DYNATRONICS CORP - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission File Number: 0-12697
Dynatronics Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Utah
|
87-0398434
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
7030 Park Centre Drive, Cottonwood Heights, UT 84121
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
(801) 568-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes þ No
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, no par value, as of November 12, 2013 is 2,518,904. In December 2012, the registrant completed a 1-for-5 reverse split of its common stock. All common stock share and per share information in the accompanying report has been adjusted to reflect retrospective application of the reverse stock split, except for par value per share and the number of authorized shares, which were not affected by the reverse stock split.
DYNATRONICS CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
|
||
PART I.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
1
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013
|
1
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
|
2
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
|
3
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
4 | |
|
||
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
7 |
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
13
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
13
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
14
|
DYNATRONICS CORPORATION
|
||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
September 30,
2013
|
June 30,
2013
|
||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 220,660 | 302,050 | |||||
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $269,071 as of September 30, 2013 and $247,708 as of June 30, 2013
|
3,256,432 | 3,246,712 | ||||||
Other receivables
|
23,310 | 27,197 | ||||||
Inventories, net
|
6,255,317 | 6,407,553 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other
|
592,605 | 506,836 | ||||||
Current portion of deferred income tax assets
|
400,100 | 389,101 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
10,748,424 | 10,879,449 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
3,231,493 | 3,324,947 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net
|
268,918 | 280,078 | ||||||
Other assets
|
404,154 | 422,672 | ||||||
Deferred income tax assets, net of current portion
|
247,167 | 197,441 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 14,900,156 | 15,104,587 | |||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt
|
$ | 321,501 | 322,573 | |||||
Line of credit
|
3,616,601 | 3,496,390 | ||||||
Warranty reserve
|
166,696 | 178,148 | ||||||
Accounts payable
|
2,453,441 | 2,751,894 | ||||||
Accrued expenses
|
388,855 | 347,221 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and benefits expense
|
325,318 | 216,266 | ||||||
Income tax payable
|
29,169 | 21,369 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
7,301,581 | 7,333,861 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
1,479,490 | 1,561,776 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
8,781,071 | 8,895,637 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||
Common stock, no par value: Authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 2,518,904 shares as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013
|
7,096,860 | 7,078,941 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(977,775 | ) | (869,991 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity
|
6,119,085 | 6,208,950 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 14,900,156 | 15,104,587 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
DYNATRONICS CORPORATION
|
||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30
|
||||||||
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 7,055,428 | 7,206,025 | |||||
Cost of sales
|
4,474,359 | 4,495,177 | ||||||
Gross profit
|
2,581,069 | 2,710,848 | ||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
2,379,369 | 2,459,104 | ||||||
Research and development expenses
|
314,823 | 266,268 | ||||||
Operating loss
|
(113,123 | ) | (14,524 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense):
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
3 | 329 | ||||||
Interest expense
|
(59,913 | ) | (66,767 | ) | ||||
Other income, net
|
4,524 | 7,353 | ||||||
Net other income (expense)
|
(55,386 | ) | (59,085 | ) | ||||
Loss before income taxes
|
(168,509 | ) | (73,609 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit
|
60,725 | 22,464 | ||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (107,784 | ) | (51,145 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
|
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
2,518,904 | 2,537,730 | ||||||
Diluted
|
2,518,904 | 2,537,730 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
DYNATRONICS CORPORATION
|
||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30
|
||||||||
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (107,784 | ) | (51,145 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
|
106,422 | 109,167 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible and other assets
|
35,384 | 11,160 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
17,919 | 24,812 | ||||||
Change in deferred income tax assets
|
(60,725 | ) | (22,464 | ) | ||||
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable
|
24,000 | 45,000 | ||||||
Provision for inventory obsolescence
|
30,000 | 30,000 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
(29,832 | ) | (80,206 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
122,236 | (21,994 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(83,052 | ) | (8,344 | ) | ||||
Prepaid income taxes
|
20,248 | 27,771 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(171,668 | ) | (109,650 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
(96,852 | ) | (45,893 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(24,700 | ) | (25,602 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(24,700 | ) | (25,602 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
(80,049 | ) | (96,866 | ) | ||||
Net change in line of credit
|
120,211 | 175,737 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
40,162 | 78,871 | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(81,390 | ) | 7,376 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
|
302,050 | 278,263 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
|
$ | 220,660 | 285,639 | |||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 60,459 | 66,313 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DYNATRONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, and the condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were prepared by Dynatronics Corporation (the “Company”) without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments, which consist only of normal recurring adjustments, to the financial statements have been made to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014. The Company previously filed with the SEC an annual report on Form 10-K which included audited financial statements for each of the two years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. It is suggested that the financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K.
