course of
business; (iv) sell or transfer collateral; (v) make any loans to, or investments in, any affiliate
or enter into any transaction with an affiliate other than on an arms-length basis; (vi) incur any
debt outside the ordinary course of business; (vii) pay or declare any dividends or other
distributions; or (viii) redeem, retire or purchase any of our equity interests exceeding $50,000.
In addition, the Loan Agreement requires TeamStaff GS to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of
at least $1,000,000 on a trailing 12-month basis. Further, without the consent of the Lender, the
Company is also restricted from making any payments in respect of other outstanding indebtedness.
The Lender may terminate the Loan Agreement at any time upon 60 days written notice after February
29, 2012 and the Loan Agreement provides for customary events of default following which the Lender
may, at its option, terminate the loan agreement and accelerate the repayment of any amount
outstanding. The defined events of default include, among other things, a material adverse change
in the Companys circumstances, or if the Lender deems itself insecure in the ability of the
Company to repay its
obligations, or as to the sufficiency of the collateral.
As part of the February 2011 amendment, the Lender also agreed to waive the Companys
non-compliance with the covenant under the Loan Agreement to furnish them with a copy of TeamStaff
GS financial statements within 90 days after the end of its fiscal year. In addition to granting
this waiver, the Lender also agreed to modify this covenant to require that the Company provide
them, within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, audited consolidated financial statements
of the Company and its subsidiaries as of the end of such fiscal year and, in addition, at the same
time, furnish consolidating income statement and balance sheet schedules, including a
reconciliation with TeamStaff GSs financial information.
TeamStaff has concurrently executed a Corporate Guaranty Agreement with Lender pursuant to which it
has guaranteed all of the obligations of Teamstaff GS under the Loan Agreement.
Under the Loan Agreement our customers make payments directly to a bank account controlled by our
Lender over which we have no control and which is used to pay down our loans. As a result, our
access to cash resources is substantially at the discretion of the Lender and could cease in the
event of a default on our Loan Agreement.
Payroll Taxes
As described in greater detail in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, TeamStaff had
received notices from IRS claiming taxes, interest and penalties due related to payroll taxes
predominantly from its former PEO operations which were sold in fiscal 2003. TeamStaff has also
received notices from the IRS reporting overpayments of taxes. Management believes that these
notices are predominantly the result of misapplication of payroll tax payments between its legal
entities. If not resolved favorably, the Company may incur interest and penalties. To date,
TeamStaff has been working with the IRS to resolve these discrepancies and has had certain interest
and penalty claims abated. TeamStaff has also received notices from the Social Security
Administration claiming variances in wage reporting compared to IRS transcripts. TeamStaff believes
the notices from the Social Security Administration are directly related to the IRS notices
received. TeamStaff believes that after the IRS applies all the funds correctly, any significant
interest and penalties will be abated; however, there can be no assurance that each of these
matters will be resolved favorably. In settling various years for specific subsidiaries with the
IRS, the Company has received refunds for those specific periods; however, as the process of
settling and concluding on other periods and subsidiaries is not yet completed and the potential
exists for related penalties and interest, the remaining liability ($1.2 million at March 31, 2011)
has been recorded in accounts payable. Management believes that the ultimate resolution of these
remaining payroll tax matters will not have a significant adverse effect on its financial position
or future results of operations.
