DYNASIL CORP OF AMERICA - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 0R 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015.

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission file number: 000-27503

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 668-6855

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: none

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨   No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨   No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x   No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)

Yes ¨ No x

As of March 31, 2015, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $13,065,449.

As of December 7, 2015 there were 16,625,794 shares of common stock, par value $0.0005 per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on February 25, 2016 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

PART I

This annual report on Form 10-K contains or incorporates by reference not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. We refer you to the information under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements."

As used in this annual report on Form 10-K, references to "Dynasil," the "Company," "we," "our" or "us," unless the context otherwise requires, refer to Dynasil Corporation of America and our subsidiaries.

All trademarks or trade names referred to in this report are the property of their respective owners.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

Dynasil Corporation of America was founded as a New Jersey corporation in 1960 and incorporated in the state of Delaware through a migratory merger in March 2008. Our corporate headquarters are located at 313 Washington Street, Suite 403, Newton, MA 02458, and our corporate website is www.dynasil.com. You can access, free of charge, our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any other amendments to those reports, through a link at our website, or at the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

We have three reporting segments based on our main operating activities, as well as a fourth segment substantially all of the assets of which were sold in the first quarter of 2014. Below is a summary of these segments:

For information about our segments and geographical information about our operating revenues and assets, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.

Our business strategy is based on continued development and expansion of our funded research portfolio, investment in the commercialization of the technologies originating from our Contract Research segment, organic growth of existing Optics segment products, continuing development of the Xcede medical technologies using outside funding and acquisitions that align with our core competencies.

Historical Growth by Acquisition

Through a series of acquisitions beginning in March 2005, Dynasil has evolved from a single product line optics company to one focused on multiple optical product lines and a significant contract research business focused on advanced materials used in radiation detection and other advanced instrumentation. Our revenue has increased from $2 million in FY 2004 to $40 million in FY 2015.

The acquisitions we completed during this period included:

Contract Research – the Science Behind our Technology

Our Contract Research segment’s business unit, RMD, is among the largest small business participants in U.S. government-funded research, performing research and development activities for government agencies including Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, National Institutes of Health and NASA.

RMD develops advanced technology in materials, sensors and prototype instruments that detect or measure radiation, light, magnetism or sound for use in security, medical and industrial applications. RMD has research expertise in material science, radiation detection, digital imaging technology, magnetic imaging, laser optics and photonics. As of September 30, 2015, our Contract Research segment had a total of 86 employees, including 32 Ph.D. level scientists. RMD serves as an incubator to expand our patent portfolio enabling the opportunity to advance our technology from development to commercialization using government-funded research. As of September 30, 2015, RMD had a portfolio of 61 issued U.S. patents and 53 pending patent applications, compared with 56 issued patents and 48 pending patent applications at the same point in 2014.

For more than 25 years, RMD has successfully conducted government research under the auspices of the Small Business Innovation Research (“SBIR”) program. In recent years, RMD has augmented its SBIR research with larger, competitively bid government research and development contracts. To grow our research portfolio within the federal government, we are broadening our relationships within key federal funding agencies and the U.S. military. RMD also provides research for non-governmental entities in areas where it has the appropriate expertise. Such research is currently not a significant portion of RMD’s revenues. Our research initiatives are aligned with our focus on the homeland security, medical and industrial markets. As of September 30, 2015, RMD had a contract backlog of approximately $33 million, of which approximately 45% is SBIR contracts.

RMD competes for contract research work against a variety of small and large entities, including universities that submit research proposals based on specific government solicitations. We generate revenues under various types of contracts, which include Cost Reimbursement, Time & Materials (T&M), Fixed Price-Level of Effort and Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contracts. We believe that RMD’s reputation for conducting state-of-the art research and development, as well as the quality of its proposals, are significant competitive advantages. In addition, RMD maintains strong working relationships with universities, government agencies, national laboratories, research hospitals and corporations. However, some of our competitors may have greater financial, technical and human resources than we have and may be better able to operate large, well-funded research and development programs.

We believe that research projects can provide an important source for new commercial products in areas such as medical imaging, industrial sensors, critical care and point of care diagnostics and homeland security. For example, Dynasil Products’ lead paint analyzer and gamma medical probes businesses, which were sold in fiscal year 2014, emanated from the RMD portfolio. Most recently, our government-funded research work supported the development of our CLYC dual-mode radiation detection technology which we are currently selling commercially.

Our Optical Technology

We specialize in the production of optical materials, components and coatings for various applications in the medical, industrial, and homeland security/defense sectors.

Our Optics segment supplies synthetic crystals, optical materials, components, and coatings that are used in devices such as baggage scanners, medical imaging systems, optical instruments, lasers, analytical instruments, automotive components, semiconductor/electronic devices, spacecraft/aircraft components and advertising displays. These products are offered through four business units (Dynasil Fused Silica, Optometrics, Hilger and EMF).

We compete for business with fabricators of industrial optical materials, other optical components manufacturers, other optical crystal manufacturers and other optical coaters as well as other analytical instruments manufacturers and synthetic crystal manufacturers. We believe our proprietary processes, reputation, specialty product offering, products in development and the price at which we offer our products enable us to successfully compete in these markets. However, many of our competitors have greater financial, sales and marketing resources than we do, which may enable them to develop and market products that would compete against those developed by us.

Our products are distributed through a direct sales and marketing staff of 11 people and through other channels, including manufacturer’s representatives and distributors in various foreign countries for international sales and U.S. manufacturers’ representatives for certain product lines. Marketing efforts include direct customer contact through sales visits, advertising in trade publications and attendance at trade shows.

Biomedical: Xcede and Our Development of a Tissue Sealant Technology

Xcede's first product candidate currently under development is a resorbable hemostatic patch to be used when conventional techniques are inadequate or impractical during general or cardiovascular surgery. As described above, in 2011, Dynasil Biomedical acquired rights to the underlying tissue sealant technology as part of a transaction with Dr. Daniel Ericson, a former hematologist at the Mayo Clinic. Since that time, Dynasil Biomedical has invested significant capital developing this tissue sealant technology, including costs to further the related intellectual property rights and to conduct animal studies.

In October 2013, Dynasil Biomedical formed a new subsidiary, Xcede, and transferred its rights in the tissue sealant technology to it. Xcede was formed as a means of focusing our development efforts on this tissue sealant technology and facilitating the third-party funding of the development costs.

Xcede issued $1.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 5% convertible notes pursuant to a note purchase agreement dated October 2013 that provided for the issuance of up to $2 million in aggregate principal amount of such notes. The notes are convertible into equity of Xcede at a 20% discount to the first equity financing of Xcede of at least $3.0 million, inclusive of the notes and interest.

In May 2015, the note purchase agreement was amended to provide for the issuance of an additional $1 million in aggregate principal amount of such notes (of which $0.6 million was issued in fiscal year 2015) and extend the notes’ maturity date. As amended, the notes are payable after June 30, 2016 upon the demand of the holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding amount of the notes. Xcede is using the net proceeds from the issuances of the notes to finance its pre-clinical research activities.

Xcede is currently seeking additional financing to complete pre-clinical testing and initiate clinical trials outside of the U.S. for its first tissue sealant product.

Through Dynasil Biomedical, we currently own approximately 90% of the outstanding equity in Xcede (approximately 69% assuming conversion of the outstanding notes described above). Xcede’s convertible note investors include Mayo Clinic Ventures, Southern Initiative Minnesota Foundation, Rochester Area Economic Development Inc., angel investors and certain members of Dynasil’s executive management team and board of directors.

Strategy to Commercialize our Technologies

Our business strategy focuses on combining our expertise in funded research, product development and technology innovation to commercialize detection and analysis equipment for the homeland security, industrial and medical markets. We are executing on this strategy by:

For example, our CLYC dual mode nuclear detection crystal technology was developed by RMD under a program for the Department of Homeland Security for use in locating nuclear bombs or nuclear materials at our nation’s ports and borders. This technology has the potential to be very important to our national security, as well as other radiation detection applications, such as nuclear power plant safety. Our dual mode detection crystals are being commercialized in cooperation with our Optics segment while RMD continues to further enhance this technology.

Our CLYC dual mode detection crystals technology is designed to be a single detector that replaces two detector subsystems – the gamma radiation detector and also the helium-3 detectors for neutrons. Increasing our value proposition is the fact that the stockpile of the chemical element helium-3, a byproduct of nuclear weapons production, is in short supply. The stockpile of helium-3 has been drawn down during the past 10 years, as the federal government has increased its use in neutron detectors to help prevent nuclear and radiological material from being smuggled into the U.S.

Intellectual Property (IP)

From October 2014 through September 2015, we have been granted six new U.S. patents and have filed 22 new patent applications. Our current portfolio, company-wide, is 63 issued and 66 pending applications, the largest percentage of which are issued to RMD. We believe that intellectual property represents an important strategic advantage for us.

Customers

We have more than 600 customers, with approximately 52% of our business concentrated in our top 10 customers. Our four largest customers are agencies and agents of the Federal government and accounted for approximately 11%, 9%, 7% and 5%, respectively, of our revenues during fiscal year 2015. Our fifth largest customer is a customer of our Optics segment and also accounted for 5% of our overall revenue during fiscal year 2015. The loss of any of these top five customers would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Generally, our customers provide purchase orders for a specific part and quantity or they provide a contract for research projects. Product orders are normally filled over a period ranging from one to six weeks. We also have blanket orders that call for monthly deliveries of predetermined amounts. Contract research projects generally run for a one to two year period.

Employees

As of September 30, 2015, we had a total of 230 employees, 215 of which are full-time. Of the total, 40 of our employees are engaged in administration, 11 are engaged in sales, 95 are engaged in research and/or engineering and 84 are engaged in manufacturing. The Company has a total of 34 Ph.D. level employees. Our operations are non-union except for a two-person union in one location.

Suppliers

Our largest supplier for materials and components is a supplier of the fused silica material that is fabricated and sold by our New Jersey facility. We believe that we have excellent relationships with our suppliers. If any of our suppliers should become unavailable to us for any reason, we believe that there are a number of potential replacements, although we might incur some delay in identifying such replacements.