On December 19, 2012, the Company completed a 1-for-5 reverse split of its common stock. All common stock share and per share information in the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto have been adjusted to reflect retrospective application of the reverse stock split, except for par value per share and the number of authorized shares, which were not affected by the reverse stock split.
NOTE 2. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss) per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and, when appropriate, dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Stock options are considered to be common stock equivalents. The computation of diluted net income (loss) per common share does not assume exercise or conversion of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect.
Basic net income (loss) per common share is the amount of net income (loss) for the period available to each weighted-average share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is the amount of net income (loss) for the period available to each weighted-average share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period and to each common stock equivalent outstanding during the period, unless inclusion of common stock equivalents would have an anti-dilutive effect.
The reconciliations between the basic and diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30
|
||||||||
2013
|
2012
|
|||||||
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period
|
2,518,904 | 2,537,730 | ||||||
Weighted-average number of dilutive common stock options outstanding during the period
|
- | - | ||||||
Diluted weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period
|
2,518,904 | 2,537,730 |
Outstanding options for common shares not included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per common share, because they were anti-dilutive, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled 155,726 and 168,596.
4
NOTE 3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
|
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company recognized $17,919 and $24,812 in stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These expenses were recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Stock Options. The Company maintains a 2005 equity incentive plan for the benefit of employees. Incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted common stock, stock appreciation rights, and other stock-based awards may be granted under the plan. Awards granted under the plan may be performance-based. As of September 30, 2013, there were 112,296 shares of common stock authorized and reserved for issuance, but not granted under the terms of the 2005 equity incentive plan, as amended.
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity during the three-month period ended September 30, 2013.
Number of
Options
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period
|
163,868 | $ | 6.51 | |||||
Granted
|
3,598 | 2.42 | ||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | ||||||
Cancelled
|
(6,707 | ) | 5.99 | |||||
Outstanding at end of period
|
160,759 | 6.44 | ||||||
Exercisable at end of period
|
139,548 | 7.12 |
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted under the Company’s stock option plan. The weighted-average fair values of stock options granted under the plan for the three months ended September 30, 2013 were based on the following assumptions at the date of grant as follows:
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
|
||||
2013
|
||||
Expected dividend yield
|
0 | % | ||
Expected stock price volatility
|
73.23 | % | ||
Risk-free interest rate
|
2.53 | % | ||
Expected life of options
|
10 years
|
|||
Weighted-average grant date fair value
|
$ | 1.89 |
Expected option lives and volatilities are based on historical data of the Company. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Bills rate on the grant date for constant maturities that correspond with the option life. Historically, the Company has not declared dividends and there are no future plans to do so.
As of September 30, 2013, there was $436,307 of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to grants under the stock option plan that is expected to be expensed over a weighted-average period of four to ten years. There was $3,981 of intrinsic value for options outstanding as of September 30, 2013.
NOTE 4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, comprehensive loss was equal to the net loss as presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
5
NOTE 5. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following:
September 30,
2013
|
June 30,
2013
|
|||||||
Raw materials
|
$ | 2,709,310 | 2,732,363 | |||||
Finished goods
|
3,905,443 | 4,002,709 | ||||||
Inventory obsolescence reserve
|
(359,436 | ) | (327,519 | ) | ||||
$ | 6,255,317 | 6,407,553 |
NOTE 6. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company currently leases office and warehouse space in Detroit, Michigan and Hopkins, Minnesota from two shareholders and former independent distributors on an annual basis under operating lease arrangements. During the first six months of the prior fiscal year the Company also leased office and warehouse space in Pleasanton, California from a shareholder and former independent distributor. In December, 2012, the Company moved its Pleasanton operation to a new, larger location in Livermore, California and entered into a lease agreement with an unaffiliated third party. Management believes the lease agreements are on an arms-length basis and the terms are equal to or more favorable than would be available to third parties. The expense associated with these related-party transactions totaled $17,250 and $37,800 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
NOTE 7. LINE OF CREDIT
Interest on the line of credit is based on the 90-day LIBOR rate (.25% as of September 30, 2013) plus 3.5%. The line of credit is collateralized by accounts receivable and inventories. Borrowing limitations are based on approximately 45% of eligible inventory and up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable, up to a maximum credit facility of $7,000,000. Interest payments on the line are due monthly. As of September 30, 2013, the borrowing base was approximately $4,833,000 resulting in approximately $1,216,000 of available credit on the line. The line of credit agreement includes covenants requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. As of September 30, 2013, the Company was not in compliance with one of the bank loan covenants. The line of credit is renewable on December 15, 2013. However, if the line of credit is not extended, the Company will need to find additional sources of financing. Failure to obtain additional financing would have a material adverse effect on our business operations. All borrowings under the line of credit are presented as current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
NOTE 8. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This update indicates that an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset except in circumstances where a net operating loss carryforward or tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction. This update is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2013 for public companies. The Company doesn’t expect this update to have a significant impact on its financials. However, the Company will ensure the presentation of any unrecognized tax benefit is presented in accordance with the update.
