Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
☑
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
OR
☐
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from
to
Commission
file number 000-50621
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida
|
|
86-0787790
|
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
2151 LeJeune Road, Suite 150 – Mezzanine, Coral Gables,
Florida 33134
(Address of
principal executive offices, including zip code)
(305) 774-0407
(Registrant’s
telephone number)
_________________________________________________________________
(Former Name,
Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last
Report)
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
☑ No ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting company” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Smaller reporting
company
|
☑
|
Emerging growth
company
|
☐
|
If an emerging
growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has
elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by a check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No
☑
The number of
shares of common stock outstanding was 18,815,203 as of August 21,
2017.
DOLPHIN
ENTERTAINMENT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
PART
I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017
(unaudited) and December 31, 2016
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June
30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 (unaudited)
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
62
|
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
ITEM I – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
||
(unaudited)
|
||
|
||
ASSETS
|
As of
June 30,
2017
|
As of
December 31,
2016
|
Current
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$1,071,813
|
$662,546
|
Restricted
cash
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
Accounts
receivable, net of $251,000 of allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
5,992,899
|
3,668,646
|
Other
current assets
|
511,920
|
2,665,781
|
Total
Current Assets
|
7,576,632
|
8,246,973
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
2,626,461
|
4,654,013
|
Intangible
assets, net of $249,333 of amortization
|
8,860,667
|
-
|
Goodwill
|
14,336,919
|
-
|
Property,
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
1,071,706
|
35,188
|
Investments
|
220,000
|
-
|
Deposits
|
852,509
|
1,261,067
|
Total
Assets
|
$35,544,894
|
$14,197,241
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$1,627,478
|
$677,249
|
Other
current liabilities
|
4,973,500
|
2,958,523
|
Line
of credit
|
750,000
|
-
|
Put
Rights
|
750,343
|
-
|
Warrant
liability
|
-
|
14,011,254
|
Accrued
compensation
|
2,375,000
|
2,250,000
|
Debt
|
12,892,544
|
18,743,069
|
Loan
from related party
|
1,818,659
|
684,326
|
Deferred
revenue
|
20,303
|
46,681
|
Note
payable
|
850,000
|
300,000
|
Total
current liabilities
|
26,057,827
|
39,671,102
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Warrant
liability
|
4,170,677
|
6,393,936
|
Put
Rights
|
3,149,657
|
-
|
Contingent
consideration
|
3,743,000
|
-
|
Note
payable
|
400,000
|
-
|
Other
noncurrent liabilities
|
1,048,293
|
-
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
12,511,627
|
6,393,936
|
Total
Liabilities
|
38,569,454
|
46,065,038
|
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.015 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized, 18,690,792
and 14,395,521, respectively, issued and outstanding at June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016.
|
280,363
|
215,933
|
Preferred
Stock, Series C, $0.001 par value, 50,000, 50,000 at June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
93,103,658
|
67,727,474
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(96,409,581)
|
(99,812,204)
|
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
$(3,024,560)
|
$(31,867,797)
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
$35,544,894
|
$14,197,241
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
3
DOLPHIN ENTERTAINMENT INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||
|
||||
|
For the
three months ended
|
For the
six months ended
|
||
|
June
30
|
June
30
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
Production
and distribution
|
$2,694,096
|
$4,000
|
$3,226,962
|
$4,157
|
Entertainment
Publicity
|
5,137,556
|
-
|
5,137,556
|
-
|
Membership
|
-
|
3,750
|
-
|
21,028
|
Total
revenues
|
7,831,652
|
7,750
|
8,364,518
|
25,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
costs
|
2,070,529
|
-
|
2,500,772
|
2,429
|
Distribution
and marketing
|
559,210
|
-
|
629,493
|
-
|
Payroll
|
3,466,157
|
363,756
|
3,802,511
|
751,202
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,020,807
|
523,014
|
1,213,400
|
562,576
|
Legal
and professional
|
621,369
|
394,358
|
997,434
|
967,531
|
Total
Expenses
|
7,738,072
|
1,281,128
|
9,143,610
|
2,283,738
|
Income
(Loss) before other expenses
|
93,580
|
(1,273,378)
|
(779,092)
|
(2,258,553)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expenses)
|
(16,000)
|
-
|
(16,000)
|
9,660
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
(249,333)
|
-
|
(249,333)
|
-
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
(4,167)
|
(4,652,443)
|
(4,167)
|
(5,843,811)
|
Acquisition
costs
|
(207,564)
|
-
|
(745,272)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
(533,812)
|
-
|
6,289,513
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of put rights
|
(100,000)
|
-
|
(100,000)
|
-
|
Loss
on disposal of furniture, office equipment and leasehold
improvements
|
(28,025)
|
-
|
(28,025)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of contingent consideration
|
(116,000)
|
-
|
(116,000)
|
-
|
Interest
expense
|
(396,864)
|
(1,778,111)
|
(849,001)
|
(3,155,076)
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
(1,558,185)
|
(7,703,932)
|
3,402,623
|
(11,247,780)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
$-
|
$937
|
$-
|
$5,257
|
Net
loss attributable to Dolphin Entertainment, Inc.
|
(1,558,185)
|
(7,704,869)
|
3,402,623
|
(11,253,037)
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$(7,703,932)
|
$3,402,623
|
$(11,247,780)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(Loss) per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.08)
|
$(1.76)
|
$0.21
|
$(2.72)
|
Diluted
|
$(0.08)
|
$(1.76)
|
$(0.15)
|
$(2.72)
|
Weighted
average number of shares used in per share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
18,672,778
|
7,340,942
|
16,586,685
|
6,050,896
|
Diluted
|
18,672,778
|
7,340,942
|
19,085,691
|
6,050,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
4
DOLPHIN
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
||
(Unaudited)
|
||
|
||
|
For the six
months ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$3,402,623
|
$(11,247,780)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
77,977
|
11,316
|
Amortization of
intangible assets
|
249,333
|
-
|
Amortization of
capitalized production costs
|
2,049,913
|
-
|
Impairment of
capitalized production costs
|
-
|
2,439
|
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
|
4,167
|
5,843,811
|
Loss on disposal of
fixed assets
|
28,024
|
-
|
Bad
debt
|
16,000
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of warrant liability
|
(6,289,513)
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of put rights
|
100,000
|
-
|
Change in fair
value of contingent consideration
|
116,000
|
-
|
Change in deferred
rent
|
434,353
|
-
|
Changes in
operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
-
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(633,609)
|
870,550
|
Other current
assets
|
2,153,861
|
-
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
-
|
69,766
|
Capitalized
production costs
|
(22,361)
|
(123,177)
|
Deposits
|
454,121
|
-
|
Deferred
revenue
|
(26,378)
|
-
|
Accrued
compensation
|
125,000
|
60,000
|
Accounts
payable
|
883,137
|
(1,370,875)
|
Other current
liabilities
|
(355,923)
|
3,597,441
|
Other noncurrent
liabilities
|
(41,120)
|
-
|
Net Cash Provided
by (Used in) Operating Activities
|
2,725,605
|
(2,286,509)
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
1,250,000
|
-
|
Purchase of fixed
assets
|
(54,558)
|
-
|
Acquisition of
42West, net of cash acquired
|
13,626
|
-
|
Net Cash Provided
by Investing Activities
|
1,209,068
|
-
|
CASH FLOWS FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
Proceeds from loan
and security agreements
|
-
|
(405,000)
|
Repayment of loan
and security agreements
|
-
|
-
|
Sale of common
stock
|
500,000
|
6,225,000
|
Proceeds from line
of credit
|
750,000
|
-
|
Proceeds from note
payable
|
950,000
|
-
|
Repayment of
debt
|
(5,850,525)
|
-
|
Proceeds from the
exercise of warrants
|
35,100
|
-
|
Exercise of put
rights
|
(700,000)
|
-
|
Advances from
related party
|
1,297,000
|
-
|
Repayment to
related party
|
(506,981)
|
(961,324)
|
Net Cash Provided
by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
(3,525,406)
|
4,858,676
|
NET INCREASE IN
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
409,267
|
2,572,167
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
662,546
|
2,392,685
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$1,071,813
|
$4,964,852
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
$3,333
|
$749,249
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
Conversion of
related party debt and interest to shares of common
stock
|
$-
|
$3,073,410
|
Conversion of debt
into shares of common stock
|
$-
|
$3,164,000
|
Conversion of loan
and security agreements, including interest, into shares of common
stock
|
$-
|
$20,434,858
|
Issuance of shares
of Common Stock related to the 42West Acquisition
|
$15,030,767
|
$-
|
Liability for
contingent consideration for the 42West Acquisition
|
$3,743,000
|
$-
|
Liability for put
rights to the Sellers of 42West
|
$3,900,000
|
$-
|
Liabilities assumed
in the 42West Acquisition
|
$1,011,000
|
$-
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
5
DOLPHIN
ENTERTAINMENT, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
Deficit
|
|||||||
For
the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
Total
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders
|
||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
December 31, 2016
|
1,000,000
|
$1,000
|
14,395,521
|
$215,933
|
$67,727,474
|
$(99,812,204)
|
$(31,867,797)
|
Net income
for the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,402,623
|
3,402,623
|
Sale
of common stock during the six months ended June 30,
2017
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
1,500
|
498,500
|
-
|
500,000
|
Issuance
of shares from partial exercise of Warrant E and exercise of all of
Warrants J and K
|
-
|
-
|
2,665,770
|
39,987
|
9,940,113
|
-
|
9,980,100
|
Issuance
of shares for payment of services
|
|
|
6,508
|
98
|
34,069
|
|
34,167
|
Issuance
of shares related to acquisition of 42West
|
-
|
-
|
1,674,830
|
25,123
|
15,601,224
|
-
|
15,626,347
|
Shares
retired from exercise of puts
|
|
|
(151,837)
|
(2,278)
|
(697,722)
|
|
(700,000)
|
Balance
June 30, 2017
|
1,000,000
|
$1,000
|
18,690,792
|
$280,363
|
$93,103,658
|
$(96,409,581)
|
$(3,024,560)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
|
6
DOLPHIN
ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
JUNE
30, 2017
NOTE
1 – GENERAL
Nature of Operations
Dolphin
Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company,”
“Dolphin,” “we,” “us” or
“our”), formerly Dolphin Digital Media, Inc., is a
producer of original high-quality digital programming for online
consumption and is committed to delivering premium, best-in-class
entertainment and securing premiere distribution partners to
maximize audience reach and commercial advertising potential. On
March 7, 2016, the Company completed its merger with Dolphin Films,
Inc., an entity under common control. Dolphin Films, Inc.
(“Dolphin Films”) is a motion picture studio focused on
storytelling on a global scale for young, always-connected
audiences. On March 30, 2017, the Company acquired 42West, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“42West”). 42West
is an entertainment public relations agency offering talent
publicity, strategic communications and entertainment content
marketing. Dolphin also currently operates online kids clubs,
however it intends to discontinue the online kids clubs at the end
of 2017 to dedicate its time and resources to the entertainment
publicity business and the production of feature films and digital
content.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Dolphin, and all of its majority-owned and controlled
subsidiaries, including Dolphin Films, Inc., Dolphin Kids Clubs,
LLC, Cybergeddon Productions, LLC, Dolphin SB Productions LLC,
Dolphin Max Steel Holdings LLC, Dolphin JB Believe Financing, LLC,
Dolphin JOAT Productions, LLC and 42West.
Effective March 7,
2016, the Company acquired Dolphin Films from Dolphin
Entertainment, LLC. (“DE LLC”), a company wholly owned
by William O’Dowd, CEO, President and Chairman of the Board
of Dolphin. At the time of the acquisition, Mr. O’Dowd was
also the majority shareholder of Dolphin. The acquisition from DE
LLC was a transfer between entities under common control. As such,
the Company recorded the assets, liabilities and deficit of Dolphin
Films on its consolidated balance sheets at DE LLC’s
historical basis instead of fair value. Transfers of businesses
between entities under common control require prior periods to be
retrospectively adjusted to furnish comparative information.
Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements and related
notes of the Company have been retrospectively adjusted to include
the historical balances of DE LLC’s prior to the effective
date of the acquisition.
On May 9, 2016, the
Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with
the Secretary of State of the State of Florida to effectuate a
20-to-1 reverse stock split. The reverse stock split was approved
by the Board of Directors and a majority of the Company’s
shareholders and became effective May 10, 2016. The number of
common shares in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and all related footnotes has been adjusted to
retrospectively reflect the reverse stock split.
On March 30, 2017,
the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
(the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company
and Leslee Dart, Amanda Lundberg, Allan Mayer and the Beatrice B.
Trust (the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, the Company acquired from the Sellers 100% of the
membership interests of 42West and 42West became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company (the “42West Acquisition”).
The consideration paid by the Company in connection with the 42West
Acquisition was approximately $18.7 million in shares of common
stock of the Company, par value $0.015 (the “Common
Stock”), based on the Company’s 30-trading-day average
stock price prior to the closing date of $4.61 per share (less
certain working capital and closing adjustments, transaction
expenses and payments of indebtedness), plus the potential to earn
up to an additional $9.3 million in shares of Common Stock based on
achieving certain financial targets. See note 4 for additional
information regarding the acquisition.
On June 29, 2017,
the shareholders approved a change in the name of the Company to
Dolphin Entertainment, Inc. The Company filed the amended and
restated articles of incorporation with the State of Florida on
July 6, 2017 to reflect the name change.
7
The Company enters
into relationships or investments with other entities, and in
certain instances, the entity in which the Company has a
relationship or investment may qualify as a variable interest
entity (“VIE”). A VIE is consolidated in the financial
statements if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary
of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party that has the power
to direct activities that most significantly impact the activities
of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. The Company has included Max Steel Productions, LLC formed on
July 8, 2013 in the State of Florida and JB Believe, LLC formed on
December 4, 2012 in the State of Florida in its combined financial
statements as VIE’s.
The unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim
financial information and the instructions to quarterly report on
Form 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”), as amended, and Article 8 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s
management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
reflected in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements. Operating results for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. The
balance sheet at December 31, 2016 has been derived from the
audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all
the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete
financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read together with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. The most significant estimates made by
management in the preparation of the financial statements relate to
ultimate revenue and costs for investment in digital and feature
film projects; estimates of sales returns and other allowances and
provisions for doubtful accounts and impairment assessments for
investment in digital and feature film projects. Actual results
could differ from such estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09
—Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
(“ASU 2014-09”), which provides guidance for revenue
recognition. This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition
requirements in ASC Topic 605, and most industry specific guidance,
and replace it with a new Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Topic 606. The FASB has also issued several
subsequent ASUs which amend ASU 2014-09. The amendments do not
change the core principle of the guidance in ASC 606.
The core principle
of ASC 606 is that revenue is recognized when promised goods or
services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects
the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core
principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
Step 1: Identify
the contract(s) with a customer
Step 2: Identify
the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3: Determine
the transaction price.
Step 4: Allocate
the transaction price to the performance obligations in the
contract.
Step 5: Recognize
revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance
obligation.
8
The guidance in ASU
2014-09 also specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or
fulfill a contract with a customer. ASC 606 will require the
Company to make significant judgments and estimates. ASC 606 also
requires more extensive disclosures regarding the nature, amount,
timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from
contracts with customers.
Public business
entities are required to apply the guidance of ASC 606 to annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (2018 for the
Company), including interim reporting periods within that reporting
period. Accordingly, the Company will adopt ASU 606 in the first
quarter of 2018.
ASC 606 requires an
entity to apply ASC 606 using one of the following two transition
methods:
1.
Retrospective
approach: Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented
and the entity may elect certain practical expedients.
2.
Modified
retrospective approach: Retrospectively with the cumulative effect
of initially applying ASC 606 recognized at the date of initial
application. If an entity elects this transition method it also is
required to provide the additional disclosures in reporting periods
that include the date of initial application of (a) the amount by
which each financial statement line item is affected in the current
reporting period by the application ASU 606 as compared to the
guidance that was in effect before the change, and (b) an
explanation of the reasons for significant changes.
The Company expects
that it will adopt ASC 606 following the modified retrospective
approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the
adoption of this new guidance. While there may be additional areas
impacted by the new standard, the Company has identified certain
areas that may be impacted as follows:
Variable Consideration: The Company is
entitled to royalties from certain international distributors based
on the sales made by these distributors after recoupment of a
minimum guarantee. The Company is also entitled to certain bonus
payments if certain of their clients receive awards as specified in
the engagement contracts. Under the new revenue recognition rules,
revenues will be recorded based on best estimates available in the
period of sales or usage. The Company is evaluating the impact, if
any, of recognizing the variable consideration.
Principal vs. Agent: The new standard
includes new guidance as to how to determine whether the Company is
acting as a principal, in which case revenue would be recognized on
a gross basis, or whether the Company is acting as an agent, in
which case revenues would be recognized on a net basis. The Company
is currently evaluating whether the new principal versus agent
guidance will have an impact (i.e., changing from gross to net
recognition or from net to gross recognition) under certain of its
distribution arrangements.
The Company is
continuing to evaluate the impact of the new standard on its
consolidated financial statements for the above areas and other
areas of revenue recognition, particularly as it pertains to its
new subsidiary, 42West.
In November 2015,
the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740) regarding
balance sheet classification of deferred income taxes. ASU 2015-17
simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes by requiring deferred
tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the
balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for public companies for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (2017
for the Company), and interim periods within those fiscal years.
The guidance may be adopted prospectively or retrospectively and
early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2015-17 did not have
an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In February 2016,
The FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 642) intended to improve
financial reporting about leasing transactions. The ASU affects all
companies and other organizations that lease assets such as real
estate, airplanes, and manufacturing equipment. The ASU will
require organizations that lease assets—referred to as
“lessees”—to recognize on the balance sheet the
assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by
those leases. Under the new guidance, a lease will be required to
recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of
more than 12 months. Consistent with current Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP), the recognition, measurement, and
presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a
lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or
operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP—which requires
only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet
–the new ASU will require both types of leases to be
recognized on the balance sheet. The ASU also will require
disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users
better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows
arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and
quantitative requirements, providing additional information about
the amounts recorded in the financial statements.
9
ASU 2016-02 will
take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15,
2018 (2019 for the Company). For all other organizations, the ASU
on leases will take effect for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application will be
permitted for all organizations. The Company is currently reviewing
the impact that implementing this ASU will have.
In August 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which
addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented
and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU will be
effective on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (2018
for the Company), and interim periods within those years, with
early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe that
adoption of this new guidance will have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016,
the FASB issued ASU 2016-17 —Consolidation (Topic 810):
Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common
Control. The update amends the consolidation guidance on how
VIE’s should treat indirect interest in the entity held
through related parties. The ASU will be effective on a
retrospective or modified retrospective basis for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (2017 for the Company),
and interim periods within those years, with early adoption
permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-17 did not have an effect on
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2016,
the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU
2016-18 provides guidance on the classification of restricted cash
and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. Although it
does not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash
equivalents, it states that amounts generally described as
restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included
with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the
beginning-of-period and end-of period total amounts shown on the
statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The
Company does not currently expect the adoption of this new standard
to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2017,
the FASB issued guidance to simplify the accounting for goodwill
impairment. The guidance removes the second step of the goodwill
impairment test, which requires that a hypothetical purchase price
allocation be performed to determine the amount of impairment, if
any. Under this new guidance, a goodwill impairment charge will be
based on the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value
exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of
goodwill. The guidance is effective for the Company's fiscal year
beginning April 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted for interim
or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates
after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted the new guidance
effective January 1, 2017, with no material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2017, FASB
issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings per Share (Topic 260),
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and
Hedging (Topic 815). ASU 2017-11 consists of two parts. The
amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification
analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or
embedded features) with down round features. When determining
whether certain financial instruments should be classified as
liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer
precludes equity classification when assessing whether the
instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The
amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for
equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding
equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option)
no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair
value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. For
freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the
amendments require entities that present earnings per share (EPS)
in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down
round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a
dividend and as a reduction of income available to common
shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded
conversion options that have down round features are now subject to
the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion
features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and
Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The
amendments in Part II of this Update re-characterize the indefinite
deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented
as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those
amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business
entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for
all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity
early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments
should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that
includes that interim period. The amendments in Part II of this
Update do not require any transition guidance because those
amendments do not have an accounting effect The Company is
currently reviewing the impact that implementing this ASU will
have.
10
NOTE
2 — GOING CONCERN
The accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. which contemplate the continuation of the
Company as a going concern. The Company has a net loss of
$1,558,185 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and net income
of $3,402,623 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Although the
Company had net income for the six months ended June 30, 2017, it
was primarily due to a change in the fair value of the warrant
liability. Furthermore, the Company has recorded accumulated
deficit of $96,409,581 as of June 30, 2017. The Company has a
working capital deficit of $ 18,481,195 and therefore does not have
adequate capital to fund its obligations as they come due or to
maintain or develop its operations. The Company is dependent upon
funds from private investors and support of certain stockholders.
If the Company is unable to obtain funding from these sources
within the next 12 months, it could be forced to
liquidate.
These factors raise
substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a
going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
these uncertainties. In this regard, management is planning to
raise any necessary additional funds through loans and additional
issuance of its Common Stock, securities convertible into our
Common Stock, debt securities or a combination of such financing
alternatives. There is no assurance that the Company will be
successful in raising additional capital. Such issuances of
additional securities would further dilute the equity interests of
our existing shareholders, perhaps substantially. The Company
currently has the rights to several scripts that it intends to
obtain financing to produce during 2017 and 2018 and release
starting in 2018. It expects to earn a producer and overhead fee
for each of these productions. There can be no assurances that such
productions will be released or fees will be realized in future
periods. With the acquisition of 42West, the Company is currently
exploring opportunities to expand the services currently being
offered by 42West to the entertainment community and reducing
expenses by identifying certain costs that can be combined with the
Company’s. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
successful in selling these services to clients or reducing
expenses.
