Eargo, Inc. - Annual Report: 2022 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

Commission File Number 001-39616

Eargo, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (650) 351-7700

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ☐ NO ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing price of the shares of common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 30, 2022, was $22,580,118.

The number of shares of Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 20, 2023 was 20,741,841.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Table of Contents

i

Special note regarding forward-looking statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements about us and our industry that involve substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements regarding our strategy, future financial condition, future operations, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives of management and expected market growth, are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “design,” “due,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “objective,” “plan,” “ongoing,” “positioned,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “shall,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and other similar expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and future trends, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

ii

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that we have a reasonable basis for each forward-looking statement contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur at all. You should refer to the section titled “Risk Factors” for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

iii

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

Eargo, Inc. (“Eargo,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is a medical device company dedicated to improving the quality of life of people with hearing loss. Our innovative products and go-to-market approach address the major challenges of traditional hearing aid adoption, including social stigma, accessibility and cost.

We believe Eargo hearing aids are the first ever virtually invisible, rechargeable, completely in-the-canal, FDA-regulated devices indicated to compensate for mild to moderate hearing loss.

We market and sell our hearing aids primarily in a direct-to-consumer format, with a personalized, consumer-centric approach. Our commercial organization consists of a marketing team with deep experience in consumer-focused brand and performance marketing, a team of inside sales consultants, and a dedicated customer support team. Our differentiated, consumer-first approach empowers consumers to take control of their hearing by improving accessibility, with personalized, high-quality remote customer support from our hearing professionals (with remote customer support continuing for as long as a customer owns their Eargo hearing aid).

In an industry that has, in our opinion, historically been associated with limited brand awareness, we have developed a sophisticated brand-building strategy focused on consumer empowerment. We have also developed a robust technology and data-driven marketing platform that utilizes business intelligence, key performance metrics, machine learning and other marketing data to reinforce our growing brand recognition and to identify demographics, behaviors and marketing channels most relevant to our target audience. Eargo’s sales consultants leverage our digital marketing platform, which utilizes data-driven insights to iterate our sales tactics and create promotional offers, each with the goal of driving lead generation and increasing inbound lead conversions. We also see opportunity in nurturing long-term relationships with our customers to drive repeat purchases and increase their lifetime value, an objective facilitated by our provision of unlimited remote access to Eargo’s hearing professionals for the life of a customer’s Eargo hearing aid.

We have also established a highly capable research and development organization with what we believe is a rare combination of expertise in mechanical engineering, product design, audio processing, clinical and hearing science, consumer electronics and embedded software design. In addition, we employ strategic intellectual property protection in certain key areas. Our technical capabilities and commitment to innovation have allowed us to deliver significant product enhancements on a rapid development timeline, exemplified by our launch of seven iterations of the Eargo hearing aid system since 2017.

We believe that our differentiated hearing aids and consumer-centric approach have driven our sales of over 109,000 Eargo hearing aid systems, net of returns, as of December 31, 2022. We believe there is a large, growing and underserved market of people suffering from hearing loss, which we estimate included approximately 45 million adults (or approximately one in six adults) in the United States in 2022, of whom only approximately 25% actually owned a hearing aid.

The Eargo Difference

We are passionate about helping people hear better and are on a mission to change the way the world thinks about hearing loss.

Since our inception, our founding principle has been to dramatically improve the consumer experience at every step of the hearing care journey. Our products, customer support and marketing messaging are a direct result of that passion. We believe our primarily direct-to-consumer and omni-channel models can shift the paradigm in the treatment of hearing loss for the ultimate benefit of consumers.

Eargo hearing aids

Eargo hearing aids combine proprietary technology, engineering know-how and scientific and design expertise to offer high-quality performance in an in-the-canal form factor that makes them virtually invisible. We market a variety of models of hearing aids to provide customers with a range of cost and functionality options. Each generation of Eargo hearing aids has been improved with additional features, such as audio performance, enhanced physical fit and/or comfort and greater ease of use.

Our in-the-canal devices feature high-quality audio, are designed to provide up to 16 hours of battery life and feature Eargo’s proprietary soft and flexible medical-grade silicon tips. These silicon tips are removable, allowing for simple cleaning, and can be purchased separately in several sizes to accommodate individuals with different size ear canals. Eargo’s rechargeable hearing aids are designed for ease of use and maintenance while providing a comfortable fit for a majority of our target market. Additionally, several of our model devices are self-fitting as defined by the FDA. Eargo self-fitting hearing aids are adjusted by the user to meet the user’s hearing needs, without the need for pre-programming or a hearing test from a hearing care professional.

1

We expect to continue refining and improving Eargo hearing aids, and we have the intention of an approximate annual cadence of new product launches. To this end, we are working on the development of a cost-conscious offering as well as the next Eargo hearing aid model with improved functionality.

Our business model and customer journey

We sell our hearing aids primarily on a direct-to-consumer basis, engaging consumers through a mix of digital and traditional marketing as well as select commercial partnership, omni-channel (including retail) and other opportunities that are designed to appeal to prospective customers on a personal level and build our brand.

Eargo provides free educational resources as well as support from our team of sales consultants and hearing professionals, who help educate and guide prospective customers through addressing their hearing loss in a personalized and consultative experience.

While a hearing test is not necessary to purchase Eargo hearing aids, we offer an online, do-it-yourself hearing screening for prospective customers who are interested in learning more about their hearing. This screening is not intended to prevent, diagnose or treat hearing loss or any other disease or condition, but can assist customers in evaluating whether Eargo hearing aids may be right for them. Prospective customers can also utilize Eargo’s remote support system to receive guidance regarding matters such as use, charging and cleaning of Eargo hearing aids, and real-time audio setting modification for individualized hearing loss.

Customers are able to complete purchases over the phone with an Eargo sales consultant or directly on our website. The Eargo purchasing experience is designed to be simple and to improve the accessibility of hearing aids. In addition, we offer a general 45-day trial period.

Following the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) final rule regarding the creation of a new category of over-the-counter (“OTC”) hearing aids (the “OTC Final Rule”), we have focused efforts on transitioning to the new OTC framework and expanding our omni-channel approach, including exploring select additional commercial partnerships, retail, and other distribution opportunities. For example, we have a commercial arrangement with Victra, one of America’s largest wireless retailers, to facilitate access to our hearing screeners and demonstrate our devices at approximately 1,500 Victra store locations across the country; customers are also able to purchase or order Eargo hearing aids at such store locations. We believe that the OTC Final Rule may facilitate the opportunity to execute additional commercial partnerships, expanding our customers’ ability to learn about our hearing aids, obtain general information about their hearing through our current hearing screeners, and experience our devices in person prior to purchasing or ordering directly at retail locations.

Moreover, following the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, we have partnered with certain resellers and other distributors, including benefits managers, to offer Eargo hearing aids for sale through their online storefronts or portals. Under these partnerships, we sell Eargo hearing aids to resellers at wholesale prices, who in turn offer our products to end-customers through their respective online storefronts or portals. Generally, we fulfill and ship orders placed through these online storefronts or portals directly to end-customers, and we generally do not submit insurance claims on behalf of customers who purchase from one of these authorized resellers, including Victra. We believe these partnerships will help expand consumer access to our hearing aids and allow us to target high-intent customers more efficiently. We continue to look for additional partners to help expand our customer base.

Between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022, we did not accept insurance as a direct method of payment to the Company (referred to as “direct plan access” and discussed below under “—Insurance-Related Business—Insurance-Related Business following DOJ settlement”) and instead focused sales of our products to customers we refer to as “cash-pay” or “self-pay” customers, which includes upfront payment, credit card, and third-party financing, as well as third-party distributor, authorized reseller, or partner payments. We partner with third-party financing providers to make our products more accessible, and payment types may also be combined. When purchased directly through us, the Eargo hearing aid system typically arrives on average approximately three business days after shipping.

Once a customer purchases Eargo hearing aids, whether directly through us or through one of our partners, distributors, or authorized resellers, they are assigned to one of our hearing professionals, who provides complimentary, convenient support by phone, chat or e-mail.

Once a customer receives their Eargo hearing aids, their assigned hearing professional will schedule a welcome call to assist with proper use, fit and setting modification of the Eargo device. Our hearing professionals and customer care team are also available to provide unlimited support for as long as the customer owns an Eargo device. Additionally, we provide short, online training videos and other resources that customers can access online. The combination of these services allows us to deliver remote customer support in an efficient and streamlined manner.

We believe our business model and consumer-centric focus offer certain advantages relative to traditional sales channels (which are characterized by a business-to-business model in which hearing aid manufacturers rely on a fragmented network of independent audiology clinics to sell their devices to consumers), including in particular the convenience and accessibility of our remote customer

2

support as well as our consumer-centric focus. We offer free online education, convenient consultation and remote customer support, the ability to easily purchase the Eargo system, and fast delivery.

Insurance-Related Business

DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits

As previously disclosed, on September 21, 2021, we were informed that we were the target of a criminal investigation by the DOJ related to insurance claims we submitted for reimbursement on behalf of our customers covered by various federal employee health plans under the FEHB program, which is administered by the Office of Personnel Management (the “OPM”). The investigation also pertained to our role in claim submissions to federal employee health plans (collectively, the “DOJ investigation”). Total payments the Company received from the government in relation to claims submitted under the FEHB program, as subject to the DOJ investigation, net of any product returns and associated refunds, were approximately $44.0 million. Also, as previously disclosed, the third-party payor with whom historically we had the largest volume, which is one of the carriers contracted with the OPM under the FEHB program (“largest third-party payor”), conducted an audit of insurance claims for reimbursement (“claims”) submitted by us (the “Primary Audit”), which included a review of medical records. We were informed by the third-party payor conducting the Primary Audit that the DOJ was the principal contact related to the subject matter of the Primary Audit. In addition to the Primary Audit, we have been subject to a number of other audits of claims submitted to additional third-party payors (collectively with the Primary Audit, the “claims audits”). One of these claims audits did not relate to claims submitted under the FEHB program. On January 4, 2022, the DOJ confirmed to us that the investigation had been referred to the Civil Division of the DOJ and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas and the criminal investigation was no longer active.

On April 29, 2022, we entered into a civil settlement agreement with the U.S. government that resolved the previously disclosed DOJ investigation related to our role in claim submissions to various federal employee health plans under the FEHB program. We cooperated fully with the DOJ investigation. We deny the allegations in the settlement agreement, and the settlement is not an admission of liability by us. The allegations did not pertain to the quality or performance of our product. The settlement agreement provided for our payment of approximately $34.4 million to the U.S. government and resolved allegations that we submitted or caused the submission of claims for payment to the FEHB program using unsupported hearing loss-related diagnostic codes. As discussed further in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, based on the settlement agreement with the U.S. government, we recorded a settlement liability of $34.4 million in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021. The settlement amount was recorded as a reduction of revenue in the third quarter of 2021. On May 2, 2022, we paid the settlement amount.

The settlement with the U.S. government may not resolve all of the audits initiated by various third-party payors, and additionally we remain subject to a prepayment review of claims by the payor who conducted the Primary Audit.

From the time we learned of the DOJ investigation and until December 8, 2021, we continued to process orders for customers with potential insurance benefits (including FEHB program members) but suspended all claims submission activities and offered affected customers (i.e., customers using insurance benefits as a method of direct payment for transactions prior to December 8, 2021) the option to return their hearing aids or purchase their hearing aids without the use of their insurance benefits in case their claim was denied or ultimately not submitted by us to their insurance plan for payment (the “extended right of return”).

From December 8, 2021 until September 15, 2022, we did not accept insurance benefits as a method of direct payment. We determined that customer transactions using insurance benefits as a method of direct payment occurring between September 21, 2021 (when we learned of the DOJ investigation) and December 8, 2021 (when we temporarily stopped accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment) did not meet the criteria for revenue recognition. As a result, we did not recognize revenue for shipments within that timeframe to customers with potential insurance benefits, substantially all of whom were covered under the FEHB program.

We previously estimated that a majority of customers with unsubmitted claims would choose to return the hearing aid system if their insurance provider denied their claim or the claim was ultimately not submitted by us for payment, resulting in an increase in expected product returns from sales transactions that occurred prior to September 21, 2021 and recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021. Returns associated with unsubmitted claims reduce the sales returns reserve, with a corresponding reduction in the related accounts receivable at the time the product is returned.

We estimated that, in addition to the customers who chose to return their hearing aid systems, a significant number of customers whose claims were denied by payors or not submitted by us for payment would not pay for or return the hearing aid system, resulting in bad debt expense that was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, we made the determination not to seek payment for approximately $16.1 million from customers with unsubmitted and unpaid claims. We accounted for this decision as a pricing concession and, during the year ended December 31, 2022 recorded a $16.1 million reduction to our insurance-related accounts receivable balance, along with related

3

reduction to net revenue of $11.6 million and an allowance for credit losses balance of $4.5 million for such unsubmitted and unpaid claims. Further, we simultaneously recorded a decrease in our insurance-related sales return reserve of $11.3 million, with a corresponding increase of $11.3 million to net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 related to unsubmitted and unpaid claims. These changes resulted in a decrease in net revenue of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Insurance-related business following DOJ settlement

Between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022, we did not accept insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to the Company, a practice we refer to as “direct plan access.” In “direct plan access,” we submit an insurance claim on behalf of an Eargo customer to their insurance plan, or support an Eargo customer in their own claim submission, and the customer’s insurance benefits are utilized for the purchase, in whole or in part. Common forms of utilization can include, but are not limited to, co-pay, payment by a third-party payor to either Eargo or the customer, reimbursement by a third-party payor to the customer, or application toward a customer’s deductible.

Because we do not currently have contracts with any FEHB carriers, third-party payors, or other insurance providers, our products are considered out-of-network with such payors and insurance providers. We do not believe that the reimbursement amounts, patient co-payment amounts, or the claims submission process, including medical necessity and other documentation requirements, depend on whether we are in-network or out-of-network with that FEHB carrier or other FEHB plans. To illustrate, the hearing aid benefit in an FEHB plan is a set amount that covers the hearing aid itself and related fees and supplies, regardless of the plan option and regardless of whether the hearing aid is provided by a preferred, participating, or non-participating provider (i.e., regardless of whether it is in-network or out-of-network), which is not always the case for other benefit categories. However, depending on the FEHB carrier or third-party payor, payment may be made directly to the patient rather than to us if Eargo is out-of-network.

Beginning on September 15, 2022, we resumed our direct plan access insurance-based business, accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in certain limited circumstances, when the customer has undergone additional testing by an independent, licensed healthcare provider to establish medical necessity, with supporting clinical documentation. We are evaluating additional alternatives for testing or establishing medical necessity, including, but not limited to, contracting with third parties or existing networks of licensed healthcare providers, and/or establishing a management services organization, separate from our existing corporate structure, that manages professional entities that employ licensed healthcare providers. These alternatives involve significant time and related activities, including, but not limited to, development of additional internal processes, training, and compliance and quality control programs, coordination with external healthcare providers and professional services organizations, and evaluation of and compliance with state-by-state regulatory requirements. We cannot provide any assurance as to the efficacy of the processes that we have established or the extent to which such processes will need to be changed, or additional processes established, or the associated timing or costs, whether we will be successful in implementing any of them, or the impact that such processes and changes may have on our business and operations. If we are unable to successfully implement at least one of these alternatives for testing, or to otherwise establish additional acceptable processes to support claims that we may submit for reimbursement, we expect that we may not be able to submit future claims in sufficient volume to meaningfully restore or expand the amount of our insurance-based business related to direct plan access. Further, the OTC Final Rule, described in greater detail below, which became effective on October 17, 2022, may lead payors to take additional actions, such as excluding OTC hearing aids from coverage, further limiting our ability to access insurance coverage, or there may be a delay in accessing insurance coverage as payors seek to address the OTC Final Rule in their offered benefits, if at all, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are also seeking to establish relationships with benefits managers or managed care providers. Employer self-funded plans or other health plans may at times offer supplemental benefits, which may include hearing aid benefits or general “over-the-counter” benefits; they may in those cases contract with benefits managers or managed care providers in the administration of such supplemental benefits. In this role, among other things, benefits managers are responsible for selecting benefits vendors, i.e., vendors whose products or services are eligible to be covered by the supplemental benefit. The vendors themselves, or Eargo in this role, are not responsible for claims submissions but instead fulfill the product order from the customer through the benefits manager.

We cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to maintain or increase our participation in arrangements with third-party payors, insurance carriers, benefits managers, or managed care providers or that we will be adequately reimbursed or otherwise paid by such parties for the products we sell, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Patient Square Capital Investment

On June 24, 2022, after reviewing all available alternatives to secure the funding needed to support our ongoing operations and pursuit of our business strategies, and a potential sale of the Company, we entered into an agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with PSC Echo, LP (the “PSC Stockholder”), an affiliate of Patient Square Capital (“Patient Square”), and Drivetrain Agency Services, LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, we issued approximately $105.5 million in two tranches of senior secured convertible notes (the “Notes”) and agreed to conduct a rights offering for an aggregate of 18.75

4

million shares of common stock to stockholders as of a record date determined by our Board, at an offering price of $10.00 per share of common stock (the “Rights Offering”). Pursuant to the Rights Offering, which closed on November 23, 2022, we sold an aggregate of approximately 2.9 million shares to our existing stockholders, from which we received net proceeds of $27.6 million, and, in accordance with the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, the Notes converted into 15,821,299 shares of our common stock, in each case, on a post-reverse stock split basis, representing approximately 76.3% of our outstanding common stock as of the date of conversion.

In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, we had also entered into an Investors’ Rights Agreement with the PSC Stockholder, pursuant to which, among other things, the PSC Stockholder has the right to nominate a number of directors to our Board that is proportionate to the PSC Stockholder’s ownership of the Company, rounded up to the nearest whole number (and which shall in no event be less than one). As a result, following the closing of the Rights Offering and the conversion of the Notes, the PSC Stockholder has the right to nominate six directors to our Board. The PSC Stockholder exercised its right to nominate three directors to the Board, Trit Garg, M.D., Karr Narula and Justin Sabet-Peyman, in December 2022.

As of March 20, 2023, the PSC Stockholder held 15,821,299 shares, representing approximately 76.3% of our outstanding common stock. As a result of Patient Square’s ownership position, we are considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of the marketplace rules (the “Listing Rules”) of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) and Patient Square may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval.

Seasonality

In the past we have experienced, and we may continue to experience, seasonality in our business, with higher sales volumes in quarters when we commercially launch new products and in the fourth calendar quarter as a result of holiday promotional activity. However, since our public disclosure of the DOJ investigation and our related decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022, we have experienced and may continue to experience a material decline in gross systems shipped (as further discussed in “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits”). As a result, seasonal factors did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the three months and year ended December 31, 2022. Negative publicity, including in relation to the DOJ investigation, the claims audits, and other legal proceedings has and could continue to harm our reputation and brand and diminish consumer confidence in our products, which may further impact any seasonal trends in our business.

Research and development

We are committed to ongoing research and development. Since 2017, we have launched seven generations of our hearing aids, each adding performance and technical enhancements at different price points.

We are focused on continuing to launch new versions of the Eargo hearing aid with increased functionality and improved sound quality, amplification, noise reduction, fit, comfort, water resistance and ease-of-use, as well as reduced cost of goods and better connectivity. Our development priorities also include expanding and refining our refurbishment capabilities. We believe that the continued introduction of new products is critical to maintaining existing customers, attracting new customers, achieving market acceptance of our products and maintaining or increasing our competitive position in the market.

Manufacturing

We rely on a limited number of manufacturers for our products: Hana Microelectronics Group (“Hana”), a contract manufacturer based in Thailand, as well as our primary manufacturer, Pegatron Corporation (“Pegatron”), headquartered in Taiwan and with manufacturing facilities throughout Asia. Pegatron manufactures the Eargo 5, Eargo 6, and Eargo 7 hearing aid systems out of its facilities in Suzhou, China. We rely on several third-party suppliers for the components used in our hearing aids, including semiconductor components, such as integrated circuits, as well as batteries, microphones and receivers.

We believe that these third-party facilities and suppliers will be adequate to meet our current and anticipated manufacturing needs. We do not currently plan to manufacture our hearing aids or any related components ourselves.

Manufacturing facilities that produce medical devices and/or their component parts intended for distribution world-wide are subject to regulation and periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA and other domestic and international regulatory agencies. In the United States, any products we sell are required to be manufactured in compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, which covers the methods used in, and the facilities used for, the design, testing, control, manufacturing, labeling, quality assurance, packaging, storage and shipping of our products.

The distribution of our hearing aids is handled directly through a third-party logistics provider. Our finished hearing aids are shipped from our contract manufacturer to the third-party logistics provider’s facility and are distributed from there to customers or retailers or other partners, as applicable.

5

While we have not been directly impacted by any major disruption to our supply chain or access to necessary raw materials and component parts for the manufacture of our products to date that have impacted our ability to service customers, disruptions have occurred across a number of industries and we cannot provide any assurance that future disruptions will not emerge as a result of the ongoing supply chain issues, inflation, the COVID-19 pandemic or other external factors. To date, increases in our product component pricing have occurred but have not had a material impact on supply continuity or gross margin. We have taken steps to monitor our supply chain and actions to address limited supply and increasing lead times, including outreach to critical suppliers and spot market purchases. For more information, please see the risks described under the caption “We rely on the timely supply of high-quality components, parts and finished products, and our business could suffer if suppliers or manufacturers are unable to procure raw materials or other components of an acceptable quality (or at all) or otherwise fail to meet their delivery obligations, raise prices or cease to supply us with components, parts or products of acceptable quality” in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on 10-K.

Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and confidentiality and invention assignment agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. As of December 31, 2022, we had 26 issued U.S. patents, 26 patents outside the United States, 9 pending U.S. patent applications and 12 pending foreign patent applications. Our patents include utility patents covering technology ranging from remote control of our hearing aids to design patents covering the housing and securing mechanisms for our hearing aids. We have foreign patents in the EU, Australia, Canada, China, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Japan, Singapore and South Korea. We own all of our patents and do not rely on any licenses to utilize the technology covered by these patents. The earliest of our patents is expected to expire in 2025. An issued U.S. patent with claims generally directed to an open ear canal hearing aid comprised of certain electronics and securing portions and an issued U.S. patent with claims generally directed to an adjustable securing mechanism for a space access device are each expected to expire in 2030.

Our pending patent applications may not result in issued patents, and we cannot assure you that any current or subsequently issued patents will protect our intellectual property rights. Third parties may challenge certain patents issued to us as invalid, may independently develop similar or competing technologies or may design around any of our patents. We cannot be certain that any of the steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation of our intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights in these countries as fully as in the United States.

There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the medical device industry. Any litigation claims against us, independent of their validity, may result in substantial costs and the diversion of resources with no assurance of success. As of December 31, 2022, there is no active patent litigation involving us.

As of December 31, 2022, we had 35 trademark registrations and 6 pending trademark applications worldwide.

Competition

We compete in the hearing aid market against manufacturers, clinics and retailers of hearing aids, other direct-to-consumer providers of hearing aids and, to a lesser extent, providers of personal sound amplification products (“PSAPs”). We believe that the primary competitive factors in the market are:

After a period of industry consolidation, five manufacturers control a vast majority of the global hearing aid industry today. These manufacturers are GN Store Nord, Sonova, Starkey, William Demant and WS Audiology, all of which have established products and substantially greater financial, sales and marketing, manufacturing and development resources than we possess. In addition to these manufacturers, we also compete against hearing clinics and retailers, such as Costco. Costco sells behind-the-ear, in-the-ear and in-the-canal hearing aids from traditional manufacturers, as well as its Kirkland Signature label behind-the-ear hearing aids, each at

6

various price points. We also compete against other direct-to-consumer hearing aid providers such as Audicus and Lively (which was acquired by GN Store Nord and rebranded as Jabra Enhance), which, similar to our business model, allow consumers to purchase hearing aids without visiting a clinic and provide remote support for their products.

Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements, including with respect to changes to the industry landscape potentially arising as a result of the FDA’s adoption and implementation of the OTC Final Rule (see “Government Regulation—Regulation by the FDA” for more information).

Prior to the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, no OTC category of hearing aids existed. The creation of the new category of OTC hearing aids by the FDA could materially alter the competitive environment for hearing loss treatment. The FDA and the Biden administration have stated that the intention of the OTC Final Rule is to reduce barriers to access, foster innovation in hearing aid technology, and promote the wide availability of low-cost hearing aids. We expect the removal of regulatory barriers to entry will facilitate the introduction of new and varied product designs by incumbent and new competitors. For instance, a number of competitors have begun marketing OTC hearing aids since the adoption of the OTC Final Rule, including existing competitors in the hearing aid industry, such as WS Audiology (in partnership with Sony Electronics) and GN Store Nord (through its Jabra brand), as well as new entrants into the hearing aid industry such Nuheara (through a licensing partnership with HP, Inc.).

In connection with the OTC Final Rule, we have expended, and will continue to expend, significant time and resources evaluating the OTC Final Rule and ensuring that our devices and processes comply with the new requirements in order to market our products in line with our primary direct-to-consumer business and omni-channel models. It is possible that the OTC Final Rule may lead to additional commercial partnership, omni-channel, including retail, or other opportunities, although there are no assurances that it will do so.

Considering the resources and advantages that our competitors maintain, even if our technology and consumer-first business model and distribution strategy are more effective than the technology and distribution strategy of our competitors, current or potential customers might accept competitor products in lieu of purchasing our products. We anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future, and may also experience intensifying pricing pressures, as existing companies and competitors develop new or improved products and distribution strategies and as new companies enter the market with new technologies and distribution strategies (possibly with increased frequency due to the implementation of the OTC Final Rule, discussed above). We may not be able to compete effectively against these organizations. Our ability to compete successfully and to increase our market share is dependent upon our approach to addressing unmet needs in the hearing aid industry. Increased competition in the future could adversely affect our revenue, revenue growth rate, if any, margins and market share.

Government regulation

We operate in a complex regulatory environment with an extensive and evolving set of federal, state and local governmental laws, regulations, and other requirements. These laws, regulations and other requirements are promulgated and overseen by a number of different legislative, regulatory, administrative and quasi-regulatory bodies, each of which may have varying interpretations, judgments or related guidance. For example, our products and operations are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), which regulates, among other things, the research, development, testing, design, manufacturing, approval, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, advertising, promotion, marketing, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and import and export of medical devices in the United States to assure the safety and effectiveness of medical products for their intended use. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) also regulates the advertising of our products in the United States. Further, we are subject to laws directed at preventing fraud and abuse, which subject our sales and marketing, training, and other practices to government scrutiny.

As such, we utilize considerable resources on an ongoing basis to monitor, assess and respond to applicable legislative, regulatory, and administrative requirements, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful in our efforts to adhere to all of these requirements. Additional discussion on certain of these laws, regulations and other requirements is set forth below in this section.

If any of our personnel, representatives or operations are alleged to have violated these or other laws, regulations or requirements, we could suffer severe consequences, including material harm to our reputation, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, among other things.

We expect that our industry will continue to be subject to extensive and complex regulation, the scope and effect of which are difficult to predict. For additional detail on risks related to each of the foregoing, see the Risk Factors titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer and omni-channel business models and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products,” “Our hearing aids are subject to extensive government regulation at the federal and state level, and our failure to comply with applicable requirements could harm our business,” and “If we fail to comply with U.S. or foreign federal and state healthcare regulatory laws, we could be subject to penalties, including, but not limited to, administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement,

7

exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs and the curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely impact our reputation and business operations.”