In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) – Liquidation Basis of Accounting. This update requires an entity to use the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is considered imminent if the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces. The Update also indicates that asset should be measured and presented at the expected amount of cash proceeds to be received upon liquidation. The entity should also present any assets not previously recognized but expects to sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (i.e. trademarks, etc.). This update is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company doesn’t expect this update to impact its financials since it does not expect liquidation to be imminent in the near future.
6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Dynatronics Corporation (“Company,” “Dynatronics,” “we”) design, manufacture, distribute, market and sell physical medicine and aesthetic products. We offer a broad line of medical equipment including therapy devices, medical supplies and soft goods, treatment tables and rehabilitation equipment. Our line of aesthetic products includes aesthetic massage and microdermabrasion devices, as well as skin care products. Our products are sold to and used primarily by physical therapists, chiropractors, sports medicine practitioners, podiatrists, plastic surgeons, dermatologists and aestheticians. We operate on a fiscal year ending June 30. For example, reference to fiscal year 2014 refers to the year ending June 30, 2014.
Recent Developments
In January 2013, all medical device manufacturers, including the Company, became subject to the medical device tax (“MDT”) provisions of the Affordable Care Act. The MDT requires that medical device manufacturers and importers pay a 2.3% excise tax on sales of all qualified medical devices. Some exemptions in the law allow us to exclude a large portion of sales from being subject to the MDT. For instance, products that are sold internationally are not subject to the MDT. Products that are generally sold at retail are not subject to the MDT. Products manufactured by others and distributed by Dynatronics are not taxable to us under the MDT (although many of these manufacturers are raising prices to their customers to cover their cost of the MDT). Given these exemptions, we believe that approximately 20-30% of our sales are subject to the MDT. During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we paid $39,532 in MDT.
In April 2013, we introduced our newly expanded product catalog with over 1,000 additional new products. In total, the catalog now lists over 13,000 products. The expanded lines include additional athletic training equipment, treatment tables, rehab equipment, hand therapy products, exercise products, clinic furniture, products for bariatric patients and point of sale items which practitioners can sell to their patients. The new catalog contains over 600 pages of medical devices and supplies, treatment tables, rehab equipment, hot and cold therapy products, exercise equipment, clinical accessories, cardio equipment, diagnostic and evaluation products, orthopedic supports, hydrotherapy products, analgesics, nutritional supplements, lymphedema and wound care products, as well as homecare and aides to daily living items. A new e-catalog is also available on our website at www.dynatronics.com. Reference to our website is not intended to incorporate any of the information contained on the site into this report.
In June 2013, we introduced our new Dynatron® 25 Series electrotherapy/ultrasound line of combination therapy devices to the market. This new line consists of four separate devices: the Dynatron 925, Dynatron 825, Dynatron 625 and Dynatron 525. These four units provide seven different types of electrotherapy treatments and three frequencies of ultrasound, including our proprietary three-frequency ultrasound transducers. They are capable of delivering between three and five separate treatments simultaneously, depending on the model. The ability to provide multiple treatments simultaneously is proving to be helpful in busy clinics and training rooms, and for patients needing treatment of multiple areas of the body. This new product line was specially designed to be sold through our expanding channel of general line distributors.
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013, should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Part I, Item 1 of this report, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, which includes audited financial statements for the year then ended. Results of operations for the first fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be achieved for the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2014.