NOTE
3 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
The Company’s
trade accounts receivable are recorded at amounts billed to
customers, and presented on the balance sheet net of the allowance
for doubtful accounts. The allowance is determined by various
factors, including the age of the receivables, current economic
conditions, historical losses and other information management
obtains regarding the financial condition of customers. The policy
for determining the past due status of receivables is based on how
recently payments have been received. Receivables are charged off
when they are deemed uncollectible.
Revenue Recognition
Entertainment
Publicity revenue consists of fees from the performance of
professional services and billings for direct costs reimbursed by
clients. Fees are generally recognized on a straight-line or
monthly basis which approximates the proportional performance on
such contracts. Direct costs reimbursed by clients are billed as
pass-through revenue with no mark-up.
Revenue from motion
pictures and web series are recognized in accordance with guidance
of FASB Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 926-60
“Revenue Recognition – Entertainment-Films”.
Revenue is recorded when a distribution contract, domestic or
international, exists, the movie or web series is complete in
accordance with the terms of the contract, the customer can begin
exhibiting or selling the movie or web series, the fee is
determinable and collection of the fee is reasonable. On occasion,
the Company may enter into agreements with third parties for the
co-production or distribution of a movie or web series. Revenue
from these agreements will be recognized when the movie is complete
and ready to be exploited. Cash received and amounts billed in
advance of meeting the criteria for revenue recognition is
classified as deferred revenue.
Additionally,
because third parties are the principal distributors of the
Company’s movies, the amount of revenue that is recognized
from films in any given period is dependent on the timing, accuracy
and sufficiency of the information received from its distributors.
As is typical in the film industry, the Company's distributors may
make adjustments in future periods to information previously
provided to the Company that could have a material impact on the
Company’s operating results in later periods. Furthermore,
management may, in its judgment, make material adjustments to the
information reported by its distributors in future periods to
ensure that revenues are accurately reflected in the
Company’s financial statements. To date, the distributors
have not made, nor has the Company made, subsequent material
adjustments to information provided by the distributors and used in
the preparation of the Company’s historical financial
statements.
11
Investment
Investment
represents an investment in equity securities of The Virtual
Reality Company (“VRC”). The Company’s $220,000
investment in VRC represents less than 1% noncontrolling ownership
interest in VRC. Accordingly, the Company accounts for its
investment under the cost method. Under the cost method, the
investor’s share of earnings or losses is not included in the
balance sheet or statement of operations. The net accumulated
earnings of the investee subsequent to the date of investment are
recognized by the investor only to the extent distributed by the
investee as dividends. However, impairment charges are recognized
in the statement of operations, if factors come to our attention
that indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has
occurred that is other than temporary.
Property, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Property and
equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated
useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The
Company recorded depreciation expense of $73,341 and $77,977,
respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
$5,658 and $11,316, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2016. When items are retired or otherwise disposed
of, income is charged or credited for the difference between net
book value and proceeds realized thereon. Ordinary maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and replacements and
betterments are capitalized. Leasehold improvements are amortized
over the lesser of the term of the related lease or the estimated
useful lives of the assets. The range of estimated useful lives to
be used to calculate depreciation and amortization for principal
items of property and equipment are as follow:
|
Depreciation/
|
|
Amortization
|
Asset
Category
|
Period
(Years)
|
F Furniture and
fixtures
|
5 -
7
|
Computer
and office equipment
|
3 -
5
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
5
– 8, not to exceed the lease terms
|
Deferred Landlord Reimbursement
Deferred landlord
reimbursement represents the landlord’s reimbursement for
tenant improvements of one of the Company’s office spaces.
Such amount is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of
the lease.
Deferred Rent
Deferred rent
consists of the excess of the rent expense recognized on the
straight-line basis over the payments required under certain office
leases.
Intangible assets
In connection with
the acquisition of 42West that occurred on March 30, 2017, the
Company acquired an estimated $9,110,000 of intangible assets with
finite useful lives initially estimated to range from 3 to 10
years. As indicated in note 4, the purchase price allocation and
related consideration are provisional and subject to completion and
adjustment. Intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value
and are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable.
12
Goodwill
In connection with
the acquisition of 42West that occurred on March 30, 2017 (note 4),
the Company recorded $13,996,337 of goodwill, which management has
assigned to the Entertainment Publicity reporting unit. As
indicated in note 4, the purchase price allocation and related
consideration are provisional and subject to completion and
adjustment. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the
Company adjusted goodwill in the amount of $340,582 to record the
issuance of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
related to a working capital adjustment, as provided for in the 42
West purchase agreement and adjust the fair value of certain
liabilities as of the acquisition date. The Company accounts
for goodwill in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards
Codification No. 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other ("ASC
350"). ASC 350 requires goodwill to be reviewed for impairment
annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible
impairment. The Company evaluates goodwill in the fourth quarter or
more frequently if management believes indicators of impairment
exist. Such indicators could include, but are not limited to (1) a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate,
(2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or
assessment by a regulator.
The Company first
assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely
than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount, including goodwill. If management concludes that
it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting
unit is less than its carrying amount, management conducts a
two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first step of
the impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the
reporting unit with its carrying value (including goodwill). The
Company estimates the fair values of its reporting units using a
combination of the income, or discounted cash flows approach and
the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies’
data. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying
value, step two does not need to be performed. If the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value,
an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit,
and the Company must perform step two of the impairment test
(measurement).
Under step two, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount
of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value
of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined
by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner
similar to a purchase price allocation in acquisition accounting.
The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair
value of the reporting unit goodwill. To the extent that the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an
impairment loss would be recorded.
Warrants
When the Company
issues warrants, it evaluates the proper balance sheet
classification of the warrant to determine whether the warrant
should be classified as equity or as a derivative liability on the
consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with ASC 815-40,
Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in the Entity’s Own Equity
(ASC 815-40), the Company classifies a warrant as equity so long as
it is “indexed to the Company’s equity” and
several specific conditions for equity classification are met.
A warrant is not considered indexed to the Company’s
equity, in general, when it contains certain types of exercise
contingencies or contains certain provisions that may alter either
the number of shares issuable under the warrant or the exercise
price of the warrant, including, among other things, a provision
that could require a reduction to the then current exercise price
each time the Company subsequently issues equity or convertible
instruments at a per share price that is less than the current
conversion price (also known as a “full ratchet down round
provision”). If a warrant is not indexed to the
Company’s equity, it is classified as a derivative liability
which is carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value
with any changes in its fair value recognized currently in the
statement of operations.
The Company has
outstanding warrants at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
accounted for as derivative liabilities, because they contain
full-ratchet down round provisions (see notes 12 and 18). The
Company also has equity classified warrants outstanding at June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016 (see note 18).
13
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is
defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities
measured at fair value are categorized based on whether the inputs
are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are
observable. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including
assumptions about risk. Observable inputs are based on market data
obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable
inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions based on the
best information available in the circumstances. The fair value
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into
three broad levels, defined as follows:
Level 1
—
|
Inputs are quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of
the reporting date.
|
Level 2
—
|
Inputs other than
quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated
with observable market data.
|
Level 3
—
|
Unobservable inputs
that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This
includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies, and similar techniques that use significant
unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
that reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset
or liability as of the reporting date.
|
To account for the
acquisition of 42West that occurred on March 30, 2017, the Company
made a number of fair value measurements related to the different
forms of consideration paid for 42West and of the identified assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. In addition, the Company makes
fair value measurements of its Put Rights and Contingent
Consideration. See Note 4 and 12 for further discussion and
disclosures.
Certain warrants
issued in 2016 are measured and carried at fair value on a
recurring basis in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
See note 12 for disclosures regarding those fair value
measurements.
As of June 30,
2016, and for the three and six months then ended, the Company had
no assets or liabilities measured at fair value, on a recurring or
nonrecurring basis.
Business Segments
Through March 30,
2017 (the date the Company acquired 42West) (see Note 4), the
Company operated the following business segments:
|
1)
|
|
Dolphin Digital
Media (USA): The Company created online kids clubs and derives
revenue from annual membership fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Dolphin Digital
Studios: Dolphin Digital Studios creates original programming that
premieres online, with an initial focus on content geared toward
tweens and teens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Dolphin Films:
Dolphin Films produces motion pictures, with an initial focus on
family content. The motion pictures are distributed, through third
parties, in the domestic and international markets. The Company
derived all of its revenues from this segment during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017.
|
Based on an
analysis of the Company’s operating segments and the
provisions of ASC 280, Segment Reporting (ASC 280), the Company
believes it meets the criteria for aggregating these operating
segments into a single reporting segment because they have similar
economic characteristics, similar nature of product sold,
(content), similar production process (the Company uses the same
labor force, and content) and similar type of customer (children,
teens, tweens and family).
With the
acquisition of 42West, the Company has identified an additional
operating segment meeting the criteria in ASC 280 for a separate
reporting segment. The new segment is Entertainment Publicity and
primarily provides talent publicity, strategic communications and
entertainment, content marketing. See Note 20 for Segment reporting
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
14
NOTE 4 — ACQUISITION OF 42WEST
On March 30, 2017,
the “Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase
Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among the
Company and the Sellers. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on
March 30, 2017, the Company acquired from the Sellers 100% of the
membership interests of 42West and 42West became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company. 42West is an entertainment public
relations agency offering talent publicity, strategic
communications and entertainment content marketing.
The consideration
paid by the Company in connection with the 42West Acquisition was
$18,666,666 (less, the amount of 42West’s transaction
expenses paid by the Company and payments by the Company of certain
42West indebtedness) in shares of Common Stock, determined based on
the Company’s 30-trading-day average stock price prior to the
closing date of $4.61 per share, plus the potential to earn up to
an additional $9.3 million (less payment of certain taxes) in
shares of Common Stock, determined based on $4.61 per share. As a
result, the Company (i) issued 1,230,280 shares of Common Stock to
the Sellers on the closing date (the “Initial
Consideration”), (ii) (a) issued 344,550 shares of Common
Stock to certain current 42West employees and a former 42West
employee on April 13, 2017, to settle change in control provisions
in their pre-existing employment and termination agreements (the
“Change in Control Provisions”), (b) may issue up to
118,655 shares of Common Stock as employee stock bonuses (the
“Employee Bonus Shares”) upon the effectiveness of a
registration statement on Form S-8 promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),
registering the Employee Bonus Shares, and (c) will issue
approximately 1,535,125 shares of Common Stock to the Sellers, and
426,696 shares of Common Stock to certain current and former 42West
employees to settle the Change in Control Provisions, on January 2,
2018 (the "Post-Closing Consideration"), and (iii) potentially may
issue up to approximately 1,712,828 shares of Common Stock to the
Sellers, and 250,298 shares to certain current and former 42West
employees in accordance with the Change in Control Provisions,
based on the achievement of specified 42West financial performance
targets over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2017 and
ending December 31, 2019 as set forth in the Purchase Agreement
(the "Earn-Out Consideration", and together with the Initial
Consideration and the Post-Closing Consideration, (the "Stock
Consideration"). The Purchase Agreement allows for a working
capital adjustment to be calculated within 30 days of the closing
of the transaction. On April 13, 2017, the Company agreed to issue
100,000 shares of Common Stock as a provisional working capital
adjustment until certain information is agreed to between the
Sellers and the Company. None of the Common Stock included in the
Stock Consideration have been registered under the Securities
Act.
The Company also
agreed to pay the Sellers’ transaction costs and assumed
certain tax liabilities incurred or to be incurred by the Sellers
based on the proceeds they receive.
The issuance of
118,655 Employee Bonus Shares and the potential issuance of 235,575
shares as part of the Earn-Out Consideration to current employees
(the “Employee Earn-Out Shares”) are conditioned on the
employees remaining employed by the Company up to the date the
shares become issuable. If an employee does not remain employed for
the requisite service period, the shares they forfeit will be
allocated among and issued to the Sellers. The Employee Bonus
Shares and Employee Earnout Shares are not considered part of the
accounting consideration transferred to acquire 42West. The
Employee Bonus Shares will be accounted for under ASC
718, Compensation—Stock
Compensation, which will result in compensation expense in
the Company’s consolidated statements of operations (see
Stock-Based Compensation in Note 1).
The Purchase
Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants
and indemnifications.
Also in connection
with the 42West Acquisition, on March 30, 2017, the Company entered
into put agreements (the “Put Agreements”) with each of
the Sellers. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Put Agreements, the Company has granted the
Sellers the right, but not obligation, to cause the Company to
purchase up to an aggregate of 2,374,187 of their shares of Common
Stock received as Stock Consideration for a purchase price equal to
$4.61 per share during certain specified exercise periods set forth
in the Put Agreements up until December 2020 (the “Put
Rights”). During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the
Sellers exercised their Put Rights, in accordance with the Put
Agreements, and caused the Company to purchase 151,837 shares of
Common Stock for an aggregate amount of $700,000.
15
Each of Leslee
Dart, Amanda Lundberg and Allan Mayer (the “Principal
Sellers”) has entered into employment agreements with the
Company to continue as employees of the Company for a three-year
term after the closing of the 42West Acquisition. Each of the
employment agreements of the Principal Sellers contains lock-up
provisions pursuant to which each Principal Seller has agreed not
to transfer any shares of Common Stock in the first year, except
pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-1 or Form
S-3 promulgated under the Securities Act (an “Effective
Registration Statement”) or upon exercise of the Put Rights
pursuant to the Put Agreement, and, except pursuant to an Effective
Registration Statement, no more than 1/3 of the Initial
Consideration and Post-Closing Consideration received by such
Principal Seller in the second year and no more than an additional
1/3 of the Initial Consideration and Post-Closing Consideration
received by such Principal Seller in the third year, following the
closing date. The non-executive employees of 42West were retained
as well.
In addition, in
connection with the 42West Acquisition, on March 30, 2017, the
Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the
Sellers (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) pursuant
to which the Sellers are entitled to rights with respect to the
registration under the Securities Act. All fees, costs and expenses
of underwritten registrations under the Registration Rights
Agreement will be borne by the Company. At any time after the
one-year anniversary of the Registration Rights Agreement, the
Company will be required, upon the request of such Sellers holding
at least a majority of the Stock Consideration received by the
Sellers, to file a registration statement on Form S-1 and use its
reasonable efforts to affect a registration covering up to 25% of
the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers. In addition, if
the Company is eligible to file a registration statement on Form
S-3, upon the request of such Sellers holding at least a majority
of the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers, the Company
will be required to use its reasonable efforts to affect a
registration of such shares on Form S-3 covering up to an
additional 25% of the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers.
The Company is required to effect only one registration on Form S-1
and one registration statement on Form S-3, if eligible. The right
to have the Stock Consideration received by the Sellers registered
on Form S-1 or Form S-3 is subject to other specified conditions
and limitations.
The provisional
acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred
totaled $24,099,349, which consisted of the following:
Common Stock issued
at closing and in April 2017 (1,574,830 shares)
|
$6,693,028
|
Common Stock
issuable on January 2, 2018 (1,961,821 shares)
|
8,337,739
|
Contingent Consideration
|
3,627,000
|
Put
Rights
|
3,800,000
|
Sellers’
transaction costs paid at closing
|
260,000
|
Sellers’ tax
liabilities assumed
|
786,000
|
Working capital
adjustment
|
595,582
|
|
$24,099,349
|
The fair values of
the 1,574,830 shares of Common Stock issued at closing and in April
2017 and the 1,961,821 shares of Common Stock to be issued on
January 2, 2018 were determined based on the closing market price
of the Company’s Common Stock on the acquisition date of
$4.25 per share.
16
The Earn-Out
Consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay up to 1,727,551 shares of
Common Stock to the Sellers and one former employee of
42West to settle a Change in Control Provision (the “Contingent
Consideration”), on achievement of adjusted EBITDA targets
based on the operations of 42West over the three-year period
beginning January 1, 2017. The provisional fair value of the
Contingent Consideration was estimated using a Monte Carlo
Simulation model, which incorporated significant inputs that are
not observable in the market, and thus represents a Level 3
measurement as defined in ASC 820. The unobservable inputs utilized
for measuring the fair value of the Contingent Consideration
reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions
that market participants would use in valuing the Contingent
Consideration as of the acquisition date. The key assumptions as of
the acquisition date used in applying the Monte Carlo Simulation
model are as follows: estimated risk-adjusted EBITDA figures
ranging between $3,750,000 and $3,900,000; discount rates ranging
between 11.75% and 12.25% applied to the risk-adjusted EBITDA
estimates to derive risk-neutral EBITDA estimates; risk-free
discount rates ranging from 1.03% to 1.55%, based on U.S.
government treasury obligations with terms similar to those of the
Contingent Consideration arrangement, applied to the risk-neutral
EBITDA estimates; and an annual asset volatility estimate of
72.5%.
The provisional
fair value of the Put Rights at the acquisition date was estimated
using Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, which incorporates
significant inputs that are not observable in the market, and thus
represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The
unobservable inputs utilized for measuring the fair value of the
Put Rights reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the Put
Rights as of the acquisition date. The key assumptions in applying
the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model are as follows: a discount
rate range of 0.12% to 1.70% based on U.S Treasury obligations with
a term similar to the exercise period for each of the rights to put
shares to the Company as set forth in the Put Option agreements,
and an equity volatility estimate of 75% based on the stock price
volatility of the Company and certain publicly traded companies
operating in the advertising services industry.
The Sellers’
tax liabilities assumed relates to the New York City Unincorporated
Business Tax the Sellers will incur on the Initial Consideration,
Post-Closing Consideration and potential Earn-Out Consideration
received or to be received by them in connection with the 42West
Acquisition. The Company’s obligation to pay the
Sellers’ tax liabilities is a mutually agreed upon amount of
$786,000, which was based on the Sellers’ estimates at the
closing date of the 42West Acquisition of the amount of taxes to be
owed, based on a 4% tax rate and the Sellers’ estimated
taxable income. The estimated fair value of the Sellers’ tax
liabilities assumed may change during the measurement period,
pending receipt by the Company from the Sellers of an updated tax
liability accrual, and ultimately the Sellers’ preparation of
the related income tax returns related to the Initial
Consideration. Therefore, the estimated fair value of the
Sellers’ tax liabilities assumed is provisional.
The following table
summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, March 30, 2017.
Amounts in the table are provisional estimates that may change, as
described below.
Cash
|
$273,625
|
Accounts
receivable
|
1,706,644
|
Property, equipment
and leasehold improvements
|
1,087,962
|
Other
assets
|
265,563
|
Indemnification
asset
|
300,000
|
Intangible
assets
|
9,110,000
|
Total identifiable
assets acquired
|
12,743,794
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
(731,475)
|
Line of credit and
note payable
|
(1,025,000)
|
Settlement
liability
|
(300,000)
|
Other
liabilities
|
(902,889)
|
Tax
liabilities
|
(22,000)
|
Total liabilities
assumed
|
(2,981,364)
|
Net identifiable
assets acquired
|
9,762,430
|
Goodwill
|
14,336,919
|
Net assets
acquired
|
$24,099,349
|
17
Of the provisional
fair value of the $9,110,000 of acquired identifiable intangible
assets, $5,980,000 was assigned to customer relationships (10-year
useful life), $2,760,000 was assigned to the trade name (10-year
useful life), and $370,000 was assigned to non-competition
agreements (3-year useful life), that were recognized at fair value
on the acquisition date.
The estimated fair
value of accounts receivable acquired is $1,706,644, with the gross
contractual amount being $1,941,644. The Company expects $235,000
to be uncollectible. The estimated fair value of accounts
receivable is provisional, pending the Company obtaining additional
evidence of the actual amounts which will be
collected.
The fair values of
property and equipment and leasehold improvements of $1,087,962,
and other assets of $265,563, are based on 42West’s carrying
values prior to the acquisition, which approximate their fair
values.
The estimated fair
value of the settlement liability of $300,000 relates to
42West’s contingent liability to the Motion Picture Industry
Pension Individual Account and Health Plans (collectively the
“Plans”), two multiemployer pension funds and one
multiemployer welfare fund, respectively, that are governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (the
“Guild Dispute”). The Plans intend to conduct an audit
of 42West’s books and records for the period June 7, 2011
through August 20, 2016 in connection with the alleged contribution
obligations of 42West to the Plans. Based on a recent audit for
periods prior to June 7, 2011, the Company estimates that the
probable amount the Plan may seek to collect from 42West is
approximately $300,000, as of the acquisition date, in pension plan
contributions, health and welfare plan contributions and union dues
once the audit is completed. Accordingly, the Company has recorded
a $300,000 settlement accrual liability for the probable amount of
the liability it may incur due to the Motion Picture Industry
Pension audit of the period from March 25, 2012 through August 20,
2016 (see Note 21). The Company has not recorded a liability as of
the acquisition date for any exposure for additional settlement
obligations related to the period from August 20, 2016 through
March 30, 2017, as the Company has not reached a conclusion that a
loss for that period is probable. Therefore, the ultimate amount
related to the settlement liability as of March 30, 2017 may vary
from the amount recorded, and therefore the estimated fair value of
the settlement liability is provisional.
In accordance with
the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Sellers indemnified the
Company with respect to the Guild Dispute for losses incurred
related the Company’s alleged contribution obligations to the
Plans for the period between March 25, 2012 through March 26, 2016.
