DYNEX CAPITAL INC - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
þ Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the quarterly period June 30, 2006
o Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Commission
File Number: 1-9819
|
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
|
52-1549373
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
4551
Cox Road, Suite 300, Glen Allen, Virginia
|
23060-6740
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(804)
217-5800
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
On
June 30, 2006, the registrant had 12,130,831shares outstanding of common
stock,
$.01 par value, which is the registrant’s only class of common
stock.
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
FORM
10-Q
Page
|
|||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
|||
1
|
|||
2
|
|||
3
|
|||
4
|
|||
Item
2.
|
12
|
||
Item
3.
|
26
|
||
Item
4.
|
27
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
28
|
||
Item
1A.
|
28
|
||
Item
2.
|
29
|
||
Item
3.
|
29
|
||
Item
4.
|
29
|
||
Item
5.
|
30
|
||
Item
6.
|
30
|
||
31
|
i
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
BALANCE
SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(amounts
in thousands except share data)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
47,692
|
$
|
45,235
|
|||
Other
assets
|
4,273
|
4,332
|
|||||
51,965
|
49,567
|
||||||
Investments:
|
|||||||
Securitized
finance receivables, net
|
668,143
|
722,152
|
|||||
Securities
|
16,186
|
24,908
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
3,524
|
4,067
|
|||||
Other
loans
|
4,674
|
5,282
|
|||||
692,527
|
756,409
|
||||||
$
|
744,492
|
$
|
805,976
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||
Securitization
financing:
|
|||||||
Non-recourse
securitization financing
|
$
|
487,429
|
$
|
516,578
|
|||
Repurchase
agreements secured by securitization financing
|
113,488
|
133,104
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements secured by securities
|
84
|
211
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
7,108
|
6,749
|
|||||
608,109
|
656,642
|
||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 11)
|
|||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
|||||||
9.5%
Cumulative Convertible Series D,
|
|||||||
4,221,539
and 5,628,737 shares issued and outstanding, respectively,
|
|||||||
($43,218
and $57,624 aggregate liquidation
|
|||||||
preference,
respectively)
|
41,749
|
55,666
|
|||||
Common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, 100,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
|||||||
12,130,831
and 12,163,391 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
121
|
122
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
366,633
|
366,903
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
588
|
140
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(272,708
|
)
|
(273,497
|
)
|
|||
136,383
|
149,334
|
||||||
$
|
744,492
|
$
|
805,976
|
||||
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
1
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
OF
OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Interest
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Securitized
finance receivables
|
$
|
13,139
|
$
|
16,927
|
$
|
27,025
|
$
|
38,924
|
|||||
Securities
|
426
|
938
|
973
|
2,064
|
|||||||||
Other
investments
|
463
|
209
|
690
|
467
|
|||||||||
Other
loans
|
164
|
459
|
270
|
1,131
|
|||||||||
14,192
|
18,533
|
28,958
|
42,586
|
||||||||||
Interest
and related expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Non-recourse
securitization financing
|
10,201
|
15,410
|
21,189
|
33,515
|
|||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
1,519
|
436
|
3,034
|
1,886
|
|||||||||
Other
|
(71
|
)
|
(45
|
)
|
(96
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
|||||
11,649
|
15,801
|
24,127
|
35,397
|
||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
2,543
|
2,732
|
4,831
|
7,189
|
|||||||||
(Provision
for) recapture of loan losses
|
-
|
(664
|
)
|
119
|
(2,925
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,543
|
2,068
|
4,950
|
4,264
|
|||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
-
|
(1,586
|
)
|
-
|
(1,673
|
)
|
|||||||
Gain
on sale of investments, net
|
116
|
9,552
|
140
|
9,850
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
121
|
958
|
230
|
978
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,165
|
)
|
(1,398
|
)
|
(2,492
|
)
|
(2,890
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income
|
1,615
|
9,594
|
2,828
|
10,529
|
|||||||||
Preferred
stock charge
|
(1,003
|
)
|
(1,337
|
)
|
(2,039
|
)
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income to common shareholders
|
$
|
612
|
$
|
8,257
|
$
|
789
|
$
|
7,855
|
|||||
Change
in net unrealized gain/(loss) on :
|
|||||||||||||
Investments
classified as available-for-sale
|
84
|
(465
|
)
|
448
|
(4,348
|
)
|
|||||||
Hedge
instruments
|
-
|
201
|
-
|
584
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
1,699
|
$
|
9,330
|
$
|
3,276
|
$
|
6,765
|
|||||
Net
income per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.68
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.54
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
0.59
|
|||||
See
notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
2
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
OF
CASH
FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(amounts
in thousands)
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
2,828
|
$
|
10,529
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash
|
|||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
|||||||
(Recapture
of) provision for loan loss
|
(119
|
)
|
2,925
|
||||
Impairment
charges
|
-
|
1,673
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of investments
|
(141
|
)
|
(9,850
|
)
|
|||
Amortization
and depreciation
|
346
|
1,106
|
|||||
Compensation
expense for stock options
|
104
|
-
|
|||||
Net
change in other assets and other liabilities
|
752
|
298
|
|||||
Net
cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities
|
3,770
|
6,681
|
|||||
Investing
activities:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments received on investments
|
51,479
|
66,740
|
|||||
Purchase
of securities and other investments
|
(16,642
|
)
|
(34,770
|
)
|
|||
Payments
received on securities, other investments and loans
|
26,238
|
29,580
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of securities and other investments
|
1,136
|
18,374
|
|||||
Other
|
(561
|
)
|
179
|
||||
Net
cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities
|
61,650
|
80,103
|
|||||
Financing
activities:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on non-recourse securitization financing
|
(26,555
|
)
|
(59,656
|
)
|
|||
Net
(repayment of) borrowings under repurchase agreement
|
(19,743
|
)
|
142,466
|
||||
Redemption
of securitization financing bonds
|
-
|
(195,653
|
)
|
||||
Retirement
of common stock
|
(220
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Retirement
of preferred stock
|
(14,072
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Dividends
paid
|
(2,373
|
)
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash and cash equivalents used for financing activities
|
(62,963
|
)
|
(115,517
|
)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
2,457
|
(28,733
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
45,235
|
52,522
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
47,692
|
$
|
23,789
|
3
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
June
30,
2006
(amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
NOTE
1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in
accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the
information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in
the United States of America, hereinafter referred to as “generally accepted
accounting principles,” for complete financial statements. The condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dynex Capital, Inc.
and its qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) subsidiaries and taxable
REIT subsidiary (together, “Dynex” or the “Company”). All inter-company balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company consolidates entities in which it owns more than 50% of the voting
equity and control does not rest with others. The Company follows the equity
method of accounting for investments with greater than 20% and less than a
50%
interest in partnerships and corporate joint ventures or when it is able to
influence the financial and operating policies of the investee but owns less
than 50% of the voting equity. For all other investments, the cost method is
applied.
The
Company believes it has complied with the requirements for qualification as
a
REIT under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). To the extent the Company
qualifies as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, it generally will not
be
subject to federal income tax on the amount of its income or gain that is
distributed as dividends to shareholders.
In
the
opinion of management, all significant adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed
consolidated financial statements have been included. The financial statements
presented are unaudited. Operating results for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the year ending December 31, 2006. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted.
The unaudited financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. The primary estimates inherent in
the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are discussed
below.
The
Company uses estimates in establishing fair value for its financial instruments.
Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried in the accompanying
financial statements at estimated fair value. Estimates of fair value for
securities are based on market prices provided by certain dealers, when
available. When market prices are not available, fair value estimates are
determined by calculating the present value of the projected cash flows of
the
instruments using market-based assumptions such as estimated future interest
rates and estimated market spreads to applicable indices for comparable
securities, and using collateral based assumptions such as prepayment rates
and
credit loss assumptions based on the most recent performance and anticipated
performance of the underlying collateral.
The
Company also has credit risk on loans in its portfolio as discussed in Note
4.
An allowance for loan losses has been estimated and established for currently
existing losses in the loan portfolio, which are deemed probable as to their
occurrence. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated and adjusted periodically
by management based on the actual and estimated timing and amount of probable
credit losses. Provisions made to increase or decrease the allowance for loan
losses are presented as provision for losses in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s actual credit losses may
differ from those estimates used to establish the allowance.
Certain
amounts for 2005 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted
in 2006.
4
NOTE
2 - NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Net
income per common share is presented on both a basic and diluted per common
share basis. Diluted net income per common share assumes the conversion of
the
convertible preferred stock into common stock, using the if-converted method,
and stock appreciation rights and options to the extent that they are
outstanding, using the treasury stock method, but only if these items are
dilutive. The Series D preferred stock is convertible into one share of common
stock for each share of preferred stock. The following table reconciles the
numerator and denominator for both basic and diluted net income per common
share
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Number
Of
Shares
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,615
|
$
|
9,594
|
$
|
2,828
|
$
|
10,529
|
|||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock charge
|
(1,003
|
)
|
(1,337
|
)
|
(2,039
|
)
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
income to common shareholders
|
$
|
612
|
12,138,469
|
$
|
8,257
|
12,163,061
|
$
|
789
|
12,150,011
|
$
|
7,855
|
12,162,728
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.68
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.54
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
0.59
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation
of shares included in calculation of earnings per share due to
dilutive
effect
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series
D preferred stock
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
(1,337
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
(2,674
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
|||||||||||
Expense
and incremental shares of stock appreciation rights
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
129
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
$ | - |
-
|
$
|
(1,337
|
)
|
5,628,737
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
(2,674
|
)
|
5,628,866
|
|||||||||||
Reconciliation
of shares not included in calculation of earnings per share due
to
anti-dilutive effect
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series
D preferred stock
|
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
4,221,539
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
(2,039
|
)
|
4,291,510
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Expense
and incremental shares of stock appreciation rights
|
-
|
(89,162
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(89,757
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
4,132,377
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
(2,039
|
)
|
4,201,753
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
5
NOTE
3 - SECURITIZED FINANCE RECEIVABLES
The
following table summarizes the components of securitized finance receivables
at
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Collateral:
|
|||||||
Commercial
|
$
|
535,528
|
$
|
570,199
|
|||
Single-family
|
136,954
|
161,058
|
|||||
672,482
|
731,257
|
||||||
Funds
held by trustees, including funds held for defeasance
|
7,456
|
6,648
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
4,883
|
5,114
|
|||||
Unamortized
discounts and premiums, net
|
(1,809
|
)
|
(1,832
|
)
|
|||
Loans,
at amortized cost
|
683,012
|
741,187
|
|||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(14,869
|
)
|
(19,035
|
)
|
|||
$
|
668,143
|
$
|
722,152
|
The
commercial securitized finance receivables are encumbered by non-recourse
securitization financing. The non-recourse securitization financing bonds
collateralized by the single-family loans that were redeemed by the Company
during 2005 remain outstanding and are held by the Company as of June 30, 2006.