Net Sales
|
Net sales decreased $150,597 or approximately 2.1% to $7,055,428 for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to net sales of $7,206,025 for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Lower sales of distributed medical products and supplies, including exercise products, nutritional supplements and taping products, accounted for the decrease in sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to the prior year period. The continued general economic weakness in our primary markets, combined with uncertainties surrounding the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, have dampened demand and contributed to lower sales.
To offset these challenges, management has undertaken a plan to expand our distribution channels by adding several new dealers and sales representatives and introduce a major new product in the quarter ending December 31, 2013. This new product is the Dynatron Thermostim probe, and we expect it will be one of the most innovative and attractive products in our history. The ThermoStim probe delivers thermal therapy (hot and cold) and/or electrotherapy in a targeted, attended treatment. The hand-held probe is an accessory to the Dynatron SolarisPlus family of products. It utilizes a thermoelectric chip to generate the thermal therapy and can be powered by any one of four Dynatron SolarisPlus units. We expect demand for this innovative probe to be strong. And since the probe is operated from the control console of the SolarisPlus units, we expect demand for SolarisPlus units to rise commensurate with the demand for the ThermoStim probe. We anticipate that the probe will be the catalyst to not only boost sales, but also attract new distributors to our products.
7
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased approximately $129,779 or about 4.8% to $2,581,069, or 36.6% of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to $2,710,848, or 37.6% of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Lower sales generated during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, together with a shift in product mix, contributed to the reduction in gross profit compared to the prior year period. In addition, a reduction in revenue from the phasing out of our Stream software service contributed to the lower gross profit generated in the reporting quarter.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses decreased $79,735 to $2,379,369, or 33.7% of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, from $2,459,104, or 34.1% of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The following factors impacted SG&A expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012:
·
|
$54,090 of lower general expenses, primarily lower legal and professional fees;
|
·
|
$19,478 of lower operating and building rent expense;
|
·
|
$6,167 of lower selling expenses, primarily associated with lower commission expense.
|
Research and Development Expenses
|
Research and development (“R&D”) expenses increased $48,555 to $314,823, or 4.5% of sales, in the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to $266,268, or 3.7% of sales in the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The higher R&D expense in the current period is primarily the result of development costs associated with the new Thermostim probe. Over the past year, we have introduced more new products than any year in our history. The new product introductions include the SolarisPlus line of electrotherapy/ultrasound/phototherapy units, the Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 motorized treatment tables, and the 25 Series line of electrotherapy and ultrasound products. We believe that developing new products is a key element in our growth strategy and critical to moving purchasing inertia in a positive direction. R&D costs are expensed as incurred.
Loss Before Income Tax Benefit
Pre-tax loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, was $168,509, compared to $73,609 for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Lower sales and gross profits, together with higher R&D expenses were the primary factors in the increased pre-tax loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. With the introduction of the new Thermostim probe in the quarter ending December 31, 2013, management expects to see improvement in sales as well as reduction in R&D expenses resulting in higher profits during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2014.
Income Tax Benefit
Income tax benefit was $60,725 for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to $22,464 for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. Due to tax benefits associated with R&D tax credits and other credits, the effective tax benefit rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 was 36.0% compared to 30.5% for the same quarter of the prior year. The difference in the effective tax rate for the three-month period ended September 30, 2013 compared to the prior year period is attributable to a difference in R&D tax credits as well as certain permanent book to tax differences.
Net Loss
Net loss was $107,784 ($.04 per share) for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, compared to $51,145 ($.02 per share) for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The increase in net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 is due to lower sales and gross profits generated during the quarter, together with higher R&D expenses associated with the development of our new products.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed operations through available cash reserves and borrowings under a line of credit with a bank. Working capital decreased $109,744 to $3,435,844 as of September 30, 2013, inclusive of the current portion of long-term obligations and credit facilities, compared to working capital of $3,545,588 as of June 30, 2013. The current ratio was 1.5 to 1 as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013. Current assets were 72% of total assets as of both September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013.
8
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Our cash and cash equivalents position as of September 30, 2013, was $220,660, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $302,050 as of June 30, 2013. Our cash position varies from quarter to quarter, but typically stays within a range of $150,000 to $400,000. We expect that cash flows from operating activities, together with amounts available through an existing line-of-credit facility, will be sufficient to cover operating needs in the ordinary course of business for at least the next twelve months. If we experience an adverse operating environment, or unusual capital expenditure requirements, additional financing may be required. No assurance can be given that additional financing, if required, would be available on terms favorable to us, or at all.
Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, increased $9,720, or 0.3%, to $3,256,432 as of September 30, 2013, compared to $3,246,712 as of June 30, 2013. Trade accounts receivable represent amounts due from our customers including medical practitioners, clinics, hospitals, colleges and universities and sports teams as well as dealers and distributors that purchase our products for redistribution. We believe that our estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate based on our historical knowledge and relationship with these customers. Accounts receivable are generally collected within 30 days of the agreed terms.
Inventories
|
Inventories, net of reserves, decreased $152,236, or 2.4%, to $6,255,317 as of September 30, 2013, compared to $6,407,553 as of June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, we increased our inventory of parts in conjunction with the introduction of the 25 Series product line. During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we were able to reduce inventory levels to more historic levels. Inventory levels also fluctuate based on the timing of large inventory purchases from overseas suppliers.
Accounts Payable
Accounts payable decreased $298,453, or 10.8%, to $2,453,441 as of September 30, 2013, from $2,751,894 as of June 30, 2013. The decrease in accounts payable is a result of efforts to reduce our outstanding payables, as well as decreased inventory levels, the timing of our weekly payments to suppliers and the timing of purchases of product components. Accounts payable are generally not aged beyond the terms of our suppliers. We take advantage of available early payment discounts when offered by our vendors.
Line of Credit
The outstanding balance on our line of credit increased $120,211 to $3,616,601 as of September 30, 2013, compared to $3,496,390 as of June 30, 2013. The main contributor to the increase in the line of credit was the reduction in accounts payable described above. Interest on the line of credit is based on the 90-day LIBOR rate (0.25% as of September 30, 2013) plus 3.5%. The line of credit is collateralized by accounts receivable and inventories. Borrowing limitations are based on approximately 45% of eligible inventory and up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable, up to a maximum credit facility of $7,000,000. Interest payments on the line are due monthly. As of September 30, 2013, the borrowing base was approximately $4,833,000 resulting in approximately $1,216,000 of available credit on the line. The line of credit is renewable on December 15, 2013 and includes covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios. As of September 30, 2013, we were not in compliance with one of the loan covenants. If the line of credit is not extended, we will need to find additional sources of financing. Failure to obtain additional financing would have a material adverse effect on our business operations. All borrowings under the line of credit are presented as current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
We believe that amounts available under the line of credit as well as cash generated from operating activities will continue to be sufficient to meet our operating requirements.
Debt
Long-term debt, excluding current installments decreased $82,286 to $1,479,490 as of September 30, 2013, compared to $1,561,776 as of June 30, 2013. Long-term debt is comprised primarily of the mortgage loans on our office and manufacturing facilities in Utah and Tennessee. The principal balance on the mortgage loans is approximately $1,697,699, of which $1,431,939 is classified as long-term debt, with monthly principal and interest payments of $30,263. Our mortgage loans mature in 2017 and 2021.
9
Inflation
Our revenues and net income have not been unusually affected by inflation or price increases for raw materials and parts from vendors.
Stock Repurchase Plans
Our Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase plan that has been ongoing since 2003. Purchases of shares may be made from time-to-time, in the open market, through block trades or otherwise, and decisions to repurchase shares under this plan are based among other criteria upon market conditions, the level of our cash balances, general business opportunities, and other factors. Our Board of Directors periodically approves the dollar amounts for share repurchases under the plan. As of September 30, 2013, $448,450 remained available under the plan for purchases. There is no expiration date for the plan. No purchases were made under this plan during the three months ended September 30, 2013.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our consolidated condensed financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses. Management bases estimates on historical experience and other assumptions it believes to be reasonable given the circumstances and evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies involve a high degree of judgment and complexity. The following summary sets forth information regarding significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Inventory Reserves
The nature of our business requires that we maintain sufficient inventory on hand at all times to meet the requirements of our customers. We record finished goods inventory at the lower of standard cost, which approximates actual costs (first-in, first-out) or market. Raw materials are recorded at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventory valuation reserves are maintained for the estimated impairment of the inventory. Impairment may be a result of slow-moving or excess inventory, product obsolescence or changes in the valuation of the inventory. In determining the adequacy of reserves, we analyze the following, among other things:
·
|
Current inventory quantities on hand;
|
·
|
Product acceptance in the marketplace;
|
·
|
Customer demand;
|
·
|
Historical sales;
|
·
|
Forecast sales;
|
·
|
Product obsolescence;
|
·
|
Technological innovations; and
|
·
|
Character of the inventory as a distributed item, finished manufactured item or raw material.