Research and Development

Our RMD business unit primarily provides research and development (“R&D”) activities under government funded research contracts. The RMD business unit recognized revenues of $18.8 million and $21.9 million in fiscal years 2015 and 2014, respectively. The direct costs associated with these revenues were $10.6 million and $12.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Substantially all the Contract Research segment’s cost of revenue relates to research performed by RMD which are in turn billed to the contracting party.

R&D for our other businesses, which totaled $0.1 million in both 2015 and 2014, primarily involves new product development, changes to our manufacturing processes and the introduction of improved methods and equipment.

Government Regulation

The businesses that we operate are subject to various federal and states regulations.

Our Contract Research segment is subject to the rules and regulations applicable to government contracting, including: the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and supplements, which regulate the formation, administration and performance of U.S. Government contracts; the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations; the Procurement Integrity Act, which regulates access to competitor bids and proposal information and government source selection information, and our ability to provide compensation to certain former government officials; the Civil False Claims Act, which provides for substantial civil penalties for violations, including for submission of a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. Government for payment or approval; and the U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards, which impose accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. Government contracts.

The tissue sealant being developed by Xcede, our joint venture with Mayo Clinic, is subject to FDA regulations and approval in the United States and requires CE marking and other regulatory agency approval in other countries around the world.

Our use of radioactive materials in research and certain of our products (our dual-mode detector) subject us to laws regulating hazardous wastes under United States federal and certain state, environmental and atomic energy regulatory laws and similar laws in each jurisdiction in which our research and manufacturing facilities are located. Environmental compliance costs, which totaled $25,000 for fiscal year 2015, have not historically had a material effect on our operating results.

With respect to our intellectual property rights, we rely, and are subject to, the laws in the U.S. and abroad governing intellectual property protection.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

In your evaluation of our company and our businesses, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with the information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other documents we file with the SEC. The following factors describe the risks and uncertainties that we consider significant to the operation of our business, but should not be considered a complete listing of all potential risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our operating results, financial position or liquidity. Additionally, our business is subject to the same general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, such as the overall U.S. and global economic conditions, international conflicts, geopolitical events, changes in laws or accounting rules, fluctuations in interest and exchange rates or other disruptions of expected economic and business conditions.

Risks Related To Our Business

The Company relies on its Contract Research segment for approximately half of its revenues. A decline in or temporary suspension of U.S. Government spending, changes in federal budgetary priorities, the timing of contract awards or a restructuring of the SBIR/STTR programs may adversely affect our future revenues and limit our growth prospects.

Our Contract Research business unit, RMD, is among the largest small business participants in U.S. government-funded research, performing research and development activities for government agencies including Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, National Institutes of Health, and NASA. Historically RMD has conducted its government research contracts through the SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research Program) and the STTR (Small Business Technology Transfer Program). Though RMD has augmented its SBIR contracts with larger competitively bid government contracts in recent years, a reduction in or elimination of the SBIR or the STTR programs could result in our inability to win contracts, as we may not have the resources to compete effectively against much larger, better-funded companies. Further, a significant decline in overall U.S. Government spending, including in the areas of national security, intelligence and homeland security, a significant shift in its spending priorities, the substantial reduction or elimination of particular defense-related programs or significant delays in contract or task order awards for large programs could adversely affect our future revenues and limit our growth prospects. While the October 2013 government shutdown did not have a significant impact on the Company, a future government shutdown could result in the suspension of work on contracts in progress or in payment delays which would adversely affect our future revenues and cash flow.

The Company relies on a small number of key customers for a substantial portion of its revenues.

Ten customers accounted for approximately 52% of the Company’s revenues in 2015 and the largest four customers, all agencies of the U.S. Government, accounted for 32% of revenues. Although we have had business relationships with these customers for many years, there can be no guarantee that we will be able to win contracts with these agencies in the future. Accordingly our performance could be adversely affected by the loss of one or more of these key customers.

The U.S. Government may terminate, cancel, modify or curtail our contracts at any time prior to their completion and, if we do not replace them, we may be unable to achieve our expected future revenues and may suffer a decline in revenues.

As of September 30, 2015, our total backlog for Contract Research was approximately $33 million. Backlog consists of the portion of existing contracts yet to be performed and awards of projects by agencies in favor of RMD. Many of the U.S. Government programs in which we participate as a contractor or subcontractor may extend for several years and include one or more base years and one or more option years. These programs are normally funded on an annual basis. Under our contracts, the U.S. Government generally has the right not to exercise options to extend or expand our contracts and may otherwise terminate, cancel, modify or curtail our contracts at its convenience. Any decisions by the U.S. Government not to exercise contract options or to terminate, cancel, modify or curtail our major programs or contracts would adversely affect our revenues, revenue growth and profitability.

The U.S. Government also has the right to terminate a contract for default, in which case, we may be exposed to liability, including for excess costs incurred by the customer in procuring undelivered services and products from another source. Depending on the nature and value of the contract, a performance issue or termination for default could cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated and could harm our reputation.

Our earnings and profitability may be adversely affected by our failure to accurately estimate and manage costs, time and resources.

We generate revenues under various types of contracts, which include cost reimbursement, Time & Materials (T&M), Fixed Price-Level of Effort and Firm Fixed Price contracts (FFP). Our earnings and profitability may vary materially depending on changes in the proportionate amount of revenues derived from each type of contract, the nature of services or products provided, as well as the achievement of performance objectives and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is finally determined. Cost reimbursement and T&M contracts generally have lower profitability than FFP contracts. Our operating results in any period may also be affected, positively or negatively, by variable purchasing patterns by our customers of our more profitable proprietary products. Our failure to accurately estimate costs or the resources and technology needed to perform our contracts or to effectively manage and control our costs during the performance of our work could result, and in some instances has resulted, in reduced profits or in losses. More generally, any increased or unexpected costs or unanticipated delays in connection with the performance of our contracts, including costs and delays caused by contractual disputes or other factors outside of our control, such as performance failures of our subcontractors, natural disasters or other force majeure events, could make our contracts less profitable than expected or unprofitable.

Goodwill and other intangible assets represent approximately 30% of our total assets and any impairment of these assets could negatively impact our results of operations.

Non-amortizing intangible assets, including goodwill, are tested for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Examples of events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of such intangible assets may not be recoverable could include a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, loss of key personnel, or a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of.

Any future impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets would have a negative impact on our profitability and financial results.

Our Contract Research business faces aggressive competition that can impact our ability to obtain contracts and therefore affect our future revenues and growth prospects.

RMD’s competitors include other small high technology companies performing SBIR R&D, large firms such as Raytheon which performs related R&D, universities and national laboratories.

The markets in which we operate are characterized by rapid technology development and the needs of our customers change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our success depends on our ability to develop services and products that address these changing needs and to provide people and technology needed to deliver these services and products. To remain competitive, we must consistently provide superior service, technology and performance on a cost-effective basis to our customers. Our competitors may be able to provide our customers with different or greater capabilities or technologies or better contract terms than we can provide, including technical qualifications, past contract experience, geographic presence, price and the availability of qualified professional personnel. In addition, our competitors may consolidate or establish teaming or other relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase their ability to address customers’ needs. Accordingly, larger or new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge which may adversely affect our ability to compete.

Our business is subject to reviews, audits and cost adjustments by the U.S. Government, which, if resolved unfavorably to us, could adversely affect our profitability, cash position or growth prospects.

U.S. Government agencies, including the DCAA (Defense Contract Audit Agency), DCMA (Defense Contract Management Agency) and others, routinely audit and review a contractor’s performance on government contracts, indirect rates and pricing practices, and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of the contractor’s compliance with government standards for its accounting and management internal control systems, including: control environment and overall accounting system, estimating system, purchasing system, property system and earned value management system. Both contractors and the U.S. Government agencies conducting these audits and reviews have come under increased scrutiny.

A finding of significant control deficiencies in our system audits or other reviews could result in decremented billing rates to our U.S. Government customers until the control deficiencies are corrected and our corrections are accepted by the auditing agency. Government audits and reviews may conclude that our practices are not consistent with applicable laws and regulations and result in adjustments to contract costs and mandatory customer refunds. Such adjustments can be applied retroactively, which could result in significant customer refunds. Our receipt of adverse audit findings or the failure to obtain an “approved” determination of our various accounting and management internal control systems, including our changes to indirect cost and direct labor estimating systems, from the responsible U.S. Government agency could significantly and adversely affect our business, including our ability to bid on new contracts and our competitive position in the bidding process. A determination of non-compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards could also result in the U.S. Government imposing penalties and sanctions against us, including withholding of payments, suspension of payments and increased government scrutiny that could delay or adversely affect our ability to invoice and receive timely payment on contracts, perform contracts or compete for contracts with the U.S. Government. We may suffer harm to our reputation if allegations of impropriety are made against us, which would impair our ability to win new contract awards or receive contract renewals.

Our indirect cost audits by the DCAA have been completed for fiscal 2011 while fiscal years 2012 through 2015 remain open pending DCAA audit. Although we have recorded contract revenues subsequent to fiscal 2011 based upon our estimate of costs that we believe will be approved upon final audit or review, we do not know the outcome of any ongoing or future audits or reviews and adjustments and, if future adjustments exceed our estimates, our profitability would be adversely affected.

Our failure to comply with a variety of complex procurement rules and regulations could result in our being liable for penalties, including termination of our U.S. Government contracts, disqualification from bidding on future U.S. Government contracts and suspension or debarment from U.S. Government contracting.

We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of U.S. Government contracts, which affect how we do business with our customers and may impose added costs on our business. Some significant statutes and regulations that affect us include:

Our failure to comply with any of these rules or regulations could result in loss of business or penalties that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Our loan agreements impose restrictions on our ability to take certain corporate actions and raise additional capital, and include a material adverse change (“MAC”) clause.

Our loan agreements contain numerous customary restrictions that limit our ability to undertake certain activities without the express prior written approval of our lenders. These include, but are not limited to, restricting our ability to:

These restrictions could significantly hamper our ability to raise additional capital. Our ability to receive the necessary approvals is largely dependent upon our relationship with our lenders and our financial performance, and no assurances can be given that we will be able to obtain the necessary approvals in the future. Our inability to raise additional capital could lead to working capital deficits that could have a material adverse effect on our operations in future periods.

