Drive Shack Inc. - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
or
o TRANSITION
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the
transition period from to
Commission
File Number: 001-31458
Newcastle
Investment Corp.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
|
81-0559116
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or
organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
No.)
|
1345
Avenue of the Americas, New York,
NY
|
10105
|
(Address
of principal executive
offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(212)
798-6100
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
___________________________________________
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer x Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the last practicable date.
Common
stock, $0.01 par value per share: 52,769,699 shares outstanding as of May 4,
2007.
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP.
FORM
10-Q
INDEX
PAGE
|
||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31,
2006
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income (unaudited) for the three months ended March
31, 2007
and 2006
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity (unaudited) for the three months
ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended
March 31,
2007 and 2006
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
31
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
36
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
37
|
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
37
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
38
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
38
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
38
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
38
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
39
|
SIGNATURES
|
40
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars
in thousands, except share data)
March
31, 2007 (Unaudited)
|
December
31, 2006
|
||||||
Assets
|
|
|
|||||
Real
estate securities, available for sale
|
$
|
5,581,179
|
$
|
5,581,228
|
|||
Real
estate related loans, net
|
2,138,974
|
1,568,916
|
|||||
Residential
mortgage loans, net
|
752,590
|
809,097
|
|||||
Subprime
mortgage loans, held for sale
|
1,018,080
|
-
|
|||||
Subprime
mortgage loans subject to call option - Note 5
|
289,021
|
288,202
|
|||||
Investments
in unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
22,778
|
22,868
|
|||||
Operating
real estate, net
|
29,684
|
29,626
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
3,929
|
5,371
|
|||||
Restricted
cash
|
267,903
|
184,169
|
|||||
Derivative
assets
|
51,032
|
62,884
|
|||||
Receivables
and other assets
|
65,801
|
52,031
|
|||||
|
$
|
10,220,971
|
$
|
8,604,392
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
|||||||
Liabilities
|
|||||||
CBO
bonds payable
|
$
|
4,282,503
|
$
|
4,313,824
|
|||
Other
bonds payable
|
649,853
|
675,844
|
|||||
Notes
payable
|
109,922
|
128,866
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
2,198,064
|
760,346
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements subject to ABCP facility
|
1,312,209
|
1,143,749
|
|||||
Financing
of subprime mortgage loans subject to call option - Note 5
|
289,021
|
288,202
|
|||||
Credit
facility
|
125,500
|
93,800
|
|||||
Junior
subordinated notes payable (security for trust preferred)
|
100,100
|
100,100
|
|||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
22,726
|
17,715
|
|||||
Dividends
payable
|
35,003
|
33,095
|
|||||
Due
to affiliates
|
5,035
|
13,465
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
52,085
|
33,406
|
|||||
|
9,182,021
|
7,602,412
|
|||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 2,500,000
|
|||||||
shares
of 9.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 1,600,000
|
|||||||
shares
of 8.05% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and 2,000,000
|
|||||||
shares
of 8.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, liquidation
|
|||||||
preference
$25.00 per share, issued and outstanding
|
152,500
|
102,500
|
|||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 48,209,699
and
|
|||||||
45,713,817
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and
|
|||||||
December
31, 2006, respectively
|
482
|
457
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
908,368
|
833,887
|
|||||
Dividends
in excess of earnings
|
(10,437
|
)
|
(10,848
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(11,963
|
)
|
75,984
|
||||
|
1,038,950
|
1,001,980
|
|||||
|
$
|
10,220,971
|
$
|
8,604,392
|
|||
|
1
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(dollars
in thousands, except share data)
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Revenues
|
|
|
|||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
162,221
|
$
|
113,907
|
|||
Rental
and
escalation income
|
1,253
|
2,008
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of
investments, net
|
2,212
|
1,928
|
|||||
Other
income,
net
|
743
|
5,705
|
|||||
|
166,429
|
123,548
|
|||||
Expenses
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
116,757
|
76,965
|
|||||
Property
operating
expense
|
1,036
|
818
|
|||||
Loan
and security
servicing expense
|
1,983
|
2,006
|
|||||
Provision
for
credit losses
|
2,036
|
2,007
|
|||||
Provision
for
losses, loans held for sale - Note 5
|
-
|
4,127
|
|||||
General
and
administrative expense
|
1,337
|
1,630
|
|||||
Management
fee to
affiliate
|
3,906
|
3,471
|
|||||
Incentive
compensation to affiliate
|
3,688
|
2,852
|
|||||
Depreciation
and
amortization
|
329
|
199
|
|||||
|
131,072
|
94,075
|
|||||
Income
before equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
35,357
|
29,473
|
|||||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
847
|
1,195
|
|||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
36,204
|
30,668
|
|||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
(13
|
)
|
251
|
||||
Net
Income
|
36,191
|
30,919
|
|||||
Preferred
dividends
|
(2,515
|
)
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|||
Income
Available For Common Stockholders
|
$
|
33,676
|
$
|
28,591
|
|||
Net
Income Per Share of Common Stock
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.71
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.70
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||
Income
from continuing operations per share of common stock,
|
|||||||
after preferred dividends
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.71
|
$
|
0.64
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.70
|
$
|
0.64
|
|||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations per share of common
stock
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
||
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
||
Weighted
Average Number of Shares of Common Stock
Outstanding
|
|||||||
Basic
|
47,572,895
|
43,944,820
|
|||||
Diluted
|
47,823,497
|
44,063,940
|
|||||
Dividends
Declared per Share of Common Stock
|
$
|
0.690
|
$
|
0.625
|
|||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
2
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
FOR
THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Dividends
in Excess of
Earnings
|
|
Accum.
Other Comp. Income
(Loss)
|
Total
Stock-holders'
Equity
|
||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity - December 31, 2006
|
4,100,000
|
$
|
102,500
|
45,713,817
|
$
|
457
|
$
|
833,887
|
$
|
(10,848
|
)
|
$
|
75,984
|
$
|
1,001,980
|
||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(35,780
|
)
|
-
|
(35,780
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
-
|
-
|
2,420,000
|
24
|
74,958
|
-
|
-
|
74,982
|
|||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of common stock options
|
-
|
-
|
75,882
|
1
|
1,270
|
-
|
-
|
1,271
|
|||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of preferred stock
|
2,000,000
|
50,000
|
-
|
-
|
(1,747
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
48,253
|
||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
36,191
|
-
|
36,191
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized
(loss) on securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(65,513
|
)
|
(65,513
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of
net realized (gain) loss
on securities
into earnings
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(7,759
|
)
|
(7,759
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency
translation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
189
|
189
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized
(loss) on derivatives designated
as cash
flow hedges
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(15,195
|
)
|
(15,195
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of
net realized loss
on derivatives
designated as
cash
flow
hedges
into earnings
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
331
|
331 | |||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive
income (loss)
|
(51,756
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity - March 31, 2007
|
6,100,000
|
$
|
152,500
|
48,209,699
|
$
|
482
|
$
|
908,368
|
$
|
(10,437
|
)
|
$
|
(11,963
|
)
|
$
|
1,038,950
|
|||||||||
Stockholders'
equity - December 31, 2005
|
4,100,000
|
$
|
102,500
|
43,913,409
|
$
|
439
|
$
|
782,735
|
$
|
(13,235
|
)
|
$
|
45,564
|
$
|
918,003
|
||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(29,808
|
)
|
-
|
(29,808
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Exercise
of common stock options
|
-
|
-
|
54,000
|
1
|
1,049
|
-
|
-
|
1,050
|
|||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
30,919
|
-
|
30,919
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized
(loss) on securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(36,554
|
)
|
(36,554
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of
net realized (gain) on
securities
into
earnings
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(29
|
)
|
(29
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency
translation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(34
|
)
|
(34
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gain
on derivatives designated as
cash
flow hedges
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
56,145
|
56,145
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of
net realized (gain) on
derivatives
designated as cash flow
hedges into earnings
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(415
|
)
|
(415
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive
income
|
50,032
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity - March 31, 2006
|
4,100,000
|
$
|
102,500
|
43,967,409
|
$
|
440
|
$
|
783,784
|
$
|
(12,124
|
)
|
$
|
64,677
|
$
|
939,277
|
||||||||||
|
3
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (Unaudited)
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
36,191
|
$
|
30,919
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
|||||||
(inclusive
of amounts related to discontinued operations):
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
329
|
199
|
|||||
Accretion
of discount and other amortization
|
(3,429
|
)
|
(9,732
|
)
|
|||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
(847
|
)
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|||
Distributions
of
earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
847
|
1,195
|
|||||
Deferred rent
|
73
|
(837
|
)
|
||||
Gain on sale of investments
|
(2,212
|
)
|
(2,291
|
)
|
|||
Unrealized gain on non-hedge derivatives and hedge
ineffectiveness
|
(471
|
)
|
(5,673
|
)
|
|||
Provision for credit losses
|
2,036
|
2,007
|
|||||
Provision for losses, loans held for sale
|
-
|
4,127
|
|||||
Purchase
of loans held for sale - Notes 4 and 5
|
(992,031
|
)
|
(1,511,086
|
)
|
|||
Change
in:
|
|||||||
Restricted
cash
|
(22,645
|
)
|
8,570
|
||||
Receivables
and other assets
|
(17,233
|
)
|
5,929
|
||||
Due
to affiliates
|
(8,430
|
)
|
(4,772
|
)
|
|||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
5,631
|
12,239
|
|||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,002,191
|
)
|
(1,470,401
|
)
|
|||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
|
|||||||
Purchase
of real estate securities
|
(225,808
|
)
|
(168,480
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of real estate securities
|
51,673
|
54,225
|
|||||
Purchase of and advances on loans
|
(574,698
|
)
|
(221,173
|
)
|
|||
Repayments
of loan and security principal
|
124,559
|
187,188
|
|||||
Margin
received on derivative instruments
|
20,946
|
-
|
|||||
Return
of margin on derivative instruments
|
(26,691
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Margin
deposits on total rate of return swaps (treated as derivative
instruments)
|
(48,636
|
)
|
(15,517
|
)
|
|||
Return
of margin deposits on total rate of return swaps (treated as derivative
instruments)
|
29,316
|
19,866
|
|||||
Proceeds
from termination of derivative instruments
|
208
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of derivative instrument into Securitization Trust -
Note
5
|
-
|
7,356
|
|||||
Purchase
and improvement of operating real estate
|
(144
|
)
|
(179
|
)
|
|||
Contributions
to unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
-
|
(100
|
)
|
||||
Distributions
of capital from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
90
|
1,107
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(649,185
|
)
|
(135,707
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Continued
on Page 5
|
4
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (Unaudited)
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|||||
Repayments of CBO bonds payable
|
(32,210
|
)
|
(10,129
|
)
|
|||
Issuance
of other
bonds payable
|
-
|
237,111
|
|||||
Repayments
of
other bonds payable
|
(26,407
|
)
|
(236,372
|
)
|
|||
Repayments
of
notes payable
|
(18,944
|
)
|
(39,616
|
)
|
|||
Borrowings
under repurchase agreements
|
1,776,665
|
1,817,109
|
|||||
Repayments
of
repurchase agreements
|
(338,947
|
)
|
(191,185
|
)
|
|||
Issuance
of
repurchase agreement subject to ABCP facility
|
216,672
|
-
|
|||||
Repayments
of
repurchase agreement subject to ABCP facility
|
(48,212
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Draws
under
credit facility
|
308,800
|
90,000
|
|||||
Repayments
of
credit facility
|
(277,100
|
)
|
(110,000
|
)
|
|||
Issuance
of
junior subordinated notes payable
|
-
|
100,100
|
|||||
Issuance
of
common stock
|
75,746
|
-
|
|||||
Costs
related
to issuance of common stock
|
(732
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Exercise
of
common stock options
|
1,271
|
1,050
|
|||||
Issuance
of
preferred stock
|
50,000
|
-
|
|||||
Costs
related
to issuance of preferred stock
|
(1,747
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Dividends
paid
|
(33,872
|
)
|
(29,828
|
)
|
|||
Payment
of
deferred financing costs
|
(1,049
|
)
|
(4,932
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
1,649,934
|
1,623,308
|
|||||
Net
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(1,442
|
)
|
17,200
|
||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
|
5,371
|
21,275
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
|
$
|
3,929
|
$
|
38,475
|
|||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during
the period for interest expense
|
$
|
101,458
|
$
|
67,648
|
|||
Cash
paid
during the period for income taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
244
|
|||
Supplemental
Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing
Activities
|
|||||||
Common
stock dividends declared but not paid
|
$
|
33,265
|
$
|
27,480
|
|||
Preferred
stock
dividends declared but not paid
|
$
|
1,552
|
$
|
1,552
|
|||
Foreclosure
of
loans
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
12,200
|
5
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
1.
GENERAL
Newcastle
Investment Corp. (and its subsidiaries, "Newcastle") is a Maryland corporation
that was formed in 2002. Newcastle conducts its business through three primary
segments: (i) real estate securities and real estate related loans, (ii)
residential mortgage loans, and (iii) operating real estate.
Newcastle
is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a real estate investment
trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, Newcastle will
generally not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on that portion
of
its net income that is distributed to stockholders if it distributes at least
90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders by prescribed dates and
complies with various other requirements.
Newcastle
is party to a management agreement (the "Management Agreement") with FIG LLC
(the "Manager"), an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC, under which
the
Manager advises Newcastle on various aspects of its business and manages its
day-to-day operations, subject to the supervision of Newcastle's board of
directors. For its services, the Manager receives an annual management fee
and
incentive compensation, both as defined in the Management Agreement.
Approximately
2.9 million shares of Newcastle’s common stock were held by the Manager, through
its affiliates, and its principals at March 31, 2007. In addition, the Manager,
through its affiliates, held options to purchase approximately 1.2 million
shares of Newcastle’s common stock at March 31, 2007.
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes of Newcastle
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States for interim financial reporting and the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information
and
footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted.
In
the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation of Newcastle's financial position, results of operations and cash
flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The operating
results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire
year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Newcastle's
consolidated financial statements for
the
year ended December 31, 2006
and
notes thereto included in Newcastle’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Capitalized terms used herein, and not
otherwise defined, are defined in Newcastle’s consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
6
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
2.
INFORMATION REGARDING BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Newcastle
conducts its business through three primary segments: real estate securities
and
real estate related loans, residential mortgage loans, and operating real
estate.
