E-Qure Corp. - Quarter Report: 2014 September (Form 10-Q)

Organizational Background: E-Qure Corp., ("EQUR" or the "Company") is a Delaware corporation with a mailing address in New York, NY and offices in Israel.

Basis of Presentation: The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs, and as such, has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of September 30, 2014, the cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its current business plan, and the Company had negative working capital. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: For financial statement presentation purposes, the Company considers those short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Property and Equipment: New property and equipment are recorded at cost. Property and equipment included in the bankruptcy proceedings and transferred to the Trustee had been valued at liquidation value. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 5 years. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Expenditures for minor items, repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Gain or loss upon sale or retirement due to obsolescence is reflected in the operating results in the period the event takes place.

Development Stage Enterprise: As of January 1, 2011, the Company re-entered the development stage. The financial statements have been updated to reflect this change as of this date.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets: We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets including equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. Our primary measure of fair value is based on discounted cash flows. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations.

Stock Based Compensation: Stock-based awards are accounted for using the fair value method in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments. Our primary type of share-based compensation consists of stock options. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model in valuing options. The inputs for the valuation analysis of the options include the market value of the Company's common stock, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock, the exercise price of the warrants and the risk free interest rate.

Accounting For Obligations And Instruments Potentially To Be Settled In The Company's Own Stock: We account for obligations and instruments potentially to be settled in the Company's stock in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments. This issue addresses the initial balance sheet classification and measurement of contracts that are indexed to, and potentially settled in, the Company's own stock.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: FASB ASC 825, "Financial Instruments," requires entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. FASB ASC 825 defines fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the carrying value of certain financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses.) approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments or interest rates, which are comparable with current rates.

Fair Value Measurements: The Company measures fair value under a framework that utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of inputs which prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value are:

- Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
- Level 2: Other inputs that are observable, directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities or market corroborated inputs.
- Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would value the assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques in its assessment that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The following table presents the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value, classified according to the three categories described above:

When the Company changes its valuation inputs for measuring financial assets and liabilities at fair value, either due to changes in current market conditions or other factors, it may need to transfer those assets or liabilities to another level in the hierarchy based on the new inputs used. The Company recognizes these transfers at the end of the reporting period that the transfers occur. For the fiscal periods ended September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no significant transfers of financial assets or financial liabilities between the hierarchy levels.

Earnings per Common Share: We compute net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earning per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. All per share disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the 1:100 reverse split had occurred January 1, 2011.

Income Taxes: We have adopted ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Pursuant to ASC 740, we are required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not to occur. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our generating sufficient taxable income in future years in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize benefit from the reversal of temporary differences and from net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all of our net deferred tax asset. Management will continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax asset and its related valuation allowance. If our assessment of the deferred tax assets or the corresponding valuation allowance were to change, we would record the related adjustment to income during the period in which we make the determination. Our tax rate may also vary based on our results and the mix of income or loss in domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions in which we operate.

In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we will reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We will record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

ASC 740 which requires recognition of estimated income taxes payable or refundable on income tax returns for the current year and for the estimated future tax effect attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards. Measurement of deferred income tax is based on enacted tax laws including tax rates, with the measurement of deferred income tax assets being reduced by available tax benefits not expected to be realized.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes" ("FIN No. 48") which was effective for the Company on January 1, 2007.  FIN No. 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under FIN No. 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements.

Our federal and state income tax returns are open for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2008. We are not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. At December 31, 2013, we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required under FIN 48.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

- Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

- Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Note 2. Stockholders' Equity

Common Stock-We are currently authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 shares of $0.00001 par value common stock. All issued shares of common stock are entitled to vote on a 1 share/1 vote basis. On May 12, 2014 the Board approved a 1 for 100 reverse split of the common stock. In conjunction with the reverse split the Company redomiclied from New Jersey to Delaware.

Recent Issuances of Common Stock in 2014:

During the period ended June 30, 2014 we received proceeds of $2,095,000 upon the sale of common stock and $500,000 in subscription receivable for the sale of shares at a subscription price of $0.40 per share to approximately 40 investors (resulting in 6,437,500 shares issuable, post-reverse) and are to be issued upon completion of a 1:100 reverse stock split. The shares were issued as part of a Private Placement of 10,000,000 shares. All such subscribed shares are restricted as to transferability. The contemplated reverse split of common stock is tied to the Company's plan to redomicile from New Jersey to Delaware. The 1:100 reverse split and redomicile became effective in August 2014. Also, 253,080 shares previously issued to former related parties were returned and cancelled.

