DXP ENTERPRISES INC - Quarter Report: 2016 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

or

☐

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-21513

DXP Enterprises, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Number of shares of registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of November 14, 2016: 17,336,469 par value $0.01 per share.

 

---

PART I:

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1:

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DXP ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

DXP ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

DXP ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands) (unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

DXP ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY

DXP Enterprises, Inc. together with its subsidiaries (collectively “DXP,” “Company,” “us,” “we,” or “our”) was incorporated in Texas on July 26, 1996, to be the successor to SEPCO Industries, Inc. DXP Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries are engaged in the business of distributing maintenance, repair and operating (MRO) products, and services to industrial customers. Additionally, DXP provides integrated, custom pump skid packages, pump remanufacturing and manufactures branded private label pumps to industrial customers. The Company is organized into three business segments: Service Centers (SC), Supply Chain Services (SCS) and Innovative Pumping Solutions (IPS). See Note 14 for discussion of the business segments.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“USGAAP”). The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries and its variable interest entity (“VIE”). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis as our annual consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. For a more complete discussion of our significant accounting policies and business practices, refer to the consolidated annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full fiscal year. In the opinion of management, these condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 (audited) and September 30, 2016 (unaudited), condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive operations for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2016 (unaudited), and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2016 (unaudited). All such adjustments represent normal recurring items.

In the third quarter of 2015, DXP became the primary beneficiary of a VIE in which DXP owns 47.5% of the equity. DXP consolidates the financial statements of the VIE with the financial statements of DXP. As of September 30, 2016, the total assets of the VIE were approximately $5.2 million including approximately $4.9 million of property and equipment compared to $4.4 million of total assets and $2.9 million of property and equipment at September 30, 2015. DXP is the primary customer of the VIE. For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, consolidation of the VIE increased cost of sales by approximately $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, consolidation of the VIE increased cost of sales by approximately $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The Company recognized a related income tax benefit of $50 thousand and $185 thousand, respectively, related to the VIE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Company recognized a related income tax benefit of $130 thousand related to the VIE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2016, the owners of the 52.5% of the equity not owned by DXP included a former executive officer and other employees of DXP.

Equity investments in which we exercise significant influence, but do not control and are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. During the first quarter of 2016, DXP invested $4.0 million in a related party equity method investment which is included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” due to its short-term nature. During the third quarter of 2016, the investment was reduced by $0.8 million of distributions received from the investment. A portion of the remaining interest in this investment is owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

 

All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

 

NOTE 3 – RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

We believe our cash generated from operations will meet our normal working capital needs during the next twelve months. We expect we will be able to comply with the financial covenants under our credit facility through and including June 30, 2017. Because the credit facility matures on March 31, 2018, and the financial covenants become more restrictive after June 30, 2017, we will need to amend our credit facility or obtain alternative financing including additional debt and/or equity during the next eighteen months. Such alternative financings may include additional bank debt or the public or private sale of debt or equity securities. In connection with any such financing, we may issue securities that substantially dilute the interests of our shareholders. We may not be able to amend the Facility or to obtain alternative financing on attractive terms, if at all.

NOTE 4 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The update aims to simplify aspects of accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842): The update requires organizations that lease assets (“lessees”) to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with terms of more than 12 months. The recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee remains dependent on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The criteria for determining whether a lease is a finance or operating lease has not been significantly changed by this ASU. The ASU also requires additional disclosure of the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases, including qualitative and quantitative requirements. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The update requires entities to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The update simplifies the current guidance, which requires entities to separately present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 clarify the subsequent measurement of inventory requiring an entity to subsequently measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This ASU applies only to inventory that is measured using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost method. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 should be applied prospectively and are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires entities to recognize debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, however, early adoption is permitted. DXP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2015 and adjusted the balance sheet and related disclosures for all periods presented.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which asserts that management should evaluate whether there are relevant conditions or events that are known and reasonably knowable that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued when applicable. If conditions or events at the date the financial statements are issued raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosures are required which will enable users of the financial statements to understand the conditions or events as well as management’s evaluation and plan. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter; early application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which provides guidance on revenue recognition. The core principal of this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance requires entities to apply a five-step method to (1) identify the contract(s) with customers; (2) identify the performance obligation(s) in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation(s) in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This pronouncement was originally effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. In April 2015, the FASB approved a proposal to defer the effective date to fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Authoritative guidance for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis applies to all financial assets and financial liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. Fair value, as defined in the authoritative guidance, is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The authoritative guidance affects the fair value measurement of an investment with quoted market prices in an active market for identical instruments, which must be classified in one of the following categories:

Level 1 Inputs

Level 1 inputs come from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs

Level 2 inputs are other than quoted prices that are observable for an asset or liability. These inputs include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

 

Level 3 Inputs

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability which require the Company’s own assumptions.

Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

During the third and fourth quarters of 2015, in connection with interim tests for impairment, DXP recorded total impairment charges of $68.7 million in order to reflect the implied fair values of goodwill, which is a non-recurring fair value adjustment. The fair values of goodwill used in the impairment calculations were estimated based on discounted estimated future cash flows with the discount rates of 10.0% to 11.5%. The measurements utilized to determine the implied fair value of goodwill represent significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.

NOTE 6 – INVENTORIES, NET

The carrying values of inventories are as follows (in thousands):

 

NOTE 7 – COSTS AND ESTIMATED PROFITS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS

Costs and estimated profits in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts arise in the consolidated balance sheets when revenues have been recognized but the amounts cannot be billed under the terms of the contracts. Such amounts are recoverable from customers upon various measures of performance, including achievement of certain milestones, completion of specified units, or completion of a contract.