The redeemed bonds, which are eliminated from the condensed consolidated
financial statements in consolidation, collateralize the repurchase agreement,
which partially financed the redemption of these bonds. This repurchase
agreement has been presented as securitization financing in the financial
statements.
NOTE
4 - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The
Company reserves for probable estimated credit losses on securitized finance
receivables and other loans in its investment portfolio. The following table
summarizes the aggregate activity for the allowance for loan losses for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006
and
2005, respectively:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Allowance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
18,913
|
$
|
27,681
|
$
|
19,035
|
$
|
28,014
|
|||||
Provision
for (recapture of) loan losses
|
-
|
664
|
(119
|
)
|
2,925
|
||||||||
Charge-offs,
net of recoveries
|
(4,044
|
)
|
(499
|
)
|
(4,047
|
)
|
(3,093
|
)
|
|||||
Portfolio
sold
|
-
|
(11,310
|
)
|
-
|
(11,310
|
)
|
|||||||
Allowance
at end of period
|
$
|
14,869
|
$
|
16,536
|
$
|
14,869
|
$
|
16,536
|
The
Company identified $43,295 and $54,558 of impaired commercial mortgage loans
at
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The decline is primarily
due
to improvements in the performance of the underlying real estate collateralizing
the impaired loans and the liquidation of a $7,769 non-performing loan. At
June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had approximately $27,940 and
$39,758 of commercial mortgage loans that were sixty or more days delinquent.
One of these loans, with an unpaid principal balance of $23,161 was in
foreclosure at June 30, 2006 and was subsequently purchased at the foreclosure
sale in July 2006.
6
NOTE
5 - OTHER INVESTMENTS
The
following table summarizes the Company’s other investments at June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005:
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Delinquent
property tax receivable securities
|
$
|
2,804
|
$
|
3,220
|
|||
Real
estate owned
|
720
|
847
|
|||||
$
|
3,524
|
$
|
4,067
|
Delinquent
property tax receivable securities includes an unrealized gain of $311 and
$55
at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Real estate owned is
acquired from foreclosures on delinquent property tax receivables. During the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company collected an aggregate
of
$1,043 and $1,582, respectively, on delinquent property tax receivables and
securities, including net sales proceeds from the related real estate owned.
NOTE
6 - SECURITIES
The
following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s securities classified
as available-for-sale at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Effective
Interest Rate
|
Fair
Value
|
Effective
Interest Rate
|
||||||||||
Securities,
available-for-sale:
|
|||||||||||||
Fixed-rate
mortgage securities
|
$
|
13,307
|
7.29
|
%
|
$
|
22,900
|
6.14
|
%
|
|||||
Equity
securities
|
2,602
|
1,602
|
|||||||||||
Other
securities
|
-
|
320
|
|||||||||||
15,909
|
24,822
|
||||||||||||
Gross
unrealized gains
|
446
|
332
|
|||||||||||
Gross
unrealized losses
|
(169
|
)
|
(246
|
)
|
|||||||||
$
|
16,186
|
$
|
24,908
|
NOTE
7 - OTHER LOANS
The
following table summarizes Dynex’s carrying basis for other loans at June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Single-family
mortgage loans
|
$
|
4,210
|
$
|
4,825
|
|||
Multifamily
and commercial mortgage loan participations
|
979
|
995
|
|||||
5,189
|
5,820
|
||||||
Unamortized
discounts
|
(515
|
)
|
(538
|
)
|
|||
$
|
4,674
|
$
|
5,282
|
NOTE
8 - NON-RECOURSE SECURITIZATION FINANCING
Dynex,
through limited-purpose finance subsidiaries, has issued bonds pursuant to
indentures in the form of non-recourse securitization financing. Each series
of
securitization financing may consist of various classes of bonds, either at
fixed or variable rates of interest. Payments received on securitized finance
receivables and any reinvestment income thereon are used to make payments on
the
securitization financing (see Note 3). The obligations under the securitization
financings are payable solely from the securitized finance receivables and
are
otherwise non-recourse to Dynex. The stated maturity date for each class of
bonds is generally calculated based on the final scheduled payment date of
the
underlying collateral pledged. The actual maturity of each class will be
directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments on the related
collateral. Each
7
series
is
also subject to redemption at Dynex’s option according to specific terms of the
respective indentures. As a result, the actual maturity of any class of a series
of securitization financing is likely to occur earlier than its stated maturity.
If Dynex does not exercise its option to redeem a class or classes of bonds
when
it first has the right to do so, the interest rates on the bonds not redeemed
will automatically increase by 0.30% to 2.00%.
Dynex
may
retain certain bond classes of securitization financing issued, including
investment grade classes, financing these retained bonds with equity. As these
limited-purpose finance subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
statements of Dynex, such retained bonds are eliminated in the consolidated
financial statements, while the associated repurchase agreements outstanding,
if
any, are included as recourse debt.
The
components of non-recourse securitization financing along with certain other
information at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are summarized as
follows:
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||||||||
Bonds
Outstanding
|
Range
of Interest Rates
|
Bonds
Outstanding
|
Range
of Interest Rates
|
||||||||||
Fixed-rate
classes
|
$
|
483,368
|
6.6%
- 8.8
|
%
|
$
|
509,923
|
6.6%
- 8.8
|
%
|
|||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
3,257
|
3,438
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
costs
|
(14,547
|
)
|
(16,912
|
)
|
|||||||||
Unamortized
net bond premium
|
15,351
|
20,129
|
|||||||||||
$
|
487,429
|
$
|
516,578
|
||||||||||
Range
of stated maturities
|
2009-2028
|
2009-2028
|
|||||||||||
Number
of series
|
3
|
3
|
At
June
30, 2006, the weighted-average coupon on the fixed rate classes was 6.8%. The
average effective rate on non-recourse securitization financing, which includes
the amortization of the related bond premium and deferred costs, was 8.3%,
and
7.4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31,
2005, respectively.
NOTE
9 - REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
The
Company uses repurchase agreements, which are recourse to the Company, to
finance certain of its investments. The Company had repurchase agreements of
$113,488 and $133,104, at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively,
which are collateralized by certain securitization financing bonds that were
redeemed during 2005. The repurchase agreements mature monthly and have a
weighted average rate of 0.10% over one-month LIBOR (5.44% at June 30, 2006).
The securitization financing bonds collateralizing these repurchase agreements
have a fair value of $130,235 at June 30, 2006 and pay interest at a blended
rate of one-month LIBOR plus 0.31%.
Dynex
also utilizes other recourse repurchase agreements to finance certain of its
securities. There were $84 and $211 outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December
31, 2005, respectively, which were collateralized by securities with a market
value of $10,036 and $20,133, respectively. These repurchase agreements bear
interest based on one-month LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 0.20% to 0.60%,
which represented a weighted average rate of 5.58% at June 30, 2006.
NOTE
10 - PREFERRED STOCK
In
January 2006, Dynex redeemed 1,407,198 shares of the outstanding 9.5% Series
D
Preferred stock with cash of $14,105.
At
June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the liquidation preference on the Preferred
Stock was $43,218 and $57,624, respectively, and includes accrued dividends
payable of $0.2375 per share or $1,003 and $1,337 at June 30, 2006 and December
31, 2005, respectively.
8
NOTE
11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As
discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries are defendants
in
litigation. The following discussion is the current status of the
litigation.
GLS
Capital, Inc. (“GLS”), a subsidiary of the Company, and the County of Allegheny,
Pennsylvania (“Allegheny County”), are defendants in a lawsuit in the Court of
Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the “Court”). Plaintiffs
allege that GLS illegally charged the taxpayers of Allegheny County certain
attorney fees, costs and expenses, and interest in the collection of delinquent
property tax receivables owned by GLS. Plaintiffs are seeking class action
status. During 2005, the Court held hearings in this matter, and has not
yet ruled on whether it will grant class action status in the litigation.
Plaintiffs have not enumerated its damages in this matter. The Company
believes that the ultimate outcome of this litigation will not have a material
impact on its financial condition, but may have a material impact on reported
results for the particular period presented.
The
Company and Dynex Commercial, Inc. (“DCI”), formerly an affiliate of the Company
and now known as DCI Commercial, Inc., are appellees (or “respondents”) in the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Judicial District of Texas at Dallas, related
to
the matter of Basic Capital Management et al (collectively, “BCM” or “the
Plaintiffs”) versus Dynex Commercial, Inc. et al. Plaintiff’s appeal seeks to
overturn a judgment in favor of the Company and DCI which denied recovery to
Plaintiffs, and to have a judgment entered in favor of Plaintiffs based on
a
jury award for damages against the Company of $253, and against DCI for $2,200
or $25,600, all of which was set aside by the trial court. In the
alternative, Plaintiffs are seeking a new trial. The Court of Appeals heard
the
oral argument on the matter on April 18, 2006 but have not yet issued a ruling
on the appeal.
On
February 11, 2005, a putative class action complaint alleging violations of
the
federal securities laws and various state common law claims was filed against
Dynex Capital, Inc., our subsidiary MERIT Securities Corporation, Stephen J.
Benedetti, the Company's Executive Vice President, and Thomas H. Potts, the
Company's former President and a former Director, in United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York ("District Court") by the Teamsters
Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund ("Teamsters"). The lawsuit
purported to be a class action on behalf of purchasers of MERIT Series 13
securitization financing bonds, which are collateralized by manufactured housing
loans. On May 31, 2005, the Teamsters filed an amended class action
complaint. The amended complaint dropped all state common law claims but
added federal securities claims related to the MERIT Series 12 securitization
financing bonds. On July 15, 2005, the defendants moved to
dismiss the amended complaint. On February 10, 2006, the District Court
dismissed the claims against Messrs. Benedetti and Potts, but did not dismiss
the claims against Dynex and MERIT. On February 24, 2006, Dynex
and MERIT moved for reconsideration and interlocutory appeal of the District
Court's order denying the motion to dismiss Dynex and MERIT. The
Company has evaluated the allegations and believes them to be without merit
and
intends to continue to vigorously defend itself against them.