Regulation by the FDA

The FDA classifies hearing aids, including in-the-canal hearing aids such as our products, as medical devices. In the United States, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”), as well as FDA regulations and other federal and state statutes and regulations, govern, among other things, medical device design and development, preclinical and clinical testing, device safety, premarket clearance and approval, establishment registration and device listing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising and promotion, sales and distribution, export and import, recalls and field safety corrective actions, and post-market surveillance, including complaint handling and medical device reporting of adverse events. Failure to comply with applicable requirements may subject a company to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as warning or untitled letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties and criminal prosecution. The FDA can also refuse to approve or clear pending product applications.

The FDA classifies medical devices into three classes (Class I, II or III) based on the degree of risk associated with a device and the level of regulatory control deemed necessary to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA’s general controls for medical devices, which include compliance with the FDA’s current good manufacturing practices (“cGMPs”) for devices, as reflected in the Quality System Regulation (“QSR”), establishment registration and device listing, reporting of adverse events, and truthful, non-misleading labeling, advertising and promotional materials. Some Class I devices also require premarket clearance by the FDA through the premarket notification process set forth in Section 510(k) of the FDCA. Class II devices are subject to the FDA’s general controls and any other special controls deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, such as performance standards, product-specific guidance documents, special labeling requirements, patient registries and/or post-market surveillance. Most Class II devices must also comply with the FDA’s Section 510(k) premarket notification requirements. Class III devices are those that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury. Due to the level of risk associated with Class III devices, general and special controls alone are insufficient to assure their safety and effectiveness. Devices placed in Class III generally require the submission of a premarket approval (“PMA”) application demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of the device, which must be approved by the FDA prior to marketing, or the receipt of a de novo classification, which provides for the reclassification of the device into Class I or II. The PMA approval process is more stringent, time-consuming and expensive than the 510(k) clearance process; however, the 510(k) clearance process has also become increasingly stringent and expensive.

On August 17, 2022, the FDA published a final rule to establish new regulatory categories for OTC and prescription hearing aids (the “OTC Final Rule”). The OTC Final Rule implements relevant provisions of the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (“FDARA”), which set forth requirements for the FDA to create a new category of OTC hearing aids that are intended to be available without supervision, prescription, or other order, involvement or intervention of a licensed practitioner. Prior to the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, no OTC category of hearing aids existed. Following publication of a proposed rule in October 2021, the FDA issued its OTC Final Rule with requirements for labelling, conditions of sale, performance standards, design requirements and other provisions under which manufacturers may elect to market hearing aids as either OTC or prescription devices, or both. In addition, under FDARA, the OTC hearing aid controls promulgated in the OTC Final Rule preempt any state or local requirement specifically related to hearing products that would restrict or interfere with commercial activity involving OTC hearing aids. The OTC Final Rule became effective on October 17, 2022, although certain previously marketed devices have until April 14, 2023 to come into compliance with the OTC Final Rule.

We have marketed in the past, and continue to market, certain Eargo system devices as Class I air-conduction or Class II wireless air-conduction hearing aids under existing regulations at 21 CFR 874.330 and 874.3305, respectively, both of which are exempt from 510(k) premarket review. In June 2022, we submitted a 510(k) premarket notification seeking FDA clearance of expanded labelling for our Eargo 5 and Eargo 6 hearing aids under the “self-fitting” regulation at 21 CFR 874.3323. In December 2022, we received FDA 510(k) clearance for Eargo 5 and Eargo 6 as Class II self-fitting air-conduction hearing aids. Additionally, in January 2023, we launched the Eargo 7 as our third over-the-counter, 510(k) cleared self-fitting device. We plan to market our devices as OTC hearing aids and intend to comply with all applicable OTC regulatory requirements as of the compliance date for currently marketed devices on April 14, 2023, or sooner. We may also seek to market certain devices as prescription hearing aids, which would require compliance with separate physical and electronic labeling requirements under the OTC Final Rule.

8

In connection with the OTC Final Rule, we have expended, and will continue to expend, significant time and resources evaluating the OTC Final Rule and ensuring that our devices and processes are in compliance with the new requirements in order to market our products in line with our primary direct-to-consumer business and omni-channel models. It is possible that the OTC Final Rule may lead to additional commercial partnership, omni-channel, including retail, or other opportunities, although there are no assurances that it will do so. The OTC Final Rule and the responses thereto by leading insurance providers could also materially impact our efforts to resume submitting claims for customers with potential insurance benefits or have other unforeseen impacts on our business and results of operations.

Please see the Risk Factor titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer business model and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products” for more information.

510(k) clearance

If not exempted from the FDA’s 510(k) notification requirement, to obtain 510(k) clearance for a medical device, an applicant must submit a premarket notification to the FDA demonstrating that the device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally marketed device, commonly known as the “predicate device.” A legally marketed predicate device may include a device that was legally marketed in the United States prior to May 28, 1976 for which a PMA is not required (commonly known as a “pre-amendments device” based on the date the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 were enacted), a device which the FDA has reclassified from Class III to Class II or I, or a device which has been found substantially equivalent to such a device through the 510(k) process. A device is considered to be substantially equivalent if, with respect to the predicate device, it has the same intended use and has either (i) the same technological characteristics, or (ii) different technological characteristics, but the information provided in the 510(k) submission demonstrates that the device does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness and is at least as safe and effective as the predicate device. A showing of substantial equivalence may sometimes, but not always, require clinical data. Before the FDA will accept a 510(k) submission for substantive review, the FDA will first assess whether the submission satisfies a minimum threshold of acceptability. If the FDA determines that the 510(k) submission is incomplete, the FDA will issue a “Refuse to Accept” letter which generally outlines the information the FDA believes is necessary to permit a substantive review and to reach a determination regarding substantial equivalence. An applicant must submit the requested information before the FDA will proceed with additional review of the submission. Once a 510(k) submission is accepted for review, the FDA has 90 days to review and issue a determination. As a practical matter, clearance often takes longer. The FDA may request additional information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence, which may significantly prolong the review process. The review period is suspended during the time the additional information request is pending. Unless a specific exemption applies, 510(k) premarket notification submissions are subject to user fees.

Medical devices can be marketed only for the indications for which they are cleared or approved. After a device has received 510(k) clearance for a specific intended use, any change or modification that significantly affects its safety or effectiveness, such as a significant change in the design, materials or method of manufacture, or that would constitute a new or major change in intended use, may require a new 510(k) clearance or PMA approval and payment of an additional FDA user fee. The determination as to whether or not a modification constitutes such a change is initially left to the manufacturer using available FDA guidance; however, the FDA may review this determination to evaluate the regulatory status of the modified product at any time and may require the manufacturer to cease marketing and recall the modified device until new 510(k) clearance or PMA approval is obtained. The manufacturer may also be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.

Clinical trials

Clinical trials are sometimes required for 510(k) clearance. Such trials generally require submission of an investigational device exemption (“IDE”) application to the FDA for a specified number of patients and study sites, unless the product is deemed to be a non-significant risk device which may be subject to more abbreviated IDE requirements. The appropriate institutional review boards (“IRBs”) at the clinical sites must also approve the study before clinical trials may begin. Clinical trials are subject to extensive monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements. Clinical trials must be conducted under the oversight of IRBs for the relevant clinical trial sites and must comply with FDA regulations, including but not limited to those relating to good clinical practices (“GCPs”), which include the requirement that all research subjects provide their informed consent for participation in each clinical study. The clinical trial sponsor, the FDA or the IRB could suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Even if a trial is completed, the results of clinical testing may not adequately demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the device or may otherwise not be sufficient to obtain FDA clearance to market the product.

9

Labeling and sale

All hearing aids commercially distributed in the United States must comply with specific FDA labeling requirements. These requirements address the labeling of the device itself and any accompanying software, as well as the User Instructional Brochure that must be provided to all potential hearing aid recipients.

Prior to the OTC Final Rule, FDA regulations required that the marketing of hearing aids comply with certain “conditions for sale,” including, among other things, the requirement that prospective hearing aid users must undergo a medical evaluation (or provide a signed waiver) before a hearing aid may be dispensed, along with certain recordkeeping requirements. In 2016, the FDA issued a guidance document stating that it did not intend to enforce the medical evaluation, waiver, or recordkeeping requirements prior to the dispensing of Class I air-conduction and Class II wireless air-conduction hearing aids to individuals 18 years of age and older. We previously marketed our devices pursuant to this exercise of enforcement discretion until the requirement was eliminated with the OTC Final Rule. Under the OTC Final Rule, we must comply with new requirements for labelling, conditions of sale, performance standards, design requirements and other provisions applicable to our hearing aids as either OTC or prescription devices, or both.

Quality System Regulation

The hearing aids that we commercially distribute in the United States are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA and certain state agencies. This includes product listing and establishment registration requirements, which facilitate FDA inspections and other regulatory actions. We are required to adhere to applicable cGMP requirements, as set forth in the QSR, which require manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all phases of the design and manufacturing process. We are also required to verify that our suppliers maintain facilities, procedures and operations that comply with applicable quality and regulatory requirements. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic announced or unannounced inspections of medical device manufacturing facilities, which may include the facilities of contractors. FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from the QSR and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon us and our third-party manufacturers. Noncompliance with these regulations can result in, among other things, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recalls or seizures of products, total or partial suspension of production, FDA refusal to grant 510(k) clearance or PMA approval to new devices, withdrawal of existing clearances or approvals, and criminal prosecution.

Post-market surveillance

We must also comply with post-market surveillance regulations, including medical device reporting (“MDR”) requirements which require that we review and report to the FDA any incident in which our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, and any incident in which our product has malfunctioned if that malfunction would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur. We must also comply with medical device correction and removal reporting regulations, which require manufacturers to report to the FDA corrections and removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health. Although we may undertake recall actions voluntarily, we must submit detailed information on any recall action to the FDA, and the FDA can order a medical device recall in certain circumstances.

In addition to post-market quality and safety actions, labeling and promotional activities are subject to scrutiny by the FDA and, in certain circumstances, by the FTC. Medical devices approved or cleared by the FDA may not be promoted for unapproved or uncleared uses, otherwise known as “off-label” promotion. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including substantial monetary penalties and criminal prosecution.

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including delays in or failures to report incidents to the FDA as required under the MDR regulations, can result in enforcement action by the FDA, which can include any of the following sanctions:

10

Other healthcare laws and regulations

The healthcare industry is also subject to federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and physician payment transparency laws, as well as patient data privacy and security and consumer protection and unfair competition laws and regulations. Our operations are also subject to certain state and local hearing care laws, including those applicable to the licensure and registration of audiologists and other individuals that dispense hearing aids, sales and marketing practices, interactions with consumers, consumer incentive and other promotional programs, and state corporate practice and fee-splitting prohibitions.

Fraud and abuse laws

In addition to the FDA, other broadly applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations apply to our operations and business practices. These laws may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we conduct our operations, including our direct-to-consumer activities and sales and marketing practices as well as other business practices. Additionally, we are subject to numerous federal healthcare anti-fraud laws, including the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the Physician Self-Referral Law and the False Claims Act, that are intended to reduce fraud, waste and abuse in the healthcare industry, and analogous state laws that may apply to healthcare items and services paid by all payors, including self-pay patients and private insurers. These laws are broad and subject to evolving interpretations. They prohibit many arrangements and practices that are lawful in industries other than healthcare, including pricing, sales and marketing activities, sales commissions, customer incentive and other promotional programs, and the provision of gifts and business courtesies. We must operate our business within the requirements of these laws. Violations of any of these health regulatory laws may result in potentially significant penalties, including criminal and civil and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens, diminished profits and future earnings, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.

In addition, the U.S. Physician Payments Sunshine Act (as amended by the Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act) requires manufacturers to report to the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) detailed information about financial arrangements with physicians (as defined by statute), certain non-physician practitioners, including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and teaching hospitals. These reporting provisions preempt state laws that require reporting of the same information, but not those that require reports of different or additional information. Failure to comply subjects manufacturers to significant civil monetary penalties.

State licensing, corporate practice and fee-splitting prohibitions

Regulation of the hearing aid industry exists in every state. These laws and regulations are primarily concerned with the licensure and registration of audiologists and other individuals and companies that dispense hearing aids, including procedures involving the fitting and dispensing of hearing aids. In addition, most states require warranty and return policies for consumers allowing for the return of product, and restrict hearing aid advertising and marketing practices. These state laws are subject to change, and states may impose more stringent requirements for dispensers of hearing aids, complicating our compliance efforts. In August 2022, the FDA adopted the OTC Final Rule, providing that, among other things, any state or local requirement specifically related to hearing products that would restrict or interfere with commercial activity involving OTC hearing aids would be preempted. A determination that we are in violation of applicable laws and regulations in any jurisdiction in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on us, particularly if we are unable to restructure our operations and arrangements to comply with the requirements of that jurisdiction, if we are required to restructure our operations and arrangements at a significant cost, or if we are subject to penalties or other adverse action. Additionally, applicable federal laws and regulations continue to evolve.

Our arrangements with hearing professionals may implicate certain state laws, commonly referred to as the corporate practice of learned professions, including audiology, and fee-splitting laws, which are intended to prevent unlicensed persons from interfering with or influencing the audiologist’s or other hearing care specialist’s professional judgment. These laws vary from state to state, including those where we do business, and are subject to broad interpretation and enforcement by state regulators. In the event that regulatory authorities or other third parties were to challenge these arrangements, we could be subject to adverse judicial or administrative interpretations, to civil or criminal penalties, our contracts could be found legally invalid and unenforceable or we could be required to restructure our arrangements with our audiologists and other licensed professionals. Audiologists and certain other hearing care specialists are required to maintain valid state licenses to practice and must comply with numerous state and local licensing laws and regulations, and each state defines the scope of practice for audiologists and other hearing care specialists through legislation and their respective state regulatory agencies and boards. Activities that qualify as professional misconduct under state law may subject our personnel to sanctions or may even result in loss of their licensure and could, possibly, subject us to sanctions as well.

Privacy and security

Numerous state, federal and foreign laws, regulations and standards govern the collection, use, access to, confidentiality and security of health-related and other personal information and could apply now or in the future to our operations or the operations of our partners. In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including data breach notification laws, health

11

information privacy and security laws and consumer protection laws and regulations govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other personal information. In addition, certain foreign laws govern the privacy and security of personal data, including health-related data. Privacy and security laws, regulations, and other obligations are constantly evolving, may conflict with each other to complicate compliance efforts, and can result in investigations, proceedings, or actions that lead to significant civil and/or criminal penalties and restrictions on data processing.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”), prohibits U.S. businesses and their representatives from offering to pay, paying, promising to pay or authorizing the payment of money or anything of value to a foreign official in order to influence any act or decision of the foreign official in his or her official capacity or to secure any other improper advantage in order to obtain or retain business. The FCPA also obligates companies whose securities are listed in the United States, like us, to comply with accounting provisions that require us to maintain books and records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the corporation, including international subsidiaries, if any, and to devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements. The scope of the FCPA includes interactions with certain healthcare professionals in many countries.

International laws

Globally, other countries have enacted anti-bribery laws and/or regulations similar to the FCPA. Violations of any of these anti-bribery laws, or allegations of such violations, could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and reputation.

Additionally, as described above, there are also international privacy laws that impose restrictions on the access, use, and disclosure of health information and, as in the United States, there are significant and complex laws and regulations pertaining to our products and business model. To the extent we expand internationally, we will need to expend time and resources evaluating and complying with any such laws and regulations. For more information, see the Risk Factors titled, “Any future international expansion will subject us to additional costs and risks that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations” and “We operate in a regulated industry and changes in the regulations or the implementation of existing regulations could affect our operations and prospects for future growth.”

Environmental matters

Our operations, properties and products are subject to a variety of U.S. and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, management and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous materials and waste and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. We believe that we are in material compliance with environmental laws and regulations applicable to us. However, our failure to comply with present and future requirements under these laws and regulations, or environmental contamination or releases of hazardous materials on our leased premises, as well as through disposal of our products, could cause us to incur substantial costs, including clean-up costs, personal injury and property damage claims, fines and penalties, costs to redesign our products or upgrade our facilities and legal costs, or require us to curtail our operations, any of which could seriously harm our business.

Human capital management

Employees

As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately 243 full-time employees worldwide, of which approximately 236 were employed in the United States. None of our employees is represented by a labor union or collective bargaining agreement, and we consider our employee relations to be good.

Talent attraction, development and retention

Our success depends in part on our continued ability to recruit, retain, develop and motivate a diverse population of talented employees at all levels of our organization. To succeed in a competitive industry, our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existing and additional employees.

In addition to acquiring new talent, we focus on growing and developing our existing talent. We conduct regular individual performance reviews in which managers provide regular feedback and coaching to assist with employee development. We make investments to enhance employees’ skill levels and provide professional opportunities for career development and advancement. Our learning and development experiences focus on onboarding new hires as well as offering workshops focused on skills development, including leadership development programs and people manager coaching, and compliance training.

12

Our leadership team focuses on identifying the next generation of leaders to ensure that the organization is prepared to fill critical roles with employees who are prepared to support the strategy of the business and respond to the needs of key stakeholders. Furthermore, although we had reductions-in-force in the fourth quarter of 2021 and the second quarter of 2022, we offered affected employees severance packages.

Diversity and inclusion

We view diversity as integral to our future success. Diversity in our workforce fosters innovation, while inclusion helps ensure that we have the right culture, processes, policies, and practices to make employees feel valued and included. Developing teams where team members feel heard, respected, and included is one of our core values. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 46% of our total US workforce was female and approximately 34% of our employees in domestic managerial roles were female. Minorities (non-White) constituted approximately 37% of our total US workforce and approximately 31% of our employees in domestic managerial roles were minorities as of the same date.

Compensation and benefits

We focus on paying employees fairly and competitively. As a medical device company in the healthcare industry, we recognize the importance of compensation and benefits that are designed to support the financial, mental, and physical well-being of our team members and their families. Our compensation packages typically include incentive plans comprised of discretionary stock-based compensation awards and cash-based performance bonus awards, health benefits, including options for medical plans, pharmacy, dental and vision coverage, a 401(k) plan, life and disability insurance, discretionary paid time off, family leave, a technology stipend for remote work, commuter benefit program, and a program for partial education reimbursement. Eligibility for, and the level of, benefits vary depending on team members’ full-time or part-time status, work location, compensation level, and tenure.

Health, safety and wellness

The physical health, financial wellbeing, life balance, and mental health of our employees are vital to our success. We remain focused on promoting the total wellness of our employees, including resources, programs and services to support their physical, mental and financial wellness. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, we have promoted the health, safety, and wellbeing of our employees and their families. We have established safety policies and protocols based on guidance from healthcare experts and public health leaders, and we regularly review and update them to reflect the best, most current information available.

Available information

Our Internet address is www.eargo.com. We routinely post important information for investors on our website in the “Investor Relations” section, which may be accessed from our homepage at www.eargo.com or directly at https://ir.eargo.com/. We use this website as a means of disclosing material, non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Accordingly, investors should monitor the Investor Relations section of our website, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls, presentations and webcasts. Our goal is to maintain the Investor Relations website as a portal through which investors can easily find or navigate to pertinent information about us, free of charge, including:

The content on our website is not incorporated by reference into, or a part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.

13

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Risk factor summary

Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under the heading “Risk Factors” and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC, before making investment decisions regarding our common stock.

14

Risk Factors

Our operating and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and related notes, before investing in our common stock. While we believe that the risks and uncertainties described below are the material risks currently facing us, additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also arise and materially affect our business.

Risks relating to our industry and business

We face considerable uncertainty in our business prospects, as a significant portion of our revenue has historically been dependent upon reimbursement from third-party payors participating in the FEHB program, but we have operated on a primarily “cash-pay” basis since December 8, 2021. We may be unsuccessful in validating and establishing processes to support the submission of claims for reimbursement from third-party payors, including those participating in the FEHB program. As a result, we have faced a significant reduction in revenue and any failure to establish additional processes to support reimbursement from third-party payors may significantly and adversely impact our business and growth prospects and our ability to sell our products. Additionally, potential opportunities for growth in our business outside of the FEHB program, such as the implementation of the FDA’s new OTC hearing aid regulatory framework and any potential insurance coverage for certain hearing aids, may not materialize and, as such, our business and growth prospects and our ability to sell our products may be materially and adversely impacted.

A significant portion of our revenue has historically been dependent on payments from third-party payors; for example, in the quarter ended September 30, 2021, 6,243 out of the 13,117 total gross systems shipped were for customers with potential insurance benefits. However, since December 8, 2021, we have operated on a primarily “cash-pay” basis.

Third-party payors periodically conduct pre- and post-payment reviews, including audits of previously submitted claims, and we are currently experiencing and may experience such reviews and audits of claims in the future. Historically, we submitted claims to a concentrated number of third-party payors under certain benefit plans, and substantially all such claims related to the FEHB program. We temporarily suspended all claims submission activities on September 22, 2021 when we learned of the investigation by the DOJ related to our role in customer reimbursement claim submissions to various federal employee health plans under the FEHB program.

On April 29, 2022, we entered into a civil settlement agreement with the U.S. government that resolved the DOJ investigation. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we paid approximately $34.4 million to the U.S. government. We cooperated fully with the DOJ investigation. We deny the allegations in the settlement agreement, and the settlement is not an admission of liability by us. Additionally, following the settlement with the U.S. government, we remain subject to prepayment review of claims by the third-party payor with whom historically we had the largest volume. An additional payor audit related to claims submitted for customers with FEHB plans also remains in process. While we intend to continue to work with applicable third-party payors with the objective of validating and establishing additional processes to support any future claims that we may submit for reimbursement and, as of September 15, 2022, we have begun to accept insurance benefits as a method of direct payment again under certain limited circumstances, we may not be able to arrive at additional acceptable processes or submit future claims, including under the FEHB program, in sufficient volume to meaningfully restore or expand our insurance-based business. For example, we do not currently conduct in-person hearing tests, and it is possible that in-person testing would be required to support any claims submissions, representing a significant change from our past processes and direct-to-customer business model that may adversely impact the attractiveness of our offerings to customers.

Between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022, we did not accept insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to us, a practice we refer to as “direct plan access.” In “direct plan access,” we submit an insurance claim on behalf of an Eargo customer to their insurance plan, or support an Eargo customer in their own claim submission, and the customer’s insurance benefits are utilized for the

15

purchase, in whole or in part. Common forms of utilization can include, but are not limited to, co-pay, payment by a third-party payor to either Eargo or the customer, reimbursement by a third-party payor to the customer, or application toward a customer’s deductible.

Because we do not currently have contracts with any FEHB carriers or other third-party payors, our products are considered out-of-network for such payors. We do not believe that the reimbursement amounts, patient co-payment amounts, or the claims submission process, including medical necessity requirements and documentation requirements, depend on whether we are in-network or out-of-network for that FEHB carrier or other FEHB plans. To illustrate, the hearing aid benefit in this FEHB plan is a set amount that covers the hearing aid itself and related fees and supplies, regardless of the plan option and regardless of whether the hearing aid is provided by a preferred, participating, or non-participating provider (i.e., regardless of whether it is in-network or out-of-network), which is not always the case for other benefit categories. However, depending on the FEHB carrier or third-party payor, payment may be made directly to the patient rather than to us if Eargo is out-of-network.

Beginning on September 15, 2022, we resumed our direct plan access insurance-based business, accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in certain limited circumstances, when the customer has undergone additional testing by an independent, licensed healthcare provider to establish medical necessity, with supporting clinical documentation. However, a majority of the claims we have submitted since instating this process are still pending adjudication by the payors, and although a portion of the claims we have submitted for reimbursement have been approved for payment and/or paid, others have been denied and are currently in the appeals process. We are evaluating additional alternatives for testing, including but not limited to contracting with third parties or existing networks and/or establishing a management services organization separate from our existing corporate structure that manages professional entities that employ licensed healthcare providers. These alternatives involve significant time and related activities, including, but not limited to, development of internal processes, training, and compliance and quality control programs, coordination with external healthcare providers and professional services organizations, and evaluation of and compliance with state-by-state regulatory requirements. We cannot provide any assurance as to the efficacy of the processes that we have recently established or the extent to which such processes will need to be changed, or additional processes established, or the associated timing or costs, whether we will be successful in implementing any of them, or the impact that such processes and changes may have on our business and operations. If we are unable to successfully implement at least one of these alternatives for testing, we expect that we will not be able to submit future claims in sufficient volume to meaningfully restore or expand the amount of our insurance-based business related to direct plan access going forward.

We intend to focus on both accessing third-party reimbursement and increasing coverage and reimbursement for our current products and any future products we may develop. However, we cannot provide any assurance as to the timing or costs associated with establishing processes to support the submission of claims, if we can do so at all, or the impact that such processes may have on our business and results of operations. Further, the OTC Final Rule may lead such payors to take additional actions further limiting our ability to access insurance coverage, or there may be a delay in accessing insurance coverage as payors seek to address the new OTC framework in their offered benefits, if at all, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Prior to the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, no OTC category of hearing aids existed, and certain carriers, including the third-party FEHB carrier with whom historically we had the largest volume, excluded from coverage so-called “over-the-counter” hearing aids and enhancement devices (such as personal sound amplification products, or “PSAPs”). Accordingly, the new regulatory category of OTC hearing aids created with the OTC Final Rule are not covered under certain plans as currently written, until such time as such carriers update their coverage policies to reflect the newly established OTC category under the OTC Final Rule, if ever. It is our understanding that the third-party FEHB carrier that administers approximately two-thirds of all FEHB benefits nationwide currently does not intend to update its coverage requirements for hearing aids following the recent OTC Final Rule. In addition, even if health plans update their coverage policies to include the new regulatory category of OTC hearing aids, they nonetheless may require a prescription, evaluation or diagnostic test conducted by a licensed healthcare professional to establish medical necessity and/or establish lower reimbursement rates for OTC hearing aids. Although we may seek to market certain of our devices as prescription hearing aids, payors, including the third-party FEHB carrier that administers approximately two-thirds of all FEHB benefits nationwide, may still not provide coverage for such devices because they are also offered OTC. We may need to work with individual carriers (including FEHB plans) to determine coverage for our hearing aids, including on a claim-by-claim basis with individual payors, which may be time-consuming and unpredictable. Coverage and payment levels are determined at each third-party payor’s discretion, and we have limited control over such third parties’ decision making with respect to coverage and payment levels or over their claims submissions processes and timelines. Coverage restrictions and reductions in reimbursement levels or payment methodologies may negatively impact our business and ability to sell products.

We are also seeking to establish further relationships with benefits managers or managed care providers. Employer self-funded plans or other health plans may at times offer supplemental benefits, which may include hearing aid benefits or general “over-the-counter” benefits; they may in those cases contract with benefits managers or managed care providers in the administration of such supplemental benefits. In this role, among other things, benefits managers are responsible for selecting benefits vendors or, in other words, vendors whose products or services are eligible to be covered by the supplemental benefit. The vendors themselves, or Eargo in this role, are not responsible for claims submissions but instead fulfill the product order from the customer through the benefits manager.

16

We cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to maintain or increase our participation in arrangements with third-party payors, insurance carriers, benefits managers, or managed care providers or that we will be adequately reimbursed or otherwise paid by such parties for the products we sell, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

As a result of the change to a primarily “cash-pay” business model, we have faced a significant reduction in revenue and reduced growth prospects. If we are unable to establish processes to support reimbursement from third-party payors, our business and growth prospects and our ability to sell our products may be significantly and adversely impacted. Our future growth prospects may also depend on insurance coverage, if any, for certain hearing aids (which may not include Eargo hearing aids). We may never achieve sufficient additional third-party reimbursement to meaningfully restore or expand our insurance-based business.