Costs and estimated profits on uncompleted contracts and related amounts billed were as follows (in thousands):

 

Such amounts were included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for 2016 and 2015 under the following captions (in thousands):

 

NOTE 8 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

The carrying values of property and equipment are as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 9 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

The following table presents the goodwill balance by reportable segment as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

 

 

The following table presents a summary of amortizable other intangible assets (in thousands):

Gross carrying amounts as well as accumulated amortization are partially affected by the fluctuation of foreign currency rates. Other intangible assets are amortized according to estimated economic benefits over their estimated useful lives.

NOTE 10 – LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

On July 11, 2012, DXP entered into a credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Issuing Lender, Swingline Lender and Administrative Agent for the lenders (as amended, the “Original Facility”). On January 2, 2014, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Issuing Lender and Administrative Agent for other lenders (as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2015 (the “First Amendment”), that certain Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2015 (the “Second Amendment”), that certain Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2016 (the “Third Amendment”), and that certain Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2016 (the “Fourth Amendment”), the “Facility”), amending and restating the Original Facility. Pursuant to the Facility, as of September 30, 2016, the lenders named therein provided to DXP a $137.5 million term loan and a $205 million revolving line of credit.  The Facility expires on March 31, 2018.  Loans made from the Facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes of DXP and its subsidiaries.  As of September 30, 2016, the aggregate principal amount of revolving loans outstanding under the facility was $178 million.

Amortization payments are required with respect to the Facility on the last business day of each fiscal quarter, payable at $12.5 million per quarter for the fiscal quarter periods ending September 30, 2016 through and including December 31, 2016, and payable at $15.625 million per quarter for the fiscal quarter periods ending March 31, 2017 and thereafter. On October 31, 2016, DXP prepaid the $12.5 million amortization payment due on December 31, 2016, and prepaid $12 million of the $15.625 million amortization payment due on March 31, 2017. See Note 18 for discussion of the subsequent events. The Fourth Amendment required additional term loan principal reductions of $17 million by December 31, 2016 and $14 million by March 31, 2017.  During October 2016, DXP paid the mandatory $17 million and $14 million principal reductions. At September 30 and October 31, 2016, the aggregate principal amount of term loans outstanding under the Facility was $137.5 million and $74.5 million, respectively.

 

Under the terms of the Fourth Amendment:

 

 

On September 30, 2016, the LIBOR based rate in effect under the Facility was LIBOR plus 5.00% and the prime based rate of the Facility was prime plus 4.00%. At September 30, 2016, $315.5 million was borrowed under the Facility at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 5.65%.  At September 30, 2016, the Company had $20.2 million available for borrowing under the Facility.

Commitment fees of 0.50% per annum are payable on the portion of the Facility capacity not in use at any given time on the line of credit. Commitment fees are included as interest in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Facility contains financial covenants defining various financial measures and levels of these measures with which the Company must comply. Covenant compliance is assessed as of each month end. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are pledged as collateral to secure the Facility.

NOTE 11 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Restricted Stock

Under the restricted stock plans approved by our shareholders (the “Restricted Stock Plans”), directors, consultants and employees were awarded shares of DXP’s common stock. The shares of restricted stock granted to employees and that are outstanding as of September 30, 2016 vest in accordance with one of the following vesting schedules: 100% one year after date of grant; 33.3% each year for three years after the date of grant; 20% each year for five years after the grant date; or 10% each year for ten years after the grant date. The shares of restricted stock granted to non-employee directors of DXP vest one year after the grant date. The fair value of restricted stock awards was measured based upon the closing prices of DXP’s common stock on the grant dates and is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards. Once restricted stock vests, new shares of the Company’s stock are issued.

 

Changes in restricted stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were as follows:

 

Compensation expense, associated with restricted stock, recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1.9 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Related income tax losses recognized in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were approximately $0.6 million. Unrecognized compensation expense under the Restricted Stock Plan at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $3.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2016, the weighted average period over which the unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized is 19.1 months.

NOTE 12 - EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA

Basic earnings per share is computed based on weighted average shares outstanding and excludes dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per share is computed including the impacts of all potentially dilutive securities.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data):

 

NOTE 13 - BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

All of the Company’s acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Revenues and expenses of the acquired businesses have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements beginning on their respective dates of acquisition. The allocation of purchase price to the acquired assets and liabilities is based on estimates of fair market value and may be prospectively revised if and when additional information the Company is awaiting concerning certain asset and liability valuations is obtained, provided that such information is received no later than one year after the date of acquisition. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. It specifically includes the expected synergies and other benefits that we believe will result from combining the operations of our acquisitions with the operations of DXP and any intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as the assembled workforce.

On April 1, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the equity interests of Tool Supply, Inc. (“TSI”) to expand DXP’s cutting tools offering in the Northwest region of the United States. DXP paid approximately $5.0 million for TSI, which was borrowed under the Facility. Estimated goodwill of $2.9 million and intangible assets of $2.0 million were recognized for this acquisition. All of the estimated goodwill is included in the Service Centers segment. None of the estimated goodwill or intangible assets are expected to be tax deductible.

On September 1, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the equity interests of Cortech Engineering, LLC (“Cortech”) to expand DXP’s rotating equipment offering to the Western seaboard. DXP paid approximately $14.9 million for Cortech. The purchase was financed with borrowings under the Facility as well as by issuing $4.4 million (148.8 thousand shares) of DXP common stock. Estimated goodwill of $8.7 million and intangible assets of $5.2 million were recognized for this acquisition. All of the estimated goodwill is included in the Service Centers segment. Approximately $4.5 million of the goodwill and intangible assets are not deductible for tax purposes.