One of our loan agreements also includes a MAC clause which permits the bank to call the loan if any event, fact, circumstance, change in, or effect on the Company could reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to the business.

We may not be able to generate sufficient positive cash flow in the future to fund our operations.

In addition to our bank financing, we are dependent upon cash flow from our businesses to fund our operations. It is our expectation that we can continue to increase our cash flows; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to do so. If we are unable to fund our operations from future cash flows together with our available bank financing, we will need to seek additional debt and/or equity financing, which may not be available on attractive terms, if at all, in which case there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our Xcede joint venture requires further funding to support the development of its technology.

Xcede has initiated financing efforts and has raised approximately $2.0 million of funding from external investors (including officers and directors of the Company) as of September 30, 2015. We expect Xcede will continue to require periodic investor funding in amounts larger than what has been raised to date in order to pursue clinical trials and further development of its tissue sealant technology. To the extent Xcede is successful in raising additional equity financing from outside sources, our equity interest in Xcede will decrease. There can be no assurance, however, that Xcede will be able to obtain future financing as needed or on terms which are attractive, in which case it might be required to close its operations and liquidate its assets in which case our investment would likely not be recovered.

Our failure to attract, train and retain skilled employees, including our management team, would adversely affect our ability to execute our strategy.

Portions of our business involve the development of tailored solutions for our customers, a process that relies heavily upon the expertise and services of our employees. Our continued success depends on our ability to recruit and retain highly trained and skilled engineering, technical and professional personnel. Competition for skilled personnel is intense and competitors aggressively recruit key employees. Particularly in highly specialized areas, it has become more difficult to retain employees and meet all of our needs for employees in a timely manner, which may affect our growth in the current fiscal year and in future years. Although we intend to continue to devote significant resources to recruit, train and retain qualified employees, we may not be able to attract and retain these employees. Any failure to do so could impair our ability to perform our contractual obligations efficiently and timely meet our customers’ needs and win new business, which could adversely affect our future results.

In addition to attracting and retaining qualified engineering, technical and professional personnel, we believe that our success will also depend on the continued employment of a highly qualified and experienced senior management team and its ability to retain existing business and generate new business. Our senior management team is important to our business because personal reputations and individual business relationships are a critical element of retaining and obtaining customer contracts in our industry, particularly with agencies performing classified operations. Our inability to hire and retain appropriately qualified and experienced senior executives could cause us to lose customers or new business opportunities.

Misconduct of employees, subcontractors, agents and business partners could cause us to lose existing contracts or customers and adversely affect our ability to obtain new contracts and customers and could have a significant adverse impact on our business and reputation.

Misconduct, should it occur, could include fraud or other improper activities such as falsifying time or other records and violations of laws, including the Anti-Kickback Act. Other examples could include the failure to comply with our policies and procedures or with federal, state or local government procurement regulations, regulations regarding the use and safeguarding of classified or other protected information, legislation regarding the pricing of labor and other costs in government contracts, laws and regulations relating to environmental, health or safety matters, bribery of foreign government officials, import-export control, lobbying or similar activities, and any other applicable laws or regulations. Intentional or unintentional violation of the Export Control Act or ITAR could result in severe fines which could adversely affect our profitability. Any data loss or information security lapses resulting in the compromise of personal information or the improper use or disclosure of sensitive or classified information could result in claims, remediation costs, regulatory sanctions against us, loss of current and future contracts and serious harm to our reputation. Although we have implemented policies, procedures and controls to prevent and detect these activities, these precautions may not prevent all misconduct, and as a result, we could face unknown risks or losses. Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or misconduct by any of our employees, subcontractors, agents or business partners could damage our reputation and subject us to fines and penalties, restitution or other damages, loss of security clearance, loss of current and future customer contracts and suspension or debarment from contracting with federal, state or local government agencies, any of which would adversely affect our business and our future results.

Quality problems with our processes, goods, and services could harm our reputation for producing high-quality products and erode our competitive advantage, sales and market share.

Quality is extremely important to us and our customers due to the serious and costly consequences of product failure. Our quality certifications are critical to the marketing success of our goods and services. If we fail to meet these standards, our reputation could be damaged, we could lose customers, and our revenue and results of operations could decline. Aside from specific customer standards, our success depends generally on our ability to manufacture to exact tolerances precision-engineered components, subassemblies, and finished devices from multiple materials. If our components fail to meet these standards or fail to adapt to evolving standards, our reputation as a manufacturer of high-quality components will be harmed, our competitive advantage could be damaged, and we could lose customers and market share.

From time to time we may make acquisitions. The failure to successfully integrate future acquisitions could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

One component of our growth strategy is to selectively pursue strategic acquisitions. These transactions require significant investment of time and resources and may disrupt our business and distract our management from other responsibilities. Even if successful, these transactions could reduce earnings for a number of reasons, including the amortization of intangible assets, impairment charges, acquired operations that are not yet profitable or the payment of additional consideration under earn-out arrangements if an acquisition performs better than expected. Acquisitions, investments and joint ventures pose many other risks that could adversely affect our reputation, operations or financial results, including:

If our acquisitions fail, perform poorly or their value is otherwise impaired for any reason, including contractions in credit markets and global economic conditions, our business and financial results could be adversely affected.

In addition, we periodically divest businesses, including businesses that are no longer a part of our ongoing strategic plan. These divestitures similarly require significant investment of time and resources, may disrupt our business, distract management from other responsibilities and may result in losses on disposal or continued financial involvement in the divested business, including through indemnification, guarantee or other financial arrangements, for a period of time following the transaction, which would adversely affect our financial results.

Our financial results may vary significantly from period-to-period.

Our financial results may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. For these reasons, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Our financial results may be negatively affected by any of the risk factors listed in this “Risk Factors” section and other matters described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other documents we file with the SEC.

Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, in both the U.S. and U.K. We are subject to tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes of these audits could have a material impact on our consolidated earnings and financial condition. Additionally, changes in tax laws or tax rulings could materially impact our effective tax rate.

We face risks associated with our international business.

In 2015 and 2014, we generated approximately 35% and 20% of our sales outside the U.S. Our international business operations may be subject to additional and different risks than our U.S. business. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitable growth in international markets is subject to risks related to the differing legal, political, social and regulatory requirements and economic conditions of many countries. As a result of our expansion outside the U.S., we are subject to certain inherent risks, including political and economic uncertainty, inflation rates, exchange rates, trade protection measures, local labor conditions and laws, restrictions on foreign investments and repatriation of earnings, and weak intellectual property protection. If we are unable to manage these risks it would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Increases in prices and declines in the availability of raw materials could negatively impact our financial results.

Our financial results are significantly affected by the cost of raw materials and energy. Most of the raw materials and energy used in production are purchased from outside sources, and the Company has made, and plans to continue to make, supply arrangements to meet the planned operating requirements for the future. Supply of critical raw materials and energy is managed by establishing contracts, multiple sources, and identifying alternative materials or technology whenever possible. An inability to obtain critical raw materials would adversely impact our ability to produce products. Increases in the cost of raw materials and energy may have an adverse effect on our earnings or cash flow in the event we are unable to mitigate these higher costs in a timely manner.

Our business and operations expose us to numerous legal and regulatory requirements and any violation of these requirements could harm our business.

We are subject to numerous federal, state and foreign legal requirements on matters as diverse as data privacy and protection, employment and labor relations, immigration, taxation, anticorruption, import/export controls, trade restrictions, internal and disclosure control obligations, securities regulation, environmental and anti-competition. We are also focused on expanding our business in certain identified growth areas, such as homeland security and biomedical technologies, which are highly regulated and may expose us to increased compliance risk. Compliance with diverse and changing legal requirements is costly, time-consuming and requires significant resources. Violations of one or more of these requirements in the conduct of our business could result in significant fines and other damages, criminal sanctions against us or our officers, prohibitions on doing business and damage to our reputation. Violations of these regulations or contractual obligations related to regulatory compliance in connection with the performance of customer contracts could also result in liability for significant monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution, unfavorable publicity and other reputational damage, restrictions on our ability to compete for certain work and allegations by our customers that we have not performed our contractual obligations.

Moreover, we use controlled hazardous and radioactive materials in our business and generate wastes that are regulated as hazardous wastes under United States federal and certain state, environmental and atomic energy regulatory laws and similar laws in each jurisdiction in which our facilities are located. Our use of these substances and materials is subject to stringent, and periodically changing, regulation that can impose costly compliance obligations on us and have the potential to adversely affect our manufacturing activities. The risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be completely eliminated. If an accident with these substances occurs, we could be held liable for any damages that result, in addition to incurring clean-up costs and liabilities, which can be substantial. Additionally, an accident could damage our research and manufacturing facilities resulting in delays and increased costs.

Our insurance may be insufficient to protect us from product and other liability claims or losses.

We maintain insurance coverage with third-party insurers as part of our overall risk management strategy and because some of our contracts require us to maintain specific insurance coverage limits. However, not every risk or liability is or can be protected by insurance, and, for those risks we insure, the limits of coverage we purchase or that are reasonably obtainable in the market may not be sufficient to cover all actual losses or liabilities incurred. If any of our third-party insurers fail, cancel our coverage or otherwise are unable to provide us with adequate insurance coverage, then our overall risk exposure and our operational expenses would increase and the management of our business operations would be disrupted. Our insurance may be insufficient to protect us from significant product and other liability claims or losses. Moreover, there is a risk that commercially available liability insurance will not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, if at all. If liability claims or losses exceed our current or available insurance coverage, our business and prospects may be harmed. Regardless of the adequacy of our liability insurance coverage, any significant claim may have an adverse effect on our industry and market reputation, leading to a substantial decrease in demand for our products and services and reduced revenues.

Our business and financial results could be negatively affected by cyber or other security threats.