We cannot predict whether, under what circumstances, or at what payment levels third-party payors will cover and reimburse our products. If we fail to establish and maintain broad adoption of our products or fail to penetrate the insurance and managed care markets for our products, our ability to generate revenue could be harmed and our prospects and our business could suffer. To the extent we sell our products internationally, market acceptance may depend, in part, upon the availability of coverage and reimbursement within prevailing healthcare payment systems. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country and include both government-sponsored healthcare and private insurance. We may not obtain international coverage and reimbursement approvals in a timely manner, if at all. Our failure to receive such approvals would negatively impact market acceptance of our products in the international markets in which those approvals are sought. Please also see the Risk Factor titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer business model and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products.”

Our negative cash flows and current lack of financial resources raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our future capital requirements may be substantial, and if we are unable to raise additional funding to meet our operational needs, we will be forced to limit or cease our operations and/or liquidate our assets.

We believe that, without any future financing, our current resources are insufficient to satisfy our obligations as they become due within one year from the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our negative cash flows and current lack of financial resources raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. We anticipate our future capital requirements will be substantial and that we will need to raise significant additional capital to fund our operations through equity or debt financing, or some combination thereof; however, additional capital may not be available to us on acceptable terms on a timely basis, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional funding to meet our operational needs, we will be forced to limit or cease our operations and/or liquidate our assets, in which case it is likely that investors would lose part or all of their investment.

Our expected future capital requirements and ability to raise additional capital will depend on many factors, including but not limited to the following:

17

As a result of the Rights Offering and conversion of the Notes, our stockholders may have experienced substantial dilution of their holdings and the PSC Stockholder has obtained a controlling interest in us. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant further dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock.

Debt financing, if available, is likely to involve restrictive covenants limiting our flexibility in conducting future business activities. Even if we are able to raise significant additional capital necessary to continue our operations, if we are unable to obtain additional adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to pursue our business objectives, develop our technology and products, and respond to business opportunities, challenges, unforeseen circumstances, or developments, including the implementation of the OTC Final Rule, could be significantly limited, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as actual events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults or non-performance by financial institutions or transactional counterparties, could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations.

Actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as receiver. On March 12, 2023, the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC jointly released a statement that depositors at SVB would have access to their funds, even those in excess of the standard FDIC insurance limits, under a systemic risk exception. As of March 10, 2023, we maintained cash in deposit accounts at SVB in excess of the standard FDIC insured amount and a substantial majority of our cash equivalents was invested, through a cash sweep arrangement with SVB, which are invested in a variety of short-term and high-credit bonds and other liquid investments. Although the FDIC ultimately announced that it would pay all deposits, including deposits that exceeded FDIC-insured amounts, we and other SVB customers initially were not able to access our accounts and faced significant uncertainty about whether and when we would be able to fully access amounts held through SVB, which would have had several follow-on consequences with respect to our ability to meet our near-term payment obligations. According to our cash sweep arrangements, we believe we should be recognized by the FDIC as the owner of such assets in the event of such financial institutions’ failure, such as the March 10, 2023 closure of SVB. While we have regained access to our funds at SVB, we have made and are making arrangements to open new and additional accounts with, and to transfer cash, cash equivalents and investments to such other financial institutions. We also continue to make arrangements to expand and evaluate our banking relationships in an effort to diversify as we believe necessary or appropriate. Additionally, we could experience disruption with customer receivables and vendor payments as we transition to new accounts.

Despite our proactive measures and the measures taken by the United States federal government, there is uncertainty in the markets regarding the stability of banks and the safety of deposits in excess of the insured deposit limits. The ultimate outcome of these events, and whether further regulatory actions will be taken, cannot be predicted. If any parties with whom we conduct business are impacted by the closure of SVB or any other financial institution, such parties’ ability to pay their obligations to us or to enter into new commercial arrangements requiring additional payments to us could be adversely affected. In this regard, counterparties to SVB credit agreements and arrangements, and third parties such as beneficiaries of letters of credit (among others), may experience direct impacts from the closure of SVB and uncertainty remains over liquidity concerns in the broader financial services industry.

In addition, if any of our partners, customers, suppliers or other parties with whom we conduct business are unable to access their own funds or access liquidity pursuant to credit agreements, letters or credit or other such lending arrangements or financial instruments as a result of financial institution volatility, such parties’ ability to pay their obligations to us or to enter into new commercial arrangements requiring additional payments to us could be adversely affected, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial condition and results or operations. Similar impacts have occurred in the past, such as during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.

18

Further, these events may make equity or debt financing more difficult to obtain, and additional equity or debt financing might not be available on reasonable terms, if at all; difficulties obtaining equity or debt financing could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, as well as our ability to continue to grow our operations.

We are subject to risks from legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries, including a number of recent legal proceedings and investigations, which have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, and could result in additional claims and material liabilities.

We are currently subject to a number of legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries, including: (i) purported securities class action litigation alleging that certain of our disclosures about our business, operations and prospects, including reimbursement from third-party payors, violated federal securities laws; and (ii) purported derivative action alleging the directors breached their fiduciary duties by allegedly failing to implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls related to the Company’s financial reporting, public disclosures, and compliance with laws, rules and regulations governing the business. On April 29, 2022, we entered into a civil settlement agreement with the U.S. government that resolved the DOJ investigation and pursuant to which we paid approximately $34.4 million. We remain subject to audit or prepayment review by various third-party payors. In addition, we could face additional legal proceedings, investigations, and inquiries relating to these or similar matters. For more information regarding legal proceedings, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”

We are unable to predict how long such legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries will continue, but we have incurred and anticipate that we will continue to incur significant costs in connection with these matters and that these legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries have resulted and will continue to result in substantial distraction of management’s time, regardless of the outcome. These legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries may result in damages, fines, penalties, consent orders or other sanctions (including exclusion from government programs and/or a recoupment of previous claims paid) against us and/or certain of our officers or directors, or in changes to our business practices, including the potential long-term shift to a primarily “cash-pay” model, with minimal volume from our customers using insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to Eargo. Furthermore, publicity surrounding these legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries or any enforcement action as a result thereof, even if ultimately resolved favorably for us, coupled with the recent intensified public scrutiny of our Company, could result in additional legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries. As a result, these legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

These legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries, and the uncertainty stemming from them, could also precipitate or heighten the other Risk Factors that we identify in this Item 1A, any of which could materially adversely impact our business. Further, these legal proceedings, investigations and inquiries may also affect our business and financial results in a manner that is not presently known to us or that we currently do not consider to present significant risks to our operations.

Additionally, we may become subject to other legal disputes and regulatory proceedings in connection with our business activities involving, among other things, product liability, product defects, intellectual property infringement and/or alleged violations of applicable laws in various jurisdictions. Although we maintain liability insurance in amounts we believe to be consistent with industry practice, we may not be fully insured against all potential damages that may arise out of any claims to which we may be party in the ordinary course of our business. A negative outcome of these proceedings may prevent us from pursuing certain activities and/or require us to incur additional costs in order to do so and pay damages.

The outcome of pending or potential future legal and arbitration proceedings is difficult to predict with certainty. In the event of a negative outcome of any material legal or arbitration proceeding, whether based on a judgment or a settlement agreement, we could be obligated to make substantial payments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the costs related to litigation and arbitration proceedings may be significant, and any legal or arbitration proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have a limited operating history and have grown significantly in a short period of time. If we are unable to manage our business and anticipated growth effectively, our business and growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

We were organized in 2010 and began selling hearing aids in 2015. In that time, we have grown significantly, increasing the size of our organization and expanding our business. We have expanded, and any growth that we experience in the future will require us to further expand, our sales, clinical, and research and development personnel (including those with software and hardware expertise), our manufacturing operations and our general and administrative infrastructure. As a public company, we need to support increased managerial, operational, financial and other resources. Rapid expansion in personnel could mean that less experienced people develop, market and sell our products, which could result in inefficiencies and unanticipated costs, reduced quality and disruptions to our operations. In addition, rapid and significant growth may strain our administrative and operational infrastructure.

The challenges we face in managing our business, including our potential long-term shift to a primarily “cash-pay” business model, the obstacles to our being able to obtain reimbursement for our products from third-party payors, and the changing regulatory landscape, place significant demands on our management, financial, operational, technological and other resources, and we expect that managing our business will continue to place significant demands on our management and other resources and will require us to

19

continue developing and improving our operational, financial and other internal controls, reporting systems and procedures. In particular, the challenges in managing our business involve a number of areas, including recruiting and retaining sufficient skilled personnel, providing adequate training and supervision to maintain our high-quality product standards and regulatory compliance and preserving our culture and values. We may not be able to address these challenges in a cost-effective manner, or at all. In addition, we completed employee workforce reductions in the fourth quarter of 2021 and second quarter of 2022, which actions may continue to impact the attraction and retention of employees, as well as employee morale and productivity. We cannot assure you that any increases in scale, related improvements and quality or compliance assurance will be successfully implemented or that appropriate personnel will be available to facilitate the management and growth of our business. Failure to implement necessary procedures, transition to new processes or hire the necessary personnel could result in higher costs or an inability to meet demand. If we do not effectively manage our business through the various challenges we face, we may not be able to execute on our business plan, respond to competitive pressures, take advantage of market opportunities, satisfy customer requirements or maintain high-quality product offerings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to attract and retain senior management and key technology personnel, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, administrative and clinical and scientific personnel, including those with software and hardware expertise. We are highly dependent upon our senior management, particularly our President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as our senior technology personnel and other members of our senior management team. The unplanned loss of the services of any of our members of senior management could adversely affect our business until a suitable replacement can be found.

Competition for qualified personnel in the medical device field in general and the audiology field specifically is intense due to the limited number of individuals who possess the training, skills and experience required by our industry. In addition, our success also depends on our ability to attract, recruit, develop and retain skilled managerial, sales, administration, operating and technical personnel. We intend to continue to review and, where necessary, strengthen our senior management as the needs of the business develop, including through internal promotion and external hires. However, there may be a limited number of persons with the requisite competencies to serve in these positions and we cannot assure you that we would be able to locate or employ such qualified personnel on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Therefore, the unplanned loss of one or more of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain additional key personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to attract and retain such qualified personnel has been and may continue to be negatively impacted by the DOJ investigation or shareholder litigation, our recent workforce reductions and suspension of certain of our equity compensation practices, and related negative publicity. In addition, to the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited or that they have divulged proprietary or other confidential information, or that their former employers own their research output.

We may experience difficulties in managing our business, and a deterioration in our relationships with our employees could have an adverse impact on our business.

We expect to rely on our managerial, operational, finance and other resources in order to manage our operations and continue our research and development activities. We may expand our international operations, which would subject us to the legal, political, regulatory and social requirements and economic conditions of these jurisdictions, and create a variety of potential operational challenges due to a variety of international factors, including local labor laws and regulations and managing a geographically dispersed workforce. Our management and personnel, systems and facilities currently in place may not be adequate to support our business. Our need to effectively execute our strategy requires that we:

Maintaining good relationships with our employees is crucial to our operations. As a result, any deterioration of the relationships with our employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, and foster positive employee morale, has been and may continue to be negatively impacted by the DOJ investigation and related negative publicity as well as the suspension of certain of our equity compensation practices. In addition, we completed employee workforce reductions in the fourth quarter of 2021 and second quarter of 2022, which actions may impact the attraction and retention of employees, as well as employee morale and productivity. Further, many of our key employees receive a total compensation package that includes equity awards. In addition to the aforementioned suspension of certain equity compensation

20

practices, volatility in the stock market, our share price and other factors could diminish the Company’s use or the value of the Company’s equity awards, putting the Company at a competitive disadvantage.

Additionally, material disruption to our business as a result of strikes, work stoppages or other labor disputes could disrupt our operations, result in a loss of reputation, increased wages and benefits or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have a history of net losses, and we expect to incur additional substantial losses in the foreseeable future.

We have incurred net losses since inception, and we expect to incur additional substantial losses in the foreseeable future. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we incurred net losses of $157.5 million and $157.8 million, respectively. As a result of our ongoing losses, as of December 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $514.3 million. Since inception, we have spent significant funds on organizational and start-up activities, to recruit key managers and employees, to develop our hearing aids, to develop our manufacturing know-how and customer support resources and for research and development.

The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2022, net losses increased in part as a result of the costs involved in resolving the DOJ investigation, including the approximately $34.4 million we paid pursuant to the settlement agreement with the U.S. government, and other corrective actions and recoupment of previous claims paid, as well as other legal proceedings, and their duration and impact on our business generally. Net losses may also fluctuate and increase as a result of the implementation of the FDA’s new OTC hearing aid regulatory framework and any potential Medicare coverage for certain hearing aids, neither of which may ultimately be favorable to us.

Our long-term success is dependent upon our ability to successfully develop, commercialize and market our products, earn revenue, obtain additional capital when needed and, ultimately, to achieve profitable operations. The uncertainty regarding the extent to which we are able to validate and establish additional processes to support the submission of claims for reimbursement to health plans, including those under the FEHB program, the implementation of the FDA’s new OTC hearing aid regulatory framework (which may lead insurance providers to take actions limiting our ability to access insurance coverage) and potential insurance (including Medicare) coverage for certain hearing aids (which may not include Eargo hearing aids) will require that we evaluate and consider any changes to our business model as new information becomes available, including a potential long-term shift to a primarily “cash-pay” model, with minimal volume from our customers using insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to Eargo, which would likely result in a sustained increased cost of customer acquisition and a reduction in shipments, revenue, gross margin and higher operating expenses, which could have a material negative impact on our ability to achieve profitability and our growth prospects. We will need to generate significant additional revenue and raise significant additional capital to continue our operations and potentially achieve profitability. It is possible that even if we generate significant additional revenue and raise significant additional capital, we will not achieve profitability or that, even if we do achieve profitability, we may not maintain or increase profitability in the future. Without the benefit of customers with insurance coverage and significant additional capital, the future prospects of the Company and our ability to achieve profitability are uncertain.

Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer and omni-channel business models and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products.

On August 17, 2022, the FDA published a final rule to establish new regulatory categories for OTC and prescription hearing aids (the “OTC Final Rule”). The OTC Final Rule implements relevant provisions of the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (“FDARA”), which set forth requirements for the FDA to create a new category of OTC hearing aids that are intended to be available without supervision, prescription, or other order, involvement or intervention of a licensed practitioner. Prior to the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, no OTC category of hearing aids existed. Following publication of a proposed rule in October 2021, the FDA issued its OTC Final Rule with requirements for labelling, conditions of sale, performance standards, design requirements and other provisions under which manufacturers may elect to market hearing aids as either OTC or prescription devices, or both. In addition, under FDARA, the OTC hearing aid controls promulgated in the OTC Final Rule preempt any state or local requirement specifically related to hearing products that would restrict or interfere with commercial activity involving OTC hearing aids. The OTC Final Rule became effective on October 17, 2022, although certain previously marketed devices have until April 14, 2023 to come into compliance with the OTC Final Rule.

We have marketed in the past, and continue to market, certain Eargo system devices as Class I air-conduction or Class II wireless air-conduction hearing aids under existing regulations at 21 CFR 874.330 and 874.3305, respectively, both of which are exempt from 510(k) premarket review. In addition, in June 2022, we submitted a 510(k) premarket notification seeking FDA clearance of expanded labelling for our Eargo 5 and 6 hearing aids under the “self-fitting” regulation at 21 CFR 874.3325. We received FDA 510(k) clearance for Eargo 5 and 6 as Class II self-fitting air-conduction hearing aids in December 2022 and, in January 2023, we launched the Eargo 7 as our third over-the-counter, 510(k) cleared self-fitting device. We plan to market our devices as OTC hearing aids and intend to comply with all applicable OTC regulatory requirements by the compliance date for currently marketed devices on April 14, 2023, or sooner. In addition, we may seek to market certain devices as prescription hearing aids, which would require compliance with separate physical and electronic labeling requirements under the OTC Final Rule. If the FDA were to determine that our devices do

21

not satisfy the requirements of the OTC Final Rule, we could be forced to cease distribution of our products, and we could be subject to additional enforcement action by the FDA.

We have expended, and we will continue to expend, significant time and resources evaluating the OTC Final Rule and ensuring that our devices and processes comply with the new requirements in order to market our products in line with our primary direct-to-consumer and omni-channel business models. It is possible that the OTC Final Rule may lead to additional commercial partnership, omni-channel, including retail, or other opportunities, although there are no assurances that it will do so. The OTC Final Rule and the responses thereto by leading insurance providers could also materially impact our efforts to resume submitting claims for customers with potential insurance benefits or have other unforeseen impacts on our business and results of operations.

Finally, in October 2021, the Biden administration outlined its plan to expand government healthcare programs as part of its broader domestic spending bill, which includes, among other things, extending Medicare coverage to include hearing benefits. Congress has considered legislation that would provide for such coverage, for example, the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376), which was passed by the House on November 19, 2021. The bill, as passed by the House, would have provided Medicare coverage for certain hearing aids to individuals with specific types of hearing loss, furnished pursuant to a written order of a physician, qualified audiologist or other hearing aid professional, physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist. The Inflation Reduction Act, which was ultimately signed into law, however, did not include a hearing aid benefit. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature, or extent to which Medicare or other government healthcare programs will cover hearing aids, if at all, or specifically our hearing aids, which are intended for “mild” or “moderate” hearing loss, in the future, or the impact of any such changes on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

If we cannot innovate at the pace of our hearing aid manufacturing competitors, we may not be able to develop or exploit new technologies in time to remain competitive.

The hearing aid industry has in the past experienced rapid shifts to new key technologies, including for example the switch from analog to digital hearing aids in the 1990s, that disrupted existing market patterns and led to a large-scale market realignment among customers and hearing aid manufacturers. For us to remain competitive, it is essential to develop and bring to market new technologies or to find new applications for existing technologies at an increasing speed. If we are unable to meet customer demands for new technology, or if the technologies we introduce are viewed less favorably than our competitors’ products, our results of operations and future prospects may be negatively affected. To meet our customers’ needs in these areas, we must continuously design new products, update existing products and invest in and develop new technologies. We will also need to anticipate consumer demand with respect to these technologies and which technological advances are most desirable in the hearing aids we sell. This need will result in requiring our employees to continue learning and adapting to new technologies, and our competing for highly skilled talent in a competitive market. Our operating results depend to a significant extent on our ability to anticipate and adapt to technological changes in the hearing aid market, maintain innovation, maintain a strong product pipeline and reduce the costs of producing high-quality new and existing hearing aids. Any inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As we expand our product offerings to physical retail outlets and begin to rely on third parties outside of our control, any failure of such third parties to comply with applicable laws and regulations could negatively impact our brand image and business and lead to negative publicity and potential liability.

As we expand our product offerings to physical retail outlets, we must rely on third parties to comply with applicable regulatory requirements in the promotion and sale of our devices. These third-party retailers may have limited or no experience selling regulated products such as hearing aids. If our third-party retail partners fail to comply with applicable requirements, our operations could be disrupted and we may be required to contract with alternate retail partners, which could result in substantial delays and which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial conditions, results of operations and growth prospects. Any violation of applicable law by any retail partner could expose us to unforeseen potential liability or attract negative publicity for us and our brand, which could materially impact our business. In addition, our retail partners have limited experience marketing and selling hearing aids in retail settings. If they are unable to successfully market and sell our hearing aids, we or they may decide to terminate our partnerships, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial conditions, results of operations and growth prospects.

We are deploying a new business model in an effort to disrupt a relatively mature industry. In order to successfully challenge incumbent business models and become profitable, we will need to continue to refine our product and strategy.

Our primary direct-to-consumer and omni-channel business model is relatively new to the hearing aid industry. Our products are currently primarily available direct-to-consumer and are therefore generally not sold by channels which consumers would traditionally look to for the treatment of their hearing loss. Because audiologists and hearing clinics do not offer our products, they are unlikely to recommend our products to their patients. If we are unable to reach this population through our online or direct and channel marketing, the estimated market size for our products may be lower than we anticipate.

Additionally, following the effective date of the OTC Final Rule on October 17, 2022, customers can now purchase or order Eargo hearing aids in certain physical retail settings. We believe that the OTC Final Rule may facilitate the opportunity to execute additional

22

commercial partnerships and expand our potential customers’ opportunity to purchase our products at physical retail locations. Delivery of hearing aids via direct-to-consumer and retail models represents a change from the traditional channel, which requires in-person visits to one or more hearing care professionals, and consumers may be reluctant to accept these models or may not find it preferable to the traditional channel. In addition, consumers may not respond to our direct and channel marketing campaigns or efforts, or we may be unsuccessful in reaching our target audience, particularly if we expand our sales efforts in foreign jurisdictions where our advertising and distribution model may be more heavily regulated. If consumers prove unwilling to adopt our model as rapidly or in the numbers that we anticipate, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially harmed.

Historically, the majority of hearing aids sold to customers who used insurance benefits as a method of direct payment to Eargo corresponded to claims for reimbursement to third-party payors under the FEHB program. While we are continuing to work with applicable third-party payors with the objective of validating and establishing additional processes to support claims that we may submit for reimbursement, we may not be able to arrive at additional acceptable processes or submit future claims in sufficient volume to meaningfully restore or expand our insurance-based business. As such, our future growth prospects may be dependent upon other opportunities, such as the OTC Final Rule and any potential insurance coverage for certain hearing aids that we may be able to access.

We operate in a highly competitive industry, and competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The worldwide market for hearing aids is competitive in terms of pricing, product quality, product innovation and time-to-market. We face strong competitors, which have greater resources and stronger financial profiles that may enable them to better exploit changes in our industry on a cost-competitive basis and to be more effective and faster in capturing available market opportunities, which in turn may negatively impact our market share. There are five major traditional manufacturer competitors in the industry—GN Store Nord, Sonova, Starkey, William Demant and WS Audiology—who together control a significant majority of the hearing aid market.

In addition to these manufacturer competitors, Costco sells multiple brands of hearing aids, including those of the traditional manufacturers and Costco’s own white-label Kirkland Signature brand of hearing aid, at various price points. We estimate that during 2019, Costco dispensed approximately 14% of the hearing aids distributed in the United States, which percentage is expected to increase going forward. The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (the “VA”) is also a significant provider of hearing aids and provides hearing aids at no charge to its patients. We estimate that, in 2022, the VA dispensed approximately 20% of the hearing aids distributed in the United States. Our products are not distributed by Costco, or on contract or currently eligible to be distributed by the VA.

We also face competition from other direct-to-consumer hearing aid providers. Similar to our business model, these hearing aid companies allow consumers to purchase hearing aids remotely, with no need to visit a clinic, and they also provide remote support. Given the similarities in our direct-to-consumer business model to these providers, if potential consumers opt to buy their hearing aids from these direct-to-consumer competitors, our business could be adversely affected.

Finally, in particular following the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, we may also face increased competition from companies that introduce new technologies, including consumer electronics companies that sell direct to consumers or other hearing aid companies that partner with other retailers or consumer electronics companies. For example, in May 2018, the FDA granted marketing clearance to Bose Corporation for a “self-fitting air-conduction hearing aid,” and following the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, Nuheara will be selling its OTC self-fitting air-conduction hearing aids under branding by HP, Inc., while Sony Electronics has partnered with WS Audiology. The Bose self-fitting hearing aid was cleared under the FDA’s de novo premarket review pathway with the intended use to amplify sound for individuals 18 years of age or older with perceived mild to moderate hearing impairment, with no pre-programming or hearing test necessary. We view our consumer-first model as a competitive advantage, and competitors, including Bose or other consumer electronics companies, or any other companies following the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, that sell hearing aids directly to consumers or in partnership with other retailers may erode that advantage. Please see the Risk Factor titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer business model and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products.”

We may be unable to compete with these or other competitors, and one or more of such competitors may render our technology obsolete or economically unattractive. Please see the Risk Factor titled, “If we cannot innovate at the pace of our hearing aid manufacturing competitors, we may not be able to develop or exploit new technologies in time to remain competitive.” To the extent we expand internationally, we will face additional competition in geographies outside the United States. If we are unable to compete effectively with existing products or respond effectively to any new products developed by competitors, our business could be materially harmed. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors or that competitive pressures will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

23

We rely on the timely supply of high-quality components, parts and finished products, and our business could suffer if suppliers or manufacturers are unable to procure raw materials or other components of an acceptable quality (or at all) or otherwise fail to meet their delivery obligations, raise prices or cease to supply us with components, parts or products of acceptable quality.

We rely on a limited number of critical suppliers for many of the components that are used in the manufacture of our products, including for semiconductor components, such as integrated circuits, as well as batteries, microphones and receivers. We are dependent on these third-party manufacturers and suppliers to identify and purchase quality raw materials, semi-finished goods and finished goods while seeking to preserve our quality standards. This reliance and dependence on third parties adds additional risks to the manufacturing process that are beyond our control. For example, the occurrence of epidemics or pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may cause labor shortages and/or disrupt the supply of various raw materials and components, causing price spikes and/or shortages. As a result, one or more of our suppliers or manufacturers may suspend, close or otherwise reduce the scope of their operations either temporarily or permanently. In addition, reductions in our supplier volume due to demand or product changes may lead and has led suppliers to raise volume requirements, increase their pricing, levy minimum purchase requirements, revise terms of payment, or otherwise reduce or cease the scope of their supplier relationship with us.

In addition, many of these suppliers also provide components and products to our competitors. The industry’s reliance on a limited number of key components and product suppliers subjects us to the risk that in the event of an increase in demand or shortage of key materials or components, our suppliers may fail to provide supplies to us in a timely manner while they continue to supply our competitors, many of which have greater purchasing power than us, or seek to supply components to us at a higher cost. Lead times for materials, components and products ordered by us or by our contract manufacturers can vary significantly and depend on factors such as contract terms, demand for a component, and supplier capacity. From time to time, we may experience and have experienced component shortages and extended lead times, as well as increased component costs and increased logistics costs, including on semiconductor components and batteries, and other components used in our products.

For example, we have at times experienced, and expect to continue to periodically experience, price increases in certain of our critical components due to commodity price inflation. Additionally, while we have taken certain steps to alleviate cost pressures on freight shipping of our components and products, logistics costs may continue to increase and there can be no assurance that our cost-saving measures will continue to offset such logistics price increases. While we continue to monitor our supply chain and have taken and are taking actions to address limited supply and increasing lead times, including outreach to critical suppliers and spot market purchases, future disruptions in our supply chain, including the sourcing of certain components and raw materials by us or our suppliers, such as semiconductor and memory chips, as well as increased logistics and inflationary costs, could impact our sales and gross margins as well as launch and shipment of our products. The failure of our suppliers or manufacturers to deliver components or products in a timely fashion could have disruptive effects on our ability to produce our products in a timely manner, or we may be required to find new suppliers or manufacturers at an increased cost, or we may be unable to find replacement suppliers or manufacturers at all. Shortages or interruptions in the supply of components or subcontracted products, or our inability to procure these components or products from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner, could delay launch or shipment of our products or increase our production costs, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. The effects of climate change, including extreme weather events, long-term changes in temperature levels and water availability may exacerbate these risks. Such disruption has in the past impacted our costs and could in the future impact costs or interrupt our ability to source certain product components. A severe weather event in countries from which we source components and parts could cause disruptions in our supply chain which could, in turn, cause product shortages, delays in delivery and/or increases in our cost incurred to manufacture our products.

Any shortage, delay or interruption in the availability of our products, or key inputs used in their production, may negatively affect our ability to meet consumer demand. Additionally, our reputation and the quality of our products are in part dependent on the quality of the components that we source from third-party suppliers. If we are unable to control the quality of the components supplied to us or to address known quality problems in a timely manner, our reputation in the market may be damaged and sales of our products may suffer. As a result, we may experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain components needed to manufacture our hearing aids are only available from a limited number of suppliers.