The values assigned to the non-compete agreements and customer relationships for business acquisitions were determined by discounting the estimated cash flows associated with non-compete agreements and customer relationships as of the date the acquisition was consummated. The estimated cash flows were based on estimated revenues net of operating expenses and net of capital charges for assets that contribute to the projected cash flow from these assets. The projected revenues and operating expenses were estimated based on management estimates at the date of purchase. Net capital charges for assets that contribute to projected cash flow were based on the estimated fair value of those assets.

For the three months ended September 30, 2016, businesses acquired during 2015 contributed sales of $5.4 million and a loss before taxes of approximately $0.8 million.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, businesses acquired during 2015 contributed sales of $18.4 million and a loss before taxes of approximately $1.2 million.

 

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during 2015 in connection with the acquisitions described above (in thousands):

 

The pro forma unaudited results of operations for the Company on a consolidated basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, assuming the acquisition of businesses completed in 2015 were consummated as of January 1, 2015, are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

NOTE 14 - SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company’s reportable business segments are: Service Centers, Innovative Pumping Solutions and Supply Chain Services. The Service Centers segment is engaged in providing maintenance, MRO products, equipment and integrated services, including logistics capabilities, to industrial customers. The Service Centers segment provides a wide range of MRO products in the rotating equipment, bearing, power transmission, hose, fluid power, metal working, fastener, industrial supply, safety products and safety services categories. The Innovative Pumping Solutions segment fabricates and assembles custom-made pump packages, remanufactures pumps and manufactures branded private label pumps. The Supply Chain Services segment provides a wide range of MRO products and manages all or part of a customer's supply chain, including warehouse and inventory management.

The high degree of integration of the Company’s operations necessitates the use of a substantial number of allocations and apportionments in the determination of business segment information. Sales are shown net of intersegment eliminations.

The following table sets out financial information related to the Company’s segments (in thousands):

 

The following table presents reconciliations of operating income for reportable segments to the consolidated income before taxes (in thousands):

 

NOTE 15 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While DXP is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, it believes that the ultimate resolution will not have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on DXP’s consolidated financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.

NOTE 16 – SALES OF COMMON STOCK

On August 24, 2016, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Form S-3 Registration Statement, commonly referred to as a “shelf registration,” whereby the Company registered shares of common stock. In September 2016, pursuant to this registration statement, the Company issued 238,858 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $26.38 per share. Net proceeds were approximately $6.0 million.

On October 31, 2016, the Company closed on the sale of 2,484,000 shares of stock for total net proceeds of $46.2 million after expenses. These proceeds were used to pay down debt obligations.

NOTE 17 – SHARE REPURCHASES

On December 17, 2014, DXP publicly announced an authorization from the Board of Directors that allows DXP from time to time to purchase up to 400,000 shares of DXP's common stock over 24 months. Purchases could be made in open market or in privately negotiated transactions. During the first quarter of 2015, DXP purchased 191,420 shares for $8.9 million under this authorization, leaving 208,580 shares still authorized as of September 30, 2016.

 

NOTE 18 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 3, 2016, the Company sold Vertex Corporate Holdings, Inc. for approximately $31 million in cash. The sale is a non-core business divestiture for DXP, and the proceeds were primarily used to pay down debt obligations. See Note 10 for discussion of long-term debt.

On October 31, 2016, the Company closed on the sale of 2,484,000 shares of stock for total net proceeds of $46.2 million after expenses. These proceeds were used to pay down debt obligations. See Note 10 for discussion of long-term debt.

ITEM 2:

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following management discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the financial condition and results of operations of DXP Enterprises, Inc. together with its subsidiaries (collectively “DXP,” “Company,” “us,” “we,” or “our”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 should be read in conjunction with our previous annual report on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q incorporated in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by reference, and the financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual and quarterly reports. The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“USGAAP”).

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “might”, “estimates”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would”, “suspect”, “potential”, “current”, “achieve”, “plans” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and may involve significant risks and uncertainties, and actual results may vary materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements or historical performance as a result of various factors. These factors include our ability to satisfy our debt covenants under our credit facility, our ability to refinance our debt on acceptable terms, the effectiveness of management’s strategies and decisions, our ability to implement our internal growth and acquisition growth  strategies, general economic and business condition specific to our primary customers, changes in government regulations, our ability to effectively integrate businesses we may acquire, new or modified statutory or regulatory requirements and changing prices and market conditions. This Report identifies other factors that could cause such differences. We cannot assure that these are all of the factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in "Risk Factors", included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016. We assume no obligation and do not intend to update these forward-looking statements. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Report to the "Company", "DXP", “we” or “our” shall mean DXP Enterprises, Inc., a Texas corporation, together with its subsidiaries.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except percentages and per share data)

DXP is organized into three business segments: Service Centers (SC), Supply Chain Services (SCS) and Innovative Pumping Solutions (IPS). The Service Centers are engaged in providing maintenance, repair and operating (MRO) products, equipment and integrated services, including technical expertise and logistics capabilities, to industrial customers with the ability to provide same day delivery. The Service Centers provide a wide range of MRO products and services in the rotating equipment, bearing, power transmission, hose, fluid power, metal working, industrial supply and safety product and service categories. The SCS segment provides a wide range of MRO products and manages all or part of our customer’s supply chain, including inventory. The IPS segment fabricates and assembles integrated pump system packages custom made to customer specifications, remanufactures pumps and manufactures branded private label pumps. Over 90% of DXP’s revenues represent sales of products.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2015