Although
no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the above
litigation, the Company believes the resolution of these lawsuits will not
have
a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet but could materially affect
our consolidated results of operations in a given year.
NOTE
12 - STOCK
BASED COMPENSATION
Pursuant
to Dynex’s shareholder approved 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), Dynex may grant to eligible
officers, directors and employees stock options, stock appreciation rights
(“SARs”) and restricted stock awards. An aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of common
stock is available for distribution pursuant to the Employee Incentive Plan.
Dynex may also grant dividend equivalent rights (“DERs”) in connection with the
grant of options or SARs.
Effective
January 1, 2006, Dynex adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123(R)) using the
modified-prospective-transition method. Under this transition method,
compensation cost in 2006 includes cost for options granted prior to but not
vested as of December 31, 2005, and options vested in 2006. Therefore results
for prior periods have not been restated.
9
On
January 2, 2005, Dynex granted 126,297 SARs to certain of its employees and
officers under the Stock Incentive Plan. The SARs vest over the next four years
in equal annual installments, expire on December 31, 2011 and have an exercise
price of $7.81 per share, which was the market price of the stock on the grant
date.
On
June
17, 2005, Dynex granted options to acquire an aggregate of 40,000 shares of
common stock to the members of its Board of Directors under the Stock Incentive
Plan. The options have an exercise price of $8.46 per share, which represents
110% of the closing stock price on the grant date, expire on June 17, 2010
and
were fully vested when granted.
On
January 12, 2006, Dynex granted 77,000 SARs to certain of its employees and
officers
under
the Stock Incentive Plan. The SARs vest over the next four years in equal annual
installments, expire on December 31, 2012 and have an exercise price of $6.61
per share, which was the market price of the stock on the grant
date.
On
June
16, 2006, the Company granted options to acquire an aggregate of 35,000 shares
of common stock to the members of its Board of Directors under the Stock
Incentive Plan, which had a fair value of approximately $64 on the grant date.
The options have an exercise price of $7.43 per share, which represents 110%
of
the closing stock price on the grant date, expire on June 16, 2011, and were
fully vested when granted.
The
following table presents the 2005 effect on net income and earnings per share
if
the Company had applied the fair value method to the SARs and options granted
to
employees and Directors using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model.
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2005
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30, 2005
|
|||||
Net
income to common shareholders
|
$
|
8,257
|
$
|
7,855
|
|||
Fair
value method stock based compensation expense
|
(84
|
)
|
(100
|
)
|
|||
Pro
forma net income to common shareholders
|
$
|
8,173
|
$
|
7,755
|
|||
|
|||||||
Net
income per common share:
|
|||||||
Basic
- as reported
|
$
|
0.68
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||
Basic
- pro forma
|
$
|
0.67
|
$
|
0.64
|
|||
Diluted
- as reported
|
$
|
0.54
|
$
|
0.59
|
|||
Diluted
- pro forma
|
$
|
0.53
|
$
|
0.59
|
|||
|
The
following table presents a summary of the SAR activity for the Stock Incentive
Plan:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30, 2006
|
June
30, 2006
|
||||||||||||
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||
SARs
outstanding at beginning of period
|
203,297
|
7.36
|
126,297
|
7.81
|
|||||||||
SARs
granted
|
-
|
-
|
77,000
|
6.61
|
|||||||||
SARs
forfeited or redeemed
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
SARs
exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
SARs
outstanding at end of period
|
203,297
|
7.36
|
203,297
|
7.36
|
|||||||||
SARs
vested and exercisable
|
31,574
|
7.81
|
31,574
|
7.81
|
10
The
following table presents a summary of the option activity for the Stock
Incentive Plan:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30, 2006
|
June
30, 2006
|
||||||||||||
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding at beginning of period
|
40,000
|
8.46
|
40,000
|
8.46
|
|||||||||
Options
granted
|
35,000
|
7.43
|
35,000
|
7.43
|
|||||||||
Options
forfeited or redeemed
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Options
exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Options
outstanding at end of period
|
75,000
|
7.98
|
75,000
|
7.98
|
|||||||||
Options
vested and exercisable
|
75,000
|
7.98
|
75,000
|
7.98
|
NOTE
13
- RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
late
2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) staff issued Staff
Position (FSP) 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its
Application to Certain Investments. This FSP provides additional guidance on
when an investment in a debt or equity security should be considered impaired
and when that impairment should be considered other-than-temporary and
recognized as a loss. Additionally, the FSP requires certain disclosures about
unrealized losses which have not been recognized as other-than-temporary. This
guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements upon implementation on January 1, 2006.
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments”. Key provisions of SFAS 155 include: (1) a broad
fair value measurement option for certain hybrid financial instruments that
contain an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation;
(2) clarification that only the simplest separations of interest payments
and principal payments qualify for the exception afforded to interest-only
strips and principal-only strips from derivative accounting under paragraph
14
of FAS 133 (thereby narrowing such exception); (3) a requirement that
beneficial interests in securitized financial assets be analyzed to determine
whether they are freestanding derivatives or whether they are hybrid instruments
that contain embedded derivatives requiring bifurcation; (4) clarification
that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives; and (5) elimination of the prohibition on a Qualified Special
Purpose Entity (“QSPE”) holding passive derivative financial instruments that
pertain to beneficial interests that are or contain a derivative financial
instrument. In general, these changes will reduce the operational complexity
associated with bifurcating embedded derivatives, and increase the number of
beneficial interests in securitization transactions, including interest-only
strips and principal-only strips, required to be accounted for in accordance
with FAS 133. Management does not believe that SFAS 155 will have a material
effect on the financial statements of the Company.
In
March
2006 the FASB issued SFAS No.156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets--an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (SFAS 156). This Statement
amends FASB Statement No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities,
with
respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities. This Statement requires an entity to recognize a
servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation
to
service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain
situations and to initially measure those servicing assets and servicing
liabilities at fair value, if practicable. SFAS 156 permits an entity to measure
each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities
by either amortizing the servicing asset or liability and assessing the mortgage
servicing asset or servicing liability for impairment at each reporting date.
Alternatively, an entity may choose to measure the servicing asset or servicing
liability at fair value at each reporting date and report changes in fair value
in earnings in the period the changes occur. SFAS 156 permits, at its initial
adoption, a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to
trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights, without calling
into question the
11
treatment
of other available-for-sale securities under Statement 115, provided that the
available-for-sale securities are identified in some manner as offsetting the
entity’s exposure to changes in fair value of servicing assets or servicing
liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value. This
statement is effective as of the beginning of its first fiscal year that begins
after September 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact this statement may have on its financial statements.
The
following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2006 should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
report.
The
Company is a specialty
finance company organized as a real estate investment trust (REIT)
that
invests in loans and securities consisting principally of single family
residential and commercial mortgage loans. The
Company finances these loans and securities through a combination of
non-recourse securitization financing, repurchase agreements, and equity. Dynex
employs financing in order to increase the overall yield on its invested
capital.
The
Company has an investment policy which is reviewed and approved annually by
the
Board of Directors. The investment policy provides the framework for the
allocation of the Company’s investment capital into various funds or strategies,
each with its own specific investment objective. These strategies or funds
include a liquidity fund, consisting primarily of cash and equivalents, a fixed
income fund, consisting primarily of high-quality mortgage securities, a
residual investment fund, consisting of primarily credit-sensitive investments
with structured leverage (securitization financing), and a strategic fund,
consisting primarily of equity and equity-like investments. The Company
currently manages the capital allocated to these strategies but is currently
seeking joint-venture or other arrangements with money managers, Wall Street
firms, other mortgage REITs, hedge funds, and specialty finance companies for
leveraging their expertise and resources. To date the Company has had numerous
discussions with potential third parties. The Company has sought and will
continue to seek a diversification of its capital invested in credit-sensitive
investments, predominantly its commercial mortgage securities.
The
Company continued repurchasing its common shares during the quarter under the
stock repurchase plan authorized by the Company's Board of Directors. The
Company repurchased 12,260 shares of its common stock during the quarter at
an
average cost of $6.80 per share and may repurchase up to an additional 967,440
shares under the current Board authorization. Subject to the applicable
securities laws and the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock designation,
future repurchases of common stock will be made at times and in amounts as
the
Company deems appropriate and may be suspended or discontinued at any
time.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations are based in large part upon its consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Critical
accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant
judgments or uncertainties, and which may result in materially different results
under different assumptions and conditions, or the application of which may
have
a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The following are the
Company’s critical accounting policies.
Consolidation
of Subsidiaries.
The
consolidated financial statements represent the Company’s accounts after the
elimination of inter-company transactions. The Company consolidates entities
in
which it owns more than 50% of the voting equity and control of the entity
does
not rest with others. The Company follows the equity method of accounting for
investments with greater than 20% and less than a 50% interest in partnerships
and corporate joint ventures or when it is able to influence the financial
and
operating policies of the investee but owns less than 50% of the voting equity.
For all other investments, the cost method is applied.
12
Impairments.
The
Company evaluates all securities in its investment portfolio for
other-than-temporary impairments. A security is generally defined to be
other-than-temporarily impaired if, for a maximum period of three consecutive
quarters, the carrying value of such security exceeds its estimated fair value
and we estimate, based on projected future cash flows or other fair value
determinants, that the fair value will remain below the carrying value for
the
foreseeable future. If an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to exist,
the Company records an impairment charge to adjust the carrying value of the
security down to its estimated fair value. In certain instances, as a result
of
the other-than-temporary impairment analysis, the recognition or accrual of
interest will be discontinued and the security will be placed on non-accrual
status.
Dynex
considers an investment to be impaired if the fair value of the investment
is
less than its recorded cost basis. Impairments of other investments are
generally considered to be other-than-temporary when the fair value remains
below the carrying value for three consecutive quarters. If the impairment
is
determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded in
order
to adjust the carrying value of the investment to its estimated
value.
Allowance
for Loan Losses.