Summary
financial data on Newcastle's segments is given below, together with a
reconciliation to the same data for Newcastle as a whole:
Real
Estate Securities
and
Real Estate Related Loans
|
Residential
Mortgage
Loans
|
Operating
Real
Estate
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
March
31, 2007 and the Three Months then Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross
revenues
|
$
|
135,419
|
$
|
29,646
|
$
|
1,284
|
$
|
80
|
$
|
166,429
|
||||||
Operating
expenses
|
(613
|
)
|
(3,436
|
)
|
(1,080
|
)
|
(8,857
|
)
|
(13,986
|
)
|
||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
134,806
|
26,210
|
204
|
(8,777
|
)
|
152,443
|
||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(93,342
|
)
|
(19,738
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
(3,671
|
)
|
(116,757
|
)
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
-
|
-
|
(256
|
)
|
(73
|
)
|
(329
|
)
|
||||||||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
270
|
-
|
576
|
1
|
847
|
|||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
41,734
|
6,472
|
518
|
(12,520
|
)
|
36,204
|
||||||||||
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
-
|
-
|
(13
|
)
|
-
|
(13
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
41,734
|
6,472
|
505
|
(12,520
|
)
|
36,191
|
||||||||||
Preferred
dividends
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,515
|
)
|
(2,515
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) available for common stockholders
|
$
|
41,734
|
$
|
6,472
|
$
|
505
|
$
|
(15,035
|
)
|
$
|
33,676
|
|||||
Revenue
derived from non-U.S. sources:
|
||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
730
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
730
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
8,031,677
|
$
|
2,132,769
|
$
|
48,731
|
$
|
7,794
|
$
|
10,220,971
|
||||||
Long-lived
assets outside the U.S.:
|
||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,661
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,661
|
||||||
December
31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
7,366,684
|
$
|
1,179,547
|
$
|
48,518
|
$
|
9,643
|
$
|
8,604,392
|
||||||
Long-lived
assets outside the U.S.:
|
||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,553
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,553
|
||||||
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
revenues
|
$
|
95,193
|
$
|
26,029
|
$
|
2,184
|
$
|
142
|
$
|
123,548
|
||||||
Operating
expenses
|
(817
|
)
|
(7,463
|
)
|
(877
|
)
|
(7,754
|
)
|
(16,911
|
)
|
||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
94,376
|
18,566
|
1,307
|
(7,612
|
)
|
106,637
|
||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(62,198
|
)
|
(13,928
|
)
|
-
|
(839
|
)
|
(76,965
|
)
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
-
|
-
|
(131
|
)
|
(68
|
)
|
(199
|
)
|
||||||||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
701
|
-
|
494
|
-
|
1,195
|
|||||||||||
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
32,879
|
4,638
|
1,670
|
(8,519
|
)
|
30,668
|
||||||||||
Income
from discontinued operations
|
-
|
-
|
251
|
-
|
251
|
|||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
32,879
|
4,638
|
1,921
|
(8,519
|
)
|
30,919
|
||||||||||
Preferred
dividends
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,328
|
)
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) available for common stockholders
|
$
|
32,879
|
$
|
4,638
|
$
|
1,921
|
$
|
(10,847
|
)
|
$
|
28,591
|
|||||
Revenue
derived from non-U.S. sources:
|
||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
2,380
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
2,380
|
||||||
continued
on page 8
|
7
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
Unconsolidated
Subsidiaries
The
following table summarizes the activity for significant subsidiaries affecting
the equity held by Newcastle in unconsolidated subsidiaries:
Operating
Real
Estate
|
Real
Estate Loan
|
||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
$
|
12,528
|
$
|
10,249
|
|||
Contributions
to unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Distributions
from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
(371
|
)
|
(706
|
)
|
|||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
576
|
409
|
|||||
Balance
at March 31, 2007
|
$
|
12,733
|
$
|
9,952
|
|||
Summarized
financial information related to Newcastle’s significant unconsolidated
subsidiaries was as follows:
Operating
Real Estate (A) (B)
|
Real
Estate Loan (A) (C)
|
||||||||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Assets
|
$
|
78,568
|
$
|
78,381
|
$
|
20,018
|
$
|
20,615
|
|||||
Liabilities
|
(52,625
|
)
|
(52,856
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Minority
interest
|
(477
|
)
|
(470
|
)
|
(113
|
)
|
(116
|
)
|
|||||
Equity
|
$
|
25,466
|
$
|
25,055
|
$
|
19,905
|
$
|
20,499
|
|||||
Equity
held by Newcastle
|
$
|
12,733
|
$
|
12,528
|
$
|
9,952
|
$
|
10,249
|
|||||
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
2,018
|
$
|
1,835
|
$
|
828
|
$
|
1,417
|
|||||
Expenses
|
(844
|
)
|
(828
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
(8
|
)
|
|||||
Minority
interest
|
(22
|
)
|
(19
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
(8
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,152
|
$
|
988
|
$
|
818
|
$
|
1,401
|
|||||
Newcastle's
equity in net income
|
$
|
576
|
$
|
494
|
$
|
409
|
$
|
701
|
|||||
(A) |
The
unconsolidated subsidiaries’ summary financial information is presented on
a fair value basis, consistent with their internal basis of
accounting.
|
(B) |
Included
in the operating real estate segment.
|
(C) |
Included
in the real estate securities and real estate related loans
segment.
|
8
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
3.
REAL ESTATE SECURITIES
The
following is a summary of Newcastle’s real estate securities at March 31, 2007,
all of which are classified as available for sale and are therefore marked
to
market through other comprehensive income.
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current
Face Amount
|
Amortized
Cost
Basis
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Carrying
Value
|
Number
of
Securities
|
S&P
Equivalent
Rating
|
Coupon
|
Yield
|
Maturity
(Years)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS-Conduit
|
$
|
1,477,085
|
$
|
1,433,659
|
$
|
25,025
|
$
|
(16,348
|
)
|
$
|
1,442,336
|
201
|
BBB
|
5.83%
|
|
6.52%
|
|
6.72
|
|||||||||||||
CMBS-Large
Loan
|
681,548
|
682,070
|
2,833
|
(976
|
)
|
683,927
|
50
|
BBB-
|
6.82%
|
|
6.85%
|
|
2.40
|
||||||||||||||||||
CMBS-
CDO
|
23,500
|
20,825
|
1,236
|
(890
|
)
|
21,171
|
2
|
BB
|
9.41%
|
|
11.86%
|
|
7.67
|
||||||||||||||||||
CMBS-
B-Note
|
280,243
|
268,346
|
5,352
|
(428
|
)
|
273,270
|
41
|
BB
|
6.58%
|
|
7.51%
|
|
5.80
|
||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured
REIT Debt
|
953,895
|
966,772
|
18,855
|
(7,380
|
)
|
978,247
|
96
|
BBB-
|
6.36%
|
|
6.07%
|
|
5.97
|
||||||||||||||||||
ABS-Manufactured
Housing
|
80,839
|
76,695
|
2,176
|
(1,591
|
)
|
77,280
|
9
|
BBB-
|
6.68%
|
|
7.80%
|
|
6.37
|
||||||||||||||||||
ABS-Home
Equity
|
698,710
|
683,836
|
469
|
(54,672
|
)
|
629,633
|
122
|
BBB+
|
7.13%
|
|
7.82%
|
|
2.35
|
||||||||||||||||||
ABS-Franchise
|
82,669
|
82,230
|
1,114
|
(3,250
|
)
|
80,094
|
22
|
BBB
|
7.46%
|
|
8.21%
|
|
4.62
|
||||||||||||||||||
Agency
RMBS (C)
|
1,348,562
|
1,356,668
|
3,871
|
(5,597
|
)
|
1,354,942
|
42
|
AAA
|
5.29%
|
|
5.26%
|
|
4.33
|
||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Average
(A)
|
5,627,051
|
5,571,101
|
60,931
|
(91,132
|
)
|
5,540,900
|
585
|
A-
|
6.16%
|
|
6.45%
|
|
4.88
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residual
interest (B)
|
40,279
|
40,279
|
-
|
-
|
40,279
|
1
|
NR
|
0.00%
|
|
18.77%
|
|
2.29
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total/Average
|
$
|
5,667,330
|
$
|
5,611,380
|
$
|
60,931
|
$
|
(91,132
|
)
|
$
|
5,581,179
|
586
|
BBB+
|
6.12%
|
|
6.53%
|
|
4.86
|
|||||||||||||
(A)
|
The total current face amount of fixed rate securities was $4.5 billion, and of floating rate securities was $1.2 billion. |
(B) | Represents the equity from the Securitization Trust as described in Note 5. These securities have been treated as part of the residential mortgage loan segment - see Note 2. The residual does not have a stated coupon and therefore its coupon has been treated as zero for purposes of the table. |
(C)
|
Agency RMBS have an implied AAA rating. |
Unrealized
losses that are considered other than temporary are recognized currently in
income. There were no such losses incurred during the three months ended March
31, 2007. The unrealized losses on Newcastle’s securities are primarily the
result of market factors, rather than credit impairment, and Newcastle believes
their carrying values are fully recoverable over their expected holding period.
None of the securities had principal in default as of March 31, 2007. Newcastle
has performed credit analyses in relation to such securities which support
its
belief that the carrying values of such securities are fully recoverable over
their expected holding period. Although management expects to hold these
securities until their recovery, there is no assurance that such securities
will
not be sold or at what price they may be sold.
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
in an Unrealized Loss Position
|
Current
Face Amount
|
Amortized
Cost Basis
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Carrying
Value
|
Number
of
Securities
|
S&P
Equivalent
Rating
|
Coupon
|
Yield
|
Maturity
(Years)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Less
Than Twelve Months
|
$
|
1,390,610
|
$
|
1,364,801
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(54,184
|
)
|
$
|
1,310,617
|
208
|
A-
|
6.36%
|
|
6.77%
|
|
4.54
|
|||||||||||||
Twelve
or More Months
|
1,477,400
|
1,489,045
|
-
|
(36,948
|
)
|
1,452,097
|
170
|
A
|
5.62%
|
5.46%
|
|
5.32
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
2,868,010
|
$
|
2,853,846
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(91,132
|
)
|
$
|
2,762,714
|
378
|
A-
|
5.98%
|
|
6.09%
|
|
4.94
|
|||||||||||||
As
of
March 31, 2007, Newcastle had $166.1 million of restricted cash held in CBO
financing structures pending its investment in real estate securities and loans.
9
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
4.
REAL ESTATE RELATED LOANS, RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS AND SUBPRIME MORTGAGE
LOANS
The
following is a summary
of real
estate related loans, residential mortgage loans and subprime mortgage loans
at
March 31, 2007. The loans contain various terms, including fixed and floating
rates, self-amortizing and interest only. They are generally subject to
prepayment.
Loan
Type
|
Current
Face
Amount
|
Carrying
Value
|
Loan
Count
|
Wtd.
Avg.
Yield
|
Weighted
Average Maturity
(Years)
(E)
|
Delinquent
Carrying Amount
(F)
|
|||||||||||||
Mezzanine
Loans (A)
|
$
|
1,223,656
|
$
|
1,219,082
|
26
|
9.25%
|
|
2.77
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||
Bank
Loans
|
347,226
|
347,056
|
11
|
8.06%
|
|
4.40
|
-
|
||||||||||||
B-Notes
|
345,960
|
344,613
|
12
|
8.20%
|
|
2.66
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Whole
Loans
|
107,881
|
108,348
|
4
|
10.30%
|
|
1.98
|
-
|
||||||||||||
ICH
Loans (B)
|
121,649
|
119,875
|
68
|
7.63%
|
|
0.89
|
3,284
|
||||||||||||
Total
Real Estate Related Loans
|
$
|
2,146,372
|
$
|
2,138,974
|
121
|
8.85%
|
|
2.87
|
$
|
3,284
|
|||||||||
Residential
Loans
|
$
|
140,549
|
$
|
144,168
|
423
|
6.39%
|
|
2.79
|
$
|
4,203
|
|||||||||
Manufactured
Housing Loans
|
617,924
|
608,422
|
17,660
|
8.56%
|
|
5.79
|
6,293
|
||||||||||||
Total
Residential Mortgage Loans
|
$
|
758,473
|
$
|
752,590
|
18,083
|
8.14%
|
|
5.23
|
$
|
10,496
|
|||||||||
Subprime
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale (D)
|
$
|
1,049,285
|
$
|
1,018,080
|
4,402
|
7.82%
|
|
2.54
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||
Subprime
Mortgage Loans Subject to Call Option (C)
|
$
|
299,176
|
$
|
289,021
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(A) |
One
of these loans has an $8.9 million contractual exit fee which
Newcastle
will begin to accrue when management believes it is probable
that such
exit fee will be received.
|
(B) |
In
October 2003, pursuant to FIN No. 46, Newcastle consolidated an entity
which holds a portfolio of commercial mortgage loans which has been
securitized. This investment, which is referred to as the ICH CMO,
was
previously treated as a non-consolidated residual interest in such
securitization. The primary effect of the consolidation is the requirement
that Newcastle reflect the gross loan assets and gross bonds payable
of
this entity in its financial
statements.
|
(C) |
See
Note 5.
|
(D) |
In
March 2007, Newcastle, through a consolidated subsidiary, entered
into an
agreement to acquire a portfolio of residential mortgage loans to
subprime
borrowers (the “Subprime Portfolio II”). Based upon the due diligence
review, which was completed in April 2007, the final loan portfolio
is
$1.3 billion of unpaid principal balance. At March 31, 2007, $1.0
billion
of loans have been purchased and are considered “held for sale” and
carried at the lower of cost or fair value. No write down was recorded
related to these loans. Furthermore, the acquisition of loans held
for
sale is considered an operating activity for statement of cash flow
purposes. Newcastle entered into an interest rate swap in order to
hedge
its exposure to the risk of changes in market interest rates with
respect
to the financing of the Subprime Portfolio II. This swap is marked
to
market through income with the related portion of the hedged item,
to the
extent that the purchase has been consummated and the swap qualifies
as a
fair value hedge for accounting purposes, also marked to market through
income. The unfunded portion of the loan is treated as a non-hedge
derivative for accounting purposes and is marked to market through
income.
The carrying value of the loans at March 31, 2007 included approximately
$10.0 million related to principal receivable, interest receivable
and
basis adjustments.
|
(E) |
The
weighted average maturities for the residential loan portfolio and
the two
manufactured housing loan portfolios were calculated based on constant
prepayment rates (CPR) of 30%, 8% and 9%,
respectively.
|
(F) |
This
face amount of loans is 60 or more days past due, in foreclosure
or real
estate owned, representing 3.0% and 1.0% of the total current face
amounts
of the Residential Loans and the Manufactured Housing Loans,
respectively.
|
The
following is a reconciliation of loss allowance.
Real
Estate
Related
Loans
|
Residential
Mortgage
Loans
|
||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
$
|
(2,150
|
)
|
$
|
(7,256
|
)
|
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
(100
|
)
|
(1,936
|
)
|
|||
Realized
losses
|
-
|
2,955
|
|||||
Balance
at March 31, 2007
|
$
|
(2,250
|
)
|
$
|
(6,237
|
)
|
10
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
Newcastle
has entered into total rate of return swaps with major investment banks to
finance certain loans whereby Newcastle receives the sum of all interest, fees
and any positive change in value amounts (the total return cash flows) from
a
reference asset with a specified notional amount, and pays interest on such
notional plus any negative change in value amounts from such asset. These
agreements are recorded in Derivative Assets and treated as non-hedge
derivatives for accounting purposes and are therefore marked to market through
income. Net interest received is recorded to Interest Income and the mark to
market is recorded to Other Income. If Newcastle owned the reference assets
directly, they would not be marked to market. Under the agreements, Newcastle
is
required to post an initial margin deposit to an interest bearing account and
additional margin may be payable in the event of a decline in value of the
reference asset. Any margin on deposit (recorded in Restricted Cash), less
any
negative change in value amounts, will be returned to Newcastle upon termination
of the contract.
As
of
March 31, 2007, Newcastle held an aggregate of $418.9 million notional amount
of
total rate of return swaps on 7 reference assets on which it had deposited
$66.1
million of margin. These total rate of return swaps had an aggregate fair value
of approximately $1.3 million, a weighted average receive interest rate of
LIBOR
+ 2.24 %, a weighted average pay interest rate of LIBOR + 0.65 %, and a weighted
average swap maturity of 1.05 years.
5.
SECURITIZATION OF SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LOANS
In
March
2006, Newcastle, through a consolidated subsidiary, acquired a portfolio of
approximately 11,300 residential mortgage loans to subprime borrowers (the
“Subprime Portfolio I”) for $1.50 billion. The loans are being serviced by
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, an affiliate of the Manager, for a servicing fee
equal
to 0.50% per annum on the unpaid principal balance of the Subprime Portfolio
I.
In
April
2006, Newcastle, through Newcastle Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-1 (the
“Securitization Trust”), closed on a securitization of the Subprime Portfolio I.
The Securitization Trust is not consolidated by Newcastle. Newcastle sold the
Subprime Portfolio I and the related interest rate swap to the Securitization
Trust. The Securitization Trust issued $1.45 billion of debt (the “Notes”).
Newcastle retained $37.6 million face amount of the low investment grade Notes
and all of the equity issued by the Securitization Trust. The Notes have a
stated maturity of March 25, 2036. Newcastle, as holder of the equity of the
Securitization Trust, has the option to redeem the Notes once the aggregate
principal balance of the Subprime Portfolio I is equal to or less than 20%
of
such balance at the date of the transfer. The proceeds from the securitization
were used to repay the repurchase agreement described above.
11
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
The
following table presents information on the retained interests in the
securitization of the Subprime Portfolio I, which include the residual interest
and the retained notes described above, and the sensitivity of their fair value
to call
date
for
immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in the assumptions utilized in calculating
such fair value, at March 31, 2007:
Total
securitized loans (unpaid principal balance)
|
$
|
1,105,213
|
||
Loans
subject to call option (carrying value)
|
$
|
289,021
|
||
Retained
interests (fair value)
|
$
|
69,382
|
||
Weighted
average life (years) of residual interest
|
2.29
|
|||
Expected
credit losses (A)
|
5.2%
|
|
||
Effect
on fair
value of retained interests of 10% adverse change
|
$
|
(2,482
|
)
|
|
Effect
on fair
value of retained interests of 20% adverse change
|
$
|
(5,224
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average constant prepayment rate (B)
|
30.5%
|
|
||
Effect
on fair
value of retained interests of 10% adverse change
|
$
|
(3,441
|
)
|
|
Effect
on fair
value of retained interests of 20% adverse change
|
$
|
(5,605
|
)
|
|
Discount
rate
|
18.8%
|
|
||
Effect
on fair
value of retained interests of 10% adverse change
|
$
|
(2,242
|
)
|
|
Effect
on fair
value of retained interests of 20% adverse change
|
$
|
(4,391
|
)
|
|
(A) |
Represents
the percentage of losses on the original principal balance of the
loans at
the time of securitization (April 2006) to the maturity of the
loans.
|
(B) |
Represents
the weighted average prepayment rate for the loans as of March 31,
2007
until maturity of such loans.
|
The
sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and should be used with caution. In
particular, the results are calculated by stressing a particular economic
assumption independent of changes in any other assumption; in practice, changes
in one factor may result in changes in another, which might counteract or
amplify the sensitivities. Also, changes in the fair value based on a 10% or
20%
variation in an assumption generally may not be extrapolated because the
relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may
not
be linear.
The
following table summarizes principal amounts outstanding and delinquencies
of
the securitized loans as of March 31, 2007 and net credit losses for the period
then ended:
Loan
unpaid
principal balance (UPB)
|
$
|
1,105,213
|
||
Delinquencies
of 60
or more days (UPB)
|
$
|
47,107
|
||
Net
credit
losses
|
$
|
197
|
Delinquencies
include loans 60 or more days past due, in foreclosure or real estate owned,
representing 4.3% of the total unpaid principal balance. Newcastle received
net
cash inflows of $2.9 million from the retained interests during the three months
ended March 31, 2007.
The
weighted average yield of the retained notes was 11.06% and the weighted average
funding cost of the related repurchase agreement was 5.73% as of March 31,
2007.
The loans subject to call option and the corresponding financing recognize
interest income and expense based on the expected weighted average coupon of
the
loans subject to call option at the call date of 9.24%. At March 31, 2007
included in retained interests is the unamortized cost of retained notes of
$34.6 million with a fair value of $29.1 million based on dealer
quotations.
12
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
6.
RECENT ACTIVITIES
In
January 2007, Newcastle issued 2.42 million shares of its common stock in a
public offering at a price to the public of $31.30 per share for net proceeds
of
approximately $75.0 million. For the purpose of compensating the Manager for
its
successful efforts in raising capital for Newcastle, in connection with this
offering, Newcastle granted options to the Manager to purchase 242,000 shares
of
Newcastle’s common stock at the public offering price, which were valued at
approximately $0.8 million.
In
January and February 2007, certain of the Manager’s employees exercised options
to acquire 75,882 shares of Newcastle’s common stock for net proceeds of $1.3
million.
In
January 2007, Newcastle entered into a $700 million non-recourse warehouse
agreement with a major investment bank to finance a portfolio of real estate
related loans and securities prior to them being financed with a CBO. The
financing primarily bore interest at LIBOR + 0.50% and was terminated
simultaneously with the closing of the CBO financing in May 2007.
In
February 2007, Newcastle filed a new registration statement with the SEC to
replace the previous shelf registration statement to issue various types of
securities, such as common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, debt
securities and warrants. The new shelf registration statement covers an
unspecified amount of securities that can be offered.
In
February 2007, Newcastle entered into a $400 million facility in the form of
a
repurchase agreement with a major investment bank to finance our investments
in
real estate related loans from time to time. The repurchase agreement has a
rolling maturity of one year, with a maximum maturity of February 2010. The
financing bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable spread which varies
depending on the type of assets.
In
March
2007, Newcastle issued 2.0 million shares ($50.0 million face amount) of its
8.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred”)
for net proceeds of approximately $48.4 million. The Series D Preferred is
non-voting, has a $25 per share liquidation preference, no maturity date and
no
mandatory redemption. Newcastle has the option to redeem the Series D
Preferred beginning in March 2012.
In
March
2007, Newcastle entered into an agreement to acquire a portfolio of
approximately 7,300 residential mortgage loans to subprime borrowers (the
“Subprime Portfolio II”) for up to $1.70 billion of unpaid principal balance.
Based upon the due diligence review, which was completed in April 2007, the
final loan portfolio is $1.3 billion of unpaid principal balance.
Furthermore, Newcastle is entitled to an early payment default protection under
which the seller will repurchase mortgage loans that fail to make the first,
second or third monthly payment due after the respective purchase dates. At
March 31, 2007, $1.0 billion of loans have been purchased and are considered
“held for sale” for accounting purposes. This acquisition was initially funded
with a repurchase agreement which bore interest at LIBOR + 0.60%. Newcastle
entered into an interest rate swap in order to hedge its exposure to the risk
of
changes in market interest rates with respect to the financing of the Subprime
Portfolio II. The loans are being serviced by Nationstar Mortgage LLC, an
affiliate of the Manager, for a servicing fee equal to 0.50% per annum on the
unpaid principal balance of the Subprime Portfolio II.
In
April
2007, Newcastle issued 4.56 million shares of its common stock in a public
offering at a price to the public of $27.75 per share for net proceeds of
approximately $124.9 million. For the purpose of compensating the Manager for
its successful efforts in raising capital for Newcastle, in connection with
this
offering, Newcastle granted options to the Manager to purchase 456,000 shares
of
Newcastle’s common stock at the public offering price, which were valued at
approximately $1.2 million.
In
May
2007, Newcastle completed its tenth CBO financing to term finance $825.0 million
portfolio of real estate related loans and securities. Newcastle issued, through
a consolidated subsidiary, $710.5 million of investment grade notes in the
offering. At closing, the investment grade notes have an initial weighted
average spread over LIBOR of 0.70% and a weighted average life of 7 years.
Approximately 82%, or $585.8 million, of the investment grade notes are rated
AAA through AA- and were sold to third parties. The remaining $124.7 million
of
investment grade notes rated A+ through BBB- have been retained and financed.
Newcastle has also retained the below investment grade notes and preferred
shares of the offering.
In
April
2007, Newcastle entered into a facility, in the form of repurchase agreement,
with a major investment bank to finance acquisitions of real estate related
loans from time to time. The facility provides for the financing of assets
of up to $400.0 million and bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable spread,
which varies depending on the type of assets being financed. The facility
has a rolling one year maturity.
13
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
MARCH
31,
2007
(dollars
in tables in thousands, except share data)
7.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The
following table summarizes the notional amounts and fair (carrying) values
of
Newcastle's derivative financial instruments, excluding the total rate of return
swap arrangements described in Note 4, as of March 31, 2007.
Notional
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
Longest
Maturity
|
||||||||
Interest
rate swaps, treated as hedges (A)
|
$
|
4,864,785
|
$
|
26,831
|
Mar
2017
|
|||||
Interest
rate caps, treated as hedges (A)
|
316,926
|
903
|
October
2015
|
|||||||
Non-hedge
derivative obligations (A) (B)
|
977,784
|
(702
|
)
|
July
2038
|
||||||
(A) |
Included
in Derivative Assets or Derivative Liabilities, as applicable.
Derivative
Liabilities also include accrued interest.
|
(B) |
Represents
two essentially offsetting interest rate caps and two essentially
offsetting interest rate swaps, each with notional amounts of
$32.5
million, an interest rate cap with a notional amount of $17.5
million, and
the swap related to the unfunded portion of our purchase of subprime
mortgage loans with a notional amount of $337.0 million and the
swap that
economically hedges a portion of our Subprime Portfolio II but did
not qualify for hedge accounting with a notional amount of $492.2
million.
|
8.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Newcastle
is required to present both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic
EPS is calculated by dividing net income available for common stockholders
by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each
period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income available for common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding plus the additional dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
during each period. Newcastle’s common stock equivalents are its outstanding
stock options. Net income available for common stockholders is equal to net
income less preferred dividends.
The
following is a reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding on a diluted basis.
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding,
basic
|
47,572,895
|
43,944,820
|
|||||
Dilutive
effect of stock options, based on the treasury stock
method
|
250,602
|
119,120
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding,
diluted
|
47,823,497
|
44,063,940
|
As
of
March 31, 2007, Newcastle’s outstanding options were summarized as
follows:
Held
by the Manager
|
1,138,005
|
|||
Issued
to the Manager and subsequently transferred to certain of the Manager's
employees
|
897,920
|
|||
Held
by the independent directors
|
14,000
|
|||
Total
|
2,049,925
|
|||
14
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS
The
following should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated
financial statements and notes included herein.
GENERAL
Newcastle
Investment Corp. is a real estate investment and finance company. We invest
in
real estate securities, loans and other real estate related assets. In addition,
we consider other opportunistic investments which capitalize on our manager’s
expertise and which we believe present attractive risk/return profiles and
are
consistent with our investment guidelines. We seek to deliver stable dividends
and attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders through prudent asset
selection, active management and the use of match funded financing structures,
when appropriate, which reduce our interest rate and financing risks. Our
objective is to maximize the difference between the yield on our investments
and
the cost of financing these investments while hedging our interest rate risk.
We
emphasize asset quality, diversification, match funded financing and credit
risk
management.
We
currently own a diversified portfolio of moderately credit sensitive real estate
debt investments including securities and loans. Our portfolio of real estate
securities includes commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS), senior
unsecured debt issued by property REITs, real estate related asset backed
securities (ABS), and agency residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS).
Mortgage backed securities are interests in or obligations secured by pools
of
mortgage loans. We generally target investments rated A through BB, except
for
our agency RMBS which are generally considered AAA rated. We also own, directly
and indirectly, interest in loans and pools of loans, including real estate
related loans, commercial mortgage loans, residential mortgage loans,
manufactured housing loans, and subprime mortgage loans. We also own, directly
and indirectly, interests in operating real estate.
We
employ
leverage in order to achieve our return objectives. We do not have a
predetermined target debt to equity ratio as we believe the appropriate leverage
for the particular assets we are financing depends on the credit quality of
those assets. As of March 31, 2007, our debt to equity ratio was approximately
8.7 to 1. Also, on a pro forma basis, our debt to equity ratio would have been
7.9 to 1 if the trust preferred securities we issued in March 2006 were
considered equity for purposes of this computation.
We
maintain access to a broad array of capital resources in an effort to insulate
our business from potential fluctuations in the availability of capital. We
utilize multiple forms of financing including collateralized bond obligations
(CBOs), other securitizations, term loans, a credit facility, and trust
preferred securities, as well as short term financing in the form of repurchase
agreements and asset backed commercial paper.
We
seek
to match fund our investments with respect to interest rates and maturities
in
order to minimize the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and
reduce the risk of refinancing our liabilities prior to the maturity of the
investments. We seek to finance a substantial portion of our real estate
securities and loans through the issuance of debt securities in the form of
CBOs, which are obligations issued in multiple classes secured by an underlying
portfolio of securities. Our CBO financings offer us the structural flexibility
to buy and sell certain investments to manage risk and, subject to certain
limitations, to optimize returns.
Market
Considerations
Our
ability to maintain our dividends and grow our business is dependent on our
ability to invest our capital on a timely basis at yields which exceed our
cost
of capital. The primary market factor that bears on this is credit
spread.
Generally
speaking, tightening credit spreads increase the unrealized gains on our current
investments and reduce our financing costs, but reduce the yields available
on
potential new investments, while widening credit spreads reduce the unrealized
gains on our current investments (or cause unrealized losses) and increase
our
financing costs, but increase the yields available on potential new
investments.
In
the
first three months of 2007, credit spreads widened, increasing the yield we
can
earn on certain new investments. This widening of credit spreads and declining
interest rates caused the net unrealized gains on our securities and
derivatives, recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, and therefore
our book value per share, to decrease and resulted in net unrealized losses.
One
of the key drivers for the widening of credit spreads has been the recent
disruption in the subprime mortgage lending sector. Furthermore, this
widening of credit spreads has spilled over to the CMBS sector as well as to
the
financing market.
If
credit
spreads widen, we expect that our new investment activities will benefit and
our
earnings will increase, although our net book value per share, and the ability
to realize gains from existing investments, may decrease.
Certain
aspects of these effects are more fully described in “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Interest Rate,
Credit and Spread Risk” as well as in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk.”
15
Organization
Our
initial public offering occurred in October 2002. The following table presents
information on shares of our common stock issued since our
formation:
Year
|
Shares
Issued
|
Range
of Issue Prices (1)
|
Net
Proceeds
(millions)
|
|||||
Formation
|
16,488,517
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|||||
2002
|
7,000,000
|
$13.00
|
$80.0
|
|||||
2003
|
7,886,316
|
$20.35-$22.85
|
$163.4
|
|||||
2004
|
8,484,648
|
$26.30-$31.40
|
$224.3
|
|||||
2005
|
4,053,928
|
$29.60
|
$108.2
|
|||||
2006
|
1,800,408
|
$29.42
|
$51.2
|
|||||
Three
Months 2007
|
2,495,882
|
$31.30
|
$76.3
|
|||||
March
31, 2007
|
48,209,699
|
|
|
|||||
April
2007
|
4,560,000
|
$27.75
|
$124.9
|
|||||
|
(1) Excludes
prices of shares issued pursuant to the exercise of options and of shares
issued
to Newcastle's independent directors.
As
of
April 27, 2007, approximately 5.1 million shares of our common stock were held
by our manager, through affiliates, and its principals. In addition, our
manager, through its affiliates, held options to purchase approximately 1.6
million shares of our common stock at April 27, 2007.
We
are
organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. As such, we will generally not be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on that portion of our income that is distributed to stockholders
if
we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders by
prescribed dates and comply with various other requirements.
We
conduct our business by investing in three primary business segments: (i) real
estate securities and real estate related loans, (ii) residential mortgage
loans
and (iii) operating real estate.
Revenues
attributable to each segment are disclosed below (unaudited) (in
thousands).
For
the Three
Months
Ended
March
31,
|
Real
Estate
Securities
and Real
Estate
Related
Loans
|
Residential
Mortgage
Loans
|
Operating
Real
Estate
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
$
|
135,419
|
$
|
29,646
|
$
|
1,284
|
$
|
80
|
$
|
166,429
|
|||||||
2006
|
$
|
95,193
|
$
|
26,029
|
$
|
2,184
|
$
|
142
|
$
|
123,548
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
16
APPLICATION
OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management's
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared
in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use
of
estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts of assets
and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from
these
estimates. Management believes that the estimates and assumptions utilized
in
the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are prudent and
reasonable. Actual results have been in line with management’s estimates and
judgments used in applying each of the accounting policies described below.