SALES. Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2016 decreased $73.1 million, or 24.1%, to approximately $230.0 million from $303.1 million for the prior corresponding period. Sales by an acquired business during 2015 accounted for $3.0 million of the third quarter 2016 sales. Excluding third quarter 2016 sales from an acquired business, on a same store sales basis, sales for the third quarter in 2016 decreased by $76.1 million, or 25.1% from the prior corresponding period. This same store sales decrease is the result of decreases in our Service Center, IPS and SCS segments of $50.3 million, $21.6 million and $4.2 million, respectively, on a same store sales basis. These declines are explained in segment discussions below.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by approximately 55 basis points from the prior corresponding period. On a same store sales basis, gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased by approximately 60 basis points. The decline in the same store gross profit percentage is the result of an approximate 435 basis point decline in the gross profit percentage in our IPS segment, which was partially offset by an increase of approximately 140 basis points in the gross profit percentage of our SCS segment. These fluctuations are explained in the segment discussions below.

 

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A) for the three months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by approximately $16.2 million, or 21.6%, to $58.9 million from $75.1 million for the prior corresponding period. SG&A expense from an acquired business accounted for $1.1 million of the third quarter amount. Excluding third quarter expenses from an acquired business, on a same store sales basis, SG&A for the quarter decreased by $17.3 million, or 23.0%. The overall decline in SG&A, on a same store sales basis, is partially the result of a $12.6 million decrease in payroll, incentive compensation, payroll taxes and 401(k) expenses due to headcount and salary reductions. As a result of the headcount reductions and additional cost containment measures, meals and entertainment, travel, and vehicle expenses decreased by $1.8 million. Additionally, same store sales amortization expense declined by $0.9 million and legal expenses decreased by $0.9 million as a result of resolving the B27 working capital dispute and a dispute with ITT Goulds. The remaining decline in SG&A expense for the third quarter of 2016 is consistent with the decrease in sales. As a percentage of sales, the third quarter 2016 expense, on a same store sales basis, increased approximately 65 basis points to 25.4%, from 24.8% for the prior corresponding period, on a same store sales basis, primarily as a result of the percentage decrease in sales exceeding the percentage decline in SG&A.

OPERATING INCOME. Excluding the 2015 impairment expense of $58.9 million and the 2015 B27 settlement expense of $7.3 million, operating income for the third quarter of 2016 decreased $5.7 million, to $4.9 million, from $10.6 million for the prior corresponding period. A business acquired in 2015 accounted for $0.2 million of the decrease. On a same store sales basis, operating income for the third quarter of 2016 decreased $5.5 million. This decrease in operating income, on a same store basis, is primarily related to the decline in sales and gross profit discussed above.

INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense for the third quarter of 2016 increased 64.9% from the prior corresponding period as a result of increased interest rates.

INCOME TAXES. Our provision for income taxes differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and non-deductible expenses. The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2016 increased to 78.5%, from 10.1% in the prior corresponding period, primarily as a result of the combination of near break-even income for 2016, state taxes and permanent differences.

SERVICE CENTERS SEGMENT. Sales for the Service Centers segment decreased by $47.3 million, or 23.7% for the third quarter of 2016 compared to the prior corresponding period. Excluding third quarter 2016 Service Centers segment sales from an acquired business of $3.0 million, Service Centers segment sales for the third quarter in 2016 decreased $50.3 million, or 25.2% from the prior corresponding period, on a same store sales basis. This sales decrease is primarily the result of decreased sales of rotating equipment, bearings, metal working products and safety services to customers engaged in the upstream oil and gas market or manufacturing equipment for the upstream oil and gas market. If crude oil and natural gas prices remain at, or below, prices experienced during the third quarter of 2016, this decreased level of sales to the upstream oil and gas industry would be expected to continue during the remainder of 2016. As a percentage of sales, the third quarter gross profit percentage for the Service Centers remained flat compared to the prior corresponding period. Excluding amortization, operating income for the Service Centers segment decreased $4.6 million, or 25.7%. On a same store sales basis, operating income for the Service Centers segment decreased 25.9%.  The decline in operating income is primarily the result of the decline in sales and gross profit percentage discussed above.

INNOVATIVE PUMPING SOLUTIONS SEGMENT. Sales for the IPS segment decreased by $21.6 million, or 35.2% for the third quarter of 2016 compared to the prior corresponding period. This decrease was primarily the result of a decline in the capital spending by oil and gas producers and related businesses stemming from the decline in the price of oil. This decreased level of IPS sales could continue during the remainder of 2016 if crude oil and natural gas prices remain at or below prices experienced during the third quarter of 2016. As a percentage of sales, the third quarter gross profit percentage for the IPS segment decreased approximately 435 basis points from the prior corresponding period. The decreased gross profit as a percentage of sales for the IPS segment is the result of competitive pressures resulting in lower margin jobs and unabsorbed manufacturing and fabrication overhead. Gross profit margins for individual orders for the IPS segment can fluctuate significantly because each order is for a unique package built to customer specifications and subject to varying competition. Excluding amortization, operating income for the IPS segment decreased $4.5 million primarily as a result of the decrease in sales and gross profit margins discussed above.

