DXP ENTERPRISES INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-Q
(Mark One)
|
[X]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934. For the quarterly period ended June 30,
2009
|
or
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
|
For
the transition period from
|
to
|
Commission
file number 0-21513
DXP
Enterprises, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
|
76-0509661
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
|
7272
Pinemont, Houston, Texas 77040
|
(713)
996-4700
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code.
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [
] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
[ ] Accelerated
filer [X]
Non-accelerated
filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company) Smaller
reporting company [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
Number of
shares of registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of August 10,
2009: 12,880,852.
PART
I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1:
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DXP
ENTERPRISES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|||
June
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
||
ASSETS
|
(unaudited)
|
||
Current
assets:
|
|||
Cash
|
$ 2,470
|
$ 5,698
|
|
Trade
accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful
accounts
|
|||
of
$3,710 in 2009 and $3,494 in 2008
|
77,851
|
101,191
|
|
Inventories,
net
|
102,876
|
119,097
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
3,763
|
2,851
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
5,903
|
3,863
|
|
Total
current assets
|
192,863
|
232,700
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
19,422
|
20,331
|
|
Goodwill
|
100,001
|
98,718
|
|
Other
intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $13,218 in
2009
and
$9,605 in 2008
|
41,614
|
45,227
|
|
Other
assets
|
707
|
880
|
|
Total
assets
|
$ 354,607
|
$ 397,856
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
$ 13,817
|
$ 13,965
|
|
Trade
accounts payable
|
42,038
|
57,539
|
|
Accrued
wages and benefits
|
8,761
|
12,869
|
|
Customer
advances
|
2,119
|
2,719
|
|
Federal
income taxes payable
|
5,198
|
7,894
|
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
4,223
|
8,660
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
76,156
|
103,646
|
|
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
131,150
|
154,591
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
11,004
|
9,419
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
12
|
12
|
|
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||
Series
A preferred stock, 1/10th
vote per share; $1.00 par value;
liquidation
preference of $100 per share ($112 at June 30, 2009);
1,000,000
shares authorized; 1,122 shares issued and outstanding
|
1
|
1
|
|
Series
B convertible preferred stock, 1/10th
vote per share; $1.00
par
value; $100 stated value; liquidation preference of $100 per
share
($1,500 at June 30, 2009); 1,000,000 shares
authorized;
15,000 shares
issued and outstanding
|
15
|
15
|
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
12,869,746
in 2009 and 12,863,304 in 2008 shares outstanding
|
128
|
128
|
|
Paid-in
capital
|
56,744
|
56,206
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
79,858
|
74,559
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(461)
|
(721)
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
136,285
|
130,188
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ 354,607
|
$ 397,856
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
|
2
DXP
ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
(Restated)
|
2009
|
2008
(Restated)
|
||||
Sales
|
$ 144,374
|
$ 187,802
|
$ 301,978
|
$ 356,301
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
102,990
|
135,926
|
214,520
|
258,479
|
|||
Gross
profit
|
41,384
|
51,876
|
87,458
|
97,822
|
|||
Selling,
general and
administrative
expense
|
36,263
|
40,391
|
75,645
|
75,769
|
|||
Operating
income
|
5,121
|
11,485
|
11,813
|
22,053
|
|||
Other
income
|
48
|
27
|
62
|
40
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
(1,335)
|
(1,176)
|
(2,788)
|
(2,559)
|
|||
Income
before income taxes
|
3,834
|
10,336
|
9,087
|
19,534
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
1,668
|
3,963
|
3,749
|
7,722
|
|||
Net
income
|
2,166
|
6,373
|
5,338
|
11,812
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividend
|
(23)
|
(22)
|
(38)
|
(45)
|
|||
Net
income attributable to
common
shareholders
|
$ 2,143
|
$ 6,351
|
$ 5,300
|
$ 11,767
|
|||
Basic
income per share
|
$ 0.16
|
$ 0.49
|
$ 0.40
|
$ 0.92
|
|||
Weighted
average common
shares
outstanding
|
13,103
|
12,857
|
13,091
|
12,857
|
|||
Diluted
income per share
|
$ 0.15
|
$ 0.46
|
$ 0.38
|
$ 0.85
|
|||
Weighted
average common and common
equivalent
shares outstanding
|
13,977
|
13,837
|
13,965
|
13,837
|
|||
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
3
DXP
ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN
THOUSANDS)
SIX
MONTHS ENDED
|
|||
JUNE
30
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|||
Net
income
|
$ 5,338
|
$ 11,812
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided
|
|||
by
operating activities – net of acquisitions
|
|||
Depreciation
|
2,187
|
2,036
|
|
Amortization
of intangibles
|
3,613
|
2,460
|
|
Compensation
expense from restricted stock
|
740
|
454
|
|
Tax
benefit related to vesting of restricted stock
|
23
|
-
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
(496)
|
(113)
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of
assets
and liabilities acquired in business combinations:
|
|||
Trade
accounts receivable
|
23,340
|
(15,532)
|
|
Inventories
|
16,220
|
(312)
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(1,708)
|
(1,896)
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(27,217)
|
6,500
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
22,040
|
5,409
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(1,278)
|
(3,202)
|
|
Purchase
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(338)
|
(3,822)
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,616)
|
(7,024)
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||
Proceeds
from debt
|
59,369
|
25,223
|
|
Principal
payments on revolving line of credit and other long-term
debt
|
(82,960)
|
(21,581)
|
|
Dividends
paid in cash
|
(38)
|
(45)
|
|
Tax
benefit related to vesting of restricted stock
|
(23)
|
-
|
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(23,652)
|
3,597
|
|
INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH
|
(3,228)
|
1,982
|
|
CASH
AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
5,698
|
3,978
|
|
CASH
AT END OF PERIOD
|
$ 2,470
|
$ 5,960
|
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
4
DXP
ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(IN
THOUSANDS)
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||
Net
income
|
$2,166
|
$6,373
|
$5,338
|
$11,812
|
|||
Gain
(loss) from interest rate swap, net of income taxes
|
153
|
390
|
260
|
(210)
|
|||
Comprehensive
income
|
$2,319
|
$6,763
|
$5,598
|
$11,602
|
|||
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
5
DXP
ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions
to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
have been omitted. DXP Enterprises, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the
“Company” or “DXP”) believes that the presentations and disclosures herein are
adequate to make the information not misleading. The condensed consolidated
financial statements reflect all elimination entries and adjustments (consisting
of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the
interim periods.