The Company has recorded an indemnification asset related to the
recorded settlement liability, measured at fair value on the same
basis as the settlement liability. The indemnification asset
represents the estimated fair value of the indemnification payment
expected to be received from Sellers, related to the
indemnification by the Sellers of the estimated settlement
liability. As the estimated fair value of the settlement liability
is provisional, so too is the estimated fair value of the
indemnification asset.
The deferred tax
liability related to 42West is a provisional estimate pending the
completion of an analysis of deferred income taxes.
Based on the
provisional fair values related to certain assets acquired and
liabilities assumed discussed above, the $14,336,919 of goodwill is
also provisional. The goodwill was assigned to the Entertainment
Publicity reporting unit, which at the same level as the
Entertainment Publicity segment (see Note 20). The goodwill
recognized is attributable primarily to expectations of continued
successful efforts to obtain new customers, buyer specific
synergies and the assembled workforce of 42West. The goodwill is
expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
The Company
expensed $207,564 and $745,272 of acquisition related costs in the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.
These costs are included in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations in the line item entitled “acquisition
costs.”
The revenue and net
income of 42West included in the consolidated amounts reported in
the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2017 are as follows:
|
For the three
months ended June 30, 2017
|
For the six
months ended June 30, 2017
|
Revenue
|
$5,137,556
|
$5,137,556
|
Net
income
|
244,764
|
244,764
|
18
The three- and
six-month amounts above are the same, as the amounts of
42West’s revenue and earnings for the one day between the
acquisition date (March 30, 2017) and March 31, 2017 were de
minimis.
The following
represents the pro forma consolidated operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively, as
if 42West had been acquired on January 1, 2016 and its results had
been included in the consolidated results of the Company beginning
on that date:
Pro
Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues
|
$7,831,652
|
$4,550,913
|
$13,054,074
|
$9,476,356
|
Net income
(loss)
|
(1,381,361)
|
(7,794,338)
|
4,562,242
|
(10,582,396)
|
Earnings (Loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares - Basic
|
18,643,324
|
8,823,665
|
17,322,369
|
7,553,754
|
Weighted average
shares – Fully diluted
|
18,643,324
|
8,823,665
|
19,821,375
|
7,553,754
|
Loss per share -
Basic
|
$(0.07)
|
$(0.88)
|
$0.26
|
$(2.09)
|
Loss per share
– Fully diluted
|
$(0.07)
|
$(0.88)
|
$(0.09)
|
$(2.09)
|
The pro forma
amounts have been calculated after applying the Company’s
accounting policies to the financial statements of 42West and
adjusting the combined results of the Company and 42West to reflect
(a) the amortization that would have been charged assuming the
intangible assets had been recorded on January 1, 2006, (b) the
reversal of 42West’s income taxes as if 42West had filed a
consolidated income tax return with the Company beginning January
1, 2016, and (c) to exclude $207,564 and $795,272 of acquisition
related costs that were expensed by the Company during the three
months ended June 30, 2017 and by the Company and 42West on a
combined basis during the six months ended June 30, 2017,
respectively.
The
following table summarizes the original and revised estimated fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the
acquisition date of March 30, 2017 and the related measurement
period adjustments to the fair values recorded during the three
months ended June 30, 2017:
|
March 31, 2017
(As initially reported)
|
Measurement Period Adjustments
|
June 30, 2017 (As adjusted)
|
Cash
|
$273,625
|
$-
|
$273,625
|
Accounts
receivable
|
1,706,644
|
-
|
1,706,644
|
Property, equipment
and leasehold improvements
|
1,087,962
|
-
|
1,087,962
|
Other
assets
|
265,563
|
-
|
265,563
|
Indemnification
asset
|
-
|
300,000
|
300,000
|
Intangible
assets
|
9,110,000
|
-
|
9,110,000
|
Total identifiable
assets acquired
|
12,443,794
|
300,000
|
12,743,794
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
(731,475)
|
-
|
(731,475)
|
Line of credit and
note payable
|
(1,025,000)
|
-
|
(1,025,000)
|
Settlement
liability
|
(300,000)
|
-
|
(300,000)
|
Other
liabilities
|
(902,889)
|
-
|
(902,889)
|
Tax
liabilities
|
(22,000)
|
-
|
(22,000)
|
Total liabilities
assumed
|
(2,981,364)
|
-
|
(2,981,364)
|
Net identifiable
assets acquired
|
9,462,430
|
-
|
9,762,430
|
Goodwill
|
13,996,337
|
340,582
|
14,336,919
|
Net assets
acquired
|
$23,458,767
|
$640,532
|
$24,099,349
|
19
The
above estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed are based on the information that was available as of the
acquisition date to estimate the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. As of March 31, 2017, the Company recorded the
identifiable net assets acquired of $9,462,430 as shown in the
table above in its condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the
three months ended June 30,2017, the Company’s measurement
period adjustments of $640,532 were made and, accordingly, the
Company recognized these adjustments in its June 30, 2017 condensed
consolidated balance sheet to reflect the adjusted identifiable net
assets acquired of $9,762,430 as shown in the table above. The
changes to the provisional amounts did not result in changes to the
Company’s previously reported condensed consolidated income
statement for the three months ended March 31, 2017.
The
following is a reconciliation of the initially reported fair value
to the adjusted fair value of goodwill:
Goodwill
originally reported at March 31, 2017
|
$13,996,337
|
Changes
to estimated fair values:
|
|
Contingent
Consideration
|
86,000
|
Put
Rights
|
(200,000)
|
Sellers’
tax liabilities assumed
|
159,000
|
Working
capital adjustment
|
595,582
|
Indemnification
asset
|
(300,000)
|
|
340,582
|
Adjusted
goodwill
|
$14,336,919
|
The
provisional estimated fair value of Contingent Consideration
increased from the originally reported amount primarily due to
changes in the estimated risk-adjusted EBITDA figures expected to
be achieved during the earn-out period, changes to the risk-free
discount rates and recalibration of the asset volatility estimate,
which are inputs to the Monte Carlo simulation model used to
calculate the fair value.
The
provisional estimated fair value of the Put Rights decreased from
the originally reported amount primarily due to a decrease in the
annual asset volatility assumption.
The
provisional estimated fair values of the working capital adjustment
and indemnification asset were initially determined subsequent to
the issuance by the Company of its condensed consolidated financial
statements for the three months ended March 31, 2017.
NOTE
5 — CAPITALIZED PRODUCTION COSTS, ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES AND
OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Capitalized Production Costs
Capitalized
production costs include the unamortized costs of completed motion
pictures and digital projects which have been produced by the
Company, costs of scripts for projects that have not been developed
or produced and costs for projects that are in production. These
costs include direct production costs and production overhead and
are amortized using the individual-film-forecast method, whereby
these costs are amortized and participations and residuals costs
are accrued in the proportion that current year’s revenue
bears to management’s estimate of ultimate revenue at the
beginning of the current year expected to be recognized from the
exploitation, exhibition or sale of the motion picture or web
series.
Motion Pictures
For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017, revenues earned from motion
pictures were $2,694,096 and $3,226,962, respectively, mainly
attributable to Max Steel,
the motion picture released on October 14, 2016 and international
sales of Believe, the
motion picture released in December 2013. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2016, the Company earned revenues of $4,000
and $4,157, respectively from the international sales of
Believe. The Company
amortized capitalized production costs (included as direct costs)
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations using the
individual film forecast computation method in the amount of
$1,620,635 and $2,049,913, respectively during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2017, related to Max Steel. All capitalized production
costs for Believe were
either amortized or impaired in prior years. Subsequent to the
release of Max Steel, the
Company used a discounted cash flow model and determined that the
fair value of the capitalized production costs should be impaired
by $2,000,000 due to a lower than expected domestic box office
performance. As of June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the
Company had a balance of $2,140,017, and $4,189,930, respectively
recorded as capitalized production costs related to Max Steel.
20
The Company has
purchased scripts, including one from a related party, for other
motion picture productions and has capitalized $235,000 and
$215,000 in capitalized production costs as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 associated with these scripts. The Company
intends to produce these projects but they were not yet in
production as of June 30, 2017.
On November 17,
2015, the Company entered into a quitclaim agreement with a
distributor for rights to a script owned by the Company. As part of
the agreement the Company will receive $221,223 plus interest and a
profit participation if the distributor decides to produce the
motion picture within 24 months after the execution of the
agreement. If the motion picture is not produced within the 24
months, all rights revert back to the Company. As per the terms of
the agreement, the Company is entitled to co-finance the motion
picture. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had not been notified by
the distributor that it intends to produce the motion
picture.
As of June 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company has total
capitalized production costs of $2,375,017 and $4,404,930, net of
accumulated amortization, tax incentives and impairment charges,
recorded on its condensed consolidated balance sheets related to
motion pictures.
Digital Productions
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company began production of a new
digital project showcasing favorite restaurants of NFL players
throughout the country. The Company entered into a co-production
agreement and is responsible for financing 50% of the
project’s budget. Per the terms of the agreement, the Company
is entitled to 50% of the profits of the project, net of any
distribution fees. During the three and six months ended June 30
and 2016, the Company did not earn any revenues related to digital
projects and impaired $2,439 of capitalized production costs
related to digital productions.
As of June
30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company has
total capitalized production costs of $251,444 and $249,083,
recorded on its condensed consolidated balance sheet related to the
digital project.
The Company has
assessed events and changes in circumstances that would indicate
that the Company should assess whether the fair value of the
productions are less than the unamortized costs capitalized and did
not identify indicators of impairment, other than those noted above
related to Max
Steel.
Accounts Receivables
The Company entered
into various agreements with foreign distributors for the licensing
rights of our motion picture, Max
Steel, in certain international territories. The motion
picture was delivered to the distributors and other stipulations,
as required by the contracts were met. As of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance of $4,038,871 and
$3,668,646, respectively, in accounts receivable related to the
revenues of Max
Steel.
The Company’s
trade accounts receivable related to its entertainment public
relations business are recorded at amounts billed to customers, and
presented on the balance sheet, net of the allowance for doubtful
accounts. The allowance is determined by various factors, including
the age of the receivables, current economic conditions, historical
losses and other information management obtains regarding the
financial condition of customers. As of June 30, 2017, the Company
had a balance of $1,951,827, net of $251,000 of allowance for
doubtful accounts of accounts receivable related to the
entertainment PR business. (note 4)
Other Current Assets
The Company had a
balance of $511,920 and $2,665,781 in other current assets on its
condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, these amounts
were primarily comprised of prepaid loan interest and
indemnification asset related to the 42 West Acquisition. See note
4 for further discussion. As of December 31, 2016, these amounts
were primarily comprised of tax incentive receivables, and prepaid
loan interest.
Tax Incentives -The Company has
access to government programs that are designed to promote film
production in the jurisdiction. As of June 30, 2017, and December
31, 2016, respectively, the Company had a balance of $0 and
$2,060,883 from these tax incentives. Tax incentives earned with
respect to expenditures on qualifying film productions are included
as an offset to capitalized production costs when the qualifying
expenditures have been incurred provided that there is reasonable
assurance that the credits will be realized.
21
Prepaid Interest – The
Company entered into a loan and security agreement to finance the
distribution and marketing costs of a motion picture and prepaid
interest related to the agreement. As of June 30, 2017, and
December 31, 2016, there was a balance of $177,225 and $602,697 of
prepaid interest.
NOTE
6 —PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD
IMPROVEMENTS
Property, equipment
and leasehold improvement consists of:
|
June 30, 2017
|
December 31, 2016
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
$531,255
|
$65,311
|
Computers
and equipment
|
308,422
|
41,656
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
352,644
|
7,649
|
|
1,192,321
|
114,616
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
(120,615)
|
(79,428)
|
|
$1,071,706
|
$35,188
|
The Company
depreciates furniture and fixtures over a useful life of between
five and seven years, computer and equipment over a useful life of
between three and five years and leasehold improvements over the
remaining term of the related leases. On June 1, 2017, the Company
entered into a sublease agreement for one of its offices in Los
Angeles. As part of the sublease agreement, the Company agreed to
allow the subtenant to acquire the fixed assets in the office. As a
result, the Company wrote off $64,814 of property, equipment and
leasehold improvements and $36,789 of accumulated depreciation.
This resulted in a loss in the amount of $28,025 that was recorded
on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for each of
the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as loss on disposal of
furniture, office equipment and leasehold improvements. The
balances as of June 30, 2017 include the provisional amounts of the
Company’s newly acquired subsidiary 42West. (See note
4)
NOTE
7 — INVESTMENT
Investments, at
cost, consist of 344,980 shares of common stock of VRC. In exchange
for services rendered by 42West to VRC during 2015, 42West received
both cash consideration and a promissory note that was convertible
into shares of common stock of VRC. On April 7, 2016, VRC closed an
equity financing round resulting in common stock being issued to a
third-party investor. This transaction triggered the conversion of
all outstanding promissory notes into shares of common stock of
VRC. The Company’s investment in VRC represents less than 1%
noncontrolling ownership interest in VRC. The Company had a balance
of $220,000 on its condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June
30, 2017, related to this investment.
NOTE
8— DEBT
Loan
and Security Agreements
First Group Film Funding
During the years
ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, the Company entered into various
loan and security agreements with individual noteholders (the
“First Loan and Security Noteholders”) for notes with
an aggregate principal amount of $11,945,219 to finance future
motion picture projects (the “First Loan and Security
Agreements”). During the year ended December 31, 2015, one of
the First Loan and Security Noteholders increased its funding under
its respective First Loan and Security Agreement for an additional
$500,000 note and the Company used the proceeds to repay $405,219
to another First Loan and Security Noteholder. Pursuant to the
terms of the First Loan and Security Agreements, the notes accrued
interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to 12% per annum, payable
monthly through June 30, 2015. During 2015, the Company exercised
its option under the First Loan and Security Agreements, to extend
the maturity date of these notes until December 31, 2016. In
consideration for the Company’s exercise of the option to
extend the maturity date, the Company was required to pay a higher
interest rate, increasing by 1.25% resulting in rates ranging from
12.50% to 13.25%. The First Loan and Security Noteholders, as a
group, were to receive the Company’s entire share of the
proceeds from the motion picture productions funded under the First
Loan and Security Agreements, on a prorata basis, until the
principal investment was repaid. Thereafter, the First Loan and
Security Noteholders, as a group, would have the right to
participate in 15% of the Company’s future profits from these
projects (defined as the Company’s gross revenues of such
projects less the aggregate amount of principal and interest paid
for the financing of such projects) on a prorata basis based on
each First Loan and Security Noteholder's loan commitment as a
percentage of the total loan commitments received to fund specific
motion picture productions.
22
On May 31, 2016 and
June 30, 2016, the Company entered into debt exchange agreements
with certain First Loan and Security Noteholders on substantially
similar terms to convert an aggregate of $11,340,000 of principal
and $1,811,490 of accrued interest into shares of Common Stock.
Pursuant to the terms of such debt exchange agreements, the Company
agreed to convert the debt owed to certain First Loan and Security
Noteholders into Common Stock at an exchange rate of $5.00 per
share and issued 2,630,298 shares of Common Stock. On May 31, 2016,
the market price of a share of Common Stock was $6.99 and on June
30, 2016 it was $6.08. As a result, the Company recorded losses on
the extinguishment of debt on its consolidated statement of
operations of $3,328,366 for the three and six months ended June
30, 2016 based on the difference between the fair value of the
Common Stock issued and the carrying amount of outstanding balance
of the exchanged notes on the date of the exchange. On December 29,
2016, as part of a global settlement agreement with an investor
that was a noteholder under each of a First Loan and Security
Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and a Second Loan and Security
Agreement, the Company entered into a debt exchange agreement
whereby the Company issued Warrant “J” that entitles
the warrant holder to purchase shares of Common Stock at a price of
$0.015 per share in settlement of $1,160,000 of debt from the note
under the First Loan and Security Agreement. See
Note 18 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
The Company did not
expense any interest during the three and six months ended June 30,
2017 and expensed $916,035 and $1,319,844, respectively, in
interest during the three and six months ended June 30 2016,
related to the First Loan and Security Agreements. The Company did
not have any debt outstanding or accrued interest as of June 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016 related to the First Loan and Security
Agreements on its condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Web Series Funding
During the years
ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, the Company entered into various
loan and security agreements with individual noteholders (the
“Web Series Noteholders”) for an aggregate principal
amount of notes of $4,090,000 which the Company used to finance
production of its 2015 web series (the “Web Series Loan and
Security Agreements”). Under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements, the Company issued promissory notes that accrued
interest at rates ranging from 10% to 12% per annum payable monthly
through August 31, 2015, with the exception of one note that
accrued interest through February 29, 2016. During 2015, the
Company exercised its option under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements to extend the maturity date of these notes to August 31,
2016. In consideration for the Company’s exercise of the
option to extend the maturity date, the Company was required to pay
a higher interest rate, increasing 1.25% resulting in interest
rates ranging from 11.25% to 13.25%. Pursuant to the terms of the
Web Series Loan and Security Agreements, the Web Series
Noteholders, as a group, would have had the right to participate in
15% of the Company’s future profits generated by the series
(defined as the Company’s gross revenues of such series less
the aggregate amount of principal and interest paid for the
financing of such series) on a prorata basis based on each Web
Series Noteholder's loan commitment as a percentage of the total
loan commitments received to fund the series.
During the six
months ended June 30, 2016, the Company entered into thirteen
individual debt exchange agreements (the “Web Series Debt
Exchange Agreements”) on substantially similar terms with the
Web Series Noteholders. Pursuant to the terms of the Web Series
Debt Exchange Agreements, the Company and each Web Series
Noteholder agreed to convert an aggregate of $4,204,547 of
principal and accrued interest under the Web Series Loan and
Security Agreements into an aggregate of 840,910 shares of Common
Stock at an exchange price of $5.00 per share as payment in full of
each of the notes issued under the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements. Mr. Nicholas Stanham, director of the Company, was one
of the Web Series Noteholders that converted his note into shares
of Common Stock. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,
the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt in the amount
of $12,018 and $588,694 due to the market price of the Common Stock
being between $6.00 and $6.08 per share on the dates of the
exchange.
During 2016, the
Company also entered into (i) substantially identical Subscription
Agreements with two Web Series Noteholders to convert $1,265,530 of
principal and interest into an aggregate of 253,106 shares of
Common Stock at an exchange price of $5.00 per share as payment in
full of each of the notes issued under the Web Series Loan and
Security Agreements and (ii) a global settlement agreement with
another investor that was a Noteholder of a First Loan and Security
Agreement, a Web Series Agreement and a Second Loan and Security
Agreement. As part of the global settlement agreement, the Company
entered into a debt exchange agreement whereby the Company issued
Warrant “J” that entitles the warrant holder to
purchase shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.015 per share in
settlement of $340,000 of debt from the Web Series Loan and
Security Agreement. See Note 18 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
23
The Company did not
expense any interest during the three and six months ended June 30,
2017 and expensed $40,370 and $284,579 respectively, in interest
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, related to the
Web Series Loan and Security Agreements. The Company did not have
any debt outstanding or accrued interest as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 related to the Web Series Loan and Security
Agreements on its condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Second Group Film Funding
During the year
ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into various loan and
security agreements with individual noteholders (the “Second
Loan and Security Noteholders”) for notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $9,274,327 to fund a new group of film projects
(the “Second Loan and Security Agreements”). Of this
total aggregate amount, notes with an aggregate principal amount of
$8,774,327 were issued in exchange for debt that had originally
been incurred by DE LLC, primarily related to the production and
distribution of the motion picture, “Believe”. The remaining $500,000
of principal amount was related to a note issued in exchange for
cash. The notes issued pursuant to the Second Loan and Security
Agreements accrue interest at rates ranging from 11.25% to 12% per
annum, payable monthly through December 31, 2016. The Company did
not exercise its option to extend the maturity date of these notes
until July 31, 2018. The Second Loan and Security Noteholders, as a
group, were to receive the Company’s entire share of the
proceeds from the related group of film projects, on a prorata
basis, until the principal balance was repaid. Thereafter, the
Second Loan and Security Noteholders, as a group, would have the
right to participate in 15% of the Company’s future profits
from such projects (defined as the Company’s gross revenues
of such projects less the aggregate amount of principal and
interest paid for the financing of such projects) on a prorata
basis based on each Second Loan and Security Noteholder’s
loan principal as a percentage of the total loan proceeds received
to fund the specific motion picture productions.
On May 31 and June
30, 2016, the Company entered into various debt exchange agreements
on substantially similar terms with certain of the Second Loan and
Security Noteholders to convert an aggregate of $4,344,350 of
principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock.
Pursuant to such debt exchange agreements, the Company agreed to
convert the debt at an exchange price of $5.00 per share and issued
868,870 shares of Common Stock. On May 31, 2016, the market price
of a share of the Common Stock was $6.99 and on June 30, 2016, it
was $6.08. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on the
extinguishment of debt of $1,312,059 on its consolidated statement
of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, due
to the difference between the exchange price and the market price
of the Common Stock on the dates of exchange. During 2016, the
Company repaid one of the Second Loan and Security Noteholders its
principal investment of $300,000. On December 29, 2016, as part of
a global settlement agreement with an investor that was a
noteholder under each of a First Loan and Security Agreement, a Web
Series Agreement and a Second Loan and Security Agreement, the
Company entered into a debt exchange agreement whereby the Company
issued Warrant “J” that entitles the warrant holder to
purchase shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.015 per share in
settlement of $4,970,990 of debt from the note under the Second
Loan and Security Agreement. See Note 18 for further discussion of
Warrant “J”.