Several of our suppliers provide products for our hearing aids and accessories for which they own the design and/or intellectual property rights. This includes semiconductor components, including integrated circuits, as well as transducers, batteries and various electrical components, some of which are highly customized. Although there may be several potential suppliers for our components, as our components are highly customized, there is a risk that these components may not be readily substituted by similar products of other suppliers or that any substitution may take a lengthy period of time to implement. Even if we do identify new suppliers, we may experience increased costs and product shortages as we transition to alternative suppliers. If any of these limited suppliers cease to supply us with their products, significantly increase their costs, or any of the foregoing events occurs, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on a limited number of manufacturers for the assembly of our hearing aids. If we encounter manufacturing problems or delays, we may be unable to promptly transition to alternative manufacturers and our ability to generate revenue will be limited.

24

We have no manufacturing capabilities of our own. We currently rely on a limited number of manufacturers: one located in Thailand, Hana Microelectronics, and our primary manufacturer, Pegatron Corporation, headquartered in Taiwan and with manufacturing facilities throughout Asia. Pegatron manufactures the Eargo 5, Eargo 6, and Eargo 7 hearing aid systems out of its facilities in Suzhou, China. For us to be successful, our contract manufacturers must be able to provide us with products in substantial quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis. While our existing manufacturers have generally met our demand and cost requirements on a timely basis in the past, their ability and willingness to continue to do so going forward may be limited for several reasons, including the volume of our orders and our relative importance as a customer of the manufacturer or its ability to provide assembly services to manufacture our products, which may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and potential geopolitical events involving the countries in which our manufacturers are headquartered or operate. Please see the risk factor titled, “We are dependent on international manufacturers and suppliers, as well as certain international contractors we engage from time to time with respect to select research and development activities, which exposes us to foreign operational and political risks that may harm our business.” An interruption in our commercial operations could occur if we encounter delays or difficulties in securing these manufactured products if we cannot obtain an acceptable substitute.

Any transition to a new contract manufacturer, or any transition of products between existing manufacturers, could be time-consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions in our operations and product delivery, could affect the performance specifications of our products or could require that we modify the design of our products. We will be required to verify that any new manufacturer maintains facilities, procedures and operations that comply with our quality and applicable regulatory requirements, which could further impede our ability to manufacture our products in a timely manner. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and engage alternative or additional contract manufacturers on similar terms or without delay. Furthermore, our contract manufacturers could require us to move to a different production facility. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our ability to meet the demand for our products in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The manufacture of our products is complex and requires the integration of a number of components from several sources of supply. Our contract manufacturers must manufacture and assemble these complex products in commercial quantities in compliance with regulatory requirements and at an acceptable cost. Our hearing aids require significant expertise to manufacture, and our contract manufacturers may encounter difficulties in scaling up production of the hearing aids, including problems with quality control and assurance, component supply shortages, including any semiconductor components, increased costs, shortages of qualified personnel, the long lead time required to develop additional facilities for purposes of testing our products and/or difficulties associated with compliance with local, state, federal and foreign regulatory requirements. There can be no assurance that manufacturing or quality control problems will not arise in connection with the scale-up of the manufacture of our products. If we are unable to obtain a sufficient supply of product, maintain control over product quality and cost or otherwise adapt to challenges in managing our business, we may not have the capability to satisfy market demand, and our business and reputation in the marketplace will suffer. If demand for our products decreases, as it has in the past year as a result of the DOJ investigation and claims audits (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits”), we may have excess inventory, which could result in inventory write-offs that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, reductions in our supplier volume due to demand or product changes may lead and has led suppliers to raise volume requirements, increase their pricing, levy minimum purchase requirements, revise terms of payment, or otherwise reduce or cease the scope of their supplier relationship with us. We may also encounter defects in materials and/or workmanship, which could lead to a failure to adhere to regulatory requirements. Any defects could delay operations at our contract manufacturers’ facilities, lead to regulatory fines or halt or discontinue manufacturing indefinitely. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to successfully develop and effectively manage the introduction of new products, our business may be adversely affected.

We must successfully manage introductions of new or advanced hearing aid products. Introductions of new or advanced hearing aid products could also adversely impact the sales of our existing products to consumers. For instance, the introduction or announcement of new or advanced hearing aid products may shorten the life cycle of our existing devices or reduce demand, thereby reducing any benefits of successful hearing aid introductions and potentially lead to challenges in managing write-downs or write-offs of inventory of existing products. We may also not have success in transitioning customers from legacy hearing aids to new products. In addition, new hearing aid products may have higher manufacturing costs than legacy products, which could negatively impact our gross margins and operating results. As the technological complexity of our products increases, the infrastructure to support our products, such as our design and manufacturing processes and technical support for our products, may also become more complex. Accordingly, if we fail to effectively manage introductions of new or advanced products, our business may be adversely affected.

We experience challenges managing the inventory of existing hearing aids, which can lead to excess inventory and discounting of our existing devices. Inventory levels in excess of consumer demand may result in inventory write-downs or write-offs and the sale of inventory at discounted prices, which has affected our gross margin and could impair the strength of our brand. Reserves and write-downs for rebates, promotions and excess inventory are recorded based on our forecast of future demand. Actual future demand could

25

be less than our forecast, which may result in additional reserves and write-downs in the future, or actual demand could be stronger than our forecast, which may result in a reduction to previously recorded reserves and write-downs in the future and increase the volatility of our operating results.

If the quality of our hearing aid products does not meet consumer expectations, or if our products wear out more quickly than expected, then our brand and reputation or our business could be adversely affected.

Our products may not perform as well in day-to-day use as we or our customers expect. Although we designed our Eargo hearing aids to provide high quality audio, we have collected limited data comparing our products to competitive devices. In September 2021, we conducted a series of comparative electroacoustic benchmarking tests (the “Bench Study”) to compare our Eargo Neo HiFi and Eargo 5 hearing aids with hearing aids from four major manufacturers. While each of the devices tested in the Bench Study, including our Eargo Neo HiFi and Eargo 5 hearing aids, met or exceeded the identified benchmarks for appropriate levels of sound quality and amplification to improve speech audibility, the design, methodology and results of the Bench Study have not been subject to external review and may not be reliable or replicable indicators of the general performance of our Eargo Neo HiFi and Eargo 5 hearing aids or the other manufacturers’ hearing aids that were the subject of the Bench Study. Further, the benchmarks for appropriate levels of sound quality and amplification that we identified in the Bench Study may not be appropriate proxies for hearing aid performance or reflect the real-world performance of any tested device. Future studies, including our internal studies or those of our competitors or other third parties, may not yield the results that we expect to obtain and may not demonstrate that our products are superior to, or may demonstrate that our products are inferior to, existing or future products with regard to functional or economic measures. These study results may be published in medical journals or other publications, or by our competitors and result in adverse publicity for our products. The performance of our Eargo hearing aids may not live up to customer expectations, and our brand, reputation, customer satisfaction, return rates and sales may be adversely affected as a result.

Furthermore, because of our products’ limited time in the market, we cannot be certain about the usable life of our products. Due to the design constraints applicable to our rechargeable, in-the-canal design, our hearing aids may offer a shorter usable life compared to our competitors’ hearing aids. Thus, even though our products may be more affordable than competitive devices, they may need to be replaced more often. Although we believe the advantages of our design justify this tradeoff, customers may expect a longer useful life, and failure to live up to this expectation could result in reduced sales, decreased customer loyalty, higher-than-expected warranty claims and adverse publicity.

Certain components of our hearing aids may also offer reduced performance or wear out over time. For example, the rechargeable technology used in our hearing aids and charging cases has a limited lifespan, and recharging performance will degrade over time. We designed our Eargo Neo HiFi hearing aids to provide up to 20 hours of continuous use between charges when new and up to 16 hours after 1,000 charging cycles, but charging capacity may decrease more quickly than expected. Moreover, certain components of our hearing aids that can be purchased online, such as the hearing aid tips, will require more frequent replacement than the device itself. If the quality, longevity and durability of our products does not meet the expectations of customers, then our brand and reputation and our business, financial condition and results of operations, could be adversely affected.

Customer or third-party complaints or negative reviews or publicity about our company or our hearing aids could harm our reputation and brand.

We are heavily dependent on customers who use our hearing aids to provide good reviews and word-of-mouth recommendations to contribute to our reputation and brand. Customers who are dissatisfied with their experiences with our products or services or their ability to receive reimbursement from their insurance companies may post negative reviews. We have been and may continue to be the subject of blog, forum or other media postings that include inaccurate statements and create negative publicity. In addition, traditional hearing aid supply chain participants may express and publish negative views regarding our direct-to-consumer and omni-channel models and products. Any negative reviews or negative publicity, including in relation to the DOJ investigation, the claims audits, and other legal proceedings have harmed and could continue to harm our reputation and brand and severely diminish consumer confidence in our products. Please also see the Risk Factor titled, “We are subject to risks from legal proceedings, investigations, and inquiries, including a number of recent legal proceedings and investigations, which have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, and could result in additional claims and material liabilities.”

We spend significant amounts on advertising and other marketing campaigns to acquire new customers, which may not be successful or cost effective.

We market our hearing aids through a mix of digital and traditional marketing channels. These include paid search, digital display advertising, email marketing, affiliate and channel marketing, direct response television, national reach television, direct mail and select print and radio advertising. We also leverage our database of prospects and customers to further drive customer acquisition and referrals. We spend significant amounts on advertising and other marketing campaigns to acquire new customers, and we expect to continue to spend significant amounts to acquire new customers and increase awareness of our products. Beginning on December 8, 2021, we temporarily stopped accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment. As a result, we have reduced sales and

26

marketing resources that were previously focused on insurance customers to prioritize the conversion of cash-pay consumers into satisfied customers. The shift to a primarily “cash-pay” model has increased the cost to acquire new customers, based on the historically lower conversion rate for cash-pay customers as compared to customers with potential insurance benefits. This shift to a primarily “cash-pay” model may be reinforced by the new OTC regulatory framework if our products are marketed as OTC hearing aids, which may not be covered under certain plans even if medical necessity is otherwise established. While we seek to structure our marketing campaigns in the manner that we believe is most likely to encourage consumers to use our products while lowering our acquisition costs, we may fail to identify marketing opportunities that satisfy our anticipated return on marketing spend as we scale our investments in marketing, accurately predict customer acquisition or fully understand or estimate the conditions and behaviors that drive consumer behavior. If any of our marketing campaigns prove less successful than anticipated in attracting new customers, we may not be able to recover our marketing spend, and our rate of customer acquisition may fail to meet market expectations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our marketing efforts will result in increased sales of our products.

In addition, we believe that building a strong brand and developing and achieving broad awareness of our brand is critical to achieving market success. Negative publicity, including in relation to the DOJ investigation, the claims audits, and other legal proceedings has harmed and could continue to harm our reputation and brand and severely diminish consumer confidence in our products. If any of our brand-building activities prove less successful than anticipated, or such activities are inhibited by negative publicity in relation to the DOJ investigation, the claims audits and other legal proceedings, it could materially adversely impact our ability to attract new customers. If this were to occur, we may not be able to recover our brand-building spend, and our rate of customer acquisition may fail to meet market expectations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our brand-building efforts will result in increased sales of our products. See also the Risk Factors titled, “Customer or third-party complaints or negative reviews or publicity about our company or our hearing aids could harm our reputation and brand” and “We are subject to risks from legal proceedings, investigations, and inquiries, including a number of recent legal proceedings and investigations, which have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, and could result in additional claims and material liabilities.”

Our products are complex to design and manufacture and could contain defects. The production and sale of defective products could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If product liability lawsuits are brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of our products.

We make hearing aids that include highly complex electronic components, which are sourced from external third parties, and there is an inherent risk that defects may occur in the production of any of our products. Although we rely on the suppliers’ internal procedures designed to minimize risks that may arise from quality issues, there can be no assurance that we or our suppliers will be able to eliminate or mitigate occurrences of these issues and associated liabilities. Under consumer product legislation in many jurisdictions, we may be forced to recall or repurchase defective products, and more restrictive laws and regulations relating to these matters may be adopted in the future. We also face exposure to product liability claims in the event that any of our devices are alleged to have resulted in personal injury or damage to property, or otherwise to have caused harm. For example, we may be sued if any of our hearing aids allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranty. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our products. Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

Our inability to obtain and maintain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost and scope of coverage to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the sale of our current or any future products we develop. Although we currently carry product liability insurance, any claim that may be brought against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance or that is in excess of the limits of our insurance coverage. Our

27

insurance policies also have various exclusions and deductibles, and we may be subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. We will have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that exceed our coverage limitations or that are not covered by our insurance, and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to pay such amounts. Moreover, in the future, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses.

In addition, any product defects, recalls or claims that result in significant adverse publicity could have a negative effect on our reputation, result in loss of market share or failure to achieve market acceptance. For example, our first-generation hearing aid, launched in 2015, had a high incidence of product returns and warranty claims. As a result, we voluntarily withdrew the product from the market. The production and sale of defective products in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to consumer protection laws that regulate our marketing practices and prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could harm our business, and changes in such regulations or laws could require us to modify our products or marketing or advertising efforts.

In connection with the marketing and advertisement of our products, we could be the target of claims relating to false, misleading, deceptive, unfair, or otherwise unsubstantiated or noncompliant advertising or marketing practices, including under the auspices of federal or state rules or regulations such as the Federal Trade Commission Act and state consumer protection statutes. If we rely on third parties, including customers, to provide any marketing or advertising of our products, including as we expand our product offerings in physical retail settings or through online channels, we could be liable for, or face reputational harm as a result of, their practices if, for example, they or we fail to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.

If we are found or perceived to have breached any consumer protection, advertising, unfair competition or other laws or regulations, we may be required to change our business model, products or practices in a manner that may negatively impact us. We could also be subject to regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, litigation (including class actions), fines, penalties, increased compliance or remediation costs, and adverse publicity that could cause reputational harm and loss of customer trust, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There are a variety of hearing aid products and technologies, and consumer confusion about product features and technology could lead consumers to purchase competitive products instead of our products, or to conflate any adverse events or safety issues associated with third-party hearing aid products or other sound enhancement products with our products, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We believe that many individuals do not have full information regarding the types of hearing aids and hearing aid features and technologies available in the market, in part due to the lack of consumer education in the traditional hearing industry sales model. Consumers may not have sufficient information about hearing aids generally or how hearing aid products and technologies compare to each other. This confusion may result in consumers purchasing hearing aids from our competitors instead of our products, even if our hearing aids would provide them with their desired product features. Additionally, there may be confusion in the market following the publication of the OTC Final Rule and the implementation of the new OTC hearing aid regulatory framework, which does not include certain sound enhancement devices (such as personal sound amplification products, or “PSAPs”), because of the increased availability and access to hearing aid devices in similar locations and manners as sound enhancement devices. Our products and trademarks have also been and may continue to be subject to counterfeiting, infringement, or otherwise unauthorized resale. Such actions and other intellectual property infringement could result in consumer confusion, dilute our brand, and otherwise harm our reputation and business. Please see the risk factors titled, “Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology, and if we are unable to obtain, maintain or successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, the commercial value of our products and services will be adversely affected and our competitive position may be harmed” and “If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our competitive position may be harmed.” Any adverse events or safety issues relating to competitive hearing aid products or other non-hearing aid, sound enhancement, or counterfeit devices and related negative publicity, even if such events are not attributable to our products, could result in reduced purchases of hearing aids by consumers generally. Any of these occurrences could lead to reduced sales of our products and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be impacted by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are subject to risks related to public health crises such as the global pandemic associated with COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic may negatively impact our operations and revenues and overall financial condition by harming the ability or willingness of customers to pay for our products due to macro-economic conditions resulting from the pandemic or the operations of manufacturers, suppliers and other third parties with which we do business. These challenges will likely continue for the duration of the pandemic, which is uncertain, and the macro-economic effects of the pandemic will likely continue far beyond the duration of the pandemic.

28

Since the start of the pandemic, numerous state and local jurisdictions have imposed, and others in the future may impose, “shelter-in-place” orders, quarantines, orders requiring non-essential businesses to remain closed, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions for their residents to control the spread of COVID-19. The pandemic and such restrictions have resulted in a majority of our employees working remotely, work stoppages, slowdowns and delays, travel restrictions and cancellation of events, among other effects, thereby negatively impacting our operations. Other potential disruptions may include delays in processing registrations or approvals by applicable state or federal regulatory bodies; delays in product development efforts; disruptions to our supply chain, including any impacts from global semiconductor shortages; and additional government requirements or other incremental mitigation efforts that may further impact our capacity to manufacture, sell and support the use of our Eargo systems.

Disruptions in supply chain have resulted in industry-wide component supply (such as semiconductors) shortages, and we may not be able to obtain adequate inventory on a timely basis or at all. To date, increases in component pricing have occurred but have not had a material impact on supply continuity or gross margin. We have taken steps to monitor our supply chain and actions to address limited supply and increasing lead times, including outreach to critical suppliers and spot market purchases. Future disruptions in our supply chain, including the sourcing of certain components and raw materials, such as semiconductor and memory chips, as well as increased logistics costs, could impact our sales and gross margins.

The ultimate impact of COVID-19 on our business, financial conditions and results of operations depends on many factors and future developments beyond our control, which are highly uncertain and difficult to predict, including: the duration of the pandemic, a potential resurgence, the impact of variants, new or renewed restrictions, the timing, availability, acceptance and effectiveness of vaccines and treatments against COVID-19 as well as vaccination rates among the population, the pace of recovery when the COVID-19 pandemic subsides, and the severity and duration of the global economic downturn that results from the ongoing pandemic.

While the potential economic impact brought by and the duration of COVID-19 may be difficult to assess or predict, the widespread pandemic has resulted in, and may continue to result in, significant disruption of global financial markets, reducing our ability to access capital, which could in the future negatively affect our liquidity. In addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 or other macro-economic factors could materially affect our business and the value of our common stock. The COVID-19 pandemic has also resulted in volatility in the unemployment rate in the United States, which may continue even after the pandemic subsides. The occurrence of any such events may lead to reduced disposable income and access to health insurance, which could adversely affect the number of our products sold after the pandemic has subsided. The ultimate effect of COVID-19 on our sales volume and other results of operations could differ substantially from our expectations and our experience to date.

Repair or replacement costs due to guarantees we provide on our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We provide product guarantees to our customers, both as a result of contractual and legal provisions and for marketing purposes.

We generally allow for the return of products from direct customers within 45 days after the original sale and record estimated sales returns as a reduction of sales in the same period revenue is recognized. We also generally allow customers to return defective or damaged products for a replacement or refund. The term of the warranty provided is typically two years for our latest device and one year for all other devices. Existing and future product guarantees place us at the risk of incurring future repair and/or replacement costs. As of December 31, 2022, we had provisions of approximately $3.8 million relating to warranties. Substantial amounts of product guarantee claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we reserve for the estimated cost of product warranties when revenue is recognized, and we evaluate our warranty reserves periodically by reviewing our warranty repair experience. While we engage in product quality programs and processes, including monitoring and evaluating the quality of our components sourced from our suppliers and instituting methods to remotely detect and correct defects, our warranty obligation is affected by actual product defect rates, parts and equipment costs and service labor costs incurred in correcting a product defect. Our warranty reserves may be inadequate due to undetected product defects, unanticipated component failures or changes in estimates for material, labor and other costs we may incur to replace projected product defects. As a result, if actual product defect rates, parts and equipment costs or service labor costs exceed our estimates, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our failure to successfully anticipate sales returns may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our reported net revenue and net losses are affected by changes in reserves to account for sales returns and product credits. The reserve for sales returns accounts for customer returns of our products after purchase. We record a reserve for sales returns estimated based on historical return trends together with current product sales performance in each reporting period. If actual returns are greater than those projected and reserved for by management, additional sales returns reserve may be recorded in the future and reported net revenue may be reduced accordingly. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits” for more information.

29

We do not currently have the ability to resell all products that are returned. Our refurbishment capabilities are focused on components and allow us to reuse certain key components from our returned devices. To the extent we are unable to successfully refurbish devices in the future, we will not be able to resell such devices. Further, the introduction of new products, changes in product mix, changes in consumer confidence or other competitive and general economic conditions may cause actual returns to differ from product return reserves. Any significant increase in product returns that exceeds our reserves could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to reduce our return rates or if our return rates continue to increase, our net revenue may decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our customer sales returns rate was approximately 34% for the year ended December 31, 2022. Our return policy generally allows our customers to return hearing aids for any reason within the first 45 days of delivery for a full refund, subject to a handling fee in certain states. Additionally, following learning of the DOJ investigation and prior to shifting to our current practice of accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in certain limited circumstances, we offered customers with potential insurance benefits the option to return their hearing aids or purchase their hearing aids without use of their insurance benefits if their claim is denied or ultimately not submitted by us to their insurance plan for payment (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits” for more information).

We report revenue net of expected returns, which is an estimate informed in part by historical return rates. As such, our return rate impacts our reported net revenue and profitability. Our net revenue and profitability have been and will continue to be negatively impacted by the inability to recognize revenue related to shipments to customers with potential insurance benefits, which customers generally have had a significantly lower rate of return as compared to cash-pay customers. As we have shifted to selling on a primarily “cash-pay” basis, we have experienced a significantly higher sales return rate. If actual sales returns differ significantly from our estimates, an adjustment to revenue in the current or subsequent period is recorded. Furthermore, if we are unable to reduce our return rates or if they continue to increase, our net revenue may continue to decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors affecting our business—Sales returns rate.”

Accelerated consolidation and formation of purchasing groups increases the pricing pressure on hearing aids.

Many purchasing groups, such as hearing aid clinics, retailers and hospital systems, are consolidating to create new entities with greater market power. Such groups, such as Costco and the VA, have used and may continue to use their increased purchasing power to negotiate price reductions or other concessions across our industry. This pricing leverage has resulted, and will likely continue to result, in downward pressure on the average selling prices of hearing aid products generally, including our own products. The OTC Final Rule could further contribute to the pace of consolidation as well as the introduction of new entrants in the hearing aid market, which would further increase pricing pressure on hearing aid manufacturers. Please see the Risk Factors titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer and omni-channel business models and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products,” and “As we expand our product offerings to physical retail outlets and begin to rely on third parties outside of our control, any failure of such third parties to use comply with applicable laws and regulations could negatively impact our brand image and business and lead to negative publicity and potential liability.” These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Alternative technologies or therapies that improve or cure hearing loss could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If medical research were to lead to the discovery of alternative therapies or technologies that improve or cure the various forms of hearing loss as an alternative to the hearing aid, such as by surgical techniques, the use of pharmaceuticals or breakthrough bio-technological innovations or therapies, our profitability could suffer through a reduction in sales. The discovery of a cure for the various forms of hearing loss and the development of other alternatives to hearing aids could result in decreased demand for our products and, accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Adapting our production capacities to evolving patterns of demand is expensive, time-consuming and subject to significant uncertainties. We may not be able to adequately predict consumer trends and may be unable to adjust our production in a timely manner. Additionally, as we expand our product offering to physical retail settings, we may not be able to accurately estimate the inventory needs of such physical retail settings.

We market our products directly to consumers in the United States, where we face the risk of significant changes in the demand for our products. If demand decreases, we will need to implement capacity and cost reduction measures involving restructuring costs. If demand increases, we will be required to make capital expenditures related to increased production and expenditures to hire and train production and sales and product support personnel. Adapting to changes in demand inherently lags behind the actual changes because it takes time to identify the change the market is undergoing and to implement any measures taken as a result. Finally, capacity

30

adjustments are inherently risky because there is imperfect information, and market trends may rapidly intensify, ebb or even reverse. We have in the past not always been, and may in the future not be, able to accurately or timely predict trends in demand and consumer behavior or to take appropriate measures to mitigate risks and exploit opportunities resulting from such trends. Any inability in the future to identify or to adequately and effectively react to changes in demand could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, following the effective date of the OTC Final Rule of October 17, 2022, customers can now purchase or order Eargo hearing aids in retail settings; we have also partnered with certain resellers or other distributors, including benefits managers, to offer Eargo hearing aids for sale through their online storefronts or portals. Our expansion into physical retail settings and other third-party partnerships represent new channels for the Company in which we currently have limited expertise. We may not be able to accurately estimate the return rate or inventory needs of such channels, which could result in supply disruptions if growth in demand in such channels exceeds our ability to supply product. Currently, we have no or limited historical basis for us to make judgments on the inventory demand of any such retail partner or other third-party partner. If we underestimate such return rate or inventory requirements, our retail and other third-party partners may have inadequate inventory for sale to their customers. In addition, delays in the delivery of our products to our retail and other third-party partners or a failure to provide our product to our retail and other third-party partners in sufficient quantities in a timely manner could harm our relationships with such partners and impact our business and operating results. Moreover, we sell our products to our retail and other third-party partners at prices that are lower than what we would otherwise charge in our direct-to-consumer channel, reducing our associated revenues and gross margins.

We are dependent on international manufacturers and suppliers, as well as certain international contractors we engage from time to time with respect to select research and development activities, which exposes us to foreign operational and political risks that may harm our business.

We currently rely on a limited number of manufacturers: one located in Thailand, Hana Microelectronics, and our primary manufacturer, Pegatron Corporation, headquartered in Taiwan and with manufacturing facilities throughout Asia. Pegatron manufactures the Eargo 5, Eargo 6, and Eargo 7 hearing aid systems out of its facilities in Suzhou, China. In addition, we rely on some third-party suppliers in Europe, Southeast Asia, Japan, China and the United States, who supply, among other things, certain of the technology and raw materials used in the manufacturing of our products. We also engage certain international consultants, contractors and other specialists in connection with our research and development activities.

Our reliance on international operations exposes us to risks and uncertainties, including:

If any of these risks were to materialize, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

31

We or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by disasters, and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster. Any interruption in the operations of our or our suppliers’ manufacturing or other facilities may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our corporate headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, which has experienced severe earthquakes and wildfires as well as flooding and power outages. We do not carry earthquake insurance. Our manufacturers and many of our suppliers are located in Asia, which regions have experienced natural disasters such as earthquakes, landslides, flooding, tropical storms and tsunamis, and tornadoes. Our customer support operations as well as our third-party provider’s distribution facilities are based in regions of the Southern United States that have experienced flooding and tornadoes. Severe weather (including any potential effects of climate change), natural disasters and other calamities, such as pandemics (including COVID-19), earthquakes, tsunamis and hurricanes, fires and explosions, accidents, mechanical failures, unscheduled downtimes, civil unrest, strikes, transportation interruptions, unpermitted discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances, other environmental risks, sabotage, geopolitical unrest, political instability, terrorism or acts of war, could severely disrupt our operations, or our third-party manufacturers’ and suppliers’ operations, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our headquarters or other facilities, or those of our third-party manufacturers or suppliers, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as our enterprise financial systems or manufacturing resource planning and enterprise quality systems, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible, for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. A mechanical failure or disruption affecting any major operating line may result in a disruption to our ability to supply customers, and standby capacity may not be available. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place currently are limited and are unlikely to prove adequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. The potential impact of any disruption would depend on the nature and extent of the damage caused by a disaster. There can be no assurance that alternative production capacity will be available in the future in the event of a major disruption or, if it is available, that it could be obtained on favorable terms. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which, particularly when taken together with our lack of earthquake insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, integral parties in our supply chain are similarly vulnerable to natural disasters or other sudden, unforeseen and severe adverse events. If such an event were to affect our supply chain, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on sales of our hearing aids for our revenue. Demand for our hearing aids may not increase due to a variety of factors.