The
results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the results of operations to be expected for the full year. These condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
NOTE
2: THE COMPANY
DXP, a
Texas corporation, was incorporated on July 26, 1996 to be the successor to
SEPCO Industries, Inc. (“SEPCO”). The Company is organized into two segments:
Maintenance, Repair and Operating (“MRO”) and Electrical
Contractor.
NOTE
3: NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements;
rather, it applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements. The provisions of this statement are to be applied
prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is
initially applied, with any transition adjustment recognized as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The
provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for the fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-2, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods
within those years for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). See Note 10 “Fair Value of Financial Assets
and Liabilities” for additional information on the adoption of SFAS
157.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”
(“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed
and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the
acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable
assets acquired. In addition, immediate expense recognition is required for
transaction costs. SFAS 141(R) is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and adoption is prospective
only. As such, if the Company enters into any business combinations after
adoption of SFAS 141(R), a transaction may significantly affect the Company’s
financial position and earnings, but, not cash flows, compared to the Company’s
past acquisitions.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”
(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of
Statement 133 to provide a better understanding of how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for, and their effect on an entity’s financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 also requires
disclosure
6
of the
fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular
format. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, or the
Company’s quarter ended March 31, 2009. As this pronouncement is only
disclosure-related, it does not and will not have an impact on the financial
position and results of operations.
In April
2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful
Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends
the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). It is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied
prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective
date.
Early
adoption is not permitted. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded
disclosure related to the determination of useful lives for intangible assets
and should be applied to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent
to, the effective date. The impact of FSP FAS 142-3 will depend on
the size and nature of acquisitions completed by the Company on or after January
1, 2009.
In June
2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities” (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that
unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating
securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share using
the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 on a retrospective basis and was adopted by
the Company in the first quarter of 2009. The Company has granted awards of
restricted stock that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends which are
considered participating securities under FSP EITF 03-6-1. Because
these awards are participating securities under FSP EITF 03-6-1, the Company is
required to include these instruments in the calculation of earnings per share
using the two-class method. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 reduced
basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2008 by $0.01, $0.01, $0.01 and $0.01, respectively. Basic earnings per
share, diluted earnings per share, weighted average common shares outstanding
and weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding for 2008
have been restated.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” which
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 provides guidance on the
period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting
entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential
recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under
which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 during the second quarter of
2009, and its application had no impact on the Company’s consolidated condensed
financial statements. The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date
the accompanying financial statements were issued on August 10,
2009.
NOTE
4: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock
Options as of the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2009
No future
grants will be made under the Company’s stock option plans. No grants
of stock options have been made by the Company since July 1, 2005. As
of June 30, 2009, all outstanding options were non-qualified stock
options.
The
following table summarizes stock options outstanding and changes during the six
month period ended June 30, 2009:
7
Options
Outstanding and Exercisable
|
|||||||
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in
years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||
Options
outstanding
at
December 31, 2008
|
58,000
|
$ 2.33
|
4.5
|
$ 712,000
|
|||
Granted
|
-
|
||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
||||||
Options
outstanding and
exercisable
at June 30, 2009
|
58,000
|
$ 2.33
|
4.0
|
$ 530,000
|
The total
intrinsic value, or the difference between the exercise price and the market
price on the date of exercise, of all options exercised during the six month
period ended June 30, 2009, was zero. Cash received from stock
options exercised during the six month period ended June 30, 2009 was
zero.
Stock
options outstanding and currently exercisable at June 30, 2009 are as
follows:
Options
Outstanding and Exercisable
|
||||||
Range
of
exercise
prices
|
Number
of Options
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life
(in
years)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||
$1.25
|
18,000
|
0.8
|
$1.25
|
|||
$2.26
- $3.36
|
40,000
|
5.4
|
$2.81
|
|||
58,000
|
4.0
|
$2.33
|
Restricted
Stock.
Under the
restricted stock plan approved by our shareholders in July 2005 (the “Restricted
Stock Plan”), directors, consultants and employees may be awarded shares of
DXP’s common stock. The shares of restricted stock granted to
employees as of June 30, 2009 vest 33% each year for three years after the grant
date, 25% each year for four years after the grant date, 20% each year for five
years after the grant date or 10% each year for ten years after the grant
date. The Restricted Stock Plan provides that on each July 1 during
the term of the plan, each non-employee director of DXP will be granted the
number of whole shares calculated by dividing $75,000 by the closing price of
the common stock on such July 1. The shares of restricted stock granted to
non-employee directors of DXP vest one year after the grant date. The
fair value of restricted stock awards is measured based upon the closing prices
of DXP’s common stock on the grant dates and is generally recognized as
compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards.
The
following table provides certain information regarding the shares authorized and
outstanding under the Restricted Stock Plan at June 30, 2009:
Number
of shares authorized for grants
|
600,000
|
Number
of shares granted
|
345,038
|
Number
of shares forfeited
|
20,923
|
Number
of shares available for future grants
|
275,885
|
Weighted-average
grant price of granted shares
|
$ 15.89
|
8
Changes
in restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were as
follows:
Number
of
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
|
||
Unvested
at December 31, 2008
|
215,250
|
$
15.91
|
|
Granted
|
39,016
|
$
16.87
|
|
Forfeited
|
(20,923)
|
$
12.76
|
|
Vested
|
(6,442)
|
$
10.31
|
|
Unvested
at June 30, 2009
|
226,901
|
$
16.52
|
Compensation
expense, associated with restricted stock, recognized in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $740,000 and $454,000,
respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense under the Restricted
Stock Plan was $2,922,000 and $3,092,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. As of June 30, 2009, the weighted average period over
which the unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized is 30
months.