During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company did not record any
interest expense related to the Second Loan and Security
Agreements. The Company recorded $517,218 and $780,408,
respectively during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 of
interest expense related to the Second Loan and Security
Agreements. The Company did not have any debt outstanding or
accrued interest as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 related
to the Second Loan and Security Agreements on its condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
The Company
accounts for the above agreements in accordance with ASC
470-10-25-2, which requires that cash received from an investor in
exchange for the future payment of a specified percentage or amount
of future revenue shall be classified as debt. The Company does not
purport the arrangements to be a sale and the Company has
significant continuing involvement in the generation of cash flows
due to the noteholders.
24
Prints and Advertising Loan
During 2016,
Dolphin Max Steel Holding, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
(“Max Steel Holding”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Dolphin Films, entered into a loan and security agreement (the
“P&A Loan”) providing for $14,500,000 non-revolving
credit facility that matures on August 25, 2017. The proceeds of
the credit facility were used to pay a portion of the print and
advertising expenses of the domestic distribution of “Max
Steel”. To secure Max Steel Holding’s obligations under
the Loan and Security Agreement, the Company granted to the lender
a security interest in bank account funds totaling $1,250,000
pledged as collateral and recorded as restricted cash in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, and
rights to the assets of Max Steel Holdings, but without recourse to
the assets of the Company. During the six months ended June 30,
2017, the Company agreed to allow the lender to apply the balance
held as Restricted Cash to the loan balance. The loan
is also partially secured by a $4,500,000 corporate guaranty from a
party associated with the film, of which Dolphin has backstopped
$620,000. The lender has retained a reserve of $1,531,871 for
loan fees and interest (the “Reserve”). Amounts
borrowed under the credit facility will accrue interest at either
(i) a fluctuating per annum rate equal to the 5.5% plus a base rate
or (ii) a per annum rate equal to 6.5% plus the LIBOR determined
for the applicable interest period. As June 30, 2017 and December
31, 2016, the Company had an outstanding balance of $9,688,855 and
$12,500,000, respectively, including the Reserve, related to this
agreement recorded on the condensed consolidated balance
sheets. On its condensed consolidated statement of operations
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company
recorded (i) interest expense of $205,317 and $425,472,
respectively, related to the P&A Loan and (ii) $500,000 in
direct costs from loan proceeds that were not used by the
distributor for the marketing of the film and returned to the
lender.
Production
Service Agreement
During
the year ended December 31, 2014, Dolphin Films entered into a
financing agreement for the production of one of the
Company’s feature film, Max
Steel (the “Production Service Agreement”). The
Production Service Agreement was for a total amount of $10,419,009
with the lender taking an $892,619 producer fee. The Production
Service Agreement contained repayment milestones to be made during
the year ended December 31, 2015, that if not met, accrued interest
at a default rate of 8.5% per annum above the published base rate
of HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited until the maturity on January 31,
2016 or the release of the movie. Due to a delay in the release of
Max Steel, the Company did not make the repayments as prescribed in
the Production Service Agreement. As a result, the Company recorded
accrued interest of $1,351,882 and $1,147,520, respectively, as of
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 in other current liabilities on
the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The loan
was partially secured by international distribution agreements
entered into by the Company prior to the commencement of principal
photography and the receipt of tax incentives. As a condition to
the Production Service Agreement, the Company acquired a completion
guarantee from a bond company for the production of the motion
picture. The funds for the loan were held by the bond company and
disbursed as needed to complete the production in accordance with
the approved production budget. The Company recorded debt as funds
were transferred from the bond company for the
production.
As of
June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 the Company had outstanding
balances of $3,203,689 and $6,243,069, respectively, related to
this debt on its condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Line
of Credit
The Company’s
subsidiary, 42West has a $1,500,000 revolving credit line agreement
with City National Bank (“City National”), which
matures on August 31, 2017. The Company is in the process of
renewing the credit line on substantially identical terms.
Borrowings bear interest at the bank’s prime lending rate
plus 0.875% (5.125% on June 30, 2017). The debt, including letters
of credit outstanding, is collateralized by substantially all of
the assets of 42West and guaranteed by the Principal Sellers of
42West. The credit agreement requires the Company to meet certain
covenants and includes limitations on distributions to members.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company drew
$250,000 from the credit line for working capital. The outstanding
loan balance as of June 30, 2017 is $750,000.
25
Payable
to Former Member of 42West
During 2011, 42West
entered into an agreement to purchase the interest of one of its
members. Pursuant to the agreement, the outstanding principal shall
be payable immediately if 42West sells, assigns, transfers, or
otherwise disposes all or substantially all of its assets and/or
business prior to December 31, 2018. In connection with the
Company’s acquisition of the membership interest of 42West,
(note 4), payment of this redemption was accelerated, with $300,000
paid during April 2017, and the remaining $225,000 to be paid in
January 2018. The outstanding balance at June 30, 2017 of $225,000
has been included in other current liabilities on the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet.
NOTE
9 — CONVERTIBLE DEBT
On December 7,
2015, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an
investor to sell up to $7,000,000 in convertible promissory notes
of the Company. The promissory note would bear interest on the
unpaid balance at a rate of 10% per annum, and became due and
payable on December 7, 2016. The promissory note could have been
prepaid at any time without a penalty. Pursuant to the subscription
agreement, the Company issued a convertible note to the investor in
the amount of $3,164,000. At any time prior to the maturity date,
the investor had the right, at its option, to convert some or all
of the convertible note into Common Stock. The convertible note had
a conversion price of $5.00 per share. The outstanding principal
amount and all accrued interest were mandatorily and automatically
converted into Common Stock, at the conversion price, upon the
average market price per share of Common Stock being greater than
or equal to the conversion price for twenty trading
days.
During the three
months ended March 31, 2016, a triggering event occurred pursuant
to the convertible note agreement. As such 632,800 shares of Common
Stock were issued in satisfaction of the convertible note payable.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company
recorded interest expense of $31,207 on its condensed consolidated
statements of operations. No interest expense was recorded for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
NOTE
10— NOTES PAYABLE
On June 14, 2017,
the Company signed a promissory note in the amount of $400,000 with
a two year term, expiring on June 14, 2019. The promissory note
bears interest of 10% per annum and can be prepaid without a
penalty after the initial six months.
On April 18, 2017,
the Company signed a promissory note in the amount of $250,000 that
expires on October 18, 2017, can be prepaid without a penalty at
any time and bears interest at 10% per annum.
On April 10, 2017,
the Company signed two promissory notes with an aggregate principal
amount of $300,000 on substantially identical terms. Both
promissory notes are held by one noteholder, expire on October 10,
2017, can be prepaid without a penalty at any time and bear
interest at 10% per annum.
On July 5, 2012,
the Company signed an unsecured promissory note in the amount of
$300,000 bearing 10% interest per annum and payable on demand. No
payments were made on the note during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2017. The Company recorded accrued interest of
$149,671 and $134,794 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
respectively related to this note. As of each June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance of $300,000 on its
condensed consolidated balance sheets related to this note
payable.
The Company has a
balance of $850,000 in current liabilities and $400,000 in non
current liabilities related to these notes payable as of June 30,
2017 on its condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company
expensed $20,924 and $28,321, respectively for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2017 and $7,479 and $14,959, respectively,
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 for interest
related to these promissory notes.
26
NOTE
11 — LOANS FROM RELATED PARTY
On December 31,
2011, the Company issued an unsecured revolving promissory note
(the “DE Note”) to DE LLC, an entity wholly owned by
the Company's CEO. The DE Note accrued interest at a rate of 10%
per annum. DE LLC had the right at any time to demand that all
outstanding principal and accrued interest be repaid with a ten-day
notice to the Company. On March 4, 2016, the Company entered into a
subscription agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”)
with DE LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement,
the Company and DE LLC agreed to convert the $3,073,410 aggregate
amount of principal and interest outstanding under the DE Note into
614,682 shares of Common Stock. The shares were converted at a
price of $5.00 per share. On the date of the conversion that market
price of the shares was $6.00 and as a result the Company recorded
a loss on the extinguishment of the debt of $614,682 on the
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2016. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded interest expense in the
amount of $32,008 on its condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
In addition, DE LLC
has previously advanced funds for working capital to Dolphin Films.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, Dolphin Films agreed to
enter into second Loan and Security Agreements with certain of DE
LLC’s debtholders, pursuant to which the debtholders
exchanged their DE Notes for notes issued by Dolphin Films totaling
$8,774,327. See note 8 for more details. The amount of debt assumed
by Dolphin Films was applied against amounts owed to DE LLC by
Dolphin Films. During 2016, Dolphin Films entered into a promissory
note with DE LLC (the “New DE Note”) in the principal
amount of $1,009,624. The New DE Note is payable on demand and
bears interest at 10% per annum. During the six months ended June
30, 2017, the Company agreed to include certain script costs and
other payables totaling $594,315 that were owed to DE LLC as part
of the New DE Note. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the
Company received proceeds related to the New DE Note from DE LLC in
the amount of $1,297,000 and repaid DE LLC $506,981. As of June 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016, Dolphin Films owed DE LLC $1,818,661
and $684,326, respectively, that was recorded on the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Dolphin Films recorded interest
expense of $44,131 and $67,418 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017.
NOTE
12 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Warrants
During 2016, the
Company issued Series G, H, I, J and K Common Stock warrants (the
“Warrants”) for which the Company determined that the
Warrants should be accounted for as derivatives (see Note 18), for
which a liability is recorded in the aggregate and measured at fair
value in the consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis, and
the change in fair value from one reporting period to the next is
reported as income or expense in the consolidated statements of
operations. On March 31, 2017, Warrants J and K were
exercised.
The Company records
the fair value of the liability in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets under the caption “Warrant liability”
and records changes to the liability against earnings or loss under
the caption “Changes in fair value of warrant
liability” in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations. The carrying amount at fair value of the aggregate
liability for the Warrants recorded on the condensed consolidated
balance sheet at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is $4,170,677
and $20,405,190. Due to the change in the fair value of the Warrant
Liability for the period in which the Warrants were outstanding
during the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a
loss on the warrant liability of $ 533,812 and a gain of $6,289,513
for the period the Warrants were outstanding during the six months
ended June 30, 2017 in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
The Warrants
outstanding at June 30, 2017 have the following terms:
|
Issuance
Date
|
Number of Common
Shares
|
Per Share
Exercise Price
|
Remaining Term
(Months)
|
Expiration
Date
|
Series G
Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
1,500,000
|
$4.61
|
7
|
January 31,
2018
|
Series H
Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
500,000
|
$4.61
|
19
|
January 31,
2019
|
Series I
Warrants
|
November 4,
2016
|
500,000
|
$4.61
|
31
|
January 31,
2020
|
27
The Warrants have
an adjustable exercise price due to a full ratchet down round
provision, which would result in a downward adjustment to the
exercise price in the event the Company completes a financing in
which the price per share of the financing is lower than the
exercise price of the Warrants in effect immediately prior to the
financing.
Due to the
existence of the full ratchet down round provision, which creates a
path-dependent nature of the exercise prices of the Warrants, the
Company concluded it is necessary to measure the fair value of the
Warrants using a Monte Carlo Simulation model, which incorporates
inputs classified as “level 3” according to the fair
value hierarchy in ASC 820, Fair Value. In general, level 3
assumptions utilize unobservable inputs that are supported by
little or no market activity in the subject instrument and that are
significant to the fair value of the liabilities. The unobservable
inputs the Company utilizes for measuring the fair value of the
Warrant liability reflects management’s own assumptions about
the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability as of the reporting date.
The Company
determined the fair values of the Warrants by using the following
key inputs to the Monte Carlo Simulation model at June 30,
2017:
|
As of June 30,
2017
|
||
Inputs
|
Series
G
|
Series
H
|
Series
I
|
Volatility
(1)
|
63.8%
|
59.2%
|
77.2%
|
Expected term
(years)
|
0.58
|
1.58
|
2.58
|
Risk free interest
rate
|
1.157%
|
1.322%
|
1.479%
|
Common stock
price
|
$5.00
|
$5.00
|
$5.00
|
Exercise
price
|
$4.61
|
$4.61
|
$4.61
|
(1)
“Level
3” input.
The stock
volatility assumption represents the range of the volatility curves
used in the valuation analysis that the Company has determined
market participants would use based on comparison with similar
entities. The risk-free interest rate is interpolated where
appropriate, and is based on treasury yields. The valuation model
also included a level 3 assumption as to dates of potential future
financings by the Company that may cause a reset of the exercise
price.
Since derivative
financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at
fair values, the Company’s income or loss will reflect the
volatility in changes to these estimates and assumptions. The fair
value is most sensitive to changes at each valuation date in the
Company’s Common Stock price, the volatility rate assumption,
and the exercise price, which could change if the Company were to
do a dilutive future financing.
For the Warrants,
which measured at fair value categorized within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy, the following is a reconciliation of the fair
values from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017:
|
Warrants
“G”,
“H” and “I”
|
Warrants
“J”
and “K”
|
Total
|
Beginning fair
value balance reported in the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2016
|
$6,393,936
|
$14,011,254
|
$20,405,190
|
Change in fair
value (gain) reported in the statements of operations
|
(2,223,259)
|
(4,066,254)
|
(6,289,513)
|
Exercise of
“J” and “K” Warrants
|
-
|
(9,945,000)
|
(9,945,000)
|
Ending fair value
balance reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017
|
$4,170,677
|
$-
|
$4,170,677
|
28
Put Rights
In connection with
the 42West Acquisition (note 4), on March 30, 2017, the Company
entered into Put Agreements with each of the Sellers. Pursuant to
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Put
Agreements, the Company has granted the Sellers the right, but not
obligation, to cause the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of
2,374,187 of their shares of Common Stock received as Stock
Consideration for a purchase price equal to $4.61 per share during
certain specified exercise periods set forth in the Put Agreements
up until December 2020 (the “Put Rights”). During the
three months ended June 30, 2017, the Sellers exercised their Put
Rights, in accordance with the Put Agreements, and caused the
Company to purchase 151,837 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate
amount of $700,000.
The Company records
the fair value of the liability in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets under the caption “Put Rights” and
records changes to the liability against earnings or loss under the
caption “Changes in fair value of put rights” in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of
the Put Rights on the date of acquisition was $3,800,000. The
carrying amount at fair value of the aggregate liability for the
Put Rights recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017 is $3,900,000. Due to the change in the fair value of
the Put Rights for the period in which the Put Rights were
outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2017, the
Company recorded a loss on the put rights of $100,000 in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Company
measured the fair value of the Put Rights as of the date of the
acquisition.
The Company
utilized the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, which incorporates
significant inputs that are not observable in the market, and thus
represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The
unobservable inputs utilized for measuring the fair value of the
Put Rights reflect management’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the Put
Rights as of the acquisition date and June 30, 2017.
The Company
determined the fair value by using the following key inputs to the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model:
|
|
On the date of
Acquisition
(March 30,
2017)
|
|
As
of
June 30,
2017
|
||
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
||
Equity Volatility
estimate
|
|
75%
|
|
92.5%
|
||
Discount rate based
on US Treasury obligations
|
|
0.12% -
1.70%
|
|
0.90% -
1.61%
|
For the Put Rights,
which measured at fair value categorized within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy, the following is a reconciliation of the fair
values from the date of acquisition (March 30, 2017) to June 30,
2017:
Beginning fair
value balance on the Acquisition Date (March 30, 2017)
|
$3,800,000
|
Change in fair
value (loss) reported in the statements of operations
|
100,000
|
Ending fair value
balance reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017
|
$3,900,000
|
Contingent Consideration
In connection with
the 42 West acquisition (note 4), the Seller have the potential to
earn up to $9,333,333 (1,727,551
shares of Common Stock) on achievement of adjusted EBITDA targets
based on the operations of 42West over the three-year period
beginning January 1, 2017 (the “Contingent
Consideration”).
29
The Company records
the fair value of the liability in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets under the caption “Contingent
Consideration” and records changes to the liability against
earnings or loss under the caption “Changes in fair value of
contingent consideration” in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations. The fair value of the Contingent
Consideration on the date of acquisition was $3,627,000. The
carrying amount at fair value of the aggregate liability for the
Contingent Consideration recorded on the condensed consolidated
balance sheet at June 30, 2017 is $3,743,000. Due to the change in
the fair value of the Contingent Consideration for the period in
which the Contingent Consideration was outstanding during the three
months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a loss on the put
rights of $116,000 in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations. The Company measured the fair value of the Contingent
Consideration as of the date of the acquisition.
The Company
utilized a Monte Carlo Simulation model, which incorporates
significant inputs that are not observable in the market, and thus
represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The
unobservable inputs utilized for measuring the fair value of the
Contingent Consideration reflect management’s own assumptions
about the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing
the Contingent Consideration as of the acquisition
date.
The Company
determined the fair value by using the following key inputs to the
Monte Carlo Simulation Model:
|
|
On the date of
Acquisition
(March 30,
2017)
|
|
As
of
June 30,
2017
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Free Discount
Rate (based on US government treasury obligation with a term
similar to that of the Contingent Consideration)
|
|
1.03%
-1.55%
|
|
1.14% -
1.47%
|
Annual Asset
Volatility Estimate
|
|
72.5%
|
|
90%
|
Estimated
EBITDA
|
|
$3,600,000 -
$3,900,000
|
|
$3,600,000 -
$3,900,000
|
For the Contingent
Consideration, which measured at fair value categorized within
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the following is a
reconciliation of the fair values from the date of acquisition
(March 30, 2017) to June 30, 2017:
Beginning fair
value balance on the Acquisition Date (March 30, 2017)
|
$3,627,000
|
Change in fair
value (loss) reported in the statements of operations
|
116,000
|
Ending fair value
balance reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2017
|
$3,743,000
|
There were no
assets or liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis at
June 30, 2016.
NOTE
13— LICENSING AGREEMENT - RELATED PARTY
The Company has
entered into a ten-year licensing agreement with DE LLC, a related
party. Under the license, the Company is authorized to use DE
LLC’s brand properties in connection with the creation,
promotion and operation of subscription based Internet social
networking websites for children and young adults. The license
requires that the Company pays to DE LLC royalties at the rate of
fifteen percent of net sales from performance of the licensed
activities. The Company did not use any of the brand properties
related to this agreement and as such, there was no royalty expense
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
2016.
30
NOTE
14 — DEFERRED REVENUE
During the year
ended December 31, 2014, the Company entered into agreements with
various entities for the international distribution rights of a
motion picture that was in production. As required by the
distribution agreements, the Company received $1,418,368 of
deposits for these rights that was recorded as deferred revenue on
its condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, the Company delivered the motion picture to
various international distributors and recorded $1,371,687 of
revenue from production from these deposits. As of June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company has a balance of
$20,303 and $46,681 as deferred revenue on its condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE
15 – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
VIEs are entities
that, by design, either (1) lack sufficient equity to permit the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support from other parties, or (2) have equity investors
that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating
to the entity’s operations through voting rights, or do not
have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or the right to
receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of
VIE is a special-purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are
commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate
certain assets, and distribute the cash flows from those assets to
investors. The legal documents that govern the transaction specify
how the cash earned on the assets must be allocated to the
SPE’s investors and other parties that have rights to those
cash flows. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors
from claims on the SPE’s, assets by creditors of other
entities, including the creditors of the seller of the
assets.
The primary
beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the assets and
liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party that
has both (1) the power to direct the activities of an entity that
most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and
(2) through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb
losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. To assess whether the
Company has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most
significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, the
Company considers all the facts and circumstances, including its
role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and
responsibilities.
To assess whether
the Company has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant
to the VIE, the Company considers all of its economic interests,
including debt and equity investments, servicing fees, and
derivative or other arrangements deemed to be variable interests in
the VIE. This assessment requires that the Company apply judgment
in determining whether these interests, in the aggregate, are
considered potentially significant to the VIE.
The Company
performs ongoing reassessments of (1) whether entities previously
evaluated under the majority voting-interest framework have become
VIEs, based on certain triggering events, and therefore would be
subject to the VIE consolidation framework, and (2) whether changes
in the facts and circumstances regarding the Company’s
involvement with a VIE cause the Company’s consolidation
conclusion to change. The consolidation status of the VIEs with
which the Company is involved may change as a result of such
reassessments. Changes in consolidation status are applied
prospectively with assets and liabilities of a newly consolidated
VIE initially recorded at fair value unless the VIE is an entity
which was previously under common control, which in that case is
consolidated based historical cost. A gain or loss may be
recognized upon deconsolidation of a VIE depending on the carrying
amounts of deconsolidated assets and liabilities compared to the
fair value of retained interests and ongoing contractual
arrangements.
The Company
evaluated certain entities of which it did not have a majority
voting interest and determined that it had (1) the power to direct
the activities of the entities that most significantly impact their
economic performance and (2) had the obligation to absorb losses or
the right to receive benefits from these entities. As such the
financial statements of Max Steel Productions, LLC and JB Believe,
LLC are consolidated in the balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, and in the statements of operations and
statements of cash flows presented herein for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. These entities were previously
under common control and have been accounted for at historical
costs for all periods presented.
31
Following is
summary financial information for the VIE’s:
|
Max Steel Productions LLC
|
JB Believe LLC
|
||||||||
(in
USD)
|
As of and for the
six months ended
June 30, 2017
|
As of and
for the three
months
ended June
30, 2017
|
As of
December 31,
2016
|
As of and
for the six
months ended
June 30, 2016
|
As of and for
the three
months
ended June
30, 2016
|
As of and
for the six
months ended
June 30, 2017
|
As of and
for the
three
months
ended June
30, 2017
|
As of
December 31,
2016
|
As of and for
the six months
ended June 30,
2016
|
As of and for
the three
months ended
June 30, 2016
|
Assets
|
9,207,664
|
9,207,664
|
12,327,887
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
30,843
|
30,843
|
240,269
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
Liabilities
|
(13,011,741)
|
(13,011,741)
|
(15,922,552)
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
(6,755,328)
|
(6,755,328)
|
(7,014,098)
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
Revenues
|
3,173,826
|
2,656,523
|
n/a
|
-
|
-
|
53,136
|
37,573
|
n/a
|
3,786
|
3,786
|
Expenses
|
(3,383,238)
|
(2,236,428)
|
n/a
|
(541,731)
|
(325,024)
|
(3,792)
|
-
|
n/a
|
(260,592)
|
(133,711)
|
NOTE
16 — STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
A.