We expect that revenue from sales of our hearing aids will continue to account for our revenue for the foreseeable future. Continued and widespread market acceptance of hearing aids by consumers is critical to our future success. Consumer spending habits are affected by, among other things, prevailing economic conditions, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, interest rates, inflation rates, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions, which have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and may continue to be materially adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Hearing aids are often paid for directly by the consumer and, as a result, demand can vary significantly depending on economic conditions. The uncertainty regarding the extent to which we are able to validate and establish additional processes to support the submission of claims for reimbursement to health plans, including those under the FEHB program, the implementation of the new OTC hearing aid regulatory framework (which may lead insurance providers to take actions limiting our ability to access insurance coverage) and potential Medicare coverage for certain hearing aids (which may not include Eargo hearing aids) will require that we evaluate and consider any changes to our business model as new information becomes available, including a potential long-term shift to a primarily “cash-pay” model, with minimal volume from our customers using insurance benefits as a method of direct payment to Eargo, which would likely result in a sustained increased cost of customer acquisition and a reduction in shipments, revenue, gross margin, and higher operating expenses, which could have a material negative impact on our profitability and growth prospects. Without the benefit of customers with insurance coverage, the future growth prospects and profitability of the Company are uncertain, unless we can identify new sources of profitable growth.

Further, a general slowdown in the U.S. economy and international economies into which we may expand or an uncertain economic outlook could adversely affect consumer spending habits, which may result in, among other things, a reduction in consumer spending on elective or higher value products, a preference for lower cost products, or a reduction in demand for hearing aids generally, each of which would have an adverse effect on our sales and operating results. Ongoing challenges in global financial markets, as well as various social and political circumstances in the United States and around the world, have contributed and may continue to contribute to increased market volatility and economic uncertainties, including increased inflation pressures, supply chain challenges and international sanctions, some or all of which have resulted in an economic downturn and/or recession either globally or locally in the United States. These and other factors may continue to influence our customers’ behavior, disposable income, spending patterns and demand for our products. If there is a reduction in consumer demand for hearing aids generally, if consumers choose to use a competitive product rather than our hearing aids or if the average selling price of our hearing aids declines as a result of economic conditions, including employment levels and inflation, competitive pressures or any other reason, these factors could have a material

32

adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are not successful in adapting our production and cost structure to the market environment, we may experience further adverse effects that may be material to our business, financial condition and results of operations. See also the Risk Factor titled, “We face considerable uncertainty in our business prospects, as a significant portion of our revenue has historically been dependent upon reimbursement from third-party payors participating in the FEHB program, but we have operated on a primarily “cash-pay” basis since December 8, 2021. We may be unsuccessful in validating and establishing processes to support the submission of claims for reimbursement from third-party payors participating in the FEHB program. As a result, we have faced a significant reduction in revenue and any failure to establish processes to support reimbursement from third-party payors in the future may significantly and adversely impact our business and growth prospects and our ability to sell our products.”

We are subject to “conflict minerals” reporting obligations.

We are required to diligence the origin of minerals used in the manufacture of our products that have been designated “conflict minerals” under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and, beginning in May 2023, disclose and report whether or not such minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries. These requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of minerals used in the manufacture of our products. In addition, we will incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of the relevant minerals and metals used in our products.

Any future international expansion will subject us to additional costs and risks that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Historically, all of our sales have been to customers in the United States. To the extent we enter into international markets in the future, there are significant costs and risks inherent in conducting business in international markets. If we expand, or attempt to expand, into foreign markets, we will be subject to new business risks, in addition to regulatory risks. In addition, expansion into foreign markets imposes additional burdens on our executive and administrative personnel, finance and legal teams, research and marketing teams and general managerial resources.

We have limited experience with regulatory environments and market practices internationally, and we may not be able to penetrate or successfully operate in new markets. We may also encounter difficulty expanding into international markets because of limited brand recognition in certain parts of the world, leading to delayed acceptance of our products by consumers in these international markets. If we are unable to expand internationally and manage the complexity of international operations successfully, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If our efforts to introduce our products into foreign markets are not successful, we may have expended significant resources without realizing the expected benefit. Ultimately, the investment required for expansion into foreign markets could exceed the results of operations generated from this expansion.

We primarily rely on our own direct sales force, and if we are unable to maintain or expand our sales force, it could harm our business. Additionally, our reliance on our direct sales force may result in higher fixed costs than our competitors and may slow our ability to reduce costs in the face of a sudden decline in demand for our products.

We primarily rely on our own direct sales force to market and sell our products. We do not have any long-term employment contracts with the members of our direct sales force. Our operating results are directly dependent upon the sales and marketing efforts of our sales and customer support team. If our employees fail to adequately promote, market and sell our products, our sales could significantly decrease. As we launch new products, expand our product offerings and increase our marketing efforts with respect to existing products, we will need to expand the reach of our marketing and sales networks. Our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to attract, hire, train, retain and motivate skilled employees with significant technical knowledge in various areas. New hires require training and take time to achieve full productivity.

Additionally, most of our competitors rely predominantly on third-party distributors. Although we are beginning to expand our product offerings to physical retail locations of third parties and as a result will begin to rely on such third parties’ sales forces, we anticipate that we will continue to rely predominantly on our own direct sales force for the foreseeable future. A direct sales force may subject us to higher fixed costs than those of competitors that market their products through independent third parties, due to the costs that we will bear associated with employee benefits, training and managing sales personnel. As a result, we could be at a competitive disadvantage. Additionally, these fixed costs may slow our ability to reduce costs in the face of a sudden decline in demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on our relationship with a professional employer organization for our human relations function and as a co-employer of our personnel, and if that party failed to perform its responsibilities under that relationship, our relations with our employees could be damaged and we could incur liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

All of our U.S. personnel, including our executive officers, are co-employees of Eargo and a professional employer organization, Insperity. Under the terms of our arrangement, Insperity is the formal employer of all of our U.S. personnel and is responsible for

33

administering all payroll, including tax withholding, and providing health insurance and other benefits for these individuals, and our employees are governed by the work policies created by Insperity. We reimburse Insperity for these costs and pay Insperity an administrative fee for its services. If Insperity fails to comply with applicable laws or its obligations under this arrangement or creates work policies that are viewed unfavorably by employees, our relationship with our employees could be damaged. We could, under certain circumstances, be held liable for a failure by Insperity to appropriately pay, or withhold and remit required taxes from payments to, our employees. In such a case, our potential liability could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

We do not expect to become profitable in the near future, may never achieve profitability, and have incurred substantial net operating losses (“NOLs”) during our history. Unused NOLs will carry forward to offset a portion of future taxable income, if any, until such unused NOLs expire, if ever. Federal NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 are not subject to expiration, but the yearly utilization of such federal NOLs is limited to 80 percent of taxable income for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020. In addition, in general, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” (within the meaning of Section 382 of the Code) is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs or tax credits to offset future taxable income or taxes. For these purposes, an ownership change generally occurs where the aggregate stock ownership of one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who own at least 5% of a corporation’s stock increases by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of the corporation’s stock owned by such stockholders within a specified testing period.

We have experienced an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the Code in the past, for which an estimate has been accounted for in our deferred tax disclosure. We may experience additional ownership changes in the future as a result of shifts in our stock ownership (some of which shifts may be outside our control). While we do not expect any limitation would impact our ability to use our tax attributes before they expire, we may be unable to use a material portion of our NOLs and other tax attributes even if we attain profitability.

Risks relating to intellectual property and legal and regulatory matters

If we fail to comply with U.S. or foreign federal and state healthcare regulatory laws, we could be subject to penalties, including, but not limited to, administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs and the curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely impact our reputation and business operations.

We operate in a complex regulatory environment with an extensive and evolving set of federal, state and local governmental laws, regulations, and other requirements. These laws, regulations and other requirements are promulgated and overseen by a number of different legislative, regulatory, administrative and quasi-regulatory bodies, each of which may have varying interpretations, judgments or related guidance. For example, broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations apply to our operations and business practices. These laws may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we conduct our operations, including our sales and marketing practices, consumer incentive and other promotional programs and other business practices.

Such laws include, without limitation:

34

Foreign laws and regulations in this regard may vary greatly from country to country. For example, the advertising and promotion of our products in the European Economic Area (the “EEA”) would be subject to EEA Directives concerning misleading and comparative advertising and unfair commercial practices, as well as other EEA Member State legislation governing the advertising and promotion of medical devices. These laws may limit or restrict the advertising and promotion of our products to the general public and may impose limitations on our promotional activities with healthcare professionals. We are also subject to healthcare fraud and abuse regulation and enforcement by the countries in which we conduct our business. These healthcare laws and regulations vary significantly from country to country.

Ensuring that our internal operations and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. We utilize considerable resources on an ongoing basis to monitor, assess and respond to applicable legislative, regulatory, and administrative requirements, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful in our efforts to adhere to all of these requirements. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental laws and regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant penalties, including civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from government-funded healthcare programs, such as state Medicaid programs, TRICARE or similar programs in other countries or jurisdictions, disgorgement, imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Further, defending against any such actions can be costly and time-consuming and may require significant personnel resources. Even if we are successful in defending against any such actions that may be brought against us, our business may be impaired.

35

Our hearing aids are subject to extensive government regulation at the federal and state level, and our failure to comply with applicable requirements could harm our business.

Our hearing aids are medical devices that are subject to extensive regulation in the United States, including by the FDA and state agencies. The FDA regulates, among other things, the design, development, research, manufacture, testing, labelling, marketing, promotion, advertising, sale, import and export of hearing aid devices, such as those we market. Applicable medical device regulations are complex and have tended to become more stringent over time. Regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our ability to carry out or expand our operations.

The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes (Class I, II, or III) based on the degree of risk associated with a device and the level of regulatory control deemed necessary to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA’s general controls for medical devices, which include compliance with the FDA’s current good manufacturing practices (“cGMPs”) for devices, as reflected in the Quality System Regulation (“QSR”), establishment registration and device listing, reporting of adverse events, and truthful, non-misleading labelling, advertising, and promotional materials. Some Class I and Class II devices also require premarket clearance by the FDA through the premarket notification process set forth in Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”).

We have marketed in the past, and continue to market, certain Eargo system devices as Class I air-conduction or Class II wireless air-conduction hearing aids under existing regulations at 21 CFR 874.330 and 874.3305, respectively, both of which are exempt from 510(k) premarket review. In addition, in connection with the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, we plan to market our devices as OTC hearing aids following the April 14, 2023 compliance date, or sooner. In addition, we may seek to market certain devices as prescription hearing aids, which would require compliance with separate physical and electronic labeling requirements under the OTC Final Rule. In June 2022, we submitted a 510(k) premarket notification seeking FDA clearance of expanded labelling for our Eargo 5 and 6 hearing aids as “self-fitting” devices. On December 22, 2022, we received FDA 510(k) clearance for Eargo 5 and 6 as Class II self-fitting air-conduction hearing aids. In January 2023, we launched the Eargo 7 as our third over-the-counter, 510(k) cleared self-fitting air-conduction hearing aid.

In the 510(k) clearance process, before a device may be marketed, the FDA must determine that the proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally-marketed “predicate” device, which includes a device that has been previously cleared through the 510(k) process, a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (a “pre-amendments” device), a device that was originally on the U.S. market pursuant to an approved PMA application and later down-classified, or a legally marketed 510(k)-exempt device. To be “substantially equivalent,” the proposed device must have the same intended use as the predicate device, and either have the same technological characteristics as the predicate device or have different technological characteristics that do not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness than the predicate device. Clinical data are sometimes required to support substantial equivalence. In the PMA process, the FDA must determine that a proposed device is safe and effective for its intended use based, in part, on extensive data, including, but not limited to, technical, pre-clinical, clinical trial, manufacturing and labelling data. The PMA process is typically required for Class III devices that are deemed to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices.

Modifications to products that are approved through a PMA application generally require FDA approval. Similarly, certain modifications made to products cleared through a 510(k) may require a new 510(k) clearance. Both the PMA approval and the 510(k) clearance process can be expensive, lengthy and uncertain. The FDA’s 510(k) clearance process usually takes from 3 to 12 months, but can last longer. The process of obtaining a PMA is much more costly and uncertain and generally takes from one to three years, or even longer, from the time the application is filed with the FDA. In addition, a PMA generally requires the performance of one or more clinical trials. Despite the time, effort and cost, we cannot assure you that any particular device will be approved or cleared by the FDA.

Any delay or failure to obtain necessary regulatory clearances or approvals if required in the future could harm our business.

The FDA can delay, limit or deny clearance or approval of a device for many reasons, including:

In addition, the FDA may change its clearance and approval policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, or take other actions, which may prevent or delay our ability to introduce new products or modify our current products on a timely basis. For example, in November 2018, FDA officials announced forthcoming steps that the agency intends to take to modernize the 510(k) premarket notification pathway, and in September 2019, the FDA finalized guidance to describe an optional “safety and performance based” premarket review pathway for manufacturers of certain “well-understood device types,” which would allow manufacturers to demonstrate substantial equivalence by meeting objective safety and performance criteria established by the FDA, obviating the need

36

for manufacturers to compare the safety and performance of their medical devices to specific predicate devices in the clearance process. As another example, in the FDA’s OTC Final Rule, the FDA states that it is separately proposing to harmonize the QSR with an international consensus standard. If we are required to seek additional premarket review of our devices in the future or if the FDA proposes modifications to quality system requirements, these proposals and reforms could impose additional regulatory requirements on us and increase the costs of compliance.

We operate in a regulated industry and changes in the regulations or the implementation of existing regulations could affect our operations and prospects for future growth globally.

Our products and our business activities are subject to rigorous regulation in any jurisdiction in which we operate, now or in the future. In particular, these laws generally govern: (i) coverage and reimbursement by the national health services or by private health insurance services for the purchase of hearing aids; (ii) the supply of hearing aids to the public and, more specifically, the training and qualifications required to practice the profession of hearing aid fitting specialist; and (iii) the development, testing, manufacturing, labelling, premarket clearance or approval and marketing, advertising, promotion, export and import of our hearing aids. Accordingly, our business may be affected by changes in any such laws and regulations and, in particular, by changes to the conditions for coverage, the way in which reimbursement is calculated, the ability to obtain national health insurance coverage or the role of the ear, nose and throat specialists.

While the FDA is the primary regulatory body affecting our business, which is currently based in the United States, there are numerous other regulatory schemes at the international, national and sub-national levels to which we are subject and, to the extent we expand internationally, we could become subject to international agencies and regulatory bodies such as the various agencies that enforce the European Union (“EU”) Medical Device Directive, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, and sub-national regulatory schemes in such jurisdictions. These regulations can be burdensome and subject to change on short notice, exposing us to the risk of increased costs and business disruption, and regulatory premarket clearance or approval requirements may affect or delay our ability to market our new products. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain marketing clearance or approval for our new products, or enhancements or modifications to existing products. If we do, such clearance or approval may take a significant amount of time and require the expenditure of substantial resources. Further, such clearance or approval may involve stringent testing procedures, modifications, repairs or replacements of our products and could result in limitations on the proposed uses of our products. Regulatory authorities and legislators have been recently increasing their scrutiny of the healthcare industry, and there are ongoing regulatory efforts to reduce healthcare costs that may intensify in the future. Our business is also sensitive to any changes in tort and product liability laws.

Regulations pertaining to our products have become increasingly stringent and more common, particularly in developing countries whose regulations approach standards previously attained only by some Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, and we may become subject to more rigorous regulation by governmental authorities in the future. Conversely, however, the regulation of hearing aids as medical devices provides a barrier to entry for new competitors. If the markets in which we operate become less regulated, those barriers to entry may be eliminated or reduced, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Both before and after a product is commercially released, we have ongoing responsibilities under various laws and regulations. If a regulatory authority were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our hearing aids are ineffective or pose an unreasonable risk for the end-user, the authority may ban such hearing aids, detain or seize adulterated or misbranded hearing aids, order a recall, repair, replacement or refund of such instruments, and require us to notify health professionals and others that the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. A regulatory authority may also impose operating restrictions, enjoin and restrain certain violations of applicable law pertaining to medical devices, and assess civil or criminal penalties against our officers, employees or us. The regulatory authority may also recommend prosecution by law enforcement agencies. Any governmental law or regulation, existing or imposed in the future, or enforcement action taken may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Please also see the Risk Factor titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer business model and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products.”

Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise delay or prevent necessary regulatory clearances or approvals, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA to review and clear or approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory and policy changes, the FDA’s ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s ability to perform routine functions. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new medical devices or modifications to be cleared or approved by government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, including for 35 days

37

beginning on December 22, 2018, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities.

Separately, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA postponed most inspections of domestic and foreign manufacturing facilities at various points. Even though the FDA has since resumed standard inspection operations of domestic facilities where feasible, the FDA has continued to monitor and implement changes to its inspectional activities to ensure the safety of its employees and those of the firms it regulates as it adapts to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic, and any resurgence of the virus or emergence of new variants may lead to further inspectional delays. Regulatory authorities outside the United States may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Legislative or regulatory healthcare reforms may make it more difficult and costly to produce, market and distribute our products or to do so profitably.

Recent political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry to fundamental changes. Both the federal and state governments in the United States and foreign governments continue to propose and pass new legislation and regulations designed to contain or reduce the cost of healthcare, improve quality of care and expand access to healthcare, among other purposes. For example, the implementation of the Affordable Care Act has changed healthcare financing and delivery by both governmental and private insurers substantially and has affected medical device manufacturers significantly. Other legislative changes have also been proposed and adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted, which included, among other things, reductions to Medicare payments to providers through the Budget Control Act of 2011 and the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. In addition, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“MACRA”), enacted on April 16, 2015, repealed the formula by which Medicare made annual payment adjustments to physicians and replaced the former formula with fixed annual updates and a new system of incentive payments which began in 2019 that are based on various performance measures and physicians’ participation in alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations. Future legislation and regulatory changes, including, for example, the new OTC regulatory framework, may result in, directly or indirectly, decreased coverage and reimbursement for medical devices, which may further exacerbate industry-wide pressure to reduce the prices charged and impact market demand for medical devices. This could harm our ability to market and generate sales from our products.

Our hearing aids may cause or contribute to adverse medical events that we are required to report to the FDA, and if we fail to do so, we would be subject to sanctions that could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. The discovery of serious safety issues with our products, or a recall of our products either voluntarily or at the direction of the FDA or another governmental authority, could have a negative impact on us.

We are subject to the FDA’s medical device reporting regulations and similar foreign regulations, which require us to report to the FDA when we receive or become aware of information that reasonably suggests that one or more of our hearing aids may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that, if the malfunction were to recur, it could cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. The timing of our obligation to report is triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event. We may fail to report adverse events of which we become aware within the prescribed timeframe. We may also fail to recognize that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed in time from the initial use of the hearing aid device. If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the FDA could take action, including warning letters, untitled letters, administrative actions, criminal prosecution, imposition of civil monetary penalties, seizure of our products or, if premarket review is required in the future, delay in clearance of future products.

The FDA and foreign regulatory bodies have the authority to require the recall of commercialized medical device products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture of a product or in the event that a product poses an unacceptable risk to health. The FDA’s authority to require a recall must be based on a finding that there is reasonable probability that the device could cause serious injury or death. We may also choose to voluntarily recall a product if any material deficiency is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us could occur as a result of an unacceptable risk to health, component failures, malfunctions, manufacturing defects, labelling or design deficiencies, packaging defects or other deficiencies or failures to comply with applicable regulations. We cannot assure you that product defects or other errors will not occur in the future. Recalls involving our hearing aids could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Medical device manufacturers are required to maintain certain records of recalls and corrections, even if they are not reportable to the FDA. We may initiate voluntary withdrawals or corrections for our hearing aid devices in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA. If the FDA disagrees with our determinations, it could require us to report those actions as recalls and we may be subject to enforcement action. A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers, potentially lead to product liability claims against us and negatively affect our sales.

38

We must manufacture our products in accordance with federal and state regulations, and we could be forced to recall our products or terminate production if we fail to comply with these regulations.

The methods used in, and the facilities used for, the manufacture of our hearing aid devices must comply with the FDA’s QSR, which is a complex regulatory scheme that covers the procedures and documentation of the design, testing, production, process controls, quality assurance, labelling, packaging, handling, storage, distribution, servicing and shipping of medical devices. Furthermore, we are required to verify that our suppliers maintain facilities, procedures and operations that comply with our quality and applicable regulatory requirements. The FDA enforces the QSR through periodic announced or unannounced inspections of medical device manufacturing facilities, which may include the facilities of subcontractors, and such inspections can result in warning letters, untitled letters and other regulatory communications and adverse publicity. Our hearing aid devices are also subject to similar state regulations and various laws and regulations of foreign countries governing manufacturing.

We cannot guarantee that we or any subcontractors will take the necessary steps to comply with applicable regulations, which could cause delays in the manufacture and delivery of our products. In addition, failure to comply with applicable FDA requirements or later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products or manufacturing processes could result in, among other things:

Any of these actions could significantly and negatively impact supply of our products. If any of these events occurs, our reputation could be harmed, we could be exposed to product liability claims and we could lose customers and suffer reduced revenue and increased costs.

We are subject to numerous state and local hearing aid and licensure laws and regulations as well as state laws regulating the corporate practice of audiology or fee splitting, and non-compliance with these laws and regulations may expose us to significant costs or liabilities and negatively impact our business, financial condition and ability to operate in those states.

We are subject to numerous state and local hearing aid laws and regulations relating to, among other matters, licensure and registration of audiologists and other individuals we employ or contract with to provide services and dispense hearing aids. Many states also have laws that regulate the corporate practice of audiology, including exercising control, interfering with or influencing an audiologist or other hearing care specialist’s professional judgment and entering into certain financial arrangements, such as splitting professional fees with audiologists. Other state and local laws and regulations require us to maintain warranty and return policies for consumers allowing for the return of product and restrict advertising and marketing practices. These state and local laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time; additionally, these laws and their interpretations vary from state to state and are enforced by state courts and regulatory authorities, each with broad discretion.

The FDCA preempts state laws relating to the safety and efficacy of medical devices and state laws that are different from or in addition to federal requirements. In addition, under FDARA, the OTC Final Rule preempts any state or local requirement specifically related to hearing products that would restrict or interfere with commercial activity involving OTC hearing aids. However, the FDA made clear in its rulemaking that although a state or local government may not require the order, involvement, or intervention of a licensed person for consumers to access OTC hearing aids, any person representing as a defined professional or establishment remains subject to applicable state and local requirements, even if the person undertakes commercial or professional activities only in relation to OTC hearing aids. Our ability to operate profitably will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and maintain any necessary licenses and other approvals and operate in compliance with applicable state laws and regulations. A determination that we are in violation of applicable laws and regulations in any jurisdiction in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on us, particularly if we are unable to restructure our operations and arrangements to comply with the requirements of that jurisdiction, if we are required to restructure our operations and arrangements, including those with our audiologists and other licensed professionals, at a significant cost, or if we are subject to penalties or other adverse action.

Applicable federal laws and regulations continue to evolve. In addition to the changes under the OTC Final Rule, the Biden Executive Order July 9, 2021 instructed the FTC to review overly restrictive occupational licensing requirements that may impede the ability for licensed individuals to move between states. We cannot predict the impact on our business of new or amended laws or regulations or any changes in the way existing and future laws and regulations are interpreted or enforced, nor can we ensure we will be able to

39

obtain or maintain any required licenses or permits. See the Risk Factor titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer business model and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products.”

We may face risks related to any future international sales, including the need to obtain necessary foreign regulatory clearance or approvals.

Sales of our products outside the United States will subject us to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. The time required to obtain clearances or approvals required by other countries may be longer than that required for FDA clearance or approval, and requirements for such approvals may differ from FDA requirements. We may be unable to obtain regulatory approvals and may also incur significant costs in attempting to obtain foreign regulatory approvals. If we experience delays in receipt of approvals to market our products in new jurisdictions, or if we fail to receive these approvals, we may be unable to market our products in international markets in a timely manner, if at all, which could materially impact our international expansion and adversely affect our business as a whole. Some international regulations may also limit the availability of our hearing aids to customers in certain jurisdictions without our first obtaining a license or engaging a third party to provide such financing, or limit the financing options we can offer our customers. If any of these risks were to materialize, they could limit our expected international expansion opportunities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulations in certain foreign countries may challenge our direct-to-consumer sales model.

Our business may also be affected by actions of domestic and foreign governments to restrict the activities of direct-to-consumer companies for various reasons, including a limitation on the ability of direct-to-consumer companies to operate without the involvement of a traditional retail channel. To the extent that we begin to offer our products in international markets, foreign governments may also introduce other forms of protectionist legislation, such as limitations or requirements on where the products can or must be produced or requirements that non-domestic companies doing or seeking to do business place a certain percentage of ownership of legal entities in the hands of local nationals to protect the commercial interests of its citizens. Customs laws, tariffs, import duties, export and import quotas and restrictions on repatriation of foreign earnings and/or other methods of accessing cash generated internationally, may negatively affect our local or corporate operations. Additionally, the U.S. government may impose restrictions on our ability to engage in business in other countries in connection with the foreign policy of the United States. Any such restrictions on our direct-to-consumer sales model in international jurisdictions could limit our ability to grow internationally, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology, and if we are unable to obtain, maintain or successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, the commercial value of our products and services will be adversely affected and our competitive position may be harmed.

Our success and ability to compete depend in part on our ability to maintain and enforce existing intellectual property and to obtain, maintain and enforce further intellectual property protection for our products and services, both in the United States and in other countries. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as licensing agreements and third-party confidentiality and assignment agreements. Our inability to do so could harm our competitive position. As of December 31, 2022, we had 26 issued U.S. patents, 26 patents outside the United States, 9 pending U.S. patent applications and 12 pending foreign patent applications.

We rely on our portfolio of issued and pending patent applications in the United States and other countries to protect our intellectual property and our competitive position. However, the patent positions of medical device companies, including our patent position, may involve complex legal and factual questions, and, therefore, the scope, validity and enforceability of any patent claims that we may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty. Accordingly, we cannot provide any assurances that any of our issued patents have, or that any of our currently pending or future patent applications that mature into issued patents will include, claims with a scope sufficient to protect our products and services. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in the issuance of patents or, if issued, may not issue in a form that will be advantageous to us. While we generally apply for patents in those countries where we intend to make, have made, use or sell patented products, we may not accurately predict all of the countries where patent protection will ultimately be desirable. If we fail to timely file for a patent, we may be precluded from doing so at a later date. Additionally, any patents issued to us may be challenged, narrowed, invalidated, held unenforceable or circumvented, or may not be sufficiently broad to prevent third parties from producing competing products similar in design to our products.

Changes in either patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our patent protection, which in turn could diminish the commercial value of our products and services. In addition, any protection afforded by foreign patents may be more limited than that provided under U.S. patent and intellectual property laws. There can be no assurance that any of our patents, any patents licensed to us or any patents which we may be issued in the future will provide us with a competitive advantage or afford us protection against infringement by others, or that the patents will not be successfully challenged or circumvented by third parties, including our competitors. Further, there can be no assurance that we will have adequate resources to enforce our patents.

40

In addition, from time to time we engage international consultants, contractors and other specialists to assist in our research and development activities. Certain of these third parties may operate in jurisdictions where it is difficult or impossible for us to assert our intellectual property rights in case of infringement or theft, either as a statutory or practical matter. We have engaged in, and may in the future engage in, various contractual relationships with third parties outside the United States in connection with the development of our products, which may expose our technology and intellectual property to a heightened risk of unauthorized use or theft.

Any of the foregoing risks, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our competitive position may be harmed.