NOTE
5: INVENTORY
The
carrying values of inventories are as follows (in thousands):
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||
Finished
goods
|
$ 101,959
|
$
117,582
|
|
Work
in process
|
917
|
1,515
|
|
Inventories
|
$ 102,876
|
$
119,097
|
Note
6: GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The
changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangibles during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
Total
|
Goodwill
|
Other
Intangibles
|
|||
Balance
as of December 31, 2008
|
$ 143,945
|
$ 98,718
|
$ 45,227
|
||
Acquired
during the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
Adjustments
to prior year estimates
|
1,283
|
1,283
|
-
|
||
Amortization
|
(3,613)
|
-
|
(3,613)
|
||
Balance
as of June 30, 2009
|
$ 141,615
|
$ 100,001
|
$ 41,614
|
A summary
of amortizable intangible assets follows (in thousands):
As
of June 30, 2009
|
As
of December 31, 2008
|
||||||
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
||||
Vendor
agreements
|
$ 2,496
|
$ (644)
|
$ 2,496
|
$ (582)
|
|||
Customer
relationships
|
50,416
|
(11,545)
|
50,416
|
(8,289)
|
|||
Non-compete
agreements
|
1,920
|
(1,029)
|
1,920
|
(734)
|
|||
Total
|
$ 54,832
|
$ (13,218)
|
$ 54,832
|
$ (9,605)
|
The $1.3
million increase in goodwill from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 primarily
results from a reduction in the value of acquired inventories for Rocky Mtn.
Supply, Inc., which was acquired during 2008. Other intangible assets
are generally amortized on a straight line basis over the useful lives of the
assets. All goodwill and other intangible assets pertain to the MRO
segment.
9
NOTE
7. EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share for the periods indicated.
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||
June
30
|
June
30
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
(Restated)
|
2009
|
2008
(Restated)
|
||||
Basic:
|
|||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
13,103,396
|
12,856,596
|
13,091,041
|
12,856,596
|
|||
Net
income
|
$ 2,166,000
|
$ 6,373,000
|
$ 5,338,000
|
$
11,812,000
|
|||
Convertible
preferred stock dividend
|
(23,000)
|
(22,000)
|
(38,000)
|
(45,000)
|
|||
Net
income attributable to
common
shareholders
|
$ 2,143,000
|
$ 6,351,000
|
$ 5,300,000
|
$
11,767,000
|
|||
Per
share amount
|
$ 0.16
|
$ 0.49
|
$ 0.40
|
$ 0.92
|
|||
Diluted:
|
|||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
13,103,396
|
12,856,596
|
13,091,041
|
12,856,596
|
|||
Net
effect of dilutive stock options –
based
on the treasury stock method
|
34,018
|
140,551
|
33,891
|
140,337
|
|||
Assumed
conversion of convertible
preferred
stock
|
840,000
|
840,000
|
840,000
|
840,000
|
|||
Total
|
13,977,414
|
13,837,147
|
13,964,932
|
13,836,933
|
|||
Net
income attributable to
common
shareholders
|
$ 2,143,000
|
$ 6,351,000
|
$ 5,300,000
|
$
11,767,000
|
|||
Convertible
preferred stock dividend
|
23,000
|
22,000
|
38,000
|
45,000
|
|||
Net
income for diluted earnings per share
|
$ 2,166,000
|
$ 6,373,000
|
$ 5,338,000
|
$
11,812,000
|
|||
Per
share amount
|
$ 0.15
|
$ 0.46
|
$ 0.38
|
$ 0.85
|
NOTE
8: SEGMENT REPORTING
The MRO
Segment is engaged in providing maintenance, repair and operating products,
equipment and integrated services, including engineering expertise and logistics
capabilities, to industrial customers. The Company provides a wide
range of MRO products in the fluid handling equipment, bearing, power
transmission equipment, general mill, safety supply and electrical products
categories. The Electrical Contractor segment sells to electrical
contractors a broad range of electrical products, such as wire conduit, wiring
devices, electrical fittings and boxes, signaling devices, heaters, tools,
switch gear, lighting, lamps, tape, lugs, wire nuts, batteries, fans and
fuses.
The high
degree of integration of the Company’s operations necessitates the use of a
substantial number of allocations and apportionments in the determination of
business segment information. Sales are shown net of intersegment
eliminations. All business segments operate primarily in the
United States.
10
Financial
information relating the Company’s segments is as follows:
Three
Months ended June 30,
|
Six
Months ended June 30,
|
||||||||||
MRO
|
Electrical
Contractor
|
Total
|
MRO
|
Electrical
Contractor
|
Total
|
||||||
2008
|
|||||||||||
Sales
|
$ 186,823
|
$ 979
|
$ 187,802
|
$ 354,419
|
$ 1,882
|
$ 356,301
|
|||||
Operating
income
|
11,315
|
170
|
11,485
|
21,742
|
311
|
22,053
|
|||||
Income
before taxes
|
10,199
|
137
|
10,336
|
19,286
|
248
|
19,534
|
|||||
2009
|
|||||||||||
Sales
|
$ 143,666
|
$ 708
|
$ 144,374
|
$ 300,585
|
$ 1,393
|
$ 301,978
|
|||||
Operating
income
|
5,049
|
72
|
5,121
|
11,678
|
135
|
11,813
|
|||||
Income
before taxes
|
3,791
|
43
|
3,834
|
9,013
|
74
|
9,087
|
NOTE
9:
|
ACQUISITIONS
|
All of
the Company’s acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Revenues and expenses of the acquired businesses have
been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements beginning on
their respective dates of acquisition. The allocation of purchase
price to the acquired assets and liabilities is based on estimates of fair
market value and may be prospectively revised if and when the Company obtains
additional information concerning certain asset and liability valuations,
provided that such information is received no later than one year after the date
of acquisition.
On
February 1, 2008, DXP completed the acquisition of the business of Rocky Mtn.