Preferred
Stock
The Company’s
Amended Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Board of Directors has
the power to designate the rights and preferences of the preferred
stock and issue the preferred stock in one or more
series.
On October 14,
2015, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to
designate 4,000,000 preferred shares, as “Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock” with a $0.10 par value. Each
share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible, at
the holders request, into 0.95 shares of Common Stock. Holders of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock do not have any voting
rights.
On October 16,
2015, the Company and T Squared Partners LP ("T Squared") entered
into a Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement whereby 1,042,753 shares
of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were to be exchanged for
1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon
satisfaction of certain conditions. On March 7, 2016, all
conditions were satisfied and, pursuant to the Preferred Stock
Exchange Agreement, the Company issued to T Squared Partners LP
1,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The
Company retired the 1,042,753 shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock it received in the exchange. The Company recorded a
preferred stock dividend in additional paid in capital of
$5,227,247 related to this exchange. On November 14, 2016, T
Squared notified the Company that it would convert 1,000,000 shares
of Series B Preferred Stock into 950,000 shares of the Common Stock
effective November 16, 2016.
32
On February 23,
2016, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to
designate 1,000,000 preferred shares as “Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock” with a $0.001 par value which may be issued
only to an “Eligible Series C Preferred Stock Holder”.
On May 9, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the
amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation to
reduce the designation of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to
50,000 shares with a $0.001 par value. The amendment was approved
by the Company’s shareholders on June 29, 2017 and the
Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with
the State of Florida (‘the Second Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation”) on July 6, 2017. Pursuant to the
Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, each share
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will be convertible into
one share of common stock, subject to adjustment for each issuance
of common stock (but not upon issuance of common stock equivalents)
that occurred, or occurs, from the date of issuance of the Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock (the “issue date”) until
the fifth (5th) anniversary of the issue date (i) upon the
conversion or exercise of any instrument issued on the issued date
or thereafter issued (but not upon the conversion of the Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock), (ii) upon the exchange of debt for
shares of common stock, or (iii) in a private placement, such that
the total number of shares of common stock held by an
“Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder” (based on the
number of shares of common stock held as of the date of issuance)
will be preserved at the same percentage of shares of common stock
outstanding held by such Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder on
such date. An Eligible Class C Preferred Stock Holder means any of
(i) DE LLC for so long as Mr. O’Dowd continues to
beneficially own at least 90% and serves on the board of directors
or other governing entity, (ii) any other entity in which Mr.
O’Dowd beneficially owns more than 90%, or a trust for the
benefit of others, for which Mr. O’Dowd serves as trustee and
(iii) Mr. O’Dowd individually. Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock will only be convertible by the Eligible Class C Preferred
Stock Holder upon the Company satisfying one of the “optional
conversion thresholds”. Specifically, a majority of the
independent directors of the Board, in its sole discretion, must
have determined that the Company accomplished any of the following
(i) EBITDA of more than $3.0 million in any calendar year, (ii)
production of two feature films, (iii) production and distribution
of at least three web series, (iv) theatrical distribution in the
United States of one feature film, or (v) any combination thereof
that is subsequently approved by a majority of the independent
directors of the Board based on the strategic plan approved by the
Board. While certain events may have occurred that could be deemed
to have satisfied this criteria, the independent directors of the
Board have not yet determined that an optional conversion threshold
has occurred. Except
as required by law, holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
will only have voting rights once the independent directors of the
Board determine that an optional conversion threshold has occurred.
Only upon such determination, will the Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock be entitled or permitted to vote on all matters
required or permitted to be voted on by the holders of common stock
and will be entitled to that number of votes equal to three votes
for the number of Conversion Shares (as defined in the Certificate
of Designation) into which such Holder’s shares of the Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock could then be converted.
The Certificate of
Designation also provides for a liquidation value of $0.001 per
share. The Certificate of Designation also provides for dividend
rights of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on parity with
the Company’s Common Stock.
On March 7, 2016,
as the Merger Consideration related to the Company’s merger
with Dolphin Films), DE LLC was issued 2,300,000 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock and 1,000,000 shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock. On November 15, 2016, DE LLC converted
2,300,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into
2,185,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
On May 9, 2017, the
Company’s Board of Directors determined that it was in the
best interest of the Company to retire the designations of Series A
Convertible Preferred and Series B Convertible Preferred and this
determination was included in the Second Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation filed with the State of Florida on July
6, 2017.
As of June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, the Company did not have any Series A or
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding and 50,000 shares
of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding.
33
B.
Common
Stock
The Company’s
Articles of Incorporation previously authorized the issuance of
200,000,000 shares of Common Stock. 500,000 shares had been
designated for the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the
“2012 Plan”). On June 29, 2017, our shareholders of the
Company approved the 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2017
Plan”) that replaced the 2012 Plan. On August 7, 2017, the
Company registered 2,000,000 of Common Stock through the filing of
an S-8 statement to be used for the 2017 Plan. As of June 30, 2017,
and December 31, 2016, no awards have been issued in connection
with these plans. On February 23, 2016, the Company filed Articles
of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Incorporation with the
Secretary of State of the State of Florida to increase the number
of authorized shares of its Common Stock from 200,000,000 to
400,000,000.
On February 16,
2017, the Company entered into a subscription agreement pursuant to
which the Company issued and sold to an investor 100,000 shares of
Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per Share. This transaction
provided $500,000 in proceeds for the Company.
On March 30, 2017,
the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
to acquire a 100% membership interest in 42West. The Company issued
1,230,280 shares of Common Stock at a price of $4.61 per share
related to this transaction. See note 4 for further details on the
acquisition.
On March 30, 2017,
KCF Investments LLC and BBCF 2011 LLC exercised Warrants J and K to
purchase 2,170,000 and 170,000, respectively, of shares of Common
Stock at a purchase price of $0.015 per share. This transaction
provided $35,100 in proceeds for the Company. See note 18 for
further discussion.
On April 13, 2017,
the Company issued the following shares of Common Stock as per the
42West Acquisition agreement; (i) 344,550 to certain designated
employees and (ii) 100,000 shares as an estimate for the Purchase
Consideration withheld on the date of closing related to the
working capital.
On April 13, 2017,
the Company issued 6,508 shares of Common Stock to a consultant for
services rendered during the month ended March 31, 2017. The shares
were issued at a purchase price of $4.61 per share.
On April 13, 2017,
T Squared partially exercised Class E Warrants and acquired 325,770
shares of our common stock pursuant to the cashless exercise
provision in the related warrant agreement. T Squared had
previously paid down $1,675,000 for these shares.
On April 14, 2017,
the Principal Sellers of 42West, exercised put options in the
aggregate amount of 86,764 shares of Common Stock and were paid an
aggregate total of $400,000.
On June 26, 2017,
the Principal Sellers of 42West, exercised put options in the
aggregate amount of 65,073 shares of Common Stock and were paid an
aggregate total of $300,000.
As of June 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016, the Company had 18,690,792 and
14,395,521 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding,
respectively.
C.
Noncontrolling
Interest
On May 21, 2012,
the Company entered into an agreement with a note holder to form
Dolphin Kids Clubs, LLC ("Dolphin Kids Clubs"). Under the terms of
the agreement, Dolphin converted an aggregate amount of $1,500,000
in notes payable and received an additional $1,500,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2012 for a 25% membership interest in the
newly formed entity. The Company holds the remaining 75% and thus
controlling interest in Dolphin Kids Clubs. The purpose of Dolphin
Kids Clubs is to create and operate online kids clubs for selected
charitable, educational and civic organizations. The agreement
encompasses kids clubs created between January 1, 2012 and December
31, 2016. It was a “gross revenue agreement” and the
Company was responsible for paying all associated operating
expenses. On December 29, 2016, as part of a global agreement with
the 25% member of Dolphin Kids Clubs, the Company entered into a
Purchase Agreement and acquired the 25% noncontrolling interest of
Dolphin Kids Clubs. In exchange for the 25% interest, the Company
issued Warrant “J” that entitles the warrant holder to
purchase shares of common stock at a price of $0.015 per share. See
notes 12 and 18 for further discussion of Warrant
“J”.
34
NOTE 17 —
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
income (loss) per share:
|
Three months
ended June 30,
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$(7,703,932)
|
$3,402,623
|
$(11,247,780)
|
Preferred stock
deemed dividend
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,227,247)
|
Numerator for basic
income (loss) per share
|
(1,588,185)
|
(7,703,932)
|
3,402,623
|
(16,475,027)
|
Change in fair
value of Warrants “J” and “K” (note
12)
|
-
|
-
|
(6,289,513)
|
-
|
Numerator for
diluted income (loss) per share
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$(7,703,932)
|
$(2,886,890)
|
$(16,475,027)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for
basic EPS — weighted–average shares
|
18,672,778
|
7,340,942
|
16,586,685
|
6,050,896
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
-
|
-
|
1,512,676
|
-
|
Shares issuable in
January 2018 in connection with the 42West acquisition (Note
4)
|
-
|
-
|
986,330
|
-
|
Denominator for
diluted EPS — adjusted weighted-average shares assuming
exercise of warrants
|
18,672,778
|
7,340,942
|
19,085,691
|
6,050,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss)
per share
|
$(0.08)
|
$(1.76)
|
$0.21
|
$(2.72)
|
Diluted Income
(loss) per share
|
$(0.08)
|
$(1.76)
|
$(0.15)
|
$(2.72)
|
Basic
income (loss) per share is computed by dividing income or loss
attributable to the shareholders of Common Stock (the numerator) by
the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding
(the denominator) for the period. Diluted earnings per share
assumes that any dilutive warrants were exercised and any dilutive
convertible securities outstanding were converted, with related
preferred stock dilution requirements and outstanding Common Stock
adjusted accordingly. For warrants that are carried as liabilities
at fair value, when exercise is assumed in the denominator for
diluted earnings per share, the related change in the fair value of
the warrants recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations for the period, is added back or subtracted from net
income during the period. In periods of losses, diluted loss per
share is computed on the same basis as basic loss per share, as the
inclusion of any other potential shares outstanding would be
anti-dilutive.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, due to the net losses
reported, dilutive common equivalent shares such as warrants were
excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as
inclusion would be anti-dilutive for the periods
presented.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2017, dilutive warrant shares outstanding
were assumed to have been exercised and included in the denominator
for diluted loss per share, and the related gain recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations due to recording the decrease
in fair value of the warrant liabilities during the six-month
period was subtracted from net income to arrive at the numerator
for basic and diluted income (loss) per share. Also for the six
months ended June 30, 2017, the Common Stock that is issuable in
January 2018 in connection with the 42West Acquisition was assumed
to have been issued during the period in arriving at the
denominator for diluted loss per share.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company reflected the preferred
stock deemed dividend of $5,227,247 (note 16) related to exchange
of Series A for Series B Preferred Stock in the numerator for
calculating basic and diluted loss per share, as the loss for
holders of Common Stock would be increased by that amount. Due to
the net losses reported, dilutive common equivalent shares were
excluded from the computation of diluted loss per
share.
NOTE
18 — WARRANTS
A summary of
warrants outstanding at December 31, 2016 and issued, exercised and
expired during the six months ended June 30, 2017 is as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
Exercise
|
Warrants:
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Balance at December
31, 2016
|
5,890,000
|
$2.99
|
Issued
|
—
|
—
|
Exercised
|
2,665,770
|
0.64
|
Expired
|
—
|
—
|
Balance at June 30,
2017
|
3,224,230
|
$4.64
|
35
On March 10, 2010,
T Squared Investments, LLC (“T Squared”) was issued
Warrant “E” for 350,000 shares of the Company at an
exercise price of $5.00 per share with an expiration date of
December 31, 2012. T Squared can continually pay the Company an
amount of money to reduce the exercise price of Warrant
“E” until such time as the exercise price of Warrant
“E” is effectively $0.002 per share. Each time a
payment by T Squared is made to Dolphin, a side letter will be
executed by both parties that states the new effective exercise
price of Warrant “E” at that time. At such time when T
Squared has paid down Warrant “E” to an exercise price
of $0.002 per share or less, T Squared shall have the right to
exercise Warrant “E” via a cashless provision and hold
for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011,
T Squared paid down a total of $1,625,000. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, T Squared paid $50,000 for the issuance of
Warrants G, H and I as described below. Per the provisions of the
Warrant Purchase Agreement, the $50,000 was to reduce the exercise
price of Warrant “E”. On April 13, 2017, T Squared
exercised 325,770 warrants using the cashless exercise provision,
in the warrant agreement and received 325,770 shares of the Common
Stock. Since T Squared applied the $1,675,000 that it had
previously paid the Company to pay down the exercise price of the
warrants, the exercise price for the remaining 24,230 warrants was
recalculated and is currently $3.10 per share of Common Stock. T
Squared did not make any payments during the six months ended June
30, 2017 to reduce the exercise price of the warrants.
During the year
ended December 31, 2012, T Squared agreed to amend a provision in a
preferred stock purchase agreement (the “Preferred Stock
Purchase Agreement”) dated May 2011 that required the Company
to obtain consent from T Squared before issuing any Common Stock
below the existing conversion price as defined in the Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement. As a result, the Company has extended the
expiration date of Warrant “E” (described above) to
September 13, 2015 and on September 13, 2012, the Company issued
350,000 warrants to T Squared (“Warrant “F”) with
an exercise price of $5.00 per share. Under the terms of Warrant
“F”, T Squared has the option to continually pay the
Company an amount of money to reduce the exercise price of Warrant
“F” until such time as the exercise price of Warrant
“F” is effectively $0.002 per share. At such time, T
Squared will have the right to exercise Warrant “F” via
a cashless provision and hold for six months to remove the legend
under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. The Company agreed to extend
both warrants until December 31, 2018 with substantially the same
terms as herein discussed. T Squared did not make any payments
during the six months ended June 30, 2017 to reduce the exercise
price of the warrants.
On September 13,
2012, the Company sold 350,000 warrants with an exercise price of
$5.00 per share and an expiration date of September 13, 2015 for
$35,000. Under the terms of these warrants, the holder has the
option to continually pay the Company an amount of money to reduce
the exercise price of the warrants until such time as the exercise
price is effectively $0.002 per share. At such time, the holder
will have the right to exercise the warrants via a cashless
provision and hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule
144 of the Securities Act. The Company recorded the $35,000 as
additional paid in capital. The Company agreed to extend the
warrants until December 31, 2018 with substantially the same terms
as herein discussed. The holder of the warrants did not make any
payments during the six months ended June 30, 2017 to reduce the
exercise price of the warrants.
On November 4,
2016, the Company issued a Warrant “G”, a Warrant
“H” and a Warrant “I” to T Squared
(“Warrants “G”, “H” and
“I”). A summary of Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I” issued to T Squared is as
follows:
Warrants:
|
Number of
Shares
|
Exercise price
at June 30, 2017
|
Original
Exercise Price
|
Fair Value as of
June 30, 2017
|
Fair Value as of
December 31, 2016
|
Expiration
Date
|
Warrant
“G”
|
1,500,000
|
$4.61
|
$5.00
|
$1,938,202
|
$3,300,671
|
January 31,
2018
|
Warrant
“H”
|
500,000
|
$4.61
|
$6.00
|
902.391
|
1,524,805
|
January 31,
2019
|
Warrant
“I”
|
500,000
|
$4.61
|
$7.00
|
1,330,084
|
1,568,460
|
January 31,
2020
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$4,170,677
|
$6,393,936
|
|
36
The Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” each contain
an antidilution provision which in the event the Company sells
grants or issues any shares, options, warrants, or any instrument
convertible into shares or equity in any form below the then
current exercise price per share of the Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I”, then the then current exercise
price per share for the warrants that are outstanding will be
reduced to such lower price per share. Under the terms of the
Warrants “G”, “H” and “I”, T
Squared has the option to continually pay the Company an amount of
money to reduce the exercise price of any of Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” until such
time as the exercise price of Warrant “G”,
“H” and/or “I” is effectively $0.01 per
share. The Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” are not
registered and will contain a restrictive legend as required by the
Securities Act. At such time when the T Squared has paid down the
warrants to an exercise price of $0.01 per share or less T Squared
will have the right to exercise the Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I” via a cashless provision and
hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act.
On March 30, 2016,
the Company issued shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of
$4.61 per share related to the acquisition of 42West (note 4). As a
result, the exercise price of each of Warrants “G”,
“H” and “I” were reduced to
$4.61.
Due to the
existence of the antidilution provision, the Warrants
“G”, “H” and “I” are carried in
the condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016 as derivative liabilities at fair value (see
note 12)
On December 29,
2016, in connection with the purchase by the Company of 25% of the
outstanding membership interests of Dolphin Kids Club, LLC, the
termination of an Equity Finance Agreement and the debt exchange of
First Loan and Security Notes, Web Series Notes and Second Loan and
Security Notes (See note 8), the Company issued Warrant
“J” and Warrant “K” (Warrants
“J” and “K”) to the seller. Each of the
Warrants “J” and “K” had an exercise price
of $0.15 per share and an expiration date of December 29,
2020.
The Warrants
“J” and “K” each contained an antidilution
provision that in the event the Company sells grants or issues any
shares, options, warrants, or any instrument convertible into
shares or equity in any form below the current exercise price per
share of Warrants “J” and “K”, then the
current exercise price per share for the Warrants “J”
and “K” that are outstanding will be reduced to such
lower price per share. The Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
Warrants “J” and “K” are not registered and
will contain a restrictive legend as required by the Securities
Act. At such time as the exercise price is $0.01 per share or less,
the holder will have the right to exercise the Warrants
“J” and “K” via a cashless provision and
hold for six months to remove the legend under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act.
Due to the
existence of the antidilution provision, the Warrants
“J” and “K” were carried in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 as derivative
liabilities at a fair value of $12,993,342 for Warrant
“J” and $1,017,912 for Warrant “K” (see
note 12). On March 30, 2017, the holders of Warrants J and K
exercised their warrants and were issued 2,340,000 shares of Common
Stock. The Company received $35,100 of proceeds from the
transaction.
NOTE
19— RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On December 31,
2014, the Company and its CEO renewed his employment agreement for
a period of two years commencing January 1, 2015. The agreement
stated that the CEO was to receive annual compensation of $250,000
plus bonus. In addition, the CEO was entitled to an annual
discretionary bonus as determined by the Company’s Board of
Directors. The CEO was eligible to participate in all of the
Company’s benefit plans offered to its employees. As part of
his agreement, he received a $1,000,000 signing bonus in 2012 that
is recorded in accrued compensation on the condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Any unpaid and accrued compensation due to the CEO
under this agreement will accrue interest on the principal amount
at a rate of 10% per annum from the date of this agreement until it
is paid. The agreement included provisions for disability,
termination for cause and without cause by the Company, voluntary
termination by executive and a non-compete clause. The Company
accrued $2,375,000 and $2,250,000 of compensation as accrued
compensation and $849,446 and $735,211 of interest in other current
liabilities on its condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, in relation to Mr.
O’Dowd’s employment. The Company recorded interest
expense related to accrued compensation of $58,236 and $114,235,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
$51,941 and $102,323, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2016, on the condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
37
On October 14,
2015, the Company and Merger Subsidiary, a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company, entered into a merger agreement with Dolphin Films
and DE LLC, both entities owned by a related party. Pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, Merger Subsidiary agreed to merge with and into
Dolphin Films with Dolphin Films surviving the Merger. As a result,
during the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company acquired
Dolphin Films. As consideration for the Merger, the Company issued
2,300,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(“Series B”), par value $0.10 per share, and 1,000,000
shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001
per share to DE LLC.
On March 30, 2017,
in connection with the 42West Acquisition, the Company and Mr.
O’Dowd, as personal guarantor, entered into four separate Put
Agreements with each of the Sellers of 42West, pursuant to which
the Company has granted each of the Sellers the right to cause the
Company to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,374,187 of their shares
of Common Stock received as Consideration for a purchase price
equal to $4.61 per share during certain specified exercise periods
up until December 2020. Pursuant to the terms of one such Put
Agreement between Mr. Allan Mayer, a member of the board of
directors of the Company, and the Company, Mr. Mayer exercised Put
Rights and caused the Company to purchase 43,382 shares of Common
Stock at a purchase price of $4.61 for an aggregate amount of
$200,000, during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
On March 30, 2017,
KCF Investments LLC and BBCF 2011 LLC, entities under the common
control of Mr. Stephen L Perrone, an affiliate of the Company,
exercised Warrants “J” and “K” and were
issued an aggregate of 2,340,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.015 per share.
NOTE
20 — SEGMENT INFORMATION
As a result of the
42West Acquisition (note 4), the Company has determined that as of
the second quarter of 2017, it operates two reportable segments,
the Entertainment Publicity Division (“EPD”) and the
Content Production Division (“CPD”). The EPD segment is
comprised of 42West and provides clients with diversified services,
including public relations, entertainment content marketing and
strategic marketing consulting. CPD is comprised of Dolphin
Entertainment, Dolphin Films, and Dolphin Digital Studios and
specializes in the production and distribution of digital content
and feature films.