The
Company has credit risk on loans pledged in securitization financing
transactions and classified as securitized finance receivables in its investment
portfolio. An allowance for loan losses has been estimated and established
for
currently existing probable losses. Factors considered in establishing an
allowance include current loan delinquencies, historical cure rates of
delinquent loans, and historical and anticipated loss severity of the loans
as
they are liquidated. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated and adjusted
periodically by management based on the actual and estimated timing and amount
of probable credit losses, using the above factors, as well as industry loss
experience. Where loans are considered homogeneous, the allowance for loan
losses is established and evaluated on a pool basis. Otherwise, the allowance
for loan losses is established and evaluated on a loan-specific basis.
Provisions made to increase the allowance are a current period expense to
operations.
Generally,
single-family loans are considered impaired when they are 60-days past due.
Commercial mortgage loans are evaluated on an individual basis for impairment.
Generally, given its collateral dependent nature, a commercial loan with a
debt
service coverage ratio of less than one is considered impaired. However, based
on information specific to a commercial loan, commercial loans with a debt
service coverage ratio less than one may not be considered impaired; conversely,
commercial loans with a debt service coverage ratio greater than one may be
considered impaired. Certain of the commercial mortgage loans are covered by
loan guarantees that limit the Company’s exposure on these loans. The level of
allowance for loan losses required for these loans is reduced by the amount
of
applicable loan guarantees. The Company’s actual credit losses may differ from
the estimates used to establish the allowance.
13
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Below
is
a discussion of the Company's financial condition.
(amounts
in thousands except per share data)
|
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||
Investments:
|
|||||||
Securitized
finance receivables, net
|
$
|
668,143
|
$
|
722,152
|
|||
Securities
|
16,186
|
24,908
|
|||||
Other
loans
|
4,674
|
5,282
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
3,524
|
4,067
|
|||||
Non-recourse
securitization financing
|
487,429
|
516,578
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements secured
by securitization financing bonds
|
113,488
|
133,104
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements secured
by securities
|
84
|
211
|
|||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
136,383
|
149,334
|
|||||
Common
book value per share
|
7.76
|
7.65
|
Securitized
finance receivables. Securitized
finance receivables decreased to $668.1 million at June 30, 2006 compared to
$722.2 million at December 31, 2005. This decrease of $54.1 million is primarily
the result of $40.6 million of unscheduled and $10.8 million of scheduled
principal payments on the loan collateral and $2.7 million of other items
principally related to the liquidation of certain foreclosed securitized
commercial loans.
Securities. Securities
decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2006 by $8.7 million, to $16.2
million at June 30, 2006 from $24.9 million at December 31, 2005 due primarily
to principal payments of $25.0 million received on securities during the period.
This decrease was partially offset by $16.6 million of security purchases during
the period. The Company sold $0.8 million of equity securities during the period
for a gain of $0.1 million and had a net increase of $0.2 million in the net
unrealized gain on securities.
Other
investments.
Other
investments at June 30, 2006 consist primarily of a security collateralized
by
delinquent property tax receivables. Other investments decreased from $4.1
million at December 31, 2005 to $3.5 million at June 30, 2006. This decrease
is
primarily the result of collections on the tax liens and proceeds from the
sale
of real estate owned properties which totaled $1.0 million during the quarter.
This decrease was partially offset by an increase in the unrealized gain of
$0.3
million on the security and $0.2 million of capitalized recoverable
advances.
Other
loans.
Other
loans decreased by $0.6 million from $5.3 million at December 31, 2005 to $4.7
million at June 30, 2006 primarily as the result of scheduled and unscheduled
pay-downs during the period.
Non-recourse
securitization
financing. Non-recourse
securitization financing decreased $29.2 million, from $516.6 million at
December 31, 2005 to $487.4 million at June 30, 2006. This decrease was
primarily a result of principal payments of $26.6 million on the non-recourse
securitization financing made from the collections on the related securitized
finance receivables and a reduction in bond premium of approximately $3.1
million.
Repurchase
Agreements. The
balance of repurchase agreements declined to $113.6 million at June 30, 2006
from $133.3 million at December 31, 2005. The decrease was due to net repayments
of $19.7 during the period as a result of principal received on the underlying
investments being financed.
Shareholders’
equity.
Shareholders'
equity decreased to $136.4 million at June 30, 2006 from $149.3 million at
December 31, 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of the redemption
of
1,407,198 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and the repurchase of 32,560 shares
of common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2006, which contributed
to
a $14.3 million decrease in equity, and the preferred stock dividend of $2.0
million. These decreases were partially offset by net income of $2.8 million
for
the period, a $0.4 million increase in net unrealized gains on securities and
a
$0.1 increase in equity for the fair value of the stock options granted to
the
members of the Company’s Board of Directors during the second quarter of
2006.
14
Supplemental
Discussion of Investments
As
further discussed below, the Company manages its investment portfolio on a
net
investment basis, consisting of the amortized cost basis or fair value of the
investment less the associated external financing of the investment, if any.
Below is the net basis of the Company's investments as of June 30, 2006.
Excluded from this table are cash and cash equivalents, other assets, and other
liabilities.
As
the
cash flows received on our investments are generally subordinate to the
obligations under the associated financing of the investment, the investment
portfolio is evaluated and managed based on the net capital invested in that
particular investment. Net capital invested is generally defined as the cost
basis of the investment net of the associated financing for that investment.
For
securitized finance receivables, because the securitization financing is
recourse only to the finance receivables pledged and is, therefore, not a
general obligation of the Company, the risk on the investment in securitized
finance receivables from an economic point of view is limited to the Company's
net retained investment in the securitization trust. Below is the net basis
of
Dynex's investments as of June 30, 2006. Included in the table is an estimate
of
the fair value of the net investment. The fair value of the net investment
in
securitized finance receivables is based on the present value of the projected
cash flow from the collateral, adjusted for the impact and assumed level of
future prepayments and credit losses, less the projected principal and interest
due on the securitization financing bonds owned by third parties. The fair
value
of securities is based on quotes obtained from third-party dealers, or from
management estimates.
(amounts
in thousands)
|
June
30, 2006
|
||||||||||||
|
Amortized
cost basis
|
Financing
|
Net
basis
|
Fair
value of net basis
(1)
|
|||||||||
Securitized
finance receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Single
family mortgage loans
|
$
|
139,456
|
$
|
113,488
|
$
|
25,968
|
$
|
26,597
|
|||||
Commercial
mortgage loans
|
543,556
|
487,429
|
56,127
|
39,944
|
|||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(14,869
|
)
|
-
|
(14,869
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
|
668,143
|
600,917
|
67,226
|
66,541
|
|||||||||
Securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Investment
grade single-family
|
12,750
|
84
|
12,666
|
12,751
|
|||||||||
Non-investment
grade single-family
|
641
|
-
|
641
|
641
|
|||||||||
Equity
and other
|
2,795
|
-
|
2,795
|
2,795
|
|||||||||
|
16,186
|
84
|
16,102
|
16,187
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Other
loans and investments
|
8,198
|
-
|
8,198
|
9,356
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
692,527
|
$
|
601,001
|
$
|
91,526
|
$
|
92,084
|
|||||
|
(1)
|
Fair
values are based on dealer quotes or bids from independent third
parties,
and where dealer quotes are not available fair values are calculated
as
the net present value of expected future cash flows, discounted
at 16%.
Fair value also includes capital invested in redeemed securitization
financing bonds. Expected future cash flows were based on the forward
LIBOR curve as of June 30, 2006, and incorporate the resetting
of the
interest rates on the adjustable rate assets to a level consistent
with
projected prevailing rates. Expected cash flows were also based
on
estimated prepayment speeds and credit losses on the underlying
loans set
forth in the table below. Increases or decreases in interest rates
and
index levels from those used would impact the calculation of fair
value,
as would differences in actual prepayment speeds and credit losses
versus
the assumptions set forth
above.
|
15
The
following table summarizes the assumptions used in estimating fair value for
our
net investment in securitized finance receivables and the cash flow related
to
those net investments at June 30, 2006.
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Fair
Value Assumptions
|
||||
Loan
type
|
Weighted-average
prepayment speeds
|
Annual
Losses
|
Weighted-Average
Discount
Rate
|
Projected
cash flow termination date
|
Cash
flows received in 2006
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family
mortgage loans
|
30%
CPR
|
0.2%
|
16%
|
Anticipated
final maturity 2024
|
$
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
mortgage loans
(2)
|
(3)
|
0.8%
|
16%
|
(4)
|
$
3,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the excess of the cash flows received on the collateral pledged over
the
cash flow requirements of the securitization financing
bond security.
|
(2)
|
Includes
loans pledged to three different securitization
trusts.
|
(3)
|
Assumed
CPR speeds generally are governed by underlying pool characteristics,
prepayment lock-out provisions, and yield maintenance provisions.
Loans
currently delinquent in excess of 30 days are assumed liquidated
in month
six.
|
(4)
|
Cash
flow termination dates are modeled based on the repayment dates of
the
loans or optional redemption dates of the underlying securitization
financing bonds.
|
The
following table presents the Net Basis of Investments of $91,526 at June 30,
2006 and $106,516 at December 31, 2005 included in the table above by their
rating classification. Investments in the unrated and non-investment grade
classification include primarily other loans which do not have a rating but
are
substantially seasoned and are performing loans. Securitization
over-collateralization generally includes the excess of the securitized finance
receivable collateral pledged over the bonds issued by the securitization
trust.
(amounts
in thousands)
|
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
47,692
|
$
|
45,235
|
|||
Investments:
|
|||||||
AAA
rated and agency MBS fixed income securities
|
23,550
|
36,223
|
|||||
AA
and A rated fixed income securities
|
4,996
|
6,480
|
|||||
Unrated
and non-investment grade
|
11,834
|
11,781
|
|||||
Securitization
over-collateralization
|
51,146
|
52,032
|
|||||
$
|
91,526
|
$
|
106,516
|
||||
16
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
(amounts
in thousands except per share information)
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
2,543
|
$
|
2,732
|
$
|
4,831
|
$
|
7,189
|
|||||
(Provision
for) recapture of loan losses
|
-
|
(664
|
)
|
119
|
(2,925
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
interest income after provision for losses
|
2,543
|
2,068
|
4,950
|
4,264
|
|||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
-
|
(1,586
|
)
|
-
|
(1,673
|
)
|
|||||||
Gain
on sale of investments, net
|
116
|
9,552
|
140
|
9,850
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(1,165
|
)
|
(1,398
|
)
|
(2,492
|
)
|
(2,890
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income
|
1,615
|
9,594
|
2,828
|
10,529
|
|||||||||
Preferred
stock charge
|
(1,003
|
)
|
(1,337
|
)
|
(2,039
|
)
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income to common shareholders
|
612
|
8,257
|
789
|
7,855
|
|||||||||
Net
income per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.68
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.54
|
$
|
0.06
|
$
|
0.59
|
|||||
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2005.