27
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
Contractual | Payments Due By Period | |||||||||||||||
Obligations | Less than | 1-3 | 4-5 | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | Total | 1 Year | Years | Years | ||||||||||||
Debt (1) |
$ | 2,991 | $ | 2,987 | $ | 4 | $ | | ||||||||
Operating Leases (2) |
595 | 266 | 291 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Total Obligations |
$ | 3,586 | $ | 3,253 | $ | 295 | $ | 38 | ||||||||
(1) | Represents the maximum amount of notes payable related to the acquisition of
TeamStaff GS, and capital lease obligations. |
|
(2) | Represents lease payments net of sublease income, including those of discontinued operations. |
Employment Agreements
On December 1, 2010, the Company named John F. Armstrong as our Executive Vice President of
Corporate Development. On February 7, 2011, the Company and Mr. Armstrong entered into an
employment agreement. The following is a description of the terms of employment agreed upon by the
Company and Mr. Armstrong. Mr. Armstrongs appointment as Executive Vice President of Corporate
Development commenced December 1, 2010 and the employment agreement will expire on November 30,
2013. Mr. Armstrong will receive an initial base salary of $215,000 per annum. Mr. Armstrong may
receive an annual bonus of up to 50% of base salary based on performance targets and other key
objectives established by the Management Resources and Compensation Committee of the board of
directors. Target bonus will be adjusted by 2% of base salary for every 1% of variance between
targets and actual results and no bonus will be awarded if results are less than 90% of target and
no bonus will exceed 70% of base salary. For the Companys 2011 fiscal year, $40,000 of the
potential bonus will be guaranteed provided Mr. Armstrong remains employed as of the date on which
the bonus payment is made. The Company granted Mr. Armstrong options to purchase 250,000 shares of
common stock under our 2006 Plan. The options vested or shall vest as follows: 50,000 options
vested immediately; 100,000 options shall vest if the closing price of the Companys common stock
equals or exceeds $3.00 per share for ten consecutive trading days; an additional 50,000 options
shall vest if the closing price of the Companys common stock equals or exceeds $5.00 per share for
ten consecutive trading days; and an additional 50,000 options shall vest if the closing price of
the Companys common stock equals or exceeds $7.00 per share for ten consecutive trading days. The
options, to the extent vested, shall be exercisable for a period of ten years at the per share
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date his
employment commenced.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for
the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating parts of our business that are not
consolidated into our financial statements. We do not have any arrangements or relationships with
entities that are not consolidated into our financial statements that are reasonably likely to
materially affect our liquidity or the availability of our capital resources. We have entered into
various agreements by which we may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to
certain matters. Generally, these indemnification provisions are included in contracts arising in
the normal course of business under which we customarily agree to hold the indemnified party
harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations related to such matters as
intellectual property rights. Payments by us under such indemnification clauses are generally
conditioned on the other party making a claim. Such claims are generally subject to challenge by us
and to dispute resolution procedures specified in the particular contract. Further, our obligations
under these arrangements may be limited in terms of time and/or amount and, in some instances, we
may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by us. It is not possible to
predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnification agreements due
to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts of each particular agreement.
Historically, we have not made any payments under these agreements that have been material
individually or in the aggregate. As of our most recent fiscal year end we were not aware of any
obligations under such indemnification agreements that would require material payments.
28
Table of Contents
Effects of Inflation
Inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on TeamStaffs net revenues and
results of operations, as TeamStaff has been able to modify its prices and cost structure to
respond to inflation and changing prices.
ITEM 3: | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
TeamStaff does not undertake trading practices in securities or other financial instruments and
therefore does not have any material exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate
risk, commodity price risk or other similar risks, which might otherwise result from such
practices. TeamStaff is not materially subject to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, commodity
prices or other market rates or prices from market sensitive instruments. TeamStaff has a material
interest rate risk with respect to our prior workers compensation programs. In connection with
TeamStaffs prior workers compensation programs, prepayments of future claims were deposited into
trust funds for possible future payments of these claims in accordance with the policies. The
interest income resulting from these prepayments is for the benefit of TeamStaff, and is used to
offset workers compensation expense. If interest rates in these periods decrease, TeamStaffs
workers compensation expense would increase because TeamStaff would be entitled to less interest
income on the deposited funds. Further, and as discussed elsewhere in this filing, TeamStaff, Inc.,
effective in July 29, 2010, interest on our revolving credit facility accrues on the daily unpaid
balance of the loan advances secured by billed receivables. Following the February 2011 amendment
to this arrangement, the applicable interest rate is the greater of (a) 3.25% or (b)(i) 1.95% above
the Wall Street Journal Prime rate on the accounts receivable portion of the credit line and (ii)
3.95% above the Wall Street Journal Prime rate on the unbilled accounts portion. The interest rate
at March 31, 2011 was 5.2%. An interest rate premium of 2% is payable in respect of any advances
secured by unbilled accounts receivable, which are subject to a sub-facility limit of $500,000 and
an advance rate of 75%. In addition, TeamStaff GS will pay certain other related fees and expense
reimbursements including a monthly service charge of 0.65% based on the average daily loan balance
which shall accrue daily and be due and payable on the last day of each month so long as the Loan
Agreement is outstanding. Material increases in the Prime rate could have an adverse effect on our
results of operations, the status of the revolving credit facility as well as interest costs.