|
Any modifications to estimates of inventory valuation reserves are reflected in cost of goods sold within the statements of operations during the period in which such modifications are determined necessary by management. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, our inventory valuation reserve balance, which established a new cost basis, was $359,437 and $327,519, respectively, and our inventory balance was $6,255,317 and $6,407,553, net of reserves, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Our sales force and distributors sell our products to end users, including physical therapists, professional trainers, athletic trainers, chiropractors, medical doctors and aestheticians. Sales revenues are recorded when products are shipped under an agreement with a customer, risk of loss and title have passed to the customer, and collection of any resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Amounts billed for shipping and handling of products are recorded as sales revenue. Costs for shipping and handling of products to customers are recorded as cost of sales.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We must make estimates of the collectability of accounts receivable. In doing so, we analyze historical bad debt trends, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Our accounts receivable balance was $3,256,432 and $3,246,712, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $269,071 and $247,708, as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively.
10
Deferred Income Tax Assets
In assessing the deferred income tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the years in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods which the deferred income tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefits of these deductible differences.
Business Plan and Outlook
During the past three years, we have focused much of our resources and energy on developing new and innovative products. The scope of that R&D effort has been more significant than at any time in our history. As a result, we have introduced several important new products over the past year.
In August 2012, we introduced to the market our new Dynatron SolarisPlus line of electrotherapy/ultrasound/ phototherapy units. This new product line consists of four new units: the Dynatron SolarisPlus 709, 708, 706, and 705. These attractive new units provide our most advanced technology in combination therapy devices by adding phototherapy capabilities to enhanced electrotherapy and ultrasound combination devices. The Dynatron SolarisPlus line of products features a Tri-Wave phototherapy probe and a Tri-Wave phototherapy pad. Tri-wave phototherapy features infrared, red and blue wavelength light. The new Dynatron Solaris Tri-Wave phototherapy pad is capable of treating large areas of the body via unattended infrared, red and blue wavelength phototherapy. The Tri-Wave phototherapy probe allows the practitioner to treat specific, targeted areas of the body in an attended treatment. As part of the SolarisPlus product line, we also introduced a new display cart specifically designed for these units. The SolarisPlus line has become quite popular for its power and versatility. These units are capable of simultaneously powering five electrotherapy channels, ultrasound therapy, a phototherapy probe and phototherapy pad. No other device on the market offers such powerful simultaneous combination therapies.
In December 2012, we introduced a new line of motorized treatment tables. The Ultra 2 and Ultra 3 are the first two of possibly several other future treatment tables manufactured for us by Enraf-Nonius, a well-established manufacturer of physical therapy products in Europe. These tables offer features popular to the practitioner such as full-length foot bars that elevate and lower the table height together with a unique wheel raising system that lifts the table allowing an easy change between mobility and stability. Enraf tables are known for their high quality standards and are competitively priced for the US market.
In April 2013, we began shipping the newly updated version of our product catalog to customers. This new catalog not only includes our new proprietary products previously discussed, but also expands our offering of non-proprietary products by hundreds of items in order to better service the broader needs of our customers. It also provides an excellent new sales tool for all of our sales representatives in the field and the foundation for expanding our e-commerce platform. The new catalog includes an online electronic version of the catalog that is incorporated into our e-commerce website. The new catalog has been praised for its clarity and ease of use.
In June 2013, we began shipping our new Dynatron® 25 Series electrotherapy/ultrasound line of combination therapy devices. This new line consists of four separate devices: the Dynatron 925, Dynatron 825, Dynatron 625 and Dynatron 525. These four units provide seven different types of electrotherapy treatments and three frequencies of ultrasound, including our proprietary three-frequency ultrasound transducers. They are capable of delivering between three and five separate treatments simultaneously, depending on the model. This new product line was specially designed to be sold through our expanding channel of general line distributors.
In the quarter ending December 31, 2013, we anticipate introducing the ThermoStim probe, one of the most innovative and revolutionary products in our history. The ThermoStim probe is a soft-tissue mobilization tool that also allows a practitioner to deliver heat or cold therapy in combination with electrical stimulation. An optional accessory to our new SolarisPlus family of products, this unique tool facilitates the delivery of three different therapies in one treatment, significantly reducing the time typically required to administer separate treatments. A thermoelectric chip creates the thermal therapy delivered by the Thermostim probe. We expect that demand for the probe will also generate significant demand for the new SolarisPlus units which serve as the control console for the probe. We anticipate that the probe will be the catalyst to boost sales and attract new distributors in fiscal year 2014.