The
decrease in net income and net income per common share during the three months
ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 is primarily the
result of a
gain of
$8.2 million on the sale of securitized finance receivables and a gain of $1.4
million on the sale of four healthcare mezzanine loans, which were realized
during the three months ended June 30, 2005. The impact of those gains was
partially offset by a $1.6 million impairment taken in 2005 on the Company’s
investment in delinquent property tax receivable security. Gain on sale of
investments for the three months ended June 30, 2006 include the gain from
the
sale of equity securities during the period.
Net
interest income decreased from $2.7 million to $2.5 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 from the same period in 2005 primarily as a result of a
decline in average interest earning assets for the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, and an increasing cost of funds, offset in part by
an
increase in the average yield on interest earning assets. The decline in average
earning assets was primarily due to the sale of certain securitized finance
receivables during the second quarter of 2005 and unscheduled principal
collections on the Company’s securitized commercial mortgage loans. Net interest
income after provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30,
2006
increased to $2.5 million from $2.1 million for the same period for 2005. No
provision for loan losses were recognized during the three months ended June
30,
2006 compared to $0.7 million for the second quarter of 2005 due primarily
to
the Company not needing to make any additional provisions for its securitized
commercial loans during the quarter and decreased delinquencies in the Company's
non-pool insured securitized single family loans.
General
and administrative expense decreased to $1.2 million for the three-months ended
June 30, 2006 from $1.4 million for the same period in 2005. This decrease
was primarily the result of the reductions in expenses associated with the
Company's tax lien servicing operations and a decline in litigation related
expenses.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2005.
The
decrease in net income and net income per common share during the six months
ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 is primarily the
result of a
gain of
$8.2 million on the sale of securitized finance receivables and a gain of $1.4
million on the sale of four healthcare mezzanine loans were realized during
the
three months ended June 30, 2005, which was partially offset by a $1.7 million
impairment taken in 2005 on the Company’s investment in delinquent property tax
receivables.
Net
interest income decreased from $7.2 million to $4.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 from the same period in 2005 primarily as a result of a
decline in average interest earning assets. The decline in average interst
earning assets was primarily related to the sale of certain securitized finance
receivables during the second quarter of 2005 and unscheduled principal
collections on the Company securitized commercial mortgage loans. Net interest
income after provision for loan
17
losses
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased to $4.9 million from $4.3
million for the same period for 2005. Provision for loan losses decreased from
an expense of $2.9 million for the six months ended 2005 to a benefit of $0.1
million for the same period in 2006 due primarily to the Company not needing
to
make any additional provisions for its securitized commercial loans during
the
quarter and decreased delinquencies in the Company's non-pool insured
securitized single family loans.
General
and administrative expense decreased to $2.5 million for the six-months ended
June 30, 2006 from $2.9 million for the same period in 2005. This decrease
was primarily the result of the reductions in expenses associated with the
Company's tax lien servicing operations and a decline in litigation related
expenses.
The
following table summarizes the average balances of interest-earning assets
and
their average effective yields, along with the average interest-bearing
liabilities and the related average effective interest rates, for each of the
periods presented.
Assets
that are on non-accrual status are excluded from the table below for each period
presented.
Average
Balances and Effective Interest Rates
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Effective
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets(1):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized
finance receivables(2)
(3)
|
$
|
684,483
|
7.61
|
%
|
$
|
945,090
|
7.16
|
%
|
$
|
700,873
|
7.65
|
%
|
$
|
1,085,971
|
7.17
|
%
|
|||||||||
Cash
|
38,353
|
4.83
|
%
|
35,841
|
2.56
|
%
|
27,703
|
4.98
|
%
|
44,489
|
2.38
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Securities
|
16,365
|
9.68
|
%
|
71,854
|
5.02
|
%
|
25,938
|
7.23
|
%
|
72,614
|
5.33
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Other
loans
|
4,909
|
13.33
|
%
|
6,486
|
12.90
|
%
|
5,046
|
10.71
|
%
|
6,789
|
13.75
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Other
investments
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
4,756
|
19.35
|
%
|
-
|
-
|
%
|
6,075
|
19.83
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
$
|
744,110
|
7.55
|
%
|
$
|
1,064,027
|
6.95
|
%
|
$
|
759,560
|
7.56
|
%
|
$
|
1,215,938
|
6.98
|
%
|
|||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse
securitization financing(3)
|
$
|
491,666
|
8.13
|
%
|
$
|
731,625
|
7.73
|
%
|
$
|
499,530
|
8.31
|
%
|
$
|
939,569
|
6.97
|
%
|
|||||||||
Repurchase
agreements secured by securitization financing
|
118,025
|
5.11
|
%
|
123,581
|
3.12
|
%
|
123,085
|
4.92
|
%
|
61,790
|
3.20
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
123
|
5.24
|
%
|
57,177
|
3.02
|
%
|
158
|
4.96
|
%
|
63,197
|
2.80
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
$
|
609,813
|
7.54
|
%
|
$
|
912,383
|
6.81
|
%
|
$
|
622,773
|
7.64
|
%
|
$
|
1,064,556
|
6.50
|
%
|
|||||||||
Net
interest spread on all investments(3)
|
0.01
|
%
|
0.14
|
%
|
(0.08
|
)%
|
0.48
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
yield on average interest-earning assets(3)
(4)
|
1.38
|
%
|
1.10
|
%
|
1.30
|
%
|
1.29
|
%
|
(1)
|
Average
balances exclude adjustments made in accordance with Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, “Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” to record available-for-sale
securities at fair value.
|
(2)
|
Average
balances exclude funds held by trustees of $7,473 and $251 for
the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $7,045 and
$242 for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
(3)
|
Effective
rates are calculated excluding non-interest related securitization
financing expenses. If included, the effective rate on interest-bearing
liabilities would be 7.64% and 6.93% for the three months ended
June 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively, and 7.75% and 6.65% for the six months
ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
(4)
|
Net
yield on average interest-earning assets reflects net interest
income
excluding non-interest related securitization financing expenses
divided
by average interest earning assets for the period,
annualized.
|
18
The
net
interest spread decreased 13 basis points, to 0.01% for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 from 0.14% for the same period in 2005. The net yield on average
interest earning assets for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased
to
1.38% from 1.10% for the same period in 2005 . The decline in the Company's
net
interest spread can be attributed primarily to an increase of 73 basis points
in
the effective rate on interest-bearing liabilities and an increase of 60 basis
points in the effective rate on interest-earning assets, which are both
principally a result of the sale of approximately $367.2 million of securitized
finance receivables and the extinguishment of approximately $363.9 million
of
the related securitization financing bonds. The net yield on average interest
earning assets in 2005 also includes interest income on the Company’s investment
in delinquent property tax receivable securities for most of the quarter in
2005, but none in 2006, because the investment was placed on non-accrual at
the
end of May 2005.
The
net
interest spread decreased 56 basis points, to negative 0.08% for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 from 0.48% for the same period in 2005. The net yield on
average interest earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased
relative to the same period in 2005, to 1.30% from 1.29%. The decline in the
Company's net interest spread can be attributed primarily to an increase of
114
basis points in the effective rate on interest-bearing liabilities, partially
offset by an increase of 58 basis points in the effective rate on
interest-earning assets. Amounts for 2005 in the above table include income
recognized through May 2005 on the Company’s delinquent property tax receivables
portfolio, which were placed on non-accrual at the end of May 2005. The
effective rate on interest-earning assets was also negatiely impacted as a
result of certain impaired securitized commercial loans being on non-accrual
during the six months ended June 30, 2006, which decreased interest income
for
the six months ended 2006 by approximately $1.0 million from the amount that
was
recognized on those loans for the same period in 2005. There were also effective
interest rate adjustments recorded in 2005 resulting in a decrease of $1.0
million from 2005.
The
following table summarizes the amount of change in interest income and interest
expense due to changes in interest rates versus changes in volume:
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2006 vs. 2005
|
||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Rate
|
Volume
|
Total
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Securitized
finance receivables
|
$
|
1,
043
|
$
|
(4,913
|
)
|
$
|
(3,870
|
)
|
||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
162
|
72
|
234
|
|||||||
Securities
|
508
|
(1,014
|
)
|
(506
|
)
|
|||||
Other
loans
|
7
|
(52
|
)
|
(45
|
)
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
(115
|
)
|
(115
|
)
|
(230
|
)
|
||||
Total
interest income
|
1,605
|
(6,022
|
)
|
(4,417
|
)
|
|||||
Securitization
financing
|
965
|
(4,582
|
)
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
222
|
(656
|
)
|
(434
|
)
|
|||||
Total
interest expense
|
1,187
|
(5,238
|
)
|
(4,051
|
)
|
|||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
418
|
$
|
(784
|
)
|
$
|
366
|
19
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006 vs. 2005
|
||||||||||
(amounts
in thousands)
|
Rate
|
Volume
|
Total
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
Securitized
finance receivables
|
$
|
2,555
|
$
|
(14,628
|
)
|
$
|
(12,073
|
)
|
||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
26
|
135
|
161
|
|||||||
Securities
|
601
|
(1,599
|
)
|
(998
|
)
|
|||||
Other
loans
|
(91
|
)
|
(106
|
)
|
(197
|
)
|
||||
Other
investments
|
(301
|
)
|
(301
|
)
|
(602
|
)
|
||||
Total
interest income
|
2,790
|
(16,499
|
)
|
(13,709
|
)
|
|||||
Securitization
financing
|
4,084
|
(14,028
|
)
|
(9,944
|
)
|
|||||
Repurchase
agreements
|
375
|
(1,261
|
)
|
(886
|
)
|
|||||
Total
interest expense
|
4,459
|
(15,289
|
)
|
(10,830
|
)
|
|||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
(1,669
|
)
|
$
|
(1,210
|
)
|
$
|
(2,879
|
)
|
Note: The
change in interest income and interest expense due to changes in both volume
and
rate, which cannot be segregated, has been allocated proportionately to the
change due to volume and the change due to rate. This table excludes
non-interest related dividends on equity securities, securitization financing
expense, other interest expense and provision for credit
losses.