 

SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES SEGMENT. Sales for the SCS segment decreased by $4.1 million, or 9.8%, for the third quarter of 2016 compared to the prior corresponding period. The decrease in sales is primarily related to decreased sales to customers in the oil and gas and trucking industries, which were partially offset by increased sales to customers engaged in aircraft components manufacturing and mining. We suspect customers in the oilfield services and oilfield equipment manufacturing industries purchased less from DXP because of the decline in capital spending by oil and gas companies operating in the U.S. and Canada. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased approximately 140 basis points compared to the prior corresponding period primarily as a result of decreased sales of lower margin products to oil and gas and trucking related customers. Excluding amortization, operating income for the SCS segment increased 2.8% primarily as a result of the 140 basis point increase in gross profit as a percentage of sales.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

SALES. Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased $228.6 million, or 23.6%, to approximately $739.8 million from $968.4 million for the prior corresponding period. Sales by businesses acquired in 2015 accounted for $15.1 million of the 2016 sales. Excluding 2016 sales from acquired businesses, on a same store sales basis, sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by $243.7 million, or 25.2%, from the prior corresponding period. This sales decrease is the result of decreases in our Service Center, IPS and SCS segments of $173.0 million, $61.0 million and $9.7 million, respectively, on a same store sales basis. These variances are explained in segment discussions below.

GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by approximately 80 basis points compared with the prior corresponding period. On a same store sales basis, gross profit as a percentage of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by approximately 85 basis points compared with the prior corresponding period. This decline is primarily the result of an approximate 265 basis point decline in the gross profit percentage for our IPS segment and an approximate 60 basis point decline in the gross profit percentage of our Service Centers segment. These declines were partially offset by an approximate 155 basis point increase in the gross profit percentage of the SCS segment. All of the fluctuations are explained in the segment discussions below.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by approximately $39.8 million, or 17.1%, to $192.5 million from $232.3 million for the prior corresponding period. SG&A from business acquired accounted for $5.2 million of the expense. Excluding expenses from acquired businesses, on a same store sales basis, SG&A year-to-date decreased by $45.0 million, or 19.4%. The overall decline in SG&A, on a same store sales basis, is partially the result of a $29.2 million decrease in payroll, incentive compensation, payroll taxes and 401(k) expenses due to headcount and salary reductions. As a result of the headcount reductions and additional cost containment measures, meals and entertainment, travel, and vehicle expenses decreased by $3.7 million. Additionally, same store sales amortization expense declined by $3.0 million and legal expenses decreased by $1.4 million as a result of resolving the B27 working capital dispute and a dispute with ITT Goulds. The remaining decline in SG&A expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 is consistent with the decrease in sales. As a percentage of sales, the year-to-date 2016 expense, on a same store sales basis, increased to 25.8%, from 24.0% for the prior corresponding period as a result of the percentage decrease in sales discussed above exceeding the percentage decrease in SG&A.

OPERATING INCOME. Excluding the 2015 impairment expense of $58.9 million and the 2015 B27 settlement expense of $7.3 million, operating income for the first nine months of 2016 decreased $30.9 million, or 72.4% compared to the prior corresponding period. Operating loss from acquired businesses increased the decline in operating income by $0.6 million. Excluding operating loss from acquired businesses, on a same store sales basis, operating income decreased $30.3 million, or 71.0% from the prior corresponding period. This decrease in operating income is primarily related to the decline in sales and gross profit discussed above.

INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense for the first nine months of 2016 increased 48.0% from the prior corresponding period primarily as a result of increased interest rates.

 

INCOME TAXES. Our provision for income taxes differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and non-deductible expenses. The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2016 increased to 95.8%, from 14.4% in the prior  corresponding period, primarily as a result of the combination of near break-even income, state taxes and permanent differences.

SERVICE CENTERS SEGMENT. Sales for the Service Centers segment decreased by $157.9 million, or 24.7%, for the first nine months of 2016 compared to the prior corresponding period. Excluding year-to-date 2016 Service Centers segment sales from acquired businesses of $15.1 million, Service Centers segment sales for the first nine months in 2016 decreased $173.0 million, or 27.1% from the prior corresponding period, on a same store sales basis. This sales decrease is primarily the result of decreased sales of rotating equipment, bearings, metal working products and safety services to customers engaged in the upstream oil and gas market or manufacturing equipment for the upstream oil and gas market. If crude oil and natural gas prices remain at, or below, prices experienced during the first nine months of 2016, this declining level of sales to the upstream oil and gas industry would be expected to continue during the remainder of 2016. Gross profit as a percentage of sales, on a same store sales basis, decreased approximately 60 basis points as a result of declines in sales of higher margin pumps, metal working products and safety services. Excluding amortization, operating income for the Service Centers segment decreased $26.5 million, or 42.7%. Excluding year-to-date Service Centers segment operating income before amortization expense from acquired businesses of $0.4 million, Service Centers segment operating income before amortization for the first nine months in 2016 decreased by $26.8 million, or 43.3% primarily as a result of the decrease in sales and gross profit percentage discussed above.

INNOVATIVE PUMPING SOLUTIONS SEGMENT. Sales for the IPS segment decreased by $61.0 million, or 30.1%, for the first nine months of 2016 compared to the prior corresponding period. The sales decrease primarily resulted from a decrease in capital spending by our oil and gas related customers. Excluding amortization, operating income for the IPS segment decreased by $13.3 million, or 42.7%, primarily as a result of the 30.1% decrease in sales as well as an approximate 265 basis point decline in gross profit percentage. The decreased gross profit as a percentage of sales for the IPS segment is the result of competitive pressures resulting in lower margin jobs and unabsorbed manufacturing and fabrication overhead. Additionally, gross profit margins for individual orders for the IPS segment can fluctuate significantly because each order is for a unique package built to customer specifications and subject to varying competition.

SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES SEGMENT. Sales for the SCS segment decreased by $9.7 million, or 7.7%, for the first nine months of 2016 compared to the prior corresponding period. The decrease in sales is primarily related to decreased sales to customers in the oil and gas and trucking industries, which were partially offset by increased sales to customers engaged in aircraft components manufacturing and mining. We suspect customers in the oilfield services and oilfield equipment manufacturing industries purchased less from DXP because of the decline in capital spending by oil and gas companies operating in the U.S. and Canada. Excluding amortization, operating income for the SCS segment increased 7.2% primarily as a result of an approximate 155 basis point increase in gross profit percentage when compared to the first nine months of 2015. The increase in gross profit percentage is primarily due to decreased sales of lower margin products to oil and gas and trucking related customers.

BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS, GOODWILL AND SUPPLEMENTAL PRO-FORMA DATA

A key component of our growth strategy includes completing acquisitions of businesses with complementary or desirable product lines, locations or customers. Since 2004, we have completed 31 acquisitions across our three business segments. Below is a summary of recent acquisitions.

On April 1, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the equity interests of Tool Supply, Inc. (“TSI”) to expand DXP’s cutting tools offering in the Northwest region of the United States. DXP paid approximately $5.0 million for TSI, which was borrowed under the Facility.

On September 1, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the equity interests of Cortech Engineering, LLC (“Cortech”) to expand DXP’s rotating equipment offering to the Western seaboard. DXP paid approximately $14.9 million for Cortech. The purchase was financed with borrowings under the Facility as well as $4.4 million (148.8 thousand shares) of DXP common stock.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2016, businesses acquired during 2015 contributed sales of $5.4 million and a loss before taxes of approximately $0.8 million.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, businesses acquired during 2015 contributed sales of $18.4 million and a loss before taxes of approximately $1.2 million.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during 2015 in connection with the acquisitions described above (in thousands):

 

The pro forma unaudited results of operations for the Company on a consolidated basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, assuming the acquisition of businesses completed in 2015 were consummated as of January 1, 2015, are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2016				2015				2016				2015
Net sales		$	230,025			$	306,924			$	739,801			$	984,247
Net income (loss) attributable to DXP Enterprises, Inc.		$	263			$	(52,435	)		$	321			$	(34,551	)
Per share data attributable to DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic earnings (loss)		$	0.02			$	(3.62	)		$	0.02			$	(2.41	)
Diluted earnings (loss)		$	0.02			$	(3.62	)		$	0.02			$	(2.41	)

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

General Overview

As a distributor of MRO products and services, we require significant amounts of working capital to fund inventories and accounts receivable. Additional cash is required for capital items for information technology, warehouse equipment, leasehold improvements, pump manufacturing equipment and safety services equipment. We also require cash to pay our lease obligations and to service our debt.

The Company generated $35.5 million of cash in operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $74.8 million during the prior corresponding period. The decrease between the two periods was primarily driven by reduced earnings and a $38.2 million smaller reduction in accounts receivable in the 2016 period compared to the 2015 period. The smaller decline in accounts receivable resulted from the smaller decrease in sales from the third quarter of 2016 versus the fourth quarter 2015 compared to the decline in sales in the third quarter of 2015 versus the fourth quarter of 2014.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the amount available to be borrowed under our credit facility increased from $19.8 million at December 31, 2015, to $20.2 million at September 30, 2016. This increase in availability is a result of the decrease in the credit facility outstanding balance, combined with the reduction to the minimum Asset Coverage Ratio beginning June 30, 2016. We expect that we will be able to comply with the financial covenants in our credit facility through and including June 30, 2017. Because the credit facility matures on March 31, 2018 and the financial covenants become more restrictive after June 30, 2017, we will need to amend our credit facility or obtain alternative financing during the next eighteen months. If such an amendment or alternate financing is not obtained during the next eighteen months, then we believe that the liquidity of our balance sheet and credit facility may not provide us with the ability to meet our working capital needs, scheduled principal payments, capital expenditures and Series B convertible preferred stock dividend payments.

Credit Facility

On July 11, 2012, DXP entered into a credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Issuing Lender, Swingline Lender and Administrative Agent for the lenders (as amended, the “Original Facility”). On January 2, 2014, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Issuing Lender and Administrative Agent for other lenders (as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2015 (the “First Amendment”), that certain Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2015 (the “Second Amendment”), that certain Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2016 (the “Third Amendment”), and that certain Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2016 (the “Fourth Amendment” and as so amended, the “Facility”), amending and restating the Original Facility. Pursuant to the Facility, as of September 30, 2016, the lenders named therein provided to DXP a $137.5 million term loan and a $205 million revolving line of credit.  The Facility expires on March 31, 2018.  Loans made from the Facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes of DXP and its subsidiaries.  As of September 30, 2016, the aggregate principal amount of revolving loans outstanding under the facility was $178 million.

Amortization payments are required with respect to the Facility on the last business day of each fiscal quarter, payable at $12.5 million per quarter for the fiscal quarter periods ending September 30, 2016 through and including December 31, 2016, and payable at $15.625 million per quarter for the fiscal quarter periods ending March 31, 2017 and thereafter. On October 31, 2016, DXP prepaid the $12.5 million amortization payment due on December 31, 2016, and prepaid $12 million of the $15.625 million amortization payment due on March 31, 2017. The Fourth Amendment required additional term loan principal reductions of $17 million by December 31, 2016 and $14 million by March 31, 2017.  During October, 2015 DXP paid the mandatory $17 million and $14 million principal reductions.  At September 30 and October 31, 2016, the aggregate principal amount of term loans outstanding under the Facility was $137.5 million and $74.5 million, respectively.