We are obligated to issue 5,015,062 shares of our common stock valued at $9,196,023 in settlement of $113,501 in notes plus associated accrued interest of $25,672. The terms of three settlement agreements provided for an aggregate of $20,000 of additional funds to acquire all the shares of common stock included in the settlement. These are carried in the equity section of our balance sheet as "subscriptions receivable" until received. The conversions did not occur within the terms of the promissory notes, specifically because the notes provided for the adjustment of either: (i) the number of shares to be issued; or the conversion price, in the event of a share recapitalization. Neither adjustment was made and therefore a $9,036,850 loss was recognized.

We are also obligated to issue 7,391,600 shares of our common stock in settlement of $71,545 due to a related party plus associated accrued interest of $2,142. The conversions did not occur within the terms of the promissory notes, specifically because the notes provided for the adjustment of either: (i) the number of shares to be issued; or (ii) the conversion price, in the event of a share recapitalization. Neither adjustment was made and therefore a $14,672,493 loss was recognized.

The above-referenced conversions not in accordance within the terms of the promissory notes resulted in the recognition of $23,709,343 in loss on settlement of debt expenses.

On September 23, 2014, we issued 65,000 shares of common stock for services provided valued at $1,202.

Historical Activity Prior to 2014:

On October 14, 2013 we issued 75,532 post-split shares of our common stock in settlement of $50,000 due to a former related party plus associated accrued interest of $25,532. The conversion occurred within the terms of the promissory note and no gain or loss resulted.

On December 23, 2013 we issued 2,000,000 post-split shares of common stock in exchange for $20,000.These shares were sold to an officer of the company at a discount to market at the date of the agreement. The shares were valued at the closing price as of the date of the agreement and resulted in recognition of $1,000,000 in compensation services for the year ended December 31, 2013.

In 2013, our former CEO provided services to the Company without cost valued at $3,000.

Stock Issued upon conversion of debt-During the year ended December 31, 2012, we issued 70,205 post-split shares of our common stock in settlement of $50,000 due to a former related party plus associated accrued interest of $20,500. The conversion occurred within the terms of the promissory note and no gain or loss resulted.

Preferred Stock-We are currently authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of $0.00001 par value preferred stock. Effective December 31, 2007 the board of directors approved the cancellation of all previously issued preferred shares and approved the cancellation and extinguishment of all common and preferred share conversion rights of any kind, including without limitation, warrants, options, convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock of every series and accompanying conversion rights of any kind.

Stock Option-There are no employee or non-employee option grants.

Note 3. Related Party Transactions Not Disclosed Elsewhere

Mr. Zekri, our former Secretary and director, provided without cost to the Company his services valued at $800 per month which totaled $4,800 for 2013. He also provided without cost to the Company office space valued at $200 per month, which totaled $1,200 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013.

On December 23, 2013, in consideration for the investment by Mr. Weissberg of a total of $91,545, we issued and sold 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock for $20,000 and issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $71,545 for the remainder of the investment. Mr. Weissberg was appointed our CEO, CFO and Chairman on December 27, 2013. These 2,000,000 shares were sold at a price of $0.10, which represented a discount to market at the date of the transaction. In addition, the $71,545 note was convertible at a price of $1.00 per share, also a discount to market at the date of the transaction. The shares were valued at the closing price as of December 23, 2013, the date of the transaction, and resulted in recognition of $1,000,000 in compensation services for the year ended December 31, 2013.

During the 2nd quarter of 2014, Mr. Weissberg transferred and assigned $62,383, including accrued interest, of the principal amount of his $71,545 convertible note to several unaffiliated, third-party, accredited investors, retaining $11,536. All of these notes, in addition to a total of $57,373 evidenced by 11 other convertible notes held by non-affiliates, were converted by the holders, including Mr. Weissberg, the only affiliate, prior to June 30, 2014. The Company recognized a loss of $23.7 million because the conversion prices of $0.35 and $1.00 per share, respectively, were at a discount from the market price of the shares on the dates of the original issuances of the convertible notes and the fact that the conversion prices were not adjusted for the 1:100 reverse split.