As a U.S. Government contractor operating in multiple regulated industries and geographies, we handle sensitive information. Therefore, we are continuously exposed to cyber and other security threats, including computer viruses, attacks by hackers or physical break-ins. Any electronic or physical break-in or other security breach or compromise may jeopardize security of information stored or transmitted through our information technology systems and networks. This could lead to disruptions in mission critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data. Although we have implemented policies, procedures and controls to protect against, detect and mitigate these threats, attempts by others to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems are becoming more sophisticated. These attempts include covertly introducing malware to our computers and networks and impersonating authorized users, among others, and may be perpetrated by well-funded organized crime or state sponsored efforts. We seek to detect and investigate all security incidents and to prevent their occurrence or recurrence. We continue to improve our threat protection, detection and mitigation policies, procedures and controls. In addition, we work with other companies in the industry and government participants on increased awareness and enhanced protections against cyber security threats. However, because of the evolving nature of these security threats, there can be no assurance that our policies, procedures and controls have or will detect or prevent any of these threats and we cannot predict the full impact of any such incident. We may experience similar security threats to the information technology systems that we develop, install or maintain under customer contracts. Although we work cooperatively with our customers and other business partners to seek to minimize the impacts of cyber and other security threats, we must rely on the safeguards put in place by those entities. Any remedial costs or other liabilities related to cyber or other security threats may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means. Occurrence of any of these security threats could adversely affect our reputation, ability to work on sensitive U.S. Government contracts, business operations and financial results.

Risks Relating To Dynasil’s Stock

Xcede, our joint venture, is a pre-clinical stage business with no approved products, which makes it difficult to assess the business’s future viability.

In October 2013, Dynasil Biomedical formed Xcede, a joint venture with Mayo Clinic, to focus on and separately fund the development of its tissue sealant technology. Xcede has not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully overcome many of the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in new and rapidly evolving fields, particularly in the biomedical area. For example, to execute its business plan, Xcede will need to successfully:

If Xcede is unsuccessful in accomplishing these objectives, it may not be able to develop its tissue sealant product, raise capital, expand its business or continue its operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

The market price for our common stock is particularly volatile given our status as a relatively unknown company with a small and thinly traded public float and lack of profits, which could lead to wide fluctuations in our share price.

The market for our common stock is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to the shares of larger, more established companies that have large public floats, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than the shares of such larger, more established companies for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common stock is, compared to the shares of such larger, more established companies, sporadically and thinly traded. As a consequence of this limited liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our stockholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our common stock is sold on the market without commensurate demand. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a larger, more established company that has a large public float. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common stock will be at any time, including as to whether our common stock will sustain its current market price, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common stock for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not currently intend to do so for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your common stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in its value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which our stockholders have purchased their shares.

If our internal control over financial reporting is found not to be effective or if we make disclosure of existing or potential significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in those controls, investors could lose confidence in our financial reports, and our stock price may be adversely affected.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to include an internal control report with our Annual Report on Form 10-K. That report must include management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year. We evaluate our existing internal control over financial reporting based on the framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. During the course of our ongoing evaluation of the internal controls, we may identify areas requiring improvement, and may have to design enhanced processes and controls to address issues identified through this review. Remedying any deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that we identify may require us to incur significant costs and expend significant time and management resources. We cannot assure you that any of the measures we implement to remedy any such deficiencies will effectively mitigate or remedy such deficiencies. Investors could lose confidence in our financial reports, and our stock price may be adversely affected, if our internal controls over financial reporting are found not to be effective by management or if we make disclosure of existing or potential significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in those controls.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We own a manufacturing and office facility consisting of a one-story, masonry and steel building containing approximately 15,760 square feet in West Berlin, New Jersey. We lease a 10,000 square foot manufacturing and office building in Ayer, MA with a lease that expires in May 2025. We lease 3,600 square feet of office space in a building in Littleton, MA with a lease that expires in July 2018. We lease a 52,880 square foot manufacturing and office building in Rochester, NY with a lease that expires in March 2018. We own a two-story, 44,000 square foot manufacturing and office facility in Ithaca, New York. We own a two-story, 17,000 square foot manufacturing and office facility in Margate, Kent, in the U.K. All of the foregoing owned and leased properties are used by our Optics segment.

We lease a 40,000 square foot manufacturing, research, and office building in Watertown, MA for our RMD business from a related party with a month-to-month lease that continues until terminated by the landlord with not less than three years’ prior written notice or by the Company with not less than six months’ prior written notice. We lease 2,868 square feet of office space in Newton, MA for our Dynasil Corporation of America office with a lease that expires in December 2017. We believe that the properties are in satisfactory condition and suitable for our purposes. The New Jersey, New York, and U.K. properties are collateral against notes payable to banks.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Since September 30, 2013, the Company’s Common Stock has been listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “DYSL”. From December 17, 2010 until September 30, 2013, the Company’s Common Stock was listed on the NASDAQ Global Market. Prior to December 17, 2010, the Company’s Common Stock was quoted on the NASD-OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "DYSL.OB".

The following table reflects the range of high and low common stock sales prices for the four quarters of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market.

As of December 1, 2015 there were 16,585,794 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding held by approximately 241 holders of record.

The Company has paid no cash dividends on its common stock since its inception. The Company intends to retain any future earnings for use in its business and does not intend to pay cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following management's discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We have three reporting segments based on our main operating activities, as well as a fourth segment substantially all of the assets of which were sold in the first quarter of 2014. Below is a summary of these segments:

For information about our financial segments and geographical information about our operating revenues and assets, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report. A description of our strategy is included in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our markets are characterized by rapidly changing technology and the needs of our customers, which change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our success depends on our ability to develop services and products that address these changing needs and to provide the people and technology needed to deliver these services and products. To remain competitive, we must consistently provide superior service, technology and performance on a cost-effective basis to our customers. Our business performance also is influenced by a variety of other factors including, but not limited to, economic conditions, U.S. Government spending on research and development programs, competition, regulatory requirements and insurance costs. Further information on certain risks to our Company is included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Fiscal 2015 Financial Overview

Our revenue declined $1.8 million to $40.5 million in 2015 compared to $42.3 million in 2014. Approximately $0.8 million of the decrease is a result of the sale of the lead paint detector and gamma medical probe businesses in the first quarter of 2014. In addition, Contract Research segment revenues declined $3.2 million or 15% to $18.8 million in 2015 while our Optics segment revenues increased $2.2 million or 11% to $21.8 million in 2015.

In fiscal year 2015, we incurred a net loss of $0.4 million compared to a net income of $2.0 million in 2014. The net loss in 2015 includes a $0.4 million charge for the final termination and settlement of a subsidiary’s pension plan as well as a $0.2 million gain on the sale of a product line while the net income in 2014 included a $1.3 million gain from the sale of two businesses. Excluding the pension charge and the gain on sale of the product line in 2015 and the gain on the sale of the two businesses in 2014, our net loss was $0.2 million in 2015 compared to net income of $0.7 million in 2014.

Our net income (loss) included losses of approximately $1.2 million and $0.8 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively, associated with research and start-up costs of Xcede Technologies, Inc. (“Xcede”), a joint venture with Mayo, in which we own 90% of the common stock (69% assuming conversion of the outstanding notes described below). Because Dynasil has voting control of Xcede via its common stock ownership, Xcede is required to be included in our consolidated net income for financial reporting purposes.

The majority of the funding for Xcede in 2015 and 2014 was from the sale of approximately $2.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Xcede Convertible Notes to external investors (including certain officers and directors of the Company). Although it is anticipated that the Company will continue for the foreseeable future to hold a significant interest in Xcede, the Company expects that its interest will decrease over time, if and to the extent that Xcede is successful in raising equity financing from outside sources.

Significant Transactions

On November 7, 2013, the Company sold its lead paint detector business to Protec Instrument Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Protec”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Laboratoires Protec S.A., a French corporation and former European distributor of the lead paint detector products. The sales price totaled approximately $1.2 million, less certain adjustments and including the assumption of certain liabilities by Protec. On December 23, 2013, the Company sold its gamma medical probe business to Dilon Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Dilon”), for $3.5 million, the assumption of certain liabilities of the Company, and a possible contingent payment. The Company used $4.9 million of the proceeds from the two transactions to reduce its bank indebtedness.

On June 26, 2014, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of DichroTec Thin Films, LLC (“DichroTec”), a manufacturer of optical thin film coatings, for $1.7 million consisting of $500,000 in cash and 700,000 shares of our common stock. The assets acquired consisted primarily of machinery and equipment and inventory. DichroTec reported unaudited revenue of approximately $1.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.

Results of Operations

Revenue

Revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 were $40.5 million, down $1.8 million or 4% from the $42.3 million of revenue recorded in 2014.

Contract Research segment revenues decreased 15% to $18.8 million in 2015 from $21.9 million in 2014, reflecting continuing softness in Federal Agency contracting, including both award and funding decisions. The contract revenue backlog has increased slightly from $30 million in 2014 to $33 million in 2015 of which approximately 45% is SBIR grants. The Company continues to seek to diversify its contracting sources and to limit its reliance on both the SBIR program and the limited number of government agencies that currently contract for its research. This diversification also includes contract research for commercial businesses rather than governmental agencies.

The revenues of our Optics segment increased 11% to $21.8 million from $19.6 million in 2014. Three of the four business units in the Optics segment achieved revenue growth in 2015 due to increases in volume. In addition, the DichroTec acquisition discussed above contributed approximately $1.5 million to the revenues of the Optics segment in 2015.

The Instruments segment, of which substantially all of the assets were disposed of in the first quarter of 2014 as discussed above, had no revenues in 2015 and $0.8 million in revenues in 2014.

The Biomedical segment is engaged in development of a tissue sealant product through its Xcede joint venture and currently has no revenues.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for fiscal year 2015 decreased $1.5 million or 9% to $15.3 million from the prior year amount of $16.7 million. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 38% in 2015 from 40% in 2014 primarily as a result of lower gross profit margins in the Optics segment associated with higher scrap levels experienced during the scaling-up of production for a large customer.

Gross profit for the Contract Research segment declined $1.1 million to $8.2 million in 2015 from $9.3 million in 2014 as a result of a decrease in the volume of direct labor hours billed while gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 44% in 2015 from 42% in 2014.