ITEM 4: | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our CEO and President and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report, has concluded that, based on the
evaluation of these controls and procedures, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and President and Chief
Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, including our CEO and President and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that
our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. Our management, however,
believes our disclosure controls and procedures are in fact effective to provide reasonable
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Companys fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
29
Table of Contents
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
RS Staffing Services, Inc.
On April 17, 2007, a Federal Grand Jury subpoena was issued by the Northern District of Illinois to
the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, TeamStaff GS, formerly known as RS Staffing Services,
requesting production of certain documents dating back to 1997, prior to the time the Company
acquired RS Staffing Services. The subpoena stated that it was issued in connection with an
investigation of possible violations of Federal criminal laws and related crimes concerning
procurement at the DVA. According to the cover letter accompanying the subpoena, the U.S.
Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (DOJ), along with the DVA, Office of the Inspector
General, are responsible for the current criminal investigation. RS Staffing Services provides
contract staffing at certain DVA hospitals that may be part of the investigation. The return date
for documents called for by the subpoena was May 17, 2007. In connection with the same
investigation, agents with the DVA, Office of Inspector General, executed a search warrant at the
Monroe, Georgia offices of RS Staffing Services.
The government has advised TeamStaff that the DOJ has no intent to charge TeamStaff or any of its
subsidiaries or employees in connection with the Federal investigation of contract practices at
various government owned/contractor operated facilities. TeamStaff remains committed to cooperate
with the DOJs investigation of other parties.
The Company originally acquired RS Staffing Services in June 2005. As part of the purchase price of
the acquisition, the Company issued to the former owners of RS Staffing Services; (i) a $3.0
million promissory note, of which $1.5 million in principal and interest of $150,000 was paid in
June 2006 (ii) and common stock in the Company. On May 31, 2007, the Company sent a notice of
indemnification claim to the former owners for costs that have been incurred in connection with the
investigation. Effective June 1, 2007, the Company and former owners of RS Staffing Services
reached an agreement to extend the due date from June 8, 2007 to December 31, 2008 with respect to
the remaining $1.5 million principal payable and accrued interest payable. Such agreement was
extended to August 31, 2010, but has not been further renewed. As of March 31, 2011, the amount has
not been settled and negotiations with the former owners of RS Staffing Services are as yet to be
resolved. The Company recognized expenses related to legal representation and costs incurred in
connection with the investigation and dispute in the amount of $40,000 and $56,000 in the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and $59,000 and $57,000 in the six months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively, as a component of other income (expense). Cumulative costs related to
this matter approximate $1.8 million. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement with RS Staffing
Services, the Company has notified the former owners of RS Staffing Services that it is the
Companys intention to exercise its right to set-off the payment of such expenses against the
remaining principal and accrued interest due to the former owners of RS Staffing Services. The
former owners of RS Staffing Services have notified the Company of their disagreement with the
Companys course of action and of the alleged existence of partial counter-claims based on the
Companys alleged failure to permit them to transfer certain shares of the Companys stock at a
time when the Companys per share price was higher than its current per share price. The parties
have unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate a settlement and the claimants have indicated their
intention to proceed to mediation, as provided for in the stock purchase agreement.
The Company will pursue the recovery as a right of offset in future periods. Management has a good
faith belief that the Company will recover such amounts; however, generally accepted accounting
principles preclude the Company from recording an offset to the note payable to the former owners
of RS Staffing Services until the final amount of the claim is settled and determinable. At
present, no assurances can be given that the former owners of RS Staffing Services would not pursue
action against us or that the Company will be successful in the offset of such amounts against the
outstanding debt and accrued interest from notice date forward, if any, or in defending the partial
counter-claims. Accordingly, the Company has expensed costs incurred related to the investigation
through March 31, 2011.