The profitability
measure employed by our chief operating decision maker for
allocating resources to operating divisions and assessing operating
division performance is operating income (loss). All segments
follow the same accounting policies as those described in Note
3.
Salaries and
related expenses include salaries, bonus, commission and other
incentive related expenses. Legal and professional expenses
primarily include professional fees related to financial statement
audits, legal, investor relations and other consulting services,
which are engaged and managed by each of the segments. In addition,
general and administrative expenses include rental expense and
depreciation of property, equipment and leasehold improvements for
properties occupied by corporate office employees.
In
connection with the 42West Acquisition, the Company assigned
$9,110,000 of intangible assets, less the amortization during the
three months ended June 30, 2017 of $249,333, and Goodwill of
$14,336,919 to the EPD segment.
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
2017
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
EPD
|
$5,137,556
|
$5,137,556
|
CPD
|
2,694,096
|
3,226,962
|
Total
|
$7,831,652
|
$8,364,518
|
Segment operating income (loss):
|
|
|
EPD
|
$697,679
|
$697,679
|
CPD
|
(604,099)
|
(1,476,772)
|
Total
|
93,580
|
(779,093)
|
Interest
expense
|
(396,864)
|
(849,001)
|
Other
(expense) income, net
|
(1,254,901)
|
5,030,717
|
Income before income taxes
|
$(1,558,185)
|
$3,402,623
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
EPD
|
$27,301,487
|
|
CPD
|
8,243,407
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$35,544,894
|
|
38
|
June 30,
|
|
2017
|
Total assets:
|
|
EPD
|
$27,435,905
|
CPD
|
7,943,407
|
|
|
Total
|
$35,379,312
|
|
|
NOTE
21 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
On or about January
25, 2010, an action was filed by Tom David against Winterman Group
Limited, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd., Malcolm Stockdale and
Sara Stockdale in the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario (Canada)
alleging breach of a commercial lease and breach of a personal
guaranty. On or about March 18, 2010, Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale filed a Statement of Defense
and Crossclaim. In the Statement of Defense, Winterman Group
Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale denied any liability
under the lease and guaranty. In the Crossclaim filed against
Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd., Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale seek contribution or indemnity
against Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) Ltd. alleging that Dolphin
Digital Media (Canada) agreed to relieve Winterman Group Limited,
Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale from any and all liability
with respect to the lease or the guaranty. On or about March 19,
2010, Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale
filed a Third-Party Claim against the Company seeking contribution
or indemnity against the Company, formerly known as Logica
Holdings, Inc., alleging that the Company agreed to relieve
Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale from
any and all liability with respect to the lease or the guaranty.
The Third-Party Claim was served on the Company on April 6, 2010.
On or about April 1, 2010, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) filed a
Statement of Defense and Crossclaim. In the Statement of Defense,
Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) denied any liability under the lease
and in the Crossclaim against Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm
Stockdale and Sara Stockdale, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada) seeks
contribution or indemnity against Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm
Stockdale and Sara Stockdale alleging that the leased premises were
used by Winterman Group Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara
Stockdale for their own use. On or about April 1, 2010, Dolphin
Digital Media (Canada) also filed a Statement of Defense to the
Crossclaim denying any liability to indemnify Winterman Group
Limited, Malcolm Stockdale and Sara Stockdale. The ultimate results
of these proceedings against the Company cannot be predicted with
certainty. On or about March 12, 2012, the Court served a Status
Notice on all the parties indicating that since more than (2) years
had passed since a defense in the action had been filed, the case
had not been set for trial and the case had not been terminated,
the case would be dismissed for delay unless action was taken
within ninety (90) days of the date of service of the notice. The
Company has not filed for a motion to dismiss and no further action
has been taken in the case. The ultimate results of these
proceedings against the Company could result in a loss ranging from
0 to $325,000. On March 23, 2012, Dolphin Digital Media (Canada)
Ltd filed for bankruptcy in Canada. The bankruptcy will not protect
the Company from the Third-Party Claim filed against it. However,
the Company has not accrued for this loss because it believes that
the claims against it are without substance and it is not probable
that they will result in loss. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has
not received any other notifications related to this
action.
A putative class
action was filed on May 5, 2017, in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida by Kenneth and Emily
Reel on behalf of a purported nationwide class of individuals who
attended the Fyre Music Festival, or the Fyre Festival, in the
Bahamas on April 28-30, 2017. The complaint names several
defendants, including 42West, along with the organizers of the Fyre
Festival, Fyre Media Inc. and Fyre Festival LLC, individuals
related to Fyre, and another entity called Matte Projects LLC. The
complaint alleges that the Fyre Festival was promoted by Fyre as a
luxurious experience through an extensive marketing campaign
orchestrated by Fyre and executed with the assistance of outside
marketing companies, 42West and Matte, but that the reality of the
festival did not live up to the luxury experience that it was
represented to be. The plaintiffs assert claims for fraud,
negligent misrepresentation and for violation of several
states’ consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs seek to
certify a nationwide class action comprised of “All persons
or entities that purchased a Fyre Festival 2017 ticket or package
or that attended, or planned to attend, Fyre Festival 2017”
and seek damages in excess of $5,000,000 on behalf of themselves
and the class. The plaintiffs sought to consolidate this
action with five other class actions also arising out of the Fyre
Festival (to which 42West is not a party) in a Multi District
Litigation proceeding, which request was denied by the panel. We
believe the claims against 42West are without merit and that we
have strong defenses to the claims.
Tax Filings
For the year ended
December 31, 2011, the Company accrued $120,000 for estimated
penalties associated with not filing certain information returns.
The penalties per return are $10,000 per entity per year. The
Company received notification from the Internal Revenue Service
concerning information returns for the year ended December 31,
2009. The Company responded with a letter stating reasonable cause
for the noncompliance and requested that penalties be abated.
During 2012, the Company received a notice stating that the
reasonable cause had been denied. The Company decided to pay the
penalties and not appeal the decision for the 2009 Internal Revenue
Service notification. There is no associated interest expense as
the tax filings are for information purposes only and would not
result in further income taxes to be paid by the Company. The
Company made payments in the amount of $40,000 during the year
ended December 31, 2012 related to these penalties. At each of
March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had a remainder
of $40,000 in accruals related to these late filing penalties which
is presented as a component of other current
liabilities.
39
Kids Club
Effective February
1, 2017, the Company notified US Youth Soccer Association, Inc.,
with whom it had entered into an agreement to create, design and
host the US Youth Soccer Clubhouse website, that it would not renew
the agreement. The Company did not record any revenues or expenses
related to this website for the three months ended March 31, 2017
and 2016.
On July 1, 2016,
the Company and United Way Worldwide mutually agreed to terminate
the agreement and agreement create and host an online kids club to
promote United Way’s philanthropic philosophy and encourage
literacy programs. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the
Company was responsible for the creation and marketing of the
website, developing and managing the sponsorship package, and
hiring of certain employees to administer the program. Each school
sponsorship package was $10,000 with the Company earning $1,250.
The remaining funds were used for program materials and the costs
of other partners. During the six months ended June 30, 2017,
management decided to discontinue the online kids clubs at the end
of 2017.
The Company recorded revenues of $3,750 and
$21,028 related to the online kids clubs during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2016. There were no revenues generated by the
online kids clubs during the three and six months ended June 30,
2017.
Incentive Compensation Plan
During the year
ended December 31, 2012, the Company’s Board and a majority
of its shareholders approved the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan was
enacted as a way of attracting and retaining exceptional employees
and consultants by enabling them to share in the long term growth
and financial success of the Company. The 2012 Plan will be
administered by the Board or a committee designated by the Board.
As part of an increase in authorized shares approved by the Board
in 2012, 500,000 shares of Common Stock were designated for the
2012 Plan. No awards have been issued and, as such, the Company had
not recorded any liability or equity related to the 2012 Plan as of
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
On June 29,
2017, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2017 Plan. The
2017 Plan was adopted as a flexible incentive compensation plan
that would allow us to use different forms of compensation awards
to attract new employees, executives and directors, to further the
goal of retaining and motivating existing personnel and directors
and to further align such individuals’ interests with those
of the Company’s shareholders. Under the 2017 Plan, the total
number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for
delivery under the 2017 Plan (the “Awards”), at any
time during the term of the 2017 Plan, will be 2,000,000 shares of
Common Stock. The 2017 Plan imposes individual limitations on the
amount of certain Awards, in part with the intention to comply with
Section 162(m) of the Code. Under these limitations, in any fiscal
year of the Company during any part of which the 2017 Plan is in
effect, no participant may be granted (i) stock options or stock
appreciation rights with respect to more than 600,000 Shares, or
(ii) performance shares (including shares of restricted stock,
restricted stock units, and other stock based-awards that are
subject to satisfaction of performance goals) that the Committee
intends to be exempt from the deduction limitations under Section
162(m) of the Code, with respect to more than 600,000 Shares, in
each case, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The
maximum amount that may be paid out to any one participant as
performance units that the Committee intends to be exempt from the
deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code, with
respect to any 12-month performance period is $1,000,000 (pro-rated
for any performance period that is less than 12 months), and with
respect to any performance period that is more than 12 months,
$2,000,000. No Awards were issued during the six months ended June
30, 2017, and, as such, the Company has not recorded any liability
or equity related to the 2017 Plan as of June 30,
2017.
40
Employee Benefit Plan
The
Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, 42West, has a 401(K)
profit sharing plan that covers substantially all employees of
42West. Contributions to the plan are at discretion of
management. The Company’s contributions were approximately
$148,068 and $74,954 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2017, respectively.
Employment Contracts
During 2015, 42West
entered into seven separate three-year employment contracts with
senior level management employees. The contracts define each
individual’s compensation, along with specific salary
increases mid-way through the term of each contract. Each
individual was also guaranteed a percentage of proceeds if 42West
was sold during the term of their contract. The percentages vary by
executive. Termination for cause, death or by the employee would
terminate the Company’s commitment on each of the
contracts.
As a condition to
the closing of the 42West Acquisition described in note 4, each of
the three Principal Sellers has entered into employment agreements
(the “Employment Agreements”) with the Company and will
continue as employees of the Company for a three-year term. Each of
the Employment Agreements provides for a base salary with annual
increases and bonuses if certain performance targets are met. In
addition, the Employment Agreements grant each Principal Seller an
annual stock bonus of $200,000 to be calculated using the 30-day
trading average of the Company’s Common Stock. The Employment
Agreements also contain provisions for termination and as a result
of death or disability. During the term of the Employment
Agreement, the Principal Sellers shall be entitled to participate
in all employee benefit plans, practices and programs maintained by
the Company as well as be entitled to paid vacation in accordance
with the Company’s policy. Each of the Employment Agreements
contains lock-up provisions pursuant to which each Principal Seller
has agreed not to transfer any shares of Common Stock in the first
year, no more than 1/3 of the Initial Consideration and
Post-Closing Consideration received by such Seller in the second
year and no more than an additional 1/3 of the Initial
Consideration and Post-Closing Consideration received by such
Seller in the third year, following the closing date of the 42West
Acquisition.
Talent, Director and Producer Participations
Per agreements with
talent, directors and producers on certain projects, the Company
will be responsible for bonus and back end payments upon release of
a motion picture and achieving certain box office performance as
determined by the individual agreements. The Company cannot
estimate the amounts that will be due as these are based on future
box office performance. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
the Company had not recorded any liability related to these
participations.
Leases
42West is obligated
under an operating lease agreement for office space in New York,
expiring in December 2026. The lease is secured by a standby
letter of credit amounting to $677,354, and provides for increases
in rent for real estate taxes and building operating costs. The
lease also contains a renewal option for an additional five
years.
42West is obligated
under an operating lease agreement for office space in California,
expiring in December 2021. The lease is secured by a cash security
deposit of $44,788 and a standby letter of credit amounting to
$100,000 at March 31, 2017. The lease also provides for increases
in rent for real estate taxes and operating expenses, and contains
a renewal option for an additional five years, as well as an early
termination option effective as of February 1, 2019. Should
the early termination option be executed, the Company will be
subject to a termination fee in the amount of approximately
$637,000. The Company does not expect to execute such
option.
On November 1,
2011, the Company entered into a 60 month lease agreement for
office space in Miami with an unrelated party. The lease expired on
October 31, 2016 and the Company extended the lease until September
30, 2017 with substantially the same terms as the original lease.
The Company is negotiating to extend the term of the lease until
December 31, 2017.
41
On June 1, 2014,
the Company entered into a 62 month lease agreement for office
space in Los Angeles, California. The monthly rent is $13,746 with
annual increases of 3% for years 1-3 and 3.5% for the remainder of
the lease. The Company is also entitled to four half months of free
rent over the life of the agreement. On June 1, 2017, the Company
entered into an agreement to sublease the office space in Los
Angeles, California. The sublease is effective June 1, 2017 through
July 31, 2019 and the Company will receive (i) $14,891.50 per month
for the first twelve months, with the first two months of rent
abated and (ii) $15,338.25 per month for the remainder of the
sublease.
Future minimum
annual rent payments are as follows:
Period ended June
30, 2017
|
|
July 1, 2017
– December 31, 2017
|
$550,090
|
2018
|
1,308,209
|
2019
|
1,327,992
|
2020
|
1,433,403
|
2021
|
1,449,019
|
Thereafter
|
4,675,844
|
|
$10,744,558
|
Rent expense,
including escalation charges, amounted to approximately $576,197
and $631,975, respectively, for the three and six months ended June
30, 2017.
Motion Picture Industry Pension Accrual
42West is a
contributing employer to the Motion Picture Industry Pension
Individual Account and Health Plans (collectively the
“Plans”), two multiemployer pension funds and one
multiemployer welfare fund, respectively, that are governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The
Plans intend to conduct an audit of 42West’s books and
records for the period June 7, 2011 through August 20, 2016 in
connection with the alleged contribution obligations to the Plans.
Based on a recent audit for periods prior to June 7, 2011, 42West
expects that the Plan may seek to collect approximately $300,000 in
pension plan contributions, health and welfare plan contributions
and union once the audit is completed. The Company believes the
exposure to be probable and has recognized this liability in other
current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as
of June 30, 2017.
NOTE
22 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 1, 2017,
the Company notified nine employees that they would be taken off
the Company’s payroll until the Company green lights a
project for production.
On July 10, 2017,
one of the Principal Sellers of 42 West exercised a Put Right and
caused the Company to purchase 16,269 shares of Common Stock for
$75,000.
On July 18, 2017,
the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement
with an unrelated third party and received $250,000. The note bears
interest at 10% per annum and matures on July 19, 2018. The holder
of the convertible note has the right to convert all or a portion
of the Principal and any accrued interest into shares of common
stock of the Company at price which is (i) the 90 trading-day
average price per share as of the date of the Notice of Conversion
or (ii) if an Eligible Offering, as defined in the agreement has
occurred, 95% of the public offering share price.
On July 26, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $250,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note (the
“Note”) is for a period of one year and bears interest
at 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of the
Note are convertible by the holder at a price of either (i) 90 day
average trailing trading price of the stock or (ii) if an Eligible
Offering of the Company’s stock (as defined in the Note) is
made, 95% of the Public Offering Share price as defined in the
Note.
42
On August 1, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $25,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note (the
“Note”) is for a period of one year and bears interest
at 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of the
Note are convertible by the holder at a price of either (i) 90 day
trailing trading price of the stock or (ii) if an Eligible Offering
of the Company’s stock (as defined in the Note) is made, 95%
of the Public Offering Share price as defined in the
Note.
On August 2, 2017,
the Company agreed to pay an invoice in the amount of $28,856 using
5,771 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per share. On
August 2, 2017, the price of our stock was $4.75. The Company
recorded other income of $1,443 on its consolidated statement of
operations.
On August 4, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $50,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note (the
“Note”) is for a period of one year and bears interest
at 10% per annum. The principal and any accrued interest of the
Note are convertible by the holder at a price of either (i) 90 day
trailing trading price of the stock or (ii) if an Eligible Offering
of the Company’s stock (as defined in the Note) is made, 95%
of the Public Offering Share price as defined in the
Note.
On August 21,
2017, the Company issued 118,640 shares of Common Stock to certain
employees, pursuant to the 42 West Acquisition and as part of the
2017 Plan.
ITEM
2.
|
|
MANAGEMENT
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
OVERVIEW
We are a leading
independent entertainment marketing and premium content development
company. Through our recent acquisition of 42West, we provide
expert strategic marketing and publicity services to all of the
major film studios, and many of the leading independent and digital
content providers, as well as for hundreds of A-list celebrity
talent, including actors, directors, producers, recording artists,
athletes and authors. The strategic acquisition of 42West brings
together premium marketing services with premium content
development, creating significant opportunities to serve our
respective constituents more strategically and to grow and
diversify our business.
On March 7, 2016,
we acquired Dolphin Films, a content producer of motion pictures
from DE LLC, an entity wholly owned by our President, Chairman and
CEO, Mr. O’Dowd. All financial information has been
retrospectively adjusted at the historical values of Dolphin Films,
as the merger was between entities under common
control.
On May 9, 2016, we
filed Articles of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation with
the Secretary of State of the State of Florida to effectuate a
1-to-20 reverse stock split. The reverse stock split was effective
as of May 10, 2016. The reverse stock split was approved by our
Board of Directors and a majority of our shareholders. Shares of
Common Stock, have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the
reverse stock split in the following management
discussion.
On June 29, 2017,
we obtained the votes from our shareholder to change our name to
Dolphin Entertainment, Inc., as had previously been approved by our
Board of Directors.
On March 30, 2017,
we acquired 42West, an entertainment public relations agency
offering talent publicity, strategic communications and
entertainment content marketing. As consideration for the 42West
Acquisition, we paid approximately $18.7 million in shares of
Common Stock, based on the Company’s 30-trading-day average
stock price prior to the closing date of $4.61 per share (less
certain working capital and closing adjustments, transaction
expenses and payments of indebtedness), plus the potential to earn
up to an additional $9.3 million in shares of Common Stock. As a
result, (i) we issued (a) 1,230,280 shares of Common Stock on the
closing date and (b) 344,550 shares of Common Stock to certain
employees on April 13, 2017 (c) 100,000 shares of Common Stock as a
provisional working capital adjustment to the purchase price
pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement and (ii)we plan to
issue (a) 118,655 shares of Common Stock as bonuses during 2017 and
(b) approximately 1,961,821 shares of Common Stock on January 2,
2018. In addition, we may issue up to 1,963,126 shares of Common
Stock based on the achievement of specified financial performance
targets over a three-year period. Prior to its acquisition, 42West
was the largest independently-owned public relations firm in the
entertainment industry. Among other benefits, we anticipate that
the 42West Acquisition will strengthen and complement our current
digital and motion picture business, while expanding and
diversifying our operations. Having marketing expertise in-house
will allow Dolphin to review any prospective project’s
marketing potential prior to making a production
commitment.
The Principal
Sellers have each entered into employment agreements with us and
will continue as employees of the Company for a three-year term
after the closing date of the 42West Acquisition. The nonexecutive
employees of 42West were retained as well. In connection with the
42West Acquisition, we granted the sellers the right, but not the
obligation, to cause the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of
2,374,187 of their shares of Common Stock received as Consideration
for a purchase price equal to $4.61 per share during certain
specified exercise periods up until December 2020. During the six
months ended June 30, 2017, the sellers exercised certain of these
rights and caused the company to purchase 151,837 shares of Common
Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $700,000. On July 10,
2017, one of the sellers exercised a put right and the Company
purchased 16,268 shares of Common Stock for $75,000.
43
In connection with
the acquisition of 42West, we acquired an estimated $9.1 million of
intangible assets and recorded approximately $14 million of
goodwill. The purchase price allocation and related consideration
for the intangible assets and goodwill are provisional and subject
to completion and adjustment. We amortize our intangible assets
over useful lives of between 3 and 10 years. We have recorded
amortization in the amount of approximately $0.2 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2017.
As a result of the
42West Acquisition, we have determined that as of the second
quarter of 2017, we operate in two reportable segments, the
Entertainment Publicity Division (“EPD”) and the
Content Production Division (“CPD”). The EPD segment is
comprised of 42West and provides clients with diversified services,
including public relations, entertainment content marketing and
strategic marketing consulting. CPD is comprised of Dolphin
Entertainment, Dolphin Films, and Dolphin Digital Studios and
specializes in the production and distribution of digital content
and feature films.
Going Concern
In the audit
opinion for our financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016, our independent auditors included an explanatory
paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern based upon our net loss for the year
ended December 31, 2016, our accumulated deficit as of December 31,
2016 and our level of working capital. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
these uncertainties. Management is planning to raise any necessary
additional funds through loans and additional sales of our Common
Stock, securities convertible into our Common Stock, debt
securities or a combination of such financing alternatives;
however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in
raising any necessary additional loans or capital. Such issuances
of additional securities would further dilute the equity interests
of our existing shareholders, perhaps substantially.
Revenues
During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2017, we derived the majority of our
revenues from our recently acquired subsidiary 42West. 42West
derives its revenues from providing talent publicity, strategic
communications and entertainment content marketing. 42West was
acquired on March 30, 2017 and, as such, the revenues reported
herein are only those derived during the three months ended June
30, 2017. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,
revenues from production and distribution were derived from the
release of our motion picture, Max
Steel. By contrast, during the three months ended March 31,
2016, revenues were derived from a portion of fees obtained from
the sale of memberships to online kids clubs. The table below sets
forth the components of revenue for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
||
Revenues:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Production
and distribution
|
34.4%
|
51.6%
|
38.6%
|
16.5%
|
Entertainment
publicity
|
65.6%
|
n/a
|
61.4%
|
n/a
|
Membership
|
-
|
48.4%
|
-
|
83.5%
|
Total
revenue
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Total
revenues (in USD)
|
$7,831,652
|
$7,750
|
$8,364,518
|
$25,185
|
Production and Distribution
Dolphin Digital Studios
In April of 2016,
we entered into a co-production agreement to produce Jack of all Tastes, a digital project
that showcases favorite restaurants of NFL players. The show was
produced during 2016 throughout several cities in the US and we
anticipate that it will be available for distribution during the
fourth quarter of 2017. We are currently sourcing distribution
platforms in which to release projects currently in production and
those for which we have the rights and which we intend to produce.