The Optics segment’s gross profit remained essentially unchanged at $7.1 million in both 2015 and 2014 while gross profit as a percentage of revenue dropped to 33% in 2015 from 36% in 2014 primarily as a result of increased costs associated with higher scrap levels experienced during the scaling-up of production for a large customer. The Company has implemented changes to its manufacturing processes and upgraded certain capital equipment during the second half of fiscal year 2015 and, as a result, expects production yields in the Optics segment to improve in fiscal year 2016.

Selling, General & Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

SG&A expenses remained essentially unchanged at $15.3 million or 38% of revenue in fiscal year 2015, from $15.3 million or 36% of revenue in fiscal year 2014. Excluding the SG&A expenses associated with the Instruments segment, the assets and business of which were substantially disposed of in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, SG&A expenses increased 3% to $15.3 million in 2015 compared to $14.8 million in 2014.

Contract Research SG&A decreased to $7.6 million or 41% of revenue in fiscal 2015 from $8.5 million or 39% of revenue in the prior year. The lower SG&A expense in 2015 was primarily a result of the full year impact of cost savings measures implemented during 2014 in response to the decline in government spending and contract awards.

SG&A within the Optics segment increased 19% to $6.5 million in 2015 from $5.5 million in 2014 primarily due to higher expenses associated with increases in research and marketing costs at certain of the business units as well the impact of SG&A costs associated with the DichroTec acquisition completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2014.

Finally, SG&A costs in the Biomedical segment in fiscal year 2015 were approximately $1.2 million as compared to $0.8 million in fiscal year 2014. The costs in 2015 and 2014 were substantially all a result of spending by the Xcede joint venture on its development of the tissue sealant technology.

In fiscal years 2014 and 2015, Xcede raised approximately $1.4 million and $0.6 million of funding, respectively, from external investors, including certain officers and directors of the Company, through the issuance of convertible notes. We expect Xcede will continue to require periodic external investor funding in amounts larger than what has been raised to date in order to pursue clinical trials and regulatory approvals of its tissue sealant technology. We are continuing to explore the availability of outside financing, including through a sale, licensing or joint venture, though we may not be able to secure any such financing arrangement on favorable terms or at all.

Net Interest Expense

Net interest expense decreased 31% to $0.5 million in 2015 from $0.7 million in fiscal 2014, primarily as a result of the debt refinancing completed in the third quarter of 2014 that allowed us to regain compliance with our Massachusetts Capital Resources Company debt covenants. The Company had been accruing interest on this debt at the default rate of 14% rather than the normal rate of 10% since it suspended interest payments in February 2013. Additionally, the Company implemented a cash sweep program during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 which reduced borrowings and interest expense under its secured line of credit.

Income Tax Credit

Total income tax credit decreased from a tax credit of ($21,000) in fiscal 2014 to a tax credit of ($6,000) in fiscal 2015. The decrease in the credit is due to a decrease in foreign tax credits substantially offset by a decrease in state income taxes.

Net Income

As a result, the Company had a net loss of $0.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2015 compared to net income of $2.0 million in the prior year. The net loss in fiscal 2015 includes a $0.4 million charge for the final termination and settlement of a subsidiary’s pension plan as well as a $0.2 million gain on the sale of a product line while the net income in 2014 included a $1.3 million gain from the sale of two businesses. Excluding the pension charge and the gain on the sale of the product line in 2015 and the gain on the sale of the two businesses in 2014, our net loss would have been $0.2 million in 2015 compared to net income of $0.7 million in 2014.

Our net income (loss) includes approximately $1.2 million and $0.8 million of losses in 2015 and 2014, respectively from our Biomedical segment. Substantially all of the Biomedical losses in 2015 and 2014 were funded through the proceeds from Xcede’s convertible notes offerings in fiscal years 2015 and 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity Overview

As of September 30, 2015, the Company is in compliance with the terms of all its outstanding indebtedness. As of such date, the Company had total indebtedness consisting of:

In addition, the Company had net cash as of September 30, 2015 of $1.3 million, which was a decrease of $2.5 million as compared to $3.8 million at September 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily the result of cash utilized to repay $2.0 million of subordinated debt owed to Massachusetts Capital Resources Company (“MCRC”) and $0.6 million of cash utilized to pay down the Company’s revolving line of credit during fiscal 2015.

The Company believes that its cash on hand and its borrowing capacity under its revolving line of credit will be sufficient to fund its current debt obligations, estimated capital expenditures and working capital needs for the next twelve months.

On May 1, 2014, the Company entered into a three year revolving line of credit arrangement with Middlesex Savings Bank (“Middlesex”) for up to $4.0 million with the amount available for advances determined monthly based on eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable and inventory.

The Middlesex line of credit is secured by substantially all the Company’s personal property and certain of the Company’s equity interests in its foreign subsidiary, and is guaranteed by all of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. The interest rate under the line of credit note is equal to the Prime Rate, but in no event less than 3.25%. The Middlesex loan agreement provides that the loan expires on May 1, 2017, at which time all outstanding principal and unpaid interest shall become due and payable.

The Middlesex line of credit was amended on September 29, 2015 to allow the Company to repay up to $3 million of the subordinated debt owed to MCRC and also provides for the Company, if it meets certain conditions, to convert up to $2 million of the advances under the line of credit to a fixed rate note with the principal amortizing monthly over a five year term.

Effective October 1, 2015, MCRC agreed to reduce the interest rate on its remaining outstanding indebtedness to 6% from 10% and to amend the principal repayment terms to provide for repayment of the remaining $1 million outstanding on a monthly basis over two years beginning on September 30, 2016.

In May 2015, the terms of the convertible notes were amended to provide for an additional $1 million of Convertible Notes issuances and to extend the notes maturity date. The terms of the convertible notes now provide that the notes are payable upon the demand of the holders of a majority of the aggregate outstanding amount of the notes, after June 30, 2016.

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.8 million for fiscal year 2015 versus $1.9 million for fiscal year 2014. In 2015, the principal differences between the net loss of $0.4 million and net cash provided of $0.8 million are for stock compensation expense of $0.5 million, depreciation and amortization of $1.2 million, pension expense of $0.4 million and a gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment of ($0.2) million while changes to the short term asset and liability amounts in our balance sheet used $1.0 million.

In 2014, the principal differences between the net income of $2.0 million and the net cash provided of $1.9 million are stock compensation expense of $0.5 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $1.1 million and a gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment of $1.3 million while changes to the short term asset and liability amounts in our balance sheet used $0.6 million.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash flows from investing activities were a use of $1.1 million for fiscal 2015 compared with a generation of $2.4 million for fiscal 2014. The use in fiscal 2015 was primarily a result of the purchase of property, plant and equipment while fiscal 2014 activities included $4.3 million of proceeds from the sale of the lead paint detector and gamma medical probe businesses partially offset by the $0.5 million cash payment in connection with the DichroTec acquisition and other machinery and equipment and leasehold improvement expenditures of $1.4 million. The Company currently plans for capital expenditures of $2.0 million during fiscal year 2016, depending on the availability of cash and/or financing.

Substantially all of the $1.2 million Biomedical loss in 2015 and the $0.8 million Biomedical loss in 2014 were funded using the proceeds from Xcede’s convertible notes offerings during 2014 and 2015 which raised an aggregate of $2.0 million.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows from financing activities used $2.3 million of net cash in fiscal 2015, primarily in connection with the prepayment of $2.0 million of subordinated debt to Massachusetts Capital Resources Company and the $0.6 million pay down of the Middlesex revolving line of credit. The Company’s Xcede joint venture raised $0.6 million in convertible notes in 2015. The Company implemented a cash sweep process in 2015 which resulted in the full repayment of the line of credit for a period before the new borrowings were incurred in connection with the $2.0 million prepayment of the subordinated debt to MCRC.

Terms of Outstanding Indebtedness

The following is summary of the terms of the existing loan agreement in place with the Company’s senior lender, Middlesex Savings Bank, and the terms of subordinated debt owed to Massachusetts Capital Resources Company.

Middlesex Savings Bank Loan Agreement

On May 1, 2014, Dynasil entered into a loan and security agreement (the “Bank Loan Agreement”) and line of credit note (the “Note”) with Middlesex Savings Bank pursuant to which Middlesex agreed to provide up to $4 million, subject to the availability restrictions described below, under a revolving line of credit loan to Dynasil for general corporate purposes. The Bank Loan Agreement provides that the loan expires on May 1, 2017, at which time all outstanding principal and unpaid interest shall become due and payable.

The Bank Loan Agreement and the Note are secured by (i) a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s personal property and (ii) sixty-five percent (65%) of the Company’s equity interests in its UK subsidiary, Hilger Crystals, Ltd. Under the note, the borrowing base is determined monthly based on eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable and eligible inventory. The interest rate under the Note is equal to the Prime Rate, but in no event less than 3.25%.

The Bank Loan Agreement also contains other terms, conditions and provisions that are customary for commercial lending transactions of this sort. The Bank Loan Agreement requires Dynasil, at the close of each fiscal quarter, to maintain a Debt Service Coverage ratio, as defined, of at least 1.20 to 1.00 on a trailing four quarter basis.

The Bank Loan Agreement was amended on September 29, 2015 to allow the Company to repay up to $3 million of the subordinated debt owed Massachusetts Capital Resources Company (“MCRC”) and also provide for the Company, if it meets certain conditions, to convert up to $2 million of the advances under the line of credit to a fixed rate note with the principal amortizing monthly over a five year term.

The Bank Loan Agreement provides for events of default customary for credit facilities of this type, including but not limited to non-payment, defaults on other debt, misrepresentation, breach of covenants, representations and warranties, insolvency and bankruptcy, change of management, as defined and the occurrence of a material adverse change, as defined. As a result of the material adverse change clause, the line of credit has been classified as a current liability.

Note Purchase Agreement – Massachusetts Capital Resource Company

On July 31, 2012, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with MCRC. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company issued and sold to MCRC a $3.0 million subordinated note (the “Subordinated Note”) for proceeds of $3.0 million. The Subordinated Note initially matured on July 31, 2017, unless accelerated pursuant to an event of default, as described below. The Subordinated Note initially provided for interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, with interest to be payable monthly on the last day of each calendar month in each year, the first such payment to be due and payable on August 31, 2012. Under the original terms of the Agreement, beginning on and with September 30, 2015, and on the last day of each calendar month thereafter through and including July 31, 2017, the Company would redeem, without premium, $130,000 in principal amount of the Subordinated Note together with all accrued and unpaid interest then due on the amount redeemed.