Other Matters
As a commercial enterprise and employer, we are subject to various claims and legal actions in the
ordinary course of business. These matters can include professional liability, employment-relations
issues, workers compensation, tax, payroll and employee-related matters and inquiries and
investigations by governmental agencies regarding our employment practices. We are not aware of any
pending or threatened litigation that we believe is reasonably likely to have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In connection with its medical staffing business, TeamStaff is exposed to potential liability for
the acts, errors or omissions of its temporary medical employees. The professional liability
insurance policy provides up to $5.0 million aggregate coverage with a $2.0 million per occurrence
limit. Although TeamStaff believes the liability insurance is reasonable under the circumstances to
protect it from liability for such claims, there can be no assurance that such insurance will be
adequate to cover all potential claims.
TeamStaff is engaged in no other litigation, which would be anticipated to have a material adverse
impact on TeamStaffs results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
30
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A: | RISK FACTORS |
Our operating results and financial condition have varied in the past and may in the future vary
significantly depending on a number of factors. In addition to the other information set forth in
this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in the Risk Factors section in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 for a discussion of the risks
associated with our business, financial condition and results of operations. These factors, among
others, could have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations, financial
condition or liquidity and cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in
statements made in this report and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. The risks
identified by TeamStaff in its reports are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may
materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
We believe there have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
ITEM 2: | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
As previously reported, on March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement
(the Purchase Agreement) with a limited number of accredited investors pursuant to which
the Company sold an aggregate of $225,000 of shares of its Common Stock to such persons in a
private transaction (the Equity Investment). The purchasers participating in the transaction are
members of the Companys Board of Directors and management team (the Purchasers).
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold to the Purchasers a total of 459,181 shares of
its Common Stock. The transaction closed on March 31, 2011. Of this amount, the Company received
$150,000 in total cash proceeds for the purchase of the shares of Common Stock and three of the
purchasers, agreed with the Company to pay the purchase price for the shares of Common Stock by
granting an offsetting credit to the Company for an amount equal to the purchase price and
authorizing the Company to apply such credit against any obligation of the Company to such person
within twelve months of the closing date, except for base salary. The aggregate amount of such
credits totaled $75,000. The Company intends to use these proceeds for general working capital.
The value ascribed to the shares issued in the Equity Investment was based on the fair value of the Companys common stock on March 31, 2011.
Based in part upon the representations of the Purchasers in the Purchase Agreement, the shares of
Common Stock were offered and sold in a private placement to accredited investors (as such term is
defined in Rule 501(a), as promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended), without
registration under the Securities Act and the securities laws of certain states, in reliance on the
exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and similar exemptions under applicable
state laws. The securities sold in the Equity Investment may not be offered or sold in the United
States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
ITEM 3: | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
We have entered into a Loan Agreement with Presidential Financial Corporation (Lender) which
requires compliance with customary covenants and restrictions on our ability to, among other
things, dispose of certain assets, engage in certain transactions, incur indebtedness and pay
dividends, and TeamStaff GSs tangible net worth. As part of the amendment to the Loan Agreement we
entered into with the Lender on February 9, 2011, the Lender agreed to waive our non-compliance
with the covenant under the Loan Agreement to furnish them with a copy of TeamStaff GS financial
statements within 90 days after the end of its fiscal year.
ITEM 4: | REMOVED AND RESERVED |
ITEM 5: | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 6: | EXHIBITS |
The exhibits designated with an asterisk (*) are filed herewith. All other exhibits have been
previously filed with the Commission and, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. Secs. 201.24 and 240.12b-32, are
incorporated by reference to the document referenced in brackets following the descriptions of such
exhibits. The exhibits designated with a number sign (#) indicate a management contract or
compensation plan or arrangement.
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.1 | # | Employment Agreement between the Company and John F. Armstrong, dated February 7, 2011 (filed as Exhibit
10.34 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010). |
||
10.2 | Third Amendment to Secured Promissory Note and Loan and Security Agreement with Presidential Financial
Corporation dated February 9, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010). |
|||
10.3 | * | Form of Subscription Agreement |
||
10.4 | * | Form of Subscription Agreement |
||
31.1 | * | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) or 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a). |
||
31.2 | * | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) or 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a). |
||
32.1 | * | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or
17 CFR 240.15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
32
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
TEAMSTAFF, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ Zachary C. Parker | |||
Zachary C. Parker | ||||
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
By: | /s/ John E. Kahn | |||
John E. Kahn | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Dated: May 16, 2011
33