We earn production and online distribution revenue solely through
the following:
Producer’s Fees: We earn
fees for producing each web series, as included in the production
budget for each project. We either recognize producer’s fees
on a percentage of completion or a completed contract basis
depending on the terms of the producer agreements, which we
negotiate on a project by project basis. During 2016, we began
production of our new web series but it had not been completed as
of June 30, 2017. In addition, we concentrated our efforts in
identifying potential distribution partners.
44
Initial
Distribution/Advertising Revenue: We earn
revenues from the distribution of online content on Ad-based
video-on-demand (“AVOD”) platforms. Distribution
agreements contain revenue sharing provisions which permit the
producer to retain a percentage of all domestic and international
advertising revenue generated from the online distribution of a
particular web series. Typically, these rates range from 30% to 45%
of such revenue. We have previously distributed our productions on
various online platforms including Yahoo! and Facebook and Hulu. No
revenues from this source have been derived during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
Secondary Distribution Revenue: Once our
contractual obligation with the initial online distribution
platform expires, we have the ability to derive revenues from
distributions of the web series in ancillary markets such as
digital-video-disc (“DVD”), television and
subscription-video-on-demand (“SVOD”). No revenues from
this source have been derived during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017 and 2016. We intend to source potential secondary
distribution partners for our web series, South Beach - Fever, that was released
in 2015, once our agreement with the initial distributor
expires.
Dolphin Films
During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2017, we derived revenues from
Dolphin Films primarily through the domestic and international
distribution of our motion picture Max Steel.
The production of
the motion picture Max
Steel was completed during 2015 and released in the United
States on October 14, 2016. The motion picture did not perform as
well as expected domestically but we have secured approximately
$8.2 million in international distribution agreements. Unamortized
film costs are to be tested for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the film
may be less than its unamortized costs. We determined that
Max Steel’s domestic
performance was an indicator that the capitalized production costs
may need to be impaired. We used a discounted cash flow model to
help determine the fair value of the capitalized production costs
and determined that the carrying value of the capitalized
production costs were below the fair value and recorded an
impairment of $2 million during 2016.
Revenues from the
motion picture Max Steel, were, and are expected to be generated
from the following sources:
●
Theatrical – Theatrical
revenues were derived from the domestic theatrical release of
motion pictures licensed to a U.S. theatrical distributor that has
existing agreements with theatrical exhibitors. The financial terms
negotiated with its U.S. theatrical distributor provide that we
receive a percentage of the box office results, after related
distribution fees.
●
International –
International revenues were and are expected to be derived through
license agreements with international distributors to distribute
our motion pictures in an agreed upon territory for an agreed upon
time. Several of the international distribution agreements were
contingent on a domestic wide release that occurred on October 14,
2016.
●
Other – Dolphin
Films’ U.S. theatrical distributor has existing output
arrangements for the distribution of productions to home
entertainment, video-on-demand (“VOD”), pay-per-view)
(“PPV”), electronic-sell-through (“EST”),
SVOD and free and pay television markets. The revenues expected to
be derived from these channels are based on the performance of the
motion picture in the domestic box office. We anticipate the
revenues from these channels will be received in 2017 and
thereafter.
Our ability to
receive additional revenues from Max Steel will depend on our
ability to repay our loans under our production service agreement
and prints and advertising loan agreement. We do not
currently have sufficient funds to repay such loans when they
become due. If we are unable to repay such loans when they
become due, we will lose our copyright to the film and will no
longer receive revenues related to Max Steel. For a discussion of
the terms of such agreements, see “Liquidity and Capital
Resources” below.
Project Development and Related Services
We have a
development team that dedicates a portion of its time and resources
to sourcing scripts for future developments. The scripts can be for
either digital or motion picture productions. During 2015 and 2016,
we acquired the rights to certain scripts, one that we intend to
produce in the fourth quarter of 2017 and the others in 2018.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we acquired the rights
to a book from which we intend to develop a script and produce in
2018. We have not yet determined if these projects would be
produced for digital or theatrical distribution.
45
Entertainment publicity
Our revenue is
directly impacted by the retention and spending levels of existing
clients and by our ability to win new clients. We have a stable
client base and continue to grow organically through referrals and
actively soliciting new business. Our revenues are primarily earned
from three sources:
Talent Publicity –
We
earn fees from creating and implementing strategic communication
campaigns for performers and entertainers, including television and
film stars, recording artists, authors, models, athletes, and
theater actors. Our talent roster includes Oscar- and Emmy-winning
actors and Grammy-winning singers and musicians and New York Times
best-selling authors. Our services in this area include
ongoing strategic counsel, media relations, studio, network,
charity, corporate liaison and event and tour support. Many of our
clients have been with 42West since it was founded in 2004.
Our services may be ongoing or related to a specific project that
our talent is associated with.
Entertainment Content Marketing
– We earn fees from
providing marketing direction, public relations counsel and media
strategy for productions (including theatrical films, DVD and VOD
releases, television programs, and online series) as well as
content producers ranging from individual filmmakers and creative
artists to production companies, film financiers, DVD distributors,
and other entities. Our capabilities include worldwide studio
releases, independent films, television programming and web
productions. In addition, we provide entertainment marketing
services in connection with film festivals, awards campaigns, event
publicity and red carpet management. As part of our services we
offer marketing and publicity services that are tailored to reach
diverse audiences. Our clients for this type of service may include
major studios and independent producers for whom they create
strategic multicultural marketing campaigns and provide strategic
guidance aimed at reaching diverse audiences.
Strategic Communication –
We earn fees through our strategic communications team by advising
high-profile individuals and companies faced with sensitive
situations or looking to raise, reposition, or rehabilitate their
public profiles. We also help studios and filmmakers deal with
controversial movies.
Much of our
team’s activities involve orchestrating high-stakes
communications campaigns in response to sensitive, complex
situations. We also help companies define objectives, develop
messaging, create brand identities, and construct long-term
strategies to achieve specific goals, as well as manage functions
such as media relations or internal communications on a day-to-day
basis. Our strategic communications team focuses on strategic
communications counsel, corporate positioning, brand enhancement,
media relations, reputation and issues management, litigation
support and crisis management and communications. Our clients
include major studios and production companies, record labels,
sports franchises, media conglomerates, technology companies,
philanthropic organizations, talent guilds, and trade associations
as well as a wide variety of high-profile individuals, ranging from
major movie and pop stars to top executives and
entrepreneurs.
Membership
Online Kids Clubs
We partnered with
US Youth Soccer, in 2012, and United Way Worldwide, in 2013, to
create online kids clubs. Our online kids clubs derive revenue from
the sale of memberships in the online kids clubs to various
individuals and organizations. We shared in a portion of the
membership fees as outlined in our agreements with the respective
entities. During 2016, we terminated, by mutual accord the
agreement with United Way Worldwide. We have retained the trademark
to the online kids club and will continue to operate the site.
Pursuant to the terms of our agreement with US Youth Soccer, we
notified them that we did not intend to renew our agreement that
terminated on February 1, 2017. For the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2017 we did not derive any revenues from the online
kids clubs. During the three and six months ended June 30 2016, we
recorded $0.01 million and $0.02 million of revenues from the
online kids clubs. We operate our online kids club activities
through our subsidiary, Dolphin Kids Clubs, LLC (“Dolphin
Kids Clubs”). During the six months ended June 30, 2017,
management decided to discontinue the online kids clubs at the end
of this year to dedicate a majority of our time and resources to
the entertainment publicity business and the production of feature
films and digital content.
46
Expenses
Our expenses
consist primarily of (1) direct costs, (2) distribution and
marketing (3) selling, general and administrative expenses (4)
legal and professional fees and (5) payroll expenses.
Direct costs
include certain cost of services related to our entertainment
publicity business, amortization of deferred production costs,
impairment of deferred production costs, and other costs associated
with production. Included within direct costs are immaterial
impairments for any of our projects. Capitalized production costs
are recorded at the lower of their cost, less accumulated
amortization and tax incentives, or fair value. If estimated
remaining revenue is not sufficient to recover the unamortized
capitalized production costs for that title, the unamortized
capitalized production costs will be written down to fair
value.
Distribution and
marketing expenses include distributor fees to distribute the
feature film, residuals and other costs associated with the
distribution of our feature films. Residuals represent amounts
payable to various unions or “guilds” such as the
Screen Actors Guild, Directors Guild of America, and Writers Guild
of America, based on the performance of the digital production in
certain ancillary markets.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses include all overhead costs except for
payroll and legal and professional fees which are reported as a
separate expense item.
Legal and
professional fees include fees paid to our attorneys, fees for
investor relations consultants, audit and accounting fees and fees
for general business consultants.
Payroll expenses
include wages, payroll taxes and employee benefits.
Other Income and Expenses
Other income and
expenses consist primarily of (i) interest payments to DE LLC, an
entity owned by our CEO, in connection with loans made to the
Company; (ii) interest payments related to the Loan and Security
Agreements entered into to finance the production of certain
digital content and motion pictures (iii) loss on extinguishment of
debt (iv) amortization of loan fees, (v) changes in the fair value
of warrant liabilities (vi) change in fair value of put rights
(vii) change in fair value of contingent consideration and(viii)
loss from disposal of furniture, office equipment and leasehold
improvements.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three
and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016
Revenues
During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2017, we derived the majority of our
revenues from our recently acquired subsidiary 42West. 42West
was acquired on March 30, 2017 and, as such, the revenues reported
herein are only those derived during the three months ended June
30, 2017. During the three and six months ended June
30, 2017, revenues from production and distribution were derived
from the release of our motion picture, Max Steel. By contrast, during
the three months ended March 31, 2016, revenues were derived from a
portion of fees obtained from the sale of memberships to online
kids clubs. The table below sets forth the components of revenue
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and
2016:
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
||
Revenues:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Production
and distribution
|
$2,694,096
|
$4,000
|
$3,226,962
|
$4,157
|
Entertainment
publicity
|
5,137,556
|
n/a
|
5,137,556
|
n/a
|
Membership
|
-
|
3,750
|
-
|
21,028
|
Total
revenues (in USD)
|
$7,831,652
|
$7,750
|
$8,364,518
|
$25,185
|
47
Revenues from
production and distribution increased by $2.7 million and $3.2
million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30,
2017 as compared to the same quarter in the prior year primarily
due to the revenue generated by the domestic (including theatrical
and home entertainment) and international distribution of
Max Steel.
Membership revenues
decreased by $0.02 million during the six months ended June 30,
2017 as compared to the same period in prior year mainly due to
promotional efforts made by a consultant that we hired to promote
Club Connect. That consultant is no longer providing services to
the Company and we have decided to discontinue the online kids
clubs and concentrate our efforts on entertainment publicity and
production and distribution of feature film and digital
content.
Expenses
For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017, our primary operating expenses were
(i) direct costs, (ii) distribution and marketing (iii) selling,
general and administrative expenses, (iv) legal and professional
fees and (v) payroll expenses. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2016, our primary operating expenses were (i) selling,
general and administrative expenses, (ii) legal and professional
fees and (iii) payroll expenses. Expenses of our newly
acquired subsidiary, 42West are only for the three month period
(April 1, 2017 – June 30, 2017) subsequent to the acquisition
on March 30.
|
For the three months ended June 30,
|
For the six months ended June 30,
|
||
Expenses:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Direct
costs
|
$2,070,529
|
$-
|
$2,500,772
|
$2,429
|
Distribution
and marketing
|
559,210
|
-
|
629,493
|
-
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,020,807
|
523,014
|
1,213,400
|
562,576
|
Payroll
|
3,466,157
|
363,756
|
3,802,511
|
751,202
|
Legal
and professional
|
621,369
|
394,358
|
997,434
|
967,531
|
Total
expenses
|
$7,738,072
|
$1,281,128
|
$9,143,610
|
$2,238,738
|
Direct costs
increased by approximately $2.0 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as
compared to the same periods in the prior year, mainly due to (i)
the amortization of capitalized production costs related to the
revenues earned from our motion picture, Max Steel and (ii) approximately $0.4
million of cost of services attributed to 42West.
Distribution and
marketing expenses increased by approximately $0.6 million for each
of the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the
same period in prior years due to expenses, such as distributor
fees and residuals, related to the distribution of Max Steel.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses increased by approximately $0.5 million
and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017
as compared to the same quarter in the prior year. For each of the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017, approximately $0.8
million of selling, general and administrative expenses are
attributable to 42West, which were offset by a decrease of $0.3
million in the same period in the prior year primarily attributable
to (i) a charitable contribution of $0.1 million made during the
three months ended June 30, 2016 and (ii) selling costs for
Max Steel of $0.2 million
prior to its release. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 as
compared to the same period in the prior year, there was a decrease
of $0.1 million primarily due to a charitable contribution made
during the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Legal and
professional expenses increased by approximately $0.3 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period
in the prior year primarily due to (i) fees paid for due diligence
work related to financing that was later abandoned (ii) fees paid
for consulting related to accounting treatment of certain
transactions and (iii) increase in audit-related fees.
48
Payroll expenses
increased by approximately $3.1 million for each of the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same periods in
prior years. For each of the three and six months ended June 30,
2017, approximately $3.1 million of payroll expenses are
attributable to 42West, which were offset by a decrease of
approximately $0.1 million in payroll expenses, as compared to the
same periods in the prior year, primarily due to a reduction of
headcount during the second quarter of 2016.
Other
Income and expenses
|
For the three months ended
June 30,
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
||
Other (Income) Expense:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Other
(income) and expenses
|
$16,000
|
$-
|
$16,000
|
$(9,660)
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
249,333
|
-
|
249,333
|
-
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
4,167
|
4,652,443
|
4,167
|
5,843,811
|
Loss
on disposal of furniture, office equipment and leasehold
improvements
|
28,025
|
-
|
28,025
|
-
|
Acquisition
costs
|
207,564
|
-
|
745,272
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
533,812
|
-
|
(6,289,513)
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of contingent consideration
|
116,000
|
-
|
116,000
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of put rights
|
100,000
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
Interest
expense
|
396,864
|
1,778,111
|
849,001
|
3,155,076
|
Other
Income/expense
|
$1,651,765
|
$6,430,554
|
$(4,181,715)
|
$8,989,227
|
As a result of our
acquisition of 42West, we recognized certain intangible assets from
our trade name and client relationships. On each of the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017, we amortized $249,333 of intangible
assets based on useful lives estimated to be between 3 and 10
years.
Interest expense
decreased by approximately $1.3 million and $2.3 million,
respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as
compared to the same period in the prior year and was directly
related to extinguishment of the First Loan and Security
Agreements, the Second Loan and Security Agreements and the Web
Series Loan and Security Agreements during 2016.
Change in fair
value of warrant liability decreased by approximately $0.5 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2016 and increased by approximately $6.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2016 due to warrants that were issued in
the fourth quarter of 2016 that were accounted for as derivative
liabilities. We recorded the warrants at their fair value on the
date of issuance and will record any changes to fair value at each
balance sheet date on our consolidated statements of
operation.
Loss on
extinguishment of debt decreased by approximately $4.6 million and
$5.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 as
compared to the same period in prior year as a result of
extinguishment of certain debt of the Company. On March 29, 2016,
we entered into ten individual subscription agreements with each of
ten subscribers. The subscribers were holders of outstanding
promissory notes issued pursuant to loan and security agreements.
Pursuant to the terms of the subscription agreements, we agreed to
convert $2,883,377 aggregate amount of principal and interest
outstanding under the notes into an aggregate of 576,676 shares of
Common Stock at $5.00 per share as payment in full of each of the
notes. On the date of the conversion, our market price was $6.00
per share and we recorded a loss on the extinguishment of the debt
of $576,676 on our condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
49
In addition, on
March 4, 2016, we entered into a subscription agreement with DE
LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the subscription agreement, we agreed
to convert $3,073,410 of principal and interest outstanding on a
revolving promissory note into 614,682 shares of common stock at
$5.00 per share. On the date of conversion, our market price was
$6.00 per share and we recorded a loss on the extinguishment of the
debt of $614,682 on our condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
On May 31, 2016
and June 30, 2016, the Company entered into thirteen individual
debt exchange agreements with parties to loan and security
agreements under which it issued promissory notes to each of the
parties. Pursuant to the debt exchange agreements, the Company
agreed to convert an aggregate $17,551,480 in principal and accrued
interest under the promissory notes into an aggregate of 3,510,296
shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per share as payment in
full of each of the promissory notes. On May 31, 2016 and June 30,
2016, the market price per share of Common Stock was $6.99 and
$6.08, respectively. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on
the extinguishment of debt of $4,652,453 on its condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June
30, 2016.
We incurred
approximately $0.2 million and $0.7 million of legal, consulting
and auditing costs related to the acquisition of 42West during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
Net
Income (Loss)
Net loss was
approximately $1.5 million or $(0.08) per share based on 18,672,778
weighted average shares on both basic and fully diluted basis for
the three months ended June 30, 2017 and net income was
approximately $3.4 million or $0.21 per share based on 16,586,685
weighted average shares outstanding and $(0.15) per share on a
fully diluted basis based on 19,085,691 weighted average shares for
the six months ended June 30, 2017. Net loss for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $7.7 million or
$(1.76) per share based on 7,340,942 weighted average shares and
$11.2 million or $(2.72) based on 6,050,896 weighted average shares
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,
respectively. Net income and losses for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were related to the factors
discussed above.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
Flows
Cash flows provided
by operating activities increased by approximately $5.0 million
from approximately $(2.3) million used for operating activities
during the six months ended June 30, 2016 to approximately $2.7
million provided by operating activities during the six months
ended June 30, 2017. This increase was primarily due to (i) $2.1
million of production tax incentives received (ii) approximately $2
million received from accounts receivable related to Max Steel and (iii) cash flows provided
by 42West.
Cash flows from
investing activities increased by approximately $1.2 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period
in prior years primarily due to restricted cash that became
available and was used to pay a portion of our debt.
Cash flows used for
financing activities increased by approximately $8.4 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2017 from approximately $4.8 million
provided by financing activities during the six months ended June
30, 2016 to approximately $3.5 million used for financing
activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 mainly due to
(i) approximately $5.8 million used to repay the debt related to
the production, distribution and marketing loans for Max Steel, (ii) $0.7 million used to
pay the Put Rights exercised by the sellers of 42West and (iii)
$0.5 million repaid to our CEO for advances made to the Company for
working capital. In addition, we raised a net of $1.3 million more
through the sale of our common stock during the six months ended
June 30, 2016 than through various financing activities during the
six months ended June 30, 2017.
50
As of June 30, 2017
and 2016, we had cash available for working capital of
approximately $1.0 million and approximately $4.9 million,
respectively, and a working capital deficit of approximately $18.5
million and approximately $21.1 million, respectively.
As previously
discussed, in connection with the 42West Acquisition, we may be
required to purchase from the sellers up to an aggregate of
2,374,187 of their shares of Common Stock at a price equal to $4.61
per share during certain specified exercise periods up until
December 2020. Of that amount we may be required to purchase up to
455,531 shares in 2017, for an aggregate of up to $3.1 million. On
April 14, 2017 and June 1, 2017, the sellers of 42West, exercised
put options in the aggregate amount of 151,837 shares of Common
Stock and were paid an aggregate total of $0.7
million.
These factors,
along with an accumulated deficit of approximately $96.4 million,
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties. In this regard, management is planning to raise any
necessary additional funds through loans and additional issuances
of our Common Stock, securities convertible into our Common Stock,
debt securities or a combination of such financing alternatives.
There is no assurance that we will be successful in raising
additional capital. Such issuances of additional securities would
further dilute the equity interests of our existing shareholders,
perhaps substantially. We currently have the rights to several
scripts that we intend to obtain financing to produce during 2017
and 2018 and release during 2018. We will potentially earn a
producer and overhead fee for each of these productions. There can
be no assurances that such productions will be released or fees
will be realized in future periods. We expect to begin to generate
cash flows from our other sources of revenue, including the
distribution of at least one web series that, as discussed earlier
has gone into production. With the acquisition of 42West, we are
currently exploring opportunities to expand the services currently
being offered by 42West to the entertainment community. There can
be no assurance that we will be successful in selling these
services to clients.
In addition, we
have a substantial amount of debt. We do not currently have
sufficient assets to repay such debt in full when due, and our
available cash flow may not be adequate to maintain our current
operations if we are unable to repay, extend or refinance such
indebtedness. As of June 30, 2017, our total debt was approximately
$20.6 million and our total stockholders’ deficit was
approximately $2.9 million. Approximately $4.0 million
of the total debt as of June 30, 2017 represents the fair value of
put options in connection with the 42West acquisition, which may or
may not be exercised by the sellers. Although there is no recourse
to our company other than the copyright of our film, Max Steel,
with respect to approximately $12.9 million of our current
indebtedness ($9.7 outstanding under the prints and advertising
loan agreement plus $3.2 million outstanding under the production
service agreement), we will no longer receive any revenues from Max
Steel if we lose the copyright.
If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash to service our current or future
indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing or
delaying digital or film productions, selling assets, restructuring
or refinancing our indebtedness or seeking additional debt or
equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to
effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms or at all and
our indebtedness may affect our ability to continue to operate as a
going concern.