Effective October 1, 2015, in connection with the prepayment of $2 million of the Subordinated Note, MCRC agreed to adjust the interest rate to 6% and to amend the principal repayment terms such that beginning on September 30, 2016, the Company will redeem monthly, without premium, $43,478 in principal amount of the Subordinated Note together with all accrued and unpaid interest then due on the amount redeemed.

Under the terms of the Agreement and a Subordination Agreement dated July 31, 2012, MCRC and any successor holder of the Subordinated Note have agreed that the payment of the principal of and interest on the Subordinated Note shall be subordinated in right of payment, to the prior payment in full of all indebtedness of the Company for money borrowed from banks or other institutional lenders at any time outstanding.

The Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants by the Company limiting additional indebtedness, liens, guaranties, mergers and consolidations, substantial asset sales, investments and loans, sale and leasebacks, transactions with affiliates and fundamental changes. In addition, the Agreement contains financial covenants by the Company (as further defined in the Agreement) that (i) impose a Consolidated Maximum Leverage Ratio (consolidated total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA) equal to or less than 4.5 to 1.0 for each rolling four quarter period ending on or after March 31, 2013, and (ii) require a Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (consolidated EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges) of not less than 0.95 to 1.00 for each rolling four quarter period ending on or after September 30, 2013.

The Agreement also provides for events of default customary for agreements of this type, including, but not limited to, non-payment, breach of covenants, insolvency and defaults on other debt. Upon an event of default, MCRC may elect to declare all obligations (including principal, interest and all others amounts payable) immediately due and payable, which shall occur automatically if the Company becomes insolvent.

“Off Balance Sheet” Arrangements

The Company has no “Off Balance Sheet” arrangements.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the respective dates of adoption or expected adoption and effects on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We have identified the following as the items that require the most significant judgment and often involve complex estimation: revenue recognition, valuation of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, estimating allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, stock-based compensation and accounting for income taxes.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales of products is recognized at the time title and the risks and rewards of ownership pass. Revenue is recognized when the products are shipped per customers’ instructions, the contract has been executed, the contract or sales price is fixed or determinable, delivery of services or products has occurred and the Company’s ability to collect the contract price is considered reasonably assured.

Revenue from research and development activities is derived generally from the following types of contracts: reimbursement of costs plus fees, fixed price or time and material type contracts. Government funded services revenues from cost plus contracts are recognized as costs are incurred on the basis of direct costs plus allowable indirect costs and an allocable portion of the contracts’ fixed fees. Revenue from fixed-type contracts is recognized under the percentage of completion method with estimated costs and profits included in contract revenue as work is performed. Revenues from time and materials contracts are recognized as costs are incurred at amounts generally commensurate with billing amounts. Recognition of losses on projects is taken as soon as the loss is reasonably determinable.

The majority of the Company’s contract research revenue is derived from the United States government and government related contracts. Such contracts have certain risks which include dependence on future appropriations and administrative allotment of funds and changes in government policies. Costs incurred under United States government contracts are subject to audit. The Company believes that the results of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or its results of operations.

Goodwill

Goodwill and intangible assets which have indefinite lives are subject to annual impairment tests. Goodwill is tested by reviewing the carrying value compared to the fair value at the reporting unit level. Fair value for the reporting unit is derived using the income approach. Under the income approach, fair value is calculated based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Assumptions by management are necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and economic changes and to estimate future cash flows. Management’s evaluation includes assumptions on future growth rates and cost of capital that are consistent with internal projections and operating plans.

The Company generally performs its annual impairment testing of goodwill during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. The Company tests impairment at the reporting unit level using the two-step process. The Company's primary reporting units tested for impairment are RMD, which comprises our Contract Research segment, and Hilger, which is a component of the Optics segment.

Step one of the impairment testing compares the carrying value of a reporting unit to its fair value. The carrying value represents the net book value of the net assets of the reporting unit or simply the equity of the reporting unit if the reporting unit is the entire entity. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying value, no impairment has been incurred and no further testing or analysis is necessary. The Company estimates fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology which calculates fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and includes making assumptions about projected growth rates, industry-specific factors, working capital requirements, weighted average cost of capital, and current and anticipated operating conditions. Assumptions by management are necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and economic changes. The Company's evaluation includes assumptions on future growth rates and cost of capital that are consistent with internal projections and operating plans. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows could produce different results. The Company regularly assesses the estimates based on the actual performance of each reporting unit.

If the carrying value of a reporting unit is greater than its fair value, step two of the impairment testing process is performed to determine the amount of impairment to be recognized. Step two requires the Company to estimate an implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill. An impairment then exists if the carrying value of the goodwill is greater than the goodwill's implied fair value. With respect to the Company's annual goodwill impairment testing performed during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, step one of the testing determined the estimated fair value of RMD and Hilger exceeded their carrying values by more than 20%. Accordingly, the Company concluded that no impairment had occurred and no further testing was necessary.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company's long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization. The Company evaluates long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may have been impaired. In evaluating an asset for recoverability, the Company estimates the future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset and eventual disposition. If the expected future undiscounted cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss, equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset, is recognized.

There was no impairment charge during the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

Intangible Assets

The Company's intangible assets consist of acquired customer relationships and trade names of Hilger Crystals, Ltd., acquired know-how of Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc., and provisionally patented technologies within Dynasil Biomedical Corp.

The Company estimates the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income approach, and recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets is less than the carrying value. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company conducted its annual impairment review of indefinite-lived intangible assets and concluded the fair value exceeded the carrying value.

The Company reviews intangible assets with finite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these intangible assets is assessed based on the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value, the intangible assets with finite lives are considered to be impaired. The amount of the impairment loss, if any, is measured as the difference between the carrying amount of these assets and the fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values.

The Company amortizes its intangible assets with definitive lives over their useful lives, which range from 4 to 20 years, based on the time period the Company expects to receive the economic benefit from these assets.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon payment history and the customer's current credit worthiness, as determined by our review of their current credit information. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. While such credit losses have historically been minimal, within our expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any of our significant customers could have a material adverse effect on the collectability of our accounts receivable and our future operating results.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation using fair value. Compensation costs are recognized for stock options granted to employees and directors. Options and warrants granted to employees and non-employees are recorded as an expense over the requisite service period based on the grant date estimated fair value of the grant, determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income tax provision (benefit) in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our current income tax provision (benefit) together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We regularly evaluate our ability to recover the reported amount of our deferred income taxes considering several factors, including our estimate of the likelihood of the Company generating sufficient taxable income in future years during the period over which temporary differences reverse. The Company believes it is more likely than not that these carry-forwards will not be realized and, therefore, a valuation allowance has been applied.

Forward-Looking Statements

The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections and the beliefs and assumptions of our management, including, without limitation, our expectations regarding results of operations, our compliance with the financial covenants under our loan agreements with Middlesex Savings Bank and Massachusetts Capital Resource Company, Xcede obtaining financing from outside investors, the commercialization of our products including our dual mode detectors, our development of new technologies including at Dynasil Biomedical, the adequacy of our current financing sources to fund our current operations, our growth initiatives, our capital expenditures and the strength of our intellectual property portfolio. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “intends,” “may,” “could,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “continue” or similar terms, though not all forward-looking statements contain such words. The actual results of the future events described in such forward-looking statements could differ materially from those stated in such forward-looking statements due to a number of important factors. These factors that could cause actual results to differ from those anticipated or predicted include, without limitation, our ability to develop and commercialize our products, including obtaining regulatory approvals, the size and growth of the potential markets for our products and our ability to serve those markets, the rate and degree of market acceptance of any of our products, general economic conditions, costs and availability of raw materials and management information systems, our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our products, competition, the loss of key management and technical personnel, our ability to obtain timely payment of our invoices to governmental customers, litigation, the effect of governmental regulatory developments, the availability of financing sources, our ability to deleverage our balance sheet, our ability to identify and execute on acquisition opportunities and integrate such acquisitions into our business, and seasonality, as well as the uncertainties set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the risk factors contained in Item 1A, and from time to time in the Company's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to financial measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), this report also contains a measure of our net loss excluding a charge for the final termination and settlement of a subsidiary’s pension plan and the gain on the sale of a product line and our lead paint detector and gamma medical probe businesses. See “—Results of Operations—Net Income.” The Company believes that the inclusion of this non-GAAP financial measure helps investors to gain a meaningful understanding of the Company’s core operating results and enhance comparing such performance with prior periods. Our management uses this non-GAAP measure, in addition to GAAP financial measures, as the basis for measuring our core operating performance and comparing such performance to that of prior periods. The non-GAAP financial measure included in this report is not meant to be considered superior to or a substitute for results of operations prepared in accordance with GAAP.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Dynasil Corporation of America and Subsidiaries

Newton, Massachusetts

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dynasil Corporation of America and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dynasil Corporation of America and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ RSM US LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

December 17, 2015

 DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014 (Continued)

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 1 – Nature of Operations

Nature of Operations

The Company is primarily engaged in the development, marketing and manufacturing of detection, sensing and analysis technology and optical components as well as contract research. The Company’s products and services are used in a broad range of application markets including the homeland security, industrial and medical markets sectors. The products and services are sold throughout the United States and internationally.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dynasil Corporation of America (“Dynasil” or the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Optometrics Corporation (“Optometrics”), Evaporated Metal Films Corporation (“EMF”), Dynasil Products, formerly known as RMD Instruments Corp. (“Dynasil Products”), Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. (“RMD”), Hilger Crystals, Ltd (“Hilger”) and Dynasil Biomedical Corp (“Dynasil Biomedical”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales of products is recognized at the time title and the risks and rewards of ownership pass. Revenue is recognized when the products are shipped per customers’ instructions, the contract has been executed, the contract or sales price is fixed or determinable, delivery of services or products has occurred and the Company’s ability to collect the contract price is considered reasonably assured.