Supply, Inc. DXP acquired this business to expand DXP’s geographic presence in
Colorado. DXP paid approximately $4.6 million, net of acquired cash,
for this business. The purchase price consisted of approximately $3.9
million in cash and $0.7 million in seller notes. The seller notes
bear interest at the rate of prime minus 1.75%. The cash portion was
funded by utilizing available capacity under DXP’s credit facility.
On August
28, 2008, DXP completed the acquisition of PFI, LLC. DXP acquired
this business to strengthen DXP’s expertise in the distribution of
fasteners. DXP paid $66.4 million in cash for this
business. The cash was funded by utilizing a new credit
facility.
On
December 1, 2008, DXP completed the acquisition of the business of Falcon
Pump. DXP acquired this business to strengthen DXP’s pump offering in
the Rocky Mountain area. DXP paid $3.1 million in cash, $0.8 million
in seller notes and up to $1.0 million in future payments contingent upon future
earnings of the acquired business. The seller notes bear interest at ninety-day
LIBOR plus 0.75%. The cash portion was funded using DXP’s credit
facility.
The
allocation of purchase price for all acquisitions completed since June 30, 2008
is preliminary in the June 30, 2009 consolidated balance sheets. The
initial purchase price allocations may be adjusted within one year of the
purchase date for changes in the estimates of the fair value of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed. The following table summarizes the estimated
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed since June 30, 2008
in connection with the acquisitions described above (in thousands):
Accounts
Receivable
|
$ 9,210
|
Inventory
|
24,422
|
Property
and equipment
|
2,625
|
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
44,657
|
Other
assets
|
274
|
Assets
acquired
|
81,188
|
Current
liabilities assumed
|
(5,165)
|
Non-current
liabilities assumed
|
(5,759)
|
Net
assets acquired
|
$ 70,264
|
11
The pro
forma unaudited results of operations for the Company on a consolidated basis
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008, assuming the
acquisitions completed in 2008 were consummated as of January 1, 2008 follows
(in thousands, except for per share data):
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|
Net
sales
|
$ 208,657
|
$ 398,915
|
Net
income
|
6,993
|
13,366
|
Per
share data
|
||
Basic
earnings
|
$0.54
|
$1.04
|
Diluted
earnings
|
$0.51
|
$0.97
|
NOTE
10: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As of
June 30, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB
28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (FSP FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1), which requires companies to disclose the fair value of
financial instruments within interim financial statements, adding to the current
requirement to provide those disclosures annually. Effective June 30,
2009, the required disclosures have been provided within this Note.
We
adopted SFAS 157 effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and
liabilities measured on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 applies to all financial
assets and financial liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair
value basis. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, which delayed the
effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008 for non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair value, as defined in SFAS
157, is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS 157 affects the fair value measurement of an interest
rate swap, to which the Company is a party, which must be classified in one of
the following categories:
Level
1 Inputs
These
inputs come from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities.
Level
2 Inputs
These
inputs are other than quoted prices that are observable for an asset or
liability. This includes: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other
means.
Level
3 Inputs
These are
unobservable inputs for the asset or liability which require the Company’s own
assumptions.
As
required by SFAS 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of the fair value of
assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy
levels.
The
following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments (an
interest rate swap) by SFAS 157 input levels as of June 30, 2009 (in
thousands):
12
Fair Value Measurement
|
|||||||
Description
(Liabilities)
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Current
liabilities -
other accrued liabilities
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 768
|
|
$ 768
|
Non-current
liabilities
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
Total
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 768
|
|
$ 768
|
The
following presents the changes in Level 3 liabilities for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
Interest
Rate Swap
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
||
Three
Months Ended June 30
|
|||
Fair
value at April 1
|
$ 1,023
|
$ 1,000
|
|
Realized
and unrealized (gains) losses
included
in other comprehensive income
|
(255)
|
(650)
|
|
Fair
value at June 30
|
$ 768
|
$ 350
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30
|
|||
Fair
value at January 1
|
$ 1,202
|
$ -
|
|
Realized
and unrealized (gains) losses
included
in other comprehensive income
|
(434)
|
350
|
|
Fair
value at June 30
|
$ 768
|
$ 350
|
To hedge
a portion of our floating rate debt, as of January 10, 2008, DXP entered into an
interest rate swap agreement with the lead bank of our
Facility. Through January 11, 2010, this interest rate swap
effectively fixes the interest rate on $40 million of floating rate LIBOR
borrowings under the Facility at one-month LIBOR of 3.68% plus the margin (1.50%
at June 30, 2009) in effect under the Facility. This swap is
designated as a fair value hedging instrument. Changes in the fair
value of the swap are included in other comprehensive income. See
Note 11 “Other Comprehensive Income” for gain and (loss), net of income taxes,
on the interest rate swap.
|
NOTE
11: OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
Other
comprehensive income generally represents all changes in shareholders’ equity
during the period, except those resulting from investments by, or distributions
to, shareholders. The Company has other comprehensive income related to changes
in interest rates in connection with an interest rate swap, which is recorded as
follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
June
30
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||
Net
income
|
$2,166
|
|
$6,373
|
$5,338
|
$11,812
|
||
Gain
(loss) from interest rate swap, net of income taxes
|
153
|
390
|
260
|
(210)
|
|||
Other
comprehensive income
|
$2,319
|
|
$6,763
|
$5,598
|
$11,602
|
At
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, the accumulated derivative loss, net of
income taxes, was $721,000 and $461,000, respectively.
|
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Impact
of Current Economic Conditions
|
As with
most businesses, our results of operations have been adversely impacted by
current economic conditions. If economic
conditions do not improve, we expect our results of operations will continue to
be adversely impacted. We will continue to look for opportunities to
reduce expenses and reduce debt.