Having released most of our planned new products, we expect R&D costs to cycle back during the last half of fiscal year 2014 to a lower level. Management is confident the investments made in R&D over the last 30 months will yield long-term benefits and are important to assuring that we maintain our reputation in the industry for being an innovator and leader in product development.
11
Over the past few years, consolidations in our market have changed the landscape of our industry’s distribution channels. At the present time, we believe that there remain only two companies with a national direct sales force selling proprietary and distributed products: Dynatronics and Patterson Medical. All other distribution in our market is directed through catalog companies with a limited direct sales force, or through independent local dealers that have limited geographical reach. In the past year, we have reinforced our direct sales team that includes over 50 direct sales employees and independent sales representatives. In addition to these direct sales representatives, we continue to enjoy a strong relationship with scores of independent dealers. We believe we have the best trained and most knowledgeable sales force in the industry. We are actively seeking to expand our market penetration through increased distribution. To accomplish this, we have, for the first time in our history, made available to all distributors and qualified sales persons, a family of proprietary combination therapy devices, the Dynatron 25 Series. The availability of these products is attracting new distributors and sales persons. In addition, where these sales persons have had limited or no access to premier lines like the Dynatron SolarisPlus products, they will now be able to access these products in certain geographical areas through the authorized sales representative or dealer who has the rights to the products in those territories. Making these products more widely available will increase our ability to expand distribution of not only our own proprietary products, but also those we distribute on behalf of other manufacturers. This strategic expansion of distribution will begin to hit stride as the new ThermoStim product is released in the second fiscal quarter of 2014.
Pursuit of national accounts, including Group Purchasing Organizations (GPO) continues to be a strategic endeavor. However, securing such accounts has proven to be elusive as entrenched suppliers dominate many of the large GPO accounts. As a result, we have turned our attention more toward accessible national and regional accounts where we can more easily prove our value proposition. While we have not abandoned efforts to secure GPO and large national account business, we have become more strategic in our approach to such business. Last year we were successful in qualifying to be an approved vendor to the federal government, including the Veterans Administration hospitals and medical facilities associated with military installations. These types of contracts are strategically more accessible for us than GPO business.
Economic pressures from the recent recession in the United States have affected available credit that would facilitate large capital purchases, and have also reduced demand for discretionary services such as those provided by the purchasers of our aesthetic products. As a result, we reduced our expenses in the Synergie department. We believe that our aesthetic devices remain the best value on the market and we are seeking innovative ways to market these products, including strategic partnerships, both domestic and international, to help enhance sales momentum.
We have long believed that international markets present an untapped potential for growth and expansion. Adding new distributors in several countries will be the key to this expansion effort. We remain committed to finding the most effective ways to expand our markets internationally. Over the coming year, our efforts will be focused on partnering with key manufacturers and distributors interested in our product line or technology. Our Utah facility, where all electrotherapy, ultrasound, traction, phototherapy and Synergie products are manufactured, is certified to ISO 13485:2003, an internationally recognized standard of excellence in medical device manufacturing. This designation is an important requirement in obtaining the CE Mark certification, which allows us to market our products in the European Union and in other international locations. The introduction of several important new products has generated new interest on the part of some foreign distributors in Asia, Europe and South America. As we secure CE Mark Certification for our products we will be better able to explore the interest of these distributors. Refining our business model for supporting sales representatives and distributors will also be a focal point of operations. We will continue to evaluate the most efficient ways to maintain our satellite sales offices and warehouses. The ongoing refinement of this model is expected to yield further efficiencies that will better achieve sales goals while, at the same time, reduce expenses.
Our efforts to prudently reduce costs in the face of some economic uncertainty have made us a leaner operation. During fiscal year 2013 we implemented almost $1,000,000 in expense reductions. So far in fiscal 2014 we have identified another $500,000 annually in cost savings that have been or will be implemented to reduce expenses. We will continue to be vigilant in maintaining appropriate overhead costs and operating costs while still providing support for anticipated increases in sales from our new products.