We rely on our trademarks, trade names and brand names to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors, and have registered or applied to register many of these trademarks. There can be no assurance that our trademark applications will be approved. Third parties may also oppose our trademark applications or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks. In the event that our trademarks are successfully challenged, we could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote resources to advertising and marketing new brands. Further, there can be no assurance that competitors will not infringe our trademarks or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks. We also license third parties to use our trademarks. In an effort to preserve our trademark rights, we enter into license agreements with these third parties, which govern the use of our trademarks and require our licensees to abide by quality control standards with respect to the goods and services that they provide under our trademarks. Although we make efforts to monitor the use of our trademarks by our licensees, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be sufficient to ensure that our licensees abide by the terms of their licenses. In the event that our licensees fail to do so, our trademark rights could be diluted. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our intellectual property, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Third parties, including our competitors, could be infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating our intellectual property rights. While we are not aware of any unauthorized use of our intellectual property, we do not regularly conduct monitoring for unauthorized use at this time. In the future, we may from time to time, seek to analyze our competitors’ products and services, or seek to enforce our rights against potential infringement, misappropriation or violation of our intellectual property. However, the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be adequate to enforce our rights as against such infringement, misappropriation or violation of our intellectual property. We may not be able to detect unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights. Any inability to meaningfully enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our ability to compete and reduce demand for our products and services.

We may in the future become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could harm our business. In any lawsuit we bring to enforce our intellectual property rights, a court may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on grounds that our intellectual property rights do not cover the technology in question. If we initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering a product, the defendant could counterclaim that such patent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. Mechanisms for such challenges include re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, interference proceedings, derivation proceedings, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). Such proceedings could result in the revocation of, cancellation of, or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our products, or any future products that we may develop.

The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a third party were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our products. Such a loss of patent protection would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearing, motions, or other interim developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of shares of our common stock. Even if we ultimately prevail, a court may decide not to grant an injunction against further infringing activity and instead award only monetary damages, which may not be an adequate remedy. Furthermore, the monetary cost of such litigation and the diversion of the attention of our management could outweigh any

41

benefit we receive as a result of the proceedings. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of third parties or are subject to an intellectual property infringement or misappropriation claim, our ability to grow our business may be severely limited and our business could be adversely affected.

We may in the future be the subject of patent or other litigation. Our products and services may infringe, or third parties may claim that they infringe, intellectual property rights covered by patents or patent applications under which we do not hold licenses or other rights. Third parties may own or control these patents and patent applications in the United States and abroad. These third parties could bring claims against us that would cause us to incur substantial expenses and, if successfully asserted against us, could cause us to pay substantial damages. Further, if a patent infringement or other intellectual property-related lawsuit were brought against us, we could be forced to stop or delay production or sales of the product that is the subject of the suit. From time to time, we have received and may in the future receive letters from third parties drawing our attention to their patent rights. While we take steps to ensure that we do not infringe upon, misappropriate or otherwise violate the rights of others, there may be other more pertinent rights of which we are presently unaware. The defense and prosecution of intellectual property lawsuits could result in substantial expense to us and significant diversion of effort by our technical and management personnel. An adverse determination of any litigation or interference proceeding to which we may become a party could subject us to significant liabilities. As a result of patent infringement claims, or in order to avoid potential claims, we may choose or be required to seek a license from the third party and be required to pay significant license fees, royalties or both. Licenses may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, in which event our business would be materially and adversely affected. Even if we were able to obtain a license, the rights may be nonexclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, if we are unable to obtain such licenses, we could be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations, which could harm our business significantly.

Changes in U.S. patent laws may limit our ability to obtain, defend and/or enforce our patents.

Any patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. For example, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the “Leahy-Smith Act”) included a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that affected the way patent applications are prosecuted and also affect patent litigation. The USPTO developed regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first to file provisions, which became effective on March 16, 2013. The first to file provisions limit the rights of an inventor to patent an invention if not the first to file an application for patenting that invention, even if such invention was the first invention. Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business.

However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the enforcement and defense of our issued patents. For example, the Leahy-Smith Act provides that an administrative tribunal known as the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“PTAB”) provides a venue for challenging the validity of patents at a cost that is much lower than district court litigation and on timelines that are much faster. Although it is not clear what, if any, long-term impact the PTAB proceedings will have on the operation of our business, the initial results of patent challenge proceedings before the PTAB since its inception in 2013 have resulted in the invalidation of many U.S. patent claims. The availability of the PTAB as a lower-cost, faster and potentially more potent tribunal for challenging patents could increase the likelihood that our own patents will be challenged, thereby increasing the uncertainties and costs of maintaining and enforcing them.

We may be subject to claims that we or our employees have misappropriated the intellectual property of a third party, including trade secrets or know-how, or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors and third parties may claim an ownership interest in intellectual property we regard as our own.

Many of our employees and consultants were previously employed at or engaged by other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Some of these employees, consultants and contractors may have executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such previous employment. Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the intellectual property, proprietary information, know-how or trade secrets of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these individuals have, inadvertently or otherwise, misappropriated the intellectual property or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information, of these former employers, competitors or other third parties. Additionally, we may be subject to claims from third parties challenging our ownership interest in or inventorship of intellectual property we regard as our own, based on claims that our agreements with employees or consultants obligating them to assign intellectual property to us are ineffective or in conflict with prior or competing contractual obligations to assign inventions to another employer, to a former employer, or to another person or entity. Litigation may be necessary to defend against claims, and it may be necessary or we may desire to enter into a license to settle any such claim; however, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If our defense to those claims fails, in addition to paying monetary damages or a settlement payment, a court could prohibit us from using technologies, features or other intellectual property

42

that are essential to our products, if such technologies or features are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. An inability to incorporate technologies, features or other intellectual property that are important or essential to our products could have a material adverse effect on our business and competitive position, and may prevent us from selling our products. In addition, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and could be a distraction to management. Any litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our ability to hire employees or contract with independent sales representatives. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our products, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flows and prospects.

If we fail to execute invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors involved in the development of intellectual property or are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, the value of our products and our business and competitive position could be harmed.

In addition to patent protection, we also rely on protection of copyright, trade secrets, know-how and confidential and proprietary information. We generally enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties upon their commencement of a relationship with us. However, we may not enter into such agreements with all employees, consultants and third parties who have been involved in the development of our intellectual property. In addition, these agreements may not provide meaningful protection against the unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets or other confidential information, and adequate remedies may not exist if unauthorized use or disclosure were to occur. The exposure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information would impair our competitive advantages and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, a failure to protect our proprietary rights may allow competitors to copy our technology, which could adversely affect our pricing and market share. Further, other parties may independently develop substantially equivalent know-how and technology.

In addition to contractual measures, we try to protect the confidential nature of our proprietary information using commonly accepted physical and technological security measures. Such measures may not, for example, in the case of misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee or third party with authorized access, provide adequate protection for our proprietary information. Our security measures may not prevent an employee or consultant from misappropriating our trade secrets and providing them to a competitor, and recourse we take against such misconduct may not provide an adequate remedy to protect our interests fully. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret can be difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. Even though we use commonly accepted security measures, trade secret violations are often a matter of state law, and the criteria for protection of trade secrets can vary among different jurisdictions. In addition, trade secrets may be independently developed by others in a manner that could prevent legal recourse by us. We also have agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties that obligate them to assign their inventions to us; however, these agreements may not be self-executing, not all employees or consultants may enter into such agreements, or employees or consultants may breach or violate the terms of these agreements, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation. If any of our intellectual property or confidential or proprietary information, such as our trade secrets, were to be disclosed or misappropriated, or if any such information was independently developed by a competitor, it could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

We may be unable to enforce our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. This could make it difficult for us to stop infringement of our foreign patents, if obtained, or the misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. For example, some foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit. Patent protection must ultimately be sought on a country-by-country basis, which is an expensive and time-consuming process with uncertain outcomes. Accordingly, we may choose not to seek patent protection in certain countries, and we will not have the benefit of patent protection in such countries.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate. In addition, changes in the law and legal decisions by courts in the United States and foreign countries may affect our ability to obtain adequate protection for our technology and the enforcement of our intellectual property.

Actual or perceived failures to comply with applicable data privacy and security laws, regulations, policies, standards, contractual obligations and other requirements related to data privacy and security and changes to such laws, regulations, standards, policies and contractual obligations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

43

The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving, and there has been an increasing focus on privacy and data protection issues with the potential to affect our business. We are or may become subject to numerous state, federal and foreign laws, requirements and regulations governing the collection, transmission, use, disclosure, storage, retention and security of personal and personally-identifying information, such as information that we may collect in connection with conducting our business in the United States and abroad. Implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, and we cannot yet determine the impact future laws, regulations, standards or perception of their requirements may have on our business. This evolution may create uncertainty in our business, affect our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions or to collect, store, transfer use and share personal information, necessitate the acceptance of more onerous obligations in our contracts, result in liability or impose additional costs on us. The cost of compliance with these laws, regulations and standards is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with federal, state or foreign laws or regulation, our internal policies and procedures or our contracts governing our processing of personal information could result in negative publicity, government investigations and enforcement actions, fines, imprisonment of company officials and public censure, claims by third parties, damage to our reputation and loss of goodwill, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including protected health information (“PHI”), personally identifiable information (“PII”), intellectual property and proprietary business information owned or controlled by ourselves or our customers, third-party payors and other parties. We also collect and store sensitive data of our employees and contractors. We manage and maintain our applications and data utilizing cloud-based data centers for PII. We utilize external security and infrastructure vendors to manage parts of our data centers.

As our operations and business grow, we are and may become subject to or affected by new or additional data protection laws and regulations and face increased scrutiny or attention from regulatory authorities. In the United States, HIPAA establishes, among other things, privacy and security standards that limit the use and disclosure of PHI, and imposes certain obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of PHI by covered entities, such as health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and healthcare providers, as well as their business associates that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of PHI, and their covered subcontractors. HIPAA requires covered entities and their business associates to develop and maintain certain policies and procedures with respect to PHI that is used or disclosed. Further, in the event of a breach of unsecured protected health information, HIPAA requires covered entities to notify each individual whose PHI is breached as well as federal regulators and, in some cases, the media. Certain states have also adopted comparable privacy and security laws and regulations, some of which may be more stringent than HIPAA. Such laws and regulations will be subject to interpretation by various courts and other governmental authorities, thus creating potentially complex compliance issues for us and our future customers and strategic partners. Determining whether protected health information has been handled in compliance with applicable privacy standards and our contractual obligations can be complex and may be subject to changing interpretation. If we are unable to properly protect the privacy and security of PHI, we could be found to have breached our contracts. Further, if we fail to comply with applicable privacy laws, including applicable privacy and security standards, we could face civil and criminal penalties. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), has the discretion to impose penalties without attempting to resolve violations through informal means. HHS enforcement activity can result in financial liability and reputational harm, and responses to such enforcement activity can consume significant internal resources, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

In addition, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020, creates individual privacy rights for California consumers and increases the privacy and security obligations of entities handling certain personal information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. Further, the California Privacy Rights Act (the “CPRA”), which generally went into effect on January 1, 2023, imposes additional data protection obligations on covered businesses, including additional consumer rights processes, limitations on data uses, new audit requirements for higher risk data, and opt outs for certain uses of sensitive data. It also created a new California data protection agency authorized to issue substantive regulations and could result in increased privacy and information security enforcement. The CCPA and CPRA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability, and many similar laws have been proposed at the federal level and in other states. In the event that we are subject to or affected by HIPAA, the CCPA, the CPRA or other domestic privacy and data protection laws, any liability from failure to comply with the requirements of these laws could adversely affect our financial condition. Similar laws have passed in Virginia, Connecticut, Colorado and Utah, and have been proposed in other states and at the federal level, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the United States. The enactment of such laws could have potentially conflicting requirements that would make compliance challenging. We may need to invest substantial resources in putting in place policies and procedures to comply with these evolving state laws.

In addition, state attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations that threaten the privacy of state residents. We cannot be sure how these regulations will be interpreted, enforced or applied to our operations. In addition to the risks associated with enforcement activities and potential contractual liabilities, our ongoing efforts to comply with evolving laws and regulations at the federal and state level may be costly and require ongoing modifications to our policies, procedures and systems.

44

Data protection laws are evolving globally and may add additional compliance costs and legal risks to our operations. We are subject to the GDPR, which went into effect in May 2018 and which imposes obligations on companies that operate in our industry with respect to the processing of personal data and the cross-border transfer of such data. The GDPR imposes onerous accountability obligations requiring data controllers and processors to maintain a record of their data processing and policies. If our or our partners’ or service providers’ privacy or data security measures fail to comply with the GDPR requirements, we may be subject to litigation, regulatory investigations, enforcement notices requiring us to change the way we use personal data and/or fines of up to 20 million Euros or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, as well as compensation claims by affected individuals, negative publicity, reputational harm and a potential loss of business and goodwill. Further, as of January 1, 2021, impacted companies have to comply with the GDPR and the UK GDPR, which, together with the amended UK Data Protection Act 2018, retains the GDPR in UK national law, the latter regime having the ability to separately fine up to the greater of £17.5 million or 4% of global turnover. While we continue to address the implications of the recent changes to European data privacy regulations, data privacy remains an evolving landscape at both the domestic and international level, with new regulations coming into effect and continued legal challenges, and our efforts to comply with the evolving data protection rules may be unsuccessful. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices. Accordingly, we must devote significant resources to understanding and complying with this changing landscape.

Although we work to comply with applicable laws, regulations and standards, our contractual obligations and other legal obligations, these requirements are evolving and may be modified, interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another, and may conflict with one another or other legal obligations with which we must comply. Any failure or perceived failure by us or our employees, representatives, contractors, consultants or other third parties to comply with such requirements or adequately address privacy and security concerns, even if unfounded, could result in additional cost and liability to us, damage our reputation, negative publicity, loss of goodwill and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations or prospects.

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, economic and trade sanctions regulations and similar laws could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.

We are subject to the FCPA and similar regulations in other countries, as well as other laws in the United States and elsewhere that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Certain suppliers of our product components are located in countries known to experience corruption. Business activities in these countries create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of our employees, contractors or agents that could be in violation of various laws, including the FCPA and anti-bribery laws in these countries, even though these parties are not always subject to our control. While we have implemented policies and procedures designed to discourage these practices by our employees, consultants and agents and to identify and address potentially impermissible transactions under such laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that all of our employees, consultants and agents will not take actions in violation of our policies, for which we may be ultimately responsible.

We are also subject to certain economic and trade sanctions programs that are administered by the Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control which prohibit or restrict transactions to or from or dealings with specified countries, their governments and in certain circumstances, their nationals, and with individuals and entities that are specially designated nationals of those countries, narcotics traffickers and terrorists or terrorist organizations.

Failure to comply with any of these laws and regulations or changes in this regulatory environment, including changing interpretations and the implementation of new or varying regulatory requirements by the government, may result in significant financial penalties or reputational harm, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks relating to our common stock

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and entity level controls. If our remediation of the material weaknesses is not effective, or if we experience additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls in the future, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

In connection with the preparation of our financial statements at the time of our IPO and through the financial reporting period ended December 31, 2022, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and our entity level controls. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal controls such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

With respect to the material weakness related to internal control over financial reporting, we have implemented, and are in the process of reviewing corrective actions taken to improve our internal control over financial reporting to remediate this material weakness,

45

including (i) the hiring of additional qualified supervisory resources and finance department employees, and (ii) the engagement of additional technical accounting consulting resources.

With respect to the material weakness related to entity level controls related to a lack of sufficient qualified healthcare industry compliance and risk management resources, including those necessary to provide appropriate oversight, monitor compliance, and to identify and mitigate risks with respect to the financial reporting and disclosures of our operations, we have expended, and intend to continue to expend, considerable time and effort to enhance our compliance and risk management processes with respect to our operations in the healthcare industry to remediate this material weakness, including the hiring of additional qualified personnel, and the engagement of additional specialized consulting resources.

We cannot assure you that the measures we intend to take will be sufficient to remediate the material weaknesses we have identified or avoid potential future material weaknesses. While we believe that our efforts will enhance our internal control, remediation of the material weaknesses will require further validation and testing of the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over a sustained period of financial reporting cycles, and we cannot assure you that we have identified all, or that we will not in the future have additional, material weaknesses.

If we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, we may not be able to accurately report our financial condition or results of operations which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

We are subject to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, and the related rules of the SEC, which generally require our management to furnish a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The process of designing, implementing and testing the internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation is time-consuming, costly and complicated. If we fail to remediate identified material weaknesses or identify additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner, or if we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock could decline, and we could also become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources. Because we re-qualified as a smaller reporting company and we have less than $100 million in annual revenue, we are a non-accelerated filer and are no longer required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until we become an accelerated filer or large accelerated filer. These exemptions and reduced disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as a smaller reporting company may make it harder for investors to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or products.

Since our inception, our operations have been financed primarily by net proceeds from the sale of our convertible preferred stock and common stock, indebtedness and revenue from the sales of our products. We anticipate our future capital requirements will be substantial and that we will need to raise significant additional capital to fund our operations through equity or debt financing, or some combination thereof.

If we are unable to raise additional funding to meet our operational needs, we will be forced to limit or cease our operations. We regularly consider fundraising opportunities and may decide, from time to time, to raise capital based on various factors, including market conditions and our plans of operation. We may seek funds through borrowings or through additional rounds of financing, including private or public equity or debt offerings. Additional capital may not be available to us on acceptable terms on a timely basis, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, or if the terms of potential funding sources are unfavorable, our business and our ability to develop our technology and our products would be harmed. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may suffer dilution and the terms of any financing may adversely affect the rights of our stockholders. In addition, as a condition to providing additional funds to us, future investors may demand, and may be granted, rights superior to those of existing stockholders. Debt financing, if available, is likely to involve restrictive covenants limiting our flexibility in conducting future business activities, and, in the event of insolvency, debt holders would be repaid before holders of our equity securities receive any distribution of our corporate assets. We also could be required to seek funds through arrangements with partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights or jointly own some aspects of our technologies or products that we would otherwise pursue on our own.

46

We incur significantly increased costs and are subject to additional regulations and requirements as a result of becoming a public company, which could lower our profits or make it more difficult to run our business.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements. We also have incurred and will continue to incur costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and related rules implemented by the SEC and the exchange our securities are listed on. The expenses generally incurred by public companies for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly, although we are currently unable to estimate these costs with any degree of certainty. These laws and regulations also could make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, on our board committees or as our executive officers. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our common stock, fines, sanctions, other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.

If our operating and financial performance in any given period does not meet any guidance that we provide to the public, the market price of our common stock may decline.

Any public guidance we provided regarding our expected operating and financial results for future periods is comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other public filings and public statements. Our actual results may not always be in line with or exceed any guidance we provide, especially in times of economic uncertainty. If our operating or financial results for a particular period do not meet any guidance we provide or the expectations of investment analysts, or if we reduce our guidance for future periods, the market price of our common stock may decline. In September 2021, we withdrew our financial guidance for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 as a result of uncertainties arising with respect to the DOJ investigation and claims audits (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits” for more information). While we have since provided some limited financial guidance, we cannot be certain if or when we will resume providing more fulsome financial guidance.

Our principal stockholder, an entity affiliated with Patient Square, owns a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

As of December 31, 2022, our principal stockholder, an entity affiliated with Patient Square, held approximately 76.3% of our outstanding voting stock. As a result of this ownership position, Patient Square may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, Patient Square may be able to control elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our common stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.

We have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock; as a result, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business. Any future determination related to dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws, and will depend upon, among other factors, our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions and capital requirements. Additionally, our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock may be limited by the terms of any future debt or preferred securities we issue or any future credit facilities we enter into. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq rules and, as a result, qualify for, and rely on, certain exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.

Patient Square controls a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq corporate governance standards. A company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq rules and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq, including:

47

We intend to rely on some or all of the exemptions listed above for so long as we are eligible to do so. To the extent we utilize these exemptions, we will not have a majority of independent directors and our nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees will not consist entirely of independent directors. As a result, our board of directors and those committees may have more directors who do not meet Nasdaq’s independence standards than they would if those standards were to apply. The independence standards are intended to ensure that directors who meet those standards are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors. Accordingly, our stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall.

If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline. On a post-reverse stock split basis, we had a total of 20,726,965 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2022.

Patient Square, which holds approximately 76.3% of our common stock, and maintains rights with respect to the registration of their shares under the Securities Act. On December 16, 2022, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-268859) to register for resale up to 15,821,299 shares held by Patient Square (as amended, the “PSC Resale Registration Statement”), representing the entirety of Patient Square’s holdings in the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2022. The PSC Resale Registration Statement became effective on February 13, 2023. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act has resulted in the shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except for shares purchased by affiliates. Any sales of these securities by Patient Square could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.

Provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could discourage a takeover that stockholders may consider favorable and may lead to entrenchment of management.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent changes in control or changes in our management without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include:

We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions contained in Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under Section 203, a corporation may not, in general, engage in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three years or, among other exceptions, the board of directors has approved the transaction.

48

Claims for indemnification by our directors, officers and other employees or agents may reduce our available funds to satisfy successful third-party claims against us and may reduce the amount of money available to us.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.

In addition, as permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated bylaws and our indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our directors, officers and certain other employees provide that:

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for certain disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, in the event that the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware or other state courts of the State of Delaware) is the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty, any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws, or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine; provided that, the exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction; and provided further that, if and only if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismisses any such action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, such action may be brought in another state or federal court sitting in the State of Delaware. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws also provide that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action against us or any of our directors, officers, employees or agents and arising under the Securities Act. Nothing in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws precludes stockholders that assert claims under the Exchange Act from bringing such claims in state or federal court, subject to applicable law.

We believe these provisions may benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law and federal securities laws by chancellors and judges, as applicable, particularly experienced in resolving corporate disputes, efficient administration of cases on a more expedited schedule relative to other forums and protection against the burdens of multi-forum litigation. However, this choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims, although our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Furthermore, the enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court could find these types of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable. While the Delaware courts have determined that such choice of forum provisions are facially valid, a stockholder may nevertheless seek to bring a claim in a venue other than those designated in the exclusive forum provisions, and there can be no assurance that such provisions will be enforced by a court in those other jurisdictions. If a court were to find the choice of forum provision that will be contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and

49

restated bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

If securities analysts publish negative evaluations of our stock or stop publishing research or reports about our business, the price of our stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock relies in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We currently have limited research coverage by financial analysts. Some of the analysts who previously covered the Company have discontinued coverage, and certain analysts have downgraded their evaluation of our stock. For example, certain of our analysts downgraded our common stock following our announcement of the DOJ investigation and claims audits (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits”), which may have contributed to a significant decline in the price of our common stock. If any of the analysts who continue to cover or cover us in the future downgrade their evaluation of our common stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our common stock price may decline. If additional analysts cease to cover our stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.

General risk factors

Engaging in acquisitions or strategic partnerships may increase our capital requirements, dilute our stockholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.

As part of our business strategy, we may acquire companies or businesses, enter into strategic partnerships and joint ventures and make investments to further our business. Risks associated with these transactions include the following, any of which could adversely affect our revenue, gross margin, profitability, cash flows and financial condition:

In addition, in connection with these acquisitions or strategic partnerships, we may issue dilutive securities, assume or incur debt obligations, incur large one-time expenses and acquire intangible assets that could result in significant future amortization expense. Moreover, we may not be able to locate suitable acquisition or partnership opportunities, and even if we do locate such opportunities we may not be able to successfully bid for or obtain them due to competitive factors or lack of sufficient resources. This inability could impair our ability to grow or obtain access to technology or products that may be important to the development of our business.

We experience seasonality in our business, which may cause fluctuations in our financial results.

In the past we have experienced, and we may continue to experience, seasonality in our business, with higher sales volumes in quarters when we commercially launch new products and in the fourth calendar quarter as a result of holiday promotional activity. However, since our public disclosure of the DOJ investigation and our related decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022, we have experienced and may continue to experience a material decline in gross systems shipped. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits” for more information. As a result, seasonal factors did not have a material impact on our results of operations for the three months and year ended December 31, 2022. Negative publicity, including in relation to the DOJ investigation, the claims audits, and other legal proceedings has and could continue to harm our reputation and brand and diminish consumer confidence in our products, which may further impact any seasonal trends in our business.

Because of these fluctuations, among other factors, it is possible that in future periods our operating results will fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, in which case the market price of our stock would likely decrease. These fluctuations,

50

among other factors, also mean that our operating results in any particular period may not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.

Our effective tax rate may vary significantly from period to period.

Various internal and external factors may have favorable or unfavorable effects on our future effective tax rate. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in tax laws both within and outside the United States, regulations and/or rates, structural changes in our business, new or changes to accounting pronouncements, non-deductible goodwill impairments, changing interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations, changes in the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the various jurisdictions in which we operate that have differing statutory tax rates, the future levels of tax benefits of equity-based compensation, changes in overall levels of pretax earnings or changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. Additionally, we could be challenged by state and local tax authorities as to the propriety of our sales tax compliance, and our results could be materially impacted by these compliance determinations.

In addition, our effective tax rate may vary significantly depending on our stock price. The tax effects of the accounting for share-based compensation may significantly impact our effective tax rate from period to period. In periods in which our stock price is higher than the grant price of the share-based compensation vesting in that period, we will recognize excess tax benefits that will decrease our effective tax rate. In periods in which our stock price is lower than the grant price of the share-based compensation vesting in that period, our effective tax rate may increase. The amount and value of share-based compensation issued relative to our earnings in a particular period will also affect the magnitude of the impact of share-based compensation on our effective tax rate. These tax effects are dependent on our stock price, which we do not control, and a decline in our stock price could significantly increase our effective tax rate and adversely affect our financial results.

We are subject to a number of risks related to the credit card and debit card payments we accept.

We accept payments through credit and debit card transactions. For credit and debit card payments, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time. An increase in those fees may require us to increase the prices we charge and would increase our operating expenses, either of which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we or our processing vendors fail to maintain adequate systems for the authorization and processing of credit and debit card transactions, it could cause one or more of the major credit card companies to disallow our continued use of their payment products. In addition, if these systems fail to work properly and, as a result, we do not charge our customers’ credit or debit cards on a timely basis, or at all, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The payment methods that we offer also subject us to potential fraud and theft by criminals, who are becoming increasingly more sophisticated in exploiting weaknesses that may exist in the payment systems. If we fail to comply with applicable rules or requirements for the payment methods we accept, or if payment-related data is compromised due to a breach, we may be liable for significant costs incurred by payment card issuing banks and other third parties or subject to fines and higher transaction fees, or our ability to accept or facilitate certain types of payments may be impaired. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in certain payment types, which may result in a shift to other payment types or potential changes to our payment systems that may result in higher costs. If we fail to adequately control fraudulent credit card transactions, we may face civil liability, diminished public perception of our security measures and significantly higher card-related costs, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are also subject to payment card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it more difficult for us to comply. We are required to comply with payment card industry security standards. Failing to comply with those standards may violate payment card association operating rules, federal and state laws and regulations and the terms of our contracts with payment processors. Any failure to comply fully also may subject us to fines, penalties, damages and civil liability, and may result in the loss of our ability to accept credit and debit card payments. Further, there is no guarantee that such compliance will prevent illegal or improper use of our payment systems or the theft, loss or misuse of data pertaining to credit and debit cards, card holders and transactions.

If we are unable to maintain our chargeback rate or refund rates at acceptable levels, our processing vendor may increase our transaction fees or terminate its relationship with us. Any increases in our credit and debit card fees could harm our results of operations, particularly if we elect not to raise our rates for our products to offset the increase. The termination of our ability to process payments on any major credit or debit card would significantly impair our ability to operate our business.