13
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
||||||||
(in
thousands, except percentages and per share amounts)
|
|||||||||||||||
Sales
|
$144,374
|
100.0
|
$187,802
|
100.0
|
$301,978
|
100.0
|
$356,301
|
100.0
|
|||||||
Cost
of sales
|
102,990
|
71.3
|
135,926
|
72.4
|
214,520
|
71.0
|
258,479
|
72.5
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
41,384
|
28.7
|
51,876
|
27.6
|
87,458
|
29.0
|
97,822
|
27.5
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and
administrative
expense
|
36,263
|
25.1
|
40,391
|
21.5
|
75,645
|
25.1
|
75,769
|
21.3
|
|||||||
Operating
income
|
5,121
|
3.6
|
11,485
|
6.1
|
11,813
|
3.9
|
22,053
|
6.2
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,335)
|
(0.9)
|
(1,176)
|
(0.6)
|
(2,788)
|
(0.9)
|
(2,559)
|
(0.7)
|
|||||||
Other
income
|
48
|
-
|
27
|
-
|
62
|
-
|
40
|
-
|
|||||||
Income
before
income
taxes
|
3,834
|
2.7
|
10,336
|
5.5
|
9,087
|
3.0
|
19,534
|
5.5
|
|||||||
Provision
for
income
taxes
|
1,668
|
1.2
|
3,963
|
2.1
|
3,749
|
1.2
|
7,722
|
2.2
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$ 2,166
|
1.5
|
$ 6,3733
|
3.4
|
$ 5,338
|
1.8
|
11,812
|
3.3
|
|||||||
Per
share amounts
|
|||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings
per
share
|
$0.16
|
$0.49
|
$0.41
|
$0.92
|
|||||||||||
Diluted
earnings
per
share
|
$0.16
|
$0.46
|
$0.38
|
$0.85
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2008
SALES. Revenues
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $43.4 million, or 23.1% to
$144.4 million from $187.8 million for the same period in 2008. Sales for the
MRO Segment decreased $43.2 million, or 23.1%, to approximately $143.7 million
from $186.8 million for the same period in 2008. Sales by businesses acquired in
2008, on a same store sales basis, accounted for $12.0 million of 2009 sales for
the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding these sales by
the acquired businesses, sales for the MRO segment decreased
29.5%. This sales decrease is primarily due to a broad-based decrease
in sales of pumps, bearings, safety products and mill supplies resulting from
economic crisis in the United States. Sales for the Electrical
Contractor segment for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $0.3
million, or 27.7%, to $0.7 million from $1.0 million for the same period in 2008
resulting from the decline in the economy. Sales of commodity and
specialty type electrical products decreased.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 1.1%
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, to $28.7% from 27.6% for the same
period in 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the MRO
segment increased to 28.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, from 27.6%
for the same period in 2008. This increase is primarily the result of
increased gross profit as a percentage of sales on sales of supply chain
services and MRO products and services in 2009 as compared to 2008 combined with
the effect of the two businesses acquired after March 31, 2008 having a higher
gross profit percentage than the remainder of DXP. Gross profit as a
percentage of sales for the Electrical Contractor segment decreased to 33.8% for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, from 36.3% for the same period in 2008.
This decrease resulted from sales of higher margin specialty-type electrical
products decreasing more than sales of commodity products
decreased.
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by approximately $4.1
million, to $36.3 million from $40.4 million for the same period in 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expense associated with the two businesses
acquired after March 31, 2008, on a same store basis, accounted for $3.8 million
of the 2009 expense. On a same stores basis, selling,
general and administrative expense decreased approximately $7.9
million. This decrease primarily
14
resulted
from reduced salaries, incentive compensation, employee benefits, travel
expenses and transportation expense compared to the same period in
2008. As a percentage of revenue, the 2009 expense increased by
approximately 3.6%, to 25.1%, from 21.5% for the three months ended June 30,
2008. This increase is primarily the result of sales decreasing more
than selling, general and administrative expenses decreased on a same store
basis.
OPERATING
INCOME. Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased 55.4% to $5.1 million from $11.5 million for the same period in
2008. Operating income for the MRO segment decreased 55.4%, to $5.0
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, from $11.3 million for the
same period in 2008 as a result of a $10.4 million decrease in gross profit,
partially offset by a $4.1 million decrease in selling, general and
administrative expense. Operating income for the Electrical
Contractor segment for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 57.7%, to
$0.1 million from $0.2 million for the same period in 2008 primarily as a result
of decreased gross profit due to decreased sales.
INTEREST
EXPENSE. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009
increased by 13.5% to $1.3 million from $1.2 million for the same period in
2008. This increase resulted from increased debt used to fund
acquisitions completed in 2008, which was partially offset by decreased market
interest rates on floating rate debt.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2008
SALES. Revenues
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $54.3 million, or 15.2%, to
approximately $302.0 million from $356.3 million for the same period in 2008.
Sales for the MRO Segment decreased $53.8 million, or 15.2%, to $300.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from $354.4 million for the same period
in 2008. Sales by businesses acquired in 2008, on a same store sales basis,
accounted for $26.2 million of 2009 sales. Excluding these sales by
the acquired businesses, sales for the MRO segment decreased
22.6%. This sales decrease is primarily due to a broad-based decrease
in sales of pumps, bearings, safety products and mill supplies in connection
with a broad-based decline in the U. S. economy. Sales for the Electrical
Contractor segment decreased by $0.5 million, or 26.0%,to $1.4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 from $1.9 million for the same period in 2008,
resulting from the decline in the economy. Sales of commodity and
specialty type electrical products declined.
GROSS
PROFIT. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 1.5%
for the six months ended June 30, 2009, to $29.0% from 27.5% for the same period
in 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the MRO segment
increased to 28.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from 27.4% for the
same period in 2008. This increase is primarily the result of
increased gross profit as a percentage of sales on sales of supply chain
services and MRO products and services in 2009 as compared to 2008 combined with
the effect of the three businesses acquired during 2008 having a higher gross
profit percentage than the remainder of DXP. Gross profit as a
percentage of sales for the Electrical Contractor segment decreased to 34.5% for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, from 36.5% for the same period in 2008. This
decrease resulted from sales of higher margin specialty-type electrical products
decreasing more than sales of commodity products decreased.
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by approximately $0.1
million to $75.6 million from $75.8 million for the same period in 2008.