Based on our defined strategic initiatives, we are focusing our resources in the following areas:
12
·
|
Increasing market share of manufactured capital products by promoting sales of our new state-of-the-art Dynatron SolarisPlus and 25 Series products.
|
·
|
Introducing additional new products such as the ThermoStim Probe to better capitalize on opportunities in our core markets.
|
·
|
Seeking to improve distribution of our products through recruitment of additional qualified sales representatives and dealers attracted by the many new products being offered and expanding the availability of proprietary combination therapy devices.
|
·
|
Increasing market share with our new 2013-14 product catalog featuring a broader product offering.
|
·
|
Continuing to seek ways of increasing business with GPOs, as well as through GSA contracts with the U.S. Government and to national and regional accounts.
|
·
|
Improving operational efficiencies by scaling costs to be reflective of current levels of sales. Strengthening pricing management and procurement methodologies.
|
·
|
Minimizing expense associated in the Synergie department until demand for capital equipment re-emerges, and, in the meantime, seeking additional independent distributors and strategic partnerships.
|
·
|
Focusing international sales efforts on identifying key distributors and strategic partners who could represent the Company’s product line, particularly in Europe and China.
|
·
|
Exploring strategic business alliances that will leverage and complement our competitive strengths, increase market reach and supplement capital resources.
|
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
The statements contained in this Form 10-Q, particularly the foregoing discussion in Part I, Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that are not purely historical, are “forward-looking statements” within the safe harbors provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These statements refer to our expectations, hopes, beliefs, anticipations, commitments, intentions and strategies regarding the future. They may be identified by the use of words or phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “should,” “plans,” “estimates,” “intends,” and “potential,” among others. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding product development, market acceptance, financial performance, revenue and expense levels in the future and the sufficiency of existing assets to fund future operations and capital spending needs. Actual results could differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are made as of the date of this report and we assume no obligation to update them or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in such forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
Our business is exposed to various market risks. Market risk is the potential risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates. We do not enter into derivative or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. There has been no material changes in our market risk during the quarter ended September 30, 2013. However, further weakening of the economy could result in greater risks of collections of accounts receivable.
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. As of September 30, 2013, approximately $3,631,637 of our debt bore interest at variable rates. Accordingly, our net income is affected by changes in interest rates. For every one hundred basis point change in the average interest rate under our existing debt, our annual interest expense would change by approximately $36,000. The Company’s variable interest rate debt consists primarily of the line of credit facility which can vary on a daily basis and a vehicle loan which is tied to the 5-year LIBOR Swap rate.
In the event of an adverse change in interest rates, we could take actions to mitigate our exposure. However, due to the uncertainty of the actions that would be taken and their possible effects, this analysis assumes no such actions.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness, as of September 30, 2013, of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. The purpose of this evaluation was to determine whether, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on their evaluation, our management has concluded, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2013.
13
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
(a) Exhibits
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of Dynatronics Laser Corporation. Incorporated by reference to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 2-85045) filed with the SEC and effective November 2, 1984
|
3.2
|
Articles of Amendment dated November 21, 1988 (previously filed)
|
3.3
|
Articles of Amendment dated November 18, 1993 (previously filed)
|
10.1
|
Loan Agreement with Zions Bank (previously filed)
|
10.2
|
Amended Loan Agreement with Zions Bank (previously filed)
|
10.3
|
1992 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (previously filed)
|
10.4
|
Dynatronics Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Award Plan (previously filed as Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on October 27, 2006)
|
10.5
|
Form of Option Agreement for the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan for incentive stock options (previously filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006)
|
10.6
|
Form of Option Agreement for the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan for non-qualified options (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006)
|
10.8
|
Executive Employment Agreement (Beardall) (previously filed as exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 7, 2011)
|
10.9
|
Executive Employment Agreement (Cullimore, Jr.) (previously filed as exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 28, 2012)
|
11
|
Computation of Net Income per Share (included in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
|
31.1
|
Certification under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of principal executive officer (filed herewith)
|
31.2
|
Certification under Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of principal financial officer (filed herewith)
|
32
|
Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith)
|
101 INS
|
XBRL Instance Document**
|
101 SCH
|
XBRL Schema Document**
|
101 CAL
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document**
|
101 DEF
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document**
|
101 LAB
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document**
|
101 PRE
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document**
|
** The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DYNATRONICS CORPORATION
Registrant
|
|
Date November 14, 2013
|
/s/ Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
|
Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Date November 14, 2013
|
/s/ Terry M. Atkinson, CPA
|
Terry M. Atkinson, CPA
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
15