Our information technology systems or those used by our third-party service providers, vendors, strategic partners or other contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security breaches and other disruptions, which could result in a material disruption of our products and services development programs, compromise sensitive information related to our business or prevent us from

51

accessing critical information, potentially exposing us to liability or otherwise adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We collect and maintain information in digital form that is necessary to conduct our business, and we are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business, including our cloud-based infrastructure, mobile and web-based applications, our e-commerce platform and our enterprise software. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information of customers and our employees and contractors. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We have also outsourced elements of our information technology infrastructure, and as a result a number of third-party vendors may or could have access to our confidential information. We do not conduct audits or formal evaluations of our third-party vendors’ information technology systems and cannot be sure that our third-party vendors have sufficient measures in place to ensure the security and integrity of their information technology systems and our confidential and proprietary information. If our third-party vendors fail to protect their information technology systems and our confidential and proprietary information, we may be vulnerable to disruptions in service and unauthorized access to our confidential or proprietary information and we could incur liability and reputational damage.

Our information technology systems and those of our third-party service providers, vendors, strategic partners and other contractors or consultants are vulnerable to attack and damage or interruption from computer viruses and malware (e.g., ransomware), natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, hacking, cyberattacks, phishing attacks and other social engineering schemes, malicious code, employee theft or misuse, denial or degradation of service attacks, sophisticated nation-state and nation-state-supported actors or unauthorized access or use by persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyberattacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or another war of international dispute (such as, for example, any escalation in geopolitical turmoil between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan) may cause a general increase in the number and severity of such malicious incidents. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and continued hybrid working environment, we may also face increased cybersecurity risks due to our reliance on internet technology and the number of our employees who are working remotely, which may create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities. Furthermore, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage, systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. We may also experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period. Even if identified, we may be unable to adequately investigate or remediate incidents or breaches due to attackers increasingly using tools and techniques that are designed to circumvent controls, to avoid detection, and to remove or obfuscate forensic evidence.

The costs to us to investigate and mitigate network security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs, ransomware, and security vulnerabilities could be significant, and while we have implemented security measures to protect our data security and information technology systems from system failure, accident and security breach, our efforts to address these problems may not be successful, and these problems could result in unexpected interruptions, delays, disruption of our development programs and our business operations, cessation of service, negative publicity and other harm to our business and our competitive position, whether due to a loss of our trade secrets or other proprietary information or other disruptions. We and certain of our vendors and service providers are from time to time subject to cyberattacks and security incidents. While we do not believe that we have experienced any significant system failure, accident or security breach to date, if we were to experience a significant breach of our information systems or data, the costs associated with the investigation, remediation and potential notification of the breach to counterparties and data subjects could be material. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology and cybersecurity infrastructure, we could suffer significant business disruption, including transaction errors, supply chain or manufacturing interruptions, processing inefficiencies, data loss or the loss of or damage to intellectual property or other proprietary information. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations, whether due to a loss, corruption or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets, personal information or other proprietary or sensitive information or other similar disruptions.

If a security breach or other incident were to result in the unauthorized access to or unauthorized use, disclosure, release or other processing of personal information, it may be necessary to notify individuals, governmental authorities, supervisory bodies, the media and other parties pursuant to applicable privacy and security laws. For example, the Company retains data that is subject to HIPAA, which contain specific security and notification requirements to which we must adhere. Any security compromise affecting us, our service providers, vendors, strategic partners, other contractors, consultants, or our industry, whether real or perceived, could harm our reputation, erode confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures and lead to regulatory scrutiny. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or systems, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary or personal information, we could incur liability, including litigation exposure, penalties and fines, we could become the subject of regulatory action or investigation, our competitive position could be harmed and the further development and commercialization of our products and services could be delayed. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our business. Furthermore, federal, state and international laws and regulations can expose us to enforcement actions and investigations by regulatory authorities, and potentially result in regulatory penalties, fines and significant legal liability, if our information technology security efforts fail. We would also be exposed to a risk of loss or

52

litigation and potential liability, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations or prospects. Further, any losses, costs or liabilities may not be covered by, or may exceed the coverage limits of, any applicable insurance policies.

International trade disputes could result in tariffs and other protectionist measures that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Tariffs could increase the cost of our products and the raw materials that go into making them. These increased costs could adversely impact the gross margin that we earn on our products. Tariffs could also make our products more expensive for customers, which could make our products less competitive and reduce consumer demand. Countries may also adopt other protectionist measures that could limit our ability to offer our products. Political uncertainty surrounding international trade disputes and protectionist measures (including as a result of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the various sanctions and export controls being implemented by the international community against Russia, as well as any escalating geopolitical turmoil between the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan) could also have a negative effect on consumer confidence and spending, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to continue to drive consumers to our website, it could cause our revenue to decrease.

Many consumers find our website by searching for hearing aid information through internet search engines or from word-of-mouth and personal recommendations. A critical factor in attracting visitors to our website is how prominently we are displayed in response to search queries. Accordingly, we use search engine marketing as a means to provide a significant portion of our customer acquisition. Search engine marketing includes both paid website visitor acquisition on a cost-per-click basis and visitor acquisition on an unpaid basis, often referred to as organic or algorithmic search.

One method we employ to acquire visitors via organic search is commonly known as search engine optimization (“SEO”). SEO involves developing our website in a way that enables the website to rank high for search queries for which our website’s content may be relevant. We also rely heavily on favorable recommendations from our existing customers to help drive traffic to our website. If our website is listed less prominently or fails to appear in search result listings for any reason, it is likely that we will attract fewer visitors to our website, which could adversely affect our revenue.

Disruptions in internet access, or in cloud-based hosting services from certain third parties, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As an online business, we are dependent on the internet and maintaining connectivity between ourselves and consumers and sources of internet traffic, such as Google. As consumers increasingly turn to mobile devices, we also become dependent on consumers’ access to the internet through mobile carriers and their systems. Disruptions in internet access, whether generally, in a specific market or otherwise, especially if widespread or prolonged, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, the “denial-of-service” attack against Dyn in October 2016 resulted in a service outage for several major internet companies. It is possible that we could experience an interruption in our business, and we do not carry business interruption insurance sufficient to compensate us for all losses that may occur.

Additionally, we rely on third-party service providers to host our data and to provide services to key aspects of our operations, including production, logistics, delivery and customer services and databases as well as employee and payroll services. We do not control the operations, physical security, or data security of any of these third parties. Despite our efforts to use commercially reasonable diligence in the selection and retention of such third-party providers, such efforts may be insufficient or inadequate to prevent or remediate such risks. Our third-party providers, including our cloud computing providers, may be subject to intrusions, computer viruses, denial-of-service attacks, sabotage, acts of vandalism, acts of terrorism, and other misconduct. They are vulnerable to damage or interruption from power loss, telecommunications failures, fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and similar events, and they may be subject to financial, legal, regulatory, and labor issues, each of which may impose additional costs or requirements on us or prevent these third parties from providing services to us or our customers on our behalf.

In addition, these third parties may breach their agreements with us, disagree with our interpretation of contract terms or applicable laws and regulations, refuse to continue or renew these agreements on commercially reasonable terms or at all, fail to or refuse to process transactions or provide other services adequately, take actions that degrade functionality, increase prices, impose additional costs or requirements on us or our customers, or give preferential treatment to our competitors. If we are unable to procure alternatives in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms, or at all, we may be subject to business disruptions, losses, or costs to remediate any of these deficiencies. The occurrence of any of the above events could result in reputational damage, legal or regulatory proceedings, or other adverse consequences, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

53

Changes in the regulation of the internet could adversely affect our business.

Laws, rules and regulations governing internet communications, advertising and e-commerce are dynamic, and the extent of future government regulation is uncertain. Federal and state regulations govern various aspects of our online business, including intellectual property ownership and infringement, trade secrets, the distribution of electronic communications, marketing and advertising, user privacy and data security, search engines and internet tracking technologies. Future taxation on the use of the internet or e-commerce transactions could also be imposed. Existing or future regulation or taxation could increase our operating expenses and expose us to significant liabilities. To the extent any such regulations require us to take actions that negatively impact us, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Jose, California. We leased approximately 30,000 square feet of office and laboratory space pursuant to a lease agreement which was effective as of July 30, 2018 and expired on February 28, 2022. We entered into a new lease agreement in September 2021 for approximately 30,000 square feet of office and laboratory space, which we began using as our headquarters starting in February 2022. This lease expires on June 30, 2029 and we may renew the lease term for two additional 60-month periods.

We also lease approximately 9,327 square feet of office space, which is primarily used for our customer support operations, in Nashville, Tennessee, pursuant to a lease that expires on March 31, 2023. We believe that our existing facilities are adequate to meet our business requirements for the near-term, and that additional space will be available on commercially reasonable terms, if required. We entered into a new lease agreement in January 2023 for approximately 17,572 square feet of office space at a new location in Nashville, Tennessee, for which the lease term will commence on the later of (i) April 1, 2023 or (ii) the date of substantial completion of certain tenant improvements in accordance with the terms of the lease (the “Commencement Date”). This lease will expire after a 76-month period following the Commencement Date.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The information required to be set forth under this Item 3 is incorporated by reference to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

54

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market information for common stock

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “EAR”. Public trading of our common stock began on October 16, 2020. Prior to that, there was no public market for our common stock.

Stockholders

As of March 20, 2023, there were 67 holders of record of our common stock. The actual number of stockholders is greater than this number of record holders, and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners, but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees. This number of holders of record also does not include stockholders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.

Dividend policy

We have never declared or paid, and do not anticipate declaring or paying in the foreseeable future, any cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws and will depend on then existing conditions, including our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects, and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

The following table provides information on our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2022. Information is included for equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders.

55

Use of proceeds from public offering of common stock

On October 20, 2020, we completed our initial public offering (the “IPO”) and issued 451,481 shares of our common stock, which includes an additional 58,888 shares of common stock purchased by the underwriters pursuant to their option to purchase additional shares, in each case, on a post-reverse stock split basis, at an initial offering price of $360.0 per share less underwriting discounts and commissions. We received net proceeds from the IPO of approximately $148.5 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $11.4 million and offering costs of $2.6 million. None of the expenses associated with the IPO were paid to directors, officers, persons owning 10% or more of any class of equity securities, or to their associates. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and BofA Securities, Inc. acted as book-running managers for the IPO.

Shares of our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on October 16, 2020. The offer and sale of the shares were registered under the Securities Act on a registration statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-249075), which was declared effective on October 15, 2020.

All the proceeds from our IPO have been applied in the manner described in the related prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act.

Sales of unregistered securities

None.

Issuer purchases of equity securities

None.

Item 6. [Reserved].

56

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking statements about us and our industry that involve substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this item, including statements regarding factors affecting our business, trends and uncertainties, are forward-looking statements. As a result of many factors, including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by these forward-looking statements. You should carefully read the “Risk Factors” to gain an understanding of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a medical device company dedicated to improving the quality of life of people with hearing loss. Our innovative products and go-to-market approach address the major challenges of traditional hearing aid adoption, including social stigma, accessibility and cost.

We believe our Eargo hearing aids are the first ever virtually invisible, rechargeable, completely in-the-canal, FDA-regulated devices indicated to compensate for mild to moderate hearing loss. Our rapid pace of innovation is enabled by our deep industry and technical expertise across mechanical engineering, product design, audio processing, clinical and hearing science, consumer electronics and embedded software design, and is supported by our strategic intellectual property portfolio.

We market and sell our hearing aids primarily in a direct-to-consumer format with a personalized, consumer-centric approach. Our commercial organization consists of a marketing team with deep experience in consumer-focused brand and performance marketing, a team of inside sales consultants, and a dedicated customer support team.

We believe that our differentiated hearing aids and consumer-oriented approach have fueled the rapid adoption of our hearing aids and high customer satisfaction, as evidenced by over 109,000 Eargo hearing aid systems shipped, net of returns, as of December 31, 2022. To date, all our revenue has been generated from customers in the United States.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, we generated net revenue of $37.2 million, an increase of $5.1 million from the year ended December 31, 2021. Our gross systems shipped during the year ended December 31, 2022 were 24,247, compared to 45,136 during 2021. The decrease in shipment volume was largely driven by our decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded adjustments that materially reduced net revenue as discussed in detail below under “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits.”

Our net losses were $157.5 million, $157.8 million and $39.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $514.3 million and $356.8 million, respectively. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of $101.2 million, which are available to fund operations. As of December 31, 2022, we had no debt outstanding.

DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits

As previously disclosed, on September 21, 2021, we were informed that we were the target of a criminal investigation by the DOJ related to insurance claims we submitted for reimbursement on behalf of our customers covered by various federal employee health plans under the Federal Employee Health Benefits (“FEHB”) program, which is administered by the Office of Personnel Management (the “OPM”). The investigation also pertained to our role in claim submissions to federal employee health plans (collectively, the “DOJ investigation”). Total payments the Company received from the government in relation to claims submitted under the FEHB program, as subject to the DOJ investigation, net of any product returns and associated refunds, were approximately $44.0 million. Also as previously disclosed, the third-party payor with whom historically we had the largest volume, which is one of the carriers contracted with the OPM under the FEHB program (“largest third-party payor”), conducted an audit of insurance claims for reimbursement (“claims”) submitted by us (the “Primary Audit”), which included a review of medical records. We were informed by the third-party payor conducting the Primary Audit that the DOJ was the principal contact related to the subject matter of the Primary Audit. In addition to the Primary Audit, we have been subject to a number of other claims audits by additional third-party payors (collectively with the Primary Audit, the “claims audits”). One of these claims audits did not relate to claims submitted under the FEHB program. On January 4, 2022, the DOJ confirmed to us that the investigation had been referred to the Civil Division of the DOJ and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas and the criminal investigation was no longer active.

On April 29, 2022, we entered into a civil settlement agreement with the U.S. government that resolved the previously disclosed DOJ investigation related to our role in claim submissions to various federal employee health plans under the FEHB program. We cooperated fully with the DOJ investigation. We deny the allegations in the settlement agreement, and the settlement is not an

57

admission of liability by us. The allegations did not pertain to the quality or performance of our product. The settlement agreement provided for our payment of approximately $34.4 million to the U.S. government and resolved allegations that we submitted or caused the submission of claims for payment to the FEHB program using unsupported hearing loss-related diagnostic codes. As discussed further in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, based on the settlement agreement with the U.S. government, we recorded a settlement liability of $34.4 million in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021. The settlement amount was recorded as a reduction of revenue in the third quarter of 2021. On May 2, 2022, we paid the settlement amount.

The settlement with the U.S. government may not resolve all of the claims audits initiated by various third-party payors, and additionally we remain subject to a prepayment review of claims by the payor who conducted the Primary Audit.

From the time we learned of the DOJ investigation and until December 8, 2021, we continued to process orders for customers with potential insurance benefits (including FEHB program members) but suspended all claims submission activities and offered affected customers (i.e., customers using insurance benefits as a method of direct payment for transactions prior to December 8, 2021) the option to return their hearing aids or purchase their hearing aids without the use of their insurance benefits in case their claim was denied or ultimately not submitted by us to their insurance plan for payment (the “extended right of return”).

From December 8, 2021 until September 15, 2022, we did not accept insurance benefits as a method of direct payment.

We determined that customer transactions using insurance benefits as a method of direct payment occurring between September 21, 2021 (when we learned of the DOJ investigation) and December 8, 2021 (when we temporarily stopped accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment) did not meet the criteria for revenue recognition and, as a result, we did not recognize revenue for shipments within that timeframe to customers with potential insurance benefits, substantially all of whom were covered under the FEHB program.

We previously estimated that a majority of customers with unsubmitted claims would choose to return the hearing aid system if their insurance provider denied their claim or the claim was ultimately not submitted by us for payment, resulting in an increase in expected product returns from sales transactions that occurred prior to September 21, 2021 and recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021. Returns associated with unsubmitted claims reduce the sales returns reserve, with a corresponding reduction in the related accounts receivable at the time the product is returned.

We also estimated that, in addition to the customers who chose to return their hearing aid systems, a significant number of customers whose claims were denied by payors or not submitted by us for payment would not pay for or return the hearing aid system, resulting in bad debt expense that was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, we made the determination not to seek payment for approximately $16.1 million from customers with unsubmitted and unpaid claims. We accounted for this decision as a pricing concession (the “Pricing Concession”) and, during the year ended December 31, 2022 recorded a $16.1 million reduction to our insurance-related accounts receivable balance along with related reduction to net revenue of $11.6 million and an allowance for credit losses balance of $4.5 million for such unsubmitted and unpaid claims. Further, we simultaneously recorded a decrease in our insurance-related sales return reserve of $11.3 million, with a corresponding increase of $11.3 million to net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 related to unsubmitted and unpaid claims. These changes resulted in a decrease in net revenue of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

On January 5, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California consolidated three purported securities class actions brought against the Company (as consolidated, the “Securities Class Action”). On May 20, 2022, the lead plaintiffs in the Securities Class Action filed a consolidated amended complaint, which generally alleges that certain of the Company’s disclosures about its business, operations and prospects, including reimbursement from third-party payors, violated federal securities laws. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on July 29, 2022. The Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on February 14, 2023, and the plaintiffs have until March 16, 2023, to file a second amended complaint.

On August 4, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California consolidated two verified shareholder derivative complaints brought against certain of our executive officers and current and former members of our board of directors (as consolidated, the “Derivative Action”). The court stayed the consolidated Derivative Action until the resolution of the motion to dismiss the Securities Class Action. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.

58

As a result of the uncertainty created by the DOJ investigation and the claims audits, we took certain actions including, but not limited to:

Patient Square Capital Investment

On June 24, 2022, after reviewing all available alternatives to secure the funding needed to support our ongoing operations and pursuit of our business strategies, and a potential sale of the Company, we entered into an agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with PSC Echo, LP (the “PSC Stockholder”), an affiliate of Patient Square Capital (“Patient Square”), and Drivetrain Agency Services, LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, we issued approximately $105.5 million in two tranches of senior secured convertible notes (the “Notes”) and agreed to conduct a rights offering for an aggregate of 18.75 million shares of common stock to stockholders as of a record date determined by our Board, at an offering price of $10.0 per share of common stock (the “Rights Offering”). Pursuant to the Rights Offering, which closed on November 23, 2022, we sold an aggregate of approximately 2.9 million shares to our existing stockholders, from which we received net proceeds of $27.6 million, and, in accordance with the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement, the Notes converted into 15,821,299 shares of our common stock (the “Conversion Shares”), in each case, on a post-reverse stock split basis, representing approximately 76.3% of our outstanding common stock as of the date of conversion.

In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, we had also entered into an Investors’ Rights Agreement with the PSC Stockholder, pursuant to which, among other things, the PSC Stockholder has the right to nominate a number of directors to our Board that is proportionate to the PSC Stockholder’s ownership of the Company, rounded up to the nearest whole number (and which shall in no event be less than one). As a result, following the closing of the Rights Offering and the conversion of the Notes, the PSC Stockholder has the right to nominate six directors to our Board. The PSC Stockholder exercised its right to nominate three directors to the Board, Trit Garg, M.D., Karr Narula and Justin Sabet-Peyman, in December 2022.

As of March 20, 2023, the PSC Stockholder held 15,821,299 shares, representing approximately 76.3% of our outstanding common stock. As a result of Patient Square’s ownership position, we are considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of the marketplace rules (the “Listing Rules”) of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) and Patient Square may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval.

Reverse Stock Split

On October 12, 2022, at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock, at a ratio in the range of 1-for-5 to 1-for-50, with such ratio to be determined by the Board. On January 11, 2023, we announced that the Board had approved a 1-for-20 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”), and on January 17, 2023, the Reverse Stock Split was effected. Our common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on January 18, 2023. All share and per share information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.

59

Factors affecting our business

Our business priorities include: (i) accessing insurance coverage for Eargo hearing aids, including potentially regaining insurance coverage of Eargo hearing aids for government employees under the FEHB program; (ii) refining and expanding our retail strategy; (iii) optimizing our cash-pay business; and (iv) continuing to invest in innovation. We believe that our future performance will depend on many factors, including those described below and in the section titled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our direct-to-consumer and omni-channel business model

We sell our hearing aids primarily on a direct-to-consumer basis, engaging consumers through a mix of digital and traditional marketing as well as select commercial partnership, omni-channel (including retail) and other opportunities that are designed to appeal to prospective customers on a personal level and build our brand.

Via our direct-to-consumer model, customers are able to complete purchases over the phone with an Eargo sales consultant or directly on our website. The Eargo purchasing experience is designed to be simple and to improve the accessibility of hearing aids.

Following the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) final rule regarding the creation of a new category of over-the-counter (“OTC”) hearing aids (the “OTC Final Rule”), we have focused efforts on transitioning to the new OTC framework and exploring select additional commercial partnerships, omni-channel (including retail) and other opportunities. For example, we have a commercial arrangement with Victra, one of America’s largest wireless retailers, to facilitate access to our hearing screeners and demonstrate our devices at approximately 1,500 Victra store locations across the country; customers are also able to purchase or order Eargo hearing aids at such store locations. We believe that the OTC Final Rule may facilitate the opportunity to execute additional commercial partnerships, expanding our customers’ ability to learn about our hearing aids, obtain general information about their hearing through our current hearing screeners, and experience our devices in person prior to purchasing or ordering directly at retail locations.

Moreover, following the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, we have partnered with certain resellers and other distributors, including benefits managers, to offer Eargo hearing aids for sale through their online storefronts or portals. Under these partnerships, we sell Eargo hearing aids to resellers at wholesale prices, who in turn offer our products to end-customers through their respective online storefronts or portals. Generally, we fulfill and ship orders placed through these online storefronts or portals directly to end-customers, and we generally do not submit insurance claims on behalf of customers who purchase from one of these authorized resellers, including Victra. We believe these partnerships will help expand consumer access to our hearing aids and allow us to target high-intent customers more efficiently. We continue to look for additional partners to help expand our customer base.

Once a customer purchases Eargo hearing aids, whether directly through us or through one of our partners, distributors, or authorized resellers, they are assigned to one of our hearing professionals, who provides complimentary, convenient support by phone, chat or e-mail. Our hearing professionals and customer care team are also available to provide unlimited support for as long as the customer owns an Eargo device. Additionally, we provide short, online training videos and other resources that customers can access online. The combination of these services allows us to deliver remote customer support in an efficient and streamlined manner.

We believe our business model and consumer-centric focus offer certain advantages relative to traditional sales channels (which are characterized by a business-to-business model in which hearing aid manufacturers rely on a fragmented network of independent audiology clinics to sell their devices to consumers), including in particular the convenience and accessibility of our remote customer support as well as our consumer-centric focus. We offer free online education, convenient consultation and remote customer support, the ability to easily purchase the Eargo system, and fast delivery.

Changes to the regulatory landscape

Hearing aids are considered medical devices subject to regulation by the FDA. On August 17, 2022, the FDA published the OTC Final Rule, which established new regulatory categories for OTC and prescription hearing aids. The OTC Final Rule implements relevant provisions of the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (“FDARA”), which set forth requirements for the FDA to create a new category of OTC hearing aids that are intended to be available without supervision, prescription, or other order, involvement or intervention of a licensed practitioner. Prior to the effective date of the OTC Final Rule, no OTC category of hearing aids existed. Following publication of a proposed rule in October 2021, the FDA issued its OTC Final Rule with requirements for labelling, conditions of sale, performance standards, design requirements and other provisions under which manufacturers may elect to market hearing aids as either OTC or prescription devices, or both. In addition, under FDARA, the OTC hearing aid controls promulgated in the OTC Final Rule preempt any state or local requirement specifically related to hearing products that would restrict or interfere with commercial activity involving OTC hearing aids. The OTC Final Rule became effective on October 17, 2022, although certain previously marketed devices have until April 14, 2023 to come into compliance with the OTC Final Rule.

We have marketed in the past, and continue to market, certain Eargo system devices as Class I air-conduction or Class II wireless air-conduction hearing aids under existing regulations at 21 CFR 874.330 and 874.3305, respectively, both of which are exempt from 510(k) premarket review. In June 2022, we submitted a 510(k) premarket notification seeking FDA clearance of expanded labelling

60

for our Eargo 5 and Eargo 6 hearing aids under the “self-fitting” regulation at 21 CFR 874.3323. In December 2022, we received FDA 510(k) clearance for Eargo 5 and Eargo 6 as Class II self-fitting air-conduction hearing aids. Additionally, in January 2023, we launched the Eargo 7 as our third over-the-counter, 510(k) cleared self-fitting device. We plan to market our devices as OTC hearing aids and intend to comply with all applicable OTC regulatory requirements as of the compliance date for currently marketed devices on April 14, 2023, or sooner. We may also seek to market certain devices as prescription hearing aids, which would require compliance with separate physical and electronic labeling requirements under the OTC Final Rule.

In connection with the OTC Final Rule, we have expended, and will continue to expend, significant time and resources evaluating the OTC Final Rule and ensuring that our devices and processes comply with the new requirements in order to market our products in line with our primary direct-to-consumer business and omni-channel models. It is possible that the OTC Final Rule may lead to additional commercial partnership, omni-channel, including retail, or other opportunities, although there are no assurances that it will do so. The OTC Final Rule and the responses thereto by leading insurance providers could also materially impact our efforts to resume submitting claims for customers with potential insurance benefits or have other unforeseen impacts on our business and results of operations.

Please see the Risk Factors titled, “Changes in the regulatory landscape for hearing aid devices could materially impact our direct-to-consumer business model and lead to increased regulatory requirements, and we may be required to seek additional clearance or approval for our products” and “Our hearing aids are subject to extensive government regulation at the federal and state level, and our failure to comply with applicable requirements could harm our business” for more information.

Insurance-related business

A significant portion of our revenue has historically been dependent on payments from third-party payors; for example, in the year ended December 31, 2021, 44% of total gross systems shipped were to customers with potential insurance coverage. Historically, we submitted claims on behalf of our customers to a concentrated number of third-party payors under certain benefit plans, and substantially all such claims related to the FEHB program. See “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits” for a discussion of the DOJ investigation and settlement as well as claims audits prior to the resumption of our insurance claims submissions practices in September 2022.

Between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022, we did not accept insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to the Company, a practice we refer to as “direct plan access.” In “direct plan access,” we submit an insurance claim on behalf of an Eargo customer to their insurance plan, or support an Eargo customer in their own claim submission, and the customer’s insurance benefits are utilized for the purchase, in whole or in part. Common forms of utilization can include, but are not limited to, co-pay, payment by a third-party payor to either Eargo or the customer, reimbursement by a third-party payor to the customer, or application toward a customer’s deductible.

Because we do not currently have contracts with any FEHB carriers, third-party payors, or other insurance providers, our products are considered out-of-network with such payors and insurance providers. We do not believe that the reimbursement amounts, patient co-payment amounts, or the claims submission process, including medical necessity and other documentation requirements, depend on whether we are in-network or out-of-network with that FEHB carrier or other FEHB plans. To illustrate, the hearing aid benefit in an FEHB plan is a set amount that covers the hearing aid itself and related fees and supplies, regardless of the plan option and regardless of whether the hearing aid is provided by a preferred, participating, or non-participating provider (i.e., regardless of whether it is in-network or out-of-network), which is not always the case for other benefit categories. However, depending on the FEHB carrier or third-party payor, payment may be made directly to the patient rather than to us if Eargo is out-of-network.