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period for 2006, average
interest-earning assets declined $456 million, or approximately 38%.
Approximately 56% of that decline resulted from the derecognition of two
securitization trusts collateralized by manufactured housing loans. Another
large portion of such reduction relates to paydowns on the Company's
adjustable-rate single-family mortgages.
Credit
Exposures.
The
predominate securitization structure used by Dynex is non-recourse
securitization financing, whereby loans and securities are pledged to a trust,
and the trust issues bonds pursuant to an indenture. Generally these
securitization structures use over-collateralization, subordination, third-party
guarantees, reserve funds, bond insurance, mortgage pool insurance or any
combination of the foregoing as a form of credit enhancement. From an economic
point of view, we generally have retained a limited portion of the direct credit
risk in these securities. In many instances, we retained the “first-loss” credit
risk on pools of loans that it has securitized.
The
following table summarizes the aggregate principal amount of certain or our
investments; the direct credit exposure we have retained (represented by the
amount of over-collateralization pledged and subordinated securities we own),
net of the credit reserves, premiums and discounts we maintain for such
exposure; and the actual credit losses incurred for each quarter presented.
Credit Exposure, Net of Credit Reserves is based on the credit risk retained
by
the Company for the loans and securities pledged to the securitization trust,
from an economic point of view. The table includes any subordinated security
retained by the Company if such subordinated security is rated below investment
grade by one or more of the nationally recognized credit rating agencies. Credit
Exposure, Net of Credit Reserves increased from the second quarter 2005 by
$4.1
million and from the fourth quarter of 2005 by $2.1 million as the Company
has
amortized premiums on bonds issued and sold by the Company, which had previously
been allocated for credit reserves. The actual credit loss in the second quarter
of 2006 relates to a $7.8 million securitized commercial mortgage loan which
was
liquidated during the period.
The
table
excludes other forms of credit enhancement from which the Company benefits,
and
based upon the performance of the underlying loans, may provide additional
protection against losses. These additional protections include loss
reimbursement guarantees with a remaining balance of $18.7 million and a
remaining deductible aggregating $0.5 million on $17.6 million of securitized
single-family mortgage loans which are subject to such reimbursement agreements;
guarantees
20
aggregating
$16.7 million on $162.2 million of securitized commercial mortgage loans,
whereby losses on such loans would need to exceed the respective guarantee
amount before the Company would incur credit losses; and $41.0 million of
securitized single-family mortgage loans which are subject to various mortgage
pool insurance policies whereby losses would need to exceed the remaining stop
loss of at least 93% on such policies before the Company would incur
losses.
Credit
Reserves and Actual Credit Losses
(amounts
in millions)
|
Outstanding
Loan Principal Balance
|
Credit
Exposure, Net
Of
Credit Reserves
|
Actual
Credit
Losses
|
Credit
Exposure, Net to Outstanding Loan Balance
|
|||||||||
2005,
Quarter 2
|
$
|
828.9
|
$
|
29.0
|
$
|
0.5
|
3.50
|
%
|
|||||
2005,
Quarter 3
|
786.5
|
29.3
|
0.3
|
3.73
|
%
|
||||||||
2005,
Quarter 4
|
753.2
|
31.0
|
0.0
|
4.12
|
%
|
||||||||
2006,
Quarter 1
|
724.4
|
32.0
|
0.5
|
4.42
|
%
|
||||||||
2006,
Quarter 2
|
693.8
|
33.1
|
7.1
|
4.77
|
%
|
The
following tables summarize single-family mortgage loan and commercial mortgage
loan delinquencies as a percentage of the outstanding commercial securitized
finance receivables balance for those securities in which we have retained
a
portion of the direct credit risk. The delinquencies as a percentage of all
outstanding securitized finance receivables balance have decreased to 6.7%
at
June 30, 2006 from 7.3% at June 30, 2005 primarily as a result of prepayment
of
one previously delinquent commercial mortgage loan and the liquidation of
another at a $6.8 million loss, which was fully reserved. We monitor and
evaluate our exposure to credit losses and have established reserves based
upon
anticipated losses, general economic conditions and trends in the investment
portfolio. At June 30, 2006, management believes the level of credit reserves
is
appropriate for currently existing losses within these loan pools.
Single
family mortgage loan delinquencies as a percentage of the outstanding loan
balance increased by approximately 1.04% to 8.28% at June 30, 2006 from 7.24%
at
June 30, 2005 and increased by 0.87% from 7.41% at December 31, 2005 as the
unpaid principal balance of the portfolio declines. The following table provides
the percentage of delinquent single family loans.
Single-Family
Loan Delinquency Statistics
30
to 59 days delinquent
|
60
to 89 days delinquent
|
90
days and over delinquent
(1)
|
Total
|
|
2005,
Quarter 2
|
4.09%
|
0.69%
|
2.46%
|
7.24%
|
2005,
Quarter 3
|
3.33%
|
1.43%
|
2.24%
|
7.00%
|
2005,
Quarter 4
|
4.23%
|
0.61%
|
2.57%
|
7.41%
|
2006,
Quarter 1
|
4.50%
|
0.85%
|
2.90%
|
8.25%
|
2006,
Quarter 2
|
4.51%
|
1.09%
|
2.68%
|
8.28%
|
21
For
commercial mortgage loans, the delinquencies as a percentage of the outstanding
securitized finance receivables balance have decreased to 6.24% at June 30,
2006
from 6.90% at December 31, 2005, and from 7.33% at June 30, 2005, primarily
due
to a commercial loan with an unpaid principal balance of $7.8 million which
was
liquidated with a $6.8 million loss during the quarter.
Commercial
Loan Delinquency Statistics
30
to 59 days delinquent
|
60
to 89 days delinquent
|
90
days and over delinquent(1)
|
Total
|
|
2005,
Quarter 2
|
0.84%
|
0.71%
|
5.78%
|
7.33%
|
2005,
Quarter 3
|
-%
|
1.50%
|
6.54%
|
8.04%
|
2005,
Quarter 4
|
-%
|
0.25%
|
6.65%
|
6.90%
|
2006,
Quarter 1
|
1.25%
|
-%
|
6.38%
|
7.63%
|
2006,
Quarter 2
|
1.09%
|
-%
|
5.15%
|
6.24%
|
(1) Includes
foreclosures, repossessions and real estate owned.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
late
2005, the FASB's staff issued Staff Position (FSP) 115-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments.
This
FSP provides additional guidance on when an investment in a debt or equity
security should be considered impaired and when that impairment should be
considered other-than-temporary and recognized as a loss. Additionally, the
FSP
requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses which have not been
recognized as other-than-temporary. This guidance did not have a material effect
on the Company's consolidated financial statements upon implementation on
January 1, 2006.
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments”. Key provisions of SFAS 155 include: (1) a broad
fair value measurement option for certain hybrid financial instruments that
contain an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation;
(2) clarification that only the simplest separations of interest payments
and principal payments qualify for the exception afforded to interest-only
strips and principal-only strips from derivative accounting under paragraph
14
of FAS 133 (thereby narrowing such exception); (3) a requirement that
beneficial interests in securitized financial assets be analyzed to determine
whether they are freestanding derivatives or whether they are hybrid instruments
that contain embedded derivatives requiring bifurcation; (4) clarification
that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives; and (5) elimination of the prohibition on a QSPE holding
passive derivative financial instruments that pertain to beneficial interests
that are or contain a derivative financial instrument. In general, these changes
will reduce the operational complexity associated with bifurcating embedded
derivatives, and increase the number of beneficial interests in securitization
transactions, including interest-only strips and principal-only strips, required
to be accounted for in accordance with FAS 133. Management does not believe
that
SFAS 155 will have a material effect on the financial statements of the
Company.
In
March
2006 the FASB issued SFAS No.156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets--an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (SFAS 156). This Statement
amends FASB Statement No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities,
with
respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities. This Statement requires an entity to recognize a
servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation
to
service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain
situations and to initially measure those servicing assets and servicing
liabilities at fair value, if practicable. SFAS 156 permits an entity to measure
each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities
by either amortizing the servicing asset or liability and assessing the mortgage
servicing asset or servicing liability for impairment at each reporting date.
Alternatively, an entity may choose to measure the servicing asset or servicing
liability at fair value at each reporting date and report changes in fair value
in earnings in the period the changes occur. SFAS 156 permits, at its initial
adoption, a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to
trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights, without calling
into question the treatment of other available-for-sale securities under
Statement 115, provided that the available-for-sale securities are identified
in
some manner as offsetting the entity's exposure to changes in fair value of
servicing assets or servicing liabilities
22
that
a
servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value. This statement is
effective as of the beginning of its first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact
this statement may have on its financial statements.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The
Company has historically financed its operations from a variety of sources.
The
Company’s primary source of funding its operations today is the cash flow
generated from the investment portfolio, which includes net interest income
and
principal payments and prepayments on these investments. From the cash flow
on
its investment portfolio, the Company funds its operating overhead costs,
including the servicing of its delinquent property tax receivables, pays
the
dividend on the Series D Preferred Stock and services any
remaining recourse debt. The
Company’s investment portfolio continues to provide positive cash flow, which
can be utilized for reinvestment purposes.
Cash
flow
from the investment portfolio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
was approximately $10.2 million and $22.6 million, respectively, which includes
approximately $6.9 million and $14.6 million, respectively, in principal
payments on securities, including $500 thousand and $1.1 million, respectively,
on the property tax receivable security. Such cash flow is after payment of
principal and interest on the associated non-recourse securitization financing
outstanding.
Excluding
any cash flow derived from the sale or re-securitization of assets, and assuming
that short-term interest rates remain stable, the Company anticipates that
the
cash flow from its investment portfolio will sequentially decline in 2006 as
the
investment portfolio continues to pay down, absent meaningful reinvestment
of
capital. The Company anticipates, however, that it will have sufficient cash
flow from the investment portfolio to meet all of its current obligations on
both a short-term and long-term basis.