Revenue from research and development activities is derived generally from the following types of contracts: reimbursement of costs plus fees, fixed price or time and material type contracts. Government funded services revenues from cost plus contracts are recognized as costs are incurred on the basis of direct costs plus allowable indirect costs and an allocable portion of the contracts’ fixed fees. Revenue from fixed-type contracts is recognized under the percentage of completion method with estimated costs and profits included in contract revenue as work is performed. Revenues from time and materials contracts are recognized as costs are incurred at amounts represented by agreed billing amounts. Recognition of losses on projects is taken as soon as the loss is reasonably determinable. The Company has an accrual for contract losses in the amount of $110,000 and $117,000 as of September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The majority of the Company’s contract research revenue is derived from the United States government and government related contracts. Such contracts have certain risks which include dependence on future appropriations and administrative allotment of funds and changes in government policies. Costs incurred under United States government contracts are subject to audit. The Company believes that the results of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or its results of operations.

 DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer's current credit worthiness, as determined by a review of their current credit information. The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from our customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses based upon historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that have been identified. While such credit losses have historically been minimal, within expectations and the provisions established, the Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to experience the same credit loss rates as in the past. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any significant customers could have a material adverse effect on the collectability of accounts receivable and future operating results. When all collection efforts have failed and it is deemed probable that a customer account is uncollectible, that balance is written off against the existing allowance.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales. The amounts billed for shipping and included in net revenue were approximately $49,000 and $67,000 for 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Research and Development

The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred. Research and development costs include salaries, employee benefit costs, direct project costs, supplies and other related costs. Substantially all the Contract Research segment’s cost of revenue relates to research contracts performed by RMD which are in turn billed to the contracting party. Amounts of research and development included within cost of revenue for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were $10.6 million and $12.6 million, respectively. Research and development for our other business totaled $0.1 million in both 2015 and 2014.

Costs in Excess of Billings and Unbilled Receivables

Costs in excess of billings and unbilled receivables relate to research and development contracts and consists of actual costs incurred plus fees in excess of billings at provisional contract rates.

Patent Costs

Costs incurred in filing, prosecuting and maintaining patents (principally legal fees) are expensed as incurred and recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. Such costs aggregated approximately $0.5 and $0.4 million for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company’s Xcede joint venture capitalizes patent costs, which equaled $0.1 million in both the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method and includes material, labor and overhead. Inventories consist primarily of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods.

A significant decrease in demand for the Company's products could result in a short-term increase in the cost of inventory purchases and an increase of excess inventory quantities on hand. In addition, as technologies change or new products are developed, product obsolescence could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory quantities on hand. Therefore, although the Company makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of its forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of the inventory and reported operating results. The Company records, as a charge to cost of revenues, any amounts required to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost or at fair market value for acquired assets. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets.

The estimated useful lives of assets for financial reporting purposes are as follows: building and improvements, 8 to 25 years; machinery and equipment, 5 to 20 years; office furniture and fixtures, 5 to 10 years; transportation equipment, 5 years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. When items of property, plant and equipment are sold or retired, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in income.

Goodwill

The Company annually assesses goodwill impairment at the end of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year by applying a fair value test. In the first step of testing for goodwill impairment, the Company estimates the fair value of each reporting unit. The reporting units have been determined as RMD which is the Contract Research reportable segment and Hilger, which is a component of the Optics reportable segment. The Company compares the fair value with the carrying value of the net assets assigned to each reporting unit. If the fair value is less than its carrying value, then the Company performs a second step and determines the fair value of the goodwill. In this second step, the fair value of goodwill is determined by deducting the fair value of a reporting unit’s identifiable assets and liabilities from the fair value of the reporting unit as a whole, as if that reporting unit had just been acquired and the purchase price were being initially allocated. If the fair value of the goodwill is less than its carrying value for a reporting unit, an impairment charge is recorded to earnings.

To determine the fair value of each of the reporting units as a whole, the Company uses a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires significant assumptions and estimates about the future operations of each reporting unit. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis include the determination of appropriate discount rates, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows and growth rates. The cash flows employed in the discounted cash flow analyses are based on financial forecasts developed internally by management. The discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the Company’s risk adjusted discount rate, applicable for each reporting unit. In assessing the reasonableness of the determined fair values of the reporting units, the Company evaluates its results against its current market capitalization.

In addition, the Company evaluates a reporting unit for impairment if events or circumstances change between annual tests indicating a possible impairment. Examples of such events or circumstances include the following:

Intangible Assets

The Company's intangible assets consist of acquired customer relationships, trade names, acquired backlog, know-how and provisionally patented technologies. The Company amortizes its intangible assets with definitive lives over their useful lives, which range from 4 to 20 years, based on the time period the Company expects to receive the economic benefit from these assets.

The Company has a trade name related to its UK subsidiary that has been determined to have an indefinite life and is therefore not subject to amortization and is reviewed at least annually for potential impairment. The fair value of the Company’s trade name is estimated and compared to its carrying value to determine if impairment exists. The Company estimates the fair value of this intangible asset based on an income approach using the relief-from-royalty method. This methodology assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of this asset. This approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future sales, royalty rates in the category of intellectual property, discount rates and other variables. Significant differences between these estimates and actual results could materially affect the Company’s future financial results.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Recovery of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually assesses whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful lives of its long-lived assets (other than goodwill and any indefinite lived assets) or whether the remaining balances of those assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. Long-lived assets include, for example, customer relationships, trade names, backlog, know-how and provisionally patented technologies. Events or changes in circumstances that may indicate that an asset may be impaired include the following:

If an impairment indicator occurs, the Company performs a test of recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset or asset group to its undiscounted expected future cash flows. The Company groups its long-lived assets for this purpose at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets or asset groups. If the carrying values are in excess of undiscounted expected future cash flows, the Company measures any impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset or asset group to its carrying value.

To determine fair value the Company uses discounted cash flow analyses and estimates about the future cash flows of the asset or asset group. This analysis includes a determination of an appropriate discount rate, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows and growth rates. The cash flows employed in the discounted cash flow analyses are typically based on financial forecasts developed internally by management. The discount rate used is commensurate with the risks involved. The Company may also rely on third party valuations and or information available regarding the market value for similar assets.

If the fair value of an asset or asset group is determined to be less than the carrying amount of the asset or asset group, impairment in the amount of the difference is recorded in the period that the impairment occurs. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and projections may vary from the cash flows eventually realized.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs are net of accumulated amortization of $248,000 and $221,000 at September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $28,000 and $82,000, respectively. Future amortization will be $9,000 in fiscal 2016 and $2,000 in fiscal 2017.

Advertising

The Company expenses all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was approximately $96,000 and $91,000, respectively.

Retirement Plans

The Company has retirement savings plans available to substantially all full time employees which are intended to qualify as deferred compensation plans under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and similar laws in the United Kingdom. Pursuant to these plans, employees contribute amounts as required or allowed by the plans or by law. The Company also makes matching contributions in accordance with the terms of the plans.

The Company’s EMF subsidiary previously had a defined benefit pension plan covering hourly employees. The plan provided defined benefits based on years of service and final average salary. As of September 30, 2006, the plan was frozen. On December 1, 2014, the Company terminated and settled its pension liability with each of the remaining participants in the Plan.

Income Taxes

Dynasil Corporation of America and its wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return and various state returns. The Company’s U.K. subsidiary files tax returns in the U.K.

The Company uses the asset and liability approach to account for deferred income taxes. Under this approach, deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. The amount of deferred taxes on these temporary differences is determined using the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, as applicable, based on tax rates, and tax laws, in the respective tax jurisdiction then in effect.

In assessing the ability to realize the net deferred tax assets, management considers various factors including taxable income in carryback years, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies and projections of future taxable income, to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based upon the Company’s current losses and uncertainty of future profits, the Company has determined that the uncertainty regarding the realization of these assets is sufficient to warrant the need for a full valuation allowance against its U.S. net deferred tax assets.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

The Company applies the authoritative provisions related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As required by these provisions, the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more-likely-than-not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being reached upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company has no unrecorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions. Interest and penalty charges, if any, related to uncertain tax positions would be classified as income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income applicable or loss attributable to common shares after preferred dividends paid, if applicable, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per common share adjusts basic earnings per share for the effects of common stock options, common stock warrants, convertible preferred stock and other potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the periods.

For the year ended September 30, 2015, 10,165 shares of potential common stock related to restricted stock and stock options were excluded from the calculation of dilutive shares since there was a loss from operations and the inclusion of potential shares would be anti-dilutive. If the Company had not been in a loss position as of September 30, 2015, 10,165 shares of restricted stock and stock options would have been considered in the denominator used to calculate diluted earnings per common share.

For the year ended September 30, 2014, 14,256 shares of common stock related to restricted stock were included in the denominator used to calculate diluted earnings per common share.

The computations of the weighted shares outstanding for the years ended September 30 are as follows:

Stock Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost is measured using the fair value recognition provisions of the FASB authoritative guidance, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the requisite service period of the award.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Foreign Currency Translation

The operations of Hilger, the Company’s foreign subsidiary, use their local currency as its functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations, denominated in their local currency, Great Britain Pounds (GBP), are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. Adjustments resulting from translating foreign functional currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in the foreign currency translation adjustment, a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses generated by transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in the accompanying statement of operations in the period in which they occur.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) represents cumulative translation adjustments related to Hilger, the Company’s foreign subsidiary and included cumulative adjustments pertaining to the Company’s Defined Benefit Pension Plan in 2014. The Company presents comprehensive income and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Financial Instruments

The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts for fixed rate long-term debt and variable rate long term debt approximate fair value because the underlying instruments are primarily at current market rates available to the Company for similar borrowings.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to certain customers. Management performs initial and ongoing credit evaluations of their customers and generally does not require collateral.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains allowances for potential credit losses and has not experienced any significant losses related to the collection of its accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, approximately $921,000 and $665,000 or 26% and 18% of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from foreign sales.