Selling, general and administrative expense associated with the three businesses
acquired in 2008, on a same store basis, accounted for $8.2 million of the 2009
expense. On a same store basis, selling, general and administrative
expense decreased approximately $8.3 million. This decrease primarily
resulted from reduced salaries, incentive compensation, employee benefits and
travel expenses compared to the same period in 2008. As a percentage
of revenue, the 2009 expense increased by approximately 3.8%, to 25.1% for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 from 21.3% for the same period in
2008. This increase is primarily the result of sales decreasing more
than selling, general and administrative expenses decreased on a same store
sales basis.
OPERATING
INCOME. Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2009
decreased 46.4%, to $11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from
$22.1 million for the same period in 2008. Operating income for the
MRO segment decreased 46.3%, to $$11.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 from $21.7 million for the same period in 2008 as a result of a $10.2
million decrease in gross profit, partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in
selling, general and administrative expense. Operating
income for the Electrical Contractor
15
segment
decreased 56.6%, to $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from
$0.3 million for the same period in 2008, primarily as a result of decreased
gross profit due to decreased sales.
INTEREST
EXPENSE. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009
increased by 8.9%, to $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, from
$2.6 million for the same period in 2008. This increase
resulted from increased debt used to fund acquisitions completed in 2008, which
was partially offset by decreased market interest rates on floating rate
debt.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
General
Overview
As a
distributor of MRO products and Electrical Contractor products, we require
significant amounts of working capital to fund inventories and accounts
receivable. Additional cash is required for capital items such as information
technology and warehouse equipment. We also require cash to pay our lease
obligations and to service our debt.
We
generated $22.0 million of cash in operating activities during the first six
months of 2009 as compared to generating $5.4 million during the first six
months of 2008. This change between the two periods was primarily attributable
to a $23.3 million reduction in accounts receivable in the 2009 period compared
to a $15.5 million increase in accounts receivable in the 2008
period.
On August
28, 2008, DXP entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as lead arranger and administrative agent for the lenders (the
“Facility”). The Facility consists of a $50 million term loan and a
revolving credit facility that provides a $150 million line of credit to the
Company. The term loan requires principal payments of $2.5 million per quarter
beginning on December 31, 2008. This Facility replaced the Company’s prior
credit facility, which consisted of a $130 million revolving credit
facility. The Facility expires on August 11, 2013 and contains
financial covenants defining various financial measures and levels of these
measures with which the Company must comply. Covenant compliance is assessed as
of each quarter end and certain month ends for the asset test.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the amount available to be borrowed under
the Facility decreased from $37.0 million at December 31, 2008 to $36.2 million
at June 30, 2009. This decrease in availability primarily resulted
from the reduction in accounts receivable and inventory, which reduces the
amount which can be borrowed under the Facility.
To hedge
a portion of our floating rate debt, as of January 10, 2008, DXP entered into an
interest rate swap agreement with the lead bank of our
Facility. Through January 11, 2010, this interest rate swap
effectively fixes the interest rate on $40 million of floating rate one month
LIBOR borrowings under the Facility at 3.68% plus the margin (1.50% at June 30,
2009) in effect under the Facility.
The
Company’s borrowings under the revolving credit portion of the Facility and
letters of credit outstanding under the Facility at each month-end must equal an
amount less than an amount calculated by an asset test measured as of such
month-end. The asset test is defined under the Facility as the sum of 85% of the
Company’s net accounts receivable, 60% of net inventory, and 50% of non-real
estate property and equipment. The Company’s borrowing and letter of credit
capacity under the revolving credit portion of the Facility at any given time is
$150 million less borrowings under the revolving credit portion of the facility
and letters of credit outstanding, subject to the asset test described
above.
The
revolving credit portion of the Facility provides the option of interest at
LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.00% to 2.00% or prime rate plus a margin of
0.0% to 0.50%. On June 30, 2009, the LIBOR based rate on the
revolving credit portion of the Facility was LIBOR plus 1.50%. On
June 30, 2009, the prime based rate on the revolving credit portion of the
Facility was prime rate plus 0.0%. Commitment fees of 0.15% to 0.30%
per annum are payable on the portion of the Facility capacity not in use for
borrowings or letters of credit at any given time. At June 30, 2009,
the commitment fee was 0.25%. The term loan provides the option of
interest at LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50% or prime rate plus a
margin of
16
0.50% to
1.00%. At June 30, 2009, the LIBORbased rate for the term loan was
LIBOR plus 2.25%. At June 30, 2009, the prime based rate for the term
loan was prime rate plus 0.75%. At June 30, 2009, $130.5 million was
borrowed under the Facility at a weighted average interest rate of approximately
3.1% under the LIBOR options, including the effect of the interest rate swap,
and $7.2 million was borrowed under the prime rate options under the
Facility. Borrowings under the Facility are secured by all of the
Company’s accounts receivable, inventory, general intangibles and non-real
estate property and equipment. At June 30, 2009, we were in
compliance with all covenants. At June 30, 2009, $36.3 million was
available for borrowing under the most restrictive covenant of the
Facility.
The
Facility’s principal financial covenants include the following:
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio –
The Facility requires that the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the 12
month period ending on the last day of each quarter be not less than 1.25 to
1.0, stepping up to 1.5 to 1.0 for the quarter ending December 31, 2009 and to
1.75 for the quarter ending December 31, 2010, with “Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio” defined as the ratio of (a) EBITDA for the 12 months ending on such date
minus cash taxes, minus Capital Expenditures for such period
(excluding Acquisitions) to (b) the aggregate of interest expense, scheduled
principal payments in respect of long-term debt and current portion of capital
leases for such 12-month period, determined in each case on a consolidated basis
for Borrower and its subsidiaries.
Leverage Ratio – The Facility
requires that the Company’s Leverage Ratio, determined at the end of each fiscal
quarter, not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 as of each quarter end, stepping down to 3.0 to
1.0 beginning the quarter ending December 31, 2009, and to 2.75 to
1.0 for the quarter ending December 31, 2010. Leverage Ratio is
defined as the outstanding Indebtedness divided by EBITDA for the twelve months
then ended. Indebtedness is defined under the Facility for financial
covenant purposes as: a) all obligations of DXP for borrowed money including but
not limited to senior bank debt, senior notes, and subordinated debt; b) capital
leases; c) issued and outstanding letters of credit; and d) contingent
obligations for funded indebtedness.