Under the terms of the Fourth Amendment:

 

 

On September 30, 2016, the LIBOR based rate in effect under the Facility was LIBOR plus 5.0% and the prime based rate of the Facility was prime plus 4.0%. At September 30, 2016, $315.5 million was borrowed under the Facility at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 5.65%. At September 30, 2016, the Company had $20.2 million available for borrowing under the Facility.

Commitment fees of 0.50% per annum are payable on the portion of the Facility capacity not in use at any given time on the line of credit. Commitment fees are included as interest in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Facility’s principal financial covenants, pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, included:

Consolidated Leverage Ratio – The Facility requires that the Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio, determined at the end of each fiscal quarter, not to exceed 3.50 to 1.00 from July 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and not to exceed 3.25 to 1.00 on January 1, 2018 and thereafter. The Consolidated Leverage Ratio is defined as the outstanding indebtedness divided by Consolidated EBITDA for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on or immediately prior to such date. Indebtedness is defined under the Facility for financial covenant purposes as: (a) all obligations of DXP for borrowed money including but not limited to obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or other similar instruments; (b) obligations to pay deferred purchase price of property or services; (c) capital lease obligations; (d) obligations under conditional sale or other title retention agreements relating to property purchased; and (e) contingent obligations for funded indebtedness. At September 30, 2016, the Company’s Leverage Ratio was 6.14 to 1.00, but the Facility does not require compliance with a Consolidated Leverage Ratio from June 30, 2016 through June 30, 2017.

Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio – The Facility requires that the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio on the last day of each quarter be not less than 1.25 to 1.00 from July 1, 2017 and thereafter, with “Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio” defined as the ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA for the period of 4 consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such date minus capital expenditures during such period (excluding acquisitions) minus income tax expense paid minus the aggregate amount of restricted payments defined in the agreement to (b) the interest expense paid in cash, scheduled principal payments in respect of long-term debt and the current portion of capital lease obligations for such 12-month period, determined in each case on a consolidated basis for DXP and its subsidiaries. At September 30, 2016, the Company's Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio was 0.67 to 1.00, but the Facility does not require compliance with a Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio from June 30, 2016 through June 30, 2017.

Asset Coverage Ratio – The Facility requires that the Asset Coverage Ratio at any time be not less than 0.95 to 1.00 from June 30, 2016 and thereafter, with “Asset Coverage Ratio” defined as the ratio of (a) the sum of 85% of net accounts receivable plus 65% of net inventory to (b) the aggregate outstanding amount of the revolving credit on such date and excluding the Permitted Overadvance Facility. At September 30, 2016, the Company's Asset Coverage Ratio was 1.05 to 1.00.

 

Consolidated EBITDA as defined under the Facility for financial covenant purposes means, without duplication, for any period the consolidated net income of DXP plus, to the extent deducted in calculating consolidated net income, depreciation, amortization (except to the extent that such non-cash charges are reserved for cash charges to be taken in the future), non-cash compensation including stock option or restricted stock expense, interest expense and income tax expense for taxes based on income, certain one-time costs associated with our acquisitions, integration costs, facility consolidation and closing costs, severance costs and expenses, write-down of cash expenses incurred in connection with the existing credit agreement and extraordinary losses less interest income and extraordinary gains. Consolidated EBITDA shall be adjusted to give pro forma effect to disposals or business acquisitions assuming that such transaction(s) had occurred on the first day of the period excluding all income statement items attributable to the assets or equity interests that are subject to such disposition made during the period and including all income statement items attributable to property or equity interests of such acquisitions permitted under the Facility.

The following table sets forth the computation of the Consolidated Leverage Ratio as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands, except for ratios):

 

The following table sets forth the computation of the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands, except for ratios):

 

The following table sets forth the computation of the Asset Coverage Ratio as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands, except for ratios):

 

Borrowings (in thousands):

 

(1)

Represents amount available to be borrowed at the indicated date under the Facility under the most restrictive covenant. The increase in the amount available to be borrowed is the result of paying down debt in 2016 combined with the reduction to the minimum Asset Coverage Ratio beginning June 30, 2016.

(2)

Th\e increase in short-term debt is due to mandatory prepayments under the Fourth Amendment to the Facility and increased scheduled principal payments.  The $55 million of mandatory prepayments and $24.5 million of scheduled principal payments were prepaid during October 2016.

 

Performance Metrics (in days):

 

Accounts receivable days of sales outstanding were 65.4 days at September 30, 2016 compared to 60.1 days at September 30, 2015. The 5.3 days increase was primarily due to slower payment times by oil and gas customers. Inventory turns were 6.7 times at September 30, 2016 compared to 8.0 times at September 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily related to our 2016 organic sales decline, which resulted in sales decreasing faster than inventory decreased.

Funding Commitments

We believe our cash generated from operations will meet our normal working capital needs during the next twelve months. We expect we will be able to comply with the financial covenants under the Facility through and including June 30, 2017. Because the credit facility matures on March 31, 2018, and the financial covenants become more restrictive after June 30, 2017, we will need to amend the Facility, or obtain alternative financing including additional debt and/or equity during the next eighteen months. Such alternative financings may include additional bank debt or the public or private sale of debt or equity securities. In connection with any such financing, we may issue securities that substantially dilute the interests of our shareholders. We may not be able to amend the Facility or to obtain alternative financing on attractive terms, if at all.

 

Sales of Common Stock

During September 2016, the Company sold 238,858 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $26.38 per share through a Form S-3 Registration Statement. Net proceeds were approximately $6.0 million and were used to pay down debt obligations.

On October 31, 2016, the Company closed on the sale of 2,484,000 shares of stock for total net proceeds of $46.2 million after expenses. These proceeds were used to pay down debt obligations.

Share Repurchases

On December 17, 2014, DXP publicly announced an authorization from the Board of Directors that allows DXP from time to time to purchase up to 400,000 shares of DXP's common stock over 24 months. Purchases could be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. DXP has purchased 191,420 shares for $8.9 million under this authorization as of September 30, 2016. No shares were purchased during 2016.

Acquisitions

All of the Company’s acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Revenues and expenses of the acquired businesses have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements beginning on their respective dates of acquisition. The allocation of purchase price to the acquired assets and liabilities is based on estimates of fair market value.

DISCUSSION OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS POLICIES

Critical accounting and business policies are those that are both most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial position and results of operations, and require management’s subjective or complex judgments. These policies have been discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of DXP.

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“USGAAP”). The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries and its variable interest entity (“VIE”). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis as our annual consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. For a more complete discussion of our significant accounting policies and business practices, refer to the consolidated annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2016. The results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full fiscal year.

In the third quarter of 2015, DXP became the primary beneficiary of a VIE in which DXP owns 47.5% of the equity. DXP consolidates the financial statements of the VIE with the financial statements of DXP. As of September 30, 2016, the total assets of the VIE were approximately $5.2 million including approximately $4.9 million of property and equipment compared to $4.4 million of total assets and $2.9 million of property and equipment at September 30, 2015. DXP is the primary customer of the VIE. For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, consolidation of the VIE increased cost of sales by approximately $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, consolidation of the VIE increased cost of sales by approximately $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The Company recognized a related income tax benefit of $50 thousand and $185 thousand, respectively, related to the VIE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Company recognized a related income tax benefit of $130 thousand related to the VIE for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2016, the owners of the 52.5% of the equity not owned by DXP included a former executive officer and other employees of DXP.

 

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The update aims to simplify aspects of accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842): The update requires organizations that lease assets (“lessees”) to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with terms of more than 12 months. The recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee remains dependent on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The criteria for determining whether a lease is a finance or operating lease has not been significantly changed by this ASU. The ASU also requires additional disclosure of the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases, including qualitative and quantitative requirements. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The update requires entities to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The update simplifies the current guidance, which requires entities to separately present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory ("ASU 2015-11"). The amendments in ASU 2015-11 clarify the subsequent measurement of inventory requiring an entity to subsequently measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. This ASU applies only to inventory that is measured using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost method. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 should be applied prospectively and are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires entities to recognize debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, however, early adoption is permitted. DXP adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2015 and adjusted the balance sheet for all periods presented.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15), which asserts that management should evaluate whether there are relevant conditions or events that are known and reasonably knowable that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued when applicable. If conditions or events at the date the financial statements are issued raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosures are required which will enable users of the financial statements to understand the conditions or events as well as management’s evaluation and plan. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter; early application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which provides guidance on revenue recognition. The core principal of this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance requires entities to apply a five-step method to (1) identify the contract(s) with customers; (2) identify the performance obligation(s) in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation(s) in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This pronouncement was originally effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. In April 2015, the FASB approved a proposal to defer the effective date to fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3:

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Our market risk results from volatility in interest rates. Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our debt portfolio. Using floating interest rate debt outstanding at September 30, 2016 and 2015, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would result in approximately a $3.2 million and a $3.8 million change in annual interest expense, respectively. The decrease from 2015 is primarily the result of paying down debt during 2015 and 2016.

ITEM 4:

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

We have established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) by others within our organization to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2016. Based on this evaluation, as a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2016.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We did not design and maintain effective internal control over the accounting for income taxes, including the timely preparation of the income tax provision and schedules supporting the related tax assets and liabilities. Specifically, management did not design and maintain controls with a level of precision that would allow for an effective review to identify a material misstatement. This control deficiency resulted in potential adjustments to deferred tax assets and liabilities, income taxes payable and income tax expense accounts in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This control deficiency could result in a material misstatement to our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

Remediation Plans

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as part of our routine efforts to maintain adequate and effective internal control over financial reporting, we initiated and are implementing measures designed to improve our financial statement closing process and enhance certain internal controls, processes and procedures. As indicated below, a number of these initiatives relate directly to strengthening our control over accounting for income taxes and address specific control deficiencies which contributed to the material weakness discussed above. As a result of these efforts, the Company believes it has made progress as of September 30, 2016 toward remediating the underlying causes of the material weakness. Specifically, the Company has undertaken the following steps to remediate the deficiencies underlying this material weakness:

 

 

We are committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment, and believe that these remediation efforts represent significant improvements in our control environment. The identified material weakness in internal control will not be considered fully remediated until the internal controls over these areas have been in operation for a sufficient period of time for our management to conclude that the material weakness has been fully remediated. The Company will continue its efforts to implement and test the new controls in order to make this final determination.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as described above, there are no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While DXP is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, it believes that the ultimate resolution will not have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on DXP’s consolidated financial position, cash flows, or results of operations.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

The Company desires to add the following risk factors to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

None.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

 

 

Exhibits designated by the symbol * are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All exhibits not so designated are incorporated by reference to a prior filing with the Commission as indicated.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DXP ENTERPRISES, INC.

(Registrant)

By: /s/ MAC McCONNELL

Mac McConnell

Senior Vice-President/Finance and

Chief Financial Officer

(Duly Authorized Signatory and Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: November 14, 2016

 

 

---