The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents at various financial institutions in New Jersey, Massachusetts and New York. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company's uninsured bank balances totaled approximately $600,000 and $3,000,000. The Company has not experienced any significant losses on its cash and cash equivalents.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360) Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. In April 2014, the Financial Statement Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2014-08, which provides new guidance on reporting discontinued operations and disclosures of disposals. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations will be presented as discontinued operations. The new guidance also requires disclosure of the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of the company that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 and it did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Section A—Summary and Amendments That Create Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40). In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, which clarifies the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. Under the new guidance, a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after completion of the service period should be treated as a performance condition under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718 and, as a result, should not be included in the estimation of the grant-date fair value of the award. An entity should recognize compensation cost for the award when it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. In the event that an entity determines that it is probable that a performance target will be achieved before the end of the service period, the compensation cost of the award should be recognized prospectively over the remaining service period. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Preparation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, which states that under GAAP, continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting. Even when an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this ASU should be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2017, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company will evaluate the going concern considerations in this ASU; however, management does not currently believe that the Company will meet the conditions that would subject its financial statements to additional disclosure.

Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, which eliminates the concept of extraordinary items in an entity’s income statement. Extraordinary classification outside of income from continuing operations was previously considered only when evidence clearly supported its classification as an extraordinary item. Extraordinary items were events and transactions that were distinguished by their unusual nature and by the infrequency of their occurrence. The ASU eliminates the need to separately classify, present and disclose extraordinary events. The disclosure of events or transactions that are unusual or infrequent in nature will be included in other guidance. This new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. This new disclosure guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2017. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Inventory (Topic 330), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, which requires that an entity should measure inventory within the scope of this ASU at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Substantial and unusual losses that result from subsequent measurement of inventory should be disclosed in the financial statements. This new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2018. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Business Combinations (Topic 805), Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, which requires that an acquirer recognize adjustment to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The acquirer needs to record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciations, amortization or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. In addition, an entity is required to present, separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes, the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. This new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2017. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company generally considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Note 3 – Acquisitions and Divestitures

On June 26, 2014, Dynasil and its wholly owned subsidiary Evaporated Metal Films Corp., a New York corporation (“EMF”) completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of DichroTec Thin Films, LLC (“DichroTec”), a New York limited liability company and manufacturer of optical thin film coatings.

Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “APA”) by and among Dynasil, EMF, DichroTec and Syncrolite, LLC, the former owner of DichroTec, EMF acquired substantially all of the assets of DichroTec for approximately $500,000 in cash and 700,000 shares of Dynasil Common Stock for a total purchase price of approximately $1.7 million. The purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased which consist of $1.6 million of machinery and equipment and $0.1 million of inventory. The APA contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification provisions for these types of transactions. DichroTec reported unaudited revenue of approximately $1.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 3 – Acquisitions and Divestitures (continued)

On December 23, 2013, the Company sold its gamma medical probe business to Dilon Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Dilon”), for $3.5 million, the assumption of certain liabilities of the Company, and a possible contingent payment. The Agreement also provided for $250,000 of the proceeds to be deposited in escrow for a year, which amount is included in accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in 2014. The Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification provisions.

On November 7, 2013, the Company sold its lead paint detector business to Protec Instrument Corporation (“Protec”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Laboratoires Protec S.A., a French corporation and former European distributor of the Company’s lead paint detector products. The sales price totaled approximately $1.2 million, including the assumption of certain liabilities by Protec. The transaction also resulted in payment to the Company of approximately $500,000 in satisfaction of outstanding accounts receivable.

In connection with the sales of the businesses discussed above, the Company recorded a gain of $1.3 million which is included in Income from Operations in 2014. The businesses sold constituted substantially all of Instruments segment but did not constitute a component of the business, and therefore did not qualify to be reported as discontinued operations. The Company used $4.0 million of the proceeds from the sales to reduce its bank indebtedness.

Note 4 – Inventories

Inventories, net of reserves, at September 30, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following:

Note 5 - Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment at September 30, 2015 and 2014 consist of the following:

Depreciation expense for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $1,026,000 and $948,000.

 DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 6 – Intangible Assets

Intangible assets at September 30, 2015 and 2014 consist of the following:

Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was $170,000 and $175,000, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years is as follows:

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 7 – Goodwill

The changes to goodwill during the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are summarized as follows:

With respect to the Company's annual goodwill impairment testing performed during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, step one of the testing determined the estimated fair value of RMD (included in the Contract Research segment) and Hilger (included in the Optics segment) reporting units exceeded their carrying value by more than 20%. Accordingly, the Company concluded that no impairment had occurred and no further testing was necessary.

The step one test for the RMD reporting unit and the resulting calculation of the indicated fair value was performed as described above based on certain specific assumptions. The Company relied on a weighted average cost of capital of approximately 13% for this reporting unit which takes into consideration certain industry and specific premiums. The Company utilized a long term growth rate of approximately 1.5% for this reporting unit which considers industry research and management’s expectations as to the prospects for long term growth in this industry.  

The step one test for the Hilger reporting unit and the resulting calculation of the indicated fair value was performed as described above based on certain specific assumptions. The Company relied on a weighted average cost of capital of 16% for this reporting unit which takes into consideration certain industry and specific premiums. The Company utilized a long term growth rate of approximately 3% for this reporting unit which considers industry research and management’s expectations as to the prospects for long term growth in this industry. 

Determining the fair value using a discounted cash flow method requires significant estimates and assumptions, including market conditions, discount rates, and long-term projections of cash flows. The Company’s estimates are based upon historical experience, current market trends, projected future volumes and other information. The Company believes that the estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation methodology are reasonable; however, different estimates and assumptions could result in a different estimate of fair value. In estimating future cash flows, the Company relies on internally generated projections for a defined time period for revenue and operating profits, including capital expenditures, changes in net working capital, and adjustments for non-cash items to arrive at the free cash flow available to invested capital. A terminal value utilizing a constant growth rate of cash flows is used to calculate a terminal value after the explicit projection period. The future projected cash flows for the discrete projection period and the terminal value are discounted at a risk adjusted discount rate to determine the fair value of the reporting unit.

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurement

The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurement (continued)

Under the FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are to be categorized into one of the three hierarchy levels based on the transparency of the inputs used in the valuation.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

The FASB fair value guidance also applies to certain assets that indirectly impact the consolidated financial statements, including pension plan assets. While the Company does not have direct control over these assets, the Company is indirectly impacted by subsequent fair value adjustments to these assets and the actual return on these assets not only affects the net periodic benefit cost but also the amount included in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company uses the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of assets held in the pension plan. On December 1, 2014, the Company terminated and settled its pension liability and, consequently, no longer has any pension plan assets.

The following table presents the pension plan assets financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30, 2014 in accordance with the fair value hierarchy:

Note 9 – Debt

As of September 30, 2015, the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants included in its outstanding indebtedness.

Senior Debt

On May 1, 2014, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement (the “Bank Loan Agreement”) and line of credit note (the “Note”) with Middlesex dated May 1, 2014 pursuant to which it agreed to provide up to $4 million, subject to the availability restrictions described below, under a revolving line of credit loan to the Company for general corporate purposes. The Bank Loan Agreement provides that the loan expires on May 1, 2017, at which time all outstanding principal and unpaid interest shall become due and payable.

The Bank Loan Agreement and the Note are secured by (i) a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s personal property and (ii) sixty-five percent (65%) of Dynasil’s equity interests in its UK subsidiary, Hilger Crystals, Ltd. Under the Note, the borrowing base is determined monthly based on eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable and eligible inventory. The interest rate under the Note is equal the Prime Rate, but in no event less than 3.25%.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 9 – Debt (continued)

Senior Debt (continued)

The Bank Loan Agreement also contains other terms, conditions and provisions that are customary for commercial lending transactions of this sort. The Bank Loan Agreement requires Dynasil, at the close of each fiscal quarter, to maintain a Debt Service Coverage ratio, as defined, of at least 1.20 to 1.00 on a trailing four quarter basis.

The Bank Loan Agreement provides for events of default customary for credit facilities of this type, including but not limited to non-payment, defaults on other debt, misrepresentation, breach of covenants, representations and warranties, insolvency and bankruptcy, change of management, as defined and the occurrence of a material adverse change, as defined. As a result of the material adverse change clause, the line of credit is classified as a current liability.

The Bank Loan Agreement was amended on September 29, 2015 to permit the Company to repay up to $3 million of the subordinated debt owed Massachusetts Capital Resources Company (“MCRC”) and also provides for the Company, if it meets certain conditions, to convert up to $2 million of the advances under the line of credit to a fixed rate note with the principal amortizing monthly over a five year term.

Subordinated Debt

On July 31, 2012, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Massachusetts Capital Resource Company (“MCRC”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company issued and sold to MCRC a $3,000,000 subordinated note (the “Subordinated Note”) for a purchase price of $3,000,000.

The Subordinated Note initially matured on July 31, 2017, unless accelerated pursuant to an event of default. The Subordinated Note provided for interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, with interest to be payable monthly on the last day of each calendar month and principal payments of $130,000 beginning on September 30, 2015, and on the last day of each calendar month thereafter through and including July 31, 2017.

Effective October 1, 2015, in connection with a prepayment of $2 million of the Subordinated Note, MCRC agreed to adjust the interest rate to 6% and to amend the principal repayment terms such that beginning on September 30, 2016, the Company will redeem monthly, without premium, $43,478 in principal amount of Subordinated Note together with all accrued and unpaid interest then due on the amount redeemed.

Other Debt

The Company’s Optometrics Corporation subsidiary entered into notes payable with two government entities for up to $500,000 of financing in connection with the purchase of certain equipment. The notes bear interest at 5% to 5.25% and are repayable in monthly installments over a five year period.

The Company’s Xcede joint venture raised $2.0 million through the issuance of convertible notes which bear interest at 5%, due on demand after June 30, 2016. The notes are convertible into equity of Xcede at a 20% discount to the first equity financing of Xcede of at least $3.0 million.

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 9 – Debt (continued)

Debt at September 30, 2015 and 2014 is summarized as follows:

The aggregate maturities of debt based on the payment terms of the agreement are as follows:

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 10 – Income Taxes

Income (loss) before the provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:

The provision (credit) for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements consists of the following:

A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the Company's effective tax rate is as follows:

DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 and 2014

Note 10 – Income Taxes (continued)

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following at September 30, 2015:

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following at September 30, 2014: