Dror Ortho-Design, Inc. - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
þ
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008
|
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission
file number: 000-51783
NOVINT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(name of
small business issuer in its charter)
Delaware
|
85-0461778
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
4601
Paradise Blvd., NW, Suite B
Albuquerque,
NM
|
87114
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Issuer’s
telephone number (866) 298-4420
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par
value per share
Title
of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
None
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes x No
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for
the past 90 days. x
Yes o
No
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
State the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was
last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the
last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter: $28,746,177, based on 28,461,562 shares of common stock held by
non-affiliates and $1.01 per share on June 30, 2008.
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports
required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a
court. o Yes o No
(APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common
stock, as of the last practicable date: 32,259,131 shares of common
stock as of April 9, 2009.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
||
Page
No.
|
||
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
|
1
|
|
PART
I
|
||
Item
1. Business
|
2
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
11
|
|
Item
2. Properties
|
16
|
|
Item
3. Legal Proceedings
|
16
|
|
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
16
|
|
PART
II
|
||
Item
5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
17
|
|
Item
6. Selected Financial Data
|
18
|
|
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
18
|
|
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
24
|
|
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
24
|
|
Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
24
|
|
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures
|
24
|
|
Item
9B. Other Information
|
25
|
|
PART
III
|
||
Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
26
|
|
Item
11. Executive Compensation
|
28
|
|
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
29
|
|
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
31
|
|
Item
14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
31
|
|
PART
IV
|
||
Item
15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
|
33
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
36
|
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This
annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Such
forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, (a)
our projected sales and profitability, (b) our growth strategies, (c)
anticipated trends in our industry, (d) our future financing plans, and (e) our
anticipated needs for working capital. Forward-looking statements
that involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and
expectations are generally identifiable by use of the words "may," "will,"
"should," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "intend," or "project"
or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable
terminology. This information may involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance,
or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance,
or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking
statements. These statements may be found under "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
"Business," as well as in this annual report generally. Actual events
or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking
statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the
risks outlined under "Risk Factors" and matters described in this annual report
generally. This annual report may contain market data related to our
business that may have been included in articles published by independent
industry sources. Although we believe these sources are reliable, we
have not independently verified this market data. This market data
includes projections that are based on a number of assumptions. If
any one or more of these assumptions turns out to be incorrect, actual results
may differ materially from the projections based on these
assumptions. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be
no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report
will in fact occur. In addition to the information expressly required
to be included in this annual report, we will provide such further material
information, if any, as may be necessary to make the required statements, in
light of the circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading.
Each
forward-looking statement should be read in context with, and with an
understanding of, the various other disclosures concerning our company and our
business made elsewhere in this annual report as well as other public reports
that may be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission. You should not place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement as a prediction of actual results or
developments. We are not obligated to update or revise any
forward-looking statement contained in this annual report to reflect new events
or circumstances, unless and to the extent required by applicable
law. Neither the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 nor
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provides any protection
for statements made in this annual report.
When used
in this annual report, the terms the "Company," "Novint," "we," "us," "our," and
similar terms refer to Novint Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
1
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
Overview
We were
initially incorporated in the State of New Mexico as Novint Technologies, Inc.
in April 1999. On February 26, 2002, we changed our state
of incorporation to Delaware by merging into Novint Technologies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“Novint”).
We are a
technology development and licensing company in the field of haptics,
which refers to the sense of touch. We develop, market,
and sell products, applications, and technologies that allow people to use their
sense of touch to interact with computers. Our website address is
www.novint.com. Information provided on our website, however, is not
part of this report and is not incorporated herein.
We
historically derived the majority of our revenue developing professional
applications for our customers. We have completed work on a number of
contracts with companies such as Aramco, Lockheed Martin, Chrysler, Chevron,
Sandia National Laboratories, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. We intend,
however, to generate most of our future revenues from the sale of our Falcon
product (described in this section below), the associated “grips,” or handles
that are shaped to mirror the application that the product is being used to
simulate, e.g. a gun handle, a sword handle, or a steering wheel, and the sale
or license of our computer games (designed to be used with the Falcon), and
ultimately the license fees from hardware and software companies that support
the Falcon. In the third and fourth quarter of 2007, we began
shipping the Falcon to commercial retailers and distributors in the
U.S. The product was available through retailers, including Fry’s,
Tiger Direct, and J&R Music Store. We intend to further leverage
our computer touch technology to exploit opportunities in the consumer console
and PC interactive computer games market by establishing relationships with
leading video game publishers and developers and engaging additional retailers
and distributors over time to sell the product to the
public. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2007, we opened our
online store for the sale of computer games integrated to work with the
Falcon. Customers can download games for use with the Falcon by going
to our website and purchasing the haptics enabled games. We expect to
have a significant number of games across many genres available for customers to
purchase and use with the Falcon. We currently have over 45 titles
available for customers. We expect our software sales to be a
significant contributor to our revenues and earnings. Using our
haptics technology, games and applications have the crucial missing “third
sense” to human computer interaction. Users can directly and
intuitively feel the shape, texture, and physical properties of virtual objects
using our computer touch software. We have not derived any revenue
from the licensure of our technology for consumer console and PC interactive
computer games. Although
our longer term goal is to focus primarily on the video games industry, in 2009,
we expect to expand our efforts in obtaining funded contracts for high-end
haptics-based development within our Advanced Products Group
(APG). We also plan to release the first of our big AAA titles in the
second quarter of 2009. We believe that revenue generated from both
the APG and the release of our bigger Falcon-enabled games will help to sustain
our operations and allow us to expand our sales.
Recent
Developments
In
February and March 2009, we received $220,000 for three promissory note totaling
$275,000, with 150% warrant coverage. The exercise price on the warrants
was $1.00 per share with a 5-year term. The notes are secured with
our assets and intellectual property. The notes have no stated
interest rate, and principal and interest is due in February
2010. These notes are considered original issue discount notes
whereby the discount will be amortized over the lives of the
notes. If the notes are prepaid, the exercise price of the warrants
will adjust to the fair market value of our stock at the time of prepayment, subject to a floor of $0.20
and a ceiling of $1.00. If an investor sells any shares of our stock
during 120 days prior to the maturity date of the note, the strike price will
automatically reset to $2.00. If the notes are not paid
back by the maturity date, then we will have the right but not the obligation to
refinance the notes with new notes equaling the principal and accrued
interest from the
first note, with a new maturity date one year later and an annual interest rate
of five percent (5%). The new note is convertible into common stock
at a rate of $0.0625 per share on the principal balance
only. The conversion rate is subject to change based upon the
provisions in the note.
On April
15, 2008, we closed a $3,750,000 private placement of debt securities under
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to the
terms of a subscription agreement among the Company and 39 accredited
investors. Each subscriber acquired an unsecured convertible note in the
principal amount invested and a warrant to purchase shares of our common stock
with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. In each case, the number of
shares of common stock underlying the warrant equals the principal amount of the
unsecured convertible note. Each warrant is exercisable for a term of
five (5) years. The unsecured convertible notes have a three (3) year
maturity, require payment of principal and interest in full on the maturity
date, and accrue interest at a rate of seven percent (7%) beginning on the
first anniversary of their respective dates of issuance. At the
option of the holder, principal outstanding under a note may be converted into
common stock at the conversion rate then in effect, initially $1.00 per
share. Upon conversion, the holder will receive common stock at the
conversion price of $1.00 per share and additional warrants to purchase shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. The number of
shares of common stock underlying the additional warrants shall equal one-half
(1/2) the principal and interest amounts converted. The additional
warrants shall be exercisable for a term of five (5) years.
On May 6, 2008, we closed a second
round of the financing described above with 9 accredited
investors for the sale of our 7% unsecured convertible notes and warrants for an
aggregate purchase price of $703,280. In connection with this round
of financing, we were required to notify, and did notify, the investors who had
participated in the prior round of their right to participate in the second
round of financing. These investors had the option of participating
in the financing by providing written notice to the Company by May 15, 2008 of
their intent to participate, but no investors exercised this
option.
On June
9, 2008, we closed the third round of this financing with 6 accredited
investors for the sale of our 7% unsecured convertible notes and warrants for an
aggregate purchase price of $781,817.
On
December 2, 2008, we commenced a private offering to accredited investors of up
to a maximum of $3,000,000 8% Senior Secured Promissory Notes and warrants, plus
up to an additional $1,250,000 from accredited investors who are qualifying game
publishers, developers, or other strategic investors. The offering
was to terminate on February 9, 2009, unless we terminated the offering earlier
or extended the termination date up to an additional 45 days. Between
December 4, 2008 and December 9, 2008, we accepted subscriptions for an
aggregate purchase price of $600,000. As of
December 31, 2008, $300,000 of the $600,000 committed was delivered to us.
With respect to each subscriber, the number of shares of common stock
underlying the warrants equals the principal amount of the note purchased by the
subscriber divided by $1.00. The warrants are exercisable for a term
of five (5) years at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The
offering terminated on December 9, 2008.
2
Principal
Products
The
Haptics Technology Experience
Our
computer touch technology allows computer users to realistically feel objects
displayed by a computing device using a 3D haptics (or computer-touch)
device. A computer user holds onto the handle of a haptics device,
which we call a “grip,” which can be moved right-left and forwards-backwards
like a mouse, but can also be moved up and down. As the haptics
device is moved by the user, it controls a three-dimensional cursor or other
pointing icon displayed by the computer (much like a mouse controlling a
two-dimensional cursor) and when the cursor makes contact with virtual objects
displayed by the computer, the computer registers the contact and updates motors
in the haptics device (approximately 1000 times a second) creating feedback to
the handle of the haptics device and giving a realistic sense of touch in the
user’s hand.
For
example, a user can feel the recoil of a gun that has been fired, hit a virtual
golf ball, swing a sword at an ogre, throw a football, feel weight and textures
of objects, cast a spell by moving a wand, or generally interact with objects
displayed by a computer in a more realistic manner by including a detailed and
realistic sense of touch. We believe that haptics technology adds
another sensory component (the sense of touch) to make games, and other
applications, more realistic.
Our
Interactive Computer Gaming Strategy
Our
interactive computer gaming strategy is based upon the creation of a
fundamentally new way users interact when playing interactive computer games —
adding the sense of touch. The introduction of games incorporating
the sense of touch involves development of both hardware and
software. We anticipate licensing our haptics enabled hardware
designs in the future to a number of hardware manufacturers to gain support for
the technology. At the same time, once developed, we anticipate
licensing our computer touch software to a number of game publishers to create
many haptics enabled video games or licensing games developed by us to game
publishers for distribution. We are in active conversation with many
of the leading developers and publishers in the industry to integrate the Falcon
with their games. We have recently entered into an agreement with
Electronics Arts, Valve, and Eidos to modify several popular game titles for use
with our technology. We make no assurances that any further meetings
will be successful in forging relationships with other leading developers and
publishers. We also distribute “mods” to popular third party games in
order to drive the acceptance of the Falcon in the marketplace, by creating a
haptics-enabled version of these games. A “mod” is a modification to
an existing game.
Our
Haptics Hardware and Software Products
To
capture our share of the consumer game market, we provide the consumer with the
two components necessary for consumers to play with and experience haptics as
part of their gaming: hardware and software.
The Novint
Falcon
For the
hardware component, we have designed and introduced the Novint Falcon for
consumers. The Falcon is our flagship product that enables the
consumer/user to navigate, in a 3D space, the game that they are seeing on the
screen, and to feel the elements that they are seeing, including the textures,
force, centrifugal force, recoil, etc. The degree to which these
elements are felt by the user (the amount of force/impact, weight of an object)
will be determined by a game developer, which is a role Novint often fills, to
best suit the game play that they intended.
We are
creating additional hardware devices that work with the Falcon including the
handle or “grip” for the device to best mimic the grip that consumers would be
using if they were actually participating in the game they are
playing. For example, in a shooting game, we provide a gun handle, a
pistol grip, to better simulate the role the consumer is playing in the
game. There is a great opportunity to develop and sell many more
grips over time. We believe that the consumer will want to purchase
several of these grips for each Falcon they purchase. We anticipate
that users will gain a greater utility and more realistic sense of touch with
these grips, as they are paired with the appropriate games.
The
Falcon is designed for consumer retail sales and is sold at consumer price
points. We acquired rights to the base hardware designs for the
Falcon from Force Dimension, LLC (“Force Dimension”) under our development
agreement with them. As part of the transaction with Force Dimension,
Force Dimension delivered concept models from which we were able to create a
consumer design and initiate manufacturing. We contracted with a
design firm, Lunar Design, which worked with the initial concept models to
design prototypes that could be manufactured for mass sale and
distribution. A working prototype from Lunar Design that can be
manufactured for mass sale and distribution was finalized in December of
2005.
We have
had discussions with other hardware manufacturers to license our hardware
technology for use on their hardware platforms. These discussions are
ongoing, and, while we remain optimistic of their outcome, we do not in any way
guarantee an agreement with any of these companies will be
reached. We have also had discussions with console manufacturers. We
believe these manufacturers may want to license our technology as a competitive
advantage against other consoles since our technology adds a haptics aspect to
the games, differentiating them from other games and, we believe, making them
more appealing to consumers. These discussions are ongoing, and, while we remain
optimistic of their outcome, we do not in any way guarantee an agreement with
any of these companies will be reached.
3
We
believe we will be able to successfully leverage our computer touch technology
to exploit opportunities in the consumer console and PC interactive computer
games market. We believe the Novint Falcon, coupled with games
developed for it, will provide a significant improvement in experience to
gamers. It is our intent to encourage a number of manufacturers to
embrace and license the technology and, thereby, preemptively establish
ourselves as the de facto haptics standard in the industry.
Software and Games
Development for the Novint Falcon
For the
software component of the solution, we develop software and games to work with
the Falcon. We have over 45 game titles currently available for sale
on our website and expect to expand the available games across all genres of
game play over time.
One of
the ways that we create games to work with the Falcon is through direct in-house
development by our technical staff. We have also entered into several
contracts with external game developers to create games designed to showcase the
haptics features of the Falcon. In that way, we create games from the
ground up that fully use the potential of the Falcon.
Another
way that we have been able to provide games for consumers to use with the Falcon
is to integrate haptics into the games of third party publishers/developers that
enables game play with the Falcon through acquisitions or
licenses. We have acquired/licensed several games and are actively
looking to acquire/license other games that have gameplay that naturally lends
itself to 3D touch interactions, where we can incorporate the Falcon as a
controller for the game with the intention to improve the experience of the game
as mentioned above.
We are
continuing to develop and refine our haptics technologies for gaming use by
producing initial games to be packaged with the Falcon, technology
demonstrations and sample programs, and an Application Programming Interface
(“API”) to be used both internally and by third-party developers and
publishers. We have been and are continuing to develop software used
to demonstrate basic, fundamental gameplay incorporating haptics
technology. For example, we have developed software that demonstrates
what it would feel like to throw a basketball, catch a baseball, swordplay, etc.
in games. This software forms the basis of our gaming software and is
used to prove the concept of using haptics technology for video game play to
game publishers and developers. We have expanded on these base
technological capabilities and bundle mini games with the Falcon and a
collection of sports games as part of the base package.
When we
license a game, we typically have the exclusive rights to sell the game where it
uses 3D touch control. In that type of situation, we typically obtain
the exclusive license for the 3D touch field of use, obtain source code, and
integrate the Falcon as a controller for the game.
A final
way that we create games and applications for the Falcon is by licensing our
Software Developer’s Kit (“SDK”) out to game publishers and game developers so
that they can incorporate touch into their game, with or without our help and
interaction. In some cases, we will provide resident experts to
assist their developer teams. After we license our SDK to a developer
or publisher, we would then collect royalties on those game sales where the game
uses the Falcon. We anticipate that over time, as we grow, the
majority of all games developed that support the Falcon will be published by
third party publishers and will be distributed through their distribution
channels. To date, we have not yet sold any such licenses and have
generated no revenues under such arrangements.
Manufacturing
of the Falcon
We have entered into a
manufacturing agreement with VTech Communications, Ltd., a contract manufacturer
in China (the “Vtech Agreement”) for the production of the Falcon for sale to
consumers. VTech manufactures the Falcon to our specification and
ships the product to us based upon our purchase orders to them. The
lead time to build these products is currently approximately
90 days. The VTech Agreement has a term of eighteen
(18) months after the date of the first product delivery to consumer
outlets, which was in September 2007. The VTech Agreement
automatically renews every twelve (12) months unless either party gives at
least 120 days’ prior written notice of termination to the other
party. Under the VTech Agreement, we will periodically submit
purchase orders to VTech for product delivery. We placed an initial
manufacturing order for 5,000 units with VTech in November 2006 and accepted
delivery of the first Falcon units in March 2007. The
Falcon is now being sold on-line through our
website directly to
consumers in the United
States and
online through other websites, including Amazon.com. We also sell the
Falcon through retailers, including Fry’s and
Tiger Direct,and
the
Falcon and the associative haptics enabled software online via our
website. We will add more titles for sale as they become integrated
with the Falcon, and we will sell grips through our on-line store and retailers
as well.
Distribution
We
currently distribute our products through direct
online sales through our website and established web-sale sites, such as
Amazon.com. Our
products are also sold in retail stores, such as Fry’s and
Tiger Direct.
We are currently evaluating the expansion of our distribution channels to
more retail stores. We also plan to sell our products through
catalogues that cater to the same demographic that we are
targeting.
4
Other
Haptic Companies and Competition
In the
past 15 years, we believe that there have been approximately a dozen
companies involved in haptics hardware and/or software
development. Most of these companies are hardware
developers. We have been focusing many of our efforts on software
development, and we believe that we will maintain our lead in the field in
software. With respect to hardware, we believe the consumer release
of the Novint Falcon is a significant event in the field of haptics and gives us
a strong competitive advantage in our licensing strategy. We believe
that none of our potential hardware competitors have any experience with a
consumer 3D haptics enabled device. 3D haptics hardware devices
available now retail for approximately $2,000 to $15,000. Most of
these companies are potential partners. Following is a list of other
haptic companies:
·
|
SensAble
Technologies (www.sensable.com) is a haptics hardware and software
developer. Their first product was the Phantom haptics
interface. Their primary application focus is their computer
aided design products and other high end uses of haptics
technology. We have performed software development contracts
with SensAble in the past.
|
·
|
Immersion
Corporation (www.immersion.com) is primarily a 1D or 2D haptics (a Haptic
computer interaction in which forces are mechanically displayed to a user
in 1 or 2 directions of movement; examples are force feedback joysticks
and force feedback mice) hardware company. Immersion is a public company,
which has acquired other haptics device companies. They have
acquired Cybernet, Haptech and Virtual Technologies. Immersion
also purchased HT Medical, which is now called Immersion
Medical.
|
·
|
Reach
In Technologies (www.reachin.se) is an experienced haptics software
company based out of Sweden. They are a partner of Novint's and are
creating and modifying video games to support the Novint
Falcon.
|
·
|
MPB
(www.mpb-technologies.ca/space/p_freedom6s.html) is a Canadian based
haptics hardware company that has developed an interesting high end 3D
haptics hardware device, the Freedom
6.
|
·
|
Microsoft
has several haptic devices that simply vibrate and rumble, such as the
control pads for their Xbox systems. We believe our technology
offers more features and provides a richer haptic experience for the
user.
|
·
|
Force
Dimension (www.forcedimension.com), in Switzerland, has unveiled their
haptics hardware device, the Delta. Force Dimension has been
our partner and helped to develop the
Falcon.
|
·
|
FCS
Robotics (www.fcs-cs.com/robotics/) developed a large workspace haptics
device called the HapticMaster. This is another high-end device
that can be used with our software.
|
||
·
|
Logitech
sells haptics mice, wheels, and joysticks that they licensed from
Immersion and that are primarily used for gaming. Logitech’s
haptics products are two-dimensional and do not offer as many features as
our products will.
|
||
·
|
Sensegraphics,
a Swedish company, produces haptics
software.
|
Customers
During
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, our revenues were substantially
attributable to a few customers. During that period, our largest
customers were Simquest, LLC, The Falk Group, D&H Distributing, Reachin
Technologies AB, and Tiger Direct, Inc, which represented 18%, 14%, 12%, 14%,
and 14% of our total revenues, respectively.
Intellectual
Properties and Licenses
Patents
We own,
or have rights to, the following inventions, patent applications, and
patents:
5
Title
|
Application
No.
|
Filing Date
|
Patent No.
|
Issue
Date
|
|
These patent applications are
owned by Novint. They concern a technology that allows
efficient and intuitive interaction in a three-dimensional world with
familiar
two-dimensional controls. This group of applications describes
an intuitive type of haptics control object that allows developers to
create toolbars and other common types of interface
objects. These toolbars are easily accessible and greatly
improve user-interface issues related
to problems associated with depth perception of a 3D
cursor.
|
|||||
Human-computer interface including
efficient three dimensional controls
|
09/690,343
|
10/17/2000
|
6,727,924
|
4/27/2004
|
|
Human-computer interface including
efficient three
dimensional controls
|
10/831,682
|
4/22/2004
|
|||
Human-computer interface including
efficient three dimensional controls
|
12/062,306
|
4/3/2008
|
|||
This application concerns methods
for utilizing haptics in computer animation.
|
|||||
Force frames in animation
|
10/226,462
|
8/23/2002
|
|||
These patent applications are
owned by Novint. This group of applications concern specific
methods of communicating between a computer and a haptic interface
device.
|
|||||
Communications Between a Computer
and a Haptic Interface Device; Computer, Device,
and System
|
61/027,953
|
2/12/2008
|
|||
Communications Between a Computer
and a Haptic Interface Device; Computer, Device, and
System
|
12/173,014
|
7/14/2008
|
7,486,273
|
2/3/2009
|
|
Communications with a Haptic
Interface Device from
a Host Computer
|
12/363,720
|
1/31/2009
|
|||
These patent applications are
owned by Novint or licensed by Novint from Sandia National
Laboratories. They concern a user interface that provides
consistent, intuitive control interface to any application. This group of applications
describes mechanisms for the concept of a personal space. This
is a valuable and core component of e-Touch, our professional Application
Programming Interface, that allows users to customize their own personal space while
intuitively allowing interaction with a
variety of applications or virtual environments.
|
|||||
Human-computer interface
incorporating personal and application domains
|
09/649,853
|
8/29/2000
|
6,724,400
|
4/20/2004
|
|
Human-computer interface
incorporating personal and application
domains
|
10/801,756
|
3/16/2004
|
|||
These patent applications are
owned by Novint by assignment from Force Dimension. This group
of applications concerns implementation of the Falcon haptic interface
device. Counterparts in CA, EP, JP, US.
|
|||||
Device for transmitting a movement
having a parallel kinematics transmission structure providing three
translational degrees of freedom
|
PCT/EP2004/007588
|
7/9/2004
|
|||
Device for transmitting movements
and components thereof
|
PCT/EP2006/001245
|
2/10/2006
|
|||
Device for transmitting movements
and components thereof
|
PCT/EP2006/001246
|
2/10/2006
|
|||
These patent applications are
owned by Novint. They concern a method for efficiently
generating haptics models for use with existing images, without
requiring the cost of generating a
three-dimensional model. The claimed method can effectively add
a haptics dimension to the large volume of existing visual
content.
|
|||||
Coordinating haptics with visual
images in a human-computer interface
|
09/971,379
|
10/4/2001
|
7,225,115
|
5/29/2007
|
|
Coordinating haptics with visual
images in a human-computer interface
|
PCT/US02/31536
|
10/2/2002
|
|||
Coordinating haptics with visual
images in a human-computer interface
|
11/754,279
|
5/26/2007
|
|||
These patent applications are
owned by Novint or
licensed by Novint from Sandia National Laboratories. They
concern a haptics technology that allows intuitive interaction with
boundaries between interface domains. These patent applications
describe a specific type of haptics object that enables transitions between separate
domains by breaking through it.
|
|||||
Human computer
interfaces
|
60/202,448
|
5/6/2000
|
|||
Human-computer
interface
|
09/638,186
|
8/14/2000
|
6,833,826
|
12/21/2004
|
6
Human-computer interface including
haptically controlled interactions
|
09/785,696
|
2/16/2001
|
6,954,899
|
10/11/2005
|
|
These patent applications are
owned by Novint. They concern a number of haptics techniques
particularly applicable to computer games.
|
|||||
Human-computer interfaces
incorporating haptics
|
60/431,060
|
12/5/2002
|
|||
Computer Interface Methods and
Apparatuses
|
60/681,007
|
5/12/2005
|
|||
Bimodal user interaction with a
simulated object
|
11/433,173
|
5/13/2006
|
|||
Bimodal user interaction with a
simulated object
|
PCT/US2006/042557
|
10/30/2006
|
|||
This patent application is
owned by
Novint. It concerns a number of methods and apparatuses related
to communication with a user, with specific application to computer
games. Examples are drawn from a variety of games, each of
which has been implemented to utilize three-dimensional positional input devices with
force feedback.
|
|||||
Human-Computer Interfaces
Incorporating Haptics And Path-Based Interaction
|
10/729,574
|
12/4/2003
|
|||
These patent applications are
licensed by Novint from Sandia National Laboratories. They concern a
variety of navigation
techniques and control objects that utilize haptics, including techniques
based on the usage of a two-handed interface, where the user’s second hand can be used to
manipulate the user’s viewpoint within the
environment while allowing
the user’s first hand to control
navigation.
|
|||||
Multidimensional Display
Controller
|
08/834,616
|
4/14/1997
|
6,208,349
|
3/27/2001
|
|
Multidimensional Navigational
Controller
|
08/834,642
|
4/14/1997
|
|||
Navigation and Viewing in a
multidimensional space
|
11/244,584
|
10/6/2005
|
|||
Navigation and Viewing in a
multidimensional space
|
11/283,969
|
11/21/2005
|
The
following are patents licensed to us by Force Dimension, LLC:
Country
|
|
Filing
Date
|
|
Application No.
|
Registration Date
|
|
Patent
No.
|
Maximum Validity
|
|||
Canada
|
12-15-86 |
525321
|
04-14-1992 |
1,298,806
|
04-14-2009 | ||||||
Japan
|
12-10-86 |
50331/1986
|
05-20-1993 |
1,761,286
|
12-12-2006 | ||||||
Switzerland
|
12-16-1985 |
5348/85-6
|
10-31-1989 |
672089-4
|
12-16-2005 | ||||||
USA
|
12-10-1986 |
07/403,987
|
12-11-1990 |
4,976,582
|
12-11-2007 | ||||||
Europe
|
12-10-1986 |
86906759,5
|
07-17-1991 |
0250470
|
12-10-2006 |
Copyrights
We
currently own copyrights in application software and application development
tools, including the following:
|
1.
|
e-Touch,
copyright 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Novint Technologies,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Novint
sono software
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Mandrin
Pinball computer game
|
|
|
|
4.
|
IncrediBubble
computer game
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Super
Slam Ball computer game
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Newton’s
Monkey Business ™ computer game
|
7
|
7.
|
Feelin’
It ™ : Golf computer game
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Feelin’
It ™: Table Tennis computer game
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Feelin’
It ™ : Top Pin Bowling computer
game
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Feel
the Heat™ computer game
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Bogo™
computer game
|
|
|
|
12.
|
RC
Xtreme Impact™ computer game
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Feelin’
It: Blind Games™ computer game
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Newton’s
Monkey Business™ V1.5 computer game
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Duck
Launch™ computer game
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Top
Beat™ computer game
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Feelin’It™:
Airtable Hockey computer game
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Feelin’It
ArcadeRoller™ computer game
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Roly
Poly Rolland’s Pinball Challenge™ computer
game
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Haptics-Life
2: Episode 1™ computer game mod
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Second
Life Drivers computer game mod
|
|
|
|
22.
|
WoW
Drivers computer game mod
|
Trademarks
We own
the following trademarks:
|
1.
|
NOVINT,
on the Federal Principal Register, serial number 76061389, registration
number 2512087. Branding for multiple products and
services.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
FEELIN
IT, on the Federal Principal Register, serial number 77075488,
registration number 3382564.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Novint
logo, common law trademark. Branding for multiple products and
services.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
NOVINT
FALCON, application for Federal Principal Register, serial number
78561994, registration number 3469325; application for Federal Principal
Register serial number 77447596, registration number 3469325; application
for Federal Principal Register serial number
77447596.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
NEWTON
THE MONKEY, application for Federal Principal Register, serial number
77077459.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
NEWTON’S
MONKEY BUSINESS, application for Federal Principal Register, serial number
77077460.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
N
VENT, application for Federal Principal Register, serial number 77168654,
serial number 3496648; application for Federal Principal Register serial
number 77402492, serial number 3496648; application for Federal Principal
Register serial number 77402492.
|
|
8.
|
TOUCHCITY,
application for Federal Principal Register, serial number
77483553.
|
8
|
9.
|
FALCON,
application for Federal Principal Register, serial number
77447585.
|
|
10.
|
N TOUCH, application for Federal
Principal Register, serial number 77457633.
|
Licenses
We
currently hold licenses, exclusive in our fields of use, to application
software, including the following:
|
1.
|
“Glider”
computer game
|
|
|
|
2.
|
“Inago
Rage” computer game.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Impulse
Thruster ™ computer game
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Feelin’It
™: Gish computer game
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Feelin’
It ™: Crystal Quest computer game
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Klectit™
computer game
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Feelin’It™:Arctic
Stud Poker Run computer game
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Tear
Down™ computer game
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Ascension
Reborn computer game
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Feelin’It:
XLR8™ computer game
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Feelin’It:™:
Virtual Pool 3 computer game
|
|
|
|
12.
|
The
Ship computer game
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Cell
Blast ™ computer game
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Not
Cho Cheese™ computer game
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Talon
Special Ops ™ computer game
|
|
|
|
16.
|
WWII
76mm ™ computer game
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Force
Fighter™ computer game
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Feelin’
It™: Mahjong computer game
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Chomper™
computer game
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Tobbit™
computer game
|
|
|
|
21.
|
Butter
Bean™ computer game
|
|
|
|
22.
|
Cave
Brain™ computer game
|
|
|
|
23.
|
Aquabiox™
computer game
|
|
|
|
24.
|
Hook
and Sinker Fishing™ computer game
|
|
|
|
25.
|
Tunneler™
computer game
|
|
|
|
26.
|
Mo
the Mole™ computer game
|
9
|
27.
|
Feelin’
It™: Dominoes computer game
|
|
|
|
28.
|
Space
Recoil™ computer game
|
|
|
|
29.
|
The
Feel of Steel™ computer game
|
|
|
|
30.
|
Jewel
Flipper™ computer game
|
|
|
|
31.
|
Snowbear™
computer game
|
|
|
|
32.
|
Moorhuhn
Games from Phenomedia computer game
|
We are
party to a License and Royalty Agreement with Manhattan Scientifics dated
May 16, 2001, one of our shareholders. We had a prior license
agreement with Manhattan Scientifics that provided the initial funding of our
development of a web browser and content creation tools to which Manhattan
Scientifics had an exclusive license from us for specific internet fields of
use. No royalties ever became due under the original agreement by
either party and no marketable technologies were ever
developed. Under our current agreement with Manhattan Scientifics we
granted Manhattan Scientifics an exclusive sub license of our haptics
technology, within a specified field of use for “Teneo” and other
technologies. Under the agreement, Manhattan Scientifics granted to
us a license to use the “Teneo” technology that relates to dental training
interfaces and oil and gas visualization applications. Manhattan
Scientifics also assigned back to us the internet fields of use that were the
subject of the first (prior) agreement. No royalties have been
paid by either party pursuant to this license to date. No marketable
technologies have yet been developed under this agreement. The
agreement provides that we would pay to Manhattan Scientifics 5% of the net
revenues we derive from the use or sale of the “Teneo” technology. In
addition, the agreement provides that Manhattan Scientifics will pay to us 5% of
the net revenues they derive from the use of sale of the technology that is the
subject of the sub license granted to them. No such revenues have
been derived by either party and accordingly, no royalty payments are due or
owing by either party. The term of the license granted under the
current agreement is intended to be perpetual. In connection with our
agreements with Manhattan Scientifics, Manhattan Scientifics has received an
aggregate of 4,067,200 shares of our common stock and we have received an
aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Manhattan Scientifics’ common
stock.
We
license: (i) Virtual Reality Dental Training System Software; and (ii)
Voxel Notepad Software, from Teneo Computing, Inc., a company acquired by one of
our shareholders, Manhattan Scientifics. There are currently no
patents covering either the Virtual Reality Dental Training System Software or
the Voxel Notepad Software. We believe that the Harvard School of
Dentistry filed or will file a patent covering the Virtual Reality Dental
Training System Software or the Voxel Notepad Software. In addition
to Teneo’s current license, Teneo had an exclusive right to get a license for
any patents issued to Harvard School of Dentistry for the Virtual Reality Dental
Training System Software or the Voxel Notepad Software. We decided to
let this exclusive right lapse and currently have no plans to pursue such a
license.
On July
17, 2007, we acquired all of the intellectual property assets of Tournabout
Incorporated, including its video game contest and community infrastructure
software. The integration of Tournabout’s applications will enable
our customers to develop online personas, participate in community message
boards and chat rooms, post high scores, and join multiplayer games and online
tournaments.
Government
Approval and Regulation
The
growth and development of the market for Internet commerce may prompt calls for
stringent consumer protection laws, such as laws against identity theft that may
impose additional burdens on companies like us who conduct business over the
Internet. While none of the current laws governing Internet commerce
has imposed significant burdens on us to date, in the future our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely
affected by the adoption or modification of laws or regulations relating to the
Internet or the application of existing laws to the Internet or Internet-based
advertising. We are not aware of any other specific regulatory rules
or regulations that we are subject to, or any government approval of our
principal products, due to the specific nature of our business
operations.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $1,096,120 and
$1,142,986 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Employees
As of
April 9, 2009, we had a total of 4 employees, all of whom are full-time
employees.
10
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
The
statements contained in or incorporated into this report that are not historic
facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in or
implied by forward-looking statements. If any of the following risks
actually occurs, our business, financial condition, or results of operations
could be harmed.
THE
MARKET FOR HAPTICS-ENABLED TECHNOLOGIES AND HAPTICS-ENABLED PRODUCTS IS AT AN
EARLY STAGE, AND IF MARKET DEMAND DOES NOT DEVELOP, WE MAY NOT ACHIEVE OR
SUSTAIN REVENUE GROWTH.
The
market for our haptics-enabling technologies and our licensees’ haptics-enabled
products is at an early stage. If we and/or our licensees are unable
to develop demand for haptics-enabling technologies and haptics-enabled
products, we may not achieve or sustain revenue growth. We cannot
accurately predict the growth of the markets for these technologies and
products, the timing of product introductions, or the timing of commercial
acceptance of these products.
Even if
our haptics-enabling technologies and our licensees’ haptics-enabled products
are ultimately widely adopted, widespread adoption may take a long time to
occur. The timing and amount of royalties and product sales that we
receive will depend on whether the products marketed achieve widespread adoption
and, if so, how rapidly that adoption occurs. We expect that we will
need to pursue extensive and expensive marketing and sales efforts to educate
prospective licensees and end-users about the uses and benefits of our
technologies and to persuade software developers to create software that
utilizes our technologies.
CURRENTLY
OUR REVENUE IS DERIVED FROM A FEW CUSTOMERS, AND WE COULD EXPERIENCE SUBSTANTIAL
LOSSES IF A SINGLE CUSTOMER STOPS CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH US.
Currently,
our revenue is derived from a few customers. Until and unless we
secure customer relationships with substantially more customers from our
consumer sales of the Falcon and related products, it is likely that we will
experience periods during which we will be highly dependent on a limited number
of customers for that portion of our revenue. Dependence on a few
customers could make it difficult to satisfactorily negotiate attractive prices
for our products and will expose us to the risk of substantial losses if a
single dominant customer stops conducting business with us.
WE
ANTICIPATE OUR EXPENSES WILL INCREASE DRAMATICALLY IN EXECUTING OUR LONGER TERM
BUSINESS PLAN. THUS, WE MAY EXPERIENCE LOSSES IN THE NEAR FUTURE AND
MAY NOT ACHIEVE OR MAINTAIN PROFITABILITY.
We
anticipate our expenses will increase dramatically to continue to leverage our
computer touch technology and to exploit opportunities in the consumer console
and PC interactive computer gaming industry. If our revenues do not grow
significantly or if our operating expenses exceed expectations, we may not
achieve or maintain profitability.
OUR
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION DOES NOT REFLECT OUR CURRENT PRIMARY BUSINESS
STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING REVENUE GROWTH. HISTORICALLY, OUR PRIMARY
BUSINESS HAS BEEN CONTRACTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL APPLICATIONS
OF OUR TECHNOLOGIES FOR OUR CUSTOMERS, WHILE OUR CURRENT PRIMARY BUSINESS
STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING GROWTH IS DEVELOPMENT OF OUR TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMPUTER
GAMING USE.
Historically,
we have derived the substantial majority of our revenue from development
contracts. For the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, 32% and 43%, respectively, of our revenues were from development
contracts. While we anticipate that royalty revenue from licensing
our technologies and sales of products that we develop, such as the Falcon,
grips, and related games, will constitute the majority of our revenue, such
royalty and sales revenue may not increase and may decrease in the
future. Accordingly, we cannot predict our future revenues based on
historical financial information.
WE
WILL DEPEND ON PRODUCT SALES AND LICENSEES TO GENERATE ROYALTY REVENUE IN THE
FUTURE, AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SELL A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF PRODUCTS OR
ATTRACT ANY OR A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF LICENSEES.
Our
primary business strategy with respect to leveraging our computer touch
technology to exploit opportunities in the consumer console and PC interactive
computer gaming industry is to license our intellectual property to companies
that manufacture and sell haptics-enabled products (both hardware and software)
and to manufacture and sell our products directly and through
retailers. For us to be successful, we will have to attract licensees
and our licensees must manufacture and distribute haptics-enabled products in a
timely fashion and generate consumer demand through marketing and other
promotional activities. We currently do not have any licenses, and we may not be
able to attract any or a sufficient number of licensees to generate a
significant amount of royalty revenue. If we are not able to attract
any or a sufficient number of licensees or our licensees fail to stimulate and
capitalize upon market demand for products that generate royalties for us, our
revenue with respect to that business segment will not
grow. Additionally, we will have to attract retailers who will sell
our products to consumers at price points that provide us with
revenue. If we are not able to attract a sufficient number of
retailers, and if the retailers do not sell to consumers in sufficient quantity
or at prices which generate revenues, we may be unable to succeed in the gaming
applications we have developed.
11
WE
HAVE ESTABLISHED A DIRECT MANUFACTURING CONTRACT AND DIRECT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
CONTRACTS, BOTH OF WHICH ARE AREAS IN WHICH WE HAVE LITTLE
EXPERIENCE.
Much of
our growth will come from sales in the video game market. To facilitate this
part of our strategy we entered into a direct contract manufacturing agreement
with VTech Communications, Ltd. in China in 2006 for the manufacture of the
Falcon. We are developing our own initial game programs to be
packaged with the Falcon. We do not have experience or a track record
for creating hardware products or interactive video and computer
games. We cannot be sure that the games we develop will appeal to
consumers or enhance the sales of the Novint Falcon. In addition,
there will be additional risks such as cash flow management, financing
materials, and coordinating product distribution and fulfillment either
internally or by contract, all of which we have no experience in. If
we expend significant resources on these initiatives and are not successful, our
business and results of operations could be negatively impacted and the value of
our securities could decline.
DEMAND
FOR PRODUCTS THAT INCORPORATE OUR TECHNOLOGIES ARE GENERALLY SEASONAL AND
FAILURE TO DELIVER PRODUCTS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YEAR-END HOLIDAY SEASON DEMAND
COULD SUBSTANTIALLY IMPACT ROYALTY REVENUE GENERATED, IF ANY, FROM PRODUCTS THAT
INCORPORATE OUR TECHNOLOGIES.
Peak
demand for products that incorporate our technologies, especially in the gaming
market, typically occurs in the fourth calendar quarter as a result of increased
demand during the year-end holiday season. If we or our licensees do
not succeed in shipping licensed products in a timely fashion or fail to achieve
strong sales in the second half of the calendar year, it may impact our
revenues. We have limited experience in distributing our own product,
and we do not control or influence the degree to which our licensees promote our
technologies or the prices at which they sell products incorporating our
technologies. As a result, products incorporating our technologies
may not be brought to market, achieve commercial acceptance, or generate
meaningful revenue for us.
IF
RETAILERS DO NOT PURCHASE OUR PRODUCT AND GENERATE SALES TO CONSUMERS IT WILL BE
DIFFICULT FOR US TO EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS STRATEGIES AND WE MAY NOT ACHIEVE OUR
REVENUE GROWTH.
An
important part of our strategy is to create market acceptance for the Falcon
product and future products and games we may develop that will generate revenues
for us. These potential sales are important not only to generate
revenue but to create consumer awareness of our products and create a desire on
the part of third-party game and hardware developers to enter into license
arrangements with us that will similarly generate
revenues. Haptics-enabled products, however, are likely to be more
expensive to consumers than products that are not Haptic-enabled. The
greater expense of products containing our technologies may be a significant
barrier to their widespread adoption and success in consumer
markets. If we cannot generate consumer and potential licensee
interests, we will not generate sufficient revenues to support our continued
operations or expand our product lines.
IF
THE CONTRACT MANUFACTURER WITH WHOM WE HAVE ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT FAILS TO
DELIVER PRODUCTS ON TIME, OR DELIVERS PRODUCTS THAT ARE FAULTY, WE MAY NOT
ACHIEVE OUR REVENUE GROWTH.
We have
entered into a manufacturing agreement with VTech Communications, Ltd. to
manufacture the Falcon according to our specifications. We have
submitted purchase orders to VTech and anticipate submitting additional orders
as demand grows. While we believe that VTech will fulfill our orders
timely and to specification, we cannot assure that there will not be
delays. If we are unable to have our products manufactured and
delivered timely and to specifications, we may lose sales and be unable to
generate revenues.
IF
INDUSTRY LEADERS DO NOT ADOPT OUR TECHNOLOGIES, IT MAY BE DIFFICULT FOR US TO
EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS STRATEGIES, AND WE MAY NOT ACHIEVE REVENUE
GROWTH.
An
important part of our strategy is to penetrate new markets by targeting
licensees that are leaders in those markets. This strategy is
designed to encourage other participants in those markets to also adopt our
technologies. If a high-profile industry participant adopts our
technologies for one or more of their products but fails to achieve success with
those products, other industry participants’ perception of our technologies
could be adversely affected. Likewise, if a market leader adopts and
achieves success with a competing technology, our revenue growth could be
limited and other potential licensees may not license our
technologies. Finally, if no industry participant adopts our
technologies at all, we may not be able to achieve any revenue growth from
licensing our technologies.
A
SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS BASED ON OUR LICENSE
FROM SANDIA. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE SANDIA LICENSE MAY
TERMINATE OR MAKE SUCH LICENSE NONEXCLUSIVE, WHICH MAY RESULT IN A MATERIAL
NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND REVENUES.
A
significant portion of our intellectual property rights is based on our license
from Sandia National Laboratories (“Sandia”). The Sandia license is a
12-year exclusive license for human-computer haptics
interfaces. Sandia has the right to reduce our rights granted
pursuant to the Sandia license (e.g., make rights non-exclusive) if we breach
the provisions of the Sandia license or fail to meet the
$30,000 per year minimum royalties set forth in the Sandia license. A
reduction of such rights could have a negative impact on our revenues and
results of operations.
12
IF
WE FAIL TO PROTECT AND ENFORCE OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR IF LICENSORS
WHO LICENSE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS TO US FAIL TO PROTECT AND ENFORCE SUCH
LICENSORS’ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, OUR ABILITY TO LICENSE OUR TECHNOLOGIES
AND TO GENERATE REVENUES COULD BE IMPAIRED.
Our
business depends on generating revenues by licensing our intellectual property
rights and by selling products that incorporate our technologies. In
addition, a portion of our intellectual properties is licensed from Sandia, one
of our stockholders. If we or Sandia are not successful in protecting
and enforcing our respective intellectual property rights, our ability to obtain
future licenses and royalty revenue could be impaired. In addition,
if a court limits the scope of, declares unenforceable or invalidates any of our
or Sandia’s intellectual properties, current licensees may refuse to make
royalty payments or may themselves choose to challenge one or more of our
intellectual property rights. Also it is possible that:
·
|
Sandia’s
or our patents may not be broad enough to protect our proprietary
rights;
|
·
|
Sandia’s
or our patents could successfully be challenged by one or more third
parties, which could result in our or Sandia’s loss of the right to
prevent others from exploiting the inventions claimed in those
patents;
|
·
|
current
and future competitors may develop alternative technologies that are not
covered by Sandia’s patents; and
|
·
|
effective
patent protection may not be available in every country in which our
licensees do business.
|
We and
Sandia also rely on licenses, confidentiality agreements, and copyright,
trademark, and trade secret laws to establish and protect our proprietary
rights. It is possible that:
·
|
laws
and contractual restrictions may not be sufficient to prevent
misappropriation of our or Sandia’s technologies or deter others from
developing similar technologies;
|
·
|
“shrinkwrap”
and “clickwrap” license agreements upon which we will rely to protect some
of our software will not be signed by the user and may not be enforceable
under the laws of all
jurisdictions;
|
·
|
other
companies may claim common law trademark rights based upon state or
foreign laws that precede federal registration of our
trademarks;
|
·
|
current
federal laws that prohibit software copying provide only limited
protection from software pirates, and effective trademark, copyright, and
trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign
countries; and
|
·
|
policing
unauthorized use of our products and trademarks may be difficult,
expensive, and time-consuming, particularly
overseas.
|
OUR
TECHNOLOGIES MUST WORK WITH MICROSOFT’S OR ANOTHER COMPANY’S OPERATING SYSTEM
SOFTWARE. THUS, OUR COSTS COULD INCREASE AND OUR REVENUES COULD
DECLINE IF MICROSOFT OR SUCH OTHER COMPANY MODIFIES ITS OPERATING SYSTEM
SOFTWARE.
WE
INTEND TO UTILIZE THIRD-PARTY MANUFACTURERS TO PRODUCE AND DISTRIBUTE HAPTICS
INTERFACE HARDWARE DEVICES. ANY DELAYS IN DELIVERY OF THE HAPTICS
INTERFACE HARDWARE DEVICES, QUALITY PROBLEMS, OR COST INCREASES WITH RESPECT TO
SUCH MANUFACTURERS COULD CAUSE US TO LOSE CUSTOMERS AND COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT
OUR REVENUE FROM OUR GAMING BUSINESS.
We intend
to utilize third-party manufacturers to produce and distribute haptics interface
hardware devices such as the Novint Falcon. We will have limited
control over delivery schedules, quality assurance, manufacturing capacity,
yields, costs, and misappropriation of our intellectual property. Any
delays in delivery of the haptics interface hardware devices, quality problems,
or cost increases could cause us to lose customers and could adversely affect
our revenue from our gaming business.
13
IF
WE ARE UNABLE TO IMPROVE, AND REDUCE THE COST OF, OUR TECHNOLOGIES, COMPANIES
MAY NOT INCORPORATE OUR TECHNOLOGIES INTO THEIR PRODUCTS AND OUR REVENUE GROWTH
MAY BE IMPAIRED.
Our
success will depend on our ability to improve, and reduce the cost of, our
technologies and to introduce these technologies to the marketplace in a timely
and cost-effective manner. If our development efforts are not
successful or are significantly delayed, companies may not incorporate our
technologies into their products and our revenue growth may be
impaired.
WE
MAY BECOME INVOLVED IN COSTLY AND TIME-CONSUMING LITIGATION OVER PROPRIETARY
RIGHTS, WHICH MAY DELAY BRINGING PRODUCTS INCORPORATING OUR TECHNOLOGIES TO
MARKET AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUE FROM OUR GAMING BUSINESS.
We
attempt to avoid infringing known proprietary rights of third
parties. We have not, however, conducted and do not conduct
comprehensive patent searches to determine whether aspects of our technology
infringe patents held by third parties. Third parties may hold, or
may in the future be issued, patents that could be infringed by our products or
technologies. Any of these third parties might make a claim of
infringement against us with respect to our products and
technologies. Any intellectual property litigation, whether brought
by us or by others, could result in the expenditure of significant financial
resources and the diversion of management’s time and efforts. In
addition, litigation in which we are accused of infringement may cause product
shipment delays, require us to develop non-infringing technology or require us
to enter into royalty or license agreements even before the issue of
infringement has been decided on the merits. If any litigation were
not resolved in our favor, we could become subject to substantial damage claims
from third parties and indemnification claims from our licensees. We
and/or our licensees could be enjoined from the continued use of the technology
at issue without a royalty or license agreement. Royalty or license
agreements, if required, might not be available on acceptable terms, or at
all. If a successful claim of infringement were made against us and
we could not develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or
similar technology on a timely and cost-effective basis, our expenses would
increase and our revenues could decrease.
WE
PROJECT RAPID GROWTH AND CHANGE IN OUR BUSINESS, AND OUR FAILURE TO MANAGE THIS
COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS AND NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR STRATEGY OF STARTING AND
GROWING OUR GAMING BUSINESS.
Any
future periods of rapid growth may place significant strains on our managerial,
financial, engineering, and other resources. The rate of any future
expansion, in combination with our complex technologies, may demand an unusually
high level of managerial effectiveness in anticipating, planning, coordinating,
and meeting our operational needs as well as the needs of our
licensees.
PRODUCT
LIABILITY CLAIMS, INCLUDING CLAIMS RELATING TO ALLEGED REPETITIVE STRESS
INJURIES, COULD BE TIME-CONSUMING AND COSTLY TO DEFEND, AND COULD EXPOSE US TO
LOSS.
Claims
that consumer products have flaws or other defects that lead to personal or
other injury are common in the computer peripherals industry. In
particular, manufacturers of peripheral products, such as computer mice, have in
the past been subject to claims alleging that use of their products has caused
or contributed to various types of repetitive stress injuries, including carpal
tunnel syndrome. We have not experienced any product liability claims
to date. Although we seek to limit our exposure to product liability
claims by using certain provisions in licensing agreements, existing or future
laws or unfavorable judicial decisions could limit or invalidate such
provisions. If products sold by us or by our licensees cause personal
injury, financial loss, or other injury to our or our licensees’ customers, the
customers, or our licensees, may seek damages or other recovery from
us. These claims would be time-consuming and expensive to defend,
distracting to management and could result in substantial damages. In addition,
the assertion of these claims, even if unsuccessful, could damage our reputation
or that of our licensees or their products. This damage could limit
the market for our licensees’ haptics-enabled products and harm our results of
operations.
WE
ANTICIPATE RAISING ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IN THE FUTURE. FAILURE TO RAISE
SUFFICIENT CAPITAL WILL LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO OPERATE AND EXPAND OUR
BUSINESS. ADDITIONALLY, THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CLIMATE IS ONE IN WHICH
IT IS DIFFICULT TO RAISE CAPITAL.
We
anticipate raising additional funds through public or private financing,
strategic relationships, or other arrangements in the future to carry out our
business strategy. We cannot be certain that any financing will
be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure
to raise capital when needed could limit our ability to expand or maintain our
business. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to the
holders of our common stock, and debt financing, if available, may involve
restrictive covenants. Moreover, strategic relationships, if
necessary to raise additional funds, may require that we relinquish valuable
rights.
OUR
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS HAVE SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDINGS, WHICH MAY LEAD
TO CONFLICTS WITH OTHER STOCKHOLDERS OVER CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MATTERS.
Our
current directors and officers, as a group, beneficially own approximately 16.8%
of our outstanding common stock. Acting together, these persons would
be able to significantly influence matters that our stockholders vote upon,
including the election of directors and mergers or other business
combinations. Provisions in our Delaware certificate of incorporation
and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or
changes in our management. These provisions could limit the price
that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common
stock.
14
A
SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY IS TO DEVELOP HAPTICS-ENABLED
DEVICES FOR USE IN THE COMPUTER GAMING INDUSTRY AND TO DEVELOP OUR OWN
INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAMING PRODUCTS THAT INCORPORATE OUR TECHNOLOGIES. SUCH
INDUSTRY IS HIGHLY VOLATILE AND COMPETITIVE.
The
interactive computer gaming industry has historically been a volatile and highly
dynamic industry affected by changing technology, limited hardware platform life
cycles, hit products, competition, component supplies, seasonality, consumer
spending, and other economic trends. Such industry is also intensely
competitive. Interactive computer gaming products typically have life
spans of only 3 to 12 months. In addition, the market is crowded
with a large number of titles competing for limited shelf space at
retail. Our future success will depend in large part on companies
that will develop games requiring the use of our technologies to develop and
introduce new competitive products on a timely basis and to get those products
distributed widely at retail. To compete successfully, new products
must adapt to new hardware platforms and emerging industry standards, provide
additional functionality and be successfully distributed in numerous changing
worldwide markets. If we or companies that will develop games
requiring the use of our technologies were unable, due to resource constraints
or technological or other reasons, to successfully develop and distribute such
products in a timely manner, this inability would have a material adverse effect
on our operating results and our financial condition.
DEVELOPMENT
OF SUCCESSFUL INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAMING PRODUCTS IS HIGHLY UNPREDICTABLE AND
COMPLEX AND IS SUBJECT TO PLATFORM CHANGES. FAILURE TO MANAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF
SUCH GAMING PRODUCTS OR TO ANTICIPATE SUCH PLATFORM CHANGES MAY SIGNIFICANTLY
IMPACT OUR REVENUE GROWTH FROM OUR GAMING BUSINESS.
Product
development schedules are difficult to predict because they involve creative
processes, use of new development tools for new platforms and the learning
process, research and experimentation associated with development for new
technologies. Products frequently include a large amount of content
and are complex, time-consuming and costly to develop. A large
portion of the interactive computer games that we will produce or that will use
our technologies will be designed to be played on proprietary video game
platforms such as those owned by Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo. The
success of our products is significantly affected by market acceptance of the
new video game hardware systems and the life span of older hardware platforms,
and our ability to accurately predict these factors with respect to each
platform. In many cases, we will have expended a large amount of
development and marketing resources on products designed for new video game
systems that have not yet achieved large installed bases or will have continued
product development for older hardware platforms that may have shorter life
cycles than we expected. Conversely, if we did not choose to develop
for a platform that achieves significant market acceptance, or discontinue
development for a platform that has a longer life cycle than expected, our
revenue growth may be adversely affected.
SUCCESS
OF INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAMES IS INCREASINGLY “HITS” DRIVEN. THE
MARKET FOR SUCH GAMES IS HIGHLY UNPREDICTABLE AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW CONTENT IS
INHERENTLY RISKY AND EXPENSIVE.
Interactive
computer games have become increasingly “hits” driven. Additional
marketing and advertising funds are required to drive and support “hit”
products, particularly television advertising. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to produce “hit” titles, or that advertising for
any product will increase sales sufficiently to recoup those advertising
expenses. Whether games will become hits are highly dependent on
consumer tastes and moods and is highly unpredictable.
Development
of new content is inherently risky and expensive. We cannot assure
that products will be developed on time, in a cost effective manner, or that
they will be commercially successful.
OBTAINING
A LICENSE FROM HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS WILL BE REQUIRED TO PUBLISH INTERACTIVE
COMPUTER GAME TITLES ON THEIR PLATFORM. WE HAVE NOT OBTAINED SUCH
LICENSES AND MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN SUCH LICENSES ON ACCEPTABLE TERMS, OR AT
ALL.
We will
be required to obtain a license to develop and publish titles for each hardware
platform for which we will develop and publish titles. Hardware
manufacturers, including Sony (PlayStation, PlayStation 2, and Playstation 3),
Nintendo (GameCube and Wii) and Microsoft (Xbox and Xbox 360) require that we
obtain approval for the incorporation of our technologies on their
platforms. Such manufacturers are large companies with substantial
financial resources and will be able to impose a very manufacturer favored
agreement. We cannot assure that we will be able to obtain such
licenses on acceptable terms, or at all.
15
OUR
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, AND EMPLOYEES HAVE NO EXPERIENCE IN THE INTERACTIVE
COMPUTER GAMING INDUSTRY AND MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OPERATE THIS BUSINESS
EFFECTIVELY. FAILURE TO OPERATE OUR COMPUTER GAMING BUSINESS
EFFECTIVELY WILL SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT OUR REVENUE GROWTH AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
Offering
and developing interactive computer games is a substantial departure from our
current business of offering product development services and limited sales of
haptics devices. Our officers, directors, and employees have no
experience in developing, producing, pricing, marketing,
selling, or distributing interactive computer games and will rely on their
ability to employ persons that have such experience to carry out their business
strategy with respect to developing interactive computer
games. Because of our inexperience in this area, we may not be
effective in achieving success that may otherwise be attainable by more
experience.
THE
MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK MAY NOT BE LIQUID.
Our
common stock is and may continue to be thinly traded compared to larger more
widely known companies. Thinly traded common stock can be more
volatile than stock trading in an active public market. We cannot
predict the extent to which an active public market for our common stock will
develop or be sustained. Further, there is no assurance that our
common stock will be listed on any stock exchange or even remain qualified to be
quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board going forward. Failure
to do so may make it very difficult to sell our common stock.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
We lease
office space in Albuquerque, New Mexico at 4601 Paradise Boulevard, NW, Suite B,
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87114. The facility, which is approximately
4,323 square feet in size, is our primary operating offices and
headquarters. The lease has a five-year term at a base monthly rent
of $7,187. On March 1, 2009, we signed an agreement to terminate this
lease. We issued 400,000 shares of stock, paid $30,000, forfeited the
security deposit of $7,187, and transferred title to assets totaling $30,000 to
terminate the lease, and have access to 1,500 square feet of storage space and
an office for at least six months.
We also
lease a 2,000 square foot office facility in San Diego,
California. The initial twelve-month term is at a monthly base rent
of $4,040.00 and the second twelve-month term of the lease is at a monthly base
rent of $4,181.40. The lease term began on August 1, 2007 and it
expires on July 31, 2009.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We know
of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we
involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending
litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors,
officers, or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial holder of more than 5%
of our voting securities, or any associate of such persons, is an adverse party
or has a material interest adverse to our company.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
There
were no matters submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered
by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of
proxies or otherwise.
16
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market
Information
Our
common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under
the symbol “NVNT.” The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the reported high and low bid information for our common stock as
reported on the OTCBB. The bid prices reflect inter-dealer
quotations, do not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions, and do not
necessarily reflect actual transactions.
Quarter
Ended
|
High
Bid
|
Low
Bid
|
||||||
December
31, 2008
|
$
|
0.75
|
$
|
0.23
|
||||
September
30, 2008
|
$
|
0.98
|
$
|
0.68
|
||||
June
30, 2008
|
$
|
1.59
|
$
|
0.75
|
||||
March
31, 2008
|
$
|
1.02
|
$
|
0.76
|
||||
December
31, 2007
|
$
|
1.02
|
$
|
0.71
|
||||
September
30, 2007
|
$
|
1.19
|
$
|
0.71
|
||||
June
30, 2007
|
$
|
1.40
|
$
|
0.87
|
||||
March
31, 2007
|
$
|
1.50
|
$
|
0.95
|
As of
April 9, 2009, the closing sales price for shares of our common stock was $0.12
per share on the OTCBB.
Holders
As of
April 9, 2009, we have approximately 195 stockholders of record of our issued
and outstanding common stock based upon a shareholder list provided by our
transfer agent. Our transfer agent is Interwest Transfer Company,
Inc. located at P.O. Box 17136, Salt Lake City, Utah 84117, and their telephone
number is (801) 272-9294.
Dividends
We have
not paid any cash dividends, and we currently intend to retain any future
earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. Any
future determination to pay dividends on our common stock will depend upon our
results of operations, financial condition and capital requirements, applicable
restrictions under any credit facilities or other contractual arrangements, and
such other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2008, certain information related
to our compensation plans under which shares of our common stock are authorized
for issuance.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
|
|||
Plan
category
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
(a)
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
(c)
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
2,627,020
|
$
0.79
|
4,847,980
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
11,488,503
|
$
0.49
|
400,000
|
Total
|
14,115,523
|
5,247,980
|
17
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, we sold the following equity securities of the
Company that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and that were not previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or on
a current report on Form 8-K:
On
November 5, 2008, we issued 4,069 shares of common stock to Ralph Anderson
in payment for consulting services rendered to the Company in connection with
the audit of its financial statements. We relied upon the exemption
from registration as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for
the issuance of these shares. The shareholder took the shares for
investment purposes without a view to distribution and had access to information
concerning Novint and our business prospects, as required by the Securities
Act. In addition, there was no general solicitation or advertising
for the issuance of the shares. The shareholder was permitted access
to our management for the purpose of acquiring investment
information. We deem the shareholder sophisticated for the purposes
of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
applicable.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial
condition of Novint Technologies, Inc. for the fiscal years ending December 31,
2008 and 2007 should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and
the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in this
report. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon
current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans,
objectives, expectations, and intentions. Actual results and the
timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those
set forth under the Risk Factors, Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Information, and Business sections in this report. We use words such
as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,”
“expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar
expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Overview
We were
initially incorporated in the State of New Mexico as Novint Technologies, Inc.
in April 1999. On February 26, 2002, we changed our state of
incorporation to Delaware by merging into Novint Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation. We have no subsidiaries and operate our business under
Novint Technologies, Inc. We are a haptics technology company
(haptics refers to your sense of touch). We develop, market, and sell
applications and technologies that allow people to use their sense of touch to
interact with computers.
We have
derived revenues from 3D touch hardware sales, 3D touch software sales, and the
development of professional applications for our customers. We
launched our Falcon product in June 2007, and are selling it in our on-line
store and in a number of retailers and other websites. We launched an
on-line game store in November 2007. We also have completed a number
of professional application contracts with customers who desire custom developed
software.
Novint
focuses many of its efforts to exploit opportunities in the consumer console and
PC interactive games market, and is also looking to expand its efforts in other
areas of computer touch in funded projects. Using our haptics
technology, games and applications will have the crucial missing “third sense”,
touch, to human computer interaction. Users will be able to directly and
intuitively feel the shape, texture, and physical properties of virtual objects
using our computer touch software. Our haptic technology and related
hardware for consumers is the primary focus of our operations, but we will
continue to develop our professional applications. We will devote
much of our resources to further developing the video game market and seeking
new business relationships with video game developers and publishers and
hardware manufacturers. We began selling our haptic product, the
Novint Falcon, in June 2007 through our website at www.novint.com. We
currently are selling one haptic hardware product which is a haptic game
controller device called the Novint Falcon marketed in a bundled package which
includes several games. We launched an on-line game store in late
2007, where consumers can purchase and download a variety of game
titles. In 2008, we launched a pistol grip attachment for the
Falcon. Although our sales of the Novint Falcon and games since
product launch have been limited, we anticipate sales of the Novint Falcon, the
pistol grip, and games to increase resulting from the release of new software
and games in 2009. One of the most significant drivers of revenue for
Novint will be games and content. This is true not only in the
revenue we get from the games themselves, but largely because this is a
criterion we see many of our customers desiring in order to justify the Falcon
hardware purchase. For example, if the Novint Falcon has many games
available to play on it, a customer can purchase a single piece of hardware and
then over time purchase multiple games that give a unique gaming experience,
making the initial hardware purchase valuable over a larger amount of time and
across a larger number of games. In 2008, we entered into licensing
agreements with Valve Software and Electronic Arts among others, and therefore
several new AAA level games will soon be supported by the Falcon.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
High-quality
financial statements require rigorous application of accounting
policies. Our policies are discussed in our financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and are considered by management to be critical
for an understanding of our financial statements because their application
places the most significant demands on management’s judgment, with financial
reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. We review the accounting policies we use in reporting our
financial results on a regular basis. As part of such review, we
assess how changes in our business processes and products may affect how we
account for transactions. We have not changed our critical accounting
policies or practices during 2008. New accounting policies and
practices were implemented in 2007 and in 2008 as necessary based on the launch
of our haptics product sales in June 2007.
REVENUE
AND COST RECOGNITION – We recognize revenue from the sale of software products
under the provisions of Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, as amended by SOP 98-4 and SOP 98-9. SOP 97-2 generally requires
that revenue recognized from software arrangements be allocated to each element
of the arrangement based on the relative vendor specific objective evidence of
fair values of the elements, such as software products, upgrades, enhancements,
post contract customer support, installation, or training. Under SOP
97-2, if the determination of vendor specific objective evidence of fair value
for each element of the arrangement does not exist, all revenue from the
arrangement is deferred until such time that evidence does exist or until all
elements of the arrangement are delivered.
18
SOP 97-2
was amended in December 1998 by SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2 Software
Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions. SOP 98-9
clarified what constitutes vendor specific objective evidence of fair value and
introduced the concept of the “residual method” for allocating revenue to
elements in a multiple element arrangement.
Our
revenue recognition policy is as follows:
Project
revenue consists of programming services provided to unrelated parties under
fixed-price contracts. Revenues from fixed price programming contracts are
recognized in accordance with SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of
Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, and Accounting Research
Bulletin 45, Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts, using the
percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to
date compared with the total estimated costs for each contract. We
account for these measurements in the accompanying balance sheets under costs
and estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts, and billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings on contracts. Provisions for
estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made and recorded in the period in
which the loss is identified.
Revenue
from product sales relates to the sale of the Falcon haptics interface, which is
a human-computer user interface (the “Falcon”) and related accessories.
The Falcon allows the user to experience the sense of touch when using a
computer, while holding its interchangeable handle. The Falcons are
manufactured by an unrelated party. Revenue from the product sales is
recognized when the products are shipped to the customer and we have earned the
right to receive and retain reasonable assured payments for the products sold
and delivered. Consequently, if all these revenue from product sales
requirements are not met, such sales will be recorded as deferred revenue until
such time as all revenue recognition requirements are met.
Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees
and Costs, require amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related
to shipping and handling, if any, to be classified and accounted for as revenues
earned for the goods provided whereas shipping and handling costs incurred by a
company are required to be classified as cost of sales.
Arrangements
made with certain customers, including slotting fees and co-operative
advertising, are accounted for in accordance with EITF No. 01-9, Accounting for
Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the
Vendor's Products). These incentives are recognized as a reduction in
revenue or as a selling, general, and administrative expense, respectively, when
payment is made to a customer (or at the time we have incurred the obligation,
if earlier) unless we receive a benefit over a period of time and we meet
certain other criteria, such as retailer performance, recoverability, and
enforceability, in which case the incentive is recorded as an asset and is
amortized as a reduction of revenue over the term of the
arrangement.
EITF
01-14, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for
“Out-of-Pocket” Expenses Incurred, requires reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred while providing services to be characterized in
the statements of operations as revenue. Our out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with their project revenues are recognized in revenues
based on a computed overhead rate that is included in their project labor costs
to derive a project price.
In
accordance with EITF 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as
an Agent, the Company recognizes its product sales on a gross
basis. We are responsible for fulfillment, including the
acceptability of the product ordered. We have risks and rewards of
ownership such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery, or returns.
Title passes to the customer upon receipt of the product by the customer.
In accordance with our agreement with our customer, further obligation is
limited to the terms defined in its warranty.
19
Our
customers are provided a one (1) year limited warranty on the Falcon. This
warranty guarantees that the products shall be free from defects in material and
workmanship. Additionally, we offer our customers of the Falcon a 30 day
money back guarantee. We continually evaluate our reserve accounts
for both the limited warranty and 30 day money back guarantee based on its
historical activities.
IMPAIRMENT
– In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting (“SFAS”) 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we review our long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered
to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by
which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the
assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
SOFTWARE
DEVELOPMENT COSTS – We account for our software development costs in accordance
with SFAS 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased,
or Otherwise Marketed. This statement requires that, once
technological feasibility of a developing product has been established, all
subsequent costs incurred in developing that product to a commercially
acceptable level be capitalized and amortized ratably over the estimated life of
the product, which is 5 years. We have capitalized software
development costs in connection with our haptic software beginning in
2000. Amortization is computed on the straight-line basis over the
estimated life (5 years) of the haptics technology.
We follow
Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, which requires capitalization
of certain costs incurred during the development of internal use
software.
STOCK
BASED COMPENSATION – We account for stock based compensation in accordance with
SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires the measurement and recognition
of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and
directors, including employee stock options and employee stock purchases,
related to a Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on the estimated fair
values. We have used stock option awards in the past and continue to
use them as a means of rewarding our employees and directors for their continued
commitment and efforts in helping us execute our overall business
plans.
Stock
options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees as
compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based on the
fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the
option or warrant, whichever is more reliably measurable in accordance with SFAS
123 and Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Investments
That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with
Selling Goods or Services, including related amendments and
interpretations. The related expense is recognized over the period
the services are provided.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
Company has adopted all recently issued accounting
pronouncements. The adoption of the accounting pronouncements,
including those not yet effective is not anticipated to have a material effect
on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,”
(SFAS “161”) as amended and interpreted, which requires enhanced disclosures
about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the
transparency of financial reporting. Disclosing the fair values of
derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format provides a
more complete picture of the location in an entity’s financial statements of
both the derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using
derivatives during the reporting period. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. Early adoption is
permitted. At December 31, 2008, we did not have any derivative
instruments or hedging activities. Management is aware of the requirements
of SFAS 161 and will disclose when appropriate.
20
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 will provide framework for
selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements
that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. SFAS 162 will be
effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) amendments to AU Section
411. Management does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 will have a
material impact on its financial condition or results of operation.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee
Insurance Contracts – an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
60.” SFAS 163 requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim
liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence
that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial
obligation. This Statement also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to
financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and
measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim
liabilities. Those clarifications will increase comparability in
financial reporting of financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance
enterprises. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and
disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information
provided to users of financial statements. SFAS 163 will be effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Management does not expect the adoption of SFAS 163 will
have a material impact on its financial condition or results of
operation.
Results
of Operations
YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2007.
REVENUES. During
the year ended December 31, 2008, we had revenues of $435,475 as compared to
revenues of $415,047 during the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of
approximately 5%. During the year ended December 31, 2008, our
revenues were derived from the development of professional applications for
customers totaling $138,225, and the sale of our haptics technology products
totaling $297,250. Our haptics game controller device was launched in
June 2007, and our on-line game store was launched in November
2007. Our sales of our haptics technology products increased 26% from
2007, while our revenues from the development of professional applications
decreased 23% as we redirected our resources to the sales of our haptics
technology products. We will continue to provide development of
professional applications and in 2009 we expect to grow this part of our
business similarly to how we have in the past. Much of our focus will
remain on the video game business, but we expect to place more emphasis on
professional applications in our Advanced Products Group, than we had from 2006
to 2008.
COST OF
GOODS SOLD AND GROSS PROFIT (LOSS). Cost of goods sold, which
consists of the cost of the haptics technology products sold, materials
purchased for resale to customers, the direct labor incurred for delivering on
projects, warehousing and freight costs, and inventory write-downs were $811,572
for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $484,244 for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Our overall gross loss percentage was
approximately (86)% for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to a gross
loss percentage of (17)% for the year ended December 31, 2007. For
the year ended December 31, 2008, our gross profit from our development of
professional applications approximated 35%; an increase of 8% from 2007, as we
entered into more contracts that were based on cost plus terms. Our
gross loss experienced from the sale of our haptics technology product in 2008
was (143)%, an increase of 93% from 2007. Our gross loss experienced
from the sales of our haptics technology product continues to be impacted by
efforts to drive market penetration—freight costs to meet the demands of product
distribution, costs to place product into major retail chains, third-party
warehousing costs, and lower pricing for retailers and
distributors. Our warehousing costs increased $94,836 from 2007, as
the inventory levels increased, and we expanded to a second
warehouse. Additionally, in 2008, we had an inventory write-down of
approximately $213,000, which resulted from our review of the net realizable
value of our inventory. We are currently investigating warehousing
alternatives, and reviewing our distribution channels to reduce these
costs.
21
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
EXPENSES. Research and development totaled $1,096,120 for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to $1,142,986 for the year ended December 31,
2007, a decrease of $46,866 or 4%. Our research and development for
2008 decreased only slightly as we continued the development of software
applications of our haptics technology, as well as specialized grips for use
with the product. We anticipate our research and development expenses
to decrease as we adjust the rate of development of new software associated with
the haptics technology product to match the release schedule of our
games.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses
totaled $5,749,393 for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $5,266,094
for the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of $483,299 or
9%. The increase in general and administrative expenses compared to
the prior year was primarily related to the growth in the business to support
the sales and marketing of the haptics technology, offset by reduction in
business and professional fees. Business and professional fees
decreased approximately $1,293,000, royalty expense increased approximately
$323,000, and payroll and other overhead expenses increase approximately
$1,453,400 as new employees, insurance, office space, and other expenses were
added to support the business. In 2009, we are reorganizing our
infrastructure to significantly reduce our costs, while still continuing to
market the product.
DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTIZATION EXPENSE. Depreciation and amortization expense
totaled $545,029 for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $315,999 for
the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of $229,030 or
72%. This has increased as we have increased our investment in fixed
assets, intangibles, and capitalized software and hardware.
SALES AND
MARKETING EXPENSE. Sales and marketing expense totaled $484,195 for
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $1,391,792 for the year ended
December 31, 2007, a decrease of $907,597 or 65%. In 2007, we had
programs focused on the launch of the Falcon, which occurred in June 2007, and
in 2008 expenses continued for website development, trade show expenses and an
“Evangelist Program” to encourage early adopters to tell others about the
product. We will be reviewing our marketing efforts, as we plan to
launch several new games in 2009.
LOSS FROM
OPERATIONS. We had a loss from operations of $8,250,834 for the year
ended December 31, 2008, compared to a loss from operations of $8,186,068 for
the year ended December 31, 2007. Our net losses have increased as a
result of the increase in our operating expenses as described
above.
NET
LOSS. We had a net loss of $9,646,510, or $0.30 per share, for the
year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $8,096,497, or $0.27 per share, for
the year ended December 31, 2007. There was an increase in the net
loss of $1,550,013, which is a result of an increase in the loss from operations
of approximately $65,000, a decrease in interest income of approximately
$221,000, a net increase in interest expense and debt discount related to
convertible debt of approximately $1,267,000, offset by an increase in other
income of approximately $3,000.
22
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
December 31, 2008, we had a total cash balance of $55,315. Our cash
flow from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 resulted in
a deficit of $7,230,159 compared with a deficit of $6,857,213 in the same period
of the prior year. This increase in the deficit from operating
activities of approximately $373,000 was a result of increasing inventory levels
and investments in prepaid royalties, offset by an increase in payables and
accrued expenses and an overall increase in non-cash reconciling
items. Our cash flow from investing activities for the year ended
December 31, 2008 resulted in a deficit of $792,893 compared with a deficit of
$764,306 in the same period of the prior year; representing a continued
investment in games through both licensing and internal development. Our cash
flow from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 resulted in
a surplus of $5,374,000 primarily from the issuance of convertible notes payable
and other notes payable compared to a surplus of $10,070,418 in the same period
of the prior year from the net proceeds from the issuance of common
stock. Overall, our cash decreased by $2,649,052 during the year
ended December 31, 2008.
The
annual financial statements for years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets
and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We
have incurred recurring losses and at December 31, 2008, had an accumulated
deficit of $30,391,914. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we sustained a net
loss of $9,646,510. These factors, among others, indicate we may be unable
to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. These
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and
classification of liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable
to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern
is contingent upon its ability to obtain additional financing, and to generate
revenue and cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis. We
believe there are several factors in continuing as a going concern and meeting
our cash needs over the next twelve months. The first is that we have
dramatically reduced our expenses both in our direct operational expenses and in
staff and payrolls. While we do believe these expense reductions are a
significant step towards our goal of continuing as a going concern, we also
believe we still have the resources to continue to sell our hardware and
software products. Another factor in is that we have put more emphasis on
bringing in funded haptics development projects. These projects were
historically good projects for our company, in that they brought in revenue and
expanded our intellectual property portfolio. We believe we can grow our
business in professional applications within our Advanced Products Group, as
haptics has uses in a wide variety of fields, and we have a great deal of unique
expertise in haptics. We are also going to be releasing new AAA games.
These games could drive new Falcon, and we have a reasonable amount of
inventory compared to our current monthly expense rate. A final
factor in continuing as a going concern, is that we may need to raise additional
funding through debt or equity financing during the next twelve months if our
Falcon sales do not ramp up quickly enough, if we are unable to get enough
funded development contracts, or if we need to bring in that type of financing
to grow the business more quickly per our business plan.
Contractual
Obligations
We do not
have any long-term debt obligations, capital lease obligations, operating lease
obligations, or purchase obligations.
Off-Balance
Sheet Obligations
We do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to
have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures, or capital resources that is material to our
investors.
23
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
ITEM
9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURES
There
have been no changes in or disagreements with our independent auditors, A.J.
Robbins, P.C.
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Regulations
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),
require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which
are defined to mean a company’s controls and other procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files
or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms. Our management,
with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, as of
December 31, 2008, our CEO and CFO believes that:
24
(i)
|
our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and
CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure; and
|
(ii)
|
our
disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
|
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial
reporting has been designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our
internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company; provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of management
and directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to
financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at
December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework. Based on that assessment under those criteria,
management has determined that, at December 31, 2008, internal controls over
financial reporting was effective:
(b)
Changes
in Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15 (f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2008 that have
materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
25
ITEM
10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, CONTROL PERSONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT
|
Current
Management
Our
directors and executive officers, their ages, their respective offices and
positions, and their respective dates of election or appointment are as
follows:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
Held
|
Officer/Director
since
|
|||
Tom
Anderson
|
34
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the
Board and Director
|
2000
|
|||
Walter
Aviles
|
49
|
Chief
Technical Officer
|
2000
|
|||
Marvin
Maslow
|
71
|
Director
|
2000
|
|||
V.
Gerald Grafe
|
45
|
Director
|
2006
|
The
directors named above will serve until the next annual meeting of our
stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and have
qualified. Officers will hold their positions at the pleasure of the
Board of Directors, absent any employment agreement. There is no
arrangement or understanding between any of our directors or officers and any
other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected
as a director or officer, and there is no arrangement, plan, or understanding as
to whether non-management stockholders will exercise their voting rights to
continue to elect the current Board of Directors. There are also no
arrangements, agreements, or understandings between non-management stockholders
that may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of
our affairs.
Biographical
Information
Tom Anderson — CEO,
President, Acting CFO, and Chairman of the Board. Tom
Anderson, our CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of the Board, is one of the
earliest pioneers in 3D touch software. He has led Novint since its
inception and has been responsible for overseeing all aspects of its business
development. He began his work on computer touch more than ten years
ago at Sandia National Laboratories using the first PHANTOM (the first haptics
device of its kind) ever sold. Mr. Anderson was the inventor and
principal investigator during the five-year computer touch project at Sandia
responsible for developing the technology and applying it to important
problems. Mr. Anderson then worked to obtain an
exclusive license to the Sandia Technology for Novint
Technologies. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Anderson was a member of
the technical staff at Sandia National Laboratories. His
responsibilities included software programming and haptic project development.
Sandia National Laboratories is a DOE National Research
Laboratory. From 2000 to the present, Mr. Anderson has served as
the CEO of Novint Technologies, Inc., with responsibilities including all
aspects of running the company including overseeing product and project
development, business development, legal, accounting, hiring, management of
employees, and company operations. Mr. Anderson has a BS in
Electrical Engineering, Magna Cum Laude, from the University of New Mexico, and
an MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Washington, where he
studied both computer interface technology and business
management.
Walt Aviles — Chief
Technical Officer. Novint’s Chief Technical Officer, Walter A.
Aviles, has over 20 years of technical and managerial experience in
commercial, government and academic environments in the design and development
of advanced, first of a kind, human/machine interfaces, virtual environments and
robotic systems. He holds undergraduate and graduate degrees in
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Stanford University and The
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a founding member of the
Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Research Consortium (VETREC), an Associate
Editor of the MIT Press Journal Presence and a member of the Tau Beta Pi and
Sigma Chi engineering honor associations. From 1999 to 2000,
Mr. Aviles founded and operated Teneo Computing, Inc., where he worked on
projects including: a prototype dental cavity preparation simulator developed in
collaboration with the Harvard University School of Dentistry; a
three-dimensional data understanding and editing system for volumetric seismic
data developed with Mobil Oil; and a computer interface for the blind research
system developed with NHK Television of Japan. Prior to founding
Teneo Computing, from 1996 to 1999, Mr. Aviles was a Vice President of
product development at SensAble Technologies in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where
he helped establish the corporation’s software group and developed the world’s
first commercial haptics software toolkit. He also spearheaded the
development of real-time techniques and commercial applications for interaction
with volumetric models including the FreeForm application.
Marvin Maslow —
Director. Marvin Maslow is the first board member after Tom
Anderson, and is the former CEO of our principal investor, Manhattan
Scientifics. Mr. Maslow has provided a strong guiding hand in
our early growth. From June 1990 through September 1996,
Mr. Maslow served as chief executive officer of Projectavision, Inc., a
company he co-founded to develop and market video projection
technology. Since November 1996, Mr. Maslow has served as
chief executive officer and chairman of the board of Tamarack Storage Devices,
Inc. From 1999 through 2002, Mr. Maslow served as a director of
NMXS.com, Inc. For more than 20 years, Mr. Maslow has been
President of Normandie Capital Corp., a private investment and consulting
company. Mr. Maslow is credited with the starting up and
financing of more than 20 enterprises during his
career. Mr. Maslow received an A.A.S. degree from the Rochester
Institute of Technology in 1957 and an honorable discharge from the U.S. Army
Signal Corps in 1963. Mr. Maslow is the special advisor to the Board of
Directors of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., a publicly traded company which is
also one of our shareholders.
26
V. Gerald Grafe —
Director. V. Gerald Grafe is a member of our
board. Mr. Grafe is a founder of Hisey Grafe, PC, a law firm
focused on emerging companies, emerging technologies, and intellectual
property. Mr. Grafe provides strategic consulting, legal
counsel, and intellectual property services for a select group of
companies. Mr. Grafe has helped guide the formation and funding
of numerous startups, has represented early stage companies in numerous
transactions with giants in their respective fields, and serves as the corporate
secretary of several companies. Mr. Grafe became general counsel of
InLight Solutions, Inc., in 2002, where he also helped architect the creation of
three venture-funded spinouts. Prior to joining InLight,
Mr. Grafe was employed at Sandia National Laboratories, serving first as a
researcher in advanced computing, and then as an attorney in the patent and
licensing organization (where he wrote and prosecuted Sandia’s first haptics
patents). Mr. Grafe has a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, summa
cum laude, from Texas A&M University, an M.S. in Electrical and Computer
Engineering from the University of New Mexico, and was first in his class when
receiving the J.D. degree from the University of New Mexico.
Family
Relationships
There are
no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.
Involvement
in Certain Legal Proceedings
None of
our directors or executive officers has, during the past five
years:
·
|
Had
any petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law
filed by or against, or had a receiver, fiscal agent, or similar officer
appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any
partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years
before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association
of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the
time of such filing;
|
·
|
Been
convicted in a criminal proceeding or a named subject of a pending
criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor
offenses);
|
·
|
Been
the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed,
suspended, or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently
or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following
activities:
|
(i)
|
Acting
as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading
advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction
merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an
investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an
affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank,
savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or
continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such
activity;
|
(ii)
|
Engaging
in any type of business practice;
or
|
(iii)
|
Engaging
in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or
commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state
securities laws or federal commodities
laws;
|
·
|
Been
found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC
to have violated any federal or state securities law, where the judgment
in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not been subsequently
reversed, suspended, or vacated ;
or
|
·
|
Been
found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal
commodities law, where the judgment in such civil action or finding by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed,
suspended, or vacated.
|
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors, and persons who
beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to
file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes
in ownership, and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common shares
and other equity securities on Forms 3, 4, and 5
respectively. Executive officers, directors, and greater than 10%
stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all
Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on a review of the copies of
such forms received by us, and to the best of our knowledge, all executive
officers, directors, and greater than 10% stockholders filed the required
reports during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 in a timely
manner.
27
Code
of Ethics
We
adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) on
March 31, 2006, which Code of Ethics applies to all employees, including
our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions. The Code of Ethics was filed with the SEC on April 17,
2006 as Exhibit 14.1 to our annual report on Form 10-KSB.
Recommendation
of Nominees to the Board
There
were no changes to the procedures by which our stockholders may recommend
nominees to our Board of Directors.
Audit
Committee; Audit Committee Financial Expert
We do not
currently have a separately designated standing audit committee established in
accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. We are not a “listed company” under SEC rules and are not
currently required to have an audit committee.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation
The
following summary compensation table indicates the cash and non-cash
compensation earned during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and
2006 by (i) our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), (ii) our
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), (iii) the three most
highly compensated executive officers other than our CEO and CFO who were
serving as executive officers at the end of our last completed fiscal year,
whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during such fiscal year ends, and
(iv) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been
provided but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive
officer at the end of our last completed fiscal year, whose total compensation
exceeded $100,000 during such fiscal year ends.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
and Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
(
$)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Compensation
(
$)
|
Total
($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tom
Anderson,
|
2008
|
$
|
142,308
|
$
|
297,424
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
67,456
|
(1) |
$
|
—
|
$
|
23,077
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
530,265
|
||||||||||||||||
Chairman,
|
2007
|
$
|
150,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
67,456
|
(1) |
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
217,456
|
||||||||||||||||
CEO,
and CFO
|
2006
|
$
|
150,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
67,456
|
(1) |
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
217,456
|
||||||||||||||||
Walter
Aviles,
|
2008
|
$
|
147,085
|
$
|
84,978
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
118,906
|
(1) |
$
|
—
|
$
|
23,077
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
374,046
|
||||||||||||||||
CTO
|
2007
|
$
|
155,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
118,906
|
(1) |
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
273,906
|
||||||||||||||||
2006
|
$
|
155,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
118,906
|
(1) |
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
273,906
|
(1) This amount is for the value
of options granted to this named executive officer in February 2009 as a bonus
for services rendered during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Outstanding Equity Awards as of
December 31, 2008
The
following table sets forth certain information concerning stock option awards
granted to our named executive officers.
Option
Awards
|
Stock
Awards
|
||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value
of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units, or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
||||||||||
Tom
Anderson (1)
|
3,000,000
|
¯
|
¯
|
$
|
0.05
|
6/14/12
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
|||||||||
Tom
Anderson (2)
|
400,000
|
100,000
|
¯
|
$
|
0.66
|
6/10/14
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
|||||||||
Walter
Aviles (1)
|
81,515
|
¯
|
¯
|
$
|
0.01
|
11/01/10
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
|||||||||
Walter
Aviles (1)
|
705
|
¯
|
¯
|
$
|
0.01
|
11/01/10
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
|||||||||
Walter
Aviles (1)
|
1,100,000
|
¯
|
¯
|
$
|
0.05
|
6/14/12
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
|||||||||
Walter
Aviles (3)
|
800,000
|
200,000
|
¯
|
$
|
0.66
|
2/18/14
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
¯
|
(1) This
option was fully vested as of December 31, 2007.
(2) 100,000
options vest each year on June 10, starting on June 10, 2005.
(3) 200,000
options vest each year on February 18, starting on February 18,
2005.
28
Employment
Agreements
We have
an employment agreement with our CEO, Tom Anderson. Under such
agreement, he is entitled to an annual base salary of $200,000 per year, is
subject to confidentiality provisions, and is entitled to a severance of one
year’s base salary if he is terminated by the Company without
cause. This agreement does not provide provisions covering a change
in control of the Company. This agreement became effective in March
2004.
We also
have an employment agreement with our CTO, Walter Aviles. Under such
agreement, he was originally granted options to purchase 400,000 shares of our
common stock, but options to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock were
subsequently cancelled. He is currently entitled to an annual base
salary of $200,000 per year, is subject to confidentiality provisions, and is
entitled to a severance of two months’ base salary if he is terminated by the
Company without cause. This agreement does not provide provisions
covering a change in control of the Company. This agreement became
effective on November 11, 2000.
Director
Compensation
The
following table provides compensation information for our directors during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:
Name
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)
|
Stock
Awards ($)
|
Option
Awards ($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total ($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Tom
Anderson (1)
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
||||||||||||||
Marvin
Maslow
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
117,489
|
(2)
|
$
|
117,489
|
|||||||||||||
V.
Gerald Grafe
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
15,000
|
(3)
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
―
|
$
|
175,009
|
(4)
|
$
|
190,009
|
||||||||||||
________________________
(1) This
individual’s compensation as a director is reflected in the table above titled
“Summary Compensation Table.”
(2) This
represents compensation earned for fundraising and investor relations services
provided to the Company and the value of options granted in February 2009 for
non-Board services rendered during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
(3) We
granted 17,647 shares to Mr. Grafe on June 2, 2008. The value of
the stock award was calculated based on the aggregate grant date fair value
computed in accordance with FAS 123R.
(4) Mr.
Grafe is a shareholder and practicing attorney at the law firm Hisey Grafe,
P.C., which represents the Company on intellectual property and other related
matters. This amount represents the value of options granted in February 2009
for non-Board services vendered during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
We have a
director agreement with V. Gerald Grafe providing that Mr. Grafe will be
compensated for each year of service, at his election, in either (i) shares
of our common stock having an aggregate fair market value of $15,000 or
(ii) options to purchase our common stock having an aggregate fair market
value of $15,000 with an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the
time of the option grant. Mr. Grafe will also receive shares or
options in the manner described above having an aggregate fair market value of
$1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors he attends.
There are
no other director agreements between the Company and any other board
member. The remaining directors do not generally receive cash
compensation for their services as directors but are reimbursed for expenses
incurred in attending Board meetings. There is no expressed cap for
such expenses, and we will reimburse all such reasonable expenses incurred by
our directors.
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans or Individual
Compensation Arrangements
29
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Name of Beneficial Owner and
Address
|
Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
(1)
|
Percent of Shares
of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
(1)(2)
|
||||||
Executive
Officers and/or Directors:
|
||||||||
Tom
Anderson
|
6,740,118 |
(3)
|
10.4 | % | ||||
Walter
Aviles
|
2,182,220 |
(4)
|
3.4 | % | ||||
V.
Gerald Grafe
|
293,662 |
(5)
|
* | |||||
Marvin
Maslow
|
1,700,000 |
(6)
|
2.6 | % | ||||
5%
Beneficial Owners:
|
||||||||
AIGH
Investment Partners, LLC
|
3,700,000 |
(7)
|
5.7 | % | ||||
All
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group
(4 persons)
|
10,916,000 | 16.8 | % |
*
|
Less
than one percent.
|
|
(1)
|
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with
respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants
or convertible securities exercisable or convertible within 60 days
of April 9, 2009, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of
the person or entity holding such options, warrants or convertible
securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of
any other person.
|
|
(2)
|
Percentages
are based on 32,259,131 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on
April 9, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
3,315,118 shares of our common stock and an option to purchase 3,000,000
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share and an
option to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $0.66 per share. Under this last option, 100,000 additional shares vest
on June 10, 2009. Also includes a warrant to purchase 25,000 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per
share.
|
(4)
|
Includes
options to purchase 82,220 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
of $0.01 per share; 1,100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $0.05 per share; and 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $0.66 per share.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 247,453 shares of our
common stock, a warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $1.50, and a warrant to purchase 12,500 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. Also
includes options to purchase 8,709 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $0.89 per share. Under this option, 91,291
additional shares vest as legal services for the registration of patents
is completed.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
an option to purchase 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.66 per
share. Under this option up to the amount of 50,000 shares will vest
annually on June 10 of each year until 2009. Also includes an option
to purchase 1,500,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.90 per
share.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
1,800,000 shares of our common stock, a warrant to purchase 1,800,000
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share, and a
warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $1.00 per share. The address for AIGH Investment Partners, LLC
(“AIGH”) is 6006 Berkeley Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21209. Orin
Hirschman is the managing member of AIGH and exercises sole voting and
investment control over such
shares.
|
30
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Transactions
with Related Persons
The
following describes all transactions since the beginning of our last fiscal
year, and all proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant
and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person
had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Hisey
Grafe, P.C. (“Hisey”) was retained as general counsel for the
Company. Mr. Grafe, a member of our Board of Directors and a
stockholder of the Company, is a partner at Hisey. Hisey earned fees of
$146,079.28 and $132,520 in 2008 and 2007, respectively, for legal services
rendered to the Company, of which we paid Hisey $123,588.44 and $106,729 in 2008
and 2007, respectively.
In March
2004, Normandie New Mexico Corporation (“Normandie), which is owned by Mr.
Maslow, who is a member of our Board of Directors, entered into an agreement
with the Company to provide consulting services in relation to business
development and marketing support. Fees per the agreement are $6,250
per month. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we paid
$56,250 and $140,625, respectively, for these services. As of
December 31, 2008, we owed $25,000 to Normandie under the
agreement.
Director
Independence
We
currently have one director, Mr. Grafe, who is an independent director as
that term is defined under NASDAQ Rule 4200(a)(15).
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The
following table sets forth fees billed to us by our auditors during the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 for:
(i) services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and
the review of our quarterly financial statements, (ii) services by our
auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
our financial statements and that are not reported as Audit Fees,
(iii) services rendered in connection with tax compliance, tax advice and
tax planning, and (iv) all other services rendered.
Audit
Fees. Consists of the aggregate fees billed for each of the
last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by our principal
accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of
financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-Q and Form 10-QSB or
services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with
statutory and regulatory filings or engagements in those fiscal
years.
31
Audit-Related
Fees. Consists of the aggregate fees billed in each of the
last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal
accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of our financial statements.
Tax
Fees. Consists of the aggregate fees billed in each of the
last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal
accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
All Other
Fees. Consist of the aggregate fees billed in each of the last
two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant
other than the services reported above.
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures of the Audit Committee
We do not
currently have a separately designated standing audit committee established in
accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
32
PART
IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SCHEDULES
Financial
Statements; Schedules
Our
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 begin
on page F-1 of this annual report on Form 10-K. We are not required
to file any financial statement schedules.
Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, as currently in effect (13)
|
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, as
currently in effect
(9)
|
|
3.3
|
Articles of Merger
(1)
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate of Merger
(1)
|
|
4.1
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase
Warrant, March 2007 (10)
|
|
4.2
|
Form of Note
(16)
|
|
4.3
|
Form of Warrant
(16)
|
|
4.4
|
Form of Note
(17)
|
|
4.5
|
Form of Warrant
(17)
|
|
4.6
|
Form of Note
(18)
|
|
4.7
|
Form of Convertible Note
(18)
|
|
4.8
|
Form of Warrant
(18)
|
|
10.1
|
License Agreement between Novint
Technologies, Inc. and Sandia Corporation, dated April 11, 2000
(1)
|
|
10.2
|
Employment Agreement between Novint
Technologies, Inc. and Thomas G. Anderson, dated March 2004
(1)
|
|
10.3
|
Employment Agreement between
Novint Technologies, Inc. and Walter A. Aviles, dated November 2000
(1)
|
|
10.4
|
Amended and Restated 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan
(7)
|
|
10.5
|
Shareholders Agreement between
Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., Novint Technologies, Inc., and Thomas G.
Anderson, dated May 16, 2001 (2)
|
|
10.6
|
Sublicense Agreement between
Manhattan Scientifics and Novint
Technologies, Inc., dated June 24, 2000
(3)
|
|
10.7
|
License and Royalty Agreement
between Manhattan Scientifics and Novint
Technologies, Inc., dated May 16, 2001 (3)
|
|
10.8
|
Research Development and License
Agreement between Manhattan Scientifics and Novint
Technologies, Inc.,
June 24, 2000 (3)
|
|
10.9
|
Intellectual Property License
Agreement between Novint Technologies, Inc. and Force Dimension, LLC,
dated January 5, 2004 (4)
|
|
10.10
|
Amendment to Intellectual Property
License Agreement between Novint Technologies, Inc. and Force Dimension, dated May
5, 2005
(5)
|
33
10.11
|
Amendment to Intellectual Property
License Agreement between Novint Technologies, Inc. and Force Dimension
LLC, dated March 9, 2006 (6)
|
|
10.12
|
Board of Directors Agreement between V. Gerald
Grafe and Novint
Technologies, Inc., dated September 20, 2006 (7)
|
|
10.13
|
Manufacturing Agreement between
Novint Technologies, Inc. and VTech Communications Ltd., dated December
19, 2006 (8)
|
|
10.14
|
Form of Unit Subscription
Agreement, March 2007
(10)
|
|
10.15
|
Form of Investor Rights Agreement,
March 2007 (10)
|
|
10.16
|
Amendment No. 1 to Unit
Subscription Agreement, dated March 2, 2007 (11)
|
|
10.17
|
Amendment No. 2 to Unit
Subscription Agreement, dated March 30, 2007
(11)
|
|
10.18
|
Amendment No. 1 to Investor Rights
Agreement, dated March 30, 2007 (11)
|
|
10.19
|
Purchase Order with The Falk
Group, LLC, dated January 16, 2007 (12)
|
|
10.20
|
Intellectual Property Acquisition
Agreement between Novint Technologies, Inc. and Tournabout, Inc., dated July 17, 2007
(14)
|
|
10.21
|
Lease Agreement, between Floit
Properties, Inc. and Novint Technologies, Inc., dated June 21, 2007
(15)
|
|
10.22
|
Form of Subscription Agreement
(16)
|
|
10.23
|
Form of Subscription Agreement
(17)
|
|
10.24
|
Form of Subscription Agreement
(18)
|
|
10.25
|
Form
of Intercreditor Agreement (18)
|
|
10.26
|
Form of Subscription Agreement
*
|
|
10.27
|
Form of Secured Note
*
|
|
10.28
|
Form of Convertible Note
*
|
|
10.29
|
Form of
Warrant*
|
|
10.30
|
Form of Intercreditor Agreement
*
|
|
14.1
|
Code of Ethics
(7)
|
|
23.1
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm for Registration Statement (No.
333-144104) on Form S-8 *
|
|
31.1
|
Section
302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer *
|
|
31.2
|
Section
302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer *
|
|
32.1
|
Section
906 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
*
|
* Filed
herewith.
Filed on May 17, 2004 as an
exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
||
(2)
|
Filed on October 15, 2004 as an
exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
(3)
|
Filed on January 11, 2005 as an
exhibit to Amendment No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A,
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(4)
|
Filed on February 11, 2005 as an
exhibit to Amendment
No. 4 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
(5)
|
Filed on August 9, 2005 as an
exhibit to Amendment No. 7 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A,
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
34
(6)
|
Filed on April 17, 2006 as an
exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(7)
|
Filed on September 22, 2006 as an
exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(8)
|
Filed on December 20, 2006 as an
exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(9)
|
Filed on March 1, 2007 as an
exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(10)
|
Filed on March 9, 2007 as an exhibit to
our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(11)
|
Filed on May 15, 2007 as an
exhibit to our Periodic Report on Form 10-QSB, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(12)
|
Filed on May 24, 2007 as an exhibit to our
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(13)
|
Filed on June 21, 2007 as an
exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(14)
|
Filed on July 23, 2007
as an exhibit to our
Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(15)
|
Filed on July 27, 2007 as an
exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on
Form SB-2, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(16)
|
Filed on April 15, 2008 as an
exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(17)
|
Filed on May 12, 2008 as an
exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(18)
|
Filed on December 9, 2008 as an exhibit to our
Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
35
AJ.
ROBBINS, P.C.
CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
216
SIXTEENTH STREET
SUITE
600
DENVER,
COLORADO 80202
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
Albuquerque,
New Mexico
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of Novint Technologies, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Novint Technologies, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial
statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses and has an accumulated
deficit at December 31, 2008. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those
matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
AJ.
ROBBINS, P.C.
CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
/s/ AJ. ROBBINS,
P.C.
Denver,
Colorado
April 11,
2009
F-1
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
BALANCE
SHEETS
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 55,315 | $ | 2,704,367 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
57,170 | 80,724 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
674,608 | 257,787 | ||||||
Inventory
|
1,333,632 | 474,461 | ||||||
Deposit
on purchase of inventory
|
14,722 | 469,644 | ||||||
Deposits
|
12,181 | - | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total
current assets
|
2,147,628 | 3,986,983 | ||||||
|
||||||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
463,080 | 443,576 | ||||||
DEFERRED
FINANCING COSTS
|
362,247 | - | ||||||
PREPAID
EXPENSES - NET OF CURRENT PORTION
|
1,020,534 | 125,706 | ||||||
SOFTWARE
DEVELOPMENT COSTS, NET
|
585,682 | 644,308 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS, NET
|
680,367 | 405,299 | ||||||
DEPOSITS,
NET OF CURRENT PORTION
|
16,042 | 43,063 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 5,275,580 | $ | 5,648,935 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 684,277 | $ | 225,052 | ||||
Accrued
payroll related liabilities
|
939,298 | 195,549 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
323,548 | 238,060 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses - related parties
|
86,577 | 28,189 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
29,662 | 44,966 | ||||||
Notes
payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $69,952
|
230,040 | - | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
2,293,402 | 731,816 | ||||||
|
||||||||
LONG
TERM LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Convertible
notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount
of $4,132,488
|
1,029,718 | - | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
3,323,120 | 731,816 | ||||||
|
||||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, authorized 150,000,000 shares, $0.01 par
value; 32,259,131 and 31,898,955 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively
|
322,592 | 318,990 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
32,026,387 | 25,348,138 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(30,391,914 | ) | (20,745,404 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(4,605 | ) | (4,605 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
1,952,460 | 4,917,119 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 5,275,580 | $ | 5,648,935 |
F-2
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Revenue:
|
||||||||
Project
|
$ | 138,225 | $ | 178,458 | ||||
Product
|
297,250 | 236,589 | ||||||
Total
revenue
|
435,475 | 415,047 | ||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Cost
of goods sold:
|
||||||||
Project
|
90,308 | 130,166 | ||||||
Product
|
721,264 | 354,078 | ||||||
Total
cost of goods sold
|
811,572 | 484,244 | ||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
(376,097 | ) | (69,197 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||
Research
and development
|
1,096,120 | 1,142,986 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
5,749,393 | 5,266,094 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
545,029 | 315,999 | ||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
484,195 | 1,391,792 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
7,874,737 | 8,116,871 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(8,250,834 | ) | (8,186,068 | ) | ||||
|
||||||||
Other
(income) expense
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
(15,827 | ) | (236,732 | ) | ||||
Interest
expense
|
305,513 | 146,896 | ||||||
Debt
discount related to notes and convertible debts
|
1,108,197 | - | ||||||
Other
(income) expense
|
(2,207 | ) | 265 | |||||
|
||||||||
Net
other (income) expense
|
1,395,676 | (89,571 | ) | |||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (9,646,510 | ) | $ | (8,096,497 | ) | ||
|
||||||||
Loss
per share, basic and diluted:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (0.30 | ) | $ | (0.27 | ) | ||
|
||||||||
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
32,012,399 | 29,579,175 |
F-3
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
(Deficit)
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
December 31, 2006
|
19,894,091 | $ | 198,942 | $ | 12,624,562 | $ | (12,648,907 | ) | $ | (4,605 | ) | $ | 169,992 | |||||||||||
Common
stock sold for cash, net of offering costs of $439,364
|
10,330,000 | 103,300 | 9,787,336 | 9,890,636 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued related to exercise of options/warrants
|
444,811 | 4,448 | 132,236 | 136,684 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued to consultants for services
|
381,018 | 3,810 | 430,091 | 433,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for repayment of notes payable
|
232,627 | 2,326 | 355,755 | 358,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for settlement of accrued liabilities
|
507,701 | 5,077 | 595,327 | 600,404 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Options
vested for employees services
|
433,607 | 433,607 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Options
vested to consultants for services
|
980,310 | 980,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for purchase of licenses
|
9,260 | 93 | 9,908 | 10,001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued pursuant to previous investment agreements
|
99,447 | 994 | (994 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(8,096,497 | ) | (8,096,497 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balances,
December 31, 2007
|
31,898,955 | $ | 318,990 | $ | 25,348,138 | $ | (20,745,404 | ) | $ | (4,605 | ) | $ | 4,917,119 | |||||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
59,630 | 596 | 56,754 | - | - | 57,350 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued related to conversion of convertible
debts
|
72,900 | 729 | 72,170 | - | - | 72,899 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for settlement of accrued liabilities
|
90,096 | 901 | 88,849 | - | - | 89,750 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued related to exercise of options
|
135,000 | 1,350 | 66,150 | - | - | 67,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued related to cashless options
|
2,550 | 26 | (26 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Options
vested for employees services
|
- | - | 528,585 | - | - | 528,585 | ||||||||||||||||||
Options
and warrants vested to consultants for services
|
- | - | 442,510 | - | - | 442,510 | ||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
issued for financing costs
|
- | - | 112,620 | - | - | 112,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
issued with note payable
|
- | - | 75,540 | - | - | 75,540 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt
discount and beneficial conversion feature related to
convertible notes
|
- | - | 5,235,097 | - | - | 5,235,097 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | (9,646,510 | ) | - | (9,646,510 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balances,
December 31, 2008
|
32,259,131 | $ | 322,592 | $ | 32,026,387 | $ | (30,391,914 | ) | $ | (4,605 | ) | $ | 1,952,460 |
F-4
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
For
the Years Ended
|
||||||||
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (9,646,510 | ) | $ | (8,096,497 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in)
|
||||||||
operating
activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
545,029 | 315,999 | ||||||
Equipment
given to terminated employees
|
11,916 | |||||||
Amortization
of capitalized finance cost and debt discount
|
1,212,031 | 265 | ||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
57,350 | 384,656 | ||||||
Options
issued to employees and consultant for services
|
971,095 | 1,413,917 | ||||||
Amortization
of bond discount
|
- | (19,100 | ) | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
23,554 | (80,724 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(416,821 | ) | (163,720 | ) | ||||
Inventory
|
(859,171 | ) | (474,461 | ) | ||||
Deposit
on purchase of inventory
|
454,922 | (186,573 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses, net of current
|
(894,828 | ) | (125,706 | ) | ||||
Deposits
|
14,839 | (43,063 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
1,243,601 | 227,639 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses related party
|
68,138 | (49,311 | ) | |||||
Deferred
revenues
|
(15,304 | ) | 44,966 | |||||
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on contracts,
net
|
- | (5,500 | ) | |||||
Net
cash (used in) operating activities
|
(7,230,159 | ) | (6,857,213 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from (to) investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchasing
of licensing rights
|
(556,418 | ) | (131,711 | ) | ||||
Capital
outlay for software development costs and other intangible
assets
|
(101,231 | ) | (443,840 | ) | ||||
Capital
outlay for investment in debt security held-to-maturity
|
- | (1,980,900 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from maturity of debt security
|
- | 2,000,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from disposal of fixed assets
|
- | 12,025 | ||||||
Property
and equipment purchases
|
(135,244 | ) | (219,880 | ) | ||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(792,893 | ) | (764,306 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from (to) financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of options
|
67,500 | 136,684 | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
- | 10,330,000 | ||||||
Cash
paid for offering costs
|
(228,597 | ) | (396,266 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
300,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from convertible notes payable
|
5,235,097 | - | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
5,374,000 | 10,070,418 | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,649,052 | ) | 2,448,899 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,704,367 | 255,468 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 55,315 | $ | 2,704,367 | ||||
Supplemental
information:
|
||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | - | $ | 850 | ||||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Debt
discount and deferred financing cost related to convertible
notes
|
||||||||
payable
recorded against paid-in capital
|
$ | 5,235,097 | $ | - | ||||
Payment
of offering costs with 143,450 warrants
|
$ | 112,620 | $ | - | ||||
Deferred
financing cost recognize and netted against paid-in
capital
|
$ | - | $ | 54,354 | ||||
Purchase
of software and other intangible assets with 279,002 shares of common
stock
|
$ | - | $ | 337,386 | ||||
Conversion
of convertible debts with common stock
|
$ | 72,899 | $ | - | ||||
Payment
of notes payable and accrued interest with 232,627 shares of common
stock
|
$ | - | $ | 358,081 | ||||
Payment
of accrued liabilities with 90,096 and 296,700 shares, respectively, of
common stock
|
$ | 89,750 | $ | 333,519 | ||||
Payment
of services with 332,100 shares of common stock
|
$ | - | $ | 384,656 | ||||
Issuance
of 72,899 shares of common stock for the conversion of convertible notes
payable
|
$ | 72,899 | $ | - | ||||
Debt
discount related to notes payable recorded against paid-in
capital.
|
$ | 75,540 | $ | - |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
F-5
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
NOTE
1 —NATURE OF BUSINESS
Nature
of Business
Novint
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company” or “Novint”) was originally incorporated in
the State of New Mexico in April 1999. On February 26, 2002, the Company changed
its state of incorporation to Delaware by merging with Novint Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware corporation. This merger was accounted for as a reorganization
of the Company. The Company currently is engaged in the development and sale of
3D haptics products and equipment. Haptics refers to one’s sense of
touch. The Company’s focus is in the consumer interactive computer
gaming market, but the company also does project work in other areas. The
Company’s operations are based in New Mexico with sales of its haptics products
primarily to consumers through the Company’s website at www.novint.com and
retail outlets.
Going
Concern and Management’s Plans
These financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets
and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The
Company has incurred recurring losses and at December 31, 2008, had an
accumulated deficit of $30,391,914. For the year ended December 31, 2008,
the Company sustained a net loss of $9,646,510. These factors, among others, indicate that the Company may be
unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. These
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the
amounts and classification of liabilities that
may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The Company's continuation as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to
obtain additional financing, and to generate revenue and cash flow to meet its obligations on a
timely basis.
The Company believes there are several
factors in continuing as a going concern. The Company has dramatically reduced operating expenses
and staff in the first quarter of 2009 and will continue do so in areas deemed non-essential during
2009, while maintaining the
resources to continue to sell our hardware and software products. Additionally,
in the immediate timeframe, the Company has put more emphasis on haptics
development projects. These projects have historically generated revenues and expanded the intellectual property portfolio.
Lastly, the Company will
be releasing new AAA
games in the first half of
2009, which should generate additional product sales. Lastly, the Company will seek to raise additional funding through debt or equity
financing during the next twelve
months.
NOTE
2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use
of Estimates
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original
maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash
equivalents.
Marketable
Equity and Debt Securities
The
Company classifies marketable equity securities as available-for-sale.
Available-for-sale investments are recorded at fair value determined based on
quoted market prices with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and
reported as a separate component of other comprehensive loss in the accompanying
statements of operations. Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale
securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are
reflected in earnings as realized losses. Fair market values are based on quoted
market prices. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded
on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.
The Company may at times invest in debt securities, primarily U.S. Treasury
Bonds, which may be held to maturity. Held to maturity debt securities
investments are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices with
unrealized gains or losses included in earnings in the accompanying statements
of operations. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company held no investments
in debt securities.
F-6
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Accounts
Receivable/Concentration of Credit Risk
The
Company utilizes the allowance method for accounts receivable valuation,
providing for allowances for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded an allowance for doubtful
accounts totaling $1,000 and $41,500, respectively, and bad debt expense of
$(6,519) and $41,500 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Also, as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded an allowance for returns
totaling $5,500 and $2,500, respectively. The Company routinely
assesses the financial strength of its customers as part of its consideration of
accounts receivable collectibility by performing credit evaluations of
customers. Trade receivables are not collateralized. The Company generally
grants credit terms to most customers ranging from 20 to 30 days.
The
Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentration of credit risk
consist primarily of uninsured cash, cash equivalents held at commercial banks
and institutions primarily in the United States, and trade receivables from the
Company’s customers. The Company maintains all cash in bank accounts, which at
times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced a
loss in such accounts. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s cash
exceeded its financial institution fully insured depository amount by
approximately $-0- and $2,105,000, respectively.
For the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company’s revenues were
substantially attributable to a few customers. Following is a summary of the
Company’s customers with sales over 10%, and the percentage of these sales to
total sales for the years ended:
December
31,
2008
|
%
|
December
31,
2007
|
%
|
||||||||||
Project
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||
Lockheed
Martin Perry
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
$
|
35,836
|
9
|
|||||||
The
Falk Group
|
59,400
|
14
|
139,612
|
33
|
|||||||||
Simquest
LLC
|
78,825
|
18
|
10,312
|
2
|
|||||||||
Product
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||
CompUSA
|
—
|
—
|
51,528
|
12
|
|||||||||
D&H
Distributing
|
53,258
|
12
|
3,628
|
1
|
|||||||||
Reachin
Technologies AB
|
61,591
|
14
|
10,312
|
2
|
|||||||||
Tiger
Direct, Inc
|
60,044
|
14
|
14,555
|
4
|
The
Company’s Falcon haptics interface product (the “Falcon”) is manufactured by a
single manufacturer. Consequently, we are dependent on this manufacturer to
manufacture and deliver all orders of the Falcon haptics interface product. In
the event the manufacturer is unable to manufacture and deliver such product, it
will have a detrimental impact on our operations due the inability fulfill
customer orders
Inventory
Inventory
is comprised of finished goods held for sale and related freight cost related to
the Falcon haptics interface product and related accessories and is stated at
the lower of cost, determined on an average cost basis, or market. Based on the
Company’s assumptions about future demand, market conditions and obsolescence,
inventories are written-down to market value. If the Company’s assumptions about
future demand change and/or actual market conditions are less favorable than
those projected, additional write-downs of inventories may be
required. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
wrote-down and expensed approximately $218,000 of inventory based upon its’
analysis of lower of cost or market. This amount was charged to costs
of sales during the year ended December 31, 2008.
F-7
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Deposits
on Purchase of Inventory
Deposits
on inventory totaling $14,722 and $469,644 at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, relate to prepayments to the Company’s manufacturer of the Falcon.
The deposit balance is reduced when products ordered are shipped to the
Company.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, prepaid expenses, deferred costs, accrued liabilities, accounts
payable and notes payable are carried at historical cost, which approximates
their fair value because of the short-term maturities or repayment terms of
these instruments. Marketable equity and debt securities are carried at fair
value.
Sales
and Marketing Costs
Sales and
marketing costs such as advertising, marketing campaigns and related travel cost
are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred sales and marketing costs of
$484,195 and $1,391,792 in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Software
Development Costs
The
Company accounts for its software development costs in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) Number 86, Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. This statement
requires that, once technological feasibility of a developing product has been
established, all subsequent costs incurred in developing that product to a
commercially acceptable level be capitalized and amortized ratably over the
estimated life of the product, which is generally 5 years. The Company has
capitalized software development costs in connection with its haptics technology
beginning in 2000. Amortization is computed on the straight-line basis over the
estimated life (5 years) of the haptics technology. As of December 31, 2008 and
2007, the Company’s capitalized software development costs totaled $585,682 (net
of $349,793 of accumulated amortization) and $644,308 (net of $189,936 of
accumulated amortization), respectively. The estimated annual
amortization expense related to the capitalized software development cost is
approximately $155,000 per year. Amortization expense related to
software development costs for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
totaled $159,857 and $102,480, respectively.
The
Company follows Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs
of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, which requires
capitalization of certain costs incurred during the development of internal use
software. Through December 31, 2008, capitalizable costs incurred have not been
significant for any development projects. Accordingly, the Company has charged
all related costs to research and development expense in the periods
incurred.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation on property and equipment is
calculated on a straight-line depreciation method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 5 years for software and
computer equipment, and 5 years for office equipment. Repairs and
maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation expense was $103,822
and $51,973 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets consist of licensing agreements of $1,245,543 and patents of $40,706, and
are carried at cost less accumulated amortization of $605,882 at December 31,
2008 and licensing agreement of $689,125 and patents of $40,706 and are carried
at cost less accumulated amortization of $324,532 at December 31,
2007. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over
the economic life of the assets, which range between 3 and 20 years. For the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized amortization
expense of approximately $281,350 and $161,546, respectively, related to
intangible assets.
F-8
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Annual
amortization of intangible assets remaining at December 31, 2008, is as
follows:
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 371,105 | ||
2010
|
264,836 | |||
2011
|
13,784 | |||
2012
|
2,660 | |||
2013
and thereafter
|
27,982 | |||
Total
|
$ | 680,367 |
The
Company follows the provisions of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. SFAS 142 requires intangible assets to be tested for impairment in
accordance with SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, which has been superseded by SFAS 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The Company
performs a periodic review of its identified intangible assets to determine if
facts and circumstances exist which indicate that the useful life is shorter
than originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be
recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, the Company assesses the
recoverability of identified intangible assets by comparing the projected
undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets
over the remaining lives against the respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if
any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those
assets. After an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount
shall be its new accounting basis. No impairment loss was recorded in 2008 or
2007.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of
In
accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, the Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the
carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell. No impairment loss was recorded in 2008 or 2007.
Revenue
and Cost Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue from the sale of software products under the
provisions of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP 98-4 and
SOP 98-9. SOP 97-2 generally requires that revenue recognized from software
arrangements be allocated to each element of the arrangement based on the
relative vendor specific objective evidence of fair values of the elements, such
as software products, upgrades, enhancements, post contract customer support,
installation or training. Under SOP 97-2, if the determination of vendor
specific objective evidence of fair value for each element of the arrangement
does not exist, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until such time
that evidence does exist or until all elements of the arrangement are
delivered.
SOP 97-2
was amended in December 1998 by SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2 Software
Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions. SOP 98-9 clarified
what constitutes vendor specific objective evidence of fair value and introduced
the concept of the “residual method” for allocating revenue to elements in a
multiple element arrangement.
The
Company’s revenue recognition policy is as follows:
Project
revenue consists of programming services provided to unrelated parties under
fixed-price contracts. Revenues from fixed price programming contracts are
recognized in accordance with SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of
Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, and Accounting Research
Bulletin (ARB) 45, Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts, using the
percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to
date compared with the total estimated costs for each contract. The Company
accounts for these measurements in the accompanying balance sheets under costs
and estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts, and billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings on contracts. Provisions for estimated
losses on uncompleted contracts are made and recorded in the period in which the
loss is identified. As of December 31, 2008 the Company did not have
any costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts or any
billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on contracts.
For project revenue that is not under fixed price programming
contracts, we recognized the revenues as the services are completed.
F-9
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Revenue from product sales relates to
the sale of the Falcon haptics interface, which is a human-computer user
interface (the “Falcon”) and related accessories. The Falcon allows the user to
experience the sense of touch when using a computer, while holding its
interchangeable handle. The Falcons are manufactured by an unrelated party.
Revenue from the product sales is recognized when the products are shipped to
the customer and the Company has earned the right to receive and retain
reasonable assured payments for the products sold and delivered. Consequently,
if all these revenue from product sales requirements are not met, such sales
will be recorded as deferred revenue until such time as all revenue recognition
requirements are met.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had recorded $29,662 and $44,966,
respectively, of deferred
revenue, which represents fees received for product and project revenues that
have not met all revenue recognition requirements.
Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs, require
amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related to shipping and
handling, if any, to be classified and accounted for as revenues earned for the
goods provided whereas shipping and handling costs incurred by a company are
required to be classified as cost of sales. The Company’s costs associated with
shipping product items to the Company’s customers are included in the Company’s
Cost of Goods Sold, which for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 approximated
$44,620 and
$46,377,
respectively.
Arrangements made with certain
customers, including slotting fees and co-operative advertising, are accounted
for in accordance with EITF No. 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a
Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products). These
incentives are recognized as a reduction in revenue or as a selling, general,
and administrative expense, respectively, when payment is made to a customer (or
at the time the Company has incurred the obligation, if earlier) unless the
Company receives a benefit over a period of time and the Company meets certain
other criteria, such as retailer performance, recoverability and enforceability,
in which case the incentive is recorded as an asset and is amortized as a
reduction of revenue over the term of the arrangement.
EITF 01-14, Income Statement
Characterization of Reimbursements Received for “Out-of-Pocket” Expenses
Incurred, requires reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses incurred
while providing services to be characterized in the statements of operations as
revenue. The Company’s out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their
project revenues are recognized in revenues based on a computed overhead rate
that is included in their project labor costs to derive a project
price.
In accordance with EITF 99-19, Reporting
Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, the Company recognizes its
product sales on a gross basis. The Company is responsible for fulfillment,
including the acceptability of the product ordered. The Company has risks and
rewards of ownership such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery or
returns. Title passes to the customer upon receipt of the product by the
customer. In accordance with the Company’s agreement with its customer, further
obligation is limited to the terms defined in its warranty.
The Company’s customers are provided a
one (1) year limited warranty on the Falcon. This warranty guarantees that the
products shall be free from defects in material and workmanship. Additionally,
the Company offers its customers of the Falcon a 30 day money back guarantee.
The Company continually evaluates its reserve accounts for both the limited
warranty and 30 day money back guarantee based on its historical activities.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has accrued $17,000 and
$3,028, respectively, as warranty reserve.
Income
Taxes
In
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, the Company accounts for
income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets
and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
F-10
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
The
Company has adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”) as of
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in companies’ financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. As a result, the Company applies a
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties. FIN 48
only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty
percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing
authorities. As a result of implementing FIN 48, the Company’s management has
reviewed the Company’s tax positions and determined there were no outstanding,
or retroactive tax positions with less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained
upon examination by the taxing authorities, therefore the implementation of this
standard has not had a material affect on the Company.
The
Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December
31, 2008 and 2007 which if recognized would affect the Company’s effective
income tax rate.
The
Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax
issues as components of income tax expense. The Company did not recognize or
incur any accrual for interest and penalties relating to income taxes for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Loss
per Common Share
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share, (SFAS
128) provides for the calculation of “Basic” and “Diluted” earnings per share.
Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net
loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. All potentially dilutive securities have been
excluded from the computations since they would be antidilutive. However, these
dilutive securities could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had a total of 10,783,473 and
25,921,983 in potentially dilutive securities, respectively.
Stock
Based Compensation
The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share Based Payment (“SFAS
No. 123R”), under the modified-prospective transition method on
January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R requires companies to measure and
recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of
equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value. Share-based compensation
recognized under the modified-prospective transition method of SFAS
No. 123R includes share-based compensation based on the grant-date fair
value determined in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, for all share-based
payments granted prior to and not yet vested as of January 1, 2006 and
share-based compensation based on the grant-date fair-value determined in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R for all share-based payments granted after
January 1, 2006.
The
Company recognized $528,585 and $433,607 in employee share-based compensation
expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The fair
value of the stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model. In calculating the fair value of options for stock based
compensation for the year ended December 31, 2008, the following assumptions
were used: closing price of the common stock at the date of grant, risk-free
rates ranged from 4.00% to 5.25%, volatility of the options ranged from 73% to
157%, estimated lives of 3 to 10 years and exercise prices ranged from $0.66 to
$1.20 per share. In calculating the fair value of options for stock
based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2007, the following
assumptions were used: closing price of the common stock at the date of grant,
risk-free rates ranged from 5.00% to 5.15%, volatility of the options ranged
from 131% to 196%, estimated lives of 5 years and exercise prices ranged from
$0.89 to $1.01 per share.
F-11
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Stock
options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees as
compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based on the
fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the
option or warrant, whichever is more reliably measurable in accordance with SFAS
123 and Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Investments
That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with
Selling Goods or Services, including related amendments and
interpretations. The related expense is recognized over the period the services
are provided. For the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, stock options and warrants issued to
consultants and other non-employees as compensation for services that vested
during those years totaled $442,510 and $980,310,
respectively.
Registration
Rights
From time
to time, the Company will sell shares of its common stock which may include a
provision for registration rights. The Company recognizes and measures the
registration rights arrangement under a contingency basis as prescribed by SFAS
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies and FASB Staff Position EITF 00-19-2,
Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $1,096,120 and
$1,142,986 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts were
reclassified to conform to the December 31, 2008 presentation.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,”
(SFAS “161”) as amended and interpreted, which requires enhanced disclosures
about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the
transparency of financial reporting. Disclosing the fair values of
derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format provides a
more complete picture of the location in an entity’s financial statements of
both the derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using
derivatives during the reporting period. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. Early adoption is
permitted. At
December 31, 2008, the Company did not have any
derivative instruments or hedging activities. Management is aware of the
requirements of SFAS 161 and will disclose when
appropriate.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 will provide framework for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are
presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. SFAS 162 will be effective 60
days following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) amendments to AU Section
411. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 will have a
material impact on its financial condition or results of operation.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee
Insurance Contracts – an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
60.” SFAS 163 requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim
liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence
that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial
obligation. This Statement also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to
financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and
measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities.
Those clarifications will increase comparability in financial reporting of
financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises. This Statement
requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The
accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality
of information provided to users of financial statements. SFAS 163
will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of
SFAS 163 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of
operation.
F-12
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
NOTE
3 — MARKETABLE EQUITY SECURITIES
At
December 31, 2008, the Company held 8,284 shares of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.
(“Manhattan”) common stock.
As of
December 31, 2008, the marketable equity securities had an original cost of
$5,102, gross unrealized losses of $4,605 and a fair value of $497. There have
been no substantial changes in the fair value of such securities during 2008.
The Company’s marketable equity securities are carried at fair value and are
included in prepaid and other current assets in the accompanying financial
statements.
There
were no sales of marketable equity securities during the years ended December
31, 2008 or 2007.
NOTE 4 — PREPAID EXPENSES
As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, prepaid expenses totaling $1,695,142 and $383,493,
respectively, principally consist of prepayments towards marketing costs,
insurance premiums, rents and royalties which $1,020,534 and $125,706,
respectively, is considered the long-term portion. Prepayments on royalties
comprise a significant portion of the prepaid expenses at December 31, 2008 and
2007 totaling $ 1,584,037 and $301,413, respectively, of which $1,020,534 and
$125,706, respectively is considered long-term portion due to the length of the
related license and royalty agreements and the expected
realization.
NOTE 5 — PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2008 and
2007:
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Equipment
|
$ | 169,287 | $ | 177,330 | ||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
15,659 | 10,425 | ||||||
Office
equipment
|
80,846 | 14,987 | ||||||
Software
|
65,595 | 50,595 | ||||||
Tooling
|
283,361 | 252,530 | ||||||
Vehicles
|
21,483 | 21,483 | ||||||
636,231 | 527,350 | |||||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
(173,151 | ) | (83,774 | ) | ||||
$ | 463,080 | $ | 443,576 |
NOTE 6 — INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Intangible
assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2008 and 2007:
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Licensing
agreements
|
$ | 1,245,543 | $ | 689,125 | ||||
Patent
|
40,706 | 40,706 | ||||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
(605,882 | ) | (324,532 | ) | ||||
$ | 680,367 | $ | 405,299 |
NOTE
7 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
In March 2008, the Company closed on a
$2,025,000 private placement of debt securities under Regulation
D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to the terms of a
subscription agreement among the Company and the subscribers’ signatory thereto
(the "Subscription Agreement"). From April 2008 through June 2008, the Company
closed an additional $3,210,097 for an aggregate Subscription Agreement amount
of $5,235,097. Each Subscriber acquired an unsecured convertible note in the
principal amount invested and a warrant to purchase shares of the Company’s
common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. In each case, the
number of shares of common stock underlying the warrant equals the principal
amount of the unsecured convertible note. Each warrant is exercisable for a term
of five (5) years. The unsecured convertible notes have a three (3) year
maturity, require payment of principal and interest in
full on the maturity date, and accrue interest at a rate of seven percent
(7%) beginning on the first anniversary of their respective dates of issuance. At the
option of the holder, principal outstanding under a note may be converted into
common stock at the conversion rate then in effect, initially $1.00 per
share. Upon conversion, the holder will receive common stock at the conversion
price of $1.00 per share and additional warrants to purchase shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. The number of shares of
common stock underlying the additional warrants shall equal one-half (1/2) the
principal and interest amounts converted. The additional warrants shall be
exercisable for a term of five (5) years. Certain existing shareholders of
the Company are entitled to purchase notes and warrants under the terms of the
Subscription Agreement and the Company was required to create a second offering of these
notes and warrants. The Company has recorded $459,073 as deferred
financing costs associated with the closing that occurred on June 9, 2008. This
amount represents $197,049 for legal expenses associated with the private
placement, of which $117,855 remains accrued for at December 31, 2008, $149,403
paid to an investment banking company and $112,621 for the value of warrants to
purchase 143,403 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share for 5
years owed to the same investment banking company. These amounts are being
amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes.
F-13
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
The Company has determined the
convertible debenture contains a beneficial conversion feature and qualifies for
treatment under Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-27 and 00-19. The estimated
fair value of the detachable warrants of
$4,462,663 has been determined using Black-Scholes option pricing model using
the following assumptions: stock price volatility of 124% to 125%, risk free
interest rate of 3.77%; dividend yield of 0% and 3 year term. The face amount of
the convertible debenture of $5,235,097 was proportionately allocated to the
debenture and the warrants in the amount of $2,849,425 and $2,385,672,
respectively. The convertible debentures’ proportionate allocated value of
$2,849,425 was then further allocated between the debenture and the beneficial
conversion feature, and the entire remaining value of $2,849,425 was
allocated to the beneficial conversion feature. The beneficial conversion
feature of $2,849,425 was allocated to the stock due upon conversion of
$2,058,623 and the warrants due upon conversion of $790,802. In
accordance with EITF 00-27, the beneficial conversion feature attributed to the
warrants due upon conversion of $790,802 is recorded as a debt discount and will
not be amortized until the notes are converted at which time the entire discount will be
expensed. The combined total value of the initial warrant and
beneficial conversion feature attributed to the stock of $4,444,295 has been
accounted for as a debt discount that is being amortized and treated as interest
expense over the term of the convertible debenture under the effective interest
method. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s debt
discount amortization expense totaled $1,108,197, which includes $72,899
expensed upon the conversion of $72,900 of this debt. The remaining
unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2008 totaled
$4,132,488.
During
2005, the Company executed convertible promissory notes in the amount of
$358,081 to Lunar Design for the costs incurred during 2005 associated with
contracted research and development efforts. The promissory notes were
non-interest bearing, past their maturity dates (maturity dates varied
throughout 2006) and were due on demand. If the promissory notes were not paid
in full in cash at the promissory notes’ maturity date, the Company was to
convert the unpaid balance of the note into shares of the Company’s common
stock. The conversion price per share will be equal to the last sale price of
the Company’s common stock on the maturity date, or on the last business day
prior to the maturity date. Subsequent to the maturity dates, the Company
negotiated with Lunar regarding conversion terms and during the quarter ended
March 31, 2007, the Company converted the entire remaining balance totaling
$358,081 of the promissory note balance into 232,627 shares of common stock and
agreed to issue an additional 77,313 shares valued at $81,178 to cover a portion
of $141,532 as settlement, which has been recorded as interest expense during
the year ended December 31, 2007.
NOTE
8 – NOTES PAYABLE
In
December 2008, the Company issued two promissory notes totaling $300,000 secured
by all of the Company’s intellectual property, annual interest rate of eight
percent (8%), principal and interest due at maturity, and maturity date of
December 4, 2009. If the notes are not paid back by the maturity
date, then Novint will have the right but not the obligation to refinance the
notes with new notes equaling the interest and principal from the first note,
with a new maturity date of December 4, 2010 and an annual interest rate of
eight percent (8%). The new notes are convertible into common stock at a rate of
$0.50/share. Additionally, the Company issued each note holder a
detachable warrant for 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for a total
of 300,000 shares. The Company has accounted for the warrants to
purchase 300,000 shares under
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and
Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants,” as additional
consideration to the promissory notes payable with an estimated fair value of
$100,962 valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under the following
assumptions: stock price volatility of 119%; risk free interest rate of 2.24%;
dividend yield of 0% and 5 year term. The face amount of the
promissory notes of $300,000 was proportionately allocated to debt and the
estimated fair value of the warrants in the amounts of $224,460 and $75,540,
respectively. The allocable estimated fair value of the warrants
totaling $75,540 has been accounted for as a debt discount that is being
amortized and treated as interest expense over the term of the promissory
notes. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s debt
discount amortization expense totaled $5,588. The remaining
unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2008 totaled $69,952.
F-14
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
NOTE
9 —
INCOME TAXES
A
reconciliation of income tax expense using the statutory federal and state
income tax rates is as follows for the years ended December 31:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Income
tax benefit at statutory rate
|
$ | (3,276,000 | ) | $ | (1,655,000 | ) | ||
State
income taxes
|
(463,000 | ) | (389,000 | ) | ||||
Increase
in valuation allowance
|
3,739,000 | 2,044,000 | ||||||
Income
tax expense
|
$ | — | $ | — |
Deferred
income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future years for differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their basis for financial
reporting purposes. Temporary differences giving rise to the current deferred
tax asset and liability primarily relate to accrual-to-cash adjustments as the
Company follows the accrual basis of accounting for financial reporting but the
cash basis for tax purposes. The other major temporary timing differences giving
rise to the non-current deferred tax asset are net operating loss carryforwards.
The temporary differences giving rise to the non-current deferred tax liability
consist of the software costs that have been capitalized for financial reporting
purposes but are deductible for tax reporting purposes.
Deferred
income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future years of differences between
the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their basis for financial reporting
purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
2008
|
|
2007
|
||||||
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
$ | 9,550,000 | $ | 6,446,000 | ||||
Accrual-to-cash
adjustment
|
(123,000 | ) | 100,000 | |||||
Software
development costs
|
211,000 | 172,000 | ||||||
Options
granted for services
|
1,650,000 | 1,228,000 | ||||||
Other
|
486,000 | 84,000 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(11,774,000 | ) | (8,030,000 | ) | ||||
$ | — | $ | — |
As a
result of the significant net losses incurred since inception and because the
likelihood of being able to utilize these losses is not presently determinable,
the Company has recorded a valuation allowance to fully reserve its net deferred
tax asset.
At
December 31, 2008, the Company has available unused state and federal operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $23.1 million for federal taxes and $21.2
million for state taxes that may provide future tax benefits, expiring between
2008 and 2011 for state taxes and 2021 through 2027 for federal taxes, as
follows:
Federal
|
State
|
|||||||
NOL
carryforward expiration:
|
||||||||
2009
|
$ | — | $ | 726,000 | ||||
2010
|
— | 3,069,000 | ||||||
2011
|
— | 2,430,000 | ||||||
2012
|
— | 6,952,000 | ||||||
2013
|
— | 8,000,000 | ||||||
Thereafter
|
23,095,000 | — | ||||||
$ | 23,095,000 | $ | 21,177,000 |
F-15
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
NOTE 10 — GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSE BREAKOUT
The
breakout by major category (categories greater than 5% of the 2008 and 2007
total general and administrative expense balance) is listed below for the
respective years ended December 31:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Consultant
and employee compensation
|
$ | 3,679,437 | $ | 3,697,817 | ||||
Professional
fees
|
885,170 | 895,415 | ||||||
Insurance
|
314,977 | 174,705 | ||||||
Royalties
|
429,772 | 107,087 | ||||||
Remaining
(accounts not greater than 5%)
|
440,037 | 391,070 | ||||||
$ | 5,749,393 | $ | 5,266,094 |
NOTE 11 — COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
From time
to time, in the normal course of business, the Company is subject to routine
litigation incidental to its business. Although there can be no assurances as to
the ultimate disposition of any such matters, it is the opinion of management,
based upon the information available at this time, that there are no matters,
individually or in the aggregate, that will have a material adverse effect on
the results of operations and financial condition of the Company.
Licensing
Agreements
The
Company has a licensing agreement with Sandia National Laboratories (“Sandia”),
which initially developed Flight, the precursor to e-TouchTM (the “technology”)
and employed the Company’s founder. The licensing agreement provides the Company
the right to utilize the technology exclusively for a period of 12 years
(expiring in 2011) and non-exclusively in perpetuity and places certain
restrictions on its use as well as requires the Company to pay a 1.5 percent
royalty fee to Sandia in connection with any income earned based upon the
technology. Additionally, under the original agreement, the Company is obligated
to pay to Sandia on a semi-annual basis annual minimum earned royalties of
$6,000 in 2001, $14,000 in 2002, $24,000 in 2003 and $30,000 from 2004 through
2011. The agreement was amended on June 29, 2005, modifying the royalty payment
terms such that the Company will pay royalties of $40,000 for 2001 and 2002,
$24,000 in 2003, 30,000 shares of the Company’s common Stock in 2004, and
$30,000 for 2005. Novint had paid all cash amounts due and issued the agreed
shares of common stock for its obligations up through December 31,
2007. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has accrued the
$30,000 minimum royalty payment required for 2008 since cash payment was not
made during the year.
The
Sandia agreement also allows for sublicensure of the technology to others, which
was provided to Manhattan, one of the Company’s shareholders, under an agreement
dated June 24, 2000. This agreement was superseded by the Final License and
Royalty Agreement dated May 16, 2001, through which Manhattan acquired all of
the shares of Teneo. Manhattan then entered into an agreement with the Company
concerning Teneo’s intellectual property. The agreement between the Company and
Manhattan, also dated May 16, 2001, grants an exclusive right to all of the
intellectual property previously held by Teneo and grants Manhattan an exclusive
right to all Novint intellectual property within a particular Field of
Use.
Under
this agreement, Novint is entitled to a 5% royalty on net revenues derived from
such sublicense. Any previous agreements granting the Company’s intellectual
property to Manhattan were superseded.
From the
date of the agreement through December 31, 2008, the Company had not earned or
received royalties associated with this agreement.
On
January 5, 2004, the Company entered into an exclusive Intellectual Property
License Agreement (“Agreement”) with Force Dimension, a company in the haptics
hardware technologies and products field. The Agreement provides the Company
with a sublicense to a hardware patent and an assignment of a pending patent
from Force Dimension. The Agreement, in turn, provides Force Dimension a
security interest and a general lien in the assigned patent as well as an
irrevocable, exclusive license in the patent that has been assigned to the
Company. On May 10, 2005, the Company amended its contract with Force Dimension,
Inc. to provide for: a license fee in the amount of $15,000 due on the effective
date; the payment of a milestone payment in the amount of $50,000 within ten
days of the contract amendment’s effective date; a license fee in the amount of
$50,000 within 30 days of the Company’s IPO; and a support and license fee in
the amount of $455,000 due no later than January 5, 2006, for all technical and
support services rendered to the Company during such time period for total
payments of $620,000.
F-16
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
In
addition, the Company was to issue 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock
within 30 days of the contract amendment’s effective date as consideration for
extending the payment terms of the Agreement. These shares of stock were issued
to Force Dimension on May 12, 2005, and have been accounted for as a financing
cost related to a modification of Novint’s payment terms. The fair value of the
stock issued is $250,000 and is reflected as interest expense in the amount of
$245,968 for the year ended December 31, 2005, and $4,032 for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company paid $15,000 to Force Dimension
for the license fee due on the effective date. During 2005, Novint
paid $140,000 to Force Dimension, representing a portion of the $50,000
milestone payment originally due to Force Dimension upon or before Novint’s
receipt of the Second Deliverable as described in the original agreement, the
$50,000 milestone payment due on the amendment’s effective date, and $50,000
representing a portion of the licensing fees due. The Second Deliverable was
received by Novint on December 30, 2004. The remaining amount of $465,000 due to
Force Dimensions was recorded as accrued research and development liabilities as
of December 31, 2005 then completely settled in March 2006 through the issuance
of 607,500 shares of common stock.
The
Agreement requires Novint to pay up to $15 million to Force Dimension, including
the amounts above, on a per unit of Licensed Product basis for license fees,
royalties and a percentage of product sales after the product becomes
technologically feasible. There is an annual guaranteed minimum
payment due of $50,000. This amount was paid for 2008 and 2007 and
the Company has accrued for the 2009 amount as it is due in advance. In
addition, Novint is entitled to 5% license fees/royalties for any licensed
products sold related to the sublicense granted to Force Dimension by Novint.
Novint has not recorded any fees related to such arrangement. This Agreement
shall terminate upon Novint’s payment in total of $15,000,000 to Force Dimension
and payment in full of any other obligations arising pursuant to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.
The
Company also has other licensing agreements with various parties providing
gaming software. These licensing agreements have royalty provisions which
require royalty fees ranging from 5% to 50% of either gross revenue or net
revenue and one licensing agreement has a royalty provision of $0.50 per
end user. Royalty fees paid or accrued for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 related to these licensing agreements approximated $1,767,397 and
$102,525, respectively, of which $1,584,037 and $301,413 remains as prepaid
expenses as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Based upon reaching
certain milestones, the Company may be required to pay additional
amounts.
Employment
Agreements
The
Company has a perpetual employment agreement with the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer. Under the agreement, he is entitled to an annual base salary of
$200,000 per year and cash bonus to be determined by the Company, is subject to
confidentiality provisions and is entitled to a severance of one year base
salary if he is terminated by the Company without cause. As of
December 31, 2008, there is $20,604 of salary that has been deferred, and not
yet paid.
The
Company also has a perpetual employment agreement with the Chief Technology
Officer. Under such agreement, he was originally granted options to purchase
400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, but options to purchase 200,000
shares were cancelled. He is entitled to an annual base salary of
$200,000 per year and cash bonus to be determined by the Company, is subject to
confidentiality provisions and is entitled to a severance of two months base
salary if he is terminated by the Company without cause. As of December 31,
2008, there is $20,604 of salary that has been deferred, and not yet
paid.
F-17
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Consultant
Agreement
Effective
May 1, 2006, the Company entered into negotiations for a consultant
agreement (“Agreement”) with AF Double Eagle (“Consultant”) whereby Consultant
will become a full time employee of the Company approximately 6 months
after the effective date of the Agreement. The Company and Consultant may
transition to Consultant becoming a full time employee earlier upon mutual
consent. In accordance with the agreement, Consultant will assist the Company in
revenue generation, strategic partnering, strategic planning, funding process
and general corporate operations.
Compensation
arrangements to the Consultant are as follows:
Cash
compensation — The Company will pay Consultant $10,000 at the beginning of each
month as compensation for these services. During 2007 this amount was
increased to $50,000 per quarter.
Equity
compensation — Subject to applicable laws, and the Company’s stock option plan,
and consistent with the Company’s usual option grant terms, the Company will
grant to Consultant options to purchase 1,213,930 shares of the Company’s common
stock. The options shall have an exercise price of $1.00 per share
and shall be exercisable for 7 years from the date of grant. These options
were granted to Consultant on May 1, 2006, and the Company calculated the
initial value of the options using the Black-Scholes model based on the
following assumptions: a risk-free rate of 5.15%, volatility of 137%, estimated
life of 10 years and a fair market value of $1.40 per share.
If the
Company sells shares of its common stock in a sale or sales cumulating at least
$3,000,000 net proceeds to the Company before May 1, 2007, and the average
per share price of such sale or sales (the “Average Price”) is less than $1.00,
then the Company shall issue additional options on substantially the same terms,
such that the total number of options, including previous options plus newly
issued options, times the Average Price equals $1,213,930. During
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no options related to this
provision granted, earned and vested.
The
options shall initially be unvested. The Company and Consultant anticipate that
vesting of options will continue in connection with employment. If such
employment is not entered into for any or no reason, then any options unvested
at the termination of this Agreement shall be forfeited to the
Company.
Option
Group A. Options equal to 5/7th’s of Consultant’s total number of options shall
vest monthly over five years, with the first such installment vesting
June 1, 2006. If at any time the number of options vested shall be
determined, the number vested according to the preceding monthly installment
schedule shall be rounded to the nearest whole number of options. As
of December 31, 2007, 288,715 of these options have vested and the Company has
recorded $171,414 as consultant expense. During
the year ended December 31, 2008, an additional 202,007 of these options vested
and the Company recorded $153,111 as consulting expense. As of
December 31, 2008, a total of 490,722 options have vested.
Option
Group B. Options equal to 1/7th of Consultant’s total number of options shall
vest on the close of a sale of equity in the Company to a Consultant Source
totaling not less than $1,000,000 net proceeds to the Company, or on the vesting
of Option Group C, whichever first occurs. A “Consultant Source” is a party that
Consultant first introduces to the Company (i.e., the Company had no
relationship with the party prior to Consultant’s introduction), and who
purchases equity in the Company in a transaction in which Consultant actively
participates in communications and negotiations, and who purchases equity in the
Company prior to the termination of this Agreement. If on May 1, 2009, this
condition has not been met, and this Agreement has not been terminated, then
Option Group B shall vest on May 1, 2009. During the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Consultant earned and was granted all of the
eligible options totaling 173,419 shares related to a Unit Subscription
Agreement as discussed in Note 12.
Option
Group C. Options equal to 1/7th of Consultant’s total number of options shall
vest on the date that the Company’s cumulative product sales total either
(a) 100,000 units of Falcon interface units (not including end effectors or
other accessories sold apart from a base unit) or (b) $20,000,000 in revenue to
the Company. If on May 1, 2009, this condition has not been met, and this
Agreement has not been terminated, then Option Group C shall vest on
May 1, 2009. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no
options related to Option Group C earned and vested.
F-18
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Bonus
compensation — The Company will pay to Consultant an amount equal to 4% of the
net proceeds to the Company of any sale of equity to a Consultant Source closing
before the termination of this Agreement. During the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, there was no bonus compensation earned.
The
Company will pay to Consultant an amount equal to 20% of the gross revenue to
the Company of any Consultant Sales, where Consultant Sales are sales of the
Company’s products to parties that were first introduced to the Company by
Consultant but only for so long as Consultant is actively promoting and driving
sales to the party and actively managing the relationship with the
party.
Although
this consulting agreement has not been signed, the Company has paid and
continues to pay Consultant under the terms of the agreement and the options
were considered granted May 1, 2006.
On May
24, 2007, the Company granted this Consultant an option to purchase Units
consisting of 147,059 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 147,059
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. The
option for each Unit has an exercise price of $1.02 per Unit which shall vest
49,020 on July 1, 2007; 49,020 on October 1, 2007; and 49,019 on January 1,
2008, which the Consultant has up to thirty (30) days to exercise such option
from each portion vested or otherwise forfeit such option. The option
related to these Units has been accounted for under EITF 96-18 whereby the
vested portion will be valued at the end of each reporting
period. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the
Company recorded $117,117 as an expense associated with the vested portion
of the options. Since the option is comprised of a share of common
stock and warrant, each component has been separately valued using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used for valuing
the common stock component under Black-Scholes are as follow: exercise price of
$1.02; stock price of $0.80 to $0.99; term of 1 month; volatility of 131% to
157%; and discount rate of 5%. The assumptions used for valuing the
warrant component under Black-Scholes are as follow: exercise price of $1.50;
stock price of $0.80 to $0.99; term of 3 years; volatility of 141% to 157%; and
discount rate of 5%. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the
Consultant only exercised the July 1, 2007 option for 49,020 shares and the
remaining unexercised options have expired.
In
February 2009, the Company terminated its relationship with AF Double Eagle, and
is currently negotiating settlement of this agreement.
Operating Lease
Agreements
The
Company currently has two operating leases relating to office and warehouse
space—the headquarters office in New Mexico and the logistics office in
California. The operating leases range from one year to five years
with monthly rental payments ranging from approximately $1,500 to
$8,300. The following is a schedule by years of the future minimum
rental payments required under these operating leases that have non-cancelable
lease terms:
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 129,883 | ||
2010
|
99,213 | |||
2011
|
99,213 | |||
2012
|
99,213 | |||
2013
|
8,268 | |||
Total
|
$ | 435,790 |
In
February 2009, the lease for the New Mexico location was terminated; refer to
Note 14 – Subsequent Events.
NOTE 12 — STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
On June
19, 2007, the Company’s stockholders approved an increase in the authorized
shares of common stock from 50,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares and
cancellation of the 4,000 authorized shares of Series A Preferred
Stock.
F-19
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Common Stock and Warrants
Sold with Conditional Exercise Price Adjustment
During
May 2007, the Company issued a total of 99,447 shares of common stock to seven
investors pursuant to provisions within their investment subscription agreements
related to the April, August and September 2006 issuances which provide for
additional shares to be issued as an anti-dilutive measure which terminated in
April 2007. These shares issued pursuant to the anti-dilutive measure were
accounted for as additional shares issued as part of the overall original sale
of stock related to the investment subscription agreement during 2006. The par
value of the 99,447 shares of common stock was recorded as a reduction to
additional paid-in capital.
Sale of Common Stock and
Warrant
During
January 2007, the Company sold 500,000 shares of common stock and warrants for
500,000 shares of common stock to 8 investors for a total of
$500,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share and
life of five years.
During
August 2007, the Company sold 250,000 shares of common stock and warrants for
62,500 shares of common stock to one investor for a total of $250,000. The
Company paid $15,000 in offering costs associated with the sale and received net
proceeds of $235,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.50 per share and
life of five years.
Unit Subscription
Agreement
On March 5, 2007, the Company entered into a Unit Subscription Agreement (the “Agreement”)
with 42 accredited investors (the
“Purchasers”) pursuant to which the Company issued and sold $9,000,000 of Units, at
a price of one dollar per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of common stock,
and one five-year warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise
price of $1.50. Accordingly, an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of its common
stock, and warrants to purchase 9,000,000 shares of common stock were issued
(the “Financing”). The Financing closed on March 5, 2007. Under the terms
of the Unit Subscription Agreement the Company may sell an additional 1,000,000
Units for $1,000,000 to a strategic investor, of which the Company closed on the
sale of 580,000 units for $580,000 on May 11, 2007. Gross proceeds from the Financing to
the Company were
$9,000,000, of which $320,010 was paid to certain individuals who
served as placement agents for the transaction and approximately $50,000 was
paid to counsel for the Purchasers in connection with the
transaction. In addition, the Company had netted a
previously capitalized deferred offering cost totaling $54,354 towards the gross
proceeds from the Financing. The Company granted warrants to
purchase 320,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.50 to
certain individuals who served as placement agents in the financing and options
to purchase 173,419 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 to AF
Double Eagle upon the closing of the Financing. These warrants and options have
been accounted for as related offering costs. Mr. Tom Anderson, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, invested
$25,000 in the Financing.
As part of the terms of the Agreement,
the Company entered into an Investor Rights
Agreement among the Purchasers pursuant to which the Company has agreed to file a registration
statement to register for resale of the shares of common stock sold in the
Financing, including the shares of common stock underlying the warrants, within
55 days following the closing of the Financing. Subject to certain
exceptions, in the event the registration statement is not filed within such
55 day period or does not become effective within certain time periods set
forth in the Investor Rights Agreement, the Company would be required to pay each purchaser
in the Financing an amount in cash equal to 0.0333% of the sum of (i) the
purchase amount paid by the Purchaser and (ii) the amount paid upon
exercise of the warrants for each day the filing or effectiveness of the
registration statement is delayed and, pursuant to the terms of the warrants,
the Purchasers would be entitled to exercise their warrants pursuant to a
cashless exercise formula. In addition, the Company has agreed not to grant any
registration rights that are senior to the registration rights of the Purchasers
for a period of two years from the closing date without the prior written
consent of a majority of
the Purchasers. The Company filed a Form SB-2 registration statement
as required by the Agreement on May 24, 2007 and it became effective on June 19,
2007 within the required timeline of the Agreement.
Stock
Options
In March
2004, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan which was then amended in February 2007 increasing the number of shares of
common stock reserved under the plan from 3,500,000 shares to 7,500,000 shares.
The Company has issued options to purchase shares of common stock to employees
and various consultants for payment of services.
F-20
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
Option
activity during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 is summarized in the
following table:
Shares
Under Option
|
Price
per Share
|
Weighted-AverageExercise Price
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding at 12/31/06
|
11,417,099 | $ | 0.01-$1.20 | $ | 0.47 | |||||||
Granted
|
859,118 | $ | 0.89-$1.02 | $ | 0.90 | |||||||
Exercised
|
(98,040 | ) | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.02 | ||||||
Canceled
|
(157,059 | ) | $ | 1.01-$1.02 | $ | 1.02 | ||||||
Options
outstanding at 12/31/07
|
12,021,118 | $ | 0.01-$1.20 | $ | 0.53 | |||||||
Granted
|
579,500 | $ | 0.50-$1.20 | $ | 0.68 | |||||||
Exercised
|
(56,519 | ) | $ | 0.66-$1.02 | $ | 0.97 | ||||||
Canceled
|
(269,500 | ) | $ | 0.66-$1.20 | $ | 0.94 | ||||||
Options
outstanding at 12/31/08
|
12,274,599 | $ | 0.01-$1.20 | $ | 0.51 | |||||||
Exercisable
at 12/31/07
|
10,709,078 | $ | 0.01-$1.20 | $ | 0.46 | |||||||
Exercisable
at 12/31/08
|
9,996966 | $ | 0.01-$1.20 | $ | 0.42 |
The
following summarizes certain information regarding outstanding options December
31, 2008:
Outstanding
|
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
Price
|
Number
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||||||
$
0.01
|
284,911 | $ | 0.01 | 1.63 | 284,911 | $ | 0.01 | |||||||||||||
$
0.05
|
4,600,000 | $ | 0.05 | 3.45 | 4,600,000 | $ | 0.05 | |||||||||||||
$
0.50
|
361,364 | $ | 0.50 | 9.82 | 361,364 | $ | 0.50 | |||||||||||||
$
0.66
|
2,994,394 | $ | 0.66 | 5.45 | 2,508,394 | $ | 0.66 | |||||||||||||
$
0.89
|
154,000 | $ | 0.89 | 9.01 | 45,459 | $ | 0.89 | |||||||||||||
$
0.90
|
1,500,000 | $ | 0.90 | 7.95 | 1,250,000 | $ | 0.90 | |||||||||||||
$
0.95
|
120,000 | $ | 0.95 | 8.80 | 68,000 | $ | 0.95 | |||||||||||||
$
1.00
|
1,465,930 | $ | 1.00 | 7.32 | 446,838 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
$
1.01
|
725,000 | $ | 1.01 | 8.19 | 393,000 | $ | 1.01 | |||||||||||||
$
1.03
|
25,000 | $ | 1.03 | 9.39 | - | $ | 1.03 | |||||||||||||
$
1.05
|
5,000 | $ | 1.05 | 9.38 | - | $ | 1.05 | |||||||||||||
$
1.06
|
4,000 | $ | 1.06 | 9.35 | 4,000 | $ | 1.06 | |||||||||||||
$
1.18
|
5,000 | $ | 1.18 | 9.31 | 5,000 | $ | 1.18 | |||||||||||||
$
1.20
|
30,000 | $ | 1.20 | 7.67 | 30,000 | $ | 1.20 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
12,274,599 | $ | 0.51 | 5.53 | 9,996,966 | $ | 0.42 |
Warrants
A summary
of the status of the total number of warrants as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and changes during the periods then ended is presented in the
tables below:
December
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Wtd
Avg
Ex
Price
|
Shares
|
|
Wtd
Avg
Ex
Price
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
14,975,245 | $ | 1.52 | 5,276,225 | $ | 1.40 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
7,033,501 | 0.98 | 10,444,020 | 1.52 | ||||||||||||
Note
Conversion
|
36,450 | 1.50 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(135,000 | ) | 0.50 | (415,000 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(112,500 | ) | 0.80 | (330,000 | ) | 1.00 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of year
|
21,797,696 | 1.35 | 14,975,245 | 1.52 | ||||||||||||
Exercisable
at end of year
|
21,797,696 | 1.35 | 14,975,245 | 1.52 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average fair value of warrants granted
|
$ | 1.35 | $ | 1.52 |
F-21
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
A summary
of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2008, the range of exercise prices,
the weighted-average exercise price, the weighted-average remaining contractual
life, the amount of warrants currently exercisable and the weighted-average
exercise price of warrants currently exercisable is as follows:
Warrants
Outstanding
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Range
of Exercise
Prices
|
Number
Outstanding
at 12/31/2008
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Exercisable
at
12/31/2008
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||||
$0.26
to $0.50
|
300,000 | 4.64 | $ | 0.50 | 300,000 | $ | 0.50 | |||||||||||||
$0.51
to $1.00
|
8,394,501 | 5.04 | 0.98 | 8,394,501 | 0.98 | |||||||||||||||
$1.01
to $2.00
|
13,103,195 | 5.65 | 1.60 | 13,103,195 | 1.60 | |||||||||||||||
$0.26
to $2.00
|
21,797,696 | 21,797,696 |
NOTE 13 — RELATED
PARTIES
On
February 18, 2004, the Company granted to a significant shareholder, for future
services, 125,000 options to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.66
per share. The options have a 5-year annual vesting provision. Options granted
to consultants are valued each reporting period to determine the amount to be
recorded as consultant expense in the respective period. As the options vest,
they will be valued one last time on the vesting date and an adjustment will be
recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the current
value on date of vesting. At December 31, 2008, the Company
calculated the value of the options using the Black-Scholes model based on the
following assumptions: a risk-free rate of 2.24%, volatility of 118%, estimated
life of 10 years and a fair market value of $0.50 per share. At March 31, 2004,
the Company calculated the initial value of the options using the Black-Scholes
model based on the following assumptions: a risk-free rate of 4.05%, volatility
of 91%, estimated life of 10 years and a fair market value of $1.00 per share.
The vesting schedule is prorated over the reporting period, and $12,164
and $25,995, respectively, was recorded as consultant expense during the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
In March
2004, Normandie New Mexico Corporation, which is owned by the former Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) of Manhattan Scientific (a significant shareholder) who
is also a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, entered into an agreement
with the Company to provide consulting services in relation to business
development and marketing support. Fees per the agreement are $6,250 per month.
For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had paid $56,250 and
$140,625, respectively, and recorded expenses totaling $75,000 and $75,000,
respectively, for these services. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the Company owed $25,000 and $6,250, respectively, to Normandie New Mexico under
the agreement.
On June
10, 2004, the Company granted 250,000 options to purchase common stock to one of
the member of the Company’s Board of Directors for future consulting services at
an exercise price of $0.66 per share. The options have a 5-year annual vesting
provision. At June 30, 2004, the Company calculated the initial value of these
options using the Black-Scholes model based on the following assumptions: a
risk-free rate of 4.81%, volatility of 100%, estimated life of 10 years and a
fair market value of $1.00 per share. At December 31, 2008, the Company
calculated the value of the options using the Black-Scholes model based on the
following assumptions: a risk-free rate of 2.24%, volatility of 118%, estimated
life of 10 years and a fair market value of $0.50 per share. The vesting
schedule is prorated over the reporting period, and approximately $36,470
and $35,204, respectively, was recorded as consulting expense during the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
On
March 9, 2006 the Company granted 250,000 options to purchase common stock
to an employee, who is the brother of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, at
an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options have a ten year term, and a
vesting schedule of 50,000 shares per year beginning March 9, 2007. At
March 9, 2006, the Company calculated the initial value of the options
using the Black-Scholes model based on the following assumptions: a risk-free
rate of 4.86%, volatility of 36%, estimated life of 10 years and a fair
market value of $1.00 per share. The vesting schedule is
prorated over the reporting period, and approximately $28,539 and $28,539,
respectively, was recorded as consulting expense during the years ended December
31, 2008 and 2007.
F-22
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
In
November 2006, the Company granted 1,500,000 options to purchase common stock to
one of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors for future consulting
services at an exercise price of $0.90 per share. The options have a 2-year
annual vesting provision which 750,000 these options vested immediately. At
December 31, 2006, the Company calculated the initial value of these options
using the Black-Scholes model based on the following assumptions: a risk-free
rate of 5.15%, volatility of 146%, estimated life of 10 years and a fair market
value of $1.05 per share. At December 31, 2008, the Company calculated the value
of the options using the Black-Scholes model based on the following assumptions:
a risk-free rate of 2.24%, volatility of 118%, estimated life of 10 years and a
fair market value of $0.50 per share. The vesting schedule is prorated over the
reporting period, and approximately $115,758 and $461,594, respectively, was
recorded as consultant expense during the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007.
On July
23, 2007, the Company entered into a perpetual employment agreement with an
individual whom is related with the Chief Executive Officer through
family marriage. Under the agreement is entitled to an annual base
salary of $68,000 per year and cash bonus to be determined by the Company, is
subject to confidentiality provisions and is entitled to a severance equal to
this employee’s base salary for a two week period if this employee is terminated
by the Company without cause. Additionally, the employment agreement
granted this employee an option for 25,000 shares of common stock with an
exercise price of $0.95 per share which vests over a five-year
period. In October 2008, this employee was terminated, and 15,000 of
the options were cancelled. As of December 31, 2008, there is an
accrual of $2,672 for the severance pay that has not yet been
issued.
One of
the members of the Company’s Board of Directors provides legal services to
Company. Total legal expense incurred by the Company for such legal
services by this director totaled $139,516
and $196,711 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. In 2007,
the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 12,500
shares of common stock in satisfaction of $25,000 in accrued liabilities
incurred from the previous year. Additionally, in 2007, the Company
issued 25,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of
common stock in satisfaction of expenses totaling $25,000 incurred in
2007. At the beginning of 2008, the Company granted this board
member options to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price
of $.89 per share for service performed and to be performed in relation to the
Company’s patents. As of December 31, 2008, 8,709
options had vested and the Company recorded $4,990
in expense related to these vested options.
In
September 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Winning Performance,
Inc to perform services as a part-time controller. For the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had paid $116,933 and $89,482,
respectively, and recorded expenses totaling $142,384 and $82,175, respectively,
for these services. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company
owed $31,076 and $5,625, respectively, to Winning Performance, Inc.
NOTE
14 —
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In
January 2009, the Company received $100,000 related to a promissory note secured
with the Company’s intellectual property, with an annual interest rate of eight
percent (8%), principal and interest due at maturity, and a maturity date of
December 4, 2009. Additionally,
the Company issued the note holder a detachable warrant for 100,000 shares of
our common stock, which will be accounted for as additional consideration to the
promissory note under Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 14. If the
note is not paid back by the maturity date, then Novint will have the right but
not the obligation to refinanance the note with a new note equaling the interest
and principal from the first note, with a new maturity date of December 4, 2010
and an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%). The new note is convertible
into common stock at a rate of $0.50/share.
In
February and March 2009, the Company received $220,000 for three promissory note
totaling $275,000, with 150% warrant coverage. The exercise price on the
warrants was $1.00/share with a 5 year term. The notes are secured with the
Company’s assets and intellectual property, no stated interest rate, with
principal and interest due February 2010. These notes are considered original
issue discount notes whereby the discount will be amortized over the lives of
the notes. If the notes are prepaid, the exercise price of the warrants will
adjust to the fair market value of Novint’s stock at the time of prepayment,
subject to a floor of $0.02 and a ceiling of $1.00. If an investor sells any
shares of our common stock during 120 days prior to the maturity date of the
note, the strike price will automatically reset to $2.00. If the notes are not
paid back by the maturity date, then Novint will have the right but not the
obligation to refinanance the notes with new notes equaling the principal anc
accrued interest from the first note, with a new maturity date one year
later and an annual interest rate of five percent (5%). The new note is
convertible into common stock at a rate of $0.0625/share on the principal
balance only. The conversion rate is subjet to change based upon the privisionin
the note.
In
February 2009, the Company terminated many of its employees in order to reduce
expenses. They have retained the personnel necessary to continue key
operations to maintain sales.
F-23
Novint
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2008 AND 2007
In
February 2009, the Company received a notice of breach of one of their licensing
agreements. The Company does not plan to cure this breach. The
remaining obligation under this agreement of $200,000 related to the breach will
remain as a liability, and all of the prepaid royalties were expensed in
2008.
In
February 2009, the Board of Directors granted employees 5,850,000 options to
purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.10 per share as
compensation for prior services. The options vest upon grant, and the
expense for these options, totaling $582,102, was recorded in the year ended
December 31, 2008. The Board of Directors also granted consultants and
directors 1,700,000 options to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $.10 per share as compensation for future services. These options
vest equally every six months for two years following the grant.
Also in
February 2009, the Board of Directors granted 100,000 options to purchase shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share to a consultant for past
services, and 250,000 restricted shares of common stock to a consultant for
consulting services.
On March
1, 2009, the Company signed a lease termination agreement for the headquarter
office. The Company paid $30,000, forfeited the security deposit of
approximately $11,000, transferred title to assets (office furniture and
leasehold improvements) with a net book value of approximately $23,000, and will
issue 400,000 shares of common stock in exchange for terminations of the
original lease obligation and use of one small office and 1500 square feet of
storage rent free for at least six months.
In August
2008, the Company entered into a licensing agreement for several games, with a
guaranteed minimum royalty of $100,000. In March 2009, the Company
signed an amendment to reduce the minimum royalty to $15,000 for a total of two
games. The Company has accrued for the $15,000 as of December 31,
2008. This amount was paid in March 2009.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NOVINT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
|||
Dated:
April 15, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Tom Anderson
|
|
Tom
Anderson,
|
|||
President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
|
In
accordance with the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
NAME
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
||
/s/
Tom Anderson
|
Chairman
of the Board, Principal Executive Officer, and Principal Financial
|
April
15, 2009
|
||
Tom
Anderson
|
and Accounting Officer | |||
/s/
Marvin Maslow
|
Director
|
April
15, 2009
|
||
Marvin
Maslow
|
||||
/s/
V. Gerald Grafe
|
Director
|
April
15, 2009
|
||
V.
Gerald Grafe
|
36