During
the second quarter 2006, the Company utilized available capital to purchase
$0.6
million in equity securities of other publicly-traded mortgage REITs, and
additional short-term investments. At June 30, 2006, the Company had unused
capacity on uncommitted repurchase agreement lines of approximately $13.0
million and cash and equivalents of $47.7 million, and other short-term
instruments of $24.9 million. Cash flow from the investment portfolio is subject
to fluctuation due to changes in interest rates, repayment rates and default
rates and related losses.
The
Company intends to maintain high levels of liquidity for the foreseeable future
given the lack of compelling reinvestment opportunities as a result of the
low
level of interest rates, the flat yield curve, and the historically tight
spreads on fixed income instruments. The Board of Directors of Dynex also
approved the redemption of up to one million shares of common stock of Dynex,
and through June 30, 2006, the Company had purchased 32,560 such shares at
an
average effective price of $6.75. The repurchase of shares of common stock
is
likely to continue if alternative uses of the capital are not available and
if
such repurchases are accretive to book value per common share.
The
Company currently utilizes a combination of equity, securitization financing
and
repurchase agreement financing to finance its investment portfolio.
Securitization financing is recourse only to the assets pledged as collateral
to
support the financing and is not otherwise recourse to the Company. The maturity
of each class of securitization financing is directly affected by the rate
of
principal prepayments on the related collateral and is not subject to margin
call risk. Each series is also subject to redemption according to specific
terms
of the respective indentures, generally on the earlier of a specified date
or
when the remaining balance of the bonds equals 35% or less of the original
principal balance of the bonds. At June 30, 2006, the Company had $483.4 million
of non-recourse securitization financing outstanding, all of which carries
a
fixed rate of interest.
Repurchase
agreement financing is recourse to the assets pledged, and to the Company.
Repurchase agreement financing is not committed financing to the Company, and
it
generally renews or rolls every 30-days. The amounts advanced to the Company
by
the repurchase agreement counterparty are determined largely based on the fair
value of the asset pledged to the counterparty.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
written statements in this Form 10-Q made by the Company that are not historical
fact constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements contained in this Item as
well
as those discussed elsewhere in this Report
23
addressing
the results of operations, our operating performance, events, or developments
that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, including statements
relating to investment strategies, net interest income growth, earnings or
earnings per share growth, and market share, as well as statements expressing
optimism or pessimism about future operating results, are forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements are based upon management’s views and
assumptions as of the date of this report, regarding future events and operating
performance and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements. Such
forward-looking statements may involve factors that could cause the actual
results of the Company to differ materially from historical results or from
any
results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company
cautions the public not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements,
which may be based on assumptions and anticipated events that do not
materialize.
Factors
that may cause actual results to differ from historical results or from any
results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include the
following:
Reinvestment. Asset
yields today are generally lower than those assets sold or repaid, due to lower
overall interest rates and more competition for these assets. We have generally
been unable to find investments which have acceptable risk adjusted yields.
As a
result, our net interest income has been declining, and may continue to decline
in the future, resulting in lower earnings per share over time. In order to
maintain our investment portfolio size and our earnings, we need to reinvest
a
portion of the cash flows we receive into new interesting earning assets. If
we
are unable to find suitable reinvestment opportunities, the net interest income
on our investment portfolio and investment cash flows could be negatively
impacted.
Economic
Conditions.
We are
affected by general economic conditions. An increase in the risk of defaults
and
credit risk resulting from an economic slowdown or recession or other factors
could result in a decrease in the value of our investments and the
over-collateralization associated with our securitization transactions. As
a
result of our being heavily invested in short-term high quality investments;
however, a worsening economy may potentially benefit the Company by creating
opportunities for us to invest in assets that become distressed as a result
of
these worsening conditions. These
changes could have an effect on our financial performance and the performance
on
our securitized loan pools.
Investment
Portfolio Cash Flow.
Cash
flows from the investment portfolio fund our operations,
the
preferred stock dividend, and
repayments of outstanding debt, and are subject to fluctuation due to changes
in
interest rates, repayment rates and default rates and related losses,
particularly given the high degree of internal structural leverage inherent
in
our securitized investments.
Cash
flows from the investment portfolio are likely to sequentially decline until
we
meaningfully begin to reinvest our capital. There can be no assurances that
the
Company will be able to find suitable investment alternatives for its capital,
nor can there be assurances that the Company will meet its reinvestment and
return hurdles.
Defaults.
Defaults
by borrowers on loans we securitized may have an adverse impact on our financial
performance, if actual credit losses differ materially from our estimates or
exceed reserves for losses recorded in the financial statements. The allowance
for loan losses is calculated on the basis of historical experience and
management’s best estimates. Actual default rates or loss severity may differ
from our estimate as a result of economic conditions. Actual defaults on
adjustable-rate mortgage loans may increase during a rising interest rate
environment. In addition, commercial mortgage loans are generally large dollar
balance loans, and a significant loan default may have an adverse impact on
the
Company’s financial results. Such
impact may include higher provisions for loan losses and reduced interest income
if the loan is placed on non-accrual.
Interest
Rate Fluctuations.
Our
income and cash flow depends on our ability to earn greater interest on our
investments than the interest cost to finance these investments. Interest rates
in the markets served by us generally rise or fall with interest rates as a
whole. Approximately $574 million of our investments, including loans and
securities currently pledged as securitized finance receivables and securities,
are fixed-rate and approximately $120 million of our investments are variable
rate. We currently finance these fixed-rate assets through $487 million of
fixed
rate securitization financing and $114 million of variable rate repurchase
agreements. The net interest spread for these investments could decrease during
a period of rapidly rising short-term interest rates, since the investments
generally have interest rates which reset on a delayed basis and have periodic
interest rate caps; the related borrowing has no delayed resets or such interest
rate caps.
Third-party
Servicers. Our
loans
and loans underlying securities are serviced by third-party service providers.
As with any external service provider, we are subject to the risks associated
with inadequate or untimely services. Many borrowers require notices and
reminders to keep their loans current and to prevent delinquencies and
foreclosures. A substantial increase in our delinquency rate that results from
improper servicing or loan performance in general could harm our ability to
securitize our real estate loans in the future and may have an adverse effect
on
our earnings.
24
Prepayments.
Prepayments by borrowers on loans securitized by the Company may have an adverse
impact on our financial performance. Prepayments are expected to increase during
a declining interest rate or flat yield curve environment. Our exposure to
rapid
prepayments is primarily (i) the faster amortization of premium on the
investments and, to the extent applicable, amortization of bond discount, and
(ii) the replacement of investments in our portfolio with lower yielding
investments.
Competition.
The
financial services industry is a highly competitive market in which we compete
with a number of institutions with greater financial resources. In purchasing
portfolio investments and in issuing securities, we compete with other mortgage
REITs, investment banking firms, savings and loan associations, commercial
banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, federal agencies and other
entities, many of which have greater financial resources and a lower cost of
capital than we do. Increased competition in the market and our competitors
greater financial resources have adversely affected the Company, and may
continue to do so. Competition may also continue to keep pressure on spreads
resulting in the Company being unable to reinvest its capital at a satisfactory
risk-adjusted basis.
Regulatory
Changes.
Our
businesses as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were not subject
to
any material federal or state regulation or licensing requirements. However,
changes in existing laws and regulations or in the interpretation thereof,
or
the introduction of new laws and regulations, could adversely affect us and
the
performance of our securitized loan pools or its ability to collect on its
delinquent property tax receivables. We are a REIT and are required to meet
certain tests in order to maintain our REIT status as described in the
discussion of “Federal Income Tax Considerations” in its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. If we should fail to maintain our
REIT status, we would not be able to hold certain investments and would be
subject to income taxes.
Other.
The
following risks, which are discussed in more detail in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, could also affect
our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows:
· |
We
may be unable to invest in new assets with attractive yields, and
yields
on new assets in which we do invest may not generate attractive yields,
resulting in a decline in our earnings per share over
time.
|
· |
Our
ownership of certain subordinate interests in securitization trusts
subjects us to credit risk on the underlying loans, and we provide
for
loss reserves on these loans as required under GAAP.
|
· |
Certain
investments employ internal structural leverage as a result of the
securitization process, and are in the most subordinate position
in the
capital structure, which magnifies the potential impact of adverse
events
on our cash flows and reported results.
|
· |
Our
efforts to manage credit risk may not be successful in limiting
delinquencies and defaults in underlying loans or losses on our
investments.
|
· |
Prepayments
of principal on our investments, and the timing of prepayments, may
impact
our reported earnings and our cash
flows.
|
· |
We
finance a portion of our investment portfolio with short-term recourse
repurchase agreements which subjects us to margin calls if the assets
pledged subsequently decline in
value.
|
· |
We
may be subject to the risks associated with inadequate or untimely
services from third-party service providers, which may harm our results
of
operations.
|
· |
Interest
rate fluctuations can have various negative effects on us, and could
lead
to reduced earnings and/or increased earnings
volatility.
|
· |
Our
reported income depends on accounting conventions and assumptions
about
the future that may change.
|
25
· |
Failure
to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our dividend distributions
and
could adversely affect the value of our
securities.
|
· |
Maintaining
REIT status may reduce our flexibility to manage our
operations.
|
· |
We
may fail to properly conduct our operations so as to avoid falling
under
the definition of an investment company pursuant to the Investment
Company
Act of 1940.
|
· |
We
are dependent on certain key personnel.
|
Market
risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential
change in the value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in interest
and foreign exchange rates and in equity and commodity prices. Market risk
is
inherent to both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments, and
accordingly, the scope of our market risk management extends beyond derivatives
to include all market risk sensitive financial instruments. As a financial
services company, net interest margin comprises the primary component of the
Company’s earnings and cash flows. The Company is subject to risk resulting from
interest rate fluctuations to the extent that there is a gap between the amount
of the Company’s interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing
liabilities that are prepaid, mature or re-price within specified periods.
The
Company monitors the aggregate cash flow, projected net yield and estimated
market value of its investment portfolio under various interest rate and
prepayment assumptions. While certain investments may perform poorly in an
increasing or decreasing interest rate environment, other investments may
perform well, and others may not be impacted at all.
The
Company focuses on the sensitivity of its investment
portfolio cash
flow, and measures such sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Changes in
interest rates are defined as instantaneous, parallel, and sustained interest
rate movements in 100 basis point increments. The Company estimates its interest
income cash flow for the next twenty-four months assuming interest rates
over
such
time period follow
the forward LIBOR curve (based on 90-day Eurodollar futures contracts) as of
June 30, 2006. Once the base case has been estimated, cash flows are projected
for each of the defined interest rate scenarios. Those scenario results are then
compared against the base case to determine the estimated change to cash flow.
Cash
flow
changes from interest rate swaps, caps, floors or any other derivative
instrument are included in this analysis.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s net interest income cash flow
and
market value sensitivity
analyses at June 30, 2006. These analyses represent management’s estimate of the
percentage change in net interest margin cash flow and
value
expressed as a percentage change of shareholders' equity,
given a
shift in interest rates, as discussed above. Certain investments, with a
carrying value of $3.5 million at June 30, 2006 are not considered to be
interest rate sensitive and are excluded from the analysis below. The “Base”
case represents the interest rate environment as it existed as of June 30,
2006.
At June 30, 2006, one-month LIBOR was 5.33% and six-month LIBOR was 5.59%.
The
base case net interest margin cash flow is $15.8 million, excluding net interest
margin on cash and cash equivalents, and $20.5 million, including net interest
margin on cash and cash equivalents. The analysis is heavily dependent upon
the
assumptions used in the model. The effect of changes in future interest rates,
the shape of the yield curve or the mix of assets and liabilities may cause
actual results to differ significantly from the modeled results. In addition,
certain financial instruments provide a degree of “optionality.” The most
significant option affecting our portfolio is the borrowers’ option to prepay
the loans. The model applies prepayment rate assumptions representing
management’s estimate of prepayment activity on a projected basis for each
collateral pool in the investment portfolio. The model applies the same
prepayment rate assumptions for all five cases indicated below. The extent
to
which borrowers utilize the ability to exercise their option may cause actual
results to significantly differ from the analysis. Furthermore, the projected
results assume no additions or subtractions to our portfolio, and no change
to
Dynex’s liability structure. Historically, there have been significant changes
in the Company’s investment
portfolio and the liabilities incurred by the Company. As a result of
anticipated prepayments on assets in the investment portfolio, there are
likely
to be such changes in the future.
26
Projected
Change in Net Interest Margin Cash Flow From Base Case
|
||||||
Basis
Point Increase (Decrease) in Interest Rates
|
Excluding
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
Including
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
Projected
Change in Value, Expressed as a Percentage of Shareholders’
Equity
|
|||
+200
|
(9.2)%
|
2.1%
|
(0.9)%
|
|||
+100
|
(3.5)%
|
1.9%
|
(0.3)%
|
|||
Base
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
-100
|
0.9%
|
(4.0)%
|
0.1%
|
|||
-200
|
1.5%
|
(8.1)%
|
0.1%
|
The
Company’s interest rate rise is related both to the rate of change in short-term
interest rates and to the level of short-term interest rates. Approximately
$574
million of Dynex’s investment portfolio as of June 30, 2006 is comprised of
loans or securities that have coupon rates that are fixed. Approximately
$120 million of its investment portfolio as of June 30, 2006 was comprised
of
loans or securities that have coupon rates which adjust over time (subject
to
certain periodic and lifetime limitations) in conjunction with changes
in
short-term interest rates. Approximately 67%, 12% and 10% of the adjustable-rate
loans underlying our securitized finance receivables are indexed to and
reset
based upon the level of six-month LIBOR, one-year constant maturity treasury
rate (CMT) and prime rate, respectively.
Generally,
during a period of rising short-term interest rates, our net interest income
earned and
the
corresponding cash flow on
our
investment portfolio will decrease. The decrease of the net interest spread
results from (i) fixed-rate
loans and investments financed with variable-rate debt, (ii) the
lag
in resets of the adjustable rate loans underlying the adjustable rate securities
and securitized finance receivables relative to the rate resets on the
associated borrowings and (iii) rate resets on the adjustable rate loans which
are generally limited to 1% every six months or 2% every twelve months and
subject to lifetime caps, while the associated borrowings have no such
limitation. As to item (i), the Company has substantially limited its interest
rate risk by
match
funding fixed rate assets and variable rate assets.
As to
item (ii) and (iii), as short-term interest rates stabilize and the adjustable-rate
loans
reset, the net interest margin may be partially restored as the yields on the
adjustable-rate
loans
adjust to market conditions.
Net
interest income may increase following a fall in short-term interest rates.
This
increase may be temporary as the yields on the adjustable-rate loans adjust
to
the new market conditions after a lag period. The net interest spread may also
be increased or decreased by the proceeds or costs of interest rate swap, cap
or
floor agreements, to the extent that Dynex has entered into such
agreements.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
(a) Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed
or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the
Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to management, including the Company’s management, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As
of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. This
evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation
of
the Company’s management, including the Company’s Principal Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s
management concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
In
conducting its review of disclosure controls, management concluded that
sufficient disclosure controls and procedures did exist to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
27
(b) Changes
in internal controls.
The
Company’s management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in
the
Company’s internal controls or in other factors during the quarter covered by
this report that could materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect the Company’s internal controls subsequent to the evaluation date, nor
any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in such internal controls
requiring corrective actions.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
As
discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries are defendants
in
litigation. The following discussion is the current status of the
litigation.
GLS
Capital, Inc. (“GLS”), a subsidiary of the Company, and the County of Allegheny,
Pennsylvania (“Allegheny County”), are defendants in a lawsuit in the Court of
Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the “Court”). Plaintiffs
allege that GLS illegally charged the taxpayers of Allegheny County certain
attorney fees, costs and expenses, and interest in the collection of delinquent
property tax receivables owned by GLS. Plaintiffs are seeking class action
status. During 2005, the Court held hearings in this matter, and has not
yet ruled on whether it will grant class action status in the litigation.
Plaintiffs have not enumerated its damages in this matter. The Company
believes that the ultimate outcome of this litigation will not have a material
impact on its financial condition, but may have a material impact on reported
results for the particular period presented.
The
Company and Dynex Commercial, Inc. (“DCI”), formerly an affiliate of the Company
and now known as DCI Commercial, Inc., are appellees (or “respondents”) in the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Judicial District of Texas at Dallas, related
to
the matter of Basic Capital Management et al (collectively, “BCM” or “the
Plaintiffs”) versus Dynex Commercial, Inc. et al. Plaintiff’s appeal seeks to
overturn a judgment in favor of the Company and DCI which denied recovery to
Plaintiffs, and to have a judgment entered in favor of Plaintiffs based on
a
jury award for damages against the Company of $253, and against DCI for $2,200
or $25,600, all of which was set aside by the trial court. In the
alternative, Plaintiffs are seeking a new trial. The Court of Appeals heard
the
oral argument on the matter on April 18, 2006 but have not yet issued a ruling
on the appeal.
On
February 11, 2005, a putative class action complaint alleging violations of
the
federal securities laws and various state common law claims was filed against
Dynex Capital, Inc., our subsidiary MERIT Securities Corporation, Stephen J.
Benedetti, the Company's Executive Vice President, and Thomas H. Potts, the
Company's former President and a former Director, in United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York ("District Court") by the Teamsters
Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund ("Teamsters"). The lawsuit
purported to be a class action on behalf of purchasers of MERIT Series 13
securitization financing bonds, which are collateralized by manufactured housing
loans. On May 31, 2005, the Teamsters filed an amended class action
complaint. The amended complaint dropped all state common law claims but
added federal securities claims related to the MERIT Series 12 securitization
financing bonds. On July 15, 2005, the defendants moved to
dismiss the amended complaint. On February 10, 2006, the District Court
dismissed the claims against Messrs. Benedetti and Potts, but did not dismiss
the claims against Dynex and MERIT. On February 24, 2006, Dynex
and MERIT moved for reconsideration and interlocutory appeal of the District
Court's order denying the motion to dismiss Dynex and MERIT. The
Company has evaluated the allegations and believes them to be without merit
and
intends to continue to vigorously defend itself against them.
Although
no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the above
litigation, the Company believes the resolution of these lawsuits will not
have
a material effect on our consolidated balance sheet but could materially affect
our consolidated results of operations in a given year.
There
have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A - Risk
Factors of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”). The materialization of any risks and
uncertainties
28
identified
in the Company's Forward Looking Statements contained herein together with
those
previously disclosed in the Form 10-K or those that are presently unforeseen
could result in significant adverse effects on the Company's financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. See Item 2. “Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Forward Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
On
November 15, 2005, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a common stock
repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to one million shares
of its common stock. Subject to the applicable securities laws and the terms
of
the Series D Preferred Stock designation, future repurchases of common stock
will be made at times and in amounts as the Company deems appropriate and may
be
suspended or discontinued at any time. The following table provides common
stock
repurchases made by or on behalf of the Company during the six months ended
June
30, 2006.
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or
Program
|
Maximum
Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased under the Plan or
Program
|
|
Beginning
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
|
April
1, 2006
|
April
30, 2006
|
2,500
|
$
6.73
|
2,500
|
977,200
|
May
1, 2006
|
May
31, 2006
|
1,200
|
$
6.84
|
1,200
|
976,000
|
June
1, 2006
|
June
30, 2006
|
8,560
|
$
6.82
|
8,560
|
967,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,560
|
$
6.75
|
32,560
|
967,440
|
None
On
June
15, 2006, the Annual Meeting of shareholders was held to elect the members
of
the Board of Directors. The following table summarizes the results of those
votes.
Director |
For
|
Withheld
|
||
Common
Share Votes
|
||||
Thomas
B. Akin
|
11,773,158
|
101,944
|
||
Daniel
K. Osborne
|
11,772,447
|
102,655
|
||
Eric
P. Von der Porten
|
11,771,217
|
103,885
|
||
Preferred
Share Votes
|
||||
Leon
A. Felman
|
3,921,539
|
1,900
|
||
Barry
Igdaloff
|
3,921,539
|
1,900
|
||
29
None
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
30
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
DYNEX
CAPITAL, INC.
|
|
Date:
August 14, 2006
|
/s/
Stephen J. Benedetti
|
Stephen
J. Benedetti
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
31
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|