Note 4. Disposition of Inactive Subsidiaries

On January 30, 2012, EQUR relinquished its 100% ownership and all rights to Centriforce Technology Corporation and its 50% ownership in Sub Sea Oil Technologies, Inc. The underlying assets of both Centriforce and SubSea had no value at that time.

Note 5. Convertible Notes

During 2013, the Company signed a series of twelve new unsecured promissory notes, bearing interest at 15% per annum, for an aggregate of $128,920 to related and unrelated parties, including one note for $71,545 which was due to the Company's chairman. The notes had maturity dates ranging from February 5, 2014 to December 31, 2014, with all amounts recorded as current liabilities. The notes have conversion rights that allow the holder of the note to convert the principal balance into the Company's common stock at the lender's sole discretion at $0.35 per share except for the note payable to the chairman in the amount of $71,545, which is convertible at $1.00 per share.

During the second quarter of 2014, Mr. Weissberg transferred and assigned $62,382, including accrued interest, of his $71,545 convertible note to unaffiliated, third-party, accredited investors, retaining $11,536. All of these notes, together with an additional $57,375 in notes, convertible at a price of $0.35 per share, and issued in 2013, plus accrued interest, were converted prior to June 30, 2014. The Company recognized a loss of $23,709,343 because the conversion price of $0.35 applicable to $57,375 in notes and $1.00 per share applicable to $71,545 in notes, respectively, were at a discount from the market prices of the shares on the dates of the original issuances.

In accordance with ASC 470, the Company has analyzed the beneficial nature of the conversion terms and determined that a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) exists because the effective conversion price was less than the quoted market price at the time of the issuance. The Company calculated the value of the BCF using the intrinsic method as stipulated in ASC 470. The BCF of $128,920 has been recorded as a discount to the 2013 notes payable and a corresponding entry to Additional Paid-in Capital. The historical aggregate discount arising from the BCF on all such notes is $161,577, and for the note balance of $128,920 the note discount was $128,063.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company has recognized $11,510 and $54,709 in accrued interest expense, respectively, and has amortized $91,066 and $0, respectively of the discount arising from the beneficial conversion feature which has also been recorded as interest expense.

Since Inception: On January 20, 2009, the Company received $50,000 through the issuance of a convertible note. The note bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum and has a maturity date of 12 months. The note is convertible into common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The company recorded a debt discount of $50,000 all of which was amortized to interest expense during 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 70,205 post-split shares in connection with the conversion of this debt into equity, along with $20,500 of accrued interest. The conversion occurred within the terms of the promissory note and no gain or loss resulted. The net balance of the note was zero as of 12/31/2012 and $50,000 as of 12/31/2011.

In January 18, 2010, the Company received $50,000 through the issuance of a convertible note. The note bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum and has a maturity date of 12 months. The note is convertible into common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The company recorded a debt discount of $50,000 all of which was amortized to interest expense during 2010. The net balance of the note was $50,000 as of 12/31/2012 and 12/31/2011.

During 2012, the Company received a total of $56,126 through the issuance of convertible notes to 5 shareholders. The notes bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum and having a maturity date of 12 months. The notes are convertible into common stock par value $0.1 per share. The Company recorded interest expense on the amount of $12,525 during 2012 and $12,610 in amortization of debt discount during 2012.

Note 6. Development Stage Activities and Going Concern

The Company is currently in the development stage, which it re-entered on January 1, 2011 and has limited operations. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs, and as such, has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of September 30, 2014, the cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its current business plan. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

None.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of September 30, 2014, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the  Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in internal controls. During the quarterly period covered by this report, no changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1. Description of Business, subheading "Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

None.

(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated by reference is identified by a parenthetical reference to the SEC filing that included such document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned.

E-QURE COR.
By: /s/ Ohad Goren
Ohad Goren
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 19, 2014

By: /s/ Gal Peleg
Gal Peleg
Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 19, 2014

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Ohad Goren
Ohad Goren
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 19, 2014

By: /s/ Gal Peleg
Gal Peleg
Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 19, 2014