The
following is a summary of our accounting policies that are most effected by
judgments, estimates and assumptions.
Variable
Interest Entities
In
December 2003, Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (“FIN”) No.
46R “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” was issued as a modification
of FIN 46. FIN 46R clarified the methodology for determining whether an entity
is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and the methodology for assessing who is
the primary beneficiary of a VIE.
VIEs are
defined as entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics
of
a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for
the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial
support from other parties. A VIE is required to be consolidated by its primary
beneficiary, and only by its primary beneficiary, which is defined as the party
who will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses or receive a majority of
the expected residual returns as a result of holding variable
interests.
Prior
to
the adoption of FIN 46R, we consolidated our existing CBO transactions (the
“CBO
Entities”) because we own the entire equity interest in each of them,
representing a substantial portion of their capitalization, and we control
the
management and resolution of their assets. We have determined that certain
of
the CBO Entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of each of
these VIEs and therefore continue to consolidate them. We have also determined
that the application of FIN 46R did not result in a change in our accounting
for
any other entities which were previously consolidated. However, it did cause
us
to consolidate one entity which was previously not consolidated, ICH CMO, as
described below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Furthermore, as a
result of FIN 46R, we are precluded from consolidating our wholly owned
subsidiary which has issued trust preferred securities as described in
“Liquidity and Capital Resources” below. We will continue to analyze future CBO
entities, as well as other investments, pursuant to the requirements of FIN
46R.
These analyses require considerable judgment in determining the primary
beneficiary of a VIE since they involve subjective probability weighting of
subjectively determined possible cash flow scenarios. The result could be the
consolidation of an entity acquired or formed in the future that would otherwise
not have been consolidated or the non-consolidation of such an entity that
would
otherwise have been consolidated.
Valuation
and Impairment of Securities
We
have
classified our real estate securities as available for sale. As such, they
are
carried at fair value with net unrealized gains or losses reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Fair value is based
primarily upon broker quotations, as well as counterparty quotations, which
provide valuation estimates based upon reasonable market order indications
or a
good faith estimate thereof. These quotations are subject to significant
variability based on market conditions, such as interest rates and credit
spreads. Changes in market conditions, as well as changes in the assumptions
or
methodology used to determine fair value, could result in a significant increase
or decrease in our book equity. We must also assess whether unrealized losses
on
securities, if any, reflect a decline in value which is other than temporary
and, accordingly, write the impaired security down to its value through
earnings. For example, a decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary
if it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to
the contractual terms of a security which was not impaired at acquisition,
or if
we do not have the ability and intent to hold a security in an unrealized loss
position until its anticipated recovery (if any). Temporary declines in value
generally result from changes in market factors, such as market interest rates
and credit spreads, or from certain macroeconomic events, including market
disruptions and supply changes, which do not directly impact our ability to
collect amounts contractually due. We
continually evaluate the credit status of each of our securities and the
collateral supporting our securities. This evaluation includes a review of
the
credit of the issuer of the security (if applicable), the credit rating of
the
security, the key terms of the security (including credit support), debt service
coverage and loan to value ratios, the performance of the pool of underlying
loans and the estimated value of the collateral supporting such loans, including
the effect of local, industry and broader economic trends and factors. These
factors include loan default expectations and loss severities, which are
analyzed in connection with a particular security’s credit support, as well as
prepayment rates. The result of this evaluation is considered in relation to
the
amount of the unrealized loss and the period elapsed since it was incurred.
Significant judgment is required in this analysis.
17
Revenue
Recognition on Securities
Income
on
these securities is recognized using a level yield methodology based upon a
number of cash flow assumptions that are subject to uncertainties and
contingencies. Such assumptions include the rate and timing of principal and
interest receipts (which may be subject to prepayments and defaults). These
assumptions are updated on at least a quarterly basis to reflect changes related
to a particular security, actual historical data, and market changes. These
uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and are subject to
future events, and economic and market conditions, which may alter the
assumptions. For securities acquired at a discount for credit losses, the net
income recognized is based on a “loss adjusted yield” whereby a gross interest
yield is recorded to Interest Income, offset by a provision for probable,
incurred credit losses which is accrued on a periodic basis to Provision for
Credit Losses. The provision is determined based on an evaluation of the credit
status of securities, as described in connection with the analysis of impairment
above.
Valuation
of Derivatives
Similarly,
our derivative instruments are carried at fair value pursuant to Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended. Fair value is based on
counterparty quotations. To the extent they qualify as cash flow hedges under
SFAS No. 133, net unrealized gains or losses are reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income; otherwise, they are reported currently
in income. To the extent they qualify as fair value hedges, net unrealized
gains
or losses on both the derivative and the related portion of the hedged item are
reported currently in income. Fair values of such derivatives are subject to
significant variability based on many of the same factors as the securities
discussed above. The results of such variability could be a significant increase
or decrease in our book equity and/or earnings.
Impairment
of Loans
We
purchase, directly and indirectly, real estate related, commercial mortgage
and
residential mortgage loans, including manufactured housing loans and subprime
mortgage loans, to be held for investment. We must periodically evaluate each
of
these loans or loan pools for possible impairment. Impairment is indicated
when
it is deemed probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan, or, for loans acquired at a
discount for credit losses, when it is deemed probable that we will be unable
to
collect as anticipated. Upon determination of impairment, we would establish
a
specific valuation allowance with a corresponding charge to earnings. We
continually evaluate our loans receivable for impairment. Our residential
mortgage loans, including manufactured housing loans, are aggregated into pools
for evaluation based on like characteristics, such as loan type and acquisition
date. Individual loans are evaluated based on an analysis of the borrower’s
performance, the credit rating of the borrower, debt service coverage and loan
to value ratios, the estimated value of the underlying collateral, the key
terms
of the loan, and the effect of local, industry and broader economic trends
and
factors. Pools of loans are also evaluated based on similar criteria, including
trends in defaults and loss severities for the type and seasoning of loans
being
evaluated. This information is used to estimate specific impairment charges
on
individual loans as well as provisions for estimated unidentified incurred
losses on pools of loans. Significant judgment is required both in determining
impairment and in estimating the resulting loss allowance.
Revenue
Recognition on Loans
Income
on
these loans is recognized similarly to that on our securities and is subject
to
similar uncertainties and contingencies, which are also analyzed on at least
a
quarterly basis. For loan pools acquired at a discount for credit losses, the
net income recognized is based on a “loss adjusted yield” whereby a gross
interest yield is recorded to Interest Income, offset by a provision for
probable, incurred credit losses which is accrued on a periodic basis to
Provision for Credit Losses. The provision is determined based on an evaluation
of the loans as described under “Impairment of Loans” above. A rollforward of
the provision is included in Note 4 to our consolidated financial
statements.
Impairment
of Operating Real Estate
We
own
operating real estate held for investment. We review our operating real estate
for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Upon determination
of impairment, we would record a write-down of the asset, which would be charged
to earnings. Significant judgment is required both in determining impairment
and
in estimating the resulting write-down. To date, we have determined that no
write-downs have been necessary on the operating real estate in our portfolio.
In addition, when operating real estate is classified as held for sale, it
must
be recorded at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less costs of
sale. Significant judgment is required in determining the fair value of such
properties.
Accounting
Treatment for Certain Investments Financed with Repurchase
Agreements
We
owned
$253.7 million of assets purchased from particular counterparties which are
financed via $201.6 million of repurchase agreements with the same
counterparties at March 31, 2007. Currently, we record such assets and the
related financings gross on our balance sheet, and the corresponding interest
income and interest expense gross on our income statement. In addition, if
the
asset is a security, any change in fair value is reported through other
comprehensive income (since it is considered “available for sale”).
18
However,
in a transaction where assets are acquired from and financed under a repurchase
agreement with the same counterparty, the acquisition may not qualify as a
sale
from the seller’s perspective; in such cases, the seller may be required to
continue to consolidate the assets sold to us, based on their “continuing
involvement” with such investments. The result is that we may be precluded from
presenting the assets gross on our balance sheet as we currently do, and may
instead be required to treat our net investment in such assets as a derivative.
If
it is
determined that these transactions should be treated as investments in
derivatives, the interest rate swaps entered into by us to hedge our interest
rate exposure with respect to these transactions would no longer qualify for
hedge accounting, but would, as the underlying asset transactions, also be
marked to market through the income statement.
This
potential change in accounting treatment does not affect the economics of the
transactions but does affect how the transactions are reported in our financial
statements. Our cash flows, our liquidity and our ability to pay a dividend
would be unchanged, and we do not believe our taxable income would be affected.
Our net income and net equity would not be materially affected. In addition,
this would not affect Newcastle’s status as a REIT or cause it to fail to
qualify for its Investment Company Act exemption. This issue has been submitted
to accounting standard setters for resolution. If we were to change our current
accounting treatment for these transactions, our total assets and total
liabilities would each be reduced by approximately $202.3 million at March
31,
2007.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued interpretation
No.48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 requires companies to recognize the
tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely
than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. The tax
benefit recognized is the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50%
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We adopted FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on
our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
19
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following table summarizes the changes in our results of operations from the
three months ended March 31, 2006 to the three months ended March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands):
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007/2006
|
||||||||||
Period
to Period
|
||||||||||
Change
|
Percent
Change
|
Explanation
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
48,314
|
42.4%
|
|
(1)
|
|
||||
Rental
and escalation income
|
(755
|
)
|
(37.6%
|
)
|
(2)
|
|
||||
Gain
on sale of investments
|
284
|
14.7%
|
|
(3)
|
|
|||||
Other
income
|
(4,962
|
)
|
(87.0%
|
)
|
(4)
|
|
||||
Interest
expense
|
39,792
|
51.7%
|
|
(1)
|
|
|||||
Property
operating expense
|
218
|
26.7%
|
|
(2)
|
|
|||||
Loan
and security servicing expense
|
(23
|
)
|
(1.1%
|
)
|
(1)
|
|
||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
29
|
1.4%
|
|
(5)
|
|
|||||
Provision
for losses, loans held for sale
|
(4,127
|
)
|
(100.0%
|
)
|
(6)
|
|
||||
General
and administrative expense
|
(293
|
)
|
(18.0%
|
)
|
(7)
|
|
||||
Management
fee to affiliate
|
435
|
12.5%
|
|
(8)
|
|
|||||
Incentive
compensation to affiliate
|
836
|
29.3%
|
|
(8)
|
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
130
|
65.3%
|
|
(2)
|
|
|||||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
(348
|
)
|
(29.1%
|
)
|
(9)
|
|
||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
|
5,536
|
18.1%
|
|
(1)
|
Changes
in interest income and expense are primarily related to our acquisition
and disposition during these periods of interest bearing assets and
related financings, as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007/2006
|
|||||||
Period
to Period Increase (Decrease)
|
|||||||
Interest
Income
|
Interest
Expense
|
||||||
Real
estate security and loan portfolios (A)
|
$
|
24,099
|
$
|
16,852
|
|||
Agency
RMBS
|
7,657
|
7,227
|
|||||
Other
real estate related loans
|
10,930
|
4,746
|
|||||
Subprime
mortgage loan portfolio
|
1,432
|
1,225
|
|||||
Credit
facility and junior subordinated notes
|
-
|
2,832
|
|||||
Manufactured
housing loan portfolio (B)
|
9,307
|
5,957
|
|||||
Other
(C)
|
502
|
2,901
|
|||||
Other
real estate related loans (D)
|
(3,836
|
)
|
(576
|
)
|
|||
Residential
mortgage loan portfolio (D)
|
(1,777
|
)
|
(1,372
|
)
|
|||
$
|
48,314
|
$
|
39,792
|
||||
(A) |
Represents
our CBO financings and the acquisition of related collateral in these
periods.
|
(B) |
Primarily
due to the acquisition of a manufactured housing loan pool in the
third
quarter of 2006.
|
(C) |
Primarily
due to increasing interest rates on floating rate assets and liabilities
owned during the entire period.
|
(D) |
These
loans received paydowns during the period which served to offset
the
amounts listed above.
|
Changes
in loan and security servicing expense are also primarily due to these
acquisitions and paydowns.
(2)
|
These
changes are primarily the results of the acceleration of lease termination
income in the first quarter of 2006, offset by the effect of foreign
currency fluctuations and the foreclosure of $12.2 million of loans
in
March 2006.
|
(3)
|
This
change is primarily a result of the volume of sales of real estate
securities. Sales of real estate securities are based on a number
of
factors including credit, asset type and industry and can be expected
to
increase or decrease from time to time. Periodic fluctuations in
the
volume of sales of securities is dependent upon, among other things,
management’s assessment of credit risk, asset concentration, portfolio
balance and other factors.
|
(4)
|
This
change is primarily the result of investments financed with total
rate of
return swaps which we treat as non-hedge derivatives and mark to
market
through the income statement, which is offset by the $5.5 million
gain
recorded in the first quarter of 2006 on the derivative used to hedge
the
interim financing of a pool of subprime mortgage loans, which did
not
qualify as a hedge for accounting purposes. This gain was offset
by the
loss described in (6) below.
|
20
(5)
|
This
change is primarily due to the acquisition of a manufactured housing
loan
pool at a discount for credit quality in the third quarter of
2006.
|
(6)
|
This
change represents the unrealized loss on a pool of subprime mortgage
loans
which was considered held for sale at March 31, 2006. This loss was
related to market factors and was offset by the gain described in
(4)
above.
|
(7)
|
The
change in general and administrative expense is primarily a result
of
decreased professional fees.
|
(8)
|
The
increase in management fees is a result of our increased size
resulting
from our equity issuances. The increase in incentive compensation
is
primarily a result of increased funds from operations, as described
below
under “Funds from Operations”.
|
(9)
|
This
change is primarily the result of a decrease in earnings from
an LLC which
owns franchise loans. During the periods presented, our investment
in this
LLC decreased due to an expected return of capital distributions
resulting
in a corresponding reduction in
earnings.
|
21
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including
ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain investments, and
other general business needs. Additionally, to maintain our status as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code, we must distribute annually at least 90% of
our
REIT taxable income. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of
net
cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under loans, and the issuance
of debt and equity securities. Additional sources of liquidity include
investments that are readily saleable prior to their maturity. Our debt
obligations are generally secured directly by our investment
assets.
We
expect
that our cash on hand and our cash flow provided by operations, as well as
our
credit facility, will satisfy our liquidity needs with respect to our current
investment portfolio over the next twelve months. However, we currently expect
to seek additional capital in order to grow our investment portfolio. We have
an
effective shelf registration statement with the SEC which allows us to issue
various types of securities, such as common stock, preferred stock, depositary
shares, debt securities and warrants from time to time. The shelf registration
statement covers an unspecified amount of securities that can be
offered.
We
expect
to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, specifically the repayment of
our
debt obligations, through additional borrowings and the liquidation or
refinancing of our assets at maturity. We believe that the value of these assets
is, and will continue to be, sufficient to repay our debt at maturity under
either scenario. Our ability to meet our long-term liquidity requirements
relating to capital required for the growth of our investment portfolio is
subject to obtaining additional equity and debt financing.
Decisions by investors and lenders to enter into such transactions with us
will
depend upon a number of factors, such as our historical and projected financial
performance, compliance with the terms of our current credit arrangements,
industry and market trends, the availability of capital and our investors’ and
lenders’ policies and rates applicable thereto, and the relative attractiveness
of alternative investment or lending opportunities. We maintain access to a
broad array of capital resources in an effort to insulate our business from
potential fluctuations in the availability of capital.
Our
ability to execute our business strategy, particularly the growth of our
investment portfolio, depends to a significant degree on our ability to obtain
additional capital. Our core business strategy is dependent upon our ability
to
finance our real estate securities, loans and other real estate related assets
with match funded debt at rates that provide a positive net spread. If spreads
for such liabilities widen or if demand for such liabilities ceases to exist,
then our ability to execute future financings will be severely restricted.
Furthermore, in an environment where spreads are tightening, if spreads tighten
on the assets we purchase to a greater degree than they tighten on the
liabilities we issue, our net spread will be reduced.
We
expect
to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through our cash flow
provided by operations and our credit facility, as well as investment specific
borrowings. In addition, at March 31, 2007 we had an unrestricted cash balance
of $3.9 million and an undrawn balance of $74.5 million on our credit facility.
In April 2007, we raised approximately $125.0 million through an issuance of
common shares. At May 4, 2007, the undrawn balance of our credit facility was
$200.0 million. Our cash flow provided by operations differs from our net income
due to five primary factors: (i) accretion of discount or premium on our real
estate securities and loans (including the accrual of interest and fees payable
at maturity), discount on our debt obligations, deferred financing costs and
interest rate cap premiums, and deferred hedge gains and losses, (ii) gains
and
losses from sales of assets financed with CBOs, (iii) depreciation and
straight-lined rental income of our operating real estate, (iv) the provision
for credit losses recorded in connection with our loan assets, and (v)
unrealized gains or losses on our non-hedge derivatives, particularly our total
return swaps. Proceeds from the sale of assets which serve as collateral for
our
CBO financings, including gains thereon, are required to be retained in the
CBO
structure until the related bonds are retired and are therefore not available
to
fund current cash needs. As of March 31, 2007, we had $166.1 million of
restricted cash held in CBO financing structures pending its investment in
real
estate securities and loans.
Our
match
funded investments are financed long-term and their credit status is
continuously monitored; therefore, these investments are expected to generate
a
generally stable current return, subject to interest rate fluctuations. See
“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk -- Interest Rate
Exposure” below. Our remaining investments, generally financed with short term
repurchase agreements and asset backed commercial paper, are also subject to
refinancing risk upon the maturity of the related debt. See “Debt Obligations”
below.
With
respect to our operating real estate, we expect to incur expenditures of
approximately $2.6 million relating to tenant improvements, in connection with
the inception of leases, and capital expenditures during the twelve months
ending March 31, 2008.
With
respect to two of our real estate related loans and the Subprime Portfolio
II,
we were committed to fund up to an additional $222.9 million at March 31, 2007,
subject to certain conditions to be met by the borrowers. Subsequent to March
31, 2007, we funded $220.4 million of these commitments through May 4,
2007.
As
described below, under “Interest Rate, Credit and Spread Risk,” we are subject
to margin calls in connection with our assets financed with repurchase
agreements or total rate of return swaps. Margin calls resulting from decreases
in value related to rising interest rates are substantially offset by our
ability to make margin calls on our interest rate derivatives. We do not expect
these potential margin calls to materially affect our financial condition,
liquidity or results of operations.
22
Debt
Obligations
The
following tables present certain information regarding our debt obligations
and
related hedges as of March 31, 2007 (unaudited) (dollars in
thousands):
Debt
Obligation/Collateral
|
Month
Issued
|
Current
Face
Amount
|
Carrying
Value
|
Unhedged
Weighted
Average
Funding
Cost
|
Final
Stated Maturity
|
Weighted
Average
Funding
Cost
(1)
|
Weighted
Average Maturity
(Years)
|
Face
Amount
of
Floating Rate Debt
|
Collateral
Carrying
Value
|
Collateral
Weighted Average Maturity
(Years)
|
Face
Amount
of
Floating Rate Collateral
|
Aggregate
Notional
Amount
of
Current
Hedges
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CBO
Bonds Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities
|
Jul
1999
|
$
|
366,155
|
$
|
363,529
|
7.83%
(2
|
)
|
Jul
2038
|
6.39%
|
|
1.63
|
$
|
271,155
|
$
|
495,383
|
3.84
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
237,306
|
|||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities and loans
|
Apr
2002
|
|
444,000
|
441,818
|
6.41%
(2
|
)
|
Apr
2037
|
6.77%
|
|
3.20
|
372,000
|
494,842
|
5.02
|
59,323
|
296,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities and loans
|
Mar
2003
|
|
472,000
|
469,076
|
6.22%
(2
|
)
|
Mar
2038
|
5.34%
|
|
5.05
|
427,800
|
511,404
|
4.36
|
121,870
|
285,060
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities and loans
|
Sep
2003
|
460,000
|
456,397
|
6.06%
(2
|
)
|
Sep
2038
|
5.87%
|
|
5.60
|
442,500
|
506,770
|
4.01
|
166,248
|
207,500
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities and loans
|
Mar
2004
|
414,000
|
411,140
|
5.92%
(2
|
)
|
Mar
2039
|
5.37%
|
|
5.36
|
382,750
|
444,943
|
4.64
|
167,170
|
177,300
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities and loans
|
Sep
2004
|
454,500
|
451,263
|
5.90%
(2
|
)
|
Sep
2039
|
5.48%
|
|
5.94
|
442,500
|
493,764
|
4.77
|
217,128
|
209,140
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities and loans
|
Apr
2005
|
447,000
|
442,997
|
5.78%
(2
|
)
|
Apr
2040
|
5.51%
|
|
6.91
|
439,600
|
478,187
|
5.58
|
195,718
|
242,895
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities
|
Dec
2005
|
442,800
|
438,987
|
5.82%
(2
|
)
|
Dec
2050
|
5.56%
|
|
8.23
|
436,800
|
499,396
|
6.98
|
121,426
|
341,506
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities and loans
|
Nov
2006
|
807,500
|
807,296
|
5.95%
(2
|
)
|
Nov
2052
|
5.89%
|
|
6.81
|
799,900
|
910,615
|
4.46
|
651,857
|
161,655
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4,307,955
|
4,282,503
|
5.79%
|
|
5.60
|
4,015,005
|
4,835,304
|
4.84
|
1,700,740
|
2,158,362
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
Bonds Payable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICH
loans (3)
|
(3)
|
|
100,164
|
100,164
|
6.78%
(2
|
)
|
Aug
2030
|
6.78%
|
|
0.85
|
1,740
|
119,875
|
0.89
|
1,740
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Manufactured
housing loans
|
Jan
2006
|
204,644
|
203,396
|
LIBOR+1.25
|
%
|
Jan
2009
|
6.14%
|
|
1.22
|
204,644
|
227,119
|
5.93
|
4,730
|
196,218
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Manufactured
housing loans
|
Aug
2006
|
348,676
|
346,293
|
LIBOR+1.25
|
%
|
Aug
2011
|
7.03%
|
|
2.93
|
348,676
|
381,303
|
5.70
|
68,838
|
357,275
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
653,484
|
649,853
|
6.71%
|
|
2.08
|
555,060
|
728,297
|
5.00
|
75,308
|
553,493
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes
Payable
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
mortgage loans (4)
|
Nov
2004
|
109,922
|
109,922
|
LIBOR+0.16
|
%
|
Nov
2007
|
5.65%
|
|
0.57
|
109,922
|
124,991
|
2.79
|
121,882
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
109,922
|
109,922
|
5.65%
|
|
0.57
|
109,922
|
124,991
|
2.79
|
121,882
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
Agreements (4) (7)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities
|
Rolling
|
174,238
|
174,238
|
LIBOR+
0.54
|
%
|
Apr
2007
|
5.86%
|
|
0.08
|
174,238
|
137,113
|
3.76
|
103,789
|
45,800
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Real
estate related loans
|
Rolling
|
478,805
|
478,805
|
LIBOR+
0.75
|
%
|
Various
(8
|
)
|
6.07%
|
|
0.71
|
478,805
|
600,917
|
2.28
|
601,059
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
mortgage loans
|
Rolling
|
17,955
|
17,955
|
LIBOR+
0.43
|
%
|
Jun
2007
|
5.78%
|
|
0.25
|
17,955
|
19,177
|
2.81
|
18,667
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime
mortgage loans held for sale
|
Mar
2007
|
974,500
|
974,500
|
LIBOR+
0.60
|
%
|
Sep
2007
|
5.92%
|
|
0.50
|
974,500
|
1,018,080
|
2.54
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CBO
warehouse
|
Jan
2007
|
552,566
|
552,566
|
LIBOR+
0.51
|
%
|
Jan
2008
|
5.78%
|
|
0.81
|
552,566
|
651,042
|
3.38
|
499,365
|
124,872
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2,198,064
|
2,198,064
|
5.91%
|
|
0.59
|
2,198,064
|
2,426,329
|
2.78
|
1,222,880
|
170,672
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
Agreements subject to ABCP facility (10)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
RMBS
|
Rolling
|
1,312,209
|
1,312,209
|
5.38
|
%
|
Apr
2007
|
5.00%
|
|
0.08
|
1,312,209
|
1,354,942
|
4.33
|
-
|
1,242,369
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit
facility (5)
|
May
2006
|
125,500
|
125,500
|
LIBOR+
1.75
|
%
|
Nov
2007
|
7.07%
|
|
0.60
|
125,500
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Junior
subordinated notes payable
|
Mar
2006
|
100,100
|
100,100
|
7.80%
(6
|
)
|
Apr
2036
|
7.71%
|
|
29.00
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subtotal
debt obligations
|
8,807,234
|
8,778,151
|
5.81%
|
|
3.40
|
$
|
8,315,760
|
$
|
9,469,863
|
4.21
|
$
|
3,120,810
|
$
|
4,124,896
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing
on subprime mortgage
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
loans subject to call option (10)
|
Apr
2006
|
299,176
|
289,021
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
debt obligations
|
$
|
9,106,410
|
$
|
9,067,172
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)
Includes the effect of applicable hedges.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2)
Weighted average, including floating and fixed rate
classes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3)
See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below regarding the consolidation
of
ICH CMO.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4)
Subject to potential mandatory prepayments based on collateral
value.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5)
A maximum of $200 million can be drawn. In April 2007, the spread
was
reduced to 1.60% and the maturity was extended to June
2009.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6)
LIBOR + 2.25% after April 2016.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(7)
The counterparties on our repurchase agreements include: Bear
Stearns
Mortgage Capital Corporation ($1,308.7 million), Credit Suisse
($182.6
million), Deutsche Bank AG ($645.4 million) and other ($61.4
million).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(8)
Longest maturity is March 2008.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(9)
Financing terms are subject to change in July 2007.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(10)
See "Liquidity and Capital Resources"
below.
|
23
Our
debt
obligations existing at March 31, 2007 (gross of $39.2 million of discounts)
had
contractual maturities as follows (unaudited) (in thousands):
Period
from April 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007
|
$
|
2,899,777
|
||
2008
|
845,918
|
|||
2009
|
204,644
|
|||
2010
|
-
|
|||
2011
|
348,676
|
|||
2012
|
-
|
|||
Thereafter
|
4,807,395
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
9,106,410
|
Certain
of the debt obligations included above are obligations of our consolidated
subsidiaries which own the related collateral. In some cases, including the
CBO
and Other Bonds Payable, such collateral is not available to other creditors
of
ours.
Our
debt
obligations contain various customary loan covenants. Such covenants do not,
in
management’s opinion, materially restrict our investment strategy or ability to
raise capital. We are in compliance with all of our loan covenants as of March
31, 2007.
Two
classes of separately issued CBO bonds, with an aggregate $718.0 million face
amount, were issued subject to remarketing procedures and related agreements
whereby such bonds are remarketed and sold on a periodic basis. $395.0 million
of these bonds are fully insured by a third party with respect to the timely
payment of interest and principal thereon.
In
October 2003, pursuant to FIN No. 46R, we consolidated an entity which holds
a
portfolio of commercial mortgage loans which has been securitized. This
investment, which we refer to as ICH, was previously treated as a
non-consolidated residual interest in such securitization. The primary effect
of
the consolidation is the requirement that we reflect the gross loan assets
and
gross bonds payable of this entity in our financial statements.
In
March
2006, a consolidated subsidiary of ours acquired a portfolio of approximately
11,300 subprime mortgage loans (the “Subprime Portfolio”) for $1.50 billion. In
April 2006, Newcastle Mortgage Securities Trust 2006-1 (the “Securitization
Trust”) closed on a securitization of the Subprime Portfolio. We do not
consolidate the Securitization Trust. We sold the Subprime Portfolio to the
Securitization Trust. The Securitization Trust issued $1.45 billion of debt
(the
“Notes”). The Notes have a stated maturity of March 25, 2036. We, as holder of
the equity of the Securitization Trust, have the option to redeem the Notes
once
the aggregate principal balance of the Subprime Portfolio is equal to or less
than 20% of such balance at the date of the transfer. The transaction between
us
and the Securitization Trust qualified as a sale for accounting purposes.
However, 20% of the loans which are subject to call option by us were not
treated as being sold. Following the securitization, we held the following
interests in the Subprime Portfolio: (i) the equity of the Securitization Trust,
(ii) the retained notes, and (iii) subprime mortgage loans subject to call
option and related financing in the amount of 100% of such loans.
In
March
2006, we completed the placement of $100.0 million of trust preferred securities
through our wholly owned subsidiary, Newcastle Trust I (the “Preferred Trust”).
We own all of the common stock of the Preferred Trust. The Preferred Trust
used
the proceeds to purchase $100.1 million of our junior subordinated notes. These
notes represent all of the Preferred Trust’s assets. The terms of the junior
subordinated notes are substantially the same as the terms of the trust
preferred securities. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed at par
beginning in April 2011. We do not consolidate the Preferred Trust; as a result,
we have reflected the obligation to the Preferred Trust under the caption Junior
Subordinated Notes Payable.
In
December 2006, we closed a $2 billion asset backed commercial paper (ABCP)
facility through our wholly owned subsidiary, Windsor Funding Trust. This
facility provides us with the ability to finance our agency residential mortgage
backed securities (RMBS) and AAA-rated MBS by issuing secured liquidity notes
that are rated A-1+,
P-1
and F-1+, by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch respectively, and have
maturities of up to 250 days. The facility also permits the issuance of
subordinated notes rated at least BBB/Baa by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s or
Fitch. As of March 31, 2007, Windsor Funding Trust had approximately $1.3
billion of secured liquidity notes and $8.3 million of subordinated notes issued
and outstanding. The weighted average maturities of the secured liquidity notes
and the subordinated notes were 0.05 years and 4.75 years, respectively. We
own
all of the trust certificates of the Windsor Funding Trust. Windsor Funding
Trust used the proceeds of the issuance to enter into a repurchase agreement
with Newcastle to purchase interests in our agency RMBS. The repurchase
agreement represents Windsor Funding Trust’s only asset. The interest rate on
the repurchase agreement is effectively the weighted average interest rate
on
the secured liquidity notes and subordinated notes. Under the provisions of
FIN
46R, we determined that the noteholders were the primary beneficiaries of the
Windsor Funding Trust. As a result, we did not consolidate the Windsor Funding
Trust and have reflected our obligation pursuant to the asset backed commercial
paper facility under the caption Repurchase Agreements subject to ABCP
Facility.
In
January 2007, we entered into a $700 million non-recourse warehouse agreement
with a major investment bank to finance a portfolio of real estate related
loans
and securities prior to them being financed with a CBO. The financing primarily
bore interest at LIBOR + 0.50% and was terminated simultaneously with the
closing of the CBO financing in May 2007.
In
February 2007, we entered into a $400 million facility in the form of a
repurchase agreement with a major investment bank to finance our investments
in
real estate related loans from time to time. The repurchase agreement has a
rolling maturity of one
year,
with a maximum maturity of February 2010. The financing bears interest at LIBOR
plus an applicable spread, which varies depending on the type of
assets.
24
In
March
2007, we entered into an agreement to acquire a portfolio of subprime mortgage
loans for up to $1.70 billion. The amount of the final loan portfolio is subject
to the results of the due diligence review. At March 31, 2007, $1.0 billion
of
loans have been acquired. This acquisition was initially funded with an
approximately $974.5 million repurchase agreement. We have entered into an
interest rate swap in order to hedge our exposure to the risk of changes in
market interest rates with respect to the portfolio of loans.
In
May
2007, we completed our tenth CBO financing to term finance $825.0 million
portfolio of real estate related loans and securities. We issued, through a
consolidated subsidiary, $710.5 million of investment grade notes in the
offering. At closing, the investment grade notes have an initial weighted
average spread over LIBOR of 0.70% and a weighted average life of 7 years.
Approximately 82%, or $585.8 million, of the investment grade notes is rated
AAA
through AA- and sold to third parties. The remaining $124.7 million of
investment grade notes rated A+ through BBB- have been retained and financed.
We
also retained the below investment grade notes and preferred shares of the
offering.
In
April
2007, we entered into a facility, in the form of repurchase agreement, with
a
major investment bank to finance acquisitions of real estate related loans
from
time to time. The facility provides for the financing of assets of up of
to $400.0 million and bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable spread, which
varies depending on the type of assets being financed. The facility has a
rolling one year maturity.
Other
We
have
entered into total rate of return swaps with major investment banks to finance
certain loans whereby we receive the sum of all interest, fees and any positive
change in value amounts (the total return cash flows) from a reference asset
with a specified notional amount, and pay interest on such notional plus any
negative change in value amounts from such asset. These agreements are recorded
in Derivative Assets and treated as non-hedge derivatives for accounting
purposes and are therefore marked to market through income. Net interest
received is recorded to Interest Income and the mark to market is recorded
to
Other Income. If we owned the reference assets directly, they would not be
marked to market. Under the agreements, we are required to post an initial
margin deposit to an interest bearing account and additional margin may be
payable in the event of a decline in value of the reference asset. Any margin
on
deposit, less any negative change in value amounts, will be returned to us
upon
termination of the contract.
As
of
March 31, 2007, we held an aggregate of $418.9 million notional amount of total
rate of return swaps on 7 reference assets on which we had deposited $66.1
million of margin. These total rate of return swaps had an aggregate fair value
of approximately $1.3 million, a weighted average receive interest rate of
LIBOR
+ 2.24%, a weighted average pay interest rate of LIBOR + 0.65%, and a weighted
average maturity of 1.05 years.
Stockholders’
Equity
Common
Stock
The
following table presents information on shares of our common stock issued since
December 31, 2006:
Period
|
Shares
Issued
|
Range
of Issue Prices
(1)
|
Net
Proceeds (millions)
|
Options
Granted
to
Manager
|
||
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007
April
2007
|
2,495,882
4,560,000
|
$31.30
$27.75
|
$
76.3
$124.9
|
242,000
456,000
|
(1)
Excludes prices of shares issued pursuant to the exercise of options and of
shares issued to our independent directors.
At
March
31, 2007, we had 48,209,699 shares of common stock outstanding.
As
of
March 31, 2007, our outstanding options were summarized as follows:
Held
by the Manager
|
1,138,005
|
|||
Issued
to the Manager and subsequently transferred to certain of the
Manager's
employees
|
897,920
|
|||
Held
by the independent directors
|
14,000
|
|||
Total
|
2,049,925
|
In
connection with this offering in April 2007, for the purpose of compensating
the
Manager for its successful efforts in raising capital for us, we granted options
to the Manger to purchase 456,000 shares of our common stock at the public
offering price, which were valued at approximately $1.2 million.
Preferred
Stock
25
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, our accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) changed due to the following factors (in thousands):
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income, December, 31, 2006
|
$
|
75,984
|
||
Net
unrealized gain
(loss) on securities
|
(65,513
|
)
|
||
Reclassification
of
net realized (gain) loss on securities into earnings
|
(7,759
|
)
|
||
Foreign
currency
translation
|
189
|
|||
Net
unrealized gain
(loss) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
(15,195
|
)
|
||
Reclassification
of
net realized (gain) loss on derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges
into earnings
|
331
|
|||
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss), March 31, 2007
|
$
|
(11,963
|
)
|
|
Our
book
equity changes as our real estate securities portfolio and derivatives are
marked-to-market each quarter, among other factors. The primary causes of
mark-to-market changes are changes in interest rates and credit spreads. During
the period, declining interest rates and widening credit spreads resulted in
a
net decrease in unrealized gains on our real estate securities and derivatives.
In an environment of widening credit spreads and increasing interest rates,
we
believe our new investment activities would benefit. While such an environment
would likely result in a decrease in the fair value of our existing securities
portfolio and, therefore, reduce our book equity and ability to realize gains
on
such existing securities, it would not directly affect our earnings or our
cash
flow or our ability to pay dividends.
Common
Dividends Paid
Declared
for
the
Period Ended
|
Paid
|
Amount
Per
Share
|
||
September
30, 2006
|
October
2006
|
$0.650
|
||
December
31, 2006
|
January
2007
|
$0.690
|
||
March
31, 2007
|
April
2007
|
$0.690
|
Cash
Flow
Net
cash
flow used
in
operating activities decreased to ($1,001.7 million) for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 from ($1,470.4 million) for the three months ended March 31,
2006. This change primarily resulted from the acquisition and settlement of
our
investments as described above, and the performance thereof. The three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 included the purchase of loans held
for
sale of $1,009.8 million and $1,511.1 million, respectively.
Investing
activities used ($649.7 million) and ($135.7 million) during the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Investing activities consisted
primarily of investments made in certain real estate securities, loans and
other
real estate related assets, net of proceeds from the sale or settlement of
investments.
Financing
activities provided $1,649.9 million and $1,623.3 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The equity issuances,
borrowings and debt issuances described above served as the primary sources
of
cash flow from financing activities. Offsetting uses included the payment of
related deferred financing costs, the purchase of hedging instruments, the
payment of dividends, and the repayment of debt as described above.
See
the
consolidated statements of cash flows included in our consolidated financial
statements included herein for a reconciliation of our cash position for the
periods described herein.
INTEREST
RATE, CREDIT AND SPREAD RISK
We
are
subject to interest rate, credit and spread risk with respect to our
investments.
Our
primary interest rate exposures relate to our real estate securities, loans,
floating rate debt obligations, interest rate swaps, and interest rate caps.
Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest
income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on
interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with
our
interest-bearing liabilities and hedges. Changes in the level of interest rates
also can affect, among other things, our ability to acquire real estate
securities and loans at attractive prices, the value of our real estate
securities, loans and derivatives, and our ability to realize gains from the
sale of such assets.
26
Our
general financing strategy focuses on the use of match funded structures. This
means that we seek to match the maturities of our debt obligations with the
maturities of our investments to minimize the risk that we have to refinance
our
liabilities prior to the maturities of our assets, and to reduce the impact
of
changing interest rates on our earnings. In addition, we generally match fund
interest rates on our investments with like-kind debt (i.e., fixed rate assets
are financed with fixed rate debt and floating rate assets are financed with
floating rate debt), directly or through the use of interest rate swaps, caps
or
other financial instruments, or through a combination of these strategies,
which
allows us to reduce the impact of changing interest rates on our earnings.
See
“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Interest Rate
Exposure” below.
Real
Estate Securities
Interest
rate changes may also impact our net book value as our real estate securities
and related hedge derivatives are marked to market each quarter. Our loan
investments and debt obligations are not marked to market. Generally, as
interest rates increase, the value of our fixed rate securities decreases,
and
as interest rates decrease, the value of such securities will increase. In
general, we would expect that over time, decreases in the value of our real
estate securities portfolio attributable to interest rate changes will be offset
to some degree by increases in the value of our swaps, and vice versa. However,
the relationship between spreads on securities and spreads on swaps may vary
from time to time, resulting in a net aggregate book value increase or decline.
Our real estate securities portfolio is largely financed to maturity through
long term CBO financings that are not redeemable as a result of book value
changes. Accordingly, unless there is a material impairment in value that would
result in a payment not being received on a security, changes in the book value
of our securities portfolio will not directly affect our recurring earnings
or
our ability to pay dividends.
The
commercial mortgage and asset backed securities we invest in are generally
junior in right of payment of interest and principal to one or more senior
classes, but benefit from the support of one or more subordinate classes of
securities or other form of credit support within a securitization transaction.
The senior unsecured REIT debt securities we invest in reflect comparable credit
risk. Credit risk refers to each individual borrower’s ability to make required
interest and principal payments on the scheduled due dates. We believe, based
on
our due diligence process, that these securities offer attractive risk-adjusted
returns with long term principal protection under a variety of default and
loss
scenarios. While the expected yield on these securities is sensitive to the
performance of the underlying assets, the more subordinated securities or other
features of the securitization transaction, in the case of commercial mortgage
and asset backed securities, and the issuer's underlying equity and subordinated
debt, in the case of senior unsecured REIT debt securities, are designed to
bear
the first risk of default and loss. We further minimize credit risk by actively
monitoring our real estate securities portfolio and the underlying credit
quality of our holdings and, where appropriate, repositioning our investments
to
upgrade the credit quality on our investments. While we have not experienced
any
significant credit losses, in the event of a significant rising interest rate
environment and/or economic downturn, loan and collateral defaults may increase
and result in credit losses that would adversely affect our liquidity and
operating results.
Our
real
estate securities are also subject to spread risk. Our fixed rate securities
are
valued based on a market credit spread over the rate payable on fixed rate
U.S.
Treasuries of like maturity. In other words, their value is dependent on the
yield demanded on such securities by the market based on their credit relative
to U.S. Treasuries. Excessive supply of such securities combined with reduced
demand will generally cause the market to require a higher yield on such
securities, resulting in the use of a higher (or “wider”) spread over the
benchmark rate (usually the applicable U.S. Treasury security yield) to value
such securities. Under such conditions, the value of our real estate securities
portfolio would tend to decline. Conversely, if the spread used to value such
securities were to decrease (or “tighten”), the value of our real estate
securities portfolio would tend to increase. Our floating rate securities are
valued based on a market credit spread over LIBOR and are affected similarly
by
changes in LIBOR spreads. Such changes in the market value of our real estate
securities portfolio may affect our net equity, net income or cash flow directly
through their impact on unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities, and therefore our ability to realize gains on such securities,
or
indirectly through their impact on our ability to borrow and access capital.
If
the value of our securities subject to repurchase agreements were to decline,
it
could affect our ability to refinance such securities upon the maturity of
the
related repurchase agreements, adversely impacting our rate of return on such
securities. See “ Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk -
Credit Spread Exposure” below.
Furthermore,
shifts in the U.S. Treasury yield curve, which represents the market’s
expectations of future interest rates, would also affect the yield required
on
our real estate securities and therefore their value. This would have similar
effects on our real estate securities portfolio and our financial position
and
operations to a change in spreads.
Loans
Similar
to our real estate securities portfolio, we are subject to credit and spread
risk with respect to our real estate related, commercial mortgage and
residential mortgage loan portfolios. However, unlike our real estate securities
portfolio, our residential mortgage loans generally do not benefit from the
support of junior classes of securities. We believe that this credit risk is
mitigated through our due diligence process and continual reviews of the
borrower’s payment history, delinquency status, and the relationship of the loan
balance to the underlying property value.
Our
loan
portfolios are also subject to spread risk. Our floating rate loans are valued
based on a market credit spread to LIBOR. The value of the loans is dependent
upon the yield demanded by the market based on their credit relative to LIBOR.
The value of our floating rate loans would tend to decline should the market
require a higher yield on such loans, resulting in the use of a higher spread
over the benchmark rate (usually the applicable LIBOR yield). Our fixed rate
loans are valued based on
a
market credit spread over U.S. Treasuries and are effected similarly by changes
in U.S. Treasury spreads. If the value of our loans subject to repurchase
agreements were to decline, it could affect our ability to refinance such
loans
upon the maturity of the related repurchase agreements.
27
Any
credit or spread losses incurred with respect to our loan portfolios would
affect us in the same way as similar losses on our real estate securities
portfolio as described above, except that our loan portfolios are not marked
to
market. Accordingly, unless there is a material impairment in value that would
result in a payment not being received on a loan, changes in the value of our
loan portfolio will not directly affect our recurring earnings or ability to
pay
dividends.
Statistics
March
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
||||||||||||
Face
Amount
|
%
Total
|
Face
Amount
|
%
Total
|
||||||||||
Real
Estate Securities and Related Loans
|
$
|
6,782,018
|
65.2%
|
|
$
|
6,196,179
|
71.7%
|
|
|||||
Agency
RMBS
|
1,348,562
|
13.0%
|
|
1,177,779
|
13.6%
|
|
|||||||
Total
Real Estate
Securities and Related Loans
|
8,130,580
|
78.2%
|
|
7,373,958
|
85.3%
|
|
|||||||
Residential
Mortgage Loans
|
758,474
|
7.3%
|
|
812,561
|
9.4%
|
|
|||||||
Subprime
Loans Held for Sale
|
1,049,285
|
10.1%
|
|
-
|
0.0%
|
|
|||||||
Other
|
.
|
||||||||||||
Subprime
Loans
Subject to Call Option
|
299,176
|
2.8%
|
|
299,176
|
3.5%
|
|
|||||||
Investment
in Real
Estate Joint Venture
|
38,561
|
0.4%
|
|
38,469
|
0.4%
|
|
|||||||
ICH
Loans
|
121,649
|
1.2%
|
|
123,390
|
1.4%
|
|
|||||||
Total
Portfolio
|
$
|
10,397,725
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
8,647,554
|
100.0%
|
|
The
table
excludes operating real estate of $34.2 million at March 31, 2007 and $33.8
million at December 31, 2006.
Asset
Quality and Diversification at March 31, 2007
· |
Total
real estate securities and related loans of $8.1 billion face amount,
representing 78.2% of the total portfolio.
|
Asset
Quality
o |
$6.8
billion or 84.0% of this portfolio is rated by third parties, or
had an
implied AAA rating, with a weighted average rating of
BBB.
|
o |
$4.7
billion or 58.1% of this portfolio has an investment grade rating
(BBB- or
higher) or an implied AAA rating.
|
o |
For
the core real estate securities and related loans (excluding subprime
residual) of $6.8 billion, the weighted average credit spread (i.e.,
the
yield premium on our investments over the comparable US Treasury
or LIBOR)
was 2.81% at March 31, 2007 versus 2.56% at December 31,
2006.
|
Diversity
o |
Our
$6.8 billion portfolio of real estate securities and loans are diversified
by asset type, industry, location and issuer.
|
o |
This
portfolio had 601 investments. The largest investment was $320.8
million
and the average investment size was $11.3
million.
|
o |
Our
real estate securities are supported by pools of underlying loans.
For
instance, our CMBS investments had over 21,000 underlying
loans.
|
· |
Residential
mortgage loans of $758.5 million face amount, representing 7.3% of
the
total portfolio.
|
Asset
Quality
o |
These
residential loans are to high quality borrowers with an average Fair
Isaac
Corp. credit score (“FICO”) of 696.
|
o |
Approximately
$121.9 million face amount were held in securitized form, of which
95.5%
was rated investment grade.
|
Diversity
o |
Our
residential and manufactured housing loans were well diversified
with 423
and 17,660 loans, respectively.
|
· |
Subprime
loans held for sale of $1.0 billion face amount, representing 10.1%
of the
total portfolio.
|
o |
Approximately
96% of the portfolio is secured by first liens and 93% are owner
occupied.
|
o |
Our
subprime loans held for sale were well diversified with 4,402
loans.
|
Margin
Certain
of our investments are financed through repurchase agreements or total rate
of
return swaps which are subject to margin calls based on the value of such
investments. Margin calls resulting from decreases in value related to rising
interest rates are substantially offset by our ability to make margin calls
on
our interest rate derivatives. We maintain adequate cash reserves or
availability on our credit facility to meet any margin calls resulting from
decreases in value related to a reasonably possible (in the opinion of
management) widening of credit spreads. Funding a margin call on our credit
facility would have a dilutive effect on our earnings, however we would not
expect this to be material.
28
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As
of
March 31, 2007, we had one material off-balance sheet arrangement.
· |
In
April 2006, we securitized our portfolio of subprime mortgage loans.
The
loans were sold to a securitization trust, of which 80% were treated
as a
sale, which is an off-balance sheet financing as described in “Liquidity
and Capital Resources.”
|
We
also
had the following arrangements which do not meet the definition of off-balance
sheet arrangements, but do have some of the characteristics of off-balance
sheet
arrangements.
· |
We
are party to total rate of return swaps which are treated as non-hedge
derivatives. For further information on these investments, see “Liquidity
and Capital Resources.”
|
· |
We
have made investments in four unconsolidated
subsidiaries.
|
In
each
case, our exposure to loss is limited to the carrying (fair) value of our
investment, except for the total rate of return swaps where our exposure to
loss
is limited to their fair value plus their notional amount.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
During
the first three months of 2007, we had all of the material contractual
obligations referred to in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006, as well as the following:
Contract
Category
|
Change
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
We
financed certain newly acquired loans and securities with repurchase
agreements. We entered into the interim financing for our subprime
mortgage loans. We entered into a repurchase agreement with a
rolling maturity of one year. We also entered into a warehouse agreement
(structured in the form of a repurchase agreement) related to our
tenth
CBO financing.
|
Interest
rate swaps
|
Certain
floating rate debt issuances as well as certain assets were hedged
with
interest rate swaps.
|
Purchase
commitment
|
We
entered into an agreement to purchase a portfolio of subprime mortgage
loans.
|
Loan
servicing agreement
|
We
entered into an agreement related to our second subprime mortgage
loan
portfolio.
|
The
terms
of these contracts are described under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk” below.
INFLATION
We
believe that our risk of increases in the market interest rates on our floating
rate debt as a result of inflation is largely offset by our use of match funding
and hedging instruments as described above. See "Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure About Market Risk -- Interest Rate Exposure" below.
29
FUNDS
FROM OPERATIONS
We
believe FFO is one appropriate measure of the operating performance of real
estate companies. We also believe that FFO is an appropriate supplemental
disclosure of operating performance for a REIT due to its widespread acceptance
and use within the REIT and analyst communities.
Furthermore, FFO is used to compute our incentive compensation to the Manager.
FFO, for our purposes, represents net income available for common stockholders
(computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding extraordinary items, plus
depreciation of operating real estate, and after adjustments for unconsolidated
subsidiaries, if any. We consider gains and losses on resolution of our
investments to be a normal part of our recurring operations and therefore do
not
exclude such gains and losses when arriving at FFO. Adjustments for
unconsolidated subsidiaries, if any, are calculated to reflect FFO on the same
basis. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in
accordance with GAAP and therefore should not be considered an alternative
to
net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative
to
cash flow as a measure of liquidity and is not necessarily indicative of cash
available to fund cash needs. Our calculation of FFO may be different from
the
calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be
limited.
Funds
from Operations (FFO) is calculated as follows (unaudited) (in
thousands):
|
For
the Three
Months
Ended
March
31, 2007
|
||||
Income
available for common stockholders
|
$
|
33,676
|
||
Operating
real estate depreciation
|
256
|
|||
Funds
from Operations (FFO)
|
$
|
33,932
|
||
Funds
from Operations was derived from our segments as follows (unaudited)
(in
thousands):
|
Book
Equity at
March
31, 2007
|
Average
Invested
Common
Equity
for
the Three
Months
Ended
March
31, 2007(2)
|
FFO
for the
Three
Months
Ended
March
31, 2007
|
Return
on
Invested
Common
Equity
(ROE)
(3)
|
||||||||||
Real
estate securities and real estate related loans
|
$
|
1,128,075
|
$
|
1,043,594
|
$
|
41,734
|
16.00%
|
|
|||||
Residential
mortgage loans
|
146,632
|
125,216
|
6,472
|
20.67%
|
|
||||||||
Operating
real estate
|
49,311
|
49,340
|
761
|
6.17%
|
|
||||||||
Unallocated
(1)
|
(421,118
|
)
|
(328,286
|
)
|
(15,035
|
)
|
N/A
|
||||||
Total
(2)
|
902,900
|
$
|
889,864
|
$
|
33,932
|
15.25%
|
|
||||||
Preferred
stock
|
152,500
|
||||||||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(4,487
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
(11,963
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
book equity
|
$
|
1,038,950
|
|||||||||||
(1) |
Unallocated
FFO represents ($2,515) of preferred dividends, ($3,671) of interest
on
our credit facility and junior subordinated notes payable, and ($8,849)
of
corporate general and administrative expenses, management fees and
incentive compensation for the three months ended March 31,
2007.
|
(2) |
Invested
common equity is equal to book equity excluding preferred stock,
accumulated depreciation and accumulated other comprehensive income.
|
(3) |
FFO
divided by average invested common equity,
annualized.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In
March
2007, we entered into a servicing agreement with a portfolio company of a
private equity fund advised by an affiliate of our Manager for them to service
a
portfolio of subprime mortgage loans, which was acquired at the same time.
As
compensation under the servicing agreement, the portfolio company will receive,
on a monthly basis, a net servicing fee equal to 0.5% per annum on the annual
principal balance of the loans being serviced. The outstanding unpaid principal
balance of this portfolio was approximately $1.0 billion at March 31,
2007.
As
of
March 31, 2007, we held total investments of $255.0 million face amount of
real
estate securities and related loans issued by affiliates of our manager and
earned approximately $4.0 million of interest on such investments for the three
months ended March 31, 2007.
30
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market
risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, credit
spreads, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices.
The primary market risks that we are exposed to are interest rate risk and
credit spread risk. These risks are highly sensitive to many factors, including
governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic
and
political considerations and other factors beyond our control. All of our market
risk sensitive assets, liabilities and related derivative positions are for
non-trading purposes only. For a further understanding of how market risk may
affect our financial position or operating results, please refer to
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations − Application of Critical Accounting Policies.”
Interest
Rate Exposure
Our
primary interest rate exposures relate to our real estate securities, loans,
floating rate debt obligations, interest rate swaps, and interest rate caps.
Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest
income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on
interest-earning assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with
our
interest-bearing liabilities and hedges. Changes in the level of interest rates
also can affect, among other things, our ability to acquire real estate
securities and loans at attractive prices, the value of our real estate
securities, loans and derivatives, and our ability to realize gains from the
sale of such assets. While our strategy is to utilize interest rate swaps,
caps
and match funded financings in order to limit the effects of changes in interest
rates on our operations, there can be no assurance that our profitability will
not be adversely affected during any period as a result of changing interest
rates. In the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or
economic downturn, loan and collateral defaults may increase and result in
credit losses that would adversely affect our liquidity and operating results.
As of March 31, 2007, a 100 basis point increase in short term interest rates
would increase our earnings, excluding the subprime mortgage loans held for
sale, by approximately $0.6 million per annum.
A
period
of rising interest rates negatively impacts our return on certain investments,
particularly our floating rate residential mortgage loans. Although these loans
are financed with floating rate debt, the interest rate on the debt resets
prior
to, and in some cases more frequently than, the interest rate on the assets,
causing a decrease in return on equity during a period of rising interest rates.
When interest rates stabilize, we expect these investments will return to their
historical returns on equity.
Interest
rate changes may also impact our net book value as our real estate securities
and related hedge derivatives are marked to market each quarter. Our loan
investments and debt obligations are not marked to market. Generally, as
interest rates increase, the value of our fixed rate securities decreases,
and
as interest rates decrease, the value of such securities will increase. In
general, we would expect that over time, decreases in the value of our real
estate securities portfolio attributable to interest rate changes will be offset
to some degree by increases in the value of our swaps, and vice versa. However,
the relationship between spreads on securities and spreads on swaps may vary
from time to time, resulting in a net aggregate book value increase or decline.
Our real estate securities portfolio is largely financed to maturity through
long-term CBO financings that are not redeemable as a result of book value
changes. Accordingly, unless there is a material impairment in value that would
result in a payment not being received on a security, changes in the book value
of our portfolio will not directly affect our recurring earnings or our ability
to pay dividends. As of March 31, 2007, a 100 basis point change in short term
interest rates would impact our net book value by approximately $26.2
million.
Our
general financing strategy focuses on the use of match funded structures. This
means that, when appropriate, we seek to match the maturities of our debt
obligations with the maturities of our investments to minimize the risk that
we
have to refinance our liabilities prior to the maturities of our assets, and
to
reduce the impact of changing interest rates on our earnings. In addition,
we
generally match fund interest rates on our investments with like-kind debt
(i.e., fixed rate assets are financed with fixed rate debt and floating rate
assets are financed with floating rate debt), directly or through the use of
interest rate swaps, caps, or other financial instruments, or through a
combination of these strategies, which allows us to reduce the impact of
changing interest rates on our earnings. Our financing strategy is dependent
on
our ability to place the match funded debt we use to finance our investments
at
rates that provide a positive net spread. If spreads for such liabilities widen
or if demand for such liabilities ceases to exist, then our ability to execute
future financings will be severely restricted.
Interest
rate swaps are agreements in which a series of interest rate flows are exchanged
with a third party (counterparty) over a prescribed period. The notional amount
on which swaps are based is not exchanged. In general, our swaps are “pay fixed”
swaps involving the exchange of floating rate interest payments from the
counterparty for fixed interest payments from us. This can effectively convert
a
floating rate debt obligation into a fixed rate debt obligation.
Similarly,
an interest rate cap or floor agreement is a contract in which we purchase
a cap
or floor contract on a notional face amount. We will make an up-front payment
to
the counterparty for which the counterparty agrees to make future payments
to us
should the reference rate (typically one- or three-month LIBOR) rise above
(cap
agreements) or fall below (floor agreements) the “strike” rate specified in the
contract. Should the reference rate rise above the contractual strike rate
in a
cap, we will earn cap income; should the reference rate fall below the
contractual strike rate in a floor, we will earn floor income. Payments on
an
annualized basis will equal the contractual notional face amount multiplied
by
the difference between the actual reference rate and the contracted strike
rate.
31
While
a
REIT may utilize these types of derivative instruments to hedge interest rate
risk on its liabilities or for other purposes, such derivative instruments
could
generate income that is not qualified income for purposes of maintaining REIT
status. As a consequence, we may only engage in such instruments to hedge such
risks within the constraints of maintaining our standing as a REIT. We do not
enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes nor as a hedge against
changes in credit risk.
Our
hedging transactions using derivative instruments also involve certain
additional risks such as counterparty credit risk, the enforceability of hedging
contracts and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest
rates will cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. The counterparties
to our derivative arrangements are major financial institutions with high credit
ratings with which we and our affiliates may also have other financial
relationships. As a result, we do not anticipate that any of these
counterparties will fail to meet their obligations. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to adequately protect against the foregoing risks and
will
ultimately realize an economic benefit that exceeds the related amounts incurred
in connection with engaging in such hedging strategies.
Credit
Spread Exposure
Our
real
estate securities are also subject to spread risk. Our fixed rate securities
are
valued based on a market credit spread over the rate payable on fixed rate
U.S.
Treasuries of like maturity. In other words, their value is dependent on the
yield demanded on such securities by the market based on their credit relative
to U.S. Treasuries. Excessive supply of such securities combined with reduced
demand will generally cause the market to require a higher yield on such
securities, resulting in the use of higher (or “wider”) spread over the
benchmark rate (usually the applicable U.S. Treasury security yield) to value
such securities. Under such conditions, the value of our real estate securities
portfolio would tend to decline. Conversely, if the spread used to value such
securities were to decrease (or “tighten”), the value of our real estate
securities portfolio would tend to increase. Our floating rate securities are
valued based on a market credit spread over LIBOR and are affected similarly
by
changes in LIBOR spreads. Such changes in the market value of our real estate
securities portfolio may affect our net equity, net income or cash flow directly
through their impact on unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities, and therefore our ability to realize gains on such securities,
or
indirectly through their impact on our ability to borrow and access
capital.
Furthermore,
shifts in the U.S. Treasury yield curve, which represents the market’s
expectations of future interest rates, would also effect the yield required
on
our real estate securities and therefore their value. This would have similar
effects on our real estate securities portfolio and our financial position
and
operations to a change in spreads.
Our
loan
portfolios are also subject to spread risk. Our floating rate loans are valued
based on a market credit spread to LIBOR. The value of the loans is dependent
upon the yield demanded by the market based on their credit relative to LIBOR.
The value of our floating rate loans would tend to decline should the market
require a higher yield on such loans, resulting in the use of a higher spread
over the benchmark rate (usually the applicable LIBOR yield). Our fixed rate
loans are valued based on a market credit spread over U.S. Treasuries and are
effected similarly by changes in U.S. Treasury spreads. If the value of our
loans subject to repurchase agreements or commercial paper were to decline,
it
could affect our ability to refinance such loans upon the maturity of the
related repurchase agreements or commercial paper.
Any
decreases in the value of our loan portfolios due to spread changes would affect
us in the same way as similar changes to our real estate securities portfolio
as
described above, except that our loan portfolios are not marked to
market.
As
of
March 31, 2007, a 25 basis point movement in credit spreads would impact our
net
book value by approximately $50.7 million, but would not directly affect our
earnings or cash flow.
Margin
Certain
of our investments are financed through repurchase agreements or total return
swaps which are subject to margin calls based on the value of such investments.
Margin calls resulting from decreases in value related to rising interest rates
are substantially offset by our ability to make margin calls on our interest
rate derivatives. We maintain adequate cash reserves or availability on our
credit facility to meet any margin calls resulting from decreases in value
related to a reasonably possible (in the opinion of management) widening of
credit spreads. Funding a margin call on our credit facility would have a
dilutive effect on our earnings, however we would not expect this to be
material.
32
Fair
Values
Fair
values for a majority of our investments are readily obtainable through broker
quotations. For certain of our financial instruments, fair values are not
readily available since there are no active trading markets as characterized
by
current exchanges between willing parties. Accordingly, fair values can only
be
derived or estimated for these instruments using various valuation techniques,
such as computing the present value of estimated future cash flows using
discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. However, the determination
of estimated future cash flows is inherently subjective and imprecise. We note
that minor changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a
material effect on these derived or estimated fair values, and that the fair
values reflected below are indicative of the interest rate and credit spread
environments as of March 31, 2007 and do not take into consideration the effects
of subsequent interest rate or credit spread fluctuations.
We
note
that the values of our investments in real estate securities, loans and
derivative instruments, primarily interest rate hedges on our debt obligations,
are sensitive to changes in market interest rates, credit spreads and other
market factors. The value of these investments can vary, and has varied,
materially from period to period.
Interest
Rate and Credit Spread Risk
We
held
the following interest rate and credit spread risk sensitive instruments at
March 31, 2007 (unaudited) (dollars in thousands):
Carrying
Value
|
Principal
Balance
or
Notional
Amount
|
Weighted Average
Yield/Funding Cost
|
Maturity
Date
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Real
estate securities, available for sale (1)
|
$
|
5,581,179
|
$
|
5,667,330
|
6.53%
|
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
5,581,179
|
||||||
Real
estate related loans (2)
|
2,138,974
|
2,146,372
|
8.85%
|
|
(2)
|
|
2,141,541
|
|||||||||
Residential
mortgage loans (3)
|
752,590
|
758,473
|
8.14%
|
|
(3)
|
|
772,230
|
|||||||||
Subprime
mortgage loans, held for sale (3)
|
1,018,080
|
1,049,285
|
7.82%
|
|
(3)
|
|
1,018,080
|
|||||||||
Subprime
mortgage loans subject to call option (4)
|
289,021
|
299,176
|
(4)
|
|
(4)
|
|
298,021
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate caps, treated as hedges (5)
|
903
|
316,926
|
N/A
|
(5)
|
|
903
|
||||||||||
Total
rate of return swaps (6)
|
1,273
|
418,878
|
N/A
|
(6)
|
|
1,273
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
CBO
bonds payable (7)
|
4,282,503
|
4,307,955
|
5.79%
|
|
(7)
|
|
4,312,803
|
|||||||||
Other
bonds payable (8)
|
649,853
|
653,484
|
6.71%
|
|
(8)
|
|
650,292
|
|||||||||
Notes
payable (9)
|
109,922
|
109,922
|
5.65%
|
|
(9)
|
|
109,922
|
|||||||||
Repurchase
agreements (10)
|
2,198,064
|
2,198,064
|
5.91%
|
|
(10)
|
|
2,198,064
|
|||||||||
Repurchase
agreements subject to ABCP facility (10)
|
1,312,209
|
1,312,209
|
5.00%
|
|
(10)
|
|
1,312,209
|
|||||||||
Financing
of subprime mortgage loans
|
|
|||||||||||||||
subject
to call
option (4)
|
289,021
|
299,176
|
(4)
|
|
(4)
|
|
289,021
|
|||||||||
Credit
facility (11)
|
125,500
|
125,500
|
7.07%
|
|
(11)
|
|
125,715
|
|||||||||
Junior
subordinated notes payable (12)
|
100,100
|
100,100
|
7.71%
|
|
(12)
|
|
101,294
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps, treated as hedges (13)
|
(26,831
|
)
|
4,864,785
|
N/A
|
(13)
|
|
(26,831
|
)
|
||||||||
Non-hedge
derivatives (14)
|
702
|
977,784
|
N/A
|
(14)
|
|
702
|
(1)
|
These
securities contain various terms, including fixed and floating
rates,
self-amortizing and interest only. Their weighted average maturity
is 4.86
years. The fair value of these securities is estimated by obtaining
third
party broker quotations, if available and practicable, and counterparty
quotations.
|
(2)
|
Represents
the following loans:
|
Loan
Type
|
Current
Face
Amount
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
Weighted
Avg.
Yield
|
|
Weighted
Average
Maturity
(Years)
|
|
Floating
Rate
Loans
as a % of
Face
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||
B-Notes
|
$
|
345,960
|
$
|
344,613
|
8.20%
|
|
2.66
|
80.7%
|
|
$
|
344,613
|
||||||||
Mezzanine
Loans
|
1,223,656
|
1,219,082
|
9.25%
|
|
2.77
|
92.0%
|
|
1,219,942
|
|||||||||||
Bank
Loans
|
347,226
|
347,056
|
8.06%
|
|
4.40
|
100.0%
|
|
348,763
|
|||||||||||
Whole
Loans
|
107,881
|
108,348
|
10.30%
|
|
1.98
|
100.0%
|
|
108,348
|
|||||||||||
ICH
Loans
|
121,649
|
119,875
|
7.63%
|
|
0.89
|
1.4%
|
|
119,875
|
|||||||||||
$
|
2,146,372
|
$
|
2,138,974
|
8.85%
|
|
2.87
|
86.7%
|
|
$
|
2,141,541
|
|||||||||
33
The ICH loans were valued by discounting expected future cash flows by the loans’ effective rate at acquisition. The rest of the loans were valued by obtaining third party broker quotations, if available and practicable, and counterparty quotations.
(3)
|
This
aggregate portfolio of residential loans consists of a portfolio
of
floating rate residential mortgage loans and two portfolios of
substantially fixed rate manufactured housing loans. The $140.5 million
portfolio of residential mortgage loans has a weighted average maturity
of
2.79 years. The $617.9 million manufactured housing loan portfolios
have a
weighted average maturity of 5.79 years. The $1,049.3 million portfolio
of
subprime mortgage loans has a weighted average maturity of 2.54 years.
These loans were valued by reference to current market interest rates
and
credit spreads.
|
(4)
|
These
two items, related to the securitization of subprime mortgage loans,
are
equal and offsetting. They each yield 9.24% and are further described
under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital
Resources”.
|
(5)
|
Represents
cap agreements as follows:
|
|
|
Notional
Balance
|
|
|
Effective
Date
|
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
|
Capped
Rate
|
|
|
Strike
Rate
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
$
|
237,307
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
March
2009
|
|
|
1-Month
LIBOR
|
|
|
6.50%
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
January
2010
|
|
|
October
2015
|
|
|
3-Month
LIBOR
|
|
|
8.00%
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
8,619
|
|
|
December
2010
|
|
|
June
2015
|
|
|
3-Month
LIBOR
|
|
|
7.00%
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
May
2011
|
|
|
September
2015
|
|
|
1-Month
LIBOR
|
|
|
7.50%
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
316,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
fair
value of these agreements is estimated by obtaining counterparty
quotations.
(6)
|
Represents
total rate of return swaps which are treated as non-hedge derivatives.
The
fair value of these agreements, which is included in Derivative
Assets, is
estimated by obtaining counterparty quotations. See “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations -
Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a further discussion of these
swaps.
|
(7)
|
These
bonds were valued by discounting expected future cash flows
by a rate
calculated based on current market conditions for comparable
financial
instruments, including market interest rates and credit
spreads. The
weighted average maturity of the CBO bonds payable is 5.60
years. The CBO
bonds payable amortize principal prior to maturity based
on collateral
receipts, subject to reinvestment
requirements.
|
(8)
|
The
ICH bonds amortize principal prior to maturity based on
collateral
receipts and have a weighted average maturity of 0.85 years.
These bonds
were valued by discounting expected future cash flows by
a rate calculated
based on current market conditions for comparable financial
instruments,
including market interest rates and credit spreads. The
manufactured
housing loan bonds amortize principal prior to maturity
based on
collateral receipts and have a weighted average maturity
of 2.30. These
bonds were valued by reference to current market interest
rates and credit
spreads.
|
(9)
|
The
residential mortgage loan financing has a weighted average
maturity of
0.57 years and is subject to adjustment monthly based on
the market value
of the loan portfolio. This financing was valued by reference
to current
market interest rates and credit
spreads.
|
(10)
|
These
agreements bear floating rates of interest, which reset monthly
or
quarterly to a market credit spread, and we believe that,
for similar
financial instruments with comparable credit risks, the effective
rates
approximate market rates. Accordingly, the carrying amounts
outstanding
are believed to approximate fair value. These agreements
have a weighted
average maturity of 0.59 years.
|
(11)
|
The
credit facility has a weighted average maturity of 0.60 years. This
facility was valued at the reduced credit spread obtained
in the revised
financing terms agreed with the lender in April
2007.
|
(12)
|
These
notes have a weighted average maturity of 29.0
years. These notes were
valued by discounting expected future cash flows
by a rate calculated
based on current market conditions for comparable
financial instruments,
including market interest rates and credit
spreads.
|
34
(13)
|
Represents
current swap agreements as follows:
|
Year
of Maturity
|
|
Weighted
Average
Maturity
|
Aggregate
Notional
Amount
|
|
Weighted
Average
Fixed
Pay Rate
|
Aggregate
Fair
Value
|
||||
Agreements
which receive 1-Month LIBOR:
|
||||||||||
2009
|
May
2009
|
309,437
|
*
|
3.27%
|
(7,677)
|
|||||
2010
|
Jun
2010
|
380,690
|
4.37%
|
(4,507)
|
||||||
2011
|
Jul
2011
|
631,072
|
5.22%
|
4,506
|
||||||
2012
|
Feb
2012
|
268,693
|
4.99%
|
261
|
||||||
2015
|
Jul
2015
|
776,901
|
4.92%
|
(4,633)
|
||||||
2016
|
May
2016
|
777,088
|
5.17%
|
4,853
|
||||||
2017
|
Apr
2017
|
737,584
|
5.07%
|
516
|
||||||
|
-
|
|||||||||
Agreements
which receive 3-Month LIBOR:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2011
|
Apr
2011
|
337,000
|
5.81%
|
8,575
|
||||||
2013
|
Mar
2013
|
276,060
|
3.87%
|
(13,389)
|
||||||
2014
|
Jun
2014
|
356,740
|
4.21%
|
(15,748)
|
||||||
2016
|
Apr
2016
|
13,520
|
5.57%
|
412
|
||||||
$ |
4,864,785
|
$ |
(26,831)
|
*
$237,307 of this notional receives 1-Month LIBOR only up
to
6.50%
|
The
fair
value of these agreements is estimated by obtaining counterparty quotations.
A
positive fair value represents a liability. We have recorded $47.9 million
of
gross interest rate swap assets and $21.1 million of liabilities.
(14)
|
These
are two essentially offsetting interest rate caps and two essentially
offsetting interest rate swaps, each with notional amounts
of $32.5
million, an interest rate cap with a notional balance of $17.5
million,
the swap related to the unfunded portion of our purchase of
subprime
mortgage loans with a notional amount of $337.0 million and
the swap that
did not qualify for hedge accounting with a notional amount
of $492.2
million. The maturity date of the purchased swap is July 2009;
the
maturity date of the sold swap is July 2014, the maturity date
of the
$32.5 million caps is July 2038, the maturity date of the $17.5
million
cap is July 2009 and the maturity date of the swap related
to the purchase
of subprime mortgage loans is March 2017. The fair value of
these
agreements is estimated by obtaining counterparty quotations.
A positive
fair value represents a liability; therefore, we have a net
non-hedge
derivative liability.
|
35
(a)
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures. The Company's management, with the participation
of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"))
as
of the end of the period covered by this report. The Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that
information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately
and
on a timely basis. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the
end of
such period, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
|
(b) |
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes
in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term
is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act)
occurred
during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the
Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
|
36
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
The
Company is not party to any material legal proceedings.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in
the
registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENTS
The
information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is not a complete
description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our
company. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures
made by us in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006, that discuss our business in greater detail.
This
report contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking
statements relate to, among other things, the operating performance of our
investments, the stability of our earnings, and our financing needs.
Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking
terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "potential," "intend," "expect,"
"endeavor," "seek," "anticipate," "estimate," "overestimate," "underestimate,"
"believe," "could," "project," "predict," "continue" or other similar words
or
expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions,
discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain
projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other
forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect
of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although we believe
that
the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ
materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from
forecasted results. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our
operations and future prospects include, but are not limited
to, our ability to take advantage of opportunities in additional asset classes
at attractive risk-adjusted prices, our ability to deploy capital accretively,
the risks that default and recovery rates on our loan portfolios exceed our
underwriting estimates, the relationship between yields on assets which are
paid
off and yields on assets in which such monies can be reinvested, the relative
spreads between the yield on the assets we invest in and the cost of financing,
changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and bond markets
specifically; adverse changes in the financing markets we access affecting
our
ability to finance our real estate securities portfolios in general or
particular real estate related assets, or in a manner that maintains our
historic net spreads; changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads, as well
as the success of our hedging strategy in relation to such changes; the quality
and size of the investment pipeline and the rate at which we can invest our
cash, including cash inside our CBOs; impairments in the value of the collateral
underlying our real estate securities, real estate related loans and residential
mortgage loans and the relation of any such impairments to our judgments as
to
whether changes in the market value of our securities, loans or real estate
are
temporary or not and whether circumstances bearing on the value of such assets
warrant changes in carrying values; legislative/regulatory changes; completion
of pending investments; the availability and cost of capital for future
investments; competition within the finance and real estate industries; and
other risks detailed from time to time in our SEC reports. Readers are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which
reflect our management's views as of the date of this report. The factors noted
above could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those
contained in any forward-looking statement. For a discussion of our critical
accounting policies, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Application of Critical Accounting
Policies."
Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking
statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual
results.
37
In
addition, risks relating to our management and business, which are described
in
our SEC reports include, specifically, (1) the following risks relating to
our
management: (i) We are dependent on our manager and may not find a suitable
replacement if our manager terminates the management agreement. Furthermore,
we
are dependent on the services of certain key employees of our manager and
the
loss of such services could temporarily adversely affect our operations;
(ii)
There are conflicts of interest inherent in our relationship with our manager
insofar as our manager and its affiliates manage and invest in other pooled
investment vehicles (investment funds, private investment funds, or businesses)
that invest in real estate securities, real estate related loans and operating
real estate and whose investment objectives overlap with our investment
objectives. Our management agreement with our manager does not limit or restrict
our manager or its affiliates from managing other investment vehicles that
invest in investments which meet our investment objectives. Certain investments
appropriate for Newcastle may also be appropriate for one or more of these
other
investment vehicles and our manager or its affiliates may determine to make
a
particular investment through another investment vehicle rather than through
Newcastle. It is possible that we may not be given the opportunity to
participate at all in certain investments made by our affiliates that meet
our
investment objectives; and (iii) Our investment strategy may evolve, in light
of
existing market conditions and investment opportunities, to continue to take
advantage of opportunistic investments in real estate related assets, which
may
involve additional risks depending upon the nature of such assets and our
ability to finance such assets on a short or long term basis; and (2) the
following risks relating to our business: (i) Although we seek to match fund
our
investments to limit refinance risk, in particular with respect to a substantial
portion of our investments in real estate securities and loans, we do not
employ
this strategy with respect to certain of our investments, which increases
refinance risks for and, therefore, the yield of these investments; (ii)
We may
not be able to match fund our investments with respect to maturities and
interest rates, which exposes us to the risk that we may not be able to finance
or refinance our investments on economically favorable terms; (iii) Prepayment
rates can increase, adversely affecting yields on certain of our loans; (iv)
The
real estate related loans and other direct and indirect interests in pools
of
real estate properties or loans that we invest in may be subject to additional
risks relating to the privately negotiated structure and terms of the
transaction, which may result in losses to us; and (v) We finance certain
of our
investments with debt subject to margin calls based on a decrease in the
value
of such investments, which could adversely impact our
liquidity.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item
3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item
5. Other Information
None.
38
Item
6. Exhibits
3.1 |
Articles
of Amendment and Restatement (incorporated by reference to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-90578),
Exhibit 3.1).
|
3.2 |
Articles
Supplementary Relating to the Series B Preferred Stock (incorporated
by
reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003, Exhibit 3.3).
|
3.3 |
Articles
Supplementary Relating to the Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated
by
reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.3, filed on
October 25, 2005).
|
3.4 |
Articles
Supplementary Relating to the Series D Preferred Stock (incorporated
by
reference to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-A, Exhibit 3.1, filed on
March 14, 2007).
|
3.5 |
Amended
and Restated By-laws (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form 8-K, Exhibit 3.1, filed on May
5, 2006).
|
4.1 |
Rights
Agreement between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer
and Trust
Company, as Rights Agent, dated October 16, 2002 (incorporated
by
reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2002, Exhibit
4.1).
|
10.1 |
Amended
and Restated Management and Advisory Agreement by and among
the Registrant
and Fortress Investment Group LLC, dated June 23, 2003 (incorporated
by
reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File
No. 333-106135), Exhibit
10.1).
|
10.2 |
Newcastle
Investment Corp. Nonqualified Stock Option and Incentive
Award Plan
Amended and Restated Effective as of February 11, 2004
(incorporated by
reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005, Exhibit
10.2).
|
31.1 |
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2 |
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1 |
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of
2002.
|
32.2 |
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of
2002.
|
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized:
NEWCASTLE
INVESTMENT CORP.
(Registrant)
By:
/s/
Kenneth M. Riis
Name:
Kenneth M. Riis
Title:
Chief Executive Officer and President
Date:
May 10, 2007
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/
Debra A. Hess
Name:
Debra A. Hess
Title:
Chief Financial Officer
Date:
May 10, 2007
|
40