EBITDA as
defined under the Facility for financial covenant purposes means, without
duplication, for any period, the consolidated net income (excluding any
extraordinary gains or losses) of DXP plus, to the extent deducted in
calculating consolidated net income, depreciation, amortization, other non-cash
items and non-recurring items, interest expense, and tax expense for taxes based
on income and minus, to the extent added in calculating consolidated net income,
any non-cash items and non-recurring items; provided that, if DXP acquires the
equity interests or assets of any person during such period under circumstances
permitted under the Facility, EBITDA shall be adjusted to give pro forma effect
to such acquisition assuming that such transaction had occurred on the first day
of such period and provided further that, if DXP divests the equity interests or
assets of any person during such period under circumstances permitted under this
Facility, EBITDA shall be adjusted to give pro forma effect to such divestiture
assuming that such transaction had occurred on the first day of such
period. Add-backs allowed pursuant to Article 11, Regulation S-X, of
the Securities Act of 1933 will also be included in the calculation of
EBITDA.
The
Leverage Ratio, which declines to 3.0 to 1.0 at December 31, 2009, is the most
restrictive covenant at June 30, 2009 and was approximately
2.75 to 1.0 at June 30, 2009. EBITDA for the 12 months ended June 30,
2009 was approximately $53.1 million, which was approximately $4.4 million, or
9%, greater than the amount required to meet a 3.0 to 1.0 Leverage
Ratio. The Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, which increases to 1.5 to one
at December 31, 2009, was approximately 2.0 to 1.0 at June 30, 2009, or
approximately 33% greater than the minimum ratio required at December 31,
2009.
Borrowings
June
30,
2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||
(in
Thousands)
|
|||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
$ 13,817
|
$ 13,965
|
$ (148)
|
||
Long-term
debt, less current portion
|
131,150
|
154,591
|
(23,441)
|
||
Total
long-term debt
|
$ 144,967
|
$ 168,556
|
$ (23,589)
(2)
|
||
Amount
available
|
$ 36,239(1)
|
$ 36,951(1)
|
$ (712)
(3)
|
17
Performance
Metrics
June
30, 2009
|
Increase
|
||||
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
|||
Days
of sales outstanding (in
days)
|
49.0
|
50.6
|
(1.6)
|
||
Inventory
turns
|
4.2
|
5.9
|
(1.7)
|
Accounts
receivable days of sales outstanding were 49.0 days at June 30, 2009 compared to
50.6 days at June 30, 2008. The decrease resulted primarily from a
change in customer mix which resulted in faster collection of accounts
receivable. Annualized inventory turns were 4.2 at June 30, 2009 and
5.9 at June 30, 2008. The decline in inventory turns primarily
resulted from the inclusion of businesses acquired in 2008, which have lower
inventory turns compared to the rest of DXP combined with the effect of first
half 2009 sales declining more than inventory declined.
Funding
Commitments
We
believe our cash generated from operations and available under our Credit
Facility will meet our normal working capital needs during the next twelve
months. However, we may require additional debt or equity financing to fund
potential acquisitions. Such additional financings may include
additional bank debt or the public or private sale of debt or equity
securities. In connection with any such financing, we may issue
securities that substantially dilute the interests of our
shareholders. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on
attractive terms, if at all.
Acquisitions
All of
the Company’s acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Revenues and expenses of the acquired businesses have
been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements beginning on
their respective dates of acquisition. The allocation of purchase
price to the acquired assets and liabilities is based on estimates of fair
market value and may be prospectively revised if and when additional information
the Company is awaiting concerning certain asset and liability valuations is
obtained, provided that such information is received no later than one year
after the date of acquisition.
On
February 1, 2008, DXP completed the acquisition of the business of Rocky Mtn
Supply, Inc. DXP acquired this business to expand DXP’s geographic presence in
Colorado. DXP paid approximately $4.6 million, net of acquired cash,
for this business. The purchase price consisted of approximately $3.9
million paid in cash and $0.7 million in seller notes. The cash
portion was funded by utilizing available capacity under DXP’s credit
facility.
On August
28, 2008, DXP completed the acquisition of PFI, LLC. DXP acquired
this business to strengthen DXP’s expertise in the distribution of
fasteners. DXP paid $66.4 million in cash for this
business. The purchase price was funded using the
Facility.
On
December 1, 2008, DXP completed the acquisition of the business of Falcon
Pump. DXP acquired this business to strengthen DXP’s pump offering in
the Rocky Mountain area. DXP paid $3.1 million in cash, $0.8 million
in seller notes and up to $1.0 million in future payments contingent upon future
earnings of the acquired business. The cash portion was funded using the
Facility.
The
allocation of purchase price for all acquisitions completed since June 30, 2008
are preliminary in the June 30, 2009 consolidated balance sheets. The
initial purchase price allocations may be adjusted within one year of the
purchase date for changes in the estimates of the fair value of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed. The following table summarizes the estimated
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed since June 30, 2008
in connection with the acquisitions described above (in
thousands):
18
Accounts
Receivable
|
$ 9,210
|
Inventory
|
24,422
|
Property
and equipment
|
2,625
|
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
44,657
|
Other
assets
|
274
|
Assets
acquired
|
81,188
|
Current
liabilities assumed
|
(5,165)
|
Non-current
liabilities assumed
|
(5,759)
|
Net
assets acquired
|
$ 70,264
|
The pro
forma unaudited results of operations for the Company on a consolidated basis
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008, assuming the purchases
completed in 2008 were consummated as of January 1, 2008 follows (in thousands,
except for per share data):
Three
Months
Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|||
Net
sales
|
$ 208,657
|
$ 398,915
|
||
Net
income
|
6,993
|
13,366
|
||
Per
share data
|
||||
Basic
earnings
|
$0.54
|
$1.04
|
||
Diluted
|
$0.51
|
$0.97
|
DISCUSSION
OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates
and assumptions in determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. The significant estimates made by us in the
accompanying financial statements relate to reserves for accounts receivable
collectability, inventory valuations, income taxes, self-insured liability
claims and self-insured medical claims. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. Management periodically re-evaluates these estimates as
events and circumstances change. Together with the effects of the matters
discussed above, these factors may significantly impact the Company’s results of
operations from period-to-period.
Critical
accounting policies are those that are both most important to the portrayal of a
company’s financial position and results of operations, and require management’s
subjective or complex judgments. These policies have been discussed
with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of DXP. Below is a
discussion of what we believe are our critical accounting policies.
Revenue
Recognition
For
binding agreements to fabricate tangible assets to customer specifications, the
Company recognizes revenues using the percentage of completion
method. For other sales, the Company recognizes revenues when an
agreement is in place, price is fixed, title for product passes to the customer
or services have been provided and collectability is reasonably assured.
Revenues are recorded net of sales taxes. Revenues recognized include
product sales and billings for freight and handling charges.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Provisions
to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made monthly and adjustments are made
periodically (as circumstances warrant) based upon the expected collectability
of all such accounts. Write-offs could be materially different from
the reserve provided if economic conditions change or actual results deviate
from historical trends.
19
Inventory
Inventory
consists principally of finished goods and is priced at the lower of cost or
market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”)
method. Reserves are provided against inventory for estimated
obsolescence based upon the aging of the inventory and market
trends. Actual obsolescence could be materially different from the
reserve if economic conditions or market trends change
significantly.
Self-insured
Insurance and Medical Claims
We
generally retain up to $100,000 of risk for each claim for workers compensation,
general liability, automobile and property loss. We accrue for the
estimated loss on the self-insured portion of these claims. The
accrual is adjusted quarterly based upon reported claims
information. The actual cost could deviate from the recorded
estimate.
We
generally retain up to $100,000 of risk on each medical claim for our employees
and dependents. We accrue for the estimated outstanding balance of unpaid
medical claims for our employees and their dependents. The accrual is
adjusted monthly based on recent claims experience. The actual claims
could deviate from recent claims experience and be materially different from the
reserve.
The
accrual for these claims at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
approximately $1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
and other intangible assets attributable to our reporting units are tested for
impairment by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying
value. Significant estimates used in the determination of fair value
include estimates of future cash flows, future growth rates, costs of capital
and estimates of market multiples. As required under current
accounting standards, we test for impairment annually at year end unless factors
otherwise indicate that impairment may have occurred. We did not have
any impairments under the provisions of SFAS No. 142 as of December 31,
2008.
Purchase
Accounting
The
Company estimates the fair value of assets, including property, machinery and
equipment and their related useful lives and salvage values, and liabilities
when allocating the purchase price of an acquisition.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the
financial statement and income tax bases of assets and
liabilities. Such deferred income tax asset and liability
computations are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in
which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances
are established to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amounts expected to
be realized.
Cost
of Sales and Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Cost of
sales includes product and product related costs, inbound freight charges,
internal transfer costs and depreciation. Selling, general and
administrative expense includes purchasing and receiving costs, inspection
costs, warehousing costs, depreciation and amortization. DXP’s gross
margins may not be comparable to those of other entities, since some entities
include all of the costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales
and others like DXP exclude a portion of these costs from gross margin,
including the costs in a line item, such as selling, general and administrative
expense.
20
ITEM
3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Our
market risk results from volatility in interest rates. Our exposure
to interest rate risk relates primarily to our debt portfolio. Using
floating interest rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2009, a 100 basis point
change in interest rates would result in approximately a $1,024,000 change in
annual interest expense.
ITEM
4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) was evaluated by our management with the participation of our
President and Chief Executive Officer, David R. Little (principal executive
officer), and our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mac
McConnell (principal financial officer). Messrs. Little and McConnell
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective, as of
the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, to help
ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file with
the SEC is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure and recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods prescribed by the SEC.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
In
reliance on guidance set forth in Question 3 of a “Frequently Asked Questions”
interpretative release issued by the staff of the SEC’s Office of the Chief
Accountant and the Division of Corporation Finance in June 2004, as revised on
September 24, 2007, our management determined that it would exclude PFI, LLC and
the business of Falcon Pump from the scope of its assessment of internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. The reason for this
exclusion is that we acquired all of the stock of PFI, LLC, and the business of
Falcon Pump during 2008 and it was not possible for management to conduct an
assessment of internal control over financial reporting in the period between
the dates the acquisitions were completed and the date of management’s
assessment. The Company has excluded PFI, LLC and Falcon Pump from
its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30,
2009. The total assets and revenues of PFI, LLC and Falcon Pump
represent approximately 24.1% and 8.4%, respectively, of the related
consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the six months ended June
30, 2009.
PART
II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
No
material developments have occurred in the asbestos related litigation or the
litigation with BP America Production Company disclosed in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On June
19, 2009, at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders, the individuals
listed below were elected directors by the holders of Common Stock, Series A
Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, voting together as a
class.
Shares/Votes
Voted
For
|
Shares/Votes
Withheld
|
|
David
Little
|
11,720,858
|
155,726
|
Cletus
Davis
|
11,741,779
|
134,805
|
Timothy
P. Halter
|
11,711,103
|
165,481
|
Kenneth
H. Miller
|
11,618,811
|
257,773
|
Charles
R. Strader
|
11,284,361
|
592,223
|
21
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
3.1
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No.
333-61953), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August
20, 1998).
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333-10021), filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 12,
1996).
|
10.1
|
Amendment
No. Two to Employment Agreement dated effective as of January 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
(Reg. No. 000-21513) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 22, 2009.
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. (Filed
herewith).
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. (Filed
herewith).
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed
herewith).
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed
herewith).
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
DXP
ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/MAC
McCONNELL
Mac
McConnell
Senior
Vice-President/Finance and
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly
Authorized Officer)
Dated: August
10, 2009
22