Financing
Arrangements
Prints and Advertising Loan
On August 12,
2016, Dolphin Max Steel Holding, LLC, (“Max Steel
Holdings”) a wholly owned subsidiary of Dolphin Films,
entered into a loan and security agreement (the “P&A
Loan”) providing for a $14.5 million non-revolving credit
facility that matures on August 25, 2017. The loan is not
secured by any other Dolphin entity and the only asset held by Max
Steel Holdings is the copyright for the motion picture. The
proceeds of the credit facility were used to pay a portion of the
print and advertising expenses of the domestic distribution of our
feature film, Max Steel. To secure Max Steel Holding’s
obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement, we granted to
the lender a security interest in bank account funds totaling
$1,250,000 pledged as collateral. During the six months ended June
30, 2017, we agreed to allow the lender to apply the $1,250,000 to
the loan balance. The loan is partially secured by a $4.5 million
corporate guaranty from a party associated with the motion picture,
of which Dolphin has agreed to backstop $620,000. The lender
has retained a reserve of $1.5 million for loan fees and interest
(the “Reserve”). Amounts borrowed under the
credit facility accrue interest at either (i) a fluctuating per
annum rate equal to the 5.5% plus a base rate or (ii) a per annum
rate equal to 6.5% plus the LIBOR determined for the applicable
interest period. As June 30, 2017, we had an outstanding balance of
$9,688,855, including the Reserve, related to this agreement
recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. On our
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2017, we recorded (i) interest expense of $425,472
related to the P&A Loan and (ii) $500,000 in direct costs from
loan proceeds that were not used by the distributor for the
marketing of the film and returned to the
lender.
51
Production Service Agreement
During 2014, we
entered into a financing deal in the amount of $10.4 million to
produce Max Steel. The loan is partially secured by international
distribution agreements made prior to the commencement of principal
photography and tax incentives. The agreement contains repayment
milestones to be made during the year ended December 31, 2015, that
if not met, accrue interest at a default rate of 8.5% per annum
above the published base rate of HSBC. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement and due to delays in the release of the film, we have
accrued $1.1million of interest. The film was released October 14,
2016 and delivery to the international distributors has begun.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and during the year ended
December 31, 2016, an aggregate of $3.0 million and $4.2 million
was received from the international distributors and tax incentives
from the jurisdiction in which a portion of the film was produced.
As of June 30, 2017, we had an outstanding balance of $3,203,689,
related to this debt on our condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
42West Line of Credit
In 2008, 42West
entered into a revolving line of credit with City National Bank,
(the “Line of Credit) which matures on August 31, 2017. We
are negotiating an extension of the line of credit and anticipate
being able to renew at substantially the same terms. The purpose of
the Line of Credit was to provide 42West with working capital as
needed from time to time. The maximum amount that can be drawn on
the Line of Credit is $1,500,000. The Line of Credit bears interest
computed as the greatest of (a) three and one half percent per year
or (b) the prime rate of City National Bank less one quarter of one
percent, provided that the rate per annum never exceeds 16%. On
April 27, 2017, we drew an additional $0.3 million from the Line of
Credit to be used for working capital. The balance as of June 30,
2017 was $0.7 million.
Promissory Notes
On April 10, 2017,
we signed two separate promissory notes, one in the amount of
$100,000 and the other in the amount of $200,000 that mature on
October 10, 2017. On April 18, 2017, we signed a promissory note in
the amount of $250,000 that matures on October 18, 2017. On June
14, 2017, we signed a promissory note in the amount of $400,000.
The note is for a two year term with no prepayment penalty after
the first six months. Each of the promissory notes bears interest
at a rate of 10% per annum, payable in 30-day installments after
the execution of the promissory notes. The proceeds of these
promissory notes were used for working capital.
Convertible Debt
On July 18, 2017,
we entered into a convertible promissory note agreement and
received $250,000. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and
matures on July 19, 2018. The holder of the convertible note has
the right to convert all or a portion of the Principal and any
accrued interest into shares of common stock of the Company at
price which is (i) the 90 trading-day average price per share as of
the date of the Notice of Conversion or (ii) if an Eligible
Offering, as defined in the agreement has occurred, 95% of the
public offering share price.
On July 26, 2017,
we entered into a subscription agreement to sell a convertible
promissory note in the amount of $250,000 to an unrelated party. On
August 1, 2017, we entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $25,000 to an
unrelated party. On August 4, 2017, the Company entered into a
subscription agreement to sell a convertible promissory note in the
amount of $50,000 to an unrelated party. Each of the convertible
promissory notes (the “Notes”) is for a period of one
year and bear interest at 10% per annum. The principal and any
accrued interest of the Notes is convertible by the holder at a
price of either (i) 90 day trailing trading price of the stock or
(ii) if an Eligible Offering of the Company’s stock (as
defined in the Notes) is made, 95% of the Public Offering Share
price as defined in the Note.
Critical
Accounting Policies
See “Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented
herein and our current annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2016 for discussion of significant accounting
policies, recent accounting pronouncements and their effect, if
any, on the Company. These policies, along with the following new
policies adopted during the six months ended June 30, 2017, have
been followed for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
52
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
The
Company’s trade accounts receivable are recorded at amounts
billed to customers, and presented on the balance sheet net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is determined by
various factors, including the age of the receivables, current
economic conditions, historical losses and other information
management obtains regarding the financial condition of customers.
The policy for determining the past due status of receivables is
based on how recently payments have been received. Receivables are
charged off when they are deemed uncollectible.
Revenue Recognition
Publicity revenue
consists of fees from the performance of professional services and
billings for direct costs reimbursed by clients. Fees are generally
recognized on a straight-line or monthly basis which approximates
the proportional performance
Investment
Investment
represents an investment in equity securities of The Virtual
Reality Company (“VRC”). The Company’s $220,000
investment in VRC represents less than 1% noncontrolling ownership
interest in VRC. Accordingly, the Company accounts for its
investment under the cost method. Under the cost method, the
investor’s share of earnings or losses is not included in the
balance sheet or statement of operations. The net accumulated
earnings of the investee subsequent to the date of investment are
recognized by the investor only to the extent distributed by the
investee as dividends. However, impairment charges are recognized
in the statement of operations, if factors come to our attention
that indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has
occurred that is other than temporary.
Deferred Landlord Reimbursement
Deferred landlord
reimbursement represents the landlord’s reimbursement for
tenant improvements of one of the Company’s office spaces.
Such amount is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of
the lease.
Intangible assets
In
connection with the acquisition of 42West that occurred on March
30, 2017, the Company acquired an estimated $9,110,000 of
intangible assets with finite useful lives initially estimated to
range from 3 to 10 years. As indicated in note 4, the purchase
price allocation and related consideration are provisional and
subject to completion and adjustment. Intangible assets are
initially recorded at fair value and are amortized over their
respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
Goodwill
In
connection with the acquisition of 42West that occurred on March
30, 2017 (note 4), the Company recorded $13,996,337 of goodwill,
which management has assigned to the Entertainment Publicity
reporting unit. As indicated in note 4, the purchase price
allocation and related consideration are provisional and subject to
completion and adjustment. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017,
the Company adjusted goodwill in the amount of $340,582 to record
the issuance of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
related to a working capital adjustment, as provided for in the
purchase agreement and adjust the fair value of certain liabilities
as of the acquisition date. The Company accounts for goodwill in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 350,
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other ("ASC 350"). ASC 350 requires
goodwill to be reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently
if circumstances indicate a possible impairment. The Company
evaluates goodwill in the fourth quarter or more frequently if
management believes indicators of impairment exist. Such indicators
could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse
change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated
competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a
regulator.
The
Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it
is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit
is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. If management
concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of
the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, management
conducts a two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The
first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair value
of the reporting unit with its carrying value (including goodwill).
The Company estimates the fair values of its reporting units using
a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows approach and
the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies’
data. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying
value, step two does not need to be performed. If the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value,
an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit,
and the Company must perform step two of the impairment test
(measurement).
Under
step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the
carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the
implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the
reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation
in acquisition accounting. The residual fair value after this
allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit
goodwill. To the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill
exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss would be
recorded
53
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note
1, Basis of
Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this
report.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30,
2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements
in this Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking”
statements for purposes of federal and state securities
laws. These statements concern expectations, beliefs,
projections, plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and
similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical
facts. Such forward-looking statements include:
●
our expectations
regarding the potential benefits and synergies we can derive from
the 42West Acquisition;
●
our ability to
generate new revenue streams through our new subsidiary,
42West;
●
our expectations
concerning our ability to derive future cash flows and revenues
from the production, release and advertising of future web series
on online platforms, and the timing of receipt of such cash flows
and revenues;
●
our expectations
concerning the timing of production and distribution of a digital
project showcasing favorite restaurants of NFL players, as well as
future feature films and digital projects;
●
our intention to
source potential secondary distribution partners for our web
series, South Beach –
Fever, and to enter into distribution agreements for future
digital productions;
●
our expectation
that we will receive revenues from our motion picture, Max Steel from (i) international
revenues expected to be derived through license agreements with
international distributors and (ii) other secondary distribution
revenues;
●
our intention to
use our purchased scripts for future motion picture and digital
productions;
●
our expectations to
raise funds through sales of our Common Stock;
●
our intention to
borrow funds from our CEO, private investors and other lenders to
produce our digital and motion picture projects;
●
our beliefs
regarding the merits of claims asserted in the class action against
42West and other defendants and our defenses against such
claims;
●
our intention to
implement improvements to address material weaknesses in internal
control over financial reporting; and
●
our expectations
concerning the impact of recent Accounting Standards Updates on our
financial position or results of operations.
These
forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future
events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. We
wish to caution readers that certain important factors may have
affected and could in the future affect our actual results and
could cause actual results to differ significantly from those
expressed in any forward-looking statement. The most important
factors that could prevent us from achieving our goals, and cause
the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements and the
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or
implied by those forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, the following:
●
our inability to
realize the anticipated benefits of the 42West Acquisition,
including synergies, expanded service offerings and increased
revenues;
54
●
adverse trends and
changes in the entertainment industry that could negatively impact
42West’s operations and ability to generate
revenues;
●
unpredictability of
the commercial success of our current and future web series and
motion pictures;
●
economic factors
that adversely impact the entertainment industry, as well as
advertising, production and distribution revenue in the online and
motion picture industries;
●
our ability to
identify, produce and develop online digital entertainment and
motion pictures that meet industry and customer
demand;
●
competition for
talent and other resources within the industry and our ability to
enter into agreements with talent under favorable
terms;
●
our ability to
attract and retain the highly specialized services of the 42West
executives and employees;
●
availability of
financing from our CEO and other investors under favorable terms to
fund our digital and motion picture projects;
●
our ability to
adequately address material weaknesses in internal control over
financial reporting;
●
uncertainties
regarding the outcome of pending litigation; and
●
our ability to
accurately predict the impact of recent Accounting Standards
Updates on our financial position or results of
operations.
Any forward-looking
statements, which we make in this Form 10-Q, speak only as of the
date of such statement, and we undertake no obligation to update
such statements. Comparisons of results for current and any prior
periods are not intended to express any future trends or
indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and
should only be viewed as historical data. The safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 do not apply to our forward-looking statements as a result
of being a penny stock issuer.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
Management’s
Report on the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Disclosure controls
and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
We carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2017. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective due to material weaknesses disclosed in our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April
17, 2017, which have not been fully remediated as of the date of
the filing of this report.
55
Remediation
of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
In order to
remediate the other material weaknesses in internal control over
financial reporting, we are in the process of finalizing a
remediation plan, under the direction of our Board of Directors,
and intend to implement improvements during fiscal year 2017 as
follows:
●
|
Our Board of
Directors will review the COSO “Internal Control over
Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies”
that was published in 2006 including the control environment, risk
assessment, control activities, information and communication and
monitoring. Based on this framework, the Board of Directors will
implement controls as needed assuming a cost benefit relationship.
In addition, our Board of Directors will also evaluate the key
concepts of the updated 2013 COSO “Internal Control –
Integrated Framework” as it provides a means to apply
internal control to any type of entity
|
|
|
●
|
Document all
significant accounting policies and ensure that the accounting
policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. and that internal controls are designed
effectively to ensure that the financial information is properly
reported. Management will engage independent accounting
specialists, if necessary, to ensure that there is an independent
verification of the accounting positions taken.
|
|
|
●
|
We will implement a
higher standard for document retention and support for all items
related to revenue recognition. All revenue arrangements that are
entered into by us will be evaluated under the applicable revenue
guidance and management should document their position based on the
facts and circumstances of each agreement.
|
●
|
In connection with
the reported inadequately documented review and approval of certain
aspects of the accounting process, management has plans to assess
the current review and approval processes and implement changes to
ensure that all material agreements, accounting reconciliations and
journal entries are reviewed and approved on a timely basis and
that this review process is documented by a member of management
separate from the preparer. A documented quarter end close
procedure will be established whereby management will review and
approve reconciliations and journal entries. Management will
formally approve new vendors that are added to the master vendor
file.
|
●
|
In connection with
the reported inadequate segregation of duties, management intends
to hire additional personnel in the Accounting and Finance area.
This will allow for adequate segregation of duties in performing
the accounting processes.
|
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During our last
fiscal quarter there were no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably
likely to materially affect such internal controls over financial
reporting.
56
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
A putative class
action was filed on May 5, 2017, in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida by Kenneth and Emily
Reel on behalf of a purported nationwide class of individuals who
attended the Fyre Music Festival, or the Fyre Festival, in the
Bahamas on April 28-30, 2017. The complaint names several
defendants, including 42West, along with the organizers of the Fyre
Festival, Fyre Media Inc. and Fyre Festival LLC, individuals
related to Fyre, and another entity called Matte Projects LLC. The
complaint alleges that the Fyre Festival was promoted by Fyre as a
luxurious experience through an extensive marketing campaign
orchestrated by Fyre and executed with the assistance of outside
marketing companies, 42West and Matte, but that the reality of the
festival did not live up to the luxury experience that it was
represented to be. The plaintiffs assert claims for fraud,
negligent misrepresentation and for violation of several
states’ consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs seek to
certify a nationwide class action comprised of “All persons
or entities that purchased a Fyre Festival 2017 ticket or package
or that attended, or planned to attend, Fyre Festival 2017”
and seek damages in excess of $5,000,000 on behalf of themselves
and the class. The plaintiffs sought to consolidate this
action with five other class actions also arising out of the Fyre
Festival (to which 42West is not a party) in a Multi District
Litigation proceeding, which request was denied by the panel. We
believe the claims against 42West are without merit and that we
have strong defenses to the claims.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
A
description of the risk factors associated with our business is
contained in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on April
17, 2017 (the “Form 10-K”) and below:
We currently have substantial indebtedness which may adversely
affect our cash flow and business operations and may affect our
ability to continue to operate as a going concern.
We
currently have a substantial amount of debt. We do not
currently have sufficient assets to repay such debt in full when
due, and our available cash flow may not be adequate to maintain
our current operations if we are unable to repay, extend or
refinance such indebtedness. The table below sets forth our
total principal amount of debt and stockholders’ equity as of
December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2017. Approximately $4 million
of the total debt as of June 30, 2017 represents the fair value of
the put options in connection with the 42West acquisition, which
may or may not be exercised by the sellers. Although there is no
recourse to our company other than the copyright of our film,
Max Steel, with respect to
approximately $12.9 million of our current indebtedness ($9.7
outstanding under the prints and advertising loan agreement plus
$3.2 million outstanding under the production service agreement),
we will no longer receive any revenues from Max Steel if we lose the
copyright.
|
As
of
|
As
of
|
|
December
31,
2016
|
June 30
31,
2017
|
Related party
debt
|
$(684,326)
|
$(1,818,659)
|
Total Debt
(including related party debt)
|
$(19,727,395)
|
$(20,611,203)
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
$(31,867,797)
|
$(3,024,560)
|
Our
indebtedness could have important negative consequences,
including:
57
●
our
ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital
expenditures, future productions or other purposes may be impaired
or such financing may not be available on favorable terms or at
all;
●
we may
have to pay higher interest rates upon obtaining future financing,
thereby reducing our cash flows; and
●
we may
need a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make
principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, reducing the
funds that would otherwise be available for operations and future
business opportunities.
Our
ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon, among other
things, our future financial and operating performance and our
ability to obtain additional financing, which will be affected by
prevailing economic conditions, the profitability of our
entertainment production and entertainment marketing and public
relations businesses and other factors contained in the
Risk Factors included in
the Form 10-K, some of which are beyond our control.
If we
are not able to generate sufficient cash to service our current or
future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as
reducing or delaying digital or film productions, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness or seeking additional
debt or equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able
to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms or at all and
our indebtedness may affect our ability to continue to operate as a
going concern.
Litigation or legal proceedings could expose us to significant
liabilities and jeopardize our ability to continue as a going
concern.
We are,
and in the future may become, party to litigation claims and legal
proceedings. For example, 42West was named as one of the
defendants in a putative class action alleging fraudulent
misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, fraud in the
inducement, breach of contract, and violation of various state
consumer protection laws. The putative class action, which
was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Florida on May 5, 2017, alleged that 42West and the other
defendants made false and misleading representations in promoting
the “Fyre Festival”, which did not live up to the
luxury experience that it was represented to be. The plaintiffs
seek to certify a nationwide class action and seek damages in
excess of $5,000,000 on behalf of themselves and the class.
If the defendants are found liable for the alleged violations,
42West could be required to pay substantial amounts towards such
damages. In addition, a class action lawsuit would require
significant management time and attention and would result in
significant legal expenses. Although we have insurance in
case such claims arise, it may not apply to or fully cover any
liabilities we may incur as a result of such claims. While we
believe the claims against 42West are without merit, regardless of
the merit or ultimate results of any litigation, such claims could
divert management’s attention and resources from our
business, and would result in substantial costs, which could harm
our financial condition and results of operations and jeopardize
our ability to continue as a going concern.
58
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS.
Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities
On April 13, 2017,
the Company issued 6,508 shares of Common Stock to a consultant for
services rendered during the month ended March 31, 2017. The shares
were issued at a purchase price of $4.61 per share.
On April 13, 2017,
T Squared partially exercised Class E Warrants and acquired 325,770
shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the cashless exercise
provision in the related warrant agreement. T Squared had
previously paid down $1,675,000 for these shares.
On July 18, 2017,
the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement
with an unrelated third party and received $250,000. The note bears
interest at 10% per annum and matures on July 19, 2018. The holder
of the convertible note has the right to convert all or a portion
of the Principal and any accrued interest into shares of Common
Stock of the Company at price which is (i) the 90 trading-day
average price per share as of the date of the Notice of Conversion
or (ii) if an Eligible Offering, as defined in the agreement has
occurred, 95% of the public offering share price.
On July 26, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $250,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note is for a period of
one year and bears interest at 10% per annum. The principal and any
accrued interest of the promissory note are convertible by the
holder at a price of either (i) 90 day trailing trading price of
the stock or (ii) if an Eligible Offering of the Common Stock (as
defined in the promissory note) is made, 95% of the Public Offering
Share price as defined in the promissory note.
On August 1, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $25,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note is for a period of
one year and bears interest at 10% per annum. The principal and any
accrued interest of the promissory note are convertible by the
holder at a price of either (i) 90 day trailing trading price of
the stock or (ii) if an Eligible Offering of the Common Stock (as
defined in the promissory note) is made, 95% of the Public Offering
Share price as defined in the promissory note.
On August 2, 2017,
the Company issued 5,771 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.00
per share to a third party in settlement of an outstanding account
receivable.
On August 4, 2017,
the Company entered into a subscription agreement to sell a
convertible promissory note in the amount of $50,000 to an
unrelated party. The convertible promissory note is for a period of
one year and bears interest at 10% per annum. The principal and any
accrued interest of the promissory note are convertible by the
holder at a price of either (i) 90 day trailing trading price of
the stock or (ii) if an Eligible Offering of the Common Stock (as
defined in the promissory note) is made, 95% of the Public Offering
Share price as defined in the promissory note.
All of the
foregoing issuances were made in private placements in reliance
upon the exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the
Securities Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated
thereunder, except that the April 13, 2017 issuance was made in
reliance upon the exemption from registration under Section 3(a)(9)
of the Securities Act.
59
Company Purchases of Equity
Securities
The
following table presents information related to our repurchases of
our shares of Common Stock during the second quarter of
2017:
Repurchase of
Securities
Period
|
Total Number of Shares
Purchased(1)
|
Average Price Paid
Per
Share |
Total Number of SharesPurchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/1/2017
- 4/30/2017
|
86,764
|
$4.61
|
—
|
—
|
5/1/2017
- 5/31/2017
|
—
|
$—
|
—
|
—
|
6/1/2017
- 6/30/2017
|
65,073
|
$4.61
|
—
|
—
|
Total
|
151,837
|
$4.61
|
—
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
|
Pursuant
to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Put
Agreements, the Sellers exercised their Put Rights and caused the
Company to purchase 151,837 shares of Common Stock for an aggregate
amount of $700,000. See Note 4 — Acquisition of 42West for
further discussion of the Put Agreements.
|
60
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Dolphin Digital Media, Inc.
(conformed copy incorporating all amendments through July 6,
2017).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extensions Schema |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy
Extension Label Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
|
61
SIGNATURES
In accordance with
the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized August 21, 2017.
|
Dolphin
Entertainment Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
O’Dowd IV
|
|
|
|
Name:
William O’Dowd IV
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
Dolphin
Entertainment Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Mirta A
Negrini
|
|
|
|
Name:
Mirta A Negrini
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
62