Beginning on September 15, 2022, we resumed our direct plan access insurance-based business, accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in certain limited circumstances, when the customer has undergone additional testing by an independent, licensed healthcare provider to establish medical necessity, with supporting clinical documentation. We are evaluating additional alternatives for testing or establishing medical necessity, including, but not limited to, contracting with third parties or existing networks of licensed healthcare providers, and/or establishing a management services organization, separate from our existing corporate structure, that manages professional entities that employ licensed healthcare providers. These alternatives involve significant time and related activities, including, but not limited to, development of additional internal processes, training, and compliance and quality control programs, coordination with external healthcare providers and professional services organizations, and evaluation of and compliance with state-by-state regulatory requirements. We cannot provide any assurance as to the efficacy of the processes that we have established or the extent to which such processes will need to be changed, or additional processes established, or the associated timing or costs, whether we will be successful in implementing any of them, or the impact that such processes and changes may have on our business and operations. If we are unable to successfully implement at least one of these alternatives for testing, or to otherwise establish additional acceptable processes to support claims that we may submit for reimbursement, we expect that we may not be able to submit future claims in sufficient volume to meaningfully restore or expand the amount of our insurance-based business related to direct plan access. In addition, it is possible that such testing would be required to be conducted in-person, representing a significant change from our past processes and customer experience that may adversely impact the attractiveness of our offerings to customers, and we may not be able to efficiently or effectively integrate such tests into our operating model. Further, the OTC Final

61

Rule may lead payors to take additional actions, such as excluding OTC hearing aids from coverage, further limiting our ability to access insurance coverage, or there may be a delay in accessing insurance coverage as payors seek to address the OTC Final Rule in their offered benefits, if at all, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are also seeking to establish relationships with benefits managers or managed care providers. Employer self-funded plans or other health plans may at times offer supplemental benefits, which may include hearing aid benefits or general “over-the-counter” benefits; they may in those cases contract with benefits managers or managed care providers in the administration of such supplemental benefits. In this role, among other things, benefits managers are responsible for selecting benefits vendors, i.e., vendors whose products or services are eligible to be covered by the supplemental benefit. The vendors themselves, or Eargo in this role, are not responsible for claims submissions but instead fulfill the product order from the customer through the benefits manager.

We cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to maintain or increase our participation in arrangements with third-party payors, insurance carriers, benefits managers, or managed care providers or that we will be adequately reimbursed or otherwise paid by such parties for the products we sell, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In light of the DOJ investigation, claims audits and the OTC Final Rule, we have made and may continue to need to make significant changes to our business and operating model, including a potential long-term shift to a model without a meaningful insurance-related business, which would likely result in a sustained increased cost of customer acquisition and require identification of commercial partnership, omni-channel, including retail, or other opportunities, to drive cost efficient acquisition of customers.

See “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits” for more information. Please see the Risk Factors titled, “We are subject to risks from legal proceedings, investigations, and inquiries, including a number of recent legal proceedings and investigations, which have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, and could result in additional claims and material liabilities,” and “We face considerable uncertainty in our business prospects, as a significant portion of our revenue has historically been dependent upon reimbursement from third-party payors participating in the FEHB program, but we have operated on a primarily “cash-pay” basis since December 8, 2021. We may be unsuccessful in validating and establishing processes to support the submission of claims for reimbursement from third-party payors participating in the FEHB program in the future. As a result, we have faced a significant reduction in revenue and any failure to establish processes to support reimbursement from third-party payors in the future may significantly and adversely impact our business and growth prospects and our ability to sell our products.”

Efficient acquisition of new customers

We have spent significant amounts on sales and marketing designed to build a strong brand, achieve broad awareness of our Eargo system, acquire new customers and convert sales leads. Since our public disclosure of the DOJ investigation on September 22, 2021 and our related decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022, we have experienced and may continue to experience a material decline in sales and gross systems shipped.

From December 8, 2021 until September 15, 2022, as a result of the DOJ investigation and claims audits (as further described in “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits”), we did not accept insurance as a direct method of payment to the Company (referred to as “direct plan access”). Instead, all sales within such timeframe were to customers we refer to as “cash-pay” or “self-pay” customers, which includes upfront payment, credit card, third-party financing, and third-party distributor, authorized reseller or partner payments. We have refocused our sales and marketing efforts and related spend to prioritize conversion of cash-pay consumer leads into satisfied customers. While we intend to continue to work with third-party payors with the objective of validating and establishing additional processes to support any future claims that we may submit for reimbursement, we may not be able to arrive at additional acceptable processes or submit future claims in sufficient volume to meaningfully restore or expand our insurance-based business. The shift to a primarily “cash-pay” model, with minimal volume from our customers using insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to Eargo, will likely result in a sustained increased cost of customer acquisition and require significant sales and marketing investments, based on the historically lower conversion rate for cash-pay customers as compared to direct plan access insurance customers. We anticipate that our expansion into retail locations may allow for a more streamlined sales process; however, it may not ultimately reduce our cost of customer acquisition due to new sales and marketing initiatives related to such expansion. We are currently unable to predict whether our expansion into retail locations will affect the return rate for our cash-pay customers, and the impact any such change may have on our cost of customer acquisition. Further, the low volume of direct plan access insurance customers using insurance as a direct payment method may also necessitate identifying commercial partnerships, omni-channel, including retail, or other opportunities, as well as the potential implementation of cost-savings measures, in order to drive cost-efficient cash-pay customer acquisition and offset the significantly higher return rates as well as the related negative impact on revenue and gross margin historically applicable to cash-pay customers.

62

Sales returns rate

Our return policy generally allows our customers to return hearing aids for any reason within the first 45 days of delivery for a full refund, subject to a handling fee in certain states, and can be extended under certain circumstances, including, for example, the previously extended right of return offered for shipments made prior to 2022 involving insurance payors. Historically, the most commonly cited reason for returning our hearing aids is unsatisfactory fit, which we believe is a by-product of our direct-to-consumer model and online distribution that results in nearly all of our customers ordering our product without trying it first. In addition to unsatisfactory fit, the next most cited reason for returns is that our hearing aids do not provide sufficient audio amplification.

We report revenue net of expected returns, which is an estimate informed in part by historical return rates. As such, our returns rate impacts our reported net revenue and gross profit or loss. Sales returns rates, as defined under “—Key business metrics,” were 34% and 32% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

New product introductions

Our technical capabilities and commitment to innovation have allowed us to deliver product enhancements on a rapid development timeline and support a compelling new product roadmap that we believe will continue to differentiate our competitive position over the next several years. With the full commercial launch of the Eargo 7 in February 2023, we have now launched seven generations of our hearing aids since 2017, with each iteration having increased functionality and improved sound quality, amplification, noise reduction, physical fit, comfort, water resistance and ease-of-use, as well as reduced costs of goods and better connectivity. We are focused on continuing to launch new versions of the Eargo hearing aid devices that further improve these attributes. We believe that the continued introduction of new products is critical to maintaining existing customers, attracting new customers, achieving market acceptance of our products and maintaining or increasing our competitive position in the market.

We expect to continue refining and improving Eargo hearing aids, and we have the intention of an approximate annual cadence of new product launches. To this end, we are working on the development of a cost-conscious offering as well as the next Eargo hearing aid model with improved functionality. Accordingly, we expect to continue to invest in research and development to support new product introductions. In connection with our product innovation and iteration, we also need to successfully manage our product transitions to avoid delays in customer purchases, excess or obsolete inventory and increased returns as customers wait for our new products to become available. Our development priorities are focused, in part, on expanding refurbishment capability for returned hearing aids. Our refurbishment capabilities are focused on components and allow us to reuse certain key components from our returned devices.

Recruitment and retention of personnel

Our success depends in part upon our continued ability to recruit, retain and motivate high-quality employees, including management, administrative, our clinical and scientific personnel and our direct sales force (among others), and competition for qualified personnel can be intense due to the limited number of individuals possessing the requisite training, skill and experience we require. As a result of uncertainty created by the DOJ investigation and the claims audits, we temporarily suspended our practice of granting equity awards, suspended our employee stock purchase plan and deferred the settlement of outstanding restricted stock units, in each case effective as of November 9, 2021. We resumed granting RSUs on March 18, 2022 and resumed granting stock option awards on August 23, 2022. However, as of February 1, 2023, we have again suspended our practice of granting RSUs.

In addition, on December 7, 2021, we announced a plan to reduce our employee workforce to streamline our organization in response to declines in customer orders since we announced the DOJ investigation. We substantially completed the employee workforce reduction during the fourth quarter of 2021, resulting in a reduction of approximately 27% of our employee workforce, or approximately 90 people. On May 24, 2022, we announced a plan to further reduce our employee workforce as part of continued cost-cutting measures to reduce operating expenses and preserve capital. We substantially completed the employee workforce reduction during the second quarter of 2022, resulting in a reduction of approximately 17% of our employee workforce, or 44 people.

Future suspension of equity awards, including of our practice of granting RSUs, and reductions in workforce, in addition to any negative perceptions of employment with us as a result of the DOJ investigation, the settlement with the U.S. government, and the claims audits, could continue to adversely affect employee morale and have a material adverse impact on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate the high-quality employees critical to our operations, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Macroeconomic environment

Our business, results of operation and financial condition are dependent on macroeconomic conditions. We face domestic as well as global macroeconomic challenges, particularly in light of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, inflationary trends, uncertainty or volatility in the market (including recent and potential disruption in the banking system and financial markets) and geopolitical events (such as the conflict in Ukraine and tensions across the Taiwan Strait).

We believe the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the pace of consumer awareness of our vertically integrated remote customer support model and facilitated customer adoption of the same. Shelter-in-place restrictions and increased reluctance of consumers to conduct

63

in-person activities, particularly among older individuals that comprise a majority of the population needing hearing aids, resulted in increased knowledge of our business and sales and a potential acceleration of consumer acceptance of our primarily direct-to-consumer business model. However, we cannot be sure whether this trend in consumer behavior will persist or if consumers will instead return to pre-pandemic patterns. In addition, the benefits of such trends in consumer behavior, to the extent they persist, may be outweighed by other macroeconomic factors, including, but not limited to, inflationary pressures, financial market volatility, and slower growth or recession, which can adversely impact consumer confidence and result in lower discretionary consumer spending. If these macroeconomic pressures continue or increase, we may experience an adverse impact on demand for our products. Additionally, our business is also subject to disruptions in the banking system and financial markets and other uncertainties or volatility in the markets. For example, on March 10, 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) took control and was appointed receiver of Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). Although the FDIC ultimately announced that it would pay all deposits, including deposits that exceeded FDIC-insured amounts, we and other SVB customers initially were not able to access our accounts and faced significant uncertainty about whether and when we would be able to fully access amounts held through SVB, which would have had several follow-on consequences with respect to our ability to meet our near-term payment obligations. If other banks and financial institutions enter receivership or become insolvent in the future in response to financial conditions affecting the banking system and financial markets, our ability to access our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments may be threatened and could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. In addition, even if we lack exposure to the uncertainty or volatility of one or more financial institutions, the impact of financial institution volatility on our partners, customers or suppliers may also impact our business and financial condition.

We rely on a number of international suppliers and manufacturers, including our primary manufacturer, Pegatron Corporation, who is headquartered in Taiwan, which exposes us to foreign operational and political risks such as changes in trade policies and export regulations between the United States and other countries or geopolitical conflict. Additionally, although we believe the COVID-19 pandemic has largely resulted in favorable consumer trends for our business, travel restrictions, factory closures and disruptions in global supply chains have resulted in industry-wide component supply shortages (such as in semiconductors), and we may not be able to obtain adequate inventory on a timely basis or at all. To date, increases in component pricing have occurred but have not had a material impact on supply continuity or gross margin. We have taken steps to monitor our supply chain and actions to address limited supply and increasing lead times, including outreach to critical suppliers and spot market purchases. While we have not experienced any significant disruptions to our supply chain that have impacted our ability to service customers or our access to necessary raw materials and component parts for the manufacture of our products to date, disruptions have occurred across a number of industries and we cannot provide any assurance that future disruptions will not emerge as a result of the ongoing supply chain issues, inflation, the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical events or other extrinsic factors. Future disruptions in our supply chain, including the sourcing of certain components and raw materials, such as semiconductor and memory chips, as well as increased logistics costs, could impact our revenue and gross margins.

For a further discussion of trends, uncertainties and other factors that could impact our operating results, see the section titled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Key business metrics

To analyze our business performance, determine financial forecasts and help develop long-term strategic plans, we review the following key business metrics, each of which is an important measure that represents the state of our business:

64

The following table details the number of gross systems shipped and sales returns rates for the periods presented below:

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, Eargo shipped 24,247 and 45,136 gross hearing aid systems, respectively, of which less than 1% and 44%, respectively, were to customers with potential insurance coverage. We made the decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022. Beginning September 2022, we resumed accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in certain limited circumstances and for which revenue is and has been recognized. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2022, we shipped Eargo hearing devices to Victra, our retail partner, for in-person customer sales at its approximately 1,500 store locations across the United States, for which we recognize revenue upon shipment to our retail partner.

We believe these key business metrics provide useful information to help investors understand and evaluate our business performance. Gross systems shipped is a key measure of sales volume, which drives potential revenue, while sales returns rates are an indicator of expected reductions to revenue and an indicator of change in customer mix and factors affecting the returns rates by customer type. However, as discussed elsewhere in this report, our sales volume, sales returns rate and revenue during the current period were not consistent with the prior periods as a result of the DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits. See “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits.”

Due to the historically higher return rate for cash-pay customers as compared to insurance customers, we expect that revenue, gross profit and gross margin may remain depressed as compared to prior periods for so long as there is minimal volume from our customers using insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to Eargo; however, we are currently unable to predict whether the expansion of our omni-channel strategy (including retail and other partners) will affect our return rate for cash-pay customers, and the impact any such change may have on our revenue, gross profit and gross margin.

Components of our results of operations

See the discussion under “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits,” which describes a variety of circumstances currently affecting our business and results of operations, and which require that we continually evaluate and adapt our business model and expenditures as new information becomes available.

Revenue, net

We generate revenue primarily from the sale of Eargo hearing aid systems. We market a variety of models of hearing aids, each at different price points, and we periodically offer discounts and promotions, including holiday promotions. For product sales, control is transferred upon shipment to the customer. We report revenue net of expected returns, which is an estimate informed in part by historical return rates.

Since learning of the DOJ investigation, we temporarily suspended all insurance claims submissions and, from December 8, 2021 until September 15, 2022, did not accept insurance as a direct method of payment. Instead, we focused our efforts on cash-pay customers, which includes upfront payment, credit card payments, third-party financed payments and distributor payments. Historically, cash-pay customers have had significantly higher return rates than customers with potential insurance benefits, and therefore the potential long-term shift to primarily cash-pay sales may adversely impact revenue, net. Beginning on September 15, 2022, we resumed accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in certain limited circumstances.

Cost of revenue and gross margin

Cost of revenue consists of expenses associated with the cost of finished goods, freight, personnel costs, consumables, product warranty costs, transaction fees, reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, depreciation and amortization, and related overhead.

Our gross margin has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including sales volumes, product mix, channel mix, pricing strategies, sales returns rates, costs of finished goods, product warranty claim rates and refurbishment strategies, and our ability to service insurance customers and any potential actions insurance providers may take following the implementation of the FDA’s new OTC hearing aid regulatory framework that may limit our ability to access insurance coverage.

We expect our gross margin to remain depressed for so long as there is minimal volume from our customers using insurance benefits as a direct method of payment to Eargo, unless we can successfully target and convert new customers with a similarly low rate of return.

65

Research and development expenses

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses, consist primarily of engineering and product development costs to develop and support our products, regulatory expenses, non-recurring engineering and other costs associated with products and technologies that are in development, as well as related overhead costs. These expenses include personnel-related costs, including salaries and stock-based compensation, supplies, consulting fees, prototyping, testing, materials, travel expenses, depreciation and allocated facility overhead costs. Additionally, R&D expenses include internal and external costs associated with our regulatory compliance and quality assurance functions and related overhead costs.

Sales and marketing expenses

Our sales and marketing expenses have generally been the largest component of our operating expenses and consist primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries and stock-based compensation, direct and channel marketing, advertising and promotional expenses, consulting fees, public relations costs and allocated facility overhead costs. Sales and marketing personnel include our direct sales force consisting of inside sales consultants, hearing professionals, marketing professionals and related support personnel. We expect our sales and marketing expenses to fluctuate over time as a percentage of revenue. In response to the factors discussed in “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits,” we have reduced sales and marketing resources that were previously focused on insurance customers to prioritize the conversion of cash-pay consumers into satisfied customers, including the 2021 and 2022 reductions in force.

General and administrative expenses

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for executive, finance, legal, information technology and administrative personnel, including stock-based compensation. Other significant expenses include professional fees for legal and accounting services, transaction fees, consulting fees, recruiting fees, information technology costs, corporate insurance, bad debt expense, general corporate expenses and allocated facility overhead costs.

Excluding the costs associated with the DOJ investigation, we expect our general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars in future periods as a result of operating as a public company, including expenses related to compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and those of the Nasdaq Stock Market, additional insurance costs, investor relations activities and other administrative and professional services, as well as professional service and legal fees and expenses related to shareholder litigation that has been filed and that may be filed in the future.

Interest income

Interest income consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents.

Interest expense

Interest expense consists of interest related to borrowings under our debt obligations. In connection with the fair value option, we elected to present interest expense related to the Notes in the changes in fair value.

Change in fair value of convertible notes

We elected on issuance to account for the Notes at fair value until their settlement. The change in fair value of the convertible notes is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations, with the exception of changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk, which are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, if present.

Loss on extinguishment of debt

The loss on extinguishment of debt arose from the early repayment of long-term debt under our 2018 Loan Agreement in June 2022.

Income tax provision

We use the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Due to our historical operating performance and our recorded cumulative net losses in prior fiscal periods, our net deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance.

Financial statement effects of uncertain tax positions are recognized when it is more-likely-than-not, based on the technical merits of the position, that it will be sustained upon examination. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included within the provision for income tax.

66

Results of operations

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021

We made the decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment between December 8, 2021 and September 15, 2022 as a result of the DOJ investigation and claims audits (as further described in “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits”). Beginning in late 2021, as a result of the impact of the DOJ investigation on the Company's business and financial condition, we shifted our strategy to limit our costs, conducted a reduction in force and took other precautionary measures to preserve capital and liquidity. As a result, the following comparison of the 2022 and 2021 fiscal years reflect a trend of decreasing expenditures due to the implementation of capital and liquidity preservation measures.

* Not Meaningful

Revenue, net

Gross systems shipped during 2022 were 24,247, compared to 45,136 in 2021, of which less than 1% and 44%, respectively, were to customers with potential insurance coverage. The decrease in shipment volume was largely driven by our decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in the fourth quarter of 2021. Beginning September 2022, we resumed accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment in certain limited circumstances and for which revenue is and has been recognized. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2022, we shipped Eargo hearing devices to Victra, our retail partner, for in-person customer sales at its approximately 1,500 store locations across the United States, for which we recognize revenue upon shipment to our retail partner.

Revenue, which is reported net of consideration payable to customers and expected returns, increased by $5.1 million, or 16.0%, from $32.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2021 to $37.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2022.

In September 2022, we made the determination not to seek payment for approximately $16.1 million from customers with unsubmitted and unpaid claims, or the Pricing Concession. This decision resulted in a reduction in net revenue of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 after the remeasurement of the corresponding sales return reserve and the utilization of the related allowance for expected credit losses.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the $34.4 million settlement amount associated with the DOJ investigation was recorded as a reduction in revenue. Additionally, we previously estimated that a majority of customers with unsubmitted claims as of December 31, 2021 would choose to return the hearing aid system if their insurance provider denied their claim or the claim was ultimately not submitted by us for payment, resulting in an increase in expected product returns from such transactions that occurred prior to September 21, 2021. As a result, we recorded $13.3 million of estimated sales returns as a reduction in revenue in the third quarter of 2021 related to shipments to customers with potential insurance benefits. Further, we did not recognize revenue and related sales

67

returns reserve on approximately 2,230 Eargo hearing aid systems shipped during the year ended December 31, 2021 and subsequent to learning of the DOJ investigation, as these transactions did not meet the criteria for revenue recognition.

Cost of revenue, gross profit, and gross margin

Cost of revenue decreased by $5.0 million, or 17.8%, from $28.0 million during 2021 to $23.0 million during 2022. The change was primarily due to the decrease in the volume of Eargo hearing aid systems shipped, partially offset by charges related to certain slow moving inventory items.

Gross margin increased to 38.3% during 2022, compared to 13.0% during 2021. The increase in gross margins is primarily due to revenue-related adjustments made in 2021, including the $34.4 million settlement amount associated with the DOJ investigation, the expected increase in product returns from customers with unsubmitted claims, as well as the approximately 2,230 Eargo hearing aid systems shipped during the year ended December 31, 2021, for which no revenue was recognized as the transactions did not meet criteria for revenue recognition.

Estimated sales returns are recorded as a reduction in revenue. The $18.2 million of estimated sales returns recorded during 2022 significantly decreased from the $37.7 million of estimated sales returns recorded during 2021. The reduction is attributable primarily to $13.3 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021 for estimated sales returns related to the expected increase in product returns from shipments to customers with potential insurance benefits and the reduction in the number of our gross systems shipped during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Research and development (R&D)

R&D expenses decreased by $6.4 million, or 25.4%, from $25.2 million during 2021 to $18.8 million during 2022. The change was primarily due to the impact of decreased headcount, a net decrease of $5.5 million in personnel and personnel-related costs due in part to a decrease in stock-based compensation, primarily related to the suspension of our ESPP in November 2021 and a reduction in cumulative compensation costs of $1.8 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022 related to the non-achievement of certain performance targets for restricted stock units. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2022, there was a net decrease of $1.1 million in third-party costs subsequent to the commercial launches of Eargo 5 in July 2021 and Eargo 6 in January 2022.

Sales and marketing

Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $32.8 million, or 38.3%, from $85.8 million during 2021 to $52.9 million during 2022. The change was primarily due to decreases in direct marketing, advertising and promotional expenses of $19.5 million due to a reduction in media spend following our decision to temporarily stop accepting insurance benefits as a method of direct payment on December 8, 2021, and decreases in personnel and personnel-related costs of $13.3 million due to decreased headcount and suspension of our ESPP in November 2021.

General and administrative

General and administrative expenses increased by $4.4 million, or 8.8%, from $49.9 million during 2021 to $54.3 million during 2022. This change was primarily due to an increase of $6.6 million in general corporate costs primarily related to legal, accounting, consulting and other professional fees driven by activities related to the DOJ investigation and compliance matters and increase in

68

insurance overhead costs as a result of operating as a public company, and $5.7 million in third-party costs related to the issuance of the Notes. The increase was partially offset by a net decrease in bad debt expense during the year ended December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021 our bad debt expense was higher by $8.9 million, based on our estimate that a significant number of customers whose claims are denied by insurance providers or not submitted by us for payment may not pay for or return the hearing aid system.

Interest income

Interest income increased by $1.2 million, from $0.1 million during 2021 to $1.2 million during 2022. The increase in interest income was primarily attributable to the increased interest rates on cash balances during 2022.

Interest expense

Interest expense decreased by $0.5 million, or 48.6%, from $1.1 million during 2021 to $0.6 million during 2022. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to the repayment of long-term debt under our 2018 Loan Agreement in June 2022 and our accounting policy election to account for the Notes at fair value and include interest expense related to the Notes in the changes in fair value.

Change in fair value of convertible notes

The change in fair value of convertible notes payable of $45.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 represents the difference between the fair value of the Notes at issuance and the fair value of the Conversion Shares on the dates of settlement. Prior to the closing of the Rights Offering, the fair value of the Notes was estimated as a combination of our equity, an option on our equity valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and a short position in a bond valued under the discounted cash flow model. The conversion date fair value of the Notes was estimated based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock adjusted for the impact of certain legal restrictions on the Conversion Shares.

Loss on extinguishment of debt

Loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 arose from the early repayment of long-term debt under our 2018 Loan Agreement in June 2022.

69

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

* Not Meaningful

Revenue, net

Gross systems shipped during 2021 were 45,136, compared to 38,243 in 2020. The increase in shipment volume was largely driven by a continued expansion in national marketing efforts and customer adoption of our telecare model. However, revenue, which is reported net of consideration payable to customers and expected returns, decreased by $37.0 million, or 53.6%, from $69.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 to $32.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.

The $34.4 million settlement amount associated with the DOJ investigation was recorded as a reduction in revenue during the year ended December 31, 2021. Additionally, we estimated that a majority of customers with unsubmitted claims will choose to return the hearing aid system if their insurance provider denies their claim or the claim is ultimately not submitted by us for payment, resulting in an increase in expected product returns from such transactions that occurred prior to September 21, 2021. As a result, we recorded $13.3 million of estimated sales returns as a reduction in revenue in the third quarter of 2021 related to shipments to customers with potential insurance benefits.

Further, we did not recognize revenue and related sales returns reserve on approximately 2,230 Eargo hearing aid systems shipped during third and fourth quarters of 2021 subsequent to learning of the DOJ investigation, as these transactions did not meet the criteria for revenue recognition. We recognized revenue on approximately 42,910 Eargo hearing aid systems shipped to customers during 2021, a 12.2% increase compared to the 38,243 Eargo hearing aid systems for which revenue was recognized during 2020. The impact on revenue from an increase in the volume of shipments was offset by the $34.4 million settlement amount, the increase in expected returns from customers with potential insurance benefits and with unsubmitted claims as of December 31, 2021, and by the hearing aid systems shipped for which we did not recognize revenue.

Cost of revenue, gross profit, and gross margin

70

Cost of revenue increased by $6.1 million, or 27.8%, from $21.9 million during 2020 to $28.0 million during 2021. The change was primarily due to the increase in the volume of Eargo hearing aid systems shipped, product mix shift towards Eargo 5 which has a higher average product cost, and higher depreciation and software amortization related to the Eargo 5 commercial launch in July 2021.

Gross margin decreased to 13.0% during 2021, compared to 68.4% during 2020. The decrease in gross margins is primarily due to the $34.4 million settlement amount associated with the DOJ investigation, the expected increase in product returns from customers with unsubmitted claims, the approximately 2,230 Eargo hearing aid systems shipped during the third and fourth quarters of 2021 for which we did not recognize related revenue, and a product mix shift towards Eargo 5, which has a higher cost of goods per product sold.

Estimated sales returns are recorded as a reduction in revenue. The $37.7 million of estimated sales returns recorded during 2021 is an increase of $15.0 million from the $22.7 million of estimated sales returns recorded during 2020. This change is primarily due to $13.3 million of estimated sales returns recorded during the third quarter of 2021 related to the expected increase in product returns from shipments to customers with potential insurance benefits.

Research and development (R&D)

R&D expenses increased by $13.2 million, or 109.5%, from $12.0 million during 2020 to $25.2 million during 2021. The change was primarily due to a net increase of $10.6 million in personnel and personnel-related costs, which includes the impact of increased headcount and an increase in stock-based compensation of $6.1 million, and a net increase of $1.8 million in third-party costs related to current and future product development initiatives.

Sales and marketing

Sales and marketing expenses increased by $36.2 million, or 73.2%, from $49.5 million during 2020 to $85.8 million during 2021. The change was primarily due to increases in direct marketing, advertising and promotional expenses of $18.9 million, partially driven by increased rates due to decreased cable TV viewership in our core demographic, and an increase in personnel and personnel-related costs of $17.3 million, which includes the impact of increased headcount (a trend that was reversed in the fourth quarter of 2021 as further described in the introductory paragraph to this “—Results of operations” and “—DOJ investigation and settlement and claims audits”), higher commissions from increased sales and an increase in stock-based compensation of $9.6 million.

General and administrative